l3enji
2021-04-08
Reply plssss
US still far from Fed's goals, with support needed 'for some time': minutes
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
3
5
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":341469941,"tweetId":"341469941","gmtCreate":1617847301283,"gmtModify":1634296171303,"author":{"id":3576842974991593,"idStr":"3576842974991593","authorId":3576842974991593,"authorIdStr":"3576842974991593","name":"l3enji","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4f6737dcbd83a51cc07a69c1a7321191","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":10,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Reply plssss</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Reply plssss</p></body></html>","text":"Reply plssss","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/341469941","repostId":1177568836,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177568836","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617846220,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177568836?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-08 09:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US still far from Fed's goals, with support needed 'for some time': minutes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177568836","media":"FoxBusiness","summary":"Divisions among policymakers seen over how much longer to keep massive central bank support in place","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>Divisions among policymakers seen over how much longer to keep massive central bank support in place.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Even as the U.S. economy gathered steam this yearFederal Reserveofficials remained cautious about the continuing risks of the pandemic and committed to pouring on monetary policy support until a rebound was more secure, minutes of the central bank's March meeting reflect.</p>\n<p>With their own forecasts projecting the strongest run of economic growth in nearly 40 years, \"participants agreed that the economy remained far from the (FedRs) longer-run goals and that the path ahead remained highly uncertain,\" the Fed's minutes stated on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>\"Participants noted that it would likely be some time,\" before conditions improved enough for the Fed to consider pulling support.</p>\n<p>What that may mean in practice however remains unclear, and divisions among Fed officials over how much longer to keep massive central bank support in place were on display Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Chicago Fed President Charles Evans, who agrees with the majority of his colleagues that interest rates will likely need to say near zero through 2023, said he envisions an uncomfortable period of higher inflation this year, but that the Fed shouldn't budge until it's sure that prices won't just fall back again below the Fed's 2% inflation goal.</p>\n<p>\"We really have to be patient and be willing to be bolder than most conservative central bankers would choose to be,\" he told reporters.</p>\n<p>Separately, Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan reiterated his longstanding worries that low rates and the Fed's bond purchases could fuel excesses and imbalances in markets.</p>\n<p>Once the pandemic has receded, he said, the Fed should pare its bond buying and move toward raising rates in 2022, and signaled he may even be open to doing both at once.</p>\n<p>\"My thought is the tapering would come first,\" Kaplan said in a virtual discussion organized by UBS. \"I think in my mind it would be substantially completed before you dealt with Fed funds rate, but I would like to retain flexibility on that.\"</p>\n<p><b>NO CHANGES AT MARCH MEETING</b></p>\n<p>At the March 16-17 meeting, the Fed made no changes to its near zero target interest rate or the $120 billion pace of monthly bond buying, and also did not change its standing pledge to keep all of that in place until the economy is recovered from the lost jobs and other financial damage done by the pandemic and the sharp associated recession.</p>\n<p>But Fed officials did boost their outlook for the economy by a significant margin as they surveyed progress on the vaccines and the trillions of dollars in newly committed federal spending and concluded the economy was primed.</p>\n<p>The median Fed policymaker projection for economic growth in 2021 was increased from 4.2% as of December to 6.5%, which would if achieved be the fastest rate of expansion since 1984.</p>\n<p>Even with its policies unchanged, the outcome of the meeting suggested an evolving debate among policymakers about just how quickly recovery may occur, with four officials, including Dallas Fed's Kaplan, projecting a rate increase may be appropriate as early as next year.</p>\n<p>That is much faster than the core of officials who don't expect rates will need to rise until at least 2024.</p>\n<p>A shift in Fed strategy last year saw the Fed put a higher premium on encouraging employment, and saying it wanted inflation to run above its formal 2% target \"for some time\" in order to offset years when the pace of price increases was too weak.</p>\n<p>That new framework was adopted unanimously. But the shift of several policymakers' views prompted some second guessing about whether the commitment is as deep as presented.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Howard Schneider, Ann Saphir, Jonnelle Marte; Editing by Dan Burns and Andrea Ricci)</p>\n<p></p>","source":"lsy1610518597439","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US still far from Fed's goals, with support needed 'for some time': minutes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS still far from Fed's goals, with support needed 'for some time': minutes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-08 09:43 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/fed-minutes><strong>FoxBusiness</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Divisions among policymakers seen over how much longer to keep massive central bank support in place.\n\nEven as the U.S. economy gathered steam this yearFederal Reserveofficials remained cautious about...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/fed-minutes\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/fed-minutes","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177568836","content_text":"Divisions among policymakers seen over how much longer to keep massive central bank support in place.\n\nEven as the U.S. economy gathered steam this yearFederal Reserveofficials remained cautious about the continuing risks of the pandemic and committed to pouring on monetary policy support until a rebound was more secure, minutes of the central bank's March meeting reflect.\nWith their own forecasts projecting the strongest run of economic growth in nearly 40 years, \"participants agreed that the economy remained far from the (FedRs) longer-run goals and that the path ahead remained highly uncertain,\" the Fed's minutes stated on Wednesday.\n\"Participants noted that it would likely be some time,\" before conditions improved enough for the Fed to consider pulling support.\nWhat that may mean in practice however remains unclear, and divisions among Fed officials over how much longer to keep massive central bank support in place were on display Wednesday.\nChicago Fed President Charles Evans, who agrees with the majority of his colleagues that interest rates will likely need to say near zero through 2023, said he envisions an uncomfortable period of higher inflation this year, but that the Fed shouldn't budge until it's sure that prices won't just fall back again below the Fed's 2% inflation goal.\n\"We really have to be patient and be willing to be bolder than most conservative central bankers would choose to be,\" he told reporters.\nSeparately, Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan reiterated his longstanding worries that low rates and the Fed's bond purchases could fuel excesses and imbalances in markets.\nOnce the pandemic has receded, he said, the Fed should pare its bond buying and move toward raising rates in 2022, and signaled he may even be open to doing both at once.\n\"My thought is the tapering would come first,\" Kaplan said in a virtual discussion organized by UBS. \"I think in my mind it would be substantially completed before you dealt with Fed funds rate, but I would like to retain flexibility on that.\"\nNO CHANGES AT MARCH MEETING\nAt the March 16-17 meeting, the Fed made no changes to its near zero target interest rate or the $120 billion pace of monthly bond buying, and also did not change its standing pledge to keep all of that in place until the economy is recovered from the lost jobs and other financial damage done by the pandemic and the sharp associated recession.\nBut Fed officials did boost their outlook for the economy by a significant margin as they surveyed progress on the vaccines and the trillions of dollars in newly committed federal spending and concluded the economy was primed.\nThe median Fed policymaker projection for economic growth in 2021 was increased from 4.2% as of December to 6.5%, which would if achieved be the fastest rate of expansion since 1984.\nEven with its policies unchanged, the outcome of the meeting suggested an evolving debate among policymakers about just how quickly recovery may occur, with four officials, including Dallas Fed's Kaplan, projecting a rate increase may be appropriate as early as next year.\nThat is much faster than the core of officials who don't expect rates will need to rise until at least 2024.\nA shift in Fed strategy last year saw the Fed put a higher premium on encouraging employment, and saying it wanted inflation to run above its formal 2% target \"for some time\" in order to offset years when the pace of price increases was too weak.\nThat new framework was adopted unanimously. But the shift of several policymakers' views prompted some second guessing about whether the commitment is as deep as presented.\n(Reporting by Howard Schneider, Ann Saphir, Jonnelle Marte; Editing by Dan Burns and Andrea Ricci)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":178,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":11,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/341469941"}
精彩评论