esxlu
05-05
这么搞谁还买
小米汽车OTA升级引发车主不满
免责声明:上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点,不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP,发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
1
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":431812312985616,"tweetId":"431812312985616","gmtCreate":1746445131590,"gmtModify":1746445133630,"author":{"id":3495355870257484,"idStr":"3495355870257484","authorId":3495355870257484,"authorIdStr":"3495355870257484","name":"esxlu","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36a216567f5437cc42cb06df15fd7a24","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":2,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"html":"<html><head></head><body><p>这么搞谁还买</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>这么搞谁还买</p></body></html>","text":"这么搞谁还买","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/431812312985616","repostId":2532336012,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2532336012","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1746297609,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2532336012?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2025-05-04 02:40","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"小米汽车OTA升级引发车主不满","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2532336012","media":"中关村在线","summary":"小米汽车近期因对SU7 Ultra车型进行OTA升级,引入“赛道考核解锁”机制,引发了车主的广泛不满。有法律界人士指出,此举可能是企业为规避车辆超速可能引发的连带责任而采取的技术性应对。此次争议也暴露出行业内部的深层次矛盾。一方面,小米方面表示,该措施旨在减少车辆在公共道路上因高性能带来的安全风险。近年来,多地发生因飙车导致的事故,促使监管政策趋严。面对舆论压力,小米随后紧急撤回了该次OTA更新,事件暂告一段落。","content":"<html><body><article><img src=\"https://fid-75186.picgzc.qpic.cn/20250504095637773d152d0ihcxo0ki5\"/><p>小米汽车近期因对SU7 Ultra车型进行OTA升级,引入“赛道考核解锁”机制,引发了车主的广泛不满。根据此次升级内容,车辆原本1548匹马力的性能需在完成特定赛道圈速考核后方可完全释放;若未达标,日常使用中最大马力将被限制在900匹。这一做法被部分用户批评为“性能打折还需自费解锁”,来自郑州的一位车主表示,花费高价购车却要额外花钱跑赛道才能获得应有的性能表现,性价比严重不符。有法律界人士指出,此举可能是企业为规避车辆超速可能引发的连带责任而采取的技术性应对。</p><p>此次争议也暴露出行业内部的深层次矛盾。一方面,小米方面表示,该措施旨在减少车辆在公共道路上因高性能带来的安全风险。近年来,多地发生因飙车导致的事故,促使监管政策趋严。此外,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>、保时捷等车企也曾对车辆性能进行类似限制,相关做法并非首次出现。但另一方面,许多消费者认为,车企未经充分沟通就单方面更改车辆性能设定,侵犯了其对车辆完整性能的使用权。</p><p>面对舆论压力,小米随后紧急撤回了该次OTA更新,事件暂告一段落。然而,如何在技术进步、法律风险与用户体验之间找到平衡,仍是摆在整个行业面前的难题。此番博弈或将影响未来新能源汽车领域对“性能消费”的理解与运营方式。</p></article></body></html>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>小米汽车OTA升级引发车主不满</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n小米汽车OTA升级引发车主不满\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2025-05-04 02:40 北京时间 <a href=http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20250504095642974e8b85&s=b><strong>中关村在线</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>小米汽车近期因对SU7 Ultra车型进行OTA升级,引入“赛道考核解锁”机制,引发了车主的广泛不满。根据此次升级内容,车辆原本1548匹马力的性能需在完成特定赛道圈速考核后方可完全释放;若未达标,日常使用中最大马力将被限制在900匹。这一做法被部分用户批评为“性能打折还需自费解锁”,来自郑州的一位车主表示,花费高价购车却要额外花钱跑赛道才能获得应有的性能表现,性价比严重不符。有法律界人士指出,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20250504095642974e8b85&s=b\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"81810":"小米集团-WR","LU0307460666.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS CHINA EQUITY \"A\" ACC","BK1615":"港股-互联网","BK1506":"5G概念","LU1328277881.USD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH FUND \"AA\" (USD) INC","01810":"小米集团-W","LU0588546209.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - China Equity Fund AS SGD","LU0235996351.USD":"UBS (LUX) KEY SELECTION SICAV - ASIAN EQUITY (USD) \"P\" (USD) ACC","BK1607":"新IT概念","LU0417516902.SGD":"Allianz China Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0143863198.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES\"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0359201612.USD":"贝莱德中国基金A2","LU0314109678.HKD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH \"AA\" (HKD) INC","LU0359202008.SGD":"Blackrock China Fund A2 SGD-H","LU0456846285.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Greater China A (acc) SGD","LU2399975544.HKD":"ALLIANZ ALL CHINA EQUITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU1023057109.AUD":"BGF CHINA \"A2\" (AUDHDG) ACC","LU0797268264.HKD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU1720050803.USD":"安联全方位中国股票基金","LU1808992512.USD":"AB ALL CHINA EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0572944931.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon China Opportunities A2 SGD","LU0634319403.HKD":"ALLIANZ HONG KONG EQUITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU1961090484.USD":"ALLIANZ ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1868837565.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES \"1\" (USD) ACC","BK1521":"挪威政府全球养老基金持仓","LU1719994722.HKD":"NINETY ONE GSF ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0320764599.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton China A Acc SGD","LU0871576103.HKD":"HSBC GIF CHINESE EQUITY \"AC\" (HKD) ACC","LU2097828631.EUR":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"A\" (EUR) ACC","LU0918141705.HKD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU0918141887.USD":"安联亚洲实际收益股票基金","LU2778985437.USD":"ALLIANZ CHINA FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0708995583.HKD":"TEMPLETON CHINA \"A\" (HKD) ACC","BK1589":"北水核心资产","LU0611395673.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2039709279.SGD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH \"AA\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU2097828714.EUR":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"BAZ\" (EUR) ACC","LU0823038988.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS ASIA EQUITY FOCUS \"A2\" (USD) ACC","BK1618":"Manus概念股","LU1813983027.USD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU0348816934.USD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AT\" (USD)","HXXD.SI":"Xiaomi HK SDR 2to1","LU2097828805.USD":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"A-AZ\" (USD) ACC","LU0359201885.HKD":"BGF CHINA \"A2\" (HKD) ACC","LU0345776255.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ASIAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0823039010.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS ASIA EQUITY FOCUS \"A2\" (USD) INC","LU0823426308.USD":"法巴中国股票基金","LU0211977185.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GREATER CHINA EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU0345775950.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ASIAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20250504095642974e8b85&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2532336012","content_text":"小米汽车近期因对SU7 Ultra车型进行OTA升级,引入“赛道考核解锁”机制,引发了车主的广泛不满。根据此次升级内容,车辆原本1548匹马力的性能需在完成特定赛道圈速考核后方可完全释放;若未达标,日常使用中最大马力将被限制在900匹。这一做法被部分用户批评为“性能打折还需自费解锁”,来自郑州的一位车主表示,花费高价购车却要额外花钱跑赛道才能获得应有的性能表现,性价比严重不符。有法律界人士指出,此举可能是企业为规避车辆超速可能引发的连带责任而采取的技术性应对。此次争议也暴露出行业内部的深层次矛盾。一方面,小米方面表示,该措施旨在减少车辆在公共道路上因高性能带来的安全风险。近年来,多地发生因飙车导致的事故,促使监管政策趋严。此外,特斯拉、保时捷等车企也曾对车辆性能进行类似限制,相关做法并非首次出现。但另一方面,许多消费者认为,车企未经充分沟通就单方面更改车辆性能设定,侵犯了其对车辆完整性能的使用权。面对舆论压力,小米随后紧急撤回了该次OTA更新,事件暂告一段落。然而,如何在技术进步、法律风险与用户体验之间找到平衡,仍是摆在整个行业面前的难题。此番博弈或将影响未来新能源汽车领域对“性能消费”的理解与运营方式。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"81810":0.9,"01810":1,"HXXD.SI":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":616,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":12,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/431812312985616"}
精彩评论