👍_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-12-21

👍

Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":693428839,"tweetId":"693428839","gmtCreate":1640066569423,"gmtModify":1640066574617,"author":{"id":3569531614182731,"idStr":"3569531614182731","authorId":3569531614182731,"authorIdStr":"3569531614182731","name":"Gabrielle_20","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3687c03e4fcd937f9b3fa40fa7705b14","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":9,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>👍</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>👍</body></html>","text":"👍","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693428839","repostId":1117226796,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1117226796","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640057164,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1117226796?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-21 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117226796","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good ","content":"Summary<blockquote>总结</blockquote> <ul> <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li> <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li> <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images<blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies 是一只战场股票。对于多头来说，听取空头的论点是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但由于强大的护城河和良好的增长前景，PLTR 对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资。</li></ul>spxChrome/E+ 来自盖蒂图片社</blockquote> Article Thesis<blockquote>文章论文</blockquote> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.<blockquote>Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信 Palantir Technologies 是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年内带来巨大的增长。</blockquote> 3 Issues Brought Up By Bears<blockquote>空头提出的3个问题</blockquote> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:<blockquote>Palantir 是一只成长型股票，既有高度确信的多头，也有高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨的阵营，但看看空头的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote> 1. Shareholder Dilution<blockquote>1.股东摊薄</blockquote> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:<blockquote>全公司范围的增长很重要，但每股增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或摧毁很多股东价值。例如，苹果 (AAPL) 的净利润在过去十年中增长了约 190%：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Data by YCharts<blockquote>数据由YCharts提供</blockquote> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):<blockquote>然而，由于股票数量减少，其每股收益增长了 350%，更具吸引力，但回购创造了大量股东价值。也有一些例子表明，股票数量的增加摧毁了很多股东的价值，例如花旗集团 (C)：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Data by YCharts<blockquote>数据由YCharts提供</blockquote> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:<blockquote>大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致自 2007 年以来每股收益下降了 75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，查看公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为这些变化从长远来看会产生很大的影响。在 Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。在最近一个季度，Palantir 的股票数量如下：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Palantir Press Release<blockquote>资料来源：Palantir 新闻稿</blockquote> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.<blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir 的平均股数为 18.95 亿股，季度增长 3.5%，年增长率约为十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不容忽视，当他们声称股东正在以有意义的速度被稀释时，值得争论。另一方面，Palantir 的业务增长率远高于每季度 3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为 40%，而且 Palantir 在未来几年也应该实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释程度将会下降。不仅亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB）等许多其他成长型公司都是如此，而且从期权奖励的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司的成熟，随着公司风险的降低，员工会更加放心，他们不再需要大量的期权包。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，Palantir 还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这将使公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也将有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote> 2. Reliance on government contracts<blockquote>2. 依赖政府合同</blockquote> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:<blockquote>在最近一篇悲观的文章中，Seeking Alpha 撰稿人 On The Pulse 认为 Palantir 被高估了，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。事实上，Palantir Technologies 如今在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于其商业业务的大规模增长，Palantir 最近已经摆脱了政府合同的多元化：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Palantir Technologies presentation<blockquote>资料来源：Palantir 技术演示文稿</blockquote> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With<blockquote>事实上，Palantir 的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各行各业的商业客户显然都看到了 Palantir 技术的巨大价值——否则，他们就不会快速购买。和</blockquote> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.<blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，多年来，Palantir将成为一家越来越少依赖政府合同的公司，并最终转变为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使 Palantir 永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有的关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳步增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域有巨大的进一步投资需求。</blockquote> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actuallydeclinedyear-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.<blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据 Palantir 最新的季度报告（上文链接），其运营费用在 2020 年第三季度至 2021 年第三季度期间增加了 900 万美元，而同期收入增加了 1.03 亿美元。这支持了基于股份的薪酬的变化。如果包括这些 SBC 费用，Palantir 的费用实际上拒绝同比增长，而该公司的收入增长了近 40%。因此，我认为，Palantir 多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明 Palantir 将能够大幅提高利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长 9000 万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长 900 万美元——从而实现了出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote> 3. Exposure to rising rates<blockquote>3. 面临利率上升的风险</blockquote> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.<blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在 2022 年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长缓慢或没有增长但在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润的公司更容易受到贴现率上升的影响。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股的表现优于成长型股。Palantir 尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我相信，这里没有真正的反驳论点——在其他条件相同的情况下，与艾伯维 (ABBV) 等价值股相比，利率上升对 Palantir 的影响确实会更大。</blockquote> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.<blockquote>然而，这对 Palantir 来说是一个渐进的负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免购买股票。事实上，尽管利率上升可能带来一些潜在的不利因素，但如果其他论点具有更大的分量，Palantir 仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我看到 PLTR 的巨大增长潜力和巨大护城河超过了利率上升带来的一些近期不利因素。</blockquote> Why Palantir Is Still Attractive<blockquote>为什么 Palantir 仍然有吸引力</blockquote> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.<blockquote>空头提出了一系列反对 Palantir 的论点，如上所述，这些论点可能有道理。我相信它们在某些情况下可能被夸大了，但看看熊的论点不会有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是一个太大的阻力，因为 PLTR 的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在未来几年放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的情况来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.<blockquote>尽管存在这些争论，我相信 Palantir 仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且 Palantir 似乎拥有非常宽阔的护城河。这种合并最终可能会使 Palantir 成为最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况在短期内发生。相反，我相信，随着我们的世界变得越来越渴望数据，Palantir 很有可能在 2020 年代及以后以相当大的速度增长——政府和企业都将试图从所有这些数据中获得最大价值，而 Palantir 凭借其量身定制的解决方案将为客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的 Foundry for crypto 等新工具，Palantir 处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于 Palantir 可以接触到顶尖人才——这是 SBC 和出色工作环境的结果——我相信 Palantir 很有可能能够在大数据/人工智能领域的各种未来市场中具有高度竞争力，而这些市场甚至可能还不存在。</blockquote> Takeaway<blockquote>外卖</blockquote> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.<blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir 在我的投资组合中有些异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的结合，Palantir 对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信 Palantir 很有可能在未来 10 多年内成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。明年收入的 19 倍，PLTR 并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在未来许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说也一点也不奇怪。听听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nSeeking Alpha2021-12-21 11:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nSummary<blockquote>总结</blockquote> <ul> <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li> <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li> <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images<blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies 是一只战场股票。对于多头来说，听取空头的论点是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但由于强大的护城河和良好的增长前景，PLTR 对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资。</li></ul>spxChrome/E+ 来自盖蒂图片社</blockquote> Article Thesis<blockquote>文章论文</blockquote> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.<blockquote>Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信 Palantir Technologies 是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年内带来巨大的增长。</blockquote> 3 Issues Brought Up By Bears<blockquote>空头提出的3个问题</blockquote> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:<blockquote>Palantir 是一只成长型股票，既有高度确信的多头，也有高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨的阵营，但看看空头的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote> 1. Shareholder Dilution<blockquote>1.股东摊薄</blockquote> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:<blockquote>全公司范围的增长很重要，但每股增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或摧毁很多股东价值。例如，苹果 (AAPL) 的净利润在过去十年中增长了约 190%：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Data by YCharts<blockquote>数据由YCharts提供</blockquote> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):<blockquote>然而，由于股票数量减少，其每股收益增长了 350%，更具吸引力，但回购创造了大量股东价值。也有一些例子表明，股票数量的增加摧毁了很多股东的价值，例如花旗集团 (C)：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Data by YCharts<blockquote>数据由YCharts提供</blockquote> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:<blockquote>大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致自 2007 年以来每股收益下降了 75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，查看公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为这些变化从长远来看会产生很大的影响。在 Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。在最近一个季度，Palantir 的股票数量如下：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Palantir Press Release<blockquote>资料来源：Palantir 新闻稿</blockquote> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.<blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir 的平均股数为 18.95 亿股，季度增长 3.5%，年增长率约为十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不容忽视，当他们声称股东正在以有意义的速度被稀释时，值得争论。另一方面，Palantir 的业务增长率远高于每季度 3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为 40%，而且 Palantir 在未来几年也应该实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释程度将会下降。不仅亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB）等许多其他成长型公司都是如此，而且从期权奖励的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司的成熟，随着公司风险的降低，员工会更加放心，他们不再需要大量的期权包。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，Palantir 还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这将使公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也将有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote> 2. Reliance on government contracts<blockquote>2. 依赖政府合同</blockquote> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:<blockquote>在最近一篇悲观的文章中，Seeking Alpha 撰稿人 On The Pulse 认为 Palantir 被高估了，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。事实上，Palantir Technologies 如今在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于其商业业务的大规模增长，Palantir 最近已经摆脱了政府合同的多元化：</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Palantir Technologies presentation<blockquote>资料来源：Palantir 技术演示文稿</blockquote> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With<blockquote>事实上，Palantir 的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各行各业的商业客户显然都看到了 Palantir 技术的巨大价值——否则，他们就不会快速购买。和</blockquote> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.<blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，多年来，Palantir将成为一家越来越少依赖政府合同的公司，并最终转变为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使 Palantir 永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有的关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳步增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域有巨大的进一步投资需求。</blockquote> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actuallydeclinedyear-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.<blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据 Palantir 最新的季度报告（上文链接），其运营费用在 2020 年第三季度至 2021 年第三季度期间增加了 900 万美元，而同期收入增加了 1.03 亿美元。这支持了基于股份的薪酬的变化。如果包括这些 SBC 费用，Palantir 的费用实际上拒绝同比增长，而该公司的收入增长了近 40%。因此，我认为，Palantir 多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明 Palantir 将能够大幅提高利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长 9000 万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长 900 万美元——从而实现了出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote> 3. Exposure to rising rates<blockquote>3. 面临利率上升的风险</blockquote> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.<blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在 2022 年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长缓慢或没有增长但在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润的公司更容易受到贴现率上升的影响。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股的表现优于成长型股。Palantir 尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我相信，这里没有真正的反驳论点——在其他条件相同的情况下，与艾伯维 (ABBV) 等价值股相比，利率上升对 Palantir 的影响确实会更大。</blockquote> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.<blockquote>然而，这对 Palantir 来说是一个渐进的负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免购买股票。事实上，尽管利率上升可能带来一些潜在的不利因素，但如果其他论点具有更大的分量，Palantir 仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我看到 PLTR 的巨大增长潜力和巨大护城河超过了利率上升带来的一些近期不利因素。</blockquote> Why Palantir Is Still Attractive<blockquote>为什么 Palantir 仍然有吸引力</blockquote> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.<blockquote>空头提出了一系列反对 Palantir 的论点，如上所述，这些论点可能有道理。我相信它们在某些情况下可能被夸大了，但看看熊的论点不会有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是一个太大的阻力，因为 PLTR 的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在未来几年放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的情况来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.<blockquote>尽管存在这些争论，我相信 Palantir 仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且 Palantir 似乎拥有非常宽阔的护城河。这种合并最终可能会使 Palantir 成为最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况在短期内发生。相反，我相信，随着我们的世界变得越来越渴望数据，Palantir 很有可能在 2020 年代及以后以相当大的速度增长——政府和企业都将试图从所有这些数据中获得最大价值，而 Palantir 凭借其量身定制的解决方案将为客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的 Foundry for crypto 等新工具，Palantir 处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于 Palantir 可以接触到顶尖人才——这是 SBC 和出色工作环境的结果——我相信 Palantir 很有可能能够在大数据/人工智能领域的各种未来市场中具有高度竞争力，而这些市场甚至可能还不存在。</blockquote> Takeaway<blockquote>外卖</blockquote> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.<blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir 在我的投资组合中有些异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的结合，Palantir 对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信 Palantir 很有可能在未来 10 多年内成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。明年收入的 19 倍，PLTR 并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在未来许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说也一点也不奇怪。听听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy\">Seeking Alpha</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117226796","content_text":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.\nPLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.\nDespite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.\n\nspxChrome/E+ via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nPalantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.\n3 Issues Brought Up By Bears\nPalantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:\n1. Shareholder Dilution\nGrowth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:\nData by YCharts\nThanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):\nData by YCharts\nMassive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:\nSource: Palantir Press Release\nCompared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was 1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.\n2. Reliance on government contracts\nIn a recent bearish article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:\nSource: Palantir Technologies presentation\nIn fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With\nWith the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.\nThe claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actuallydeclinedyear-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.\n3. Exposure to rising rates\nMassive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.\nThis being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.\nWhy Palantir Is Still Attractive\nBears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.\nPalantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased Foundry for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.\nTakeaway\nIn general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":995,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":2,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/693428839"}