power_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-12-24

power

Is JD.com's Stock Overvalued Or Undervalued?<blockquote>京东的股票是被高估还是被低估？</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":698837948,"tweetId":"698837948","gmtCreate":1640335643795,"gmtModify":1640335644527,"author":{"id":3584333947690568,"idStr":"3584333947690568","authorId":3584333947690568,"authorIdStr":"3584333947690568","name":"MrTig3r","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b99cfe4b0a492018c40761a39a193aa8","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":66,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>power</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>power</body></html>","text":"power","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698837948","repostId":1103939939,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103939939","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1640331648,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1103939939?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-24 15:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is JD.com's Stock Overvalued Or Undervalued?<blockquote>京东的股票是被高估还是被低估？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103939939","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"JD.Com Inc (NASDAQ:JD) shares have lagged the S&P 500 in 2021, generating a year-to-date total retur","content":"JD.Com Inc&nbsp;(NASDAQ:JD) shares have lagged the S&amp;P 500 in 2021, generating a year-to-date total return loss of 16.1%.<blockquote>京东公司（纳斯达克股票代码：JD）股价在 2021 年落后于标普500，年初至今总回报率损失为 16.1%。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/348fb6f16daa57bc0b2b74aa73f08e1a\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"378\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Photo: courtesy of JD<blockquote>照片：京东提供</blockquote> JD's&nbsp;stock has had a wild ride in 2021, but investors may be wondering whether there’s any value in JD.com shares after the recent pullback.<blockquote>京东的股价在 2021 年一路狂飙，但投资者可能想知道，在最近的回调之后，京东的股价是否还有价值。</blockquote> Earnings:A price-to-earnings ratio (PE) is one of the most basic fundamental metrics for gauging a stock’s value. The lower the PE, the higher the value.<blockquote>收益：市盈率（PE）是衡量股票价值的最基本的基本指标之一。PE越低，价值越高。</blockquote> For comparison, the S&amp;P 500’s PE is currently at about 28.7, nearly double its long-term average of 15.9.JD.com’s PE is 29.1, roughly in-line with the S&amp;P 500 average as a whole.<blockquote>相比之下，标普500目前的市盈率约为 28.7，几乎是其长期平均水平 15.9 的两倍。京东的市盈率为 29.1，与标普500的整体平均水平大致一致。.</blockquote> Growth:Looking ahead to the next four quarters, the S&amp;P 500's forward PE ratio looks much more reasonable at just 20.8.JD.com’s forward earnings multiple of 5.4 is still less than a third the S&amp;P 500’s, making JD.com look undervalued. JD.com’s forward PE ratio is also only about 17% of the average multiple of its consumer discretionary peers, which are averaging a 31.7 forward earnings multiple.<blockquote>增长：展望未来四个季度，标准普尔 500 指数的远期市盈率看起来更加合理，仅为 20.8。京东5.4的远期市盈率仍不到标普500的三分之一，这使得京东看起来被低估了. 京东的远期市盈率也仅为非必需消费品同行平均市盈率的 17% 左右，而非必需消费品同行的平均远期市盈率为 31.7。</blockquote> Yet when it comes to evaluating a stock, earnings aren't everything.<blockquote>然而，在评估股票时，收益并不是一切。</blockquote> The growth rate is also critical for companies that are rapidly building their bottom lines. The price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio (PEG) is a good way to incorporate growth rates into the evaluation process.<blockquote>对于快速建立利润的公司来说，增长率也至关重要。市盈率增长率（PEG）是将增长率纳入评估过程的好方法。</blockquote> The S&amp;P 500’s overall PEG is currently about 1.0; JD.com’s PEG is 1.23, about 23% higher than the S&amp;P 500.<blockquote>标普500的总体挂钩目前约为 1.0；京东的挂钩利率为 1.23，比标普500高出约 23%。</blockquote> Price-to-sales ratio is another important valuation metric, particularly for unprofitable companies and growth stocks. The S&amp;P 500’s PS ratio is currently 3.11, well above its long-term average of 1.63. JD.com’s PS ratio is 0.86, less than a third of the S&amp;P 500 average as a whole. JD.com's PS ratio is also down 22.3% over the last five years, suggesting the stock is priced at the low end of its historical valuation range.<blockquote>市销率是另一个重要的估值指标，特别是对于未盈利的公司和成长型股票。标普500目前的市盈率为 3.11，远高于其长期平均水平 1.63。京东的 PS 比率为 0.86，不到整个标普500平均水平的三分之一。京东的市盈率在过去五年中也下降了22.3%，这表明该股的定价处于历史估值范围的低端。</blockquote> Finally, Wall Street analysts see value in JD.com stock over the next 12 months.The average analyst price target among the 41 analysts covering JD.com is $105.19, suggesting 57.1% upside from current levels.<blockquote>最后，华尔街分析师看到了未来 12 个月京东股票的价值。研究京东的 41 位分析师的平均分析师目标价为 105.19 美元，较当前水平上涨 57.1%。</blockquote> The Verdict:At its current price, JD.com stock appears to be extremely undervalued based on a sampling of common fundamental valuation metrics.<blockquote>结论：根据常见基本估值指标的抽样，以目前的价格计算，京东股票似乎被严重低估。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is JD.com's Stock Overvalued Or Undervalued?<blockquote>京东的股票是被高估还是被低估？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs JD.com's Stock Overvalued Or Undervalued?<blockquote>京东的股票是被高估还是被低估？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\nBenzinga Earnings \n2021-12-24 15:40\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nJD.Com Inc&nbsp;(NASDAQ:JD) shares have lagged the S&amp;P 500 in 2021, generating a year-to-date total return loss of 16.1%.<blockquote>京东公司（纳斯达克股票代码：JD）股价在 2021 年落后于标普500，年初至今总回报率损失为 16.1%。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/348fb6f16daa57bc0b2b74aa73f08e1a\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"378\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Photo: courtesy of JD<blockquote>照片：京东提供</blockquote> JD's&nbsp;stock has had a wild ride in 2021, but investors may be wondering whether there’s any value in JD.com shares after the recent pullback.<blockquote>京东的股价在 2021 年一路狂飙，但投资者可能想知道，在最近的回调之后，京东的股价是否还有价值。</blockquote> Earnings:A price-to-earnings ratio (PE) is one of the most basic fundamental metrics for gauging a stock’s value. The lower the PE, the higher the value.<blockquote>收益：市盈率（PE）是衡量股票价值的最基本的基本指标之一。PE越低，价值越高。</blockquote> For comparison, the S&amp;P 500’s PE is currently at about 28.7, nearly double its long-term average of 15.9.JD.com’s PE is 29.1, roughly in-line with the S&amp;P 500 average as a whole.<blockquote>相比之下，标普500目前的市盈率约为 28.7，几乎是其长期平均水平 15.9 的两倍。京东的市盈率为 29.1，与标普500的整体平均水平大致一致。.</blockquote> Growth:Looking ahead to the next four quarters, the S&amp;P 500's forward PE ratio looks much more reasonable at just 20.8.JD.com’s forward earnings multiple of 5.4 is still less than a third the S&amp;P 500’s, making JD.com look undervalued. JD.com’s forward PE ratio is also only about 17% of the average multiple of its consumer discretionary peers, which are averaging a 31.7 forward earnings multiple.<blockquote>增长：展望未来四个季度，标准普尔 500 指数的远期市盈率看起来更加合理，仅为 20.8。京东5.4的远期市盈率仍不到标普500的三分之一，这使得京东看起来被低估了. 京东的远期市盈率也仅为非必需消费品同行平均市盈率的 17% 左右，而非必需消费品同行的平均远期市盈率为 31.7。</blockquote> Yet when it comes to evaluating a stock, earnings aren't everything.<blockquote>然而，在评估股票时，收益并不是一切。</blockquote> The growth rate is also critical for companies that are rapidly building their bottom lines. The price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio (PEG) is a good way to incorporate growth rates into the evaluation process.<blockquote>对于快速建立利润的公司来说，增长率也至关重要。市盈率增长率（PEG）是将增长率纳入评估过程的好方法。</blockquote> The S&amp;P 500’s overall PEG is currently about 1.0; JD.com’s PEG is 1.23, about 23% higher than the S&amp;P 500.<blockquote>标普500的总体挂钩目前约为 1.0；京东的挂钩利率为 1.23，比标普500高出约 23%。</blockquote> Price-to-sales ratio is another important valuation metric, particularly for unprofitable companies and growth stocks. The S&amp;P 500’s PS ratio is currently 3.11, well above its long-term average of 1.63. JD.com’s PS ratio is 0.86, less than a third of the S&amp;P 500 average as a whole. JD.com's PS ratio is also down 22.3% over the last five years, suggesting the stock is priced at the low end of its historical valuation range.<blockquote>市销率是另一个重要的估值指标，特别是对于未盈利的公司和成长型股票。标普500目前的市盈率为 3.11，远高于其长期平均水平 1.63。京东的 PS 比率为 0.86，不到整个标普500平均水平的三分之一。京东的市盈率在过去五年中也下降了22.3%，这表明该股的定价处于历史估值范围的低端。</blockquote> Finally, Wall Street analysts see value in JD.com stock over the next 12 months.The average analyst price target among the 41 analysts covering JD.com is $105.19, suggesting 57.1% upside from current levels.<blockquote>最后，华尔街分析师看到了未来 12 个月京东股票的价值。研究京东的 41 位分析师的平均分析师目标价为 105.19 美元，较当前水平上涨 57.1%。</blockquote> The Verdict:At its current price, JD.com stock appears to be extremely undervalued based on a sampling of common fundamental valuation metrics.<blockquote>结论：根据常见基本估值指标的抽样，以目前的价格计算，京东股票似乎被严重低估。</blockquote>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JD":"京东","09618":"京东集团-SW"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103939939","content_text":"JD.Com Inc (NASDAQ:JD) shares have lagged the S&P 500 in 2021, generating a year-to-date total return loss of 16.1%.\nPhoto: courtesy of JD\nJD's stock has had a wild ride in 2021, but investors may be wondering whether there’s any value in JD.com shares after the recent pullback.\nEarnings:A price-to-earnings ratio (PE) is one of the most basic fundamental metrics for gauging a stock’s value. The lower the PE, the higher the value.\nFor comparison, the S&P 500’s PE is currently at about 28.7, nearly double its long-term average of 15.9.JD.com’s PE is 29.1, roughly in-line with the S&P 500 average as a whole.\nGrowth:Looking ahead to the next four quarters, the S&P 500's forward PE ratio looks much more reasonable at just 20.8.JD.com’s forward earnings multiple of 5.4 is still less than a third the S&P 500’s, making JD.com look undervalued. JD.com’s forward PE ratio is also only about 17% of the average multiple of its consumer discretionary peers, which are averaging a 31.7 forward earnings multiple.\nYet when it comes to evaluating a stock, earnings aren't everything.\nThe growth rate is also critical for companies that are rapidly building their bottom lines. The price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio (PEG) is a good way to incorporate growth rates into the evaluation process.\nThe S&P 500’s overall PEG is currently about 1.0; JD.com’s PEG is 1.23, about 23% higher than the S&P 500.\nPrice-to-sales ratio is another important valuation metric, particularly for unprofitable companies and growth stocks. The S&P 500’s PS ratio is currently 3.11, well above its long-term average of 1.63. JD.com’s PS ratio is 0.86, less than a third of the S&P 500 average as a whole. JD.com's PS ratio is also down 22.3% over the last five years, suggesting the stock is priced at the low end of its historical valuation range.\nFinally, Wall Street analysts see value in JD.com stock over the next 12 months.The average analyst price target among the 41 analysts covering JD.com is $105.19, suggesting 57.1% upside from current levels.\nThe Verdict:At its current price, JD.com stock appears to be extremely undervalued based on a sampling of common fundamental valuation metrics.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"09618":0.9,"JD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3352,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":5,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/698837948"}