Ompit
2021-10-14
Like my comment pls ty
Tesla Releases Shareholder Vote Tallies. The Nun’s Proposal Did Better.<blockquote>特斯拉公布股东投票结果。修女的提议效果更好。</blockquote>
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
2
9
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":825654303,"tweetId":"825654303","gmtCreate":1634223461344,"gmtModify":1634223461406,"author":{"id":3581920273351571,"idStr":"3581920273351571","authorId":3581920273351571,"authorIdStr":"3581920273351571","name":"Ompit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5d1381c6a6fb29143792cde72a34239","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":22,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like my comment pls ty</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like my comment pls ty</p></body></html>","text":"Like my comment pls ty","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/825654303","repostId":1175916079,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175916079","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634223205,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1175916079?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-14 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Releases Shareholder Vote Tallies. The Nun’s Proposal Did Better.<blockquote>特斯拉公布股东投票结果。修女的提议效果更好。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175916079","media":"Barrons","summary":"Investors already knew the results of shareholder voting at Tesla‘s annual meeting. But until now in","content":"<p> Investors already knew the results of shareholder voting at Tesla‘s annual meeting. But until now investors didn’t know exactly how the voting went down.</p><p><blockquote>投资者已经知道了特斯拉年会上股东投票的结果。但直到现在，投资者还不知道投票结果究竟是如何下降的。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla (ticker: TSLA) filed the full annual meeting voting results on Wednesday afternoon. It turns out Kimbal Musk cruised and a proposal from a group of nuns did a little better.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）于周三下午提交了完整的年会投票结果。原来金巴尔·马斯克巡游了一圈，一群修女的提议做得更好一点。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s annual shareholder meeting was held on Oct. 7 at the electric vehicle company’s new facility in Austin, Texas. The big news coming out of that meeting was CEO Elon Musk’s announcement that the company would move its headquarters to Texas from California.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的年度股东大会于 10 月 7 日在这家电动汽车公司位于德克萨斯州奥斯汀的新工厂举行。那次会议传出的大新闻是首席执行官埃隆-马斯克（Elon Musk）宣布公司将把总部从加利福尼亚州迁至德克萨斯州。</blockquote></p><p> That move didn’t need shareholder approval. Other items discussed at the meeting, of course, did. Here’s how the voting went down, along with some recent history.</p><p><blockquote>此举不需要股东批准。当然，会议上讨论的其他项目也是如此。以下是投票过程以及最近的一些历史。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Proposal 1: Election of Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch</b></p><p><blockquote><b>提案 1：选举金巴尔·马斯克和詹姆斯·默多克</b></blockquote></p><p> Elon Musk’s brother, Kimbal Musk, and media mogul James Murdoch were up for re-election. Re-election of directors typically isn’t that exciting, but proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services, of ISS, recommended shareholders vote against their re-election. ISS had a problem with Tesla’s board compensation practices.</p><p><blockquote>埃隆-马斯克的弟弟金巴尔-马斯克和媒体大亨詹姆斯-默多克将竞选连任。董事连任通常并不令人兴奋，但 ISS 的代理顾问机构股东服务公司建议股东投票反对连任。国际空间站对特斯拉的董事会薪酬做法有意见。</blockquote></p><p> The ISS recommendation didn’t matter. Kimbal Musk received more than 473 million votes for re-election and about 117 million votes against. Murdoch received about 412 million votes for and 175 million against.</p><p><blockquote>国际空间站的建议并不重要。金巴尔·马斯克获得了超过 4.73 亿张连任选票和约 1.17 亿张反对票。默多克获得了大约4.12亿张赞成票和1.75亿张反对票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Proposals 2 and 5: Board of Director Terms</b></p><p><blockquote><b>提案2和5：董事会任期</b></blockquote></p><p> A proposal to reduce director terms to two years wasn’t ratified because too few shareholders voted on it. The proposal did receive about 590 million votes, but the total votes cast amounted to less than the two-thirds required to make the vote official.</p><p><blockquote>一项将董事任期缩短至两年的提案未获批准，因为投票支持该提案的股东太少。该提案确实获得了大约5.9亿张选票，但总票数不到正式投票所需的三分之二。</blockquote></p><p> Another proposal, proposal 5, which was submitted by shareholders to reduce director terms to one year, was approved by a vote of roughly 315 million for and 260 million against.</p><p><blockquote>另一项提案，即提案 5，由股东提交，旨在将董事任期缩短至一年，以约 3.15 亿赞成、2.6 亿反对的票数获得通过。</blockquote></p><p> This proposal, however, is non-binding. The board doesn’t have to adopt it. Non-binding proposals are one way of signaling what shareholders want without directly interfering with board oversight of the company.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这项提议不具约束力。董事会不必采纳。不具约束力的提案是在不直接干扰董事会对公司监督的情况下表达股东意愿的一种方式。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Proposal 9: Human Rights and the Sisters of the Good Shepherd</b></p><p><blockquote><b>提案9：人权与好牧人修女会</b></blockquote></p><p> Proposal 9 was a non-binding proposal submitted by the Sisters of the Good Shepherd wanting Tesla to increase reporting on human rights issues impacted by company operations. It’s a noble idea, but Tesla’s board recommended against voting for the proposal saying, in part, that tracking all the parts and materials Tesla uses all the way up and down its supply chain—from the mine to the assembly line—was too difficult.</p><p><blockquote>提案9是好牧人修女会提交的一项不具约束力的提案，希望特斯拉增加对受公司运营影响的人权问题的报告。这是一个崇高的想法，但特斯拉董事会建议不投票支持该提案，部分原因是追踪特斯拉从矿山到装配线供应链上下游使用的所有零部件和材料太困难了。</blockquote></p><p> The proposal was voted down, but the Sisters of the Good Shepherd received 149 million votes for and 427 million against.</p><p><blockquote>该提案被否决，但好牧人修女会获得了1.49亿张赞成票和4.27亿张反对票。</blockquote></p><p> A similar proposal in 2020 received 27 million votes for and 83 million against. That is the equivalent to about 135 million votes for and 415 million against. Don’t forget Tesla split its stock 5-for-1 in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>2020年的一项类似提案获得了2700万张赞成票和8300万张反对票。这相当于大约1.35亿张赞成票和4.15亿张反对票。别忘了特斯拉在 2020 年将股票拆分为 5 比 1。</blockquote></p><p> The nuns did a little better. They got about 26% of the votes cast in 2021 compared with 25% in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>修女们做得好一点。他们在2021年获得了大约26%的选票，而2020年只有25%。</blockquote></p><p> Since Tesla’s annual meeting, the stock has gained about 2%. The S&P 500,Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite Index have declined about 1% over the same span.</p><p><blockquote>自特斯拉年会以来，该股上涨了约 2%。标准普尔500指数、道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数同期下跌约1%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Releases Shareholder Vote Tallies. The Nun’s Proposal Did Better.<blockquote>特斯拉公布股东投票结果。修女的提议效果更好。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Releases Shareholder Vote Tallies. The Nun’s Proposal Did Better.<blockquote>特斯拉公布股东投票结果。修女的提议效果更好。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-14 22:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> Investors already knew the results of shareholder voting at Tesla‘s annual meeting. But until now investors didn’t know exactly how the voting went down.</p><p><blockquote>投资者已经知道了特斯拉年会上股东投票的结果。但直到现在，投资者还不知道投票结果究竟是如何下降的。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla (ticker: TSLA) filed the full annual meeting voting results on Wednesday afternoon. It turns out Kimbal Musk cruised and a proposal from a group of nuns did a little better.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）于周三下午提交了完整的年会投票结果。原来金巴尔·马斯克巡游了一圈，一群修女的提议做得更好一点。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s annual shareholder meeting was held on Oct. 7 at the electric vehicle company’s new facility in Austin, Texas. The big news coming out of that meeting was CEO Elon Musk’s announcement that the company would move its headquarters to Texas from California.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的年度股东大会于 10 月 7 日在这家电动汽车公司位于德克萨斯州奥斯汀的新工厂举行。那次会议传出的大新闻是首席执行官埃隆-马斯克（Elon Musk）宣布公司将把总部从加利福尼亚州迁至德克萨斯州。</blockquote></p><p> That move didn’t need shareholder approval. Other items discussed at the meeting, of course, did. Here’s how the voting went down, along with some recent history.</p><p><blockquote>此举不需要股东批准。当然，会议上讨论的其他项目也是如此。以下是投票过程以及最近的一些历史。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Proposal 1: Election of Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch</b></p><p><blockquote><b>提案 1：选举金巴尔·马斯克和詹姆斯·默多克</b></blockquote></p><p> Elon Musk’s brother, Kimbal Musk, and media mogul James Murdoch were up for re-election. Re-election of directors typically isn’t that exciting, but proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services, of ISS, recommended shareholders vote against their re-election. ISS had a problem with Tesla’s board compensation practices.</p><p><blockquote>埃隆-马斯克的弟弟金巴尔-马斯克和媒体大亨詹姆斯-默多克将竞选连任。董事连任通常并不令人兴奋，但 ISS 的代理顾问机构股东服务公司建议股东投票反对连任。国际空间站对特斯拉的董事会薪酬做法有意见。</blockquote></p><p> The ISS recommendation didn’t matter. Kimbal Musk received more than 473 million votes for re-election and about 117 million votes against. Murdoch received about 412 million votes for and 175 million against.</p><p><blockquote>国际空间站的建议并不重要。金巴尔·马斯克获得了超过 4.73 亿张连任选票和约 1.17 亿张反对票。默多克获得了大约4.12亿张赞成票和1.75亿张反对票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Proposals 2 and 5: Board of Director Terms</b></p><p><blockquote><b>提案2和5：董事会任期</b></blockquote></p><p> A proposal to reduce director terms to two years wasn’t ratified because too few shareholders voted on it. The proposal did receive about 590 million votes, but the total votes cast amounted to less than the two-thirds required to make the vote official.</p><p><blockquote>一项将董事任期缩短至两年的提案未获批准，因为投票支持该提案的股东太少。该提案确实获得了大约5.9亿张选票，但总票数不到正式投票所需的三分之二。</blockquote></p><p> Another proposal, proposal 5, which was submitted by shareholders to reduce director terms to one year, was approved by a vote of roughly 315 million for and 260 million against.</p><p><blockquote>另一项提案，即提案 5，由股东提交，旨在将董事任期缩短至一年，以约 3.15 亿赞成、2.6 亿反对的票数获得通过。</blockquote></p><p> This proposal, however, is non-binding. The board doesn’t have to adopt it. Non-binding proposals are one way of signaling what shareholders want without directly interfering with board oversight of the company.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这项提议不具约束力。董事会不必采纳。不具约束力的提案是在不直接干扰董事会对公司监督的情况下表达股东意愿的一种方式。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Proposal 9: Human Rights and the Sisters of the Good Shepherd</b></p><p><blockquote><b>提案9：人权与好牧人修女会</b></blockquote></p><p> Proposal 9 was a non-binding proposal submitted by the Sisters of the Good Shepherd wanting Tesla to increase reporting on human rights issues impacted by company operations. It’s a noble idea, but Tesla’s board recommended against voting for the proposal saying, in part, that tracking all the parts and materials Tesla uses all the way up and down its supply chain—from the mine to the assembly line—was too difficult.</p><p><blockquote>提案9是好牧人修女会提交的一项不具约束力的提案，希望特斯拉增加对受公司运营影响的人权问题的报告。这是一个崇高的想法，但特斯拉董事会建议不投票支持该提案，部分原因是追踪特斯拉从矿山到装配线供应链上下游使用的所有零部件和材料太困难了。</blockquote></p><p> The proposal was voted down, but the Sisters of the Good Shepherd received 149 million votes for and 427 million against.</p><p><blockquote>该提案被否决，但好牧人修女会获得了1.49亿张赞成票和4.27亿张反对票。</blockquote></p><p> A similar proposal in 2020 received 27 million votes for and 83 million against. That is the equivalent to about 135 million votes for and 415 million against. Don’t forget Tesla split its stock 5-for-1 in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>2020年的一项类似提案获得了2700万张赞成票和8300万张反对票。这相当于大约1.35亿张赞成票和4.15亿张反对票。别忘了特斯拉在 2020 年将股票拆分为 5 比 1。</blockquote></p><p> The nuns did a little better. They got about 26% of the votes cast in 2021 compared with 25% in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>修女们做得好一点。他们在2021年获得了大约26%的选票，而2020年只有25%。</blockquote></p><p> Since Tesla’s annual meeting, the stock has gained about 2%. The S&P 500,Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite Index have declined about 1% over the same span.</p><p><blockquote>自特斯拉年会以来，该股上涨了约 2%。标准普尔500指数、道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数同期下跌约1%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-tsla-shareholder-vote-tallies-51634210363?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-tsla-shareholder-vote-tallies-51634210363?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175916079","content_text":"Investors already knew the results of shareholder voting at Tesla‘s annual meeting. But until now investors didn’t know exactly how the voting went down.\nTesla (ticker: TSLA) filed the full annual meeting voting results on Wednesday afternoon. It turns out Kimbal Musk cruised and a proposal from a group of nuns did a little better.\nTesla’s annual shareholder meeting was held on Oct. 7 at the electric vehicle company’s new facility in Austin, Texas. The big news coming out of that meeting was CEO Elon Musk’s announcement that the company would move its headquarters to Texas from California.\nThat move didn’t need shareholder approval. Other items discussed at the meeting, of course, did. Here’s how the voting went down, along with some recent history.\nProposal 1: Election of Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch\nElon Musk’s brother, Kimbal Musk, and media mogul James Murdoch were up for re-election. Re-election of directors typically isn’t that exciting, but proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services, of ISS, recommended shareholders vote against their re-election. ISS had a problem with Tesla’s board compensation practices.\nThe ISS recommendation didn’t matter. Kimbal Musk received more than 473 million votes for re-election and about 117 million votes against. Murdoch received about 412 million votes for and 175 million against.\nProposals 2 and 5: Board of Director Terms\nA proposal to reduce director terms to two years wasn’t ratified because too few shareholders voted on it. The proposal did receive about 590 million votes, but the total votes cast amounted to less than the two-thirds required to make the vote official.\nAnother proposal, proposal 5, which was submitted by shareholders to reduce director terms to one year, was approved by a vote of roughly 315 million for and 260 million against.\nThis proposal, however, is non-binding. The board doesn’t have to adopt it. Non-binding proposals are one way of signaling what shareholders want without directly interfering with board oversight of the company.\nProposal 9: Human Rights and the Sisters of the Good Shepherd\nProposal 9 was a non-binding proposal submitted by the Sisters of the Good Shepherd wanting Tesla to increase reporting on human rights issues impacted by company operations. It’s a noble idea, but Tesla’s board recommended against voting for the proposal saying, in part, that tracking all the parts and materials Tesla uses all the way up and down its supply chain—from the mine to the assembly line—was too difficult.\nThe proposal was voted down, but the Sisters of the Good Shepherd received 149 million votes for and 427 million against.\nA similar proposal in 2020 received 27 million votes for and 83 million against. That is the equivalent to about 135 million votes for and 415 million against. Don’t forget Tesla split its stock 5-for-1 in 2020.\nThe nuns did a little better. They got about 26% of the votes cast in 2021 compared with 25% in 2020.\nSince Tesla’s annual meeting, the stock has gained about 2%. The S&P 500,Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite Index have declined about 1% over the same span.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":762,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":18,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/825654303"}
精彩评论