Fayna
2021-11-01
Apple did not disappoint eventually!
Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote>
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
1
3
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":843095271,"tweetId":"843095271","gmtCreate":1635780994685,"gmtModify":1635780994685,"author":{"id":3576151042223854,"idStr":"3576151042223854","authorId":3576151042223854,"authorIdStr":"3576151042223854","name":"Fayna","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d82d63e2a39fe69931574815c44edce8","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple did not disappoint eventually!</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple did not disappoint eventually!</p></body></html>","text":"Apple did not disappoint eventually!","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843095271","repostId":1175678891,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175678891","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635779942,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1175678891?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-01 23:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175678891","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the","content":"<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在第三财季财报日令人失望，但该股的抛售并没有持续太久。这是苹果公司股价早在周五就反弹的最有可能的原因。</blockquote></p><p> On October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.</p><p><blockquote>10月28日，苹果公布的第四财季业绩多年来首次落后于市场普遍预期。尽管大多数公司认为收入增长了29%，非常稳健，但苹果股票在盘后交易中遭到抛售，在财报看涨期权之前市值损失了高达1250亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Yet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.</p><p><blockquote>然而，到周五收盘时，苹果公司已经抹去了大部分短暂的损失。这位苹果专家认为，盘中复苏主要是由分析师发布的报告推动的，这些报告听起来远没有最初暗示的那么悲观。</blockquote></p><p> Below, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.</p><p><blockquote>下面，我们回顾一下华尔街专家对苹果盈利的一些主要看法。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3facec59ae76a6c28f4c5847600b4de\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"886\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：纽约州纽约市的苹果商店。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Wall Street seemed comfortable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>华尔街似乎很舒服</b></blockquote></p><p> TipRanks reported on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.</p><p><blockquote>TipRanks报告了13位在苹果上发表盈利评论的分析师。其中，没有人改变对苹果公司股票的评级，该评级仍为“适度买入”：大约四分之三的人仍然建议购买该股票。</blockquote></p><p> The traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>来自Wedbush的传统乐观分析师Dan Ives认为没有理由担心苹果及其业务。他称这家库比蒂诺公司的供应链问题是“短期内令人痛苦的噪音”，并仍然相信对苹果产品和服务的强劲需求应该会转化为2022年的销售延迟。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She lowered her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利的凯蒂·休伯蒂（Katy Huberty）是另一位直言不讳的公牛，我喜欢关注她富有洞察力的观点和分析。她将AAPL股票的目标价下调了2美元，至164美元，但仍指出未来仍有10%左右的上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> According to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师表示，“供应限制将成为苹果9月份季度收益报告后的头条新闻”，这可能会暂时抑制估值和股价。但她发表了另外两条听起来更加乐观的评论：（1）指导评论意味着第一财季收入应该符合共识，以及（2）更重要的故事是服务业和大中华区令人印象深刻的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Even the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.</p><p><blockquote>即使是不那么乐观的分析师似乎也不太担心苹果。伯恩斯坦的托尼·萨科纳吉(Tony Sacconaghi)对该股给予中性评级，并认为下行风险超过10%。尽管如此，尽管面临挑战，这位专家似乎还是对第一财季6%至9%的稳健增长和高于预期的毛利率表示认可。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple Maven’s take</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果·梅文的看法</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.</p><p><blockquote>投资者已经习惯于看到苹果在过去几年中实现令人印象深刻的盈利超出预期，在COVID-19危机期间更是如此。出于这个原因，最近的收入失误一定感觉就像在冰冷的水中浸泡一样。</blockquote></p><p> But under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.</p><p><blockquote>但在幕后，苹果最近的表现仍然令人印象深刻。尽管存在所有供应链问题，但收入仍增长了29%，尽管与2020年相比较轻松。毛利率大幅增长，运营费用保持可控。如果不是投资者不太关心的线下项目的拖累，苹果的每股收益可能会再次增长。</blockquote></p><p> I still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到该公司管理团队最近的表现，我仍然发现很难证明对苹果的看跌是合理的。看起来市场已经同意我的观点，即使周五花了几个小时才下定决心。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-01 23:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在第三财季财报日令人失望，但该股的抛售并没有持续太久。这是苹果公司股价早在周五就反弹的最有可能的原因。</blockquote></p><p> On October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.</p><p><blockquote>10月28日，苹果公布的第四财季业绩多年来首次落后于市场普遍预期。尽管大多数公司认为收入增长了29%，非常稳健，但苹果股票在盘后交易中遭到抛售，在财报看涨期权之前市值损失了高达1250亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Yet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.</p><p><blockquote>然而，到周五收盘时，苹果公司已经抹去了大部分短暂的损失。这位苹果专家认为，盘中复苏主要是由分析师发布的报告推动的，这些报告听起来远没有最初暗示的那么悲观。</blockquote></p><p> Below, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.</p><p><blockquote>下面，我们回顾一下华尔街专家对苹果盈利的一些主要看法。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3facec59ae76a6c28f4c5847600b4de\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"886\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：纽约州纽约市的苹果商店。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Wall Street seemed comfortable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>华尔街似乎很舒服</b></blockquote></p><p> TipRanks reported on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.</p><p><blockquote>TipRanks报告了13位在苹果上发表盈利评论的分析师。其中，没有人改变对苹果公司股票的评级，该评级仍为“适度买入”：大约四分之三的人仍然建议购买该股票。</blockquote></p><p> The traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>来自Wedbush的传统乐观分析师Dan Ives认为没有理由担心苹果及其业务。他称这家库比蒂诺公司的供应链问题是“短期内令人痛苦的噪音”，并仍然相信对苹果产品和服务的强劲需求应该会转化为2022年的销售延迟。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She lowered her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利的凯蒂·休伯蒂（Katy Huberty）是另一位直言不讳的公牛，我喜欢关注她富有洞察力的观点和分析。她将AAPL股票的目标价下调了2美元，至164美元，但仍指出未来仍有10%左右的上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> According to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师表示，“供应限制将成为苹果9月份季度收益报告后的头条新闻”，这可能会暂时抑制估值和股价。但她发表了另外两条听起来更加乐观的评论：（1）指导评论意味着第一财季收入应该符合共识，以及（2）更重要的故事是服务业和大中华区令人印象深刻的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Even the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.</p><p><blockquote>即使是不那么乐观的分析师似乎也不太担心苹果。伯恩斯坦的托尼·萨科纳吉(Tony Sacconaghi)对该股给予中性评级，并认为下行风险超过10%。尽管如此，尽管面临挑战，这位专家似乎还是对第一财季6%至9%的稳健增长和高于预期的毛利率表示认可。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple Maven’s take</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果·梅文的看法</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.</p><p><blockquote>投资者已经习惯于看到苹果在过去几年中实现令人印象深刻的盈利超出预期，在COVID-19危机期间更是如此。出于这个原因，最近的收入失误一定感觉就像在冰冷的水中浸泡一样。</blockquote></p><p> But under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.</p><p><blockquote>但在幕后，苹果最近的表现仍然令人印象深刻。尽管存在所有供应链问题，但收入仍增长了29%，尽管与2020年相比较轻松。毛利率大幅增长，运营费用保持可控。如果不是投资者不太关心的线下项目的拖累，苹果的每股收益可能会再次增长。</blockquote></p><p> I still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到该公司管理团队最近的表现，我仍然发现很难证明对苹果的看跌是合理的。看起来市场已经同意我的观点，即使周五花了几个小时才下定决心。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175678891","content_text":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.\nYet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.\nBelow, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.\nFigure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.\nWall Street seemed comfortable\nTipRanks reported on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.\nThe traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.\nMorgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She lowered her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.\nAccording to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.\nEven the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.\nApple Maven’s take\nInvestors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.\nBut under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.\nI still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3716,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["AAPL"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":32,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/843095271"}
精彩评论