StefanieChua
2021-10-20
Like
What actually happened during GameStop mania?<blockquote>游戏驿站狂热期间到底发生了什么？</blockquote>
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
2
9
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":859598369,"tweetId":"859598369","gmtCreate":1634707703007,"gmtModify":1634707703348,"author":{"id":3580381506485046,"idStr":"3580381506485046","authorId":3580381506485046,"authorIdStr":"3580381506485046","name":"StefanieChua","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc371f9bf0f837ccffbd4fb322be8ffc","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":51,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like</p></body></html>","text":"Like","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859598369","repostId":1123194504,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123194504","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634699967,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1123194504?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-20 11:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What actually happened during GameStop mania?<blockquote>游戏驿站狂热期间到底发生了什么？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123194504","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - In late January, there was one question on the minds of investors: How did a","content":"<p><b>London (CNN Business) - </b>In late January, there was one question on the minds of investors: How did a struggling mall-based video game retailer became Wall Street's hottest stock, seemingly overnight?</p><p><blockquote><b>伦敦（CNN商业）——</b>一月底，投资者心中有一个问题：一家陷入困境的购物中心视频游戏零售商如何在一夜之间成为华尔街最热门的股票？</blockquote></p><p> Now, after months of research, the industry's top regulator has answers — and its findings could pave the way for major reforms to how financial markets function as amateur traders remain a powerful force.</p><p><blockquote>现在，经过数月的研究，该行业的最高监管机构已经找到了答案——其研究结果可能为金融市场如何运作的重大改革铺平道路，因为业余交易者仍然是一股强大的力量。</blockquote></p><p> What's happening: The US Securities and Exchange Commission just released a44-page reportexaminingGameStop(GME)mania, the early 2021 phenomenon in which the company's shares, plugged by enthusiasts on social media, rocketed about 2,700% in a matter of weeks.</p><p><blockquote>正在发生的事情：美国证券交易委员会刚刚发布了一份长达44页的报告，审查GameStop(GME)狂热，这是2021年初的一种现象，该公司的股价在社交媒体上受到爱好者的炒作，在几周内飙升了约2,700%。</blockquote></p><p> Other companies, including movie theater chain AMC Entertainment(AMC), electronics company Koss(KOSS) and clothing chain Express(EXPR), also logged astronomical gains as online hype reached a fever pitch.</p><p><blockquote>随着网络炒作达到白热化，连锁影院AMC院线（AMC）、电子公司科斯（KOSS）和服装连锁店Express（EXPR）等其他公司也录得天文数字的涨幅。</blockquote></p><p> The report is full of interesting findings about the so-called \"meme stock\" craze. Here are some of the highlights.</p><p><blockquote>该报告充满了关于所谓“模因股票”热潮的有趣发现。以下是一些亮点。</blockquote></p><p> It really was wild.The SEC found that the number of unique accounts trading GameStop on a given day rose to nearly 900,000 by Jan. 27, up from fewer than 10,000 at the beginning of the month.</p><p><blockquote>真的很疯狂。SEC发现，截至1月27日，某一天交易游戏驿站的独立账户数量从本月初的不到10,000个增至近90万个。</blockquote></p><p> And the volume of stock changing hands was massive. Between Jan. 13 and Jan. 29, an average of 100 million GameStop shares were traded per day, up 1,400% from the 2020 average.</p><p><blockquote>股票易手量巨大。1月13日至1月29日期间，游戏驿站股票平均每天交易量为1亿股，较2020年平均水平增长1,400%。</blockquote></p><p> The action wasn't just limited to GameStop. More than 100 stocks \"experienced large price moves or increased trading volume that significantly exceeded broader market movements,\" the SEC said.</p><p><blockquote>这一行动不仅限于游戏驿站。SEC表示，100多只股票“经历了大幅价格波动或交易量增加，大大超过了大盘波动”。</blockquote></p><p> Some theories were off. One reason GameStop generated so much attention was because it fit a compelling David versus Goliath narrative, in which a band of renegade traders coordinating on platforms like Reddit successfully took on big hedge funds that had placed bets against GameStop. When the company's share price rose dramatically, those hedge funds allegedly had to buy stock in the company to cover their positions, triggering even bigger gains.</p><p><blockquote>有些理论被搁置。游戏驿站引起如此多关注的原因之一是，它符合引人注目的大卫与歌利亚的叙事，其中一群叛逆的交易员在Reddit等平台上协调，成功地对抗了做空游戏驿站的大型对冲基金。据称，当该公司股价大幅上涨时，这些对冲基金不得不购买该公司的股票来补仓，从而引发更大的涨幅。</blockquote></p><p> That did happen. But the SEC found that \"such buying was a small fraction of overall buy volume,\" and that it was \"positive sentiment, not the buying-to-cover, that sustained the weeks-long price appreciation of GameStop stock.\"</p><p><blockquote>确实发生了。但美国证券交易委员会发现，“此类购买仅占总体购买量的一小部分”，并且“积极情绪，而不是买入对冲，维持了游戏驿站股票长达数周的价格上涨。”</blockquote></p><p> Robinhood is under the microscope. The SEC thinks regulators should take a closer look at how popular trading apps function. That could put pressure on the company, which went public in July.</p><p><blockquote>罗宾汉在显微镜下。美国证券交易委员会认为监管机构应该仔细研究流行交易应用程序的运作方式。这可能会给该公司带来压力，该公司于7月上市。</blockquote></p><p> \"Consideration should be given to whether game-like features and celebratory animations that are likely intended to create positive feedback from trading lead investors to trade more than they would otherwise,\" the report said.</p><p><blockquote>报告称：“应该考虑可能旨在从交易中创造积极反馈的类似游戏的功能和庆祝动画是否会导致投资者进行比其他方式更多的交易。”</blockquote></p><p> The SEC also said the practice at the center of Robinhood's business model, known as \"payment for order flow,\" could compel the company to find \"novel ways to increase customer trading.\"</p><p><blockquote>SEC还表示，Robinhood商业模式的核心做法，即“订单流支付”，可能会迫使该公司寻找“增加客户交易的新方法”。</blockquote></p><p> When an investor places an order to buy a stock on its app, Robinhood routes the order to a market maker like Citadel Securities, which then handles execution — and pays Robinhood for that privilege. SEC Chair Gary Gensler has previously indicated he's skeptical of payment for order flow.</p><p><blockquote>当投资者在其应用程序上下单购买股票时，Robinhood会将订单发送给Citadel Securities等做市商，然后由该做市商处理执行，并向Robinhood支付该特权费用。SEC主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)此前曾表示，他对订单流的支付持怀疑态度。</blockquote></p><p> Big picture: The report didn't include specific policy recommendations. But it could help Gensler's SEC eventually make changes to how markets function.</p><p><blockquote>大图：该报告没有包括具体的政策建议。但它可以帮助Gensler的SEC最终改变市场的运作方式。</blockquote></p><p> \"January's events gave us an opportunity to consider how we can further our efforts to make the equity markets as fair, orderly and efficient as possible,\" Gensler, who was nominated by President Joe Biden, said in a statement Monday.</p><p><blockquote>由总统乔·拜登提名的詹斯勒周一在一份声明中表示：“一月份的事件让我们有机会考虑如何进一步努力，使股市尽可能公平、有序和高效。”</blockquote></p><p> But SEC Commissioners Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman, who are Republican appointees, said in a separate statement that the report went too far.</p><p><blockquote>但共和党任命的SEC委员赫斯特·皮尔斯和埃拉德·罗斯曼在另一份声明中表示，该报告走得太远了。</blockquote></p><p> \"In the wake of an anomalous market event, it can be tempting to identify a convenient scapegoat and leverage the event to pursue regulatory actions without regard to the factual record,\" they said, adding that the report, \"finds no causal connection between the meme stock volatility\" and a practice such as payment for order flow \"that has drawn recent popular attention.\"</p><p><blockquote>他们表示：“在异常市场事件发生后，人们很容易找到一个方便的替罪羊，并利用该事件采取监管行动，而不考虑事实记录。”他们补充说，该报告“没有发现两者之间存在因果关系”。模因股票波动”和“为订单流付费”等做法“最近引起了广泛关注”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What actually happened during GameStop mania?<blockquote>游戏驿站狂热期间到底发生了什么？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat actually happened during GameStop mania?<blockquote>游戏驿站狂热期间到底发生了什么？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN Business</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-20 11:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>London (CNN Business) - </b>In late January, there was one question on the minds of investors: How did a struggling mall-based video game retailer became Wall Street's hottest stock, seemingly overnight?</p><p><blockquote><b>伦敦（CNN商业）——</b>一月底，投资者心中有一个问题：一家陷入困境的购物中心视频游戏零售商如何在一夜之间成为华尔街最热门的股票？</blockquote></p><p> Now, after months of research, the industry's top regulator has answers — and its findings could pave the way for major reforms to how financial markets function as amateur traders remain a powerful force.</p><p><blockquote>现在，经过数月的研究，该行业的最高监管机构已经找到了答案——其研究结果可能为金融市场如何运作的重大改革铺平道路，因为业余交易者仍然是一股强大的力量。</blockquote></p><p> What's happening: The US Securities and Exchange Commission just released a44-page reportexaminingGameStop(GME)mania, the early 2021 phenomenon in which the company's shares, plugged by enthusiasts on social media, rocketed about 2,700% in a matter of weeks.</p><p><blockquote>正在发生的事情：美国证券交易委员会刚刚发布了一份长达44页的报告，审查GameStop(GME)狂热，这是2021年初的一种现象，该公司的股价在社交媒体上受到爱好者的炒作，在几周内飙升了约2,700%。</blockquote></p><p> Other companies, including movie theater chain AMC Entertainment(AMC), electronics company Koss(KOSS) and clothing chain Express(EXPR), also logged astronomical gains as online hype reached a fever pitch.</p><p><blockquote>随着网络炒作达到白热化，连锁影院AMC院线（AMC）、电子公司科斯（KOSS）和服装连锁店Express（EXPR）等其他公司也录得天文数字的涨幅。</blockquote></p><p> The report is full of interesting findings about the so-called \"meme stock\" craze. Here are some of the highlights.</p><p><blockquote>该报告充满了关于所谓“模因股票”热潮的有趣发现。以下是一些亮点。</blockquote></p><p> It really was wild.The SEC found that the number of unique accounts trading GameStop on a given day rose to nearly 900,000 by Jan. 27, up from fewer than 10,000 at the beginning of the month.</p><p><blockquote>真的很疯狂。SEC发现，截至1月27日，某一天交易游戏驿站的独立账户数量从本月初的不到10,000个增至近90万个。</blockquote></p><p> And the volume of stock changing hands was massive. Between Jan. 13 and Jan. 29, an average of 100 million GameStop shares were traded per day, up 1,400% from the 2020 average.</p><p><blockquote>股票易手量巨大。1月13日至1月29日期间，游戏驿站股票平均每天交易量为1亿股，较2020年平均水平增长1,400%。</blockquote></p><p> The action wasn't just limited to GameStop. More than 100 stocks \"experienced large price moves or increased trading volume that significantly exceeded broader market movements,\" the SEC said.</p><p><blockquote>这一行动不仅限于游戏驿站。SEC表示，100多只股票“经历了大幅价格波动或交易量增加，大大超过了大盘波动”。</blockquote></p><p> Some theories were off. One reason GameStop generated so much attention was because it fit a compelling David versus Goliath narrative, in which a band of renegade traders coordinating on platforms like Reddit successfully took on big hedge funds that had placed bets against GameStop. When the company's share price rose dramatically, those hedge funds allegedly had to buy stock in the company to cover their positions, triggering even bigger gains.</p><p><blockquote>有些理论被搁置。游戏驿站引起如此多关注的原因之一是，它符合引人注目的大卫与歌利亚的叙事，其中一群叛逆的交易员在Reddit等平台上协调，成功地对抗了做空游戏驿站的大型对冲基金。据称，当该公司股价大幅上涨时，这些对冲基金不得不购买该公司的股票来补仓，从而引发更大的涨幅。</blockquote></p><p> That did happen. But the SEC found that \"such buying was a small fraction of overall buy volume,\" and that it was \"positive sentiment, not the buying-to-cover, that sustained the weeks-long price appreciation of GameStop stock.\"</p><p><blockquote>确实发生了。但美国证券交易委员会发现，“此类购买仅占总体购买量的一小部分”，并且“积极情绪，而不是买入对冲，维持了游戏驿站股票长达数周的价格上涨。”</blockquote></p><p> Robinhood is under the microscope. The SEC thinks regulators should take a closer look at how popular trading apps function. That could put pressure on the company, which went public in July.</p><p><blockquote>罗宾汉在显微镜下。美国证券交易委员会认为监管机构应该仔细研究流行交易应用程序的运作方式。这可能会给该公司带来压力，该公司于7月上市。</blockquote></p><p> \"Consideration should be given to whether game-like features and celebratory animations that are likely intended to create positive feedback from trading lead investors to trade more than they would otherwise,\" the report said.</p><p><blockquote>报告称：“应该考虑可能旨在从交易中创造积极反馈的类似游戏的功能和庆祝动画是否会导致投资者进行比其他方式更多的交易。”</blockquote></p><p> The SEC also said the practice at the center of Robinhood's business model, known as \"payment for order flow,\" could compel the company to find \"novel ways to increase customer trading.\"</p><p><blockquote>SEC还表示，Robinhood商业模式的核心做法，即“订单流支付”，可能会迫使该公司寻找“增加客户交易的新方法”。</blockquote></p><p> When an investor places an order to buy a stock on its app, Robinhood routes the order to a market maker like Citadel Securities, which then handles execution — and pays Robinhood for that privilege. SEC Chair Gary Gensler has previously indicated he's skeptical of payment for order flow.</p><p><blockquote>当投资者在其应用程序上下单购买股票时，Robinhood会将订单发送给Citadel Securities等做市商，然后由该做市商处理执行，并向Robinhood支付该特权费用。SEC主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)此前曾表示，他对订单流的支付持怀疑态度。</blockquote></p><p> Big picture: The report didn't include specific policy recommendations. But it could help Gensler's SEC eventually make changes to how markets function.</p><p><blockquote>大图：该报告没有包括具体的政策建议。但它可以帮助Gensler的SEC最终改变市场的运作方式。</blockquote></p><p> \"January's events gave us an opportunity to consider how we can further our efforts to make the equity markets as fair, orderly and efficient as possible,\" Gensler, who was nominated by President Joe Biden, said in a statement Monday.</p><p><blockquote>由总统乔·拜登提名的詹斯勒周一在一份声明中表示：“一月份的事件让我们有机会考虑如何进一步努力，使股市尽可能公平、有序和高效。”</blockquote></p><p> But SEC Commissioners Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman, who are Republican appointees, said in a separate statement that the report went too far.</p><p><blockquote>但共和党任命的SEC委员赫斯特·皮尔斯和埃拉德·罗斯曼在另一份声明中表示，该报告走得太远了。</blockquote></p><p> \"In the wake of an anomalous market event, it can be tempting to identify a convenient scapegoat and leverage the event to pursue regulatory actions without regard to the factual record,\" they said, adding that the report, \"finds no causal connection between the meme stock volatility\" and a practice such as payment for order flow \"that has drawn recent popular attention.\"</p><p><blockquote>他们表示：“在异常市场事件发生后，人们很容易找到一个方便的替罪羊，并利用该事件采取监管行动，而不考虑事实记录。”他们补充说，该报告“没有发现两者之间存在因果关系”。模因股票波动”和“为订单流付费”等做法“最近引起了广泛关注”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123194504","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - In late January, there was one question on the minds of investors: How did a struggling mall-based video game retailer became Wall Street's hottest stock, seemingly overnight?\nNow, after months of research, the industry's top regulator has answers — and its findings could pave the way for major reforms to how financial markets function as amateur traders remain a powerful force.\nWhat's happening: The US Securities and Exchange Commission just released a44-page reportexaminingGameStop(GME)mania, the early 2021 phenomenon in which the company's shares, plugged by enthusiasts on social media, rocketed about 2,700% in a matter of weeks.\nOther companies, including movie theater chain AMC Entertainment(AMC), electronics company Koss(KOSS) and clothing chain Express(EXPR), also logged astronomical gains as online hype reached a fever pitch.\nThe report is full of interesting findings about the so-called \"meme stock\" craze. Here are some of the highlights.\nIt really was wild.The SEC found that the number of unique accounts trading GameStop on a given day rose to nearly 900,000 by Jan. 27, up from fewer than 10,000 at the beginning of the month.\nAnd the volume of stock changing hands was massive. Between Jan. 13 and Jan. 29, an average of 100 million GameStop shares were traded per day, up 1,400% from the 2020 average.\nThe action wasn't just limited to GameStop. More than 100 stocks \"experienced large price moves or increased trading volume that significantly exceeded broader market movements,\" the SEC said.\nSome theories were off. One reason GameStop generated so much attention was because it fit a compelling David versus Goliath narrative, in which a band of renegade traders coordinating on platforms like Reddit successfully took on big hedge funds that had placed bets against GameStop. When the company's share price rose dramatically, those hedge funds allegedly had to buy stock in the company to cover their positions, triggering even bigger gains.\nThat did happen. But the SEC found that \"such buying was a small fraction of overall buy volume,\" and that it was \"positive sentiment, not the buying-to-cover, that sustained the weeks-long price appreciation of GameStop stock.\"\nRobinhood is under the microscope. The SEC thinks regulators should take a closer look at how popular trading apps function. That could put pressure on the company, which went public in July.\n\"Consideration should be given to whether game-like features and celebratory animations that are likely intended to create positive feedback from trading lead investors to trade more than they would otherwise,\" the report said.\nThe SEC also said the practice at the center of Robinhood's business model, known as \"payment for order flow,\" could compel the company to find \"novel ways to increase customer trading.\"\nWhen an investor places an order to buy a stock on its app, Robinhood routes the order to a market maker like Citadel Securities, which then handles execution — and pays Robinhood for that privilege. SEC Chair Gary Gensler has previously indicated he's skeptical of payment for order flow.\nBig picture: The report didn't include specific policy recommendations. But it could help Gensler's SEC eventually make changes to how markets function.\n\"January's events gave us an opportunity to consider how we can further our efforts to make the equity markets as fair, orderly and efficient as possible,\" Gensler, who was nominated by President Joe Biden, said in a statement Monday.\nBut SEC Commissioners Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman, who are Republican appointees, said in a separate statement that the report went too far.\n\"In the wake of an anomalous market event, it can be tempting to identify a convenient scapegoat and leverage the event to pursue regulatory actions without regard to the factual record,\" they said, adding that the report, \"finds no causal connection between the meme stock volatility\" and a practice such as payment for order flow \"that has drawn recent popular attention.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":489,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":4,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/859598369"}
精彩评论