Real_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-08-06

Real

Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商更喜欢拜登而不是奥巴马</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":893020983,"tweetId":"893020983","gmtCreate":1628222352742,"gmtModify":1633752449613,"author":{"id":3581753686338259,"idStr":"3581753686338259","authorId":3581753686338259,"authorIdStr":"3581753686338259","name":"genieK","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/52d4ff8d1c88a2ac7f50d92cb5e9fbd7","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":7,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Real</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Real</body></html>","text":"Real","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893020983","repostId":1193751771,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193751771","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628222237,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1193751771?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 11:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商更喜欢拜登而不是奥巴马</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193751771","media":"yahoo finance","summary":"When President Obama ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in thei","content":"When President Obama&nbsp;ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and&nbsp;locked in the new rules, with no industry input.<blockquote>当奥巴马总统在2012年提高燃油经济性标准时，一些汽车制造商悄悄地挖掘他们的轮胎。到2025年，新规则将燃油效率要求提高了近一倍，迫使昂贵的新技术迅速采用。如果该技术成熟得不够快，2018 年的中期审查本应提供一个出口。但当唐纳德·特朗普在2016年赢得总统大选时，奥巴马提前了最后期限，并锁定了新规则，没有行业的意见。</blockquote> The shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency,&nbsp;Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump&nbsp;sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.<blockquote>被回避的汽车行业向特朗普请求救济，并得到了救济。就任总统两个月后，特朗普重启了中途审查，2020年特朗普大幅降低了2025年的目标。特朗普还试图阻止加利福尼亚州和其他二十几个州将自己的里程标准设定得高于联邦水平。这导致了行业的分裂，一些汽车制造商站在特朗普一边，另一些则站在加州一边。</blockquote> President Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.<blockquote>拜登总统现在正在取消特朗普的取消政策，并再次推动大幅提高燃油经济性。但他这样做是在汽车制造商更多的合作下进行的，而奥巴马则没有这样的优势： 电动汽车比九年前走得更远，各大汽车制造商都在争相将电动汽车推向市场。这使得汽车制造商现在更容易削减其车队的排放，同时具有讽刺意味的是，这使得政府能够放宽仍使用汽油的车辆的效率目标。</blockquote> <h3>Automakers are on board</h3> A new Biden executive order sets a target for up to&nbsp;50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.<blockquote><h3>汽车制造商也参与其中</h3>拜登的一项新行政命令设定了到 2030 年销售的所有新车中高达 50% 为电动汽车的目标，这意味着它们要么是全插电式、同时配备燃气发动机和电动机的混合动力汽车，要么是氢动力汽车。请注意，这是一个 “目标 ”，而不是要求。拜登的目标与汽车制造商已经宣布的目标基本一致，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>目标是到 2035 年完全淘汰汽油和柴油动力汽车。未能达到目标的处罚？没什么。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1af6cf6099a51f8b7b2be1a35f29a84\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">A sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)<blockquote>2021年7月21日星期三上午，宾夕法尼亚州斯普林镇希尔顿酒店惠庭套房酒店的ChargePoint车辆（EV）充电站上写着“仅限电动汽车充电”的标志。（图片来源：Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle，Getty Images）</blockquote> Biden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump&nbsp;lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that&nbsp;would require a 3.7% annual improvement.<blockquote>拜登还将开始将汽油动力汽车的燃油经济性标准提高到特朗普水平以上。奥巴马的规定要求燃油经济性每年提高约5%。特朗普将这一比例下调至1.5%。据报道，拜登将提出新规则，要求每年提高 3.7%。</blockquote> It will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">Bayerische Motoren Werke AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">Honda</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">Volkswagen AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">Volvo AB</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> and Jeep-Chrysler parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">Stellantis NV</a>—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.<blockquote>制定管理燃油经济性提高的联邦法规需要时间，但与之前围绕燃油经济性提高的斗争相比，汽车行业似乎不太可能试图在幕后淡化这一点。七家汽车制造商——<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">巴伐利亚发动机厂股份公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">本田</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">大众汽车公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">沃尔沃AB</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>和吉普-克莱斯勒母公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">斯特兰蒂斯公司</a>-提供白宫在宣布拜登新的电动汽车目标时分发的支持性声明。“通用汽车、福特和 Stellantis 异口同声地说：”我们期待与拜登政府合作.制定政策，以实现这些雄心勃勃的目标。汽车制造商并不经常联手称赞联邦新法规。</blockquote> There’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.<blockquote>对汽车制造商来说，还有一个巨大的甜头：数十亿美元的联邦支出支持电动汽车的发展。国会通过的两党基础设施法案包括 75 亿美元用于帮助建设电动汽车充电站。拜登希望在清洁汽车税收抵免、电池厂补贴、校车电气化和其他举措上追加超过 1500 亿美元的支出。国会可能不会提供所有这些支出，但即使其中一部分也会是支持电动汽车发展的意外之财，如果没有政府的巨额援助，电动汽车的发展风险会很大。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb3cdc7ae94763d9e64dee84b0bcdfeb\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)<blockquote>这个<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>加利福尼亚州凯特尔曼市的超级充电站是加利福尼亚州圣华金谷的一个电动汽车充电站。照片拍摄于2021年7月12日。（卡罗琳·科尔/洛杉矶时报，盖蒂图片社）</blockquote> One sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.<blockquote>拜登政府和汽车行业之间关系缓和的一个迹象是环保组织的批评，他们希望拜登能走得更远。在为拜登即将推翻特朗普规则喝彩的同时，一些团体认为他的行动太慢了。“倡导组织 Evergreen Action 在一份声明中说：”设定到 2030 年电动汽车销量达到 40%-50% 的宏伟目标是远远不够的。“拜登政府应.推动到2030年实现100%的电动汽车销量”。汽油动力汽车是一种濒临灭绝的物种，只是灭绝发生的时间问题。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商更喜欢拜登而不是奥巴马</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商更喜欢拜登而不是奥巴马</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nyahoo finance2021-08-06 11:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nWhen President Obama&nbsp;ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and&nbsp;locked in the new rules, with no industry input.<blockquote>当奥巴马总统在2012年提高燃油经济性标准时，一些汽车制造商悄悄地挖掘他们的轮胎。到2025年，新规则将燃油效率要求提高了近一倍，迫使昂贵的新技术迅速采用。如果该技术成熟得不够快，2018 年的中期审查本应提供一个出口。但当唐纳德·特朗普在2016年赢得总统大选时，奥巴马提前了最后期限，并锁定了新规则，没有行业的意见。</blockquote> The shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency,&nbsp;Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump&nbsp;sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.<blockquote>被回避的汽车行业向特朗普请求救济，并得到了救济。就任总统两个月后，特朗普重启了中途审查，2020年特朗普大幅降低了2025年的目标。特朗普还试图阻止加利福尼亚州和其他二十几个州将自己的里程标准设定得高于联邦水平。这导致了行业的分裂，一些汽车制造商站在特朗普一边，另一些则站在加州一边。</blockquote> President Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.<blockquote>拜登总统现在正在取消特朗普的取消政策，并再次推动大幅提高燃油经济性。但他这样做是在汽车制造商更多的合作下进行的，而奥巴马则没有这样的优势： 电动汽车比九年前走得更远，各大汽车制造商都在争相将电动汽车推向市场。这使得汽车制造商现在更容易削减其车队的排放，同时具有讽刺意味的是，这使得政府能够放宽仍使用汽油的车辆的效率目标。</blockquote> <h3>Automakers are on board</h3> A new Biden executive order sets a target for up to&nbsp;50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.<blockquote><h3>汽车制造商也参与其中</h3>拜登的一项新行政命令设定了到 2030 年销售的所有新车中高达 50% 为电动汽车的目标，这意味着它们要么是全插电式、同时配备燃气发动机和电动机的混合动力汽车，要么是氢动力汽车。请注意，这是一个 “目标 ”，而不是要求。拜登的目标与汽车制造商已经宣布的目标基本一致，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>目标是到 2035 年完全淘汰汽油和柴油动力汽车。未能达到目标的处罚？没什么。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1af6cf6099a51f8b7b2be1a35f29a84\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">A sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)<blockquote>2021年7月21日星期三上午，宾夕法尼亚州斯普林镇希尔顿酒店惠庭套房酒店的ChargePoint车辆（EV）充电站上写着“仅限电动汽车充电”的标志。（图片来源：Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle，Getty Images）</blockquote> Biden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump&nbsp;lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that&nbsp;would require a 3.7% annual improvement.<blockquote>拜登还将开始将汽油动力汽车的燃油经济性标准提高到特朗普水平以上。奥巴马的规定要求燃油经济性每年提高约5%。特朗普将这一比例下调至1.5%。据报道，拜登将提出新规则，要求每年提高 3.7%。</blockquote> It will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">Bayerische Motoren Werke AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">Honda</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">Volkswagen AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">Volvo AB</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> and Jeep-Chrysler parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">Stellantis NV</a>—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.<blockquote>制定管理燃油经济性提高的联邦法规需要时间，但与之前围绕燃油经济性提高的斗争相比，汽车行业似乎不太可能试图在幕后淡化这一点。七家汽车制造商——<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">巴伐利亚发动机厂股份公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">本田</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">大众汽车公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">沃尔沃AB</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>和吉普-克莱斯勒母公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">斯特兰蒂斯公司</a>-提供白宫在宣布拜登新的电动汽车目标时分发的支持性声明。“通用汽车、福特和 Stellantis 异口同声地说：”我们期待与拜登政府合作.制定政策，以实现这些雄心勃勃的目标。汽车制造商并不经常联手称赞联邦新法规。</blockquote> There’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.<blockquote>对汽车制造商来说，还有一个巨大的甜头：数十亿美元的联邦支出支持电动汽车的发展。国会通过的两党基础设施法案包括 75 亿美元用于帮助建设电动汽车充电站。拜登希望在清洁汽车税收抵免、电池厂补贴、校车电气化和其他举措上追加超过 1500 亿美元的支出。国会可能不会提供所有这些支出，但即使其中一部分也会是支持电动汽车发展的意外之财，如果没有政府的巨额援助，电动汽车的发展风险会很大。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb3cdc7ae94763d9e64dee84b0bcdfeb\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)<blockquote>这个<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>加利福尼亚州凯特尔曼市的超级充电站是加利福尼亚州圣华金谷的一个电动汽车充电站。照片拍摄于2021年7月12日。（卡罗琳·科尔/洛杉矶时报，盖蒂图片社）</blockquote> One sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.<blockquote>拜登政府和汽车行业之间关系缓和的一个迹象是环保组织的批评，他们希望拜登能走得更远。在为拜登即将推翻特朗普规则喝彩的同时，一些团体认为他的行动太慢了。“倡导组织 Evergreen Action 在一份声明中说：”设定到 2030 年电动汽车销量达到 40%-50% 的宏伟目标是远远不够的。“拜登政府应.推动到2030年实现100%的电动汽车销量”。汽油动力汽车是一种濒临灭绝的物种，只是灭绝发生的时间问题。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-automakers-like-biden-more-than-obama-154815643.html\">yahoo finance</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","GM":"通用汽车"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-automakers-like-biden-more-than-obama-154815643.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193751771","content_text":"When President Obama ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and locked in the new rules, with no industry input.\nThe shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency, Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.\nPresident Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.\nAutomakers are on board\nA new Biden executive order sets a target for up to 50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as General Motors' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.\nA sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)\nBiden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that would require a 3.7% annual improvement.\nIt will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, Honda, Volkswagen AG, Volvo AB, General Motors, Ford and Jeep-Chrysler parent Stellantis NV—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.\nThere’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.\nThe Tesla Motors Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)\nOne sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GM":0.9,"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1923,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":4,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/893020983"}