shauncj
2021-08-05
Coursera!! To the moon
Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday<blockquote>Coursera 昨天飙升 21% 后下跌 3%</blockquote>
免责声明:上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点,不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP,发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
3
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":899693819,"tweetId":"899693819","gmtCreate":1628176454731,"gmtModify":1633752886052,"author":{"id":3580638455170987,"idStr":"3580638455170987","authorId":3580638455170987,"authorIdStr":"3580638455170987","name":"shauncj","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":11,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Coursera!! To the moon</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Coursera!! To the moon</p></body></html>","text":"Coursera!! To the moon","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899693819","repostId":1132594719,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1132594719","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628171470,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1132594719?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-05 21:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday<blockquote>Coursera 昨天飙升 21% 后下跌 3%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1132594719","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. \nthe company have reported Q2 2021 financial r","content":"<p>(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. </p><p><blockquote>(8月5日)Coursera在昨天飙升21%后下跌3%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4c30f620d3324d65c0c18c0207d5830\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">the company have reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme yesterday .</p><p><blockquote>该公司昨天公布了 2021 年第二季度的财务业绩,看起来“喜忧参半”。</blockquote></p><p> On the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.</p><p><blockquote>一方面,Coursera 超出了分析师对第二季度收入的预期,实现了 1.021 亿美元,而华尔街此前的预期仅为 9150 万美元。但另一方面,Coursera 似乎完全没有达到分析师对利润的预测。根据 TheFly.com 今天早上的一篇文章,Coursera 每股亏损 0.38 美元,而不是预测的每股亏损 0.11 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Wait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.</p><p><blockquote>等等,什么?Coursera 的亏损是“应该”亏损的三倍,而其股价却在上涨?乍一看,确实是这样。所以让我为你解开谜团。</blockquote></p><p> When analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.</p><p><blockquote>分析师在进行盈利预测时,通常指的不是根据公认会计准则 (GAAP) 计算的盈利,而是 topro formaearnings。这一事实可能会在盈利时间给投资者带来一些困惑,即公司是“超出”还是“错过”盈利。</blockquote></p><p> So in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per share<i>pro forma.</i>But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company's<i>GAAP</i>loss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company's<i>pro forma</i>loss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.</p><p><blockquote>因此,就Coursera而言,分析师预测该公司每股将亏损0.11美元<i>形式上。</i>但 TheFly 和其他金融机构提到的盈利数字——每股 0.38 美元的亏损——是该公司的<i>公认会计准则</i>损失。不过,如果你从 Coursera 的业绩中剔除所有一次性费用(或分析师认为的一次性费用),那么该公司的<i>形式</i>本季度亏损仅为每股0.05美元。</blockquote></p><p> Or in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"</p><p><blockquote>或者换句话说,将苹果与苹果进行比较,这不是盈利“失误”,而是盈利“击败”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday<blockquote>Coursera 昨天飙升 21% 后下跌 3%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCoursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday<blockquote>Coursera 昨天飙升 21% 后下跌 3%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-05 21:51</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. </p><p><blockquote>(8月5日)Coursera在昨天飙升21%后下跌3%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4c30f620d3324d65c0c18c0207d5830\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">the company have reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme yesterday .</p><p><blockquote>该公司昨天公布了 2021 年第二季度的财务业绩,看起来“喜忧参半”。</blockquote></p><p> On the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.</p><p><blockquote>一方面,Coursera 超出了分析师对第二季度收入的预期,实现了 1.021 亿美元,而华尔街此前的预期仅为 9150 万美元。但另一方面,Coursera 似乎完全没有达到分析师对利润的预测。根据 TheFly.com 今天早上的一篇文章,Coursera 每股亏损 0.38 美元,而不是预测的每股亏损 0.11 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Wait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.</p><p><blockquote>等等,什么?Coursera 的亏损是“应该”亏损的三倍,而其股价却在上涨?乍一看,确实是这样。所以让我为你解开谜团。</blockquote></p><p> When analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.</p><p><blockquote>分析师在进行盈利预测时,通常指的不是根据公认会计准则 (GAAP) 计算的盈利,而是 topro formaearnings。这一事实可能会在盈利时间给投资者带来一些困惑,即公司是“超出”还是“错过”盈利。</blockquote></p><p> So in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per share<i>pro forma.</i>But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company's<i>GAAP</i>loss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company's<i>pro forma</i>loss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.</p><p><blockquote>因此,就Coursera而言,分析师预测该公司每股将亏损0.11美元<i>形式上。</i>但 TheFly 和其他金融机构提到的盈利数字——每股 0.38 美元的亏损——是该公司的<i>公认会计准则</i>损失。不过,如果你从 Coursera 的业绩中剔除所有一次性费用(或分析师认为的一次性费用),那么该公司的<i>形式</i>本季度亏损仅为每股0.05美元。</blockquote></p><p> Or in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"</p><p><blockquote>或者换句话说,将苹果与苹果进行比较,这不是盈利“失误”,而是盈利“击败”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COUR":"Coursera, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1132594719","content_text":"(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. \nthe company have reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme yesterday .\nOn the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.\nWait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.\nWhen analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.\nSo in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per sharepro forma.But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company'sGAAPloss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company'spro formaloss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.\nOr in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"COUR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":769,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":19,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/899693819"}
精彩评论