NatxEJ的个人主页 - 老虎社区

NatxEJ

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

4关注

0粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-03-13

Damn

Tesla Stock Is Down. You Could Blame Joe Biden.<blockquote>特斯拉股价下跌。你可以责怪乔·拜登。</blockquote>

2021-03-12

Cool

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-11

...

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-10

Meh

The 2021 stock market looks an awful lot like 2000. That's bad news for Big Tech<blockquote>2021年的股市看起来与2000年非常相似。这对大型科技公司来说是个坏消息</blockquote>

2021-03-08

Wew

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-08

Wew

AMC Entertainment stock surges after price target doubled at Wedbush<blockquote>韦德布什目标价翻倍后，AMC院线股价飙升</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3569583977305666","uuid":"3569583977305666","gmtCreate":1606492577259,"gmtModify":1606492577259,"name":"NatxEJ","pinyin":"natxej","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.72%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.74%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":326087961,"gmtCreate":1615564902253,"gmtModify":1703491088214,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Damn","listText":"Damn","text":"Damn","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/326087961","repostId":"1100128328","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1100128328","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615563404,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1100128328?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-12 23:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Stock Is Down. You Could Blame Joe Biden.<blockquote>特斯拉股价下跌。你可以责怪乔·拜登。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100128328","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stock inTesla is lower after CNBC reported that the electric-vehicle company had a firein its Fremon","content":"<p>Stock inTesla&nbsp;is lower after CNBC reported that the&nbsp;electric-vehicle&nbsp;company&nbsp;had a firein its Fremont, Calif. plant, but the blaze probably isn’t the reason for the dip.</p><p><blockquote>CNBC报道电动汽车公司特斯拉在加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特发生火灾后，该公司股价走低。植物，但大火可能不是下降的原因。</blockquote></p><p>Fires are just a normal, albeit unfortunate, operating problem for any manufacturer. Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the fire or the damage it may have caused.</p><p><blockquote>对于任何制造商来说，火灾只是一个正常但不幸的操作问题。特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）没有立即回应有关火灾或火灾可能造成的损失的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p>President Joe Biden is probably responsible for the share-price decline, which left the stock about 2.7% lower in premarket trading, at about $680. It has beena wild weekfor Tesla stockholders. Shares started off the week at about $675,traded above $700and fell to about $560 before bounding back, up 4.7% Thursday, to just under $700.</p><p><blockquote>总统乔·拜登可能对股价下跌负有责任，该股在盘前交易中下跌约2.7%，至约680美元。对于特斯拉股东来说，这是疯狂的一周。本周初股价约为675美元，交易价格高于700美元，跌至约560美元，然后反弹，周四上涨4.7%，至略低于700美元。</blockquote></p><p>Nothing Tesla has done appears to be the reason for the recent volatility. It’s all about interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉所做的一切似乎都不是最近波动的原因。一切都与利率有关。</blockquote></p><p>That is where the president comes into the picture. Thursday evening, he addressed the nation, focusing on putting Covid-19 in the rearview mirror a year after the World Health Organization declared that a pandemic had begun.</p><p><blockquote>这就是总统发挥作用的地方。周四晚上，他向全国发表讲话，重点是在世界卫生组织宣布疫情已经开始一年后，将新冠肺炎(Covid-19)抛在脑后。</blockquote></p><p>“All adult Americans will be eligible to get a vaccine no later than May 1,” said the president, adding the federal government is setting up hundreds of vaccination sites and procuring millions more vaccine doses.</p><p><blockquote>总统说：“所有成年美国人都有资格在5月1日之前接种疫苗。”他补充说，联邦政府正在建立数百个疫苗接种点，并采购数百万剂疫苗。</blockquote></p><p>It’s good news, but the market is selling off Friday morning. For stocks, the speech represents almost too much of a good thing. The economy is reopening and, as a result,bond yields are rising, putting pressure on high-growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>这是个好消息，但周五早上市场正在抛售。对于股票来说，这次讲话几乎代表了太多的好事。经济正在重新开放，因此债券收益率正在上升，给高增长股票带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>Futures on the&nbsp;Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;Index, home to many highflying tech stocks, are down 1.6%.Dow Jones Industrial Averagefutures, on the other hand, are flat.</p><p><blockquote>拥有许多飙升的科技股的纳斯达克综合指数期货下跌1.6%。另一方面，道琼斯工业平均指数期货持平。</blockquote></p><p>Higher yields hurt richly valued, fast-growing companies more than others for a couple of reasons. One, they makes funding growth more expensive. Two, high- growth companies are expected generate most of their cash far in the future. That cash is a little less valuable in present terms when rates are high, compared with when rates are low. In a higher-rate environment, investors have more options to earn interest today, which puts pressure on high-growth stocks’ valuations.</p><p><blockquote>较高的收益率对估值高、快速增长的公司的伤害比其他公司更大，原因有几个。第一，它们使融资增长更加昂贵。第二，高增长公司预计将在未来产生大部分现金。与利率低时相比，利率高时现金的价值较低。在利率较高的环境下，投资者如今有更多赚取利息的选择，这给高增长股票的估值带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>A Friday dip, however,doesn’t mean the end&nbsp;of the bull market in Tesla, EV stocks or the Nasdaq. Getting the economy back on its feet is a good thing. Investors just need a chance to adjust to the changing landscape.</p><p><blockquote>然而，周五的下跌并不意味着特斯拉、电动汽车股票或纳斯达克牛市的结束。让经济重新站稳脚跟是件好事。投资者只是需要一个机会来适应不断变化的环境。</blockquote></p><p>“There’s a good chance you, your families and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout …and celebrate Independence Day,” Biden said. That is great news.</p><p><blockquote>拜登说：“你、你的家人和朋友很有可能能够在你的后院或附近聚会，野餐……庆祝独立日。”这是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Stock Is Down. You Could Blame Joe Biden.<blockquote>特斯拉股价下跌。你可以责怪乔·拜登。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Stock Is Down. You Could Blame Joe Biden.<blockquote>特斯拉股价下跌。你可以责怪乔·拜登。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-12 23:36</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stock inTesla&nbsp;is lower after CNBC reported that the&nbsp;electric-vehicle&nbsp;company&nbsp;had a firein its Fremont, Calif. plant, but the blaze probably isn’t the reason for the dip.</p><p><blockquote>CNBC报道电动汽车公司特斯拉在加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特发生火灾后，该公司股价走低。植物，但大火可能不是下降的原因。</blockquote></p><p>Fires are just a normal, albeit unfortunate, operating problem for any manufacturer. Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the fire or the damage it may have caused.</p><p><blockquote>对于任何制造商来说，火灾只是一个正常但不幸的操作问题。特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）没有立即回应有关火灾或火灾可能造成的损失的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p>President Joe Biden is probably responsible for the share-price decline, which left the stock about 2.7% lower in premarket trading, at about $680. It has beena wild weekfor Tesla stockholders. Shares started off the week at about $675,traded above $700and fell to about $560 before bounding back, up 4.7% Thursday, to just under $700.</p><p><blockquote>总统乔·拜登可能对股价下跌负有责任，该股在盘前交易中下跌约2.7%，至约680美元。对于特斯拉股东来说，这是疯狂的一周。本周初股价约为675美元，交易价格高于700美元，跌至约560美元，然后反弹，周四上涨4.7%，至略低于700美元。</blockquote></p><p>Nothing Tesla has done appears to be the reason for the recent volatility. It’s all about interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉所做的一切似乎都不是最近波动的原因。一切都与利率有关。</blockquote></p><p>That is where the president comes into the picture. Thursday evening, he addressed the nation, focusing on putting Covid-19 in the rearview mirror a year after the World Health Organization declared that a pandemic had begun.</p><p><blockquote>这就是总统发挥作用的地方。周四晚上，他向全国发表讲话，重点是在世界卫生组织宣布疫情已经开始一年后，将新冠肺炎(Covid-19)抛在脑后。</blockquote></p><p>“All adult Americans will be eligible to get a vaccine no later than May 1,” said the president, adding the federal government is setting up hundreds of vaccination sites and procuring millions more vaccine doses.</p><p><blockquote>总统说：“所有成年美国人都有资格在5月1日之前接种疫苗。”他补充说，联邦政府正在建立数百个疫苗接种点，并采购数百万剂疫苗。</blockquote></p><p>It’s good news, but the market is selling off Friday morning. For stocks, the speech represents almost too much of a good thing. The economy is reopening and, as a result,bond yields are rising, putting pressure on high-growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>这是个好消息，但周五早上市场正在抛售。对于股票来说，这次讲话几乎代表了太多的好事。经济正在重新开放，因此债券收益率正在上升，给高增长股票带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>Futures on the&nbsp;Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;Index, home to many highflying tech stocks, are down 1.6%.Dow Jones Industrial Averagefutures, on the other hand, are flat.</p><p><blockquote>拥有许多飙升的科技股的纳斯达克综合指数期货下跌1.6%。另一方面，道琼斯工业平均指数期货持平。</blockquote></p><p>Higher yields hurt richly valued, fast-growing companies more than others for a couple of reasons. One, they makes funding growth more expensive. Two, high- growth companies are expected generate most of their cash far in the future. That cash is a little less valuable in present terms when rates are high, compared with when rates are low. In a higher-rate environment, investors have more options to earn interest today, which puts pressure on high-growth stocks’ valuations.</p><p><blockquote>较高的收益率对估值高、快速增长的公司的伤害比其他公司更大，原因有几个。第一，它们使融资增长更加昂贵。第二，高增长公司预计将在未来产生大部分现金。与利率低时相比，利率高时现金的价值较低。在利率较高的环境下，投资者如今有更多赚取利息的选择，这给高增长股票的估值带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>A Friday dip, however,doesn’t mean the end&nbsp;of the bull market in Tesla, EV stocks or the Nasdaq. Getting the economy back on its feet is a good thing. Investors just need a chance to adjust to the changing landscape.</p><p><blockquote>然而，周五的下跌并不意味着特斯拉、电动汽车股票或纳斯达克牛市的结束。让经济重新站稳脚跟是件好事。投资者只是需要一个机会来适应不断变化的环境。</blockquote></p><p>“There’s a good chance you, your families and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout …and celebrate Independence Day,” Biden said. That is great news.</p><p><blockquote>拜登说：“你、你的家人和朋友很有可能能够在你的后院或附近聚会，野餐……庆祝独立日。”这是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-is-down-you-could-blame-joe-biden-51615557806?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-is-down-you-could-blame-joe-biden-51615557806?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100128328","content_text":"Stock inTesla is lower after CNBC reported that the electric-vehicle company had a firein its Fremont, Calif. plant, but the blaze probably isn’t the reason for the dip.Fires are just a normal, albeit unfortunate, operating problem for any manufacturer. Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the fire or the damage it may have caused.President Joe Biden is probably responsible for the share-price decline, which left the stock about 2.7% lower in premarket trading, at about $680. It has beena wild weekfor Tesla stockholders. Shares started off the week at about $675,traded above $700and fell to about $560 before bounding back, up 4.7% Thursday, to just under $700.Nothing Tesla has done appears to be the reason for the recent volatility. It’s all about interest rates.That is where the president comes into the picture. Thursday evening, he addressed the nation, focusing on putting Covid-19 in the rearview mirror a year after the World Health Organization declared that a pandemic had begun.“All adult Americans will be eligible to get a vaccine no later than May 1,” said the president, adding the federal government is setting up hundreds of vaccination sites and procuring millions more vaccine doses.It’s good news, but the market is selling off Friday morning. For stocks, the speech represents almost too much of a good thing. The economy is reopening and, as a result,bond yields are rising, putting pressure on high-growth stocks.Futures on the Nasdaq Composite Index, home to many highflying tech stocks, are down 1.6%.Dow Jones Industrial Averagefutures, on the other hand, are flat.Higher yields hurt richly valued, fast-growing companies more than others for a couple of reasons. One, they makes funding growth more expensive. Two, high- growth companies are expected generate most of their cash far in the future. That cash is a little less valuable in present terms when rates are high, compared with when rates are low. In a higher-rate environment, investors have more options to earn interest today, which puts pressure on high-growth stocks’ valuations.A Friday dip, however,doesn’t mean the end of the bull market in Tesla, EV stocks or the Nasdaq. Getting the economy back on its feet is a good thing. Investors just need a chance to adjust to the changing landscape.“There’s a good chance you, your families and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout …and celebrate Independence Day,” Biden said. That is great news.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":606,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328127608,"gmtCreate":1615508148804,"gmtModify":1703490107255,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328127608","repostId":"2118931018","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":727,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321582718,"gmtCreate":1615453206034,"gmtModify":1703489222408,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"...","listText":"...","text":"...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/321582718","repostId":"1156309857","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":775,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":323589344,"gmtCreate":1615355264088,"gmtModify":1703487803263,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Meh","listText":"Meh","text":"Meh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323589344","repostId":"1160680775","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160680775","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615348263,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1160680775?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-10 11:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The 2021 stock market looks an awful lot like 2000. That's bad news for Big Tech<blockquote>2021年的股市看起来与2000年非常相似。这对大型科技公司来说是个坏消息</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160680775","media":"cnn","summary":"New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start ","content":"<p>New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start of the year. That should have longtime market observers worried about the similarities between now and the height of the dot-com bubble in 2000.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN Business）科技股在年初大幅飙升后，最近又出现了回调。这应该会让长期的市场观察人士担心现在与2000年互联网泡沫顶峰时期的相似之处。</blockquote></p><p> For all those Millennial Robinhood traders who were just kids 20 years ago and are relative newbies to the market, the recent volatility should serve as a lesson. For all the times that people say that \"this time is different\" that's usually a telltale sign that it actually isn't.</p><p><blockquote>对于所有那些20年前还是孩子、市场相对新手的千禧一代Robinhood交易者来说，最近的波动应该成为一个教训。尽管人们总是说“这次不同了”，但这通常是一个信号，表明事实并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> The rise of meme stocks like GameStop (GME), the flurry of initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition company mergers as well as the stunning runs in Tesla (TSLA) and bitcoin (XBT) are nothing more than another case of the forces of market speculation running amok.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站（GME）等模因股票的崛起、一系列首次公开募股和特殊目的收购公司合并，以及特斯拉（TSLA）和比特币（XBT）的惊人表现，只不过是市场投机力量的又一个例子。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are buying companies with significant challenges and ignoring the weak fundamentals. GameStop isn't the only \"meme\" stock out there. Movie theater chain AMC (AMC), clothing retailer Express (EXPR) and headphone maker Koss (KOSS) have been soaring.</p><p><blockquote>投资者正在购买面临重大挑战的公司，而忽视了疲软的基本面。游戏驿站并不是唯一的“模因”股票。连锁影院AMC(AMC)、服装零售商Express(EXPR)和耳机制造商Koss(KOSS)的股价一直在飙升。</blockquote></p><p> And all the talk about \"stonks\" and cryptocurrencies on Reddit and in TikTok videos isn't really that much different than people chattering about how high they thought Qualcomm (QCOM) and Cisco (CSCO) were going to go in the late 1990s on Raging Bull and Yahoo Finance message boards.</p><p><blockquote>Reddit和TikTok视频中所有关于“stonks”和加密货币的讨论实际上与人们在Raging Bull和雅虎财经留言板上喋喋不休地谈论他们认为高通(QCOM)和思科(CSCO)在20世纪90年代末会达到多高没有太大区别。</blockquote></p><p> There are numerous other echoes to the tech craziness of the late 1990s.</p><p><blockquote>20世纪90年代末的科技疯狂还有许多其他的回声。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Investors partying too much like 1999?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资者聚会太像1999年了？</b></blockquote></p><p> Blank check SPAC mergers may not have been popular more than twenty years ago. But there was another hot financial trend at that time that was also a sign of market froth -- companies spinning off their online divisions or setting up so-called tracking stocks for them.</p><p><blockquote>空白支票SPAC合并在二十多年前可能并不流行。但当时还有另一个炙手可热的金融趋势也是市场泡沫的标志——公司剥离其在线部门或为其设立所谓的跟踪股票。</blockquote></p><p> Barnes and Noble, for example, trying to fight off competition from a still relatively new Amazon (AMZN), spun off its Barnesandnoble.com unit into a separately traded company in 1999. It was eventually folded back into the parent company.</p><p><blockquote>例如，Barnes and Noble为了抵御来自相对较新的亚马逊(AMZN)的竞争，于1999年将其Barnesandnoble.com部门分拆为一家独立上市的公司。它最终被收归母公司。</blockquote></p><p> Tracking stocks were even more ridiculous than dot-com spinoffs.</p><p><blockquote>跟踪股票甚至比互联网公司的分拆更荒谬。</blockquote></p><p> With a tracking stock, a company would sell shares of a business unit that merely tracked the performance of the division. But investors who owned the stock didn't have the right to vote on company matters like investors in other public companies did.</p><p><blockquote>通过跟踪股票，公司将出售仅跟踪该部门业绩的业务部门的股票。但拥有该股票的投资者没有权像其他上市公司的投资者那样对公司事务进行投票。</blockquote></p><p> Disney (DIS) used to have a tracking stock named Go.com for its online operations. NBC had an internet tracking stock as well. NBCi launched in 1999 -- back when GE (GE) owned NBC. Comcast (CMCSA) is now the parent of NBC.</p><p><blockquote>迪士尼(DIS)曾经有一只名为Go.com的跟踪股票，用于其在线业务。NBC也有一只互联网跟踪股票。NBCi于1999年推出，当时通用电气(GE)拥有NBC。康卡斯特(CMCSA)现在是NBC的母公司。</blockquote></p><p> CNN owner AT&amp;T (T) had a tracking stock for its new (at the time) wireless unit in the early 2000s. So did Sprint (now owned by T-Mobile (TMUS)) for its PCS wireless division.</p><p><blockquote>CNN所有者AT&amp;T(T)在2000年代初为其新的（当时的）无线部门持有跟踪股票。Sprint（现归T-Mobile(TMUS)所有）的PCS无线部门也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> None of these tracking stocks exist anymore.</p><p><blockquote>这些跟踪股票均已不复存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO and SPAC bubble and concerns about pricey valuations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO和SPAC泡沫以及对昂贵估值的担忧</b></blockquote></p><p> There were also plenty of unprofitable companies rushing to go public, despite having little in the way of revenue let alone profits.</p><p><blockquote>还有许多未盈利的公司争先恐后地上市，尽管它们几乎没有收入，更不用说利润了。</blockquote></p><p> The spectacular collapse of Pets.com stock after its IPO in February 2000 -- just before the Nasdaq peaked -- is still the poster child of wretched market excess.</p><p><blockquote>Pets.com股票在2000年2月首次公开募股后（就在纳斯达克见顶之前）的惊人暴跌仍然是市场过剩的典型代表。</blockquote></p><p> The good news for investors today is that many of the big unicorns going public via IPOs, SPACs or directly listing their shares on exchanges are not Pets.com 2.0. Airbnb, Palantir, DoorDash and many other recent stock debuts are industry leaders.</p><p><blockquote>今天对投资者来说，好消息是，许多通过IPO、SPAC或直接在交易所上市的大型独角兽公司都不是Pets.com 2.0。爱彼迎、Palantir、DoorDash和许多其他最近首次亮相的股票都是行业领导者。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the valuations for many of these stocks are certifiably insane considering that many of the companies are still not profitable -- even though their revenues are substantial and growing rapidly.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，考虑到许多公司仍然没有盈利——尽管它们的收入可观且增长迅速，但其中许多股票的估值确实是疯狂的。</blockquote></p><p> The prices for top tech stocks, even the FAANGs, Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla that currently dominate the S&amp;P 500, might be unjustifiably high as well.</p><p><blockquote>顶级科技股的价格，甚至是目前主导标普500的FAANG、微软（MSFT）和特斯拉，也可能过高。</blockquote></p><p> According to data from FactSet, the S&amp;P 500 is currently trading at more than 21 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months. That's above the five-year average of just under 18 and the 10-year average of nearly 16.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet的数据显示，这家标普500目前的市盈率超过未来12个月盈利预期的21倍。这高于略低于18岁的五年平均水平和近16岁的10年平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> It's also approaching the peak March 2000 levels of 24 times earnings estimates. In other words, the market is priced for perfection.</p><p><blockquote>它也接近2000年3月24倍盈利预期的峰值水平。换句话说，市场是为完美定价的。</blockquote></p><p> That's problematic. If (or when) the most bubbilicious stocks finally start to pull back, the sell-off can last a long time and the damage could be severe.</p><p><blockquote>这是有问题的。如果（或当）最具泡沫的股票最终开始回调，抛售可能会持续很长时间，损害可能会很严重。</blockquote></p><p> After all, when the Nasdaq first topped the 5,000 level in March 2000, it did so after surging past the 3,000 and 4,000 levels just a few months earlier. It was a mania. But once the dot-com bubble burst, the Nasdaq did not climb back above 5,000 again until March...2015.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，当纳斯达克在2000年3月首次突破5,000点时，它是在几个月前飙升至3,000点和4,000点之后才这样做的。这是一种狂热。但一旦互联网泡沫破裂，纳斯达克直到2015年3月才再次回升至5000点以上。</blockquote></p><p> So last year's brief bear market pullback following the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in March could be just a small taste of what's to come for tech and momentum stocks.</p><p><blockquote>因此，去年3月份Covid-19爆发后的短暂熊市回调可能只是科技股和动量股未来的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The 2021 stock market looks an awful lot like 2000. That's bad news for Big Tech<blockquote>2021年的股市看起来与2000年非常相似。这对大型科技公司来说是个坏消息</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe 2021 stock market looks an awful lot like 2000. That's bad news for Big Tech<blockquote>2021年的股市看起来与2000年非常相似。这对大型科技公司来说是个坏消息</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">cnn</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-10 11:51</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start of the year. That should have longtime market observers worried about the similarities between now and the height of the dot-com bubble in 2000.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN Business）科技股在年初大幅飙升后，最近又出现了回调。这应该会让长期的市场观察人士担心现在与2000年互联网泡沫顶峰时期的相似之处。</blockquote></p><p> For all those Millennial Robinhood traders who were just kids 20 years ago and are relative newbies to the market, the recent volatility should serve as a lesson. For all the times that people say that \"this time is different\" that's usually a telltale sign that it actually isn't.</p><p><blockquote>对于所有那些20年前还是孩子、市场相对新手的千禧一代Robinhood交易者来说，最近的波动应该成为一个教训。尽管人们总是说“这次不同了”，但这通常是一个信号，表明事实并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> The rise of meme stocks like GameStop (GME), the flurry of initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition company mergers as well as the stunning runs in Tesla (TSLA) and bitcoin (XBT) are nothing more than another case of the forces of market speculation running amok.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站（GME）等模因股票的崛起、一系列首次公开募股和特殊目的收购公司合并，以及特斯拉（TSLA）和比特币（XBT）的惊人表现，只不过是市场投机力量的又一个例子。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are buying companies with significant challenges and ignoring the weak fundamentals. GameStop isn't the only \"meme\" stock out there. Movie theater chain AMC (AMC), clothing retailer Express (EXPR) and headphone maker Koss (KOSS) have been soaring.</p><p><blockquote>投资者正在购买面临重大挑战的公司，而忽视了疲软的基本面。游戏驿站并不是唯一的“模因”股票。连锁影院AMC(AMC)、服装零售商Express(EXPR)和耳机制造商Koss(KOSS)的股价一直在飙升。</blockquote></p><p> And all the talk about \"stonks\" and cryptocurrencies on Reddit and in TikTok videos isn't really that much different than people chattering about how high they thought Qualcomm (QCOM) and Cisco (CSCO) were going to go in the late 1990s on Raging Bull and Yahoo Finance message boards.</p><p><blockquote>Reddit和TikTok视频中所有关于“stonks”和加密货币的讨论实际上与人们在Raging Bull和雅虎财经留言板上喋喋不休地谈论他们认为高通(QCOM)和思科(CSCO)在20世纪90年代末会达到多高没有太大区别。</blockquote></p><p> There are numerous other echoes to the tech craziness of the late 1990s.</p><p><blockquote>20世纪90年代末的科技疯狂还有许多其他的回声。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Investors partying too much like 1999?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资者聚会太像1999年了？</b></blockquote></p><p> Blank check SPAC mergers may not have been popular more than twenty years ago. But there was another hot financial trend at that time that was also a sign of market froth -- companies spinning off their online divisions or setting up so-called tracking stocks for them.</p><p><blockquote>空白支票SPAC合并在二十多年前可能并不流行。但当时还有另一个炙手可热的金融趋势也是市场泡沫的标志——公司剥离其在线部门或为其设立所谓的跟踪股票。</blockquote></p><p> Barnes and Noble, for example, trying to fight off competition from a still relatively new Amazon (AMZN), spun off its Barnesandnoble.com unit into a separately traded company in 1999. It was eventually folded back into the parent company.</p><p><blockquote>例如，Barnes and Noble为了抵御来自相对较新的亚马逊(AMZN)的竞争，于1999年将其Barnesandnoble.com部门分拆为一家独立上市的公司。它最终被收归母公司。</blockquote></p><p> Tracking stocks were even more ridiculous than dot-com spinoffs.</p><p><blockquote>跟踪股票甚至比互联网公司的分拆更荒谬。</blockquote></p><p> With a tracking stock, a company would sell shares of a business unit that merely tracked the performance of the division. But investors who owned the stock didn't have the right to vote on company matters like investors in other public companies did.</p><p><blockquote>通过跟踪股票，公司将出售仅跟踪该部门业绩的业务部门的股票。但拥有该股票的投资者没有权像其他上市公司的投资者那样对公司事务进行投票。</blockquote></p><p> Disney (DIS) used to have a tracking stock named Go.com for its online operations. NBC had an internet tracking stock as well. NBCi launched in 1999 -- back when GE (GE) owned NBC. Comcast (CMCSA) is now the parent of NBC.</p><p><blockquote>迪士尼(DIS)曾经有一只名为Go.com的跟踪股票，用于其在线业务。NBC也有一只互联网跟踪股票。NBCi于1999年推出，当时通用电气(GE)拥有NBC。康卡斯特(CMCSA)现在是NBC的母公司。</blockquote></p><p> CNN owner AT&amp;T (T) had a tracking stock for its new (at the time) wireless unit in the early 2000s. So did Sprint (now owned by T-Mobile (TMUS)) for its PCS wireless division.</p><p><blockquote>CNN所有者AT&amp;T(T)在2000年代初为其新的（当时的）无线部门持有跟踪股票。Sprint（现归T-Mobile(TMUS)所有）的PCS无线部门也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> None of these tracking stocks exist anymore.</p><p><blockquote>这些跟踪股票均已不复存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO and SPAC bubble and concerns about pricey valuations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO和SPAC泡沫以及对昂贵估值的担忧</b></blockquote></p><p> There were also plenty of unprofitable companies rushing to go public, despite having little in the way of revenue let alone profits.</p><p><blockquote>还有许多未盈利的公司争先恐后地上市，尽管它们几乎没有收入，更不用说利润了。</blockquote></p><p> The spectacular collapse of Pets.com stock after its IPO in February 2000 -- just before the Nasdaq peaked -- is still the poster child of wretched market excess.</p><p><blockquote>Pets.com股票在2000年2月首次公开募股后（就在纳斯达克见顶之前）的惊人暴跌仍然是市场过剩的典型代表。</blockquote></p><p> The good news for investors today is that many of the big unicorns going public via IPOs, SPACs or directly listing their shares on exchanges are not Pets.com 2.0. Airbnb, Palantir, DoorDash and many other recent stock debuts are industry leaders.</p><p><blockquote>今天对投资者来说，好消息是，许多通过IPO、SPAC或直接在交易所上市的大型独角兽公司都不是Pets.com 2.0。爱彼迎、Palantir、DoorDash和许多其他最近首次亮相的股票都是行业领导者。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the valuations for many of these stocks are certifiably insane considering that many of the companies are still not profitable -- even though their revenues are substantial and growing rapidly.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，考虑到许多公司仍然没有盈利——尽管它们的收入可观且增长迅速，但其中许多股票的估值确实是疯狂的。</blockquote></p><p> The prices for top tech stocks, even the FAANGs, Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla that currently dominate the S&amp;P 500, might be unjustifiably high as well.</p><p><blockquote>顶级科技股的价格，甚至是目前主导标普500的FAANG、微软（MSFT）和特斯拉，也可能过高。</blockquote></p><p> According to data from FactSet, the S&amp;P 500 is currently trading at more than 21 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months. That's above the five-year average of just under 18 and the 10-year average of nearly 16.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet的数据显示，这家标普500目前的市盈率超过未来12个月盈利预期的21倍。这高于略低于18岁的五年平均水平和近16岁的10年平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> It's also approaching the peak March 2000 levels of 24 times earnings estimates. In other words, the market is priced for perfection.</p><p><blockquote>它也接近2000年3月24倍盈利预期的峰值水平。换句话说，市场是为完美定价的。</blockquote></p><p> That's problematic. If (or when) the most bubbilicious stocks finally start to pull back, the sell-off can last a long time and the damage could be severe.</p><p><blockquote>这是有问题的。如果（或当）最具泡沫的股票最终开始回调，抛售可能会持续很长时间，损害可能会很严重。</blockquote></p><p> After all, when the Nasdaq first topped the 5,000 level in March 2000, it did so after surging past the 3,000 and 4,000 levels just a few months earlier. It was a mania. But once the dot-com bubble burst, the Nasdaq did not climb back above 5,000 again until March...2015.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，当纳斯达克在2000年3月首次突破5,000点时，它是在几个月前飙升至3,000点和4,000点之后才这样做的。这是一种狂热。但一旦互联网泡沫破裂，纳斯达克直到2015年3月才再次回升至5000点以上。</blockquote></p><p> So last year's brief bear market pullback following the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in March could be just a small taste of what's to come for tech and momentum stocks.</p><p><blockquote>因此，去年3月份Covid-19爆发后的短暂熊市回调可能只是科技股和动量股未来的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/09/investing/stocks-tech-spacs-ipos-bubble/index.html\">cnn</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/09/investing/stocks-tech-spacs-ipos-bubble/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160680775","content_text":"New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start of the year. That should have longtime market observers worried about the similarities between now and the height of the dot-com bubble in 2000.\nFor all those Millennial Robinhood traders who were just kids 20 years ago and are relative newbies to the market, the recent volatility should serve as a lesson. For all the times that people say that \"this time is different\" that's usually a telltale sign that it actually isn't.\nThe rise of meme stocks like GameStop (GME), the flurry of initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition company mergers as well as the stunning runs in Tesla (TSLA) and bitcoin (XBT) are nothing more than another case of the forces of market speculation running amok.\nInvestors are buying companies with significant challenges and ignoring the weak fundamentals. GameStop isn't the only \"meme\" stock out there. Movie theater chain AMC (AMC), clothing retailer Express (EXPR) and headphone maker Koss (KOSS) have been soaring.\nAnd all the talk about \"stonks\" and cryptocurrencies on Reddit and in TikTok videos isn't really that much different than people chattering about how high they thought Qualcomm (QCOM) and Cisco (CSCO) were going to go in the late 1990s on Raging Bull and Yahoo Finance message boards.\nThere are numerous other echoes to the tech craziness of the late 1990s.\nInvestors partying too much like 1999?\nBlank check SPAC mergers may not have been popular more than twenty years ago. But there was another hot financial trend at that time that was also a sign of market froth -- companies spinning off their online divisions or setting up so-called tracking stocks for them.\nBarnes and Noble, for example, trying to fight off competition from a still relatively new Amazon (AMZN), spun off its Barnesandnoble.com unit into a separately traded company in 1999. It was eventually folded back into the parent company.\nTracking stocks were even more ridiculous than dot-com spinoffs.\nWith a tracking stock, a company would sell shares of a business unit that merely tracked the performance of the division. But investors who owned the stock didn't have the right to vote on company matters like investors in other public companies did.\nDisney (DIS) used to have a tracking stock named Go.com for its online operations. NBC had an internet tracking stock as well. NBCi launched in 1999 -- back when GE (GE) owned NBC. Comcast (CMCSA) is now the parent of NBC.\nCNN owner AT&T (T) had a tracking stock for its new (at the time) wireless unit in the early 2000s. So did Sprint (now owned by T-Mobile (TMUS)) for its PCS wireless division.\nNone of these tracking stocks exist anymore.\nIPO and SPAC bubble and concerns about pricey valuations\nThere were also plenty of unprofitable companies rushing to go public, despite having little in the way of revenue let alone profits.\nThe spectacular collapse of Pets.com stock after its IPO in February 2000 -- just before the Nasdaq peaked -- is still the poster child of wretched market excess.\nThe good news for investors today is that many of the big unicorns going public via IPOs, SPACs or directly listing their shares on exchanges are not Pets.com 2.0. Airbnb, Palantir, DoorDash and many other recent stock debuts are industry leaders.\nStill, the valuations for many of these stocks are certifiably insane considering that many of the companies are still not profitable -- even though their revenues are substantial and growing rapidly.\nThe prices for top tech stocks, even the FAANGs, Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla that currently dominate the S&P 500, might be unjustifiably high as well.\nAccording to data from FactSet, the S&P 500 is currently trading at more than 21 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months. That's above the five-year average of just under 18 and the 10-year average of nearly 16.\nIt's also approaching the peak March 2000 levels of 24 times earnings estimates. In other words, the market is priced for perfection.\nThat's problematic. If (or when) the most bubbilicious stocks finally start to pull back, the sell-off can last a long time and the damage could be severe.\nAfter all, when the Nasdaq first topped the 5,000 level in March 2000, it did so after surging past the 3,000 and 4,000 levels just a few months earlier. It was a mania. But once the dot-com bubble burst, the Nasdaq did not climb back above 5,000 again until March...2015.\nSo last year's brief bear market pullback following the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in March could be just a small taste of what's to come for tech and momentum stocks.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":558,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329374878,"gmtCreate":1615213311894,"gmtModify":1703485750769,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wew","listText":"Wew","text":"Wew","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329374878","repostId":"1177988776","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":681,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329375612,"gmtCreate":1615213225936,"gmtModify":1703485749394,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wew","listText":"Wew","text":"Wew","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329375612","repostId":"1169408303","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169408303","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615212534,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169408303?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-08 22:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Entertainment stock surges after price target doubled at Wedbush<blockquote>韦德布什目标价翻倍后，AMC院线股价飙升</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169408303","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environmen","content":"<p>Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environment offset by concerns over debt burden</p><p><blockquote>分析师Michael Pachter维持中性评级，因为对大流行后环境日益增长的乐观情绪被对债务负担的担忧所抵消</blockquote></p><p> Shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. surged Monday, as the “meme” stock’s bounce from last month’s plunge continued, after Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter doubled his price target ahead of the company’s earnings report, citing an increasing optimism over the post-pandemic environment.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush分析师Michael Pachter在该公司财报发布前将目标价提高了一倍，理由是对大流行后环境日益乐观，AMC院线控股公司股价周一飙升，这只“模因”股票从上个月的暴跌中继续反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Pachter raised his target for the stock to $5.00 from $2.50, but that target was 38% below Friday’s closing price of $8.05. He reiterated the neutral rating he’s had on AMC since March 2020, however, saying it was “tough to get positive here, despite rising industry optimism.”</p><p><blockquote>Pachter将该股目标价从2.50美元上调至5.00美元，但该目标价较周五收盘价8.05美元低38%。不过，他重申了自2020年3月以来对AMC的中性评级，并表示“尽管行业乐观情绪不断上升，但很难乐观”。</blockquote></p><p> The movie theater chain’s stock&nbsp;rallied 5.5% in premarket trading. The stock edged up 0.5% last week, to post a third straight weekly gain. It hassoared 44.0% during that streak, which followed a two-week, 57.8% dive.</p><p><blockquote>这家连锁电影院的股价在盘前交易中上涨5.5%。该股上周小幅上涨0.5%，连续第三周上涨。在此期间，该股飙升了44.0%，此前两周暴跌57.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock had rocketed 525.5% in January, including a 301.2% jump to a more-than two-year closing high of $19.90 on Jan. 27,as part of the trading frenzy&nbsp;tracked to Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum, which targeted heavily shorted stocks.</p><p><blockquote>该股在1月份飙升了525.5%，其中1月27日飙升301.2%至两年多收盘高点19.90美元，这是Reddit WallStreetBets论坛追踪的交易狂潮的一部分，该论坛针对严重做空的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Wedbush’s Pachter said he thinks AMC has taken the right reopening precautions, such as installing high-quality air filtration systems, implementing enhanced cleaning protocols and reducing seating to allow for social distancing. He said that has allowed the company to boost attendance over the past several months, despite many of its markets being closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush的Pachter表示，他认为AMC已经采取了正确的重新开放预防措施，例如安装高质量的空气过滤系统、实施增强的清洁协议以及减少座位以保持社交距离。他说，尽管许多市场因COVID-19大流行而关闭，但这使得该公司在过去几个月里提高了上座率。</blockquote></p><p> In addition, Pachter said AMC has been able to raise enough liquidity through debt and equity offerings to last through midsummer without a big box office boost.</p><p><blockquote>此外，帕切特表示，AMC已经能够通过债务和股票发行筹集足够的流动性，以维持到仲夏，而不会出现票房大幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> “However, we think AMC may take years before it is able to revisit its prior growth strategy as it repays its growing mountain of debt,” Pachter wrote in a note to clients.</p><p><blockquote>帕切特在给客户的一份报告中写道：“然而，我们认为AMC可能需要数年时间才能重新审视之前的增长战略，以偿还不断增长的债务。”</blockquote></p><p> AMC is scheduled to report fourth-quarter results after Wednesday’s closing bell. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect the company to swing to a per-share loss of $3.36 from earnings of 35 cents a share in the year-ago period, while revenue is expected to drop 90% to $142.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>AMC定于周三收盘后公布第四季度业绩。FactSet调查的分析师预计，该公司将从去年同期每股收益35美分转为每股亏损3.36美元，而营收预计将下降90%至1.423亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Although the FactSet consensus for per-share losses has narrowed from $3.70 at the end of February, the revenue projection has declined from $155.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>尽管FactSet对每股亏损的共识较2月底的3.70美元有所收窄，但收入预测较1.551亿美元有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 8 analysts surveyed by FactSet, half have the equivalent of neutral ratings while the other half has the equivalent of sell ratings. The average price target is $2.51.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的8名分析师中，一半给予中性评级，另一半给予卖出评级。平均目标价为2.51美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock climbed 279.7% year to date, and has gained 77.7% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+1.95%has tacked on 2.3% this year and rallied 29.3% over the past year.</p><p><blockquote>AMC股价今年迄今已上涨279.7%，过去12个月上涨77.7%。相比之下，标普500指数SPX,+1.95%今年上涨了2.3%，去年上涨了29.3%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Entertainment stock surges after price target doubled at Wedbush<blockquote>韦德布什目标价翻倍后，AMC院线股价飙升</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Entertainment stock surges after price target doubled at Wedbush<blockquote>韦德布什目标价翻倍后，AMC院线股价飙升</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-08 22:08</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environment offset by concerns over debt burden</p><p><blockquote>分析师Michael Pachter维持中性评级，因为对大流行后环境日益增长的乐观情绪被对债务负担的担忧所抵消</blockquote></p><p> Shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. surged Monday, as the “meme” stock’s bounce from last month’s plunge continued, after Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter doubled his price target ahead of the company’s earnings report, citing an increasing optimism over the post-pandemic environment.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush分析师Michael Pachter在该公司财报发布前将目标价提高了一倍，理由是对大流行后环境日益乐观，AMC院线控股公司股价周一飙升，这只“模因”股票从上个月的暴跌中继续反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Pachter raised his target for the stock to $5.00 from $2.50, but that target was 38% below Friday’s closing price of $8.05. He reiterated the neutral rating he’s had on AMC since March 2020, however, saying it was “tough to get positive here, despite rising industry optimism.”</p><p><blockquote>Pachter将该股目标价从2.50美元上调至5.00美元，但该目标价较周五收盘价8.05美元低38%。不过，他重申了自2020年3月以来对AMC的中性评级，并表示“尽管行业乐观情绪不断上升，但很难乐观”。</blockquote></p><p> The movie theater chain’s stock&nbsp;rallied 5.5% in premarket trading. The stock edged up 0.5% last week, to post a third straight weekly gain. It hassoared 44.0% during that streak, which followed a two-week, 57.8% dive.</p><p><blockquote>这家连锁电影院的股价在盘前交易中上涨5.5%。该股上周小幅上涨0.5%，连续第三周上涨。在此期间，该股飙升了44.0%，此前两周暴跌57.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock had rocketed 525.5% in January, including a 301.2% jump to a more-than two-year closing high of $19.90 on Jan. 27,as part of the trading frenzy&nbsp;tracked to Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum, which targeted heavily shorted stocks.</p><p><blockquote>该股在1月份飙升了525.5%，其中1月27日飙升301.2%至两年多收盘高点19.90美元，这是Reddit WallStreetBets论坛追踪的交易狂潮的一部分，该论坛针对严重做空的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Wedbush’s Pachter said he thinks AMC has taken the right reopening precautions, such as installing high-quality air filtration systems, implementing enhanced cleaning protocols and reducing seating to allow for social distancing. He said that has allowed the company to boost attendance over the past several months, despite many of its markets being closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush的Pachter表示，他认为AMC已经采取了正确的重新开放预防措施，例如安装高质量的空气过滤系统、实施增强的清洁协议以及减少座位以保持社交距离。他说，尽管许多市场因COVID-19大流行而关闭，但这使得该公司在过去几个月里提高了上座率。</blockquote></p><p> In addition, Pachter said AMC has been able to raise enough liquidity through debt and equity offerings to last through midsummer without a big box office boost.</p><p><blockquote>此外，帕切特表示，AMC已经能够通过债务和股票发行筹集足够的流动性，以维持到仲夏，而不会出现票房大幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> “However, we think AMC may take years before it is able to revisit its prior growth strategy as it repays its growing mountain of debt,” Pachter wrote in a note to clients.</p><p><blockquote>帕切特在给客户的一份报告中写道：“然而，我们认为AMC可能需要数年时间才能重新审视之前的增长战略，以偿还不断增长的债务。”</blockquote></p><p> AMC is scheduled to report fourth-quarter results after Wednesday’s closing bell. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect the company to swing to a per-share loss of $3.36 from earnings of 35 cents a share in the year-ago period, while revenue is expected to drop 90% to $142.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>AMC定于周三收盘后公布第四季度业绩。FactSet调查的分析师预计，该公司将从去年同期每股收益35美分转为每股亏损3.36美元，而营收预计将下降90%至1.423亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Although the FactSet consensus for per-share losses has narrowed from $3.70 at the end of February, the revenue projection has declined from $155.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>尽管FactSet对每股亏损的共识较2月底的3.70美元有所收窄，但收入预测较1.551亿美元有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 8 analysts surveyed by FactSet, half have the equivalent of neutral ratings while the other half has the equivalent of sell ratings. The average price target is $2.51.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的8名分析师中，一半给予中性评级，另一半给予卖出评级。平均目标价为2.51美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock climbed 279.7% year to date, and has gained 77.7% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+1.95%has tacked on 2.3% this year and rallied 29.3% over the past year.</p><p><blockquote>AMC股价今年迄今已上涨279.7%，过去12个月上涨77.7%。相比之下，标普500指数SPX,+1.95%今年上涨了2.3%，去年上涨了29.3%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amc-entertainment-stock-surges-after-price-target-doubled-at-wedbush-11615210818?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amc-entertainment-stock-surges-after-price-target-doubled-at-wedbush-11615210818?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1169408303","content_text":"Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environment offset by concerns over debt burden\nShares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. surged Monday, as the “meme” stock’s bounce from last month’s plunge continued, after Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter doubled his price target ahead of the company’s earnings report, citing an increasing optimism over the post-pandemic environment.\nPachter raised his target for the stock to $5.00 from $2.50, but that target was 38% below Friday’s closing price of $8.05. He reiterated the neutral rating he’s had on AMC since March 2020, however, saying it was “tough to get positive here, despite rising industry optimism.”\nThe movie theater chain’s stock rallied 5.5% in premarket trading. The stock edged up 0.5% last week, to post a third straight weekly gain. It hassoared 44.0% during that streak, which followed a two-week, 57.8% dive.\nThe stock had rocketed 525.5% in January, including a 301.2% jump to a more-than two-year closing high of $19.90 on Jan. 27,as part of the trading frenzy tracked to Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum, which targeted heavily shorted stocks.\nWedbush’s Pachter said he thinks AMC has taken the right reopening precautions, such as installing high-quality air filtration systems, implementing enhanced cleaning protocols and reducing seating to allow for social distancing. He said that has allowed the company to boost attendance over the past several months, despite many of its markets being closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.\nIn addition, Pachter said AMC has been able to raise enough liquidity through debt and equity offerings to last through midsummer without a big box office boost.\n“However, we think AMC may take years before it is able to revisit its prior growth strategy as it repays its growing mountain of debt,” Pachter wrote in a note to clients.\nAMC is scheduled to report fourth-quarter results after Wednesday’s closing bell. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect the company to swing to a per-share loss of $3.36 from earnings of 35 cents a share in the year-ago period, while revenue is expected to drop 90% to $142.3 million.\nAlthough the FactSet consensus for per-share losses has narrowed from $3.70 at the end of February, the revenue projection has declined from $155.1 million.\nOf the 8 analysts surveyed by FactSet, half have the equivalent of neutral ratings while the other half has the equivalent of sell ratings. The average price target is $2.51.\nAMC’s stock climbed 279.7% year to date, and has gained 77.7% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the S&P 500 indexSPX,+1.95%has tacked on 2.3% this year and rallied 29.3% over the past year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":834,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":323589344,"gmtCreate":1615355264088,"gmtModify":1703487803263,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Meh","listText":"Meh","text":"Meh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323589344","repostId":"1160680775","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160680775","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615348263,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1160680775?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-10 11:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The 2021 stock market looks an awful lot like 2000. That's bad news for Big Tech<blockquote>2021年的股市看起来与2000年非常相似。这对大型科技公司来说是个坏消息</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160680775","media":"cnn","summary":"New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start ","content":"<p>New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start of the year. That should have longtime market observers worried about the similarities between now and the height of the dot-com bubble in 2000.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN Business）科技股在年初大幅飙升后，最近又出现了回调。这应该会让长期的市场观察人士担心现在与2000年互联网泡沫顶峰时期的相似之处。</blockquote></p><p> For all those Millennial Robinhood traders who were just kids 20 years ago and are relative newbies to the market, the recent volatility should serve as a lesson. For all the times that people say that \"this time is different\" that's usually a telltale sign that it actually isn't.</p><p><blockquote>对于所有那些20年前还是孩子、市场相对新手的千禧一代Robinhood交易者来说，最近的波动应该成为一个教训。尽管人们总是说“这次不同了”，但这通常是一个信号，表明事实并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> The rise of meme stocks like GameStop (GME), the flurry of initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition company mergers as well as the stunning runs in Tesla (TSLA) and bitcoin (XBT) are nothing more than another case of the forces of market speculation running amok.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站（GME）等模因股票的崛起、一系列首次公开募股和特殊目的收购公司合并，以及特斯拉（TSLA）和比特币（XBT）的惊人表现，只不过是市场投机力量的又一个例子。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are buying companies with significant challenges and ignoring the weak fundamentals. GameStop isn't the only \"meme\" stock out there. Movie theater chain AMC (AMC), clothing retailer Express (EXPR) and headphone maker Koss (KOSS) have been soaring.</p><p><blockquote>投资者正在购买面临重大挑战的公司，而忽视了疲软的基本面。游戏驿站并不是唯一的“模因”股票。连锁影院AMC(AMC)、服装零售商Express(EXPR)和耳机制造商Koss(KOSS)的股价一直在飙升。</blockquote></p><p> And all the talk about \"stonks\" and cryptocurrencies on Reddit and in TikTok videos isn't really that much different than people chattering about how high they thought Qualcomm (QCOM) and Cisco (CSCO) were going to go in the late 1990s on Raging Bull and Yahoo Finance message boards.</p><p><blockquote>Reddit和TikTok视频中所有关于“stonks”和加密货币的讨论实际上与人们在Raging Bull和雅虎财经留言板上喋喋不休地谈论他们认为高通(QCOM)和思科(CSCO)在20世纪90年代末会达到多高没有太大区别。</blockquote></p><p> There are numerous other echoes to the tech craziness of the late 1990s.</p><p><blockquote>20世纪90年代末的科技疯狂还有许多其他的回声。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Investors partying too much like 1999?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资者聚会太像1999年了？</b></blockquote></p><p> Blank check SPAC mergers may not have been popular more than twenty years ago. But there was another hot financial trend at that time that was also a sign of market froth -- companies spinning off their online divisions or setting up so-called tracking stocks for them.</p><p><blockquote>空白支票SPAC合并在二十多年前可能并不流行。但当时还有另一个炙手可热的金融趋势也是市场泡沫的标志——公司剥离其在线部门或为其设立所谓的跟踪股票。</blockquote></p><p> Barnes and Noble, for example, trying to fight off competition from a still relatively new Amazon (AMZN), spun off its Barnesandnoble.com unit into a separately traded company in 1999. It was eventually folded back into the parent company.</p><p><blockquote>例如，Barnes and Noble为了抵御来自相对较新的亚马逊(AMZN)的竞争，于1999年将其Barnesandnoble.com部门分拆为一家独立上市的公司。它最终被收归母公司。</blockquote></p><p> Tracking stocks were even more ridiculous than dot-com spinoffs.</p><p><blockquote>跟踪股票甚至比互联网公司的分拆更荒谬。</blockquote></p><p> With a tracking stock, a company would sell shares of a business unit that merely tracked the performance of the division. But investors who owned the stock didn't have the right to vote on company matters like investors in other public companies did.</p><p><blockquote>通过跟踪股票，公司将出售仅跟踪该部门业绩的业务部门的股票。但拥有该股票的投资者没有权像其他上市公司的投资者那样对公司事务进行投票。</blockquote></p><p> Disney (DIS) used to have a tracking stock named Go.com for its online operations. NBC had an internet tracking stock as well. NBCi launched in 1999 -- back when GE (GE) owned NBC. Comcast (CMCSA) is now the parent of NBC.</p><p><blockquote>迪士尼(DIS)曾经有一只名为Go.com的跟踪股票，用于其在线业务。NBC也有一只互联网跟踪股票。NBCi于1999年推出，当时通用电气(GE)拥有NBC。康卡斯特(CMCSA)现在是NBC的母公司。</blockquote></p><p> CNN owner AT&amp;T (T) had a tracking stock for its new (at the time) wireless unit in the early 2000s. So did Sprint (now owned by T-Mobile (TMUS)) for its PCS wireless division.</p><p><blockquote>CNN所有者AT&amp;T(T)在2000年代初为其新的（当时的）无线部门持有跟踪股票。Sprint（现归T-Mobile(TMUS)所有）的PCS无线部门也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> None of these tracking stocks exist anymore.</p><p><blockquote>这些跟踪股票均已不复存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO and SPAC bubble and concerns about pricey valuations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO和SPAC泡沫以及对昂贵估值的担忧</b></blockquote></p><p> There were also plenty of unprofitable companies rushing to go public, despite having little in the way of revenue let alone profits.</p><p><blockquote>还有许多未盈利的公司争先恐后地上市，尽管它们几乎没有收入，更不用说利润了。</blockquote></p><p> The spectacular collapse of Pets.com stock after its IPO in February 2000 -- just before the Nasdaq peaked -- is still the poster child of wretched market excess.</p><p><blockquote>Pets.com股票在2000年2月首次公开募股后（就在纳斯达克见顶之前）的惊人暴跌仍然是市场过剩的典型代表。</blockquote></p><p> The good news for investors today is that many of the big unicorns going public via IPOs, SPACs or directly listing their shares on exchanges are not Pets.com 2.0. Airbnb, Palantir, DoorDash and many other recent stock debuts are industry leaders.</p><p><blockquote>今天对投资者来说，好消息是，许多通过IPO、SPAC或直接在交易所上市的大型独角兽公司都不是Pets.com 2.0。爱彼迎、Palantir、DoorDash和许多其他最近首次亮相的股票都是行业领导者。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the valuations for many of these stocks are certifiably insane considering that many of the companies are still not profitable -- even though their revenues are substantial and growing rapidly.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，考虑到许多公司仍然没有盈利——尽管它们的收入可观且增长迅速，但其中许多股票的估值确实是疯狂的。</blockquote></p><p> The prices for top tech stocks, even the FAANGs, Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla that currently dominate the S&amp;P 500, might be unjustifiably high as well.</p><p><blockquote>顶级科技股的价格，甚至是目前主导标普500的FAANG、微软（MSFT）和特斯拉，也可能过高。</blockquote></p><p> According to data from FactSet, the S&amp;P 500 is currently trading at more than 21 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months. That's above the five-year average of just under 18 and the 10-year average of nearly 16.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet的数据显示，这家标普500目前的市盈率超过未来12个月盈利预期的21倍。这高于略低于18岁的五年平均水平和近16岁的10年平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> It's also approaching the peak March 2000 levels of 24 times earnings estimates. In other words, the market is priced for perfection.</p><p><blockquote>它也接近2000年3月24倍盈利预期的峰值水平。换句话说，市场是为完美定价的。</blockquote></p><p> That's problematic. If (or when) the most bubbilicious stocks finally start to pull back, the sell-off can last a long time and the damage could be severe.</p><p><blockquote>这是有问题的。如果（或当）最具泡沫的股票最终开始回调，抛售可能会持续很长时间，损害可能会很严重。</blockquote></p><p> After all, when the Nasdaq first topped the 5,000 level in March 2000, it did so after surging past the 3,000 and 4,000 levels just a few months earlier. It was a mania. But once the dot-com bubble burst, the Nasdaq did not climb back above 5,000 again until March...2015.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，当纳斯达克在2000年3月首次突破5,000点时，它是在几个月前飙升至3,000点和4,000点之后才这样做的。这是一种狂热。但一旦互联网泡沫破裂，纳斯达克直到2015年3月才再次回升至5000点以上。</blockquote></p><p> So last year's brief bear market pullback following the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in March could be just a small taste of what's to come for tech and momentum stocks.</p><p><blockquote>因此，去年3月份Covid-19爆发后的短暂熊市回调可能只是科技股和动量股未来的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The 2021 stock market looks an awful lot like 2000. That's bad news for Big Tech<blockquote>2021年的股市看起来与2000年非常相似。这对大型科技公司来说是个坏消息</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe 2021 stock market looks an awful lot like 2000. That's bad news for Big Tech<blockquote>2021年的股市看起来与2000年非常相似。这对大型科技公司来说是个坏消息</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">cnn</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-10 11:51</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start of the year. That should have longtime market observers worried about the similarities between now and the height of the dot-com bubble in 2000.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN Business）科技股在年初大幅飙升后，最近又出现了回调。这应该会让长期的市场观察人士担心现在与2000年互联网泡沫顶峰时期的相似之处。</blockquote></p><p> For all those Millennial Robinhood traders who were just kids 20 years ago and are relative newbies to the market, the recent volatility should serve as a lesson. For all the times that people say that \"this time is different\" that's usually a telltale sign that it actually isn't.</p><p><blockquote>对于所有那些20年前还是孩子、市场相对新手的千禧一代Robinhood交易者来说，最近的波动应该成为一个教训。尽管人们总是说“这次不同了”，但这通常是一个信号，表明事实并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> The rise of meme stocks like GameStop (GME), the flurry of initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition company mergers as well as the stunning runs in Tesla (TSLA) and bitcoin (XBT) are nothing more than another case of the forces of market speculation running amok.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站（GME）等模因股票的崛起、一系列首次公开募股和特殊目的收购公司合并，以及特斯拉（TSLA）和比特币（XBT）的惊人表现，只不过是市场投机力量的又一个例子。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are buying companies with significant challenges and ignoring the weak fundamentals. GameStop isn't the only \"meme\" stock out there. Movie theater chain AMC (AMC), clothing retailer Express (EXPR) and headphone maker Koss (KOSS) have been soaring.</p><p><blockquote>投资者正在购买面临重大挑战的公司，而忽视了疲软的基本面。游戏驿站并不是唯一的“模因”股票。连锁影院AMC(AMC)、服装零售商Express(EXPR)和耳机制造商Koss(KOSS)的股价一直在飙升。</blockquote></p><p> And all the talk about \"stonks\" and cryptocurrencies on Reddit and in TikTok videos isn't really that much different than people chattering about how high they thought Qualcomm (QCOM) and Cisco (CSCO) were going to go in the late 1990s on Raging Bull and Yahoo Finance message boards.</p><p><blockquote>Reddit和TikTok视频中所有关于“stonks”和加密货币的讨论实际上与人们在Raging Bull和雅虎财经留言板上喋喋不休地谈论他们认为高通(QCOM)和思科(CSCO)在20世纪90年代末会达到多高没有太大区别。</blockquote></p><p> There are numerous other echoes to the tech craziness of the late 1990s.</p><p><blockquote>20世纪90年代末的科技疯狂还有许多其他的回声。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Investors partying too much like 1999?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资者聚会太像1999年了？</b></blockquote></p><p> Blank check SPAC mergers may not have been popular more than twenty years ago. But there was another hot financial trend at that time that was also a sign of market froth -- companies spinning off their online divisions or setting up so-called tracking stocks for them.</p><p><blockquote>空白支票SPAC合并在二十多年前可能并不流行。但当时还有另一个炙手可热的金融趋势也是市场泡沫的标志——公司剥离其在线部门或为其设立所谓的跟踪股票。</blockquote></p><p> Barnes and Noble, for example, trying to fight off competition from a still relatively new Amazon (AMZN), spun off its Barnesandnoble.com unit into a separately traded company in 1999. It was eventually folded back into the parent company.</p><p><blockquote>例如，Barnes and Noble为了抵御来自相对较新的亚马逊(AMZN)的竞争，于1999年将其Barnesandnoble.com部门分拆为一家独立上市的公司。它最终被收归母公司。</blockquote></p><p> Tracking stocks were even more ridiculous than dot-com spinoffs.</p><p><blockquote>跟踪股票甚至比互联网公司的分拆更荒谬。</blockquote></p><p> With a tracking stock, a company would sell shares of a business unit that merely tracked the performance of the division. But investors who owned the stock didn't have the right to vote on company matters like investors in other public companies did.</p><p><blockquote>通过跟踪股票，公司将出售仅跟踪该部门业绩的业务部门的股票。但拥有该股票的投资者没有权像其他上市公司的投资者那样对公司事务进行投票。</blockquote></p><p> Disney (DIS) used to have a tracking stock named Go.com for its online operations. NBC had an internet tracking stock as well. NBCi launched in 1999 -- back when GE (GE) owned NBC. Comcast (CMCSA) is now the parent of NBC.</p><p><blockquote>迪士尼(DIS)曾经有一只名为Go.com的跟踪股票，用于其在线业务。NBC也有一只互联网跟踪股票。NBCi于1999年推出，当时通用电气(GE)拥有NBC。康卡斯特(CMCSA)现在是NBC的母公司。</blockquote></p><p> CNN owner AT&amp;T (T) had a tracking stock for its new (at the time) wireless unit in the early 2000s. So did Sprint (now owned by T-Mobile (TMUS)) for its PCS wireless division.</p><p><blockquote>CNN所有者AT&amp;T(T)在2000年代初为其新的（当时的）无线部门持有跟踪股票。Sprint（现归T-Mobile(TMUS)所有）的PCS无线部门也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> None of these tracking stocks exist anymore.</p><p><blockquote>这些跟踪股票均已不复存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO and SPAC bubble and concerns about pricey valuations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO和SPAC泡沫以及对昂贵估值的担忧</b></blockquote></p><p> There were also plenty of unprofitable companies rushing to go public, despite having little in the way of revenue let alone profits.</p><p><blockquote>还有许多未盈利的公司争先恐后地上市，尽管它们几乎没有收入，更不用说利润了。</blockquote></p><p> The spectacular collapse of Pets.com stock after its IPO in February 2000 -- just before the Nasdaq peaked -- is still the poster child of wretched market excess.</p><p><blockquote>Pets.com股票在2000年2月首次公开募股后（就在纳斯达克见顶之前）的惊人暴跌仍然是市场过剩的典型代表。</blockquote></p><p> The good news for investors today is that many of the big unicorns going public via IPOs, SPACs or directly listing their shares on exchanges are not Pets.com 2.0. Airbnb, Palantir, DoorDash and many other recent stock debuts are industry leaders.</p><p><blockquote>今天对投资者来说，好消息是，许多通过IPO、SPAC或直接在交易所上市的大型独角兽公司都不是Pets.com 2.0。爱彼迎、Palantir、DoorDash和许多其他最近首次亮相的股票都是行业领导者。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the valuations for many of these stocks are certifiably insane considering that many of the companies are still not profitable -- even though their revenues are substantial and growing rapidly.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，考虑到许多公司仍然没有盈利——尽管它们的收入可观且增长迅速，但其中许多股票的估值确实是疯狂的。</blockquote></p><p> The prices for top tech stocks, even the FAANGs, Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla that currently dominate the S&amp;P 500, might be unjustifiably high as well.</p><p><blockquote>顶级科技股的价格，甚至是目前主导标普500的FAANG、微软（MSFT）和特斯拉，也可能过高。</blockquote></p><p> According to data from FactSet, the S&amp;P 500 is currently trading at more than 21 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months. That's above the five-year average of just under 18 and the 10-year average of nearly 16.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet的数据显示，这家标普500目前的市盈率超过未来12个月盈利预期的21倍。这高于略低于18岁的五年平均水平和近16岁的10年平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> It's also approaching the peak March 2000 levels of 24 times earnings estimates. In other words, the market is priced for perfection.</p><p><blockquote>它也接近2000年3月24倍盈利预期的峰值水平。换句话说，市场是为完美定价的。</blockquote></p><p> That's problematic. If (or when) the most bubbilicious stocks finally start to pull back, the sell-off can last a long time and the damage could be severe.</p><p><blockquote>这是有问题的。如果（或当）最具泡沫的股票最终开始回调，抛售可能会持续很长时间，损害可能会很严重。</blockquote></p><p> After all, when the Nasdaq first topped the 5,000 level in March 2000, it did so after surging past the 3,000 and 4,000 levels just a few months earlier. It was a mania. But once the dot-com bubble burst, the Nasdaq did not climb back above 5,000 again until March...2015.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，当纳斯达克在2000年3月首次突破5,000点时，它是在几个月前飙升至3,000点和4,000点之后才这样做的。这是一种狂热。但一旦互联网泡沫破裂，纳斯达克直到2015年3月才再次回升至5000点以上。</blockquote></p><p> So last year's brief bear market pullback following the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in March could be just a small taste of what's to come for tech and momentum stocks.</p><p><blockquote>因此，去年3月份Covid-19爆发后的短暂熊市回调可能只是科技股和动量股未来的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/09/investing/stocks-tech-spacs-ipos-bubble/index.html\">cnn</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/09/investing/stocks-tech-spacs-ipos-bubble/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160680775","content_text":"New York (CNN Business)The recent pullback in tech stocks followed a spectacular surge at the start of the year. That should have longtime market observers worried about the similarities between now and the height of the dot-com bubble in 2000.\nFor all those Millennial Robinhood traders who were just kids 20 years ago and are relative newbies to the market, the recent volatility should serve as a lesson. For all the times that people say that \"this time is different\" that's usually a telltale sign that it actually isn't.\nThe rise of meme stocks like GameStop (GME), the flurry of initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition company mergers as well as the stunning runs in Tesla (TSLA) and bitcoin (XBT) are nothing more than another case of the forces of market speculation running amok.\nInvestors are buying companies with significant challenges and ignoring the weak fundamentals. GameStop isn't the only \"meme\" stock out there. Movie theater chain AMC (AMC), clothing retailer Express (EXPR) and headphone maker Koss (KOSS) have been soaring.\nAnd all the talk about \"stonks\" and cryptocurrencies on Reddit and in TikTok videos isn't really that much different than people chattering about how high they thought Qualcomm (QCOM) and Cisco (CSCO) were going to go in the late 1990s on Raging Bull and Yahoo Finance message boards.\nThere are numerous other echoes to the tech craziness of the late 1990s.\nInvestors partying too much like 1999?\nBlank check SPAC mergers may not have been popular more than twenty years ago. But there was another hot financial trend at that time that was also a sign of market froth -- companies spinning off their online divisions or setting up so-called tracking stocks for them.\nBarnes and Noble, for example, trying to fight off competition from a still relatively new Amazon (AMZN), spun off its Barnesandnoble.com unit into a separately traded company in 1999. It was eventually folded back into the parent company.\nTracking stocks were even more ridiculous than dot-com spinoffs.\nWith a tracking stock, a company would sell shares of a business unit that merely tracked the performance of the division. But investors who owned the stock didn't have the right to vote on company matters like investors in other public companies did.\nDisney (DIS) used to have a tracking stock named Go.com for its online operations. NBC had an internet tracking stock as well. NBCi launched in 1999 -- back when GE (GE) owned NBC. Comcast (CMCSA) is now the parent of NBC.\nCNN owner AT&T (T) had a tracking stock for its new (at the time) wireless unit in the early 2000s. So did Sprint (now owned by T-Mobile (TMUS)) for its PCS wireless division.\nNone of these tracking stocks exist anymore.\nIPO and SPAC bubble and concerns about pricey valuations\nThere were also plenty of unprofitable companies rushing to go public, despite having little in the way of revenue let alone profits.\nThe spectacular collapse of Pets.com stock after its IPO in February 2000 -- just before the Nasdaq peaked -- is still the poster child of wretched market excess.\nThe good news for investors today is that many of the big unicorns going public via IPOs, SPACs or directly listing their shares on exchanges are not Pets.com 2.0. Airbnb, Palantir, DoorDash and many other recent stock debuts are industry leaders.\nStill, the valuations for many of these stocks are certifiably insane considering that many of the companies are still not profitable -- even though their revenues are substantial and growing rapidly.\nThe prices for top tech stocks, even the FAANGs, Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla that currently dominate the S&P 500, might be unjustifiably high as well.\nAccording to data from FactSet, the S&P 500 is currently trading at more than 21 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months. That's above the five-year average of just under 18 and the 10-year average of nearly 16.\nIt's also approaching the peak March 2000 levels of 24 times earnings estimates. In other words, the market is priced for perfection.\nThat's problematic. If (or when) the most bubbilicious stocks finally start to pull back, the sell-off can last a long time and the damage could be severe.\nAfter all, when the Nasdaq first topped the 5,000 level in March 2000, it did so after surging past the 3,000 and 4,000 levels just a few months earlier. It was a mania. But once the dot-com bubble burst, the Nasdaq did not climb back above 5,000 again until March...2015.\nSo last year's brief bear market pullback following the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in March could be just a small taste of what's to come for tech and momentum stocks.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":558,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328127608,"gmtCreate":1615508148804,"gmtModify":1703490107255,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328127608","repostId":"2118931018","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":727,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329374878,"gmtCreate":1615213311894,"gmtModify":1703485750769,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wew","listText":"Wew","text":"Wew","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329374878","repostId":"1177988776","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":681,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329375612,"gmtCreate":1615213225936,"gmtModify":1703485749394,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wew","listText":"Wew","text":"Wew","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329375612","repostId":"1169408303","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169408303","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615212534,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169408303?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-08 22:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Entertainment stock surges after price target doubled at Wedbush<blockquote>韦德布什目标价翻倍后，AMC院线股价飙升</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169408303","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environmen","content":"<p>Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environment offset by concerns over debt burden</p><p><blockquote>分析师Michael Pachter维持中性评级，因为对大流行后环境日益增长的乐观情绪被对债务负担的担忧所抵消</blockquote></p><p> Shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. surged Monday, as the “meme” stock’s bounce from last month’s plunge continued, after Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter doubled his price target ahead of the company’s earnings report, citing an increasing optimism over the post-pandemic environment.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush分析师Michael Pachter在该公司财报发布前将目标价提高了一倍，理由是对大流行后环境日益乐观，AMC院线控股公司股价周一飙升，这只“模因”股票从上个月的暴跌中继续反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Pachter raised his target for the stock to $5.00 from $2.50, but that target was 38% below Friday’s closing price of $8.05. He reiterated the neutral rating he’s had on AMC since March 2020, however, saying it was “tough to get positive here, despite rising industry optimism.”</p><p><blockquote>Pachter将该股目标价从2.50美元上调至5.00美元，但该目标价较周五收盘价8.05美元低38%。不过，他重申了自2020年3月以来对AMC的中性评级，并表示“尽管行业乐观情绪不断上升，但很难乐观”。</blockquote></p><p> The movie theater chain’s stock&nbsp;rallied 5.5% in premarket trading. The stock edged up 0.5% last week, to post a third straight weekly gain. It hassoared 44.0% during that streak, which followed a two-week, 57.8% dive.</p><p><blockquote>这家连锁电影院的股价在盘前交易中上涨5.5%。该股上周小幅上涨0.5%，连续第三周上涨。在此期间，该股飙升了44.0%，此前两周暴跌57.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock had rocketed 525.5% in January, including a 301.2% jump to a more-than two-year closing high of $19.90 on Jan. 27,as part of the trading frenzy&nbsp;tracked to Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum, which targeted heavily shorted stocks.</p><p><blockquote>该股在1月份飙升了525.5%，其中1月27日飙升301.2%至两年多收盘高点19.90美元，这是Reddit WallStreetBets论坛追踪的交易狂潮的一部分，该论坛针对严重做空的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Wedbush’s Pachter said he thinks AMC has taken the right reopening precautions, such as installing high-quality air filtration systems, implementing enhanced cleaning protocols and reducing seating to allow for social distancing. He said that has allowed the company to boost attendance over the past several months, despite many of its markets being closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush的Pachter表示，他认为AMC已经采取了正确的重新开放预防措施，例如安装高质量的空气过滤系统、实施增强的清洁协议以及减少座位以保持社交距离。他说，尽管许多市场因COVID-19大流行而关闭，但这使得该公司在过去几个月里提高了上座率。</blockquote></p><p> In addition, Pachter said AMC has been able to raise enough liquidity through debt and equity offerings to last through midsummer without a big box office boost.</p><p><blockquote>此外，帕切特表示，AMC已经能够通过债务和股票发行筹集足够的流动性，以维持到仲夏，而不会出现票房大幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> “However, we think AMC may take years before it is able to revisit its prior growth strategy as it repays its growing mountain of debt,” Pachter wrote in a note to clients.</p><p><blockquote>帕切特在给客户的一份报告中写道：“然而，我们认为AMC可能需要数年时间才能重新审视之前的增长战略，以偿还不断增长的债务。”</blockquote></p><p> AMC is scheduled to report fourth-quarter results after Wednesday’s closing bell. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect the company to swing to a per-share loss of $3.36 from earnings of 35 cents a share in the year-ago period, while revenue is expected to drop 90% to $142.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>AMC定于周三收盘后公布第四季度业绩。FactSet调查的分析师预计，该公司将从去年同期每股收益35美分转为每股亏损3.36美元，而营收预计将下降90%至1.423亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Although the FactSet consensus for per-share losses has narrowed from $3.70 at the end of February, the revenue projection has declined from $155.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>尽管FactSet对每股亏损的共识较2月底的3.70美元有所收窄，但收入预测较1.551亿美元有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 8 analysts surveyed by FactSet, half have the equivalent of neutral ratings while the other half has the equivalent of sell ratings. The average price target is $2.51.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的8名分析师中，一半给予中性评级，另一半给予卖出评级。平均目标价为2.51美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock climbed 279.7% year to date, and has gained 77.7% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+1.95%has tacked on 2.3% this year and rallied 29.3% over the past year.</p><p><blockquote>AMC股价今年迄今已上涨279.7%，过去12个月上涨77.7%。相比之下，标普500指数SPX,+1.95%今年上涨了2.3%，去年上涨了29.3%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Entertainment stock surges after price target doubled at Wedbush<blockquote>韦德布什目标价翻倍后，AMC院线股价飙升</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Entertainment stock surges after price target doubled at Wedbush<blockquote>韦德布什目标价翻倍后，AMC院线股价飙升</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-08 22:08</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environment offset by concerns over debt burden</p><p><blockquote>分析师Michael Pachter维持中性评级，因为对大流行后环境日益增长的乐观情绪被对债务负担的担忧所抵消</blockquote></p><p> Shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. surged Monday, as the “meme” stock’s bounce from last month’s plunge continued, after Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter doubled his price target ahead of the company’s earnings report, citing an increasing optimism over the post-pandemic environment.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush分析师Michael Pachter在该公司财报发布前将目标价提高了一倍，理由是对大流行后环境日益乐观，AMC院线控股公司股价周一飙升，这只“模因”股票从上个月的暴跌中继续反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Pachter raised his target for the stock to $5.00 from $2.50, but that target was 38% below Friday’s closing price of $8.05. He reiterated the neutral rating he’s had on AMC since March 2020, however, saying it was “tough to get positive here, despite rising industry optimism.”</p><p><blockquote>Pachter将该股目标价从2.50美元上调至5.00美元，但该目标价较周五收盘价8.05美元低38%。不过，他重申了自2020年3月以来对AMC的中性评级，并表示“尽管行业乐观情绪不断上升，但很难乐观”。</blockquote></p><p> The movie theater chain’s stock&nbsp;rallied 5.5% in premarket trading. The stock edged up 0.5% last week, to post a third straight weekly gain. It hassoared 44.0% during that streak, which followed a two-week, 57.8% dive.</p><p><blockquote>这家连锁电影院的股价在盘前交易中上涨5.5%。该股上周小幅上涨0.5%，连续第三周上涨。在此期间，该股飙升了44.0%，此前两周暴跌57.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock had rocketed 525.5% in January, including a 301.2% jump to a more-than two-year closing high of $19.90 on Jan. 27,as part of the trading frenzy&nbsp;tracked to Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum, which targeted heavily shorted stocks.</p><p><blockquote>该股在1月份飙升了525.5%，其中1月27日飙升301.2%至两年多收盘高点19.90美元，这是Reddit WallStreetBets论坛追踪的交易狂潮的一部分，该论坛针对严重做空的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Wedbush’s Pachter said he thinks AMC has taken the right reopening precautions, such as installing high-quality air filtration systems, implementing enhanced cleaning protocols and reducing seating to allow for social distancing. He said that has allowed the company to boost attendance over the past several months, despite many of its markets being closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>Wedbush的Pachter表示，他认为AMC已经采取了正确的重新开放预防措施，例如安装高质量的空气过滤系统、实施增强的清洁协议以及减少座位以保持社交距离。他说，尽管许多市场因COVID-19大流行而关闭，但这使得该公司在过去几个月里提高了上座率。</blockquote></p><p> In addition, Pachter said AMC has been able to raise enough liquidity through debt and equity offerings to last through midsummer without a big box office boost.</p><p><blockquote>此外，帕切特表示，AMC已经能够通过债务和股票发行筹集足够的流动性，以维持到仲夏，而不会出现票房大幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> “However, we think AMC may take years before it is able to revisit its prior growth strategy as it repays its growing mountain of debt,” Pachter wrote in a note to clients.</p><p><blockquote>帕切特在给客户的一份报告中写道：“然而，我们认为AMC可能需要数年时间才能重新审视之前的增长战略，以偿还不断增长的债务。”</blockquote></p><p> AMC is scheduled to report fourth-quarter results after Wednesday’s closing bell. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect the company to swing to a per-share loss of $3.36 from earnings of 35 cents a share in the year-ago period, while revenue is expected to drop 90% to $142.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>AMC定于周三收盘后公布第四季度业绩。FactSet调查的分析师预计，该公司将从去年同期每股收益35美分转为每股亏损3.36美元，而营收预计将下降90%至1.423亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Although the FactSet consensus for per-share losses has narrowed from $3.70 at the end of February, the revenue projection has declined from $155.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>尽管FactSet对每股亏损的共识较2月底的3.70美元有所收窄，但收入预测较1.551亿美元有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 8 analysts surveyed by FactSet, half have the equivalent of neutral ratings while the other half has the equivalent of sell ratings. The average price target is $2.51.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的8名分析师中，一半给予中性评级，另一半给予卖出评级。平均目标价为2.51美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock climbed 279.7% year to date, and has gained 77.7% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+1.95%has tacked on 2.3% this year and rallied 29.3% over the past year.</p><p><blockquote>AMC股价今年迄今已上涨279.7%，过去12个月上涨77.7%。相比之下，标普500指数SPX,+1.95%今年上涨了2.3%，去年上涨了29.3%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amc-entertainment-stock-surges-after-price-target-doubled-at-wedbush-11615210818?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amc-entertainment-stock-surges-after-price-target-doubled-at-wedbush-11615210818?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1169408303","content_text":"Analyst Michael Pachter kept rating at neutral, as increasing optimism over post-pandemic environment offset by concerns over debt burden\nShares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. surged Monday, as the “meme” stock’s bounce from last month’s plunge continued, after Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter doubled his price target ahead of the company’s earnings report, citing an increasing optimism over the post-pandemic environment.\nPachter raised his target for the stock to $5.00 from $2.50, but that target was 38% below Friday’s closing price of $8.05. He reiterated the neutral rating he’s had on AMC since March 2020, however, saying it was “tough to get positive here, despite rising industry optimism.”\nThe movie theater chain’s stock rallied 5.5% in premarket trading. The stock edged up 0.5% last week, to post a third straight weekly gain. It hassoared 44.0% during that streak, which followed a two-week, 57.8% dive.\nThe stock had rocketed 525.5% in January, including a 301.2% jump to a more-than two-year closing high of $19.90 on Jan. 27,as part of the trading frenzy tracked to Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum, which targeted heavily shorted stocks.\nWedbush’s Pachter said he thinks AMC has taken the right reopening precautions, such as installing high-quality air filtration systems, implementing enhanced cleaning protocols and reducing seating to allow for social distancing. He said that has allowed the company to boost attendance over the past several months, despite many of its markets being closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.\nIn addition, Pachter said AMC has been able to raise enough liquidity through debt and equity offerings to last through midsummer without a big box office boost.\n“However, we think AMC may take years before it is able to revisit its prior growth strategy as it repays its growing mountain of debt,” Pachter wrote in a note to clients.\nAMC is scheduled to report fourth-quarter results after Wednesday’s closing bell. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect the company to swing to a per-share loss of $3.36 from earnings of 35 cents a share in the year-ago period, while revenue is expected to drop 90% to $142.3 million.\nAlthough the FactSet consensus for per-share losses has narrowed from $3.70 at the end of February, the revenue projection has declined from $155.1 million.\nOf the 8 analysts surveyed by FactSet, half have the equivalent of neutral ratings while the other half has the equivalent of sell ratings. The average price target is $2.51.\nAMC’s stock climbed 279.7% year to date, and has gained 77.7% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the S&P 500 indexSPX,+1.95%has tacked on 2.3% this year and rallied 29.3% over the past year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":834,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":326087961,"gmtCreate":1615564902253,"gmtModify":1703491088214,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Damn","listText":"Damn","text":"Damn","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/326087961","repostId":"1100128328","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1100128328","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615563404,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1100128328?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-12 23:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Stock Is Down. You Could Blame Joe Biden.<blockquote>特斯拉股价下跌。你可以责怪乔·拜登。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100128328","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stock inTesla is lower after CNBC reported that the electric-vehicle company had a firein its Fremon","content":"<p>Stock inTesla&nbsp;is lower after CNBC reported that the&nbsp;electric-vehicle&nbsp;company&nbsp;had a firein its Fremont, Calif. plant, but the blaze probably isn’t the reason for the dip.</p><p><blockquote>CNBC报道电动汽车公司特斯拉在加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特发生火灾后，该公司股价走低。植物，但大火可能不是下降的原因。</blockquote></p><p>Fires are just a normal, albeit unfortunate, operating problem for any manufacturer. Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the fire or the damage it may have caused.</p><p><blockquote>对于任何制造商来说，火灾只是一个正常但不幸的操作问题。特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）没有立即回应有关火灾或火灾可能造成的损失的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p>President Joe Biden is probably responsible for the share-price decline, which left the stock about 2.7% lower in premarket trading, at about $680. It has beena wild weekfor Tesla stockholders. Shares started off the week at about $675,traded above $700and fell to about $560 before bounding back, up 4.7% Thursday, to just under $700.</p><p><blockquote>总统乔·拜登可能对股价下跌负有责任，该股在盘前交易中下跌约2.7%，至约680美元。对于特斯拉股东来说，这是疯狂的一周。本周初股价约为675美元，交易价格高于700美元，跌至约560美元，然后反弹，周四上涨4.7%，至略低于700美元。</blockquote></p><p>Nothing Tesla has done appears to be the reason for the recent volatility. It’s all about interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉所做的一切似乎都不是最近波动的原因。一切都与利率有关。</blockquote></p><p>That is where the president comes into the picture. Thursday evening, he addressed the nation, focusing on putting Covid-19 in the rearview mirror a year after the World Health Organization declared that a pandemic had begun.</p><p><blockquote>这就是总统发挥作用的地方。周四晚上，他向全国发表讲话，重点是在世界卫生组织宣布疫情已经开始一年后，将新冠肺炎(Covid-19)抛在脑后。</blockquote></p><p>“All adult Americans will be eligible to get a vaccine no later than May 1,” said the president, adding the federal government is setting up hundreds of vaccination sites and procuring millions more vaccine doses.</p><p><blockquote>总统说：“所有成年美国人都有资格在5月1日之前接种疫苗。”他补充说，联邦政府正在建立数百个疫苗接种点，并采购数百万剂疫苗。</blockquote></p><p>It’s good news, but the market is selling off Friday morning. For stocks, the speech represents almost too much of a good thing. The economy is reopening and, as a result,bond yields are rising, putting pressure on high-growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>这是个好消息，但周五早上市场正在抛售。对于股票来说，这次讲话几乎代表了太多的好事。经济正在重新开放，因此债券收益率正在上升，给高增长股票带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>Futures on the&nbsp;Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;Index, home to many highflying tech stocks, are down 1.6%.Dow Jones Industrial Averagefutures, on the other hand, are flat.</p><p><blockquote>拥有许多飙升的科技股的纳斯达克综合指数期货下跌1.6%。另一方面，道琼斯工业平均指数期货持平。</blockquote></p><p>Higher yields hurt richly valued, fast-growing companies more than others for a couple of reasons. One, they makes funding growth more expensive. Two, high- growth companies are expected generate most of their cash far in the future. That cash is a little less valuable in present terms when rates are high, compared with when rates are low. In a higher-rate environment, investors have more options to earn interest today, which puts pressure on high-growth stocks’ valuations.</p><p><blockquote>较高的收益率对估值高、快速增长的公司的伤害比其他公司更大，原因有几个。第一，它们使融资增长更加昂贵。第二，高增长公司预计将在未来产生大部分现金。与利率低时相比，利率高时现金的价值较低。在利率较高的环境下，投资者如今有更多赚取利息的选择，这给高增长股票的估值带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>A Friday dip, however,doesn’t mean the end&nbsp;of the bull market in Tesla, EV stocks or the Nasdaq. Getting the economy back on its feet is a good thing. Investors just need a chance to adjust to the changing landscape.</p><p><blockquote>然而，周五的下跌并不意味着特斯拉、电动汽车股票或纳斯达克牛市的结束。让经济重新站稳脚跟是件好事。投资者只是需要一个机会来适应不断变化的环境。</blockquote></p><p>“There’s a good chance you, your families and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout …and celebrate Independence Day,” Biden said. That is great news.</p><p><blockquote>拜登说：“你、你的家人和朋友很有可能能够在你的后院或附近聚会，野餐……庆祝独立日。”这是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Stock Is Down. You Could Blame Joe Biden.<blockquote>特斯拉股价下跌。你可以责怪乔·拜登。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Stock Is Down. You Could Blame Joe Biden.<blockquote>特斯拉股价下跌。你可以责怪乔·拜登。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-12 23:36</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stock inTesla&nbsp;is lower after CNBC reported that the&nbsp;electric-vehicle&nbsp;company&nbsp;had a firein its Fremont, Calif. plant, but the blaze probably isn’t the reason for the dip.</p><p><blockquote>CNBC报道电动汽车公司特斯拉在加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特发生火灾后，该公司股价走低。植物，但大火可能不是下降的原因。</blockquote></p><p>Fires are just a normal, albeit unfortunate, operating problem for any manufacturer. Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the fire or the damage it may have caused.</p><p><blockquote>对于任何制造商来说，火灾只是一个正常但不幸的操作问题。特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）没有立即回应有关火灾或火灾可能造成的损失的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p>President Joe Biden is probably responsible for the share-price decline, which left the stock about 2.7% lower in premarket trading, at about $680. It has beena wild weekfor Tesla stockholders. Shares started off the week at about $675,traded above $700and fell to about $560 before bounding back, up 4.7% Thursday, to just under $700.</p><p><blockquote>总统乔·拜登可能对股价下跌负有责任，该股在盘前交易中下跌约2.7%，至约680美元。对于特斯拉股东来说，这是疯狂的一周。本周初股价约为675美元，交易价格高于700美元，跌至约560美元，然后反弹，周四上涨4.7%，至略低于700美元。</blockquote></p><p>Nothing Tesla has done appears to be the reason for the recent volatility. It’s all about interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉所做的一切似乎都不是最近波动的原因。一切都与利率有关。</blockquote></p><p>That is where the president comes into the picture. Thursday evening, he addressed the nation, focusing on putting Covid-19 in the rearview mirror a year after the World Health Organization declared that a pandemic had begun.</p><p><blockquote>这就是总统发挥作用的地方。周四晚上，他向全国发表讲话，重点是在世界卫生组织宣布疫情已经开始一年后，将新冠肺炎(Covid-19)抛在脑后。</blockquote></p><p>“All adult Americans will be eligible to get a vaccine no later than May 1,” said the president, adding the federal government is setting up hundreds of vaccination sites and procuring millions more vaccine doses.</p><p><blockquote>总统说：“所有成年美国人都有资格在5月1日之前接种疫苗。”他补充说，联邦政府正在建立数百个疫苗接种点，并采购数百万剂疫苗。</blockquote></p><p>It’s good news, but the market is selling off Friday morning. For stocks, the speech represents almost too much of a good thing. The economy is reopening and, as a result,bond yields are rising, putting pressure on high-growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>这是个好消息，但周五早上市场正在抛售。对于股票来说，这次讲话几乎代表了太多的好事。经济正在重新开放，因此债券收益率正在上升，给高增长股票带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>Futures on the&nbsp;Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;Index, home to many highflying tech stocks, are down 1.6%.Dow Jones Industrial Averagefutures, on the other hand, are flat.</p><p><blockquote>拥有许多飙升的科技股的纳斯达克综合指数期货下跌1.6%。另一方面，道琼斯工业平均指数期货持平。</blockquote></p><p>Higher yields hurt richly valued, fast-growing companies more than others for a couple of reasons. One, they makes funding growth more expensive. Two, high- growth companies are expected generate most of their cash far in the future. That cash is a little less valuable in present terms when rates are high, compared with when rates are low. In a higher-rate environment, investors have more options to earn interest today, which puts pressure on high-growth stocks’ valuations.</p><p><blockquote>较高的收益率对估值高、快速增长的公司的伤害比其他公司更大，原因有几个。第一，它们使融资增长更加昂贵。第二，高增长公司预计将在未来产生大部分现金。与利率低时相比，利率高时现金的价值较低。在利率较高的环境下，投资者如今有更多赚取利息的选择，这给高增长股票的估值带来压力。</blockquote></p><p>A Friday dip, however,doesn’t mean the end&nbsp;of the bull market in Tesla, EV stocks or the Nasdaq. Getting the economy back on its feet is a good thing. Investors just need a chance to adjust to the changing landscape.</p><p><blockquote>然而，周五的下跌并不意味着特斯拉、电动汽车股票或纳斯达克牛市的结束。让经济重新站稳脚跟是件好事。投资者只是需要一个机会来适应不断变化的环境。</blockquote></p><p>“There’s a good chance you, your families and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout …and celebrate Independence Day,” Biden said. That is great news.</p><p><blockquote>拜登说：“你、你的家人和朋友很有可能能够在你的后院或附近聚会，野餐……庆祝独立日。”这是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-is-down-you-could-blame-joe-biden-51615557806?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-is-down-you-could-blame-joe-biden-51615557806?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100128328","content_text":"Stock inTesla is lower after CNBC reported that the electric-vehicle company had a firein its Fremont, Calif. plant, but the blaze probably isn’t the reason for the dip.Fires are just a normal, albeit unfortunate, operating problem for any manufacturer. Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the fire or the damage it may have caused.President Joe Biden is probably responsible for the share-price decline, which left the stock about 2.7% lower in premarket trading, at about $680. It has beena wild weekfor Tesla stockholders. Shares started off the week at about $675,traded above $700and fell to about $560 before bounding back, up 4.7% Thursday, to just under $700.Nothing Tesla has done appears to be the reason for the recent volatility. It’s all about interest rates.That is where the president comes into the picture. Thursday evening, he addressed the nation, focusing on putting Covid-19 in the rearview mirror a year after the World Health Organization declared that a pandemic had begun.“All adult Americans will be eligible to get a vaccine no later than May 1,” said the president, adding the federal government is setting up hundreds of vaccination sites and procuring millions more vaccine doses.It’s good news, but the market is selling off Friday morning. For stocks, the speech represents almost too much of a good thing. The economy is reopening and, as a result,bond yields are rising, putting pressure on high-growth stocks.Futures on the Nasdaq Composite Index, home to many highflying tech stocks, are down 1.6%.Dow Jones Industrial Averagefutures, on the other hand, are flat.Higher yields hurt richly valued, fast-growing companies more than others for a couple of reasons. One, they makes funding growth more expensive. Two, high- growth companies are expected generate most of their cash far in the future. That cash is a little less valuable in present terms when rates are high, compared with when rates are low. In a higher-rate environment, investors have more options to earn interest today, which puts pressure on high-growth stocks’ valuations.A Friday dip, however,doesn’t mean the end of the bull market in Tesla, EV stocks or the Nasdaq. Getting the economy back on its feet is a good thing. Investors just need a chance to adjust to the changing landscape.“There’s a good chance you, your families and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout …and celebrate Independence Day,” Biden said. That is great news.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":606,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321582718,"gmtCreate":1615453206034,"gmtModify":1703489222408,"author":{"id":"3569583977305666","authorId":"3569583977305666","name":"NatxEJ","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569583977305666","idStr":"3569583977305666"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"...","listText":"...","text":"...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/321582718","repostId":"1156309857","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":775,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}