YHY73的个人主页 - 老虎社区

YHY73

YHY73

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

3关注

1粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-05-13

Wow.... still don’t understand how he can link bitcoins mining to fossil fuels. Anyone care to explain?Maybe he wants to accumulate more at super low price. 😜

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-26

Market correction is always healthy.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-01

Money, money and more money!! 😂

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-25

Hahaha, Who can predict the price of Bitcoin in the future? 😂

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-18

Economy pick up, good? If inflation goes up, which is better, stocks or bonds?

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-18

Fed has stated their position, and market is happy with it. 😂

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-17

Market is seems like depending on Fed for next move. 😅

Easy Money, the Dot Plot, and the Fed’s Dilemma: An Investor Guide to a Key Meeting<blockquote>宽松货币、点阵图和美联储的困境：重要会议的投资者指南</blockquote>

2021-03-12

Too much money, will only flow into stocks. :)

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-09

Correction is good and healthy.

Top tech stocks are in correction territory. Here's why<blockquote>顶级科技股正处于调整区域。原因如下</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573824362072096","uuid":"3573824362072096","gmtCreate":1610730657777,"gmtModify":1615269385909,"name":"YHY73","pinyin":"yhy73","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":9,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.83%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.15","exceedPercentage":"60.55%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.31","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":191217340,"gmtCreate":1620880502280,"gmtModify":1634195594347,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow.... still don’t understand&nbsp;how he can link bitcoins mining to fossil fuels. Anyone care to explain?Maybe he wants to accumulate more at super low price. 😜","listText":"Wow.... still don’t understand&nbsp;how he can link bitcoins mining to fossil fuels. Anyone care to explain?Maybe he wants to accumulate more at super low price. 😜","text":"Wow.... still don’t understand how he can link bitcoins mining to fossil fuels. Anyone care to explain?Maybe he wants to accumulate more at super low price. 😜","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/191217340","repostId":"1123539919","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1528,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374380921,"gmtCreate":1619418749163,"gmtModify":1634273631761,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market correction is always healthy.&nbsp;","listText":"Market correction is always healthy.&nbsp;","text":"Market correction is always healthy.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/374380921","repostId":"1158968268","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1679,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357185457,"gmtCreate":1617246830679,"gmtModify":1634521821979,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Money, money and more money!! 😂","listText":"Money, money and more money!! 😂","text":"Money, money and more money!! 😂","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357185457","repostId":"1172735914","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2053,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351487117,"gmtCreate":1616626624139,"gmtModify":1634524899190,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hahaha,&nbsp;Who can predict the price of Bitcoin in the future? 😂","listText":"Hahaha,&nbsp;Who can predict the price of Bitcoin in the future? 😂","text":"Hahaha, Who can predict the price of Bitcoin in the future? 😂","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351487117","repostId":"2121457670","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1588,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327128921,"gmtCreate":1616071907063,"gmtModify":1634527392484,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Economy pick up, good? If inflation goes up, which is better, stocks or bonds?","listText":"Economy pick up, good? If inflation goes up, which is better, stocks or bonds?","text":"Economy pick up, good? If inflation goes up, which is better, stocks or bonds?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327128921","repostId":"2120308231","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1642,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327904493,"gmtCreate":1616045517412,"gmtModify":1703496830771,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fed has stated&nbsp;their position, and market is happy with it. 😂","listText":"Fed has stated&nbsp;their position, and market is happy with it. 😂","text":"Fed has stated their position, and market is happy with it. 😂","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327904493","repostId":"1190013109","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1588,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324381115,"gmtCreate":1615963809237,"gmtModify":1703495596253,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market is seems like depending on Fed for next move. 😅","listText":"Market is seems like depending on Fed for next move. 😅","text":"Market is seems like depending on Fed for next move. 😅","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/324381115","repostId":"1103121082","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103121082","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615948559,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103121082?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-17 10:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Easy Money, the Dot Plot, and the Fed’s Dilemma: An Investor Guide to a Key Meeting<blockquote>宽松货币、点阵图和美联储的困境：重要会议的投资者指南</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103121082","media":"Barrons","summary":"The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter ec","content":"<p>The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter economic forecasts while trying to assure investors that it is still “not thinking about thinking about” lifting interest rates—and that it doesn’t need to.</p><p><blockquote>美联储本周面临着一个尴尬的平衡行为：它可能会立即发布更光明的经济预测，同时试图向投资者保证它仍然“不考虑考虑”加息——而且也不需要加息。</blockquote></p><p> More-optimistic estimates for gross domestic product, unemployment and inflation would typically prompt an acknowledgement that monetary policy would, in turn, begin to tighten. For a data-dependent Fed, the message that the economy is improving much faster than expected is at odds with the message that rates will remain near zero through 2023. How the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy arm, tries to square those conflicting dynamics will be in focus as investors take in new economic forecasts, the dot plot showing updated rate predictions, and Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference.</p><p><blockquote>对国内生产总值、失业率和通胀的更乐观估计通常会促使人们承认货币政策将反过来开始收紧。对于依赖数据的美联储来说，经济改善速度远快于预期的信息与利率将在2023年之前保持在接近零的信息不一致。随着投资者接受新的经济预测、显示最新利率预测的点阵图以及主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的新闻发布会，美联储的政策机构联邦公开市场委员会如何试图解决这些相互冲突的动态将成为焦点。</blockquote></p><p> “It’s a fine line for them to walk,” says Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial economist at Oxford Economics, as the bond market prices in more tightening amid improving economic data, Covid-19 vaccinations, and building inflation concerns, while the Fed reiterates its dovish stance. “How do you telegraph patience while conveying you won’t be behind the curve?”</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院首席美国金融经济学家凯西·博斯特詹西奇(Kathy Bostjancic)表示：“这对他们来说是一条微妙的界限。”随着经济数据改善、Covid-19疫苗接种和通胀担忧加剧，债券市场价格将进一步收紧，而美联储则重申其鸽派立场。“你如何在传达你不会落后的同时表现出耐心？”</blockquote></p><p> The rate decision and updated materials will be released this Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern time, with Powell’s question-and-answer session following. Here is a run down of what Wall Street is watching.</p><p><blockquote>费率决定和更新材料将于本周三下午2点发布。东部时间，接下来是鲍威尔的问答环节。以下是华尔街正在关注的内容。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Updated economic forecasts:</b>In the December Summary of Economic Projections, the FOMC projected 4.2% GDP growth for 2021 and 3.2% for 2022, bringing its inflation expectation to 2% by the end of 2023 and thus implying rates would begin to rise in 2024.</p><p><blockquote><b>更新的经济预测：</b>在12月份的经济预测摘要中，FOMC预计2021年GDP增长4.2%，2022年增长3.2%，到2023年底通胀预期达到2%，从而意味着利率将在2024年开始上升。</blockquote></p><p> Aneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies, thinks the FOMC will raise GDP forecasts for the next two years to about 6% and 4%, respectively. This should push the unemployment rate below the natural rate (the lowest unemployment rate an economy can sustain with inflation remaining stable) by the second half of 2022, she says, meaning the 2% inflation forecast would be pulled forward to the end of 2022—and the first rate hike therefore pulled forward to 2023. (In December, the Fed projected inflation at a 1.8% rate at the end of this year.)</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)首席经济学家Aneta Markowska认为，FOMC将把未来两年的GDP预期分别上调至6%和4%左右。她表示，到2022年下半年，这将使失业率低于自然失业率（在通胀保持稳定的情况下，一个经济体可以维持的最低失业率），这意味着2%的通胀预测将提前到2022年底——因此首次加息提前到2023年。（去年12月，美联储预计今年年底通胀率为1.8%。）</blockquote></p><p> Fed officials have expressed comfort in letting inflation run hotter than the 2% target. The question is by how much. Even though the FOMC will likely repeat that the recovery will slow after this year, new forecasts may show inflation of over 2% in both 2022 and 2023 alongside an unemployment rate of 3.5% by the end of 2023, thereby meeting the Fed’s criteria of inflation above 2% and “maximum employment,” says David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Funds.</p><p><blockquote>美联储官员对让通胀率高于2%的目标表示欣慰。问题是增加多少。尽管FOMC可能会重申今年之后复苏将放缓，但新的预测可能会显示2022年和2023年的通胀率都将超过2%，到2023年底失业率将达到3.5%，从而满足美联储的标准摩根大通基金首席全球策略师大卫·凯利表示，通胀率高于2%和“最大就业”。</blockquote></p><p> Some economists, however, say the Fed may focus more on a broader unemployment rate, known as the U-6 rate, that includes discouraged workers plus those who are working part time but would prefer to work full time, among others. That would give policy makers more breathing room given how much higher U-6 stands (11.1%) compared with the “official” U-3 rate (6.2%).</p><p><blockquote>然而，一些经济学家表示，美联储可能会更多地关注更广泛的失业率，即U-6失业率，其中包括灰心丧气的工人以及那些从事兼职工作但更愿意全职工作的人等。鉴于U-6比率(11.1%)比“官方”U-3比率(6.2%)高得多，这将给政策制定者更多的喘息空间。</blockquote></p><p> Given the Fed’s new policy framework defines maximum employment as consisting of ‘broad-based and inclusive’ employment, investors looking to handicap the Fed’s next rate move should monitor the U-6 unemployment rate, says Bostjancic of Oxford Economics.</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院的Bostjancic表示，鉴于美联储的新政策框架将最大就业定义为“基础广泛且包容性”的就业，希望阻碍美联储下一次利率变动的投资者应该关注U-6失业率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dot plot:</b>In December, only one of 17 FOMC members submitting forecasts saw a rate hike by the end of 2022 and five saw a rate hike by the end of 2023. While some economists say Fed officials may be wary of lifting their dots, or appearing more hawkish and thereby adding fuel to a surge in long-term interest rates that has been under way, others say the Fed has to show some change in its rate outlook.</p><p><blockquote><b>点阵图：</b>去年12月，在提交预测的17名FOMC成员中，只有一人预计在2022年底前加息，五人预计在2023年底前加息。尽管一些经济学家表示，美联储官员可能会对解除他们的立场持谨慎态度，或者表现得更加鹰派，从而为正在进行的长期利率飙升火上浇油，但其他人表示，美联储必须在利率前景上表现出一些变化。</blockquote></p><p> “Given the magnitude of the likely forecast revisions, it would be hard to justify no change in the policy outlook,” says Markowska. “Not doing so would be inconsistent with data-dependency and would strongly suggest that the Fed is calendar dependent (which the Fed insists it isn’t).” At the same time, she says, the Fed hasn’t pushed back against the recent repricing of rate expectations, which is an implicit endorsement of what’s already priced in.</p><p><blockquote>马科夫斯卡表示：“考虑到可能的预测修正幅度，很难证明政策前景不发生变化是合理的。”“不这样做将与数据依赖性不一致，并强烈表明美联储依赖日历（美联储坚称事实并非如此）。”与此同时，她表示，美联储并没有反对最近对利率预期的重新定价，这是对已经定价的内容的含蓄认可。</blockquote></p><p> Bostjancic expects the median forecast to show at least one 0.25% rate hike during 2023, while Markowska thinks the median 2023 dot could rise to 0.375% (she notes only 4 members need to lift their dots—or signal a higher expected Fed funds rate by the end of 2023—to move the median rate projection. The bond market has priced in three quarter-point increases by the end of 2023.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic预计预测中值将显示2023年至少加息一次0.25%，而Markowska认为2023年dot中值可能升至0.375%（她指出，只有4名成员需要提高dot，或发出更高的预期联邦基金利率到2023年底——以调整利率预测中值。债券市场已消化到2023年底加息三个四分之一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Bond market action:</b>How the Treasury market reacts to the new Fed information will be at least as interesting as the information itself. Instead of the Fed potentially catching up to where the market already is in terms of rate expectations, Bostjancic says even a whiff of the Fed pulling forward rate hike expectations could spur the bond market to price in more tightening.</p><p><blockquote><b>债市动作：</b>国债市场对美联储新信息的反应至少和信息本身一样有趣。博斯特扬西奇表示，美联储可能不会赶上市场在利率预期方面已经达到的水平，而是即使美联储稍微提高加息预期，也可能会刺激债券市场消化更多紧缩政策。</blockquote></p><p> Ian Lyngen, head of rates strategy at BMO Capital, says chances are low Powell will meaningfully alter his stance on the recent yield action, maintaining that as long as the move is driven by an improving economic outlook and inflation expectations, the repricing is for the right reasons. “Needless to say, higher yields are good until they are not and it’s just such an inflection point that represents the more significant policy risk for the Fed,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>BMO Capital利率策略主管伊恩·林根(Ian Lyngen)表示，鲍威尔大幅改变近期收益率走势立场的可能性很低，他坚称，只要此举是由经济前景和通胀预期改善推动的，重新定价就是正确的原因。他表示：“不用说，收益率上升是好事，直到收益率下降，而正是这样一个拐点代表了美联储更重大的政策风险。”</blockquote></p><p> Lyngen is watching the 1.64% level on the 10-year (it was last week’s yield peak as well as the highest for the benchmark since early-February 2020) and has a 1.75% target on the note.</p><p><blockquote>Lyngen正在关注10年期债券1.64%的水平（这是上周的收益率峰值，也是2020年2月初以来基准收益率的最高水平），并将该债券的目标定为1.75%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>SLR exemption extension:</b>Potentially contributing to bond market action on Wednesday will be any signal around the Fed’s plan for a popular program launched last April, as pandemic-driven shutdowns cascaded.</p><p><blockquote><b>SLR豁免延期：</b>随着大流行导致的停工层出不穷，围绕美联储去年4月推出的一项受欢迎计划的任何信号都可能推动周三的债券市场行动。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street is hoping for an extension of a temporary exemption of Treasuries and bank deposits at the Fed Reserve Banks from the banks’ Supplementary Leverage Ratio, which requires financial institutions hold a minimum ratio of at least 3% in capital measured against their total leverage exposure. The exemption is set to expire at the end of March.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街希望延长美联储银行的国债和银行存款对银行补充杠杆率的临时豁免，该规定要求金融机构持有的资本相对于其总杠杆敞口至少为3%的最低比率。该豁免将于三月底到期。</blockquote></p><p> The exemption’s fate has big implications. Over the past year, banks have increased their purchases of Treasuries by a large $854 billion, while bank reserves have ballooned by $1.8 trillion, Bostjancic notes. Economists say the lack of an extension could significantly lessen banks’ appetite for Treasuries, putting even more upward pressure on yields.</p><p><blockquote>豁免的命运有着重大影响。Bostjancic指出，过去一年，银行购买的国债数量大幅增加了8540亿美元，而银行准备金则激增了1.8万亿美元。经济学家表示，缺乏延期可能会大大降低银行对美国国债的兴趣，给收益率带来更大的上行压力。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Further easing watch:</b>Wall Street generally doesn’t expect more easing unless yields stage a more disorderly surge and financial conditions meaningfully tighten. For now, the FOMC “is reasonably well positioned to stay the course for the time being,” Lyngen says, “even if such an outcome involves the risk of tacitly endorsing a further Treasury selloff at stage when investors are wary, if not worried.”</p><p><blockquote><b>进一步宽松观察：</b>华尔街普遍预计不会有更多宽松政策，除非收益率出现更无序的飙升并且金融状况有意义地收紧。林根表示，就目前而言，联邦公开市场委员会“处于相当有利的地位，可以暂时坚持到底”，“即使这样的结果涉及在投资者保持警惕（如果不是担心的话）的阶段默许进一步抛售国债的风险。”</blockquote></p><p> As for potential responses to any disorderly jump in yields, economists say the Fed has a few options. Most immediately, the Fed could opt to lengthen the duration of its current asset purchases, says Bostjancic. As of December, the average maturity under the current program was 7.4 years, she says, adding that policy makers could start buying 10- to 30-year Treasuries. Doing so would effectively be one part of a new “operation twist,” with the other leg involving the sale of short-date Treasury bills, Bostjancic says.</p><p><blockquote>至于对收益率无序跃升的潜在反应，经济学家表示，美联储有几个选择。Bostjancic表示，最直接的是，美联储可能会选择延长当前资产购买的期限。她表示，截至12月，当前计划下的平均期限为7.4年，并补充说政策制定者可以开始购买10至30年期国债。Bostjancic表示，这样做实际上是新“扭曲行动”的一部分，另一部分涉及短期国库券的销售。</blockquote></p><p> If financial conditions tighten much more sharply and buying further out on the yield curve proves insufficient, Bostjancic and others say the Fed could attempt yield curve control.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic和其他人表示，如果金融状况更加急剧收紧，并且在收益率曲线上进一步买入被证明是不够的，美联储可能会尝试控制收益率曲线。</blockquote></p><p> YCC, undertaken by the Fed after World War II, the Bank of Japan in 2016, and the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2020, aims to control interest rates along some portion of the yield curve, targeting longer-term rates directly by imposing interest rate caps on particular maturities.As economists at the St. Louis Fed put it, because bond prices and yields are inversely related, this also implies a price floor for targeted maturities: if bond prices (yields) of targeted maturities remain above (below) the floor, the central bank does nothing. But if prices fall (rise) below (above) the floor, the central bank buys targeted-maturity bonds—increasing the demand and thus the price of those bonds.</p><p><blockquote>YCC由二战后的美联储、2016年的日本央行和2020年的澳大利亚储备银行实施，旨在控制收益率曲线某一部分的利率，通过对特定期限的利率施加利率上限，直接瞄准长期利率。正如圣路易斯联储经济学家所言，由于债券价格和收益率呈负相关，这也意味着目标期限的价格下限：如果目标期限的债券价格（收益率）保持在下限之上（之下），央行什么也不做。但如果价格跌（涨）低于（高于）下限，央行就会购买定向到期债券——增加需求，从而提高这些债券的价格。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Easy Money, the Dot Plot, and the Fed’s Dilemma: An Investor Guide to a Key Meeting<blockquote>宽松货币、点阵图和美联储的困境：重要会议的投资者指南</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEasy Money, the Dot Plot, and the Fed’s Dilemma: An Investor Guide to a Key Meeting<blockquote>宽松货币、点阵图和美联储的困境：重要会议的投资者指南</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-17 10:35</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter economic forecasts while trying to assure investors that it is still “not thinking about thinking about” lifting interest rates—and that it doesn’t need to.</p><p><blockquote>美联储本周面临着一个尴尬的平衡行为：它可能会立即发布更光明的经济预测，同时试图向投资者保证它仍然“不考虑考虑”加息——而且也不需要加息。</blockquote></p><p> More-optimistic estimates for gross domestic product, unemployment and inflation would typically prompt an acknowledgement that monetary policy would, in turn, begin to tighten. For a data-dependent Fed, the message that the economy is improving much faster than expected is at odds with the message that rates will remain near zero through 2023. How the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy arm, tries to square those conflicting dynamics will be in focus as investors take in new economic forecasts, the dot plot showing updated rate predictions, and Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference.</p><p><blockquote>对国内生产总值、失业率和通胀的更乐观估计通常会促使人们承认货币政策将反过来开始收紧。对于依赖数据的美联储来说，经济改善速度远快于预期的信息与利率将在2023年之前保持在接近零的信息不一致。随着投资者接受新的经济预测、显示最新利率预测的点阵图以及主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的新闻发布会，美联储的政策机构联邦公开市场委员会如何试图解决这些相互冲突的动态将成为焦点。</blockquote></p><p> “It’s a fine line for them to walk,” says Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial economist at Oxford Economics, as the bond market prices in more tightening amid improving economic data, Covid-19 vaccinations, and building inflation concerns, while the Fed reiterates its dovish stance. “How do you telegraph patience while conveying you won’t be behind the curve?”</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院首席美国金融经济学家凯西·博斯特詹西奇(Kathy Bostjancic)表示：“这对他们来说是一条微妙的界限。”随着经济数据改善、Covid-19疫苗接种和通胀担忧加剧，债券市场价格将进一步收紧，而美联储则重申其鸽派立场。“你如何在传达你不会落后的同时表现出耐心？”</blockquote></p><p> The rate decision and updated materials will be released this Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern time, with Powell’s question-and-answer session following. Here is a run down of what Wall Street is watching.</p><p><blockquote>费率决定和更新材料将于本周三下午2点发布。东部时间，接下来是鲍威尔的问答环节。以下是华尔街正在关注的内容。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Updated economic forecasts:</b>In the December Summary of Economic Projections, the FOMC projected 4.2% GDP growth for 2021 and 3.2% for 2022, bringing its inflation expectation to 2% by the end of 2023 and thus implying rates would begin to rise in 2024.</p><p><blockquote><b>更新的经济预测：</b>在12月份的经济预测摘要中，FOMC预计2021年GDP增长4.2%，2022年增长3.2%，到2023年底通胀预期达到2%，从而意味着利率将在2024年开始上升。</blockquote></p><p> Aneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies, thinks the FOMC will raise GDP forecasts for the next two years to about 6% and 4%, respectively. This should push the unemployment rate below the natural rate (the lowest unemployment rate an economy can sustain with inflation remaining stable) by the second half of 2022, she says, meaning the 2% inflation forecast would be pulled forward to the end of 2022—and the first rate hike therefore pulled forward to 2023. (In December, the Fed projected inflation at a 1.8% rate at the end of this year.)</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)首席经济学家Aneta Markowska认为，FOMC将把未来两年的GDP预期分别上调至6%和4%左右。她表示，到2022年下半年，这将使失业率低于自然失业率（在通胀保持稳定的情况下，一个经济体可以维持的最低失业率），这意味着2%的通胀预测将提前到2022年底——因此首次加息提前到2023年。（去年12月，美联储预计今年年底通胀率为1.8%。）</blockquote></p><p> Fed officials have expressed comfort in letting inflation run hotter than the 2% target. The question is by how much. Even though the FOMC will likely repeat that the recovery will slow after this year, new forecasts may show inflation of over 2% in both 2022 and 2023 alongside an unemployment rate of 3.5% by the end of 2023, thereby meeting the Fed’s criteria of inflation above 2% and “maximum employment,” says David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Funds.</p><p><blockquote>美联储官员对让通胀率高于2%的目标表示欣慰。问题是增加多少。尽管FOMC可能会重申今年之后复苏将放缓，但新的预测可能会显示2022年和2023年的通胀率都将超过2%，到2023年底失业率将达到3.5%，从而满足美联储的标准摩根大通基金首席全球策略师大卫·凯利表示，通胀率高于2%和“最大就业”。</blockquote></p><p> Some economists, however, say the Fed may focus more on a broader unemployment rate, known as the U-6 rate, that includes discouraged workers plus those who are working part time but would prefer to work full time, among others. That would give policy makers more breathing room given how much higher U-6 stands (11.1%) compared with the “official” U-3 rate (6.2%).</p><p><blockquote>然而，一些经济学家表示，美联储可能会更多地关注更广泛的失业率，即U-6失业率，其中包括灰心丧气的工人以及那些从事兼职工作但更愿意全职工作的人等。鉴于U-6比率(11.1%)比“官方”U-3比率(6.2%)高得多，这将给政策制定者更多的喘息空间。</blockquote></p><p> Given the Fed’s new policy framework defines maximum employment as consisting of ‘broad-based and inclusive’ employment, investors looking to handicap the Fed’s next rate move should monitor the U-6 unemployment rate, says Bostjancic of Oxford Economics.</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院的Bostjancic表示，鉴于美联储的新政策框架将最大就业定义为“基础广泛且包容性”的就业，希望阻碍美联储下一次利率变动的投资者应该关注U-6失业率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dot plot:</b>In December, only one of 17 FOMC members submitting forecasts saw a rate hike by the end of 2022 and five saw a rate hike by the end of 2023. While some economists say Fed officials may be wary of lifting their dots, or appearing more hawkish and thereby adding fuel to a surge in long-term interest rates that has been under way, others say the Fed has to show some change in its rate outlook.</p><p><blockquote><b>点阵图：</b>去年12月，在提交预测的17名FOMC成员中，只有一人预计在2022年底前加息，五人预计在2023年底前加息。尽管一些经济学家表示，美联储官员可能会对解除他们的立场持谨慎态度，或者表现得更加鹰派，从而为正在进行的长期利率飙升火上浇油，但其他人表示，美联储必须在利率前景上表现出一些变化。</blockquote></p><p> “Given the magnitude of the likely forecast revisions, it would be hard to justify no change in the policy outlook,” says Markowska. “Not doing so would be inconsistent with data-dependency and would strongly suggest that the Fed is calendar dependent (which the Fed insists it isn’t).” At the same time, she says, the Fed hasn’t pushed back against the recent repricing of rate expectations, which is an implicit endorsement of what’s already priced in.</p><p><blockquote>马科夫斯卡表示：“考虑到可能的预测修正幅度，很难证明政策前景不发生变化是合理的。”“不这样做将与数据依赖性不一致，并强烈表明美联储依赖日历（美联储坚称事实并非如此）。”与此同时，她表示，美联储并没有反对最近对利率预期的重新定价，这是对已经定价的内容的含蓄认可。</blockquote></p><p> Bostjancic expects the median forecast to show at least one 0.25% rate hike during 2023, while Markowska thinks the median 2023 dot could rise to 0.375% (she notes only 4 members need to lift their dots—or signal a higher expected Fed funds rate by the end of 2023—to move the median rate projection. The bond market has priced in three quarter-point increases by the end of 2023.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic预计预测中值将显示2023年至少加息一次0.25%，而Markowska认为2023年dot中值可能升至0.375%（她指出，只有4名成员需要提高dot，或发出更高的预期联邦基金利率到2023年底——以调整利率预测中值。债券市场已消化到2023年底加息三个四分之一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Bond market action:</b>How the Treasury market reacts to the new Fed information will be at least as interesting as the information itself. Instead of the Fed potentially catching up to where the market already is in terms of rate expectations, Bostjancic says even a whiff of the Fed pulling forward rate hike expectations could spur the bond market to price in more tightening.</p><p><blockquote><b>债市动作：</b>国债市场对美联储新信息的反应至少和信息本身一样有趣。博斯特扬西奇表示，美联储可能不会赶上市场在利率预期方面已经达到的水平，而是即使美联储稍微提高加息预期，也可能会刺激债券市场消化更多紧缩政策。</blockquote></p><p> Ian Lyngen, head of rates strategy at BMO Capital, says chances are low Powell will meaningfully alter his stance on the recent yield action, maintaining that as long as the move is driven by an improving economic outlook and inflation expectations, the repricing is for the right reasons. “Needless to say, higher yields are good until they are not and it’s just such an inflection point that represents the more significant policy risk for the Fed,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>BMO Capital利率策略主管伊恩·林根(Ian Lyngen)表示，鲍威尔大幅改变近期收益率走势立场的可能性很低，他坚称，只要此举是由经济前景和通胀预期改善推动的，重新定价就是正确的原因。他表示：“不用说，收益率上升是好事，直到收益率下降，而正是这样一个拐点代表了美联储更重大的政策风险。”</blockquote></p><p> Lyngen is watching the 1.64% level on the 10-year (it was last week’s yield peak as well as the highest for the benchmark since early-February 2020) and has a 1.75% target on the note.</p><p><blockquote>Lyngen正在关注10年期债券1.64%的水平（这是上周的收益率峰值，也是2020年2月初以来基准收益率的最高水平），并将该债券的目标定为1.75%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>SLR exemption extension:</b>Potentially contributing to bond market action on Wednesday will be any signal around the Fed’s plan for a popular program launched last April, as pandemic-driven shutdowns cascaded.</p><p><blockquote><b>SLR豁免延期：</b>随着大流行导致的停工层出不穷，围绕美联储去年4月推出的一项受欢迎计划的任何信号都可能推动周三的债券市场行动。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street is hoping for an extension of a temporary exemption of Treasuries and bank deposits at the Fed Reserve Banks from the banks’ Supplementary Leverage Ratio, which requires financial institutions hold a minimum ratio of at least 3% in capital measured against their total leverage exposure. The exemption is set to expire at the end of March.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街希望延长美联储银行的国债和银行存款对银行补充杠杆率的临时豁免，该规定要求金融机构持有的资本相对于其总杠杆敞口至少为3%的最低比率。该豁免将于三月底到期。</blockquote></p><p> The exemption’s fate has big implications. Over the past year, banks have increased their purchases of Treasuries by a large $854 billion, while bank reserves have ballooned by $1.8 trillion, Bostjancic notes. Economists say the lack of an extension could significantly lessen banks’ appetite for Treasuries, putting even more upward pressure on yields.</p><p><blockquote>豁免的命运有着重大影响。Bostjancic指出，过去一年，银行购买的国债数量大幅增加了8540亿美元，而银行准备金则激增了1.8万亿美元。经济学家表示，缺乏延期可能会大大降低银行对美国国债的兴趣，给收益率带来更大的上行压力。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Further easing watch:</b>Wall Street generally doesn’t expect more easing unless yields stage a more disorderly surge and financial conditions meaningfully tighten. For now, the FOMC “is reasonably well positioned to stay the course for the time being,” Lyngen says, “even if such an outcome involves the risk of tacitly endorsing a further Treasury selloff at stage when investors are wary, if not worried.”</p><p><blockquote><b>进一步宽松观察：</b>华尔街普遍预计不会有更多宽松政策，除非收益率出现更无序的飙升并且金融状况有意义地收紧。林根表示，就目前而言，联邦公开市场委员会“处于相当有利的地位，可以暂时坚持到底”，“即使这样的结果涉及在投资者保持警惕（如果不是担心的话）的阶段默许进一步抛售国债的风险。”</blockquote></p><p> As for potential responses to any disorderly jump in yields, economists say the Fed has a few options. Most immediately, the Fed could opt to lengthen the duration of its current asset purchases, says Bostjancic. As of December, the average maturity under the current program was 7.4 years, she says, adding that policy makers could start buying 10- to 30-year Treasuries. Doing so would effectively be one part of a new “operation twist,” with the other leg involving the sale of short-date Treasury bills, Bostjancic says.</p><p><blockquote>至于对收益率无序跃升的潜在反应，经济学家表示，美联储有几个选择。Bostjancic表示，最直接的是，美联储可能会选择延长当前资产购买的期限。她表示，截至12月，当前计划下的平均期限为7.4年，并补充说政策制定者可以开始购买10至30年期国债。Bostjancic表示，这样做实际上是新“扭曲行动”的一部分，另一部分涉及短期国库券的销售。</blockquote></p><p> If financial conditions tighten much more sharply and buying further out on the yield curve proves insufficient, Bostjancic and others say the Fed could attempt yield curve control.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic和其他人表示，如果金融状况更加急剧收紧，并且在收益率曲线上进一步买入被证明是不够的，美联储可能会尝试控制收益率曲线。</blockquote></p><p> YCC, undertaken by the Fed after World War II, the Bank of Japan in 2016, and the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2020, aims to control interest rates along some portion of the yield curve, targeting longer-term rates directly by imposing interest rate caps on particular maturities.As economists at the St. Louis Fed put it, because bond prices and yields are inversely related, this also implies a price floor for targeted maturities: if bond prices (yields) of targeted maturities remain above (below) the floor, the central bank does nothing. But if prices fall (rise) below (above) the floor, the central bank buys targeted-maturity bonds—increasing the demand and thus the price of those bonds.</p><p><blockquote>YCC由二战后的美联储、2016年的日本央行和2020年的澳大利亚储备银行实施，旨在控制收益率曲线某一部分的利率，通过对特定期限的利率施加利率上限，直接瞄准长期利率。正如圣路易斯联储经济学家所言，由于债券价格和收益率呈负相关，这也意味着目标期限的价格下限：如果目标期限的债券价格（收益率）保持在下限之上（之下），央行什么也不做。但如果价格跌（涨）低于（高于）下限，央行就会购买定向到期债券——增加需求，从而提高这些债券的价格。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/easy-money-the-dot-plot-and-the-feds-dilemma-an-investor-guide-to-a-key-meeting-51615905001?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/easy-money-the-dot-plot-and-the-feds-dilemma-an-investor-guide-to-a-key-meeting-51615905001?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103121082","content_text":"The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter economic forecasts while trying to assure investors that it is still “not thinking about thinking about” lifting interest rates—and that it doesn’t need to.\nMore-optimistic estimates for gross domestic product, unemployment and inflation would typically prompt an acknowledgement that monetary policy would, in turn, begin to tighten. For a data-dependent Fed, the message that the economy is improving much faster than expected is at odds with the message that rates will remain near zero through 2023. How the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy arm, tries to square those conflicting dynamics will be in focus as investors take in new economic forecasts, the dot plot showing updated rate predictions, and Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference.\n“It’s a fine line for them to walk,” says Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial economist at Oxford Economics, as the bond market prices in more tightening amid improving economic data, Covid-19 vaccinations, and building inflation concerns, while the Fed reiterates its dovish stance. “How do you telegraph patience while conveying you won’t be behind the curve?”\nThe rate decision and updated materials will be released this Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern time, with Powell’s question-and-answer session following. Here is a run down of what Wall Street is watching.\nUpdated economic forecasts:In the December Summary of Economic Projections, the FOMC projected 4.2% GDP growth for 2021 and 3.2% for 2022, bringing its inflation expectation to 2% by the end of 2023 and thus implying rates would begin to rise in 2024.\nAneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies, thinks the FOMC will raise GDP forecasts for the next two years to about 6% and 4%, respectively. This should push the unemployment rate below the natural rate (the lowest unemployment rate an economy can sustain with inflation remaining stable) by the second half of 2022, she says, meaning the 2% inflation forecast would be pulled forward to the end of 2022—and the first rate hike therefore pulled forward to 2023. (In December, the Fed projected inflation at a 1.8% rate at the end of this year.)\nFed officials have expressed comfort in letting inflation run hotter than the 2% target. The question is by how much. Even though the FOMC will likely repeat that the recovery will slow after this year, new forecasts may show inflation of over 2% in both 2022 and 2023 alongside an unemployment rate of 3.5% by the end of 2023, thereby meeting the Fed’s criteria of inflation above 2% and “maximum employment,” says David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Funds.\nSome economists, however, say the Fed may focus more on a broader unemployment rate, known as the U-6 rate, that includes discouraged workers plus those who are working part time but would prefer to work full time, among others. That would give policy makers more breathing room given how much higher U-6 stands (11.1%) compared with the “official” U-3 rate (6.2%).\nGiven the Fed’s new policy framework defines maximum employment as consisting of ‘broad-based and inclusive’ employment, investors looking to handicap the Fed’s next rate move should monitor the U-6 unemployment rate, says Bostjancic of Oxford Economics.\nThe dot plot:In December, only one of 17 FOMC members submitting forecasts saw a rate hike by the end of 2022 and five saw a rate hike by the end of 2023. While some economists say Fed officials may be wary of lifting their dots, or appearing more hawkish and thereby adding fuel to a surge in long-term interest rates that has been under way, others say the Fed has to show some change in its rate outlook.\n“Given the magnitude of the likely forecast revisions, it would be hard to justify no change in the policy outlook,” says Markowska. “Not doing so would be inconsistent with data-dependency and would strongly suggest that the Fed is calendar dependent (which the Fed insists it isn’t).” At the same time, she says, the Fed hasn’t pushed back against the recent repricing of rate expectations, which is an implicit endorsement of what’s already priced in.\nBostjancic expects the median forecast to show at least one 0.25% rate hike during 2023, while Markowska thinks the median 2023 dot could rise to 0.375% (she notes only 4 members need to lift their dots—or signal a higher expected Fed funds rate by the end of 2023—to move the median rate projection. The bond market has priced in three quarter-point increases by the end of 2023.\nBond market action:How the Treasury market reacts to the new Fed information will be at least as interesting as the information itself. Instead of the Fed potentially catching up to where the market already is in terms of rate expectations, Bostjancic says even a whiff of the Fed pulling forward rate hike expectations could spur the bond market to price in more tightening.\nIan Lyngen, head of rates strategy at BMO Capital, says chances are low Powell will meaningfully alter his stance on the recent yield action, maintaining that as long as the move is driven by an improving economic outlook and inflation expectations, the repricing is for the right reasons. “Needless to say, higher yields are good until they are not and it’s just such an inflection point that represents the more significant policy risk for the Fed,” he says.\nLyngen is watching the 1.64% level on the 10-year (it was last week’s yield peak as well as the highest for the benchmark since early-February 2020) and has a 1.75% target on the note.\nSLR exemption extension:Potentially contributing to bond market action on Wednesday will be any signal around the Fed’s plan for a popular program launched last April, as pandemic-driven shutdowns cascaded.\nWall Street is hoping for an extension of a temporary exemption of Treasuries and bank deposits at the Fed Reserve Banks from the banks’ Supplementary Leverage Ratio, which requires financial institutions hold a minimum ratio of at least 3% in capital measured against their total leverage exposure. The exemption is set to expire at the end of March.\nThe exemption’s fate has big implications. Over the past year, banks have increased their purchases of Treasuries by a large $854 billion, while bank reserves have ballooned by $1.8 trillion, Bostjancic notes. Economists say the lack of an extension could significantly lessen banks’ appetite for Treasuries, putting even more upward pressure on yields.\nFurther easing watch:Wall Street generally doesn’t expect more easing unless yields stage a more disorderly surge and financial conditions meaningfully tighten. For now, the FOMC “is reasonably well positioned to stay the course for the time being,” Lyngen says, “even if such an outcome involves the risk of tacitly endorsing a further Treasury selloff at stage when investors are wary, if not worried.”\nAs for potential responses to any disorderly jump in yields, economists say the Fed has a few options. Most immediately, the Fed could opt to lengthen the duration of its current asset purchases, says Bostjancic. As of December, the average maturity under the current program was 7.4 years, she says, adding that policy makers could start buying 10- to 30-year Treasuries. Doing so would effectively be one part of a new “operation twist,” with the other leg involving the sale of short-date Treasury bills, Bostjancic says.\nIf financial conditions tighten much more sharply and buying further out on the yield curve proves insufficient, Bostjancic and others say the Fed could attempt yield curve control.\nYCC, undertaken by the Fed after World War II, the Bank of Japan in 2016, and the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2020, aims to control interest rates along some portion of the yield curve, targeting longer-term rates directly by imposing interest rate caps on particular maturities.As economists at the St. Louis Fed put it, because bond prices and yields are inversely related, this also implies a price floor for targeted maturities: if bond prices (yields) of targeted maturities remain above (below) the floor, the central bank does nothing. But if prices fall (rise) below (above) the floor, the central bank buys targeted-maturity bonds—increasing the demand and thus the price of those bonds.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1470,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328633897,"gmtCreate":1615518317119,"gmtModify":1703490327233,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Too much money, will only flow into stocks. :)","listText":"Too much money, will only flow into stocks. :)","text":"Too much money, will only flow into stocks. :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328633897","repostId":"1134483939","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329575665,"gmtCreate":1615263978957,"gmtModify":1703486451394,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Correction is good and healthy.&nbsp;","listText":"Correction is good and healthy.&nbsp;","text":"Correction is good and healthy.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329575665","repostId":"1177211195","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177211195","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615213425,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1177211195?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-08 22:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Top tech stocks are in correction territory. Here's why<blockquote>顶级科技股正处于调整区域。原因如下</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177211195","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Apple (AAPL) shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's","content":"<p><b>London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Apple&nbsp;(AAPL)&nbsp;shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's stock is off 11% from a recent peak in early February. And chipmaker&nbsp;Nvidia&nbsp;(NVDA)&nbsp;has seen its shares plunge nearly 19% since the middle of last month.</p><p><blockquote><b>伦敦（CNN商业）——</b>苹果(AAPL)股价较1月份高点下跌超过15%。亚马逊股价较2月初的近期峰值下跌11%。芯片制造商英伟达(NVDA)的股价自上个月中旬以来已暴跌近19%。</blockquote></p><p>What's happening: Tech companies are getting hammered by the recent&nbsp;sell-off in markets. Many stocks in the sector have entered a correction, logging declines of at least 10% from their recent peaks.</p><p><blockquote>正在发生的事情：科技公司受到最近市场抛售的打击。该行业的许多股票已进入回调，较近期峰值下跌至少10%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite may not be far behind. The index finished Friday more than 8% below the record high notched on Feb. 12. Futures point to another rough trading session on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数可能也不甘落后。该指数周五收盘较2月12日创下的历史新高低8%以上。期货指向周一另一个艰难的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc50317ec0fe580acd1407307915d8fa\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"651\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Breaking it down: Investors have become increasingly worried that the reopening of many big economies later this year will lead to a spike in prices as people rush out to restaurants and book vacations. That could put pressure on central banks like the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p><blockquote>分解一下：投资者越来越担心，随着人们涌向餐馆和预订假期，今年晚些时候许多大型经济体的重新开放将导致价格飙升。这可能会给美联储等央行带来压力，要求其比预期更早加息。</blockquote></p><p>Rock-bottom rates have been a boon for fast-growing tech companies. They've helped keep yields on government bonds extremely low, boosting interest in riskier investments like stocks that offer better returns.</p><p><blockquote>最低利率对快速增长的科技公司来说是一个福音。它们帮助将政府债券的收益率保持在极低的水平，提高了人们对风险较高的投资的兴趣，例如提供更好回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p>But now, bond yields are rising on&nbsp;inflation concerns. That could make assets like US Treasuries start to appear more enticing — triggering outflows from the tech names that have been so popular over the past 11 months.</p><p><blockquote>但现在，由于通胀担忧，债券收益率正在上升。这可能会让美国国债等资产开始显得更具吸引力，引发过去11个月如此受欢迎的科技股资金外流。</blockquote></p><p>Jeroen Blokland, a portfolio manager at Robeco, thinks that as estimates for economic growth continue to improve, so-called \"value\" stocks in sectors like banking — which benefit from a healthy economy — may begin to get a second look.</p><p><blockquote>荷宝(Robeco)投资组合经理耶鲁安·布洛克兰(Jeroen Blokland)认为，随着对经济增长的预期不断改善，受益于健康经济的银行业等行业的所谓“价值”股票可能会开始受到重新审视。</blockquote></p><p>\"If you believe in this whole reopening and estimates of GDP growth ... that means growth is less scarce,\" he told me. \"[Then the] value sector has at least the possibility to play catch up.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果你相信整个重新开放和对GDP增长的估计……这意味着增长不那么稀缺，”他告诉我。“[那么]价值板块至少有可能迎头赶上。”</blockquote></p><p>See here: The KBW Bank Index, which tracks top US lenders, is up more than 20% this year. The Nasdaq, meanwhile, has almost wiped out all of its 2021 gains.</p><p><blockquote>请参阅此处：追踪美国顶级银行的KBW银行指数今年上涨了20%以上。与此同时，纳斯达克几乎抹去了2021年的所有涨幅。</blockquote></p><p>Many strategists think the declines are healthy, and that share prices of many tech companies shot up too much, too fast.</p><p><blockquote>许多策略师认为下跌是健康的，许多科技公司的股价上涨太多、太快。</blockquote></p><p>Continued selling may hinge on what we hear from central bankers in the coming days. The European Central Bank, which meets later this week, has stated clearly that it will take some action if it believes the rapid increase in bond yields will lead to tighter financial conditions. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been less explicit.</p><p><blockquote>持续抛售可能取决于我们在未来几天从央行行长那里听到的消息。本周晚些时候召开会议的欧洲央行已经明确表示，如果认为债券收益率快速上升将导致金融状况收紧，将采取一些行动。美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔没有那么明确。</blockquote></p><p>Blokland thinks that if the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note marches significantly higher this week, Powell may have no choice but to strongly assert that the Fed will act as necessary to ensure the economic recovery isn't affected by market turmoil.</p><p><blockquote>布洛克兰认为，如果本周10年期美国国债收益率大幅走高，鲍威尔可能别无选择，只能强烈断言美联储将采取必要行动，确保经济复苏不受市场动荡的影响。</blockquote></p><p>\"If we have another week like last week, [he has] to do something,\" Blokland said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果我们再有像上周那样的一周，[他]就必须做点什么，”布洛克兰说。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Top tech stocks are in correction territory. Here's why<blockquote>顶级科技股正处于调整区域。原因如下</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTop tech stocks are in correction territory. Here's why<blockquote>顶级科技股正处于调整区域。原因如下</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN Business</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-08 22:23</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Apple&nbsp;(AAPL)&nbsp;shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's stock is off 11% from a recent peak in early February. And chipmaker&nbsp;Nvidia&nbsp;(NVDA)&nbsp;has seen its shares plunge nearly 19% since the middle of last month.</p><p><blockquote><b>伦敦（CNN商业）——</b>苹果(AAPL)股价较1月份高点下跌超过15%。亚马逊股价较2月初的近期峰值下跌11%。芯片制造商英伟达(NVDA)的股价自上个月中旬以来已暴跌近19%。</blockquote></p><p>What's happening: Tech companies are getting hammered by the recent&nbsp;sell-off in markets. Many stocks in the sector have entered a correction, logging declines of at least 10% from their recent peaks.</p><p><blockquote>正在发生的事情：科技公司受到最近市场抛售的打击。该行业的许多股票已进入回调，较近期峰值下跌至少10%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite may not be far behind. The index finished Friday more than 8% below the record high notched on Feb. 12. Futures point to another rough trading session on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数可能也不甘落后。该指数周五收盘较2月12日创下的历史新高低8%以上。期货指向周一另一个艰难的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc50317ec0fe580acd1407307915d8fa\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"651\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Breaking it down: Investors have become increasingly worried that the reopening of many big economies later this year will lead to a spike in prices as people rush out to restaurants and book vacations. That could put pressure on central banks like the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p><blockquote>分解一下：投资者越来越担心，随着人们涌向餐馆和预订假期，今年晚些时候许多大型经济体的重新开放将导致价格飙升。这可能会给美联储等央行带来压力，要求其比预期更早加息。</blockquote></p><p>Rock-bottom rates have been a boon for fast-growing tech companies. They've helped keep yields on government bonds extremely low, boosting interest in riskier investments like stocks that offer better returns.</p><p><blockquote>最低利率对快速增长的科技公司来说是一个福音。它们帮助将政府债券的收益率保持在极低的水平，提高了人们对风险较高的投资的兴趣，例如提供更好回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p>But now, bond yields are rising on&nbsp;inflation concerns. That could make assets like US Treasuries start to appear more enticing — triggering outflows from the tech names that have been so popular over the past 11 months.</p><p><blockquote>但现在，由于通胀担忧，债券收益率正在上升。这可能会让美国国债等资产开始显得更具吸引力，引发过去11个月如此受欢迎的科技股资金外流。</blockquote></p><p>Jeroen Blokland, a portfolio manager at Robeco, thinks that as estimates for economic growth continue to improve, so-called \"value\" stocks in sectors like banking — which benefit from a healthy economy — may begin to get a second look.</p><p><blockquote>荷宝(Robeco)投资组合经理耶鲁安·布洛克兰(Jeroen Blokland)认为，随着对经济增长的预期不断改善，受益于健康经济的银行业等行业的所谓“价值”股票可能会开始受到重新审视。</blockquote></p><p>\"If you believe in this whole reopening and estimates of GDP growth ... that means growth is less scarce,\" he told me. \"[Then the] value sector has at least the possibility to play catch up.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果你相信整个重新开放和对GDP增长的估计……这意味着增长不那么稀缺，”他告诉我。“[那么]价值板块至少有可能迎头赶上。”</blockquote></p><p>See here: The KBW Bank Index, which tracks top US lenders, is up more than 20% this year. The Nasdaq, meanwhile, has almost wiped out all of its 2021 gains.</p><p><blockquote>请参阅此处：追踪美国顶级银行的KBW银行指数今年上涨了20%以上。与此同时，纳斯达克几乎抹去了2021年的所有涨幅。</blockquote></p><p>Many strategists think the declines are healthy, and that share prices of many tech companies shot up too much, too fast.</p><p><blockquote>许多策略师认为下跌是健康的，许多科技公司的股价上涨太多、太快。</blockquote></p><p>Continued selling may hinge on what we hear from central bankers in the coming days. The European Central Bank, which meets later this week, has stated clearly that it will take some action if it believes the rapid increase in bond yields will lead to tighter financial conditions. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been less explicit.</p><p><blockquote>持续抛售可能取决于我们在未来几天从央行行长那里听到的消息。本周晚些时候召开会议的欧洲央行已经明确表示，如果认为债券收益率快速上升将导致金融状况收紧，将采取一些行动。美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔没有那么明确。</blockquote></p><p>Blokland thinks that if the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note marches significantly higher this week, Powell may have no choice but to strongly assert that the Fed will act as necessary to ensure the economic recovery isn't affected by market turmoil.</p><p><blockquote>布洛克兰认为，如果本周10年期美国国债收益率大幅走高，鲍威尔可能别无选择，只能强烈断言美联储将采取必要行动，确保经济复苏不受市场动荡的影响。</blockquote></p><p>\"If we have another week like last week, [he has] to do something,\" Blokland said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果我们再有像上周那样的一周，[他]就必须做点什么，”布洛克兰说。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/08/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A","MSFT":"微软","NFLX":"奈飞","AMZN":"亚马逊","FB":"ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF","AAPL":"苹果","NVDA":"英伟达",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/08/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177211195","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Apple (AAPL) shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's stock is off 11% from a recent peak in early February. And chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA) has seen its shares plunge nearly 19% since the middle of last month.What's happening: Tech companies are getting hammered by the recent sell-off in markets. Many stocks in the sector have entered a correction, logging declines of at least 10% from their recent peaks.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite may not be far behind. The index finished Friday more than 8% below the record high notched on Feb. 12. Futures point to another rough trading session on Monday.Breaking it down: Investors have become increasingly worried that the reopening of many big economies later this year will lead to a spike in prices as people rush out to restaurants and book vacations. That could put pressure on central banks like the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates sooner than expected.Rock-bottom rates have been a boon for fast-growing tech companies. They've helped keep yields on government bonds extremely low, boosting interest in riskier investments like stocks that offer better returns.But now, bond yields are rising on inflation concerns. That could make assets like US Treasuries start to appear more enticing — triggering outflows from the tech names that have been so popular over the past 11 months.Jeroen Blokland, a portfolio manager at Robeco, thinks that as estimates for economic growth continue to improve, so-called \"value\" stocks in sectors like banking — which benefit from a healthy economy — may begin to get a second look.\"If you believe in this whole reopening and estimates of GDP growth ... that means growth is less scarce,\" he told me. \"[Then the] value sector has at least the possibility to play catch up.\"See here: The KBW Bank Index, which tracks top US lenders, is up more than 20% this year. The Nasdaq, meanwhile, has almost wiped out all of its 2021 gains.Many strategists think the declines are healthy, and that share prices of many tech companies shot up too much, too fast.Continued selling may hinge on what we hear from central bankers in the coming days. The European Central Bank, which meets later this week, has stated clearly that it will take some action if it believes the rapid increase in bond yields will lead to tighter financial conditions. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been less explicit.Blokland thinks that if the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note marches significantly higher this week, Powell may have no choice but to strongly assert that the Fed will act as necessary to ensure the economic recovery isn't affected by market turmoil.\"If we have another week like last week, [he has] to do something,\" Blokland said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"FB":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"NFLX":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"NVDA":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1502,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":328633897,"gmtCreate":1615518317119,"gmtModify":1703490327233,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Too much money, will only flow into stocks. :)","listText":"Too much money, will only flow into stocks. :)","text":"Too much money, will only flow into stocks. :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328633897","repostId":"1134483939","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329575665,"gmtCreate":1615263978957,"gmtModify":1703486451394,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Correction is good and healthy.&nbsp;","listText":"Correction is good and healthy.&nbsp;","text":"Correction is good and healthy.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329575665","repostId":"1177211195","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177211195","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615213425,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1177211195?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-08 22:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Top tech stocks are in correction territory. Here's why<blockquote>顶级科技股正处于调整区域。原因如下</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177211195","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Apple (AAPL) shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's","content":"<p><b>London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Apple&nbsp;(AAPL)&nbsp;shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's stock is off 11% from a recent peak in early February. And chipmaker&nbsp;Nvidia&nbsp;(NVDA)&nbsp;has seen its shares plunge nearly 19% since the middle of last month.</p><p><blockquote><b>伦敦（CNN商业）——</b>苹果(AAPL)股价较1月份高点下跌超过15%。亚马逊股价较2月初的近期峰值下跌11%。芯片制造商英伟达(NVDA)的股价自上个月中旬以来已暴跌近19%。</blockquote></p><p>What's happening: Tech companies are getting hammered by the recent&nbsp;sell-off in markets. Many stocks in the sector have entered a correction, logging declines of at least 10% from their recent peaks.</p><p><blockquote>正在发生的事情：科技公司受到最近市场抛售的打击。该行业的许多股票已进入回调，较近期峰值下跌至少10%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite may not be far behind. The index finished Friday more than 8% below the record high notched on Feb. 12. Futures point to another rough trading session on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数可能也不甘落后。该指数周五收盘较2月12日创下的历史新高低8%以上。期货指向周一另一个艰难的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc50317ec0fe580acd1407307915d8fa\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"651\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Breaking it down: Investors have become increasingly worried that the reopening of many big economies later this year will lead to a spike in prices as people rush out to restaurants and book vacations. That could put pressure on central banks like the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p><blockquote>分解一下：投资者越来越担心，随着人们涌向餐馆和预订假期，今年晚些时候许多大型经济体的重新开放将导致价格飙升。这可能会给美联储等央行带来压力，要求其比预期更早加息。</blockquote></p><p>Rock-bottom rates have been a boon for fast-growing tech companies. They've helped keep yields on government bonds extremely low, boosting interest in riskier investments like stocks that offer better returns.</p><p><blockquote>最低利率对快速增长的科技公司来说是一个福音。它们帮助将政府债券的收益率保持在极低的水平，提高了人们对风险较高的投资的兴趣，例如提供更好回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p>But now, bond yields are rising on&nbsp;inflation concerns. That could make assets like US Treasuries start to appear more enticing — triggering outflows from the tech names that have been so popular over the past 11 months.</p><p><blockquote>但现在，由于通胀担忧，债券收益率正在上升。这可能会让美国国债等资产开始显得更具吸引力，引发过去11个月如此受欢迎的科技股资金外流。</blockquote></p><p>Jeroen Blokland, a portfolio manager at Robeco, thinks that as estimates for economic growth continue to improve, so-called \"value\" stocks in sectors like banking — which benefit from a healthy economy — may begin to get a second look.</p><p><blockquote>荷宝(Robeco)投资组合经理耶鲁安·布洛克兰(Jeroen Blokland)认为，随着对经济增长的预期不断改善，受益于健康经济的银行业等行业的所谓“价值”股票可能会开始受到重新审视。</blockquote></p><p>\"If you believe in this whole reopening and estimates of GDP growth ... that means growth is less scarce,\" he told me. \"[Then the] value sector has at least the possibility to play catch up.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果你相信整个重新开放和对GDP增长的估计……这意味着增长不那么稀缺，”他告诉我。“[那么]价值板块至少有可能迎头赶上。”</blockquote></p><p>See here: The KBW Bank Index, which tracks top US lenders, is up more than 20% this year. The Nasdaq, meanwhile, has almost wiped out all of its 2021 gains.</p><p><blockquote>请参阅此处：追踪美国顶级银行的KBW银行指数今年上涨了20%以上。与此同时，纳斯达克几乎抹去了2021年的所有涨幅。</blockquote></p><p>Many strategists think the declines are healthy, and that share prices of many tech companies shot up too much, too fast.</p><p><blockquote>许多策略师认为下跌是健康的，许多科技公司的股价上涨太多、太快。</blockquote></p><p>Continued selling may hinge on what we hear from central bankers in the coming days. The European Central Bank, which meets later this week, has stated clearly that it will take some action if it believes the rapid increase in bond yields will lead to tighter financial conditions. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been less explicit.</p><p><blockquote>持续抛售可能取决于我们在未来几天从央行行长那里听到的消息。本周晚些时候召开会议的欧洲央行已经明确表示，如果认为债券收益率快速上升将导致金融状况收紧，将采取一些行动。美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔没有那么明确。</blockquote></p><p>Blokland thinks that if the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note marches significantly higher this week, Powell may have no choice but to strongly assert that the Fed will act as necessary to ensure the economic recovery isn't affected by market turmoil.</p><p><blockquote>布洛克兰认为，如果本周10年期美国国债收益率大幅走高，鲍威尔可能别无选择，只能强烈断言美联储将采取必要行动，确保经济复苏不受市场动荡的影响。</blockquote></p><p>\"If we have another week like last week, [he has] to do something,\" Blokland said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果我们再有像上周那样的一周，[他]就必须做点什么，”布洛克兰说。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Top tech stocks are in correction territory. Here's why<blockquote>顶级科技股正处于调整区域。原因如下</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTop tech stocks are in correction territory. Here's why<blockquote>顶级科技股正处于调整区域。原因如下</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN Business</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-08 22:23</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Apple&nbsp;(AAPL)&nbsp;shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's stock is off 11% from a recent peak in early February. And chipmaker&nbsp;Nvidia&nbsp;(NVDA)&nbsp;has seen its shares plunge nearly 19% since the middle of last month.</p><p><blockquote><b>伦敦（CNN商业）——</b>苹果(AAPL)股价较1月份高点下跌超过15%。亚马逊股价较2月初的近期峰值下跌11%。芯片制造商英伟达(NVDA)的股价自上个月中旬以来已暴跌近19%。</blockquote></p><p>What's happening: Tech companies are getting hammered by the recent&nbsp;sell-off in markets. Many stocks in the sector have entered a correction, logging declines of at least 10% from their recent peaks.</p><p><blockquote>正在发生的事情：科技公司受到最近市场抛售的打击。该行业的许多股票已进入回调，较近期峰值下跌至少10%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite may not be far behind. The index finished Friday more than 8% below the record high notched on Feb. 12. Futures point to another rough trading session on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数可能也不甘落后。该指数周五收盘较2月12日创下的历史新高低8%以上。期货指向周一另一个艰难的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc50317ec0fe580acd1407307915d8fa\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"651\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Breaking it down: Investors have become increasingly worried that the reopening of many big economies later this year will lead to a spike in prices as people rush out to restaurants and book vacations. That could put pressure on central banks like the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p><blockquote>分解一下：投资者越来越担心，随着人们涌向餐馆和预订假期，今年晚些时候许多大型经济体的重新开放将导致价格飙升。这可能会给美联储等央行带来压力，要求其比预期更早加息。</blockquote></p><p>Rock-bottom rates have been a boon for fast-growing tech companies. They've helped keep yields on government bonds extremely low, boosting interest in riskier investments like stocks that offer better returns.</p><p><blockquote>最低利率对快速增长的科技公司来说是一个福音。它们帮助将政府债券的收益率保持在极低的水平，提高了人们对风险较高的投资的兴趣，例如提供更好回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p>But now, bond yields are rising on&nbsp;inflation concerns. That could make assets like US Treasuries start to appear more enticing — triggering outflows from the tech names that have been so popular over the past 11 months.</p><p><blockquote>但现在，由于通胀担忧，债券收益率正在上升。这可能会让美国国债等资产开始显得更具吸引力，引发过去11个月如此受欢迎的科技股资金外流。</blockquote></p><p>Jeroen Blokland, a portfolio manager at Robeco, thinks that as estimates for economic growth continue to improve, so-called \"value\" stocks in sectors like banking — which benefit from a healthy economy — may begin to get a second look.</p><p><blockquote>荷宝(Robeco)投资组合经理耶鲁安·布洛克兰(Jeroen Blokland)认为，随着对经济增长的预期不断改善，受益于健康经济的银行业等行业的所谓“价值”股票可能会开始受到重新审视。</blockquote></p><p>\"If you believe in this whole reopening and estimates of GDP growth ... that means growth is less scarce,\" he told me. \"[Then the] value sector has at least the possibility to play catch up.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果你相信整个重新开放和对GDP增长的估计……这意味着增长不那么稀缺，”他告诉我。“[那么]价值板块至少有可能迎头赶上。”</blockquote></p><p>See here: The KBW Bank Index, which tracks top US lenders, is up more than 20% this year. The Nasdaq, meanwhile, has almost wiped out all of its 2021 gains.</p><p><blockquote>请参阅此处：追踪美国顶级银行的KBW银行指数今年上涨了20%以上。与此同时，纳斯达克几乎抹去了2021年的所有涨幅。</blockquote></p><p>Many strategists think the declines are healthy, and that share prices of many tech companies shot up too much, too fast.</p><p><blockquote>许多策略师认为下跌是健康的，许多科技公司的股价上涨太多、太快。</blockquote></p><p>Continued selling may hinge on what we hear from central bankers in the coming days. The European Central Bank, which meets later this week, has stated clearly that it will take some action if it believes the rapid increase in bond yields will lead to tighter financial conditions. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been less explicit.</p><p><blockquote>持续抛售可能取决于我们在未来几天从央行行长那里听到的消息。本周晚些时候召开会议的欧洲央行已经明确表示，如果认为债券收益率快速上升将导致金融状况收紧，将采取一些行动。美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔没有那么明确。</blockquote></p><p>Blokland thinks that if the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note marches significantly higher this week, Powell may have no choice but to strongly assert that the Fed will act as necessary to ensure the economic recovery isn't affected by market turmoil.</p><p><blockquote>布洛克兰认为，如果本周10年期美国国债收益率大幅走高，鲍威尔可能别无选择，只能强烈断言美联储将采取必要行动，确保经济复苏不受市场动荡的影响。</blockquote></p><p>\"If we have another week like last week, [he has] to do something,\" Blokland said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果我们再有像上周那样的一周，[他]就必须做点什么，”布洛克兰说。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/08/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A","MSFT":"微软","NFLX":"奈飞","AMZN":"亚马逊","FB":"ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF","AAPL":"苹果","NVDA":"英伟达",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/08/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177211195","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Apple (AAPL) shares are down more than 15% from their January high. Amazon's stock is off 11% from a recent peak in early February. And chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA) has seen its shares plunge nearly 19% since the middle of last month.What's happening: Tech companies are getting hammered by the recent sell-off in markets. Many stocks in the sector have entered a correction, logging declines of at least 10% from their recent peaks.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite may not be far behind. The index finished Friday more than 8% below the record high notched on Feb. 12. Futures point to another rough trading session on Monday.Breaking it down: Investors have become increasingly worried that the reopening of many big economies later this year will lead to a spike in prices as people rush out to restaurants and book vacations. That could put pressure on central banks like the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates sooner than expected.Rock-bottom rates have been a boon for fast-growing tech companies. They've helped keep yields on government bonds extremely low, boosting interest in riskier investments like stocks that offer better returns.But now, bond yields are rising on inflation concerns. That could make assets like US Treasuries start to appear more enticing — triggering outflows from the tech names that have been so popular over the past 11 months.Jeroen Blokland, a portfolio manager at Robeco, thinks that as estimates for economic growth continue to improve, so-called \"value\" stocks in sectors like banking — which benefit from a healthy economy — may begin to get a second look.\"If you believe in this whole reopening and estimates of GDP growth ... that means growth is less scarce,\" he told me. \"[Then the] value sector has at least the possibility to play catch up.\"See here: The KBW Bank Index, which tracks top US lenders, is up more than 20% this year. The Nasdaq, meanwhile, has almost wiped out all of its 2021 gains.Many strategists think the declines are healthy, and that share prices of many tech companies shot up too much, too fast.Continued selling may hinge on what we hear from central bankers in the coming days. The European Central Bank, which meets later this week, has stated clearly that it will take some action if it believes the rapid increase in bond yields will lead to tighter financial conditions. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been less explicit.Blokland thinks that if the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note marches significantly higher this week, Powell may have no choice but to strongly assert that the Fed will act as necessary to ensure the economic recovery isn't affected by market turmoil.\"If we have another week like last week, [he has] to do something,\" Blokland said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"FB":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"NFLX":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"NVDA":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1502,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374380921,"gmtCreate":1619418749163,"gmtModify":1634273631761,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market correction is always healthy.&nbsp;","listText":"Market correction is always healthy.&nbsp;","text":"Market correction is always healthy.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/374380921","repostId":"1158968268","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1679,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357185457,"gmtCreate":1617246830679,"gmtModify":1634521821979,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Money, money and more money!! 😂","listText":"Money, money and more money!! 😂","text":"Money, money and more money!! 😂","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357185457","repostId":"1172735914","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2053,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327904493,"gmtCreate":1616045517412,"gmtModify":1703496830771,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fed has stated&nbsp;their position, and market is happy with it. 😂","listText":"Fed has stated&nbsp;their position, and market is happy with it. 😂","text":"Fed has stated their position, and market is happy with it. 😂","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327904493","repostId":"1190013109","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1588,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191217340,"gmtCreate":1620880502280,"gmtModify":1634195594347,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow.... still don’t understand&nbsp;how he can link bitcoins mining to fossil fuels. Anyone care to explain?Maybe he wants to accumulate more at super low price. 😜","listText":"Wow.... still don’t understand&nbsp;how he can link bitcoins mining to fossil fuels. Anyone care to explain?Maybe he wants to accumulate more at super low price. 😜","text":"Wow.... still don’t understand how he can link bitcoins mining to fossil fuels. Anyone care to explain?Maybe he wants to accumulate more at super low price. 😜","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/191217340","repostId":"1123539919","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1528,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351487117,"gmtCreate":1616626624139,"gmtModify":1634524899190,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hahaha,&nbsp;Who can predict the price of Bitcoin in the future? 😂","listText":"Hahaha,&nbsp;Who can predict the price of Bitcoin in the future? 😂","text":"Hahaha, Who can predict the price of Bitcoin in the future? 😂","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351487117","repostId":"2121457670","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1588,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327128921,"gmtCreate":1616071907063,"gmtModify":1634527392484,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Economy pick up, good? If inflation goes up, which is better, stocks or bonds?","listText":"Economy pick up, good? If inflation goes up, which is better, stocks or bonds?","text":"Economy pick up, good? If inflation goes up, which is better, stocks or bonds?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327128921","repostId":"2120308231","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1642,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324381115,"gmtCreate":1615963809237,"gmtModify":1703495596253,"author":{"id":"3573824362072096","authorId":"3573824362072096","name":"YHY73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be96a5b065c45430edc271b22e18172a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573824362072096","idStr":"3573824362072096"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market is seems like depending on Fed for next move. 😅","listText":"Market is seems like depending on Fed for next move. 😅","text":"Market is seems like depending on Fed for next move. 😅","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/324381115","repostId":"1103121082","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103121082","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615948559,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103121082?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-17 10:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Easy Money, the Dot Plot, and the Fed’s Dilemma: An Investor Guide to a Key Meeting<blockquote>宽松货币、点阵图和美联储的困境：重要会议的投资者指南</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103121082","media":"Barrons","summary":"The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter ec","content":"<p>The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter economic forecasts while trying to assure investors that it is still “not thinking about thinking about” lifting interest rates—and that it doesn’t need to.</p><p><blockquote>美联储本周面临着一个尴尬的平衡行为：它可能会立即发布更光明的经济预测，同时试图向投资者保证它仍然“不考虑考虑”加息——而且也不需要加息。</blockquote></p><p> More-optimistic estimates for gross domestic product, unemployment and inflation would typically prompt an acknowledgement that monetary policy would, in turn, begin to tighten. For a data-dependent Fed, the message that the economy is improving much faster than expected is at odds with the message that rates will remain near zero through 2023. How the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy arm, tries to square those conflicting dynamics will be in focus as investors take in new economic forecasts, the dot plot showing updated rate predictions, and Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference.</p><p><blockquote>对国内生产总值、失业率和通胀的更乐观估计通常会促使人们承认货币政策将反过来开始收紧。对于依赖数据的美联储来说，经济改善速度远快于预期的信息与利率将在2023年之前保持在接近零的信息不一致。随着投资者接受新的经济预测、显示最新利率预测的点阵图以及主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的新闻发布会，美联储的政策机构联邦公开市场委员会如何试图解决这些相互冲突的动态将成为焦点。</blockquote></p><p> “It’s a fine line for them to walk,” says Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial economist at Oxford Economics, as the bond market prices in more tightening amid improving economic data, Covid-19 vaccinations, and building inflation concerns, while the Fed reiterates its dovish stance. “How do you telegraph patience while conveying you won’t be behind the curve?”</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院首席美国金融经济学家凯西·博斯特詹西奇(Kathy Bostjancic)表示：“这对他们来说是一条微妙的界限。”随着经济数据改善、Covid-19疫苗接种和通胀担忧加剧，债券市场价格将进一步收紧，而美联储则重申其鸽派立场。“你如何在传达你不会落后的同时表现出耐心？”</blockquote></p><p> The rate decision and updated materials will be released this Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern time, with Powell’s question-and-answer session following. Here is a run down of what Wall Street is watching.</p><p><blockquote>费率决定和更新材料将于本周三下午2点发布。东部时间，接下来是鲍威尔的问答环节。以下是华尔街正在关注的内容。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Updated economic forecasts:</b>In the December Summary of Economic Projections, the FOMC projected 4.2% GDP growth for 2021 and 3.2% for 2022, bringing its inflation expectation to 2% by the end of 2023 and thus implying rates would begin to rise in 2024.</p><p><blockquote><b>更新的经济预测：</b>在12月份的经济预测摘要中，FOMC预计2021年GDP增长4.2%，2022年增长3.2%，到2023年底通胀预期达到2%，从而意味着利率将在2024年开始上升。</blockquote></p><p> Aneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies, thinks the FOMC will raise GDP forecasts for the next two years to about 6% and 4%, respectively. This should push the unemployment rate below the natural rate (the lowest unemployment rate an economy can sustain with inflation remaining stable) by the second half of 2022, she says, meaning the 2% inflation forecast would be pulled forward to the end of 2022—and the first rate hike therefore pulled forward to 2023. (In December, the Fed projected inflation at a 1.8% rate at the end of this year.)</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)首席经济学家Aneta Markowska认为，FOMC将把未来两年的GDP预期分别上调至6%和4%左右。她表示，到2022年下半年，这将使失业率低于自然失业率（在通胀保持稳定的情况下，一个经济体可以维持的最低失业率），这意味着2%的通胀预测将提前到2022年底——因此首次加息提前到2023年。（去年12月，美联储预计今年年底通胀率为1.8%。）</blockquote></p><p> Fed officials have expressed comfort in letting inflation run hotter than the 2% target. The question is by how much. Even though the FOMC will likely repeat that the recovery will slow after this year, new forecasts may show inflation of over 2% in both 2022 and 2023 alongside an unemployment rate of 3.5% by the end of 2023, thereby meeting the Fed’s criteria of inflation above 2% and “maximum employment,” says David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Funds.</p><p><blockquote>美联储官员对让通胀率高于2%的目标表示欣慰。问题是增加多少。尽管FOMC可能会重申今年之后复苏将放缓，但新的预测可能会显示2022年和2023年的通胀率都将超过2%，到2023年底失业率将达到3.5%，从而满足美联储的标准摩根大通基金首席全球策略师大卫·凯利表示，通胀率高于2%和“最大就业”。</blockquote></p><p> Some economists, however, say the Fed may focus more on a broader unemployment rate, known as the U-6 rate, that includes discouraged workers plus those who are working part time but would prefer to work full time, among others. That would give policy makers more breathing room given how much higher U-6 stands (11.1%) compared with the “official” U-3 rate (6.2%).</p><p><blockquote>然而，一些经济学家表示，美联储可能会更多地关注更广泛的失业率，即U-6失业率，其中包括灰心丧气的工人以及那些从事兼职工作但更愿意全职工作的人等。鉴于U-6比率(11.1%)比“官方”U-3比率(6.2%)高得多，这将给政策制定者更多的喘息空间。</blockquote></p><p> Given the Fed’s new policy framework defines maximum employment as consisting of ‘broad-based and inclusive’ employment, investors looking to handicap the Fed’s next rate move should monitor the U-6 unemployment rate, says Bostjancic of Oxford Economics.</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院的Bostjancic表示，鉴于美联储的新政策框架将最大就业定义为“基础广泛且包容性”的就业，希望阻碍美联储下一次利率变动的投资者应该关注U-6失业率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dot plot:</b>In December, only one of 17 FOMC members submitting forecasts saw a rate hike by the end of 2022 and five saw a rate hike by the end of 2023. While some economists say Fed officials may be wary of lifting their dots, or appearing more hawkish and thereby adding fuel to a surge in long-term interest rates that has been under way, others say the Fed has to show some change in its rate outlook.</p><p><blockquote><b>点阵图：</b>去年12月，在提交预测的17名FOMC成员中，只有一人预计在2022年底前加息，五人预计在2023年底前加息。尽管一些经济学家表示，美联储官员可能会对解除他们的立场持谨慎态度，或者表现得更加鹰派，从而为正在进行的长期利率飙升火上浇油，但其他人表示，美联储必须在利率前景上表现出一些变化。</blockquote></p><p> “Given the magnitude of the likely forecast revisions, it would be hard to justify no change in the policy outlook,” says Markowska. “Not doing so would be inconsistent with data-dependency and would strongly suggest that the Fed is calendar dependent (which the Fed insists it isn’t).” At the same time, she says, the Fed hasn’t pushed back against the recent repricing of rate expectations, which is an implicit endorsement of what’s already priced in.</p><p><blockquote>马科夫斯卡表示：“考虑到可能的预测修正幅度，很难证明政策前景不发生变化是合理的。”“不这样做将与数据依赖性不一致，并强烈表明美联储依赖日历（美联储坚称事实并非如此）。”与此同时，她表示，美联储并没有反对最近对利率预期的重新定价，这是对已经定价的内容的含蓄认可。</blockquote></p><p> Bostjancic expects the median forecast to show at least one 0.25% rate hike during 2023, while Markowska thinks the median 2023 dot could rise to 0.375% (she notes only 4 members need to lift their dots—or signal a higher expected Fed funds rate by the end of 2023—to move the median rate projection. The bond market has priced in three quarter-point increases by the end of 2023.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic预计预测中值将显示2023年至少加息一次0.25%，而Markowska认为2023年dot中值可能升至0.375%（她指出，只有4名成员需要提高dot，或发出更高的预期联邦基金利率到2023年底——以调整利率预测中值。债券市场已消化到2023年底加息三个四分之一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Bond market action:</b>How the Treasury market reacts to the new Fed information will be at least as interesting as the information itself. Instead of the Fed potentially catching up to where the market already is in terms of rate expectations, Bostjancic says even a whiff of the Fed pulling forward rate hike expectations could spur the bond market to price in more tightening.</p><p><blockquote><b>债市动作：</b>国债市场对美联储新信息的反应至少和信息本身一样有趣。博斯特扬西奇表示，美联储可能不会赶上市场在利率预期方面已经达到的水平，而是即使美联储稍微提高加息预期，也可能会刺激债券市场消化更多紧缩政策。</blockquote></p><p> Ian Lyngen, head of rates strategy at BMO Capital, says chances are low Powell will meaningfully alter his stance on the recent yield action, maintaining that as long as the move is driven by an improving economic outlook and inflation expectations, the repricing is for the right reasons. “Needless to say, higher yields are good until they are not and it’s just such an inflection point that represents the more significant policy risk for the Fed,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>BMO Capital利率策略主管伊恩·林根(Ian Lyngen)表示，鲍威尔大幅改变近期收益率走势立场的可能性很低，他坚称，只要此举是由经济前景和通胀预期改善推动的，重新定价就是正确的原因。他表示：“不用说，收益率上升是好事，直到收益率下降，而正是这样一个拐点代表了美联储更重大的政策风险。”</blockquote></p><p> Lyngen is watching the 1.64% level on the 10-year (it was last week’s yield peak as well as the highest for the benchmark since early-February 2020) and has a 1.75% target on the note.</p><p><blockquote>Lyngen正在关注10年期债券1.64%的水平（这是上周的收益率峰值，也是2020年2月初以来基准收益率的最高水平），并将该债券的目标定为1.75%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>SLR exemption extension:</b>Potentially contributing to bond market action on Wednesday will be any signal around the Fed’s plan for a popular program launched last April, as pandemic-driven shutdowns cascaded.</p><p><blockquote><b>SLR豁免延期：</b>随着大流行导致的停工层出不穷，围绕美联储去年4月推出的一项受欢迎计划的任何信号都可能推动周三的债券市场行动。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street is hoping for an extension of a temporary exemption of Treasuries and bank deposits at the Fed Reserve Banks from the banks’ Supplementary Leverage Ratio, which requires financial institutions hold a minimum ratio of at least 3% in capital measured against their total leverage exposure. The exemption is set to expire at the end of March.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街希望延长美联储银行的国债和银行存款对银行补充杠杆率的临时豁免，该规定要求金融机构持有的资本相对于其总杠杆敞口至少为3%的最低比率。该豁免将于三月底到期。</blockquote></p><p> The exemption’s fate has big implications. Over the past year, banks have increased their purchases of Treasuries by a large $854 billion, while bank reserves have ballooned by $1.8 trillion, Bostjancic notes. Economists say the lack of an extension could significantly lessen banks’ appetite for Treasuries, putting even more upward pressure on yields.</p><p><blockquote>豁免的命运有着重大影响。Bostjancic指出，过去一年，银行购买的国债数量大幅增加了8540亿美元，而银行准备金则激增了1.8万亿美元。经济学家表示，缺乏延期可能会大大降低银行对美国国债的兴趣，给收益率带来更大的上行压力。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Further easing watch:</b>Wall Street generally doesn’t expect more easing unless yields stage a more disorderly surge and financial conditions meaningfully tighten. For now, the FOMC “is reasonably well positioned to stay the course for the time being,” Lyngen says, “even if such an outcome involves the risk of tacitly endorsing a further Treasury selloff at stage when investors are wary, if not worried.”</p><p><blockquote><b>进一步宽松观察：</b>华尔街普遍预计不会有更多宽松政策，除非收益率出现更无序的飙升并且金融状况有意义地收紧。林根表示，就目前而言，联邦公开市场委员会“处于相当有利的地位，可以暂时坚持到底”，“即使这样的结果涉及在投资者保持警惕（如果不是担心的话）的阶段默许进一步抛售国债的风险。”</blockquote></p><p> As for potential responses to any disorderly jump in yields, economists say the Fed has a few options. Most immediately, the Fed could opt to lengthen the duration of its current asset purchases, says Bostjancic. As of December, the average maturity under the current program was 7.4 years, she says, adding that policy makers could start buying 10- to 30-year Treasuries. Doing so would effectively be one part of a new “operation twist,” with the other leg involving the sale of short-date Treasury bills, Bostjancic says.</p><p><blockquote>至于对收益率无序跃升的潜在反应，经济学家表示，美联储有几个选择。Bostjancic表示，最直接的是，美联储可能会选择延长当前资产购买的期限。她表示，截至12月，当前计划下的平均期限为7.4年，并补充说政策制定者可以开始购买10至30年期国债。Bostjancic表示，这样做实际上是新“扭曲行动”的一部分，另一部分涉及短期国库券的销售。</blockquote></p><p> If financial conditions tighten much more sharply and buying further out on the yield curve proves insufficient, Bostjancic and others say the Fed could attempt yield curve control.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic和其他人表示，如果金融状况更加急剧收紧，并且在收益率曲线上进一步买入被证明是不够的，美联储可能会尝试控制收益率曲线。</blockquote></p><p> YCC, undertaken by the Fed after World War II, the Bank of Japan in 2016, and the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2020, aims to control interest rates along some portion of the yield curve, targeting longer-term rates directly by imposing interest rate caps on particular maturities.As economists at the St. Louis Fed put it, because bond prices and yields are inversely related, this also implies a price floor for targeted maturities: if bond prices (yields) of targeted maturities remain above (below) the floor, the central bank does nothing. But if prices fall (rise) below (above) the floor, the central bank buys targeted-maturity bonds—increasing the demand and thus the price of those bonds.</p><p><blockquote>YCC由二战后的美联储、2016年的日本央行和2020年的澳大利亚储备银行实施，旨在控制收益率曲线某一部分的利率，通过对特定期限的利率施加利率上限，直接瞄准长期利率。正如圣路易斯联储经济学家所言，由于债券价格和收益率呈负相关，这也意味着目标期限的价格下限：如果目标期限的债券价格（收益率）保持在下限之上（之下），央行什么也不做。但如果价格跌（涨）低于（高于）下限，央行就会购买定向到期债券——增加需求，从而提高这些债券的价格。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Easy Money, the Dot Plot, and the Fed’s Dilemma: An Investor Guide to a Key Meeting<blockquote>宽松货币、点阵图和美联储的困境：重要会议的投资者指南</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEasy Money, the Dot Plot, and the Fed’s Dilemma: An Investor Guide to a Key Meeting<blockquote>宽松货币、点阵图和美联储的困境：重要会议的投资者指南</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-17 10:35</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter economic forecasts while trying to assure investors that it is still “not thinking about thinking about” lifting interest rates—and that it doesn’t need to.</p><p><blockquote>美联储本周面临着一个尴尬的平衡行为：它可能会立即发布更光明的经济预测，同时试图向投资者保证它仍然“不考虑考虑”加息——而且也不需要加息。</blockquote></p><p> More-optimistic estimates for gross domestic product, unemployment and inflation would typically prompt an acknowledgement that monetary policy would, in turn, begin to tighten. For a data-dependent Fed, the message that the economy is improving much faster than expected is at odds with the message that rates will remain near zero through 2023. How the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy arm, tries to square those conflicting dynamics will be in focus as investors take in new economic forecasts, the dot plot showing updated rate predictions, and Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference.</p><p><blockquote>对国内生产总值、失业率和通胀的更乐观估计通常会促使人们承认货币政策将反过来开始收紧。对于依赖数据的美联储来说，经济改善速度远快于预期的信息与利率将在2023年之前保持在接近零的信息不一致。随着投资者接受新的经济预测、显示最新利率预测的点阵图以及主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的新闻发布会，美联储的政策机构联邦公开市场委员会如何试图解决这些相互冲突的动态将成为焦点。</blockquote></p><p> “It’s a fine line for them to walk,” says Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial economist at Oxford Economics, as the bond market prices in more tightening amid improving economic data, Covid-19 vaccinations, and building inflation concerns, while the Fed reiterates its dovish stance. “How do you telegraph patience while conveying you won’t be behind the curve?”</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院首席美国金融经济学家凯西·博斯特詹西奇(Kathy Bostjancic)表示：“这对他们来说是一条微妙的界限。”随着经济数据改善、Covid-19疫苗接种和通胀担忧加剧，债券市场价格将进一步收紧，而美联储则重申其鸽派立场。“你如何在传达你不会落后的同时表现出耐心？”</blockquote></p><p> The rate decision and updated materials will be released this Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern time, with Powell’s question-and-answer session following. Here is a run down of what Wall Street is watching.</p><p><blockquote>费率决定和更新材料将于本周三下午2点发布。东部时间，接下来是鲍威尔的问答环节。以下是华尔街正在关注的内容。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Updated economic forecasts:</b>In the December Summary of Economic Projections, the FOMC projected 4.2% GDP growth for 2021 and 3.2% for 2022, bringing its inflation expectation to 2% by the end of 2023 and thus implying rates would begin to rise in 2024.</p><p><blockquote><b>更新的经济预测：</b>在12月份的经济预测摘要中，FOMC预计2021年GDP增长4.2%，2022年增长3.2%，到2023年底通胀预期达到2%，从而意味着利率将在2024年开始上升。</blockquote></p><p> Aneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies, thinks the FOMC will raise GDP forecasts for the next two years to about 6% and 4%, respectively. This should push the unemployment rate below the natural rate (the lowest unemployment rate an economy can sustain with inflation remaining stable) by the second half of 2022, she says, meaning the 2% inflation forecast would be pulled forward to the end of 2022—and the first rate hike therefore pulled forward to 2023. (In December, the Fed projected inflation at a 1.8% rate at the end of this year.)</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)首席经济学家Aneta Markowska认为，FOMC将把未来两年的GDP预期分别上调至6%和4%左右。她表示，到2022年下半年，这将使失业率低于自然失业率（在通胀保持稳定的情况下，一个经济体可以维持的最低失业率），这意味着2%的通胀预测将提前到2022年底——因此首次加息提前到2023年。（去年12月，美联储预计今年年底通胀率为1.8%。）</blockquote></p><p> Fed officials have expressed comfort in letting inflation run hotter than the 2% target. The question is by how much. Even though the FOMC will likely repeat that the recovery will slow after this year, new forecasts may show inflation of over 2% in both 2022 and 2023 alongside an unemployment rate of 3.5% by the end of 2023, thereby meeting the Fed’s criteria of inflation above 2% and “maximum employment,” says David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Funds.</p><p><blockquote>美联储官员对让通胀率高于2%的目标表示欣慰。问题是增加多少。尽管FOMC可能会重申今年之后复苏将放缓，但新的预测可能会显示2022年和2023年的通胀率都将超过2%，到2023年底失业率将达到3.5%，从而满足美联储的标准摩根大通基金首席全球策略师大卫·凯利表示，通胀率高于2%和“最大就业”。</blockquote></p><p> Some economists, however, say the Fed may focus more on a broader unemployment rate, known as the U-6 rate, that includes discouraged workers plus those who are working part time but would prefer to work full time, among others. That would give policy makers more breathing room given how much higher U-6 stands (11.1%) compared with the “official” U-3 rate (6.2%).</p><p><blockquote>然而，一些经济学家表示，美联储可能会更多地关注更广泛的失业率，即U-6失业率，其中包括灰心丧气的工人以及那些从事兼职工作但更愿意全职工作的人等。鉴于U-6比率(11.1%)比“官方”U-3比率(6.2%)高得多，这将给政策制定者更多的喘息空间。</blockquote></p><p> Given the Fed’s new policy framework defines maximum employment as consisting of ‘broad-based and inclusive’ employment, investors looking to handicap the Fed’s next rate move should monitor the U-6 unemployment rate, says Bostjancic of Oxford Economics.</p><p><blockquote>牛津经济研究院的Bostjancic表示，鉴于美联储的新政策框架将最大就业定义为“基础广泛且包容性”的就业，希望阻碍美联储下一次利率变动的投资者应该关注U-6失业率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dot plot:</b>In December, only one of 17 FOMC members submitting forecasts saw a rate hike by the end of 2022 and five saw a rate hike by the end of 2023. While some economists say Fed officials may be wary of lifting their dots, or appearing more hawkish and thereby adding fuel to a surge in long-term interest rates that has been under way, others say the Fed has to show some change in its rate outlook.</p><p><blockquote><b>点阵图：</b>去年12月，在提交预测的17名FOMC成员中，只有一人预计在2022年底前加息，五人预计在2023年底前加息。尽管一些经济学家表示，美联储官员可能会对解除他们的立场持谨慎态度，或者表现得更加鹰派，从而为正在进行的长期利率飙升火上浇油，但其他人表示，美联储必须在利率前景上表现出一些变化。</blockquote></p><p> “Given the magnitude of the likely forecast revisions, it would be hard to justify no change in the policy outlook,” says Markowska. “Not doing so would be inconsistent with data-dependency and would strongly suggest that the Fed is calendar dependent (which the Fed insists it isn’t).” At the same time, she says, the Fed hasn’t pushed back against the recent repricing of rate expectations, which is an implicit endorsement of what’s already priced in.</p><p><blockquote>马科夫斯卡表示：“考虑到可能的预测修正幅度，很难证明政策前景不发生变化是合理的。”“不这样做将与数据依赖性不一致，并强烈表明美联储依赖日历（美联储坚称事实并非如此）。”与此同时，她表示，美联储并没有反对最近对利率预期的重新定价，这是对已经定价的内容的含蓄认可。</blockquote></p><p> Bostjancic expects the median forecast to show at least one 0.25% rate hike during 2023, while Markowska thinks the median 2023 dot could rise to 0.375% (she notes only 4 members need to lift their dots—or signal a higher expected Fed funds rate by the end of 2023—to move the median rate projection. The bond market has priced in three quarter-point increases by the end of 2023.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic预计预测中值将显示2023年至少加息一次0.25%，而Markowska认为2023年dot中值可能升至0.375%（她指出，只有4名成员需要提高dot，或发出更高的预期联邦基金利率到2023年底——以调整利率预测中值。债券市场已消化到2023年底加息三个四分之一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Bond market action:</b>How the Treasury market reacts to the new Fed information will be at least as interesting as the information itself. Instead of the Fed potentially catching up to where the market already is in terms of rate expectations, Bostjancic says even a whiff of the Fed pulling forward rate hike expectations could spur the bond market to price in more tightening.</p><p><blockquote><b>债市动作：</b>国债市场对美联储新信息的反应至少和信息本身一样有趣。博斯特扬西奇表示，美联储可能不会赶上市场在利率预期方面已经达到的水平，而是即使美联储稍微提高加息预期，也可能会刺激债券市场消化更多紧缩政策。</blockquote></p><p> Ian Lyngen, head of rates strategy at BMO Capital, says chances are low Powell will meaningfully alter his stance on the recent yield action, maintaining that as long as the move is driven by an improving economic outlook and inflation expectations, the repricing is for the right reasons. “Needless to say, higher yields are good until they are not and it’s just such an inflection point that represents the more significant policy risk for the Fed,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>BMO Capital利率策略主管伊恩·林根(Ian Lyngen)表示，鲍威尔大幅改变近期收益率走势立场的可能性很低，他坚称，只要此举是由经济前景和通胀预期改善推动的，重新定价就是正确的原因。他表示：“不用说，收益率上升是好事，直到收益率下降，而正是这样一个拐点代表了美联储更重大的政策风险。”</blockquote></p><p> Lyngen is watching the 1.64% level on the 10-year (it was last week’s yield peak as well as the highest for the benchmark since early-February 2020) and has a 1.75% target on the note.</p><p><blockquote>Lyngen正在关注10年期债券1.64%的水平（这是上周的收益率峰值，也是2020年2月初以来基准收益率的最高水平），并将该债券的目标定为1.75%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>SLR exemption extension:</b>Potentially contributing to bond market action on Wednesday will be any signal around the Fed’s plan for a popular program launched last April, as pandemic-driven shutdowns cascaded.</p><p><blockquote><b>SLR豁免延期：</b>随着大流行导致的停工层出不穷，围绕美联储去年4月推出的一项受欢迎计划的任何信号都可能推动周三的债券市场行动。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street is hoping for an extension of a temporary exemption of Treasuries and bank deposits at the Fed Reserve Banks from the banks’ Supplementary Leverage Ratio, which requires financial institutions hold a minimum ratio of at least 3% in capital measured against their total leverage exposure. The exemption is set to expire at the end of March.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街希望延长美联储银行的国债和银行存款对银行补充杠杆率的临时豁免，该规定要求金融机构持有的资本相对于其总杠杆敞口至少为3%的最低比率。该豁免将于三月底到期。</blockquote></p><p> The exemption’s fate has big implications. Over the past year, banks have increased their purchases of Treasuries by a large $854 billion, while bank reserves have ballooned by $1.8 trillion, Bostjancic notes. Economists say the lack of an extension could significantly lessen banks’ appetite for Treasuries, putting even more upward pressure on yields.</p><p><blockquote>豁免的命运有着重大影响。Bostjancic指出，过去一年，银行购买的国债数量大幅增加了8540亿美元，而银行准备金则激增了1.8万亿美元。经济学家表示，缺乏延期可能会大大降低银行对美国国债的兴趣，给收益率带来更大的上行压力。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Further easing watch:</b>Wall Street generally doesn’t expect more easing unless yields stage a more disorderly surge and financial conditions meaningfully tighten. For now, the FOMC “is reasonably well positioned to stay the course for the time being,” Lyngen says, “even if such an outcome involves the risk of tacitly endorsing a further Treasury selloff at stage when investors are wary, if not worried.”</p><p><blockquote><b>进一步宽松观察：</b>华尔街普遍预计不会有更多宽松政策，除非收益率出现更无序的飙升并且金融状况有意义地收紧。林根表示，就目前而言，联邦公开市场委员会“处于相当有利的地位，可以暂时坚持到底”，“即使这样的结果涉及在投资者保持警惕（如果不是担心的话）的阶段默许进一步抛售国债的风险。”</blockquote></p><p> As for potential responses to any disorderly jump in yields, economists say the Fed has a few options. Most immediately, the Fed could opt to lengthen the duration of its current asset purchases, says Bostjancic. As of December, the average maturity under the current program was 7.4 years, she says, adding that policy makers could start buying 10- to 30-year Treasuries. Doing so would effectively be one part of a new “operation twist,” with the other leg involving the sale of short-date Treasury bills, Bostjancic says.</p><p><blockquote>至于对收益率无序跃升的潜在反应，经济学家表示，美联储有几个选择。Bostjancic表示，最直接的是，美联储可能会选择延长当前资产购买的期限。她表示，截至12月，当前计划下的平均期限为7.4年，并补充说政策制定者可以开始购买10至30年期国债。Bostjancic表示，这样做实际上是新“扭曲行动”的一部分，另一部分涉及短期国库券的销售。</blockquote></p><p> If financial conditions tighten much more sharply and buying further out on the yield curve proves insufficient, Bostjancic and others say the Fed could attempt yield curve control.</p><p><blockquote>Bostjancic和其他人表示，如果金融状况更加急剧收紧，并且在收益率曲线上进一步买入被证明是不够的，美联储可能会尝试控制收益率曲线。</blockquote></p><p> YCC, undertaken by the Fed after World War II, the Bank of Japan in 2016, and the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2020, aims to control interest rates along some portion of the yield curve, targeting longer-term rates directly by imposing interest rate caps on particular maturities.As economists at the St. Louis Fed put it, because bond prices and yields are inversely related, this also implies a price floor for targeted maturities: if bond prices (yields) of targeted maturities remain above (below) the floor, the central bank does nothing. But if prices fall (rise) below (above) the floor, the central bank buys targeted-maturity bonds—increasing the demand and thus the price of those bonds.</p><p><blockquote>YCC由二战后的美联储、2016年的日本央行和2020年的澳大利亚储备银行实施，旨在控制收益率曲线某一部分的利率，通过对特定期限的利率施加利率上限，直接瞄准长期利率。正如圣路易斯联储经济学家所言，由于债券价格和收益率呈负相关，这也意味着目标期限的价格下限：如果目标期限的债券价格（收益率）保持在下限之上（之下），央行什么也不做。但如果价格跌（涨）低于（高于）下限，央行就会购买定向到期债券——增加需求，从而提高这些债券的价格。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/easy-money-the-dot-plot-and-the-feds-dilemma-an-investor-guide-to-a-key-meeting-51615905001?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/easy-money-the-dot-plot-and-the-feds-dilemma-an-investor-guide-to-a-key-meeting-51615905001?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103121082","content_text":"The Federal Reserve has an awkward balancing act this week: It’s likely to at once issue brighter economic forecasts while trying to assure investors that it is still “not thinking about thinking about” lifting interest rates—and that it doesn’t need to.\nMore-optimistic estimates for gross domestic product, unemployment and inflation would typically prompt an acknowledgement that monetary policy would, in turn, begin to tighten. For a data-dependent Fed, the message that the economy is improving much faster than expected is at odds with the message that rates will remain near zero through 2023. How the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy arm, tries to square those conflicting dynamics will be in focus as investors take in new economic forecasts, the dot plot showing updated rate predictions, and Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference.\n“It’s a fine line for them to walk,” says Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial economist at Oxford Economics, as the bond market prices in more tightening amid improving economic data, Covid-19 vaccinations, and building inflation concerns, while the Fed reiterates its dovish stance. “How do you telegraph patience while conveying you won’t be behind the curve?”\nThe rate decision and updated materials will be released this Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern time, with Powell’s question-and-answer session following. Here is a run down of what Wall Street is watching.\nUpdated economic forecasts:In the December Summary of Economic Projections, the FOMC projected 4.2% GDP growth for 2021 and 3.2% for 2022, bringing its inflation expectation to 2% by the end of 2023 and thus implying rates would begin to rise in 2024.\nAneta Markowska, chief economist at Jefferies, thinks the FOMC will raise GDP forecasts for the next two years to about 6% and 4%, respectively. This should push the unemployment rate below the natural rate (the lowest unemployment rate an economy can sustain with inflation remaining stable) by the second half of 2022, she says, meaning the 2% inflation forecast would be pulled forward to the end of 2022—and the first rate hike therefore pulled forward to 2023. (In December, the Fed projected inflation at a 1.8% rate at the end of this year.)\nFed officials have expressed comfort in letting inflation run hotter than the 2% target. The question is by how much. Even though the FOMC will likely repeat that the recovery will slow after this year, new forecasts may show inflation of over 2% in both 2022 and 2023 alongside an unemployment rate of 3.5% by the end of 2023, thereby meeting the Fed’s criteria of inflation above 2% and “maximum employment,” says David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Funds.\nSome economists, however, say the Fed may focus more on a broader unemployment rate, known as the U-6 rate, that includes discouraged workers plus those who are working part time but would prefer to work full time, among others. That would give policy makers more breathing room given how much higher U-6 stands (11.1%) compared with the “official” U-3 rate (6.2%).\nGiven the Fed’s new policy framework defines maximum employment as consisting of ‘broad-based and inclusive’ employment, investors looking to handicap the Fed’s next rate move should monitor the U-6 unemployment rate, says Bostjancic of Oxford Economics.\nThe dot plot:In December, only one of 17 FOMC members submitting forecasts saw a rate hike by the end of 2022 and five saw a rate hike by the end of 2023. While some economists say Fed officials may be wary of lifting their dots, or appearing more hawkish and thereby adding fuel to a surge in long-term interest rates that has been under way, others say the Fed has to show some change in its rate outlook.\n“Given the magnitude of the likely forecast revisions, it would be hard to justify no change in the policy outlook,” says Markowska. “Not doing so would be inconsistent with data-dependency and would strongly suggest that the Fed is calendar dependent (which the Fed insists it isn’t).” At the same time, she says, the Fed hasn’t pushed back against the recent repricing of rate expectations, which is an implicit endorsement of what’s already priced in.\nBostjancic expects the median forecast to show at least one 0.25% rate hike during 2023, while Markowska thinks the median 2023 dot could rise to 0.375% (she notes only 4 members need to lift their dots—or signal a higher expected Fed funds rate by the end of 2023—to move the median rate projection. The bond market has priced in three quarter-point increases by the end of 2023.\nBond market action:How the Treasury market reacts to the new Fed information will be at least as interesting as the information itself. Instead of the Fed potentially catching up to where the market already is in terms of rate expectations, Bostjancic says even a whiff of the Fed pulling forward rate hike expectations could spur the bond market to price in more tightening.\nIan Lyngen, head of rates strategy at BMO Capital, says chances are low Powell will meaningfully alter his stance on the recent yield action, maintaining that as long as the move is driven by an improving economic outlook and inflation expectations, the repricing is for the right reasons. “Needless to say, higher yields are good until they are not and it’s just such an inflection point that represents the more significant policy risk for the Fed,” he says.\nLyngen is watching the 1.64% level on the 10-year (it was last week’s yield peak as well as the highest for the benchmark since early-February 2020) and has a 1.75% target on the note.\nSLR exemption extension:Potentially contributing to bond market action on Wednesday will be any signal around the Fed’s plan for a popular program launched last April, as pandemic-driven shutdowns cascaded.\nWall Street is hoping for an extension of a temporary exemption of Treasuries and bank deposits at the Fed Reserve Banks from the banks’ Supplementary Leverage Ratio, which requires financial institutions hold a minimum ratio of at least 3% in capital measured against their total leverage exposure. The exemption is set to expire at the end of March.\nThe exemption’s fate has big implications. Over the past year, banks have increased their purchases of Treasuries by a large $854 billion, while bank reserves have ballooned by $1.8 trillion, Bostjancic notes. Economists say the lack of an extension could significantly lessen banks’ appetite for Treasuries, putting even more upward pressure on yields.\nFurther easing watch:Wall Street generally doesn’t expect more easing unless yields stage a more disorderly surge and financial conditions meaningfully tighten. For now, the FOMC “is reasonably well positioned to stay the course for the time being,” Lyngen says, “even if such an outcome involves the risk of tacitly endorsing a further Treasury selloff at stage when investors are wary, if not worried.”\nAs for potential responses to any disorderly jump in yields, economists say the Fed has a few options. Most immediately, the Fed could opt to lengthen the duration of its current asset purchases, says Bostjancic. As of December, the average maturity under the current program was 7.4 years, she says, adding that policy makers could start buying 10- to 30-year Treasuries. Doing so would effectively be one part of a new “operation twist,” with the other leg involving the sale of short-date Treasury bills, Bostjancic says.\nIf financial conditions tighten much more sharply and buying further out on the yield curve proves insufficient, Bostjancic and others say the Fed could attempt yield curve control.\nYCC, undertaken by the Fed after World War II, the Bank of Japan in 2016, and the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2020, aims to control interest rates along some portion of the yield curve, targeting longer-term rates directly by imposing interest rate caps on particular maturities.As economists at the St. Louis Fed put it, because bond prices and yields are inversely related, this also implies a price floor for targeted maturities: if bond prices (yields) of targeted maturities remain above (below) the floor, the central bank does nothing. But if prices fall (rise) below (above) the floor, the central bank buys targeted-maturity bonds—increasing the demand and thus the price of those bonds.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1470,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}