+关注
MERV
OK
IP属地:未知
2
关注
24
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
MERV
2021-11-17
Like pls ty
Better Buy: Square vs. Afterpay<blockquote>更好的选择:Square与Afterpay</blockquote>
MERV
2021-11-08
Like pls
Mark Cuban-backed FiscalNote to go public via $1.3 billion SPAC deal<blockquote>马克·库班支持的FiscalNote将通过13亿美元的SPAC交易上市</blockquote>
MERV
2021-11-05
Like pls
Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买:迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>
MERV
2021-11-05
Like pls thanks
U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021<blockquote>美国夏令时将于2021年11月7日星期日结束</blockquote>
MERV
2021-11-04
Like please thanks
5 Stocks To Watch For November 4, 2021<blockquote>2021年11月4日值得关注的5只股票</blockquote>
MERV
2021-11-03
Like and comment thanks
抱歉,原内容已删除
MERV
2021-11-01
Like pls thanks
Federal Reserve decision, October jobs report: What to know this week<blockquote>美联储决定、十月就业报告:本周需要了解什么</blockquote>
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3579171701347900","uuid":"3579171701347900","gmtCreate":1616077677374,"gmtModify":1620018453786,"name":"MERV","pinyin":"merv","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"OK","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":24,"headSize":2,"tweetSize":7,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖(非转发)","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.02","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":878948056,"gmtCreate":1637142480976,"gmtModify":1637142483853,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls ty","listText":"Like pls ty","text":"Like pls ty","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/878948056","repostId":"1121662992","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121662992","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1637141997,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121662992?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-17 17:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Square vs. Afterpay<blockquote>更好的选择:Square与Afterpay</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121662992","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Square is acquiring Afterpay. Is that a great deal, or was it a mistake?","content":"<p><b>Square</b>(NYSE:SQ), the company that brought <b>Bitcoin</b> to the masses and is revolutionizing the whole banking sector, surprised a lot of Fools when it made a deal to buy <b>Afterpay</b>(OTC:AFTP.F), the Australian creator of the \"buy now, pay later\" (BNPL) space that has taken the world by storm. Afterpay has upended the whole notion of credit by making it free (if you pay on time).</p><p><blockquote><b>平方</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:SQ),该公司带来了<b>比特币</b>并正在彻底改变整个银行业,当它达成收购交易时,让许多傻瓜感到惊讶<b>Afterpay</b>(场外交易代码:AFTP.F),风靡全球的“先买后付”(BNPL)空间的澳大利亚创造者。Afterpay使其免费(如果您按时付款),颠覆了整个信贷概念。</blockquote></p><p> Some Fools were unhappy that Square bought the unprofitable-but-fast-growing Australian superstar, arguing that CEO Jack Dorsey paid too much. Nonetheless, Dorsey has been right over and over again in the fintech space, so the criticisms of this merger weren't too loud. Still, some people might wish the union would fall apart. If it did, which company would you rather own?</p><p><blockquote>一些傻瓜对Square收购这位尚未盈利但发展迅速的澳大利亚巨星感到不满,认为首席执行官杰克·多西支付的费用太高。尽管如此,多尔西在金融科技领域一次又一次地说对了,所以对这次合并的批评并不是太大。尽管如此,有些人可能希望工会分崩离析。如果是的话,你更愿意拥有哪家公司?</blockquote></p><p> Fool contributor Anders Bylund says Square would be his choice, while Fool writer Taylor Carmichael opts for Afterpay. And here's why we think this way.</p><p><blockquote>Fool撰稿人Anders Bylund表示Square将是他的选择,而Fool作家Taylor Carmichael则选择Afterpay。这就是我们这样想的原因。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/59fdacdf33b923f349ae38588b04f176\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is obviously the safer way into this future merger</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square显然是未来合并的更安全方式</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Anders Bylund(Square shares, please):</b>I'll concede that the Afterpay merger looks extremely likely to succeed. Every merger faces some challenges, but the arguments against this transaction have been muttered, not shouted. The regulatory approvals are continuing apace, and Square's shareholders approved the buyout with an overwhelming 99.8% of shareholder votes being cast in favor of the deal. The hurdles in front of the final approval are falling one by one, and the last John Hancock should be in place early next year.</p><p><blockquote><b>Anders Bylund(请分享Square股份):</b>我承认Afterpay合并看起来极有可能成功。每一次合并都面临一些挑战,但反对这笔交易的论据一直在喃喃自语,而不是大声疾呼。监管部门的批准仍在快速进行,Square的股东以压倒性的99.8%的股东投票批准了此次收购。最终批准面前的障碍正在一个接一个地落下,最后一个约翰·汉考克应该会在明年初到位。</blockquote></p><p> And there isn't much room for arbitrage here, either. Afterpay shares currently trade at 36.9% of Square's stock price, which is just a hair below the proposed stock-swap offer of 0.375 Square stubs for each Afterpay share. This ratio has been stable since Day One:</p><p><blockquote>而且这里也没有太大的套利空间。Afterpay股票目前的交易价格为Square股价的36.9%,仅略低于每股Afterpay股票0.375 Square stubs的拟议股票交换报价。该比率自第一天起一直保持稳定:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadb1031cd47e47b7b1758c53da2edd1\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>SQ DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的SQ数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Still, nothing is absolutely guaranteed until the ink is dry on the final paperwork. This is especially true for mergers going across national borders. For example, American semiconductor giant <b>Qualcomm</b>(NASDAQ:QCOM) was just one step or two away from completing its proposed $44 billion buyout of <b>NXP Semiconductors</b>(NASDAQ:NXPI) in 2018, until geopolitical concernsstopped that deal in its tracks. If this could happen to Qualcomm and NXP, it could happen to Square and Afterpay as well.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此,在最终文件上的墨水干了之前,没有什么是绝对保证的。对于跨国合并来说尤其如此。比如美国半导体巨头<b>Qualcomm</b>(纳斯达克:QCOM)距离完成其440亿美元收购的提议仅一两步之遥<b>恩智浦半导体</b>(纳斯达克:NXPI)2018年,直到地缘政治担忧阻止了该交易。如果这种情况可能发生在高通和恩智浦身上,那么它也可能发生在Square和Afterpay身上。</blockquote></p><p> On that note, there's a small chance that it actually matters whether you're buying Afterpay or Square shares today. If the deal falls apart for some reason, the American financial technology company looks like the safer stock to hold for the long haul. Both companies are growing their revenues at similar speeds, but Square is also an effective cash machine while Afterpay consistently reports negative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- and the cash is only burning faster over time:</p><p><blockquote>在这一点上,您今天购买Afterpay还是Square股票实际上很有可能很重要。如果交易因某种原因失败,这家美国金融科技公司看起来是长期持有的更安全的股票。两家公司的收入增长速度相似,但Square也是一台有效的提款机,而Afterpay的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)一直为负,而且随着时间的推移,现金只会燃烧得更快:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf20f5aa51051163c88a319a0fc117b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF EBITDA (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS. TTM = TRAILING-12-MONTHS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF EBITDA(TTM)数据。TTM=过去12个月。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> So this discussion is largely academic, but Square offers the better entry into the proposed merger just in case something goes wrong at the last minute.</p><p><blockquote>因此,这种讨论很大程度上是学术性的,但Square为拟议的合并提供了更好的入口,以防在最后一刻出现问题。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is marrying up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square要结婚了</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Taylor Carmichael(Afterpay):</b>I'm extremely bullish on Square, and I think Jack Dorsey is a genius. So it's pretty much impossible for me to be negative on Square. On the other hand, I'm probably the biggest fan of Afterpay at the Motley Fool. So let me speak on why Square was so willing to pay up for Afterpay, and why you want to own that Australian powerhouse if these two companies end up in divorce court (heaven forbid!)</p><p><blockquote><b>泰勒·卡迈克尔(后付费):</b>我非常看好Square,我认为Jack Dorsey是个天才。所以我几乎不可能对Square持否定态度。另一方面,我可能是Motley Fool Afterpay的最大粉丝。所以让我来谈谈为什么Square如此愿意支付Afterpay,以及如果这两家公司最终上了离婚法庭(但愿不会如此!)</blockquote></p><p> Afterpay is top dog and first mover in the BNPL space. If you don't know what that is, it'sinterest-free credit. Retailers happily pay for Afterpay's service, because it makes their revenues spike way higher.<b>Affirm</b>(NASDAQ:AFRM) and <b>PayPal</b>(NASDAQ:PYPL) are both copycats in this space. And Afterpay is still way ahead. For instance, on PayPal's recent earnings report, the company reported that it had processed $5.4 billion in total product volume (TPV) since the launch of the service a year ago. Afterpay dwarfs that number, reporting $22.4 billion in underlying sales.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay是BNPL领域的领头羊和先行者。如果你不知道那是什么,那就是无息信贷。零售商很乐意为Afterpay的服务付费,因为这使他们的收入飙升。<b>申明</b>(纳斯达克:AFRM)和<b>PayPal</b>(纳斯达克:PYPL)都是这个领域的模仿者。Afterpay仍然遥遥领先。例如,在PayPal最近的收益报告中,该公司报告称,自一年前推出该服务以来,它已处理了54亿美元的产品总量(TPV)。Afterpay的基本销售额为224亿美元,令这个数字相形见绌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Of course, competing with PayPal is a bit scary, as the American juggernaut has a massive network in place. Nonetheless, Afterpay invented the BNPL space, and it's Afterpay that is revolutionizing consumer debt around the world. Ultimately, credit cards are doomed, at least in retail. And it's Afterpay that is killing that sector.</p><p><blockquote>当然,与PayPal竞争有点可怕,因为美国巨头拥有庞大的网络。尽管如此,Afterpay发明了BNPL领域,正是Afterpay正在彻底改变世界各地的消费者债务。最终,信用卡注定要失败,至少在零售业是这样。正是Afterpay正在扼杀这个行业。</blockquote></p><p> One of the ways Afterpay is winning is by providing its service in brick-and-mortar retailers. Indeed, that's why the Australian company is such a good match for Square, since both companies are going after real-world market opportunities, not just internet commerce. So while PayPal and Affirm are seeing some internet tailwinds because of the lockdown, Afterpay absolutely crushed expectations in spite of the lockdown.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay获胜的方式之一是在实体零售商中提供服务。事实上,这就是为什么这家澳大利亚公司与Square如此匹配,因为两家公司都在追求现实世界的市场机会,而不仅仅是互联网商务。因此,虽然PayPal和Affirm因封锁而看到了一些互联网顺风车,但尽管有封锁,Afterpay绝对超出了预期。</blockquote></p><p> The other thing that's amazing about Afterpay is that it sees itself as a consumer brand first and foremost. So, for instance, Sept. 9-12 is designated \"Afterpay Day,\" when the company offers killer deals to all its subscribers across its whole universe of retailers.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay的另一个令人惊讶的地方是,它首先将自己视为一个消费品牌。因此,例如,9月9日至12日被指定为“后付费日”,该公司向其整个零售商领域的所有订户提供杀手级交易。</blockquote></p><p> All this success makes Afterpay a stronger stock. Don't believe me? Check out the stock charts. Let's compare Afterpay stock with the two titans of fintech, PayPal and Square.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些成功使Afterpay成为一只更强大的股票。不相信我?查看股票图表。让我们将Afterpay股票与金融科技两大巨头PayPal和Square进行比较。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffadef41cf18514f905fe65e0e26d42f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> It's not even close. And mind you, we're looking at the American Depository Receipts (ADR), trading here since 2018. Afterpay was an insane stock in the Australian markets for a full year before its ADR showed up.</p><p><blockquote>差远了。请注意,我们正在关注自2018年以来在这里交易的美国存托凭证(ADR)。在ADR出现之前,Afterpay在澳大利亚市场上整整一年都是一只疯狂的股票。</blockquote></p><p> If you have two amazing companies that are taking over the world, as an investor you usually want to be in the smaller one. As dynamic and wonderful as Square has been, Afterpay has been a significantly stronger stock for shareholders over the last several years.</p><p><blockquote>如果你有两家了不起的公司正在接管世界,作为投资者,你通常希望投资较小的公司。尽管Square充满活力且精彩,但Afterpay在过去几年中对股东来说一直是一只明显更强劲的股票。</blockquote></p><p> It's a happy union for sure. Nonetheless, if you dig into the numbers, you can see why Square paid so much for Afterpay.</p><p><blockquote>这肯定是一个幸福的结合。尽管如此,如果你深入研究这些数字,你就会明白为什么Square为Afterpay支付了如此多的费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Square vs. Afterpay<blockquote>更好的选择:Square与Afterpay</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Square vs. Afterpay<blockquote>更好的选择:Square与Afterpay</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-17 17:39</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Square</b>(NYSE:SQ), the company that brought <b>Bitcoin</b> to the masses and is revolutionizing the whole banking sector, surprised a lot of Fools when it made a deal to buy <b>Afterpay</b>(OTC:AFTP.F), the Australian creator of the \"buy now, pay later\" (BNPL) space that has taken the world by storm. Afterpay has upended the whole notion of credit by making it free (if you pay on time).</p><p><blockquote><b>平方</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:SQ),该公司带来了<b>比特币</b>并正在彻底改变整个银行业,当它达成收购交易时,让许多傻瓜感到惊讶<b>Afterpay</b>(场外交易代码:AFTP.F),风靡全球的“先买后付”(BNPL)空间的澳大利亚创造者。Afterpay使其免费(如果您按时付款),颠覆了整个信贷概念。</blockquote></p><p> Some Fools were unhappy that Square bought the unprofitable-but-fast-growing Australian superstar, arguing that CEO Jack Dorsey paid too much. Nonetheless, Dorsey has been right over and over again in the fintech space, so the criticisms of this merger weren't too loud. Still, some people might wish the union would fall apart. If it did, which company would you rather own?</p><p><blockquote>一些傻瓜对Square收购这位尚未盈利但发展迅速的澳大利亚巨星感到不满,认为首席执行官杰克·多西支付的费用太高。尽管如此,多尔西在金融科技领域一次又一次地说对了,所以对这次合并的批评并不是太大。尽管如此,有些人可能希望工会分崩离析。如果是的话,你更愿意拥有哪家公司?</blockquote></p><p> Fool contributor Anders Bylund says Square would be his choice, while Fool writer Taylor Carmichael opts for Afterpay. And here's why we think this way.</p><p><blockquote>Fool撰稿人Anders Bylund表示Square将是他的选择,而Fool作家Taylor Carmichael则选择Afterpay。这就是我们这样想的原因。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/59fdacdf33b923f349ae38588b04f176\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is obviously the safer way into this future merger</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square显然是未来合并的更安全方式</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Anders Bylund(Square shares, please):</b>I'll concede that the Afterpay merger looks extremely likely to succeed. Every merger faces some challenges, but the arguments against this transaction have been muttered, not shouted. The regulatory approvals are continuing apace, and Square's shareholders approved the buyout with an overwhelming 99.8% of shareholder votes being cast in favor of the deal. The hurdles in front of the final approval are falling one by one, and the last John Hancock should be in place early next year.</p><p><blockquote><b>Anders Bylund(请分享Square股份):</b>我承认Afterpay合并看起来极有可能成功。每一次合并都面临一些挑战,但反对这笔交易的论据一直在喃喃自语,而不是大声疾呼。监管部门的批准仍在快速进行,Square的股东以压倒性的99.8%的股东投票批准了此次收购。最终批准面前的障碍正在一个接一个地落下,最后一个约翰·汉考克应该会在明年初到位。</blockquote></p><p> And there isn't much room for arbitrage here, either. Afterpay shares currently trade at 36.9% of Square's stock price, which is just a hair below the proposed stock-swap offer of 0.375 Square stubs for each Afterpay share. This ratio has been stable since Day One:</p><p><blockquote>而且这里也没有太大的套利空间。Afterpay股票目前的交易价格为Square股价的36.9%,仅略低于每股Afterpay股票0.375 Square stubs的拟议股票交换报价。该比率自第一天起一直保持稳定:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadb1031cd47e47b7b1758c53da2edd1\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>SQ DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的SQ数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Still, nothing is absolutely guaranteed until the ink is dry on the final paperwork. This is especially true for mergers going across national borders. For example, American semiconductor giant <b>Qualcomm</b>(NASDAQ:QCOM) was just one step or two away from completing its proposed $44 billion buyout of <b>NXP Semiconductors</b>(NASDAQ:NXPI) in 2018, until geopolitical concernsstopped that deal in its tracks. If this could happen to Qualcomm and NXP, it could happen to Square and Afterpay as well.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此,在最终文件上的墨水干了之前,没有什么是绝对保证的。对于跨国合并来说尤其如此。比如美国半导体巨头<b>Qualcomm</b>(纳斯达克:QCOM)距离完成其440亿美元收购的提议仅一两步之遥<b>恩智浦半导体</b>(纳斯达克:NXPI)2018年,直到地缘政治担忧阻止了该交易。如果这种情况可能发生在高通和恩智浦身上,那么它也可能发生在Square和Afterpay身上。</blockquote></p><p> On that note, there's a small chance that it actually matters whether you're buying Afterpay or Square shares today. If the deal falls apart for some reason, the American financial technology company looks like the safer stock to hold for the long haul. Both companies are growing their revenues at similar speeds, but Square is also an effective cash machine while Afterpay consistently reports negative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- and the cash is only burning faster over time:</p><p><blockquote>在这一点上,您今天购买Afterpay还是Square股票实际上很有可能很重要。如果交易因某种原因失败,这家美国金融科技公司看起来是长期持有的更安全的股票。两家公司的收入增长速度相似,但Square也是一台有效的提款机,而Afterpay的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)一直为负,而且随着时间的推移,现金只会燃烧得更快:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf20f5aa51051163c88a319a0fc117b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF EBITDA (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS. TTM = TRAILING-12-MONTHS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF EBITDA(TTM)数据。TTM=过去12个月。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> So this discussion is largely academic, but Square offers the better entry into the proposed merger just in case something goes wrong at the last minute.</p><p><blockquote>因此,这种讨论很大程度上是学术性的,但Square为拟议的合并提供了更好的入口,以防在最后一刻出现问题。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is marrying up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square要结婚了</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Taylor Carmichael(Afterpay):</b>I'm extremely bullish on Square, and I think Jack Dorsey is a genius. So it's pretty much impossible for me to be negative on Square. On the other hand, I'm probably the biggest fan of Afterpay at the Motley Fool. So let me speak on why Square was so willing to pay up for Afterpay, and why you want to own that Australian powerhouse if these two companies end up in divorce court (heaven forbid!)</p><p><blockquote><b>泰勒·卡迈克尔(后付费):</b>我非常看好Square,我认为Jack Dorsey是个天才。所以我几乎不可能对Square持否定态度。另一方面,我可能是Motley Fool Afterpay的最大粉丝。所以让我来谈谈为什么Square如此愿意支付Afterpay,以及如果这两家公司最终上了离婚法庭(但愿不会如此!)</blockquote></p><p> Afterpay is top dog and first mover in the BNPL space. If you don't know what that is, it'sinterest-free credit. Retailers happily pay for Afterpay's service, because it makes their revenues spike way higher.<b>Affirm</b>(NASDAQ:AFRM) and <b>PayPal</b>(NASDAQ:PYPL) are both copycats in this space. And Afterpay is still way ahead. For instance, on PayPal's recent earnings report, the company reported that it had processed $5.4 billion in total product volume (TPV) since the launch of the service a year ago. Afterpay dwarfs that number, reporting $22.4 billion in underlying sales.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay是BNPL领域的领头羊和先行者。如果你不知道那是什么,那就是无息信贷。零售商很乐意为Afterpay的服务付费,因为这使他们的收入飙升。<b>申明</b>(纳斯达克:AFRM)和<b>PayPal</b>(纳斯达克:PYPL)都是这个领域的模仿者。Afterpay仍然遥遥领先。例如,在PayPal最近的收益报告中,该公司报告称,自一年前推出该服务以来,它已处理了54亿美元的产品总量(TPV)。Afterpay的基本销售额为224亿美元,令这个数字相形见绌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Of course, competing with PayPal is a bit scary, as the American juggernaut has a massive network in place. Nonetheless, Afterpay invented the BNPL space, and it's Afterpay that is revolutionizing consumer debt around the world. Ultimately, credit cards are doomed, at least in retail. And it's Afterpay that is killing that sector.</p><p><blockquote>当然,与PayPal竞争有点可怕,因为美国巨头拥有庞大的网络。尽管如此,Afterpay发明了BNPL领域,正是Afterpay正在彻底改变世界各地的消费者债务。最终,信用卡注定要失败,至少在零售业是这样。正是Afterpay正在扼杀这个行业。</blockquote></p><p> One of the ways Afterpay is winning is by providing its service in brick-and-mortar retailers. Indeed, that's why the Australian company is such a good match for Square, since both companies are going after real-world market opportunities, not just internet commerce. So while PayPal and Affirm are seeing some internet tailwinds because of the lockdown, Afterpay absolutely crushed expectations in spite of the lockdown.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay获胜的方式之一是在实体零售商中提供服务。事实上,这就是为什么这家澳大利亚公司与Square如此匹配,因为两家公司都在追求现实世界的市场机会,而不仅仅是互联网商务。因此,虽然PayPal和Affirm因封锁而看到了一些互联网顺风车,但尽管有封锁,Afterpay绝对超出了预期。</blockquote></p><p> The other thing that's amazing about Afterpay is that it sees itself as a consumer brand first and foremost. So, for instance, Sept. 9-12 is designated \"Afterpay Day,\" when the company offers killer deals to all its subscribers across its whole universe of retailers.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay的另一个令人惊讶的地方是,它首先将自己视为一个消费品牌。因此,例如,9月9日至12日被指定为“后付费日”,该公司向其整个零售商领域的所有订户提供杀手级交易。</blockquote></p><p> All this success makes Afterpay a stronger stock. Don't believe me? Check out the stock charts. Let's compare Afterpay stock with the two titans of fintech, PayPal and Square.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些成功使Afterpay成为一只更强大的股票。不相信我?查看股票图表。让我们将Afterpay股票与金融科技两大巨头PayPal和Square进行比较。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffadef41cf18514f905fe65e0e26d42f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> It's not even close. And mind you, we're looking at the American Depository Receipts (ADR), trading here since 2018. Afterpay was an insane stock in the Australian markets for a full year before its ADR showed up.</p><p><blockquote>差远了。请注意,我们正在关注自2018年以来在这里交易的美国存托凭证(ADR)。在ADR出现之前,Afterpay在澳大利亚市场上整整一年都是一只疯狂的股票。</blockquote></p><p> If you have two amazing companies that are taking over the world, as an investor you usually want to be in the smaller one. As dynamic and wonderful as Square has been, Afterpay has been a significantly stronger stock for shareholders over the last several years.</p><p><blockquote>如果你有两家了不起的公司正在接管世界,作为投资者,你通常希望投资较小的公司。尽管Square充满活力且精彩,但Afterpay在过去几年中对股东来说一直是一只明显更强劲的股票。</blockquote></p><p> It's a happy union for sure. Nonetheless, if you dig into the numbers, you can see why Square paid so much for Afterpay.</p><p><blockquote>这肯定是一个幸福的结合。尽管如此,如果你深入研究这些数字,你就会明白为什么Square为Afterpay支付了如此多的费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/16/better-buy-square-vs-afterpay/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/16/better-buy-square-vs-afterpay/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121662992","content_text":"Square(NYSE:SQ), the company that brought Bitcoin to the masses and is revolutionizing the whole banking sector, surprised a lot of Fools when it made a deal to buy Afterpay(OTC:AFTP.F), the Australian creator of the \"buy now, pay later\" (BNPL) space that has taken the world by storm. Afterpay has upended the whole notion of credit by making it free (if you pay on time).\nSome Fools were unhappy that Square bought the unprofitable-but-fast-growing Australian superstar, arguing that CEO Jack Dorsey paid too much. Nonetheless, Dorsey has been right over and over again in the fintech space, so the criticisms of this merger weren't too loud. Still, some people might wish the union would fall apart. If it did, which company would you rather own?\nFool contributor Anders Bylund says Square would be his choice, while Fool writer Taylor Carmichael opts for Afterpay. And here's why we think this way.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nSquare is obviously the safer way into this future merger\nAnders Bylund(Square shares, please):I'll concede that the Afterpay merger looks extremely likely to succeed. Every merger faces some challenges, but the arguments against this transaction have been muttered, not shouted. The regulatory approvals are continuing apace, and Square's shareholders approved the buyout with an overwhelming 99.8% of shareholder votes being cast in favor of the deal. The hurdles in front of the final approval are falling one by one, and the last John Hancock should be in place early next year.\nAnd there isn't much room for arbitrage here, either. Afterpay shares currently trade at 36.9% of Square's stock price, which is just a hair below the proposed stock-swap offer of 0.375 Square stubs for each Afterpay share. This ratio has been stable since Day One:\nSQ DATA BY YCHARTS\nStill, nothing is absolutely guaranteed until the ink is dry on the final paperwork. This is especially true for mergers going across national borders. For example, American semiconductor giant Qualcomm(NASDAQ:QCOM) was just one step or two away from completing its proposed $44 billion buyout of NXP Semiconductors(NASDAQ:NXPI) in 2018, until geopolitical concernsstopped that deal in its tracks. If this could happen to Qualcomm and NXP, it could happen to Square and Afterpay as well.\nOn that note, there's a small chance that it actually matters whether you're buying Afterpay or Square shares today. If the deal falls apart for some reason, the American financial technology company looks like the safer stock to hold for the long haul. Both companies are growing their revenues at similar speeds, but Square is also an effective cash machine while Afterpay consistently reports negative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- and the cash is only burning faster over time:\nAFTPF EBITDA (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS. TTM = TRAILING-12-MONTHS.\nSo this discussion is largely academic, but Square offers the better entry into the proposed merger just in case something goes wrong at the last minute.\nSquare is marrying up\nTaylor Carmichael(Afterpay):I'm extremely bullish on Square, and I think Jack Dorsey is a genius. So it's pretty much impossible for me to be negative on Square. On the other hand, I'm probably the biggest fan of Afterpay at the Motley Fool. So let me speak on why Square was so willing to pay up for Afterpay, and why you want to own that Australian powerhouse if these two companies end up in divorce court (heaven forbid!)\nAfterpay is top dog and first mover in the BNPL space. If you don't know what that is, it'sinterest-free credit. Retailers happily pay for Afterpay's service, because it makes their revenues spike way higher.Affirm(NASDAQ:AFRM) and PayPal(NASDAQ:PYPL) are both copycats in this space. And Afterpay is still way ahead. For instance, on PayPal's recent earnings report, the company reported that it had processed $5.4 billion in total product volume (TPV) since the launch of the service a year ago. Afterpay dwarfs that number, reporting $22.4 billion in underlying sales.\nOf course, competing with PayPal is a bit scary, as the American juggernaut has a massive network in place. Nonetheless, Afterpay invented the BNPL space, and it's Afterpay that is revolutionizing consumer debt around the world. Ultimately, credit cards are doomed, at least in retail. And it's Afterpay that is killing that sector.\nOne of the ways Afterpay is winning is by providing its service in brick-and-mortar retailers. Indeed, that's why the Australian company is such a good match for Square, since both companies are going after real-world market opportunities, not just internet commerce. So while PayPal and Affirm are seeing some internet tailwinds because of the lockdown, Afterpay absolutely crushed expectations in spite of the lockdown.\nThe other thing that's amazing about Afterpay is that it sees itself as a consumer brand first and foremost. So, for instance, Sept. 9-12 is designated \"Afterpay Day,\" when the company offers killer deals to all its subscribers across its whole universe of retailers.\nAll this success makes Afterpay a stronger stock. Don't believe me? Check out the stock charts. Let's compare Afterpay stock with the two titans of fintech, PayPal and Square.\nAFTPF DATA BY YCHARTS\nIt's not even close. And mind you, we're looking at the American Depository Receipts (ADR), trading here since 2018. Afterpay was an insane stock in the Australian markets for a full year before its ADR showed up.\nIf you have two amazing companies that are taking over the world, as an investor you usually want to be in the smaller one. As dynamic and wonderful as Square has been, Afterpay has been a significantly stronger stock for shareholders over the last several years.\nIt's a happy union for sure. Nonetheless, if you dig into the numbers, you can see why Square paid so much for Afterpay.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SQ":0.9,"AFTPF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2335,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":844002112,"gmtCreate":1636374461574,"gmtModify":1636374461983,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/844002112","repostId":"1163389936","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163389936","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636373562,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1163389936?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 20:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Mark Cuban-backed FiscalNote to go public via $1.3 billion SPAC deal<blockquote>马克·库班支持的FiscalNote将通过13亿美元的SPAC交易上市</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163389936","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on M","content":"<p>(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on Monday it would merge with a blank-check firm to go public in a deal valuing it at about $1.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>(路透社)-马克·库班支持的法律数据和分析公司FiscalNote Holdings Inc周一表示,将与一家空白支票公司合并上市,交易估值约为13亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2013, the company offers a platform that gives its customers such as Nestle, Netflix and Tesla access and analysis on every U.S. government bill.</p><p><blockquote>该公司成立于2013年,提供了一个平台,让雀巢、Netflix和特斯拉等客户能够访问和分析每一份美国政府账单。</blockquote></p><p> The company uses artificial intelligence to make government data more accessible and also tracks regulatory developments in the European Union.</p><p><blockquote>该公司使用人工智能使政府数据更容易访问,并跟踪欧盟的监管发展。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote’s deal with Duddell Street Acquisition Corp will provide it with proceeds of $275 million, consisting of a $100 million private placement in public equity and about $175 million from the special purpose acquisition company’s (SPAC) IPO.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote与Duddell Street Acquisition Corp的交易将为其提供2.75亿美元的收益,其中包括1亿美元的公共股权私募和来自特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)IPO的约1.75亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote, which is also backed by billionaire venture capitalist and Yahoo Inc co-founder Jerry Yang, intends to use the proceeds to expand its product offering and fund acquisitions.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote还得到了亿万富翁风险投资家和雅虎公司联合创始人杨致远的支持,打算利用所得款项扩大其产品供应并为收购提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> A SPAC is a publicly listed shell company that raises funds with the intention of merging with a private company within two years of floating its shares. The private firm goes public through the merger.</p><p><blockquote>SPAC是一家公开上市的空壳公司,其筹集资金的目的是在其股票上市后两年内与私营公司合并。这家私营公司通过合并上市。</blockquote></p><p> After the deal closes in the first quarter of 2022, FiscalNote will list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “NOTE”.</p><p><blockquote>2022年第一季度交易完成后,FiscalNote将在纳斯达克上市,股票代码为“NOTE”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Mark Cuban-backed FiscalNote to go public via $1.3 billion SPAC deal<blockquote>马克·库班支持的FiscalNote将通过13亿美元的SPAC交易上市</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMark Cuban-backed FiscalNote to go public via $1.3 billion SPAC deal<blockquote>马克·库班支持的FiscalNote将通过13亿美元的SPAC交易上市</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-08 20:12</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on Monday it would merge with a blank-check firm to go public in a deal valuing it at about $1.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>(路透社)-马克·库班支持的法律数据和分析公司FiscalNote Holdings Inc周一表示,将与一家空白支票公司合并上市,交易估值约为13亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2013, the company offers a platform that gives its customers such as Nestle, Netflix and Tesla access and analysis on every U.S. government bill.</p><p><blockquote>该公司成立于2013年,提供了一个平台,让雀巢、Netflix和特斯拉等客户能够访问和分析每一份美国政府账单。</blockquote></p><p> The company uses artificial intelligence to make government data more accessible and also tracks regulatory developments in the European Union.</p><p><blockquote>该公司使用人工智能使政府数据更容易访问,并跟踪欧盟的监管发展。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote’s deal with Duddell Street Acquisition Corp will provide it with proceeds of $275 million, consisting of a $100 million private placement in public equity and about $175 million from the special purpose acquisition company’s (SPAC) IPO.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote与Duddell Street Acquisition Corp的交易将为其提供2.75亿美元的收益,其中包括1亿美元的公共股权私募和来自特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)IPO的约1.75亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote, which is also backed by billionaire venture capitalist and Yahoo Inc co-founder Jerry Yang, intends to use the proceeds to expand its product offering and fund acquisitions.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote还得到了亿万富翁风险投资家和雅虎公司联合创始人杨致远的支持,打算利用所得款项扩大其产品供应并为收购提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> A SPAC is a publicly listed shell company that raises funds with the intention of merging with a private company within two years of floating its shares. The private firm goes public through the merger.</p><p><blockquote>SPAC是一家公开上市的空壳公司,其筹集资金的目的是在其股票上市后两年内与私营公司合并。这家私营公司通过合并上市。</blockquote></p><p> After the deal closes in the first quarter of 2022, FiscalNote will list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “NOTE”.</p><p><blockquote>2022年第一季度交易完成后,FiscalNote将在纳斯达克上市,股票代码为“NOTE”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/fiscalnote-ma-duddell-street-acquisition/-mark-cuban-backed-fiscalnote-to-go-public-via-1-3-bln-spac-deal-idUSL4N2RZ2I5\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/fiscalnote-ma-duddell-street-acquisition/-mark-cuban-backed-fiscalnote-to-go-public-via-1-3-bln-spac-deal-idUSL4N2RZ2I5","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163389936","content_text":"(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on Monday it would merge with a blank-check firm to go public in a deal valuing it at about $1.3 billion.\nFounded in 2013, the company offers a platform that gives its customers such as Nestle, Netflix and Tesla access and analysis on every U.S. government bill.\nThe company uses artificial intelligence to make government data more accessible and also tracks regulatory developments in the European Union.\nFiscalNote’s deal with Duddell Street Acquisition Corp will provide it with proceeds of $275 million, consisting of a $100 million private placement in public equity and about $175 million from the special purpose acquisition company’s (SPAC) IPO.\nFiscalNote, which is also backed by billionaire venture capitalist and Yahoo Inc co-founder Jerry Yang, intends to use the proceeds to expand its product offering and fund acquisitions.\nA SPAC is a publicly listed shell company that raises funds with the intention of merging with a private company within two years of floating its shares. The private firm goes public through the merger.\nAfter the deal closes in the first quarter of 2022, FiscalNote will list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “NOTE”.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DSAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3795,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":842029276,"gmtCreate":1636121392830,"gmtModify":1636121399445,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842029276","repostId":"1156284404","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156284404","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636121042,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1156284404?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 22:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买:迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156284404","media":"Motley Fool ","summary":"Both have strong brands, but one gets the nod.","content":"<p>It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.</p><p><blockquote>在两家优质公司之间总是很难做出选择。理想情况下,你可能想两者都买。然而,投资往往归结为把你的血汗钱放在哪里。</blockquote></p><p> That's the case with <b>Walt Disney</b> and <b>Starbucks</b>. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the <b>S&P 500</b> has risen by 24% during that time.</p><p><blockquote>情况就是这样<b>迪斯尼</b>和<b>星巴克</b>两只股票都经历了充满挑战的2021年。迪士尼股价下跌6%,星巴克股价下跌5%。这是作为<b>标普500</b>在此期间上涨了24%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92d7cd6a38784299fa1cce99ae01a4cd\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> However, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?</p><p><blockquote>然而,两者都为投资者提供了坚实的长期增长前景。问题是:目前哪一项是更好的投资?</blockquote></p><p> <b>Starbucks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星巴克</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from higher costs that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.</p><p><blockquote>投资者显然不喜欢星巴克最新的季度收益报告。10月底发布后,该股下跌6%,至106美元左右。这个问题源于成本上升,这可能会继续影响近期盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> In the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.</p><p><blockquote>最近一个季度,星巴克在美国的营业利润率。公认会计原则(GAAP)增长了一倍多,达到18.2%。但管理层预计明年的利润率为17%,这主要是由于工资上涨。虽然这低于18%至19%的长期目标,但我相信这将是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> That's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.</p><p><blockquote>这是因为星巴克继续保持强劲的销售增长。这将有助于公司提高价格并利用费用。</blockquote></p><p> Starbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,</p><p><blockquote>受新餐厅开业和同店销售额增长17%的推动,星巴克季度营收增长31%至81亿美元。管理层预计2022财年的销售额将实现高个位数百分比增长,并将开设2,000家餐厅,其中大部分在美国境外。预计这些将带来325亿至330亿美元的收入,</blockquote></p><p> In short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之,对星巴克产品的需求在疫情期间因商店关闭而暂停,但仍然强劲。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>迪斯尼</b></blockquote></p><p> Disney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.</p><p><blockquote>由于担心其流媒体服务Disney+增长放缓,迪士尼股价今年下跌。由于它在疫情期间突飞猛进,我并不担心。</blockquote></p><p> After all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟,截至2021年7月初,Disney+的付费用户为1.16亿,而4月份为1.036亿。这也是一年前5750万的两倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.</p><p><blockquote>虽然Disney+可能没有过去的超音速增长,但它仍在以不错的速度增加订户。更重要的是,迪士尼不仅仅是一个流媒体服务。其庞大的媒体帝国包括公园、电影、几个电视网络和零售店。</blockquote></p><p> This helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.</p><p><blockquote>这有助于公司取得强劲的业绩,即使业务的一部分放缓。例如,今年帮助其ESPN网络的体育直播回归,主题公园重新开放。其季度收入同比增长45%,达到170亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> With popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.</p><p><blockquote>凭借受欢迎的媒体资产,如漫威角色和电影的稳定,迪士尼的未来看起来一片光明。这是因为它拥有高度认可和备受推崇的品牌,这些品牌已经证明了它们的持久力。管理层加强了其地位,包括几年前收购了二十一世纪福克斯公司,该公司增加了电视网络、漫威角色,并提供了流媒体服务Hulu的控股权。</blockquote></p><p> After examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.</p><p><blockquote>考察了两家公司后,两家公司都有吸引很多人的强大品牌。对我来说,优势在于星巴克,因为它自2010年以来增加了股息,包括在大流行期间。很高兴收到收入,这是管理层和董事会对未来有信心的积极迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Unfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.</p><p><blockquote>不幸的是,迪士尼去年暂停了股息。虽然考虑到疫情造成的不确定性,这当然是可以理解的,但这确实给星巴克带来了帮助,星巴克认为增加支付是合适的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买:迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买:迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool </strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-05 22:04</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.</p><p><blockquote>在两家优质公司之间总是很难做出选择。理想情况下,你可能想两者都买。然而,投资往往归结为把你的血汗钱放在哪里。</blockquote></p><p> That's the case with <b>Walt Disney</b> and <b>Starbucks</b>. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the <b>S&P 500</b> has risen by 24% during that time.</p><p><blockquote>情况就是这样<b>迪斯尼</b>和<b>星巴克</b>两只股票都经历了充满挑战的2021年。迪士尼股价下跌6%,星巴克股价下跌5%。这是作为<b>标普500</b>在此期间上涨了24%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92d7cd6a38784299fa1cce99ae01a4cd\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> However, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?</p><p><blockquote>然而,两者都为投资者提供了坚实的长期增长前景。问题是:目前哪一项是更好的投资?</blockquote></p><p> <b>Starbucks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星巴克</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from higher costs that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.</p><p><blockquote>投资者显然不喜欢星巴克最新的季度收益报告。10月底发布后,该股下跌6%,至106美元左右。这个问题源于成本上升,这可能会继续影响近期盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> In the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.</p><p><blockquote>最近一个季度,星巴克在美国的营业利润率。公认会计原则(GAAP)增长了一倍多,达到18.2%。但管理层预计明年的利润率为17%,这主要是由于工资上涨。虽然这低于18%至19%的长期目标,但我相信这将是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> That's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.</p><p><blockquote>这是因为星巴克继续保持强劲的销售增长。这将有助于公司提高价格并利用费用。</blockquote></p><p> Starbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,</p><p><blockquote>受新餐厅开业和同店销售额增长17%的推动,星巴克季度营收增长31%至81亿美元。管理层预计2022财年的销售额将实现高个位数百分比增长,并将开设2,000家餐厅,其中大部分在美国境外。预计这些将带来325亿至330亿美元的收入,</blockquote></p><p> In short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之,对星巴克产品的需求在疫情期间因商店关闭而暂停,但仍然强劲。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>迪斯尼</b></blockquote></p><p> Disney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.</p><p><blockquote>由于担心其流媒体服务Disney+增长放缓,迪士尼股价今年下跌。由于它在疫情期间突飞猛进,我并不担心。</blockquote></p><p> After all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟,截至2021年7月初,Disney+的付费用户为1.16亿,而4月份为1.036亿。这也是一年前5750万的两倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.</p><p><blockquote>虽然Disney+可能没有过去的超音速增长,但它仍在以不错的速度增加订户。更重要的是,迪士尼不仅仅是一个流媒体服务。其庞大的媒体帝国包括公园、电影、几个电视网络和零售店。</blockquote></p><p> This helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.</p><p><blockquote>这有助于公司取得强劲的业绩,即使业务的一部分放缓。例如,今年帮助其ESPN网络的体育直播回归,主题公园重新开放。其季度收入同比增长45%,达到170亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> With popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.</p><p><blockquote>凭借受欢迎的媒体资产,如漫威角色和电影的稳定,迪士尼的未来看起来一片光明。这是因为它拥有高度认可和备受推崇的品牌,这些品牌已经证明了它们的持久力。管理层加强了其地位,包括几年前收购了二十一世纪福克斯公司,该公司增加了电视网络、漫威角色,并提供了流媒体服务Hulu的控股权。</blockquote></p><p> After examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.</p><p><blockquote>考察了两家公司后,两家公司都有吸引很多人的强大品牌。对我来说,优势在于星巴克,因为它自2010年以来增加了股息,包括在大流行期间。很高兴收到收入,这是管理层和董事会对未来有信心的积极迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Unfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.</p><p><blockquote>不幸的是,迪士尼去年暂停了股息。虽然考虑到疫情造成的不确定性,这当然是可以理解的,但这确实给星巴克带来了帮助,星巴克认为增加支付是合适的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/better-buy-disney-vs-starbucks/\">Motley Fool </a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SBUX":"星巴克","DIS":"迪士尼"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/better-buy-disney-vs-starbucks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156284404","content_text":"It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.\nThat's the case with Walt Disney and Starbucks. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the S&P 500 has risen by 24% during that time.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nHowever, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?\nStarbucks\nInvestors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from higher costs that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.\nIn the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.\nThat's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.\nStarbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,\nIn short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.\nWalt Disney\nDisney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.\nAfter all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.\nWhile it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.\nThis helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.\nWith popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.\nAfter examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.\nUnfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SBUX":0.9,"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2522,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":842029045,"gmtCreate":1636121355381,"gmtModify":1636121364787,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls thanks","listText":"Like pls thanks","text":"Like pls thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842029045","repostId":"1136116425","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136116425","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1636104081,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1136116425?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 17:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021<blockquote>美国夏令时将于2021年11月7日星期日结束</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136116425","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.\nAt that time,the regu","content":"<p>Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.</p><p><blockquote>亲爱的老虎们,美国夏令时于2021年11月7日周日凌晨2点结束。</blockquote></p><p> At that time,the regular trading period of the US stock market will move toward by one hour, which will become 22:30 p.m.to 5:00 a.m(Beijing Time/SGT). </p><p><blockquote>届时,美股常规交易时段将提前一小时,即北京时间下午22:30至凌晨5:00。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e441a1a98d5230fc31d6f1652e577bde\" tg-width=\"674\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Hours</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易时间</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:9:30 ~ 16:00; Beijing time /SGT :22:30 ~ 5:00 the next day</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:9:30~16:00;北京时间/SGT:22:30~次日5:00</blockquote></p><p> <b>pre-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易前</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:4:00 ~ 9:30;Beijing time/SGT :17:00 ~ 22:30</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:4:00~9:30;北京时间/SGT:17:00~22:30</blockquote></p><p> <b>post-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易后</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:16:00~20:00;Beijing time/SGT:5:00 ~ 9:00</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:16:00~20:00;北京时间/SGT:5:00~9:00</blockquote></p><p> (Note: Daylight saving time always begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November)</p><p><blockquote>(注:夏令时总是从三月的第二个星期日开始,到十一月的第一个星期日结束)</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021<blockquote>美国夏令时将于2021年11月7日星期日结束</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021<blockquote>美国夏令时将于2021年11月7日星期日结束</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-11-05 17:21</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.</p><p><blockquote>亲爱的老虎们,美国夏令时于2021年11月7日周日凌晨2点结束。</blockquote></p><p> At that time,the regular trading period of the US stock market will move toward by one hour, which will become 22:30 p.m.to 5:00 a.m(Beijing Time/SGT). </p><p><blockquote>届时,美股常规交易时段将提前一小时,即北京时间下午22:30至凌晨5:00。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e441a1a98d5230fc31d6f1652e577bde\" tg-width=\"674\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Hours</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易时间</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:9:30 ~ 16:00; Beijing time /SGT :22:30 ~ 5:00 the next day</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:9:30~16:00;北京时间/SGT:22:30~次日5:00</blockquote></p><p> <b>pre-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易前</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:4:00 ~ 9:30;Beijing time/SGT :17:00 ~ 22:30</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:4:00~9:30;北京时间/SGT:17:00~22:30</blockquote></p><p> <b>post-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易后</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:16:00~20:00;Beijing time/SGT:5:00 ~ 9:00</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:16:00~20:00;北京时间/SGT:5:00~9:00</blockquote></p><p> (Note: Daylight saving time always begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November)</p><p><blockquote>(注:夏令时总是从三月的第二个星期日开始,到十一月的第一个星期日结束)</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136116425","content_text":"Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.\nAt that time,the regular trading period of the US stock market will move toward by one hour, which will become 22:30 p.m.to 5:00 a.m(Beijing Time/SGT). \n\nTrading Hours\nU.S. Eastern Time:9:30 ~ 16:00; Beijing time /SGT :22:30 ~ 5:00 the next day\npre-trade\nU.S. Eastern Time:4:00 ~ 9:30;Beijing time/SGT :17:00 ~ 22:30\npost-trade\nU.S. Eastern Time:16:00~20:00;Beijing time/SGT:5:00 ~ 9:00\n(Note: Daylight saving time always begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3258,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":848462983,"gmtCreate":1636020869452,"gmtModify":1636020869896,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please thanks","listText":"Like please thanks","text":"Like please thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/848462983","repostId":"1189037300","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189037300","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1636018960,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1189037300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-04 17:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Stocks To Watch For November 4, 2021<blockquote>2021年11月4日值得关注的5只股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189037300","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:\n\nWall Street expects Moderna, Inc. to rep","content":"<p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p><blockquote>今天可能引起投资者关注的一些股票包括:</blockquote></p><p> <ul> <li>Wall Street expects <b>Moderna, Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $8.95 per share on revenue of $6.45 billion before the opening bell. Moderna shares rose 0.2% to $346.66 in pre-market trading.</li> <li><b>Booking Holdings Inc.</b> reported upbeat earnings for the third quarter. Booking shares gained 4.3% to $2,540.00 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts are expecting <b>ViacomCBS Inc.</b> to have earned $0.76 per share on revenue of $6.60 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. ViacomCBS shares rose 0.7% to 37.80 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul> <ul> <li><b>Qualcomm Inc</b> posted upbeat results for its recent quarter and issued a strong forecast for its current quarter. Qualcomm shares climbed 6.7% to $147.80 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts expect <b>Airbnb, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $2.04 billion after the closing bell. Airbnb shares rose 2.2% to 176.64 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>华尔街预计<b>莫德纳公司。</b>开盘前公布季度收益为每股8.95美元,营收为64.5亿美元。Moderna股价在盘前交易中上涨0.2%,至346.66美元。</li><li><b>预订控股公司。</b>报告了乐观的第三季度收益。Booking股价在盘前交易时段上涨4.3%,至2,540.00美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>维亚康姆哥伦比亚广播公司。</b>最近一个季度的营收为66亿美元,每股收益为0.76美元。该公司将在开市前发布财报。ViacomCBS股价在盘前交易中上涨0.7%,至37.80点。</li></ul><ul><li><b>高通公司</b>公布了最近一个季度的乐观业绩,并发布了对本季度的强劲预测。高通股价在盘前交易时段上涨6.7%至147.80美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>爱彼迎公司。</b>收盘后公布季度收益为每股0.84美元,营收为20.4亿美元。爱彼迎股价在盘前交易中上涨2.2%至176.64点。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Stocks To Watch For November 4, 2021<blockquote>2021年11月4日值得关注的5只股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Stocks To Watch For November 4, 2021<blockquote>2021年11月4日值得关注的5只股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-11-04 17:42</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p><blockquote>今天可能引起投资者关注的一些股票包括:</blockquote></p><p> <ul> <li>Wall Street expects <b>Moderna, Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $8.95 per share on revenue of $6.45 billion before the opening bell. Moderna shares rose 0.2% to $346.66 in pre-market trading.</li> <li><b>Booking Holdings Inc.</b> reported upbeat earnings for the third quarter. Booking shares gained 4.3% to $2,540.00 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts are expecting <b>ViacomCBS Inc.</b> to have earned $0.76 per share on revenue of $6.60 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. ViacomCBS shares rose 0.7% to 37.80 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul> <ul> <li><b>Qualcomm Inc</b> posted upbeat results for its recent quarter and issued a strong forecast for its current quarter. Qualcomm shares climbed 6.7% to $147.80 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts expect <b>Airbnb, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $2.04 billion after the closing bell. Airbnb shares rose 2.2% to 176.64 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>华尔街预计<b>莫德纳公司。</b>开盘前公布季度收益为每股8.95美元,营收为64.5亿美元。Moderna股价在盘前交易中上涨0.2%,至346.66美元。</li><li><b>预订控股公司。</b>报告了乐观的第三季度收益。Booking股价在盘前交易时段上涨4.3%,至2,540.00美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>维亚康姆哥伦比亚广播公司。</b>最近一个季度的营收为66亿美元,每股收益为0.76美元。该公司将在开市前发布财报。ViacomCBS股价在盘前交易中上涨0.7%,至37.80点。</li></ul><ul><li><b>高通公司</b>公布了最近一个季度的乐观业绩,并发布了对本季度的强劲预测。高通股价在盘前交易时段上涨6.7%至147.80美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>爱彼迎公司。</b>收盘后公布季度收益为每股0.84美元,营收为20.4亿美元。爱彼迎股价在盘前交易中上涨2.2%至176.64点。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ABNB":"爱彼迎","QCOM":"高通","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","BKNG":"Booking Holdings"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189037300","content_text":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:\n\nWall Street expects Moderna, Inc. to report quarterly earnings at $8.95 per share on revenue of $6.45 billion before the opening bell. Moderna shares rose 0.2% to $346.66 in pre-market trading.\nBooking Holdings Inc. reported upbeat earnings for the third quarter. Booking shares gained 4.3% to $2,540.00 in the pre-market trading session.\nAnalysts are expecting ViacomCBS Inc. to have earned $0.76 per share on revenue of $6.60 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. ViacomCBS shares rose 0.7% to 37.80 in pre-market trading.\n\n\nQualcomm Inc posted upbeat results for its recent quarter and issued a strong forecast for its current quarter. Qualcomm shares climbed 6.7% to $147.80 in the pre-market trading session.\nAnalysts expect Airbnb, Inc. to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $2.04 billion after the closing bell. Airbnb shares rose 2.2% to 176.64 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QCOM":0.9,"ABNB":0.9,"MRNA":0.9,"VIAC":0.9,"BKNG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3629,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":841443160,"gmtCreate":1635937932421,"gmtModify":1635937932892,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment thanks","listText":"Like and comment thanks","text":"Like and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/841443160","repostId":"1127735959","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3909,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":849425149,"gmtCreate":1635774590297,"gmtModify":1635774590510,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls thanks","listText":"Like pls thanks","text":"Like pls thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/849425149","repostId":"2179250221","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2179250221","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635721559,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2179250221?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-01 07:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Federal Reserve decision, October jobs report: What to know this week<blockquote>美联储决定、十月就业报告:本周需要了解什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2179250221","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set th","content":"<p><div> The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set the stage for a long-awaited announcement of asset-purchase tapering. Meanwhile, traders will also ...</p><p><blockquote><div>美联储即将召开的货币政策会议将成为本周的焦点,并可能为期待已久的资产购买缩减公告奠定基础。与此同时,交易者也将...</div></blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页链接</a> </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Federal Reserve decision, October jobs report: What to know this week<blockquote>美联储决定、十月就业报告:本周需要了解什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFederal Reserve decision, October jobs report: What to know this week<blockquote>美联储决定、十月就业报告:本周需要了解什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Yahoo Finance</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-01 07:05</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set the stage for a long-awaited announcement of asset-purchase tapering. Meanwhile, traders will also ...</p><p><blockquote><div>美联储即将召开的货币政策会议将成为本周的焦点,并可能为期待已久的资产购买缩减公告奠定基础。与此同时,交易者也将...</div></blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页链接</a> </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">Yahoo Finance</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","ATVI":"动视暴雪","APO":"阿波罗全球管理","EL":"雅诗兰黛","BLMN":"Bloomin' Brands","PFE":"辉瑞",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","UBER":"优步","RL":"拉夫劳伦","CLX":"高乐氏","COP":"康菲石油","CRSR":"Corsair Gaming, Inc."},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2179250221","content_text":"The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set the stage for a long-awaited announcement of asset-purchase tapering. Meanwhile, traders will also await more data on the U.S. economic recovery with the Labor Department's monthly jobs report later this week.\nThe Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) November meeting will take place from Tuesday to Wednesday, with the policy statement and press conference from the meeting serving as the central bank's penultimate opportunity this year to announce formal plans to begin rolling back its crisis-era quantitative easing program. For the past year-and-a-half, the central bank has been purchasing $120 billion per month in agency mortgage-backed securities and Treasuries, as one major tool to support the economy during the pandemic.\nIn late September, the FOMC's latest monetary policy statement and press conference from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell suggested the central bank was apt to announce the start of tapering before year-end, and continue the tapering process until \"around the middle of next year.\"\n\"The upcoming FOMC meeting will be important for three reasons: 1) the announcement of tapering; 2) guidance around what tapering means for the path of hikes; and 3) nuanced changes in views around inflation risks given recent data,\" wrote Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer in a note.\n\"The statement that announces the new pace of asset purchases will be followed by a note regarding flexibility stating that asset purchases are not on a pre-set course and will depend on the outlook for the labor market and inflation as well as an assessment of the efficacy of asset purchases,\" she predicted.\nShe noted that Powell may also use the press conference to reiterate that the end of tapering would not necessarily indicate the start of rate hikes, and that both policy actions are distinct. In previous public remarks, Powell has already made a similar point in previous public remarks, saying, \"the timing and pace of the coming reduction in asset purchases will not be intended to carry a direct signal regarding the timing of interest rate liftoff.\"\nGiven the market has been anticipating the start to tapering for months now, speculation around when the Fed will make a move on interest rates has become a point of particular interest to investors. Investors and economists have mulled whether the Fed may need to act more quickly than previously telegraphed on adjusting interest rates to stave off inflation, which has proven more long-lasting than some had suggested.\nWASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 24: Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell testifies during a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on September 24, 2020 in Washington, DC. Powell and U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin are testifying about the CARES Act and the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)Drew Angerer via Getty Images\nIn September, core personal consumption expenditures — the Fed's preferred gauge of underlying inflation — rose 3.6% over last year for a fourth consecutive month, coming in at the fastest clip since 1991. And earlier this month, Powell acknowledged in public remarks that the supply chain constraints and shortages that spurred the latest rise in prices are \"likely to last longer than previously expected, likely well into next year.\"\nWhile the central bank will not release an updated Summary of Economic Projections with their policy statement on Wednesday, the latest projections from the September meeting suggested the committee was split on rate hikes for 2022, with nine members seeing no rate hikes by the end of next year while the other nine members saw at least one hike.\n\"I think the Fed has pretty well determined to start the taper pretty quickly. We expect them to announce it next week and then start it soon thereafter, so that's pretty well carved in stone,\" Kathy Jones, Charles Schwab chief fixed income strategist, told Yahoo Finance Live last week. \"I think the big debate now is how quickly the Fed moves toward actually raising rates. The expectation in the market has really shifted to expecting as many as two rate hikes in 2022 and 2023 ... that’s a pretty aggressive pace of tightening.\"\nOctober jobs report\nOne of this week's most closely watched pieces of economic data will be the October jobs report, which is due for release on Friday from the Labor Department.\nEconomists are looking to see a pick-up in the pace of hiring for October after a disappointing print in September, when just 194,000 non-farm payrolls returned versus the half million expected. Over the past two months, payroll gains averaged at just 280,000. The unemployment rate is expected to take another small step toward pre-pandemic levels in October as well, with the jobless rate anticipated to dip to 4.7% from 4.8% the prior month.\nStill, the labor market has still fallen short its pre-pandemic conditions on a number of fronts. The unemployment rate has yet to return to its 50-year low of 3.5% from February 2020. And as of September, the civilian labor force was still down by about 3.1 million individuals from pre-virus levels.\nOne factor weighing on the labor market in August and September was the Delta variant, which may have deterred some workers from seeking employment in person for risk of infection. And an ongoing element dragging on the labor market's recovery has been a mismatch of supply and demand, with employers struggling to fill a near-record number of job openings while voluntary quits jumped to a historically high level.\n\"Next week’s October payrolls report will shed light on whether supply eased on diminishing constraints or if the labor market continues to face headwinds for now,\" wrote Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist for High Frequency Economics, in a note last week.\nBut some data from the past couple weeks has reflected favorably on conditions in the labor market in October. Weekly new unemployment claims broke below 300,000 for the first time since the start of the pandemic during the survey week for the October jobs report, or the week that includes the 12th of the month. And in the Conference Board's October Consumer Confidence Index, just 10.6% of consumers said jobs were \"hard to get,\" down from 13.0% in September. That brought the Conference Board's closely watched labor market differential, or percentage of consumers saying jobs are \"hard to get\" subtracted from the percentage saying jobs \"are plentiful,\" to 45, or its highest level since 2000.\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Markit U.S. Manufacturing PMI, Oct. final (59.3 expected, 59.2 in September); Constructing spending, month-over-month, September (0.4% expected, 0.0% in August); ISM Manufacturing Index, Oct. (60.5 expected, 61.1 in September)\nTuesday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nWednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Oct. 29 (0.3% during prior week); ADP Employment Change, Oct. (400,000 expected, 568,000 in September); ISM Services Index, October (62.0 expected, 61.9 in September); Factory Orders, September (-0.1% expected, 1.2% in August); Durable goods orders, September final (-0.4% in prior print; Durable goods orders excluding transportation, September final (0.4% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, September final (0.8% in prior print); Markit U.S. Services PMI, October final (58.2 expected, 58.2 in prior print); Markit U.S. Composite PMI, October final (57.3 in prior print); Federal Open Market Committee monetary policy decision\nThursday: Challenger job cuts, year-over-year, October (-84.9% in September); Initial jobless claims, week ended Oct. 30 (275,000 expected, 281,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Oct. 23 (2.147 million expected, 2.243 million during prior week); Non-farm productivity, Q3 preliminary (-3.2% expected, 2.1% in Q2); Unit Labor Costs, Q3 preliminary (6.9% expected, 1.3% in Q2); Trade balance, September (-$80.1 billion expected, -$73.3 billion in August)\nFriday: Change in non-farm payrolls, October (450,000 expected, 194,000 in September); Unemployment rate, October (4.7% expected, 4.8% in September); Average hourly earnings, month-over-month, October (4.7% expected, 4.8% in September); Average hourly earnings, year-over-year, October (4.9% expected, 4.6% in September); Labor Force Participation Rate, October (61.8% expected, 61.6% in September); Consumer Credit, September ($16.200 billion expected, $14.379 million in August)\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: Clorox (CLX), Avis Budget Group (CAR), ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI), Chegg Inc. (CHGG), Diamondback Energy (FANG), The Simon Property Group (SPG) after market close\nTuesday: Under Armour (UAA), Estee Lauder (EL), Ralph Lauren (RL), Apollo Global Management (APO), Corsair Gaming (CRSR), Bloomin' Brands (BLMN), ConocoPhillips (COP), Pfizer (PFE), Groupon (GPN), Marathon Petroleum (MPC) before market open; Mondelez (MDLZ), T-Mobile (TMUS), Akamai (AKAM), Activision Blizzard (ATVI), Lyft (LYFT), Match Group (MTCH), Devon Energy (DVN), Chesapeake Energy (CHK), Coursera (COUR), Zillow Group (ZG), Amgen (AMGN) after market close\nWednesday: Humana (HUM), Discovery Inc. (DISCA), The New York Times (NYT), Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH), Marriott International (MAR), CVS Health Corp. (CVS), Sinclair Broadcast Group (SBGI) before market open; Booking Holdings (BKNG), Qorvo (QRVO), The Allstate Corp. (ALL), MGM Resorts International (MGM), $Take-Two Interactive Software(TTWO)$ (TTWO), Electronic Arts (EA), Vimeo (VMEO), Etsy (ETSY), GoDaddy (GDDY), Marathon Oil Corp. (MRO), Roku (ROKU), Qualcomm (QCOM) after market close\nThursday: Cigna (CI), Wayfair (W), ViacomCBS (VIAC), Nikola (NKLA), Duke Energy (DUK), Citrix Systems (CTXS), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN), Hanesbrands (HBI), Moderna (MRNA), Planet Fitness (PLNT), Vulcan Material (VMC), Kellogg (K), Square (SQ), Cloudflare (NET), Occidental Petroleum (OXY), Uber Technologies (UBER), American International Group (AIG), Shake Shack (SHAK), iHeartMedia (IHRT), Novavax (NVAX), IAC Interactive Corp. (IAC), Peloton (PTON), Dropbox (DBX), DataDog (DDOG), Pinterest (PINS), Skyworks Solutions (SWKS), Expedia (EXPE), Rocket Cos. (RKT), Live Nation Entertainment (LYV), Airbnb (ABNB)\nFriday: Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Dish Networks (DISH), Dominion Energy (D), DraftKings (DKNG), Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT), Cinemark Holdings (CNK) before market open","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"PFE":0.9,"CLX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"CRSR":0.9,"UBER":0.9,"ATVI":0.9,"EL":0.9,"RL":0.9,"COP":0.9,"APO":0.9,"BLMN":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":842029045,"gmtCreate":1636121355381,"gmtModify":1636121364787,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls thanks","listText":"Like pls thanks","text":"Like pls thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842029045","repostId":"1136116425","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136116425","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1636104081,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1136116425?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 17:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021<blockquote>美国夏令时将于2021年11月7日星期日结束</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136116425","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.\nAt that time,the regu","content":"<p>Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.</p><p><blockquote>亲爱的老虎们,美国夏令时于2021年11月7日周日凌晨2点结束。</blockquote></p><p> At that time,the regular trading period of the US stock market will move toward by one hour, which will become 22:30 p.m.to 5:00 a.m(Beijing Time/SGT). </p><p><blockquote>届时,美股常规交易时段将提前一小时,即北京时间下午22:30至凌晨5:00。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e441a1a98d5230fc31d6f1652e577bde\" tg-width=\"674\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Hours</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易时间</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:9:30 ~ 16:00; Beijing time /SGT :22:30 ~ 5:00 the next day</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:9:30~16:00;北京时间/SGT:22:30~次日5:00</blockquote></p><p> <b>pre-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易前</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:4:00 ~ 9:30;Beijing time/SGT :17:00 ~ 22:30</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:4:00~9:30;北京时间/SGT:17:00~22:30</blockquote></p><p> <b>post-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易后</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:16:00~20:00;Beijing time/SGT:5:00 ~ 9:00</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:16:00~20:00;北京时间/SGT:5:00~9:00</blockquote></p><p> (Note: Daylight saving time always begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November)</p><p><blockquote>(注:夏令时总是从三月的第二个星期日开始,到十一月的第一个星期日结束)</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021<blockquote>美国夏令时将于2021年11月7日星期日结束</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021<blockquote>美国夏令时将于2021年11月7日星期日结束</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-11-05 17:21</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.</p><p><blockquote>亲爱的老虎们,美国夏令时于2021年11月7日周日凌晨2点结束。</blockquote></p><p> At that time,the regular trading period of the US stock market will move toward by one hour, which will become 22:30 p.m.to 5:00 a.m(Beijing Time/SGT). </p><p><blockquote>届时,美股常规交易时段将提前一小时,即北京时间下午22:30至凌晨5:00。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e441a1a98d5230fc31d6f1652e577bde\" tg-width=\"674\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Hours</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易时间</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:9:30 ~ 16:00; Beijing time /SGT :22:30 ~ 5:00 the next day</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:9:30~16:00;北京时间/SGT:22:30~次日5:00</blockquote></p><p> <b>pre-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易前</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:4:00 ~ 9:30;Beijing time/SGT :17:00 ~ 22:30</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:4:00~9:30;北京时间/SGT:17:00~22:30</blockquote></p><p> <b>post-trade</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易后</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. Eastern Time:16:00~20:00;Beijing time/SGT:5:00 ~ 9:00</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间:16:00~20:00;北京时间/SGT:5:00~9:00</blockquote></p><p> (Note: Daylight saving time always begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November)</p><p><blockquote>(注:夏令时总是从三月的第二个星期日开始,到十一月的第一个星期日结束)</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136116425","content_text":"Dear Tigers, U.S. Daylight Saving Time Ends on Sunday, Nov.7 2021,at 2:00 a.m.\nAt that time,the regular trading period of the US stock market will move toward by one hour, which will become 22:30 p.m.to 5:00 a.m(Beijing Time/SGT). \n\nTrading Hours\nU.S. Eastern Time:9:30 ~ 16:00; Beijing time /SGT :22:30 ~ 5:00 the next day\npre-trade\nU.S. Eastern Time:4:00 ~ 9:30;Beijing time/SGT :17:00 ~ 22:30\npost-trade\nU.S. Eastern Time:16:00~20:00;Beijing time/SGT:5:00 ~ 9:00\n(Note: Daylight saving time always begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3258,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":841443160,"gmtCreate":1635937932421,"gmtModify":1635937932892,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment thanks","listText":"Like and comment thanks","text":"Like and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/841443160","repostId":"1127735959","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3909,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":848462983,"gmtCreate":1636020869452,"gmtModify":1636020869896,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please thanks","listText":"Like please thanks","text":"Like please thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/848462983","repostId":"1189037300","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189037300","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1636018960,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1189037300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-04 17:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Stocks To Watch For November 4, 2021<blockquote>2021年11月4日值得关注的5只股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189037300","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:\n\nWall Street expects Moderna, Inc. to rep","content":"<p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p><blockquote>今天可能引起投资者关注的一些股票包括:</blockquote></p><p> <ul> <li>Wall Street expects <b>Moderna, Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $8.95 per share on revenue of $6.45 billion before the opening bell. Moderna shares rose 0.2% to $346.66 in pre-market trading.</li> <li><b>Booking Holdings Inc.</b> reported upbeat earnings for the third quarter. Booking shares gained 4.3% to $2,540.00 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts are expecting <b>ViacomCBS Inc.</b> to have earned $0.76 per share on revenue of $6.60 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. ViacomCBS shares rose 0.7% to 37.80 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul> <ul> <li><b>Qualcomm Inc</b> posted upbeat results for its recent quarter and issued a strong forecast for its current quarter. Qualcomm shares climbed 6.7% to $147.80 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts expect <b>Airbnb, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $2.04 billion after the closing bell. Airbnb shares rose 2.2% to 176.64 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>华尔街预计<b>莫德纳公司。</b>开盘前公布季度收益为每股8.95美元,营收为64.5亿美元。Moderna股价在盘前交易中上涨0.2%,至346.66美元。</li><li><b>预订控股公司。</b>报告了乐观的第三季度收益。Booking股价在盘前交易时段上涨4.3%,至2,540.00美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>维亚康姆哥伦比亚广播公司。</b>最近一个季度的营收为66亿美元,每股收益为0.76美元。该公司将在开市前发布财报。ViacomCBS股价在盘前交易中上涨0.7%,至37.80点。</li></ul><ul><li><b>高通公司</b>公布了最近一个季度的乐观业绩,并发布了对本季度的强劲预测。高通股价在盘前交易时段上涨6.7%至147.80美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>爱彼迎公司。</b>收盘后公布季度收益为每股0.84美元,营收为20.4亿美元。爱彼迎股价在盘前交易中上涨2.2%至176.64点。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Stocks To Watch For November 4, 2021<blockquote>2021年11月4日值得关注的5只股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Stocks To Watch For November 4, 2021<blockquote>2021年11月4日值得关注的5只股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-11-04 17:42</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p><blockquote>今天可能引起投资者关注的一些股票包括:</blockquote></p><p> <ul> <li>Wall Street expects <b>Moderna, Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $8.95 per share on revenue of $6.45 billion before the opening bell. Moderna shares rose 0.2% to $346.66 in pre-market trading.</li> <li><b>Booking Holdings Inc.</b> reported upbeat earnings for the third quarter. Booking shares gained 4.3% to $2,540.00 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts are expecting <b>ViacomCBS Inc.</b> to have earned $0.76 per share on revenue of $6.60 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. ViacomCBS shares rose 0.7% to 37.80 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul> <ul> <li><b>Qualcomm Inc</b> posted upbeat results for its recent quarter and issued a strong forecast for its current quarter. Qualcomm shares climbed 6.7% to $147.80 in the pre-market trading session.</li> <li>Analysts expect <b>Airbnb, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $2.04 billion after the closing bell. Airbnb shares rose 2.2% to 176.64 in pre-market trading.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>华尔街预计<b>莫德纳公司。</b>开盘前公布季度收益为每股8.95美元,营收为64.5亿美元。Moderna股价在盘前交易中上涨0.2%,至346.66美元。</li><li><b>预订控股公司。</b>报告了乐观的第三季度收益。Booking股价在盘前交易时段上涨4.3%,至2,540.00美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>维亚康姆哥伦比亚广播公司。</b>最近一个季度的营收为66亿美元,每股收益为0.76美元。该公司将在开市前发布财报。ViacomCBS股价在盘前交易中上涨0.7%,至37.80点。</li></ul><ul><li><b>高通公司</b>公布了最近一个季度的乐观业绩,并发布了对本季度的强劲预测。高通股价在盘前交易时段上涨6.7%至147.80美元。</li><li>分析师预计<b>爱彼迎公司。</b>收盘后公布季度收益为每股0.84美元,营收为20.4亿美元。爱彼迎股价在盘前交易中上涨2.2%至176.64点。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ABNB":"爱彼迎","QCOM":"高通","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","BKNG":"Booking Holdings"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189037300","content_text":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:\n\nWall Street expects Moderna, Inc. to report quarterly earnings at $8.95 per share on revenue of $6.45 billion before the opening bell. Moderna shares rose 0.2% to $346.66 in pre-market trading.\nBooking Holdings Inc. reported upbeat earnings for the third quarter. Booking shares gained 4.3% to $2,540.00 in the pre-market trading session.\nAnalysts are expecting ViacomCBS Inc. to have earned $0.76 per share on revenue of $6.60 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. ViacomCBS shares rose 0.7% to 37.80 in pre-market trading.\n\n\nQualcomm Inc posted upbeat results for its recent quarter and issued a strong forecast for its current quarter. Qualcomm shares climbed 6.7% to $147.80 in the pre-market trading session.\nAnalysts expect Airbnb, Inc. to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $2.04 billion after the closing bell. Airbnb shares rose 2.2% to 176.64 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QCOM":0.9,"ABNB":0.9,"MRNA":0.9,"VIAC":0.9,"BKNG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3629,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":844002112,"gmtCreate":1636374461574,"gmtModify":1636374461983,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/844002112","repostId":"1163389936","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163389936","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636373562,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1163389936?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 20:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Mark Cuban-backed FiscalNote to go public via $1.3 billion SPAC deal<blockquote>马克·库班支持的FiscalNote将通过13亿美元的SPAC交易上市</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163389936","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on M","content":"<p>(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on Monday it would merge with a blank-check firm to go public in a deal valuing it at about $1.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>(路透社)-马克·库班支持的法律数据和分析公司FiscalNote Holdings Inc周一表示,将与一家空白支票公司合并上市,交易估值约为13亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2013, the company offers a platform that gives its customers such as Nestle, Netflix and Tesla access and analysis on every U.S. government bill.</p><p><blockquote>该公司成立于2013年,提供了一个平台,让雀巢、Netflix和特斯拉等客户能够访问和分析每一份美国政府账单。</blockquote></p><p> The company uses artificial intelligence to make government data more accessible and also tracks regulatory developments in the European Union.</p><p><blockquote>该公司使用人工智能使政府数据更容易访问,并跟踪欧盟的监管发展。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote’s deal with Duddell Street Acquisition Corp will provide it with proceeds of $275 million, consisting of a $100 million private placement in public equity and about $175 million from the special purpose acquisition company’s (SPAC) IPO.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote与Duddell Street Acquisition Corp的交易将为其提供2.75亿美元的收益,其中包括1亿美元的公共股权私募和来自特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)IPO的约1.75亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote, which is also backed by billionaire venture capitalist and Yahoo Inc co-founder Jerry Yang, intends to use the proceeds to expand its product offering and fund acquisitions.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote还得到了亿万富翁风险投资家和雅虎公司联合创始人杨致远的支持,打算利用所得款项扩大其产品供应并为收购提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> A SPAC is a publicly listed shell company that raises funds with the intention of merging with a private company within two years of floating its shares. The private firm goes public through the merger.</p><p><blockquote>SPAC是一家公开上市的空壳公司,其筹集资金的目的是在其股票上市后两年内与私营公司合并。这家私营公司通过合并上市。</blockquote></p><p> After the deal closes in the first quarter of 2022, FiscalNote will list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “NOTE”.</p><p><blockquote>2022年第一季度交易完成后,FiscalNote将在纳斯达克上市,股票代码为“NOTE”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Mark Cuban-backed FiscalNote to go public via $1.3 billion SPAC deal<blockquote>马克·库班支持的FiscalNote将通过13亿美元的SPAC交易上市</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMark Cuban-backed FiscalNote to go public via $1.3 billion SPAC deal<blockquote>马克·库班支持的FiscalNote将通过13亿美元的SPAC交易上市</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-08 20:12</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on Monday it would merge with a blank-check firm to go public in a deal valuing it at about $1.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>(路透社)-马克·库班支持的法律数据和分析公司FiscalNote Holdings Inc周一表示,将与一家空白支票公司合并上市,交易估值约为13亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2013, the company offers a platform that gives its customers such as Nestle, Netflix and Tesla access and analysis on every U.S. government bill.</p><p><blockquote>该公司成立于2013年,提供了一个平台,让雀巢、Netflix和特斯拉等客户能够访问和分析每一份美国政府账单。</blockquote></p><p> The company uses artificial intelligence to make government data more accessible and also tracks regulatory developments in the European Union.</p><p><blockquote>该公司使用人工智能使政府数据更容易访问,并跟踪欧盟的监管发展。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote’s deal with Duddell Street Acquisition Corp will provide it with proceeds of $275 million, consisting of a $100 million private placement in public equity and about $175 million from the special purpose acquisition company’s (SPAC) IPO.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote与Duddell Street Acquisition Corp的交易将为其提供2.75亿美元的收益,其中包括1亿美元的公共股权私募和来自特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)IPO的约1.75亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FiscalNote, which is also backed by billionaire venture capitalist and Yahoo Inc co-founder Jerry Yang, intends to use the proceeds to expand its product offering and fund acquisitions.</p><p><blockquote>FiscalNote还得到了亿万富翁风险投资家和雅虎公司联合创始人杨致远的支持,打算利用所得款项扩大其产品供应并为收购提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> A SPAC is a publicly listed shell company that raises funds with the intention of merging with a private company within two years of floating its shares. The private firm goes public through the merger.</p><p><blockquote>SPAC是一家公开上市的空壳公司,其筹集资金的目的是在其股票上市后两年内与私营公司合并。这家私营公司通过合并上市。</blockquote></p><p> After the deal closes in the first quarter of 2022, FiscalNote will list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “NOTE”.</p><p><blockquote>2022年第一季度交易完成后,FiscalNote将在纳斯达克上市,股票代码为“NOTE”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/fiscalnote-ma-duddell-street-acquisition/-mark-cuban-backed-fiscalnote-to-go-public-via-1-3-bln-spac-deal-idUSL4N2RZ2I5\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/fiscalnote-ma-duddell-street-acquisition/-mark-cuban-backed-fiscalnote-to-go-public-via-1-3-bln-spac-deal-idUSL4N2RZ2I5","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163389936","content_text":"(Reuters) - FiscalNote Holdings Inc, a Mark Cuban-backed legal data and analytics company, said on Monday it would merge with a blank-check firm to go public in a deal valuing it at about $1.3 billion.\nFounded in 2013, the company offers a platform that gives its customers such as Nestle, Netflix and Tesla access and analysis on every U.S. government bill.\nThe company uses artificial intelligence to make government data more accessible and also tracks regulatory developments in the European Union.\nFiscalNote’s deal with Duddell Street Acquisition Corp will provide it with proceeds of $275 million, consisting of a $100 million private placement in public equity and about $175 million from the special purpose acquisition company’s (SPAC) IPO.\nFiscalNote, which is also backed by billionaire venture capitalist and Yahoo Inc co-founder Jerry Yang, intends to use the proceeds to expand its product offering and fund acquisitions.\nA SPAC is a publicly listed shell company that raises funds with the intention of merging with a private company within two years of floating its shares. The private firm goes public through the merger.\nAfter the deal closes in the first quarter of 2022, FiscalNote will list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “NOTE”.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DSAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3795,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":878948056,"gmtCreate":1637142480976,"gmtModify":1637142483853,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls ty","listText":"Like pls ty","text":"Like pls ty","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/878948056","repostId":"1121662992","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121662992","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1637141997,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121662992?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-17 17:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Square vs. Afterpay<blockquote>更好的选择:Square与Afterpay</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121662992","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Square is acquiring Afterpay. Is that a great deal, or was it a mistake?","content":"<p><b>Square</b>(NYSE:SQ), the company that brought <b>Bitcoin</b> to the masses and is revolutionizing the whole banking sector, surprised a lot of Fools when it made a deal to buy <b>Afterpay</b>(OTC:AFTP.F), the Australian creator of the \"buy now, pay later\" (BNPL) space that has taken the world by storm. Afterpay has upended the whole notion of credit by making it free (if you pay on time).</p><p><blockquote><b>平方</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:SQ),该公司带来了<b>比特币</b>并正在彻底改变整个银行业,当它达成收购交易时,让许多傻瓜感到惊讶<b>Afterpay</b>(场外交易代码:AFTP.F),风靡全球的“先买后付”(BNPL)空间的澳大利亚创造者。Afterpay使其免费(如果您按时付款),颠覆了整个信贷概念。</blockquote></p><p> Some Fools were unhappy that Square bought the unprofitable-but-fast-growing Australian superstar, arguing that CEO Jack Dorsey paid too much. Nonetheless, Dorsey has been right over and over again in the fintech space, so the criticisms of this merger weren't too loud. Still, some people might wish the union would fall apart. If it did, which company would you rather own?</p><p><blockquote>一些傻瓜对Square收购这位尚未盈利但发展迅速的澳大利亚巨星感到不满,认为首席执行官杰克·多西支付的费用太高。尽管如此,多尔西在金融科技领域一次又一次地说对了,所以对这次合并的批评并不是太大。尽管如此,有些人可能希望工会分崩离析。如果是的话,你更愿意拥有哪家公司?</blockquote></p><p> Fool contributor Anders Bylund says Square would be his choice, while Fool writer Taylor Carmichael opts for Afterpay. And here's why we think this way.</p><p><blockquote>Fool撰稿人Anders Bylund表示Square将是他的选择,而Fool作家Taylor Carmichael则选择Afterpay。这就是我们这样想的原因。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/59fdacdf33b923f349ae38588b04f176\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is obviously the safer way into this future merger</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square显然是未来合并的更安全方式</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Anders Bylund(Square shares, please):</b>I'll concede that the Afterpay merger looks extremely likely to succeed. Every merger faces some challenges, but the arguments against this transaction have been muttered, not shouted. The regulatory approvals are continuing apace, and Square's shareholders approved the buyout with an overwhelming 99.8% of shareholder votes being cast in favor of the deal. The hurdles in front of the final approval are falling one by one, and the last John Hancock should be in place early next year.</p><p><blockquote><b>Anders Bylund(请分享Square股份):</b>我承认Afterpay合并看起来极有可能成功。每一次合并都面临一些挑战,但反对这笔交易的论据一直在喃喃自语,而不是大声疾呼。监管部门的批准仍在快速进行,Square的股东以压倒性的99.8%的股东投票批准了此次收购。最终批准面前的障碍正在一个接一个地落下,最后一个约翰·汉考克应该会在明年初到位。</blockquote></p><p> And there isn't much room for arbitrage here, either. Afterpay shares currently trade at 36.9% of Square's stock price, which is just a hair below the proposed stock-swap offer of 0.375 Square stubs for each Afterpay share. This ratio has been stable since Day One:</p><p><blockquote>而且这里也没有太大的套利空间。Afterpay股票目前的交易价格为Square股价的36.9%,仅略低于每股Afterpay股票0.375 Square stubs的拟议股票交换报价。该比率自第一天起一直保持稳定:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadb1031cd47e47b7b1758c53da2edd1\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>SQ DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的SQ数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Still, nothing is absolutely guaranteed until the ink is dry on the final paperwork. This is especially true for mergers going across national borders. For example, American semiconductor giant <b>Qualcomm</b>(NASDAQ:QCOM) was just one step or two away from completing its proposed $44 billion buyout of <b>NXP Semiconductors</b>(NASDAQ:NXPI) in 2018, until geopolitical concernsstopped that deal in its tracks. If this could happen to Qualcomm and NXP, it could happen to Square and Afterpay as well.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此,在最终文件上的墨水干了之前,没有什么是绝对保证的。对于跨国合并来说尤其如此。比如美国半导体巨头<b>Qualcomm</b>(纳斯达克:QCOM)距离完成其440亿美元收购的提议仅一两步之遥<b>恩智浦半导体</b>(纳斯达克:NXPI)2018年,直到地缘政治担忧阻止了该交易。如果这种情况可能发生在高通和恩智浦身上,那么它也可能发生在Square和Afterpay身上。</blockquote></p><p> On that note, there's a small chance that it actually matters whether you're buying Afterpay or Square shares today. If the deal falls apart for some reason, the American financial technology company looks like the safer stock to hold for the long haul. Both companies are growing their revenues at similar speeds, but Square is also an effective cash machine while Afterpay consistently reports negative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- and the cash is only burning faster over time:</p><p><blockquote>在这一点上,您今天购买Afterpay还是Square股票实际上很有可能很重要。如果交易因某种原因失败,这家美国金融科技公司看起来是长期持有的更安全的股票。两家公司的收入增长速度相似,但Square也是一台有效的提款机,而Afterpay的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)一直为负,而且随着时间的推移,现金只会燃烧得更快:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf20f5aa51051163c88a319a0fc117b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF EBITDA (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS. TTM = TRAILING-12-MONTHS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF EBITDA(TTM)数据。TTM=过去12个月。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> So this discussion is largely academic, but Square offers the better entry into the proposed merger just in case something goes wrong at the last minute.</p><p><blockquote>因此,这种讨论很大程度上是学术性的,但Square为拟议的合并提供了更好的入口,以防在最后一刻出现问题。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is marrying up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square要结婚了</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Taylor Carmichael(Afterpay):</b>I'm extremely bullish on Square, and I think Jack Dorsey is a genius. So it's pretty much impossible for me to be negative on Square. On the other hand, I'm probably the biggest fan of Afterpay at the Motley Fool. So let me speak on why Square was so willing to pay up for Afterpay, and why you want to own that Australian powerhouse if these two companies end up in divorce court (heaven forbid!)</p><p><blockquote><b>泰勒·卡迈克尔(后付费):</b>我非常看好Square,我认为Jack Dorsey是个天才。所以我几乎不可能对Square持否定态度。另一方面,我可能是Motley Fool Afterpay的最大粉丝。所以让我来谈谈为什么Square如此愿意支付Afterpay,以及如果这两家公司最终上了离婚法庭(但愿不会如此!)</blockquote></p><p> Afterpay is top dog and first mover in the BNPL space. If you don't know what that is, it'sinterest-free credit. Retailers happily pay for Afterpay's service, because it makes their revenues spike way higher.<b>Affirm</b>(NASDAQ:AFRM) and <b>PayPal</b>(NASDAQ:PYPL) are both copycats in this space. And Afterpay is still way ahead. For instance, on PayPal's recent earnings report, the company reported that it had processed $5.4 billion in total product volume (TPV) since the launch of the service a year ago. Afterpay dwarfs that number, reporting $22.4 billion in underlying sales.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay是BNPL领域的领头羊和先行者。如果你不知道那是什么,那就是无息信贷。零售商很乐意为Afterpay的服务付费,因为这使他们的收入飙升。<b>申明</b>(纳斯达克:AFRM)和<b>PayPal</b>(纳斯达克:PYPL)都是这个领域的模仿者。Afterpay仍然遥遥领先。例如,在PayPal最近的收益报告中,该公司报告称,自一年前推出该服务以来,它已处理了54亿美元的产品总量(TPV)。Afterpay的基本销售额为224亿美元,令这个数字相形见绌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Of course, competing with PayPal is a bit scary, as the American juggernaut has a massive network in place. Nonetheless, Afterpay invented the BNPL space, and it's Afterpay that is revolutionizing consumer debt around the world. Ultimately, credit cards are doomed, at least in retail. And it's Afterpay that is killing that sector.</p><p><blockquote>当然,与PayPal竞争有点可怕,因为美国巨头拥有庞大的网络。尽管如此,Afterpay发明了BNPL领域,正是Afterpay正在彻底改变世界各地的消费者债务。最终,信用卡注定要失败,至少在零售业是这样。正是Afterpay正在扼杀这个行业。</blockquote></p><p> One of the ways Afterpay is winning is by providing its service in brick-and-mortar retailers. Indeed, that's why the Australian company is such a good match for Square, since both companies are going after real-world market opportunities, not just internet commerce. So while PayPal and Affirm are seeing some internet tailwinds because of the lockdown, Afterpay absolutely crushed expectations in spite of the lockdown.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay获胜的方式之一是在实体零售商中提供服务。事实上,这就是为什么这家澳大利亚公司与Square如此匹配,因为两家公司都在追求现实世界的市场机会,而不仅仅是互联网商务。因此,虽然PayPal和Affirm因封锁而看到了一些互联网顺风车,但尽管有封锁,Afterpay绝对超出了预期。</blockquote></p><p> The other thing that's amazing about Afterpay is that it sees itself as a consumer brand first and foremost. So, for instance, Sept. 9-12 is designated \"Afterpay Day,\" when the company offers killer deals to all its subscribers across its whole universe of retailers.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay的另一个令人惊讶的地方是,它首先将自己视为一个消费品牌。因此,例如,9月9日至12日被指定为“后付费日”,该公司向其整个零售商领域的所有订户提供杀手级交易。</blockquote></p><p> All this success makes Afterpay a stronger stock. Don't believe me? Check out the stock charts. Let's compare Afterpay stock with the two titans of fintech, PayPal and Square.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些成功使Afterpay成为一只更强大的股票。不相信我?查看股票图表。让我们将Afterpay股票与金融科技两大巨头PayPal和Square进行比较。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffadef41cf18514f905fe65e0e26d42f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> It's not even close. And mind you, we're looking at the American Depository Receipts (ADR), trading here since 2018. Afterpay was an insane stock in the Australian markets for a full year before its ADR showed up.</p><p><blockquote>差远了。请注意,我们正在关注自2018年以来在这里交易的美国存托凭证(ADR)。在ADR出现之前,Afterpay在澳大利亚市场上整整一年都是一只疯狂的股票。</blockquote></p><p> If you have two amazing companies that are taking over the world, as an investor you usually want to be in the smaller one. As dynamic and wonderful as Square has been, Afterpay has been a significantly stronger stock for shareholders over the last several years.</p><p><blockquote>如果你有两家了不起的公司正在接管世界,作为投资者,你通常希望投资较小的公司。尽管Square充满活力且精彩,但Afterpay在过去几年中对股东来说一直是一只明显更强劲的股票。</blockquote></p><p> It's a happy union for sure. Nonetheless, if you dig into the numbers, you can see why Square paid so much for Afterpay.</p><p><blockquote>这肯定是一个幸福的结合。尽管如此,如果你深入研究这些数字,你就会明白为什么Square为Afterpay支付了如此多的费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Square vs. Afterpay<blockquote>更好的选择:Square与Afterpay</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Square vs. Afterpay<blockquote>更好的选择:Square与Afterpay</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-17 17:39</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Square</b>(NYSE:SQ), the company that brought <b>Bitcoin</b> to the masses and is revolutionizing the whole banking sector, surprised a lot of Fools when it made a deal to buy <b>Afterpay</b>(OTC:AFTP.F), the Australian creator of the \"buy now, pay later\" (BNPL) space that has taken the world by storm. Afterpay has upended the whole notion of credit by making it free (if you pay on time).</p><p><blockquote><b>平方</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:SQ),该公司带来了<b>比特币</b>并正在彻底改变整个银行业,当它达成收购交易时,让许多傻瓜感到惊讶<b>Afterpay</b>(场外交易代码:AFTP.F),风靡全球的“先买后付”(BNPL)空间的澳大利亚创造者。Afterpay使其免费(如果您按时付款),颠覆了整个信贷概念。</blockquote></p><p> Some Fools were unhappy that Square bought the unprofitable-but-fast-growing Australian superstar, arguing that CEO Jack Dorsey paid too much. Nonetheless, Dorsey has been right over and over again in the fintech space, so the criticisms of this merger weren't too loud. Still, some people might wish the union would fall apart. If it did, which company would you rather own?</p><p><blockquote>一些傻瓜对Square收购这位尚未盈利但发展迅速的澳大利亚巨星感到不满,认为首席执行官杰克·多西支付的费用太高。尽管如此,多尔西在金融科技领域一次又一次地说对了,所以对这次合并的批评并不是太大。尽管如此,有些人可能希望工会分崩离析。如果是的话,你更愿意拥有哪家公司?</blockquote></p><p> Fool contributor Anders Bylund says Square would be his choice, while Fool writer Taylor Carmichael opts for Afterpay. And here's why we think this way.</p><p><blockquote>Fool撰稿人Anders Bylund表示Square将是他的选择,而Fool作家Taylor Carmichael则选择Afterpay。这就是我们这样想的原因。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/59fdacdf33b923f349ae38588b04f176\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is obviously the safer way into this future merger</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square显然是未来合并的更安全方式</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Anders Bylund(Square shares, please):</b>I'll concede that the Afterpay merger looks extremely likely to succeed. Every merger faces some challenges, but the arguments against this transaction have been muttered, not shouted. The regulatory approvals are continuing apace, and Square's shareholders approved the buyout with an overwhelming 99.8% of shareholder votes being cast in favor of the deal. The hurdles in front of the final approval are falling one by one, and the last John Hancock should be in place early next year.</p><p><blockquote><b>Anders Bylund(请分享Square股份):</b>我承认Afterpay合并看起来极有可能成功。每一次合并都面临一些挑战,但反对这笔交易的论据一直在喃喃自语,而不是大声疾呼。监管部门的批准仍在快速进行,Square的股东以压倒性的99.8%的股东投票批准了此次收购。最终批准面前的障碍正在一个接一个地落下,最后一个约翰·汉考克应该会在明年初到位。</blockquote></p><p> And there isn't much room for arbitrage here, either. Afterpay shares currently trade at 36.9% of Square's stock price, which is just a hair below the proposed stock-swap offer of 0.375 Square stubs for each Afterpay share. This ratio has been stable since Day One:</p><p><blockquote>而且这里也没有太大的套利空间。Afterpay股票目前的交易价格为Square股价的36.9%,仅略低于每股Afterpay股票0.375 Square stubs的拟议股票交换报价。该比率自第一天起一直保持稳定:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadb1031cd47e47b7b1758c53da2edd1\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>SQ DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的SQ数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Still, nothing is absolutely guaranteed until the ink is dry on the final paperwork. This is especially true for mergers going across national borders. For example, American semiconductor giant <b>Qualcomm</b>(NASDAQ:QCOM) was just one step or two away from completing its proposed $44 billion buyout of <b>NXP Semiconductors</b>(NASDAQ:NXPI) in 2018, until geopolitical concernsstopped that deal in its tracks. If this could happen to Qualcomm and NXP, it could happen to Square and Afterpay as well.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此,在最终文件上的墨水干了之前,没有什么是绝对保证的。对于跨国合并来说尤其如此。比如美国半导体巨头<b>Qualcomm</b>(纳斯达克:QCOM)距离完成其440亿美元收购的提议仅一两步之遥<b>恩智浦半导体</b>(纳斯达克:NXPI)2018年,直到地缘政治担忧阻止了该交易。如果这种情况可能发生在高通和恩智浦身上,那么它也可能发生在Square和Afterpay身上。</blockquote></p><p> On that note, there's a small chance that it actually matters whether you're buying Afterpay or Square shares today. If the deal falls apart for some reason, the American financial technology company looks like the safer stock to hold for the long haul. Both companies are growing their revenues at similar speeds, but Square is also an effective cash machine while Afterpay consistently reports negative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- and the cash is only burning faster over time:</p><p><blockquote>在这一点上,您今天购买Afterpay还是Square股票实际上很有可能很重要。如果交易因某种原因失败,这家美国金融科技公司看起来是长期持有的更安全的股票。两家公司的收入增长速度相似,但Square也是一台有效的提款机,而Afterpay的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)一直为负,而且随着时间的推移,现金只会燃烧得更快:</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf20f5aa51051163c88a319a0fc117b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF EBITDA (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS. TTM = TRAILING-12-MONTHS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF EBITDA(TTM)数据。TTM=过去12个月。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> So this discussion is largely academic, but Square offers the better entry into the proposed merger just in case something goes wrong at the last minute.</p><p><blockquote>因此,这种讨论很大程度上是学术性的,但Square为拟议的合并提供了更好的入口,以防在最后一刻出现问题。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Square is marrying up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Square要结婚了</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Taylor Carmichael(Afterpay):</b>I'm extremely bullish on Square, and I think Jack Dorsey is a genius. So it's pretty much impossible for me to be negative on Square. On the other hand, I'm probably the biggest fan of Afterpay at the Motley Fool. So let me speak on why Square was so willing to pay up for Afterpay, and why you want to own that Australian powerhouse if these two companies end up in divorce court (heaven forbid!)</p><p><blockquote><b>泰勒·卡迈克尔(后付费):</b>我非常看好Square,我认为Jack Dorsey是个天才。所以我几乎不可能对Square持否定态度。另一方面,我可能是Motley Fool Afterpay的最大粉丝。所以让我来谈谈为什么Square如此愿意支付Afterpay,以及如果这两家公司最终上了离婚法庭(但愿不会如此!)</blockquote></p><p> Afterpay is top dog and first mover in the BNPL space. If you don't know what that is, it'sinterest-free credit. Retailers happily pay for Afterpay's service, because it makes their revenues spike way higher.<b>Affirm</b>(NASDAQ:AFRM) and <b>PayPal</b>(NASDAQ:PYPL) are both copycats in this space. And Afterpay is still way ahead. For instance, on PayPal's recent earnings report, the company reported that it had processed $5.4 billion in total product volume (TPV) since the launch of the service a year ago. Afterpay dwarfs that number, reporting $22.4 billion in underlying sales.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay是BNPL领域的领头羊和先行者。如果你不知道那是什么,那就是无息信贷。零售商很乐意为Afterpay的服务付费,因为这使他们的收入飙升。<b>申明</b>(纳斯达克:AFRM)和<b>PayPal</b>(纳斯达克:PYPL)都是这个领域的模仿者。Afterpay仍然遥遥领先。例如,在PayPal最近的收益报告中,该公司报告称,自一年前推出该服务以来,它已处理了54亿美元的产品总量(TPV)。Afterpay的基本销售额为224亿美元,令这个数字相形见绌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Of course, competing with PayPal is a bit scary, as the American juggernaut has a massive network in place. Nonetheless, Afterpay invented the BNPL space, and it's Afterpay that is revolutionizing consumer debt around the world. Ultimately, credit cards are doomed, at least in retail. And it's Afterpay that is killing that sector.</p><p><blockquote>当然,与PayPal竞争有点可怕,因为美国巨头拥有庞大的网络。尽管如此,Afterpay发明了BNPL领域,正是Afterpay正在彻底改变世界各地的消费者债务。最终,信用卡注定要失败,至少在零售业是这样。正是Afterpay正在扼杀这个行业。</blockquote></p><p> One of the ways Afterpay is winning is by providing its service in brick-and-mortar retailers. Indeed, that's why the Australian company is such a good match for Square, since both companies are going after real-world market opportunities, not just internet commerce. So while PayPal and Affirm are seeing some internet tailwinds because of the lockdown, Afterpay absolutely crushed expectations in spite of the lockdown.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay获胜的方式之一是在实体零售商中提供服务。事实上,这就是为什么这家澳大利亚公司与Square如此匹配,因为两家公司都在追求现实世界的市场机会,而不仅仅是互联网商务。因此,虽然PayPal和Affirm因封锁而看到了一些互联网顺风车,但尽管有封锁,Afterpay绝对超出了预期。</blockquote></p><p> The other thing that's amazing about Afterpay is that it sees itself as a consumer brand first and foremost. So, for instance, Sept. 9-12 is designated \"Afterpay Day,\" when the company offers killer deals to all its subscribers across its whole universe of retailers.</p><p><blockquote>Afterpay的另一个令人惊讶的地方是,它首先将自己视为一个消费品牌。因此,例如,9月9日至12日被指定为“后付费日”,该公司向其整个零售商领域的所有订户提供杀手级交易。</blockquote></p><p> All this success makes Afterpay a stronger stock. Don't believe me? Check out the stock charts. Let's compare Afterpay stock with the two titans of fintech, PayPal and Square.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些成功使Afterpay成为一只更强大的股票。不相信我?查看股票图表。让我们将Afterpay股票与金融科技两大巨头PayPal和Square进行比较。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffadef41cf18514f905fe65e0e26d42f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>AFTPF DATA BY YCHARTS</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的AFTPF数据</span></p></blockquote></p><p> It's not even close. And mind you, we're looking at the American Depository Receipts (ADR), trading here since 2018. Afterpay was an insane stock in the Australian markets for a full year before its ADR showed up.</p><p><blockquote>差远了。请注意,我们正在关注自2018年以来在这里交易的美国存托凭证(ADR)。在ADR出现之前,Afterpay在澳大利亚市场上整整一年都是一只疯狂的股票。</blockquote></p><p> If you have two amazing companies that are taking over the world, as an investor you usually want to be in the smaller one. As dynamic and wonderful as Square has been, Afterpay has been a significantly stronger stock for shareholders over the last several years.</p><p><blockquote>如果你有两家了不起的公司正在接管世界,作为投资者,你通常希望投资较小的公司。尽管Square充满活力且精彩,但Afterpay在过去几年中对股东来说一直是一只明显更强劲的股票。</blockquote></p><p> It's a happy union for sure. Nonetheless, if you dig into the numbers, you can see why Square paid so much for Afterpay.</p><p><blockquote>这肯定是一个幸福的结合。尽管如此,如果你深入研究这些数字,你就会明白为什么Square为Afterpay支付了如此多的费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/16/better-buy-square-vs-afterpay/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/16/better-buy-square-vs-afterpay/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121662992","content_text":"Square(NYSE:SQ), the company that brought Bitcoin to the masses and is revolutionizing the whole banking sector, surprised a lot of Fools when it made a deal to buy Afterpay(OTC:AFTP.F), the Australian creator of the \"buy now, pay later\" (BNPL) space that has taken the world by storm. Afterpay has upended the whole notion of credit by making it free (if you pay on time).\nSome Fools were unhappy that Square bought the unprofitable-but-fast-growing Australian superstar, arguing that CEO Jack Dorsey paid too much. Nonetheless, Dorsey has been right over and over again in the fintech space, so the criticisms of this merger weren't too loud. Still, some people might wish the union would fall apart. If it did, which company would you rather own?\nFool contributor Anders Bylund says Square would be his choice, while Fool writer Taylor Carmichael opts for Afterpay. And here's why we think this way.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nSquare is obviously the safer way into this future merger\nAnders Bylund(Square shares, please):I'll concede that the Afterpay merger looks extremely likely to succeed. Every merger faces some challenges, but the arguments against this transaction have been muttered, not shouted. The regulatory approvals are continuing apace, and Square's shareholders approved the buyout with an overwhelming 99.8% of shareholder votes being cast in favor of the deal. The hurdles in front of the final approval are falling one by one, and the last John Hancock should be in place early next year.\nAnd there isn't much room for arbitrage here, either. Afterpay shares currently trade at 36.9% of Square's stock price, which is just a hair below the proposed stock-swap offer of 0.375 Square stubs for each Afterpay share. This ratio has been stable since Day One:\nSQ DATA BY YCHARTS\nStill, nothing is absolutely guaranteed until the ink is dry on the final paperwork. This is especially true for mergers going across national borders. For example, American semiconductor giant Qualcomm(NASDAQ:QCOM) was just one step or two away from completing its proposed $44 billion buyout of NXP Semiconductors(NASDAQ:NXPI) in 2018, until geopolitical concernsstopped that deal in its tracks. If this could happen to Qualcomm and NXP, it could happen to Square and Afterpay as well.\nOn that note, there's a small chance that it actually matters whether you're buying Afterpay or Square shares today. If the deal falls apart for some reason, the American financial technology company looks like the safer stock to hold for the long haul. Both companies are growing their revenues at similar speeds, but Square is also an effective cash machine while Afterpay consistently reports negative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) -- and the cash is only burning faster over time:\nAFTPF EBITDA (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS. TTM = TRAILING-12-MONTHS.\nSo this discussion is largely academic, but Square offers the better entry into the proposed merger just in case something goes wrong at the last minute.\nSquare is marrying up\nTaylor Carmichael(Afterpay):I'm extremely bullish on Square, and I think Jack Dorsey is a genius. So it's pretty much impossible for me to be negative on Square. On the other hand, I'm probably the biggest fan of Afterpay at the Motley Fool. So let me speak on why Square was so willing to pay up for Afterpay, and why you want to own that Australian powerhouse if these two companies end up in divorce court (heaven forbid!)\nAfterpay is top dog and first mover in the BNPL space. If you don't know what that is, it'sinterest-free credit. Retailers happily pay for Afterpay's service, because it makes their revenues spike way higher.Affirm(NASDAQ:AFRM) and PayPal(NASDAQ:PYPL) are both copycats in this space. And Afterpay is still way ahead. For instance, on PayPal's recent earnings report, the company reported that it had processed $5.4 billion in total product volume (TPV) since the launch of the service a year ago. Afterpay dwarfs that number, reporting $22.4 billion in underlying sales.\nOf course, competing with PayPal is a bit scary, as the American juggernaut has a massive network in place. Nonetheless, Afterpay invented the BNPL space, and it's Afterpay that is revolutionizing consumer debt around the world. Ultimately, credit cards are doomed, at least in retail. And it's Afterpay that is killing that sector.\nOne of the ways Afterpay is winning is by providing its service in brick-and-mortar retailers. Indeed, that's why the Australian company is such a good match for Square, since both companies are going after real-world market opportunities, not just internet commerce. So while PayPal and Affirm are seeing some internet tailwinds because of the lockdown, Afterpay absolutely crushed expectations in spite of the lockdown.\nThe other thing that's amazing about Afterpay is that it sees itself as a consumer brand first and foremost. So, for instance, Sept. 9-12 is designated \"Afterpay Day,\" when the company offers killer deals to all its subscribers across its whole universe of retailers.\nAll this success makes Afterpay a stronger stock. Don't believe me? Check out the stock charts. Let's compare Afterpay stock with the two titans of fintech, PayPal and Square.\nAFTPF DATA BY YCHARTS\nIt's not even close. And mind you, we're looking at the American Depository Receipts (ADR), trading here since 2018. Afterpay was an insane stock in the Australian markets for a full year before its ADR showed up.\nIf you have two amazing companies that are taking over the world, as an investor you usually want to be in the smaller one. As dynamic and wonderful as Square has been, Afterpay has been a significantly stronger stock for shareholders over the last several years.\nIt's a happy union for sure. Nonetheless, if you dig into the numbers, you can see why Square paid so much for Afterpay.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SQ":0.9,"AFTPF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2335,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":842029276,"gmtCreate":1636121392830,"gmtModify":1636121399445,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842029276","repostId":"1156284404","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156284404","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636121042,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1156284404?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 22:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买:迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156284404","media":"Motley Fool ","summary":"Both have strong brands, but one gets the nod.","content":"<p>It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.</p><p><blockquote>在两家优质公司之间总是很难做出选择。理想情况下,你可能想两者都买。然而,投资往往归结为把你的血汗钱放在哪里。</blockquote></p><p> That's the case with <b>Walt Disney</b> and <b>Starbucks</b>. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the <b>S&P 500</b> has risen by 24% during that time.</p><p><blockquote>情况就是这样<b>迪斯尼</b>和<b>星巴克</b>两只股票都经历了充满挑战的2021年。迪士尼股价下跌6%,星巴克股价下跌5%。这是作为<b>标普500</b>在此期间上涨了24%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92d7cd6a38784299fa1cce99ae01a4cd\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> However, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?</p><p><blockquote>然而,两者都为投资者提供了坚实的长期增长前景。问题是:目前哪一项是更好的投资?</blockquote></p><p> <b>Starbucks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星巴克</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from higher costs that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.</p><p><blockquote>投资者显然不喜欢星巴克最新的季度收益报告。10月底发布后,该股下跌6%,至106美元左右。这个问题源于成本上升,这可能会继续影响近期盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> In the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.</p><p><blockquote>最近一个季度,星巴克在美国的营业利润率。公认会计原则(GAAP)增长了一倍多,达到18.2%。但管理层预计明年的利润率为17%,这主要是由于工资上涨。虽然这低于18%至19%的长期目标,但我相信这将是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> That's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.</p><p><blockquote>这是因为星巴克继续保持强劲的销售增长。这将有助于公司提高价格并利用费用。</blockquote></p><p> Starbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,</p><p><blockquote>受新餐厅开业和同店销售额增长17%的推动,星巴克季度营收增长31%至81亿美元。管理层预计2022财年的销售额将实现高个位数百分比增长,并将开设2,000家餐厅,其中大部分在美国境外。预计这些将带来325亿至330亿美元的收入,</blockquote></p><p> In short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之,对星巴克产品的需求在疫情期间因商店关闭而暂停,但仍然强劲。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>迪斯尼</b></blockquote></p><p> Disney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.</p><p><blockquote>由于担心其流媒体服务Disney+增长放缓,迪士尼股价今年下跌。由于它在疫情期间突飞猛进,我并不担心。</blockquote></p><p> After all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟,截至2021年7月初,Disney+的付费用户为1.16亿,而4月份为1.036亿。这也是一年前5750万的两倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.</p><p><blockquote>虽然Disney+可能没有过去的超音速增长,但它仍在以不错的速度增加订户。更重要的是,迪士尼不仅仅是一个流媒体服务。其庞大的媒体帝国包括公园、电影、几个电视网络和零售店。</blockquote></p><p> This helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.</p><p><blockquote>这有助于公司取得强劲的业绩,即使业务的一部分放缓。例如,今年帮助其ESPN网络的体育直播回归,主题公园重新开放。其季度收入同比增长45%,达到170亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> With popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.</p><p><blockquote>凭借受欢迎的媒体资产,如漫威角色和电影的稳定,迪士尼的未来看起来一片光明。这是因为它拥有高度认可和备受推崇的品牌,这些品牌已经证明了它们的持久力。管理层加强了其地位,包括几年前收购了二十一世纪福克斯公司,该公司增加了电视网络、漫威角色,并提供了流媒体服务Hulu的控股权。</blockquote></p><p> After examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.</p><p><blockquote>考察了两家公司后,两家公司都有吸引很多人的强大品牌。对我来说,优势在于星巴克,因为它自2010年以来增加了股息,包括在大流行期间。很高兴收到收入,这是管理层和董事会对未来有信心的积极迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Unfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.</p><p><blockquote>不幸的是,迪士尼去年暂停了股息。虽然考虑到疫情造成的不确定性,这当然是可以理解的,但这确实给星巴克带来了帮助,星巴克认为增加支付是合适的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买:迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买:迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool </strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-05 22:04</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.</p><p><blockquote>在两家优质公司之间总是很难做出选择。理想情况下,你可能想两者都买。然而,投资往往归结为把你的血汗钱放在哪里。</blockquote></p><p> That's the case with <b>Walt Disney</b> and <b>Starbucks</b>. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the <b>S&P 500</b> has risen by 24% during that time.</p><p><blockquote>情况就是这样<b>迪斯尼</b>和<b>星巴克</b>两只股票都经历了充满挑战的2021年。迪士尼股价下跌6%,星巴克股价下跌5%。这是作为<b>标普500</b>在此期间上涨了24%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92d7cd6a38784299fa1cce99ae01a4cd\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源:盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> However, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?</p><p><blockquote>然而,两者都为投资者提供了坚实的长期增长前景。问题是:目前哪一项是更好的投资?</blockquote></p><p> <b>Starbucks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星巴克</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from higher costs that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.</p><p><blockquote>投资者显然不喜欢星巴克最新的季度收益报告。10月底发布后,该股下跌6%,至106美元左右。这个问题源于成本上升,这可能会继续影响近期盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> In the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.</p><p><blockquote>最近一个季度,星巴克在美国的营业利润率。公认会计原则(GAAP)增长了一倍多,达到18.2%。但管理层预计明年的利润率为17%,这主要是由于工资上涨。虽然这低于18%至19%的长期目标,但我相信这将是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> That's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.</p><p><blockquote>这是因为星巴克继续保持强劲的销售增长。这将有助于公司提高价格并利用费用。</blockquote></p><p> Starbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,</p><p><blockquote>受新餐厅开业和同店销售额增长17%的推动,星巴克季度营收增长31%至81亿美元。管理层预计2022财年的销售额将实现高个位数百分比增长,并将开设2,000家餐厅,其中大部分在美国境外。预计这些将带来325亿至330亿美元的收入,</blockquote></p><p> In short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之,对星巴克产品的需求在疫情期间因商店关闭而暂停,但仍然强劲。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>迪斯尼</b></blockquote></p><p> Disney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.</p><p><blockquote>由于担心其流媒体服务Disney+增长放缓,迪士尼股价今年下跌。由于它在疫情期间突飞猛进,我并不担心。</blockquote></p><p> After all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟,截至2021年7月初,Disney+的付费用户为1.16亿,而4月份为1.036亿。这也是一年前5750万的两倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.</p><p><blockquote>虽然Disney+可能没有过去的超音速增长,但它仍在以不错的速度增加订户。更重要的是,迪士尼不仅仅是一个流媒体服务。其庞大的媒体帝国包括公园、电影、几个电视网络和零售店。</blockquote></p><p> This helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.</p><p><blockquote>这有助于公司取得强劲的业绩,即使业务的一部分放缓。例如,今年帮助其ESPN网络的体育直播回归,主题公园重新开放。其季度收入同比增长45%,达到170亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> With popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.</p><p><blockquote>凭借受欢迎的媒体资产,如漫威角色和电影的稳定,迪士尼的未来看起来一片光明。这是因为它拥有高度认可和备受推崇的品牌,这些品牌已经证明了它们的持久力。管理层加强了其地位,包括几年前收购了二十一世纪福克斯公司,该公司增加了电视网络、漫威角色,并提供了流媒体服务Hulu的控股权。</blockquote></p><p> After examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.</p><p><blockquote>考察了两家公司后,两家公司都有吸引很多人的强大品牌。对我来说,优势在于星巴克,因为它自2010年以来增加了股息,包括在大流行期间。很高兴收到收入,这是管理层和董事会对未来有信心的积极迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Unfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.</p><p><blockquote>不幸的是,迪士尼去年暂停了股息。虽然考虑到疫情造成的不确定性,这当然是可以理解的,但这确实给星巴克带来了帮助,星巴克认为增加支付是合适的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/better-buy-disney-vs-starbucks/\">Motley Fool </a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SBUX":"星巴克","DIS":"迪士尼"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/better-buy-disney-vs-starbucks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156284404","content_text":"It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.\nThat's the case with Walt Disney and Starbucks. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the S&P 500 has risen by 24% during that time.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nHowever, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?\nStarbucks\nInvestors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from higher costs that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.\nIn the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.\nThat's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.\nStarbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,\nIn short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.\nWalt Disney\nDisney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.\nAfter all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.\nWhile it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.\nThis helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.\nWith popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.\nAfter examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.\nUnfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SBUX":0.9,"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2522,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":849425149,"gmtCreate":1635774590297,"gmtModify":1635774590510,"author":{"id":"3579171701347900","authorId":"3579171701347900","name":"MERV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8240474b51adfbbd9ac12a9bbc11ecd","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579171701347900","idStr":"3579171701347900"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls thanks","listText":"Like pls thanks","text":"Like pls thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/849425149","repostId":"2179250221","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2179250221","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635721559,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2179250221?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-01 07:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Federal Reserve decision, October jobs report: What to know this week<blockquote>美联储决定、十月就业报告:本周需要了解什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2179250221","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set th","content":"<p><div> The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set the stage for a long-awaited announcement of asset-purchase tapering. Meanwhile, traders will also ...</p><p><blockquote><div>美联储即将召开的货币政策会议将成为本周的焦点,并可能为期待已久的资产购买缩减公告奠定基础。与此同时,交易者也将...</div></blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页链接</a> </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Federal Reserve decision, October jobs report: What to know this week<blockquote>美联储决定、十月就业报告:本周需要了解什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFederal Reserve decision, October jobs report: What to know this week<blockquote>美联储决定、十月就业报告:本周需要了解什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Yahoo Finance</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-01 07:05</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set the stage for a long-awaited announcement of asset-purchase tapering. Meanwhile, traders will also ...</p><p><blockquote><div>美联储即将召开的货币政策会议将成为本周的焦点,并可能为期待已久的资产购买缩减公告奠定基础。与此同时,交易者也将...</div></blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页链接</a> </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html\">Yahoo Finance</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","ATVI":"动视暴雪","APO":"阿波罗全球管理","EL":"雅诗兰黛","BLMN":"Bloomin' Brands","PFE":"辉瑞",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","UBER":"优步","RL":"拉夫劳伦","CLX":"高乐氏","COP":"康菲石油","CRSR":"Corsair Gaming, Inc."},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/federal-reserve-meeting-october-jobs-report-what-to-know-this-week-151259921.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2179250221","content_text":"The Federal Reserve's forthcoming monetary policy meeting will be in focus this week, and may set the stage for a long-awaited announcement of asset-purchase tapering. Meanwhile, traders will also await more data on the U.S. economic recovery with the Labor Department's monthly jobs report later this week.\nThe Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) November meeting will take place from Tuesday to Wednesday, with the policy statement and press conference from the meeting serving as the central bank's penultimate opportunity this year to announce formal plans to begin rolling back its crisis-era quantitative easing program. For the past year-and-a-half, the central bank has been purchasing $120 billion per month in agency mortgage-backed securities and Treasuries, as one major tool to support the economy during the pandemic.\nIn late September, the FOMC's latest monetary policy statement and press conference from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell suggested the central bank was apt to announce the start of tapering before year-end, and continue the tapering process until \"around the middle of next year.\"\n\"The upcoming FOMC meeting will be important for three reasons: 1) the announcement of tapering; 2) guidance around what tapering means for the path of hikes; and 3) nuanced changes in views around inflation risks given recent data,\" wrote Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer in a note.\n\"The statement that announces the new pace of asset purchases will be followed by a note regarding flexibility stating that asset purchases are not on a pre-set course and will depend on the outlook for the labor market and inflation as well as an assessment of the efficacy of asset purchases,\" she predicted.\nShe noted that Powell may also use the press conference to reiterate that the end of tapering would not necessarily indicate the start of rate hikes, and that both policy actions are distinct. In previous public remarks, Powell has already made a similar point in previous public remarks, saying, \"the timing and pace of the coming reduction in asset purchases will not be intended to carry a direct signal regarding the timing of interest rate liftoff.\"\nGiven the market has been anticipating the start to tapering for months now, speculation around when the Fed will make a move on interest rates has become a point of particular interest to investors. Investors and economists have mulled whether the Fed may need to act more quickly than previously telegraphed on adjusting interest rates to stave off inflation, which has proven more long-lasting than some had suggested.\nWASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 24: Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell testifies during a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on September 24, 2020 in Washington, DC. Powell and U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin are testifying about the CARES Act and the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)Drew Angerer via Getty Images\nIn September, core personal consumption expenditures — the Fed's preferred gauge of underlying inflation — rose 3.6% over last year for a fourth consecutive month, coming in at the fastest clip since 1991. And earlier this month, Powell acknowledged in public remarks that the supply chain constraints and shortages that spurred the latest rise in prices are \"likely to last longer than previously expected, likely well into next year.\"\nWhile the central bank will not release an updated Summary of Economic Projections with their policy statement on Wednesday, the latest projections from the September meeting suggested the committee was split on rate hikes for 2022, with nine members seeing no rate hikes by the end of next year while the other nine members saw at least one hike.\n\"I think the Fed has pretty well determined to start the taper pretty quickly. We expect them to announce it next week and then start it soon thereafter, so that's pretty well carved in stone,\" Kathy Jones, Charles Schwab chief fixed income strategist, told Yahoo Finance Live last week. \"I think the big debate now is how quickly the Fed moves toward actually raising rates. The expectation in the market has really shifted to expecting as many as two rate hikes in 2022 and 2023 ... that’s a pretty aggressive pace of tightening.\"\nOctober jobs report\nOne of this week's most closely watched pieces of economic data will be the October jobs report, which is due for release on Friday from the Labor Department.\nEconomists are looking to see a pick-up in the pace of hiring for October after a disappointing print in September, when just 194,000 non-farm payrolls returned versus the half million expected. Over the past two months, payroll gains averaged at just 280,000. The unemployment rate is expected to take another small step toward pre-pandemic levels in October as well, with the jobless rate anticipated to dip to 4.7% from 4.8% the prior month.\nStill, the labor market has still fallen short its pre-pandemic conditions on a number of fronts. The unemployment rate has yet to return to its 50-year low of 3.5% from February 2020. And as of September, the civilian labor force was still down by about 3.1 million individuals from pre-virus levels.\nOne factor weighing on the labor market in August and September was the Delta variant, which may have deterred some workers from seeking employment in person for risk of infection. And an ongoing element dragging on the labor market's recovery has been a mismatch of supply and demand, with employers struggling to fill a near-record number of job openings while voluntary quits jumped to a historically high level.\n\"Next week’s October payrolls report will shed light on whether supply eased on diminishing constraints or if the labor market continues to face headwinds for now,\" wrote Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist for High Frequency Economics, in a note last week.\nBut some data from the past couple weeks has reflected favorably on conditions in the labor market in October. Weekly new unemployment claims broke below 300,000 for the first time since the start of the pandemic during the survey week for the October jobs report, or the week that includes the 12th of the month. And in the Conference Board's October Consumer Confidence Index, just 10.6% of consumers said jobs were \"hard to get,\" down from 13.0% in September. That brought the Conference Board's closely watched labor market differential, or percentage of consumers saying jobs are \"hard to get\" subtracted from the percentage saying jobs \"are plentiful,\" to 45, or its highest level since 2000.\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Markit U.S. Manufacturing PMI, Oct. final (59.3 expected, 59.2 in September); Constructing spending, month-over-month, September (0.4% expected, 0.0% in August); ISM Manufacturing Index, Oct. (60.5 expected, 61.1 in September)\nTuesday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nWednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Oct. 29 (0.3% during prior week); ADP Employment Change, Oct. (400,000 expected, 568,000 in September); ISM Services Index, October (62.0 expected, 61.9 in September); Factory Orders, September (-0.1% expected, 1.2% in August); Durable goods orders, September final (-0.4% in prior print; Durable goods orders excluding transportation, September final (0.4% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, September final (0.8% in prior print); Markit U.S. Services PMI, October final (58.2 expected, 58.2 in prior print); Markit U.S. Composite PMI, October final (57.3 in prior print); Federal Open Market Committee monetary policy decision\nThursday: Challenger job cuts, year-over-year, October (-84.9% in September); Initial jobless claims, week ended Oct. 30 (275,000 expected, 281,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Oct. 23 (2.147 million expected, 2.243 million during prior week); Non-farm productivity, Q3 preliminary (-3.2% expected, 2.1% in Q2); Unit Labor Costs, Q3 preliminary (6.9% expected, 1.3% in Q2); Trade balance, September (-$80.1 billion expected, -$73.3 billion in August)\nFriday: Change in non-farm payrolls, October (450,000 expected, 194,000 in September); Unemployment rate, October (4.7% expected, 4.8% in September); Average hourly earnings, month-over-month, October (4.7% expected, 4.8% in September); Average hourly earnings, year-over-year, October (4.9% expected, 4.6% in September); Labor Force Participation Rate, October (61.8% expected, 61.6% in September); Consumer Credit, September ($16.200 billion expected, $14.379 million in August)\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: Clorox (CLX), Avis Budget Group (CAR), ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI), Chegg Inc. (CHGG), Diamondback Energy (FANG), The Simon Property Group (SPG) after market close\nTuesday: Under Armour (UAA), Estee Lauder (EL), Ralph Lauren (RL), Apollo Global Management (APO), Corsair Gaming (CRSR), Bloomin' Brands (BLMN), ConocoPhillips (COP), Pfizer (PFE), Groupon (GPN), Marathon Petroleum (MPC) before market open; Mondelez (MDLZ), T-Mobile (TMUS), Akamai (AKAM), Activision Blizzard (ATVI), Lyft (LYFT), Match Group (MTCH), Devon Energy (DVN), Chesapeake Energy (CHK), Coursera (COUR), Zillow Group (ZG), Amgen (AMGN) after market close\nWednesday: Humana (HUM), Discovery Inc. (DISCA), The New York Times (NYT), Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH), Marriott International (MAR), CVS Health Corp. (CVS), Sinclair Broadcast Group (SBGI) before market open; Booking Holdings (BKNG), Qorvo (QRVO), The Allstate Corp. (ALL), MGM Resorts International (MGM), $Take-Two Interactive Software(TTWO)$ (TTWO), Electronic Arts (EA), Vimeo (VMEO), Etsy (ETSY), GoDaddy (GDDY), Marathon Oil Corp. (MRO), Roku (ROKU), Qualcomm (QCOM) after market close\nThursday: Cigna (CI), Wayfair (W), ViacomCBS (VIAC), Nikola (NKLA), Duke Energy (DUK), Citrix Systems (CTXS), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN), Hanesbrands (HBI), Moderna (MRNA), Planet Fitness (PLNT), Vulcan Material (VMC), Kellogg (K), Square (SQ), Cloudflare (NET), Occidental Petroleum (OXY), Uber Technologies (UBER), American International Group (AIG), Shake Shack (SHAK), iHeartMedia (IHRT), Novavax (NVAX), IAC Interactive Corp. (IAC), Peloton (PTON), Dropbox (DBX), DataDog (DDOG), Pinterest (PINS), Skyworks Solutions (SWKS), Expedia (EXPE), Rocket Cos. (RKT), Live Nation Entertainment (LYV), Airbnb (ABNB)\nFriday: Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Dish Networks (DISH), Dominion Energy (D), DraftKings (DKNG), Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT), Cinemark Holdings (CNK) before market open","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"PFE":0.9,"CLX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"CRSR":0.9,"UBER":0.9,"ATVI":0.9,"EL":0.9,"RL":0.9,"COP":0.9,"APO":0.9,"BLMN":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}