Kazmir的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Kazmir

Kazmir

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

468关注

11粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-11-24

Like pls

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-28

Like and comment

Cloudflare: High-Quality Business, But Not Cheap<blockquote>Cloudflare：高质量的业务，但不便宜</blockquote>

2021-12-16

Like

Toplines Before US Market Open on Thursday<blockquote>周四美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>

2021-12-17

Like pls

10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>

2021-12-16

Like pls

10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>

2021-11-15

Like pls

Shoppers Are Heading to Malls Again. These Stocks Are Good Bets.<blockquote>购物者再次前往购物中心。这些股票是不错的选择。</blockquote>

2021-09-14

Like pls

Apple App Store: The Tide Is Turning<blockquote>苹果应用商店：潮流正在转向</blockquote>

2021-07-22

Like and comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-28

Like

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-24

Like pls

XPeng shares rose nearly 12% in early trading<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价早盘涨近12%</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3558609398993628","uuid":"3558609398993628","gmtCreate":1595518380257,"gmtModify":1637319063647,"name":"Kazmir","pinyin":"kazmir","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":11,"headSize":468,"tweetSize":138,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.93%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-2","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"资深虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1000天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.04.20","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.65%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":692187709,"gmtCreate":1640876120519,"gmtModify":1640876120696,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692187709","repostId":"1198843840","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198843840","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640876050,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198843840?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 22:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Some Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198843840","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fel","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>早盘部分半导体股下跌。美光科技跌超2%，AMD跌超1%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efacf4051c66545659fa3d5d20db533d\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"430\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Some Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSome Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 22:54</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>早盘部分半导体股下跌。美光科技跌超2%，AMD跌超1%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efacf4051c66545659fa3d5d20db533d\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"430\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司","MU":"美光科技"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198843840","content_text":"Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MU":0.9,"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3008,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696534195,"gmtCreate":1640733070940,"gmtModify":1640733071122,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696534195","repostId":"1186633322","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2768,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696371566,"gmtCreate":1640641734451,"gmtModify":1640641734652,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696371566","repostId":"2194177239","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2194177239","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640559609,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2194177239?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-27 07:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Santa Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2194177239","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for the coming days.The S&P 500  is entering the period known for ushering in the so-called Santa Claus Rally, or seasonally strong timeframe for stocks at the end of each year.According to data from LPL Financial, the Santa Claus Rally period encapsulates the seven days most likely to be higher in any ","content":"<p><div> As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for ...</p><p><blockquote><div>随着交易员从假期缩短的一周中回归，进入新的一年的价格走势将受到密切关注——特别是考虑到相对清淡的经济数据和收益日历...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Santa Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSanta Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Yahoo Finance</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-27 07:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for ...</p><p><blockquote><div>随着交易员从假期缩短的一周中回归，进入新的一年的价格走势将受到密切关注——特别是考虑到相对清淡的经济数据和收益日历...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">Yahoo Finance</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源","BK4096":"电气部件与设备","BK4541":"氢能源","SPY.AU":"SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2194177239","content_text":"As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for the coming days.\nThe S&P 500 (^GSPC) is entering the period known for ushering in the so-called Santa Claus Rally, or seasonally strong timeframe for stocks at the end of each year.\nThe term, coined by Stock Trader's Almanac in the 1970s, encompasses the final five trading days of the year and first two sessions of the new year. This year, that Santa Claus Rally window is set to start on Monday, Dec. 27 — or the latest a Santa Claus rally has started in 11 years, due to the timing of the holidays this year.\nAccording to data from LPL Financial, the Santa Claus Rally period encapsulates the seven days most likely to be higher in any given year. Since 1950, the Santa Claus Rally period has produced a positive return for the S&P 500 78.9% of the time, with an average return of 1.33%.\n“Why are these seven days so strong?” wrote Ryan Detrick, LPL Financial chief market strategist, in a note. “Whether optimism over a coming new year, holiday spending, traders on vacation, institutions squaring up their books — or the holiday spirit — the bottom line is that bulls tend to believe in Santa.”\nAnd if history is any indication, the absence of a Santa Claus Rally has also typically served as a harbinger of lower near-term returns.\n\"Going back to the mid-1990s, there have been only six times Santa failed to show in December. January was lower five of those six times, and the full year had a solid gain only once (in 2016, but a mini-bear market early in the year),\" Detrick added.\n“Considering the bear markets of 2000 and 2008 both took place after one of the rare instances that Santa failed to show makes believers out of us,\" he said. A bear market typically refers to when stocks drop at least 20% from recent record highs. \"Should this seasonally strong period miss the mark, it could be a warning sign.\"\nAnd this year, investors do have considerable additional concerns to mull heading into the new year. Though stocks closed out Thursday's session at fresh record highs before the long holiday weekend, December still marked a volatile month to start, with renewed concerns over the Omicron variant and the potential for tighter monetary policy from the Federal Reserve weighing on risk assets. Plus, prospects for more near-term fiscal support via the Biden administration's Build Back Better bill have dwindled, and inflation concerns spiked further. Last week, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) — the Fed's preferred inflation gauge — rose at a 4.7% year-over-year clip, or the fastest since 1983.\n\"If the U.S. was not battling the Omicron variant, U.S. stocks would be dancing higher as the Santa Claus Rally would have kept the climb going into uncharted territory,\" Edward Moya, chief market strategist at OANDA, wrote in a note last week. \"It is too early to say for sure if we will get a Santa Claus Rally, but given all the short-term risks of Fed tightening, Chinese weakness, fiscal support uncertainty and COVID, Wall Street is not complaining.\"\nA man in a Santa Claus costume gestures on the floor at the closing bell of the Dow Industrial Average at the New York Stock Exchange on December 5, 2019 in New York. (Photo by Bryan R. Smith / AFP) (Photo by BRYAN R. SMITH/AFP via Getty Images)BRYAN R. SMITH via Getty Images\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Dallas Federal Reserve Manufacturing Activity Index, Dec. (13.0 expected, 11.8 in November)\nTuesday: FHFA House Price Index, month-over-month, October (0.9% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Index, month-over-month, October (0.9% expected, 0.96% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Index, year-over-year, October (18.6%. expected, 19.05% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index, year-over-year, November (19.51% in October); Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index, December (11 expected,11 in November)\nWednesday: Wholesale Inventories, month-over-month, November preliminary (1.7% expected, 2.3% in October); Advance Goods Trade Balance, November (-$89.0 billion expected, -$82.9 billion in October); Retail Inventories, month-over-month, November (0.5% expected, 0.1% in October); Pending Home Sales, month-over-month, November (0.5% expected, 7.5% in October)\nThursday: Initial jobless claims, week ended Dec. 25. (205,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Dec. 18 (1.859 million during prior week); MNI Chicago PMI, December (62.2 expected, 61.8 in November)\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nTuesday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nWednesday: FuelCell Energy Inc. (FCEL) before market open\nThursday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY.AU":0.9,"FCEL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2804,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696964600,"gmtCreate":1640602725302,"gmtModify":1640602882232,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696964600","repostId":"2194177239","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2194177239","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640559609,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2194177239?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-27 07:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Santa Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2194177239","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for the coming days.The S&P 500  is entering the period known for ushering in the so-called Santa Claus Rally, or seasonally strong timeframe for stocks at the end of each year.According to data from LPL Financial, the Santa Claus Rally period encapsulates the seven days most likely to be higher in any ","content":"<p><div> As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for ...</p><p><blockquote><div>随着交易员从假期缩短的一周中回归，进入新的一年的价格走势将受到密切关注——特别是考虑到相对清淡的经济数据和收益日历...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Santa Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSanta Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Yahoo Finance</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-27 07:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for ...</p><p><blockquote><div>随着交易员从假期缩短的一周中回归，进入新的一年的价格走势将受到密切关注——特别是考虑到相对清淡的经济数据和收益日历...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">Yahoo Finance</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源","BK4096":"电气部件与设备","BK4541":"氢能源","SPY.AU":"SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2194177239","content_text":"As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for the coming days.\nThe S&P 500 (^GSPC) is entering the period known for ushering in the so-called Santa Claus Rally, or seasonally strong timeframe for stocks at the end of each year.\nThe term, coined by Stock Trader's Almanac in the 1970s, encompasses the final five trading days of the year and first two sessions of the new year. This year, that Santa Claus Rally window is set to start on Monday, Dec. 27 — or the latest a Santa Claus rally has started in 11 years, due to the timing of the holidays this year.\nAccording to data from LPL Financial, the Santa Claus Rally period encapsulates the seven days most likely to be higher in any given year. Since 1950, the Santa Claus Rally period has produced a positive return for the S&P 500 78.9% of the time, with an average return of 1.33%.\n“Why are these seven days so strong?” wrote Ryan Detrick, LPL Financial chief market strategist, in a note. “Whether optimism over a coming new year, holiday spending, traders on vacation, institutions squaring up their books — or the holiday spirit — the bottom line is that bulls tend to believe in Santa.”\nAnd if history is any indication, the absence of a Santa Claus Rally has also typically served as a harbinger of lower near-term returns.\n\"Going back to the mid-1990s, there have been only six times Santa failed to show in December. January was lower five of those six times, and the full year had a solid gain only once (in 2016, but a mini-bear market early in the year),\" Detrick added.\n“Considering the bear markets of 2000 and 2008 both took place after one of the rare instances that Santa failed to show makes believers out of us,\" he said. A bear market typically refers to when stocks drop at least 20% from recent record highs. \"Should this seasonally strong period miss the mark, it could be a warning sign.\"\nAnd this year, investors do have considerable additional concerns to mull heading into the new year. Though stocks closed out Thursday's session at fresh record highs before the long holiday weekend, December still marked a volatile month to start, with renewed concerns over the Omicron variant and the potential for tighter monetary policy from the Federal Reserve weighing on risk assets. Plus, prospects for more near-term fiscal support via the Biden administration's Build Back Better bill have dwindled, and inflation concerns spiked further. Last week, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) — the Fed's preferred inflation gauge — rose at a 4.7% year-over-year clip, or the fastest since 1983.\n\"If the U.S. was not battling the Omicron variant, U.S. stocks would be dancing higher as the Santa Claus Rally would have kept the climb going into uncharted territory,\" Edward Moya, chief market strategist at OANDA, wrote in a note last week. \"It is too early to say for sure if we will get a Santa Claus Rally, but given all the short-term risks of Fed tightening, Chinese weakness, fiscal support uncertainty and COVID, Wall Street is not complaining.\"\nA man in a Santa Claus costume gestures on the floor at the closing bell of the Dow Industrial Average at the New York Stock Exchange on December 5, 2019 in New York. (Photo by Bryan R. Smith / AFP) (Photo by BRYAN R. SMITH/AFP via Getty Images)BRYAN R. SMITH via Getty Images\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Dallas Federal Reserve Manufacturing Activity Index, Dec. (13.0 expected, 11.8 in November)\nTuesday: FHFA House Price Index, month-over-month, October (0.9% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Index, month-over-month, October (0.9% expected, 0.96% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Index, year-over-year, October (18.6%. expected, 19.05% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index, year-over-year, November (19.51% in October); Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index, December (11 expected,11 in November)\nWednesday: Wholesale Inventories, month-over-month, November preliminary (1.7% expected, 2.3% in October); Advance Goods Trade Balance, November (-$89.0 billion expected, -$82.9 billion in October); Retail Inventories, month-over-month, November (0.5% expected, 0.1% in October); Pending Home Sales, month-over-month, November (0.5% expected, 7.5% in October)\nThursday: Initial jobless claims, week ended Dec. 25. (205,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Dec. 18 (1.859 million during prior week); MNI Chicago PMI, December (62.2 expected, 61.8 in November)\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nTuesday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nWednesday: FuelCell Energy Inc. (FCEL) before market open\nThursday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY.AU":0.9,"FCEL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3138,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696964129,"gmtCreate":1640602701551,"gmtModify":1640602873002,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696964129","repostId":"1137690498","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3437,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":698584201,"gmtCreate":1640453690636,"gmtModify":1640453690834,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698584201","repostId":"2193317305","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2516,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":698934109,"gmtCreate":1640273477796,"gmtModify":1640273477939,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698934109","repostId":"1192623075","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192623075","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640269891,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1192623075?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-23 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. adds Merck pill as 2nd easy-to-use drug against COVID-19<blockquote>美国将默克药丸作为第二种易于使用的抗COVID-19药物</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192623075","media":"SeattleTimes","summary":"U.S. health regulators on Thursday authorized the second pill against COVID-19, providing another ea","content":"<p>U.S. health regulators on Thursday authorized the second pill against COVID-19, providing another easy-to-use medication to battle the rising tide of omicron infections.</p><p><blockquote>美国卫生监管机构周四批准了第二种针对COVID-19的药物，提供了另一种易于使用的药物来对抗不断上升的奥密克戎感染浪潮。</blockquote></p><p> The Food and Drug Administration authorization of Merck’s molnupiravir comes one day after the agency cleared a competing drug from Pfizer. That pill, Paxlovid, is likely to become the first-choice treatment against the virus, thanks to its superior benefits and milder side effects.</p><p><blockquote>美国食品和药物管理局批准默克公司的molnupiravir的一天前，该机构批准了辉瑞公司的一种竞争药物。这种名为Paxlovid的药物很可能成为针对该病毒的首选治疗方法，因为它具有优越的益处和较温和的副作用。</blockquote></p><p> As a result, Merck’s pill is expected to have a smaller role against the pandemic than predicted just a few weeks ago. Its ability to head off severe COVID-19 is much smaller than initially announced and the drug label will warn of serious safety issues, including the potential for birth defects.</p><p><blockquote>因此，默克公司的药物预计对疫情的作用将比几周前预测的要小。它阻止严重新冠肺炎的能力比最初宣布的要小得多，药物标签将警告严重的安全问题，包括潜在的出生缺陷。</blockquote></p><p> The Food and Drug Administration authorized Merck’s drug for adults with early symptoms of COVID-19 who face the highest risks of hospitalization, including older people and those with conditions like obesity and heart disease. The U.K. first authorized the pill in early November.</p><p><blockquote>美国食品和药物管理局批准默克公司的药物用于患有COVID-19早期症状且住院风险最高的成年人，包括老年人以及患有肥胖症和心脏病等疾病的人。英国于11月初首次批准了该药物。</blockquote></p><p> Known as molnupiravir, the Merck drug will carry a warning against use during pregnancy. Women of childbearing age should use birth control during treatment and for a few days after while men should use birth control for at least three months after their final dose, the FDA said.</p><p><blockquote>默克公司的这种药物被称为molnupiravir，将带有禁止在怀孕期间使用的警告。FDA表示，育龄妇女应在治疗期间和治疗后几天内采取避孕措施，而男性应在最后一次给药后至少三个月内采取避孕措施。</blockquote></p><p> The restrictions were expected after an FDA advisory panel only narrowly endorsed the drug last month, warning that its use would have to be strictly tailored to patients who can benefit the most.</p><p><blockquote>FDA顾问小组上个月仅以微弱优势批准了该药物，并警告称其使用必须严格针对能够受益最大的患者，因此这些限制是意料之中的。</blockquote></p><p> The Pfizer pill works differently and doesn’t carry the same risks. Additionally, Pfizer’s drug was roughly three times more effective in testing, reducing hospitalization and death by nearly 90% among high-risk patients, compared with 30% for Merck’s.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞药丸的作用方式不同，也没有同样的风险。此外，辉瑞的药物在测试中的有效性大约是三倍，将高危患者的住院和死亡人数减少了近90%，而默克的药物减少了30%。</blockquote></p><p> Some experts question whether there will be much of a role for the Merck drug in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>一些专家质疑默克公司的药物在美国是否会发挥很大作用。</blockquote></p><p> “To the extent that there’s an ample supply of Pfizer’s pill, I think it won’t be used,” said Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic, referring to the Merck drug. “There would be no reason, given it has less efficacy and a higher risk of side effects.”</p><p><blockquote>梅奥诊所的格雷戈里·波兰博士在谈到默克公司的药物时说：“如果辉瑞公司的药物供应充足，我认为它不会被使用。”“没有理由，因为它的功效较低且副作用风险较高。”</blockquote></p><p> For now, the FDA decision provides another potential option against the virus that has killed more than 800,000 Americans, even as health officials brace for record-setting cases, hospitalizations and deaths driven by the omicron variant. Antiviral pills, including Merck’s, are expected to be effective against omicron because they don’t target the spike protein where most of the variant’s worrisome mutations reside.</p><p><blockquote>目前，FDA的决定为对抗已导致超过80万美国人死亡的病毒提供了另一种潜在选择，尽管卫生官员正在为奥密克戎变种导致的创纪录病例、住院和死亡做好准备。包括默克公司在内的抗病毒药物预计对奥密克戎病毒有效，因为它们不针对该变种大多数令人担忧的突变所在的刺突蛋白。</blockquote></p><p> The FDA based its decision on results showing nearly 7% of patients taking the drug ended up in the hospital and one died at the end of 30 days. That compared with 10% of patients hospitalized who were taking the placebo and nine deaths.</p><p><blockquote>FDA的决定是基于结果显示，近7%服用该药物的患者最终住院，其中一人在30天后死亡。相比之下，服用安慰剂的住院患者比例为10%，死亡人数为9人。</blockquote></p><p> Federal officials have agreed to purchase enough of the drug to treat 3.1 million people.</p><p><blockquote>联邦官员已同意购买足够治疗310万人的药物。</blockquote></p><p> The U.S. will pay about $700 for each course of Merck’s drug, which requires patients to take four pills twice a day for five days. A review by Harvard University and King’s College London estimated it costs about $18 to make each 40-pill course of treatment.</p><p><blockquote>美国将为默克公司的每个疗程支付约700美元，该疗程要求患者每天两次服用四粒药丸，持续五天。哈佛大学和伦敦国王学院的一项审查估计，每个40片疗程的费用约为18美元。</blockquote></p><p> Merck’s drug inserts tiny errors into the coronavirus’ genetic code to slow its reproduction. That genetic effect has raised concerns that the drug could cause mutations in human fetuses and even spur more virulent strains of the virus. But FDA scientists said the variant risk is largely theoretical because people take the drug for such a short period of time.</p><p><blockquote>默克公司的药物在冠状病毒的遗传密码中插入微小错误，以减缓其繁殖。这种遗传效应引发了人们的担忧，即该药物可能会导致人类胎儿发生突变，甚至刺激更强的病毒株。但FDA科学家表示，变异风险很大程度上是理论上的，因为人们服用这种药物的时间很短。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1640271591192","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. adds Merck pill as 2nd easy-to-use drug against COVID-19<blockquote>美国将默克药丸作为第二种易于使用的抗COVID-19药物</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. adds Merck pill as 2nd easy-to-use drug against COVID-19<blockquote>美国将默克药丸作为第二种易于使用的抗COVID-19药物</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">SeattleTimes</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-23 22:31</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. health regulators on Thursday authorized the second pill against COVID-19, providing another easy-to-use medication to battle the rising tide of omicron infections.</p><p><blockquote>美国卫生监管机构周四批准了第二种针对COVID-19的药物，提供了另一种易于使用的药物来对抗不断上升的奥密克戎感染浪潮。</blockquote></p><p> The Food and Drug Administration authorization of Merck’s molnupiravir comes one day after the agency cleared a competing drug from Pfizer. That pill, Paxlovid, is likely to become the first-choice treatment against the virus, thanks to its superior benefits and milder side effects.</p><p><blockquote>美国食品和药物管理局批准默克公司的molnupiravir的一天前，该机构批准了辉瑞公司的一种竞争药物。这种名为Paxlovid的药物很可能成为针对该病毒的首选治疗方法，因为它具有优越的益处和较温和的副作用。</blockquote></p><p> As a result, Merck’s pill is expected to have a smaller role against the pandemic than predicted just a few weeks ago. Its ability to head off severe COVID-19 is much smaller than initially announced and the drug label will warn of serious safety issues, including the potential for birth defects.</p><p><blockquote>因此，默克公司的药物预计对疫情的作用将比几周前预测的要小。它阻止严重新冠肺炎的能力比最初宣布的要小得多，药物标签将警告严重的安全问题，包括潜在的出生缺陷。</blockquote></p><p> The Food and Drug Administration authorized Merck’s drug for adults with early symptoms of COVID-19 who face the highest risks of hospitalization, including older people and those with conditions like obesity and heart disease. The U.K. first authorized the pill in early November.</p><p><blockquote>美国食品和药物管理局批准默克公司的药物用于患有COVID-19早期症状且住院风险最高的成年人，包括老年人以及患有肥胖症和心脏病等疾病的人。英国于11月初首次批准了该药物。</blockquote></p><p> Known as molnupiravir, the Merck drug will carry a warning against use during pregnancy. Women of childbearing age should use birth control during treatment and for a few days after while men should use birth control for at least three months after their final dose, the FDA said.</p><p><blockquote>默克公司的这种药物被称为molnupiravir，将带有禁止在怀孕期间使用的警告。FDA表示，育龄妇女应在治疗期间和治疗后几天内采取避孕措施，而男性应在最后一次给药后至少三个月内采取避孕措施。</blockquote></p><p> The restrictions were expected after an FDA advisory panel only narrowly endorsed the drug last month, warning that its use would have to be strictly tailored to patients who can benefit the most.</p><p><blockquote>FDA顾问小组上个月仅以微弱优势批准了该药物，并警告称其使用必须严格针对能够受益最大的患者，因此这些限制是意料之中的。</blockquote></p><p> The Pfizer pill works differently and doesn’t carry the same risks. Additionally, Pfizer’s drug was roughly three times more effective in testing, reducing hospitalization and death by nearly 90% among high-risk patients, compared with 30% for Merck’s.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞药丸的作用方式不同，也没有同样的风险。此外，辉瑞的药物在测试中的有效性大约是三倍，将高危患者的住院和死亡人数减少了近90%，而默克的药物减少了30%。</blockquote></p><p> Some experts question whether there will be much of a role for the Merck drug in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>一些专家质疑默克公司的药物在美国是否会发挥很大作用。</blockquote></p><p> “To the extent that there’s an ample supply of Pfizer’s pill, I think it won’t be used,” said Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic, referring to the Merck drug. “There would be no reason, given it has less efficacy and a higher risk of side effects.”</p><p><blockquote>梅奥诊所的格雷戈里·波兰博士在谈到默克公司的药物时说：“如果辉瑞公司的药物供应充足，我认为它不会被使用。”“没有理由，因为它的功效较低且副作用风险较高。”</blockquote></p><p> For now, the FDA decision provides another potential option against the virus that has killed more than 800,000 Americans, even as health officials brace for record-setting cases, hospitalizations and deaths driven by the omicron variant. Antiviral pills, including Merck’s, are expected to be effective against omicron because they don’t target the spike protein where most of the variant’s worrisome mutations reside.</p><p><blockquote>目前，FDA的决定为对抗已导致超过80万美国人死亡的病毒提供了另一种潜在选择，尽管卫生官员正在为奥密克戎变种导致的创纪录病例、住院和死亡做好准备。包括默克公司在内的抗病毒药物预计对奥密克戎病毒有效，因为它们不针对该变种大多数令人担忧的突变所在的刺突蛋白。</blockquote></p><p> The FDA based its decision on results showing nearly 7% of patients taking the drug ended up in the hospital and one died at the end of 30 days. That compared with 10% of patients hospitalized who were taking the placebo and nine deaths.</p><p><blockquote>FDA的决定是基于结果显示，近7%服用该药物的患者最终住院，其中一人在30天后死亡。相比之下，服用安慰剂的住院患者比例为10%，死亡人数为9人。</blockquote></p><p> Federal officials have agreed to purchase enough of the drug to treat 3.1 million people.</p><p><blockquote>联邦官员已同意购买足够治疗310万人的药物。</blockquote></p><p> The U.S. will pay about $700 for each course of Merck’s drug, which requires patients to take four pills twice a day for five days. A review by Harvard University and King’s College London estimated it costs about $18 to make each 40-pill course of treatment.</p><p><blockquote>美国将为默克公司的每个疗程支付约700美元，该疗程要求患者每天两次服用四粒药丸，持续五天。哈佛大学和伦敦国王学院的一项审查估计，每个40片疗程的费用约为18美元。</blockquote></p><p> Merck’s drug inserts tiny errors into the coronavirus’ genetic code to slow its reproduction. That genetic effect has raised concerns that the drug could cause mutations in human fetuses and even spur more virulent strains of the virus. But FDA scientists said the variant risk is largely theoretical because people take the drug for such a short period of time.</p><p><blockquote>默克公司的药物在冠状病毒的遗传密码中插入微小错误，以减缓其繁殖。这种遗传效应引发了人们的担忧，即该药物可能会导致人类胎儿发生突变，甚至刺激更强的病毒株。但FDA科学家表示，变异风险很大程度上是理论上的，因为人们服用这种药物的时间很短。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.seattletimes.com/business/us-adds-merck-pill-as-2nd-easy-to-use-drug-against-covid-19/\">SeattleTimes</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PFE":"辉瑞","MRK":"默沙东"},"source_url":"https://www.seattletimes.com/business/us-adds-merck-pill-as-2nd-easy-to-use-drug-against-covid-19/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192623075","content_text":"U.S. health regulators on Thursday authorized the second pill against COVID-19, providing another easy-to-use medication to battle the rising tide of omicron infections.\nThe Food and Drug Administration authorization of Merck’s molnupiravir comes one day after the agency cleared a competing drug from Pfizer. That pill, Paxlovid, is likely to become the first-choice treatment against the virus, thanks to its superior benefits and milder side effects.\nAs a result, Merck’s pill is expected to have a smaller role against the pandemic than predicted just a few weeks ago. Its ability to head off severe COVID-19 is much smaller than initially announced and the drug label will warn of serious safety issues, including the potential for birth defects.\nThe Food and Drug Administration authorized Merck’s drug for adults with early symptoms of COVID-19 who face the highest risks of hospitalization, including older people and those with conditions like obesity and heart disease. The U.K. first authorized the pill in early November.\nKnown as molnupiravir, the Merck drug will carry a warning against use during pregnancy. Women of childbearing age should use birth control during treatment and for a few days after while men should use birth control for at least three months after their final dose, the FDA said.\nThe restrictions were expected after an FDA advisory panel only narrowly endorsed the drug last month, warning that its use would have to be strictly tailored to patients who can benefit the most.\nThe Pfizer pill works differently and doesn’t carry the same risks. Additionally, Pfizer’s drug was roughly three times more effective in testing, reducing hospitalization and death by nearly 90% among high-risk patients, compared with 30% for Merck’s.\nSome experts question whether there will be much of a role for the Merck drug in the U.S.\n“To the extent that there’s an ample supply of Pfizer’s pill, I think it won’t be used,” said Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic, referring to the Merck drug. “There would be no reason, given it has less efficacy and a higher risk of side effects.”\nFor now, the FDA decision provides another potential option against the virus that has killed more than 800,000 Americans, even as health officials brace for record-setting cases, hospitalizations and deaths driven by the omicron variant. Antiviral pills, including Merck’s, are expected to be effective against omicron because they don’t target the spike protein where most of the variant’s worrisome mutations reside.\nThe FDA based its decision on results showing nearly 7% of patients taking the drug ended up in the hospital and one died at the end of 30 days. That compared with 10% of patients hospitalized who were taking the placebo and nine deaths.\nFederal officials have agreed to purchase enough of the drug to treat 3.1 million people.\nThe U.S. will pay about $700 for each course of Merck’s drug, which requires patients to take four pills twice a day for five days. A review by Harvard University and King’s College London estimated it costs about $18 to make each 40-pill course of treatment.\nMerck’s drug inserts tiny errors into the coronavirus’ genetic code to slow its reproduction. That genetic effect has raised concerns that the drug could cause mutations in human fetuses and even spur more virulent strains of the virus. But FDA scientists said the variant risk is largely theoretical because people take the drug for such a short period of time.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MRK":0.9,"PFE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2426,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691901218,"gmtCreate":1640105487937,"gmtModify":1640105488079,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691901218","repostId":"2193615778","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699558979,"gmtCreate":1639848948797,"gmtModify":1639848948938,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699558979","repostId":"2192754259","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3113,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699978086,"gmtCreate":1639744273350,"gmtModify":1639744273494,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699978086","repostId":"1168257220","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168257220","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639744121,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1168257220?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 20:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168257220","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropp","content":"<p><div> Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropped 0.4% to $399.00 in pre-market trading. JP Morgan cut the price target on Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Piper Sandler将埃森哲公司(NYSE：ACN)的目标价从354美元上调至433美元。埃森哲股价在盘前交易中下跌0.4%，至399.00美元。摩根大通下调美敦力公司（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MDT）的目标价...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-17 20:28</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropped 0.4% to $399.00 in pre-market trading. JP Morgan cut the price target on Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Piper Sandler将埃森哲公司(NYSE：ACN)的目标价从354美元上调至433美元。埃森哲股价在盘前交易中下跌0.4%，至399.00美元。摩根大通下调美敦力公司（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MDT）的目标价...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ADBE":"Adobe","ACN":"埃森哲","SBUX":"星巴克"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168257220","content_text":"Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropped 0.4% to $399.00 in pre-market trading.\nJP Morgan cut the price target on Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) from $130 to $105. Medtronic shares fell 0.9% to $101.26 in pre-market trading.\nRaymond James lifted the price target on Jabil Inc.(NYSE:JBL) from $70 to $80. Jabil shares fell 0.4% to $64.20 in pre-market trading.\nBMO Capital lowered the price target on T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.(NASDAQ:TROW) from $253 to $246. T. Rowe Price shares rose 1.2% to $192.99 in pre-market trading.\nBaird reduced the price target for Starbucks Corporation(NASDAQ:SBUX) from $126 to $116. Starbucks shares dropped 1.7% to $111.71 in pre-market trading.\nSVB Leerink raised Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(NASDAQ:ZNTL) price target from $89 to $97. Zentalis Pharmaceuticals shares fell 3.4% to $76.57 in pre-market trading.\nPiper Sandler cut Adobe Inc.(NASDAQ:ADBE) price target from $670 to $630. Adobe shares fell 0.8% to $561.80 in pre-market trading.\nKeybanc reduced the price target for Generac Holdings Inc.(NYSE:GNRC) from $540 to $500. Generac Holdings shares rose 3% to $360.40 in pre-market trading.\nNeedham cut Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc(NASDAQ:JAZZ) price target from $220 to $215. Jazz Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.4% to $124.00 in pre-market trading.\nJP Morgan boosted Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(NYSE:CMG) price target from $1,710 to $1,750. Chipotle shares fell 1.3% to close at $1,678.97 on Thursday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ADBE":0.9,"SBUX":0.9,"ACN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690683296,"gmtCreate":1639663750287,"gmtModify":1639663750461,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690683296","repostId":"1142996286","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142996286","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639659703,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1142996286?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 21:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Thursday<blockquote>周四美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142996286","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after the market staged a U-turn the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.$Delta Air Lines$ – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-","content":"<p>U.S.&nbsp;stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after&nbsp;the market staged a U-turn&nbsp;the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周四上午上涨，此前市场在前一交易日出现180度大转弯，欢迎美联储决定加快缩减规模并暂时维持利率不变。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 204 points, or 0.57%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 31.25 points, or 0.66%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 115.25 points, or 0.71%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e8a71c62338c2a045263d40bb9c86e4\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"368\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">With the Fed giving markets a breather Wednesday, traders will turn their Thursday to&nbsp;fresh Labor Department data on initial weekly jobless claims. First-time unemployment filings are expected to reflect a slight increase after&nbsp;last’s 52-week low.</p><p><blockquote>截至美国东部时间上午8:00，道指e-mini上涨204点，涨幅0.57%，标普500 e-mini上涨31.25点，涨幅0.66%，纳斯达克100 e-mini上涨115.25点，涨幅0.71%。随着美联储周三给市场喘息的机会，交易员将在周四转向劳工部关于每周首次申请失业救济人数的最新数据。首次申请失业救济人数预计将在去年创下52周低点后小幅上升。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">Delta Air Lines</a></b> – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-pandemic profit levels.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">达美航空</a></b>-达美航空预计第四季度利润为2亿美元，盘前上涨2.3%。市场普遍预测达美航空将出现季度亏损，但该航空公司表示，假期需求强劲，利润有望超过大流行前的水平。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">Accenture PLC</a></b> – The consulting firm’s shares surged 6.7% in the premarket after it reported better-than-expected profit and revenue for its latest quarter, and raised its earnings guidance for fiscal 2022. Revenue rose by more than 20% across the four biggest industry groups in Accenture’s customer base.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">埃森哲公司</a></b>-该咨询公司公布最新季度利润和收入好于预期，并上调2022财年盈利指引后，其股价盘前飙升6.7%。埃森哲客户群中四个最大行业集团的收入增长了20%以上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – The drugmaker’s shares declined 1% in premarket trading after it said its antibody cocktail loses potency against the omicron Covid-19 variant. Regeneron did say that the cocktail is effective against the delta variant.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">再生元制药</a></b>-该制药商表示其抗体鸡尾酒对奥密克戎Covid-19变种失去效力后，其股价在盘前交易中下跌1%。再生元确实说过这种鸡尾酒对德尔塔变异毒株有效。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">Lennar</a></b> – Lennar reported quarterly earnings of $3.91 per share, below the $4.15 consensus estimate, and the homebuilder’s revenue also fell short of forecasts. Lennar was hurt by higher lumber costs as well as increased labor costs and shortages of raw materials, resulting in delayed home deliveries. Lennar tumbled 6.3% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">伦纳尔</a></b>-Lennar公布的季度收益为每股3.91美元，低于市场普遍预期的4.15美元，该住宅建筑商的收入也低于预期。Lennar受到木材成本上涨、劳动力成本增加和原材料短缺的影响，导致送货上门延迟。Lennar在盘前下跌6.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">Novartis AG</a></b> – Novartis launched a new share buyback program worth up to $15 billion, with the drug maker planning to complete those repurchases by the end of 2023. Shares jumped 4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">诺华公司</a></b>-诺华启动了一项价值高达150亿美元的新股票回购计划，该制药商计划在2023年底前完成这些回购。股价在盘前交易中上涨4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a>&nbsp;</b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> rose 1.1% in the premarket after announcing that it added $12 billion to its share buyback program, bringing the total amount of its repurchase authority to $13.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a> </b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a>盘前股价上涨1.1%，此前该公司宣布向其股票回购计划增加120亿美元，使其回购授权总额达到132亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker's</a> </b>– Smucker struck a deal to sell its natural beverage and grains businesses to private equity firm Nexus Capital Management for $110 million, with the food producer saying it wanted to focus more resources on its core brands.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker的</a></b>-Smucker达成协议，以1.1亿美元的价格将其天然饮料和谷物业务出售给私募股权公司Nexus Capital Management，这家食品生产商表示希望将更多资源集中在其核心品牌上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> was added to the “conviction buy” list at Goldman Sachs, which points to the company’s pending launch of a new surgical system. Shares added 1.2% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a></b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a>被添加到高盛的“坚定买入”名单中，这表明该公司即将推出一种新的手术系统。盘前股价上涨1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T Inc</a> </b>– Morgan Stanley upgraded AT&amp;T to “overweight” from “equal-weight,” saying a recent slide by the stock creates an attractive risk-reward profile. The firm said there are several other key factors driving the upgrade, including the pending completion of the WarnerMedia/Discoverymerger. AT&amp;T gained 1.5% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T公司</a></b>-摩根士丹利将AT&amp;T的评级从“同等权重”上调至“跑赢大盘”，称该股近期的下滑创造了有吸引力的风险回报状况。该公司表示，还有其他几个关键因素推动了此次升级，包括WarnerMedia/Discovery合并即将完成。AT&amp;T在盘前交易中上涨1.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.</a> </b>– The pet products seller’s stock added 1.9% in the premarket after Needham began coverage with a “buy” rating. The firm feels Petco should outperform competitors in the pet category, given its presence in multiple channels including veterinary hospitals.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco健康和保健公司。</a></b>-在Needham开始给予“买入”评级后，这家宠物产品销售商的股价在盘前上涨了1.9%。该公司认为，鉴于Petco在包括兽医医院在内的多个渠道中的存在，它应该会超越宠物类别的竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a> </b>– The e-commerce platform operator rallied 2.9% in premarket trading after Evercore upgraded it to “outperform” from “in line.” Evercore noted that the stock is about 20% below its year highs and that the company represents a high-quality asset in terms of growth opportunities.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a></b>–Evercore将其评级从“持平”上调至“跑赢大盘”后，该电子商务平台运营商在盘前交易中上涨2.9%。Evercore指出，该股比年度高点低约20%，就增长机会而言，该公司代表着优质资产。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Thursday<blockquote>周四美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Thursday<blockquote>周四美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-16 21:01</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S.&nbsp;stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after&nbsp;the market staged a U-turn&nbsp;the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周四上午上涨，此前市场在前一交易日出现180度大转弯，欢迎美联储决定加快缩减规模并暂时维持利率不变。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 204 points, or 0.57%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 31.25 points, or 0.66%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 115.25 points, or 0.71%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e8a71c62338c2a045263d40bb9c86e4\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"368\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">With the Fed giving markets a breather Wednesday, traders will turn their Thursday to&nbsp;fresh Labor Department data on initial weekly jobless claims. First-time unemployment filings are expected to reflect a slight increase after&nbsp;last’s 52-week low.</p><p><blockquote>截至美国东部时间上午8:00，道指e-mini上涨204点，涨幅0.57%，标普500 e-mini上涨31.25点，涨幅0.66%，纳斯达克100 e-mini上涨115.25点，涨幅0.71%。随着美联储周三给市场喘息的机会，交易员将在周四转向劳工部关于每周首次申请失业救济人数的最新数据。首次申请失业救济人数预计将在去年创下52周低点后小幅上升。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">Delta Air Lines</a></b> – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-pandemic profit levels.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">达美航空</a></b>-达美航空预计第四季度利润为2亿美元，盘前上涨2.3%。市场普遍预测达美航空将出现季度亏损，但该航空公司表示，假期需求强劲，利润有望超过大流行前的水平。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">Accenture PLC</a></b> – The consulting firm’s shares surged 6.7% in the premarket after it reported better-than-expected profit and revenue for its latest quarter, and raised its earnings guidance for fiscal 2022. Revenue rose by more than 20% across the four biggest industry groups in Accenture’s customer base.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">埃森哲公司</a></b>-该咨询公司公布最新季度利润和收入好于预期，并上调2022财年盈利指引后，其股价盘前飙升6.7%。埃森哲客户群中四个最大行业集团的收入增长了20%以上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – The drugmaker’s shares declined 1% in premarket trading after it said its antibody cocktail loses potency against the omicron Covid-19 variant. Regeneron did say that the cocktail is effective against the delta variant.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">再生元制药</a></b>-该制药商表示其抗体鸡尾酒对奥密克戎Covid-19变种失去效力后，其股价在盘前交易中下跌1%。再生元确实说过这种鸡尾酒对德尔塔变异毒株有效。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">Lennar</a></b> – Lennar reported quarterly earnings of $3.91 per share, below the $4.15 consensus estimate, and the homebuilder’s revenue also fell short of forecasts. Lennar was hurt by higher lumber costs as well as increased labor costs and shortages of raw materials, resulting in delayed home deliveries. Lennar tumbled 6.3% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">伦纳尔</a></b>-Lennar公布的季度收益为每股3.91美元，低于市场普遍预期的4.15美元，该住宅建筑商的收入也低于预期。Lennar受到木材成本上涨、劳动力成本增加和原材料短缺的影响，导致送货上门延迟。Lennar在盘前下跌6.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">Novartis AG</a></b> – Novartis launched a new share buyback program worth up to $15 billion, with the drug maker planning to complete those repurchases by the end of 2023. Shares jumped 4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">诺华公司</a></b>-诺华启动了一项价值高达150亿美元的新股票回购计划，该制药商计划在2023年底前完成这些回购。股价在盘前交易中上涨4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a>&nbsp;</b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> rose 1.1% in the premarket after announcing that it added $12 billion to its share buyback program, bringing the total amount of its repurchase authority to $13.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a> </b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a>盘前股价上涨1.1%，此前该公司宣布向其股票回购计划增加120亿美元，使其回购授权总额达到132亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker's</a> </b>– Smucker struck a deal to sell its natural beverage and grains businesses to private equity firm Nexus Capital Management for $110 million, with the food producer saying it wanted to focus more resources on its core brands.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker的</a></b>-Smucker达成协议，以1.1亿美元的价格将其天然饮料和谷物业务出售给私募股权公司Nexus Capital Management，这家食品生产商表示希望将更多资源集中在其核心品牌上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> was added to the “conviction buy” list at Goldman Sachs, which points to the company’s pending launch of a new surgical system. Shares added 1.2% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a></b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a>被添加到高盛的“坚定买入”名单中，这表明该公司即将推出一种新的手术系统。盘前股价上涨1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T Inc</a> </b>– Morgan Stanley upgraded AT&amp;T to “overweight” from “equal-weight,” saying a recent slide by the stock creates an attractive risk-reward profile. The firm said there are several other key factors driving the upgrade, including the pending completion of the WarnerMedia/Discoverymerger. AT&amp;T gained 1.5% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T公司</a></b>-摩根士丹利将AT&amp;T的评级从“同等权重”上调至“跑赢大盘”，称该股近期的下滑创造了有吸引力的风险回报状况。该公司表示，还有其他几个关键因素推动了此次升级，包括WarnerMedia/Discovery合并即将完成。AT&amp;T在盘前交易中上涨1.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.</a> </b>– The pet products seller’s stock added 1.9% in the premarket after Needham began coverage with a “buy” rating. The firm feels Petco should outperform competitors in the pet category, given its presence in multiple channels including veterinary hospitals.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco健康和保健公司。</a></b>-在Needham开始给予“买入”评级后，这家宠物产品销售商的股价在盘前上涨了1.9%。该公司认为，鉴于Petco在包括兽医医院在内的多个渠道中的存在，它应该会超越宠物类别的竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a> </b>– The e-commerce platform operator rallied 2.9% in premarket trading after Evercore upgraded it to “outperform” from “in line.” Evercore noted that the stock is about 20% below its year highs and that the company represents a high-quality asset in terms of growth opportunities.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a></b>–Evercore将其评级从“持平”上调至“跑赢大盘”后，该电子商务平台运营商在盘前交易中上涨2.9%。Evercore指出，该股比年度高点低约20%，就增长机会而言，该公司代表着优质资产。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142996286","content_text":"U.S. stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after the market staged a U-turn the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.\nAt 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 204 points, or 0.57%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 31.25 points, or 0.66%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 115.25 points, or 0.71%.With the Fed giving markets a breather Wednesday, traders will turn their Thursday to fresh Labor Department data on initial weekly jobless claims. First-time unemployment filings are expected to reflect a slight increase after last’s 52-week low.\nStocks making the biggest moves premarket: \nDelta Air Lines – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-pandemic profit levels.\nAccenture PLC – The consulting firm’s shares surged 6.7% in the premarket after it reported better-than-expected profit and revenue for its latest quarter, and raised its earnings guidance for fiscal 2022. Revenue rose by more than 20% across the four biggest industry groups in Accenture’s customer base.\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals – The drugmaker’s shares declined 1% in premarket trading after it said its antibody cocktail loses potency against the omicron Covid-19 variant. Regeneron did say that the cocktail is effective against the delta variant.\nLennar – Lennar reported quarterly earnings of $3.91 per share, below the $4.15 consensus estimate, and the homebuilder’s revenue also fell short of forecasts. Lennar was hurt by higher lumber costs as well as increased labor costs and shortages of raw materials, resulting in delayed home deliveries. Lennar tumbled 6.3% in premarket action.\nNovartis AG – Novartis launched a new share buyback program worth up to $15 billion, with the drug maker planning to complete those repurchases by the end of 2023. Shares jumped 4% in premarket trading.\nVisa – Visa rose 1.1% in the premarket after announcing that it added $12 billion to its share buyback program, bringing the total amount of its repurchase authority to $13.2 billion.\nSmucker's – Smucker struck a deal to sell its natural beverage and grains businesses to private equity firm Nexus Capital Management for $110 million, with the food producer saying it wanted to focus more resources on its core brands.\nIntuitive Surgical – Intuitive Surgical was added to the “conviction buy” list at Goldman Sachs, which points to the company’s pending launch of a new surgical system. Shares added 1.2% in the premarket.\nAT&T Inc – Morgan Stanley upgraded AT&T to “overweight” from “equal-weight,” saying a recent slide by the stock creates an attractive risk-reward profile. The firm said there are several other key factors driving the upgrade, including the pending completion of the WarnerMedia/Discoverymerger. AT&T gained 1.5% in premarket trading.\nPetco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. – The pet products seller’s stock added 1.9% in the premarket after Needham began coverage with a “buy” rating. The firm feels Petco should outperform competitors in the pet category, given its presence in multiple channels including veterinary hospitals.\nShopify – The e-commerce platform operator rallied 2.9% in premarket trading after Evercore upgraded it to “outperform” from “in line.” Evercore noted that the stock is about 20% below its year highs and that the company represents a high-quality asset in terms of growth opportunities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690604037,"gmtCreate":1639660828443,"gmtModify":1639660852435,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690604037","repostId":"1191683541","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191683541","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639658241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1191683541?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 20:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191683541","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc.. from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading.RBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc. from $195 to $175. Airbnb shares rose 0.3% to $168.62 in pre-market trading.Morgan Stanley lowered DocuSign, Inc. price target from $350 to $165. DocuSign shares dropped 2.4% to $147.51 in pre-market trading.Barclays cut the price target on Aptiv PLC from $212 to $200. Aptiv shares rose 2.7% to $168.91 in pre-market","content":"<p><div> Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc..(NYSE:UAA) from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading. RBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc.(NASDAQ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Stifel将Under Armour，Inc.（纽约证券交易所代码：UAA）的目标价从30美元下调至24美元。Under Armour股价在盘前交易中下跌0.7%，至22.22美元。加拿大皇家银行资本下调了Airbnb，Inc.（纳斯达克...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-16 20:37</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc..(NYSE:UAA) from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading. RBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc.(NASDAQ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Stifel将Under Armour，Inc.（纽约证券交易所代码：UAA）的目标价从30美元下调至24美元。Under Armour股价在盘前交易中下跌0.7%，至22.22美元。加拿大皇家银行资本下调了Airbnb，Inc.（纳斯达克...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"T":"At&T","DOCU":"Docusign","ABNB":"爱彼迎"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191683541","content_text":"Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc..(NYSE:UAA) from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading.\nRBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc.(NASDAQ:ABNB) from $195 to $175. Airbnb shares rose 0.3% to $168.62 in pre-market trading.\nMorgan Stanley cut AT&T Inc.(NYSE:T) price target from $32 to $28. AT&T shares rose 1.7% to $22.55 in pre-market trading.\nMorgan Stanley lowered DocuSign, Inc.(NASDAQ:DOCU) price target from $350 to $165. DocuSign shares dropped 2.4% to $147.51 in pre-market trading.\nBarclays cut the price target on Aptiv PLC(NYSE:APTV) from $212 to $200. Aptiv shares rose 2.7% to $168.91 in pre-market trading.\nRaymond James raised The Progressive Corporation(NYSE:PGR) price target from $105 to $110. Progressive shares rose 4.8% to close at $101.81 on Wednesday.\nWells Fargo boosted the price target for Magna International Inc.(NYSE:MGA) from $84 to $93. Magna International shares rose 1.7% to $79.04 in pre-market trading.\nB of A Securities reduced the price target for Wayfair Inc.(NYSE:W) from $265 to $175. Wayfair shares dropped 2.4% to $202.28 in pre-market trading.\nHC Wainwright & Co. cut IGM Biosciences, Inc.(NASDAQ:IGMS) price target from $114 to $76. IGM Biosciences shares fell 0.1% to close at $28.35 on Wednesday.\nNeedham cut Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) price target from $145 to $131. Medtronic shares rose 0.1% to $105.01 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DOCU":0.9,"ABNB":0.9,"T":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":926,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607169495,"gmtCreate":1639498661271,"gmtModify":1639498661430,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607169495","repostId":"2191581609","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1083,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604583533,"gmtCreate":1639411557314,"gmtModify":1639412696362,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604583533","repostId":"1171271872","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171271872","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639348466,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1171271872?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 06:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Rivian,Adobe,FedEx,Lennar,Campbell Soup,and Other Stocks to Watch This Week<blockquote>Rivian、Adobe、联邦快递、Lennar、金宝汤等本周值得关注的股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171271872","media":"Barrons","summary":"The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential announcement of plans to accelerate monthly asset purchase tapering.The Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday.Earnings reports this week are few, but will include Campbell Soup on Tuesday;Lennar,Accenture,FedEx,Rivian Automotive, and Adobe on Thursday; and","content":"<p>The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s&nbsp;last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential announcement of plans to accelerate monthly asset purchase tapering.</p><p><blockquote>本周投资者的主要事件将是美联储利率制定委员会2021年的最后一次会议。官员们最近的评论更加鹰派，可能会宣布加速每月资产购买缩减的计划。</blockquote></p><p> The Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>联邦公开市场委员会为期两天的会议将于周二和周三举行。</blockquote></p><p> Earnings reports this week are few, but will include&nbsp;Campbell Soup&nbsp;on Tuesday;Lennar,Accenture,FedEx,Rivian&nbsp;Automotive, and&nbsp;Adobe&nbsp;on Thursday; and&nbsp;Darden Restaurants&nbsp;on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>本周的财报很少，但周二将包括金宝汤；Lennar、Accenture、FedEx、Rivian汽车和Adobe周四；周五还有达顿餐厅。</blockquote></p><p> Economic data coming out this week includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price index for November on Tuesday. Economists expect a 0.55% month-over-month rise for the headline index and a 0.4% gain for the core PPI. Those would both roughly match October’s pace of producer inflation.</p><p><blockquote>本周公布的经济数据包括美国劳工统计局周二公布的11月份生产者价格指数。经济学家预计整体指数环比上涨0.55%，核心PPI上涨0.4%。这两者都与10月份的生产者通胀速度大致相当。</blockquote></p><p> Other data releases include the National Federation of Independent Businesses’ sentiment&nbsp;index on Tuesday, November retail-sales spending from the Census Bureau on Wednesday, and the November housing starts on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>其他发布的数据包括周二全国独立企业联合会的信心指数、周三人口普查局公布的11月零售支出以及周四公布的11月新屋开工率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Monday 12/13</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期一12/13</b></blockquote></p><p> J.Jill&nbsp;and&nbsp;PHX Minerals&nbsp;host earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>J.Jill和PHX Minerals在评级举办收益会议。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Tuesday 12/14</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期二12/14</b></blockquote></p><p> Campbell Soup, Barnes Group, and&nbsp;Avaya Holdings&nbsp;host investor days.</p><p><blockquote>金宝汤、巴恩斯集团和Avaya Holdings举办投资者日。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Bureau of Labor</b>&nbsp;Statistics releases the producer price index for November. Consensus estimate is for a 0.55% month-over-month rise, and for the core PPI, which excludes food and energy, to gain 0.4%. This compares with increases of 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively, in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>劳工局</b>统计局发布11月份生产者价格指数。市场普遍预计环比上涨0.55%，不包括食品和能源的核心PPI将上涨0.4%。相比之下，10月份的增幅分别为0.6%和0.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The National Federation</b>&nbsp;of Independent Businesses reports its index, which surveys about 5,000 small-business owners across the country, for November. Expectations call for a reading of 98.3, compared with 98.2 in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>全国联合会</b>独立企业报告了11月份的指数，该指数调查了全国约5,000名小企业主。预期看涨期权为98.3，而10月份为98.2。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Wednesday 12/15</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期三12/15</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Open Market Committee</b> concludes its two-day meeting, when policy makers will discuss accelerating the timetable for tapering monthly securities purchases.</p><p><blockquote><b>联邦公开市场委员会</b>结束了为期两天的会议，届时政策制定者将讨论加快缩减月度证券购买的时间表。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The BLS reports</b> export and import price data for November. Expectations are for a 0.5% month-over-month rise in export prices, while import prices are seen increasing 0.5%. This compares with gains of 1.5% and 1.2%, respectively, in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>劳工统计局报告</b>11月进出口价格数据。预计出口价格环比上涨0.5%，而进口价格预计上涨0.5%。相比之下，10月份的涨幅分别为1.5%和1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The National Association</b> of Home Builders releases its NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index for December. Consensus estimate is for an 84 reading, compared with an 83 reading in November. The index peaked at 90 late last year, and home builders remain bullish on the housing market.</p><p><blockquote><b>全国协会</b>房屋建筑商协会发布了12月份NAHB/富国银行住房市场指数。普遍估计读数为84，而11月份的读数为83。该指数去年年底达到90的峰值，房屋建筑商仍然看好房地产市场。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Census Bureau</b> reports on retail-sales spending for November. Expectations are for a seasonally adjusted 0.7% month-over-month increase in retail sales, compared with a 1.7% rise in October. Excluding autos, spending is seen rising 0.8%, compared with 1.7% in the previous period.</p><p><blockquote><b>人口普查局</b>11月份零售支出报告。预计经季节调整后零售额环比增长0.7%，而10月份为增长1.7%。不包括汽车在内，支出预计将增长0.8%，而上一时期为1.7%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Thursday 12/16</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期四12/16</b></blockquote></p><p> Heico,Lennar, Accenture, FedEx, Jabil, Adobe, Rivian Automotive, and Nordson are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>Heico、Lennar、Accenture、FedEx、Jabil、Adobe、Rivian汽车和Nordson等公司在评级举办财报会议。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Census Bureau</b>releases its New Residential Construction report for November. The seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts is expected to be 1.563 million units, compared with 1.52 million in October. A housing start is counted when excavation begins on a home. Permits issued for new-home construction are expected to be 1.655 million, compared with 1.653 million in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>人口普查局</b>发布11月份新的住宅建设报告。季调后成屋开工年率料为156.3万套，10月为152万套。当房屋开始挖掘时，房屋开工被计算在内。新房建设许可证预计为165.5万份，而10月份为165.3万份。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Bank of England</b> announces its interest-rate decision and publishes the minutes of the meeting.</p><p><blockquote><b>英格兰银行</b>宣布利率决定并公布会议记录。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Reserve</b> releases industrial production data for November. Economists are looking for a 0.6% rise, after a 1.6% increase in October. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.8, roughly in line with October’s 76.4%.</p><p><blockquote><b>美联储</b>公布11月份工业生产数据。继10月份增长1.6%后，经济学家预计增长0.6%。产能利用率预计为76.8，与10月份的76.4%大致一致。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Friday 12/17</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期五12/17</b></blockquote></p><p> Steelcase,Darden Restaurants, and&nbsp;Quanex Building Products&nbsp;host earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>Steelcase、Darden Restaurants和Quanex Building Products在评级举办收益会议。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Rivian,Adobe,FedEx,Lennar,Campbell Soup,and Other Stocks to Watch This Week<blockquote>Rivian、Adobe、联邦快递、Lennar、金宝汤等本周值得关注的股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRivian,Adobe,FedEx,Lennar,Campbell Soup,and Other Stocks to Watch This Week<blockquote>Rivian、Adobe、联邦快递、Lennar、金宝汤等本周值得关注的股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-13 06:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s&nbsp;last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential announcement of plans to accelerate monthly asset purchase tapering.</p><p><blockquote>本周投资者的主要事件将是美联储利率制定委员会2021年的最后一次会议。官员们最近的评论更加鹰派，可能会宣布加速每月资产购买缩减的计划。</blockquote></p><p> The Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>联邦公开市场委员会为期两天的会议将于周二和周三举行。</blockquote></p><p> Earnings reports this week are few, but will include&nbsp;Campbell Soup&nbsp;on Tuesday;Lennar,Accenture,FedEx,Rivian&nbsp;Automotive, and&nbsp;Adobe&nbsp;on Thursday; and&nbsp;Darden Restaurants&nbsp;on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>本周的财报很少，但周二将包括金宝汤；Lennar、Accenture、FedEx、Rivian汽车和Adobe周四；周五还有达顿餐厅。</blockquote></p><p> Economic data coming out this week includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price index for November on Tuesday. Economists expect a 0.55% month-over-month rise for the headline index and a 0.4% gain for the core PPI. Those would both roughly match October’s pace of producer inflation.</p><p><blockquote>本周公布的经济数据包括美国劳工统计局周二公布的11月份生产者价格指数。经济学家预计整体指数环比上涨0.55%，核心PPI上涨0.4%。这两者都与10月份的生产者通胀速度大致相当。</blockquote></p><p> Other data releases include the National Federation of Independent Businesses’ sentiment&nbsp;index on Tuesday, November retail-sales spending from the Census Bureau on Wednesday, and the November housing starts on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>其他发布的数据包括周二全国独立企业联合会的信心指数、周三人口普查局公布的11月零售支出以及周四公布的11月新屋开工率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Monday 12/13</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期一12/13</b></blockquote></p><p> J.Jill&nbsp;and&nbsp;PHX Minerals&nbsp;host earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>J.Jill和PHX Minerals在评级举办收益会议。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Tuesday 12/14</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期二12/14</b></blockquote></p><p> Campbell Soup, Barnes Group, and&nbsp;Avaya Holdings&nbsp;host investor days.</p><p><blockquote>金宝汤、巴恩斯集团和Avaya Holdings举办投资者日。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Bureau of Labor</b>&nbsp;Statistics releases the producer price index for November. Consensus estimate is for a 0.55% month-over-month rise, and for the core PPI, which excludes food and energy, to gain 0.4%. This compares with increases of 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively, in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>劳工局</b>统计局发布11月份生产者价格指数。市场普遍预计环比上涨0.55%，不包括食品和能源的核心PPI将上涨0.4%。相比之下，10月份的增幅分别为0.6%和0.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The National Federation</b>&nbsp;of Independent Businesses reports its index, which surveys about 5,000 small-business owners across the country, for November. Expectations call for a reading of 98.3, compared with 98.2 in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>全国联合会</b>独立企业报告了11月份的指数，该指数调查了全国约5,000名小企业主。预期看涨期权为98.3，而10月份为98.2。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Wednesday 12/15</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期三12/15</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Open Market Committee</b> concludes its two-day meeting, when policy makers will discuss accelerating the timetable for tapering monthly securities purchases.</p><p><blockquote><b>联邦公开市场委员会</b>结束了为期两天的会议，届时政策制定者将讨论加快缩减月度证券购买的时间表。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The BLS reports</b> export and import price data for November. Expectations are for a 0.5% month-over-month rise in export prices, while import prices are seen increasing 0.5%. This compares with gains of 1.5% and 1.2%, respectively, in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>劳工统计局报告</b>11月进出口价格数据。预计出口价格环比上涨0.5%，而进口价格预计上涨0.5%。相比之下，10月份的涨幅分别为1.5%和1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The National Association</b> of Home Builders releases its NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index for December. Consensus estimate is for an 84 reading, compared with an 83 reading in November. The index peaked at 90 late last year, and home builders remain bullish on the housing market.</p><p><blockquote><b>全国协会</b>房屋建筑商协会发布了12月份NAHB/富国银行住房市场指数。普遍估计读数为84，而11月份的读数为83。该指数去年年底达到90的峰值，房屋建筑商仍然看好房地产市场。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Census Bureau</b> reports on retail-sales spending for November. Expectations are for a seasonally adjusted 0.7% month-over-month increase in retail sales, compared with a 1.7% rise in October. Excluding autos, spending is seen rising 0.8%, compared with 1.7% in the previous period.</p><p><blockquote><b>人口普查局</b>11月份零售支出报告。预计经季节调整后零售额环比增长0.7%，而10月份为增长1.7%。不包括汽车在内，支出预计将增长0.8%，而上一时期为1.7%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Thursday 12/16</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期四12/16</b></blockquote></p><p> Heico,Lennar, Accenture, FedEx, Jabil, Adobe, Rivian Automotive, and Nordson are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>Heico、Lennar、Accenture、FedEx、Jabil、Adobe、Rivian汽车和Nordson等公司在评级举办财报会议。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Census Bureau</b>releases its New Residential Construction report for November. The seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts is expected to be 1.563 million units, compared with 1.52 million in October. A housing start is counted when excavation begins on a home. Permits issued for new-home construction are expected to be 1.655 million, compared with 1.653 million in October.</p><p><blockquote><b>人口普查局</b>发布11月份新的住宅建设报告。季调后成屋开工年率料为156.3万套，10月为152万套。当房屋开始挖掘时，房屋开工被计算在内。新房建设许可证预计为165.5万份，而10月份为165.3万份。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Bank of England</b> announces its interest-rate decision and publishes the minutes of the meeting.</p><p><blockquote><b>英格兰银行</b>宣布利率决定并公布会议记录。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Reserve</b> releases industrial production data for November. Economists are looking for a 0.6% rise, after a 1.6% increase in October. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.8, roughly in line with October’s 76.4%.</p><p><blockquote><b>美联储</b>公布11月份工业生产数据。继10月份增长1.6%后，经济学家预计增长0.6%。产能利用率预计为76.8，与10月份的76.4%大致一致。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Friday 12/17</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期五12/17</b></blockquote></p><p> Steelcase,Darden Restaurants, and&nbsp;Quanex Building Products&nbsp;host earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>Steelcase、Darden Restaurants和Quanex Building Products在评级举办收益会议。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-to-watch-this-week-fedex-rivian-lennar-campbell-adobe-51639330550?mod=hp_LEAD_3\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CPB":"金宝汤","DRI":"达登饭店","FDX":"联邦快递","LEN":"莱纳建筑公司","ACN":"埃森哲","HEI":"海科航空","SCS":"Steelcase Inc.",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","JILL":"J.Jill Inc.","RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.",".DJI":"道琼斯","PHX":"潘汉德尔油气","ADBE":"Adobe",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-to-watch-this-week-fedex-rivian-lennar-campbell-adobe-51639330550?mod=hp_LEAD_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171271872","content_text":"The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential announcement of plans to accelerate monthly asset purchase tapering.\nThe Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday.\nEarnings reports this week are few, but will include Campbell Soup on Tuesday;Lennar,Accenture,FedEx,Rivian Automotive, and Adobe on Thursday; and Darden Restaurants on Friday.\nEconomic data coming out this week includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price index for November on Tuesday. Economists expect a 0.55% month-over-month rise for the headline index and a 0.4% gain for the core PPI. Those would both roughly match October’s pace of producer inflation.\nOther data releases include the National Federation of Independent Businesses’ sentiment index on Tuesday, November retail-sales spending from the Census Bureau on Wednesday, and the November housing starts on Thursday.\nMonday 12/13\nJ.Jill and PHX Minerals host earnings conference calls.\nTuesday 12/14\nCampbell Soup, Barnes Group, and Avaya Holdings host investor days.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the producer price index for November. Consensus estimate is for a 0.55% month-over-month rise, and for the core PPI, which excludes food and energy, to gain 0.4%. This compares with increases of 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively, in October.\nThe National Federation of Independent Businesses reports its index, which surveys about 5,000 small-business owners across the country, for November. Expectations call for a reading of 98.3, compared with 98.2 in October.\nWednesday 12/15\nThe Federal Open Market Committee concludes its two-day meeting, when policy makers will discuss accelerating the timetable for tapering monthly securities purchases.\nThe BLS reports export and import price data for November. Expectations are for a 0.5% month-over-month rise in export prices, while import prices are seen increasing 0.5%. This compares with gains of 1.5% and 1.2%, respectively, in October.\nThe National Association of Home Builders releases its NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index for December. Consensus estimate is for an 84 reading, compared with an 83 reading in November. The index peaked at 90 late last year, and home builders remain bullish on the housing market.\nThe Census Bureau reports on retail-sales spending for November. Expectations are for a seasonally adjusted 0.7% month-over-month increase in retail sales, compared with a 1.7% rise in October. Excluding autos, spending is seen rising 0.8%, compared with 1.7% in the previous period.\nThursday 12/16\nHeico,Lennar, Accenture, FedEx, Jabil, Adobe, Rivian Automotive, and Nordson are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.\nThe Census Bureaureleases its New Residential Construction report for November. The seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts is expected to be 1.563 million units, compared with 1.52 million in October. A housing start is counted when excavation begins on a home. Permits issued for new-home construction are expected to be 1.655 million, compared with 1.653 million in October.\nThe Bank of England announces its interest-rate decision and publishes the minutes of the meeting.\nThe Federal Reserve releases industrial production data for November. Economists are looking for a 0.6% rise, after a 1.6% increase in October. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.8, roughly in line with October’s 76.4%.\nFriday 12/17\nSteelcase,Darden Restaurants, and Quanex Building Products host earnings conference calls.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CPB":0.9,"AVYA":0.9,"PHX":0.9,"ACN":0.9,"DRI":0.9,"SCS":0.9,"FDX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"LEN":0.9,"JILL":0.9,"RIVN":0.9,"ADBE":0.9,"HEI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":940,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605791667,"gmtCreate":1639241517199,"gmtModify":1639241517362,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605791667","repostId":"2190275356","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1273,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":602714272,"gmtCreate":1639066622748,"gmtModify":1639066622911,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602714272","repostId":"1134628800","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134628800","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1639064594,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1134628800?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 23:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134628800","media":"Benzinga","summary":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Edwards Lifesciences Corporation from $130 to $135. Edwards ","content":"<p><ul>  <li>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on&nbsp;<b>Edwards Lifesciences Corporation</b>&nbsp;from $130 to $135. Edwards Lifesciences shares rose 1% to trade at $120.68 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Keybanc raised&nbsp;<b>The Sherwin-Williams Company</b>&nbsp;price target from $350 to $384. Sherwin-Williams shares rose 1% to $345.68 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Piper Sandler cut&nbsp;<b>Udemy, Inc.</b>&nbsp;price target from $37 to $34. Udemy shares fell 2% to trade at $20.65 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Needham lowered the price target on&nbsp;<b>Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.</b>&nbsp;from $20 to $12. Esperion Therapeutics shares dropped 9% to $5.34 on Thursday.</li>  <li>JP Morgan lifted&nbsp;<b>Phillips 66</b>&nbsp;price target from $83 to $93. Phillips 66 shares rose 0.7% to $72.36 on Thursday.</li>  <li>RBC Capital cut the price target for&nbsp;<b>Cincinnati Financial Corporation</b>&nbsp;from $135 to $130. Cincinnati Financial shares fell 1.7% to $115.23 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Chardan Capital raised&nbsp;<b>Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</b>&nbsp;price target from $28 to $38.25. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals shares rose 0.1% to $38.03 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Morgan Stanley boosted the price target on&nbsp;<b>Oshkosh Corporation</b>&nbsp;from $134 to $144. Oshkosh shares fell 1.4% to trade at $111.45 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Wells Fargo cut the price target for&nbsp;<b>Dow Inc.</b>&nbsp;from $75 to $67. Dow shares fell 0.8% to $54.49 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Barclays raised&nbsp;<b>McKesson Corporation</b>&nbsp;price target from $270 to $290. McKesson shares rose 1.1% to $229.33 on Thursday.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>SVB Leerink上调目标价<b>爱德华兹生命科学公司</b>从130美元到135美元。Edwards Lifesciences股价周四上涨1%，至120.68美元。</li><li>Keybanc筹集<b>宣伟公司</b>目标价为350美元至384美元。宣伟股价周四上涨1%，至345.68美元。</li><li>Piper Sandler切割<b>乌德米公司。</b>目标价为37美元至34美元。Udemy股价周四下跌2%，至20.65美元。</li><li>Needham将目标价下调至<b>Esperion治疗公司。</b>从20美元到12美元。Esperion Therapeutics股价周四下跌9%，至5.34美元。</li><li>摩根大通解除<b>菲利普斯66</b>目标价从83美元到93美元。Phillips 66股价周四上涨0.7%，至72.36美元。</li><li>加拿大皇家银行资本下调目标价<b>辛辛那提金融公司</b>从135美元到130美元。辛辛那提金融股价周四下跌1.7%，至115.23美元。</li><li>Chardan筹集的资金<b>迪塞纳制药公司。</b>目标价为28美元至38.25美元。Dicerna Pharmaceuticals股价周四上涨0.1%，至38.03美元。</li><li>摩根士丹利上调目标价<b>奥什科什公司</b>从134美元到144美元。周四，奥什科什股价下跌1.4%，至111.45美元。</li><li>富国银行下调目标价<b>陶氏公司。</b>从75美元到67美元。道指股价周四下跌0.8%，至54.49美元。</li><li>巴克莱筹集<b>麦克森公司</b>目标价为270美元至290美元。McKesson股价周四上涨1.1%，至229.33美元。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-09 23:43</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul>  <li>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on&nbsp;<b>Edwards Lifesciences Corporation</b>&nbsp;from $130 to $135. Edwards Lifesciences shares rose 1% to trade at $120.68 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Keybanc raised&nbsp;<b>The Sherwin-Williams Company</b>&nbsp;price target from $350 to $384. Sherwin-Williams shares rose 1% to $345.68 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Piper Sandler cut&nbsp;<b>Udemy, Inc.</b>&nbsp;price target from $37 to $34. Udemy shares fell 2% to trade at $20.65 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Needham lowered the price target on&nbsp;<b>Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.</b>&nbsp;from $20 to $12. Esperion Therapeutics shares dropped 9% to $5.34 on Thursday.</li>  <li>JP Morgan lifted&nbsp;<b>Phillips 66</b>&nbsp;price target from $83 to $93. Phillips 66 shares rose 0.7% to $72.36 on Thursday.</li>  <li>RBC Capital cut the price target for&nbsp;<b>Cincinnati Financial Corporation</b>&nbsp;from $135 to $130. Cincinnati Financial shares fell 1.7% to $115.23 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Chardan Capital raised&nbsp;<b>Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</b>&nbsp;price target from $28 to $38.25. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals shares rose 0.1% to $38.03 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Morgan Stanley boosted the price target on&nbsp;<b>Oshkosh Corporation</b>&nbsp;from $134 to $144. Oshkosh shares fell 1.4% to trade at $111.45 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Wells Fargo cut the price target for&nbsp;<b>Dow Inc.</b>&nbsp;from $75 to $67. Dow shares fell 0.8% to $54.49 on Thursday.</li>  <li>Barclays raised&nbsp;<b>McKesson Corporation</b>&nbsp;price target from $270 to $290. McKesson shares rose 1.1% to $229.33 on Thursday.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>SVB Leerink上调目标价<b>爱德华兹生命科学公司</b>从130美元到135美元。Edwards Lifesciences股价周四上涨1%，至120.68美元。</li><li>Keybanc筹集<b>宣伟公司</b>目标价为350美元至384美元。宣伟股价周四上涨1%，至345.68美元。</li><li>Piper Sandler切割<b>乌德米公司。</b>目标价为37美元至34美元。Udemy股价周四下跌2%，至20.65美元。</li><li>Needham将目标价下调至<b>Esperion治疗公司。</b>从20美元到12美元。Esperion Therapeutics股价周四下跌9%，至5.34美元。</li><li>摩根大通解除<b>菲利普斯66</b>目标价从83美元到93美元。Phillips 66股价周四上涨0.7%，至72.36美元。</li><li>加拿大皇家银行资本下调目标价<b>辛辛那提金融公司</b>从135美元到130美元。辛辛那提金融股价周四下跌1.7%，至115.23美元。</li><li>Chardan筹集的资金<b>迪塞纳制药公司。</b>目标价为28美元至38.25美元。Dicerna Pharmaceuticals股价周四上涨0.1%，至38.03美元。</li><li>摩根士丹利上调目标价<b>奥什科什公司</b>从134美元到144美元。周四，奥什科什股价下跌1.4%，至111.45美元。</li><li>富国银行下调目标价<b>陶氏公司。</b>从75美元到67美元。道指股价周四下跌0.8%，至54.49美元。</li><li>巴克莱筹集<b>麦克森公司</b>目标价为270美元至290美元。McKesson股价周四上涨1.1%，至229.33美元。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DOW":"陶氏化学","DRNA":"Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","MCK":"麦克森药物批发","EW":"爱德华兹","CINF":"辛辛那提金融","PSX":"Phillips 66","OSK":"Oshkosh","ESPR":"Esperion Therapeutics Inc.","SHW":"宣伟公司","UDMY":"Udemy, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134628800","content_text":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Edwards Lifesciences Corporation from $130 to $135. Edwards Lifesciences shares rose 1% to trade at $120.68 on Thursday.\nKeybanc raised The Sherwin-Williams Company price target from $350 to $384. Sherwin-Williams shares rose 1% to $345.68 on Thursday.\nPiper Sandler cut Udemy, Inc. price target from $37 to $34. Udemy shares fell 2% to trade at $20.65 on Thursday.\nNeedham lowered the price target on Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. from $20 to $12. Esperion Therapeutics shares dropped 9% to $5.34 on Thursday.\nJP Morgan lifted Phillips 66 price target from $83 to $93. Phillips 66 shares rose 0.7% to $72.36 on Thursday.\nRBC Capital cut the price target for Cincinnati Financial Corporation from $135 to $130. Cincinnati Financial shares fell 1.7% to $115.23 on Thursday.\nChardan Capital raised Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. price target from $28 to $38.25. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals shares rose 0.1% to $38.03 on Thursday.\nMorgan Stanley boosted the price target on Oshkosh Corporation from $134 to $144. Oshkosh shares fell 1.4% to trade at $111.45 on Thursday.\nWells Fargo cut the price target for Dow Inc. from $75 to $67. Dow shares fell 0.8% to $54.49 on Thursday.\nBarclays raised McKesson Corporation price target from $270 to $290. McKesson shares rose 1.1% to $229.33 on Thursday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DOW":0.9,"PSX":0.9,"DRNA":0.9,"UDMY":0.9,"EW":0.9,"SHW":0.9,"MCK":0.9,"CINF":0.9,"OSK":0.9,"ESPR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":804,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":602168881,"gmtCreate":1638984712123,"gmtModify":1638984712282,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602168881","repostId":"1161444269","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161444269","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1638977215,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161444269?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-08 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple shares rose nearly 2% to a new high<blockquote>苹果股价上涨近2%，创新高</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161444269","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Apple shares rose nearly 2% to a new high in morning trading.","content":"<p>Apple shares rose nearly 2% to a new high&nbsp;in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在早盘交易中上涨近2%，创下新高。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a9f5fdc1cb0a898675c515a39de7611\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple shares rose nearly 2% to a new high<blockquote>苹果股价上涨近2%，创新高</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple shares rose nearly 2% to a new high<blockquote>苹果股价上涨近2%，创新高</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-08 23:26</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple shares rose nearly 2% to a new high&nbsp;in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在早盘交易中上涨近2%，创下新高。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a9f5fdc1cb0a898675c515a39de7611\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161444269","content_text":"Apple shares rose nearly 2% to a new high in morning trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":745,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606665809,"gmtCreate":1638873208527,"gmtModify":1638873208692,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606665809","repostId":"1149974752","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149974752","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638873109,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1149974752?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-07 18:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"60 Biggest Movers From Yesterday<blockquote>昨天以来60个最大的推动者</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149974752","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Gainers\n\nInsignia Systems, Inc. shares jumped 200.4% to close at $15.05 on Monday after the company ","content":"<p><div> Gainers  Insignia Systems, Inc. shares jumped 200.4% to close at $15.05 on Monday after the company announced the commencement of a formal process to explore strategic options to maximize shareholder ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Insignia Systems，Inc.的股价周一上涨200.4%，收于15.05美元，此前该公司宣布开始正式程序，探索最大化股东利益的战略选择...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24474142/60-biggest-movers-from-yesterday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24474142/60-biggest-movers-from-yesterday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>60 Biggest Movers From Yesterday<blockquote>昨天以来60个最大的推动者</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n60 Biggest Movers From Yesterday<blockquote>昨天以来60个最大的推动者</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-07 18:31</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Gainers  Insignia Systems, Inc. shares jumped 200.4% to close at $15.05 on Monday after the company announced the commencement of a formal process to explore strategic options to maximize shareholder ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Insignia Systems，Inc.的股价周一上涨200.4%，收于15.05美元，此前该公司宣布开始正式程序，探索最大化股东利益的战略选择...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24474142/60-biggest-movers-from-yesterday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24474142/60-biggest-movers-from-yesterday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24474142/60-biggest-movers-from-yesterday\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","BNTX":"BioNTech SE","BZFD":"Buzzfeed"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24474142/60-biggest-movers-from-yesterday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149974752","content_text":"Gainers\n\nInsignia Systems, Inc. shares jumped 200.4% to close at $15.05 on Monday after the company announced the commencement of a formal process to explore strategic options to maximize shareholder value, including potential merger or acquisition.\nDel Taco Restaurants, Inc. shares climbed 66.1% to close at $12.51 on Monday.\nJack In The Box Inc agreed to acquire Del Taco Restaurants for $12.51 per share in cash in a deal valued at about $575 million.\nCumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. rose 51.2% to settle at $6.94 on above-average volume.\nAdicet Bio, Inc. shares gained 38.5% to close at $13.57 after the company announced interim data from its dose escalation Phase 1 study evaluating the safety and tolerability of ADI-001.\nAdvanced Human Imaging Limited surged 30.9% to settle at $6.02.\neFFECTOR Therapeutics, Inc. gained 29.1% to close at $7.37.\nCloopen Group Holding Limited climbed 27% to settle at $3.43.\nEdgewise Therapeutics, Inc. gained 22.8% to close at $18.42.\nGH Research PLC gained 21.9% to close at $23.47 after the company reported better-than-expected Q3 EPS results.\nIN8bio, Inc. rose 21.4% to close at $6.80. IN8bio, last month, named Trishna Goswami, M.D. as Chief Medical Officer.\nLiberty TripAdvisor Holdings, Inc. gained 21.1% to close at $2.47.\nProgenity, Inc. rose 19.5% to close at $2.82.\nVasta Platform Limited gained 18.8% to settle at $2.91.\nXiaobai Maimai Inc. rose 18% to close at $2.69.\nAtreca, Inc. climbed 17.8% to settle at $3.38.\nPriority Technology Holdings, Inc. rose 17.3% to close at $7.13.\nGCP Applied Technologies Inc. gained 17.1% to close at $31.64. Saint-Gobain announced plans to buy GCP Applied Technologies in a deal valued at around $2.3 billion.\nFG Financial Group, Inc. jumped 16.6% to settle at $3.79 as the company said its SPAC Platform partner, Aldel Financial has completed their previously announced business combination with Hagerty.\nByrna Technologies Inc. gained 16% to close at $15.16 after the company issued Q4 sales guidance above estimates and announced a $30 million buyback.\nQuoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. rose 15.8% to close at $3.74.\nKubient, Inc. climbed 15.8% to close at $2.8250. Kubient, last month, posted a Q3 loss of $0.16 per share.\nKLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. gained 15.7% to settle at $3.57.\nNorth European Oil Royalty Trust rose 14.8% to close at $9.86.\nVicinity Motor Corp. climbed 14.8% to close at $3.96.\nOfferpad Solutions Inc. rose 14.8% to settle at $7.38.\nSonendo, Inc. gained 14.7% to close at $9.50.\nTwin Vee Powercats Co. rose 13.8% to settle at $3.30.\nRecruiter.com Group, Inc. rose 9.8% to close at $3.14.\nCF Acquisition Corp. VI rose 6.7% to close at $12.70 on continued strength following the SPACs announcement of a merger with Rumble.\n\nLosers\n\nBolt Biotherapeutics, Inc. shares fell 55.8% to settle at $4.64 on Monday. Bolt Biotherapeutics announced the presentation of interim clinical data from its Phase 1/2 study of BDC-1001.\nAlset EHome International Inc. shares dropped 41.7% to close at $0.6302 on Monday after the company priced its $30 million underwritten public offering.\nReata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. fell 37.8% to close at $48.92. Traders circulated the FDA briefing document saying 'FDA review team does not believe the submitted data demonstrate that bardoxolone is effective in slowing the loss of kidney function in patients with AS...'\nAeglea BioTherapeutics, Inc. declined 36.5% to close at $3.81 after the company announced data from the Phase 3 study of pegzilarginase in Arginase 1 Deficiency (ARG1-D) patients aged two years and older. ARG1-D is a rare disease characterized by high levels of the amino acid arginine. The disease manifestations include spasticity, developmental delay, intellectual disability, and seizures.\nMiNK Therapeutics, Inc. fell 34.6% to settle at $6.85.\nNam Tai Property Inc. fell 29.8% to close at $10.00. Nam Tai Property confirmed results of special meeting of shareholders.\nAdagio Therapeutics, Inc. dipped 29% to close at $32.53.\nFinch Therapeutics Group, Inc. fell 28.4% to close at $10.97.\nElevation Oncology, Inc. fell 28.3% to close at $4.35.\nArqit Quantum Inc. dipped 27.6% to settle at $27.07 amid a rotation out of the space as well as a rise in treasury yields, which has pressured growth names.\nCreative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. dropped 27.4% to close at $1.62.\nBeyond Air, Inc. fell 23.4% to close at $10.36.\nIsoPlexis Corporation fell 22.7% to settle at $8.02.\nPyxis Oncology, Inc. dipped 20.9% to close at $9.64.\nPOINT Biopharma Global Inc. fell 20.9% to settle at $6.22.\nImago BioSciences, Inc. fell 20.6% to close at $16.22. Imago BioSciences, last month, posted a Q3 loss of $0.44 per share.\nOceanPal Inc. fell 19.5% to settle at $3.30. OceanPal recently entered into a time charter trip contract for its Panamax dry bulk vessel, the m/v Calipso, a 73,691 dwt vessel built in 2005, at a gross charter rate of $18,750 per day, for about 15-20 days.\nBioNTech SE dropped 18.7% to close at $279.83 as vaccine names pulled back after gaining in late November amid omicron concerns.\nOnion Global Limited dipped 18% to settle at $3.18.\nuCloudlink Group Inc. fell 17.5% to close at $2.31.\nVaxxinity, Inc. fell 17% to close at $7.32. B of A Securities initiated coverage on Vaxxinity with a Buy rating and announced a price target of $21.\nEntrada Therapeutics, Inc. dropped 16.7% to settle at $22.26.\nEnjoy Technology, Inc. declined 16.2% to close at $4.51.\nBird Global, Inc. fell 13.7% to close at $6.87.\nModerna, Inc. dipped 13.5% to close at $265.33. Moderna President Stephen Hoge said there’s a “real risk” that existing COVID-19 vaccines will be less effective against omicron, reported Bloomberg. In contrast, U.S. medical adviser Anthony Fauci said the variant’s severity might be limited.\nKazia Therapeutics Limited fell 13.4% to clsoe at $7.92. Kazia Therapeutics, last week announced final data from a Phase2 study of paxalisib as first-line therapy in patients with glioblastoma.\nAEye, Inc. fell 12.7% to close at $4.60.\nZscaler, Inc. fell 12.4% to close at $274.36. Daiwa Capital downgraded Zscaler from Neutral to Underperform and announced a $286 price target.\nErasca, Inc. dropped 11.5% to close at $12.51. Erasca, last month, posted a Q3 loss of $0.46 per share.\nBuzzFeed fell 11% to close at $8.56. The company has called itself \"the first publicly traded purely digital media company.\" Buzzfeed started trading on the Nasdaq on Monday.\nAST SpaceMobile, Inc. shares fell 8.9% to close at $8.42. AST SpaceMobile, last month, posted Q3 EPS of $0.07 on sales of $2.45 million.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MRNA":0.9,"BZFD":0.9,"BNTX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":884,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606022888,"gmtCreate":1638802396586,"gmtModify":1638802396752,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606022888","repostId":"1105886793","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1105886793","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1638801508,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1105886793?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-06 22:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV stocks dropped in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105886793","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Rivian,Nio,Xpeng Motors,Li Auto,Lucid,Fisker,Arrival,Niko","content":"<p>EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Rivian,Nio,Xpeng Motors,Li Auto,Lucid,Fisker,Arrival,Nikola and Canoo fell between 2% and 17%.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车股早盘下跌。特斯拉、Rivian、蔚来、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、Lucid、Fisker、Arrival、Nikola和Canoo下跌2%至17%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9266efa50ea9f5df4fb003478522ba65\" tg-width=\"402\" tg-height=\"728\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV stocks dropped in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV stocks dropped in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-06 22:38</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Rivian,Nio,Xpeng Motors,Li Auto,Lucid,Fisker,Arrival,Nikola and Canoo fell between 2% and 17%.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车股早盘下跌。特斯拉、Rivian、蔚来、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、Lucid、Fisker、Arrival、Nikola和Canoo下跌2%至17%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9266efa50ea9f5df4fb003478522ba65\" tg-width=\"402\" tg-height=\"728\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","FSR":"菲斯克","LCID":"Lucid Group Inc","LI":"理想汽车","RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.","NIU":"小牛电动","NIO":"蔚来","SEV":"Aptera Motors"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105886793","content_text":"EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Rivian,Nio,Xpeng Motors,Li Auto,Lucid,Fisker,Arrival,Nikola and Canoo fell between 2% and 17%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SEV":0.9,"GOEV":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"NKLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"TSP":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"LI":0.9,"FSR":0.9,"RIVN":0.9,"NIU":0.9,"LCID":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":958,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":608681816,"gmtCreate":1638712252733,"gmtModify":1638712252811,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3558609398993628","idStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608681816","repostId":"2189576203","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":722,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":874876425,"gmtCreate":1637763539686,"gmtModify":1637763539756,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/874876425","repostId":"2185517963","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":984,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":150301105,"gmtCreate":1624885798307,"gmtModify":1633947531409,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/150301105","repostId":"1170953229","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170953229","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624885060,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1170953229?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-28 20:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cloudflare: High-Quality Business, But Not Cheap<blockquote>Cloudflare：高质量的业务，但不便宜</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170953229","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nCloudflare is a high-performance CDN. Its paying customers continue to rapidly increase and","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Cloudflare is a high-performance CDN. Its paying customers continue to rapidly increase and show no signs of slowing down.</li>  <li>Cloudflare's gross margins are very high, reaching the high 70s%.</li>  <li>Cloudflare is priced at 53x forward sales, making it one of the most expensive SaaS names.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7cd9332f245bbb2907015fd86c5ff20\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"864\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>imaginima/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Cloudflare是一款高性能CDN。其付费客户继续快速增长，并且没有放缓的迹象。</li><li>Cloudflare的毛利率非常高，高达70%。</li><li>Cloudflare的定价是远期销售额的53倍，使其成为SaaS最昂贵的品牌之一。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>imaginima/E+来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Investment Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare(NYSE:NET)is Content Delivery Network (''CDN''). As the world continues to rapidly digitize, the demand for high-quality and fast internet networks continues to increase. To this end, it's perhaps no surprise that investors have long ago understood these prospects and reflected this belief into Cloudflare's share price. In fact, Cloudflare is now priced at 53x forward sales making it one of the most expensive SaaS names.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare（纽约证券交易所代码：NET）是内容交付网络（“CDN”）。随着世界继续快速数字化，对高质量和快速互联网网络的需求不断增加。为此，投资者很久以前就了解这些前景并将这种信念反映到Cloudflare的股价中或许也就不足为奇了。事实上，Cloudflare现在的定价是远期销售额的53倍，使其成为SaaS最昂贵的品牌之一。</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, Cloudflare's growth rates continue to be persistently high and stable. Investors interested in Cloudflare will have to adopt a firm buy-and-hold strategy.</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，Cloudflare的增长率仍然居高不下且稳定。对Cloudflare感兴趣的投资者将不得不采取坚定的买入并持有策略。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Voting Machine vs Weighing Machine</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投票机vs称重机</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare is a Content Delivery Network (''CDN''). Its mission is to make the internet secure, faster, and more reliable.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare是一个内容交付网络（“CDN”）。它的使命是使互联网更安全、更快、更可靠。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c97ad60d00f39022413a4453bb38d2d\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> This time last year, investors were passionately clamoring for Fastly (FSLY). It was viewed by many as a company that could do no wrong. This year, it's a dramatically different setup as the graph above depicts. Fastly has fallen by the wayside, while Cloudflare is now the reigning champion.</p><p><blockquote>去年这个时候，投资者对Fastly(FSLY)充满热情。许多人认为它是一家不会犯错的公司。今年，情况截然不同，如上图所示。Fastly已经半途而废，而Cloudflare现在是卫冕冠军。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are voting with their feet to exit Fastly and they are now piling in around Cloudflare.</p><p><blockquote>投资者正在用脚投票决定快速退出，他们现在正在涌入Cloudflare。</blockquote></p><p> As a value investor, I would normally argue that this is likely to once again revert. Here is a quote from Horace that legendary investor Benjamin Graham's investment philosophy was based on:<i>many shall berestoredthat now are fallen and many shall fall that now are in honor.</i></p><p><blockquote>作为一名价值投资者，我通常认为这种情况可能会再次恢复。以下是传奇投资者本杰明·格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham)的投资理念所基于的贺拉斯(Horace)的一句话：<i>许多现在倒下的人将会复活，许多现在被荣耀的人将会倒下。</i></blockquote></p><p> Having said that, for every snapping one-liner an investor might put out, the real investor's prospects lie in doing the work and attempting to discern the underlying opportunity.</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，对于投资者可能发表的每一句俏皮话，真正的投资者的前景在于做工作并试图辨别潜在的机会。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Cloudflare is a High-Quality Business</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Cloudflare是一项优质业务</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare's non-GAAP gross margins are not only incredibly high, but they are highly stable too.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare的非GAAP毛利率不仅高得令人难以置信，而且非常稳定。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/161c2d74e08d4ccf531ab30182bd8a62\" tg-width=\"747\" tg-height=\"613\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As a reminder, this compares with Fastly's60.1%as of Q1 2021. On the surface, this is incredibly alluring and is a typical indicator of a high-quality business.</p><p><blockquote>提醒一下，相比之下，Fastly截至2021年第一季度的这一比例为60.1%。从表面上看，这非常诱人，是高质量业务的典型指标。</blockquote></p><p> On the other hand, as we look out to Cloudflare's full-year guidance, its non-GAAP operating margins are expected to come in at<i>a negative 4%</i>. Of course, this is a substantial improvement from the negative 8% from 2020 and puts Cloudflare very close to breakeven.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，当我们展望Cloudflare的全年指引时，其非GAAP营业利润率预计将达到<i>负4%</i>.当然，这比2020年的负8%有了实质性的改善，并使Cloudflare非常接近盈亏平衡。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8a369e8d30ed6115c1e05ca0b8310f0a\" tg-width=\"516\" tg-height=\"237\"><span>Source: Long-Term Model</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：长期模型</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Nevertheless, to go from<i>negative 4% to positive +20% in operating margins is a very steep climb</i>. So, investors should be cautious and take this guide with a pinch of salt.</p><p><blockquote>然而，从<i>营业利润率从负4%到正+20%是一个非常陡峭的攀升</i>因此，投资者应谨慎行事，对本指南持保留态度。</blockquote></p><p> Moving on, its latest sets of results put Cloudflare's dollar-based net retention at 123%. This is an important metric because it not only shows that the company's customer base is sticky but reminds us that Cloudflare is capable of upselling 23% more services to its customers y/y.</p><p><blockquote>展望未来，其最新业绩显示Cloudflare以美元计算的净保留率为123%。这是一个重要的指标，因为它不仅表明该公司的客户群具有粘性，而且提醒我们Cloudflare能够向其客户追加销售23%的服务。</blockquote></p><p> This insight, together with the fact that Cloudflare's paying customers continue to increase, should provide investors with confidence that Cloudflare's business is very healthy, as its revenues are increasing by a mixture of increasing customers and higher prices:</p><p><blockquote>这一见解，加上Cloudflare付费客户持续增加的事实，应该会让投资者相信Cloudflare的业务非常健康，因为其收入正在通过客户增加和价格上涨的混合而增加：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a4e8e1944ecc73a022a5710a3dc07ad\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"559\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Revenue Growth Rates: Strong and Stable</p><p><blockquote>收入增长率：强劲而稳定</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc3dff42f73ccfdfc3b2b4f9a0eb65a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"><span>Source: author's calculations; **company guidance</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：作者计算；**公司指引</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Next, we can see above that Cloudflare continues to guide investors for mid-40s% CAGR - at least in the near term.</p><p><blockquote>接下来，我们可以在上面看到，Cloudflare继续引导投资者实现40%左右的复合年增长率——至少在短期内是这样。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore, knowing how conservative this management is, I suspect that Cloudflare will easily beat these targets and will perhaps even raise its guidance over the coming year.</p><p><blockquote>此外，知道管理层有多保守，我怀疑Cloudflare将轻松击败这些目标，甚至可能在来年提高其指导。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Nonetheless, we have to keep in mind that we are still discussing a company that's likely to finish 2021 with close to $600 million in revenues. In other words, growing at mid 40s% while the company is at sub $1 billion in revenues, and continuing to grow at mid-40s% at higher than $1 billion in revenues, it's quite a different feat. At some point, size takes a toll.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，我们必须记住，我们仍在讨论一家可能在2021年底收入接近6亿美元的公司。换句话说，在公司收入低于10亿美元的情况下以40%左右的速度增长，并在收入高于10亿美元的情况下继续以40%左右的速度增长，这是一个完全不同的壮举。在某些时候，规模会产生影响。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation - Not Cheap</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值——不便宜</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare is priced at 53x forward sales. This implies that optimism towards Cloudflare is incredibly high. Even amongst SaaS names, I believe this is an outlier. I follow many companies in this space and I don't know of any that are priced as richly as this.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare的定价是远期销售额的53倍。这意味着人们对Cloudflare的乐观情绪非常高。即使在SaaS的名字中，我也相信这是一个异常值。我关注了这个领域的许多公司，但我不知道有哪家公司的定价如此之高。</blockquote></p><p> The obvious comparison here is Fastly which is priced at 18x forward sales. But even amongst the cybersecurity names, a sector that is wildly known for its exuberant valuations the likes of CrowdStrike (CRWD) is priced at 42x sales.</p><p><blockquote>这里明显的比较是Fastly，它的定价是远期销售额的18倍。但即使在网络安全公司中，像CrowdStrike(CRWD)这样以估值过高而闻名的行业的定价也是销售额的42倍。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Bottom Line</b></p><p><blockquote><b>底线</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare is remarkably stable and growing at a rapid rate. Its valuation is not cheap at 53x sales, but there again high-quality companies rarely are. Investors intent on taking a position here may consider buying in dips.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare非常稳定，并且正在快速增长。它的估值并不便宜，是销售额的53倍，但同样很少有优质公司。有意在此建仓的投资者可以考虑逢低买入。</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, I prefer to stick to companies with more hairs on them and more cheaply valued. Happy investing!</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，我更喜欢坚持那些头发更多、估值更便宜的公司。投资愉快！</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cloudflare: High-Quality Business, But Not Cheap<blockquote>Cloudflare：高质量的业务，但不便宜</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCloudflare: High-Quality Business, But Not Cheap<blockquote>Cloudflare：高质量的业务，但不便宜</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-28 20:57</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Cloudflare is a high-performance CDN. Its paying customers continue to rapidly increase and show no signs of slowing down.</li>  <li>Cloudflare's gross margins are very high, reaching the high 70s%.</li>  <li>Cloudflare is priced at 53x forward sales, making it one of the most expensive SaaS names.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7cd9332f245bbb2907015fd86c5ff20\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"864\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>imaginima/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Cloudflare是一款高性能CDN。其付费客户继续快速增长，并且没有放缓的迹象。</li><li>Cloudflare的毛利率非常高，高达70%。</li><li>Cloudflare的定价是远期销售额的53倍，使其成为SaaS最昂贵的品牌之一。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>imaginima/E+来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Investment Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare(NYSE:NET)is Content Delivery Network (''CDN''). As the world continues to rapidly digitize, the demand for high-quality and fast internet networks continues to increase. To this end, it's perhaps no surprise that investors have long ago understood these prospects and reflected this belief into Cloudflare's share price. In fact, Cloudflare is now priced at 53x forward sales making it one of the most expensive SaaS names.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare（纽约证券交易所代码：NET）是内容交付网络（“CDN”）。随着世界继续快速数字化，对高质量和快速互联网网络的需求不断增加。为此，投资者很久以前就了解这些前景并将这种信念反映到Cloudflare的股价中或许也就不足为奇了。事实上，Cloudflare现在的定价是远期销售额的53倍，使其成为SaaS最昂贵的品牌之一。</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, Cloudflare's growth rates continue to be persistently high and stable. Investors interested in Cloudflare will have to adopt a firm buy-and-hold strategy.</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，Cloudflare的增长率仍然居高不下且稳定。对Cloudflare感兴趣的投资者将不得不采取坚定的买入并持有策略。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Voting Machine vs Weighing Machine</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投票机vs称重机</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare is a Content Delivery Network (''CDN''). Its mission is to make the internet secure, faster, and more reliable.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare是一个内容交付网络（“CDN”）。它的使命是使互联网更安全、更快、更可靠。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c97ad60d00f39022413a4453bb38d2d\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> This time last year, investors were passionately clamoring for Fastly (FSLY). It was viewed by many as a company that could do no wrong. This year, it's a dramatically different setup as the graph above depicts. Fastly has fallen by the wayside, while Cloudflare is now the reigning champion.</p><p><blockquote>去年这个时候，投资者对Fastly(FSLY)充满热情。许多人认为它是一家不会犯错的公司。今年，情况截然不同，如上图所示。Fastly已经半途而废，而Cloudflare现在是卫冕冠军。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are voting with their feet to exit Fastly and they are now piling in around Cloudflare.</p><p><blockquote>投资者正在用脚投票决定快速退出，他们现在正在涌入Cloudflare。</blockquote></p><p> As a value investor, I would normally argue that this is likely to once again revert. Here is a quote from Horace that legendary investor Benjamin Graham's investment philosophy was based on:<i>many shall berestoredthat now are fallen and many shall fall that now are in honor.</i></p><p><blockquote>作为一名价值投资者，我通常认为这种情况可能会再次恢复。以下是传奇投资者本杰明·格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham)的投资理念所基于的贺拉斯(Horace)的一句话：<i>许多现在倒下的人将会复活，许多现在被荣耀的人将会倒下。</i></blockquote></p><p> Having said that, for every snapping one-liner an investor might put out, the real investor's prospects lie in doing the work and attempting to discern the underlying opportunity.</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，对于投资者可能发表的每一句俏皮话，真正的投资者的前景在于做工作并试图辨别潜在的机会。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Cloudflare is a High-Quality Business</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Cloudflare是一项优质业务</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare's non-GAAP gross margins are not only incredibly high, but they are highly stable too.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare的非GAAP毛利率不仅高得令人难以置信，而且非常稳定。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/161c2d74e08d4ccf531ab30182bd8a62\" tg-width=\"747\" tg-height=\"613\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As a reminder, this compares with Fastly's60.1%as of Q1 2021. On the surface, this is incredibly alluring and is a typical indicator of a high-quality business.</p><p><blockquote>提醒一下，相比之下，Fastly截至2021年第一季度的这一比例为60.1%。从表面上看，这非常诱人，是高质量业务的典型指标。</blockquote></p><p> On the other hand, as we look out to Cloudflare's full-year guidance, its non-GAAP operating margins are expected to come in at<i>a negative 4%</i>. Of course, this is a substantial improvement from the negative 8% from 2020 and puts Cloudflare very close to breakeven.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，当我们展望Cloudflare的全年指引时，其非GAAP营业利润率预计将达到<i>负4%</i>.当然，这比2020年的负8%有了实质性的改善，并使Cloudflare非常接近盈亏平衡。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8a369e8d30ed6115c1e05ca0b8310f0a\" tg-width=\"516\" tg-height=\"237\"><span>Source: Long-Term Model</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：长期模型</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Nevertheless, to go from<i>negative 4% to positive +20% in operating margins is a very steep climb</i>. So, investors should be cautious and take this guide with a pinch of salt.</p><p><blockquote>然而，从<i>营业利润率从负4%到正+20%是一个非常陡峭的攀升</i>因此，投资者应谨慎行事，对本指南持保留态度。</blockquote></p><p> Moving on, its latest sets of results put Cloudflare's dollar-based net retention at 123%. This is an important metric because it not only shows that the company's customer base is sticky but reminds us that Cloudflare is capable of upselling 23% more services to its customers y/y.</p><p><blockquote>展望未来，其最新业绩显示Cloudflare以美元计算的净保留率为123%。这是一个重要的指标，因为它不仅表明该公司的客户群具有粘性，而且提醒我们Cloudflare能够向其客户追加销售23%的服务。</blockquote></p><p> This insight, together with the fact that Cloudflare's paying customers continue to increase, should provide investors with confidence that Cloudflare's business is very healthy, as its revenues are increasing by a mixture of increasing customers and higher prices:</p><p><blockquote>这一见解，加上Cloudflare付费客户持续增加的事实，应该会让投资者相信Cloudflare的业务非常健康，因为其收入正在通过客户增加和价格上涨的混合而增加：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a4e8e1944ecc73a022a5710a3dc07ad\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"559\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Revenue Growth Rates: Strong and Stable</p><p><blockquote>收入增长率：强劲而稳定</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc3dff42f73ccfdfc3b2b4f9a0eb65a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"><span>Source: author's calculations; **company guidance</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：作者计算；**公司指引</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Next, we can see above that Cloudflare continues to guide investors for mid-40s% CAGR - at least in the near term.</p><p><blockquote>接下来，我们可以在上面看到，Cloudflare继续引导投资者实现40%左右的复合年增长率——至少在短期内是这样。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore, knowing how conservative this management is, I suspect that Cloudflare will easily beat these targets and will perhaps even raise its guidance over the coming year.</p><p><blockquote>此外，知道管理层有多保守，我怀疑Cloudflare将轻松击败这些目标，甚至可能在来年提高其指导。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Nonetheless, we have to keep in mind that we are still discussing a company that's likely to finish 2021 with close to $600 million in revenues. In other words, growing at mid 40s% while the company is at sub $1 billion in revenues, and continuing to grow at mid-40s% at higher than $1 billion in revenues, it's quite a different feat. At some point, size takes a toll.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，我们必须记住，我们仍在讨论一家可能在2021年底收入接近6亿美元的公司。换句话说，在公司收入低于10亿美元的情况下以40%左右的速度增长，并在收入高于10亿美元的情况下继续以40%左右的速度增长，这是一个完全不同的壮举。在某些时候，规模会产生影响。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation - Not Cheap</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值——不便宜</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare is priced at 53x forward sales. This implies that optimism towards Cloudflare is incredibly high. Even amongst SaaS names, I believe this is an outlier. I follow many companies in this space and I don't know of any that are priced as richly as this.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare的定价是远期销售额的53倍。这意味着人们对Cloudflare的乐观情绪非常高。即使在SaaS的名字中，我也相信这是一个异常值。我关注了这个领域的许多公司，但我不知道有哪家公司的定价如此之高。</blockquote></p><p> The obvious comparison here is Fastly which is priced at 18x forward sales. But even amongst the cybersecurity names, a sector that is wildly known for its exuberant valuations the likes of CrowdStrike (CRWD) is priced at 42x sales.</p><p><blockquote>这里明显的比较是Fastly，它的定价是远期销售额的18倍。但即使在网络安全公司中，像CrowdStrike(CRWD)这样以估值过高而闻名的行业的定价也是销售额的42倍。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Bottom Line</b></p><p><blockquote><b>底线</b></blockquote></p><p> Cloudflare is remarkably stable and growing at a rapid rate. Its valuation is not cheap at 53x sales, but there again high-quality companies rarely are. Investors intent on taking a position here may consider buying in dips.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudflare非常稳定，并且正在快速增长。它的估值并不便宜，是销售额的53倍，但同样很少有优质公司。有意在此建仓的投资者可以考虑逢低买入。</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, I prefer to stick to companies with more hairs on them and more cheaply valued. Happy investing!</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，我更喜欢坚持那些头发更多、估值更便宜的公司。投资愉快！</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4436906-cloudflare-high-quality-business-but-not-cheap\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NET":"Cloudflare, Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4436906-cloudflare-high-quality-business-but-not-cheap","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170953229","content_text":"Summary\n\nCloudflare is a high-performance CDN. Its paying customers continue to rapidly increase and show no signs of slowing down.\nCloudflare's gross margins are very high, reaching the high 70s%.\nCloudflare is priced at 53x forward sales, making it one of the most expensive SaaS names.\n\nimaginima/E+ via Getty Images\nInvestment Thesis\nCloudflare(NYSE:NET)is Content Delivery Network (''CDN''). As the world continues to rapidly digitize, the demand for high-quality and fast internet networks continues to increase. To this end, it's perhaps no surprise that investors have long ago understood these prospects and reflected this belief into Cloudflare's share price. In fact, Cloudflare is now priced at 53x forward sales making it one of the most expensive SaaS names.\nHaving said that, Cloudflare's growth rates continue to be persistently high and stable. Investors interested in Cloudflare will have to adopt a firm buy-and-hold strategy.\nVoting Machine vs Weighing Machine\nCloudflare is a Content Delivery Network (''CDN''). Its mission is to make the internet secure, faster, and more reliable.\nData by YCharts\nThis time last year, investors were passionately clamoring for Fastly (FSLY). It was viewed by many as a company that could do no wrong. This year, it's a dramatically different setup as the graph above depicts. Fastly has fallen by the wayside, while Cloudflare is now the reigning champion.\nInvestors are voting with their feet to exit Fastly and they are now piling in around Cloudflare.\nAs a value investor, I would normally argue that this is likely to once again revert. Here is a quote from Horace that legendary investor Benjamin Graham's investment philosophy was based on:many shall berestoredthat now are fallen and many shall fall that now are in honor.\nHaving said that, for every snapping one-liner an investor might put out, the real investor's prospects lie in doing the work and attempting to discern the underlying opportunity.\nCloudflare is a High-Quality Business\nCloudflare's non-GAAP gross margins are not only incredibly high, but they are highly stable too.\n\nAs a reminder, this compares with Fastly's60.1%as of Q1 2021. On the surface, this is incredibly alluring and is a typical indicator of a high-quality business.\nOn the other hand, as we look out to Cloudflare's full-year guidance, its non-GAAP operating margins are expected to come in ata negative 4%. Of course, this is a substantial improvement from the negative 8% from 2020 and puts Cloudflare very close to breakeven.\nSource: Long-Term Model\nNevertheless, to go fromnegative 4% to positive +20% in operating margins is a very steep climb. So, investors should be cautious and take this guide with a pinch of salt.\nMoving on, its latest sets of results put Cloudflare's dollar-based net retention at 123%. This is an important metric because it not only shows that the company's customer base is sticky but reminds us that Cloudflare is capable of upselling 23% more services to its customers y/y.\nThis insight, together with the fact that Cloudflare's paying customers continue to increase, should provide investors with confidence that Cloudflare's business is very healthy, as its revenues are increasing by a mixture of increasing customers and higher prices:\n\nRevenue Growth Rates: Strong and Stable\nSource: author's calculations; **company guidance\nNext, we can see above that Cloudflare continues to guide investors for mid-40s% CAGR - at least in the near term.\nFurthermore, knowing how conservative this management is, I suspect that Cloudflare will easily beat these targets and will perhaps even raise its guidance over the coming year.\nNonetheless, we have to keep in mind that we are still discussing a company that's likely to finish 2021 with close to $600 million in revenues. In other words, growing at mid 40s% while the company is at sub $1 billion in revenues, and continuing to grow at mid-40s% at higher than $1 billion in revenues, it's quite a different feat. At some point, size takes a toll.\nValuation - Not Cheap\nCloudflare is priced at 53x forward sales. This implies that optimism towards Cloudflare is incredibly high. Even amongst SaaS names, I believe this is an outlier. I follow many companies in this space and I don't know of any that are priced as richly as this.\nThe obvious comparison here is Fastly which is priced at 18x forward sales. But even amongst the cybersecurity names, a sector that is wildly known for its exuberant valuations the likes of CrowdStrike (CRWD) is priced at 42x sales.\nThe Bottom Line\nCloudflare is remarkably stable and growing at a rapid rate. Its valuation is not cheap at 53x sales, but there again high-quality companies rarely are. Investors intent on taking a position here may consider buying in dips.\nHaving said that, I prefer to stick to companies with more hairs on them and more cheaply valued. Happy investing!","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NET":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":476,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":690683296,"gmtCreate":1639663750287,"gmtModify":1639663750461,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690683296","repostId":"1142996286","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142996286","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639659703,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1142996286?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 21:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Thursday<blockquote>周四美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142996286","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after the market staged a U-turn the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.$Delta Air Lines$ – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-","content":"<p>U.S.&nbsp;stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after&nbsp;the market staged a U-turn&nbsp;the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周四上午上涨，此前市场在前一交易日出现180度大转弯，欢迎美联储决定加快缩减规模并暂时维持利率不变。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 204 points, or 0.57%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 31.25 points, or 0.66%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 115.25 points, or 0.71%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e8a71c62338c2a045263d40bb9c86e4\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"368\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">With the Fed giving markets a breather Wednesday, traders will turn their Thursday to&nbsp;fresh Labor Department data on initial weekly jobless claims. First-time unemployment filings are expected to reflect a slight increase after&nbsp;last’s 52-week low.</p><p><blockquote>截至美国东部时间上午8:00，道指e-mini上涨204点，涨幅0.57%，标普500 e-mini上涨31.25点，涨幅0.66%，纳斯达克100 e-mini上涨115.25点，涨幅0.71%。随着美联储周三给市场喘息的机会，交易员将在周四转向劳工部关于每周首次申请失业救济人数的最新数据。首次申请失业救济人数预计将在去年创下52周低点后小幅上升。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">Delta Air Lines</a></b> – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-pandemic profit levels.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">达美航空</a></b>-达美航空预计第四季度利润为2亿美元，盘前上涨2.3%。市场普遍预测达美航空将出现季度亏损，但该航空公司表示，假期需求强劲，利润有望超过大流行前的水平。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">Accenture PLC</a></b> – The consulting firm’s shares surged 6.7% in the premarket after it reported better-than-expected profit and revenue for its latest quarter, and raised its earnings guidance for fiscal 2022. Revenue rose by more than 20% across the four biggest industry groups in Accenture’s customer base.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">埃森哲公司</a></b>-该咨询公司公布最新季度利润和收入好于预期，并上调2022财年盈利指引后，其股价盘前飙升6.7%。埃森哲客户群中四个最大行业集团的收入增长了20%以上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – The drugmaker’s shares declined 1% in premarket trading after it said its antibody cocktail loses potency against the omicron Covid-19 variant. Regeneron did say that the cocktail is effective against the delta variant.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">再生元制药</a></b>-该制药商表示其抗体鸡尾酒对奥密克戎Covid-19变种失去效力后，其股价在盘前交易中下跌1%。再生元确实说过这种鸡尾酒对德尔塔变异毒株有效。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">Lennar</a></b> – Lennar reported quarterly earnings of $3.91 per share, below the $4.15 consensus estimate, and the homebuilder’s revenue also fell short of forecasts. Lennar was hurt by higher lumber costs as well as increased labor costs and shortages of raw materials, resulting in delayed home deliveries. Lennar tumbled 6.3% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">伦纳尔</a></b>-Lennar公布的季度收益为每股3.91美元，低于市场普遍预期的4.15美元，该住宅建筑商的收入也低于预期。Lennar受到木材成本上涨、劳动力成本增加和原材料短缺的影响，导致送货上门延迟。Lennar在盘前下跌6.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">Novartis AG</a></b> – Novartis launched a new share buyback program worth up to $15 billion, with the drug maker planning to complete those repurchases by the end of 2023. Shares jumped 4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">诺华公司</a></b>-诺华启动了一项价值高达150亿美元的新股票回购计划，该制药商计划在2023年底前完成这些回购。股价在盘前交易中上涨4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a>&nbsp;</b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> rose 1.1% in the premarket after announcing that it added $12 billion to its share buyback program, bringing the total amount of its repurchase authority to $13.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a> </b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a>盘前股价上涨1.1%，此前该公司宣布向其股票回购计划增加120亿美元，使其回购授权总额达到132亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker's</a> </b>– Smucker struck a deal to sell its natural beverage and grains businesses to private equity firm Nexus Capital Management for $110 million, with the food producer saying it wanted to focus more resources on its core brands.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker的</a></b>-Smucker达成协议，以1.1亿美元的价格将其天然饮料和谷物业务出售给私募股权公司Nexus Capital Management，这家食品生产商表示希望将更多资源集中在其核心品牌上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> was added to the “conviction buy” list at Goldman Sachs, which points to the company’s pending launch of a new surgical system. Shares added 1.2% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a></b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a>被添加到高盛的“坚定买入”名单中，这表明该公司即将推出一种新的手术系统。盘前股价上涨1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T Inc</a> </b>– Morgan Stanley upgraded AT&amp;T to “overweight” from “equal-weight,” saying a recent slide by the stock creates an attractive risk-reward profile. The firm said there are several other key factors driving the upgrade, including the pending completion of the WarnerMedia/Discoverymerger. AT&amp;T gained 1.5% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T公司</a></b>-摩根士丹利将AT&amp;T的评级从“同等权重”上调至“跑赢大盘”，称该股近期的下滑创造了有吸引力的风险回报状况。该公司表示，还有其他几个关键因素推动了此次升级，包括WarnerMedia/Discovery合并即将完成。AT&amp;T在盘前交易中上涨1.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.</a> </b>– The pet products seller’s stock added 1.9% in the premarket after Needham began coverage with a “buy” rating. The firm feels Petco should outperform competitors in the pet category, given its presence in multiple channels including veterinary hospitals.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco健康和保健公司。</a></b>-在Needham开始给予“买入”评级后，这家宠物产品销售商的股价在盘前上涨了1.9%。该公司认为，鉴于Petco在包括兽医医院在内的多个渠道中的存在，它应该会超越宠物类别的竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a> </b>– The e-commerce platform operator rallied 2.9% in premarket trading after Evercore upgraded it to “outperform” from “in line.” Evercore noted that the stock is about 20% below its year highs and that the company represents a high-quality asset in terms of growth opportunities.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a></b>–Evercore将其评级从“持平”上调至“跑赢大盘”后，该电子商务平台运营商在盘前交易中上涨2.9%。Evercore指出，该股比年度高点低约20%，就增长机会而言，该公司代表着优质资产。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Thursday<blockquote>周四美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Thursday<blockquote>周四美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-16 21:01</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S.&nbsp;stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after&nbsp;the market staged a U-turn&nbsp;the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周四上午上涨，此前市场在前一交易日出现180度大转弯，欢迎美联储决定加快缩减规模并暂时维持利率不变。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 204 points, or 0.57%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 31.25 points, or 0.66%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 115.25 points, or 0.71%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e8a71c62338c2a045263d40bb9c86e4\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"368\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">With the Fed giving markets a breather Wednesday, traders will turn their Thursday to&nbsp;fresh Labor Department data on initial weekly jobless claims. First-time unemployment filings are expected to reflect a slight increase after&nbsp;last’s 52-week low.</p><p><blockquote>截至美国东部时间上午8:00，道指e-mini上涨204点，涨幅0.57%，标普500 e-mini上涨31.25点，涨幅0.66%，纳斯达克100 e-mini上涨115.25点，涨幅0.71%。随着美联储周三给市场喘息的机会，交易员将在周四转向劳工部关于每周首次申请失业救济人数的最新数据。首次申请失业救济人数预计将在去年创下52周低点后小幅上升。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">Delta Air Lines</a></b> – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-pandemic profit levels.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">达美航空</a></b>-达美航空预计第四季度利润为2亿美元，盘前上涨2.3%。市场普遍预测达美航空将出现季度亏损，但该航空公司表示，假期需求强劲，利润有望超过大流行前的水平。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">Accenture PLC</a></b> – The consulting firm’s shares surged 6.7% in the premarket after it reported better-than-expected profit and revenue for its latest quarter, and raised its earnings guidance for fiscal 2022. Revenue rose by more than 20% across the four biggest industry groups in Accenture’s customer base.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">埃森哲公司</a></b>-该咨询公司公布最新季度利润和收入好于预期，并上调2022财年盈利指引后，其股价盘前飙升6.7%。埃森哲客户群中四个最大行业集团的收入增长了20%以上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – The drugmaker’s shares declined 1% in premarket trading after it said its antibody cocktail loses potency against the omicron Covid-19 variant. Regeneron did say that the cocktail is effective against the delta variant.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">再生元制药</a></b>-该制药商表示其抗体鸡尾酒对奥密克戎Covid-19变种失去效力后，其股价在盘前交易中下跌1%。再生元确实说过这种鸡尾酒对德尔塔变异毒株有效。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">Lennar</a></b> – Lennar reported quarterly earnings of $3.91 per share, below the $4.15 consensus estimate, and the homebuilder’s revenue also fell short of forecasts. Lennar was hurt by higher lumber costs as well as increased labor costs and shortages of raw materials, resulting in delayed home deliveries. Lennar tumbled 6.3% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LEN\">伦纳尔</a></b>-Lennar公布的季度收益为每股3.91美元，低于市场普遍预期的4.15美元，该住宅建筑商的收入也低于预期。Lennar受到木材成本上涨、劳动力成本增加和原材料短缺的影响，导致送货上门延迟。Lennar在盘前下跌6.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">Novartis AG</a></b> – Novartis launched a new share buyback program worth up to $15 billion, with the drug maker planning to complete those repurchases by the end of 2023. Shares jumped 4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVS\">诺华公司</a></b>-诺华启动了一项价值高达150亿美元的新股票回购计划，该制药商计划在2023年底前完成这些回购。股价在盘前交易中上涨4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a>&nbsp;</b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> rose 1.1% in the premarket after announcing that it added $12 billion to its share buyback program, bringing the total amount of its repurchase authority to $13.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a> </b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">签证</a>盘前股价上涨1.1%，此前该公司宣布向其股票回购计划增加120亿美元，使其回购授权总额达到132亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker's</a> </b>– Smucker struck a deal to sell its natural beverage and grains businesses to private equity firm Nexus Capital Management for $110 million, with the food producer saying it wanted to focus more resources on its core brands.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SJM\">Smucker的</a></b>-Smucker达成协议，以1.1亿美元的价格将其天然饮料和谷物业务出售给私募股权公司Nexus Capital Management，这家食品生产商表示希望将更多资源集中在其核心品牌上。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">Intuitive Surgical</a> was added to the “conviction buy” list at Goldman Sachs, which points to the company’s pending launch of a new surgical system. Shares added 1.2% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a></b>–<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISRG\">直观手术</a>被添加到高盛的“坚定买入”名单中，这表明该公司即将推出一种新的手术系统。盘前股价上涨1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T Inc</a> </b>– Morgan Stanley upgraded AT&amp;T to “overweight” from “equal-weight,” saying a recent slide by the stock creates an attractive risk-reward profile. The firm said there are several other key factors driving the upgrade, including the pending completion of the WarnerMedia/Discoverymerger. AT&amp;T gained 1.5% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&amp;T公司</a></b>-摩根士丹利将AT&amp;T的评级从“同等权重”上调至“跑赢大盘”，称该股近期的下滑创造了有吸引力的风险回报状况。该公司表示，还有其他几个关键因素推动了此次升级，包括WarnerMedia/Discovery合并即将完成。AT&amp;T在盘前交易中上涨1.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.</a> </b>– The pet products seller’s stock added 1.9% in the premarket after Needham began coverage with a “buy” rating. The firm feels Petco should outperform competitors in the pet category, given its presence in multiple channels including veterinary hospitals.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WOOF\">Petco健康和保健公司。</a></b>-在Needham开始给予“买入”评级后，这家宠物产品销售商的股价在盘前上涨了1.9%。该公司认为，鉴于Petco在包括兽医医院在内的多个渠道中的存在，它应该会超越宠物类别的竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a> </b>– The e-commerce platform operator rallied 2.9% in premarket trading after Evercore upgraded it to “outperform” from “in line.” Evercore noted that the stock is about 20% below its year highs and that the company represents a high-quality asset in terms of growth opportunities.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a></b>–Evercore将其评级从“持平”上调至“跑赢大盘”后，该电子商务平台运营商在盘前交易中上涨2.9%。Evercore指出，该股比年度高点低约20%，就增长机会而言，该公司代表着优质资产。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142996286","content_text":"U.S. stock-index futures advanced Thursday morning after the market staged a U-turn the previous trading session, welcoming a Federal Reserve decision to ramp up the pace of its taper and leave interest rates unchanged — for now.\nAt 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 204 points, or 0.57%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 31.25 points, or 0.66%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 115.25 points, or 0.71%.With the Fed giving markets a breather Wednesday, traders will turn their Thursday to fresh Labor Department data on initial weekly jobless claims. First-time unemployment filings are expected to reflect a slight increase after last’s 52-week low.\nStocks making the biggest moves premarket: \nDelta Air Lines – Delta rose 2.3% in the premarket after projecting a $200 million fourth-quarter profit. Consensus forecasts were predicting a quarterly loss for Delta, but the carrier said it is seeing strong holiday demand and it is on the path toward exceeding pre-pandemic profit levels.\nAccenture PLC – The consulting firm’s shares surged 6.7% in the premarket after it reported better-than-expected profit and revenue for its latest quarter, and raised its earnings guidance for fiscal 2022. Revenue rose by more than 20% across the four biggest industry groups in Accenture’s customer base.\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals – The drugmaker’s shares declined 1% in premarket trading after it said its antibody cocktail loses potency against the omicron Covid-19 variant. Regeneron did say that the cocktail is effective against the delta variant.\nLennar – Lennar reported quarterly earnings of $3.91 per share, below the $4.15 consensus estimate, and the homebuilder’s revenue also fell short of forecasts. Lennar was hurt by higher lumber costs as well as increased labor costs and shortages of raw materials, resulting in delayed home deliveries. Lennar tumbled 6.3% in premarket action.\nNovartis AG – Novartis launched a new share buyback program worth up to $15 billion, with the drug maker planning to complete those repurchases by the end of 2023. Shares jumped 4% in premarket trading.\nVisa – Visa rose 1.1% in the premarket after announcing that it added $12 billion to its share buyback program, bringing the total amount of its repurchase authority to $13.2 billion.\nSmucker's – Smucker struck a deal to sell its natural beverage and grains businesses to private equity firm Nexus Capital Management for $110 million, with the food producer saying it wanted to focus more resources on its core brands.\nIntuitive Surgical – Intuitive Surgical was added to the “conviction buy” list at Goldman Sachs, which points to the company’s pending launch of a new surgical system. Shares added 1.2% in the premarket.\nAT&T Inc – Morgan Stanley upgraded AT&T to “overweight” from “equal-weight,” saying a recent slide by the stock creates an attractive risk-reward profile. The firm said there are several other key factors driving the upgrade, including the pending completion of the WarnerMedia/Discoverymerger. AT&T gained 1.5% in premarket trading.\nPetco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. – The pet products seller’s stock added 1.9% in the premarket after Needham began coverage with a “buy” rating. The firm feels Petco should outperform competitors in the pet category, given its presence in multiple channels including veterinary hospitals.\nShopify – The e-commerce platform operator rallied 2.9% in premarket trading after Evercore upgraded it to “outperform” from “in line.” Evercore noted that the stock is about 20% below its year highs and that the company represents a high-quality asset in terms of growth opportunities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699978086,"gmtCreate":1639744273350,"gmtModify":1639744273494,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699978086","repostId":"1168257220","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168257220","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639744121,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1168257220?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 20:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168257220","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropp","content":"<p><div> Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropped 0.4% to $399.00 in pre-market trading. JP Morgan cut the price target on Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Piper Sandler将埃森哲公司(NYSE：ACN)的目标价从354美元上调至433美元。埃森哲股价在盘前交易中下跌0.4%，至399.00美元。摩根大通下调美敦力公司（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MDT）的目标价...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-17 20:28</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropped 0.4% to $399.00 in pre-market trading. JP Morgan cut the price target on Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Piper Sandler将埃森哲公司(NYSE：ACN)的目标价从354美元上调至433美元。埃森哲股价在盘前交易中下跌0.4%，至399.00美元。摩根大通下调美敦力公司（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MDT）的目标价...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ADBE":"Adobe","ACN":"埃森哲","SBUX":"星巴克"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24666359/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-friday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168257220","content_text":"Piper Sandler boosted Accenture plc(NYSE:ACN) price target from $354 to $433. Accenture shares dropped 0.4% to $399.00 in pre-market trading.\nJP Morgan cut the price target on Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) from $130 to $105. Medtronic shares fell 0.9% to $101.26 in pre-market trading.\nRaymond James lifted the price target on Jabil Inc.(NYSE:JBL) from $70 to $80. Jabil shares fell 0.4% to $64.20 in pre-market trading.\nBMO Capital lowered the price target on T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.(NASDAQ:TROW) from $253 to $246. T. Rowe Price shares rose 1.2% to $192.99 in pre-market trading.\nBaird reduced the price target for Starbucks Corporation(NASDAQ:SBUX) from $126 to $116. Starbucks shares dropped 1.7% to $111.71 in pre-market trading.\nSVB Leerink raised Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(NASDAQ:ZNTL) price target from $89 to $97. Zentalis Pharmaceuticals shares fell 3.4% to $76.57 in pre-market trading.\nPiper Sandler cut Adobe Inc.(NASDAQ:ADBE) price target from $670 to $630. Adobe shares fell 0.8% to $561.80 in pre-market trading.\nKeybanc reduced the price target for Generac Holdings Inc.(NYSE:GNRC) from $540 to $500. Generac Holdings shares rose 3% to $360.40 in pre-market trading.\nNeedham cut Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc(NASDAQ:JAZZ) price target from $220 to $215. Jazz Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.4% to $124.00 in pre-market trading.\nJP Morgan boosted Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(NYSE:CMG) price target from $1,710 to $1,750. Chipotle shares fell 1.3% to close at $1,678.97 on Thursday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ADBE":0.9,"SBUX":0.9,"ACN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690604037,"gmtCreate":1639660828443,"gmtModify":1639660852435,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690604037","repostId":"1191683541","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191683541","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639658241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1191683541?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 20:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191683541","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc.. from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading.RBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc. from $195 to $175. Airbnb shares rose 0.3% to $168.62 in pre-market trading.Morgan Stanley lowered DocuSign, Inc. price target from $350 to $165. DocuSign shares dropped 2.4% to $147.51 in pre-market trading.Barclays cut the price target on Aptiv PLC from $212 to $200. Aptiv shares rose 2.7% to $168.91 in pre-market","content":"<p><div> Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc..(NYSE:UAA) from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading. RBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc.(NASDAQ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Stifel将Under Armour，Inc.（纽约证券交易所代码：UAA）的目标价从30美元下调至24美元。Under Armour股价在盘前交易中下跌0.7%，至22.22美元。加拿大皇家银行资本下调了Airbnb，Inc.（纳斯达克...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Thursday<blockquote>周四10个最大价格目标变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-16 20:37</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc..(NYSE:UAA) from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading. RBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc.(NASDAQ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Stifel将Under Armour，Inc.（纽约证券交易所代码：UAA）的目标价从30美元下调至24美元。Under Armour股价在盘前交易中下跌0.7%，至22.22美元。加拿大皇家银行资本下调了Airbnb，Inc.（纳斯达克...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"T":"At&T","DOCU":"Docusign","ABNB":"爱彼迎"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/21/12/24641061/10-biggest-price-target-changes-for-thursday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191683541","content_text":"Stifel cut the price target on Under Armour, Inc..(NYSE:UAA) from $30 to $24. Under Armour shares fell 0.7% to $22.22 in pre-market trading.\nRBC Capital lowered the price target on Airbnb, Inc.(NASDAQ:ABNB) from $195 to $175. Airbnb shares rose 0.3% to $168.62 in pre-market trading.\nMorgan Stanley cut AT&T Inc.(NYSE:T) price target from $32 to $28. AT&T shares rose 1.7% to $22.55 in pre-market trading.\nMorgan Stanley lowered DocuSign, Inc.(NASDAQ:DOCU) price target from $350 to $165. DocuSign shares dropped 2.4% to $147.51 in pre-market trading.\nBarclays cut the price target on Aptiv PLC(NYSE:APTV) from $212 to $200. Aptiv shares rose 2.7% to $168.91 in pre-market trading.\nRaymond James raised The Progressive Corporation(NYSE:PGR) price target from $105 to $110. Progressive shares rose 4.8% to close at $101.81 on Wednesday.\nWells Fargo boosted the price target for Magna International Inc.(NYSE:MGA) from $84 to $93. Magna International shares rose 1.7% to $79.04 in pre-market trading.\nB of A Securities reduced the price target for Wayfair Inc.(NYSE:W) from $265 to $175. Wayfair shares dropped 2.4% to $202.28 in pre-market trading.\nHC Wainwright & Co. cut IGM Biosciences, Inc.(NASDAQ:IGMS) price target from $114 to $76. IGM Biosciences shares fell 0.1% to close at $28.35 on Wednesday.\nNeedham cut Medtronic plc(NYSE:MDT) price target from $145 to $131. Medtronic shares rose 0.1% to $105.01 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DOCU":0.9,"ABNB":0.9,"T":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":926,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":873830290,"gmtCreate":1636906301234,"gmtModify":1636906301394,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/873830290","repostId":"1159096163","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1159096163","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636851053,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1159096163?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-14 08:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Shoppers Are Heading to Malls Again. These Stocks Are Good Bets.<blockquote>购物者再次前往购物中心。这些股票是不错的选择。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1159096163","media":"Barrons","summary":"By the time the pandemic hit the U.S. economy, the outlook for Abercrombie & Fitch seemed dire.\nOnce","content":"<p>By the time the pandemic hit the U.S. economy, the outlook for&nbsp;Abercrombie &amp; Fitch&nbsp;seemed dire.</p><p><blockquote>当疫情袭击美国经济时，Abercrombie&amp;Fitch的前景似乎很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Once a mall staple that captured the hearts and wallets of teenagers with stark, sexy advertising and dark, perfume-drenched stores, Abercrombie’s (ticker: ANF) stock price hit fresh lows in 2017. Shoppers’ distaste for the brand and a steady decrease in mall traffic clouded its future. Then, in March of 2020, the coronavirus began closing malls and stores across the country.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie（股票代码：ANF）曾经是购物中心的主食，以鲜明、性感的广告和深色、香水味十足的商店俘获了青少年的心和钱包，但其股价在2017年创下新低。购物者对该品牌的厌恶和商场客流量的稳步下降给其未来蒙上了阴影。然后，在2020年3月，冠状病毒开始关闭全国各地的商场和商店。</blockquote></p><p> The retail apocalypse, it seemed, was about to claim another victim.</p><p><blockquote>零售业的末日似乎即将夺走另一个受害者。</blockquote></p><p> But something surprising happened on the way to the funeral: Abercrombie enjoyed one of its best years since its 2000s heyday. Under CEO Fran Horowitz, the company rebranded, putting out a more inclusive message and pivoting its focus toward young professionals while fine-tuning its Hollister brand for teenagers.</p><p><blockquote>但在去葬礼的路上发生了令人惊讶的事情：Abercrombie享受了自2000年代全盛时期以来最好的一年。在首席执行官弗兰·霍洛维茨(Fran Horowitz)的领导下，该公司进行了品牌重塑，发布了更具包容性的信息，并将重点转向年轻专业人士，同时针对青少年微调了霍利斯特品牌。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue increased 24% year over year in the company’s fiscal second quarter ended July 31, and 3% from prepandemic levels. Its stock is up 120% this year as shoppers flush with cash flock back to stores.</p><p><blockquote>截至7月31日，该公司第二财季收入同比增长24%，较大流行前水平增长3%。随着现金充裕的购物者涌向商店，其股价今年上涨了120%。</blockquote></p><p> “Perception of a brand is a hard thing to turn, and it takes time in order to build back trust with your consumer,” Horowitz says in an interview with <i>Barron’s</i>. “So, here we are happy to say in 2021 that we are seeing, obviously, the wonderful effects of all of that hard work.”</p><p><blockquote>霍洛维茨在接受采访时表示：“品牌认知度很难改变，需要时间才能与消费者重新建立信任。”<i>巴伦周刊</i>.“因此，我们很高兴地说，在2021年，我们显然看到了所有这些努力工作的美妙效果。”</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie isn’t the only retail brand that is coming into a new period of growth. Over the past year, many of America’s retailers have not only clawed their way out of the abyss, but have harnessed macroeconomic changes ushered in by the pandemic to propel themselves into an unexpected renaissance.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie并不是唯一一个进入新增长期的零售品牌。在过去的一年里，许多美国零售商不仅走出了深渊，还利用疫情带来的宏观经济变化，推动自己进入了意想不到的复兴。</blockquote></p><p> Brands that successfully merged their bricks-and-mortar operations with digital strategies are seeing sales soar and stock prices rise, lifted by a strong market and consumers champing at the bit to spend their pandemic savings. The stock prices of many major mall-based retailers have soared, including&nbsp;Macy’s&nbsp;(M),Nordstrom&nbsp;(JWN), Famous Footwear parent Caleres&nbsp;(CAL), and&nbsp;Signet Jewelers (SIG), which all gained at least 100% in the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>在强劲的市场和急于花掉疫情积蓄的消费者的推动下，成功将实体业务与数字战略相结合的品牌销售额飙升，股价上涨。许多大型购物中心零售商的股价飙升，包括梅西百货(M)、诺德斯特龙(JWN)、著名鞋类母公司Caleres(CAL)和Signet Jewelers(SIG)，这些公司在过去12个月中都上涨了至少100%。</blockquote></p><p> These companies are now poised to reap the benefits of a potentially record-setting holiday season. Consumers could spend $851 billion, a 9.5% increase from last year’s record $777 billion and more than twice the 4.4% average increase over the past five years, according to the National Retail Federation.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司现在准备从可能创纪录的假期中获益。根据全国零售联合会的数据，消费者可能会花费8510亿美元，比去年创纪录的7770亿美元增长9.5%，是过去五年4.4%平均增幅的两倍多。</blockquote></p><p> No one knows whether the party will last or whether these stores are simply capturing sales that would have happened in the future. Before retail sales normalize, companies need to navigate a host of supply-chain and inflationary pressures that could put a damper on holiday sales.</p><p><blockquote>没有人知道这场派对是否会持续下去，或者这些商店是否只是在捕捉未来可能发生的销售。在零售销售正常化之前，企业需要应对一系列供应链和通胀压力，这些压力可能会抑制假日销售。</blockquote></p><p> But the unexpected revival has reaffirmed the faith of many brands in the power of the physical stores. While still heavily investing in online operations, they are continuing to bet big on a bricks-and-mortar future. And as investments in physical stores continue, the demise of the bricks-and-mortar retailer that many once expected no longer seems so certain.</p><p><blockquote>但意外的复兴重申了许多品牌对实体店力量的信念。虽然他们仍在大力投资在线业务，但他们继续在实体未来上下大赌注。随着对实体店投资的继续，许多人曾经预期的实体零售商的消亡似乎不再那么确定。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57cd1db2ff23484eff85f5e6ad64d7c8\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Wealthy households plan to spend an average $2,624 this holiday season, 15% more than last year.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>富裕家庭计划在这个假期平均花费2624美元，比去年增加15%。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The pandemic wasn’t exactly ideal for retailers, but it offered some unique opportunities. The problems were obvious. People were afraid to shop in person. Shoppers—even baby boomers—flocked online in unexpected numbers. Retail behemoths such as&nbsp;Amazon.com&nbsp;(AMZN) and&nbsp;Walmart (WMT) saw their best year ever.</p><p><blockquote>疫情对零售商来说并不理想，但它提供了一些独特的机会。问题是显而易见的。人们害怕亲自购物。购物者——甚至是婴儿潮一代——以意想不到的数量涌向网上。亚马逊（AMZN）和沃尔玛（WMT）等零售巨头经历了有史以来最好的一年。</blockquote></p><p> “The investor sentiment—especially from short term, hedge fund type investors—had just turned very negative on the group,” Columbia Threadneedle Investments retail analyst Mari Shor says. “I just think that investors weren’t really giving the companies, or the consumers, the benefit of the doubt.”</p><p><blockquote>Columbia Threadneedle Investments零售分析师Mari Shor表示：“投资者情绪——尤其是短期对冲基金类型投资者——刚刚对该集团变得非常负面。”“我只是认为投资者并没有真正相信公司或消费者。”</blockquote></p><p> Shor says the doubt among investors was rooted in the notion that traditional retailers, both prepandemic and postpandemic, wouldn’t make it out alive.</p><p><blockquote>肖尔表示，投资者的怀疑根源于这样一种观念，即传统零售商，无论是大流行前还是大流行后，都无法生存。</blockquote></p><p> But the pandemic gave retailers the rare chance to close poorly performing locations and focus on great ones. Many retailers also focused on getting better online, and shifted their sales strategies to target consumers wherever and whenever they wanted to shop—whether online, mobile, or in-store.</p><p><blockquote>但疫情给了零售商一个难得的机会，让他们关闭表现不佳的门店，专注于优秀的门店。许多零售商还专注于在网上做得更好，并将销售策略转向消费者，无论他们何时何地想购物——无论是网上购物、移动购物还是店内购物。</blockquote></p><p> In one example of a company looking to fuel growth while connecting digital and in-store operations, the parent company of Saks Fifth Avenue spun out its e-commerce arm, which is now expected to go public with a target valuation of $6 billion.</p><p><blockquote>萨克斯第五大道精品百货店(Saks Fifth Avenue)的母公司剥离了其电子商务部门，该部门目前预计将上市，目标估值为60亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Such approaches proved critical. Online and other non-store sales are expected to increase between 11% and 15% this holiday season, potentially reaching a high of $226 billion, according to National Retail Federation estimates.</p><p><blockquote>事实证明，这种方法至关重要。据美国零售联合会估计，今年假期在线和其他非商店销售额预计将增长11%至15%，可能达到2260亿美元的高点。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “We’d like to think that the pandemic not only accelerated the adoption of e-commerce around the world but also expanded the market,” says Pedro Palandrani, a research analyst at Global X who covers e-commerce.</p><p><blockquote>Global X负责电子商务的研究分析师佩德罗·帕兰德拉尼(Pedro Palandrani)表示：“我们认为，这场大流行不仅加速了电子商务在全球的采用，还扩大了市场。”</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie invested hundreds of millions of dollars in its digital strategy, emphasizing smooth transitions from digital to in-store experiences with initiatives such as improving the company’s website and instituting in-store returns and pickups for online purchases. The arrival of the pandemic prompted Abercrombie to close 130 stores worldwide and 50% of the brand’s flagships, bringing total store closures in the past 10 years to about 500, while strategically opening a few key new stores, Horowitz says.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie在其数字战略上投资了数亿美元，强调通过改进公司网站以及为在线购买建立店内退货和提货等举措，从数字体验平稳过渡到店内体验。Horowitz表示，疫情的到来促使Abercrombie关闭了全球130家门店和该品牌50%的旗舰店，使过去10年关闭的门店总数达到约500家，同时战略性地开设了一些重要的新店。</blockquote></p><p> “Stores matter, but they have to be the right size, the right location, and the right economics,” she says. “You put that together with the digital and it equals magic.”</p><p><blockquote>“商店很重要，但它们必须是合适的规模、合适的位置和合适的经济效益，”她说。“你把它和数字结合在一起，它就等于魔法。”</blockquote></p><p> Not only are physical stores cost-effective ways to draw in-person shoppers, but they also can serve as crucial distribution centers for online pickups and returns, as well as local shipping, says B. Riley Securities analyst Susan Anderson. In recent years, even online retailers such as Warby Parker (WRBY) have expanded their physical presence to accommodate shopper preferences. “The consumer wants to shop when and where they want to,” Anderson says.</p><p><blockquote>B.Riley Securities分析师苏珊·安德森(Susan Anderson)表示，实体店不仅是吸引亲自购物者的经济高效的方式，而且还可以作为在线提货和退货以及本地运输的重要配送中心。近年来，即使是Warby Parker(WRBY)等在线零售商也扩大了实体业务，以适应购物者的偏好。“消费者希望随时随地购物，”安德森说。</blockquote></p><p> That behavior can evolve in unexpected ways. Malls and physical stores are growing in popularity among digitally savvy teenagers and young adults.</p><p><blockquote>这种行为会以意想不到的方式演变。商场和实体店在精通数字技术的青少年和年轻人中越来越受欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> According to a survey of 1,000 shoppers earlier this year commissioned by BHDP, a design firm that counts retail among its specialties, 55% of 14-to-17 year olds say they are now shopping at indoor malls, and 90% plan to head to a mall in the next year. The 18-to-24-year-old shoppers surveyed are also back at the mall, trying on products, using in-store promotions, and making returns. Such shifts have led retailers to ditch old views and assumptions about specific demographics, says Rod Sides, vice chairman of U.S. retail and distribution at Deloitte.</p><p><blockquote>今年早些时候，设计公司BHDP委托对1,000名购物者进行的一项调查显示，55%的14至17岁青少年表示他们现在在室内购物中心购物，90%的人计划明年去购物中心。接受调查的18至24岁购物者也回到商场，试穿产品，利用店内促销活动，并进行退货。德勤(Deloitte)美国零售和分销副主席罗德·赛德斯(Rod Sides)表示，这种转变导致零售商放弃了对特定人群的旧观点和假设。</blockquote></p><p> The shifts in strategy during the pandemic put many retailers in a better position for the reopening of malls and downtowns this year—and shoppers were eager to open their wallets.</p><p><blockquote>疫情期间的战略转变使许多零售商在今年购物中心和市中心的重新开放中处于更好的位置——购物者渴望打开钱包。</blockquote></p><p> During the pandemic, some consumers became unexpectedly flush. They got stimulus payments, saved up from a decline in travel expenses, and saw the markets soar. Today, consumer savings at all income levels are at or near a record. Wealthy households are planning to spend 15% more than last year this holiday season, averaging $2,624 per household and driving much of the season’s growth, an annual Deloitte study found.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，一些消费者变得出乎意料地富有。他们获得了刺激付款，从旅行费用下降中节省下来，并看到市场飙升。如今，所有收入水平的消费者储蓄都处于或接近创纪录水平。德勤(Deloitte)的一项年度研究发现，富裕家庭计划在这个假期的支出比去年增加15%，平均每户2,624美元，推动了假期的大部分增长。</blockquote></p><p> “You got a lot of cash and there’s a fair amount of pent-up demand,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.</p><p><blockquote>穆迪分析公司首席经济学家马克·赞迪表示：“你有大量现金，而且有相当多被压抑的需求。”</blockquote></p><p> Retail and food-services sales increased to an estimated $625 billion in September, up 0.7% from October and 13.9% year over year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Sales in retail alone rose 0.8% from August. “We were expecting that you’d see some pullback in September, and we didn’t,” says Citigroup economist Veronica Clark.</p><p><blockquote>根据美国人口普查局的数据，9月份零售和食品服务销售额估计增至6250亿美元，比10月份增长0.7%，同比增长13.9%。仅零售额就比8月份增长了0.8%。花旗集团经济学家维罗妮卡·克拉克(Veronica Clark)表示：“我们预计9月份会出现一些回调，但我们没有。”</blockquote></p><p> Retailers are much healthier than they were a decade ago heading into the holiday season, Matthew Shay, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation, said in a media briefing in October. A yearly&nbsp;Mastercard&nbsp;spending index forecasts U.S. retail sales to increase 7.4% this season, with significant gains in apparel, department stores, jewelry, and luxury items.</p><p><blockquote>全国零售联合会主席兼首席执行官马修·谢伊(Matthew Shay)在10月份的媒体吹风会上表示，进入假期，零售商比十年前健康得多。万事达卡年度支出指数预测，本季美国零售额将增长7.4%，其中服装、百货商店、珠宝和奢侈品将大幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> Luxury retailer&nbsp;Burberry Group&nbsp;(BRBY.UK), known for its tartan fabric and scarves, said this past week that comparable sales for its first half of fiscal 2022 rose 37%, and that full-price sales are growing at a double-digit rate. And&nbsp;Tapestry&nbsp;(TPR), the parent company of Coach, posted better-than-expected fiscal first-quarter earnings, raising its outlook for 2022 sales and profits.</p><p><blockquote>以格子呢面料和围巾闻名的奢侈品零售商博柏利集团(BRBY.UK)上周表示，2022财年上半年可比销售额增长37%，全价销售额正以两位数的速度增长。Coach母公司Tapestry(TPR)公布的第一财季财报好于预期，上调了2022年销售额和利润预期。</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts are bullish on the retail sector, with Cowen saying that “many of the luxury brands have successfully been able to take price increases and will likely benefit from the historically strong consumer balance sheets in the U.S. and internationally.” Wolfe Research favors Nordstrom and Tapestry, among others, with analysts writing in a note that “nearly all the major drivers of U.S. consumer spending favor the high end.”</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师看好零售业，考恩表示，“许多奢侈品牌已经成功地应对了价格上涨，并可能受益于美国和国际上历史上强劲的消费者资产负债表。”Wolfe Research青睐Nordstrom和Tapestry等公司，分析师在一份报告中写道，“美国消费者支出的几乎所有主要驱动因素都青睐高端产品。”</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, more Americans started coming out to the mall. Placer.ai mall-traffic statistics show that foot traffic for indoor malls was up 3% in October compared with 2019 levels, and traffic for outdoor malls was up 5%—one of the reasons mall stores are seeing their stocks soar. Simon Property Group (SPG), which owns the malls themselves, saw its stock gain about 90% in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，更多的美国人开始来到购物中心。Placer.ai购物中心——流量统计显示，与2019年相比，10月份室内购物中心的客流量增长了3%，室外购物中心的客流量增长了5%——这是购物中心商店库存飙升的原因之一。拥有这些购物中心的西蒙地产集团(SPG)的股价在2021年上涨了约90%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “With the combination of more individuals becoming fully vaccinated, paired with many shopping early for the coming holiday season due to supply-chain concerns, we have seen a steady rise in foot traffic since July,” says Lindsay Petak, senior marketing manager for Tysons Corner Center in the Washington region. The mall is owned by Macerich (MAC), which also has seen its share price nearly double this year.</p><p><blockquote>泰森斯高级营销经理林赛·佩塔克(Lindsay Petak)表示：“随着越来越多的人完全接种疫苗，再加上许多人出于供应链担忧为即将到来的假期提前购物，自7月份以来，我们看到客流量稳步上升。”华盛顿地区的角落中心。该购物中心归Macerich(MAC)所有，该公司的股价今年也几乎翻了一番。</blockquote></p><p> All of this added to a stock run-up for the ages for beaten-down retailers. Over the past year, the&nbsp;SPDR S&amp;P Retail&nbsp;exchanged-trade fund (XRT) was up 85%, while the S&amp;P 500 rose 33%. The&nbsp;Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary&nbsp;ETF (RCD) has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by five percentage points this year, a sign that investors remain bullish on retail sales.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都加剧了遭受重创的零售商多年来的股价上涨。过去一年，SPDR S&amp;P零售交易所交易基金(XRT)上涨了85%，而标普500则上涨了33%。景顺标普500等权重非必需消费品ETF（RCD）今年的表现优于标普500 5个百分点，这表明投资者仍然看好零售销售。</blockquote></p><p> “We’ve seen department stores and apparel and discretionary retailers really bounce back as soon as the economy reopened,” the NRF’s Shay says. “Department stores are always a popular destination for the holiday season, based on the consumer survey work we do....They continue to be at the top of the list of the places people shop this year.”</p><p><blockquote>NRF的谢伊说：“我们看到百货商店、服装和非必需消费品零售商在经济重新开放后就真正反弹了。”“根据我们所做的消费者调查工作，百货商店始终是节日期间的热门目的地……它们继续位居今年人们购物场所的榜首。”</blockquote></p><p> All that said, analysts and investors alike remain confident of the role physical stores play, which might look different from their online counterparts, but they’re here to stay.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，分析师和投资者仍然对实体店所扮演的角色充满信心，实体店可能看起来与在线商店不同，但它们将继续存在。</blockquote></p><p> The verdict on whether the retail renaissance is sustainable in the long term isn’t in yet. Retailers are operating in a macroeconomic environment far from the norm, making any guesses even more speculative.</p><p><blockquote>从长远来看，零售业复兴是否可持续还没有定论。零售商在远离正常的宏观经济环境中运营，这使得任何猜测都更具投机性。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think we have normal insight yet because there are just too many complexities throughout the business right now,” says Jefferies analyst Janine Stichter.</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)分析师珍妮·施蒂希特(Janine Stichter)表示：“我认为我们还没有正常的洞察力，因为目前整个业务存在太多复杂性。”</blockquote></p><p> Companies are struggling to manage ongoing supply-chain concerns, inflationary pressures, and a persistent labor shortage, which are likely to bite into earnings despite all signs pointing to a strong holiday quarter. “The supply-chain issues, they’re real,” Horowitz says.</p><p><blockquote>企业正在努力应对持续的供应链担忧、通胀压力和持续的劳动力短缺，尽管所有迹象都表明假日季度表现强劲，但这些问题可能会影响盈利。“供应链问题是真实存在的，”霍洛维茨说。</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie is assuming a modest impact on sales due to supply-chain constraints, with even bigger impacts coming from freight inflation, the company said in its second-quarter earnings call.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie在第二季度收益看涨期权中表示，由于供应链限制，该公司预计销售将受到适度影响，而更大的影响来自运费通胀。</blockquote></p><p> To ease supply-chain pressures, retailers are encouraging consumers to start their shopping early—a trend that could skew end-of-year sales data, Citigroup’s Clark says. If shoppers pull their gift-buying forward, there could be a decline in November and December compared with previous years. “It’s not necessarily that spending is much weaker; it’s just that the distribution over months is different,” she says.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团的克拉克表示，为了缓解供应链压力，零售商鼓励消费者尽早开始购物，这一趋势可能会扭曲年终销售数据。如果购物者提前购买礼物，与往年相比，11月和12月的礼物数量可能会有所下降。“这并不一定是支出疲软得多；只是几个月的分布不同，”她说。</blockquote></p><p> On the flip side, low inventories will give retailers higher pricing power that can help offset supply-chain disruptions, Stichter says. While beneficial to retailers, this could drive prices up even more, says Sasha Tomic, an economist at Boston College.</p><p><blockquote>Stichter表示，另一方面，低库存将为零售商提供更高的定价权，有助于抵消供应链中断。波士顿学院经济学家萨沙·托米奇表示，虽然这对零售商有利，但可能会进一步推高价格。</blockquote></p><p> Whatever the risks, strong performance won’t last forever, says Matthew Forester, chief investment officer at BNY Mellon’s Lockwood Advisors. “The U.S. economy, overall, is clearly slowing down,” he says. “And we’re going to slow down into the next year. Plus, as we get back to trend growth, that’s just what’s likely to happen.”</p><p><blockquote>纽约梅隆银行洛克伍德顾问公司首席投资官马修·福雷斯特表示，无论风险如何，强劲的业绩都不会永远持续下去。“总体而言，美国经济明显放缓，”他说。“明年我们将放缓。此外，随着我们恢复趋势增长，这正是可能发生的情况。”</blockquote></p><p> The economy will eventually exit its euphoria as stimulus continues to dwindle, he says. And while the comedown might not be “terrible,” he says, it will still be a decline from where consumer spending is now.</p><p><blockquote>他表示，随着刺激措施的继续减少，经济最终将退出兴奋状态。他表示，虽然下降可能并不“可怕”，但消费者支出仍将较目前有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie, though, is powering through the headwinds with the help of its bricks-and-mortar stores. The company is planning to position more inventory in stores, and is routing e-commerce orders to stores as well as partnering with Uber, Shipt, and Postmates to offer same-day delivery.</p><p><blockquote>不过，Abercrombie正在其实体店的帮助下克服逆风。该公司计划在商店放置更多库存，并将电子商务订单发送到商店，并与Uber、Shipt和Postmates合作提供当天送达服务。</blockquote></p><p> Other retailers have taken supply-chain solutions in their own hands. Specialty-apparel company American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) recently announced it was acquiring Quiet Logistics, an operator of automated distribution centers near city centers, just weeks after it bought AirTerra, which focuses on middle-mile logistics—the delivery of products from a warehouse to a retail store.</p><p><blockquote>其他零售商已经将供应链解决方案掌握在自己手中。特种服装公司American Eagle Outfitters(AEO)最近宣布将收购市中心附近自动化配送中心运营商Quiet Logistics，就在几周前，该公司收购了专注于中英里物流（将产品从仓库运送到零售店）的AirTerra。</blockquote></p><p> “We’re going to just continue at it,” Horowitz says.</p><p><blockquote>“我们将继续这样做，”霍洛维茨说。</blockquote></p><p> As retailers forge ahead, doomsayers might have to hold off on heralding a retail apocalypse. For now, the sentiment is clear: Consumers are rediscovering the joys of bricks-and-mortar shopping. The mall has become cool again.</p><p><blockquote>随着零售商的前进，末日预言家可能不得不推迟预示零售业的末日。目前，人们的情绪很明显：消费者正在重新发现实体购物的乐趣。商场又变得凉爽了。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Shoppers Are Heading to Malls Again. These Stocks Are Good Bets.<blockquote>购物者再次前往购物中心。这些股票是不错的选择。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShoppers Are Heading to Malls Again. These Stocks Are Good Bets.<blockquote>购物者再次前往购物中心。这些股票是不错的选择。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-14 08:50</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>By the time the pandemic hit the U.S. economy, the outlook for&nbsp;Abercrombie &amp; Fitch&nbsp;seemed dire.</p><p><blockquote>当疫情袭击美国经济时，Abercrombie&amp;Fitch的前景似乎很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Once a mall staple that captured the hearts and wallets of teenagers with stark, sexy advertising and dark, perfume-drenched stores, Abercrombie’s (ticker: ANF) stock price hit fresh lows in 2017. Shoppers’ distaste for the brand and a steady decrease in mall traffic clouded its future. Then, in March of 2020, the coronavirus began closing malls and stores across the country.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie（股票代码：ANF）曾经是购物中心的主食，以鲜明、性感的广告和深色、香水味十足的商店俘获了青少年的心和钱包，但其股价在2017年创下新低。购物者对该品牌的厌恶和商场客流量的稳步下降给其未来蒙上了阴影。然后，在2020年3月，冠状病毒开始关闭全国各地的商场和商店。</blockquote></p><p> The retail apocalypse, it seemed, was about to claim another victim.</p><p><blockquote>零售业的末日似乎即将夺走另一个受害者。</blockquote></p><p> But something surprising happened on the way to the funeral: Abercrombie enjoyed one of its best years since its 2000s heyday. Under CEO Fran Horowitz, the company rebranded, putting out a more inclusive message and pivoting its focus toward young professionals while fine-tuning its Hollister brand for teenagers.</p><p><blockquote>但在去葬礼的路上发生了令人惊讶的事情：Abercrombie享受了自2000年代全盛时期以来最好的一年。在首席执行官弗兰·霍洛维茨(Fran Horowitz)的领导下，该公司进行了品牌重塑，发布了更具包容性的信息，并将重点转向年轻专业人士，同时针对青少年微调了霍利斯特品牌。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue increased 24% year over year in the company’s fiscal second quarter ended July 31, and 3% from prepandemic levels. Its stock is up 120% this year as shoppers flush with cash flock back to stores.</p><p><blockquote>截至7月31日，该公司第二财季收入同比增长24%，较大流行前水平增长3%。随着现金充裕的购物者涌向商店，其股价今年上涨了120%。</blockquote></p><p> “Perception of a brand is a hard thing to turn, and it takes time in order to build back trust with your consumer,” Horowitz says in an interview with <i>Barron’s</i>. “So, here we are happy to say in 2021 that we are seeing, obviously, the wonderful effects of all of that hard work.”</p><p><blockquote>霍洛维茨在接受采访时表示：“品牌认知度很难改变，需要时间才能与消费者重新建立信任。”<i>巴伦周刊</i>.“因此，我们很高兴地说，在2021年，我们显然看到了所有这些努力工作的美妙效果。”</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie isn’t the only retail brand that is coming into a new period of growth. Over the past year, many of America’s retailers have not only clawed their way out of the abyss, but have harnessed macroeconomic changes ushered in by the pandemic to propel themselves into an unexpected renaissance.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie并不是唯一一个进入新增长期的零售品牌。在过去的一年里，许多美国零售商不仅走出了深渊，还利用疫情带来的宏观经济变化，推动自己进入了意想不到的复兴。</blockquote></p><p> Brands that successfully merged their bricks-and-mortar operations with digital strategies are seeing sales soar and stock prices rise, lifted by a strong market and consumers champing at the bit to spend their pandemic savings. The stock prices of many major mall-based retailers have soared, including&nbsp;Macy’s&nbsp;(M),Nordstrom&nbsp;(JWN), Famous Footwear parent Caleres&nbsp;(CAL), and&nbsp;Signet Jewelers (SIG), which all gained at least 100% in the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>在强劲的市场和急于花掉疫情积蓄的消费者的推动下，成功将实体业务与数字战略相结合的品牌销售额飙升，股价上涨。许多大型购物中心零售商的股价飙升，包括梅西百货(M)、诺德斯特龙(JWN)、著名鞋类母公司Caleres(CAL)和Signet Jewelers(SIG)，这些公司在过去12个月中都上涨了至少100%。</blockquote></p><p> These companies are now poised to reap the benefits of a potentially record-setting holiday season. Consumers could spend $851 billion, a 9.5% increase from last year’s record $777 billion and more than twice the 4.4% average increase over the past five years, according to the National Retail Federation.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司现在准备从可能创纪录的假期中获益。根据全国零售联合会的数据，消费者可能会花费8510亿美元，比去年创纪录的7770亿美元增长9.5%，是过去五年4.4%平均增幅的两倍多。</blockquote></p><p> No one knows whether the party will last or whether these stores are simply capturing sales that would have happened in the future. Before retail sales normalize, companies need to navigate a host of supply-chain and inflationary pressures that could put a damper on holiday sales.</p><p><blockquote>没有人知道这场派对是否会持续下去，或者这些商店是否只是在捕捉未来可能发生的销售。在零售销售正常化之前，企业需要应对一系列供应链和通胀压力，这些压力可能会抑制假日销售。</blockquote></p><p> But the unexpected revival has reaffirmed the faith of many brands in the power of the physical stores. While still heavily investing in online operations, they are continuing to bet big on a bricks-and-mortar future. And as investments in physical stores continue, the demise of the bricks-and-mortar retailer that many once expected no longer seems so certain.</p><p><blockquote>但意外的复兴重申了许多品牌对实体店力量的信念。虽然他们仍在大力投资在线业务，但他们继续在实体未来上下大赌注。随着对实体店投资的继续，许多人曾经预期的实体零售商的消亡似乎不再那么确定。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57cd1db2ff23484eff85f5e6ad64d7c8\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Wealthy households plan to spend an average $2,624 this holiday season, 15% more than last year.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>富裕家庭计划在这个假期平均花费2624美元，比去年增加15%。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The pandemic wasn’t exactly ideal for retailers, but it offered some unique opportunities. The problems were obvious. People were afraid to shop in person. Shoppers—even baby boomers—flocked online in unexpected numbers. Retail behemoths such as&nbsp;Amazon.com&nbsp;(AMZN) and&nbsp;Walmart (WMT) saw their best year ever.</p><p><blockquote>疫情对零售商来说并不理想，但它提供了一些独特的机会。问题是显而易见的。人们害怕亲自购物。购物者——甚至是婴儿潮一代——以意想不到的数量涌向网上。亚马逊（AMZN）和沃尔玛（WMT）等零售巨头经历了有史以来最好的一年。</blockquote></p><p> “The investor sentiment—especially from short term, hedge fund type investors—had just turned very negative on the group,” Columbia Threadneedle Investments retail analyst Mari Shor says. “I just think that investors weren’t really giving the companies, or the consumers, the benefit of the doubt.”</p><p><blockquote>Columbia Threadneedle Investments零售分析师Mari Shor表示：“投资者情绪——尤其是短期对冲基金类型投资者——刚刚对该集团变得非常负面。”“我只是认为投资者并没有真正相信公司或消费者。”</blockquote></p><p> Shor says the doubt among investors was rooted in the notion that traditional retailers, both prepandemic and postpandemic, wouldn’t make it out alive.</p><p><blockquote>肖尔表示，投资者的怀疑根源于这样一种观念，即传统零售商，无论是大流行前还是大流行后，都无法生存。</blockquote></p><p> But the pandemic gave retailers the rare chance to close poorly performing locations and focus on great ones. Many retailers also focused on getting better online, and shifted their sales strategies to target consumers wherever and whenever they wanted to shop—whether online, mobile, or in-store.</p><p><blockquote>但疫情给了零售商一个难得的机会，让他们关闭表现不佳的门店，专注于优秀的门店。许多零售商还专注于在网上做得更好，并将销售策略转向消费者，无论他们何时何地想购物——无论是网上购物、移动购物还是店内购物。</blockquote></p><p> In one example of a company looking to fuel growth while connecting digital and in-store operations, the parent company of Saks Fifth Avenue spun out its e-commerce arm, which is now expected to go public with a target valuation of $6 billion.</p><p><blockquote>萨克斯第五大道精品百货店(Saks Fifth Avenue)的母公司剥离了其电子商务部门，该部门目前预计将上市，目标估值为60亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Such approaches proved critical. Online and other non-store sales are expected to increase between 11% and 15% this holiday season, potentially reaching a high of $226 billion, according to National Retail Federation estimates.</p><p><blockquote>事实证明，这种方法至关重要。据美国零售联合会估计，今年假期在线和其他非商店销售额预计将增长11%至15%，可能达到2260亿美元的高点。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “We’d like to think that the pandemic not only accelerated the adoption of e-commerce around the world but also expanded the market,” says Pedro Palandrani, a research analyst at Global X who covers e-commerce.</p><p><blockquote>Global X负责电子商务的研究分析师佩德罗·帕兰德拉尼(Pedro Palandrani)表示：“我们认为，这场大流行不仅加速了电子商务在全球的采用，还扩大了市场。”</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie invested hundreds of millions of dollars in its digital strategy, emphasizing smooth transitions from digital to in-store experiences with initiatives such as improving the company’s website and instituting in-store returns and pickups for online purchases. The arrival of the pandemic prompted Abercrombie to close 130 stores worldwide and 50% of the brand’s flagships, bringing total store closures in the past 10 years to about 500, while strategically opening a few key new stores, Horowitz says.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie在其数字战略上投资了数亿美元，强调通过改进公司网站以及为在线购买建立店内退货和提货等举措，从数字体验平稳过渡到店内体验。Horowitz表示，疫情的到来促使Abercrombie关闭了全球130家门店和该品牌50%的旗舰店，使过去10年关闭的门店总数达到约500家，同时战略性地开设了一些重要的新店。</blockquote></p><p> “Stores matter, but they have to be the right size, the right location, and the right economics,” she says. “You put that together with the digital and it equals magic.”</p><p><blockquote>“商店很重要，但它们必须是合适的规模、合适的位置和合适的经济效益，”她说。“你把它和数字结合在一起，它就等于魔法。”</blockquote></p><p> Not only are physical stores cost-effective ways to draw in-person shoppers, but they also can serve as crucial distribution centers for online pickups and returns, as well as local shipping, says B. Riley Securities analyst Susan Anderson. In recent years, even online retailers such as Warby Parker (WRBY) have expanded their physical presence to accommodate shopper preferences. “The consumer wants to shop when and where they want to,” Anderson says.</p><p><blockquote>B.Riley Securities分析师苏珊·安德森(Susan Anderson)表示，实体店不仅是吸引亲自购物者的经济高效的方式，而且还可以作为在线提货和退货以及本地运输的重要配送中心。近年来，即使是Warby Parker(WRBY)等在线零售商也扩大了实体业务，以适应购物者的偏好。“消费者希望随时随地购物，”安德森说。</blockquote></p><p> That behavior can evolve in unexpected ways. Malls and physical stores are growing in popularity among digitally savvy teenagers and young adults.</p><p><blockquote>这种行为会以意想不到的方式演变。商场和实体店在精通数字技术的青少年和年轻人中越来越受欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> According to a survey of 1,000 shoppers earlier this year commissioned by BHDP, a design firm that counts retail among its specialties, 55% of 14-to-17 year olds say they are now shopping at indoor malls, and 90% plan to head to a mall in the next year. The 18-to-24-year-old shoppers surveyed are also back at the mall, trying on products, using in-store promotions, and making returns. Such shifts have led retailers to ditch old views and assumptions about specific demographics, says Rod Sides, vice chairman of U.S. retail and distribution at Deloitte.</p><p><blockquote>今年早些时候，设计公司BHDP委托对1,000名购物者进行的一项调查显示，55%的14至17岁青少年表示他们现在在室内购物中心购物，90%的人计划明年去购物中心。接受调查的18至24岁购物者也回到商场，试穿产品，利用店内促销活动，并进行退货。德勤(Deloitte)美国零售和分销副主席罗德·赛德斯(Rod Sides)表示，这种转变导致零售商放弃了对特定人群的旧观点和假设。</blockquote></p><p> The shifts in strategy during the pandemic put many retailers in a better position for the reopening of malls and downtowns this year—and shoppers were eager to open their wallets.</p><p><blockquote>疫情期间的战略转变使许多零售商在今年购物中心和市中心的重新开放中处于更好的位置——购物者渴望打开钱包。</blockquote></p><p> During the pandemic, some consumers became unexpectedly flush. They got stimulus payments, saved up from a decline in travel expenses, and saw the markets soar. Today, consumer savings at all income levels are at or near a record. Wealthy households are planning to spend 15% more than last year this holiday season, averaging $2,624 per household and driving much of the season’s growth, an annual Deloitte study found.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，一些消费者变得出乎意料地富有。他们获得了刺激付款，从旅行费用下降中节省下来，并看到市场飙升。如今，所有收入水平的消费者储蓄都处于或接近创纪录水平。德勤(Deloitte)的一项年度研究发现，富裕家庭计划在这个假期的支出比去年增加15%，平均每户2,624美元，推动了假期的大部分增长。</blockquote></p><p> “You got a lot of cash and there’s a fair amount of pent-up demand,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.</p><p><blockquote>穆迪分析公司首席经济学家马克·赞迪表示：“你有大量现金，而且有相当多被压抑的需求。”</blockquote></p><p> Retail and food-services sales increased to an estimated $625 billion in September, up 0.7% from October and 13.9% year over year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Sales in retail alone rose 0.8% from August. “We were expecting that you’d see some pullback in September, and we didn’t,” says Citigroup economist Veronica Clark.</p><p><blockquote>根据美国人口普查局的数据，9月份零售和食品服务销售额估计增至6250亿美元，比10月份增长0.7%，同比增长13.9%。仅零售额就比8月份增长了0.8%。花旗集团经济学家维罗妮卡·克拉克(Veronica Clark)表示：“我们预计9月份会出现一些回调，但我们没有。”</blockquote></p><p> Retailers are much healthier than they were a decade ago heading into the holiday season, Matthew Shay, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation, said in a media briefing in October. A yearly&nbsp;Mastercard&nbsp;spending index forecasts U.S. retail sales to increase 7.4% this season, with significant gains in apparel, department stores, jewelry, and luxury items.</p><p><blockquote>全国零售联合会主席兼首席执行官马修·谢伊(Matthew Shay)在10月份的媒体吹风会上表示，进入假期，零售商比十年前健康得多。万事达卡年度支出指数预测，本季美国零售额将增长7.4%，其中服装、百货商店、珠宝和奢侈品将大幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> Luxury retailer&nbsp;Burberry Group&nbsp;(BRBY.UK), known for its tartan fabric and scarves, said this past week that comparable sales for its first half of fiscal 2022 rose 37%, and that full-price sales are growing at a double-digit rate. And&nbsp;Tapestry&nbsp;(TPR), the parent company of Coach, posted better-than-expected fiscal first-quarter earnings, raising its outlook for 2022 sales and profits.</p><p><blockquote>以格子呢面料和围巾闻名的奢侈品零售商博柏利集团(BRBY.UK)上周表示，2022财年上半年可比销售额增长37%，全价销售额正以两位数的速度增长。Coach母公司Tapestry(TPR)公布的第一财季财报好于预期，上调了2022年销售额和利润预期。</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts are bullish on the retail sector, with Cowen saying that “many of the luxury brands have successfully been able to take price increases and will likely benefit from the historically strong consumer balance sheets in the U.S. and internationally.” Wolfe Research favors Nordstrom and Tapestry, among others, with analysts writing in a note that “nearly all the major drivers of U.S. consumer spending favor the high end.”</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师看好零售业，考恩表示，“许多奢侈品牌已经成功地应对了价格上涨，并可能受益于美国和国际上历史上强劲的消费者资产负债表。”Wolfe Research青睐Nordstrom和Tapestry等公司，分析师在一份报告中写道，“美国消费者支出的几乎所有主要驱动因素都青睐高端产品。”</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, more Americans started coming out to the mall. Placer.ai mall-traffic statistics show that foot traffic for indoor malls was up 3% in October compared with 2019 levels, and traffic for outdoor malls was up 5%—one of the reasons mall stores are seeing their stocks soar. Simon Property Group (SPG), which owns the malls themselves, saw its stock gain about 90% in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，更多的美国人开始来到购物中心。Placer.ai购物中心——流量统计显示，与2019年相比，10月份室内购物中心的客流量增长了3%，室外购物中心的客流量增长了5%——这是购物中心商店库存飙升的原因之一。拥有这些购物中心的西蒙地产集团(SPG)的股价在2021年上涨了约90%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “With the combination of more individuals becoming fully vaccinated, paired with many shopping early for the coming holiday season due to supply-chain concerns, we have seen a steady rise in foot traffic since July,” says Lindsay Petak, senior marketing manager for Tysons Corner Center in the Washington region. The mall is owned by Macerich (MAC), which also has seen its share price nearly double this year.</p><p><blockquote>泰森斯高级营销经理林赛·佩塔克(Lindsay Petak)表示：“随着越来越多的人完全接种疫苗，再加上许多人出于供应链担忧为即将到来的假期提前购物，自7月份以来，我们看到客流量稳步上升。”华盛顿地区的角落中心。该购物中心归Macerich(MAC)所有，该公司的股价今年也几乎翻了一番。</blockquote></p><p> All of this added to a stock run-up for the ages for beaten-down retailers. Over the past year, the&nbsp;SPDR S&amp;P Retail&nbsp;exchanged-trade fund (XRT) was up 85%, while the S&amp;P 500 rose 33%. The&nbsp;Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary&nbsp;ETF (RCD) has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by five percentage points this year, a sign that investors remain bullish on retail sales.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都加剧了遭受重创的零售商多年来的股价上涨。过去一年，SPDR S&amp;P零售交易所交易基金(XRT)上涨了85%，而标普500则上涨了33%。景顺标普500等权重非必需消费品ETF（RCD）今年的表现优于标普500 5个百分点，这表明投资者仍然看好零售销售。</blockquote></p><p> “We’ve seen department stores and apparel and discretionary retailers really bounce back as soon as the economy reopened,” the NRF’s Shay says. “Department stores are always a popular destination for the holiday season, based on the consumer survey work we do....They continue to be at the top of the list of the places people shop this year.”</p><p><blockquote>NRF的谢伊说：“我们看到百货商店、服装和非必需消费品零售商在经济重新开放后就真正反弹了。”“根据我们所做的消费者调查工作，百货商店始终是节日期间的热门目的地……它们继续位居今年人们购物场所的榜首。”</blockquote></p><p> All that said, analysts and investors alike remain confident of the role physical stores play, which might look different from their online counterparts, but they’re here to stay.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，分析师和投资者仍然对实体店所扮演的角色充满信心，实体店可能看起来与在线商店不同，但它们将继续存在。</blockquote></p><p> The verdict on whether the retail renaissance is sustainable in the long term isn’t in yet. Retailers are operating in a macroeconomic environment far from the norm, making any guesses even more speculative.</p><p><blockquote>从长远来看，零售业复兴是否可持续还没有定论。零售商在远离正常的宏观经济环境中运营，这使得任何猜测都更具投机性。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think we have normal insight yet because there are just too many complexities throughout the business right now,” says Jefferies analyst Janine Stichter.</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)分析师珍妮·施蒂希特(Janine Stichter)表示：“我认为我们还没有正常的洞察力，因为目前整个业务存在太多复杂性。”</blockquote></p><p> Companies are struggling to manage ongoing supply-chain concerns, inflationary pressures, and a persistent labor shortage, which are likely to bite into earnings despite all signs pointing to a strong holiday quarter. “The supply-chain issues, they’re real,” Horowitz says.</p><p><blockquote>企业正在努力应对持续的供应链担忧、通胀压力和持续的劳动力短缺，尽管所有迹象都表明假日季度表现强劲，但这些问题可能会影响盈利。“供应链问题是真实存在的，”霍洛维茨说。</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie is assuming a modest impact on sales due to supply-chain constraints, with even bigger impacts coming from freight inflation, the company said in its second-quarter earnings call.</p><p><blockquote>Abercrombie在第二季度收益看涨期权中表示，由于供应链限制，该公司预计销售将受到适度影响，而更大的影响来自运费通胀。</blockquote></p><p> To ease supply-chain pressures, retailers are encouraging consumers to start their shopping early—a trend that could skew end-of-year sales data, Citigroup’s Clark says. If shoppers pull their gift-buying forward, there could be a decline in November and December compared with previous years. “It’s not necessarily that spending is much weaker; it’s just that the distribution over months is different,” she says.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团的克拉克表示，为了缓解供应链压力，零售商鼓励消费者尽早开始购物，这一趋势可能会扭曲年终销售数据。如果购物者提前购买礼物，与往年相比，11月和12月的礼物数量可能会有所下降。“这并不一定是支出疲软得多；只是几个月的分布不同，”她说。</blockquote></p><p> On the flip side, low inventories will give retailers higher pricing power that can help offset supply-chain disruptions, Stichter says. While beneficial to retailers, this could drive prices up even more, says Sasha Tomic, an economist at Boston College.</p><p><blockquote>Stichter表示，另一方面，低库存将为零售商提供更高的定价权，有助于抵消供应链中断。波士顿学院经济学家萨沙·托米奇表示，虽然这对零售商有利，但可能会进一步推高价格。</blockquote></p><p> Whatever the risks, strong performance won’t last forever, says Matthew Forester, chief investment officer at BNY Mellon’s Lockwood Advisors. “The U.S. economy, overall, is clearly slowing down,” he says. “And we’re going to slow down into the next year. Plus, as we get back to trend growth, that’s just what’s likely to happen.”</p><p><blockquote>纽约梅隆银行洛克伍德顾问公司首席投资官马修·福雷斯特表示，无论风险如何，强劲的业绩都不会永远持续下去。“总体而言，美国经济明显放缓，”他说。“明年我们将放缓。此外，随着我们恢复趋势增长，这正是可能发生的情况。”</blockquote></p><p> The economy will eventually exit its euphoria as stimulus continues to dwindle, he says. And while the comedown might not be “terrible,” he says, it will still be a decline from where consumer spending is now.</p><p><blockquote>他表示，随着刺激措施的继续减少，经济最终将退出兴奋状态。他表示，虽然下降可能并不“可怕”，但消费者支出仍将较目前有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Abercrombie, though, is powering through the headwinds with the help of its bricks-and-mortar stores. The company is planning to position more inventory in stores, and is routing e-commerce orders to stores as well as partnering with Uber, Shipt, and Postmates to offer same-day delivery.</p><p><blockquote>不过，Abercrombie正在其实体店的帮助下克服逆风。该公司计划在商店放置更多库存，并将电子商务订单发送到商店，并与Uber、Shipt和Postmates合作提供当天送达服务。</blockquote></p><p> Other retailers have taken supply-chain solutions in their own hands. Specialty-apparel company American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) recently announced it was acquiring Quiet Logistics, an operator of automated distribution centers near city centers, just weeks after it bought AirTerra, which focuses on middle-mile logistics—the delivery of products from a warehouse to a retail store.</p><p><blockquote>其他零售商已经将供应链解决方案掌握在自己手中。特种服装公司American Eagle Outfitters(AEO)最近宣布将收购市中心附近自动化配送中心运营商Quiet Logistics，就在几周前，该公司收购了专注于中英里物流（将产品从仓库运送到零售店）的AirTerra。</blockquote></p><p> “We’re going to just continue at it,” Horowitz says.</p><p><blockquote>“我们将继续这样做，”霍洛维茨说。</blockquote></p><p> As retailers forge ahead, doomsayers might have to hold off on heralding a retail apocalypse. For now, the sentiment is clear: Consumers are rediscovering the joys of bricks-and-mortar shopping. The mall has become cool again.</p><p><blockquote>随着零售商的前进，末日预言家可能不得不推迟预示零售业的末日。目前，人们的情绪很明显：消费者正在重新发现实体购物的乐趣。商场又变得凉爽了。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/macys-abercrombie-simon-property-retail-stocks-51636674171?mod=hp_HERO\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","RCD":"READY CAPITAL CORPORATION 9.00% SENIOR NOTES DUE 2029","TPR":"Tapestry Inc.","CAL":"Caleres鞋业","BRBY.UK":"巴宝莉","JWN":"诺德斯特龙","SIG":"西格内特珠宝","M":"梅西百货","ANF":"爱芬奇","WMT":"沃尔玛","BBRYF":"Burberry Group Plc"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/macys-abercrombie-simon-property-retail-stocks-51636674171?mod=hp_HERO","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1159096163","content_text":"By the time the pandemic hit the U.S. economy, the outlook for Abercrombie & Fitch seemed dire.\nOnce a mall staple that captured the hearts and wallets of teenagers with stark, sexy advertising and dark, perfume-drenched stores, Abercrombie’s (ticker: ANF) stock price hit fresh lows in 2017. Shoppers’ distaste for the brand and a steady decrease in mall traffic clouded its future. Then, in March of 2020, the coronavirus began closing malls and stores across the country.\nThe retail apocalypse, it seemed, was about to claim another victim.\nBut something surprising happened on the way to the funeral: Abercrombie enjoyed one of its best years since its 2000s heyday. Under CEO Fran Horowitz, the company rebranded, putting out a more inclusive message and pivoting its focus toward young professionals while fine-tuning its Hollister brand for teenagers.\nRevenue increased 24% year over year in the company’s fiscal second quarter ended July 31, and 3% from prepandemic levels. Its stock is up 120% this year as shoppers flush with cash flock back to stores.\n“Perception of a brand is a hard thing to turn, and it takes time in order to build back trust with your consumer,” Horowitz says in an interview with Barron’s. “So, here we are happy to say in 2021 that we are seeing, obviously, the wonderful effects of all of that hard work.”\nAbercrombie isn’t the only retail brand that is coming into a new period of growth. Over the past year, many of America’s retailers have not only clawed their way out of the abyss, but have harnessed macroeconomic changes ushered in by the pandemic to propel themselves into an unexpected renaissance.\nBrands that successfully merged their bricks-and-mortar operations with digital strategies are seeing sales soar and stock prices rise, lifted by a strong market and consumers champing at the bit to spend their pandemic savings. The stock prices of many major mall-based retailers have soared, including Macy’s (M),Nordstrom (JWN), Famous Footwear parent Caleres (CAL), and Signet Jewelers (SIG), which all gained at least 100% in the past 12 months.\nThese companies are now poised to reap the benefits of a potentially record-setting holiday season. Consumers could spend $851 billion, a 9.5% increase from last year’s record $777 billion and more than twice the 4.4% average increase over the past five years, according to the National Retail Federation.\nNo one knows whether the party will last or whether these stores are simply capturing sales that would have happened in the future. Before retail sales normalize, companies need to navigate a host of supply-chain and inflationary pressures that could put a damper on holiday sales.\nBut the unexpected revival has reaffirmed the faith of many brands in the power of the physical stores. While still heavily investing in online operations, they are continuing to bet big on a bricks-and-mortar future. And as investments in physical stores continue, the demise of the bricks-and-mortar retailer that many once expected no longer seems so certain.\nWealthy households plan to spend an average $2,624 this holiday season, 15% more than last year.\nThe pandemic wasn’t exactly ideal for retailers, but it offered some unique opportunities. The problems were obvious. People were afraid to shop in person. Shoppers—even baby boomers—flocked online in unexpected numbers. Retail behemoths such as Amazon.com (AMZN) and Walmart (WMT) saw their best year ever.\n“The investor sentiment—especially from short term, hedge fund type investors—had just turned very negative on the group,” Columbia Threadneedle Investments retail analyst Mari Shor says. “I just think that investors weren’t really giving the companies, or the consumers, the benefit of the doubt.”\nShor says the doubt among investors was rooted in the notion that traditional retailers, both prepandemic and postpandemic, wouldn’t make it out alive.\nBut the pandemic gave retailers the rare chance to close poorly performing locations and focus on great ones. Many retailers also focused on getting better online, and shifted their sales strategies to target consumers wherever and whenever they wanted to shop—whether online, mobile, or in-store.\nIn one example of a company looking to fuel growth while connecting digital and in-store operations, the parent company of Saks Fifth Avenue spun out its e-commerce arm, which is now expected to go public with a target valuation of $6 billion.\nSuch approaches proved critical. Online and other non-store sales are expected to increase between 11% and 15% this holiday season, potentially reaching a high of $226 billion, according to National Retail Federation estimates.\n“We’d like to think that the pandemic not only accelerated the adoption of e-commerce around the world but also expanded the market,” says Pedro Palandrani, a research analyst at Global X who covers e-commerce.\nAbercrombie invested hundreds of millions of dollars in its digital strategy, emphasizing smooth transitions from digital to in-store experiences with initiatives such as improving the company’s website and instituting in-store returns and pickups for online purchases. The arrival of the pandemic prompted Abercrombie to close 130 stores worldwide and 50% of the brand’s flagships, bringing total store closures in the past 10 years to about 500, while strategically opening a few key new stores, Horowitz says.\n“Stores matter, but they have to be the right size, the right location, and the right economics,” she says. “You put that together with the digital and it equals magic.”\nNot only are physical stores cost-effective ways to draw in-person shoppers, but they also can serve as crucial distribution centers for online pickups and returns, as well as local shipping, says B. Riley Securities analyst Susan Anderson. In recent years, even online retailers such as Warby Parker (WRBY) have expanded their physical presence to accommodate shopper preferences. “The consumer wants to shop when and where they want to,” Anderson says.\nThat behavior can evolve in unexpected ways. Malls and physical stores are growing in popularity among digitally savvy teenagers and young adults.\nAccording to a survey of 1,000 shoppers earlier this year commissioned by BHDP, a design firm that counts retail among its specialties, 55% of 14-to-17 year olds say they are now shopping at indoor malls, and 90% plan to head to a mall in the next year. The 18-to-24-year-old shoppers surveyed are also back at the mall, trying on products, using in-store promotions, and making returns. Such shifts have led retailers to ditch old views and assumptions about specific demographics, says Rod Sides, vice chairman of U.S. retail and distribution at Deloitte.\nThe shifts in strategy during the pandemic put many retailers in a better position for the reopening of malls and downtowns this year—and shoppers were eager to open their wallets.\nDuring the pandemic, some consumers became unexpectedly flush. They got stimulus payments, saved up from a decline in travel expenses, and saw the markets soar. Today, consumer savings at all income levels are at or near a record. Wealthy households are planning to spend 15% more than last year this holiday season, averaging $2,624 per household and driving much of the season’s growth, an annual Deloitte study found.\n“You got a lot of cash and there’s a fair amount of pent-up demand,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.\nRetail and food-services sales increased to an estimated $625 billion in September, up 0.7% from October and 13.9% year over year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Sales in retail alone rose 0.8% from August. “We were expecting that you’d see some pullback in September, and we didn’t,” says Citigroup economist Veronica Clark.\nRetailers are much healthier than they were a decade ago heading into the holiday season, Matthew Shay, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation, said in a media briefing in October. A yearly Mastercard spending index forecasts U.S. retail sales to increase 7.4% this season, with significant gains in apparel, department stores, jewelry, and luxury items.\nLuxury retailer Burberry Group (BRBY.UK), known for its tartan fabric and scarves, said this past week that comparable sales for its first half of fiscal 2022 rose 37%, and that full-price sales are growing at a double-digit rate. And Tapestry (TPR), the parent company of Coach, posted better-than-expected fiscal first-quarter earnings, raising its outlook for 2022 sales and profits.\nSome analysts are bullish on the retail sector, with Cowen saying that “many of the luxury brands have successfully been able to take price increases and will likely benefit from the historically strong consumer balance sheets in the U.S. and internationally.” Wolfe Research favors Nordstrom and Tapestry, among others, with analysts writing in a note that “nearly all the major drivers of U.S. consumer spending favor the high end.”\nMeanwhile, more Americans started coming out to the mall. Placer.ai mall-traffic statistics show that foot traffic for indoor malls was up 3% in October compared with 2019 levels, and traffic for outdoor malls was up 5%—one of the reasons mall stores are seeing their stocks soar. Simon Property Group (SPG), which owns the malls themselves, saw its stock gain about 90% in 2021.\n“With the combination of more individuals becoming fully vaccinated, paired with many shopping early for the coming holiday season due to supply-chain concerns, we have seen a steady rise in foot traffic since July,” says Lindsay Petak, senior marketing manager for Tysons Corner Center in the Washington region. The mall is owned by Macerich (MAC), which also has seen its share price nearly double this year.\nAll of this added to a stock run-up for the ages for beaten-down retailers. Over the past year, the SPDR S&P Retail exchanged-trade fund (XRT) was up 85%, while the S&P 500 rose 33%. The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RCD) has outperformed the S&P 500 by five percentage points this year, a sign that investors remain bullish on retail sales.\n“We’ve seen department stores and apparel and discretionary retailers really bounce back as soon as the economy reopened,” the NRF’s Shay says. “Department stores are always a popular destination for the holiday season, based on the consumer survey work we do....They continue to be at the top of the list of the places people shop this year.”\nAll that said, analysts and investors alike remain confident of the role physical stores play, which might look different from their online counterparts, but they’re here to stay.\nThe verdict on whether the retail renaissance is sustainable in the long term isn’t in yet. Retailers are operating in a macroeconomic environment far from the norm, making any guesses even more speculative.\n“I don’t think we have normal insight yet because there are just too many complexities throughout the business right now,” says Jefferies analyst Janine Stichter.\nCompanies are struggling to manage ongoing supply-chain concerns, inflationary pressures, and a persistent labor shortage, which are likely to bite into earnings despite all signs pointing to a strong holiday quarter. “The supply-chain issues, they’re real,” Horowitz says.\nAbercrombie is assuming a modest impact on sales due to supply-chain constraints, with even bigger impacts coming from freight inflation, the company said in its second-quarter earnings call.\nTo ease supply-chain pressures, retailers are encouraging consumers to start their shopping early—a trend that could skew end-of-year sales data, Citigroup’s Clark says. If shoppers pull their gift-buying forward, there could be a decline in November and December compared with previous years. “It’s not necessarily that spending is much weaker; it’s just that the distribution over months is different,” she says.\nOn the flip side, low inventories will give retailers higher pricing power that can help offset supply-chain disruptions, Stichter says. While beneficial to retailers, this could drive prices up even more, says Sasha Tomic, an economist at Boston College.\nWhatever the risks, strong performance won’t last forever, says Matthew Forester, chief investment officer at BNY Mellon’s Lockwood Advisors. “The U.S. economy, overall, is clearly slowing down,” he says. “And we’re going to slow down into the next year. Plus, as we get back to trend growth, that’s just what’s likely to happen.”\nThe economy will eventually exit its euphoria as stimulus continues to dwindle, he says. And while the comedown might not be “terrible,” he says, it will still be a decline from where consumer spending is now.\nAbercrombie, though, is powering through the headwinds with the help of its bricks-and-mortar stores. The company is planning to position more inventory in stores, and is routing e-commerce orders to stores as well as partnering with Uber, Shipt, and Postmates to offer same-day delivery.\nOther retailers have taken supply-chain solutions in their own hands. Specialty-apparel company American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) recently announced it was acquiring Quiet Logistics, an operator of automated distribution centers near city centers, just weeks after it bought AirTerra, which focuses on middle-mile logistics—the delivery of products from a warehouse to a retail store.\n“We’re going to just continue at it,” Horowitz says.\nAs retailers forge ahead, doomsayers might have to hold off on heralding a retail apocalypse. For now, the sentiment is clear: Consumers are rediscovering the joys of bricks-and-mortar shopping. The mall has become cool again.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TPR":0.9,"BBRYF":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"BRBY.UK":0.9,"SIG":0.9,"M":0.9,"JWN":0.9,"ANF":0.9,"RCD":0.9,"WMT":0.9,"CAL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":748,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":886319304,"gmtCreate":1631550169908,"gmtModify":1631889714007,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/886319304","repostId":"1171919128","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171919128","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631547161,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1171919128?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-13 23:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple App Store: The Tide Is Turning<blockquote>苹果应用商店：潮流正在转向</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171919128","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nA US Federal District Court judge has ruled mostly in Apple’s favor in their case with Epic","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>A US Federal District Court judge has ruled mostly in Apple’s favor in their case with Epic Games.</li>  <li>Despite that, and in conjunction with a recent settlement with Japanese regulators, Apple will be getting rid of their anti-steering rule. This is a bigger change than people think.</li>  <li>The threat to Apple doesn't end with the Epic trial. There are bigger threats coming from the executive and legislative branches in the US, and regulators in Europe and Asia.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/323e8503a813d4996ee819f5591992b8\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images News</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>美国联邦地区法院法官在Epic Games的案件中做出了对苹果有利的裁决。</li><li>尽管如此，加上最近与日本监管机构达成的和解，苹果将取消他们的反转向规则。这是一个比人们想象的更大的变化。</li><li>对苹果的威胁并没有随着史诗般的审判而结束。更大的威胁来自美国的行政和立法部门，以及欧洲和亚洲的监管机构。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社新闻</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>It Does Not End Here</b></p><p><blockquote><b>它并没有就此结束</b></blockquote></p><p> For&nbsp;some time now, I&nbsp;have been warning&nbsp;that&nbsp;antitrust law was about to change, and these changes would not be favorable to Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), and that investors need to take these threats seriously. In every one of these attempts, I was rebuffed in the comments by many Apple shareholders telling me that these fears and warnings were overblown. “Long and strong AAPL!” cheerleading seems to be popular.Confirmation bias&nbsp;is a strong thing, and you should fight it every single day.</p><p><blockquote>一段时间以来，我一直警告反垄断法即将发生变化，这些变化对苹果（纳斯达克股票代码：AAPL）不利，投资者需要认真对待这些威胁。在每一次尝试中，我都遭到了许多苹果股东的拒绝，他们告诉我这些担忧和警告被夸大了。“长而强的AAPL！”啦啦队似乎很受欢迎。确认偏见是一种强烈的东西，你应该每天都与之斗争。</blockquote></p><p> My last attempt was&nbsp;less than two weeks ago, and I was similarly dismissed, and even accused of being a short-selling tout to boot. That last suggestion is pretty funny to anyone who has had to listen to me drone on about Apple stock the last 16 years. The consequence of those 16 years is that I have a lot of Apple stock, so I take things like this very seriously.</p><p><blockquote>我最后一次尝试是在不到两周前，我同样被驳回，甚至被指责为卖空者。对于那些在过去16年里不得不听我喋喋不休地谈论苹果股票的人来说，最后一个建议非常有趣。那16年的后果是我有很多苹果的股票，所以我非常认真地对待这样的事情。</blockquote></p><p> Friday’s decision in Epic v. Apple had one part very bad news for Apple, but mostly a rejection of Epic’s main claim — that iOS is a market unto itself. But the bigger threat continues to be from Congress, where they can change the law in a single session. The House has already passed several bipartisan bills through committee, and three of them seem to have pretty wide support with the rest of the House. A narrower, but just as damaging companion bill is about to start working its way through the Senate. Keep your eyes on Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mike Lee of Utah.</p><p><blockquote>周五Epic诉苹果案的判决对苹果来说有一部分是非常坏的消息，但主要是拒绝了Epic的主要主张——iOS本身就是一个市场。但更大的威胁仍然来自国会，他们可以在一次会议中改变法律。众议院已经通过了几项两党法案，其中三项似乎得到了众议院其他成员的广泛支持。一项范围更窄但同样具有破坏性的配套法案即将开始在参议院通过。请关注明尼苏达州的艾米·克洛布查尔和犹他州的李政颖。</blockquote></p><p> Then we have regulatory action in the EU, Apple’s second most important region, where antitrust enforcers are siding with Spotify(NYSE:SPOT)in their dispute over in-app payments. Apple has already settled with Japan over their anti-steering rules. South Korea is forcing Apple and Google(NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG)to allow third-party in-app payments. China is a black hole of regulatory mystery.</p><p><blockquote>然后，我们在苹果第二重要地区欧盟采取了监管行动，那里的反垄断执法人员在应用内支付纠纷中站在Spotify（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SPOT）一边。苹果已经就日本的反转向规则与日本达成和解。南韩正在迫使苹果和谷歌（纳斯达克：GOOGL）（纳斯达克：GOOG）允许第三方应用内支付。中国是一个监管神秘的黑洞。</blockquote></p><p> The tide is turning on Apple on this issue. If you think this begins and ends with the Epic case, you haven’t been paying attention.</p><p><blockquote>在这个问题上，潮流正在转向苹果。如果你认为这是以史诗般的案件开始和结束的，那你就没有注意到。</blockquote></p><p> Right now the threat is confined to App Store, but this is the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end. This new antitrust movement may come for other parts of Apple, like the other pillar of their fast-growing Services segment, AppleCare, and even dig deeper into the way Apple likes to do business.</p><p><blockquote>目前威胁仅限于App Store，但这是开始的结束，而不是结束的开始。这场新的反垄断运动可能会降临到苹果的其他部门，比如他们快速增长的服务部门的另一个支柱AppleCare，甚至更深入地挖掘苹果喜欢的做生意方式。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What The Ruling Says</b></p><p><blockquote><b>裁决内容</b></blockquote></p><p> Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers hewed very closely to existing law, because that’s what usually happens in District Court, the lowest level of the federal system. She mostly had bad news for Epic, and targeted bad news for Apple.</p><p><blockquote>伊冯娜·冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯法官非常严格地遵守现有法律，因为这通常是联邦系统最低级别的地区法院发生的事情。她主要是给Epic带来坏消息，并针对苹果带来坏消息。</blockquote></p><p> The case rested on how the court defined the “relevant market” in question. Epic wanted it to be iOS, a market unto itself because of the high walls Apple builds around the ecosystem. Judge Rogers rejected that novel claim pretty handily. But she also rejected Apple’s definition: all gaming transactions, including PCs and consoles. She settled on mobile gaming transactions, so essentially the iOS-Android duopoly of mobile gaming transactions.</p><p><blockquote>该案取决于法院如何定义所讨论的“相关市场”。Epic希望它成为iOS，一个独立的市场，因为苹果在生态系统周围筑起了高墙。罗杰斯法官轻而易举地驳回了这一新颖的主张。但她也拒绝了苹果的定义：所有游戏交易，包括PC和主机。她选择了移动游戏交易，所以本质上是移动游戏交易的iOS和Android双头垄断。</blockquote></p><p> Here is the meat of the decision that follows from that:</p><p><blockquote>以下是由此得出的决定的实质：</blockquote></p><p>   Given the trial record, the Court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws. While the Court finds that Apple enjoys considerable market share of over 55% and extraordinarily high profit margins, these factors alone do not show antitrust conduct. Success is not illegal…    Nonetheless, the trial did show that Apple is engaging in anticompetitive conduct under California’s competition laws. The Court concludes that Apple’s anti-steering provisions hide critical information from consumers and illegally stifle consumer choice. When coupled with Apple’s incipient antitrust violations, these anti-steering provisions are anticompetitive and a nationwide remedy to eliminate those provisions is warranted.  The most important thing to note here is that the problem for Apple is California law, not federal law. Federal law changing is where the real threat remains, and we are already well into that process.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于审判记录，法院无法最终得出结论，根据联邦或州反垄断法，苹果是垄断者。虽然法院发现苹果享有超过55%的可观市场份额和极高的利润率，但仅凭这些因素并不表明存在反垄断行为。成功并不违法……尽管如此，审判确实表明苹果参与了加州竞争法下的反竞争行为。法院的结论是，苹果的反转向条款向消费者隐瞒了关键信息，非法扼杀了消费者的选择。再加上苹果初期的反垄断违规行为，这些反转向条款是反竞争的，有必要在全国范围内采取补救措施来消除这些条款。这里最需要注意的是，苹果的问题是加州法律，而不是联邦法律。联邦法律的改变是真正的威胁所在，我们已经进入了这个过程。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Judge Rogers ruled that Apple has to get rid of their anti-steering rules. App developers will now be allowed to inform users of less expensive options on their website, with a link. We’ll talk about the implications in a moment. Apple charges developers 30% for in-app payments, and the first year of in-app subscriptions (15% thereafter). In-app payments and subscriptions are substantially where all of App Store revenue comes from, about 28% of the Services segment and 5.4% of all revenue in calendar 2020.</p><p><blockquote>Rogers法官裁定苹果必须取消他们的反转向规则。应用开发者现在将被允许在他们的网站上通过链接通知用户更便宜的选项。我们一会儿会谈到其中的含义。苹果向开发者收取30%的应用内支付费用，以及第一年的应用内订阅费用（此后收取15%）。应用内支付和订阅基本上是App Store所有收入的来源，约占服务部门的28%，占2020年所有收入的5.4%。</blockquote></p><p> Also, in the category of rounding errors, Epic has to pay Apple the $3.6 million they owe them when they breached their contract. That’s about 0.001% of Apple’s 2021 top line.</p><p><blockquote>此外，在舍入错误类别中，Epic必须向苹果支付他们违反合同时欠他们的360万美元。这约占苹果2021年营收的0.001%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Epic’s Game</b></p><p><blockquote><b>史诗的游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> If you read&nbsp;my first article&nbsp;about the trial from when the pre-trial filings dropped, you may notice that I was a bit confused about what precisely Epic’s game was here. The foundation of their entire argument — that iOS was a market unto itself — was novel, to say the least. At least one of their lawyers must have informed them of the low likelihood of success on their main claims. Moreover, they burned a lot of pages on arguments not central to their case, but seem more geared towards tarnishing Apple’s reputation.</p><p><blockquote>如果你读了我的第一篇关于预审文件撤销时的审判文章，你可能会注意到我对Epic的游戏到底是什么有点困惑。至少可以说，他们整个论点的基础——iOS本身就是一个市场——是新颖的。至少有一名律师必须告知他们主要索赔成功的可能性很低。此外，他们烧毁了很多页的论点，这些论点与他们的案件无关，但似乎更倾向于玷污苹果的声誉。</blockquote></p><p> My current understanding is that this case was a publicity stunt. What’s more, it worked. The point was to get this issue into the public conversation. Here I am writing about it, and here you are reading about it. But more importantly, the tide is turning in Washington, and I think the issues raised by this trial have accelerated that.</p><p><blockquote>我目前的理解是，这个案子是一个宣传噱头。更重要的是，它起作用了。重点是让这个问题进入公众对话。我在这里写它，你在这里读到它。但更重要的是，华盛顿的潮流正在发生转变，我认为这次审判提出的问题加速了这一点。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Anti-Steering Rule</b></p><p><blockquote><b>反转向规则</b></blockquote></p><p> Like many of the App Store rules, the anti-steering rule was part of a multi-year whack-a-mole process where developers tried to find ways to cut out Apple, and Apple closed those holes. Apple fought very hard to keep this rule, but now seems to be capitulating. They settled with Japanese regulators recently on the anti-steering rules as it applied to media subscription apps, and applied the settlement to the rest of the world as well, maybe in anticipation of this ruling. With the Epic ruling, the anti-steering rule is gone.</p><p><blockquote>与许多App Store规则一样，反转向规则是多年打地鼠过程的一部分，开发者试图找到切断苹果的方法，苹果填补了这些漏洞。苹果非常努力地维护这一规则，但现在似乎投降了。他们最近与日本监管机构就适用于媒体订阅应用程序的反转向规则达成了和解，并将和解协议也适用于世界其他地区，也许是对这一裁决的预期。随着史诗般的裁决，反转向规则消失了。</blockquote></p><p> When a game developer like Epic sells their virtual currency on the App Store, they have a 30% payment fee. When they make the same transaction on their website, it is probably under 3%. This was always what this was about. Epic wanted to have their own in-app payment system to supersede Apple’s, without the friction of sending people to the website. Judge Rogers rejected that, but gave Epic a partial victory by banning Apple’s anti-steering rules.</p><p><blockquote>当像Epic这样的游戏开发商在App Store上出售他们的虚拟货币时，他们有30%的支付费用。当他们在自己的网站上进行同样的交易时，大概在3%以下。这一直都是为了这个。Epic希望拥有自己的应用内支付系统来取代苹果的支付系统，而不会出现将人们送到网站的摩擦。Rogers法官驳回了这一要求，但通过禁止苹果的反转向规则，Epic获得了部分胜利。</blockquote></p><p> The anti-steering rules prevented app developers from having text and links to their own much less expensive in-app payments or subscriptions on their websites. This is a real loss for Apple, and puts the whole structure of the two most lucrative payment methods in the App Store at risk.</p><p><blockquote>反转向规则阻止应用程序开发者在其网站上发布文本和链接到他们自己便宜得多的应用内支付或订阅。这对苹果来说是一个真正的损失，并将App Store中最赚钱的两种支付方式的整个结构置于危险之中。</blockquote></p><p> Let’s say a gaming company pays a 2.5% processing fee on their website. That means they have 27.5 percentage points of marketing to play with. They could give that entire 27.5% to users in the form of a rebate or freebies. It certainly increases friction to have to leave a game you're having fun with, but if there is a big, friendly, dark-patterned button that says “Want free money?” I think a lot of people would tap that button. What’s more, they get to book the same amount in revenue, and stick the cost down in sales and marketing.</p><p><blockquote>假设一家游戏公司在其网站上支付2.5%的处理费。这意味着他们有27.5个百分点的营销空间可以利用。他们可以以折扣或免费赠品的形式给用户全部27.5%。不得不离开一个你正在享受的游戏肯定会增加摩擦，但是如果有一个大的、友好的、深色图案的按钮写着“想要免费的钱吗？”我想很多人会点击那个按钮。更重要的是，他们可以记录相同金额的收入，并在销售和营销方面降低成本。</blockquote></p><p> That’s just one example of how companies may decide to go with this. That’s a lot of margin to play with. The reason Apple had this rule in the first place is that they feared someone would find the magic formula that would provide more revenue by eschewing in-app payments altogether, and everyone else would copy them. They had fought very hard to keep this rule for a reason.</p><p><blockquote>这只是公司可能决定采取这种做法的一个例子。这是一个很大的空间。苹果最初制定这条规则的原因是，他们担心有人会找到一个神奇的公式，通过完全避开应用内支付来提供更多收入，而其他人都会效仿他们。他们努力维护这条规则是有原因的。</blockquote></p><p> Just after the news broke, a friend who knows&nbsp;I own both stocks&nbsp;trolled me with this Bloomberg Terminal screenshot:</p><p><blockquote>消息传出后，一位知道我拥有这两只股票的朋友用这张彭博终端截图向我进行了攻击：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78570d7ae73401a933b2359f3dcd47da\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"281\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Roblox(NYSE:RBLX)is a pure-play mobile gaming company. The vast majority of their revenues come from in-app payments from iOS and Android, the rest from their website sales. Their cost-of-revenues almost all goes to Apple and Google. In the TTM, they had a 74.4% gross margin. If they pay a 2.5% processing fee for website sales, that means 84% of their transaction value was through iOS and Android. If they could get that to 50-50, that would raise all their margins down to EBT by 10 percentage points. If they could get to 73% of sales on the website, they would have a 90% gross margin.</p><p><blockquote>Roblox（纽约证券交易所股票代码：RBLX）是一家纯粹的移动游戏公司。他们的绝大多数收入来自iOS和Android的应用内支付，其余来自网站销售。他们的收入成本几乎全部归苹果和谷歌所有。在TTM，他们的毛利率为74.4%。如果他们为网站销售支付2.5%的处理费，这意味着他们84%的交易价值是通过iOS和Android进行的。如果他们能够将这一比例提高到50-50，那么他们在EBT的所有利润率将提高10个百分点。如果他们能在网站上获得73%的销售额，他们将有90%的毛利率。</blockquote></p><p> There is a lot of money at stake, and a huge incentive for gaming and subscription media companies to figure out how to thread this needle. And that’s all in the absence of further action by the other two branches of government.</p><p><blockquote>这关系到大量的资金，游戏和订阅媒体公司也有巨大的动力去想办法解决这个问题。这一切都是在其他两个政府部门没有采取进一步行动的情况下发生的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Executive Branch</b></p><p><blockquote><b>行政部门</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> This is a good place to discuss the theoretical underpinnings of the new antitrust movement, because two of its leaders now work in the Biden administration. The movement is sometimes referred to as the “neo-Brandeis” movement after Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, because it harkens back to a much earlier era of antitrust enforcement that drastically changed in the 1980s.</p><p><blockquote>这是讨论新反垄断运动理论基础的好地方，因为其两位领导人现在在拜登政府工作。这场运动有时被称为“新布兰代斯”运动，以最高法院大法官路易斯·布兰代斯的名字命名，因为它可以追溯到更早的反垄断执法时代，该时代在20世纪80年代发生了巨大变化。</blockquote></p><p> In 1978, Robert Bork (yes,that Robert Bork) wrote a very influential book called&nbsp;<i>The Antitrust Paradox</i>. His theory urged a refocusing of enforcement away from competition, and towards consumer benefit as the main test. He argued that antitrust enforcement was propping up smaller, less efficient companies to the detriment of the economy.</p><p><blockquote>1978年，罗伯特·博克（没错，就是那个罗伯特·博克）写了一本非常有影响力的书，叫做<i>反垄断悖论</i>他的理论敦促将执法重点从竞争转向消费者利益作为主要测试。他认为，反垄断执法正在支撑规模较小、效率较低的公司，损害了经济。</blockquote></p><p> The 1982 AT&amp;T breakup consent decree became the prototype for the new enforcement. By controlling local and long distance telecommunication, as well as the equipment, AT&amp;T had been underinvesting and overcharging for decades. Their breakup brought an explosion of investment into telecommunications, and brought down prices quickly for landline service and equipment. That became the limit of antitrust enforcement.</p><p><blockquote>1982年美国电话电报公司分手同意法令成为新执法的原型。通过控制本地和长途电信以及设备，美国电话电报公司几十年来一直投资不足，收费过高。他们的分手带来了电信投资的爆炸式增长，并迅速降低了固定电话服务和设备的价格。这成为反垄断执法的极限。</blockquote></p><p> But the focus on consumer benefit has affected competition, and that’s what the neo-Brandeis movement hopes to change. They want antitrust enforcement to return to the way it was a century ago, with more of a focus on how large companies affect competition. Lina Khan, a law professor at Columbia, now runs the FTC, the primary antitrust enforcer in the federal government. Her 2017 law review article, “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” was the spark that lit this fire. Her colleague at Columbia Law, Tim Wu, is also one of the leaders of this movement. He is a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, and his fingerprints are all over&nbsp;the July competition executive order.</p><p><blockquote>但是对消费者利益的关注影响了竞争，这就是新布兰代斯运动希望改变的。他们希望反垄断执法回到一个世纪前的样子，更多地关注大公司如何影响竞争。哥伦比亚大学法学教授莉娜·汗(Lina Khan)现在负责联邦政府主要的反垄断执法机构联邦贸易委员会(FTC)。她2017年的法律评论文章《亚马逊的反垄断悖论》是点燃这场大火的火花。她在哥伦比亚法学院的同事蒂姆·吴也是这场运动的领导者之一。他是白宫经济顾问委员会的成员，7月份的竞争行政命令上到处都是他的指纹。</blockquote></p><p> The order was very wide ranging, with 72 initiatives covering 14 departments and agencies. Most of it does not relate to Apple, but it gives you an idea of the wide breadth of the order. As it relates to Apple:</p><p><blockquote>该命令范围非常广泛，有72项举措，涵盖14个部门和机构。它的大部分与苹果无关，但它让你对秩序的广度有所了解。就苹果而言：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Right-to-repair is a huge threat to the other pillar of Services, AppleCare, which I estimate at 25%-30% of the segment. But more than that, it would change the way Apple makes devices. Apple squeezes out efficiency gains by attaching pooled memory directly to the main processor die, and by soldering storage into the motherboard. Both of these would likely be prohibited to them, and the devices would suffer.</li>  <li>The FTC is two months into a yearlong frisk of the mobile app ecosystem. Based on previous writings, Lina Khan will likely recommend third party app stores, “sideloading” directly from the web, and an end to the in-app payments monopoly.</li> </ul> Executive branch action is always subject to court challenges, and they can take very long to implement. But Congress can change the law in a single session. And they are already into that process.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>维修权对服务的另一个支柱AppleCare来说是一个巨大的威胁，我估计AppleCare占该细分市场的25%-30%。但更重要的是，它将改变苹果制造设备的方式。苹果通过将池内存直接连接到主处理器芯片，以及将存储焊接到主板来挤出效率增益。这两种方法都可能被禁止，这些设备也会受到影响。</li><li>联邦贸易委员会对移动应用生态系统长达一年的搜查已经进行了两个月。根据之前的著作，Lina Khan可能会推荐第三方应用商店，直接从网络“侧装”，并结束应用内支付垄断。</li></ul>行政部门的行动总是受到法院的质疑，而且可能需要很长时间才能实施。但是国会可以在一届会议上改变法律。他们已经进入了这个过程。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Legislative Branch</b></p><p><blockquote><b>立法部门</b></blockquote></p><p> Since there are two houses of Congress, this issue is off on two tracks. The House Judiciary Committee recently passed a suite of bipartisan bills. Of the ones that I think have a good likelihood of passing the full House, here’s how it affects Apple:</p><p><blockquote>由于国会有两院，这个问题在两条轨道上。众议院司法委员会最近通过了一系列两党法案。在我认为很有可能获得全院通过的法案中，以下是它对苹果的影响：</blockquote></p><p> They would be required to allow third party app stores, sideloading, and third party payments in the Apple App Store.</p><p><blockquote>他们将被要求允许苹果应用商店中的第三方应用商店、侧装和第三方支付。</blockquote></p><p> Restricting Apple’s ability to acquire smaller companies. In the past 6 years, Apple has bought around 100 companies, which works out to about one every three weeks on average. It looks like they had been accelerating since fiscal 2018, but then abruptly stopped in fiscal 2021. The reason is the new leader of the FTC.</p><p><blockquote>限制苹果收购小公司的能力。在过去的6年里，苹果收购了大约100家公司，平均每三周就收购一家。看起来他们自2018财年以来一直在加速，但在2021财年突然停止。原因是FTC的新领导人。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2fc9a2578663cc746fdb19ca19dea4c\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The big bulge you see there in 2014 is the Beats acquisition at $3 billion, which remains the exception. Otherwise, Apple buys very small companies for tens or hundreds of millions, usually shuts down any products they may have, and absorbs the talent and IP into Apple proper. Apple’s chip design unit, a cornerstone of their current success, began this way in 2008.</p><p><blockquote>你在2014年看到的最大增长是以30亿美元收购Beats，这仍然是个例外。否则，苹果会花数千万或数亿美元收购非常小的公司，通常会关闭他们可能拥有的任何产品，并将人才和知识产权吸收到苹果本土。苹果的芯片设计部门是他们目前成功的基石，2008年就是这样开始的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>No more private APIs.</b>This would mean everything, like the Apple Pay-enabling NFC chip, would be open to competitors.</p><p><blockquote><b>不再有私有API。</b>这意味着一切，比如支持苹果支付的NFC芯片，都将向竞争对手开放。</blockquote></p><p> <b>No more discriminatory rules.</b>Apple doesn’t force real-world product and service providers like Uber(NYSE:UBER)to use in-app payments. Apple would either have to try and get Uber to pay them 30%, or drop the requirement altogether.</p><p><blockquote><b>不再有歧视性的规则。</b>苹果不会强迫Uber（纽约证券交易所股票代码：UBER）等现实世界的产品和服务提供商使用应用内支付。苹果要么试图让优步向他们支付30%的费用，要么完全放弃这一要求。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The end of the Google search deal.</b>Google currently pays Apple a purported $12 billion a year to make Google the default search engine on iOS. This cash goes directly to EBT.</p><p><blockquote><b>谷歌搜索交易的结束。</b>谷歌目前据称每年向苹果支付120亿美元，以使谷歌成为iOS上的默认搜索引擎。这笔现金直接流向EBT。</blockquote></p><p> <b>They would have to expose more user data to developers.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>他们将不得不向开发者公开更多的用户数据。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Formalizing the anti-steering decision.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>正式确定反转向决策。</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Anti-retaliation provision.</b>If these bills were law, Epic would still be on the App Store while they sued Apple.</p><p><blockquote><b>反报复条款。</b>如果这些法案成为法律，当他们起诉苹果时，Epic仍将在App Store上。</blockquote></p><p> After the House is done wrangling over budget reconciliation, I think these bills will hit the House floor this fall or winter, and I think that they have a high likelihood of passing in something like their current form.</p><p><blockquote>在众议院结束关于预算协调的争论后，我认为这些法案将在今年秋天或冬天提交众议院，我认为它们很有可能以目前的形式获得通过。</blockquote></p><p> But bills also have to clear the Senate, and they move slower. Things are just getting started there. The big movers in the Senate are Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mike Lee of Utah. Klobuchar has&nbsp;written a long book&nbsp;on the subject, and it is not friendly towards Apple. She has also authored a new bill, Open App Markets Act. It is more narrow than the House suite, but not by much. It would still force Apple to allow third party app stores, sideloading, and third party in-app payments. They would also have to get rid of their private APIs. The bill is narrower than the House suite, and less of a threat to Apple, but still would mean the end of App Store as a driver of growth.<i>The Senate bill is the better outcome for Apple, and it is still terrible.</i></p><p><blockquote>但法案也必须通过参议院，而且进展较慢。那里的事情才刚刚开始。参议院的大推动者是明尼苏达州的艾米·克洛布查尔和犹他州的李政颖。Klobuchar就这个问题写了一本长书，它对苹果并不友好。她还起草了一项新法案《开放应用市场法案》。它比房子套房窄，但也窄不了多少。它仍将迫使苹果允许第三方应用商店、侧装和第三方应用内支付。他们还必须摆脱他们的私有API。该法案比众议院套房更窄，对苹果的威胁也更小，但仍意味着App Store作为增长驱动力的终结。<i>参议院的法案对苹果来说是更好的结果，但仍然很糟糕。</i></blockquote></p><p> I believe that we will see something pass before the next Presidential election, or even in this Congressional session. The best Apple shareholders can hope for is that the final bill gets watered down considerably.</p><p><blockquote>我相信，在下届总统选举之前，甚至在本届国会会议上，我们会看到一些事情通过。苹果股东最大的希望就是最终法案被大幅淡化。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Outside The US</b></p><p><blockquote><b>美国境外</b></blockquote></p><p> This is in no way limited to the US. We already discussed the Japanese settlement, and South Korea is forcing Apple and Google to allow third party in-app payments. The case that is farthest along in the EU is Spotify’s, which would force Apple to not charge fees to competing services, so that means music, podcasts, games, video and fitness.</p><p><blockquote>这绝不仅限于美国。我们已经讨论了日本的和解，南韩正在迫使苹果和谷歌允许第三方应用内支付。欧盟进展最快的案例是Spotify，这将迫使苹果不向竞争服务收费，因此这意味着音乐、播客、游戏、视频和健身。</blockquote></p><p> The Chinese Communist Party remains the&nbsp;second biggest tail risk in the world&nbsp;after climate change. Apple’s regulatory risk there is uniquely high, both on the supply and demand sides. Apple has already given into them by not providing their Chinese customers with the same level of privacy as everyone else. With the mood in China right now, who knows where that goes.</p><p><blockquote>中国共产党仍然是仅次于气候变化的世界第二大尾部风险。无论是在供应还是需求方面，苹果的监管风险都非常高。苹果已经屈服于他们，没有向他们的中国客户提供和其他人一样的隐私水平。以中国现在的情绪，谁知道会走向何方。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Losing Control Of App Store Looks Like</b></p><p><blockquote><b>失去对App Store的控制是什么样子</b></blockquote></p><p> Stone Fox Capital here at Seeking Alpha is&nbsp;out with an article&nbsp;pivoting off Katy Huberty's estimation of a 2% earnings loss if the top 20 apps on the App Store were able to eschew in-app payments. Stone Fox would also like you to care about that seemingly small number:</p><p><blockquote>Seeking Alpha的Stone Fox Capital发表了一篇文章，反驳了Katy Huberty的估计，如果App Store上排名前20的应用程序能够避免应用内支付，收益将损失2%。石狐也想让你关心一下这个看似很小的数字：</blockquote></p><p>   Apple won most of their legal case with Epic Games based on the ruling announced on September 10, but the tech giant lost the ultimate battle. The stock remains priced for perfection while the company continues to have growth paths chipped away from the business.  My last article on this subject was called “Chipping Away at App Store.” This is what is happening and the trend is now clear. There is a mood globally to take Apple down a peg, and it is happening too slowly for many people to realize it is happening.</p><p><blockquote>根据9月10日宣布的裁决，苹果赢得了与Epic Games的大部分法律诉讼，但这家科技巨头输掉了最终的战斗。该股的定价仍然是完美的，而该公司的增长道路继续从业务中被削弱。我上一篇关于这个主题的文章叫做“在App Store上削足适履”。这就是正在发生的事情，趋势现在很明显。全球都有一种降低苹果汇率的情绪，但这种情绪发生得太慢，许多人都没有意识到它正在发生。</blockquote></p><p> My own way of modeling the worst case is through my DCF model. It’s modeled as a 25% hit to Services in the first year, with services gross margin reduced from 68% to 65%, followed by a slightly increased growth rate in the segment because of composition effects — the rest of Services grows faster than App Store. I used to model that happening in fiscal 2024, but I have moved that up to fiscal 2023, beginning less than 13 months from now.</p><p><blockquote>我自己对最坏情况建模的方法是通过我的DCF模型。它的模型是第一年服务受到25%的打击，服务毛利率从68%下降到65%，随后由于构成效应，该细分市场的增长率略有上升——其余服务的增长速度快于App Store。我曾经对2024财年发生的情况进行建模，但我已将其提前到2023财年，从现在开始不到13个月。</blockquote></p><p> Here is the effect on fair value on my base case:</p><p><blockquote>以下是我的基本案例对公允价值的影响：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/94b635fe7a2473aafe36bd095a1206b6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"352\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Even with the very slow start for the reason Stone Fox says — the share price has gotten way out ahead of cash flows — my base case still shows an 11% CAGR in fair value through the end of fiscal 2025. The App Store collapse takes that down to an 8% CAGR, 12% lower by 2025.</p><p><blockquote>尽管由于Stone Fox所说的原因，起步非常缓慢——股价已经远远领先于现金流——但我的基本假设仍然显示，到2025财年末，公允价值复合年增长率为11%。App Store的倒闭使复合年增长率降至8%，到2025年将下降12%。</blockquote></p><p> Circling back, Stone Fox puts a button on this more succinctly than I can:</p><p><blockquote>回头，石狐比我更简洁地按下了一个按钮：</blockquote></p><p>   The key investor takeaway is that Apple has a bright future. The company will continue generating profits with operating cash flows topping $100 billion annually, but the tech giant will struggle to generate the growth needed to warrant the current stock price. The 2% hit to earnings might not seem meaningful, but the amount is very harmful to a stock priced for perfection.  <b>How To Take This Seriously</b></p><p><blockquote>投资者的主要收获是苹果拥有光明的未来。该公司将继续创造利润，每年运营现金流超过1000亿美元，但这家科技巨头将难以实现维持当前股价所需的增长。盈利2%的打击似乎没有意义，但这个数额对于定价完美的股票来说是非常有害的。<b>如何认真对待这个</b></blockquote></p><p> In my last article on this subject, someone cheekily replied in the comments, “‘Please take this seriously.’ What does that even mean?” That’s a good question. The first part of the answer is to stop pretending it’s not happening.</p><p><blockquote>在我关于这个主题的上一篇文章中，有人在评论中厚颜无耻地回答说：“‘请认真对待这件事。’这到底是什么意思？”这是个好问题。答案的第一部分是不要假装它没有发生。</blockquote></p><p> “If your time horizon is short, now is a good time to take profits.” I have been using that phrase frequently since Apple hit $140. The last chart just formalizes it with math, but my opinion is that Apple will remain range-bound for some time, between $125 and $155, roughly. I still mean it: if your time horizon is short, now is a good time to take profits.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你的时间范围很短，现在是获利了结的好时机。”自从苹果股价达到140美元以来，我就经常使用这个短语。最后一张图表只是用数学将其形式化，但我的观点是苹果将在一段时间内保持区间波动，大约在125美元到155美元之间。我还是这个意思：如果你的时间范围很短，现在是获利了结的好时机。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But I also believe that no other company is as prepared for the future of technology, regardless of what that brings. That is a&nbsp;far longer discussion. I have been buying Apple shares on the dip since 2005, which is two splits ago. My last buy was in January 2019, when Apple reported that they would miss guidance for the first time in many years. At the time, the commentariat was telling me that Apple’s best days were behind them. I tried to explain that Apple was in a transitional phase, part of a strategy they launched around 2015 to focus more on the growth of the iPhone user base than sales. The strategy would pay off soon, I predicted, and it did in fiscal 2021. That seems like a very long time ago now.</p><p><blockquote>但我也相信，没有其他公司为技术的未来做好了准备，无论它会带来什么。这是一个长得多的讨论。自2005年以来，我一直在逢低买入苹果股票，这是两次拆分前。我最后一次购买是在2019年1月，当时苹果报告称他们将多年来首次错过指导。当时，评论员告诉我，苹果最好的日子已经过去了。我试图解释说，苹果正处于过渡阶段，这是他们在2015年左右推出的战略的一部分，旨在更多地关注iPhone用户群的增长，而不是销售。我预测，这一策略很快就会得到回报，并且在2021财年就得到了回报。那似乎是很久以前的事了。</blockquote></p><p> A consequence of buying the dip from 2005 to 2019 is that I own way too many Apple shares that I could never bring myself to sell. I am massively overweight Apple. There is a “What To Do With The Apple Shares” clause in my will. It is our largest asset, worth more than the house. That has not made me nervous until the last few months, when the tide seemed to start turning on Apple on this issue. I also used to be someone who did not take this threat seriously. I am going to start shaving my position as opportunities present themselves, and one may happen this week with the iPhone launch on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>从2005年到2019年逢低买入的一个后果是，我拥有太多苹果股票，我永远无法出售。我完全是跑赢大盘·苹果。我的遗嘱里有一个“如何处理苹果股票”的条款。这是我们最大的资产，比房子还值钱。这并没有让我感到紧张，直到最近几个月，在这个问题上，潮流似乎开始转向苹果。我也曾经是一个不把这种威胁当回事的人。随着机会的出现，我将开始削减我的职位，其中一个可能会在本周周二iPhone的发布中发生。</blockquote></p><p> <i>To be clear, I will remain overweight Apple, just less so, and I remain bullish in the long term. But I no longer feel the safety I once did with this wildly overweight position.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>需要明确的是，我仍将是跑赢大盘·苹果，只是程度有所降低，而且从长远来看，我仍然看好。但是我不再感觉到曾经在这个疯狂的跑赢大盘位置上的安全感。</i></blockquote></p><p> In contrast, if you are a long term investor who does not have a massively overweight position, watch, wait and fight confirmation bias every day. If you think this begins and ends with Epic, you haven’t been paying attention.</p><p><blockquote>相比之下，如果您是一位没有大量跑赢大盘头寸的长期投资者，请每天观察、等待并对抗确认偏差。如果你认为这是以史诗开始和结束的，那你就没有注意。</blockquote></p><p> Please take this seriously.</p><p><blockquote>请认真对待这件事。</blockquote></p><p> I will be back in a few days with hopefully happier news from the iPhone launch on Tuesday. The big question is whether Apple can begin shipping iPhone before the quarter is out.</p><p><blockquote>几天后我会带着周二iPhone发布会的好消息回来。最大的问题是苹果能否在本季度结束前开始发货iPhone。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple App Store: The Tide Is Turning<blockquote>苹果应用商店：潮流正在转向</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple App Store: The Tide Is Turning<blockquote>苹果应用商店：潮流正在转向</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-09-13 23:32</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>A US Federal District Court judge has ruled mostly in Apple’s favor in their case with Epic Games.</li>  <li>Despite that, and in conjunction with a recent settlement with Japanese regulators, Apple will be getting rid of their anti-steering rule. This is a bigger change than people think.</li>  <li>The threat to Apple doesn't end with the Epic trial. There are bigger threats coming from the executive and legislative branches in the US, and regulators in Europe and Asia.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/323e8503a813d4996ee819f5591992b8\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images News</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>美国联邦地区法院法官在Epic Games的案件中做出了对苹果有利的裁决。</li><li>尽管如此，加上最近与日本监管机构达成的和解，苹果将取消他们的反转向规则。这是一个比人们想象的更大的变化。</li><li>对苹果的威胁并没有随着史诗般的审判而结束。更大的威胁来自美国的行政和立法部门，以及欧洲和亚洲的监管机构。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社新闻</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>It Does Not End Here</b></p><p><blockquote><b>它并没有就此结束</b></blockquote></p><p> For&nbsp;some time now, I&nbsp;have been warning&nbsp;that&nbsp;antitrust law was about to change, and these changes would not be favorable to Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), and that investors need to take these threats seriously. In every one of these attempts, I was rebuffed in the comments by many Apple shareholders telling me that these fears and warnings were overblown. “Long and strong AAPL!” cheerleading seems to be popular.Confirmation bias&nbsp;is a strong thing, and you should fight it every single day.</p><p><blockquote>一段时间以来，我一直警告反垄断法即将发生变化，这些变化对苹果（纳斯达克股票代码：AAPL）不利，投资者需要认真对待这些威胁。在每一次尝试中，我都遭到了许多苹果股东的拒绝，他们告诉我这些担忧和警告被夸大了。“长而强的AAPL！”啦啦队似乎很受欢迎。确认偏见是一种强烈的东西，你应该每天都与之斗争。</blockquote></p><p> My last attempt was&nbsp;less than two weeks ago, and I was similarly dismissed, and even accused of being a short-selling tout to boot. That last suggestion is pretty funny to anyone who has had to listen to me drone on about Apple stock the last 16 years. The consequence of those 16 years is that I have a lot of Apple stock, so I take things like this very seriously.</p><p><blockquote>我最后一次尝试是在不到两周前，我同样被驳回，甚至被指责为卖空者。对于那些在过去16年里不得不听我喋喋不休地谈论苹果股票的人来说，最后一个建议非常有趣。那16年的后果是我有很多苹果的股票，所以我非常认真地对待这样的事情。</blockquote></p><p> Friday’s decision in Epic v. Apple had one part very bad news for Apple, but mostly a rejection of Epic’s main claim — that iOS is a market unto itself. But the bigger threat continues to be from Congress, where they can change the law in a single session. The House has already passed several bipartisan bills through committee, and three of them seem to have pretty wide support with the rest of the House. A narrower, but just as damaging companion bill is about to start working its way through the Senate. Keep your eyes on Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mike Lee of Utah.</p><p><blockquote>周五Epic诉苹果案的判决对苹果来说有一部分是非常坏的消息，但主要是拒绝了Epic的主要主张——iOS本身就是一个市场。但更大的威胁仍然来自国会，他们可以在一次会议中改变法律。众议院已经通过了几项两党法案，其中三项似乎得到了众议院其他成员的广泛支持。一项范围更窄但同样具有破坏性的配套法案即将开始在参议院通过。请关注明尼苏达州的艾米·克洛布查尔和犹他州的李政颖。</blockquote></p><p> Then we have regulatory action in the EU, Apple’s second most important region, where antitrust enforcers are siding with Spotify(NYSE:SPOT)in their dispute over in-app payments. Apple has already settled with Japan over their anti-steering rules. South Korea is forcing Apple and Google(NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG)to allow third-party in-app payments. China is a black hole of regulatory mystery.</p><p><blockquote>然后，我们在苹果第二重要地区欧盟采取了监管行动，那里的反垄断执法人员在应用内支付纠纷中站在Spotify（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SPOT）一边。苹果已经就日本的反转向规则与日本达成和解。南韩正在迫使苹果和谷歌（纳斯达克：GOOGL）（纳斯达克：GOOG）允许第三方应用内支付。中国是一个监管神秘的黑洞。</blockquote></p><p> The tide is turning on Apple on this issue. If you think this begins and ends with the Epic case, you haven’t been paying attention.</p><p><blockquote>在这个问题上，潮流正在转向苹果。如果你认为这是以史诗般的案件开始和结束的，那你就没有注意到。</blockquote></p><p> Right now the threat is confined to App Store, but this is the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end. This new antitrust movement may come for other parts of Apple, like the other pillar of their fast-growing Services segment, AppleCare, and even dig deeper into the way Apple likes to do business.</p><p><blockquote>目前威胁仅限于App Store，但这是开始的结束，而不是结束的开始。这场新的反垄断运动可能会降临到苹果的其他部门，比如他们快速增长的服务部门的另一个支柱AppleCare，甚至更深入地挖掘苹果喜欢的做生意方式。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What The Ruling Says</b></p><p><blockquote><b>裁决内容</b></blockquote></p><p> Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers hewed very closely to existing law, because that’s what usually happens in District Court, the lowest level of the federal system. She mostly had bad news for Epic, and targeted bad news for Apple.</p><p><blockquote>伊冯娜·冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯法官非常严格地遵守现有法律，因为这通常是联邦系统最低级别的地区法院发生的事情。她主要是给Epic带来坏消息，并针对苹果带来坏消息。</blockquote></p><p> The case rested on how the court defined the “relevant market” in question. Epic wanted it to be iOS, a market unto itself because of the high walls Apple builds around the ecosystem. Judge Rogers rejected that novel claim pretty handily. But she also rejected Apple’s definition: all gaming transactions, including PCs and consoles. She settled on mobile gaming transactions, so essentially the iOS-Android duopoly of mobile gaming transactions.</p><p><blockquote>该案取决于法院如何定义所讨论的“相关市场”。Epic希望它成为iOS，一个独立的市场，因为苹果在生态系统周围筑起了高墙。罗杰斯法官轻而易举地驳回了这一新颖的主张。但她也拒绝了苹果的定义：所有游戏交易，包括PC和主机。她选择了移动游戏交易，所以本质上是移动游戏交易的iOS和Android双头垄断。</blockquote></p><p> Here is the meat of the decision that follows from that:</p><p><blockquote>以下是由此得出的决定的实质：</blockquote></p><p>   Given the trial record, the Court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws. While the Court finds that Apple enjoys considerable market share of over 55% and extraordinarily high profit margins, these factors alone do not show antitrust conduct. Success is not illegal…    Nonetheless, the trial did show that Apple is engaging in anticompetitive conduct under California’s competition laws. The Court concludes that Apple’s anti-steering provisions hide critical information from consumers and illegally stifle consumer choice. When coupled with Apple’s incipient antitrust violations, these anti-steering provisions are anticompetitive and a nationwide remedy to eliminate those provisions is warranted.  The most important thing to note here is that the problem for Apple is California law, not federal law. Federal law changing is where the real threat remains, and we are already well into that process.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于审判记录，法院无法最终得出结论，根据联邦或州反垄断法，苹果是垄断者。虽然法院发现苹果享有超过55%的可观市场份额和极高的利润率，但仅凭这些因素并不表明存在反垄断行为。成功并不违法……尽管如此，审判确实表明苹果参与了加州竞争法下的反竞争行为。法院的结论是，苹果的反转向条款向消费者隐瞒了关键信息，非法扼杀了消费者的选择。再加上苹果初期的反垄断违规行为，这些反转向条款是反竞争的，有必要在全国范围内采取补救措施来消除这些条款。这里最需要注意的是，苹果的问题是加州法律，而不是联邦法律。联邦法律的改变是真正的威胁所在，我们已经进入了这个过程。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Judge Rogers ruled that Apple has to get rid of their anti-steering rules. App developers will now be allowed to inform users of less expensive options on their website, with a link. We’ll talk about the implications in a moment. Apple charges developers 30% for in-app payments, and the first year of in-app subscriptions (15% thereafter). In-app payments and subscriptions are substantially where all of App Store revenue comes from, about 28% of the Services segment and 5.4% of all revenue in calendar 2020.</p><p><blockquote>Rogers法官裁定苹果必须取消他们的反转向规则。应用开发者现在将被允许在他们的网站上通过链接通知用户更便宜的选项。我们一会儿会谈到其中的含义。苹果向开发者收取30%的应用内支付费用，以及第一年的应用内订阅费用（此后收取15%）。应用内支付和订阅基本上是App Store所有收入的来源，约占服务部门的28%，占2020年所有收入的5.4%。</blockquote></p><p> Also, in the category of rounding errors, Epic has to pay Apple the $3.6 million they owe them when they breached their contract. That’s about 0.001% of Apple’s 2021 top line.</p><p><blockquote>此外，在舍入错误类别中，Epic必须向苹果支付他们违反合同时欠他们的360万美元。这约占苹果2021年营收的0.001%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Epic’s Game</b></p><p><blockquote><b>史诗的游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> If you read&nbsp;my first article&nbsp;about the trial from when the pre-trial filings dropped, you may notice that I was a bit confused about what precisely Epic’s game was here. The foundation of their entire argument — that iOS was a market unto itself — was novel, to say the least. At least one of their lawyers must have informed them of the low likelihood of success on their main claims. Moreover, they burned a lot of pages on arguments not central to their case, but seem more geared towards tarnishing Apple’s reputation.</p><p><blockquote>如果你读了我的第一篇关于预审文件撤销时的审判文章，你可能会注意到我对Epic的游戏到底是什么有点困惑。至少可以说，他们整个论点的基础——iOS本身就是一个市场——是新颖的。至少有一名律师必须告知他们主要索赔成功的可能性很低。此外，他们烧毁了很多页的论点，这些论点与他们的案件无关，但似乎更倾向于玷污苹果的声誉。</blockquote></p><p> My current understanding is that this case was a publicity stunt. What’s more, it worked. The point was to get this issue into the public conversation. Here I am writing about it, and here you are reading about it. But more importantly, the tide is turning in Washington, and I think the issues raised by this trial have accelerated that.</p><p><blockquote>我目前的理解是，这个案子是一个宣传噱头。更重要的是，它起作用了。重点是让这个问题进入公众对话。我在这里写它，你在这里读到它。但更重要的是，华盛顿的潮流正在发生转变，我认为这次审判提出的问题加速了这一点。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Anti-Steering Rule</b></p><p><blockquote><b>反转向规则</b></blockquote></p><p> Like many of the App Store rules, the anti-steering rule was part of a multi-year whack-a-mole process where developers tried to find ways to cut out Apple, and Apple closed those holes. Apple fought very hard to keep this rule, but now seems to be capitulating. They settled with Japanese regulators recently on the anti-steering rules as it applied to media subscription apps, and applied the settlement to the rest of the world as well, maybe in anticipation of this ruling. With the Epic ruling, the anti-steering rule is gone.</p><p><blockquote>与许多App Store规则一样，反转向规则是多年打地鼠过程的一部分，开发者试图找到切断苹果的方法，苹果填补了这些漏洞。苹果非常努力地维护这一规则，但现在似乎投降了。他们最近与日本监管机构就适用于媒体订阅应用程序的反转向规则达成了和解，并将和解协议也适用于世界其他地区，也许是对这一裁决的预期。随着史诗般的裁决，反转向规则消失了。</blockquote></p><p> When a game developer like Epic sells their virtual currency on the App Store, they have a 30% payment fee. When they make the same transaction on their website, it is probably under 3%. This was always what this was about. Epic wanted to have their own in-app payment system to supersede Apple’s, without the friction of sending people to the website. Judge Rogers rejected that, but gave Epic a partial victory by banning Apple’s anti-steering rules.</p><p><blockquote>当像Epic这样的游戏开发商在App Store上出售他们的虚拟货币时，他们有30%的支付费用。当他们在自己的网站上进行同样的交易时，大概在3%以下。这一直都是为了这个。Epic希望拥有自己的应用内支付系统来取代苹果的支付系统，而不会出现将人们送到网站的摩擦。Rogers法官驳回了这一要求，但通过禁止苹果的反转向规则，Epic获得了部分胜利。</blockquote></p><p> The anti-steering rules prevented app developers from having text and links to their own much less expensive in-app payments or subscriptions on their websites. This is a real loss for Apple, and puts the whole structure of the two most lucrative payment methods in the App Store at risk.</p><p><blockquote>反转向规则阻止应用程序开发者在其网站上发布文本和链接到他们自己便宜得多的应用内支付或订阅。这对苹果来说是一个真正的损失，并将App Store中最赚钱的两种支付方式的整个结构置于危险之中。</blockquote></p><p> Let’s say a gaming company pays a 2.5% processing fee on their website. That means they have 27.5 percentage points of marketing to play with. They could give that entire 27.5% to users in the form of a rebate or freebies. It certainly increases friction to have to leave a game you're having fun with, but if there is a big, friendly, dark-patterned button that says “Want free money?” I think a lot of people would tap that button. What’s more, they get to book the same amount in revenue, and stick the cost down in sales and marketing.</p><p><blockquote>假设一家游戏公司在其网站上支付2.5%的处理费。这意味着他们有27.5个百分点的营销空间可以利用。他们可以以折扣或免费赠品的形式给用户全部27.5%。不得不离开一个你正在享受的游戏肯定会增加摩擦，但是如果有一个大的、友好的、深色图案的按钮写着“想要免费的钱吗？”我想很多人会点击那个按钮。更重要的是，他们可以记录相同金额的收入，并在销售和营销方面降低成本。</blockquote></p><p> That’s just one example of how companies may decide to go with this. That’s a lot of margin to play with. The reason Apple had this rule in the first place is that they feared someone would find the magic formula that would provide more revenue by eschewing in-app payments altogether, and everyone else would copy them. They had fought very hard to keep this rule for a reason.</p><p><blockquote>这只是公司可能决定采取这种做法的一个例子。这是一个很大的空间。苹果最初制定这条规则的原因是，他们担心有人会找到一个神奇的公式，通过完全避开应用内支付来提供更多收入，而其他人都会效仿他们。他们努力维护这条规则是有原因的。</blockquote></p><p> Just after the news broke, a friend who knows&nbsp;I own both stocks&nbsp;trolled me with this Bloomberg Terminal screenshot:</p><p><blockquote>消息传出后，一位知道我拥有这两只股票的朋友用这张彭博终端截图向我进行了攻击：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78570d7ae73401a933b2359f3dcd47da\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"281\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Roblox(NYSE:RBLX)is a pure-play mobile gaming company. The vast majority of their revenues come from in-app payments from iOS and Android, the rest from their website sales. Their cost-of-revenues almost all goes to Apple and Google. In the TTM, they had a 74.4% gross margin. If they pay a 2.5% processing fee for website sales, that means 84% of their transaction value was through iOS and Android. If they could get that to 50-50, that would raise all their margins down to EBT by 10 percentage points. If they could get to 73% of sales on the website, they would have a 90% gross margin.</p><p><blockquote>Roblox（纽约证券交易所股票代码：RBLX）是一家纯粹的移动游戏公司。他们的绝大多数收入来自iOS和Android的应用内支付，其余来自网站销售。他们的收入成本几乎全部归苹果和谷歌所有。在TTM，他们的毛利率为74.4%。如果他们为网站销售支付2.5%的处理费，这意味着他们84%的交易价值是通过iOS和Android进行的。如果他们能够将这一比例提高到50-50，那么他们在EBT的所有利润率将提高10个百分点。如果他们能在网站上获得73%的销售额，他们将有90%的毛利率。</blockquote></p><p> There is a lot of money at stake, and a huge incentive for gaming and subscription media companies to figure out how to thread this needle. And that’s all in the absence of further action by the other two branches of government.</p><p><blockquote>这关系到大量的资金，游戏和订阅媒体公司也有巨大的动力去想办法解决这个问题。这一切都是在其他两个政府部门没有采取进一步行动的情况下发生的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Executive Branch</b></p><p><blockquote><b>行政部门</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> This is a good place to discuss the theoretical underpinnings of the new antitrust movement, because two of its leaders now work in the Biden administration. The movement is sometimes referred to as the “neo-Brandeis” movement after Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, because it harkens back to a much earlier era of antitrust enforcement that drastically changed in the 1980s.</p><p><blockquote>这是讨论新反垄断运动理论基础的好地方，因为其两位领导人现在在拜登政府工作。这场运动有时被称为“新布兰代斯”运动，以最高法院大法官路易斯·布兰代斯的名字命名，因为它可以追溯到更早的反垄断执法时代，该时代在20世纪80年代发生了巨大变化。</blockquote></p><p> In 1978, Robert Bork (yes,that Robert Bork) wrote a very influential book called&nbsp;<i>The Antitrust Paradox</i>. His theory urged a refocusing of enforcement away from competition, and towards consumer benefit as the main test. He argued that antitrust enforcement was propping up smaller, less efficient companies to the detriment of the economy.</p><p><blockquote>1978年，罗伯特·博克（没错，就是那个罗伯特·博克）写了一本非常有影响力的书，叫做<i>反垄断悖论</i>他的理论敦促将执法重点从竞争转向消费者利益作为主要测试。他认为，反垄断执法正在支撑规模较小、效率较低的公司，损害了经济。</blockquote></p><p> The 1982 AT&amp;T breakup consent decree became the prototype for the new enforcement. By controlling local and long distance telecommunication, as well as the equipment, AT&amp;T had been underinvesting and overcharging for decades. Their breakup brought an explosion of investment into telecommunications, and brought down prices quickly for landline service and equipment. That became the limit of antitrust enforcement.</p><p><blockquote>1982年美国电话电报公司分手同意法令成为新执法的原型。通过控制本地和长途电信以及设备，美国电话电报公司几十年来一直投资不足，收费过高。他们的分手带来了电信投资的爆炸式增长，并迅速降低了固定电话服务和设备的价格。这成为反垄断执法的极限。</blockquote></p><p> But the focus on consumer benefit has affected competition, and that’s what the neo-Brandeis movement hopes to change. They want antitrust enforcement to return to the way it was a century ago, with more of a focus on how large companies affect competition. Lina Khan, a law professor at Columbia, now runs the FTC, the primary antitrust enforcer in the federal government. Her 2017 law review article, “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” was the spark that lit this fire. Her colleague at Columbia Law, Tim Wu, is also one of the leaders of this movement. He is a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, and his fingerprints are all over&nbsp;the July competition executive order.</p><p><blockquote>但是对消费者利益的关注影响了竞争，这就是新布兰代斯运动希望改变的。他们希望反垄断执法回到一个世纪前的样子，更多地关注大公司如何影响竞争。哥伦比亚大学法学教授莉娜·汗(Lina Khan)现在负责联邦政府主要的反垄断执法机构联邦贸易委员会(FTC)。她2017年的法律评论文章《亚马逊的反垄断悖论》是点燃这场大火的火花。她在哥伦比亚法学院的同事蒂姆·吴也是这场运动的领导者之一。他是白宫经济顾问委员会的成员，7月份的竞争行政命令上到处都是他的指纹。</blockquote></p><p> The order was very wide ranging, with 72 initiatives covering 14 departments and agencies. Most of it does not relate to Apple, but it gives you an idea of the wide breadth of the order. As it relates to Apple:</p><p><blockquote>该命令范围非常广泛，有72项举措，涵盖14个部门和机构。它的大部分与苹果无关，但它让你对秩序的广度有所了解。就苹果而言：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Right-to-repair is a huge threat to the other pillar of Services, AppleCare, which I estimate at 25%-30% of the segment. But more than that, it would change the way Apple makes devices. Apple squeezes out efficiency gains by attaching pooled memory directly to the main processor die, and by soldering storage into the motherboard. Both of these would likely be prohibited to them, and the devices would suffer.</li>  <li>The FTC is two months into a yearlong frisk of the mobile app ecosystem. Based on previous writings, Lina Khan will likely recommend third party app stores, “sideloading” directly from the web, and an end to the in-app payments monopoly.</li> </ul> Executive branch action is always subject to court challenges, and they can take very long to implement. But Congress can change the law in a single session. And they are already into that process.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>维修权对服务的另一个支柱AppleCare来说是一个巨大的威胁，我估计AppleCare占该细分市场的25%-30%。但更重要的是，它将改变苹果制造设备的方式。苹果通过将池内存直接连接到主处理器芯片，以及将存储焊接到主板来挤出效率增益。这两种方法都可能被禁止，这些设备也会受到影响。</li><li>联邦贸易委员会对移动应用生态系统长达一年的搜查已经进行了两个月。根据之前的著作，Lina Khan可能会推荐第三方应用商店，直接从网络“侧装”，并结束应用内支付垄断。</li></ul>行政部门的行动总是受到法院的质疑，而且可能需要很长时间才能实施。但是国会可以在一届会议上改变法律。他们已经进入了这个过程。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Legislative Branch</b></p><p><blockquote><b>立法部门</b></blockquote></p><p> Since there are two houses of Congress, this issue is off on two tracks. The House Judiciary Committee recently passed a suite of bipartisan bills. Of the ones that I think have a good likelihood of passing the full House, here’s how it affects Apple:</p><p><blockquote>由于国会有两院，这个问题在两条轨道上。众议院司法委员会最近通过了一系列两党法案。在我认为很有可能获得全院通过的法案中，以下是它对苹果的影响：</blockquote></p><p> They would be required to allow third party app stores, sideloading, and third party payments in the Apple App Store.</p><p><blockquote>他们将被要求允许苹果应用商店中的第三方应用商店、侧装和第三方支付。</blockquote></p><p> Restricting Apple’s ability to acquire smaller companies. In the past 6 years, Apple has bought around 100 companies, which works out to about one every three weeks on average. It looks like they had been accelerating since fiscal 2018, but then abruptly stopped in fiscal 2021. The reason is the new leader of the FTC.</p><p><blockquote>限制苹果收购小公司的能力。在过去的6年里，苹果收购了大约100家公司，平均每三周就收购一家。看起来他们自2018财年以来一直在加速，但在2021财年突然停止。原因是FTC的新领导人。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2fc9a2578663cc746fdb19ca19dea4c\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The big bulge you see there in 2014 is the Beats acquisition at $3 billion, which remains the exception. Otherwise, Apple buys very small companies for tens or hundreds of millions, usually shuts down any products they may have, and absorbs the talent and IP into Apple proper. Apple’s chip design unit, a cornerstone of their current success, began this way in 2008.</p><p><blockquote>你在2014年看到的最大增长是以30亿美元收购Beats，这仍然是个例外。否则，苹果会花数千万或数亿美元收购非常小的公司，通常会关闭他们可能拥有的任何产品，并将人才和知识产权吸收到苹果本土。苹果的芯片设计部门是他们目前成功的基石，2008年就是这样开始的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>No more private APIs.</b>This would mean everything, like the Apple Pay-enabling NFC chip, would be open to competitors.</p><p><blockquote><b>不再有私有API。</b>这意味着一切，比如支持苹果支付的NFC芯片，都将向竞争对手开放。</blockquote></p><p> <b>No more discriminatory rules.</b>Apple doesn’t force real-world product and service providers like Uber(NYSE:UBER)to use in-app payments. Apple would either have to try and get Uber to pay them 30%, or drop the requirement altogether.</p><p><blockquote><b>不再有歧视性的规则。</b>苹果不会强迫Uber（纽约证券交易所股票代码：UBER）等现实世界的产品和服务提供商使用应用内支付。苹果要么试图让优步向他们支付30%的费用，要么完全放弃这一要求。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The end of the Google search deal.</b>Google currently pays Apple a purported $12 billion a year to make Google the default search engine on iOS. This cash goes directly to EBT.</p><p><blockquote><b>谷歌搜索交易的结束。</b>谷歌目前据称每年向苹果支付120亿美元，以使谷歌成为iOS上的默认搜索引擎。这笔现金直接流向EBT。</blockquote></p><p> <b>They would have to expose more user data to developers.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>他们将不得不向开发者公开更多的用户数据。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Formalizing the anti-steering decision.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>正式确定反转向决策。</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Anti-retaliation provision.</b>If these bills were law, Epic would still be on the App Store while they sued Apple.</p><p><blockquote><b>反报复条款。</b>如果这些法案成为法律，当他们起诉苹果时，Epic仍将在App Store上。</blockquote></p><p> After the House is done wrangling over budget reconciliation, I think these bills will hit the House floor this fall or winter, and I think that they have a high likelihood of passing in something like their current form.</p><p><blockquote>在众议院结束关于预算协调的争论后，我认为这些法案将在今年秋天或冬天提交众议院，我认为它们很有可能以目前的形式获得通过。</blockquote></p><p> But bills also have to clear the Senate, and they move slower. Things are just getting started there. The big movers in the Senate are Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mike Lee of Utah. Klobuchar has&nbsp;written a long book&nbsp;on the subject, and it is not friendly towards Apple. She has also authored a new bill, Open App Markets Act. It is more narrow than the House suite, but not by much. It would still force Apple to allow third party app stores, sideloading, and third party in-app payments. They would also have to get rid of their private APIs. The bill is narrower than the House suite, and less of a threat to Apple, but still would mean the end of App Store as a driver of growth.<i>The Senate bill is the better outcome for Apple, and it is still terrible.</i></p><p><blockquote>但法案也必须通过参议院，而且进展较慢。那里的事情才刚刚开始。参议院的大推动者是明尼苏达州的艾米·克洛布查尔和犹他州的李政颖。Klobuchar就这个问题写了一本长书，它对苹果并不友好。她还起草了一项新法案《开放应用市场法案》。它比房子套房窄，但也窄不了多少。它仍将迫使苹果允许第三方应用商店、侧装和第三方应用内支付。他们还必须摆脱他们的私有API。该法案比众议院套房更窄，对苹果的威胁也更小，但仍意味着App Store作为增长驱动力的终结。<i>参议院的法案对苹果来说是更好的结果，但仍然很糟糕。</i></blockquote></p><p> I believe that we will see something pass before the next Presidential election, or even in this Congressional session. The best Apple shareholders can hope for is that the final bill gets watered down considerably.</p><p><blockquote>我相信，在下届总统选举之前，甚至在本届国会会议上，我们会看到一些事情通过。苹果股东最大的希望就是最终法案被大幅淡化。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Outside The US</b></p><p><blockquote><b>美国境外</b></blockquote></p><p> This is in no way limited to the US. We already discussed the Japanese settlement, and South Korea is forcing Apple and Google to allow third party in-app payments. The case that is farthest along in the EU is Spotify’s, which would force Apple to not charge fees to competing services, so that means music, podcasts, games, video and fitness.</p><p><blockquote>这绝不仅限于美国。我们已经讨论了日本的和解，南韩正在迫使苹果和谷歌允许第三方应用内支付。欧盟进展最快的案例是Spotify，这将迫使苹果不向竞争服务收费，因此这意味着音乐、播客、游戏、视频和健身。</blockquote></p><p> The Chinese Communist Party remains the&nbsp;second biggest tail risk in the world&nbsp;after climate change. Apple’s regulatory risk there is uniquely high, both on the supply and demand sides. Apple has already given into them by not providing their Chinese customers with the same level of privacy as everyone else. With the mood in China right now, who knows where that goes.</p><p><blockquote>中国共产党仍然是仅次于气候变化的世界第二大尾部风险。无论是在供应还是需求方面，苹果的监管风险都非常高。苹果已经屈服于他们，没有向他们的中国客户提供和其他人一样的隐私水平。以中国现在的情绪，谁知道会走向何方。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Losing Control Of App Store Looks Like</b></p><p><blockquote><b>失去对App Store的控制是什么样子</b></blockquote></p><p> Stone Fox Capital here at Seeking Alpha is&nbsp;out with an article&nbsp;pivoting off Katy Huberty's estimation of a 2% earnings loss if the top 20 apps on the App Store were able to eschew in-app payments. Stone Fox would also like you to care about that seemingly small number:</p><p><blockquote>Seeking Alpha的Stone Fox Capital发表了一篇文章，反驳了Katy Huberty的估计，如果App Store上排名前20的应用程序能够避免应用内支付，收益将损失2%。石狐也想让你关心一下这个看似很小的数字：</blockquote></p><p>   Apple won most of their legal case with Epic Games based on the ruling announced on September 10, but the tech giant lost the ultimate battle. The stock remains priced for perfection while the company continues to have growth paths chipped away from the business.  My last article on this subject was called “Chipping Away at App Store.” This is what is happening and the trend is now clear. There is a mood globally to take Apple down a peg, and it is happening too slowly for many people to realize it is happening.</p><p><blockquote>根据9月10日宣布的裁决，苹果赢得了与Epic Games的大部分法律诉讼，但这家科技巨头输掉了最终的战斗。该股的定价仍然是完美的，而该公司的增长道路继续从业务中被削弱。我上一篇关于这个主题的文章叫做“在App Store上削足适履”。这就是正在发生的事情，趋势现在很明显。全球都有一种降低苹果汇率的情绪，但这种情绪发生得太慢，许多人都没有意识到它正在发生。</blockquote></p><p> My own way of modeling the worst case is through my DCF model. It’s modeled as a 25% hit to Services in the first year, with services gross margin reduced from 68% to 65%, followed by a slightly increased growth rate in the segment because of composition effects — the rest of Services grows faster than App Store. I used to model that happening in fiscal 2024, but I have moved that up to fiscal 2023, beginning less than 13 months from now.</p><p><blockquote>我自己对最坏情况建模的方法是通过我的DCF模型。它的模型是第一年服务受到25%的打击，服务毛利率从68%下降到65%，随后由于构成效应，该细分市场的增长率略有上升——其余服务的增长速度快于App Store。我曾经对2024财年发生的情况进行建模，但我已将其提前到2023财年，从现在开始不到13个月。</blockquote></p><p> Here is the effect on fair value on my base case:</p><p><blockquote>以下是我的基本案例对公允价值的影响：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/94b635fe7a2473aafe36bd095a1206b6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"352\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Even with the very slow start for the reason Stone Fox says — the share price has gotten way out ahead of cash flows — my base case still shows an 11% CAGR in fair value through the end of fiscal 2025. The App Store collapse takes that down to an 8% CAGR, 12% lower by 2025.</p><p><blockquote>尽管由于Stone Fox所说的原因，起步非常缓慢——股价已经远远领先于现金流——但我的基本假设仍然显示，到2025财年末，公允价值复合年增长率为11%。App Store的倒闭使复合年增长率降至8%，到2025年将下降12%。</blockquote></p><p> Circling back, Stone Fox puts a button on this more succinctly than I can:</p><p><blockquote>回头，石狐比我更简洁地按下了一个按钮：</blockquote></p><p>   The key investor takeaway is that Apple has a bright future. The company will continue generating profits with operating cash flows topping $100 billion annually, but the tech giant will struggle to generate the growth needed to warrant the current stock price. The 2% hit to earnings might not seem meaningful, but the amount is very harmful to a stock priced for perfection.  <b>How To Take This Seriously</b></p><p><blockquote>投资者的主要收获是苹果拥有光明的未来。该公司将继续创造利润，每年运营现金流超过1000亿美元，但这家科技巨头将难以实现维持当前股价所需的增长。盈利2%的打击似乎没有意义，但这个数额对于定价完美的股票来说是非常有害的。<b>如何认真对待这个</b></blockquote></p><p> In my last article on this subject, someone cheekily replied in the comments, “‘Please take this seriously.’ What does that even mean?” That’s a good question. The first part of the answer is to stop pretending it’s not happening.</p><p><blockquote>在我关于这个主题的上一篇文章中，有人在评论中厚颜无耻地回答说：“‘请认真对待这件事。’这到底是什么意思？”这是个好问题。答案的第一部分是不要假装它没有发生。</blockquote></p><p> “If your time horizon is short, now is a good time to take profits.” I have been using that phrase frequently since Apple hit $140. The last chart just formalizes it with math, but my opinion is that Apple will remain range-bound for some time, between $125 and $155, roughly. I still mean it: if your time horizon is short, now is a good time to take profits.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你的时间范围很短，现在是获利了结的好时机。”自从苹果股价达到140美元以来，我就经常使用这个短语。最后一张图表只是用数学将其形式化，但我的观点是苹果将在一段时间内保持区间波动，大约在125美元到155美元之间。我还是这个意思：如果你的时间范围很短，现在是获利了结的好时机。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But I also believe that no other company is as prepared for the future of technology, regardless of what that brings. That is a&nbsp;far longer discussion. I have been buying Apple shares on the dip since 2005, which is two splits ago. My last buy was in January 2019, when Apple reported that they would miss guidance for the first time in many years. At the time, the commentariat was telling me that Apple’s best days were behind them. I tried to explain that Apple was in a transitional phase, part of a strategy they launched around 2015 to focus more on the growth of the iPhone user base than sales. The strategy would pay off soon, I predicted, and it did in fiscal 2021. That seems like a very long time ago now.</p><p><blockquote>但我也相信，没有其他公司为技术的未来做好了准备，无论它会带来什么。这是一个长得多的讨论。自2005年以来，我一直在逢低买入苹果股票，这是两次拆分前。我最后一次购买是在2019年1月，当时苹果报告称他们将多年来首次错过指导。当时，评论员告诉我，苹果最好的日子已经过去了。我试图解释说，苹果正处于过渡阶段，这是他们在2015年左右推出的战略的一部分，旨在更多地关注iPhone用户群的增长，而不是销售。我预测，这一策略很快就会得到回报，并且在2021财年就得到了回报。那似乎是很久以前的事了。</blockquote></p><p> A consequence of buying the dip from 2005 to 2019 is that I own way too many Apple shares that I could never bring myself to sell. I am massively overweight Apple. There is a “What To Do With The Apple Shares” clause in my will. It is our largest asset, worth more than the house. That has not made me nervous until the last few months, when the tide seemed to start turning on Apple on this issue. I also used to be someone who did not take this threat seriously. I am going to start shaving my position as opportunities present themselves, and one may happen this week with the iPhone launch on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>从2005年到2019年逢低买入的一个后果是，我拥有太多苹果股票，我永远无法出售。我完全是跑赢大盘·苹果。我的遗嘱里有一个“如何处理苹果股票”的条款。这是我们最大的资产，比房子还值钱。这并没有让我感到紧张，直到最近几个月，在这个问题上，潮流似乎开始转向苹果。我也曾经是一个不把这种威胁当回事的人。随着机会的出现，我将开始削减我的职位，其中一个可能会在本周周二iPhone的发布中发生。</blockquote></p><p> <i>To be clear, I will remain overweight Apple, just less so, and I remain bullish in the long term. But I no longer feel the safety I once did with this wildly overweight position.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>需要明确的是，我仍将是跑赢大盘·苹果，只是程度有所降低，而且从长远来看，我仍然看好。但是我不再感觉到曾经在这个疯狂的跑赢大盘位置上的安全感。</i></blockquote></p><p> In contrast, if you are a long term investor who does not have a massively overweight position, watch, wait and fight confirmation bias every day. If you think this begins and ends with Epic, you haven’t been paying attention.</p><p><blockquote>相比之下，如果您是一位没有大量跑赢大盘头寸的长期投资者，请每天观察、等待并对抗确认偏差。如果你认为这是以史诗开始和结束的，那你就没有注意。</blockquote></p><p> Please take this seriously.</p><p><blockquote>请认真对待这件事。</blockquote></p><p> I will be back in a few days with hopefully happier news from the iPhone launch on Tuesday. The big question is whether Apple can begin shipping iPhone before the quarter is out.</p><p><blockquote>几天后我会带着周二iPhone发布会的好消息回来。最大的问题是苹果能否在本季度结束前开始发货iPhone。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4454891-apple-app-store-the-tide-is-turning\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4454891-apple-app-store-the-tide-is-turning","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171919128","content_text":"Summary\n\nA US Federal District Court judge has ruled mostly in Apple’s favor in their case with Epic Games.\nDespite that, and in conjunction with a recent settlement with Japanese regulators, Apple will be getting rid of their anti-steering rule. This is a bigger change than people think.\nThe threat to Apple doesn't end with the Epic trial. There are bigger threats coming from the executive and legislative branches in the US, and regulators in Europe and Asia.\n\nChip Somodevilla/Getty Images News\nIt Does Not End Here\nFor some time now, I have been warning that antitrust law was about to change, and these changes would not be favorable to Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), and that investors need to take these threats seriously. In every one of these attempts, I was rebuffed in the comments by many Apple shareholders telling me that these fears and warnings were overblown. “Long and strong AAPL!” cheerleading seems to be popular.Confirmation bias is a strong thing, and you should fight it every single day.\nMy last attempt was less than two weeks ago, and I was similarly dismissed, and even accused of being a short-selling tout to boot. That last suggestion is pretty funny to anyone who has had to listen to me drone on about Apple stock the last 16 years. The consequence of those 16 years is that I have a lot of Apple stock, so I take things like this very seriously.\nFriday’s decision in Epic v. Apple had one part very bad news for Apple, but mostly a rejection of Epic’s main claim — that iOS is a market unto itself. But the bigger threat continues to be from Congress, where they can change the law in a single session. The House has already passed several bipartisan bills through committee, and three of them seem to have pretty wide support with the rest of the House. A narrower, but just as damaging companion bill is about to start working its way through the Senate. Keep your eyes on Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mike Lee of Utah.\nThen we have regulatory action in the EU, Apple’s second most important region, where antitrust enforcers are siding with Spotify(NYSE:SPOT)in their dispute over in-app payments. Apple has already settled with Japan over their anti-steering rules. South Korea is forcing Apple and Google(NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG)to allow third-party in-app payments. China is a black hole of regulatory mystery.\nThe tide is turning on Apple on this issue. If you think this begins and ends with the Epic case, you haven’t been paying attention.\nRight now the threat is confined to App Store, but this is the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end. This new antitrust movement may come for other parts of Apple, like the other pillar of their fast-growing Services segment, AppleCare, and even dig deeper into the way Apple likes to do business.\nWhat The Ruling Says\nJudge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers hewed very closely to existing law, because that’s what usually happens in District Court, the lowest level of the federal system. She mostly had bad news for Epic, and targeted bad news for Apple.\nThe case rested on how the court defined the “relevant market” in question. Epic wanted it to be iOS, a market unto itself because of the high walls Apple builds around the ecosystem. Judge Rogers rejected that novel claim pretty handily. But she also rejected Apple’s definition: all gaming transactions, including PCs and consoles. She settled on mobile gaming transactions, so essentially the iOS-Android duopoly of mobile gaming transactions.\nHere is the meat of the decision that follows from that:\n\n Given the trial record, the Court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws. While the Court finds that Apple enjoys considerable market share of over 55% and extraordinarily high profit margins, these factors alone do not show antitrust conduct. Success is not illegal…\n\n\n Nonetheless, the trial did show that Apple is engaging in anticompetitive conduct under California’s competition laws. The Court concludes that Apple’s anti-steering provisions hide critical information from consumers and illegally stifle consumer choice. When coupled with Apple’s incipient antitrust violations, these anti-steering provisions are anticompetitive and a nationwide remedy to eliminate those provisions is warranted.\n\nThe most important thing to note here is that the problem for Apple is California law, not federal law. Federal law changing is where the real threat remains, and we are already well into that process.\nJudge Rogers ruled that Apple has to get rid of their anti-steering rules. App developers will now be allowed to inform users of less expensive options on their website, with a link. We’ll talk about the implications in a moment. Apple charges developers 30% for in-app payments, and the first year of in-app subscriptions (15% thereafter). In-app payments and subscriptions are substantially where all of App Store revenue comes from, about 28% of the Services segment and 5.4% of all revenue in calendar 2020.\nAlso, in the category of rounding errors, Epic has to pay Apple the $3.6 million they owe them when they breached their contract. That’s about 0.001% of Apple’s 2021 top line.\nEpic’s Game\nIf you read my first article about the trial from when the pre-trial filings dropped, you may notice that I was a bit confused about what precisely Epic’s game was here. The foundation of their entire argument — that iOS was a market unto itself — was novel, to say the least. At least one of their lawyers must have informed them of the low likelihood of success on their main claims. Moreover, they burned a lot of pages on arguments not central to their case, but seem more geared towards tarnishing Apple’s reputation.\nMy current understanding is that this case was a publicity stunt. What’s more, it worked. The point was to get this issue into the public conversation. Here I am writing about it, and here you are reading about it. But more importantly, the tide is turning in Washington, and I think the issues raised by this trial have accelerated that.\nThe Anti-Steering Rule\nLike many of the App Store rules, the anti-steering rule was part of a multi-year whack-a-mole process where developers tried to find ways to cut out Apple, and Apple closed those holes. Apple fought very hard to keep this rule, but now seems to be capitulating. They settled with Japanese regulators recently on the anti-steering rules as it applied to media subscription apps, and applied the settlement to the rest of the world as well, maybe in anticipation of this ruling. With the Epic ruling, the anti-steering rule is gone.\nWhen a game developer like Epic sells their virtual currency on the App Store, they have a 30% payment fee. When they make the same transaction on their website, it is probably under 3%. This was always what this was about. Epic wanted to have their own in-app payment system to supersede Apple’s, without the friction of sending people to the website. Judge Rogers rejected that, but gave Epic a partial victory by banning Apple’s anti-steering rules.\nThe anti-steering rules prevented app developers from having text and links to their own much less expensive in-app payments or subscriptions on their websites. This is a real loss for Apple, and puts the whole structure of the two most lucrative payment methods in the App Store at risk.\nLet’s say a gaming company pays a 2.5% processing fee on their website. That means they have 27.5 percentage points of marketing to play with. They could give that entire 27.5% to users in the form of a rebate or freebies. It certainly increases friction to have to leave a game you're having fun with, but if there is a big, friendly, dark-patterned button that says “Want free money?” I think a lot of people would tap that button. What’s more, they get to book the same amount in revenue, and stick the cost down in sales and marketing.\nThat’s just one example of how companies may decide to go with this. That’s a lot of margin to play with. The reason Apple had this rule in the first place is that they feared someone would find the magic formula that would provide more revenue by eschewing in-app payments altogether, and everyone else would copy them. They had fought very hard to keep this rule for a reason.\nJust after the news broke, a friend who knows I own both stocks trolled me with this Bloomberg Terminal screenshot:\n\nRoblox(NYSE:RBLX)is a pure-play mobile gaming company. The vast majority of their revenues come from in-app payments from iOS and Android, the rest from their website sales. Their cost-of-revenues almost all goes to Apple and Google. In the TTM, they had a 74.4% gross margin. If they pay a 2.5% processing fee for website sales, that means 84% of their transaction value was through iOS and Android. If they could get that to 50-50, that would raise all their margins down to EBT by 10 percentage points. If they could get to 73% of sales on the website, they would have a 90% gross margin.\nThere is a lot of money at stake, and a huge incentive for gaming and subscription media companies to figure out how to thread this needle. And that’s all in the absence of further action by the other two branches of government.\nThe Executive Branch\nThis is a good place to discuss the theoretical underpinnings of the new antitrust movement, because two of its leaders now work in the Biden administration. The movement is sometimes referred to as the “neo-Brandeis” movement after Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, because it harkens back to a much earlier era of antitrust enforcement that drastically changed in the 1980s.\nIn 1978, Robert Bork (yes,that Robert Bork) wrote a very influential book called The Antitrust Paradox. His theory urged a refocusing of enforcement away from competition, and towards consumer benefit as the main test. He argued that antitrust enforcement was propping up smaller, less efficient companies to the detriment of the economy.\nThe 1982 AT&T breakup consent decree became the prototype for the new enforcement. By controlling local and long distance telecommunication, as well as the equipment, AT&T had been underinvesting and overcharging for decades. Their breakup brought an explosion of investment into telecommunications, and brought down prices quickly for landline service and equipment. That became the limit of antitrust enforcement.\nBut the focus on consumer benefit has affected competition, and that’s what the neo-Brandeis movement hopes to change. They want antitrust enforcement to return to the way it was a century ago, with more of a focus on how large companies affect competition. Lina Khan, a law professor at Columbia, now runs the FTC, the primary antitrust enforcer in the federal government. Her 2017 law review article, “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” was the spark that lit this fire. Her colleague at Columbia Law, Tim Wu, is also one of the leaders of this movement. He is a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, and his fingerprints are all over the July competition executive order.\nThe order was very wide ranging, with 72 initiatives covering 14 departments and agencies. Most of it does not relate to Apple, but it gives you an idea of the wide breadth of the order. As it relates to Apple:\n\nRight-to-repair is a huge threat to the other pillar of Services, AppleCare, which I estimate at 25%-30% of the segment. But more than that, it would change the way Apple makes devices. Apple squeezes out efficiency gains by attaching pooled memory directly to the main processor die, and by soldering storage into the motherboard. Both of these would likely be prohibited to them, and the devices would suffer.\nThe FTC is two months into a yearlong frisk of the mobile app ecosystem. Based on previous writings, Lina Khan will likely recommend third party app stores, “sideloading” directly from the web, and an end to the in-app payments monopoly.\n\nExecutive branch action is always subject to court challenges, and they can take very long to implement. But Congress can change the law in a single session. And they are already into that process.\nThe Legislative Branch\nSince there are two houses of Congress, this issue is off on two tracks. The House Judiciary Committee recently passed a suite of bipartisan bills. Of the ones that I think have a good likelihood of passing the full House, here’s how it affects Apple:\nThey would be required to allow third party app stores, sideloading, and third party payments in the Apple App Store.\nRestricting Apple’s ability to acquire smaller companies. In the past 6 years, Apple has bought around 100 companies, which works out to about one every three weeks on average. It looks like they had been accelerating since fiscal 2018, but then abruptly stopped in fiscal 2021. The reason is the new leader of the FTC.\nData by YCharts\nThe big bulge you see there in 2014 is the Beats acquisition at $3 billion, which remains the exception. Otherwise, Apple buys very small companies for tens or hundreds of millions, usually shuts down any products they may have, and absorbs the talent and IP into Apple proper. Apple’s chip design unit, a cornerstone of their current success, began this way in 2008.\nNo more private APIs.This would mean everything, like the Apple Pay-enabling NFC chip, would be open to competitors.\nNo more discriminatory rules.Apple doesn’t force real-world product and service providers like Uber(NYSE:UBER)to use in-app payments. Apple would either have to try and get Uber to pay them 30%, or drop the requirement altogether.\nThe end of the Google search deal.Google currently pays Apple a purported $12 billion a year to make Google the default search engine on iOS. This cash goes directly to EBT.\nThey would have to expose more user data to developers.\nFormalizing the anti-steering decision.\nAnti-retaliation provision.If these bills were law, Epic would still be on the App Store while they sued Apple.\nAfter the House is done wrangling over budget reconciliation, I think these bills will hit the House floor this fall or winter, and I think that they have a high likelihood of passing in something like their current form.\nBut bills also have to clear the Senate, and they move slower. Things are just getting started there. The big movers in the Senate are Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mike Lee of Utah. Klobuchar has written a long book on the subject, and it is not friendly towards Apple. She has also authored a new bill, Open App Markets Act. It is more narrow than the House suite, but not by much. It would still force Apple to allow third party app stores, sideloading, and third party in-app payments. They would also have to get rid of their private APIs. The bill is narrower than the House suite, and less of a threat to Apple, but still would mean the end of App Store as a driver of growth.The Senate bill is the better outcome for Apple, and it is still terrible.\nI believe that we will see something pass before the next Presidential election, or even in this Congressional session. The best Apple shareholders can hope for is that the final bill gets watered down considerably.\nOutside The US\nThis is in no way limited to the US. We already discussed the Japanese settlement, and South Korea is forcing Apple and Google to allow third party in-app payments. The case that is farthest along in the EU is Spotify’s, which would force Apple to not charge fees to competing services, so that means music, podcasts, games, video and fitness.\nThe Chinese Communist Party remains the second biggest tail risk in the world after climate change. Apple’s regulatory risk there is uniquely high, both on the supply and demand sides. Apple has already given into them by not providing their Chinese customers with the same level of privacy as everyone else. With the mood in China right now, who knows where that goes.\nWhat Losing Control Of App Store Looks Like\nStone Fox Capital here at Seeking Alpha is out with an article pivoting off Katy Huberty's estimation of a 2% earnings loss if the top 20 apps on the App Store were able to eschew in-app payments. Stone Fox would also like you to care about that seemingly small number:\n\n Apple won most of their legal case with Epic Games based on the ruling announced on September 10, but the tech giant lost the ultimate battle. The stock remains priced for perfection while the company continues to have growth paths chipped away from the business.\n\nMy last article on this subject was called “Chipping Away at App Store.” This is what is happening and the trend is now clear. There is a mood globally to take Apple down a peg, and it is happening too slowly for many people to realize it is happening.\nMy own way of modeling the worst case is through my DCF model. It’s modeled as a 25% hit to Services in the first year, with services gross margin reduced from 68% to 65%, followed by a slightly increased growth rate in the segment because of composition effects — the rest of Services grows faster than App Store. I used to model that happening in fiscal 2024, but I have moved that up to fiscal 2023, beginning less than 13 months from now.\nHere is the effect on fair value on my base case:\n\nEven with the very slow start for the reason Stone Fox says — the share price has gotten way out ahead of cash flows — my base case still shows an 11% CAGR in fair value through the end of fiscal 2025. The App Store collapse takes that down to an 8% CAGR, 12% lower by 2025.\nCircling back, Stone Fox puts a button on this more succinctly than I can:\n\n The key investor takeaway is that Apple has a bright future. The company will continue generating profits with operating cash flows topping $100 billion annually, but the tech giant will struggle to generate the growth needed to warrant the current stock price. The 2% hit to earnings might not seem meaningful, but the amount is very harmful to a stock priced for perfection.\n\nHow To Take This Seriously\nIn my last article on this subject, someone cheekily replied in the comments, “‘Please take this seriously.’ What does that even mean?” That’s a good question. The first part of the answer is to stop pretending it’s not happening.\n“If your time horizon is short, now is a good time to take profits.” I have been using that phrase frequently since Apple hit $140. The last chart just formalizes it with math, but my opinion is that Apple will remain range-bound for some time, between $125 and $155, roughly. I still mean it: if your time horizon is short, now is a good time to take profits.\nBut I also believe that no other company is as prepared for the future of technology, regardless of what that brings. That is a far longer discussion. I have been buying Apple shares on the dip since 2005, which is two splits ago. My last buy was in January 2019, when Apple reported that they would miss guidance for the first time in many years. At the time, the commentariat was telling me that Apple’s best days were behind them. I tried to explain that Apple was in a transitional phase, part of a strategy they launched around 2015 to focus more on the growth of the iPhone user base than sales. The strategy would pay off soon, I predicted, and it did in fiscal 2021. That seems like a very long time ago now.\nA consequence of buying the dip from 2005 to 2019 is that I own way too many Apple shares that I could never bring myself to sell. I am massively overweight Apple. There is a “What To Do With The Apple Shares” clause in my will. It is our largest asset, worth more than the house. That has not made me nervous until the last few months, when the tide seemed to start turning on Apple on this issue. I also used to be someone who did not take this threat seriously. I am going to start shaving my position as opportunities present themselves, and one may happen this week with the iPhone launch on Tuesday.\nTo be clear, I will remain overweight Apple, just less so, and I remain bullish in the long term. But I no longer feel the safety I once did with this wildly overweight position.\nIn contrast, if you are a long term investor who does not have a massively overweight position, watch, wait and fight confirmation bias every day. If you think this begins and ends with Epic, you haven’t been paying attention.\nPlease take this seriously.\nI will be back in a few days with hopefully happier news from the iPhone launch on Tuesday. The big question is whether Apple can begin shipping iPhone before the quarter is out.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":560,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":172855416,"gmtCreate":1626954363535,"gmtModify":1633769438726,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/172855416","repostId":"2153477496","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":557,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":600930581,"gmtCreate":1638029495118,"gmtModify":1638029495244,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/600930581","repostId":"1138332509","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":403,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":875710330,"gmtCreate":1637685258296,"gmtModify":1637685258404,"author":{"id":"3558609398993628","authorId":"3558609398993628","name":"Kazmir","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbf34248b52f1c38a9dc30ae20b49d8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3558609398993628","authorIdStr":"3558609398993628"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/875710330","repostId":"1117658681","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117658681","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1637681053,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1117658681?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-23 23:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"XPeng shares rose nearly 12% in early trading<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价早盘涨近12%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117658681","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"XPeng shares rose nearly 12% in early trading after the China-based electric vehicle maker reported ","content":"<p>XPeng&nbsp;shares&nbsp;rose&nbsp;nearly&nbsp;12%&nbsp;in&nbsp;early&nbsp;trading&nbsp;after the China-based electric vehicle maker reported a wider-than-expected third-quarter loss but revenue that rose well above forecasts and provided an upbeat fourth-quarter outlook.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8d43127b29dfc54fadaa9e23939d911\" tg-width=\"878\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The net loss widened to RMB1.59 bln ($249.7 million), or RMB1.89 per American depositary share (ADS), from a loss of RMB1.15 billion a year ago. Excluding nonrecurring items, the adjusted loss per ADS came to RMB1.77, compared with the FactSet consensus of RMB1.30.</p><p><blockquote>小鹏汽车股价早盘上涨近12%，此前这家中国电动汽车制造商公布第三季度亏损超出预期，但营收远高于预期，并提供了乐观的第四季度前景。净亏损从一年前的亏损11.5亿元人民币扩大至15.9亿元人民币（2.497亿美元），即每股美国存托股票(ADS)1.89元人民币。不包括非经常性项目，调整后每股美国存托凭证亏损为人民币1.77元，而FactSet共识为人民币1.30元。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue jumps 187.4% to RMB5.72 billion ($895.5 million) to beat the FactSet consensus of RMB5.03 billion, as deliveries rose 199.2% to a record 25,666 vehicles, including 217.7% growth in P7 model deliveries.</p><p><blockquote>收入增长187.4%，达到人民币57.2亿元（8.955亿美元），超过FactSet预期的人民币50.3亿元，交付量增长199.2%，达到创纪录的25,666辆，其中P7车型交付量增长217.7%。</blockquote></p><p> Gross margin improved to 14.4% from 4.6%. Looking ahead, the company expects fourth-quarter deliveries of between 34,500 and 36,500 vehicles, representing growth of 166.1% to 181.5%, and revenue between RMB7.1 billion and RMB7.5 billion, compared with the FactSet consensus of RMB6.09 billion.</p><p><blockquote>毛利率从4.6%提高至14.4%。展望未来，该公司预计第四季度交付量将在34,500辆至36,500辆之间，增长166.1%至181.5%，收入将在人民币71亿元至人民币75亿元之间，而FactSet共识为人民币60.9亿元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>XPeng shares rose nearly 12% in early trading<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价早盘涨近12%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXPeng shares rose nearly 12% in early trading<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价早盘涨近12%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-11-23 23:24</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>XPeng&nbsp;shares&nbsp;rose&nbsp;nearly&nbsp;12%&nbsp;in&nbsp;early&nbsp;trading&nbsp;after the China-based electric vehicle maker reported a wider-than-expected third-quarter loss but revenue that rose well above forecasts and provided an upbeat fourth-quarter outlook.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8d43127b29dfc54fadaa9e23939d911\" tg-width=\"878\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The net loss widened to RMB1.59 bln ($249.7 million), or RMB1.89 per American depositary share (ADS), from a loss of RMB1.15 billion a year ago. Excluding nonrecurring items, the adjusted loss per ADS came to RMB1.77, compared with the FactSet consensus of RMB1.30.</p><p><blockquote>小鹏汽车股价早盘上涨近12%，此前这家中国电动汽车制造商公布第三季度亏损超出预期，但营收远高于预期，并提供了乐观的第四季度前景。净亏损从一年前的亏损11.5亿元人民币扩大至15.9亿元人民币（2.497亿美元），即每股美国存托股票(ADS)1.89元人民币。不包括非经常性项目，调整后每股美国存托凭证亏损为人民币1.77元，而FactSet共识为人民币1.30元。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue jumps 187.4% to RMB5.72 billion ($895.5 million) to beat the FactSet consensus of RMB5.03 billion, as deliveries rose 199.2% to a record 25,666 vehicles, including 217.7% growth in P7 model deliveries.</p><p><blockquote>收入增长187.4%，达到人民币57.2亿元（8.955亿美元），超过FactSet预期的人民币50.3亿元，交付量增长199.2%，达到创纪录的25,666辆，其中P7车型交付量增长217.7%。</blockquote></p><p> Gross margin improved to 14.4% from 4.6%. Looking ahead, the company expects fourth-quarter deliveries of between 34,500 and 36,500 vehicles, representing growth of 166.1% to 181.5%, and revenue between RMB7.1 billion and RMB7.5 billion, compared with the FactSet consensus of RMB6.09 billion.</p><p><blockquote>毛利率从4.6%提高至14.4%。展望未来，该公司预计第四季度交付量将在34,500辆至36,500辆之间，增长166.1%至181.5%，收入将在人民币71亿元至人民币75亿元之间，而FactSet共识为人民币60.9亿元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏汽车","09868":"小鹏汽车-W"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117658681","content_text":"XPeng shares rose nearly 12% in early trading after the China-based electric vehicle maker reported a wider-than-expected third-quarter loss but revenue that rose well above forecasts and provided an upbeat fourth-quarter outlook.The net loss widened to RMB1.59 bln ($249.7 million), or RMB1.89 per American depositary share (ADS), from a loss of RMB1.15 billion a year ago. Excluding nonrecurring items, the adjusted loss per ADS came to RMB1.77, compared with the FactSet consensus of RMB1.30.\nRevenue jumps 187.4% to RMB5.72 billion ($895.5 million) to beat the FactSet consensus of RMB5.03 billion, as deliveries rose 199.2% to a record 25,666 vehicles, including 217.7% growth in P7 model deliveries.\nGross margin improved to 14.4% from 4.6%. Looking ahead, the company expects fourth-quarter deliveries of between 34,500 and 36,500 vehicles, representing growth of 166.1% to 181.5%, and revenue between RMB7.1 billion and RMB7.5 billion, compared with the FactSet consensus of RMB6.09 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XPEV":0.9,"09868":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":945,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}