CSK88的个人主页 - 老虎社区

CSK88

CSK88

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

13关注

4粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2022-01-01

Cool

EV Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>

2022-01-01

I like it

4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五4个最大的价格目标变化</blockquote>

2022-01-01

Thanks for sharing

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-31

Good

Stocks Rise as Dow and S&P 500 Aim to Build on Records<blockquote>道琼斯指数和标普500的目标是再创历史新高，股市上涨</blockquote>

2021-12-31

Think so

Lucid Vs. NIO Stock: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?<blockquote>Lucid与蔚来股票：哪只电动汽车股票更值得购买？</blockquote>

2021-12-31

Cool, soon the traditional car will be replace by ev

EV Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>

2021-12-31

Wow

Some Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote>

2021-12-31

Shoppe

Sea Limited Shares Jumped More Than 4% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨逾4%</blockquote>

2021-12-31

Coming coming ....

Evgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote>

2021-12-31

Coming coming

Evgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote>

2021-12-29

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>

2021-12-29

Thanks for sharing ...[LOL]

Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>

2021-12-22

Good to hear

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-17

Good news

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-17

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-16

Actually this type of business company, i buy for future

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-14

Yes

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-13

Good

Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share<blockquote>辉瑞以100美元/股收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，早盘股价上涨逾80%</blockquote>

2021-12-13

Good sharing

3 Supercharged Electric-Vehicle Stocks to Buy in 2022 and Beyond<blockquote>2022年及以后值得买入的3只增压电动汽车股票</blockquote>

2021-12-06

Tq

Apple Stock Is an Attractive Buy, Says KeyBanc. Price Target Set at $191.<blockquote>KeyBanc表示，苹果股票是一个有吸引力的买入。目标价定为191美元。</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3569730362364110","uuid":"3569730362364110","gmtCreate":1607962957105,"gmtModify":1625194669086,"name":"CSK88","pinyin":"csk88","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":13,"tweetSize":27,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-2","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"资深虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1000天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.09.11","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.15","exceedPercentage":"60.02%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":692235506,"gmtCreate":1640974517792,"gmtModify":1640974517916,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692235506","repostId":"1139922858","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139922858","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640963323,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1139922858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-31 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139922858","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/52a8a5b51cea78b126f429bba375c881\" tg-width=\"360\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>电动汽车股早盘上涨。Lucid、蔚来、Rivian、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、菲斯克、尼古拉、Canoo和图森未来股价上涨1%至3%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-31 23:08</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/52a8a5b51cea78b126f429bba375c881\" tg-width=\"360\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>电动汽车股早盘上涨。Lucid、蔚来、Rivian、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、菲斯克、尼古拉、Canoo和图森未来股价上涨1%至3%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139922858","content_text":"EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LI":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2433,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692235271,"gmtCreate":1640974501745,"gmtModify":1640974501869,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I like it","listText":"I like it","text":"I like it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692235271","repostId":"1150283067","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150283067","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1640962811,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1150283067?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-31 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五4个最大的价格目标变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150283067","media":"Benzinga","summary":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. X","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从6美元上调至8美元，涨幅为24.21%。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%至2.89美元。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>Rosenblatt将Synaptics Incorporated SYNA+0.75%目标价从290美元上调至345美元。Synaptics股价周四下跌1.6%，收于287.70美元。</blockquote></p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>HC Wainwright&amp;Co.将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从4.25美元上调至5.4美元。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%，至2.89美元。</blockquote></p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>巴克莱将星座品牌公司STZ+0.19%目标价从268美元上调至271美元。Constellation股价在盘前交易中下跌0.2%，至249.00美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五4个最大的价格目标变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五4个最大的价格目标变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-31 23:00</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从6美元上调至8美元，涨幅为24.21%。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%至2.89美元。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>Rosenblatt将Synaptics Incorporated SYNA+0.75%目标价从290美元上调至345美元。Synaptics股价周四下跌1.6%，收于287.70美元。</blockquote></p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>HC Wainwright&amp;Co.将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从4.25美元上调至5.4美元。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%，至2.89美元。</blockquote></p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>巴克莱将星座品牌公司STZ+0.19%目标价从268美元上调至271美元。Constellation股价在盘前交易中下跌0.2%，至249.00美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STZ":"星座品牌","XERS":"Xeris制药","SYNA":"Synaptics Incorporated"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150283067","content_text":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.HC Wainwright & Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STZ":0.9,"XERS":0.9,"SYNA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2144,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692235890,"gmtCreate":1640974484116,"gmtModify":1640974484209,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks for sharing&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks for sharing&nbsp;","text":"Thanks for sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692235890","repostId":"2195412163","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2843,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141453,"gmtCreate":1640884710388,"gmtModify":1640884710476,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141453","repostId":"1121842221","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121842221","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640874762,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121842221?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks Rise as Dow and S&P 500 Aim to Build on Records<blockquote>道琼斯指数和标普500的目标是再创历史新高，股市上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121842221","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record high","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record highs in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>美国股市周四上涨，此前标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数在前一交易日创下历史新高。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained about 150 points. The S&amp;P 500 rose 0.2%. The Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约150点。标普500上涨0.2%。纳斯达克综合指数上涨0.2%。</blockquote></p><p>Thursday is the second-last trading session of 2021. The end of the year is a historically strong period for stocks, which has been dubbed the “Santa Claus rally.”</p><p><blockquote>周四是2021年倒数第二个交易日。年底是股市历史上的强势时期，被称为“圣诞老人反弹”。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has risen during the period — the last five trading days of the year followed by the first two session in January — 78.5% of the time since 1928, according to Bank of America.</p><p><blockquote>根据美银的数据，自1928年以来，标普500在此期间（一年的最后五个交易日以及1月份的前两个交易日）上涨的时间为78.5%。</blockquote></p><p>“Santa has been good to investors this holiday season, and we look for another year of positive returns in 2022,” said Scott Wren, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.</p><p><blockquote>富国银行投资研究所高级全球市场策略师Scott Wren表示：“圣诞老人在这个假期对投资者来说很好，我们期待2022年又是一年的正回报。”</blockquote></p><p>Biogen slid 6.5% in the premarket Thursday after Samsung denied a report in The Korea Economic Daily that it was in talks to buy Biogen. Biogen shares had surged 9.5% on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>在三星否认《韩国经济日报》有关其正在洽谈收购百健(Biogen)的报道后，百健(Biogen)周四盘前下跌6.5%。Biogen股价周三飙升9.5%。</blockquote></p><p>Jobless claims last week came in lower than expected, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Initial claims totaled 198,000 for the week ended Dec. 25, while economists surveyed by Dow Jones projected 205,000.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周四报告称，上周申请失业救济人数低于预期。截至12月25日当周，初请失业金人数总计198,000人，而道琼斯调查的经济学家预计为205,000人。</blockquote></p><p>On Wednesday the S&amp;P 500 posted its 70th record close of the year. This year has seen the second-highest number of record closes for the benchmark index during a calendar year, trailing just 1995′s 77 record closing highs. The Dow also closed at its first high since November and saw its sixth-straight positive session.</p><p><blockquote>周三，标普500公布了今年第70个收盘纪录。今年该基准指数创下历年收盘纪录数量第二高，仅次于1995年创下的77个收盘纪录高点。道琼斯指数也收于11月以来的首个高点，并连续第六个交易日上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major averages are in the green for December. The S&amp;P and Dow are on pace for a second positive month in the last three, while the Nasdaq Composite is on track for a third straight month of gains.</p><p><blockquote>12月份三大股指均呈绿色。标准普尔指数和道琼斯指数有望在过去三个月中连续第二个月上涨，而纳斯达克综合指数有望连续第三个月上涨。</blockquote></p><p>For the year, the S&amp;P is up more than 27% and the Dow is up more than 19%. The Nasdaq has gained roughly 22.3%, while the Russell 2000 is up nearly 14%.</p><p><blockquote>今年，标准普尔指数上涨了27%以上，道琼斯指数上涨了19%以上。纳斯达克上涨约22.3%，而罗素2000指数上涨近14%。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks Rise as Dow and S&P 500 Aim to Build on Records<blockquote>道琼斯指数和标普500的目标是再创历史新高，股市上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks Rise as Dow and S&P 500 Aim to Build on Records<blockquote>道琼斯指数和标普500的目标是再创历史新高，股市上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 22:32</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record highs in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>美国股市周四上涨，此前标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数在前一交易日创下历史新高。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained about 150 points. The S&amp;P 500 rose 0.2%. The Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约150点。标普500上涨0.2%。纳斯达克综合指数上涨0.2%。</blockquote></p><p>Thursday is the second-last trading session of 2021. The end of the year is a historically strong period for stocks, which has been dubbed the “Santa Claus rally.”</p><p><blockquote>周四是2021年倒数第二个交易日。年底是股市历史上的强势时期，被称为“圣诞老人反弹”。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has risen during the period — the last five trading days of the year followed by the first two session in January — 78.5% of the time since 1928, according to Bank of America.</p><p><blockquote>根据美银的数据，自1928年以来，标普500在此期间（一年的最后五个交易日以及1月份的前两个交易日）上涨的时间为78.5%。</blockquote></p><p>“Santa has been good to investors this holiday season, and we look for another year of positive returns in 2022,” said Scott Wren, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.</p><p><blockquote>富国银行投资研究所高级全球市场策略师Scott Wren表示：“圣诞老人在这个假期对投资者来说很好，我们期待2022年又是一年的正回报。”</blockquote></p><p>Biogen slid 6.5% in the premarket Thursday after Samsung denied a report in The Korea Economic Daily that it was in talks to buy Biogen. Biogen shares had surged 9.5% on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>在三星否认《韩国经济日报》有关其正在洽谈收购百健(Biogen)的报道后，百健(Biogen)周四盘前下跌6.5%。Biogen股价周三飙升9.5%。</blockquote></p><p>Jobless claims last week came in lower than expected, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Initial claims totaled 198,000 for the week ended Dec. 25, while economists surveyed by Dow Jones projected 205,000.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周四报告称，上周申请失业救济人数低于预期。截至12月25日当周，初请失业金人数总计198,000人，而道琼斯调查的经济学家预计为205,000人。</blockquote></p><p>On Wednesday the S&amp;P 500 posted its 70th record close of the year. This year has seen the second-highest number of record closes for the benchmark index during a calendar year, trailing just 1995′s 77 record closing highs. The Dow also closed at its first high since November and saw its sixth-straight positive session.</p><p><blockquote>周三，标普500公布了今年第70个收盘纪录。今年该基准指数创下历年收盘纪录数量第二高，仅次于1995年创下的77个收盘纪录高点。道琼斯指数也收于11月以来的首个高点，并连续第六个交易日上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major averages are in the green for December. The S&amp;P and Dow are on pace for a second positive month in the last three, while the Nasdaq Composite is on track for a third straight month of gains.</p><p><blockquote>12月份三大股指均呈绿色。标准普尔指数和道琼斯指数有望在过去三个月中连续第二个月上涨，而纳斯达克综合指数有望连续第三个月上涨。</blockquote></p><p>For the year, the S&amp;P is up more than 27% and the Dow is up more than 19%. The Nasdaq has gained roughly 22.3%, while the Russell 2000 is up nearly 14%.</p><p><blockquote>今年，标准普尔指数上涨了27%以上，道琼斯指数上涨了19%以上。纳斯达克上涨约22.3%，而罗素2000指数上涨近14%。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121842221","content_text":"U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record highs in the previous session.The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained about 150 points. The S&P 500 rose 0.2%. The Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.2%.Thursday is the second-last trading session of 2021. The end of the year is a historically strong period for stocks, which has been dubbed the “Santa Claus rally.”The S&P 500 has risen during the period — the last five trading days of the year followed by the first two session in January — 78.5% of the time since 1928, according to Bank of America.“Santa has been good to investors this holiday season, and we look for another year of positive returns in 2022,” said Scott Wren, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.Biogen slid 6.5% in the premarket Thursday after Samsung denied a report in The Korea Economic Daily that it was in talks to buy Biogen. Biogen shares had surged 9.5% on Wednesday.Jobless claims last week came in lower than expected, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Initial claims totaled 198,000 for the week ended Dec. 25, while economists surveyed by Dow Jones projected 205,000.On Wednesday the S&P 500 posted its 70th record close of the year. This year has seen the second-highest number of record closes for the benchmark index during a calendar year, trailing just 1995′s 77 record closing highs. The Dow also closed at its first high since November and saw its sixth-straight positive session.All three major averages are in the green for December. The S&P and Dow are on pace for a second positive month in the last three, while the Nasdaq Composite is on track for a third straight month of gains.For the year, the S&P is up more than 27% and the Dow is up more than 19%. The Nasdaq has gained roughly 22.3%, while the Russell 2000 is up nearly 14%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2681,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141236,"gmtCreate":1640884679254,"gmtModify":1640884679344,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Think so","listText":"Think so","text":"Think so","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141236","repostId":"1139674064","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139674064","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640878484,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1139674064?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 23:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lucid Vs. NIO Stock: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?<blockquote>Lucid与蔚来股票：哪只电动汽车股票更值得购买？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139674064","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThe EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and gre","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body><b>总结</b></body></html></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>The EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.</li><li>Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and great tech, which allow them to demand high ASPs.</li><li>NIO seems like the lower-risk choice among these two, and due to being a lot farther along from a production ramp perspective, it is, I believe, the better choice today.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe01e445aec1bb67f1b8d810f551603\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1025\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>电动汽车市场的竞争越来越激烈。拥有强大的品牌或技术对于公司脱颖而出非常重要。</li><li>蔚来和LCID都拥有强大的品牌和出色的技术，这使得它们能够要求很高的平均售价。</li><li>蔚来似乎是这两者中风险较低的选择，而且由于从产量增长的角度来看，它走得更远，我相信它是当今更好的选择。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock社论来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p>The EV space has brought up many companies that do not seem too viable in the long run, but there are also strong contenders apart from Tesla (TSLA). In this report, we&#39;ll pit Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO) against each other - two of the most interesting EV players that combine strong brands and high-end technological capabilities. In this report, we&#39;ll take a deeper dive into the tech and product side and will look at individual risks for both companies. Overall, I do believe that NIO is the more attractive choice among these two at current prices.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域催生了许多从长远来看似乎不太可行的公司，但除了特斯拉（TSLA）之外，也有强有力的竞争者。在本报告中，我们将对Lucid Group，Inc.(LCID)和蔚来（蔚来）进行对比，这两家最有趣的电动汽车公司结合了强大的品牌和高端技术能力。在本报告中，我们将更深入地探讨技术和产品方面，并探讨两家公司的个别风险。总体而言，我确实相信以目前的价格来看，蔚来是这两个选择中更具吸引力的。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid And NIO In The EV Market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>电动汽车市场的Lucid和蔚来</b></blockquote></p><p>The global EV market has been growing rapidly, with EV sales likely coming in a little north of six million, which is roughly twice as high as during the previous year. Clearly, EVs are a huge growth sector in the global automobile market, although it should be noted that most vehicles sold around the world are still powered by internal combustion engines. Over the years, EV market share should continue to climb rapidly, but it is not looking like EVs will dominate ICE vehicles any time soon.</p><p><blockquote>全球电动汽车市场一直在快速增长，电动汽车销量可能略高于600万辆，大约是上一年的两倍。显然，电动汽车是全球汽车市场的一个巨大增长领域，尽管应该指出的是，全球销售的大多数车辆仍然由内燃机驱动。多年来，电动汽车市场份额应该会继续快速攀升，但电动汽车似乎不会很快主导内燃机汽车。</blockquote></p><p>The market leaders in the EV space are Tesla and BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY), and, depending on how one counts plug-in hybrids, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY). NIO Inc. and Lucid Group, Inc. are not among the largest companies for now. NIO is selling around 11,000 vehicles a month right now, which translates into a ~130,000 annual sales pace. Sales have been growing quickly, however, which is why NIO will most likely sell more than 130,000 vehicles next year, as deliveries should continue to climb sequentially. Lucid is way smaller for now, in terms of deliveries, as the company has likely sold a couple of hundred vehicles this year. Next year, Lucid Group targets deliveries of around 20,000 vehicles - up by a lot versus 2021, but still a relatively small number compared to the deliveries NIO and many other peers will hit next year.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域的市场领导者是特斯拉和比亚迪（OTCPK：BYDDY），以及大众汽车（OTCPK：VWAGY），具体取决于插电式混合动力车的计算方式。蔚来和Lucid Group，Inc.目前还不是最大的公司。蔚来目前每月销售约11,000辆汽车，相当于年销量约130,000辆。然而，销量一直在快速增长，这就是为什么蔚来明年的销量很可能会超过13万辆，因为交付量应该会继续连续攀升。就交付量而言，Lucid目前的规模要小得多，因为该公司今年可能已售出数百辆汽车。明年，Lucid Group的目标是交付约20,000辆汽车，比2021年增长很多，但与蔚来和许多其他同行明年的交付量相比，这个数字仍然相对较小。</blockquote></p><p><b>LCID Vs. NIO&#39;s Past Quarterly Performance</b></p><p><blockquote><b>LCID与蔚来过去的季度表现</b></blockquote></p><p>As noted above, NIO&#39;s sales performance was way stronger than that of Lucid over the last three months, but that was hardly a surprise as LCID just began delivering vehicles to customers. On a share price basis, however, Lucid fared better:</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，蔚来过去三个月的销售业绩远强于Lucid，但这并不奇怪，因为LCID刚刚开始向客户交付车辆。然而，从股价来看，Lucid的表现更好：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7a6e7cb1b1485f32cc25ade9f387a5b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Over the last three months, LCID is up close to 50%, whereas NIO saw its shares drop by close to 20% over the same time frame. In NIO&#39;s case, macro worries about Chinese regulation played a role, whereas LCID benefitted a lot from growing enthusiasm for US-based EV players caused by Rivian&#39;s (RIVN) huge IPO success. On top of that, the start of deliveries also attracted new investors to Lucid&#39;s stock. If analysts are correct, NIO is the much better value today:</p><p><blockquote>过去三个月，LCID上涨了近50%，而蔚来的股价同期下跌了近20%。就蔚来而言，对中国监管的宏观担忧发挥了作用，而LCID则从Rivian(RIVN)IPO的巨大成功引发的对美国电动汽车企业日益增长的热情中受益匪浅。最重要的是，交付的开始也吸引了新投资者购买Lucid的股票。如果分析师是正确的，那么蔚来今天的价值要高得多：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b1d0939d657b284e25d8447ccb211b5\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shares are trading at less than half the consensus price target, which implies 100%+ upside over the next year, whereas LCID is trading almost perfectly in line with the current consensus price target - which implies no upside over the next year. NIO&#39;s underperformance over the last quarter thus seems to position the company well for a strong performance from the current level, whereas the same can&#39;t be said about Lucid.</p><p><blockquote>该股的交易价格不到共识价格目标的一半，这意味着明年有100%以上的上涨空间，而LCID的交易价格几乎完全符合当前的共识价格目标，这意味着明年没有上涨空间。因此，蔚来上个季度的表现不佳似乎使该公司在当前水平上表现强劲，而Lucid则不然。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid Vs. NIO Key Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid与蔚来关键指标</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>Let&#39;s take a deeper look at the tech of the two companies, as well as at their branding, and their specific key risks. Both NIO and Lucid are active in the high-end segment of the EV industry, selling vehicles with ASPs well north of the average Tesla. NIO&#39;s ASP is around $70,000, and Lucid&#39;s ASP is even higher than that for now, as the company is selling the most expensive Air<i>Dream</i>version first. Tesla, the current EV leader, has an ASP of around $50,000. Both NIO and Tesla are thus operating in a more luxurious, higher-end segment of the market compared to Tesla. How are these companies able to demand way higher ASPs than Tesla? There are several factors at play, including branding, but one of the most important factors is their great tech.</p><p><blockquote>让我们更深入地了解这两家公司的技术、品牌及其具体的主要风险。蔚来和Lucid都活跃在电动汽车行业的高端领域，销售的汽车平均售价远高于特斯拉的平均水平。蔚来的平均售价约为7万美元，Lucid的平均售价目前甚至更高，因为该公司销售的是最昂贵的Air<i>梦想</i>版本优先。特斯拉是目前电动汽车的领导者，其平均售价约为50,000美元。因此，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和特斯拉都在更豪华、更高端的细分市场运营。这些公司怎么能要求比特斯拉高得多的平均售价呢？有几个因素在起作用，包括品牌，但最重要的因素之一是他们出色的技术。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s battery-swapping technology, for example, allows its customers to fully &#34;recharge&#34; in a couple of minutes, while most other EVs take way longer to fully charge. Lucid doesn&#39;t employ battery-swapping, but its racing-tested 900V technology allows for both a huge range as well as for fast charging speeds - Lucid&#39;s architecture allows customers to charge up to 300 miles worth of energy in just 20 minutes. The Tesla S, for reference, uses a ~400V architecture that allows customers to recharge 200 miles in 15 minutes. Clearly, both NIO&#39;s solution, as well as Lucid&#39;s solution, seem superior compared to what Tesla is offering.</p><p><blockquote>例如，蔚来的电池交换技术允许其客户在几分钟内充满“充电”，而大多数其他电动汽车需要更长的时间才能充满电。Lucid不采用电池更换，但其经过赛车测试的900V技术既可以实现巨大的续航里程，又可以实现快速充电速度——Lucid的架构允许客户在短短20分钟内充电长达300英里的电量。作为参考，特斯拉S采用约400V架构，允许客户在15分钟内充电200英里。显然，蔚来的解决方案和Lucid的解决方案似乎都优于特斯拉提供的解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s and Lucid&#39;s tech also looks highly competitive when it comes to their respective batteries. The Lucid Air Dream has an EPA range of 520 miles, which should be sufficient for almost all use cases. NIO has a larger product portfolio compared to Lucid, but when we take a look at its top-end sedan, battery performance looks even better. The NIO ET7, with a 150kWh battery (smaller options are available, too), has a range of up to 1,000km, which equates to around 620 miles of range. Again, both NIO and Lucid perform well compared to Tesla - the flagship S Plaid has an EPA range of 350 miles. Thanks to its experience in developing and supplying racing engines for electric race cars, Lucid crafts an especially efficient engine:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid的技术在各自的电池方面看起来也很有竞争力。Lucid Air Dream的EPA续航里程为520英里，对于几乎所有用例来说都足够了。与Lucid相比，蔚来拥有更大的产品组合，但当我们看看它的高端轿车时，电池性能看起来甚至更好。蔚来ET7配备150kWh电池（也有更小的选择），续航里程可达1,000公里，相当于约620英里的续航里程。同样，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和Lucid的表现都很好——旗舰S Plaid的EPA续航里程为350英里。凭借其在为电动赛车开发和供应赛车发动机方面的经验，Lucid制造了一款特别高效的发动机：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf92a9709beceb826f2e86b3bc25dd6\" tg-width=\"1502\" tg-height=\"829\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: Lucid presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Lucid演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>A smaller, more efficient engine results in lower resource usage and reduces the weight of the vehicle, all else equal. This does, in turn, lead to a longer range, and it also allows for better handling and driving performance, all else equal. Lucid is by far not the biggest EV player today, but its engineers have developed some of the most compelling products and solutions among all currently active EV players.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件相同的情况下，更小、更高效的发动机可以降低资源使用量并减轻车辆重量。反过来，这确实会带来更长的续航里程，并且在其他条件相同的情况下，还可以实现更好的操控和驾驶性能。到目前为止，Lucid还不是当今最大的电动汽车参与者，但其工程师已经开发出了一些目前所有活跃的电动汽车参与者中最引人注目的产品和解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO puts a lot of focus on technologies that will eventually allow for autonomous driving and puts massive numbers of sensors and huge computing power in its vehicles today. The ET7 uses the following sensing units for that goal:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来非常关注最终实现自动驾驶的技术，并在当今的车辆中安装了大量传感器和巨大的计算能力。ET7使用以下传感单元来实现此目标：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b39530a306d0b27d76d36bccec0e147d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"331\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: NIO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：蔚来</span></p></blockquote></p><p>With 33 sensors that use up to 8MP, NIO&#39;s sensing capabilities easily blow away those of Tesla. The Tesla Model 3, which is, according to CEO Musk, ready for full-self-driving, only uses 8 cameras with 1.2MP each. One of NIO&#39;s sensors in the ET7 thus has almost as much sensing performance as all of the cameras in the M3 combined - and NIO uses 32 additional sensors in its model. Clearly, NIO&#39;s offering is superior - and that obviously comes at a price, as NIO is not skimping when it comes to putting the best tech in its vehicles. This is also showcased by the massive processing power of the chips NIO uses in the ET7. The ET7 uses four NVIDIA (NVDA) Orin SoCs, each of which offers slightly more than 250 trillion operations per second, which makes for combined computing power of more than 1,000 TOPS - unheard of in any production vehicle. Using four SoCs at the same time also provides for the redundancy that is required for critical systems in a self-driving scenario. it should be noted that NIO&#39;s self-driving tech is not as excellent on the software side - yet. At least for now, peers such as XPeng (XPEV) seem to employ the stronger algorithms, but that is a problem that NIO can solve over the coming quarters and years, and integrating future software in its vehicles that come with top-notch hardware shouldn&#39;t be a very difficult task. Lucid&#39;s self-driving tech, even though it doesn&#39;t get a lot of recognition yet, is not looking bad at all, either. The DreamDrive suite utilizes 32 onboard sensors, almost on par with NIO&#39;s Aquila system (and 4x more sensors compared to the M3, which is allegedly L5 ready from a hardware perspective).</p><p><blockquote>凭借33个高达800万像素的传感器，蔚来的传感能力轻松击败了特斯拉。据首席执行官马斯克称，特斯拉Model 3已准备好实现全自动驾驶，仅使用8个摄像头，每个摄像头为120万像素。因此，ET7中蔚来的一个传感器的传感性能几乎相当于M3中所有摄像头的总和，而蔚来在其车型中使用了32个额外的传感器。显然，蔚来的产品是优越的——这显然是有代价的，因为蔚来在将最好的技术应用到其车辆中时并不吝啬。蔚来在ET7中使用的芯片的巨大处理能力也证明了这一点。ET7使用四个NVIDIA(NVDA)Orin SoC，每个SoC每秒提供略高于250万亿次运算，总计算能力超过1,000 TOPS，这在任何量产车中都是闻所未闻的。同时使用四个SoC还可以提供自动驾驶场景中关键系统所需的冗余。应该指出的是，蔚来的自动驾驶技术在软件方面还没有那么出色。至少目前，小鹏汽车（XPEV）等同行似乎采用了更强大的算法，但这是蔚来可以在未来几个季度和几年内解决的问题，并将未来的软件集成到配备顶级硬件的车辆中不应该是一项非常困难的任务。Lucid的自动驾驶技术尽管尚未得到太多认可，但看起来也一点也不差。DreamDrive套件使用32个板载传感器，几乎与蔚来的Aquila系统相当（与M3相比，传感器多4倍，据称从硬件角度来看，M3已准备好L5）。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Strong tech alone doesn&#39;t make for an attractive vehicle, however, as design, manufacturing quality, etc. have to be considered as well. Luckily, both NIO and Lucid compete very well on that basis, although the data on Lucid is still limited due to the low sales numbers - not too many people have driven a Lucid Air yet, thus data about reliability, etc. is limited. NIO, however, has been selling thousands of vehicles a month for quite some time, and its users are very satisfied with the vehicles&#39; quality. CnTechPost reports that J.D. Power has rated NIO the highest-quality EV company in China, ahead of Tesla. Lucid is not active in the country yet, but test drives by a wide range of auto journalists and magazines have generally resulted in very positive reviews. Both NIO and Lucid thus look strong from a design, quality, and tech perspective, with NIO putting more focus on customer-friendly items such as battery-swapping and driving assistance, whereas Lucid puts more focus on engine performance, battery tech, etc. Both avenues have their advantages, but I personally could see NIO benefit more from its easy-to-use, customer-friendly approach, as not too many people will buy an EV based on criteria such as the battery architecture. Still, Lucid&#39;s ability to develop high-performing vehicles should come in very handy in the highly competitive EV industry going forward.</p><p><blockquote>然而，仅靠强大的技术并不能造就一辆有吸引力的汽车，因为设计、制造质量等也必须考虑在内。幸运的是，蔚来和Lucid在此基础上竞争非常好，尽管由于销量较低，Lucid的数据仍然有限——还没有太多人驾驶过Lucid Air，因此有关可靠性等的数据有限。然而，蔚来已经有一段时间每月销售数千辆汽车，并且其用户对车辆的质量非常满意。CnTechPost报道J.D。Power将蔚来评为国内质量最高的电动汽车公司，领先于特斯拉。Lucid在该国尚未活跃，但众多汽车记者和杂志的试驾普遍获得了非常积极的评价。因此，从设计、质量和技术的角度来看，蔚来和Lucid看起来都很强大，蔚来更关注电池更换和驾驶辅助等客户友好型项目，而Lucid则更关注发动机性能、电池技术等。这两种途径都有其优势，但我个人认为蔚来从其易于使用、客户友好的方法中受益更多，因为没有太多人会根据电池架构等标准购买电动汽车。尽管如此，Lucid开发高性能汽车的能力在未来竞争激烈的电动汽车行业应该会非常方便。</blockquote></p><p>With NIO, the main risk the market seems to worry about now is regulation/politics. I personally do not believe that regulation will be a huge risk for NIO. Chinese companies never were able to compete successfully in the ICE vehicle space, but with EV technologies bringing change to the entire global automobile industry, China saw its chance to become a global automobile powerhouse. Hurting NIO and other Chinese EV players would run contrary to those goals, which is why I believe that China is more interested in nurturing its own EV players, including NIO, instead of hurting them. Still, the market puts a discount on every Chinese company today, and that holds true for NIO as well - which might be a good thing for those seeking to buy into the company at a below-average valuation.</p><p><blockquote>对于蔚来，市场现在担心的主要风险似乎是监管/政治。我个人不认为监管会给蔚来带来巨大风险。中国公司从未能够在内燃机汽车领域成功竞争，但随着电动汽车技术给整个全球汽车行业带来变革，中国看到了成为全球汽车强国的机会。伤害蔚来和其他中国电动汽车企业将与这些目标背道而驰，这就是为什么我认为中国更有兴趣培养自己的电动汽车企业，包括蔚来，而不是伤害他们。尽管如此，如今市场对每家中国公司都给予了折扣，蔚来也是如此——这对于那些寻求以低于平均水平的估值买入该公司的人来说可能是一件好事。</blockquote></p><p>For Lucid, regulation doesn&#39;t seem like an important risk. Instead, the main risks here are the high valuation and the production ramp. As Tesla has shown, ramping up vehicle production is no easy task. The company oftentimes had to battle with delays and other issues, sometimes summarized as &#34;Production Hell&#34;. The same could hold true for Lucid, which will have to ramp up production at a high speed in the coming months and quarters in order to meet its ambitious production goals. It&#39;s not a certainty that it will experience similar issues to other manufacturers, of course, but due to a lack of experience, this seems a considerable risk worth keeping an eye on. On top of that, LCID&#39;s high valuation could be a considerable risk - shares trade at around 30x next year&#39;s expected revenue, and there is no guarantee at all that those revenues will actually be generated.</p><p><blockquote>对于Lucid来说，监管似乎并不是一个重要的风险。相反，这里的主要风险是高估值和产量增加。正如特斯拉所表明的那样，提高汽车产量并不是一件容易的事。该公司经常不得不与延误和其他问题作斗争，有时被总结为“生产地狱”。Lucid可能也是如此，该公司将不得不在未来几个月和几个季度高速提高产量，以实现其雄心勃勃的生产目标。当然，不能确定它会遇到与其他制造商类似的问题，但由于缺乏经验，这似乎是一个值得关注的相当大的风险。最重要的是，LCID的高估值可能是一个相当大的风险——股票交易价格约为明年预期收入的30倍，而且根本不能保证这些收入会真正产生。</blockquote></p><p><b>Is Lucid Or NIO Stock The Better Buy?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid或蔚来股票更值得购买吗？</b></blockquote></p><p>Both NIO and Lucid have attractive products that seem highly competitive in the EV market that is seeing more and more entrants. I do believe that both companies will have operational success over the coming years, driven by strong tech, attractive brands, and compelling product quality. Operational growth does not necessarily result in share price growth, however, as valuations can be a major hurdle when one buys at a price that is too high.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid都拥有有吸引力的产品，这些产品在越来越多进入者的电动汽车市场中似乎极具竞争力。我确实相信，在强大的技术、有吸引力的品牌和引人注目的产品质量的推动下，两家公司将在未来几年取得运营成功。然而，运营增长并不一定会导致股价增长，因为当以过高的价格买入时，估值可能会成为主要障碍。</blockquote></p><p>In NIO&#39;s case, that does not seem like an overly large risk, as shares are inexpensive relative to how other EV players are valued - NIO trades at ~4x next year&#39;s expected revenue, which represents a clear discount compared to LCID, RIVN, TSLA, and so on. Lucid, on the other hand, is trading at a very premium valuation of 30x next year&#39;s sales.</p><p><blockquote>就蔚来而言，这似乎并不是一个过大的风险，因为相对于其他电动汽车公司的估值而言，其股价并不昂贵——蔚来的交易价格约为明年预期收入的4倍，与LCID、RIVN、TSLA相比有明显的折扣，等等。另一方面，Lucid的估值非常高，是明年销售额的30倍。</blockquote></p><p>I do believe that, based on its larger size, more established operations, better progress in ramping production, and due to its much more reasonable valuation, NIO is the better pick among these two today.The recent share price decline makes for an attractive entry point for those interested in owning this top-notch Chinese EV player.</p><p><blockquote>我确实相信，基于其更大的规模、更成熟的业务、更好的增产进展，以及更合理的估值，蔚来是当今这两家公司中更好的选择。对于那些有兴趣拥有这家顶级中国电动汽车公司的人来说，最近的股价下跌是一个有吸引力的切入点。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lucid Vs. NIO Stock: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?<blockquote>Lucid与蔚来股票：哪只电动汽车股票更值得购买？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLucid Vs. NIO Stock: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?<blockquote>Lucid与蔚来股票：哪只电动汽车股票更值得购买？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-30 23:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body><b>总结</b></body></html></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>The EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.</li><li>Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and great tech, which allow them to demand high ASPs.</li><li>NIO seems like the lower-risk choice among these two, and due to being a lot farther along from a production ramp perspective, it is, I believe, the better choice today.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe01e445aec1bb67f1b8d810f551603\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1025\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>电动汽车市场的竞争越来越激烈。拥有强大的品牌或技术对于公司脱颖而出非常重要。</li><li>蔚来和LCID都拥有强大的品牌和出色的技术，这使得它们能够要求很高的平均售价。</li><li>蔚来似乎是这两者中风险较低的选择，而且由于从产量增长的角度来看，它走得更远，我相信它是当今更好的选择。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock社论来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p>The EV space has brought up many companies that do not seem too viable in the long run, but there are also strong contenders apart from Tesla (TSLA). In this report, we&#39;ll pit Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO) against each other - two of the most interesting EV players that combine strong brands and high-end technological capabilities. In this report, we&#39;ll take a deeper dive into the tech and product side and will look at individual risks for both companies. Overall, I do believe that NIO is the more attractive choice among these two at current prices.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域催生了许多从长远来看似乎不太可行的公司，但除了特斯拉（TSLA）之外，也有强有力的竞争者。在本报告中，我们将对Lucid Group，Inc.(LCID)和蔚来（蔚来）进行对比，这两家最有趣的电动汽车公司结合了强大的品牌和高端技术能力。在本报告中，我们将更深入地探讨技术和产品方面，并探讨两家公司的个别风险。总体而言，我确实相信以目前的价格来看，蔚来是这两个选择中更具吸引力的。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid And NIO In The EV Market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>电动汽车市场的Lucid和蔚来</b></blockquote></p><p>The global EV market has been growing rapidly, with EV sales likely coming in a little north of six million, which is roughly twice as high as during the previous year. Clearly, EVs are a huge growth sector in the global automobile market, although it should be noted that most vehicles sold around the world are still powered by internal combustion engines. Over the years, EV market share should continue to climb rapidly, but it is not looking like EVs will dominate ICE vehicles any time soon.</p><p><blockquote>全球电动汽车市场一直在快速增长，电动汽车销量可能略高于600万辆，大约是上一年的两倍。显然，电动汽车是全球汽车市场的一个巨大增长领域，尽管应该指出的是，全球销售的大多数车辆仍然由内燃机驱动。多年来，电动汽车市场份额应该会继续快速攀升，但电动汽车似乎不会很快主导内燃机汽车。</blockquote></p><p>The market leaders in the EV space are Tesla and BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY), and, depending on how one counts plug-in hybrids, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY). NIO Inc. and Lucid Group, Inc. are not among the largest companies for now. NIO is selling around 11,000 vehicles a month right now, which translates into a ~130,000 annual sales pace. Sales have been growing quickly, however, which is why NIO will most likely sell more than 130,000 vehicles next year, as deliveries should continue to climb sequentially. Lucid is way smaller for now, in terms of deliveries, as the company has likely sold a couple of hundred vehicles this year. Next year, Lucid Group targets deliveries of around 20,000 vehicles - up by a lot versus 2021, but still a relatively small number compared to the deliveries NIO and many other peers will hit next year.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域的市场领导者是特斯拉和比亚迪（OTCPK：BYDDY），以及大众汽车（OTCPK：VWAGY），具体取决于插电式混合动力车的计算方式。蔚来和Lucid Group，Inc.目前还不是最大的公司。蔚来目前每月销售约11,000辆汽车，相当于年销量约130,000辆。然而，销量一直在快速增长，这就是为什么蔚来明年的销量很可能会超过13万辆，因为交付量应该会继续连续攀升。就交付量而言，Lucid目前的规模要小得多，因为该公司今年可能已售出数百辆汽车。明年，Lucid Group的目标是交付约20,000辆汽车，比2021年增长很多，但与蔚来和许多其他同行明年的交付量相比，这个数字仍然相对较小。</blockquote></p><p><b>LCID Vs. NIO&#39;s Past Quarterly Performance</b></p><p><blockquote><b>LCID与蔚来过去的季度表现</b></blockquote></p><p>As noted above, NIO&#39;s sales performance was way stronger than that of Lucid over the last three months, but that was hardly a surprise as LCID just began delivering vehicles to customers. On a share price basis, however, Lucid fared better:</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，蔚来过去三个月的销售业绩远强于Lucid，但这并不奇怪，因为LCID刚刚开始向客户交付车辆。然而，从股价来看，Lucid的表现更好：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7a6e7cb1b1485f32cc25ade9f387a5b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Over the last three months, LCID is up close to 50%, whereas NIO saw its shares drop by close to 20% over the same time frame. In NIO&#39;s case, macro worries about Chinese regulation played a role, whereas LCID benefitted a lot from growing enthusiasm for US-based EV players caused by Rivian&#39;s (RIVN) huge IPO success. On top of that, the start of deliveries also attracted new investors to Lucid&#39;s stock. If analysts are correct, NIO is the much better value today:</p><p><blockquote>过去三个月，LCID上涨了近50%，而蔚来的股价同期下跌了近20%。就蔚来而言，对中国监管的宏观担忧发挥了作用，而LCID则从Rivian(RIVN)IPO的巨大成功引发的对美国电动汽车企业日益增长的热情中受益匪浅。最重要的是，交付的开始也吸引了新投资者购买Lucid的股票。如果分析师是正确的，那么蔚来今天的价值要高得多：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b1d0939d657b284e25d8447ccb211b5\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shares are trading at less than half the consensus price target, which implies 100%+ upside over the next year, whereas LCID is trading almost perfectly in line with the current consensus price target - which implies no upside over the next year. NIO&#39;s underperformance over the last quarter thus seems to position the company well for a strong performance from the current level, whereas the same can&#39;t be said about Lucid.</p><p><blockquote>该股的交易价格不到共识价格目标的一半，这意味着明年有100%以上的上涨空间，而LCID的交易价格几乎完全符合当前的共识价格目标，这意味着明年没有上涨空间。因此，蔚来上个季度的表现不佳似乎使该公司在当前水平上表现强劲，而Lucid则不然。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid Vs. NIO Key Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid与蔚来关键指标</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>Let&#39;s take a deeper look at the tech of the two companies, as well as at their branding, and their specific key risks. Both NIO and Lucid are active in the high-end segment of the EV industry, selling vehicles with ASPs well north of the average Tesla. NIO&#39;s ASP is around $70,000, and Lucid&#39;s ASP is even higher than that for now, as the company is selling the most expensive Air<i>Dream</i>version first. Tesla, the current EV leader, has an ASP of around $50,000. Both NIO and Tesla are thus operating in a more luxurious, higher-end segment of the market compared to Tesla. How are these companies able to demand way higher ASPs than Tesla? There are several factors at play, including branding, but one of the most important factors is their great tech.</p><p><blockquote>让我们更深入地了解这两家公司的技术、品牌及其具体的主要风险。蔚来和Lucid都活跃在电动汽车行业的高端领域，销售的汽车平均售价远高于特斯拉的平均水平。蔚来的平均售价约为7万美元，Lucid的平均售价目前甚至更高，因为该公司销售的是最昂贵的Air<i>梦想</i>版本优先。特斯拉是目前电动汽车的领导者，其平均售价约为50,000美元。因此，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和特斯拉都在更豪华、更高端的细分市场运营。这些公司怎么能要求比特斯拉高得多的平均售价呢？有几个因素在起作用，包括品牌，但最重要的因素之一是他们出色的技术。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s battery-swapping technology, for example, allows its customers to fully &#34;recharge&#34; in a couple of minutes, while most other EVs take way longer to fully charge. Lucid doesn&#39;t employ battery-swapping, but its racing-tested 900V technology allows for both a huge range as well as for fast charging speeds - Lucid&#39;s architecture allows customers to charge up to 300 miles worth of energy in just 20 minutes. The Tesla S, for reference, uses a ~400V architecture that allows customers to recharge 200 miles in 15 minutes. Clearly, both NIO&#39;s solution, as well as Lucid&#39;s solution, seem superior compared to what Tesla is offering.</p><p><blockquote>例如，蔚来的电池交换技术允许其客户在几分钟内充满“充电”，而大多数其他电动汽车需要更长的时间才能充满电。Lucid不采用电池更换，但其经过赛车测试的900V技术既可以实现巨大的续航里程，又可以实现快速充电速度——Lucid的架构允许客户在短短20分钟内充电长达300英里的电量。作为参考，特斯拉S采用约400V架构，允许客户在15分钟内充电200英里。显然，蔚来的解决方案和Lucid的解决方案似乎都优于特斯拉提供的解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s and Lucid&#39;s tech also looks highly competitive when it comes to their respective batteries. The Lucid Air Dream has an EPA range of 520 miles, which should be sufficient for almost all use cases. NIO has a larger product portfolio compared to Lucid, but when we take a look at its top-end sedan, battery performance looks even better. The NIO ET7, with a 150kWh battery (smaller options are available, too), has a range of up to 1,000km, which equates to around 620 miles of range. Again, both NIO and Lucid perform well compared to Tesla - the flagship S Plaid has an EPA range of 350 miles. Thanks to its experience in developing and supplying racing engines for electric race cars, Lucid crafts an especially efficient engine:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid的技术在各自的电池方面看起来也很有竞争力。Lucid Air Dream的EPA续航里程为520英里，对于几乎所有用例来说都足够了。与Lucid相比，蔚来拥有更大的产品组合，但当我们看看它的高端轿车时，电池性能看起来甚至更好。蔚来ET7配备150kWh电池（也有更小的选择），续航里程可达1,000公里，相当于约620英里的续航里程。同样，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和Lucid的表现都很好——旗舰S Plaid的EPA续航里程为350英里。凭借其在为电动赛车开发和供应赛车发动机方面的经验，Lucid制造了一款特别高效的发动机：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf92a9709beceb826f2e86b3bc25dd6\" tg-width=\"1502\" tg-height=\"829\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: Lucid presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Lucid演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>A smaller, more efficient engine results in lower resource usage and reduces the weight of the vehicle, all else equal. This does, in turn, lead to a longer range, and it also allows for better handling and driving performance, all else equal. Lucid is by far not the biggest EV player today, but its engineers have developed some of the most compelling products and solutions among all currently active EV players.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件相同的情况下，更小、更高效的发动机可以降低资源使用量并减轻车辆重量。反过来，这确实会带来更长的续航里程，并且在其他条件相同的情况下，还可以实现更好的操控和驾驶性能。到目前为止，Lucid还不是当今最大的电动汽车参与者，但其工程师已经开发出了一些目前所有活跃的电动汽车参与者中最引人注目的产品和解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO puts a lot of focus on technologies that will eventually allow for autonomous driving and puts massive numbers of sensors and huge computing power in its vehicles today. The ET7 uses the following sensing units for that goal:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来非常关注最终实现自动驾驶的技术，并在当今的车辆中安装了大量传感器和巨大的计算能力。ET7使用以下传感单元来实现此目标：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b39530a306d0b27d76d36bccec0e147d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"331\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: NIO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：蔚来</span></p></blockquote></p><p>With 33 sensors that use up to 8MP, NIO&#39;s sensing capabilities easily blow away those of Tesla. The Tesla Model 3, which is, according to CEO Musk, ready for full-self-driving, only uses 8 cameras with 1.2MP each. One of NIO&#39;s sensors in the ET7 thus has almost as much sensing performance as all of the cameras in the M3 combined - and NIO uses 32 additional sensors in its model. Clearly, NIO&#39;s offering is superior - and that obviously comes at a price, as NIO is not skimping when it comes to putting the best tech in its vehicles. This is also showcased by the massive processing power of the chips NIO uses in the ET7. The ET7 uses four NVIDIA (NVDA) Orin SoCs, each of which offers slightly more than 250 trillion operations per second, which makes for combined computing power of more than 1,000 TOPS - unheard of in any production vehicle. Using four SoCs at the same time also provides for the redundancy that is required for critical systems in a self-driving scenario. it should be noted that NIO&#39;s self-driving tech is not as excellent on the software side - yet. At least for now, peers such as XPeng (XPEV) seem to employ the stronger algorithms, but that is a problem that NIO can solve over the coming quarters and years, and integrating future software in its vehicles that come with top-notch hardware shouldn&#39;t be a very difficult task. Lucid&#39;s self-driving tech, even though it doesn&#39;t get a lot of recognition yet, is not looking bad at all, either. The DreamDrive suite utilizes 32 onboard sensors, almost on par with NIO&#39;s Aquila system (and 4x more sensors compared to the M3, which is allegedly L5 ready from a hardware perspective).</p><p><blockquote>凭借33个高达800万像素的传感器，蔚来的传感能力轻松击败了特斯拉。据首席执行官马斯克称，特斯拉Model 3已准备好实现全自动驾驶，仅使用8个摄像头，每个摄像头为120万像素。因此，ET7中蔚来的一个传感器的传感性能几乎相当于M3中所有摄像头的总和，而蔚来在其车型中使用了32个额外的传感器。显然，蔚来的产品是优越的——这显然是有代价的，因为蔚来在将最好的技术应用到其车辆中时并不吝啬。蔚来在ET7中使用的芯片的巨大处理能力也证明了这一点。ET7使用四个NVIDIA(NVDA)Orin SoC，每个SoC每秒提供略高于250万亿次运算，总计算能力超过1,000 TOPS，这在任何量产车中都是闻所未闻的。同时使用四个SoC还可以提供自动驾驶场景中关键系统所需的冗余。应该指出的是，蔚来的自动驾驶技术在软件方面还没有那么出色。至少目前，小鹏汽车（XPEV）等同行似乎采用了更强大的算法，但这是蔚来可以在未来几个季度和几年内解决的问题，并将未来的软件集成到配备顶级硬件的车辆中不应该是一项非常困难的任务。Lucid的自动驾驶技术尽管尚未得到太多认可，但看起来也一点也不差。DreamDrive套件使用32个板载传感器，几乎与蔚来的Aquila系统相当（与M3相比，传感器多4倍，据称从硬件角度来看，M3已准备好L5）。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Strong tech alone doesn&#39;t make for an attractive vehicle, however, as design, manufacturing quality, etc. have to be considered as well. Luckily, both NIO and Lucid compete very well on that basis, although the data on Lucid is still limited due to the low sales numbers - not too many people have driven a Lucid Air yet, thus data about reliability, etc. is limited. NIO, however, has been selling thousands of vehicles a month for quite some time, and its users are very satisfied with the vehicles&#39; quality. CnTechPost reports that J.D. Power has rated NIO the highest-quality EV company in China, ahead of Tesla. Lucid is not active in the country yet, but test drives by a wide range of auto journalists and magazines have generally resulted in very positive reviews. Both NIO and Lucid thus look strong from a design, quality, and tech perspective, with NIO putting more focus on customer-friendly items such as battery-swapping and driving assistance, whereas Lucid puts more focus on engine performance, battery tech, etc. Both avenues have their advantages, but I personally could see NIO benefit more from its easy-to-use, customer-friendly approach, as not too many people will buy an EV based on criteria such as the battery architecture. Still, Lucid&#39;s ability to develop high-performing vehicles should come in very handy in the highly competitive EV industry going forward.</p><p><blockquote>然而，仅靠强大的技术并不能造就一辆有吸引力的汽车，因为设计、制造质量等也必须考虑在内。幸运的是，蔚来和Lucid在此基础上竞争非常好，尽管由于销量较低，Lucid的数据仍然有限——还没有太多人驾驶过Lucid Air，因此有关可靠性等的数据有限。然而，蔚来已经有一段时间每月销售数千辆汽车，并且其用户对车辆的质量非常满意。CnTechPost报道J.D。Power将蔚来评为国内质量最高的电动汽车公司，领先于特斯拉。Lucid在该国尚未活跃，但众多汽车记者和杂志的试驾普遍获得了非常积极的评价。因此，从设计、质量和技术的角度来看，蔚来和Lucid看起来都很强大，蔚来更关注电池更换和驾驶辅助等客户友好型项目，而Lucid则更关注发动机性能、电池技术等。这两种途径都有其优势，但我个人认为蔚来从其易于使用、客户友好的方法中受益更多，因为没有太多人会根据电池架构等标准购买电动汽车。尽管如此，Lucid开发高性能汽车的能力在未来竞争激烈的电动汽车行业应该会非常方便。</blockquote></p><p>With NIO, the main risk the market seems to worry about now is regulation/politics. I personally do not believe that regulation will be a huge risk for NIO. Chinese companies never were able to compete successfully in the ICE vehicle space, but with EV technologies bringing change to the entire global automobile industry, China saw its chance to become a global automobile powerhouse. Hurting NIO and other Chinese EV players would run contrary to those goals, which is why I believe that China is more interested in nurturing its own EV players, including NIO, instead of hurting them. Still, the market puts a discount on every Chinese company today, and that holds true for NIO as well - which might be a good thing for those seeking to buy into the company at a below-average valuation.</p><p><blockquote>对于蔚来，市场现在担心的主要风险似乎是监管/政治。我个人不认为监管会给蔚来带来巨大风险。中国公司从未能够在内燃机汽车领域成功竞争，但随着电动汽车技术给整个全球汽车行业带来变革，中国看到了成为全球汽车强国的机会。伤害蔚来和其他中国电动汽车企业将与这些目标背道而驰，这就是为什么我认为中国更有兴趣培养自己的电动汽车企业，包括蔚来，而不是伤害他们。尽管如此，如今市场对每家中国公司都给予了折扣，蔚来也是如此——这对于那些寻求以低于平均水平的估值买入该公司的人来说可能是一件好事。</blockquote></p><p>For Lucid, regulation doesn&#39;t seem like an important risk. Instead, the main risks here are the high valuation and the production ramp. As Tesla has shown, ramping up vehicle production is no easy task. The company oftentimes had to battle with delays and other issues, sometimes summarized as &#34;Production Hell&#34;. The same could hold true for Lucid, which will have to ramp up production at a high speed in the coming months and quarters in order to meet its ambitious production goals. It&#39;s not a certainty that it will experience similar issues to other manufacturers, of course, but due to a lack of experience, this seems a considerable risk worth keeping an eye on. On top of that, LCID&#39;s high valuation could be a considerable risk - shares trade at around 30x next year&#39;s expected revenue, and there is no guarantee at all that those revenues will actually be generated.</p><p><blockquote>对于Lucid来说，监管似乎并不是一个重要的风险。相反，这里的主要风险是高估值和产量增加。正如特斯拉所表明的那样，提高汽车产量并不是一件容易的事。该公司经常不得不与延误和其他问题作斗争，有时被总结为“生产地狱”。Lucid可能也是如此，该公司将不得不在未来几个月和几个季度高速提高产量，以实现其雄心勃勃的生产目标。当然，不能确定它会遇到与其他制造商类似的问题，但由于缺乏经验，这似乎是一个值得关注的相当大的风险。最重要的是，LCID的高估值可能是一个相当大的风险——股票交易价格约为明年预期收入的30倍，而且根本不能保证这些收入会真正产生。</blockquote></p><p><b>Is Lucid Or NIO Stock The Better Buy?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid或蔚来股票更值得购买吗？</b></blockquote></p><p>Both NIO and Lucid have attractive products that seem highly competitive in the EV market that is seeing more and more entrants. I do believe that both companies will have operational success over the coming years, driven by strong tech, attractive brands, and compelling product quality. Operational growth does not necessarily result in share price growth, however, as valuations can be a major hurdle when one buys at a price that is too high.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid都拥有有吸引力的产品，这些产品在越来越多进入者的电动汽车市场中似乎极具竞争力。我确实相信，在强大的技术、有吸引力的品牌和引人注目的产品质量的推动下，两家公司将在未来几年取得运营成功。然而，运营增长并不一定会导致股价增长，因为当以过高的价格买入时，估值可能会成为主要障碍。</blockquote></p><p>In NIO&#39;s case, that does not seem like an overly large risk, as shares are inexpensive relative to how other EV players are valued - NIO trades at ~4x next year&#39;s expected revenue, which represents a clear discount compared to LCID, RIVN, TSLA, and so on. Lucid, on the other hand, is trading at a very premium valuation of 30x next year&#39;s sales.</p><p><blockquote>就蔚来而言，这似乎并不是一个过大的风险，因为相对于其他电动汽车公司的估值而言，其股价并不昂贵——蔚来的交易价格约为明年预期收入的4倍，与LCID、RIVN、TSLA相比有明显的折扣，等等。另一方面，Lucid的估值非常高，是明年销售额的30倍。</blockquote></p><p>I do believe that, based on its larger size, more established operations, better progress in ramping production, and due to its much more reasonable valuation, NIO is the better pick among these two today.The recent share price decline makes for an attractive entry point for those interested in owning this top-notch Chinese EV player.</p><p><blockquote>我确实相信，基于其更大的规模、更成熟的业务、更好的增产进展，以及更合理的估值，蔚来是当今这两家公司中更好的选择。对于那些有兴趣拥有这家顶级中国电动汽车公司的人来说，最近的股价下跌是一个有吸引力的切入点。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477181-lucid-vs-nio-stock-better-buy\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LCID":"Lucid Group Inc","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477181-lucid-vs-nio-stock-better-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139674064","content_text":"SummaryThe EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and great tech, which allow them to demand high ASPs.NIO seems like the lower-risk choice among these two, and due to being a lot farther along from a production ramp perspective, it is, I believe, the better choice today.Trygve Finkelsen/iStock Editorial via Getty ImagesArticle ThesisThe EV space has brought up many companies that do not seem too viable in the long run, but there are also strong contenders apart from Tesla (TSLA). In this report, we'll pit Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO) against each other - two of the most interesting EV players that combine strong brands and high-end technological capabilities. In this report, we'll take a deeper dive into the tech and product side and will look at individual risks for both companies. Overall, I do believe that NIO is the more attractive choice among these two at current prices.Lucid And NIO In The EV MarketThe global EV market has been growing rapidly, with EV sales likely coming in a little north of six million, which is roughly twice as high as during the previous year. Clearly, EVs are a huge growth sector in the global automobile market, although it should be noted that most vehicles sold around the world are still powered by internal combustion engines. Over the years, EV market share should continue to climb rapidly, but it is not looking like EVs will dominate ICE vehicles any time soon.The market leaders in the EV space are Tesla and BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY), and, depending on how one counts plug-in hybrids, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY). NIO Inc. and Lucid Group, Inc. are not among the largest companies for now. NIO is selling around 11,000 vehicles a month right now, which translates into a ~130,000 annual sales pace. Sales have been growing quickly, however, which is why NIO will most likely sell more than 130,000 vehicles next year, as deliveries should continue to climb sequentially. Lucid is way smaller for now, in terms of deliveries, as the company has likely sold a couple of hundred vehicles this year. Next year, Lucid Group targets deliveries of around 20,000 vehicles - up by a lot versus 2021, but still a relatively small number compared to the deliveries NIO and many other peers will hit next year.LCID Vs. NIO's Past Quarterly PerformanceAs noted above, NIO's sales performance was way stronger than that of Lucid over the last three months, but that was hardly a surprise as LCID just began delivering vehicles to customers. On a share price basis, however, Lucid fared better:Data by YChartsOver the last three months, LCID is up close to 50%, whereas NIO saw its shares drop by close to 20% over the same time frame. In NIO's case, macro worries about Chinese regulation played a role, whereas LCID benefitted a lot from growing enthusiasm for US-based EV players caused by Rivian's (RIVN) huge IPO success. On top of that, the start of deliveries also attracted new investors to Lucid's stock. If analysts are correct, NIO is the much better value today:Data by YChartsShares are trading at less than half the consensus price target, which implies 100%+ upside over the next year, whereas LCID is trading almost perfectly in line with the current consensus price target - which implies no upside over the next year. NIO's underperformance over the last quarter thus seems to position the company well for a strong performance from the current level, whereas the same can't be said about Lucid.Lucid Vs. NIO Key MetricsLet's take a deeper look at the tech of the two companies, as well as at their branding, and their specific key risks. Both NIO and Lucid are active in the high-end segment of the EV industry, selling vehicles with ASPs well north of the average Tesla. NIO's ASP is around $70,000, and Lucid's ASP is even higher than that for now, as the company is selling the most expensive AirDreamversion first. Tesla, the current EV leader, has an ASP of around $50,000. Both NIO and Tesla are thus operating in a more luxurious, higher-end segment of the market compared to Tesla. How are these companies able to demand way higher ASPs than Tesla? There are several factors at play, including branding, but one of the most important factors is their great tech.NIO's battery-swapping technology, for example, allows its customers to fully \"recharge\" in a couple of minutes, while most other EVs take way longer to fully charge. Lucid doesn't employ battery-swapping, but its racing-tested 900V technology allows for both a huge range as well as for fast charging speeds - Lucid's architecture allows customers to charge up to 300 miles worth of energy in just 20 minutes. The Tesla S, for reference, uses a ~400V architecture that allows customers to recharge 200 miles in 15 minutes. Clearly, both NIO's solution, as well as Lucid's solution, seem superior compared to what Tesla is offering.NIO's and Lucid's tech also looks highly competitive when it comes to their respective batteries. The Lucid Air Dream has an EPA range of 520 miles, which should be sufficient for almost all use cases. NIO has a larger product portfolio compared to Lucid, but when we take a look at its top-end sedan, battery performance looks even better. The NIO ET7, with a 150kWh battery (smaller options are available, too), has a range of up to 1,000km, which equates to around 620 miles of range. Again, both NIO and Lucid perform well compared to Tesla - the flagship S Plaid has an EPA range of 350 miles. Thanks to its experience in developing and supplying racing engines for electric race cars, Lucid crafts an especially efficient engine:Source: Lucid presentationA smaller, more efficient engine results in lower resource usage and reduces the weight of the vehicle, all else equal. This does, in turn, lead to a longer range, and it also allows for better handling and driving performance, all else equal. Lucid is by far not the biggest EV player today, but its engineers have developed some of the most compelling products and solutions among all currently active EV players.NIO puts a lot of focus on technologies that will eventually allow for autonomous driving and puts massive numbers of sensors and huge computing power in its vehicles today. The ET7 uses the following sensing units for that goal:Source: NIOWith 33 sensors that use up to 8MP, NIO's sensing capabilities easily blow away those of Tesla. The Tesla Model 3, which is, according to CEO Musk, ready for full-self-driving, only uses 8 cameras with 1.2MP each. One of NIO's sensors in the ET7 thus has almost as much sensing performance as all of the cameras in the M3 combined - and NIO uses 32 additional sensors in its model. Clearly, NIO's offering is superior - and that obviously comes at a price, as NIO is not skimping when it comes to putting the best tech in its vehicles. This is also showcased by the massive processing power of the chips NIO uses in the ET7. The ET7 uses four NVIDIA (NVDA) Orin SoCs, each of which offers slightly more than 250 trillion operations per second, which makes for combined computing power of more than 1,000 TOPS - unheard of in any production vehicle. Using four SoCs at the same time also provides for the redundancy that is required for critical systems in a self-driving scenario. it should be noted that NIO's self-driving tech is not as excellent on the software side - yet. At least for now, peers such as XPeng (XPEV) seem to employ the stronger algorithms, but that is a problem that NIO can solve over the coming quarters and years, and integrating future software in its vehicles that come with top-notch hardware shouldn't be a very difficult task. Lucid's self-driving tech, even though it doesn't get a lot of recognition yet, is not looking bad at all, either. The DreamDrive suite utilizes 32 onboard sensors, almost on par with NIO's Aquila system (and 4x more sensors compared to the M3, which is allegedly L5 ready from a hardware perspective).Strong tech alone doesn't make for an attractive vehicle, however, as design, manufacturing quality, etc. have to be considered as well. Luckily, both NIO and Lucid compete very well on that basis, although the data on Lucid is still limited due to the low sales numbers - not too many people have driven a Lucid Air yet, thus data about reliability, etc. is limited. NIO, however, has been selling thousands of vehicles a month for quite some time, and its users are very satisfied with the vehicles' quality. CnTechPost reports that J.D. Power has rated NIO the highest-quality EV company in China, ahead of Tesla. Lucid is not active in the country yet, but test drives by a wide range of auto journalists and magazines have generally resulted in very positive reviews. Both NIO and Lucid thus look strong from a design, quality, and tech perspective, with NIO putting more focus on customer-friendly items such as battery-swapping and driving assistance, whereas Lucid puts more focus on engine performance, battery tech, etc. Both avenues have their advantages, but I personally could see NIO benefit more from its easy-to-use, customer-friendly approach, as not too many people will buy an EV based on criteria such as the battery architecture. Still, Lucid's ability to develop high-performing vehicles should come in very handy in the highly competitive EV industry going forward.With NIO, the main risk the market seems to worry about now is regulation/politics. I personally do not believe that regulation will be a huge risk for NIO. Chinese companies never were able to compete successfully in the ICE vehicle space, but with EV technologies bringing change to the entire global automobile industry, China saw its chance to become a global automobile powerhouse. Hurting NIO and other Chinese EV players would run contrary to those goals, which is why I believe that China is more interested in nurturing its own EV players, including NIO, instead of hurting them. Still, the market puts a discount on every Chinese company today, and that holds true for NIO as well - which might be a good thing for those seeking to buy into the company at a below-average valuation.For Lucid, regulation doesn't seem like an important risk. Instead, the main risks here are the high valuation and the production ramp. As Tesla has shown, ramping up vehicle production is no easy task. The company oftentimes had to battle with delays and other issues, sometimes summarized as \"Production Hell\". The same could hold true for Lucid, which will have to ramp up production at a high speed in the coming months and quarters in order to meet its ambitious production goals. It's not a certainty that it will experience similar issues to other manufacturers, of course, but due to a lack of experience, this seems a considerable risk worth keeping an eye on. On top of that, LCID's high valuation could be a considerable risk - shares trade at around 30x next year's expected revenue, and there is no guarantee at all that those revenues will actually be generated.Is Lucid Or NIO Stock The Better Buy?Both NIO and Lucid have attractive products that seem highly competitive in the EV market that is seeing more and more entrants. I do believe that both companies will have operational success over the coming years, driven by strong tech, attractive brands, and compelling product quality. Operational growth does not necessarily result in share price growth, however, as valuations can be a major hurdle when one buys at a price that is too high.In NIO's case, that does not seem like an overly large risk, as shares are inexpensive relative to how other EV players are valued - NIO trades at ~4x next year's expected revenue, which represents a clear discount compared to LCID, RIVN, TSLA, and so on. Lucid, on the other hand, is trading at a very premium valuation of 30x next year's sales.I do believe that, based on its larger size, more established operations, better progress in ramping production, and due to its much more reasonable valuation, NIO is the better pick among these two today.The recent share price decline makes for an attractive entry point for those interested in owning this top-notch Chinese EV player.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LCID":0.9,"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2082,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141629,"gmtCreate":1640884634942,"gmtModify":1640884635027,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool, soon the traditional car will be replace by ev&nbsp;","listText":"Cool, soon the traditional car will be replace by ev&nbsp;","text":"Cool, soon the traditional car will be replace by ev","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141629","repostId":"1132789312","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1132789312","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640875231,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1132789312?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 22:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1132789312","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks rallied in morning trading.Lucid, Nio, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, Farad","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>EV stocks rallied in morning trading.Lucid, Nio, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, Faraday Future, Workhorse and Lordstown climbed between 1% and 4%.While Tesla fell more than 2% after the company filed a recall of over 475,000 vehicles..</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>电动汽车股早盘上涨。Lucid、蔚来、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、Fisker、Nikola、Canoo、Faraday Future、Workhorse和Lordstown上涨1%至4%。而特斯拉在公司提出召回后下跌超过2%超过475,000辆汽车..</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5dbbcef1922d3641650b829b9b76c56\" tg-width=\"415\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/694f72dfeead61c37c1d280c0e9f4433\" tg-width=\"421\" tg-height=\"246\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 22:40</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>EV stocks rallied in morning trading.Lucid, Nio, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, Faraday Future, Workhorse and Lordstown climbed between 1% and 4%.While Tesla fell more than 2% after the company filed a recall of over 475,000 vehicles..</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>电动汽车股早盘上涨。Lucid、蔚来、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、Fisker、Nikola、Canoo、Faraday Future、Workhorse和Lordstown上涨1%至4%。而特斯拉在公司提出召回后下跌超过2%超过475,000辆汽车..</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5dbbcef1922d3641650b829b9b76c56\" tg-width=\"415\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/694f72dfeead61c37c1d280c0e9f4433\" tg-width=\"421\" tg-height=\"246\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FSR":"菲斯克","NIU":"小牛电动","LI":"理想汽车","RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","SEV":"Aptera Motors","WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","LCID":"Lucid Group Inc"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1132789312","content_text":"EV stocks rallied in morning trading.Lucid, Nio, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, Faraday Future, Workhorse and Lordstown climbed between 1% and 4%.While Tesla fell more than 2% after the company filed a recall of over 475,000 vehicles..","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOEV":0.9,"NIU":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"TSP":0.9,"RIDE":0.9,"FSR":0.9,"RIVN":0.9,"FFIE":0.9,"WKHS":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"LCID":0.9,"SEV":0.9,"LI":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"ARVL":0.9,"NKLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2441,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141898,"gmtCreate":1640884591822,"gmtModify":1640884591944,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141898","repostId":"1198843840","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198843840","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640876050,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198843840?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 22:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Some Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198843840","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fel","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>早盘部分半导体股下跌。美光科技跌超2%，AMD跌超1%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efacf4051c66545659fa3d5d20db533d\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"430\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Some Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSome Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 22:54</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>早盘部分半导体股下跌。美光科技跌超2%，AMD跌超1%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efacf4051c66545659fa3d5d20db533d\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"430\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MU":"美光科技","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198843840","content_text":"Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9,"MU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2311,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141121,"gmtCreate":1640884573871,"gmtModify":1640884573967,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Shoppe","listText":"Shoppe","text":"Shoppe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141121","repostId":"1106092668","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106092668","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640876653,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106092668?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 23:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Shares Jumped More Than 4% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨逾4%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106092668","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.Also Read:Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Unde","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨超过4%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/448dcc7d589843674730e046aa6ef96a\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>Also Read:</b><b>Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Understand The Recent Selloff</b></p><p><blockquote><b>另请阅读：</b><b>Sea Limited：深入了解最近的抛售</b></blockquote></p><p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Sea Limited is a highly diversified business firing on all cylinders in some of the fastest-growing economies in the world.</li><li>I dive into each of its segments to understand the recent selloff and justify the current valuation.</li><li>I consider Sea one of my ten highest conviction investments.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa5cbe0a30acc723a2c6f62300024002\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Sea Limited是一家高度多元化的企业，在世界上一些增长最快的经济体中全力以赴。</li><li>我深入研究了它的每个细分市场，以了解最近的抛售并证明当前估值的合理性。</li><li>我认为Sea是我最有信心的十项投资之一。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>kokkai/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>论文</b></blockquote></p><p>A by-parts analysis of Sea Limited&#39;s (NYSE:SE) segments shows that its current valuation is roughly fair, but there are many long-term growth drivers that could surprise to the upside and drive very strong returns for years to come.</p><p><blockquote>对Sea Limited（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SE）部门的细分分析表明，其目前的估值大致公平，但有许多长期增长动力可能会出人意料地上涨，并在未来几年推动非常强劲的回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Introduction</b></p><p><blockquote><b>介绍</b></blockquote></p><p>I recently wrote an article highlighting my top 10 stock picks for 2022. I&#39;d already done an in-depth analysis of my other nine picks in other Seeking Alpha articles, so I thought it would be good to close out the year with an article about Sea.</p><p><blockquote>我最近写了一篇文章，重点介绍了我选择的2022年十大股票。我已经在其他Seeking Alpha文章中对我的其他九个选择进行了深入分析，所以我认为最好以一篇关于Sea的文章来结束这一年。</blockquote></p><p>Furthermore, with shares down significantly over the past couple of months (but still slightly up for the year), I believe this article may prove timely. I don&#39;t speculate on short-term market movements, but I personally added to my Sea shares recently. It&#39;s one of my only losing positions that I didn&#39;t sell out of temporarily for tax-loss harvesting, and in this article, I will explain why Sea is such a high conviction holding for me.</p><p><blockquote>此外，由于过去几个月股价大幅下跌（但今年仍略有上涨），我相信这篇文章可能是及时的。我不推测短期市场走势，但我个人最近增持了Sea股票。这是我唯一没有为了收获税收损失而暂时卖出的亏损头寸之一，在本文中，我将解释为什么Sea对我来说是如此坚定的持有。</blockquote></p><p>It&#39;s also worth noting that many professional investors seem to share this opinion. Sea is the 121st largest company in the world, but it&#39;s the16thmost popular holding among hedge funds. This implies that big money is overweight Sea, with 71% of shares held by institutions.</p><p><blockquote>还值得注意的是，许多专业投资者似乎也认同这一观点。Sea是全球第121大公司，但在对冲基金中排名第16位。这暗示大资金是跑赢大盘海，71%的股份被机构持有。</blockquote></p><p>Because Sea operates in many different areas, I will do a separate analysis of each of its operating segments to justify its current valuation and explain how that valuation could drive unexpectedly strong returns for years.</p><p><blockquote>由于Sea在许多不同的领域开展业务，我将对其每个运营部门进行单独分析，以证明其当前估值的合理性，并解释该估值如何在多年来推动意想不到的强劲回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gaming</b></p><p><blockquote><b>游戏</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea Limited&#39;s gaming segment Garena is best known for Free Fire, a mobile battle royale game that was developed in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Sea Limited的游戏部门Garena因其内部开发的移动大逃杀游戏《Free Fire》而闻名。</blockquote></p><p>The game was released in 2017 and has been very popular ever since. It currently has the second most monthly active users among all Android games globally. The game is available worldwide, but it&#39;s particularly popular in emerging markets like SEA, LATAM, and India, where it&#39;s been the highest-grossing mobile game for over two years.</p><p><blockquote>该游戏于2017年发布，此后一直非常受欢迎。它目前在全球所有安卓游戏中拥有第二大月活跃用户。这款游戏在全球范围内都有售，但在东南亚、拉美和印度等新兴市场尤其受欢迎，两年多来，它一直是这些市场票房最高的手机游戏。</blockquote></p><p>With the game having been popular for a long time already, there&#39;s some concern that gamers will move on to the next big thing. Although there are some mobile games that are older than Free Fire and still very popular - like Roblox, Clash of Clans, and Pokemon Go - there are many more that have been forgotten. Until Garena releases more games and proves that it can be successful with them too, there will always be questions about whether its studio is a one-hit wonder.</p><p><blockquote>随着这款游戏已经流行了很长时间，有人担心游戏玩家会转向下一件大事。虽然有一些手机游戏比Free Fire更古老，但仍然非常受欢迎——如Roblox、Clash of Clans和Pokemon Go——但还有更多已经被遗忘。在Garena发布更多游戏并证明它也可以在这些游戏上取得成功之前，总会有人质疑它的工作室是否是一个昙花一现的奇迹。</blockquote></p><p>Regardless, Garena is a critical part of Sea because it&#39;s the only profitable segment and it doubles a social platform that provides free advertising for Sea&#39;s non-gaming products. Cross-promotion is a huge competitive advantage for Sea.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，Garena是Sea的重要组成部分，因为它是唯一盈利的细分市场，并且它是为Sea非游戏产品提供免费广告的社交平台的两倍。交叉推广是Sea的巨大竞争优势。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, one reason for Sea&#39;s recent selloff could be the Q4 guidance implied for Garena.</p><p><blockquote>因此，Sea最近抛售的原因之一可能是Garena暗示的第四季度指引。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e299727cc28a887a36d88831aec8f53\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"334\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Earnings Call Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：看涨期权收益演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>In Q2 this year, Garena raised its guidance to $4.5B-$4.7B for 2021 bookings (up from $4.3B-$4.5B). With the first three quarters already totaling $3.5B, this implies that Q4 bookings will come in at $1.0B-$1.2B, up between 0% and 20% year over year, and likely down sequentially. This is compared to 29% growth in the most recent quarter and 44% projected growth for the full year.</p><p><blockquote>今年第二季度，Garena将2021年预订量的指导上调至45亿美元至47亿美元（高于43亿美元至45亿美元）。由于前三个季度的总预订量已经达到$3.5 B，这意味着第四季度的预订量将达到$1.0 B-$1.2 B，同比增长0%至20%，并且可能会环比下降。相比之下，最近一个季度的增长率为29%，全年预计增长率为44%。</blockquote></p><p>While 20% isn&#39;t a terrible deceleration, 0% certainly is. Even 20% growth isn&#39;t spectacular compared to the historic levels. At the 10% midpoint, Garena&#39;s growth looks more similar to that of a mature company like Activision (NASDAQ:ATVI) or Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) than a fast-growing company like Roblox (NYSE:RBLX).</p><p><blockquote>虽然20%并不是一个可怕的减速，但0%肯定是。与历史水平相比，即使是20%的增长也并不引人注目。在10%的中点，Garena的增长看起来更类似于动视暴雪（纳斯达克股票代码：ATVI）或Zynga（纳斯达克股票代码：ZNGA）等成熟公司，而不是Roblox（纽约证券交易所股票代码：RBLX）等快速增长的公司。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Garena&#39;s implied valuation should - and did - suffer as a result. While a fast-growing company like Roblox can command a high double-digit P/S multiple, Activision and Zynga trade at an average P/S multiple of just 4. Garena is slightly more profitable than them and probably has more risk to the upside, so I&#39;ll use a P/S multiple of 5 for my implied valuation. This implies a P/E of about 10 for a business growing at around 10%, which is very reasonable in today&#39;s market.</p><p><blockquote>Garena的隐含估值应该——也确实——因此受到影响。虽然像Roblox这样快速增长的公司可以获得两位数的高市盈率，但动视暴雪和Zynga的平均市盈率仅为4倍。Garena的利润比他们略高，而且可能有更大的上行风险，因此我将使用市盈率倍数5作为我的隐含估值。这意味着一家增长率在10%左右的企业的市盈率约为10，这在当今市场上是非常合理的。</blockquote></p><p>This means Garena is worth $23.5B based on the high end of management&#39;s guidance.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着根据管理层指导的高端，Garena的价值为235亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>I believe this valuation is actually conservative for a few reasons:</p><p><blockquote>我相信这个估值实际上是保守的，原因有几个：</blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Next year has tough comps and growth could re-accelerate in the following years or even next year, especially if Garena releases a new hit game. The growth rate past next quarter is not based on explicit guidance from the company, only industry forecasts.</li><li>The peer valuations I used are from companies also trading at the lower end of their valuation range for the past year.</li><li>Garena has a good track record and is continuing to invest in Free Fire. One example of this is the recently released Free Fire MAX, which improves the experience for users with higher-end phones and even adds a metaverse-like customizable map called Craftland. To me, this implies that Garena believes Free Fire is still in the earlier part of its lifecycle.</li><li>Although I&#39;d obviously prefer that Garena develops more games in house, in the meantime it&#39;s still not a one-trick pony. In addition to Free Fire, Garena distributes games from third-party developers like Tencent (OTCMKTS:OTCPK:TCEHY). These are popular titles like League of Legends and Call of Duty, which meaningfully diversify Garena&#39;s revenue.</li></ul><b>E-Commerce</b></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>明年的竞争很艰难，增长可能会在接下来的几年甚至明年重新加速，特别是如果Garena发布一款新的热门游戏。下个季度的增长率不是基于公司的明确指导，而是基于行业预测。</li><li>我使用的同行估值来自去年交易价格也处于估值范围下限的公司。</li><li>Garena拥有良好的业绩记录，并将继续投资Free Fire。这方面的一个例子是最近发布的Free Fire MAX，它改善了高端手机用户的体验，甚至添加了一个类似元宇宙的可定制地图，称为Craftland。对我来说，这意味着Garena认为Free Fire仍处于其生命周期的早期阶段。</li><li>虽然我显然更希望Garena在内部开发更多的游戏，但与此同时，它仍然不是一匹只会一招的小马。除了Free Fire之外，Garena还发行腾讯控股(OTCMKTS：OTCPK：TCEHY)等第三方开发商的游戏。这些都是像《英雄联盟》和《使命看涨期权》这样受欢迎的游戏，它们有意义地使Garena的收入多样化。</li></ul><b>电子商务</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea&#39;s e-commerce platform Shopee is currently its big growth driver. This platform is often considered the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) of Southeast Asia, and it recently expanded into more markets including Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>Sea的电子商务平台Shopee目前是其最大的增长动力。该平台通常被认为是东南亚的亚马逊（纳斯达克：AMZN），最近它扩展到包括巴西在内的更多市场。</blockquote></p><p>There&#39;s always some debate about who is really the Amazon of a region. Shopee certainly has competition, including from Alibaba&#39;s (NYSE:BABA) Lazada, Tokopedia in Indonesia, MercadoLibre (MELI) in Brazil, and even Amazon itself. With most of the competition being private or tucked away into a larger company, many of the competitors don&#39;t publish exact revenue numbers, which makes it difficult to measure the competition. Even Sea hasn&#39;t published explicit revenue numbers for some countries like Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>关于谁是一个地区真正的亚马逊，总是有一些争论。Shopee当然面临竞争，包括来自阿里巴巴-SW(NYSE：BABA)的Lazada、印尼的Tokopedia、巴西的MercadoLibre(MELI)，甚至Amazon本身。由于大多数竞争都是私人的或隐藏在更大的公司中，许多竞争对手不会公布确切的收入数字，这使得衡量竞争变得困难。就连Sea也没有公布巴西等一些国家的明确收入数据。</blockquote></p><p>One neutral source that can be assessed is the Alexa site rank, which as its name suggests ranks sites by their popularity. Keep in mind that these are ranks, so a lower score is better.</p><p><blockquote>一个可以评估的中立来源是Alexa网站排名，顾名思义，它根据网站的受欢迎程度对网站进行排名。请记住，这些都是排名，所以分数越低越好。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/180367a2b64bccebf243c5b6d8fb776a\" tg-width=\"455\" tg-height=\"353\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from Alexa</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自Alexa</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shopee is very mobile-focused, but the above table only considers the website. To check App Store app ranks for the shopping category, we can use App Annie.</p><p><blockquote>Shopee非常专注于移动，但上表只考虑了网站。要查看购物类别的App Store应用排名，我们可以使用App Annie。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6544f014a5d70d13ee14dab0ac8b6782\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"403\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from AppAnnie</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自AppAnnie</span></p></blockquote></p><p>On the mobile side, there&#39;s no need to look at the competition because Shopee is consistently the number one shopping app in every country listed. In a mobile-first world, this bodes very well. Even on the web side, Shopee wins out except in a few specific regions like LATAM and (barely) Indonesia, which have more local competitors.</p><p><blockquote>在移动端，没有必要关注竞争，因为Shopee一直是每个国家排名第一的购物应用。在移动优先的世界里，这是个好兆头。即使在网络方面，Shopee也胜出，除了拉丁美洲和（勉强）印度尼西亚等少数特定地区，这些地区有更多的本地竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p>Of course, traffic doesn&#39;t always translate to GMV. But for a shopping app where most people will use the app to buy something, it&#39;s a decent proxy. A third party estimates that Shopee accounts for57%of all e-commerce in Southeast Asia. It&#39;s Shopee&#39;s dominance in the mobile app ranks and market share that make me consider it the Amazon of Southeast Asia.</p><p><blockquote>当然，流量并不总是转化为GMV。但对于一个大多数人都会使用该应用程序购买东西的购物应用程序来说，这是一个不错的代理。第三方估计Shopee占东南亚所有电子商务的57%。正是Shopee在移动应用排名和市场份额方面的主导地位让我认为它是东南亚的亚马逊。</blockquote></p><p>So why would a company with so much potential sell off?</p><p><blockquote>那么，为什么一家潜力如此之大的公司会抛售呢？</blockquote></p><p>After the recent earnings report, some analysts expressed concern that Shopee is branching out into other countries like Poland and Mexico before validating its business model in the current markets. In these countries, Shopee has less of a presence; it&#39;s bounced between the 3-5 spots on the Mexico App Store for shopping apps, and between spots 1 and 3 in Poland. Although analysts hate uncertainty - and the CEO&#39;s comments that they don&#39;t have a concrete measure of success in these earlier stage countries won&#39;t help with that - Shopee has a history of entering new countries successfully and I am willing to give management some time to try expanding more. After all, if they&#39;re successful, then it could drive even more unexpected growth in the future.</p><p><blockquote>在最近的财报发布后，一些分析师对Shopee在当前市场验证其商业模式之前将业务扩展到波兰和墨西哥等其他国家表示担忧。在这些国家，Shopee的影响力较小；它在墨西哥应用商店购物应用的3-5位之间波动，在波兰的1-3位之间波动。尽管分析师讨厌不确定性——而且首席执行官关于他们在这些早期国家没有具体的成功衡量标准的评论对此没有帮助——但Shopee有着成功进入新国家的历史，我愿意给管理层一些时间尝试进一步扩张。毕竟，如果他们成功了，那么它可能会在未来推动更多意想不到的增长。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Another complaint from analysts was that the basket size (average purchase size) is trending down. While that could also have contributed to the recent selloff, it&#39;s hard to complain when the overall sales increased a lot despite a decrease in basket size.</p><p><blockquote>分析师的另一个抱怨是篮子规模（平均购买规模）呈下降趋势。虽然这也可能导致了最近的抛售，但尽管篮子规模有所下降，但当整体销售额大幅增长时，很难抱怨。</blockquote></p><p>The company raised its guidance for e-commerce again in Q3, now guiding for $5.0B-$5.2B in 2021 e-commerce revenue. That&#39;s 75%-100% growth in Q4 and about 135% growth for the year. These are much more exciting numbers than the gaming side, although the guidance still implies a slight deceleration in Q4. But compared to Amazon&#39;s $340B in 2020 e-commerce sales, Shopee looks like it&#39;s just scratched the surface. E-commerce is at only11%penetration in Southeast Asia compared to18.7%in the USA, and Southeast Asia economies are generally growing faster than the USA&#39;s.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在第三季度再次上调了电子商务指引，目前预计2021年电子商务收入为$5.0 B-$5.2 B。第四季度增长75%-100%，全年增长约135%。这些数字比游戏方面更令人兴奋，尽管指导仍然意味着第四季度略有减速。但与亚马逊2020年3400亿美元的电子商务销售额相比，Shopee看起来只是触及了表面。电子商务在东南亚的渗透率仅为11%，而美国为18.7%，东南亚经济体的增长速度普遍高于美国。</blockquote></p><p>Despite being in a blue skies industry, it&#39;s more difficult to value the e-commerce segment because it operates at a loss (whereas the gaming segment is highly profitable). Shopee&#39;s success is not guaranteed because it&#39;s not clear at this point whether the platform can become profitable while retaining its market share. Stocks like this tend to experience more volatility, which could partially explain the recent selloff.</p><p><blockquote>尽管处于蓝天行业，但对电子商务部门进行估值更加困难，因为它处于亏损状态（而游戏部门利润丰厚）。Shopee的成功并不能保证，因为目前尚不清楚该平台能否在保持市场份额的同时实现盈利。像这样的股票往往会经历更大的波动，这可以部分解释最近的抛售。</blockquote></p><p>For unprofitable software companies, I like to use the Rule of 40 to assess the business. But it&#39;s difficult to apply this rule to a more cyclical e-commerce company with naturally lower margins. Even so, it&#39;s worth noting that despite being unprofitable, Sea&#39;s Rule of 40 score of 104 is better than most SaaS companies&#39;, and also better than e-commerce peers Amazon (21), MercadoLibre (73), and Alibaba (43).</p><p><blockquote>对于不盈利的软件公司，我喜欢用40法则来评估业务。但很难将这一规则应用于利润率自然较低、周期性较强的电子商务公司。即便如此，值得注意的是，尽管没有盈利，Sea的40分（104分）优于大多数SaaS公司，也优于电子商务同行Amazon（21分）、MercadoLibre（73分）和阿里巴巴-SW（43分）。</blockquote></p><p>To understand Shopee&#39;s terminal valuation once it becomes profitable, we can look at industry peers. Amazon is one profitable and slower-growing peer, and it trades at 4x P/S. AWS pushes this number up, but Amazon&#39;s high exposure to first-party sales offsets that. Other e-commerce marketplace peers trade at similar valuations: Alibaba at 3x P/S, MercadoLibre at 9x P/S. All of these valuations are basically all-time lows.</p><p><blockquote>要了解Shopee盈利后的终端估值，我们可以看看行业同行。亚马逊是一家盈利且增长较慢的同行，其市盈率为4倍。AWS推高了这一数字，但亚马逊对第一方销售的高敞口抵消了这一影响。其他电子商务市场同行的估值类似：阿里巴巴-SW的市盈率为3倍，MercadoLibre的市盈率为9倍。所有这些估值基本上都是历史低点。</blockquote></p><p>If Shopee keeps doubling revenue over the next couple of years (which it&#39;s easily done every year since 2016), becomes profitable (which scaling up tends to help with), and will have Amazon&#39;s P/S multiple in two years, then at 16 P/S today it would trade flat for two years. But if it keeps growing much faster than Amazon over a longer period like a decade, and/or if the overall industry multiples expand to more normal historical levels, then even at 16x P/S this segment has potential upside. On the other hand, if it stops growing or never becomes profitable then investors will be very disappointed at any P/S.</p><p><blockquote>如果Shopee在未来几年内收入持续翻倍（自2016年以来每年都很容易做到），实现盈利（扩大规模往往会有所帮助），并在两年内达到亚马逊的市盈率倍数，那么今天的市盈率为16倍，它将在两年内持平。但如果它在十年等较长时间内保持比亚马逊快得多的增长速度，和/或如果整个行业市盈率扩大到更正常的历史水平，那么即使市盈率为16倍，该细分市场也有潜在的上涨空间。另一方面，如果它停止增长或永远无法盈利，那么投资者将对任何市盈率感到非常失望。</blockquote></p><p>Given this wide range of outcomes, each person is going to have their own way of valuing this segment. For me, when I look at Shopee&#39;s mobile dominance, relatively small current size, the funding coming in from Garena, and the precedent set by Amazon, Alibaba, and MercadoLibre for the sustainable long-term success of this business model, I am optimistic about this segment&#39;s future. I recognize that it&#39;s currently an unprofitable and thus risky segment, but I also see the massive potential.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这种广泛的结果，每个人都会有自己的方式来评估这一部分。对我来说，当我看到Shopee的移动主导地位、目前相对较小的规模、来自Garena的资金以及Amazon、阿里巴巴-SW和MercadoLibre为这种商业模式的可持续长期成功树立的先例时，我对这个细分市场的未来持乐观态度。我认识到这是一个目前无利可图且存在风险的细分市场，但我也看到了巨大的潜力。</blockquote></p><p>So I am happy paying a 16x P/S multiple, which values the e-commerce segment at $83.2B. Some people will call that way too high, and those people will probably never get a chance to invest in this company, for better or for worse.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我很高兴支付16倍的市盈率，这使得电子商务部门的估值为$832亿。有些人的看涨期权太高，这些人可能永远没有机会投资这家公司，无论好坏。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, with just Garena and Shopee, I have Sea being worth $106.7B. Its current market cap is $123.1B. To account for the difference, let&#39;s look at the other parts of Sea.</p><p><blockquote>因此，仅算上Garena和Shopee，我认为Sea的价值为$1067亿。其目前的市值为$123.1 B。为了解释这种差异，让我们看看海洋的其他部分。</blockquote></p><p><b>FinTech &amp; Investments</b></p><p><blockquote><b>金融科技与投资</b></blockquote></p><p>The easiest addition to my computed valuation is Sea&#39;s $12B cash pile, partially offset by $4B in debt. This adds some nice optionality to the company and ensures that it won&#39;t be bankrupt any time soon despite losing money with Shopee. Adding in the $8B cash difference puts my computed valuation at $114.7B, just $8.4B short of the actual valuation.</p><p><blockquote>我计算的估值中最容易增加的是Sea的120B美元现金储备，部分被40亿美元的债务抵消。这为该公司增加了一些不错的选择，并确保尽管Shopee亏损，但它不会很快破产。加上$8B现金差额，我的计算估值为$114.7 B，仅比实际估值低$8.4 B。</blockquote></p><p>Then there is Sea&#39;s FinTech arm, SeaMoney. The main product here is a mobile wallet, which was responsible for $4.6B in payment volume in the last quarter (~$20B over a year). This segment accounted for $132 million in Q3 revenue, up a whopping 818% year over year. This implies a &#34;take rate&#34; of 2.9%, which is even better than established FinTech companies like Visa (V). Because of this high take rate, I&#39;m not worried about SeaMoney losing money while it scales.</p><p><blockquote>然后是Sea的金融科技部门SeaMoney。这里的主要产品是移动钱包，上个季度的支付量为46亿美元（一年约为200亿美元）。该部门第三季度收入为1.32亿美元，同比增长818%。这意味着2.9%的“采用率”，甚至比Visa(V)等老牌金融科技公司还要好。由于采用率很高，我并不担心SeaMoney在扩大规模时会亏损。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Despite SeaMoney being a small segment, it&#39;s now reaching a point where it can be factored into the valuation. Maybe it&#39;s only worth a couple of billion, but this is just the start. Five years ago, nobody would have expected that an e-commerce platform accounting for 5% of Sea&#39;s sales would today be worth more than the gaming segment. But Sea&#39;s management - combined with Garena&#39;s ability to fund new segments and drive their viral adoption - made it happen. It&#39;s certainly not guaranteed that Sea will have the same success with FinTech, but there is precedent for it.</p><p><blockquote>尽管SeaMoney只是一个很小的细分市场，但它现在已经达到了可以纳入估值的程度。也许它只值几十亿，但这只是一个开始。五年前，没有人会想到，一个占Sea销售额5%的电子商务平台今天的价值会超过游戏领域。但Sea的管理层——加上Garena为新细分市场提供资金并推动其病毒式采用的能力——实现了这一目标。当然，不能保证Sea在金融科技方面会取得同样的成功，但这是有先例的。</blockquote></p><p>If one day this segment is worth a third or more of Sea (in 2020, FinTech accounted for 36% of MercadoLibre&#39;s revenue) then getting it for just 7% of the business today will be well worth it, even if that implies a somewhat high 16x P/S multiple for the segment today. Actually, this multiple is already lower than Visa&#39;s, Mastercard&#39;s (NYSE:MA), and Affirm&#39;s (NASDAQ:AFRM). Realistically, a segment growing at 818% year over year should probably get a higher multiple than these slower-growing companies&#39;, but we don&#39;t even need to speculate about what a fair multiple is, since we can reach Sea&#39;s current valuation by using 16x P/S in my model valuation.</p><p><blockquote>如果有一天这个细分市场的价值达到Sea的三分之一或更多（2020年，金融科技占MercadoLibre收入的36%），那么今天仅以7%的业务获得它将是非常值得的，即使这意味着今天该细分市场的市盈率为16倍。事实上，这个倍数已经低于Visa、Mastercard（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MA）和Affirm（纳斯达克股票代码：AFRM）。实际上，同比增长818%的细分市场可能应该比这些增长较慢的公司获得更高的市盈率，但我们甚至不需要猜测什么是公平市盈率，因为我们可以通过在我的模型估值中使用16倍市盈率来达到Sea当前的估值。</blockquote></p><p>One way this segment could grow even more is through the introduction of more products besides the mobile wallet. Sea noted in their recent earnings that they have started &#34;early initiatives in other digital financial services such as buy now pay later, digital bank, and insurtech.&#34; These guys sure know how to hop on the latest high growth trend.</p><p><blockquote>这一细分市场进一步增长的一个方法是推出除移动钱包之外的更多产品。Sea在最近的财报中指出，他们已经开始“在其他数字金融服务方面采取早期举措，例如先买后付、数字银行和保险科技”。这些人肯定知道如何抓住最新的高增长趋势。</blockquote></p><p>Finally, there&#39;s the investments arm. Sea is investing in early-stage tech companies, especially in Southeast Asia. There&#39;s strong precedent for companies like Tencent (which is itself an investor in Sea) and Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) managing successful investment portfolios that ultimately factor meaningfully into their valuation. Right now Sea&#39;s investment arm is very early stage, so I don&#39;t include it in my valuation model. But it doesn&#39;t have to be factored in to justify the current share price. It&#39;s just one more area that might be worth a large part of Sea one day.</p><p><blockquote>最后是投资部门。Sea正在投资早期科技公司，尤其是在东南亚。腾讯控股（其本身就是Sea的投资者）和Shopify（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SHOP）等公司管理成功的投资组合，最终对其估值产生有意义的影响，这是有先例的。目前Sea的投资部门还处于早期阶段，因此我没有将其纳入我的估值模型中。但不一定要考虑到这一点来证明当前股价的合理性。这只是又一个有一天可能抵得上一大部分海洋的区域。</blockquote></p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p>Looking at each of Sea&#39;s segments, my valuation model indicates that Sea is fairly valued today. However, my model doesn&#39;t account for the significant optionality of the newer segments. Just like e-commerce did over the last five years, FinTech (and/or investments) could grow to become a very large part of Sea&#39;s business. With the FinTech segment currently growing at 818% year over year, it doesn&#39;t take much imagination to see how this happens. Just another year or two of growth at something close to that rate will make the FinTech arm impossible for investors to ignore.</p><p><blockquote>纵观Sea的每个细分市场，我的估值模型表明Sea目前的估值相当合理。然而，我的模型没有考虑到新细分市场的重要可选性。就像电子商务在过去五年中所做的那样，金融科技（和/或投资）可能会发展成为Sea业务的一个非常重要的部分。金融科技领域目前同比增长818%，不需要太多想象力就能看出这是如何发生的。只要再以接近这一速度增长一两年，投资者就无法忽视金融科技部门。</blockquote></p><p>This optionality combined general strength in each business has allowed Sea to post an average revenue beat of 7% over the past year. Earnings haven&#39;t been as strong, and I expect that to be the main point of contention with my valuation model, as is the case for most unprofitable companies. In particular, I expect some readers will disagree with my valuation of the e-commerce segment. But even if you drop e-commerce all the way down to 5x P/S (a multiple seen today by much slower growing e-commerce companies) that implies 54% downside from today&#39;s prices. It&#39;s a steep drop for sure, but most companies in today&#39;s market would be looking at such a decline if one were to use the most conservative valuation standards possible.</p><p><blockquote>这种选择性结合了每项业务的总体实力，使Sea在过去一年的平均收入增长了7%。盈利并没有那么强劲，我预计这将成为我的估值模型的主要争论点，就像大多数未盈利公司的情况一样。特别是，我预计一些读者会不同意我对电子商务领域的估值。但即使你将电子商务的市盈率一路降至5倍（这是当今增长缓慢得多的电子商务公司的市盈率），这也意味着比今天的价格下跌54%。这肯定是一个急剧的下跌，但如果使用最保守的估值标准，当今市场上的大多数公司都会看到这样的下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Only fast-growing companies like Sea can quickly offset such a decline with revenue growth. As a result, the businesses with the most long-term potential will hardly ever trade at the most conservative valuation possible. And Sea certainly has long-term potential. It&#39;s one of the few high-growth companies I own that I could see reaching a trillion-dollar market cap this decade.</p><p><blockquote>只有像Sea这样快速增长的公司才能用收入增长迅速抵消这种下降。因此，最具长期潜力的企业很难以最保守的估值进行交易。Sea当然具有长期潜力。这是我拥有的少数几家高增长公司之一，我认为这些公司在这十年内市值将达到万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Shares Jumped More Than 4% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨逾4%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Shares Jumped More Than 4% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨逾4%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 23:04</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨超过4%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/448dcc7d589843674730e046aa6ef96a\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>Also Read:</b><b>Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Understand The Recent Selloff</b></p><p><blockquote><b>另请阅读：</b><b>Sea Limited：深入了解最近的抛售</b></blockquote></p><p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Sea Limited is a highly diversified business firing on all cylinders in some of the fastest-growing economies in the world.</li><li>I dive into each of its segments to understand the recent selloff and justify the current valuation.</li><li>I consider Sea one of my ten highest conviction investments.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa5cbe0a30acc723a2c6f62300024002\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Sea Limited是一家高度多元化的企业，在世界上一些增长最快的经济体中全力以赴。</li><li>我深入研究了它的每个细分市场，以了解最近的抛售并证明当前估值的合理性。</li><li>我认为Sea是我最有信心的十项投资之一。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>kokkai/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>论文</b></blockquote></p><p>A by-parts analysis of Sea Limited&#39;s (NYSE:SE) segments shows that its current valuation is roughly fair, but there are many long-term growth drivers that could surprise to the upside and drive very strong returns for years to come.</p><p><blockquote>对Sea Limited（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SE）部门的细分分析表明，其目前的估值大致公平，但有许多长期增长动力可能会出人意料地上涨，并在未来几年推动非常强劲的回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Introduction</b></p><p><blockquote><b>介绍</b></blockquote></p><p>I recently wrote an article highlighting my top 10 stock picks for 2022. I&#39;d already done an in-depth analysis of my other nine picks in other Seeking Alpha articles, so I thought it would be good to close out the year with an article about Sea.</p><p><blockquote>我最近写了一篇文章，重点介绍了我选择的2022年十大股票。我已经在其他Seeking Alpha文章中对我的其他九个选择进行了深入分析，所以我认为最好以一篇关于Sea的文章来结束这一年。</blockquote></p><p>Furthermore, with shares down significantly over the past couple of months (but still slightly up for the year), I believe this article may prove timely. I don&#39;t speculate on short-term market movements, but I personally added to my Sea shares recently. It&#39;s one of my only losing positions that I didn&#39;t sell out of temporarily for tax-loss harvesting, and in this article, I will explain why Sea is such a high conviction holding for me.</p><p><blockquote>此外，由于过去几个月股价大幅下跌（但今年仍略有上涨），我相信这篇文章可能是及时的。我不推测短期市场走势，但我个人最近增持了Sea股票。这是我唯一没有为了收获税收损失而暂时卖出的亏损头寸之一，在本文中，我将解释为什么Sea对我来说是如此坚定的持有。</blockquote></p><p>It&#39;s also worth noting that many professional investors seem to share this opinion. Sea is the 121st largest company in the world, but it&#39;s the16thmost popular holding among hedge funds. This implies that big money is overweight Sea, with 71% of shares held by institutions.</p><p><blockquote>还值得注意的是，许多专业投资者似乎也认同这一观点。Sea是全球第121大公司，但在对冲基金中排名第16位。这暗示大资金是跑赢大盘海，71%的股份被机构持有。</blockquote></p><p>Because Sea operates in many different areas, I will do a separate analysis of each of its operating segments to justify its current valuation and explain how that valuation could drive unexpectedly strong returns for years.</p><p><blockquote>由于Sea在许多不同的领域开展业务，我将对其每个运营部门进行单独分析，以证明其当前估值的合理性，并解释该估值如何在多年来推动意想不到的强劲回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gaming</b></p><p><blockquote><b>游戏</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea Limited&#39;s gaming segment Garena is best known for Free Fire, a mobile battle royale game that was developed in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Sea Limited的游戏部门Garena因其内部开发的移动大逃杀游戏《Free Fire》而闻名。</blockquote></p><p>The game was released in 2017 and has been very popular ever since. It currently has the second most monthly active users among all Android games globally. The game is available worldwide, but it&#39;s particularly popular in emerging markets like SEA, LATAM, and India, where it&#39;s been the highest-grossing mobile game for over two years.</p><p><blockquote>该游戏于2017年发布，此后一直非常受欢迎。它目前在全球所有安卓游戏中拥有第二大月活跃用户。这款游戏在全球范围内都有售，但在东南亚、拉美和印度等新兴市场尤其受欢迎，两年多来，它一直是这些市场票房最高的手机游戏。</blockquote></p><p>With the game having been popular for a long time already, there&#39;s some concern that gamers will move on to the next big thing. Although there are some mobile games that are older than Free Fire and still very popular - like Roblox, Clash of Clans, and Pokemon Go - there are many more that have been forgotten. Until Garena releases more games and proves that it can be successful with them too, there will always be questions about whether its studio is a one-hit wonder.</p><p><blockquote>随着这款游戏已经流行了很长时间，有人担心游戏玩家会转向下一件大事。虽然有一些手机游戏比Free Fire更古老，但仍然非常受欢迎——如Roblox、Clash of Clans和Pokemon Go——但还有更多已经被遗忘。在Garena发布更多游戏并证明它也可以在这些游戏上取得成功之前，总会有人质疑它的工作室是否是一个昙花一现的奇迹。</blockquote></p><p>Regardless, Garena is a critical part of Sea because it&#39;s the only profitable segment and it doubles a social platform that provides free advertising for Sea&#39;s non-gaming products. Cross-promotion is a huge competitive advantage for Sea.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，Garena是Sea的重要组成部分，因为它是唯一盈利的细分市场，并且它是为Sea非游戏产品提供免费广告的社交平台的两倍。交叉推广是Sea的巨大竞争优势。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, one reason for Sea&#39;s recent selloff could be the Q4 guidance implied for Garena.</p><p><blockquote>因此，Sea最近抛售的原因之一可能是Garena暗示的第四季度指引。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e299727cc28a887a36d88831aec8f53\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"334\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Earnings Call Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：看涨期权收益演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>In Q2 this year, Garena raised its guidance to $4.5B-$4.7B for 2021 bookings (up from $4.3B-$4.5B). With the first three quarters already totaling $3.5B, this implies that Q4 bookings will come in at $1.0B-$1.2B, up between 0% and 20% year over year, and likely down sequentially. This is compared to 29% growth in the most recent quarter and 44% projected growth for the full year.</p><p><blockquote>今年第二季度，Garena将2021年预订量的指导上调至45亿美元至47亿美元（高于43亿美元至45亿美元）。由于前三个季度的总预订量已经达到$3.5 B，这意味着第四季度的预订量将达到$1.0 B-$1.2 B，同比增长0%至20%，并且可能会环比下降。相比之下，最近一个季度的增长率为29%，全年预计增长率为44%。</blockquote></p><p>While 20% isn&#39;t a terrible deceleration, 0% certainly is. Even 20% growth isn&#39;t spectacular compared to the historic levels. At the 10% midpoint, Garena&#39;s growth looks more similar to that of a mature company like Activision (NASDAQ:ATVI) or Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) than a fast-growing company like Roblox (NYSE:RBLX).</p><p><blockquote>虽然20%并不是一个可怕的减速，但0%肯定是。与历史水平相比，即使是20%的增长也并不引人注目。在10%的中点，Garena的增长看起来更类似于动视暴雪（纳斯达克股票代码：ATVI）或Zynga（纳斯达克股票代码：ZNGA）等成熟公司，而不是Roblox（纽约证券交易所股票代码：RBLX）等快速增长的公司。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Garena&#39;s implied valuation should - and did - suffer as a result. While a fast-growing company like Roblox can command a high double-digit P/S multiple, Activision and Zynga trade at an average P/S multiple of just 4. Garena is slightly more profitable than them and probably has more risk to the upside, so I&#39;ll use a P/S multiple of 5 for my implied valuation. This implies a P/E of about 10 for a business growing at around 10%, which is very reasonable in today&#39;s market.</p><p><blockquote>Garena的隐含估值应该——也确实——因此受到影响。虽然像Roblox这样快速增长的公司可以获得两位数的高市盈率，但动视暴雪和Zynga的平均市盈率仅为4倍。Garena的利润比他们略高，而且可能有更大的上行风险，因此我将使用市盈率倍数5作为我的隐含估值。这意味着一家增长率在10%左右的企业的市盈率约为10，这在当今市场上是非常合理的。</blockquote></p><p>This means Garena is worth $23.5B based on the high end of management&#39;s guidance.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着根据管理层指导的高端，Garena的价值为235亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>I believe this valuation is actually conservative for a few reasons:</p><p><blockquote>我相信这个估值实际上是保守的，原因有几个：</blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Next year has tough comps and growth could re-accelerate in the following years or even next year, especially if Garena releases a new hit game. The growth rate past next quarter is not based on explicit guidance from the company, only industry forecasts.</li><li>The peer valuations I used are from companies also trading at the lower end of their valuation range for the past year.</li><li>Garena has a good track record and is continuing to invest in Free Fire. One example of this is the recently released Free Fire MAX, which improves the experience for users with higher-end phones and even adds a metaverse-like customizable map called Craftland. To me, this implies that Garena believes Free Fire is still in the earlier part of its lifecycle.</li><li>Although I&#39;d obviously prefer that Garena develops more games in house, in the meantime it&#39;s still not a one-trick pony. In addition to Free Fire, Garena distributes games from third-party developers like Tencent (OTCMKTS:OTCPK:TCEHY). These are popular titles like League of Legends and Call of Duty, which meaningfully diversify Garena&#39;s revenue.</li></ul><b>E-Commerce</b></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>明年的竞争很艰难，增长可能会在接下来的几年甚至明年重新加速，特别是如果Garena发布一款新的热门游戏。下个季度的增长率不是基于公司的明确指导，而是基于行业预测。</li><li>我使用的同行估值来自去年交易价格也处于估值范围下限的公司。</li><li>Garena拥有良好的业绩记录，并将继续投资Free Fire。这方面的一个例子是最近发布的Free Fire MAX，它改善了高端手机用户的体验，甚至添加了一个类似元宇宙的可定制地图，称为Craftland。对我来说，这意味着Garena认为Free Fire仍处于其生命周期的早期阶段。</li><li>虽然我显然更希望Garena在内部开发更多的游戏，但与此同时，它仍然不是一匹只会一招的小马。除了Free Fire之外，Garena还发行腾讯控股(OTCMKTS：OTCPK：TCEHY)等第三方开发商的游戏。这些都是像《英雄联盟》和《使命看涨期权》这样受欢迎的游戏，它们有意义地使Garena的收入多样化。</li></ul><b>电子商务</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea&#39;s e-commerce platform Shopee is currently its big growth driver. This platform is often considered the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) of Southeast Asia, and it recently expanded into more markets including Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>Sea的电子商务平台Shopee目前是其最大的增长动力。该平台通常被认为是东南亚的亚马逊（纳斯达克：AMZN），最近它扩展到包括巴西在内的更多市场。</blockquote></p><p>There&#39;s always some debate about who is really the Amazon of a region. Shopee certainly has competition, including from Alibaba&#39;s (NYSE:BABA) Lazada, Tokopedia in Indonesia, MercadoLibre (MELI) in Brazil, and even Amazon itself. With most of the competition being private or tucked away into a larger company, many of the competitors don&#39;t publish exact revenue numbers, which makes it difficult to measure the competition. Even Sea hasn&#39;t published explicit revenue numbers for some countries like Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>关于谁是一个地区真正的亚马逊，总是有一些争论。Shopee当然面临竞争，包括来自阿里巴巴-SW(NYSE：BABA)的Lazada、印尼的Tokopedia、巴西的MercadoLibre(MELI)，甚至Amazon本身。由于大多数竞争都是私人的或隐藏在更大的公司中，许多竞争对手不会公布确切的收入数字，这使得衡量竞争变得困难。就连Sea也没有公布巴西等一些国家的明确收入数据。</blockquote></p><p>One neutral source that can be assessed is the Alexa site rank, which as its name suggests ranks sites by their popularity. Keep in mind that these are ranks, so a lower score is better.</p><p><blockquote>一个可以评估的中立来源是Alexa网站排名，顾名思义，它根据网站的受欢迎程度对网站进行排名。请记住，这些都是排名，所以分数越低越好。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/180367a2b64bccebf243c5b6d8fb776a\" tg-width=\"455\" tg-height=\"353\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from Alexa</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自Alexa</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shopee is very mobile-focused, but the above table only considers the website. To check App Store app ranks for the shopping category, we can use App Annie.</p><p><blockquote>Shopee非常专注于移动，但上表只考虑了网站。要查看购物类别的App Store应用排名，我们可以使用App Annie。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6544f014a5d70d13ee14dab0ac8b6782\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"403\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from AppAnnie</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自AppAnnie</span></p></blockquote></p><p>On the mobile side, there&#39;s no need to look at the competition because Shopee is consistently the number one shopping app in every country listed. In a mobile-first world, this bodes very well. Even on the web side, Shopee wins out except in a few specific regions like LATAM and (barely) Indonesia, which have more local competitors.</p><p><blockquote>在移动端，没有必要关注竞争，因为Shopee一直是每个国家排名第一的购物应用。在移动优先的世界里，这是个好兆头。即使在网络方面，Shopee也胜出，除了拉丁美洲和（勉强）印度尼西亚等少数特定地区，这些地区有更多的本地竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p>Of course, traffic doesn&#39;t always translate to GMV. But for a shopping app where most people will use the app to buy something, it&#39;s a decent proxy. A third party estimates that Shopee accounts for57%of all e-commerce in Southeast Asia. It&#39;s Shopee&#39;s dominance in the mobile app ranks and market share that make me consider it the Amazon of Southeast Asia.</p><p><blockquote>当然，流量并不总是转化为GMV。但对于一个大多数人都会使用该应用程序购买东西的购物应用程序来说，这是一个不错的代理。第三方估计Shopee占东南亚所有电子商务的57%。正是Shopee在移动应用排名和市场份额方面的主导地位让我认为它是东南亚的亚马逊。</blockquote></p><p>So why would a company with so much potential sell off?</p><p><blockquote>那么，为什么一家潜力如此之大的公司会抛售呢？</blockquote></p><p>After the recent earnings report, some analysts expressed concern that Shopee is branching out into other countries like Poland and Mexico before validating its business model in the current markets. In these countries, Shopee has less of a presence; it&#39;s bounced between the 3-5 spots on the Mexico App Store for shopping apps, and between spots 1 and 3 in Poland. Although analysts hate uncertainty - and the CEO&#39;s comments that they don&#39;t have a concrete measure of success in these earlier stage countries won&#39;t help with that - Shopee has a history of entering new countries successfully and I am willing to give management some time to try expanding more. After all, if they&#39;re successful, then it could drive even more unexpected growth in the future.</p><p><blockquote>在最近的财报发布后，一些分析师对Shopee在当前市场验证其商业模式之前将业务扩展到波兰和墨西哥等其他国家表示担忧。在这些国家，Shopee的影响力较小；它在墨西哥应用商店购物应用的3-5位之间波动，在波兰的1-3位之间波动。尽管分析师讨厌不确定性——而且首席执行官关于他们在这些早期国家没有具体的成功衡量标准的评论对此没有帮助——但Shopee有着成功进入新国家的历史，我愿意给管理层一些时间尝试进一步扩张。毕竟，如果他们成功了，那么它可能会在未来推动更多意想不到的增长。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Another complaint from analysts was that the basket size (average purchase size) is trending down. While that could also have contributed to the recent selloff, it&#39;s hard to complain when the overall sales increased a lot despite a decrease in basket size.</p><p><blockquote>分析师的另一个抱怨是篮子规模（平均购买规模）呈下降趋势。虽然这也可能导致了最近的抛售，但尽管篮子规模有所下降，但当整体销售额大幅增长时，很难抱怨。</blockquote></p><p>The company raised its guidance for e-commerce again in Q3, now guiding for $5.0B-$5.2B in 2021 e-commerce revenue. That&#39;s 75%-100% growth in Q4 and about 135% growth for the year. These are much more exciting numbers than the gaming side, although the guidance still implies a slight deceleration in Q4. But compared to Amazon&#39;s $340B in 2020 e-commerce sales, Shopee looks like it&#39;s just scratched the surface. E-commerce is at only11%penetration in Southeast Asia compared to18.7%in the USA, and Southeast Asia economies are generally growing faster than the USA&#39;s.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在第三季度再次上调了电子商务指引，目前预计2021年电子商务收入为$5.0 B-$5.2 B。第四季度增长75%-100%，全年增长约135%。这些数字比游戏方面更令人兴奋，尽管指导仍然意味着第四季度略有减速。但与亚马逊2020年3400亿美元的电子商务销售额相比，Shopee看起来只是触及了表面。电子商务在东南亚的渗透率仅为11%，而美国为18.7%，东南亚经济体的增长速度普遍高于美国。</blockquote></p><p>Despite being in a blue skies industry, it&#39;s more difficult to value the e-commerce segment because it operates at a loss (whereas the gaming segment is highly profitable). Shopee&#39;s success is not guaranteed because it&#39;s not clear at this point whether the platform can become profitable while retaining its market share. Stocks like this tend to experience more volatility, which could partially explain the recent selloff.</p><p><blockquote>尽管处于蓝天行业，但对电子商务部门进行估值更加困难，因为它处于亏损状态（而游戏部门利润丰厚）。Shopee的成功并不能保证，因为目前尚不清楚该平台能否在保持市场份额的同时实现盈利。像这样的股票往往会经历更大的波动，这可以部分解释最近的抛售。</blockquote></p><p>For unprofitable software companies, I like to use the Rule of 40 to assess the business. But it&#39;s difficult to apply this rule to a more cyclical e-commerce company with naturally lower margins. Even so, it&#39;s worth noting that despite being unprofitable, Sea&#39;s Rule of 40 score of 104 is better than most SaaS companies&#39;, and also better than e-commerce peers Amazon (21), MercadoLibre (73), and Alibaba (43).</p><p><blockquote>对于不盈利的软件公司，我喜欢用40法则来评估业务。但很难将这一规则应用于利润率自然较低、周期性较强的电子商务公司。即便如此，值得注意的是，尽管没有盈利，Sea的40分（104分）优于大多数SaaS公司，也优于电子商务同行Amazon（21分）、MercadoLibre（73分）和阿里巴巴-SW（43分）。</blockquote></p><p>To understand Shopee&#39;s terminal valuation once it becomes profitable, we can look at industry peers. Amazon is one profitable and slower-growing peer, and it trades at 4x P/S. AWS pushes this number up, but Amazon&#39;s high exposure to first-party sales offsets that. Other e-commerce marketplace peers trade at similar valuations: Alibaba at 3x P/S, MercadoLibre at 9x P/S. All of these valuations are basically all-time lows.</p><p><blockquote>要了解Shopee盈利后的终端估值，我们可以看看行业同行。亚马逊是一家盈利且增长较慢的同行，其市盈率为4倍。AWS推高了这一数字，但亚马逊对第一方销售的高敞口抵消了这一影响。其他电子商务市场同行的估值类似：阿里巴巴-SW的市盈率为3倍，MercadoLibre的市盈率为9倍。所有这些估值基本上都是历史低点。</blockquote></p><p>If Shopee keeps doubling revenue over the next couple of years (which it&#39;s easily done every year since 2016), becomes profitable (which scaling up tends to help with), and will have Amazon&#39;s P/S multiple in two years, then at 16 P/S today it would trade flat for two years. But if it keeps growing much faster than Amazon over a longer period like a decade, and/or if the overall industry multiples expand to more normal historical levels, then even at 16x P/S this segment has potential upside. On the other hand, if it stops growing or never becomes profitable then investors will be very disappointed at any P/S.</p><p><blockquote>如果Shopee在未来几年内收入持续翻倍（自2016年以来每年都很容易做到），实现盈利（扩大规模往往会有所帮助），并在两年内达到亚马逊的市盈率倍数，那么今天的市盈率为16倍，它将在两年内持平。但如果它在十年等较长时间内保持比亚马逊快得多的增长速度，和/或如果整个行业市盈率扩大到更正常的历史水平，那么即使市盈率为16倍，该细分市场也有潜在的上涨空间。另一方面，如果它停止增长或永远无法盈利，那么投资者将对任何市盈率感到非常失望。</blockquote></p><p>Given this wide range of outcomes, each person is going to have their own way of valuing this segment. For me, when I look at Shopee&#39;s mobile dominance, relatively small current size, the funding coming in from Garena, and the precedent set by Amazon, Alibaba, and MercadoLibre for the sustainable long-term success of this business model, I am optimistic about this segment&#39;s future. I recognize that it&#39;s currently an unprofitable and thus risky segment, but I also see the massive potential.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这种广泛的结果，每个人都会有自己的方式来评估这一部分。对我来说，当我看到Shopee的移动主导地位、目前相对较小的规模、来自Garena的资金以及Amazon、阿里巴巴-SW和MercadoLibre为这种商业模式的可持续长期成功树立的先例时，我对这个细分市场的未来持乐观态度。我认识到这是一个目前无利可图且存在风险的细分市场，但我也看到了巨大的潜力。</blockquote></p><p>So I am happy paying a 16x P/S multiple, which values the e-commerce segment at $83.2B. Some people will call that way too high, and those people will probably never get a chance to invest in this company, for better or for worse.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我很高兴支付16倍的市盈率，这使得电子商务部门的估值为$832亿。有些人的看涨期权太高，这些人可能永远没有机会投资这家公司，无论好坏。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, with just Garena and Shopee, I have Sea being worth $106.7B. Its current market cap is $123.1B. To account for the difference, let&#39;s look at the other parts of Sea.</p><p><blockquote>因此，仅算上Garena和Shopee，我认为Sea的价值为$1067亿。其目前的市值为$123.1 B。为了解释这种差异，让我们看看海洋的其他部分。</blockquote></p><p><b>FinTech &amp; Investments</b></p><p><blockquote><b>金融科技与投资</b></blockquote></p><p>The easiest addition to my computed valuation is Sea&#39;s $12B cash pile, partially offset by $4B in debt. This adds some nice optionality to the company and ensures that it won&#39;t be bankrupt any time soon despite losing money with Shopee. Adding in the $8B cash difference puts my computed valuation at $114.7B, just $8.4B short of the actual valuation.</p><p><blockquote>我计算的估值中最容易增加的是Sea的120B美元现金储备，部分被40亿美元的债务抵消。这为该公司增加了一些不错的选择，并确保尽管Shopee亏损，但它不会很快破产。加上$8B现金差额，我的计算估值为$114.7 B，仅比实际估值低$8.4 B。</blockquote></p><p>Then there is Sea&#39;s FinTech arm, SeaMoney. The main product here is a mobile wallet, which was responsible for $4.6B in payment volume in the last quarter (~$20B over a year). This segment accounted for $132 million in Q3 revenue, up a whopping 818% year over year. This implies a &#34;take rate&#34; of 2.9%, which is even better than established FinTech companies like Visa (V). Because of this high take rate, I&#39;m not worried about SeaMoney losing money while it scales.</p><p><blockquote>然后是Sea的金融科技部门SeaMoney。这里的主要产品是移动钱包，上个季度的支付量为46亿美元（一年约为200亿美元）。该部门第三季度收入为1.32亿美元，同比增长818%。这意味着2.9%的“采用率”，甚至比Visa(V)等老牌金融科技公司还要好。由于采用率很高，我并不担心SeaMoney在扩大规模时会亏损。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Despite SeaMoney being a small segment, it&#39;s now reaching a point where it can be factored into the valuation. Maybe it&#39;s only worth a couple of billion, but this is just the start. Five years ago, nobody would have expected that an e-commerce platform accounting for 5% of Sea&#39;s sales would today be worth more than the gaming segment. But Sea&#39;s management - combined with Garena&#39;s ability to fund new segments and drive their viral adoption - made it happen. It&#39;s certainly not guaranteed that Sea will have the same success with FinTech, but there is precedent for it.</p><p><blockquote>尽管SeaMoney只是一个很小的细分市场，但它现在已经达到了可以纳入估值的程度。也许它只值几十亿，但这只是一个开始。五年前，没有人会想到，一个占Sea销售额5%的电子商务平台今天的价值会超过游戏领域。但Sea的管理层——加上Garena为新细分市场提供资金并推动其病毒式采用的能力——实现了这一目标。当然，不能保证Sea在金融科技方面会取得同样的成功，但这是有先例的。</blockquote></p><p>If one day this segment is worth a third or more of Sea (in 2020, FinTech accounted for 36% of MercadoLibre&#39;s revenue) then getting it for just 7% of the business today will be well worth it, even if that implies a somewhat high 16x P/S multiple for the segment today. Actually, this multiple is already lower than Visa&#39;s, Mastercard&#39;s (NYSE:MA), and Affirm&#39;s (NASDAQ:AFRM). Realistically, a segment growing at 818% year over year should probably get a higher multiple than these slower-growing companies&#39;, but we don&#39;t even need to speculate about what a fair multiple is, since we can reach Sea&#39;s current valuation by using 16x P/S in my model valuation.</p><p><blockquote>如果有一天这个细分市场的价值达到Sea的三分之一或更多（2020年，金融科技占MercadoLibre收入的36%），那么今天仅以7%的业务获得它将是非常值得的，即使这意味着今天该细分市场的市盈率为16倍。事实上，这个倍数已经低于Visa、Mastercard（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MA）和Affirm（纳斯达克股票代码：AFRM）。实际上，同比增长818%的细分市场可能应该比这些增长较慢的公司获得更高的市盈率，但我们甚至不需要猜测什么是公平市盈率，因为我们可以通过在我的模型估值中使用16倍市盈率来达到Sea当前的估值。</blockquote></p><p>One way this segment could grow even more is through the introduction of more products besides the mobile wallet. Sea noted in their recent earnings that they have started &#34;early initiatives in other digital financial services such as buy now pay later, digital bank, and insurtech.&#34; These guys sure know how to hop on the latest high growth trend.</p><p><blockquote>这一细分市场进一步增长的一个方法是推出除移动钱包之外的更多产品。Sea在最近的财报中指出，他们已经开始“在其他数字金融服务方面采取早期举措，例如先买后付、数字银行和保险科技”。这些人肯定知道如何抓住最新的高增长趋势。</blockquote></p><p>Finally, there&#39;s the investments arm. Sea is investing in early-stage tech companies, especially in Southeast Asia. There&#39;s strong precedent for companies like Tencent (which is itself an investor in Sea) and Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) managing successful investment portfolios that ultimately factor meaningfully into their valuation. Right now Sea&#39;s investment arm is very early stage, so I don&#39;t include it in my valuation model. But it doesn&#39;t have to be factored in to justify the current share price. It&#39;s just one more area that might be worth a large part of Sea one day.</p><p><blockquote>最后是投资部门。Sea正在投资早期科技公司，尤其是在东南亚。腾讯控股（其本身就是Sea的投资者）和Shopify（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SHOP）等公司管理成功的投资组合，最终对其估值产生有意义的影响，这是有先例的。目前Sea的投资部门还处于早期阶段，因此我没有将其纳入我的估值模型中。但不一定要考虑到这一点来证明当前股价的合理性。这只是又一个有一天可能抵得上一大部分海洋的区域。</blockquote></p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p>Looking at each of Sea&#39;s segments, my valuation model indicates that Sea is fairly valued today. However, my model doesn&#39;t account for the significant optionality of the newer segments. Just like e-commerce did over the last five years, FinTech (and/or investments) could grow to become a very large part of Sea&#39;s business. With the FinTech segment currently growing at 818% year over year, it doesn&#39;t take much imagination to see how this happens. Just another year or two of growth at something close to that rate will make the FinTech arm impossible for investors to ignore.</p><p><blockquote>纵观Sea的每个细分市场，我的估值模型表明Sea目前的估值相当合理。然而，我的模型没有考虑到新细分市场的重要可选性。就像电子商务在过去五年中所做的那样，金融科技（和/或投资）可能会发展成为Sea业务的一个非常重要的部分。金融科技领域目前同比增长818%，不需要太多想象力就能看出这是如何发生的。只要再以接近这一速度增长一两年，投资者就无法忽视金融科技部门。</blockquote></p><p>This optionality combined general strength in each business has allowed Sea to post an average revenue beat of 7% over the past year. Earnings haven&#39;t been as strong, and I expect that to be the main point of contention with my valuation model, as is the case for most unprofitable companies. In particular, I expect some readers will disagree with my valuation of the e-commerce segment. But even if you drop e-commerce all the way down to 5x P/S (a multiple seen today by much slower growing e-commerce companies) that implies 54% downside from today&#39;s prices. It&#39;s a steep drop for sure, but most companies in today&#39;s market would be looking at such a decline if one were to use the most conservative valuation standards possible.</p><p><blockquote>这种选择性结合了每项业务的总体实力，使Sea在过去一年的平均收入增长了7%。盈利并没有那么强劲，我预计这将成为我的估值模型的主要争论点，就像大多数未盈利公司的情况一样。特别是，我预计一些读者会不同意我对电子商务领域的估值。但即使你将电子商务的市盈率一路降至5倍（这是当今增长缓慢得多的电子商务公司的市盈率），这也意味着比今天的价格下跌54%。这肯定是一个急剧的下跌，但如果使用最保守的估值标准，当今市场上的大多数公司都会看到这样的下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Only fast-growing companies like Sea can quickly offset such a decline with revenue growth. As a result, the businesses with the most long-term potential will hardly ever trade at the most conservative valuation possible. And Sea certainly has long-term potential. It&#39;s one of the few high-growth companies I own that I could see reaching a trillion-dollar market cap this decade.</p><p><blockquote>只有像Sea这样快速增长的公司才能用收入增长迅速抵消这种下降。因此，最具长期潜力的企业很难以最保守的估值进行交易。Sea当然具有长期潜力。这是我拥有的少数几家高增长公司之一，我认为这些公司在这十年内市值将达到万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106092668","content_text":"Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.Also Read:Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Understand The Recent SelloffSummarySea Limited is a highly diversified business firing on all cylinders in some of the fastest-growing economies in the world.I dive into each of its segments to understand the recent selloff and justify the current valuation.I consider Sea one of my ten highest conviction investments.kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty ImagesThesisA by-parts analysis of Sea Limited's (NYSE:SE) segments shows that its current valuation is roughly fair, but there are many long-term growth drivers that could surprise to the upside and drive very strong returns for years to come.IntroductionI recently wrote an article highlighting my top 10 stock picks for 2022. I'd already done an in-depth analysis of my other nine picks in other Seeking Alpha articles, so I thought it would be good to close out the year with an article about Sea.Furthermore, with shares down significantly over the past couple of months (but still slightly up for the year), I believe this article may prove timely. I don't speculate on short-term market movements, but I personally added to my Sea shares recently. It's one of my only losing positions that I didn't sell out of temporarily for tax-loss harvesting, and in this article, I will explain why Sea is such a high conviction holding for me.It's also worth noting that many professional investors seem to share this opinion. Sea is the 121st largest company in the world, but it's the16thmost popular holding among hedge funds. This implies that big money is overweight Sea, with 71% of shares held by institutions.Because Sea operates in many different areas, I will do a separate analysis of each of its operating segments to justify its current valuation and explain how that valuation could drive unexpectedly strong returns for years.GamingSea Limited's gaming segment Garena is best known for Free Fire, a mobile battle royale game that was developed in-house.The game was released in 2017 and has been very popular ever since. It currently has the second most monthly active users among all Android games globally. The game is available worldwide, but it's particularly popular in emerging markets like SEA, LATAM, and India, where it's been the highest-grossing mobile game for over two years.With the game having been popular for a long time already, there's some concern that gamers will move on to the next big thing. Although there are some mobile games that are older than Free Fire and still very popular - like Roblox, Clash of Clans, and Pokemon Go - there are many more that have been forgotten. Until Garena releases more games and proves that it can be successful with them too, there will always be questions about whether its studio is a one-hit wonder.Regardless, Garena is a critical part of Sea because it's the only profitable segment and it doubles a social platform that provides free advertising for Sea's non-gaming products. Cross-promotion is a huge competitive advantage for Sea.Thus, one reason for Sea's recent selloff could be the Q4 guidance implied for Garena.Source: Earnings Call PresentationIn Q2 this year, Garena raised its guidance to $4.5B-$4.7B for 2021 bookings (up from $4.3B-$4.5B). With the first three quarters already totaling $3.5B, this implies that Q4 bookings will come in at $1.0B-$1.2B, up between 0% and 20% year over year, and likely down sequentially. This is compared to 29% growth in the most recent quarter and 44% projected growth for the full year.While 20% isn't a terrible deceleration, 0% certainly is. Even 20% growth isn't spectacular compared to the historic levels. At the 10% midpoint, Garena's growth looks more similar to that of a mature company like Activision (NASDAQ:ATVI) or Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) than a fast-growing company like Roblox (NYSE:RBLX).Garena's implied valuation should - and did - suffer as a result. While a fast-growing company like Roblox can command a high double-digit P/S multiple, Activision and Zynga trade at an average P/S multiple of just 4. Garena is slightly more profitable than them and probably has more risk to the upside, so I'll use a P/S multiple of 5 for my implied valuation. This implies a P/E of about 10 for a business growing at around 10%, which is very reasonable in today's market.This means Garena is worth $23.5B based on the high end of management's guidance.I believe this valuation is actually conservative for a few reasons:Next year has tough comps and growth could re-accelerate in the following years or even next year, especially if Garena releases a new hit game. The growth rate past next quarter is not based on explicit guidance from the company, only industry forecasts.The peer valuations I used are from companies also trading at the lower end of their valuation range for the past year.Garena has a good track record and is continuing to invest in Free Fire. One example of this is the recently released Free Fire MAX, which improves the experience for users with higher-end phones and even adds a metaverse-like customizable map called Craftland. To me, this implies that Garena believes Free Fire is still in the earlier part of its lifecycle.Although I'd obviously prefer that Garena develops more games in house, in the meantime it's still not a one-trick pony. In addition to Free Fire, Garena distributes games from third-party developers like Tencent (OTCMKTS:OTCPK:TCEHY). These are popular titles like League of Legends and Call of Duty, which meaningfully diversify Garena's revenue.E-CommerceSea's e-commerce platform Shopee is currently its big growth driver. This platform is often considered the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) of Southeast Asia, and it recently expanded into more markets including Brazil.There's always some debate about who is really the Amazon of a region. Shopee certainly has competition, including from Alibaba's (NYSE:BABA) Lazada, Tokopedia in Indonesia, MercadoLibre (MELI) in Brazil, and even Amazon itself. With most of the competition being private or tucked away into a larger company, many of the competitors don't publish exact revenue numbers, which makes it difficult to measure the competition. Even Sea hasn't published explicit revenue numbers for some countries like Brazil.One neutral source that can be assessed is the Alexa site rank, which as its name suggests ranks sites by their popularity. Keep in mind that these are ranks, so a lower score is better.Source: The Author, compiled from AlexaShopee is very mobile-focused, but the above table only considers the website. To check App Store app ranks for the shopping category, we can use App Annie.Source: The Author, compiled from AppAnnieOn the mobile side, there's no need to look at the competition because Shopee is consistently the number one shopping app in every country listed. In a mobile-first world, this bodes very well. Even on the web side, Shopee wins out except in a few specific regions like LATAM and (barely) Indonesia, which have more local competitors.Of course, traffic doesn't always translate to GMV. But for a shopping app where most people will use the app to buy something, it's a decent proxy. A third party estimates that Shopee accounts for57%of all e-commerce in Southeast Asia. It's Shopee's dominance in the mobile app ranks and market share that make me consider it the Amazon of Southeast Asia.So why would a company with so much potential sell off?After the recent earnings report, some analysts expressed concern that Shopee is branching out into other countries like Poland and Mexico before validating its business model in the current markets. In these countries, Shopee has less of a presence; it's bounced between the 3-5 spots on the Mexico App Store for shopping apps, and between spots 1 and 3 in Poland. Although analysts hate uncertainty - and the CEO's comments that they don't have a concrete measure of success in these earlier stage countries won't help with that - Shopee has a history of entering new countries successfully and I am willing to give management some time to try expanding more. After all, if they're successful, then it could drive even more unexpected growth in the future.Another complaint from analysts was that the basket size (average purchase size) is trending down. While that could also have contributed to the recent selloff, it's hard to complain when the overall sales increased a lot despite a decrease in basket size.The company raised its guidance for e-commerce again in Q3, now guiding for $5.0B-$5.2B in 2021 e-commerce revenue. That's 75%-100% growth in Q4 and about 135% growth for the year. These are much more exciting numbers than the gaming side, although the guidance still implies a slight deceleration in Q4. But compared to Amazon's $340B in 2020 e-commerce sales, Shopee looks like it's just scratched the surface. E-commerce is at only11%penetration in Southeast Asia compared to18.7%in the USA, and Southeast Asia economies are generally growing faster than the USA's.Despite being in a blue skies industry, it's more difficult to value the e-commerce segment because it operates at a loss (whereas the gaming segment is highly profitable). Shopee's success is not guaranteed because it's not clear at this point whether the platform can become profitable while retaining its market share. Stocks like this tend to experience more volatility, which could partially explain the recent selloff.For unprofitable software companies, I like to use the Rule of 40 to assess the business. But it's difficult to apply this rule to a more cyclical e-commerce company with naturally lower margins. Even so, it's worth noting that despite being unprofitable, Sea's Rule of 40 score of 104 is better than most SaaS companies', and also better than e-commerce peers Amazon (21), MercadoLibre (73), and Alibaba (43).To understand Shopee's terminal valuation once it becomes profitable, we can look at industry peers. Amazon is one profitable and slower-growing peer, and it trades at 4x P/S. AWS pushes this number up, but Amazon's high exposure to first-party sales offsets that. Other e-commerce marketplace peers trade at similar valuations: Alibaba at 3x P/S, MercadoLibre at 9x P/S. All of these valuations are basically all-time lows.If Shopee keeps doubling revenue over the next couple of years (which it's easily done every year since 2016), becomes profitable (which scaling up tends to help with), and will have Amazon's P/S multiple in two years, then at 16 P/S today it would trade flat for two years. But if it keeps growing much faster than Amazon over a longer period like a decade, and/or if the overall industry multiples expand to more normal historical levels, then even at 16x P/S this segment has potential upside. On the other hand, if it stops growing or never becomes profitable then investors will be very disappointed at any P/S.Given this wide range of outcomes, each person is going to have their own way of valuing this segment. For me, when I look at Shopee's mobile dominance, relatively small current size, the funding coming in from Garena, and the precedent set by Amazon, Alibaba, and MercadoLibre for the sustainable long-term success of this business model, I am optimistic about this segment's future. I recognize that it's currently an unprofitable and thus risky segment, but I also see the massive potential.So I am happy paying a 16x P/S multiple, which values the e-commerce segment at $83.2B. Some people will call that way too high, and those people will probably never get a chance to invest in this company, for better or for worse.Thus, with just Garena and Shopee, I have Sea being worth $106.7B. Its current market cap is $123.1B. To account for the difference, let's look at the other parts of Sea.FinTech & InvestmentsThe easiest addition to my computed valuation is Sea's $12B cash pile, partially offset by $4B in debt. This adds some nice optionality to the company and ensures that it won't be bankrupt any time soon despite losing money with Shopee. Adding in the $8B cash difference puts my computed valuation at $114.7B, just $8.4B short of the actual valuation.Then there is Sea's FinTech arm, SeaMoney. The main product here is a mobile wallet, which was responsible for $4.6B in payment volume in the last quarter (~$20B over a year). This segment accounted for $132 million in Q3 revenue, up a whopping 818% year over year. This implies a \"take rate\" of 2.9%, which is even better than established FinTech companies like Visa (V). Because of this high take rate, I'm not worried about SeaMoney losing money while it scales.Despite SeaMoney being a small segment, it's now reaching a point where it can be factored into the valuation. Maybe it's only worth a couple of billion, but this is just the start. Five years ago, nobody would have expected that an e-commerce platform accounting for 5% of Sea's sales would today be worth more than the gaming segment. But Sea's management - combined with Garena's ability to fund new segments and drive their viral adoption - made it happen. It's certainly not guaranteed that Sea will have the same success with FinTech, but there is precedent for it.If one day this segment is worth a third or more of Sea (in 2020, FinTech accounted for 36% of MercadoLibre's revenue) then getting it for just 7% of the business today will be well worth it, even if that implies a somewhat high 16x P/S multiple for the segment today. Actually, this multiple is already lower than Visa's, Mastercard's (NYSE:MA), and Affirm's (NASDAQ:AFRM). Realistically, a segment growing at 818% year over year should probably get a higher multiple than these slower-growing companies', but we don't even need to speculate about what a fair multiple is, since we can reach Sea's current valuation by using 16x P/S in my model valuation.One way this segment could grow even more is through the introduction of more products besides the mobile wallet. Sea noted in their recent earnings that they have started \"early initiatives in other digital financial services such as buy now pay later, digital bank, and insurtech.\" These guys sure know how to hop on the latest high growth trend.Finally, there's the investments arm. Sea is investing in early-stage tech companies, especially in Southeast Asia. There's strong precedent for companies like Tencent (which is itself an investor in Sea) and Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) managing successful investment portfolios that ultimately factor meaningfully into their valuation. Right now Sea's investment arm is very early stage, so I don't include it in my valuation model. But it doesn't have to be factored in to justify the current share price. It's just one more area that might be worth a large part of Sea one day.ConclusionLooking at each of Sea's segments, my valuation model indicates that Sea is fairly valued today. However, my model doesn't account for the significant optionality of the newer segments. Just like e-commerce did over the last five years, FinTech (and/or investments) could grow to become a very large part of Sea's business. With the FinTech segment currently growing at 818% year over year, it doesn't take much imagination to see how this happens. Just another year or two of growth at something close to that rate will make the FinTech arm impossible for investors to ignore.This optionality combined general strength in each business has allowed Sea to post an average revenue beat of 7% over the past year. Earnings haven't been as strong, and I expect that to be the main point of contention with my valuation model, as is the case for most unprofitable companies. In particular, I expect some readers will disagree with my valuation of the e-commerce segment. But even if you drop e-commerce all the way down to 5x P/S (a multiple seen today by much slower growing e-commerce companies) that implies 54% downside from today's prices. It's a steep drop for sure, but most companies in today's market would be looking at such a decline if one were to use the most conservative valuation standards possible.Only fast-growing companies like Sea can quickly offset such a decline with revenue growth. As a result, the businesses with the most long-term potential will hardly ever trade at the most conservative valuation possible. And Sea certainly has long-term potential. It's one of the few high-growth companies I own that I could see reaching a trillion-dollar market cap this decade.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2941,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141332,"gmtCreate":1640884548234,"gmtModify":1640884548337,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Coming coming ....","listText":"Coming coming ....","text":"Coming coming ....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141332","repostId":"1196525359","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196525359","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640877249,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1196525359?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 23:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Evgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196525359","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becomi","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becoming a ‘formidable player.’</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>EVgo股价在早盘交易中飙升13%，该公司获得持有评级，分析师认为其正在成为“强大的参与者”。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/683dcc87551a935822d529a2e336fb9d\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Shares of EVgo were initiated with a Hold rating at Needham, with analysts saying the electric-vehicle charging company could become a “formidable player” in the space.</p><p><blockquote>Needham最初对EVgo的股票给予持有评级，分析师表示，这家电动汽车充电公司可能成为该领域的“强大参与者”。</blockquote></p><p>Needham noted EVgo’s strong partnerships and said the company owns its stations, all in high-traffic metropolitan areas.</p><p><blockquote>Needham指出了EVgo强大的合作伙伴关系，并表示该公司拥有自己的车站，全部位于交通繁忙的大都市地区。</blockquote></p><p>“These factors, combined with the company’s disciplined expansion strategy, provide EVgo with industry-leading asset utilization and strong operating leverage,” the analysts wrote in a note Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师在周二的一份报告中写道：“这些因素，加上公司严格的扩张战略，为EVgo提供了行业领先的资产利用率和强大的运营杠杆。”</blockquote></p><p>“We believe the company’s strategy, astute management team, strong liquidity position and solid fundamentals will make it a formidable player in the space. “</p><p><blockquote>“我们相信，该公司的战略、精明的管理团队、强大的流动性状况和坚实的基本面将使其成为该领域的强大参与者。”</blockquote></p><p>Needham, however, said Wall Street expectations on the stock were too aggressive and it would “remain on the sidelines until we see convergence between our estimates and consensus and/or a better entry point.” Needham didn’t issue a price target on EVgo shares.</p><p><blockquote>然而，Needham表示，华尔街对该股的预期过于激进，“在我们看到我们的估计与共识趋同和/或更好的切入点之前，该股将保持观望。”Needham没有发布EVgo股票的目标价。</blockquote></p><p>Analysts surveyed by FactSet rate the stock at Overweight with an average price target of $18.38.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的分析师对跑赢大盘股票的平均目标价为18.38美元。</blockquote></p><p>Earlier this month, EVgo was initiated by J.P. Morgan at Overweight and with a $20 price target, with the analysts seeing the company “driving outsized revenue growth on rapidly increasing fleet adoption and higher utilization.”</p><p><blockquote>本月早些时候，EVgo由跑赢大盘摩根大通发起，目标价为20美元，分析师认为该公司“通过快速增加机队采用率和提高利用率来推动收入大幅增长”。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Evgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEvgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 23:14</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becoming a ‘formidable player.’</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>EVgo股价在早盘交易中飙升13%，该公司获得持有评级，分析师认为其正在成为“强大的参与者”。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/683dcc87551a935822d529a2e336fb9d\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Shares of EVgo were initiated with a Hold rating at Needham, with analysts saying the electric-vehicle charging company could become a “formidable player” in the space.</p><p><blockquote>Needham最初对EVgo的股票给予持有评级，分析师表示，这家电动汽车充电公司可能成为该领域的“强大参与者”。</blockquote></p><p>Needham noted EVgo’s strong partnerships and said the company owns its stations, all in high-traffic metropolitan areas.</p><p><blockquote>Needham指出了EVgo强大的合作伙伴关系，并表示该公司拥有自己的车站，全部位于交通繁忙的大都市地区。</blockquote></p><p>“These factors, combined with the company’s disciplined expansion strategy, provide EVgo with industry-leading asset utilization and strong operating leverage,” the analysts wrote in a note Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师在周二的一份报告中写道：“这些因素，加上公司严格的扩张战略，为EVgo提供了行业领先的资产利用率和强大的运营杠杆。”</blockquote></p><p>“We believe the company’s strategy, astute management team, strong liquidity position and solid fundamentals will make it a formidable player in the space. “</p><p><blockquote>“我们相信，该公司的战略、精明的管理团队、强大的流动性状况和坚实的基本面将使其成为该领域的强大参与者。”</blockquote></p><p>Needham, however, said Wall Street expectations on the stock were too aggressive and it would “remain on the sidelines until we see convergence between our estimates and consensus and/or a better entry point.” Needham didn’t issue a price target on EVgo shares.</p><p><blockquote>然而，Needham表示，华尔街对该股的预期过于激进，“在我们看到我们的估计与共识趋同和/或更好的切入点之前，该股将保持观望。”Needham没有发布EVgo股票的目标价。</blockquote></p><p>Analysts surveyed by FactSet rate the stock at Overweight with an average price target of $18.38.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的分析师对跑赢大盘股票的平均目标价为18.38美元。</blockquote></p><p>Earlier this month, EVgo was initiated by J.P. Morgan at Overweight and with a $20 price target, with the analysts seeing the company “driving outsized revenue growth on rapidly increasing fleet adoption and higher utilization.”</p><p><blockquote>本月早些时候，EVgo由跑赢大盘摩根大通发起，目标价为20美元，分析师认为该公司“通过快速增加机队采用率和提高利用率来推动收入大幅增长”。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EVGO":"EVgo Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196525359","content_text":"EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becoming a ‘formidable player.’Shares of EVgo were initiated with a Hold rating at Needham, with analysts saying the electric-vehicle charging company could become a “formidable player” in the space.Needham noted EVgo’s strong partnerships and said the company owns its stations, all in high-traffic metropolitan areas.“These factors, combined with the company’s disciplined expansion strategy, provide EVgo with industry-leading asset utilization and strong operating leverage,” the analysts wrote in a note Tuesday.“We believe the company’s strategy, astute management team, strong liquidity position and solid fundamentals will make it a formidable player in the space. “Needham, however, said Wall Street expectations on the stock were too aggressive and it would “remain on the sidelines until we see convergence between our estimates and consensus and/or a better entry point.” Needham didn’t issue a price target on EVgo shares.Analysts surveyed by FactSet rate the stock at Overweight with an average price target of $18.38.Earlier this month, EVgo was initiated by J.P. Morgan at Overweight and with a $20 price target, with the analysts seeing the company “driving outsized revenue growth on rapidly increasing fleet adoption and higher utilization.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"EVGO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3143,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141938,"gmtCreate":1640884533150,"gmtModify":1640884533248,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Coming coming","listText":"Coming coming","text":"Coming coming","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141938","repostId":"1196525359","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196525359","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640877249,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1196525359?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 23:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Evgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196525359","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becomi","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becoming a ‘formidable player.’</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>EVgo股价在早盘交易中飙升13%，该公司获得持有评级，分析师认为其正在成为“强大的参与者”。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/683dcc87551a935822d529a2e336fb9d\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Shares of EVgo were initiated with a Hold rating at Needham, with analysts saying the electric-vehicle charging company could become a “formidable player” in the space.</p><p><blockquote>Needham最初对EVgo的股票给予持有评级，分析师表示，这家电动汽车充电公司可能成为该领域的“强大参与者”。</blockquote></p><p>Needham noted EVgo’s strong partnerships and said the company owns its stations, all in high-traffic metropolitan areas.</p><p><blockquote>Needham指出了EVgo强大的合作伙伴关系，并表示该公司拥有自己的车站，全部位于交通繁忙的大都市地区。</blockquote></p><p>“These factors, combined with the company’s disciplined expansion strategy, provide EVgo with industry-leading asset utilization and strong operating leverage,” the analysts wrote in a note Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师在周二的一份报告中写道：“这些因素，加上公司严格的扩张战略，为EVgo提供了行业领先的资产利用率和强大的运营杠杆。”</blockquote></p><p>“We believe the company’s strategy, astute management team, strong liquidity position and solid fundamentals will make it a formidable player in the space. “</p><p><blockquote>“我们相信，该公司的战略、精明的管理团队、强大的流动性状况和坚实的基本面将使其成为该领域的强大参与者。”</blockquote></p><p>Needham, however, said Wall Street expectations on the stock were too aggressive and it would “remain on the sidelines until we see convergence between our estimates and consensus and/or a better entry point.” Needham didn’t issue a price target on EVgo shares.</p><p><blockquote>然而，Needham表示，华尔街对该股的预期过于激进，“在我们看到我们的估计与共识趋同和/或更好的切入点之前，该股将保持观望。”Needham没有发布EVgo股票的目标价。</blockquote></p><p>Analysts surveyed by FactSet rate the stock at Overweight with an average price target of $18.38.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的分析师对跑赢大盘股票的平均目标价为18.38美元。</blockquote></p><p>Earlier this month, EVgo was initiated by J.P. Morgan at Overweight and with a $20 price target, with the analysts seeing the company “driving outsized revenue growth on rapidly increasing fleet adoption and higher utilization.”</p><p><blockquote>本月早些时候，EVgo由跑赢大盘摩根大通发起，目标价为20美元，分析师认为该公司“通过快速增加机队采用率和提高利用率来推动收入大幅增长”。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Evgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEvgo Stock Surged 13% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Evgo股价早盘飙升13%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 23:14</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becoming a ‘formidable player.’</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>EVgo股价在早盘交易中飙升13%，该公司获得持有评级，分析师认为其正在成为“强大的参与者”。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/683dcc87551a935822d529a2e336fb9d\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>Shares of EVgo were initiated with a Hold rating at Needham, with analysts saying the electric-vehicle charging company could become a “formidable player” in the space.</p><p><blockquote>Needham最初对EVgo的股票给予持有评级，分析师表示，这家电动汽车充电公司可能成为该领域的“强大参与者”。</blockquote></p><p>Needham noted EVgo’s strong partnerships and said the company owns its stations, all in high-traffic metropolitan areas.</p><p><blockquote>Needham指出了EVgo强大的合作伙伴关系，并表示该公司拥有自己的车站，全部位于交通繁忙的大都市地区。</blockquote></p><p>“These factors, combined with the company’s disciplined expansion strategy, provide EVgo with industry-leading asset utilization and strong operating leverage,” the analysts wrote in a note Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师在周二的一份报告中写道：“这些因素，加上公司严格的扩张战略，为EVgo提供了行业领先的资产利用率和强大的运营杠杆。”</blockquote></p><p>“We believe the company’s strategy, astute management team, strong liquidity position and solid fundamentals will make it a formidable player in the space. “</p><p><blockquote>“我们相信，该公司的战略、精明的管理团队、强大的流动性状况和坚实的基本面将使其成为该领域的强大参与者。”</blockquote></p><p>Needham, however, said Wall Street expectations on the stock were too aggressive and it would “remain on the sidelines until we see convergence between our estimates and consensus and/or a better entry point.” Needham didn’t issue a price target on EVgo shares.</p><p><blockquote>然而，Needham表示，华尔街对该股的预期过于激进，“在我们看到我们的估计与共识趋同和/或更好的切入点之前，该股将保持观望。”Needham没有发布EVgo股票的目标价。</blockquote></p><p>Analysts surveyed by FactSet rate the stock at Overweight with an average price target of $18.38.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的分析师对跑赢大盘股票的平均目标价为18.38美元。</blockquote></p><p>Earlier this month, EVgo was initiated by J.P. Morgan at Overweight and with a $20 price target, with the analysts seeing the company “driving outsized revenue growth on rapidly increasing fleet adoption and higher utilization.”</p><p><blockquote>本月早些时候，EVgo由跑赢大盘摩根大通发起，目标价为20美元，分析师认为该公司“通过快速增加机队采用率和提高利用率来推动收入大幅增长”。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EVGO":"EVgo Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196525359","content_text":"EVgo Stock surged 13% in morning trading as the company got a hold rating and analysts saw it becoming a ‘formidable player.’Shares of EVgo were initiated with a Hold rating at Needham, with analysts saying the electric-vehicle charging company could become a “formidable player” in the space.Needham noted EVgo’s strong partnerships and said the company owns its stations, all in high-traffic metropolitan areas.“These factors, combined with the company’s disciplined expansion strategy, provide EVgo with industry-leading asset utilization and strong operating leverage,” the analysts wrote in a note Tuesday.“We believe the company’s strategy, astute management team, strong liquidity position and solid fundamentals will make it a formidable player in the space. “Needham, however, said Wall Street expectations on the stock were too aggressive and it would “remain on the sidelines until we see convergence between our estimates and consensus and/or a better entry point.” Needham didn’t issue a price target on EVgo shares.Analysts surveyed by FactSet rate the stock at Overweight with an average price target of $18.38.Earlier this month, EVgo was initiated by J.P. Morgan at Overweight and with a $20 price target, with the analysts seeing the company “driving outsized revenue growth on rapidly increasing fleet adoption and higher utilization.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"EVGO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2086,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696502534,"gmtCreate":1640721693131,"gmtModify":1640721693259,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696502534","repostId":"1172682878","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172682878","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640704390,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172682878?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-28 23:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172682878","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbas","content":"<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBlockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-28 23:13</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","SOS":"SOS Limited","CAN":"嘉楠科技","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","MARA":"MARA Holdings","EBON":"亿邦国际","BTBT":"Bit Digital, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172682878","content_text":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbase, Canaan, SOS Ltd and Ebang International fell between 3% and 8%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"COIN":0.9,"RIOT":0.9,"BTBT":0.9,"CAN":0.9,"MARA":0.9,"SOS":0.9,"EBON":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":609,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696502281,"gmtCreate":1640721684432,"gmtModify":1640721684566,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks for sharing ...[LOL]&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks for sharing ...[LOL]&nbsp;","text":"Thanks for sharing ...[LOL]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696502281","repostId":"1172682878","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172682878","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640704390,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172682878?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-28 23:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172682878","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbas","content":"<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBlockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-28 23:13</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","SOS":"SOS Limited","CAN":"嘉楠科技","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","MARA":"MARA Holdings","EBON":"亿邦国际","BTBT":"Bit Digital, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172682878","content_text":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbase, Canaan, SOS Ltd and Ebang International fell between 3% and 8%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"COIN":0.9,"RIOT":0.9,"BTBT":0.9,"CAN":0.9,"MARA":0.9,"SOS":0.9,"EBON":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":908,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691956125,"gmtCreate":1640129869666,"gmtModify":1640129869762,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good to hear","listText":"Good to hear","text":"Good to hear","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691956125","repostId":"1113826245","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":731,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690273274,"gmtCreate":1639673839450,"gmtModify":1639674030578,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good news","listText":"Good news","text":"Good news","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690273274","repostId":"2191894651","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":772,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690270498,"gmtCreate":1639673587137,"gmtModify":1639673587263,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690270498","repostId":"2191200910","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":762,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690028597,"gmtCreate":1639615095034,"gmtModify":1639619914291,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Actually this type of business company, i buy for future&nbsp;","listText":"Actually this type of business company, i buy for future&nbsp;","text":"Actually this type of business company, i buy for future","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690028597","repostId":"1143795954","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":491,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607196998,"gmtCreate":1639495073155,"gmtModify":1639495073259,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607196998","repostId":"1155236279","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":678,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604254917,"gmtCreate":1639406523859,"gmtModify":1639406523987,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604254917","repostId":"1167465214","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1167465214","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639406352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1167465214?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 22:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share<blockquote>辉瑞以100美元/股收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，早盘股价上涨逾80%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167465214","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.Pfi","content":"<p>Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baca4cde05c414b1c77aa618108489b1\" tg-width=\"774\" tg-height=\"568\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Pfizer Inc has agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal to expand its cancer and inflammatory disease treatment pipeline, the companies said on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞(Pfizer)以每股100美元的价格收购了Arena Pharmaceuticals，该公司在早盘交易中股价上涨了80%以上。辉瑞公司周一表示，已同意以67亿美元的全现金交易收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，以扩大其癌症和炎症性疾病治疗产品线。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer will take over all outstanding shares of Arena for $100 per share, representing a 100.2% premium to Arena's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞将以每股100美元的价格收购Arena的所有流通股，较Arena最后收盘价溢价100.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Arena is developing several treatments for gastroenterology, dermatology, and cardiology. The drug developer's ulcerative colitis treatment candidate, etrasimod, is in a late-stage study.</p><p><blockquote>Arena正在为胃肠病学、皮肤病学和心脏病学开发几种治疗方法。该药物开发商的溃疡性结肠炎治疗候选药物etrasimod正处于后期研究阶段。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer said it expects to finance the transaction with cash on hand.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞表示，预计将用手头现金为此次交易提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer’s financial advisers for the transaction are BofA Securities and Centerview Partners LLC, while Guggenheim Securities LLC and Evercore Group LLC advised Arena.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞此次交易的财务顾问是美国银行证券和Centerview Partners LLC，而古根海姆证券有限责任公司和Evercore Group LLC为Arena提供咨询。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share<blockquote>辉瑞以100美元/股收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，早盘股价上涨逾80%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nArena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share<blockquote>辉瑞以100美元/股收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，早盘股价上涨逾80%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-13 22:39</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baca4cde05c414b1c77aa618108489b1\" tg-width=\"774\" tg-height=\"568\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Pfizer Inc has agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal to expand its cancer and inflammatory disease treatment pipeline, the companies said on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞(Pfizer)以每股100美元的价格收购了Arena Pharmaceuticals，该公司在早盘交易中股价上涨了80%以上。辉瑞公司周一表示，已同意以67亿美元的全现金交易收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，以扩大其癌症和炎症性疾病治疗产品线。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer will take over all outstanding shares of Arena for $100 per share, representing a 100.2% premium to Arena's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞将以每股100美元的价格收购Arena的所有流通股，较Arena最后收盘价溢价100.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Arena is developing several treatments for gastroenterology, dermatology, and cardiology. The drug developer's ulcerative colitis treatment candidate, etrasimod, is in a late-stage study.</p><p><blockquote>Arena正在为胃肠病学、皮肤病学和心脏病学开发几种治疗方法。该药物开发商的溃疡性结肠炎治疗候选药物etrasimod正处于后期研究阶段。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer said it expects to finance the transaction with cash on hand.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞表示，预计将用手头现金为此次交易提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer’s financial advisers for the transaction are BofA Securities and Centerview Partners LLC, while Guggenheim Securities LLC and Evercore Group LLC advised Arena.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞此次交易的财务顾问是美国银行证券和Centerview Partners LLC，而古根海姆证券有限责任公司和Evercore Group LLC为Arena提供咨询。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARNA":"阿里那","PFE":"辉瑞"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167465214","content_text":"Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.Pfizer Inc has agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal to expand its cancer and inflammatory disease treatment pipeline, the companies said on Monday.\nPfizer will take over all outstanding shares of Arena for $100 per share, representing a 100.2% premium to Arena's last closing price.\nArena is developing several treatments for gastroenterology, dermatology, and cardiology. The drug developer's ulcerative colitis treatment candidate, etrasimod, is in a late-stage study.\nPfizer said it expects to finance the transaction with cash on hand.\nPfizer’s financial advisers for the transaction are BofA Securities and Centerview Partners LLC, while Guggenheim Securities LLC and Evercore Group LLC advised Arena.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PFE":0.9,"ARNA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":919,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604221022,"gmtCreate":1639405471805,"gmtModify":1639405471904,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good sharing","listText":"Good sharing","text":"Good sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604221022","repostId":"1103876293","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1103876293","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639365728,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103876293?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 11:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Supercharged Electric-Vehicle Stocks to Buy in 2022 and Beyond<blockquote>2022年及以后值得买入的3只增压电动汽车股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103876293","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These three companies involve different risks, but each could supercharge your portfolio over the long term.","content":"<p>An investor who wants to dive into the electric-vehicle (EV) sector should be comfortable with a variety of risks. But those risks balance with potential rewards. That's what investing is all about, after all.</p><p><blockquote>想要进入电动汽车（EV）行业的投资者应该能够承受各种风险。但这些风险与潜在回报相平衡。毕竟，这就是投资的意义所在。</blockquote></p><p> Three EV stocks that could supercharge your portfolio in 2022 and beyond ironically also each bring a unique and significant risk as an investment. There's no better way to vet a potential investment than to thoroughly review its risks. If you can be comfortable with the potential downside, now might be a good time to invest in these EV-sector names.</p><p><blockquote>具有讽刺意味的是，三只电动汽车股票可能会在2022年及以后增强您的投资组合，但每只股票都带来了独特而重大的投资风险。没有比彻底审查其风险更好的审查潜在投资的方法了。如果您能够接受潜在的负面影响，那么现在可能是投资这些电动汽车行业名称的好时机。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bcb0b015b34cd60db51bb86343dcbbe\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"935\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Nio: A second wind</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来：第二次风</b></blockquote></p><p> Chinese EV-maker&nbsp;<b>Nio</b>(NIO)&nbsp;took advantage of excessive investor enthusiasm, which drove its valuation to nearly $100 billion before the company had earned a dime in net earnings. After flirting with bankruptcy as recently as two years ago, the company raised money in the capital markets, and now has about $7.3 billion in cash on its balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商<b>蔚来</b>（蔚来）利用了投资者的过度热情，在该公司还没有赚到一毛钱的净利润之前，就将其估值推高到了近1000亿美元。在两年前濒临破产后，该公司在资本市场筹集了资金，截至2021年9月30日，其资产负债表上目前拥有约73亿美元现金。</blockquote></p><p> That second wind has resulted in the company delivering more than 150,000 cumulative vehicles, as of the end of November. Nio reports monthly deliveries, and the below chart shows how fast they have ramped up shipments since the start of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>截至11月底，第二次风使该公司累计交付了超过150,000辆汽车。蔚来报告每月交付量，下图显示了自2020年初以来他们增加出货量的速度。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8342eca7f9e9cb69ffa016615c11bbcb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1151\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data source: Nio. Chart by author.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来源：蔚来。作者图表。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Nio is also preparing to double its capacity and add new models, which hindered production in October 2021. The company took production down for the first half of the month in preparation for the new ET7 luxury sedan it will begin selling early in 2022. The increase in production capacity comes as the company is branching out of its native China into Europe. It has established a presence in Norway and intends to deliver vehicles in Germany next year.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来还准备将产能翻倍并增加新车型，这阻碍了2021年10月的生产。该公司减少了上半月的产量，为将于2022年初开始销售的新款ET7豪华轿车做准备。产能的增加正值该公司将业务从本土中国扩展到欧洲之际。它已在挪威建立了业务，并打算明年在德国交付车辆。</blockquote></p><p> Those two markets should lead global growth in EVs, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). EV sales in China and Europe led the world in 2020, with a combined total of 2.7 million units. In its 2021 global EV outlook, the agency offered two scenarios for the EV sector over the next decade.</p><p><blockquote>国际能源署(IEA)表示，这两个市场应该会引领全球电动汽车的增长。2020年，中国和欧洲的电动汽车销量领先全球，总计270万辆。该机构在其2021年全球电动汽车展望中为电动汽车行业提供了未来十年的两种情景。</blockquote></p><p> By 2030, it expects China and Europe to continue to lead the way with at least 16.6 million vehicles and as many as 25.3 million, if government initiatives focus more on sustainability. Nio looks to be in a prime spot in the biggest markets for explosive growth in the coming years, giving investors an opportunity, as long as the company executes well.</p><p><blockquote>到2030年，如果政府举措更加注重可持续发展，预计中国和欧洲将继续以至少1660万辆和多达2530万辆的数量领先。只要公司执行良好，蔚来看起来将在未来几年爆炸性增长的最大市场中处于领先地位，为投资者提供机会。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4accec987e9af0f29cc462664deb37d4\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Lucid's luxury electric Air sedan. Image source: Lucid Group.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Lucid的豪华电动空气轿车。图片来源：Lucid Group。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lucid: High expectations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid：高期望</b></blockquote></p><p> Analysts and investors following the EV sector have been watching&nbsp;<b>Lucid Group</b>(LCID)&nbsp;since well before it went public by merging with a&nbsp;special purpose acquisition company (SPAC)&nbsp;in late July. Peter Rawlinson, the company's CEO and chief technology officer (CTO), worked as lead engineer at&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>&nbsp;on its Model S development program. That made some believe his new company and its luxury electric sedans could be the first true competition for the leading EV company.</p><p><blockquote>关注电动汽车行业的分析师和投资者一直在关注<b>Lucid集团</b>(LCID)早在7月底与一家特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)合并上市之前就已上市。该公司首席执行官兼首席技术官(CTO)Peter Rawlinson曾担任首席工程师<b>特斯拉</b>关于其Model S开发计划。这让一些人相信他的新公司及其豪华电动轿车可能是这家领先电动汽车公司的第一次真正竞争。</blockquote></p><p> Lucid provided investors with lofty goals and projections prior to its public debut. Without expecting any meaningful revenue in 2021, the company said in a July 2021 investor presentation that it expects sales to exceed $2 billion in 2022. With plans to introduce its next vehicle, the Gravity luxury SUV, in late 2023, it hopes to be close to $10 billion in revenue for 2024.</p><p><blockquote>Lucid在首次公开募股之前为投资者提供了崇高的目标和预测。该公司在2021年7月的投资者演示中表示，预计2022年销售额将超过20亿美元，但预计2021年不会有任何有意义的收入。该公司计划于2023年底推出下一代汽车Gravity豪华SUV，希望2024年收入接近100亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scrutinizing several start-up companies that have gone public via SPAC and&nbsp;is now looking into certain early projections and statements that Lucid provided. Investors don't yet know the details of that subpoena, but it illuminates another risk associated with investing in early stage EV companies.</p><p><blockquote>但美国证券交易委员会(SEC)正在审查几家通过SPAC上市的初创公司，目前正在调查Lucid提供的某些早期预测和声明。投资者尚不知道该传票的细节，但它揭示了与投资早期电动汽车公司相关的另一个风险。</blockquote></p><p> The business itself is off to a good start, however. Lucid's first car launched on schedule, and the Air has won accolades, including being named<i>MotorTrend</i>2022 Car of the Year. It also has the highest EV battery-range rating given by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at 520 miles. Lucid may be on a path to greatness, but it still has a long road ahead. With a market cap of over $73 billion just as it is beginning production,it will need to execute perfectly to justify its valuation.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这项业务本身已经有了一个良好的开端。Lucid首款车如期上市，Air屡获殊荣，包括被命名<i>汽车趋势</i>2022年度汽车。它还拥有环境保护署(EPA)给出的最高电动汽车电池续航里程评级，为520英里。Lucid可能正在走向伟大，但它还有很长的路要走。该公司刚刚开始生产，市值就超过730亿美元，因此需要完美执行才能证明其估值合理。</blockquote></p><p> <b>ChargePoint: Exceeding early projections</b></p><p><blockquote><b>ChargePoint：超出早期预测</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> EV-charging network leader&nbsp;<b>ChargePoint Holdings</b>(CHPT)&nbsp;also went public through a SPAC merger and has reported multiple financial updates as a public company already. How Lucid measures up to its own projections remains to be seen, but so far, ChargePoint has achieved what it told investors it would, and more.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车充电网络领导者<b>ChargePoint控股</b>(CHPT)也通过SPAC合并上市，并已作为上市公司报告了多项财务更新。Lucid如何达到自己的预测还有待观察，但到目前为止，ChargePoint已经实现了它告诉投资者的目标，甚至更多。</blockquote></p><p> In the company's fiscal third-quarter 2022 report released this week, management increased revenue guidance for the fiscal-year period ending Jan. 31, 2022 for the second time since its public debut. ChargePoint told investors in a July presentation that it expected fiscal-year revenue of $198 million. That's now been moved up to a range of $235 million to $240 million.</p><p><blockquote>在该公司本周发布的2022财年第三季度报告中，管理层自上市以来第二次上调了截至2022年1月31日财年的收入指引。ChargePoint在7月份的一次演示中告诉投资者，预计财年收入为1.98亿美元。现在这一数字已上升至2.35亿至2.4亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> ChargePoint is also off to a fine start as a public company. It expects to continue to be the leading North American charging-network company and is also expanding in Europe. ChargePoint's gross margin increased 500 basis points to 25% in its most-recent quarter, compared to the prior-year period.</p><p><blockquote>ChargePoint作为一家上市公司也有了一个良好的开端。该公司预计将继续成为北美领先的充电网络公司，并在欧洲扩张。与去年同期相比，ChargePoint最近一个季度的毛利率增长了500个基点，达到25%。</blockquote></p><p> Though the company reported a larger net loss year over year, it increased revenue by 79%. As it builds out its physical charging ports, it will look toward profitability through its network subscription services. Its risks should also not be minimized.</p><p><blockquote>尽管该公司报告的净亏损同比更大，但收入却增长了79%。随着其物理充电端口的建设，它将通过其网络订阅服务寻求盈利。其风险也不应被低估。</blockquote></p><p> There will be plenty of competition, but ChargePoint has a head start and could be in position to gain a large piece of the rapidly growing EV charging-services pie.</p><p><blockquote>竞争将会很激烈，但ChargePoint处于领先地位，可能会在快速增长的电动汽车充电服务蛋糕中获得很大一部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Supercharged Electric-Vehicle Stocks to Buy in 2022 and Beyond<blockquote>2022年及以后值得买入的3只增压电动汽车股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Supercharged Electric-Vehicle Stocks to Buy in 2022 and Beyond<blockquote>2022年及以后值得买入的3只增压电动汽车股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-13 11:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>An investor who wants to dive into the electric-vehicle (EV) sector should be comfortable with a variety of risks. But those risks balance with potential rewards. That's what investing is all about, after all.</p><p><blockquote>想要进入电动汽车（EV）行业的投资者应该能够承受各种风险。但这些风险与潜在回报相平衡。毕竟，这就是投资的意义所在。</blockquote></p><p> Three EV stocks that could supercharge your portfolio in 2022 and beyond ironically also each bring a unique and significant risk as an investment. There's no better way to vet a potential investment than to thoroughly review its risks. If you can be comfortable with the potential downside, now might be a good time to invest in these EV-sector names.</p><p><blockquote>具有讽刺意味的是，三只电动汽车股票可能会在2022年及以后增强您的投资组合，但每只股票都带来了独特而重大的投资风险。没有比彻底审查其风险更好的审查潜在投资的方法了。如果您能够接受潜在的负面影响，那么现在可能是投资这些电动汽车行业名称的好时机。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bcb0b015b34cd60db51bb86343dcbbe\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"935\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Nio: A second wind</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来：第二次风</b></blockquote></p><p> Chinese EV-maker&nbsp;<b>Nio</b>(NIO)&nbsp;took advantage of excessive investor enthusiasm, which drove its valuation to nearly $100 billion before the company had earned a dime in net earnings. After flirting with bankruptcy as recently as two years ago, the company raised money in the capital markets, and now has about $7.3 billion in cash on its balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商<b>蔚来</b>（蔚来）利用了投资者的过度热情，在该公司还没有赚到一毛钱的净利润之前，就将其估值推高到了近1000亿美元。在两年前濒临破产后，该公司在资本市场筹集了资金，截至2021年9月30日，其资产负债表上目前拥有约73亿美元现金。</blockquote></p><p> That second wind has resulted in the company delivering more than 150,000 cumulative vehicles, as of the end of November. Nio reports monthly deliveries, and the below chart shows how fast they have ramped up shipments since the start of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>截至11月底，第二次风使该公司累计交付了超过150,000辆汽车。蔚来报告每月交付量，下图显示了自2020年初以来他们增加出货量的速度。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8342eca7f9e9cb69ffa016615c11bbcb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1151\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data source: Nio. Chart by author.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来源：蔚来。作者图表。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Nio is also preparing to double its capacity and add new models, which hindered production in October 2021. The company took production down for the first half of the month in preparation for the new ET7 luxury sedan it will begin selling early in 2022. The increase in production capacity comes as the company is branching out of its native China into Europe. It has established a presence in Norway and intends to deliver vehicles in Germany next year.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来还准备将产能翻倍并增加新车型，这阻碍了2021年10月的生产。该公司减少了上半月的产量，为将于2022年初开始销售的新款ET7豪华轿车做准备。产能的增加正值该公司将业务从本土中国扩展到欧洲之际。它已在挪威建立了业务，并打算明年在德国交付车辆。</blockquote></p><p> Those two markets should lead global growth in EVs, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). EV sales in China and Europe led the world in 2020, with a combined total of 2.7 million units. In its 2021 global EV outlook, the agency offered two scenarios for the EV sector over the next decade.</p><p><blockquote>国际能源署(IEA)表示，这两个市场应该会引领全球电动汽车的增长。2020年，中国和欧洲的电动汽车销量领先全球，总计270万辆。该机构在其2021年全球电动汽车展望中为电动汽车行业提供了未来十年的两种情景。</blockquote></p><p> By 2030, it expects China and Europe to continue to lead the way with at least 16.6 million vehicles and as many as 25.3 million, if government initiatives focus more on sustainability. Nio looks to be in a prime spot in the biggest markets for explosive growth in the coming years, giving investors an opportunity, as long as the company executes well.</p><p><blockquote>到2030年，如果政府举措更加注重可持续发展，预计中国和欧洲将继续以至少1660万辆和多达2530万辆的数量领先。只要公司执行良好，蔚来看起来将在未来几年爆炸性增长的最大市场中处于领先地位，为投资者提供机会。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4accec987e9af0f29cc462664deb37d4\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Lucid's luxury electric Air sedan. Image source: Lucid Group.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Lucid的豪华电动空气轿车。图片来源：Lucid Group。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lucid: High expectations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid：高期望</b></blockquote></p><p> Analysts and investors following the EV sector have been watching&nbsp;<b>Lucid Group</b>(LCID)&nbsp;since well before it went public by merging with a&nbsp;special purpose acquisition company (SPAC)&nbsp;in late July. Peter Rawlinson, the company's CEO and chief technology officer (CTO), worked as lead engineer at&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>&nbsp;on its Model S development program. That made some believe his new company and its luxury electric sedans could be the first true competition for the leading EV company.</p><p><blockquote>关注电动汽车行业的分析师和投资者一直在关注<b>Lucid集团</b>(LCID)早在7月底与一家特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)合并上市之前就已上市。该公司首席执行官兼首席技术官(CTO)Peter Rawlinson曾担任首席工程师<b>特斯拉</b>关于其Model S开发计划。这让一些人相信他的新公司及其豪华电动轿车可能是这家领先电动汽车公司的第一次真正竞争。</blockquote></p><p> Lucid provided investors with lofty goals and projections prior to its public debut. Without expecting any meaningful revenue in 2021, the company said in a July 2021 investor presentation that it expects sales to exceed $2 billion in 2022. With plans to introduce its next vehicle, the Gravity luxury SUV, in late 2023, it hopes to be close to $10 billion in revenue for 2024.</p><p><blockquote>Lucid在首次公开募股之前为投资者提供了崇高的目标和预测。该公司在2021年7月的投资者演示中表示，预计2022年销售额将超过20亿美元，但预计2021年不会有任何有意义的收入。该公司计划于2023年底推出下一代汽车Gravity豪华SUV，希望2024年收入接近100亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scrutinizing several start-up companies that have gone public via SPAC and&nbsp;is now looking into certain early projections and statements that Lucid provided. Investors don't yet know the details of that subpoena, but it illuminates another risk associated with investing in early stage EV companies.</p><p><blockquote>但美国证券交易委员会(SEC)正在审查几家通过SPAC上市的初创公司，目前正在调查Lucid提供的某些早期预测和声明。投资者尚不知道该传票的细节，但它揭示了与投资早期电动汽车公司相关的另一个风险。</blockquote></p><p> The business itself is off to a good start, however. Lucid's first car launched on schedule, and the Air has won accolades, including being named<i>MotorTrend</i>2022 Car of the Year. It also has the highest EV battery-range rating given by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at 520 miles. Lucid may be on a path to greatness, but it still has a long road ahead. With a market cap of over $73 billion just as it is beginning production,it will need to execute perfectly to justify its valuation.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这项业务本身已经有了一个良好的开端。Lucid首款车如期上市，Air屡获殊荣，包括被命名<i>汽车趋势</i>2022年度汽车。它还拥有环境保护署(EPA)给出的最高电动汽车电池续航里程评级，为520英里。Lucid可能正在走向伟大，但它还有很长的路要走。该公司刚刚开始生产，市值就超过730亿美元，因此需要完美执行才能证明其估值合理。</blockquote></p><p> <b>ChargePoint: Exceeding early projections</b></p><p><blockquote><b>ChargePoint：超出早期预测</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> EV-charging network leader&nbsp;<b>ChargePoint Holdings</b>(CHPT)&nbsp;also went public through a SPAC merger and has reported multiple financial updates as a public company already. How Lucid measures up to its own projections remains to be seen, but so far, ChargePoint has achieved what it told investors it would, and more.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车充电网络领导者<b>ChargePoint控股</b>(CHPT)也通过SPAC合并上市，并已作为上市公司报告了多项财务更新。Lucid如何达到自己的预测还有待观察，但到目前为止，ChargePoint已经实现了它告诉投资者的目标，甚至更多。</blockquote></p><p> In the company's fiscal third-quarter 2022 report released this week, management increased revenue guidance for the fiscal-year period ending Jan. 31, 2022 for the second time since its public debut. ChargePoint told investors in a July presentation that it expected fiscal-year revenue of $198 million. That's now been moved up to a range of $235 million to $240 million.</p><p><blockquote>在该公司本周发布的2022财年第三季度报告中，管理层自上市以来第二次上调了截至2022年1月31日财年的收入指引。ChargePoint在7月份的一次演示中告诉投资者，预计财年收入为1.98亿美元。现在这一数字已上升至2.35亿至2.4亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> ChargePoint is also off to a fine start as a public company. It expects to continue to be the leading North American charging-network company and is also expanding in Europe. ChargePoint's gross margin increased 500 basis points to 25% in its most-recent quarter, compared to the prior-year period.</p><p><blockquote>ChargePoint作为一家上市公司也有了一个良好的开端。该公司预计将继续成为北美领先的充电网络公司，并在欧洲扩张。与去年同期相比，ChargePoint最近一个季度的毛利率增长了500个基点，达到25%。</blockquote></p><p> Though the company reported a larger net loss year over year, it increased revenue by 79%. As it builds out its physical charging ports, it will look toward profitability through its network subscription services. Its risks should also not be minimized.</p><p><blockquote>尽管该公司报告的净亏损同比更大，但收入却增长了79%。随着其物理充电端口的建设，它将通过其网络订阅服务寻求盈利。其风险也不应被低估。</blockquote></p><p> There will be plenty of competition, but ChargePoint has a head start and could be in position to gain a large piece of the rapidly growing EV charging-services pie.</p><p><blockquote>竞争将会很激烈，但ChargePoint处于领先地位，可能会在快速增长的电动汽车充电服务蛋糕中获得很大一部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/12/3-supercharged-ev-stocks-to-buy-in-2022-and-beyond/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LCID":"Lucid Group Inc","NIO":"蔚来","CHPT":"ChargePoint Holdings Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/12/3-supercharged-ev-stocks-to-buy-in-2022-and-beyond/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103876293","content_text":"An investor who wants to dive into the electric-vehicle (EV) sector should be comfortable with a variety of risks. But those risks balance with potential rewards. That's what investing is all about, after all.\nThree EV stocks that could supercharge your portfolio in 2022 and beyond ironically also each bring a unique and significant risk as an investment. There's no better way to vet a potential investment than to thoroughly review its risks. If you can be comfortable with the potential downside, now might be a good time to invest in these EV-sector names.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nNio: A second wind\nChinese EV-maker Nio(NIO) took advantage of excessive investor enthusiasm, which drove its valuation to nearly $100 billion before the company had earned a dime in net earnings. After flirting with bankruptcy as recently as two years ago, the company raised money in the capital markets, and now has about $7.3 billion in cash on its balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2021.\nThat second wind has resulted in the company delivering more than 150,000 cumulative vehicles, as of the end of November. Nio reports monthly deliveries, and the below chart shows how fast they have ramped up shipments since the start of 2020.\nData source: Nio. Chart by author.\nNio is also preparing to double its capacity and add new models, which hindered production in October 2021. The company took production down for the first half of the month in preparation for the new ET7 luxury sedan it will begin selling early in 2022. The increase in production capacity comes as the company is branching out of its native China into Europe. It has established a presence in Norway and intends to deliver vehicles in Germany next year.\nThose two markets should lead global growth in EVs, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). EV sales in China and Europe led the world in 2020, with a combined total of 2.7 million units. In its 2021 global EV outlook, the agency offered two scenarios for the EV sector over the next decade.\nBy 2030, it expects China and Europe to continue to lead the way with at least 16.6 million vehicles and as many as 25.3 million, if government initiatives focus more on sustainability. Nio looks to be in a prime spot in the biggest markets for explosive growth in the coming years, giving investors an opportunity, as long as the company executes well.\nLucid's luxury electric Air sedan. Image source: Lucid Group.\nLucid: High expectations\nAnalysts and investors following the EV sector have been watching Lucid Group(LCID) since well before it went public by merging with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in late July. Peter Rawlinson, the company's CEO and chief technology officer (CTO), worked as lead engineer at Tesla on its Model S development program. That made some believe his new company and its luxury electric sedans could be the first true competition for the leading EV company.\nLucid provided investors with lofty goals and projections prior to its public debut. Without expecting any meaningful revenue in 2021, the company said in a July 2021 investor presentation that it expects sales to exceed $2 billion in 2022. With plans to introduce its next vehicle, the Gravity luxury SUV, in late 2023, it hopes to be close to $10 billion in revenue for 2024.\nBut the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scrutinizing several start-up companies that have gone public via SPAC and is now looking into certain early projections and statements that Lucid provided. Investors don't yet know the details of that subpoena, but it illuminates another risk associated with investing in early stage EV companies.\nThe business itself is off to a good start, however. Lucid's first car launched on schedule, and the Air has won accolades, including being namedMotorTrend2022 Car of the Year. It also has the highest EV battery-range rating given by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at 520 miles. Lucid may be on a path to greatness, but it still has a long road ahead. With a market cap of over $73 billion just as it is beginning production,it will need to execute perfectly to justify its valuation.\nChargePoint: Exceeding early projections\nEV-charging network leader ChargePoint Holdings(CHPT) also went public through a SPAC merger and has reported multiple financial updates as a public company already. How Lucid measures up to its own projections remains to be seen, but so far, ChargePoint has achieved what it told investors it would, and more.\nIn the company's fiscal third-quarter 2022 report released this week, management increased revenue guidance for the fiscal-year period ending Jan. 31, 2022 for the second time since its public debut. ChargePoint told investors in a July presentation that it expected fiscal-year revenue of $198 million. That's now been moved up to a range of $235 million to $240 million.\nChargePoint is also off to a fine start as a public company. It expects to continue to be the leading North American charging-network company and is also expanding in Europe. ChargePoint's gross margin increased 500 basis points to 25% in its most-recent quarter, compared to the prior-year period.\nThough the company reported a larger net loss year over year, it increased revenue by 79%. As it builds out its physical charging ports, it will look toward profitability through its network subscription services. Its risks should also not be minimized.\nThere will be plenty of competition, but ChargePoint has a head start and could be in position to gain a large piece of the rapidly growing EV charging-services pie.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9,"LCID":0.9,"CHPT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1099,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606036907,"gmtCreate":1638800058155,"gmtModify":1638800067659,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tq","listText":"Tq","text":"Tq","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606036907","repostId":"1107494736","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1107494736","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638799191,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107494736?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-06 21:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock Is an Attractive Buy, Says KeyBanc. Price Target Set at $191.<blockquote>KeyBanc表示，苹果股票是一个有吸引力的买入。目标价定为191美元。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107494736","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the ","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the stock with a bullish outlook, citing growth in the tech giant’s services segment.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价周一上涨，此前KeyBanc Capital Markets分析师以这家科技巨头服务领域的增长为由，对该股前景看好。</blockquote></p><p> Analyst Brandon Nispel rated the stock Overweight with a $191 price target. The target presents an 18% increase from Apple’s (ticker: AAPL) $161.84 closing price on Friday. The stock was up 1.2% to $163.73 in premarket trading Monday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师Brandon Nispel将该股跑赢大盘评级为191美元。该目标较苹果（股票代码：AAPL）周五161.84美元的收盘价上涨18%。周一盘前交易中，该股上涨1.2%，至163.73美元。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 42 analysts covering the stock surveyed by FactSet, 32 have it at a Buy or Overweight rating, nine rated it at Hold, and one rated it Underweight.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的42名分析师中，32名分析师给予该股买入或跑赢大盘评级，9名分析师给予持有，1名分析师给予跑输大盘评级。</blockquote></p><p> “While AAPL is expensive by historical valuations, we find AAPL attractive relative to other mega-caps,” Nispel wrote on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔周一写道：“虽然从历史估值来看，苹果公司价格昂贵，但我们发现苹果公司相对于其他大型股具有吸引力。”</blockquote></p><p> The analyst outlined three main reasons for his bullish take. Nispel doesn’t believe iPhone unit sales have peaked, with the 5G upgrade cycle potentially pushing Apple past its current peak; he believes the company has managed to increase its product breadth to reduce reliability on iPhone sales; and he foresees services to grow at rates multiple times faster than user growth.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师概述了他看涨的三个主要原因。Nispel认为iPhone销量尚未见顶，5G升级周期可能会推动苹果超过目前的峰值；他认为，该公司已设法增加其产品广度，以降低iPhone销售的可靠性；他预计服务的增长速度将是用户增长速度的数倍。</blockquote></p><p> The analyst forecasts Apple to have 1.09 billion active iPhones and 1.8 billion active installed devices by the end of the first quarter of the 2022 fiscal year. This presents a 7% and 8% year-over-year increase, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>该分析师预测，到2022财年第一季度末，苹果将拥有10.9亿部活跃iPhone和18亿部活跃安装设备。这分别同比增长7%和8%。</blockquote></p><p> “This shows a healthy growing user base where Apple iPhone market share is low relative to key geographies outside the United States,” Nispel wrote. “As the installed base grows, a larger base can support more sales on lower upgrade rates.”</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道：“这表明用户群健康增长，相对于美国以外的主要地区，苹果iPhone市场份额较低。”“随着安装基础的增长，更大的基础可以以较低的升级率支持更多的销售。”</blockquote></p><p> Apple’s international segment is likely to grow faster in the coming years as other countries adapt to 5G, prompting a wave of upgrades to compatible hardware, Nispel wrote. He estimates every 1% increase in 5G upgrade rates could drive an incremental 11 million iPhone unit sales.</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道，随着其他国家适应5G，苹果的国际市场在未来几年可能会增长更快，从而引发一波兼容硬件的升级浪潮。他估计，5G升级率每增加1%，iPhone销量就可能增加1100万部。</blockquote></p><p> As hardware adoption grows, so does Apple’s services business. The segment, which includes services such as Apple TV+, Music, News+, AppleCare, Advertising, and Cloud, has grown 27% in the 2021 fiscal year. Over time, it could become a key profitability driver, growing to more than $100 billion by 2024, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>随着硬件采用率的增长，苹果的服务业务也在增长。该部门包括苹果TV+、音乐、News+、AppleCare、广告和云等服务，在2021财年增长了27%。Nispel表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会成为关键的盈利驱动力，到2024年将增长到1000亿美元以上。</blockquote></p><p> Nispel recognized that Apple’s App Store legal battles were concerning, but were “likely more a bend, not break outcome.” The company has had to make modest changes to its App Store guidance in response to court rulings and regulatory changes, including lowering its commission for some developers. It will likely make more concessions over time, such as allowing developers to provide third-party payment options, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔承认，苹果的应用商店法律诉讼令人担忧，但“可能更多的是一个转变，而不是突破的结果”。该公司不得不对其应用商店指南进行适度修改，以应对法院裁决和监管变化，包括降低一些开发者的佣金。尼斯佩尔表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会做出更多让步，例如允许开发商提供第三方支付选项。</blockquote></p><p> “We expect regulation to take time to implement, and believe Apple’s competitive advantage is unlikely to be substantially harmed,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“我们预计监管需要时间来实施，并相信苹果的竞争优势不太可能受到实质性损害，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock Is an Attractive Buy, Says KeyBanc. Price Target Set at $191.<blockquote>KeyBanc表示，苹果股票是一个有吸引力的买入。目标价定为191美元。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock Is an Attractive Buy, Says KeyBanc. Price Target Set at $191.<blockquote>KeyBanc表示，苹果股票是一个有吸引力的买入。目标价定为191美元。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-06 21:59</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple&nbsp;shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the stock with a bullish outlook, citing growth in the tech giant’s services segment.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价周一上涨，此前KeyBanc Capital Markets分析师以这家科技巨头服务领域的增长为由，对该股前景看好。</blockquote></p><p> Analyst Brandon Nispel rated the stock Overweight with a $191 price target. The target presents an 18% increase from Apple’s (ticker: AAPL) $161.84 closing price on Friday. The stock was up 1.2% to $163.73 in premarket trading Monday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师Brandon Nispel将该股跑赢大盘评级为191美元。该目标较苹果（股票代码：AAPL）周五161.84美元的收盘价上涨18%。周一盘前交易中，该股上涨1.2%，至163.73美元。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 42 analysts covering the stock surveyed by FactSet, 32 have it at a Buy or Overweight rating, nine rated it at Hold, and one rated it Underweight.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的42名分析师中，32名分析师给予该股买入或跑赢大盘评级，9名分析师给予持有，1名分析师给予跑输大盘评级。</blockquote></p><p> “While AAPL is expensive by historical valuations, we find AAPL attractive relative to other mega-caps,” Nispel wrote on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔周一写道：“虽然从历史估值来看，苹果公司价格昂贵，但我们发现苹果公司相对于其他大型股具有吸引力。”</blockquote></p><p> The analyst outlined three main reasons for his bullish take. Nispel doesn’t believe iPhone unit sales have peaked, with the 5G upgrade cycle potentially pushing Apple past its current peak; he believes the company has managed to increase its product breadth to reduce reliability on iPhone sales; and he foresees services to grow at rates multiple times faster than user growth.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师概述了他看涨的三个主要原因。Nispel认为iPhone销量尚未见顶，5G升级周期可能会推动苹果超过目前的峰值；他认为，该公司已设法增加其产品广度，以降低iPhone销售的可靠性；他预计服务的增长速度将是用户增长速度的数倍。</blockquote></p><p> The analyst forecasts Apple to have 1.09 billion active iPhones and 1.8 billion active installed devices by the end of the first quarter of the 2022 fiscal year. This presents a 7% and 8% year-over-year increase, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>该分析师预测，到2022财年第一季度末，苹果将拥有10.9亿部活跃iPhone和18亿部活跃安装设备。这分别同比增长7%和8%。</blockquote></p><p> “This shows a healthy growing user base where Apple iPhone market share is low relative to key geographies outside the United States,” Nispel wrote. “As the installed base grows, a larger base can support more sales on lower upgrade rates.”</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道：“这表明用户群健康增长，相对于美国以外的主要地区，苹果iPhone市场份额较低。”“随着安装基础的增长，更大的基础可以以较低的升级率支持更多的销售。”</blockquote></p><p> Apple’s international segment is likely to grow faster in the coming years as other countries adapt to 5G, prompting a wave of upgrades to compatible hardware, Nispel wrote. He estimates every 1% increase in 5G upgrade rates could drive an incremental 11 million iPhone unit sales.</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道，随着其他国家适应5G，苹果的国际市场在未来几年可能会增长更快，从而引发一波兼容硬件的升级浪潮。他估计，5G升级率每增加1%，iPhone销量就可能增加1100万部。</blockquote></p><p> As hardware adoption grows, so does Apple’s services business. The segment, which includes services such as Apple TV+, Music, News+, AppleCare, Advertising, and Cloud, has grown 27% in the 2021 fiscal year. Over time, it could become a key profitability driver, growing to more than $100 billion by 2024, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>随着硬件采用率的增长，苹果的服务业务也在增长。该部门包括苹果TV+、音乐、News+、AppleCare、广告和云等服务，在2021财年增长了27%。Nispel表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会成为关键的盈利驱动力，到2024年将增长到1000亿美元以上。</blockquote></p><p> Nispel recognized that Apple’s App Store legal battles were concerning, but were “likely more a bend, not break outcome.” The company has had to make modest changes to its App Store guidance in response to court rulings and regulatory changes, including lowering its commission for some developers. It will likely make more concessions over time, such as allowing developers to provide third-party payment options, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔承认，苹果的应用商店法律诉讼令人担忧，但“可能更多的是一个转变，而不是突破的结果”。该公司不得不对其应用商店指南进行适度修改，以应对法院裁决和监管变化，包括降低一些开发者的佣金。尼斯佩尔表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会做出更多让步，例如允许开发商提供第三方支付选项。</blockquote></p><p> “We expect regulation to take time to implement, and believe Apple’s competitive advantage is unlikely to be substantially harmed,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“我们预计监管需要时间来实施，并相信苹果的竞争优势不太可能受到实质性损害，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-aapl-stock-attractive-buy-51638798446?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-aapl-stock-attractive-buy-51638798446?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107494736","content_text":"Apple shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the stock with a bullish outlook, citing growth in the tech giant’s services segment.\nAnalyst Brandon Nispel rated the stock Overweight with a $191 price target. The target presents an 18% increase from Apple’s (ticker: AAPL) $161.84 closing price on Friday. The stock was up 1.2% to $163.73 in premarket trading Monday.\nOf the 42 analysts covering the stock surveyed by FactSet, 32 have it at a Buy or Overweight rating, nine rated it at Hold, and one rated it Underweight.\n“While AAPL is expensive by historical valuations, we find AAPL attractive relative to other mega-caps,” Nispel wrote on Monday.\nThe analyst outlined three main reasons for his bullish take. Nispel doesn’t believe iPhone unit sales have peaked, with the 5G upgrade cycle potentially pushing Apple past its current peak; he believes the company has managed to increase its product breadth to reduce reliability on iPhone sales; and he foresees services to grow at rates multiple times faster than user growth.\nThe analyst forecasts Apple to have 1.09 billion active iPhones and 1.8 billion active installed devices by the end of the first quarter of the 2022 fiscal year. This presents a 7% and 8% year-over-year increase, respectively.\n“This shows a healthy growing user base where Apple iPhone market share is low relative to key geographies outside the United States,” Nispel wrote. “As the installed base grows, a larger base can support more sales on lower upgrade rates.”\nApple’s international segment is likely to grow faster in the coming years as other countries adapt to 5G, prompting a wave of upgrades to compatible hardware, Nispel wrote. He estimates every 1% increase in 5G upgrade rates could drive an incremental 11 million iPhone unit sales.\nAs hardware adoption grows, so does Apple’s services business. The segment, which includes services such as Apple TV+, Music, News+, AppleCare, Advertising, and Cloud, has grown 27% in the 2021 fiscal year. Over time, it could become a key profitability driver, growing to more than $100 billion by 2024, Nispel said.\nNispel recognized that Apple’s App Store legal battles were concerning, but were “likely more a bend, not break outcome.” The company has had to make modest changes to its App Store guidance in response to court rulings and regulatory changes, including lowering its commission for some developers. It will likely make more concessions over time, such as allowing developers to provide third-party payment options, Nispel said.\n“We expect regulation to take time to implement, and believe Apple’s competitive advantage is unlikely to be substantially harmed,” he added.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":572,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":696502281,"gmtCreate":1640721684432,"gmtModify":1640721684566,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks for sharing ...[LOL]&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks for sharing ...[LOL]&nbsp;","text":"Thanks for sharing ...[LOL]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696502281","repostId":"1172682878","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172682878","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640704390,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172682878?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-28 23:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172682878","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbas","content":"<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBlockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-28 23:13</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","SOS":"SOS Limited","CAN":"嘉楠科技","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","MARA":"MARA Holdings","EBON":"亿邦国际","BTBT":"Bit Digital, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172682878","content_text":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbase, Canaan, SOS Ltd and Ebang International fell between 3% and 8%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"COIN":0.9,"RIOT":0.9,"BTBT":0.9,"CAN":0.9,"MARA":0.9,"SOS":0.9,"EBON":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":908,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823503709,"gmtCreate":1633646262338,"gmtModify":1633646262439,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tnx","listText":"Tnx","text":"Tnx","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823503709","repostId":"1139177986","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139177986","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1633646165,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1139177986?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-08 06:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla moves headquarters from California to Texas<blockquote>特斯拉将总部从加州迁至德克萨斯</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139177986","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla is moving its headquarters from Palo Alto, California, to Austin, Texas, CEO Elon Musk announc","content":"<p>Tesla&nbsp;is moving its headquarters from Palo Alto, California, to Austin, Texas, CEO Elon Musk announced at the company's shareholder meeting on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk周四在公司股东大会上宣布，将把总部从加州Palo Alto迁至德克萨斯Austin。</blockquote></p><p> The meeting took place at Tesla's vehicle assembly plant&nbsp;under construction&nbsp;outside of Austin on a property that borders the Colorado River, near the city's airport.</p><p><blockquote>会议在奥斯汀郊外正在建设的特斯拉汽车装配厂举行，该工厂毗邻科罗拉多河，靠近该市机场。</blockquote></p><p> However, the company plans to increase production in its California plant regardless of the headquarters move.</p><p><blockquote>然而，无论总部搬迁如何，该公司都计划提高加州工厂的产量。</blockquote></p><p> \"To be clear we will be continuing to expand our activities in California,\" Musk said. \"Our intention is to increase output from Fremont and Giga Nevada by 50%. If you go to our Fremont factory it's jammed.\"</p><p><blockquote>“需要明确的是，我们将继续扩大在加州的活动，”马斯克说。“我们的目的是将弗里蒙特和Giga Nevada的产量增加50%。如果你去我们的弗里蒙特工厂，那里就会堵塞。”</blockquote></p><p> But, he added, \"It's tough for people to afford houses, and people have to come in from far away....There's a limit to how big you can scale in the Bay Area.\"</p><p><blockquote>但是，他补充说，“人们很难买得起房子，人们不得不从很远的地方进来....在湾区，你的规模是有限的。”</blockquote></p><p> Regarding the plant underway in Austin, he noted that it would take some time to reach full production even after it's completed.</p><p><blockquote>关于奥斯汀正在建设的工厂，他指出，即使建成后，也需要一段时间才能达到全面生产。</blockquote></p><p> Musk’s growing dissatisfaction with California has been apparent for some time. In April 2020, on a&nbsp;Tesla earnings call, Musk lashed out at California government officials calling their temporary Covid-related health orders “fascist” in an expletive-laced rant.</p><p><blockquote>一段时间以来，马斯克对加州日益增长的不满已经很明显。2020年4月，在特斯拉财报看涨期权上，马斯克猛烈抨击加州政府官员，称他们与新冠病毒相关的临时健康命令是“法西斯”。</blockquote></p><p> Later, Musk&nbsp;personally relocated&nbsp;to the Austin area from Los Angeles, where he had lived for two decades.</p><p><blockquote>后来，马斯克亲自从居住了二十年的洛杉矶搬到了奥斯汀地区。</blockquote></p><p> Doing so enabled Musk, who is also CEO of aerospace company SpaceX, to reduce his personal tax burden and be closer to a SpaceX launch site in Boca Chica, Texas.</p><p><blockquote>这样做使兼任航空航天公司SpaceX首席执行官的马斯克减轻了个人税务负担，并离SpaceX位于德克萨斯州博卡奇卡的发射场更近。</blockquote></p><p> California levies some of the highest personal income taxes in the country on its wealthy residents, but Texas has no personal income tax.</p><p><blockquote>加州对其富裕居民征收全国最高的个人所得税，但德克萨斯州没有个人所得税。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla is not the first company to its headquarters out of California to Texas. Oracle and Hewlett Packard are among the tech giants who decided to make that move last year, for example.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉并不是第一家将总部从加州搬到德克萨斯的公司。例如，甲骨文和惠普是去年决定采取这一举措的科技巨头之一。</blockquote></p><p> Texas has been actively recruiting companies via its Texas Economic Development Act offering tax breaks to put new facilities in the state. Austin, with a top tech university and cultural events like South by Southwest, is a draw for tech employers.</p><p><blockquote>德克萨斯州一直在通过其《德克萨斯州经济发展法案》积极招募公司，该法案提供税收减免，以便在该州建设新设施。奥斯汀拥有一所顶尖的科技大学和西南偏南等文化活动，对科技雇主很有吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla has generally garnered a huge amount of support from the state of California since it was founded there in 2003. It has enjoyed grant funding, tax breaks, incentives and favorable policies from the likes of the California Air Resources Board, California Energy Commission and&nbsp;California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, among others.</p><p><blockquote>自2003年在加州成立以来，特斯拉总体上获得了加州的大力支持。它享受了加州空气资源委员会、加州能源委员会和加州替代能源和先进交通融资管理局等机构的拨款、税收减免、激励措施和优惠政策。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla moves headquarters from California to Texas<blockquote>特斯拉将总部从加州迁至德克萨斯</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla moves headquarters from California to Texas<blockquote>特斯拉将总部从加州迁至德克萨斯</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-10-08 06:36</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla&nbsp;is moving its headquarters from Palo Alto, California, to Austin, Texas, CEO Elon Musk announced at the company's shareholder meeting on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk周四在公司股东大会上宣布，将把总部从加州Palo Alto迁至德克萨斯Austin。</blockquote></p><p> The meeting took place at Tesla's vehicle assembly plant&nbsp;under construction&nbsp;outside of Austin on a property that borders the Colorado River, near the city's airport.</p><p><blockquote>会议在奥斯汀郊外正在建设的特斯拉汽车装配厂举行，该工厂毗邻科罗拉多河，靠近该市机场。</blockquote></p><p> However, the company plans to increase production in its California plant regardless of the headquarters move.</p><p><blockquote>然而，无论总部搬迁如何，该公司都计划提高加州工厂的产量。</blockquote></p><p> \"To be clear we will be continuing to expand our activities in California,\" Musk said. \"Our intention is to increase output from Fremont and Giga Nevada by 50%. If you go to our Fremont factory it's jammed.\"</p><p><blockquote>“需要明确的是，我们将继续扩大在加州的活动，”马斯克说。“我们的目的是将弗里蒙特和Giga Nevada的产量增加50%。如果你去我们的弗里蒙特工厂，那里就会堵塞。”</blockquote></p><p> But, he added, \"It's tough for people to afford houses, and people have to come in from far away....There's a limit to how big you can scale in the Bay Area.\"</p><p><blockquote>但是，他补充说，“人们很难买得起房子，人们不得不从很远的地方进来....在湾区，你的规模是有限的。”</blockquote></p><p> Regarding the plant underway in Austin, he noted that it would take some time to reach full production even after it's completed.</p><p><blockquote>关于奥斯汀正在建设的工厂，他指出，即使建成后，也需要一段时间才能达到全面生产。</blockquote></p><p> Musk’s growing dissatisfaction with California has been apparent for some time. In April 2020, on a&nbsp;Tesla earnings call, Musk lashed out at California government officials calling their temporary Covid-related health orders “fascist” in an expletive-laced rant.</p><p><blockquote>一段时间以来，马斯克对加州日益增长的不满已经很明显。2020年4月，在特斯拉财报看涨期权上，马斯克猛烈抨击加州政府官员，称他们与新冠病毒相关的临时健康命令是“法西斯”。</blockquote></p><p> Later, Musk&nbsp;personally relocated&nbsp;to the Austin area from Los Angeles, where he had lived for two decades.</p><p><blockquote>后来，马斯克亲自从居住了二十年的洛杉矶搬到了奥斯汀地区。</blockquote></p><p> Doing so enabled Musk, who is also CEO of aerospace company SpaceX, to reduce his personal tax burden and be closer to a SpaceX launch site in Boca Chica, Texas.</p><p><blockquote>这样做使兼任航空航天公司SpaceX首席执行官的马斯克减轻了个人税务负担，并离SpaceX位于德克萨斯州博卡奇卡的发射场更近。</blockquote></p><p> California levies some of the highest personal income taxes in the country on its wealthy residents, but Texas has no personal income tax.</p><p><blockquote>加州对其富裕居民征收全国最高的个人所得税，但德克萨斯州没有个人所得税。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla is not the first company to its headquarters out of California to Texas. Oracle and Hewlett Packard are among the tech giants who decided to make that move last year, for example.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉并不是第一家将总部从加州搬到德克萨斯的公司。例如，甲骨文和惠普是去年决定采取这一举措的科技巨头之一。</blockquote></p><p> Texas has been actively recruiting companies via its Texas Economic Development Act offering tax breaks to put new facilities in the state. Austin, with a top tech university and cultural events like South by Southwest, is a draw for tech employers.</p><p><blockquote>德克萨斯州一直在通过其《德克萨斯州经济发展法案》积极招募公司，该法案提供税收减免，以便在该州建设新设施。奥斯汀拥有一所顶尖的科技大学和西南偏南等文化活动，对科技雇主很有吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla has generally garnered a huge amount of support from the state of California since it was founded there in 2003. It has enjoyed grant funding, tax breaks, incentives and favorable policies from the likes of the California Air Resources Board, California Energy Commission and&nbsp;California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, among others.</p><p><blockquote>自2003年在加州成立以来，特斯拉总体上获得了加州的大力支持。它享受了加州空气资源委员会、加州能源委员会和加州替代能源和先进交通融资管理局等机构的拨款、税收减免、激励措施和优惠政策。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139177986","content_text":"Tesla is moving its headquarters from Palo Alto, California, to Austin, Texas, CEO Elon Musk announced at the company's shareholder meeting on Thursday.\nThe meeting took place at Tesla's vehicle assembly plant under construction outside of Austin on a property that borders the Colorado River, near the city's airport.\nHowever, the company plans to increase production in its California plant regardless of the headquarters move.\n\"To be clear we will be continuing to expand our activities in California,\" Musk said. \"Our intention is to increase output from Fremont and Giga Nevada by 50%. If you go to our Fremont factory it's jammed.\"\nBut, he added, \"It's tough for people to afford houses, and people have to come in from far away....There's a limit to how big you can scale in the Bay Area.\"\nRegarding the plant underway in Austin, he noted that it would take some time to reach full production even after it's completed.\nMusk’s growing dissatisfaction with California has been apparent for some time. In April 2020, on a Tesla earnings call, Musk lashed out at California government officials calling their temporary Covid-related health orders “fascist” in an expletive-laced rant.\nLater, Musk personally relocated to the Austin area from Los Angeles, where he had lived for two decades.\nDoing so enabled Musk, who is also CEO of aerospace company SpaceX, to reduce his personal tax burden and be closer to a SpaceX launch site in Boca Chica, Texas.\nCalifornia levies some of the highest personal income taxes in the country on its wealthy residents, but Texas has no personal income tax.\nTesla is not the first company to its headquarters out of California to Texas. Oracle and Hewlett Packard are among the tech giants who decided to make that move last year, for example.\nTexas has been actively recruiting companies via its Texas Economic Development Act offering tax breaks to put new facilities in the state. Austin, with a top tech university and cultural events like South by Southwest, is a draw for tech employers.\nTesla has generally garnered a huge amount of support from the state of California since it was founded there in 2003. It has enjoyed grant funding, tax breaks, incentives and favorable policies from the likes of the California Air Resources Board, California Energy Commission and California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, among others.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":557,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":809995752,"gmtCreate":1627343137176,"gmtModify":1633766003495,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stay cool","listText":"Stay cool","text":"Stay cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/809995752","repostId":"2154964378","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":696502534,"gmtCreate":1640721693131,"gmtModify":1640721693259,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696502534","repostId":"1172682878","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172682878","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640704390,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172682878?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-28 23:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172682878","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbas","content":"<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Blockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBlockchain Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-28 23:13</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital,&nbsp;Bit&nbsp;Digital,&nbsp;Riot Blockchain,&nbsp;Coinbase,&nbsp;Canaan,&nbsp;SOS Ltd&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ebang International&nbsp;fell&nbsp;between 3% and 8%.</p><p><blockquote>区块链股票早盘下跌。Marathon Digital、Bit Digital、Riot Blockchain、Coinbase、Canaan、SOS Ltd和亿邦国际跌幅在3%至8%之间。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d11548e5ec535c997a2f86f9c063122\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","SOS":"SOS Limited","CAN":"嘉楠科技","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","MARA":"MARA Holdings","EBON":"亿邦国际","BTBT":"Bit Digital, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172682878","content_text":"Blockchain stocks dropped in morning trading.Marathon Digital, Bit Digital, Riot Blockchain, Coinbase, Canaan, SOS Ltd and Ebang International fell between 3% and 8%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"COIN":0.9,"RIOT":0.9,"BTBT":0.9,"CAN":0.9,"MARA":0.9,"SOS":0.9,"EBON":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":609,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604254917,"gmtCreate":1639406523859,"gmtModify":1639406523987,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604254917","repostId":"1167465214","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1167465214","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639406352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1167465214?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 22:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share<blockquote>辉瑞以100美元/股收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，早盘股价上涨逾80%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167465214","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.Pfi","content":"<p>Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baca4cde05c414b1c77aa618108489b1\" tg-width=\"774\" tg-height=\"568\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Pfizer Inc has agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal to expand its cancer and inflammatory disease treatment pipeline, the companies said on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞(Pfizer)以每股100美元的价格收购了Arena Pharmaceuticals，该公司在早盘交易中股价上涨了80%以上。辉瑞公司周一表示，已同意以67亿美元的全现金交易收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，以扩大其癌症和炎症性疾病治疗产品线。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer will take over all outstanding shares of Arena for $100 per share, representing a 100.2% premium to Arena's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞将以每股100美元的价格收购Arena的所有流通股，较Arena最后收盘价溢价100.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Arena is developing several treatments for gastroenterology, dermatology, and cardiology. The drug developer's ulcerative colitis treatment candidate, etrasimod, is in a late-stage study.</p><p><blockquote>Arena正在为胃肠病学、皮肤病学和心脏病学开发几种治疗方法。该药物开发商的溃疡性结肠炎治疗候选药物etrasimod正处于后期研究阶段。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer said it expects to finance the transaction with cash on hand.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞表示，预计将用手头现金为此次交易提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer’s financial advisers for the transaction are BofA Securities and Centerview Partners LLC, while Guggenheim Securities LLC and Evercore Group LLC advised Arena.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞此次交易的财务顾问是美国银行证券和Centerview Partners LLC，而古根海姆证券有限责任公司和Evercore Group LLC为Arena提供咨询。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share<blockquote>辉瑞以100美元/股收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，早盘股价上涨逾80%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nArena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share<blockquote>辉瑞以100美元/股收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，早盘股价上涨逾80%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-13 22:39</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baca4cde05c414b1c77aa618108489b1\" tg-width=\"774\" tg-height=\"568\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Pfizer Inc has agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal to expand its cancer and inflammatory disease treatment pipeline, the companies said on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞(Pfizer)以每股100美元的价格收购了Arena Pharmaceuticals，该公司在早盘交易中股价上涨了80%以上。辉瑞公司周一表示，已同意以67亿美元的全现金交易收购Arena Pharmaceuticals，以扩大其癌症和炎症性疾病治疗产品线。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer will take over all outstanding shares of Arena for $100 per share, representing a 100.2% premium to Arena's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞将以每股100美元的价格收购Arena的所有流通股，较Arena最后收盘价溢价100.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Arena is developing several treatments for gastroenterology, dermatology, and cardiology. The drug developer's ulcerative colitis treatment candidate, etrasimod, is in a late-stage study.</p><p><blockquote>Arena正在为胃肠病学、皮肤病学和心脏病学开发几种治疗方法。该药物开发商的溃疡性结肠炎治疗候选药物etrasimod正处于后期研究阶段。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer said it expects to finance the transaction with cash on hand.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞表示，预计将用手头现金为此次交易提供资金。</blockquote></p><p> Pfizer’s financial advisers for the transaction are BofA Securities and Centerview Partners LLC, while Guggenheim Securities LLC and Evercore Group LLC advised Arena.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞此次交易的财务顾问是美国银行证券和Centerview Partners LLC，而古根海姆证券有限责任公司和Evercore Group LLC为Arena提供咨询。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARNA":"阿里那","PFE":"辉瑞"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167465214","content_text":"Arena Pharmaceuticals jumped over 80% in morning trading as Pfizer acquired it for US $100/share.Pfizer Inc has agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal to expand its cancer and inflammatory disease treatment pipeline, the companies said on Monday.\nPfizer will take over all outstanding shares of Arena for $100 per share, representing a 100.2% premium to Arena's last closing price.\nArena is developing several treatments for gastroenterology, dermatology, and cardiology. The drug developer's ulcerative colitis treatment candidate, etrasimod, is in a late-stage study.\nPfizer said it expects to finance the transaction with cash on hand.\nPfizer’s financial advisers for the transaction are BofA Securities and Centerview Partners LLC, while Guggenheim Securities LLC and Evercore Group LLC advised Arena.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PFE":0.9,"ARNA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":919,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141121,"gmtCreate":1640884573871,"gmtModify":1640884573967,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Shoppe","listText":"Shoppe","text":"Shoppe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141121","repostId":"1106092668","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106092668","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640876653,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106092668?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 23:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Shares Jumped More Than 4% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨逾4%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106092668","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.Also Read:Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Unde","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨超过4%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/448dcc7d589843674730e046aa6ef96a\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>Also Read:</b><b>Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Understand The Recent Selloff</b></p><p><blockquote><b>另请阅读：</b><b>Sea Limited：深入了解最近的抛售</b></blockquote></p><p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Sea Limited is a highly diversified business firing on all cylinders in some of the fastest-growing economies in the world.</li><li>I dive into each of its segments to understand the recent selloff and justify the current valuation.</li><li>I consider Sea one of my ten highest conviction investments.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa5cbe0a30acc723a2c6f62300024002\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Sea Limited是一家高度多元化的企业，在世界上一些增长最快的经济体中全力以赴。</li><li>我深入研究了它的每个细分市场，以了解最近的抛售并证明当前估值的合理性。</li><li>我认为Sea是我最有信心的十项投资之一。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>kokkai/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>论文</b></blockquote></p><p>A by-parts analysis of Sea Limited&#39;s (NYSE:SE) segments shows that its current valuation is roughly fair, but there are many long-term growth drivers that could surprise to the upside and drive very strong returns for years to come.</p><p><blockquote>对Sea Limited（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SE）部门的细分分析表明，其目前的估值大致公平，但有许多长期增长动力可能会出人意料地上涨，并在未来几年推动非常强劲的回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Introduction</b></p><p><blockquote><b>介绍</b></blockquote></p><p>I recently wrote an article highlighting my top 10 stock picks for 2022. I&#39;d already done an in-depth analysis of my other nine picks in other Seeking Alpha articles, so I thought it would be good to close out the year with an article about Sea.</p><p><blockquote>我最近写了一篇文章，重点介绍了我选择的2022年十大股票。我已经在其他Seeking Alpha文章中对我的其他九个选择进行了深入分析，所以我认为最好以一篇关于Sea的文章来结束这一年。</blockquote></p><p>Furthermore, with shares down significantly over the past couple of months (but still slightly up for the year), I believe this article may prove timely. I don&#39;t speculate on short-term market movements, but I personally added to my Sea shares recently. It&#39;s one of my only losing positions that I didn&#39;t sell out of temporarily for tax-loss harvesting, and in this article, I will explain why Sea is such a high conviction holding for me.</p><p><blockquote>此外，由于过去几个月股价大幅下跌（但今年仍略有上涨），我相信这篇文章可能是及时的。我不推测短期市场走势，但我个人最近增持了Sea股票。这是我唯一没有为了收获税收损失而暂时卖出的亏损头寸之一，在本文中，我将解释为什么Sea对我来说是如此坚定的持有。</blockquote></p><p>It&#39;s also worth noting that many professional investors seem to share this opinion. Sea is the 121st largest company in the world, but it&#39;s the16thmost popular holding among hedge funds. This implies that big money is overweight Sea, with 71% of shares held by institutions.</p><p><blockquote>还值得注意的是，许多专业投资者似乎也认同这一观点。Sea是全球第121大公司，但在对冲基金中排名第16位。这暗示大资金是跑赢大盘海，71%的股份被机构持有。</blockquote></p><p>Because Sea operates in many different areas, I will do a separate analysis of each of its operating segments to justify its current valuation and explain how that valuation could drive unexpectedly strong returns for years.</p><p><blockquote>由于Sea在许多不同的领域开展业务，我将对其每个运营部门进行单独分析，以证明其当前估值的合理性，并解释该估值如何在多年来推动意想不到的强劲回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gaming</b></p><p><blockquote><b>游戏</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea Limited&#39;s gaming segment Garena is best known for Free Fire, a mobile battle royale game that was developed in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Sea Limited的游戏部门Garena因其内部开发的移动大逃杀游戏《Free Fire》而闻名。</blockquote></p><p>The game was released in 2017 and has been very popular ever since. It currently has the second most monthly active users among all Android games globally. The game is available worldwide, but it&#39;s particularly popular in emerging markets like SEA, LATAM, and India, where it&#39;s been the highest-grossing mobile game for over two years.</p><p><blockquote>该游戏于2017年发布，此后一直非常受欢迎。它目前在全球所有安卓游戏中拥有第二大月活跃用户。这款游戏在全球范围内都有售，但在东南亚、拉美和印度等新兴市场尤其受欢迎，两年多来，它一直是这些市场票房最高的手机游戏。</blockquote></p><p>With the game having been popular for a long time already, there&#39;s some concern that gamers will move on to the next big thing. Although there are some mobile games that are older than Free Fire and still very popular - like Roblox, Clash of Clans, and Pokemon Go - there are many more that have been forgotten. Until Garena releases more games and proves that it can be successful with them too, there will always be questions about whether its studio is a one-hit wonder.</p><p><blockquote>随着这款游戏已经流行了很长时间，有人担心游戏玩家会转向下一件大事。虽然有一些手机游戏比Free Fire更古老，但仍然非常受欢迎——如Roblox、Clash of Clans和Pokemon Go——但还有更多已经被遗忘。在Garena发布更多游戏并证明它也可以在这些游戏上取得成功之前，总会有人质疑它的工作室是否是一个昙花一现的奇迹。</blockquote></p><p>Regardless, Garena is a critical part of Sea because it&#39;s the only profitable segment and it doubles a social platform that provides free advertising for Sea&#39;s non-gaming products. Cross-promotion is a huge competitive advantage for Sea.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，Garena是Sea的重要组成部分，因为它是唯一盈利的细分市场，并且它是为Sea非游戏产品提供免费广告的社交平台的两倍。交叉推广是Sea的巨大竞争优势。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, one reason for Sea&#39;s recent selloff could be the Q4 guidance implied for Garena.</p><p><blockquote>因此，Sea最近抛售的原因之一可能是Garena暗示的第四季度指引。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e299727cc28a887a36d88831aec8f53\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"334\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Earnings Call Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：看涨期权收益演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>In Q2 this year, Garena raised its guidance to $4.5B-$4.7B for 2021 bookings (up from $4.3B-$4.5B). With the first three quarters already totaling $3.5B, this implies that Q4 bookings will come in at $1.0B-$1.2B, up between 0% and 20% year over year, and likely down sequentially. This is compared to 29% growth in the most recent quarter and 44% projected growth for the full year.</p><p><blockquote>今年第二季度，Garena将2021年预订量的指导上调至45亿美元至47亿美元（高于43亿美元至45亿美元）。由于前三个季度的总预订量已经达到$3.5 B，这意味着第四季度的预订量将达到$1.0 B-$1.2 B，同比增长0%至20%，并且可能会环比下降。相比之下，最近一个季度的增长率为29%，全年预计增长率为44%。</blockquote></p><p>While 20% isn&#39;t a terrible deceleration, 0% certainly is. Even 20% growth isn&#39;t spectacular compared to the historic levels. At the 10% midpoint, Garena&#39;s growth looks more similar to that of a mature company like Activision (NASDAQ:ATVI) or Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) than a fast-growing company like Roblox (NYSE:RBLX).</p><p><blockquote>虽然20%并不是一个可怕的减速，但0%肯定是。与历史水平相比，即使是20%的增长也并不引人注目。在10%的中点，Garena的增长看起来更类似于动视暴雪（纳斯达克股票代码：ATVI）或Zynga（纳斯达克股票代码：ZNGA）等成熟公司，而不是Roblox（纽约证券交易所股票代码：RBLX）等快速增长的公司。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Garena&#39;s implied valuation should - and did - suffer as a result. While a fast-growing company like Roblox can command a high double-digit P/S multiple, Activision and Zynga trade at an average P/S multiple of just 4. Garena is slightly more profitable than them and probably has more risk to the upside, so I&#39;ll use a P/S multiple of 5 for my implied valuation. This implies a P/E of about 10 for a business growing at around 10%, which is very reasonable in today&#39;s market.</p><p><blockquote>Garena的隐含估值应该——也确实——因此受到影响。虽然像Roblox这样快速增长的公司可以获得两位数的高市盈率，但动视暴雪和Zynga的平均市盈率仅为4倍。Garena的利润比他们略高，而且可能有更大的上行风险，因此我将使用市盈率倍数5作为我的隐含估值。这意味着一家增长率在10%左右的企业的市盈率约为10，这在当今市场上是非常合理的。</blockquote></p><p>This means Garena is worth $23.5B based on the high end of management&#39;s guidance.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着根据管理层指导的高端，Garena的价值为235亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>I believe this valuation is actually conservative for a few reasons:</p><p><blockquote>我相信这个估值实际上是保守的，原因有几个：</blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Next year has tough comps and growth could re-accelerate in the following years or even next year, especially if Garena releases a new hit game. The growth rate past next quarter is not based on explicit guidance from the company, only industry forecasts.</li><li>The peer valuations I used are from companies also trading at the lower end of their valuation range for the past year.</li><li>Garena has a good track record and is continuing to invest in Free Fire. One example of this is the recently released Free Fire MAX, which improves the experience for users with higher-end phones and even adds a metaverse-like customizable map called Craftland. To me, this implies that Garena believes Free Fire is still in the earlier part of its lifecycle.</li><li>Although I&#39;d obviously prefer that Garena develops more games in house, in the meantime it&#39;s still not a one-trick pony. In addition to Free Fire, Garena distributes games from third-party developers like Tencent (OTCMKTS:OTCPK:TCEHY). These are popular titles like League of Legends and Call of Duty, which meaningfully diversify Garena&#39;s revenue.</li></ul><b>E-Commerce</b></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>明年的竞争很艰难，增长可能会在接下来的几年甚至明年重新加速，特别是如果Garena发布一款新的热门游戏。下个季度的增长率不是基于公司的明确指导，而是基于行业预测。</li><li>我使用的同行估值来自去年交易价格也处于估值范围下限的公司。</li><li>Garena拥有良好的业绩记录，并将继续投资Free Fire。这方面的一个例子是最近发布的Free Fire MAX，它改善了高端手机用户的体验，甚至添加了一个类似元宇宙的可定制地图，称为Craftland。对我来说，这意味着Garena认为Free Fire仍处于其生命周期的早期阶段。</li><li>虽然我显然更希望Garena在内部开发更多的游戏，但与此同时，它仍然不是一匹只会一招的小马。除了Free Fire之外，Garena还发行腾讯控股(OTCMKTS：OTCPK：TCEHY)等第三方开发商的游戏。这些都是像《英雄联盟》和《使命看涨期权》这样受欢迎的游戏，它们有意义地使Garena的收入多样化。</li></ul><b>电子商务</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea&#39;s e-commerce platform Shopee is currently its big growth driver. This platform is often considered the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) of Southeast Asia, and it recently expanded into more markets including Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>Sea的电子商务平台Shopee目前是其最大的增长动力。该平台通常被认为是东南亚的亚马逊（纳斯达克：AMZN），最近它扩展到包括巴西在内的更多市场。</blockquote></p><p>There&#39;s always some debate about who is really the Amazon of a region. Shopee certainly has competition, including from Alibaba&#39;s (NYSE:BABA) Lazada, Tokopedia in Indonesia, MercadoLibre (MELI) in Brazil, and even Amazon itself. With most of the competition being private or tucked away into a larger company, many of the competitors don&#39;t publish exact revenue numbers, which makes it difficult to measure the competition. Even Sea hasn&#39;t published explicit revenue numbers for some countries like Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>关于谁是一个地区真正的亚马逊，总是有一些争论。Shopee当然面临竞争，包括来自阿里巴巴-SW(NYSE：BABA)的Lazada、印尼的Tokopedia、巴西的MercadoLibre(MELI)，甚至Amazon本身。由于大多数竞争都是私人的或隐藏在更大的公司中，许多竞争对手不会公布确切的收入数字，这使得衡量竞争变得困难。就连Sea也没有公布巴西等一些国家的明确收入数据。</blockquote></p><p>One neutral source that can be assessed is the Alexa site rank, which as its name suggests ranks sites by their popularity. Keep in mind that these are ranks, so a lower score is better.</p><p><blockquote>一个可以评估的中立来源是Alexa网站排名，顾名思义，它根据网站的受欢迎程度对网站进行排名。请记住，这些都是排名，所以分数越低越好。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/180367a2b64bccebf243c5b6d8fb776a\" tg-width=\"455\" tg-height=\"353\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from Alexa</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自Alexa</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shopee is very mobile-focused, but the above table only considers the website. To check App Store app ranks for the shopping category, we can use App Annie.</p><p><blockquote>Shopee非常专注于移动，但上表只考虑了网站。要查看购物类别的App Store应用排名，我们可以使用App Annie。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6544f014a5d70d13ee14dab0ac8b6782\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"403\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from AppAnnie</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自AppAnnie</span></p></blockquote></p><p>On the mobile side, there&#39;s no need to look at the competition because Shopee is consistently the number one shopping app in every country listed. In a mobile-first world, this bodes very well. Even on the web side, Shopee wins out except in a few specific regions like LATAM and (barely) Indonesia, which have more local competitors.</p><p><blockquote>在移动端，没有必要关注竞争，因为Shopee一直是每个国家排名第一的购物应用。在移动优先的世界里，这是个好兆头。即使在网络方面，Shopee也胜出，除了拉丁美洲和（勉强）印度尼西亚等少数特定地区，这些地区有更多的本地竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p>Of course, traffic doesn&#39;t always translate to GMV. But for a shopping app where most people will use the app to buy something, it&#39;s a decent proxy. A third party estimates that Shopee accounts for57%of all e-commerce in Southeast Asia. It&#39;s Shopee&#39;s dominance in the mobile app ranks and market share that make me consider it the Amazon of Southeast Asia.</p><p><blockquote>当然，流量并不总是转化为GMV。但对于一个大多数人都会使用该应用程序购买东西的购物应用程序来说，这是一个不错的代理。第三方估计Shopee占东南亚所有电子商务的57%。正是Shopee在移动应用排名和市场份额方面的主导地位让我认为它是东南亚的亚马逊。</blockquote></p><p>So why would a company with so much potential sell off?</p><p><blockquote>那么，为什么一家潜力如此之大的公司会抛售呢？</blockquote></p><p>After the recent earnings report, some analysts expressed concern that Shopee is branching out into other countries like Poland and Mexico before validating its business model in the current markets. In these countries, Shopee has less of a presence; it&#39;s bounced between the 3-5 spots on the Mexico App Store for shopping apps, and between spots 1 and 3 in Poland. Although analysts hate uncertainty - and the CEO&#39;s comments that they don&#39;t have a concrete measure of success in these earlier stage countries won&#39;t help with that - Shopee has a history of entering new countries successfully and I am willing to give management some time to try expanding more. After all, if they&#39;re successful, then it could drive even more unexpected growth in the future.</p><p><blockquote>在最近的财报发布后，一些分析师对Shopee在当前市场验证其商业模式之前将业务扩展到波兰和墨西哥等其他国家表示担忧。在这些国家，Shopee的影响力较小；它在墨西哥应用商店购物应用的3-5位之间波动，在波兰的1-3位之间波动。尽管分析师讨厌不确定性——而且首席执行官关于他们在这些早期国家没有具体的成功衡量标准的评论对此没有帮助——但Shopee有着成功进入新国家的历史，我愿意给管理层一些时间尝试进一步扩张。毕竟，如果他们成功了，那么它可能会在未来推动更多意想不到的增长。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Another complaint from analysts was that the basket size (average purchase size) is trending down. While that could also have contributed to the recent selloff, it&#39;s hard to complain when the overall sales increased a lot despite a decrease in basket size.</p><p><blockquote>分析师的另一个抱怨是篮子规模（平均购买规模）呈下降趋势。虽然这也可能导致了最近的抛售，但尽管篮子规模有所下降，但当整体销售额大幅增长时，很难抱怨。</blockquote></p><p>The company raised its guidance for e-commerce again in Q3, now guiding for $5.0B-$5.2B in 2021 e-commerce revenue. That&#39;s 75%-100% growth in Q4 and about 135% growth for the year. These are much more exciting numbers than the gaming side, although the guidance still implies a slight deceleration in Q4. But compared to Amazon&#39;s $340B in 2020 e-commerce sales, Shopee looks like it&#39;s just scratched the surface. E-commerce is at only11%penetration in Southeast Asia compared to18.7%in the USA, and Southeast Asia economies are generally growing faster than the USA&#39;s.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在第三季度再次上调了电子商务指引，目前预计2021年电子商务收入为$5.0 B-$5.2 B。第四季度增长75%-100%，全年增长约135%。这些数字比游戏方面更令人兴奋，尽管指导仍然意味着第四季度略有减速。但与亚马逊2020年3400亿美元的电子商务销售额相比，Shopee看起来只是触及了表面。电子商务在东南亚的渗透率仅为11%，而美国为18.7%，东南亚经济体的增长速度普遍高于美国。</blockquote></p><p>Despite being in a blue skies industry, it&#39;s more difficult to value the e-commerce segment because it operates at a loss (whereas the gaming segment is highly profitable). Shopee&#39;s success is not guaranteed because it&#39;s not clear at this point whether the platform can become profitable while retaining its market share. Stocks like this tend to experience more volatility, which could partially explain the recent selloff.</p><p><blockquote>尽管处于蓝天行业，但对电子商务部门进行估值更加困难，因为它处于亏损状态（而游戏部门利润丰厚）。Shopee的成功并不能保证，因为目前尚不清楚该平台能否在保持市场份额的同时实现盈利。像这样的股票往往会经历更大的波动，这可以部分解释最近的抛售。</blockquote></p><p>For unprofitable software companies, I like to use the Rule of 40 to assess the business. But it&#39;s difficult to apply this rule to a more cyclical e-commerce company with naturally lower margins. Even so, it&#39;s worth noting that despite being unprofitable, Sea&#39;s Rule of 40 score of 104 is better than most SaaS companies&#39;, and also better than e-commerce peers Amazon (21), MercadoLibre (73), and Alibaba (43).</p><p><blockquote>对于不盈利的软件公司，我喜欢用40法则来评估业务。但很难将这一规则应用于利润率自然较低、周期性较强的电子商务公司。即便如此，值得注意的是，尽管没有盈利，Sea的40分（104分）优于大多数SaaS公司，也优于电子商务同行Amazon（21分）、MercadoLibre（73分）和阿里巴巴-SW（43分）。</blockquote></p><p>To understand Shopee&#39;s terminal valuation once it becomes profitable, we can look at industry peers. Amazon is one profitable and slower-growing peer, and it trades at 4x P/S. AWS pushes this number up, but Amazon&#39;s high exposure to first-party sales offsets that. Other e-commerce marketplace peers trade at similar valuations: Alibaba at 3x P/S, MercadoLibre at 9x P/S. All of these valuations are basically all-time lows.</p><p><blockquote>要了解Shopee盈利后的终端估值，我们可以看看行业同行。亚马逊是一家盈利且增长较慢的同行，其市盈率为4倍。AWS推高了这一数字，但亚马逊对第一方销售的高敞口抵消了这一影响。其他电子商务市场同行的估值类似：阿里巴巴-SW的市盈率为3倍，MercadoLibre的市盈率为9倍。所有这些估值基本上都是历史低点。</blockquote></p><p>If Shopee keeps doubling revenue over the next couple of years (which it&#39;s easily done every year since 2016), becomes profitable (which scaling up tends to help with), and will have Amazon&#39;s P/S multiple in two years, then at 16 P/S today it would trade flat for two years. But if it keeps growing much faster than Amazon over a longer period like a decade, and/or if the overall industry multiples expand to more normal historical levels, then even at 16x P/S this segment has potential upside. On the other hand, if it stops growing or never becomes profitable then investors will be very disappointed at any P/S.</p><p><blockquote>如果Shopee在未来几年内收入持续翻倍（自2016年以来每年都很容易做到），实现盈利（扩大规模往往会有所帮助），并在两年内达到亚马逊的市盈率倍数，那么今天的市盈率为16倍，它将在两年内持平。但如果它在十年等较长时间内保持比亚马逊快得多的增长速度，和/或如果整个行业市盈率扩大到更正常的历史水平，那么即使市盈率为16倍，该细分市场也有潜在的上涨空间。另一方面，如果它停止增长或永远无法盈利，那么投资者将对任何市盈率感到非常失望。</blockquote></p><p>Given this wide range of outcomes, each person is going to have their own way of valuing this segment. For me, when I look at Shopee&#39;s mobile dominance, relatively small current size, the funding coming in from Garena, and the precedent set by Amazon, Alibaba, and MercadoLibre for the sustainable long-term success of this business model, I am optimistic about this segment&#39;s future. I recognize that it&#39;s currently an unprofitable and thus risky segment, but I also see the massive potential.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这种广泛的结果，每个人都会有自己的方式来评估这一部分。对我来说，当我看到Shopee的移动主导地位、目前相对较小的规模、来自Garena的资金以及Amazon、阿里巴巴-SW和MercadoLibre为这种商业模式的可持续长期成功树立的先例时，我对这个细分市场的未来持乐观态度。我认识到这是一个目前无利可图且存在风险的细分市场，但我也看到了巨大的潜力。</blockquote></p><p>So I am happy paying a 16x P/S multiple, which values the e-commerce segment at $83.2B. Some people will call that way too high, and those people will probably never get a chance to invest in this company, for better or for worse.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我很高兴支付16倍的市盈率，这使得电子商务部门的估值为$832亿。有些人的看涨期权太高，这些人可能永远没有机会投资这家公司，无论好坏。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, with just Garena and Shopee, I have Sea being worth $106.7B. Its current market cap is $123.1B. To account for the difference, let&#39;s look at the other parts of Sea.</p><p><blockquote>因此，仅算上Garena和Shopee，我认为Sea的价值为$1067亿。其目前的市值为$123.1 B。为了解释这种差异，让我们看看海洋的其他部分。</blockquote></p><p><b>FinTech &amp; Investments</b></p><p><blockquote><b>金融科技与投资</b></blockquote></p><p>The easiest addition to my computed valuation is Sea&#39;s $12B cash pile, partially offset by $4B in debt. This adds some nice optionality to the company and ensures that it won&#39;t be bankrupt any time soon despite losing money with Shopee. Adding in the $8B cash difference puts my computed valuation at $114.7B, just $8.4B short of the actual valuation.</p><p><blockquote>我计算的估值中最容易增加的是Sea的120B美元现金储备，部分被40亿美元的债务抵消。这为该公司增加了一些不错的选择，并确保尽管Shopee亏损，但它不会很快破产。加上$8B现金差额，我的计算估值为$114.7 B，仅比实际估值低$8.4 B。</blockquote></p><p>Then there is Sea&#39;s FinTech arm, SeaMoney. The main product here is a mobile wallet, which was responsible for $4.6B in payment volume in the last quarter (~$20B over a year). This segment accounted for $132 million in Q3 revenue, up a whopping 818% year over year. This implies a &#34;take rate&#34; of 2.9%, which is even better than established FinTech companies like Visa (V). Because of this high take rate, I&#39;m not worried about SeaMoney losing money while it scales.</p><p><blockquote>然后是Sea的金融科技部门SeaMoney。这里的主要产品是移动钱包，上个季度的支付量为46亿美元（一年约为200亿美元）。该部门第三季度收入为1.32亿美元，同比增长818%。这意味着2.9%的“采用率”，甚至比Visa(V)等老牌金融科技公司还要好。由于采用率很高，我并不担心SeaMoney在扩大规模时会亏损。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Despite SeaMoney being a small segment, it&#39;s now reaching a point where it can be factored into the valuation. Maybe it&#39;s only worth a couple of billion, but this is just the start. Five years ago, nobody would have expected that an e-commerce platform accounting for 5% of Sea&#39;s sales would today be worth more than the gaming segment. But Sea&#39;s management - combined with Garena&#39;s ability to fund new segments and drive their viral adoption - made it happen. It&#39;s certainly not guaranteed that Sea will have the same success with FinTech, but there is precedent for it.</p><p><blockquote>尽管SeaMoney只是一个很小的细分市场，但它现在已经达到了可以纳入估值的程度。也许它只值几十亿，但这只是一个开始。五年前，没有人会想到，一个占Sea销售额5%的电子商务平台今天的价值会超过游戏领域。但Sea的管理层——加上Garena为新细分市场提供资金并推动其病毒式采用的能力——实现了这一目标。当然，不能保证Sea在金融科技方面会取得同样的成功，但这是有先例的。</blockquote></p><p>If one day this segment is worth a third or more of Sea (in 2020, FinTech accounted for 36% of MercadoLibre&#39;s revenue) then getting it for just 7% of the business today will be well worth it, even if that implies a somewhat high 16x P/S multiple for the segment today. Actually, this multiple is already lower than Visa&#39;s, Mastercard&#39;s (NYSE:MA), and Affirm&#39;s (NASDAQ:AFRM). Realistically, a segment growing at 818% year over year should probably get a higher multiple than these slower-growing companies&#39;, but we don&#39;t even need to speculate about what a fair multiple is, since we can reach Sea&#39;s current valuation by using 16x P/S in my model valuation.</p><p><blockquote>如果有一天这个细分市场的价值达到Sea的三分之一或更多（2020年，金融科技占MercadoLibre收入的36%），那么今天仅以7%的业务获得它将是非常值得的，即使这意味着今天该细分市场的市盈率为16倍。事实上，这个倍数已经低于Visa、Mastercard（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MA）和Affirm（纳斯达克股票代码：AFRM）。实际上，同比增长818%的细分市场可能应该比这些增长较慢的公司获得更高的市盈率，但我们甚至不需要猜测什么是公平市盈率，因为我们可以通过在我的模型估值中使用16倍市盈率来达到Sea当前的估值。</blockquote></p><p>One way this segment could grow even more is through the introduction of more products besides the mobile wallet. Sea noted in their recent earnings that they have started &#34;early initiatives in other digital financial services such as buy now pay later, digital bank, and insurtech.&#34; These guys sure know how to hop on the latest high growth trend.</p><p><blockquote>这一细分市场进一步增长的一个方法是推出除移动钱包之外的更多产品。Sea在最近的财报中指出，他们已经开始“在其他数字金融服务方面采取早期举措，例如先买后付、数字银行和保险科技”。这些人肯定知道如何抓住最新的高增长趋势。</blockquote></p><p>Finally, there&#39;s the investments arm. Sea is investing in early-stage tech companies, especially in Southeast Asia. There&#39;s strong precedent for companies like Tencent (which is itself an investor in Sea) and Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) managing successful investment portfolios that ultimately factor meaningfully into their valuation. Right now Sea&#39;s investment arm is very early stage, so I don&#39;t include it in my valuation model. But it doesn&#39;t have to be factored in to justify the current share price. It&#39;s just one more area that might be worth a large part of Sea one day.</p><p><blockquote>最后是投资部门。Sea正在投资早期科技公司，尤其是在东南亚。腾讯控股（其本身就是Sea的投资者）和Shopify（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SHOP）等公司管理成功的投资组合，最终对其估值产生有意义的影响，这是有先例的。目前Sea的投资部门还处于早期阶段，因此我没有将其纳入我的估值模型中。但不一定要考虑到这一点来证明当前股价的合理性。这只是又一个有一天可能抵得上一大部分海洋的区域。</blockquote></p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p>Looking at each of Sea&#39;s segments, my valuation model indicates that Sea is fairly valued today. However, my model doesn&#39;t account for the significant optionality of the newer segments. Just like e-commerce did over the last five years, FinTech (and/or investments) could grow to become a very large part of Sea&#39;s business. With the FinTech segment currently growing at 818% year over year, it doesn&#39;t take much imagination to see how this happens. Just another year or two of growth at something close to that rate will make the FinTech arm impossible for investors to ignore.</p><p><blockquote>纵观Sea的每个细分市场，我的估值模型表明Sea目前的估值相当合理。然而，我的模型没有考虑到新细分市场的重要可选性。就像电子商务在过去五年中所做的那样，金融科技（和/或投资）可能会发展成为Sea业务的一个非常重要的部分。金融科技领域目前同比增长818%，不需要太多想象力就能看出这是如何发生的。只要再以接近这一速度增长一两年，投资者就无法忽视金融科技部门。</blockquote></p><p>This optionality combined general strength in each business has allowed Sea to post an average revenue beat of 7% over the past year. Earnings haven&#39;t been as strong, and I expect that to be the main point of contention with my valuation model, as is the case for most unprofitable companies. In particular, I expect some readers will disagree with my valuation of the e-commerce segment. But even if you drop e-commerce all the way down to 5x P/S (a multiple seen today by much slower growing e-commerce companies) that implies 54% downside from today&#39;s prices. It&#39;s a steep drop for sure, but most companies in today&#39;s market would be looking at such a decline if one were to use the most conservative valuation standards possible.</p><p><blockquote>这种选择性结合了每项业务的总体实力，使Sea在过去一年的平均收入增长了7%。盈利并没有那么强劲，我预计这将成为我的估值模型的主要争论点，就像大多数未盈利公司的情况一样。特别是，我预计一些读者会不同意我对电子商务领域的估值。但即使你将电子商务的市盈率一路降至5倍（这是当今增长缓慢得多的电子商务公司的市盈率），这也意味着比今天的价格下跌54%。这肯定是一个急剧的下跌，但如果使用最保守的估值标准，当今市场上的大多数公司都会看到这样的下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Only fast-growing companies like Sea can quickly offset such a decline with revenue growth. As a result, the businesses with the most long-term potential will hardly ever trade at the most conservative valuation possible. And Sea certainly has long-term potential. It&#39;s one of the few high-growth companies I own that I could see reaching a trillion-dollar market cap this decade.</p><p><blockquote>只有像Sea这样快速增长的公司才能用收入增长迅速抵消这种下降。因此，最具长期潜力的企业很难以最保守的估值进行交易。Sea当然具有长期潜力。这是我拥有的少数几家高增长公司之一，我认为这些公司在这十年内市值将达到万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Shares Jumped More Than 4% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨逾4%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Shares Jumped More Than 4% in Morning Trading<blockquote>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨逾4%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 23:04</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>Sea Limited股价早盘上涨超过4%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/448dcc7d589843674730e046aa6ef96a\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>Also Read:</b><b>Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Understand The Recent Selloff</b></p><p><blockquote><b>另请阅读：</b><b>Sea Limited：深入了解最近的抛售</b></blockquote></p><p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Sea Limited is a highly diversified business firing on all cylinders in some of the fastest-growing economies in the world.</li><li>I dive into each of its segments to understand the recent selloff and justify the current valuation.</li><li>I consider Sea one of my ten highest conviction investments.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa5cbe0a30acc723a2c6f62300024002\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Sea Limited是一家高度多元化的企业，在世界上一些增长最快的经济体中全力以赴。</li><li>我深入研究了它的每个细分市场，以了解最近的抛售并证明当前估值的合理性。</li><li>我认为Sea是我最有信心的十项投资之一。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>kokkai/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>论文</b></blockquote></p><p>A by-parts analysis of Sea Limited&#39;s (NYSE:SE) segments shows that its current valuation is roughly fair, but there are many long-term growth drivers that could surprise to the upside and drive very strong returns for years to come.</p><p><blockquote>对Sea Limited（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SE）部门的细分分析表明，其目前的估值大致公平，但有许多长期增长动力可能会出人意料地上涨，并在未来几年推动非常强劲的回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Introduction</b></p><p><blockquote><b>介绍</b></blockquote></p><p>I recently wrote an article highlighting my top 10 stock picks for 2022. I&#39;d already done an in-depth analysis of my other nine picks in other Seeking Alpha articles, so I thought it would be good to close out the year with an article about Sea.</p><p><blockquote>我最近写了一篇文章，重点介绍了我选择的2022年十大股票。我已经在其他Seeking Alpha文章中对我的其他九个选择进行了深入分析，所以我认为最好以一篇关于Sea的文章来结束这一年。</blockquote></p><p>Furthermore, with shares down significantly over the past couple of months (but still slightly up for the year), I believe this article may prove timely. I don&#39;t speculate on short-term market movements, but I personally added to my Sea shares recently. It&#39;s one of my only losing positions that I didn&#39;t sell out of temporarily for tax-loss harvesting, and in this article, I will explain why Sea is such a high conviction holding for me.</p><p><blockquote>此外，由于过去几个月股价大幅下跌（但今年仍略有上涨），我相信这篇文章可能是及时的。我不推测短期市场走势，但我个人最近增持了Sea股票。这是我唯一没有为了收获税收损失而暂时卖出的亏损头寸之一，在本文中，我将解释为什么Sea对我来说是如此坚定的持有。</blockquote></p><p>It&#39;s also worth noting that many professional investors seem to share this opinion. Sea is the 121st largest company in the world, but it&#39;s the16thmost popular holding among hedge funds. This implies that big money is overweight Sea, with 71% of shares held by institutions.</p><p><blockquote>还值得注意的是，许多专业投资者似乎也认同这一观点。Sea是全球第121大公司，但在对冲基金中排名第16位。这暗示大资金是跑赢大盘海，71%的股份被机构持有。</blockquote></p><p>Because Sea operates in many different areas, I will do a separate analysis of each of its operating segments to justify its current valuation and explain how that valuation could drive unexpectedly strong returns for years.</p><p><blockquote>由于Sea在许多不同的领域开展业务，我将对其每个运营部门进行单独分析，以证明其当前估值的合理性，并解释该估值如何在多年来推动意想不到的强劲回报。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gaming</b></p><p><blockquote><b>游戏</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea Limited&#39;s gaming segment Garena is best known for Free Fire, a mobile battle royale game that was developed in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Sea Limited的游戏部门Garena因其内部开发的移动大逃杀游戏《Free Fire》而闻名。</blockquote></p><p>The game was released in 2017 and has been very popular ever since. It currently has the second most monthly active users among all Android games globally. The game is available worldwide, but it&#39;s particularly popular in emerging markets like SEA, LATAM, and India, where it&#39;s been the highest-grossing mobile game for over two years.</p><p><blockquote>该游戏于2017年发布，此后一直非常受欢迎。它目前在全球所有安卓游戏中拥有第二大月活跃用户。这款游戏在全球范围内都有售，但在东南亚、拉美和印度等新兴市场尤其受欢迎，两年多来，它一直是这些市场票房最高的手机游戏。</blockquote></p><p>With the game having been popular for a long time already, there&#39;s some concern that gamers will move on to the next big thing. Although there are some mobile games that are older than Free Fire and still very popular - like Roblox, Clash of Clans, and Pokemon Go - there are many more that have been forgotten. Until Garena releases more games and proves that it can be successful with them too, there will always be questions about whether its studio is a one-hit wonder.</p><p><blockquote>随着这款游戏已经流行了很长时间，有人担心游戏玩家会转向下一件大事。虽然有一些手机游戏比Free Fire更古老，但仍然非常受欢迎——如Roblox、Clash of Clans和Pokemon Go——但还有更多已经被遗忘。在Garena发布更多游戏并证明它也可以在这些游戏上取得成功之前，总会有人质疑它的工作室是否是一个昙花一现的奇迹。</blockquote></p><p>Regardless, Garena is a critical part of Sea because it&#39;s the only profitable segment and it doubles a social platform that provides free advertising for Sea&#39;s non-gaming products. Cross-promotion is a huge competitive advantage for Sea.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，Garena是Sea的重要组成部分，因为它是唯一盈利的细分市场，并且它是为Sea非游戏产品提供免费广告的社交平台的两倍。交叉推广是Sea的巨大竞争优势。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, one reason for Sea&#39;s recent selloff could be the Q4 guidance implied for Garena.</p><p><blockquote>因此，Sea最近抛售的原因之一可能是Garena暗示的第四季度指引。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e299727cc28a887a36d88831aec8f53\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"334\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Earnings Call Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：看涨期权收益演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>In Q2 this year, Garena raised its guidance to $4.5B-$4.7B for 2021 bookings (up from $4.3B-$4.5B). With the first three quarters already totaling $3.5B, this implies that Q4 bookings will come in at $1.0B-$1.2B, up between 0% and 20% year over year, and likely down sequentially. This is compared to 29% growth in the most recent quarter and 44% projected growth for the full year.</p><p><blockquote>今年第二季度，Garena将2021年预订量的指导上调至45亿美元至47亿美元（高于43亿美元至45亿美元）。由于前三个季度的总预订量已经达到$3.5 B，这意味着第四季度的预订量将达到$1.0 B-$1.2 B，同比增长0%至20%，并且可能会环比下降。相比之下，最近一个季度的增长率为29%，全年预计增长率为44%。</blockquote></p><p>While 20% isn&#39;t a terrible deceleration, 0% certainly is. Even 20% growth isn&#39;t spectacular compared to the historic levels. At the 10% midpoint, Garena&#39;s growth looks more similar to that of a mature company like Activision (NASDAQ:ATVI) or Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) than a fast-growing company like Roblox (NYSE:RBLX).</p><p><blockquote>虽然20%并不是一个可怕的减速，但0%肯定是。与历史水平相比，即使是20%的增长也并不引人注目。在10%的中点，Garena的增长看起来更类似于动视暴雪（纳斯达克股票代码：ATVI）或Zynga（纳斯达克股票代码：ZNGA）等成熟公司，而不是Roblox（纽约证券交易所股票代码：RBLX）等快速增长的公司。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Garena&#39;s implied valuation should - and did - suffer as a result. While a fast-growing company like Roblox can command a high double-digit P/S multiple, Activision and Zynga trade at an average P/S multiple of just 4. Garena is slightly more profitable than them and probably has more risk to the upside, so I&#39;ll use a P/S multiple of 5 for my implied valuation. This implies a P/E of about 10 for a business growing at around 10%, which is very reasonable in today&#39;s market.</p><p><blockquote>Garena的隐含估值应该——也确实——因此受到影响。虽然像Roblox这样快速增长的公司可以获得两位数的高市盈率，但动视暴雪和Zynga的平均市盈率仅为4倍。Garena的利润比他们略高，而且可能有更大的上行风险，因此我将使用市盈率倍数5作为我的隐含估值。这意味着一家增长率在10%左右的企业的市盈率约为10，这在当今市场上是非常合理的。</blockquote></p><p>This means Garena is worth $23.5B based on the high end of management&#39;s guidance.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着根据管理层指导的高端，Garena的价值为235亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>I believe this valuation is actually conservative for a few reasons:</p><p><blockquote>我相信这个估值实际上是保守的，原因有几个：</blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Next year has tough comps and growth could re-accelerate in the following years or even next year, especially if Garena releases a new hit game. The growth rate past next quarter is not based on explicit guidance from the company, only industry forecasts.</li><li>The peer valuations I used are from companies also trading at the lower end of their valuation range for the past year.</li><li>Garena has a good track record and is continuing to invest in Free Fire. One example of this is the recently released Free Fire MAX, which improves the experience for users with higher-end phones and even adds a metaverse-like customizable map called Craftland. To me, this implies that Garena believes Free Fire is still in the earlier part of its lifecycle.</li><li>Although I&#39;d obviously prefer that Garena develops more games in house, in the meantime it&#39;s still not a one-trick pony. In addition to Free Fire, Garena distributes games from third-party developers like Tencent (OTCMKTS:OTCPK:TCEHY). These are popular titles like League of Legends and Call of Duty, which meaningfully diversify Garena&#39;s revenue.</li></ul><b>E-Commerce</b></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>明年的竞争很艰难，增长可能会在接下来的几年甚至明年重新加速，特别是如果Garena发布一款新的热门游戏。下个季度的增长率不是基于公司的明确指导，而是基于行业预测。</li><li>我使用的同行估值来自去年交易价格也处于估值范围下限的公司。</li><li>Garena拥有良好的业绩记录，并将继续投资Free Fire。这方面的一个例子是最近发布的Free Fire MAX，它改善了高端手机用户的体验，甚至添加了一个类似元宇宙的可定制地图，称为Craftland。对我来说，这意味着Garena认为Free Fire仍处于其生命周期的早期阶段。</li><li>虽然我显然更希望Garena在内部开发更多的游戏，但与此同时，它仍然不是一匹只会一招的小马。除了Free Fire之外，Garena还发行腾讯控股(OTCMKTS：OTCPK：TCEHY)等第三方开发商的游戏。这些都是像《英雄联盟》和《使命看涨期权》这样受欢迎的游戏，它们有意义地使Garena的收入多样化。</li></ul><b>电子商务</b></blockquote></p><p>Sea&#39;s e-commerce platform Shopee is currently its big growth driver. This platform is often considered the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) of Southeast Asia, and it recently expanded into more markets including Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>Sea的电子商务平台Shopee目前是其最大的增长动力。该平台通常被认为是东南亚的亚马逊（纳斯达克：AMZN），最近它扩展到包括巴西在内的更多市场。</blockquote></p><p>There&#39;s always some debate about who is really the Amazon of a region. Shopee certainly has competition, including from Alibaba&#39;s (NYSE:BABA) Lazada, Tokopedia in Indonesia, MercadoLibre (MELI) in Brazil, and even Amazon itself. With most of the competition being private or tucked away into a larger company, many of the competitors don&#39;t publish exact revenue numbers, which makes it difficult to measure the competition. Even Sea hasn&#39;t published explicit revenue numbers for some countries like Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>关于谁是一个地区真正的亚马逊，总是有一些争论。Shopee当然面临竞争，包括来自阿里巴巴-SW(NYSE：BABA)的Lazada、印尼的Tokopedia、巴西的MercadoLibre(MELI)，甚至Amazon本身。由于大多数竞争都是私人的或隐藏在更大的公司中，许多竞争对手不会公布确切的收入数字，这使得衡量竞争变得困难。就连Sea也没有公布巴西等一些国家的明确收入数据。</blockquote></p><p>One neutral source that can be assessed is the Alexa site rank, which as its name suggests ranks sites by their popularity. Keep in mind that these are ranks, so a lower score is better.</p><p><blockquote>一个可以评估的中立来源是Alexa网站排名，顾名思义，它根据网站的受欢迎程度对网站进行排名。请记住，这些都是排名，所以分数越低越好。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/180367a2b64bccebf243c5b6d8fb776a\" tg-width=\"455\" tg-height=\"353\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from Alexa</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自Alexa</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shopee is very mobile-focused, but the above table only considers the website. To check App Store app ranks for the shopping category, we can use App Annie.</p><p><blockquote>Shopee非常专注于移动，但上表只考虑了网站。要查看购物类别的App Store应用排名，我们可以使用App Annie。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6544f014a5d70d13ee14dab0ac8b6782\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"403\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: The Author, compiled from AppAnnie</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源：作者，编译自AppAnnie</span></p></blockquote></p><p>On the mobile side, there&#39;s no need to look at the competition because Shopee is consistently the number one shopping app in every country listed. In a mobile-first world, this bodes very well. Even on the web side, Shopee wins out except in a few specific regions like LATAM and (barely) Indonesia, which have more local competitors.</p><p><blockquote>在移动端，没有必要关注竞争，因为Shopee一直是每个国家排名第一的购物应用。在移动优先的世界里，这是个好兆头。即使在网络方面，Shopee也胜出，除了拉丁美洲和（勉强）印度尼西亚等少数特定地区，这些地区有更多的本地竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p>Of course, traffic doesn&#39;t always translate to GMV. But for a shopping app where most people will use the app to buy something, it&#39;s a decent proxy. A third party estimates that Shopee accounts for57%of all e-commerce in Southeast Asia. It&#39;s Shopee&#39;s dominance in the mobile app ranks and market share that make me consider it the Amazon of Southeast Asia.</p><p><blockquote>当然，流量并不总是转化为GMV。但对于一个大多数人都会使用该应用程序购买东西的购物应用程序来说，这是一个不错的代理。第三方估计Shopee占东南亚所有电子商务的57%。正是Shopee在移动应用排名和市场份额方面的主导地位让我认为它是东南亚的亚马逊。</blockquote></p><p>So why would a company with so much potential sell off?</p><p><blockquote>那么，为什么一家潜力如此之大的公司会抛售呢？</blockquote></p><p>After the recent earnings report, some analysts expressed concern that Shopee is branching out into other countries like Poland and Mexico before validating its business model in the current markets. In these countries, Shopee has less of a presence; it&#39;s bounced between the 3-5 spots on the Mexico App Store for shopping apps, and between spots 1 and 3 in Poland. Although analysts hate uncertainty - and the CEO&#39;s comments that they don&#39;t have a concrete measure of success in these earlier stage countries won&#39;t help with that - Shopee has a history of entering new countries successfully and I am willing to give management some time to try expanding more. After all, if they&#39;re successful, then it could drive even more unexpected growth in the future.</p><p><blockquote>在最近的财报发布后，一些分析师对Shopee在当前市场验证其商业模式之前将业务扩展到波兰和墨西哥等其他国家表示担忧。在这些国家，Shopee的影响力较小；它在墨西哥应用商店购物应用的3-5位之间波动，在波兰的1-3位之间波动。尽管分析师讨厌不确定性——而且首席执行官关于他们在这些早期国家没有具体的成功衡量标准的评论对此没有帮助——但Shopee有着成功进入新国家的历史，我愿意给管理层一些时间尝试进一步扩张。毕竟，如果他们成功了，那么它可能会在未来推动更多意想不到的增长。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Another complaint from analysts was that the basket size (average purchase size) is trending down. While that could also have contributed to the recent selloff, it&#39;s hard to complain when the overall sales increased a lot despite a decrease in basket size.</p><p><blockquote>分析师的另一个抱怨是篮子规模（平均购买规模）呈下降趋势。虽然这也可能导致了最近的抛售，但尽管篮子规模有所下降，但当整体销售额大幅增长时，很难抱怨。</blockquote></p><p>The company raised its guidance for e-commerce again in Q3, now guiding for $5.0B-$5.2B in 2021 e-commerce revenue. That&#39;s 75%-100% growth in Q4 and about 135% growth for the year. These are much more exciting numbers than the gaming side, although the guidance still implies a slight deceleration in Q4. But compared to Amazon&#39;s $340B in 2020 e-commerce sales, Shopee looks like it&#39;s just scratched the surface. E-commerce is at only11%penetration in Southeast Asia compared to18.7%in the USA, and Southeast Asia economies are generally growing faster than the USA&#39;s.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在第三季度再次上调了电子商务指引，目前预计2021年电子商务收入为$5.0 B-$5.2 B。第四季度增长75%-100%，全年增长约135%。这些数字比游戏方面更令人兴奋，尽管指导仍然意味着第四季度略有减速。但与亚马逊2020年3400亿美元的电子商务销售额相比，Shopee看起来只是触及了表面。电子商务在东南亚的渗透率仅为11%，而美国为18.7%，东南亚经济体的增长速度普遍高于美国。</blockquote></p><p>Despite being in a blue skies industry, it&#39;s more difficult to value the e-commerce segment because it operates at a loss (whereas the gaming segment is highly profitable). Shopee&#39;s success is not guaranteed because it&#39;s not clear at this point whether the platform can become profitable while retaining its market share. Stocks like this tend to experience more volatility, which could partially explain the recent selloff.</p><p><blockquote>尽管处于蓝天行业，但对电子商务部门进行估值更加困难，因为它处于亏损状态（而游戏部门利润丰厚）。Shopee的成功并不能保证，因为目前尚不清楚该平台能否在保持市场份额的同时实现盈利。像这样的股票往往会经历更大的波动，这可以部分解释最近的抛售。</blockquote></p><p>For unprofitable software companies, I like to use the Rule of 40 to assess the business. But it&#39;s difficult to apply this rule to a more cyclical e-commerce company with naturally lower margins. Even so, it&#39;s worth noting that despite being unprofitable, Sea&#39;s Rule of 40 score of 104 is better than most SaaS companies&#39;, and also better than e-commerce peers Amazon (21), MercadoLibre (73), and Alibaba (43).</p><p><blockquote>对于不盈利的软件公司，我喜欢用40法则来评估业务。但很难将这一规则应用于利润率自然较低、周期性较强的电子商务公司。即便如此，值得注意的是，尽管没有盈利，Sea的40分（104分）优于大多数SaaS公司，也优于电子商务同行Amazon（21分）、MercadoLibre（73分）和阿里巴巴-SW（43分）。</blockquote></p><p>To understand Shopee&#39;s terminal valuation once it becomes profitable, we can look at industry peers. Amazon is one profitable and slower-growing peer, and it trades at 4x P/S. AWS pushes this number up, but Amazon&#39;s high exposure to first-party sales offsets that. Other e-commerce marketplace peers trade at similar valuations: Alibaba at 3x P/S, MercadoLibre at 9x P/S. All of these valuations are basically all-time lows.</p><p><blockquote>要了解Shopee盈利后的终端估值，我们可以看看行业同行。亚马逊是一家盈利且增长较慢的同行，其市盈率为4倍。AWS推高了这一数字，但亚马逊对第一方销售的高敞口抵消了这一影响。其他电子商务市场同行的估值类似：阿里巴巴-SW的市盈率为3倍，MercadoLibre的市盈率为9倍。所有这些估值基本上都是历史低点。</blockquote></p><p>If Shopee keeps doubling revenue over the next couple of years (which it&#39;s easily done every year since 2016), becomes profitable (which scaling up tends to help with), and will have Amazon&#39;s P/S multiple in two years, then at 16 P/S today it would trade flat for two years. But if it keeps growing much faster than Amazon over a longer period like a decade, and/or if the overall industry multiples expand to more normal historical levels, then even at 16x P/S this segment has potential upside. On the other hand, if it stops growing or never becomes profitable then investors will be very disappointed at any P/S.</p><p><blockquote>如果Shopee在未来几年内收入持续翻倍（自2016年以来每年都很容易做到），实现盈利（扩大规模往往会有所帮助），并在两年内达到亚马逊的市盈率倍数，那么今天的市盈率为16倍，它将在两年内持平。但如果它在十年等较长时间内保持比亚马逊快得多的增长速度，和/或如果整个行业市盈率扩大到更正常的历史水平，那么即使市盈率为16倍，该细分市场也有潜在的上涨空间。另一方面，如果它停止增长或永远无法盈利，那么投资者将对任何市盈率感到非常失望。</blockquote></p><p>Given this wide range of outcomes, each person is going to have their own way of valuing this segment. For me, when I look at Shopee&#39;s mobile dominance, relatively small current size, the funding coming in from Garena, and the precedent set by Amazon, Alibaba, and MercadoLibre for the sustainable long-term success of this business model, I am optimistic about this segment&#39;s future. I recognize that it&#39;s currently an unprofitable and thus risky segment, but I also see the massive potential.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这种广泛的结果，每个人都会有自己的方式来评估这一部分。对我来说，当我看到Shopee的移动主导地位、目前相对较小的规模、来自Garena的资金以及Amazon、阿里巴巴-SW和MercadoLibre为这种商业模式的可持续长期成功树立的先例时，我对这个细分市场的未来持乐观态度。我认识到这是一个目前无利可图且存在风险的细分市场，但我也看到了巨大的潜力。</blockquote></p><p>So I am happy paying a 16x P/S multiple, which values the e-commerce segment at $83.2B. Some people will call that way too high, and those people will probably never get a chance to invest in this company, for better or for worse.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我很高兴支付16倍的市盈率，这使得电子商务部门的估值为$832亿。有些人的看涨期权太高，这些人可能永远没有机会投资这家公司，无论好坏。</blockquote></p><p>Thus, with just Garena and Shopee, I have Sea being worth $106.7B. Its current market cap is $123.1B. To account for the difference, let&#39;s look at the other parts of Sea.</p><p><blockquote>因此，仅算上Garena和Shopee，我认为Sea的价值为$1067亿。其目前的市值为$123.1 B。为了解释这种差异，让我们看看海洋的其他部分。</blockquote></p><p><b>FinTech &amp; Investments</b></p><p><blockquote><b>金融科技与投资</b></blockquote></p><p>The easiest addition to my computed valuation is Sea&#39;s $12B cash pile, partially offset by $4B in debt. This adds some nice optionality to the company and ensures that it won&#39;t be bankrupt any time soon despite losing money with Shopee. Adding in the $8B cash difference puts my computed valuation at $114.7B, just $8.4B short of the actual valuation.</p><p><blockquote>我计算的估值中最容易增加的是Sea的120B美元现金储备，部分被40亿美元的债务抵消。这为该公司增加了一些不错的选择，并确保尽管Shopee亏损，但它不会很快破产。加上$8B现金差额，我的计算估值为$114.7 B，仅比实际估值低$8.4 B。</blockquote></p><p>Then there is Sea&#39;s FinTech arm, SeaMoney. The main product here is a mobile wallet, which was responsible for $4.6B in payment volume in the last quarter (~$20B over a year). This segment accounted for $132 million in Q3 revenue, up a whopping 818% year over year. This implies a &#34;take rate&#34; of 2.9%, which is even better than established FinTech companies like Visa (V). Because of this high take rate, I&#39;m not worried about SeaMoney losing money while it scales.</p><p><blockquote>然后是Sea的金融科技部门SeaMoney。这里的主要产品是移动钱包，上个季度的支付量为46亿美元（一年约为200亿美元）。该部门第三季度收入为1.32亿美元，同比增长818%。这意味着2.9%的“采用率”，甚至比Visa(V)等老牌金融科技公司还要好。由于采用率很高，我并不担心SeaMoney在扩大规模时会亏损。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Despite SeaMoney being a small segment, it&#39;s now reaching a point where it can be factored into the valuation. Maybe it&#39;s only worth a couple of billion, but this is just the start. Five years ago, nobody would have expected that an e-commerce platform accounting for 5% of Sea&#39;s sales would today be worth more than the gaming segment. But Sea&#39;s management - combined with Garena&#39;s ability to fund new segments and drive their viral adoption - made it happen. It&#39;s certainly not guaranteed that Sea will have the same success with FinTech, but there is precedent for it.</p><p><blockquote>尽管SeaMoney只是一个很小的细分市场，但它现在已经达到了可以纳入估值的程度。也许它只值几十亿，但这只是一个开始。五年前，没有人会想到，一个占Sea销售额5%的电子商务平台今天的价值会超过游戏领域。但Sea的管理层——加上Garena为新细分市场提供资金并推动其病毒式采用的能力——实现了这一目标。当然，不能保证Sea在金融科技方面会取得同样的成功，但这是有先例的。</blockquote></p><p>If one day this segment is worth a third or more of Sea (in 2020, FinTech accounted for 36% of MercadoLibre&#39;s revenue) then getting it for just 7% of the business today will be well worth it, even if that implies a somewhat high 16x P/S multiple for the segment today. Actually, this multiple is already lower than Visa&#39;s, Mastercard&#39;s (NYSE:MA), and Affirm&#39;s (NASDAQ:AFRM). Realistically, a segment growing at 818% year over year should probably get a higher multiple than these slower-growing companies&#39;, but we don&#39;t even need to speculate about what a fair multiple is, since we can reach Sea&#39;s current valuation by using 16x P/S in my model valuation.</p><p><blockquote>如果有一天这个细分市场的价值达到Sea的三分之一或更多（2020年，金融科技占MercadoLibre收入的36%），那么今天仅以7%的业务获得它将是非常值得的，即使这意味着今天该细分市场的市盈率为16倍。事实上，这个倍数已经低于Visa、Mastercard（纽约证券交易所股票代码：MA）和Affirm（纳斯达克股票代码：AFRM）。实际上，同比增长818%的细分市场可能应该比这些增长较慢的公司获得更高的市盈率，但我们甚至不需要猜测什么是公平市盈率，因为我们可以通过在我的模型估值中使用16倍市盈率来达到Sea当前的估值。</blockquote></p><p>One way this segment could grow even more is through the introduction of more products besides the mobile wallet. Sea noted in their recent earnings that they have started &#34;early initiatives in other digital financial services such as buy now pay later, digital bank, and insurtech.&#34; These guys sure know how to hop on the latest high growth trend.</p><p><blockquote>这一细分市场进一步增长的一个方法是推出除移动钱包之外的更多产品。Sea在最近的财报中指出，他们已经开始“在其他数字金融服务方面采取早期举措，例如先买后付、数字银行和保险科技”。这些人肯定知道如何抓住最新的高增长趋势。</blockquote></p><p>Finally, there&#39;s the investments arm. Sea is investing in early-stage tech companies, especially in Southeast Asia. There&#39;s strong precedent for companies like Tencent (which is itself an investor in Sea) and Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) managing successful investment portfolios that ultimately factor meaningfully into their valuation. Right now Sea&#39;s investment arm is very early stage, so I don&#39;t include it in my valuation model. But it doesn&#39;t have to be factored in to justify the current share price. It&#39;s just one more area that might be worth a large part of Sea one day.</p><p><blockquote>最后是投资部门。Sea正在投资早期科技公司，尤其是在东南亚。腾讯控股（其本身就是Sea的投资者）和Shopify（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SHOP）等公司管理成功的投资组合，最终对其估值产生有意义的影响，这是有先例的。目前Sea的投资部门还处于早期阶段，因此我没有将其纳入我的估值模型中。但不一定要考虑到这一点来证明当前股价的合理性。这只是又一个有一天可能抵得上一大部分海洋的区域。</blockquote></p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p>Looking at each of Sea&#39;s segments, my valuation model indicates that Sea is fairly valued today. However, my model doesn&#39;t account for the significant optionality of the newer segments. Just like e-commerce did over the last five years, FinTech (and/or investments) could grow to become a very large part of Sea&#39;s business. With the FinTech segment currently growing at 818% year over year, it doesn&#39;t take much imagination to see how this happens. Just another year or two of growth at something close to that rate will make the FinTech arm impossible for investors to ignore.</p><p><blockquote>纵观Sea的每个细分市场，我的估值模型表明Sea目前的估值相当合理。然而，我的模型没有考虑到新细分市场的重要可选性。就像电子商务在过去五年中所做的那样，金融科技（和/或投资）可能会发展成为Sea业务的一个非常重要的部分。金融科技领域目前同比增长818%，不需要太多想象力就能看出这是如何发生的。只要再以接近这一速度增长一两年，投资者就无法忽视金融科技部门。</blockquote></p><p>This optionality combined general strength in each business has allowed Sea to post an average revenue beat of 7% over the past year. Earnings haven&#39;t been as strong, and I expect that to be the main point of contention with my valuation model, as is the case for most unprofitable companies. In particular, I expect some readers will disagree with my valuation of the e-commerce segment. But even if you drop e-commerce all the way down to 5x P/S (a multiple seen today by much slower growing e-commerce companies) that implies 54% downside from today&#39;s prices. It&#39;s a steep drop for sure, but most companies in today&#39;s market would be looking at such a decline if one were to use the most conservative valuation standards possible.</p><p><blockquote>这种选择性结合了每项业务的总体实力，使Sea在过去一年的平均收入增长了7%。盈利并没有那么强劲，我预计这将成为我的估值模型的主要争论点，就像大多数未盈利公司的情况一样。特别是，我预计一些读者会不同意我对电子商务领域的估值。但即使你将电子商务的市盈率一路降至5倍（这是当今增长缓慢得多的电子商务公司的市盈率），这也意味着比今天的价格下跌54%。这肯定是一个急剧的下跌，但如果使用最保守的估值标准，当今市场上的大多数公司都会看到这样的下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Only fast-growing companies like Sea can quickly offset such a decline with revenue growth. As a result, the businesses with the most long-term potential will hardly ever trade at the most conservative valuation possible. And Sea certainly has long-term potential. It&#39;s one of the few high-growth companies I own that I could see reaching a trillion-dollar market cap this decade.</p><p><blockquote>只有像Sea这样快速增长的公司才能用收入增长迅速抵消这种下降。因此，最具长期潜力的企业很难以最保守的估值进行交易。Sea当然具有长期潜力。这是我拥有的少数几家高增长公司之一，我认为这些公司在这十年内市值将达到万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106092668","content_text":"Sea Limited shares jumped more than 4% in morning trading.Also Read:Sea Limited: A Deep Dive To Understand The Recent SelloffSummarySea Limited is a highly diversified business firing on all cylinders in some of the fastest-growing economies in the world.I dive into each of its segments to understand the recent selloff and justify the current valuation.I consider Sea one of my ten highest conviction investments.kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty ImagesThesisA by-parts analysis of Sea Limited's (NYSE:SE) segments shows that its current valuation is roughly fair, but there are many long-term growth drivers that could surprise to the upside and drive very strong returns for years to come.IntroductionI recently wrote an article highlighting my top 10 stock picks for 2022. I'd already done an in-depth analysis of my other nine picks in other Seeking Alpha articles, so I thought it would be good to close out the year with an article about Sea.Furthermore, with shares down significantly over the past couple of months (but still slightly up for the year), I believe this article may prove timely. I don't speculate on short-term market movements, but I personally added to my Sea shares recently. It's one of my only losing positions that I didn't sell out of temporarily for tax-loss harvesting, and in this article, I will explain why Sea is such a high conviction holding for me.It's also worth noting that many professional investors seem to share this opinion. Sea is the 121st largest company in the world, but it's the16thmost popular holding among hedge funds. This implies that big money is overweight Sea, with 71% of shares held by institutions.Because Sea operates in many different areas, I will do a separate analysis of each of its operating segments to justify its current valuation and explain how that valuation could drive unexpectedly strong returns for years.GamingSea Limited's gaming segment Garena is best known for Free Fire, a mobile battle royale game that was developed in-house.The game was released in 2017 and has been very popular ever since. It currently has the second most monthly active users among all Android games globally. The game is available worldwide, but it's particularly popular in emerging markets like SEA, LATAM, and India, where it's been the highest-grossing mobile game for over two years.With the game having been popular for a long time already, there's some concern that gamers will move on to the next big thing. Although there are some mobile games that are older than Free Fire and still very popular - like Roblox, Clash of Clans, and Pokemon Go - there are many more that have been forgotten. Until Garena releases more games and proves that it can be successful with them too, there will always be questions about whether its studio is a one-hit wonder.Regardless, Garena is a critical part of Sea because it's the only profitable segment and it doubles a social platform that provides free advertising for Sea's non-gaming products. Cross-promotion is a huge competitive advantage for Sea.Thus, one reason for Sea's recent selloff could be the Q4 guidance implied for Garena.Source: Earnings Call PresentationIn Q2 this year, Garena raised its guidance to $4.5B-$4.7B for 2021 bookings (up from $4.3B-$4.5B). With the first three quarters already totaling $3.5B, this implies that Q4 bookings will come in at $1.0B-$1.2B, up between 0% and 20% year over year, and likely down sequentially. This is compared to 29% growth in the most recent quarter and 44% projected growth for the full year.While 20% isn't a terrible deceleration, 0% certainly is. Even 20% growth isn't spectacular compared to the historic levels. At the 10% midpoint, Garena's growth looks more similar to that of a mature company like Activision (NASDAQ:ATVI) or Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) than a fast-growing company like Roblox (NYSE:RBLX).Garena's implied valuation should - and did - suffer as a result. While a fast-growing company like Roblox can command a high double-digit P/S multiple, Activision and Zynga trade at an average P/S multiple of just 4. Garena is slightly more profitable than them and probably has more risk to the upside, so I'll use a P/S multiple of 5 for my implied valuation. This implies a P/E of about 10 for a business growing at around 10%, which is very reasonable in today's market.This means Garena is worth $23.5B based on the high end of management's guidance.I believe this valuation is actually conservative for a few reasons:Next year has tough comps and growth could re-accelerate in the following years or even next year, especially if Garena releases a new hit game. The growth rate past next quarter is not based on explicit guidance from the company, only industry forecasts.The peer valuations I used are from companies also trading at the lower end of their valuation range for the past year.Garena has a good track record and is continuing to invest in Free Fire. One example of this is the recently released Free Fire MAX, which improves the experience for users with higher-end phones and even adds a metaverse-like customizable map called Craftland. To me, this implies that Garena believes Free Fire is still in the earlier part of its lifecycle.Although I'd obviously prefer that Garena develops more games in house, in the meantime it's still not a one-trick pony. In addition to Free Fire, Garena distributes games from third-party developers like Tencent (OTCMKTS:OTCPK:TCEHY). These are popular titles like League of Legends and Call of Duty, which meaningfully diversify Garena's revenue.E-CommerceSea's e-commerce platform Shopee is currently its big growth driver. This platform is often considered the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) of Southeast Asia, and it recently expanded into more markets including Brazil.There's always some debate about who is really the Amazon of a region. Shopee certainly has competition, including from Alibaba's (NYSE:BABA) Lazada, Tokopedia in Indonesia, MercadoLibre (MELI) in Brazil, and even Amazon itself. With most of the competition being private or tucked away into a larger company, many of the competitors don't publish exact revenue numbers, which makes it difficult to measure the competition. Even Sea hasn't published explicit revenue numbers for some countries like Brazil.One neutral source that can be assessed is the Alexa site rank, which as its name suggests ranks sites by their popularity. Keep in mind that these are ranks, so a lower score is better.Source: The Author, compiled from AlexaShopee is very mobile-focused, but the above table only considers the website. To check App Store app ranks for the shopping category, we can use App Annie.Source: The Author, compiled from AppAnnieOn the mobile side, there's no need to look at the competition because Shopee is consistently the number one shopping app in every country listed. In a mobile-first world, this bodes very well. Even on the web side, Shopee wins out except in a few specific regions like LATAM and (barely) Indonesia, which have more local competitors.Of course, traffic doesn't always translate to GMV. But for a shopping app where most people will use the app to buy something, it's a decent proxy. A third party estimates that Shopee accounts for57%of all e-commerce in Southeast Asia. It's Shopee's dominance in the mobile app ranks and market share that make me consider it the Amazon of Southeast Asia.So why would a company with so much potential sell off?After the recent earnings report, some analysts expressed concern that Shopee is branching out into other countries like Poland and Mexico before validating its business model in the current markets. In these countries, Shopee has less of a presence; it's bounced between the 3-5 spots on the Mexico App Store for shopping apps, and between spots 1 and 3 in Poland. Although analysts hate uncertainty - and the CEO's comments that they don't have a concrete measure of success in these earlier stage countries won't help with that - Shopee has a history of entering new countries successfully and I am willing to give management some time to try expanding more. After all, if they're successful, then it could drive even more unexpected growth in the future.Another complaint from analysts was that the basket size (average purchase size) is trending down. While that could also have contributed to the recent selloff, it's hard to complain when the overall sales increased a lot despite a decrease in basket size.The company raised its guidance for e-commerce again in Q3, now guiding for $5.0B-$5.2B in 2021 e-commerce revenue. That's 75%-100% growth in Q4 and about 135% growth for the year. These are much more exciting numbers than the gaming side, although the guidance still implies a slight deceleration in Q4. But compared to Amazon's $340B in 2020 e-commerce sales, Shopee looks like it's just scratched the surface. E-commerce is at only11%penetration in Southeast Asia compared to18.7%in the USA, and Southeast Asia economies are generally growing faster than the USA's.Despite being in a blue skies industry, it's more difficult to value the e-commerce segment because it operates at a loss (whereas the gaming segment is highly profitable). Shopee's success is not guaranteed because it's not clear at this point whether the platform can become profitable while retaining its market share. Stocks like this tend to experience more volatility, which could partially explain the recent selloff.For unprofitable software companies, I like to use the Rule of 40 to assess the business. But it's difficult to apply this rule to a more cyclical e-commerce company with naturally lower margins. Even so, it's worth noting that despite being unprofitable, Sea's Rule of 40 score of 104 is better than most SaaS companies', and also better than e-commerce peers Amazon (21), MercadoLibre (73), and Alibaba (43).To understand Shopee's terminal valuation once it becomes profitable, we can look at industry peers. Amazon is one profitable and slower-growing peer, and it trades at 4x P/S. AWS pushes this number up, but Amazon's high exposure to first-party sales offsets that. Other e-commerce marketplace peers trade at similar valuations: Alibaba at 3x P/S, MercadoLibre at 9x P/S. All of these valuations are basically all-time lows.If Shopee keeps doubling revenue over the next couple of years (which it's easily done every year since 2016), becomes profitable (which scaling up tends to help with), and will have Amazon's P/S multiple in two years, then at 16 P/S today it would trade flat for two years. But if it keeps growing much faster than Amazon over a longer period like a decade, and/or if the overall industry multiples expand to more normal historical levels, then even at 16x P/S this segment has potential upside. On the other hand, if it stops growing or never becomes profitable then investors will be very disappointed at any P/S.Given this wide range of outcomes, each person is going to have their own way of valuing this segment. For me, when I look at Shopee's mobile dominance, relatively small current size, the funding coming in from Garena, and the precedent set by Amazon, Alibaba, and MercadoLibre for the sustainable long-term success of this business model, I am optimistic about this segment's future. I recognize that it's currently an unprofitable and thus risky segment, but I also see the massive potential.So I am happy paying a 16x P/S multiple, which values the e-commerce segment at $83.2B. Some people will call that way too high, and those people will probably never get a chance to invest in this company, for better or for worse.Thus, with just Garena and Shopee, I have Sea being worth $106.7B. Its current market cap is $123.1B. To account for the difference, let's look at the other parts of Sea.FinTech & InvestmentsThe easiest addition to my computed valuation is Sea's $12B cash pile, partially offset by $4B in debt. This adds some nice optionality to the company and ensures that it won't be bankrupt any time soon despite losing money with Shopee. Adding in the $8B cash difference puts my computed valuation at $114.7B, just $8.4B short of the actual valuation.Then there is Sea's FinTech arm, SeaMoney. The main product here is a mobile wallet, which was responsible for $4.6B in payment volume in the last quarter (~$20B over a year). This segment accounted for $132 million in Q3 revenue, up a whopping 818% year over year. This implies a \"take rate\" of 2.9%, which is even better than established FinTech companies like Visa (V). Because of this high take rate, I'm not worried about SeaMoney losing money while it scales.Despite SeaMoney being a small segment, it's now reaching a point where it can be factored into the valuation. Maybe it's only worth a couple of billion, but this is just the start. Five years ago, nobody would have expected that an e-commerce platform accounting for 5% of Sea's sales would today be worth more than the gaming segment. But Sea's management - combined with Garena's ability to fund new segments and drive their viral adoption - made it happen. It's certainly not guaranteed that Sea will have the same success with FinTech, but there is precedent for it.If one day this segment is worth a third or more of Sea (in 2020, FinTech accounted for 36% of MercadoLibre's revenue) then getting it for just 7% of the business today will be well worth it, even if that implies a somewhat high 16x P/S multiple for the segment today. Actually, this multiple is already lower than Visa's, Mastercard's (NYSE:MA), and Affirm's (NASDAQ:AFRM). Realistically, a segment growing at 818% year over year should probably get a higher multiple than these slower-growing companies', but we don't even need to speculate about what a fair multiple is, since we can reach Sea's current valuation by using 16x P/S in my model valuation.One way this segment could grow even more is through the introduction of more products besides the mobile wallet. Sea noted in their recent earnings that they have started \"early initiatives in other digital financial services such as buy now pay later, digital bank, and insurtech.\" These guys sure know how to hop on the latest high growth trend.Finally, there's the investments arm. Sea is investing in early-stage tech companies, especially in Southeast Asia. There's strong precedent for companies like Tencent (which is itself an investor in Sea) and Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) managing successful investment portfolios that ultimately factor meaningfully into their valuation. Right now Sea's investment arm is very early stage, so I don't include it in my valuation model. But it doesn't have to be factored in to justify the current share price. It's just one more area that might be worth a large part of Sea one day.ConclusionLooking at each of Sea's segments, my valuation model indicates that Sea is fairly valued today. However, my model doesn't account for the significant optionality of the newer segments. Just like e-commerce did over the last five years, FinTech (and/or investments) could grow to become a very large part of Sea's business. With the FinTech segment currently growing at 818% year over year, it doesn't take much imagination to see how this happens. Just another year or two of growth at something close to that rate will make the FinTech arm impossible for investors to ignore.This optionality combined general strength in each business has allowed Sea to post an average revenue beat of 7% over the past year. Earnings haven't been as strong, and I expect that to be the main point of contention with my valuation model, as is the case for most unprofitable companies. In particular, I expect some readers will disagree with my valuation of the e-commerce segment. But even if you drop e-commerce all the way down to 5x P/S (a multiple seen today by much slower growing e-commerce companies) that implies 54% downside from today's prices. It's a steep drop for sure, but most companies in today's market would be looking at such a decline if one were to use the most conservative valuation standards possible.Only fast-growing companies like Sea can quickly offset such a decline with revenue growth. As a result, the businesses with the most long-term potential will hardly ever trade at the most conservative valuation possible. And Sea certainly has long-term potential. It's one of the few high-growth companies I own that I could see reaching a trillion-dollar market cap this decade.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2941,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":879078741,"gmtCreate":1636674029155,"gmtModify":1636674029155,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yey","listText":"Yey","text":"Yey","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879078741","repostId":"1174358718","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":700,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607196998,"gmtCreate":1639495073155,"gmtModify":1639495073259,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607196998","repostId":"1155236279","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":678,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692235271,"gmtCreate":1640974501745,"gmtModify":1640974501869,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I like it","listText":"I like it","text":"I like it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692235271","repostId":"1150283067","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150283067","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1640962811,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1150283067?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-31 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五4个最大的价格目标变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150283067","media":"Benzinga","summary":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. X","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从6美元上调至8美元，涨幅为24.21%。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%至2.89美元。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>Rosenblatt将Synaptics Incorporated SYNA+0.75%目标价从290美元上调至345美元。Synaptics股价周四下跌1.6%，收于287.70美元。</blockquote></p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>HC Wainwright&amp;Co.将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从4.25美元上调至5.4美元。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%，至2.89美元。</blockquote></p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>巴克莱将星座品牌公司STZ+0.19%目标价从268美元上调至271美元。Constellation股价在盘前交易中下跌0.2%，至249.00美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五4个最大的价格目标变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday<blockquote>周五4个最大的价格目标变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-31 23:00</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>SVB Leerink将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从6美元上调至8美元，涨幅为24.21%。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%至2.89美元。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>Rosenblatt将Synaptics Incorporated SYNA+0.75%目标价从290美元上调至345美元。Synaptics股价周四下跌1.6%，收于287.70美元。</blockquote></p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>HC Wainwright&amp;Co.将Xeris Biopharma Holdings，Inc.的目标股价从4.25美元上调至5.4美元。Xeris Biopharma股价在盘前交易中上涨18.9%，至2.89美元。</blockquote></p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p><blockquote>巴克莱将星座品牌公司STZ+0.19%目标价从268美元上调至271美元。Constellation股价在盘前交易中下跌0.2%，至249.00美元。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STZ":"星座品牌","XERS":"Xeris制药","SYNA":"Synaptics Incorporated"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150283067","content_text":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.HC Wainwright & Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STZ":0.9,"XERS":0.9,"SYNA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2144,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141453,"gmtCreate":1640884710388,"gmtModify":1640884710476,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141453","repostId":"1121842221","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121842221","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640874762,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121842221?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks Rise as Dow and S&P 500 Aim to Build on Records<blockquote>道琼斯指数和标普500的目标是再创历史新高，股市上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121842221","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record high","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record highs in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>美国股市周四上涨，此前标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数在前一交易日创下历史新高。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained about 150 points. The S&amp;P 500 rose 0.2%. The Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约150点。标普500上涨0.2%。纳斯达克综合指数上涨0.2%。</blockquote></p><p>Thursday is the second-last trading session of 2021. The end of the year is a historically strong period for stocks, which has been dubbed the “Santa Claus rally.”</p><p><blockquote>周四是2021年倒数第二个交易日。年底是股市历史上的强势时期，被称为“圣诞老人反弹”。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has risen during the period — the last five trading days of the year followed by the first two session in January — 78.5% of the time since 1928, according to Bank of America.</p><p><blockquote>根据美银的数据，自1928年以来，标普500在此期间（一年的最后五个交易日以及1月份的前两个交易日）上涨的时间为78.5%。</blockquote></p><p>“Santa has been good to investors this holiday season, and we look for another year of positive returns in 2022,” said Scott Wren, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.</p><p><blockquote>富国银行投资研究所高级全球市场策略师Scott Wren表示：“圣诞老人在这个假期对投资者来说很好，我们期待2022年又是一年的正回报。”</blockquote></p><p>Biogen slid 6.5% in the premarket Thursday after Samsung denied a report in The Korea Economic Daily that it was in talks to buy Biogen. Biogen shares had surged 9.5% on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>在三星否认《韩国经济日报》有关其正在洽谈收购百健(Biogen)的报道后，百健(Biogen)周四盘前下跌6.5%。Biogen股价周三飙升9.5%。</blockquote></p><p>Jobless claims last week came in lower than expected, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Initial claims totaled 198,000 for the week ended Dec. 25, while economists surveyed by Dow Jones projected 205,000.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周四报告称，上周申请失业救济人数低于预期。截至12月25日当周，初请失业金人数总计198,000人，而道琼斯调查的经济学家预计为205,000人。</blockquote></p><p>On Wednesday the S&amp;P 500 posted its 70th record close of the year. This year has seen the second-highest number of record closes for the benchmark index during a calendar year, trailing just 1995′s 77 record closing highs. The Dow also closed at its first high since November and saw its sixth-straight positive session.</p><p><blockquote>周三，标普500公布了今年第70个收盘纪录。今年该基准指数创下历年收盘纪录数量第二高，仅次于1995年创下的77个收盘纪录高点。道琼斯指数也收于11月以来的首个高点，并连续第六个交易日上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major averages are in the green for December. The S&amp;P and Dow are on pace for a second positive month in the last three, while the Nasdaq Composite is on track for a third straight month of gains.</p><p><blockquote>12月份三大股指均呈绿色。标准普尔指数和道琼斯指数有望在过去三个月中连续第二个月上涨，而纳斯达克综合指数有望连续第三个月上涨。</blockquote></p><p>For the year, the S&amp;P is up more than 27% and the Dow is up more than 19%. The Nasdaq has gained roughly 22.3%, while the Russell 2000 is up nearly 14%.</p><p><blockquote>今年，标准普尔指数上涨了27%以上，道琼斯指数上涨了19%以上。纳斯达克上涨约22.3%，而罗素2000指数上涨近14%。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks Rise as Dow and S&P 500 Aim to Build on Records<blockquote>道琼斯指数和标普500的目标是再创历史新高，股市上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks Rise as Dow and S&P 500 Aim to Build on Records<blockquote>道琼斯指数和标普500的目标是再创历史新高，股市上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 22:32</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record highs in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>美国股市周四上涨，此前标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数在前一交易日创下历史新高。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained about 150 points. The S&amp;P 500 rose 0.2%. The Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约150点。标普500上涨0.2%。纳斯达克综合指数上涨0.2%。</blockquote></p><p>Thursday is the second-last trading session of 2021. The end of the year is a historically strong period for stocks, which has been dubbed the “Santa Claus rally.”</p><p><blockquote>周四是2021年倒数第二个交易日。年底是股市历史上的强势时期，被称为“圣诞老人反弹”。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has risen during the period — the last five trading days of the year followed by the first two session in January — 78.5% of the time since 1928, according to Bank of America.</p><p><blockquote>根据美银的数据，自1928年以来，标普500在此期间（一年的最后五个交易日以及1月份的前两个交易日）上涨的时间为78.5%。</blockquote></p><p>“Santa has been good to investors this holiday season, and we look for another year of positive returns in 2022,” said Scott Wren, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.</p><p><blockquote>富国银行投资研究所高级全球市场策略师Scott Wren表示：“圣诞老人在这个假期对投资者来说很好，我们期待2022年又是一年的正回报。”</blockquote></p><p>Biogen slid 6.5% in the premarket Thursday after Samsung denied a report in The Korea Economic Daily that it was in talks to buy Biogen. Biogen shares had surged 9.5% on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>在三星否认《韩国经济日报》有关其正在洽谈收购百健(Biogen)的报道后，百健(Biogen)周四盘前下跌6.5%。Biogen股价周三飙升9.5%。</blockquote></p><p>Jobless claims last week came in lower than expected, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Initial claims totaled 198,000 for the week ended Dec. 25, while economists surveyed by Dow Jones projected 205,000.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周四报告称，上周申请失业救济人数低于预期。截至12月25日当周，初请失业金人数总计198,000人，而道琼斯调查的经济学家预计为205,000人。</blockquote></p><p>On Wednesday the S&amp;P 500 posted its 70th record close of the year. This year has seen the second-highest number of record closes for the benchmark index during a calendar year, trailing just 1995′s 77 record closing highs. The Dow also closed at its first high since November and saw its sixth-straight positive session.</p><p><blockquote>周三，标普500公布了今年第70个收盘纪录。今年该基准指数创下历年收盘纪录数量第二高，仅次于1995年创下的77个收盘纪录高点。道琼斯指数也收于11月以来的首个高点，并连续第六个交易日上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major averages are in the green for December. The S&amp;P and Dow are on pace for a second positive month in the last three, while the Nasdaq Composite is on track for a third straight month of gains.</p><p><blockquote>12月份三大股指均呈绿色。标准普尔指数和道琼斯指数有望在过去三个月中连续第二个月上涨，而纳斯达克综合指数有望连续第三个月上涨。</blockquote></p><p>For the year, the S&amp;P is up more than 27% and the Dow is up more than 19%. The Nasdaq has gained roughly 22.3%, while the Russell 2000 is up nearly 14%.</p><p><blockquote>今年，标准普尔指数上涨了27%以上，道琼斯指数上涨了19%以上。纳斯达克上涨约22.3%，而罗素2000指数上涨近14%。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121842221","content_text":"U.S. stocks rose Thursday after the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average reached new record highs in the previous session.The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained about 150 points. The S&P 500 rose 0.2%. The Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.2%.Thursday is the second-last trading session of 2021. The end of the year is a historically strong period for stocks, which has been dubbed the “Santa Claus rally.”The S&P 500 has risen during the period — the last five trading days of the year followed by the first two session in January — 78.5% of the time since 1928, according to Bank of America.“Santa has been good to investors this holiday season, and we look for another year of positive returns in 2022,” said Scott Wren, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.Biogen slid 6.5% in the premarket Thursday after Samsung denied a report in The Korea Economic Daily that it was in talks to buy Biogen. Biogen shares had surged 9.5% on Wednesday.Jobless claims last week came in lower than expected, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Initial claims totaled 198,000 for the week ended Dec. 25, while economists surveyed by Dow Jones projected 205,000.On Wednesday the S&P 500 posted its 70th record close of the year. This year has seen the second-highest number of record closes for the benchmark index during a calendar year, trailing just 1995′s 77 record closing highs. The Dow also closed at its first high since November and saw its sixth-straight positive session.All three major averages are in the green for December. The S&P and Dow are on pace for a second positive month in the last three, while the Nasdaq Composite is on track for a third straight month of gains.For the year, the S&P is up more than 27% and the Dow is up more than 19%. The Nasdaq has gained roughly 22.3%, while the Russell 2000 is up nearly 14%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2681,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141236,"gmtCreate":1640884679254,"gmtModify":1640884679344,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Think so","listText":"Think so","text":"Think so","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141236","repostId":"1139674064","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139674064","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640878484,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1139674064?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 23:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lucid Vs. NIO Stock: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?<blockquote>Lucid与蔚来股票：哪只电动汽车股票更值得购买？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139674064","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThe EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and gre","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body><b>总结</b></body></html></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>The EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.</li><li>Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and great tech, which allow them to demand high ASPs.</li><li>NIO seems like the lower-risk choice among these two, and due to being a lot farther along from a production ramp perspective, it is, I believe, the better choice today.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe01e445aec1bb67f1b8d810f551603\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1025\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>电动汽车市场的竞争越来越激烈。拥有强大的品牌或技术对于公司脱颖而出非常重要。</li><li>蔚来和LCID都拥有强大的品牌和出色的技术，这使得它们能够要求很高的平均售价。</li><li>蔚来似乎是这两者中风险较低的选择，而且由于从产量增长的角度来看，它走得更远，我相信它是当今更好的选择。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock社论来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p>The EV space has brought up many companies that do not seem too viable in the long run, but there are also strong contenders apart from Tesla (TSLA). In this report, we&#39;ll pit Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO) against each other - two of the most interesting EV players that combine strong brands and high-end technological capabilities. In this report, we&#39;ll take a deeper dive into the tech and product side and will look at individual risks for both companies. Overall, I do believe that NIO is the more attractive choice among these two at current prices.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域催生了许多从长远来看似乎不太可行的公司，但除了特斯拉（TSLA）之外，也有强有力的竞争者。在本报告中，我们将对Lucid Group，Inc.(LCID)和蔚来（蔚来）进行对比，这两家最有趣的电动汽车公司结合了强大的品牌和高端技术能力。在本报告中，我们将更深入地探讨技术和产品方面，并探讨两家公司的个别风险。总体而言，我确实相信以目前的价格来看，蔚来是这两个选择中更具吸引力的。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid And NIO In The EV Market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>电动汽车市场的Lucid和蔚来</b></blockquote></p><p>The global EV market has been growing rapidly, with EV sales likely coming in a little north of six million, which is roughly twice as high as during the previous year. Clearly, EVs are a huge growth sector in the global automobile market, although it should be noted that most vehicles sold around the world are still powered by internal combustion engines. Over the years, EV market share should continue to climb rapidly, but it is not looking like EVs will dominate ICE vehicles any time soon.</p><p><blockquote>全球电动汽车市场一直在快速增长，电动汽车销量可能略高于600万辆，大约是上一年的两倍。显然，电动汽车是全球汽车市场的一个巨大增长领域，尽管应该指出的是，全球销售的大多数车辆仍然由内燃机驱动。多年来，电动汽车市场份额应该会继续快速攀升，但电动汽车似乎不会很快主导内燃机汽车。</blockquote></p><p>The market leaders in the EV space are Tesla and BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY), and, depending on how one counts plug-in hybrids, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY). NIO Inc. and Lucid Group, Inc. are not among the largest companies for now. NIO is selling around 11,000 vehicles a month right now, which translates into a ~130,000 annual sales pace. Sales have been growing quickly, however, which is why NIO will most likely sell more than 130,000 vehicles next year, as deliveries should continue to climb sequentially. Lucid is way smaller for now, in terms of deliveries, as the company has likely sold a couple of hundred vehicles this year. Next year, Lucid Group targets deliveries of around 20,000 vehicles - up by a lot versus 2021, but still a relatively small number compared to the deliveries NIO and many other peers will hit next year.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域的市场领导者是特斯拉和比亚迪（OTCPK：BYDDY），以及大众汽车（OTCPK：VWAGY），具体取决于插电式混合动力车的计算方式。蔚来和Lucid Group，Inc.目前还不是最大的公司。蔚来目前每月销售约11,000辆汽车，相当于年销量约130,000辆。然而，销量一直在快速增长，这就是为什么蔚来明年的销量很可能会超过13万辆，因为交付量应该会继续连续攀升。就交付量而言，Lucid目前的规模要小得多，因为该公司今年可能已售出数百辆汽车。明年，Lucid Group的目标是交付约20,000辆汽车，比2021年增长很多，但与蔚来和许多其他同行明年的交付量相比，这个数字仍然相对较小。</blockquote></p><p><b>LCID Vs. NIO&#39;s Past Quarterly Performance</b></p><p><blockquote><b>LCID与蔚来过去的季度表现</b></blockquote></p><p>As noted above, NIO&#39;s sales performance was way stronger than that of Lucid over the last three months, but that was hardly a surprise as LCID just began delivering vehicles to customers. On a share price basis, however, Lucid fared better:</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，蔚来过去三个月的销售业绩远强于Lucid，但这并不奇怪，因为LCID刚刚开始向客户交付车辆。然而，从股价来看，Lucid的表现更好：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7a6e7cb1b1485f32cc25ade9f387a5b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Over the last three months, LCID is up close to 50%, whereas NIO saw its shares drop by close to 20% over the same time frame. In NIO&#39;s case, macro worries about Chinese regulation played a role, whereas LCID benefitted a lot from growing enthusiasm for US-based EV players caused by Rivian&#39;s (RIVN) huge IPO success. On top of that, the start of deliveries also attracted new investors to Lucid&#39;s stock. If analysts are correct, NIO is the much better value today:</p><p><blockquote>过去三个月，LCID上涨了近50%，而蔚来的股价同期下跌了近20%。就蔚来而言，对中国监管的宏观担忧发挥了作用，而LCID则从Rivian(RIVN)IPO的巨大成功引发的对美国电动汽车企业日益增长的热情中受益匪浅。最重要的是，交付的开始也吸引了新投资者购买Lucid的股票。如果分析师是正确的，那么蔚来今天的价值要高得多：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b1d0939d657b284e25d8447ccb211b5\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shares are trading at less than half the consensus price target, which implies 100%+ upside over the next year, whereas LCID is trading almost perfectly in line with the current consensus price target - which implies no upside over the next year. NIO&#39;s underperformance over the last quarter thus seems to position the company well for a strong performance from the current level, whereas the same can&#39;t be said about Lucid.</p><p><blockquote>该股的交易价格不到共识价格目标的一半，这意味着明年有100%以上的上涨空间，而LCID的交易价格几乎完全符合当前的共识价格目标，这意味着明年没有上涨空间。因此，蔚来上个季度的表现不佳似乎使该公司在当前水平上表现强劲，而Lucid则不然。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid Vs. NIO Key Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid与蔚来关键指标</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>Let&#39;s take a deeper look at the tech of the two companies, as well as at their branding, and their specific key risks. Both NIO and Lucid are active in the high-end segment of the EV industry, selling vehicles with ASPs well north of the average Tesla. NIO&#39;s ASP is around $70,000, and Lucid&#39;s ASP is even higher than that for now, as the company is selling the most expensive Air<i>Dream</i>version first. Tesla, the current EV leader, has an ASP of around $50,000. Both NIO and Tesla are thus operating in a more luxurious, higher-end segment of the market compared to Tesla. How are these companies able to demand way higher ASPs than Tesla? There are several factors at play, including branding, but one of the most important factors is their great tech.</p><p><blockquote>让我们更深入地了解这两家公司的技术、品牌及其具体的主要风险。蔚来和Lucid都活跃在电动汽车行业的高端领域，销售的汽车平均售价远高于特斯拉的平均水平。蔚来的平均售价约为7万美元，Lucid的平均售价目前甚至更高，因为该公司销售的是最昂贵的Air<i>梦想</i>版本优先。特斯拉是目前电动汽车的领导者，其平均售价约为50,000美元。因此，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和特斯拉都在更豪华、更高端的细分市场运营。这些公司怎么能要求比特斯拉高得多的平均售价呢？有几个因素在起作用，包括品牌，但最重要的因素之一是他们出色的技术。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s battery-swapping technology, for example, allows its customers to fully &#34;recharge&#34; in a couple of minutes, while most other EVs take way longer to fully charge. Lucid doesn&#39;t employ battery-swapping, but its racing-tested 900V technology allows for both a huge range as well as for fast charging speeds - Lucid&#39;s architecture allows customers to charge up to 300 miles worth of energy in just 20 minutes. The Tesla S, for reference, uses a ~400V architecture that allows customers to recharge 200 miles in 15 minutes. Clearly, both NIO&#39;s solution, as well as Lucid&#39;s solution, seem superior compared to what Tesla is offering.</p><p><blockquote>例如，蔚来的电池交换技术允许其客户在几分钟内充满“充电”，而大多数其他电动汽车需要更长的时间才能充满电。Lucid不采用电池更换，但其经过赛车测试的900V技术既可以实现巨大的续航里程，又可以实现快速充电速度——Lucid的架构允许客户在短短20分钟内充电长达300英里的电量。作为参考，特斯拉S采用约400V架构，允许客户在15分钟内充电200英里。显然，蔚来的解决方案和Lucid的解决方案似乎都优于特斯拉提供的解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s and Lucid&#39;s tech also looks highly competitive when it comes to their respective batteries. The Lucid Air Dream has an EPA range of 520 miles, which should be sufficient for almost all use cases. NIO has a larger product portfolio compared to Lucid, but when we take a look at its top-end sedan, battery performance looks even better. The NIO ET7, with a 150kWh battery (smaller options are available, too), has a range of up to 1,000km, which equates to around 620 miles of range. Again, both NIO and Lucid perform well compared to Tesla - the flagship S Plaid has an EPA range of 350 miles. Thanks to its experience in developing and supplying racing engines for electric race cars, Lucid crafts an especially efficient engine:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid的技术在各自的电池方面看起来也很有竞争力。Lucid Air Dream的EPA续航里程为520英里，对于几乎所有用例来说都足够了。与Lucid相比，蔚来拥有更大的产品组合，但当我们看看它的高端轿车时，电池性能看起来甚至更好。蔚来ET7配备150kWh电池（也有更小的选择），续航里程可达1,000公里，相当于约620英里的续航里程。同样，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和Lucid的表现都很好——旗舰S Plaid的EPA续航里程为350英里。凭借其在为电动赛车开发和供应赛车发动机方面的经验，Lucid制造了一款特别高效的发动机：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf92a9709beceb826f2e86b3bc25dd6\" tg-width=\"1502\" tg-height=\"829\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: Lucid presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Lucid演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>A smaller, more efficient engine results in lower resource usage and reduces the weight of the vehicle, all else equal. This does, in turn, lead to a longer range, and it also allows for better handling and driving performance, all else equal. Lucid is by far not the biggest EV player today, but its engineers have developed some of the most compelling products and solutions among all currently active EV players.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件相同的情况下，更小、更高效的发动机可以降低资源使用量并减轻车辆重量。反过来，这确实会带来更长的续航里程，并且在其他条件相同的情况下，还可以实现更好的操控和驾驶性能。到目前为止，Lucid还不是当今最大的电动汽车参与者，但其工程师已经开发出了一些目前所有活跃的电动汽车参与者中最引人注目的产品和解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO puts a lot of focus on technologies that will eventually allow for autonomous driving and puts massive numbers of sensors and huge computing power in its vehicles today. The ET7 uses the following sensing units for that goal:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来非常关注最终实现自动驾驶的技术，并在当今的车辆中安装了大量传感器和巨大的计算能力。ET7使用以下传感单元来实现此目标：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b39530a306d0b27d76d36bccec0e147d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"331\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: NIO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：蔚来</span></p></blockquote></p><p>With 33 sensors that use up to 8MP, NIO&#39;s sensing capabilities easily blow away those of Tesla. The Tesla Model 3, which is, according to CEO Musk, ready for full-self-driving, only uses 8 cameras with 1.2MP each. One of NIO&#39;s sensors in the ET7 thus has almost as much sensing performance as all of the cameras in the M3 combined - and NIO uses 32 additional sensors in its model. Clearly, NIO&#39;s offering is superior - and that obviously comes at a price, as NIO is not skimping when it comes to putting the best tech in its vehicles. This is also showcased by the massive processing power of the chips NIO uses in the ET7. The ET7 uses four NVIDIA (NVDA) Orin SoCs, each of which offers slightly more than 250 trillion operations per second, which makes for combined computing power of more than 1,000 TOPS - unheard of in any production vehicle. Using four SoCs at the same time also provides for the redundancy that is required for critical systems in a self-driving scenario. it should be noted that NIO&#39;s self-driving tech is not as excellent on the software side - yet. At least for now, peers such as XPeng (XPEV) seem to employ the stronger algorithms, but that is a problem that NIO can solve over the coming quarters and years, and integrating future software in its vehicles that come with top-notch hardware shouldn&#39;t be a very difficult task. Lucid&#39;s self-driving tech, even though it doesn&#39;t get a lot of recognition yet, is not looking bad at all, either. The DreamDrive suite utilizes 32 onboard sensors, almost on par with NIO&#39;s Aquila system (and 4x more sensors compared to the M3, which is allegedly L5 ready from a hardware perspective).</p><p><blockquote>凭借33个高达800万像素的传感器，蔚来的传感能力轻松击败了特斯拉。据首席执行官马斯克称，特斯拉Model 3已准备好实现全自动驾驶，仅使用8个摄像头，每个摄像头为120万像素。因此，ET7中蔚来的一个传感器的传感性能几乎相当于M3中所有摄像头的总和，而蔚来在其车型中使用了32个额外的传感器。显然，蔚来的产品是优越的——这显然是有代价的，因为蔚来在将最好的技术应用到其车辆中时并不吝啬。蔚来在ET7中使用的芯片的巨大处理能力也证明了这一点。ET7使用四个NVIDIA(NVDA)Orin SoC，每个SoC每秒提供略高于250万亿次运算，总计算能力超过1,000 TOPS，这在任何量产车中都是闻所未闻的。同时使用四个SoC还可以提供自动驾驶场景中关键系统所需的冗余。应该指出的是，蔚来的自动驾驶技术在软件方面还没有那么出色。至少目前，小鹏汽车（XPEV）等同行似乎采用了更强大的算法，但这是蔚来可以在未来几个季度和几年内解决的问题，并将未来的软件集成到配备顶级硬件的车辆中不应该是一项非常困难的任务。Lucid的自动驾驶技术尽管尚未得到太多认可，但看起来也一点也不差。DreamDrive套件使用32个板载传感器，几乎与蔚来的Aquila系统相当（与M3相比，传感器多4倍，据称从硬件角度来看，M3已准备好L5）。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Strong tech alone doesn&#39;t make for an attractive vehicle, however, as design, manufacturing quality, etc. have to be considered as well. Luckily, both NIO and Lucid compete very well on that basis, although the data on Lucid is still limited due to the low sales numbers - not too many people have driven a Lucid Air yet, thus data about reliability, etc. is limited. NIO, however, has been selling thousands of vehicles a month for quite some time, and its users are very satisfied with the vehicles&#39; quality. CnTechPost reports that J.D. Power has rated NIO the highest-quality EV company in China, ahead of Tesla. Lucid is not active in the country yet, but test drives by a wide range of auto journalists and magazines have generally resulted in very positive reviews. Both NIO and Lucid thus look strong from a design, quality, and tech perspective, with NIO putting more focus on customer-friendly items such as battery-swapping and driving assistance, whereas Lucid puts more focus on engine performance, battery tech, etc. Both avenues have their advantages, but I personally could see NIO benefit more from its easy-to-use, customer-friendly approach, as not too many people will buy an EV based on criteria such as the battery architecture. Still, Lucid&#39;s ability to develop high-performing vehicles should come in very handy in the highly competitive EV industry going forward.</p><p><blockquote>然而，仅靠强大的技术并不能造就一辆有吸引力的汽车，因为设计、制造质量等也必须考虑在内。幸运的是，蔚来和Lucid在此基础上竞争非常好，尽管由于销量较低，Lucid的数据仍然有限——还没有太多人驾驶过Lucid Air，因此有关可靠性等的数据有限。然而，蔚来已经有一段时间每月销售数千辆汽车，并且其用户对车辆的质量非常满意。CnTechPost报道J.D。Power将蔚来评为国内质量最高的电动汽车公司，领先于特斯拉。Lucid在该国尚未活跃，但众多汽车记者和杂志的试驾普遍获得了非常积极的评价。因此，从设计、质量和技术的角度来看，蔚来和Lucid看起来都很强大，蔚来更关注电池更换和驾驶辅助等客户友好型项目，而Lucid则更关注发动机性能、电池技术等。这两种途径都有其优势，但我个人认为蔚来从其易于使用、客户友好的方法中受益更多，因为没有太多人会根据电池架构等标准购买电动汽车。尽管如此，Lucid开发高性能汽车的能力在未来竞争激烈的电动汽车行业应该会非常方便。</blockquote></p><p>With NIO, the main risk the market seems to worry about now is regulation/politics. I personally do not believe that regulation will be a huge risk for NIO. Chinese companies never were able to compete successfully in the ICE vehicle space, but with EV technologies bringing change to the entire global automobile industry, China saw its chance to become a global automobile powerhouse. Hurting NIO and other Chinese EV players would run contrary to those goals, which is why I believe that China is more interested in nurturing its own EV players, including NIO, instead of hurting them. Still, the market puts a discount on every Chinese company today, and that holds true for NIO as well - which might be a good thing for those seeking to buy into the company at a below-average valuation.</p><p><blockquote>对于蔚来，市场现在担心的主要风险似乎是监管/政治。我个人不认为监管会给蔚来带来巨大风险。中国公司从未能够在内燃机汽车领域成功竞争，但随着电动汽车技术给整个全球汽车行业带来变革，中国看到了成为全球汽车强国的机会。伤害蔚来和其他中国电动汽车企业将与这些目标背道而驰，这就是为什么我认为中国更有兴趣培养自己的电动汽车企业，包括蔚来，而不是伤害他们。尽管如此，如今市场对每家中国公司都给予了折扣，蔚来也是如此——这对于那些寻求以低于平均水平的估值买入该公司的人来说可能是一件好事。</blockquote></p><p>For Lucid, regulation doesn&#39;t seem like an important risk. Instead, the main risks here are the high valuation and the production ramp. As Tesla has shown, ramping up vehicle production is no easy task. The company oftentimes had to battle with delays and other issues, sometimes summarized as &#34;Production Hell&#34;. The same could hold true for Lucid, which will have to ramp up production at a high speed in the coming months and quarters in order to meet its ambitious production goals. It&#39;s not a certainty that it will experience similar issues to other manufacturers, of course, but due to a lack of experience, this seems a considerable risk worth keeping an eye on. On top of that, LCID&#39;s high valuation could be a considerable risk - shares trade at around 30x next year&#39;s expected revenue, and there is no guarantee at all that those revenues will actually be generated.</p><p><blockquote>对于Lucid来说，监管似乎并不是一个重要的风险。相反，这里的主要风险是高估值和产量增加。正如特斯拉所表明的那样，提高汽车产量并不是一件容易的事。该公司经常不得不与延误和其他问题作斗争，有时被总结为“生产地狱”。Lucid可能也是如此，该公司将不得不在未来几个月和几个季度高速提高产量，以实现其雄心勃勃的生产目标。当然，不能确定它会遇到与其他制造商类似的问题，但由于缺乏经验，这似乎是一个值得关注的相当大的风险。最重要的是，LCID的高估值可能是一个相当大的风险——股票交易价格约为明年预期收入的30倍，而且根本不能保证这些收入会真正产生。</blockquote></p><p><b>Is Lucid Or NIO Stock The Better Buy?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid或蔚来股票更值得购买吗？</b></blockquote></p><p>Both NIO and Lucid have attractive products that seem highly competitive in the EV market that is seeing more and more entrants. I do believe that both companies will have operational success over the coming years, driven by strong tech, attractive brands, and compelling product quality. Operational growth does not necessarily result in share price growth, however, as valuations can be a major hurdle when one buys at a price that is too high.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid都拥有有吸引力的产品，这些产品在越来越多进入者的电动汽车市场中似乎极具竞争力。我确实相信，在强大的技术、有吸引力的品牌和引人注目的产品质量的推动下，两家公司将在未来几年取得运营成功。然而，运营增长并不一定会导致股价增长，因为当以过高的价格买入时，估值可能会成为主要障碍。</blockquote></p><p>In NIO&#39;s case, that does not seem like an overly large risk, as shares are inexpensive relative to how other EV players are valued - NIO trades at ~4x next year&#39;s expected revenue, which represents a clear discount compared to LCID, RIVN, TSLA, and so on. Lucid, on the other hand, is trading at a very premium valuation of 30x next year&#39;s sales.</p><p><blockquote>就蔚来而言，这似乎并不是一个过大的风险，因为相对于其他电动汽车公司的估值而言，其股价并不昂贵——蔚来的交易价格约为明年预期收入的4倍，与LCID、RIVN、TSLA相比有明显的折扣，等等。另一方面，Lucid的估值非常高，是明年销售额的30倍。</blockquote></p><p>I do believe that, based on its larger size, more established operations, better progress in ramping production, and due to its much more reasonable valuation, NIO is the better pick among these two today.The recent share price decline makes for an attractive entry point for those interested in owning this top-notch Chinese EV player.</p><p><blockquote>我确实相信，基于其更大的规模、更成熟的业务、更好的增产进展，以及更合理的估值，蔚来是当今这两家公司中更好的选择。对于那些有兴趣拥有这家顶级中国电动汽车公司的人来说，最近的股价下跌是一个有吸引力的切入点。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lucid Vs. NIO Stock: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?<blockquote>Lucid与蔚来股票：哪只电动汽车股票更值得购买？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLucid Vs. NIO Stock: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?<blockquote>Lucid与蔚来股票：哪只电动汽车股票更值得购买？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-30 23:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body><b>总结</b></body></html></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>The EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.</li><li>Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and great tech, which allow them to demand high ASPs.</li><li>NIO seems like the lower-risk choice among these two, and due to being a lot farther along from a production ramp perspective, it is, I believe, the better choice today.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe01e445aec1bb67f1b8d810f551603\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1025\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>电动汽车市场的竞争越来越激烈。拥有强大的品牌或技术对于公司脱颖而出非常重要。</li><li>蔚来和LCID都拥有强大的品牌和出色的技术，这使得它们能够要求很高的平均售价。</li><li>蔚来似乎是这两者中风险较低的选择，而且由于从产量增长的角度来看，它走得更远，我相信它是当今更好的选择。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Trygve Finkelsen/iStock社论来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p>The EV space has brought up many companies that do not seem too viable in the long run, but there are also strong contenders apart from Tesla (TSLA). In this report, we&#39;ll pit Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO) against each other - two of the most interesting EV players that combine strong brands and high-end technological capabilities. In this report, we&#39;ll take a deeper dive into the tech and product side and will look at individual risks for both companies. Overall, I do believe that NIO is the more attractive choice among these two at current prices.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域催生了许多从长远来看似乎不太可行的公司，但除了特斯拉（TSLA）之外，也有强有力的竞争者。在本报告中，我们将对Lucid Group，Inc.(LCID)和蔚来（蔚来）进行对比，这两家最有趣的电动汽车公司结合了强大的品牌和高端技术能力。在本报告中，我们将更深入地探讨技术和产品方面，并探讨两家公司的个别风险。总体而言，我确实相信以目前的价格来看，蔚来是这两个选择中更具吸引力的。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid And NIO In The EV Market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>电动汽车市场的Lucid和蔚来</b></blockquote></p><p>The global EV market has been growing rapidly, with EV sales likely coming in a little north of six million, which is roughly twice as high as during the previous year. Clearly, EVs are a huge growth sector in the global automobile market, although it should be noted that most vehicles sold around the world are still powered by internal combustion engines. Over the years, EV market share should continue to climb rapidly, but it is not looking like EVs will dominate ICE vehicles any time soon.</p><p><blockquote>全球电动汽车市场一直在快速增长，电动汽车销量可能略高于600万辆，大约是上一年的两倍。显然，电动汽车是全球汽车市场的一个巨大增长领域，尽管应该指出的是，全球销售的大多数车辆仍然由内燃机驱动。多年来，电动汽车市场份额应该会继续快速攀升，但电动汽车似乎不会很快主导内燃机汽车。</blockquote></p><p>The market leaders in the EV space are Tesla and BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY), and, depending on how one counts plug-in hybrids, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY). NIO Inc. and Lucid Group, Inc. are not among the largest companies for now. NIO is selling around 11,000 vehicles a month right now, which translates into a ~130,000 annual sales pace. Sales have been growing quickly, however, which is why NIO will most likely sell more than 130,000 vehicles next year, as deliveries should continue to climb sequentially. Lucid is way smaller for now, in terms of deliveries, as the company has likely sold a couple of hundred vehicles this year. Next year, Lucid Group targets deliveries of around 20,000 vehicles - up by a lot versus 2021, but still a relatively small number compared to the deliveries NIO and many other peers will hit next year.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域的市场领导者是特斯拉和比亚迪（OTCPK：BYDDY），以及大众汽车（OTCPK：VWAGY），具体取决于插电式混合动力车的计算方式。蔚来和Lucid Group，Inc.目前还不是最大的公司。蔚来目前每月销售约11,000辆汽车，相当于年销量约130,000辆。然而，销量一直在快速增长，这就是为什么蔚来明年的销量很可能会超过13万辆，因为交付量应该会继续连续攀升。就交付量而言，Lucid目前的规模要小得多，因为该公司今年可能已售出数百辆汽车。明年，Lucid Group的目标是交付约20,000辆汽车，比2021年增长很多，但与蔚来和许多其他同行明年的交付量相比，这个数字仍然相对较小。</blockquote></p><p><b>LCID Vs. NIO&#39;s Past Quarterly Performance</b></p><p><blockquote><b>LCID与蔚来过去的季度表现</b></blockquote></p><p>As noted above, NIO&#39;s sales performance was way stronger than that of Lucid over the last three months, but that was hardly a surprise as LCID just began delivering vehicles to customers. On a share price basis, however, Lucid fared better:</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，蔚来过去三个月的销售业绩远强于Lucid，但这并不奇怪，因为LCID刚刚开始向客户交付车辆。然而，从股价来看，Lucid的表现更好：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7a6e7cb1b1485f32cc25ade9f387a5b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Over the last three months, LCID is up close to 50%, whereas NIO saw its shares drop by close to 20% over the same time frame. In NIO&#39;s case, macro worries about Chinese regulation played a role, whereas LCID benefitted a lot from growing enthusiasm for US-based EV players caused by Rivian&#39;s (RIVN) huge IPO success. On top of that, the start of deliveries also attracted new investors to Lucid&#39;s stock. If analysts are correct, NIO is the much better value today:</p><p><blockquote>过去三个月，LCID上涨了近50%，而蔚来的股价同期下跌了近20%。就蔚来而言，对中国监管的宏观担忧发挥了作用，而LCID则从Rivian(RIVN)IPO的巨大成功引发的对美国电动汽车企业日益增长的热情中受益匪浅。最重要的是，交付的开始也吸引了新投资者购买Lucid的股票。如果分析师是正确的，那么蔚来今天的价值要高得多：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b1d0939d657b284e25d8447ccb211b5\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Shares are trading at less than half the consensus price target, which implies 100%+ upside over the next year, whereas LCID is trading almost perfectly in line with the current consensus price target - which implies no upside over the next year. NIO&#39;s underperformance over the last quarter thus seems to position the company well for a strong performance from the current level, whereas the same can&#39;t be said about Lucid.</p><p><blockquote>该股的交易价格不到共识价格目标的一半，这意味着明年有100%以上的上涨空间，而LCID的交易价格几乎完全符合当前的共识价格目标，这意味着明年没有上涨空间。因此，蔚来上个季度的表现不佳似乎使该公司在当前水平上表现强劲，而Lucid则不然。</blockquote></p><p><b>Lucid Vs. NIO Key Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid与蔚来关键指标</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>Let&#39;s take a deeper look at the tech of the two companies, as well as at their branding, and their specific key risks. Both NIO and Lucid are active in the high-end segment of the EV industry, selling vehicles with ASPs well north of the average Tesla. NIO&#39;s ASP is around $70,000, and Lucid&#39;s ASP is even higher than that for now, as the company is selling the most expensive Air<i>Dream</i>version first. Tesla, the current EV leader, has an ASP of around $50,000. Both NIO and Tesla are thus operating in a more luxurious, higher-end segment of the market compared to Tesla. How are these companies able to demand way higher ASPs than Tesla? There are several factors at play, including branding, but one of the most important factors is their great tech.</p><p><blockquote>让我们更深入地了解这两家公司的技术、品牌及其具体的主要风险。蔚来和Lucid都活跃在电动汽车行业的高端领域，销售的汽车平均售价远高于特斯拉的平均水平。蔚来的平均售价约为7万美元，Lucid的平均售价目前甚至更高，因为该公司销售的是最昂贵的Air<i>梦想</i>版本优先。特斯拉是目前电动汽车的领导者，其平均售价约为50,000美元。因此，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和特斯拉都在更豪华、更高端的细分市场运营。这些公司怎么能要求比特斯拉高得多的平均售价呢？有几个因素在起作用，包括品牌，但最重要的因素之一是他们出色的技术。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s battery-swapping technology, for example, allows its customers to fully &#34;recharge&#34; in a couple of minutes, while most other EVs take way longer to fully charge. Lucid doesn&#39;t employ battery-swapping, but its racing-tested 900V technology allows for both a huge range as well as for fast charging speeds - Lucid&#39;s architecture allows customers to charge up to 300 miles worth of energy in just 20 minutes. The Tesla S, for reference, uses a ~400V architecture that allows customers to recharge 200 miles in 15 minutes. Clearly, both NIO&#39;s solution, as well as Lucid&#39;s solution, seem superior compared to what Tesla is offering.</p><p><blockquote>例如，蔚来的电池交换技术允许其客户在几分钟内充满“充电”，而大多数其他电动汽车需要更长的时间才能充满电。Lucid不采用电池更换，但其经过赛车测试的900V技术既可以实现巨大的续航里程，又可以实现快速充电速度——Lucid的架构允许客户在短短20分钟内充电长达300英里的电量。作为参考，特斯拉S采用约400V架构，允许客户在15分钟内充电200英里。显然，蔚来的解决方案和Lucid的解决方案似乎都优于特斯拉提供的解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO&#39;s and Lucid&#39;s tech also looks highly competitive when it comes to their respective batteries. The Lucid Air Dream has an EPA range of 520 miles, which should be sufficient for almost all use cases. NIO has a larger product portfolio compared to Lucid, but when we take a look at its top-end sedan, battery performance looks even better. The NIO ET7, with a 150kWh battery (smaller options are available, too), has a range of up to 1,000km, which equates to around 620 miles of range. Again, both NIO and Lucid perform well compared to Tesla - the flagship S Plaid has an EPA range of 350 miles. Thanks to its experience in developing and supplying racing engines for electric race cars, Lucid crafts an especially efficient engine:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid的技术在各自的电池方面看起来也很有竞争力。Lucid Air Dream的EPA续航里程为520英里，对于几乎所有用例来说都足够了。与Lucid相比，蔚来拥有更大的产品组合，但当我们看看它的高端轿车时，电池性能看起来甚至更好。蔚来ET7配备150kWh电池（也有更小的选择），续航里程可达1,000公里，相当于约620英里的续航里程。同样，与特斯拉相比，蔚来和Lucid的表现都很好——旗舰S Plaid的EPA续航里程为350英里。凭借其在为电动赛车开发和供应赛车发动机方面的经验，Lucid制造了一款特别高效的发动机：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edf92a9709beceb826f2e86b3bc25dd6\" tg-width=\"1502\" tg-height=\"829\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: Lucid presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Lucid演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p>A smaller, more efficient engine results in lower resource usage and reduces the weight of the vehicle, all else equal. This does, in turn, lead to a longer range, and it also allows for better handling and driving performance, all else equal. Lucid is by far not the biggest EV player today, but its engineers have developed some of the most compelling products and solutions among all currently active EV players.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件相同的情况下，更小、更高效的发动机可以降低资源使用量并减轻车辆重量。反过来，这确实会带来更长的续航里程，并且在其他条件相同的情况下，还可以实现更好的操控和驾驶性能。到目前为止，Lucid还不是当今最大的电动汽车参与者，但其工程师已经开发出了一些目前所有活跃的电动汽车参与者中最引人注目的产品和解决方案。</blockquote></p><p>NIO puts a lot of focus on technologies that will eventually allow for autonomous driving and puts massive numbers of sensors and huge computing power in its vehicles today. The ET7 uses the following sensing units for that goal:</p><p><blockquote>蔚来非常关注最终实现自动驾驶的技术，并在当今的车辆中安装了大量传感器和巨大的计算能力。ET7使用以下传感单元来实现此目标：</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b39530a306d0b27d76d36bccec0e147d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"331\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: NIO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：蔚来</span></p></blockquote></p><p>With 33 sensors that use up to 8MP, NIO&#39;s sensing capabilities easily blow away those of Tesla. The Tesla Model 3, which is, according to CEO Musk, ready for full-self-driving, only uses 8 cameras with 1.2MP each. One of NIO&#39;s sensors in the ET7 thus has almost as much sensing performance as all of the cameras in the M3 combined - and NIO uses 32 additional sensors in its model. Clearly, NIO&#39;s offering is superior - and that obviously comes at a price, as NIO is not skimping when it comes to putting the best tech in its vehicles. This is also showcased by the massive processing power of the chips NIO uses in the ET7. The ET7 uses four NVIDIA (NVDA) Orin SoCs, each of which offers slightly more than 250 trillion operations per second, which makes for combined computing power of more than 1,000 TOPS - unheard of in any production vehicle. Using four SoCs at the same time also provides for the redundancy that is required for critical systems in a self-driving scenario. it should be noted that NIO&#39;s self-driving tech is not as excellent on the software side - yet. At least for now, peers such as XPeng (XPEV) seem to employ the stronger algorithms, but that is a problem that NIO can solve over the coming quarters and years, and integrating future software in its vehicles that come with top-notch hardware shouldn&#39;t be a very difficult task. Lucid&#39;s self-driving tech, even though it doesn&#39;t get a lot of recognition yet, is not looking bad at all, either. The DreamDrive suite utilizes 32 onboard sensors, almost on par with NIO&#39;s Aquila system (and 4x more sensors compared to the M3, which is allegedly L5 ready from a hardware perspective).</p><p><blockquote>凭借33个高达800万像素的传感器，蔚来的传感能力轻松击败了特斯拉。据首席执行官马斯克称，特斯拉Model 3已准备好实现全自动驾驶，仅使用8个摄像头，每个摄像头为120万像素。因此，ET7中蔚来的一个传感器的传感性能几乎相当于M3中所有摄像头的总和，而蔚来在其车型中使用了32个额外的传感器。显然，蔚来的产品是优越的——这显然是有代价的，因为蔚来在将最好的技术应用到其车辆中时并不吝啬。蔚来在ET7中使用的芯片的巨大处理能力也证明了这一点。ET7使用四个NVIDIA(NVDA)Orin SoC，每个SoC每秒提供略高于250万亿次运算，总计算能力超过1,000 TOPS，这在任何量产车中都是闻所未闻的。同时使用四个SoC还可以提供自动驾驶场景中关键系统所需的冗余。应该指出的是，蔚来的自动驾驶技术在软件方面还没有那么出色。至少目前，小鹏汽车（XPEV）等同行似乎采用了更强大的算法，但这是蔚来可以在未来几个季度和几年内解决的问题，并将未来的软件集成到配备顶级硬件的车辆中不应该是一项非常困难的任务。Lucid的自动驾驶技术尽管尚未得到太多认可，但看起来也一点也不差。DreamDrive套件使用32个板载传感器，几乎与蔚来的Aquila系统相当（与M3相比，传感器多4倍，据称从硬件角度来看，M3已准备好L5）。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Strong tech alone doesn&#39;t make for an attractive vehicle, however, as design, manufacturing quality, etc. have to be considered as well. Luckily, both NIO and Lucid compete very well on that basis, although the data on Lucid is still limited due to the low sales numbers - not too many people have driven a Lucid Air yet, thus data about reliability, etc. is limited. NIO, however, has been selling thousands of vehicles a month for quite some time, and its users are very satisfied with the vehicles&#39; quality. CnTechPost reports that J.D. Power has rated NIO the highest-quality EV company in China, ahead of Tesla. Lucid is not active in the country yet, but test drives by a wide range of auto journalists and magazines have generally resulted in very positive reviews. Both NIO and Lucid thus look strong from a design, quality, and tech perspective, with NIO putting more focus on customer-friendly items such as battery-swapping and driving assistance, whereas Lucid puts more focus on engine performance, battery tech, etc. Both avenues have their advantages, but I personally could see NIO benefit more from its easy-to-use, customer-friendly approach, as not too many people will buy an EV based on criteria such as the battery architecture. Still, Lucid&#39;s ability to develop high-performing vehicles should come in very handy in the highly competitive EV industry going forward.</p><p><blockquote>然而，仅靠强大的技术并不能造就一辆有吸引力的汽车，因为设计、制造质量等也必须考虑在内。幸运的是，蔚来和Lucid在此基础上竞争非常好，尽管由于销量较低，Lucid的数据仍然有限——还没有太多人驾驶过Lucid Air，因此有关可靠性等的数据有限。然而，蔚来已经有一段时间每月销售数千辆汽车，并且其用户对车辆的质量非常满意。CnTechPost报道J.D。Power将蔚来评为国内质量最高的电动汽车公司，领先于特斯拉。Lucid在该国尚未活跃，但众多汽车记者和杂志的试驾普遍获得了非常积极的评价。因此，从设计、质量和技术的角度来看，蔚来和Lucid看起来都很强大，蔚来更关注电池更换和驾驶辅助等客户友好型项目，而Lucid则更关注发动机性能、电池技术等。这两种途径都有其优势，但我个人认为蔚来从其易于使用、客户友好的方法中受益更多，因为没有太多人会根据电池架构等标准购买电动汽车。尽管如此，Lucid开发高性能汽车的能力在未来竞争激烈的电动汽车行业应该会非常方便。</blockquote></p><p>With NIO, the main risk the market seems to worry about now is regulation/politics. I personally do not believe that regulation will be a huge risk for NIO. Chinese companies never were able to compete successfully in the ICE vehicle space, but with EV technologies bringing change to the entire global automobile industry, China saw its chance to become a global automobile powerhouse. Hurting NIO and other Chinese EV players would run contrary to those goals, which is why I believe that China is more interested in nurturing its own EV players, including NIO, instead of hurting them. Still, the market puts a discount on every Chinese company today, and that holds true for NIO as well - which might be a good thing for those seeking to buy into the company at a below-average valuation.</p><p><blockquote>对于蔚来，市场现在担心的主要风险似乎是监管/政治。我个人不认为监管会给蔚来带来巨大风险。中国公司从未能够在内燃机汽车领域成功竞争，但随着电动汽车技术给整个全球汽车行业带来变革，中国看到了成为全球汽车强国的机会。伤害蔚来和其他中国电动汽车企业将与这些目标背道而驰，这就是为什么我认为中国更有兴趣培养自己的电动汽车企业，包括蔚来，而不是伤害他们。尽管如此，如今市场对每家中国公司都给予了折扣，蔚来也是如此——这对于那些寻求以低于平均水平的估值买入该公司的人来说可能是一件好事。</blockquote></p><p>For Lucid, regulation doesn&#39;t seem like an important risk. Instead, the main risks here are the high valuation and the production ramp. As Tesla has shown, ramping up vehicle production is no easy task. The company oftentimes had to battle with delays and other issues, sometimes summarized as &#34;Production Hell&#34;. The same could hold true for Lucid, which will have to ramp up production at a high speed in the coming months and quarters in order to meet its ambitious production goals. It&#39;s not a certainty that it will experience similar issues to other manufacturers, of course, but due to a lack of experience, this seems a considerable risk worth keeping an eye on. On top of that, LCID&#39;s high valuation could be a considerable risk - shares trade at around 30x next year&#39;s expected revenue, and there is no guarantee at all that those revenues will actually be generated.</p><p><blockquote>对于Lucid来说，监管似乎并不是一个重要的风险。相反，这里的主要风险是高估值和产量增加。正如特斯拉所表明的那样，提高汽车产量并不是一件容易的事。该公司经常不得不与延误和其他问题作斗争，有时被总结为“生产地狱”。Lucid可能也是如此，该公司将不得不在未来几个月和几个季度高速提高产量，以实现其雄心勃勃的生产目标。当然，不能确定它会遇到与其他制造商类似的问题，但由于缺乏经验，这似乎是一个值得关注的相当大的风险。最重要的是，LCID的高估值可能是一个相当大的风险——股票交易价格约为明年预期收入的30倍，而且根本不能保证这些收入会真正产生。</blockquote></p><p><b>Is Lucid Or NIO Stock The Better Buy?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid或蔚来股票更值得购买吗？</b></blockquote></p><p>Both NIO and Lucid have attractive products that seem highly competitive in the EV market that is seeing more and more entrants. I do believe that both companies will have operational success over the coming years, driven by strong tech, attractive brands, and compelling product quality. Operational growth does not necessarily result in share price growth, however, as valuations can be a major hurdle when one buys at a price that is too high.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来和Lucid都拥有有吸引力的产品，这些产品在越来越多进入者的电动汽车市场中似乎极具竞争力。我确实相信，在强大的技术、有吸引力的品牌和引人注目的产品质量的推动下，两家公司将在未来几年取得运营成功。然而，运营增长并不一定会导致股价增长，因为当以过高的价格买入时，估值可能会成为主要障碍。</blockquote></p><p>In NIO&#39;s case, that does not seem like an overly large risk, as shares are inexpensive relative to how other EV players are valued - NIO trades at ~4x next year&#39;s expected revenue, which represents a clear discount compared to LCID, RIVN, TSLA, and so on. Lucid, on the other hand, is trading at a very premium valuation of 30x next year&#39;s sales.</p><p><blockquote>就蔚来而言，这似乎并不是一个过大的风险，因为相对于其他电动汽车公司的估值而言，其股价并不昂贵——蔚来的交易价格约为明年预期收入的4倍，与LCID、RIVN、TSLA相比有明显的折扣，等等。另一方面，Lucid的估值非常高，是明年销售额的30倍。</blockquote></p><p>I do believe that, based on its larger size, more established operations, better progress in ramping production, and due to its much more reasonable valuation, NIO is the better pick among these two today.The recent share price decline makes for an attractive entry point for those interested in owning this top-notch Chinese EV player.</p><p><blockquote>我确实相信，基于其更大的规模、更成熟的业务、更好的增产进展，以及更合理的估值，蔚来是当今这两家公司中更好的选择。对于那些有兴趣拥有这家顶级中国电动汽车公司的人来说，最近的股价下跌是一个有吸引力的切入点。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477181-lucid-vs-nio-stock-better-buy\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LCID":"Lucid Group Inc","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477181-lucid-vs-nio-stock-better-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139674064","content_text":"SummaryThe EV market is getting ever more competitive. Owning strong brands or tech will be important for companies to differentiate themselves from others.Both NIO and LCID have strong brands and great tech, which allow them to demand high ASPs.NIO seems like the lower-risk choice among these two, and due to being a lot farther along from a production ramp perspective, it is, I believe, the better choice today.Trygve Finkelsen/iStock Editorial via Getty ImagesArticle ThesisThe EV space has brought up many companies that do not seem too viable in the long run, but there are also strong contenders apart from Tesla (TSLA). In this report, we'll pit Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO) against each other - two of the most interesting EV players that combine strong brands and high-end technological capabilities. In this report, we'll take a deeper dive into the tech and product side and will look at individual risks for both companies. Overall, I do believe that NIO is the more attractive choice among these two at current prices.Lucid And NIO In The EV MarketThe global EV market has been growing rapidly, with EV sales likely coming in a little north of six million, which is roughly twice as high as during the previous year. Clearly, EVs are a huge growth sector in the global automobile market, although it should be noted that most vehicles sold around the world are still powered by internal combustion engines. Over the years, EV market share should continue to climb rapidly, but it is not looking like EVs will dominate ICE vehicles any time soon.The market leaders in the EV space are Tesla and BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY), and, depending on how one counts plug-in hybrids, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY). NIO Inc. and Lucid Group, Inc. are not among the largest companies for now. NIO is selling around 11,000 vehicles a month right now, which translates into a ~130,000 annual sales pace. Sales have been growing quickly, however, which is why NIO will most likely sell more than 130,000 vehicles next year, as deliveries should continue to climb sequentially. Lucid is way smaller for now, in terms of deliveries, as the company has likely sold a couple of hundred vehicles this year. Next year, Lucid Group targets deliveries of around 20,000 vehicles - up by a lot versus 2021, but still a relatively small number compared to the deliveries NIO and many other peers will hit next year.LCID Vs. NIO's Past Quarterly PerformanceAs noted above, NIO's sales performance was way stronger than that of Lucid over the last three months, but that was hardly a surprise as LCID just began delivering vehicles to customers. On a share price basis, however, Lucid fared better:Data by YChartsOver the last three months, LCID is up close to 50%, whereas NIO saw its shares drop by close to 20% over the same time frame. In NIO's case, macro worries about Chinese regulation played a role, whereas LCID benefitted a lot from growing enthusiasm for US-based EV players caused by Rivian's (RIVN) huge IPO success. On top of that, the start of deliveries also attracted new investors to Lucid's stock. If analysts are correct, NIO is the much better value today:Data by YChartsShares are trading at less than half the consensus price target, which implies 100%+ upside over the next year, whereas LCID is trading almost perfectly in line with the current consensus price target - which implies no upside over the next year. NIO's underperformance over the last quarter thus seems to position the company well for a strong performance from the current level, whereas the same can't be said about Lucid.Lucid Vs. NIO Key MetricsLet's take a deeper look at the tech of the two companies, as well as at their branding, and their specific key risks. Both NIO and Lucid are active in the high-end segment of the EV industry, selling vehicles with ASPs well north of the average Tesla. NIO's ASP is around $70,000, and Lucid's ASP is even higher than that for now, as the company is selling the most expensive AirDreamversion first. Tesla, the current EV leader, has an ASP of around $50,000. Both NIO and Tesla are thus operating in a more luxurious, higher-end segment of the market compared to Tesla. How are these companies able to demand way higher ASPs than Tesla? There are several factors at play, including branding, but one of the most important factors is their great tech.NIO's battery-swapping technology, for example, allows its customers to fully \"recharge\" in a couple of minutes, while most other EVs take way longer to fully charge. Lucid doesn't employ battery-swapping, but its racing-tested 900V technology allows for both a huge range as well as for fast charging speeds - Lucid's architecture allows customers to charge up to 300 miles worth of energy in just 20 minutes. The Tesla S, for reference, uses a ~400V architecture that allows customers to recharge 200 miles in 15 minutes. Clearly, both NIO's solution, as well as Lucid's solution, seem superior compared to what Tesla is offering.NIO's and Lucid's tech also looks highly competitive when it comes to their respective batteries. The Lucid Air Dream has an EPA range of 520 miles, which should be sufficient for almost all use cases. NIO has a larger product portfolio compared to Lucid, but when we take a look at its top-end sedan, battery performance looks even better. The NIO ET7, with a 150kWh battery (smaller options are available, too), has a range of up to 1,000km, which equates to around 620 miles of range. Again, both NIO and Lucid perform well compared to Tesla - the flagship S Plaid has an EPA range of 350 miles. Thanks to its experience in developing and supplying racing engines for electric race cars, Lucid crafts an especially efficient engine:Source: Lucid presentationA smaller, more efficient engine results in lower resource usage and reduces the weight of the vehicle, all else equal. This does, in turn, lead to a longer range, and it also allows for better handling and driving performance, all else equal. Lucid is by far not the biggest EV player today, but its engineers have developed some of the most compelling products and solutions among all currently active EV players.NIO puts a lot of focus on technologies that will eventually allow for autonomous driving and puts massive numbers of sensors and huge computing power in its vehicles today. The ET7 uses the following sensing units for that goal:Source: NIOWith 33 sensors that use up to 8MP, NIO's sensing capabilities easily blow away those of Tesla. The Tesla Model 3, which is, according to CEO Musk, ready for full-self-driving, only uses 8 cameras with 1.2MP each. One of NIO's sensors in the ET7 thus has almost as much sensing performance as all of the cameras in the M3 combined - and NIO uses 32 additional sensors in its model. Clearly, NIO's offering is superior - and that obviously comes at a price, as NIO is not skimping when it comes to putting the best tech in its vehicles. This is also showcased by the massive processing power of the chips NIO uses in the ET7. The ET7 uses four NVIDIA (NVDA) Orin SoCs, each of which offers slightly more than 250 trillion operations per second, which makes for combined computing power of more than 1,000 TOPS - unheard of in any production vehicle. Using four SoCs at the same time also provides for the redundancy that is required for critical systems in a self-driving scenario. it should be noted that NIO's self-driving tech is not as excellent on the software side - yet. At least for now, peers such as XPeng (XPEV) seem to employ the stronger algorithms, but that is a problem that NIO can solve over the coming quarters and years, and integrating future software in its vehicles that come with top-notch hardware shouldn't be a very difficult task. Lucid's self-driving tech, even though it doesn't get a lot of recognition yet, is not looking bad at all, either. The DreamDrive suite utilizes 32 onboard sensors, almost on par with NIO's Aquila system (and 4x more sensors compared to the M3, which is allegedly L5 ready from a hardware perspective).Strong tech alone doesn't make for an attractive vehicle, however, as design, manufacturing quality, etc. have to be considered as well. Luckily, both NIO and Lucid compete very well on that basis, although the data on Lucid is still limited due to the low sales numbers - not too many people have driven a Lucid Air yet, thus data about reliability, etc. is limited. NIO, however, has been selling thousands of vehicles a month for quite some time, and its users are very satisfied with the vehicles' quality. CnTechPost reports that J.D. Power has rated NIO the highest-quality EV company in China, ahead of Tesla. Lucid is not active in the country yet, but test drives by a wide range of auto journalists and magazines have generally resulted in very positive reviews. Both NIO and Lucid thus look strong from a design, quality, and tech perspective, with NIO putting more focus on customer-friendly items such as battery-swapping and driving assistance, whereas Lucid puts more focus on engine performance, battery tech, etc. Both avenues have their advantages, but I personally could see NIO benefit more from its easy-to-use, customer-friendly approach, as not too many people will buy an EV based on criteria such as the battery architecture. Still, Lucid's ability to develop high-performing vehicles should come in very handy in the highly competitive EV industry going forward.With NIO, the main risk the market seems to worry about now is regulation/politics. I personally do not believe that regulation will be a huge risk for NIO. Chinese companies never were able to compete successfully in the ICE vehicle space, but with EV technologies bringing change to the entire global automobile industry, China saw its chance to become a global automobile powerhouse. Hurting NIO and other Chinese EV players would run contrary to those goals, which is why I believe that China is more interested in nurturing its own EV players, including NIO, instead of hurting them. Still, the market puts a discount on every Chinese company today, and that holds true for NIO as well - which might be a good thing for those seeking to buy into the company at a below-average valuation.For Lucid, regulation doesn't seem like an important risk. Instead, the main risks here are the high valuation and the production ramp. As Tesla has shown, ramping up vehicle production is no easy task. The company oftentimes had to battle with delays and other issues, sometimes summarized as \"Production Hell\". The same could hold true for Lucid, which will have to ramp up production at a high speed in the coming months and quarters in order to meet its ambitious production goals. It's not a certainty that it will experience similar issues to other manufacturers, of course, but due to a lack of experience, this seems a considerable risk worth keeping an eye on. On top of that, LCID's high valuation could be a considerable risk - shares trade at around 30x next year's expected revenue, and there is no guarantee at all that those revenues will actually be generated.Is Lucid Or NIO Stock The Better Buy?Both NIO and Lucid have attractive products that seem highly competitive in the EV market that is seeing more and more entrants. I do believe that both companies will have operational success over the coming years, driven by strong tech, attractive brands, and compelling product quality. Operational growth does not necessarily result in share price growth, however, as valuations can be a major hurdle when one buys at a price that is too high.In NIO's case, that does not seem like an overly large risk, as shares are inexpensive relative to how other EV players are valued - NIO trades at ~4x next year's expected revenue, which represents a clear discount compared to LCID, RIVN, TSLA, and so on. Lucid, on the other hand, is trading at a very premium valuation of 30x next year's sales.I do believe that, based on its larger size, more established operations, better progress in ramping production, and due to its much more reasonable valuation, NIO is the better pick among these two today.The recent share price decline makes for an attractive entry point for those interested in owning this top-notch Chinese EV player.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LCID":0.9,"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2082,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":847788561,"gmtCreate":1636554483386,"gmtModify":1636554483451,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/847788561","repostId":"1149190687","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1149190687","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636551141,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1149190687?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-10 21:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jobless claims set fresh pandemic-era low of 267,000 last week<blockquote>上周初请失业金人数创下大流行时期新低267,000人</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149190687","media":"finance.yahoo","summary":"New weekly jobless claims touched a fresh pandemic-era low yet again this week, as labor shortages a","content":"<p>New weekly jobless claims touched a fresh pandemic-era low yet again this week, as labor shortages and companies' efforts to bring on and retain workers, helping to put a cap on the pace of firings and other separations.</p><p><blockquote>由于劳动力短缺以及公司努力引进和留住工人，本周每周新申请失业救济人数再次触及大流行时期的新低，有助于限制解雇和其他离职的速度。</blockquote></p><p> The&nbsp;Labor Department released its jobless claims&nbsp;report Wednesday morning, or a day earlier than usual due to the Veterans Day holiday on Thursday. Here were the main metrics from the print, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:</p><p><blockquote>劳工部周三上午发布了初请失业金报告，由于周四是退伍军人节假期，比平时提前一天。以下是印刷品中的主要指标，与彭博社编制的共识估计进行了比较：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li><b>Initial unemployment claims, week ended November 5:</b>267,000 vs. 260,000 expected and a revised 271,000 during prior week</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>截至11月5日当周首次申请失业救济人数：</b>267,000人，前一周预期为260,000人，修正后为271,000人</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></li>  <li><b>Continuing claims, week ended October 30:</b>2.160 million vs. 2.050 million expected and a reivsed 2.101 million during prior week</p><p><blockquote><li><b>截至10月30日当周的持续索赔：</b>216万，预期205万，前一周增加210.1万</li></blockquote></p><p></li> </ul> Though claims were a touch higher than expected, they still held below the psychologically important 300,000 level for a fifth straight week and reached their lowest level since March 2020, taking out last week's pandemic-era low. New claims have been coming in at less than half their rate from this time last year, when claims were averaging more than 700,000 per week.</p><p><blockquote>尽管申请失业救济人数略高于预期，但仍连续第五周低于30万人的重要心理水平，并达到2020年3月以来的最低水平，打破了上周大流行时期的低点。新申请失业救济人数还不到去年同期的一半，当时平均每周申请失业救济人数超过70万人。</blockquote></p><p> The total number of claimants across all programs has also fallen precipitously, and reached 2.67 million for the week ended Oct. 16. This metric, which encompasses those claiming both regular state continuing claims and benefits from programs, has fallen sharply since early September, when federal pandemic-era enhanced unemployment benefits expired at the national level. Total claimants across all programs totaled well over 20 million in the comparable period last year.</p><p><blockquote>截至10月16日当周，所有项目的申请人总数也急剧下降，达到267万人。这一指标包括那些同时申请定期州持续申请和计划福利的人，自9月初联邦大流行时代增强的失业福利在全国范围内到期以来，该指标已大幅下降。去年同期，所有项目的索赔总数远远超过2000万。</blockquote></p><p> Although the labor market as a whole has yet to reach its pre-pandemic conditions, many signs have pointed to a pick-up in labor activity. Last week'sOctober jobs report showed a better-than-expected 531,000 non-farm payrollscame back last month, or the most since July. But although payrolls have grown in every month so far in 2021, the economy is still more than 4 million jobs short of pre-pandemic levels following plunges in employment between March and April 2020. And as of last month, the civilian labor force was still down by nearly 3 million individuals, compared to February 2020.</p><p><blockquote>尽管劳动力市场整体尚未达到大流行前的状况，但许多迹象表明劳动力活动有所回升。上周的10月份就业报告显示，上个月非农就业人数为531,000人，好于预期，为7月份以来的最高水平。但是，尽管2021年迄今为止每个月的就业人数都在增长，但在2020年3月至4月就业人数大幅下降后，经济仍比大流行前的水平少400多万个就业岗位。截至上个月，与2020年2月相比，平民劳动力仍减少了近300万人。</blockquote></p><p> Labor supply challenges have been especially onerous. In the past several weeks alone, an array of companies — fromHyatt (H)toYum! Brands (YUM)and&nbsp;Whirlpool (WHR), among many others — have cited difficulties in hiring enough workers to meet consumer demand. And by Bank of America's count, mentions about \"labor\" on corporate third-quarter earnings calls have risen by 250% so far from the same period last year.</p><p><blockquote>劳动力供应挑战尤其严峻。仅在过去几周，一系列公司——从凯悦（H）toYum！百胜餐饮集团（YUM）和惠而浦（Whirlpool）等许多公司都表示难以雇用足够的工人来满足消费者需求。据美银统计，迄今为止，评级企业第三季度财报中提及“劳工”的内容较去年同期增加了250%。</blockquote></p><p> \"Candidly, demand came back faster than this industry expected. And we've had a challenge bringing people back into the workforce,\" Keith Barr, IHG Hotels and Resorts CEO, told Yahoo Finance on Tuesday. \"We estimate that we're down between 25% to 30% in this industry. But we did see positive trends in October with the jobs report here in the U.S. And a significant portion of those jobs are in hospitality.\"</p><p><blockquote>洲际酒店集团酒店及度假村首席执行官基思·巴尔(Keith Barr)周二对雅虎财经表示：“坦率地说，需求恢复速度快于行业预期。我们在让人们重返劳动力市场方面面临着挑战。”“我们估计这个行业的失业率下降了25%至30%。但我们确实在10月份看到了美国就业报告的积极趋势，其中很大一部分工作岗位是在酒店业。”</blockquote></p><p> Still, some companies have managed to navigate the supply shortages more effectively than others.Lyft (LYFT), for instance, noted that it saw a 45% increase in active drivers in its most recent quarter, and CVS Health (CVS) CEO Karen Lynch said on the company's earnings call it hired \"a record number of workers in the third quarter to advance open enrollment and customer service\" and in its technology and clinical capabilities roles. Sam's Club CEO Kathryn McClayrecently told Yahoo Finance the company&nbsp;was \"at full employment in the field.\"</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些公司还是比其他公司更有效地应对了供应短缺问题。例如，Lyft（Lyft）指出，其最近一个季度的活跃司机数量增加了45%，CVS Health(CVS)首席执行官凯伦·林奇(Karen Lynch)在该公司的收益看涨期权上表示，该公司在第三季度雇用了“创纪录数量的员工，以推进开放注册和客户服务”以及技术和临床能力职位。山姆会员店首席执行官凯瑟琳·麦克莱最近告诉雅虎财经，该公司“在该领域已充分就业”。</blockquote></p><p> Many of the companies that have managed to keep up with hiring have been those that have raised wages or otherwise offered additional benefits to employees, many economists noted.</p><p><blockquote>许多经济学家指出，许多成功跟上招聘步伐的公司都是那些提高工资或以其他方式向员工提供额外福利的公司。</blockquote></p><p> \"There is a price for labor where supply and demand will clear,\" wrote Rubeela Farooqi, chief economist for High Frequency Economics, in a note. \"To appeal to workers, businesses have to either offer competitive wages, reduce the scope of their operations, or fail. In today's economy, these dislocations have yet to be resolved.\"</p><p><blockquote>高频经济学首席经济学家鲁比拉·法鲁奇（Rubeela Farooqi）在一份报告中写道：“劳动力有一个供需明确的价格。”“为了吸引工人，企业要么提供有竞争力的工资，要么缩小经营范围，要么倒闭。在当今的经济中，这些错位尚未得到解决。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jobless claims set fresh pandemic-era low of 267,000 last week<blockquote>上周初请失业金人数创下大流行时期新低267,000人</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJobless claims set fresh pandemic-era low of 267,000 last week<blockquote>上周初请失业金人数创下大流行时期新低267,000人</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">finance.yahoo</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-10 21:32</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>New weekly jobless claims touched a fresh pandemic-era low yet again this week, as labor shortages and companies' efforts to bring on and retain workers, helping to put a cap on the pace of firings and other separations.</p><p><blockquote>由于劳动力短缺以及公司努力引进和留住工人，本周每周新申请失业救济人数再次触及大流行时期的新低，有助于限制解雇和其他离职的速度。</blockquote></p><p> The&nbsp;Labor Department released its jobless claims&nbsp;report Wednesday morning, or a day earlier than usual due to the Veterans Day holiday on Thursday. Here were the main metrics from the print, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:</p><p><blockquote>劳工部周三上午发布了初请失业金报告，由于周四是退伍军人节假期，比平时提前一天。以下是印刷品中的主要指标，与彭博社编制的共识估计进行了比较：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li><b>Initial unemployment claims, week ended November 5:</b>267,000 vs. 260,000 expected and a revised 271,000 during prior week</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>截至11月5日当周首次申请失业救济人数：</b>267,000人，前一周预期为260,000人，修正后为271,000人</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></li>  <li><b>Continuing claims, week ended October 30:</b>2.160 million vs. 2.050 million expected and a reivsed 2.101 million during prior week</p><p><blockquote><li><b>截至10月30日当周的持续索赔：</b>216万，预期205万，前一周增加210.1万</li></blockquote></p><p></li> </ul> Though claims were a touch higher than expected, they still held below the psychologically important 300,000 level for a fifth straight week and reached their lowest level since March 2020, taking out last week's pandemic-era low. New claims have been coming in at less than half their rate from this time last year, when claims were averaging more than 700,000 per week.</p><p><blockquote>尽管申请失业救济人数略高于预期，但仍连续第五周低于30万人的重要心理水平，并达到2020年3月以来的最低水平，打破了上周大流行时期的低点。新申请失业救济人数还不到去年同期的一半，当时平均每周申请失业救济人数超过70万人。</blockquote></p><p> The total number of claimants across all programs has also fallen precipitously, and reached 2.67 million for the week ended Oct. 16. This metric, which encompasses those claiming both regular state continuing claims and benefits from programs, has fallen sharply since early September, when federal pandemic-era enhanced unemployment benefits expired at the national level. Total claimants across all programs totaled well over 20 million in the comparable period last year.</p><p><blockquote>截至10月16日当周，所有项目的申请人总数也急剧下降，达到267万人。这一指标包括那些同时申请定期州持续申请和计划福利的人，自9月初联邦大流行时代增强的失业福利在全国范围内到期以来，该指标已大幅下降。去年同期，所有项目的索赔总数远远超过2000万。</blockquote></p><p> Although the labor market as a whole has yet to reach its pre-pandemic conditions, many signs have pointed to a pick-up in labor activity. Last week'sOctober jobs report showed a better-than-expected 531,000 non-farm payrollscame back last month, or the most since July. But although payrolls have grown in every month so far in 2021, the economy is still more than 4 million jobs short of pre-pandemic levels following plunges in employment between March and April 2020. And as of last month, the civilian labor force was still down by nearly 3 million individuals, compared to February 2020.</p><p><blockquote>尽管劳动力市场整体尚未达到大流行前的状况，但许多迹象表明劳动力活动有所回升。上周的10月份就业报告显示，上个月非农就业人数为531,000人，好于预期，为7月份以来的最高水平。但是，尽管2021年迄今为止每个月的就业人数都在增长，但在2020年3月至4月就业人数大幅下降后，经济仍比大流行前的水平少400多万个就业岗位。截至上个月，与2020年2月相比，平民劳动力仍减少了近300万人。</blockquote></p><p> Labor supply challenges have been especially onerous. In the past several weeks alone, an array of companies — fromHyatt (H)toYum! Brands (YUM)and&nbsp;Whirlpool (WHR), among many others — have cited difficulties in hiring enough workers to meet consumer demand. And by Bank of America's count, mentions about \"labor\" on corporate third-quarter earnings calls have risen by 250% so far from the same period last year.</p><p><blockquote>劳动力供应挑战尤其严峻。仅在过去几周，一系列公司——从凯悦（H）toYum！百胜餐饮集团（YUM）和惠而浦（Whirlpool）等许多公司都表示难以雇用足够的工人来满足消费者需求。据美银统计，迄今为止，评级企业第三季度财报中提及“劳工”的内容较去年同期增加了250%。</blockquote></p><p> \"Candidly, demand came back faster than this industry expected. And we've had a challenge bringing people back into the workforce,\" Keith Barr, IHG Hotels and Resorts CEO, told Yahoo Finance on Tuesday. \"We estimate that we're down between 25% to 30% in this industry. But we did see positive trends in October with the jobs report here in the U.S. And a significant portion of those jobs are in hospitality.\"</p><p><blockquote>洲际酒店集团酒店及度假村首席执行官基思·巴尔(Keith Barr)周二对雅虎财经表示：“坦率地说，需求恢复速度快于行业预期。我们在让人们重返劳动力市场方面面临着挑战。”“我们估计这个行业的失业率下降了25%至30%。但我们确实在10月份看到了美国就业报告的积极趋势，其中很大一部分工作岗位是在酒店业。”</blockquote></p><p> Still, some companies have managed to navigate the supply shortages more effectively than others.Lyft (LYFT), for instance, noted that it saw a 45% increase in active drivers in its most recent quarter, and CVS Health (CVS) CEO Karen Lynch said on the company's earnings call it hired \"a record number of workers in the third quarter to advance open enrollment and customer service\" and in its technology and clinical capabilities roles. Sam's Club CEO Kathryn McClayrecently told Yahoo Finance the company&nbsp;was \"at full employment in the field.\"</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些公司还是比其他公司更有效地应对了供应短缺问题。例如，Lyft（Lyft）指出，其最近一个季度的活跃司机数量增加了45%，CVS Health(CVS)首席执行官凯伦·林奇(Karen Lynch)在该公司的收益看涨期权上表示，该公司在第三季度雇用了“创纪录数量的员工，以推进开放注册和客户服务”以及技术和临床能力职位。山姆会员店首席执行官凯瑟琳·麦克莱最近告诉雅虎财经，该公司“在该领域已充分就业”。</blockquote></p><p> Many of the companies that have managed to keep up with hiring have been those that have raised wages or otherwise offered additional benefits to employees, many economists noted.</p><p><blockquote>许多经济学家指出，许多成功跟上招聘步伐的公司都是那些提高工资或以其他方式向员工提供额外福利的公司。</blockquote></p><p> \"There is a price for labor where supply and demand will clear,\" wrote Rubeela Farooqi, chief economist for High Frequency Economics, in a note. \"To appeal to workers, businesses have to either offer competitive wages, reduce the scope of their operations, or fail. In today's economy, these dislocations have yet to be resolved.\"</p><p><blockquote>高频经济学首席经济学家鲁比拉·法鲁奇（Rubeela Farooqi）在一份报告中写道：“劳动力有一个供需明确的价格。”“为了吸引工人，企业要么提供有竞争力的工资，要么缩小经营范围，要么倒闭。在当今的经济中，这些错位尚未得到解决。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/weekly-jobless-claims-week-ended-november-5-2021-190316751.html\">finance.yahoo</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/weekly-jobless-claims-week-ended-november-5-2021-190316751.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149190687","content_text":"New weekly jobless claims touched a fresh pandemic-era low yet again this week, as labor shortages and companies' efforts to bring on and retain workers, helping to put a cap on the pace of firings and other separations.\nThe Labor Department released its jobless claims report Wednesday morning, or a day earlier than usual due to the Veterans Day holiday on Thursday. Here were the main metrics from the print, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:\n\nInitial unemployment claims, week ended November 5:267,000 vs. 260,000 expected and a revised 271,000 during prior week\nContinuing claims, week ended October 30:2.160 million vs. 2.050 million expected and a reivsed 2.101 million during prior week\n\nThough claims were a touch higher than expected, they still held below the psychologically important 300,000 level for a fifth straight week and reached their lowest level since March 2020, taking out last week's pandemic-era low. New claims have been coming in at less than half their rate from this time last year, when claims were averaging more than 700,000 per week.\nThe total number of claimants across all programs has also fallen precipitously, and reached 2.67 million for the week ended Oct. 16. This metric, which encompasses those claiming both regular state continuing claims and benefits from programs, has fallen sharply since early September, when federal pandemic-era enhanced unemployment benefits expired at the national level. Total claimants across all programs totaled well over 20 million in the comparable period last year.\nAlthough the labor market as a whole has yet to reach its pre-pandemic conditions, many signs have pointed to a pick-up in labor activity. Last week'sOctober jobs report showed a better-than-expected 531,000 non-farm payrollscame back last month, or the most since July. But although payrolls have grown in every month so far in 2021, the economy is still more than 4 million jobs short of pre-pandemic levels following plunges in employment between March and April 2020. And as of last month, the civilian labor force was still down by nearly 3 million individuals, compared to February 2020.\nLabor supply challenges have been especially onerous. In the past several weeks alone, an array of companies — fromHyatt (H)toYum! Brands (YUM)and Whirlpool (WHR), among many others — have cited difficulties in hiring enough workers to meet consumer demand. And by Bank of America's count, mentions about \"labor\" on corporate third-quarter earnings calls have risen by 250% so far from the same period last year.\n\"Candidly, demand came back faster than this industry expected. And we've had a challenge bringing people back into the workforce,\" Keith Barr, IHG Hotels and Resorts CEO, told Yahoo Finance on Tuesday. \"We estimate that we're down between 25% to 30% in this industry. But we did see positive trends in October with the jobs report here in the U.S. And a significant portion of those jobs are in hospitality.\"\nStill, some companies have managed to navigate the supply shortages more effectively than others.Lyft (LYFT), for instance, noted that it saw a 45% increase in active drivers in its most recent quarter, and CVS Health (CVS) CEO Karen Lynch said on the company's earnings call it hired \"a record number of workers in the third quarter to advance open enrollment and customer service\" and in its technology and clinical capabilities roles. Sam's Club CEO Kathryn McClayrecently told Yahoo Finance the company was \"at full employment in the field.\"\nMany of the companies that have managed to keep up with hiring have been those that have raised wages or otherwise offered additional benefits to employees, many economists noted.\n\"There is a price for labor where supply and demand will clear,\" wrote Rubeela Farooqi, chief economist for High Frequency Economics, in a note. \"To appeal to workers, businesses have to either offer competitive wages, reduce the scope of their operations, or fail. In today's economy, these dislocations have yet to be resolved.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":423,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":847644391,"gmtCreate":1636517873221,"gmtModify":1636517873326,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good sharing&nbsp;","listText":"Good sharing&nbsp;","text":"Good sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/847644391","repostId":"1122480121","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1122480121","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636515867,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1122480121?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-10 11:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These 25 semiconductor stocks could rise as much as 43% with chips in short supply<blockquote>芯片供不应求这25只半导体股或涨43%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122480121","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"Just about every investor is aware that a shortage of semiconductors and related equipment, includin","content":"<p>Just about every investor is aware that a shortage of semiconductors and related equipment, including microprocessors and chips, are in short supply while demand is high. And yet the stocks of this critical group trade relatively low to the broader stock market.</p><p><blockquote>几乎每个投资者都意识到，半导体和相关设备（包括微处理器和芯片）供应短缺，而需求却很高。然而，这一关键群体的股票交易价格相对于大盘而言相对较低。</blockquote></p><p> Below is a list of favorite semiconductor stocks among Wall Street analysts, based on a deep dive into the holdings of five exchange traded funds focused on the industry.</p><p><blockquote>以下是华尔街分析师最喜欢的半导体股票列表，该列表基于对专注于该行业的五只交易所交易基金持有量的深入研究。</blockquote></p><p> The chip shortage isn’t the whole story — innovation and new business have lit fires under some of the best-known semiconductor companies. Shares of Nvidia Corp.NVDAwere up 49% from the end of September through Nov. 8, while Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMDwas up 46%.</p><p><blockquote>芯片短缺并不是故事的全部——创新和新业务已经点燃了一些最知名的半导体公司的火焰。从9月底到11月8日，Nvidia Corp.NVDA的股价上涨了49%，而Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMD的股价上涨了46%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Industry appears cheaply valued</b></p><p><blockquote><b>行业估值似乎很低</b></blockquote></p><p> The PHLX Semiconductor IndexSOXis considered the benchmark index for chip makers and companies that make equipment and systems used by them. It is tracked by the iShares Semiconductor ETFSOXX,which holds all 30 stocks in the index and is weighted by market capitalization.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX半导体指数Soxis被认为是芯片制造商以及制造其使用的设备和系统的公司的基准指数。它由iShares Semiconductor ETFSOXX跟踪，该ETFSOXX持有该指数中的所有30只股票，并按市值加权。</blockquote></p><p> This means Nvidia is the top holding, making up 9.7% of the portfolio, and the top five investments, which also include Broadcom Inc.AVGO,Intel Corp.INTC,Qualcomm Inc.QCOMand Texas Instruments Inc.TXN,account for 35.3% of the ETF’s assets. The sixth-ranked company, AMD, is 4.5% of the portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着英伟达是最大持股，占投资组合的9.7%，而前五名投资（还包括博通公司AVGO、英特尔公司INTC、高通公司QCOM和德州仪器公司TXN）占35.3%ETF的资产。排名第六的公司AMD占投资组合的4.5%。</blockquote></p><p> SOXX trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 20.9, based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet, while the forward P/E for the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPXis 21.7. It’s not unusual for the semiconductors to trade at a discount. However, it<i>is</i>unusual for there to be a broad shortage of the industry’s products.</p><p><blockquote>根据FactSet调查的分析师一致预期，SOXX的预期市盈率为20.9，而标普500指数SPXI的预期市盈率为21.7。半导体折价交易并不罕见。然而，它<i>是</i>该行业的产品普遍短缺是不寻常的。</blockquote></p><p> Here’s how SOXX has traded relative to the S&amp;P 500 over the past 10 years:</p><p><blockquote>以下是SOXX过去10年相对于标普500的交易情况：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/565a527c93f3b84b9b58a527627e6aa6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">FACTSET</p><p><blockquote>FACTSET</blockquote></p><p> Underlining the discount for the semiconductor group is the expectation that the group will increase its sales and earnings much more quickly over the next two years.</p><p><blockquote>强调该半导体集团折扣的是，预计该集团将在未来两年内更快地增加销售额和盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Here are expected compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for sales and earnings per share through 2023, based on weighted consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet:</p><p><blockquote>以下是根据FactSet调查的分析师的加权共识估计，到2023年销售额和每股收益的预期复合年增长率(CAGR)：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ebde8ab9420b13a890ecac197154fb9\" tg-width=\"935\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">ETF deep dive</p><p><blockquote>ETF深潜</blockquote></p><p> To look beyond the SOXX 30, we reviewed five ETFs that follow different approaches, to come up with a broader initial list of stocks:</p><p><blockquote>为了超越SOXX 30，我们回顾了遵循不同方法的五只ETF，以得出更广泛的初始股票列表：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>SOXX is the largest, with $8.9 billion in total assets, and is cap-weighted, as described above. It holds the 30 largest U.S.-listed companies in the industry, including American depositary receipts (ADRs) of foreign companies, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.TSM,which are capped at 10% of the portfolio. Its annual expenses are 0.43% of assets under management.</li>  <li>The VanEck Semiconductor ETFSMHhas $6.9 billion in assets, with a cap-weighted portfolio of 25 stocks, selected though a scoring methodology that includes market cap and trading volume. It is even more concentrated than SOXX, with its top five holdings making up 44.4% of the portfolio, but its different weighting scheme means Taiwan Semiconductor is the top holding, at 14.5%. Its expense ratio is 0.35%.</li>  <li>The SPDR S&amp;P Semiconductor ETFXSDhas $1.4 billion in assets, with a modified equal weighting of 40 stocks that “tilts its portfolio away from large, well-known companies and toward smaller growth ones,” according to FactSet. Its expense ratio is 0.35%.</li>  <li>The Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETFPSIalso leans toward smaller companies, with a modified equal-weighted $860 million portfolio of 30 stocks, reconstituted quarterly. Its expense ratio is 0.56%.</li>  <li>The First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETFFTXLhas $95 million in assets and holds 30 of the most liquid semiconductor stocks listed in the U.S., “weighted according to factors related to value, volatility and growth,” according to FactSet. Its largest holding is Synaptics Inc.SYNA,which makes up 8.3% of the portfolio. Its expense ratio is 0.60%.</li> </ul> Together, removing duplicates, the five ETFs hold 65 stocks, with 62 covered by at least five analysts covered by FactSet.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>如上所述，SOXX是最大的，总资产为89亿美元，并且按市值加权。它持有业内30家最大的美国上市公司，包括台积电公司（TSM）等外国公司的美国存托凭证（ADR），其上限为投资组合的10%。其年度费用为管理资产的0.43%。</li><li>VanEck Semiconductor ETFSMH拥有69亿美元的资产，市值加权投资组合由25只股票组成，通过包括市值和交易量的评分方法进行选择。它甚至比SOXX更加集中，其前五名持股占投资组合的44.4%，但其不同的权重方案意味着台积电是最大持股，为14.5%。其费用率为0.35%。</li><li>FactSet的数据显示，SPDR S&amp;P Semiconductor ETFXSDH拥有14亿美元的资产，修改后的等权重为40只股票，“使其投资组合远离大型知名公司，转向规模较小的成长型公司”。其费用率为0.35%。</li><li>Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETFPSI也倾向于规模较小的公司，其修改后的等权重为8.6亿美元的投资组合由30只股票组成，每季度重组一次。其费用率为0.56%。</li><li>FactSet的数据显示，第一信托纳斯达克半导体ETFFTXL拥有9500万美元的资产，持有30只在美国上市的流动性最强的半导体股票，“根据与价值、波动性和增长相关的因素进行加权”。其最大持股是Synaptics Inc.SYNA，占投资组合的8.3%。其费用率为0.60%。</li></ul>剔除重复项后，这五只ETF总共持有65只股票，其中62只股票由FactSet覆盖的至少5名分析师覆盖。</blockquote></p><p> Among the 62 companies, 25 have “buy” or equivalent ratings among at least 75% of the analysts. Only 10 of them are held by SOXX and only three (including Nvidia) are held by all five ETFs. Here they are, ranked by the implied 12-month upside, based on consensus price targets:</p><p><blockquote>在这62家公司中，有25家公司获得了至少75%的分析师的“买入”或同等评级。其中只有10只由SOXX持有，所有5只ETF仅持有3只（包括Nvidia）。以下是根据共识价格目标按隐含的12个月上涨空间进行排名：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c56961b72468eebe8eb44b9710295512\" tg-width=\"879\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As you can see on the table, some of the stocks, despite being so well-regarded, have gotten ahead of their one-year price targets. Nvidia is a good example. Why do so many analysts rate it a buy, despite believing the stock is overheated? Because they are looking at years beyond a 12-month target.</p><p><blockquote>正如您在表格中看到的，一些股票尽管受到好评，但已经超出了一年的价格目标。英伟达就是一个很好的例子。为什么这么多分析师认为该股过热，但仍将其评级为买入？因为他们着眼于12个月目标之外的几年。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These 25 semiconductor stocks could rise as much as 43% with chips in short supply<blockquote>芯片供不应求这25只半导体股或涨43%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese 25 semiconductor stocks could rise as much as 43% with chips in short supply<blockquote>芯片供不应求这25只半导体股或涨43%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-10 11:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Just about every investor is aware that a shortage of semiconductors and related equipment, including microprocessors and chips, are in short supply while demand is high. And yet the stocks of this critical group trade relatively low to the broader stock market.</p><p><blockquote>几乎每个投资者都意识到，半导体和相关设备（包括微处理器和芯片）供应短缺，而需求却很高。然而，这一关键群体的股票交易价格相对于大盘而言相对较低。</blockquote></p><p> Below is a list of favorite semiconductor stocks among Wall Street analysts, based on a deep dive into the holdings of five exchange traded funds focused on the industry.</p><p><blockquote>以下是华尔街分析师最喜欢的半导体股票列表，该列表基于对专注于该行业的五只交易所交易基金持有量的深入研究。</blockquote></p><p> The chip shortage isn’t the whole story — innovation and new business have lit fires under some of the best-known semiconductor companies. Shares of Nvidia Corp.NVDAwere up 49% from the end of September through Nov. 8, while Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMDwas up 46%.</p><p><blockquote>芯片短缺并不是故事的全部——创新和新业务已经点燃了一些最知名的半导体公司的火焰。从9月底到11月8日，Nvidia Corp.NVDA的股价上涨了49%，而Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMD的股价上涨了46%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Industry appears cheaply valued</b></p><p><blockquote><b>行业估值似乎很低</b></blockquote></p><p> The PHLX Semiconductor IndexSOXis considered the benchmark index for chip makers and companies that make equipment and systems used by them. It is tracked by the iShares Semiconductor ETFSOXX,which holds all 30 stocks in the index and is weighted by market capitalization.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX半导体指数Soxis被认为是芯片制造商以及制造其使用的设备和系统的公司的基准指数。它由iShares Semiconductor ETFSOXX跟踪，该ETFSOXX持有该指数中的所有30只股票，并按市值加权。</blockquote></p><p> This means Nvidia is the top holding, making up 9.7% of the portfolio, and the top five investments, which also include Broadcom Inc.AVGO,Intel Corp.INTC,Qualcomm Inc.QCOMand Texas Instruments Inc.TXN,account for 35.3% of the ETF’s assets. The sixth-ranked company, AMD, is 4.5% of the portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着英伟达是最大持股，占投资组合的9.7%，而前五名投资（还包括博通公司AVGO、英特尔公司INTC、高通公司QCOM和德州仪器公司TXN）占35.3%ETF的资产。排名第六的公司AMD占投资组合的4.5%。</blockquote></p><p> SOXX trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 20.9, based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet, while the forward P/E for the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPXis 21.7. It’s not unusual for the semiconductors to trade at a discount. However, it<i>is</i>unusual for there to be a broad shortage of the industry’s products.</p><p><blockquote>根据FactSet调查的分析师一致预期，SOXX的预期市盈率为20.9，而标普500指数SPXI的预期市盈率为21.7。半导体折价交易并不罕见。然而，它<i>是</i>该行业的产品普遍短缺是不寻常的。</blockquote></p><p> Here’s how SOXX has traded relative to the S&amp;P 500 over the past 10 years:</p><p><blockquote>以下是SOXX过去10年相对于标普500的交易情况：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/565a527c93f3b84b9b58a527627e6aa6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">FACTSET</p><p><blockquote>FACTSET</blockquote></p><p> Underlining the discount for the semiconductor group is the expectation that the group will increase its sales and earnings much more quickly over the next two years.</p><p><blockquote>强调该半导体集团折扣的是，预计该集团将在未来两年内更快地增加销售额和盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Here are expected compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for sales and earnings per share through 2023, based on weighted consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet:</p><p><blockquote>以下是根据FactSet调查的分析师的加权共识估计，到2023年销售额和每股收益的预期复合年增长率(CAGR)：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ebde8ab9420b13a890ecac197154fb9\" tg-width=\"935\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">ETF deep dive</p><p><blockquote>ETF深潜</blockquote></p><p> To look beyond the SOXX 30, we reviewed five ETFs that follow different approaches, to come up with a broader initial list of stocks:</p><p><blockquote>为了超越SOXX 30，我们回顾了遵循不同方法的五只ETF，以得出更广泛的初始股票列表：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>SOXX is the largest, with $8.9 billion in total assets, and is cap-weighted, as described above. It holds the 30 largest U.S.-listed companies in the industry, including American depositary receipts (ADRs) of foreign companies, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.TSM,which are capped at 10% of the portfolio. Its annual expenses are 0.43% of assets under management.</li>  <li>The VanEck Semiconductor ETFSMHhas $6.9 billion in assets, with a cap-weighted portfolio of 25 stocks, selected though a scoring methodology that includes market cap and trading volume. It is even more concentrated than SOXX, with its top five holdings making up 44.4% of the portfolio, but its different weighting scheme means Taiwan Semiconductor is the top holding, at 14.5%. Its expense ratio is 0.35%.</li>  <li>The SPDR S&amp;P Semiconductor ETFXSDhas $1.4 billion in assets, with a modified equal weighting of 40 stocks that “tilts its portfolio away from large, well-known companies and toward smaller growth ones,” according to FactSet. Its expense ratio is 0.35%.</li>  <li>The Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETFPSIalso leans toward smaller companies, with a modified equal-weighted $860 million portfolio of 30 stocks, reconstituted quarterly. Its expense ratio is 0.56%.</li>  <li>The First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETFFTXLhas $95 million in assets and holds 30 of the most liquid semiconductor stocks listed in the U.S., “weighted according to factors related to value, volatility and growth,” according to FactSet. Its largest holding is Synaptics Inc.SYNA,which makes up 8.3% of the portfolio. Its expense ratio is 0.60%.</li> </ul> Together, removing duplicates, the five ETFs hold 65 stocks, with 62 covered by at least five analysts covered by FactSet.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>如上所述，SOXX是最大的，总资产为89亿美元，并且按市值加权。它持有业内30家最大的美国上市公司，包括台积电公司（TSM）等外国公司的美国存托凭证（ADR），其上限为投资组合的10%。其年度费用为管理资产的0.43%。</li><li>VanEck Semiconductor ETFSMH拥有69亿美元的资产，市值加权投资组合由25只股票组成，通过包括市值和交易量的评分方法进行选择。它甚至比SOXX更加集中，其前五名持股占投资组合的44.4%，但其不同的权重方案意味着台积电是最大持股，为14.5%。其费用率为0.35%。</li><li>FactSet的数据显示，SPDR S&amp;P Semiconductor ETFXSDH拥有14亿美元的资产，修改后的等权重为40只股票，“使其投资组合远离大型知名公司，转向规模较小的成长型公司”。其费用率为0.35%。</li><li>Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETFPSI也倾向于规模较小的公司，其修改后的等权重为8.6亿美元的投资组合由30只股票组成，每季度重组一次。其费用率为0.56%。</li><li>FactSet的数据显示，第一信托纳斯达克半导体ETFFTXL拥有9500万美元的资产，持有30只在美国上市的流动性最强的半导体股票，“根据与价值、波动性和增长相关的因素进行加权”。其最大持股是Synaptics Inc.SYNA，占投资组合的8.3%。其费用率为0.60%。</li></ul>剔除重复项后，这五只ETF总共持有65只股票，其中62只股票由FactSet覆盖的至少5名分析师覆盖。</blockquote></p><p> Among the 62 companies, 25 have “buy” or equivalent ratings among at least 75% of the analysts. Only 10 of them are held by SOXX and only three (including Nvidia) are held by all five ETFs. Here they are, ranked by the implied 12-month upside, based on consensus price targets:</p><p><blockquote>在这62家公司中，有25家公司获得了至少75%的分析师的“买入”或同等评级。其中只有10只由SOXX持有，所有5只ETF仅持有3只（包括Nvidia）。以下是根据共识价格目标按隐含的12个月上涨空间进行排名：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c56961b72468eebe8eb44b9710295512\" tg-width=\"879\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As you can see on the table, some of the stocks, despite being so well-regarded, have gotten ahead of their one-year price targets. Nvidia is a good example. Why do so many analysts rate it a buy, despite believing the stock is overheated? Because they are looking at years beyond a 12-month target.</p><p><blockquote>正如您在表格中看到的，一些股票尽管受到好评，但已经超出了一年的价格目标。英伟达就是一个很好的例子。为什么这么多分析师认为该股过热，但仍将其评级为买入？因为他们着眼于12个月目标之外的几年。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-25-semiconductor-stocks-could-rise-as-much-as-43-with-chips-in-short-supply-11636476231?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-25-semiconductor-stocks-could-rise-as-much-as-43-with-chips-in-short-supply-11636476231?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1122480121","content_text":"Just about every investor is aware that a shortage of semiconductors and related equipment, including microprocessors and chips, are in short supply while demand is high. And yet the stocks of this critical group trade relatively low to the broader stock market.\nBelow is a list of favorite semiconductor stocks among Wall Street analysts, based on a deep dive into the holdings of five exchange traded funds focused on the industry.\nThe chip shortage isn’t the whole story — innovation and new business have lit fires under some of the best-known semiconductor companies. Shares of Nvidia Corp.NVDAwere up 49% from the end of September through Nov. 8, while Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMDwas up 46%.\nIndustry appears cheaply valued\nThe PHLX Semiconductor IndexSOXis considered the benchmark index for chip makers and companies that make equipment and systems used by them. It is tracked by the iShares Semiconductor ETFSOXX,which holds all 30 stocks in the index and is weighted by market capitalization.\nThis means Nvidia is the top holding, making up 9.7% of the portfolio, and the top five investments, which also include Broadcom Inc.AVGO,Intel Corp.INTC,Qualcomm Inc.QCOMand Texas Instruments Inc.TXN,account for 35.3% of the ETF’s assets. The sixth-ranked company, AMD, is 4.5% of the portfolio.\nSOXX trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 20.9, based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet, while the forward P/E for the S&P 500 IndexSPXis 21.7. It’s not unusual for the semiconductors to trade at a discount. However, itisunusual for there to be a broad shortage of the industry’s products.\nHere’s how SOXX has traded relative to the S&P 500 over the past 10 years:\nFACTSET\nUnderlining the discount for the semiconductor group is the expectation that the group will increase its sales and earnings much more quickly over the next two years.\nHere are expected compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for sales and earnings per share through 2023, based on weighted consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet:\nETF deep dive\nTo look beyond the SOXX 30, we reviewed five ETFs that follow different approaches, to come up with a broader initial list of stocks:\n\nSOXX is the largest, with $8.9 billion in total assets, and is cap-weighted, as described above. It holds the 30 largest U.S.-listed companies in the industry, including American depositary receipts (ADRs) of foreign companies, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.TSM,which are capped at 10% of the portfolio. Its annual expenses are 0.43% of assets under management.\nThe VanEck Semiconductor ETFSMHhas $6.9 billion in assets, with a cap-weighted portfolio of 25 stocks, selected though a scoring methodology that includes market cap and trading volume. It is even more concentrated than SOXX, with its top five holdings making up 44.4% of the portfolio, but its different weighting scheme means Taiwan Semiconductor is the top holding, at 14.5%. Its expense ratio is 0.35%.\nThe SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFXSDhas $1.4 billion in assets, with a modified equal weighting of 40 stocks that “tilts its portfolio away from large, well-known companies and toward smaller growth ones,” according to FactSet. Its expense ratio is 0.35%.\nThe Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETFPSIalso leans toward smaller companies, with a modified equal-weighted $860 million portfolio of 30 stocks, reconstituted quarterly. Its expense ratio is 0.56%.\nThe First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETFFTXLhas $95 million in assets and holds 30 of the most liquid semiconductor stocks listed in the U.S., “weighted according to factors related to value, volatility and growth,” according to FactSet. Its largest holding is Synaptics Inc.SYNA,which makes up 8.3% of the portfolio. Its expense ratio is 0.60%.\n\nTogether, removing duplicates, the five ETFs hold 65 stocks, with 62 covered by at least five analysts covered by FactSet.\nAmong the 62 companies, 25 have “buy” or equivalent ratings among at least 75% of the analysts. Only 10 of them are held by SOXX and only three (including Nvidia) are held by all five ETFs. Here they are, ranked by the implied 12-month upside, based on consensus price targets:\nAs you can see on the table, some of the stocks, despite being so well-regarded, have gotten ahead of their one-year price targets. Nvidia is a good example. Why do so many analysts rate it a buy, despite believing the stock is overheated? Because they are looking at years beyond a 12-month target.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9,"NVDA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":391,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692235506,"gmtCreate":1640974517792,"gmtModify":1640974517916,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692235506","repostId":"1139922858","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139922858","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640963323,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1139922858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-31 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139922858","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/52a8a5b51cea78b126f429bba375c881\" tg-width=\"360\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>电动汽车股早盘上涨。Lucid、蔚来、Rivian、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、菲斯克、尼古拉、Canoo和图森未来股价上涨1%至3%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-31 23:08</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/52a8a5b51cea78b126f429bba375c881\" tg-width=\"360\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>电动汽车股早盘上涨。Lucid、蔚来、Rivian、小鹏汽车、理想汽车、菲斯克、尼古拉、Canoo和图森未来股价上涨1%至3%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139922858","content_text":"EV stocks climbed in morning trading. Lucid, Nio, Rivian, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Fisker, Nikola, Canoo, and Tusimple climbed between 1% and 3%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LI":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2433,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692235890,"gmtCreate":1640974484116,"gmtModify":1640974484209,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks for sharing&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks for sharing&nbsp;","text":"Thanks for sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692235890","repostId":"2195412163","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2843,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690028597,"gmtCreate":1639615095034,"gmtModify":1639619914291,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Actually this type of business company, i buy for future&nbsp;","listText":"Actually this type of business company, i buy for future&nbsp;","text":"Actually this type of business company, i buy for future","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690028597","repostId":"1143795954","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":491,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604221022,"gmtCreate":1639405471805,"gmtModify":1639405471904,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good sharing","listText":"Good sharing","text":"Good sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604221022","repostId":"1103876293","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1103876293","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639365728,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103876293?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 11:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Supercharged Electric-Vehicle Stocks to Buy in 2022 and Beyond<blockquote>2022年及以后值得买入的3只增压电动汽车股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103876293","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These three companies involve different risks, but each could supercharge your portfolio over the long term.","content":"<p>An investor who wants to dive into the electric-vehicle (EV) sector should be comfortable with a variety of risks. But those risks balance with potential rewards. That's what investing is all about, after all.</p><p><blockquote>想要进入电动汽车（EV）行业的投资者应该能够承受各种风险。但这些风险与潜在回报相平衡。毕竟，这就是投资的意义所在。</blockquote></p><p> Three EV stocks that could supercharge your portfolio in 2022 and beyond ironically also each bring a unique and significant risk as an investment. There's no better way to vet a potential investment than to thoroughly review its risks. If you can be comfortable with the potential downside, now might be a good time to invest in these EV-sector names.</p><p><blockquote>具有讽刺意味的是，三只电动汽车股票可能会在2022年及以后增强您的投资组合，但每只股票都带来了独特而重大的投资风险。没有比彻底审查其风险更好的审查潜在投资的方法了。如果您能够接受潜在的负面影响，那么现在可能是投资这些电动汽车行业名称的好时机。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bcb0b015b34cd60db51bb86343dcbbe\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"935\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Nio: A second wind</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来：第二次风</b></blockquote></p><p> Chinese EV-maker&nbsp;<b>Nio</b>(NIO)&nbsp;took advantage of excessive investor enthusiasm, which drove its valuation to nearly $100 billion before the company had earned a dime in net earnings. After flirting with bankruptcy as recently as two years ago, the company raised money in the capital markets, and now has about $7.3 billion in cash on its balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商<b>蔚来</b>（蔚来）利用了投资者的过度热情，在该公司还没有赚到一毛钱的净利润之前，就将其估值推高到了近1000亿美元。在两年前濒临破产后，该公司在资本市场筹集了资金，截至2021年9月30日，其资产负债表上目前拥有约73亿美元现金。</blockquote></p><p> That second wind has resulted in the company delivering more than 150,000 cumulative vehicles, as of the end of November. Nio reports monthly deliveries, and the below chart shows how fast they have ramped up shipments since the start of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>截至11月底，第二次风使该公司累计交付了超过150,000辆汽车。蔚来报告每月交付量，下图显示了自2020年初以来他们增加出货量的速度。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8342eca7f9e9cb69ffa016615c11bbcb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1151\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data source: Nio. Chart by author.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来源：蔚来。作者图表。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Nio is also preparing to double its capacity and add new models, which hindered production in October 2021. The company took production down for the first half of the month in preparation for the new ET7 luxury sedan it will begin selling early in 2022. The increase in production capacity comes as the company is branching out of its native China into Europe. It has established a presence in Norway and intends to deliver vehicles in Germany next year.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来还准备将产能翻倍并增加新车型，这阻碍了2021年10月的生产。该公司减少了上半月的产量，为将于2022年初开始销售的新款ET7豪华轿车做准备。产能的增加正值该公司将业务从本土中国扩展到欧洲之际。它已在挪威建立了业务，并打算明年在德国交付车辆。</blockquote></p><p> Those two markets should lead global growth in EVs, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). EV sales in China and Europe led the world in 2020, with a combined total of 2.7 million units. In its 2021 global EV outlook, the agency offered two scenarios for the EV sector over the next decade.</p><p><blockquote>国际能源署(IEA)表示，这两个市场应该会引领全球电动汽车的增长。2020年，中国和欧洲的电动汽车销量领先全球，总计270万辆。该机构在其2021年全球电动汽车展望中为电动汽车行业提供了未来十年的两种情景。</blockquote></p><p> By 2030, it expects China and Europe to continue to lead the way with at least 16.6 million vehicles and as many as 25.3 million, if government initiatives focus more on sustainability. Nio looks to be in a prime spot in the biggest markets for explosive growth in the coming years, giving investors an opportunity, as long as the company executes well.</p><p><blockquote>到2030年，如果政府举措更加注重可持续发展，预计中国和欧洲将继续以至少1660万辆和多达2530万辆的数量领先。只要公司执行良好，蔚来看起来将在未来几年爆炸性增长的最大市场中处于领先地位，为投资者提供机会。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4accec987e9af0f29cc462664deb37d4\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Lucid's luxury electric Air sedan. Image source: Lucid Group.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Lucid的豪华电动空气轿车。图片来源：Lucid Group。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lucid: High expectations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid：高期望</b></blockquote></p><p> Analysts and investors following the EV sector have been watching&nbsp;<b>Lucid Group</b>(LCID)&nbsp;since well before it went public by merging with a&nbsp;special purpose acquisition company (SPAC)&nbsp;in late July. Peter Rawlinson, the company's CEO and chief technology officer (CTO), worked as lead engineer at&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>&nbsp;on its Model S development program. That made some believe his new company and its luxury electric sedans could be the first true competition for the leading EV company.</p><p><blockquote>关注电动汽车行业的分析师和投资者一直在关注<b>Lucid集团</b>(LCID)早在7月底与一家特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)合并上市之前就已上市。该公司首席执行官兼首席技术官(CTO)Peter Rawlinson曾担任首席工程师<b>特斯拉</b>关于其Model S开发计划。这让一些人相信他的新公司及其豪华电动轿车可能是这家领先电动汽车公司的第一次真正竞争。</blockquote></p><p> Lucid provided investors with lofty goals and projections prior to its public debut. Without expecting any meaningful revenue in 2021, the company said in a July 2021 investor presentation that it expects sales to exceed $2 billion in 2022. With plans to introduce its next vehicle, the Gravity luxury SUV, in late 2023, it hopes to be close to $10 billion in revenue for 2024.</p><p><blockquote>Lucid在首次公开募股之前为投资者提供了崇高的目标和预测。该公司在2021年7月的投资者演示中表示，预计2022年销售额将超过20亿美元，但预计2021年不会有任何有意义的收入。该公司计划于2023年底推出下一代汽车Gravity豪华SUV，希望2024年收入接近100亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scrutinizing several start-up companies that have gone public via SPAC and&nbsp;is now looking into certain early projections and statements that Lucid provided. Investors don't yet know the details of that subpoena, but it illuminates another risk associated with investing in early stage EV companies.</p><p><blockquote>但美国证券交易委员会(SEC)正在审查几家通过SPAC上市的初创公司，目前正在调查Lucid提供的某些早期预测和声明。投资者尚不知道该传票的细节，但它揭示了与投资早期电动汽车公司相关的另一个风险。</blockquote></p><p> The business itself is off to a good start, however. Lucid's first car launched on schedule, and the Air has won accolades, including being named<i>MotorTrend</i>2022 Car of the Year. It also has the highest EV battery-range rating given by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at 520 miles. Lucid may be on a path to greatness, but it still has a long road ahead. With a market cap of over $73 billion just as it is beginning production,it will need to execute perfectly to justify its valuation.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这项业务本身已经有了一个良好的开端。Lucid首款车如期上市，Air屡获殊荣，包括被命名<i>汽车趋势</i>2022年度汽车。它还拥有环境保护署(EPA)给出的最高电动汽车电池续航里程评级，为520英里。Lucid可能正在走向伟大，但它还有很长的路要走。该公司刚刚开始生产，市值就超过730亿美元，因此需要完美执行才能证明其估值合理。</blockquote></p><p> <b>ChargePoint: Exceeding early projections</b></p><p><blockquote><b>ChargePoint：超出早期预测</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> EV-charging network leader&nbsp;<b>ChargePoint Holdings</b>(CHPT)&nbsp;also went public through a SPAC merger and has reported multiple financial updates as a public company already. How Lucid measures up to its own projections remains to be seen, but so far, ChargePoint has achieved what it told investors it would, and more.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车充电网络领导者<b>ChargePoint控股</b>(CHPT)也通过SPAC合并上市，并已作为上市公司报告了多项财务更新。Lucid如何达到自己的预测还有待观察，但到目前为止，ChargePoint已经实现了它告诉投资者的目标，甚至更多。</blockquote></p><p> In the company's fiscal third-quarter 2022 report released this week, management increased revenue guidance for the fiscal-year period ending Jan. 31, 2022 for the second time since its public debut. ChargePoint told investors in a July presentation that it expected fiscal-year revenue of $198 million. That's now been moved up to a range of $235 million to $240 million.</p><p><blockquote>在该公司本周发布的2022财年第三季度报告中，管理层自上市以来第二次上调了截至2022年1月31日财年的收入指引。ChargePoint在7月份的一次演示中告诉投资者，预计财年收入为1.98亿美元。现在这一数字已上升至2.35亿至2.4亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> ChargePoint is also off to a fine start as a public company. It expects to continue to be the leading North American charging-network company and is also expanding in Europe. ChargePoint's gross margin increased 500 basis points to 25% in its most-recent quarter, compared to the prior-year period.</p><p><blockquote>ChargePoint作为一家上市公司也有了一个良好的开端。该公司预计将继续成为北美领先的充电网络公司，并在欧洲扩张。与去年同期相比，ChargePoint最近一个季度的毛利率增长了500个基点，达到25%。</blockquote></p><p> Though the company reported a larger net loss year over year, it increased revenue by 79%. As it builds out its physical charging ports, it will look toward profitability through its network subscription services. Its risks should also not be minimized.</p><p><blockquote>尽管该公司报告的净亏损同比更大，但收入却增长了79%。随着其物理充电端口的建设，它将通过其网络订阅服务寻求盈利。其风险也不应被低估。</blockquote></p><p> There will be plenty of competition, but ChargePoint has a head start and could be in position to gain a large piece of the rapidly growing EV charging-services pie.</p><p><blockquote>竞争将会很激烈，但ChargePoint处于领先地位，可能会在快速增长的电动汽车充电服务蛋糕中获得很大一部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Supercharged Electric-Vehicle Stocks to Buy in 2022 and Beyond<blockquote>2022年及以后值得买入的3只增压电动汽车股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Supercharged Electric-Vehicle Stocks to Buy in 2022 and Beyond<blockquote>2022年及以后值得买入的3只增压电动汽车股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-13 11:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>An investor who wants to dive into the electric-vehicle (EV) sector should be comfortable with a variety of risks. But those risks balance with potential rewards. That's what investing is all about, after all.</p><p><blockquote>想要进入电动汽车（EV）行业的投资者应该能够承受各种风险。但这些风险与潜在回报相平衡。毕竟，这就是投资的意义所在。</blockquote></p><p> Three EV stocks that could supercharge your portfolio in 2022 and beyond ironically also each bring a unique and significant risk as an investment. There's no better way to vet a potential investment than to thoroughly review its risks. If you can be comfortable with the potential downside, now might be a good time to invest in these EV-sector names.</p><p><blockquote>具有讽刺意味的是，三只电动汽车股票可能会在2022年及以后增强您的投资组合，但每只股票都带来了独特而重大的投资风险。没有比彻底审查其风险更好的审查潜在投资的方法了。如果您能够接受潜在的负面影响，那么现在可能是投资这些电动汽车行业名称的好时机。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bcb0b015b34cd60db51bb86343dcbbe\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"935\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Nio: A second wind</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来：第二次风</b></blockquote></p><p> Chinese EV-maker&nbsp;<b>Nio</b>(NIO)&nbsp;took advantage of excessive investor enthusiasm, which drove its valuation to nearly $100 billion before the company had earned a dime in net earnings. After flirting with bankruptcy as recently as two years ago, the company raised money in the capital markets, and now has about $7.3 billion in cash on its balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商<b>蔚来</b>（蔚来）利用了投资者的过度热情，在该公司还没有赚到一毛钱的净利润之前，就将其估值推高到了近1000亿美元。在两年前濒临破产后，该公司在资本市场筹集了资金，截至2021年9月30日，其资产负债表上目前拥有约73亿美元现金。</blockquote></p><p> That second wind has resulted in the company delivering more than 150,000 cumulative vehicles, as of the end of November. Nio reports monthly deliveries, and the below chart shows how fast they have ramped up shipments since the start of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>截至11月底，第二次风使该公司累计交付了超过150,000辆汽车。蔚来报告每月交付量，下图显示了自2020年初以来他们增加出货量的速度。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8342eca7f9e9cb69ffa016615c11bbcb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1151\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data source: Nio. Chart by author.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来源：蔚来。作者图表。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Nio is also preparing to double its capacity and add new models, which hindered production in October 2021. The company took production down for the first half of the month in preparation for the new ET7 luxury sedan it will begin selling early in 2022. The increase in production capacity comes as the company is branching out of its native China into Europe. It has established a presence in Norway and intends to deliver vehicles in Germany next year.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来还准备将产能翻倍并增加新车型，这阻碍了2021年10月的生产。该公司减少了上半月的产量，为将于2022年初开始销售的新款ET7豪华轿车做准备。产能的增加正值该公司将业务从本土中国扩展到欧洲之际。它已在挪威建立了业务，并打算明年在德国交付车辆。</blockquote></p><p> Those two markets should lead global growth in EVs, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). EV sales in China and Europe led the world in 2020, with a combined total of 2.7 million units. In its 2021 global EV outlook, the agency offered two scenarios for the EV sector over the next decade.</p><p><blockquote>国际能源署(IEA)表示，这两个市场应该会引领全球电动汽车的增长。2020年，中国和欧洲的电动汽车销量领先全球，总计270万辆。该机构在其2021年全球电动汽车展望中为电动汽车行业提供了未来十年的两种情景。</blockquote></p><p> By 2030, it expects China and Europe to continue to lead the way with at least 16.6 million vehicles and as many as 25.3 million, if government initiatives focus more on sustainability. Nio looks to be in a prime spot in the biggest markets for explosive growth in the coming years, giving investors an opportunity, as long as the company executes well.</p><p><blockquote>到2030年，如果政府举措更加注重可持续发展，预计中国和欧洲将继续以至少1660万辆和多达2530万辆的数量领先。只要公司执行良好，蔚来看起来将在未来几年爆炸性增长的最大市场中处于领先地位，为投资者提供机会。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4accec987e9af0f29cc462664deb37d4\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Lucid's luxury electric Air sedan. Image source: Lucid Group.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Lucid的豪华电动空气轿车。图片来源：Lucid Group。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lucid: High expectations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>Lucid：高期望</b></blockquote></p><p> Analysts and investors following the EV sector have been watching&nbsp;<b>Lucid Group</b>(LCID)&nbsp;since well before it went public by merging with a&nbsp;special purpose acquisition company (SPAC)&nbsp;in late July. Peter Rawlinson, the company's CEO and chief technology officer (CTO), worked as lead engineer at&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>&nbsp;on its Model S development program. That made some believe his new company and its luxury electric sedans could be the first true competition for the leading EV company.</p><p><blockquote>关注电动汽车行业的分析师和投资者一直在关注<b>Lucid集团</b>(LCID)早在7月底与一家特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)合并上市之前就已上市。该公司首席执行官兼首席技术官(CTO)Peter Rawlinson曾担任首席工程师<b>特斯拉</b>关于其Model S开发计划。这让一些人相信他的新公司及其豪华电动轿车可能是这家领先电动汽车公司的第一次真正竞争。</blockquote></p><p> Lucid provided investors with lofty goals and projections prior to its public debut. Without expecting any meaningful revenue in 2021, the company said in a July 2021 investor presentation that it expects sales to exceed $2 billion in 2022. With plans to introduce its next vehicle, the Gravity luxury SUV, in late 2023, it hopes to be close to $10 billion in revenue for 2024.</p><p><blockquote>Lucid在首次公开募股之前为投资者提供了崇高的目标和预测。该公司在2021年7月的投资者演示中表示，预计2022年销售额将超过20亿美元，但预计2021年不会有任何有意义的收入。该公司计划于2023年底推出下一代汽车Gravity豪华SUV，希望2024年收入接近100亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scrutinizing several start-up companies that have gone public via SPAC and&nbsp;is now looking into certain early projections and statements that Lucid provided. Investors don't yet know the details of that subpoena, but it illuminates another risk associated with investing in early stage EV companies.</p><p><blockquote>但美国证券交易委员会(SEC)正在审查几家通过SPAC上市的初创公司，目前正在调查Lucid提供的某些早期预测和声明。投资者尚不知道该传票的细节，但它揭示了与投资早期电动汽车公司相关的另一个风险。</blockquote></p><p> The business itself is off to a good start, however. Lucid's first car launched on schedule, and the Air has won accolades, including being named<i>MotorTrend</i>2022 Car of the Year. It also has the highest EV battery-range rating given by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at 520 miles. Lucid may be on a path to greatness, but it still has a long road ahead. With a market cap of over $73 billion just as it is beginning production,it will need to execute perfectly to justify its valuation.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这项业务本身已经有了一个良好的开端。Lucid首款车如期上市，Air屡获殊荣，包括被命名<i>汽车趋势</i>2022年度汽车。它还拥有环境保护署(EPA)给出的最高电动汽车电池续航里程评级，为520英里。Lucid可能正在走向伟大，但它还有很长的路要走。该公司刚刚开始生产，市值就超过730亿美元，因此需要完美执行才能证明其估值合理。</blockquote></p><p> <b>ChargePoint: Exceeding early projections</b></p><p><blockquote><b>ChargePoint：超出早期预测</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> EV-charging network leader&nbsp;<b>ChargePoint Holdings</b>(CHPT)&nbsp;also went public through a SPAC merger and has reported multiple financial updates as a public company already. How Lucid measures up to its own projections remains to be seen, but so far, ChargePoint has achieved what it told investors it would, and more.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车充电网络领导者<b>ChargePoint控股</b>(CHPT)也通过SPAC合并上市，并已作为上市公司报告了多项财务更新。Lucid如何达到自己的预测还有待观察，但到目前为止，ChargePoint已经实现了它告诉投资者的目标，甚至更多。</blockquote></p><p> In the company's fiscal third-quarter 2022 report released this week, management increased revenue guidance for the fiscal-year period ending Jan. 31, 2022 for the second time since its public debut. ChargePoint told investors in a July presentation that it expected fiscal-year revenue of $198 million. That's now been moved up to a range of $235 million to $240 million.</p><p><blockquote>在该公司本周发布的2022财年第三季度报告中，管理层自上市以来第二次上调了截至2022年1月31日财年的收入指引。ChargePoint在7月份的一次演示中告诉投资者，预计财年收入为1.98亿美元。现在这一数字已上升至2.35亿至2.4亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> ChargePoint is also off to a fine start as a public company. It expects to continue to be the leading North American charging-network company and is also expanding in Europe. ChargePoint's gross margin increased 500 basis points to 25% in its most-recent quarter, compared to the prior-year period.</p><p><blockquote>ChargePoint作为一家上市公司也有了一个良好的开端。该公司预计将继续成为北美领先的充电网络公司，并在欧洲扩张。与去年同期相比，ChargePoint最近一个季度的毛利率增长了500个基点，达到25%。</blockquote></p><p> Though the company reported a larger net loss year over year, it increased revenue by 79%. As it builds out its physical charging ports, it will look toward profitability through its network subscription services. Its risks should also not be minimized.</p><p><blockquote>尽管该公司报告的净亏损同比更大，但收入却增长了79%。随着其物理充电端口的建设，它将通过其网络订阅服务寻求盈利。其风险也不应被低估。</blockquote></p><p> There will be plenty of competition, but ChargePoint has a head start and could be in position to gain a large piece of the rapidly growing EV charging-services pie.</p><p><blockquote>竞争将会很激烈，但ChargePoint处于领先地位，可能会在快速增长的电动汽车充电服务蛋糕中获得很大一部分。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/12/3-supercharged-ev-stocks-to-buy-in-2022-and-beyond/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LCID":"Lucid Group Inc","NIO":"蔚来","CHPT":"ChargePoint Holdings Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/12/3-supercharged-ev-stocks-to-buy-in-2022-and-beyond/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103876293","content_text":"An investor who wants to dive into the electric-vehicle (EV) sector should be comfortable with a variety of risks. But those risks balance with potential rewards. That's what investing is all about, after all.\nThree EV stocks that could supercharge your portfolio in 2022 and beyond ironically also each bring a unique and significant risk as an investment. There's no better way to vet a potential investment than to thoroughly review its risks. If you can be comfortable with the potential downside, now might be a good time to invest in these EV-sector names.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nNio: A second wind\nChinese EV-maker Nio(NIO) took advantage of excessive investor enthusiasm, which drove its valuation to nearly $100 billion before the company had earned a dime in net earnings. After flirting with bankruptcy as recently as two years ago, the company raised money in the capital markets, and now has about $7.3 billion in cash on its balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2021.\nThat second wind has resulted in the company delivering more than 150,000 cumulative vehicles, as of the end of November. Nio reports monthly deliveries, and the below chart shows how fast they have ramped up shipments since the start of 2020.\nData source: Nio. Chart by author.\nNio is also preparing to double its capacity and add new models, which hindered production in October 2021. The company took production down for the first half of the month in preparation for the new ET7 luxury sedan it will begin selling early in 2022. The increase in production capacity comes as the company is branching out of its native China into Europe. It has established a presence in Norway and intends to deliver vehicles in Germany next year.\nThose two markets should lead global growth in EVs, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). EV sales in China and Europe led the world in 2020, with a combined total of 2.7 million units. In its 2021 global EV outlook, the agency offered two scenarios for the EV sector over the next decade.\nBy 2030, it expects China and Europe to continue to lead the way with at least 16.6 million vehicles and as many as 25.3 million, if government initiatives focus more on sustainability. Nio looks to be in a prime spot in the biggest markets for explosive growth in the coming years, giving investors an opportunity, as long as the company executes well.\nLucid's luxury electric Air sedan. Image source: Lucid Group.\nLucid: High expectations\nAnalysts and investors following the EV sector have been watching Lucid Group(LCID) since well before it went public by merging with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in late July. Peter Rawlinson, the company's CEO and chief technology officer (CTO), worked as lead engineer at Tesla on its Model S development program. That made some believe his new company and its luxury electric sedans could be the first true competition for the leading EV company.\nLucid provided investors with lofty goals and projections prior to its public debut. Without expecting any meaningful revenue in 2021, the company said in a July 2021 investor presentation that it expects sales to exceed $2 billion in 2022. With plans to introduce its next vehicle, the Gravity luxury SUV, in late 2023, it hopes to be close to $10 billion in revenue for 2024.\nBut the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scrutinizing several start-up companies that have gone public via SPAC and is now looking into certain early projections and statements that Lucid provided. Investors don't yet know the details of that subpoena, but it illuminates another risk associated with investing in early stage EV companies.\nThe business itself is off to a good start, however. Lucid's first car launched on schedule, and the Air has won accolades, including being namedMotorTrend2022 Car of the Year. It also has the highest EV battery-range rating given by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at 520 miles. Lucid may be on a path to greatness, but it still has a long road ahead. With a market cap of over $73 billion just as it is beginning production,it will need to execute perfectly to justify its valuation.\nChargePoint: Exceeding early projections\nEV-charging network leader ChargePoint Holdings(CHPT) also went public through a SPAC merger and has reported multiple financial updates as a public company already. How Lucid measures up to its own projections remains to be seen, but so far, ChargePoint has achieved what it told investors it would, and more.\nIn the company's fiscal third-quarter 2022 report released this week, management increased revenue guidance for the fiscal-year period ending Jan. 31, 2022 for the second time since its public debut. ChargePoint told investors in a July presentation that it expected fiscal-year revenue of $198 million. That's now been moved up to a range of $235 million to $240 million.\nChargePoint is also off to a fine start as a public company. It expects to continue to be the leading North American charging-network company and is also expanding in Europe. ChargePoint's gross margin increased 500 basis points to 25% in its most-recent quarter, compared to the prior-year period.\nThough the company reported a larger net loss year over year, it increased revenue by 79%. As it builds out its physical charging ports, it will look toward profitability through its network subscription services. Its risks should also not be minimized.\nThere will be plenty of competition, but ChargePoint has a head start and could be in position to gain a large piece of the rapidly growing EV charging-services pie.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9,"LCID":0.9,"CHPT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1099,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606036907,"gmtCreate":1638800058155,"gmtModify":1638800067659,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tq","listText":"Tq","text":"Tq","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606036907","repostId":"1107494736","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1107494736","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638799191,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107494736?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-06 21:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock Is an Attractive Buy, Says KeyBanc. Price Target Set at $191.<blockquote>KeyBanc表示，苹果股票是一个有吸引力的买入。目标价定为191美元。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107494736","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the ","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the stock with a bullish outlook, citing growth in the tech giant’s services segment.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价周一上涨，此前KeyBanc Capital Markets分析师以这家科技巨头服务领域的增长为由，对该股前景看好。</blockquote></p><p> Analyst Brandon Nispel rated the stock Overweight with a $191 price target. The target presents an 18% increase from Apple’s (ticker: AAPL) $161.84 closing price on Friday. The stock was up 1.2% to $163.73 in premarket trading Monday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师Brandon Nispel将该股跑赢大盘评级为191美元。该目标较苹果（股票代码：AAPL）周五161.84美元的收盘价上涨18%。周一盘前交易中，该股上涨1.2%，至163.73美元。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 42 analysts covering the stock surveyed by FactSet, 32 have it at a Buy or Overweight rating, nine rated it at Hold, and one rated it Underweight.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的42名分析师中，32名分析师给予该股买入或跑赢大盘评级，9名分析师给予持有，1名分析师给予跑输大盘评级。</blockquote></p><p> “While AAPL is expensive by historical valuations, we find AAPL attractive relative to other mega-caps,” Nispel wrote on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔周一写道：“虽然从历史估值来看，苹果公司价格昂贵，但我们发现苹果公司相对于其他大型股具有吸引力。”</blockquote></p><p> The analyst outlined three main reasons for his bullish take. Nispel doesn’t believe iPhone unit sales have peaked, with the 5G upgrade cycle potentially pushing Apple past its current peak; he believes the company has managed to increase its product breadth to reduce reliability on iPhone sales; and he foresees services to grow at rates multiple times faster than user growth.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师概述了他看涨的三个主要原因。Nispel认为iPhone销量尚未见顶，5G升级周期可能会推动苹果超过目前的峰值；他认为，该公司已设法增加其产品广度，以降低iPhone销售的可靠性；他预计服务的增长速度将是用户增长速度的数倍。</blockquote></p><p> The analyst forecasts Apple to have 1.09 billion active iPhones and 1.8 billion active installed devices by the end of the first quarter of the 2022 fiscal year. This presents a 7% and 8% year-over-year increase, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>该分析师预测，到2022财年第一季度末，苹果将拥有10.9亿部活跃iPhone和18亿部活跃安装设备。这分别同比增长7%和8%。</blockquote></p><p> “This shows a healthy growing user base where Apple iPhone market share is low relative to key geographies outside the United States,” Nispel wrote. “As the installed base grows, a larger base can support more sales on lower upgrade rates.”</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道：“这表明用户群健康增长，相对于美国以外的主要地区，苹果iPhone市场份额较低。”“随着安装基础的增长，更大的基础可以以较低的升级率支持更多的销售。”</blockquote></p><p> Apple’s international segment is likely to grow faster in the coming years as other countries adapt to 5G, prompting a wave of upgrades to compatible hardware, Nispel wrote. He estimates every 1% increase in 5G upgrade rates could drive an incremental 11 million iPhone unit sales.</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道，随着其他国家适应5G，苹果的国际市场在未来几年可能会增长更快，从而引发一波兼容硬件的升级浪潮。他估计，5G升级率每增加1%，iPhone销量就可能增加1100万部。</blockquote></p><p> As hardware adoption grows, so does Apple’s services business. The segment, which includes services such as Apple TV+, Music, News+, AppleCare, Advertising, and Cloud, has grown 27% in the 2021 fiscal year. Over time, it could become a key profitability driver, growing to more than $100 billion by 2024, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>随着硬件采用率的增长，苹果的服务业务也在增长。该部门包括苹果TV+、音乐、News+、AppleCare、广告和云等服务，在2021财年增长了27%。Nispel表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会成为关键的盈利驱动力，到2024年将增长到1000亿美元以上。</blockquote></p><p> Nispel recognized that Apple’s App Store legal battles were concerning, but were “likely more a bend, not break outcome.” The company has had to make modest changes to its App Store guidance in response to court rulings and regulatory changes, including lowering its commission for some developers. It will likely make more concessions over time, such as allowing developers to provide third-party payment options, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔承认，苹果的应用商店法律诉讼令人担忧，但“可能更多的是一个转变，而不是突破的结果”。该公司不得不对其应用商店指南进行适度修改，以应对法院裁决和监管变化，包括降低一些开发者的佣金。尼斯佩尔表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会做出更多让步，例如允许开发商提供第三方支付选项。</blockquote></p><p> “We expect regulation to take time to implement, and believe Apple’s competitive advantage is unlikely to be substantially harmed,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“我们预计监管需要时间来实施，并相信苹果的竞争优势不太可能受到实质性损害，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock Is an Attractive Buy, Says KeyBanc. Price Target Set at $191.<blockquote>KeyBanc表示，苹果股票是一个有吸引力的买入。目标价定为191美元。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock Is an Attractive Buy, Says KeyBanc. Price Target Set at $191.<blockquote>KeyBanc表示，苹果股票是一个有吸引力的买入。目标价定为191美元。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-06 21:59</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple&nbsp;shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the stock with a bullish outlook, citing growth in the tech giant’s services segment.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价周一上涨，此前KeyBanc Capital Markets分析师以这家科技巨头服务领域的增长为由，对该股前景看好。</blockquote></p><p> Analyst Brandon Nispel rated the stock Overweight with a $191 price target. The target presents an 18% increase from Apple’s (ticker: AAPL) $161.84 closing price on Friday. The stock was up 1.2% to $163.73 in premarket trading Monday.</p><p><blockquote>分析师Brandon Nispel将该股跑赢大盘评级为191美元。该目标较苹果（股票代码：AAPL）周五161.84美元的收盘价上涨18%。周一盘前交易中，该股上涨1.2%，至163.73美元。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 42 analysts covering the stock surveyed by FactSet, 32 have it at a Buy or Overweight rating, nine rated it at Hold, and one rated it Underweight.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet调查的42名分析师中，32名分析师给予该股买入或跑赢大盘评级，9名分析师给予持有，1名分析师给予跑输大盘评级。</blockquote></p><p> “While AAPL is expensive by historical valuations, we find AAPL attractive relative to other mega-caps,” Nispel wrote on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔周一写道：“虽然从历史估值来看，苹果公司价格昂贵，但我们发现苹果公司相对于其他大型股具有吸引力。”</blockquote></p><p> The analyst outlined three main reasons for his bullish take. Nispel doesn’t believe iPhone unit sales have peaked, with the 5G upgrade cycle potentially pushing Apple past its current peak; he believes the company has managed to increase its product breadth to reduce reliability on iPhone sales; and he foresees services to grow at rates multiple times faster than user growth.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师概述了他看涨的三个主要原因。Nispel认为iPhone销量尚未见顶，5G升级周期可能会推动苹果超过目前的峰值；他认为，该公司已设法增加其产品广度，以降低iPhone销售的可靠性；他预计服务的增长速度将是用户增长速度的数倍。</blockquote></p><p> The analyst forecasts Apple to have 1.09 billion active iPhones and 1.8 billion active installed devices by the end of the first quarter of the 2022 fiscal year. This presents a 7% and 8% year-over-year increase, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>该分析师预测，到2022财年第一季度末，苹果将拥有10.9亿部活跃iPhone和18亿部活跃安装设备。这分别同比增长7%和8%。</blockquote></p><p> “This shows a healthy growing user base where Apple iPhone market share is low relative to key geographies outside the United States,” Nispel wrote. “As the installed base grows, a larger base can support more sales on lower upgrade rates.”</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道：“这表明用户群健康增长，相对于美国以外的主要地区，苹果iPhone市场份额较低。”“随着安装基础的增长，更大的基础可以以较低的升级率支持更多的销售。”</blockquote></p><p> Apple’s international segment is likely to grow faster in the coming years as other countries adapt to 5G, prompting a wave of upgrades to compatible hardware, Nispel wrote. He estimates every 1% increase in 5G upgrade rates could drive an incremental 11 million iPhone unit sales.</p><p><blockquote>Nispel写道，随着其他国家适应5G，苹果的国际市场在未来几年可能会增长更快，从而引发一波兼容硬件的升级浪潮。他估计，5G升级率每增加1%，iPhone销量就可能增加1100万部。</blockquote></p><p> As hardware adoption grows, so does Apple’s services business. The segment, which includes services such as Apple TV+, Music, News+, AppleCare, Advertising, and Cloud, has grown 27% in the 2021 fiscal year. Over time, it could become a key profitability driver, growing to more than $100 billion by 2024, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>随着硬件采用率的增长，苹果的服务业务也在增长。该部门包括苹果TV+、音乐、News+、AppleCare、广告和云等服务，在2021财年增长了27%。Nispel表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会成为关键的盈利驱动力，到2024年将增长到1000亿美元以上。</blockquote></p><p> Nispel recognized that Apple’s App Store legal battles were concerning, but were “likely more a bend, not break outcome.” The company has had to make modest changes to its App Store guidance in response to court rulings and regulatory changes, including lowering its commission for some developers. It will likely make more concessions over time, such as allowing developers to provide third-party payment options, Nispel said.</p><p><blockquote>尼斯佩尔承认，苹果的应用商店法律诉讼令人担忧，但“可能更多的是一个转变，而不是突破的结果”。该公司不得不对其应用商店指南进行适度修改，以应对法院裁决和监管变化，包括降低一些开发者的佣金。尼斯佩尔表示，随着时间的推移，它可能会做出更多让步，例如允许开发商提供第三方支付选项。</blockquote></p><p> “We expect regulation to take time to implement, and believe Apple’s competitive advantage is unlikely to be substantially harmed,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“我们预计监管需要时间来实施，并相信苹果的竞争优势不太可能受到实质性损害，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-aapl-stock-attractive-buy-51638798446?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-aapl-stock-attractive-buy-51638798446?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107494736","content_text":"Apple shares were rising Monday after analysts at KeyBanc Capital Markets initiated coverage on the stock with a bullish outlook, citing growth in the tech giant’s services segment.\nAnalyst Brandon Nispel rated the stock Overweight with a $191 price target. The target presents an 18% increase from Apple’s (ticker: AAPL) $161.84 closing price on Friday. The stock was up 1.2% to $163.73 in premarket trading Monday.\nOf the 42 analysts covering the stock surveyed by FactSet, 32 have it at a Buy or Overweight rating, nine rated it at Hold, and one rated it Underweight.\n“While AAPL is expensive by historical valuations, we find AAPL attractive relative to other mega-caps,” Nispel wrote on Monday.\nThe analyst outlined three main reasons for his bullish take. Nispel doesn’t believe iPhone unit sales have peaked, with the 5G upgrade cycle potentially pushing Apple past its current peak; he believes the company has managed to increase its product breadth to reduce reliability on iPhone sales; and he foresees services to grow at rates multiple times faster than user growth.\nThe analyst forecasts Apple to have 1.09 billion active iPhones and 1.8 billion active installed devices by the end of the first quarter of the 2022 fiscal year. This presents a 7% and 8% year-over-year increase, respectively.\n“This shows a healthy growing user base where Apple iPhone market share is low relative to key geographies outside the United States,” Nispel wrote. “As the installed base grows, a larger base can support more sales on lower upgrade rates.”\nApple’s international segment is likely to grow faster in the coming years as other countries adapt to 5G, prompting a wave of upgrades to compatible hardware, Nispel wrote. He estimates every 1% increase in 5G upgrade rates could drive an incremental 11 million iPhone unit sales.\nAs hardware adoption grows, so does Apple’s services business. The segment, which includes services such as Apple TV+, Music, News+, AppleCare, Advertising, and Cloud, has grown 27% in the 2021 fiscal year. Over time, it could become a key profitability driver, growing to more than $100 billion by 2024, Nispel said.\nNispel recognized that Apple’s App Store legal battles were concerning, but were “likely more a bend, not break outcome.” The company has had to make modest changes to its App Store guidance in response to court rulings and regulatory changes, including lowering its commission for some developers. It will likely make more concessions over time, such as allowing developers to provide third-party payment options, Nispel said.\n“We expect regulation to take time to implement, and believe Apple’s competitive advantage is unlikely to be substantially harmed,” he added.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":572,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692141898,"gmtCreate":1640884591822,"gmtModify":1640884591944,"author":{"id":"3569730362364110","authorId":"3569730362364110","name":"CSK88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/831855576c5b2d28ba9be7798d3c575e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569730362364110","idStr":"3569730362364110"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692141898","repostId":"1198843840","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198843840","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640876050,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198843840?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-30 22:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Some Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198843840","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fel","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>早盘部分半导体股下跌。美光科技跌超2%，AMD跌超1%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efacf4051c66545659fa3d5d20db533d\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"430\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Some Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSome Semiconductor Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading<blockquote>部分半导体股早盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-30 22:54</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>早盘部分半导体股下跌。美光科技跌超2%，AMD跌超1%。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efacf4051c66545659fa3d5d20db533d\" tg-width=\"422\" tg-height=\"430\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MU":"美光科技","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198843840","content_text":"Some semiconductor stocks dropped in morning trading.Micron Technology fell more than 2% and AMD fell more than 1%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9,"MU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2311,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}