VivalaRan的个人主页 - 老虎社区

VivalaRan

VivalaRan

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

8关注

6粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-06-17

Hmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-10

Hmmmm

Is Bill.com the Cathie Wood Stock for You?<blockquote>Bill.com是您的Cathie Wood股票吗？</blockquote>

2021-04-09

Hmmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-07

Hmmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-05

Hmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-04

Hmmmm

Wall Street Has Given Up on These 3 Stocks, and That's a Huge Mistake<blockquote>华尔街放弃了这三只股票，这是一个巨大的错误</blockquote>

2021-04-03

Hmmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-02

Hmmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-30

Hmmmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-29

Hmmmmm

CFDs - The Dirty Little Secret Behind The Collapse Of Archegos<blockquote>差价合约——Archegos倒闭背后的肮脏小秘密</blockquote>

2021-03-29

Hmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-24

Hmmmmm

@Jinkachu:$Atossa Genetics(ATOS)$gg wp what happen

2021-03-24

Hmmmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-22

Hmmmm

Some “meme” stocks are slipping<blockquote>一些“模因”股票正在下滑</blockquote>

2021-03-21

Hmmmmm

Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让SLR救助到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>

2021-03-20

$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$Stonk please

2021-03-17

Hmmm

Squarespace raises $300M at a staggering $10B valuation<blockquote>Squarespace以惊人的100亿美元估值筹集3亿美元</blockquote>

2021-03-16

Hmm hmm

Stocks That Could Benefit as the U.S. Tries to Fix the Chip Shortage<blockquote>随着美国试图解决芯片短缺问题，股票可能受益</blockquote>

2021-03-16

Hmm hmm

2021-03-15

Hmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573442142945386","uuid":"3573442142945386","gmtCreate":1610348119566,"gmtModify":1611152810668,"name":"VivalaRan","pinyin":"vivalaran","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":6,"headSize":8,"tweetSize":35,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.31","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"60.84%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":161491678,"gmtCreate":1623937371194,"gmtModify":1634025635337,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/161491678","repostId":"2144174158","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2283,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":346246264,"gmtCreate":1618057074558,"gmtModify":1634295040650,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/346246264","repostId":"1106014844","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106014844","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617979503,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106014844?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-09 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Bill.com the Cathie Wood Stock for You?<blockquote>Bill.com是您的Cathie Wood股票吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106014844","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.\nWhen Cathie Wood adds a stock or i","content":"<p>This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.</p><p><blockquote>这家金融科技公司自上市以来已上涨约300%。</blockquote></p><p> When Cathie Wood adds a stock or increases her positions in one of her portfolios, people pay attention. Wood is the founder and CEO of ARK Invest, a company that runs some of the top-performing exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Her actively managed ETFs -- including&nbsp;<b>ARK Innovation</b>,<b>ARK Genomic Revolution</b>, and&nbsp;<b>ARK Next Generation Internet</b>&nbsp;-- are mostly focused on technology stocks and have all posted huge returns over the past five years.</p><p><blockquote>当凯西·伍德(Cathie Wood)增加一只股票或增加其投资组合中的头寸时，人们会关注。伍德是ARK Invest的创始人兼首席执行官，该公司运营着一些表现最好的交易所交易基金(ETF)。她积极管理的ETF——包括<b>方舟创新</b>,<b>方舟基因组革命</b>，和<b>方舟下一代互联网</b>——大多专注于科技股，并且在过去五年中都取得了巨额回报。</blockquote></p><p> At the end of March, Wood increased her investment in a company called&nbsp;<b>Bill.com</b>(NYSE:BILL)in one of her portfolios,<b>ARK Fintech Innovation</b>. It caught our attention, so let's take a look at the stock to see if it's one you should consider buying.</p><p><blockquote>3月底，伍德增加了对一家名为<b>Bill.com</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BILL）在她的一个投资组合中，<b>方舟金融科技创新</b>.它引起了我们的注意，所以让我们看看这只股票，看看它是否是您应该考虑购买的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>On cloud nine</b></p><p><blockquote><b>九霄云外</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's cloud-based platform simplifies billing, payment processing, accounting, and other back-office operations for small- and mid-sized business. The platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the invoicing and bill paying process -- essentially, it allows companies to automate these jobs, saving money on doing it in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com基于云的平台简化了中小型企业的计费、支付处理、会计和其他后台操作。该平台使用人工智能（AI）和机器学习来简化发票和账单支付流程——本质上，它允许公司自动化这些工作，从而节省内部工作的资金。</blockquote></p><p> Since the company went public in December 2019, its stock price has more than quadrupled, from $36 per share when it started trading to more than $157 at Thursday's close. It gained 171% in 2020 and is up more than 15% year to date in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>自该公司2019年12月上市以来，其股价已翻了两番多，从开始交易时的每股36美元涨至周四收盘时的每股157美元以上。该股在2020年上涨了171%，2021年迄今上涨了15%以上。</blockquote></p><p> The company makes money mostly on subscriptions its clients pay for the service, so it's a reliable, repeatable income stream that grows as it adds clients. The company also makes a far smaller percentage of revenue on interest earned holding funds for clients. In the fiscal second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, revenue spiked 38% year over year to $54 million, with $52.3 million coming from subscription and transaction fees.</p><p><blockquote>该公司主要通过客户为服务付费的订阅来赚钱，因此这是一个可靠、可重复的收入来源，随着客户的增加而增长。该公司为客户持有基金所赚取的利息收入比例也要小得多。在截至12月31日的第二财季，收入同比飙升38%至5400万美元，其中5230万美元来自订阅和交易费用。</blockquote></p><p> The company is not yet profitable, posting a net loss of $17.2 million in the quarter, but it posted a huge gross margin of 75%, which is the revenue after subtracting the cost of producing the item being sold. So while it may not be profitable for a few more quarters. But once its investments in its technology and operations increase operating efficiency, those high gross margins will eventually translate into high profit margins.</p><p><blockquote>该公司尚未盈利，本季度净亏损1720万美元，但毛利率高达75%，这是减去所售商品的生产成本后的收入。因此，虽然它可能在未来几个季度内无法盈利。但一旦其对技术和运营的投资提高了运营效率，这些高毛利率最终将转化为高利润率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Pardon the disruption</b></p><p><blockquote><b>抱歉打扰了</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com has more than 100,000 customers, up nearly 30% from the previous year. While this is a very competitive space,Bill.com is a disruptor, and there is a huge market opportunity. As my Foolish colleagues&nbsp;Jason Moser and Matthew Frankel&nbsp;pointed out in a recent podcast, there are 20 million small- and mid-sized businesses and an addressable market of $30 billion globally, including $9 billion in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com拥有超过10万名客户，比上年增长近30%。虽然这是一个竞争非常激烈的领域，但Bill.com是一个颠覆者，存在巨大的市场机会。正如我愚蠢的同事杰森·莫泽和马修·弗兰克尔在最近的播客中指出的那样，全球有2000万家中小企业和300亿美元的潜在市场，其中美国有90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But founder and CEO Rene Lacerte thinks of the&nbsp;fintech&nbsp;not just in terms of customers, but of the network of 2.5 million \"members,\" including the users and partners of all of its clients. \"We believe we are the leading digital B2B payments platform for SMBs (small and mid-sized businesses) and operate one of the largest B2B networks in the United States,\" Lacerte said on the&nbsp;most recent earnings call. That is a huge network of users on which to grow. The bigger the network, the more potential value it has for its members. Also, this growth allows Bill.com the opportunity to form deeper relationships with those on the network, offering additional products and services.</p><p><blockquote>但创始人兼首席执行官Rene Lacerte不仅从客户的角度看待金融科技，还从250万“会员”的角度看待金融科技，包括所有客户的用户和合作伙伴。Lacerte在最近的财报看涨期权上表示：“我们相信我们是SMB（中小型企业）领先的数字B2B支付平台，并运营着美国最大的B2B网络之一。”这是一个巨大的用户网络，可以在此基础上成长。网络越大，对其成员的潜在价值就越大。此外，这种增长使Bill.com有机会与网络上的人建立更深层次的关系，提供额外的产品和服务。</blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's other potential competitive advantage is its AI, which gets more intuitive and robust the more customers it gets and the more data it gathers. The better the AI, the more efficient, convenient and useful the service becomes.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com的另一个潜在竞争优势是其人工智能，它获得的客户越多，收集的数据越多，人工智能就会变得更加直观和强大。人工智能越好，服务就变得越高效、越方便、越有用。</blockquote></p><p> This is a young, disruptive company that's in growth mode, with a low-expense business model and high earnings potential, that will soon be profitable. If you are looking for a growth stock with long-term potential, this Cathie Wood stock -- one she has identified as a fintech innovator -- would not be a bad choice.</p><p><blockquote>这是一家年轻的、颠覆性的公司，正处于增长模式，具有低费用的商业模式和高盈利潜力，很快就会盈利。如果您正在寻找一只具有长期潜力的成长型股票，那么这只Cathie Wood股票（她将其视为金融科技创新者）将是一个不错的选择。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Bill.com the Cathie Wood Stock for You?<blockquote>Bill.com是您的Cathie Wood股票吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Bill.com the Cathie Wood Stock for You?<blockquote>Bill.com是您的Cathie Wood股票吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-09 22:45</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.</p><p><blockquote>这家金融科技公司自上市以来已上涨约300%。</blockquote></p><p> When Cathie Wood adds a stock or increases her positions in one of her portfolios, people pay attention. Wood is the founder and CEO of ARK Invest, a company that runs some of the top-performing exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Her actively managed ETFs -- including&nbsp;<b>ARK Innovation</b>,<b>ARK Genomic Revolution</b>, and&nbsp;<b>ARK Next Generation Internet</b>&nbsp;-- are mostly focused on technology stocks and have all posted huge returns over the past five years.</p><p><blockquote>当凯西·伍德(Cathie Wood)增加一只股票或增加其投资组合中的头寸时，人们会关注。伍德是ARK Invest的创始人兼首席执行官，该公司运营着一些表现最好的交易所交易基金(ETF)。她积极管理的ETF——包括<b>方舟创新</b>,<b>方舟基因组革命</b>，和<b>方舟下一代互联网</b>——大多专注于科技股，并且在过去五年中都取得了巨额回报。</blockquote></p><p> At the end of March, Wood increased her investment in a company called&nbsp;<b>Bill.com</b>(NYSE:BILL)in one of her portfolios,<b>ARK Fintech Innovation</b>. It caught our attention, so let's take a look at the stock to see if it's one you should consider buying.</p><p><blockquote>3月底，伍德增加了对一家名为<b>Bill.com</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BILL）在她的一个投资组合中，<b>方舟金融科技创新</b>.它引起了我们的注意，所以让我们看看这只股票，看看它是否是您应该考虑购买的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>On cloud nine</b></p><p><blockquote><b>九霄云外</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's cloud-based platform simplifies billing, payment processing, accounting, and other back-office operations for small- and mid-sized business. The platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the invoicing and bill paying process -- essentially, it allows companies to automate these jobs, saving money on doing it in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com基于云的平台简化了中小型企业的计费、支付处理、会计和其他后台操作。该平台使用人工智能（AI）和机器学习来简化发票和账单支付流程——本质上，它允许公司自动化这些工作，从而节省内部工作的资金。</blockquote></p><p> Since the company went public in December 2019, its stock price has more than quadrupled, from $36 per share when it started trading to more than $157 at Thursday's close. It gained 171% in 2020 and is up more than 15% year to date in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>自该公司2019年12月上市以来，其股价已翻了两番多，从开始交易时的每股36美元涨至周四收盘时的每股157美元以上。该股在2020年上涨了171%，2021年迄今上涨了15%以上。</blockquote></p><p> The company makes money mostly on subscriptions its clients pay for the service, so it's a reliable, repeatable income stream that grows as it adds clients. The company also makes a far smaller percentage of revenue on interest earned holding funds for clients. In the fiscal second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, revenue spiked 38% year over year to $54 million, with $52.3 million coming from subscription and transaction fees.</p><p><blockquote>该公司主要通过客户为服务付费的订阅来赚钱，因此这是一个可靠、可重复的收入来源，随着客户的增加而增长。该公司为客户持有基金所赚取的利息收入比例也要小得多。在截至12月31日的第二财季，收入同比飙升38%至5400万美元，其中5230万美元来自订阅和交易费用。</blockquote></p><p> The company is not yet profitable, posting a net loss of $17.2 million in the quarter, but it posted a huge gross margin of 75%, which is the revenue after subtracting the cost of producing the item being sold. So while it may not be profitable for a few more quarters. But once its investments in its technology and operations increase operating efficiency, those high gross margins will eventually translate into high profit margins.</p><p><blockquote>该公司尚未盈利，本季度净亏损1720万美元，但毛利率高达75%，这是减去所售商品的生产成本后的收入。因此，虽然它可能在未来几个季度内无法盈利。但一旦其对技术和运营的投资提高了运营效率，这些高毛利率最终将转化为高利润率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Pardon the disruption</b></p><p><blockquote><b>抱歉打扰了</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com has more than 100,000 customers, up nearly 30% from the previous year. While this is a very competitive space,Bill.com is a disruptor, and there is a huge market opportunity. As my Foolish colleagues&nbsp;Jason Moser and Matthew Frankel&nbsp;pointed out in a recent podcast, there are 20 million small- and mid-sized businesses and an addressable market of $30 billion globally, including $9 billion in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com拥有超过10万名客户，比上年增长近30%。虽然这是一个竞争非常激烈的领域，但Bill.com是一个颠覆者，存在巨大的市场机会。正如我愚蠢的同事杰森·莫泽和马修·弗兰克尔在最近的播客中指出的那样，全球有2000万家中小企业和300亿美元的潜在市场，其中美国有90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But founder and CEO Rene Lacerte thinks of the&nbsp;fintech&nbsp;not just in terms of customers, but of the network of 2.5 million \"members,\" including the users and partners of all of its clients. \"We believe we are the leading digital B2B payments platform for SMBs (small and mid-sized businesses) and operate one of the largest B2B networks in the United States,\" Lacerte said on the&nbsp;most recent earnings call. That is a huge network of users on which to grow. The bigger the network, the more potential value it has for its members. Also, this growth allows Bill.com the opportunity to form deeper relationships with those on the network, offering additional products and services.</p><p><blockquote>但创始人兼首席执行官Rene Lacerte不仅从客户的角度看待金融科技，还从250万“会员”的角度看待金融科技，包括所有客户的用户和合作伙伴。Lacerte在最近的财报看涨期权上表示：“我们相信我们是SMB（中小型企业）领先的数字B2B支付平台，并运营着美国最大的B2B网络之一。”这是一个巨大的用户网络，可以在此基础上成长。网络越大，对其成员的潜在价值就越大。此外，这种增长使Bill.com有机会与网络上的人建立更深层次的关系，提供额外的产品和服务。</blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's other potential competitive advantage is its AI, which gets more intuitive and robust the more customers it gets and the more data it gathers. The better the AI, the more efficient, convenient and useful the service becomes.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com的另一个潜在竞争优势是其人工智能，它获得的客户越多，收集的数据越多，人工智能就会变得更加直观和强大。人工智能越好，服务就变得越高效、越方便、越有用。</blockquote></p><p> This is a young, disruptive company that's in growth mode, with a low-expense business model and high earnings potential, that will soon be profitable. If you are looking for a growth stock with long-term potential, this Cathie Wood stock -- one she has identified as a fintech innovator -- would not be a bad choice.</p><p><blockquote>这是一家年轻的、颠覆性的公司，正处于增长模式，具有低费用的商业模式和高盈利潜力，很快就会盈利。如果您正在寻找一只具有长期潜力的成长型股票，那么这只Cathie Wood股票（她将其视为金融科技创新者）将是一个不错的选择。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/09/is-billcom-the-cathie-wood-stock-for-you/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BILL":"BILL HOLDINGS INC","ARKW":"ARK Next Generation Internet ETF","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","ARKG":"ARK Genomic Revolution ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/09/is-billcom-the-cathie-wood-stock-for-you/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106014844","content_text":"This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.\nWhen Cathie Wood adds a stock or increases her positions in one of her portfolios, people pay attention. Wood is the founder and CEO of ARK Invest, a company that runs some of the top-performing exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Her actively managed ETFs -- including ARK Innovation,ARK Genomic Revolution, and ARK Next Generation Internet -- are mostly focused on technology stocks and have all posted huge returns over the past five years.\nAt the end of March, Wood increased her investment in a company called Bill.com(NYSE:BILL)in one of her portfolios,ARK Fintech Innovation. It caught our attention, so let's take a look at the stock to see if it's one you should consider buying.\nOn cloud nine\nBill.com's cloud-based platform simplifies billing, payment processing, accounting, and other back-office operations for small- and mid-sized business. The platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the invoicing and bill paying process -- essentially, it allows companies to automate these jobs, saving money on doing it in-house.\nSince the company went public in December 2019, its stock price has more than quadrupled, from $36 per share when it started trading to more than $157 at Thursday's close. It gained 171% in 2020 and is up more than 15% year to date in 2021.\nThe company makes money mostly on subscriptions its clients pay for the service, so it's a reliable, repeatable income stream that grows as it adds clients. The company also makes a far smaller percentage of revenue on interest earned holding funds for clients. In the fiscal second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, revenue spiked 38% year over year to $54 million, with $52.3 million coming from subscription and transaction fees.\nThe company is not yet profitable, posting a net loss of $17.2 million in the quarter, but it posted a huge gross margin of 75%, which is the revenue after subtracting the cost of producing the item being sold. So while it may not be profitable for a few more quarters. But once its investments in its technology and operations increase operating efficiency, those high gross margins will eventually translate into high profit margins.\nPardon the disruption\nBill.com has more than 100,000 customers, up nearly 30% from the previous year. While this is a very competitive space,Bill.com is a disruptor, and there is a huge market opportunity. As my Foolish colleagues Jason Moser and Matthew Frankel pointed out in a recent podcast, there are 20 million small- and mid-sized businesses and an addressable market of $30 billion globally, including $9 billion in the U.S.\nBut founder and CEO Rene Lacerte thinks of the fintech not just in terms of customers, but of the network of 2.5 million \"members,\" including the users and partners of all of its clients. \"We believe we are the leading digital B2B payments platform for SMBs (small and mid-sized businesses) and operate one of the largest B2B networks in the United States,\" Lacerte said on the most recent earnings call. That is a huge network of users on which to grow. The bigger the network, the more potential value it has for its members. Also, this growth allows Bill.com the opportunity to form deeper relationships with those on the network, offering additional products and services.\nBill.com's other potential competitive advantage is its AI, which gets more intuitive and robust the more customers it gets and the more data it gathers. The better the AI, the more efficient, convenient and useful the service becomes.\nThis is a young, disruptive company that's in growth mode, with a low-expense business model and high earnings potential, that will soon be profitable. If you are looking for a growth stock with long-term potential, this Cathie Wood stock -- one she has identified as a fintech innovator -- would not be a bad choice.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ARKG":0.9,"BILL":0.9,"ARKK":0.9,"ARKW":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1239,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":348457600,"gmtCreate":1617956608300,"gmtModify":1634295536615,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/348457600","repostId":"1108224926","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1329,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":341658234,"gmtCreate":1617810497828,"gmtModify":1634296360872,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/341658234","repostId":"2125872814","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1762,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349701674,"gmtCreate":1617635505598,"gmtModify":1634297395537,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/349701674","repostId":"2125765056","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1684,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349363302,"gmtCreate":1617545984706,"gmtModify":1634520576497,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/349363302","repostId":"1121666420","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121666420","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617365764,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121666420?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-02 20:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Has Given Up on These 3 Stocks, and That's a Huge Mistake<blockquote>华尔街放弃了这三只股票，这是一个巨大的错误</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121666420","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forval","content":"<p>It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forvalue stocksis pretty simple: Find financially robust companies that have performed poorly from a share price perspective, and buy them when they're down. When the share price comes back to reality, you'll be a winner. Wall Street has the habit of kicking a stock when it's down, as negative sentiment surrounding a particular name can spell doom for shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>现在是寻找纸面上盈利的遭受重创的股票的最佳时机。寻找价值股票非常简单：找到从股价角度来看表现不佳的财务稳健的公司，并在它们下跌时买入它们。当股价回到现实时，你将是赢家。华尔街有在股票下跌时踢掉股票的习惯，因为围绕某个特定名称的负面情绪可能会给股东带来厄运。</blockquote></p><p>For those seeking value, these moments present an opportunity. Here, we'll look at three value stocks that have seen better days, but also have a good chance at rebounding.</p><p><blockquote>对于那些寻求价值的人来说，这些时刻提供了一个机会。在这里，我们将关注三只价值股，它们经历了更好的日子，但也有很好的反弹机会。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gilead Sciences</b></p><p><blockquote><b>吉利德科学</b></blockquote></p><p>Over the past five years,<b>Gilead Sciences</b>(NASDAQ:GILD)has managed to lose about 40% of its value on the open market, and has vastly underperformed apassively held index fundover the same period (as shown below). As a market leader in the oncology, HIV, and hepatitis C drug markets, respectively, the company produces a suite of antivirals for typically hard-to-treat illnesses. While Gilead was -- and is -- front-and-center during the pandemic in its production of Veklury (more commonly known as remdesivir), it is not one of the major vaccine producers.</p><p><blockquote>五年来，<b>吉利德科学</b>（纳斯达克：GILD）在公开市场上损失了约40%的价值，并且同期的表现远远落后于被动持有的指数基金（如下所示）。作为肿瘤学、艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎药物市场的市场领导者，该公司生产一系列针对通常难以治疗的疾病的抗病毒药物。虽然吉利德在大流行期间一直是Veklury（通常称为remdesivir）生产的前沿和中心，但它并不是主要的疫苗生产商之一。</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps the better news for those considering a Gilead investment is that the company is fundamentally quite strong. It trades at 9 times earnings, which is comparably cheap across the large-cap biotech sector. It projects a strong 2021, releasing guidance for revenue of $25 billion and EPS in the $7 range .</p><p><blockquote>对于那些考虑投资吉利德的人来说，也许更好的消息是该公司从根本上来说相当强大。它的市盈率为9倍，在大型生物技术行业中相对便宜。它预计2021年将表现强劲，发布的收入指引为250亿美元，每股收益在7美元左右。</blockquote></p><p>Put simply, the company trades at an attractive price relative to the earnings it generates, and the hope is that patients start treatment for other viral and chronic (non-COVID) illnesses now that the pandemic has waned a bit in the early part of the year.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之，相对于其产生的收入，该公司的交易价格具有吸引力，希望患者能够开始治疗其他病毒性和慢性（非新冠）疾病，因为疫情在今年年初有所减弱。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e7203dcf348bdd13924f561f04db9af\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"435\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>DISH Network</b></p><p><blockquote><b>碟形网络</b></blockquote></p><p>Despite a stagnant stock price --<b>DISH Network</b>(NASDAQ:DISH)has fallen from just under $50 per share to around $35 today -- there is reason to believe a comeback is in the works. The stock currently trades at 11 times earnings, relatively cheap based on today's standards, and posted strong revenue growth in 2020, up about 40% from 2019.</p><p><blockquote>尽管股价停滞不前--<b>碟形网络</b>（纳斯达克：DISH）的股价已从每股略低于50美元跌至今天的35美元左右——有理由相信股价正在卷土重来。该股目前的市盈率为11倍，以今天的标准来看相对便宜，2020年收入增长强劲，较2019年增长约40%。</blockquote></p><p>DISH has engaged in a few creative partnerships; perhaps the most promising of the bunchis a pact with DraftKings, which seeks to offer sports betting from DISH set-top boxes. The underlying current here is that DISH Network has shown an ability to think outside the box, which is reflected in itsprofitability measures. It is a buy at its current price, and has an opportunity to stage a comeback in the coming years.</p><p><blockquote>DISH参与了一些创造性的合作；也许其中最有前途的是与DraftKings的协议，该协议旨在通过碟形机顶盒提供体育博彩。这里的潜在趋势是，DISH Network已经表现出了跳出框框思考的能力，这反映在其盈利能力指标上。以目前的价格买入，并有机会在未来几年卷土重来。</blockquote></p><p><b>Tupperware Brands</b></p><p><blockquote><b>特百惠品牌</b></blockquote></p><p>While not the most high-flying name you've ever heard,<b>Tupperware Brands</b>(NYSE:TUP)simply runs a sustainably profitable business. Last year's earnings were $2.24 a share, and the stock currently trades around $25 per share, leading to a current price-to-earnings ratio of only about 11. While overall sales were down in 2020, profitable sales growth rose, a sign that the company is still able to control costs and make money in the most difficult of circumstances.</p><p><blockquote>虽然不是你听过的最崇高的名字，<b>特百惠品牌</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TUP）只是经营一项可持续盈利的业务。去年的每股收益为2.24美元，该股目前的交易价格约为每股25美元，导致目前的市盈率仅为11左右。虽然2020年整体销售额下降，但盈利销售额增长上升，这表明该公司仍然能够在最困难的情况下控制成本并赚钱。</blockquote></p><p>The stock has also lost two-thirds of its value since 2013 but remains profitable. According to its year-end press release, the company has been successful in restructuring its debt and executing on its turnaround plans (especially concerning its core businesses). Shares remain cheap for the moment, but the fact remains: The company makes money and has the financials to prove it.</p><p><blockquote>自2013年以来，该股的价值也损失了三分之二，但仍保持盈利。根据其年终新闻稿，该公司已成功重组债务并执行扭亏为盈计划（特别是有关其核心业务）。目前股价仍然便宜，但事实仍然是：该公司赚钱，并且有财务数据证明这一点。</blockquote></p><p><b>When in doubt, seek value</b></p><p><blockquote><b>当有疑问时，寻求价值</b></blockquote></p><p>The basic premise of value investing is to find profitable companies that happen to be on sale in the open market. While single-stock investing is far from a guaranteed strategy, it's worth looking into seemingly \"forgotten\" companies that simply have not yet had their day in the sun. Companies that have demonstrated their ability to grow and sustain profitability are your best bet, especially when they're cheap.</p><p><blockquote>价值投资的基本前提是找到盈利的公司，而这些公司恰好在公开市场上出售。虽然单一股票投资远非一种有保证的策略，但值得关注那些看似“被遗忘”的公司，这些公司只是还没有成功。已经证明有能力增长和维持盈利能力的公司是你最好的选择，尤其是当它们很便宜的时候。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Has Given Up on These 3 Stocks, and That's a Huge Mistake<blockquote>华尔街放弃了这三只股票，这是一个巨大的错误</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Has Given Up on These 3 Stocks, and That's a Huge Mistake<blockquote>华尔街放弃了这三只股票，这是一个巨大的错误</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-02 20:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forvalue stocksis pretty simple: Find financially robust companies that have performed poorly from a share price perspective, and buy them when they're down. When the share price comes back to reality, you'll be a winner. Wall Street has the habit of kicking a stock when it's down, as negative sentiment surrounding a particular name can spell doom for shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>现在是寻找纸面上盈利的遭受重创的股票的最佳时机。寻找价值股票非常简单：找到从股价角度来看表现不佳的财务稳健的公司，并在它们下跌时买入它们。当股价回到现实时，你将是赢家。华尔街有在股票下跌时踢掉股票的习惯，因为围绕某个特定名称的负面情绪可能会给股东带来厄运。</blockquote></p><p>For those seeking value, these moments present an opportunity. Here, we'll look at three value stocks that have seen better days, but also have a good chance at rebounding.</p><p><blockquote>对于那些寻求价值的人来说，这些时刻提供了一个机会。在这里，我们将关注三只价值股，它们经历了更好的日子，但也有很好的反弹机会。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gilead Sciences</b></p><p><blockquote><b>吉利德科学</b></blockquote></p><p>Over the past five years,<b>Gilead Sciences</b>(NASDAQ:GILD)has managed to lose about 40% of its value on the open market, and has vastly underperformed apassively held index fundover the same period (as shown below). As a market leader in the oncology, HIV, and hepatitis C drug markets, respectively, the company produces a suite of antivirals for typically hard-to-treat illnesses. While Gilead was -- and is -- front-and-center during the pandemic in its production of Veklury (more commonly known as remdesivir), it is not one of the major vaccine producers.</p><p><blockquote>五年来，<b>吉利德科学</b>（纳斯达克：GILD）在公开市场上损失了约40%的价值，并且同期的表现远远落后于被动持有的指数基金（如下所示）。作为肿瘤学、艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎药物市场的市场领导者，该公司生产一系列针对通常难以治疗的疾病的抗病毒药物。虽然吉利德在大流行期间一直是Veklury（通常称为remdesivir）生产的前沿和中心，但它并不是主要的疫苗生产商之一。</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps the better news for those considering a Gilead investment is that the company is fundamentally quite strong. It trades at 9 times earnings, which is comparably cheap across the large-cap biotech sector. It projects a strong 2021, releasing guidance for revenue of $25 billion and EPS in the $7 range .</p><p><blockquote>对于那些考虑投资吉利德的人来说，也许更好的消息是该公司从根本上来说相当强大。它的市盈率为9倍，在大型生物技术行业中相对便宜。它预计2021年将表现强劲，发布的收入指引为250亿美元，每股收益在7美元左右。</blockquote></p><p>Put simply, the company trades at an attractive price relative to the earnings it generates, and the hope is that patients start treatment for other viral and chronic (non-COVID) illnesses now that the pandemic has waned a bit in the early part of the year.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之，相对于其产生的收入，该公司的交易价格具有吸引力，希望患者能够开始治疗其他病毒性和慢性（非新冠）疾病，因为疫情在今年年初有所减弱。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e7203dcf348bdd13924f561f04db9af\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"435\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>DISH Network</b></p><p><blockquote><b>碟形网络</b></blockquote></p><p>Despite a stagnant stock price --<b>DISH Network</b>(NASDAQ:DISH)has fallen from just under $50 per share to around $35 today -- there is reason to believe a comeback is in the works. The stock currently trades at 11 times earnings, relatively cheap based on today's standards, and posted strong revenue growth in 2020, up about 40% from 2019.</p><p><blockquote>尽管股价停滞不前--<b>碟形网络</b>（纳斯达克：DISH）的股价已从每股略低于50美元跌至今天的35美元左右——有理由相信股价正在卷土重来。该股目前的市盈率为11倍，以今天的标准来看相对便宜，2020年收入增长强劲，较2019年增长约40%。</blockquote></p><p>DISH has engaged in a few creative partnerships; perhaps the most promising of the bunchis a pact with DraftKings, which seeks to offer sports betting from DISH set-top boxes. The underlying current here is that DISH Network has shown an ability to think outside the box, which is reflected in itsprofitability measures. It is a buy at its current price, and has an opportunity to stage a comeback in the coming years.</p><p><blockquote>DISH参与了一些创造性的合作；也许其中最有前途的是与DraftKings的协议，该协议旨在通过碟形机顶盒提供体育博彩。这里的潜在趋势是，DISH Network已经表现出了跳出框框思考的能力，这反映在其盈利能力指标上。以目前的价格买入，并有机会在未来几年卷土重来。</blockquote></p><p><b>Tupperware Brands</b></p><p><blockquote><b>特百惠品牌</b></blockquote></p><p>While not the most high-flying name you've ever heard,<b>Tupperware Brands</b>(NYSE:TUP)simply runs a sustainably profitable business. Last year's earnings were $2.24 a share, and the stock currently trades around $25 per share, leading to a current price-to-earnings ratio of only about 11. While overall sales were down in 2020, profitable sales growth rose, a sign that the company is still able to control costs and make money in the most difficult of circumstances.</p><p><blockquote>虽然不是你听过的最崇高的名字，<b>特百惠品牌</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TUP）只是经营一项可持续盈利的业务。去年的每股收益为2.24美元，该股目前的交易价格约为每股25美元，导致目前的市盈率仅为11左右。虽然2020年整体销售额下降，但盈利销售额增长上升，这表明该公司仍然能够在最困难的情况下控制成本并赚钱。</blockquote></p><p>The stock has also lost two-thirds of its value since 2013 but remains profitable. According to its year-end press release, the company has been successful in restructuring its debt and executing on its turnaround plans (especially concerning its core businesses). Shares remain cheap for the moment, but the fact remains: The company makes money and has the financials to prove it.</p><p><blockquote>自2013年以来，该股的价值也损失了三分之二，但仍保持盈利。根据其年终新闻稿，该公司已成功重组债务并执行扭亏为盈计划（特别是有关其核心业务）。目前股价仍然便宜，但事实仍然是：该公司赚钱，并且有财务数据证明这一点。</blockquote></p><p><b>When in doubt, seek value</b></p><p><blockquote><b>当有疑问时，寻求价值</b></blockquote></p><p>The basic premise of value investing is to find profitable companies that happen to be on sale in the open market. While single-stock investing is far from a guaranteed strategy, it's worth looking into seemingly \"forgotten\" companies that simply have not yet had their day in the sun. Companies that have demonstrated their ability to grow and sustain profitability are your best bet, especially when they're cheap.</p><p><blockquote>价值投资的基本前提是找到盈利的公司，而这些公司恰好在公开市场上出售。虽然单一股票投资远非一种有保证的策略，但值得关注那些看似“被遗忘”的公司，这些公司只是还没有成功。已经证明有能力增长和维持盈利能力的公司是你最好的选择，尤其是当它们很便宜的时候。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/02/wall-street-has-given-up-on-these-3-stocks-and-tha/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GILD":"吉利德科学","DISH":"Dish Network"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/02/wall-street-has-given-up-on-these-3-stocks-and-tha/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121666420","content_text":"It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forvalue stocksis pretty simple: Find financially robust companies that have performed poorly from a share price perspective, and buy them when they're down. When the share price comes back to reality, you'll be a winner. Wall Street has the habit of kicking a stock when it's down, as negative sentiment surrounding a particular name can spell doom for shareholders.For those seeking value, these moments present an opportunity. Here, we'll look at three value stocks that have seen better days, but also have a good chance at rebounding.Gilead SciencesOver the past five years,Gilead Sciences(NASDAQ:GILD)has managed to lose about 40% of its value on the open market, and has vastly underperformed apassively held index fundover the same period (as shown below). As a market leader in the oncology, HIV, and hepatitis C drug markets, respectively, the company produces a suite of antivirals for typically hard-to-treat illnesses. While Gilead was -- and is -- front-and-center during the pandemic in its production of Veklury (more commonly known as remdesivir), it is not one of the major vaccine producers.Perhaps the better news for those considering a Gilead investment is that the company is fundamentally quite strong. It trades at 9 times earnings, which is comparably cheap across the large-cap biotech sector. It projects a strong 2021, releasing guidance for revenue of $25 billion and EPS in the $7 range .Put simply, the company trades at an attractive price relative to the earnings it generates, and the hope is that patients start treatment for other viral and chronic (non-COVID) illnesses now that the pandemic has waned a bit in the early part of the year.DISH NetworkDespite a stagnant stock price --DISH Network(NASDAQ:DISH)has fallen from just under $50 per share to around $35 today -- there is reason to believe a comeback is in the works. The stock currently trades at 11 times earnings, relatively cheap based on today's standards, and posted strong revenue growth in 2020, up about 40% from 2019.DISH has engaged in a few creative partnerships; perhaps the most promising of the bunchis a pact with DraftKings, which seeks to offer sports betting from DISH set-top boxes. The underlying current here is that DISH Network has shown an ability to think outside the box, which is reflected in itsprofitability measures. It is a buy at its current price, and has an opportunity to stage a comeback in the coming years.Tupperware BrandsWhile not the most high-flying name you've ever heard,Tupperware Brands(NYSE:TUP)simply runs a sustainably profitable business. Last year's earnings were $2.24 a share, and the stock currently trades around $25 per share, leading to a current price-to-earnings ratio of only about 11. While overall sales were down in 2020, profitable sales growth rose, a sign that the company is still able to control costs and make money in the most difficult of circumstances.The stock has also lost two-thirds of its value since 2013 but remains profitable. According to its year-end press release, the company has been successful in restructuring its debt and executing on its turnaround plans (especially concerning its core businesses). Shares remain cheap for the moment, but the fact remains: The company makes money and has the financials to prove it.When in doubt, seek valueThe basic premise of value investing is to find profitable companies that happen to be on sale in the open market. While single-stock investing is far from a guaranteed strategy, it's worth looking into seemingly \"forgotten\" companies that simply have not yet had their day in the sun. Companies that have demonstrated their ability to grow and sustain profitability are your best bet, especially when they're cheap.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DISH":0.9,"GILD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1610,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340450298,"gmtCreate":1617459400014,"gmtModify":1634520879342,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340450298","repostId":"2124875875","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340948488,"gmtCreate":1617333935344,"gmtModify":1634521361612,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340948488","repostId":"1102765777","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2505,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355764836,"gmtCreate":1617107451525,"gmtModify":1634522634794,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355764836","repostId":"2123296931","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1739,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355955286,"gmtCreate":1617025851245,"gmtModify":1634523066033,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355955286","repostId":"1193371328","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193371328","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617024119,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1193371328?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-29 21:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"CFDs - The Dirty Little Secret Behind The Collapse Of Archegos<blockquote>差价合约——Archegos倒闭背后的肮脏小秘密</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193371328","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Stop us if you've heard this one before -Wall Street prime brokers allowed hedge funds to dance whil","content":"<p>Stop us if you've heard this one before -<i>Wall Street prime brokers allowed hedge funds to dance while the music was playing with ever greater leverage in off-exchange and unregulated derivatives... until the first sign of trouble and the whole house of cards comes crashing down in a potentially systemic manner</i>.</p><p><blockquote>如果你以前听过这个，请阻止我们-<i>华尔街大宗经纪商允许对冲基金在场外和不受监管的衍生品杠杆越来越大的同时跳舞...直到出现麻烦的第一个迹象，整个纸牌屋以潜在的系统性方式崩溃</i>.</blockquote></p><p> The bloodbath in various media stocks on Friday has brought light back to one of the dark corners of the equity trading business -<b>so-called contracts-for-differences (CFDs).</b></p><p><blockquote>周五各家媒体股的血洗让股票交易业务的黑暗角落之一重见光明——<b>所谓的差价合约（CFD）。</b></blockquote></p><p> As Bloomberg reports, much of the leverage used by Hwang’s&nbsp;Archegos Capital was provided by banks including&nbsp;Nomura and&nbsp;Credit Suisse -who have most recently admitted huge losses- as<b>CFDs, which are made off exchanges, allow managers like Hwang to amass stakes in publicly traded companies without having to declare their holdings</b>(far in excess of the 5% stakes that require regulatory reporting).</p><p><blockquote>据彭博社报道，Hwang的Archegos Capital使用的大部分杠杆是由野村证券和瑞士信贷等银行提供的——这些银行最近承认遭受了巨大损失——因为<b>在交易所进行的差价合约允许像Hwang这样的经理人积累上市公司的股份，而不必申报他们持有的股份</b>（远远超过需要监管报告的5%股份）。</blockquote></p><p> Crucially,as Bloomberg notes,this means<b>Archegos may never actually have owned most of the underlying securities - if any at all</b>- as the CFD is akin to a privately-arranged (i.e. off exchange and bespoke) futures contract where the differences in the settlement between the open and closing trade prices are cash-settled (there is no delivery of physical goods or securities with CFDs).</p><p><blockquote>至关重要的是，正如彭博社指出的那样，这意味着<b>Archegos可能从未真正拥有大部分基础证券（如果有的话）</b>-由于差价合约类似于私人安排（即场外及定制）期货合约，其中开盘价与收盘价之间的结算差额以现金结算（差价合约并无交付实物商品或证券）。</blockquote></p><p> What makes the situation worse is that<b>Archegos reportedly took positions in these CFDs with various prime brokers</b>- and because these positions are by their nature not centrally cleared or aggregated, this left prime broker X unaware of their client's exposures with prime broker Y... which in this case was huge.</p><p><blockquote>更糟糕的是<b>据报道，Archegos在多家主要经纪商处持有这些差价合约头寸</b>-由于这些头寸本质上不是集中清算或汇总的，这使得主经纪商X不知道他们的客户在主经纪商Y的风险敞口...在这种情况下，这是巨大的。</blockquote></p><p> The leverage Hwang was given made him look like a trading genius as the various positions he took were pumped and pumped (and helped by gamma-squeezers) but now look like a reckless gambling fool as the bets collapsed.</p><p><blockquote>黄禹锡获得的杠杆让他看起来像一个交易天才，因为他持有的各种头寸被抽了又抽（并得到了伽马挤压者的帮助），但现在随着赌注的崩溃，他看起来像一个鲁莽的赌博傻瓜。</blockquote></p><p> CFDs linked to stocks (with a gross market value of around $282 billion at end June 2020) are among bespoke derivatives that investors trade privately between themselves, or over-the-counter, instead of through public exchanges.<b>This is exactly the kind of hidden risk that amplified the losses during the 2008 financial crisis.</b></p><p><blockquote>与股票挂钩的差价合约（截至2020年6月底总市值约为2820亿美元）是定制衍生品之一，投资者可以私下交易，或在场外交易，而不是通过公共交易所。<b>这正是2008年金融危机时放大损失的那种隐性风险。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffab65c57ee35df93f6a6087e1136e5b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"321\">AsBloombergnotes,<b>regulators have begun clamping down on CFDs in recent years because they’re concerned the derivatives are too complex and too risky for retail investors,</b>with the European Securities and Markets Authority in 2018&nbsp;restricting&nbsp;the distribution to individuals and capping leverage. In the U.S., CFDs are largely banned for amateur traders... but not for hedge fund managers who are \"sophisticated\"?</p><p><blockquote>正如彭博社指出的那样，<b>监管机构近年来开始打击差价合约，因为他们担心衍生品对散户投资者来说过于复杂且风险太大，</b>欧洲证券和市场管理局在2018年限制了对个人的分配并限制了杠杆。在美国，业余交易者基本上禁止差价合约...但对于“老练”的对冲基金经理来说就不是了？</blockquote></p><p> But,<b>banks still favor them because they can make a large profit without needing to set aside as much capital versus trading actual securities</b>(driven to this opaque market as an unintended consequence of heavy regulation following the 2008 financial crisis).</p><p><blockquote>但是，<b>银行仍然青睐它们，因为与交易实际证券相比，它们无需留出那么多资本即可赚取巨额利润</b>（2008年金融危机后严格监管的意外后果导致了这个不透明的市场）。</blockquote></p><p> In the case of Archegos, there is very little transparency about Hwang’s trades, but market participants suggest his assets had grown to anywhere from $5 billion to $10 billion in recent years with<b>total exposure topping $50 billion</b>. And bear in mind,<b>this is not 'leverage' in the old-fashioned sense</b>(i.e. banks allow you buy X-times the amount of stocks relative to your capital); this is<b>purely synthetic</b>- the firm has no actual underlying asset to fall back on, but is linearly exposed to losses (and gains) on a margined basis.</p><p><blockquote>就Archegos而言，Hwang的交易透明度很低，但市场参与者表示，近年来他的资产已增长至50亿至100亿美元。<b>总风险敞口超过500亿美元</b>.记住，<b>这不是传统意义上的“杠杆”</b>（即银行允许你购买相对于你资本数量X倍的股票）；这是<b>纯合成的</b>-公司没有实际的基础资产可以依靠，但在边际基础上线性面临损失（和收益）。</blockquote></p><p> And as we noted at the beginning,<b>this has the potential to be much more systemic</b>as the losses created by Archegos' margin calls trigger more margin calls and more potential losses for the prime brokers. Think we are exaggerating, then explain why the costs of counterparty risk hedging for Credit Suisse for example, has exploded in the last few days...</p><p><blockquote>正如我们在开头提到的，<b>这有可能更加系统化</b>由于Archegos的保证金评级造成的损失引发了更多的保证金评级以及大宗经纪商的更多潜在损失。认为我们夸大其词，然后解释为什么瑞士信贷的交易对手风险对冲成本在过去几天激增...</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28842de72b88aa4010edfcfa798fa5af\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"273\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p><p><blockquote><i>资料来源：彭博社</i></blockquote></p><p> Mohammed El-Erian told CNBC this morning that<i><b>\"It seems to be a one-off ... for now, it looks contained. And that's a good thing.\" But added \"what we don't want is a pile-up.\"</b></i></p><p><blockquote>穆罕默德·埃里安今天早上告诉CNBC<i><b>“这似乎是一次性的……就目前而言，它看起来得到了控制。这是一件好事。”但补充说“我们不想要的是连环相撞。”</b></i></blockquote></p><p> We look forward to the Congressional hearings on this.</p><p><blockquote>我们期待国会就此举行听证会。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>CFDs - The Dirty Little Secret Behind The Collapse Of Archegos<blockquote>差价合约——Archegos倒闭背后的肮脏小秘密</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCFDs - The Dirty Little Secret Behind The Collapse Of Archegos<blockquote>差价合约——Archegos倒闭背后的肮脏小秘密</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-29 21:21</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stop us if you've heard this one before -<i>Wall Street prime brokers allowed hedge funds to dance while the music was playing with ever greater leverage in off-exchange and unregulated derivatives... until the first sign of trouble and the whole house of cards comes crashing down in a potentially systemic manner</i>.</p><p><blockquote>如果你以前听过这个，请阻止我们-<i>华尔街大宗经纪商允许对冲基金在场外和不受监管的衍生品杠杆越来越大的同时跳舞...直到出现麻烦的第一个迹象，整个纸牌屋以潜在的系统性方式崩溃</i>.</blockquote></p><p> The bloodbath in various media stocks on Friday has brought light back to one of the dark corners of the equity trading business -<b>so-called contracts-for-differences (CFDs).</b></p><p><blockquote>周五各家媒体股的血洗让股票交易业务的黑暗角落之一重见光明——<b>所谓的差价合约（CFD）。</b></blockquote></p><p> As Bloomberg reports, much of the leverage used by Hwang’s&nbsp;Archegos Capital was provided by banks including&nbsp;Nomura and&nbsp;Credit Suisse -who have most recently admitted huge losses- as<b>CFDs, which are made off exchanges, allow managers like Hwang to amass stakes in publicly traded companies without having to declare their holdings</b>(far in excess of the 5% stakes that require regulatory reporting).</p><p><blockquote>据彭博社报道，Hwang的Archegos Capital使用的大部分杠杆是由野村证券和瑞士信贷等银行提供的——这些银行最近承认遭受了巨大损失——因为<b>在交易所进行的差价合约允许像Hwang这样的经理人积累上市公司的股份，而不必申报他们持有的股份</b>（远远超过需要监管报告的5%股份）。</blockquote></p><p> Crucially,as Bloomberg notes,this means<b>Archegos may never actually have owned most of the underlying securities - if any at all</b>- as the CFD is akin to a privately-arranged (i.e. off exchange and bespoke) futures contract where the differences in the settlement between the open and closing trade prices are cash-settled (there is no delivery of physical goods or securities with CFDs).</p><p><blockquote>至关重要的是，正如彭博社指出的那样，这意味着<b>Archegos可能从未真正拥有大部分基础证券（如果有的话）</b>-由于差价合约类似于私人安排（即场外及定制）期货合约，其中开盘价与收盘价之间的结算差额以现金结算（差价合约并无交付实物商品或证券）。</blockquote></p><p> What makes the situation worse is that<b>Archegos reportedly took positions in these CFDs with various prime brokers</b>- and because these positions are by their nature not centrally cleared or aggregated, this left prime broker X unaware of their client's exposures with prime broker Y... which in this case was huge.</p><p><blockquote>更糟糕的是<b>据报道，Archegos在多家主要经纪商处持有这些差价合约头寸</b>-由于这些头寸本质上不是集中清算或汇总的，这使得主经纪商X不知道他们的客户在主经纪商Y的风险敞口...在这种情况下，这是巨大的。</blockquote></p><p> The leverage Hwang was given made him look like a trading genius as the various positions he took were pumped and pumped (and helped by gamma-squeezers) but now look like a reckless gambling fool as the bets collapsed.</p><p><blockquote>黄禹锡获得的杠杆让他看起来像一个交易天才，因为他持有的各种头寸被抽了又抽（并得到了伽马挤压者的帮助），但现在随着赌注的崩溃，他看起来像一个鲁莽的赌博傻瓜。</blockquote></p><p> CFDs linked to stocks (with a gross market value of around $282 billion at end June 2020) are among bespoke derivatives that investors trade privately between themselves, or over-the-counter, instead of through public exchanges.<b>This is exactly the kind of hidden risk that amplified the losses during the 2008 financial crisis.</b></p><p><blockquote>与股票挂钩的差价合约（截至2020年6月底总市值约为2820亿美元）是定制衍生品之一，投资者可以私下交易，或在场外交易，而不是通过公共交易所。<b>这正是2008年金融危机时放大损失的那种隐性风险。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffab65c57ee35df93f6a6087e1136e5b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"321\">AsBloombergnotes,<b>regulators have begun clamping down on CFDs in recent years because they’re concerned the derivatives are too complex and too risky for retail investors,</b>with the European Securities and Markets Authority in 2018&nbsp;restricting&nbsp;the distribution to individuals and capping leverage. In the U.S., CFDs are largely banned for amateur traders... but not for hedge fund managers who are \"sophisticated\"?</p><p><blockquote>正如彭博社指出的那样，<b>监管机构近年来开始打击差价合约，因为他们担心衍生品对散户投资者来说过于复杂且风险太大，</b>欧洲证券和市场管理局在2018年限制了对个人的分配并限制了杠杆。在美国，业余交易者基本上禁止差价合约...但对于“老练”的对冲基金经理来说就不是了？</blockquote></p><p> But,<b>banks still favor them because they can make a large profit without needing to set aside as much capital versus trading actual securities</b>(driven to this opaque market as an unintended consequence of heavy regulation following the 2008 financial crisis).</p><p><blockquote>但是，<b>银行仍然青睐它们，因为与交易实际证券相比，它们无需留出那么多资本即可赚取巨额利润</b>（2008年金融危机后严格监管的意外后果导致了这个不透明的市场）。</blockquote></p><p> In the case of Archegos, there is very little transparency about Hwang’s trades, but market participants suggest his assets had grown to anywhere from $5 billion to $10 billion in recent years with<b>total exposure topping $50 billion</b>. And bear in mind,<b>this is not 'leverage' in the old-fashioned sense</b>(i.e. banks allow you buy X-times the amount of stocks relative to your capital); this is<b>purely synthetic</b>- the firm has no actual underlying asset to fall back on, but is linearly exposed to losses (and gains) on a margined basis.</p><p><blockquote>就Archegos而言，Hwang的交易透明度很低，但市场参与者表示，近年来他的资产已增长至50亿至100亿美元。<b>总风险敞口超过500亿美元</b>.记住，<b>这不是传统意义上的“杠杆”</b>（即银行允许你购买相对于你资本数量X倍的股票）；这是<b>纯合成的</b>-公司没有实际的基础资产可以依靠，但在边际基础上线性面临损失（和收益）。</blockquote></p><p> And as we noted at the beginning,<b>this has the potential to be much more systemic</b>as the losses created by Archegos' margin calls trigger more margin calls and more potential losses for the prime brokers. Think we are exaggerating, then explain why the costs of counterparty risk hedging for Credit Suisse for example, has exploded in the last few days...</p><p><blockquote>正如我们在开头提到的，<b>这有可能更加系统化</b>由于Archegos的保证金评级造成的损失引发了更多的保证金评级以及大宗经纪商的更多潜在损失。认为我们夸大其词，然后解释为什么瑞士信贷的交易对手风险对冲成本在过去几天激增...</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28842de72b88aa4010edfcfa798fa5af\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"273\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p><p><blockquote><i>资料来源：彭博社</i></blockquote></p><p> Mohammed El-Erian told CNBC this morning that<i><b>\"It seems to be a one-off ... for now, it looks contained. And that's a good thing.\" But added \"what we don't want is a pile-up.\"</b></i></p><p><blockquote>穆罕默德·埃里安今天早上告诉CNBC<i><b>“这似乎是一次性的……就目前而言，它看起来得到了控制。这是一件好事。”但补充说“我们不想要的是连环相撞。”</b></i></blockquote></p><p> We look forward to the Congressional hearings on this.</p><p><blockquote>我们期待国会就此举行听证会。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cfds-dirty-little-secret-behind-collapse-archegos?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cfds-dirty-little-secret-behind-collapse-archegos?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193371328","content_text":"Stop us if you've heard this one before -Wall Street prime brokers allowed hedge funds to dance while the music was playing with ever greater leverage in off-exchange and unregulated derivatives... until the first sign of trouble and the whole house of cards comes crashing down in a potentially systemic manner.\nThe bloodbath in various media stocks on Friday has brought light back to one of the dark corners of the equity trading business -so-called contracts-for-differences (CFDs).\nAs Bloomberg reports, much of the leverage used by Hwang’s Archegos Capital was provided by banks including Nomura and Credit Suisse -who have most recently admitted huge losses- asCFDs, which are made off exchanges, allow managers like Hwang to amass stakes in publicly traded companies without having to declare their holdings(far in excess of the 5% stakes that require regulatory reporting).\nCrucially,as Bloomberg notes,this meansArchegos may never actually have owned most of the underlying securities - if any at all- as the CFD is akin to a privately-arranged (i.e. off exchange and bespoke) futures contract where the differences in the settlement between the open and closing trade prices are cash-settled (there is no delivery of physical goods or securities with CFDs).\nWhat makes the situation worse is thatArchegos reportedly took positions in these CFDs with various prime brokers- and because these positions are by their nature not centrally cleared or aggregated, this left prime broker X unaware of their client's exposures with prime broker Y... which in this case was huge.\nThe leverage Hwang was given made him look like a trading genius as the various positions he took were pumped and pumped (and helped by gamma-squeezers) but now look like a reckless gambling fool as the bets collapsed.\nCFDs linked to stocks (with a gross market value of around $282 billion at end June 2020) are among bespoke derivatives that investors trade privately between themselves, or over-the-counter, instead of through public exchanges.This is exactly the kind of hidden risk that amplified the losses during the 2008 financial crisis.\nAsBloombergnotes,regulators have begun clamping down on CFDs in recent years because they’re concerned the derivatives are too complex and too risky for retail investors,with the European Securities and Markets Authority in 2018 restricting the distribution to individuals and capping leverage. In the U.S., CFDs are largely banned for amateur traders... but not for hedge fund managers who are \"sophisticated\"?\nBut,banks still favor them because they can make a large profit without needing to set aside as much capital versus trading actual securities(driven to this opaque market as an unintended consequence of heavy regulation following the 2008 financial crisis).\nIn the case of Archegos, there is very little transparency about Hwang’s trades, but market participants suggest his assets had grown to anywhere from $5 billion to $10 billion in recent years withtotal exposure topping $50 billion. And bear in mind,this is not 'leverage' in the old-fashioned sense(i.e. banks allow you buy X-times the amount of stocks relative to your capital); this ispurely synthetic- the firm has no actual underlying asset to fall back on, but is linearly exposed to losses (and gains) on a margined basis.\nAnd as we noted at the beginning,this has the potential to be much more systemicas the losses created by Archegos' margin calls trigger more margin calls and more potential losses for the prime brokers. Think we are exaggerating, then explain why the costs of counterparty risk hedging for Credit Suisse for example, has exploded in the last few days...\nSource: Bloomberg\nMohammed El-Erian told CNBC this morning that\"It seems to be a one-off ... for now, it looks contained. And that's a good thing.\" But added \"what we don't want is a pile-up.\"\nWe look forward to the Congressional hearings on this.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1475,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355955043,"gmtCreate":1617025834382,"gmtModify":1634523066277,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355955043","repostId":"1155390932","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351272423,"gmtCreate":1616600362562,"gmtModify":1634524967711,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351272423","repostId":"351176738","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":351176738,"gmtCreate":1616579786124,"gmtModify":1631884797304,"author":{"id":"3569530406935035","authorId":"3569530406935035","name":"Jinkachu","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a47cb60ff4f5df9c8eac85aa6198baa0","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569530406935035","idStr":"3569530406935035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATOS\">$Atossa Genetics(ATOS)$</a>gg wp what happen&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATOS\">$Atossa Genetics(ATOS)$</a>gg wp what happen&nbsp;","text":"$Atossa Genetics(ATOS)$gg wp what happen","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c417cbb5401dc6d97aa3ecfcfddc8d47","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351176738","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":603,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351272328,"gmtCreate":1616600338864,"gmtModify":1634524967953,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351272328","repostId":"2121457670","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":814,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359779069,"gmtCreate":1616426468651,"gmtModify":1634525863800,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359779069","repostId":"1115438167","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115438167","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1616423750,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1115438167?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-22 22:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Some “meme” stocks are slipping<blockquote>一些“模因”股票正在下滑</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115438167","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some “meme” stocks are slipping in Monday trading,AMC Entertainment stock fall 13%,the shares of Sundial Growers drop 7%,GameStop Corp. stock is down 2%.These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days ","content":"<p>Some&nbsp;“meme”&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;are&nbsp;slipping&nbsp;in&nbsp;Monday&nbsp;trading,AMC&nbsp;Entertainment&nbsp;stock&nbsp;fall&nbsp;13%,the&nbsp;shares&nbsp;of&nbsp;Sundial&nbsp;Growers&nbsp;drop&nbsp;7%,GameStop&nbsp;Corp.&nbsp;stock&nbsp;is&nbsp;down&nbsp;2%.</p><p><blockquote>一些“模因”股票在周一交易中下跌，AMC Entertainment股票下跌13%，Sundial Growers股票下跌7%，游戏驿站公司股票下跌2%。</blockquote></p><p>These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks.</p><p><blockquote>使用迈阿密大学的Alok Kumar、岘港大学的Houng Nguyen以及悉尼科技大学和斯德哥尔摩经济学院的Talis Putnins最近发表的研究论文中的方法，这些股票被确定为潜在的赌博。该小组建议将30天内的平均交易量与市值进行比较，以此来确定他们所谓的彩票股票。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de78ffef1bc7540f75fca0332d31e69c\" tg-width=\"371\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Some “meme” stocks are slipping<blockquote>一些“模因”股票正在下滑</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSome “meme” stocks are slipping<blockquote>一些“模因”股票正在下滑</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-03-22 22:35</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some&nbsp;“meme”&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;are&nbsp;slipping&nbsp;in&nbsp;Monday&nbsp;trading,AMC&nbsp;Entertainment&nbsp;stock&nbsp;fall&nbsp;13%,the&nbsp;shares&nbsp;of&nbsp;Sundial&nbsp;Growers&nbsp;drop&nbsp;7%,GameStop&nbsp;Corp.&nbsp;stock&nbsp;is&nbsp;down&nbsp;2%.</p><p><blockquote>一些“模因”股票在周一交易中下跌，AMC Entertainment股票下跌13%，Sundial Growers股票下跌7%，游戏驿站公司股票下跌2%。</blockquote></p><p>These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks.</p><p><blockquote>使用迈阿密大学的Alok Kumar、岘港大学的Houng Nguyen以及悉尼科技大学和斯德哥尔摩经济学院的Talis Putnins最近发表的研究论文中的方法，这些股票被确定为潜在的赌博。该小组建议将30天内的平均交易量与市值进行比较，以此来确定他们所谓的彩票股票。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de78ffef1bc7540f75fca0332d31e69c\" tg-width=\"371\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站","SNDL":"SNDL Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115438167","content_text":"Some “meme” stocks are slipping in Monday trading,AMC Entertainment stock fall 13%,the shares of Sundial Growers drop 7%,GameStop Corp. stock is down 2%.These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NAKD":0.9,"AMC":0.9,"GME":0.9,"SNDL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":577,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359306978,"gmtCreate":1616335248094,"gmtModify":1634526310417,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359306978","repostId":"1199154789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199154789","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616164372,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199154789?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-19 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让SLR救助到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199154789","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio  exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on ","content":"<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><p><blockquote>正如本文所暗示和深入讨论的那样，在伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)和谢罗德·布朗(Sherrod Brown)等进步民主党人的政治压力下，美联储决定让临时补充杠杆率(SLR)豁免如期于3月31日（规则变更一周年）到期。</blockquote></p><p>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p><blockquote>联邦银行监管机构今天宣布，2020年5月15日发布的存款机构补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变更将于2021年3月31日如期到期。鉴于新冠肺炎事件，这一临时变化是为了为存款机构向家庭和企业提供信贷提供灵活性。这一结果是前纽约联储大师Zoltan Pozsar（再次）正确预测的结果，他跟随FOMC表示，“事实上，美联储实际上是先发制人地做出了这一调整——目前没有使用o/n RRP工具，因此没有能力限制，而回购和票据收益率尚未为负——<b>暗示美联储正在为SLR豁免的结束“铺路”</b>.\"</blockquote></p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><p><blockquote>美联储深知这将是市场的一个非常热门的问题，因此发表了以下声明以缓解交易员的紧张情绪，并指出，虽然SLR特殊待遇将于3月31日到期，但美联储正在“邀请公众就几项潜在的SLR修改发表评论”。此外，”<b>随着时间的推移，董事会可能需要解决SLR当前的设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力</b>”——简而言之，如果收益率飙升，美联储将立即重新引入SLR：</blockquote></p><p>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储周五宣布，银行控股公司补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变化将于3月31日如期到期。<b>此外，董事会将很快就调整SLR的措施征求意见。董事会将采取适当行动，确保SLR的任何变化不会削弱银行资本要求的整体实力。</b>为了缓解COVID-19大流行造成的国债市场压力并促进对家庭和企业的贷款，董事会去年暂时修改了SLR，将美国国债和央行储备排除在外。从那时起，国债市场已经稳定下来。<b>然而，由于最近中央银行储备供应和国债发行的增长，理事会可能需要随着时间的推移解决SLR的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力。为了确保SLR（2014年作为额外资本要求而设立）在准备金较高的环境下保持有效，董事会将很快就几项潜在的SLR修改征求公众意见。</b>该提案和评论将有助于与财政部和其他监管机构就未来工作进行持续讨论，以确保国债市场的弹性。尽管美联储的WOD令人宽慰，<b>在为有利的结果做好准备后，美联储令人失望的声明几乎不是交易员所希望的消息，股市暴跌...</b></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><blockquote>债券收益率飙升...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><blockquote>...而摩根大通的股票是受SLR救济影响最大的银行（正如昨天在“面对摩根大通的杠杆救济威胁”中所指出的）...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><blockquote>....萎靡不振。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><p><blockquote>如果您一直生活在岩石下，以下是您应该关心SLR决定的原因：首先，对于那些错过了我们关于这个问题的入门知识的人来说，摩根大通的一些背景（具有讽刺意味的是，这是一家从美联储损失最大的银行）的决定）底线是，如果没有SLR救济，<b>银行可能不得不去杠杆化、筹集新资本、停止回购、出售优先股、拒绝存款并普遍减少准备金（不一定是所有这些，也不是按这个顺序），就像美联储向市场注入数千亿美元一样随着财政部耗尽其TGA账户。</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储资产负债表的大幅扩张意味着美联储银行持有的银行准备金也同样大幅增长。<b>监管救济到期将使8个GSIB的杠杆敞口增加约2.1万亿美元。此外，TGA的减少和持续的量化宽松可能会在2021年为系统再增加约2.35万亿美元的存款。</b>虽然3月31日豁免到期不会对GSIB产生直接影响，但全年杠杆资产的持续增加将增加长期债务(LTD)和优先要求。在这里，摩根大通持乐观观点，并写道<b>“即使是‘最坏’的发行情况也是非常可控的，LTD需要350亿美元来满足TLAC要求，优先需求为150-200亿美元，以将全行业SLR维持在5.6%。</b></blockquote></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><blockquote>银行实体的限制更大，其杠杆敞口增加的能力约为7,650亿美元，SLR为6.2%。”高盛的观点更令人不安：该行估计，在持续的量化宽松制度下，储备能力将出现约2万亿美元的缺口，主要是银行无法接受的存款形式，作为正在进行的量化宽松的一部分（高盛对SLR困境的全面理解更是如此）。</blockquote></p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那么接下来会发生什么呢？</b></blockquote></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><p><blockquote>针对这个话题，昨天Curvature的Scott Skyrm写道“<i>最大的银行享有更大的资产负债表，但华盛顿有政治因素反对延长豁免....以下是几种情况及其对回购市场的影响</i>：</blockquote></p><p>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p><blockquote>豁免延长3个月或6个月——对回购市场没有影响。它已经完全定价了。准备金的豁免继续，但国债的豁免结束。<b>由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性会增加。储备和国库的豁免均终止。同上。</b>换句话说，Skyrm持相对悲观的观点，警告称“由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。”此外，随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性可能会增加...</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><p><blockquote>也许有点太严厉了？上周，摩根大通为SLR制定了5种情景，其中两种预测SLR救济将于3月31日结束，具体如下：</blockquote></p><p><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p><blockquote><u><b>3.纾困3月31日结束银行全面融资</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b><u><b>4.纾困3月31日结束，银行增资去杠杆</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b>回到Zoltan，让我们回想一下，这位回购大师还警告说，“结束准备金和国债在SLR计算中的豁免可能意味着美国银行将拒绝保证金（而不是国债）的存款和准备金，为市场留出更多空间。做市活动，<b>这些资金流动将进一步增加来自TGA提款的货币基金流入。</b>\"</blockquote></p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，Zoltan预计回购或更广泛的市场不会出现广泛的混乱，相反，正如他在周二的一份报告中解释的那样，他对SLR已经产生的微不足道的影响（如果它被消除，将会产生）提供了更良性的看法。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><p><blockquote>如何确定Zoltan的良性观点是否正确？他在报告的最后写道，“鉴于我们到6月底FRA-OIS利差为零至负的看涨期权是基于SLR延期的结束以及美联储将尝试解决数量问题的假设价格而不是数量，今天的调整意味着FRA-OIS不会一直跌至零或负值。”</blockquote></p><p>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p><blockquote>这里的FRA-OIS将取决于外汇掉期相对于OIS的交易紧张程度，但以远低于零利率交易的国库券不再是一种风险...虽然账单偶尔会跌入负值，但到目前为止，它们避免了全面陷入NIRP，这可能只是市场正在等待的积极信号，以缓解与SLR豁免突然且基本上出乎意料的结束相关的紧张情绪。</blockquote></p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p><blockquote>** *</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p><blockquote>最后，对于那些好奇对市场的直接影响会是什么的人来说，国民西敏寺银行策略师布莱克·格温(Blake Gwinn)写道，美联储宣布银行监管豁免将于本月底到期，“确实是穿针引线”，缓解了人们对银行监管豁免的担忧。对市场的潜在长期影响<b>SLR承诺解决补充杠杆率的当前设计和校准问题，以防止紧张局势的发展，从而“结束了它，但化解了许多下意识的市场反应”</b>.</blockquote></p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p><blockquote>格温说：“我从来不担心银行第一天就会吐出国债或回购提款或类似的情况。”“我担心的是，从长远来看”，随着准备金继续上升，SLR是否会“成为一个麻烦并拖累国债和利差”格温总结道，通过这份声明，美联储<b>“真正解决这些恐惧，基本上是说，‘别担心，我们正在努力’。”</b></blockquote></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，随着收益率在早期四女巫交易中飙升至HOD，市场似乎确实对美联储的行动持怀疑态度。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让SLR救助到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让SLR救助到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-19 22:32</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><p><blockquote>正如本文所暗示和深入讨论的那样，在伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)和谢罗德·布朗(Sherrod Brown)等进步民主党人的政治压力下，美联储决定让临时补充杠杆率(SLR)豁免如期于3月31日（规则变更一周年）到期。</blockquote></p><p>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p><blockquote>联邦银行监管机构今天宣布，2020年5月15日发布的存款机构补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变更将于2021年3月31日如期到期。鉴于新冠肺炎事件，这一临时变化是为了为存款机构向家庭和企业提供信贷提供灵活性。这一结果是前纽约联储大师Zoltan Pozsar（再次）正确预测的结果，他跟随FOMC表示，“事实上，美联储实际上是先发制人地做出了这一调整——目前没有使用o/n RRP工具，因此没有能力限制，而回购和票据收益率尚未为负——<b>暗示美联储正在为SLR豁免的结束“铺路”</b>.\"</blockquote></p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><p><blockquote>美联储深知这将是市场的一个非常热门的问题，因此发表了以下声明以缓解交易员的紧张情绪，并指出，虽然SLR特殊待遇将于3月31日到期，但美联储正在“邀请公众就几项潜在的SLR修改发表评论”。此外，”<b>随着时间的推移，董事会可能需要解决SLR当前的设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力</b>”——简而言之，如果收益率飙升，美联储将立即重新引入SLR：</blockquote></p><p>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储周五宣布，银行控股公司补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变化将于3月31日如期到期。<b>此外，董事会将很快就调整SLR的措施征求意见。董事会将采取适当行动，确保SLR的任何变化不会削弱银行资本要求的整体实力。</b>为了缓解COVID-19大流行造成的国债市场压力并促进对家庭和企业的贷款，董事会去年暂时修改了SLR，将美国国债和央行储备排除在外。从那时起，国债市场已经稳定下来。<b>然而，由于最近中央银行储备供应和国债发行的增长，理事会可能需要随着时间的推移解决SLR的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力。为了确保SLR（2014年作为额外资本要求而设立）在准备金较高的环境下保持有效，董事会将很快就几项潜在的SLR修改征求公众意见。</b>该提案和评论将有助于与财政部和其他监管机构就未来工作进行持续讨论，以确保国债市场的弹性。尽管美联储的WOD令人宽慰，<b>在为有利的结果做好准备后，美联储令人失望的声明几乎不是交易员所希望的消息，股市暴跌...</b></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><blockquote>债券收益率飙升...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><blockquote>...而摩根大通的股票是受SLR救济影响最大的银行（正如昨天在“面对摩根大通的杠杆救济威胁”中所指出的）...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><blockquote>....萎靡不振。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><p><blockquote>如果您一直生活在岩石下，以下是您应该关心SLR决定的原因：首先，对于那些错过了我们关于这个问题的入门知识的人来说，摩根大通的一些背景（具有讽刺意味的是，这是一家从美联储损失最大的银行）的决定）底线是，如果没有SLR救济，<b>银行可能不得不去杠杆化、筹集新资本、停止回购、出售优先股、拒绝存款并普遍减少准备金（不一定是所有这些，也不是按这个顺序），就像美联储向市场注入数千亿美元一样随着财政部耗尽其TGA账户。</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储资产负债表的大幅扩张意味着美联储银行持有的银行准备金也同样大幅增长。<b>监管救济到期将使8个GSIB的杠杆敞口增加约2.1万亿美元。此外，TGA的减少和持续的量化宽松可能会在2021年为系统再增加约2.35万亿美元的存款。</b>虽然3月31日豁免到期不会对GSIB产生直接影响，但全年杠杆资产的持续增加将增加长期债务(LTD)和优先要求。在这里，摩根大通持乐观观点，并写道<b>“即使是‘最坏’的发行情况也是非常可控的，LTD需要350亿美元来满足TLAC要求，优先需求为150-200亿美元，以将全行业SLR维持在5.6%。</b></blockquote></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><blockquote>银行实体的限制更大，其杠杆敞口增加的能力约为7,650亿美元，SLR为6.2%。”高盛的观点更令人不安：该行估计，在持续的量化宽松制度下，储备能力将出现约2万亿美元的缺口，主要是银行无法接受的存款形式，作为正在进行的量化宽松的一部分（高盛对SLR困境的全面理解更是如此）。</blockquote></p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那么接下来会发生什么呢？</b></blockquote></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><p><blockquote>针对这个话题，昨天Curvature的Scott Skyrm写道“<i>最大的银行享有更大的资产负债表，但华盛顿有政治因素反对延长豁免....以下是几种情况及其对回购市场的影响</i>：</blockquote></p><p>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p><blockquote>豁免延长3个月或6个月——对回购市场没有影响。它已经完全定价了。准备金的豁免继续，但国债的豁免结束。<b>由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性会增加。储备和国库的豁免均终止。同上。</b>换句话说，Skyrm持相对悲观的观点，警告称“由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。”此外，随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性可能会增加...</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><p><blockquote>也许有点太严厉了？上周，摩根大通为SLR制定了5种情景，其中两种预测SLR救济将于3月31日结束，具体如下：</blockquote></p><p><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p><blockquote><u><b>3.纾困3月31日结束银行全面融资</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b><u><b>4.纾困3月31日结束，银行增资去杠杆</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b>回到Zoltan，让我们回想一下，这位回购大师还警告说，“结束准备金和国债在SLR计算中的豁免可能意味着美国银行将拒绝保证金（而不是国债）的存款和准备金，为市场留出更多空间。做市活动，<b>这些资金流动将进一步增加来自TGA提款的货币基金流入。</b>\"</blockquote></p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，Zoltan预计回购或更广泛的市场不会出现广泛的混乱，相反，正如他在周二的一份报告中解释的那样，他对SLR已经产生的微不足道的影响（如果它被消除，将会产生）提供了更良性的看法。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><p><blockquote>如何确定Zoltan的良性观点是否正确？他在报告的最后写道，“鉴于我们到6月底FRA-OIS利差为零至负的看涨期权是基于SLR延期的结束以及美联储将尝试解决数量问题的假设价格而不是数量，今天的调整意味着FRA-OIS不会一直跌至零或负值。”</blockquote></p><p>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p><blockquote>这里的FRA-OIS将取决于外汇掉期相对于OIS的交易紧张程度，但以远低于零利率交易的国库券不再是一种风险...虽然账单偶尔会跌入负值，但到目前为止，它们避免了全面陷入NIRP，这可能只是市场正在等待的积极信号，以缓解与SLR豁免突然且基本上出乎意料的结束相关的紧张情绪。</blockquote></p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p><blockquote>** *</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p><blockquote>最后，对于那些好奇对市场的直接影响会是什么的人来说，国民西敏寺银行策略师布莱克·格温(Blake Gwinn)写道，美联储宣布银行监管豁免将于本月底到期，“确实是穿针引线”，缓解了人们对银行监管豁免的担忧。对市场的潜在长期影响<b>SLR承诺解决补充杠杆率的当前设计和校准问题，以防止紧张局势的发展，从而“结束了它，但化解了许多下意识的市场反应”</b>.</blockquote></p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p><blockquote>格温说：“我从来不担心银行第一天就会吐出国债或回购提款或类似的情况。”“我担心的是，从长远来看”，随着准备金继续上升，SLR是否会“成为一个麻烦并拖累国债和利差”格温总结道，通过这份声明，美联储<b>“真正解决这些恐惧，基本上是说，‘别担心，我们正在努力’。”</b></blockquote></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，随着收益率在早期四女巫交易中飙升至HOD，市场似乎确实对美联储的行动持怀疑态度。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199154789","content_text":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...Bond yields spiked...... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")....... slumped.In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).So what happens next?Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital & de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.* *  *Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":950,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350563605,"gmtCreate":1616232290307,"gmtModify":1634526633806,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>Stonk please&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>Stonk please&nbsp;","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$Stonk please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/350563605","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1088,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324142588,"gmtCreate":1615978121644,"gmtModify":1703495801117,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/324142588","repostId":"1156258917","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156258917","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615977253,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1156258917?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-17 18:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Squarespace raises $300M at a staggering $10B valuation<blockquote>Squarespace以惊人的100亿美元估值筹集3亿美元</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156258917","media":"Tech Crunch","summary":"Squarespace has raised $300 million in a round of funding that values the company at a staggering $1","content":"<p>Squarespace has raised $300 million in a round of funding that values the company at a staggering $10 billion valuation.</p><p><blockquote>Squarespace在一轮融资中筹集了3亿美元，该公司的估值达到了惊人的100亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> New backers includeDragoneer, Tiger Global, D1 Capital Partners, Fidelity Management &amp; Research Company, funds and accounts advised by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and Spruce House. Existing backers Accel and General Atlantic also participated.</p><p><blockquote>新的支持者包括Dragoneer、Tiger Global、D1 Capital Partners、Fidelity Management&amp;Research Company、T.Rowe Price Associates，Inc.和Spruce House咨询的基金和账户。现有支持者Accel和General Atlantic也参与其中。</blockquote></p><p> Squarespace founder &amp; CEO Anthony Casalena said the fresh capital will advance the company’s growth initiatives and help it scale its product suite.</p><p><blockquote>Squarespace创始人兼首席执行官Anthony Casalena表示，新资本将推进公司的增长计划，并帮助其扩大产品套件。</blockquote></p><p> The move comes less than two months after the companyfiled confidentiality to go publicvia a direct listing or initial public offering.</p><p><blockquote>此举是在该公司申请保密并通过直接上市或首次公开募股上市后不到两个月。</blockquote></p><p> Squarespace, which has helped millions create their own websites, was founded in 2003 and bootstrapped until a$38.5 million Series Ain 2010 that was co-led by Accel and Index Ventures.</p><p><blockquote>Squarespace成立于2003年，帮助数百万人创建了自己的网站，并一直持续到2010年由Accel和Index Ventures共同牵头的3850万美元融资。</blockquote></p><p> The online website creation and hosting service — which has now expanded into e-commerce by hosting online stores — then raised another $40 million round in 2014. But it is perhaps best known for itsepic 2017-era $200 million secondary roundthat General Atlantic financed. That round was raised at a $1.5 billion pre-money valuation. That means it has effectively upped its valuation by more than five times in just over three years.</p><p><blockquote>这家在线网站创建和托管服务现已通过托管在线商店扩展到电子商务领域，随后在2014年又筹集了4000万美元。但它最出名的可能是General Atlantic在2017年融资的2亿美元第二轮融资。该轮融资的融资前估值为15亿美元。这意味着它的估值在短短三年多的时间里实际上提高了五倍多。</blockquote></p><p> At that time, TechCrunch reported that Squarespace was a profitable company, with revenues increasing 50% in the prior year, to about $300 million. Execs are declining to comment on the company’s latest funding round beyonda poston its website.</p><p><blockquote>当时，TechCrunch报道称Squarespace是一家盈利的公司，上一年收入增长了50%，达到约3亿美元。高管们拒绝在其网站上对该公司最新一轮融资发表评论。</blockquote></p><p> New York City-based Squarespace hasover 1,200 employees spread across its headquarters and offices in Dublin, Ireland; Portland, Oregon; and Los Angeles, California.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于纽约市的Squarespace拥有1200多名员工，分布在爱尔兰都柏林的总部和办事处；俄勒冈州波特兰；和加州洛杉矶。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1615977248280","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Squarespace raises $300M at a staggering $10B valuation<blockquote>Squarespace以惊人的100亿美元估值筹集3亿美元</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSquarespace raises $300M at a staggering $10B valuation<blockquote>Squarespace以惊人的100亿美元估值筹集3亿美元</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Tech Crunch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-17 18:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Squarespace has raised $300 million in a round of funding that values the company at a staggering $10 billion valuation.</p><p><blockquote>Squarespace在一轮融资中筹集了3亿美元，该公司的估值达到了惊人的100亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> New backers includeDragoneer, Tiger Global, D1 Capital Partners, Fidelity Management &amp; Research Company, funds and accounts advised by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and Spruce House. Existing backers Accel and General Atlantic also participated.</p><p><blockquote>新的支持者包括Dragoneer、Tiger Global、D1 Capital Partners、Fidelity Management&amp;Research Company、T.Rowe Price Associates，Inc.和Spruce House咨询的基金和账户。现有支持者Accel和General Atlantic也参与其中。</blockquote></p><p> Squarespace founder &amp; CEO Anthony Casalena said the fresh capital will advance the company’s growth initiatives and help it scale its product suite.</p><p><blockquote>Squarespace创始人兼首席执行官Anthony Casalena表示，新资本将推进公司的增长计划，并帮助其扩大产品套件。</blockquote></p><p> The move comes less than two months after the companyfiled confidentiality to go publicvia a direct listing or initial public offering.</p><p><blockquote>此举是在该公司申请保密并通过直接上市或首次公开募股上市后不到两个月。</blockquote></p><p> Squarespace, which has helped millions create their own websites, was founded in 2003 and bootstrapped until a$38.5 million Series Ain 2010 that was co-led by Accel and Index Ventures.</p><p><blockquote>Squarespace成立于2003年，帮助数百万人创建了自己的网站，并一直持续到2010年由Accel和Index Ventures共同牵头的3850万美元融资。</blockquote></p><p> The online website creation and hosting service — which has now expanded into e-commerce by hosting online stores — then raised another $40 million round in 2014. But it is perhaps best known for itsepic 2017-era $200 million secondary roundthat General Atlantic financed. That round was raised at a $1.5 billion pre-money valuation. That means it has effectively upped its valuation by more than five times in just over three years.</p><p><blockquote>这家在线网站创建和托管服务现已通过托管在线商店扩展到电子商务领域，随后在2014年又筹集了4000万美元。但它最出名的可能是General Atlantic在2017年融资的2亿美元第二轮融资。该轮融资的融资前估值为15亿美元。这意味着它的估值在短短三年多的时间里实际上提高了五倍多。</blockquote></p><p> At that time, TechCrunch reported that Squarespace was a profitable company, with revenues increasing 50% in the prior year, to about $300 million. Execs are declining to comment on the company’s latest funding round beyonda poston its website.</p><p><blockquote>当时，TechCrunch报道称Squarespace是一家盈利的公司，上一年收入增长了50%，达到约3亿美元。高管们拒绝在其网站上对该公司最新一轮融资发表评论。</blockquote></p><p> New York City-based Squarespace hasover 1,200 employees spread across its headquarters and offices in Dublin, Ireland; Portland, Oregon; and Los Angeles, California.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于纽约市的Squarespace拥有1200多名员工，分布在爱尔兰都柏林的总部和办事处；俄勒冈州波特兰；和加州洛杉矶。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://techcrunch.com/2021/03/16/squarespace-raises-300m-at-staggering-10b-valuation/\">Tech Crunch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://techcrunch.com/2021/03/16/squarespace-raises-300m-at-staggering-10b-valuation/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156258917","content_text":"Squarespace has raised $300 million in a round of funding that values the company at a staggering $10 billion valuation.\nNew backers includeDragoneer, Tiger Global, D1 Capital Partners, Fidelity Management & Research Company, funds and accounts advised by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and Spruce House. Existing backers Accel and General Atlantic also participated.\nSquarespace founder & CEO Anthony Casalena said the fresh capital will advance the company’s growth initiatives and help it scale its product suite.\nThe move comes less than two months after the companyfiled confidentiality to go publicvia a direct listing or initial public offering.\nSquarespace, which has helped millions create their own websites, was founded in 2003 and bootstrapped until a$38.5 million Series Ain 2010 that was co-led by Accel and Index Ventures.\nThe online website creation and hosting service — which has now expanded into e-commerce by hosting online stores — then raised another $40 million round in 2014. But it is perhaps best known for itsepic 2017-era $200 million secondary roundthat General Atlantic financed. That round was raised at a $1.5 billion pre-money valuation. That means it has effectively upped its valuation by more than five times in just over three years.\nAt that time, TechCrunch reported that Squarespace was a profitable company, with revenues increasing 50% in the prior year, to about $300 million. Execs are declining to comment on the company’s latest funding round beyonda poston its website.\nNew York City-based Squarespace hasover 1,200 employees spread across its headquarters and offices in Dublin, Ireland; Portland, Oregon; and Los Angeles, California.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SQ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":856,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325371457,"gmtCreate":1615869765779,"gmtModify":1703494249284,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm hmm","listText":"Hmm hmm","text":"Hmm hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325371457","repostId":"1196198740","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196198740","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615865708,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1196198740?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-16 11:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks That Could Benefit as the U.S. Tries to Fix the Chip Shortage<blockquote>随着美国试图解决芯片短缺问题，股票可能受益</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196198740","media":"Barrons","summary":"As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur","content":"<p>As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, aJ.P. Morgananalyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.</p><p><blockquote>随着美国政府越来越接近资助一批旨在刺激国内半导体制造和研究的激励和补贴，aJ.P.摩根分析师已经找出了哪些股票可能从中受益最大。</blockquote></p><p>Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well asnatural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.</p><p><blockquote>在全球芯片短缺的部分原因是Covid-19大流行和自然灾害造成的供需波动，国会今年早些时候批准了一系列针对美国芯片公司的计划和激励措施。立法者将旨在支持美国制造、研究和开发的计划纳入了2021财年国防授权法案，该法案于1月份成为法律，但没有为这些举措提供资金。</blockquote></p><p>According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通芯片分析师Harlan Sur表示，这些项目的资金可能会包含在乔·拜登总统的基础设施法案中，这是政府的下一个优先事项之一。Sur预计“重建得更好”基础设施计划将在今年上半年通过，从而从2021年下半年开始获得资金。</blockquote></p><p>Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.</p><p><blockquote>Sur的团队估计，激励和补贴总额可能在350亿至370亿美元之间，其中约180亿至200亿美元用于国内芯片制造，150亿至170亿美元用于芯片研发。</blockquote></p><p>Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.</p><p><blockquote>根据《国防授权法案》的当前措辞，苏尔在周一发布的一份报告中写道，他预计在发放资金和激励措施时，美国的集成设备制造商可能会被优先考虑。</blockquote></p><p>Those would include manufacturers such as&nbsp;Intel(ticker: INTC),Micron Technology(MU),Texas Instruments(TXN),Analog Devices(ADI), and&nbsp;On Semiconductor(ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote.Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) and&nbsp;NXP Semiconductors(NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.</p><p><blockquote>Sur写道，其中包括英特尔（股票代码：INTC）、美光科技（MU）、德州仪器（TXN）、ADI公司（ADI）和安森美半导体（ON）等制造商都可能受益。他写道，拥有美国国防相关资格的公司也很有可能受益。在美国运营的国际芯片制造商台积电(TSM)和恩智浦半导体(NXPI)也应该受益，他说，但程度较小。</blockquote></p><p>Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as&nbsp;Applied Materials(AMAT) and&nbsp;Lam Research(LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.</p><p><blockquote>应用材料公司（AMAT）和泛林研究（LRCX）等芯片制造设备公司也应该获得提振，因为激励措施导致设备采购量增加。</blockquote></p><p>The&nbsp;PHLX Semiconductor index,or Sox, advanced about 2% on Monday, led by&nbsp;NXP Semiconductors&nbsp;NXP, which rose 8.9% to $199.91, and&nbsp;Broadcom(AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.77.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX半导体指数(Sox)周一上涨约2%，其中恩智浦半导体NXP上涨8.9%，至199.91美元，博通(AVGO)上涨4.3%，至470.77美元。</blockquote></p><p>The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as&nbsp;demand for chips&nbsp;destined for productsranging from appliancesand videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.</p><p><blockquote>由于从电器和视频游戏机到汽车和智能手机等产品对芯片的需求超过了该行业生产半导体的能力，Sox在过去一年中上涨了94%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks That Could Benefit as the U.S. Tries to Fix the Chip Shortage<blockquote>随着美国试图解决芯片短缺问题，股票可能受益</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks That Could Benefit as the U.S. Tries to Fix the Chip Shortage<blockquote>随着美国试图解决芯片短缺问题，股票可能受益</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-16 11:35</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, aJ.P. Morgananalyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.</p><p><blockquote>随着美国政府越来越接近资助一批旨在刺激国内半导体制造和研究的激励和补贴，aJ.P.摩根分析师已经找出了哪些股票可能从中受益最大。</blockquote></p><p>Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well asnatural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.</p><p><blockquote>在全球芯片短缺的部分原因是Covid-19大流行和自然灾害造成的供需波动，国会今年早些时候批准了一系列针对美国芯片公司的计划和激励措施。立法者将旨在支持美国制造、研究和开发的计划纳入了2021财年国防授权法案，该法案于1月份成为法律，但没有为这些举措提供资金。</blockquote></p><p>According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通芯片分析师Harlan Sur表示，这些项目的资金可能会包含在乔·拜登总统的基础设施法案中，这是政府的下一个优先事项之一。Sur预计“重建得更好”基础设施计划将在今年上半年通过，从而从2021年下半年开始获得资金。</blockquote></p><p>Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.</p><p><blockquote>Sur的团队估计，激励和补贴总额可能在350亿至370亿美元之间，其中约180亿至200亿美元用于国内芯片制造，150亿至170亿美元用于芯片研发。</blockquote></p><p>Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.</p><p><blockquote>根据《国防授权法案》的当前措辞，苏尔在周一发布的一份报告中写道，他预计在发放资金和激励措施时，美国的集成设备制造商可能会被优先考虑。</blockquote></p><p>Those would include manufacturers such as&nbsp;Intel(ticker: INTC),Micron Technology(MU),Texas Instruments(TXN),Analog Devices(ADI), and&nbsp;On Semiconductor(ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote.Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) and&nbsp;NXP Semiconductors(NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.</p><p><blockquote>Sur写道，其中包括英特尔（股票代码：INTC）、美光科技（MU）、德州仪器（TXN）、ADI公司（ADI）和安森美半导体（ON）等制造商都可能受益。他写道，拥有美国国防相关资格的公司也很有可能受益。在美国运营的国际芯片制造商台积电(TSM)和恩智浦半导体(NXPI)也应该受益，他说，但程度较小。</blockquote></p><p>Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as&nbsp;Applied Materials(AMAT) and&nbsp;Lam Research(LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.</p><p><blockquote>应用材料公司（AMAT）和泛林研究（LRCX）等芯片制造设备公司也应该获得提振，因为激励措施导致设备采购量增加。</blockquote></p><p>The&nbsp;PHLX Semiconductor index,or Sox, advanced about 2% on Monday, led by&nbsp;NXP Semiconductors&nbsp;NXP, which rose 8.9% to $199.91, and&nbsp;Broadcom(AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.77.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX半导体指数(Sox)周一上涨约2%，其中恩智浦半导体NXP上涨8.9%，至199.91美元，博通(AVGO)上涨4.3%，至470.77美元。</blockquote></p><p>The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as&nbsp;demand for chips&nbsp;destined for productsranging from appliancesand videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.</p><p><blockquote>由于从电器和视频游戏机到汽车和智能手机等产品对芯片的需求超过了该行业生产半导体的能力，Sox在过去一年中上涨了94%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-u-s-is-trying-to-fix-the-chip-shortage-what-it-could-mean-for-semiconductor-stocks-51615838286?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TXN":"德州仪器","INTC":"英特尔","NXPI":"恩智浦","TSM":"台积电","ON":"安森美半导体","ADI":"亚德诺","MU":"美光科技"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-u-s-is-trying-to-fix-the-chip-shortage-what-it-could-mean-for-semiconductor-stocks-51615838286?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196198740","content_text":"As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, aJ.P. Morgananalyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well asnatural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.Those would include manufacturers such as Intel(ticker: INTC),Micron Technology(MU),Texas Instruments(TXN),Analog Devices(ADI), and On Semiconductor(ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote.Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) and NXP Semiconductors(NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as Applied Materials(AMAT) and Lam Research(LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.The PHLX Semiconductor index,or Sox, advanced about 2% on Monday, led by NXP Semiconductors NXP, which rose 8.9% to $199.91, and Broadcom(AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.77.The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as demand for chips destined for productsranging from appliancesand videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TXN":0.9,"NXPI":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"ON":0.9,"ADI":0.9,"MU":0.9,"TSM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325371978,"gmtCreate":1615869637294,"gmtModify":1703494248434,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm hmm","listText":"Hmm hmm","text":"Hmm hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325371978","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":513,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322687074,"gmtCreate":1615803140898,"gmtModify":1703493187476,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573442142945386","idStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322687074","repostId":"1169830276","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":578,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":386364362,"gmtCreate":1613138258156,"gmtModify":1634554381267,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>下的也多，上得更快，冲啊到月亮为止！[笑哭]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>下的也多，上得更快，冲啊到月亮为止！[笑哭]&nbsp;","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$下的也多，上得更快，冲啊到月亮为止！[笑哭]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/386364362","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3010,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":382464286,"gmtCreate":1613476898945,"gmtModify":1634553515726,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>飞去月亮吧！🌕","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>飞去月亮吧！🌕","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$飞去月亮吧！🌕","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/382464286","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":659,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":365234558,"gmtCreate":1614743686574,"gmtModify":1703480564249,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>The moon is 10 years away it seems","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>The moon is 10 years away it seems","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$The moon is 10 years away it seems","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/365234558","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":187,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":364618929,"gmtCreate":1614846179761,"gmtModify":1703481864381,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NBEV\">$New Age Beverages Corporation(NBEV)$</a>Hmmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NBEV\">$New Age Beverages Corporation(NBEV)$</a>Hmmm","text":"$New Age Beverages Corporation(NBEV)$Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/364618929","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":826,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359306978,"gmtCreate":1616335248094,"gmtModify":1634526310417,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359306978","repostId":"1199154789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199154789","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616164372,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199154789?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-19 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让SLR救助到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199154789","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio  exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on ","content":"<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><p><blockquote>正如本文所暗示和深入讨论的那样，在伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)和谢罗德·布朗(Sherrod Brown)等进步民主党人的政治压力下，美联储决定让临时补充杠杆率(SLR)豁免如期于3月31日（规则变更一周年）到期。</blockquote></p><p>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p><blockquote>联邦银行监管机构今天宣布，2020年5月15日发布的存款机构补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变更将于2021年3月31日如期到期。鉴于新冠肺炎事件，这一临时变化是为了为存款机构向家庭和企业提供信贷提供灵活性。这一结果是前纽约联储大师Zoltan Pozsar（再次）正确预测的结果，他跟随FOMC表示，“事实上，美联储实际上是先发制人地做出了这一调整——目前没有使用o/n RRP工具，因此没有能力限制，而回购和票据收益率尚未为负——<b>暗示美联储正在为SLR豁免的结束“铺路”</b>.\"</blockquote></p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><p><blockquote>美联储深知这将是市场的一个非常热门的问题，因此发表了以下声明以缓解交易员的紧张情绪，并指出，虽然SLR特殊待遇将于3月31日到期，但美联储正在“邀请公众就几项潜在的SLR修改发表评论”。此外，”<b>随着时间的推移，董事会可能需要解决SLR当前的设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力</b>”——简而言之，如果收益率飙升，美联储将立即重新引入SLR：</blockquote></p><p>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储周五宣布，银行控股公司补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变化将于3月31日如期到期。<b>此外，董事会将很快就调整SLR的措施征求意见。董事会将采取适当行动，确保SLR的任何变化不会削弱银行资本要求的整体实力。</b>为了缓解COVID-19大流行造成的国债市场压力并促进对家庭和企业的贷款，董事会去年暂时修改了SLR，将美国国债和央行储备排除在外。从那时起，国债市场已经稳定下来。<b>然而，由于最近中央银行储备供应和国债发行的增长，理事会可能需要随着时间的推移解决SLR的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力。为了确保SLR（2014年作为额外资本要求而设立）在准备金较高的环境下保持有效，董事会将很快就几项潜在的SLR修改征求公众意见。</b>该提案和评论将有助于与财政部和其他监管机构就未来工作进行持续讨论，以确保国债市场的弹性。尽管美联储的WOD令人宽慰，<b>在为有利的结果做好准备后，美联储令人失望的声明几乎不是交易员所希望的消息，股市暴跌...</b></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><blockquote>债券收益率飙升...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><blockquote>...而摩根大通的股票是受SLR救济影响最大的银行（正如昨天在“面对摩根大通的杠杆救济威胁”中所指出的）...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><blockquote>....萎靡不振。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><p><blockquote>如果您一直生活在岩石下，以下是您应该关心SLR决定的原因：首先，对于那些错过了我们关于这个问题的入门知识的人来说，摩根大通的一些背景（具有讽刺意味的是，这是一家从美联储损失最大的银行）的决定）底线是，如果没有SLR救济，<b>银行可能不得不去杠杆化、筹集新资本、停止回购、出售优先股、拒绝存款并普遍减少准备金（不一定是所有这些，也不是按这个顺序），就像美联储向市场注入数千亿美元一样随着财政部耗尽其TGA账户。</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储资产负债表的大幅扩张意味着美联储银行持有的银行准备金也同样大幅增长。<b>监管救济到期将使8个GSIB的杠杆敞口增加约2.1万亿美元。此外，TGA的减少和持续的量化宽松可能会在2021年为系统再增加约2.35万亿美元的存款。</b>虽然3月31日豁免到期不会对GSIB产生直接影响，但全年杠杆资产的持续增加将增加长期债务(LTD)和优先要求。在这里，摩根大通持乐观观点，并写道<b>“即使是‘最坏’的发行情况也是非常可控的，LTD需要350亿美元来满足TLAC要求，优先需求为150-200亿美元，以将全行业SLR维持在5.6%。</b></blockquote></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><blockquote>银行实体的限制更大，其杠杆敞口增加的能力约为7,650亿美元，SLR为6.2%。”高盛的观点更令人不安：该行估计，在持续的量化宽松制度下，储备能力将出现约2万亿美元的缺口，主要是银行无法接受的存款形式，作为正在进行的量化宽松的一部分（高盛对SLR困境的全面理解更是如此）。</blockquote></p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那么接下来会发生什么呢？</b></blockquote></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><p><blockquote>针对这个话题，昨天Curvature的Scott Skyrm写道“<i>最大的银行享有更大的资产负债表，但华盛顿有政治因素反对延长豁免....以下是几种情况及其对回购市场的影响</i>：</blockquote></p><p>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p><blockquote>豁免延长3个月或6个月——对回购市场没有影响。它已经完全定价了。准备金的豁免继续，但国债的豁免结束。<b>由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性会增加。储备和国库的豁免均终止。同上。</b>换句话说，Skyrm持相对悲观的观点，警告称“由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。”此外，随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性可能会增加...</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><p><blockquote>也许有点太严厉了？上周，摩根大通为SLR制定了5种情景，其中两种预测SLR救济将于3月31日结束，具体如下：</blockquote></p><p><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p><blockquote><u><b>3.纾困3月31日结束银行全面融资</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b><u><b>4.纾困3月31日结束，银行增资去杠杆</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b>回到Zoltan，让我们回想一下，这位回购大师还警告说，“结束准备金和国债在SLR计算中的豁免可能意味着美国银行将拒绝保证金（而不是国债）的存款和准备金，为市场留出更多空间。做市活动，<b>这些资金流动将进一步增加来自TGA提款的货币基金流入。</b>\"</blockquote></p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，Zoltan预计回购或更广泛的市场不会出现广泛的混乱，相反，正如他在周二的一份报告中解释的那样，他对SLR已经产生的微不足道的影响（如果它被消除，将会产生）提供了更良性的看法。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><p><blockquote>如何确定Zoltan的良性观点是否正确？他在报告的最后写道，“鉴于我们到6月底FRA-OIS利差为零至负的看涨期权是基于SLR延期的结束以及美联储将尝试解决数量问题的假设价格而不是数量，今天的调整意味着FRA-OIS不会一直跌至零或负值。”</blockquote></p><p>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p><blockquote>这里的FRA-OIS将取决于外汇掉期相对于OIS的交易紧张程度，但以远低于零利率交易的国库券不再是一种风险...虽然账单偶尔会跌入负值，但到目前为止，它们避免了全面陷入NIRP，这可能只是市场正在等待的积极信号，以缓解与SLR豁免突然且基本上出乎意料的结束相关的紧张情绪。</blockquote></p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p><blockquote>** *</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p><blockquote>最后，对于那些好奇对市场的直接影响会是什么的人来说，国民西敏寺银行策略师布莱克·格温(Blake Gwinn)写道，美联储宣布银行监管豁免将于本月底到期，“确实是穿针引线”，缓解了人们对银行监管豁免的担忧。对市场的潜在长期影响<b>SLR承诺解决补充杠杆率的当前设计和校准问题，以防止紧张局势的发展，从而“结束了它，但化解了许多下意识的市场反应”</b>.</blockquote></p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p><blockquote>格温说：“我从来不担心银行第一天就会吐出国债或回购提款或类似的情况。”“我担心的是，从长远来看”，随着准备金继续上升，SLR是否会“成为一个麻烦并拖累国债和利差”格温总结道，通过这份声明，美联储<b>“真正解决这些恐惧，基本上是说，‘别担心，我们正在努力’。”</b></blockquote></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，随着收益率在早期四女巫交易中飙升至HOD，市场似乎确实对美联储的行动持怀疑态度。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让SLR救助到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让SLR救助到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-19 22:32</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><p><blockquote>正如本文所暗示和深入讨论的那样，在伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)和谢罗德·布朗(Sherrod Brown)等进步民主党人的政治压力下，美联储决定让临时补充杠杆率(SLR)豁免如期于3月31日（规则变更一周年）到期。</blockquote></p><p>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p><blockquote>联邦银行监管机构今天宣布，2020年5月15日发布的存款机构补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变更将于2021年3月31日如期到期。鉴于新冠肺炎事件，这一临时变化是为了为存款机构向家庭和企业提供信贷提供灵活性。这一结果是前纽约联储大师Zoltan Pozsar（再次）正确预测的结果，他跟随FOMC表示，“事实上，美联储实际上是先发制人地做出了这一调整——目前没有使用o/n RRP工具，因此没有能力限制，而回购和票据收益率尚未为负——<b>暗示美联储正在为SLR豁免的结束“铺路”</b>.\"</blockquote></p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><p><blockquote>美联储深知这将是市场的一个非常热门的问题，因此发表了以下声明以缓解交易员的紧张情绪，并指出，虽然SLR特殊待遇将于3月31日到期，但美联储正在“邀请公众就几项潜在的SLR修改发表评论”。此外，”<b>随着时间的推移，董事会可能需要解决SLR当前的设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力</b>”——简而言之，如果收益率飙升，美联储将立即重新引入SLR：</blockquote></p><p>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储周五宣布，银行控股公司补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变化将于3月31日如期到期。<b>此外，董事会将很快就调整SLR的措施征求意见。董事会将采取适当行动，确保SLR的任何变化不会削弱银行资本要求的整体实力。</b>为了缓解COVID-19大流行造成的国债市场压力并促进对家庭和企业的贷款，董事会去年暂时修改了SLR，将美国国债和央行储备排除在外。从那时起，国债市场已经稳定下来。<b>然而，由于最近中央银行储备供应和国债发行的增长，理事会可能需要随着时间的推移解决SLR的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现既限制经济增长又破坏金融稳定的压力。为了确保SLR（2014年作为额外资本要求而设立）在准备金较高的环境下保持有效，董事会将很快就几项潜在的SLR修改征求公众意见。</b>该提案和评论将有助于与财政部和其他监管机构就未来工作进行持续讨论，以确保国债市场的弹性。尽管美联储的WOD令人宽慰，<b>在为有利的结果做好准备后，美联储令人失望的声明几乎不是交易员所希望的消息，股市暴跌...</b></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><blockquote>债券收益率飙升...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><blockquote>...而摩根大通的股票是受SLR救济影响最大的银行（正如昨天在“面对摩根大通的杠杆救济威胁”中所指出的）...</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><blockquote>....萎靡不振。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><p><blockquote>如果您一直生活在岩石下，以下是您应该关心SLR决定的原因：首先，对于那些错过了我们关于这个问题的入门知识的人来说，摩根大通的一些背景（具有讽刺意味的是，这是一家从美联储损失最大的银行）的决定）底线是，如果没有SLR救济，<b>银行可能不得不去杠杆化、筹集新资本、停止回购、出售优先股、拒绝存款并普遍减少准备金（不一定是所有这些，也不是按这个顺序），就像美联储向市场注入数千亿美元一样随着财政部耗尽其TGA账户。</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p><blockquote>美联储资产负债表的大幅扩张意味着美联储银行持有的银行准备金也同样大幅增长。<b>监管救济到期将使8个GSIB的杠杆敞口增加约2.1万亿美元。此外，TGA的减少和持续的量化宽松可能会在2021年为系统再增加约2.35万亿美元的存款。</b>虽然3月31日豁免到期不会对GSIB产生直接影响，但全年杠杆资产的持续增加将增加长期债务(LTD)和优先要求。在这里，摩根大通持乐观观点，并写道<b>“即使是‘最坏’的发行情况也是非常可控的，LTD需要350亿美元来满足TLAC要求，优先需求为150-200亿美元，以将全行业SLR维持在5.6%。</b></blockquote></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><blockquote>银行实体的限制更大，其杠杆敞口增加的能力约为7,650亿美元，SLR为6.2%。”高盛的观点更令人不安：该行估计，在持续的量化宽松制度下，储备能力将出现约2万亿美元的缺口，主要是银行无法接受的存款形式，作为正在进行的量化宽松的一部分（高盛对SLR困境的全面理解更是如此）。</blockquote></p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那么接下来会发生什么呢？</b></blockquote></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><p><blockquote>针对这个话题，昨天Curvature的Scott Skyrm写道“<i>最大的银行享有更大的资产负债表，但华盛顿有政治因素反对延长豁免....以下是几种情况及其对回购市场的影响</i>：</blockquote></p><p>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p><blockquote>豁免延长3个月或6个月——对回购市场没有影响。它已经完全定价了。准备金的豁免继续，但国债的豁免结束。<b>由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性会增加。储备和国库的豁免均终止。同上。</b>换句话说，Skyrm持相对悲观的观点，警告称“由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。”此外，随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性可能会增加...</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><p><blockquote>也许有点太严厉了？上周，摩根大通为SLR制定了5种情景，其中两种预测SLR救济将于3月31日结束，具体如下：</blockquote></p><p><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p><blockquote><u><b>3.纾困3月31日结束银行全面融资</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b><u><b>4.纾困3月31日结束，银行增资去杠杆</b></u><b>对银行利率的影响前端利率</b>回到Zoltan，让我们回想一下，这位回购大师还警告说，“结束准备金和国债在SLR计算中的豁免可能意味着美国银行将拒绝保证金（而不是国债）的存款和准备金，为市场留出更多空间。做市活动，<b>这些资金流动将进一步增加来自TGA提款的货币基金流入。</b>\"</blockquote></p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，Zoltan预计回购或更广泛的市场不会出现广泛的混乱，相反，正如他在周二的一份报告中解释的那样，他对SLR已经产生的微不足道的影响（如果它被消除，将会产生）提供了更良性的看法。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><p><blockquote>如何确定Zoltan的良性观点是否正确？他在报告的最后写道，“鉴于我们到6月底FRA-OIS利差为零至负的看涨期权是基于SLR延期的结束以及美联储将尝试解决数量问题的假设价格而不是数量，今天的调整意味着FRA-OIS不会一直跌至零或负值。”</blockquote></p><p>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p><blockquote>这里的FRA-OIS将取决于外汇掉期相对于OIS的交易紧张程度，但以远低于零利率交易的国库券不再是一种风险...虽然账单偶尔会跌入负值，但到目前为止，它们避免了全面陷入NIRP，这可能只是市场正在等待的积极信号，以缓解与SLR豁免突然且基本上出乎意料的结束相关的紧张情绪。</blockquote></p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p><blockquote>** *</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p><blockquote>最后，对于那些好奇对市场的直接影响会是什么的人来说，国民西敏寺银行策略师布莱克·格温(Blake Gwinn)写道，美联储宣布银行监管豁免将于本月底到期，“确实是穿针引线”，缓解了人们对银行监管豁免的担忧。对市场的潜在长期影响<b>SLR承诺解决补充杠杆率的当前设计和校准问题，以防止紧张局势的发展，从而“结束了它，但化解了许多下意识的市场反应”</b>.</blockquote></p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p><blockquote>格温说：“我从来不担心银行第一天就会吐出国债或回购提款或类似的情况。”“我担心的是，从长远来看”，随着准备金继续上升，SLR是否会“成为一个麻烦并拖累国债和利差”格温总结道，通过这份声明，美联储<b>“真正解决这些恐惧，基本上是说，‘别担心，我们正在努力’。”</b></blockquote></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，随着收益率在早期四女巫交易中飙升至HOD，市场似乎确实对美联储的行动持怀疑态度。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199154789","content_text":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...Bond yields spiked...... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")....... slumped.In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).So what happens next?Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital & de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.* *  *Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":950,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350563605,"gmtCreate":1616232290307,"gmtModify":1634526633806,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>Stonk please&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>Stonk please&nbsp;","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$Stonk please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/350563605","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1088,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":388502101,"gmtCreate":1613060644103,"gmtModify":1703769100191,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>To the moon my friends !!![得意]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>To the moon my friends !!![得意]&nbsp;","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$To the moon my friends !!![得意]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/388502101","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":728,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":349363302,"gmtCreate":1617545984706,"gmtModify":1634520576497,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/349363302","repostId":"1121666420","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121666420","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617365764,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121666420?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-02 20:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Has Given Up on These 3 Stocks, and That's a Huge Mistake<blockquote>华尔街放弃了这三只股票，这是一个巨大的错误</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121666420","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forval","content":"<p>It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forvalue stocksis pretty simple: Find financially robust companies that have performed poorly from a share price perspective, and buy them when they're down. When the share price comes back to reality, you'll be a winner. Wall Street has the habit of kicking a stock when it's down, as negative sentiment surrounding a particular name can spell doom for shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>现在是寻找纸面上盈利的遭受重创的股票的最佳时机。寻找价值股票非常简单：找到从股价角度来看表现不佳的财务稳健的公司，并在它们下跌时买入它们。当股价回到现实时，你将是赢家。华尔街有在股票下跌时踢掉股票的习惯，因为围绕某个特定名称的负面情绪可能会给股东带来厄运。</blockquote></p><p>For those seeking value, these moments present an opportunity. Here, we'll look at three value stocks that have seen better days, but also have a good chance at rebounding.</p><p><blockquote>对于那些寻求价值的人来说，这些时刻提供了一个机会。在这里，我们将关注三只价值股，它们经历了更好的日子，但也有很好的反弹机会。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gilead Sciences</b></p><p><blockquote><b>吉利德科学</b></blockquote></p><p>Over the past five years,<b>Gilead Sciences</b>(NASDAQ:GILD)has managed to lose about 40% of its value on the open market, and has vastly underperformed apassively held index fundover the same period (as shown below). As a market leader in the oncology, HIV, and hepatitis C drug markets, respectively, the company produces a suite of antivirals for typically hard-to-treat illnesses. While Gilead was -- and is -- front-and-center during the pandemic in its production of Veklury (more commonly known as remdesivir), it is not one of the major vaccine producers.</p><p><blockquote>五年来，<b>吉利德科学</b>（纳斯达克：GILD）在公开市场上损失了约40%的价值，并且同期的表现远远落后于被动持有的指数基金（如下所示）。作为肿瘤学、艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎药物市场的市场领导者，该公司生产一系列针对通常难以治疗的疾病的抗病毒药物。虽然吉利德在大流行期间一直是Veklury（通常称为remdesivir）生产的前沿和中心，但它并不是主要的疫苗生产商之一。</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps the better news for those considering a Gilead investment is that the company is fundamentally quite strong. It trades at 9 times earnings, which is comparably cheap across the large-cap biotech sector. It projects a strong 2021, releasing guidance for revenue of $25 billion and EPS in the $7 range .</p><p><blockquote>对于那些考虑投资吉利德的人来说，也许更好的消息是该公司从根本上来说相当强大。它的市盈率为9倍，在大型生物技术行业中相对便宜。它预计2021年将表现强劲，发布的收入指引为250亿美元，每股收益在7美元左右。</blockquote></p><p>Put simply, the company trades at an attractive price relative to the earnings it generates, and the hope is that patients start treatment for other viral and chronic (non-COVID) illnesses now that the pandemic has waned a bit in the early part of the year.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之，相对于其产生的收入，该公司的交易价格具有吸引力，希望患者能够开始治疗其他病毒性和慢性（非新冠）疾病，因为疫情在今年年初有所减弱。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e7203dcf348bdd13924f561f04db9af\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"435\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>DISH Network</b></p><p><blockquote><b>碟形网络</b></blockquote></p><p>Despite a stagnant stock price --<b>DISH Network</b>(NASDAQ:DISH)has fallen from just under $50 per share to around $35 today -- there is reason to believe a comeback is in the works. The stock currently trades at 11 times earnings, relatively cheap based on today's standards, and posted strong revenue growth in 2020, up about 40% from 2019.</p><p><blockquote>尽管股价停滞不前--<b>碟形网络</b>（纳斯达克：DISH）的股价已从每股略低于50美元跌至今天的35美元左右——有理由相信股价正在卷土重来。该股目前的市盈率为11倍，以今天的标准来看相对便宜，2020年收入增长强劲，较2019年增长约40%。</blockquote></p><p>DISH has engaged in a few creative partnerships; perhaps the most promising of the bunchis a pact with DraftKings, which seeks to offer sports betting from DISH set-top boxes. The underlying current here is that DISH Network has shown an ability to think outside the box, which is reflected in itsprofitability measures. It is a buy at its current price, and has an opportunity to stage a comeback in the coming years.</p><p><blockquote>DISH参与了一些创造性的合作；也许其中最有前途的是与DraftKings的协议，该协议旨在通过碟形机顶盒提供体育博彩。这里的潜在趋势是，DISH Network已经表现出了跳出框框思考的能力，这反映在其盈利能力指标上。以目前的价格买入，并有机会在未来几年卷土重来。</blockquote></p><p><b>Tupperware Brands</b></p><p><blockquote><b>特百惠品牌</b></blockquote></p><p>While not the most high-flying name you've ever heard,<b>Tupperware Brands</b>(NYSE:TUP)simply runs a sustainably profitable business. Last year's earnings were $2.24 a share, and the stock currently trades around $25 per share, leading to a current price-to-earnings ratio of only about 11. While overall sales were down in 2020, profitable sales growth rose, a sign that the company is still able to control costs and make money in the most difficult of circumstances.</p><p><blockquote>虽然不是你听过的最崇高的名字，<b>特百惠品牌</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TUP）只是经营一项可持续盈利的业务。去年的每股收益为2.24美元，该股目前的交易价格约为每股25美元，导致目前的市盈率仅为11左右。虽然2020年整体销售额下降，但盈利销售额增长上升，这表明该公司仍然能够在最困难的情况下控制成本并赚钱。</blockquote></p><p>The stock has also lost two-thirds of its value since 2013 but remains profitable. According to its year-end press release, the company has been successful in restructuring its debt and executing on its turnaround plans (especially concerning its core businesses). Shares remain cheap for the moment, but the fact remains: The company makes money and has the financials to prove it.</p><p><blockquote>自2013年以来，该股的价值也损失了三分之二，但仍保持盈利。根据其年终新闻稿，该公司已成功重组债务并执行扭亏为盈计划（特别是有关其核心业务）。目前股价仍然便宜，但事实仍然是：该公司赚钱，并且有财务数据证明这一点。</blockquote></p><p><b>When in doubt, seek value</b></p><p><blockquote><b>当有疑问时，寻求价值</b></blockquote></p><p>The basic premise of value investing is to find profitable companies that happen to be on sale in the open market. While single-stock investing is far from a guaranteed strategy, it's worth looking into seemingly \"forgotten\" companies that simply have not yet had their day in the sun. Companies that have demonstrated their ability to grow and sustain profitability are your best bet, especially when they're cheap.</p><p><blockquote>价值投资的基本前提是找到盈利的公司，而这些公司恰好在公开市场上出售。虽然单一股票投资远非一种有保证的策略，但值得关注那些看似“被遗忘”的公司，这些公司只是还没有成功。已经证明有能力增长和维持盈利能力的公司是你最好的选择，尤其是当它们很便宜的时候。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Has Given Up on These 3 Stocks, and That's a Huge Mistake<blockquote>华尔街放弃了这三只股票，这是一个巨大的错误</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Has Given Up on These 3 Stocks, and That's a Huge Mistake<blockquote>华尔街放弃了这三只股票，这是一个巨大的错误</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-02 20:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forvalue stocksis pretty simple: Find financially robust companies that have performed poorly from a share price perspective, and buy them when they're down. When the share price comes back to reality, you'll be a winner. Wall Street has the habit of kicking a stock when it's down, as negative sentiment surrounding a particular name can spell doom for shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>现在是寻找纸面上盈利的遭受重创的股票的最佳时机。寻找价值股票非常简单：找到从股价角度来看表现不佳的财务稳健的公司，并在它们下跌时买入它们。当股价回到现实时，你将是赢家。华尔街有在股票下跌时踢掉股票的习惯，因为围绕某个特定名称的负面情绪可能会给股东带来厄运。</blockquote></p><p>For those seeking value, these moments present an opportunity. Here, we'll look at three value stocks that have seen better days, but also have a good chance at rebounding.</p><p><blockquote>对于那些寻求价值的人来说，这些时刻提供了一个机会。在这里，我们将关注三只价值股，它们经历了更好的日子，但也有很好的反弹机会。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gilead Sciences</b></p><p><blockquote><b>吉利德科学</b></blockquote></p><p>Over the past five years,<b>Gilead Sciences</b>(NASDAQ:GILD)has managed to lose about 40% of its value on the open market, and has vastly underperformed apassively held index fundover the same period (as shown below). As a market leader in the oncology, HIV, and hepatitis C drug markets, respectively, the company produces a suite of antivirals for typically hard-to-treat illnesses. While Gilead was -- and is -- front-and-center during the pandemic in its production of Veklury (more commonly known as remdesivir), it is not one of the major vaccine producers.</p><p><blockquote>五年来，<b>吉利德科学</b>（纳斯达克：GILD）在公开市场上损失了约40%的价值，并且同期的表现远远落后于被动持有的指数基金（如下所示）。作为肿瘤学、艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎药物市场的市场领导者，该公司生产一系列针对通常难以治疗的疾病的抗病毒药物。虽然吉利德在大流行期间一直是Veklury（通常称为remdesivir）生产的前沿和中心，但它并不是主要的疫苗生产商之一。</blockquote></p><p>Perhaps the better news for those considering a Gilead investment is that the company is fundamentally quite strong. It trades at 9 times earnings, which is comparably cheap across the large-cap biotech sector. It projects a strong 2021, releasing guidance for revenue of $25 billion and EPS in the $7 range .</p><p><blockquote>对于那些考虑投资吉利德的人来说，也许更好的消息是该公司从根本上来说相当强大。它的市盈率为9倍，在大型生物技术行业中相对便宜。它预计2021年将表现强劲，发布的收入指引为250亿美元，每股收益在7美元左右。</blockquote></p><p>Put simply, the company trades at an attractive price relative to the earnings it generates, and the hope is that patients start treatment for other viral and chronic (non-COVID) illnesses now that the pandemic has waned a bit in the early part of the year.</p><p><blockquote>简而言之，相对于其产生的收入，该公司的交易价格具有吸引力，希望患者能够开始治疗其他病毒性和慢性（非新冠）疾病，因为疫情在今年年初有所减弱。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e7203dcf348bdd13924f561f04db9af\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"435\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>DISH Network</b></p><p><blockquote><b>碟形网络</b></blockquote></p><p>Despite a stagnant stock price --<b>DISH Network</b>(NASDAQ:DISH)has fallen from just under $50 per share to around $35 today -- there is reason to believe a comeback is in the works. The stock currently trades at 11 times earnings, relatively cheap based on today's standards, and posted strong revenue growth in 2020, up about 40% from 2019.</p><p><blockquote>尽管股价停滞不前--<b>碟形网络</b>（纳斯达克：DISH）的股价已从每股略低于50美元跌至今天的35美元左右——有理由相信股价正在卷土重来。该股目前的市盈率为11倍，以今天的标准来看相对便宜，2020年收入增长强劲，较2019年增长约40%。</blockquote></p><p>DISH has engaged in a few creative partnerships; perhaps the most promising of the bunchis a pact with DraftKings, which seeks to offer sports betting from DISH set-top boxes. The underlying current here is that DISH Network has shown an ability to think outside the box, which is reflected in itsprofitability measures. It is a buy at its current price, and has an opportunity to stage a comeback in the coming years.</p><p><blockquote>DISH参与了一些创造性的合作；也许其中最有前途的是与DraftKings的协议，该协议旨在通过碟形机顶盒提供体育博彩。这里的潜在趋势是，DISH Network已经表现出了跳出框框思考的能力，这反映在其盈利能力指标上。以目前的价格买入，并有机会在未来几年卷土重来。</blockquote></p><p><b>Tupperware Brands</b></p><p><blockquote><b>特百惠品牌</b></blockquote></p><p>While not the most high-flying name you've ever heard,<b>Tupperware Brands</b>(NYSE:TUP)simply runs a sustainably profitable business. Last year's earnings were $2.24 a share, and the stock currently trades around $25 per share, leading to a current price-to-earnings ratio of only about 11. While overall sales were down in 2020, profitable sales growth rose, a sign that the company is still able to control costs and make money in the most difficult of circumstances.</p><p><blockquote>虽然不是你听过的最崇高的名字，<b>特百惠品牌</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TUP）只是经营一项可持续盈利的业务。去年的每股收益为2.24美元，该股目前的交易价格约为每股25美元，导致目前的市盈率仅为11左右。虽然2020年整体销售额下降，但盈利销售额增长上升，这表明该公司仍然能够在最困难的情况下控制成本并赚钱。</blockquote></p><p>The stock has also lost two-thirds of its value since 2013 but remains profitable. According to its year-end press release, the company has been successful in restructuring its debt and executing on its turnaround plans (especially concerning its core businesses). Shares remain cheap for the moment, but the fact remains: The company makes money and has the financials to prove it.</p><p><blockquote>自2013年以来，该股的价值也损失了三分之二，但仍保持盈利。根据其年终新闻稿，该公司已成功重组债务并执行扭亏为盈计划（特别是有关其核心业务）。目前股价仍然便宜，但事实仍然是：该公司赚钱，并且有财务数据证明这一点。</blockquote></p><p><b>When in doubt, seek value</b></p><p><blockquote><b>当有疑问时，寻求价值</b></blockquote></p><p>The basic premise of value investing is to find profitable companies that happen to be on sale in the open market. While single-stock investing is far from a guaranteed strategy, it's worth looking into seemingly \"forgotten\" companies that simply have not yet had their day in the sun. Companies that have demonstrated their ability to grow and sustain profitability are your best bet, especially when they're cheap.</p><p><blockquote>价值投资的基本前提是找到盈利的公司，而这些公司恰好在公开市场上出售。虽然单一股票投资远非一种有保证的策略，但值得关注那些看似“被遗忘”的公司，这些公司只是还没有成功。已经证明有能力增长和维持盈利能力的公司是你最好的选择，尤其是当它们很便宜的时候。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/02/wall-street-has-given-up-on-these-3-stocks-and-tha/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GILD":"吉利德科学","DISH":"Dish Network"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/02/wall-street-has-given-up-on-these-3-stocks-and-tha/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121666420","content_text":"It's never a bad time to search for beaten-down stocks that are profitable on paper.Searching forvalue stocksis pretty simple: Find financially robust companies that have performed poorly from a share price perspective, and buy them when they're down. When the share price comes back to reality, you'll be a winner. Wall Street has the habit of kicking a stock when it's down, as negative sentiment surrounding a particular name can spell doom for shareholders.For those seeking value, these moments present an opportunity. Here, we'll look at three value stocks that have seen better days, but also have a good chance at rebounding.Gilead SciencesOver the past five years,Gilead Sciences(NASDAQ:GILD)has managed to lose about 40% of its value on the open market, and has vastly underperformed apassively held index fundover the same period (as shown below). As a market leader in the oncology, HIV, and hepatitis C drug markets, respectively, the company produces a suite of antivirals for typically hard-to-treat illnesses. While Gilead was -- and is -- front-and-center during the pandemic in its production of Veklury (more commonly known as remdesivir), it is not one of the major vaccine producers.Perhaps the better news for those considering a Gilead investment is that the company is fundamentally quite strong. It trades at 9 times earnings, which is comparably cheap across the large-cap biotech sector. It projects a strong 2021, releasing guidance for revenue of $25 billion and EPS in the $7 range .Put simply, the company trades at an attractive price relative to the earnings it generates, and the hope is that patients start treatment for other viral and chronic (non-COVID) illnesses now that the pandemic has waned a bit in the early part of the year.DISH NetworkDespite a stagnant stock price --DISH Network(NASDAQ:DISH)has fallen from just under $50 per share to around $35 today -- there is reason to believe a comeback is in the works. The stock currently trades at 11 times earnings, relatively cheap based on today's standards, and posted strong revenue growth in 2020, up about 40% from 2019.DISH has engaged in a few creative partnerships; perhaps the most promising of the bunchis a pact with DraftKings, which seeks to offer sports betting from DISH set-top boxes. The underlying current here is that DISH Network has shown an ability to think outside the box, which is reflected in itsprofitability measures. It is a buy at its current price, and has an opportunity to stage a comeback in the coming years.Tupperware BrandsWhile not the most high-flying name you've ever heard,Tupperware Brands(NYSE:TUP)simply runs a sustainably profitable business. Last year's earnings were $2.24 a share, and the stock currently trades around $25 per share, leading to a current price-to-earnings ratio of only about 11. While overall sales were down in 2020, profitable sales growth rose, a sign that the company is still able to control costs and make money in the most difficult of circumstances.The stock has also lost two-thirds of its value since 2013 but remains profitable. According to its year-end press release, the company has been successful in restructuring its debt and executing on its turnaround plans (especially concerning its core businesses). Shares remain cheap for the moment, but the fact remains: The company makes money and has the financials to prove it.When in doubt, seek valueThe basic premise of value investing is to find profitable companies that happen to be on sale in the open market. While single-stock investing is far from a guaranteed strategy, it's worth looking into seemingly \"forgotten\" companies that simply have not yet had their day in the sun. Companies that have demonstrated their ability to grow and sustain profitability are your best bet, especially when they're cheap.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DISH":0.9,"GILD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1610,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351272328,"gmtCreate":1616600338864,"gmtModify":1634524967953,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351272328","repostId":"2121457670","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":814,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":346246264,"gmtCreate":1618057074558,"gmtModify":1634295040650,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/346246264","repostId":"1106014844","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106014844","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617979503,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106014844?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-09 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Bill.com the Cathie Wood Stock for You?<blockquote>Bill.com是您的Cathie Wood股票吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106014844","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.\nWhen Cathie Wood adds a stock or i","content":"<p>This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.</p><p><blockquote>这家金融科技公司自上市以来已上涨约300%。</blockquote></p><p> When Cathie Wood adds a stock or increases her positions in one of her portfolios, people pay attention. Wood is the founder and CEO of ARK Invest, a company that runs some of the top-performing exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Her actively managed ETFs -- including&nbsp;<b>ARK Innovation</b>,<b>ARK Genomic Revolution</b>, and&nbsp;<b>ARK Next Generation Internet</b>&nbsp;-- are mostly focused on technology stocks and have all posted huge returns over the past five years.</p><p><blockquote>当凯西·伍德(Cathie Wood)增加一只股票或增加其投资组合中的头寸时，人们会关注。伍德是ARK Invest的创始人兼首席执行官，该公司运营着一些表现最好的交易所交易基金(ETF)。她积极管理的ETF——包括<b>方舟创新</b>,<b>方舟基因组革命</b>，和<b>方舟下一代互联网</b>——大多专注于科技股，并且在过去五年中都取得了巨额回报。</blockquote></p><p> At the end of March, Wood increased her investment in a company called&nbsp;<b>Bill.com</b>(NYSE:BILL)in one of her portfolios,<b>ARK Fintech Innovation</b>. It caught our attention, so let's take a look at the stock to see if it's one you should consider buying.</p><p><blockquote>3月底，伍德增加了对一家名为<b>Bill.com</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BILL）在她的一个投资组合中，<b>方舟金融科技创新</b>.它引起了我们的注意，所以让我们看看这只股票，看看它是否是您应该考虑购买的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>On cloud nine</b></p><p><blockquote><b>九霄云外</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's cloud-based platform simplifies billing, payment processing, accounting, and other back-office operations for small- and mid-sized business. The platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the invoicing and bill paying process -- essentially, it allows companies to automate these jobs, saving money on doing it in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com基于云的平台简化了中小型企业的计费、支付处理、会计和其他后台操作。该平台使用人工智能（AI）和机器学习来简化发票和账单支付流程——本质上，它允许公司自动化这些工作，从而节省内部工作的资金。</blockquote></p><p> Since the company went public in December 2019, its stock price has more than quadrupled, from $36 per share when it started trading to more than $157 at Thursday's close. It gained 171% in 2020 and is up more than 15% year to date in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>自该公司2019年12月上市以来，其股价已翻了两番多，从开始交易时的每股36美元涨至周四收盘时的每股157美元以上。该股在2020年上涨了171%，2021年迄今上涨了15%以上。</blockquote></p><p> The company makes money mostly on subscriptions its clients pay for the service, so it's a reliable, repeatable income stream that grows as it adds clients. The company also makes a far smaller percentage of revenue on interest earned holding funds for clients. In the fiscal second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, revenue spiked 38% year over year to $54 million, with $52.3 million coming from subscription and transaction fees.</p><p><blockquote>该公司主要通过客户为服务付费的订阅来赚钱，因此这是一个可靠、可重复的收入来源，随着客户的增加而增长。该公司为客户持有基金所赚取的利息收入比例也要小得多。在截至12月31日的第二财季，收入同比飙升38%至5400万美元，其中5230万美元来自订阅和交易费用。</blockquote></p><p> The company is not yet profitable, posting a net loss of $17.2 million in the quarter, but it posted a huge gross margin of 75%, which is the revenue after subtracting the cost of producing the item being sold. So while it may not be profitable for a few more quarters. But once its investments in its technology and operations increase operating efficiency, those high gross margins will eventually translate into high profit margins.</p><p><blockquote>该公司尚未盈利，本季度净亏损1720万美元，但毛利率高达75%，这是减去所售商品的生产成本后的收入。因此，虽然它可能在未来几个季度内无法盈利。但一旦其对技术和运营的投资提高了运营效率，这些高毛利率最终将转化为高利润率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Pardon the disruption</b></p><p><blockquote><b>抱歉打扰了</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com has more than 100,000 customers, up nearly 30% from the previous year. While this is a very competitive space,Bill.com is a disruptor, and there is a huge market opportunity. As my Foolish colleagues&nbsp;Jason Moser and Matthew Frankel&nbsp;pointed out in a recent podcast, there are 20 million small- and mid-sized businesses and an addressable market of $30 billion globally, including $9 billion in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com拥有超过10万名客户，比上年增长近30%。虽然这是一个竞争非常激烈的领域，但Bill.com是一个颠覆者，存在巨大的市场机会。正如我愚蠢的同事杰森·莫泽和马修·弗兰克尔在最近的播客中指出的那样，全球有2000万家中小企业和300亿美元的潜在市场，其中美国有90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But founder and CEO Rene Lacerte thinks of the&nbsp;fintech&nbsp;not just in terms of customers, but of the network of 2.5 million \"members,\" including the users and partners of all of its clients. \"We believe we are the leading digital B2B payments platform for SMBs (small and mid-sized businesses) and operate one of the largest B2B networks in the United States,\" Lacerte said on the&nbsp;most recent earnings call. That is a huge network of users on which to grow. The bigger the network, the more potential value it has for its members. Also, this growth allows Bill.com the opportunity to form deeper relationships with those on the network, offering additional products and services.</p><p><blockquote>但创始人兼首席执行官Rene Lacerte不仅从客户的角度看待金融科技，还从250万“会员”的角度看待金融科技，包括所有客户的用户和合作伙伴。Lacerte在最近的财报看涨期权上表示：“我们相信我们是SMB（中小型企业）领先的数字B2B支付平台，并运营着美国最大的B2B网络之一。”这是一个巨大的用户网络，可以在此基础上成长。网络越大，对其成员的潜在价值就越大。此外，这种增长使Bill.com有机会与网络上的人建立更深层次的关系，提供额外的产品和服务。</blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's other potential competitive advantage is its AI, which gets more intuitive and robust the more customers it gets and the more data it gathers. The better the AI, the more efficient, convenient and useful the service becomes.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com的另一个潜在竞争优势是其人工智能，它获得的客户越多，收集的数据越多，人工智能就会变得更加直观和强大。人工智能越好，服务就变得越高效、越方便、越有用。</blockquote></p><p> This is a young, disruptive company that's in growth mode, with a low-expense business model and high earnings potential, that will soon be profitable. If you are looking for a growth stock with long-term potential, this Cathie Wood stock -- one she has identified as a fintech innovator -- would not be a bad choice.</p><p><blockquote>这是一家年轻的、颠覆性的公司，正处于增长模式，具有低费用的商业模式和高盈利潜力，很快就会盈利。如果您正在寻找一只具有长期潜力的成长型股票，那么这只Cathie Wood股票（她将其视为金融科技创新者）将是一个不错的选择。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Bill.com the Cathie Wood Stock for You?<blockquote>Bill.com是您的Cathie Wood股票吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Bill.com the Cathie Wood Stock for You?<blockquote>Bill.com是您的Cathie Wood股票吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-09 22:45</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.</p><p><blockquote>这家金融科技公司自上市以来已上涨约300%。</blockquote></p><p> When Cathie Wood adds a stock or increases her positions in one of her portfolios, people pay attention. Wood is the founder and CEO of ARK Invest, a company that runs some of the top-performing exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Her actively managed ETFs -- including&nbsp;<b>ARK Innovation</b>,<b>ARK Genomic Revolution</b>, and&nbsp;<b>ARK Next Generation Internet</b>&nbsp;-- are mostly focused on technology stocks and have all posted huge returns over the past five years.</p><p><blockquote>当凯西·伍德(Cathie Wood)增加一只股票或增加其投资组合中的头寸时，人们会关注。伍德是ARK Invest的创始人兼首席执行官，该公司运营着一些表现最好的交易所交易基金(ETF)。她积极管理的ETF——包括<b>方舟创新</b>,<b>方舟基因组革命</b>，和<b>方舟下一代互联网</b>——大多专注于科技股，并且在过去五年中都取得了巨额回报。</blockquote></p><p> At the end of March, Wood increased her investment in a company called&nbsp;<b>Bill.com</b>(NYSE:BILL)in one of her portfolios,<b>ARK Fintech Innovation</b>. It caught our attention, so let's take a look at the stock to see if it's one you should consider buying.</p><p><blockquote>3月底，伍德增加了对一家名为<b>Bill.com</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BILL）在她的一个投资组合中，<b>方舟金融科技创新</b>.它引起了我们的注意，所以让我们看看这只股票，看看它是否是您应该考虑购买的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>On cloud nine</b></p><p><blockquote><b>九霄云外</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's cloud-based platform simplifies billing, payment processing, accounting, and other back-office operations for small- and mid-sized business. The platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the invoicing and bill paying process -- essentially, it allows companies to automate these jobs, saving money on doing it in-house.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com基于云的平台简化了中小型企业的计费、支付处理、会计和其他后台操作。该平台使用人工智能（AI）和机器学习来简化发票和账单支付流程——本质上，它允许公司自动化这些工作，从而节省内部工作的资金。</blockquote></p><p> Since the company went public in December 2019, its stock price has more than quadrupled, from $36 per share when it started trading to more than $157 at Thursday's close. It gained 171% in 2020 and is up more than 15% year to date in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>自该公司2019年12月上市以来，其股价已翻了两番多，从开始交易时的每股36美元涨至周四收盘时的每股157美元以上。该股在2020年上涨了171%，2021年迄今上涨了15%以上。</blockquote></p><p> The company makes money mostly on subscriptions its clients pay for the service, so it's a reliable, repeatable income stream that grows as it adds clients. The company also makes a far smaller percentage of revenue on interest earned holding funds for clients. In the fiscal second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, revenue spiked 38% year over year to $54 million, with $52.3 million coming from subscription and transaction fees.</p><p><blockquote>该公司主要通过客户为服务付费的订阅来赚钱，因此这是一个可靠、可重复的收入来源，随着客户的增加而增长。该公司为客户持有基金所赚取的利息收入比例也要小得多。在截至12月31日的第二财季，收入同比飙升38%至5400万美元，其中5230万美元来自订阅和交易费用。</blockquote></p><p> The company is not yet profitable, posting a net loss of $17.2 million in the quarter, but it posted a huge gross margin of 75%, which is the revenue after subtracting the cost of producing the item being sold. So while it may not be profitable for a few more quarters. But once its investments in its technology and operations increase operating efficiency, those high gross margins will eventually translate into high profit margins.</p><p><blockquote>该公司尚未盈利，本季度净亏损1720万美元，但毛利率高达75%，这是减去所售商品的生产成本后的收入。因此，虽然它可能在未来几个季度内无法盈利。但一旦其对技术和运营的投资提高了运营效率，这些高毛利率最终将转化为高利润率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Pardon the disruption</b></p><p><blockquote><b>抱歉打扰了</b></blockquote></p><p> Bill.com has more than 100,000 customers, up nearly 30% from the previous year. While this is a very competitive space,Bill.com is a disruptor, and there is a huge market opportunity. As my Foolish colleagues&nbsp;Jason Moser and Matthew Frankel&nbsp;pointed out in a recent podcast, there are 20 million small- and mid-sized businesses and an addressable market of $30 billion globally, including $9 billion in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com拥有超过10万名客户，比上年增长近30%。虽然这是一个竞争非常激烈的领域，但Bill.com是一个颠覆者，存在巨大的市场机会。正如我愚蠢的同事杰森·莫泽和马修·弗兰克尔在最近的播客中指出的那样，全球有2000万家中小企业和300亿美元的潜在市场，其中美国有90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But founder and CEO Rene Lacerte thinks of the&nbsp;fintech&nbsp;not just in terms of customers, but of the network of 2.5 million \"members,\" including the users and partners of all of its clients. \"We believe we are the leading digital B2B payments platform for SMBs (small and mid-sized businesses) and operate one of the largest B2B networks in the United States,\" Lacerte said on the&nbsp;most recent earnings call. That is a huge network of users on which to grow. The bigger the network, the more potential value it has for its members. Also, this growth allows Bill.com the opportunity to form deeper relationships with those on the network, offering additional products and services.</p><p><blockquote>但创始人兼首席执行官Rene Lacerte不仅从客户的角度看待金融科技，还从250万“会员”的角度看待金融科技，包括所有客户的用户和合作伙伴。Lacerte在最近的财报看涨期权上表示：“我们相信我们是SMB（中小型企业）领先的数字B2B支付平台，并运营着美国最大的B2B网络之一。”这是一个巨大的用户网络，可以在此基础上成长。网络越大，对其成员的潜在价值就越大。此外，这种增长使Bill.com有机会与网络上的人建立更深层次的关系，提供额外的产品和服务。</blockquote></p><p> Bill.com's other potential competitive advantage is its AI, which gets more intuitive and robust the more customers it gets and the more data it gathers. The better the AI, the more efficient, convenient and useful the service becomes.</p><p><blockquote>Bill.com的另一个潜在竞争优势是其人工智能，它获得的客户越多，收集的数据越多，人工智能就会变得更加直观和强大。人工智能越好，服务就变得越高效、越方便、越有用。</blockquote></p><p> This is a young, disruptive company that's in growth mode, with a low-expense business model and high earnings potential, that will soon be profitable. If you are looking for a growth stock with long-term potential, this Cathie Wood stock -- one she has identified as a fintech innovator -- would not be a bad choice.</p><p><blockquote>这是一家年轻的、颠覆性的公司，正处于增长模式，具有低费用的商业模式和高盈利潜力，很快就会盈利。如果您正在寻找一只具有长期潜力的成长型股票，那么这只Cathie Wood股票（她将其视为金融科技创新者）将是一个不错的选择。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/09/is-billcom-the-cathie-wood-stock-for-you/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BILL":"BILL HOLDINGS INC","ARKW":"ARK Next Generation Internet ETF","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","ARKG":"ARK Genomic Revolution ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/09/is-billcom-the-cathie-wood-stock-for-you/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106014844","content_text":"This fintech has posted a roughly 300% gain since it went public.\nWhen Cathie Wood adds a stock or increases her positions in one of her portfolios, people pay attention. Wood is the founder and CEO of ARK Invest, a company that runs some of the top-performing exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Her actively managed ETFs -- including ARK Innovation,ARK Genomic Revolution, and ARK Next Generation Internet -- are mostly focused on technology stocks and have all posted huge returns over the past five years.\nAt the end of March, Wood increased her investment in a company called Bill.com(NYSE:BILL)in one of her portfolios,ARK Fintech Innovation. It caught our attention, so let's take a look at the stock to see if it's one you should consider buying.\nOn cloud nine\nBill.com's cloud-based platform simplifies billing, payment processing, accounting, and other back-office operations for small- and mid-sized business. The platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the invoicing and bill paying process -- essentially, it allows companies to automate these jobs, saving money on doing it in-house.\nSince the company went public in December 2019, its stock price has more than quadrupled, from $36 per share when it started trading to more than $157 at Thursday's close. It gained 171% in 2020 and is up more than 15% year to date in 2021.\nThe company makes money mostly on subscriptions its clients pay for the service, so it's a reliable, repeatable income stream that grows as it adds clients. The company also makes a far smaller percentage of revenue on interest earned holding funds for clients. In the fiscal second quarter, which ended Dec. 31, revenue spiked 38% year over year to $54 million, with $52.3 million coming from subscription and transaction fees.\nThe company is not yet profitable, posting a net loss of $17.2 million in the quarter, but it posted a huge gross margin of 75%, which is the revenue after subtracting the cost of producing the item being sold. So while it may not be profitable for a few more quarters. But once its investments in its technology and operations increase operating efficiency, those high gross margins will eventually translate into high profit margins.\nPardon the disruption\nBill.com has more than 100,000 customers, up nearly 30% from the previous year. While this is a very competitive space,Bill.com is a disruptor, and there is a huge market opportunity. As my Foolish colleagues Jason Moser and Matthew Frankel pointed out in a recent podcast, there are 20 million small- and mid-sized businesses and an addressable market of $30 billion globally, including $9 billion in the U.S.\nBut founder and CEO Rene Lacerte thinks of the fintech not just in terms of customers, but of the network of 2.5 million \"members,\" including the users and partners of all of its clients. \"We believe we are the leading digital B2B payments platform for SMBs (small and mid-sized businesses) and operate one of the largest B2B networks in the United States,\" Lacerte said on the most recent earnings call. That is a huge network of users on which to grow. The bigger the network, the more potential value it has for its members. Also, this growth allows Bill.com the opportunity to form deeper relationships with those on the network, offering additional products and services.\nBill.com's other potential competitive advantage is its AI, which gets more intuitive and robust the more customers it gets and the more data it gathers. The better the AI, the more efficient, convenient and useful the service becomes.\nThis is a young, disruptive company that's in growth mode, with a low-expense business model and high earnings potential, that will soon be profitable. If you are looking for a growth stock with long-term potential, this Cathie Wood stock -- one she has identified as a fintech innovator -- would not be a bad choice.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ARKG":0.9,"BILL":0.9,"ARKK":0.9,"ARKW":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1239,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":383691768,"gmtCreate":1612870803654,"gmtModify":1703766062024,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GSMG\">$Glory Star New Media Group Limited(GSMG)$</a>Let’s do it&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GSMG\">$Glory Star New Media Group Limited(GSMG)$</a>Let’s do it&nbsp;","text":"$Glory Star New Media Group Limited(GSMG)$Let’s do it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/383691768","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":337,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":161491678,"gmtCreate":1623937371194,"gmtModify":1634025635337,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/161491678","repostId":"2144174158","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2283,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349701674,"gmtCreate":1617635505598,"gmtModify":1634297395537,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/349701674","repostId":"2125765056","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1684,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340450298,"gmtCreate":1617459400014,"gmtModify":1634520879342,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340450298","repostId":"2124875875","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340948488,"gmtCreate":1617333935344,"gmtModify":1634521361612,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340948488","repostId":"1102765777","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2505,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322687074,"gmtCreate":1615803140898,"gmtModify":1703493187476,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322687074","repostId":"1169830276","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":578,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":364611873,"gmtCreate":1614846149992,"gmtModify":1703481863859,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>惨","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>惨","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$惨","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/364611873","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1013,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":341658234,"gmtCreate":1617810497828,"gmtModify":1634296360872,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmmm","listText":"Hmmmmm","text":"Hmmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/341658234","repostId":"2125872814","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1762,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355955043,"gmtCreate":1617025834382,"gmtModify":1634523066277,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355955043","repostId":"1155390932","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359779069,"gmtCreate":1616426468651,"gmtModify":1634525863800,"author":{"id":"3573442142945386","authorId":"3573442142945386","name":"VivalaRan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbdf1f2a57583bc2d6a9cae2d7c9b451","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573442142945386","authorIdStr":"3573442142945386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359779069","repostId":"1115438167","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115438167","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1616423750,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1115438167?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-22 22:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Some “meme” stocks are slipping<blockquote>一些“模因”股票正在下滑</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115438167","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some “meme” stocks are slipping in Monday trading,AMC Entertainment stock fall 13%,the shares of Sundial Growers drop 7%,GameStop Corp. stock is down 2%.These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days ","content":"<p>Some&nbsp;“meme”&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;are&nbsp;slipping&nbsp;in&nbsp;Monday&nbsp;trading,AMC&nbsp;Entertainment&nbsp;stock&nbsp;fall&nbsp;13%,the&nbsp;shares&nbsp;of&nbsp;Sundial&nbsp;Growers&nbsp;drop&nbsp;7%,GameStop&nbsp;Corp.&nbsp;stock&nbsp;is&nbsp;down&nbsp;2%.</p><p><blockquote>一些“模因”股票在周一交易中下跌，AMC Entertainment股票下跌13%，Sundial Growers股票下跌7%，游戏驿站公司股票下跌2%。</blockquote></p><p>These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks.</p><p><blockquote>使用迈阿密大学的Alok Kumar、岘港大学的Houng Nguyen以及悉尼科技大学和斯德哥尔摩经济学院的Talis Putnins最近发表的研究论文中的方法，这些股票被确定为潜在的赌博。该小组建议将30天内的平均交易量与市值进行比较，以此来确定他们所谓的彩票股票。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de78ffef1bc7540f75fca0332d31e69c\" tg-width=\"371\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Some “meme” stocks are slipping<blockquote>一些“模因”股票正在下滑</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSome “meme” stocks are slipping<blockquote>一些“模因”股票正在下滑</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-03-22 22:35</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some&nbsp;“meme”&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;are&nbsp;slipping&nbsp;in&nbsp;Monday&nbsp;trading,AMC&nbsp;Entertainment&nbsp;stock&nbsp;fall&nbsp;13%,the&nbsp;shares&nbsp;of&nbsp;Sundial&nbsp;Growers&nbsp;drop&nbsp;7%,GameStop&nbsp;Corp.&nbsp;stock&nbsp;is&nbsp;down&nbsp;2%.</p><p><blockquote>一些“模因”股票在周一交易中下跌，AMC Entertainment股票下跌13%，Sundial Growers股票下跌7%，游戏驿站公司股票下跌2%。</blockquote></p><p>These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks.</p><p><blockquote>使用迈阿密大学的Alok Kumar、岘港大学的Houng Nguyen以及悉尼科技大学和斯德哥尔摩经济学院的Talis Putnins最近发表的研究论文中的方法，这些股票被确定为潜在的赌博。该小组建议将30天内的平均交易量与市值进行比较，以此来确定他们所谓的彩票股票。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de78ffef1bc7540f75fca0332d31e69c\" tg-width=\"371\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站","SNDL":"SNDL Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115438167","content_text":"Some “meme” stocks are slipping in Monday trading,AMC Entertainment stock fall 13%,the shares of Sundial Growers drop 7%,GameStop Corp. stock is down 2%.These stocks are identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NAKD":0.9,"AMC":0.9,"GME":0.9,"SNDL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":577,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}