Check7mate7的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Check7mate7

Check7mate7

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

627关注

14粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-04-11

Bump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-04

Bump

Li Auto Bumped Up April Deliveries. What That Bigger Number Means for Investors<blockquote>理想汽车增加了4月份的交付量。更大的数字对投资者意味着什么</blockquote>

2021-06-01

Pump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-08

$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Nicely uptrend

2021-06-16

Bump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-17

Bump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-22

Up

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-05

Bump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-11

Bump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-18

Bump

$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move<blockquote>5440亿美元期权今天到期：以下是将发生的变化</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573551446689524","uuid":"3573551446689524","gmtCreate":1610490067305,"gmtModify":1612615465987,"name":"Check7mate7","pinyin":"check7mate7","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":14,"headSize":627,"tweetSize":227,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"93.77%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.11%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":609677594,"gmtCreate":1638283688817,"gmtModify":1638283688904,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609677594","repostId":"1126936349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126936349","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626853497,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126936349?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 15:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126936349","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this ","content":"<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 15:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126936349","content_text":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\nWell, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:\n\n I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).\n\n\n Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.\n\nEarlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.\nIf Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2733,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":609677961,"gmtCreate":1638283665485,"gmtModify":1638283665575,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ip","listText":"Ip","text":"Ip","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609677961","repostId":"1126936349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126936349","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626853497,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126936349?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 15:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126936349","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this ","content":"<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 15:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126936349","content_text":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\nWell, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:\n\n I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).\n\n\n Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.\n\nEarlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.\nIf Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2455,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":609674345,"gmtCreate":1638283623168,"gmtModify":1638283623304,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609674345","repostId":"2150370120","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4219,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":609675721,"gmtCreate":1638283611994,"gmtModify":1638283612095,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609675721","repostId":"2150370120","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2842,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":872163959,"gmtCreate":1637459553113,"gmtModify":1637459553204,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872163959","repostId":"1126936349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126936349","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626853497,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126936349?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 15:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126936349","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this ","content":"<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 15:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126936349","content_text":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\nWell, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:\n\n I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).\n\n\n Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.\n\nEarlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.\nIf Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2934,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":876675995,"gmtCreate":1637313213709,"gmtModify":1637313213808,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/876675995","repostId":"1126936349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126936349","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626853497,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126936349?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 15:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126936349","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this ","content":"<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 15:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126936349","content_text":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\nWell, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:\n\n I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).\n\n\n Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.\n\nEarlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.\nIf Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3167,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":879669492,"gmtCreate":1636718152620,"gmtModify":1636718152712,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879669492","repostId":"2150370120","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2442,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":870718078,"gmtCreate":1636646739895,"gmtModify":1636646938704,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/870718078","repostId":"2150370120","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2731,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":845396070,"gmtCreate":1636277873151,"gmtModify":1636277873401,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845396070","repostId":"1126936349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126936349","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626853497,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126936349?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 15:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126936349","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this ","content":"<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 15:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126936349","content_text":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\nWell, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:\n\n I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).\n\n\n Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.\n\nEarlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.\nIf Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2629,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":852517940,"gmtCreate":1635291113893,"gmtModify":1635291114579,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/852517940","repostId":"1126936349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126936349","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626853497,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126936349?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 15:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126936349","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this ","content":"<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 15:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126936349","content_text":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\nWell, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:\n\n I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).\n\n\n Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.\n\nEarlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.\nIf Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2477,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":852058192,"gmtCreate":1635226619341,"gmtModify":1635226619641,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/852058192","repostId":"2177412181","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2177412181","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1635219132,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2177412181?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-26 11:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD earnings look to again succeed where Intel disappointed<blockquote>AMD盈利有望在英特尔失望的地方再次取得成功</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2177412181","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"AMD earnings preview: After showing data-center gains as Intel declined two quarters in a row, analy","content":"<p>AMD earnings preview: After showing data-center gains as Intel declined two quarters in a row, analysts now point to AMD's growing margins as Intel's are projected to shrink</p><p><blockquote>AMD盈利预览：在英特尔连续两个季度下滑后，分析师现在指出，由于英特尔的利润率预计将萎缩，AMD的利润率将不断增长</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/30ec3c9220844c561016f0de86f86f52\" tg-width=\"699\" tg-height=\"394\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Advanced Micro Devices Inc.’s growing series of Epyc server chips has been the talk of Wall Street in recent quarters, but that may switch to gross margins in this quarter’s earnings report.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Advanced Micro Devices Inc.不断增长的Epyc服务器芯片系列最近几个季度一直是华尔街的热门话题，但在本季度的收益报告中，这可能会转向毛利率。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Advanced Micro Devices Inc. is set to follow yet another rough earnings report from Intel Corp., and once again could show gains in an area that caused pain for its larger rival.</p><p><blockquote>超微设备公司（Advanced Micro Devices Inc.）将紧随英特尔公司（Intel Corp.）发布另一份粗略的收益报告，并可能再次在给其规模更大的竞争对手带来痛苦的领域显示收益。</blockquote></p><p> AMD&nbsp;is scheduled to report third-quarter earnings on Tuesday after the close of markets, after Intel&nbsp;reported an earnings beat Thursday that hardly mattered as revenue came in light. More important to analysts was Intel's forecast for declining margins over the next few years as its chief executive doubles down on new manufacturing capacity to try to retake its former glory as the undisputed chip leader.</p><p><blockquote>AMD定于周二收盘后公布第三季度收益，此前英特尔周四公布的收益超出预期，但随着收入的公布，这几乎无关紧要。对分析师来说，更重要的是英特尔预测未来几年利润率将下降，因为其首席执行官加倍投资新的制造能力，试图重新夺回其作为无可争议的芯片领导者的昔日荣耀。</blockquote></p><p> That led to downgrades on Friday and Intel's worst one-day performance since the chip leader said it was going to delay its next generation of chips, an announcement that had fired up even more investor support for AMD back then.</p><p><blockquote>这导致了周五的评级下调，以及英特尔自这家芯片领导者表示将推迟下一代芯片以来最糟糕的单日表现，这一声明当时引发了更多投资者对AMD的支持。</blockquote></p><p> Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon, who has a market perform rating on AMD and a $110 price target, said AMD will continue to benefit from Intel's transition, and called attention to an AMD metric that was one of enormous concern during Intel's call: Gross margins.</p><p><blockquote>Bernstein分析师Stacy Rasgon对AMD给予市场表现评级，目标价为110美元，她表示AMD将继续受益于英特尔的转型，并呼吁人们关注英特尔看涨期权期间备受关注的AMD指标之一：毛利率。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe Street gross margin estimates appear unaggressive going forward (which is not something we have typically said for AMD), and the company is now (for the first time ever) starting to return cash,\" Rasgon said.</p><p><blockquote>拉斯贡表示：“我们认为，未来华尔街的毛利率预期似乎并不激进（这不是我们通常对AMD所说的），该公司现在（有史以来第一次）开始返还现金。”</blockquote></p><p> That underscores another show of how Intel and AMD are transitioning with respect to one another: Analysts on the Intel call were very concerned that Intel's margins were falling despite company assurances they would stay just above 50% for the next few years. Meanwhile, AMD gross margins have been rising, and are likely to break above 50%, if not in this earnings report, then sometime soon. Three months ago, AMD reported gross margins of 48%, up from 44% in the previous year.</p><p><blockquote>这再次凸显了英特尔和AMD如何相互转型：英特尔看涨期权上的分析师非常担心英特尔的利润率正在下降，尽管该公司保证未来几年利润率将保持在50%以上。与此同时，AMD的毛利率一直在上升，很可能会突破50%，如果不是在这份收益报告中，那么很快就会突破50%。三个月前，AMD公布的毛利率为48%，高于上一年的44%。</blockquote></p><p> While AMD is referred to as Intel's \"smaller rival,\" that gap has been steadily closing for a while now. At Friday's close, AMD had a market cap of $145.34 billion, or nearly 73% of Intel's $200.66 billion. Just this past summer, AMD's $111.5 billion valuation was a little more than half Intel's $219.5 billion cap.</p><p><blockquote>虽然AMD被称为英特尔的“较小竞争对手”，但这一差距已经稳步缩小了一段时间。截至周五收盘，AMD市值为1453.4亿美元，占英特尔2006.6亿美元市值的近73%。就在去年夏天，AMD 1115亿美元的估值略高于英特尔2195亿美元上限的一半。</blockquote></p><p> One other are to look at will be data-center sales, as finally swung to a gain in that important segment in the quarter. Over the past two quarters, Intel has posted significant year-over-year declines in the increasingly important category, while AMD has more than doubled its sales. That raises the question whether Intel clawed back some market share, or whether data-center sales were just generally better all around, which AMD's report could answer.</p><p><blockquote>另一个值得关注的是数据中心销售，该销售最终在本季度实现了增长。在过去的两个季度中，英特尔在这一日益重要的类别中的销售额同比大幅下降，而AMD的销售额则增长了一倍多。这就提出了一个问题：英特尔是否夺回了一些市场份额，或者数据中心的销售是否总体上更好，AMD的报告可以回答这个问题。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What to expect</b></p><p><blockquote><b>期待什么</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Earnings: </b>Of the 34 analysts surveyed by FactSet, AMD on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of 66 cents a share, up from 41 cents a share reported in the year-ago period. Estimize, a software platform that crowdsources estimates from hedge-fund executives, brokerages, buy-side analysts and others, calls for earnings of 72 cents a share.</p><p><blockquote><b>收益：</b>在FactSet调查的34名分析师中，AMD平均预计调整后每股收益为66美分，高于去年同期的每股41美分。Estimize是一个软件平台，众包对冲基金高管、券商、买方分析师和其他人对评级每股收益72美分的估计。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Revenue:</b> Of the 32 analysts polled by FactSet, AMD, on average, is expected to post revenue of $4.11 billion, up from the $2.8 billion reported in the year-ago quarter. AMD had forecast $4 billion to $4.2 billion. Estimize expects revenue of $4.22 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b>收入：</b>在FactSet调查的32名分析师中，AMD平均预计营收为41.1亿美元，高于去年同期的28亿美元。AMD此前预测为40亿至42亿美元。Estimize预计营收为42.2亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stock movement:</b> While AMD earnings and sales have both topped Wall Street estimates over the past five quarterly reports, but shares only gained the next day twice, about three months ago and when the stock popped nearly 13% five quarters ago.</p><p><blockquote><b>股票变动：</b>尽管AMD在过去五份季度报告中的盈利和销售额均超出了华尔街的预期，但该股仅在第二天上涨了两次，分别是大约三个月前和五个季度前该股上涨了近13%。</blockquote></p><p> AMD shares rose 9.6% in the third quarter. In contrast, the PHLX Semiconductor Index declined 2.6%, the S&amp;P 500 index rose 0.2%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index declined 0.4%. On Friday, the day after Intel's report, AMD shares closed at a record high of $119.82.</p><p><blockquote>AMD股价第三季度上涨9.6%。相比之下，PHLX半导体指数下跌2.6%，标普500指数上涨0.2%，以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌0.4%。周五，也就是英特尔发布报告的第二天，AMD股价收于119.82美元的历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What analysts are saying</b></p><p><blockquote><b>分析师怎么说</b></blockquote></p><p> Cowen analyst Matthew Ramsay, who has an outperform rating and a $120 price target on AMD, said he's \"lookin' for more of the same.\"</p><p><blockquote>Cowen分析师马修·拉姆齐(Matthew Ramsay)对AMD给予跑赢大盘评级，目标价为120美元，他表示“正在寻找更多同样的结果”。</blockquote></p><p> \"We continue to monitor the PC market for signs of demand slowing or supply improving,\" Ramsay said. \"Near-term, we see resilient demand outside Chromebooks, but prefer a prudent/agnostic view on 2022 like AMD took on its last call.\"</p><p><blockquote>Ramsay表示：“我们将继续关注PC市场，寻找需求放缓或供应改善的迹象。”“短期内，我们看到Chromebook以外的需求具有弹性，但更倾向于对2022年采取谨慎/不可知论的观点，就像AMD在上一次看涨期权中采取的那样。”</blockquote></p><p> Earlier in the month, research firms released data showing that pandemic-fueled growth in PC shipments had slowed considerably as the world not only wrestles with a chip shortage but overall supply-chain issues.</p><p><blockquote>本月早些时候，研究公司发布的数据显示，疫情推动的个人电脑出货量增长已大幅放缓，因为世界不仅面临芯片短缺问题，还面临整体供应链问题。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> On data-center sales, Ramsay is even more optimistic estimating that segment will account for more than 25% of sales compared with less than 20% a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>在数据中心销售额方面，Ramsay更加乐观地估计该细分市场将占销售额的25%以上，而一年前这一比例还不到20%。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe datacenter passing a quarter of AMD's business could draw investor attention,\" Ramsay said. \"We remind investors that the most important business for AMD remains datacenter, which we estimate doubled in 2020, with CEO Lisa Su noting she sees the business momentum accelerating in 2021.\"</p><p><blockquote>拉姆齐表示：“我们相信数据中心超过AMD四分之一的业务可能会引起投资者的关注。”“我们提醒投资者，AMD最重要的业务仍然是数据中心，我们估计该业务在2020年翻了一番，首席执行官Lisa Su指出，她预计2021年业务势头将加速。”</blockquote></p><p> Susquehanna Financial analyst Christopher Rolland, who has a positive rating and a $130 price target on AMD, said he expects another solid quarter driven by enterprise and server sales, but that \"given the slowing PC market, we do not expect mgmt to raise their FY top-line guidance as they have done in numerous updates over the last year.\"</p><p><blockquote>Susquehanna Financial分析师Christopher Rolland对AMD给予正面评级，目标价为130美元，他表示，他预计企业和服务器销售将推动另一个稳健的季度，但“鉴于PC市场放缓，我们预计管理层不会提高他们的财务业绩。”正如他们在去年的多次更新中所做的那样，顶线指导。”</blockquote></p><p> Still, Rolland expects AMD to report share gains from Intel in both desktop and laptop PCs as well as enterprise and gaming PCs.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，魅兰预计AMD在台式机和笔记本电脑以及企业级和游戏PC领域的份额将从英特尔增长。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 39 analysts who cover AMD, 23 have buy or overweight ratings, and 16 have hold ratings, with an average price target of $117.55.</p><p><blockquote>在关注AMD的39名分析师中，23名分析师给予买入或跑赢大盘评级，16名分析师给予持有评级，平均目标价为117.55美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD earnings look to again succeed where Intel disappointed<blockquote>AMD盈利有望在英特尔失望的地方再次取得成功</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD earnings look to again succeed where Intel disappointed<blockquote>AMD盈利有望在英特尔失望的地方再次取得成功</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-26 11:32</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>AMD earnings preview: After showing data-center gains as Intel declined two quarters in a row, analysts now point to AMD's growing margins as Intel's are projected to shrink</p><p><blockquote>AMD盈利预览：在英特尔连续两个季度下滑后，分析师现在指出，由于英特尔的利润率预计将萎缩，AMD的利润率将不断增长</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/30ec3c9220844c561016f0de86f86f52\" tg-width=\"699\" tg-height=\"394\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Advanced Micro Devices Inc.’s growing series of Epyc server chips has been the talk of Wall Street in recent quarters, but that may switch to gross margins in this quarter’s earnings report.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Advanced Micro Devices Inc.不断增长的Epyc服务器芯片系列最近几个季度一直是华尔街的热门话题，但在本季度的收益报告中，这可能会转向毛利率。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Advanced Micro Devices Inc. is set to follow yet another rough earnings report from Intel Corp., and once again could show gains in an area that caused pain for its larger rival.</p><p><blockquote>超微设备公司（Advanced Micro Devices Inc.）将紧随英特尔公司（Intel Corp.）发布另一份粗略的收益报告，并可能再次在给其规模更大的竞争对手带来痛苦的领域显示收益。</blockquote></p><p> AMD&nbsp;is scheduled to report third-quarter earnings on Tuesday after the close of markets, after Intel&nbsp;reported an earnings beat Thursday that hardly mattered as revenue came in light. More important to analysts was Intel's forecast for declining margins over the next few years as its chief executive doubles down on new manufacturing capacity to try to retake its former glory as the undisputed chip leader.</p><p><blockquote>AMD定于周二收盘后公布第三季度收益，此前英特尔周四公布的收益超出预期，但随着收入的公布，这几乎无关紧要。对分析师来说，更重要的是英特尔预测未来几年利润率将下降，因为其首席执行官加倍投资新的制造能力，试图重新夺回其作为无可争议的芯片领导者的昔日荣耀。</blockquote></p><p> That led to downgrades on Friday and Intel's worst one-day performance since the chip leader said it was going to delay its next generation of chips, an announcement that had fired up even more investor support for AMD back then.</p><p><blockquote>这导致了周五的评级下调，以及英特尔自这家芯片领导者表示将推迟下一代芯片以来最糟糕的单日表现，这一声明当时引发了更多投资者对AMD的支持。</blockquote></p><p> Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon, who has a market perform rating on AMD and a $110 price target, said AMD will continue to benefit from Intel's transition, and called attention to an AMD metric that was one of enormous concern during Intel's call: Gross margins.</p><p><blockquote>Bernstein分析师Stacy Rasgon对AMD给予市场表现评级，目标价为110美元，她表示AMD将继续受益于英特尔的转型，并呼吁人们关注英特尔看涨期权期间备受关注的AMD指标之一：毛利率。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe Street gross margin estimates appear unaggressive going forward (which is not something we have typically said for AMD), and the company is now (for the first time ever) starting to return cash,\" Rasgon said.</p><p><blockquote>拉斯贡表示：“我们认为，未来华尔街的毛利率预期似乎并不激进（这不是我们通常对AMD所说的），该公司现在（有史以来第一次）开始返还现金。”</blockquote></p><p> That underscores another show of how Intel and AMD are transitioning with respect to one another: Analysts on the Intel call were very concerned that Intel's margins were falling despite company assurances they would stay just above 50% for the next few years. Meanwhile, AMD gross margins have been rising, and are likely to break above 50%, if not in this earnings report, then sometime soon. Three months ago, AMD reported gross margins of 48%, up from 44% in the previous year.</p><p><blockquote>这再次凸显了英特尔和AMD如何相互转型：英特尔看涨期权上的分析师非常担心英特尔的利润率正在下降，尽管该公司保证未来几年利润率将保持在50%以上。与此同时，AMD的毛利率一直在上升，很可能会突破50%，如果不是在这份收益报告中，那么很快就会突破50%。三个月前，AMD公布的毛利率为48%，高于上一年的44%。</blockquote></p><p> While AMD is referred to as Intel's \"smaller rival,\" that gap has been steadily closing for a while now. At Friday's close, AMD had a market cap of $145.34 billion, or nearly 73% of Intel's $200.66 billion. Just this past summer, AMD's $111.5 billion valuation was a little more than half Intel's $219.5 billion cap.</p><p><blockquote>虽然AMD被称为英特尔的“较小竞争对手”，但这一差距已经稳步缩小了一段时间。截至周五收盘，AMD市值为1453.4亿美元，占英特尔2006.6亿美元市值的近73%。就在去年夏天，AMD 1115亿美元的估值略高于英特尔2195亿美元上限的一半。</blockquote></p><p> One other are to look at will be data-center sales, as finally swung to a gain in that important segment in the quarter. Over the past two quarters, Intel has posted significant year-over-year declines in the increasingly important category, while AMD has more than doubled its sales. That raises the question whether Intel clawed back some market share, or whether data-center sales were just generally better all around, which AMD's report could answer.</p><p><blockquote>另一个值得关注的是数据中心销售，该销售最终在本季度实现了增长。在过去的两个季度中，英特尔在这一日益重要的类别中的销售额同比大幅下降，而AMD的销售额则增长了一倍多。这就提出了一个问题：英特尔是否夺回了一些市场份额，或者数据中心的销售是否总体上更好，AMD的报告可以回答这个问题。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What to expect</b></p><p><blockquote><b>期待什么</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Earnings: </b>Of the 34 analysts surveyed by FactSet, AMD on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of 66 cents a share, up from 41 cents a share reported in the year-ago period. Estimize, a software platform that crowdsources estimates from hedge-fund executives, brokerages, buy-side analysts and others, calls for earnings of 72 cents a share.</p><p><blockquote><b>收益：</b>在FactSet调查的34名分析师中，AMD平均预计调整后每股收益为66美分，高于去年同期的每股41美分。Estimize是一个软件平台，众包对冲基金高管、券商、买方分析师和其他人对评级每股收益72美分的估计。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Revenue:</b> Of the 32 analysts polled by FactSet, AMD, on average, is expected to post revenue of $4.11 billion, up from the $2.8 billion reported in the year-ago quarter. AMD had forecast $4 billion to $4.2 billion. Estimize expects revenue of $4.22 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b>收入：</b>在FactSet调查的32名分析师中，AMD平均预计营收为41.1亿美元，高于去年同期的28亿美元。AMD此前预测为40亿至42亿美元。Estimize预计营收为42.2亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stock movement:</b> While AMD earnings and sales have both topped Wall Street estimates over the past five quarterly reports, but shares only gained the next day twice, about three months ago and when the stock popped nearly 13% five quarters ago.</p><p><blockquote><b>股票变动：</b>尽管AMD在过去五份季度报告中的盈利和销售额均超出了华尔街的预期，但该股仅在第二天上涨了两次，分别是大约三个月前和五个季度前该股上涨了近13%。</blockquote></p><p> AMD shares rose 9.6% in the third quarter. In contrast, the PHLX Semiconductor Index declined 2.6%, the S&amp;P 500 index rose 0.2%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index declined 0.4%. On Friday, the day after Intel's report, AMD shares closed at a record high of $119.82.</p><p><blockquote>AMD股价第三季度上涨9.6%。相比之下，PHLX半导体指数下跌2.6%，标普500指数上涨0.2%，以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌0.4%。周五，也就是英特尔发布报告的第二天，AMD股价收于119.82美元的历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What analysts are saying</b></p><p><blockquote><b>分析师怎么说</b></blockquote></p><p> Cowen analyst Matthew Ramsay, who has an outperform rating and a $120 price target on AMD, said he's \"lookin' for more of the same.\"</p><p><blockquote>Cowen分析师马修·拉姆齐(Matthew Ramsay)对AMD给予跑赢大盘评级，目标价为120美元，他表示“正在寻找更多同样的结果”。</blockquote></p><p> \"We continue to monitor the PC market for signs of demand slowing or supply improving,\" Ramsay said. \"Near-term, we see resilient demand outside Chromebooks, but prefer a prudent/agnostic view on 2022 like AMD took on its last call.\"</p><p><blockquote>Ramsay表示：“我们将继续关注PC市场，寻找需求放缓或供应改善的迹象。”“短期内，我们看到Chromebook以外的需求具有弹性，但更倾向于对2022年采取谨慎/不可知论的观点，就像AMD在上一次看涨期权中采取的那样。”</blockquote></p><p> Earlier in the month, research firms released data showing that pandemic-fueled growth in PC shipments had slowed considerably as the world not only wrestles with a chip shortage but overall supply-chain issues.</p><p><blockquote>本月早些时候，研究公司发布的数据显示，疫情推动的个人电脑出货量增长已大幅放缓，因为世界不仅面临芯片短缺问题，还面临整体供应链问题。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> On data-center sales, Ramsay is even more optimistic estimating that segment will account for more than 25% of sales compared with less than 20% a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>在数据中心销售额方面，Ramsay更加乐观地估计该细分市场将占销售额的25%以上，而一年前这一比例还不到20%。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe datacenter passing a quarter of AMD's business could draw investor attention,\" Ramsay said. \"We remind investors that the most important business for AMD remains datacenter, which we estimate doubled in 2020, with CEO Lisa Su noting she sees the business momentum accelerating in 2021.\"</p><p><blockquote>拉姆齐表示：“我们相信数据中心超过AMD四分之一的业务可能会引起投资者的关注。”“我们提醒投资者，AMD最重要的业务仍然是数据中心，我们估计该业务在2020年翻了一番，首席执行官Lisa Su指出，她预计2021年业务势头将加速。”</blockquote></p><p> Susquehanna Financial analyst Christopher Rolland, who has a positive rating and a $130 price target on AMD, said he expects another solid quarter driven by enterprise and server sales, but that \"given the slowing PC market, we do not expect mgmt to raise their FY top-line guidance as they have done in numerous updates over the last year.\"</p><p><blockquote>Susquehanna Financial分析师Christopher Rolland对AMD给予正面评级，目标价为130美元，他表示，他预计企业和服务器销售将推动另一个稳健的季度，但“鉴于PC市场放缓，我们预计管理层不会提高他们的财务业绩。”正如他们在去年的多次更新中所做的那样，顶线指导。”</blockquote></p><p> Still, Rolland expects AMD to report share gains from Intel in both desktop and laptop PCs as well as enterprise and gaming PCs.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，魅兰预计AMD在台式机和笔记本电脑以及企业级和游戏PC领域的份额将从英特尔增长。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 39 analysts who cover AMD, 23 have buy or overweight ratings, and 16 have hold ratings, with an average price target of $117.55.</p><p><blockquote>在关注AMD的39名分析师中，23名分析师给予买入或跑赢大盘评级，16名分析师给予持有评级，平均目标价为117.55美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amd-earnings-look-to-again-succeed-where-intel-disappointed-11634942264?mod=mw_quote_news\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amd-earnings-look-to-again-succeed-where-intel-disappointed-11634942264?mod=mw_quote_news","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2177412181","content_text":"AMD earnings preview: After showing data-center gains as Intel declined two quarters in a row, analysts now point to AMD's growing margins as Intel's are projected to shrink\nAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.’s growing series of Epyc server chips has been the talk of Wall Street in recent quarters, but that may switch to gross margins in this quarter’s earnings report.\nAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. is set to follow yet another rough earnings report from Intel Corp., and once again could show gains in an area that caused pain for its larger rival.\nAMD is scheduled to report third-quarter earnings on Tuesday after the close of markets, after Intel reported an earnings beat Thursday that hardly mattered as revenue came in light. More important to analysts was Intel's forecast for declining margins over the next few years as its chief executive doubles down on new manufacturing capacity to try to retake its former glory as the undisputed chip leader.\nThat led to downgrades on Friday and Intel's worst one-day performance since the chip leader said it was going to delay its next generation of chips, an announcement that had fired up even more investor support for AMD back then.\nBernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon, who has a market perform rating on AMD and a $110 price target, said AMD will continue to benefit from Intel's transition, and called attention to an AMD metric that was one of enormous concern during Intel's call: Gross margins.\n\"We believe Street gross margin estimates appear unaggressive going forward (which is not something we have typically said for AMD), and the company is now (for the first time ever) starting to return cash,\" Rasgon said.\nThat underscores another show of how Intel and AMD are transitioning with respect to one another: Analysts on the Intel call were very concerned that Intel's margins were falling despite company assurances they would stay just above 50% for the next few years. Meanwhile, AMD gross margins have been rising, and are likely to break above 50%, if not in this earnings report, then sometime soon. Three months ago, AMD reported gross margins of 48%, up from 44% in the previous year.\nWhile AMD is referred to as Intel's \"smaller rival,\" that gap has been steadily closing for a while now. At Friday's close, AMD had a market cap of $145.34 billion, or nearly 73% of Intel's $200.66 billion. Just this past summer, AMD's $111.5 billion valuation was a little more than half Intel's $219.5 billion cap.\nOne other are to look at will be data-center sales, as finally swung to a gain in that important segment in the quarter. Over the past two quarters, Intel has posted significant year-over-year declines in the increasingly important category, while AMD has more than doubled its sales. That raises the question whether Intel clawed back some market share, or whether data-center sales were just generally better all around, which AMD's report could answer.\nWhat to expect\nEarnings: Of the 34 analysts surveyed by FactSet, AMD on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of 66 cents a share, up from 41 cents a share reported in the year-ago period. Estimize, a software platform that crowdsources estimates from hedge-fund executives, brokerages, buy-side analysts and others, calls for earnings of 72 cents a share.\nRevenue: Of the 32 analysts polled by FactSet, AMD, on average, is expected to post revenue of $4.11 billion, up from the $2.8 billion reported in the year-ago quarter. AMD had forecast $4 billion to $4.2 billion. Estimize expects revenue of $4.22 billion.\nStock movement: While AMD earnings and sales have both topped Wall Street estimates over the past five quarterly reports, but shares only gained the next day twice, about three months ago and when the stock popped nearly 13% five quarters ago.\nAMD shares rose 9.6% in the third quarter. In contrast, the PHLX Semiconductor Index declined 2.6%, the S&P 500 index rose 0.2%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index declined 0.4%. On Friday, the day after Intel's report, AMD shares closed at a record high of $119.82.\nWhat analysts are saying\nCowen analyst Matthew Ramsay, who has an outperform rating and a $120 price target on AMD, said he's \"lookin' for more of the same.\"\n\"We continue to monitor the PC market for signs of demand slowing or supply improving,\" Ramsay said. \"Near-term, we see resilient demand outside Chromebooks, but prefer a prudent/agnostic view on 2022 like AMD took on its last call.\"\nEarlier in the month, research firms released data showing that pandemic-fueled growth in PC shipments had slowed considerably as the world not only wrestles with a chip shortage but overall supply-chain issues.\nOn data-center sales, Ramsay is even more optimistic estimating that segment will account for more than 25% of sales compared with less than 20% a year ago.\n\"We believe datacenter passing a quarter of AMD's business could draw investor attention,\" Ramsay said. \"We remind investors that the most important business for AMD remains datacenter, which we estimate doubled in 2020, with CEO Lisa Su noting she sees the business momentum accelerating in 2021.\"\nSusquehanna Financial analyst Christopher Rolland, who has a positive rating and a $130 price target on AMD, said he expects another solid quarter driven by enterprise and server sales, but that \"given the slowing PC market, we do not expect mgmt to raise their FY top-line guidance as they have done in numerous updates over the last year.\"\nStill, Rolland expects AMD to report share gains from Intel in both desktop and laptop PCs as well as enterprise and gaming PCs.\nOf the 39 analysts who cover AMD, 23 have buy or overweight ratings, and 16 have hold ratings, with an average price target of $117.55.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":759,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851959913,"gmtCreate":1634865581322,"gmtModify":1634866375096,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851959913","repostId":"2177462128","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851950941,"gmtCreate":1634865536247,"gmtModify":1634866374251,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851950941","repostId":"1120249852","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":656,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":850643230,"gmtCreate":1634598980146,"gmtModify":1634598980456,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850643230","repostId":"2176012023","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2176012023","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1634592645,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2176012023?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 05:30","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"外媒头条：华尔街狼王警告美股将因大肆印钞而碰壁","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2176012023","media":"新浪美股","summary":"　　激进投资者、“华尔街狼王”卡尔-伊坎 周一表示，从长远来看，美股市场可能面临货币供应过剩和通胀上升的重大挑战。　　美联储和国会已经释放了数万亿美元的刺激措施，以将经济从新冠疫情拯救出来。在开放式量化宽松计划中，美联储的资产负债表膨胀了超过3万亿美元，而美国政府已拨款超过5万亿美元来支持美国人度过危机。　　自他卖出以来，VTI上涨了35%以上。","content":"<p><b>全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>1、“华尔街狼王”<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IKAN\">伊坎</a>：长远来看 美股肯定会因大肆印钞而“碰壁”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>2、美联储主席鲍威尔去年10月卖出价值高达500万美元的股票</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>3、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">高盛</a>警告称月度期权到期加大标普500指数波动</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>4、高盛与<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">摩根大通</a>经济学家预计英国央行将于11月加息</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>5、与华尔街大相径庭 美联储工作人员的预测显示不必担忧通胀上升</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>6、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>MacBook Pro发布 采用自研M1 Pro芯片 有刘海</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/da0f162b15715058cf3b78f3dc54ab06\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"309\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>“华尔街狼王”伊坎：长远来看 美股肯定会因大肆印钞而“碰壁”</b></p>\n<p>激进投资者、“华尔街狼王”卡尔-伊坎（Carl Icahn） 周一表示，从长远来看，美股市场可能面临货币供应过剩和通胀上升的重大挑战。</p>\n<p>“从长远来看，我们肯定会碰壁，”伊坎表示。 “我真的认为，我们前进的方式、印钞的方式、陷入通货胀的方式都会发生危机。如果你环顾四周，你会发现周围到处都是通胀，我不知道从长远来看该如何应对。”</p>\n<p>美联储和国会已经释放了数万亿美元的刺激措施，以将经济从新冠疫情拯救出来。在开放式量化宽松计划中，美联储的资产负债表膨胀了超过3万亿美元，而美国政府已拨款超过5万亿美元来支持美国人度过危机。</p>\n<p>伊坎相信，从长远来看，市场总有一天会为这些政策付出代价。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6f91f86096bb2d1dfae2ad618eebc6b\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"357\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>美联储主席鲍威尔去年10月卖出价值高达500万美元的股票</b></p>\n<p>据报道，美联储主席杰罗姆-鲍威尔（Jerome Powell）去年卖出了价值高达500万美元的大盘指数基金。</p>\n<p>报道称，鲍威尔在向美国政府道德办公室披露时指出，2020年10月，其在先锋旗下股票基金Vanguard Total Stock Market Index（VTI）的卖出金额在100万至500万美元之间。他还在去年进行了其他几笔较小的股票和债券交易。</p>\n<p>虽然报道称鲍威尔在市场“低迷”时卖出，但他是在股市从疫情低点V型复苏之后、回落1.5%之前卖出的。标普指数随后继续走高，创下历史新高。</p>\n<p>自他卖出以来，VTI上涨了35%以上。</p>\n<p>在美联储高级官员持有和交易股票引发外界强烈不满之际，有媒体对美联储官员的财务披露进行了深入调查，发现有三位联储官员去年持有美联储当时正在购买的同一类型资产，这其中就包括鲍威尔。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88e36b08e1e6066f98f41069cf800c03\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"309\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>高盛与摩根大通经济学家预计英国央行将于11月加息</b></p>\n<p>能源价格和通胀飙升双重夹击下，全球市场在震荡中开启本周的交易，两因素结合令本月的交易越发动荡。</p>\n<p>高盛集团警告称，月度期权的到期在最近几个月已经引发了多次市场波动，上周五就有月度期权到期。高盛策略师Vishal Vivek和John Marshall表示，上周的到期规模7，030亿美元，不包括1月份在内，为有记录以来第三高。</p>\n<p>由于期权交易商买卖标的股票以保持中性头寸，一旦期权到期，对冲的需求就会减少。其风险敞口的情况有时会对市场产生巨大影响。</p>\n<p>根据高盛的研究，虽然标普500指数今年在到期日的波动率与疫情前的水平一致，但在月度期权到期后首日交易的波动更大，指数平均波动1%，几乎是2012-2019年期间的两倍。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f525a5d438f0be11d1d3f8acbe082a49\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"401\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>高盛与摩根大通经济学家预计英国央行将于11月加息</b></p>\n<p>在英国央行行长贝利的讲话传达了遏制通胀迫在眉睫的更强烈信号后，全球大型银行的经济学家也跟随投资者做出了今年加息的预测。</p>\n<p>高盛、摩根大通和瑞信都在周一发布的报告中将加息预期提前到11月，同时预测明年将进一步收紧政策。</p>\n<p>贝利周日表示，尽管没有用来应对供应冲击造成的价格压力的货币政策工具，但央行将“不得不采取行动”以防止通胀预期变得根深蒂固。他没有试图压制货币市场对今年加息的激进押注。</p>\n<p>摩根大通驻伦敦经济学家Allan Monks写道，他揣测“行长贝利正试图暗示央行将更快在近期内做出应对，而且知道自己有”货币政策委员会核心成员的支持。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/366949981f3b1dfd57ef310a5306a07f\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>与华尔街大相径庭 美联储工作人员的预测显示不必担忧通胀上升</b></p>\n<p>关于通胀，拥有超过400名博士的美联储经济学家团队向决策者和美国公众传递了这样一条信息：冷静。</p>\n<p>虽然一些美联储官员公开表示对物价上涨感到担心，并且华尔街也提高了通胀预测，但是根据10月13日公布的联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）会议纪要，美联储在华盛顿的工作人员预计，2022年通胀率将回归2%以下。</p>\n<p>这一预测除了低FOMC 2%的长期目标，也不到美联储青睐的通胀指标在8月份4.3%按年增幅的一半。</p>\n<p>“你应该非常重视它，” 前美联储经济学家、Jain Family Institute高级研究员Claudia Sahm表示。“这并不意味着它一定是对的，但这是世界上顶级预测人员”准备的数据。“从长期的角度来看，没有哪个预测机构对短期经济的分析能够比得上美联储。”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15db549a84ced1848a1ef6d3ba1240fb\" tg-width=\"630\" tg-height=\"354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>苹果MacBook Pro发布 采用自研M1 Pro芯片 有刘海</b></p>\n<p>今日苹果举办新品发布会，这也是今年下半年的第二场，因疫情原因，本次发布会依然采用线上发布会的形式。本次发布会，苹果发布了搭载苹果自研M1 Pro芯片的MacBook Pro新品。</p>\n<p>苹果专门针对MacBook Pro推出了专业芯片M1 Pro，据介绍，M1 Pro将内存接口的宽度加倍，具有高达32 GB的统一内存。“M1 Pro 是我们为 Mac 打造的下一款突破性芯片。”苹果Johny Srouji&nbsp;表示。</p>\n<p>在芯片工艺上，M1 Pro芯片采用5nm工艺，具有337亿个晶体管，具有10个CPU内核，以及16 个 GPU 核心，速度达到M1芯片的两倍。据介绍，M1 Max 建立在 M1 Pro 之上，再次以双倍内存接口开始，运行速度高达 400 GB/s，具有&nbsp;64GB统一内存。</p>","source":"sina_us","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>外媒头条：华尔街狼王警告美股将因大肆印钞而碰壁</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n外媒头条：华尔街狼王警告美股将因大肆印钞而碰壁\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-19 05:30 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-10-19/doc-iktzqtyu2215468.shtml><strong>新浪美股</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：\n\n1、“华尔街狼王”伊坎：长远来看 美股肯定会因大肆印钞而“碰壁”\n\n\n2、美联储主席鲍威尔去年10月卖出价值高达500万美元的股票\n\n\n3、高盛警告称月度期权到期加大标普500指数波动\n\n\n4、高盛与摩根大通经济学家预计英国央行将于11月加息\n\n\n5、与华尔街大相径庭 美联储工作人员的预测显示不必担忧通胀上升\n\n\n6、苹果MacBook Pro发布...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-10-19/doc-iktzqtyu2215468.shtml\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/da0f162b15715058cf3b78f3dc54ab06","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF博时","PSQ":"做空纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","OEX":"标普100","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares","GS":"高盛","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares","AAPL":"苹果","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","QLD":"2倍做多纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares",".DJI":"道琼斯","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","QID":"两倍做空纳斯达克指数ETF-ProShares","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-10-19/doc-iktzqtyu2215468.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2176012023","content_text":"全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：\n\n1、“华尔街狼王”伊坎：长远来看 美股肯定会因大肆印钞而“碰壁”\n\n\n2、美联储主席鲍威尔去年10月卖出价值高达500万美元的股票\n\n\n3、高盛警告称月度期权到期加大标普500指数波动\n\n\n4、高盛与摩根大通经济学家预计英国央行将于11月加息\n\n\n5、与华尔街大相径庭 美联储工作人员的预测显示不必担忧通胀上升\n\n\n6、苹果MacBook Pro发布 采用自研M1 Pro芯片 有刘海\n\n\n“华尔街狼王”伊坎：长远来看 美股肯定会因大肆印钞而“碰壁”\n激进投资者、“华尔街狼王”卡尔-伊坎（Carl Icahn） 周一表示，从长远来看，美股市场可能面临货币供应过剩和通胀上升的重大挑战。\n“从长远来看，我们肯定会碰壁，”伊坎表示。 “我真的认为，我们前进的方式、印钞的方式、陷入通货胀的方式都会发生危机。如果你环顾四周，你会发现周围到处都是通胀，我不知道从长远来看该如何应对。”\n美联储和国会已经释放了数万亿美元的刺激措施，以将经济从新冠疫情拯救出来。在开放式量化宽松计划中，美联储的资产负债表膨胀了超过3万亿美元，而美国政府已拨款超过5万亿美元来支持美国人度过危机。\n伊坎相信，从长远来看，市场总有一天会为这些政策付出代价。\n\n美联储主席鲍威尔去年10月卖出价值高达500万美元的股票\n据报道，美联储主席杰罗姆-鲍威尔（Jerome Powell）去年卖出了价值高达500万美元的大盘指数基金。\n报道称，鲍威尔在向美国政府道德办公室披露时指出，2020年10月，其在先锋旗下股票基金Vanguard Total Stock Market Index（VTI）的卖出金额在100万至500万美元之间。他还在去年进行了其他几笔较小的股票和债券交易。\n虽然报道称鲍威尔在市场“低迷”时卖出，但他是在股市从疫情低点V型复苏之后、回落1.5%之前卖出的。标普指数随后继续走高，创下历史新高。\n自他卖出以来，VTI上涨了35%以上。\n在美联储高级官员持有和交易股票引发外界强烈不满之际，有媒体对美联储官员的财务披露进行了深入调查，发现有三位联储官员去年持有美联储当时正在购买的同一类型资产，这其中就包括鲍威尔。\n\n高盛与摩根大通经济学家预计英国央行将于11月加息\n能源价格和通胀飙升双重夹击下，全球市场在震荡中开启本周的交易，两因素结合令本月的交易越发动荡。\n高盛集团警告称，月度期权的到期在最近几个月已经引发了多次市场波动，上周五就有月度期权到期。高盛策略师Vishal Vivek和John Marshall表示，上周的到期规模7，030亿美元，不包括1月份在内，为有记录以来第三高。\n由于期权交易商买卖标的股票以保持中性头寸，一旦期权到期，对冲的需求就会减少。其风险敞口的情况有时会对市场产生巨大影响。\n根据高盛的研究，虽然标普500指数今年在到期日的波动率与疫情前的水平一致，但在月度期权到期后首日交易的波动更大，指数平均波动1%，几乎是2012-2019年期间的两倍。\n\n高盛与摩根大通经济学家预计英国央行将于11月加息\n在英国央行行长贝利的讲话传达了遏制通胀迫在眉睫的更强烈信号后，全球大型银行的经济学家也跟随投资者做出了今年加息的预测。\n高盛、摩根大通和瑞信都在周一发布的报告中将加息预期提前到11月，同时预测明年将进一步收紧政策。\n贝利周日表示，尽管没有用来应对供应冲击造成的价格压力的货币政策工具，但央行将“不得不采取行动”以防止通胀预期变得根深蒂固。他没有试图压制货币市场对今年加息的激进押注。\n摩根大通驻伦敦经济学家Allan Monks写道，他揣测“行长贝利正试图暗示央行将更快在近期内做出应对，而且知道自己有”货币政策委员会核心成员的支持。\n\n与华尔街大相径庭 美联储工作人员的预测显示不必担忧通胀上升\n关于通胀，拥有超过400名博士的美联储经济学家团队向决策者和美国公众传递了这样一条信息：冷静。\n虽然一些美联储官员公开表示对物价上涨感到担心，并且华尔街也提高了通胀预测，但是根据10月13日公布的联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）会议纪要，美联储在华盛顿的工作人员预计，2022年通胀率将回归2%以下。\n这一预测除了低FOMC 2%的长期目标，也不到美联储青睐的通胀指标在8月份4.3%按年增幅的一半。\n“你应该非常重视它，” 前美联储经济学家、Jain Family Institute高级研究员Claudia Sahm表示。“这并不意味着它一定是对的，但这是世界上顶级预测人员”准备的数据。“从长期的角度来看，没有哪个预测机构对短期经济的分析能够比得上美联储。”\n\n苹果MacBook Pro发布 采用自研M1 Pro芯片 有刘海\n今日苹果举办新品发布会，这也是今年下半年的第二场，因疫情原因，本次发布会依然采用线上发布会的形式。本次发布会，苹果发布了搭载苹果自研M1 Pro芯片的MacBook Pro新品。\n苹果专门针对MacBook Pro推出了专业芯片M1 Pro，据介绍，M1 Pro将内存接口的宽度加倍，具有高达32 GB的统一内存。“M1 Pro 是我们为 Mac 打造的下一款突破性芯片。”苹果Johny Srouji 表示。\n在芯片工艺上，M1 Pro芯片采用5nm工艺，具有337亿个晶体管，具有10个CPU内核，以及16 个 GPU 核心，速度达到M1芯片的两倍。据介绍，M1 Max 建立在 M1 Pro 之上，再次以双倍内存接口开始，运行速度高达 400 GB/s，具有 64GB统一内存。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.9,"513500":0.9,"DXD":0.9,"SPXU":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"OEX":0.9,"TQQQ":0.9,"UDOW":0.9,"ESmain":0.9,"DJX":0.9,"NQmain":0.9,"SH":0.9,"UPRO":0.9,"GS":0.9,"QID":0.9,"OEF":0.9,"SQQQ":0.9,"DOG":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,"DDM":0.9,"SDOW":0.9,"IVV":0.9,"SSO":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"PSQ":0.9,"QQQ":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"MNQmain":0.9,"QLD":0.9,"SDS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1027,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":824144613,"gmtCreate":1634295562614,"gmtModify":1634295562746,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/824144613","repostId":"1126936349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126936349","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626853497,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126936349?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 15:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126936349","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this ","content":"<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Flow Desk: No Institutions Bought Today's Dip<blockquote>高盛流量服务台：没有机构买入今天的逢低买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 15:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"</p><p><blockquote>隔夜，高盛交易员约翰·弗洛德（John Flood）向其机构客户提出了一些建议：“不要逢低买入。”</blockquote></p><p>   I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).  Well, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&amp;P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:</p><p><blockquote>我是一个持续的逢低买入者，但这种波动感觉不同，我正在为本周走弱的磁带做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开，这篇论文越来越难从我的座位上放置（在上周与发行相关的一些波涛汹涌的px行动之后）。嗯，从今天市场的疯狂反弹来看，这是S&amp;P在三天下跌后的最大单日涨幅，很少有人听从他的建议。也可能不是——根据高盛的flow desk的数据，尽管今天的上涨引起了轩然大波，但几乎没有机构参与。以下是收盘后的洪水：</blockquote></p><p>   I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).    Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.  Earlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.</p><p><blockquote>我对今天的反弹速度感到惊讶，但我认为我们现在还不能大声疾呼（由于昨天盘前标记的各种定位动态，我仍然为未来一周左右的波动做好准备）。昨天回撤期间，我们的办公桌很活跃，但今天出奇的安静，没有看到机构增加我们办公桌上的风险……感觉就像空头对冲创可贴被撕掉了……ETF占总磁带的32%（低于昨天的35%，但高于年初至今平均24%）非必需消费品空头是今天的痛点....（GSCBMSDS指数）+437bps。今天早些时候，我们展示了今天走势的最大亮点是昨天开始并几乎在一周前开始的地方结束的撕破脸的空头挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1bada8a9e392b1bd35c3374d098f1a\" tg-width=\"982\" tg-height=\"564\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...</p><p><blockquote>如果高盛是对的，如果今天的举动只是一次巨大的挤压，那么明天准备好迎接更多的烟花吧，因为抛售从新挤压的更高的价格点恢复...</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-flow-desk-no-institutions-bought-todays-dip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126936349","content_text":"Overnight, Goldman trader John Flood had some advice for its institutional clients: \"don't buy this dip.\"\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\nWell, judging by today's furious bounce in the market which was the biggest one-day gain in the S&P following three days of losses, few followed his advice. Or maybe not - according to Goldman's flow desk, despite all the sound and fury of today's gain, virtually no institutions took part. Here is Flood again after the close:\n\n I was surprised by the velocity of today's rebound but dont think we can scream all clear just yet (i am still bracing for choppiness over the next week or so due to various positioning dynamics Iflagged pre mkt yesterday).\n\n\n Our desk during the drawdown yesterday was active but today eerily quiet and not seeing institutions add to risk on our desk...feels like short hedge band aids being ripped off at the moment...ETFs represent 32% of total tape (down from 35% yesterday but up from 24% ytd avg) Consumer Discretionary shorts a focal point of pain today....(GSCBMSDS INDEX) +437bps.\n\nEarlier today we showed that the biggest highlight of today's move was the face-ripping short squeeze that started yesterday and ended almost where it started one week ago.\nIf Goldman is right, and if today's move was just one giant squeeze, brace for more fireworks tomorrow as the selling resumes from a freshly squeezed and higher price point...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1387,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":821716780,"gmtCreate":1633788947154,"gmtModify":1633788947246,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821716780","repostId":"2174973126","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1008,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":862993065,"gmtCreate":1632825552148,"gmtModify":1632825552278,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/862993065","repostId":"2170624172","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1189,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":860510328,"gmtCreate":1632187546064,"gmtModify":1632802210658,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/860510328","repostId":"1167572060","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":905,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":887493940,"gmtCreate":1632090829480,"gmtModify":1632802997043,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887493940","repostId":"1198486138","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":931,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":887003814,"gmtCreate":1631938805938,"gmtModify":1632805185389,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887003814","repostId":"2150370120","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":608,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":346438996,"gmtCreate":1618100660615,"gmtModify":1634294938569,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bump","listText":"Bump","text":"Bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/346438996","repostId":"1142324412","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":656,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106306469,"gmtCreate":1620087072051,"gmtModify":1634207983675,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bump","listText":"Bump","text":"Bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106306469","repostId":"1111515416","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111515416","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620053095,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111515416?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-03 22:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Li Auto Bumped Up April Deliveries. What That Bigger Number Means for Investors<blockquote>理想汽车增加了4月份的交付量。更大的数字对投资者意味着什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111515416","media":"Barron's","summary":"Chinese electric vehicle maker Li Auto had an OK number of deliveries for April—good enough for righ","content":"<p>Chinese electric vehicle maker Li Auto had an OK number of deliveries for April—good enough for right now—but not good enough for the long haul. And that’s why investors are skittish about production levels as the global chip shortage drags on.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商理想汽车4月份的交付量还不错——目前来说已经足够好了——但从长远来看还不够好。这就是为什么随着全球芯片短缺的持续，投资者对生产水平感到不安。</blockquote></p><p> Li Auto (ticker: LI) delivered 5,539 Li ONE SUVs last month, up about 111% year over year. But the year-over-year increase doesn’t matter that much because Li, along with its Chinese EVs peers, is a high-growth company. What’s a bigger deal are the month-to -month sequential changes.</p><p><blockquote>理想汽车（股票代码：LI）上个月交付了5,539辆Li One SUV，同比增长约111%。但同比增长并不那么重要，因为理想汽车及其中国电动汽车同行都是一家高增长公司。更重要的是逐月的连续变化。</blockquote></p><p> Li delivered 4,900 ONE SUVs in March, so more autos did come off the assembly line in April, The company’s best delivery month was December, when more than 6,100 vehicles went out the door.</p><p><blockquote>理想汽车在3月份交付了4,900辆ONE SUV，因此4月份确实有更多汽车下线，该公司最好的交付月份是12月份，当时有超过6,100辆汽车下线。</blockquote></p><p> The company’s stock hit its 2021 peak—$37.65— in mid-January, a few weeks after the December figure came out. Shares were up almost 2%, to roughly $20, in early trading Monday.</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价在1月中旬触及2021年峰值——37.65美元，即12月数据公布几周后。周一早盘交易中，股价上涨近2%，至约20美元。</blockquote></p><p> This year has been a tough one, so far, Li stockholders. Shares are down roughly 30% year to date. Higher interest rates, more EV competition in China as well as stagnating deliveries are all reasons for weaker investor sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>今年是艰难的一年，到目前为止，李的股东们。今年迄今为止，股价已下跌约30%。利率上升、中国电动汽车竞争加剧以及交付停滞都是投资者情绪疲软的原因。</blockquote></p><p> But deliveries across the industry are being tamped down by the semiconductor shortage. Last week, Ford Motor (F) estimated it will lose 50% of its planned second-quarter production because of a lack of chips. Ford expects to lose billions in 2021 operating profit because of having to slash deliveries.</p><p><blockquote>但由于半导体短缺，整个行业的交付量正在受到抑制。上周，福特汽车(F)估计，由于缺乏芯片，第二季度产量将损失50%。由于不得不削减交付量，福特预计2021年营业利润将损失数十亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Like Li, deliveries are bobbing at rivals NIO (NIO) and XPeng (XPEV). All three Chinese EV makers reported their delivery numbers over the weekend.</p><p><blockquote>与李一样，竞争对手蔚来（蔚来）和小鹏汽车（XPEV）的交付量也在波动。所有三家中国电动汽车制造商都在周末公布了交付数据。</blockquote></p><p> And like Li stock, both NIO and XPeng shares are down year to date. They, too, were up Monday as investors digested the delivery data.</p><p><blockquote>与理想汽车的股票一样，蔚来和小鹏汽车的股价今年迄今均下跌。随着投资者消化交付数据，周一股价也上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Li investors will have a chance to hear more about the outlook for deliveries when Li reports first-quarter results later in May.</p><p><blockquote>当Li在5月晚些时候报告第一季度业绩时，Li投资者将有机会了解更多有关交付前景的信息。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Li Auto Bumped Up April Deliveries. What That Bigger Number Means for Investors<blockquote>理想汽车增加了4月份的交付量。更大的数字对投资者意味着什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLi Auto Bumped Up April Deliveries. What That Bigger Number Means for Investors<blockquote>理想汽车增加了4月份的交付量。更大的数字对投资者意味着什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barron's</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-03 22:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Chinese electric vehicle maker Li Auto had an OK number of deliveries for April—good enough for right now—but not good enough for the long haul. And that’s why investors are skittish about production levels as the global chip shortage drags on.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商理想汽车4月份的交付量还不错——目前来说已经足够好了——但从长远来看还不够好。这就是为什么随着全球芯片短缺的持续，投资者对生产水平感到不安。</blockquote></p><p> Li Auto (ticker: LI) delivered 5,539 Li ONE SUVs last month, up about 111% year over year. But the year-over-year increase doesn’t matter that much because Li, along with its Chinese EVs peers, is a high-growth company. What’s a bigger deal are the month-to -month sequential changes.</p><p><blockquote>理想汽车（股票代码：LI）上个月交付了5,539辆Li One SUV，同比增长约111%。但同比增长并不那么重要，因为理想汽车及其中国电动汽车同行都是一家高增长公司。更重要的是逐月的连续变化。</blockquote></p><p> Li delivered 4,900 ONE SUVs in March, so more autos did come off the assembly line in April, The company’s best delivery month was December, when more than 6,100 vehicles went out the door.</p><p><blockquote>理想汽车在3月份交付了4,900辆ONE SUV，因此4月份确实有更多汽车下线，该公司最好的交付月份是12月份，当时有超过6,100辆汽车下线。</blockquote></p><p> The company’s stock hit its 2021 peak—$37.65— in mid-January, a few weeks after the December figure came out. Shares were up almost 2%, to roughly $20, in early trading Monday.</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价在1月中旬触及2021年峰值——37.65美元，即12月数据公布几周后。周一早盘交易中，股价上涨近2%，至约20美元。</blockquote></p><p> This year has been a tough one, so far, Li stockholders. Shares are down roughly 30% year to date. Higher interest rates, more EV competition in China as well as stagnating deliveries are all reasons for weaker investor sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>今年是艰难的一年，到目前为止，李的股东们。今年迄今为止，股价已下跌约30%。利率上升、中国电动汽车竞争加剧以及交付停滞都是投资者情绪疲软的原因。</blockquote></p><p> But deliveries across the industry are being tamped down by the semiconductor shortage. Last week, Ford Motor (F) estimated it will lose 50% of its planned second-quarter production because of a lack of chips. Ford expects to lose billions in 2021 operating profit because of having to slash deliveries.</p><p><blockquote>但由于半导体短缺，整个行业的交付量正在受到抑制。上周，福特汽车(F)估计，由于缺乏芯片，第二季度产量将损失50%。由于不得不削减交付量，福特预计2021年营业利润将损失数十亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Like Li, deliveries are bobbing at rivals NIO (NIO) and XPeng (XPEV). All three Chinese EV makers reported their delivery numbers over the weekend.</p><p><blockquote>与李一样，竞争对手蔚来（蔚来）和小鹏汽车（XPEV）的交付量也在波动。所有三家中国电动汽车制造商都在周末公布了交付数据。</blockquote></p><p> And like Li stock, both NIO and XPeng shares are down year to date. They, too, were up Monday as investors digested the delivery data.</p><p><blockquote>与理想汽车的股票一样，蔚来和小鹏汽车的股价今年迄今均下跌。随着投资者消化交付数据，周一股价也上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Li investors will have a chance to hear more about the outlook for deliveries when Li reports first-quarter results later in May.</p><p><blockquote>当Li在5月晚些时候报告第一季度业绩时，Li投资者将有机会了解更多有关交付前景的信息。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/li-auto-bumped-up-april-deliveries-what-that-bigger-number-means-for-investors-51620052154?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barron's</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/li-auto-bumped-up-april-deliveries-what-that-bigger-number-means-for-investors-51620052154?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111515416","content_text":"Chinese electric vehicle maker Li Auto had an OK number of deliveries for April—good enough for right now—but not good enough for the long haul. And that’s why investors are skittish about production levels as the global chip shortage drags on.\nLi Auto (ticker: LI) delivered 5,539 Li ONE SUVs last month, up about 111% year over year. But the year-over-year increase doesn’t matter that much because Li, along with its Chinese EVs peers, is a high-growth company. What’s a bigger deal are the month-to -month sequential changes.\nLi delivered 4,900 ONE SUVs in March, so more autos did come off the assembly line in April, The company’s best delivery month was December, when more than 6,100 vehicles went out the door.\nThe company’s stock hit its 2021 peak—$37.65— in mid-January, a few weeks after the December figure came out. Shares were up almost 2%, to roughly $20, in early trading Monday.\nThis year has been a tough one, so far, Li stockholders. Shares are down roughly 30% year to date. Higher interest rates, more EV competition in China as well as stagnating deliveries are all reasons for weaker investor sentiment.\nBut deliveries across the industry are being tamped down by the semiconductor shortage. Last week, Ford Motor (F) estimated it will lose 50% of its planned second-quarter production because of a lack of chips. Ford expects to lose billions in 2021 operating profit because of having to slash deliveries.\nLike Li, deliveries are bobbing at rivals NIO (NIO) and XPeng (XPEV). All three Chinese EV makers reported their delivery numbers over the weekend.\nAnd like Li stock, both NIO and XPeng shares are down year to date. They, too, were up Monday as investors digested the delivery data.\nLi investors will have a chance to hear more about the outlook for deliveries when Li reports first-quarter results later in May.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":508,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":119133980,"gmtCreate":1622525524840,"gmtModify":1634100806523,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pump","listText":"Pump","text":"Pump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/119133980","repostId":"2140457401","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":664,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":389809170,"gmtCreate":1612746872890,"gmtModify":1703764524042,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Nicely uptrend","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Nicely uptrend","text":"$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Nicely uptrend","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/389809170","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":420,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":169513983,"gmtCreate":1623842439742,"gmtModify":1634027267494,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bump","listText":"Bump","text":"Bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/169513983","repostId":"2143679504","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":363,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":192694618,"gmtCreate":1621203729734,"gmtModify":1634193519811,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bump","listText":"Bump","text":"Bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/192694618","repostId":"1185220705","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":532,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":851959913,"gmtCreate":1634865581322,"gmtModify":1634866375096,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851959913","repostId":"2177462128","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":155250145,"gmtCreate":1625441709087,"gmtModify":1633940763410,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bump","listText":"Bump","text":"Bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/155250145","repostId":"1160702483","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":199743856,"gmtCreate":1620736727175,"gmtModify":1634196731937,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bump","listText":"Bump","text":"Bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/199743856","repostId":"1127282510","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":541,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":379186206,"gmtCreate":1618706531405,"gmtModify":1634291375714,"author":{"id":"3573551446689524","authorId":"3573551446689524","name":"Check7mate7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9d871c2fd09c2324036896302dbd1a6","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573551446689524","idStr":"3573551446689524"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bump","listText":"Bump","text":"Bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/379186206","repostId":"1175692875","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175692875","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1618582708,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1175692875?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-16 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move<blockquote>5440亿美元期权今天到期：以下是将发生的变化</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175692875","media":"zerohedge","summary":"While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire","content":"<p>While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire, may of which will be worthless, and others will be providing a supporting \"pin\" to underlying prices. It's why, even though we are enjoying a beautiful spring week, Goldman notes that single stock options trading activity is elevated relative to historical levels. To wit, daily options volumes are up 70% in April, up from YTD lows of $2.4bn on 30-Mar.</p><p><blockquote>虽然这不是四（甚至三）巫术日，但今天的大量每周期权将到期，其中可能一文不值，其他期权将为基础价格提供支持“引脚”。这就是为什么，尽管我们正在享受一个美丽的春季周，高盛指出，单一股票期权交易活动相对于历史水平有所上升。也就是说，4月份每日期权交易量增长了70%，高于3月30日年初至今24亿美元的低点。</blockquote></p><p><b>In total, across single stocks, $544BN of options are set to expiry today, including $305BN calls.</b>As such, today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money(ATM) options, as market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active. This flow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.</p><p><blockquote><b>总体而言，单个股票中有5440亿美元的期权将于今天到期，其中包括3050亿美元的评级。</b>因此，今天的到期对于平值（ATM）期权持有大量未平仓合约的股票可能很重要，因为做市商对其异常大的期权投资组合进行delta对冲将会很活跃。这种流动可能会抑制某些股票的波动，同时加剧其他股票的股价波动。</blockquote></p><p>How to trade this?</p><p><blockquote>这个怎么交易？</blockquote></p><p>As Goldman's Vishal Vivek writes, at major expirations, options traders track situations where<b>a large amount of open interest is set to expire.</b>In situations where there is a significant amount of expiring open interest in at-the-money strikes (strike prices at or very near the current stockprice), delta-hedging activity can impact the underlying stock’s trading that day. If market makers or other options traders who delta-hedge their positions are net long ATM options, expiration-related flow could have the effect of dampening stock price movements, causing the stock price to settle near the strike with large open interest. This situation is often referred to as a “pin” and can be an ideal situation fora large investor trying to enter/exit a stock position. Alternatively, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves.</p><p><blockquote>正如高盛的维沙尔·维韦克（Vishal Vivek）所写，在重大到期时，期权交易者会跟踪以下情况：<b>大量未平仓合约即将到期。</b>在平价执行（执行价格等于或非常接近当前股价）中存在大量到期未平仓合约的情况下，delta对冲活动可能会影响标的股票当天的交易。如果做市商或其他对其头寸进行delta对冲的期权交易者是净多头ATM期权，则与到期相关的流量可能会产生抑制股价走势的效果，导致股价以大量未平仓合约在行权附近结算。这种情况通常被称为“pin”，对于试图进入/退出股票头寸的大型投资者来说是理想的情况。或者，如果delta对冲者是ATM期权的净空头（具有“负伽马”头寸），他们的对冲活动可能会加剧股价波动。</blockquote></p><p>What that means it expiration-related trades may cause trading activity to aggressively pick up for stocks with a significant amount of ATM open interest.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着与到期相关的交易可能会导致具有大量ATM未平仓合约的股票的交易活动大幅回升。</blockquote></p><p>So to help traders looking to hop on for daytrading opportunities, here is a table identifying possible focus stocks with large ATM open interest expiring today, which is compared to the average daily volume of the underlying stocks. As Goldman puts it, \"<i>expiration-related activity is likely to have more of an impact if the open interest represents a significant percentage of the stock’s volume.\"</i></p><p><blockquote>因此，为了帮助寻求日内交易机会的交易者，这里有一个表格，列出了今天到期的ATM未平仓合约较大的可能焦点股票，并与标的股票的日均交易量进行了比较。正如高盛所说，“<i>如果未平仓合约占股票交易量的很大一部分，那么与到期相关的活动可能会产生更大的影响。”</i></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dac61cb87c2f2700d8a0e8e64324f81\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Finally, for what it's worth, this morning our friends at SpotGamma write that this has been a rather strange OPEX cycle, \"with a consistent almost mechanical bid pushing markets higher. We’ve not seen the Call Wall “breached” this many times before, but there are other aberrations that we’ve mentioned in previous notes – like net put sales. We’ve got some theories on this we are posting in a longer form piece.\"</p><p><blockquote>最后，值得一提的是，今天早上我们在SpotGamma的朋友写道，这是一个相当奇怪的运营支出周期，“持续的几乎机械的出价推动市场走高。我们以前从未见过看涨期权墙“突破”过很多次，但我们在之前的笔记中提到过其他异常现象，例如净看跌期权销售。我们对此有一些理论，我们将在一篇更长的文章中发布。”</blockquote></p><p>According to SG, because implied volatility has now compressed (ie VIX at new lows) there is now more potential for “long term” volatility. Recall how as of late any sharp, violent drop in markets was bought so quickly (see chart below).<b>These bursts lower coincided with record VIX spikes, but a reflective snap-back bid would bring a market recovery of equal force as the VIX&nbsp; (i.e. implied volatility) reversed.</b></p><p><blockquote>根据SG的说法，由于隐含波动率现在已经压缩（即VIX处于新低），现在“长期”波动的潜力更大。回想一下最近市场的任何剧烈下跌都是如何被如此迅速地买入的（见下图）。<b>这些大幅走低与创纪录的VIX飙升同时发生，但随着VIX（即隐含波动率）的逆转，反射性的snap回调将带来同等力度的市场复苏。</b></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae7a60d873792b825bdda669cafa0ed3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"297\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">And one other curious observation from SpotGamma:</p><p><blockquote>SpotGamma的另一个奇怪观察：</blockquote></p><p>When implied volatility is very high, its very sensitive to market moves and also signaling that markets are expecting more large moves ahead. As soon as markets would pause or catch a support level, that implied volatility would quickly reverse lower. <b>We often think of this analogy that if a shark stops swimming, it sinks ( partially true!). If the market stops dropping then Implied volatility sinks.</b>With this, as we often talk about, lower implied volatility (ie lower VIX) signals market makers have to buy back short hedges which fuels rallies. SG's conclusion: this current level of lower implied volatility now gives the market more downside firepower.&nbsp; Starting with a lower implied volatility “slows down” that responsive “snap-back” buying mechanism.&nbsp; Additionally, gamma is higher when IV is lower so gamma flips may have more juice.</p><p><blockquote>当隐含波动率非常高时，它对市场走势非常敏感，也表明市场预计未来会有更大的波动。一旦市场暂停或抓住支撑位，隐含波动率就会迅速反转走低。<b>我们经常想到这样一个类比，如果鲨鱼停止游泳，它就会下沉（部分正确！）.如果市场停止下跌，那么隐含波动率就会下降。</b>正如我们经常谈论的那样，较低的隐含波动率（即较低的VIX）表明做市商必须回购空头对冲，从而推动反弹。SG的结论是：目前较低的隐含波动率水平给了市场更多的下行火力。从较低的隐含波动率开始会“减缓”反应性的“snap回”购买机制。此外，当IV较低时，伽马较高，因此伽马翻转可能有更多的果汁。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move<blockquote>5440亿美元期权今天到期：以下是将发生的变化</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move<blockquote>5440亿美元期权今天到期：以下是将发生的变化</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-16 22:18</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire, may of which will be worthless, and others will be providing a supporting \"pin\" to underlying prices. It's why, even though we are enjoying a beautiful spring week, Goldman notes that single stock options trading activity is elevated relative to historical levels. To wit, daily options volumes are up 70% in April, up from YTD lows of $2.4bn on 30-Mar.</p><p><blockquote>虽然这不是四（甚至三）巫术日，但今天的大量每周期权将到期，其中可能一文不值，其他期权将为基础价格提供支持“引脚”。这就是为什么，尽管我们正在享受一个美丽的春季周，高盛指出，单一股票期权交易活动相对于历史水平有所上升。也就是说，4月份每日期权交易量增长了70%，高于3月30日年初至今24亿美元的低点。</blockquote></p><p><b>In total, across single stocks, $544BN of options are set to expiry today, including $305BN calls.</b>As such, today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money(ATM) options, as market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active. This flow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.</p><p><blockquote><b>总体而言，单个股票中有5440亿美元的期权将于今天到期，其中包括3050亿美元的评级。</b>因此，今天的到期对于平值（ATM）期权持有大量未平仓合约的股票可能很重要，因为做市商对其异常大的期权投资组合进行delta对冲将会很活跃。这种流动可能会抑制某些股票的波动，同时加剧其他股票的股价波动。</blockquote></p><p>How to trade this?</p><p><blockquote>这个怎么交易？</blockquote></p><p>As Goldman's Vishal Vivek writes, at major expirations, options traders track situations where<b>a large amount of open interest is set to expire.</b>In situations where there is a significant amount of expiring open interest in at-the-money strikes (strike prices at or very near the current stockprice), delta-hedging activity can impact the underlying stock’s trading that day. If market makers or other options traders who delta-hedge their positions are net long ATM options, expiration-related flow could have the effect of dampening stock price movements, causing the stock price to settle near the strike with large open interest. This situation is often referred to as a “pin” and can be an ideal situation fora large investor trying to enter/exit a stock position. Alternatively, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves.</p><p><blockquote>正如高盛的维沙尔·维韦克（Vishal Vivek）所写，在重大到期时，期权交易者会跟踪以下情况：<b>大量未平仓合约即将到期。</b>在平价执行（执行价格等于或非常接近当前股价）中存在大量到期未平仓合约的情况下，delta对冲活动可能会影响标的股票当天的交易。如果做市商或其他对其头寸进行delta对冲的期权交易者是净多头ATM期权，则与到期相关的流量可能会产生抑制股价走势的效果，导致股价以大量未平仓合约在行权附近结算。这种情况通常被称为“pin”，对于试图进入/退出股票头寸的大型投资者来说是理想的情况。或者，如果delta对冲者是ATM期权的净空头（具有“负伽马”头寸），他们的对冲活动可能会加剧股价波动。</blockquote></p><p>What that means it expiration-related trades may cause trading activity to aggressively pick up for stocks with a significant amount of ATM open interest.</p><p><blockquote>这意味着与到期相关的交易可能会导致具有大量ATM未平仓合约的股票的交易活动大幅回升。</blockquote></p><p>So to help traders looking to hop on for daytrading opportunities, here is a table identifying possible focus stocks with large ATM open interest expiring today, which is compared to the average daily volume of the underlying stocks. As Goldman puts it, \"<i>expiration-related activity is likely to have more of an impact if the open interest represents a significant percentage of the stock’s volume.\"</i></p><p><blockquote>因此，为了帮助寻求日内交易机会的交易者，这里有一个表格，列出了今天到期的ATM未平仓合约较大的可能焦点股票，并与标的股票的日均交易量进行了比较。正如高盛所说，“<i>如果未平仓合约占股票交易量的很大一部分，那么与到期相关的活动可能会产生更大的影响。”</i></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dac61cb87c2f2700d8a0e8e64324f81\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Finally, for what it's worth, this morning our friends at SpotGamma write that this has been a rather strange OPEX cycle, \"with a consistent almost mechanical bid pushing markets higher. We’ve not seen the Call Wall “breached” this many times before, but there are other aberrations that we’ve mentioned in previous notes – like net put sales. We’ve got some theories on this we are posting in a longer form piece.\"</p><p><blockquote>最后，值得一提的是，今天早上我们在SpotGamma的朋友写道，这是一个相当奇怪的运营支出周期，“持续的几乎机械的出价推动市场走高。我们以前从未见过看涨期权墙“突破”过很多次，但我们在之前的笔记中提到过其他异常现象，例如净看跌期权销售。我们对此有一些理论，我们将在一篇更长的文章中发布。”</blockquote></p><p>According to SG, because implied volatility has now compressed (ie VIX at new lows) there is now more potential for “long term” volatility. Recall how as of late any sharp, violent drop in markets was bought so quickly (see chart below).<b>These bursts lower coincided with record VIX spikes, but a reflective snap-back bid would bring a market recovery of equal force as the VIX&nbsp; (i.e. implied volatility) reversed.</b></p><p><blockquote>根据SG的说法，由于隐含波动率现在已经压缩（即VIX处于新低），现在“长期”波动的潜力更大。回想一下最近市场的任何剧烈下跌都是如何被如此迅速地买入的（见下图）。<b>这些大幅走低与创纪录的VIX飙升同时发生，但随着VIX（即隐含波动率）的逆转，反射性的snap回调将带来同等力度的市场复苏。</b></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae7a60d873792b825bdda669cafa0ed3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"297\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">And one other curious observation from SpotGamma:</p><p><blockquote>SpotGamma的另一个奇怪观察：</blockquote></p><p>When implied volatility is very high, its very sensitive to market moves and also signaling that markets are expecting more large moves ahead. As soon as markets would pause or catch a support level, that implied volatility would quickly reverse lower. <b>We often think of this analogy that if a shark stops swimming, it sinks ( partially true!). If the market stops dropping then Implied volatility sinks.</b>With this, as we often talk about, lower implied volatility (ie lower VIX) signals market makers have to buy back short hedges which fuels rallies. SG's conclusion: this current level of lower implied volatility now gives the market more downside firepower.&nbsp; Starting with a lower implied volatility “slows down” that responsive “snap-back” buying mechanism.&nbsp; Additionally, gamma is higher when IV is lower so gamma flips may have more juice.</p><p><blockquote>当隐含波动率非常高时，它对市场走势非常敏感，也表明市场预计未来会有更大的波动。一旦市场暂停或抓住支撑位，隐含波动率就会迅速反转走低。<b>我们经常想到这样一个类比，如果鲨鱼停止游泳，它就会下沉（部分正确！）.如果市场停止下跌，那么隐含波动率就会下降。</b>正如我们经常谈论的那样，较低的隐含波动率（即较低的VIX）表明做市商必须回购空头对冲，从而推动反弹。SG的结论是：目前较低的隐含波动率水平给了市场更多的下行火力。从较低的隐含波动率开始会“减缓”反应性的“snap回”购买机制。此外，当IV较低时，伽马较高，因此伽马翻转可能有更多的果汁。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/544-billion-options-expire-today-heres-what-will-move?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/544-billion-options-expire-today-heres-what-will-move?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175692875","content_text":"While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire, may of which will be worthless, and others will be providing a supporting \"pin\" to underlying prices. It's why, even though we are enjoying a beautiful spring week, Goldman notes that single stock options trading activity is elevated relative to historical levels. To wit, daily options volumes are up 70% in April, up from YTD lows of $2.4bn on 30-Mar.In total, across single stocks, $544BN of options are set to expiry today, including $305BN calls.As such, today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money(ATM) options, as market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active. This flow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.How to trade this?As Goldman's Vishal Vivek writes, at major expirations, options traders track situations wherea large amount of open interest is set to expire.In situations where there is a significant amount of expiring open interest in at-the-money strikes (strike prices at or very near the current stockprice), delta-hedging activity can impact the underlying stock’s trading that day. If market makers or other options traders who delta-hedge their positions are net long ATM options, expiration-related flow could have the effect of dampening stock price movements, causing the stock price to settle near the strike with large open interest. This situation is often referred to as a “pin” and can be an ideal situation fora large investor trying to enter/exit a stock position. Alternatively, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves.What that means it expiration-related trades may cause trading activity to aggressively pick up for stocks with a significant amount of ATM open interest.So to help traders looking to hop on for daytrading opportunities, here is a table identifying possible focus stocks with large ATM open interest expiring today, which is compared to the average daily volume of the underlying stocks. As Goldman puts it, \"expiration-related activity is likely to have more of an impact if the open interest represents a significant percentage of the stock’s volume.\"Finally, for what it's worth, this morning our friends at SpotGamma write that this has been a rather strange OPEX cycle, \"with a consistent almost mechanical bid pushing markets higher. We’ve not seen the Call Wall “breached” this many times before, but there are other aberrations that we’ve mentioned in previous notes – like net put sales. We’ve got some theories on this we are posting in a longer form piece.\"According to SG, because implied volatility has now compressed (ie VIX at new lows) there is now more potential for “long term” volatility. Recall how as of late any sharp, violent drop in markets was bought so quickly (see chart below).These bursts lower coincided with record VIX spikes, but a reflective snap-back bid would bring a market recovery of equal force as the VIX  (i.e. implied volatility) reversed.And one other curious observation from SpotGamma:When implied volatility is very high, its very sensitive to market moves and also signaling that markets are expecting more large moves ahead. As soon as markets would pause or catch a support level, that implied volatility would quickly reverse lower. We often think of this analogy that if a shark stops swimming, it sinks ( partially true!). If the market stops dropping then Implied volatility sinks.With this, as we often talk about, lower implied volatility (ie lower VIX) signals market makers have to buy back short hedges which fuels rallies. SG's conclusion: this current level of lower implied volatility now gives the market more downside firepower.  Starting with a lower implied volatility “slows down” that responsive “snap-back” buying mechanism.  Additionally, gamma is higher when IV is lower so gamma flips may have more juice.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":572,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}