+关注
bane
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:未知
17
关注
2
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
bane
2021-08-06
hmmm
Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate<blockquote>腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉</blockquote>
bane
2021-08-05
yay
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-08-05
here we go
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-08-04
great
Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>
bane
2021-08-04
yesss
Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>
bane
2021-08-04
could it?
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-07-20
should i buy or should i go ~?
Goldman Says "Don't Buy This Dip" And Here's Why...<blockquote>高盛说“不要在这个低点买入”,原因如下……</blockquote>
bane
2021-06-30
up up
Housing Prices Are Going Up. Must They Crash?<blockquote>房价在上涨。他们一定要坠毁吗?</blockquote>
bane
2021-06-30
☺️
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-06-29
$Virgin Galactic(SPCE)$
[Smile]
bane
2021-06-29
let’s go! 🙌🏽
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-05-09
💪🏽
U.S. hiring takes big step back as businesses scramble for workers, raw materials<blockquote>随着企业争夺工人和原材料,美国招聘大幅倒退</blockquote>
bane
2021-04-07
🙌🏽
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-04-05
🙌🏽
Is The Era Of Meme Stocks And NFTs Already Over?<blockquote>迷因股票和NFT的时代已经结束了吗?</blockquote>
bane
2021-03-29
HODL
When Will AMC Entertainment and GameStop Be Profitable?<blockquote>AMC院线和游戏驿站什么时候才能盈利?</blockquote>
bane
2021-03-23
Oh come on
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-03-12
👍🏼
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-03-12
come on!
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-03-02
let’s go
抱歉,原内容已删除
bane
2021-02-27
🙌🏽
抱歉,原内容已删除
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573625719551490","uuid":"3573625719551490","gmtCreate":1610531696608,"gmtModify":1635904472189,"name":"bane","pinyin":"bane","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":17,"tweetSize":23,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖(非转发)","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-4","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"明星虎友","description":"加入老虎社区2000天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.07.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.17%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":893640965,"gmtCreate":1628261006157,"gmtModify":1633752138942,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"hmmm","listText":"hmmm","text":"hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893640965","repostId":"1110501028","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110501028","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628260468,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1110501028?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 22:34","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate<blockquote>腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110501028","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.","content":"<p>(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.</p><p><blockquote>(8月6日)腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate<blockquote>腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate<blockquote>腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-06 22:34</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.</p><p><blockquote>(8月6日)腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"00700":"腾讯控股","TCEHY":"腾讯控股ADR"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110501028","content_text":"(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"00700":0.9,"TCEHY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899830936,"gmtCreate":1628172478625,"gmtModify":1633752944813,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yay","listText":"yay","text":"yay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899830936","repostId":"1158295123","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2333,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899142176,"gmtCreate":1628171221795,"gmtModify":1633752968158,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"here we go","listText":"here we go","text":"here we go","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899142176","repostId":"1158295123","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2023,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890069188,"gmtCreate":1628067634344,"gmtModify":1633753902170,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"great","listText":"great","text":"great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890069188","repostId":"1115773909","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115773909","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628066666,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1115773909?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 16:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115773909","media":"The Street\t","summary":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Fran","content":"<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street\t</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 16:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda\">The Street\t</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LYFT":"Lyft, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115773909","content_text":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.\nThe quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.\nRevenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.\nA survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.\nFactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.\nThe company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.\nAt last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.\nAdjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.\n\"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.\nAt June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.\nThe company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.\n\"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.\nAt the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LYFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2626,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890060005,"gmtCreate":1628067485407,"gmtModify":1633753902778,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yesss","listText":"yesss","text":"yesss","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890060005","repostId":"1115773909","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115773909","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628066666,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1115773909?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 16:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115773909","media":"The Street\t","summary":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Fran","content":"<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street\t</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 16:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda\">The Street\t</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LYFT":"Lyft, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115773909","content_text":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.\nThe quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.\nRevenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.\nA survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.\nFactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.\nThe company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.\nAt last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.\nAdjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.\n\"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.\nAt June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.\nThe company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.\n\"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.\nAt the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LYFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2513,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890087583,"gmtCreate":1628067447642,"gmtModify":1633753902899,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"could it?","listText":"could it?","text":"could it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890087583","repostId":"1115159207","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178195312,"gmtCreate":1626790702336,"gmtModify":1633770998946,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"should i buy or should i go ~?","listText":"should i buy or should i go ~?","text":"should i buy or should i go ~?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/178195312","repostId":"1188133258","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188133258","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626787650,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1188133258?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-20 21:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Says \"Don't Buy This Dip\" And Here's Why...<blockquote>高盛说“不要在这个低点买入”,原因如下……</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188133258","media":"zerohedge","summary":"At the start of the month,Goldman trader John Flood correctly saidthat we are entering the best 2-we","content":"<p>At the start of the month,Goldman trader John Flood correctly saidthat we are entering the best 2-week seasonal period of the year, with the first 18 days of the month traditionally the strongest period for markets...</p><p><blockquote>本月初,高盛交易员约翰·弗拉德 (John Flood) 正确地表示,我们正在进入一年中最好的两周季节性时期,本月的前 18 天传统上是市场最强劲的时期……</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7dc88222112e4655f492c56509f9d64\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> ... and followed up with apredictionthat shorts will have to cover, which they did during a period in which we saw 13 out of 16 trading days hit new all time highs.</p><p><blockquote>...随后,人们预测空头将不得不回补,而在此期间,我们看到 16 个交易日中有 13 个创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> Of course, it all came crashing down in the last 3 days when the S&P slide accelerated, culminating with a scary rout on Monday when tumbling yields sparked a panic that the US economy is headed straight into a stagflationary crash.</p><p><blockquote>当然,在过去三天里,当标准普尔指数加速下滑时,这一切都崩溃了,最终在周一以可怕的溃败达到高潮,当时收益率暴跌引发了人们对美国经济将直接陷入滞胀崩溃的恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> And yet, with futures rebounding and traders clearly showing a desire to catch what has been the fastest falling knife in months, we were surprised to read that the same John Flood who correctly predicted the market ramp in the first half of July, has now flipped completely and in a note published overnight writes \"<b>don't buy this dip.</b>\" He explains why:</p><p><blockquote>然而,随着期货价格反弹,交易员们清楚地表现出想要抓住几个月来跌幅最快的一把刀的愿望,我们惊讶地读到,在7月上半月正确预测市场上涨的约翰·弗拉德现在已经完全改变了主意,并在隔夜发布的一份报告中写道:“<b>不要抄底。</b>他解释了原因:</blockquote></p><p> I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week). <b>99% of S&P500 companies are in buyback blackout period into next week and quant flows remain asymmetric on the supply side (AKA CTA sellers will win this tug of war).</b>Earnings last week were great but were not rewarded (banks)...this week and next are the 2 busiest weeks of the earnings period. Overall market breadth continues to dissipate with FAAMG complex carrying the weight of the indices on its back. July has not been a fun month for the retail community (underlying retail bid is fading). HF length has recently come in significantly on a 1 year look back but on a 3 year basis is well above 50th percentile for both nets and grosses (still more wood to chop here). Institutional community continues to cut risk in China ADR’s post DIDI development while U.S. / China tensions rise. All eyes remain 10yr yields well below 200dma of 1.26 for first time in 2021. No need to hit the panic button but I plan on being patient with buy tickets over the next several sessions. And here are the 10 key<i>bearish</i>developments Flood is monitoring:</p><p><blockquote>我一直是下跌的买家,但这种波动感觉不同,我正在为本周走弱做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开,这篇文章越来越难从我的座位上放下(在上周与发行相关的一些不稳定的px行动之后)。<b>99% 的标准普尔 500 指数公司将进入下周的回购禁售期,供应端的数量流动仍然不对称(又名 CTA 卖家将赢得这场拉锯战)。</b>上周的收益很好,但没有得到回报(银行)……本周和下周是财报期最繁忙的两周。随着 FAAMG complex 背负着指数的重量,整体市场广度继续消散。对于零售界来说,七月并不是一个有趣的月份(潜在的零售竞标正在消退)。从1年的角度来看,HF长度最近有了很大的进步,但从3年的角度来看,无论是净资产还是总收入,都远高于第50个百分位(这里还有更多的木头要砍)。中美紧张局势加剧之际,机构界继续降低中国 ADR 后滴滴发展的风险。所有人都在关注 2021 年 10 年期国债收益率首次远低于 1.26 的 200dma。没有必要按下紧急按钮,但我计划在接下来的几个会议中耐心买票。以下是10把钥匙<i>看跌</i>正在监测的发展洪水:</blockquote></p><p> <b>1) Covid headlines over the weekend were the most negative that I have seen in 2021. Here are the 5 that stood out to me...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1) 周末的新冠疫情头条新闻是我在 2021 年见过的最负面的。以下是让我印象深刻的5个……</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul> <li>U.S. infections surged more than 60% last week, topping a 16% global increase. Delta cases may be undercounted, former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb said. The Dr. warned that the US is “vastly underestimating” the level of COVID delta spread domestically.CNBC</li> <li>The CDC warns of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” as cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities rise in those parts of the country with low inoculation rates.BBG</li> <li>CDC says other major US cities will probably follow LA and reimpose mask mandates as COVID statistics continue to deteriorate.FT</li> <li>First Olympic athletes in Tokyo test positive for COVID, just days before the games are expected to commence (Coco Gauff the highest profile U.S. athlete to withdraw)</li> <li>The UK said travelers from France will need to quarantine for 10 days regardless of vaccination status, an announcement that “leaves holidays in disarray”.London Times</li> </ul> <b>2) It has been a paper party and this paper is getting harder to place. Last week we priced 11 registered deals in the U.S. ($3b notional) and this week already working on another 18 ($10b). This is especially noteworthy while in the depths of July.</b></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>上周美国感染人数激增 60% 以上,超过全球 16% 的增幅。前 FDA 局长斯科特·戈特利布 (Scott Gottlieb) 表示,三角洲病例可能被低估了。这位博士警告说,美国“大大低估了”新冠病毒在国内的传播水平。CNBC</li><li>美国疾病控制与预防中心警告称,在全国接种率较低的地区,病例、住院人数和死亡人数都在上升,可能会出现 “未接种疫苗者的大流行”。</li><li>疾病预防控制中心表示,随着新冠统计数据持续恶化,美国其他主要城市可能会效仿洛杉矶,重新实施口罩强制令。FT</li><li>就在奥运会预计开始前几天,首批东京奥运会运动员新冠病毒检测呈阳性(科科·高夫是退出的最引人注目的美国运动员)</li><li>英国表示,无论疫苗接种情况如何,来自法国的旅客都需要隔离10天,这一声明“让假期陷入混乱”。伦敦时报</li></ul><b>2)这是一个纸党,这个纸越来越难放置。上周,我们对美国的11笔注册交易进行了定价(名义价值30亿美元),本周已经在处理另外18笔交易(名义价值100亿美元)。这在七月下旬尤其值得注意。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>3) Only 1 week into 2Q earnings but banks telling us to expect beats but NOT TO expect these beats to be rewarded. AKA sell sides estimates are still too low and positioning remains crowded. Since JPM kicked of megacap tech bank earnings last Tuesday morning (essentially beats across the board) bank index has shed 355bps.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3) 第二季度财报发布仅一周,但银行告诉我们预计会出现好转,但不要指望这些好转会得到回报。又名卖方估计仍然太低,仓位仍然拥挤。自摩根大通上周二上午公布大型科技银行收益(基本上全面跑赢)以来,银行指数已下跌 355 个基点。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>4) We are in depths of corporate buyback blackout period and this will run through 7/23/21....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>4)我们正处于企业回购禁售期,这将持续到21年7月23日…….</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2aaf1e5d45694a097b50a91dbde1c820\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"271\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>5) Systematic flows are asymmetric...(AKA CTAs are sellers in a up and down tape)....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>5)系统流程是不对称的……(又名CTA是上下磁带中的卖家)....</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4bba4d70220e9707ea2844810c1a10b2\" tg-width=\"866\" tg-height=\"381\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>6) Market breadth continues to deteriorate (was at ATH of 100 last month)....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>6) 市场广度继续恶化(上个月为 100)....</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39de9052680301024db46173d0dce29f\" tg-width=\"507\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>7) AKA without recent stellar price action on FAAMG the market would be in some trouble...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>7) 又名,如果没有最近 FAAMG 的出色价格走势,市场将会遇到一些麻烦……</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ae0c7eead73ad8dc2ecc63bcbd9e27e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"385\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>8) Tensions with China escalating and we see continued derisking in ADRs: The White House is accusing China of perpetrating a massive hack of Microsoft’s email systems and will form a coalition of NATO members to condemn Beijing’s cyber activities.NYT</b></p><p><blockquote><b>8) 与中国的紧张局势升级,我们看到 ADR 继续去风险化: 白宫指责中国对微软的电子邮件系统进行了大规模黑客攻击,并将组建北约成员国联盟谴责北京的网络活动。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>9) Retail support has been waning MTD....(GS HIGH RETAIL SENTIMENT BASKET)....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>9)零售支持一直在减弱MTD....(GS高零售情绪篮子)....</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91d1bdeccdbb13bda1edf2982fd29b9c\" tg-width=\"969\" tg-height=\"737\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>1</b><b>0) On 1 year look back Fundamental L/S positioning has come in significantly....on a 3yr look back still elevated....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1</b><b>0)1年回顾,基本的L/S定位已经显著进步…….3年回顾,仍然上升…….</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/588f67823e6fabf1df2586491f930477\" tg-width=\"912\" tg-height=\"105\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Says \"Don't Buy This Dip\" And Here's Why...<blockquote>高盛说“不要在这个低点买入”,原因如下……</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Says \"Don't Buy This Dip\" And Here's Why...<blockquote>高盛说“不要在这个低点买入”,原因如下……</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-20 21:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>At the start of the month,Goldman trader John Flood correctly saidthat we are entering the best 2-week seasonal period of the year, with the first 18 days of the month traditionally the strongest period for markets...</p><p><blockquote>本月初,高盛交易员约翰·弗拉德 (John Flood) 正确地表示,我们正在进入一年中最好的两周季节性时期,本月的前 18 天传统上是市场最强劲的时期……</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7dc88222112e4655f492c56509f9d64\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> ... and followed up with apredictionthat shorts will have to cover, which they did during a period in which we saw 13 out of 16 trading days hit new all time highs.</p><p><blockquote>...随后,人们预测空头将不得不回补,而在此期间,我们看到 16 个交易日中有 13 个创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> Of course, it all came crashing down in the last 3 days when the S&P slide accelerated, culminating with a scary rout on Monday when tumbling yields sparked a panic that the US economy is headed straight into a stagflationary crash.</p><p><blockquote>当然,在过去三天里,当标准普尔指数加速下滑时,这一切都崩溃了,最终在周一以可怕的溃败达到高潮,当时收益率暴跌引发了人们对美国经济将直接陷入滞胀崩溃的恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> And yet, with futures rebounding and traders clearly showing a desire to catch what has been the fastest falling knife in months, we were surprised to read that the same John Flood who correctly predicted the market ramp in the first half of July, has now flipped completely and in a note published overnight writes \"<b>don't buy this dip.</b>\" He explains why:</p><p><blockquote>然而,随着期货价格反弹,交易员们清楚地表现出想要抓住几个月来跌幅最快的一把刀的愿望,我们惊讶地读到,在7月上半月正确预测市场上涨的约翰·弗拉德现在已经完全改变了主意,并在隔夜发布的一份报告中写道:“<b>不要抄底。</b>他解释了原因:</blockquote></p><p> I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week). <b>99% of S&P500 companies are in buyback blackout period into next week and quant flows remain asymmetric on the supply side (AKA CTA sellers will win this tug of war).</b>Earnings last week were great but were not rewarded (banks)...this week and next are the 2 busiest weeks of the earnings period. Overall market breadth continues to dissipate with FAAMG complex carrying the weight of the indices on its back. July has not been a fun month for the retail community (underlying retail bid is fading). HF length has recently come in significantly on a 1 year look back but on a 3 year basis is well above 50th percentile for both nets and grosses (still more wood to chop here). Institutional community continues to cut risk in China ADR’s post DIDI development while U.S. / China tensions rise. All eyes remain 10yr yields well below 200dma of 1.26 for first time in 2021. No need to hit the panic button but I plan on being patient with buy tickets over the next several sessions. And here are the 10 key<i>bearish</i>developments Flood is monitoring:</p><p><blockquote>我一直是下跌的买家,但这种波动感觉不同,我正在为本周走弱做好准备。负面的Covid头条新闻正在加速。发行龙头完全打开,这篇文章越来越难从我的座位上放下(在上周与发行相关的一些不稳定的px行动之后)。<b>99% 的标准普尔 500 指数公司将进入下周的回购禁售期,供应端的数量流动仍然不对称(又名 CTA 卖家将赢得这场拉锯战)。</b>上周的收益很好,但没有得到回报(银行)……本周和下周是财报期最繁忙的两周。随着 FAAMG complex 背负着指数的重量,整体市场广度继续消散。对于零售界来说,七月并不是一个有趣的月份(潜在的零售竞标正在消退)。从1年的角度来看,HF长度最近有了很大的进步,但从3年的角度来看,无论是净资产还是总收入,都远高于第50个百分位(这里还有更多的木头要砍)。中美紧张局势加剧之际,机构界继续降低中国 ADR 后滴滴发展的风险。所有人都在关注 2021 年 10 年期国债收益率首次远低于 1.26 的 200dma。没有必要按下紧急按钮,但我计划在接下来的几个会议中耐心买票。以下是10把钥匙<i>看跌</i>正在监测的发展洪水:</blockquote></p><p> <b>1) Covid headlines over the weekend were the most negative that I have seen in 2021. Here are the 5 that stood out to me...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1) 周末的新冠疫情头条新闻是我在 2021 年见过的最负面的。以下是让我印象深刻的5个……</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul> <li>U.S. infections surged more than 60% last week, topping a 16% global increase. Delta cases may be undercounted, former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb said. The Dr. warned that the US is “vastly underestimating” the level of COVID delta spread domestically.CNBC</li> <li>The CDC warns of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” as cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities rise in those parts of the country with low inoculation rates.BBG</li> <li>CDC says other major US cities will probably follow LA and reimpose mask mandates as COVID statistics continue to deteriorate.FT</li> <li>First Olympic athletes in Tokyo test positive for COVID, just days before the games are expected to commence (Coco Gauff the highest profile U.S. athlete to withdraw)</li> <li>The UK said travelers from France will need to quarantine for 10 days regardless of vaccination status, an announcement that “leaves holidays in disarray”.London Times</li> </ul> <b>2) It has been a paper party and this paper is getting harder to place. Last week we priced 11 registered deals in the U.S. ($3b notional) and this week already working on another 18 ($10b). This is especially noteworthy while in the depths of July.</b></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>上周美国感染人数激增 60% 以上,超过全球 16% 的增幅。前 FDA 局长斯科特·戈特利布 (Scott Gottlieb) 表示,三角洲病例可能被低估了。这位博士警告说,美国“大大低估了”新冠病毒在国内的传播水平。CNBC</li><li>美国疾病控制与预防中心警告称,在全国接种率较低的地区,病例、住院人数和死亡人数都在上升,可能会出现 “未接种疫苗者的大流行”。</li><li>疾病预防控制中心表示,随着新冠统计数据持续恶化,美国其他主要城市可能会效仿洛杉矶,重新实施口罩强制令。FT</li><li>就在奥运会预计开始前几天,首批东京奥运会运动员新冠病毒检测呈阳性(科科·高夫是退出的最引人注目的美国运动员)</li><li>英国表示,无论疫苗接种情况如何,来自法国的旅客都需要隔离10天,这一声明“让假期陷入混乱”。伦敦时报</li></ul><b>2)这是一个纸党,这个纸越来越难放置。上周,我们对美国的11笔注册交易进行了定价(名义价值30亿美元),本周已经在处理另外18笔交易(名义价值100亿美元)。这在七月下旬尤其值得注意。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>3) Only 1 week into 2Q earnings but banks telling us to expect beats but NOT TO expect these beats to be rewarded. AKA sell sides estimates are still too low and positioning remains crowded. Since JPM kicked of megacap tech bank earnings last Tuesday morning (essentially beats across the board) bank index has shed 355bps.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3) 第二季度财报发布仅一周,但银行告诉我们预计会出现好转,但不要指望这些好转会得到回报。又名卖方估计仍然太低,仓位仍然拥挤。自摩根大通上周二上午公布大型科技银行收益(基本上全面跑赢)以来,银行指数已下跌 355 个基点。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>4) We are in depths of corporate buyback blackout period and this will run through 7/23/21....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>4)我们正处于企业回购禁售期,这将持续到21年7月23日…….</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2aaf1e5d45694a097b50a91dbde1c820\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"271\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>5) Systematic flows are asymmetric...(AKA CTAs are sellers in a up and down tape)....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>5)系统流程是不对称的……(又名CTA是上下磁带中的卖家)....</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4bba4d70220e9707ea2844810c1a10b2\" tg-width=\"866\" tg-height=\"381\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>6) Market breadth continues to deteriorate (was at ATH of 100 last month)....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>6) 市场广度继续恶化(上个月为 100)....</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39de9052680301024db46173d0dce29f\" tg-width=\"507\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>7) AKA without recent stellar price action on FAAMG the market would be in some trouble...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>7) 又名,如果没有最近 FAAMG 的出色价格走势,市场将会遇到一些麻烦……</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ae0c7eead73ad8dc2ecc63bcbd9e27e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"385\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>8) Tensions with China escalating and we see continued derisking in ADRs: The White House is accusing China of perpetrating a massive hack of Microsoft’s email systems and will form a coalition of NATO members to condemn Beijing’s cyber activities.NYT</b></p><p><blockquote><b>8) 与中国的紧张局势升级,我们看到 ADR 继续去风险化: 白宫指责中国对微软的电子邮件系统进行了大规模黑客攻击,并将组建北约成员国联盟谴责北京的网络活动。</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>9) Retail support has been waning MTD....(GS HIGH RETAIL SENTIMENT BASKET)....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>9)零售支持一直在减弱MTD....(GS高零售情绪篮子)....</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91d1bdeccdbb13bda1edf2982fd29b9c\" tg-width=\"969\" tg-height=\"737\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>1</b><b>0) On 1 year look back Fundamental L/S positioning has come in significantly....on a 3yr look back still elevated....</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1</b><b>0)1年回顾,基本的L/S定位已经显著进步…….3年回顾,仍然上升…….</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/588f67823e6fabf1df2586491f930477\" tg-width=\"912\" tg-height=\"105\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-says-dont-buy-dip-and-heres-why?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-says-dont-buy-dip-and-heres-why?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188133258","content_text":"At the start of the month,Goldman trader John Flood correctly saidthat we are entering the best 2-week seasonal period of the year, with the first 18 days of the month traditionally the strongest period for markets...\n\n... and followed up with apredictionthat shorts will have to cover, which they did during a period in which we saw 13 out of 16 trading days hit new all time highs.\nOf course, it all came crashing down in the last 3 days when the S&P slide accelerated, culminating with a scary rout on Monday when tumbling yields sparked a panic that the US economy is headed straight into a stagflationary crash.\nAnd yet, with futures rebounding and traders clearly showing a desire to catch what has been the fastest falling knife in months, we were surprised to read that the same John Flood who correctly predicted the market ramp in the first half of July, has now flipped completely and in a note published overnight writes \"don't buy this dip.\" He explains why:\n\n I am a consistent buyer of dips but this wobble feels different and I am bracing for a weaker tape this week. Negative Covid headlines are picking up in velocity. Issuance spigots are fully turned on and this paper is getting harder to place from my seat (after some choppy px action related to issuance last week).\n\n\n99% of S&P500 companies are in buyback blackout period into next week and quant flows remain asymmetric on the supply side (AKA CTA sellers will win this tug of war).Earnings last week were great but were not rewarded (banks)...this week and next are the 2 busiest weeks of the earnings period.\n\n\n Overall market breadth continues to dissipate with FAAMG complex carrying the weight of the indices on its back. July has not been a fun month for the retail community (underlying retail bid is fading). HF length has recently come in significantly on a 1 year look back but on a 3 year basis is well above 50th percentile for both nets and grosses (still more wood to chop here). Institutional community continues to cut risk in China ADR’s post DIDI development while U.S. / China tensions rise. All eyes remain 10yr yields well below 200dma of 1.26 for first time in 2021. No need to hit the panic button but I plan on being patient with buy tickets over the next several sessions.\n\nAnd here are the 10 keybearishdevelopments Flood is monitoring:\n1) Covid headlines over the weekend were the most negative that I have seen in 2021. Here are the 5 that stood out to me...\n\nU.S. infections surged more than 60% last week, topping a 16% global increase. Delta cases may be undercounted, former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb said. The Dr. warned that the US is “vastly underestimating” the level of COVID delta spread domestically.CNBC\nThe CDC warns of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” as cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities rise in those parts of the country with low inoculation rates.BBG\nCDC says other major US cities will probably follow LA and reimpose mask mandates as COVID statistics continue to deteriorate.FT\nFirst Olympic athletes in Tokyo test positive for COVID, just days before the games are expected to commence (Coco Gauff the highest profile U.S. athlete to withdraw)\nThe UK said travelers from France will need to quarantine for 10 days regardless of vaccination status, an announcement that “leaves holidays in disarray”.London Times\n\n2) It has been a paper party and this paper is getting harder to place. Last week we priced 11 registered deals in the U.S. ($3b notional) and this week already working on another 18 ($10b). This is especially noteworthy while in the depths of July.\n3) Only 1 week into 2Q earnings but banks telling us to expect beats but NOT TO expect these beats to be rewarded. AKA sell sides estimates are still too low and positioning remains crowded. Since JPM kicked of megacap tech bank earnings last Tuesday morning (essentially beats across the board) bank index has shed 355bps.\n4) We are in depths of corporate buyback blackout period and this will run through 7/23/21....\n5) Systematic flows are asymmetric...(AKA CTAs are sellers in a up and down tape)....\n6) Market breadth continues to deteriorate (was at ATH of 100 last month)....\n7) AKA without recent stellar price action on FAAMG the market would be in some trouble...\n\n8) Tensions with China escalating and we see continued derisking in ADRs: The White House is accusing China of perpetrating a massive hack of Microsoft’s email systems and will form a coalition of NATO members to condemn Beijing’s cyber activities.NYT\n9) Retail support has been waning MTD....(GS HIGH RETAIL SENTIMENT BASKET)....\n\n10) On 1 year look back Fundamental L/S positioning has come in significantly....on a 3yr look back still elevated....","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2316,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153866645,"gmtCreate":1625017657187,"gmtModify":1633945801056,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"up up ","listText":"up up ","text":"up up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153866645","repostId":"1187567340","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187567340","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625017360,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1187567340?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-30 09:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Housing Prices Are Going Up. Must They Crash?<blockquote>房价在上涨。他们一定要坠毁吗?</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187567340","media":"Barrons","summary":"There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices hav","content":"<p>There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices have appreciated by well more than 10% over the past year. This naturally leads to a concern about market volatility: Must what goes up comedown? Are werepeatingthe excesses of the early 2000s, when housing prices surged before the market crashed?</p><p><blockquote>有许多报道称购房者陷入竞购战,许多城市的房价在过去一年中上涨了 10% 以上。这自然会引发对市场波动的担忧:上涨的东西一定会下跌吗?我们是否正在重蹈21世纪初房价在市场崩溃前飙升的过度行为?</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts argue that this time, it’s even less likely that prices will fall.Inventoriesof new homes for sale are very low, and lending standards are much tighter than in 2005. This is true. In fact, the ground is even firmer than it seems.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师认为,这一次,房价下跌的可能性更小。待售新房库存非常低,贷款标准也比2005年严格得多。这是真的。事实上,地面比看起来还要坚实。</blockquote></p><p> New home inventories were very high before the Great Recession. Today, they are closer to the level that has been common for decades. The portion of inventory built and ready for move-in is especially low because of supply chain interruptions combined with a sudden boost of demand during the coronavirus pandemic. We shouldn’t worry much about a crash when buyers are eagerly snapping up the available homes.</p><p><blockquote>在大衰退之前,新房库存非常高。今天,它们更接近几十年来常见的水平。由于供应链中断加上冠状病毒大流行期间需求的突然增加,已建立并准备入住的库存部分特别低。当买家急于抢购现有房屋时,我们不应该太担心房屋崩盘。</blockquote></p><p> Yet there’s another reason to believe a housing crash is unlikely: Even the high level of inventory in 2005 wasn’t nearly as speculative as most people think. Understanding why will help us interpret today’s market.</p><p><blockquote>然而,还有另一个理由认为房地产崩盘的可能性不大: 即使是 2005 年的高库存水平,也远没有大多数人想象的那么具有投机性。了解原因将有助于我们解读当今的市场。</blockquote></p><p> In 2005, homes were being built because sales were high, and sales were high in parts of the country where demand was strong. Builders were conservatively scaling their inventories with rising sales. The same is true today.</p><p><blockquote>2005年,房屋正在建造,因为销售很高,在该国需求旺盛的部分地区销售也很高。随着销售额的增长,建筑商保守地扩大库存规模。今天也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Frequently, analysts cite the sharp rise in months of inventory—the number of months it will take to sell the current supply of homes being constructed for sale, at the current sales rate—as evidence of overzealous building during the last boom. But timing is key here. Decades of experience tell a clear story: Months of inventory is mostly a function of sales rather than builder speculation. When sales are strong, homes are turning over, and months of inventory tend to stay low. When sales quickly decline, builders tend to be left with unexpectedly high inventory.</p><p><blockquote>分析师经常引用库存月数的急剧上升——按目前的销售速度出售当前待售房屋供应量所需的月数——作为上次繁荣期间过度热情建筑的证据。但是时机是关键。几十年的经验告诉我们一个清晰的故事:几个月的库存主要是销售的功能,而不是建筑商的投机。当销售强劲时,房屋正在周转,几个月的库存往往会保持在较低水平。当销售额迅速下降时,建筑商往往会面临意想不到的高库存。</blockquote></p><p> From the late 1990s all the way up to the peak of new home sales in mid-2005,inventory was at historic lows, with about four months’ worth remaining. Of course, builders were creating more inventory to match growing sales, but it was barely enough to keep up with demand, so the number held fairly constant. Then, as economic growth started to slow, a deep drop in sales coincided with a sharp rise in months of inventory.</p><p><blockquote>从 20 世纪 90 年代末一直到 2005 年中期新房销售高峰,库存一直处于历史低位,只剩下大约四个月的价值。当然,建筑商正在创造更多的库存来匹配不断增长的销售,但这几乎不足以满足需求,因此数量保持相当稳定。然后,随着经济增长开始放缓,销售额的大幅下降与几个月来库存的急剧上升同时发生。</blockquote></p><p> Today, there are also about four months of inventory, and sales are around the same level as they were in the late 1990s. So, while it’s easy to look at on-the-ground activity and conclude that low inventory could cause bidding wars among buyers, we need to remember that buyers are really driving inventory more than the other way around. In other words, builders decide to create new homes when demand is high from buyers. If demand suddenly dries up, builders can’t suddenly make the inventory of homes under construction disappear.</p><p><blockquote>如今,还有大约四个月的库存,销售额与 20 世纪 90 年代末的水平大致相同。因此,虽然我们很容易从现场活动中得出低库存可能会导致买家之间的竞价战的结论,但我们需要记住,买家实际上是在推动库存,而不是相反。换句话说,当买家需求高时,建筑商决定建造新房。如果需求突然枯竭,建筑商不能让在建房屋的库存突然消失。</blockquote></p><p> Demand for new homes is something over which federal policy makers actually have some control. The Federal Reserve and other federal regulators should aim to avoid sharp declines in sales. The Fed can do this by raising or lowering interest rates, changing the money supply, and targeting changes in prices and nominal economic activity. Federal regulators can make sure that stable lending conditions are maintained, or not.One reasonthe Great Recession was so bad was that Federal Reserve officials and other federal regulators, generally responding to public sentiment, washed their hands of the horrendous collapse in sales and left homebuilders and sellers out to dry.</p><p><blockquote>联邦政策制定者实际上可以控制对新房的需求。美联储和其他联邦监管机构应致力于避免销售额急剧下降。美联储可以通过提高或降低利率、改变货币供应量以及瞄准价格和名义经济活动的变化来做到这一点。联邦监管机构可以确保保持稳定的贷款条件,也可以不保持稳定。大衰退如此严重的一个原因是,美联储官员和其他联邦监管机构通常会对公众情绪做出反应,对可怕的销售崩溃置之不理,让房屋建筑商和销售商自生自灭。</blockquote></p><p> But even in that worst-case scenario, the 2000s market was much more resilient than it seemed. In July 2005, when buyers backed off and months of inventory started to surge, the median U.S. home price was $198,000, according toZillow. In July 2008, when months of inventory was near its peak, it was still at $199,000.</p><p><blockquote>但即使在最坏的情况下,2000 年代的市场也比看起来更有弹性。据 toZillow 称,2005 年 7 月,当买家退出,几个月的库存开始激增时,美国房价中值为 198,000 美元。2008 年 7 月,当几个月的库存接近峰值时,库存仍处于 19.9 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> At the June 2006 Federal Reserve meeting, Ben Bernanke said, “It is a good thing that housing is cooling. If we could wave a magic wand and reinstate 2005, we wouldn’t want to do that.” It’s notable that Jerome Powell, who today holds Bernanke’s former position as Fed chair, isn’t openly pining for a “cooler” housing market.</p><p><blockquote>在 2006 年 6 月的美联储会议上,本-伯南克说:“房地产降温是件好事。如果我们能挥舞魔杖,恢复 2005 年,我们就不想这么做了。”值得注意的是,如今接替伯南克担任美联储主席的杰罗姆-鲍威尔(Jerome Powell)并没有公开渴望 “降温 ”的房地产市场。</blockquote></p><p> There is a common belief that before the Great Recession, homebuyers were taken in by themyththat home prices never go down, and they became complacent. Those buyers turned out to be wrong. Yet, even when a concerted effort to kill housing markets succeeded, we had to beat them into submission for three full years before prices relented. Home prices can go down, but we have to work very hard, together, for a long time, to make them fall.</p><p><blockquote>人们普遍认为,在大衰退之前,购房者被房价永远不会下跌的神话所迷惑,他们变得自满。那些买家被证明是错的。然而,即使在扼杀房地产市场的共同努力取得成功时,我们也不得不让它们屈服整整三年,房价才有所缓和。房价可能会下跌,但我们必须非常努力地工作,一起工作很长时间,才能让房价下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> If you are a buyer in a hot market where home prices are 30% higher than they were a year ago, you’re getting a 30% worse deal than you could have had back then. Nothing can be done about that. That said, the main things to be concerned with are the factors federal policymakers are in control of. There is little reason to expect housing demand to collapse. If it does, it will require communal intention—federal monetary and credit policies meant to create or accept a sharp drop in demand. And even if federal officials intend for housing construction to collapse, history suggests that a market contraction would push new sales down deeply for an extended period of time before prices relent.</p><p><blockquote>如果你是一个热门市场的买家,房价比一年前高出 30%,那么你得到的交易将比当时差 30%。对此无能为力。也就是说,主要关注的是联邦政策制定者可以控制的因素。几乎没有理由预期住房需求会崩溃。如果发生这种情况,它将需要公共意图——联邦货币和信贷政策旨在创造或接受需求的急剧下降。即使联邦官员希望住房建设崩溃,历史表明,在价格回落之前,市场萎缩将在很长一段时间内推动新销售大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Housing Prices Are Going Up. Must They Crash?<blockquote>房价在上涨。他们一定要坠毁吗?</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHousing Prices Are Going Up. Must They Crash?<blockquote>房价在上涨。他们一定要坠毁吗?</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-30 09:42</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices have appreciated by well more than 10% over the past year. This naturally leads to a concern about market volatility: Must what goes up comedown? Are werepeatingthe excesses of the early 2000s, when housing prices surged before the market crashed?</p><p><blockquote>有许多报道称购房者陷入竞购战,许多城市的房价在过去一年中上涨了 10% 以上。这自然会引发对市场波动的担忧:上涨的东西一定会下跌吗?我们是否正在重蹈21世纪初房价在市场崩溃前飙升的过度行为?</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts argue that this time, it’s even less likely that prices will fall.Inventoriesof new homes for sale are very low, and lending standards are much tighter than in 2005. This is true. In fact, the ground is even firmer than it seems.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师认为,这一次,房价下跌的可能性更小。待售新房库存非常低,贷款标准也比2005年严格得多。这是真的。事实上,地面比看起来还要坚实。</blockquote></p><p> New home inventories were very high before the Great Recession. Today, they are closer to the level that has been common for decades. The portion of inventory built and ready for move-in is especially low because of supply chain interruptions combined with a sudden boost of demand during the coronavirus pandemic. We shouldn’t worry much about a crash when buyers are eagerly snapping up the available homes.</p><p><blockquote>在大衰退之前,新房库存非常高。今天,它们更接近几十年来常见的水平。由于供应链中断加上冠状病毒大流行期间需求的突然增加,已建立并准备入住的库存部分特别低。当买家急于抢购现有房屋时,我们不应该太担心房屋崩盘。</blockquote></p><p> Yet there’s another reason to believe a housing crash is unlikely: Even the high level of inventory in 2005 wasn’t nearly as speculative as most people think. Understanding why will help us interpret today’s market.</p><p><blockquote>然而,还有另一个理由认为房地产崩盘的可能性不大: 即使是 2005 年的高库存水平,也远没有大多数人想象的那么具有投机性。了解原因将有助于我们解读当今的市场。</blockquote></p><p> In 2005, homes were being built because sales were high, and sales were high in parts of the country where demand was strong. Builders were conservatively scaling their inventories with rising sales. The same is true today.</p><p><blockquote>2005年,房屋正在建造,因为销售很高,在该国需求旺盛的部分地区销售也很高。随着销售额的增长,建筑商保守地扩大库存规模。今天也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Frequently, analysts cite the sharp rise in months of inventory—the number of months it will take to sell the current supply of homes being constructed for sale, at the current sales rate—as evidence of overzealous building during the last boom. But timing is key here. Decades of experience tell a clear story: Months of inventory is mostly a function of sales rather than builder speculation. When sales are strong, homes are turning over, and months of inventory tend to stay low. When sales quickly decline, builders tend to be left with unexpectedly high inventory.</p><p><blockquote>分析师经常引用库存月数的急剧上升——按目前的销售速度出售当前待售房屋供应量所需的月数——作为上次繁荣期间过度热情建筑的证据。但是时机是关键。几十年的经验告诉我们一个清晰的故事:几个月的库存主要是销售的功能,而不是建筑商的投机。当销售强劲时,房屋正在周转,几个月的库存往往会保持在较低水平。当销售额迅速下降时,建筑商往往会面临意想不到的高库存。</blockquote></p><p> From the late 1990s all the way up to the peak of new home sales in mid-2005,inventory was at historic lows, with about four months’ worth remaining. Of course, builders were creating more inventory to match growing sales, but it was barely enough to keep up with demand, so the number held fairly constant. Then, as economic growth started to slow, a deep drop in sales coincided with a sharp rise in months of inventory.</p><p><blockquote>从 20 世纪 90 年代末一直到 2005 年中期新房销售高峰,库存一直处于历史低位,只剩下大约四个月的价值。当然,建筑商正在创造更多的库存来匹配不断增长的销售,但这几乎不足以满足需求,因此数量保持相当稳定。然后,随着经济增长开始放缓,销售额的大幅下降与几个月来库存的急剧上升同时发生。</blockquote></p><p> Today, there are also about four months of inventory, and sales are around the same level as they were in the late 1990s. So, while it’s easy to look at on-the-ground activity and conclude that low inventory could cause bidding wars among buyers, we need to remember that buyers are really driving inventory more than the other way around. In other words, builders decide to create new homes when demand is high from buyers. If demand suddenly dries up, builders can’t suddenly make the inventory of homes under construction disappear.</p><p><blockquote>如今,还有大约四个月的库存,销售额与 20 世纪 90 年代末的水平大致相同。因此,虽然我们很容易从现场活动中得出低库存可能会导致买家之间的竞价战的结论,但我们需要记住,买家实际上是在推动库存,而不是相反。换句话说,当买家需求高时,建筑商决定建造新房。如果需求突然枯竭,建筑商不能让在建房屋的库存突然消失。</blockquote></p><p> Demand for new homes is something over which federal policy makers actually have some control. The Federal Reserve and other federal regulators should aim to avoid sharp declines in sales. The Fed can do this by raising or lowering interest rates, changing the money supply, and targeting changes in prices and nominal economic activity. Federal regulators can make sure that stable lending conditions are maintained, or not.One reasonthe Great Recession was so bad was that Federal Reserve officials and other federal regulators, generally responding to public sentiment, washed their hands of the horrendous collapse in sales and left homebuilders and sellers out to dry.</p><p><blockquote>联邦政策制定者实际上可以控制对新房的需求。美联储和其他联邦监管机构应致力于避免销售额急剧下降。美联储可以通过提高或降低利率、改变货币供应量以及瞄准价格和名义经济活动的变化来做到这一点。联邦监管机构可以确保保持稳定的贷款条件,也可以不保持稳定。大衰退如此严重的一个原因是,美联储官员和其他联邦监管机构通常会对公众情绪做出反应,对可怕的销售崩溃置之不理,让房屋建筑商和销售商自生自灭。</blockquote></p><p> But even in that worst-case scenario, the 2000s market was much more resilient than it seemed. In July 2005, when buyers backed off and months of inventory started to surge, the median U.S. home price was $198,000, according toZillow. In July 2008, when months of inventory was near its peak, it was still at $199,000.</p><p><blockquote>但即使在最坏的情况下,2000 年代的市场也比看起来更有弹性。据 toZillow 称,2005 年 7 月,当买家退出,几个月的库存开始激增时,美国房价中值为 198,000 美元。2008 年 7 月,当几个月的库存接近峰值时,库存仍处于 19.9 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> At the June 2006 Federal Reserve meeting, Ben Bernanke said, “It is a good thing that housing is cooling. If we could wave a magic wand and reinstate 2005, we wouldn’t want to do that.” It’s notable that Jerome Powell, who today holds Bernanke’s former position as Fed chair, isn’t openly pining for a “cooler” housing market.</p><p><blockquote>在 2006 年 6 月的美联储会议上,本-伯南克说:“房地产降温是件好事。如果我们能挥舞魔杖,恢复 2005 年,我们就不想这么做了。”值得注意的是,如今接替伯南克担任美联储主席的杰罗姆-鲍威尔(Jerome Powell)并没有公开渴望 “降温 ”的房地产市场。</blockquote></p><p> There is a common belief that before the Great Recession, homebuyers were taken in by themyththat home prices never go down, and they became complacent. Those buyers turned out to be wrong. Yet, even when a concerted effort to kill housing markets succeeded, we had to beat them into submission for three full years before prices relented. Home prices can go down, but we have to work very hard, together, for a long time, to make them fall.</p><p><blockquote>人们普遍认为,在大衰退之前,购房者被房价永远不会下跌的神话所迷惑,他们变得自满。那些买家被证明是错的。然而,即使在扼杀房地产市场的共同努力取得成功时,我们也不得不让它们屈服整整三年,房价才有所缓和。房价可能会下跌,但我们必须非常努力地工作,一起工作很长时间,才能让房价下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> If you are a buyer in a hot market where home prices are 30% higher than they were a year ago, you’re getting a 30% worse deal than you could have had back then. Nothing can be done about that. That said, the main things to be concerned with are the factors federal policymakers are in control of. There is little reason to expect housing demand to collapse. If it does, it will require communal intention—federal monetary and credit policies meant to create or accept a sharp drop in demand. And even if federal officials intend for housing construction to collapse, history suggests that a market contraction would push new sales down deeply for an extended period of time before prices relent.</p><p><blockquote>如果你是一个热门市场的买家,房价比一年前高出 30%,那么你得到的交易将比当时差 30%。对此无能为力。也就是说,主要关注的是联邦政策制定者可以控制的因素。几乎没有理由预期住房需求会崩溃。如果发生这种情况,它将需要公共意图——联邦货币和信贷政策旨在创造或接受需求的急剧下降。即使联邦官员希望住房建设崩溃,历史表明,在价格回落之前,市场萎缩将在很长一段时间内推动新销售大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/housing-prices-market-crash-51624912461?siteid=yhoof2\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/housing-prices-market-crash-51624912461?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187567340","content_text":"There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices have appreciated by well more than 10% over the past year. This naturally leads to a concern about market volatility: Must what goes up comedown? Are werepeatingthe excesses of the early 2000s, when housing prices surged before the market crashed?\nSome analysts argue that this time, it’s even less likely that prices will fall.Inventoriesof new homes for sale are very low, and lending standards are much tighter than in 2005. This is true. In fact, the ground is even firmer than it seems.\nNew home inventories were very high before the Great Recession. Today, they are closer to the level that has been common for decades. The portion of inventory built and ready for move-in is especially low because of supply chain interruptions combined with a sudden boost of demand during the coronavirus pandemic. We shouldn’t worry much about a crash when buyers are eagerly snapping up the available homes.\nYet there’s another reason to believe a housing crash is unlikely: Even the high level of inventory in 2005 wasn’t nearly as speculative as most people think. Understanding why will help us interpret today’s market.\nIn 2005, homes were being built because sales were high, and sales were high in parts of the country where demand was strong. Builders were conservatively scaling their inventories with rising sales. The same is true today.\nFrequently, analysts cite the sharp rise in months of inventory—the number of months it will take to sell the current supply of homes being constructed for sale, at the current sales rate—as evidence of overzealous building during the last boom. But timing is key here. Decades of experience tell a clear story: Months of inventory is mostly a function of sales rather than builder speculation. When sales are strong, homes are turning over, and months of inventory tend to stay low. When sales quickly decline, builders tend to be left with unexpectedly high inventory.\nFrom the late 1990s all the way up to the peak of new home sales in mid-2005,inventory was at historic lows, with about four months’ worth remaining. Of course, builders were creating more inventory to match growing sales, but it was barely enough to keep up with demand, so the number held fairly constant. Then, as economic growth started to slow, a deep drop in sales coincided with a sharp rise in months of inventory.\nToday, there are also about four months of inventory, and sales are around the same level as they were in the late 1990s. So, while it’s easy to look at on-the-ground activity and conclude that low inventory could cause bidding wars among buyers, we need to remember that buyers are really driving inventory more than the other way around. In other words, builders decide to create new homes when demand is high from buyers. If demand suddenly dries up, builders can’t suddenly make the inventory of homes under construction disappear.\nDemand for new homes is something over which federal policy makers actually have some control. The Federal Reserve and other federal regulators should aim to avoid sharp declines in sales. The Fed can do this by raising or lowering interest rates, changing the money supply, and targeting changes in prices and nominal economic activity. Federal regulators can make sure that stable lending conditions are maintained, or not.One reasonthe Great Recession was so bad was that Federal Reserve officials and other federal regulators, generally responding to public sentiment, washed their hands of the horrendous collapse in sales and left homebuilders and sellers out to dry.\nBut even in that worst-case scenario, the 2000s market was much more resilient than it seemed. In July 2005, when buyers backed off and months of inventory started to surge, the median U.S. home price was $198,000, according toZillow. In July 2008, when months of inventory was near its peak, it was still at $199,000.\nAt the June 2006 Federal Reserve meeting, Ben Bernanke said, “It is a good thing that housing is cooling. If we could wave a magic wand and reinstate 2005, we wouldn’t want to do that.” It’s notable that Jerome Powell, who today holds Bernanke’s former position as Fed chair, isn’t openly pining for a “cooler” housing market.\nThere is a common belief that before the Great Recession, homebuyers were taken in by themyththat home prices never go down, and they became complacent. Those buyers turned out to be wrong. Yet, even when a concerted effort to kill housing markets succeeded, we had to beat them into submission for three full years before prices relented. Home prices can go down, but we have to work very hard, together, for a long time, to make them fall.\nIf you are a buyer in a hot market where home prices are 30% higher than they were a year ago, you’re getting a 30% worse deal than you could have had back then. Nothing can be done about that. That said, the main things to be concerned with are the factors federal policymakers are in control of. There is little reason to expect housing demand to collapse. If it does, it will require communal intention—federal monetary and credit policies meant to create or accept a sharp drop in demand. And even if federal officials intend for housing construction to collapse, history suggests that a market contraction would push new sales down deeply for an extended period of time before prices relent.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2599,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153869791,"gmtCreate":1625017501113,"gmtModify":1633945804180,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"☺️","listText":"☺️","text":"☺️","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153869791","repostId":"1122418477","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2418,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159237131,"gmtCreate":1624969433023,"gmtModify":1633946425470,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">$Virgin Galactic(SPCE)$</a>[Smile] ","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">$Virgin Galactic(SPCE)$</a>[Smile] ","text":"$Virgin Galactic(SPCE)$[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/159237131","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2238,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159236388,"gmtCreate":1624969117744,"gmtModify":1633946428978,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"let’s go! 🙌🏽","listText":"let’s go! 🙌🏽","text":"let’s go! 🙌🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/159236388","repostId":"1128482198","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":599,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190079365,"gmtCreate":1620560872857,"gmtModify":1634198029343,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"💪🏽","listText":"💪🏽","text":"💪🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/190079365","repostId":"1193602237","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193602237","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620471120,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1193602237?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-08 18:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. hiring takes big step back as businesses scramble for workers, raw materials<blockquote>随着企业争夺工人和原材料,美国招聘大幅倒退</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193602237","media":"reuters","summary":"U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in dema","content":"<p>U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in demand, unleashed by the reopening of the economy amid rapidly improving public health and massive financial help from the government.</p><p><blockquote>美国雇主可能在 4 月份雇佣了近 100 万名工人,因为他们急于满足需求激增,这是在公共卫生迅速改善和政府提供大量财政援助的情况下经济重新开放所释放的。</blockquote></p><p>The Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Friday will be the first to show the impact of the White House's $1.9 trillion COVID-19 pandemic rescue package, which was approved in March. It is likely to show the economy entered the second quarter with even greater momentum, firmly putting it on track this year for its best performance in almost four decades.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周五发布的备受关注的就业报告将首次显示白宫 3 月份批准的 1.9 万亿美元 COVID-19 大流行救助计划的影响。这可能表明经济以更大的势头进入第二季度,坚定地走上了今年近四十年来最好表现的轨道。</blockquote></p><p>\"We are looking for a pretty good figure, reflecting the ongoing reopening we have seen,\" said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING in New York. \"With cash in people's pockets, economic activity is looking good and that should lead to more and more hiring right across the economy.\"</p><p><blockquote>荷兰国际集团驻纽约首席国际经济学家詹姆斯·奈特利表示:“我们正在寻找一个相当不错的数字,反映我们所看到的正在进行的重新开放。”“随着人们口袋里有了现金,经济活动看起来不错,这应该会导致整个经济中越来越多的招聘。”</blockquote></p><p>According to a Reuters survey of economists, nonfarm payrolls likely increased by 978,000 jobs last month after rising by 916,000 in March. That would leave employment about 7.5 million jobs below its peak in February 2020.</p><p><blockquote>根据路透社对经济学家的调查,继3月份增加91.6万个之后,上个月非农就业人数可能增加97.8万个。这将使就业人数比 2020 年 2 月的峰值低约 750 万个。</blockquote></p><p>Twelve months ago, the economy purged a record 20.679 million jobs as it reeled from mandatory closures of nonessential businesses to slow the first wave of COVID-19 infections.</p><p><blockquote>12 个月前,经济因强制关闭非必要企业以减缓第一波 COVID-19 感染而减少了创纪录的 2067.9 万个工作岗位。</blockquote></p><p>April's payrolls estimates range from as low as 656,000 to as high as 2.1 million jobs. New claims for unemployment benefits have dropped below 500,000 for the first-time since the pandemic started and job cuts announced by U.S.-based employers in April were the lowest in nearly 21 years.</p><p><blockquote>4月份的就业人数估计从低至65.6万人到高达210万人不等。自疫情爆发以来,新申请失业救济人数首次降至 50 万人以下,美国雇主 4 月份宣布的裁员人数为近 21 年来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Also arguing for another month of blockbuster job growth, consumers' perceptions of the labor market are the strongest in 13 months. But the pent-up demand, which contributed to the economy's 6.4% annualized growth pace in the first quarter, the second-fastest since the third quarter of 2003, has triggered shortages of labor and raw materials.</p><p><blockquote>消费者对劳动力市场的看法也是 13 个月来最强劲的,这也表明就业又出现了大幅增长。但被压抑的需求导致了劳动力和原材料短缺,第一季度经济年化增长率为 6.4%,这是自 2003 年第三季度以来的第二快增长率。</blockquote></p><p>From manufacturing to restaurants, employers are scrambling for workers. A range of factors, including parents still at home caring for children, coronavirus-related retirements and generous unemployment checks, are blamed for the labor shortages.</p><p><blockquote>从制造业到餐馆,雇主们都在争抢工人。劳动力短缺被归咎于一系列因素,包括仍在家照顾孩子的父母、与冠状病毒相关的退休和慷慨的失业支票。</blockquote></p><p>\"While we do not expect that lack of workers will weigh noticeably on April employment, rehiring could become more difficult in coming months before expanded unemployment benefits expire in September,\" said Veronica Clark, an economist at Citigroup in New York.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团驻纽约经济学家维罗妮卡·克拉克表示:“虽然我们预计工人短缺不会对 4 月份的就业造成明显影响,但在扩大的失业救济金于 9 月份到期之前,未来几个月重新招聘可能会变得更加困难。”</blockquote></p><p>Payroll gains were likely led by the leisure and hospitality industry as more high-contact businesses such as restaurants, bars and amusement parks reopen. Americans over the age of 16 are now eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, leading states like New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to lift most of their coronavirus capacity restrictions on businesses.</p><p><blockquote>随着餐馆、酒吧和游乐园等更多高接触的企业重新开业,休闲和酒店业可能会推动工资增长。16岁以上的美国人现在有资格接种新冠肺炎疫苗,导致纽约州、新泽西州和康涅狄格州等州取消了对企业的大部分冠状病毒产能限制。</blockquote></p><p>BROAD EMPLOYMENT GAINS</p><p><blockquote>广泛的就业增长</blockquote></p><p>Solid gains were also expected in manufacturing, despite a global semiconductor chip shortage, which has forced motor vehicle manufacturers to cut production. Strong housing demand likely boosted construction payrolls.</p><p><blockquote>尽管全球半导体芯片短缺迫使汽车制造商减产,但预计制造业也将稳步增长。强劲的住房需求可能会推高建筑业就业人数。</blockquote></p><p>Government employment is also expected to have picked up as school districts hired more teachers following the resumption of in-person learning in many states.</p><p><blockquote>随着许多州恢复面对面学习,学区雇佣了更多教师,政府就业预计也会增加。</blockquote></p><p>Robust hiring is unlikely to have an impact on President Joe Biden's plan to spend another $4 trillion on education and childcare, middle- and low-income families, infrastructure and jobs. Neither was it expected to influence monetary policy, with the Federal Reserve having signaled it is prepared to let the economy run hotter than it did in previous cycles.</p><p><blockquote>强劲的招聘不太可能对乔·拜登总统在教育和儿童保育、中低收入家庭、基础设施和就业方面再支出 4 万亿美元的计划产生影响。预计它也不会影响货币政策,美联储已表示准备让经济运行比前几个周期更热。</blockquote></p><p>Millions of Americans remain out of work and many have permanently lost jobs because of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>数百万美国人仍然失业,许多人因为疫情而永久失业。</blockquote></p><p>\"Nobody knows what the economy is going to look like post COVID,\" said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard in New York. \"There is a stubbornly high number of people who have been permanently displaced. The (spending) plans are about giving the economy a higher trajectory of growth so that these people can be hired sooner rather than later.\"</p><p><blockquote>纽约 TS Lombard 首席美国经济学家史蒂文·布利茨 (Steven Blitz) 表示:“没有人知道新冠疫情过后的经济会是什么样子。”“永久流离失所的人数一直居高不下。(支出)计划的目的是让经济走上更高的增长轨迹,以便这些人能够尽早就业。”</blockquote></p><p>The unemployment rate is forecast dropping to 5.8% in April from 6.0% in March. The unemployment rate has been understated by people misclassifying themselves as being \"employed but absent from work.\"</p><p><blockquote>失业率预计将从3月份的6.0%降至4月份的5.8%。人们错误地将自己归类为“有工作但不工作”,从而低估了失业率。</blockquote></p><p>To gauge the recovery, economists will focus on the number of people who have been unemployed for more than six months as well as those out of work because of permanent job losses.</p><p><blockquote>为了衡量经济复苏,经济学家将关注失业超过六个月的人数以及因永久性失业而失业的人数。</blockquote></p><p>The labor force participation rate, or the proportion of working-age Americans who have a job or are looking for one, likely improved last month, though it remained below its pre-pandemic level. More than 4 million people, many of them women, dropped out of the labor force during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>劳动力参与率,即拥有工作或正在寻找工作的工作年龄美国人的比例,上个月可能有所改善,尽管仍低于大流行前的水平。在疫情期间,超过400万人,其中许多是妇女,退出了劳动力市场。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>With the lower-wage leisure and hospitality industry expected to dominate employment gains, average hourly earnings were likely unchanged in April after dipping 0.1% in March. That would lead to a 0.4% drop in wages on a year-on-year basis after a 4.2% increase in March.</p><p><blockquote>由于工资较低的休闲和酒店业预计将主导就业增长,平均时薪在3月份下降0.1%后,4月份可能保持不变。这将导致工资在3月份增长4.2%后同比下降0.4%。</blockquote></p><p>\"We will be watching average hourly earnings very closely for signs that difficulty in hiring qualified workers is beginning to boost compensation,\" said David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management in New York.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通资产管理公司(J.P. Morgan Asset Management)驻纽约首席全球策略师大卫·凯利(David Kelly)表示:“我们将密切关注平均时薪,寻找招聘合格工人的困难开始推高薪酬的迹象。”</blockquote></p><p>\"If tightening labor markets boost wage growth, then the inflation bounce which the Fed is anticipating to be modest and transitory could turn out to be stronger and longer-lasting, leading to earlier Fed tightening.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果劳动力市场收紧推动工资增长,那么美联储预计温和且短暂的通胀反弹可能会变得更强劲、更持久,从而导致美联储提前收紧货币政策。”</blockquote></p><p>The anticipated drop in wages will have no impact on consumer spending, with Americans sitting on more than $2 trillion in excess savings. The average workweek was forecast steady at 34.9 hours.</p><p><blockquote>预计工资下降不会对消费者支出产生影响,美国人有超过2万亿美元的超额储蓄。平均工作周预计稳定在34.9小时。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. hiring takes big step back as businesses scramble for workers, raw materials<blockquote>随着企业争夺工人和原材料,美国招聘大幅倒退</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. hiring takes big step back as businesses scramble for workers, raw materials<blockquote>随着企业争夺工人和原材料,美国招聘大幅倒退</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-08 18:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in demand, unleashed by the reopening of the economy amid rapidly improving public health and massive financial help from the government.</p><p><blockquote>美国雇主可能在 4 月份雇佣了近 100 万名工人,因为他们急于满足需求激增,这是在公共卫生迅速改善和政府提供大量财政援助的情况下经济重新开放所释放的。</blockquote></p><p>The Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Friday will be the first to show the impact of the White House's $1.9 trillion COVID-19 pandemic rescue package, which was approved in March. It is likely to show the economy entered the second quarter with even greater momentum, firmly putting it on track this year for its best performance in almost four decades.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周五发布的备受关注的就业报告将首次显示白宫 3 月份批准的 1.9 万亿美元 COVID-19 大流行救助计划的影响。这可能表明经济以更大的势头进入第二季度,坚定地走上了今年近四十年来最好表现的轨道。</blockquote></p><p>\"We are looking for a pretty good figure, reflecting the ongoing reopening we have seen,\" said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING in New York. \"With cash in people's pockets, economic activity is looking good and that should lead to more and more hiring right across the economy.\"</p><p><blockquote>荷兰国际集团驻纽约首席国际经济学家詹姆斯·奈特利表示:“我们正在寻找一个相当不错的数字,反映我们所看到的正在进行的重新开放。”“随着人们口袋里有了现金,经济活动看起来不错,这应该会导致整个经济中越来越多的招聘。”</blockquote></p><p>According to a Reuters survey of economists, nonfarm payrolls likely increased by 978,000 jobs last month after rising by 916,000 in March. That would leave employment about 7.5 million jobs below its peak in February 2020.</p><p><blockquote>根据路透社对经济学家的调查,继3月份增加91.6万个之后,上个月非农就业人数可能增加97.8万个。这将使就业人数比 2020 年 2 月的峰值低约 750 万个。</blockquote></p><p>Twelve months ago, the economy purged a record 20.679 million jobs as it reeled from mandatory closures of nonessential businesses to slow the first wave of COVID-19 infections.</p><p><blockquote>12 个月前,经济因强制关闭非必要企业以减缓第一波 COVID-19 感染而减少了创纪录的 2067.9 万个工作岗位。</blockquote></p><p>April's payrolls estimates range from as low as 656,000 to as high as 2.1 million jobs. New claims for unemployment benefits have dropped below 500,000 for the first-time since the pandemic started and job cuts announced by U.S.-based employers in April were the lowest in nearly 21 years.</p><p><blockquote>4月份的就业人数估计从低至65.6万人到高达210万人不等。自疫情爆发以来,新申请失业救济人数首次降至 50 万人以下,美国雇主 4 月份宣布的裁员人数为近 21 年来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Also arguing for another month of blockbuster job growth, consumers' perceptions of the labor market are the strongest in 13 months. But the pent-up demand, which contributed to the economy's 6.4% annualized growth pace in the first quarter, the second-fastest since the third quarter of 2003, has triggered shortages of labor and raw materials.</p><p><blockquote>消费者对劳动力市场的看法也是 13 个月来最强劲的,这也表明就业又出现了大幅增长。但被压抑的需求导致了劳动力和原材料短缺,第一季度经济年化增长率为 6.4%,这是自 2003 年第三季度以来的第二快增长率。</blockquote></p><p>From manufacturing to restaurants, employers are scrambling for workers. A range of factors, including parents still at home caring for children, coronavirus-related retirements and generous unemployment checks, are blamed for the labor shortages.</p><p><blockquote>从制造业到餐馆,雇主们都在争抢工人。劳动力短缺被归咎于一系列因素,包括仍在家照顾孩子的父母、与冠状病毒相关的退休和慷慨的失业支票。</blockquote></p><p>\"While we do not expect that lack of workers will weigh noticeably on April employment, rehiring could become more difficult in coming months before expanded unemployment benefits expire in September,\" said Veronica Clark, an economist at Citigroup in New York.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团驻纽约经济学家维罗妮卡·克拉克表示:“虽然我们预计工人短缺不会对 4 月份的就业造成明显影响,但在扩大的失业救济金于 9 月份到期之前,未来几个月重新招聘可能会变得更加困难。”</blockquote></p><p>Payroll gains were likely led by the leisure and hospitality industry as more high-contact businesses such as restaurants, bars and amusement parks reopen. Americans over the age of 16 are now eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, leading states like New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to lift most of their coronavirus capacity restrictions on businesses.</p><p><blockquote>随着餐馆、酒吧和游乐园等更多高接触的企业重新开业,休闲和酒店业可能会推动工资增长。16岁以上的美国人现在有资格接种新冠肺炎疫苗,导致纽约州、新泽西州和康涅狄格州等州取消了对企业的大部分冠状病毒产能限制。</blockquote></p><p>BROAD EMPLOYMENT GAINS</p><p><blockquote>广泛的就业增长</blockquote></p><p>Solid gains were also expected in manufacturing, despite a global semiconductor chip shortage, which has forced motor vehicle manufacturers to cut production. Strong housing demand likely boosted construction payrolls.</p><p><blockquote>尽管全球半导体芯片短缺迫使汽车制造商减产,但预计制造业也将稳步增长。强劲的住房需求可能会推高建筑业就业人数。</blockquote></p><p>Government employment is also expected to have picked up as school districts hired more teachers following the resumption of in-person learning in many states.</p><p><blockquote>随着许多州恢复面对面学习,学区雇佣了更多教师,政府就业预计也会增加。</blockquote></p><p>Robust hiring is unlikely to have an impact on President Joe Biden's plan to spend another $4 trillion on education and childcare, middle- and low-income families, infrastructure and jobs. Neither was it expected to influence monetary policy, with the Federal Reserve having signaled it is prepared to let the economy run hotter than it did in previous cycles.</p><p><blockquote>强劲的招聘不太可能对乔·拜登总统在教育和儿童保育、中低收入家庭、基础设施和就业方面再支出 4 万亿美元的计划产生影响。预计它也不会影响货币政策,美联储已表示准备让经济运行比前几个周期更热。</blockquote></p><p>Millions of Americans remain out of work and many have permanently lost jobs because of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>数百万美国人仍然失业,许多人因为疫情而永久失业。</blockquote></p><p>\"Nobody knows what the economy is going to look like post COVID,\" said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard in New York. \"There is a stubbornly high number of people who have been permanently displaced. The (spending) plans are about giving the economy a higher trajectory of growth so that these people can be hired sooner rather than later.\"</p><p><blockquote>纽约 TS Lombard 首席美国经济学家史蒂文·布利茨 (Steven Blitz) 表示:“没有人知道新冠疫情过后的经济会是什么样子。”“永久流离失所的人数一直居高不下。(支出)计划的目的是让经济走上更高的增长轨迹,以便这些人能够尽早就业。”</blockquote></p><p>The unemployment rate is forecast dropping to 5.8% in April from 6.0% in March. The unemployment rate has been understated by people misclassifying themselves as being \"employed but absent from work.\"</p><p><blockquote>失业率预计将从3月份的6.0%降至4月份的5.8%。人们错误地将自己归类为“有工作但不工作”,从而低估了失业率。</blockquote></p><p>To gauge the recovery, economists will focus on the number of people who have been unemployed for more than six months as well as those out of work because of permanent job losses.</p><p><blockquote>为了衡量经济复苏,经济学家将关注失业超过六个月的人数以及因永久性失业而失业的人数。</blockquote></p><p>The labor force participation rate, or the proportion of working-age Americans who have a job or are looking for one, likely improved last month, though it remained below its pre-pandemic level. More than 4 million people, many of them women, dropped out of the labor force during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>劳动力参与率,即拥有工作或正在寻找工作的工作年龄美国人的比例,上个月可能有所改善,尽管仍低于大流行前的水平。在疫情期间,超过400万人,其中许多是妇女,退出了劳动力市场。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>With the lower-wage leisure and hospitality industry expected to dominate employment gains, average hourly earnings were likely unchanged in April after dipping 0.1% in March. That would lead to a 0.4% drop in wages on a year-on-year basis after a 4.2% increase in March.</p><p><blockquote>由于工资较低的休闲和酒店业预计将主导就业增长,平均时薪在3月份下降0.1%后,4月份可能保持不变。这将导致工资在3月份增长4.2%后同比下降0.4%。</blockquote></p><p>\"We will be watching average hourly earnings very closely for signs that difficulty in hiring qualified workers is beginning to boost compensation,\" said David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management in New York.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通资产管理公司(J.P. Morgan Asset Management)驻纽约首席全球策略师大卫·凯利(David Kelly)表示:“我们将密切关注平均时薪,寻找招聘合格工人的困难开始推高薪酬的迹象。”</blockquote></p><p>\"If tightening labor markets boost wage growth, then the inflation bounce which the Fed is anticipating to be modest and transitory could turn out to be stronger and longer-lasting, leading to earlier Fed tightening.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果劳动力市场收紧推动工资增长,那么美联储预计温和且短暂的通胀反弹可能会变得更强劲、更持久,从而导致美联储提前收紧货币政策。”</blockquote></p><p>The anticipated drop in wages will have no impact on consumer spending, with Americans sitting on more than $2 trillion in excess savings. The average workweek was forecast steady at 34.9 hours.</p><p><blockquote>预计工资下降不会对消费者支出产生影响,美国人有超过2万亿美元的超额储蓄。平均工作周预计稳定在34.9小时。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/markets\">reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/markets","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193602237","content_text":"U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in demand, unleashed by the reopening of the economy amid rapidly improving public health and massive financial help from the government.The Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Friday will be the first to show the impact of the White House's $1.9 trillion COVID-19 pandemic rescue package, which was approved in March. It is likely to show the economy entered the second quarter with even greater momentum, firmly putting it on track this year for its best performance in almost four decades.\"We are looking for a pretty good figure, reflecting the ongoing reopening we have seen,\" said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING in New York. \"With cash in people's pockets, economic activity is looking good and that should lead to more and more hiring right across the economy.\"According to a Reuters survey of economists, nonfarm payrolls likely increased by 978,000 jobs last month after rising by 916,000 in March. That would leave employment about 7.5 million jobs below its peak in February 2020.Twelve months ago, the economy purged a record 20.679 million jobs as it reeled from mandatory closures of nonessential businesses to slow the first wave of COVID-19 infections.April's payrolls estimates range from as low as 656,000 to as high as 2.1 million jobs. New claims for unemployment benefits have dropped below 500,000 for the first-time since the pandemic started and job cuts announced by U.S.-based employers in April were the lowest in nearly 21 years.Also arguing for another month of blockbuster job growth, consumers' perceptions of the labor market are the strongest in 13 months. But the pent-up demand, which contributed to the economy's 6.4% annualized growth pace in the first quarter, the second-fastest since the third quarter of 2003, has triggered shortages of labor and raw materials.From manufacturing to restaurants, employers are scrambling for workers. A range of factors, including parents still at home caring for children, coronavirus-related retirements and generous unemployment checks, are blamed for the labor shortages.\"While we do not expect that lack of workers will weigh noticeably on April employment, rehiring could become more difficult in coming months before expanded unemployment benefits expire in September,\" said Veronica Clark, an economist at Citigroup in New York.Payroll gains were likely led by the leisure and hospitality industry as more high-contact businesses such as restaurants, bars and amusement parks reopen. Americans over the age of 16 are now eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, leading states like New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to lift most of their coronavirus capacity restrictions on businesses.BROAD EMPLOYMENT GAINSSolid gains were also expected in manufacturing, despite a global semiconductor chip shortage, which has forced motor vehicle manufacturers to cut production. Strong housing demand likely boosted construction payrolls.Government employment is also expected to have picked up as school districts hired more teachers following the resumption of in-person learning in many states.Robust hiring is unlikely to have an impact on President Joe Biden's plan to spend another $4 trillion on education and childcare, middle- and low-income families, infrastructure and jobs. Neither was it expected to influence monetary policy, with the Federal Reserve having signaled it is prepared to let the economy run hotter than it did in previous cycles.Millions of Americans remain out of work and many have permanently lost jobs because of the pandemic.\"Nobody knows what the economy is going to look like post COVID,\" said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard in New York. \"There is a stubbornly high number of people who have been permanently displaced. The (spending) plans are about giving the economy a higher trajectory of growth so that these people can be hired sooner rather than later.\"The unemployment rate is forecast dropping to 5.8% in April from 6.0% in March. The unemployment rate has been understated by people misclassifying themselves as being \"employed but absent from work.\"To gauge the recovery, economists will focus on the number of people who have been unemployed for more than six months as well as those out of work because of permanent job losses.The labor force participation rate, or the proportion of working-age Americans who have a job or are looking for one, likely improved last month, though it remained below its pre-pandemic level. More than 4 million people, many of them women, dropped out of the labor force during the pandemic.With the lower-wage leisure and hospitality industry expected to dominate employment gains, average hourly earnings were likely unchanged in April after dipping 0.1% in March. That would lead to a 0.4% drop in wages on a year-on-year basis after a 4.2% increase in March.\"We will be watching average hourly earnings very closely for signs that difficulty in hiring qualified workers is beginning to boost compensation,\" said David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management in New York.\"If tightening labor markets boost wage growth, then the inflation bounce which the Fed is anticipating to be modest and transitory could turn out to be stronger and longer-lasting, leading to earlier Fed tightening.\"The anticipated drop in wages will have no impact on consumer spending, with Americans sitting on more than $2 trillion in excess savings. The average workweek was forecast steady at 34.9 hours.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":696,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":343570576,"gmtCreate":1617733613495,"gmtModify":1634296848200,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"🙌🏽","listText":"🙌🏽","text":"🙌🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/343570576","repostId":"2125671391","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":726,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349479666,"gmtCreate":1617634793155,"gmtModify":1634297401382,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"🙌🏽","listText":"🙌🏽","text":"🙌🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/349479666","repostId":"2125579247","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2125579247","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1617621115,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2125579247?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-05 19:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is The Era Of Meme Stocks And NFTs Already Over?<blockquote>迷因股票和NFT的时代已经结束了吗?</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2125579247","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-fr","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be46311cd2d33d0e3917aaedb8a121dc\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-free trading platforms, leading to an exuberant rise in prices this year.</p><p><blockquote>由于有了过多的刺激资金和时间,人们的注意力转向了免佣金交易平台,导致今年价格大幅上涨。</blockquote></p><p>Now, with vaccines rolling out, final stimulus checks being spent and warm weather returning, attention is returning to socializing and traveling.</p><p><blockquote>现在,随着疫苗的推出,最终刺激支票的使用和温暖天气的回归,注意力又回到了社交和旅行上。</blockquote></p><p><b>Memes Fall Flat</b>: So goes the explanation for why prices in meme stocks have been flat since the frenzy reached fever pitch in late January, according to Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote><b>表情包落平</b>据彭博社报道,这也解释了为什么自 1 月下旬狂热达到白热化以来,模因股票价格一直持平。</blockquote></p><p>Searches for “Google flights” reached their a popularity score of 100 (the highest possible for a given period of time) in the past week, while searches for phrases like “stock trading” and “investing” have plunged, Bloomberg said, citing Google Trends data.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社援引谷歌趋势数据称,过去一周,“谷歌航班 ”的搜索量达到了 100 分(在特定时间段内可能达到的最高分),而 “股票交易 ”和 “投资 ”等短语的搜索量则大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p>“The stimulus check impact on retail trading is waning,” Bloomberg quoted Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, as saying. “Many Americans are looking to go big on attending sporting events, traveling across the country, vacationing, visiting family and friends, and revamping wardrobes before going out to restaurants, pubs and returning to the office.”</p><p><blockquote>“彭博社援引 Oanda 高级市场分析师爱德华-莫亚(Edward Moya)的话说:”刺激措施对零售交易的影响正在减弱。“许多美国人都希望参加体育赛事、在全国各地旅行、度假、拜访家人和朋友,并在外出就餐、酒吧和回到办公室之前改造衣橱。”</blockquote></p><p>Retail traders accounted for nearly 25% of trading activity in the past year, up from an average of about 10% over the decade prior to the pandemic, Benzinga noted two weeks ago, citing Goldman Sachs.</p><p><blockquote>Benzinga 两周前援引高盛的话指出,过去一年,零售交易者占交易活动的近 25%,高于疫情爆发前十年的平均约 10%。</blockquote></p><p><b>NFT Prices Plunge</b>: Meanwhile, interest in another source of exuberance, non-fungible tokens, appears to be on the wane as well, just weeks after the $69.3 million Beeple artwork sale brought the digital innovation to the world's attention.</p><p><blockquote><b>NFT价格暴跌</b>与此同时,人们对另一个繁荣来源——不可替代代币——的兴趣似乎也在减弱,就在 6930 万美元的 Beeple 艺术品拍卖让数字创新引起了全世界的关注几周后。</blockquote></p><p>Average prices for NFTs peaked in February at about $1,400 but have fallen by almost 70% since then, according to Bloomberg, using data from NFT market-tracker Nonfungible.com.</p><p><blockquote>根据彭博社使用 NFT 市场跟踪器 Nonfungible.com 的数据,NFT 的平均价格在 2 月份达到约 1,400 美元的峰值,但此后已下跌近 70%。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin.com noted a decline in interest in NTFs. The site said search terms for NFTs have been falling since mid-March highs on Google in the U.S. and worldwide, though the numbers still remain high, mostly in the 90s.</p><p><blockquote>Bitcoin.com 注意到人们对 NTF 的兴趣有所下降。该网站表示,自3月中旬谷歌在美国和全球范围内的高点以来,NFT的搜索词一直在下降,尽管数字仍然很高,大部分在90年代。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin quoted an author who's written on NFTs saying that the market suffers from an oversupply as more people realize how easy NFTs are to create.</p><p><blockquote>比特币援引一位撰写 NFT 文章的作者的话说,随着越来越多的人意识到 NFT 是多么容易创建,市场正遭受供应过剩的困扰。</blockquote></p><p>NFTs are not likely to go away, as they represent a new innovation with promising uses for proving ownership and tracking ownership history, as well as for people's online identities.</p><p><blockquote>NFT不太可能消失,因为它们代表了一种新的创新,在证明所有权和跟踪所有权历史以及人们的在线身份方面有很好的用途。</blockquote></p><p>But the fall in prices suggests the recent boom was a temporary rush of excitement for a concept that's still taking shape.</p><p><blockquote>但价格下跌表明,最近的繁荣只是对一个仍在形成的概念的暂时兴奋。</blockquote></p><p>Before long, the meme stocks and NFTs of early 2021 may appear in retrospect to have been nothing more than the oddities of a feverish pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>不久之后,回想起来,2021 年初的模因股票和 NFT 可能只不过是狂热大流行的怪异之处。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is The Era Of Meme Stocks And NFTs Already Over?<blockquote>迷因股票和NFT的时代已经结束了吗?</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs The Era Of Meme Stocks And NFTs Already Over?<blockquote>迷因股票和NFT的时代已经结束了吗?</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-05 19:11</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be46311cd2d33d0e3917aaedb8a121dc\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-free trading platforms, leading to an exuberant rise in prices this year.</p><p><blockquote>由于有了过多的刺激资金和时间,人们的注意力转向了免佣金交易平台,导致今年价格大幅上涨。</blockquote></p><p>Now, with vaccines rolling out, final stimulus checks being spent and warm weather returning, attention is returning to socializing and traveling.</p><p><blockquote>现在,随着疫苗的推出,最终刺激支票的使用和温暖天气的回归,注意力又回到了社交和旅行上。</blockquote></p><p><b>Memes Fall Flat</b>: So goes the explanation for why prices in meme stocks have been flat since the frenzy reached fever pitch in late January, according to Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote><b>表情包落平</b>据彭博社报道,这也解释了为什么自 1 月下旬狂热达到白热化以来,模因股票价格一直持平。</blockquote></p><p>Searches for “Google flights” reached their a popularity score of 100 (the highest possible for a given period of time) in the past week, while searches for phrases like “stock trading” and “investing” have plunged, Bloomberg said, citing Google Trends data.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社援引谷歌趋势数据称,过去一周,“谷歌航班 ”的搜索量达到了 100 分(在特定时间段内可能达到的最高分),而 “股票交易 ”和 “投资 ”等短语的搜索量则大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p>“The stimulus check impact on retail trading is waning,” Bloomberg quoted Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, as saying. “Many Americans are looking to go big on attending sporting events, traveling across the country, vacationing, visiting family and friends, and revamping wardrobes before going out to restaurants, pubs and returning to the office.”</p><p><blockquote>“彭博社援引 Oanda 高级市场分析师爱德华-莫亚(Edward Moya)的话说:”刺激措施对零售交易的影响正在减弱。“许多美国人都希望参加体育赛事、在全国各地旅行、度假、拜访家人和朋友,并在外出就餐、酒吧和回到办公室之前改造衣橱。”</blockquote></p><p>Retail traders accounted for nearly 25% of trading activity in the past year, up from an average of about 10% over the decade prior to the pandemic, Benzinga noted two weeks ago, citing Goldman Sachs.</p><p><blockquote>Benzinga 两周前援引高盛的话指出,过去一年,零售交易者占交易活动的近 25%,高于疫情爆发前十年的平均约 10%。</blockquote></p><p><b>NFT Prices Plunge</b>: Meanwhile, interest in another source of exuberance, non-fungible tokens, appears to be on the wane as well, just weeks after the $69.3 million Beeple artwork sale brought the digital innovation to the world's attention.</p><p><blockquote><b>NFT价格暴跌</b>与此同时,人们对另一个繁荣来源——不可替代代币——的兴趣似乎也在减弱,就在 6930 万美元的 Beeple 艺术品拍卖让数字创新引起了全世界的关注几周后。</blockquote></p><p>Average prices for NFTs peaked in February at about $1,400 but have fallen by almost 70% since then, according to Bloomberg, using data from NFT market-tracker Nonfungible.com.</p><p><blockquote>根据彭博社使用 NFT 市场跟踪器 Nonfungible.com 的数据,NFT 的平均价格在 2 月份达到约 1,400 美元的峰值,但此后已下跌近 70%。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin.com noted a decline in interest in NTFs. The site said search terms for NFTs have been falling since mid-March highs on Google in the U.S. and worldwide, though the numbers still remain high, mostly in the 90s.</p><p><blockquote>Bitcoin.com 注意到人们对 NTF 的兴趣有所下降。该网站表示,自3月中旬谷歌在美国和全球范围内的高点以来,NFT的搜索词一直在下降,尽管数字仍然很高,大部分在90年代。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin quoted an author who's written on NFTs saying that the market suffers from an oversupply as more people realize how easy NFTs are to create.</p><p><blockquote>比特币援引一位撰写 NFT 文章的作者的话说,随着越来越多的人意识到 NFT 是多么容易创建,市场正遭受供应过剩的困扰。</blockquote></p><p>NFTs are not likely to go away, as they represent a new innovation with promising uses for proving ownership and tracking ownership history, as well as for people's online identities.</p><p><blockquote>NFT不太可能消失,因为它们代表了一种新的创新,在证明所有权和跟踪所有权历史以及人们的在线身份方面有很好的用途。</blockquote></p><p>But the fall in prices suggests the recent boom was a temporary rush of excitement for a concept that's still taking shape.</p><p><blockquote>但价格下跌表明,最近的繁荣只是对一个仍在形成的概念的暂时兴奋。</blockquote></p><p>Before long, the meme stocks and NFTs of early 2021 may appear in retrospect to have been nothing more than the oddities of a feverish pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>不久之后,回想起来,2021 年初的模因股票和 NFT 可能只不过是狂热大流行的怪异之处。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/acc24e12c653fec8b3649aea7072da90","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","GOOGL":"谷歌A",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","09086":"华夏纳指-U","03086":"华夏纳指",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","GOOG":"谷歌"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2125579247","content_text":"With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-free trading platforms, leading to an exuberant rise in prices this year.Now, with vaccines rolling out, final stimulus checks being spent and warm weather returning, attention is returning to socializing and traveling.Memes Fall Flat: So goes the explanation for why prices in meme stocks have been flat since the frenzy reached fever pitch in late January, according to Bloomberg.Searches for “Google flights” reached their a popularity score of 100 (the highest possible for a given period of time) in the past week, while searches for phrases like “stock trading” and “investing” have plunged, Bloomberg said, citing Google Trends data.“The stimulus check impact on retail trading is waning,” Bloomberg quoted Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, as saying. “Many Americans are looking to go big on attending sporting events, traveling across the country, vacationing, visiting family and friends, and revamping wardrobes before going out to restaurants, pubs and returning to the office.”Retail traders accounted for nearly 25% of trading activity in the past year, up from an average of about 10% over the decade prior to the pandemic, Benzinga noted two weeks ago, citing Goldman Sachs.NFT Prices Plunge: Meanwhile, interest in another source of exuberance, non-fungible tokens, appears to be on the wane as well, just weeks after the $69.3 million Beeple artwork sale brought the digital innovation to the world's attention.Average prices for NFTs peaked in February at about $1,400 but have fallen by almost 70% since then, according to Bloomberg, using data from NFT market-tracker Nonfungible.com.Bitcoin.com noted a decline in interest in NTFs. The site said search terms for NFTs have been falling since mid-March highs on Google in the U.S. and worldwide, though the numbers still remain high, mostly in the 90s.Bitcoin quoted an author who's written on NFTs saying that the market suffers from an oversupply as more people realize how easy NFTs are to create.NFTs are not likely to go away, as they represent a new innovation with promising uses for proving ownership and tracking ownership history, as well as for people's online identities.But the fall in prices suggests the recent boom was a temporary rush of excitement for a concept that's still taking shape.Before long, the meme stocks and NFTs of early 2021 may appear in retrospect to have been nothing more than the oddities of a feverish pandemic.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9,"09086":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"03086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":739,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355385040,"gmtCreate":1617028776280,"gmtModify":1634523030173,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"HODL","listText":"HODL","text":"HODL","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355385040","repostId":"1175442122","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1175442122","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617013376,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1175442122?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-29 18:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"When Will AMC Entertainment and GameStop Be Profitable?<blockquote>AMC院线和游戏驿站什么时候才能盈利?</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175442122","media":"nasdaq","summary":"Investing in the stock market can be quite the adventure. Last year, the volatility brought about by","content":"<p>Investing in the stock market can be quite the adventure. Last year, the volatility brought about by the coronavirus pandemic led to the quickest decline of more than 30% in the<b>S&P 500</b>'s storied history, as well as the fastest rebound back to all-time highs.</p><p><blockquote>投资股票市场可能是相当冒险的。去年,冠状病毒大流行带来的波动导致了30%以上的最快下降<b>标普500</b>的传奇历史,以及最快反弹至历史高点。</blockquote></p><p> In 2021, an unexpected catalyst has taken over as a key market driver:retail investors.</p><p><blockquote>2021 年,一个意想不到的催化剂成为关键的市场驱动力:散户投资者。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The important question retail investors should be asking about AMC and GameStop</b></p><p><blockquote><b>散户投资者应该问的关于 AMC 和游戏驿站的重要问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Beginning in mid-January, retail investors from Reddit's WallStreetBets chat room began banding together to buy shares and out-of-the-money call options in companies with high levels of short interest (i.e., stocks where a lot of investors are betting on a share price decline). Both video game and accessories retailer<b>GameStop</b>(NYSE: GME)and movie theater chain<b>AMC Entertainment</b>(NYSE: AMC)fit the bill. GameStop was the most short-sold stock of any publicly traded company, with AMC also heavily short-sold and sporting a penny stock share price (which is itself a major lure for young retail investors).</p><p><blockquote>从 1 月中旬开始,Reddit 的 WallStreetBets 聊天室的散户投资者开始联合起来购买空头兴趣较高的公司的股票和价外看涨期权期权(即许多投资者押注股价下跌的股票)。电子游戏及配件零售商<b>游戏驿站</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:GME)和连锁电影院<b>AMC院线</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:AMC)符合要求。游戏驿站是所有上市公司中被卖空最多的股票,AMC 也被大量卖空,并且股价很低(这本身就是对年轻散户投资者的主要诱惑)。</blockquote></p><p> Without getting too far into the weeds, the goal of these retail investors was to effect ashort squeezeand put a hurting on the so-called big money. Institutional investors and hedge funds are the primary holders of short positions. By creating a short squeeze, retail investors sent pessimists fleeing for the exit, further vaulting companies like GameStop and AMC to the upside.</p><p><blockquote>在不深入研究杂草的情况下,这些散户投资者的目标是实现空头挤压,并损害所谓的大资金。机构投资者和对冲基金是空头头寸的主要持有者。通过制造空头挤压,散户投资者让悲观主义者逃离退出,进一步推动游戏驿站和 AMC 等公司上涨。</blockquote></p><p> But tenured investors are also keenly aware that a company's operating performancematters far more than any short-term euphoria. With short-squeezes highly unlikely to support GameStop's or AMC's market valuations over the long run, the question becomes this: When will these turnaround candidates be profitable?</p><p><blockquote>但终身投资者也敏锐地意识到,公司的经营业绩远比任何短期兴奋更重要。从长远来看,空头挤压不太可能支撑 GameStop 或 AMC 的市场估值,因此问题变成了:这些扭亏为盈的候选人何时才能盈利?</blockquote></p><p> Let's take a closer look.</p><p><blockquote>让我们仔细看看。</blockquote></p><p> GameStop's multiyear transformation is a work in progress</p><p><blockquote>GameStop 的多年转型正在进行中</blockquote></p><p> To get the obvious out of the way, GameStop endured a rough 2020 because of the pandemic. Some of its stores were closed, with others seeing dramatically reduced foot traffic. This did not help an already struggling company.</p><p><blockquote>为了避免显而易见的事情,游戏驿站因为疫情经历了艰难的2020年。它的一些商店关闭了,其他商店的客流量急剧下降。这对一家已经陷入困境的公司没有帮助。</blockquote></p><p> The problem for GameStop is thatit's a victim of its own success. Over two decades, it became one of the dominant retailers of new and used video games, consoles, and accessories. The used game market, which allowed the company to repurchase and resell physical games, was an especially lucrative venture for the company. With things going so well for so long, management continued down the same path.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站的问题在于它是自己成功的受害者。二十多年来,它成为新的和二手视频游戏、游戏机和配件的主要零售商之一。二手游戏市场允许公司回购和转售实体游戏,对公司来说是一项特别有利可图的业务。事情进展如此顺利,管理层继续沿着同样的道路前进。</blockquote></p><p> However, this success came to an abrupt halt a few years ago. With gamers steadily shifting to digital platforms, GameStop's brick-and-mortar empire quickly transformed from an asset to a liability. Despite its best efforts to promote digital gaming -- GameStop's e-commerce sales in 2020 grew by 191% -- total revenue last yeardeclined by 21%, with the company shuttering 12% of its stores.</p><p><blockquote>然而,这种成功在几年前戛然而止。随着游戏玩家稳步转向数字平台,GameStop的实体帝国迅速从资产转变为负债。尽管 GameStop 尽了最大努力推广数字游戏,其 2020 年电子商务销售额增长了 191%,但去年总收入下降了 21%,该公司关闭了 12% 的商店。</blockquote></p><p> In order for GameStop to get back into the profit column, it needs to continue to reinvest in digital growth initiatives, while at the same time curbing its spending by closing underperforming stores. Essentially, GameStop is going to back its way into the profit column. Full-year sales will remain relatively stagnant, but the higher margins associated with digital gaming, coupled with lower costs from a smaller store base, should eventually bring GameStop back to profitability.</p><p><blockquote>为了让游戏驿站重返利润行列,它需要继续对数字增长计划进行再投资,同时通过关闭表现不佳的商店来抑制支出。从本质上讲,游戏驿站将重返利润行列。全年销售额将保持相对停滞,但与数字游戏相关的更高利润率,加上较小商店基地的较低成本,最终应该会使游戏驿站恢复盈利。</blockquote></p><p> When might this happen? According to Wall Street's consensus estimates from<b>FactSet</b>, it'll be three more years before GameStop is back in the profit column. If there is a positive here, it's that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) is expected to be positive this year, but EBITDA isn't the same as profitability.</p><p><blockquote>这种情况什么时候会发生?根据华尔街的一致估计<b>事实集</b>游戏驿站还需要三年时间才能重返盈利行列。如果说这里有一个积极的方面,那就是今年的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)预计为正,但EBITDA并不等同于盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> Considering how far GameStop has run, waiting three more years for an estimated $1.25 per share in profitis a tall order.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到游戏驿站已经走了多远,再等三年才能获得估计每股 1.25 美元的利润是一个很高的要求。</blockquote></p><p> <b>AMC's future is murky, at best</b></p><p><blockquote><b>AMC 的未来充其量是黯淡的</b></blockquote></p><p> Compared to AMC Entertainment, GameStop had a cakewalk in 2020. The pandemic shuttered many of AMC's theaters, and most of those thathave reopenedhave capacity-limiting social distancing mandates in place.</p><p><blockquote>与AMC院线相比,游戏驿站在2020年过得很轻松。疫情关闭了AMC的许多影院,大多数重新开放的影院都有限制容量的社交距离规定。</blockquote></p><p> To get back to its glory days, AMC's game plan is to focus on harnessing film exclusivity in its theaters, reducing its debt load, and emphasizing high-margin alternative channels, such as its video on demand service. AMC also needs the pandemic to wrap up in 2021, at least in the United States. The quicker its theaters can return to full capacity, the faster the company can address its most-pressing concerns.</p><p><blockquote>为了重返辉煌岁月,AMC 的游戏计划是专注于利用影院的电影独家发行权,减少债务负担,并强调高利润的替代渠道,例如视频点播服务。AMC 还需要疫情在 2021 年结束,至少在美国是这样。影院越快恢复满负荷运转,公司就能越快解决最紧迫的问题。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But the issues with AMC look far less fixable than what GameStop is contending with.<b>AT&T</b>subsidiary WarnerMedia announced plans torelease all of its films on HBO Maxthe same day they'll hit theaters in 2021.<b>Walt Disney</b>will do the same on its Disney+ streaming platform for a small number of movies. Losing exclusivity on film releases, or having its exclusivity window cut in any meaningful way, would prove devastating to AMC's chances of a successful turnaround.</p><p><blockquote>但 AMC 的问题看起来远不如游戏驿站正在应对的问题那么容易解决。<b>AT&T</b>子公司华纳媒体宣布计划在 2021 年上映的同一天在 HBO Max 上发布其所有电影。<b>华特·迪士尼</b>将在其Disney+流媒体平台上为少量电影做同样的事情。失去电影发行的独家权,或者以任何有意义的方式削减其独家权窗口,都将对 AMC 成功扭亏为盈的机会造成毁灭性打击。</blockquote></p><p> Making matters worse, the company has been forced to leverage itself to the hilt in order to survive. It ended 2020 with $5.7 billion in corporate borrowings, and has been paying north of a 10% interest rate on most of its debt issuances over the past year. Considering how favorable lending rates are for most businesses, a double-digit interest rate shows how distressed AMC's operating model is viewed.</p><p><blockquote>更糟糕的是,为了生存,该公司被迫最大限度地利用自己。截至 2020 年底,该公司的企业借款为 57 亿美元,并且在过去一年中,其大部分债务发行的利率都超过了 10%。考虑到贷款利率对大多数企业来说是多么有利,两位数的利率表明 AMC 的运营模式被视为多么糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> As for when AMC will be profitable, it remains a mystery. Despite an expected doubling of sales in 2021 and 2022, Wall Street's consensus is for AMC to lose $3.25 per share in 2021, lose another $0.97 per share in 2022, and shrink to a per-share loss of $0.60 in 2023. This implies it'll be at least another four years before the company has a shot at becoming profitable.</p><p><blockquote>至于AMC何时才能盈利,仍然是个谜。尽管预计 2021 年和 2022 年销售额将翻一番,但华尔街的共识是 AMC 2021 年每股亏损 3.25 美元,2022 年每股再亏损 0.97 美元,2023 年每股亏损缩小至 0.60 美元。这意味着该公司至少还需要四年时间才能实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> My suspicion is AMC's debtis too much of a crippling factor for this company to succeed. Simply servicing its debt is going to eat up a lot of operating cash flow. Plus, without an influx of new capital via dilutive share offerings or debt issuances, AMClikely doesn't have enough cash to cover its lossesover the next two years.</p><p><blockquote>我怀疑 AMC 的债务对这家公司的成功来说是一个太大的削弱因素。仅仅偿还债务就会消耗大量运营现金流。此外,如果没有通过稀释性股票发行或债务发行吸引新资本,AMCLY 可能没有足够的现金来弥补未来两年的损失。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603171495471","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>When Will AMC Entertainment and GameStop Be Profitable?<blockquote>AMC院线和游戏驿站什么时候才能盈利?</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhen Will AMC Entertainment and GameStop Be Profitable?<blockquote>AMC院线和游戏驿站什么时候才能盈利?</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">nasdaq</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-29 18:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Investing in the stock market can be quite the adventure. Last year, the volatility brought about by the coronavirus pandemic led to the quickest decline of more than 30% in the<b>S&P 500</b>'s storied history, as well as the fastest rebound back to all-time highs.</p><p><blockquote>投资股票市场可能是相当冒险的。去年,冠状病毒大流行带来的波动导致了30%以上的最快下降<b>标普500</b>的传奇历史,以及最快反弹至历史高点。</blockquote></p><p> In 2021, an unexpected catalyst has taken over as a key market driver:retail investors.</p><p><blockquote>2021 年,一个意想不到的催化剂成为关键的市场驱动力:散户投资者。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The important question retail investors should be asking about AMC and GameStop</b></p><p><blockquote><b>散户投资者应该问的关于 AMC 和游戏驿站的重要问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Beginning in mid-January, retail investors from Reddit's WallStreetBets chat room began banding together to buy shares and out-of-the-money call options in companies with high levels of short interest (i.e., stocks where a lot of investors are betting on a share price decline). Both video game and accessories retailer<b>GameStop</b>(NYSE: GME)and movie theater chain<b>AMC Entertainment</b>(NYSE: AMC)fit the bill. GameStop was the most short-sold stock of any publicly traded company, with AMC also heavily short-sold and sporting a penny stock share price (which is itself a major lure for young retail investors).</p><p><blockquote>从 1 月中旬开始,Reddit 的 WallStreetBets 聊天室的散户投资者开始联合起来购买空头兴趣较高的公司的股票和价外看涨期权期权(即许多投资者押注股价下跌的股票)。电子游戏及配件零售商<b>游戏驿站</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:GME)和连锁电影院<b>AMC院线</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:AMC)符合要求。游戏驿站是所有上市公司中被卖空最多的股票,AMC 也被大量卖空,并且股价很低(这本身就是对年轻散户投资者的主要诱惑)。</blockquote></p><p> Without getting too far into the weeds, the goal of these retail investors was to effect ashort squeezeand put a hurting on the so-called big money. Institutional investors and hedge funds are the primary holders of short positions. By creating a short squeeze, retail investors sent pessimists fleeing for the exit, further vaulting companies like GameStop and AMC to the upside.</p><p><blockquote>在不深入研究杂草的情况下,这些散户投资者的目标是实现空头挤压,并损害所谓的大资金。机构投资者和对冲基金是空头头寸的主要持有者。通过制造空头挤压,散户投资者让悲观主义者逃离退出,进一步推动游戏驿站和 AMC 等公司上涨。</blockquote></p><p> But tenured investors are also keenly aware that a company's operating performancematters far more than any short-term euphoria. With short-squeezes highly unlikely to support GameStop's or AMC's market valuations over the long run, the question becomes this: When will these turnaround candidates be profitable?</p><p><blockquote>但终身投资者也敏锐地意识到,公司的经营业绩远比任何短期兴奋更重要。从长远来看,空头挤压不太可能支撑 GameStop 或 AMC 的市场估值,因此问题变成了:这些扭亏为盈的候选人何时才能盈利?</blockquote></p><p> Let's take a closer look.</p><p><blockquote>让我们仔细看看。</blockquote></p><p> GameStop's multiyear transformation is a work in progress</p><p><blockquote>GameStop 的多年转型正在进行中</blockquote></p><p> To get the obvious out of the way, GameStop endured a rough 2020 because of the pandemic. Some of its stores were closed, with others seeing dramatically reduced foot traffic. This did not help an already struggling company.</p><p><blockquote>为了避免显而易见的事情,游戏驿站因为疫情经历了艰难的2020年。它的一些商店关闭了,其他商店的客流量急剧下降。这对一家已经陷入困境的公司没有帮助。</blockquote></p><p> The problem for GameStop is thatit's a victim of its own success. Over two decades, it became one of the dominant retailers of new and used video games, consoles, and accessories. The used game market, which allowed the company to repurchase and resell physical games, was an especially lucrative venture for the company. With things going so well for so long, management continued down the same path.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站的问题在于它是自己成功的受害者。二十多年来,它成为新的和二手视频游戏、游戏机和配件的主要零售商之一。二手游戏市场允许公司回购和转售实体游戏,对公司来说是一项特别有利可图的业务。事情进展如此顺利,管理层继续沿着同样的道路前进。</blockquote></p><p> However, this success came to an abrupt halt a few years ago. With gamers steadily shifting to digital platforms, GameStop's brick-and-mortar empire quickly transformed from an asset to a liability. Despite its best efforts to promote digital gaming -- GameStop's e-commerce sales in 2020 grew by 191% -- total revenue last yeardeclined by 21%, with the company shuttering 12% of its stores.</p><p><blockquote>然而,这种成功在几年前戛然而止。随着游戏玩家稳步转向数字平台,GameStop的实体帝国迅速从资产转变为负债。尽管 GameStop 尽了最大努力推广数字游戏,其 2020 年电子商务销售额增长了 191%,但去年总收入下降了 21%,该公司关闭了 12% 的商店。</blockquote></p><p> In order for GameStop to get back into the profit column, it needs to continue to reinvest in digital growth initiatives, while at the same time curbing its spending by closing underperforming stores. Essentially, GameStop is going to back its way into the profit column. Full-year sales will remain relatively stagnant, but the higher margins associated with digital gaming, coupled with lower costs from a smaller store base, should eventually bring GameStop back to profitability.</p><p><blockquote>为了让游戏驿站重返利润行列,它需要继续对数字增长计划进行再投资,同时通过关闭表现不佳的商店来抑制支出。从本质上讲,游戏驿站将重返利润行列。全年销售额将保持相对停滞,但与数字游戏相关的更高利润率,加上较小商店基地的较低成本,最终应该会使游戏驿站恢复盈利。</blockquote></p><p> When might this happen? According to Wall Street's consensus estimates from<b>FactSet</b>, it'll be three more years before GameStop is back in the profit column. If there is a positive here, it's that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) is expected to be positive this year, but EBITDA isn't the same as profitability.</p><p><blockquote>这种情况什么时候会发生?根据华尔街的一致估计<b>事实集</b>游戏驿站还需要三年时间才能重返盈利行列。如果说这里有一个积极的方面,那就是今年的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)预计为正,但EBITDA并不等同于盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> Considering how far GameStop has run, waiting three more years for an estimated $1.25 per share in profitis a tall order.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到游戏驿站已经走了多远,再等三年才能获得估计每股 1.25 美元的利润是一个很高的要求。</blockquote></p><p> <b>AMC's future is murky, at best</b></p><p><blockquote><b>AMC 的未来充其量是黯淡的</b></blockquote></p><p> Compared to AMC Entertainment, GameStop had a cakewalk in 2020. The pandemic shuttered many of AMC's theaters, and most of those thathave reopenedhave capacity-limiting social distancing mandates in place.</p><p><blockquote>与AMC院线相比,游戏驿站在2020年过得很轻松。疫情关闭了AMC的许多影院,大多数重新开放的影院都有限制容量的社交距离规定。</blockquote></p><p> To get back to its glory days, AMC's game plan is to focus on harnessing film exclusivity in its theaters, reducing its debt load, and emphasizing high-margin alternative channels, such as its video on demand service. AMC also needs the pandemic to wrap up in 2021, at least in the United States. The quicker its theaters can return to full capacity, the faster the company can address its most-pressing concerns.</p><p><blockquote>为了重返辉煌岁月,AMC 的游戏计划是专注于利用影院的电影独家发行权,减少债务负担,并强调高利润的替代渠道,例如视频点播服务。AMC 还需要疫情在 2021 年结束,至少在美国是这样。影院越快恢复满负荷运转,公司就能越快解决最紧迫的问题。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But the issues with AMC look far less fixable than what GameStop is contending with.<b>AT&T</b>subsidiary WarnerMedia announced plans torelease all of its films on HBO Maxthe same day they'll hit theaters in 2021.<b>Walt Disney</b>will do the same on its Disney+ streaming platform for a small number of movies. Losing exclusivity on film releases, or having its exclusivity window cut in any meaningful way, would prove devastating to AMC's chances of a successful turnaround.</p><p><blockquote>但 AMC 的问题看起来远不如游戏驿站正在应对的问题那么容易解决。<b>AT&T</b>子公司华纳媒体宣布计划在 2021 年上映的同一天在 HBO Max 上发布其所有电影。<b>华特·迪士尼</b>将在其Disney+流媒体平台上为少量电影做同样的事情。失去电影发行的独家权,或者以任何有意义的方式削减其独家权窗口,都将对 AMC 成功扭亏为盈的机会造成毁灭性打击。</blockquote></p><p> Making matters worse, the company has been forced to leverage itself to the hilt in order to survive. It ended 2020 with $5.7 billion in corporate borrowings, and has been paying north of a 10% interest rate on most of its debt issuances over the past year. Considering how favorable lending rates are for most businesses, a double-digit interest rate shows how distressed AMC's operating model is viewed.</p><p><blockquote>更糟糕的是,为了生存,该公司被迫最大限度地利用自己。截至 2020 年底,该公司的企业借款为 57 亿美元,并且在过去一年中,其大部分债务发行的利率都超过了 10%。考虑到贷款利率对大多数企业来说是多么有利,两位数的利率表明 AMC 的运营模式被视为多么糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> As for when AMC will be profitable, it remains a mystery. Despite an expected doubling of sales in 2021 and 2022, Wall Street's consensus is for AMC to lose $3.25 per share in 2021, lose another $0.97 per share in 2022, and shrink to a per-share loss of $0.60 in 2023. This implies it'll be at least another four years before the company has a shot at becoming profitable.</p><p><blockquote>至于AMC何时才能盈利,仍然是个谜。尽管预计 2021 年和 2022 年销售额将翻一番,但华尔街的共识是 AMC 2021 年每股亏损 3.25 美元,2022 年每股再亏损 0.97 美元,2023 年每股亏损缩小至 0.60 美元。这意味着该公司至少还需要四年时间才能实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> My suspicion is AMC's debtis too much of a crippling factor for this company to succeed. Simply servicing its debt is going to eat up a lot of operating cash flow. Plus, without an influx of new capital via dilutive share offerings or debt issuances, AMClikely doesn't have enough cash to cover its lossesover the next two years.</p><p><blockquote>我怀疑 AMC 的债务对这家公司的成功来说是一个太大的削弱因素。仅仅偿还债务就会消耗大量运营现金流。此外,如果没有通过稀释性股票发行或债务发行吸引新资本,AMCLY 可能没有足够的现金来弥补未来两年的损失。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/when-will-amc-entertainment-and-gamestop-be-profitable-2021-03-29\">nasdaq</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c93da0dbf32abd71a566d9c13e226f5d","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/when-will-amc-entertainment-and-gamestop-be-profitable-2021-03-29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175442122","content_text":"Investing in the stock market can be quite the adventure. Last year, the volatility brought about by the coronavirus pandemic led to the quickest decline of more than 30% in theS&P 500's storied history, as well as the fastest rebound back to all-time highs.\nIn 2021, an unexpected catalyst has taken over as a key market driver:retail investors.\nThe important question retail investors should be asking about AMC and GameStop\nBeginning in mid-January, retail investors from Reddit's WallStreetBets chat room began banding together to buy shares and out-of-the-money call options in companies with high levels of short interest (i.e., stocks where a lot of investors are betting on a share price decline). Both video game and accessories retailerGameStop(NYSE: GME)and movie theater chainAMC Entertainment(NYSE: AMC)fit the bill. GameStop was the most short-sold stock of any publicly traded company, with AMC also heavily short-sold and sporting a penny stock share price (which is itself a major lure for young retail investors).\nWithout getting too far into the weeds, the goal of these retail investors was to effect ashort squeezeand put a hurting on the so-called big money. Institutional investors and hedge funds are the primary holders of short positions. By creating a short squeeze, retail investors sent pessimists fleeing for the exit, further vaulting companies like GameStop and AMC to the upside.\nBut tenured investors are also keenly aware that a company's operating performancematters far more than any short-term euphoria. With short-squeezes highly unlikely to support GameStop's or AMC's market valuations over the long run, the question becomes this: When will these turnaround candidates be profitable?\nLet's take a closer look.\nGameStop's multiyear transformation is a work in progress\nTo get the obvious out of the way, GameStop endured a rough 2020 because of the pandemic. Some of its stores were closed, with others seeing dramatically reduced foot traffic. This did not help an already struggling company.\nThe problem for GameStop is thatit's a victim of its own success. Over two decades, it became one of the dominant retailers of new and used video games, consoles, and accessories. The used game market, which allowed the company to repurchase and resell physical games, was an especially lucrative venture for the company. With things going so well for so long, management continued down the same path.\nHowever, this success came to an abrupt halt a few years ago. With gamers steadily shifting to digital platforms, GameStop's brick-and-mortar empire quickly transformed from an asset to a liability. Despite its best efforts to promote digital gaming -- GameStop's e-commerce sales in 2020 grew by 191% -- total revenue last yeardeclined by 21%, with the company shuttering 12% of its stores.\nIn order for GameStop to get back into the profit column, it needs to continue to reinvest in digital growth initiatives, while at the same time curbing its spending by closing underperforming stores. Essentially, GameStop is going to back its way into the profit column. Full-year sales will remain relatively stagnant, but the higher margins associated with digital gaming, coupled with lower costs from a smaller store base, should eventually bring GameStop back to profitability.\nWhen might this happen? According to Wall Street's consensus estimates fromFactSet, it'll be three more years before GameStop is back in the profit column. If there is a positive here, it's that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) is expected to be positive this year, but EBITDA isn't the same as profitability.\nConsidering how far GameStop has run, waiting three more years for an estimated $1.25 per share in profitis a tall order.\nAMC's future is murky, at best\nCompared to AMC Entertainment, GameStop had a cakewalk in 2020. The pandemic shuttered many of AMC's theaters, and most of those thathave reopenedhave capacity-limiting social distancing mandates in place.\nTo get back to its glory days, AMC's game plan is to focus on harnessing film exclusivity in its theaters, reducing its debt load, and emphasizing high-margin alternative channels, such as its video on demand service. AMC also needs the pandemic to wrap up in 2021, at least in the United States. The quicker its theaters can return to full capacity, the faster the company can address its most-pressing concerns.\nBut the issues with AMC look far less fixable than what GameStop is contending with.AT&Tsubsidiary WarnerMedia announced plans torelease all of its films on HBO Maxthe same day they'll hit theaters in 2021.Walt Disneywill do the same on its Disney+ streaming platform for a small number of movies. Losing exclusivity on film releases, or having its exclusivity window cut in any meaningful way, would prove devastating to AMC's chances of a successful turnaround.\nMaking matters worse, the company has been forced to leverage itself to the hilt in order to survive. It ended 2020 with $5.7 billion in corporate borrowings, and has been paying north of a 10% interest rate on most of its debt issuances over the past year. Considering how favorable lending rates are for most businesses, a double-digit interest rate shows how distressed AMC's operating model is viewed.\nAs for when AMC will be profitable, it remains a mystery. Despite an expected doubling of sales in 2021 and 2022, Wall Street's consensus is for AMC to lose $3.25 per share in 2021, lose another $0.97 per share in 2022, and shrink to a per-share loss of $0.60 in 2023. This implies it'll be at least another four years before the company has a shot at becoming profitable.\nMy suspicion is AMC's debtis too much of a crippling factor for this company to succeed. Simply servicing its debt is going to eat up a lot of operating cash flow. Plus, without an influx of new capital via dilutive share offerings or debt issuances, AMClikely doesn't have enough cash to cover its lossesover the next two years.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9,"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":768,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353346750,"gmtCreate":1616464824170,"gmtModify":1634525684888,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Oh come on","listText":"Oh come on","text":"Oh come on","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/353346750","repostId":"1197371935","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":787,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328577723,"gmtCreate":1615545466562,"gmtModify":1703490726670,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328577723","repostId":"2118952586","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":664,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328577241,"gmtCreate":1615545430683,"gmtModify":1703490725980,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"come on! ","listText":"come on! ","text":"come on!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328577241","repostId":"1174585000","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":811,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":365191319,"gmtCreate":1614700112331,"gmtModify":1703480132218,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"let’s go","listText":"let’s go","text":"let’s go","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/365191319","repostId":"2116599540","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":911,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":366107818,"gmtCreate":1614403776434,"gmtModify":1703477348381,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"🙌🏽","listText":"🙌🏽","text":"🙌🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/366107818","repostId":"2114070543","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1148,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":159236388,"gmtCreate":1624969117744,"gmtModify":1633946428978,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"let’s go! 🙌🏽","listText":"let’s go! 🙌🏽","text":"let’s go! 🙌🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/159236388","repostId":"1128482198","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":599,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893640965,"gmtCreate":1628261006157,"gmtModify":1633752138942,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"hmmm","listText":"hmmm","text":"hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893640965","repostId":"1110501028","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110501028","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628260468,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1110501028?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 22:34","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate<blockquote>腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110501028","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.","content":"<p>(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.</p><p><blockquote>(8月6日)腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate<blockquote>腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate<blockquote>腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-06 22:34</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.</p><p><blockquote>(8月6日)腾讯控股被海淀区检察院起诉。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"00700":"腾讯控股","TCEHY":"腾讯控股ADR"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110501028","content_text":"(Aug 6) Tencent sued by the Haidian District Procuratorate.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"00700":0.9,"TCEHY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899142176,"gmtCreate":1628171221795,"gmtModify":1633752968158,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"here we go","listText":"here we go","text":"here we go","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899142176","repostId":"1158295123","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2023,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890060005,"gmtCreate":1628067485407,"gmtModify":1633753902778,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yesss","listText":"yesss","text":"yesss","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890060005","repostId":"1115773909","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115773909","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628066666,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1115773909?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 16:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115773909","media":"The Street\t","summary":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Fran","content":"<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street\t</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 16:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda\">The Street\t</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LYFT":"Lyft, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115773909","content_text":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.\nThe quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.\nRevenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.\nA survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.\nFactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.\nThe company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.\nAt last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.\nAdjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.\n\"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.\nAt June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.\nThe company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.\n\"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.\nAt the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LYFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2513,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153869791,"gmtCreate":1625017501113,"gmtModify":1633945804180,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"☺️","listText":"☺️","text":"☺️","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153869791","repostId":"1122418477","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2418,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190079365,"gmtCreate":1620560872857,"gmtModify":1634198029343,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"💪🏽","listText":"💪🏽","text":"💪🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/190079365","repostId":"1193602237","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193602237","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620471120,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1193602237?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-08 18:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. hiring takes big step back as businesses scramble for workers, raw materials<blockquote>随着企业争夺工人和原材料,美国招聘大幅倒退</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193602237","media":"reuters","summary":"U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in dema","content":"<p>U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in demand, unleashed by the reopening of the economy amid rapidly improving public health and massive financial help from the government.</p><p><blockquote>美国雇主可能在 4 月份雇佣了近 100 万名工人,因为他们急于满足需求激增,这是在公共卫生迅速改善和政府提供大量财政援助的情况下经济重新开放所释放的。</blockquote></p><p>The Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Friday will be the first to show the impact of the White House's $1.9 trillion COVID-19 pandemic rescue package, which was approved in March. It is likely to show the economy entered the second quarter with even greater momentum, firmly putting it on track this year for its best performance in almost four decades.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周五发布的备受关注的就业报告将首次显示白宫 3 月份批准的 1.9 万亿美元 COVID-19 大流行救助计划的影响。这可能表明经济以更大的势头进入第二季度,坚定地走上了今年近四十年来最好表现的轨道。</blockquote></p><p>\"We are looking for a pretty good figure, reflecting the ongoing reopening we have seen,\" said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING in New York. \"With cash in people's pockets, economic activity is looking good and that should lead to more and more hiring right across the economy.\"</p><p><blockquote>荷兰国际集团驻纽约首席国际经济学家詹姆斯·奈特利表示:“我们正在寻找一个相当不错的数字,反映我们所看到的正在进行的重新开放。”“随着人们口袋里有了现金,经济活动看起来不错,这应该会导致整个经济中越来越多的招聘。”</blockquote></p><p>According to a Reuters survey of economists, nonfarm payrolls likely increased by 978,000 jobs last month after rising by 916,000 in March. That would leave employment about 7.5 million jobs below its peak in February 2020.</p><p><blockquote>根据路透社对经济学家的调查,继3月份增加91.6万个之后,上个月非农就业人数可能增加97.8万个。这将使就业人数比 2020 年 2 月的峰值低约 750 万个。</blockquote></p><p>Twelve months ago, the economy purged a record 20.679 million jobs as it reeled from mandatory closures of nonessential businesses to slow the first wave of COVID-19 infections.</p><p><blockquote>12 个月前,经济因强制关闭非必要企业以减缓第一波 COVID-19 感染而减少了创纪录的 2067.9 万个工作岗位。</blockquote></p><p>April's payrolls estimates range from as low as 656,000 to as high as 2.1 million jobs. New claims for unemployment benefits have dropped below 500,000 for the first-time since the pandemic started and job cuts announced by U.S.-based employers in April were the lowest in nearly 21 years.</p><p><blockquote>4月份的就业人数估计从低至65.6万人到高达210万人不等。自疫情爆发以来,新申请失业救济人数首次降至 50 万人以下,美国雇主 4 月份宣布的裁员人数为近 21 年来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Also arguing for another month of blockbuster job growth, consumers' perceptions of the labor market are the strongest in 13 months. But the pent-up demand, which contributed to the economy's 6.4% annualized growth pace in the first quarter, the second-fastest since the third quarter of 2003, has triggered shortages of labor and raw materials.</p><p><blockquote>消费者对劳动力市场的看法也是 13 个月来最强劲的,这也表明就业又出现了大幅增长。但被压抑的需求导致了劳动力和原材料短缺,第一季度经济年化增长率为 6.4%,这是自 2003 年第三季度以来的第二快增长率。</blockquote></p><p>From manufacturing to restaurants, employers are scrambling for workers. A range of factors, including parents still at home caring for children, coronavirus-related retirements and generous unemployment checks, are blamed for the labor shortages.</p><p><blockquote>从制造业到餐馆,雇主们都在争抢工人。劳动力短缺被归咎于一系列因素,包括仍在家照顾孩子的父母、与冠状病毒相关的退休和慷慨的失业支票。</blockquote></p><p>\"While we do not expect that lack of workers will weigh noticeably on April employment, rehiring could become more difficult in coming months before expanded unemployment benefits expire in September,\" said Veronica Clark, an economist at Citigroup in New York.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团驻纽约经济学家维罗妮卡·克拉克表示:“虽然我们预计工人短缺不会对 4 月份的就业造成明显影响,但在扩大的失业救济金于 9 月份到期之前,未来几个月重新招聘可能会变得更加困难。”</blockquote></p><p>Payroll gains were likely led by the leisure and hospitality industry as more high-contact businesses such as restaurants, bars and amusement parks reopen. Americans over the age of 16 are now eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, leading states like New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to lift most of their coronavirus capacity restrictions on businesses.</p><p><blockquote>随着餐馆、酒吧和游乐园等更多高接触的企业重新开业,休闲和酒店业可能会推动工资增长。16岁以上的美国人现在有资格接种新冠肺炎疫苗,导致纽约州、新泽西州和康涅狄格州等州取消了对企业的大部分冠状病毒产能限制。</blockquote></p><p>BROAD EMPLOYMENT GAINS</p><p><blockquote>广泛的就业增长</blockquote></p><p>Solid gains were also expected in manufacturing, despite a global semiconductor chip shortage, which has forced motor vehicle manufacturers to cut production. Strong housing demand likely boosted construction payrolls.</p><p><blockquote>尽管全球半导体芯片短缺迫使汽车制造商减产,但预计制造业也将稳步增长。强劲的住房需求可能会推高建筑业就业人数。</blockquote></p><p>Government employment is also expected to have picked up as school districts hired more teachers following the resumption of in-person learning in many states.</p><p><blockquote>随着许多州恢复面对面学习,学区雇佣了更多教师,政府就业预计也会增加。</blockquote></p><p>Robust hiring is unlikely to have an impact on President Joe Biden's plan to spend another $4 trillion on education and childcare, middle- and low-income families, infrastructure and jobs. Neither was it expected to influence monetary policy, with the Federal Reserve having signaled it is prepared to let the economy run hotter than it did in previous cycles.</p><p><blockquote>强劲的招聘不太可能对乔·拜登总统在教育和儿童保育、中低收入家庭、基础设施和就业方面再支出 4 万亿美元的计划产生影响。预计它也不会影响货币政策,美联储已表示准备让经济运行比前几个周期更热。</blockquote></p><p>Millions of Americans remain out of work and many have permanently lost jobs because of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>数百万美国人仍然失业,许多人因为疫情而永久失业。</blockquote></p><p>\"Nobody knows what the economy is going to look like post COVID,\" said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard in New York. \"There is a stubbornly high number of people who have been permanently displaced. The (spending) plans are about giving the economy a higher trajectory of growth so that these people can be hired sooner rather than later.\"</p><p><blockquote>纽约 TS Lombard 首席美国经济学家史蒂文·布利茨 (Steven Blitz) 表示:“没有人知道新冠疫情过后的经济会是什么样子。”“永久流离失所的人数一直居高不下。(支出)计划的目的是让经济走上更高的增长轨迹,以便这些人能够尽早就业。”</blockquote></p><p>The unemployment rate is forecast dropping to 5.8% in April from 6.0% in March. The unemployment rate has been understated by people misclassifying themselves as being \"employed but absent from work.\"</p><p><blockquote>失业率预计将从3月份的6.0%降至4月份的5.8%。人们错误地将自己归类为“有工作但不工作”,从而低估了失业率。</blockquote></p><p>To gauge the recovery, economists will focus on the number of people who have been unemployed for more than six months as well as those out of work because of permanent job losses.</p><p><blockquote>为了衡量经济复苏,经济学家将关注失业超过六个月的人数以及因永久性失业而失业的人数。</blockquote></p><p>The labor force participation rate, or the proportion of working-age Americans who have a job or are looking for one, likely improved last month, though it remained below its pre-pandemic level. More than 4 million people, many of them women, dropped out of the labor force during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>劳动力参与率,即拥有工作或正在寻找工作的工作年龄美国人的比例,上个月可能有所改善,尽管仍低于大流行前的水平。在疫情期间,超过400万人,其中许多是妇女,退出了劳动力市场。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>With the lower-wage leisure and hospitality industry expected to dominate employment gains, average hourly earnings were likely unchanged in April after dipping 0.1% in March. That would lead to a 0.4% drop in wages on a year-on-year basis after a 4.2% increase in March.</p><p><blockquote>由于工资较低的休闲和酒店业预计将主导就业增长,平均时薪在3月份下降0.1%后,4月份可能保持不变。这将导致工资在3月份增长4.2%后同比下降0.4%。</blockquote></p><p>\"We will be watching average hourly earnings very closely for signs that difficulty in hiring qualified workers is beginning to boost compensation,\" said David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management in New York.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通资产管理公司(J.P. Morgan Asset Management)驻纽约首席全球策略师大卫·凯利(David Kelly)表示:“我们将密切关注平均时薪,寻找招聘合格工人的困难开始推高薪酬的迹象。”</blockquote></p><p>\"If tightening labor markets boost wage growth, then the inflation bounce which the Fed is anticipating to be modest and transitory could turn out to be stronger and longer-lasting, leading to earlier Fed tightening.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果劳动力市场收紧推动工资增长,那么美联储预计温和且短暂的通胀反弹可能会变得更强劲、更持久,从而导致美联储提前收紧货币政策。”</blockquote></p><p>The anticipated drop in wages will have no impact on consumer spending, with Americans sitting on more than $2 trillion in excess savings. The average workweek was forecast steady at 34.9 hours.</p><p><blockquote>预计工资下降不会对消费者支出产生影响,美国人有超过2万亿美元的超额储蓄。平均工作周预计稳定在34.9小时。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. hiring takes big step back as businesses scramble for workers, raw materials<blockquote>随着企业争夺工人和原材料,美国招聘大幅倒退</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. hiring takes big step back as businesses scramble for workers, raw materials<blockquote>随着企业争夺工人和原材料,美国招聘大幅倒退</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-08 18:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in demand, unleashed by the reopening of the economy amid rapidly improving public health and massive financial help from the government.</p><p><blockquote>美国雇主可能在 4 月份雇佣了近 100 万名工人,因为他们急于满足需求激增,这是在公共卫生迅速改善和政府提供大量财政援助的情况下经济重新开放所释放的。</blockquote></p><p>The Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Friday will be the first to show the impact of the White House's $1.9 trillion COVID-19 pandemic rescue package, which was approved in March. It is likely to show the economy entered the second quarter with even greater momentum, firmly putting it on track this year for its best performance in almost four decades.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周五发布的备受关注的就业报告将首次显示白宫 3 月份批准的 1.9 万亿美元 COVID-19 大流行救助计划的影响。这可能表明经济以更大的势头进入第二季度,坚定地走上了今年近四十年来最好表现的轨道。</blockquote></p><p>\"We are looking for a pretty good figure, reflecting the ongoing reopening we have seen,\" said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING in New York. \"With cash in people's pockets, economic activity is looking good and that should lead to more and more hiring right across the economy.\"</p><p><blockquote>荷兰国际集团驻纽约首席国际经济学家詹姆斯·奈特利表示:“我们正在寻找一个相当不错的数字,反映我们所看到的正在进行的重新开放。”“随着人们口袋里有了现金,经济活动看起来不错,这应该会导致整个经济中越来越多的招聘。”</blockquote></p><p>According to a Reuters survey of economists, nonfarm payrolls likely increased by 978,000 jobs last month after rising by 916,000 in March. That would leave employment about 7.5 million jobs below its peak in February 2020.</p><p><blockquote>根据路透社对经济学家的调查,继3月份增加91.6万个之后,上个月非农就业人数可能增加97.8万个。这将使就业人数比 2020 年 2 月的峰值低约 750 万个。</blockquote></p><p>Twelve months ago, the economy purged a record 20.679 million jobs as it reeled from mandatory closures of nonessential businesses to slow the first wave of COVID-19 infections.</p><p><blockquote>12 个月前,经济因强制关闭非必要企业以减缓第一波 COVID-19 感染而减少了创纪录的 2067.9 万个工作岗位。</blockquote></p><p>April's payrolls estimates range from as low as 656,000 to as high as 2.1 million jobs. New claims for unemployment benefits have dropped below 500,000 for the first-time since the pandemic started and job cuts announced by U.S.-based employers in April were the lowest in nearly 21 years.</p><p><blockquote>4月份的就业人数估计从低至65.6万人到高达210万人不等。自疫情爆发以来,新申请失业救济人数首次降至 50 万人以下,美国雇主 4 月份宣布的裁员人数为近 21 年来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Also arguing for another month of blockbuster job growth, consumers' perceptions of the labor market are the strongest in 13 months. But the pent-up demand, which contributed to the economy's 6.4% annualized growth pace in the first quarter, the second-fastest since the third quarter of 2003, has triggered shortages of labor and raw materials.</p><p><blockquote>消费者对劳动力市场的看法也是 13 个月来最强劲的,这也表明就业又出现了大幅增长。但被压抑的需求导致了劳动力和原材料短缺,第一季度经济年化增长率为 6.4%,这是自 2003 年第三季度以来的第二快增长率。</blockquote></p><p>From manufacturing to restaurants, employers are scrambling for workers. A range of factors, including parents still at home caring for children, coronavirus-related retirements and generous unemployment checks, are blamed for the labor shortages.</p><p><blockquote>从制造业到餐馆,雇主们都在争抢工人。劳动力短缺被归咎于一系列因素,包括仍在家照顾孩子的父母、与冠状病毒相关的退休和慷慨的失业支票。</blockquote></p><p>\"While we do not expect that lack of workers will weigh noticeably on April employment, rehiring could become more difficult in coming months before expanded unemployment benefits expire in September,\" said Veronica Clark, an economist at Citigroup in New York.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团驻纽约经济学家维罗妮卡·克拉克表示:“虽然我们预计工人短缺不会对 4 月份的就业造成明显影响,但在扩大的失业救济金于 9 月份到期之前,未来几个月重新招聘可能会变得更加困难。”</blockquote></p><p>Payroll gains were likely led by the leisure and hospitality industry as more high-contact businesses such as restaurants, bars and amusement parks reopen. Americans over the age of 16 are now eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, leading states like New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to lift most of their coronavirus capacity restrictions on businesses.</p><p><blockquote>随着餐馆、酒吧和游乐园等更多高接触的企业重新开业,休闲和酒店业可能会推动工资增长。16岁以上的美国人现在有资格接种新冠肺炎疫苗,导致纽约州、新泽西州和康涅狄格州等州取消了对企业的大部分冠状病毒产能限制。</blockquote></p><p>BROAD EMPLOYMENT GAINS</p><p><blockquote>广泛的就业增长</blockquote></p><p>Solid gains were also expected in manufacturing, despite a global semiconductor chip shortage, which has forced motor vehicle manufacturers to cut production. Strong housing demand likely boosted construction payrolls.</p><p><blockquote>尽管全球半导体芯片短缺迫使汽车制造商减产,但预计制造业也将稳步增长。强劲的住房需求可能会推高建筑业就业人数。</blockquote></p><p>Government employment is also expected to have picked up as school districts hired more teachers following the resumption of in-person learning in many states.</p><p><blockquote>随着许多州恢复面对面学习,学区雇佣了更多教师,政府就业预计也会增加。</blockquote></p><p>Robust hiring is unlikely to have an impact on President Joe Biden's plan to spend another $4 trillion on education and childcare, middle- and low-income families, infrastructure and jobs. Neither was it expected to influence monetary policy, with the Federal Reserve having signaled it is prepared to let the economy run hotter than it did in previous cycles.</p><p><blockquote>强劲的招聘不太可能对乔·拜登总统在教育和儿童保育、中低收入家庭、基础设施和就业方面再支出 4 万亿美元的计划产生影响。预计它也不会影响货币政策,美联储已表示准备让经济运行比前几个周期更热。</blockquote></p><p>Millions of Americans remain out of work and many have permanently lost jobs because of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>数百万美国人仍然失业,许多人因为疫情而永久失业。</blockquote></p><p>\"Nobody knows what the economy is going to look like post COVID,\" said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard in New York. \"There is a stubbornly high number of people who have been permanently displaced. The (spending) plans are about giving the economy a higher trajectory of growth so that these people can be hired sooner rather than later.\"</p><p><blockquote>纽约 TS Lombard 首席美国经济学家史蒂文·布利茨 (Steven Blitz) 表示:“没有人知道新冠疫情过后的经济会是什么样子。”“永久流离失所的人数一直居高不下。(支出)计划的目的是让经济走上更高的增长轨迹,以便这些人能够尽早就业。”</blockquote></p><p>The unemployment rate is forecast dropping to 5.8% in April from 6.0% in March. The unemployment rate has been understated by people misclassifying themselves as being \"employed but absent from work.\"</p><p><blockquote>失业率预计将从3月份的6.0%降至4月份的5.8%。人们错误地将自己归类为“有工作但不工作”,从而低估了失业率。</blockquote></p><p>To gauge the recovery, economists will focus on the number of people who have been unemployed for more than six months as well as those out of work because of permanent job losses.</p><p><blockquote>为了衡量经济复苏,经济学家将关注失业超过六个月的人数以及因永久性失业而失业的人数。</blockquote></p><p>The labor force participation rate, or the proportion of working-age Americans who have a job or are looking for one, likely improved last month, though it remained below its pre-pandemic level. More than 4 million people, many of them women, dropped out of the labor force during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>劳动力参与率,即拥有工作或正在寻找工作的工作年龄美国人的比例,上个月可能有所改善,尽管仍低于大流行前的水平。在疫情期间,超过400万人,其中许多是妇女,退出了劳动力市场。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>With the lower-wage leisure and hospitality industry expected to dominate employment gains, average hourly earnings were likely unchanged in April after dipping 0.1% in March. That would lead to a 0.4% drop in wages on a year-on-year basis after a 4.2% increase in March.</p><p><blockquote>由于工资较低的休闲和酒店业预计将主导就业增长,平均时薪在3月份下降0.1%后,4月份可能保持不变。这将导致工资在3月份增长4.2%后同比下降0.4%。</blockquote></p><p>\"We will be watching average hourly earnings very closely for signs that difficulty in hiring qualified workers is beginning to boost compensation,\" said David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management in New York.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通资产管理公司(J.P. Morgan Asset Management)驻纽约首席全球策略师大卫·凯利(David Kelly)表示:“我们将密切关注平均时薪,寻找招聘合格工人的困难开始推高薪酬的迹象。”</blockquote></p><p>\"If tightening labor markets boost wage growth, then the inflation bounce which the Fed is anticipating to be modest and transitory could turn out to be stronger and longer-lasting, leading to earlier Fed tightening.\"</p><p><blockquote>“如果劳动力市场收紧推动工资增长,那么美联储预计温和且短暂的通胀反弹可能会变得更强劲、更持久,从而导致美联储提前收紧货币政策。”</blockquote></p><p>The anticipated drop in wages will have no impact on consumer spending, with Americans sitting on more than $2 trillion in excess savings. The average workweek was forecast steady at 34.9 hours.</p><p><blockquote>预计工资下降不会对消费者支出产生影响,美国人有超过2万亿美元的超额储蓄。平均工作周预计稳定在34.9小时。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/markets\">reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/markets","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193602237","content_text":"U.S. employers likely hired nearly a million workers in April as they rushed to meet a surge in demand, unleashed by the reopening of the economy amid rapidly improving public health and massive financial help from the government.The Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Friday will be the first to show the impact of the White House's $1.9 trillion COVID-19 pandemic rescue package, which was approved in March. It is likely to show the economy entered the second quarter with even greater momentum, firmly putting it on track this year for its best performance in almost four decades.\"We are looking for a pretty good figure, reflecting the ongoing reopening we have seen,\" said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING in New York. \"With cash in people's pockets, economic activity is looking good and that should lead to more and more hiring right across the economy.\"According to a Reuters survey of economists, nonfarm payrolls likely increased by 978,000 jobs last month after rising by 916,000 in March. That would leave employment about 7.5 million jobs below its peak in February 2020.Twelve months ago, the economy purged a record 20.679 million jobs as it reeled from mandatory closures of nonessential businesses to slow the first wave of COVID-19 infections.April's payrolls estimates range from as low as 656,000 to as high as 2.1 million jobs. New claims for unemployment benefits have dropped below 500,000 for the first-time since the pandemic started and job cuts announced by U.S.-based employers in April were the lowest in nearly 21 years.Also arguing for another month of blockbuster job growth, consumers' perceptions of the labor market are the strongest in 13 months. But the pent-up demand, which contributed to the economy's 6.4% annualized growth pace in the first quarter, the second-fastest since the third quarter of 2003, has triggered shortages of labor and raw materials.From manufacturing to restaurants, employers are scrambling for workers. A range of factors, including parents still at home caring for children, coronavirus-related retirements and generous unemployment checks, are blamed for the labor shortages.\"While we do not expect that lack of workers will weigh noticeably on April employment, rehiring could become more difficult in coming months before expanded unemployment benefits expire in September,\" said Veronica Clark, an economist at Citigroup in New York.Payroll gains were likely led by the leisure and hospitality industry as more high-contact businesses such as restaurants, bars and amusement parks reopen. Americans over the age of 16 are now eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, leading states like New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to lift most of their coronavirus capacity restrictions on businesses.BROAD EMPLOYMENT GAINSSolid gains were also expected in manufacturing, despite a global semiconductor chip shortage, which has forced motor vehicle manufacturers to cut production. Strong housing demand likely boosted construction payrolls.Government employment is also expected to have picked up as school districts hired more teachers following the resumption of in-person learning in many states.Robust hiring is unlikely to have an impact on President Joe Biden's plan to spend another $4 trillion on education and childcare, middle- and low-income families, infrastructure and jobs. Neither was it expected to influence monetary policy, with the Federal Reserve having signaled it is prepared to let the economy run hotter than it did in previous cycles.Millions of Americans remain out of work and many have permanently lost jobs because of the pandemic.\"Nobody knows what the economy is going to look like post COVID,\" said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard in New York. \"There is a stubbornly high number of people who have been permanently displaced. The (spending) plans are about giving the economy a higher trajectory of growth so that these people can be hired sooner rather than later.\"The unemployment rate is forecast dropping to 5.8% in April from 6.0% in March. The unemployment rate has been understated by people misclassifying themselves as being \"employed but absent from work.\"To gauge the recovery, economists will focus on the number of people who have been unemployed for more than six months as well as those out of work because of permanent job losses.The labor force participation rate, or the proportion of working-age Americans who have a job or are looking for one, likely improved last month, though it remained below its pre-pandemic level. More than 4 million people, many of them women, dropped out of the labor force during the pandemic.With the lower-wage leisure and hospitality industry expected to dominate employment gains, average hourly earnings were likely unchanged in April after dipping 0.1% in March. That would lead to a 0.4% drop in wages on a year-on-year basis after a 4.2% increase in March.\"We will be watching average hourly earnings very closely for signs that difficulty in hiring qualified workers is beginning to boost compensation,\" said David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management in New York.\"If tightening labor markets boost wage growth, then the inflation bounce which the Fed is anticipating to be modest and transitory could turn out to be stronger and longer-lasting, leading to earlier Fed tightening.\"The anticipated drop in wages will have no impact on consumer spending, with Americans sitting on more than $2 trillion in excess savings. The average workweek was forecast steady at 34.9 hours.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":696,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890069188,"gmtCreate":1628067634344,"gmtModify":1633753902170,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"great","listText":"great","text":"great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890069188","repostId":"1115773909","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115773909","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628066666,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1115773909?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 16:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115773909","media":"The Street\t","summary":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Fran","content":"<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLyft Stock: Ride-Hailing Company Narrows Loss on 'Record Hourly Earnings'<blockquote>Lyft股票:网约车公司因“创纪录的小时收益”而缩小亏损</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street\t</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 16:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period. <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft, Inc.</a>,</b> the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于旧金山的Lyft表示,最近一段时间收入增加了一倍多。<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYFT\">Lyft公司。</a>,</b>这家旧金山网约车专家公布第二季度亏损收窄,收入翻了一番多。</blockquote></p><p> The quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.</p><p><blockquote>季度净亏损从去年同期的每股 1.41 美元收窄至每股 76 美分。流通股上涨 7.4%,至 3.321 亿股。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>收入从 3.393 亿美元达到 7.65 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> A survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 对分析师进行的一项调查一致估计,GAAP 每股亏损 70 美分,收入为 7 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> FactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 报告称,Lyft 本季度调整后每股亏损 6 美分,而分析师普遍预期亏损 23 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,本季度首次实现基于息税折旧摊销前利润的调整后盈利能力。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.</p><p><blockquote>最后一次检查时,Lyft股价上涨 0.9%,至 55.86 美元。周二收盘下跌 1.1%,至 55.38 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度调整后 Ebitda 为 2380 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>联合创始人兼首席执行官洛根·格林 (Logan Green) 在一份声明中表示:“我们在每个指标上都超出了预期。”</blockquote></p><p> At June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>截至 6 月 30 日,Lyft报告有 1710 万活跃骑手,几乎是去年同期 870 万的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> The company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席财务官 Brian Roberts 表示,Lyft司机获得了“创纪录的小时收入”。公司声明没有具体说明数字。</blockquote></p><p> \"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.</p><p><blockquote>罗伯茨说:“尽管报告的新冠病例数有所增加,但由于对我们平台的需求持续增长,7 月份司机收入仍然强劲。”</blockquote></p><p> At the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>截至本季度末,Lyft拥有不受限制的现金、等价物和短期投资总计 22 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda\">The Street\t</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LYFT":"Lyft, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/lyft-narrows-loss-posts-profit-based-on-adjusted-ebitda","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115773909","content_text":"San Francisco based Lyft says revenue more than doubled in latest period.\n\nLyft, Inc., the San Francisco ride-hailing specialist, reported a narrower second-quarter loss as revenue more than doubled.\nThe quarterly net loss narrowed to 76 cents a share from $1.41 a share in the year-earlier quarter. Shares outstanding climbed 7.4% to 332.1 million.\nRevenue reached $765 million from $339.3 million.\nA survey of analysts by FactSet produced consensus estimates of a GAAP loss of 70 cents a share on revenue of $700 million.\nFactSet reported Lyft's adjusted loss for the quarter was 6 cents a share, compared with the consensus analyst estimate of a 23-cent loss.\nThe company said that in the quarter it for the first time reached adjusted profitability based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.\nAt last check Lyft shares were trading up 0.9% at $55.86. They closed regular Tuesday trading down 1.1% at $55.38.\nAdjusted Ebitda for the second quarter was $23.8 million.\n\"We beat our outlook across every metric,\" Logan Green, co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.\nAt June 30 Lyft reported 17.1 million active riders, nearly double the 8.7 million a year earlier.\nThe company's chief financial officer, Brian Roberts, said that Lyft drivers took in \"record hourly earnings.\" The company statement didn't specify numbers.\n\"And in July driver earnings remained strong as demand for our platform continued to grow despite increases in reported COVID case counts,\" Roberts said.\nAt the end of the quarter Lyft had unrestricted cash, equivalents and short-term investments totaling $2.2 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LYFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2626,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890087583,"gmtCreate":1628067447642,"gmtModify":1633753902899,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"could it?","listText":"could it?","text":"could it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890087583","repostId":"1115159207","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153866645,"gmtCreate":1625017657187,"gmtModify":1633945801056,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"up up ","listText":"up up ","text":"up up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153866645","repostId":"1187567340","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187567340","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625017360,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1187567340?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-30 09:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Housing Prices Are Going Up. Must They Crash?<blockquote>房价在上涨。他们一定要坠毁吗?</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187567340","media":"Barrons","summary":"There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices hav","content":"<p>There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices have appreciated by well more than 10% over the past year. This naturally leads to a concern about market volatility: Must what goes up comedown? Are werepeatingthe excesses of the early 2000s, when housing prices surged before the market crashed?</p><p><blockquote>有许多报道称购房者陷入竞购战,许多城市的房价在过去一年中上涨了 10% 以上。这自然会引发对市场波动的担忧:上涨的东西一定会下跌吗?我们是否正在重蹈21世纪初房价在市场崩溃前飙升的过度行为?</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts argue that this time, it’s even less likely that prices will fall.Inventoriesof new homes for sale are very low, and lending standards are much tighter than in 2005. This is true. In fact, the ground is even firmer than it seems.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师认为,这一次,房价下跌的可能性更小。待售新房库存非常低,贷款标准也比2005年严格得多。这是真的。事实上,地面比看起来还要坚实。</blockquote></p><p> New home inventories were very high before the Great Recession. Today, they are closer to the level that has been common for decades. The portion of inventory built and ready for move-in is especially low because of supply chain interruptions combined with a sudden boost of demand during the coronavirus pandemic. We shouldn’t worry much about a crash when buyers are eagerly snapping up the available homes.</p><p><blockquote>在大衰退之前,新房库存非常高。今天,它们更接近几十年来常见的水平。由于供应链中断加上冠状病毒大流行期间需求的突然增加,已建立并准备入住的库存部分特别低。当买家急于抢购现有房屋时,我们不应该太担心房屋崩盘。</blockquote></p><p> Yet there’s another reason to believe a housing crash is unlikely: Even the high level of inventory in 2005 wasn’t nearly as speculative as most people think. Understanding why will help us interpret today’s market.</p><p><blockquote>然而,还有另一个理由认为房地产崩盘的可能性不大: 即使是 2005 年的高库存水平,也远没有大多数人想象的那么具有投机性。了解原因将有助于我们解读当今的市场。</blockquote></p><p> In 2005, homes were being built because sales were high, and sales were high in parts of the country where demand was strong. Builders were conservatively scaling their inventories with rising sales. The same is true today.</p><p><blockquote>2005年,房屋正在建造,因为销售很高,在该国需求旺盛的部分地区销售也很高。随着销售额的增长,建筑商保守地扩大库存规模。今天也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Frequently, analysts cite the sharp rise in months of inventory—the number of months it will take to sell the current supply of homes being constructed for sale, at the current sales rate—as evidence of overzealous building during the last boom. But timing is key here. Decades of experience tell a clear story: Months of inventory is mostly a function of sales rather than builder speculation. When sales are strong, homes are turning over, and months of inventory tend to stay low. When sales quickly decline, builders tend to be left with unexpectedly high inventory.</p><p><blockquote>分析师经常引用库存月数的急剧上升——按目前的销售速度出售当前待售房屋供应量所需的月数——作为上次繁荣期间过度热情建筑的证据。但是时机是关键。几十年的经验告诉我们一个清晰的故事:几个月的库存主要是销售的功能,而不是建筑商的投机。当销售强劲时,房屋正在周转,几个月的库存往往会保持在较低水平。当销售额迅速下降时,建筑商往往会面临意想不到的高库存。</blockquote></p><p> From the late 1990s all the way up to the peak of new home sales in mid-2005,inventory was at historic lows, with about four months’ worth remaining. Of course, builders were creating more inventory to match growing sales, but it was barely enough to keep up with demand, so the number held fairly constant. Then, as economic growth started to slow, a deep drop in sales coincided with a sharp rise in months of inventory.</p><p><blockquote>从 20 世纪 90 年代末一直到 2005 年中期新房销售高峰,库存一直处于历史低位,只剩下大约四个月的价值。当然,建筑商正在创造更多的库存来匹配不断增长的销售,但这几乎不足以满足需求,因此数量保持相当稳定。然后,随着经济增长开始放缓,销售额的大幅下降与几个月来库存的急剧上升同时发生。</blockquote></p><p> Today, there are also about four months of inventory, and sales are around the same level as they were in the late 1990s. So, while it’s easy to look at on-the-ground activity and conclude that low inventory could cause bidding wars among buyers, we need to remember that buyers are really driving inventory more than the other way around. In other words, builders decide to create new homes when demand is high from buyers. If demand suddenly dries up, builders can’t suddenly make the inventory of homes under construction disappear.</p><p><blockquote>如今,还有大约四个月的库存,销售额与 20 世纪 90 年代末的水平大致相同。因此,虽然我们很容易从现场活动中得出低库存可能会导致买家之间的竞价战的结论,但我们需要记住,买家实际上是在推动库存,而不是相反。换句话说,当买家需求高时,建筑商决定建造新房。如果需求突然枯竭,建筑商不能让在建房屋的库存突然消失。</blockquote></p><p> Demand for new homes is something over which federal policy makers actually have some control. The Federal Reserve and other federal regulators should aim to avoid sharp declines in sales. The Fed can do this by raising or lowering interest rates, changing the money supply, and targeting changes in prices and nominal economic activity. Federal regulators can make sure that stable lending conditions are maintained, or not.One reasonthe Great Recession was so bad was that Federal Reserve officials and other federal regulators, generally responding to public sentiment, washed their hands of the horrendous collapse in sales and left homebuilders and sellers out to dry.</p><p><blockquote>联邦政策制定者实际上可以控制对新房的需求。美联储和其他联邦监管机构应致力于避免销售额急剧下降。美联储可以通过提高或降低利率、改变货币供应量以及瞄准价格和名义经济活动的变化来做到这一点。联邦监管机构可以确保保持稳定的贷款条件,也可以不保持稳定。大衰退如此严重的一个原因是,美联储官员和其他联邦监管机构通常会对公众情绪做出反应,对可怕的销售崩溃置之不理,让房屋建筑商和销售商自生自灭。</blockquote></p><p> But even in that worst-case scenario, the 2000s market was much more resilient than it seemed. In July 2005, when buyers backed off and months of inventory started to surge, the median U.S. home price was $198,000, according toZillow. In July 2008, when months of inventory was near its peak, it was still at $199,000.</p><p><blockquote>但即使在最坏的情况下,2000 年代的市场也比看起来更有弹性。据 toZillow 称,2005 年 7 月,当买家退出,几个月的库存开始激增时,美国房价中值为 198,000 美元。2008 年 7 月,当几个月的库存接近峰值时,库存仍处于 19.9 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> At the June 2006 Federal Reserve meeting, Ben Bernanke said, “It is a good thing that housing is cooling. If we could wave a magic wand and reinstate 2005, we wouldn’t want to do that.” It’s notable that Jerome Powell, who today holds Bernanke’s former position as Fed chair, isn’t openly pining for a “cooler” housing market.</p><p><blockquote>在 2006 年 6 月的美联储会议上,本-伯南克说:“房地产降温是件好事。如果我们能挥舞魔杖,恢复 2005 年,我们就不想这么做了。”值得注意的是,如今接替伯南克担任美联储主席的杰罗姆-鲍威尔(Jerome Powell)并没有公开渴望 “降温 ”的房地产市场。</blockquote></p><p> There is a common belief that before the Great Recession, homebuyers were taken in by themyththat home prices never go down, and they became complacent. Those buyers turned out to be wrong. Yet, even when a concerted effort to kill housing markets succeeded, we had to beat them into submission for three full years before prices relented. Home prices can go down, but we have to work very hard, together, for a long time, to make them fall.</p><p><blockquote>人们普遍认为,在大衰退之前,购房者被房价永远不会下跌的神话所迷惑,他们变得自满。那些买家被证明是错的。然而,即使在扼杀房地产市场的共同努力取得成功时,我们也不得不让它们屈服整整三年,房价才有所缓和。房价可能会下跌,但我们必须非常努力地工作,一起工作很长时间,才能让房价下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> If you are a buyer in a hot market where home prices are 30% higher than they were a year ago, you’re getting a 30% worse deal than you could have had back then. Nothing can be done about that. That said, the main things to be concerned with are the factors federal policymakers are in control of. There is little reason to expect housing demand to collapse. If it does, it will require communal intention—federal monetary and credit policies meant to create or accept a sharp drop in demand. And even if federal officials intend for housing construction to collapse, history suggests that a market contraction would push new sales down deeply for an extended period of time before prices relent.</p><p><blockquote>如果你是一个热门市场的买家,房价比一年前高出 30%,那么你得到的交易将比当时差 30%。对此无能为力。也就是说,主要关注的是联邦政策制定者可以控制的因素。几乎没有理由预期住房需求会崩溃。如果发生这种情况,它将需要公共意图——联邦货币和信贷政策旨在创造或接受需求的急剧下降。即使联邦官员希望住房建设崩溃,历史表明,在价格回落之前,市场萎缩将在很长一段时间内推动新销售大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Housing Prices Are Going Up. Must They Crash?<blockquote>房价在上涨。他们一定要坠毁吗?</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHousing Prices Are Going Up. Must They Crash?<blockquote>房价在上涨。他们一定要坠毁吗?</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-30 09:42</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices have appreciated by well more than 10% over the past year. This naturally leads to a concern about market volatility: Must what goes up comedown? Are werepeatingthe excesses of the early 2000s, when housing prices surged before the market crashed?</p><p><blockquote>有许多报道称购房者陷入竞购战,许多城市的房价在过去一年中上涨了 10% 以上。这自然会引发对市场波动的担忧:上涨的东西一定会下跌吗?我们是否正在重蹈21世纪初房价在市场崩溃前飙升的过度行为?</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts argue that this time, it’s even less likely that prices will fall.Inventoriesof new homes for sale are very low, and lending standards are much tighter than in 2005. This is true. In fact, the ground is even firmer than it seems.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师认为,这一次,房价下跌的可能性更小。待售新房库存非常低,贷款标准也比2005年严格得多。这是真的。事实上,地面比看起来还要坚实。</blockquote></p><p> New home inventories were very high before the Great Recession. Today, they are closer to the level that has been common for decades. The portion of inventory built and ready for move-in is especially low because of supply chain interruptions combined with a sudden boost of demand during the coronavirus pandemic. We shouldn’t worry much about a crash when buyers are eagerly snapping up the available homes.</p><p><blockquote>在大衰退之前,新房库存非常高。今天,它们更接近几十年来常见的水平。由于供应链中断加上冠状病毒大流行期间需求的突然增加,已建立并准备入住的库存部分特别低。当买家急于抢购现有房屋时,我们不应该太担心房屋崩盘。</blockquote></p><p> Yet there’s another reason to believe a housing crash is unlikely: Even the high level of inventory in 2005 wasn’t nearly as speculative as most people think. Understanding why will help us interpret today’s market.</p><p><blockquote>然而,还有另一个理由认为房地产崩盘的可能性不大: 即使是 2005 年的高库存水平,也远没有大多数人想象的那么具有投机性。了解原因将有助于我们解读当今的市场。</blockquote></p><p> In 2005, homes were being built because sales were high, and sales were high in parts of the country where demand was strong. Builders were conservatively scaling their inventories with rising sales. The same is true today.</p><p><blockquote>2005年,房屋正在建造,因为销售很高,在该国需求旺盛的部分地区销售也很高。随着销售额的增长,建筑商保守地扩大库存规模。今天也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Frequently, analysts cite the sharp rise in months of inventory—the number of months it will take to sell the current supply of homes being constructed for sale, at the current sales rate—as evidence of overzealous building during the last boom. But timing is key here. Decades of experience tell a clear story: Months of inventory is mostly a function of sales rather than builder speculation. When sales are strong, homes are turning over, and months of inventory tend to stay low. When sales quickly decline, builders tend to be left with unexpectedly high inventory.</p><p><blockquote>分析师经常引用库存月数的急剧上升——按目前的销售速度出售当前待售房屋供应量所需的月数——作为上次繁荣期间过度热情建筑的证据。但是时机是关键。几十年的经验告诉我们一个清晰的故事:几个月的库存主要是销售的功能,而不是建筑商的投机。当销售强劲时,房屋正在周转,几个月的库存往往会保持在较低水平。当销售额迅速下降时,建筑商往往会面临意想不到的高库存。</blockquote></p><p> From the late 1990s all the way up to the peak of new home sales in mid-2005,inventory was at historic lows, with about four months’ worth remaining. Of course, builders were creating more inventory to match growing sales, but it was barely enough to keep up with demand, so the number held fairly constant. Then, as economic growth started to slow, a deep drop in sales coincided with a sharp rise in months of inventory.</p><p><blockquote>从 20 世纪 90 年代末一直到 2005 年中期新房销售高峰,库存一直处于历史低位,只剩下大约四个月的价值。当然,建筑商正在创造更多的库存来匹配不断增长的销售,但这几乎不足以满足需求,因此数量保持相当稳定。然后,随着经济增长开始放缓,销售额的大幅下降与几个月来库存的急剧上升同时发生。</blockquote></p><p> Today, there are also about four months of inventory, and sales are around the same level as they were in the late 1990s. So, while it’s easy to look at on-the-ground activity and conclude that low inventory could cause bidding wars among buyers, we need to remember that buyers are really driving inventory more than the other way around. In other words, builders decide to create new homes when demand is high from buyers. If demand suddenly dries up, builders can’t suddenly make the inventory of homes under construction disappear.</p><p><blockquote>如今,还有大约四个月的库存,销售额与 20 世纪 90 年代末的水平大致相同。因此,虽然我们很容易从现场活动中得出低库存可能会导致买家之间的竞价战的结论,但我们需要记住,买家实际上是在推动库存,而不是相反。换句话说,当买家需求高时,建筑商决定建造新房。如果需求突然枯竭,建筑商不能让在建房屋的库存突然消失。</blockquote></p><p> Demand for new homes is something over which federal policy makers actually have some control. The Federal Reserve and other federal regulators should aim to avoid sharp declines in sales. The Fed can do this by raising or lowering interest rates, changing the money supply, and targeting changes in prices and nominal economic activity. Federal regulators can make sure that stable lending conditions are maintained, or not.One reasonthe Great Recession was so bad was that Federal Reserve officials and other federal regulators, generally responding to public sentiment, washed their hands of the horrendous collapse in sales and left homebuilders and sellers out to dry.</p><p><blockquote>联邦政策制定者实际上可以控制对新房的需求。美联储和其他联邦监管机构应致力于避免销售额急剧下降。美联储可以通过提高或降低利率、改变货币供应量以及瞄准价格和名义经济活动的变化来做到这一点。联邦监管机构可以确保保持稳定的贷款条件,也可以不保持稳定。大衰退如此严重的一个原因是,美联储官员和其他联邦监管机构通常会对公众情绪做出反应,对可怕的销售崩溃置之不理,让房屋建筑商和销售商自生自灭。</blockquote></p><p> But even in that worst-case scenario, the 2000s market was much more resilient than it seemed. In July 2005, when buyers backed off and months of inventory started to surge, the median U.S. home price was $198,000, according toZillow. In July 2008, when months of inventory was near its peak, it was still at $199,000.</p><p><blockquote>但即使在最坏的情况下,2000 年代的市场也比看起来更有弹性。据 toZillow 称,2005 年 7 月,当买家退出,几个月的库存开始激增时,美国房价中值为 198,000 美元。2008 年 7 月,当几个月的库存接近峰值时,库存仍处于 19.9 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> At the June 2006 Federal Reserve meeting, Ben Bernanke said, “It is a good thing that housing is cooling. If we could wave a magic wand and reinstate 2005, we wouldn’t want to do that.” It’s notable that Jerome Powell, who today holds Bernanke’s former position as Fed chair, isn’t openly pining for a “cooler” housing market.</p><p><blockquote>在 2006 年 6 月的美联储会议上,本-伯南克说:“房地产降温是件好事。如果我们能挥舞魔杖,恢复 2005 年,我们就不想这么做了。”值得注意的是,如今接替伯南克担任美联储主席的杰罗姆-鲍威尔(Jerome Powell)并没有公开渴望 “降温 ”的房地产市场。</blockquote></p><p> There is a common belief that before the Great Recession, homebuyers were taken in by themyththat home prices never go down, and they became complacent. Those buyers turned out to be wrong. Yet, even when a concerted effort to kill housing markets succeeded, we had to beat them into submission for three full years before prices relented. Home prices can go down, but we have to work very hard, together, for a long time, to make them fall.</p><p><blockquote>人们普遍认为,在大衰退之前,购房者被房价永远不会下跌的神话所迷惑,他们变得自满。那些买家被证明是错的。然而,即使在扼杀房地产市场的共同努力取得成功时,我们也不得不让它们屈服整整三年,房价才有所缓和。房价可能会下跌,但我们必须非常努力地工作,一起工作很长时间,才能让房价下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> If you are a buyer in a hot market where home prices are 30% higher than they were a year ago, you’re getting a 30% worse deal than you could have had back then. Nothing can be done about that. That said, the main things to be concerned with are the factors federal policymakers are in control of. There is little reason to expect housing demand to collapse. If it does, it will require communal intention—federal monetary and credit policies meant to create or accept a sharp drop in demand. And even if federal officials intend for housing construction to collapse, history suggests that a market contraction would push new sales down deeply for an extended period of time before prices relent.</p><p><blockquote>如果你是一个热门市场的买家,房价比一年前高出 30%,那么你得到的交易将比当时差 30%。对此无能为力。也就是说,主要关注的是联邦政策制定者可以控制的因素。几乎没有理由预期住房需求会崩溃。如果发生这种情况,它将需要公共意图——联邦货币和信贷政策旨在创造或接受需求的急剧下降。即使联邦官员希望住房建设崩溃,历史表明,在价格回落之前,市场萎缩将在很长一段时间内推动新销售大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/housing-prices-market-crash-51624912461?siteid=yhoof2\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/housing-prices-market-crash-51624912461?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187567340","content_text":"There are many reports of homebuyers getting into bidding wars and many cities where home prices have appreciated by well more than 10% over the past year. This naturally leads to a concern about market volatility: Must what goes up comedown? Are werepeatingthe excesses of the early 2000s, when housing prices surged before the market crashed?\nSome analysts argue that this time, it’s even less likely that prices will fall.Inventoriesof new homes for sale are very low, and lending standards are much tighter than in 2005. This is true. In fact, the ground is even firmer than it seems.\nNew home inventories were very high before the Great Recession. Today, they are closer to the level that has been common for decades. The portion of inventory built and ready for move-in is especially low because of supply chain interruptions combined with a sudden boost of demand during the coronavirus pandemic. We shouldn’t worry much about a crash when buyers are eagerly snapping up the available homes.\nYet there’s another reason to believe a housing crash is unlikely: Even the high level of inventory in 2005 wasn’t nearly as speculative as most people think. Understanding why will help us interpret today’s market.\nIn 2005, homes were being built because sales were high, and sales were high in parts of the country where demand was strong. Builders were conservatively scaling their inventories with rising sales. The same is true today.\nFrequently, analysts cite the sharp rise in months of inventory—the number of months it will take to sell the current supply of homes being constructed for sale, at the current sales rate—as evidence of overzealous building during the last boom. But timing is key here. Decades of experience tell a clear story: Months of inventory is mostly a function of sales rather than builder speculation. When sales are strong, homes are turning over, and months of inventory tend to stay low. When sales quickly decline, builders tend to be left with unexpectedly high inventory.\nFrom the late 1990s all the way up to the peak of new home sales in mid-2005,inventory was at historic lows, with about four months’ worth remaining. Of course, builders were creating more inventory to match growing sales, but it was barely enough to keep up with demand, so the number held fairly constant. Then, as economic growth started to slow, a deep drop in sales coincided with a sharp rise in months of inventory.\nToday, there are also about four months of inventory, and sales are around the same level as they were in the late 1990s. So, while it’s easy to look at on-the-ground activity and conclude that low inventory could cause bidding wars among buyers, we need to remember that buyers are really driving inventory more than the other way around. In other words, builders decide to create new homes when demand is high from buyers. If demand suddenly dries up, builders can’t suddenly make the inventory of homes under construction disappear.\nDemand for new homes is something over which federal policy makers actually have some control. The Federal Reserve and other federal regulators should aim to avoid sharp declines in sales. The Fed can do this by raising or lowering interest rates, changing the money supply, and targeting changes in prices and nominal economic activity. Federal regulators can make sure that stable lending conditions are maintained, or not.One reasonthe Great Recession was so bad was that Federal Reserve officials and other federal regulators, generally responding to public sentiment, washed their hands of the horrendous collapse in sales and left homebuilders and sellers out to dry.\nBut even in that worst-case scenario, the 2000s market was much more resilient than it seemed. In July 2005, when buyers backed off and months of inventory started to surge, the median U.S. home price was $198,000, according toZillow. In July 2008, when months of inventory was near its peak, it was still at $199,000.\nAt the June 2006 Federal Reserve meeting, Ben Bernanke said, “It is a good thing that housing is cooling. If we could wave a magic wand and reinstate 2005, we wouldn’t want to do that.” It’s notable that Jerome Powell, who today holds Bernanke’s former position as Fed chair, isn’t openly pining for a “cooler” housing market.\nThere is a common belief that before the Great Recession, homebuyers were taken in by themyththat home prices never go down, and they became complacent. Those buyers turned out to be wrong. Yet, even when a concerted effort to kill housing markets succeeded, we had to beat them into submission for three full years before prices relented. Home prices can go down, but we have to work very hard, together, for a long time, to make them fall.\nIf you are a buyer in a hot market where home prices are 30% higher than they were a year ago, you’re getting a 30% worse deal than you could have had back then. Nothing can be done about that. That said, the main things to be concerned with are the factors federal policymakers are in control of. There is little reason to expect housing demand to collapse. If it does, it will require communal intention—federal monetary and credit policies meant to create or accept a sharp drop in demand. And even if federal officials intend for housing construction to collapse, history suggests that a market contraction would push new sales down deeply for an extended period of time before prices relent.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2599,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349479666,"gmtCreate":1617634793155,"gmtModify":1634297401382,"author":{"id":"3573625719551490","authorId":"3573625719551490","name":"bane","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc8e3f417a294b78c7d27131c858156f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573625719551490","authorIdStr":"3573625719551490"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"🙌🏽","listText":"🙌🏽","text":"🙌🏽","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/349479666","repostId":"2125579247","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2125579247","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1617621115,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2125579247?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-05 19:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is The Era Of Meme Stocks And NFTs Already Over?<blockquote>迷因股票和NFT的时代已经结束了吗?</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2125579247","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-fr","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be46311cd2d33d0e3917aaedb8a121dc\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-free trading platforms, leading to an exuberant rise in prices this year.</p><p><blockquote>由于有了过多的刺激资金和时间,人们的注意力转向了免佣金交易平台,导致今年价格大幅上涨。</blockquote></p><p>Now, with vaccines rolling out, final stimulus checks being spent and warm weather returning, attention is returning to socializing and traveling.</p><p><blockquote>现在,随着疫苗的推出,最终刺激支票的使用和温暖天气的回归,注意力又回到了社交和旅行上。</blockquote></p><p><b>Memes Fall Flat</b>: So goes the explanation for why prices in meme stocks have been flat since the frenzy reached fever pitch in late January, according to Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote><b>表情包落平</b>据彭博社报道,这也解释了为什么自 1 月下旬狂热达到白热化以来,模因股票价格一直持平。</blockquote></p><p>Searches for “Google flights” reached their a popularity score of 100 (the highest possible for a given period of time) in the past week, while searches for phrases like “stock trading” and “investing” have plunged, Bloomberg said, citing Google Trends data.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社援引谷歌趋势数据称,过去一周,“谷歌航班 ”的搜索量达到了 100 分(在特定时间段内可能达到的最高分),而 “股票交易 ”和 “投资 ”等短语的搜索量则大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p>“The stimulus check impact on retail trading is waning,” Bloomberg quoted Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, as saying. “Many Americans are looking to go big on attending sporting events, traveling across the country, vacationing, visiting family and friends, and revamping wardrobes before going out to restaurants, pubs and returning to the office.”</p><p><blockquote>“彭博社援引 Oanda 高级市场分析师爱德华-莫亚(Edward Moya)的话说:”刺激措施对零售交易的影响正在减弱。“许多美国人都希望参加体育赛事、在全国各地旅行、度假、拜访家人和朋友,并在外出就餐、酒吧和回到办公室之前改造衣橱。”</blockquote></p><p>Retail traders accounted for nearly 25% of trading activity in the past year, up from an average of about 10% over the decade prior to the pandemic, Benzinga noted two weeks ago, citing Goldman Sachs.</p><p><blockquote>Benzinga 两周前援引高盛的话指出,过去一年,零售交易者占交易活动的近 25%,高于疫情爆发前十年的平均约 10%。</blockquote></p><p><b>NFT Prices Plunge</b>: Meanwhile, interest in another source of exuberance, non-fungible tokens, appears to be on the wane as well, just weeks after the $69.3 million Beeple artwork sale brought the digital innovation to the world's attention.</p><p><blockquote><b>NFT价格暴跌</b>与此同时,人们对另一个繁荣来源——不可替代代币——的兴趣似乎也在减弱,就在 6930 万美元的 Beeple 艺术品拍卖让数字创新引起了全世界的关注几周后。</blockquote></p><p>Average prices for NFTs peaked in February at about $1,400 but have fallen by almost 70% since then, according to Bloomberg, using data from NFT market-tracker Nonfungible.com.</p><p><blockquote>根据彭博社使用 NFT 市场跟踪器 Nonfungible.com 的数据,NFT 的平均价格在 2 月份达到约 1,400 美元的峰值,但此后已下跌近 70%。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin.com noted a decline in interest in NTFs. The site said search terms for NFTs have been falling since mid-March highs on Google in the U.S. and worldwide, though the numbers still remain high, mostly in the 90s.</p><p><blockquote>Bitcoin.com 注意到人们对 NTF 的兴趣有所下降。该网站表示,自3月中旬谷歌在美国和全球范围内的高点以来,NFT的搜索词一直在下降,尽管数字仍然很高,大部分在90年代。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin quoted an author who's written on NFTs saying that the market suffers from an oversupply as more people realize how easy NFTs are to create.</p><p><blockquote>比特币援引一位撰写 NFT 文章的作者的话说,随着越来越多的人意识到 NFT 是多么容易创建,市场正遭受供应过剩的困扰。</blockquote></p><p>NFTs are not likely to go away, as they represent a new innovation with promising uses for proving ownership and tracking ownership history, as well as for people's online identities.</p><p><blockquote>NFT不太可能消失,因为它们代表了一种新的创新,在证明所有权和跟踪所有权历史以及人们的在线身份方面有很好的用途。</blockquote></p><p>But the fall in prices suggests the recent boom was a temporary rush of excitement for a concept that's still taking shape.</p><p><blockquote>但价格下跌表明,最近的繁荣只是对一个仍在形成的概念的暂时兴奋。</blockquote></p><p>Before long, the meme stocks and NFTs of early 2021 may appear in retrospect to have been nothing more than the oddities of a feverish pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>不久之后,回想起来,2021 年初的模因股票和 NFT 可能只不过是狂热大流行的怪异之处。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is The Era Of Meme Stocks And NFTs Already Over?<blockquote>迷因股票和NFT的时代已经结束了吗?</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs The Era Of Meme Stocks And NFTs Already Over?<blockquote>迷因股票和NFT的时代已经结束了吗?</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-05 19:11</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be46311cd2d33d0e3917aaedb8a121dc\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-free trading platforms, leading to an exuberant rise in prices this year.</p><p><blockquote>由于有了过多的刺激资金和时间,人们的注意力转向了免佣金交易平台,导致今年价格大幅上涨。</blockquote></p><p>Now, with vaccines rolling out, final stimulus checks being spent and warm weather returning, attention is returning to socializing and traveling.</p><p><blockquote>现在,随着疫苗的推出,最终刺激支票的使用和温暖天气的回归,注意力又回到了社交和旅行上。</blockquote></p><p><b>Memes Fall Flat</b>: So goes the explanation for why prices in meme stocks have been flat since the frenzy reached fever pitch in late January, according to Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote><b>表情包落平</b>据彭博社报道,这也解释了为什么自 1 月下旬狂热达到白热化以来,模因股票价格一直持平。</blockquote></p><p>Searches for “Google flights” reached their a popularity score of 100 (the highest possible for a given period of time) in the past week, while searches for phrases like “stock trading” and “investing” have plunged, Bloomberg said, citing Google Trends data.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社援引谷歌趋势数据称,过去一周,“谷歌航班 ”的搜索量达到了 100 分(在特定时间段内可能达到的最高分),而 “股票交易 ”和 “投资 ”等短语的搜索量则大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p>“The stimulus check impact on retail trading is waning,” Bloomberg quoted Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, as saying. “Many Americans are looking to go big on attending sporting events, traveling across the country, vacationing, visiting family and friends, and revamping wardrobes before going out to restaurants, pubs and returning to the office.”</p><p><blockquote>“彭博社援引 Oanda 高级市场分析师爱德华-莫亚(Edward Moya)的话说:”刺激措施对零售交易的影响正在减弱。“许多美国人都希望参加体育赛事、在全国各地旅行、度假、拜访家人和朋友,并在外出就餐、酒吧和回到办公室之前改造衣橱。”</blockquote></p><p>Retail traders accounted for nearly 25% of trading activity in the past year, up from an average of about 10% over the decade prior to the pandemic, Benzinga noted two weeks ago, citing Goldman Sachs.</p><p><blockquote>Benzinga 两周前援引高盛的话指出,过去一年,零售交易者占交易活动的近 25%,高于疫情爆发前十年的平均约 10%。</blockquote></p><p><b>NFT Prices Plunge</b>: Meanwhile, interest in another source of exuberance, non-fungible tokens, appears to be on the wane as well, just weeks after the $69.3 million Beeple artwork sale brought the digital innovation to the world's attention.</p><p><blockquote><b>NFT价格暴跌</b>与此同时,人们对另一个繁荣来源——不可替代代币——的兴趣似乎也在减弱,就在 6930 万美元的 Beeple 艺术品拍卖让数字创新引起了全世界的关注几周后。</blockquote></p><p>Average prices for NFTs peaked in February at about $1,400 but have fallen by almost 70% since then, according to Bloomberg, using data from NFT market-tracker Nonfungible.com.</p><p><blockquote>根据彭博社使用 NFT 市场跟踪器 Nonfungible.com 的数据,NFT 的平均价格在 2 月份达到约 1,400 美元的峰值,但此后已下跌近 70%。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin.com noted a decline in interest in NTFs. The site said search terms for NFTs have been falling since mid-March highs on Google in the U.S. and worldwide, though the numbers still remain high, mostly in the 90s.</p><p><blockquote>Bitcoin.com 注意到人们对 NTF 的兴趣有所下降。该网站表示,自3月中旬谷歌在美国和全球范围内的高点以来,NFT的搜索词一直在下降,尽管数字仍然很高,大部分在90年代。</blockquote></p><p>Bitcoin quoted an author who's written on NFTs saying that the market suffers from an oversupply as more people realize how easy NFTs are to create.</p><p><blockquote>比特币援引一位撰写 NFT 文章的作者的话说,随着越来越多的人意识到 NFT 是多么容易创建,市场正遭受供应过剩的困扰。</blockquote></p><p>NFTs are not likely to go away, as they represent a new innovation with promising uses for proving ownership and tracking ownership history, as well as for people's online identities.</p><p><blockquote>NFT不太可能消失,因为它们代表了一种新的创新,在证明所有权和跟踪所有权历史以及人们的在线身份方面有很好的用途。</blockquote></p><p>But the fall in prices suggests the recent boom was a temporary rush of excitement for a concept that's still taking shape.</p><p><blockquote>但价格下跌表明,最近的繁荣只是对一个仍在形成的概念的暂时兴奋。</blockquote></p><p>Before long, the meme stocks and NFTs of early 2021 may appear in retrospect to have been nothing more than the oddities of a feverish pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>不久之后,回想起来,2021 年初的模因股票和 NFT 可能只不过是狂热大流行的怪异之处。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/acc24e12c653fec8b3649aea7072da90","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","GOOGL":"谷歌A",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","09086":"华夏纳指-U","03086":"华夏纳指",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","GOOG":"谷歌"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2125579247","content_text":"With an excess of stimulus money and time on their hands, people's attention landed on commission-free trading platforms, leading to an exuberant rise in prices this year.Now, with vaccines rolling out, final stimulus checks being spent and warm weather returning, attention is returning to socializing and traveling.Memes Fall Flat: So goes the explanation for why prices in meme stocks have been flat since the frenzy reached fever pitch in late January, according to Bloomberg.Searches for “Google flights” reached their a popularity score of 100 (the highest possible for a given period of time) in the past week, while searches for phrases like “stock trading” and “investing” have plunged, Bloomberg said, citing Google Trends data.“The stimulus check impact on retail trading is waning,” Bloomberg quoted Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, as saying. “Many Americans are looking to go big on attending sporting events, traveling across the country, vacationing, visiting family and friends, and revamping wardrobes before going out to restaurants, pubs and returning to the office.”Retail traders accounted for nearly 25% of trading activity in the past year, up from an average of about 10% over the decade prior to the pandemic, Benzinga noted two weeks ago, citing Goldman Sachs.NFT Prices Plunge: Meanwhile, interest in another source of exuberance, non-fungible tokens, appears to be on the wane as well, just weeks after the $69.3 million Beeple artwork sale brought the digital innovation to the world's attention.Average prices for NFTs peaked in February at about $1,400 but have fallen by almost 70% since then, according to Bloomberg, using data from NFT market-tracker Nonfungible.com.Bitcoin.com noted a decline in interest in NTFs. The site said search terms for NFTs have been falling since mid-March highs on Google in the U.S. and worldwide, though the numbers still remain high, mostly in the 90s.Bitcoin quoted an author who's written on NFTs saying that the market suffers from an oversupply as more people realize how easy NFTs are to create.NFTs are not likely to go away, as they represent a new innovation with promising uses for proving ownership and tracking ownership history, as well as for people's online identities.But the fall in prices suggests the recent boom was a temporary rush of excitement for a concept that's still taking shape.Before long, the meme stocks and NFTs of early 2021 may appear in retrospect to have been nothing more than the oddities of a feverish pandemic.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9,"09086":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"03086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":739,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}