stonker的个人主页 - 老虎社区

stonker

stonker

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

134关注

4粉丝

2主题

0勋章

2021-08-16

Ouo

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-07

Lies

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-09-11

Mmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-11

Memes

The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>

2021-08-25

Sp

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-23

Wu

Fed to keep pumping roughly $1 trillion of liquidity into markets during tapering, JPMorgan says<blockquote>摩根大通表示，美联储将在缩减规模期间继续向市场注入约 1 万亿美元流动性</blockquote>

2021-08-12

Yo

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-10

Nic

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-13

Yo

Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>

2021-07-29

Hi

S&P 500 ends off day's lows; Powell says Fed still a ways away from rate hikes<blockquote>标普500结束当日低点；鲍威尔表示美联储距离加息还有一段路要走</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574899797175889","uuid":"3574899797175889","gmtCreate":1611805773697,"gmtModify":1624462285877,"name":"stonker","pinyin":"stonker","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":134,"tweetSize":47,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":2,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-4","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"明星虎友","description":"加入老虎社区2000天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.07.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":884384554,"gmtCreate":1631857562078,"gmtModify":1631889730854,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Kk","listText":"Kk","text":"Kk","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/884384554","repostId":"1123462915","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123462915","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631856299,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1123462915?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-17 13:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Further Trims Tesla Stake, Selling $31.4M Shares On Thursday<blockquote>Cathie Wood 进一步减持特斯拉股份，周四出售 3,140 万美元股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123462915","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Cathie Wood-led Ark Investhas reduced its exposure in Tesla Inc, by an estimated $300 million so far","content":"<p><div> Cathie Wood-led Ark Investhas reduced its exposure in Tesla Inc, by an estimated $300 million so far in September as the popular investment management firm further sold shares in the electric vehicle ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Cathie Wood领导的Ark investment在9月份迄今为止减少了对特斯拉公司的投资，估计减少了3亿美元，因为这家受欢迎的投资管理公司进一步出售了电动汽车的股份……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/09/22982385/cathie-wood-further-trims-tesla-stake-selling-31-4m-shares-on-thursday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/09/22982385/cathie-wood-further-trims-tesla-stake-selling-31-4m-shares-on-thursday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Further Trims Tesla Stake, Selling $31.4M Shares On Thursday<blockquote>Cathie Wood 进一步减持特斯拉股份，周四出售 3,140 万美元股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Further Trims Tesla Stake, Selling $31.4M Shares On Thursday<blockquote>Cathie Wood 进一步减持特斯拉股份，周四出售 3,140 万美元股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-09-17 13:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Cathie Wood-led Ark Investhas reduced its exposure in Tesla Inc, by an estimated $300 million so far in September as the popular investment management firm further sold shares in the electric vehicle ...</p><p><blockquote><div>Cathie Wood领导的Ark investment在9月份迄今为止减少了对特斯拉公司的投资，估计减少了3亿美元，因为这家受欢迎的投资管理公司进一步出售了电动汽车的股份……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/09/22982385/cathie-wood-further-trims-tesla-stake-selling-31-4m-shares-on-thursday\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/09/22982385/cathie-wood-further-trims-tesla-stake-selling-31-4m-shares-on-thursday\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/09/22982385/cathie-wood-further-trims-tesla-stake-selling-31-4m-shares-on-thursday\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/09/22982385/cathie-wood-further-trims-tesla-stake-selling-31-4m-shares-on-thursday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123462915","content_text":"Cathie Wood-led Ark Investhas reduced its exposure in Tesla Inc, by an estimated $300 million so far in September as the popular investment management firm further sold shares in the electric vehicle maker on Thursday.\nThe New York-based Ark Invest sold 41,457 shares — estimated to be worth about $31.4 million — in Tesla stock, which closed 0.15% higher at $756.99 per share on Thursday.\nShares of the company have risen 2.9% so far this month and about 3.7% since the beginning of the year.\nWood, who is a dedicated Tesla bull, sold shares in the Palo Alto, California-based company via the Ark Innovation ETF\nARKK on Thursday. Two other ETFs — the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF and the ArkAutonomous Technology & Robotics ETF(BATS:ARKQ) — own shares in Tesla.\nThe three ETFs held a total of about 4.14 million shares — worth $3.12 billion — in the electric vehicle company, ahead of Thursday’s trades.\nWith the latest sales, Ark Invest has trimmed a total of 395,638 shares — estimated to be worth about $299.1 million — in Tesla so far this month.\nThe popular investment management firm has a large exposure in Tesla, a stock it predicts will hit the$3,000 mark at the end of 2025.\nArk Invest hasn't yet provided any context around the recent selling in Tesla. Wood’s firm bought most of Tesla shares at far lower levels and the money manager has said the firm isn't hesitant in booking profits on portfolio companies when they run up too high and then buy back at lower prices once they retreat.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2350,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":882085601,"gmtCreate":1631631489903,"gmtModify":1631889730863,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/882085601","repostId":"2167630550","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2844,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":888437482,"gmtCreate":1631517552146,"gmtModify":1631889730879,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ioooo","listText":"Ioooo","text":"Ioooo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/888437482","repostId":"2167302669","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2491,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":881582311,"gmtCreate":1631363889133,"gmtModify":1631889730891,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"&nbsp;Mmm","listText":"&nbsp;Mmm","text":"Mmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/881582311","repostId":"2166372458","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2567,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":815890625,"gmtCreate":1630662353167,"gmtModify":1631889730902,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Oo","listText":"Oo","text":"Oo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/815890625","repostId":"1171764870","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2404,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":816546246,"gmtCreate":1630509447585,"gmtModify":1631889730917,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/816546246","repostId":"2164818033","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3760,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810333567,"gmtCreate":1629943329659,"gmtModify":1631889730927,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ooo","listText":"Ooo","text":"Ooo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/810333567","repostId":"1126255492","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126255492","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629942614,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1126255492?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-26 09:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Purdue Pharma Says Its Bankruptcy Deal Is Fairest to Creditors<blockquote>普渡制药称其破产协议对债权人来说是最公平的</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126255492","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- During the final day of argument in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy trial, lawyers for the","content":"<p><div> (Bloomberg) -- During the final day of argument in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy trial, lawyers for the OxyContin maker said its proposed $10 billion settlement of opioid claims is by far the best deal ...</p><p><blockquote><div>(彭博社）--在普渡制药公司破产审判的最后一天辩论中，奥施康定制造商的律师表示，该公司提出的 100 亿美元阿片类药物索赔和解方案是迄今为止最好的交易...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/purdue-pharma-says-bankruptcy-deal-184708963.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/purdue-pharma-says-bankruptcy-deal-184708963.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Purdue Pharma Says Its Bankruptcy Deal Is Fairest to Creditors<blockquote>普渡制药称其破产协议对债权人来说是最公平的</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPurdue Pharma Says Its Bankruptcy Deal Is Fairest to Creditors<blockquote>普渡制药称其破产协议对债权人来说是最公平的</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Bloomberg</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-26 09:50</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> (Bloomberg) -- During the final day of argument in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy trial, lawyers for the OxyContin maker said its proposed $10 billion settlement of opioid claims is by far the best deal ...</p><p><blockquote><div>(彭博社）--在普渡制药公司破产审判的最后一天辩论中，奥施康定制造商的律师表示，该公司提出的 100 亿美元阿片类药物索赔和解方案是迄今为止最好的交易...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/purdue-pharma-says-bankruptcy-deal-184708963.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/purdue-pharma-says-bankruptcy-deal-184708963.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/purdue-pharma-says-bankruptcy-deal-184708963.html\">Bloomberg</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/purdue-pharma-says-bankruptcy-deal-184708963.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126255492","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- During the final day of argument in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy trial, lawyers for the OxyContin maker said its proposed $10 billion settlement of opioid claims is by far the best deal for creditors.\nSeeking to convince U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain that Purdue’s proposal is better than a liquidation of the business and free-for-all litigation stampede against itself and its owners, Marshall Huebner of Davis Polk & Wardwell, said the plan would deliver at least $5.5 billion of cash to creditors. The fact that most U.S. states now support the deal rather than pushing to continue their own “speculative” lawsuits shows the deal is sufficient, he added.\n“Except for lawyers, nobody does better in a liquidation,” Huebner said. “No one has ever said ‘I know a better way where creditors get more,’ or ‘I know a better way where victims get more redress,’” he said of the plan.\nStill, about 10 state attorneys general are challenging the deal, arguing in large part that they should be able to sue Purdue’s owners, members of the billionaire Sackler family, regardless of the settlement. Purdue has said that wouldn’t work, because its owners are requiring broad legal immunity from opioid lawsuits in exchange for more than $4 billion of their own cash, and allowing some states to go forward would cause the entire settlement to unravel. Members of the Sackler family have previously denied any wrongdoing.\nWest Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey took the podium on Wednesday to challenge the deal’s methodology for deciding how much money each state gets, arguing that West Virginia has been disproportionately harmed by opioids and should get a bigger piece of the settlement.\n“This is the number one issue facing our state,” Morrisey told Judge Drain. “What this court decides to do is likely going to set a precedent going forward” in other opioid litigation, he said.\nBefore the hearing, lawyers for Purdue and members of the Sackler family said they further narrowed and more clearly defined the releases that would be granted under the plan, in response comments from Judge Drain. They also said they are continuing to work with those still opposing the plan, with the help of Judge Shelley Chapman as mediator, to resolve outstanding issues.\nLater in the hearing, Judge Drain became frustrated at the status of the releases that would be granted to the Sacklers and related entities, explaining that their most recent iteration is still too broad. “Time’s a wasting,” he said to a lawyer for one wing of the Sackler family.\nDrain expects to rule on Purdue’s proposed settlement on Friday. That could be delayed if parties need more time to negotiate, he said.\nThe bankruptcy case is Purdue Pharma LP, 19-23649, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (White Plains).","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2261,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":837578401,"gmtCreate":1629902312803,"gmtModify":1631889730941,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Sp","listText":"Sp","text":"Sp","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/837578401","repostId":"2162087564","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2892,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":835469995,"gmtCreate":1629732365117,"gmtModify":1631889730952,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Wu","listText":"Wu","text":"Wu","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/835469995","repostId":"2161177144","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2161177144","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1629732054,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2161177144?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-23 23:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed to keep pumping roughly $1 trillion of liquidity into markets during tapering, JPMorgan says<blockquote>摩根大通表示，美联储将在缩减规模期间继续向市场注入约 1 万亿美元流动性</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2161177144","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $8","content":"<p>Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system,' JPM strategists write</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通策略师写道，假设美联储明年8月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到8500亿美元至1万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系”</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/141450195b75f13f45c2e7df7f920463\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC. is pictured, above, in file photo taken this month.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>DC华盛顿州的美联储大楼。上图是本月拍摄的档案照片。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Federal Reserve policy makers will still be injecting roughly $1 trillion into markets during the time it takes to start and end the tapering of $120 billion in monthly bond purchases, according to strategists.</p><p><blockquote>策略师表示，在开始和结束每月1200亿美元债券购买规模缩减期间，美联储政策制定者仍将向市场注入约1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> That assumes an announcement comes in December and it takes eight months to complete the pullback, strategists Teresa Ho and Alex Roever at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(JPM)$</a> wrote in a note released Sunday, reiterating similar views they made on Aug. 6. </p><p><blockquote>摩根大通 (JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co) 策略师 Teresa Ho 和 Alex Roever 表示，这假设在 12 月发布公告，并且需要八个月的时间才能完成回调。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(摩根大通)$</a>在周日发布的一份说明中写道，重申了他们在8月6日表达的类似观点。</blockquote></p><p> Amid this week's start to the Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual symposium, investors will be keeping a close eye on when and by how much the central bank might be paring back on its purchases -- which many regard as scaling back on stimulus. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&amp;P 500 index booked their worst declines in a month on Aug. 18 after Fed minutes showed most officials backing a start of tapering this year.</p><p><blockquote>在本周堪萨斯城美联储年度研讨会开始之际，投资者将密切关注美联储可能何时以及削减多少购买——许多人认为这是缩减刺激措施。8 月 18 日，美联储会议纪要显示大多数官员支持今年开始缩减规模，道琼斯工业平均指数和标普500指数创下一个月来最严重的跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> But as JPMorgan's note points out, the Fed would still be supplying stimulus -- just at a reduced pace -- and the abundance of a cash already in the system will still keep growing.</p><p><blockquote>但正如摩根大通的报告指出的那样，美联储仍将提供刺激措施——只是速度有所放缓——而且系统中已有的现金充裕程度仍将继续增长。</blockquote></p><p> \"We continue to think a tapering announcement would come in December, though the risk of an announcement in November has increased,\" the strategists wrote. \"Realistically, the timing difference between November and December is $120bn/mo. more in asset purchases.\" Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, \"this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system.\"</p><p><blockquote>策略师写道：“我们仍然认为缩减规模的公告将在 12 月发布，尽管 11 月宣布的风险有所增加。”“实际上，11 月和 12 月之间的时间差为每月 1200 亿美元。更多的是资产购买。”假设美联储明年 8 月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到 8500 亿美元至 1 万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系。”</blockquote></p><p> The strategists also weighed in on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's future, by reiterating JPMorgan's view that there's \"a significant chance\" he won't be renominated when his term ends in February 2022.</p><p><blockquote>策略师们还对美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的未来进行了权衡，重申了摩根大通的观点，即他在 2022 年 2 月任期结束时“很有可能”不会获得连任。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed to keep pumping roughly $1 trillion of liquidity into markets during tapering, JPMorgan says<blockquote>摩根大通表示，美联储将在缩减规模期间继续向市场注入约 1 万亿美元流动性</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed to keep pumping roughly $1 trillion of liquidity into markets during tapering, JPMorgan says<blockquote>摩根大通表示，美联储将在缩减规模期间继续向市场注入约 1 万亿美元流动性</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-23 23:20</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system,' JPM strategists write</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通策略师写道，假设美联储明年8月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到8500亿美元至1万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系”</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/141450195b75f13f45c2e7df7f920463\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC. is pictured, above, in file photo taken this month.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>DC华盛顿州的美联储大楼。上图是本月拍摄的档案照片。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Federal Reserve policy makers will still be injecting roughly $1 trillion into markets during the time it takes to start and end the tapering of $120 billion in monthly bond purchases, according to strategists.</p><p><blockquote>策略师表示，在开始和结束每月1200亿美元债券购买规模缩减期间，美联储政策制定者仍将向市场注入约1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> That assumes an announcement comes in December and it takes eight months to complete the pullback, strategists Teresa Ho and Alex Roever at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(JPM)$</a> wrote in a note released Sunday, reiterating similar views they made on Aug. 6. </p><p><blockquote>摩根大通 (JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co) 策略师 Teresa Ho 和 Alex Roever 表示，这假设在 12 月发布公告，并且需要八个月的时间才能完成回调。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(摩根大通)$</a>在周日发布的一份说明中写道，重申了他们在8月6日表达的类似观点。</blockquote></p><p> Amid this week's start to the Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual symposium, investors will be keeping a close eye on when and by how much the central bank might be paring back on its purchases -- which many regard as scaling back on stimulus. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&amp;P 500 index booked their worst declines in a month on Aug. 18 after Fed minutes showed most officials backing a start of tapering this year.</p><p><blockquote>在本周堪萨斯城美联储年度研讨会开始之际，投资者将密切关注美联储可能何时以及削减多少购买——许多人认为这是缩减刺激措施。8 月 18 日，美联储会议纪要显示大多数官员支持今年开始缩减规模，道琼斯工业平均指数和标普500指数创下一个月来最严重的跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> But as JPMorgan's note points out, the Fed would still be supplying stimulus -- just at a reduced pace -- and the abundance of a cash already in the system will still keep growing.</p><p><blockquote>但正如摩根大通的报告指出的那样，美联储仍将提供刺激措施——只是速度有所放缓——而且系统中已有的现金充裕程度仍将继续增长。</blockquote></p><p> \"We continue to think a tapering announcement would come in December, though the risk of an announcement in November has increased,\" the strategists wrote. \"Realistically, the timing difference between November and December is $120bn/mo. more in asset purchases.\" Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, \"this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system.\"</p><p><blockquote>策略师写道：“我们仍然认为缩减规模的公告将在 12 月发布，尽管 11 月宣布的风险有所增加。”“实际上，11 月和 12 月之间的时间差为每月 1200 亿美元。更多的是资产购买。”假设美联储明年 8 月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到 8500 亿美元至 1 万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系。”</blockquote></p><p> The strategists also weighed in on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's future, by reiterating JPMorgan's view that there's \"a significant chance\" he won't be renominated when his term ends in February 2022.</p><p><blockquote>策略师们还对美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的未来进行了权衡，重申了摩根大通的观点，即他在 2022 年 2 月任期结束时“很有可能”不会获得连任。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-to-keep-pumping-roughly-1-trillion-of-liquidity-into-markets-during-tapering-jpmorgan-says-11629731508?mod=hp_LATEST\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-to-keep-pumping-roughly-1-trillion-of-liquidity-into-markets-during-tapering-jpmorgan-says-11629731508?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2161177144","content_text":"Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system,' JPM strategists write\nThe Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC. is pictured, above, in file photo taken this month.\nFederal Reserve policy makers will still be injecting roughly $1 trillion into markets during the time it takes to start and end the tapering of $120 billion in monthly bond purchases, according to strategists.\nThat assumes an announcement comes in December and it takes eight months to complete the pullback, strategists Teresa Ho and Alex Roever at JPMorgan Chase & Co. $(JPM)$ wrote in a note released Sunday, reiterating similar views they made on Aug. 6. \nAmid this week's start to the Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual symposium, investors will be keeping a close eye on when and by how much the central bank might be paring back on its purchases -- which many regard as scaling back on stimulus. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 index booked their worst declines in a month on Aug. 18 after Fed minutes showed most officials backing a start of tapering this year.\nBut as JPMorgan's note points out, the Fed would still be supplying stimulus -- just at a reduced pace -- and the abundance of a cash already in the system will still keep growing.\n\"We continue to think a tapering announcement would come in December, though the risk of an announcement in November has increased,\" the strategists wrote. \"Realistically, the timing difference between November and December is $120bn/mo. more in asset purchases.\" Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, \"this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system.\"\nThe strategists also weighed in on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's future, by reiterating JPMorgan's view that there's \"a significant chance\" he won't be renominated when his term ends in February 2022.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2022,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832615361,"gmtCreate":1629619237653,"gmtModify":1631889730963,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ni","listText":"Ni","text":"Ni","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832615361","repostId":"2161374148","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3330,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830552815,"gmtCreate":1629083741037,"gmtModify":1631891882380,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ouo","listText":"Ouo","text":"Ouo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830552815","repostId":"2159246152","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":778,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897026189,"gmtCreate":1628863908041,"gmtModify":1631891882384,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Yo","listText":"Yo","text":"Yo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897026189","repostId":"2159903472","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159903472","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628863309,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2159903472?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-13 22:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159903472","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE: XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XL）周五股价走低，此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分，低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元，低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信，市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚，然而，供应链问题和关键材料（尤其是微芯片）的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业，严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为：</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元，最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时，该股下跌 6.90%，至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-13 22:01</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XL）周五股价走低，此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分，低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元，低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信，市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚，然而，供应链问题和关键材料（尤其是微芯片）的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业，严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为：</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元，最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时，该股下跌 6.90%，至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159903472","content_text":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.\nXL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.\nWe believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said Dimitri Kazarinoff, CEO of XL Fleet.\nXL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.\nPrice Action: XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.\nAt last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":895861709,"gmtCreate":1628733844301,"gmtModify":1631891882387,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Yo","listText":"Yo","text":"Yo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/895861709","repostId":"1146833505","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1137,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892286794,"gmtCreate":1628664921618,"gmtModify":1631891882391,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892286794","repostId":"1147144306","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147144306","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628651652,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1147144306?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 11:14","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"What stocks and sectors will benefit from the infrastructure bill?<blockquote>哪些股票和行业将从基础设施法案中受益？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147144306","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"What assets are set to score a boost after the U.S. Senate passed a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure package with broad bipartisan support Tuesday, putting it on track to possibly be passed by the House and be signed into law by President Joe Biden?Thebill reauthorizes spendingon existing federal public-works programs and pours a fresh $550 billion into water projects, the electrical grid and safety efforts. It includes $110 billion for roads, bridges and other projects, as well as $66 billion","content":"<p>What assets are set to score a boost after the U.S. Senate passed a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure package with broad bipartisan support Tuesday, putting it on track to possibly be passed by the House and be signed into law by President Joe Biden?</p><p><blockquote>在美国之后，哪些资产将获得提振。参议院周二在两党广泛支持下通过了一项约1万亿美元的基础设施建设方案，使其有可能在众议院获得通过，并由乔·拜登总统签署成为法律？</blockquote></p><p> Thebill reauthorizes spendingon existing federal public-works programs and pours a fresh $550 billion into water projects, the electrical grid and safety efforts. It includes $110 billion for roads, bridges and other projects, as well as $66 billion for rail, $65 billion for broadband internet and $55 billion for water systems.</p><p><blockquote>该法案重新授权现有联邦公共工程项目的支出，并向供水项目、电网和安全工作注入新的5500亿美元。其中包括1100亿美元用于道路、桥梁和其他项目，以及660亿美元用于铁路、650亿美元用于宽带互联网和550亿美元用于供水系统。</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts say that much of the bill’s positive impact on the economy have already been priced into financial markets but it is possible that a further fillip for stocks could be enjoyed, especially as worries linger about the potential for the delta variant of COVID-19 to stymie aspects of the economic recovery from the deadly pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师说，该法案对经济的大部分积极影响已经被金融市场所消化，但股市有可能进一步受到提振，尤其是在人们仍然担心 COVID-19 德尔塔变异毒株可能会阻碍经济从致命大流行病中复苏的各个方面。</blockquote></p><p> “The passage of the&nbsp;infrastructure&nbsp;bill is a nice headline but unlikely to be a big market mover at this point,” wrote Brian Price, head of investment management at Commonwealth Financial Network in emailed remarks.</p><p><blockquote>“联邦金融网（Commonwealth Financial Network）投资管理主管布莱恩-普莱斯（Brian Price）在电子邮件评论中写道：”基础设施法案的通过是一个不错的头条新闻，但目前不太可能成为一个巨大的市场推动者。</blockquote></p><p> “I think a lot of the enthusiasm has been priced in over the past few weeks and investors are focused on other factors at this point,” he said, perhaps, referring to investors’ current fixation over the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will taper its monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, which had helped to stabilize the market during the height the pandemic back in March and April of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>“他说：”我认为，在过去的几周里，很多人的热情都被消化了，投资者目前正关注其他因素。他说，这或许指的是投资者目前对美联储可能逐步减少每月1200亿美元的国债和抵押贷款支持证券购买量的关注，而这在2020年3月和4月大流行病最严重的时候曾帮助稳定了市场。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the stock market was headed higher on Tuesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.46%and S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%at or near all-time closing highs, after the bill’s passage in the Upper chamber, with a 69-to-30 vote, with 19 Republicans also joining the Democratic yeas, The Wall Street Journal reported.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，周二股市仍走高，道琼斯工业平均指数（Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA）上涨0.46%，标准普尔500SPX上涨0.10%，创下或接近历史收盘高点。据《华尔街日报》报道，该法案在上议院以69票对30票获得通过，19名共和党人也加入了民主党的行列。</blockquote></p><p> A popular exchange-traded fund that offers exposure to stocks that would benefit from an infrastructure bill, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EFFE\">Global X</a> U.S. Infrastructure Development ETFPAVE,+2.19%,was up 2.2% on Tuesday and has climbed 4.7% within the past 30 days, FactSet data show.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d21f2ed025a84fdc2840732cbf4dff62\" tg-width=\"825\" tg-height=\"525\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Pave the way higher?The 'PAVE' ETF has been rising over the past 30 daysGlobal X US Infrastructure Development ETFSource: FactSetAs of Aug. 10, 4 p.m. ETJune 2021Aug.24.525.025.526.026.527.0$27.5</p><p><blockquote>这是一只受欢迎的交易所交易基金，提供受益于基础设施法案的股票敞口<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EFFE\">全球X</a>FactSet 数据显示，美国基础设施发展 ETFPAVE(+2.19%) 周二上涨 2.2%，过去 30 天内上涨 4.7%。铺路更高？“PAVE”ETF 在过去 30 天里一直在上涨Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF 资料来源：FactSetAs 8 月 10 日下午 4 点ET2021年6月Aug.24.525.025.526.026.527.0$27.5</blockquote></p><p> PAVE, referring to the infrastructure ETFs ticker symbol is up 28% so far in 2021, compared with year-to-date gains of around 15% for the S&amp;P 500 and the Dow.</p><p><blockquote>PAVE（指基础设施 ETF 股票代码）在 2021 年迄今已上涨 28%，而标普500和道琼斯指数今年迄今已上涨约 15%。</blockquote></p><p> PAVE holds 100 stocks, from small-cap to large-cap companies, that derive at least 50% of revenue from infrastructure construction, materials and equipment supply and related services in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>PAVE 持有 100 只股票，从小盘股到大盘股公司，这些公司至少 50% 的收入来自美国的基础设施建设、材料和设备供应以及相关服务。</blockquote></p><p> Similarly, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IFRA\">iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF</a>IFRA,+1.45%,another way to play infrastructure, rose 1.3% on Tuesday and is up nearly 22% in the first eight months of the year. The iShares ETF also includes 20 electric utilities and four water utilities, and for that reason isn’t always viewed as a pure-play infrastructure fund.</p><p><blockquote>同样，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IFRA\">iShares 美国基础设施 ETF</a>IFRA 上涨 1.45%，是另一种投资基础设施的方式，周二上涨 1.3%，今年前八个月上涨近 22%。iShares ETF 还包括 20 家电力公司和 4 家水务公司，因此并不总是被视为纯粹的基础设施基金。</blockquote></p><p> The Industrial <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SLCT\">Select</a> Sector SPDR ETFXLI,+1.02%,which tracks the S&amp;P 500’s industrial sector, was up 1% on Tuesday and has gained nearly 18% in the year so far.</p><p><blockquote>工业<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SLCT\">选择</a>跟踪标普500工业部门的 SPDR ETFXLI,+1.02%，周二上涨 1%，今年迄今已上涨近 18%。</blockquote></p><p> Back in the spring MarketWatch’s Philip van Doorn wrote that there are about 20 companies that are included in PAVE that might have the most upsidepotential for investors. Those include <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TISI\">Team</a> Inc., which was up 4.4% on Tuesday but has declined 56% in the year to date and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PRIM\">Primoris</a>, which was up 2.9% on the day but down 3.6% so far this year.</p><p><blockquote>早在春季，MarketWatch 的菲利普-范-多恩（Philip van Doorn）就写道，PAVE 中大约有 20 家公司可能对投资者来说最具上涨潜力。其中包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TISI\">团队</a>周二上涨 4.4%，但今年迄今已下跌 56%<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PRIM\">滨海</a>当天上涨 2.9%，但今年迄今已下跌 3.6%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <table>  <tbody>   <tr>    <td><b>Company names</b></td>    <td><b>YTD % return</b></td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Team Inc.TISI,+4.37%</td>    <td>-56.83</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Primoris Services Corp.PRIM,+2.90%</td>    <td>-3.6%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMCO\">Columbus McKinnon</a> Corp.CMCO,+2.03%</td>    <td>17.6%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLDR\">Builders FirstSource</a> Inc.BLDR,+2.72%</td>    <td>19.6%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMS\">Advanced Drainage</a> Systems Inc.WMS,+1.89%</td>    <td>40%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AIMCV\">Altra Industrial Motion Corp.</a>AIMC,+3.15%</td>    <td>10.5%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DY\">Dycom</a> IndustriesDY,-0.96%</td>    <td>-5.7%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.CLF,+5.05%</td>    <td>78.7%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RXN\">Rexnord</a> Corp.RXN,+1.91%</td>    <td>51%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HRI\">Herc</a> Holdings Inc.HRI,+2.28%</td>    <td>90%</td>   </tr>  </tbody> </table> Overall, the investment in infrastructure is the biggest investment in roads, bridges and tunnels and other areas of America’s inner workings in a generation.</p><p><blockquote><table><tbody><tr><td><b>公司名称</b></td><td><b>年初至今百分比回报率</b></td></tr><tr><td>Team Inc.TISI,+4.37%</td><td>-56.83</td></tr><tr><td>Primoris Services Corp.PRIM,+2.90%</td><td>-3.6%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMCO\">哥伦布·麦金农</a>CMCO公司，+2.03%</td><td>17.6%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLDR\">建筑商第一来源</a>公司BLDR，+2.72%</td><td>19.6%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMS\">高级引流</a>Systems Inc.WMS,+1.89%</td><td>40%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AIMCV\">阿尔特拉工业运动公司。</a>AIMC，+3.15%</td><td>10.5%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DY\">戴康</a>工业日，-0.96%</td><td>-5.7%</td></tr><tr><td>克利夫兰悬崖公司 CLF,+5.05%</td><td>78.7%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RXN\">雷克斯诺德</a>RXN公司，+1.91%</td><td>51%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HRI\">赫克</a>控股公司HRI,+2.28%</td><td>90%</td></tr></tbody></table>总体而言，基础设施投资是一代人以来对道路、桥梁、隧道和美国内部运作其他领域最大的投资。</blockquote></p><p> Edward Moya, analyst at Oanda, said that the infrastructure package, should it get quickly passed by the House, is very constructive in “driving the cyclical trade,” particularly as there have been concerns about the delta variant of COVID.</p><p><blockquote>Oanda 分析师 Edward Moya 说，基础设施一揽子计划如果能在众议院迅速获得通过，将对 “推动周期性贸易 ”非常有建设性，尤其是在人们对 COVID 的德尔塔变异毒株感到担忧的情况下。</blockquote></p><p> “Spending will take a few years to ramp up and will in any case be spread over the rest of the decade,” said Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics, in a recent note.</p><p><blockquote>“凯投宏观（Capital Economics）美国高级经济学家迈克尔-皮尔斯（Michael Pearce）在最近的一份报告中说：”支出需要几年时间才能增加，而且无论如何都将分散到十年的剩余时间里。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What stocks and sectors will benefit from the infrastructure bill?<blockquote>哪些股票和行业将从基础设施法案中受益？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat stocks and sectors will benefit from the infrastructure bill?<blockquote>哪些股票和行业将从基础设施法案中受益？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Market Wacth</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-11 11:14</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What assets are set to score a boost after the U.S. Senate passed a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure package with broad bipartisan support Tuesday, putting it on track to possibly be passed by the House and be signed into law by President Joe Biden?</p><p><blockquote>在美国之后，哪些资产将获得提振。参议院周二在两党广泛支持下通过了一项约1万亿美元的基础设施建设方案，使其有可能在众议院获得通过，并由乔·拜登总统签署成为法律？</blockquote></p><p> Thebill reauthorizes spendingon existing federal public-works programs and pours a fresh $550 billion into water projects, the electrical grid and safety efforts. It includes $110 billion for roads, bridges and other projects, as well as $66 billion for rail, $65 billion for broadband internet and $55 billion for water systems.</p><p><blockquote>该法案重新授权现有联邦公共工程项目的支出，并向供水项目、电网和安全工作注入新的5500亿美元。其中包括1100亿美元用于道路、桥梁和其他项目，以及660亿美元用于铁路、650亿美元用于宽带互联网和550亿美元用于供水系统。</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts say that much of the bill’s positive impact on the economy have already been priced into financial markets but it is possible that a further fillip for stocks could be enjoyed, especially as worries linger about the potential for the delta variant of COVID-19 to stymie aspects of the economic recovery from the deadly pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师说，该法案对经济的大部分积极影响已经被金融市场所消化，但股市有可能进一步受到提振，尤其是在人们仍然担心 COVID-19 德尔塔变异毒株可能会阻碍经济从致命大流行病中复苏的各个方面。</blockquote></p><p> “The passage of the&nbsp;infrastructure&nbsp;bill is a nice headline but unlikely to be a big market mover at this point,” wrote Brian Price, head of investment management at Commonwealth Financial Network in emailed remarks.</p><p><blockquote>“联邦金融网（Commonwealth Financial Network）投资管理主管布莱恩-普莱斯（Brian Price）在电子邮件评论中写道：”基础设施法案的通过是一个不错的头条新闻，但目前不太可能成为一个巨大的市场推动者。</blockquote></p><p> “I think a lot of the enthusiasm has been priced in over the past few weeks and investors are focused on other factors at this point,” he said, perhaps, referring to investors’ current fixation over the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will taper its monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, which had helped to stabilize the market during the height the pandemic back in March and April of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>“他说：”我认为，在过去的几周里，很多人的热情都被消化了，投资者目前正关注其他因素。他说，这或许指的是投资者目前对美联储可能逐步减少每月1200亿美元的国债和抵押贷款支持证券购买量的关注，而这在2020年3月和4月大流行病最严重的时候曾帮助稳定了市场。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the stock market was headed higher on Tuesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.46%and S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%at or near all-time closing highs, after the bill’s passage in the Upper chamber, with a 69-to-30 vote, with 19 Republicans also joining the Democratic yeas, The Wall Street Journal reported.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，周二股市仍走高，道琼斯工业平均指数（Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA）上涨0.46%，标准普尔500SPX上涨0.10%，创下或接近历史收盘高点。据《华尔街日报》报道，该法案在上议院以69票对30票获得通过，19名共和党人也加入了民主党的行列。</blockquote></p><p> A popular exchange-traded fund that offers exposure to stocks that would benefit from an infrastructure bill, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EFFE\">Global X</a> U.S. Infrastructure Development ETFPAVE,+2.19%,was up 2.2% on Tuesday and has climbed 4.7% within the past 30 days, FactSet data show.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d21f2ed025a84fdc2840732cbf4dff62\" tg-width=\"825\" tg-height=\"525\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Pave the way higher?The 'PAVE' ETF has been rising over the past 30 daysGlobal X US Infrastructure Development ETFSource: FactSetAs of Aug. 10, 4 p.m. ETJune 2021Aug.24.525.025.526.026.527.0$27.5</p><p><blockquote>这是一只受欢迎的交易所交易基金，提供受益于基础设施法案的股票敞口<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EFFE\">全球X</a>FactSet 数据显示，美国基础设施发展 ETFPAVE(+2.19%) 周二上涨 2.2%，过去 30 天内上涨 4.7%。铺路更高？“PAVE”ETF 在过去 30 天里一直在上涨Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF 资料来源：FactSetAs 8 月 10 日下午 4 点ET2021年6月Aug.24.525.025.526.026.527.0$27.5</blockquote></p><p> PAVE, referring to the infrastructure ETFs ticker symbol is up 28% so far in 2021, compared with year-to-date gains of around 15% for the S&amp;P 500 and the Dow.</p><p><blockquote>PAVE（指基础设施 ETF 股票代码）在 2021 年迄今已上涨 28%，而标普500和道琼斯指数今年迄今已上涨约 15%。</blockquote></p><p> PAVE holds 100 stocks, from small-cap to large-cap companies, that derive at least 50% of revenue from infrastructure construction, materials and equipment supply and related services in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>PAVE 持有 100 只股票，从小盘股到大盘股公司，这些公司至少 50% 的收入来自美国的基础设施建设、材料和设备供应以及相关服务。</blockquote></p><p> Similarly, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IFRA\">iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF</a>IFRA,+1.45%,another way to play infrastructure, rose 1.3% on Tuesday and is up nearly 22% in the first eight months of the year. The iShares ETF also includes 20 electric utilities and four water utilities, and for that reason isn’t always viewed as a pure-play infrastructure fund.</p><p><blockquote>同样，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IFRA\">iShares 美国基础设施 ETF</a>IFRA 上涨 1.45%，是另一种投资基础设施的方式，周二上涨 1.3%，今年前八个月上涨近 22%。iShares ETF 还包括 20 家电力公司和 4 家水务公司，因此并不总是被视为纯粹的基础设施基金。</blockquote></p><p> The Industrial <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SLCT\">Select</a> Sector SPDR ETFXLI,+1.02%,which tracks the S&amp;P 500’s industrial sector, was up 1% on Tuesday and has gained nearly 18% in the year so far.</p><p><blockquote>工业<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SLCT\">选择</a>跟踪标普500工业部门的 SPDR ETFXLI,+1.02%，周二上涨 1%，今年迄今已上涨近 18%。</blockquote></p><p> Back in the spring MarketWatch’s Philip van Doorn wrote that there are about 20 companies that are included in PAVE that might have the most upsidepotential for investors. Those include <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TISI\">Team</a> Inc., which was up 4.4% on Tuesday but has declined 56% in the year to date and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PRIM\">Primoris</a>, which was up 2.9% on the day but down 3.6% so far this year.</p><p><blockquote>早在春季，MarketWatch 的菲利普-范-多恩（Philip van Doorn）就写道，PAVE 中大约有 20 家公司可能对投资者来说最具上涨潜力。其中包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TISI\">团队</a>周二上涨 4.4%，但今年迄今已下跌 56%<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PRIM\">滨海</a>当天上涨 2.9%，但今年迄今已下跌 3.6%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <table>  <tbody>   <tr>    <td><b>Company names</b></td>    <td><b>YTD % return</b></td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Team Inc.TISI,+4.37%</td>    <td>-56.83</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Primoris Services Corp.PRIM,+2.90%</td>    <td>-3.6%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMCO\">Columbus McKinnon</a> Corp.CMCO,+2.03%</td>    <td>17.6%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLDR\">Builders FirstSource</a> Inc.BLDR,+2.72%</td>    <td>19.6%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMS\">Advanced Drainage</a> Systems Inc.WMS,+1.89%</td>    <td>40%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AIMCV\">Altra Industrial Motion Corp.</a>AIMC,+3.15%</td>    <td>10.5%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DY\">Dycom</a> IndustriesDY,-0.96%</td>    <td>-5.7%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td>Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.CLF,+5.05%</td>    <td>78.7%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RXN\">Rexnord</a> Corp.RXN,+1.91%</td>    <td>51%</td>   </tr>   <tr>    <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HRI\">Herc</a> Holdings Inc.HRI,+2.28%</td>    <td>90%</td>   </tr>  </tbody> </table> Overall, the investment in infrastructure is the biggest investment in roads, bridges and tunnels and other areas of America’s inner workings in a generation.</p><p><blockquote><table><tbody><tr><td><b>公司名称</b></td><td><b>年初至今百分比回报率</b></td></tr><tr><td>Team Inc.TISI,+4.37%</td><td>-56.83</td></tr><tr><td>Primoris Services Corp.PRIM,+2.90%</td><td>-3.6%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMCO\">哥伦布·麦金农</a>CMCO公司，+2.03%</td><td>17.6%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLDR\">建筑商第一来源</a>公司BLDR，+2.72%</td><td>19.6%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMS\">高级引流</a>Systems Inc.WMS,+1.89%</td><td>40%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AIMCV\">阿尔特拉工业运动公司。</a>AIMC，+3.15%</td><td>10.5%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DY\">戴康</a>工业日，-0.96%</td><td>-5.7%</td></tr><tr><td>克利夫兰悬崖公司 CLF,+5.05%</td><td>78.7%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RXN\">雷克斯诺德</a>RXN公司，+1.91%</td><td>51%</td></tr><tr><td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HRI\">赫克</a>控股公司HRI,+2.28%</td><td>90%</td></tr></tbody></table>总体而言，基础设施投资是一代人以来对道路、桥梁、隧道和美国内部运作其他领域最大的投资。</blockquote></p><p> Edward Moya, analyst at Oanda, said that the infrastructure package, should it get quickly passed by the House, is very constructive in “driving the cyclical trade,” particularly as there have been concerns about the delta variant of COVID.</p><p><blockquote>Oanda 分析师 Edward Moya 说，基础设施一揽子计划如果能在众议院迅速获得通过，将对 “推动周期性贸易 ”非常有建设性，尤其是在人们对 COVID 的德尔塔变异毒株感到担忧的情况下。</blockquote></p><p> “Spending will take a few years to ramp up and will in any case be spread over the rest of the decade,” said Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics, in a recent note.</p><p><blockquote>“凯投宏观（Capital Economics）美国高级经济学家迈克尔-皮尔斯（Michael Pearce）在最近的一份报告中说：”支出需要几年时间才能增加，而且无论如何都将分散到十年的剩余时间里。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/what-stocks-and-sectors-will-benefit-from-the-infrastructure-bill-11628628331?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CMCO":"哥伦布-麦金农","BLDR":"Builders FirstSource","WMS":"Advanced Drainage","TISI":"Team Inc","DY":"戴康工业","PRIM":"Primoris Services Corporation","IFRA":"iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF","HRI":"Herc Holdings Inc.","XLI":"工业指数ETF-SPDR","CLF":"克利夫兰克里夫"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/what-stocks-and-sectors-will-benefit-from-the-infrastructure-bill-11628628331?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147144306","content_text":"What assets are set to score a boost after the U.S. Senate passed a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure package with broad bipartisan support Tuesday, putting it on track to possibly be passed by the House and be signed into law by President Joe Biden?\nThebill reauthorizes spendingon existing federal public-works programs and pours a fresh $550 billion into water projects, the electrical grid and safety efforts. It includes $110 billion for roads, bridges and other projects, as well as $66 billion for rail, $65 billion for broadband internet and $55 billion for water systems.\nSome analysts say that much of the bill’s positive impact on the economy have already been priced into financial markets but it is possible that a further fillip for stocks could be enjoyed, especially as worries linger about the potential for the delta variant of COVID-19 to stymie aspects of the economic recovery from the deadly pandemic.\n“The passage of the infrastructure bill is a nice headline but unlikely to be a big market mover at this point,” wrote Brian Price, head of investment management at Commonwealth Financial Network in emailed remarks.\n“I think a lot of the enthusiasm has been priced in over the past few weeks and investors are focused on other factors at this point,” he said, perhaps, referring to investors’ current fixation over the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will taper its monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, which had helped to stabilize the market during the height the pandemic back in March and April of 2020.\nStill, the stock market was headed higher on Tuesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.46%and S&P 500SPX,+0.10%at or near all-time closing highs, after the bill’s passage in the Upper chamber, with a 69-to-30 vote, with 19 Republicans also joining the Democratic yeas, The Wall Street Journal reported.\nA popular exchange-traded fund that offers exposure to stocks that would benefit from an infrastructure bill, the Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETFPAVE,+2.19%,was up 2.2% on Tuesday and has climbed 4.7% within the past 30 days, FactSet data show.Pave the way higher?The 'PAVE' ETF has been rising over the past 30 daysGlobal X US Infrastructure Development ETFSource: FactSetAs of Aug. 10, 4 p.m. ETJune 2021Aug.24.525.025.526.026.527.0$27.5\nPAVE, referring to the infrastructure ETFs ticker symbol is up 28% so far in 2021, compared with year-to-date gains of around 15% for the S&P 500 and the Dow.\nPAVE holds 100 stocks, from small-cap to large-cap companies, that derive at least 50% of revenue from infrastructure construction, materials and equipment supply and related services in the U.S.\nSimilarly, the iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETFIFRA,+1.45%,another way to play infrastructure, rose 1.3% on Tuesday and is up nearly 22% in the first eight months of the year. The iShares ETF also includes 20 electric utilities and four water utilities, and for that reason isn’t always viewed as a pure-play infrastructure fund.\nThe Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETFXLI,+1.02%,which tracks the S&P 500’s industrial sector, was up 1% on Tuesday and has gained nearly 18% in the year so far.\nBack in the spring MarketWatch’s Philip van Doorn wrote that there are about 20 companies that are included in PAVE that might have the most upsidepotential for investors. Those include Team Inc., which was up 4.4% on Tuesday but has declined 56% in the year to date and Primoris, which was up 2.9% on the day but down 3.6% so far this year.\n\n\n\nCompany names\nYTD % return\n\n\nTeam Inc.TISI,+4.37%\n-56.83\n\n\nPrimoris Services Corp.PRIM,+2.90%\n-3.6%\n\n\nColumbus McKinnon Corp.CMCO,+2.03%\n17.6%\n\n\nBuilders FirstSource Inc.BLDR,+2.72%\n19.6%\n\n\nAdvanced Drainage Systems Inc.WMS,+1.89%\n40%\n\n\nAltra Industrial Motion Corp.AIMC,+3.15%\n10.5%\n\n\nDycom IndustriesDY,-0.96%\n-5.7%\n\n\nCleveland-Cliffs Inc.CLF,+5.05%\n78.7%\n\n\nRexnord Corp.RXN,+1.91%\n51%\n\n\nHerc Holdings Inc.HRI,+2.28%\n90%\n\n\n\nOverall, the investment in infrastructure is the biggest investment in roads, bridges and tunnels and other areas of America’s inner workings in a generation.\nEdward Moya, analyst at Oanda, said that the infrastructure package, should it get quickly passed by the House, is very constructive in “driving the cyclical trade,” particularly as there have been concerns about the delta variant of COVID.\n“Spending will take a few years to ramp up and will in any case be spread over the rest of the decade,” said Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics, in a recent note.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CLF":0.9,"RXN":0.9,"CMCO":0.9,"PRIM":0.9,"DY":0.9,"BLDR":0.9,"TISI":0.9,"XLI":0.9,"AIMC":0.9,"IFRA":0.9,"HRI":0.9,"WMS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":969,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896382059,"gmtCreate":1628556736271,"gmtModify":1631891882395,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nic","listText":"Nic","text":"Nic","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896382059","repostId":"1196813173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1028,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891388224,"gmtCreate":1628334662168,"gmtModify":1631891882397,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891388224","repostId":"1180025090","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":909,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899761236,"gmtCreate":1628215796625,"gmtModify":1631891882400,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ow","listText":"Ow","text":"Ow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899761236","repostId":"1127190719","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1060,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890494454,"gmtCreate":1628127297378,"gmtModify":1631891882404,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890494454","repostId":"1186975125","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":650,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807559142,"gmtCreate":1628045012386,"gmtModify":1631891882416,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807559142","repostId":"1175010735","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":844,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802192082,"gmtCreate":1627728729646,"gmtModify":1631891882416,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"No","listText":"No","text":"No","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802192082","repostId":"1154216466","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154216466","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627713678,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1154216466?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 14:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First<blockquote>反垄断活动家想要全力以赴。这是他们应该首先考虑的一个教训</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154216466","media":"Barron's","summary":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson Unive","content":"<p><i>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission.&nbsp;His latest book is</i>The Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.</p><p><blockquote><i>关于作者：托马斯·W·黑兹利特是H.H。麦考利是克莱姆森大学经济学捐赠教授，曾担任联邦通信委员会首席经济学家。他的最新著作是</i>政治光谱：无线技术的动荡解放，从赫伯特·胡佛到智能手机。</blockquote></p><p> Big Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&amp;T-Time Warner merger.</p><p><blockquote>大型科技公司正处于反垄断的风口浪尖。但在司法部试图拆分谷歌或苹果等公司之前，它应该回顾一下 T&amp;T 与时代华纳合并的历史和最终结果。</blockquote></p><p> The DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&amp;T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.</p><p><blockquote>司法部花费了大量时间和资源阻止 AT&amp;T 收购时代华纳，这标志着司法部 40 多年来首次挑战重大垂直合并。尽管政府尽了最大努力，包括向华盛顿巡回法院提出上诉，但还是没有成功，时间表明，它的担忧显然一直是错误的。合并没有导致价格上涨、项目中断，甚至没有给公司带来任何明显的优势。</blockquote></p><p> In October 2016 AT&amp;Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.&nbsp; Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement: &nbsp;“AT&amp;T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”&nbsp; With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.</p><p><blockquote>2016 年 10 月，美国电话电报公司宣布计划收购时代华纳。唐纳德-特朗普的总统竞选团队在一份声明中否决了这一合并： “美国电话电报公司.现在正试图收购时代华纳，从而收购狂热反特朗普的 CNN。唐纳德-特朗普绝不会批准这样的交易”。特朗普上任后，司法部采取行动阻止了这一交易。</blockquote></p><p> In 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&amp;T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&amp;T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&amp;T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.</p><p><blockquote>2017 年，司法部向法院投诉称，合并将允许 AT&amp;T “利用时代华纳的 '必备 '网络，如 CNN、TNT、TBS 和 HBO，提高向康卡斯特或 DISH 等竞争对手有线电视分销商收取的费用，从而 “大大减少视频领域的竞争”。收购了国家卫星运营商 DirecTV 的 AT&amp;T 可能会威胁 “停电 ”，剥夺竞争对手分销商的关键节目--他们的用户随后会退出并涌向 DirecTV（AT&amp;T），以便继续在 TNT 上观看 CNN 或 NBA 季后赛。不仅主要的电视和有线电视系统会受到损害，新兴的在线流媒体服务也会受到挤压。</blockquote></p><p> The government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets.&nbsp;Here, AT&amp;T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt.&nbsp;Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality.&nbsp;So facts, not just a story, are needed.&nbsp; District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”</p><p><blockquote>政府的案例集中在 “垂直杠杆”上，即一家公司使用两种互补的产品，使竞争对手更难在各自的市场上竞争。在这种情况下，AT&amp;T 将视频内容创作与视频节目发行相结合；指控称，这两个领域的竞争对手都可能受到伤害。然而，正如在对垂直一体化公司的研究中广泛发现的那样，联合运营提高了消费者的幸福感，这显然会带来效率。好市多（Costco）的买家急于snap好市多（Costco）供应的柯克兰（Kirkland）产品，如果这些产品能提高价格或质量，零售商就会囤积柯克兰（Kirkland）产品。因此，我们需要的是事实，而不仅仅是一个故事。地区法院法官 Richard J. Leon 认为，司法部的案件 “远不能证明其.理论的有效性”。</blockquote></p><p> Aside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years.&nbsp;Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”</p><p><blockquote>除了此案的政治色彩之外，还有充分的历史理由怀疑官方的投诉。一家有线电视节目主持人近年来多次与一家视频发行商合并（或分拆）。计量经济学分析表明，垂直整合并没有导致更高的价格。正如司法部承认的那样，垂直整合也不会导致 “停电”。华盛顿特区巡回法院的三名法官组成的合议庭确认了莱昂法官的意见，认为 “近年来，随着 Netflix 和 Hulu 等公司的出现，该行业变得充满活力”。</blockquote></p><p> Owning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&amp;T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&amp;T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion.&nbsp;In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>事实证明，共同拥有 DirecTV 和时代华纳并没有多大优势，更不用说垄断了。尽管大流行病对视频内容的需求大大增加，但竞争对手很快就吃了 AT&amp;T-时代华纳的午餐。AT&amp;T 在 2015 年收购 DirecTV 时支付了 670 亿美元。2021 年 2 月，随着 DirecTV 的卫星用户群崩溃，分拆业务的估值为 163 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And AT&amp;Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&amp;T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&amp;T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.</p><p><blockquote>美国电话电报公司随后卸载了时代华纳的视频资产。一家新企业——华纳兄弟探索频道——正在分拆并与探索频道（探索频道、动物星球、TLC、HGTV、食品网络等）合并。这家只做内容的公司自愿切断了DOJ批评为容易垄断金钱的链接。由于反竞争捆绑的指控，它已被放弃，因为不值得麻烦。 AT&amp;T 股东获得 430 亿美元，不到三年前 AT&amp;T 为时代华纳花费的 1000 亿美元（债务和股权）的一半。政府提出的反竞争垂直一体化方案被证明是一种幻想。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> AT&amp;T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&amp;T so spectacularly failed to do in video.&nbsp; Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.</p><p><blockquote>AT&amp;T 的举动值得数十亿股东损失所带来的蔑视。愤世嫉俗者可能会建议加强反垄断法，以防止此类公司错误，而忽略了经济处罚——比反垄断执法者可能处理的任何事情都更可靠、更严厉——显然已经到位。但是很少有人注意到这个具有讽刺意味的政治传奇。政策制定者们正在全力制定法规，以加强对科技领域的反垄断起诉，而美国电话电报公司（AT&amp;T）在视频中却未能做到这一点。众议员普拉米拉-贾亚帕尔（Pramila Jayapal，民主党-华盛顿州）和众议员兰斯-古登（Lance Gooden，共和党-德克萨斯州）提出了 “终止垄断平台法案”，该法案将限制在线服务的垂直合并。至少还有五项新的反垄断规则法案已经出台。</blockquote></p><p> Not only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast).&nbsp;Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&amp;T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success. </p><p><blockquote>此类政策不仅可能是昂贵的法律转移，还会阻碍为客户点燃令人兴奋的新选择的创新。在推出Roku后，Netflix 已将流媒体整合到电影制作中。Hulu 由新闻集团（Fox）和 NBC-Universal（Comcast）创建。亚马逊 Prime Video、Sling、YouTube TV、苹果电视台、Disney Plus、HBO Max 和派拉蒙 Plus——每个都扩展了大型媒体或电子商务平台。每一个都是从对更好产品的追求演变而来的。将创业视为嫌疑人只会加剧目前扰乱在线娱乐市场的混乱。美国电话电报公司惨痛地认识到，拥有互补产品并不能保证成功。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First<blockquote>反垄断活动家想要全力以赴。这是他们应该首先考虑的一个教训</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAntitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First<blockquote>反垄断活动家想要全力以赴。这是他们应该首先考虑的一个教训</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barron's</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 14:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><i>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission.&nbsp;His latest book is</i>The Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.</p><p><blockquote><i>关于作者：托马斯·W·黑兹利特是H.H。麦考利是克莱姆森大学经济学捐赠教授，曾担任联邦通信委员会首席经济学家。他的最新著作是</i>政治光谱：无线技术的动荡解放，从赫伯特·胡佛到智能手机。</blockquote></p><p> Big Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&amp;T-Time Warner merger.</p><p><blockquote>大型科技公司正处于反垄断的风口浪尖。但在司法部试图拆分谷歌或苹果等公司之前，它应该回顾一下 T&amp;T 与时代华纳合并的历史和最终结果。</blockquote></p><p> The DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&amp;T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.</p><p><blockquote>司法部花费了大量时间和资源阻止 AT&amp;T 收购时代华纳，这标志着司法部 40 多年来首次挑战重大垂直合并。尽管政府尽了最大努力，包括向华盛顿巡回法院提出上诉，但还是没有成功，时间表明，它的担忧显然一直是错误的。合并没有导致价格上涨、项目中断，甚至没有给公司带来任何明显的优势。</blockquote></p><p> In October 2016 AT&amp;Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.&nbsp; Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement: &nbsp;“AT&amp;T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”&nbsp; With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.</p><p><blockquote>2016 年 10 月，美国电话电报公司宣布计划收购时代华纳。唐纳德-特朗普的总统竞选团队在一份声明中否决了这一合并： “美国电话电报公司.现在正试图收购时代华纳，从而收购狂热反特朗普的 CNN。唐纳德-特朗普绝不会批准这样的交易”。特朗普上任后，司法部采取行动阻止了这一交易。</blockquote></p><p> In 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&amp;T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&amp;T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&amp;T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.</p><p><blockquote>2017 年，司法部向法院投诉称，合并将允许 AT&amp;T “利用时代华纳的 '必备 '网络，如 CNN、TNT、TBS 和 HBO，提高向康卡斯特或 DISH 等竞争对手有线电视分销商收取的费用，从而 “大大减少视频领域的竞争”。收购了国家卫星运营商 DirecTV 的 AT&amp;T 可能会威胁 “停电 ”，剥夺竞争对手分销商的关键节目--他们的用户随后会退出并涌向 DirecTV（AT&amp;T），以便继续在 TNT 上观看 CNN 或 NBA 季后赛。不仅主要的电视和有线电视系统会受到损害，新兴的在线流媒体服务也会受到挤压。</blockquote></p><p> The government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets.&nbsp;Here, AT&amp;T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt.&nbsp;Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality.&nbsp;So facts, not just a story, are needed.&nbsp; District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”</p><p><blockquote>政府的案例集中在 “垂直杠杆”上，即一家公司使用两种互补的产品，使竞争对手更难在各自的市场上竞争。在这种情况下，AT&amp;T 将视频内容创作与视频节目发行相结合；指控称，这两个领域的竞争对手都可能受到伤害。然而，正如在对垂直一体化公司的研究中广泛发现的那样，联合运营提高了消费者的幸福感，这显然会带来效率。好市多（Costco）的买家急于snap好市多（Costco）供应的柯克兰（Kirkland）产品，如果这些产品能提高价格或质量，零售商就会囤积柯克兰（Kirkland）产品。因此，我们需要的是事实，而不仅仅是一个故事。地区法院法官 Richard J. Leon 认为，司法部的案件 “远不能证明其.理论的有效性”。</blockquote></p><p> Aside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years.&nbsp;Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”</p><p><blockquote>除了此案的政治色彩之外，还有充分的历史理由怀疑官方的投诉。一家有线电视节目主持人近年来多次与一家视频发行商合并（或分拆）。计量经济学分析表明，垂直整合并没有导致更高的价格。正如司法部承认的那样，垂直整合也不会导致 “停电”。华盛顿特区巡回法院的三名法官组成的合议庭确认了莱昂法官的意见，认为 “近年来，随着 Netflix 和 Hulu 等公司的出现，该行业变得充满活力”。</blockquote></p><p> Owning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&amp;T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&amp;T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion.&nbsp;In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>事实证明，共同拥有 DirecTV 和时代华纳并没有多大优势，更不用说垄断了。尽管大流行病对视频内容的需求大大增加，但竞争对手很快就吃了 AT&amp;T-时代华纳的午餐。AT&amp;T 在 2015 年收购 DirecTV 时支付了 670 亿美元。2021 年 2 月，随着 DirecTV 的卫星用户群崩溃，分拆业务的估值为 163 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And AT&amp;Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&amp;T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&amp;T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.</p><p><blockquote>美国电话电报公司随后卸载了时代华纳的视频资产。一家新企业——华纳兄弟探索频道——正在分拆并与探索频道（探索频道、动物星球、TLC、HGTV、食品网络等）合并。这家只做内容的公司自愿切断了DOJ批评为容易垄断金钱的链接。由于反竞争捆绑的指控，它已被放弃，因为不值得麻烦。 AT&amp;T 股东获得 430 亿美元，不到三年前 AT&amp;T 为时代华纳花费的 1000 亿美元（债务和股权）的一半。政府提出的反竞争垂直一体化方案被证明是一种幻想。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> AT&amp;T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&amp;T so spectacularly failed to do in video.&nbsp; Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.</p><p><blockquote>AT&amp;T 的举动值得数十亿股东损失所带来的蔑视。愤世嫉俗者可能会建议加强反垄断法，以防止此类公司错误，而忽略了经济处罚——比反垄断执法者可能处理的任何事情都更可靠、更严厉——显然已经到位。但是很少有人注意到这个具有讽刺意味的政治传奇。政策制定者们正在全力制定法规，以加强对科技领域的反垄断起诉，而美国电话电报公司（AT&amp;T）在视频中却未能做到这一点。众议员普拉米拉-贾亚帕尔（Pramila Jayapal，民主党-华盛顿州）和众议员兰斯-古登（Lance Gooden，共和党-德克萨斯州）提出了 “终止垄断平台法案”，该法案将限制在线服务的垂直合并。至少还有五项新的反垄断规则法案已经出台。</blockquote></p><p> Not only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast).&nbsp;Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&amp;T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success. </p><p><blockquote>此类政策不仅可能是昂贵的法律转移，还会阻碍为客户点燃令人兴奋的新选择的创新。在推出Roku后，Netflix 已将流媒体整合到电影制作中。Hulu 由新闻集团（Fox）和 NBC-Universal（Comcast）创建。亚马逊 Prime Video、Sling、YouTube TV、苹果电视台、Disney Plus、HBO Max 和派拉蒙 Plus——每个都扩展了大型媒体或电子商务平台。每一个都是从对更好产品的追求演变而来的。将创业视为嫌疑人只会加剧目前扰乱在线娱乐市场的混乱。美国电话电报公司惨痛地认识到，拥有互补产品并不能保证成功。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3\">Barron's</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154216466","content_text":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission. His latest book isThe Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.\nBig Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&T-Time Warner merger.\nThe DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.\nIn October 2016 AT&Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.  Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement:  “AT&T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”  With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.\nIn 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.\nThe government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets. Here, AT&T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt. Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality. So facts, not just a story, are needed.  District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”\nAside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years. Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”\nOwning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion. In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.\nAnd AT&Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.\nAT&T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&T so spectacularly failed to do in video.  Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.\nNot only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast). Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":872,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":830552815,"gmtCreate":1629083741037,"gmtModify":1631891882380,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ouo","listText":"Ouo","text":"Ouo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830552815","repostId":"2159246152","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":778,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140526954,"gmtCreate":1625666669278,"gmtModify":1633938556623,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Lies","listText":"Lies","text":"Lies","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140526954","repostId":"2149160390","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":842,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":881582311,"gmtCreate":1631363889133,"gmtModify":1631889730891,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"&nbsp;Mmm","listText":"&nbsp;Mmm","text":"Mmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/881582311","repostId":"2166372458","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2567,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148557252,"gmtCreate":1625993616476,"gmtModify":1633931025252,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Memes","listText":"Memes","text":"Memes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148557252","repostId":"1112201050","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112201050","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625966101,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1112201050?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-11 09:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112201050","media":"Barrons","summary":"It seemed to be only a matter of time.\nWhen GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the de","content":"<p>It seemed to be only a matter of time.</p><p><blockquote>这似乎只是时间问题。</blockquote></p><p> When GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?</p><p><blockquote>当游戏驿站（股票代码：GME）、黑莓（BB），甚至百视达的干涸尸体在一月份突然复活时，它们何时会再次坠毁的时间已经在流逝。会是几个小时、几天还是几周？</blockquote></p><p> It has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like&nbsp;Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and&nbsp;Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.</p><p><blockquote>现在已经过去半年了，核心 “备忘录股票 ”的交易价格仍然处于研究这些股票多年的人认为离谱的水平。Clover Health Investments (CLOV) 和 Newegg Commerce (NEGG) 等新名称最近出现在留言板上，它们的股票也随之上涨。</blockquote></p><p> The collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.</p><p><blockquote>数百万散户交易员--长期以来被嘲笑为 “哑巴钱 ”--的集体努力成功地让股市飙升，并迫使反对者投降。</blockquote></p><p> That is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.</p><p><blockquote>尽管他们押注的公司几乎没有表现出业务转型的迹象，也没有表现出足以证明其估值的利润，但情况确实如此。黑莓在最近一个季度烧钱，并警告称其关键的网络安全部门将达到收入指导的低端；消息传出后，该股下跌，但在过去一年中仍上涨了一倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in&nbsp;AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than&nbsp;Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大型经纪商的交易量较 2 月份的峰值略有下降，但仍高于疫情爆发前的两到三倍。数量惊人的这种活动发生在散户交易者青睐的股票中。例如，AMC院线控股公司（AMC）6 月份的日均交易额达到 131 亿美元，超过了苹果（AAPL）的 95 亿美元和亚马逊（AMZN）的 103 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.</p><p><blockquote>即使冠状病毒在美国消退，大多数新交易者表示，他们仍然致力于他们在封锁期间学到的爱好——在一项Betterment调查中，58%的日内交易者表示，他们计划在未来进行更多的交易，只有12%的人计划减少交易。业余疫情面包师已经停止揉捏酸面团面包；交易者只会变得越来越饥饿。</blockquote></p><p> A sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.</p><p><blockquote>持续的熊市会破坏这种食欲，就像互联网泡沫破裂时一样。目前，下跌是持有或买入的理由。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25a79e71371c165f9a3a5085931fc487\" tg-width=\"979\" tg-height=\"649\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to&nbsp;Barron’s.</p><p><blockquote>“美国海军电子技术员布兰登-卢切克（Brandon Luczek）在给《巴伦周刊》的一封电子邮件中写道：”我看到'逢低买入'的情绪一刻也没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> The meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票飙升是由散户投资者交易的增加推动的。2020年，在线经纪商以创纪录的速度签约客户，超过1000万人开设了新账户。这一记录几乎肯定会在2021年被打破。一些顶级公司透露，在今年不到一半的时间里，经纪商已经增加了超过 1000 万个账户。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent&nbsp;Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.</p><p><blockquote>模因股票既是这种现象的推车，也是马。他们的价格突然飙升是由新投资者推动的，然后这一行动推动更多的新人投资。数百万人在 1 月底和 2 月初下载了投资应用程序，只是为了享受乐趣。嘉信理财（SCHW）最近的一项调查发现，15%的现有交易者在2020年后开始投资。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/167386c6881a258922ad62caaf7a05f4\" tg-width=\"971\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e29e3041b91070252ab9063d1a11fa2\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"642\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9cc1c0bd6368721c0eca87e25719f16\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"641\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.</p><p><blockquote>激增中最突出的参与者是 Robinhood，该公司表示仅在第一季度就增加了 550 万个资金账户。但它并不孤单。例如，富达宣布，第一季度吸引了 160 万 35 岁以下的新客户，比去年同期增长了 223%。</blockquote></p><p> Under pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>在 Robinhood 零佣金模式的压力下，所有主要经纪商都在 2019 年将佣金降至零。这为新客户群体打开了闸门——他们可能没有那么多闲置现金进行交易，但比前辈更加活跃和多样化。经纪人正在套现。富达希望在投资者获得驾照之前就吸引他们，允许年仅 13 岁的儿童开设交易账户。Robinhood 正在乘势而上进行首次公开募股，分析师预计其估值将超过其收入的 10 倍。</blockquote></p><p> These new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”</p><p><blockquote>这些新客户的行为与他们的老同行不同。E*Trade 交易主管克里斯-拉金（Chris Larkin）说，多年来，“ETF 一直备受青睐”，E*Trade 现归摩根士丹利（MS）所有。但挑选个股显然是 “2021 年的大新闻”。</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是，随着世界各地的投资者押注疫情复苏并避免疲软的债券收益率，股票交易所交易基金仍然表现良好。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.</p><p><blockquote>但 ETF 不像股票那样点亮留言板。这并不是说顶级公司的单行道。游戏驿站二月份确实下跌，华尔街享受了幸灾乐祸的时刻。它并没有持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> “Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.</p><p><blockquote>“盈透证券（Interactive Brokers）首席策略师史蒂夫-索斯尼克（Steve Sosnick）写道：”就像蝉一样，备忘录交易者在表面上隐匿了几个月后又重新活跃起来。索斯尼克认为，模因股票的交易往往与加密货币相反，因为随着势头的变化，它们的粉丝会从一种货币转向另一种货币。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道：”我不认为，在比特币和其他加密货币大幅回调后，备忘录股票卷土重来完全是巧合。</blockquote></p><p> Sosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.</p><p><blockquote>索斯尼克认为备忘录股票是一个 “独立的板块”，他在电脑显示器上将其与其他股票代码分开。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，华尔街对备忘录股票革命的反应一直是孤立专业人士认为不理性的市场部分。大多数卖空者不会碰这些股票，分析师也在放弃报道。</blockquote></p><p> But Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.</p><p><blockquote>但华尔街不能像蝉一样把零售大军赶走，也不能指望它们在未来 17 年内消失。股票交易已经发生了永久性的变化。今年，零售活动占股本量的 24%，高于 2019 年的 15%。新信条的追随者不是愿意让华尔街管理市场的被动观察者。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/710e642d3b685b74f8c9dcaf46ef3e0b\" tg-width=\"968\" tg-height=\"643\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”</p><p><blockquote>“哥伦比亚法学院（Columbia Law School）专门研究证券市场的教授约书亚-米茨（Joshua Mitts）说：”这实际上反映了我们所看到的趋势的逆转，即与个别公司的接触越来越少。“技术正在拉近普通投资者与他或她所投资的公司的距离，而这只是以新的、不可预测的形式出现。”</blockquote></p><p> The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.</p><p><blockquote>你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> — Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube</p><p><blockquote>— Matt Kohrs，26 岁，每天在 YouTube 上直播股票分析</blockquote></p><p> It is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.</p><p><blockquote>它现在正在改变那些早早加入的人的生活，并且仍然在更高的名字上。</blockquote></p><p> Take Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming&nbsp;stock analysis on YouTube&nbsp;for seven hours a day.</p><p><blockquote>以马特·科尔斯为例，他很早就投资了AMC院线。今年2月，他辞去了纽约程序员的工作，搬到了费城，并开始在YouTube上每天7个小时直播股票分析。</blockquote></p><p> With 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.</p><p><blockquote>YouTube 拥有 35 万粉丝，它正在支付账单。科尔斯说，凭借广告和股票的收入，他可以拿到与以前大致相同的工资。但他也知道，像这样依赖股票收益与朝九晚五的工作完全不同。</blockquote></p><p> “The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>“他说：”你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> Companies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.</p><p><blockquote>公司也开始做出更积极的反应。他们要么拥抱他们的新主人，要么付钱给迷因学家来理解新华尔街充满表情符号的语言，这样他们就可以阻止他们或安抚他们。</blockquote></p><p> AMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 甚至在上周取消了一项拟议的股权融资，因为该公司显然不喜欢 Reddit 人群的反响。过去一年，AMC 的股票数量已经增加了五倍。首席执行官亚当-阿伦（Adam Aron）在推特上表示，他看到了 “许多人赞成，许多人反对 ”对他增发 2500 万股股票的提议的反应，因此该提议将被取消，而不是在本月晚些时候的 AMC 年会上进行表决。该公司没有回答有关如何调查股东的问题。</blockquote></p><p> Forget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.</p><p><blockquote>忘了会议室吧。公司政策现在正在聊天室里决定。</blockquote></p><p> Big investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.</p><p><blockquote>大投资者正在花费更多时间跟踪社交媒体上有关股票的讨论。美国银行在今年的一项调查中发现，大约25%的机构已经在跟踪社交媒体情绪，但大约40%的机构有兴趣在未来使用它。</blockquote></p><p> In the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几个月里，美国银行、摩根士丹利和摩根大通都发布了关于如何围绕零售行动进行交易的报告，得出了有些不同的结论。</blockquote></p><p> There can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.</p><p><blockquote>正如摩根士丹利所说，信号中可能存在 “阿尔法”，但要实现这一目标可能需要一些紧张的数字运算。当然，并不是所有的留言板聊天都会导致价格持续上涨，如果没有大量的数据分析，零售订单流很难与机构流分开。对于拥有工具来确定散户投资者正在购买哪些股票和正在出售哪些股票的投资者来说，摩根大通建议做多买入兴趣最高的 20% 的股票，做空卖出兴趣最高的 20% 的股票。</blockquote></p><p> For now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>提供跟踪社交媒体情绪产品的另类数据公司Thinknum的鲍里斯·斯皮瓦克(Boris Spiwak)表示，目前，许多购买社交媒体情绪数据的机构似乎都在试图降低风险，而不是寻找新的机会。“他说：”他们认为这几乎就像一份保险，以限制他们的下行风险。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.</p><p><blockquote>对于零售商来说，这种方法并不总是科学的。这一行动是由社区精神支撑的。其背后的力量既是情感上的，也是道德上的，也是经济上的。</blockquote></p><p> New investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>新投资者表示，他们的动机是希望证明自己，并像利润一样惩罚保守派。他们互相学习市场，有时会放大或揭穿关于华尔街的阴谋论。一些人将模因股票运动与2008年金融危机引发的对大型金融机构的持续不信任联系起来。</blockquote></p><p> “Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”</p><p><blockquote>“26 岁的科尔斯说：”华尔街让我们的经济陷入困境，但没有人因此惹上麻烦。“所以，我认为他们认为我们不仅可以赚钱，还可以让华尔街的这些对冲基金付钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Claire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”</p><p><blockquote>克莱尔·赫希伯格 (Claire Hirschberg) 是一名 28 岁的工会组织者，她在 1 月份从朋友那里听说 Robinhood 上购买了价值约 50 美元的游戏驿站股票。她喜欢这个想法，但真正让她兴奋的是她父亲的反应，他是一名长期的资金经理。“她笑着说：”他很生气我买了游戏驿站，还不肯卖。“这让我想永远拿着它。”</blockquote></p><p> Just like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.</p><p><blockquote>就像老华尔街有仪式和准则一样，新华尔街也有。一位新的投资银行员工很快就会知道，在你成为合伙人之前，你不会打菲拉格慕领带。在总经理离开之前，你从不离开办公室，你也不会抱怨工作时间。坏人是监管者和参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦，而且不是按顺序。</blockquote></p><p> The new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.</p><p><blockquote>新的交易台——数百万散户交易者现在使用的应用程序和他们聚集的留言板——也有潜规则。公开承认财务损失是一种勇敢的行为，是内部坚韧和对本集团信念的证明。你不把自己当回事，也不规范语言。你是 “猿类 ”或 “弱智 ”大军的一员。你坚持住，即使这意味着你可能会失去一切。坏人依次是卖空者、做市商和华尔街精英。</blockquote></p><p> The group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>集体行动不仅仅是为了精神支持。交易策略取决于人们保持买入压力，迫使做空，或买入看涨期权，从而引发所谓的伽马挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75d79c78a14cc8f297e17397cc54bdb5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Keith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>基思·吉尔 (Keith Gill) 在二月份众议院金融服务委员会听证会上虚拟露面，成为 Reddit 散户交易员大军推高游戏驿站股价的代言人。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Many short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.</p><p><blockquote>许多卖空者表示，他们不会再碰这些股票了。但显然，其他人并没有采纳这一建议，而是通过反复做空股票来给备忘录运动注入氧气。6 月中旬，AMC 的空头权益占该股流通量的 17%，低于 1 月份的 28%，但降幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> As the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”</p><p><blockquote>随着价格上涨，空头们也控制不住自己。多年来一直关注游戏驿站的韦德布什证券分析师迈克尔-帕切特（Michael Pachter）说，他们开始 “流口水，耳朵里冒出火焰”。“他说：”让我感到震惊的是精神错乱的定义，就是一遍又一遍地做同样的事情，每次都希望有不同的结果，而空头却不断出现。“[游戏驿站公牛]基思-吉尔（Keith Gill）和他的 Reddit raiders 一直在挤压他们，而且一直在起作用。”</blockquote></p><p> To beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath &amp; Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.</p><p><blockquote>为了击败卖空者，Reddit 人群需要团结起来，但该社区有时会出现裂缝。拥有最坚定粉丝群的两只模因股票——游戏驿站和 AMC——仍然拥有庞大的核心信徒大军，他们似乎不容易动摇。但其他名字似乎有更善变的支持者。几只陷入迷因疯狂的股票已经崩溃。 Bed Bath &amp; Beyond (BBBY) 在 1 月底和 6 月初两次飙升，但现在的交易价格仅略高于 1 月中旬的水平。在上涨期间买入的人已经赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Distrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.</p><p><blockquote>不信任已经蔓延，一些交易员担心 wallstreetbets——激发游戏驿站狂热的最初 Reddit 留言板——发展如此之快，以至于它已经失去了最初的精神，并可能变得容易受到操纵。有些人搬到了其他留言板，如 r/superstonk，希望能重现老社区的风味。</blockquote></p><p> Travis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.</p><p><blockquote>社交媒体跟踪公司 Hype Equity 的创始人特拉维斯·雷尔 (Travis Rehl) 表示，他试图将可能的操纵者与更有机的投资者情绪区分开来。他说，炒作股权通常由代表网上谈论的公司的公关公司雇佣。现在，他看到了一种不断增长的趋势，即股票突然出现在留言板上，收到积极的聊天，然后消失。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from&nbsp;Barron’s&nbsp;for comment.</p><p><blockquote>“他说：”这让人怀疑什么是真正的讨论，什么是某人只想炒作的东西。wallstreetbets 的版主禁止在该平台上操纵市场，Rehl 表示，他们似乎正在努力遏制错误信息。主持人没有回应《巴伦周刊》的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> “If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.</p><p><blockquote>“索斯尼克说：”如果你能制造足够的轰动效应，让一只股票在短时间内上涨 10%、20%，甚至 50%，那么你就有巨大的动力去做这件事。</blockquote></p><p> The Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在关注留言板上的有趣交易。美国证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒（Gary Gensler）和一些国会议员讨论了改变市场规则，目的是增加保护散户交易者的透明度——尽管如果这些变化减缓交易速度或使交易成本更高，也可能激怒零售人群。</blockquote></p><p> Regulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”</p><p><blockquote>监管并不是唯一能遏制这一趋势的因素。fintech Betterment 行为金融和投资副总裁丹·伊根 (Dan Egan) 认为，这种势头可能会在 9 月份耗尽。即使是 “猿猴 ”也有责任。“他说：”孩子们开始重返校园；家长们也可以自由地再次上班了。“那是下一次从房间里抽出氧气的时候了。”</blockquote></p><p> Traditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.</p><p><blockquote>传统投资者可能会倾向于将整个现象视为由封锁和免费政府资金引发的暂时疯狂。但那将是一个错误。如果零佣金经纪和游戏驿站乐趣打破了数百万新投资者开户的障碍，那么只要大多数人用他们并不立即需要的钱下注，这几乎肯定是一件好事。许多新零售商表示，他们正在自学如何交易，并开始分散持股。</blockquote></p><p> In one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，这是华尔街未来的客户群。</blockquote></p><p> Arizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking&nbsp;research&nbsp;in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.</p><p><blockquote>亚利桑那州立大学教授亨德里克-贝森宾德（Hendrik Bessembinder）在2018年发表了一项开创性的研究，发现“在随机选择的月份随机选择的股票，亏损的可能性大于赚钱的可能性”。简而言之，挑选单只股票并持有集中投资组合往往是一种失败的策略。</blockquote></p><p> Even so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”</p><p><blockquote>即便如此，他还是对新一波交易感到鼓舞。“贝森宾德说：”我欢迎零售交易的增加，欢迎股票市场成为一个广泛参与的地方。“经济学家不能告诉人们他们不应该找点乐子”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-11 09:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It seemed to be only a matter of time.</p><p><blockquote>这似乎只是时间问题。</blockquote></p><p> When GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?</p><p><blockquote>当游戏驿站（股票代码：GME）、黑莓（BB），甚至百视达的干涸尸体在一月份突然复活时，它们何时会再次坠毁的时间已经在流逝。会是几个小时、几天还是几周？</blockquote></p><p> It has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like&nbsp;Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and&nbsp;Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.</p><p><blockquote>现在已经过去半年了，核心 “备忘录股票 ”的交易价格仍然处于研究这些股票多年的人认为离谱的水平。Clover Health Investments (CLOV) 和 Newegg Commerce (NEGG) 等新名称最近出现在留言板上，它们的股票也随之上涨。</blockquote></p><p> The collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.</p><p><blockquote>数百万散户交易员--长期以来被嘲笑为 “哑巴钱 ”--的集体努力成功地让股市飙升，并迫使反对者投降。</blockquote></p><p> That is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.</p><p><blockquote>尽管他们押注的公司几乎没有表现出业务转型的迹象，也没有表现出足以证明其估值的利润，但情况确实如此。黑莓在最近一个季度烧钱，并警告称其关键的网络安全部门将达到收入指导的低端；消息传出后，该股下跌，但在过去一年中仍上涨了一倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in&nbsp;AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than&nbsp;Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大型经纪商的交易量较 2 月份的峰值略有下降，但仍高于疫情爆发前的两到三倍。数量惊人的这种活动发生在散户交易者青睐的股票中。例如，AMC院线控股公司（AMC）6 月份的日均交易额达到 131 亿美元，超过了苹果（AAPL）的 95 亿美元和亚马逊（AMZN）的 103 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.</p><p><blockquote>即使冠状病毒在美国消退，大多数新交易者表示，他们仍然致力于他们在封锁期间学到的爱好——在一项Betterment调查中，58%的日内交易者表示，他们计划在未来进行更多的交易，只有12%的人计划减少交易。业余疫情面包师已经停止揉捏酸面团面包；交易者只会变得越来越饥饿。</blockquote></p><p> A sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.</p><p><blockquote>持续的熊市会破坏这种食欲，就像互联网泡沫破裂时一样。目前，下跌是持有或买入的理由。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25a79e71371c165f9a3a5085931fc487\" tg-width=\"979\" tg-height=\"649\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to&nbsp;Barron’s.</p><p><blockquote>“美国海军电子技术员布兰登-卢切克（Brandon Luczek）在给《巴伦周刊》的一封电子邮件中写道：”我看到'逢低买入'的情绪一刻也没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> The meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票飙升是由散户投资者交易的增加推动的。2020年，在线经纪商以创纪录的速度签约客户，超过1000万人开设了新账户。这一记录几乎肯定会在2021年被打破。一些顶级公司透露，在今年不到一半的时间里，经纪商已经增加了超过 1000 万个账户。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent&nbsp;Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.</p><p><blockquote>模因股票既是这种现象的推车，也是马。他们的价格突然飙升是由新投资者推动的，然后这一行动推动更多的新人投资。数百万人在 1 月底和 2 月初下载了投资应用程序，只是为了享受乐趣。嘉信理财（SCHW）最近的一项调查发现，15%的现有交易者在2020年后开始投资。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/167386c6881a258922ad62caaf7a05f4\" tg-width=\"971\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e29e3041b91070252ab9063d1a11fa2\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"642\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9cc1c0bd6368721c0eca87e25719f16\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"641\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.</p><p><blockquote>激增中最突出的参与者是 Robinhood，该公司表示仅在第一季度就增加了 550 万个资金账户。但它并不孤单。例如，富达宣布，第一季度吸引了 160 万 35 岁以下的新客户，比去年同期增长了 223%。</blockquote></p><p> Under pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>在 Robinhood 零佣金模式的压力下，所有主要经纪商都在 2019 年将佣金降至零。这为新客户群体打开了闸门——他们可能没有那么多闲置现金进行交易，但比前辈更加活跃和多样化。经纪人正在套现。富达希望在投资者获得驾照之前就吸引他们，允许年仅 13 岁的儿童开设交易账户。Robinhood 正在乘势而上进行首次公开募股，分析师预计其估值将超过其收入的 10 倍。</blockquote></p><p> These new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”</p><p><blockquote>这些新客户的行为与他们的老同行不同。E*Trade 交易主管克里斯-拉金（Chris Larkin）说，多年来，“ETF 一直备受青睐”，E*Trade 现归摩根士丹利（MS）所有。但挑选个股显然是 “2021 年的大新闻”。</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是，随着世界各地的投资者押注疫情复苏并避免疲软的债券收益率，股票交易所交易基金仍然表现良好。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.</p><p><blockquote>但 ETF 不像股票那样点亮留言板。这并不是说顶级公司的单行道。游戏驿站二月份确实下跌，华尔街享受了幸灾乐祸的时刻。它并没有持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> “Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.</p><p><blockquote>“盈透证券（Interactive Brokers）首席策略师史蒂夫-索斯尼克（Steve Sosnick）写道：”就像蝉一样，备忘录交易者在表面上隐匿了几个月后又重新活跃起来。索斯尼克认为，模因股票的交易往往与加密货币相反，因为随着势头的变化，它们的粉丝会从一种货币转向另一种货币。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道：”我不认为，在比特币和其他加密货币大幅回调后，备忘录股票卷土重来完全是巧合。</blockquote></p><p> Sosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.</p><p><blockquote>索斯尼克认为备忘录股票是一个 “独立的板块”，他在电脑显示器上将其与其他股票代码分开。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，华尔街对备忘录股票革命的反应一直是孤立专业人士认为不理性的市场部分。大多数卖空者不会碰这些股票，分析师也在放弃报道。</blockquote></p><p> But Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.</p><p><blockquote>但华尔街不能像蝉一样把零售大军赶走，也不能指望它们在未来 17 年内消失。股票交易已经发生了永久性的变化。今年，零售活动占股本量的 24%，高于 2019 年的 15%。新信条的追随者不是愿意让华尔街管理市场的被动观察者。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/710e642d3b685b74f8c9dcaf46ef3e0b\" tg-width=\"968\" tg-height=\"643\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”</p><p><blockquote>“哥伦比亚法学院（Columbia Law School）专门研究证券市场的教授约书亚-米茨（Joshua Mitts）说：”这实际上反映了我们所看到的趋势的逆转，即与个别公司的接触越来越少。“技术正在拉近普通投资者与他或她所投资的公司的距离，而这只是以新的、不可预测的形式出现。”</blockquote></p><p> The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.</p><p><blockquote>你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> — Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube</p><p><blockquote>— Matt Kohrs，26 岁，每天在 YouTube 上直播股票分析</blockquote></p><p> It is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.</p><p><blockquote>它现在正在改变那些早早加入的人的生活，并且仍然在更高的名字上。</blockquote></p><p> Take Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming&nbsp;stock analysis on YouTube&nbsp;for seven hours a day.</p><p><blockquote>以马特·科尔斯为例，他很早就投资了AMC院线。今年2月，他辞去了纽约程序员的工作，搬到了费城，并开始在YouTube上每天7个小时直播股票分析。</blockquote></p><p> With 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.</p><p><blockquote>YouTube 拥有 35 万粉丝，它正在支付账单。科尔斯说，凭借广告和股票的收入，他可以拿到与以前大致相同的工资。但他也知道，像这样依赖股票收益与朝九晚五的工作完全不同。</blockquote></p><p> “The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>“他说：”你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> Companies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.</p><p><blockquote>公司也开始做出更积极的反应。他们要么拥抱他们的新主人，要么付钱给迷因学家来理解新华尔街充满表情符号的语言，这样他们就可以阻止他们或安抚他们。</blockquote></p><p> AMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 甚至在上周取消了一项拟议的股权融资，因为该公司显然不喜欢 Reddit 人群的反响。过去一年，AMC 的股票数量已经增加了五倍。首席执行官亚当-阿伦（Adam Aron）在推特上表示，他看到了 “许多人赞成，许多人反对 ”对他增发 2500 万股股票的提议的反应，因此该提议将被取消，而不是在本月晚些时候的 AMC 年会上进行表决。该公司没有回答有关如何调查股东的问题。</blockquote></p><p> Forget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.</p><p><blockquote>忘了会议室吧。公司政策现在正在聊天室里决定。</blockquote></p><p> Big investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.</p><p><blockquote>大投资者正在花费更多时间跟踪社交媒体上有关股票的讨论。美国银行在今年的一项调查中发现，大约25%的机构已经在跟踪社交媒体情绪，但大约40%的机构有兴趣在未来使用它。</blockquote></p><p> In the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几个月里，美国银行、摩根士丹利和摩根大通都发布了关于如何围绕零售行动进行交易的报告，得出了有些不同的结论。</blockquote></p><p> There can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.</p><p><blockquote>正如摩根士丹利所说，信号中可能存在 “阿尔法”，但要实现这一目标可能需要一些紧张的数字运算。当然，并不是所有的留言板聊天都会导致价格持续上涨，如果没有大量的数据分析，零售订单流很难与机构流分开。对于拥有工具来确定散户投资者正在购买哪些股票和正在出售哪些股票的投资者来说，摩根大通建议做多买入兴趣最高的 20% 的股票，做空卖出兴趣最高的 20% 的股票。</blockquote></p><p> For now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>提供跟踪社交媒体情绪产品的另类数据公司Thinknum的鲍里斯·斯皮瓦克(Boris Spiwak)表示，目前，许多购买社交媒体情绪数据的机构似乎都在试图降低风险，而不是寻找新的机会。“他说：”他们认为这几乎就像一份保险，以限制他们的下行风险。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.</p><p><blockquote>对于零售商来说，这种方法并不总是科学的。这一行动是由社区精神支撑的。其背后的力量既是情感上的，也是道德上的，也是经济上的。</blockquote></p><p> New investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>新投资者表示，他们的动机是希望证明自己，并像利润一样惩罚保守派。他们互相学习市场，有时会放大或揭穿关于华尔街的阴谋论。一些人将模因股票运动与2008年金融危机引发的对大型金融机构的持续不信任联系起来。</blockquote></p><p> “Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”</p><p><blockquote>“26 岁的科尔斯说：”华尔街让我们的经济陷入困境，但没有人因此惹上麻烦。“所以，我认为他们认为我们不仅可以赚钱，还可以让华尔街的这些对冲基金付钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Claire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”</p><p><blockquote>克莱尔·赫希伯格 (Claire Hirschberg) 是一名 28 岁的工会组织者，她在 1 月份从朋友那里听说 Robinhood 上购买了价值约 50 美元的游戏驿站股票。她喜欢这个想法，但真正让她兴奋的是她父亲的反应，他是一名长期的资金经理。“她笑着说：”他很生气我买了游戏驿站，还不肯卖。“这让我想永远拿着它。”</blockquote></p><p> Just like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.</p><p><blockquote>就像老华尔街有仪式和准则一样，新华尔街也有。一位新的投资银行员工很快就会知道，在你成为合伙人之前，你不会打菲拉格慕领带。在总经理离开之前，你从不离开办公室，你也不会抱怨工作时间。坏人是监管者和参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦，而且不是按顺序。</blockquote></p><p> The new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.</p><p><blockquote>新的交易台——数百万散户交易者现在使用的应用程序和他们聚集的留言板——也有潜规则。公开承认财务损失是一种勇敢的行为，是内部坚韧和对本集团信念的证明。你不把自己当回事，也不规范语言。你是 “猿类 ”或 “弱智 ”大军的一员。你坚持住，即使这意味着你可能会失去一切。坏人依次是卖空者、做市商和华尔街精英。</blockquote></p><p> The group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>集体行动不仅仅是为了精神支持。交易策略取决于人们保持买入压力，迫使做空，或买入看涨期权，从而引发所谓的伽马挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75d79c78a14cc8f297e17397cc54bdb5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Keith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>基思·吉尔 (Keith Gill) 在二月份众议院金融服务委员会听证会上虚拟露面，成为 Reddit 散户交易员大军推高游戏驿站股价的代言人。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Many short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.</p><p><blockquote>许多卖空者表示，他们不会再碰这些股票了。但显然，其他人并没有采纳这一建议，而是通过反复做空股票来给备忘录运动注入氧气。6 月中旬，AMC 的空头权益占该股流通量的 17%，低于 1 月份的 28%，但降幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> As the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”</p><p><blockquote>随着价格上涨，空头们也控制不住自己。多年来一直关注游戏驿站的韦德布什证券分析师迈克尔-帕切特（Michael Pachter）说，他们开始 “流口水，耳朵里冒出火焰”。“他说：”让我感到震惊的是精神错乱的定义，就是一遍又一遍地做同样的事情，每次都希望有不同的结果，而空头却不断出现。“[游戏驿站公牛]基思-吉尔（Keith Gill）和他的 Reddit raiders 一直在挤压他们，而且一直在起作用。”</blockquote></p><p> To beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath &amp; Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.</p><p><blockquote>为了击败卖空者，Reddit 人群需要团结起来，但该社区有时会出现裂缝。拥有最坚定粉丝群的两只模因股票——游戏驿站和 AMC——仍然拥有庞大的核心信徒大军，他们似乎不容易动摇。但其他名字似乎有更善变的支持者。几只陷入迷因疯狂的股票已经崩溃。 Bed Bath &amp; Beyond (BBBY) 在 1 月底和 6 月初两次飙升，但现在的交易价格仅略高于 1 月中旬的水平。在上涨期间买入的人已经赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Distrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.</p><p><blockquote>不信任已经蔓延，一些交易员担心 wallstreetbets——激发游戏驿站狂热的最初 Reddit 留言板——发展如此之快，以至于它已经失去了最初的精神，并可能变得容易受到操纵。有些人搬到了其他留言板，如 r/superstonk，希望能重现老社区的风味。</blockquote></p><p> Travis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.</p><p><blockquote>社交媒体跟踪公司 Hype Equity 的创始人特拉维斯·雷尔 (Travis Rehl) 表示，他试图将可能的操纵者与更有机的投资者情绪区分开来。他说，炒作股权通常由代表网上谈论的公司的公关公司雇佣。现在，他看到了一种不断增长的趋势，即股票突然出现在留言板上，收到积极的聊天，然后消失。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from&nbsp;Barron’s&nbsp;for comment.</p><p><blockquote>“他说：”这让人怀疑什么是真正的讨论，什么是某人只想炒作的东西。wallstreetbets 的版主禁止在该平台上操纵市场，Rehl 表示，他们似乎正在努力遏制错误信息。主持人没有回应《巴伦周刊》的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> “If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.</p><p><blockquote>“索斯尼克说：”如果你能制造足够的轰动效应，让一只股票在短时间内上涨 10%、20%，甚至 50%，那么你就有巨大的动力去做这件事。</blockquote></p><p> The Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在关注留言板上的有趣交易。美国证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒（Gary Gensler）和一些国会议员讨论了改变市场规则，目的是增加保护散户交易者的透明度——尽管如果这些变化减缓交易速度或使交易成本更高，也可能激怒零售人群。</blockquote></p><p> Regulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”</p><p><blockquote>监管并不是唯一能遏制这一趋势的因素。fintech Betterment 行为金融和投资副总裁丹·伊根 (Dan Egan) 认为，这种势头可能会在 9 月份耗尽。即使是 “猿猴 ”也有责任。“他说：”孩子们开始重返校园；家长们也可以自由地再次上班了。“那是下一次从房间里抽出氧气的时候了。”</blockquote></p><p> Traditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.</p><p><blockquote>传统投资者可能会倾向于将整个现象视为由封锁和免费政府资金引发的暂时疯狂。但那将是一个错误。如果零佣金经纪和游戏驿站乐趣打破了数百万新投资者开户的障碍，那么只要大多数人用他们并不立即需要的钱下注，这几乎肯定是一件好事。许多新零售商表示，他们正在自学如何交易，并开始分散持股。</blockquote></p><p> In one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，这是华尔街未来的客户群。</blockquote></p><p> Arizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking&nbsp;research&nbsp;in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.</p><p><blockquote>亚利桑那州立大学教授亨德里克-贝森宾德（Hendrik Bessembinder）在2018年发表了一项开创性的研究，发现“在随机选择的月份随机选择的股票，亏损的可能性大于赚钱的可能性”。简而言之，挑选单只股票并持有集中投资组合往往是一种失败的策略。</blockquote></p><p> Even so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”</p><p><blockquote>即便如此，他还是对新一波交易感到鼓舞。“贝森宾德说：”我欢迎零售交易的增加，欢迎股票市场成为一个广泛参与的地方。“经济学家不能告诉人们他们不应该找点乐子”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-meme-stock-trade-is-far-from-over-what-investors-need-to-know-51625875247?mod=hp_HERO\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SCHW":"嘉信理财","WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","CARV":"卡弗储蓄","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp","BB":"黑莓","AMC":"AMC院线","NEGG":"Newegg Comm Inc.","GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-meme-stock-trade-is-far-from-over-what-investors-need-to-know-51625875247?mod=hp_HERO","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112201050","content_text":"It seemed to be only a matter of time.\nWhen GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?\nIt has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.\nThe collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.\nThat is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.\nWhile trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.\nEven as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.\nA sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.\n\n“I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to Barron’s.\nThe meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.\nMeme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.\n\nThe most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.\nUnder pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.\nThese new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”\nTo be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.\nBut ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.\n“Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.\n“I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.\nSosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.\nIndeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.\nBut Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.\n\n“What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”\nThe swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.\n— Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube\nIt is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.\nTake Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming stock analysis on YouTube for seven hours a day.\nWith 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.\n“The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.\nCompanies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.\nAMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.\nForget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.\nBig investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.\nIn the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.\nThere can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.\nFor now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.\nFor retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.\nNew investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.\n“Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”\nClaire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”\nJust like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.\nThe new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.\nThe group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.\nKeith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.\nMany short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.\nAs the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”\nTo beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.\nDistrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.\nTravis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.\n“It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from Barron’s for comment.\n“If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.\nThe Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.\nRegulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”\nTraditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.\nIn one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.\nArizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking research in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.\nEven so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BBBY":0.9,"MRIN":0.9,"AMC":0.9,"SCHW":0.9,"CLOV":0.9,"CARV":0.9,"WKHS":0.9,"NEGG":0.9,"GME":0.9,"BB":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":618,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":837578401,"gmtCreate":1629902312803,"gmtModify":1631889730941,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Sp","listText":"Sp","text":"Sp","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/837578401","repostId":"2162087564","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2892,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":835469995,"gmtCreate":1629732365117,"gmtModify":1631889730952,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Wu","listText":"Wu","text":"Wu","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/835469995","repostId":"2161177144","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2161177144","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1629732054,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2161177144?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-23 23:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed to keep pumping roughly $1 trillion of liquidity into markets during tapering, JPMorgan says<blockquote>摩根大通表示，美联储将在缩减规模期间继续向市场注入约 1 万亿美元流动性</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2161177144","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $8","content":"<p>Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system,' JPM strategists write</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通策略师写道，假设美联储明年8月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到8500亿美元至1万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系”</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/141450195b75f13f45c2e7df7f920463\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC. is pictured, above, in file photo taken this month.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>DC华盛顿州的美联储大楼。上图是本月拍摄的档案照片。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Federal Reserve policy makers will still be injecting roughly $1 trillion into markets during the time it takes to start and end the tapering of $120 billion in monthly bond purchases, according to strategists.</p><p><blockquote>策略师表示，在开始和结束每月1200亿美元债券购买规模缩减期间，美联储政策制定者仍将向市场注入约1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> That assumes an announcement comes in December and it takes eight months to complete the pullback, strategists Teresa Ho and Alex Roever at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(JPM)$</a> wrote in a note released Sunday, reiterating similar views they made on Aug. 6. </p><p><blockquote>摩根大通 (JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co) 策略师 Teresa Ho 和 Alex Roever 表示，这假设在 12 月发布公告，并且需要八个月的时间才能完成回调。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(摩根大通)$</a>在周日发布的一份说明中写道，重申了他们在8月6日表达的类似观点。</blockquote></p><p> Amid this week's start to the Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual symposium, investors will be keeping a close eye on when and by how much the central bank might be paring back on its purchases -- which many regard as scaling back on stimulus. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&amp;P 500 index booked their worst declines in a month on Aug. 18 after Fed minutes showed most officials backing a start of tapering this year.</p><p><blockquote>在本周堪萨斯城美联储年度研讨会开始之际，投资者将密切关注美联储可能何时以及削减多少购买——许多人认为这是缩减刺激措施。8 月 18 日，美联储会议纪要显示大多数官员支持今年开始缩减规模，道琼斯工业平均指数和标普500指数创下一个月来最严重的跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> But as JPMorgan's note points out, the Fed would still be supplying stimulus -- just at a reduced pace -- and the abundance of a cash already in the system will still keep growing.</p><p><blockquote>但正如摩根大通的报告指出的那样，美联储仍将提供刺激措施——只是速度有所放缓——而且系统中已有的现金充裕程度仍将继续增长。</blockquote></p><p> \"We continue to think a tapering announcement would come in December, though the risk of an announcement in November has increased,\" the strategists wrote. \"Realistically, the timing difference between November and December is $120bn/mo. more in asset purchases.\" Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, \"this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system.\"</p><p><blockquote>策略师写道：“我们仍然认为缩减规模的公告将在 12 月发布，尽管 11 月宣布的风险有所增加。”“实际上，11 月和 12 月之间的时间差为每月 1200 亿美元。更多的是资产购买。”假设美联储明年 8 月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到 8500 亿美元至 1 万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系。”</blockquote></p><p> The strategists also weighed in on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's future, by reiterating JPMorgan's view that there's \"a significant chance\" he won't be renominated when his term ends in February 2022.</p><p><blockquote>策略师们还对美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的未来进行了权衡，重申了摩根大通的观点，即他在 2022 年 2 月任期结束时“很有可能”不会获得连任。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed to keep pumping roughly $1 trillion of liquidity into markets during tapering, JPMorgan says<blockquote>摩根大通表示，美联储将在缩减规模期间继续向市场注入约 1 万亿美元流动性</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed to keep pumping roughly $1 trillion of liquidity into markets during tapering, JPMorgan says<blockquote>摩根大通表示，美联储将在缩减规模期间继续向市场注入约 1 万亿美元流动性</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-23 23:20</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system,' JPM strategists write</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通策略师写道，假设美联储明年8月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到8500亿美元至1万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系”</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/141450195b75f13f45c2e7df7f920463\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC. is pictured, above, in file photo taken this month.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>DC华盛顿州的美联储大楼。上图是本月拍摄的档案照片。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Federal Reserve policy makers will still be injecting roughly $1 trillion into markets during the time it takes to start and end the tapering of $120 billion in monthly bond purchases, according to strategists.</p><p><blockquote>策略师表示，在开始和结束每月1200亿美元债券购买规模缩减期间，美联储政策制定者仍将向市场注入约1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> That assumes an announcement comes in December and it takes eight months to complete the pullback, strategists Teresa Ho and Alex Roever at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(JPM)$</a> wrote in a note released Sunday, reiterating similar views they made on Aug. 6. </p><p><blockquote>摩根大通 (JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co) 策略师 Teresa Ho 和 Alex Roever 表示，这假设在 12 月发布公告，并且需要八个月的时间才能完成回调。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">$(摩根大通)$</a>在周日发布的一份说明中写道，重申了他们在8月6日表达的类似观点。</blockquote></p><p> Amid this week's start to the Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual symposium, investors will be keeping a close eye on when and by how much the central bank might be paring back on its purchases -- which many regard as scaling back on stimulus. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&amp;P 500 index booked their worst declines in a month on Aug. 18 after Fed minutes showed most officials backing a start of tapering this year.</p><p><blockquote>在本周堪萨斯城美联储年度研讨会开始之际，投资者将密切关注美联储可能何时以及削减多少购买——许多人认为这是缩减刺激措施。8 月 18 日，美联储会议纪要显示大多数官员支持今年开始缩减规模，道琼斯工业平均指数和标普500指数创下一个月来最严重的跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> But as JPMorgan's note points out, the Fed would still be supplying stimulus -- just at a reduced pace -- and the abundance of a cash already in the system will still keep growing.</p><p><blockquote>但正如摩根大通的报告指出的那样，美联储仍将提供刺激措施——只是速度有所放缓——而且系统中已有的现金充裕程度仍将继续增长。</blockquote></p><p> \"We continue to think a tapering announcement would come in December, though the risk of an announcement in November has increased,\" the strategists wrote. \"Realistically, the timing difference between November and December is $120bn/mo. more in asset purchases.\" Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, \"this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system.\"</p><p><blockquote>策略师写道：“我们仍然认为缩减规模的公告将在 12 月发布，尽管 11 月宣布的风险有所增加。”“实际上，11 月和 12 月之间的时间差为每月 1200 亿美元。更多的是资产购买。”假设美联储明年 8 月完成缩减规模，“这仍然意味着我们可能会看到 8500 亿美元至 1 万亿美元的额外流动性注入金融体系。”</blockquote></p><p> The strategists also weighed in on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's future, by reiterating JPMorgan's view that there's \"a significant chance\" he won't be renominated when his term ends in February 2022.</p><p><blockquote>策略师们还对美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的未来进行了权衡，重申了摩根大通的观点，即他在 2022 年 2 月任期结束时“很有可能”不会获得连任。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-to-keep-pumping-roughly-1-trillion-of-liquidity-into-markets-during-tapering-jpmorgan-says-11629731508?mod=hp_LATEST\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-to-keep-pumping-roughly-1-trillion-of-liquidity-into-markets-during-tapering-jpmorgan-says-11629731508?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2161177144","content_text":"Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, 'this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system,' JPM strategists write\nThe Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC. is pictured, above, in file photo taken this month.\nFederal Reserve policy makers will still be injecting roughly $1 trillion into markets during the time it takes to start and end the tapering of $120 billion in monthly bond purchases, according to strategists.\nThat assumes an announcement comes in December and it takes eight months to complete the pullback, strategists Teresa Ho and Alex Roever at JPMorgan Chase & Co. $(JPM)$ wrote in a note released Sunday, reiterating similar views they made on Aug. 6. \nAmid this week's start to the Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual symposium, investors will be keeping a close eye on when and by how much the central bank might be paring back on its purchases -- which many regard as scaling back on stimulus. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 index booked their worst declines in a month on Aug. 18 after Fed minutes showed most officials backing a start of tapering this year.\nBut as JPMorgan's note points out, the Fed would still be supplying stimulus -- just at a reduced pace -- and the abundance of a cash already in the system will still keep growing.\n\"We continue to think a tapering announcement would come in December, though the risk of an announcement in November has increased,\" the strategists wrote. \"Realistically, the timing difference between November and December is $120bn/mo. more in asset purchases.\" Assuming the Fed finishes tapering next August, \"this still means that we could see anywhere from $850bn to $1tn of additional liquidity being injected in the financial system.\"\nThe strategists also weighed in on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's future, by reiterating JPMorgan's view that there's \"a significant chance\" he won't be renominated when his term ends in February 2022.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2022,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":895861709,"gmtCreate":1628733844301,"gmtModify":1631891882387,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Yo","listText":"Yo","text":"Yo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/895861709","repostId":"1146833505","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1137,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896382059,"gmtCreate":1628556736271,"gmtModify":1631891882395,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nic","listText":"Nic","text":"Nic","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896382059","repostId":"1196813173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1028,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897026189,"gmtCreate":1628863908041,"gmtModify":1631891882384,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Yo","listText":"Yo","text":"Yo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897026189","repostId":"2159903472","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159903472","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628863309,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2159903472?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-13 22:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159903472","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE: XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XL）周五股价走低，此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分，低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元，低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信，市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚，然而，供应链问题和关键材料（尤其是微芯片）的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业，严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为：</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元，最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时，该股下跌 6.90%，至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-13 22:01</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XL）周五股价走低，此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分，低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元，低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信，市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚，然而，供应链问题和关键材料（尤其是微芯片）的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业，严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为：</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元，最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时，该股下跌 6.90%，至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159903472","content_text":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.\nXL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.\nWe believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said Dimitri Kazarinoff, CEO of XL Fleet.\nXL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.\nPrice Action: XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.\nAt last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801761033,"gmtCreate":1627535716122,"gmtModify":1631893596060,"author":{"id":"3574899797175889","authorId":"3574899797175889","name":"stonker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bed6c0d56fcf5940d74693ce8e03a8b2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574899797175889","authorIdStr":"3574899797175889"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801761033","repostId":"1127264445","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127264445","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627514621,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1127264445?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-29 07:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 ends off day's lows; Powell says Fed still a ways away from rate hikes<blockquote>标普500结束当日低点；鲍威尔表示美联储距离加息还有一段路要走</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127264445","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&P 500 ended little changed on Wednesday but off its session lows after th","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 ended little changed on Wednesday but off its session lows after the Federal Reserve said the U.S. economic recovery remains on track and Chair Jerome <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POWL\">Powell</a> said the central bank was still a ways away from considering raising interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>路透纽约2月29日 - 标普500周三收盘变化不大，但在美联储表示美国经济复苏仍在轨道上，美联储主席Jerome<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POWL\">鲍威尔</a>表示央行距离考虑加息还有一段距离。</blockquote></p><p> Keeping the market in check, shares of tech giant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc fell 1.2% after it forecast slowing revenue growth.</p><p><blockquote>控制市场，科技巨头的股票<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>Inc 在预测收入增长放缓后下跌 1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> In a news conference following the release of a new policy statement from the Fed, Powell also said the U.S. job market still had “some ground to cover” before it would be time to pull back from the economic support the U.S. central bank put in place in the spring of 2020 to battle the coronavirus pandemic’s economic shocks.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储发布新政策声明后的新闻发布会上，鲍威尔还表示，在美国央行于 2020 年春季为应对冠状病毒大流行带来的经济冲击而实施的经济支持之前，美国就业市场仍有 “一些需要填补的空间”。</blockquote></p><p> “It looks like probably the most positive thing for the market was that they are nowhere near increasing interest rates,” said Alan Lancz, president, Alan B. Lancz &amp; Associates Inc, an investment advisory firm based in Toledo, Ohio.</p><p><blockquote>“总部位于俄亥俄州托莱多的投资咨询公司 Alan B. Lancz &amp; Associates Inc. 总裁艾伦-兰茨（Alan Lancz）说：”看来，对市场来说最积极的事情可能是，他们远未加息。</blockquote></p><p> Right after the Fed statement, the S&amp;P 500 index reversed slight declines though it still ended a hair lower on the day.</p><p><blockquote>美联储声明发布后，标普500指数扭转了小幅跌势，但当天收盘仍小幅下跌。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">Investors</a> have been worried about how rising inflation and a spike in COVID-19 cases might impact the central bank’s plan to potentially start withdrawing its stimulus.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">投资者</a>一直担心通胀上升和 COVID-19 病例激增会如何影响央行可能开始撤回刺激计划的计划。</blockquote></p><p> The central bank also said that higher inflation remained the result of “transitory factors.” The Fed kept its overnight benchmark interest rate near zero and left unchanged its bond-buying program.</p><p><blockquote>央行还表示，通胀上升仍然是 “暂时因素 ”的结果。美联储将隔夜基准利率维持在接近于零的水平，并维持债券购买计划不变。</blockquote></p><p> The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> ended higher and shares of Google parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc hit an all-time high as a surge in advertising spending helped it post record quarterly results. The stock ended up 3.2%.</p><p><blockquote>这个<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">纳斯达克</a>谷歌母公司股价收高<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>Inc 创下历史新高，广告支出激增帮助其公布了创纪录的季度业绩。该股收盘上涨3.2%。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 127.59 points, or 0.36%, to 34,930.93, the S&amp;P 500 lost 0.82 point, or 0.02%, to 4,400.64 and the Nasdaq Composite added 102.01 points, or 0.7%, to 14,762.58.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌127.59点，跌幅0.36%，至34,930.93点；标普500指数下跌0.82点，跌幅0.02%，至4,400.64点；纳斯达克综合指数上涨102.01点，跌幅0.7%，至14,762.58点。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed’s statement came at the conclusion of its latest two-day policy meeting.</p><p><blockquote>美联储是在最近一次为期两天的政策会议结束时发表上述声明的。</blockquote></p><p> “They had a chance to signal they were going to become more hawkish and they chose not to take it. The most important thing is they are predictable and they are remaining predictable,” said Ellen Hazen, portfolio manager at F.L. Putnam Investment Management in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEBK\">Wellesley</a>, Massachusetts.</p><p><blockquote>“他们有机会发出信号，表明他们将变得更加鹰派，但他们选择不接受。最重要的是，他们是可预测的，而且他们仍然是可预测的，”F.L. 的投资组合经理艾伦-哈森（Ellen Hazen）说。普特南投资管理公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEBK\">韦尔斯利</a>马萨诸塞州。</blockquote></p><p> In other earnings news, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp ended down 0.1% even as a boom in cloud services helped it beat Wall Street expectations for revenue and earnings.</p><p><blockquote>在其他财报新闻中，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">微软</a>尽管云服务的繁荣帮助该公司的收入和盈利超出了华尔街的预期，但该公司最终下跌了 0.1%。</blockquote></p><p> Volume on U.S. exchanges was 9.86 billion shares, compared with a similar average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所的成交量为 98.6 亿股，而过去 20 个交易日整个交易日的平均成交量也类似。</blockquote></p><p> Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.85-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.61-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨发行量超过下跌发行量，比例为 1.85 比 1；在纳斯达克，2.61比1的比率有利于进步人士。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 posted 42 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 44 new highs and 67 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下42个52周新高，没有新低；纳斯达克综合指数创下44个新高和67个新低。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 ends off day's lows; Powell says Fed still a ways away from rate hikes<blockquote>标普500结束当日低点；鲍威尔表示美联储距离加息还有一段路要走</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 ends off day's lows; Powell says Fed still a ways away from rate hikes<blockquote>标普500结束当日低点；鲍威尔表示美联储距离加息还有一段路要走</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-29 07:23</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 ended little changed on Wednesday but off its session lows after the Federal Reserve said the U.S. economic recovery remains on track and Chair Jerome <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POWL\">Powell</a> said the central bank was still a ways away from considering raising interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>路透纽约2月29日 - 标普500周三收盘变化不大，但在美联储表示美国经济复苏仍在轨道上，美联储主席Jerome<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POWL\">鲍威尔</a>表示央行距离考虑加息还有一段距离。</blockquote></p><p> Keeping the market in check, shares of tech giant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc fell 1.2% after it forecast slowing revenue growth.</p><p><blockquote>控制市场，科技巨头的股票<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>Inc 在预测收入增长放缓后下跌 1.2%。</blockquote></p><p> In a news conference following the release of a new policy statement from the Fed, Powell also said the U.S. job market still had “some ground to cover” before it would be time to pull back from the economic support the U.S. central bank put in place in the spring of 2020 to battle the coronavirus pandemic’s economic shocks.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储发布新政策声明后的新闻发布会上，鲍威尔还表示，在美国央行于 2020 年春季为应对冠状病毒大流行带来的经济冲击而实施的经济支持之前，美国就业市场仍有 “一些需要填补的空间”。</blockquote></p><p> “It looks like probably the most positive thing for the market was that they are nowhere near increasing interest rates,” said Alan Lancz, president, Alan B. Lancz &amp; Associates Inc, an investment advisory firm based in Toledo, Ohio.</p><p><blockquote>“总部位于俄亥俄州托莱多的投资咨询公司 Alan B. Lancz &amp; Associates Inc. 总裁艾伦-兰茨（Alan Lancz）说：”看来，对市场来说最积极的事情可能是，他们远未加息。</blockquote></p><p> Right after the Fed statement, the S&amp;P 500 index reversed slight declines though it still ended a hair lower on the day.</p><p><blockquote>美联储声明发布后，标普500指数扭转了小幅跌势，但当天收盘仍小幅下跌。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">Investors</a> have been worried about how rising inflation and a spike in COVID-19 cases might impact the central bank’s plan to potentially start withdrawing its stimulus.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">投资者</a>一直担心通胀上升和 COVID-19 病例激增会如何影响央行可能开始撤回刺激计划的计划。</blockquote></p><p> The central bank also said that higher inflation remained the result of “transitory factors.” The Fed kept its overnight benchmark interest rate near zero and left unchanged its bond-buying program.</p><p><blockquote>央行还表示，通胀上升仍然是 “暂时因素 ”的结果。美联储将隔夜基准利率维持在接近于零的水平，并维持债券购买计划不变。</blockquote></p><p> The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> ended higher and shares of Google parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc hit an all-time high as a surge in advertising spending helped it post record quarterly results. The stock ended up 3.2%.</p><p><blockquote>这个<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">纳斯达克</a>谷歌母公司股价收高<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>Inc 创下历史新高，广告支出激增帮助其公布了创纪录的季度业绩。该股收盘上涨3.2%。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 127.59 points, or 0.36%, to 34,930.93, the S&amp;P 500 lost 0.82 point, or 0.02%, to 4,400.64 and the Nasdaq Composite added 102.01 points, or 0.7%, to 14,762.58.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌127.59点，跌幅0.36%，至34,930.93点；标普500指数下跌0.82点，跌幅0.02%，至4,400.64点；纳斯达克综合指数上涨102.01点，跌幅0.7%，至14,762.58点。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed’s statement came at the conclusion of its latest two-day policy meeting.</p><p><blockquote>美联储是在最近一次为期两天的政策会议结束时发表上述声明的。</blockquote></p><p> “They had a chance to signal they were going to become more hawkish and they chose not to take it. The most important thing is they are predictable and they are remaining predictable,” said Ellen Hazen, portfolio manager at F.L. Putnam Investment Management in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEBK\">Wellesley</a>, Massachusetts.</p><p><blockquote>“他们有机会发出信号，表明他们将变得更加鹰派，但他们选择不接受。最重要的是，他们是可预测的，而且他们仍然是可预测的，”F.L. 的投资组合经理艾伦-哈森（Ellen Hazen）说。普特南投资管理公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEBK\">韦尔斯利</a>马萨诸塞州。</blockquote></p><p> In other earnings news, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp ended down 0.1% even as a boom in cloud services helped it beat Wall Street expectations for revenue and earnings.</p><p><blockquote>在其他财报新闻中，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">微软</a>尽管云服务的繁荣帮助该公司的收入和盈利超出了华尔街的预期，但该公司最终下跌了 0.1%。</blockquote></p><p> Volume on U.S. exchanges was 9.86 billion shares, compared with a similar average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所的成交量为 98.6 亿股，而过去 20 个交易日整个交易日的平均成交量也类似。</blockquote></p><p> Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.85-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.61-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨发行量超过下跌发行量，比例为 1.85 比 1；在纳斯达克，2.61比1的比率有利于进步人士。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 posted 42 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 44 new highs and 67 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下42个52周新高，没有新低；纳斯达克综合指数创下44个新高和67个新低。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-ends-off-days-lows-powell-says-fed-still-a-ways-away-from-rate-hikes-idUSL1N2P435H\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","OEX":"标普100",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-ends-off-days-lows-powell-says-fed-still-a-ways-away-from-rate-hikes-idUSL1N2P435H","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127264445","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&P 500 ended little changed on Wednesday but off its session lows after the Federal Reserve said the U.S. economic recovery remains on track and Chair Jerome Powell said the central bank was still a ways away from considering raising interest rates.\nKeeping the market in check, shares of tech giant Apple Inc fell 1.2% after it forecast slowing revenue growth.\nIn a news conference following the release of a new policy statement from the Fed, Powell also said the U.S. job market still had “some ground to cover” before it would be time to pull back from the economic support the U.S. central bank put in place in the spring of 2020 to battle the coronavirus pandemic’s economic shocks.\n“It looks like probably the most positive thing for the market was that they are nowhere near increasing interest rates,” said Alan Lancz, president, Alan B. Lancz & Associates Inc, an investment advisory firm based in Toledo, Ohio.\nRight after the Fed statement, the S&P 500 index reversed slight declines though it still ended a hair lower on the day.\nInvestors have been worried about how rising inflation and a spike in COVID-19 cases might impact the central bank’s plan to potentially start withdrawing its stimulus.\nThe central bank also said that higher inflation remained the result of “transitory factors.” The Fed kept its overnight benchmark interest rate near zero and left unchanged its bond-buying program.\nThe Nasdaq ended higher and shares of Google parent Alphabet Inc hit an all-time high as a surge in advertising spending helped it post record quarterly results. The stock ended up 3.2%.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 127.59 points, or 0.36%, to 34,930.93, the S&P 500 lost 0.82 point, or 0.02%, to 4,400.64 and the Nasdaq Composite added 102.01 points, or 0.7%, to 14,762.58.\nThe Fed’s statement came at the conclusion of its latest two-day policy meeting.\n“They had a chance to signal they were going to become more hawkish and they chose not to take it. The most important thing is they are predictable and they are remaining predictable,” said Ellen Hazen, portfolio manager at F.L. Putnam Investment Management in Wellesley, Massachusetts.\nIn other earnings news, Microsoft Corp ended down 0.1% even as a boom in cloud services helped it beat Wall Street expectations for revenue and earnings.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 9.86 billion shares, compared with a similar average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.85-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.61-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 42 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 44 new highs and 67 new lows.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.9,"ESmain":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"OEX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"IVV":0.9,"SH":0.9,"SPY":0.9,"SSO":0.9,"SPXU":0.9,"UPRO":0.9,"SDS":0.9,"OEF":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":666,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}