文氏的个人主页 - 老虎社区

文氏

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

31关注

2粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-04-22

Ohhh good explanation

3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound<blockquote>3只处于重要支撑位并可能反弹的电动汽车股票</blockquote>

2021-04-07

Yay!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-28

Hmmm food for thought

5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street<blockquote>华尔街称5只超受欢迎的成长型股票，上涨空间为28%至56%</blockquote>

2021-05-14

Informative read

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-12

Red.....

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-11

[流泪]

Should We Fear, Inflation Is Here<blockquote>我们应该害怕吗，通货膨胀来了</blockquote>

2021-05-05

Omg

"It Could Get Weird": Stocks Puke As "Extreme" Negative Gamma Strikes<blockquote>“事情可能会变得奇怪”：随着“极端”负面伽马来袭，股市呕吐</blockquote>

2021-05-04

Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-14

Stuck

The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively<blockquote>上两次股市分别下跌了20%和50%</blockquote>

2021-05-11

Oh mannnn..worrying

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3576837088119232","uuid":"3576837088119232","gmtCreate":1613743291013,"gmtModify":1619000981432,"name":"文氏","pinyin":"wswenshi","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":31,"tweetSize":24,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.09","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.69%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":198319589,"gmtCreate":1620925209241,"gmtModify":1634195230163,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stuck","listText":"Stuck","text":"Stuck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/198319589","repostId":"1196862271","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196862271","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620919313,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1196862271?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-13 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively<blockquote>上两次股市分别下跌了20%和50%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196862271","media":"zerohedge","summary":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a","content":"<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.</p><p><blockquote>在我们的上一篇文章中，我概述了通胀上升如何导致科技股下跌。</blockquote></p><p> By way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.</p><p><blockquote>快速回顾一下，以纳斯达克为代表的科技股对通胀高度敏感，呈反比关系：当通胀上升时，科技股暴跌，当通胀下降时，科技股飙升。</blockquote></p><p> The reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.</p><p><blockquote>原因是大部分科技投资都是基于增长率。如果债券收益率因通货膨胀而上升，债券作为一种投资就会变得更具吸引力，从而削弱科技的吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> As I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).</p><p><blockquote>正如我昨天提到的。随着通胀在2020年进入金融体系并在2021年开始加速，科技股陷入困境。您可以在下面的图表中看到这一点（红色矩形）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6366a605a86374ef9af9de07ae828fd4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"606\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">So, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&amp;P 500? Will it collapse too?</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们知道，随着通胀升温，科技将难以前进。但是像标普500这样的大盘呢？它也会崩溃吗？</blockquote></p><p> To figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>为了弄清楚这一点，让我们来看看美国最近两次通胀恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> The most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.</p><p><blockquote>最近一次恐慌发生在2010-2011年。当时，美联储很快就采取了行动，并决定结束其QE 2计划（通胀飙升的原因）。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.</p><p><blockquote>美联储随后等待了几个月才推出任何新的货币计划。当它真的推出时，它并不涉及印钞（相反，美联储通过一个名为“扭曲操作”的过程使用国债销售收益购买长期国债）。这是一种隐形收紧。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.</p><p><blockquote>股市不喜欢这样，暴跌近20%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fdf95bc30276d330c4bd7a5f62b10d2\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Bear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.</p><p><blockquote>请记住，这是一次相对较小的通胀恐慌。在20世纪70-80年代最后一次合理的通胀风暴期间。</blockquote></p><p> During that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).</p><p><blockquote>在这场混乱中，美联储被迫更加积极地收紧货币政策，启动了两项激进的紧缩计划。值得注意的是，这引发了两次严重的衰退（阴影区域）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f6ed1ada17beb2066d0017b576e64cc\" tg-width=\"1168\" tg-height=\"450\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> This IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b38c35b81a872044b03ce49014d5e46\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote>这导致股市崩溃，导致18个月内下跌约50%。</blockquote></p><p> So, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?</p><p><blockquote>那么，这次会是什么呢？美联储会像2011年那样进行秘密缩减……还是会像上世纪七八十年代那样大幅收紧货币政策？</blockquote></p><p> We’ll address that in our next article.</p><p><blockquote>我们将在下一篇文章中讨论这个问题。</blockquote></p><p> in the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation&nbsp;<b>pay you</b>&nbsp;as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，我们刚刚发布了一份特别投资报告，内容涉及可以用来制造通货膨胀的五种秘密投资<b>付给你</b>随着它在未来几个月席卷金融体系。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively<blockquote>上两次股市分别下跌了20%和50%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively<blockquote>上两次股市分别下跌了20%和50%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-13 23:21</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.</p><p><blockquote>在我们的上一篇文章中，我概述了通胀上升如何导致科技股下跌。</blockquote></p><p> By way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.</p><p><blockquote>快速回顾一下，以纳斯达克为代表的科技股对通胀高度敏感，呈反比关系：当通胀上升时，科技股暴跌，当通胀下降时，科技股飙升。</blockquote></p><p> The reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.</p><p><blockquote>原因是大部分科技投资都是基于增长率。如果债券收益率因通货膨胀而上升，债券作为一种投资就会变得更具吸引力，从而削弱科技的吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> As I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).</p><p><blockquote>正如我昨天提到的。随着通胀在2020年进入金融体系并在2021年开始加速，科技股陷入困境。您可以在下面的图表中看到这一点（红色矩形）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6366a605a86374ef9af9de07ae828fd4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"606\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">So, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&amp;P 500? Will it collapse too?</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们知道，随着通胀升温，科技将难以前进。但是像标普500这样的大盘呢？它也会崩溃吗？</blockquote></p><p> To figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>为了弄清楚这一点，让我们来看看美国最近两次通胀恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> The most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.</p><p><blockquote>最近一次恐慌发生在2010-2011年。当时，美联储很快就采取了行动，并决定结束其QE 2计划（通胀飙升的原因）。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.</p><p><blockquote>美联储随后等待了几个月才推出任何新的货币计划。当它真的推出时，它并不涉及印钞（相反，美联储通过一个名为“扭曲操作”的过程使用国债销售收益购买长期国债）。这是一种隐形收紧。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.</p><p><blockquote>股市不喜欢这样，暴跌近20%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fdf95bc30276d330c4bd7a5f62b10d2\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Bear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.</p><p><blockquote>请记住，这是一次相对较小的通胀恐慌。在20世纪70-80年代最后一次合理的通胀风暴期间。</blockquote></p><p> During that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).</p><p><blockquote>在这场混乱中，美联储被迫更加积极地收紧货币政策，启动了两项激进的紧缩计划。值得注意的是，这引发了两次严重的衰退（阴影区域）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f6ed1ada17beb2066d0017b576e64cc\" tg-width=\"1168\" tg-height=\"450\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> This IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b38c35b81a872044b03ce49014d5e46\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote>这导致股市崩溃，导致18个月内下跌约50%。</blockquote></p><p> So, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?</p><p><blockquote>那么，这次会是什么呢？美联储会像2011年那样进行秘密缩减……还是会像上世纪七八十年代那样大幅收紧货币政策？</blockquote></p><p> We’ll address that in our next article.</p><p><blockquote>我们将在下一篇文章中讨论这个问题。</blockquote></p><p> in the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation&nbsp;<b>pay you</b>&nbsp;as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，我们刚刚发布了一份特别投资报告，内容涉及可以用来制造通货膨胀的五种秘密投资<b>付给你</b>随着它在未来几个月席卷金融体系。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196862271","content_text":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.\nThe reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.\nAs I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).\nSo, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&P 500? Will it collapse too?\nTo figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.\nThe most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.\nThe Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.\nStocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.\n\nBear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.\nDuring that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).\n\nThis IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.\nSo, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?\nWe’ll address that in our next article.\nin the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation pay you as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1577,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198310782,"gmtCreate":1620925137746,"gmtModify":1634195230283,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Informative read","listText":"Informative read","text":"Informative read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/198310782","repostId":"1116555518","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1470,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191915440,"gmtCreate":1620833123680,"gmtModify":1634195961583,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Red.....","listText":"Red.....","text":"Red.....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/191915440","repostId":"1109603661","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3174,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193940199,"gmtCreate":1620747860711,"gmtModify":1634196609527,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[流泪]&nbsp;","listText":"[流泪]&nbsp;","text":"[流泪]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193940199","repostId":"1171091038","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171091038","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620745886,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1171091038?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-11 23:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Should We Fear, Inflation Is Here<blockquote>我们应该害怕吗，通货膨胀来了</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171091038","media":"zerohedge","summary":"It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech in","content":"<p>It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech investors are taking notice with Monday’s Nasdaq 100 slump the largest since mid-March, while China’s producer prices&nbsp;accelerated&nbsp;overnight.&nbsp;VIX futures are higher with broad risk aversion setting up for European equities to catch up to the late downbeat U.S. session.</p><p><blockquote>无论一个人是否是央行行长，都很难忽视通胀压力。科技投资者正在关注周一纳斯达克100指数创下3月中旬以来最大跌幅，而中国生产者价格隔夜加速上涨。VIX期货走高，因欧洲股市普遍避险情绪升温，赶上美国股市尾盘的悲观行情。</blockquote></p><p> At least investor jitters that rising inflation could lift bond yields, and sap equities’ appeal could take comfort from real yields. The 10-year U.S. inflation-adjusted benchmark tumbled to three-month lows, keeping nominal yields in check as breakevens&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;to multi-year highs.</p><p><blockquote>至少投资者担心通胀上升可能会提高债券收益率，而sap股票的吸引力可能会从实际收益率中得到安慰。美国10年期通胀调整基准指数跌至三个月低点，随着盈亏平衡点跃升至多年高点，名义收益率受到抑制。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8047b97c104b947668ce19b34f7fd4a\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"716\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Financial conditions reached another&nbsp;record, while evidence of stocks’ rotation remains: S&amp;P 500 energy and financials advanced over the past 5 sessions, value is outperforming growth –- particularly in&nbsp;Europe&nbsp;-- and the RTY/NDX is well, steady –- much like 10-year nominal yields around 1.60%.</p><p><blockquote>金融状况再创新高，而股票轮动的证据依然存在：标普500能源和金融股在过去5个交易日中上涨，价值跑赢增长——尤其是在欧洲——RTY/NDX表现良好、稳定——就像10年一样-年名义收益率约为1.60%。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. labor market frictions look to be adding to inflation fears, with JOLTs data, a leading indicator of hiring, likely to signal workers’ growing pricing power. And the NFIB small business optimism will be watched today for supply side constraints –- last month, job openings that were “hard to fill” reached at least a four-decade high. Of course, labor market dislocations remain and a handful of Fed speakers today will no doubt look to assuage inflation fears and discount near-term tapering risks. Not like Bill&nbsp;Dudley.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳动力市场摩擦似乎加剧了通胀担忧，JOLTs数据是招聘的领先指标，可能表明工人的定价能力不断增强。NFIB小企业乐观情绪今天将因供应方面的限制而受到关注——上个月，“难以填补”的职位空缺达到了至少四年来的最高水平。当然，劳动力市场的混乱仍然存在，今天的一些美联储发言人无疑会寻求缓解通胀担忧并淡化近期缩减购债规模的风险。不像比尔·达德利。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98df6b5f32251d558127766afc21fad8\" tg-width=\"1257\" tg-height=\"710\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Whether the Fed falls too far behind the curve remains up for debate. Markets, on the other hand, aren’t as comfortable looking through transitory inflation as evidence builds and expectations climb -- that could become a self-fulfilling prophecy after all.</p><p><blockquote>美联储是否落后太多仍有待商榷。另一方面，随着证据的积累和预期的攀升，市场对暂时性通胀的看法并不那么舒服——这毕竟可能成为一个自我实现的预言。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Should We Fear, Inflation Is Here<blockquote>我们应该害怕吗，通货膨胀来了</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShould We Fear, Inflation Is Here<blockquote>我们应该害怕吗，通货膨胀来了</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-11 23:11</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech investors are taking notice with Monday’s Nasdaq 100 slump the largest since mid-March, while China’s producer prices&nbsp;accelerated&nbsp;overnight.&nbsp;VIX futures are higher with broad risk aversion setting up for European equities to catch up to the late downbeat U.S. session.</p><p><blockquote>无论一个人是否是央行行长，都很难忽视通胀压力。科技投资者正在关注周一纳斯达克100指数创下3月中旬以来最大跌幅，而中国生产者价格隔夜加速上涨。VIX期货走高，因欧洲股市普遍避险情绪升温，赶上美国股市尾盘的悲观行情。</blockquote></p><p> At least investor jitters that rising inflation could lift bond yields, and sap equities’ appeal could take comfort from real yields. The 10-year U.S. inflation-adjusted benchmark tumbled to three-month lows, keeping nominal yields in check as breakevens&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;to multi-year highs.</p><p><blockquote>至少投资者担心通胀上升可能会提高债券收益率，而sap股票的吸引力可能会从实际收益率中得到安慰。美国10年期通胀调整基准指数跌至三个月低点，随着盈亏平衡点跃升至多年高点，名义收益率受到抑制。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8047b97c104b947668ce19b34f7fd4a\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"716\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Financial conditions reached another&nbsp;record, while evidence of stocks’ rotation remains: S&amp;P 500 energy and financials advanced over the past 5 sessions, value is outperforming growth –- particularly in&nbsp;Europe&nbsp;-- and the RTY/NDX is well, steady –- much like 10-year nominal yields around 1.60%.</p><p><blockquote>金融状况再创新高，而股票轮动的证据依然存在：标普500能源和金融股在过去5个交易日中上涨，价值跑赢增长——尤其是在欧洲——RTY/NDX表现良好、稳定——就像10年一样-年名义收益率约为1.60%。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. labor market frictions look to be adding to inflation fears, with JOLTs data, a leading indicator of hiring, likely to signal workers’ growing pricing power. And the NFIB small business optimism will be watched today for supply side constraints –- last month, job openings that were “hard to fill” reached at least a four-decade high. Of course, labor market dislocations remain and a handful of Fed speakers today will no doubt look to assuage inflation fears and discount near-term tapering risks. Not like Bill&nbsp;Dudley.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳动力市场摩擦似乎加剧了通胀担忧，JOLTs数据是招聘的领先指标，可能表明工人的定价能力不断增强。NFIB小企业乐观情绪今天将因供应方面的限制而受到关注——上个月，“难以填补”的职位空缺达到了至少四年来的最高水平。当然，劳动力市场的混乱仍然存在，今天的一些美联储发言人无疑会寻求缓解通胀担忧并淡化近期缩减购债规模的风险。不像比尔·达德利。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98df6b5f32251d558127766afc21fad8\" tg-width=\"1257\" tg-height=\"710\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Whether the Fed falls too far behind the curve remains up for debate. Markets, on the other hand, aren’t as comfortable looking through transitory inflation as evidence builds and expectations climb -- that could become a self-fulfilling prophecy after all.</p><p><blockquote>美联储是否落后太多仍有待商榷。另一方面，随着证据的积累和预期的攀升，市场对暂时性通胀的看法并不那么舒服——这毕竟可能成为一个自我实现的预言。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/should-we-fear-inflation-here\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/should-we-fear-inflation-here","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171091038","content_text":"It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech investors are taking notice with Monday’s Nasdaq 100 slump the largest since mid-March, while China’s producer prices accelerated overnight. VIX futures are higher with broad risk aversion setting up for European equities to catch up to the late downbeat U.S. session.\nAt least investor jitters that rising inflation could lift bond yields, and sap equities’ appeal could take comfort from real yields. The 10-year U.S. inflation-adjusted benchmark tumbled to three-month lows, keeping nominal yields in check as breakevens jumped to multi-year highs.\n\nFinancial conditions reached another record, while evidence of stocks’ rotation remains: S&P 500 energy and financials advanced over the past 5 sessions, value is outperforming growth –- particularly in Europe -- and the RTY/NDX is well, steady –- much like 10-year nominal yields around 1.60%.\nU.S. labor market frictions look to be adding to inflation fears, with JOLTs data, a leading indicator of hiring, likely to signal workers’ growing pricing power. And the NFIB small business optimism will be watched today for supply side constraints –- last month, job openings that were “hard to fill” reached at least a four-decade high. Of course, labor market dislocations remain and a handful of Fed speakers today will no doubt look to assuage inflation fears and discount near-term tapering risks. Not like Bill Dudley.\n\nWhether the Fed falls too far behind the curve remains up for debate. Markets, on the other hand, aren’t as comfortable looking through transitory inflation as evidence builds and expectations climb -- that could become a self-fulfilling prophecy after all.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1935,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":193954396,"gmtCreate":1620747711515,"gmtModify":1634196610941,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","listText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","text":"Oh mannnn..worrying","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193954396","repostId":"1185197052","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1902,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106713766,"gmtCreate":1620144803055,"gmtModify":1634207457329,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Not surprising","listText":"Not surprising","text":"Not surprising","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106713766","repostId":"1174922086","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1670,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106713370,"gmtCreate":1620144731590,"gmtModify":1634207457908,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Omg&nbsp;","listText":"Omg&nbsp;","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106713370","repostId":"1195636027","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195636027","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620137110,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1195636027?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-04 22:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes<blockquote>“事情可能会变得奇怪”：随着“极端”负面伽马来袭，股市呕吐</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195636027","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking d","content":"<p>Just like late February when we had the first<i>inflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,</i>Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.</p><p><blockquote>就像二月下旬我们第一次<i>通胀恐慌兼财政部发脾气，</i>科技正在崩溃，只要看看亚马逊就能找到证据。</blockquote></p><p> In just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.</p><p><blockquote>自公布井喷的第一季度收益使其股价创下历史新高以来的短短三天内，亚马逊股价已下跌超过9%，并处于调整的边缘。其他FAAMG，尤其是苹果，其季度表现同样令人印象深刻，但情况也好不到哪里去。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c89d66b1ced8ac68b5fb3ff40b54f134\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"240\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> However, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与2月底科技股主要因收益率大幅飙升而遭受重创不同，这一次出现了深度负伽马的双重打击。</blockquote></p><p> AsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY &amp; QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"</p><p><blockquote>AsSpotGamma隔夜写道：“SPDR标普500指数ETF和QQQ均仍处于负伽马区域，这意味着相对波动性较高。”</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has<b>\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"</b>The details:</p><p><blockquote>野村证券的x-asset常驻专家Chalie McElligott指出了这一点，并在今天早上的一份报告中写道，虽然“没有什么东西本身非常庞大或‘鲸鱼般’”，但有<b>“最近几周，客户的成交量/伽马销量有所回升。”</b>详细信息：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>This has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…<b>all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&amp;P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200</b></li>  <li>The %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,<b>Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile</b></li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dbb4e73ce8bc66785a7aa43170b3dc3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"648\">Needless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,<b>we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well</b>(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>这通过单打和指数中的标准覆盖流得到了体现，也通过上周媒体中提到的系统性扼杀抛售得到了体现（这看起来像是每周交易约3-4倍的比率的奇数流，同时也有例如，一个月内单独的每日覆盖程序跨越）……<b>所有这些都导致了交易商的“长伽马”动态——因此标准普尔指数“停滞”了大约三周，围绕4150-4200点的大罢工的严重性</b></li><li>在最近到期后，整个美国股票指数的整体$伽马幅度的%ile排名已经下降（SPX/SPDR标普500指数ETF合并现在为56.6%ile$伽马/IWM 35.9%ile；EEM 37.4%ile）；然而，<b>纳斯达克/QQQ仍然是广泛指数走势可能变得奇怪的中心，其伽马值为-4.358亿美元，极负，仅为3.8%</b></li></ul>不用说，负面的QQQ gamma+科技抛售=爆炸性组合，正如McElligott总结的那样，“随着QQQ中这种‘极端’的负面$Gamma，<b>我们看到交易商也越来越多地进入“空头伽马vs现货”领域</b>（伽马“中性线”339.36 vs现货333.55）；同样，我们目前在IWM（226.19“中性线”vs 224.79现货）和EEM（54.29“中性线”vs现货53.59）中也看到交易商“做空Gamma vs现货”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7be1b134edacd8fc5831a10f026c1d2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"311\">Tech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"</p><p><blockquote>科技股无法突破走高削弱了市场情绪，正如野村量化总结的那样，继4月份科技股强劲复苏和“长期增长”（得益于UST的稳定和相对“牛市趋于平缓”）3月份利率抛售/“熊市加剧”的极端情况）“我们的野村行业情绪分析显示，哇，我们看到科技行业情绪（再次）崩溃——一周前ile得分为85.1%，但今天降至53.9%”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/938a77b986fc7fbbd0450254e29b7dce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"277\">And as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...</p><p><blockquote>随着对科技的厌恶蔓延，拖累纳斯达克走低……</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35406354f6f369f0aa382d819a26ea4e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"260\">... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&amp;P and Russell...</p><p><blockquote>...它开始冲击更广泛的指数，例如S&amp;P和罗素...</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d50bd11171fa55adf45caf3cf0ab389\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"285\">... which just dipped below its 50dma.</p><p><blockquote>...刚刚跌破50日均线。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b8200d703a1c2d305811eadd35af3c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"227\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes<blockquote>“事情可能会变得奇怪”：随着“极端”负面伽马来袭，股市呕吐</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes<blockquote>“事情可能会变得奇怪”：随着“极端”负面伽马来袭，股市呕吐</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-04 22:05</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Just like late February when we had the first<i>inflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,</i>Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.</p><p><blockquote>就像二月下旬我们第一次<i>通胀恐慌兼财政部发脾气，</i>科技正在崩溃，只要看看亚马逊就能找到证据。</blockquote></p><p> In just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.</p><p><blockquote>自公布井喷的第一季度收益使其股价创下历史新高以来的短短三天内，亚马逊股价已下跌超过9%，并处于调整的边缘。其他FAAMG，尤其是苹果，其季度表现同样令人印象深刻，但情况也好不到哪里去。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c89d66b1ced8ac68b5fb3ff40b54f134\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"240\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> However, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与2月底科技股主要因收益率大幅飙升而遭受重创不同，这一次出现了深度负伽马的双重打击。</blockquote></p><p> AsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY &amp; QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"</p><p><blockquote>AsSpotGamma隔夜写道：“SPDR标普500指数ETF和QQQ均仍处于负伽马区域，这意味着相对波动性较高。”</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has<b>\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"</b>The details:</p><p><blockquote>野村证券的x-asset常驻专家Chalie McElligott指出了这一点，并在今天早上的一份报告中写道，虽然“没有什么东西本身非常庞大或‘鲸鱼般’”，但有<b>“最近几周，客户的成交量/伽马销量有所回升。”</b>详细信息：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>This has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…<b>all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&amp;P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200</b></li>  <li>The %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,<b>Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile</b></li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dbb4e73ce8bc66785a7aa43170b3dc3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"648\">Needless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,<b>we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well</b>(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>这通过单打和指数中的标准覆盖流得到了体现，也通过上周媒体中提到的系统性扼杀抛售得到了体现（这看起来像是每周交易约3-4倍的比率的奇数流，同时也有例如，一个月内单独的每日覆盖程序跨越）……<b>所有这些都导致了交易商的“长伽马”动态——因此标准普尔指数“停滞”了大约三周，围绕4150-4200点的大罢工的严重性</b></li><li>在最近到期后，整个美国股票指数的整体$伽马幅度的%ile排名已经下降（SPX/SPDR标普500指数ETF合并现在为56.6%ile$伽马/IWM 35.9%ile；EEM 37.4%ile）；然而，<b>纳斯达克/QQQ仍然是广泛指数走势可能变得奇怪的中心，其伽马值为-4.358亿美元，极负，仅为3.8%</b></li></ul>不用说，负面的QQQ gamma+科技抛售=爆炸性组合，正如McElligott总结的那样，“随着QQQ中这种‘极端’的负面$Gamma，<b>我们看到交易商也越来越多地进入“空头伽马vs现货”领域</b>（伽马“中性线”339.36 vs现货333.55）；同样，我们目前在IWM（226.19“中性线”vs 224.79现货）和EEM（54.29“中性线”vs现货53.59）中也看到交易商“做空Gamma vs现货”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7be1b134edacd8fc5831a10f026c1d2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"311\">Tech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"</p><p><blockquote>科技股无法突破走高削弱了市场情绪，正如野村量化总结的那样，继4月份科技股强劲复苏和“长期增长”（得益于UST的稳定和相对“牛市趋于平缓”）3月份利率抛售/“熊市加剧”的极端情况）“我们的野村行业情绪分析显示，哇，我们看到科技行业情绪（再次）崩溃——一周前ile得分为85.1%，但今天降至53.9%”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/938a77b986fc7fbbd0450254e29b7dce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"277\">And as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...</p><p><blockquote>随着对科技的厌恶蔓延，拖累纳斯达克走低……</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35406354f6f369f0aa382d819a26ea4e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"260\">... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&amp;P and Russell...</p><p><blockquote>...它开始冲击更广泛的指数，例如S&amp;P和罗素...</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d50bd11171fa55adf45caf3cf0ab389\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"285\">... which just dipped below its 50dma.</p><p><blockquote>...刚刚跌破50日均线。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b8200d703a1c2d305811eadd35af3c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"227\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195636027","content_text":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.\nIn just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.\n\nHowever, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.\nAsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY & QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"\nNomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"The details:\n\nThis has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200\nThe %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile\n\nNeedless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"\nTech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"\nAnd as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...\n... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&P and Russell...\n... which just dipped below its 50dma.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1471,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106706972,"gmtCreate":1620142856796,"gmtModify":1634207477613,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I'm not so sure","listText":"I'm not so sure","text":"I'm not so sure","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106706972","repostId":"2132178325","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1736,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106708147,"gmtCreate":1620142797889,"gmtModify":1634207478322,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","listText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","text":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106708147","repostId":"1142616846","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2840,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106703402,"gmtCreate":1620142691606,"gmtModify":1634207479528,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ahhh..","listText":"Ahhh..","text":"Ahhh..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106703402","repostId":"1107772617","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107772617","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620139709,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107772617?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-04 22:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds<blockquote>观点：为什么你应该担心新现金涌入美国股票基金</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107772617","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from inv","content":"<p><b>With investments, popular is not better.</b>U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.</p><p><blockquote><b>有了投资，受欢迎并不是更好。</b>美国股票基金现在正从投资者那里获得大量新现金——这并不是一个看涨的迹象。</blockquote></p><p>Many investors might see this differently — that a huge influx of cash is positive. In fact, fund flows are a contrarian indicator: the U.S. stock market in the past has performed better when there is a net outflow of cash.</p><p><blockquote>许多投资者可能会有不同的看法——大量现金流入是积极的。事实上，资金流动是一个逆向指标：过去美国股市在现金净流出时表现更好。</blockquote></p><p>The evidence is summarized in the chart below, which plots net inflows of cash to U.S. stock funds (both open-end and exchange-traded funds) by year over the past decade. Notice that in all but two of the years since 2010 there have been net outflows.</p><p><blockquote>下图总结了证据，该图绘制了过去十年中每年流入美国股票基金（开放式基金和交易所交易基金）的现金净额。请注意，自2010年以来，除了两年之外，所有年份都有净流出。</blockquote></p><p><b>Reversal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>逆转</b></blockquote></p><p>Net flows into U.S. equity (open-endded funds and ETF), in billions</p><p><blockquote>流入美国股票（开放式基金和ETF）的净流量，单位：十亿</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c9c4ef1e3533acd3d248af32cdf728f\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>This 2010-2020 period was extremely strong for U.S. stocks. Yet over this time U.S. stock funds experienced a net outflow of $741 billion. (Data are from TrimTabs, a part of EPFR, a division of Informa Financial Intelligence.)</p><p><blockquote>2010年至2020年期间，美国股市表现极其强劲。然而，在此期间，美国股票基金经历了7410亿美元的净流出。（数据来自TrimTabs，EPFR是Informa Financial Intelligence的一个部门。）</blockquote></p><p>This year so far is seeing a major reversal of this longer-term trend. For the first four months of this year, according to TrimTabs, U.S. equity funds have received net inflows of $142.3 billion. If this pace were to continue for the full year, there would be $427 billion of net inflows in 2021 — retracing more than half the total outflow from 2010 through 2020.</p><p><blockquote>今年到目前为止，这一长期趋势发生了重大逆转。根据TrimTabs的数据，今年前四个月，美国股票基金获得了1423亿美元的净流入。如果这一速度持续全年，2021年将有4270亿美元的净流入——追溯到2010年至2020年总流出的一半以上。</blockquote></p><p>One study that puts this huge year-to-date inflow in a bearish light appeared last December in the Review of Finance. Entitled “ETF Arbitrage, Non-Fundamental Demand, and Return Predictability,” the study was conducted by David Brown of the University of Arizona, Shaun William Davies of the University of Colorado Boulder and Matthew Ringgenberg of the University of Utah. The researchers found that, on average, the ETFs with the biggest outflows outperformed the ETFs with the biggest inflows for up to a year after these extreme flows.</p><p><blockquote>去年12月的《金融评论》上发表了一项研究，对今年迄今为止的巨额资金流入持悲观态度。这项名为“ETF套利、非基本面需求和回报可预测性”的研究由亚利桑那大学的David Brown、科罗拉多大学博尔德分校的Shaun William Davies和犹他大学的Matthew Ringgenberg进行。研究人员发现，平均而言，在这些极端资金流动后的一年内，流出最多的ETF的表现优于流入最多的ETF。</blockquote></p><p>Another academic study that reached a similar conclusion has been circulating since January. Entitled “Competition for Attention in the ETF Space,” the study was conducted by Itzhak Ben-David and Byungwook Kim of Ohio State University, Francesco Franzoni of the University of Lugano in Switzerland and Rabih Moussawi of Villanova University. The researchers focused on the specialized ETFs that are created to capitalize on investor fads and market trends, and which typically receive a big influx of cash soon after launch. They found that these ETFs over their first five years after launch lag the market on a risk-adjusted basis by 5% per year on average.</p><p><blockquote>另一项得出类似结论的学术研究自一月份以来一直在流传。这项名为“ETF领域注意力的竞争”的研究由俄亥俄州立大学的Itzhak Ben-David和Byungwook Kim、瑞士卢加诺大学的Francesco Franzoni和维拉诺瓦大学的Rabih Moussawi进行。研究人员重点关注专门的ETF，这些ETF是为了利用投资者时尚和市场趋势而创建的，通常在推出后不久就会获得大量现金流入。他们发现，这些ETF在推出后的前五年，经风险调整后平均每年落后市场5%。</blockquote></p><p>The tenuous relationship between performance and fund flows is evident also in the accompanying tables. The first lists the 10 ETFs with the best year-to-date returns. The second table lists the 10 ETFs with the largest net inflows. (Return data are from FactSet; flow data are from CFRA Research).</p><p><blockquote>业绩和资金流动之间的微妙关系也在附表中显而易见。第一个列出了年初至今回报最好的10只ETF。第二张表列出了净流入最多的10只ETF。（返回数据来自FactSet；流量数据来自CFRA研究）。</blockquote></p><p>Notice that none of the funds in the first table appears in the second.</p><p><blockquote>请注意，第一个表中的基金都没有出现在第二个表中。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2e0354f1f5c9cfd5611c3f6e03c3cee\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"497\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5cd98cfa89435ba9ae4a0bfdedd3891\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"447\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds<blockquote>观点：为什么你应该担心新现金涌入美国股票基金</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds<blockquote>观点：为什么你应该担心新现金涌入美国股票基金</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-04 22:48</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>With investments, popular is not better.</b>U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.</p><p><blockquote><b>有了投资，受欢迎并不是更好。</b>美国股票基金现在正从投资者那里获得大量新现金——这并不是一个看涨的迹象。</blockquote></p><p>Many investors might see this differently — that a huge influx of cash is positive. In fact, fund flows are a contrarian indicator: the U.S. stock market in the past has performed better when there is a net outflow of cash.</p><p><blockquote>许多投资者可能会有不同的看法——大量现金流入是积极的。事实上，资金流动是一个逆向指标：过去美国股市在现金净流出时表现更好。</blockquote></p><p>The evidence is summarized in the chart below, which plots net inflows of cash to U.S. stock funds (both open-end and exchange-traded funds) by year over the past decade. Notice that in all but two of the years since 2010 there have been net outflows.</p><p><blockquote>下图总结了证据，该图绘制了过去十年中每年流入美国股票基金（开放式基金和交易所交易基金）的现金净额。请注意，自2010年以来，除了两年之外，所有年份都有净流出。</blockquote></p><p><b>Reversal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>逆转</b></blockquote></p><p>Net flows into U.S. equity (open-endded funds and ETF), in billions</p><p><blockquote>流入美国股票（开放式基金和ETF）的净流量，单位：十亿</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c9c4ef1e3533acd3d248af32cdf728f\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>This 2010-2020 period was extremely strong for U.S. stocks. Yet over this time U.S. stock funds experienced a net outflow of $741 billion. (Data are from TrimTabs, a part of EPFR, a division of Informa Financial Intelligence.)</p><p><blockquote>2010年至2020年期间，美国股市表现极其强劲。然而，在此期间，美国股票基金经历了7410亿美元的净流出。（数据来自TrimTabs，EPFR是Informa Financial Intelligence的一个部门。）</blockquote></p><p>This year so far is seeing a major reversal of this longer-term trend. For the first four months of this year, according to TrimTabs, U.S. equity funds have received net inflows of $142.3 billion. If this pace were to continue for the full year, there would be $427 billion of net inflows in 2021 — retracing more than half the total outflow from 2010 through 2020.</p><p><blockquote>今年到目前为止，这一长期趋势发生了重大逆转。根据TrimTabs的数据，今年前四个月，美国股票基金获得了1423亿美元的净流入。如果这一速度持续全年，2021年将有4270亿美元的净流入——追溯到2010年至2020年总流出的一半以上。</blockquote></p><p>One study that puts this huge year-to-date inflow in a bearish light appeared last December in the Review of Finance. Entitled “ETF Arbitrage, Non-Fundamental Demand, and Return Predictability,” the study was conducted by David Brown of the University of Arizona, Shaun William Davies of the University of Colorado Boulder and Matthew Ringgenberg of the University of Utah. The researchers found that, on average, the ETFs with the biggest outflows outperformed the ETFs with the biggest inflows for up to a year after these extreme flows.</p><p><blockquote>去年12月的《金融评论》上发表了一项研究，对今年迄今为止的巨额资金流入持悲观态度。这项名为“ETF套利、非基本面需求和回报可预测性”的研究由亚利桑那大学的David Brown、科罗拉多大学博尔德分校的Shaun William Davies和犹他大学的Matthew Ringgenberg进行。研究人员发现，平均而言，在这些极端资金流动后的一年内，流出最多的ETF的表现优于流入最多的ETF。</blockquote></p><p>Another academic study that reached a similar conclusion has been circulating since January. Entitled “Competition for Attention in the ETF Space,” the study was conducted by Itzhak Ben-David and Byungwook Kim of Ohio State University, Francesco Franzoni of the University of Lugano in Switzerland and Rabih Moussawi of Villanova University. The researchers focused on the specialized ETFs that are created to capitalize on investor fads and market trends, and which typically receive a big influx of cash soon after launch. They found that these ETFs over their first five years after launch lag the market on a risk-adjusted basis by 5% per year on average.</p><p><blockquote>另一项得出类似结论的学术研究自一月份以来一直在流传。这项名为“ETF领域注意力的竞争”的研究由俄亥俄州立大学的Itzhak Ben-David和Byungwook Kim、瑞士卢加诺大学的Francesco Franzoni和维拉诺瓦大学的Rabih Moussawi进行。研究人员重点关注专门的ETF，这些ETF是为了利用投资者时尚和市场趋势而创建的，通常在推出后不久就会获得大量现金流入。他们发现，这些ETF在推出后的前五年，经风险调整后平均每年落后市场5%。</blockquote></p><p>The tenuous relationship between performance and fund flows is evident also in the accompanying tables. The first lists the 10 ETFs with the best year-to-date returns. The second table lists the 10 ETFs with the largest net inflows. (Return data are from FactSet; flow data are from CFRA Research).</p><p><blockquote>业绩和资金流动之间的微妙关系也在附表中显而易见。第一个列出了年初至今回报最好的10只ETF。第二张表列出了净流入最多的10只ETF。（返回数据来自FactSet；流量数据来自CFRA研究）。</blockquote></p><p>Notice that none of the funds in the first table appears in the second.</p><p><blockquote>请注意，第一个表中的基金都没有出现在第二个表中。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2e0354f1f5c9cfd5611c3f6e03c3cee\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"497\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5cd98cfa89435ba9ae4a0bfdedd3891\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"447\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107772617","content_text":"With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.Many investors might see this differently — that a huge influx of cash is positive. In fact, fund flows are a contrarian indicator: the U.S. stock market in the past has performed better when there is a net outflow of cash.The evidence is summarized in the chart below, which plots net inflows of cash to U.S. stock funds (both open-end and exchange-traded funds) by year over the past decade. Notice that in all but two of the years since 2010 there have been net outflows.ReversalNet flows into U.S. equity (open-endded funds and ETF), in billionsThis 2010-2020 period was extremely strong for U.S. stocks. Yet over this time U.S. stock funds experienced a net outflow of $741 billion. (Data are from TrimTabs, a part of EPFR, a division of Informa Financial Intelligence.)This year so far is seeing a major reversal of this longer-term trend. For the first four months of this year, according to TrimTabs, U.S. equity funds have received net inflows of $142.3 billion. If this pace were to continue for the full year, there would be $427 billion of net inflows in 2021 — retracing more than half the total outflow from 2010 through 2020.One study that puts this huge year-to-date inflow in a bearish light appeared last December in the Review of Finance. Entitled “ETF Arbitrage, Non-Fundamental Demand, and Return Predictability,” the study was conducted by David Brown of the University of Arizona, Shaun William Davies of the University of Colorado Boulder and Matthew Ringgenberg of the University of Utah. The researchers found that, on average, the ETFs with the biggest outflows outperformed the ETFs with the biggest inflows for up to a year after these extreme flows.Another academic study that reached a similar conclusion has been circulating since January. Entitled “Competition for Attention in the ETF Space,” the study was conducted by Itzhak Ben-David and Byungwook Kim of Ohio State University, Francesco Franzoni of the University of Lugano in Switzerland and Rabih Moussawi of Villanova University. The researchers focused on the specialized ETFs that are created to capitalize on investor fads and market trends, and which typically receive a big influx of cash soon after launch. They found that these ETFs over their first five years after launch lag the market on a risk-adjusted basis by 5% per year on average.The tenuous relationship between performance and fund flows is evident also in the accompanying tables. The first lists the 10 ETFs with the best year-to-date returns. The second table lists the 10 ETFs with the largest net inflows. (Return data are from FactSet; flow data are from CFRA Research).Notice that none of the funds in the first table appears in the second.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1751,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":103586892,"gmtCreate":1619793444716,"gmtModify":1634209876745,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes!","listText":"Yes!","text":"Yes!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/103586892","repostId":"1142070002","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142070002","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1619792975,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1142070002?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-30 22:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before<blockquote>蔚来涨超5%，此前跌近4%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142070002","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.NIO  is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.NIO lost 23 cents a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales.","content":"<p>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来涨超5%，此前跌近4%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80881ae9e6de48ac5e3733583db3ba9e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来的盈利看起来很像福特。知道什么。</b></blockquote></p><p>Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商蔚来公布的第一季度业绩好于预期。但全球汽车微芯片短缺将在未来几个月影响生产。</blockquote></p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来（股票代码：蔚来）是一只高估值、高增长的股票。现在，看多蔚来的人必须决定稳健的盈利是否会战胜增长问题，或者芯片短缺是否会从长远来看损害该公司。</blockquote></p><p>NIO lost&nbsp;23 cents&nbsp;a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.</p><p><blockquote>按调整后的非公认会计准则计算，蔚来的销售额为12亿美元，每股亏损23美分。华尔街预计11亿美元的销售额将损失84美分。蔚来的企业毛利率为19.5%，比分析师预期高出约3个百分点，高于一年前的负12%。第一季度业绩看起来很稳健。</blockquote></p><p>The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose about&nbsp; 0.7%.</p><p><blockquote>但该股没有变动。蔚来于下午5:30公布了数据。东部时间，盘后交易的股票并不多。蔚来股价周四收盘下跌5.3%。标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约0.7%。</blockquote></p><p>“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”</p><p><blockquote>首席执行官William Bin Li在公司新闻稿中表示：“蔚来以第一季度20,060辆汽车的新季度交付记录开启了2021年。”“对我们产品的整体需求仍然相当强劲，但由于半导体短缺，供应链仍然面临重大挑战。”</blockquote></p><p>Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.</p><p><blockquote>管理层称其电话会议上的芯片形势“非常严峻”，并预计第二季度汽车交付量为21,000至22,000辆，销售额约为13亿美元。华尔街预计销售额为12亿美元。但单位交付指引略低于德意志银行分析师Edison Yu的预期。</blockquote></p><p>For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.</p><p><blockquote>Yu全年的交付量为95,000辆。2021年上半年的交付量可能约为42,000辆，全球芯片短缺的解决将在很大程度上决定蔚来能否达到俞的数字。</blockquote></p><p>Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>Yu将蔚来股票评级为买入，并将该股目标价定为60美元。</blockquote></p><p>The overall quarter feels a little like&nbsp;Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was&nbsp;reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.</p><p><blockquote>整个季度感觉有点像周三公布的福特汽车(F)季度。福特公布的销售额和盈利远好于华尔街的预期。销量低于公司内部预测，但车辆组合的改善推动了销量超出了街头预测。在芯片供应有限的情况下，福特优先生产高端汽车。展望未来，福特表示，芯片短缺的影响将处于该公司最初10亿至25亿美元成本指导的高端。</blockquote></p><p>Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.</p><p><blockquote>周三晚间报告发布后的第二天，福特股价周四收盘下跌9.4%。蔚来第二季度的指引并不像福特那样令人惊讶。蔚来也没有全年指引。但蔚来的股价反应很难预测。</blockquote></p><p>Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>福特的市盈率不到2022年预期市盈率的7倍。蔚来预计将在2022年实现全年盈利。更重要的是，蔚来的价值比福特高出50%左右。</blockquote></p><p>NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place&nbsp;capacity to produce&nbsp;hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来的电话会议在东部时间晚上10点左右结束。芯片短缺后，分析师将问题集中在国内电动汽车竞争和蔚来的扩产上。蔚来正在建立未来几年生产数十万辆汽车的能力。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before<blockquote>蔚来涨超5%，此前跌近4%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before<blockquote>蔚来涨超5%，此前跌近4%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-30 22:29</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来涨超5%，此前跌近4%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80881ae9e6de48ac5e3733583db3ba9e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来的盈利看起来很像福特。知道什么。</b></blockquote></p><p>Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商蔚来公布的第一季度业绩好于预期。但全球汽车微芯片短缺将在未来几个月影响生产。</blockquote></p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来（股票代码：蔚来）是一只高估值、高增长的股票。现在，看多蔚来的人必须决定稳健的盈利是否会战胜增长问题，或者芯片短缺是否会从长远来看损害该公司。</blockquote></p><p>NIO lost&nbsp;23 cents&nbsp;a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.</p><p><blockquote>按调整后的非公认会计准则计算，蔚来的销售额为12亿美元，每股亏损23美分。华尔街预计11亿美元的销售额将损失84美分。蔚来的企业毛利率为19.5%，比分析师预期高出约3个百分点，高于一年前的负12%。第一季度业绩看起来很稳健。</blockquote></p><p>The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose about&nbsp; 0.7%.</p><p><blockquote>但该股没有变动。蔚来于下午5:30公布了数据。东部时间，盘后交易的股票并不多。蔚来股价周四收盘下跌5.3%。标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约0.7%。</blockquote></p><p>“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”</p><p><blockquote>首席执行官William Bin Li在公司新闻稿中表示：“蔚来以第一季度20,060辆汽车的新季度交付记录开启了2021年。”“对我们产品的整体需求仍然相当强劲，但由于半导体短缺，供应链仍然面临重大挑战。”</blockquote></p><p>Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.</p><p><blockquote>管理层称其电话会议上的芯片形势“非常严峻”，并预计第二季度汽车交付量为21,000至22,000辆，销售额约为13亿美元。华尔街预计销售额为12亿美元。但单位交付指引略低于德意志银行分析师Edison Yu的预期。</blockquote></p><p>For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.</p><p><blockquote>Yu全年的交付量为95,000辆。2021年上半年的交付量可能约为42,000辆，全球芯片短缺的解决将在很大程度上决定蔚来能否达到俞的数字。</blockquote></p><p>Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>Yu将蔚来股票评级为买入，并将该股目标价定为60美元。</blockquote></p><p>The overall quarter feels a little like&nbsp;Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was&nbsp;reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.</p><p><blockquote>整个季度感觉有点像周三公布的福特汽车(F)季度。福特公布的销售额和盈利远好于华尔街的预期。销量低于公司内部预测，但车辆组合的改善推动了销量超出了街头预测。在芯片供应有限的情况下，福特优先生产高端汽车。展望未来，福特表示，芯片短缺的影响将处于该公司最初10亿至25亿美元成本指导的高端。</blockquote></p><p>Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.</p><p><blockquote>周三晚间报告发布后的第二天，福特股价周四收盘下跌9.4%。蔚来第二季度的指引并不像福特那样令人惊讶。蔚来也没有全年指引。但蔚来的股价反应很难预测。</blockquote></p><p>Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>福特的市盈率不到2022年预期市盈率的7倍。蔚来预计将在2022年实现全年盈利。更重要的是，蔚来的价值比福特高出50%左右。</blockquote></p><p>NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place&nbsp;capacity to produce&nbsp;hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来的电话会议在东部时间晚上10点左右结束。芯片短缺后，分析师将问题集中在国内电动汽车竞争和蔚来的扩产上。蔚来正在建立未来几年生产数十万辆汽车的能力。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142070002","content_text":"NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.NIO lost 23 cents a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about  0.7%.“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.The overall quarter feels a little like Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place capacity to produce hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":535,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":100673831,"gmtCreate":1619613528223,"gmtModify":1634211348655,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","listText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","text":"Hmmm food for thought","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/100673831","repostId":"1138128459","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138128459","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619608043,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138128459?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-28 19:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street<blockquote>华尔街称5只超受欢迎的成长型股票，上涨空间为28%至56%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138128459","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on M","content":"<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-based<b>S&amp;P 500</b>has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.</p><p><blockquote>13个月来，华尔街几乎势不可挡。自2020年3月23日触及熊市底部以来，宽基<b>标普500</b>在过去的这个周末，股价飙升了87%。这轻松超过了熊市底部的平均反弹反弹，并让基准指数的历史平均年回报率烟消云散。</blockquote></p><p> Yet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.</p><p><blockquote>然而，即使在这些崇高的水平上，华尔街的专业人士也看到了价值。根据华尔街分析师一致的一年价格目标，五只最受欢迎的成长型股票的隐含上涨空间从28%的低点到高达56%不等。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d19c9dd5972bb303415e3fb9e20fb2d4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify: Implied upside of 31%</p><p><blockquote>Shopify：隐含上涨31%</blockquote></p><p> First up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,<b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.</p><p><blockquote>首先是我最喜欢的软件即服务（SaaS）股票，<b>Shopify</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SHOP）。尽管在过去3.5年里上涨了1,000%以上，华尔街认为该公司的股票明年还有31%的上涨空间，达到每股1,434美元。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify为（主要）小型企业提供基于云的电子商务解决方案的运营模式目前再好不过了。尽管Shopify最初与几乎所有其他零售型公司一样受到了疫情的打击，但随着企业改变方向并转向线上，Shopify的电子商务平台很快就会成为合乎逻辑的受益者。结果是2020年其平台交易的商品总值(GMV)增长了96%，达到1196亿美元。过去六年，GMV以77.7%的年复合增长率增长。</blockquote></p><p> What's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes of<b>Walmart</b>&nbsp;and<b>Pinterest</b>to streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify的成功之处在于新商家对该平台的发现以及与主要零售商达成有价值交易的能力。去年使用该平台的消费者数量增长了约52%，达到4.57亿。与此同时，它与<b>沃尔玛</b>和<b>Pinterest</b>简化他们在线销售平台的各个方面。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify从根本上来说并不便宜。但如果它的GMV能够继续以如此疯狂的水平增长，投资者将很乐意支付高额溢价来持有Shopify股票。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df219df7b01fbc2aa008c455f28b99e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Teladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%</p><p><blockquote>Teladoc Health：隐含上涨40%</blockquote></p><p> Telemedicine giant<b>Teladoc Health</b>(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.</p><p><blockquote>远程医疗巨头<b>Teladoc健康</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TDOC）在过去的一年里非常受欢迎，原因显而易见，我稍后会谈到。据华尔街报道，Teladoc的股价在未来12个月内可能会升至250美元以上，隐含上涨空间为40%。</blockquote></p><p> As you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.</p><p><blockquote>可以想象，去年，如果可能的话，医生希望让高危人群和潜在感染患者远离办公室和医院。这导致Teladoc在2020年处理了近1060万次虚拟访问，高于上一年的约410万次。</blockquote></p><p> But understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.</p><p><blockquote>但是要明白，远程医疗是一种改变游戏规则的医疗保健模式，而不仅仅是因为疫情而成为一年的奇迹。这对患者来说要方便得多，允许医生更密切地关注高危患者，而且通常比健康保险公司喜欢的办公室就诊收费更低。这些优势正是Teladoc销售额在2013年至2019年间年均增长74%的原因。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.</p><p><blockquote>此外，可以说，Teladoc还有一个新玩具：它在11月初收购了领先的应用健康信号公司Livongo Health。Livongo依靠人工智能向慢性病患者发送提示和提示。这些轻推帮助患者改变行为，从而过上更健康的生活。Livongo的加入使Teladoc成为名副其实的理所当然的购买对象。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e47e6b6eced3a10e200ffd777619a0c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake: Implied upside of 28%</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake：隐含上涨28%</blockquote></p><p> Another high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing company<b>Snowflake</b>(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街专业人士认为，另一只上涨空间巨大的高增长股票是云数据仓库公司<b>雪花</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SNOW）。在最近回落至历史低点后，分析师预计Snowflake在未来12个月内将上涨28%，达到每股近301美元。</blockquote></p><p> As I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.</p><p><blockquote>正如我在Shopify中提到的，我们正在见证企业在线和云的大力推动，这对大多数云基础设施公司来说都是一个福音。尽管经历了几十年来最严重的经济衰退，Snowflake在2021财年的产品收入仍增长了120%，达到5.538亿美元。尽管目前损失了很多钱，但随着公司的成熟，Snowflake提供的服务应该会产生丰厚的利润。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Arguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.</p><p><blockquote>可以说，Snowflake最有趣的事情是其可持续的竞争优势。例如，它提供了一种现收现付模式，避免了SaaS股票经常觊觎的订阅。通过允许客户根据他们的存储需求和使用的雪花计算点数付费，它提供了一种高度透明且经济高效的运营模式。</blockquote></p><p> Even better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.</p><p><blockquote>更好的是，它的平台位于最流行的云基础设施解决方案之上，这使得信息共享无缝，无论存储提供商是谁。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake的高估值需要填补一些非常大的空缺，但华尔街相信该公司能够做到这一点。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbafad9e87b7b7dacfefe92d4741b655\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Datadog: Implied upside of 35%</p><p><blockquote>Datadog：隐含上涨35%</blockquote></p><p> Have I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions provider<b>Datadog</b>(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.</p><p><blockquote>我有没有提到华尔街对SaaS股票情有独钟？除了Shopify和Snowflake之外，分析师认为应用监控解决方案提供商<b>Datadog</b>（纳斯达克：DDOG）明年可能飙升至每股121美元。这意味着其股价有高达35%的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> Keeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.</p><p><blockquote>与主题保持一致，Datadog希望从大流行后企业彻底转变战略中受益。随着员工远程工作，企业掌握关键指标、监督关键应用程序并充分了解客户的行为变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。Datadog基于云的解决方案为其客户完成了所有这些工作。</blockquote></p><p> What's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.</p><p><blockquote>Datadog最令人印象深刻的是该公司吸引更大客户的能力。虽然年经常性收入(ARR)至少为100,000美元的客户增加46%是不错的，但令人惊叹的数字是ARR至少为100万美元的客户数量增加了94%。这是该公司2020年销售额猛增66%至6.035亿美元的一个重要原因。</blockquote></p><p> Similar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.</p><p><blockquote>与Snowflake类似，Datadog凭借其高昂的市销率需要证明很多东西。然而，如果它的销售额能够继续以每年30%以上的速度增长，那么华尔街的价格目标就没有理由达不到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99b3853458b2424e2901821012f5502f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Coinbase: Implied upside of 56%</p><p><blockquote>Coinbase：隐含上涨56%</blockquote></p><p> Finally, recent initial public offering<b>Coinbase</b>(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>最后，近期首次公开发行<b>Coinbase</b>（纳斯达克：COIN）在这五家快速增长的公司中提供了最高的上涨空间。尽管上周末只列出了四个目标价，但每股600美元的崇高目标将共识扭曲至每股456美元。这表明Coinbase在未来12个月内可能会上涨56%。</blockquote></p><p> There's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies like<b>Bitcoin</b>and&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!</p><p><blockquote>毫无疑问，Coinbase受益于围绕加密货币的兴奋，例如<b>比特币</b>和<b>以太币</b>.随着今年两者都反弹至新高，Coinbase第一季度营收为18亿美元。在某些情况下，这比过去24个月的收入总和还要多！</blockquote></p><p> However, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与这里列出的其他受欢迎的公司不同，Coinbase的优势充其量看起来很脆弱。它面临着竞争加密货币经纪公司降低其费用的风险，随着时间的推移，这可能会大幅降低其营业利润率和增长率。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria&nbsp;rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.</p><p><blockquote>此外，它的商业模式看起来是建立在兴奋而不是创新之上的。由于其大部分收入来自比特币和以太币交易，当这些关键资产的价格停止上涨时会发生什么令人担忧。在比特币市值损失80%的两年内，Coinbase的收入几乎减半。</blockquote></p><p> In sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.</p><p><blockquote>总而言之，华尔街可能看好Coinbase，但这个傻瓜却不看好。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street<blockquote>华尔街称5只超受欢迎的成长型股票，上涨空间为28%至56%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street<blockquote>华尔街称5只超受欢迎的成长型股票，上涨空间为28%至56%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-28 19:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-based<b>S&amp;P 500</b>has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.</p><p><blockquote>13个月来，华尔街几乎势不可挡。自2020年3月23日触及熊市底部以来，宽基<b>标普500</b>在过去的这个周末，股价飙升了87%。这轻松超过了熊市底部的平均反弹反弹，并让基准指数的历史平均年回报率烟消云散。</blockquote></p><p> Yet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.</p><p><blockquote>然而，即使在这些崇高的水平上，华尔街的专业人士也看到了价值。根据华尔街分析师一致的一年价格目标，五只最受欢迎的成长型股票的隐含上涨空间从28%的低点到高达56%不等。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d19c9dd5972bb303415e3fb9e20fb2d4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify: Implied upside of 31%</p><p><blockquote>Shopify：隐含上涨31%</blockquote></p><p> First up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,<b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.</p><p><blockquote>首先是我最喜欢的软件即服务（SaaS）股票，<b>Shopify</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SHOP）。尽管在过去3.5年里上涨了1,000%以上，华尔街认为该公司的股票明年还有31%的上涨空间，达到每股1,434美元。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify为（主要）小型企业提供基于云的电子商务解决方案的运营模式目前再好不过了。尽管Shopify最初与几乎所有其他零售型公司一样受到了疫情的打击，但随着企业改变方向并转向线上，Shopify的电子商务平台很快就会成为合乎逻辑的受益者。结果是2020年其平台交易的商品总值(GMV)增长了96%，达到1196亿美元。过去六年，GMV以77.7%的年复合增长率增长。</blockquote></p><p> What's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes of<b>Walmart</b>&nbsp;and<b>Pinterest</b>to streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify的成功之处在于新商家对该平台的发现以及与主要零售商达成有价值交易的能力。去年使用该平台的消费者数量增长了约52%，达到4.57亿。与此同时，它与<b>沃尔玛</b>和<b>Pinterest</b>简化他们在线销售平台的各个方面。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify从根本上来说并不便宜。但如果它的GMV能够继续以如此疯狂的水平增长，投资者将很乐意支付高额溢价来持有Shopify股票。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df219df7b01fbc2aa008c455f28b99e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Teladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%</p><p><blockquote>Teladoc Health：隐含上涨40%</blockquote></p><p> Telemedicine giant<b>Teladoc Health</b>(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.</p><p><blockquote>远程医疗巨头<b>Teladoc健康</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TDOC）在过去的一年里非常受欢迎，原因显而易见，我稍后会谈到。据华尔街报道，Teladoc的股价在未来12个月内可能会升至250美元以上，隐含上涨空间为40%。</blockquote></p><p> As you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.</p><p><blockquote>可以想象，去年，如果可能的话，医生希望让高危人群和潜在感染患者远离办公室和医院。这导致Teladoc在2020年处理了近1060万次虚拟访问，高于上一年的约410万次。</blockquote></p><p> But understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.</p><p><blockquote>但是要明白，远程医疗是一种改变游戏规则的医疗保健模式，而不仅仅是因为疫情而成为一年的奇迹。这对患者来说要方便得多，允许医生更密切地关注高危患者，而且通常比健康保险公司喜欢的办公室就诊收费更低。这些优势正是Teladoc销售额在2013年至2019年间年均增长74%的原因。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.</p><p><blockquote>此外，可以说，Teladoc还有一个新玩具：它在11月初收购了领先的应用健康信号公司Livongo Health。Livongo依靠人工智能向慢性病患者发送提示和提示。这些轻推帮助患者改变行为，从而过上更健康的生活。Livongo的加入使Teladoc成为名副其实的理所当然的购买对象。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e47e6b6eced3a10e200ffd777619a0c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake: Implied upside of 28%</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake：隐含上涨28%</blockquote></p><p> Another high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing company<b>Snowflake</b>(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街专业人士认为，另一只上涨空间巨大的高增长股票是云数据仓库公司<b>雪花</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SNOW）。在最近回落至历史低点后，分析师预计Snowflake在未来12个月内将上涨28%，达到每股近301美元。</blockquote></p><p> As I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.</p><p><blockquote>正如我在Shopify中提到的，我们正在见证企业在线和云的大力推动，这对大多数云基础设施公司来说都是一个福音。尽管经历了几十年来最严重的经济衰退，Snowflake在2021财年的产品收入仍增长了120%，达到5.538亿美元。尽管目前损失了很多钱，但随着公司的成熟，Snowflake提供的服务应该会产生丰厚的利润。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Arguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.</p><p><blockquote>可以说，Snowflake最有趣的事情是其可持续的竞争优势。例如，它提供了一种现收现付模式，避免了SaaS股票经常觊觎的订阅。通过允许客户根据他们的存储需求和使用的雪花计算点数付费，它提供了一种高度透明且经济高效的运营模式。</blockquote></p><p> Even better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.</p><p><blockquote>更好的是，它的平台位于最流行的云基础设施解决方案之上，这使得信息共享无缝，无论存储提供商是谁。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake的高估值需要填补一些非常大的空缺，但华尔街相信该公司能够做到这一点。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbafad9e87b7b7dacfefe92d4741b655\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Datadog: Implied upside of 35%</p><p><blockquote>Datadog：隐含上涨35%</blockquote></p><p> Have I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions provider<b>Datadog</b>(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.</p><p><blockquote>我有没有提到华尔街对SaaS股票情有独钟？除了Shopify和Snowflake之外，分析师认为应用监控解决方案提供商<b>Datadog</b>（纳斯达克：DDOG）明年可能飙升至每股121美元。这意味着其股价有高达35%的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> Keeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.</p><p><blockquote>与主题保持一致，Datadog希望从大流行后企业彻底转变战略中受益。随着员工远程工作，企业掌握关键指标、监督关键应用程序并充分了解客户的行为变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。Datadog基于云的解决方案为其客户完成了所有这些工作。</blockquote></p><p> What's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.</p><p><blockquote>Datadog最令人印象深刻的是该公司吸引更大客户的能力。虽然年经常性收入(ARR)至少为100,000美元的客户增加46%是不错的，但令人惊叹的数字是ARR至少为100万美元的客户数量增加了94%。这是该公司2020年销售额猛增66%至6.035亿美元的一个重要原因。</blockquote></p><p> Similar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.</p><p><blockquote>与Snowflake类似，Datadog凭借其高昂的市销率需要证明很多东西。然而，如果它的销售额能够继续以每年30%以上的速度增长，那么华尔街的价格目标就没有理由达不到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99b3853458b2424e2901821012f5502f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Coinbase: Implied upside of 56%</p><p><blockquote>Coinbase：隐含上涨56%</blockquote></p><p> Finally, recent initial public offering<b>Coinbase</b>(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>最后，近期首次公开发行<b>Coinbase</b>（纳斯达克：COIN）在这五家快速增长的公司中提供了最高的上涨空间。尽管上周末只列出了四个目标价，但每股600美元的崇高目标将共识扭曲至每股456美元。这表明Coinbase在未来12个月内可能会上涨56%。</blockquote></p><p> There's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies like<b>Bitcoin</b>and&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!</p><p><blockquote>毫无疑问，Coinbase受益于围绕加密货币的兴奋，例如<b>比特币</b>和<b>以太币</b>.随着今年两者都反弹至新高，Coinbase第一季度营收为18亿美元。在某些情况下，这比过去24个月的收入总和还要多！</blockquote></p><p> However, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与这里列出的其他受欢迎的公司不同，Coinbase的优势充其量看起来很脆弱。它面临着竞争加密货币经纪公司降低其费用的风险，随着时间的推移，这可能会大幅降低其营业利润率和增长率。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria&nbsp;rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.</p><p><blockquote>此外，它的商业模式看起来是建立在兴奋而不是创新之上的。由于其大部分收入来自比特币和以太币交易，当这些关键资产的价格停止上涨时会发生什么令人担忧。在比特币市值损失80%的两年内，Coinbase的收入几乎减半。</blockquote></p><p> In sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.</p><p><blockquote>总而言之，华尔街可能看好Coinbase，但这个傻瓜却不看好。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SHOP":"Shopify Inc","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","SNOW":"Snowflake","DDOG":"Datadog","TDOC":"Teladoc Health Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138128459","content_text":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-basedS&P 500has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.\nYet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nShopify: Implied upside of 31%\nFirst up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,Shopify(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.\nShopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.\nWhat's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes ofWalmart andPinterestto streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.\nShopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nTeladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%\nTelemedicine giantTeladoc Health(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.\nAs you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.\nBut understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.\nFurthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nSnowflake: Implied upside of 28%\nAnother high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing companySnowflake(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.\nAs I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.\nArguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.\nEven better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.\nSnowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nDatadog: Implied upside of 35%\nHave I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions providerDatadog(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.\nKeeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.\nWhat's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.\nSimilar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nCoinbase: Implied upside of 56%\nFinally, recent initial public offeringCoinbase(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.\nThere's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies likeBitcoinand Ethereum. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!\nHowever, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.\nFurthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.\nIn sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DDOG":0.9,"TDOC":0.9,"COIN":0.9,"SNOW":0.9,"SHOP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":622,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":377267069,"gmtCreate":1619531257151,"gmtModify":1634212008338,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Upupup","listText":"Upupup","text":"Upupup","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/377267069","repostId":"1161810404","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":427,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374256201,"gmtCreate":1619450497703,"gmtModify":1634273347140,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","listText":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","text":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/374256201","repostId":"2130364766","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2130364766","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619318325,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2130364766?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-25 10:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What to Expect From Tesla's Q1 Earnings Report On Monday<blockquote>特斯拉周一发布的第一季度收益报告有何期待</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2130364766","media":"Benzinga","summary":"EV giant Tesla, Inc.  is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For:  Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins:  The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe458ac1cf82668bd4bf27fbaa6506e5\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>EV giant <b>Tesla, Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: TSLA) is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车巨头<b>特斯拉公司。</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA）定于周一收盘后发布第一季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p><b>Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For: </b> Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.</p><p><blockquote><b>第一季度值得关注的关键指标：</b>特斯拉预计2021年第一季度非GAAP每股收益(EPS)为79美分，较去年同期的23美分大幅上升。</blockquote></p><p>The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.</p><p><blockquote>该季度的普遍收入预测为102.9亿美元，同比增长72%。</blockquote></p><p>In the fourth quarter, Tesla had earned 80 cents per share on a non-GAAP basis on revenues of $10.74 billion.</p><p><blockquote>第四季度，特斯拉按非公认会计准则计算每股收益80美分，营收为107.4亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla revealed in early April it delivered a record 184,800 vehicles in the first quarter, comprising 182,780 Model 3/Y vehicles and 2,020 Model S/X vehicles. This represents a 109% year-over-year increase and 2.2% sequential growth. Quarterly production was at 180,338.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉4月初透露，第一季度交付了创纪录的184,800辆汽车，其中包括182,780辆Model 3/Y汽车和2,020辆Model S/X汽车。这意味着同比增长109%，环比增长2.2%。季度产量为180,338辆。</blockquote></p><p><b>Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins: </b> The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4.3% of its revenues in the fourth quarter of 2020. Zero-emission vehicle regulations adopted by several states allow EV manufacturers to&nbsp;earn regulatory credits, which can be monetized by selling to legacy automakers, who are not able to achieve the minimum target set for the proportion of green energy vehicles sold.</p><p><blockquote><b>关注监管信贷、汽车利润率：</b>重点可能是监管信贷，该信贷占其2020年第四季度收入的4.3%。多个州采用的零排放汽车法规允许电动汽车制造商获得监管积分，这些积分可以通过向无法实现绿色能源汽车销售比例最低目标的传统汽车制造商销售来货币化。</blockquote></p><p>Automotive gross margin slipped to 24.1% in the fourth quarter of 2020 from 27.7% in the previous quarter. It's likely the company could see a further moderation in margins, as production of the higher priced Model S/X vehicles was stalled in the quarter to allow for model refreshes.</p><p><blockquote>汽车毛利率从上一季度的27.7%下滑至2020年第四季度的24.1%。由于价格较高的Model S/X车辆的生产在本季度暂停以进行车型更新，该公司的利润率可能会进一步放缓。</blockquote></p><p><b>View more earnings on TSLA</b></p><p><blockquote><b>查看特斯拉的更多收益</b></blockquote></p><p>With competitive pressure intensifying, Tesla could aggressively slash vehicles prices in order to achieve volume production targets, long-time Tesla bear Gordon Johnson said in a note previewing the quarterly results.</p><p><blockquote>长期看空特斯拉的Gordon Johnson在一份预览季度业绩的报告中表示，随着竞争压力的加剧，特斯拉可能会大幅削减汽车价格，以实现量产目标。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla investors may also be keen to find out more about the company's Bitcoin investment strategy and its decision to allow the use of Bitcoin for vehicle purchases.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉投资者可能还热衷于了解更多有关该公司比特币投资战略及其允许使用比特币购买车辆的决定。</blockquote></p><p><b>Forward Outlook:</b> Tesla is well positioned to capitalize on the opportunity presented by the exponential growth that is anticipated for green energy vehicles.<b> </b>Its&nbsp;Giga Shanghai factory is now churning out both Model S and Model Y vehicles, and more capacity is expected to come on line with the opening of factories in Berlin and Texas.</p><p><blockquote><b>前瞻：</b>特斯拉处于有利地位，可以利用绿色能源汽车预期的指数增长所带来的机遇。<b></b>其上海超级工厂目前正在生产Model S和Model Y汽车，随着柏林和德克萨斯州工厂的开业，预计产能将增加。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla's CFO Zach Kirkhorn said on the earnings call that the company is shooting for a 50% compounded annual growth rate in volume sales&nbsp;and expects to materially exceed the target in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉首席财务官扎克·柯克霍恩(Zach Kirkhorn)在财报看涨期权上表示，该公司的目标是销量复合年增长率达到50%，预计2021年将大幅超过目标。</blockquote></p><p><b>Stock Take: </b> Tesla's shares, which were flying high until early February, joined the tech sell-off that ensued. From a split-adjusted high of $900.40 on Jan. 25, the stock fell to $539.49 on March 5, a peak-to-trough decline of 40%.</p><p><blockquote><b>盘点：</b>特斯拉的股价在二月初之前一直在飙升，随后加入了科技股的抛售。该股从1月25日拆分调整后的高点900.40美元跌至3月5日的539.49美元，峰谷跌幅为40%。</blockquote></p><p>Although the stock has made good some of the losses since then, it is yet to break above $800 level.</p><p><blockquote>尽管该股此后已经弥补了部分损失，但尚未突破800美元水平。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla holds a several-year lead and is now expanding aggressively into storage, and therefore a premium valuation for its shares is justified, CANACCORD Genuity analyst Jed Dorsheimer said in a recent note. The firm has a $1,071 price target for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>CANACCORD Genuity分析师杰德·多斯海默(Jed Dorsheimer)在最近的一份报告中表示，特斯拉保持了数年的领先地位，目前正在积极向存储领域扩张，因此其股票的溢价估值是合理的。该公司对该股的目标价为1,071美元。</blockquote></p><p>Friday, Tesla's shares ended 1.35% higher at $729.40.</p><p><blockquote>周五，特斯拉股价收盘上涨1.35%，至729.40美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What to Expect From Tesla's Q1 Earnings Report On Monday<blockquote>特斯拉周一发布的第一季度收益报告有何期待</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat to Expect From Tesla's Q1 Earnings Report On Monday<blockquote>特斯拉周一发布的第一季度收益报告有何期待</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-25 10:38</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe458ac1cf82668bd4bf27fbaa6506e5\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>EV giant <b>Tesla, Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: TSLA) is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车巨头<b>特斯拉公司。</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA）定于周一收盘后发布第一季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p><b>Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For: </b> Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.</p><p><blockquote><b>第一季度值得关注的关键指标：</b>特斯拉预计2021年第一季度非GAAP每股收益(EPS)为79美分，较去年同期的23美分大幅上升。</blockquote></p><p>The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.</p><p><blockquote>该季度的普遍收入预测为102.9亿美元，同比增长72%。</blockquote></p><p>In the fourth quarter, Tesla had earned 80 cents per share on a non-GAAP basis on revenues of $10.74 billion.</p><p><blockquote>第四季度，特斯拉按非公认会计准则计算每股收益80美分，营收为107.4亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla revealed in early April it delivered a record 184,800 vehicles in the first quarter, comprising 182,780 Model 3/Y vehicles and 2,020 Model S/X vehicles. This represents a 109% year-over-year increase and 2.2% sequential growth. Quarterly production was at 180,338.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉4月初透露，第一季度交付了创纪录的184,800辆汽车，其中包括182,780辆Model 3/Y汽车和2,020辆Model S/X汽车。这意味着同比增长109%，环比增长2.2%。季度产量为180,338辆。</blockquote></p><p><b>Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins: </b> The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4.3% of its revenues in the fourth quarter of 2020. Zero-emission vehicle regulations adopted by several states allow EV manufacturers to&nbsp;earn regulatory credits, which can be monetized by selling to legacy automakers, who are not able to achieve the minimum target set for the proportion of green energy vehicles sold.</p><p><blockquote><b>关注监管信贷、汽车利润率：</b>重点可能是监管信贷，该信贷占其2020年第四季度收入的4.3%。多个州采用的零排放汽车法规允许电动汽车制造商获得监管积分，这些积分可以通过向无法实现绿色能源汽车销售比例最低目标的传统汽车制造商销售来货币化。</blockquote></p><p>Automotive gross margin slipped to 24.1% in the fourth quarter of 2020 from 27.7% in the previous quarter. It's likely the company could see a further moderation in margins, as production of the higher priced Model S/X vehicles was stalled in the quarter to allow for model refreshes.</p><p><blockquote>汽车毛利率从上一季度的27.7%下滑至2020年第四季度的24.1%。由于价格较高的Model S/X车辆的生产在本季度暂停以进行车型更新，该公司的利润率可能会进一步放缓。</blockquote></p><p><b>View more earnings on TSLA</b></p><p><blockquote><b>查看特斯拉的更多收益</b></blockquote></p><p>With competitive pressure intensifying, Tesla could aggressively slash vehicles prices in order to achieve volume production targets, long-time Tesla bear Gordon Johnson said in a note previewing the quarterly results.</p><p><blockquote>长期看空特斯拉的Gordon Johnson在一份预览季度业绩的报告中表示，随着竞争压力的加剧，特斯拉可能会大幅削减汽车价格，以实现量产目标。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla investors may also be keen to find out more about the company's Bitcoin investment strategy and its decision to allow the use of Bitcoin for vehicle purchases.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉投资者可能还热衷于了解更多有关该公司比特币投资战略及其允许使用比特币购买车辆的决定。</blockquote></p><p><b>Forward Outlook:</b> Tesla is well positioned to capitalize on the opportunity presented by the exponential growth that is anticipated for green energy vehicles.<b> </b>Its&nbsp;Giga Shanghai factory is now churning out both Model S and Model Y vehicles, and more capacity is expected to come on line with the opening of factories in Berlin and Texas.</p><p><blockquote><b>前瞻：</b>特斯拉处于有利地位，可以利用绿色能源汽车预期的指数增长所带来的机遇。<b></b>其上海超级工厂目前正在生产Model S和Model Y汽车，随着柏林和德克萨斯州工厂的开业，预计产能将增加。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla's CFO Zach Kirkhorn said on the earnings call that the company is shooting for a 50% compounded annual growth rate in volume sales&nbsp;and expects to materially exceed the target in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉首席财务官扎克·柯克霍恩(Zach Kirkhorn)在财报看涨期权上表示，该公司的目标是销量复合年增长率达到50%，预计2021年将大幅超过目标。</blockquote></p><p><b>Stock Take: </b> Tesla's shares, which were flying high until early February, joined the tech sell-off that ensued. From a split-adjusted high of $900.40 on Jan. 25, the stock fell to $539.49 on March 5, a peak-to-trough decline of 40%.</p><p><blockquote><b>盘点：</b>特斯拉的股价在二月初之前一直在飙升，随后加入了科技股的抛售。该股从1月25日拆分调整后的高点900.40美元跌至3月5日的539.49美元，峰谷跌幅为40%。</blockquote></p><p>Although the stock has made good some of the losses since then, it is yet to break above $800 level.</p><p><blockquote>尽管该股此后已经弥补了部分损失，但尚未突破800美元水平。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla holds a several-year lead and is now expanding aggressively into storage, and therefore a premium valuation for its shares is justified, CANACCORD Genuity analyst Jed Dorsheimer said in a recent note. The firm has a $1,071 price target for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>CANACCORD Genuity分析师杰德·多斯海默(Jed Dorsheimer)在最近的一份报告中表示，特斯拉保持了数年的领先地位，目前正在积极向存储领域扩张，因此其股票的溢价估值是合理的。该公司对该股的目标价为1,071美元。</blockquote></p><p>Friday, Tesla's shares ended 1.35% higher at $729.40.</p><p><blockquote>周五，特斯拉股价收盘上涨1.35%，至729.40美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2130364766","content_text":"EV giant Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For:  Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.In the fourth quarter, Tesla had earned 80 cents per share on a non-GAAP basis on revenues of $10.74 billion.Tesla revealed in early April it delivered a record 184,800 vehicles in the first quarter, comprising 182,780 Model 3/Y vehicles and 2,020 Model S/X vehicles. This represents a 109% year-over-year increase and 2.2% sequential growth. Quarterly production was at 180,338.Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins:  The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4.3% of its revenues in the fourth quarter of 2020. Zero-emission vehicle regulations adopted by several states allow EV manufacturers to earn regulatory credits, which can be monetized by selling to legacy automakers, who are not able to achieve the minimum target set for the proportion of green energy vehicles sold.Automotive gross margin slipped to 24.1% in the fourth quarter of 2020 from 27.7% in the previous quarter. It's likely the company could see a further moderation in margins, as production of the higher priced Model S/X vehicles was stalled in the quarter to allow for model refreshes.View more earnings on TSLAWith competitive pressure intensifying, Tesla could aggressively slash vehicles prices in order to achieve volume production targets, long-time Tesla bear Gordon Johnson said in a note previewing the quarterly results.Tesla investors may also be keen to find out more about the company's Bitcoin investment strategy and its decision to allow the use of Bitcoin for vehicle purchases.Forward Outlook: Tesla is well positioned to capitalize on the opportunity presented by the exponential growth that is anticipated for green energy vehicles. Its Giga Shanghai factory is now churning out both Model S and Model Y vehicles, and more capacity is expected to come on line with the opening of factories in Berlin and Texas.Tesla's CFO Zach Kirkhorn said on the earnings call that the company is shooting for a 50% compounded annual growth rate in volume sales and expects to materially exceed the target in 2021.Stock Take:  Tesla's shares, which were flying high until early February, joined the tech sell-off that ensued. From a split-adjusted high of $900.40 on Jan. 25, the stock fell to $539.49 on March 5, a peak-to-trough decline of 40%.Although the stock has made good some of the losses since then, it is yet to break above $800 level.Tesla holds a several-year lead and is now expanding aggressively into storage, and therefore a premium valuation for its shares is justified, CANACCORD Genuity analyst Jed Dorsheimer said in a recent note. The firm has a $1,071 price target for the stock.Friday, Tesla's shares ended 1.35% higher at $729.40.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376892382,"gmtCreate":1619101460146,"gmtModify":1634288547092,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","listText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","text":"Ohhh good explanation","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/376892382","repostId":"1172040780","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172040780","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619096972,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172040780?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-22 21:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound<blockquote>3只处于重要支撑位并可能反弹的电动汽车股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172040780","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. ,Tesla,Inc. , and Nikola Corporation  are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay h","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车企业<b>蔚来</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：蔚来），<b>特斯拉</b>,<b>公司。</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA），以及<b>尼古拉公司</b>（纳斯达克：NKLA）均接近支撑位。这意味着他们很有可能反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p><p><blockquote>支撑是聚集在同一价格水平的买家的集中。在支撑位，对股票的需求大于供应。卖家可以出售他们需要的所有东西，而不用担心压低价格。</blockquote></p><p> Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p><p><blockquote>下降趋势在达到支撑位时结束。</blockquote></p><p> Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p><p><blockquote>有时，股票在跌至支撑位后会反弹。当一些市场参与者决定支付更高的价格时，就会发生这种情况。这些投资者认为，创造支撑的大买家最终会推高股价。他们想抢在他们前面。</blockquote></p><p> Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来在35美元附近持有支撑。3月上中旬也达到了这一水平。两次都出现了小幅反弹，而且这种情况可能会再次发生。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在700美元附近持有支撑。700美元有支撑位，因为这是一个阻力位，阻力位可以变成支撑位。</blockquote></p><p> This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p><p><blockquote>发生这种情况是因为许多以700美元出售股票的投资者认为，当股票随后走高时，他们犯了一个错误。其中许多投资者决定回购股票，但只有在能够以与出售时相同的价格购买股票的情况下，他们才会这样做。</blockquote></p><p> As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p><p><blockquote>因此，买入订单被置于阻力位，这将创造支撑位。如果有足够多的买单，该水平将变成支撑位。这里就是这样。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p><p><blockquote>尼古拉的股价又回到了原点。</blockquote></p><p> Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p><p><blockquote>去年4月，它们的交易价格约为10美元，6月飙升至90美元以上。此后，该股呈走低趋势，交易价格再次为10美元。</blockquote></p><p> There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p><p><blockquote>10美元有支撑，因为投资者喜欢以偶数下单。在大幅下跌之后，股价有可能出现某种类型的反弹。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound<blockquote>3只处于重要支撑位并可能反弹的电动汽车股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound<blockquote>3只处于重要支撑位并可能反弹的电动汽车股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-22 21:09</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车企业<b>蔚来</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：蔚来），<b>特斯拉</b>,<b>公司。</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA），以及<b>尼古拉公司</b>（纳斯达克：NKLA）均接近支撑位。这意味着他们很有可能反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p><p><blockquote>支撑是聚集在同一价格水平的买家的集中。在支撑位，对股票的需求大于供应。卖家可以出售他们需要的所有东西，而不用担心压低价格。</blockquote></p><p> Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p><p><blockquote>下降趋势在达到支撑位时结束。</blockquote></p><p> Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p><p><blockquote>有时，股票在跌至支撑位后会反弹。当一些市场参与者决定支付更高的价格时，就会发生这种情况。这些投资者认为，创造支撑的大买家最终会推高股价。他们想抢在他们前面。</blockquote></p><p> Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来在35美元附近持有支撑。3月上中旬也达到了这一水平。两次都出现了小幅反弹，而且这种情况可能会再次发生。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在700美元附近持有支撑。700美元有支撑位，因为这是一个阻力位，阻力位可以变成支撑位。</blockquote></p><p> This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p><p><blockquote>发生这种情况是因为许多以700美元出售股票的投资者认为，当股票随后走高时，他们犯了一个错误。其中许多投资者决定回购股票，但只有在能够以与出售时相同的价格购买股票的情况下，他们才会这样做。</blockquote></p><p> As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p><p><blockquote>因此，买入订单被置于阻力位，这将创造支撑位。如果有足够多的买单，该水平将变成支撑位。这里就是这样。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p><p><blockquote>尼古拉的股价又回到了原点。</blockquote></p><p> Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p><p><blockquote>去年4月，它们的交易价格约为10美元，6月飙升至90美元以上。此后，该股呈走低趋势，交易价格再次为10美元。</blockquote></p><p> There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p><p><blockquote>10美元有支撑，因为投资者喜欢以偶数下单。在大幅下跌之后，股价有可能出现某种类型的反弹。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172040780","content_text":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. (NYSE:NIO),Tesla,Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA), and Nikola Corporation (NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.\nSupport is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.\nDowntrends end when they reach support levels.\nSometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.\nNio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.\n\nTesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.\nThis happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.\nAs a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.\n\nShares of Nikola have come full circle.\nLast April, they were trading around $10 and soared to more than $90 in June. Since then, the stock has trended lower and is trading at $10 once again.\nThere’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance shares stage some type of rebound.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"NKLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":846,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":378383719,"gmtCreate":1619001087431,"gmtModify":1634289317410,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","listText":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","text":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/378383719","repostId":"1131238315","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131238315","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1618992068,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1131238315?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-21 16:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading<blockquote>Netflix股价在盘前交易中暴跌超过8%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131238315","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Netflix Inc said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth","content":"<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix公司表示，疫情期间电视节目和电影制作放缓损害了第一季度的用户增长，导致这家全球最大流媒体服务公司的股价在周三盘前交易中下跌8%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a93bcc114bbf3391d2ddf1fcbecc2b9\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Roughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>1月至3月，约有398万人注册了Netflix，低于Refinitiv调查的分析师625万人的平均预测。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix估计第二季度仅会新增100万流媒体客户。分析师此前预计接近480万。</blockquote></p><p> Shares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).</p><p><blockquote>Netflix股价在盘后交易中下跌11%，至489.28美元，公司市值蒸发250亿美元。过去12个月，其股价上涨了27%，而以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数(.IXIC)则上涨了63%。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"</p><p><blockquote>Netflix表示，它认为本季度竞争不会发生重大变化，也不会影响其新注册人数，“因为我们所有地区都出现了超额预测”。</blockquote></p><p> The company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.</p><p><blockquote>该公司预计，随着新一季的《你》、《金钱大劫案》、《巫师》和动作片《红色通缉令》等影片的上映，今年下半年会员增长将加速。</blockquote></p><p> A year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.</p><p><blockquote>一年前，由于疫情迫使世界各地的人们呆在家里，Netflix增加了创纪录的1580万客户。该公司周二表示，疫情阻碍了新节目的拍摄。</blockquote></p><p> \"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在致股东的季度信中表示：“这些动态也导致2021年上半年内容数量减少，因此，我们认为会员增长将放缓。”</blockquote></p><p> Analysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.</p><p><blockquote>分析师预计，随着COVID-19疫苗接种的普及以及更多的人走出家门，人们花在客厅的时间将会减少。</blockquote></p><p> Rival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.</p><p><blockquote>竞争对手的媒体公司已经宣布流媒体是他们的优先事项，并花费数十亿美元与Netflix竞争。华特迪士尼公司(DIS.N)Disney+3月份订阅用户突破1亿。截至3月底，Netflix的流媒体客户总数为2.076亿。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.</p><p><blockquote>根据Kantar Media的数据，本季度Netflix在美国新用户中的份额从去年同期的16.2%降至8.5%。</blockquote></p><p> During the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.</p><p><blockquote>本季度，当职场喜剧《办公室》转移到康卡斯特公司(CMCSA.O)流媒体服务Peacock时，Netflix失去了最受欢迎的作品之一。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix本季度还提高了英国、德国、阿根廷和日本的月费。</blockquote></p><p> New customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.</p><p><blockquote>欧洲新增客户180万，亚洲新增客户136万，拉丁美洲新增客户36万。</blockquote></p><p> \"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.</p><p><blockquote>eMarketer分析师埃里克·哈格斯特罗姆(Eric Haggstrom)表示：“出乎意料的是国际市场放缓的力度，国际市场的竞争明显减弱。”</blockquote></p><p> Excluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.</p><p><blockquote>不计项目，该公司第一季度每股收益3.75美元，超出分析师预期的每股2.97美元。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.</p><p><blockquote>本季度收入从57.7亿美元增至71.6亿美元，略高于预期的71.3亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Net income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>净利润从去年同期的7.09亿美元（即每股1.57美元）增至17.1亿美元（即每股3.75美元）。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading<blockquote>Netflix股价在盘前交易中暴跌超过8%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading<blockquote>Netflix股价在盘前交易中暴跌超过8%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-21 16:01</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix公司表示，疫情期间电视节目和电影制作放缓损害了第一季度的用户增长，导致这家全球最大流媒体服务公司的股价在周三盘前交易中下跌8%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a93bcc114bbf3391d2ddf1fcbecc2b9\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Roughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>1月至3月，约有398万人注册了Netflix，低于Refinitiv调查的分析师625万人的平均预测。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix估计第二季度仅会新增100万流媒体客户。分析师此前预计接近480万。</blockquote></p><p> Shares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).</p><p><blockquote>Netflix股价在盘后交易中下跌11%，至489.28美元，公司市值蒸发250亿美元。过去12个月，其股价上涨了27%，而以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数(.IXIC)则上涨了63%。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"</p><p><blockquote>Netflix表示，它认为本季度竞争不会发生重大变化，也不会影响其新注册人数，“因为我们所有地区都出现了超额预测”。</blockquote></p><p> The company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.</p><p><blockquote>该公司预计，随着新一季的《你》、《金钱大劫案》、《巫师》和动作片《红色通缉令》等影片的上映，今年下半年会员增长将加速。</blockquote></p><p> A year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.</p><p><blockquote>一年前，由于疫情迫使世界各地的人们呆在家里，Netflix增加了创纪录的1580万客户。该公司周二表示，疫情阻碍了新节目的拍摄。</blockquote></p><p> \"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在致股东的季度信中表示：“这些动态也导致2021年上半年内容数量减少，因此，我们认为会员增长将放缓。”</blockquote></p><p> Analysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.</p><p><blockquote>分析师预计，随着COVID-19疫苗接种的普及以及更多的人走出家门，人们花在客厅的时间将会减少。</blockquote></p><p> Rival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.</p><p><blockquote>竞争对手的媒体公司已经宣布流媒体是他们的优先事项，并花费数十亿美元与Netflix竞争。华特迪士尼公司(DIS.N)Disney+3月份订阅用户突破1亿。截至3月底，Netflix的流媒体客户总数为2.076亿。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.</p><p><blockquote>根据Kantar Media的数据，本季度Netflix在美国新用户中的份额从去年同期的16.2%降至8.5%。</blockquote></p><p> During the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.</p><p><blockquote>本季度，当职场喜剧《办公室》转移到康卡斯特公司(CMCSA.O)流媒体服务Peacock时，Netflix失去了最受欢迎的作品之一。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix本季度还提高了英国、德国、阿根廷和日本的月费。</blockquote></p><p> New customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.</p><p><blockquote>欧洲新增客户180万，亚洲新增客户136万，拉丁美洲新增客户36万。</blockquote></p><p> \"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.</p><p><blockquote>eMarketer分析师埃里克·哈格斯特罗姆(Eric Haggstrom)表示：“出乎意料的是国际市场放缓的力度，国际市场的竞争明显减弱。”</blockquote></p><p> Excluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.</p><p><blockquote>不计项目，该公司第一季度每股收益3.75美元，超出分析师预期的每股2.97美元。</blockquote></p><p> Revenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.</p><p><blockquote>本季度收入从57.7亿美元增至71.6亿美元，略高于预期的71.3亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Net income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>净利润从去年同期的7.09亿美元（即每股1.57美元）增至17.1亿美元（即每股3.75美元）。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131238315","content_text":"Netflix Inc said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday premarket trading.\n\nRoughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.\nNetflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.\nShares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).\nNetflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"\nThe company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.\nA year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.\n\"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.\nAnalysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.\nRival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.\nNetflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.\nDuring the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.\nNetflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.\nNew customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.\n\"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.\nExcluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.\nRevenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.\nNet income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":463,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":344162439,"gmtCreate":1618388733521,"gmtModify":1634293300109,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Slightly confusing how this works!","listText":"Slightly confusing how this works!","text":"Slightly confusing how this works!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/344162439","repostId":"2127461210","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":347,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":348155095,"gmtCreate":1617896179017,"gmtModify":1631888290542,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$</a>went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$</a>went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","text":"$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/348155095","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":541,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":341899511,"gmtCreate":1617800439733,"gmtModify":1634296447557,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yay!","listText":"Yay!","text":"Yay!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/341899511","repostId":"1199135554","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":634,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":343277534,"gmtCreate":1617721592328,"gmtModify":1634296898189,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/343277534","repostId":"2125902177","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":376892382,"gmtCreate":1619101460146,"gmtModify":1634288547092,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","listText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","text":"Ohhh good explanation","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/376892382","repostId":"1172040780","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172040780","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619096972,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172040780?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-22 21:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound<blockquote>3只处于重要支撑位并可能反弹的电动汽车股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172040780","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. ,Tesla,Inc. , and Nikola Corporation  are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay h","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车企业<b>蔚来</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：蔚来），<b>特斯拉</b>,<b>公司。</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA），以及<b>尼古拉公司</b>（纳斯达克：NKLA）均接近支撑位。这意味着他们很有可能反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p><p><blockquote>支撑是聚集在同一价格水平的买家的集中。在支撑位，对股票的需求大于供应。卖家可以出售他们需要的所有东西，而不用担心压低价格。</blockquote></p><p> Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p><p><blockquote>下降趋势在达到支撑位时结束。</blockquote></p><p> Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p><p><blockquote>有时，股票在跌至支撑位后会反弹。当一些市场参与者决定支付更高的价格时，就会发生这种情况。这些投资者认为，创造支撑的大买家最终会推高股价。他们想抢在他们前面。</blockquote></p><p> Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来在35美元附近持有支撑。3月上中旬也达到了这一水平。两次都出现了小幅反弹，而且这种情况可能会再次发生。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在700美元附近持有支撑。700美元有支撑位，因为这是一个阻力位，阻力位可以变成支撑位。</blockquote></p><p> This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p><p><blockquote>发生这种情况是因为许多以700美元出售股票的投资者认为，当股票随后走高时，他们犯了一个错误。其中许多投资者决定回购股票，但只有在能够以与出售时相同的价格购买股票的情况下，他们才会这样做。</blockquote></p><p> As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p><p><blockquote>因此，买入订单被置于阻力位，这将创造支撑位。如果有足够多的买单，该水平将变成支撑位。这里就是这样。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p><p><blockquote>尼古拉的股价又回到了原点。</blockquote></p><p> Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p><p><blockquote>去年4月，它们的交易价格约为10美元，6月飙升至90美元以上。此后，该股呈走低趋势，交易价格再次为10美元。</blockquote></p><p> There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p><p><blockquote>10美元有支撑，因为投资者喜欢以偶数下单。在大幅下跌之后，股价有可能出现某种类型的反弹。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound<blockquote>3只处于重要支撑位并可能反弹的电动汽车股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound<blockquote>3只处于重要支撑位并可能反弹的电动汽车股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-22 21:09</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车企业<b>蔚来</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：蔚来），<b>特斯拉</b>,<b>公司。</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA），以及<b>尼古拉公司</b>（纳斯达克：NKLA）均接近支撑位。这意味着他们很有可能反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p><p><blockquote>支撑是聚集在同一价格水平的买家的集中。在支撑位，对股票的需求大于供应。卖家可以出售他们需要的所有东西，而不用担心压低价格。</blockquote></p><p> Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p><p><blockquote>下降趋势在达到支撑位时结束。</blockquote></p><p> Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p><p><blockquote>有时，股票在跌至支撑位后会反弹。当一些市场参与者决定支付更高的价格时，就会发生这种情况。这些投资者认为，创造支撑的大买家最终会推高股价。他们想抢在他们前面。</blockquote></p><p> Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来在35美元附近持有支撑。3月上中旬也达到了这一水平。两次都出现了小幅反弹，而且这种情况可能会再次发生。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在700美元附近持有支撑。700美元有支撑位，因为这是一个阻力位，阻力位可以变成支撑位。</blockquote></p><p> This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p><p><blockquote>发生这种情况是因为许多以700美元出售股票的投资者认为，当股票随后走高时，他们犯了一个错误。其中许多投资者决定回购股票，但只有在能够以与出售时相同的价格购买股票的情况下，他们才会这样做。</blockquote></p><p> As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p><p><blockquote>因此，买入订单被置于阻力位，这将创造支撑位。如果有足够多的买单，该水平将变成支撑位。这里就是这样。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p><p><blockquote>尼古拉的股价又回到了原点。</blockquote></p><p> Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p><p><blockquote>去年4月，它们的交易价格约为10美元，6月飙升至90美元以上。此后，该股呈走低趋势，交易价格再次为10美元。</blockquote></p><p> There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p><p><blockquote>10美元有支撑，因为投资者喜欢以偶数下单。在大幅下跌之后，股价有可能出现某种类型的反弹。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172040780","content_text":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. (NYSE:NIO),Tesla,Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA), and Nikola Corporation (NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.\nSupport is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.\nDowntrends end when they reach support levels.\nSometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.\nNio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.\n\nTesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.\nThis happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.\nAs a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.\n\nShares of Nikola have come full circle.\nLast April, they were trading around $10 and soared to more than $90 in June. Since then, the stock has trended lower and is trading at $10 once again.\nThere’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance shares stage some type of rebound.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"NKLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":846,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":341899511,"gmtCreate":1617800439733,"gmtModify":1634296447557,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yay!","listText":"Yay!","text":"Yay!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/341899511","repostId":"1199135554","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":634,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":100673831,"gmtCreate":1619613528223,"gmtModify":1634211348655,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","listText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","text":"Hmmm food for thought","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/100673831","repostId":"1138128459","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138128459","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619608043,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138128459?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-28 19:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street<blockquote>华尔街称5只超受欢迎的成长型股票，上涨空间为28%至56%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138128459","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on M","content":"<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-based<b>S&amp;P 500</b>has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.</p><p><blockquote>13个月来，华尔街几乎势不可挡。自2020年3月23日触及熊市底部以来，宽基<b>标普500</b>在过去的这个周末，股价飙升了87%。这轻松超过了熊市底部的平均反弹反弹，并让基准指数的历史平均年回报率烟消云散。</blockquote></p><p> Yet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.</p><p><blockquote>然而，即使在这些崇高的水平上，华尔街的专业人士也看到了价值。根据华尔街分析师一致的一年价格目标，五只最受欢迎的成长型股票的隐含上涨空间从28%的低点到高达56%不等。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d19c9dd5972bb303415e3fb9e20fb2d4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify: Implied upside of 31%</p><p><blockquote>Shopify：隐含上涨31%</blockquote></p><p> First up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,<b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.</p><p><blockquote>首先是我最喜欢的软件即服务（SaaS）股票，<b>Shopify</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SHOP）。尽管在过去3.5年里上涨了1,000%以上，华尔街认为该公司的股票明年还有31%的上涨空间，达到每股1,434美元。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify为（主要）小型企业提供基于云的电子商务解决方案的运营模式目前再好不过了。尽管Shopify最初与几乎所有其他零售型公司一样受到了疫情的打击，但随着企业改变方向并转向线上，Shopify的电子商务平台很快就会成为合乎逻辑的受益者。结果是2020年其平台交易的商品总值(GMV)增长了96%，达到1196亿美元。过去六年，GMV以77.7%的年复合增长率增长。</blockquote></p><p> What's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes of<b>Walmart</b>&nbsp;and<b>Pinterest</b>to streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify的成功之处在于新商家对该平台的发现以及与主要零售商达成有价值交易的能力。去年使用该平台的消费者数量增长了约52%，达到4.57亿。与此同时，它与<b>沃尔玛</b>和<b>Pinterest</b>简化他们在线销售平台的各个方面。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify从根本上来说并不便宜。但如果它的GMV能够继续以如此疯狂的水平增长，投资者将很乐意支付高额溢价来持有Shopify股票。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df219df7b01fbc2aa008c455f28b99e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Teladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%</p><p><blockquote>Teladoc Health：隐含上涨40%</blockquote></p><p> Telemedicine giant<b>Teladoc Health</b>(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.</p><p><blockquote>远程医疗巨头<b>Teladoc健康</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TDOC）在过去的一年里非常受欢迎，原因显而易见，我稍后会谈到。据华尔街报道，Teladoc的股价在未来12个月内可能会升至250美元以上，隐含上涨空间为40%。</blockquote></p><p> As you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.</p><p><blockquote>可以想象，去年，如果可能的话，医生希望让高危人群和潜在感染患者远离办公室和医院。这导致Teladoc在2020年处理了近1060万次虚拟访问，高于上一年的约410万次。</blockquote></p><p> But understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.</p><p><blockquote>但是要明白，远程医疗是一种改变游戏规则的医疗保健模式，而不仅仅是因为疫情而成为一年的奇迹。这对患者来说要方便得多，允许医生更密切地关注高危患者，而且通常比健康保险公司喜欢的办公室就诊收费更低。这些优势正是Teladoc销售额在2013年至2019年间年均增长74%的原因。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.</p><p><blockquote>此外，可以说，Teladoc还有一个新玩具：它在11月初收购了领先的应用健康信号公司Livongo Health。Livongo依靠人工智能向慢性病患者发送提示和提示。这些轻推帮助患者改变行为，从而过上更健康的生活。Livongo的加入使Teladoc成为名副其实的理所当然的购买对象。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e47e6b6eced3a10e200ffd777619a0c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake: Implied upside of 28%</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake：隐含上涨28%</blockquote></p><p> Another high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing company<b>Snowflake</b>(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街专业人士认为，另一只上涨空间巨大的高增长股票是云数据仓库公司<b>雪花</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SNOW）。在最近回落至历史低点后，分析师预计Snowflake在未来12个月内将上涨28%，达到每股近301美元。</blockquote></p><p> As I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.</p><p><blockquote>正如我在Shopify中提到的，我们正在见证企业在线和云的大力推动，这对大多数云基础设施公司来说都是一个福音。尽管经历了几十年来最严重的经济衰退，Snowflake在2021财年的产品收入仍增长了120%，达到5.538亿美元。尽管目前损失了很多钱，但随着公司的成熟，Snowflake提供的服务应该会产生丰厚的利润。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Arguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.</p><p><blockquote>可以说，Snowflake最有趣的事情是其可持续的竞争优势。例如，它提供了一种现收现付模式，避免了SaaS股票经常觊觎的订阅。通过允许客户根据他们的存储需求和使用的雪花计算点数付费，它提供了一种高度透明且经济高效的运营模式。</blockquote></p><p> Even better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.</p><p><blockquote>更好的是，它的平台位于最流行的云基础设施解决方案之上，这使得信息共享无缝，无论存储提供商是谁。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake的高估值需要填补一些非常大的空缺，但华尔街相信该公司能够做到这一点。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbafad9e87b7b7dacfefe92d4741b655\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Datadog: Implied upside of 35%</p><p><blockquote>Datadog：隐含上涨35%</blockquote></p><p> Have I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions provider<b>Datadog</b>(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.</p><p><blockquote>我有没有提到华尔街对SaaS股票情有独钟？除了Shopify和Snowflake之外，分析师认为应用监控解决方案提供商<b>Datadog</b>（纳斯达克：DDOG）明年可能飙升至每股121美元。这意味着其股价有高达35%的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> Keeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.</p><p><blockquote>与主题保持一致，Datadog希望从大流行后企业彻底转变战略中受益。随着员工远程工作，企业掌握关键指标、监督关键应用程序并充分了解客户的行为变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。Datadog基于云的解决方案为其客户完成了所有这些工作。</blockquote></p><p> What's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.</p><p><blockquote>Datadog最令人印象深刻的是该公司吸引更大客户的能力。虽然年经常性收入(ARR)至少为100,000美元的客户增加46%是不错的，但令人惊叹的数字是ARR至少为100万美元的客户数量增加了94%。这是该公司2020年销售额猛增66%至6.035亿美元的一个重要原因。</blockquote></p><p> Similar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.</p><p><blockquote>与Snowflake类似，Datadog凭借其高昂的市销率需要证明很多东西。然而，如果它的销售额能够继续以每年30%以上的速度增长，那么华尔街的价格目标就没有理由达不到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99b3853458b2424e2901821012f5502f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Coinbase: Implied upside of 56%</p><p><blockquote>Coinbase：隐含上涨56%</blockquote></p><p> Finally, recent initial public offering<b>Coinbase</b>(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>最后，近期首次公开发行<b>Coinbase</b>（纳斯达克：COIN）在这五家快速增长的公司中提供了最高的上涨空间。尽管上周末只列出了四个目标价，但每股600美元的崇高目标将共识扭曲至每股456美元。这表明Coinbase在未来12个月内可能会上涨56%。</blockquote></p><p> There's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies like<b>Bitcoin</b>and&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!</p><p><blockquote>毫无疑问，Coinbase受益于围绕加密货币的兴奋，例如<b>比特币</b>和<b>以太币</b>.随着今年两者都反弹至新高，Coinbase第一季度营收为18亿美元。在某些情况下，这比过去24个月的收入总和还要多！</blockquote></p><p> However, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与这里列出的其他受欢迎的公司不同，Coinbase的优势充其量看起来很脆弱。它面临着竞争加密货币经纪公司降低其费用的风险，随着时间的推移，这可能会大幅降低其营业利润率和增长率。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria&nbsp;rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.</p><p><blockquote>此外，它的商业模式看起来是建立在兴奋而不是创新之上的。由于其大部分收入来自比特币和以太币交易，当这些关键资产的价格停止上涨时会发生什么令人担忧。在比特币市值损失80%的两年内，Coinbase的收入几乎减半。</blockquote></p><p> In sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.</p><p><blockquote>总而言之，华尔街可能看好Coinbase，但这个傻瓜却不看好。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street<blockquote>华尔街称5只超受欢迎的成长型股票，上涨空间为28%至56%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street<blockquote>华尔街称5只超受欢迎的成长型股票，上涨空间为28%至56%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-28 19:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-based<b>S&amp;P 500</b>has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.</p><p><blockquote>13个月来，华尔街几乎势不可挡。自2020年3月23日触及熊市底部以来，宽基<b>标普500</b>在过去的这个周末，股价飙升了87%。这轻松超过了熊市底部的平均反弹反弹，并让基准指数的历史平均年回报率烟消云散。</blockquote></p><p> Yet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.</p><p><blockquote>然而，即使在这些崇高的水平上，华尔街的专业人士也看到了价值。根据华尔街分析师一致的一年价格目标，五只最受欢迎的成长型股票的隐含上涨空间从28%的低点到高达56%不等。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d19c9dd5972bb303415e3fb9e20fb2d4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify: Implied upside of 31%</p><p><blockquote>Shopify：隐含上涨31%</blockquote></p><p> First up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,<b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.</p><p><blockquote>首先是我最喜欢的软件即服务（SaaS）股票，<b>Shopify</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SHOP）。尽管在过去3.5年里上涨了1,000%以上，华尔街认为该公司的股票明年还有31%的上涨空间，达到每股1,434美元。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify为（主要）小型企业提供基于云的电子商务解决方案的运营模式目前再好不过了。尽管Shopify最初与几乎所有其他零售型公司一样受到了疫情的打击，但随着企业改变方向并转向线上，Shopify的电子商务平台很快就会成为合乎逻辑的受益者。结果是2020年其平台交易的商品总值(GMV)增长了96%，达到1196亿美元。过去六年，GMV以77.7%的年复合增长率增长。</blockquote></p><p> What's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes of<b>Walmart</b>&nbsp;and<b>Pinterest</b>to streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify的成功之处在于新商家对该平台的发现以及与主要零售商达成有价值交易的能力。去年使用该平台的消费者数量增长了约52%，达到4.57亿。与此同时，它与<b>沃尔玛</b>和<b>Pinterest</b>简化他们在线销售平台的各个方面。</blockquote></p><p> Shopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.</p><p><blockquote>Shopify从根本上来说并不便宜。但如果它的GMV能够继续以如此疯狂的水平增长，投资者将很乐意支付高额溢价来持有Shopify股票。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df219df7b01fbc2aa008c455f28b99e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Teladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%</p><p><blockquote>Teladoc Health：隐含上涨40%</blockquote></p><p> Telemedicine giant<b>Teladoc Health</b>(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.</p><p><blockquote>远程医疗巨头<b>Teladoc健康</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TDOC）在过去的一年里非常受欢迎，原因显而易见，我稍后会谈到。据华尔街报道，Teladoc的股价在未来12个月内可能会升至250美元以上，隐含上涨空间为40%。</blockquote></p><p> As you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.</p><p><blockquote>可以想象，去年，如果可能的话，医生希望让高危人群和潜在感染患者远离办公室和医院。这导致Teladoc在2020年处理了近1060万次虚拟访问，高于上一年的约410万次。</blockquote></p><p> But understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.</p><p><blockquote>但是要明白，远程医疗是一种改变游戏规则的医疗保健模式，而不仅仅是因为疫情而成为一年的奇迹。这对患者来说要方便得多，允许医生更密切地关注高危患者，而且通常比健康保险公司喜欢的办公室就诊收费更低。这些优势正是Teladoc销售额在2013年至2019年间年均增长74%的原因。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.</p><p><blockquote>此外，可以说，Teladoc还有一个新玩具：它在11月初收购了领先的应用健康信号公司Livongo Health。Livongo依靠人工智能向慢性病患者发送提示和提示。这些轻推帮助患者改变行为，从而过上更健康的生活。Livongo的加入使Teladoc成为名副其实的理所当然的购买对象。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e47e6b6eced3a10e200ffd777619a0c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake: Implied upside of 28%</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake：隐含上涨28%</blockquote></p><p> Another high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing company<b>Snowflake</b>(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街专业人士认为，另一只上涨空间巨大的高增长股票是云数据仓库公司<b>雪花</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SNOW）。在最近回落至历史低点后，分析师预计Snowflake在未来12个月内将上涨28%，达到每股近301美元。</blockquote></p><p> As I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.</p><p><blockquote>正如我在Shopify中提到的，我们正在见证企业在线和云的大力推动，这对大多数云基础设施公司来说都是一个福音。尽管经历了几十年来最严重的经济衰退，Snowflake在2021财年的产品收入仍增长了120%，达到5.538亿美元。尽管目前损失了很多钱，但随着公司的成熟，Snowflake提供的服务应该会产生丰厚的利润。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Arguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.</p><p><blockquote>可以说，Snowflake最有趣的事情是其可持续的竞争优势。例如，它提供了一种现收现付模式，避免了SaaS股票经常觊觎的订阅。通过允许客户根据他们的存储需求和使用的雪花计算点数付费，它提供了一种高度透明且经济高效的运营模式。</blockquote></p><p> Even better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.</p><p><blockquote>更好的是，它的平台位于最流行的云基础设施解决方案之上，这使得信息共享无缝，无论存储提供商是谁。</blockquote></p><p> Snowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.</p><p><blockquote>Snowflake的高估值需要填补一些非常大的空缺，但华尔街相信该公司能够做到这一点。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbafad9e87b7b7dacfefe92d4741b655\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Datadog: Implied upside of 35%</p><p><blockquote>Datadog：隐含上涨35%</blockquote></p><p> Have I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions provider<b>Datadog</b>(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.</p><p><blockquote>我有没有提到华尔街对SaaS股票情有独钟？除了Shopify和Snowflake之外，分析师认为应用监控解决方案提供商<b>Datadog</b>（纳斯达克：DDOG）明年可能飙升至每股121美元。这意味着其股价有高达35%的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> Keeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.</p><p><blockquote>与主题保持一致，Datadog希望从大流行后企业彻底转变战略中受益。随着员工远程工作，企业掌握关键指标、监督关键应用程序并充分了解客户的行为变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。Datadog基于云的解决方案为其客户完成了所有这些工作。</blockquote></p><p> What's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.</p><p><blockquote>Datadog最令人印象深刻的是该公司吸引更大客户的能力。虽然年经常性收入(ARR)至少为100,000美元的客户增加46%是不错的，但令人惊叹的数字是ARR至少为100万美元的客户数量增加了94%。这是该公司2020年销售额猛增66%至6.035亿美元的一个重要原因。</blockquote></p><p> Similar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.</p><p><blockquote>与Snowflake类似，Datadog凭借其高昂的市销率需要证明很多东西。然而，如果它的销售额能够继续以每年30%以上的速度增长，那么华尔街的价格目标就没有理由达不到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99b3853458b2424e2901821012f5502f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p><p><blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote></p><p> Coinbase: Implied upside of 56%</p><p><blockquote>Coinbase：隐含上涨56%</blockquote></p><p> Finally, recent initial public offering<b>Coinbase</b>(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>最后，近期首次公开发行<b>Coinbase</b>（纳斯达克：COIN）在这五家快速增长的公司中提供了最高的上涨空间。尽管上周末只列出了四个目标价，但每股600美元的崇高目标将共识扭曲至每股456美元。这表明Coinbase在未来12个月内可能会上涨56%。</blockquote></p><p> There's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies like<b>Bitcoin</b>and&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!</p><p><blockquote>毫无疑问，Coinbase受益于围绕加密货币的兴奋，例如<b>比特币</b>和<b>以太币</b>.随着今年两者都反弹至新高，Coinbase第一季度营收为18亿美元。在某些情况下，这比过去24个月的收入总和还要多！</blockquote></p><p> However, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与这里列出的其他受欢迎的公司不同，Coinbase的优势充其量看起来很脆弱。它面临着竞争加密货币经纪公司降低其费用的风险，随着时间的推移，这可能会大幅降低其营业利润率和增长率。</blockquote></p><p> Furthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria&nbsp;rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.</p><p><blockquote>此外，它的商业模式看起来是建立在兴奋而不是创新之上的。由于其大部分收入来自比特币和以太币交易，当这些关键资产的价格停止上涨时会发生什么令人担忧。在比特币市值损失80%的两年内，Coinbase的收入几乎减半。</blockquote></p><p> In sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.</p><p><blockquote>总而言之，华尔街可能看好Coinbase，但这个傻瓜却不看好。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SHOP":"Shopify Inc","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","SNOW":"Snowflake","DDOG":"Datadog","TDOC":"Teladoc Health Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138128459","content_text":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-basedS&P 500has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.\nYet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nShopify: Implied upside of 31%\nFirst up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,Shopify(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.\nShopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.\nWhat's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes ofWalmart andPinterestto streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.\nShopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nTeladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%\nTelemedicine giantTeladoc Health(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.\nAs you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.\nBut understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.\nFurthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nSnowflake: Implied upside of 28%\nAnother high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing companySnowflake(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.\nAs I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.\nArguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.\nEven better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.\nSnowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nDatadog: Implied upside of 35%\nHave I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions providerDatadog(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.\nKeeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.\nWhat's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.\nSimilar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nCoinbase: Implied upside of 56%\nFinally, recent initial public offeringCoinbase(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.\nThere's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies likeBitcoinand Ethereum. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!\nHowever, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.\nFurthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.\nIn sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DDOG":0.9,"TDOC":0.9,"COIN":0.9,"SNOW":0.9,"SHOP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":622,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198310782,"gmtCreate":1620925137746,"gmtModify":1634195230283,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Informative read","listText":"Informative read","text":"Informative read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/198310782","repostId":"1116555518","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1470,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191915440,"gmtCreate":1620833123680,"gmtModify":1634195961583,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Red.....","listText":"Red.....","text":"Red.....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/191915440","repostId":"1109603661","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3174,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193940199,"gmtCreate":1620747860711,"gmtModify":1634196609527,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[流泪]&nbsp;","listText":"[流泪]&nbsp;","text":"[流泪]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193940199","repostId":"1171091038","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171091038","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620745886,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1171091038?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-11 23:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Should We Fear, Inflation Is Here<blockquote>我们应该害怕吗，通货膨胀来了</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171091038","media":"zerohedge","summary":"It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech in","content":"<p>It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech investors are taking notice with Monday’s Nasdaq 100 slump the largest since mid-March, while China’s producer prices&nbsp;accelerated&nbsp;overnight.&nbsp;VIX futures are higher with broad risk aversion setting up for European equities to catch up to the late downbeat U.S. session.</p><p><blockquote>无论一个人是否是央行行长，都很难忽视通胀压力。科技投资者正在关注周一纳斯达克100指数创下3月中旬以来最大跌幅，而中国生产者价格隔夜加速上涨。VIX期货走高，因欧洲股市普遍避险情绪升温，赶上美国股市尾盘的悲观行情。</blockquote></p><p> At least investor jitters that rising inflation could lift bond yields, and sap equities’ appeal could take comfort from real yields. The 10-year U.S. inflation-adjusted benchmark tumbled to three-month lows, keeping nominal yields in check as breakevens&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;to multi-year highs.</p><p><blockquote>至少投资者担心通胀上升可能会提高债券收益率，而sap股票的吸引力可能会从实际收益率中得到安慰。美国10年期通胀调整基准指数跌至三个月低点，随着盈亏平衡点跃升至多年高点，名义收益率受到抑制。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8047b97c104b947668ce19b34f7fd4a\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"716\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Financial conditions reached another&nbsp;record, while evidence of stocks’ rotation remains: S&amp;P 500 energy and financials advanced over the past 5 sessions, value is outperforming growth –- particularly in&nbsp;Europe&nbsp;-- and the RTY/NDX is well, steady –- much like 10-year nominal yields around 1.60%.</p><p><blockquote>金融状况再创新高，而股票轮动的证据依然存在：标普500能源和金融股在过去5个交易日中上涨，价值跑赢增长——尤其是在欧洲——RTY/NDX表现良好、稳定——就像10年一样-年名义收益率约为1.60%。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. labor market frictions look to be adding to inflation fears, with JOLTs data, a leading indicator of hiring, likely to signal workers’ growing pricing power. And the NFIB small business optimism will be watched today for supply side constraints –- last month, job openings that were “hard to fill” reached at least a four-decade high. Of course, labor market dislocations remain and a handful of Fed speakers today will no doubt look to assuage inflation fears and discount near-term tapering risks. Not like Bill&nbsp;Dudley.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳动力市场摩擦似乎加剧了通胀担忧，JOLTs数据是招聘的领先指标，可能表明工人的定价能力不断增强。NFIB小企业乐观情绪今天将因供应方面的限制而受到关注——上个月，“难以填补”的职位空缺达到了至少四年来的最高水平。当然，劳动力市场的混乱仍然存在，今天的一些美联储发言人无疑会寻求缓解通胀担忧并淡化近期缩减购债规模的风险。不像比尔·达德利。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98df6b5f32251d558127766afc21fad8\" tg-width=\"1257\" tg-height=\"710\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Whether the Fed falls too far behind the curve remains up for debate. Markets, on the other hand, aren’t as comfortable looking through transitory inflation as evidence builds and expectations climb -- that could become a self-fulfilling prophecy after all.</p><p><blockquote>美联储是否落后太多仍有待商榷。另一方面，随着证据的积累和预期的攀升，市场对暂时性通胀的看法并不那么舒服——这毕竟可能成为一个自我实现的预言。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Should We Fear, Inflation Is Here<blockquote>我们应该害怕吗，通货膨胀来了</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShould We Fear, Inflation Is Here<blockquote>我们应该害怕吗，通货膨胀来了</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-11 23:11</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech investors are taking notice with Monday’s Nasdaq 100 slump the largest since mid-March, while China’s producer prices&nbsp;accelerated&nbsp;overnight.&nbsp;VIX futures are higher with broad risk aversion setting up for European equities to catch up to the late downbeat U.S. session.</p><p><blockquote>无论一个人是否是央行行长，都很难忽视通胀压力。科技投资者正在关注周一纳斯达克100指数创下3月中旬以来最大跌幅，而中国生产者价格隔夜加速上涨。VIX期货走高，因欧洲股市普遍避险情绪升温，赶上美国股市尾盘的悲观行情。</blockquote></p><p> At least investor jitters that rising inflation could lift bond yields, and sap equities’ appeal could take comfort from real yields. The 10-year U.S. inflation-adjusted benchmark tumbled to three-month lows, keeping nominal yields in check as breakevens&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;to multi-year highs.</p><p><blockquote>至少投资者担心通胀上升可能会提高债券收益率，而sap股票的吸引力可能会从实际收益率中得到安慰。美国10年期通胀调整基准指数跌至三个月低点，随着盈亏平衡点跃升至多年高点，名义收益率受到抑制。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8047b97c104b947668ce19b34f7fd4a\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"716\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Financial conditions reached another&nbsp;record, while evidence of stocks’ rotation remains: S&amp;P 500 energy and financials advanced over the past 5 sessions, value is outperforming growth –- particularly in&nbsp;Europe&nbsp;-- and the RTY/NDX is well, steady –- much like 10-year nominal yields around 1.60%.</p><p><blockquote>金融状况再创新高，而股票轮动的证据依然存在：标普500能源和金融股在过去5个交易日中上涨，价值跑赢增长——尤其是在欧洲——RTY/NDX表现良好、稳定——就像10年一样-年名义收益率约为1.60%。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. labor market frictions look to be adding to inflation fears, with JOLTs data, a leading indicator of hiring, likely to signal workers’ growing pricing power. And the NFIB small business optimism will be watched today for supply side constraints –- last month, job openings that were “hard to fill” reached at least a four-decade high. Of course, labor market dislocations remain and a handful of Fed speakers today will no doubt look to assuage inflation fears and discount near-term tapering risks. Not like Bill&nbsp;Dudley.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳动力市场摩擦似乎加剧了通胀担忧，JOLTs数据是招聘的领先指标，可能表明工人的定价能力不断增强。NFIB小企业乐观情绪今天将因供应方面的限制而受到关注——上个月，“难以填补”的职位空缺达到了至少四年来的最高水平。当然，劳动力市场的混乱仍然存在，今天的一些美联储发言人无疑会寻求缓解通胀担忧并淡化近期缩减购债规模的风险。不像比尔·达德利。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98df6b5f32251d558127766afc21fad8\" tg-width=\"1257\" tg-height=\"710\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Whether the Fed falls too far behind the curve remains up for debate. Markets, on the other hand, aren’t as comfortable looking through transitory inflation as evidence builds and expectations climb -- that could become a self-fulfilling prophecy after all.</p><p><blockquote>美联储是否落后太多仍有待商榷。另一方面，随着证据的积累和预期的攀升，市场对暂时性通胀的看法并不那么舒服——这毕竟可能成为一个自我实现的预言。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/should-we-fear-inflation-here\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/should-we-fear-inflation-here","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171091038","content_text":"It’s becoming hard to ignore inflationary pressures, whether one is a central banker or not. Tech investors are taking notice with Monday’s Nasdaq 100 slump the largest since mid-March, while China’s producer prices accelerated overnight. VIX futures are higher with broad risk aversion setting up for European equities to catch up to the late downbeat U.S. session.\nAt least investor jitters that rising inflation could lift bond yields, and sap equities’ appeal could take comfort from real yields. The 10-year U.S. inflation-adjusted benchmark tumbled to three-month lows, keeping nominal yields in check as breakevens jumped to multi-year highs.\n\nFinancial conditions reached another record, while evidence of stocks’ rotation remains: S&P 500 energy and financials advanced over the past 5 sessions, value is outperforming growth –- particularly in Europe -- and the RTY/NDX is well, steady –- much like 10-year nominal yields around 1.60%.\nU.S. labor market frictions look to be adding to inflation fears, with JOLTs data, a leading indicator of hiring, likely to signal workers’ growing pricing power. And the NFIB small business optimism will be watched today for supply side constraints –- last month, job openings that were “hard to fill” reached at least a four-decade high. Of course, labor market dislocations remain and a handful of Fed speakers today will no doubt look to assuage inflation fears and discount near-term tapering risks. Not like Bill Dudley.\n\nWhether the Fed falls too far behind the curve remains up for debate. Markets, on the other hand, aren’t as comfortable looking through transitory inflation as evidence builds and expectations climb -- that could become a self-fulfilling prophecy after all.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1935,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":106713370,"gmtCreate":1620144731590,"gmtModify":1634207457908,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Omg&nbsp;","listText":"Omg&nbsp;","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106713370","repostId":"1195636027","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195636027","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620137110,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1195636027?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-04 22:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes<blockquote>“事情可能会变得奇怪”：随着“极端”负面伽马来袭，股市呕吐</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195636027","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking d","content":"<p>Just like late February when we had the first<i>inflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,</i>Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.</p><p><blockquote>就像二月下旬我们第一次<i>通胀恐慌兼财政部发脾气，</i>科技正在崩溃，只要看看亚马逊就能找到证据。</blockquote></p><p> In just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.</p><p><blockquote>自公布井喷的第一季度收益使其股价创下历史新高以来的短短三天内，亚马逊股价已下跌超过9%，并处于调整的边缘。其他FAAMG，尤其是苹果，其季度表现同样令人印象深刻，但情况也好不到哪里去。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c89d66b1ced8ac68b5fb3ff40b54f134\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"240\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> However, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与2月底科技股主要因收益率大幅飙升而遭受重创不同，这一次出现了深度负伽马的双重打击。</blockquote></p><p> AsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY &amp; QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"</p><p><blockquote>AsSpotGamma隔夜写道：“SPDR标普500指数ETF和QQQ均仍处于负伽马区域，这意味着相对波动性较高。”</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has<b>\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"</b>The details:</p><p><blockquote>野村证券的x-asset常驻专家Chalie McElligott指出了这一点，并在今天早上的一份报告中写道，虽然“没有什么东西本身非常庞大或‘鲸鱼般’”，但有<b>“最近几周，客户的成交量/伽马销量有所回升。”</b>详细信息：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>This has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…<b>all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&amp;P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200</b></li>  <li>The %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,<b>Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile</b></li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dbb4e73ce8bc66785a7aa43170b3dc3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"648\">Needless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,<b>we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well</b>(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>这通过单打和指数中的标准覆盖流得到了体现，也通过上周媒体中提到的系统性扼杀抛售得到了体现（这看起来像是每周交易约3-4倍的比率的奇数流，同时也有例如，一个月内单独的每日覆盖程序跨越）……<b>所有这些都导致了交易商的“长伽马”动态——因此标准普尔指数“停滞”了大约三周，围绕4150-4200点的大罢工的严重性</b></li><li>在最近到期后，整个美国股票指数的整体$伽马幅度的%ile排名已经下降（SPX/SPDR标普500指数ETF合并现在为56.6%ile$伽马/IWM 35.9%ile；EEM 37.4%ile）；然而，<b>纳斯达克/QQQ仍然是广泛指数走势可能变得奇怪的中心，其伽马值为-4.358亿美元，极负，仅为3.8%</b></li></ul>不用说，负面的QQQ gamma+科技抛售=爆炸性组合，正如McElligott总结的那样，“随着QQQ中这种‘极端’的负面$Gamma，<b>我们看到交易商也越来越多地进入“空头伽马vs现货”领域</b>（伽马“中性线”339.36 vs现货333.55）；同样，我们目前在IWM（226.19“中性线”vs 224.79现货）和EEM（54.29“中性线”vs现货53.59）中也看到交易商“做空Gamma vs现货”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7be1b134edacd8fc5831a10f026c1d2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"311\">Tech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"</p><p><blockquote>科技股无法突破走高削弱了市场情绪，正如野村量化总结的那样，继4月份科技股强劲复苏和“长期增长”（得益于UST的稳定和相对“牛市趋于平缓”）3月份利率抛售/“熊市加剧”的极端情况）“我们的野村行业情绪分析显示，哇，我们看到科技行业情绪（再次）崩溃——一周前ile得分为85.1%，但今天降至53.9%”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/938a77b986fc7fbbd0450254e29b7dce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"277\">And as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...</p><p><blockquote>随着对科技的厌恶蔓延，拖累纳斯达克走低……</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35406354f6f369f0aa382d819a26ea4e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"260\">... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&amp;P and Russell...</p><p><blockquote>...它开始冲击更广泛的指数，例如S&amp;P和罗素...</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d50bd11171fa55adf45caf3cf0ab389\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"285\">... which just dipped below its 50dma.</p><p><blockquote>...刚刚跌破50日均线。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b8200d703a1c2d305811eadd35af3c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"227\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes<blockquote>“事情可能会变得奇怪”：随着“极端”负面伽马来袭，股市呕吐</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes<blockquote>“事情可能会变得奇怪”：随着“极端”负面伽马来袭，股市呕吐</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-04 22:05</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Just like late February when we had the first<i>inflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,</i>Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.</p><p><blockquote>就像二月下旬我们第一次<i>通胀恐慌兼财政部发脾气，</i>科技正在崩溃，只要看看亚马逊就能找到证据。</blockquote></p><p> In just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.</p><p><blockquote>自公布井喷的第一季度收益使其股价创下历史新高以来的短短三天内，亚马逊股价已下跌超过9%，并处于调整的边缘。其他FAAMG，尤其是苹果，其季度表现同样令人印象深刻，但情况也好不到哪里去。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c89d66b1ced8ac68b5fb3ff40b54f134\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"240\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> However, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.</p><p><blockquote>然而，与2月底科技股主要因收益率大幅飙升而遭受重创不同，这一次出现了深度负伽马的双重打击。</blockquote></p><p> AsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY &amp; QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"</p><p><blockquote>AsSpotGamma隔夜写道：“SPDR标普500指数ETF和QQQ均仍处于负伽马区域，这意味着相对波动性较高。”</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has<b>\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"</b>The details:</p><p><blockquote>野村证券的x-asset常驻专家Chalie McElligott指出了这一点，并在今天早上的一份报告中写道，虽然“没有什么东西本身非常庞大或‘鲸鱼般’”，但有<b>“最近几周，客户的成交量/伽马销量有所回升。”</b>详细信息：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>This has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…<b>all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&amp;P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200</b></li>  <li>The %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,<b>Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile</b></li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dbb4e73ce8bc66785a7aa43170b3dc3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"648\">Needless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,<b>we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well</b>(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>这通过单打和指数中的标准覆盖流得到了体现，也通过上周媒体中提到的系统性扼杀抛售得到了体现（这看起来像是每周交易约3-4倍的比率的奇数流，同时也有例如，一个月内单独的每日覆盖程序跨越）……<b>所有这些都导致了交易商的“长伽马”动态——因此标准普尔指数“停滞”了大约三周，围绕4150-4200点的大罢工的严重性</b></li><li>在最近到期后，整个美国股票指数的整体$伽马幅度的%ile排名已经下降（SPX/SPDR标普500指数ETF合并现在为56.6%ile$伽马/IWM 35.9%ile；EEM 37.4%ile）；然而，<b>纳斯达克/QQQ仍然是广泛指数走势可能变得奇怪的中心，其伽马值为-4.358亿美元，极负，仅为3.8%</b></li></ul>不用说，负面的QQQ gamma+科技抛售=爆炸性组合，正如McElligott总结的那样，“随着QQQ中这种‘极端’的负面$Gamma，<b>我们看到交易商也越来越多地进入“空头伽马vs现货”领域</b>（伽马“中性线”339.36 vs现货333.55）；同样，我们目前在IWM（226.19“中性线”vs 224.79现货）和EEM（54.29“中性线”vs现货53.59）中也看到交易商“做空Gamma vs现货”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7be1b134edacd8fc5831a10f026c1d2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"311\">Tech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"</p><p><blockquote>科技股无法突破走高削弱了市场情绪，正如野村量化总结的那样，继4月份科技股强劲复苏和“长期增长”（得益于UST的稳定和相对“牛市趋于平缓”）3月份利率抛售/“熊市加剧”的极端情况）“我们的野村行业情绪分析显示，哇，我们看到科技行业情绪（再次）崩溃——一周前ile得分为85.1%，但今天降至53.9%”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/938a77b986fc7fbbd0450254e29b7dce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"277\">And as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...</p><p><blockquote>随着对科技的厌恶蔓延，拖累纳斯达克走低……</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35406354f6f369f0aa382d819a26ea4e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"260\">... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&amp;P and Russell...</p><p><blockquote>...它开始冲击更广泛的指数，例如S&amp;P和罗素...</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d50bd11171fa55adf45caf3cf0ab389\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"285\">... which just dipped below its 50dma.</p><p><blockquote>...刚刚跌破50日均线。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b8200d703a1c2d305811eadd35af3c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"227\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195636027","content_text":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.\nIn just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.\n\nHowever, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.\nAsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY & QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"\nNomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"The details:\n\nThis has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200\nThe %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile\n\nNeedless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"\nTech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"\nAnd as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...\n... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&P and Russell...\n... which just dipped below its 50dma.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1471,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106708147,"gmtCreate":1620142797889,"gmtModify":1634207478322,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","listText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","text":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106708147","repostId":"1142616846","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2840,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198319589,"gmtCreate":1620925209241,"gmtModify":1634195230163,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stuck","listText":"Stuck","text":"Stuck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/198319589","repostId":"1196862271","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196862271","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620919313,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1196862271?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-13 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively<blockquote>上两次股市分别下跌了20%和50%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196862271","media":"zerohedge","summary":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a","content":"<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.</p><p><blockquote>在我们的上一篇文章中，我概述了通胀上升如何导致科技股下跌。</blockquote></p><p> By way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.</p><p><blockquote>快速回顾一下，以纳斯达克为代表的科技股对通胀高度敏感，呈反比关系：当通胀上升时，科技股暴跌，当通胀下降时，科技股飙升。</blockquote></p><p> The reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.</p><p><blockquote>原因是大部分科技投资都是基于增长率。如果债券收益率因通货膨胀而上升，债券作为一种投资就会变得更具吸引力，从而削弱科技的吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> As I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).</p><p><blockquote>正如我昨天提到的。随着通胀在2020年进入金融体系并在2021年开始加速，科技股陷入困境。您可以在下面的图表中看到这一点（红色矩形）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6366a605a86374ef9af9de07ae828fd4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"606\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">So, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&amp;P 500? Will it collapse too?</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们知道，随着通胀升温，科技将难以前进。但是像标普500这样的大盘呢？它也会崩溃吗？</blockquote></p><p> To figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>为了弄清楚这一点，让我们来看看美国最近两次通胀恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> The most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.</p><p><blockquote>最近一次恐慌发生在2010-2011年。当时，美联储很快就采取了行动，并决定结束其QE 2计划（通胀飙升的原因）。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.</p><p><blockquote>美联储随后等待了几个月才推出任何新的货币计划。当它真的推出时，它并不涉及印钞（相反，美联储通过一个名为“扭曲操作”的过程使用国债销售收益购买长期国债）。这是一种隐形收紧。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.</p><p><blockquote>股市不喜欢这样，暴跌近20%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fdf95bc30276d330c4bd7a5f62b10d2\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Bear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.</p><p><blockquote>请记住，这是一次相对较小的通胀恐慌。在20世纪70-80年代最后一次合理的通胀风暴期间。</blockquote></p><p> During that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).</p><p><blockquote>在这场混乱中，美联储被迫更加积极地收紧货币政策，启动了两项激进的紧缩计划。值得注意的是，这引发了两次严重的衰退（阴影区域）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f6ed1ada17beb2066d0017b576e64cc\" tg-width=\"1168\" tg-height=\"450\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> This IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b38c35b81a872044b03ce49014d5e46\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote>这导致股市崩溃，导致18个月内下跌约50%。</blockquote></p><p> So, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?</p><p><blockquote>那么，这次会是什么呢？美联储会像2011年那样进行秘密缩减……还是会像上世纪七八十年代那样大幅收紧货币政策？</blockquote></p><p> We’ll address that in our next article.</p><p><blockquote>我们将在下一篇文章中讨论这个问题。</blockquote></p><p> in the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation&nbsp;<b>pay you</b>&nbsp;as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，我们刚刚发布了一份特别投资报告，内容涉及可以用来制造通货膨胀的五种秘密投资<b>付给你</b>随着它在未来几个月席卷金融体系。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively<blockquote>上两次股市分别下跌了20%和50%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively<blockquote>上两次股市分别下跌了20%和50%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-13 23:21</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.</p><p><blockquote>在我们的上一篇文章中，我概述了通胀上升如何导致科技股下跌。</blockquote></p><p> By way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.</p><p><blockquote>快速回顾一下，以纳斯达克为代表的科技股对通胀高度敏感，呈反比关系：当通胀上升时，科技股暴跌，当通胀下降时，科技股飙升。</blockquote></p><p> The reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.</p><p><blockquote>原因是大部分科技投资都是基于增长率。如果债券收益率因通货膨胀而上升，债券作为一种投资就会变得更具吸引力，从而削弱科技的吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> As I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).</p><p><blockquote>正如我昨天提到的。随着通胀在2020年进入金融体系并在2021年开始加速，科技股陷入困境。您可以在下面的图表中看到这一点（红色矩形）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6366a605a86374ef9af9de07ae828fd4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"606\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">So, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&amp;P 500? Will it collapse too?</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们知道，随着通胀升温，科技将难以前进。但是像标普500这样的大盘呢？它也会崩溃吗？</blockquote></p><p> To figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>为了弄清楚这一点，让我们来看看美国最近两次通胀恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> The most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.</p><p><blockquote>最近一次恐慌发生在2010-2011年。当时，美联储很快就采取了行动，并决定结束其QE 2计划（通胀飙升的原因）。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.</p><p><blockquote>美联储随后等待了几个月才推出任何新的货币计划。当它真的推出时，它并不涉及印钞（相反，美联储通过一个名为“扭曲操作”的过程使用国债销售收益购买长期国债）。这是一种隐形收紧。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.</p><p><blockquote>股市不喜欢这样，暴跌近20%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fdf95bc30276d330c4bd7a5f62b10d2\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Bear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.</p><p><blockquote>请记住，这是一次相对较小的通胀恐慌。在20世纪70-80年代最后一次合理的通胀风暴期间。</blockquote></p><p> During that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).</p><p><blockquote>在这场混乱中，美联储被迫更加积极地收紧货币政策，启动了两项激进的紧缩计划。值得注意的是，这引发了两次严重的衰退（阴影区域）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f6ed1ada17beb2066d0017b576e64cc\" tg-width=\"1168\" tg-height=\"450\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> This IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b38c35b81a872044b03ce49014d5e46\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p><p><blockquote>这导致股市崩溃，导致18个月内下跌约50%。</blockquote></p><p> So, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?</p><p><blockquote>那么，这次会是什么呢？美联储会像2011年那样进行秘密缩减……还是会像上世纪七八十年代那样大幅收紧货币政策？</blockquote></p><p> We’ll address that in our next article.</p><p><blockquote>我们将在下一篇文章中讨论这个问题。</blockquote></p><p> in the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation&nbsp;<b>pay you</b>&nbsp;as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，我们刚刚发布了一份特别投资报告，内容涉及可以用来制造通货膨胀的五种秘密投资<b>付给你</b>随着它在未来几个月席卷金融体系。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196862271","content_text":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.\nThe reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.\nAs I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).\nSo, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&P 500? Will it collapse too?\nTo figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.\nThe most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.\nThe Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.\nStocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.\n\nBear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.\nDuring that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).\n\nThis IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.\nSo, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?\nWe’ll address that in our next article.\nin the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation pay you as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1577,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193954396,"gmtCreate":1620747711515,"gmtModify":1634196610941,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","listText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","text":"Oh mannnn..worrying","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193954396","repostId":"1185197052","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1902,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}