+关注
DavidDarren
暂无个人介绍
IP属地：未知
4
关注
0
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
DavidDarren
2021-03-24
Wow
Why These Marijuana Stocks Tanked on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么这些大麻股票周二暴跌</blockquote>
DavidDarren
2021-06-26
Okay
Kyle Bass Slams Fed, Sees Inflation Everywhere He Looks<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯猛烈抨击美联储，随处可见通胀</blockquote>
DavidDarren
2021-06-26
Too corrupted
抱歉，原内容已删除
DavidDarren
2021-06-26
Yayyy
抱歉，原内容已删除
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577086012713886","uuid":"3577086012713886","gmtCreate":1613991993572,"gmtModify":1616578586663,"name":"DavidDarren","pinyin":"daviddarren","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.09","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"60.27%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":125937102,"gmtCreate":1624640460506,"gmtModify":1633950141634,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125937102","repostId":"1134836867","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134836867","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624634837,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1134836867?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-25 23:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Kyle Bass Slams Fed, Sees Inflation Everywhere He Looks<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯猛烈抨击美联储，随处可见通胀</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134836867","media":"zerohedge","summary":"With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to th","content":"<p>With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to the latest inflation numbers,Hayman Capital's Kyle Bass returned to CNBCfor an interview with the \"Closing Bell\" crew on Thursday, where he offered a dramatically different vision of the present economic scenario vis-a-vis inflation.</p><p><blockquote>随着市场似乎对FOMC对最新通胀数据的反应不屑一顾，美国股市重回历史高位，海曼资本(Hayman Capital)的凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)周四回到CNBC接受“收盘钟声”工作人员的采访，他在采访中提出了截然不同的观点当前经济形势与通货膨胀的关系。</blockquote></p><p> Inan interview where heexpounded upon his claim that the US is already grappling with real inflation rates above 10%, the billionaire investor proclaimed that \"in every single aspect of life, I see inflation.\"</p><p><blockquote>在接受采访时，这位亿万富翁投资者阐述了他关于美国已经在努力应对超过10%的实际通胀率的说法，他宣称“在生活的各个方面，我都看到了通货膨胀。”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1d2089581ea201564daaba8b5aac961\" tg-width=\"521\" tg-height=\"310\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Why? Because during the past year and a half, the Fed has introduced more broad money into the American economy in the shortest time than we have seen at any point in American history.</p><p><blockquote>为什么？因为在过去一年半的时间里，美联储在最短的时间内向美国经济引入了比美国历史上任何时候都多的广义货币。</blockquote></p><p> \"I think look we're going to see a short-term turn-down in inflation because the initial inflationary burst was enormous...this transitory comment may play out to be true for a short period of time but I hink Sarah when you look at the the money supply the broad money in the US system from 1980 to 2010 it it vacillated between 50% and 60% of GDP and post the global financial crisis it moved up from roughly 60% to 68% 69% of GDP now that we're approaching 90 so in the one year period one and a half year period since COVID started we have introduced 34% more broad money in our system in the shortest time period in the history United States so we're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the fed continues to expand its balance sheet,\" Bass said. Even as the financial press prattles on about the significance of the Fed finally starting to consider tapering its asset purchases, Bass believes that the central bank won't be able to shrink its balance sheet so easily.</p><p><blockquote>“我认为我们将看到通胀短期下降，因为最初的通胀爆发是巨大的。..这种短暂的评论可能在短时间内是正确的，但我认为莎拉，当你看看1980年至2010年美国体系中的货币供应量时，它在GDP的50%至60%之间波动，在全球金融危机后，它占GDP的比例从大约60%上升到68%69%，现在我们已经接近90%，所以在新冠疫情爆发以来的一年半时间里，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内引入了34%的广义货币，所以如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移而走高。尽管金融媒体喋喋不休地谈论美联储最终开始考虑缩减资产购买规模的重要性，巴斯认为央行不会那么容易缩减资产负债表。</blockquote></p><p> \"We're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the Fed continues to expand its balance sheet which I think it will,\" Bass said. So, what can investors do to fight this \"inflation monster\", as Bass colorfully described it. Well, he suggested they focus on hard assets like commodities and real estate,which BlackRock is already buying up in droves.</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示：“如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移走高，我认为会这样做。”那么，投资者可以做些什么来对抗这个巴斯生动描述的“通胀怪物”呢？嗯，他建议他们关注大宗商品和房地产等硬资产，贝莱德已经在大量购买这些资产。</blockquote></p><p> Equities should \"do fine\", Bass said, citing data purporting to show that equity prices keep up with between 95% and 88% of inflation over the long term (though that certainly doesn't seem to fit the last decade).</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示，股市应该“表现良好”，他引用的数据似乎表明，从长远来看，股价能够跟上95%至88%的通胀率（尽管这似乎肯定不符合过去十年的情况）。</blockquote></p><p> As for his assessment of inflation and its dramatic difference with the Fed's view, Bass quipped: \"Your bank account is the final determinant whether there is inflation or not,\" he concluded, highlighting the higher prices consumers have seen for things like food and cars.\"</p><p><blockquote>至于他对通胀的评估及其与美联储观点的巨大差异，巴斯打趣道：“你的银行账户是是否存在通胀的最终决定因素，”他总结道，并强调了消费者看到的食品和汽车等商品的价格上涨。”</blockquote></p><p> \"If you're in the market place you want to own commodities if you’re in the real world you want to own productive real estate you even want to buy rural land in front of major demographic moves in the US...I’d rather own hard assets than equities today because I think we’re only seeing just the beginning of population moves in the US.\" </p><p><blockquote>“如果你在市场上，你想拥有大宗商品，如果你在现实世界中，你想拥有生产性房地产，你甚至想在美国人口发生重大变化之前购买农村土地……我宁愿今天拥有硬资产而不是股票，因为我认为我们只看到美国人口流动的开始。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Kyle Bass Slams Fed, Sees Inflation Everywhere He Looks<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯猛烈抨击美联储，随处可见通胀</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nKyle Bass Slams Fed, Sees Inflation Everywhere He Looks<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯猛烈抨击美联储，随处可见通胀</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-25 23:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to the latest inflation numbers,Hayman Capital's Kyle Bass returned to CNBCfor an interview with the \"Closing Bell\" crew on Thursday, where he offered a dramatically different vision of the present economic scenario vis-a-vis inflation.</p><p><blockquote>随着市场似乎对FOMC对最新通胀数据的反应不屑一顾，美国股市重回历史高位，海曼资本(Hayman Capital)的凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)周四回到CNBC接受“收盘钟声”工作人员的采访，他在采访中提出了截然不同的观点当前经济形势与通货膨胀的关系。</blockquote></p><p> Inan interview where heexpounded upon his claim that the US is already grappling with real inflation rates above 10%, the billionaire investor proclaimed that \"in every single aspect of life, I see inflation.\"</p><p><blockquote>在接受采访时，这位亿万富翁投资者阐述了他关于美国已经在努力应对超过10%的实际通胀率的说法，他宣称“在生活的各个方面，我都看到了通货膨胀。”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1d2089581ea201564daaba8b5aac961\" tg-width=\"521\" tg-height=\"310\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Why? Because during the past year and a half, the Fed has introduced more broad money into the American economy in the shortest time than we have seen at any point in American history.</p><p><blockquote>为什么？因为在过去一年半的时间里，美联储在最短的时间内向美国经济引入了比美国历史上任何时候都多的广义货币。</blockquote></p><p> \"I think look we're going to see a short-term turn-down in inflation because the initial inflationary burst was enormous...this transitory comment may play out to be true for a short period of time but I hink Sarah when you look at the the money supply the broad money in the US system from 1980 to 2010 it it vacillated between 50% and 60% of GDP and post the global financial crisis it moved up from roughly 60% to 68% 69% of GDP now that we're approaching 90 so in the one year period one and a half year period since COVID started we have introduced 34% more broad money in our system in the shortest time period in the history United States so we're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the fed continues to expand its balance sheet,\" Bass said. Even as the financial press prattles on about the significance of the Fed finally starting to consider tapering its asset purchases, Bass believes that the central bank won't be able to shrink its balance sheet so easily.</p><p><blockquote>“我认为我们将看到通胀短期下降，因为最初的通胀爆发是巨大的。..这种短暂的评论可能在短时间内是正确的，但我认为莎拉，当你看看1980年至2010年美国体系中的货币供应量时，它在GDP的50%至60%之间波动，在全球金融危机后，它占GDP的比例从大约60%上升到68%69%，现在我们已经接近90%，所以在新冠疫情爆发以来的一年半时间里，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内引入了34%的广义货币，所以如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移而走高。尽管金融媒体喋喋不休地谈论美联储最终开始考虑缩减资产购买规模的重要性，巴斯认为央行不会那么容易缩减资产负债表。</blockquote></p><p> \"We're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the Fed continues to expand its balance sheet which I think it will,\" Bass said. So, what can investors do to fight this \"inflation monster\", as Bass colorfully described it. Well, he suggested they focus on hard assets like commodities and real estate,which BlackRock is already buying up in droves.</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示：“如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移走高，我认为会这样做。”那么，投资者可以做些什么来对抗这个巴斯生动描述的“通胀怪物”呢？嗯，他建议他们关注大宗商品和房地产等硬资产，贝莱德已经在大量购买这些资产。</blockquote></p><p> Equities should \"do fine\", Bass said, citing data purporting to show that equity prices keep up with between 95% and 88% of inflation over the long term (though that certainly doesn't seem to fit the last decade).</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示，股市应该“表现良好”，他引用的数据似乎表明，从长远来看，股价能够跟上95%至88%的通胀率（尽管这似乎肯定不符合过去十年的情况）。</blockquote></p><p> As for his assessment of inflation and its dramatic difference with the Fed's view, Bass quipped: \"Your bank account is the final determinant whether there is inflation or not,\" he concluded, highlighting the higher prices consumers have seen for things like food and cars.\"</p><p><blockquote>至于他对通胀的评估及其与美联储观点的巨大差异，巴斯打趣道：“你的银行账户是是否存在通胀的最终决定因素，”他总结道，并强调了消费者看到的食品和汽车等商品的价格上涨。”</blockquote></p><p> \"If you're in the market place you want to own commodities if you’re in the real world you want to own productive real estate you even want to buy rural land in front of major demographic moves in the US...I’d rather own hard assets than equities today because I think we’re only seeing just the beginning of population moves in the US.\" </p><p><blockquote>“如果你在市场上，你想拥有大宗商品，如果你在现实世界中，你想拥有生产性房地产，你甚至想在美国人口发生重大变化之前购买农村土地……我宁愿今天拥有硬资产而不是股票，因为我认为我们只看到美国人口流动的开始。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/kyle-bass-warns-every-aspect-my-life-i-see-inflation?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/kyle-bass-warns-every-aspect-my-life-i-see-inflation?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134836867","content_text":"With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to the latest inflation numbers,Hayman Capital's Kyle Bass returned to CNBCfor an interview with the \"Closing Bell\" crew on Thursday, where he offered a dramatically different vision of the present economic scenario vis-a-vis inflation.\nInan interview where heexpounded upon his claim that the US is already grappling with real inflation rates above 10%, the billionaire investor proclaimed that \"in every single aspect of life, I see inflation.\"\n\nWhy? Because during the past year and a half, the Fed has introduced more broad money into the American economy in the shortest time than we have seen at any point in American history.\n\n \"I think look we're going to see a short-term turn-down in inflation because the initial inflationary burst was enormous...this transitory comment may play out to be true for a short period of time but I hink Sarah when you look at the the money supply the broad money in the US system from 1980 to 2010 it it vacillated between 50% and 60% of GDP and post the global financial crisis it moved up from roughly 60% to 68% 69% of GDP now that we're approaching 90 so in the one year period one and a half year period since COVID started we have introduced 34% more broad money in our system in the shortest time period in the history United States so we're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the fed continues to expand its balance sheet,\" Bass said.\n\nEven as the financial press prattles on about the significance of the Fed finally starting to consider tapering its asset purchases, Bass believes that the central bank won't be able to shrink its balance sheet so easily.\n\n \"We're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the Fed continues to expand its balance sheet which I think it will,\" Bass said.\n\nSo, what can investors do to fight this \"inflation monster\", as Bass colorfully described it. Well, he suggested they focus on hard assets like commodities and real estate,which BlackRock is already buying up in droves.\nEquities should \"do fine\", Bass said, citing data purporting to show that equity prices keep up with between 95% and 88% of inflation over the long term (though that certainly doesn't seem to fit the last decade).\nAs for his assessment of inflation and its dramatic difference with the Fed's view, Bass quipped: \"Your bank account is the final determinant whether there is inflation or not,\" he concluded, highlighting the higher prices consumers have seen for things like food and cars.\"\n\n \"If you're in the market place you want to own commodities if you’re in the real world you want to own productive real estate you even want to buy rural land in front of major demographic moves in the US...I’d rather own hard assets than equities today because I think we’re only seeing just the beginning of population moves in the US.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":894,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125935089,"gmtCreate":1624640352341,"gmtModify":1633950142675,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Too corrupted ","listText":"Too corrupted ","text":"Too corrupted","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125935089","repostId":"1198438276","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1006,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125932283,"gmtCreate":1624640323642,"gmtModify":1633950143041,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yayyy","listText":"Yayyy","text":"Yayyy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125932283","repostId":"2146072291","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":705,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351181908,"gmtCreate":1616575088704,"gmtModify":1634525131116,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351181908","repostId":"1190328220","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190328220","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616573860,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1190328220?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 16:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why These Marijuana Stocks Tanked on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么这些大麻股票周二暴跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190328220","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly","content":"<p>A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly by investors.</p><p><blockquote>该行业立法方面看似积极的进展并没有受到投资者的热烈欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> Talk about a buzzkill: The latest news on marijuana reform didn't go over well with cannabis stock investors. On Tuesday, they sold off many sector favorites, including <b>Aprhria</b>(NASDAQ:APHA),<b>Aurora Cannabis</b>(NYSE:ACB),<b>OrganiGram Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:OGI),<b>HEXO</b>(NYSE:HEXO), and <b>Curaleaf Holdings</b>(OTC:CURLF). All fell at rates ranging from 3.4% to 4.5%. Meanwhile, multistate operator <b>Green Thumb Industries</b>(OTC:GTBIF) really took it on the chin, declining 8.4%.</p><p><blockquote>谈论扫兴：大麻改革的最新消息并没有受到大麻股票投资者的欢迎。周二，他们抛售了许多行业热门股票，包括<b>阿普里亚</b>（纳斯达克：APHA），<b>奥罗拉大麻</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：ACB），<b>OrganiGram控股</b>（纳斯达克：OGI），<b>己糖</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：HEXO），以及<b>库拉利夫控股</b>（场外交易代码：CURLF）。跌幅均在3.4%至4.5%之间。同时，多状态算子<b>绿拇指工业</b>（场外交易代码：GTBIF）真的很沮丧，下跌了8.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> There was little news of any consequence from those companies. Rather, it seems that investors are reacting to one development in Washington that's encouraging on its surface. Following a similar move in the House of Representatives last week, Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, and his Republican counterpart Steve Daines of Montana have reintroduced the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司几乎没有任何后果的消息。相反，投资者似乎正在对华盛顿表面上令人鼓舞的事态发展做出反应。继上周众议院采取类似举措后，俄勒冈州民主党参议员杰夫·默克利和蒙大拿州共和党参议员史蒂夫·戴恩斯在参议院重新提出了《安全银行法》。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad0432cd677182be13f1af6415e6d71c\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1335\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> But Democrats, who tend to support marijuana reform measures, only control the Senate these days because of the potential tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Senate filibuster is still available to Republicans (who clearly intend to do their best to scotch Democrat initiatives). That means the SAFE Banking Act -- which would protect financial institutions in legalized states that want to offer basic banking services to marijuana businesses -- currently looks like a nonstarter there.</p><p><blockquote>但倾向于支持大麻改革措施的民主党人最近只控制了参议院，因为副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）可能会投出打破平局的票，共和党人仍然可以利用参议院的阻挠议事（他们显然打算尽最大努力阻止民主党的倡议）。这意味着《安全银行法》——该法案将保护希望向大麻企业提供基本银行服务的合法化州的金融机构——目前看起来在那里是行不通的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> So the one-step-forward-and-two-steps-back lurch of U.S. marijuana reform continues. But shareholders of Aprhia, Aurora, and their fellow cannabis stocks shouldn't be discouraged. Momentum still favors progress, as witnessed by the recent recreational-legalization switch thrown by Virginia. Believers in the future of corporate weed should stay the course.</p><p><blockquote>因此，美国大麻改革的前一步后退两步仍在继续。但Aprhia、Aurora及其大麻股票同行的股东不应气馁。势头仍然有利于进步，正如弗吉尼亚州最近抛出的娱乐合法化开关所见证的那样。相信企业大麻未来的人应该坚持到底。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why These Marijuana Stocks Tanked on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么这些大麻股票周二暴跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy These Marijuana Stocks Tanked on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么这些大麻股票周二暴跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-24 16:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly by investors.</p><p><blockquote>该行业立法方面看似积极的进展并没有受到投资者的热烈欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> Talk about a buzzkill: The latest news on marijuana reform didn't go over well with cannabis stock investors. On Tuesday, they sold off many sector favorites, including <b>Aprhria</b>(NASDAQ:APHA),<b>Aurora Cannabis</b>(NYSE:ACB),<b>OrganiGram Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:OGI),<b>HEXO</b>(NYSE:HEXO), and <b>Curaleaf Holdings</b>(OTC:CURLF). All fell at rates ranging from 3.4% to 4.5%. Meanwhile, multistate operator <b>Green Thumb Industries</b>(OTC:GTBIF) really took it on the chin, declining 8.4%.</p><p><blockquote>谈论扫兴：大麻改革的最新消息并没有受到大麻股票投资者的欢迎。周二，他们抛售了许多行业热门股票，包括<b>阿普里亚</b>（纳斯达克：APHA），<b>奥罗拉大麻</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：ACB），<b>OrganiGram控股</b>（纳斯达克：OGI），<b>己糖</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：HEXO），以及<b>库拉利夫控股</b>（场外交易代码：CURLF）。跌幅均在3.4%至4.5%之间。同时，多状态算子<b>绿拇指工业</b>（场外交易代码：GTBIF）真的很沮丧，下跌了8.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> There was little news of any consequence from those companies. Rather, it seems that investors are reacting to one development in Washington that's encouraging on its surface. Following a similar move in the House of Representatives last week, Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, and his Republican counterpart Steve Daines of Montana have reintroduced the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司几乎没有任何后果的消息。相反，投资者似乎正在对华盛顿表面上令人鼓舞的事态发展做出反应。继上周众议院采取类似举措后，俄勒冈州民主党参议员杰夫·默克利和蒙大拿州共和党参议员史蒂夫·戴恩斯在参议院重新提出了《安全银行法》。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad0432cd677182be13f1af6415e6d71c\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1335\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> But Democrats, who tend to support marijuana reform measures, only control the Senate these days because of the potential tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Senate filibuster is still available to Republicans (who clearly intend to do their best to scotch Democrat initiatives). That means the SAFE Banking Act -- which would protect financial institutions in legalized states that want to offer basic banking services to marijuana businesses -- currently looks like a nonstarter there.</p><p><blockquote>但倾向于支持大麻改革措施的民主党人最近只控制了参议院，因为副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）可能会投出打破平局的票，共和党人仍然可以利用参议院的阻挠议事（他们显然打算尽最大努力阻止民主党的倡议）。这意味着《安全银行法》——该法案将保护希望向大麻企业提供基本银行服务的合法化州的金融机构——目前看起来在那里是行不通的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> So the one-step-forward-and-two-steps-back lurch of U.S. marijuana reform continues. But shareholders of Aprhia, Aurora, and their fellow cannabis stocks shouldn't be discouraged. Momentum still favors progress, as witnessed by the recent recreational-legalization switch thrown by Virginia. Believers in the future of corporate weed should stay the course.</p><p><blockquote>因此，美国大麻改革的前一步后退两步仍在继续。但Aprhia、Aurora及其大麻股票同行的股东不应气馁。势头仍然有利于进步，正如弗吉尼亚州最近抛出的娱乐合法化开关所见证的那样。相信企业大麻未来的人应该坚持到底。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/23/why-these-marijuana-stocks-tanked-on-tuesday/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"OGI":"ORGANIGRAM HOLD","APHA":"Aphria Inc.","ACB":"奥罗拉大麻公司","GTBIF":"Green Thumb Industries Inc.","CURLF":"Curaleaf Holdings, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/23/why-these-marijuana-stocks-tanked-on-tuesday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190328220","content_text":"A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly by investors.\nWhat happened\nTalk about a buzzkill: The latest news on marijuana reform didn't go over well with cannabis stock investors. On Tuesday, they sold off many sector favorites, including Aprhria(NASDAQ:APHA),Aurora Cannabis(NYSE:ACB),OrganiGram Holdings(NASDAQ:OGI),HEXO(NYSE:HEXO), and Curaleaf Holdings(OTC:CURLF). All fell at rates ranging from 3.4% to 4.5%. Meanwhile, multistate operator Green Thumb Industries(OTC:GTBIF) really took it on the chin, declining 8.4%.\nSo what\nThere was little news of any consequence from those companies. Rather, it seems that investors are reacting to one development in Washington that's encouraging on its surface. Following a similar move in the House of Representatives last week, Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, and his Republican counterpart Steve Daines of Montana have reintroduced the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nBut Democrats, who tend to support marijuana reform measures, only control the Senate these days because of the potential tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Senate filibuster is still available to Republicans (who clearly intend to do their best to scotch Democrat initiatives). That means the SAFE Banking Act -- which would protect financial institutions in legalized states that want to offer basic banking services to marijuana businesses -- currently looks like a nonstarter there.\nNow what\nSo the one-step-forward-and-two-steps-back lurch of U.S. marijuana reform continues. But shareholders of Aprhia, Aurora, and their fellow cannabis stocks shouldn't be discouraged. Momentum still favors progress, as witnessed by the recent recreational-legalization switch thrown by Virginia. Believers in the future of corporate weed should stay the course.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"OGI":0.9,"GTBIF":0.9,"ACB":0.9,"CURLF":0.9,"APHA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":351181908,"gmtCreate":1616575088704,"gmtModify":1634525131116,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351181908","repostId":"1190328220","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190328220","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616573860,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1190328220?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 16:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why These Marijuana Stocks Tanked on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么这些大麻股票周二暴跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190328220","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly","content":"<p>A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly by investors.</p><p><blockquote>该行业立法方面看似积极的进展并没有受到投资者的热烈欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> Talk about a buzzkill: The latest news on marijuana reform didn't go over well with cannabis stock investors. On Tuesday, they sold off many sector favorites, including <b>Aprhria</b>(NASDAQ:APHA),<b>Aurora Cannabis</b>(NYSE:ACB),<b>OrganiGram Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:OGI),<b>HEXO</b>(NYSE:HEXO), and <b>Curaleaf Holdings</b>(OTC:CURLF). All fell at rates ranging from 3.4% to 4.5%. Meanwhile, multistate operator <b>Green Thumb Industries</b>(OTC:GTBIF) really took it on the chin, declining 8.4%.</p><p><blockquote>谈论扫兴：大麻改革的最新消息并没有受到大麻股票投资者的欢迎。周二，他们抛售了许多行业热门股票，包括<b>阿普里亚</b>（纳斯达克：APHA），<b>奥罗拉大麻</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：ACB），<b>OrganiGram控股</b>（纳斯达克：OGI），<b>己糖</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：HEXO），以及<b>库拉利夫控股</b>（场外交易代码：CURLF）。跌幅均在3.4%至4.5%之间。同时，多状态算子<b>绿拇指工业</b>（场外交易代码：GTBIF）真的很沮丧，下跌了8.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> There was little news of any consequence from those companies. Rather, it seems that investors are reacting to one development in Washington that's encouraging on its surface. Following a similar move in the House of Representatives last week, Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, and his Republican counterpart Steve Daines of Montana have reintroduced the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司几乎没有任何后果的消息。相反，投资者似乎正在对华盛顿表面上令人鼓舞的事态发展做出反应。继上周众议院采取类似举措后，俄勒冈州民主党参议员杰夫·默克利和蒙大拿州共和党参议员史蒂夫·戴恩斯在参议院重新提出了《安全银行法》。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad0432cd677182be13f1af6415e6d71c\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1335\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> But Democrats, who tend to support marijuana reform measures, only control the Senate these days because of the potential tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Senate filibuster is still available to Republicans (who clearly intend to do their best to scotch Democrat initiatives). That means the SAFE Banking Act -- which would protect financial institutions in legalized states that want to offer basic banking services to marijuana businesses -- currently looks like a nonstarter there.</p><p><blockquote>但倾向于支持大麻改革措施的民主党人最近只控制了参议院，因为副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）可能会投出打破平局的票，共和党人仍然可以利用参议院的阻挠议事（他们显然打算尽最大努力阻止民主党的倡议）。这意味着《安全银行法》——该法案将保护希望向大麻企业提供基本银行服务的合法化州的金融机构——目前看起来在那里是行不通的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> So the one-step-forward-and-two-steps-back lurch of U.S. marijuana reform continues. But shareholders of Aprhia, Aurora, and their fellow cannabis stocks shouldn't be discouraged. Momentum still favors progress, as witnessed by the recent recreational-legalization switch thrown by Virginia. Believers in the future of corporate weed should stay the course.</p><p><blockquote>因此，美国大麻改革的前一步后退两步仍在继续。但Aprhia、Aurora及其大麻股票同行的股东不应气馁。势头仍然有利于进步，正如弗吉尼亚州最近抛出的娱乐合法化开关所见证的那样。相信企业大麻未来的人应该坚持到底。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why These Marijuana Stocks Tanked on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么这些大麻股票周二暴跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy These Marijuana Stocks Tanked on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么这些大麻股票周二暴跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-24 16:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly by investors.</p><p><blockquote>该行业立法方面看似积极的进展并没有受到投资者的热烈欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> Talk about a buzzkill: The latest news on marijuana reform didn't go over well with cannabis stock investors. On Tuesday, they sold off many sector favorites, including <b>Aprhria</b>(NASDAQ:APHA),<b>Aurora Cannabis</b>(NYSE:ACB),<b>OrganiGram Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:OGI),<b>HEXO</b>(NYSE:HEXO), and <b>Curaleaf Holdings</b>(OTC:CURLF). All fell at rates ranging from 3.4% to 4.5%. Meanwhile, multistate operator <b>Green Thumb Industries</b>(OTC:GTBIF) really took it on the chin, declining 8.4%.</p><p><blockquote>谈论扫兴：大麻改革的最新消息并没有受到大麻股票投资者的欢迎。周二，他们抛售了许多行业热门股票，包括<b>阿普里亚</b>（纳斯达克：APHA），<b>奥罗拉大麻</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：ACB），<b>OrganiGram控股</b>（纳斯达克：OGI），<b>己糖</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：HEXO），以及<b>库拉利夫控股</b>（场外交易代码：CURLF）。跌幅均在3.4%至4.5%之间。同时，多状态算子<b>绿拇指工业</b>（场外交易代码：GTBIF）真的很沮丧，下跌了8.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> There was little news of any consequence from those companies. Rather, it seems that investors are reacting to one development in Washington that's encouraging on its surface. Following a similar move in the House of Representatives last week, Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, and his Republican counterpart Steve Daines of Montana have reintroduced the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司几乎没有任何后果的消息。相反，投资者似乎正在对华盛顿表面上令人鼓舞的事态发展做出反应。继上周众议院采取类似举措后，俄勒冈州民主党参议员杰夫·默克利和蒙大拿州共和党参议员史蒂夫·戴恩斯在参议院重新提出了《安全银行法》。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad0432cd677182be13f1af6415e6d71c\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1335\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> But Democrats, who tend to support marijuana reform measures, only control the Senate these days because of the potential tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Senate filibuster is still available to Republicans (who clearly intend to do their best to scotch Democrat initiatives). That means the SAFE Banking Act -- which would protect financial institutions in legalized states that want to offer basic banking services to marijuana businesses -- currently looks like a nonstarter there.</p><p><blockquote>但倾向于支持大麻改革措施的民主党人最近只控制了参议院，因为副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）可能会投出打破平局的票，共和党人仍然可以利用参议院的阻挠议事（他们显然打算尽最大努力阻止民主党的倡议）。这意味着《安全银行法》——该法案将保护希望向大麻企业提供基本银行服务的合法化州的金融机构——目前看起来在那里是行不通的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> So the one-step-forward-and-two-steps-back lurch of U.S. marijuana reform continues. But shareholders of Aprhia, Aurora, and their fellow cannabis stocks shouldn't be discouraged. Momentum still favors progress, as witnessed by the recent recreational-legalization switch thrown by Virginia. Believers in the future of corporate weed should stay the course.</p><p><blockquote>因此，美国大麻改革的前一步后退两步仍在继续。但Aprhia、Aurora及其大麻股票同行的股东不应气馁。势头仍然有利于进步，正如弗吉尼亚州最近抛出的娱乐合法化开关所见证的那样。相信企业大麻未来的人应该坚持到底。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/23/why-these-marijuana-stocks-tanked-on-tuesday/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"OGI":"ORGANIGRAM HOLD","APHA":"Aphria Inc.","ACB":"奥罗拉大麻公司","GTBIF":"Green Thumb Industries Inc.","CURLF":"Curaleaf Holdings, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/23/why-these-marijuana-stocks-tanked-on-tuesday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190328220","content_text":"A seemingly positive development on the legislative front for the industry wasn't greeted too warmly by investors.\nWhat happened\nTalk about a buzzkill: The latest news on marijuana reform didn't go over well with cannabis stock investors. On Tuesday, they sold off many sector favorites, including Aprhria(NASDAQ:APHA),Aurora Cannabis(NYSE:ACB),OrganiGram Holdings(NASDAQ:OGI),HEXO(NYSE:HEXO), and Curaleaf Holdings(OTC:CURLF). All fell at rates ranging from 3.4% to 4.5%. Meanwhile, multistate operator Green Thumb Industries(OTC:GTBIF) really took it on the chin, declining 8.4%.\nSo what\nThere was little news of any consequence from those companies. Rather, it seems that investors are reacting to one development in Washington that's encouraging on its surface. Following a similar move in the House of Representatives last week, Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, and his Republican counterpart Steve Daines of Montana have reintroduced the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nBut Democrats, who tend to support marijuana reform measures, only control the Senate these days because of the potential tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Senate filibuster is still available to Republicans (who clearly intend to do their best to scotch Democrat initiatives). That means the SAFE Banking Act -- which would protect financial institutions in legalized states that want to offer basic banking services to marijuana businesses -- currently looks like a nonstarter there.\nNow what\nSo the one-step-forward-and-two-steps-back lurch of U.S. marijuana reform continues. But shareholders of Aprhia, Aurora, and their fellow cannabis stocks shouldn't be discouraged. Momentum still favors progress, as witnessed by the recent recreational-legalization switch thrown by Virginia. Believers in the future of corporate weed should stay the course.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"OGI":0.9,"GTBIF":0.9,"ACB":0.9,"CURLF":0.9,"APHA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125937102,"gmtCreate":1624640460506,"gmtModify":1633950141634,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125937102","repostId":"1134836867","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134836867","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624634837,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1134836867?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-25 23:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Kyle Bass Slams Fed, Sees Inflation Everywhere He Looks<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯猛烈抨击美联储，随处可见通胀</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134836867","media":"zerohedge","summary":"With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to th","content":"<p>With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to the latest inflation numbers,Hayman Capital's Kyle Bass returned to CNBCfor an interview with the \"Closing Bell\" crew on Thursday, where he offered a dramatically different vision of the present economic scenario vis-a-vis inflation.</p><p><blockquote>随着市场似乎对FOMC对最新通胀数据的反应不屑一顾，美国股市重回历史高位，海曼资本(Hayman Capital)的凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)周四回到CNBC接受“收盘钟声”工作人员的采访，他在采访中提出了截然不同的观点当前经济形势与通货膨胀的关系。</blockquote></p><p> Inan interview where heexpounded upon his claim that the US is already grappling with real inflation rates above 10%, the billionaire investor proclaimed that \"in every single aspect of life, I see inflation.\"</p><p><blockquote>在接受采访时，这位亿万富翁投资者阐述了他关于美国已经在努力应对超过10%的实际通胀率的说法，他宣称“在生活的各个方面，我都看到了通货膨胀。”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1d2089581ea201564daaba8b5aac961\" tg-width=\"521\" tg-height=\"310\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Why? Because during the past year and a half, the Fed has introduced more broad money into the American economy in the shortest time than we have seen at any point in American history.</p><p><blockquote>为什么？因为在过去一年半的时间里，美联储在最短的时间内向美国经济引入了比美国历史上任何时候都多的广义货币。</blockquote></p><p> \"I think look we're going to see a short-term turn-down in inflation because the initial inflationary burst was enormous...this transitory comment may play out to be true for a short period of time but I hink Sarah when you look at the the money supply the broad money in the US system from 1980 to 2010 it it vacillated between 50% and 60% of GDP and post the global financial crisis it moved up from roughly 60% to 68% 69% of GDP now that we're approaching 90 so in the one year period one and a half year period since COVID started we have introduced 34% more broad money in our system in the shortest time period in the history United States so we're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the fed continues to expand its balance sheet,\" Bass said. Even as the financial press prattles on about the significance of the Fed finally starting to consider tapering its asset purchases, Bass believes that the central bank won't be able to shrink its balance sheet so easily.</p><p><blockquote>“我认为我们将看到通胀短期下降，因为最初的通胀爆发是巨大的。..这种短暂的评论可能在短时间内是正确的，但我认为莎拉，当你看看1980年至2010年美国体系中的货币供应量时，它在GDP的50%至60%之间波动，在全球金融危机后，它占GDP的比例从大约60%上升到68%69%，现在我们已经接近90%，所以在新冠疫情爆发以来的一年半时间里，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内引入了34%的广义货币，所以如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移而走高。尽管金融媒体喋喋不休地谈论美联储最终开始考虑缩减资产购买规模的重要性，巴斯认为央行不会那么容易缩减资产负债表。</blockquote></p><p> \"We're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the Fed continues to expand its balance sheet which I think it will,\" Bass said. So, what can investors do to fight this \"inflation monster\", as Bass colorfully described it. Well, he suggested they focus on hard assets like commodities and real estate,which BlackRock is already buying up in droves.</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示：“如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移走高，我认为会这样做。”那么，投资者可以做些什么来对抗这个巴斯生动描述的“通胀怪物”呢？嗯，他建议他们关注大宗商品和房地产等硬资产，贝莱德已经在大量购买这些资产。</blockquote></p><p> Equities should \"do fine\", Bass said, citing data purporting to show that equity prices keep up with between 95% and 88% of inflation over the long term (though that certainly doesn't seem to fit the last decade).</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示，股市应该“表现良好”，他引用的数据似乎表明，从长远来看，股价能够跟上95%至88%的通胀率（尽管这似乎肯定不符合过去十年的情况）。</blockquote></p><p> As for his assessment of inflation and its dramatic difference with the Fed's view, Bass quipped: \"Your bank account is the final determinant whether there is inflation or not,\" he concluded, highlighting the higher prices consumers have seen for things like food and cars.\"</p><p><blockquote>至于他对通胀的评估及其与美联储观点的巨大差异，巴斯打趣道：“你的银行账户是是否存在通胀的最终决定因素，”他总结道，并强调了消费者看到的食品和汽车等商品的价格上涨。”</blockquote></p><p> \"If you're in the market place you want to own commodities if you’re in the real world you want to own productive real estate you even want to buy rural land in front of major demographic moves in the US...I’d rather own hard assets than equities today because I think we’re only seeing just the beginning of population moves in the US.\" </p><p><blockquote>“如果你在市场上，你想拥有大宗商品，如果你在现实世界中，你想拥有生产性房地产，你甚至想在美国人口发生重大变化之前购买农村土地……我宁愿今天拥有硬资产而不是股票，因为我认为我们只看到美国人口流动的开始。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Kyle Bass Slams Fed, Sees Inflation Everywhere He Looks<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯猛烈抨击美联储，随处可见通胀</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nKyle Bass Slams Fed, Sees Inflation Everywhere He Looks<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯猛烈抨击美联储，随处可见通胀</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-25 23:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to the latest inflation numbers,Hayman Capital's Kyle Bass returned to CNBCfor an interview with the \"Closing Bell\" crew on Thursday, where he offered a dramatically different vision of the present economic scenario vis-a-vis inflation.</p><p><blockquote>随着市场似乎对FOMC对最新通胀数据的反应不屑一顾，美国股市重回历史高位，海曼资本(Hayman Capital)的凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)周四回到CNBC接受“收盘钟声”工作人员的采访，他在采访中提出了截然不同的观点当前经济形势与通货膨胀的关系。</blockquote></p><p> Inan interview where heexpounded upon his claim that the US is already grappling with real inflation rates above 10%, the billionaire investor proclaimed that \"in every single aspect of life, I see inflation.\"</p><p><blockquote>在接受采访时，这位亿万富翁投资者阐述了他关于美国已经在努力应对超过10%的实际通胀率的说法，他宣称“在生活的各个方面，我都看到了通货膨胀。”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1d2089581ea201564daaba8b5aac961\" tg-width=\"521\" tg-height=\"310\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Why? Because during the past year and a half, the Fed has introduced more broad money into the American economy in the shortest time than we have seen at any point in American history.</p><p><blockquote>为什么？因为在过去一年半的时间里，美联储在最短的时间内向美国经济引入了比美国历史上任何时候都多的广义货币。</blockquote></p><p> \"I think look we're going to see a short-term turn-down in inflation because the initial inflationary burst was enormous...this transitory comment may play out to be true for a short period of time but I hink Sarah when you look at the the money supply the broad money in the US system from 1980 to 2010 it it vacillated between 50% and 60% of GDP and post the global financial crisis it moved up from roughly 60% to 68% 69% of GDP now that we're approaching 90 so in the one year period one and a half year period since COVID started we have introduced 34% more broad money in our system in the shortest time period in the history United States so we're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the fed continues to expand its balance sheet,\" Bass said. Even as the financial press prattles on about the significance of the Fed finally starting to consider tapering its asset purchases, Bass believes that the central bank won't be able to shrink its balance sheet so easily.</p><p><blockquote>“我认为我们将看到通胀短期下降，因为最初的通胀爆发是巨大的。..这种短暂的评论可能在短时间内是正确的，但我认为莎拉，当你看看1980年至2010年美国体系中的货币供应量时，它在GDP的50%至60%之间波动，在全球金融危机后，它占GDP的比例从大约60%上升到68%69%，现在我们已经接近90%，所以在新冠疫情爆发以来的一年半时间里，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内，我们在美国历史上最短的时间内引入了34%的广义货币，所以如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移而走高。尽管金融媒体喋喋不休地谈论美联储最终开始考虑缩减资产购买规模的重要性，巴斯认为央行不会那么容易缩减资产负债表。</blockquote></p><p> \"We're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the Fed continues to expand its balance sheet which I think it will,\" Bass said. So, what can investors do to fight this \"inflation monster\", as Bass colorfully described it. Well, he suggested they focus on hard assets like commodities and real estate,which BlackRock is already buying up in droves.</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示：“如果美联储继续扩大资产负债表，我们将看到价格保持高位，并随着时间的推移走高，我认为会这样做。”那么，投资者可以做些什么来对抗这个巴斯生动描述的“通胀怪物”呢？嗯，他建议他们关注大宗商品和房地产等硬资产，贝莱德已经在大量购买这些资产。</blockquote></p><p> Equities should \"do fine\", Bass said, citing data purporting to show that equity prices keep up with between 95% and 88% of inflation over the long term (though that certainly doesn't seem to fit the last decade).</p><p><blockquote>巴斯表示，股市应该“表现良好”，他引用的数据似乎表明，从长远来看，股价能够跟上95%至88%的通胀率（尽管这似乎肯定不符合过去十年的情况）。</blockquote></p><p> As for his assessment of inflation and its dramatic difference with the Fed's view, Bass quipped: \"Your bank account is the final determinant whether there is inflation or not,\" he concluded, highlighting the higher prices consumers have seen for things like food and cars.\"</p><p><blockquote>至于他对通胀的评估及其与美联储观点的巨大差异，巴斯打趣道：“你的银行账户是是否存在通胀的最终决定因素，”他总结道，并强调了消费者看到的食品和汽车等商品的价格上涨。”</blockquote></p><p> \"If you're in the market place you want to own commodities if you’re in the real world you want to own productive real estate you even want to buy rural land in front of major demographic moves in the US...I’d rather own hard assets than equities today because I think we’re only seeing just the beginning of population moves in the US.\" </p><p><blockquote>“如果你在市场上，你想拥有大宗商品，如果你在现实世界中，你想拥有生产性房地产，你甚至想在美国人口发生重大变化之前购买农村土地……我宁愿今天拥有硬资产而不是股票，因为我认为我们只看到美国人口流动的开始。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/kyle-bass-warns-every-aspect-my-life-i-see-inflation?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/kyle-bass-warns-every-aspect-my-life-i-see-inflation?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134836867","content_text":"With US stocks back at all-time highs as the market seemingly shrugged off the FOMC's reaction to the latest inflation numbers,Hayman Capital's Kyle Bass returned to CNBCfor an interview with the \"Closing Bell\" crew on Thursday, where he offered a dramatically different vision of the present economic scenario vis-a-vis inflation.\nInan interview where heexpounded upon his claim that the US is already grappling with real inflation rates above 10%, the billionaire investor proclaimed that \"in every single aspect of life, I see inflation.\"\n\nWhy? Because during the past year and a half, the Fed has introduced more broad money into the American economy in the shortest time than we have seen at any point in American history.\n\n \"I think look we're going to see a short-term turn-down in inflation because the initial inflationary burst was enormous...this transitory comment may play out to be true for a short period of time but I hink Sarah when you look at the the money supply the broad money in the US system from 1980 to 2010 it it vacillated between 50% and 60% of GDP and post the global financial crisis it moved up from roughly 60% to 68% 69% of GDP now that we're approaching 90 so in the one year period one and a half year period since COVID started we have introduced 34% more broad money in our system in the shortest time period in the history United States so we're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the fed continues to expand its balance sheet,\" Bass said.\n\nEven as the financial press prattles on about the significance of the Fed finally starting to consider tapering its asset purchases, Bass believes that the central bank won't be able to shrink its balance sheet so easily.\n\n \"We're going to see prices stay high and move higher over time if the Fed continues to expand its balance sheet which I think it will,\" Bass said.\n\nSo, what can investors do to fight this \"inflation monster\", as Bass colorfully described it. Well, he suggested they focus on hard assets like commodities and real estate,which BlackRock is already buying up in droves.\nEquities should \"do fine\", Bass said, citing data purporting to show that equity prices keep up with between 95% and 88% of inflation over the long term (though that certainly doesn't seem to fit the last decade).\nAs for his assessment of inflation and its dramatic difference with the Fed's view, Bass quipped: \"Your bank account is the final determinant whether there is inflation or not,\" he concluded, highlighting the higher prices consumers have seen for things like food and cars.\"\n\n \"If you're in the market place you want to own commodities if you’re in the real world you want to own productive real estate you even want to buy rural land in front of major demographic moves in the US...I’d rather own hard assets than equities today because I think we’re only seeing just the beginning of population moves in the US.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":894,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125935089,"gmtCreate":1624640352341,"gmtModify":1633950142675,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Too corrupted ","listText":"Too corrupted ","text":"Too corrupted","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125935089","repostId":"1198438276","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1006,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125932283,"gmtCreate":1624640323642,"gmtModify":1633950143041,"author":{"id":"3577086012713886","authorId":"3577086012713886","name":"DavidDarren","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd4dc981c88f5814c2fa7d5ac80d0f48","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577086012713886","idStr":"3577086012713886"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yayyy","listText":"Yayyy","text":"Yayyy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125932283","repostId":"2146072291","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":705,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
