LIAN230221的个人主页 - 老虎社区

LIAN230221

LIAN230221

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

641关注

16粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-08-12

Please like this and comment thanks

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-10

Please like this and comment thanks

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-21

Please like this and comment thanks

Netflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth<blockquote>Netflix预测增长疲软，详细介绍了视频游戏推广</blockquote>

2021-07-09

Please like this thanks

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-18

Like this

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-06

Please like and comment. Thanks

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-02

Like this please

Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>

2021-05-20

Like this please [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]

U.S. stocks drop after Fed minutes, crypto fall<blockquote>美联储会议纪要后美国股市下跌，加密货币下跌</blockquote>

2021-07-01

Please like this and comment. Thanks

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-13

Like this

Inflation Will Kill This Stock Market<blockquote>通货膨胀会扼杀这个股市</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577137894024224","uuid":"3577137894024224","gmtCreate":1614044044309,"gmtModify":1621994400784,"name":"LIAN230221","pinyin":"lian230221","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":16,"headSize":641,"tweetSize":153,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.12.27","exceedPercentage":"80.13%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.08","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"60.23%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":690739901,"gmtCreate":1639707146800,"gmtModify":1639708352715,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690739901","repostId":"1157750048","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1157750048","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639698910,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1157750048?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 07:55","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"昨夜今晨：大型科技股全线下挫！苹果欲开发自研无线芯片","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1157750048","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"摘要：①科技股拖累美股收跌，纳指大跌近2.5%；②热门中概股收盘涨跌不一，开心汽车涨超36%；③贝壳股价周四收盘跌近2% 此前遭浑水公司做空；④英国央行在疫情危机爆发以来首次加息，以对抗通胀飙升。\n\n","content":"<blockquote>\n 摘要：①科技股拖累美股收跌，纳指大跌近2.5%；②热门中概股收盘涨跌不一，开心汽车涨超36%；③贝壳股价周四收盘跌近2% 此前遭浑水公司做空；④英国央行在疫情危机爆发以来首次加息，以对抗通胀飙升。\n</blockquote>\n<p>海外市场</p>\n<p>1、科技股拖累美股收跌纳指大跌近2.5%、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>下挫3.9%</p>\n<p>周四(12月16日)，美国股市下滑，大型科技股的疲软拖累了主要股指的表现。以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌2.47%，创下9月以来的最大单日跌幅。标准普尔500指数下跌0.87%，道琼斯工业指数跌0.08%。</p>\n<p>周四的交易中，一些大型科技股走势艰难，苹果下跌3.9%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">英伟达</a>等主要半导体股分别下跌近5.4%和6.8%。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a>公司的前瞻指导低于分析师预期，该公司股价下跌超过10%。</p>\n<p>2、热门中概股周四收盘涨跌不一 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KXIN\">开心汽车</a>涨超36% <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BEKE\">贝壳</a>跌近2%</p>\n<p>热门中概股周四收盘涨跌不一，开心汽车涨超36%，此前该公司获超5亿美元新能源卡车订单；贝壳跌近2%，该公司此前遭知名做空机构浑水公司做空。</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTT\">趣头条</a>涨超9%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UCL\">优克联</a>涨超8%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STG\">尚德机构</a>涨超6%，人人公司、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WDH\">水滴</a>公司、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMCM\">猎豹移动</a>涨超5%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LIZI\">荔枝</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VNET\">世纪互联</a>涨超4%；<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BQ\">波奇宠物</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBON\">亿邦国际</a>跌超8%，携程跌超7%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UXIN\">优信</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JG\">极光</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DDL\">叮咚</a>买菜跌超6%。</p>\n<p>3、石油及天然气行业领涨欧股 德国DAX30指数涨1%</p>\n<p>欧洲股市周四（12月16日）跳涨，受欧洲及英国央行的货币政策决定支持。泛欧斯托克600指数周四收盘上涨1.23%，石油和天然气股领涨涨幅2.8%，所有行业和主要股市都在积极区域交易。泛欧斯托克600指数上涨5.80点，涨幅1.23%，报476.56点；德国DAX30指数收盘上涨154.78点，涨幅1.00%，报15631.13点；</p>\n<p>4、美国库存下降 美元走软 双重利好支持油价上涨</p>\n<p>周四(12月16日)，在美国公布自9月以来最大的原油库存下降而美元下滑后，油价连续第二天上涨。截至发稿，美国WTI原油期货上涨117美分，涨幅1.65%，报72.04美元/桶；布伦特期货上涨93美分，涨幅1.26%，报74.81美元/桶。</p>\n<p>5、贵金属集体大爆发！黄金狂飙逾20美元</p>\n<p>周四(12月16日)，金价上涨逾1%，因美元走软，此前美联储决定加快退出在大流行时期推出的刺激措施，符合市场普遍预期。</p>\n<p>美市尾盘，现货黄金收报1798.87美元/盎司，上涨22.60美元或1.27%，日内最高触及1799.57美元高点，最低触及1775.43美元。</p>\n<p>国际宏观</p>\n<p>1、拜登签署提高美国政府债务上限法案</p>\n<p>CNBC报道，美国总统拜登于当地时间12月16日签署了将债务上限提高2.5万亿美元的法案，使美国财政部的借款授权延长至2023年，暂时避免政府债务违约。</p>\n<p>为避免出现债务违约，美国财政部长耶伦近期敦促国会在12月15日之前再次调高债务上限，但共和党不愿配合行动。经过协商，参议院民主党领袖舒默和共和党领袖麦康奈尔上周达成协议，允许参议院绕过多数立法批准所需的60票门槛、以简单多数通过相关决议案，从而使在参议院拥有50席的民主党可以不依靠共和党支持独自提高债务上限。</p>\n<p>2、福奇：奥密克戎将在几周内成为美国主要流行毒株</p>\n<p>美国国家过敏症和传染病研究所所长安东尼-福奇周四表示，奥密克戎将在几周内成为美国的主要流行新冠毒株，并敦促民众接种新冠疫苗和加强针。</p>\n<p>“这是我们面临的最具传染性的新冠毒株，它很快就会在这里占据主导地位。”福奇称。</p>\n<p>3、拜登2万亿美元经济支出计划据悉因党内分歧推迟到2022年表决</p>\n<p>参议院民主党人放弃了在今年通过总统拜登2万亿美元经济议程的打算，使白宫遭受政治打击。延期消息得到了两位知情人士证实。如此一来民主党内围绕支出法案的分歧可能会加剧，许多民主党人将该法案视为2022年中期选举的关键。</p>\n<p>4、欧洲央行维持三大利率不变 拉加德重申明年不太可能加息</p>\n<p>当地时间周四(12月16日)，欧洲央行在德国法兰克福举行的管委会会议上决定，维持三大关键利率不变，符合市场预期。同时决定在明年一季度放缓为应对疫情而采取的“紧急购债计划(PEPP)”，该计划也将按原定时间在明年三月底终止。</p>\n<p>5、英国央行在疫情危机爆发以来首次加息 以对抗通胀飙升</p>\n<p>在英国央行之前，美联储已经转向了更鹰派的立场大多数经济学家之前预计英国央行维持利率不变。英国央行自新冠疫情爆发以来首次加息。尽管创纪录的新冠感染病例给经济带来威胁，但该国依然在全球率先行动以对抗通胀飙升。</p>\n<p>6、美联储隔夜逆回购连续第二天创下历史新高</p>\n<p>周四，美联储隔夜逆回购协议的使用量增加365亿美元，达到1.658万亿美元。这超过了周三创下的历史纪录1.621万亿美元。周四有78家对手方利用了这一工具。</p>\n<p>随着机构对存放短期现金的需求增加，今年美联储逆回购工具的使用规模飙升。政府现金余额下降以及对突破债务上限的担忧也起到了推波助澜的作用。</p>\n<p>公司新闻</p>\n<p>1、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192944121\" target=\"_blank\">贝壳股价周四收盘跌近2% 此前遭浑水公司做空</a></p>\n<p>贝壳股价周四收盘下跌1.98%，报18.31美元，该公司此前遭知名做空机构浑水公司（Muddy Waters Research）做空。在浑水公司造假指控下，贝壳股价周四经历了“过山车”行情。贝壳股价在浑水做空报告发布后，盘前跌一度大跌10%，随后该公司的回应令股价拉升，盘中一度大涨14%，但临近午盘再度回落，此后维持低位震荡。</p>\n<p>2、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2191945453\" target=\"_blank\">携程Q3财报：前三季度总营收恢复至疫情前56%，国际业务成突破口</a></p>\n<p>12月16日，携程集团发布了截至2021年9月30日第三季度未经审计的财务业绩。财报显示，今年第三季度，携程实现营收53亿元，经调整EBITDA为5.37亿元，经调整EBITDA利润率为10%。同时，归属于携程股东的净亏损为8.49亿元（约合1.31亿美元），上年同期录得净利润16亿元。</p>\n<p>3、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192894268\" target=\"_blank\">美国疾控中心专家表示辉瑞和Moderna的疫苗优于强生</a></p>\n<p>美国公共卫生顾问表示，Moderna和辉瑞的mRNA疫苗比强生疫苗更适合成年人使用。美国疾控中心免疫实践咨询委员会周四开会，15名成员一致投票同意关于强生疫苗的建议。此前，美国监管机构修改关于强生疫苗的情况说明，就该疫苗可能引发罕见的血栓综合症发出警告。</p>\n<p>4、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192094908\" target=\"_blank\">报道称苹果为南加州办事处招聘工程师 以开发自研无线芯片</a></p>\n<p>据报道，苹果公司正在为南加州的一个办事处招聘工程师，以开发自研无线芯片，并最终取代<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRCM\">博通</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SWKS\">思佳讯</a>制造的芯片。</p>\n<p>报道称，苹果公司正在寻找“数十名”人员在尔湾开发芯片，该地区靠近<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AVGO\">博通</a>、思佳讯和其他芯片制造商的所在地。</p>\n<h4>5、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192947198\" target=\"_blank\">Rivian Q3财报：净亏损扩大至12.3亿美元 官宣50亿美元建新厂</a></h4>\n<p>美股周四盘后，刚刚在11月IPO狂揽137亿美元融资的电动车概念股Rivian发布上市后首份财报，首次取得营收和亏损扩大也在市场的意料之中。</p>\n<p>根据财报披露，公司今年三季度总共实现营收100万美元，营运损失7.76亿美元，净亏损12.33亿美元，去年同期亏损2.88亿美元。</p>\n<p>6、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192414459\" target=\"_blank\">成长股逆风不止 Adobe疲软前瞻指引导致股价大跌逾10%</a></p>\n<p>当地时间周四，美股软件巨头Adobe发布截至12月3日的2021财年四季报，虽然财报本身创出营收新高，但逊于预期的前瞻指引再度引发了投资者抛售，截至发稿公司股价跌10.81%。</p>\n<p>7、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192085949\" target=\"_blank\">瑞幸咖啡4.6亿美元债务重组获得美国法院批准</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LK\">瑞幸咖啡</a>的债务重组计划获得美国曼哈顿一名联邦法官的同意，意味着这项在开曼群岛法院制定的安排可以在美国实施。根据法院文件，4.6亿美元票据的持有人将获得3.2亿美元现金加新债券。该计划还了结了股东在瑞幸咖啡被指虚报销售额后发起的很多诉讼。该公司高层还在继续应对部分股东诉讼。瑞幸咖啡美股粉单市场目前跌2.2%。</p>\n<p>8、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2191943669\" target=\"_blank\">达美航空预计2022年会盈利，2024年营收有望超500亿美元</a></p>\n<p>达美航空(DAL.US)表示，该公司预计将在2022年实现有意义的盈利，并在2024年超越疫情前盈利水平。</p>\n<p>达美航空在其资本市场日活动上介绍了其战略重点，财务方面的首要任务是恢复其财务基础，重点关注效率和现金产生，到2024年实现投资级别指标。</p>\n<p>9、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192894799\" target=\"_blank\">卡骆驰：一双橡胶鞋撑起了股价五年飙升近2000%</a></p>\n<p>今年迄今为止，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CROX\">卡骆驰</a>股价已飙升近130%，5年涨幅超过1,900%，主导了标普400非必需消费品板块在此期间85%的涨幅。相比之下，以看似火箭式的涨幅和直言不讳的CEO而闻名的<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>股价在这段时间飙升了约2100%。</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>昨夜今晨：大型科技股全线下挫！苹果欲开发自研无线芯片</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n昨夜今晨：大型科技股全线下挫！苹果欲开发自研无线芯片\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-17 07:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n 摘要：①科技股拖累美股收跌，纳指大跌近2.5%；②热门中概股收盘涨跌不一，开心汽车涨超36%；③贝壳股价周四收盘跌近2% 此前遭浑水公司做空；④英国央行在疫情危机爆发以来首次加息，以对抗通胀飙升。\n</blockquote>\n<p>海外市场</p>\n<p>1、科技股拖累美股收跌纳指大跌近2.5%、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>下挫3.9%</p>\n<p>周四(12月16日)，美国股市下滑，大型科技股的疲软拖累了主要股指的表现。以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌2.47%，创下9月以来的最大单日跌幅。标准普尔500指数下跌0.87%，道琼斯工业指数跌0.08%。</p>\n<p>周四的交易中，一些大型科技股走势艰难，苹果下跌3.9%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">英伟达</a>等主要半导体股分别下跌近5.4%和6.8%。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a>公司的前瞻指导低于分析师预期，该公司股价下跌超过10%。</p>\n<p>2、热门中概股周四收盘涨跌不一 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KXIN\">开心汽车</a>涨超36% <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BEKE\">贝壳</a>跌近2%</p>\n<p>热门中概股周四收盘涨跌不一，开心汽车涨超36%，此前该公司获超5亿美元新能源卡车订单；贝壳跌近2%，该公司此前遭知名做空机构浑水公司做空。</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTT\">趣头条</a>涨超9%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UCL\">优克联</a>涨超8%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STG\">尚德机构</a>涨超6%，人人公司、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WDH\">水滴</a>公司、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMCM\">猎豹移动</a>涨超5%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LIZI\">荔枝</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VNET\">世纪互联</a>涨超4%；<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BQ\">波奇宠物</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBON\">亿邦国际</a>跌超8%，携程跌超7%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UXIN\">优信</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JG\">极光</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DDL\">叮咚</a>买菜跌超6%。</p>\n<p>3、石油及天然气行业领涨欧股 德国DAX30指数涨1%</p>\n<p>欧洲股市周四（12月16日）跳涨，受欧洲及英国央行的货币政策决定支持。泛欧斯托克600指数周四收盘上涨1.23%，石油和天然气股领涨涨幅2.8%，所有行业和主要股市都在积极区域交易。泛欧斯托克600指数上涨5.80点，涨幅1.23%，报476.56点；德国DAX30指数收盘上涨154.78点，涨幅1.00%，报15631.13点；</p>\n<p>4、美国库存下降 美元走软 双重利好支持油价上涨</p>\n<p>周四(12月16日)，在美国公布自9月以来最大的原油库存下降而美元下滑后，油价连续第二天上涨。截至发稿，美国WTI原油期货上涨117美分，涨幅1.65%，报72.04美元/桶；布伦特期货上涨93美分，涨幅1.26%，报74.81美元/桶。</p>\n<p>5、贵金属集体大爆发！黄金狂飙逾20美元</p>\n<p>周四(12月16日)，金价上涨逾1%，因美元走软，此前美联储决定加快退出在大流行时期推出的刺激措施，符合市场普遍预期。</p>\n<p>美市尾盘，现货黄金收报1798.87美元/盎司，上涨22.60美元或1.27%，日内最高触及1799.57美元高点，最低触及1775.43美元。</p>\n<p>国际宏观</p>\n<p>1、拜登签署提高美国政府债务上限法案</p>\n<p>CNBC报道，美国总统拜登于当地时间12月16日签署了将债务上限提高2.5万亿美元的法案，使美国财政部的借款授权延长至2023年，暂时避免政府债务违约。</p>\n<p>为避免出现债务违约，美国财政部长耶伦近期敦促国会在12月15日之前再次调高债务上限，但共和党不愿配合行动。经过协商，参议院民主党领袖舒默和共和党领袖麦康奈尔上周达成协议，允许参议院绕过多数立法批准所需的60票门槛、以简单多数通过相关决议案，从而使在参议院拥有50席的民主党可以不依靠共和党支持独自提高债务上限。</p>\n<p>2、福奇：奥密克戎将在几周内成为美国主要流行毒株</p>\n<p>美国国家过敏症和传染病研究所所长安东尼-福奇周四表示，奥密克戎将在几周内成为美国的主要流行新冠毒株，并敦促民众接种新冠疫苗和加强针。</p>\n<p>“这是我们面临的最具传染性的新冠毒株，它很快就会在这里占据主导地位。”福奇称。</p>\n<p>3、拜登2万亿美元经济支出计划据悉因党内分歧推迟到2022年表决</p>\n<p>参议院民主党人放弃了在今年通过总统拜登2万亿美元经济议程的打算，使白宫遭受政治打击。延期消息得到了两位知情人士证实。如此一来民主党内围绕支出法案的分歧可能会加剧，许多民主党人将该法案视为2022年中期选举的关键。</p>\n<p>4、欧洲央行维持三大利率不变 拉加德重申明年不太可能加息</p>\n<p>当地时间周四(12月16日)，欧洲央行在德国法兰克福举行的管委会会议上决定，维持三大关键利率不变，符合市场预期。同时决定在明年一季度放缓为应对疫情而采取的“紧急购债计划(PEPP)”，该计划也将按原定时间在明年三月底终止。</p>\n<p>5、英国央行在疫情危机爆发以来首次加息 以对抗通胀飙升</p>\n<p>在英国央行之前，美联储已经转向了更鹰派的立场大多数经济学家之前预计英国央行维持利率不变。英国央行自新冠疫情爆发以来首次加息。尽管创纪录的新冠感染病例给经济带来威胁，但该国依然在全球率先行动以对抗通胀飙升。</p>\n<p>6、美联储隔夜逆回购连续第二天创下历史新高</p>\n<p>周四，美联储隔夜逆回购协议的使用量增加365亿美元，达到1.658万亿美元。这超过了周三创下的历史纪录1.621万亿美元。周四有78家对手方利用了这一工具。</p>\n<p>随着机构对存放短期现金的需求增加，今年美联储逆回购工具的使用规模飙升。政府现金余额下降以及对突破债务上限的担忧也起到了推波助澜的作用。</p>\n<p>公司新闻</p>\n<p>1、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192944121\" target=\"_blank\">贝壳股价周四收盘跌近2% 此前遭浑水公司做空</a></p>\n<p>贝壳股价周四收盘下跌1.98%，报18.31美元，该公司此前遭知名做空机构浑水公司（Muddy Waters Research）做空。在浑水公司造假指控下，贝壳股价周四经历了“过山车”行情。贝壳股价在浑水做空报告发布后，盘前跌一度大跌10%，随后该公司的回应令股价拉升，盘中一度大涨14%，但临近午盘再度回落，此后维持低位震荡。</p>\n<p>2、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2191945453\" target=\"_blank\">携程Q3财报：前三季度总营收恢复至疫情前56%，国际业务成突破口</a></p>\n<p>12月16日，携程集团发布了截至2021年9月30日第三季度未经审计的财务业绩。财报显示，今年第三季度，携程实现营收53亿元，经调整EBITDA为5.37亿元，经调整EBITDA利润率为10%。同时，归属于携程股东的净亏损为8.49亿元（约合1.31亿美元），上年同期录得净利润16亿元。</p>\n<p>3、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192894268\" target=\"_blank\">美国疾控中心专家表示辉瑞和Moderna的疫苗优于强生</a></p>\n<p>美国公共卫生顾问表示，Moderna和辉瑞的mRNA疫苗比强生疫苗更适合成年人使用。美国疾控中心免疫实践咨询委员会周四开会，15名成员一致投票同意关于强生疫苗的建议。此前，美国监管机构修改关于强生疫苗的情况说明，就该疫苗可能引发罕见的血栓综合症发出警告。</p>\n<p>4、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192094908\" target=\"_blank\">报道称苹果为南加州办事处招聘工程师 以开发自研无线芯片</a></p>\n<p>据报道，苹果公司正在为南加州的一个办事处招聘工程师，以开发自研无线芯片，并最终取代<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRCM\">博通</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SWKS\">思佳讯</a>制造的芯片。</p>\n<p>报道称，苹果公司正在寻找“数十名”人员在尔湾开发芯片，该地区靠近<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AVGO\">博通</a>、思佳讯和其他芯片制造商的所在地。</p>\n<h4>5、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192947198\" target=\"_blank\">Rivian Q3财报：净亏损扩大至12.3亿美元 官宣50亿美元建新厂</a></h4>\n<p>美股周四盘后，刚刚在11月IPO狂揽137亿美元融资的电动车概念股Rivian发布上市后首份财报，首次取得营收和亏损扩大也在市场的意料之中。</p>\n<p>根据财报披露，公司今年三季度总共实现营收100万美元，营运损失7.76亿美元，净亏损12.33亿美元，去年同期亏损2.88亿美元。</p>\n<p>6、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192414459\" target=\"_blank\">成长股逆风不止 Adobe疲软前瞻指引导致股价大跌逾10%</a></p>\n<p>当地时间周四，美股软件巨头Adobe发布截至12月3日的2021财年四季报，虽然财报本身创出营收新高，但逊于预期的前瞻指引再度引发了投资者抛售，截至发稿公司股价跌10.81%。</p>\n<p>7、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192085949\" target=\"_blank\">瑞幸咖啡4.6亿美元债务重组获得美国法院批准</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LK\">瑞幸咖啡</a>的债务重组计划获得美国曼哈顿一名联邦法官的同意，意味着这项在开曼群岛法院制定的安排可以在美国实施。根据法院文件，4.6亿美元票据的持有人将获得3.2亿美元现金加新债券。该计划还了结了股东在瑞幸咖啡被指虚报销售额后发起的很多诉讼。该公司高层还在继续应对部分股东诉讼。瑞幸咖啡美股粉单市场目前跌2.2%。</p>\n<p>8、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2191943669\" target=\"_blank\">达美航空预计2022年会盈利，2024年营收有望超500亿美元</a></p>\n<p>达美航空(DAL.US)表示，该公司预计将在2022年实现有意义的盈利，并在2024年超越疫情前盈利水平。</p>\n<p>达美航空在其资本市场日活动上介绍了其战略重点，财务方面的首要任务是恢复其财务基础，重点关注效率和现金产生，到2024年实现投资级别指标。</p>\n<p>9、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2192894799\" target=\"_blank\">卡骆驰：一双橡胶鞋撑起了股价五年飙升近2000%</a></p>\n<p>今年迄今为止，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CROX\">卡骆驰</a>股价已飙升近130%，5年涨幅超过1,900%，主导了标普400非必需消费品板块在此期间85%的涨幅。相比之下，以看似火箭式的涨幅和直言不讳的CEO而闻名的<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>股价在这段时间飙升了约2100%。</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b23574aac95526c9e5c62ebc8dd25130","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","AAPL":"苹果","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","03086":"华夏纳指","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4501":"段永平概念","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","TTTN":"老虎中美互联网巨头ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4566":"资本集团",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1157750048","content_text":"摘要：①科技股拖累美股收跌，纳指大跌近2.5%；②热门中概股收盘涨跌不一，开心汽车涨超36%；③贝壳股价周四收盘跌近2% 此前遭浑水公司做空；④英国央行在疫情危机爆发以来首次加息，以对抗通胀飙升。\n\n海外市场\n1、科技股拖累美股收跌纳指大跌近2.5%、苹果下挫3.9%\n周四(12月16日)，美国股市下滑，大型科技股的疲软拖累了主要股指的表现。以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌2.47%，创下9月以来的最大单日跌幅。标准普尔500指数下跌0.87%，道琼斯工业指数跌0.08%。\n周四的交易中，一些大型科技股走势艰难，苹果下跌3.9%，AMD和英伟达等主要半导体股分别下跌近5.4%和6.8%。Adobe公司的前瞻指导低于分析师预期，该公司股价下跌超过10%。\n2、热门中概股周四收盘涨跌不一 开心汽车涨超36% 贝壳跌近2%\n热门中概股周四收盘涨跌不一，开心汽车涨超36%，此前该公司获超5亿美元新能源卡车订单；贝壳跌近2%，该公司此前遭知名做空机构浑水公司做空。\n趣头条涨超9%，优克联涨超8%，尚德机构涨超6%，人人公司、水滴公司、猎豹移动涨超5%，荔枝、世纪互联涨超4%；波奇宠物、亿邦国际跌超8%，携程跌超7%，优信、极光、叮咚买菜跌超6%。\n3、石油及天然气行业领涨欧股 德国DAX30指数涨1%\n欧洲股市周四（12月16日）跳涨，受欧洲及英国央行的货币政策决定支持。泛欧斯托克600指数周四收盘上涨1.23%，石油和天然气股领涨涨幅2.8%，所有行业和主要股市都在积极区域交易。泛欧斯托克600指数上涨5.80点，涨幅1.23%，报476.56点；德国DAX30指数收盘上涨154.78点，涨幅1.00%，报15631.13点；\n4、美国库存下降 美元走软 双重利好支持油价上涨\n周四(12月16日)，在美国公布自9月以来最大的原油库存下降而美元下滑后，油价连续第二天上涨。截至发稿，美国WTI原油期货上涨117美分，涨幅1.65%，报72.04美元/桶；布伦特期货上涨93美分，涨幅1.26%，报74.81美元/桶。\n5、贵金属集体大爆发！黄金狂飙逾20美元\n周四(12月16日)，金价上涨逾1%，因美元走软，此前美联储决定加快退出在大流行时期推出的刺激措施，符合市场普遍预期。\n美市尾盘，现货黄金收报1798.87美元/盎司，上涨22.60美元或1.27%，日内最高触及1799.57美元高点，最低触及1775.43美元。\n国际宏观\n1、拜登签署提高美国政府债务上限法案\nCNBC报道，美国总统拜登于当地时间12月16日签署了将债务上限提高2.5万亿美元的法案，使美国财政部的借款授权延长至2023年，暂时避免政府债务违约。\n为避免出现债务违约，美国财政部长耶伦近期敦促国会在12月15日之前再次调高债务上限，但共和党不愿配合行动。经过协商，参议院民主党领袖舒默和共和党领袖麦康奈尔上周达成协议，允许参议院绕过多数立法批准所需的60票门槛、以简单多数通过相关决议案，从而使在参议院拥有50席的民主党可以不依靠共和党支持独自提高债务上限。\n2、福奇：奥密克戎将在几周内成为美国主要流行毒株\n美国国家过敏症和传染病研究所所长安东尼-福奇周四表示，奥密克戎将在几周内成为美国的主要流行新冠毒株，并敦促民众接种新冠疫苗和加强针。\n“这是我们面临的最具传染性的新冠毒株，它很快就会在这里占据主导地位。”福奇称。\n3、拜登2万亿美元经济支出计划据悉因党内分歧推迟到2022年表决\n参议院民主党人放弃了在今年通过总统拜登2万亿美元经济议程的打算，使白宫遭受政治打击。延期消息得到了两位知情人士证实。如此一来民主党内围绕支出法案的分歧可能会加剧，许多民主党人将该法案视为2022年中期选举的关键。\n4、欧洲央行维持三大利率不变 拉加德重申明年不太可能加息\n当地时间周四(12月16日)，欧洲央行在德国法兰克福举行的管委会会议上决定，维持三大关键利率不变，符合市场预期。同时决定在明年一季度放缓为应对疫情而采取的“紧急购债计划(PEPP)”，该计划也将按原定时间在明年三月底终止。\n5、英国央行在疫情危机爆发以来首次加息 以对抗通胀飙升\n在英国央行之前，美联储已经转向了更鹰派的立场大多数经济学家之前预计英国央行维持利率不变。英国央行自新冠疫情爆发以来首次加息。尽管创纪录的新冠感染病例给经济带来威胁，但该国依然在全球率先行动以对抗通胀飙升。\n6、美联储隔夜逆回购连续第二天创下历史新高\n周四，美联储隔夜逆回购协议的使用量增加365亿美元，达到1.658万亿美元。这超过了周三创下的历史纪录1.621万亿美元。周四有78家对手方利用了这一工具。\n随着机构对存放短期现金的需求增加，今年美联储逆回购工具的使用规模飙升。政府现金余额下降以及对突破债务上限的担忧也起到了推波助澜的作用。\n公司新闻\n1、贝壳股价周四收盘跌近2% 此前遭浑水公司做空\n贝壳股价周四收盘下跌1.98%，报18.31美元，该公司此前遭知名做空机构浑水公司（Muddy Waters Research）做空。在浑水公司造假指控下，贝壳股价周四经历了“过山车”行情。贝壳股价在浑水做空报告发布后，盘前跌一度大跌10%，随后该公司的回应令股价拉升，盘中一度大涨14%，但临近午盘再度回落，此后维持低位震荡。\n2、携程Q3财报：前三季度总营收恢复至疫情前56%，国际业务成突破口\n12月16日，携程集团发布了截至2021年9月30日第三季度未经审计的财务业绩。财报显示，今年第三季度，携程实现营收53亿元，经调整EBITDA为5.37亿元，经调整EBITDA利润率为10%。同时，归属于携程股东的净亏损为8.49亿元（约合1.31亿美元），上年同期录得净利润16亿元。\n3、美国疾控中心专家表示辉瑞和Moderna的疫苗优于强生\n美国公共卫生顾问表示，Moderna和辉瑞的mRNA疫苗比强生疫苗更适合成年人使用。美国疾控中心免疫实践咨询委员会周四开会，15名成员一致投票同意关于强生疫苗的建议。此前，美国监管机构修改关于强生疫苗的情况说明，就该疫苗可能引发罕见的血栓综合症发出警告。\n4、报道称苹果为南加州办事处招聘工程师 以开发自研无线芯片\n据报道，苹果公司正在为南加州的一个办事处招聘工程师，以开发自研无线芯片，并最终取代博通和思佳讯制造的芯片。\n报道称，苹果公司正在寻找“数十名”人员在尔湾开发芯片，该地区靠近博通、思佳讯和其他芯片制造商的所在地。\n5、Rivian Q3财报：净亏损扩大至12.3亿美元 官宣50亿美元建新厂\n美股周四盘后，刚刚在11月IPO狂揽137亿美元融资的电动车概念股Rivian发布上市后首份财报，首次取得营收和亏损扩大也在市场的意料之中。\n根据财报披露，公司今年三季度总共实现营收100万美元，营运损失7.76亿美元，净亏损12.33亿美元，去年同期亏损2.88亿美元。\n6、成长股逆风不止 Adobe疲软前瞻指引导致股价大跌逾10%\n当地时间周四，美股软件巨头Adobe发布截至12月3日的2021财年四季报，虽然财报本身创出营收新高，但逊于预期的前瞻指引再度引发了投资者抛售，截至发稿公司股价跌10.81%。\n7、瑞幸咖啡4.6亿美元债务重组获得美国法院批准\n瑞幸咖啡的债务重组计划获得美国曼哈顿一名联邦法官的同意，意味着这项在开曼群岛法院制定的安排可以在美国实施。根据法院文件，4.6亿美元票据的持有人将获得3.2亿美元现金加新债券。该计划还了结了股东在瑞幸咖啡被指虚报销售额后发起的很多诉讼。该公司高层还在继续应对部分股东诉讼。瑞幸咖啡美股粉单市场目前跌2.2%。\n8、达美航空预计2022年会盈利，2024年营收有望超500亿美元\n达美航空(DAL.US)表示，该公司预计将在2022年实现有意义的盈利，并在2024年超越疫情前盈利水平。\n达美航空在其资本市场日活动上介绍了其战略重点，财务方面的首要任务是恢复其财务基础，重点关注效率和现金产生，到2024年实现投资级别指标。\n9、卡骆驰：一双橡胶鞋撑起了股价五年飙升近2000%\n今年迄今为止，卡骆驰股价已飙升近130%，5年涨幅超过1,900%，主导了标普400非必需消费品板块在此期间85%的涨幅。相比之下，以看似火箭式的涨幅和直言不讳的CEO而闻名的特斯拉股价在这段时间飙升了约2100%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0,".IXIC":0,".DJI":0,"AAPL":0,"03086":0,".SPX":0,"TTTN":0,"QNETCN":0}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2889,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690011831,"gmtCreate":1639613183445,"gmtModify":1639613183694,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690011831","repostId":"2191499479","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2191499479","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639604040,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2191499479?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 05:34","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"外媒头条：美联储官宣加速Taper！暗示明年加息三次","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2191499479","media":"市场资讯","summary":"　　美联储周三向市场提供了多项迹象，表明其自新冠疫情开始以来的超宽松政策即将结束，其举措甚至比市场预期的还要激进。　　美联储点阵图显示，所有委员均预计美联储将在2022年开始加息，具体为2022年和2023年分别加息三次。委员们对政策举措持鹰派态度，坚定地倾向于加息。在18名FOMC委员中，12名委员认为明年至少将加息3次，6名预计明年加息不到3次，没有任何委员看到明年利率保持当前近零水平。","content":"<p><b>全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>1、美联储维持利率不变 宣布加速Taper 点阵图显示明年加息三次</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>2、Omicron加速蔓延 英国Covid病例创下纪录高点</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>3、美国11月零售销售增幅低于预期 表明高通胀正在抑制消费</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>4、全球债务达到创纪录226万亿美元 IMF担心利率上升带来可持续性风险</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>5、美国证券交易委员会计划收紧企业高管的股票出售规定</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>6、美联储隔夜逆回购使用规模再创历史新高 达到1.62万亿美元</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/50acb966ae0fa22fd804334cd3285156\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>美联储维持利率不变 宣布加速Taper 点阵图显示明年加息三次</b></p>\n<p>美联储周三向市场提供了多项迹象，表明其自新冠疫情开始以来的超宽松政策即将结束，其举措甚至比市场预期的还要激进。</p>\n<p>美国联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）当地时间周三公布最新利率决议，将基准利率维持在0%-0.25%区间不变，将超额准备金利率（IOER）维持在0.15%不变，将隔夜逆回购利率维持在0.05%不变，符合市场的普遍预期。</p>\n<p>FOMC声明称，从明年1月起，将每月资产购买规模减少300亿美元，即月度美国国债购买规模降低200亿美元、抵押贷款支持证券（MBS）减少100亿美元，此前为每月减少150亿美元。声明称，委员会认为，可能每月都适合这样减少净购买资产，但如果经济前景发生变化，将准备调整购债速度。</p>\n<p>美联储点阵图显示，所有委员均预计美联储将在2022年开始加息，具体为2022年和2023年分别加息三次。委员们对政策举措持鹰派态度，坚定地倾向于加息。在18名FOMC委员中，12名委员认为明年至少将加息3次，6名预计明年加息不到3次，没有任何委员看到明年利率保持当前近零水平。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/18b297bd677c579650af4b7c8b9df6cd\" tg-width=\"480\" tg-height=\"360\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Omicron加速蔓延 英国Covid病例创下纪录高点</b></p>\n<p>英国周三报告了78610例新增新冠病例，为大流行病爆发以来新高，凸显出omicron变异毒株的高传播性。</p>\n<p>之前的纪录高点是在1月8日的68053例，当时英国正处于阿尔法变种引发疫情浪潮、英国进入封锁状态几天之后。</p>\n<p>科研顾问警告称，首相鲍里斯·约翰逊称之为“海啸般的”一波omicron感染浪潮将导致住院人数增加。</p>\n<p>目前尚不清楚疫苗对这种变异毒株有多大效力，不过早期研究表明，两剂疫苗加一剂加强针可以提供针对omicron毒株75%的保护。</p>\n<p>虽然英国的阳性检测结果正在加速增长，但死亡人数远低于大流行病早期的水平。科学家们希望即使在病例数上升的情况下，快速推进加强针的接种能够帮助将重症病例数保持在较低水平。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78b40d4e4573d972aa08df28c761e4bf\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>美国11月零售销售增幅低于预期 表明高通胀正在抑制消费</b></p>\n<p>美国11月零售销售增幅低于预期，表明在通胀率达到数十年来最高的背景下，消费者正在抑制购物。</p>\n<p>美国商务部周三的数据显示，11月份的总体零售额增长0.3%，10月份的数据向上修正为增长1.8%。不包括汽油和汽车，11月销售额增长0.2%。上述数字没有经过通胀调整。</p>\n<p>媒体调查得出的预测中值显示，经济学家预计11月整体零售额环比增长0.8%。</p>\n<p>弱于预期的报告可能反映了假日销售前移的影响，因为许多知道供应链困难的美国人比平常更早进行假日购物。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66939b0633e54bb821942a2020b57625\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>全球债务达到创纪录226万亿美元 IMF担心利率上升带来可持续性风险</b></p>\n<p>国际货币基金组织（IMF）称，全球债务去年飙升至创纪录的226万亿美元，随着利率上升，引发了对债务可持续性的担忧。</p>\n<p>IMF官员周三在一份报告中表示，快于预期的加息可能会给高负债国家带来压力，并迫使政府和企业削减债务和支出，损害经济增长。</p>\n<p>他们援引IMF最新的全球债务数据库称，2020年全球债务/GDP比率上升28个百分点，达到256%，是二战以来升幅最大的一年。</p>\n<p>随着利率上升，财政政策通常会调整，因为政府要拿更多钱还债，并削减支出以控制赤字。</p>\n<p>“如果全球利率上升速度快于预期且经济增长放缓，那么风险将被放大，”&nbsp;Vitor Gaspar牵头的IMF官员写道。“如果公共和私营部门被迫同时去杠杆，增长前景将受到影响。”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c8348539976fbadc99ebaa9f1763592\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>美国证券交易委员会计划收紧企业高管的股票出售规定</b></p>\n<p>长期以来，企业负责人一直被怀疑规避意在防止高层管理人员利用内线消息进行交易的规定。现在，美国证券交易委员会正想办法打击这类交易。</p>\n<p>监管机构正在处理一个争议的问题：什么时候可以允许可能接触到重要非公开消息的公司内部人士出售股票？目前，企业高层主管可以只在抛售股票的前几天拟定出售计划，参议员Elizabeth Warren和其他立法者指出，这使得他们能在发布足以影响股价的公司公告前提前动作。</p>\n<p>美国证券交易委员会官员称，作为回应，该委员会准备提出新规则，迫使公司内部人士在安排出售至真正卖出股票之间等待大约四个月的时间。</p>\n<p>该机构将在周三的会议上就提出新限制措施进行表决。现行法规于20年前制定，旨在帮助高层管理人员出售股票并避免日后被指控进行内线交易。但最近的学术研究显示，股票销售计划充斥着可疑的特定时点交易。证券交易委员会主席Gary Gensler于6月表示，这些与企业相关的政策“导致我们的内线交易规范出现了真正的裂缝”。</p>\n<p>“这项提案解决了我们发现的一些漏洞，”Gensler在计划投票前接受采访时说。“这将有助于增强对资本市场的信任。”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04efb4451f7dd35befcdc79a3423aa11\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>美联储隔夜逆回购使用规模再创历史新高 达到1.62万亿美元</b></p>\n<p>投资者在美联储一个重要政策工具存放的资金创下历史新高。</p>\n<p>八十五名对手方周三利用隔夜逆回购协议存入美联储的资金达到1.62万亿美元，打破了第三季度最后一个交易日创下的1.605万亿美元的纪录。</p>\n<p>隔夜逆回购使用规模创纪录的同时，将美国债务上限提高2.5万亿美元的法案已经获得议会通过，并将交由总统拜登签署。该法案将允许财政部补充已耗尽的现金储备，并消除政府债券违约的风险。</p>\n<p>据报道，拜登将于周四签署该法案。</p>\n<p>随着机构对存放短期现金的需求增加，今年美联储逆回购工具的使用规模飙升。政府现金余额下降以及对突破债务上限的担忧也起到了推波助澜的作用。</p>","source":"sina","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>外媒头条：美联储官宣加速Taper！暗示明年加息三次</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n外媒头条：美联储官宣加速Taper！暗示明年加息三次\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-16 05:34 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-12-16/doc-ikyakumx4410594.shtml><strong>市场资讯</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：\n\n1、美联储维持利率不变 宣布加速Taper 点阵图显示明年加息三次\n\n\n2、Omicron加速蔓延 英国Covid病例创下纪录高点\n\n\n3、美国11月零售销售增幅低于预期 表明高通胀正在抑制消费\n\n\n4、全球债务达到创纪录226万亿美元 IMF担心利率上升带来可持续性风险\n\n\n5、美国证券交易委员会计划收紧企业高管的股票出售规定\n\n\n6、美联储隔夜...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-12-16/doc-ikyakumx4410594.shtml\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/123472eab1159c5e881f8e540a346014","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF博时","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","PSQ":"做空纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","QLD":"2倍做多纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","QID":"两倍做空纳斯达克指数ETF-ProShares","OEX":"标普100","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-12-16/doc-ikyakumx4410594.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/b0d1b7e8843deea78cc308b15114de44","article_id":"2191499479","content_text":"全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：\n\n1、美联储维持利率不变 宣布加速Taper 点阵图显示明年加息三次\n\n\n2、Omicron加速蔓延 英国Covid病例创下纪录高点\n\n\n3、美国11月零售销售增幅低于预期 表明高通胀正在抑制消费\n\n\n4、全球债务达到创纪录226万亿美元 IMF担心利率上升带来可持续性风险\n\n\n5、美国证券交易委员会计划收紧企业高管的股票出售规定\n\n\n6、美联储隔夜逆回购使用规模再创历史新高 达到1.62万亿美元\n\n\n美联储维持利率不变 宣布加速Taper 点阵图显示明年加息三次\n美联储周三向市场提供了多项迹象，表明其自新冠疫情开始以来的超宽松政策即将结束，其举措甚至比市场预期的还要激进。\n美国联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）当地时间周三公布最新利率决议，将基准利率维持在0%-0.25%区间不变，将超额准备金利率（IOER）维持在0.15%不变，将隔夜逆回购利率维持在0.05%不变，符合市场的普遍预期。\nFOMC声明称，从明年1月起，将每月资产购买规模减少300亿美元，即月度美国国债购买规模降低200亿美元、抵押贷款支持证券（MBS）减少100亿美元，此前为每月减少150亿美元。声明称，委员会认为，可能每月都适合这样减少净购买资产，但如果经济前景发生变化，将准备调整购债速度。\n美联储点阵图显示，所有委员均预计美联储将在2022年开始加息，具体为2022年和2023年分别加息三次。委员们对政策举措持鹰派态度，坚定地倾向于加息。在18名FOMC委员中，12名委员认为明年至少将加息3次，6名预计明年加息不到3次，没有任何委员看到明年利率保持当前近零水平。\n\nOmicron加速蔓延 英国Covid病例创下纪录高点\n英国周三报告了78610例新增新冠病例，为大流行病爆发以来新高，凸显出omicron变异毒株的高传播性。\n之前的纪录高点是在1月8日的68053例，当时英国正处于阿尔法变种引发疫情浪潮、英国进入封锁状态几天之后。\n科研顾问警告称，首相鲍里斯·约翰逊称之为“海啸般的”一波omicron感染浪潮将导致住院人数增加。\n目前尚不清楚疫苗对这种变异毒株有多大效力，不过早期研究表明，两剂疫苗加一剂加强针可以提供针对omicron毒株75%的保护。\n虽然英国的阳性检测结果正在加速增长，但死亡人数远低于大流行病早期的水平。科学家们希望即使在病例数上升的情况下，快速推进加强针的接种能够帮助将重症病例数保持在较低水平。\n\n美国11月零售销售增幅低于预期 表明高通胀正在抑制消费\n美国11月零售销售增幅低于预期，表明在通胀率达到数十年来最高的背景下，消费者正在抑制购物。\n美国商务部周三的数据显示，11月份的总体零售额增长0.3%，10月份的数据向上修正为增长1.8%。不包括汽油和汽车，11月销售额增长0.2%。上述数字没有经过通胀调整。\n媒体调查得出的预测中值显示，经济学家预计11月整体零售额环比增长0.8%。\n弱于预期的报告可能反映了假日销售前移的影响，因为许多知道供应链困难的美国人比平常更早进行假日购物。\n\n全球债务达到创纪录226万亿美元 IMF担心利率上升带来可持续性风险\n国际货币基金组织（IMF）称，全球债务去年飙升至创纪录的226万亿美元，随着利率上升，引发了对债务可持续性的担忧。\nIMF官员周三在一份报告中表示，快于预期的加息可能会给高负债国家带来压力，并迫使政府和企业削减债务和支出，损害经济增长。\n他们援引IMF最新的全球债务数据库称，2020年全球债务/GDP比率上升28个百分点，达到256%，是二战以来升幅最大的一年。\n随着利率上升，财政政策通常会调整，因为政府要拿更多钱还债，并削减支出以控制赤字。\n“如果全球利率上升速度快于预期且经济增长放缓，那么风险将被放大，” Vitor Gaspar牵头的IMF官员写道。“如果公共和私营部门被迫同时去杠杆，增长前景将受到影响。”\n\n美国证券交易委员会计划收紧企业高管的股票出售规定\n长期以来，企业负责人一直被怀疑规避意在防止高层管理人员利用内线消息进行交易的规定。现在，美国证券交易委员会正想办法打击这类交易。\n监管机构正在处理一个争议的问题：什么时候可以允许可能接触到重要非公开消息的公司内部人士出售股票？目前，企业高层主管可以只在抛售股票的前几天拟定出售计划，参议员Elizabeth Warren和其他立法者指出，这使得他们能在发布足以影响股价的公司公告前提前动作。\n美国证券交易委员会官员称，作为回应，该委员会准备提出新规则，迫使公司内部人士在安排出售至真正卖出股票之间等待大约四个月的时间。\n该机构将在周三的会议上就提出新限制措施进行表决。现行法规于20年前制定，旨在帮助高层管理人员出售股票并避免日后被指控进行内线交易。但最近的学术研究显示，股票销售计划充斥着可疑的特定时点交易。证券交易委员会主席Gary Gensler于6月表示，这些与企业相关的政策“导致我们的内线交易规范出现了真正的裂缝”。\n“这项提案解决了我们发现的一些漏洞，”Gensler在计划投票前接受采访时说。“这将有助于增强对资本市场的信任。”\n\n美联储隔夜逆回购使用规模再创历史新高 达到1.62万亿美元\n投资者在美联储一个重要政策工具存放的资金创下历史新高。\n八十五名对手方周三利用隔夜逆回购协议存入美联储的资金达到1.62万亿美元，打破了第三季度最后一个交易日创下的1.605万亿美元的纪录。\n隔夜逆回购使用规模创纪录的同时，将美国债务上限提高2.5万亿美元的法案已经获得议会通过，并将交由总统拜登签署。该法案将允许财政部补充已耗尽的现金储备，并消除政府债券违约的风险。\n据报道，拜登将于周四签署该法案。\n随着机构对存放短期现金的需求增加，今年美联储逆回购工具的使用规模飙升。政府现金余额下降以及对突破债务上限的担忧也起到了推波助澜的作用。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.9,"513500":0.9,"IVV":0.9,"MNQmain":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPXU":0.9,"TQQQ":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SSO":0.9,"OEX":0.9,"DOG":0.9,"QQQ":0.9,"DJX":0.9,"UPRO":0.9,"QID":0.9,"UDOW":0.9,"SDS":0.9,"PSQ":0.9,"SQQQ":0.9,"NQmain":0.9,"SH":0.9,"ESmain":0.9,"OEF":0.9,"QLD":0.9,"SDOW":0.9,"DDM":0.9,"DXD":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4172,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":877943632,"gmtCreate":1637882920247,"gmtModify":1637882920355,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877943632","repostId":"2186922113","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2186922113","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1637876097,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2186922113?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 05:34","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"外媒头条：高盛预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2186922113","media":"市场资讯","summary":"　　周四，欧洲央行公布了10月27日-28日的货币政策会议纪要。纪要显示，虽然通胀压力比之前预期的要更为持久，但货币政策仍必须保持耐心。　　首席经济学家Philip Lane预计中期通胀率低于2%，供应链瓶颈和能源价格被视为上行风险。同时以美元计价的原油价格上涨17%。　　他们表示，美联储随后将在9月和12月加息，并在2023年加息两次。他们先前预计的加息时间为7月和11月。　　根据高盛的新预测情景，美联储将在3月中旬结束资产购买计划。","content":"<p>全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：</p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>　　1、欧央行10月会议纪要：通胀压力不减 需为12月会议后保留充足的政策选项</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>　　2、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">高盛</a>预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>　　3、英国央行行长：如果通胀导致工资上涨 英国央行将不得不采取行动</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>　　4、美国史上最贵感恩节：不打算接受礼物的人创下历史新高</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>　　5、疫情再反复 欧洲药管局建议批准<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\">辉瑞</a>新冠疫苗用于5至11岁儿童</b>\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n <b>　　6、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TI\">意大利电信</a>CEO准备辞职 以加快美国私募巨头KKR收购要约的决定</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c037235cf275bbdf94f285e3a2597f1\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>欧央行10月会议纪要：通胀压力不减 需为12月会议后保留充足的政策选项</b></p>\n<p>周四（11月25日），欧洲央行公布了10月27日-28日的货币政策会议纪要。纪要显示，虽然通胀压力比之前预期的要更为持久，但货币政策仍必须保持耐心。</p>\n<p>纪要显示，“重要的是，管委会应当为未来的货币政策行动保留充分的选项，包括12月会议以后。”</p>\n<p>首席经济学家Philip Lane预计中期通胀率低于2%，供应链瓶颈和能源价格被视为上行风险。　“一些反映市场对短期货币市场利率未来路径预期的指标很难与欧洲央行的政策利率前瞻指引相协调”。</p>\n<p>欧元区前景因供应链瓶颈和输入价格压力蒙上阴影。自欧洲央行9月货币政策会议以来，欧元名义有效汇率下跌1%，欧元兑美元下跌1.9%。同时以美元计价的原油价格上涨17%。</p>\n<p>欧元区调和消费者物价指数（HICP）从8月的3.0%上升至9月的3.4%，9月能源因素约占整体通胀的一半。服务需求增加和供应摩擦推高了核心调和消费者物价指数（HICPX），该通胀率从8月的1.6%升至9月的1.9%。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dfe5a9166eef231f24c30288debbe4f6\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"275\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>高盛预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次</b></p>\n<p>高盛集团经济学家表示，在通胀压力攀升之际，预计美联储明年将比先前预期更快收紧货币政策。</p>\n<p>Jan Hatzius等高盛经济学家周四在报告中对客户表示，美联储明年1月起将把缩减大规模资产购置计划的幅度扩大一倍至300亿美元/月，并从6月开始将利率从零附近上调。</p>\n<p>他们表示，美联储随后将在9月和12月加息，并在2023年加息两次。他们先前预计的加息时间为7月和11月。</p>\n<p>根据高盛的新预测情景，美联储将在3月中旬结束资产购买计划。他们表示，美联储“有现实的可能性”从5月份开始加息，然后在7月和11月进一步加息。</p>\n<p>美联储副主席Rich Clarida和旧金山联储银行行长Mary Daly最近几天都表示，对加速减码持开放态度。本周公布的数据显示，消费者支出强劲，劳动力市场吃紧，通胀率达到三十年来的最高。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7e6e6283e93de88739ee7d9e1b350716\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>英国央行行长：如果通胀导致工资上涨 英国央行将不得不采取行动</b></p>\n<p>英国央行行长安德鲁·贝利表示，如果通胀开始促使工人要求涨薪并预计物价将继续上涨，那么决策者将不得不采取行动。</p>\n<p>“我们无法解决我们通常称之为第一轮效应的问题，”贝利周四在Cambridge Union向学生们表示。 “我们面临的风险是，它们变成嵌入式的问题。如果更高的通胀延续更长时间，我们会开始预计它会持续下去，然后进入薪资讨价还价-这个国家的劳动力市场非常紧张，毫无疑问-这时候<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CNBC\">中央银行</a>就不得不介入。”</p>\n<p>上述评论重申了英国央行货币政策委员会在前两次会议上提出的观点，即随着经济复苏和通胀上升，未来几个月利率可能会上升。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88fd85c9258adcaa94cc3a4a7e4cd0b7\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"309\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>美国史上最贵感恩节：不打算接受礼物的人创下历史新高</b></p>\n<p>进入今年最繁忙的购物季，不少人把今年感恩节称作“史上最贵感恩节”。</p>\n<p>全美零售联合会（National Retail Federation）预计今年假日销售将较上年同期增长8.5%至10.5%。但这一增长在很大程度上是由一小部分富有的消费者推动的。与此同时，一项调查显示，不打算接受任何礼物的人创下了历史新高。</p>\n<p>燃料、杂货和其他商品价格的上涨令许多购物者感到不安。根据密歇根大学消费者信心指数，消费者信心在11月跌至10年来的最低点，同时通货膨胀攀升至1990年代初以来的最高水平。消费者正在花钱，但他们对打开钱包越来越紧张。</p>\n<p>根据德勤的一项调查，11.5%的人计划在这个节日期间不花任何钱买礼物、礼品卡或其他娱乐项目。这是这家咨询公司有记录以来旁观的美国人的创纪录数量。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f80bc70c26d1136a176d3b4e248a385e\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"364\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>疫情再反复 欧洲药管局建议批准辉瑞新冠疫苗用于5至11岁儿童</b></p>\n<p>欧洲药品管理局25日发表公报，建议欧盟委员会批准美国辉瑞公司和德国生物新技术公司联合开发的新冠疫苗用于5至11岁儿童。此前，该疫苗已获批用于成人和12岁以上青少年。为这些儿童在欧洲病例激增之际首次接种该疫苗铺平了道路。</p>\n<p>这一批准正值欧洲再次成为疫情的中心，欧洲的病例和死亡人数约占全球的一半。</p>\n<p>尽管最终批准取决于欧盟执委会，但通常会遵循欧洲药品管理局的建议，一位欧盟消息人士对媒体表示，可能会在周五做出决定。</p>\n<p>自11月以来，欧洲再次成为全球疫情的“震中”，多个国家单日新增确诊病例居高不下。各国纷纷重拾或加强防疫举措，但趋严趋紧的防疫措施在荷兰、奥地利、比利时等国引发了不同程度的抗议活动，这进一步增加了病毒传播的风险，使欧洲防疫之路变得更加艰难。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b33a6bf9affdea0cef4601138b361b5d\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"359\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TI.A\">意大利电信</a>CEO准备辞职 以加快美国私募巨头KKR收购要约的决定</b></p>\n<p>周四，消息人士向媒体透露，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0H6I.UK\">意大利电信</a>（Telecom Italia，TIM）首席执行官Luigi Gubitosi已向董事会表示，如果此举有助于加快美国私募股权集团KKR收购意大利电信的决定，他愿意辞职。</p>\n<p>TIM董事会将于周五决定是否接纳美国私募基金KKR为首财团的收购建议，以及CEO&nbsp;Luigi Gubitosi的去留。TIM的风险管理委员会周四会先行评估集团财政状况。</p>\n<p>11月22日，意大利电信集团宣布，收到美国PE巨头KKR的非约束性收购要约，该要约的目的是将这家意大利最大的电信集团私有化。根据公告，KKR对意大利电信集团100%股权的报价为108亿欧元，加上公司现存净债务，收购要约总额接近330亿欧元。如果收购完成，这将是欧洲迄今为止规模最大的一起要约收购。</p>\n<p>TIM的第一大股东、法国传媒集团——<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0IIF.UK\">威望迪</a>（Vivendi）一直在推动TIM的掌门人换人。自7月以来，威望迪曾两次发布盈利预警，这些预警增强了Vivendi要求更换掌舵的决心。</p>","source":"highlight_sina","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>外媒头条：高盛预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n外媒头条：高盛预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 05:34 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-11-26/doc-ikyamrmy5121105.shtml><strong>市场资讯</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：\n\n　　1、欧央行10月会议纪要：通胀压力不减 需为12月会议后保留充足的政策选项\n\n\n　　2、高盛预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次\n\n\n　　3、英国央行行长：如果通胀导致工资上涨 英国央行将不得不采取行动\n\n\n　　4、美国史上最贵感恩节：不打算接受礼物的人创下历史新高\n\n\n　　5、疫情再反复 欧洲药管局建议批准辉瑞新冠疫苗用于5至11岁...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-11-26/doc-ikyamrmy5121105.shtml\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b6684517506a0b0f4c4c5a1c4889261","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF博时","GS":"高盛","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","QID":"两倍做空纳斯达克指数ETF-ProShares","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares","PSQ":"做空纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","SPY":"标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","QLD":"2倍做多纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","OEX":"标普100"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-11-26/doc-ikyamrmy5121105.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/b0d1b7e8843deea78cc308b15114de44","article_id":"2186922113","content_text":"全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：\n\n　　1、欧央行10月会议纪要：通胀压力不减 需为12月会议后保留充足的政策选项\n\n\n　　2、高盛预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次\n\n\n　　3、英国央行行长：如果通胀导致工资上涨 英国央行将不得不采取行动\n\n\n　　4、美国史上最贵感恩节：不打算接受礼物的人创下历史新高\n\n\n　　5、疫情再反复 欧洲药管局建议批准辉瑞新冠疫苗用于5至11岁儿童\n\n\n　　6、意大利电信CEO准备辞职 以加快美国私募巨头KKR收购要约的决定\n\n\n欧央行10月会议纪要：通胀压力不减 需为12月会议后保留充足的政策选项\n周四（11月25日），欧洲央行公布了10月27日-28日的货币政策会议纪要。纪要显示，虽然通胀压力比之前预期的要更为持久，但货币政策仍必须保持耐心。\n纪要显示，“重要的是，管委会应当为未来的货币政策行动保留充分的选项，包括12月会议以后。”\n首席经济学家Philip Lane预计中期通胀率低于2%，供应链瓶颈和能源价格被视为上行风险。　“一些反映市场对短期货币市场利率未来路径预期的指标很难与欧洲央行的政策利率前瞻指引相协调”。\n欧元区前景因供应链瓶颈和输入价格压力蒙上阴影。自欧洲央行9月货币政策会议以来，欧元名义有效汇率下跌1%，欧元兑美元下跌1.9%。同时以美元计价的原油价格上涨17%。\n欧元区调和消费者物价指数（HICP）从8月的3.0%上升至9月的3.4%，9月能源因素约占整体通胀的一半。服务需求增加和供应摩擦推高了核心调和消费者物价指数（HICPX），该通胀率从8月的1.6%升至9月的1.9%。\n\n高盛预计美联储将迫于通胀压力于2022年加息3次\n高盛集团经济学家表示，在通胀压力攀升之际，预计美联储明年将比先前预期更快收紧货币政策。\nJan Hatzius等高盛经济学家周四在报告中对客户表示，美联储明年1月起将把缩减大规模资产购置计划的幅度扩大一倍至300亿美元/月，并从6月开始将利率从零附近上调。\n他们表示，美联储随后将在9月和12月加息，并在2023年加息两次。他们先前预计的加息时间为7月和11月。\n根据高盛的新预测情景，美联储将在3月中旬结束资产购买计划。他们表示，美联储“有现实的可能性”从5月份开始加息，然后在7月和11月进一步加息。\n美联储副主席Rich Clarida和旧金山联储银行行长Mary Daly最近几天都表示，对加速减码持开放态度。本周公布的数据显示，消费者支出强劲，劳动力市场吃紧，通胀率达到三十年来的最高。\n\n英国央行行长：如果通胀导致工资上涨 英国央行将不得不采取行动\n英国央行行长安德鲁·贝利表示，如果通胀开始促使工人要求涨薪并预计物价将继续上涨，那么决策者将不得不采取行动。\n“我们无法解决我们通常称之为第一轮效应的问题，”贝利周四在Cambridge Union向学生们表示。 “我们面临的风险是，它们变成嵌入式的问题。如果更高的通胀延续更长时间，我们会开始预计它会持续下去，然后进入薪资讨价还价-这个国家的劳动力市场非常紧张，毫无疑问-这时候中央银行就不得不介入。”\n上述评论重申了英国央行货币政策委员会在前两次会议上提出的观点，即随着经济复苏和通胀上升，未来几个月利率可能会上升。\n\n美国史上最贵感恩节：不打算接受礼物的人创下历史新高\n进入今年最繁忙的购物季，不少人把今年感恩节称作“史上最贵感恩节”。\n全美零售联合会（National Retail Federation）预计今年假日销售将较上年同期增长8.5%至10.5%。但这一增长在很大程度上是由一小部分富有的消费者推动的。与此同时，一项调查显示，不打算接受任何礼物的人创下了历史新高。\n燃料、杂货和其他商品价格的上涨令许多购物者感到不安。根据密歇根大学消费者信心指数，消费者信心在11月跌至10年来的最低点，同时通货膨胀攀升至1990年代初以来的最高水平。消费者正在花钱，但他们对打开钱包越来越紧张。\n根据德勤的一项调查，11.5%的人计划在这个节日期间不花任何钱买礼物、礼品卡或其他娱乐项目。这是这家咨询公司有记录以来旁观的美国人的创纪录数量。\n\n疫情再反复 欧洲药管局建议批准辉瑞新冠疫苗用于5至11岁儿童\n欧洲药品管理局25日发表公报，建议欧盟委员会批准美国辉瑞公司和德国生物新技术公司联合开发的新冠疫苗用于5至11岁儿童。此前，该疫苗已获批用于成人和12岁以上青少年。为这些儿童在欧洲病例激增之际首次接种该疫苗铺平了道路。\n这一批准正值欧洲再次成为疫情的中心，欧洲的病例和死亡人数约占全球的一半。\n尽管最终批准取决于欧盟执委会，但通常会遵循欧洲药品管理局的建议，一位欧盟消息人士对媒体表示，可能会在周五做出决定。\n自11月以来，欧洲再次成为全球疫情的“震中”，多个国家单日新增确诊病例居高不下。各国纷纷重拾或加强防疫举措，但趋严趋紧的防疫措施在荷兰、奥地利、比利时等国引发了不同程度的抗议活动，这进一步增加了病毒传播的风险，使欧洲防疫之路变得更加艰难。\n意大利电信CEO准备辞职 以加快美国私募巨头KKR收购要约的决定\n周四，消息人士向媒体透露，意大利电信（Telecom Italia，TIM）首席执行官Luigi Gubitosi已向董事会表示，如果此举有助于加快美国私募股权集团KKR收购意大利电信的决定，他愿意辞职。\nTIM董事会将于周五决定是否接纳美国私募基金KKR为首财团的收购建议，以及CEO Luigi Gubitosi的去留。TIM的风险管理委员会周四会先行评估集团财政状况。\n11月22日，意大利电信集团宣布，收到美国PE巨头KKR的非约束性收购要约，该要约的目的是将这家意大利最大的电信集团私有化。根据公告，KKR对意大利电信集团100%股权的报价为108亿欧元，加上公司现存净债务，收购要约总额接近330亿欧元。如果收购完成，这将是欧洲迄今为止规模最大的一起要约收购。\nTIM的第一大股东、法国传媒集团——威望迪（Vivendi）一直在推动TIM的掌门人换人。自7月以来，威望迪曾两次发布盈利预警，这些预警增强了Vivendi要求更换掌舵的决心。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.9,"513500":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"QLD":0.9,"MNQmain":0.9,"GS":0.9,"IVV":0.9,"OEF":0.9,"UPRO":0.9,"DJX":0.9,"UDOW":0.9,"PSQ":0.9,"ESmain":0.9,"QID":0.9,"SDS":0.9,"SDOW":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SH":0.9,"TQQQ":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"DXD":0.9,"NQmain":0.9,"SPXU":0.9,"SQQQ":0.9,"SPY":0.9,"QQQ":0.9,"DDM":0.9,"DOG":0.9,"OEX":0.9,"SSO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3001,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":824944264,"gmtCreate":1634273912231,"gmtModify":1634274404884,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CEI\">$Camber Energy(CEI)$</a>you are not alone….","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CEI\">$Camber Energy(CEI)$</a>you are not alone….","text":"$Camber Energy(CEI)$you are not alone….","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d8d7808520f19dd49caf227283b1753","width":"1284","height":"2538"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/824944264","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2865,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":812001785,"gmtCreate":1630539753647,"gmtModify":1631890444083,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"K&nbsp;","listText":"K&nbsp;","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/812001785","repostId":"2164192698","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4283,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818741118,"gmtCreate":1630452541634,"gmtModify":1631890444095,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌","listText":"👌","text":"👌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818741118","repostId":"2164869989","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3254,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":837016015,"gmtCreate":1629847636437,"gmtModify":1631890444106,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/837016015","repostId":"2161818081","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2042,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832783923,"gmtCreate":1629678229862,"gmtModify":1631890444120,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okay&nbsp;","listText":"Okay&nbsp;","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832783923","repostId":"1133957722","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2144,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832780360,"gmtCreate":1629678206750,"gmtModify":1631890444131,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked","listText":"Liked","text":"Liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832780360","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832717000,"gmtCreate":1629678190600,"gmtModify":1631890444148,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked","listText":"Liked","text":"Liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832717000","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1653,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832715761,"gmtCreate":1629678169353,"gmtModify":1631890444159,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked","listText":"Liked","text":"Liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832715761","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":619,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832715016,"gmtCreate":1629678146635,"gmtModify":1631890444167,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked&nbsp;","listText":"Liked&nbsp;","text":"Liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832715016","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":682,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832712220,"gmtCreate":1629678133560,"gmtModify":1631890444179,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked&nbsp;","listText":"Liked&nbsp;","text":"Liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832712220","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":784,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832716617,"gmtCreate":1629678113539,"gmtModify":1631890444195,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked&nbsp;","listText":"Liked&nbsp;","text":"Liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832716617","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":865,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832718406,"gmtCreate":1629678096405,"gmtModify":1631893546806,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked&nbsp;","listText":"Liked&nbsp;","text":"Liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832718406","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":731,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833644227,"gmtCreate":1629242709969,"gmtModify":1631893546812,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833644227","repostId":"2160880977","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839688341,"gmtCreate":1629156672383,"gmtModify":1631893546830,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839688341","repostId":"2160278089","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":817,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830639208,"gmtCreate":1629069441004,"gmtModify":1631893546831,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830639208","repostId":"1138705612","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138705612","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628995730,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138705612?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-15 10:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD, Intel, And Nvidia: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?<blockquote>AMD、英特尔和英伟达：哪个是最好的芯片股？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138705612","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"AMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.AMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips and have led to AMD gaining server CPU market share.Even so, Intel is the leader in the processor market and holds long-term advantages over AMD in R&D, marketing, and pricing.Nvidia is ahead of AMD in GPU technology and is leveraging its GPUs into adjacent end markets such as artificial intelligence.This left ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>AMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.</li>  <li>AMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips and have led to AMD gaining server CPU market share.</li>  <li>Even so, Intel is the leader in the processor market and holds long-term advantages over AMD in R&amp;D, marketing, and pricing.</li>  <li>Nvidia is ahead of AMD in GPU technology and is leveraging its GPUs into adjacent end markets such as artificial intelligence.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a8f0aee0f3d10db76a1ee18fe604b40\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"864\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Andy/iStock via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>AMD最近的CPU和GPU产品与英特尔和英伟达的产品相比更具竞争力。</li><li>事实证明，AMD的EPYC服务器芯片可以与某些英特尔芯片相媲美，甚至优于某些英特尔芯片，并使AMD获得了服务器CPU市场份额。</li><li>即便如此，英特尔仍是处理器市场的领导者，在研发、营销和定价方面相对于AMD拥有长期优势。</li><li>英伟达在GPU技术上领先于AMD，并正在利用其GPU进入人工智能等邻近的终端市场。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>安迪/iStock来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Intel (INTC) was once the microchip industry equivalent of the Colossus of Rhodes, a monument to the power of Moore’s law. However, the firm stumbled with its 10-nanometer process, and recently announced its 7-nm process will be delayed until 2023.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔（INTC）曾经是微芯片行业的巨人罗德斯岛，是摩尔定律力量的纪念碑。然而，该公司在10纳米工艺上遇到了麻烦，最近宣布其7纳米工艺将推迟到2023年。</blockquote></p><p> This left the door open to Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), and that firm has taken full advantage of the opportunity. AMD has taken a large share of the CPU market and is making inroads into the once nearly impenetrable server market.</p><p><blockquote>这为Advanced Micro Devices Inc.(AMD)敞开了大门，该公司充分利用了这个机会。AMD已经占据了CPU市场的很大份额，并正在进军曾经几乎难以渗透的服务器市场。</blockquote></p><p> AMD now has seven consecutive quarters of double-digit revenue growth under its belt, and it appears the firm is gaining momentum: management now guides for 60% revenue growth for the full year, up from the 50% forecast provided in the previous quarter.</p><p><blockquote>AMD目前已连续七个季度实现两位数的收入增长，而且该公司似乎正在获得动力：管理层目前预计全年收入增长60%，高于上一季度提供的50%的预测。</blockquote></p><p> However, AMD also competes with NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), and the latter company’s GPU technology is stealing market share. NVDA has also been successful in gaining access to adjacent markets with its GPUs, especially AI and automotive markets.</p><p><blockquote>然而，AMD也与英伟达公司（NVDA）竞争，后者公司的GPU技术正在窃取市场份额。NVDA还凭借其GPU成功进入了邻近市场，尤其是人工智能和汽车市场。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Ins And Outs of Intel</b></p><p><blockquote><b>英特尔的来龙去脉</b></blockquote></p><p> An understanding of Intel also provides insights into AMD. This is due to the overlap between the two companies, particularly in regards to x86 chips. Intel developed the x86 chip in 1978. To satisfy demands by IBM that Intel would not be the sole supplier of the chips, INTC provided x86 instruction set architecture licensing to AMD.</p><p><blockquote>对英特尔的了解也提供了对AMD的洞察。这是由于两家公司之间的重叠，特别是在x86芯片方面。英特尔在1978年开发了x86芯片。为了满足IBM要求英特尔不是芯片的唯一供应商，INTC向AMD提供了x86指令集架构许可。</blockquote></p><p> Consequently, Intel and AMD have a duopoly position in the PC and server markets, as nearly all computer software is written for x86 architecture. The result is that both have a wide moat related to the x86 ecosystem.</p><p><blockquote>因此，英特尔和AMD在PC和服务器市场处于双头垄断地位，因为几乎所有的计算机软件都是为x86架构编写的。结果是两者都拥有与x86生态系统相关的宽阔护城河。</blockquote></p><p> Gaming consoles in particular are based on x86 architecture due to those platforms generally providing more powerful CPUs and GPUs with multiple compute cores. Like PCs, consoles operate with games that use x86 based software. Once again, this stifles potential competition from ARM-based devices.</p><p><blockquote>特别是游戏控制台基于x86架构，因为这些平台通常提供具有多个计算核心的更强大的CPU和GPU。像PC一样，游戏机运行使用基于x86的软件的游戏。这再次扼杀了来自基于ARM的设备的潜在竞争。</blockquote></p><p> Until fairly recently, AMD was a distant second to INTC as a supplier of x86 chips. However, AMD teamed with Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM)to use that manufacturer’s 7nm process to surpass INTC in process technology. Combined with AMD’s developing new innovative chip designs, this one-two punch resulted in INTC losing significant market share.</p><p><blockquote>直到最近，AMD在x86芯片供应商方面还远远落后于INTC。然而，AMD与台积电（NYSE：TSM）合作，使用该制造商的7纳米工艺，在工艺技术上超越了INTC。再加上AMD正在开发新的创新芯片设计，这种组合拳导致INTC失去了大量的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> At the end of Q1, AMD held 19.30% of the x86 desktop&nbsp;market, a 70 basis point gain year-over-year. In Q2 AMD corralled 8% of the server market, up from a 5%&nbsp;market&nbsp;share in Q4 of 2019.</p><p><blockquote>截至第一季度末，AMD占据x86台式机市场19.30%的份额，同比增长70个基点。第二季度，AMD占据了服务器市场8%的份额，高于2019年第四季度5%的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> Despite these setbacks, it seems premature to view Intel as a moribund business. INTC is one of the largest semiconductor companies in the world. The firm dominates the server market, and still holds 60% of the global x86 CPU&nbsp;market.</p><p><blockquote>尽管遭遇了这些挫折，但将英特尔视为一个垂死的企业似乎还为时过早。INTC是世界上最大的半导体公司之一。该公司在服务器市场占据主导地位，并且仍然占据全球x86 CPU市场的60%。</blockquote></p><p> The company has an enormous R&amp;D budget, and it is expanding into new markets, primarily Artificial Intelligence, Field-Programmable Gate Array chips, and automotive offerings, through its acquisitions of Habana Labs, Altera, Movidius, and Mobileye.</p><p><blockquote>该公司拥有庞大的研发预算，并正在通过收购Habana Labs、Altera、Movidius和Mobileye扩展到新市场，主要是人工智能、现场可编程门阵列芯片和汽车产品。</blockquote></p><p> Investors should not be swayed by the claim that Intel’s new 10nm chips are inferior to 7nm solely on the basis that 7 is superior to 10. While once used to denote the technology level of a chip design, it has been misused to the point of being useless.</p><p><blockquote>投资者不应该仅仅因为7优于10而被英特尔新的10纳米芯片不如7纳米的说法所左右。虽然曾经用来表示芯片设计的技术水平，但它已经被误用到了无用的地步。</blockquote></p><p> However, there are a number of concerns that must be acknowledged. Intel lags competitors in the smartphone market. As consumers shift to mobile devices, this could result in a sustained headwind as smartphones take the place of PCs. On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that INTC’s server processor business has seen growth associated with the surge in mobile devices and cloud computing.</p><p><blockquote>然而，有一些问题必须承认。英特尔在智能手机市场落后于竞争对手。随着消费者转向移动设备，随着智能手机取代个人电脑，这可能会导致持续的阻力。另一方面，应该承认，INTC的服务器处理器业务随着移动设备和云计算的激增而增长。</blockquote></p><p> Intel also faces increased competition from AMD in the data center space, as well as customers developing their own ARM-based chips for CPUs.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔还面临着来自AMD在数据中心领域日益激烈的竞争，以及客户为CPU开发自己的基于ARM的芯片。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An Overview of AMD</b></p><p><blockquote><b>AMD概述</b></blockquote></p><p> In years past, INTC held the lion’s share of the x86 market. This was due in part to Intel’s leading-edge manufacturing combined with AMD’s wafer supply agreements with less than stellar GlobalFoundries.</p><p><blockquote>过去几年，INTC占据了x86市场的最大份额。这部分归功于英特尔领先的制造以及AMD与不太出色的GlobalFoundries签订的晶圆供应协议。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> However, a seismic shift occurred due to three factors: driven by innovative designs, AMD brought competitive products to market, AMD shifted to TSMC for production, and Intel faced repeated manufacturing delays. The two charts below document the progress the company has made.</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于三个因素，发生了翻天覆地的转变：在创新设计的推动下，AMD将有竞争力的产品推向市场，AMD转向台积电生产，英特尔面临一再的制造延迟。下面两张图表记录了公司取得的进展。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/903df41d5400c9807ff487a75a7e5450\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"989\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Q2 Earnings Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：第二季度收益报告</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/331cd14b666f520a62d0746d5fadfa5b\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"989\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Q2 Earnings Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：第二季度收益报告</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Like Intel, AMD’s primary products are CPUs and GPUs. AMD’s chips are designed for PCs, game consoles, servers, and blockchain applications. And like INTC, AMD’s offerings are largely protected from competition due to the preponderance of software for PCs and servers being designed for x86 architecture.</p><p><blockquote>与英特尔一样，AMD的主要产品是CPU和GPU。AMD的芯片专为PC、游戏机、服务器和区块链应用而设计。与INTC一样，由于为x86架构设计的PC和服务器软件占主导地位，AMD的产品在很大程度上免受竞争。</blockquote></p><p> AMD’s strong growth has largely come at the expense of Intel as AMD has steadily chipped away at the former company’s CPU market share.</p><p><blockquote>AMD的强劲增长很大程度上是以牺牲英特尔为代价的，因为AMD稳步蚕食了英特尔的CPU市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7f8fbcab5da8a24d01d2b6408bd5686\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：寻求阿尔法</span></p></blockquote></p><p> AMD’s focus on CPU and GPU semi-custom processor applications has resulted in their use in Microsoft Xbox and Sony PlayStation game consoles.</p><p><blockquote>AMD对CPU和GPU半定制处理器应用的关注导致了它们在微软Xbox和Sony PlayStation游戏机中的使用。</blockquote></p><p> In regards to PC integrated GPUs, AMD is roughly in parity with NVIDIA while INTC dominates with roughly 68% of the market.</p><p><blockquote>在PC集成GPU方面，AMD与NVIDIA大致相当，而INTC以大约68%的市场份额占据主导地位。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67a0fe74d986cf882623a8f39587d0d8\" tg-width=\"544\" tg-height=\"394\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:tom'sHARDWARE</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：汤姆五金</span></p></blockquote></p><p> However, NVIDIA dominates the discrete GPU space with an 80% plus market share with AMD sweeping up what is left. NVIDIA’s discrete GPUs are arguably superior to AMD’s (more on that later); therefore, investors should not look for growth here.</p><p><blockquote>然而，NVIDIA以80%以上的市场份额主导着独立GPU领域，AMD席卷了剩下的市场份额。NVIDIA的独立GPU可以说优于AMD的（稍后会详细介绍）；因此，投资者不应该在这里寻找增长。</blockquote></p><p> Although AMD’s EPYC server CPU products were competitive with that of rivals, initially the company relied on aggressive pricing to promote its first generation of EPYC offerings. However, the EPYC line has gained wider acceptance, and with the Milan processors, the company is gaining market share. As server CPUs provide a better profit margin than the company’s other products, expansion into that space should aid in driving revenue.</p><p><blockquote>尽管AMD的EPYC服务器CPU产品与竞争对手相比具有竞争力，但最初该公司依靠激进的定价来推广其第一代EPYC产品。然而，EPYC系列已经获得了更广泛的认可，随着米兰处理器的推出，该公司正在获得市场份额。由于服务器CPU比该公司的其他产品提供了更好的利润率，因此向该领域的扩张应该有助于增加收入。</blockquote></p><p> Late last year,AMD entered intoa deal&nbsp;to acquire&nbsp;Xilinx (XLNX), a leader in field programmable gate array (FPGA) chips. FPGAs can be used for a wide variety of applications. Because shifting to a competing FPGA provider requires retraining of engineers in software and design tools, customers are loath to make a switch to a competing vendor. Consequently, if the Xilinx deal goes through, AMD will have acquired a wide moat business. Management guides for operational efficiencies of approximately $300 million within 18 months of closing the transaction.</p><p><blockquote>去年年底，AMD达成协议收购现场可编程门阵列(FPGA)芯片领域的领导者Xilinx(XLNX)。FPGA可用于多种应用。由于转向竞争对手的FPGA提供商需要对工程师进行软件和设计工具方面的再培训，因此客户不愿意转向竞争对手的供应商。因此，如果Xilinx交易成功，AMD将获得一条宽阔的护城河业务。交易完成后18个月内运营效率约3亿美元的管理指南。</blockquote></p><p> The Xilinx acquisition should bolster AMD’s data center and artificial intelligence businesses.</p><p><blockquote>收购Xilinx应该会增强AMD的数据中心和人工智能业务。</blockquote></p><p> AMD agreed to acquire Xilinx for $35 billion in an all-stock transaction.</p><p><blockquote>AMD同意以350亿美元的全股票交易收购赛灵思。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A Survey of NVIDIA</b></p><p><blockquote><b>英伟达调查</b></blockquote></p><p> NVDA's focus on the graphics processing units market has led the company to a dominant position in the discrete GPU space. The firm is the leader in discrete GPUs for computing platforms, especially gaming consoles. The fact that Intel licensed intellectual property from NVIDIA to integrate GPUs into its PC chipset testifies to the lead the company maintains.</p><p><blockquote>NVDA对图形处理单元市场的关注使该公司在独立GPU领域占据了主导地位。该公司是计算平台（尤其是游戏机）独立GPU领域的领导者。英特尔从英伟达获得知识产权许可，将GPU集成到其PC芯片组中，这一事实证明了该公司保持的领先地位。</blockquote></p><p> The chart below provides a record of the burgeoning ASP the company has been able to command over the last half decade, beginning with the Pascal architecture in 2016, and progressing through Turing to Ampere.</p><p><blockquote>下图记录了该公司在过去五年中能够控制的蓬勃发展的ASP，从2016年的Pascal架构开始，通过Turing发展到Ampere。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fb1d71f9df02f6c63907fe784b2fd8\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:AMD Investor Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：AMD投资者介绍</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The firm’s chips are also found in many high-end PCs, and NVDA has particular strength in the incipient AI and self-driving vehicle markets.</p><p><blockquote>该公司的芯片也存在于许多高端PC中，NVDA在新兴的人工智能和自动驾驶汽车市场尤其具有优势。</blockquote></p><p> GPUs are being teamed with CPUs to&nbsp;enhance&nbsp;computation workloads. This stratagem is designed to bolster the ability of AI systems to perform computationally intensive tasks. AI related to&nbsp;autonomous&nbsp;vehicles is a developing strength for NVIDIA. Another arena in which the firm is making its mark is in cloud</p><p><blockquote>GPU正与CPU结合使用，以增强计算工作负载。这一策略旨在增强人工智能系统执行计算密集型任务的能力。与自动驾驶汽车相关的人工智能是英伟达的发展优势。该公司崭露头角的另一个领域是云领域</blockquote></p><p> AI and data centers pose the most likely avenue of growth for NVDA. To strengthen its position in both businesses, the company moved last year to acquire ARM Holdings (ARMHF) from parent company Softbank for $40 billion.</p><p><blockquote>人工智能和数据中心是NVDA最有可能的增长途径。为了加强其在这两项业务中的地位，该公司去年以400亿美元从母公司软银手中收购了ARM Holdings(ARMHF)。</blockquote></p><p> ARM is the globe’s largest licensor of chip designs. Its chips are ubiquitous and can be found in mobile phones, smart TVs, and tablet computers. 160 billion chips have been made using ARM designs.</p><p><blockquote>ARM是全球最大的芯片设计许可方。它的芯片无处不在，手机、智能电视、平板电脑都能找到。使用ARM设计制造了1600亿个芯片。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Perhaps of equal importance is that 13 million developers work with ARM devices. To place that in context, NVDA has 2 million developers working on its array of devices.</p><p><blockquote>也许同样重要的是，有1300万开发人员使用ARM设备。从背景来看，NVDA有200万开发人员在开发其设备系列。</blockquote></p><p> Unfortunately for investors, bothChinaand theU.K.are reportedly balking at approving the deal.</p><p><blockquote>对投资者来说不幸的是，据报道，中国和英国都不愿批准这笔交易。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Head-To-Head Comparisons</b></p><p><blockquote><b>头对头比较</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值指标</b></blockquote></p><p> The following chart provides a variety of metrics related to each stock's valuation. All data labeled forward is analysts’ next fiscal year consensus estimate.</p><p><blockquote>下图提供了与每只股票估值相关的各种指标。所有标有前瞻性的数据都是分析师对下一财年的一致预期。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1bdeabcd2ea473601fbaaaa03235de77\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha Premium/ chart by author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Seeking Alpha Premium/作者图表</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Next, I’m using a graph to provide PEG ratios for the three companies. As there can be fairly wide variations in PEG ratios due to analysts’ inputs, I prefer that readers have access to multiple sources when I find wide variance in the ratio.</p><p><blockquote>接下来，我用图表来提供这三家公司的PEG比率。由于分析师的输入可能会导致PEG比率存在相当大的差异，因此当我发现比率存在较大差异时，我希望读者能够访问多个来源。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/884fc2142d97afcc9e2308e50058dd45\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Chart by author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>作者图表</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Note that Seeking Alpha provides a three to five-year PEG, Schwab simply lists its metric as a PEG ratio, while Yahoo! Finance calculates a five-year ratio. This could explain some of the variance in the numbers provided.</p><p><blockquote>请注意，Seeking Alpha提供了三到五年的PEG，嘉信理财只是将其指标列为PEG比率，而雅虎！财务计算五年比率。这可以解释所提供数字中的一些差异。</blockquote></p><p> Perusing the first chart, it is obvious that NVDA is the most overvalued. It is also interesting to note that in the current P/E and the forward price/cash flow estimates show AMD as valued near the sector median.</p><p><blockquote>仔细阅读第一张图表，很明显NVDA是最被高估的。还值得注意的是，当前市盈率和远期价格/现金流估计显示AMD的估值接近行业中位数。</blockquote></p><p> Count me as an investor that places great emphasis on a stocks PEG Ratio. Viewing the second chart, AMD has the best PEG of the three companies. I also note that analysts from each source calculated AMD’s PEG ratio as better than the sector median.</p><p><blockquote>我是一个非常重视股票PEG比率的投资者。查看第二张图表，AMD的PEG是三家公司中最好的。我还注意到，各来源的分析师计算出AMD的PEG比率均优于行业中位数。</blockquote></p><p> Do not misinterpret my findings. While INTC has a lower valuation in many respects, when considering other factors, I rate AMD higher overall. In other words, it is not the cheapest valuation but the best valuation, for lack of a better means to articulate my view.</p><p><blockquote>不要误解我的发现。虽然INTC在很多方面的估值较低，但考虑到其他因素，我对AMD的整体评价较高。换句话说，这不是最便宜的估值，而是最好的估值，因为缺乏更好的方式来表达我的观点。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Advantage AMD</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=优势AMD</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Analysts’ Price Targets</b></p><p><blockquote><b>分析师的价格目标</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA shares currently trade for $202.95. The average 12-month price target of 33 analysts is $186.49. The average price target of the 17 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $210.53, about 3.7% above the current price of the stock.</p><p><blockquote>NVIDIA股价目前交易价格为202.95美元。33位分析师的平均12个月目标价为186.49美元。在最新财报发布后对该股进行评级的17名分析师的平均目标价为210.53美元，比该股当前价格高出约3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> AMD shares currently trade for $107.58. The average 12-month price target of 28 analysts is $108.56. The average price target of the 11 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $117.27, roughly 9% above the prevailing share price.</p><p><blockquote>AMD股价目前交易价格为107.58美元。28位分析师的平均12个月目标价为108.56美元。在最新财报发布后对该股进行评级的11位分析师的平均目标价为117.27美元，比当前股价高出约9%。</blockquote></p><p> Intel shares currently trade for $54.05. The average 12-month price target of 34 analysts is $59.86. The average price target of the 16 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $58.97, a 9% premium over the current share price.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔股价目前交易价格为54.05美元。34位分析师的平均12个月目标价为59.86美元。在最新财报发布后对该股进行评级的16位分析师的平均目标价为58.97美元，较当前股价溢价9%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors should be aware that it has been nearly three months since NVDA posted quarterly earnings while INTC and AMD reported recently.</p><p><blockquote>投资者应该知道，自NVDA公布季度收益而INTC和AMD最近公布季度收益以来，已经过去了近三个月。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Tie AMD/INTC</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=Tie AMD/INTC</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Growth Rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>增长率</b></blockquote></p><p> The next chart provides data for growth rates. Unless otherwise noted, the metrics reflect analysts' average two-year forecasts.</p><p><blockquote>下一张图表提供了增长率数据。除非另有说明，这些指标反映了分析师的平均两年预测。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8ae1b79b3731a985fc209e626ca4886\" tg-width=\"577\" tg-height=\"337\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha Premium/ Chart by author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Seeking Alpha Premium/作者图表</span></p></blockquote></p><p> While investors familiar with these three companies would expect INTC to perform poorly in relation to NVDA and AMD in regarding growth, in several cases Intel is projected to experience negative growth rates.</p><p><blockquote>虽然熟悉这三家公司的投资者预计INTC在增长方面的表现不如NVDA和AMD，但在某些情况下，英特尔预计将出现负增长率。</blockquote></p><p> Advanced Micro Devices projected growth leads that of NVIDIA in every category, and at times by very wide margins.</p><p><blockquote>Advanced Micro Devices的预计增长在每个类别中都领先于NVIDIA，有时甚至大幅领先。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Advantage AMD</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=优势AMD</b></blockquote></p><p> I considered providing a chart outlining the profitability of each company; however, suffice it to say that each is highly profitable, and that a juxtaposition of the three would result in a tie.</p><p><blockquote>我考虑提供一张图表，概述每家公司的盈利能力；然而，只要说每一个都是高利润就足够了，三者并置会导致平局。</blockquote></p><p> I often provide a comparison that breaks down dividend metrics, but AMD does not pay a dividend, and NVDA has an anemic yield. INTC currently yields about 2.6%. The dividend is well funded.</p><p><blockquote>我经常提供分解股息指标的比较，但AMD不支付股息，而NVDA的收益率也很低。INTC目前的收益率约为2.6%。股息资金充足。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Debt Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>债务指标</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA had $12.67 billion in cash and $5.96 billion at the end of the last quarter. Should the ARM acquisition meet approval, the deal is structured so that $21 billion of the $40 billion purchase price will be in stock.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达拥有126.7亿美元现金，上季度末为59.6亿美元。如果ARM收购获得批准，该交易的结构将使400亿美元收购价格中的210亿美元将是股票。</blockquote></p><p> AMD has restructured its debt resulting in reduced interest costs. AMD had about $3.8 billion in cash and $313 million in long-term debt at the end of the most recent quarter.</p><p><blockquote>AMD重组了债务，从而降低了利息成本。截至最近一个季度末，AMD拥有约38亿美元现金和3.13亿美元长期债务。</blockquote></p><p> Intel's has solid investment-grade credit ratings. The company held nearly $24.86 billion cash at the end of the last quarter and had $31.7 billion long-term debt.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔拥有可靠的投资级信用评级。截至上季度末，该公司持有近248.6亿美元现金，长期债务为317亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> All three firms have strong financial positions. Weighing the possibility that NVDA and AMD may add debt due to prospective acquisitions, I am rating the three firms as equals.</p><p><blockquote>这三家公司都拥有强劲的财务状况。考虑到NVDA和AMD可能因潜在收购而增加债务的可能性，我对这三家公司的评级相同。</blockquote></p><p> <b>R&amp;D Budgets</b></p><p><blockquote><b>研发预算</b></blockquote></p><p> This is the first time I have&nbsp;compared&nbsp;the R&amp;D budgets of companies for a head-to-head showdown. However, in the semiconductor industry, that can be of pivotal importance.</p><p><blockquote>这是我第一次比较企业的研发预算进行正面对决。然而，在半导体行业，这可能至关重要。</blockquote></p><p> Last fiscal year, Intel devoted over $13.5 billion to R&amp;D, NVDA spent nearly $2.83 billion, and AMD budgeted a bit over $1.9 billion on research and development.</p><p><blockquote>上一财年，英特尔在研发上投入了超过135亿美元，NVDA花费了近28.3亿美元，AMD的研发预算略高于19亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMD is at a clear disadvantage, and that weakness is magnified because it often competes against INTC and NVDA in different arenas. It should be noted that a portion of Intel’s R&amp;D is funneled to its foundry business. Nevertheless, it is the clear winner here, and AMD is the obvious loser.</p><p><blockquote>AMD处于明显的劣势，而且这种劣势被放大了，因为它经常在不同的领域与INTC和NVDA竞争。应该指出的是，英特尔的部分研发资金流向了其代工业务。尽管如此，它是这里明显的赢家，AMD是明显的输家。</blockquote></p><p> I should add that NVDA is chipping away at AMD’s share of the discrete GPU market, and I believe that trend will continue, in part due to the disparity in R&amp;D budgets.</p><p><blockquote>我应该补充一点，NVDA正在蚕食AMD在独立GPU市场的份额，我相信这种趋势将继续下去，部分原因是研发预算的差异。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Advantage INTC</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=优势INTC</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Bottom Line: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一句话：最好的芯片股是哪只？</b></blockquote></p><p> To arrive at an answer, much depends on whether NVIDIA can complete its acquisition of ARM.</p><p><blockquote>要得出答案，很大程度上取决于英伟达能否完成对ARM的收购。</blockquote></p><p> Because ARM processors are more power and cost-efficient than x86 chips, NVDA could gain market share in the data center space. Since around a third of Intel’s revenue flows from data centers, that could represent a headwind for INTC and a positive for NVDA. However, there is a good chance the deal will fail to close.</p><p><blockquote>由于ARM处理器比x86芯片更强大、更具成本效益，NVDA可以在数据中心领域获得市场份额。由于英特尔大约三分之一的收入来自数据中心，这可能对INTC来说是一个阻力，对NVDA来说是一个积极的因素。然而，这笔交易很有可能无法完成。</blockquote></p><p> The degree of success Intel finds as its&nbsp;planned&nbsp;foundries come online is another factor that should be weighed.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔计划的代工厂上线后取得的成功程度是另一个应该权衡的因素。</blockquote></p><p> A development to be weighed is that AMD has now reached parity with INTC in the PC market in terms of the quality of its products. Furthermore, AMD is gaining market share in the server market, and I expect that trend to continue.</p><p><blockquote>一个需要权衡的发展是，就其产品质量而言，AMD现在已经在PC市场上与INTC持平。此外，AMD正在服务器市场获得市场份额，我预计这一趋势将持续下去。</blockquote></p><p> On the other hand, AMD is losing share in the discrete GPU market to NVDA. NVDA has a technological lead in that space which will probably continue.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，AMD正在将独立GPU市场的份额输给NVDA。NVDA在该领域拥有技术领先地位，这种领先地位可能会持续下去。</blockquote></p><p> While AMD and NVDA are seen as growth machines, one should not ignore that Intel’s Internet of Things business increased by 47% in the last quarter. Mobileye also saw a surge in growth with revenue increasing 124%. Although these businesses only totaled $1.3 billion in revenue, a fraction of Intel's total revenue of $18.5 billion, they still represent areas of high growth.</p><p><blockquote>虽然AMD和NVDA被视为增长机器，但人们不应忽视英特尔的物联网业务在上个季度增长了47%。Mobileye也出现了大幅增长，收入增长了124%。尽管这些业务的总收入只有13亿美元，与英特尔185亿美元的总收入相比只是一小部分，但它们仍然代表着高增长领域。</blockquote></p><p> However, note the header refers to “chip stock.” Consequently, technological advantages are but one part of the puzzle. Any investment decision must take current valuations and prospective growth rates into account.</p><p><blockquote>但是，请注意标题指的是“芯片库存”。因此，技术优势只是难题的一部分。任何投资决策都必须考虑当前估值和预期增长率。</blockquote></p><p> With that in mind, I must rate NVIDIA as a HOLD due to current valuation and growth estimates. Note my rating is based on the current valuation of the stock. I acknowledge the exemplary leadership of the company and believe the long-term prospect for the stock is excellent.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到这一点，由于目前的估值和增长预期，我必须将英伟达评级为持有。请注意，我的评级基于该股票的当前估值。我承认该公司堪称典范的领导力，并相信该股票的长期前景非常好。</blockquote></p><p> I also rate INTC as a HOLD. I previously rated the company as a buy. While I still believe the firm will serve long-term investors well, I now believe its recovery will unfold over a long time span, and better opportunities are available.</p><p><blockquote>我也将INTC评级为持有。我之前将该公司评级为买入。虽然我仍然相信该公司将很好地为长期投资者服务，但我现在相信它的复苏将在很长一段时间内展开，并且会有更好的机会。</blockquote></p><p> I rate AMD as a BUY. This is based on the current valuations and growth rates outlined in this article. I’ll add that those metrics are buttressed by my perception that as Intel works on its recovery, AMD is likely to chip away at market share.</p><p><blockquote>我将AMD评级为买入。这是基于本文概述的当前估值和增长率。我要补充的是，这些指标得到了我的看法的支持，即随着英特尔努力复苏，AMD可能会蚕食市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> For additional insights into the technological aspects of an investment in AMD and INTC, I recommend an excellent article by SA&nbsp;contributor&nbsp;Keyanoush Razavidinani.</p><p><blockquote>为了更多地了解投资AMD和INTC的技术方面，我推荐SA撰稿人Keyanoush Razavidinani的一篇优秀文章。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD, Intel, And Nvidia: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?<blockquote>AMD、英特尔和英伟达：哪个是最好的芯片股？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD, Intel, And Nvidia: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?<blockquote>AMD、英特尔和英伟达：哪个是最好的芯片股？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-15 10:48</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>AMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.</li>  <li>AMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips and have led to AMD gaining server CPU market share.</li>  <li>Even so, Intel is the leader in the processor market and holds long-term advantages over AMD in R&amp;D, marketing, and pricing.</li>  <li>Nvidia is ahead of AMD in GPU technology and is leveraging its GPUs into adjacent end markets such as artificial intelligence.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a8f0aee0f3d10db76a1ee18fe604b40\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"864\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Andy/iStock via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>AMD最近的CPU和GPU产品与英特尔和英伟达的产品相比更具竞争力。</li><li>事实证明，AMD的EPYC服务器芯片可以与某些英特尔芯片相媲美，甚至优于某些英特尔芯片，并使AMD获得了服务器CPU市场份额。</li><li>即便如此，英特尔仍是处理器市场的领导者，在研发、营销和定价方面相对于AMD拥有长期优势。</li><li>英伟达在GPU技术上领先于AMD，并正在利用其GPU进入人工智能等邻近的终端市场。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>安迪/iStock来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Intel (INTC) was once the microchip industry equivalent of the Colossus of Rhodes, a monument to the power of Moore’s law. However, the firm stumbled with its 10-nanometer process, and recently announced its 7-nm process will be delayed until 2023.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔（INTC）曾经是微芯片行业的巨人罗德斯岛，是摩尔定律力量的纪念碑。然而，该公司在10纳米工艺上遇到了麻烦，最近宣布其7纳米工艺将推迟到2023年。</blockquote></p><p> This left the door open to Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), and that firm has taken full advantage of the opportunity. AMD has taken a large share of the CPU market and is making inroads into the once nearly impenetrable server market.</p><p><blockquote>这为Advanced Micro Devices Inc.(AMD)敞开了大门，该公司充分利用了这个机会。AMD已经占据了CPU市场的很大份额，并正在进军曾经几乎难以渗透的服务器市场。</blockquote></p><p> AMD now has seven consecutive quarters of double-digit revenue growth under its belt, and it appears the firm is gaining momentum: management now guides for 60% revenue growth for the full year, up from the 50% forecast provided in the previous quarter.</p><p><blockquote>AMD目前已连续七个季度实现两位数的收入增长，而且该公司似乎正在获得动力：管理层目前预计全年收入增长60%，高于上一季度提供的50%的预测。</blockquote></p><p> However, AMD also competes with NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), and the latter company’s GPU technology is stealing market share. NVDA has also been successful in gaining access to adjacent markets with its GPUs, especially AI and automotive markets.</p><p><blockquote>然而，AMD也与英伟达公司（NVDA）竞争，后者公司的GPU技术正在窃取市场份额。NVDA还凭借其GPU成功进入了邻近市场，尤其是人工智能和汽车市场。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Ins And Outs of Intel</b></p><p><blockquote><b>英特尔的来龙去脉</b></blockquote></p><p> An understanding of Intel also provides insights into AMD. This is due to the overlap between the two companies, particularly in regards to x86 chips. Intel developed the x86 chip in 1978. To satisfy demands by IBM that Intel would not be the sole supplier of the chips, INTC provided x86 instruction set architecture licensing to AMD.</p><p><blockquote>对英特尔的了解也提供了对AMD的洞察。这是由于两家公司之间的重叠，特别是在x86芯片方面。英特尔在1978年开发了x86芯片。为了满足IBM要求英特尔不是芯片的唯一供应商，INTC向AMD提供了x86指令集架构许可。</blockquote></p><p> Consequently, Intel and AMD have a duopoly position in the PC and server markets, as nearly all computer software is written for x86 architecture. The result is that both have a wide moat related to the x86 ecosystem.</p><p><blockquote>因此，英特尔和AMD在PC和服务器市场处于双头垄断地位，因为几乎所有的计算机软件都是为x86架构编写的。结果是两者都拥有与x86生态系统相关的宽阔护城河。</blockquote></p><p> Gaming consoles in particular are based on x86 architecture due to those platforms generally providing more powerful CPUs and GPUs with multiple compute cores. Like PCs, consoles operate with games that use x86 based software. Once again, this stifles potential competition from ARM-based devices.</p><p><blockquote>特别是游戏控制台基于x86架构，因为这些平台通常提供具有多个计算核心的更强大的CPU和GPU。像PC一样，游戏机运行使用基于x86的软件的游戏。这再次扼杀了来自基于ARM的设备的潜在竞争。</blockquote></p><p> Until fairly recently, AMD was a distant second to INTC as a supplier of x86 chips. However, AMD teamed with Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM)to use that manufacturer’s 7nm process to surpass INTC in process technology. Combined with AMD’s developing new innovative chip designs, this one-two punch resulted in INTC losing significant market share.</p><p><blockquote>直到最近，AMD在x86芯片供应商方面还远远落后于INTC。然而，AMD与台积电（NYSE：TSM）合作，使用该制造商的7纳米工艺，在工艺技术上超越了INTC。再加上AMD正在开发新的创新芯片设计，这种组合拳导致INTC失去了大量的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> At the end of Q1, AMD held 19.30% of the x86 desktop&nbsp;market, a 70 basis point gain year-over-year. In Q2 AMD corralled 8% of the server market, up from a 5%&nbsp;market&nbsp;share in Q4 of 2019.</p><p><blockquote>截至第一季度末，AMD占据x86台式机市场19.30%的份额，同比增长70个基点。第二季度，AMD占据了服务器市场8%的份额，高于2019年第四季度5%的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> Despite these setbacks, it seems premature to view Intel as a moribund business. INTC is one of the largest semiconductor companies in the world. The firm dominates the server market, and still holds 60% of the global x86 CPU&nbsp;market.</p><p><blockquote>尽管遭遇了这些挫折，但将英特尔视为一个垂死的企业似乎还为时过早。INTC是世界上最大的半导体公司之一。该公司在服务器市场占据主导地位，并且仍然占据全球x86 CPU市场的60%。</blockquote></p><p> The company has an enormous R&amp;D budget, and it is expanding into new markets, primarily Artificial Intelligence, Field-Programmable Gate Array chips, and automotive offerings, through its acquisitions of Habana Labs, Altera, Movidius, and Mobileye.</p><p><blockquote>该公司拥有庞大的研发预算，并正在通过收购Habana Labs、Altera、Movidius和Mobileye扩展到新市场，主要是人工智能、现场可编程门阵列芯片和汽车产品。</blockquote></p><p> Investors should not be swayed by the claim that Intel’s new 10nm chips are inferior to 7nm solely on the basis that 7 is superior to 10. While once used to denote the technology level of a chip design, it has been misused to the point of being useless.</p><p><blockquote>投资者不应该仅仅因为7优于10而被英特尔新的10纳米芯片不如7纳米的说法所左右。虽然曾经用来表示芯片设计的技术水平，但它已经被误用到了无用的地步。</blockquote></p><p> However, there are a number of concerns that must be acknowledged. Intel lags competitors in the smartphone market. As consumers shift to mobile devices, this could result in a sustained headwind as smartphones take the place of PCs. On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that INTC’s server processor business has seen growth associated with the surge in mobile devices and cloud computing.</p><p><blockquote>然而，有一些问题必须承认。英特尔在智能手机市场落后于竞争对手。随着消费者转向移动设备，随着智能手机取代个人电脑，这可能会导致持续的阻力。另一方面，应该承认，INTC的服务器处理器业务随着移动设备和云计算的激增而增长。</blockquote></p><p> Intel also faces increased competition from AMD in the data center space, as well as customers developing their own ARM-based chips for CPUs.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔还面临着来自AMD在数据中心领域日益激烈的竞争，以及客户为CPU开发自己的基于ARM的芯片。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An Overview of AMD</b></p><p><blockquote><b>AMD概述</b></blockquote></p><p> In years past, INTC held the lion’s share of the x86 market. This was due in part to Intel’s leading-edge manufacturing combined with AMD’s wafer supply agreements with less than stellar GlobalFoundries.</p><p><blockquote>过去几年，INTC占据了x86市场的最大份额。这部分归功于英特尔领先的制造以及AMD与不太出色的GlobalFoundries签订的晶圆供应协议。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> However, a seismic shift occurred due to three factors: driven by innovative designs, AMD brought competitive products to market, AMD shifted to TSMC for production, and Intel faced repeated manufacturing delays. The two charts below document the progress the company has made.</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于三个因素，发生了翻天覆地的转变：在创新设计的推动下，AMD将有竞争力的产品推向市场，AMD转向台积电生产，英特尔面临一再的制造延迟。下面两张图表记录了公司取得的进展。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/903df41d5400c9807ff487a75a7e5450\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"989\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Q2 Earnings Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：第二季度收益报告</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/331cd14b666f520a62d0746d5fadfa5b\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"989\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Q2 Earnings Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：第二季度收益报告</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Like Intel, AMD’s primary products are CPUs and GPUs. AMD’s chips are designed for PCs, game consoles, servers, and blockchain applications. And like INTC, AMD’s offerings are largely protected from competition due to the preponderance of software for PCs and servers being designed for x86 architecture.</p><p><blockquote>与英特尔一样，AMD的主要产品是CPU和GPU。AMD的芯片专为PC、游戏机、服务器和区块链应用而设计。与INTC一样，由于为x86架构设计的PC和服务器软件占主导地位，AMD的产品在很大程度上免受竞争。</blockquote></p><p> AMD’s strong growth has largely come at the expense of Intel as AMD has steadily chipped away at the former company’s CPU market share.</p><p><blockquote>AMD的强劲增长很大程度上是以牺牲英特尔为代价的，因为AMD稳步蚕食了英特尔的CPU市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7f8fbcab5da8a24d01d2b6408bd5686\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：寻求阿尔法</span></p></blockquote></p><p> AMD’s focus on CPU and GPU semi-custom processor applications has resulted in their use in Microsoft Xbox and Sony PlayStation game consoles.</p><p><blockquote>AMD对CPU和GPU半定制处理器应用的关注导致了它们在微软Xbox和Sony PlayStation游戏机中的使用。</blockquote></p><p> In regards to PC integrated GPUs, AMD is roughly in parity with NVIDIA while INTC dominates with roughly 68% of the market.</p><p><blockquote>在PC集成GPU方面，AMD与NVIDIA大致相当，而INTC以大约68%的市场份额占据主导地位。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67a0fe74d986cf882623a8f39587d0d8\" tg-width=\"544\" tg-height=\"394\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:tom'sHARDWARE</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：汤姆五金</span></p></blockquote></p><p> However, NVIDIA dominates the discrete GPU space with an 80% plus market share with AMD sweeping up what is left. NVIDIA’s discrete GPUs are arguably superior to AMD’s (more on that later); therefore, investors should not look for growth here.</p><p><blockquote>然而，NVIDIA以80%以上的市场份额主导着独立GPU领域，AMD席卷了剩下的市场份额。NVIDIA的独立GPU可以说优于AMD的（稍后会详细介绍）；因此，投资者不应该在这里寻找增长。</blockquote></p><p> Although AMD’s EPYC server CPU products were competitive with that of rivals, initially the company relied on aggressive pricing to promote its first generation of EPYC offerings. However, the EPYC line has gained wider acceptance, and with the Milan processors, the company is gaining market share. As server CPUs provide a better profit margin than the company’s other products, expansion into that space should aid in driving revenue.</p><p><blockquote>尽管AMD的EPYC服务器CPU产品与竞争对手相比具有竞争力，但最初该公司依靠激进的定价来推广其第一代EPYC产品。然而，EPYC系列已经获得了更广泛的认可，随着米兰处理器的推出，该公司正在获得市场份额。由于服务器CPU比该公司的其他产品提供了更好的利润率，因此向该领域的扩张应该有助于增加收入。</blockquote></p><p> Late last year,AMD entered intoa deal&nbsp;to acquire&nbsp;Xilinx (XLNX), a leader in field programmable gate array (FPGA) chips. FPGAs can be used for a wide variety of applications. Because shifting to a competing FPGA provider requires retraining of engineers in software and design tools, customers are loath to make a switch to a competing vendor. Consequently, if the Xilinx deal goes through, AMD will have acquired a wide moat business. Management guides for operational efficiencies of approximately $300 million within 18 months of closing the transaction.</p><p><blockquote>去年年底，AMD达成协议收购现场可编程门阵列(FPGA)芯片领域的领导者Xilinx(XLNX)。FPGA可用于多种应用。由于转向竞争对手的FPGA提供商需要对工程师进行软件和设计工具方面的再培训，因此客户不愿意转向竞争对手的供应商。因此，如果Xilinx交易成功，AMD将获得一条宽阔的护城河业务。交易完成后18个月内运营效率约3亿美元的管理指南。</blockquote></p><p> The Xilinx acquisition should bolster AMD’s data center and artificial intelligence businesses.</p><p><blockquote>收购Xilinx应该会增强AMD的数据中心和人工智能业务。</blockquote></p><p> AMD agreed to acquire Xilinx for $35 billion in an all-stock transaction.</p><p><blockquote>AMD同意以350亿美元的全股票交易收购赛灵思。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A Survey of NVIDIA</b></p><p><blockquote><b>英伟达调查</b></blockquote></p><p> NVDA's focus on the graphics processing units market has led the company to a dominant position in the discrete GPU space. The firm is the leader in discrete GPUs for computing platforms, especially gaming consoles. The fact that Intel licensed intellectual property from NVIDIA to integrate GPUs into its PC chipset testifies to the lead the company maintains.</p><p><blockquote>NVDA对图形处理单元市场的关注使该公司在独立GPU领域占据了主导地位。该公司是计算平台（尤其是游戏机）独立GPU领域的领导者。英特尔从英伟达获得知识产权许可，将GPU集成到其PC芯片组中，这一事实证明了该公司保持的领先地位。</blockquote></p><p> The chart below provides a record of the burgeoning ASP the company has been able to command over the last half decade, beginning with the Pascal architecture in 2016, and progressing through Turing to Ampere.</p><p><blockquote>下图记录了该公司在过去五年中能够控制的蓬勃发展的ASP，从2016年的Pascal架构开始，通过Turing发展到Ampere。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fb1d71f9df02f6c63907fe784b2fd8\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:AMD Investor Presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：AMD投资者介绍</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The firm’s chips are also found in many high-end PCs, and NVDA has particular strength in the incipient AI and self-driving vehicle markets.</p><p><blockquote>该公司的芯片也存在于许多高端PC中，NVDA在新兴的人工智能和自动驾驶汽车市场尤其具有优势。</blockquote></p><p> GPUs are being teamed with CPUs to&nbsp;enhance&nbsp;computation workloads. This stratagem is designed to bolster the ability of AI systems to perform computationally intensive tasks. AI related to&nbsp;autonomous&nbsp;vehicles is a developing strength for NVIDIA. Another arena in which the firm is making its mark is in cloud</p><p><blockquote>GPU正与CPU结合使用，以增强计算工作负载。这一策略旨在增强人工智能系统执行计算密集型任务的能力。与自动驾驶汽车相关的人工智能是英伟达的发展优势。该公司崭露头角的另一个领域是云领域</blockquote></p><p> AI and data centers pose the most likely avenue of growth for NVDA. To strengthen its position in both businesses, the company moved last year to acquire ARM Holdings (ARMHF) from parent company Softbank for $40 billion.</p><p><blockquote>人工智能和数据中心是NVDA最有可能的增长途径。为了加强其在这两项业务中的地位，该公司去年以400亿美元从母公司软银手中收购了ARM Holdings(ARMHF)。</blockquote></p><p> ARM is the globe’s largest licensor of chip designs. Its chips are ubiquitous and can be found in mobile phones, smart TVs, and tablet computers. 160 billion chips have been made using ARM designs.</p><p><blockquote>ARM是全球最大的芯片设计许可方。它的芯片无处不在，手机、智能电视、平板电脑都能找到。使用ARM设计制造了1600亿个芯片。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Perhaps of equal importance is that 13 million developers work with ARM devices. To place that in context, NVDA has 2 million developers working on its array of devices.</p><p><blockquote>也许同样重要的是，有1300万开发人员使用ARM设备。从背景来看，NVDA有200万开发人员在开发其设备系列。</blockquote></p><p> Unfortunately for investors, bothChinaand theU.K.are reportedly balking at approving the deal.</p><p><blockquote>对投资者来说不幸的是，据报道，中国和英国都不愿批准这笔交易。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Head-To-Head Comparisons</b></p><p><blockquote><b>头对头比较</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值指标</b></blockquote></p><p> The following chart provides a variety of metrics related to each stock's valuation. All data labeled forward is analysts’ next fiscal year consensus estimate.</p><p><blockquote>下图提供了与每只股票估值相关的各种指标。所有标有前瞻性的数据都是分析师对下一财年的一致预期。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1bdeabcd2ea473601fbaaaa03235de77\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha Premium/ chart by author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Seeking Alpha Premium/作者图表</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Next, I’m using a graph to provide PEG ratios for the three companies. As there can be fairly wide variations in PEG ratios due to analysts’ inputs, I prefer that readers have access to multiple sources when I find wide variance in the ratio.</p><p><blockquote>接下来，我用图表来提供这三家公司的PEG比率。由于分析师的输入可能会导致PEG比率存在相当大的差异，因此当我发现比率存在较大差异时，我希望读者能够访问多个来源。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/884fc2142d97afcc9e2308e50058dd45\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Chart by author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>作者图表</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Note that Seeking Alpha provides a three to five-year PEG, Schwab simply lists its metric as a PEG ratio, while Yahoo! Finance calculates a five-year ratio. This could explain some of the variance in the numbers provided.</p><p><blockquote>请注意，Seeking Alpha提供了三到五年的PEG，嘉信理财只是将其指标列为PEG比率，而雅虎！财务计算五年比率。这可以解释所提供数字中的一些差异。</blockquote></p><p> Perusing the first chart, it is obvious that NVDA is the most overvalued. It is also interesting to note that in the current P/E and the forward price/cash flow estimates show AMD as valued near the sector median.</p><p><blockquote>仔细阅读第一张图表，很明显NVDA是最被高估的。还值得注意的是，当前市盈率和远期价格/现金流估计显示AMD的估值接近行业中位数。</blockquote></p><p> Count me as an investor that places great emphasis on a stocks PEG Ratio. Viewing the second chart, AMD has the best PEG of the three companies. I also note that analysts from each source calculated AMD’s PEG ratio as better than the sector median.</p><p><blockquote>我是一个非常重视股票PEG比率的投资者。查看第二张图表，AMD的PEG是三家公司中最好的。我还注意到，各来源的分析师计算出AMD的PEG比率均优于行业中位数。</blockquote></p><p> Do not misinterpret my findings. While INTC has a lower valuation in many respects, when considering other factors, I rate AMD higher overall. In other words, it is not the cheapest valuation but the best valuation, for lack of a better means to articulate my view.</p><p><blockquote>不要误解我的发现。虽然INTC在很多方面的估值较低，但考虑到其他因素，我对AMD的整体评价较高。换句话说，这不是最便宜的估值，而是最好的估值，因为缺乏更好的方式来表达我的观点。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Advantage AMD</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=优势AMD</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Analysts’ Price Targets</b></p><p><blockquote><b>分析师的价格目标</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA shares currently trade for $202.95. The average 12-month price target of 33 analysts is $186.49. The average price target of the 17 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $210.53, about 3.7% above the current price of the stock.</p><p><blockquote>NVIDIA股价目前交易价格为202.95美元。33位分析师的平均12个月目标价为186.49美元。在最新财报发布后对该股进行评级的17名分析师的平均目标价为210.53美元，比该股当前价格高出约3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> AMD shares currently trade for $107.58. The average 12-month price target of 28 analysts is $108.56. The average price target of the 11 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $117.27, roughly 9% above the prevailing share price.</p><p><blockquote>AMD股价目前交易价格为107.58美元。28位分析师的平均12个月目标价为108.56美元。在最新财报发布后对该股进行评级的11位分析师的平均目标价为117.27美元，比当前股价高出约9%。</blockquote></p><p> Intel shares currently trade for $54.05. The average 12-month price target of 34 analysts is $59.86. The average price target of the 16 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $58.97, a 9% premium over the current share price.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔股价目前交易价格为54.05美元。34位分析师的平均12个月目标价为59.86美元。在最新财报发布后对该股进行评级的16位分析师的平均目标价为58.97美元，较当前股价溢价9%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors should be aware that it has been nearly three months since NVDA posted quarterly earnings while INTC and AMD reported recently.</p><p><blockquote>投资者应该知道，自NVDA公布季度收益而INTC和AMD最近公布季度收益以来，已经过去了近三个月。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Tie AMD/INTC</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=Tie AMD/INTC</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Growth Rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>增长率</b></blockquote></p><p> The next chart provides data for growth rates. Unless otherwise noted, the metrics reflect analysts' average two-year forecasts.</p><p><blockquote>下一张图表提供了增长率数据。除非另有说明，这些指标反映了分析师的平均两年预测。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8ae1b79b3731a985fc209e626ca4886\" tg-width=\"577\" tg-height=\"337\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha Premium/ Chart by author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Seeking Alpha Premium/作者图表</span></p></blockquote></p><p> While investors familiar with these three companies would expect INTC to perform poorly in relation to NVDA and AMD in regarding growth, in several cases Intel is projected to experience negative growth rates.</p><p><blockquote>虽然熟悉这三家公司的投资者预计INTC在增长方面的表现不如NVDA和AMD，但在某些情况下，英特尔预计将出现负增长率。</blockquote></p><p> Advanced Micro Devices projected growth leads that of NVIDIA in every category, and at times by very wide margins.</p><p><blockquote>Advanced Micro Devices的预计增长在每个类别中都领先于NVIDIA，有时甚至大幅领先。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Advantage AMD</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=优势AMD</b></blockquote></p><p> I considered providing a chart outlining the profitability of each company; however, suffice it to say that each is highly profitable, and that a juxtaposition of the three would result in a tie.</p><p><blockquote>我考虑提供一张图表，概述每家公司的盈利能力；然而，只要说每一个都是高利润就足够了，三者并置会导致平局。</blockquote></p><p> I often provide a comparison that breaks down dividend metrics, but AMD does not pay a dividend, and NVDA has an anemic yield. INTC currently yields about 2.6%. The dividend is well funded.</p><p><blockquote>我经常提供分解股息指标的比较，但AMD不支付股息，而NVDA的收益率也很低。INTC目前的收益率约为2.6%。股息资金充足。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Debt Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>债务指标</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA had $12.67 billion in cash and $5.96 billion at the end of the last quarter. Should the ARM acquisition meet approval, the deal is structured so that $21 billion of the $40 billion purchase price will be in stock.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达拥有126.7亿美元现金，上季度末为59.6亿美元。如果ARM收购获得批准，该交易的结构将使400亿美元收购价格中的210亿美元将是股票。</blockquote></p><p> AMD has restructured its debt resulting in reduced interest costs. AMD had about $3.8 billion in cash and $313 million in long-term debt at the end of the most recent quarter.</p><p><blockquote>AMD重组了债务，从而降低了利息成本。截至最近一个季度末，AMD拥有约38亿美元现金和3.13亿美元长期债务。</blockquote></p><p> Intel's has solid investment-grade credit ratings. The company held nearly $24.86 billion cash at the end of the last quarter and had $31.7 billion long-term debt.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔拥有可靠的投资级信用评级。截至上季度末，该公司持有近248.6亿美元现金，长期债务为317亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> All three firms have strong financial positions. Weighing the possibility that NVDA and AMD may add debt due to prospective acquisitions, I am rating the three firms as equals.</p><p><blockquote>这三家公司都拥有强劲的财务状况。考虑到NVDA和AMD可能因潜在收购而增加债务的可能性，我对这三家公司的评级相同。</blockquote></p><p> <b>R&amp;D Budgets</b></p><p><blockquote><b>研发预算</b></blockquote></p><p> This is the first time I have&nbsp;compared&nbsp;the R&amp;D budgets of companies for a head-to-head showdown. However, in the semiconductor industry, that can be of pivotal importance.</p><p><blockquote>这是我第一次比较企业的研发预算进行正面对决。然而，在半导体行业，这可能至关重要。</blockquote></p><p> Last fiscal year, Intel devoted over $13.5 billion to R&amp;D, NVDA spent nearly $2.83 billion, and AMD budgeted a bit over $1.9 billion on research and development.</p><p><blockquote>上一财年，英特尔在研发上投入了超过135亿美元，NVDA花费了近28.3亿美元，AMD的研发预算略高于19亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMD is at a clear disadvantage, and that weakness is magnified because it often competes against INTC and NVDA in different arenas. It should be noted that a portion of Intel’s R&amp;D is funneled to its foundry business. Nevertheless, it is the clear winner here, and AMD is the obvious loser.</p><p><blockquote>AMD处于明显的劣势，而且这种劣势被放大了，因为它经常在不同的领域与INTC和NVDA竞争。应该指出的是，英特尔的部分研发资金流向了其代工业务。尽管如此，它是这里明显的赢家，AMD是明显的输家。</blockquote></p><p> I should add that NVDA is chipping away at AMD’s share of the discrete GPU market, and I believe that trend will continue, in part due to the disparity in R&amp;D budgets.</p><p><blockquote>我应该补充一点，NVDA正在蚕食AMD在独立GPU市场的份额，我相信这种趋势将继续下去，部分原因是研发预算的差异。</blockquote></p><p> <b>=Advantage INTC</b></p><p><blockquote><b>=优势INTC</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Bottom Line: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一句话：最好的芯片股是哪只？</b></blockquote></p><p> To arrive at an answer, much depends on whether NVIDIA can complete its acquisition of ARM.</p><p><blockquote>要得出答案，很大程度上取决于英伟达能否完成对ARM的收购。</blockquote></p><p> Because ARM processors are more power and cost-efficient than x86 chips, NVDA could gain market share in the data center space. Since around a third of Intel’s revenue flows from data centers, that could represent a headwind for INTC and a positive for NVDA. However, there is a good chance the deal will fail to close.</p><p><blockquote>由于ARM处理器比x86芯片更强大、更具成本效益，NVDA可以在数据中心领域获得市场份额。由于英特尔大约三分之一的收入来自数据中心，这可能对INTC来说是一个阻力，对NVDA来说是一个积极的因素。然而，这笔交易很有可能无法完成。</blockquote></p><p> The degree of success Intel finds as its&nbsp;planned&nbsp;foundries come online is another factor that should be weighed.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔计划的代工厂上线后取得的成功程度是另一个应该权衡的因素。</blockquote></p><p> A development to be weighed is that AMD has now reached parity with INTC in the PC market in terms of the quality of its products. Furthermore, AMD is gaining market share in the server market, and I expect that trend to continue.</p><p><blockquote>一个需要权衡的发展是，就其产品质量而言，AMD现在已经在PC市场上与INTC持平。此外，AMD正在服务器市场获得市场份额，我预计这一趋势将持续下去。</blockquote></p><p> On the other hand, AMD is losing share in the discrete GPU market to NVDA. NVDA has a technological lead in that space which will probably continue.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，AMD正在将独立GPU市场的份额输给NVDA。NVDA在该领域拥有技术领先地位，这种领先地位可能会持续下去。</blockquote></p><p> While AMD and NVDA are seen as growth machines, one should not ignore that Intel’s Internet of Things business increased by 47% in the last quarter. Mobileye also saw a surge in growth with revenue increasing 124%. Although these businesses only totaled $1.3 billion in revenue, a fraction of Intel's total revenue of $18.5 billion, they still represent areas of high growth.</p><p><blockquote>虽然AMD和NVDA被视为增长机器，但人们不应忽视英特尔的物联网业务在上个季度增长了47%。Mobileye也出现了大幅增长，收入增长了124%。尽管这些业务的总收入只有13亿美元，与英特尔185亿美元的总收入相比只是一小部分，但它们仍然代表着高增长领域。</blockquote></p><p> However, note the header refers to “chip stock.” Consequently, technological advantages are but one part of the puzzle. Any investment decision must take current valuations and prospective growth rates into account.</p><p><blockquote>但是，请注意标题指的是“芯片库存”。因此，技术优势只是难题的一部分。任何投资决策都必须考虑当前估值和预期增长率。</blockquote></p><p> With that in mind, I must rate NVIDIA as a HOLD due to current valuation and growth estimates. Note my rating is based on the current valuation of the stock. I acknowledge the exemplary leadership of the company and believe the long-term prospect for the stock is excellent.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到这一点，由于目前的估值和增长预期，我必须将英伟达评级为持有。请注意，我的评级基于该股票的当前估值。我承认该公司堪称典范的领导力，并相信该股票的长期前景非常好。</blockquote></p><p> I also rate INTC as a HOLD. I previously rated the company as a buy. While I still believe the firm will serve long-term investors well, I now believe its recovery will unfold over a long time span, and better opportunities are available.</p><p><blockquote>我也将INTC评级为持有。我之前将该公司评级为买入。虽然我仍然相信该公司将很好地为长期投资者服务，但我现在相信它的复苏将在很长一段时间内展开，并且会有更好的机会。</blockquote></p><p> I rate AMD as a BUY. This is based on the current valuations and growth rates outlined in this article. I’ll add that those metrics are buttressed by my perception that as Intel works on its recovery, AMD is likely to chip away at market share.</p><p><blockquote>我将AMD评级为买入。这是基于本文概述的当前估值和增长率。我要补充的是，这些指标得到了我的看法的支持，即随着英特尔努力复苏，AMD可能会蚕食市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> For additional insights into the technological aspects of an investment in AMD and INTC, I recommend an excellent article by SA&nbsp;contributor&nbsp;Keyanoush Razavidinani.</p><p><blockquote>为了更多地了解投资AMD和INTC的技术方面，我推荐SA撰稿人Keyanoush Razavidinani的一篇优秀文章。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4448637-amd-intel-nvidia-best-chip-stock\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dad74e350b9b09d45929989f896aaa9d","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司","NVDA":"英伟达","INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4448637-amd-intel-nvidia-best-chip-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138705612","content_text":"Summary\n\nAMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.\nAMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips and have led to AMD gaining server CPU market share.\nEven so, Intel is the leader in the processor market and holds long-term advantages over AMD in R&D, marketing, and pricing.\nNvidia is ahead of AMD in GPU technology and is leveraging its GPUs into adjacent end markets such as artificial intelligence.\n\nAndy/iStock via Getty Images\nIntel (INTC) was once the microchip industry equivalent of the Colossus of Rhodes, a monument to the power of Moore’s law. However, the firm stumbled with its 10-nanometer process, and recently announced its 7-nm process will be delayed until 2023.\nThis left the door open to Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), and that firm has taken full advantage of the opportunity. AMD has taken a large share of the CPU market and is making inroads into the once nearly impenetrable server market.\nAMD now has seven consecutive quarters of double-digit revenue growth under its belt, and it appears the firm is gaining momentum: management now guides for 60% revenue growth for the full year, up from the 50% forecast provided in the previous quarter.\nHowever, AMD also competes with NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), and the latter company’s GPU technology is stealing market share. NVDA has also been successful in gaining access to adjacent markets with its GPUs, especially AI and automotive markets.\nThe Ins And Outs of Intel\nAn understanding of Intel also provides insights into AMD. This is due to the overlap between the two companies, particularly in regards to x86 chips. Intel developed the x86 chip in 1978. To satisfy demands by IBM that Intel would not be the sole supplier of the chips, INTC provided x86 instruction set architecture licensing to AMD.\nConsequently, Intel and AMD have a duopoly position in the PC and server markets, as nearly all computer software is written for x86 architecture. The result is that both have a wide moat related to the x86 ecosystem.\nGaming consoles in particular are based on x86 architecture due to those platforms generally providing more powerful CPUs and GPUs with multiple compute cores. Like PCs, consoles operate with games that use x86 based software. Once again, this stifles potential competition from ARM-based devices.\nUntil fairly recently, AMD was a distant second to INTC as a supplier of x86 chips. However, AMD teamed with Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM)to use that manufacturer’s 7nm process to surpass INTC in process technology. Combined with AMD’s developing new innovative chip designs, this one-two punch resulted in INTC losing significant market share.\nAt the end of Q1, AMD held 19.30% of the x86 desktop market, a 70 basis point gain year-over-year. In Q2 AMD corralled 8% of the server market, up from a 5% market share in Q4 of 2019.\nDespite these setbacks, it seems premature to view Intel as a moribund business. INTC is one of the largest semiconductor companies in the world. The firm dominates the server market, and still holds 60% of the global x86 CPU market.\nThe company has an enormous R&D budget, and it is expanding into new markets, primarily Artificial Intelligence, Field-Programmable Gate Array chips, and automotive offerings, through its acquisitions of Habana Labs, Altera, Movidius, and Mobileye.\nInvestors should not be swayed by the claim that Intel’s new 10nm chips are inferior to 7nm solely on the basis that 7 is superior to 10. While once used to denote the technology level of a chip design, it has been misused to the point of being useless.\nHowever, there are a number of concerns that must be acknowledged. Intel lags competitors in the smartphone market. As consumers shift to mobile devices, this could result in a sustained headwind as smartphones take the place of PCs. On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that INTC’s server processor business has seen growth associated with the surge in mobile devices and cloud computing.\nIntel also faces increased competition from AMD in the data center space, as well as customers developing their own ARM-based chips for CPUs.\nAn Overview of AMD\nIn years past, INTC held the lion’s share of the x86 market. This was due in part to Intel’s leading-edge manufacturing combined with AMD’s wafer supply agreements with less than stellar GlobalFoundries.\nHowever, a seismic shift occurred due to three factors: driven by innovative designs, AMD brought competitive products to market, AMD shifted to TSMC for production, and Intel faced repeated manufacturing delays. The two charts below document the progress the company has made.\nSource:Q2 Earnings Presentation\nSource:Q2 Earnings Presentation\nLike Intel, AMD’s primary products are CPUs and GPUs. AMD’s chips are designed for PCs, game consoles, servers, and blockchain applications. And like INTC, AMD’s offerings are largely protected from competition due to the preponderance of software for PCs and servers being designed for x86 architecture.\nAMD’s strong growth has largely come at the expense of Intel as AMD has steadily chipped away at the former company’s CPU market share.\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nAMD’s focus on CPU and GPU semi-custom processor applications has resulted in their use in Microsoft Xbox and Sony PlayStation game consoles.\nIn regards to PC integrated GPUs, AMD is roughly in parity with NVIDIA while INTC dominates with roughly 68% of the market.\nSource:tom'sHARDWARE\nHowever, NVIDIA dominates the discrete GPU space with an 80% plus market share with AMD sweeping up what is left. NVIDIA’s discrete GPUs are arguably superior to AMD’s (more on that later); therefore, investors should not look for growth here.\nAlthough AMD’s EPYC server CPU products were competitive with that of rivals, initially the company relied on aggressive pricing to promote its first generation of EPYC offerings. However, the EPYC line has gained wider acceptance, and with the Milan processors, the company is gaining market share. As server CPUs provide a better profit margin than the company’s other products, expansion into that space should aid in driving revenue.\nLate last year,AMD entered intoa deal to acquire Xilinx (XLNX), a leader in field programmable gate array (FPGA) chips. FPGAs can be used for a wide variety of applications. Because shifting to a competing FPGA provider requires retraining of engineers in software and design tools, customers are loath to make a switch to a competing vendor. Consequently, if the Xilinx deal goes through, AMD will have acquired a wide moat business. Management guides for operational efficiencies of approximately $300 million within 18 months of closing the transaction.\nThe Xilinx acquisition should bolster AMD’s data center and artificial intelligence businesses.\nAMD agreed to acquire Xilinx for $35 billion in an all-stock transaction.\nA Survey of NVIDIA\nNVDA's focus on the graphics processing units market has led the company to a dominant position in the discrete GPU space. The firm is the leader in discrete GPUs for computing platforms, especially gaming consoles. The fact that Intel licensed intellectual property from NVIDIA to integrate GPUs into its PC chipset testifies to the lead the company maintains.\nThe chart below provides a record of the burgeoning ASP the company has been able to command over the last half decade, beginning with the Pascal architecture in 2016, and progressing through Turing to Ampere.\nSource:AMD Investor Presentation\nThe firm’s chips are also found in many high-end PCs, and NVDA has particular strength in the incipient AI and self-driving vehicle markets.\nGPUs are being teamed with CPUs to enhance computation workloads. This stratagem is designed to bolster the ability of AI systems to perform computationally intensive tasks. AI related to autonomous vehicles is a developing strength for NVIDIA. Another arena in which the firm is making its mark is in cloud\nAI and data centers pose the most likely avenue of growth for NVDA. To strengthen its position in both businesses, the company moved last year to acquire ARM Holdings (ARMHF) from parent company Softbank for $40 billion.\nARM is the globe’s largest licensor of chip designs. Its chips are ubiquitous and can be found in mobile phones, smart TVs, and tablet computers. 160 billion chips have been made using ARM designs.\nPerhaps of equal importance is that 13 million developers work with ARM devices. To place that in context, NVDA has 2 million developers working on its array of devices.\nUnfortunately for investors, bothChinaand theU.K.are reportedly balking at approving the deal.\nHead-To-Head Comparisons\nValuation Metrics\nThe following chart provides a variety of metrics related to each stock's valuation. All data labeled forward is analysts’ next fiscal year consensus estimate.\nSource:Seeking Alpha Premium/ chart by author\nNext, I’m using a graph to provide PEG ratios for the three companies. As there can be fairly wide variations in PEG ratios due to analysts’ inputs, I prefer that readers have access to multiple sources when I find wide variance in the ratio.\nChart by author\nNote that Seeking Alpha provides a three to five-year PEG, Schwab simply lists its metric as a PEG ratio, while Yahoo! Finance calculates a five-year ratio. This could explain some of the variance in the numbers provided.\nPerusing the first chart, it is obvious that NVDA is the most overvalued. It is also interesting to note that in the current P/E and the forward price/cash flow estimates show AMD as valued near the sector median.\nCount me as an investor that places great emphasis on a stocks PEG Ratio. Viewing the second chart, AMD has the best PEG of the three companies. I also note that analysts from each source calculated AMD’s PEG ratio as better than the sector median.\nDo not misinterpret my findings. While INTC has a lower valuation in many respects, when considering other factors, I rate AMD higher overall. In other words, it is not the cheapest valuation but the best valuation, for lack of a better means to articulate my view.\n=Advantage AMD\nAnalysts’ Price Targets\nNVIDIA shares currently trade for $202.95. The average 12-month price target of 33 analysts is $186.49. The average price target of the 17 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $210.53, about 3.7% above the current price of the stock.\nAMD shares currently trade for $107.58. The average 12-month price target of 28 analysts is $108.56. The average price target of the 11 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $117.27, roughly 9% above the prevailing share price.\nIntel shares currently trade for $54.05. The average 12-month price target of 34 analysts is $59.86. The average price target of the 16 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $58.97, a 9% premium over the current share price.\nInvestors should be aware that it has been nearly three months since NVDA posted quarterly earnings while INTC and AMD reported recently.\n=Tie AMD/INTC\nGrowth Rates\nThe next chart provides data for growth rates. Unless otherwise noted, the metrics reflect analysts' average two-year forecasts.\nSource:Seeking Alpha Premium/ Chart by author\nWhile investors familiar with these three companies would expect INTC to perform poorly in relation to NVDA and AMD in regarding growth, in several cases Intel is projected to experience negative growth rates.\nAdvanced Micro Devices projected growth leads that of NVIDIA in every category, and at times by very wide margins.\n=Advantage AMD\nI considered providing a chart outlining the profitability of each company; however, suffice it to say that each is highly profitable, and that a juxtaposition of the three would result in a tie.\nI often provide a comparison that breaks down dividend metrics, but AMD does not pay a dividend, and NVDA has an anemic yield. INTC currently yields about 2.6%. The dividend is well funded.\nDebt Metrics\nNVIDIA had $12.67 billion in cash and $5.96 billion at the end of the last quarter. Should the ARM acquisition meet approval, the deal is structured so that $21 billion of the $40 billion purchase price will be in stock.\nAMD has restructured its debt resulting in reduced interest costs. AMD had about $3.8 billion in cash and $313 million in long-term debt at the end of the most recent quarter.\nIntel's has solid investment-grade credit ratings. The company held nearly $24.86 billion cash at the end of the last quarter and had $31.7 billion long-term debt.\nAll three firms have strong financial positions. Weighing the possibility that NVDA and AMD may add debt due to prospective acquisitions, I am rating the three firms as equals.\nR&D Budgets\nThis is the first time I have compared the R&D budgets of companies for a head-to-head showdown. However, in the semiconductor industry, that can be of pivotal importance.\nLast fiscal year, Intel devoted over $13.5 billion to R&D, NVDA spent nearly $2.83 billion, and AMD budgeted a bit over $1.9 billion on research and development.\nAMD is at a clear disadvantage, and that weakness is magnified because it often competes against INTC and NVDA in different arenas. It should be noted that a portion of Intel’s R&D is funneled to its foundry business. Nevertheless, it is the clear winner here, and AMD is the obvious loser.\nI should add that NVDA is chipping away at AMD’s share of the discrete GPU market, and I believe that trend will continue, in part due to the disparity in R&D budgets.\n=Advantage INTC\nBottom Line: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?\nTo arrive at an answer, much depends on whether NVIDIA can complete its acquisition of ARM.\nBecause ARM processors are more power and cost-efficient than x86 chips, NVDA could gain market share in the data center space. Since around a third of Intel’s revenue flows from data centers, that could represent a headwind for INTC and a positive for NVDA. However, there is a good chance the deal will fail to close.\nThe degree of success Intel finds as its planned foundries come online is another factor that should be weighed.\nA development to be weighed is that AMD has now reached parity with INTC in the PC market in terms of the quality of its products. Furthermore, AMD is gaining market share in the server market, and I expect that trend to continue.\nOn the other hand, AMD is losing share in the discrete GPU market to NVDA. NVDA has a technological lead in that space which will probably continue.\nWhile AMD and NVDA are seen as growth machines, one should not ignore that Intel’s Internet of Things business increased by 47% in the last quarter. Mobileye also saw a surge in growth with revenue increasing 124%. Although these businesses only totaled $1.3 billion in revenue, a fraction of Intel's total revenue of $18.5 billion, they still represent areas of high growth.\nHowever, note the header refers to “chip stock.” Consequently, technological advantages are but one part of the puzzle. Any investment decision must take current valuations and prospective growth rates into account.\nWith that in mind, I must rate NVIDIA as a HOLD due to current valuation and growth estimates. Note my rating is based on the current valuation of the stock. I acknowledge the exemplary leadership of the company and believe the long-term prospect for the stock is excellent.\nI also rate INTC as a HOLD. I previously rated the company as a buy. While I still believe the firm will serve long-term investors well, I now believe its recovery will unfold over a long time span, and better opportunities are available.\nI rate AMD as a BUY. This is based on the current valuations and growth rates outlined in this article. I’ll add that those metrics are buttressed by my perception that as Intel works on its recovery, AMD is likely to chip away at market share.\nFor additional insights into the technological aspects of an investment in AMD and INTC, I recommend an excellent article by SA contributor Keyanoush Razavidinani.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9,"AMD":0.9,"INTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":596,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897795127,"gmtCreate":1628984926269,"gmtModify":1631893546819,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;","listText":"[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[呆住]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;[财迷]&nbsp;","text":"[呆住] [呆住] [呆住] [呆住] [呆住] [财迷] [财迷] [财迷] [财迷] [财迷]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897795127","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1707,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":897795049,"gmtCreate":1628984899181,"gmtModify":1631893546831,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897795049","repostId":"2159321505","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159321505","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1628911811,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2159321505?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-14 11:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla seeks to reduce board members’ terms, make other changes in October shareholder meeting<blockquote>特斯拉寻求缩短董事会成员任期，并在十月股东大会上做出其他改变</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159321505","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Board members would serve for two years rather than three\nTesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. ","content":"<p>Board members would serve for two years rather than three</p><p><blockquote>董事会成员的任期为两年，而不是三年</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abc701f141f0c0044cabe912e510fe2e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Tesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. MAJA HITIJ/GETTY IMAGES</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk去年在德国。玛雅·希蒂吉/盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Tesla Inc. set its shareholder meeting for Oct. 7 at the Fremont, Calif., factory, with a call for reducing its directors’ terms among the proposals the electric-car maker will bring to the table, the company said in filing late Friday.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉公司在周五晚间提交的文件中表示，该公司将于10月7日在加州弗里蒙特工厂举行股东大会，该公司将提出的提案包括缩短董事任期的看涨期权。</blockquote></p><p> One of the proposals calls for each director’s term to be reduced from three years to two years. Tesla’s&nbsp;board currently has nine members who are divided into three classes in staggered three-year terms.</p><p><blockquote>其中一项建议是评级将每名董事的任期从三年减至两年。特斯拉董事会目前有九名成员，分为三类，任期三年。</blockquote></p><p> If the proposal is approved, however, the board will be divided into two classes with staggered two-year terms, with directors distributed as equally between the classes as possible, Tesla said in the&nbsp;filing.</p><p><blockquote>然而，特斯拉在文件中表示，如果该提案获得批准，董事会将分为两个任期交错的类别，董事在两个类别之间的分布尽可能平均。</blockquote></p><p> The board would be reduced to eight members, since Antonio Gracias, a venture capitalist who has served on the Tesla board since 2007, said in 2019 he’d not be seeking reelection when his term ends this year.</p><p><blockquote>自2007年以来一直在特斯拉董事会任职的风险投资家Antonio Gracias在2019年表示，今年任期结束后，他不会寻求连任，董事会成员将减少至8名。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s board nominated current board members James Murdoch, the youngest son of News Corp&nbsp;founder Rupert Murdoch, and Kimbal Musk, Chief Executive Elon Musk’s brother, for re-election as class II directors, with terms expiring in 2024. If the term reduction is approved, then their terms would end in 2023, the company said.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉董事会提名现任董事会成员、新闻集团创始人默多克的小儿子默多克（James Murdoch）和首席执行官马斯克（Elon Musk）的哥哥马斯克（Kimbal Musk）连任二级董事，任期将于2024年届满。该公司表示，如果期限缩减获得批准，那么他们的期限将于2023年结束。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s curtailing board member terms was a response to a shareholder proposal calling to elect each board member for one year.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉缩短董事会成员任期是对股东提议选举每位董事会成员一年的回应。</blockquote></p><p> The two-year term, however, “strikes a suitable balance to the long-term interests of and nearer-term accountability to our stockholders at this time,” Tesla said.</p><p><blockquote>然而，特斯拉表示，两年的任期“在我们股东的长期利益和近期责任之间取得了适当的平衡”。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla shares were flat in after-hours trading after ending the regular trading day down 0.7%. The stock has gained 1.6% this year, compared with gains of around 19% for the S&amp;P 500 index.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价在常规交易日收盘下跌0.7%后，在盘后交易中持平。该股今年已上涨1.6%，而标普500指数的涨幅约为19%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla seeks to reduce board members’ terms, make other changes in October shareholder meeting<blockquote>特斯拉寻求缩短董事会成员任期，并在十月股东大会上做出其他改变</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla seeks to reduce board members’ terms, make other changes in October shareholder meeting<blockquote>特斯拉寻求缩短董事会成员任期，并在十月股东大会上做出其他改变</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-14 11:30</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Board members would serve for two years rather than three</p><p><blockquote>董事会成员的任期为两年，而不是三年</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abc701f141f0c0044cabe912e510fe2e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Tesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. MAJA HITIJ/GETTY IMAGES</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk去年在德国。玛雅·希蒂吉/盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Tesla Inc. set its shareholder meeting for Oct. 7 at the Fremont, Calif., factory, with a call for reducing its directors’ terms among the proposals the electric-car maker will bring to the table, the company said in filing late Friday.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉公司在周五晚间提交的文件中表示，该公司将于10月7日在加州弗里蒙特工厂举行股东大会，该公司将提出的提案包括缩短董事任期的看涨期权。</blockquote></p><p> One of the proposals calls for each director’s term to be reduced from three years to two years. Tesla’s&nbsp;board currently has nine members who are divided into three classes in staggered three-year terms.</p><p><blockquote>其中一项建议是评级将每名董事的任期从三年减至两年。特斯拉董事会目前有九名成员，分为三类，任期三年。</blockquote></p><p> If the proposal is approved, however, the board will be divided into two classes with staggered two-year terms, with directors distributed as equally between the classes as possible, Tesla said in the&nbsp;filing.</p><p><blockquote>然而，特斯拉在文件中表示，如果该提案获得批准，董事会将分为两个任期交错的类别，董事在两个类别之间的分布尽可能平均。</blockquote></p><p> The board would be reduced to eight members, since Antonio Gracias, a venture capitalist who has served on the Tesla board since 2007, said in 2019 he’d not be seeking reelection when his term ends this year.</p><p><blockquote>自2007年以来一直在特斯拉董事会任职的风险投资家Antonio Gracias在2019年表示，今年任期结束后，他不会寻求连任，董事会成员将减少至8名。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s board nominated current board members James Murdoch, the youngest son of News Corp&nbsp;founder Rupert Murdoch, and Kimbal Musk, Chief Executive Elon Musk’s brother, for re-election as class II directors, with terms expiring in 2024. If the term reduction is approved, then their terms would end in 2023, the company said.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉董事会提名现任董事会成员、新闻集团创始人默多克的小儿子默多克（James Murdoch）和首席执行官马斯克（Elon Musk）的哥哥马斯克（Kimbal Musk）连任二级董事，任期将于2024年届满。该公司表示，如果期限缩减获得批准，那么他们的期限将于2023年结束。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s curtailing board member terms was a response to a shareholder proposal calling to elect each board member for one year.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉缩短董事会成员任期是对股东提议选举每位董事会成员一年的回应。</blockquote></p><p> The two-year term, however, “strikes a suitable balance to the long-term interests of and nearer-term accountability to our stockholders at this time,” Tesla said.</p><p><blockquote>然而，特斯拉表示，两年的任期“在我们股东的长期利益和近期责任之间取得了适当的平衡”。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla shares were flat in after-hours trading after ending the regular trading day down 0.7%. The stock has gained 1.6% this year, compared with gains of around 19% for the S&amp;P 500 index.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价在常规交易日收盘下跌0.7%后，在盘后交易中持平。该股今年已上涨1.6%，而标普500指数的涨幅约为19%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tesla-seeks-to-reduce-board-terms-in-october-shareholder-meeting-11628888340?mod=newsviewer_click\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tesla-seeks-to-reduce-board-terms-in-october-shareholder-meeting-11628888340?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159321505","content_text":"Board members would serve for two years rather than three\nTesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. MAJA HITIJ/GETTY IMAGES\nTesla Inc. set its shareholder meeting for Oct. 7 at the Fremont, Calif., factory, with a call for reducing its directors’ terms among the proposals the electric-car maker will bring to the table, the company said in filing late Friday.\nOne of the proposals calls for each director’s term to be reduced from three years to two years. Tesla’s board currently has nine members who are divided into three classes in staggered three-year terms.\nIf the proposal is approved, however, the board will be divided into two classes with staggered two-year terms, with directors distributed as equally between the classes as possible, Tesla said in the filing.\nThe board would be reduced to eight members, since Antonio Gracias, a venture capitalist who has served on the Tesla board since 2007, said in 2019 he’d not be seeking reelection when his term ends this year.\nTesla’s board nominated current board members James Murdoch, the youngest son of News Corp founder Rupert Murdoch, and Kimbal Musk, Chief Executive Elon Musk’s brother, for re-election as class II directors, with terms expiring in 2024. If the term reduction is approved, then their terms would end in 2023, the company said.\nTesla’s curtailing board member terms was a response to a shareholder proposal calling to elect each board member for one year.\nThe two-year term, however, “strikes a suitable balance to the long-term interests of and nearer-term accountability to our stockholders at this time,” Tesla said.\nTesla shares were flat in after-hours trading after ending the regular trading day down 0.7%. The stock has gained 1.6% this year, compared with gains of around 19% for the S&P 500 index.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":720,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":895850895,"gmtCreate":1628734667317,"gmtModify":1631893546829,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/895850895","repostId":"2158228073","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":542,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896919073,"gmtCreate":1628551119192,"gmtModify":1631893546836,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896919073","repostId":"1196813173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":873,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178214333,"gmtCreate":1626823423922,"gmtModify":1633770766175,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/178214333","repostId":"1102026643","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102026643","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626822943,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102026643?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 07:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth<blockquote>Netflix预测增长疲软，详细介绍了视频游戏推广</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102026643","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streami","content":"<p>(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streaming service projected weak subscriber growth amid growing competition and the lifting of pandemic restrictions that had kept people at home.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社）-Netflix公司表示，将更深入地进军视频游戏领域，因为该电影和电视流媒体服务预计，由于竞争日益激烈以及导致人们呆在家里的大流行限制的取消，用户增长疲软。</blockquote></p><p> The company’s shares&nbsp;once&nbsp;fell&nbsp;6%&nbsp;and&nbsp;finally hovered about even at $531.10 in after-hours trading on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价一度下跌6%，最终在周二盘后交易中徘徊在531.10美元左右。</blockquote></p><p> Earnings for April through June came in at $2.97 per share, below the average forecast of $3.16, according to analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>根据Refinitiv调查的分析师的数据，4月至6月的每股收益为2.97美元，低于平均预期的3.16美元。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix is weathering a sharp slowdown in new customers after a boom in 2020 fueled by stay-at-home orders to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. In the United States and Canada, Netflix reported a decline of about 430,000 subscribers in the second quarter.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix在2020年因遏制COVID-19大流行的居家命令而蓬勃发展后，新客户数量急剧放缓。在美国和加拿大，Netflix报告第二季度订阅用户减少了约43万。</blockquote></p><p> The streaming video pioneer said it was in the early stages of expanding its video game offerings, which would be available to subscribers at no extra charge. The company will initially focus primarily on mobile games.</p><p><blockquote>这家流媒体视频先驱表示，它正处于扩大其视频游戏产品的早期阶段，用户可以免费使用这些产品。该公司最初将主要专注于手机游戏。</blockquote></p><p> “We view gaming as another new content category for us, similar to our expansion into original films, animation and unscripted TV,” the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在致股东的季度信中表示：“我们将游戏视为我们的另一个新内容类别，类似于我们向原创电影、动画和无脚本电视的扩张。”</blockquote></p><p> Netflix has dabbled in video games with a few titles linked to hits including “Stranger Things” and “The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance.”</p><p><blockquote>Netflix涉足电子游戏，其中一些游戏与热门游戏相关，包括《怪奇物语》和《黑暗水晶：抵抗时代》。</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts have said the company that dominates streaming video needs to find new ways to jump-start subscriptions after years of rapid expansion. According to eMarketer, Netflix’s share of U.S. revenue from subscription streaming video will shrink to 30.8% by the end of 2021, from nearly 50% in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师表示，经过多年的快速扩张，这家主导流媒体视频的公司需要找到新的方法来启动订阅。根据eMarketer的数据，到2021年底，Netflix在美国订阅流媒体视频收入中的份额将从2018年的近50%缩减至30.8%。</blockquote></p><p> “Netflix delivered another underwhelming quarter as competition in the streaming space heats up,” said Investing.com senior analyst Jesse Cohen. “The absence of any new looming growth catalysts has been one of the main reasons for Netflix’s relatively mild performance this year.”</p><p><blockquote>随着流媒体领域竞争的加剧，Netflix, Inc.又一个令人印象深刻的季度业绩。”Investing.com高级分析师Jesse Cohen表示。“缺乏任何新的迫在眉睫的增长催化剂是Netflix今年表现相对温和的主要原因之一。”</blockquote></p><p> The company projected it would add 3.5 million customers from July through September. Wall Street had expected a forecast of 5.5 million.</p><p><blockquote>该公司预计从7月到9月将增加350万客户。华尔街此前预计为550万。</blockquote></p><p> For the just-ended quarter, Netflix added 1.54 million customers, beating analyst projections of 1.04 million. Total subscribers numbered 209 million at the end of June.</p><p><blockquote>在刚刚结束的季度，Netflix增加了154万客户，超出了分析师预期的104万。截至6月底，用户总数为2.09亿。</blockquote></p><p> A year ago, Netflix picked up 10.1 million subscribers in the second quarter.</p><p><blockquote>一年前，Netflix第二季度订阅用户数量为1010万。</blockquote></p><p> This year, Netflix felt the impact of COVID-19 on TV production, which left the company with a small menu of new titles. At the same time, Walt Disney Co’s Disney+, AT&amp;T Inc’s HBO Max and other services attracted customers, and summer blockbusters returned to movie theaters.</p><p><blockquote>今年，Netflix感受到了COVID-19对电视制作的影响，这给该公司留下了一个很小的新游戏菜单。与此同时，华特迪士尼公司的Disney+、美国电话电报公司公司的HBO Max等服务吸引了顾客，暑期大片重返电影院。</blockquote></p><p> The easing of pandemic safety measures also lured people out of their homes and away from their televisions.</p><p><blockquote>疫情安全措施的放松也吸引了人们走出家门，远离电视。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix promises a heavier lineup in the second half of 2021, including new seasons of “You,” “Money Heist” and “The Witcher.”</p><p><blockquote>Netflix承诺在2021年下半年将推出更强大的阵容，包括新一季的《你》、《金钱大劫案》和《巫师》。</blockquote></p><p> If its subscriber forecast pans out, Netflix will have added more than 54 million subscribers over the past two years, a pace consistent with its annual additions before the COVID-19 pandemic, the company said.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示，如果其用户预测成真，Netflix将在过去两年中增加超过5400万用户，这一速度与COVID-19大流行之前的年度新增用户数量一致。</blockquote></p><p> It also noted that streaming television still accounts for a small portion of overall viewing time and that its service is less mature outside the United States.</p><p><blockquote>它还指出，流媒体电视仍然占总观看时间的一小部分，而且其服务在美国以外还不太成熟。</blockquote></p><p> “We are confident that we have a long runway for growth,” Netflix said in its investor letter.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix, Inc.在投资者信中表示：“我们相信我们的增长道路很长。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth<blockquote>Netflix预测增长疲软，详细介绍了视频游戏推广</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth<blockquote>Netflix预测增长疲软，详细介绍了视频游戏推广</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 07:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streaming service projected weak subscriber growth amid growing competition and the lifting of pandemic restrictions that had kept people at home.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社）-Netflix公司表示，将更深入地进军视频游戏领域，因为该电影和电视流媒体服务预计，由于竞争日益激烈以及导致人们呆在家里的大流行限制的取消，用户增长疲软。</blockquote></p><p> The company’s shares&nbsp;once&nbsp;fell&nbsp;6%&nbsp;and&nbsp;finally hovered about even at $531.10 in after-hours trading on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价一度下跌6%，最终在周二盘后交易中徘徊在531.10美元左右。</blockquote></p><p> Earnings for April through June came in at $2.97 per share, below the average forecast of $3.16, according to analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>根据Refinitiv调查的分析师的数据，4月至6月的每股收益为2.97美元，低于平均预期的3.16美元。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix is weathering a sharp slowdown in new customers after a boom in 2020 fueled by stay-at-home orders to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. In the United States and Canada, Netflix reported a decline of about 430,000 subscribers in the second quarter.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix在2020年因遏制COVID-19大流行的居家命令而蓬勃发展后，新客户数量急剧放缓。在美国和加拿大，Netflix报告第二季度订阅用户减少了约43万。</blockquote></p><p> The streaming video pioneer said it was in the early stages of expanding its video game offerings, which would be available to subscribers at no extra charge. The company will initially focus primarily on mobile games.</p><p><blockquote>这家流媒体视频先驱表示，它正处于扩大其视频游戏产品的早期阶段，用户可以免费使用这些产品。该公司最初将主要专注于手机游戏。</blockquote></p><p> “We view gaming as another new content category for us, similar to our expansion into original films, animation and unscripted TV,” the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>该公司在致股东的季度信中表示：“我们将游戏视为我们的另一个新内容类别，类似于我们向原创电影、动画和无脚本电视的扩张。”</blockquote></p><p> Netflix has dabbled in video games with a few titles linked to hits including “Stranger Things” and “The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance.”</p><p><blockquote>Netflix涉足电子游戏，其中一些游戏与热门游戏相关，包括《怪奇物语》和《黑暗水晶：抵抗时代》。</blockquote></p><p> Some analysts have said the company that dominates streaming video needs to find new ways to jump-start subscriptions after years of rapid expansion. According to eMarketer, Netflix’s share of U.S. revenue from subscription streaming video will shrink to 30.8% by the end of 2021, from nearly 50% in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>一些分析师表示，经过多年的快速扩张，这家主导流媒体视频的公司需要找到新的方法来启动订阅。根据eMarketer的数据，到2021年底，Netflix在美国订阅流媒体视频收入中的份额将从2018年的近50%缩减至30.8%。</blockquote></p><p> “Netflix delivered another underwhelming quarter as competition in the streaming space heats up,” said Investing.com senior analyst Jesse Cohen. “The absence of any new looming growth catalysts has been one of the main reasons for Netflix’s relatively mild performance this year.”</p><p><blockquote>随着流媒体领域竞争的加剧，Netflix, Inc.又一个令人印象深刻的季度业绩。”Investing.com高级分析师Jesse Cohen表示。“缺乏任何新的迫在眉睫的增长催化剂是Netflix今年表现相对温和的主要原因之一。”</blockquote></p><p> The company projected it would add 3.5 million customers from July through September. Wall Street had expected a forecast of 5.5 million.</p><p><blockquote>该公司预计从7月到9月将增加350万客户。华尔街此前预计为550万。</blockquote></p><p> For the just-ended quarter, Netflix added 1.54 million customers, beating analyst projections of 1.04 million. Total subscribers numbered 209 million at the end of June.</p><p><blockquote>在刚刚结束的季度，Netflix增加了154万客户，超出了分析师预期的104万。截至6月底，用户总数为2.09亿。</blockquote></p><p> A year ago, Netflix picked up 10.1 million subscribers in the second quarter.</p><p><blockquote>一年前，Netflix第二季度订阅用户数量为1010万。</blockquote></p><p> This year, Netflix felt the impact of COVID-19 on TV production, which left the company with a small menu of new titles. At the same time, Walt Disney Co’s Disney+, AT&amp;T Inc’s HBO Max and other services attracted customers, and summer blockbusters returned to movie theaters.</p><p><blockquote>今年，Netflix感受到了COVID-19对电视制作的影响，这给该公司留下了一个很小的新游戏菜单。与此同时，华特迪士尼公司的Disney+、美国电话电报公司公司的HBO Max等服务吸引了顾客，暑期大片重返电影院。</blockquote></p><p> The easing of pandemic safety measures also lured people out of their homes and away from their televisions.</p><p><blockquote>疫情安全措施的放松也吸引了人们走出家门，远离电视。</blockquote></p><p> Netflix promises a heavier lineup in the second half of 2021, including new seasons of “You,” “Money Heist” and “The Witcher.”</p><p><blockquote>Netflix承诺在2021年下半年将推出更强大的阵容，包括新一季的《你》、《金钱大劫案》和《巫师》。</blockquote></p><p> If its subscriber forecast pans out, Netflix will have added more than 54 million subscribers over the past two years, a pace consistent with its annual additions before the COVID-19 pandemic, the company said.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示，如果其用户预测成真，Netflix将在过去两年中增加超过5400万用户，这一速度与COVID-19大流行之前的年度新增用户数量一致。</blockquote></p><p> It also noted that streaming television still accounts for a small portion of overall viewing time and that its service is less mature outside the United States.</p><p><blockquote>它还指出，流媒体电视仍然占总观看时间的一小部分，而且其服务在美国以外还不太成熟。</blockquote></p><p> “We are confident that we have a long runway for growth,” Netflix said in its investor letter.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix, Inc.在投资者信中表示：“我们相信我们的增长道路很长。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/netflix-results/update-4-netflix-details-video-game-push-as-it-forecasts-weak-growth-idUSL1N2OW2GQ\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/netflix-results/update-4-netflix-details-video-game-push-as-it-forecasts-weak-growth-idUSL1N2OW2GQ","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102026643","content_text":"(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streaming service projected weak subscriber growth amid growing competition and the lifting of pandemic restrictions that had kept people at home.\nThe company’s shares once fell 6% and finally hovered about even at $531.10 in after-hours trading on Tuesday.\nEarnings for April through June came in at $2.97 per share, below the average forecast of $3.16, according to analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.\nNetflix is weathering a sharp slowdown in new customers after a boom in 2020 fueled by stay-at-home orders to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. In the United States and Canada, Netflix reported a decline of about 430,000 subscribers in the second quarter.\nThe streaming video pioneer said it was in the early stages of expanding its video game offerings, which would be available to subscribers at no extra charge. The company will initially focus primarily on mobile games.\n“We view gaming as another new content category for us, similar to our expansion into original films, animation and unscripted TV,” the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.\nNetflix has dabbled in video games with a few titles linked to hits including “Stranger Things” and “The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance.”\nSome analysts have said the company that dominates streaming video needs to find new ways to jump-start subscriptions after years of rapid expansion. According to eMarketer, Netflix’s share of U.S. revenue from subscription streaming video will shrink to 30.8% by the end of 2021, from nearly 50% in 2018.\n“Netflix delivered another underwhelming quarter as competition in the streaming space heats up,” said Investing.com senior analyst Jesse Cohen. “The absence of any new looming growth catalysts has been one of the main reasons for Netflix’s relatively mild performance this year.”\nThe company projected it would add 3.5 million customers from July through September. Wall Street had expected a forecast of 5.5 million.\nFor the just-ended quarter, Netflix added 1.54 million customers, beating analyst projections of 1.04 million. Total subscribers numbered 209 million at the end of June.\nA year ago, Netflix picked up 10.1 million subscribers in the second quarter.\nThis year, Netflix felt the impact of COVID-19 on TV production, which left the company with a small menu of new titles. At the same time, Walt Disney Co’s Disney+, AT&T Inc’s HBO Max and other services attracted customers, and summer blockbusters returned to movie theaters.\nThe easing of pandemic safety measures also lured people out of their homes and away from their televisions.\nNetflix promises a heavier lineup in the second half of 2021, including new seasons of “You,” “Money Heist” and “The Witcher.”\nIf its subscriber forecast pans out, Netflix will have added more than 54 million subscribers over the past two years, a pace consistent with its annual additions before the COVID-19 pandemic, the company said.\nIt also noted that streaming television still accounts for a small portion of overall viewing time and that its service is less mature outside the United States.\n“We are confident that we have a long runway for growth,” Netflix said in its investor letter.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":450,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143833546,"gmtCreate":1625786912985,"gmtModify":1633937430912,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/143833546","repostId":"1195657546","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":619,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":195575870,"gmtCreate":1621304635190,"gmtModify":1634192600253,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like this","listText":"Like this","text":"Like this","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/195575870","repostId":"2136295438","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":543,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154663036,"gmtCreate":1625525601625,"gmtModify":1633940097686,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like and comment. Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like and comment. Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like and comment. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/154663036","repostId":"1133670347","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":811,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":101237458,"gmtCreate":1619915738474,"gmtModify":1634209195211,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like this please","listText":"Like this please","text":"Like this please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/101237458","repostId":"1105099718","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105099718","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619897946,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1105099718?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-02 03:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105099718","media":"WSJ","summary":"Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate. Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’sBerkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK.B-0.95%. California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive. While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are","content":"<p>Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate</p><p><blockquote>机构股东正在敦促这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团在气候和治理方面进行变革</blockquote></p><p>Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’s<u>Berkshire Hathaway</u>&nbsp;Inc.BRK.B -0.95%</p><p><blockquote>专业基金经理正在加大对沃伦·巴菲特的压力<u>伯克希尔哈撒韦</u>公司BRK.B-0.95%</blockquote></p><p>California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dd969e4b237144cd02112f41464d169\" tg-width=\"824\" tg-height=\"1396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote>加州公共雇员退休系统和路博迈要求这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团引入新董事，并提供更多有关气候风险和高管的信息</blockquote></p><p>Leading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis &amp; Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.</p><p><blockquote>在周六伯克希尔年会之前，代理顾问Glass Lewis&amp;Co.和Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.建议投资者保留对董事会成员的投票。</blockquote></p><p>While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.</p><p><blockquote>尽管许多投诉并不新鲜，股东提案也不太可能获得通过，但在投资者对企业可持续发展问题的兴趣日益浓厚的情况下，伯克希尔近年来低迷的回报使其更容易受到批评。</blockquote></p><p>The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging as<u>a key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money</u>.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，股东就气候变化、社会进步和治理问题向公司施压的运动继续升温，<u>基金经理努力留住客户资金的一个关键卖点</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,<u>the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020</u>, outperforming the S&amp;P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.</p><p><blockquote>在巴菲特先生的领导下，<u>该公司拥有1965年至2020年20%的复合年化收益</u>，跑赢标普500期内含股息10.2%的涨幅。伯克希尔过去三年和五年的总回报率分别为12%和14%，而该指数的总回报率为19%和18%。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers公司治理主管Simiso Nzima表示：“伯克希尔获得通过的部分原因是其历史上强劲的财务业绩。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built up<u>a diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades</u>, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司继续强调其对长期发展的持续关注。巴菲特先生是该公司的首席执行官兼董事长，他建立了<u>主要由美国企业和投资组成的多元化投资组合，预计将持续数十年</u>，而不是与由蓬勃发展的科技股提振的波动市场竞争。</blockquote></p><p>Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>拥有4440亿美元资产的美国最大公共养老基金Calpers共同发起了一项股东提案，恳求伯克希尔提供更多有关气候相关风险和机遇的信息。</blockquote></p><p>The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.</p><p><blockquote>该养老基金还拒绝投票连任董事会审计和治理委员会成员，理由是未能满足股东对气候风险披露的要求。该公司表示，担心董事会缺乏新成员，不与股东接触，也不让投资者对高管薪酬计划进行投票。</blockquote></p><p>“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果不更新董事会，下一代董事就无法在长期任职的董事离开董事会之前向他们学习，”恩齐马先生说。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔拒绝在公司周六会议前发表评论。</blockquote></p><p>Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.</p><p><blockquote>拥有超过4290亿美元资产的私人基金管理公司Neuberger也表示，将投票支持几项与环境、社会和公司治理问题（通常缩写为ESG）相关的股东主导的提案。</blockquote></p><p>“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”</p><p><blockquote>跟踪该公司的路博迈分析师米歇尔·佐丹奴(Michelle Giordano)表示：“人们可能会认为，如果公司有责任保护环境或在社会问题和治理方面提供良好服务，那么伯克希尔可能会成为这些领域的领导者。”“但好像不是。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage&nbsp;climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already produces<u>a sustainability report</u>.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔在其年度委托书中表示，虽然它同意公司有责任管理气候风险，但它更愿意让其各个运营部门致力于自己的环境政策。该公司写道，小型公司办公室的授权将侵犯帮助这些企业在伯克希尔旗下蓬勃发展的自主权。例如，伯克希尔哈撒韦能源公司已经生产<u>可持续发展报告</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers还承诺支持一项提案，要求该公司报告其员工多元化的努力。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔表示，多元化报告提案不恰当地暗示“伯克希尔60多家运营业务中的每一家都有一种标准化技术来解决多元化、公平性和包容性问题。”</blockquote></p><p>“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔写道：“为了比较不同地理位置的此类不同业务而要求统一的定量报告是不合理的。”</blockquote></p><p>Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis和ISS建议股东投票支持ESG提案，并对某些董事弃权。</blockquote></p><p>“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis ESG研究高级总监Courteney Keatinge表示：“今年主流投资者对ESG问题给予了更多关注。”</blockquote></p><p>Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.</p><p><blockquote>另一个因素在起作用：伯克希尔的股票正在慢慢易手。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.</p><p><blockquote>乔治华盛顿大学法学教授劳伦斯·坎宁安(Lawrence Cunningham)撰写了大量有关该公司的文章，他表示，随着时间的推移，巴菲特减持该公司股份的长期计划已将更多伯克希尔股票转移到大型机构投资者手中。</blockquote></p><p>About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示，伯克希尔约70%的股票由个人持有，其中许多人是忠于巴菲特的长期持有者。许多人并不关心伯克希尔是否缺乏企业可持续发展报告或随时准备回答他们问题的投资者关系团队。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”</p><p><blockquote>巴菲特在最近致股东的信中写道：“伯克希尔不同寻常且有价值的个人股东家族可能会加深您对我们不愿讨好华尔街分析师和机构投资者的理解。”“我们已经拥有了我们想要的投资者，总的来说，我认为他们不会通过替代者来升级。”</blockquote></p><p>The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters.&nbsp;When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>不过，机构持股比例的逐步上升可能已经让职业经理人有能力在治理问题上向伯克希尔施压。坎宁安说，当巴菲特和他的遗产出售剩余股份时，这些基金经理很可能会持有该公司更多的股份。</blockquote></p><p>“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示：“重大领导力和结构性变革将会出现，这些持有者正在为这场战斗做准备。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">WSJ</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-02 03:39</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate</p><p><blockquote>机构股东正在敦促这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团在气候和治理方面进行变革</blockquote></p><p>Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’s<u>Berkshire Hathaway</u>&nbsp;Inc.BRK.B -0.95%</p><p><blockquote>专业基金经理正在加大对沃伦·巴菲特的压力<u>伯克希尔哈撒韦</u>公司BRK.B-0.95%</blockquote></p><p>California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dd969e4b237144cd02112f41464d169\" tg-width=\"824\" tg-height=\"1396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote>加州公共雇员退休系统和路博迈要求这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团引入新董事，并提供更多有关气候风险和高管的信息</blockquote></p><p>Leading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis &amp; Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.</p><p><blockquote>在周六伯克希尔年会之前，代理顾问Glass Lewis&amp;Co.和Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.建议投资者保留对董事会成员的投票。</blockquote></p><p>While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.</p><p><blockquote>尽管许多投诉并不新鲜，股东提案也不太可能获得通过，但在投资者对企业可持续发展问题的兴趣日益浓厚的情况下，伯克希尔近年来低迷的回报使其更容易受到批评。</blockquote></p><p>The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging as<u>a key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money</u>.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，股东就气候变化、社会进步和治理问题向公司施压的运动继续升温，<u>基金经理努力留住客户资金的一个关键卖点</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,<u>the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020</u>, outperforming the S&amp;P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.</p><p><blockquote>在巴菲特先生的领导下，<u>该公司拥有1965年至2020年20%的复合年化收益</u>，跑赢标普500期内含股息10.2%的涨幅。伯克希尔过去三年和五年的总回报率分别为12%和14%，而该指数的总回报率为19%和18%。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers公司治理主管Simiso Nzima表示：“伯克希尔获得通过的部分原因是其历史上强劲的财务业绩。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built up<u>a diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades</u>, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司继续强调其对长期发展的持续关注。巴菲特先生是该公司的首席执行官兼董事长，他建立了<u>主要由美国企业和投资组成的多元化投资组合，预计将持续数十年</u>，而不是与由蓬勃发展的科技股提振的波动市场竞争。</blockquote></p><p>Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>拥有4440亿美元资产的美国最大公共养老基金Calpers共同发起了一项股东提案，恳求伯克希尔提供更多有关气候相关风险和机遇的信息。</blockquote></p><p>The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.</p><p><blockquote>该养老基金还拒绝投票连任董事会审计和治理委员会成员，理由是未能满足股东对气候风险披露的要求。该公司表示，担心董事会缺乏新成员，不与股东接触，也不让投资者对高管薪酬计划进行投票。</blockquote></p><p>“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果不更新董事会，下一代董事就无法在长期任职的董事离开董事会之前向他们学习，”恩齐马先生说。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔拒绝在公司周六会议前发表评论。</blockquote></p><p>Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.</p><p><blockquote>拥有超过4290亿美元资产的私人基金管理公司Neuberger也表示，将投票支持几项与环境、社会和公司治理问题（通常缩写为ESG）相关的股东主导的提案。</blockquote></p><p>“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”</p><p><blockquote>跟踪该公司的路博迈分析师米歇尔·佐丹奴(Michelle Giordano)表示：“人们可能会认为，如果公司有责任保护环境或在社会问题和治理方面提供良好服务，那么伯克希尔可能会成为这些领域的领导者。”“但好像不是。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage&nbsp;climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already produces<u>a sustainability report</u>.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔在其年度委托书中表示，虽然它同意公司有责任管理气候风险，但它更愿意让其各个运营部门致力于自己的环境政策。该公司写道，小型公司办公室的授权将侵犯帮助这些企业在伯克希尔旗下蓬勃发展的自主权。例如，伯克希尔哈撒韦能源公司已经生产<u>可持续发展报告</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers还承诺支持一项提案，要求该公司报告其员工多元化的努力。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔表示，多元化报告提案不恰当地暗示“伯克希尔60多家运营业务中的每一家都有一种标准化技术来解决多元化、公平性和包容性问题。”</blockquote></p><p>“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔写道：“为了比较不同地理位置的此类不同业务而要求统一的定量报告是不合理的。”</blockquote></p><p>Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis和ISS建议股东投票支持ESG提案，并对某些董事弃权。</blockquote></p><p>“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis ESG研究高级总监Courteney Keatinge表示：“今年主流投资者对ESG问题给予了更多关注。”</blockquote></p><p>Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.</p><p><blockquote>另一个因素在起作用：伯克希尔的股票正在慢慢易手。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.</p><p><blockquote>乔治华盛顿大学法学教授劳伦斯·坎宁安(Lawrence Cunningham)撰写了大量有关该公司的文章，他表示，随着时间的推移，巴菲特减持该公司股份的长期计划已将更多伯克希尔股票转移到大型机构投资者手中。</blockquote></p><p>About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示，伯克希尔约70%的股票由个人持有，其中许多人是忠于巴菲特的长期持有者。许多人并不关心伯克希尔是否缺乏企业可持续发展报告或随时准备回答他们问题的投资者关系团队。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”</p><p><blockquote>巴菲特在最近致股东的信中写道：“伯克希尔不同寻常且有价值的个人股东家族可能会加深您对我们不愿讨好华尔街分析师和机构投资者的理解。”“我们已经拥有了我们想要的投资者，总的来说，我认为他们不会通过替代者来升级。”</blockquote></p><p>The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters.&nbsp;When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>不过，机构持股比例的逐步上升可能已经让职业经理人有能力在治理问题上向伯克希尔施压。坎宁安说，当巴菲特和他的遗产出售剩余股份时，这些基金经理很可能会持有该公司更多的股份。</blockquote></p><p>“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示：“重大领导力和结构性变革将会出现，这些持有者正在为这场战斗做准备。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/warren-buffett-faces-impatient-investors-as-berkshire-hathaway-returns-decline-11619794480\">WSJ</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/daaa666333c3b9bf0b940ffed4c1c369","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/warren-buffett-faces-impatient-investors-as-berkshire-hathaway-returns-decline-11619794480","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105099718","content_text":"Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerateProfessional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’sBerkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK.B -0.95%California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executiveLeading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging asa key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money.Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020, outperforming the S&P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built upa diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already producesa sustainability report.Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters. When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BRK.B":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":828,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":197500081,"gmtCreate":1621471566143,"gmtModify":1634188920003,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like this please [Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"Like this please [Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"Like this please [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/197500081","repostId":"1129952039","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129952039","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621466041,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1129952039?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-20 07:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. stocks drop after Fed minutes, crypto fall<blockquote>美联储会议纪要后美国股市下跌，加密货币下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129952039","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Wall Street’s main indexes closed lower on Wednesday after minutes from an April Federal","content":"<p>(Reuters) - Wall Street’s main indexes closed lower on Wednesday after minutes from an April Federal Reserve meeting showed participants agreed the U.S. economy remained far from the central bank’s goals, with some considering discussions on tapering its bond buying program.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社）-华尔街主要股指周三收低，此前美联储4月份会议纪要显示，与会者一致认为美国经济仍远未达到央行的目标，一些人正在考虑讨论缩减债券购买计划。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 added to losses after the release of the minutes revealed a number of Fed policymakers thought that if the economy continued rapid progress, it would become appropriate “at some point” in upcoming meetings to begin discussing a tapering of the Fed’s monthly purchases of government bonds, a policy designed to keep long-term interest rates low.</p><p><blockquote>在会议纪要发布后，标普500加剧了损失，一些美联储政策制定者认为，如果经济继续快速增长，在即将举行的会议上“在某个时候”开始讨论美联储每月购买国债的规模将变得适当，这是一项旨在保持长期利率较低的政策。</blockquote></p><p>“There continues to be a view and a perspective from the participants, as well as the Fed staff that these inflationary pressures that are beginning to become evident will remain transitory in their view and will likely recede as we transition into 2022,” said Bill Northey, senior investment director at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis.</p><p><blockquote>比尔·诺西(Bill Northey)表示：“参与者以及美联储工作人员仍然认为，这些开始变得明显的通胀压力在他们看来仍将是暂时的，并且可能会随着我们过渡到2022年而消退。”明尼阿波利斯合众银行财富管理公司高级投资总监。</blockquote></p><p>Strong inflation readings and signs of a worker shortage in recent weeks have fueled fears and roiled stock markets despite reassurances from Fed officials that the rise in prices would be temporary.</p><p><blockquote>尽管美联储官员保证价格上涨将是暂时的，但最近几周强劲的通胀数据和工人短缺的迹象加剧了人们的担忧并扰乱了股市。</blockquote></p><p>All three main indexes hit their session lows in morning trade after opening sharply lower, then partially recovered before the release of the Fed minutes pressured them anew.</p><p><blockquote>三大主要股指在早盘大幅低开后均触及盘中低点，随后在美联储会议纪要发布再次给其带来压力之前部分回升。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 164.62 points, or 0.48%, to 33,896.04, the S&amp;P 500 lost 12.15 points, or 0.29%, to 4,115.68 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 3.90 points, or 0.03%, to 13,299.74.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌164.62点，跌幅0.48%，至33,896.04点；标普500下跌12.15点，跌幅0.29%，至4,115.68点；纳斯达克综合指数下跌3.90点，跌幅0.03%，至13,299.74点。</blockquote></p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.70 billion shares, compared with the 10.60 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为107亿股，而过去20个交易日全交易日平均成交量为106亿股。</blockquote></p><p>Contributing to a risk-off mood on Wednesday, Bitcoin and ether plunged in the wake of China’s move to ban financial and payment institutions from providing cryptocurrency services.</p><p><blockquote>在中国禁止金融和支付机构提供加密货币服务后，比特币和以太币暴跌，加剧了周三的避险情绪。</blockquote></p><p>The two main digital currencies fell as much as 30% and 45%, respectively, but they significantly stemmed their losses in afternoon trading after two of their biggest backers -- Tesla Inc chief Elon Musk and Ark Invest’s chief executive officer Cathie Wood -- reiterated their support for bitcoin.</p><p><blockquote>这两种主要数字货币分别下跌了30%和45%，但在它们的两个最大支持者——特斯拉公司首席执行官Elon Musk和Ark Invest首席执行官Cathie Wood——之后，它们在下午交易中大幅止住了跌幅。重申了对比特币的支持。</blockquote></p><p>Crypto-exchange operator Coinbase Global ,miners Riot Blockchain and Marathon Digital Holdings saw their shares sharply decline on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>加密货币交易所运营商Coinbase Global、矿商Riot Blockchain和Marathon Digital Holdings的股价周三大幅下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.15-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.71-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所下跌股与上涨股的比例为2.15比1；在纳斯达克，1.71比1的比率有利于下跌股。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 3 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 34 new highs and 49 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下3个52周新高，无新低；纳斯达克综合指数录得34个新高和49个新低。</blockquote></p><p><b><i>Financial</i></b><b>&nbsp;</b><b><i>Report</i></b></p><p><blockquote><b><i>金融的</i></b><b> </b><b><i>报告</i></b></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1160173685\" target=\"_blank\">4.5 Billion Parcels Expanded Market Share to 20.4%</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1160173685\" target=\"_blank\">45亿件包裹市场份额扩大至20.4%</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1178296022\" target=\"_blank\">KE Holdings EPS beats by $0.04, beats on revenue</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1178296022\" target=\"_blank\">KE Holdings EPS超过预期0.04美元，营收超过预期</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136465859\" target=\"_blank\">Victoria's Secret parent L Brands swings to quarterly profit as sales rise</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136465859\" target=\"_blank\">随着销售额增长，维多利亚的秘密母公司L Brands实现季度盈利</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136594667\" target=\"_blank\">Cisco stock drops as higher costs amid chip shortage ding earnings outlook</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136594667\" target=\"_blank\">芯片短缺导致成本上升影响盈利前景，思科股价下跌</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136450339\" target=\"_blank\">Chip Design Software Firm Synopsys Trounces Fiscal Second-Quarter Targets</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136450339\" target=\"_blank\">芯片设计软件公司Synopsys超额完成第二财季目标</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. stocks drop after Fed minutes, crypto fall<blockquote>美联储会议纪要后美国股市下跌，加密货币下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. stocks drop after Fed minutes, crypto fall<blockquote>美联储会议纪要后美国股市下跌，加密货币下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-20 07:14</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) - Wall Street’s main indexes closed lower on Wednesday after minutes from an April Federal Reserve meeting showed participants agreed the U.S. economy remained far from the central bank’s goals, with some considering discussions on tapering its bond buying program.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社）-华尔街主要股指周三收低，此前美联储4月份会议纪要显示，与会者一致认为美国经济仍远未达到央行的目标，一些人正在考虑讨论缩减债券购买计划。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 added to losses after the release of the minutes revealed a number of Fed policymakers thought that if the economy continued rapid progress, it would become appropriate “at some point” in upcoming meetings to begin discussing a tapering of the Fed’s monthly purchases of government bonds, a policy designed to keep long-term interest rates low.</p><p><blockquote>在会议纪要发布后，标普500加剧了损失，一些美联储政策制定者认为，如果经济继续快速增长，在即将举行的会议上“在某个时候”开始讨论美联储每月购买国债的规模将变得适当，这是一项旨在保持长期利率较低的政策。</blockquote></p><p>“There continues to be a view and a perspective from the participants, as well as the Fed staff that these inflationary pressures that are beginning to become evident will remain transitory in their view and will likely recede as we transition into 2022,” said Bill Northey, senior investment director at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis.</p><p><blockquote>比尔·诺西(Bill Northey)表示：“参与者以及美联储工作人员仍然认为，这些开始变得明显的通胀压力在他们看来仍将是暂时的，并且可能会随着我们过渡到2022年而消退。”明尼阿波利斯合众银行财富管理公司高级投资总监。</blockquote></p><p>Strong inflation readings and signs of a worker shortage in recent weeks have fueled fears and roiled stock markets despite reassurances from Fed officials that the rise in prices would be temporary.</p><p><blockquote>尽管美联储官员保证价格上涨将是暂时的，但最近几周强劲的通胀数据和工人短缺的迹象加剧了人们的担忧并扰乱了股市。</blockquote></p><p>All three main indexes hit their session lows in morning trade after opening sharply lower, then partially recovered before the release of the Fed minutes pressured them anew.</p><p><blockquote>三大主要股指在早盘大幅低开后均触及盘中低点，随后在美联储会议纪要发布再次给其带来压力之前部分回升。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 164.62 points, or 0.48%, to 33,896.04, the S&amp;P 500 lost 12.15 points, or 0.29%, to 4,115.68 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 3.90 points, or 0.03%, to 13,299.74.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌164.62点，跌幅0.48%，至33,896.04点；标普500下跌12.15点，跌幅0.29%，至4,115.68点；纳斯达克综合指数下跌3.90点，跌幅0.03%，至13,299.74点。</blockquote></p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.70 billion shares, compared with the 10.60 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为107亿股，而过去20个交易日全交易日平均成交量为106亿股。</blockquote></p><p>Contributing to a risk-off mood on Wednesday, Bitcoin and ether plunged in the wake of China’s move to ban financial and payment institutions from providing cryptocurrency services.</p><p><blockquote>在中国禁止金融和支付机构提供加密货币服务后，比特币和以太币暴跌，加剧了周三的避险情绪。</blockquote></p><p>The two main digital currencies fell as much as 30% and 45%, respectively, but they significantly stemmed their losses in afternoon trading after two of their biggest backers -- Tesla Inc chief Elon Musk and Ark Invest’s chief executive officer Cathie Wood -- reiterated their support for bitcoin.</p><p><blockquote>这两种主要数字货币分别下跌了30%和45%，但在它们的两个最大支持者——特斯拉公司首席执行官Elon Musk和Ark Invest首席执行官Cathie Wood——之后，它们在下午交易中大幅止住了跌幅。重申了对比特币的支持。</blockquote></p><p>Crypto-exchange operator Coinbase Global ,miners Riot Blockchain and Marathon Digital Holdings saw their shares sharply decline on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>加密货币交易所运营商Coinbase Global、矿商Riot Blockchain和Marathon Digital Holdings的股价周三大幅下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.15-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.71-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所下跌股与上涨股的比例为2.15比1；在纳斯达克，1.71比1的比率有利于下跌股。</blockquote></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 3 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 34 new highs and 49 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下3个52周新高，无新低；纳斯达克综合指数录得34个新高和49个新低。</blockquote></p><p><b><i>Financial</i></b><b>&nbsp;</b><b><i>Report</i></b></p><p><blockquote><b><i>金融的</i></b><b> </b><b><i>报告</i></b></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1160173685\" target=\"_blank\">4.5 Billion Parcels Expanded Market Share to 20.4%</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1160173685\" target=\"_blank\">45亿件包裹市场份额扩大至20.4%</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1178296022\" target=\"_blank\">KE Holdings EPS beats by $0.04, beats on revenue</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1178296022\" target=\"_blank\">KE Holdings EPS超过预期0.04美元，营收超过预期</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136465859\" target=\"_blank\">Victoria's Secret parent L Brands swings to quarterly profit as sales rise</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136465859\" target=\"_blank\">随着销售额增长，维多利亚的秘密母公司L Brands实现季度盈利</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136594667\" target=\"_blank\">Cisco stock drops as higher costs amid chip shortage ding earnings outlook</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136594667\" target=\"_blank\">芯片短缺导致成本上升影响盈利前景，思科股价下跌</a></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136450339\" target=\"_blank\">Chip Design Software Firm Synopsys Trounces Fiscal Second-Quarter Targets</a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2136450339\" target=\"_blank\">芯片设计软件公司Synopsys超额完成第二财季目标</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-u-s-stocks-drop-after-fed-minutes-crypto-fall-idUSL2N2N639Y\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-u-s-stocks-drop-after-fed-minutes-crypto-fall-idUSL2N2N639Y","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129952039","content_text":"(Reuters) - Wall Street’s main indexes closed lower on Wednesday after minutes from an April Federal Reserve meeting showed participants agreed the U.S. economy remained far from the central bank’s goals, with some considering discussions on tapering its bond buying program.The S&P 500 added to losses after the release of the minutes revealed a number of Fed policymakers thought that if the economy continued rapid progress, it would become appropriate “at some point” in upcoming meetings to begin discussing a tapering of the Fed’s monthly purchases of government bonds, a policy designed to keep long-term interest rates low.“There continues to be a view and a perspective from the participants, as well as the Fed staff that these inflationary pressures that are beginning to become evident will remain transitory in their view and will likely recede as we transition into 2022,” said Bill Northey, senior investment director at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis.Strong inflation readings and signs of a worker shortage in recent weeks have fueled fears and roiled stock markets despite reassurances from Fed officials that the rise in prices would be temporary.All three main indexes hit their session lows in morning trade after opening sharply lower, then partially recovered before the release of the Fed minutes pressured them anew.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 164.62 points, or 0.48%, to 33,896.04, the S&P 500 lost 12.15 points, or 0.29%, to 4,115.68 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 3.90 points, or 0.03%, to 13,299.74.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.70 billion shares, compared with the 10.60 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Contributing to a risk-off mood on Wednesday, Bitcoin and ether plunged in the wake of China’s move to ban financial and payment institutions from providing cryptocurrency services.The two main digital currencies fell as much as 30% and 45%, respectively, but they significantly stemmed their losses in afternoon trading after two of their biggest backers -- Tesla Inc chief Elon Musk and Ark Invest’s chief executive officer Cathie Wood -- reiterated their support for bitcoin.Crypto-exchange operator Coinbase Global ,miners Riot Blockchain and Marathon Digital Holdings saw their shares sharply decline on Wednesday.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.15-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.71-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 3 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 34 new highs and 49 new lows.Financial Report4.5 Billion Parcels Expanded Market Share to 20.4%KE Holdings EPS beats by $0.04, beats on revenueVictoria's Secret parent L Brands swings to quarterly profit as sales riseCisco stock drops as higher costs amid chip shortage ding earnings outlookChip Design Software Firm Synopsys Trounces Fiscal Second-Quarter Targets","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":279,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151238081,"gmtCreate":1625093912043,"gmtModify":1633944994359,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like this and comment. Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Please like this and comment. Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Please like this and comment. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/151238081","repostId":"1105779613","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":378,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191497828,"gmtCreate":1620896736464,"gmtModify":1634195480410,"author":{"id":"3577137894024224","authorId":"3577137894024224","name":"LIAN230221","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e67ec99c7595bec06dd19e19f03d461","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577137894024224","idStr":"3577137894024224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like this&nbsp;","listText":"Like this&nbsp;","text":"Like this","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/191497828","repostId":"1134419676","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134419676","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620892887,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1134419676?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-13 16:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Inflation Will Kill This Stock Market<blockquote>通货膨胀会扼杀这个股市</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134419676","media":"zerohedge","summary":"I’m not saying nothing else can do the job before inflation fully gets here, just that the kind of i","content":"<p>I’m not saying nothing else can do the job before inflation fully gets here, just that the kind of inflation I’ve been writing about certainly will do it if nothing else does. That’s what terrifies the market and for a very good reason that may not be the first one that comes to some investors’ minds.</p><p><blockquote>我并不是说在通货膨胀完全到来之前，其他任何东西都无法完成这项工作，只是说如果没有其他东西，我所写的那种通货膨胀肯定会完成这项工作。这就是市场的恐惧，而且有一个很好的理由，这可能不是一些投资者首先想到的。</blockquote></p><p>Many talk about the “risk premium” of investing in stocks. As inflation rises, bond yields rise to offset what will be lost to inflation. As bond yields rise, stocks become less competitive.</p><p><blockquote>许多人谈论投资股票的“风险溢价”。随着通胀上升，债券收益率上升，以抵消通胀造成的损失。随着债券收益率上升，股票竞争力下降。</blockquote></p><p>That’s a problem, but it’s not the big problem. Not this time.</p><p><blockquote>这是个问题，但不是大问题。这次不行。</blockquote></p><p>The big&nbsp;problem is that we all know where the money for stocks is coming from — the Federal reserve and the US government by borrowing and distributing the money the Fed prints. So, the big problem is the Fed.</p><p><blockquote>最大的问题是，我们都知道购买股票的资金来自哪里——美联储和美国政府通过借入和分配美联储印刷的资金。所以，最大的问题是美联储。</blockquote></p><p><b>Fed is getting tangled in a mess of its own making</b></p><p><blockquote><b>美联储正陷入自己造成的混乱之中</b></blockquote></p><p>Having made the case that high inflation is now already a given, it won’t be long before the Fed is caught in a trap where it needs to continue creating money in order to keep the market rising and to keep stimulating the economy, but it won’t be able to. That’s why we hear the Fed talking incessantly about how inflation is “transitory” right now. The Fed NEEDS to have all investors believe that the rapidly dawning period of inflation will be short so it can be ignored. The Fed needs the market to believe it CAN and WILL keep printing money.</p><p><blockquote>在证明高通胀已经成为必然之后，用不了多久，美联储就会陷入一个陷阱，需要继续创造货币以保持市场上涨并继续刺激经济，但它不会。这就是为什么我们听到美联储不停地谈论通胀现在是“暂时的”。美联储需要让所有投资者相信通胀的快速曙光期将会很短，因此可以忽略它。美联储需要市场相信它能够也将继续印钞。</blockquote></p><p>However, the Fed is just fooling itself. The longer it claims inflation is temporary so that it can ignore the rapidly rising numbers, the more inflation will move out of control because the Fed and the federal government keep the money printing and the armored cars for transporting it running around the clock. (Figuratively speaking, of course.)</p><p><blockquote>然而，美联储只是在自欺欺人。它声称通货膨胀是暂时的，以便它可以忽略快速上升的数字，通货膨胀就会越失控，因为美联储和联邦政府继续印钞和运送钞票的装甲车昼夜不停地运行。（当然是比喻性的。）</blockquote></p><p>The Fed may fool itself to its (and our) longterm harm, but it is not likely to fool the market much longer because the numbers will be coming in too high for the market to ignore. We’ve saw that on Wednesday in how the market responded to news of the highest inflation in years — a number annualized at 4.2% in April, which is well below the level of inflation we’re about to see this summer. That’s just the wind-up for the pitch.</p><p><blockquote>美联储可能会欺骗自己（和我们）的长期伤害，但它不太可能欺骗市场太久，因为这些数字将太高，市场无法忽视。周三，我们在市场对多年来最高通胀消息的反应中看到了这一点——4月份的年化通胀为4.2%，远低于我们今年夏天即将看到的通胀水平。这只是球场的结束。</blockquote></p><p><b>How inflation will fight the Fed and win</b></p><p><blockquote><b>通胀将如何对抗美联储并获胜</b></blockquote></p><p>The danger inflation imposes is that, if it rises as high as I am certain it is going to rise (double digits), then the Fed will be forced to raise its interest targets because the market will shove interest up regardless, making the Fed look dumb for claiming an interest target it cannot hold. The Fed won’t be able to what it takes to hold interest down without creating massively greater inflation through its creation of new money.</p><p><blockquote>通胀带来的危险是，如果通胀升至我确定的水平（两位数），那么美联储将被迫提高利率目标，因为市场无论如何都会推高利率，这使得美联储看起来很愚蠢。声称自己无法持有的利率目标。美联储将无法在不通过创造新货币造成更大通胀的情况下压低利率。</blockquote></p><p>However, it is not just that the bond vigilantes will wrest control of interest out of the Fed’s hands, it’s that the stock market will force the Fed to deal with inflation by fearing it whether the Fed says it should or not. Consumers will also press congress to press the Fed to deal with inflation. The longer it delays, the more massively the Fed will have to raise interest rates, just as Paul Volker did in the 80’s to get inflation under control.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这不仅仅是债券义务警员会从美联储手中夺取利息控制权，股市也会迫使美联储通过担心通胀来应对通胀，无论美联储是否表示应该这样做。消费者还将向国会施压，要求美联储应对通胀。拖延的时间越长，美联储就必须加息的幅度就越大，就像保罗·沃尔克在80年代为控制通胀所做的那样。</blockquote></p><p>This conundrum is starting to materialize now at a time when the stock market is at absurdly perilous heights. Faint realizations of inflation are no longer so faint, which is why the market is running out of momentum. Investors are starting to believe the Fed will lose control of interest rates. Investors are starting to doubt the Fed’s words of confidence.</p><p><blockquote>在股市处于荒谬的危险高度之际，这个难题现在开始成为现实。对通胀的微弱认识不再那么微弱，这就是市场动力不足的原因。投资者开始相信美联储将失去对利率的控制。投资者开始怀疑美联储的信心之言。</blockquote></p><p>Of course, to crash, momentum has to turn downward, and that won’t likely happen until the market is certain the Fed is going to lose control; but that can happen slowly at first and then quickly as it did in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>当然，要崩溃，势头必须转向下行，而在市场确定美联储将失去控制之前，这种情况不太可能发生；但这可能会像2018年那样缓慢发生，然后很快发生。</blockquote></p><p>Inflation is a time bomb on the Fed’s back. My thesis is that every month now the Fed is going to find it harder and harder to maintain the illusion that it can keep creating money, pumping it into mom-and-pop investor hands (retail investors, the Robinhood crowed, etc.) through government stimulus programs (at the government’s demand) and keep trying to maintain low interest to pump money into the stock market via corporate stock buybacks funded on loans. Inflation will crush easy money. It rule. The Fed can rule over it, but only by taking away money and crashing markets that are utterly dependent on that money.</p><p><blockquote>通胀是美联储背上的定时炸弹。我的论点是，现在每个月美联储都会发现越来越难维持这样的幻想：它可以继续创造货币，将其注入普通投资者（散户投资者、罗宾汉人群等）手中。）通过政府刺激计划（应政府的要求），并继续努力保持低利率，通过贷款资助的公司股票回购向股市注入资金。通货膨胀会压垮宽松的货币。它统治着。美联储可以统治它，但只能通过拿走资金并摧毁完全依赖这些资金的市场。</blockquote></p><p>The plate spinner is starting to lose control of all the plates it has to keep twirling on the ends of little sticks. Today’s action in the market shows the market is starting to pay attention to the clatter of falling plates as inflation shows up worse than investors feared. The&nbsp;<i>real</i>&nbsp;fear — the deep paralyzing fear that is only now being foreshadowed — is not competition from rising bond yields (certain as that is to come) but that inflation will become hot enough that the Fed will be forced to turn off all of its go juice.</p><p><blockquote>盘子旋转器开始失去对所有盘子的控制，它必须在小棍子的末端保持旋转。今天的市场走势表明，随着通胀表现得比投资者担心的更糟糕，市场开始关注板块下跌的声音。The<i>真的</i>恐惧——直到现在才被预示的深度瘫痪恐惧——不是来自债券收益率上升的竞争（尽管这肯定会到来），而是通胀将变得足够激烈，以至于美联储将被迫关闭所有的go果汁。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Inflation has the power to suddenly turn market sentiment on its head because, well, follow the money back to where it is coming from.</p><p><blockquote>通货膨胀有能力突然扭转市场情绪，因为，嗯，跟随资金回到它的来源。</blockquote></p><p>Stocks headed sharply lower as inflation jitters percolated again, following a report showing U.S. inflation in the year to April rose at its fastest pace in about 13 years, amid the recovery from the COVID pandemic. <i>MarketWatch</i>Inflation jitters will become inflation&nbsp;<i>panic</i>&nbsp;when it becomes clear that the rise to 4.2 is not just a blip but the first step on the consumer side of many steps to come. Hopefully none of my readers were paying much attention to economists who were forecasting a meager 3.6%.</p><p><blockquote>一份报告显示，随着新冠疫情的复苏，截至4月份的一年里，美国通胀率以约13年来最快的速度上升，通胀担忧再次蔓延，股市大幅走低。<i>市场观察</i>通胀不安将变成通胀<i>恐慌</i>当很明显，升至4.2不仅仅是一个暂时现象，而是消费者方面未来许多步骤中的第一步。希望我的读者中没有人太关注那些预测只有3.6%的经济学家。</blockquote></p><p>“Inflation destroys wealth. Period,” said Patrick Leary, head of trading at Incapital, in an interview with MarketWatch. “We see inflation showing up in markets. If it’s indeed transitory, markets can live with it.&nbsp; <b><i>But if it’s not transitory, that’s when it is going to become troubling for stocks.</i></b>”The destruction of wealth is one concern, but the bigger concern, I believe, is the loss of the Amazon-scale, easy-money stream into the market. This is why the market went up when the jobs report was truly horrible. The report of slackening employment eased feelings of concern about inflation causing the Fed to turn off the flow. Its why the market plunged today on solid news to the contrary of higher inflation than many were expecting.</p><p><blockquote>Incapital交易主管帕特里克·利里(Patrick Leary)在接受MarketWatch采访时表示：“通货膨胀会摧毁财富。就这样。”“我们看到通货膨胀出现在市场上。如果它确实是暂时的，市场可以接受。<b><i>但如果它不是暂时的，那么它就会成为股市的麻烦。</i></b>“财富的破坏是一个担忧，但我认为，更大的担忧是亚马逊规模的、轻松流入市场的资金的损失。这就是为什么当就业报告非常糟糕时，市场会上涨。就业疲软的报告缓解了人们对通胀的担忧，导致美联储关闭了资金流动。这就是为什么今天市场因与通胀高于许多人预期相反的可靠消息而暴跌。</blockquote></p><p>The Fed’s hand may soon be forced by reality; and if you’ve been reading here — particularly the Patron Posts that focused intensively on inflation, you’ve had a good idea of what is coming. One won’t have to wait until the Fed tightens to stop inflation, however; one only has to wait until stock investors become convinced the Fed will have to tighten,<i>&nbsp;regardless of what the Fed claims to assure investors it won’t.</i></p><p><blockquote>美联储的手可能很快就会被现实所迫；如果你一直在这里阅读——尤其是那些重点关注通货膨胀的顾客帖子，你就会对即将发生的事情有一个很好的了解。然而，人们不必等到美联储收紧政策才能阻止通胀；人们只需要等到股票投资者确信美联储将不得不收紧货币政策，<i>不管美联储声称如何向投资者保证不会。</i></blockquote></p><p>As&nbsp;<i>MarketWatch</i>&nbsp;noted yesterday,</p><p><blockquote>作为<i>市场观察</i>昨天指出，</blockquote></p><p>Tuesday is looking dicey for stocks, notably the technology space,&nbsp; <b><i>as inflation jitters continue to ripple across markets. The sector has been bearing the brunt of concerns that higher inflation may prompt an early end to the Federal Reserve’s COVID-19 pandemic-driven accommodative stance.</i></b>&nbsp;After last week’s downside jobs surprise, some fear&nbsp; <b><i>Wednesday’s consumer price data could also deliver a nasty shock.</i></b>The market is top-heavy and jittery under its own load to such an extent that it will crash if it merely believes the Fed will be forced to tighten. That’s why it jolted as a foreshock today, but it wasn’t a shock at all if you’ve been reading here. It was expected.</p><p><blockquote>周二股市看起来充满风险，尤其是科技股，<b><i>随着通胀不安情绪继续波及整个市场。该行业一直首当其冲，人们担心通胀上升可能会促使美联储提前结束COVID-19大流行推动的宽松立场。</i></b>在上周就业意外下滑之后，一些人感到担忧<b><i>周三的消费者价格数据也可能带来严重冲击。</i></b>市场在自身负荷下头重脚轻、紧张不安，如果仅仅相信美联储将被迫紧缩，市场就会崩溃。这就是为什么今天它像前震一样震动，但如果你一直在这里阅读，它根本不是一个冲击。这是意料之中的。</blockquote></p><p><b><i>Inflation is the “</i></b> <b>worst-case</b> <b><i>&nbsp;scenario” for this ticking-time-bomb market full of complacent investors,</i></b>&nbsp;warns our call of the day from Thomas H. Kee Jr., president and chief executive of Stock Traders Daily and portfolio manager at Equity Logic.And here’s the&nbsp;<i>key</i>:</p><p><blockquote><b><i>通货膨胀是“</i></b><b>最坏情况</b><b><i>情景”对于这个充满自满投资者的定时炸弹市场，</i></b>Stock Traders Daily总裁兼首席执行官兼Equity Logic投资组合经理Thomas H.Kee Jr.警告我们当天的看涨期权。这是<i>钥匙</i>：</blockquote></p><p>“Arguably, the ONLY reason stimulus has even been possible is because there has been no inflation.&nbsp; <b><i>If inflation comes back,</i></b> <b>all</b> <b><i>&nbsp;of the safeguards investors have been given (free money from stimulus) will be dissolved and won’t be</i></b> <b>able</b> <b><i>&nbsp;to come back to save the day</i></b>,” Kee told MarketWatch…. He said recent jobs data indeed suggest price rises will be “more serious than previously thought….”“The declines can be much worse than 25% and <b><i>&nbsp;if the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] is handcuffed because of inflation, the swift bounce back that investors have been used to will not happen</i></b>&nbsp;either,” said Kee. “The fair value multiple on the SPX SPX (^GSPC) is not 30 – [to] 35x. It’s more like 15x….”What would bring that down to earth is the return of natural-risk perceptions among investors — severely lacking right now. “They have been given free money by the government, stimulus programs are in full effect, and investors don’t perceive any risk at all. That is the most dangerous thing!” Kee said….“ <b><i>When the big buyer is not there … that is when natural perceptions of risk come back, and if that happens … watch out below!!</i></b>”You see, rising inflation has the power to cut the Fed off at the knees. The kind of inflation I’ve been writing about can suck the mojo right out of the Fed, and that is why Powell is already doing his best to convince financial markets that the Fed&nbsp;<i>wants</i>&nbsp;higher inflation and convince them that the higher inflation it wants is temporary before it even begins.</p><p><blockquote>“可以说，刺激措施成为可能的唯一原因是因为没有通货膨胀。<b><i>如果通胀卷土重来，</i></b><b>全部</b><b><i>投资者获得的保障措施（刺激计划中的免费资金）将被解散，而且不会</i></b><b>能干</b><b><i>回来拯救世界</i></b>，”Kee告诉MarketWatch……他表示，最近的就业数据确实表明价格上涨将“比之前想象的更严重……”“下降幅度可能比25%严重得多<b><i>如果FOMC（联邦公开市场委员会）因为通货膨胀而被束缚，投资者已经习惯的快速反弹将不会发生</i></b>基说。“SPX SPX(^GSPC)的公允价值倍数不是30-[至]35倍。更像是15倍……”让这一点变得现实的是投资者自然风险认知的回归——目前这种认知严重缺乏。“政府给了他们免费的钱，刺激计划全面生效，投资者根本没有察觉到任何风险。那是最危险的事情！”纪说……”<b><i>当大买家不在那里时…那就是对风险的自然感知回来的时候，如果发生这种情况…请注意下面！！</i></b>“你看，通胀上升有能力让美联储屈服。我一直在写的那种通胀可能会让美联储失去魔力，这就是为什么鲍威尔已经在尽最大努力让金融市场相信美联储<i>想要</i>更高的通胀，并让他们相信它想要的更高通胀在开始之前就是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p>Market susceptibility</p><p><blockquote>市场易感性</blockquote></p><p>Notes Lance Roberts,</p><p><blockquote>兰斯·罗伯茨指出，</blockquote></p><p></p><p><b><i>There is no way this bull market doesn’t end very badly. We all know that is the reality of this liquidity-fueled market,</i></b>&nbsp;but we keep investing for “Fear Of Missing Out.” <i>Seeking Alpha</i>How much does all that stimulus money from Fed and Feds pouring into the market create the cashflow that made the past year’s insanity possible?</p><p><blockquote><b><i>这次牛市不可能不以非常糟糕的方式结束。我们都知道这是这个流动性推动的市场的现实，</i></b>但我们继续投资是因为“害怕错过”。<i>寻求阿尔法</i>美联储和美联储涌入市场的所有刺激资金创造了多少现金流，使过去一年的疯狂成为可能？</blockquote></p><p>Over the past 5-MONTHS, more money has poured into the equity markets than in the last 12-YEARS combined.Do the math and ask yourself what happens if the money HAS to be turned off because inflation forces the Fed to stop creating to much new money in an environment of to few goods due to previous COVID-shutdown shortages and the continuing problems they’ve set up.</p><p><blockquote>过去5个月，涌入股市的资金比过去12年的总和还要多。算一算，问问你自己，如果货币不得不被关闭，会发生什么，因为通货膨胀迫使美联储停止在商品很少的环境中创造大量新货币，这是由于以前的COVID关闭短缺和他们已经建立的持续问题。</blockquote></p><p>And, if you don’t think the market is precariously riding high on easy money, look at how much it is rising on rising margin debt (money owed to brokers):</p><p><blockquote>而且，如果您不认为市场因宽松资金而不稳定地走高，请看看保证金债务（欠经纪人的钱）上升导致市场上涨了多少：</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ca87d635f36dfaa1c989d7e459550d1\" tg-width=\"914\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Seeking Alpha</i></p><p><blockquote><i>寻求阿尔法</i></blockquote></p><p>When the Fed is pressed hard to raise interest rates and stop printing money, brokers aren’t going to be so free in lending money. Right now, it’s easy money at almost free rates. More to the point, though, when the market does start coming down because of concerns about the Fed cutting off easy money, all that margin debt starts unwinding in a hurry as people are forced to sell assets and reduce their margin debt.</p><p><blockquote>当美联储面临加息和停止印钞的压力时，经纪人就不会如此自由地放贷了。现在，以几乎免费的利率轻松赚钱。然而，更重要的是，当市场因担心美联储切断宽松货币供应而开始下跌时，所有保证金债务都开始匆忙平仓，因为人们被迫出售资产并减少保证金债务。</blockquote></p><p>As you can also see, huge, rapid spikes like this in market debt tend to happen right before severe crashes:</p><p><blockquote>正如您还可以看到的，市场债务往往会在严重崩盘之前发生像这样的巨大、快速飙升：</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ff13864e0443e2a448952529cdf6e2c\" tg-width=\"758\" tg-height=\"511\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Seeking Alpha</i></p><p><blockquote><i>寻求阿尔法</i></blockquote></p><p>In the short term, fundamentals do not matter. However, in the long term, they matter a lot.Sentiment can cause investors to overlook economic fundamentals for a long time, but a sudden change in perception of fundamentals long overlooked in an environment of high margin debt and bring a rapid correction of one’s frame of reference.</p><p><blockquote>短期来看，基本面并不重要。然而，从长远来看，它们非常重要。情绪可能会导致投资者长期忽视经济基本面，但在高利润率债务的环境下，对长期被忽视的基本面看法的突然变化会带来人们的快速修正框架参考。</blockquote></p><p>Currently, investors are overlooking fundamentals on the expectation the economy and earnings will improve to justify the market overvaluation.That is not likely to happen. Even if it does, perception of the financial landscape (the core value of of money) has been far too optimistic in most circles, as seen by the shock today; but you could see this coming from a year away.</p><p><blockquote>目前，投资者忽视了经济和盈利将改善的基本面，以证明市场高估的合理性。这不太可能发生。即使是这样，大多数圈子对金融格局（货币的核心价值）的看法也过于乐观，正如今天的冲击所表明的那样；但你可以看到一年后的情况。</blockquote></p><p>The Fed talks as though it still doesn’t see what is coming, but that’s the same Fed that talked about how easy tightening was going to be. It appears it had no idea that it didn’t have an exit plan that wouldn’t send sentiment sharply south and crash the market. Yet, that, too, could be seen from years away by those who were not worshipping at the feet of Father Fed.</p><p><blockquote>美联储说得好像它仍然没有看到未来会发生什么，但这就是美联储谈论紧缩将是多么容易。它似乎不知道自己没有一个不会导致市场情绪急剧下降并导致市场崩溃的退出计划。然而，那些不在费德神父脚下敬拜的人，多年后也能看到这一点。</blockquote></p><p>When, or if, expectations of recovery are disappointed, the market will begin to reprice itself for its intrinsic value. Given that the market is currently trading more than twice the level of underlying economic growth, which is where corporate profits come from, such suggests a significant risk.That’s why the Dow fell 682 points (2%) today, and the S&amp;P fell 2.14% and the NASDAQ, 368 points (2.67%). There wasn’t much of a safe space to be found in stocks.</p><p><blockquote>当复苏预期落空时，市场将开始为其内在价值重新定价。鉴于市场目前的交易水平是潜在经济增长水平的两倍多，而潜在经济增长是企业利润的来源，这表明存在重大风险。这就是为什么道琼斯指数今天下跌682点（2%），标准普尔指数下跌2.14%，纳斯达克下跌368点（2.67%）。股票中没有太多安全的空间。</blockquote></p><p>Don’t tell me inflation doesn’t matter to this market. Worst day in six months. More on this in another Patron Post.</p><p><blockquote>别告诉我通货膨胀对这个市场无关紧要。六个月来最糟糕的一天。在另一个顾客帖子中会有更多的介绍。</blockquote></p><p>Now let me, once again, do the kind of corrective reporting I said was going to be essential at this time. First, the fake news:</p><p><blockquote>现在，让我再一次做我说过的在这个时候是必不可少的那种纠正性报告。一、假新闻：</blockquote></p><p>One big reason for the acceleration was&nbsp; <i>base effects</i>&nbsp;– at this time a year ago, the economy was hit with the worst of the Covid pandemic and inflation was unusually low.CNBCThat isn’t accurate. As I said in my last Patron Post, wherein I also laid out the statistical facts and source to back up my statement,</p><p><blockquote>加速的一个重要原因是<i>基础效应</i>-一年前的这个时候，经济受到了新冠疫情最严重的打击，通货膨胀率异常低。CNBC这并不准确。正如我在上一篇赞助人帖子中所说，我还列出了统计事实和来源来支持我的声明，</blockquote></p><p>Food prices and many other prices rose like they normally do last March, in spite of the pandemic. In fact, after March, they rose worse than normal with every month in the remainder of 2020 coming in between 3.5% and 4% on an annualized basis.“Inflation Tsunami Sirens Are Screaming!“I noted in particular one economist who said groceries and fuel were now just making up for last time:</p><p><blockquote>尽管发生了疫情，食品价格和许多其他价格仍像去年三月一样上涨。事实上，3月份之后，它们的涨幅比正常情况更糟糕，2020年剩余时间里每个月的年化涨幅都在3.5%至4%之间。“通胀海啸警报正在尖叫！”我特别注意到一位经济学家，他说食品杂货和燃料现在只是在弥补上次的损失：</blockquote></p><p>So,&nbsp; <i>like groceries,</i>&nbsp;gas is catching up to get back to where we would actually expect it to be….What predominantly happened last year was that&nbsp;<i>fuel</i>&nbsp;prices plummeted due to nothing being transported and lack of vacationing and lack of commuting, but&nbsp;<i>groceries</i>? Come on!</p><p><blockquote>所以，<i>比如食品杂货，</i>气体正在赶上回到我们实际预期的位置…去年主要发生的是<i>燃料</i>由于没有任何东西被运输，缺乏度假和通勤，价格暴跌，但<i>杂货</i>？来吧！</blockquote></p><p></p><p>“Catching up” may be true for gas if you look back to where prices were in 2018, but it’s total horse manure when you embrace groceries in the comment. Groceries have no catching up to do whatsoever. The average rate of inflation for food for all of 2020 was 3.4%, which compares to rates that 0.3%-2.5% for every year going back until 2011 where the average for the year was. 3.6%.And while overall inflation was less than normal for April through June last year, what does that have to do with this year? [Overall] prices still rose last year; so, it is NOT as if you are comparing to an anomalous year where overall prices fell in those months, meaning some of this year’s gain was just making up for last year’s unusual loss. Then you could truthfully say there was a base effect.<b><i>So, inflation is coming in much hotter than the Fed led people to believe; and, as my recent Patron Posts have laid out, there is plenty more inflation already baked in on the producer side that will certainly be passed through. I noted you could expect to see that starting to show up on the consumer side now, and you just did. It’s going to be an inflation-hot summer, which can sour sentiment, so stocks won’t take well to that. To be sure, there is a lot of testosterone still determined to press stocks up no matter what, but a hot and humid summer will zap that sentiment, as it did today; and it will keep zapping it no matter what the charts readers are prognosticating based on current sentimental trends. Trends can change quickly in the face of facts</i></b><b>if</b><b><i>&nbsp;the facts crash in with enough vigor. I think high inflation is the much-feared fact that can break through by stopping the Fed’s plans from moving forward.</i></b></p><p><blockquote>如果你回顾2018年的价格，汽油的“追赶”可能是真的，但当你在评论中接受杂货时，这完全是马粪。食品杂货没有什么可做的。2020年全年食品的平均通胀率为3.4%，相比之下，自2011年以来，每年的平均通胀率为0.3%-2.5%。3.6%。虽然去年4月至6月的整体通胀率低于正常水平，但这与今年有什么关系呢？【总体】去年物价仍上涨；因此，这并不是说你在与一个反常的年份进行比较，在这几个月里，整体价格下跌，这意味着今年的一些涨幅只是弥补了去年的反常损失。那么你就可以如实地说有一个基数效应。<b><i>因此，通货膨胀的到来比美联储让人们相信的要严重得多；而且，正如我最近的赞助人帖子所展示的那样，生产者方面已经酝酿了更多的通货膨胀，这肯定会被传递出去。我注意到你现在可以期待看到这一点开始出现在消费者方面，你也确实做到了。这将是一个通胀炎热的夏天，这可能会恶化市场情绪，因此股市不会很好地适应。可以肯定的是，无论如何，仍然有很多睾丸激素决心推高股市，但炎热潮湿的夏天将会摧毁这种情绪，就像今天一样；无论图表读者根据当前的情绪趋势做出什么预测，它都会继续波动。在事实面前，趋势会很快改变</i></b><b>如果</b><b><i>事实以足够的活力闯入。我认为高通胀是一个令人恐惧的事实，它可以通过阻止美联储计划的推进来突破。</i></b></blockquote></p><p>If the Fed does keep moving forward with the same kind of blind ignorance and stubborn resolve to prove itself right that led it to keep pursuing its economic tightening regime (as I claimed it would do for too long in 2018, contrary to good judgment), it will really be making things worse for itself and harder to tame. I think that is not unlikely.</p><p><blockquote>如果美联储真的继续带着同样的盲目无知和顽固的决心前进，以证明自己是正确的，这导致它继续推行经济紧缩制度（正如我在2018年声称的那样，这与良好的判断相反），它真的会让事情变得更糟，更难驯服。我认为这不是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p>“ <b><i>There are people who think the Fed is not just behind the curve, they’re maybe missing the point and by the time they start to play catch up, it’s too late,</i></b>” Wall Street veteran Art Cashin said WednesdayCNBCAs one economist noted,</p><p><blockquote>“<b><i>有些人认为美联储不仅仅落后于形势，他们可能没有抓住要点，当他们开始追赶时，已经太晚了，</i></b>华尔街资深人士Art Cashin周三表示CNBCAS的一位经济学家指出，</blockquote></p><p>“We doubt this report will change the view of officials that inflationary pressures are ‘largely transitory,‘” wrote Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.&nbsp; <b><i>“It’s just that there’s a</i></b> <b>lot more</b> <b><i>&nbsp;‘transitory’ than they were expecting.</i></b>”CNBCIndeed. A lot more. What will they do when they run out of a fake base effect to blame it on?</p><p><blockquote>凯投宏观(Capital Economics)美国高级经济学家迈克尔·皮尔斯(Michael Pearce)写道：“我们怀疑这份报告能否改变官员们的看法，即通胀压力‘很大程度上是暂时的’。”<b><i>“只是有一个</i></b><b>更多</b><b><i>比他们预期的“短暂”。</i></b>“CNBC确实如此。更多。当他们用完一个假的基础效应来指责它时，他们会怎么做？</blockquote></p><p>Liked it? Take a second to support David Haggith on Patreon!</p><p><blockquote>喜欢吗？花点时间在Patreon上支持大卫·哈吉斯！</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Inflation Will Kill This Stock Market<blockquote>通货膨胀会扼杀这个股市</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInflation Will Kill This Stock Market<blockquote>通货膨胀会扼杀这个股市</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-13 16:01</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>I’m not saying nothing else can do the job before inflation fully gets here, just that the kind of inflation I’ve been writing about certainly will do it if nothing else does. That’s what terrifies the market and for a very good reason that may not be the first one that comes to some investors’ minds.</p><p><blockquote>我并不是说在通货膨胀完全到来之前，其他任何东西都无法完成这项工作，只是说如果没有其他东西，我所写的那种通货膨胀肯定会完成这项工作。这就是市场的恐惧，而且有一个很好的理由，这可能不是一些投资者首先想到的。</blockquote></p><p>Many talk about the “risk premium” of investing in stocks. As inflation rises, bond yields rise to offset what will be lost to inflation. As bond yields rise, stocks become less competitive.</p><p><blockquote>许多人谈论投资股票的“风险溢价”。随着通胀上升，债券收益率上升，以抵消通胀造成的损失。随着债券收益率上升，股票竞争力下降。</blockquote></p><p>That’s a problem, but it’s not the big problem. Not this time.</p><p><blockquote>这是个问题，但不是大问题。这次不行。</blockquote></p><p>The big&nbsp;problem is that we all know where the money for stocks is coming from — the Federal reserve and the US government by borrowing and distributing the money the Fed prints. So, the big problem is the Fed.</p><p><blockquote>最大的问题是，我们都知道购买股票的资金来自哪里——美联储和美国政府通过借入和分配美联储印刷的资金。所以，最大的问题是美联储。</blockquote></p><p><b>Fed is getting tangled in a mess of its own making</b></p><p><blockquote><b>美联储正陷入自己造成的混乱之中</b></blockquote></p><p>Having made the case that high inflation is now already a given, it won’t be long before the Fed is caught in a trap where it needs to continue creating money in order to keep the market rising and to keep stimulating the economy, but it won’t be able to. That’s why we hear the Fed talking incessantly about how inflation is “transitory” right now. The Fed NEEDS to have all investors believe that the rapidly dawning period of inflation will be short so it can be ignored. The Fed needs the market to believe it CAN and WILL keep printing money.</p><p><blockquote>在证明高通胀已经成为必然之后，用不了多久，美联储就会陷入一个陷阱，需要继续创造货币以保持市场上涨并继续刺激经济，但它不会。这就是为什么我们听到美联储不停地谈论通胀现在是“暂时的”。美联储需要让所有投资者相信通胀的快速曙光期将会很短，因此可以忽略它。美联储需要市场相信它能够也将继续印钞。</blockquote></p><p>However, the Fed is just fooling itself. The longer it claims inflation is temporary so that it can ignore the rapidly rising numbers, the more inflation will move out of control because the Fed and the federal government keep the money printing and the armored cars for transporting it running around the clock. (Figuratively speaking, of course.)</p><p><blockquote>然而，美联储只是在自欺欺人。它声称通货膨胀是暂时的，以便它可以忽略快速上升的数字，通货膨胀就会越失控，因为美联储和联邦政府继续印钞和运送钞票的装甲车昼夜不停地运行。（当然是比喻性的。）</blockquote></p><p>The Fed may fool itself to its (and our) longterm harm, but it is not likely to fool the market much longer because the numbers will be coming in too high for the market to ignore. We’ve saw that on Wednesday in how the market responded to news of the highest inflation in years — a number annualized at 4.2% in April, which is well below the level of inflation we’re about to see this summer. That’s just the wind-up for the pitch.</p><p><blockquote>美联储可能会欺骗自己（和我们）的长期伤害，但它不太可能欺骗市场太久，因为这些数字将太高，市场无法忽视。周三，我们在市场对多年来最高通胀消息的反应中看到了这一点——4月份的年化通胀为4.2%，远低于我们今年夏天即将看到的通胀水平。这只是球场的结束。</blockquote></p><p><b>How inflation will fight the Fed and win</b></p><p><blockquote><b>通胀将如何对抗美联储并获胜</b></blockquote></p><p>The danger inflation imposes is that, if it rises as high as I am certain it is going to rise (double digits), then the Fed will be forced to raise its interest targets because the market will shove interest up regardless, making the Fed look dumb for claiming an interest target it cannot hold. The Fed won’t be able to what it takes to hold interest down without creating massively greater inflation through its creation of new money.</p><p><blockquote>通胀带来的危险是，如果通胀升至我确定的水平（两位数），那么美联储将被迫提高利率目标，因为市场无论如何都会推高利率，这使得美联储看起来很愚蠢。声称自己无法持有的利率目标。美联储将无法在不通过创造新货币造成更大通胀的情况下压低利率。</blockquote></p><p>However, it is not just that the bond vigilantes will wrest control of interest out of the Fed’s hands, it’s that the stock market will force the Fed to deal with inflation by fearing it whether the Fed says it should or not. Consumers will also press congress to press the Fed to deal with inflation. The longer it delays, the more massively the Fed will have to raise interest rates, just as Paul Volker did in the 80’s to get inflation under control.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这不仅仅是债券义务警员会从美联储手中夺取利息控制权，股市也会迫使美联储通过担心通胀来应对通胀，无论美联储是否表示应该这样做。消费者还将向国会施压，要求美联储应对通胀。拖延的时间越长，美联储就必须加息的幅度就越大，就像保罗·沃尔克在80年代为控制通胀所做的那样。</blockquote></p><p>This conundrum is starting to materialize now at a time when the stock market is at absurdly perilous heights. Faint realizations of inflation are no longer so faint, which is why the market is running out of momentum. Investors are starting to believe the Fed will lose control of interest rates. Investors are starting to doubt the Fed’s words of confidence.</p><p><blockquote>在股市处于荒谬的危险高度之际，这个难题现在开始成为现实。对通胀的微弱认识不再那么微弱，这就是市场动力不足的原因。投资者开始相信美联储将失去对利率的控制。投资者开始怀疑美联储的信心之言。</blockquote></p><p>Of course, to crash, momentum has to turn downward, and that won’t likely happen until the market is certain the Fed is going to lose control; but that can happen slowly at first and then quickly as it did in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>当然，要崩溃，势头必须转向下行，而在市场确定美联储将失去控制之前，这种情况不太可能发生；但这可能会像2018年那样缓慢发生，然后很快发生。</blockquote></p><p>Inflation is a time bomb on the Fed’s back. My thesis is that every month now the Fed is going to find it harder and harder to maintain the illusion that it can keep creating money, pumping it into mom-and-pop investor hands (retail investors, the Robinhood crowed, etc.) through government stimulus programs (at the government’s demand) and keep trying to maintain low interest to pump money into the stock market via corporate stock buybacks funded on loans. Inflation will crush easy money. It rule. The Fed can rule over it, but only by taking away money and crashing markets that are utterly dependent on that money.</p><p><blockquote>通胀是美联储背上的定时炸弹。我的论点是，现在每个月美联储都会发现越来越难维持这样的幻想：它可以继续创造货币，将其注入普通投资者（散户投资者、罗宾汉人群等）手中。）通过政府刺激计划（应政府的要求），并继续努力保持低利率，通过贷款资助的公司股票回购向股市注入资金。通货膨胀会压垮宽松的货币。它统治着。美联储可以统治它，但只能通过拿走资金并摧毁完全依赖这些资金的市场。</blockquote></p><p>The plate spinner is starting to lose control of all the plates it has to keep twirling on the ends of little sticks. Today’s action in the market shows the market is starting to pay attention to the clatter of falling plates as inflation shows up worse than investors feared. The&nbsp;<i>real</i>&nbsp;fear — the deep paralyzing fear that is only now being foreshadowed — is not competition from rising bond yields (certain as that is to come) but that inflation will become hot enough that the Fed will be forced to turn off all of its go juice.</p><p><blockquote>盘子旋转器开始失去对所有盘子的控制，它必须在小棍子的末端保持旋转。今天的市场走势表明，随着通胀表现得比投资者担心的更糟糕，市场开始关注板块下跌的声音。The<i>真的</i>恐惧——直到现在才被预示的深度瘫痪恐惧——不是来自债券收益率上升的竞争（尽管这肯定会到来），而是通胀将变得足够激烈，以至于美联储将被迫关闭所有的go果汁。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Inflation has the power to suddenly turn market sentiment on its head because, well, follow the money back to where it is coming from.</p><p><blockquote>通货膨胀有能力突然扭转市场情绪，因为，嗯，跟随资金回到它的来源。</blockquote></p><p>Stocks headed sharply lower as inflation jitters percolated again, following a report showing U.S. inflation in the year to April rose at its fastest pace in about 13 years, amid the recovery from the COVID pandemic. <i>MarketWatch</i>Inflation jitters will become inflation&nbsp;<i>panic</i>&nbsp;when it becomes clear that the rise to 4.2 is not just a blip but the first step on the consumer side of many steps to come. Hopefully none of my readers were paying much attention to economists who were forecasting a meager 3.6%.</p><p><blockquote>一份报告显示，随着新冠疫情的复苏，截至4月份的一年里，美国通胀率以约13年来最快的速度上升，通胀担忧再次蔓延，股市大幅走低。<i>市场观察</i>通胀不安将变成通胀<i>恐慌</i>当很明显，升至4.2不仅仅是一个暂时现象，而是消费者方面未来许多步骤中的第一步。希望我的读者中没有人太关注那些预测只有3.6%的经济学家。</blockquote></p><p>“Inflation destroys wealth. Period,” said Patrick Leary, head of trading at Incapital, in an interview with MarketWatch. “We see inflation showing up in markets. If it’s indeed transitory, markets can live with it.&nbsp; <b><i>But if it’s not transitory, that’s when it is going to become troubling for stocks.</i></b>”The destruction of wealth is one concern, but the bigger concern, I believe, is the loss of the Amazon-scale, easy-money stream into the market. This is why the market went up when the jobs report was truly horrible. The report of slackening employment eased feelings of concern about inflation causing the Fed to turn off the flow. Its why the market plunged today on solid news to the contrary of higher inflation than many were expecting.</p><p><blockquote>Incapital交易主管帕特里克·利里(Patrick Leary)在接受MarketWatch采访时表示：“通货膨胀会摧毁财富。就这样。”“我们看到通货膨胀出现在市场上。如果它确实是暂时的，市场可以接受。<b><i>但如果它不是暂时的，那么它就会成为股市的麻烦。</i></b>“财富的破坏是一个担忧，但我认为，更大的担忧是亚马逊规模的、轻松流入市场的资金的损失。这就是为什么当就业报告非常糟糕时，市场会上涨。就业疲软的报告缓解了人们对通胀的担忧，导致美联储关闭了资金流动。这就是为什么今天市场因与通胀高于许多人预期相反的可靠消息而暴跌。</blockquote></p><p>The Fed’s hand may soon be forced by reality; and if you’ve been reading here — particularly the Patron Posts that focused intensively on inflation, you’ve had a good idea of what is coming. One won’t have to wait until the Fed tightens to stop inflation, however; one only has to wait until stock investors become convinced the Fed will have to tighten,<i>&nbsp;regardless of what the Fed claims to assure investors it won’t.</i></p><p><blockquote>美联储的手可能很快就会被现实所迫；如果你一直在这里阅读——尤其是那些重点关注通货膨胀的顾客帖子，你就会对即将发生的事情有一个很好的了解。然而，人们不必等到美联储收紧政策才能阻止通胀；人们只需要等到股票投资者确信美联储将不得不收紧货币政策，<i>不管美联储声称如何向投资者保证不会。</i></blockquote></p><p>As&nbsp;<i>MarketWatch</i>&nbsp;noted yesterday,</p><p><blockquote>作为<i>市场观察</i>昨天指出，</blockquote></p><p>Tuesday is looking dicey for stocks, notably the technology space,&nbsp; <b><i>as inflation jitters continue to ripple across markets. The sector has been bearing the brunt of concerns that higher inflation may prompt an early end to the Federal Reserve’s COVID-19 pandemic-driven accommodative stance.</i></b>&nbsp;After last week’s downside jobs surprise, some fear&nbsp; <b><i>Wednesday’s consumer price data could also deliver a nasty shock.</i></b>The market is top-heavy and jittery under its own load to such an extent that it will crash if it merely believes the Fed will be forced to tighten. That’s why it jolted as a foreshock today, but it wasn’t a shock at all if you’ve been reading here. It was expected.</p><p><blockquote>周二股市看起来充满风险，尤其是科技股，<b><i>随着通胀不安情绪继续波及整个市场。该行业一直首当其冲，人们担心通胀上升可能会促使美联储提前结束COVID-19大流行推动的宽松立场。</i></b>在上周就业意外下滑之后，一些人感到担忧<b><i>周三的消费者价格数据也可能带来严重冲击。</i></b>市场在自身负荷下头重脚轻、紧张不安，如果仅仅相信美联储将被迫紧缩，市场就会崩溃。这就是为什么今天它像前震一样震动，但如果你一直在这里阅读，它根本不是一个冲击。这是意料之中的。</blockquote></p><p><b><i>Inflation is the “</i></b> <b>worst-case</b> <b><i>&nbsp;scenario” for this ticking-time-bomb market full of complacent investors,</i></b>&nbsp;warns our call of the day from Thomas H. Kee Jr., president and chief executive of Stock Traders Daily and portfolio manager at Equity Logic.And here’s the&nbsp;<i>key</i>:</p><p><blockquote><b><i>通货膨胀是“</i></b><b>最坏情况</b><b><i>情景”对于这个充满自满投资者的定时炸弹市场，</i></b>Stock Traders Daily总裁兼首席执行官兼Equity Logic投资组合经理Thomas H.Kee Jr.警告我们当天的看涨期权。这是<i>钥匙</i>：</blockquote></p><p>“Arguably, the ONLY reason stimulus has even been possible is because there has been no inflation.&nbsp; <b><i>If inflation comes back,</i></b> <b>all</b> <b><i>&nbsp;of the safeguards investors have been given (free money from stimulus) will be dissolved and won’t be</i></b> <b>able</b> <b><i>&nbsp;to come back to save the day</i></b>,” Kee told MarketWatch…. He said recent jobs data indeed suggest price rises will be “more serious than previously thought….”“The declines can be much worse than 25% and <b><i>&nbsp;if the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] is handcuffed because of inflation, the swift bounce back that investors have been used to will not happen</i></b>&nbsp;either,” said Kee. “The fair value multiple on the SPX SPX (^GSPC) is not 30 – [to] 35x. It’s more like 15x….”What would bring that down to earth is the return of natural-risk perceptions among investors — severely lacking right now. “They have been given free money by the government, stimulus programs are in full effect, and investors don’t perceive any risk at all. That is the most dangerous thing!” Kee said….“ <b><i>When the big buyer is not there … that is when natural perceptions of risk come back, and if that happens … watch out below!!</i></b>”You see, rising inflation has the power to cut the Fed off at the knees. The kind of inflation I’ve been writing about can suck the mojo right out of the Fed, and that is why Powell is already doing his best to convince financial markets that the Fed&nbsp;<i>wants</i>&nbsp;higher inflation and convince them that the higher inflation it wants is temporary before it even begins.</p><p><blockquote>“可以说，刺激措施成为可能的唯一原因是因为没有通货膨胀。<b><i>如果通胀卷土重来，</i></b><b>全部</b><b><i>投资者获得的保障措施（刺激计划中的免费资金）将被解散，而且不会</i></b><b>能干</b><b><i>回来拯救世界</i></b>，”Kee告诉MarketWatch……他表示，最近的就业数据确实表明价格上涨将“比之前想象的更严重……”“下降幅度可能比25%严重得多<b><i>如果FOMC（联邦公开市场委员会）因为通货膨胀而被束缚，投资者已经习惯的快速反弹将不会发生</i></b>基说。“SPX SPX(^GSPC)的公允价值倍数不是30-[至]35倍。更像是15倍……”让这一点变得现实的是投资者自然风险认知的回归——目前这种认知严重缺乏。“政府给了他们免费的钱，刺激计划全面生效，投资者根本没有察觉到任何风险。那是最危险的事情！”纪说……”<b><i>当大买家不在那里时…那就是对风险的自然感知回来的时候，如果发生这种情况…请注意下面！！</i></b>“你看，通胀上升有能力让美联储屈服。我一直在写的那种通胀可能会让美联储失去魔力，这就是为什么鲍威尔已经在尽最大努力让金融市场相信美联储<i>想要</i>更高的通胀，并让他们相信它想要的更高通胀在开始之前就是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p>Market susceptibility</p><p><blockquote>市场易感性</blockquote></p><p>Notes Lance Roberts,</p><p><blockquote>兰斯·罗伯茨指出，</blockquote></p><p></p><p><b><i>There is no way this bull market doesn’t end very badly. We all know that is the reality of this liquidity-fueled market,</i></b>&nbsp;but we keep investing for “Fear Of Missing Out.” <i>Seeking Alpha</i>How much does all that stimulus money from Fed and Feds pouring into the market create the cashflow that made the past year’s insanity possible?</p><p><blockquote><b><i>这次牛市不可能不以非常糟糕的方式结束。我们都知道这是这个流动性推动的市场的现实，</i></b>但我们继续投资是因为“害怕错过”。<i>寻求阿尔法</i>美联储和美联储涌入市场的所有刺激资金创造了多少现金流，使过去一年的疯狂成为可能？</blockquote></p><p>Over the past 5-MONTHS, more money has poured into the equity markets than in the last 12-YEARS combined.Do the math and ask yourself what happens if the money HAS to be turned off because inflation forces the Fed to stop creating to much new money in an environment of to few goods due to previous COVID-shutdown shortages and the continuing problems they’ve set up.</p><p><blockquote>过去5个月，涌入股市的资金比过去12年的总和还要多。算一算，问问你自己，如果货币不得不被关闭，会发生什么，因为通货膨胀迫使美联储停止在商品很少的环境中创造大量新货币，这是由于以前的COVID关闭短缺和他们已经建立的持续问题。</blockquote></p><p>And, if you don’t think the market is precariously riding high on easy money, look at how much it is rising on rising margin debt (money owed to brokers):</p><p><blockquote>而且，如果您不认为市场因宽松资金而不稳定地走高，请看看保证金债务（欠经纪人的钱）上升导致市场上涨了多少：</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ca87d635f36dfaa1c989d7e459550d1\" tg-width=\"914\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Seeking Alpha</i></p><p><blockquote><i>寻求阿尔法</i></blockquote></p><p>When the Fed is pressed hard to raise interest rates and stop printing money, brokers aren’t going to be so free in lending money. Right now, it’s easy money at almost free rates. More to the point, though, when the market does start coming down because of concerns about the Fed cutting off easy money, all that margin debt starts unwinding in a hurry as people are forced to sell assets and reduce their margin debt.</p><p><blockquote>当美联储面临加息和停止印钞的压力时，经纪人就不会如此自由地放贷了。现在，以几乎免费的利率轻松赚钱。然而，更重要的是，当市场因担心美联储切断宽松货币供应而开始下跌时，所有保证金债务都开始匆忙平仓，因为人们被迫出售资产并减少保证金债务。</blockquote></p><p>As you can also see, huge, rapid spikes like this in market debt tend to happen right before severe crashes:</p><p><blockquote>正如您还可以看到的，市场债务往往会在严重崩盘之前发生像这样的巨大、快速飙升：</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ff13864e0443e2a448952529cdf6e2c\" tg-width=\"758\" tg-height=\"511\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Seeking Alpha</i></p><p><blockquote><i>寻求阿尔法</i></blockquote></p><p>In the short term, fundamentals do not matter. However, in the long term, they matter a lot.Sentiment can cause investors to overlook economic fundamentals for a long time, but a sudden change in perception of fundamentals long overlooked in an environment of high margin debt and bring a rapid correction of one’s frame of reference.</p><p><blockquote>短期来看，基本面并不重要。然而，从长远来看，它们非常重要。情绪可能会导致投资者长期忽视经济基本面，但在高利润率债务的环境下，对长期被忽视的基本面看法的突然变化会带来人们的快速修正框架参考。</blockquote></p><p>Currently, investors are overlooking fundamentals on the expectation the economy and earnings will improve to justify the market overvaluation.That is not likely to happen. Even if it does, perception of the financial landscape (the core value of of money) has been far too optimistic in most circles, as seen by the shock today; but you could see this coming from a year away.</p><p><blockquote>目前，投资者忽视了经济和盈利将改善的基本面，以证明市场高估的合理性。这不太可能发生。即使是这样，大多数圈子对金融格局（货币的核心价值）的看法也过于乐观，正如今天的冲击所表明的那样；但你可以看到一年后的情况。</blockquote></p><p>The Fed talks as though it still doesn’t see what is coming, but that’s the same Fed that talked about how easy tightening was going to be. It appears it had no idea that it didn’t have an exit plan that wouldn’t send sentiment sharply south and crash the market. Yet, that, too, could be seen from years away by those who were not worshipping at the feet of Father Fed.</p><p><blockquote>美联储说得好像它仍然没有看到未来会发生什么，但这就是美联储谈论紧缩将是多么容易。它似乎不知道自己没有一个不会导致市场情绪急剧下降并导致市场崩溃的退出计划。然而，那些不在费德神父脚下敬拜的人，多年后也能看到这一点。</blockquote></p><p>When, or if, expectations of recovery are disappointed, the market will begin to reprice itself for its intrinsic value. Given that the market is currently trading more than twice the level of underlying economic growth, which is where corporate profits come from, such suggests a significant risk.That’s why the Dow fell 682 points (2%) today, and the S&amp;P fell 2.14% and the NASDAQ, 368 points (2.67%). There wasn’t much of a safe space to be found in stocks.</p><p><blockquote>当复苏预期落空时，市场将开始为其内在价值重新定价。鉴于市场目前的交易水平是潜在经济增长水平的两倍多，而潜在经济增长是企业利润的来源，这表明存在重大风险。这就是为什么道琼斯指数今天下跌682点（2%），标准普尔指数下跌2.14%，纳斯达克下跌368点（2.67%）。股票中没有太多安全的空间。</blockquote></p><p>Don’t tell me inflation doesn’t matter to this market. Worst day in six months. More on this in another Patron Post.</p><p><blockquote>别告诉我通货膨胀对这个市场无关紧要。六个月来最糟糕的一天。在另一个顾客帖子中会有更多的介绍。</blockquote></p><p>Now let me, once again, do the kind of corrective reporting I said was going to be essential at this time. First, the fake news:</p><p><blockquote>现在，让我再一次做我说过的在这个时候是必不可少的那种纠正性报告。一、假新闻：</blockquote></p><p>One big reason for the acceleration was&nbsp; <i>base effects</i>&nbsp;– at this time a year ago, the economy was hit with the worst of the Covid pandemic and inflation was unusually low.CNBCThat isn’t accurate. As I said in my last Patron Post, wherein I also laid out the statistical facts and source to back up my statement,</p><p><blockquote>加速的一个重要原因是<i>基础效应</i>-一年前的这个时候，经济受到了新冠疫情最严重的打击，通货膨胀率异常低。CNBC这并不准确。正如我在上一篇赞助人帖子中所说，我还列出了统计事实和来源来支持我的声明，</blockquote></p><p>Food prices and many other prices rose like they normally do last March, in spite of the pandemic. In fact, after March, they rose worse than normal with every month in the remainder of 2020 coming in between 3.5% and 4% on an annualized basis.“Inflation Tsunami Sirens Are Screaming!“I noted in particular one economist who said groceries and fuel were now just making up for last time:</p><p><blockquote>尽管发生了疫情，食品价格和许多其他价格仍像去年三月一样上涨。事实上，3月份之后，它们的涨幅比正常情况更糟糕，2020年剩余时间里每个月的年化涨幅都在3.5%至4%之间。“通胀海啸警报正在尖叫！”我特别注意到一位经济学家，他说食品杂货和燃料现在只是在弥补上次的损失：</blockquote></p><p>So,&nbsp; <i>like groceries,</i>&nbsp;gas is catching up to get back to where we would actually expect it to be….What predominantly happened last year was that&nbsp;<i>fuel</i>&nbsp;prices plummeted due to nothing being transported and lack of vacationing and lack of commuting, but&nbsp;<i>groceries</i>? Come on!</p><p><blockquote>所以，<i>比如食品杂货，</i>气体正在赶上回到我们实际预期的位置…去年主要发生的是<i>燃料</i>由于没有任何东西被运输，缺乏度假和通勤，价格暴跌，但<i>杂货</i>？来吧！</blockquote></p><p></p><p>“Catching up” may be true for gas if you look back to where prices were in 2018, but it’s total horse manure when you embrace groceries in the comment. Groceries have no catching up to do whatsoever. The average rate of inflation for food for all of 2020 was 3.4%, which compares to rates that 0.3%-2.5% for every year going back until 2011 where the average for the year was. 3.6%.And while overall inflation was less than normal for April through June last year, what does that have to do with this year? [Overall] prices still rose last year; so, it is NOT as if you are comparing to an anomalous year where overall prices fell in those months, meaning some of this year’s gain was just making up for last year’s unusual loss. Then you could truthfully say there was a base effect.<b><i>So, inflation is coming in much hotter than the Fed led people to believe; and, as my recent Patron Posts have laid out, there is plenty more inflation already baked in on the producer side that will certainly be passed through. I noted you could expect to see that starting to show up on the consumer side now, and you just did. It’s going to be an inflation-hot summer, which can sour sentiment, so stocks won’t take well to that. To be sure, there is a lot of testosterone still determined to press stocks up no matter what, but a hot and humid summer will zap that sentiment, as it did today; and it will keep zapping it no matter what the charts readers are prognosticating based on current sentimental trends. Trends can change quickly in the face of facts</i></b><b>if</b><b><i>&nbsp;the facts crash in with enough vigor. I think high inflation is the much-feared fact that can break through by stopping the Fed’s plans from moving forward.</i></b></p><p><blockquote>如果你回顾2018年的价格，汽油的“追赶”可能是真的，但当你在评论中接受杂货时，这完全是马粪。食品杂货没有什么可做的。2020年全年食品的平均通胀率为3.4%，相比之下，自2011年以来，每年的平均通胀率为0.3%-2.5%。3.6%。虽然去年4月至6月的整体通胀率低于正常水平，但这与今年有什么关系呢？【总体】去年物价仍上涨；因此，这并不是说你在与一个反常的年份进行比较，在这几个月里，整体价格下跌，这意味着今年的一些涨幅只是弥补了去年的反常损失。那么你就可以如实地说有一个基数效应。<b><i>因此，通货膨胀的到来比美联储让人们相信的要严重得多；而且，正如我最近的赞助人帖子所展示的那样，生产者方面已经酝酿了更多的通货膨胀，这肯定会被传递出去。我注意到你现在可以期待看到这一点开始出现在消费者方面，你也确实做到了。这将是一个通胀炎热的夏天，这可能会恶化市场情绪，因此股市不会很好地适应。可以肯定的是，无论如何，仍然有很多睾丸激素决心推高股市，但炎热潮湿的夏天将会摧毁这种情绪，就像今天一样；无论图表读者根据当前的情绪趋势做出什么预测，它都会继续波动。在事实面前，趋势会很快改变</i></b><b>如果</b><b><i>事实以足够的活力闯入。我认为高通胀是一个令人恐惧的事实，它可以通过阻止美联储计划的推进来突破。</i></b></blockquote></p><p>If the Fed does keep moving forward with the same kind of blind ignorance and stubborn resolve to prove itself right that led it to keep pursuing its economic tightening regime (as I claimed it would do for too long in 2018, contrary to good judgment), it will really be making things worse for itself and harder to tame. I think that is not unlikely.</p><p><blockquote>如果美联储真的继续带着同样的盲目无知和顽固的决心前进，以证明自己是正确的，这导致它继续推行经济紧缩制度（正如我在2018年声称的那样，这与良好的判断相反），它真的会让事情变得更糟，更难驯服。我认为这不是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p>“ <b><i>There are people who think the Fed is not just behind the curve, they’re maybe missing the point and by the time they start to play catch up, it’s too late,</i></b>” Wall Street veteran Art Cashin said WednesdayCNBCAs one economist noted,</p><p><blockquote>“<b><i>有些人认为美联储不仅仅落后于形势，他们可能没有抓住要点，当他们开始追赶时，已经太晚了，</i></b>华尔街资深人士Art Cashin周三表示CNBCAS的一位经济学家指出，</blockquote></p><p>“We doubt this report will change the view of officials that inflationary pressures are ‘largely transitory,‘” wrote Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.&nbsp; <b><i>“It’s just that there’s a</i></b> <b>lot more</b> <b><i>&nbsp;‘transitory’ than they were expecting.</i></b>”CNBCIndeed. A lot more. What will they do when they run out of a fake base effect to blame it on?</p><p><blockquote>凯投宏观(Capital Economics)美国高级经济学家迈克尔·皮尔斯(Michael Pearce)写道：“我们怀疑这份报告能否改变官员们的看法，即通胀压力‘很大程度上是暂时的’。”<b><i>“只是有一个</i></b><b>更多</b><b><i>比他们预期的“短暂”。</i></b>“CNBC确实如此。更多。当他们用完一个假的基础效应来指责它时，他们会怎么做？</blockquote></p><p>Liked it? Take a second to support David Haggith on Patreon!</p><p><blockquote>喜欢吗？花点时间在Patreon上支持大卫·哈吉斯！</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-12/inflation-will-kill-stock-market\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-12/inflation-will-kill-stock-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134419676","content_text":"I’m not saying nothing else can do the job before inflation fully gets here, just that the kind of inflation I’ve been writing about certainly will do it if nothing else does. That’s what terrifies the market and for a very good reason that may not be the first one that comes to some investors’ minds.Many talk about the “risk premium” of investing in stocks. As inflation rises, bond yields rise to offset what will be lost to inflation. As bond yields rise, stocks become less competitive.That’s a problem, but it’s not the big problem. Not this time.The big problem is that we all know where the money for stocks is coming from — the Federal reserve and the US government by borrowing and distributing the money the Fed prints. So, the big problem is the Fed.Fed is getting tangled in a mess of its own makingHaving made the case that high inflation is now already a given, it won’t be long before the Fed is caught in a trap where it needs to continue creating money in order to keep the market rising and to keep stimulating the economy, but it won’t be able to. That’s why we hear the Fed talking incessantly about how inflation is “transitory” right now. The Fed NEEDS to have all investors believe that the rapidly dawning period of inflation will be short so it can be ignored. The Fed needs the market to believe it CAN and WILL keep printing money.However, the Fed is just fooling itself. The longer it claims inflation is temporary so that it can ignore the rapidly rising numbers, the more inflation will move out of control because the Fed and the federal government keep the money printing and the armored cars for transporting it running around the clock. (Figuratively speaking, of course.)The Fed may fool itself to its (and our) longterm harm, but it is not likely to fool the market much longer because the numbers will be coming in too high for the market to ignore. We’ve saw that on Wednesday in how the market responded to news of the highest inflation in years — a number annualized at 4.2% in April, which is well below the level of inflation we’re about to see this summer. That’s just the wind-up for the pitch.How inflation will fight the Fed and winThe danger inflation imposes is that, if it rises as high as I am certain it is going to rise (double digits), then the Fed will be forced to raise its interest targets because the market will shove interest up regardless, making the Fed look dumb for claiming an interest target it cannot hold. The Fed won’t be able to what it takes to hold interest down without creating massively greater inflation through its creation of new money.However, it is not just that the bond vigilantes will wrest control of interest out of the Fed’s hands, it’s that the stock market will force the Fed to deal with inflation by fearing it whether the Fed says it should or not. Consumers will also press congress to press the Fed to deal with inflation. The longer it delays, the more massively the Fed will have to raise interest rates, just as Paul Volker did in the 80’s to get inflation under control.This conundrum is starting to materialize now at a time when the stock market is at absurdly perilous heights. Faint realizations of inflation are no longer so faint, which is why the market is running out of momentum. Investors are starting to believe the Fed will lose control of interest rates. Investors are starting to doubt the Fed’s words of confidence.Of course, to crash, momentum has to turn downward, and that won’t likely happen until the market is certain the Fed is going to lose control; but that can happen slowly at first and then quickly as it did in 2018.Inflation is a time bomb on the Fed’s back. My thesis is that every month now the Fed is going to find it harder and harder to maintain the illusion that it can keep creating money, pumping it into mom-and-pop investor hands (retail investors, the Robinhood crowed, etc.) through government stimulus programs (at the government’s demand) and keep trying to maintain low interest to pump money into the stock market via corporate stock buybacks funded on loans. Inflation will crush easy money. It rule. The Fed can rule over it, but only by taking away money and crashing markets that are utterly dependent on that money.The plate spinner is starting to lose control of all the plates it has to keep twirling on the ends of little sticks. Today’s action in the market shows the market is starting to pay attention to the clatter of falling plates as inflation shows up worse than investors feared. The real fear — the deep paralyzing fear that is only now being foreshadowed — is not competition from rising bond yields (certain as that is to come) but that inflation will become hot enough that the Fed will be forced to turn off all of its go juice.Inflation has the power to suddenly turn market sentiment on its head because, well, follow the money back to where it is coming from.Stocks headed sharply lower as inflation jitters percolated again, following a report showing U.S. inflation in the year to April rose at its fastest pace in about 13 years, amid the recovery from the COVID pandemic. MarketWatchInflation jitters will become inflation panic when it becomes clear that the rise to 4.2 is not just a blip but the first step on the consumer side of many steps to come. Hopefully none of my readers were paying much attention to economists who were forecasting a meager 3.6%.“Inflation destroys wealth. Period,” said Patrick Leary, head of trading at Incapital, in an interview with MarketWatch. “We see inflation showing up in markets. If it’s indeed transitory, markets can live with it.  But if it’s not transitory, that’s when it is going to become troubling for stocks.”The destruction of wealth is one concern, but the bigger concern, I believe, is the loss of the Amazon-scale, easy-money stream into the market. This is why the market went up when the jobs report was truly horrible. The report of slackening employment eased feelings of concern about inflation causing the Fed to turn off the flow. Its why the market plunged today on solid news to the contrary of higher inflation than many were expecting.The Fed’s hand may soon be forced by reality; and if you’ve been reading here — particularly the Patron Posts that focused intensively on inflation, you’ve had a good idea of what is coming. One won’t have to wait until the Fed tightens to stop inflation, however; one only has to wait until stock investors become convinced the Fed will have to tighten, regardless of what the Fed claims to assure investors it won’t.As MarketWatch noted yesterday,Tuesday is looking dicey for stocks, notably the technology space,  as inflation jitters continue to ripple across markets. The sector has been bearing the brunt of concerns that higher inflation may prompt an early end to the Federal Reserve’s COVID-19 pandemic-driven accommodative stance. After last week’s downside jobs surprise, some fear  Wednesday’s consumer price data could also deliver a nasty shock.The market is top-heavy and jittery under its own load to such an extent that it will crash if it merely believes the Fed will be forced to tighten. That’s why it jolted as a foreshock today, but it wasn’t a shock at all if you’ve been reading here. It was expected.Inflation is the “ worst-case  scenario” for this ticking-time-bomb market full of complacent investors, warns our call of the day from Thomas H. Kee Jr., president and chief executive of Stock Traders Daily and portfolio manager at Equity Logic.And here’s the key:“Arguably, the ONLY reason stimulus has even been possible is because there has been no inflation.  If inflation comes back, all  of the safeguards investors have been given (free money from stimulus) will be dissolved and won’t be able  to come back to save the day,” Kee told MarketWatch…. He said recent jobs data indeed suggest price rises will be “more serious than previously thought….”“The declines can be much worse than 25% and  if the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] is handcuffed because of inflation, the swift bounce back that investors have been used to will not happen either,” said Kee. “The fair value multiple on the SPX SPX (^GSPC) is not 30 – [to] 35x. It’s more like 15x….”What would bring that down to earth is the return of natural-risk perceptions among investors — severely lacking right now. “They have been given free money by the government, stimulus programs are in full effect, and investors don’t perceive any risk at all. That is the most dangerous thing!” Kee said….“ When the big buyer is not there … that is when natural perceptions of risk come back, and if that happens … watch out below!!”You see, rising inflation has the power to cut the Fed off at the knees. The kind of inflation I’ve been writing about can suck the mojo right out of the Fed, and that is why Powell is already doing his best to convince financial markets that the Fed wants higher inflation and convince them that the higher inflation it wants is temporary before it even begins.Market susceptibilityNotes Lance Roberts,There is no way this bull market doesn’t end very badly. We all know that is the reality of this liquidity-fueled market, but we keep investing for “Fear Of Missing Out.” Seeking AlphaHow much does all that stimulus money from Fed and Feds pouring into the market create the cashflow that made the past year’s insanity possible?Over the past 5-MONTHS, more money has poured into the equity markets than in the last 12-YEARS combined.Do the math and ask yourself what happens if the money HAS to be turned off because inflation forces the Fed to stop creating to much new money in an environment of to few goods due to previous COVID-shutdown shortages and the continuing problems they’ve set up.And, if you don’t think the market is precariously riding high on easy money, look at how much it is rising on rising margin debt (money owed to brokers):Seeking AlphaWhen the Fed is pressed hard to raise interest rates and stop printing money, brokers aren’t going to be so free in lending money. Right now, it’s easy money at almost free rates. More to the point, though, when the market does start coming down because of concerns about the Fed cutting off easy money, all that margin debt starts unwinding in a hurry as people are forced to sell assets and reduce their margin debt.As you can also see, huge, rapid spikes like this in market debt tend to happen right before severe crashes:Seeking AlphaIn the short term, fundamentals do not matter. However, in the long term, they matter a lot.Sentiment can cause investors to overlook economic fundamentals for a long time, but a sudden change in perception of fundamentals long overlooked in an environment of high margin debt and bring a rapid correction of one’s frame of reference.Currently, investors are overlooking fundamentals on the expectation the economy and earnings will improve to justify the market overvaluation.That is not likely to happen. Even if it does, perception of the financial landscape (the core value of of money) has been far too optimistic in most circles, as seen by the shock today; but you could see this coming from a year away.The Fed talks as though it still doesn’t see what is coming, but that’s the same Fed that talked about how easy tightening was going to be. It appears it had no idea that it didn’t have an exit plan that wouldn’t send sentiment sharply south and crash the market. Yet, that, too, could be seen from years away by those who were not worshipping at the feet of Father Fed.When, or if, expectations of recovery are disappointed, the market will begin to reprice itself for its intrinsic value. Given that the market is currently trading more than twice the level of underlying economic growth, which is where corporate profits come from, such suggests a significant risk.That’s why the Dow fell 682 points (2%) today, and the S&P fell 2.14% and the NASDAQ, 368 points (2.67%). There wasn’t much of a safe space to be found in stocks.Don’t tell me inflation doesn’t matter to this market. Worst day in six months. More on this in another Patron Post.Now let me, once again, do the kind of corrective reporting I said was going to be essential at this time. First, the fake news:One big reason for the acceleration was  base effects – at this time a year ago, the economy was hit with the worst of the Covid pandemic and inflation was unusually low.CNBCThat isn’t accurate. As I said in my last Patron Post, wherein I also laid out the statistical facts and source to back up my statement,Food prices and many other prices rose like they normally do last March, in spite of the pandemic. In fact, after March, they rose worse than normal with every month in the remainder of 2020 coming in between 3.5% and 4% on an annualized basis.“Inflation Tsunami Sirens Are Screaming!“I noted in particular one economist who said groceries and fuel were now just making up for last time:So,  like groceries, gas is catching up to get back to where we would actually expect it to be….What predominantly happened last year was that fuel prices plummeted due to nothing being transported and lack of vacationing and lack of commuting, but groceries? Come on!“Catching up” may be true for gas if you look back to where prices were in 2018, but it’s total horse manure when you embrace groceries in the comment. Groceries have no catching up to do whatsoever. The average rate of inflation for food for all of 2020 was 3.4%, which compares to rates that 0.3%-2.5% for every year going back until 2011 where the average for the year was. 3.6%.And while overall inflation was less than normal for April through June last year, what does that have to do with this year? [Overall] prices still rose last year; so, it is NOT as if you are comparing to an anomalous year where overall prices fell in those months, meaning some of this year’s gain was just making up for last year’s unusual loss. Then you could truthfully say there was a base effect.So, inflation is coming in much hotter than the Fed led people to believe; and, as my recent Patron Posts have laid out, there is plenty more inflation already baked in on the producer side that will certainly be passed through. I noted you could expect to see that starting to show up on the consumer side now, and you just did. It’s going to be an inflation-hot summer, which can sour sentiment, so stocks won’t take well to that. To be sure, there is a lot of testosterone still determined to press stocks up no matter what, but a hot and humid summer will zap that sentiment, as it did today; and it will keep zapping it no matter what the charts readers are prognosticating based on current sentimental trends. Trends can change quickly in the face of factsif the facts crash in with enough vigor. I think high inflation is the much-feared fact that can break through by stopping the Fed’s plans from moving forward.If the Fed does keep moving forward with the same kind of blind ignorance and stubborn resolve to prove itself right that led it to keep pursuing its economic tightening regime (as I claimed it would do for too long in 2018, contrary to good judgment), it will really be making things worse for itself and harder to tame. I think that is not unlikely.“ There are people who think the Fed is not just behind the curve, they’re maybe missing the point and by the time they start to play catch up, it’s too late,” Wall Street veteran Art Cashin said WednesdayCNBCAs one economist noted,“We doubt this report will change the view of officials that inflationary pressures are ‘largely transitory,‘” wrote Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.  “It’s just that there’s a lot more  ‘transitory’ than they were expecting.”CNBCIndeed. A lot more. What will they do when they run out of a fake base effect to blame it on?Liked it? Take a second to support David Haggith on Patreon!","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":620,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}