+关注
CherylNg
暂无个人介绍
IP属地：未知
8
关注
0
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
CherylNg
2021-05-12
Wow
抱歉，原内容已删除
CherylNg
2021-05-12
Wow
ARKK Gamma & What's Really Behind The QQQrash?<blockquote>ARKK伽马&QQQrash背后的真正原因是什么？</blockquote>
CherylNg
2021-05-03
Wow
Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>
CherylNg
2021-04-22
Wow
抱歉，原内容已删除
CherylNg
2021-03-12
Tiger
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577235917796406","uuid":"3577235917796406","gmtCreate":1614141894518,"gmtModify":1615515371674,"name":"CherylNg","pinyin":"cherylng","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":8,"tweetSize":5,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.57%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":193343597,"gmtCreate":1620771572619,"gmtModify":1634196540859,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193343597","repostId":"1123134935","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2348,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193343312,"gmtCreate":1620771550036,"gmtModify":1634196541337,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193343312","repostId":"1138008630","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138008630","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620745704,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138008630?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-11 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"ARKK Gamma & What's Really Behind The QQQrash?<blockquote>ARKK伽马&QQQrash背后的真正原因是什么？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138008630","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showedenormous sell pressure all day in NQ futsacross all lots ","content":"<p>Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showed<b>enormous sell pressure all day in NQ futs</b>across all lots sizes (the largest in at least 1m), but<b>particularly in our medium- and large- lot buckets, proxies for large HFs and Asset Managers aggressively selling / shorting...</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券的“期货失衡”监测显示<b>NQ期货全天面临巨大抛售压力</b>跨所有批次大小（最大的至少1m），但是<b>特别是在我们的中批量和大批量桶中，大型HF和资产管理公司的代理人积极抛售/做空...</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b11c4266aecb4fc29b97f106da799c5\" tg-width=\"1248\" tg-height=\"600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Two things were behind the QQQcrash - ARKK's vicious circle and CTA Deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>QQQcrash背后有两件事——ARKK的恶性循环和CTA去杠杆化。</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's Charlie McElligott warns that the monstrous ~$20B ARKK active ETF is getting absolutely<b>torched in recent weeks amid a negative feedback loop from the mega-high growth / high multiple / “unprofitable” single-names.</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券(Nomura)的Charlie McElligott警告称，高达$20B的ARKK active ETF绝对会<b>最近几周，在超高增长/高倍数/“无利可图”的单一名称的负反馈循环中被烧毁。</b></blockquote></p><p> Critically, he explains,<b>the ETF itself now acting “shadow leverage” pressuring this selloff,</b>especially with their dubious risk management practice of heavily concentrated positioning into what are extraordinarily illiquid names.</p><p><blockquote>至关重要的是，他解释说，<b>ETF本身现在充当“影子杠杆”，给这次抛售带来压力，</b>尤其是他们可疑的风险管理实践，即严重集中投资于流动性极差的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Along with the inherently-extreme interest rate sensitivity within these hyper-growth / high-valuation names, this has made ARKK a popular downside play / hedge in the options space, with Dealers essentially max “short Gamma” near this current $98-100 level, while net Delta across options is ~ $-2B and essentially the low net Delta reading since start 2020.</p><p><blockquote>加上这些高速增长/高估值名称固有的极端利率敏感性，这使得ARKK成为期权领域受欢迎的下行投资/对冲工具，交易商基本上在当前98-100美元附近最大“空头伽马”水平，而期权的净Delta约为-2B美元，基本上是自2020年初以来的最低净Delta读数。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3eb7d728c70027833b43afaaa862ecc\" tg-width=\"716\" tg-height=\"383\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> But that is not the only driver of the chaos as<b>the Nomura QIS CTA Trend model showed massive deleveraging in Nasdaq yesterday into the down move</b>after the 3m window “sell trigger” was breached and flipped “short” (now joining the 2w and 1m windows as “short,” although neither of those has any signal loading), which overall turned the multi-year legacy “+100% Long” signal across all horizons down to just “+4.1% Long,” and implying ~$10.7B of notional selling in NQ futs in the deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>但这并不是混乱的唯一驱动因素<b>野村QIS CTA趋势模型显示，纳斯达克昨天大规模去杠杆化进入下行走势</b>在3m窗口“卖出触发器”被突破并翻转为“空头”（现在加入2w和1m窗口为“空头”，尽管这两个窗口都没有任何信号加载）之后，这总体上将多年传统的“+100%多头”信号下调至仅“+4.1%多头”，这意味着去杠杆化过程中NQ期货的名义抛售量约为107亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>And that was exaggerated from a “flows” perspective by the previously warned-about deep Dealer “short Gamma vs spot” in QQQs</b>we highlighted in recent notes as the center of Equities risk, which meant “accelerant” (delta hedging) flows into the selloff, with a now extremely negative $Gamma reading -$673mm (1.5%ile), while net Delta exploded lower to -$20B (1.6%ile).</p><p><blockquote><b>从“流量”的角度来看，这被之前警告的深度交易商“空头伽马vs现货”夸大了</b>我们在最近的报告中强调了股票风险的中心，这意味着“助推器”（Delta对冲）流入抛售，目前$Gamma读数为极端负值-6.73亿美元（1.5%ile），而净Delta则大幅下降至-$20B（1.6%ile）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/152632ec316a19852871d7bb0082d743\" tg-width=\"992\" tg-height=\"611\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> And Small Caps suffered the same as<b>IWM options too showing Dealers DEEP “short Gamma vs spot”</b>still (flips way up at 226.68) and overall $Gamma -206mm (18%ile), while $Delta is -$8.9B (9.3%ile) and negative until 227.34.</p><p><blockquote>小盘股遭受的损失与<b>IWM期权也向经销商显示深度“空头伽马与现货”</b>仍然（大幅上涨至226.68），总体$gamma-206mm（18%ile），而$Delta为-$89亿（9.3%ile），直到227.34为负。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/471db617d1ea1d81df7cfc6d0ec0280f\" tg-width=\"977\" tg-height=\"604\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The question - amid this morning's panic-bid in IWM and QQQ - is it over?</p><p><blockquote>问题是——在今天早上IWM和QQQ的恐慌性竞标中——结束了吗？</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6eaed5fb984ef5034fce79dc93442c5\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"808\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> We suspect no, as that ARKK Gamma vicious circle doesn't appear to be disappearing anytime soon.</p><p><blockquote>我们怀疑不会，因为ARKK伽马恶性循环似乎不会很快消失。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dramatic rebound this morning is explained by just how much more “skew” there is in the QQQ model.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>今天早上的戏剧性反弹可以用QQQ模型中有多少“偏差”来解释。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc561407c4bc89a8f4ffe08e23f292ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As SpotGamma explains,this supports that view of much larger volatility, both in dealers selling as Nasdaq moves lower and buying if Nasdaq rises.</p><p><blockquote>正如SpotGamma解释的那样，这支持了波动性更大的观点，交易商在纳斯达克走低时卖出，在纳斯达克上涨时买入。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ARKK Gamma & What's Really Behind The QQQrash?<blockquote>ARKK伽马&QQQrash背后的真正原因是什么？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nARKK Gamma & What's Really Behind The QQQrash?<blockquote>ARKK伽马&QQQrash背后的真正原因是什么？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-11 23:08</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showed<b>enormous sell pressure all day in NQ futs</b>across all lots sizes (the largest in at least 1m), but<b>particularly in our medium- and large- lot buckets, proxies for large HFs and Asset Managers aggressively selling / shorting...</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券的“期货失衡”监测显示<b>NQ期货全天面临巨大抛售压力</b>跨所有批次大小（最大的至少1m），但是<b>特别是在我们的中批量和大批量桶中，大型HF和资产管理公司的代理人积极抛售/做空...</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b11c4266aecb4fc29b97f106da799c5\" tg-width=\"1248\" tg-height=\"600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Two things were behind the QQQcrash - ARKK's vicious circle and CTA Deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>QQQcrash背后有两件事——ARKK的恶性循环和CTA去杠杆化。</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's Charlie McElligott warns that the monstrous ~$20B ARKK active ETF is getting absolutely<b>torched in recent weeks amid a negative feedback loop from the mega-high growth / high multiple / “unprofitable” single-names.</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券(Nomura)的Charlie McElligott警告称，高达$20B的ARKK active ETF绝对会<b>最近几周，在超高增长/高倍数/“无利可图”的单一名称的负反馈循环中被烧毁。</b></blockquote></p><p> Critically, he explains,<b>the ETF itself now acting “shadow leverage” pressuring this selloff,</b>especially with their dubious risk management practice of heavily concentrated positioning into what are extraordinarily illiquid names.</p><p><blockquote>至关重要的是，他解释说，<b>ETF本身现在充当“影子杠杆”，给这次抛售带来压力，</b>尤其是他们可疑的风险管理实践，即严重集中投资于流动性极差的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Along with the inherently-extreme interest rate sensitivity within these hyper-growth / high-valuation names, this has made ARKK a popular downside play / hedge in the options space, with Dealers essentially max “short Gamma” near this current $98-100 level, while net Delta across options is ~ $-2B and essentially the low net Delta reading since start 2020.</p><p><blockquote>加上这些高速增长/高估值名称固有的极端利率敏感性，这使得ARKK成为期权领域受欢迎的下行投资/对冲工具，交易商基本上在当前98-100美元附近最大“空头伽马”水平，而期权的净Delta约为-2B美元，基本上是自2020年初以来的最低净Delta读数。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3eb7d728c70027833b43afaaa862ecc\" tg-width=\"716\" tg-height=\"383\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> But that is not the only driver of the chaos as<b>the Nomura QIS CTA Trend model showed massive deleveraging in Nasdaq yesterday into the down move</b>after the 3m window “sell trigger” was breached and flipped “short” (now joining the 2w and 1m windows as “short,” although neither of those has any signal loading), which overall turned the multi-year legacy “+100% Long” signal across all horizons down to just “+4.1% Long,” and implying ~$10.7B of notional selling in NQ futs in the deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>但这并不是混乱的唯一驱动因素<b>野村QIS CTA趋势模型显示，纳斯达克昨天大规模去杠杆化进入下行走势</b>在3m窗口“卖出触发器”被突破并翻转为“空头”（现在加入2w和1m窗口为“空头”，尽管这两个窗口都没有任何信号加载）之后，这总体上将多年传统的“+100%多头”信号下调至仅“+4.1%多头”，这意味着去杠杆化过程中NQ期货的名义抛售量约为107亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>And that was exaggerated from a “flows” perspective by the previously warned-about deep Dealer “short Gamma vs spot” in QQQs</b>we highlighted in recent notes as the center of Equities risk, which meant “accelerant” (delta hedging) flows into the selloff, with a now extremely negative $Gamma reading -$673mm (1.5%ile), while net Delta exploded lower to -$20B (1.6%ile).</p><p><blockquote><b>从“流量”的角度来看，这被之前警告的深度交易商“空头伽马vs现货”夸大了</b>我们在最近的报告中强调了股票风险的中心，这意味着“助推器”（Delta对冲）流入抛售，目前$Gamma读数为极端负值-6.73亿美元（1.5%ile），而净Delta则大幅下降至-$20B（1.6%ile）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/152632ec316a19852871d7bb0082d743\" tg-width=\"992\" tg-height=\"611\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> And Small Caps suffered the same as<b>IWM options too showing Dealers DEEP “short Gamma vs spot”</b>still (flips way up at 226.68) and overall $Gamma -206mm (18%ile), while $Delta is -$8.9B (9.3%ile) and negative until 227.34.</p><p><blockquote>小盘股遭受的损失与<b>IWM期权也向经销商显示深度“空头伽马与现货”</b>仍然（大幅上涨至226.68），总体$gamma-206mm（18%ile），而$Delta为-$89亿（9.3%ile），直到227.34为负。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/471db617d1ea1d81df7cfc6d0ec0280f\" tg-width=\"977\" tg-height=\"604\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The question - amid this morning's panic-bid in IWM and QQQ - is it over?</p><p><blockquote>问题是——在今天早上IWM和QQQ的恐慌性竞标中——结束了吗？</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6eaed5fb984ef5034fce79dc93442c5\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"808\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> We suspect no, as that ARKK Gamma vicious circle doesn't appear to be disappearing anytime soon.</p><p><blockquote>我们怀疑不会，因为ARKK伽马恶性循环似乎不会很快消失。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dramatic rebound this morning is explained by just how much more “skew” there is in the QQQ model.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>今天早上的戏剧性反弹可以用QQQ模型中有多少“偏差”来解释。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc561407c4bc89a8f4ffe08e23f292ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As SpotGamma explains,this supports that view of much larger volatility, both in dealers selling as Nasdaq moves lower and buying if Nasdaq rises.</p><p><blockquote>正如SpotGamma解释的那样，这支持了波动性更大的观点，交易商在纳斯达克走低时卖出，在纳斯达克上涨时买入。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/arkk-gamma-whats-really-behind-qqqrash\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/arkk-gamma-whats-really-behind-qqqrash","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138008630","content_text":"Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showedenormous sell pressure all day in NQ futsacross all lots sizes (the largest in at least 1m), butparticularly in our medium- and large- lot buckets, proxies for large HFs and Asset Managers aggressively selling / shorting...\nTwo things were behind the QQQcrash - ARKK's vicious circle and CTA Deleveraging.\nNomura's Charlie McElligott warns that the monstrous ~$20B ARKK active ETF is getting absolutelytorched in recent weeks amid a negative feedback loop from the mega-high growth / high multiple / “unprofitable” single-names.\nCritically, he explains,the ETF itself now acting “shadow leverage” pressuring this selloff,especially with their dubious risk management practice of heavily concentrated positioning into what are extraordinarily illiquid names.\nAlong with the inherently-extreme interest rate sensitivity within these hyper-growth / high-valuation names, this has made ARKK a popular downside play / hedge in the options space, with Dealers essentially max “short Gamma” near this current $98-100 level, while net Delta across options is ~ $-2B and essentially the low net Delta reading since start 2020.\n\nBut that is not the only driver of the chaos asthe Nomura QIS CTA Trend model showed massive deleveraging in Nasdaq yesterday into the down moveafter the 3m window “sell trigger” was breached and flipped “short” (now joining the 2w and 1m windows as “short,” although neither of those has any signal loading), which overall turned the multi-year legacy “+100% Long” signal across all horizons down to just “+4.1% Long,” and implying ~$10.7B of notional selling in NQ futs in the deleveraging.\nAnd that was exaggerated from a “flows” perspective by the previously warned-about deep Dealer “short Gamma vs spot” in QQQswe highlighted in recent notes as the center of Equities risk, which meant “accelerant” (delta hedging) flows into the selloff, with a now extremely negative $Gamma reading -$673mm (1.5%ile), while net Delta exploded lower to -$20B (1.6%ile).\n\nAnd Small Caps suffered the same asIWM options too showing Dealers DEEP “short Gamma vs spot”still (flips way up at 226.68) and overall $Gamma -206mm (18%ile), while $Delta is -$8.9B (9.3%ile) and negative until 227.34.\n\nThe question - amid this morning's panic-bid in IWM and QQQ - is it over?\n\nWe suspect no, as that ARKK Gamma vicious circle doesn't appear to be disappearing anytime soon.\nThe dramatic rebound this morning is explained by just how much more “skew” there is in the QQQ model.\n\nAs SpotGamma explains,this supports that view of much larger volatility, both in dealers selling as Nasdaq moves lower and buying if Nasdaq rises.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ARKK":0.9,"QQQ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2136,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":108357750,"gmtCreate":1620002001570,"gmtModify":1634208674582,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow ","listText":"Wow ","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/108357750","repostId":"1105099718","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105099718","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619897946,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1105099718?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-02 03:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105099718","media":"WSJ","summary":"Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate. Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’sBerkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK.B-0.95%. California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive. While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are","content":"<p>Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate</p><p><blockquote>机构股东正在敦促这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团在气候和治理方面进行变革</blockquote></p><p>Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’s<u>Berkshire Hathaway</u> Inc.BRK.B -0.95%</p><p><blockquote>专业基金经理正在加大对沃伦·巴菲特的压力<u>伯克希尔哈撒韦</u>公司BRK.B-0.95%</blockquote></p><p>California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dd969e4b237144cd02112f41464d169\" tg-width=\"824\" tg-height=\"1396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote>加州公共雇员退休系统和路博迈要求这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团引入新董事，并提供更多有关气候风险和高管的信息</blockquote></p><p>Leading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.</p><p><blockquote>在周六伯克希尔年会之前，代理顾问Glass Lewis&Co.和Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.建议投资者保留对董事会成员的投票。</blockquote></p><p>While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.</p><p><blockquote>尽管许多投诉并不新鲜，股东提案也不太可能获得通过，但在投资者对企业可持续发展问题的兴趣日益浓厚的情况下，伯克希尔近年来低迷的回报使其更容易受到批评。</blockquote></p><p>The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging as<u>a key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money</u>.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，股东就气候变化、社会进步和治理问题向公司施压的运动继续升温，并成为<u>基金经理努力留住客户资金的一个关键卖点</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,<u>the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020</u>, outperforming the S&P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.</p><p><blockquote>在巴菲特先生的领导下，<u>该公司拥有1965年至2020年20%的复合年化收益</u>，跑赢标普500期内含股息10.2%的涨幅。伯克希尔过去三年和五年的总回报率分别为12%和14%，而该指数的总回报率为19%和18%。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers公司治理主管Simiso Nzima表示：“伯克希尔获得通过的部分原因是其历史上强劲的财务业绩。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built up<u>a diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades</u>, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司继续强调其对长期发展的持续关注。巴菲特先生是该公司的首席执行官兼董事长，他建立了<u>主要由美国企业和投资组成的多元化投资组合，预计将持续数十年</u>，而不是与由蓬勃发展的科技股提振的波动市场竞争。</blockquote></p><p>Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>拥有4440亿美元资产的美国最大公共养老基金Calpers共同发起了一项股东提案，恳求伯克希尔提供更多有关气候相关风险和机遇的信息。</blockquote></p><p>The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.</p><p><blockquote>该养老基金还拒绝投票连任董事会审计和治理委员会成员，理由是未能满足股东对气候风险披露的要求。该公司表示，担心董事会缺乏新成员，不与股东接触，也不让投资者对高管薪酬计划进行投票。</blockquote></p><p>“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果不更新董事会，下一代董事就无法在长期任职的董事离开董事会之前向他们学习，”恩齐马先生说。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔拒绝在公司周六会议前发表评论。</blockquote></p><p>Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.</p><p><blockquote>拥有超过4290亿美元资产的私人基金管理公司Neuberger也表示，将投票支持几项与环境、社会和公司治理问题（通常缩写为ESG）相关的股东主导的提案。</blockquote></p><p>“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”</p><p><blockquote>跟踪该公司的路博迈分析师米歇尔·佐丹奴(Michelle Giordano)表示：“人们可能会认为，如果公司有责任保护环境或在社会问题和治理方面提供良好服务，那么伯克希尔可能会成为这些领域的领导者。”“但好像不是。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already produces<u>a sustainability report</u>.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔在其年度委托书中表示，虽然它同意公司有责任管理气候风险，但它更愿意让其各个运营部门致力于自己的环境政策。该公司写道，小型公司办公室的授权将侵犯帮助这些企业在伯克希尔旗下蓬勃发展的自主权。例如，伯克希尔哈撒韦能源公司已经生产<u>可持续发展报告</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers还承诺支持一项提案，要求该公司报告其员工多元化的努力。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔表示，多元化报告提案不恰当地暗示“伯克希尔60多家运营业务中的每一家都有一种标准化技术来解决多元化、公平性和包容性问题。”</blockquote></p><p>“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔写道：“为了比较不同地理位置的此类不同业务而要求统一的定量报告是不合理的。”</blockquote></p><p>Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis和ISS建议股东投票支持ESG提案，并对某些董事弃权。</blockquote></p><p>“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis ESG研究高级总监Courteney Keatinge表示：“今年主流投资者对ESG问题给予了更多关注。”</blockquote></p><p>Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.</p><p><blockquote>另一个因素在起作用：伯克希尔的股票正在慢慢易手。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.</p><p><blockquote>乔治华盛顿大学法学教授劳伦斯·坎宁安(Lawrence Cunningham)撰写了大量有关该公司的文章，他表示，随着时间的推移，巴菲特减持该公司股份的长期计划已将更多伯克希尔股票转移到大型机构投资者手中。</blockquote></p><p>About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示，伯克希尔约70%的股票由个人持有，其中许多人是忠于巴菲特的长期持有者。许多人并不关心伯克希尔是否缺乏企业可持续发展报告或随时准备回答他们问题的投资者关系团队。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”</p><p><blockquote>巴菲特在最近致股东的信中写道：“伯克希尔不同寻常且有价值的个人股东家族可能会加深您对我们不愿讨好华尔街分析师和机构投资者的理解。”“我们已经拥有了我们想要的投资者，总的来说，我认为他们不会通过替代者来升级。”</blockquote></p><p>The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters. When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>不过，机构持股比例的逐步上升可能已经让职业经理人有能力在治理问题上向伯克希尔施压。坎宁安说，当巴菲特和他的遗产出售剩余股份时，这些基金经理很可能会持有该公司更多的股份。</blockquote></p><p>“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示：“重大领导力和结构性变革将会出现，这些持有者正在为这场战斗做准备。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">WSJ</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-02 03:39</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate</p><p><blockquote>机构股东正在敦促这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团在气候和治理方面进行变革</blockquote></p><p>Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’s<u>Berkshire Hathaway</u> Inc.BRK.B -0.95%</p><p><blockquote>专业基金经理正在加大对沃伦·巴菲特的压力<u>伯克希尔哈撒韦</u>公司BRK.B-0.95%</blockquote></p><p>California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dd969e4b237144cd02112f41464d169\" tg-width=\"824\" tg-height=\"1396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote>加州公共雇员退休系统和路博迈要求这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团引入新董事，并提供更多有关气候风险和高管的信息</blockquote></p><p>Leading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.</p><p><blockquote>在周六伯克希尔年会之前，代理顾问Glass Lewis&Co.和Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.建议投资者保留对董事会成员的投票。</blockquote></p><p>While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.</p><p><blockquote>尽管许多投诉并不新鲜，股东提案也不太可能获得通过，但在投资者对企业可持续发展问题的兴趣日益浓厚的情况下，伯克希尔近年来低迷的回报使其更容易受到批评。</blockquote></p><p>The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging as<u>a key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money</u>.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，股东就气候变化、社会进步和治理问题向公司施压的运动继续升温，并成为<u>基金经理努力留住客户资金的一个关键卖点</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,<u>the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020</u>, outperforming the S&P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.</p><p><blockquote>在巴菲特先生的领导下，<u>该公司拥有1965年至2020年20%的复合年化收益</u>，跑赢标普500期内含股息10.2%的涨幅。伯克希尔过去三年和五年的总回报率分别为12%和14%，而该指数的总回报率为19%和18%。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers公司治理主管Simiso Nzima表示：“伯克希尔获得通过的部分原因是其历史上强劲的财务业绩。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built up<u>a diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades</u>, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司继续强调其对长期发展的持续关注。巴菲特先生是该公司的首席执行官兼董事长，他建立了<u>主要由美国企业和投资组成的多元化投资组合，预计将持续数十年</u>，而不是与由蓬勃发展的科技股提振的波动市场竞争。</blockquote></p><p>Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>拥有4440亿美元资产的美国最大公共养老基金Calpers共同发起了一项股东提案，恳求伯克希尔提供更多有关气候相关风险和机遇的信息。</blockquote></p><p>The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.</p><p><blockquote>该养老基金还拒绝投票连任董事会审计和治理委员会成员，理由是未能满足股东对气候风险披露的要求。该公司表示，担心董事会缺乏新成员，不与股东接触，也不让投资者对高管薪酬计划进行投票。</blockquote></p><p>“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果不更新董事会，下一代董事就无法在长期任职的董事离开董事会之前向他们学习，”恩齐马先生说。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔拒绝在公司周六会议前发表评论。</blockquote></p><p>Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.</p><p><blockquote>拥有超过4290亿美元资产的私人基金管理公司Neuberger也表示，将投票支持几项与环境、社会和公司治理问题（通常缩写为ESG）相关的股东主导的提案。</blockquote></p><p>“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”</p><p><blockquote>跟踪该公司的路博迈分析师米歇尔·佐丹奴(Michelle Giordano)表示：“人们可能会认为，如果公司有责任保护环境或在社会问题和治理方面提供良好服务，那么伯克希尔可能会成为这些领域的领导者。”“但好像不是。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already produces<u>a sustainability report</u>.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔在其年度委托书中表示，虽然它同意公司有责任管理气候风险，但它更愿意让其各个运营部门致力于自己的环境政策。该公司写道，小型公司办公室的授权将侵犯帮助这些企业在伯克希尔旗下蓬勃发展的自主权。例如，伯克希尔哈撒韦能源公司已经生产<u>可持续发展报告</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers还承诺支持一项提案，要求该公司报告其员工多元化的努力。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔表示，多元化报告提案不恰当地暗示“伯克希尔60多家运营业务中的每一家都有一种标准化技术来解决多元化、公平性和包容性问题。”</blockquote></p><p>“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔写道：“为了比较不同地理位置的此类不同业务而要求统一的定量报告是不合理的。”</blockquote></p><p>Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis和ISS建议股东投票支持ESG提案，并对某些董事弃权。</blockquote></p><p>“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis ESG研究高级总监Courteney Keatinge表示：“今年主流投资者对ESG问题给予了更多关注。”</blockquote></p><p>Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.</p><p><blockquote>另一个因素在起作用：伯克希尔的股票正在慢慢易手。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.</p><p><blockquote>乔治华盛顿大学法学教授劳伦斯·坎宁安(Lawrence Cunningham)撰写了大量有关该公司的文章，他表示，随着时间的推移，巴菲特减持该公司股份的长期计划已将更多伯克希尔股票转移到大型机构投资者手中。</blockquote></p><p>About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示，伯克希尔约70%的股票由个人持有，其中许多人是忠于巴菲特的长期持有者。许多人并不关心伯克希尔是否缺乏企业可持续发展报告或随时准备回答他们问题的投资者关系团队。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”</p><p><blockquote>巴菲特在最近致股东的信中写道：“伯克希尔不同寻常且有价值的个人股东家族可能会加深您对我们不愿讨好华尔街分析师和机构投资者的理解。”“我们已经拥有了我们想要的投资者，总的来说，我认为他们不会通过替代者来升级。”</blockquote></p><p>The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters. When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>不过，机构持股比例的逐步上升可能已经让职业经理人有能力在治理问题上向伯克希尔施压。坎宁安说，当巴菲特和他的遗产出售剩余股份时，这些基金经理很可能会持有该公司更多的股份。</blockquote></p><p>“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示：“重大领导力和结构性变革将会出现，这些持有者正在为这场战斗做准备。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/warren-buffett-faces-impatient-investors-as-berkshire-hathaway-returns-decline-11619794480\">WSJ</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/daaa666333c3b9bf0b940ffed4c1c369","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/warren-buffett-faces-impatient-investors-as-berkshire-hathaway-returns-decline-11619794480","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105099718","content_text":"Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerateProfessional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’sBerkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK.B -0.95%California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executiveLeading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging asa key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money.Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020, outperforming the S&P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built upa diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already producesa sustainability report.Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters. When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BRK.B":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2128,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376130650,"gmtCreate":1619096317770,"gmtModify":1634288608846,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/376130650","repostId":"1123306589","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1332,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328832388,"gmtCreate":1615511045044,"gmtModify":1703490189102,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tiger ","listText":"Tiger ","text":"Tiger","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6625a4282444cb175152ec4e35e49ed9","width":"750","height":"1708"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328832388","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2787,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":193343312,"gmtCreate":1620771550036,"gmtModify":1634196541337,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193343312","repostId":"1138008630","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138008630","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620745704,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138008630?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-11 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"ARKK Gamma & What's Really Behind The QQQrash?<blockquote>ARKK伽马&QQQrash背后的真正原因是什么？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138008630","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showedenormous sell pressure all day in NQ futsacross all lots ","content":"<p>Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showed<b>enormous sell pressure all day in NQ futs</b>across all lots sizes (the largest in at least 1m), but<b>particularly in our medium- and large- lot buckets, proxies for large HFs and Asset Managers aggressively selling / shorting...</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券的“期货失衡”监测显示<b>NQ期货全天面临巨大抛售压力</b>跨所有批次大小（最大的至少1m），但是<b>特别是在我们的中批量和大批量桶中，大型HF和资产管理公司的代理人积极抛售/做空...</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b11c4266aecb4fc29b97f106da799c5\" tg-width=\"1248\" tg-height=\"600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Two things were behind the QQQcrash - ARKK's vicious circle and CTA Deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>QQQcrash背后有两件事——ARKK的恶性循环和CTA去杠杆化。</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's Charlie McElligott warns that the monstrous ~$20B ARKK active ETF is getting absolutely<b>torched in recent weeks amid a negative feedback loop from the mega-high growth / high multiple / “unprofitable” single-names.</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券(Nomura)的Charlie McElligott警告称，高达$20B的ARKK active ETF绝对会<b>最近几周，在超高增长/高倍数/“无利可图”的单一名称的负反馈循环中被烧毁。</b></blockquote></p><p> Critically, he explains,<b>the ETF itself now acting “shadow leverage” pressuring this selloff,</b>especially with their dubious risk management practice of heavily concentrated positioning into what are extraordinarily illiquid names.</p><p><blockquote>至关重要的是，他解释说，<b>ETF本身现在充当“影子杠杆”，给这次抛售带来压力，</b>尤其是他们可疑的风险管理实践，即严重集中投资于流动性极差的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Along with the inherently-extreme interest rate sensitivity within these hyper-growth / high-valuation names, this has made ARKK a popular downside play / hedge in the options space, with Dealers essentially max “short Gamma” near this current $98-100 level, while net Delta across options is ~ $-2B and essentially the low net Delta reading since start 2020.</p><p><blockquote>加上这些高速增长/高估值名称固有的极端利率敏感性，这使得ARKK成为期权领域受欢迎的下行投资/对冲工具，交易商基本上在当前98-100美元附近最大“空头伽马”水平，而期权的净Delta约为-2B美元，基本上是自2020年初以来的最低净Delta读数。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3eb7d728c70027833b43afaaa862ecc\" tg-width=\"716\" tg-height=\"383\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> But that is not the only driver of the chaos as<b>the Nomura QIS CTA Trend model showed massive deleveraging in Nasdaq yesterday into the down move</b>after the 3m window “sell trigger” was breached and flipped “short” (now joining the 2w and 1m windows as “short,” although neither of those has any signal loading), which overall turned the multi-year legacy “+100% Long” signal across all horizons down to just “+4.1% Long,” and implying ~$10.7B of notional selling in NQ futs in the deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>但这并不是混乱的唯一驱动因素<b>野村QIS CTA趋势模型显示，纳斯达克昨天大规模去杠杆化进入下行走势</b>在3m窗口“卖出触发器”被突破并翻转为“空头”（现在加入2w和1m窗口为“空头”，尽管这两个窗口都没有任何信号加载）之后，这总体上将多年传统的“+100%多头”信号下调至仅“+4.1%多头”，这意味着去杠杆化过程中NQ期货的名义抛售量约为107亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>And that was exaggerated from a “flows” perspective by the previously warned-about deep Dealer “short Gamma vs spot” in QQQs</b>we highlighted in recent notes as the center of Equities risk, which meant “accelerant” (delta hedging) flows into the selloff, with a now extremely negative $Gamma reading -$673mm (1.5%ile), while net Delta exploded lower to -$20B (1.6%ile).</p><p><blockquote><b>从“流量”的角度来看，这被之前警告的深度交易商“空头伽马vs现货”夸大了</b>我们在最近的报告中强调了股票风险的中心，这意味着“助推器”（Delta对冲）流入抛售，目前$Gamma读数为极端负值-6.73亿美元（1.5%ile），而净Delta则大幅下降至-$20B（1.6%ile）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/152632ec316a19852871d7bb0082d743\" tg-width=\"992\" tg-height=\"611\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> And Small Caps suffered the same as<b>IWM options too showing Dealers DEEP “short Gamma vs spot”</b>still (flips way up at 226.68) and overall $Gamma -206mm (18%ile), while $Delta is -$8.9B (9.3%ile) and negative until 227.34.</p><p><blockquote>小盘股遭受的损失与<b>IWM期权也向经销商显示深度“空头伽马与现货”</b>仍然（大幅上涨至226.68），总体$gamma-206mm（18%ile），而$Delta为-$89亿（9.3%ile），直到227.34为负。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/471db617d1ea1d81df7cfc6d0ec0280f\" tg-width=\"977\" tg-height=\"604\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The question - amid this morning's panic-bid in IWM and QQQ - is it over?</p><p><blockquote>问题是——在今天早上IWM和QQQ的恐慌性竞标中——结束了吗？</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6eaed5fb984ef5034fce79dc93442c5\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"808\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> We suspect no, as that ARKK Gamma vicious circle doesn't appear to be disappearing anytime soon.</p><p><blockquote>我们怀疑不会，因为ARKK伽马恶性循环似乎不会很快消失。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dramatic rebound this morning is explained by just how much more “skew” there is in the QQQ model.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>今天早上的戏剧性反弹可以用QQQ模型中有多少“偏差”来解释。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc561407c4bc89a8f4ffe08e23f292ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As SpotGamma explains,this supports that view of much larger volatility, both in dealers selling as Nasdaq moves lower and buying if Nasdaq rises.</p><p><blockquote>正如SpotGamma解释的那样，这支持了波动性更大的观点，交易商在纳斯达克走低时卖出，在纳斯达克上涨时买入。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ARKK Gamma & What's Really Behind The QQQrash?<blockquote>ARKK伽马&QQQrash背后的真正原因是什么？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nARKK Gamma & What's Really Behind The QQQrash?<blockquote>ARKK伽马&QQQrash背后的真正原因是什么？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-11 23:08</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showed<b>enormous sell pressure all day in NQ futs</b>across all lots sizes (the largest in at least 1m), but<b>particularly in our medium- and large- lot buckets, proxies for large HFs and Asset Managers aggressively selling / shorting...</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券的“期货失衡”监测显示<b>NQ期货全天面临巨大抛售压力</b>跨所有批次大小（最大的至少1m），但是<b>特别是在我们的中批量和大批量桶中，大型HF和资产管理公司的代理人积极抛售/做空...</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b11c4266aecb4fc29b97f106da799c5\" tg-width=\"1248\" tg-height=\"600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Two things were behind the QQQcrash - ARKK's vicious circle and CTA Deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>QQQcrash背后有两件事——ARKK的恶性循环和CTA去杠杆化。</blockquote></p><p> Nomura's Charlie McElligott warns that the monstrous ~$20B ARKK active ETF is getting absolutely<b>torched in recent weeks amid a negative feedback loop from the mega-high growth / high multiple / “unprofitable” single-names.</b></p><p><blockquote>野村证券(Nomura)的Charlie McElligott警告称，高达$20B的ARKK active ETF绝对会<b>最近几周，在超高增长/高倍数/“无利可图”的单一名称的负反馈循环中被烧毁。</b></blockquote></p><p> Critically, he explains,<b>the ETF itself now acting “shadow leverage” pressuring this selloff,</b>especially with their dubious risk management practice of heavily concentrated positioning into what are extraordinarily illiquid names.</p><p><blockquote>至关重要的是，他解释说，<b>ETF本身现在充当“影子杠杆”，给这次抛售带来压力，</b>尤其是他们可疑的风险管理实践，即严重集中投资于流动性极差的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Along with the inherently-extreme interest rate sensitivity within these hyper-growth / high-valuation names, this has made ARKK a popular downside play / hedge in the options space, with Dealers essentially max “short Gamma” near this current $98-100 level, while net Delta across options is ~ $-2B and essentially the low net Delta reading since start 2020.</p><p><blockquote>加上这些高速增长/高估值名称固有的极端利率敏感性，这使得ARKK成为期权领域受欢迎的下行投资/对冲工具，交易商基本上在当前98-100美元附近最大“空头伽马”水平，而期权的净Delta约为-2B美元，基本上是自2020年初以来的最低净Delta读数。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3eb7d728c70027833b43afaaa862ecc\" tg-width=\"716\" tg-height=\"383\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> But that is not the only driver of the chaos as<b>the Nomura QIS CTA Trend model showed massive deleveraging in Nasdaq yesterday into the down move</b>after the 3m window “sell trigger” was breached and flipped “short” (now joining the 2w and 1m windows as “short,” although neither of those has any signal loading), which overall turned the multi-year legacy “+100% Long” signal across all horizons down to just “+4.1% Long,” and implying ~$10.7B of notional selling in NQ futs in the deleveraging.</p><p><blockquote>但这并不是混乱的唯一驱动因素<b>野村QIS CTA趋势模型显示，纳斯达克昨天大规模去杠杆化进入下行走势</b>在3m窗口“卖出触发器”被突破并翻转为“空头”（现在加入2w和1m窗口为“空头”，尽管这两个窗口都没有任何信号加载）之后，这总体上将多年传统的“+100%多头”信号下调至仅“+4.1%多头”，这意味着去杠杆化过程中NQ期货的名义抛售量约为107亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>And that was exaggerated from a “flows” perspective by the previously warned-about deep Dealer “short Gamma vs spot” in QQQs</b>we highlighted in recent notes as the center of Equities risk, which meant “accelerant” (delta hedging) flows into the selloff, with a now extremely negative $Gamma reading -$673mm (1.5%ile), while net Delta exploded lower to -$20B (1.6%ile).</p><p><blockquote><b>从“流量”的角度来看，这被之前警告的深度交易商“空头伽马vs现货”夸大了</b>我们在最近的报告中强调了股票风险的中心，这意味着“助推器”（Delta对冲）流入抛售，目前$Gamma读数为极端负值-6.73亿美元（1.5%ile），而净Delta则大幅下降至-$20B（1.6%ile）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/152632ec316a19852871d7bb0082d743\" tg-width=\"992\" tg-height=\"611\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> And Small Caps suffered the same as<b>IWM options too showing Dealers DEEP “short Gamma vs spot”</b>still (flips way up at 226.68) and overall $Gamma -206mm (18%ile), while $Delta is -$8.9B (9.3%ile) and negative until 227.34.</p><p><blockquote>小盘股遭受的损失与<b>IWM期权也向经销商显示深度“空头伽马与现货”</b>仍然（大幅上涨至226.68），总体$gamma-206mm（18%ile），而$Delta为-$89亿（9.3%ile），直到227.34为负。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/471db617d1ea1d81df7cfc6d0ec0280f\" tg-width=\"977\" tg-height=\"604\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The question - amid this morning's panic-bid in IWM and QQQ - is it over?</p><p><blockquote>问题是——在今天早上IWM和QQQ的恐慌性竞标中——结束了吗？</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6eaed5fb984ef5034fce79dc93442c5\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"808\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> We suspect no, as that ARKK Gamma vicious circle doesn't appear to be disappearing anytime soon.</p><p><blockquote>我们怀疑不会，因为ARKK伽马恶性循环似乎不会很快消失。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The dramatic rebound this morning is explained by just how much more “skew” there is in the QQQ model.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>今天早上的戏剧性反弹可以用QQQ模型中有多少“偏差”来解释。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc561407c4bc89a8f4ffe08e23f292ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As SpotGamma explains,this supports that view of much larger volatility, both in dealers selling as Nasdaq moves lower and buying if Nasdaq rises.</p><p><blockquote>正如SpotGamma解释的那样，这支持了波动性更大的观点，交易商在纳斯达克走低时卖出，在纳斯达克上涨时买入。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/arkk-gamma-whats-really-behind-qqqrash\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/arkk-gamma-whats-really-behind-qqqrash","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138008630","content_text":"Nomura's “futures imbalance” monitor showedenormous sell pressure all day in NQ futsacross all lots sizes (the largest in at least 1m), butparticularly in our medium- and large- lot buckets, proxies for large HFs and Asset Managers aggressively selling / shorting...\nTwo things were behind the QQQcrash - ARKK's vicious circle and CTA Deleveraging.\nNomura's Charlie McElligott warns that the monstrous ~$20B ARKK active ETF is getting absolutelytorched in recent weeks amid a negative feedback loop from the mega-high growth / high multiple / “unprofitable” single-names.\nCritically, he explains,the ETF itself now acting “shadow leverage” pressuring this selloff,especially with their dubious risk management practice of heavily concentrated positioning into what are extraordinarily illiquid names.\nAlong with the inherently-extreme interest rate sensitivity within these hyper-growth / high-valuation names, this has made ARKK a popular downside play / hedge in the options space, with Dealers essentially max “short Gamma” near this current $98-100 level, while net Delta across options is ~ $-2B and essentially the low net Delta reading since start 2020.\n\nBut that is not the only driver of the chaos asthe Nomura QIS CTA Trend model showed massive deleveraging in Nasdaq yesterday into the down moveafter the 3m window “sell trigger” was breached and flipped “short” (now joining the 2w and 1m windows as “short,” although neither of those has any signal loading), which overall turned the multi-year legacy “+100% Long” signal across all horizons down to just “+4.1% Long,” and implying ~$10.7B of notional selling in NQ futs in the deleveraging.\nAnd that was exaggerated from a “flows” perspective by the previously warned-about deep Dealer “short Gamma vs spot” in QQQswe highlighted in recent notes as the center of Equities risk, which meant “accelerant” (delta hedging) flows into the selloff, with a now extremely negative $Gamma reading -$673mm (1.5%ile), while net Delta exploded lower to -$20B (1.6%ile).\n\nAnd Small Caps suffered the same asIWM options too showing Dealers DEEP “short Gamma vs spot”still (flips way up at 226.68) and overall $Gamma -206mm (18%ile), while $Delta is -$8.9B (9.3%ile) and negative until 227.34.\n\nThe question - amid this morning's panic-bid in IWM and QQQ - is it over?\n\nWe suspect no, as that ARKK Gamma vicious circle doesn't appear to be disappearing anytime soon.\nThe dramatic rebound this morning is explained by just how much more “skew” there is in the QQQ model.\n\nAs SpotGamma explains,this supports that view of much larger volatility, both in dealers selling as Nasdaq moves lower and buying if Nasdaq rises.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ARKK":0.9,"QQQ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2136,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193343597,"gmtCreate":1620771572619,"gmtModify":1634196540859,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/193343597","repostId":"1123134935","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2348,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":108357750,"gmtCreate":1620002001570,"gmtModify":1634208674582,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow ","listText":"Wow ","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/108357750","repostId":"1105099718","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105099718","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619897946,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1105099718?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-02 03:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105099718","media":"WSJ","summary":"Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate. Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’sBerkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK.B-0.95%. California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive. While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are","content":"<p>Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate</p><p><blockquote>机构股东正在敦促这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团在气候和治理方面进行变革</blockquote></p><p>Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’s<u>Berkshire Hathaway</u> Inc.BRK.B -0.95%</p><p><blockquote>专业基金经理正在加大对沃伦·巴菲特的压力<u>伯克希尔哈撒韦</u>公司BRK.B-0.95%</blockquote></p><p>California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dd969e4b237144cd02112f41464d169\" tg-width=\"824\" tg-height=\"1396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote>加州公共雇员退休系统和路博迈要求这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团引入新董事，并提供更多有关气候风险和高管的信息</blockquote></p><p>Leading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.</p><p><blockquote>在周六伯克希尔年会之前，代理顾问Glass Lewis&Co.和Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.建议投资者保留对董事会成员的投票。</blockquote></p><p>While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.</p><p><blockquote>尽管许多投诉并不新鲜，股东提案也不太可能获得通过，但在投资者对企业可持续发展问题的兴趣日益浓厚的情况下，伯克希尔近年来低迷的回报使其更容易受到批评。</blockquote></p><p>The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging as<u>a key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money</u>.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，股东就气候变化、社会进步和治理问题向公司施压的运动继续升温，并成为<u>基金经理努力留住客户资金的一个关键卖点</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,<u>the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020</u>, outperforming the S&P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.</p><p><blockquote>在巴菲特先生的领导下，<u>该公司拥有1965年至2020年20%的复合年化收益</u>，跑赢标普500期内含股息10.2%的涨幅。伯克希尔过去三年和五年的总回报率分别为12%和14%，而该指数的总回报率为19%和18%。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers公司治理主管Simiso Nzima表示：“伯克希尔获得通过的部分原因是其历史上强劲的财务业绩。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built up<u>a diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades</u>, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司继续强调其对长期发展的持续关注。巴菲特先生是该公司的首席执行官兼董事长，他建立了<u>主要由美国企业和投资组成的多元化投资组合，预计将持续数十年</u>，而不是与由蓬勃发展的科技股提振的波动市场竞争。</blockquote></p><p>Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>拥有4440亿美元资产的美国最大公共养老基金Calpers共同发起了一项股东提案，恳求伯克希尔提供更多有关气候相关风险和机遇的信息。</blockquote></p><p>The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.</p><p><blockquote>该养老基金还拒绝投票连任董事会审计和治理委员会成员，理由是未能满足股东对气候风险披露的要求。该公司表示，担心董事会缺乏新成员，不与股东接触，也不让投资者对高管薪酬计划进行投票。</blockquote></p><p>“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果不更新董事会，下一代董事就无法在长期任职的董事离开董事会之前向他们学习，”恩齐马先生说。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔拒绝在公司周六会议前发表评论。</blockquote></p><p>Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.</p><p><blockquote>拥有超过4290亿美元资产的私人基金管理公司Neuberger也表示，将投票支持几项与环境、社会和公司治理问题（通常缩写为ESG）相关的股东主导的提案。</blockquote></p><p>“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”</p><p><blockquote>跟踪该公司的路博迈分析师米歇尔·佐丹奴(Michelle Giordano)表示：“人们可能会认为，如果公司有责任保护环境或在社会问题和治理方面提供良好服务，那么伯克希尔可能会成为这些领域的领导者。”“但好像不是。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already produces<u>a sustainability report</u>.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔在其年度委托书中表示，虽然它同意公司有责任管理气候风险，但它更愿意让其各个运营部门致力于自己的环境政策。该公司写道，小型公司办公室的授权将侵犯帮助这些企业在伯克希尔旗下蓬勃发展的自主权。例如，伯克希尔哈撒韦能源公司已经生产<u>可持续发展报告</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers还承诺支持一项提案，要求该公司报告其员工多元化的努力。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔表示，多元化报告提案不恰当地暗示“伯克希尔60多家运营业务中的每一家都有一种标准化技术来解决多元化、公平性和包容性问题。”</blockquote></p><p>“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔写道：“为了比较不同地理位置的此类不同业务而要求统一的定量报告是不合理的。”</blockquote></p><p>Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis和ISS建议股东投票支持ESG提案，并对某些董事弃权。</blockquote></p><p>“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis ESG研究高级总监Courteney Keatinge表示：“今年主流投资者对ESG问题给予了更多关注。”</blockquote></p><p>Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.</p><p><blockquote>另一个因素在起作用：伯克希尔的股票正在慢慢易手。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.</p><p><blockquote>乔治华盛顿大学法学教授劳伦斯·坎宁安(Lawrence Cunningham)撰写了大量有关该公司的文章，他表示，随着时间的推移，巴菲特减持该公司股份的长期计划已将更多伯克希尔股票转移到大型机构投资者手中。</blockquote></p><p>About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示，伯克希尔约70%的股票由个人持有，其中许多人是忠于巴菲特的长期持有者。许多人并不关心伯克希尔是否缺乏企业可持续发展报告或随时准备回答他们问题的投资者关系团队。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”</p><p><blockquote>巴菲特在最近致股东的信中写道：“伯克希尔不同寻常且有价值的个人股东家族可能会加深您对我们不愿讨好华尔街分析师和机构投资者的理解。”“我们已经拥有了我们想要的投资者，总的来说，我认为他们不会通过替代者来升级。”</blockquote></p><p>The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters. When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>不过，机构持股比例的逐步上升可能已经让职业经理人有能力在治理问题上向伯克希尔施压。坎宁安说，当巴菲特和他的遗产出售剩余股份时，这些基金经理很可能会持有该公司更多的股份。</blockquote></p><p>“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示：“重大领导力和结构性变革将会出现，这些持有者正在为这场战斗做准备。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett Faces Impatient Investors as Berkshire Hathaway Returns Decline<blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司回报下滑，沃伦·巴菲特面临不耐烦的投资者</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">WSJ</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-02 03:39</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate</p><p><blockquote>机构股东正在敦促这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团在气候和治理方面进行变革</blockquote></p><p>Professional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’s<u>Berkshire Hathaway</u> Inc.BRK.B -0.95%</p><p><blockquote>专业基金经理正在加大对沃伦·巴菲特的压力<u>伯克希尔哈撒韦</u>公司BRK.B-0.95%</blockquote></p><p>California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executive<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dd969e4b237144cd02112f41464d169\" tg-width=\"824\" tg-height=\"1396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote>加州公共雇员退休系统和路博迈要求这家位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈的企业集团引入新董事，并提供更多有关气候风险和高管的信息</blockquote></p><p>Leading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.</p><p><blockquote>在周六伯克希尔年会之前，代理顾问Glass Lewis&Co.和Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.建议投资者保留对董事会成员的投票。</blockquote></p><p>While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.</p><p><blockquote>尽管许多投诉并不新鲜，股东提案也不太可能获得通过，但在投资者对企业可持续发展问题的兴趣日益浓厚的情况下，伯克希尔近年来低迷的回报使其更容易受到批评。</blockquote></p><p>The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging as<u>a key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money</u>.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，股东就气候变化、社会进步和治理问题向公司施压的运动继续升温，并成为<u>基金经理努力留住客户资金的一个关键卖点</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,<u>the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020</u>, outperforming the S&P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.</p><p><blockquote>在巴菲特先生的领导下，<u>该公司拥有1965年至2020年20%的复合年化收益</u>，跑赢标普500期内含股息10.2%的涨幅。伯克希尔过去三年和五年的总回报率分别为12%和14%，而该指数的总回报率为19%和18%。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers公司治理主管Simiso Nzima表示：“伯克希尔获得通过的部分原因是其历史上强劲的财务业绩。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built up<u>a diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades</u>, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔哈撒韦公司继续强调其对长期发展的持续关注。巴菲特先生是该公司的首席执行官兼董事长，他建立了<u>主要由美国企业和投资组成的多元化投资组合，预计将持续数十年</u>，而不是与由蓬勃发展的科技股提振的波动市场竞争。</blockquote></p><p>Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>拥有4440亿美元资产的美国最大公共养老基金Calpers共同发起了一项股东提案，恳求伯克希尔提供更多有关气候相关风险和机遇的信息。</blockquote></p><p>The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.</p><p><blockquote>该养老基金还拒绝投票连任董事会审计和治理委员会成员，理由是未能满足股东对气候风险披露的要求。该公司表示，担心董事会缺乏新成员，不与股东接触，也不让投资者对高管薪酬计划进行投票。</blockquote></p><p>“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果不更新董事会，下一代董事就无法在长期任职的董事离开董事会之前向他们学习，”恩齐马先生说。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔拒绝在公司周六会议前发表评论。</blockquote></p><p>Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.</p><p><blockquote>拥有超过4290亿美元资产的私人基金管理公司Neuberger也表示，将投票支持几项与环境、社会和公司治理问题（通常缩写为ESG）相关的股东主导的提案。</blockquote></p><p>“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”</p><p><blockquote>跟踪该公司的路博迈分析师米歇尔·佐丹奴(Michelle Giordano)表示：“人们可能会认为，如果公司有责任保护环境或在社会问题和治理方面提供良好服务，那么伯克希尔可能会成为这些领域的领导者。”“但好像不是。”</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already produces<u>a sustainability report</u>.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔在其年度委托书中表示，虽然它同意公司有责任管理气候风险，但它更愿意让其各个运营部门致力于自己的环境政策。该公司写道，小型公司办公室的授权将侵犯帮助这些企业在伯克希尔旗下蓬勃发展的自主权。例如，伯克希尔哈撒韦能源公司已经生产<u>可持续发展报告</u>.</blockquote></p><p>Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.</p><p><blockquote>Calpers还承诺支持一项提案，要求该公司报告其员工多元化的努力。</blockquote></p><p>Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔表示，多元化报告提案不恰当地暗示“伯克希尔60多家运营业务中的每一家都有一种标准化技术来解决多元化、公平性和包容性问题。”</blockquote></p><p>“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.</p><p><blockquote>伯克希尔写道：“为了比较不同地理位置的此类不同业务而要求统一的定量报告是不合理的。”</blockquote></p><p>Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis和ISS建议股东投票支持ESG提案，并对某些董事弃权。</blockquote></p><p>“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.</p><p><blockquote>Glass Lewis ESG研究高级总监Courteney Keatinge表示：“今年主流投资者对ESG问题给予了更多关注。”</blockquote></p><p>Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.</p><p><blockquote>另一个因素在起作用：伯克希尔的股票正在慢慢易手。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.</p><p><blockquote>乔治华盛顿大学法学教授劳伦斯·坎宁安(Lawrence Cunningham)撰写了大量有关该公司的文章，他表示，随着时间的推移，巴菲特减持该公司股份的长期计划已将更多伯克希尔股票转移到大型机构投资者手中。</blockquote></p><p>About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示，伯克希尔约70%的股票由个人持有，其中许多人是忠于巴菲特的长期持有者。许多人并不关心伯克希尔是否缺乏企业可持续发展报告或随时准备回答他们问题的投资者关系团队。</blockquote></p><p>“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”</p><p><blockquote>巴菲特在最近致股东的信中写道：“伯克希尔不同寻常且有价值的个人股东家族可能会加深您对我们不愿讨好华尔街分析师和机构投资者的理解。”“我们已经拥有了我们想要的投资者，总的来说，我认为他们不会通过替代者来升级。”</blockquote></p><p>The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters. When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>不过，机构持股比例的逐步上升可能已经让职业经理人有能力在治理问题上向伯克希尔施压。坎宁安说，当巴菲特和他的遗产出售剩余股份时，这些基金经理很可能会持有该公司更多的股份。</blockquote></p><p>“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.</p><p><blockquote>坎宁安表示：“重大领导力和结构性变革将会出现，这些持有者正在为这场战斗做准备。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/warren-buffett-faces-impatient-investors-as-berkshire-hathaway-returns-decline-11619794480\">WSJ</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/daaa666333c3b9bf0b940ffed4c1c369","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/warren-buffett-faces-impatient-investors-as-berkshire-hathaway-returns-decline-11619794480","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105099718","content_text":"Institutional shareholders are pressing for change on climate and governance at the Omaha, Neb., conglomerateProfessional money managers are turning up the heat on Warren Buffett’sBerkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK.B -0.95%California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Neuberger Berman have demanded that the Omaha, Neb., conglomerate bring in new directors and provide more disclosures on climate risks and executiveLeading up to Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday, proxy advisers Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. have recommended that investors withhold their votes for board members.While many of the complaints aren’t new and none of the shareholder proposals are likely to pass, Berkshire’s lackluster returns in recent years have made it more vulnerable to criticism amid a growing wave of investor interest in corporate sustainability issues.The shareholder movement to press companies on climate change, social progress and governance continues to gain steam in the U.S., emerging asa key selling point for money managers in their efforts to keep client money.Under Mr. Buffett’s leadership,the firm boasts 20% compounded annualized gains from 1965 to 2020, outperforming the S&P 500’s 10.2% gains including dividends during the period. Berkshire’s total returns over the past three- and five-year periods were 12% and 14%, respectively, compared with the index’s 19% and 18%.“Berkshire has gotten a pass in part because of its historically strong financial performance,” said Simiso Nzima, head of corporate governance at Calpers.Berkshire has continued to stress its continued focus on the long game. Mr. Buffett, who is chief executive and chairman of the company, built upa diverse portfolio of mostly U.S. businesses and investments meant to perform over decades, not to compete with a volatile market buoyed by booming tech stocks.Calpers, the nation’s largest public-pension fund with $444 billion in assets, co-sponsored a shareholder proposal imploring Berkshire to provide more disclosures on climate-related risks and opportunities.The pension fund is also withholding its votes to re-elect members of the board’s audit and governance committees on grounds of failing to meet shareholder demands over climate-risk disclosures. It said it was concerned that the board lacks new members, doesn’t engage with shareholders and isn’t letting investors vote on executive pay plans.“If you don’t refresh the board, you don’t have a next generation of directors able to learn from the long-serving directors before they leave the board,” Mr. Nzima said.Berkshire declined to comment ahead of the company’s Saturday meeting.Neuberger, a privately held money manager with more than $429 billion in assets, also said it would vote for several shareholder-led proposals related to environmental, social and corporate-governance issues, often abbreviated as ESG.“One would think that if companies have a responsibility to look out for the environment or deliver good on social issues and governance, that Berkshire might be a leader in these areas,” said Michelle Giordano, a Neuberger analyst who follows the company. “But it doesn’t seem like they are.”Berkshire said in its annual proxy statement that while it agreed companies had a responsibility to manage climate risks, it preferred to let its various operating units commit to their own environmental policies. Mandates from a small corporate office, the company wrote, would infringe upon the autonomy that has helped those businesses thrive under Berkshire’s ownership. Berkshire Hathaway Energy, for instance, already producesa sustainability report.Calpers has also pledged to support a proposal requiring the company to report its efforts to diversify its staff.Berkshire said the diversity-report proposal improperly suggests that “there is a standardized technique for each of Berkshire’s more than 60 operating businesses to address diversity, equity and inclusion.”“It would be unreasonable to ask for uniform, quantitative reporting for the purposes of comparing such dissimilar operations in different geographic locations,” Berkshire wrote.Glass Lewis and ISS recommended shareholders vote for the ESG proposals and withhold votes for certain directors.“This year there’s a lot more attention given from mainstream investors on ESG issues,” said Courteney Keatinge, a senior director of ESG research at Glass Lewis.Another factor is at play: Berkshire shares are slowly changing hands.Mr. Buffett’s longstanding plan to shrink his stake in the company over time has shifted more Berkshire shares to big institutional investors, said Lawrence Cunningham, a law professor at George Washington University who has written extensively about the company.About 70% of Berkshire’s shares are owned by individuals, many of whom are longtime holders loyal to Mr. Buffett, Mr. Cunningham said. And many don’t care whether Berkshire lacks a corporate sustainability report or an investor-relations team at the ready to answer their questions.“Berkshire’s unusual and valued family of individual shareholders may add to your understanding of our reluctance to court Wall Street analysts and institutional investors,” Mr. Buffett wrote in his most recent letter to shareholders. “We already have the investors we want and don’t think that they, on balance, would be upgraded by replacements.”The gradual uptick in institutional ownership, though, might already be empowering professional managers to press Berkshire on governance matters. When Mr. Buffett and his estate sell off his remaining shares, it is likely those money managers will hold an even bigger stake in the company, Mr. Cunningham said.“There will be a dawning of significant leadership and structural change, and these holders are preparing for that battle,” Mr. Cunningham said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BRK.B":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2128,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376130650,"gmtCreate":1619096317770,"gmtModify":1634288608846,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/376130650","repostId":"1123306589","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1332,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328832388,"gmtCreate":1615511045044,"gmtModify":1703490189102,"author":{"id":"3577235917796406","authorId":"3577235917796406","name":"CherylNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad1b16bd20201f59eb61ea7b053a21e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577235917796406","idStr":"3577235917796406"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tiger ","listText":"Tiger ","text":"Tiger","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6625a4282444cb175152ec4e35e49ed9","width":"750","height":"1708"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328832388","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2787,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
