Jensenchow的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Jensenchow

Jensenchow

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

2关注

0粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-06-15

Oh yes thats good

Apple: Meme Stocks Or Apple, I Choose Apple Every Time<blockquote>苹果：模因股票还是苹果，我每次都选择苹果</blockquote>

2021-06-15

Nice man

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-15

Nice piece of news!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-18

I agree

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-17

Oof

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-16

Yes

The U.S. Is Trying to Fix the Chip Shortage. What It Could Mean for Semiconductor Stocks<blockquote>美国正试图解决芯片短缺问题。这对半导体股票意味着什么</blockquote>

2021-03-16

Thats right

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-16

Nice

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577487093536782","uuid":"3577487093536782","gmtCreate":1614393149054,"gmtModify":1614413301552,"name":"Jensenchow","pinyin":"jensenchow","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":2,"tweetSize":8,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.01.02","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":187864865,"gmtCreate":1623749605657,"gmtModify":1634029120309,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Oh yes thats good","listText":"Oh yes thats good","text":"Oh yes thats good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187864865","repostId":"1167720481","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167720481","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623723356,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1167720481?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-15 10:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple: Meme Stocks Or Apple, I Choose Apple Every Time<blockquote>苹果：模因股票还是苹果，我每次都选择苹果</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167720481","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Apple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.Investors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.Apple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.Eventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.So what does AAPL do with all of the cash","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Apple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.</li>  <li>Investors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.</li>  <li>Apple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.</li>  <li>Eventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54c3b80a3353ef82f618688f13f74658\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Nikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>苹果在2021年一直是一项负面投资，而模因股票却爆炸式增长，这是荒谬的。</li><li>投资者有机会在苹果下一次上涨之前购买它，而注意力已转移到追逐模因股票的快速收益。</li><li>苹果预计 2021 财年收入将超过 3000 亿美元，净利润将达到 750 亿美元。</li><li>最终，苹果将被重新投入到党中，他们的数字将被庆祝。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Nikada/iStock 未通过 Getty Images 发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In 2021, Apple (AAPL) has become a negative returning investment underperforming the SPDR S&amp;P 500 Trust ETF (SPY) by a margin greater than 15%. In May of 2021, one of the hottest fund managers&nbsp;Cathie Wood&nbsp;of&nbsp;Ark Invest, sold nearly 300,000 shares of AAPL from the ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). It was reported that ARK, at one point, was reducing their stake in AAPL to add to their positions in&nbsp;Coinbase (COIN) and DraftKings (DKNG). Actively managed funds such as the one's ARK oversees buy and sell equities daily and could have been using AAPL as an alternative to cash. AAPL has a mixed bag of reviews as some believe its best days are ahead of it while others believe the glory days won't be reclaimed. I think the market is granting investors an opportunity as AAPL should breakout from its sideways pattern in the 2ndhalf of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>2021年，苹果（AAPL）已成为负回报投资，其表现逊于SPDR标普500信托ETF（SPDR标普500指数ETF）超过15%。2021 年 5 月，Ark Invest 最热门的基金经理之一 Cathie Wood 从 Ark Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) 中出售了近 300,000 股 AAPL 股票。据报道，ARK 一度减持 AAPL 股份，以增加其在 Coinbase (COIN) 和 DraftKings (DKNG) 的头寸。one’s ARK 等主动管理基金每天监督股票的买卖，并可能使用 AAPL 作为现金的替代品。AAPL 的评论褒贬不一，一些人认为其最好的日子还在后头，而另一些人则认为辉煌的日子将无法重现。我认为市场正在给投资者一个机会，因为苹果公司应该会在 2021 年下半年摆脱横盘整理模式。</blockquote></p><p> The market wasn't impressed by the blowout AAPL delivered in Q1 and Q2. Instead of an upside climb supported by fundamentals, shares of AAPL have been treading water. As an AAPL bull, it's perplexing that so much attention is placed on meme stocks instead of companies such as AAPL when it's setting the stage for their best year ever. After reading the comments of the recent articles on MEME stocks, I have written, then looking back at the comment sections of some AAPL articles, I just don't understand how the mindset is shifting to outright speculation &amp; gambling rather than investing. In the first 2 quarters of the fiscal year, 2021 AAPL has generated $3.08 in EPS while the entire 2020 fiscal year delivered $3.31 in EPS. AAPL is solidifying the foundation for its best year ever in many metrics, yet the market isn't impressed. I believe there will be impressive fireworks in the 2ndhalf of 2021, and patient shareholders will be rewarded as Q3 and Q4 numbers are reported.</p><p><blockquote>市场对 AAPL 在第一季度和第二季度的井喷并没有留下深刻印象。AAPL 股价并没有在基本面支撑下上涨，而是一直在下跌。作为一名 AAPL 多头，令人困惑的是，当 AAPL 等公司正在为其有史以来最好的一年奠定基础时，如此多的注意力却集中在模因股票上，而不是像 AAPL 这样的公司上。在阅读了最近关于模因股票的文章的评论后，我写道，然后回顾一些AAPL文章的评论部分，我只是不明白心态是如何转向彻底的投机和赌博而不是投资的。在本财年的前两个季度，AAPL 的每股收益为 3.08 美元，而整个 2020 财年的每股收益为 3.31 美元。AAPL 在许多指标上都在巩固其有史以来最好的一年的基础，但市场并没有留下深刻印象。我相信2021年下半年将会有令人印象深刻的烟火，随着第三季度和第四季度数据的公布，耐心的股东将会得到回报。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e86cb02096dfa9c6da05e350f274aa64\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"556\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple believes it's the best investment in the market and puts their money where their mouth is</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果相信这是市场上最好的投资，并说到做到</b></blockquote></p><p> So what does AAPL do with all of the cash it generates? For starters, they spend tens of billions annually building out their businesses while investing in research and development [R&amp;D]. In&nbsp;2020, AAPL spent $169.56 billion on their cost of generating revenue. The fruits of their labor can be seen in their product offerings and how quickly their newest business segments, including services and wearables, Home, and accessories, have grown. AAPL allocated $18.75 billion in 2020 to R&amp;D, generating advancements to their beloved products. One of the reasons AAPL has a cliental that could resemble a cult-like mentality is because AAPL doesn't stop innovating. They are always at the forefront pushing the boundaries of how technology can enhance an individual's daily life.</p><p><blockquote>那么，AAPL如何处理它产生的所有现金呢？首先，他们每年花费数百亿美元来发展业务，同时投资于研发[R&amp;D]。2020年，AAPL在创收成本上花费了1695.6亿美元。他们的劳动成果可以从他们的产品以及他们最新的业务部门（包括服务和可穿戴设备、家居和配件）的增长速度中看出。AAPL在2020年拨款187.5亿美元用于研发，为他们心爱的产品带来了进步。AAPL拥有类似于邪教心态的客户群的原因之一是因为AAPL没有停止创新。他们总是站在技术如何改善个人日常生活的最前沿。</blockquote></p><p> So what about the remaining cash after AAPL's business expenses are fulfilled? AAPL bets on themselves and views their stock as an investment. Since the fiscal year 2012, AAPL has repurchased $421.7 billion in its own stock. In 2021 AAPL has repurchased $43 billion in stock, indicating that senior leadership believes there is tremendous value in owning shares of AAPL. I remember the days where everyone got excited when insiders purchased shares of their company. For AAPL buying back stock is just an ordinary Monday. AAPL has repurchased more in stock over the past decade than most companies will ever see their market caps grow to. AAPL's&nbsp;board&nbsp;authorized an additional $90 billion to its existing share repurchase plan, and AAPL returned almost&nbsp;$23 billion&nbsp;in capital to shareholders in Q2 2021, it doesn't get more bullish than that.</p><p><blockquote>那么AAPL的业务费用兑现后剩余的现金怎么办呢？AAPL 押注于自己，并将其股票视为一项投资。自2012财年以来，AAPL已回购了4217亿美元的自有股票。2021年，AAPL回购了430亿美元的股票，表明高层领导认为拥有AAPL股票具有巨大的价值。我记得当内部人士购买他们公司股票时，每个人都很兴奋的日子。对于 AAPL 来说，回购股票只是一个普通的星期一。过去十年，苹果公司回购的股票数量超过了大多数公司的市值增长。AAPL 董事会授权向其现有股票回购计划追加 900 亿美元，AAPL 在 2021 年第二季度向股东返还了近 230 亿美元的资本，没有比这更乐观的了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3dbaf61374104ed17e51201af591ab7d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"349\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Meme stocks vs. Apple and the insanity of this market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>模因股票与苹果以及这个市场的疯狂</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> GameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) have decimated AAPL in share price appreciation throughout the first half of 2021. Regardless of why GME and AMC are up, the fact of the matter is GME has generated a return that exceeds 1,100%, and AMC has returned over 2,000%. Anyone who has ridden GME or AMC up, I congratulate and tip my hat to you. The market is being fueled by delusions of grandeur as AAPL is negative for the year, yet GME &amp; AMC have absolutely exploded to the upside.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站 (GME) 和AMC院线控股公司 (AMC) 在 2021 年上半年的股价升值幅度大幅削弱了 AAPL。不管GME和AMC为什么上涨，事实是GME的回报率超过了1,100%，AMC的回报率超过了2,000%。任何骑过 GME 或 AMC 的人，我都向你们表示祝贺并脱帽致敬。由于 AAPL 今年表现不佳，市场受到了宏伟错觉的推动，而 GME 和 AMC 却绝对上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c85258331453c02381346f8b6c676cec\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"499\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> What's changed for AMC in the past several months? I can tell you, not a single thing. AMC is still a company that is in the red and barely makes money. I get it investing in companies like AMC can generate huge returns due to volatility, and I am not knocking it. If you can make money on it, by all means, don't let anyone stand in your way but be careful. When you read through&nbsp;AMC's income statement, they have never exceeded $400 million in net income. In the past decade, AMC's most profitable year was 2013, as their net income was $364.4 million. In 2019 which had zero ramifications from COVID, AMC generated $5.47 billion in revenue and couldn't even turn a profit as they lost -$149.1 million. AMC's last quarterly report had -$2.3 billion in equity on its balance sheet. The reality is AMC can issue additional shares and sell them to raise capital. This would benefit AMC by improving its balance sheet and increase its cash on hand. It seems like people don't understand that when a company issues more shares, the initial batch becomes diluted and is worthless because of the additional supply. AMC can issue shares and strengthen its balance sheet, but it won't solve its profit problems. AAPL pays more in dividends to its shareholders every quarter than the profit AMC has generated in the past decade, yet AMC is the stock generating larger returns.</p><p><blockquote>过去几个月AMC发生了什么变化？我可以告诉你，一件事都没有。AMC仍然是一家亏损的公司，几乎不赚钱。我明白投资像 AMC 这样的公司可以由于波动性而产生巨大回报，我并没有否认这一点。如果你能在上面赚钱，无论如何，不要让任何人挡你的路，但要小心。当你通读AMC的损益表时，他们的净利润从未超过4亿美元。在过去十年中，AMC最赚钱的一年是2013年，净利润为3.644亿美元。2019 年，由于 COVID 的影响为零，AMC 创造了 54.7 亿美元的收入，但甚至无法盈利，因为他们亏损了 1.491 亿美元。AMC 上一季度报告显示其资产负债表上的股本为 -23 亿美元。现实情况是，AMC 可以发行额外股票并出售以筹集资金。这将使 AMC 受益，改善其资产负债表并增加手头现金。人们似乎不明白，当一家公司发行更多股票时，最初的一批股票会因为额外的供应量而被稀释，变得一文不值。AMC可以发行股票并加强其资产负债表，但这并不能解决其利润问题。AAPL 每个季度向股东支付的股息比 AMC 过去十年产生的利润还要多，但 AMC 是产生更大回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p> When investors purchase shares of AMC, they are buying a company with negative EPS. AMC's P/E ratio isn't measurable on a trailing twelve-month or a forward basis, yet investors are willing to pay for nonexistent earnings. In the comments of my&nbsp;AMC article, people said fundamentals don't matter. I understand that AMC has been a technical trade, but that doesn't change the reality that investors are paying for a company with negative earnings.Currently, the average PE Ratio for the S&amp;P is 45.02. If I use the EPS AAPL generated in the first 6 months of the fiscal year 2021 of $3.08, their PE Ratio would be 40.55. For the TTM, AAPL has generated $4.49 in EPS, which brings their PE Ratio down to 28.09. Currently, investors are paying $28.09 for every $1 in earnings AAPL generates, which is low for the tech industry.Amazon (AMZN)&nbsp;has a PE of 62.44,Microsoft (MSFT)34.93, and&nbsp;Google (GOOGL)of 32.05. Call me old-fashioned, but I like to invest in companies that turn a profit.</p><p><blockquote>当投资者购买 AMC 股票时，他们购买的是一家每股收益为负的公司。AMC 的市盈率无法在过去 12 个月或远期基础上衡量，但投资者愿意为不存在的收益买单。在我的AMC文章的评论中，人们说基本面并不重要。我知道 AMC 一直是一项技术性交易，但这并不能改变投资者为负收益公司买单的现实。目前，标准普尔的平均市盈率为45.02。如果我使用 AAPL 在 2021 财年前 6 个月产生的每股收益 3.08 美元，他们的市盈率将为 40.55。对于 TTM，AAPL 的每股收益为 4.49 美元，这使得他们的市盈率降至 28.09。目前，投资者为 AAPL 每产生 1 美元的收益支付 28.09 美元，这对于科技行业来说是较低的。亚马逊 (AMZN) 的市盈率为 62.44，微软 (MSFT) 为 34.93，谷歌 (GOOGL) 为 32.05。看涨期权我很守旧，但我喜欢投资盈利的公司。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79e06d9bc68454731c984429111ff056\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"661\"><span>(Source:multpl.com)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：multpl.com）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Laying out the bull case for Apple and why a breakout to the upside is inevitable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>阐述苹果的牛市理由以及为什么突破上行是不可避免的</b></blockquote></p><p> AAPL has a cult-like following that gravitates to its products and services. For the first 6 months of 2021,AAPLhas generated $201.02 billion in revenue, $82.41 billion in gross profit, and $52.39 billion in net income. In 2021 AAPL has already generated 73.23% ($201.02 billion) of 2020's total revenue, then 78.51% of 2020's gross income ($82.41 billion) and 91.25% of 2020's total net income ($52.39 billion). AAPL is on track to decimate its previous records, and unless something unfathomable occurs, 2021 will be AAPL's best year ever.</p><p><blockquote>AAPL 拥有一批狂热的追随者，他们被其产品和服务所吸引。2021年前6个月，AAPLhas实现收入2010.2亿美元，毛利润824.1亿美元，净利润523.9亿美元。2021年，AAPL已经创造了2020年总收入的73.23%（2010.2亿美元），然后是2020年总收入的78.51%（824.1亿美元）和2020年总净收入的91.25%（523.9亿美元）。AAPL 有望打破其之前的记录，除非发生深不可测的事情，否则 2021 年将是 AAPL 有史以来最好的一年。</blockquote></p><p> So the real questions are what's causing the surge in AAPL's financials, and are they sustainable? Part of the reason is AAPL has seen an increase in its hardware sales from iPhone 12's down to iPads. An argument can be made that many people needed to upgrade their technology during the pandemic due to working from home or remote learning, but that logic can't be used for 2021. At the end of April, when&nbsp;AAPL reported Q2,their iPhone sales exceeded expectations by $7.14 billion, Mac sales by $2.2 billion, and iPad sales by $2.01 billion. These numbers were a year later, and while the iPhone 12, which was AAPL's first 5G release, was expected to create tailwinds, I believe the pandemic pushed society into a place where a greater emphasis is placed on technology.</p><p><blockquote>因此，真正的问题是，是什么导致了 AAPL 财务状况的飙升，以及它们是否可持续？部分原因是苹果公司的硬件销量从 iPhone 12 到 iPad 都有所增长。可以说，由于在家工作或远程学习，许多人在疫情期间需要升级他们的技术，但这种逻辑不能用于2021年。4月底，苹果公司公布第二季度业绩时，其iPhone销售额超出预期71.4亿美元，Mac销售额超出预期22亿美元，iPad销售额超出预期20.1亿美元。这些数字是在一年后公布的，虽然苹果公司发布的第一款 5G 手机 iPhone 12 预计会带来顺风，但我相信疫情将社会推向了一个更加重视技术的地方。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I believe AAPL will continue to see strong hardware sales, but that's only one piece of the puzzle. Services and Wearables Home and Accessories are becoming huge components of AAPL's financial metrics. In&nbsp;2018 Services&nbsp;generated $39.75 billion in revenue. In 2019 Services increased by $6.54 billion (16.46%) as they finished the year with $46.29 billion in revenue. In 2020 Services grew by $7.48 billion (16.15%) as its revenue totaled $53.77 billion. In the first 6 months of 2020, Services has already generated $32.66 billion in revenue, which is 60.75% of 2020's total revenue. Services continue to grow creating a true business segment of reoccurring revenue for AAPL. The beauty of Services is with each piece of hardware AAPL sells; there is an opportunity to generate additional revenue through Services every month.</p><p><blockquote>我相信 AAPL 将继续看到强劲的硬件销售，但这只是难题的一部分。服务、可穿戴设备、家居和配件正在成为 AAPL 财务指标的重要组成部分。2018年，服务业创造了397.5亿美元的收入。2019年，服务业增长了65.4亿美元（16.46%），年收入为462.9亿美元。2020年，服务业增长了74.8亿美元（16.15%），收入总计537.7亿美元。2020年前6个月，服务业已经创造了326.6亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的60.75%。服务持续增长，为 AAPL 创造了一个真正的经常性收入业务部门。服务之美在于AAPL销售的每一件硬件；每个月都有机会通过服务产生额外收入。</blockquote></p><p> Services are becoming a home run for AAPL as it diversifies its revenue mix away from being solely constructed from physical products. At the close of the fiscal year 2020, Services had increased its annual revenue by $29.42 billion (120.83%) in just 4 years. In the first 6 months of 2021, Services has generated $32.66 billion, which is 60% of 2020's annual revenue. AAPL is on track to crack $60 billion in revenue from Services in the fiscal year 2021. Looking further out, Services could be a $100 billion revenue generator in the not-too-distant future.</p><p><blockquote>随着 AAPL 实现收入结构多元化，不再仅仅依赖实体产品，服务正在成为 AAPL 的本垒打。截至 2020 财年末，Services 在短短 4 年内年收入增加了 294.2 亿美元（120.83%）。2021年前6个月，服务业创造了326.6亿美元，占2020年年收入的60%。AAPL 有望在 2021 财年实现 600 亿美元的服务收入。展望未来，在不久的将来，服务业可能会产生 1000 亿美元的收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f044f79f7525038fb94ed27b6a92209\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Wearables Home and Accessories continues to follow in Service's footsteps as it has become a larger revenue segment than iPad and Mac. With the inception of the Apple Watch, this category has grown from generating $11.13 billion in 2016 to $30.62 billion in 2020. Over 4 fiscal years, Wearables Home and Accessories has increased its revenue by $24.48 billion (175.06%), and its growth keeps expanding. In the first 6 months of 2021, Wearables Home and Accessories have generated $20.81 billion in revenue, which is 67.95% of 2020's total revenue. AAPL is certainly on track to generate $35 billion-plus in revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories in the fiscal year 2021. Over the next several years, AAPL is on track to generate $50 billion in annual revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories.</p><p><blockquote>家庭可穿戴设备和配件继续追随 Service 的脚步，因为它已成为比 iPad 和 Mac 更大的收入领域。随着苹果观察的推出，这一类别已经从2016年的111.3亿美元增长到2020年的306.2亿美元。在4个财年中，可穿戴家居和配件的收入增加了244.8亿美元（175.06%），并且增长不断扩大。2021年前6个月，家用可穿戴设备和配件创造了208.1亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的67.95%。AAPL 肯定有望在 2021 财年从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生超过 350 亿美元的收入。未来几年，AAPL 有望从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生 500 亿美元的年收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7071ec652302c6cab585fef4c408d65\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> By the end of the Fiscal Year 2025, there is a good chance that Services can generate more than $78 billion, and Wearables Home and Accessories could generate over $44 billion in annual revenue if they both grow at a 10% rate. These two categories are on pace to exceed $100 billion in revenue combined, which could grow into $150 billion annually in the late 2020s. I am shocked investors haven't been piling into AAPL, and it's even more ludicrous that an emphasis on AAPL's numbers isn't being discussed in greater detail. What's AAPL worth down the road when Services reaches $100 billion in revenue and Wearables Home and Accessories reaches $50 billion? Over the past decade, AAPL has continued to innovate and change how technology is used, and to think their best days are behind them is a notion I refuse to believe.</p><p><blockquote>到 2025 财年末，服务很有可能产生超过 780 亿美元的收入，如果家用可穿戴设备和配件都以 10% 的速度增长，则年收入可能超过 440 亿美元。这两个类别的总收入有望超过 1000 亿美元，到 2020 年代末，每年可能会增长到 1500 亿美元。我感到震惊的是，投资者没有大量涌入 AAPL，更可笑的是，对 AAPL 数据的强调没有得到更详细的讨论。当服务收入达到 1000 亿美元，家用可穿戴设备和配件收入达到 500 亿美元时，AAPL 的未来价值是多少？在过去的十年里，AAPL不断创新和改变技术的使用方式，我拒绝相信他们最好的日子已经过去。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62cd231b75d9f875329f6713debe846b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"191\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p> The meme stocks are causing a lot of excitement for some investors while they leave a whole other group shaking their heads. Other than a gamble, I can't understand why people want to invest in AMC when you could buy shares of AAPL on sale. AAPL should have exploded to the upside, but its 2 recent blowout quarters didn't move the needle. I believe it's going to be different once the Q3 numbers are reported. We're going to find out that once again, AAPL continues to buy shares by the billions while reporting that in 9 months, they have generated more net income than all of 2020. In the first 6 months of operations, AAPL has generated $201.02 billion in revenue and $52.39 billion in net income while giving back $53.2 billion in buybacks and dividends. Investors have been granted an opportunity to buy more AAPL before the next leg up. I am a shareholder of AAPL, and I plan on buying more before Q3 earnings.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票给一些投资者带来了极大的兴奋，而他们却让另一大群人摇头。除了赌博之外，我无法理解当你可以购买出售的 AAPL 股票时，为什么人们还要投资 AMC。苹果公司本应暴涨，但其最近两个季度的井喷并没有改变局面。我相信一旦第三季度数据公布，情况就会有所不同。我们将再次发现，AAPL 继续购买数十亿美元的股票，同时报告称，在 9 个月内，他们产生的净利润超过了 2020 年全年。在运营的前6个月，AAPL创造了2010.2亿美元的收入和523.9亿美元的净利润，同时返还了532亿美元的回购和股息。投资者有机会在下一次上涨之前购买更多 AAPL。我是 AAPL 的股东，我计划在第三季度财报公布之前购买更多股票。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple: Meme Stocks Or Apple, I Choose Apple Every Time<blockquote>苹果：模因股票还是苹果，我每次都选择苹果</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple: Meme Stocks Or Apple, I Choose Apple Every Time<blockquote>苹果：模因股票还是苹果，我每次都选择苹果</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 10:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Apple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.</li>  <li>Investors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.</li>  <li>Apple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.</li>  <li>Eventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54c3b80a3353ef82f618688f13f74658\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Nikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>苹果在2021年一直是一项负面投资，而模因股票却爆炸式增长，这是荒谬的。</li><li>投资者有机会在苹果下一次上涨之前购买它，而注意力已转移到追逐模因股票的快速收益。</li><li>苹果预计 2021 财年收入将超过 3000 亿美元，净利润将达到 750 亿美元。</li><li>最终，苹果将被重新投入到党中，他们的数字将被庆祝。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Nikada/iStock 未通过 Getty Images 发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In 2021, Apple (AAPL) has become a negative returning investment underperforming the SPDR S&amp;P 500 Trust ETF (SPY) by a margin greater than 15%. In May of 2021, one of the hottest fund managers&nbsp;Cathie Wood&nbsp;of&nbsp;Ark Invest, sold nearly 300,000 shares of AAPL from the ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). It was reported that ARK, at one point, was reducing their stake in AAPL to add to their positions in&nbsp;Coinbase (COIN) and DraftKings (DKNG). Actively managed funds such as the one's ARK oversees buy and sell equities daily and could have been using AAPL as an alternative to cash. AAPL has a mixed bag of reviews as some believe its best days are ahead of it while others believe the glory days won't be reclaimed. I think the market is granting investors an opportunity as AAPL should breakout from its sideways pattern in the 2ndhalf of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>2021年，苹果（AAPL）已成为负回报投资，其表现逊于SPDR标普500信托ETF（SPDR标普500指数ETF）超过15%。2021 年 5 月，Ark Invest 最热门的基金经理之一 Cathie Wood 从 Ark Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) 中出售了近 300,000 股 AAPL 股票。据报道，ARK 一度减持 AAPL 股份，以增加其在 Coinbase (COIN) 和 DraftKings (DKNG) 的头寸。one’s ARK 等主动管理基金每天监督股票的买卖，并可能使用 AAPL 作为现金的替代品。AAPL 的评论褒贬不一，一些人认为其最好的日子还在后头，而另一些人则认为辉煌的日子将无法重现。我认为市场正在给投资者一个机会，因为苹果公司应该会在 2021 年下半年摆脱横盘整理模式。</blockquote></p><p> The market wasn't impressed by the blowout AAPL delivered in Q1 and Q2. Instead of an upside climb supported by fundamentals, shares of AAPL have been treading water. As an AAPL bull, it's perplexing that so much attention is placed on meme stocks instead of companies such as AAPL when it's setting the stage for their best year ever. After reading the comments of the recent articles on MEME stocks, I have written, then looking back at the comment sections of some AAPL articles, I just don't understand how the mindset is shifting to outright speculation &amp; gambling rather than investing. In the first 2 quarters of the fiscal year, 2021 AAPL has generated $3.08 in EPS while the entire 2020 fiscal year delivered $3.31 in EPS. AAPL is solidifying the foundation for its best year ever in many metrics, yet the market isn't impressed. I believe there will be impressive fireworks in the 2ndhalf of 2021, and patient shareholders will be rewarded as Q3 and Q4 numbers are reported.</p><p><blockquote>市场对 AAPL 在第一季度和第二季度的井喷并没有留下深刻印象。AAPL 股价并没有在基本面支撑下上涨，而是一直在下跌。作为一名 AAPL 多头，令人困惑的是，当 AAPL 等公司正在为其有史以来最好的一年奠定基础时，如此多的注意力却集中在模因股票上，而不是像 AAPL 这样的公司上。在阅读了最近关于模因股票的文章的评论后，我写道，然后回顾一些AAPL文章的评论部分，我只是不明白心态是如何转向彻底的投机和赌博而不是投资的。在本财年的前两个季度，AAPL 的每股收益为 3.08 美元，而整个 2020 财年的每股收益为 3.31 美元。AAPL 在许多指标上都在巩固其有史以来最好的一年的基础，但市场并没有留下深刻印象。我相信2021年下半年将会有令人印象深刻的烟火，随着第三季度和第四季度数据的公布，耐心的股东将会得到回报。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e86cb02096dfa9c6da05e350f274aa64\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"556\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple believes it's the best investment in the market and puts their money where their mouth is</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果相信这是市场上最好的投资，并说到做到</b></blockquote></p><p> So what does AAPL do with all of the cash it generates? For starters, they spend tens of billions annually building out their businesses while investing in research and development [R&amp;D]. In&nbsp;2020, AAPL spent $169.56 billion on their cost of generating revenue. The fruits of their labor can be seen in their product offerings and how quickly their newest business segments, including services and wearables, Home, and accessories, have grown. AAPL allocated $18.75 billion in 2020 to R&amp;D, generating advancements to their beloved products. One of the reasons AAPL has a cliental that could resemble a cult-like mentality is because AAPL doesn't stop innovating. They are always at the forefront pushing the boundaries of how technology can enhance an individual's daily life.</p><p><blockquote>那么，AAPL如何处理它产生的所有现金呢？首先，他们每年花费数百亿美元来发展业务，同时投资于研发[R&amp;D]。2020年，AAPL在创收成本上花费了1695.6亿美元。他们的劳动成果可以从他们的产品以及他们最新的业务部门（包括服务和可穿戴设备、家居和配件）的增长速度中看出。AAPL在2020年拨款187.5亿美元用于研发，为他们心爱的产品带来了进步。AAPL拥有类似于邪教心态的客户群的原因之一是因为AAPL没有停止创新。他们总是站在技术如何改善个人日常生活的最前沿。</blockquote></p><p> So what about the remaining cash after AAPL's business expenses are fulfilled? AAPL bets on themselves and views their stock as an investment. Since the fiscal year 2012, AAPL has repurchased $421.7 billion in its own stock. In 2021 AAPL has repurchased $43 billion in stock, indicating that senior leadership believes there is tremendous value in owning shares of AAPL. I remember the days where everyone got excited when insiders purchased shares of their company. For AAPL buying back stock is just an ordinary Monday. AAPL has repurchased more in stock over the past decade than most companies will ever see their market caps grow to. AAPL's&nbsp;board&nbsp;authorized an additional $90 billion to its existing share repurchase plan, and AAPL returned almost&nbsp;$23 billion&nbsp;in capital to shareholders in Q2 2021, it doesn't get more bullish than that.</p><p><blockquote>那么AAPL的业务费用兑现后剩余的现金怎么办呢？AAPL 押注于自己，并将其股票视为一项投资。自2012财年以来，AAPL已回购了4217亿美元的自有股票。2021年，AAPL回购了430亿美元的股票，表明高层领导认为拥有AAPL股票具有巨大的价值。我记得当内部人士购买他们公司股票时，每个人都很兴奋的日子。对于 AAPL 来说，回购股票只是一个普通的星期一。过去十年，苹果公司回购的股票数量超过了大多数公司的市值增长。AAPL 董事会授权向其现有股票回购计划追加 900 亿美元，AAPL 在 2021 年第二季度向股东返还了近 230 亿美元的资本，没有比这更乐观的了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3dbaf61374104ed17e51201af591ab7d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"349\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Meme stocks vs. Apple and the insanity of this market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>模因股票与苹果以及这个市场的疯狂</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> GameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) have decimated AAPL in share price appreciation throughout the first half of 2021. Regardless of why GME and AMC are up, the fact of the matter is GME has generated a return that exceeds 1,100%, and AMC has returned over 2,000%. Anyone who has ridden GME or AMC up, I congratulate and tip my hat to you. The market is being fueled by delusions of grandeur as AAPL is negative for the year, yet GME &amp; AMC have absolutely exploded to the upside.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站 (GME) 和AMC院线控股公司 (AMC) 在 2021 年上半年的股价升值幅度大幅削弱了 AAPL。不管GME和AMC为什么上涨，事实是GME的回报率超过了1,100%，AMC的回报率超过了2,000%。任何骑过 GME 或 AMC 的人，我都向你们表示祝贺并脱帽致敬。由于 AAPL 今年表现不佳，市场受到了宏伟错觉的推动，而 GME 和 AMC 却绝对上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c85258331453c02381346f8b6c676cec\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"499\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> What's changed for AMC in the past several months? I can tell you, not a single thing. AMC is still a company that is in the red and barely makes money. I get it investing in companies like AMC can generate huge returns due to volatility, and I am not knocking it. If you can make money on it, by all means, don't let anyone stand in your way but be careful. When you read through&nbsp;AMC's income statement, they have never exceeded $400 million in net income. In the past decade, AMC's most profitable year was 2013, as their net income was $364.4 million. In 2019 which had zero ramifications from COVID, AMC generated $5.47 billion in revenue and couldn't even turn a profit as they lost -$149.1 million. AMC's last quarterly report had -$2.3 billion in equity on its balance sheet. The reality is AMC can issue additional shares and sell them to raise capital. This would benefit AMC by improving its balance sheet and increase its cash on hand. It seems like people don't understand that when a company issues more shares, the initial batch becomes diluted and is worthless because of the additional supply. AMC can issue shares and strengthen its balance sheet, but it won't solve its profit problems. AAPL pays more in dividends to its shareholders every quarter than the profit AMC has generated in the past decade, yet AMC is the stock generating larger returns.</p><p><blockquote>过去几个月AMC发生了什么变化？我可以告诉你，一件事都没有。AMC仍然是一家亏损的公司，几乎不赚钱。我明白投资像 AMC 这样的公司可以由于波动性而产生巨大回报，我并没有否认这一点。如果你能在上面赚钱，无论如何，不要让任何人挡你的路，但要小心。当你通读AMC的损益表时，他们的净利润从未超过4亿美元。在过去十年中，AMC最赚钱的一年是2013年，净利润为3.644亿美元。2019 年，由于 COVID 的影响为零，AMC 创造了 54.7 亿美元的收入，但甚至无法盈利，因为他们亏损了 1.491 亿美元。AMC 上一季度报告显示其资产负债表上的股本为 -23 亿美元。现实情况是，AMC 可以发行额外股票并出售以筹集资金。这将使 AMC 受益，改善其资产负债表并增加手头现金。人们似乎不明白，当一家公司发行更多股票时，最初的一批股票会因为额外的供应量而被稀释，变得一文不值。AMC可以发行股票并加强其资产负债表，但这并不能解决其利润问题。AAPL 每个季度向股东支付的股息比 AMC 过去十年产生的利润还要多，但 AMC 是产生更大回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p> When investors purchase shares of AMC, they are buying a company with negative EPS. AMC's P/E ratio isn't measurable on a trailing twelve-month or a forward basis, yet investors are willing to pay for nonexistent earnings. In the comments of my&nbsp;AMC article, people said fundamentals don't matter. I understand that AMC has been a technical trade, but that doesn't change the reality that investors are paying for a company with negative earnings.Currently, the average PE Ratio for the S&amp;P is 45.02. If I use the EPS AAPL generated in the first 6 months of the fiscal year 2021 of $3.08, their PE Ratio would be 40.55. For the TTM, AAPL has generated $4.49 in EPS, which brings their PE Ratio down to 28.09. Currently, investors are paying $28.09 for every $1 in earnings AAPL generates, which is low for the tech industry.Amazon (AMZN)&nbsp;has a PE of 62.44,Microsoft (MSFT)34.93, and&nbsp;Google (GOOGL)of 32.05. Call me old-fashioned, but I like to invest in companies that turn a profit.</p><p><blockquote>当投资者购买 AMC 股票时，他们购买的是一家每股收益为负的公司。AMC 的市盈率无法在过去 12 个月或远期基础上衡量，但投资者愿意为不存在的收益买单。在我的AMC文章的评论中，人们说基本面并不重要。我知道 AMC 一直是一项技术性交易，但这并不能改变投资者为负收益公司买单的现实。目前，标准普尔的平均市盈率为45.02。如果我使用 AAPL 在 2021 财年前 6 个月产生的每股收益 3.08 美元，他们的市盈率将为 40.55。对于 TTM，AAPL 的每股收益为 4.49 美元，这使得他们的市盈率降至 28.09。目前，投资者为 AAPL 每产生 1 美元的收益支付 28.09 美元，这对于科技行业来说是较低的。亚马逊 (AMZN) 的市盈率为 62.44，微软 (MSFT) 为 34.93，谷歌 (GOOGL) 为 32.05。看涨期权我很守旧，但我喜欢投资盈利的公司。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79e06d9bc68454731c984429111ff056\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"661\"><span>(Source:multpl.com)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：multpl.com）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Laying out the bull case for Apple and why a breakout to the upside is inevitable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>阐述苹果的牛市理由以及为什么突破上行是不可避免的</b></blockquote></p><p> AAPL has a cult-like following that gravitates to its products and services. For the first 6 months of 2021,AAPLhas generated $201.02 billion in revenue, $82.41 billion in gross profit, and $52.39 billion in net income. In 2021 AAPL has already generated 73.23% ($201.02 billion) of 2020's total revenue, then 78.51% of 2020's gross income ($82.41 billion) and 91.25% of 2020's total net income ($52.39 billion). AAPL is on track to decimate its previous records, and unless something unfathomable occurs, 2021 will be AAPL's best year ever.</p><p><blockquote>AAPL 拥有一批狂热的追随者，他们被其产品和服务所吸引。2021年前6个月，AAPLhas实现收入2010.2亿美元，毛利润824.1亿美元，净利润523.9亿美元。2021年，AAPL已经创造了2020年总收入的73.23%（2010.2亿美元），然后是2020年总收入的78.51%（824.1亿美元）和2020年总净收入的91.25%（523.9亿美元）。AAPL 有望打破其之前的记录，除非发生深不可测的事情，否则 2021 年将是 AAPL 有史以来最好的一年。</blockquote></p><p> So the real questions are what's causing the surge in AAPL's financials, and are they sustainable? Part of the reason is AAPL has seen an increase in its hardware sales from iPhone 12's down to iPads. An argument can be made that many people needed to upgrade their technology during the pandemic due to working from home or remote learning, but that logic can't be used for 2021. At the end of April, when&nbsp;AAPL reported Q2,their iPhone sales exceeded expectations by $7.14 billion, Mac sales by $2.2 billion, and iPad sales by $2.01 billion. These numbers were a year later, and while the iPhone 12, which was AAPL's first 5G release, was expected to create tailwinds, I believe the pandemic pushed society into a place where a greater emphasis is placed on technology.</p><p><blockquote>因此，真正的问题是，是什么导致了 AAPL 财务状况的飙升，以及它们是否可持续？部分原因是苹果公司的硬件销量从 iPhone 12 到 iPad 都有所增长。可以说，由于在家工作或远程学习，许多人在疫情期间需要升级他们的技术，但这种逻辑不能用于2021年。4月底，苹果公司公布第二季度业绩时，其iPhone销售额超出预期71.4亿美元，Mac销售额超出预期22亿美元，iPad销售额超出预期20.1亿美元。这些数字是在一年后公布的，虽然苹果公司发布的第一款 5G 手机 iPhone 12 预计会带来顺风，但我相信疫情将社会推向了一个更加重视技术的地方。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I believe AAPL will continue to see strong hardware sales, but that's only one piece of the puzzle. Services and Wearables Home and Accessories are becoming huge components of AAPL's financial metrics. In&nbsp;2018 Services&nbsp;generated $39.75 billion in revenue. In 2019 Services increased by $6.54 billion (16.46%) as they finished the year with $46.29 billion in revenue. In 2020 Services grew by $7.48 billion (16.15%) as its revenue totaled $53.77 billion. In the first 6 months of 2020, Services has already generated $32.66 billion in revenue, which is 60.75% of 2020's total revenue. Services continue to grow creating a true business segment of reoccurring revenue for AAPL. The beauty of Services is with each piece of hardware AAPL sells; there is an opportunity to generate additional revenue through Services every month.</p><p><blockquote>我相信 AAPL 将继续看到强劲的硬件销售，但这只是难题的一部分。服务、可穿戴设备、家居和配件正在成为 AAPL 财务指标的重要组成部分。2018年，服务业创造了397.5亿美元的收入。2019年，服务业增长了65.4亿美元（16.46%），年收入为462.9亿美元。2020年，服务业增长了74.8亿美元（16.15%），收入总计537.7亿美元。2020年前6个月，服务业已经创造了326.6亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的60.75%。服务持续增长，为 AAPL 创造了一个真正的经常性收入业务部门。服务之美在于AAPL销售的每一件硬件；每个月都有机会通过服务产生额外收入。</blockquote></p><p> Services are becoming a home run for AAPL as it diversifies its revenue mix away from being solely constructed from physical products. At the close of the fiscal year 2020, Services had increased its annual revenue by $29.42 billion (120.83%) in just 4 years. In the first 6 months of 2021, Services has generated $32.66 billion, which is 60% of 2020's annual revenue. AAPL is on track to crack $60 billion in revenue from Services in the fiscal year 2021. Looking further out, Services could be a $100 billion revenue generator in the not-too-distant future.</p><p><blockquote>随着 AAPL 实现收入结构多元化，不再仅仅依赖实体产品，服务正在成为 AAPL 的本垒打。截至 2020 财年末，Services 在短短 4 年内年收入增加了 294.2 亿美元（120.83%）。2021年前6个月，服务业创造了326.6亿美元，占2020年年收入的60%。AAPL 有望在 2021 财年实现 600 亿美元的服务收入。展望未来，在不久的将来，服务业可能会产生 1000 亿美元的收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f044f79f7525038fb94ed27b6a92209\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Wearables Home and Accessories continues to follow in Service's footsteps as it has become a larger revenue segment than iPad and Mac. With the inception of the Apple Watch, this category has grown from generating $11.13 billion in 2016 to $30.62 billion in 2020. Over 4 fiscal years, Wearables Home and Accessories has increased its revenue by $24.48 billion (175.06%), and its growth keeps expanding. In the first 6 months of 2021, Wearables Home and Accessories have generated $20.81 billion in revenue, which is 67.95% of 2020's total revenue. AAPL is certainly on track to generate $35 billion-plus in revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories in the fiscal year 2021. Over the next several years, AAPL is on track to generate $50 billion in annual revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories.</p><p><blockquote>家庭可穿戴设备和配件继续追随 Service 的脚步，因为它已成为比 iPad 和 Mac 更大的收入领域。随着苹果观察的推出，这一类别已经从2016年的111.3亿美元增长到2020年的306.2亿美元。在4个财年中，可穿戴家居和配件的收入增加了244.8亿美元（175.06%），并且增长不断扩大。2021年前6个月，家用可穿戴设备和配件创造了208.1亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的67.95%。AAPL 肯定有望在 2021 财年从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生超过 350 亿美元的收入。未来几年，AAPL 有望从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生 500 亿美元的年收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7071ec652302c6cab585fef4c408d65\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> By the end of the Fiscal Year 2025, there is a good chance that Services can generate more than $78 billion, and Wearables Home and Accessories could generate over $44 billion in annual revenue if they both grow at a 10% rate. These two categories are on pace to exceed $100 billion in revenue combined, which could grow into $150 billion annually in the late 2020s. I am shocked investors haven't been piling into AAPL, and it's even more ludicrous that an emphasis on AAPL's numbers isn't being discussed in greater detail. What's AAPL worth down the road when Services reaches $100 billion in revenue and Wearables Home and Accessories reaches $50 billion? Over the past decade, AAPL has continued to innovate and change how technology is used, and to think their best days are behind them is a notion I refuse to believe.</p><p><blockquote>到 2025 财年末，服务很有可能产生超过 780 亿美元的收入，如果家用可穿戴设备和配件都以 10% 的速度增长，则年收入可能超过 440 亿美元。这两个类别的总收入有望超过 1000 亿美元，到 2020 年代末，每年可能会增长到 1500 亿美元。我感到震惊的是，投资者没有大量涌入 AAPL，更可笑的是，对 AAPL 数据的强调没有得到更详细的讨论。当服务收入达到 1000 亿美元，家用可穿戴设备和配件收入达到 500 亿美元时，AAPL 的未来价值是多少？在过去的十年里，AAPL不断创新和改变技术的使用方式，我拒绝相信他们最好的日子已经过去。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62cd231b75d9f875329f6713debe846b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"191\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p> The meme stocks are causing a lot of excitement for some investors while they leave a whole other group shaking their heads. Other than a gamble, I can't understand why people want to invest in AMC when you could buy shares of AAPL on sale. AAPL should have exploded to the upside, but its 2 recent blowout quarters didn't move the needle. I believe it's going to be different once the Q3 numbers are reported. We're going to find out that once again, AAPL continues to buy shares by the billions while reporting that in 9 months, they have generated more net income than all of 2020. In the first 6 months of operations, AAPL has generated $201.02 billion in revenue and $52.39 billion in net income while giving back $53.2 billion in buybacks and dividends. Investors have been granted an opportunity to buy more AAPL before the next leg up. I am a shareholder of AAPL, and I plan on buying more before Q3 earnings.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票给一些投资者带来了极大的兴奋，而他们却让另一大群人摇头。除了赌博之外，我无法理解当你可以购买出售的 AAPL 股票时，为什么人们还要投资 AMC。苹果公司本应暴涨，但其最近两个季度的井喷并没有改变局面。我相信一旦第三季度数据公布，情况就会有所不同。我们将再次发现，AAPL 继续购买数十亿美元的股票，同时报告称，在 9 个月内，他们产生的净利润超过了 2020 年全年。在运营的前6个月，AAPL创造了2010.2亿美元的收入和523.9亿美元的净利润，同时返还了532亿美元的回购和股息。投资者有机会在下一次上涨之前购买更多 AAPL。我是 AAPL 的股东，我计划在第三季度财报公布之前购买更多股票。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4434600-apple-meme-stocks-or-apple-i-choose-apple-every-time\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4434600-apple-meme-stocks-or-apple-i-choose-apple-every-time","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167720481","content_text":"Summary\n\nApple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.\nInvestors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.\nApple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.\nEventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.\n\nNikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nIn 2021, Apple (AAPL) has become a negative returning investment underperforming the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (SPY) by a margin greater than 15%. In May of 2021, one of the hottest fund managers Cathie Wood of Ark Invest, sold nearly 300,000 shares of AAPL from the ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). It was reported that ARK, at one point, was reducing their stake in AAPL to add to their positions in Coinbase (COIN) and DraftKings (DKNG). Actively managed funds such as the one's ARK oversees buy and sell equities daily and could have been using AAPL as an alternative to cash. AAPL has a mixed bag of reviews as some believe its best days are ahead of it while others believe the glory days won't be reclaimed. I think the market is granting investors an opportunity as AAPL should breakout from its sideways pattern in the 2ndhalf of 2021.\nThe market wasn't impressed by the blowout AAPL delivered in Q1 and Q2. Instead of an upside climb supported by fundamentals, shares of AAPL have been treading water. As an AAPL bull, it's perplexing that so much attention is placed on meme stocks instead of companies such as AAPL when it's setting the stage for their best year ever. After reading the comments of the recent articles on MEME stocks, I have written, then looking back at the comment sections of some AAPL articles, I just don't understand how the mindset is shifting to outright speculation & gambling rather than investing. In the first 2 quarters of the fiscal year, 2021 AAPL has generated $3.08 in EPS while the entire 2020 fiscal year delivered $3.31 in EPS. AAPL is solidifying the foundation for its best year ever in many metrics, yet the market isn't impressed. I believe there will be impressive fireworks in the 2ndhalf of 2021, and patient shareholders will be rewarded as Q3 and Q4 numbers are reported.\n(Source: Seeking Alpha)\nApple believes it's the best investment in the market and puts their money where their mouth is\nSo what does AAPL do with all of the cash it generates? For starters, they spend tens of billions annually building out their businesses while investing in research and development [R&D]. In 2020, AAPL spent $169.56 billion on their cost of generating revenue. The fruits of their labor can be seen in their product offerings and how quickly their newest business segments, including services and wearables, Home, and accessories, have grown. AAPL allocated $18.75 billion in 2020 to R&D, generating advancements to their beloved products. One of the reasons AAPL has a cliental that could resemble a cult-like mentality is because AAPL doesn't stop innovating. They are always at the forefront pushing the boundaries of how technology can enhance an individual's daily life.\nSo what about the remaining cash after AAPL's business expenses are fulfilled? AAPL bets on themselves and views their stock as an investment. Since the fiscal year 2012, AAPL has repurchased $421.7 billion in its own stock. In 2021 AAPL has repurchased $43 billion in stock, indicating that senior leadership believes there is tremendous value in owning shares of AAPL. I remember the days where everyone got excited when insiders purchased shares of their company. For AAPL buying back stock is just an ordinary Monday. AAPL has repurchased more in stock over the past decade than most companies will ever see their market caps grow to. AAPL's board authorized an additional $90 billion to its existing share repurchase plan, and AAPL returned almost $23 billion in capital to shareholders in Q2 2021, it doesn't get more bullish than that.\n(Source: Apple)\nMeme stocks vs. Apple and the insanity of this market\nGameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) have decimated AAPL in share price appreciation throughout the first half of 2021. Regardless of why GME and AMC are up, the fact of the matter is GME has generated a return that exceeds 1,100%, and AMC has returned over 2,000%. Anyone who has ridden GME or AMC up, I congratulate and tip my hat to you. The market is being fueled by delusions of grandeur as AAPL is negative for the year, yet GME & AMC have absolutely exploded to the upside.\n(Source: Seeking Alpha)\nWhat's changed for AMC in the past several months? I can tell you, not a single thing. AMC is still a company that is in the red and barely makes money. I get it investing in companies like AMC can generate huge returns due to volatility, and I am not knocking it. If you can make money on it, by all means, don't let anyone stand in your way but be careful. When you read through AMC's income statement, they have never exceeded $400 million in net income. In the past decade, AMC's most profitable year was 2013, as their net income was $364.4 million. In 2019 which had zero ramifications from COVID, AMC generated $5.47 billion in revenue and couldn't even turn a profit as they lost -$149.1 million. AMC's last quarterly report had -$2.3 billion in equity on its balance sheet. The reality is AMC can issue additional shares and sell them to raise capital. This would benefit AMC by improving its balance sheet and increase its cash on hand. It seems like people don't understand that when a company issues more shares, the initial batch becomes diluted and is worthless because of the additional supply. AMC can issue shares and strengthen its balance sheet, but it won't solve its profit problems. AAPL pays more in dividends to its shareholders every quarter than the profit AMC has generated in the past decade, yet AMC is the stock generating larger returns.\nWhen investors purchase shares of AMC, they are buying a company with negative EPS. AMC's P/E ratio isn't measurable on a trailing twelve-month or a forward basis, yet investors are willing to pay for nonexistent earnings. In the comments of my AMC article, people said fundamentals don't matter. I understand that AMC has been a technical trade, but that doesn't change the reality that investors are paying for a company with negative earnings.Currently, the average PE Ratio for the S&P is 45.02. If I use the EPS AAPL generated in the first 6 months of the fiscal year 2021 of $3.08, their PE Ratio would be 40.55. For the TTM, AAPL has generated $4.49 in EPS, which brings their PE Ratio down to 28.09. Currently, investors are paying $28.09 for every $1 in earnings AAPL generates, which is low for the tech industry.Amazon (AMZN) has a PE of 62.44,Microsoft (MSFT)34.93, and Google (GOOGL)of 32.05. Call me old-fashioned, but I like to invest in companies that turn a profit.\n(Source:multpl.com)\nLaying out the bull case for Apple and why a breakout to the upside is inevitable\nAAPL has a cult-like following that gravitates to its products and services. For the first 6 months of 2021,AAPLhas generated $201.02 billion in revenue, $82.41 billion in gross profit, and $52.39 billion in net income. In 2021 AAPL has already generated 73.23% ($201.02 billion) of 2020's total revenue, then 78.51% of 2020's gross income ($82.41 billion) and 91.25% of 2020's total net income ($52.39 billion). AAPL is on track to decimate its previous records, and unless something unfathomable occurs, 2021 will be AAPL's best year ever.\nSo the real questions are what's causing the surge in AAPL's financials, and are they sustainable? Part of the reason is AAPL has seen an increase in its hardware sales from iPhone 12's down to iPads. An argument can be made that many people needed to upgrade their technology during the pandemic due to working from home or remote learning, but that logic can't be used for 2021. At the end of April, when AAPL reported Q2,their iPhone sales exceeded expectations by $7.14 billion, Mac sales by $2.2 billion, and iPad sales by $2.01 billion. These numbers were a year later, and while the iPhone 12, which was AAPL's first 5G release, was expected to create tailwinds, I believe the pandemic pushed society into a place where a greater emphasis is placed on technology.\nI believe AAPL will continue to see strong hardware sales, but that's only one piece of the puzzle. Services and Wearables Home and Accessories are becoming huge components of AAPL's financial metrics. In 2018 Services generated $39.75 billion in revenue. In 2019 Services increased by $6.54 billion (16.46%) as they finished the year with $46.29 billion in revenue. In 2020 Services grew by $7.48 billion (16.15%) as its revenue totaled $53.77 billion. In the first 6 months of 2020, Services has already generated $32.66 billion in revenue, which is 60.75% of 2020's total revenue. Services continue to grow creating a true business segment of reoccurring revenue for AAPL. The beauty of Services is with each piece of hardware AAPL sells; there is an opportunity to generate additional revenue through Services every month.\nServices are becoming a home run for AAPL as it diversifies its revenue mix away from being solely constructed from physical products. At the close of the fiscal year 2020, Services had increased its annual revenue by $29.42 billion (120.83%) in just 4 years. In the first 6 months of 2021, Services has generated $32.66 billion, which is 60% of 2020's annual revenue. AAPL is on track to crack $60 billion in revenue from Services in the fiscal year 2021. Looking further out, Services could be a $100 billion revenue generator in the not-too-distant future.\n(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)\nWearables Home and Accessories continues to follow in Service's footsteps as it has become a larger revenue segment than iPad and Mac. With the inception of the Apple Watch, this category has grown from generating $11.13 billion in 2016 to $30.62 billion in 2020. Over 4 fiscal years, Wearables Home and Accessories has increased its revenue by $24.48 billion (175.06%), and its growth keeps expanding. In the first 6 months of 2021, Wearables Home and Accessories have generated $20.81 billion in revenue, which is 67.95% of 2020's total revenue. AAPL is certainly on track to generate $35 billion-plus in revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories in the fiscal year 2021. Over the next several years, AAPL is on track to generate $50 billion in annual revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories.\n(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)\nBy the end of the Fiscal Year 2025, there is a good chance that Services can generate more than $78 billion, and Wearables Home and Accessories could generate over $44 billion in annual revenue if they both grow at a 10% rate. These two categories are on pace to exceed $100 billion in revenue combined, which could grow into $150 billion annually in the late 2020s. I am shocked investors haven't been piling into AAPL, and it's even more ludicrous that an emphasis on AAPL's numbers isn't being discussed in greater detail. What's AAPL worth down the road when Services reaches $100 billion in revenue and Wearables Home and Accessories reaches $50 billion? Over the past decade, AAPL has continued to innovate and change how technology is used, and to think their best days are behind them is a notion I refuse to believe.\n(Source: Apple)\nConclusion\nThe meme stocks are causing a lot of excitement for some investors while they leave a whole other group shaking their heads. Other than a gamble, I can't understand why people want to invest in AMC when you could buy shares of AAPL on sale. AAPL should have exploded to the upside, but its 2 recent blowout quarters didn't move the needle. I believe it's going to be different once the Q3 numbers are reported. We're going to find out that once again, AAPL continues to buy shares by the billions while reporting that in 9 months, they have generated more net income than all of 2020. In the first 6 months of operations, AAPL has generated $201.02 billion in revenue and $52.39 billion in net income while giving back $53.2 billion in buybacks and dividends. Investors have been granted an opportunity to buy more AAPL before the next leg up. I am a shareholder of AAPL, and I plan on buying more before Q3 earnings.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1964,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187866308,"gmtCreate":1623749520604,"gmtModify":1634029122788,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice man","listText":"Nice man","text":"Nice man","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187866308","repostId":"1102470114","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2152,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187889885,"gmtCreate":1623749197847,"gmtModify":1634029133503,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice piece of news!","listText":"Nice piece of news!","text":"Nice piece of news!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187889885","repostId":"1119457448","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2129,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327334390,"gmtCreate":1616058090510,"gmtModify":1703496997409,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327334390","repostId":"1102384412","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2054,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325463826,"gmtCreate":1615914784765,"gmtModify":1703495046565,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Oof","listText":"Oof","text":"Oof","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325463826","repostId":"1115937529","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2527,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325636335,"gmtCreate":1615892759427,"gmtModify":1703494575364,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325636335","repostId":"1130270839","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130270839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615887302,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1130270839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-16 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The U.S. Is Trying to Fix the Chip Shortage. What It Could Mean for Semiconductor Stocks<blockquote>美国正试图解决芯片短缺问题。这对半导体股票意味着什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130270839","media":"Barrons","summary":"As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur","content":"<p>As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, a J.P. Morgan analyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.</p><p><blockquote>随着美国政府越来越接近为一系列旨在刺激国内半导体制造和研究的激励措施和补贴提供资金，摩根大通分析师已经弄清楚哪些股票可能从中受益最大。</blockquote></p><p>Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as natural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed&nbsp;to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.</p><p><blockquote>全球芯片短缺的部分原因是 Covid-19 大流行以及自然灾害导致的供需波动，国会今年早些时候批准了一系列针对美国芯片公司的计划和激励措施。立法者们将旨在支持美国制造业、研发的计划纳入了 2021 财年国防授权法案，该法案于 1 月份成为法律，但并未为这些举措提供资金。</blockquote></p><p>According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通芯片分析师哈兰-苏尔（Harlan Sur）认为，这些项目的资金很可能会被纳入乔-拜登总统的基础设施法案，这是政府的下一个优先事项之一。苏尔预计 “重建得更好 ”基础设施计划将于今年上半年获得通过，资金将于 2021 年下半年开始发放。</blockquote></p><p>Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔的团队估计，激励和补贴总额可能在 350 亿至 370 亿美元之间，其中约 180 亿至 200 亿美元用于国内芯片制造，150 亿至 170 亿美元用于芯片研发。</blockquote></p><p>Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.</p><p><blockquote>根据《国防授权法案》目前的措辞，苏尔在周一发表的一份说明中写道，他预计在发放资金和激励措施时，美国的集成设备制造商可能会被优先考虑。</blockquote></p><p>Those would include manufacturers such as Intel (ticker: INTC), Micron Technology (MU), Texas Instruments (TXN), Analog Devices (ADI), and On Semiconductor (ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔写道，其中包括英特尔（股票代码：INTC）、美光科技（MU）、德州仪器（TXN）、模拟器件（ADI）和安森美半导体（ON）等制造商都可能受益。他写道，拥有美国国防相关资质的公司也处于有利地位，可以从中受益。他表示，在美国运营的国际芯片制造商台积电 (TSM) 和恩智浦半导体 (NXPI) 也应该受益，但程度较小。</blockquote></p><p>Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.</p><p><blockquote>Applied Materials (AMAT) 和 Lam Research (LRCX) 等芯片制造设备制造公司也应该受到提振，因为激励措施导致设备采购增加。</blockquote></p><p>The PHLX Semiconductor index, or Sox, advanced nearly 2% on Monday, led by NXP Semiconductors NXP, which rose 8.8% to $199.57, and Broadcom (AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.66.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX 半导体指数 (Sox) 周一上涨近 2%，其中恩智浦半导体 NXP 上涨 8.8%，至 199.57 美元，博通 (AVGO) 上涨 4.3%，至 470.66 美元。</blockquote></p><p>The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as demand for chips destined for products ranging from appliances and videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.</p><p><blockquote>由于从家电、视频游戏机到汽车和智能手机等产品对芯片的需求已经超过了半导体行业的生产能力，Sox 在过去一年中上涨了 94%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The U.S. Is Trying to Fix the Chip Shortage. What It Could Mean for Semiconductor Stocks<blockquote>美国正试图解决芯片短缺问题。这对半导体股票意味着什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe U.S. Is Trying to Fix the Chip Shortage. What It Could Mean for Semiconductor Stocks<blockquote>美国正试图解决芯片短缺问题。这对半导体股票意味着什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-16 17:35</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, a J.P. Morgan analyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.</p><p><blockquote>随着美国政府越来越接近为一系列旨在刺激国内半导体制造和研究的激励措施和补贴提供资金，摩根大通分析师已经弄清楚哪些股票可能从中受益最大。</blockquote></p><p>Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as natural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed&nbsp;to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.</p><p><blockquote>全球芯片短缺的部分原因是 Covid-19 大流行以及自然灾害导致的供需波动，国会今年早些时候批准了一系列针对美国芯片公司的计划和激励措施。立法者们将旨在支持美国制造业、研发的计划纳入了 2021 财年国防授权法案，该法案于 1 月份成为法律，但并未为这些举措提供资金。</blockquote></p><p>According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通芯片分析师哈兰-苏尔（Harlan Sur）认为，这些项目的资金很可能会被纳入乔-拜登总统的基础设施法案，这是政府的下一个优先事项之一。苏尔预计 “重建得更好 ”基础设施计划将于今年上半年获得通过，资金将于 2021 年下半年开始发放。</blockquote></p><p>Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔的团队估计，激励和补贴总额可能在 350 亿至 370 亿美元之间，其中约 180 亿至 200 亿美元用于国内芯片制造，150 亿至 170 亿美元用于芯片研发。</blockquote></p><p>Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.</p><p><blockquote>根据《国防授权法案》目前的措辞，苏尔在周一发表的一份说明中写道，他预计在发放资金和激励措施时，美国的集成设备制造商可能会被优先考虑。</blockquote></p><p>Those would include manufacturers such as Intel (ticker: INTC), Micron Technology (MU), Texas Instruments (TXN), Analog Devices (ADI), and On Semiconductor (ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔写道，其中包括英特尔（股票代码：INTC）、美光科技（MU）、德州仪器（TXN）、模拟器件（ADI）和安森美半导体（ON）等制造商都可能受益。他写道，拥有美国国防相关资质的公司也处于有利地位，可以从中受益。他表示，在美国运营的国际芯片制造商台积电 (TSM) 和恩智浦半导体 (NXPI) 也应该受益，但程度较小。</blockquote></p><p>Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.</p><p><blockquote>Applied Materials (AMAT) 和 Lam Research (LRCX) 等芯片制造设备制造公司也应该受到提振，因为激励措施导致设备采购增加。</blockquote></p><p>The PHLX Semiconductor index, or Sox, advanced nearly 2% on Monday, led by NXP Semiconductors NXP, which rose 8.8% to $199.57, and Broadcom (AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.66.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX 半导体指数 (Sox) 周一上涨近 2%，其中恩智浦半导体 NXP 上涨 8.8%，至 199.57 美元，博通 (AVGO) 上涨 4.3%，至 470.66 美元。</blockquote></p><p>The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as demand for chips destined for products ranging from appliances and videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.</p><p><blockquote>由于从家电、视频游戏机到汽车和智能手机等产品对芯片的需求已经超过了半导体行业的生产能力，Sox 在过去一年中上涨了 94%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-u-s-is-trying-to-fix-the-chip-shortage-what-it-could-mean-for-semiconductor-stocks-51615838286?mod=hp_DAY_2\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-u-s-is-trying-to-fix-the-chip-shortage-what-it-could-mean-for-semiconductor-stocks-51615838286?mod=hp_DAY_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130270839","content_text":"As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, a J.P. Morgan analyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as natural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.Those would include manufacturers such as Intel (ticker: INTC), Micron Technology (MU), Texas Instruments (TXN), Analog Devices (ADI), and On Semiconductor (ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.The PHLX Semiconductor index, or Sox, advanced nearly 2% on Monday, led by NXP Semiconductors NXP, which rose 8.8% to $199.57, and Broadcom (AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.66.The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as demand for chips destined for products ranging from appliances and videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2121,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325638444,"gmtCreate":1615892741788,"gmtModify":1703494574850,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Thats right&nbsp;","listText":"Thats right&nbsp;","text":"Thats right","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325638444","repostId":"1164075443","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325633724,"gmtCreate":1615892620268,"gmtModify":1703494571769,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577487093536782","idStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325633724","repostId":"1164075443","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":325638444,"gmtCreate":1615892741788,"gmtModify":1703494574850,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Thats right&nbsp;","listText":"Thats right&nbsp;","text":"Thats right","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325638444","repostId":"1164075443","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327334390,"gmtCreate":1616058090510,"gmtModify":1703496997409,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327334390","repostId":"1102384412","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102384412","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616057894,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1102384412?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-18 16:58","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"ByteDance on hiring spree in Singapore, says FT<blockquote>英国《金融时报》称字节跳动在新加坡的招聘热潮</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102384412","media":"Businesstimes","summary":"TIKTOK owner ByteDance has embarked on a hiring spree in Singapore, posting 338 jobs in the city sta","content":"<p><div> TIKTOK owner ByteDance has embarked on a hiring spree in Singapore, posting 338 jobs in the city state in the past six months, Financial Times (FT) reported on Thursday. The Beijing-based company is ...</p><p><blockquote><div>据英国《金融时报》（FT）周四报道，TIKTOK 所有者字节跳动已在新加坡掀起招聘热潮，过去六个月在新加坡发布了 338 个职位空缺。这家总部位于北京的公司……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technology/bytedance-on-hiring-spree-in-singapore-says-ft\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technology/bytedance-on-hiring-spree-in-singapore-says-ft\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1607307803821","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ByteDance on hiring spree in Singapore, says FT<blockquote>英国《金融时报》称字节跳动在新加坡的招聘热潮</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nByteDance on hiring spree in Singapore, says FT<blockquote>英国《金融时报》称字节跳动在新加坡的招聘热潮</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Businesstimes</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-18 16:58</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> TIKTOK owner ByteDance has embarked on a hiring spree in Singapore, posting 338 jobs in the city state in the past six months, Financial Times (FT) reported on Thursday. The Beijing-based company is ...</p><p><blockquote><div>据英国《金融时报》（FT）周四报道，TIKTOK 所有者字节跳动已在新加坡掀起招聘热潮，过去六个月在新加坡发布了 338 个职位空缺。这家总部位于北京的公司……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technology/bytedance-on-hiring-spree-in-singapore-says-ft\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technology/bytedance-on-hiring-spree-in-singapore-says-ft\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technology/bytedance-on-hiring-spree-in-singapore-says-ft\">Businesstimes</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technology/bytedance-on-hiring-spree-in-singapore-says-ft","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102384412","content_text":"TIKTOK owner ByteDance has embarked on a hiring spree in Singapore, posting 338 jobs in the city state in the past six months, Financial Times (FT) reported on Thursday.\nThe Beijing-based company is hiring hundreds of engineers and senior management positions in Singapore for TikTok, its enterprise software business Lark and other products.\nByteDance moved into bigger premises in Singapore last year, taking up three floors at One Raffles Quay.\nThe firm has not confirmed which international office would be its global hub outside China, but a lawyer who helped advise ByteDance on its new Singapore office space said it \"had all the hallmarks of a global hub\", said the report. He added: \"ByteDance seems to be spending more on this office than any other outside of China.\"\nThe company's expansion into Singapore comes amid setbacks in India, the US and Britain, where it has been blocked or accused of breaching privacy regulations.\n\"I think they are hedging their bets, given the rapidly evolving regulatory environment,\" said a Singapore-based consultant.\nThe Singapore hiring spree will also support ByteDance's push into South-east Asia, the report said.\nThe company has created an education portal to test out a seller marketplace in Indonesia, the region's biggest e-commerce market.\nWithin the South-east Asia market, Singapore is seen as \"neutral\" ground that is viewed more favourably by regulators, said Jayanth Kolla, technology analyst at Bengaluru-based consultancy Convergence Catalyst.\n\"Singapore is increasingly becoming, for all practical purposes, the official South Asia and South-east Asia hub,\" he added. \"The government has been accommodating and is jumping on the opportunity.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2054,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325633724,"gmtCreate":1615892620268,"gmtModify":1703494571769,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325633724","repostId":"1164075443","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187864865,"gmtCreate":1623749605657,"gmtModify":1634029120309,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Oh yes thats good","listText":"Oh yes thats good","text":"Oh yes thats good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187864865","repostId":"1167720481","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167720481","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623723356,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1167720481?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-15 10:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple: Meme Stocks Or Apple, I Choose Apple Every Time<blockquote>苹果：模因股票还是苹果，我每次都选择苹果</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167720481","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Apple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.Investors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.Apple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.Eventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.So what does AAPL do with all of the cash","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Apple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.</li>  <li>Investors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.</li>  <li>Apple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.</li>  <li>Eventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54c3b80a3353ef82f618688f13f74658\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Nikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>苹果在2021年一直是一项负面投资，而模因股票却爆炸式增长，这是荒谬的。</li><li>投资者有机会在苹果下一次上涨之前购买它，而注意力已转移到追逐模因股票的快速收益。</li><li>苹果预计 2021 财年收入将超过 3000 亿美元，净利润将达到 750 亿美元。</li><li>最终，苹果将被重新投入到党中，他们的数字将被庆祝。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Nikada/iStock 未通过 Getty Images 发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In 2021, Apple (AAPL) has become a negative returning investment underperforming the SPDR S&amp;P 500 Trust ETF (SPY) by a margin greater than 15%. In May of 2021, one of the hottest fund managers&nbsp;Cathie Wood&nbsp;of&nbsp;Ark Invest, sold nearly 300,000 shares of AAPL from the ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). It was reported that ARK, at one point, was reducing their stake in AAPL to add to their positions in&nbsp;Coinbase (COIN) and DraftKings (DKNG). Actively managed funds such as the one's ARK oversees buy and sell equities daily and could have been using AAPL as an alternative to cash. AAPL has a mixed bag of reviews as some believe its best days are ahead of it while others believe the glory days won't be reclaimed. I think the market is granting investors an opportunity as AAPL should breakout from its sideways pattern in the 2ndhalf of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>2021年，苹果（AAPL）已成为负回报投资，其表现逊于SPDR标普500信托ETF（SPDR标普500指数ETF）超过15%。2021 年 5 月，Ark Invest 最热门的基金经理之一 Cathie Wood 从 Ark Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) 中出售了近 300,000 股 AAPL 股票。据报道，ARK 一度减持 AAPL 股份，以增加其在 Coinbase (COIN) 和 DraftKings (DKNG) 的头寸。one’s ARK 等主动管理基金每天监督股票的买卖，并可能使用 AAPL 作为现金的替代品。AAPL 的评论褒贬不一，一些人认为其最好的日子还在后头，而另一些人则认为辉煌的日子将无法重现。我认为市场正在给投资者一个机会，因为苹果公司应该会在 2021 年下半年摆脱横盘整理模式。</blockquote></p><p> The market wasn't impressed by the blowout AAPL delivered in Q1 and Q2. Instead of an upside climb supported by fundamentals, shares of AAPL have been treading water. As an AAPL bull, it's perplexing that so much attention is placed on meme stocks instead of companies such as AAPL when it's setting the stage for their best year ever. After reading the comments of the recent articles on MEME stocks, I have written, then looking back at the comment sections of some AAPL articles, I just don't understand how the mindset is shifting to outright speculation &amp; gambling rather than investing. In the first 2 quarters of the fiscal year, 2021 AAPL has generated $3.08 in EPS while the entire 2020 fiscal year delivered $3.31 in EPS. AAPL is solidifying the foundation for its best year ever in many metrics, yet the market isn't impressed. I believe there will be impressive fireworks in the 2ndhalf of 2021, and patient shareholders will be rewarded as Q3 and Q4 numbers are reported.</p><p><blockquote>市场对 AAPL 在第一季度和第二季度的井喷并没有留下深刻印象。AAPL 股价并没有在基本面支撑下上涨，而是一直在下跌。作为一名 AAPL 多头，令人困惑的是，当 AAPL 等公司正在为其有史以来最好的一年奠定基础时，如此多的注意力却集中在模因股票上，而不是像 AAPL 这样的公司上。在阅读了最近关于模因股票的文章的评论后，我写道，然后回顾一些AAPL文章的评论部分，我只是不明白心态是如何转向彻底的投机和赌博而不是投资的。在本财年的前两个季度，AAPL 的每股收益为 3.08 美元，而整个 2020 财年的每股收益为 3.31 美元。AAPL 在许多指标上都在巩固其有史以来最好的一年的基础，但市场并没有留下深刻印象。我相信2021年下半年将会有令人印象深刻的烟火，随着第三季度和第四季度数据的公布，耐心的股东将会得到回报。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e86cb02096dfa9c6da05e350f274aa64\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"556\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple believes it's the best investment in the market and puts their money where their mouth is</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果相信这是市场上最好的投资，并说到做到</b></blockquote></p><p> So what does AAPL do with all of the cash it generates? For starters, they spend tens of billions annually building out their businesses while investing in research and development [R&amp;D]. In&nbsp;2020, AAPL spent $169.56 billion on their cost of generating revenue. The fruits of their labor can be seen in their product offerings and how quickly their newest business segments, including services and wearables, Home, and accessories, have grown. AAPL allocated $18.75 billion in 2020 to R&amp;D, generating advancements to their beloved products. One of the reasons AAPL has a cliental that could resemble a cult-like mentality is because AAPL doesn't stop innovating. They are always at the forefront pushing the boundaries of how technology can enhance an individual's daily life.</p><p><blockquote>那么，AAPL如何处理它产生的所有现金呢？首先，他们每年花费数百亿美元来发展业务，同时投资于研发[R&amp;D]。2020年，AAPL在创收成本上花费了1695.6亿美元。他们的劳动成果可以从他们的产品以及他们最新的业务部门（包括服务和可穿戴设备、家居和配件）的增长速度中看出。AAPL在2020年拨款187.5亿美元用于研发，为他们心爱的产品带来了进步。AAPL拥有类似于邪教心态的客户群的原因之一是因为AAPL没有停止创新。他们总是站在技术如何改善个人日常生活的最前沿。</blockquote></p><p> So what about the remaining cash after AAPL's business expenses are fulfilled? AAPL bets on themselves and views their stock as an investment. Since the fiscal year 2012, AAPL has repurchased $421.7 billion in its own stock. In 2021 AAPL has repurchased $43 billion in stock, indicating that senior leadership believes there is tremendous value in owning shares of AAPL. I remember the days where everyone got excited when insiders purchased shares of their company. For AAPL buying back stock is just an ordinary Monday. AAPL has repurchased more in stock over the past decade than most companies will ever see their market caps grow to. AAPL's&nbsp;board&nbsp;authorized an additional $90 billion to its existing share repurchase plan, and AAPL returned almost&nbsp;$23 billion&nbsp;in capital to shareholders in Q2 2021, it doesn't get more bullish than that.</p><p><blockquote>那么AAPL的业务费用兑现后剩余的现金怎么办呢？AAPL 押注于自己，并将其股票视为一项投资。自2012财年以来，AAPL已回购了4217亿美元的自有股票。2021年，AAPL回购了430亿美元的股票，表明高层领导认为拥有AAPL股票具有巨大的价值。我记得当内部人士购买他们公司股票时，每个人都很兴奋的日子。对于 AAPL 来说，回购股票只是一个普通的星期一。过去十年，苹果公司回购的股票数量超过了大多数公司的市值增长。AAPL 董事会授权向其现有股票回购计划追加 900 亿美元，AAPL 在 2021 年第二季度向股东返还了近 230 亿美元的资本，没有比这更乐观的了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3dbaf61374104ed17e51201af591ab7d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"349\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Meme stocks vs. Apple and the insanity of this market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>模因股票与苹果以及这个市场的疯狂</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> GameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) have decimated AAPL in share price appreciation throughout the first half of 2021. Regardless of why GME and AMC are up, the fact of the matter is GME has generated a return that exceeds 1,100%, and AMC has returned over 2,000%. Anyone who has ridden GME or AMC up, I congratulate and tip my hat to you. The market is being fueled by delusions of grandeur as AAPL is negative for the year, yet GME &amp; AMC have absolutely exploded to the upside.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站 (GME) 和AMC院线控股公司 (AMC) 在 2021 年上半年的股价升值幅度大幅削弱了 AAPL。不管GME和AMC为什么上涨，事实是GME的回报率超过了1,100%，AMC的回报率超过了2,000%。任何骑过 GME 或 AMC 的人，我都向你们表示祝贺并脱帽致敬。由于 AAPL 今年表现不佳，市场受到了宏伟错觉的推动，而 GME 和 AMC 却绝对上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c85258331453c02381346f8b6c676cec\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"499\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> What's changed for AMC in the past several months? I can tell you, not a single thing. AMC is still a company that is in the red and barely makes money. I get it investing in companies like AMC can generate huge returns due to volatility, and I am not knocking it. If you can make money on it, by all means, don't let anyone stand in your way but be careful. When you read through&nbsp;AMC's income statement, they have never exceeded $400 million in net income. In the past decade, AMC's most profitable year was 2013, as their net income was $364.4 million. In 2019 which had zero ramifications from COVID, AMC generated $5.47 billion in revenue and couldn't even turn a profit as they lost -$149.1 million. AMC's last quarterly report had -$2.3 billion in equity on its balance sheet. The reality is AMC can issue additional shares and sell them to raise capital. This would benefit AMC by improving its balance sheet and increase its cash on hand. It seems like people don't understand that when a company issues more shares, the initial batch becomes diluted and is worthless because of the additional supply. AMC can issue shares and strengthen its balance sheet, but it won't solve its profit problems. AAPL pays more in dividends to its shareholders every quarter than the profit AMC has generated in the past decade, yet AMC is the stock generating larger returns.</p><p><blockquote>过去几个月AMC发生了什么变化？我可以告诉你，一件事都没有。AMC仍然是一家亏损的公司，几乎不赚钱。我明白投资像 AMC 这样的公司可以由于波动性而产生巨大回报，我并没有否认这一点。如果你能在上面赚钱，无论如何，不要让任何人挡你的路，但要小心。当你通读AMC的损益表时，他们的净利润从未超过4亿美元。在过去十年中，AMC最赚钱的一年是2013年，净利润为3.644亿美元。2019 年，由于 COVID 的影响为零，AMC 创造了 54.7 亿美元的收入，但甚至无法盈利，因为他们亏损了 1.491 亿美元。AMC 上一季度报告显示其资产负债表上的股本为 -23 亿美元。现实情况是，AMC 可以发行额外股票并出售以筹集资金。这将使 AMC 受益，改善其资产负债表并增加手头现金。人们似乎不明白，当一家公司发行更多股票时，最初的一批股票会因为额外的供应量而被稀释，变得一文不值。AMC可以发行股票并加强其资产负债表，但这并不能解决其利润问题。AAPL 每个季度向股东支付的股息比 AMC 过去十年产生的利润还要多，但 AMC 是产生更大回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p> When investors purchase shares of AMC, they are buying a company with negative EPS. AMC's P/E ratio isn't measurable on a trailing twelve-month or a forward basis, yet investors are willing to pay for nonexistent earnings. In the comments of my&nbsp;AMC article, people said fundamentals don't matter. I understand that AMC has been a technical trade, but that doesn't change the reality that investors are paying for a company with negative earnings.Currently, the average PE Ratio for the S&amp;P is 45.02. If I use the EPS AAPL generated in the first 6 months of the fiscal year 2021 of $3.08, their PE Ratio would be 40.55. For the TTM, AAPL has generated $4.49 in EPS, which brings their PE Ratio down to 28.09. Currently, investors are paying $28.09 for every $1 in earnings AAPL generates, which is low for the tech industry.Amazon (AMZN)&nbsp;has a PE of 62.44,Microsoft (MSFT)34.93, and&nbsp;Google (GOOGL)of 32.05. Call me old-fashioned, but I like to invest in companies that turn a profit.</p><p><blockquote>当投资者购买 AMC 股票时，他们购买的是一家每股收益为负的公司。AMC 的市盈率无法在过去 12 个月或远期基础上衡量，但投资者愿意为不存在的收益买单。在我的AMC文章的评论中，人们说基本面并不重要。我知道 AMC 一直是一项技术性交易，但这并不能改变投资者为负收益公司买单的现实。目前，标准普尔的平均市盈率为45.02。如果我使用 AAPL 在 2021 财年前 6 个月产生的每股收益 3.08 美元，他们的市盈率将为 40.55。对于 TTM，AAPL 的每股收益为 4.49 美元，这使得他们的市盈率降至 28.09。目前，投资者为 AAPL 每产生 1 美元的收益支付 28.09 美元，这对于科技行业来说是较低的。亚马逊 (AMZN) 的市盈率为 62.44，微软 (MSFT) 为 34.93，谷歌 (GOOGL) 为 32.05。看涨期权我很守旧，但我喜欢投资盈利的公司。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79e06d9bc68454731c984429111ff056\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"661\"><span>(Source:multpl.com)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：multpl.com）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Laying out the bull case for Apple and why a breakout to the upside is inevitable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>阐述苹果的牛市理由以及为什么突破上行是不可避免的</b></blockquote></p><p> AAPL has a cult-like following that gravitates to its products and services. For the first 6 months of 2021,AAPLhas generated $201.02 billion in revenue, $82.41 billion in gross profit, and $52.39 billion in net income. In 2021 AAPL has already generated 73.23% ($201.02 billion) of 2020's total revenue, then 78.51% of 2020's gross income ($82.41 billion) and 91.25% of 2020's total net income ($52.39 billion). AAPL is on track to decimate its previous records, and unless something unfathomable occurs, 2021 will be AAPL's best year ever.</p><p><blockquote>AAPL 拥有一批狂热的追随者，他们被其产品和服务所吸引。2021年前6个月，AAPLhas实现收入2010.2亿美元，毛利润824.1亿美元，净利润523.9亿美元。2021年，AAPL已经创造了2020年总收入的73.23%（2010.2亿美元），然后是2020年总收入的78.51%（824.1亿美元）和2020年总净收入的91.25%（523.9亿美元）。AAPL 有望打破其之前的记录，除非发生深不可测的事情，否则 2021 年将是 AAPL 有史以来最好的一年。</blockquote></p><p> So the real questions are what's causing the surge in AAPL's financials, and are they sustainable? Part of the reason is AAPL has seen an increase in its hardware sales from iPhone 12's down to iPads. An argument can be made that many people needed to upgrade their technology during the pandemic due to working from home or remote learning, but that logic can't be used for 2021. At the end of April, when&nbsp;AAPL reported Q2,their iPhone sales exceeded expectations by $7.14 billion, Mac sales by $2.2 billion, and iPad sales by $2.01 billion. These numbers were a year later, and while the iPhone 12, which was AAPL's first 5G release, was expected to create tailwinds, I believe the pandemic pushed society into a place where a greater emphasis is placed on technology.</p><p><blockquote>因此，真正的问题是，是什么导致了 AAPL 财务状况的飙升，以及它们是否可持续？部分原因是苹果公司的硬件销量从 iPhone 12 到 iPad 都有所增长。可以说，由于在家工作或远程学习，许多人在疫情期间需要升级他们的技术，但这种逻辑不能用于2021年。4月底，苹果公司公布第二季度业绩时，其iPhone销售额超出预期71.4亿美元，Mac销售额超出预期22亿美元，iPad销售额超出预期20.1亿美元。这些数字是在一年后公布的，虽然苹果公司发布的第一款 5G 手机 iPhone 12 预计会带来顺风，但我相信疫情将社会推向了一个更加重视技术的地方。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I believe AAPL will continue to see strong hardware sales, but that's only one piece of the puzzle. Services and Wearables Home and Accessories are becoming huge components of AAPL's financial metrics. In&nbsp;2018 Services&nbsp;generated $39.75 billion in revenue. In 2019 Services increased by $6.54 billion (16.46%) as they finished the year with $46.29 billion in revenue. In 2020 Services grew by $7.48 billion (16.15%) as its revenue totaled $53.77 billion. In the first 6 months of 2020, Services has already generated $32.66 billion in revenue, which is 60.75% of 2020's total revenue. Services continue to grow creating a true business segment of reoccurring revenue for AAPL. The beauty of Services is with each piece of hardware AAPL sells; there is an opportunity to generate additional revenue through Services every month.</p><p><blockquote>我相信 AAPL 将继续看到强劲的硬件销售，但这只是难题的一部分。服务、可穿戴设备、家居和配件正在成为 AAPL 财务指标的重要组成部分。2018年，服务业创造了397.5亿美元的收入。2019年，服务业增长了65.4亿美元（16.46%），年收入为462.9亿美元。2020年，服务业增长了74.8亿美元（16.15%），收入总计537.7亿美元。2020年前6个月，服务业已经创造了326.6亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的60.75%。服务持续增长，为 AAPL 创造了一个真正的经常性收入业务部门。服务之美在于AAPL销售的每一件硬件；每个月都有机会通过服务产生额外收入。</blockquote></p><p> Services are becoming a home run for AAPL as it diversifies its revenue mix away from being solely constructed from physical products. At the close of the fiscal year 2020, Services had increased its annual revenue by $29.42 billion (120.83%) in just 4 years. In the first 6 months of 2021, Services has generated $32.66 billion, which is 60% of 2020's annual revenue. AAPL is on track to crack $60 billion in revenue from Services in the fiscal year 2021. Looking further out, Services could be a $100 billion revenue generator in the not-too-distant future.</p><p><blockquote>随着 AAPL 实现收入结构多元化，不再仅仅依赖实体产品，服务正在成为 AAPL 的本垒打。截至 2020 财年末，Services 在短短 4 年内年收入增加了 294.2 亿美元（120.83%）。2021年前6个月，服务业创造了326.6亿美元，占2020年年收入的60%。AAPL 有望在 2021 财年实现 600 亿美元的服务收入。展望未来，在不久的将来，服务业可能会产生 1000 亿美元的收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f044f79f7525038fb94ed27b6a92209\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Wearables Home and Accessories continues to follow in Service's footsteps as it has become a larger revenue segment than iPad and Mac. With the inception of the Apple Watch, this category has grown from generating $11.13 billion in 2016 to $30.62 billion in 2020. Over 4 fiscal years, Wearables Home and Accessories has increased its revenue by $24.48 billion (175.06%), and its growth keeps expanding. In the first 6 months of 2021, Wearables Home and Accessories have generated $20.81 billion in revenue, which is 67.95% of 2020's total revenue. AAPL is certainly on track to generate $35 billion-plus in revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories in the fiscal year 2021. Over the next several years, AAPL is on track to generate $50 billion in annual revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories.</p><p><blockquote>家庭可穿戴设备和配件继续追随 Service 的脚步，因为它已成为比 iPad 和 Mac 更大的收入领域。随着苹果观察的推出，这一类别已经从2016年的111.3亿美元增长到2020年的306.2亿美元。在4个财年中，可穿戴家居和配件的收入增加了244.8亿美元（175.06%），并且增长不断扩大。2021年前6个月，家用可穿戴设备和配件创造了208.1亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的67.95%。AAPL 肯定有望在 2021 财年从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生超过 350 亿美元的收入。未来几年，AAPL 有望从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生 500 亿美元的年收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7071ec652302c6cab585fef4c408d65\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> By the end of the Fiscal Year 2025, there is a good chance that Services can generate more than $78 billion, and Wearables Home and Accessories could generate over $44 billion in annual revenue if they both grow at a 10% rate. These two categories are on pace to exceed $100 billion in revenue combined, which could grow into $150 billion annually in the late 2020s. I am shocked investors haven't been piling into AAPL, and it's even more ludicrous that an emphasis on AAPL's numbers isn't being discussed in greater detail. What's AAPL worth down the road when Services reaches $100 billion in revenue and Wearables Home and Accessories reaches $50 billion? Over the past decade, AAPL has continued to innovate and change how technology is used, and to think their best days are behind them is a notion I refuse to believe.</p><p><blockquote>到 2025 财年末，服务很有可能产生超过 780 亿美元的收入，如果家用可穿戴设备和配件都以 10% 的速度增长，则年收入可能超过 440 亿美元。这两个类别的总收入有望超过 1000 亿美元，到 2020 年代末，每年可能会增长到 1500 亿美元。我感到震惊的是，投资者没有大量涌入 AAPL，更可笑的是，对 AAPL 数据的强调没有得到更详细的讨论。当服务收入达到 1000 亿美元，家用可穿戴设备和配件收入达到 500 亿美元时，AAPL 的未来价值是多少？在过去的十年里，AAPL不断创新和改变技术的使用方式，我拒绝相信他们最好的日子已经过去。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62cd231b75d9f875329f6713debe846b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"191\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p> The meme stocks are causing a lot of excitement for some investors while they leave a whole other group shaking their heads. Other than a gamble, I can't understand why people want to invest in AMC when you could buy shares of AAPL on sale. AAPL should have exploded to the upside, but its 2 recent blowout quarters didn't move the needle. I believe it's going to be different once the Q3 numbers are reported. We're going to find out that once again, AAPL continues to buy shares by the billions while reporting that in 9 months, they have generated more net income than all of 2020. In the first 6 months of operations, AAPL has generated $201.02 billion in revenue and $52.39 billion in net income while giving back $53.2 billion in buybacks and dividends. Investors have been granted an opportunity to buy more AAPL before the next leg up. I am a shareholder of AAPL, and I plan on buying more before Q3 earnings.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票给一些投资者带来了极大的兴奋，而他们却让另一大群人摇头。除了赌博之外，我无法理解当你可以购买出售的 AAPL 股票时，为什么人们还要投资 AMC。苹果公司本应暴涨，但其最近两个季度的井喷并没有改变局面。我相信一旦第三季度数据公布，情况就会有所不同。我们将再次发现，AAPL 继续购买数十亿美元的股票，同时报告称，在 9 个月内，他们产生的净利润超过了 2020 年全年。在运营的前6个月，AAPL创造了2010.2亿美元的收入和523.9亿美元的净利润，同时返还了532亿美元的回购和股息。投资者有机会在下一次上涨之前购买更多 AAPL。我是 AAPL 的股东，我计划在第三季度财报公布之前购买更多股票。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple: Meme Stocks Or Apple, I Choose Apple Every Time<blockquote>苹果：模因股票还是苹果，我每次都选择苹果</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple: Meme Stocks Or Apple, I Choose Apple Every Time<blockquote>苹果：模因股票还是苹果，我每次都选择苹果</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 10:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Apple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.</li>  <li>Investors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.</li>  <li>Apple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.</li>  <li>Eventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54c3b80a3353ef82f618688f13f74658\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Nikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>苹果在2021年一直是一项负面投资，而模因股票却爆炸式增长，这是荒谬的。</li><li>投资者有机会在苹果下一次上涨之前购买它，而注意力已转移到追逐模因股票的快速收益。</li><li>苹果预计 2021 财年收入将超过 3000 亿美元，净利润将达到 750 亿美元。</li><li>最终，苹果将被重新投入到党中，他们的数字将被庆祝。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Nikada/iStock 未通过 Getty Images 发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In 2021, Apple (AAPL) has become a negative returning investment underperforming the SPDR S&amp;P 500 Trust ETF (SPY) by a margin greater than 15%. In May of 2021, one of the hottest fund managers&nbsp;Cathie Wood&nbsp;of&nbsp;Ark Invest, sold nearly 300,000 shares of AAPL from the ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). It was reported that ARK, at one point, was reducing their stake in AAPL to add to their positions in&nbsp;Coinbase (COIN) and DraftKings (DKNG). Actively managed funds such as the one's ARK oversees buy and sell equities daily and could have been using AAPL as an alternative to cash. AAPL has a mixed bag of reviews as some believe its best days are ahead of it while others believe the glory days won't be reclaimed. I think the market is granting investors an opportunity as AAPL should breakout from its sideways pattern in the 2ndhalf of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>2021年，苹果（AAPL）已成为负回报投资，其表现逊于SPDR标普500信托ETF（SPDR标普500指数ETF）超过15%。2021 年 5 月，Ark Invest 最热门的基金经理之一 Cathie Wood 从 Ark Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) 中出售了近 300,000 股 AAPL 股票。据报道，ARK 一度减持 AAPL 股份，以增加其在 Coinbase (COIN) 和 DraftKings (DKNG) 的头寸。one’s ARK 等主动管理基金每天监督股票的买卖，并可能使用 AAPL 作为现金的替代品。AAPL 的评论褒贬不一，一些人认为其最好的日子还在后头，而另一些人则认为辉煌的日子将无法重现。我认为市场正在给投资者一个机会，因为苹果公司应该会在 2021 年下半年摆脱横盘整理模式。</blockquote></p><p> The market wasn't impressed by the blowout AAPL delivered in Q1 and Q2. Instead of an upside climb supported by fundamentals, shares of AAPL have been treading water. As an AAPL bull, it's perplexing that so much attention is placed on meme stocks instead of companies such as AAPL when it's setting the stage for their best year ever. After reading the comments of the recent articles on MEME stocks, I have written, then looking back at the comment sections of some AAPL articles, I just don't understand how the mindset is shifting to outright speculation &amp; gambling rather than investing. In the first 2 quarters of the fiscal year, 2021 AAPL has generated $3.08 in EPS while the entire 2020 fiscal year delivered $3.31 in EPS. AAPL is solidifying the foundation for its best year ever in many metrics, yet the market isn't impressed. I believe there will be impressive fireworks in the 2ndhalf of 2021, and patient shareholders will be rewarded as Q3 and Q4 numbers are reported.</p><p><blockquote>市场对 AAPL 在第一季度和第二季度的井喷并没有留下深刻印象。AAPL 股价并没有在基本面支撑下上涨，而是一直在下跌。作为一名 AAPL 多头，令人困惑的是，当 AAPL 等公司正在为其有史以来最好的一年奠定基础时，如此多的注意力却集中在模因股票上，而不是像 AAPL 这样的公司上。在阅读了最近关于模因股票的文章的评论后，我写道，然后回顾一些AAPL文章的评论部分，我只是不明白心态是如何转向彻底的投机和赌博而不是投资的。在本财年的前两个季度，AAPL 的每股收益为 3.08 美元，而整个 2020 财年的每股收益为 3.31 美元。AAPL 在许多指标上都在巩固其有史以来最好的一年的基础，但市场并没有留下深刻印象。我相信2021年下半年将会有令人印象深刻的烟火，随着第三季度和第四季度数据的公布，耐心的股东将会得到回报。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e86cb02096dfa9c6da05e350f274aa64\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"556\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple believes it's the best investment in the market and puts their money where their mouth is</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果相信这是市场上最好的投资，并说到做到</b></blockquote></p><p> So what does AAPL do with all of the cash it generates? For starters, they spend tens of billions annually building out their businesses while investing in research and development [R&amp;D]. In&nbsp;2020, AAPL spent $169.56 billion on their cost of generating revenue. The fruits of their labor can be seen in their product offerings and how quickly their newest business segments, including services and wearables, Home, and accessories, have grown. AAPL allocated $18.75 billion in 2020 to R&amp;D, generating advancements to their beloved products. One of the reasons AAPL has a cliental that could resemble a cult-like mentality is because AAPL doesn't stop innovating. They are always at the forefront pushing the boundaries of how technology can enhance an individual's daily life.</p><p><blockquote>那么，AAPL如何处理它产生的所有现金呢？首先，他们每年花费数百亿美元来发展业务，同时投资于研发[R&amp;D]。2020年，AAPL在创收成本上花费了1695.6亿美元。他们的劳动成果可以从他们的产品以及他们最新的业务部门（包括服务和可穿戴设备、家居和配件）的增长速度中看出。AAPL在2020年拨款187.5亿美元用于研发，为他们心爱的产品带来了进步。AAPL拥有类似于邪教心态的客户群的原因之一是因为AAPL没有停止创新。他们总是站在技术如何改善个人日常生活的最前沿。</blockquote></p><p> So what about the remaining cash after AAPL's business expenses are fulfilled? AAPL bets on themselves and views their stock as an investment. Since the fiscal year 2012, AAPL has repurchased $421.7 billion in its own stock. In 2021 AAPL has repurchased $43 billion in stock, indicating that senior leadership believes there is tremendous value in owning shares of AAPL. I remember the days where everyone got excited when insiders purchased shares of their company. For AAPL buying back stock is just an ordinary Monday. AAPL has repurchased more in stock over the past decade than most companies will ever see their market caps grow to. AAPL's&nbsp;board&nbsp;authorized an additional $90 billion to its existing share repurchase plan, and AAPL returned almost&nbsp;$23 billion&nbsp;in capital to shareholders in Q2 2021, it doesn't get more bullish than that.</p><p><blockquote>那么AAPL的业务费用兑现后剩余的现金怎么办呢？AAPL 押注于自己，并将其股票视为一项投资。自2012财年以来，AAPL已回购了4217亿美元的自有股票。2021年，AAPL回购了430亿美元的股票，表明高层领导认为拥有AAPL股票具有巨大的价值。我记得当内部人士购买他们公司股票时，每个人都很兴奋的日子。对于 AAPL 来说，回购股票只是一个普通的星期一。过去十年，苹果公司回购的股票数量超过了大多数公司的市值增长。AAPL 董事会授权向其现有股票回购计划追加 900 亿美元，AAPL 在 2021 年第二季度向股东返还了近 230 亿美元的资本，没有比这更乐观的了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3dbaf61374104ed17e51201af591ab7d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"349\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Meme stocks vs. Apple and the insanity of this market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>模因股票与苹果以及这个市场的疯狂</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> GameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) have decimated AAPL in share price appreciation throughout the first half of 2021. Regardless of why GME and AMC are up, the fact of the matter is GME has generated a return that exceeds 1,100%, and AMC has returned over 2,000%. Anyone who has ridden GME or AMC up, I congratulate and tip my hat to you. The market is being fueled by delusions of grandeur as AAPL is negative for the year, yet GME &amp; AMC have absolutely exploded to the upside.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站 (GME) 和AMC院线控股公司 (AMC) 在 2021 年上半年的股价升值幅度大幅削弱了 AAPL。不管GME和AMC为什么上涨，事实是GME的回报率超过了1,100%，AMC的回报率超过了2,000%。任何骑过 GME 或 AMC 的人，我都向你们表示祝贺并脱帽致敬。由于 AAPL 今年表现不佳，市场受到了宏伟错觉的推动，而 GME 和 AMC 却绝对上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c85258331453c02381346f8b6c676cec\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"499\"><span>(Source: Seeking Alpha)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Seeking Alpha）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> What's changed for AMC in the past several months? I can tell you, not a single thing. AMC is still a company that is in the red and barely makes money. I get it investing in companies like AMC can generate huge returns due to volatility, and I am not knocking it. If you can make money on it, by all means, don't let anyone stand in your way but be careful. When you read through&nbsp;AMC's income statement, they have never exceeded $400 million in net income. In the past decade, AMC's most profitable year was 2013, as their net income was $364.4 million. In 2019 which had zero ramifications from COVID, AMC generated $5.47 billion in revenue and couldn't even turn a profit as they lost -$149.1 million. AMC's last quarterly report had -$2.3 billion in equity on its balance sheet. The reality is AMC can issue additional shares and sell them to raise capital. This would benefit AMC by improving its balance sheet and increase its cash on hand. It seems like people don't understand that when a company issues more shares, the initial batch becomes diluted and is worthless because of the additional supply. AMC can issue shares and strengthen its balance sheet, but it won't solve its profit problems. AAPL pays more in dividends to its shareholders every quarter than the profit AMC has generated in the past decade, yet AMC is the stock generating larger returns.</p><p><blockquote>过去几个月AMC发生了什么变化？我可以告诉你，一件事都没有。AMC仍然是一家亏损的公司，几乎不赚钱。我明白投资像 AMC 这样的公司可以由于波动性而产生巨大回报，我并没有否认这一点。如果你能在上面赚钱，无论如何，不要让任何人挡你的路，但要小心。当你通读AMC的损益表时，他们的净利润从未超过4亿美元。在过去十年中，AMC最赚钱的一年是2013年，净利润为3.644亿美元。2019 年，由于 COVID 的影响为零，AMC 创造了 54.7 亿美元的收入，但甚至无法盈利，因为他们亏损了 1.491 亿美元。AMC 上一季度报告显示其资产负债表上的股本为 -23 亿美元。现实情况是，AMC 可以发行额外股票并出售以筹集资金。这将使 AMC 受益，改善其资产负债表并增加手头现金。人们似乎不明白，当一家公司发行更多股票时，最初的一批股票会因为额外的供应量而被稀释，变得一文不值。AMC可以发行股票并加强其资产负债表，但这并不能解决其利润问题。AAPL 每个季度向股东支付的股息比 AMC 过去十年产生的利润还要多，但 AMC 是产生更大回报的股票。</blockquote></p><p> When investors purchase shares of AMC, they are buying a company with negative EPS. AMC's P/E ratio isn't measurable on a trailing twelve-month or a forward basis, yet investors are willing to pay for nonexistent earnings. In the comments of my&nbsp;AMC article, people said fundamentals don't matter. I understand that AMC has been a technical trade, but that doesn't change the reality that investors are paying for a company with negative earnings.Currently, the average PE Ratio for the S&amp;P is 45.02. If I use the EPS AAPL generated in the first 6 months of the fiscal year 2021 of $3.08, their PE Ratio would be 40.55. For the TTM, AAPL has generated $4.49 in EPS, which brings their PE Ratio down to 28.09. Currently, investors are paying $28.09 for every $1 in earnings AAPL generates, which is low for the tech industry.Amazon (AMZN)&nbsp;has a PE of 62.44,Microsoft (MSFT)34.93, and&nbsp;Google (GOOGL)of 32.05. Call me old-fashioned, but I like to invest in companies that turn a profit.</p><p><blockquote>当投资者购买 AMC 股票时，他们购买的是一家每股收益为负的公司。AMC 的市盈率无法在过去 12 个月或远期基础上衡量，但投资者愿意为不存在的收益买单。在我的AMC文章的评论中，人们说基本面并不重要。我知道 AMC 一直是一项技术性交易，但这并不能改变投资者为负收益公司买单的现实。目前，标准普尔的平均市盈率为45.02。如果我使用 AAPL 在 2021 财年前 6 个月产生的每股收益 3.08 美元，他们的市盈率将为 40.55。对于 TTM，AAPL 的每股收益为 4.49 美元，这使得他们的市盈率降至 28.09。目前，投资者为 AAPL 每产生 1 美元的收益支付 28.09 美元，这对于科技行业来说是较低的。亚马逊 (AMZN) 的市盈率为 62.44，微软 (MSFT) 为 34.93，谷歌 (GOOGL) 为 32.05。看涨期权我很守旧，但我喜欢投资盈利的公司。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79e06d9bc68454731c984429111ff056\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"661\"><span>(Source:multpl.com)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：multpl.com）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Laying out the bull case for Apple and why a breakout to the upside is inevitable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>阐述苹果的牛市理由以及为什么突破上行是不可避免的</b></blockquote></p><p> AAPL has a cult-like following that gravitates to its products and services. For the first 6 months of 2021,AAPLhas generated $201.02 billion in revenue, $82.41 billion in gross profit, and $52.39 billion in net income. In 2021 AAPL has already generated 73.23% ($201.02 billion) of 2020's total revenue, then 78.51% of 2020's gross income ($82.41 billion) and 91.25% of 2020's total net income ($52.39 billion). AAPL is on track to decimate its previous records, and unless something unfathomable occurs, 2021 will be AAPL's best year ever.</p><p><blockquote>AAPL 拥有一批狂热的追随者，他们被其产品和服务所吸引。2021年前6个月，AAPLhas实现收入2010.2亿美元，毛利润824.1亿美元，净利润523.9亿美元。2021年，AAPL已经创造了2020年总收入的73.23%（2010.2亿美元），然后是2020年总收入的78.51%（824.1亿美元）和2020年总净收入的91.25%（523.9亿美元）。AAPL 有望打破其之前的记录，除非发生深不可测的事情，否则 2021 年将是 AAPL 有史以来最好的一年。</blockquote></p><p> So the real questions are what's causing the surge in AAPL's financials, and are they sustainable? Part of the reason is AAPL has seen an increase in its hardware sales from iPhone 12's down to iPads. An argument can be made that many people needed to upgrade their technology during the pandemic due to working from home or remote learning, but that logic can't be used for 2021. At the end of April, when&nbsp;AAPL reported Q2,their iPhone sales exceeded expectations by $7.14 billion, Mac sales by $2.2 billion, and iPad sales by $2.01 billion. These numbers were a year later, and while the iPhone 12, which was AAPL's first 5G release, was expected to create tailwinds, I believe the pandemic pushed society into a place where a greater emphasis is placed on technology.</p><p><blockquote>因此，真正的问题是，是什么导致了 AAPL 财务状况的飙升，以及它们是否可持续？部分原因是苹果公司的硬件销量从 iPhone 12 到 iPad 都有所增长。可以说，由于在家工作或远程学习，许多人在疫情期间需要升级他们的技术，但这种逻辑不能用于2021年。4月底，苹果公司公布第二季度业绩时，其iPhone销售额超出预期71.4亿美元，Mac销售额超出预期22亿美元，iPad销售额超出预期20.1亿美元。这些数字是在一年后公布的，虽然苹果公司发布的第一款 5G 手机 iPhone 12 预计会带来顺风，但我相信疫情将社会推向了一个更加重视技术的地方。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I believe AAPL will continue to see strong hardware sales, but that's only one piece of the puzzle. Services and Wearables Home and Accessories are becoming huge components of AAPL's financial metrics. In&nbsp;2018 Services&nbsp;generated $39.75 billion in revenue. In 2019 Services increased by $6.54 billion (16.46%) as they finished the year with $46.29 billion in revenue. In 2020 Services grew by $7.48 billion (16.15%) as its revenue totaled $53.77 billion. In the first 6 months of 2020, Services has already generated $32.66 billion in revenue, which is 60.75% of 2020's total revenue. Services continue to grow creating a true business segment of reoccurring revenue for AAPL. The beauty of Services is with each piece of hardware AAPL sells; there is an opportunity to generate additional revenue through Services every month.</p><p><blockquote>我相信 AAPL 将继续看到强劲的硬件销售，但这只是难题的一部分。服务、可穿戴设备、家居和配件正在成为 AAPL 财务指标的重要组成部分。2018年，服务业创造了397.5亿美元的收入。2019年，服务业增长了65.4亿美元（16.46%），年收入为462.9亿美元。2020年，服务业增长了74.8亿美元（16.15%），收入总计537.7亿美元。2020年前6个月，服务业已经创造了326.6亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的60.75%。服务持续增长，为 AAPL 创造了一个真正的经常性收入业务部门。服务之美在于AAPL销售的每一件硬件；每个月都有机会通过服务产生额外收入。</blockquote></p><p> Services are becoming a home run for AAPL as it diversifies its revenue mix away from being solely constructed from physical products. At the close of the fiscal year 2020, Services had increased its annual revenue by $29.42 billion (120.83%) in just 4 years. In the first 6 months of 2021, Services has generated $32.66 billion, which is 60% of 2020's annual revenue. AAPL is on track to crack $60 billion in revenue from Services in the fiscal year 2021. Looking further out, Services could be a $100 billion revenue generator in the not-too-distant future.</p><p><blockquote>随着 AAPL 实现收入结构多元化，不再仅仅依赖实体产品，服务正在成为 AAPL 的本垒打。截至 2020 财年末，Services 在短短 4 年内年收入增加了 294.2 亿美元（120.83%）。2021年前6个月，服务业创造了326.6亿美元，占2020年年收入的60%。AAPL 有望在 2021 财年实现 600 亿美元的服务收入。展望未来，在不久的将来，服务业可能会产生 1000 亿美元的收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f044f79f7525038fb94ed27b6a92209\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Wearables Home and Accessories continues to follow in Service's footsteps as it has become a larger revenue segment than iPad and Mac. With the inception of the Apple Watch, this category has grown from generating $11.13 billion in 2016 to $30.62 billion in 2020. Over 4 fiscal years, Wearables Home and Accessories has increased its revenue by $24.48 billion (175.06%), and its growth keeps expanding. In the first 6 months of 2021, Wearables Home and Accessories have generated $20.81 billion in revenue, which is 67.95% of 2020's total revenue. AAPL is certainly on track to generate $35 billion-plus in revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories in the fiscal year 2021. Over the next several years, AAPL is on track to generate $50 billion in annual revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories.</p><p><blockquote>家庭可穿戴设备和配件继续追随 Service 的脚步，因为它已成为比 iPad 和 Mac 更大的收入领域。随着苹果观察的推出，这一类别已经从2016年的111.3亿美元增长到2020年的306.2亿美元。在4个财年中，可穿戴家居和配件的收入增加了244.8亿美元（175.06%），并且增长不断扩大。2021年前6个月，家用可穿戴设备和配件创造了208.1亿美元的收入，占2020年总收入的67.95%。AAPL 肯定有望在 2021 财年从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生超过 350 亿美元的收入。未来几年，AAPL 有望从家用可穿戴设备和配件中产生 500 亿美元的年收入。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7071ec652302c6cab585fef4c408d65\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\"><span>(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：Steven Fiorillo）（数据来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> By the end of the Fiscal Year 2025, there is a good chance that Services can generate more than $78 billion, and Wearables Home and Accessories could generate over $44 billion in annual revenue if they both grow at a 10% rate. These two categories are on pace to exceed $100 billion in revenue combined, which could grow into $150 billion annually in the late 2020s. I am shocked investors haven't been piling into AAPL, and it's even more ludicrous that an emphasis on AAPL's numbers isn't being discussed in greater detail. What's AAPL worth down the road when Services reaches $100 billion in revenue and Wearables Home and Accessories reaches $50 billion? Over the past decade, AAPL has continued to innovate and change how technology is used, and to think their best days are behind them is a notion I refuse to believe.</p><p><blockquote>到 2025 财年末，服务很有可能产生超过 780 亿美元的收入，如果家用可穿戴设备和配件都以 10% 的速度增长，则年收入可能超过 440 亿美元。这两个类别的总收入有望超过 1000 亿美元，到 2020 年代末，每年可能会增长到 1500 亿美元。我感到震惊的是，投资者没有大量涌入 AAPL，更可笑的是，对 AAPL 数据的强调没有得到更详细的讨论。当服务收入达到 1000 亿美元，家用可穿戴设备和配件收入达到 500 亿美元时，AAPL 的未来价值是多少？在过去的十年里，AAPL不断创新和改变技术的使用方式，我拒绝相信他们最好的日子已经过去。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62cd231b75d9f875329f6713debe846b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"191\"><span>(Source: Apple)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（资料来源：苹果）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Conclusion</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结论</b></blockquote></p><p> The meme stocks are causing a lot of excitement for some investors while they leave a whole other group shaking their heads. Other than a gamble, I can't understand why people want to invest in AMC when you could buy shares of AAPL on sale. AAPL should have exploded to the upside, but its 2 recent blowout quarters didn't move the needle. I believe it's going to be different once the Q3 numbers are reported. We're going to find out that once again, AAPL continues to buy shares by the billions while reporting that in 9 months, they have generated more net income than all of 2020. In the first 6 months of operations, AAPL has generated $201.02 billion in revenue and $52.39 billion in net income while giving back $53.2 billion in buybacks and dividends. Investors have been granted an opportunity to buy more AAPL before the next leg up. I am a shareholder of AAPL, and I plan on buying more before Q3 earnings.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票给一些投资者带来了极大的兴奋，而他们却让另一大群人摇头。除了赌博之外，我无法理解当你可以购买出售的 AAPL 股票时，为什么人们还要投资 AMC。苹果公司本应暴涨，但其最近两个季度的井喷并没有改变局面。我相信一旦第三季度数据公布，情况就会有所不同。我们将再次发现，AAPL 继续购买数十亿美元的股票，同时报告称，在 9 个月内，他们产生的净利润超过了 2020 年全年。在运营的前6个月，AAPL创造了2010.2亿美元的收入和523.9亿美元的净利润，同时返还了532亿美元的回购和股息。投资者有机会在下一次上涨之前购买更多 AAPL。我是 AAPL 的股东，我计划在第三季度财报公布之前购买更多股票。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4434600-apple-meme-stocks-or-apple-i-choose-apple-every-time\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4434600-apple-meme-stocks-or-apple-i-choose-apple-every-time","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167720481","content_text":"Summary\n\nApple has been a negative investment in 2021 while Meme stocks have exploded which is ridiculous.\nInvestors have been granted an opportunity to purchase Apple before its next leg up while the attention has shifted to chasing the quick buck with Meme stocks.\nApple is on pace to generate more than $300 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2021 and $75 billion in net income.\nEventually Apple will be invested back to the party and their numbers will be celebrated.\n\nNikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nIn 2021, Apple (AAPL) has become a negative returning investment underperforming the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (SPY) by a margin greater than 15%. In May of 2021, one of the hottest fund managers Cathie Wood of Ark Invest, sold nearly 300,000 shares of AAPL from the ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). It was reported that ARK, at one point, was reducing their stake in AAPL to add to their positions in Coinbase (COIN) and DraftKings (DKNG). Actively managed funds such as the one's ARK oversees buy and sell equities daily and could have been using AAPL as an alternative to cash. AAPL has a mixed bag of reviews as some believe its best days are ahead of it while others believe the glory days won't be reclaimed. I think the market is granting investors an opportunity as AAPL should breakout from its sideways pattern in the 2ndhalf of 2021.\nThe market wasn't impressed by the blowout AAPL delivered in Q1 and Q2. Instead of an upside climb supported by fundamentals, shares of AAPL have been treading water. As an AAPL bull, it's perplexing that so much attention is placed on meme stocks instead of companies such as AAPL when it's setting the stage for their best year ever. After reading the comments of the recent articles on MEME stocks, I have written, then looking back at the comment sections of some AAPL articles, I just don't understand how the mindset is shifting to outright speculation & gambling rather than investing. In the first 2 quarters of the fiscal year, 2021 AAPL has generated $3.08 in EPS while the entire 2020 fiscal year delivered $3.31 in EPS. AAPL is solidifying the foundation for its best year ever in many metrics, yet the market isn't impressed. I believe there will be impressive fireworks in the 2ndhalf of 2021, and patient shareholders will be rewarded as Q3 and Q4 numbers are reported.\n(Source: Seeking Alpha)\nApple believes it's the best investment in the market and puts their money where their mouth is\nSo what does AAPL do with all of the cash it generates? For starters, they spend tens of billions annually building out their businesses while investing in research and development [R&D]. In 2020, AAPL spent $169.56 billion on their cost of generating revenue. The fruits of their labor can be seen in their product offerings and how quickly their newest business segments, including services and wearables, Home, and accessories, have grown. AAPL allocated $18.75 billion in 2020 to R&D, generating advancements to their beloved products. One of the reasons AAPL has a cliental that could resemble a cult-like mentality is because AAPL doesn't stop innovating. They are always at the forefront pushing the boundaries of how technology can enhance an individual's daily life.\nSo what about the remaining cash after AAPL's business expenses are fulfilled? AAPL bets on themselves and views their stock as an investment. Since the fiscal year 2012, AAPL has repurchased $421.7 billion in its own stock. In 2021 AAPL has repurchased $43 billion in stock, indicating that senior leadership believes there is tremendous value in owning shares of AAPL. I remember the days where everyone got excited when insiders purchased shares of their company. For AAPL buying back stock is just an ordinary Monday. AAPL has repurchased more in stock over the past decade than most companies will ever see their market caps grow to. AAPL's board authorized an additional $90 billion to its existing share repurchase plan, and AAPL returned almost $23 billion in capital to shareholders in Q2 2021, it doesn't get more bullish than that.\n(Source: Apple)\nMeme stocks vs. Apple and the insanity of this market\nGameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) have decimated AAPL in share price appreciation throughout the first half of 2021. Regardless of why GME and AMC are up, the fact of the matter is GME has generated a return that exceeds 1,100%, and AMC has returned over 2,000%. Anyone who has ridden GME or AMC up, I congratulate and tip my hat to you. The market is being fueled by delusions of grandeur as AAPL is negative for the year, yet GME & AMC have absolutely exploded to the upside.\n(Source: Seeking Alpha)\nWhat's changed for AMC in the past several months? I can tell you, not a single thing. AMC is still a company that is in the red and barely makes money. I get it investing in companies like AMC can generate huge returns due to volatility, and I am not knocking it. If you can make money on it, by all means, don't let anyone stand in your way but be careful. When you read through AMC's income statement, they have never exceeded $400 million in net income. In the past decade, AMC's most profitable year was 2013, as their net income was $364.4 million. In 2019 which had zero ramifications from COVID, AMC generated $5.47 billion in revenue and couldn't even turn a profit as they lost -$149.1 million. AMC's last quarterly report had -$2.3 billion in equity on its balance sheet. The reality is AMC can issue additional shares and sell them to raise capital. This would benefit AMC by improving its balance sheet and increase its cash on hand. It seems like people don't understand that when a company issues more shares, the initial batch becomes diluted and is worthless because of the additional supply. AMC can issue shares and strengthen its balance sheet, but it won't solve its profit problems. AAPL pays more in dividends to its shareholders every quarter than the profit AMC has generated in the past decade, yet AMC is the stock generating larger returns.\nWhen investors purchase shares of AMC, they are buying a company with negative EPS. AMC's P/E ratio isn't measurable on a trailing twelve-month or a forward basis, yet investors are willing to pay for nonexistent earnings. In the comments of my AMC article, people said fundamentals don't matter. I understand that AMC has been a technical trade, but that doesn't change the reality that investors are paying for a company with negative earnings.Currently, the average PE Ratio for the S&P is 45.02. If I use the EPS AAPL generated in the first 6 months of the fiscal year 2021 of $3.08, their PE Ratio would be 40.55. For the TTM, AAPL has generated $4.49 in EPS, which brings their PE Ratio down to 28.09. Currently, investors are paying $28.09 for every $1 in earnings AAPL generates, which is low for the tech industry.Amazon (AMZN) has a PE of 62.44,Microsoft (MSFT)34.93, and Google (GOOGL)of 32.05. Call me old-fashioned, but I like to invest in companies that turn a profit.\n(Source:multpl.com)\nLaying out the bull case for Apple and why a breakout to the upside is inevitable\nAAPL has a cult-like following that gravitates to its products and services. For the first 6 months of 2021,AAPLhas generated $201.02 billion in revenue, $82.41 billion in gross profit, and $52.39 billion in net income. In 2021 AAPL has already generated 73.23% ($201.02 billion) of 2020's total revenue, then 78.51% of 2020's gross income ($82.41 billion) and 91.25% of 2020's total net income ($52.39 billion). AAPL is on track to decimate its previous records, and unless something unfathomable occurs, 2021 will be AAPL's best year ever.\nSo the real questions are what's causing the surge in AAPL's financials, and are they sustainable? Part of the reason is AAPL has seen an increase in its hardware sales from iPhone 12's down to iPads. An argument can be made that many people needed to upgrade their technology during the pandemic due to working from home or remote learning, but that logic can't be used for 2021. At the end of April, when AAPL reported Q2,their iPhone sales exceeded expectations by $7.14 billion, Mac sales by $2.2 billion, and iPad sales by $2.01 billion. These numbers were a year later, and while the iPhone 12, which was AAPL's first 5G release, was expected to create tailwinds, I believe the pandemic pushed society into a place where a greater emphasis is placed on technology.\nI believe AAPL will continue to see strong hardware sales, but that's only one piece of the puzzle. Services and Wearables Home and Accessories are becoming huge components of AAPL's financial metrics. In 2018 Services generated $39.75 billion in revenue. In 2019 Services increased by $6.54 billion (16.46%) as they finished the year with $46.29 billion in revenue. In 2020 Services grew by $7.48 billion (16.15%) as its revenue totaled $53.77 billion. In the first 6 months of 2020, Services has already generated $32.66 billion in revenue, which is 60.75% of 2020's total revenue. Services continue to grow creating a true business segment of reoccurring revenue for AAPL. The beauty of Services is with each piece of hardware AAPL sells; there is an opportunity to generate additional revenue through Services every month.\nServices are becoming a home run for AAPL as it diversifies its revenue mix away from being solely constructed from physical products. At the close of the fiscal year 2020, Services had increased its annual revenue by $29.42 billion (120.83%) in just 4 years. In the first 6 months of 2021, Services has generated $32.66 billion, which is 60% of 2020's annual revenue. AAPL is on track to crack $60 billion in revenue from Services in the fiscal year 2021. Looking further out, Services could be a $100 billion revenue generator in the not-too-distant future.\n(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)\nWearables Home and Accessories continues to follow in Service's footsteps as it has become a larger revenue segment than iPad and Mac. With the inception of the Apple Watch, this category has grown from generating $11.13 billion in 2016 to $30.62 billion in 2020. Over 4 fiscal years, Wearables Home and Accessories has increased its revenue by $24.48 billion (175.06%), and its growth keeps expanding. In the first 6 months of 2021, Wearables Home and Accessories have generated $20.81 billion in revenue, which is 67.95% of 2020's total revenue. AAPL is certainly on track to generate $35 billion-plus in revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories in the fiscal year 2021. Over the next several years, AAPL is on track to generate $50 billion in annual revenue from Wearables Home and Accessories.\n(Source: Steven Fiorillo) (Data Source: Apple)\nBy the end of the Fiscal Year 2025, there is a good chance that Services can generate more than $78 billion, and Wearables Home and Accessories could generate over $44 billion in annual revenue if they both grow at a 10% rate. These two categories are on pace to exceed $100 billion in revenue combined, which could grow into $150 billion annually in the late 2020s. I am shocked investors haven't been piling into AAPL, and it's even more ludicrous that an emphasis on AAPL's numbers isn't being discussed in greater detail. What's AAPL worth down the road when Services reaches $100 billion in revenue and Wearables Home and Accessories reaches $50 billion? Over the past decade, AAPL has continued to innovate and change how technology is used, and to think their best days are behind them is a notion I refuse to believe.\n(Source: Apple)\nConclusion\nThe meme stocks are causing a lot of excitement for some investors while they leave a whole other group shaking their heads. Other than a gamble, I can't understand why people want to invest in AMC when you could buy shares of AAPL on sale. AAPL should have exploded to the upside, but its 2 recent blowout quarters didn't move the needle. I believe it's going to be different once the Q3 numbers are reported. We're going to find out that once again, AAPL continues to buy shares by the billions while reporting that in 9 months, they have generated more net income than all of 2020. In the first 6 months of operations, AAPL has generated $201.02 billion in revenue and $52.39 billion in net income while giving back $53.2 billion in buybacks and dividends. Investors have been granted an opportunity to buy more AAPL before the next leg up. I am a shareholder of AAPL, and I plan on buying more before Q3 earnings.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1964,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187866308,"gmtCreate":1623749520604,"gmtModify":1634029122788,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice man","listText":"Nice man","text":"Nice man","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187866308","repostId":"1102470114","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2152,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187889885,"gmtCreate":1623749197847,"gmtModify":1634029133503,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice piece of news!","listText":"Nice piece of news!","text":"Nice piece of news!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187889885","repostId":"1119457448","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2129,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325463826,"gmtCreate":1615914784765,"gmtModify":1703495046565,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Oof","listText":"Oof","text":"Oof","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325463826","repostId":"1115937529","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2527,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325636335,"gmtCreate":1615892759427,"gmtModify":1703494575364,"author":{"id":"3577487093536782","authorId":"3577487093536782","name":"Jensenchow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1836439dc7ae18c2b5f57bb1a4a596b3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577487093536782","authorIdStr":"3577487093536782"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325636335","repostId":"1130270839","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130270839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615887302,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1130270839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-16 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The U.S. Is Trying to Fix the Chip Shortage. What It Could Mean for Semiconductor Stocks<blockquote>美国正试图解决芯片短缺问题。这对半导体股票意味着什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130270839","media":"Barrons","summary":"As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur","content":"<p>As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, a J.P. Morgan analyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.</p><p><blockquote>随着美国政府越来越接近为一系列旨在刺激国内半导体制造和研究的激励措施和补贴提供资金，摩根大通分析师已经弄清楚哪些股票可能从中受益最大。</blockquote></p><p>Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as natural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed&nbsp;to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.</p><p><blockquote>全球芯片短缺的部分原因是 Covid-19 大流行以及自然灾害导致的供需波动，国会今年早些时候批准了一系列针对美国芯片公司的计划和激励措施。立法者们将旨在支持美国制造业、研发的计划纳入了 2021 财年国防授权法案，该法案于 1 月份成为法律，但并未为这些举措提供资金。</blockquote></p><p>According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通芯片分析师哈兰-苏尔（Harlan Sur）认为，这些项目的资金很可能会被纳入乔-拜登总统的基础设施法案，这是政府的下一个优先事项之一。苏尔预计 “重建得更好 ”基础设施计划将于今年上半年获得通过，资金将于 2021 年下半年开始发放。</blockquote></p><p>Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔的团队估计，激励和补贴总额可能在 350 亿至 370 亿美元之间，其中约 180 亿至 200 亿美元用于国内芯片制造，150 亿至 170 亿美元用于芯片研发。</blockquote></p><p>Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.</p><p><blockquote>根据《国防授权法案》目前的措辞，苏尔在周一发表的一份说明中写道，他预计在发放资金和激励措施时，美国的集成设备制造商可能会被优先考虑。</blockquote></p><p>Those would include manufacturers such as Intel (ticker: INTC), Micron Technology (MU), Texas Instruments (TXN), Analog Devices (ADI), and On Semiconductor (ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔写道，其中包括英特尔（股票代码：INTC）、美光科技（MU）、德州仪器（TXN）、模拟器件（ADI）和安森美半导体（ON）等制造商都可能受益。他写道，拥有美国国防相关资质的公司也处于有利地位，可以从中受益。他表示，在美国运营的国际芯片制造商台积电 (TSM) 和恩智浦半导体 (NXPI) 也应该受益，但程度较小。</blockquote></p><p>Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.</p><p><blockquote>Applied Materials (AMAT) 和 Lam Research (LRCX) 等芯片制造设备制造公司也应该受到提振，因为激励措施导致设备采购增加。</blockquote></p><p>The PHLX Semiconductor index, or Sox, advanced nearly 2% on Monday, led by NXP Semiconductors NXP, which rose 8.8% to $199.57, and Broadcom (AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.66.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX 半导体指数 (Sox) 周一上涨近 2%，其中恩智浦半导体 NXP 上涨 8.8%，至 199.57 美元，博通 (AVGO) 上涨 4.3%，至 470.66 美元。</blockquote></p><p>The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as demand for chips destined for products ranging from appliances and videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.</p><p><blockquote>由于从家电、视频游戏机到汽车和智能手机等产品对芯片的需求已经超过了半导体行业的生产能力，Sox 在过去一年中上涨了 94%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The U.S. Is Trying to Fix the Chip Shortage. What It Could Mean for Semiconductor Stocks<blockquote>美国正试图解决芯片短缺问题。这对半导体股票意味着什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe U.S. Is Trying to Fix the Chip Shortage. What It Could Mean for Semiconductor Stocks<blockquote>美国正试图解决芯片短缺问题。这对半导体股票意味着什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-16 17:35</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, a J.P. Morgan analyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.</p><p><blockquote>随着美国政府越来越接近为一系列旨在刺激国内半导体制造和研究的激励措施和补贴提供资金，摩根大通分析师已经弄清楚哪些股票可能从中受益最大。</blockquote></p><p>Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as natural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed&nbsp;to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.</p><p><blockquote>全球芯片短缺的部分原因是 Covid-19 大流行以及自然灾害导致的供需波动，国会今年早些时候批准了一系列针对美国芯片公司的计划和激励措施。立法者们将旨在支持美国制造业、研发的计划纳入了 2021 财年国防授权法案，该法案于 1 月份成为法律，但并未为这些举措提供资金。</blockquote></p><p>According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通芯片分析师哈兰-苏尔（Harlan Sur）认为，这些项目的资金很可能会被纳入乔-拜登总统的基础设施法案，这是政府的下一个优先事项之一。苏尔预计 “重建得更好 ”基础设施计划将于今年上半年获得通过，资金将于 2021 年下半年开始发放。</blockquote></p><p>Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔的团队估计，激励和补贴总额可能在 350 亿至 370 亿美元之间，其中约 180 亿至 200 亿美元用于国内芯片制造，150 亿至 170 亿美元用于芯片研发。</blockquote></p><p>Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.</p><p><blockquote>根据《国防授权法案》目前的措辞，苏尔在周一发表的一份说明中写道，他预计在发放资金和激励措施时，美国的集成设备制造商可能会被优先考虑。</blockquote></p><p>Those would include manufacturers such as Intel (ticker: INTC), Micron Technology (MU), Texas Instruments (TXN), Analog Devices (ADI), and On Semiconductor (ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.</p><p><blockquote>苏尔写道，其中包括英特尔（股票代码：INTC）、美光科技（MU）、德州仪器（TXN）、模拟器件（ADI）和安森美半导体（ON）等制造商都可能受益。他写道，拥有美国国防相关资质的公司也处于有利地位，可以从中受益。他表示，在美国运营的国际芯片制造商台积电 (TSM) 和恩智浦半导体 (NXPI) 也应该受益，但程度较小。</blockquote></p><p>Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.</p><p><blockquote>Applied Materials (AMAT) 和 Lam Research (LRCX) 等芯片制造设备制造公司也应该受到提振，因为激励措施导致设备采购增加。</blockquote></p><p>The PHLX Semiconductor index, or Sox, advanced nearly 2% on Monday, led by NXP Semiconductors NXP, which rose 8.8% to $199.57, and Broadcom (AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.66.</p><p><blockquote>PHLX 半导体指数 (Sox) 周一上涨近 2%，其中恩智浦半导体 NXP 上涨 8.8%，至 199.57 美元，博通 (AVGO) 上涨 4.3%，至 470.66 美元。</blockquote></p><p>The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as demand for chips destined for products ranging from appliances and videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.</p><p><blockquote>由于从家电、视频游戏机到汽车和智能手机等产品对芯片的需求已经超过了半导体行业的生产能力，Sox 在过去一年中上涨了 94%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-u-s-is-trying-to-fix-the-chip-shortage-what-it-could-mean-for-semiconductor-stocks-51615838286?mod=hp_DAY_2\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-u-s-is-trying-to-fix-the-chip-shortage-what-it-could-mean-for-semiconductor-stocks-51615838286?mod=hp_DAY_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130270839","content_text":"As the U.S. government inches closer to funding a batch of incentives and subsidies designed to spur domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, a J.P. Morgan analyst has figured out which stocks could stand to gain the most from it.Amid global chip shortages, triggered in part by supply and demand fluctuations because of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as natural disasters, Congress authorized a series of programs and incentives for U.S.-based chip companies earlier this year. Lawmakers included the programs designed to bolster U.S. manufacturing, research, and development in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2021, which became law in January, but didn’t provide funding for those initiatives.According to J.P. Morgan chip analyst Harlan Sur, it’s likely that funding for those programs may be included in President Joe Biden ‘s infrastructure bill, one of the next priorities for the administration. Sur expects the “Build Back Better” infrastructure plan to pass in the first half of the year, resulting in funding starting in the second half of 2021.Sur’s team estimated the incentives and subsidies could total between $35 billion and $37 billion, with about $18 billion to $20 billion for domestic chip manufacturing and $15 billion to $17 billion for chip research and development.Based on the current language in the National Defense Authorize Act, Sur wrote in a note published on Monday that he expects integrated device manufacturers based in the U.S. will likely be prioritized when it’s time to dole out funds and incentives.Those would include manufacturers such as Intel (ticker: INTC), Micron Technology (MU), Texas Instruments (TXN), Analog Devices (ADI), and On Semiconductor (ON) are all likely to benefit, Sur wrote. Companies that have U.S. defense-related qualifications are well-positioned to benefit as well, he wrote. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), international-based chip manufacturers that operate in the U.S., should benefit too, he said, but to a lesser degree.Companies that make chip manufacturing equipment such as Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) should also receive a lift because of higher equipment purchasing resulting from the incentives.The PHLX Semiconductor index, or Sox, advanced nearly 2% on Monday, led by NXP Semiconductors NXP, which rose 8.8% to $199.57, and Broadcom (AVGO), which jumped 4.3% to $470.66.The Sox has gained 94% in the past year as demand for chips destined for products ranging from appliances and videogame consoles to vehicles and smartphones has outpaced the industry’s ability to produce semiconductors.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2121,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}