Loola的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Loola

Loola

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

330关注

6粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-05-26

like and comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-14

comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-08

$Luokung Technology Corp(LKCO)$what’s behind the rise?

2021-06-11

comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-26

.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-29

like comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-09-14

ok

EV stocks rose in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>

2021-05-28

like and comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-29

comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-12

like and comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577872621107081","uuid":"3577872621107081","gmtCreate":1614778597403,"gmtModify":1624976941548,"name":"Loola","pinyin":"loola","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":6,"headSize":330,"tweetSize":72,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.06%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.19","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.19%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":886777088,"gmtCreate":1631628602144,"gmtModify":1631892902949,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/886777088","repostId":"1155175288","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1155175288","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1631627144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1155175288?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-14 21:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV stocks rose in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155175288","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto climbed between 0.7% and 2%.Whi","content":"<p>EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto&nbsp;climbed between 0.7% and 2%.While&nbsp;Lucid Group fell nearly 4%&nbsp;as&nbsp;an equity research analyst at Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of the company at underweight.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨。特斯拉、蔚来、小鹏汽车和理想汽车上涨0.7%至2%。而Lucid Group则下跌近4%，摩根士丹利股票研究分析师在跑输大盘开始对该公司进行报道。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df9a72b93885e07dad67e2dc86b0156a\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"483\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV stocks rose in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV stocks rose in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-09-14 21:45</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto&nbsp;climbed between 0.7% and 2%.While&nbsp;Lucid Group fell nearly 4%&nbsp;as&nbsp;an equity research analyst at Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of the company at underweight.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨。特斯拉、蔚来、小鹏汽车和理想汽车上涨0.7%至2%。而Lucid Group则下跌近4%，摩根士丹利股票研究分析师在跑输大盘开始对该公司进行报道。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df9a72b93885e07dad67e2dc86b0156a\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"483\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1155175288","content_text":"EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto climbed between 0.7% and 2%.While Lucid Group fell nearly 4% as an equity research analyst at Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of the company at underweight.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9,"LI":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1858,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810514615,"gmtCreate":1629986424937,"gmtModify":1704954204057,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":".","listText":".","text":".","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/810514615","repostId":"1100464351","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1100464351","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629986331,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1100464351?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-26 21:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple could pass chip costs into higher iPhone 13 prices<blockquote>苹果可能会将芯片成本转嫁到iPhone 13价格上涨中</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100464351","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"$Apple$ could raise the prices for its upcoming iPhone 13 lineup as chip manufacturing partner $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing$ moves to raise its costs amid the ongoing global semiconductor shortage.DigiTimes, a publication with a strong record with news from industry sources, reports that TSMC could raise Apple's prices by 3% to 5%, costs that Apple might pass on to consumers.TSMC is reportedly raising overall prices from 10% to 20% but is offering a discount to its largest client. Apple a","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> (NASDAQ:AAPL)could raise the prices for its upcoming iPhone 13 lineup as chip manufacturing partner <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing</a> (NYSE:TSM)moves to raise its costs amid the ongoing global semiconductor shortage.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>（纳斯达克：AAPL）作为芯片制造合作伙伴，可能会提高即将推出的iPhone 13系列产品的价格<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">台积电</a>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TSM）在全球半导体持续短缺的情况下提高成本。</blockquote></p><p> <i>DigiTimes</i>, a publication with a strong record with news from industry sources,&nbsp;reports&nbsp;that TSMC could raise Apple's prices by 3% to 5%, costs that Apple might pass on to consumers.</p><p><blockquote><i>DigiTimes</i>该出版物拥有来自行业消息的良好记录，报道称台积电可能会将苹果的价格提高3%至5%，苹果可能会将成本转嫁给消费者。</blockquote></p><p> TSMC is reportedly raising overall prices from 10% to 20% but is offering a discount to its largest client. Apple accounts for over 20% of the foundry's total wafer revenue.</p><p><blockquote>据报道，台积电将整体价格从10%提高到20%，但向其最大客户提供折扣。苹果占该代工厂晶圆总收入的20%以上。</blockquote></p><p> The iPhone 12 lineup debuted last year with four core models, two base and two Pro edition handsets. The prices ranged from $799 for the standard iPhone 12 to $1,099 for the&nbsp;iPhone 12 Max with 128GB of storage.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone 12系列去年首次亮相，有四款核心机型、两款基础版和两款专业版手机。价格从标准iPhone 12的799美元到128GB存储空间的iPhone 12 Max的1099美元不等。</blockquote></p><p> Apple will unveil its newest family of handsets as early as next month and the prices will be announced at the launch event. Reports have suggested the so-called iPhone 13 lineup will include four models with the same sizes as the iPhone 12 family, faster A15 Bionic processors and larger batteries. The two Pro models are expected to feature an&nbsp;improved ultrawide camera lens.</p><p><blockquote>苹果最早将于下个月推出其最新的手机系列，价格将在发布会上公布。有报道称，所谓的iPhone 13系列将包括四款与iPhone 12系列尺寸相同的机型，更快的A15仿生处理器和更大的电池。这两款Pro机型预计将采用改进的超宽相机镜头。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple could pass chip costs into higher iPhone 13 prices<blockquote>苹果可能会将芯片成本转嫁到iPhone 13价格上涨中</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple could pass chip costs into higher iPhone 13 prices<blockquote>苹果可能会将芯片成本转嫁到iPhone 13价格上涨中</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-26 21:58</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> (NASDAQ:AAPL)could raise the prices for its upcoming iPhone 13 lineup as chip manufacturing partner <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing</a> (NYSE:TSM)moves to raise its costs amid the ongoing global semiconductor shortage.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>（纳斯达克：AAPL）作为芯片制造合作伙伴，可能会提高即将推出的iPhone 13系列产品的价格<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">台积电</a>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：TSM）在全球半导体持续短缺的情况下提高成本。</blockquote></p><p> <i>DigiTimes</i>, a publication with a strong record with news from industry sources,&nbsp;reports&nbsp;that TSMC could raise Apple's prices by 3% to 5%, costs that Apple might pass on to consumers.</p><p><blockquote><i>DigiTimes</i>该出版物拥有来自行业消息的良好记录，报道称台积电可能会将苹果的价格提高3%至5%，苹果可能会将成本转嫁给消费者。</blockquote></p><p> TSMC is reportedly raising overall prices from 10% to 20% but is offering a discount to its largest client. Apple accounts for over 20% of the foundry's total wafer revenue.</p><p><blockquote>据报道，台积电将整体价格从10%提高到20%，但向其最大客户提供折扣。苹果占该代工厂晶圆总收入的20%以上。</blockquote></p><p> The iPhone 12 lineup debuted last year with four core models, two base and two Pro edition handsets. The prices ranged from $799 for the standard iPhone 12 to $1,099 for the&nbsp;iPhone 12 Max with 128GB of storage.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone 12系列去年首次亮相，有四款核心机型、两款基础版和两款专业版手机。价格从标准iPhone 12的799美元到128GB存储空间的iPhone 12 Max的1099美元不等。</blockquote></p><p> Apple will unveil its newest family of handsets as early as next month and the prices will be announced at the launch event. Reports have suggested the so-called iPhone 13 lineup will include four models with the same sizes as the iPhone 12 family, faster A15 Bionic processors and larger batteries. The two Pro models are expected to feature an&nbsp;improved ultrawide camera lens.</p><p><blockquote>苹果最早将于下个月推出其最新的手机系列，价格将在发布会上公布。有报道称，所谓的iPhone 13系列将包括四款与iPhone 12系列尺寸相同的机型，更快的A15仿生处理器和更大的电池。这两款Pro机型预计将采用改进的超宽相机镜头。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3734458-apple-could-pass-chip-costs-into-higher-iphone-13-prices\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","TSM":"台积电"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3734458-apple-could-pass-chip-costs-into-higher-iphone-13-prices","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100464351","content_text":"Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)could raise the prices for its upcoming iPhone 13 lineup as chip manufacturing partner Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE:TSM)moves to raise its costs amid the ongoing global semiconductor shortage.\nDigiTimes, a publication with a strong record with news from industry sources, reports that TSMC could raise Apple's prices by 3% to 5%, costs that Apple might pass on to consumers.\nTSMC is reportedly raising overall prices from 10% to 20% but is offering a discount to its largest client. Apple accounts for over 20% of the foundry's total wafer revenue.\nThe iPhone 12 lineup debuted last year with four core models, two base and two Pro edition handsets. The prices ranged from $799 for the standard iPhone 12 to $1,099 for the iPhone 12 Max with 128GB of storage.\nApple will unveil its newest family of handsets as early as next month and the prices will be announced at the launch event. Reports have suggested the so-called iPhone 13 lineup will include four models with the same sizes as the iPhone 12 family, faster A15 Bionic processors and larger batteries. The two Pro models are expected to feature an improved ultrawide camera lens.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSM":0.9,"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2233,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810515598,"gmtCreate":1629986394914,"gmtModify":1704954203183,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/810515598","repostId":"2162313091","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1869,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":835284393,"gmtCreate":1629720905712,"gmtModify":1631892902959,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"hi","listText":"hi","text":"hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/835284393","repostId":"1122989058","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2351,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836322047,"gmtCreate":1629457838789,"gmtModify":1631892902962,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836322047","repostId":"1124578118","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124578118","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629452876,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124578118?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-20 17:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Stock Split: Will Another One Ever Happen?<blockquote>英特尔股票分割：还会发生另一次吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124578118","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nMany tech names have done stock splits in 2020 and 2021 that got a lot of attention.\nINTC h","content":"<p><h3><b>Summary</b></h3> <ul>  <li>Many tech names have done stock splits in 2020 and 2021 that got a lot of attention.</li>  <li>INTC has split its shares oftentimes in the past, but not in the last 20 years. We'll look at the reasons and what they mean for the future.</li>  <li>Intel has some issues, but on the other hand, shares are pretty inexpensive and offer an above-average yield. All in all, Intel does neither look especially strong nor especially bad.</li>  <li>I do much more than just articles at Cash Flow Kingdom: Members get access to model portfolios, regular updates, a chat room, and more.</li> </ul> <h3><b>Article Thesis</b></h3> Due to reader demand, we'll take a look at whether Intel Corporation (INTC) might conduct another stock split in the foreseeable future. Peers such as NVIDIA (NVDA) have done so in the recent past, thus the idea is not completely outlandish. At the same time, however, it should be noted that Intel's share price has been languishing in the recent past, and since shares are far from expensive, I believe that a stock split in the near term is unlikely.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>总结</b></h3><ul><li>许多科技公司在2020年和2021年进行了股票分割，引起了广泛关注。</li><li>INTC过去经常进行股票分割，但在过去20年里没有。我们将看看原因以及它们对未来的意义。</li><li>英特尔存在一些问题，但另一方面，股价相当便宜，收益率高于平均水平。总而言之，英特尔看起来既不是特别强大，也不是特别糟糕。</li><li>我在现金流王国做的不仅仅是文章：会员可以访问模型投资组合、定期更新、聊天室等等。</li></ul><h3><b>文章论文</b></h3>由于读者的需求，我们将看看英特尔公司（INTC）是否可能在可预见的未来进行另一次股票分割。英伟达（NVDA）等同行最近已经这样做了，因此这个想法并不完全奇怪。但与此同时，应该指出的是，英特尔的股价最近一直低迷，由于股价远非昂贵，我认为短期内不太可能进行股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>INTC Stock Price</b></h3> Intel Corporation is a leading semiconductor company in terms of revenue generation and output, but due to problems with new processes, and due to declining market share versus peers such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a> (AMD), its shares have vastly underperformed the broad semiconductor industry in recent years:</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>INTC股价</b></h3>就收入和产量而言，英特尔公司是一家领先的半导体公司，但由于新工艺的问题，以及与同行相比市场份额下降，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">英伟达公司</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>（AMD），其股价近年来的表现远远落后于整个半导体行业：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/43a79e5a532c48440cc2ab0a982ad3d4\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Data by&nbsp;YCharts</p><p><blockquote>数据来自YCharts</blockquote></p><p> With a 70% return over five years, Intel has been far from a bad investment, as this still pencils out to about 11% a year. But compared to its peers and the semiconductor industry as a whole (SOXX), Intel Corporation's returns look pretty bad, as others have seen their shares rise by 300%+ in the same time frame. With a market capitalization of $210 billion, Intel is cheaper than NVIDIA, despite the fact that Intel generates much higher revenue, earnings, and cash flow -- the market is valuing NVIDIA at a premium due to its better growth and more attractive product lineup. At current prices of around $53, Intel is trading ~20% below the consensus price target of $63, which indicates solid upside potential over the next year. Based on current earnings per share estimates for this year, Intel Corporation trades for 11x net profits, which is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the lowest valuations in the semiconductor industry, and which represents a clear discount compared to how the broad market is valued. At the same time, Intel also offers a dividend yield of 2.6% today -- which is roughly twice as much as the S&amp;P 500's (SPY) yield.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔五年内的回报率为70%，这远非一项糟糕的投资，因为每年的回报率仍高达11%左右。但与同行和整个半导体行业(SOXX)相比，英特尔公司的回报看起来相当糟糕，因为其他公司的股价在同一时间内上涨了300%以上。英特尔的市值为2100亿美元，但比英伟达便宜，尽管英特尔的收入、盈利和现金流要高得多——由于其更好的增长和更具吸引力的产品阵容，市场对英伟达的估值过高。以目前约53美元的价格计算，英特尔的交易价格比63美元的共识目标价低约20%，这表明明年具有强劲的上涨潜力。根据目前对今年每股收益的预测，英特尔公司的净利润为11倍，即<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>是半导体行业估值最低的，与大盘估值相比有明显的折扣。与此同时，英特尔今天还提供2.6%的股息收益率，大约是标普500（SPDR标普500指数ETF）收益率的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>Is Intel Stock Likely To Split Again</b></h3> In 2020 and 2021, stock splits have gotten a lot of attention, as huge companies such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> (AAPL) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> (TSLA) did them, while there was also&nbsp;speculation&nbsp;that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> (AMZN) could be interested in doing a stock split. Not too long ago, NVIDIA, one of Intel's main competitors,&nbsp;did a stock split as well.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>英特尔股票可能再次分割吗</b></h3>2020年和2021年，股票分割受到了很多关注，因为像<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>(AAPL)和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>（特斯拉）做到了，同时也有人猜测<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">亚马逊</a>（AMZN）可能有兴趣进行股票分割。不久前，英特尔的主要竞争对手之一英伟达也进行了股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> Some readers are interested in knowing whether Intel might do a stock split as well, which is why we can try to gauge the pros and cons of that. Let's first look at Intel's stock split history:</p><p><blockquote>一些读者有兴趣知道英特尔是否也可能进行股票分割，这就是为什么我们可以尝试衡量其利弊。我们先来看看英特尔的股票分割历史：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4744a6590d2621204996b265d995a823\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"727\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <i>Source:</i>&nbsp;<i>Intel Corporation</i></p><p><blockquote><i>资料来源：</i> <i>英特尔公司</i></blockquote></p><p> We see that the company has done stock splits repeatedly in the past, with a total of 13 stock splits recorded on the company's website. Clearly, the company has not been reluctant to split its shares in the past. At the same time, however, we can also note that the series of stock splits stopped in 2000, i.e. a little more than two decades ago. Not a single stock split was recorded since then, which means that the company has seemingly seen no good reason to split its stock since then. When Intel did its last stock split in 2000, its shares were trading at well above $100 and as high as $150 at some point. In other words, when Intel did its last stock split, its shares were trading with a relatively high nominal price, which was, of course, the result of the dot.com bubble during which Intel saw its shares explode upwards. Since then, shares have not regained their former strength, as they continue to trade below their highs from back then -- even following the 2-1 split that occurred in July 2000.</p><p><blockquote>我们看到该公司过去曾多次进行股票分割，公司网站上总共记录了13次股票分割。显然，该公司过去并不不愿意拆股。但与此同时，我们也可以注意到，一系列股票分割在2000年停止，也就是二十多年前。从那时起，没有进行过一次股票分割，这意味着该公司似乎没有看到从那时起分割股票的充分理由。当英特尔在2000年进行最后一次股票分割时，其股价远高于100美元，有时甚至高达150美元。换句话说，当英特尔上次进行股票分割时，其股票的名义价格相对较高，这当然是互联网泡沫的结果，在此期间英特尔股价爆炸式上涨。从那时起，股价就没有恢复到以前的强势，因为即使在2000年7月发生2-1的分割之后，它们的交易价格仍然低于当时的高点。</blockquote></p><p> When we look at other stock splits, we see a similar pattern:</p><p><blockquote>当我们观察其他股票分割时，我们会看到类似的模式：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccb1e1f3475ca38ef9dc7cbb0216124a\" tg-width=\"461\" tg-height=\"380\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Source:</i>&nbsp;<i>getsplithistory.com</i></p><p><blockquote><i>资料来源：</i> <i>getsplithistory.com</i></blockquote></p><p> Shares did trade for well above $100 before other stock splits as well, e.g. in 1999, 1997, 1995, and 1993. Adjusted for inflation, that likely pencils out for roughly $200 in today's dollars. When we compare these prices to Intel's current share price, it looks like there is one good reason for Intel's decision to not split its shares in the last twenty years --<i>they are too cheap for a split</i>. In the past, Intel split its shares regularly when they rose to levels well above $100, but since shares are far from that level today, there just is no good reason to conduct a stock split right now.</p><p><blockquote>在其他股票分割之前，股票交易价格也远高于100美元，例如1999年、1997年、1995年和1993年。经通货膨胀调整后，按今天的美元计算，这一数字可能约为200美元。当我们将这些价格与英特尔当前的股价进行比较时，英特尔在过去二十年中决定不拆股似乎有一个很好的理由——<i>它们太便宜了，不适合分割</i>过去，当股价升至远高于100美元的水平时，英特尔会定期进行股票分割，但由于如今股价远未达到这一水平，因此现在没有充分的理由进行股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> In an age where fractional shares can be bought easily through most brokers, stock splits have become less important overall. However, there are still some advantages to stock splits, e.g. when it comes to index inclusion, or when it comes to the ease of using options. With Intel's shares trading in the $50s, however, these arguments are not really valid, and one can summarize that there would not be any clear benefit from a stock split. Therefore, I doubt that Intel will do a stock split in the near term, at least unless its shares rally massively. Intel has a share count of roughly 4 billion today, which is a pretty large number already, and there is no real benefit from doubling that number by cutting the share price in half. Over the last decade, this number has dropped from around 5.3 billion to where it stands right now, but Intel would need to repurchase shares for many more years before the share count drops to a number that could be called \"too low\". For now, I thus believe that a stock split is unlikely, and that also holds true for the foreseeable future. It is, of course, possible that Intel does a stock split a decade from now if it manages to regain its footing in major markets and if its profitability and valuation improve. In that case, shares could eventually rise well above where they trade today, which may result in a stock split. Future stock splits are thus not ruled out completely, but it looks like there is no reason to do one in the near or medium term.</p><p><blockquote>在一个可以通过大多数经纪人轻松购买零碎股票的时代，股票分割总体上已经变得不那么重要了。然而，股票分割仍然有一些优势，例如当涉及到指数纳入，或者当涉及到使用期权的便利性时。然而，由于英特尔的股价在50美元左右，这些论点并不真正有效，人们可以得出结论，股票分割不会带来任何明显的好处。因此，我怀疑英特尔是否会在短期内进行股票分割，至少除非其股价大幅上涨。英特尔目前的股票数量约为40亿股，这已经是一个相当大的数字，通过将股价减半来使这一数字翻倍并没有真正的好处。在过去十年中，这一数字已从约53亿美元下降到目前的水平，但英特尔还需要回购股票多年，才能使股票数量降至“过低”的数字。因此，目前我认为不太可能进行股票分割，在可预见的未来也是如此。当然，如果英特尔设法在主要市场重新站稳脚跟，并且其盈利能力和估值有所改善，它有可能在十年后进行股票分割。在这种情况下，股价最终可能会远高于今天的交易价格，这可能会导致股票分割。因此，未来的股票分割并没有完全排除，但看起来没有理由在近期或中期进行股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>INTC Stock Forecast</b></h3> Wall Street analysts have a stock price target of $63 over the next year, which, combined with the dividend, would result in total returns of more than 20%, which would undoubtedly be attractive. At the same time, however, the consensus rating on the stock is<i>Neutral</i>, which may mean that analysts are not too convinced that their models are very precise.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>INTC股票预测</b></h3>华尔街分析师将明年的股价目标定为63美元，再加上股息，总回报率将超过20%，这无疑具有吸引力。但与此同时，该股的一致评级为<i>中立的</i>，这可能意味着分析师不太相信他们的模型非常精确。</blockquote></p><p> Looking at Seeking Alpha's&nbsp;Quant Rating&nbsp;on the stock, we see a reading of 3.46, which is Neutral as well, although bordering on the edge of Bullish. The main issue for Intel's Quant score is its weak growth, which offsets the very strong value rating. Intel's strong value rating isn't a large surprise, as shares are valued at just 11x forward profits, which compares very favorably to the likes of AMD (43x forward earnings) and NVIDIA (49x forward earnings).</p><p><blockquote>看看Seeking Alpha对该股的量化评级，我们看到读数为3.46，也是中性的，尽管接近看涨的边缘。英特尔量化评分的主要问题是其增长疲软，这抵消了非常强劲的价值评级。英特尔强劲的价值评级并不令人意外，因为其股价预期利润仅为11倍，与AMD（预期收益43倍）和NVIDIA（预期收益49倍）等公司相比非常有利。</blockquote></p><p> Intel has, despite its strong profitability and large size, not been able to really capitalize on the growth of the global chip industry. Process delays and market share losses in high-value areas such as data centers have led to underperformance when it comes to profit growth versus its peers, and it looks like this will not change in the very near term. 2021 will be a flat-to-down year, and 2022 will likely not see any meaningful profit growth, either. Growth investments in Arizona and potential&nbsp;new multi-billion dollar plants&nbsp;in the US should positively impact Intel's growth eventually, but these investments will take years before starting to generate profits -- this will not help Intel improve its position in 2021. A while ago I estimated Intel's return potential in the&nbsp;high-single-digits&nbsp;range for the long run, with about one-third of that coming from the dividend. This is far from bad, and I assume that holding Intel will not be a bad decision at this time. I don't think that Intel must necessarily be an outrageously strong buy today, however -- investors may want to wait for even lower prices (looking at Intel's chart, this happens from time to time), or wait for a clearer picture about Intel's future, e.g. when it comes to the question of how well the company is doing with its new processes.</p><p><blockquote>尽管英特尔盈利能力强、规模大，但它未能真正利用全球芯片行业的增长。数据中心等高价值领域的流程延迟和市场份额损失导致其在利润增长方面表现不佳，而且这种情况在短期内不会改变。2021年将是持平到下降的一年，2022年也可能不会出现任何有意义的利润增长。亚利桑那州的增长投资和美国潜在的数十亿美元新工厂最终应该会对英特尔的增长产生积极影响，但这些投资需要数年时间才能开始产生利润——这无助于英特尔在2021年改善其地位。不久前，我估计英特尔的长期回报潜力在高个位数范围内，其中大约三分之一来自股息。这远非坏事，我认为此时持有英特尔不会是一个糟糕的决定。然而，我不认为英特尔今天一定是一个异常强劲的买入对象——投资者可能希望等待更低的价格（看看英特尔的图表，这种情况时有发生），或者等待更清晰的了解英特尔的未来，例如当涉及到该公司在新流程方面做得如何的问题时。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <h3><b>Is Intel Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold Right Now?</b></h3> Intel, overall, is still a leading semi company when it comes to output, revenue, cash generation, and R&amp;D power. Its new CEO Pat Gelsinger seems to be making the right moves to position the company for the future, but at the same time, Intel is a pretty large ship to turn around, and for now, others such as NVIDIA seem to be leaner and more agile. Investing in Intel could pay off handsomely if the company gets back on growth track a couple of years from now, as this would leave a lot of multiple expansion potential. A successful turnaround towards stronger profit growth is not guaranteed, however. The near-term outlook is thus not very strong, although the low valuation could still leave upside potential if sentiment about Intel's future plans improves. In the longer run, Intel has opportunities to deliver shareholder gains, but the outlook is still clouded and uncertainties about execution remain. For now, we are neutral on Intel.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>英特尔股票现在是买入、卖出还是持有？</b></h3>总体而言，就产量、收入、现金产生和研发能力而言，英特尔仍然是领先的半导体公司。其新任首席执行官帕特·基辛格(Pat Gelsinger)似乎正在采取正确的举措，为公司的未来定位，但与此同时，英特尔是一艘需要掉头的大船，而就目前而言，英伟达等其他公司似乎更精简、更敏捷。如果英特尔在几年后重回增长轨道，投资英特尔可能会获得丰厚的回报，因为这将留下大量的多重扩张潜力。然而，并不能保证成功实现更强劲的利润增长。因此，近期前景不是很强劲，尽管如果对英特尔未来计划的情绪改善，低估值仍可能留下上涨潜力。从长远来看，英特尔有机会为股东带来收益，但前景仍然阴云密布，执行方面的不确定性仍然存在。目前，我们对英特尔持中立态度。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Stock Split: Will Another One Ever Happen?<blockquote>英特尔股票分割：还会发生另一次吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Stock Split: Will Another One Ever Happen?<blockquote>英特尔股票分割：还会发生另一次吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-20 17:47</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><h3><b>Summary</b></h3> <ul>  <li>Many tech names have done stock splits in 2020 and 2021 that got a lot of attention.</li>  <li>INTC has split its shares oftentimes in the past, but not in the last 20 years. We'll look at the reasons and what they mean for the future.</li>  <li>Intel has some issues, but on the other hand, shares are pretty inexpensive and offer an above-average yield. All in all, Intel does neither look especially strong nor especially bad.</li>  <li>I do much more than just articles at Cash Flow Kingdom: Members get access to model portfolios, regular updates, a chat room, and more.</li> </ul> <h3><b>Article Thesis</b></h3> Due to reader demand, we'll take a look at whether Intel Corporation (INTC) might conduct another stock split in the foreseeable future. Peers such as NVIDIA (NVDA) have done so in the recent past, thus the idea is not completely outlandish. At the same time, however, it should be noted that Intel's share price has been languishing in the recent past, and since shares are far from expensive, I believe that a stock split in the near term is unlikely.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>总结</b></h3><ul><li>许多科技公司在2020年和2021年进行了股票分割，引起了广泛关注。</li><li>INTC过去经常进行股票分割，但在过去20年里没有。我们将看看原因以及它们对未来的意义。</li><li>英特尔存在一些问题，但另一方面，股价相当便宜，收益率高于平均水平。总而言之，英特尔看起来既不是特别强大，也不是特别糟糕。</li><li>我在现金流王国做的不仅仅是文章：会员可以访问模型投资组合、定期更新、聊天室等等。</li></ul><h3><b>文章论文</b></h3>由于读者的需求，我们将看看英特尔公司（INTC）是否可能在可预见的未来进行另一次股票分割。英伟达（NVDA）等同行最近已经这样做了，因此这个想法并不完全奇怪。但与此同时，应该指出的是，英特尔的股价最近一直低迷，由于股价远非昂贵，我认为短期内不太可能进行股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>INTC Stock Price</b></h3> Intel Corporation is a leading semiconductor company in terms of revenue generation and output, but due to problems with new processes, and due to declining market share versus peers such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a> (AMD), its shares have vastly underperformed the broad semiconductor industry in recent years:</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>INTC股价</b></h3>就收入和产量而言，英特尔公司是一家领先的半导体公司，但由于新工艺的问题，以及与同行相比市场份额下降，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">英伟达公司</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>（AMD），其股价近年来的表现远远落后于整个半导体行业：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/43a79e5a532c48440cc2ab0a982ad3d4\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Data by&nbsp;YCharts</p><p><blockquote>数据来自YCharts</blockquote></p><p> With a 70% return over five years, Intel has been far from a bad investment, as this still pencils out to about 11% a year. But compared to its peers and the semiconductor industry as a whole (SOXX), Intel Corporation's returns look pretty bad, as others have seen their shares rise by 300%+ in the same time frame. With a market capitalization of $210 billion, Intel is cheaper than NVIDIA, despite the fact that Intel generates much higher revenue, earnings, and cash flow -- the market is valuing NVIDIA at a premium due to its better growth and more attractive product lineup. At current prices of around $53, Intel is trading ~20% below the consensus price target of $63, which indicates solid upside potential over the next year. Based on current earnings per share estimates for this year, Intel Corporation trades for 11x net profits, which is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the lowest valuations in the semiconductor industry, and which represents a clear discount compared to how the broad market is valued. At the same time, Intel also offers a dividend yield of 2.6% today -- which is roughly twice as much as the S&amp;P 500's (SPY) yield.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔五年内的回报率为70%，这远非一项糟糕的投资，因为每年的回报率仍高达11%左右。但与同行和整个半导体行业(SOXX)相比，英特尔公司的回报看起来相当糟糕，因为其他公司的股价在同一时间内上涨了300%以上。英特尔的市值为2100亿美元，但比英伟达便宜，尽管英特尔的收入、盈利和现金流要高得多——由于其更好的增长和更具吸引力的产品阵容，市场对英伟达的估值过高。以目前约53美元的价格计算，英特尔的交易价格比63美元的共识目标价低约20%，这表明明年具有强劲的上涨潜力。根据目前对今年每股收益的预测，英特尔公司的净利润为11倍，即<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>是半导体行业估值最低的，与大盘估值相比有明显的折扣。与此同时，英特尔今天还提供2.6%的股息收益率，大约是标普500（SPDR标普500指数ETF）收益率的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>Is Intel Stock Likely To Split Again</b></h3> In 2020 and 2021, stock splits have gotten a lot of attention, as huge companies such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> (AAPL) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> (TSLA) did them, while there was also&nbsp;speculation&nbsp;that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> (AMZN) could be interested in doing a stock split. Not too long ago, NVIDIA, one of Intel's main competitors,&nbsp;did a stock split as well.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>英特尔股票可能再次分割吗</b></h3>2020年和2021年，股票分割受到了很多关注，因为像<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>(AAPL)和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>（特斯拉）做到了，同时也有人猜测<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">亚马逊</a>（AMZN）可能有兴趣进行股票分割。不久前，英特尔的主要竞争对手之一英伟达也进行了股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> Some readers are interested in knowing whether Intel might do a stock split as well, which is why we can try to gauge the pros and cons of that. Let's first look at Intel's stock split history:</p><p><blockquote>一些读者有兴趣知道英特尔是否也可能进行股票分割，这就是为什么我们可以尝试衡量其利弊。我们先来看看英特尔的股票分割历史：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4744a6590d2621204996b265d995a823\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"727\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <i>Source:</i>&nbsp;<i>Intel Corporation</i></p><p><blockquote><i>资料来源：</i> <i>英特尔公司</i></blockquote></p><p> We see that the company has done stock splits repeatedly in the past, with a total of 13 stock splits recorded on the company's website. Clearly, the company has not been reluctant to split its shares in the past. At the same time, however, we can also note that the series of stock splits stopped in 2000, i.e. a little more than two decades ago. Not a single stock split was recorded since then, which means that the company has seemingly seen no good reason to split its stock since then. When Intel did its last stock split in 2000, its shares were trading at well above $100 and as high as $150 at some point. In other words, when Intel did its last stock split, its shares were trading with a relatively high nominal price, which was, of course, the result of the dot.com bubble during which Intel saw its shares explode upwards. Since then, shares have not regained their former strength, as they continue to trade below their highs from back then -- even following the 2-1 split that occurred in July 2000.</p><p><blockquote>我们看到该公司过去曾多次进行股票分割，公司网站上总共记录了13次股票分割。显然，该公司过去并不不愿意拆股。但与此同时，我们也可以注意到，一系列股票分割在2000年停止，也就是二十多年前。从那时起，没有进行过一次股票分割，这意味着该公司似乎没有看到从那时起分割股票的充分理由。当英特尔在2000年进行最后一次股票分割时，其股价远高于100美元，有时甚至高达150美元。换句话说，当英特尔上次进行股票分割时，其股票的名义价格相对较高，这当然是互联网泡沫的结果，在此期间英特尔股价爆炸式上涨。从那时起，股价就没有恢复到以前的强势，因为即使在2000年7月发生2-1的分割之后，它们的交易价格仍然低于当时的高点。</blockquote></p><p> When we look at other stock splits, we see a similar pattern:</p><p><blockquote>当我们观察其他股票分割时，我们会看到类似的模式：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccb1e1f3475ca38ef9dc7cbb0216124a\" tg-width=\"461\" tg-height=\"380\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Source:</i>&nbsp;<i>getsplithistory.com</i></p><p><blockquote><i>资料来源：</i> <i>getsplithistory.com</i></blockquote></p><p> Shares did trade for well above $100 before other stock splits as well, e.g. in 1999, 1997, 1995, and 1993. Adjusted for inflation, that likely pencils out for roughly $200 in today's dollars. When we compare these prices to Intel's current share price, it looks like there is one good reason for Intel's decision to not split its shares in the last twenty years --<i>they are too cheap for a split</i>. In the past, Intel split its shares regularly when they rose to levels well above $100, but since shares are far from that level today, there just is no good reason to conduct a stock split right now.</p><p><blockquote>在其他股票分割之前，股票交易价格也远高于100美元，例如1999年、1997年、1995年和1993年。经通货膨胀调整后，按今天的美元计算，这一数字可能约为200美元。当我们将这些价格与英特尔当前的股价进行比较时，英特尔在过去二十年中决定不拆股似乎有一个很好的理由——<i>它们太便宜了，不适合分割</i>过去，当股价升至远高于100美元的水平时，英特尔会定期进行股票分割，但由于如今股价远未达到这一水平，因此现在没有充分的理由进行股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> In an age where fractional shares can be bought easily through most brokers, stock splits have become less important overall. However, there are still some advantages to stock splits, e.g. when it comes to index inclusion, or when it comes to the ease of using options. With Intel's shares trading in the $50s, however, these arguments are not really valid, and one can summarize that there would not be any clear benefit from a stock split. Therefore, I doubt that Intel will do a stock split in the near term, at least unless its shares rally massively. Intel has a share count of roughly 4 billion today, which is a pretty large number already, and there is no real benefit from doubling that number by cutting the share price in half. Over the last decade, this number has dropped from around 5.3 billion to where it stands right now, but Intel would need to repurchase shares for many more years before the share count drops to a number that could be called \"too low\". For now, I thus believe that a stock split is unlikely, and that also holds true for the foreseeable future. It is, of course, possible that Intel does a stock split a decade from now if it manages to regain its footing in major markets and if its profitability and valuation improve. In that case, shares could eventually rise well above where they trade today, which may result in a stock split. Future stock splits are thus not ruled out completely, but it looks like there is no reason to do one in the near or medium term.</p><p><blockquote>在一个可以通过大多数经纪人轻松购买零碎股票的时代，股票分割总体上已经变得不那么重要了。然而，股票分割仍然有一些优势，例如当涉及到指数纳入，或者当涉及到使用期权的便利性时。然而，由于英特尔的股价在50美元左右，这些论点并不真正有效，人们可以得出结论，股票分割不会带来任何明显的好处。因此，我怀疑英特尔是否会在短期内进行股票分割，至少除非其股价大幅上涨。英特尔目前的股票数量约为40亿股，这已经是一个相当大的数字，通过将股价减半来使这一数字翻倍并没有真正的好处。在过去十年中，这一数字已从约53亿美元下降到目前的水平，但英特尔还需要回购股票多年，才能使股票数量降至“过低”的数字。因此，目前我认为不太可能进行股票分割，在可预见的未来也是如此。当然，如果英特尔设法在主要市场重新站稳脚跟，并且其盈利能力和估值有所改善，它有可能在十年后进行股票分割。在这种情况下，股价最终可能会远高于今天的交易价格，这可能会导致股票分割。因此，未来的股票分割并没有完全排除，但看起来没有理由在近期或中期进行股票分割。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>INTC Stock Forecast</b></h3> Wall Street analysts have a stock price target of $63 over the next year, which, combined with the dividend, would result in total returns of more than 20%, which would undoubtedly be attractive. At the same time, however, the consensus rating on the stock is<i>Neutral</i>, which may mean that analysts are not too convinced that their models are very precise.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>INTC股票预测</b></h3>华尔街分析师将明年的股价目标定为63美元，再加上股息，总回报率将超过20%，这无疑具有吸引力。但与此同时，该股的一致评级为<i>中立的</i>，这可能意味着分析师不太相信他们的模型非常精确。</blockquote></p><p> Looking at Seeking Alpha's&nbsp;Quant Rating&nbsp;on the stock, we see a reading of 3.46, which is Neutral as well, although bordering on the edge of Bullish. The main issue for Intel's Quant score is its weak growth, which offsets the very strong value rating. Intel's strong value rating isn't a large surprise, as shares are valued at just 11x forward profits, which compares very favorably to the likes of AMD (43x forward earnings) and NVIDIA (49x forward earnings).</p><p><blockquote>看看Seeking Alpha对该股的量化评级，我们看到读数为3.46，也是中性的，尽管接近看涨的边缘。英特尔量化评分的主要问题是其增长疲软，这抵消了非常强劲的价值评级。英特尔强劲的价值评级并不令人意外，因为其股价预期利润仅为11倍，与AMD（预期收益43倍）和NVIDIA（预期收益49倍）等公司相比非常有利。</blockquote></p><p> Intel has, despite its strong profitability and large size, not been able to really capitalize on the growth of the global chip industry. Process delays and market share losses in high-value areas such as data centers have led to underperformance when it comes to profit growth versus its peers, and it looks like this will not change in the very near term. 2021 will be a flat-to-down year, and 2022 will likely not see any meaningful profit growth, either. Growth investments in Arizona and potential&nbsp;new multi-billion dollar plants&nbsp;in the US should positively impact Intel's growth eventually, but these investments will take years before starting to generate profits -- this will not help Intel improve its position in 2021. A while ago I estimated Intel's return potential in the&nbsp;high-single-digits&nbsp;range for the long run, with about one-third of that coming from the dividend. This is far from bad, and I assume that holding Intel will not be a bad decision at this time. I don't think that Intel must necessarily be an outrageously strong buy today, however -- investors may want to wait for even lower prices (looking at Intel's chart, this happens from time to time), or wait for a clearer picture about Intel's future, e.g. when it comes to the question of how well the company is doing with its new processes.</p><p><blockquote>尽管英特尔盈利能力强、规模大，但它未能真正利用全球芯片行业的增长。数据中心等高价值领域的流程延迟和市场份额损失导致其在利润增长方面表现不佳，而且这种情况在短期内不会改变。2021年将是持平到下降的一年，2022年也可能不会出现任何有意义的利润增长。亚利桑那州的增长投资和美国潜在的数十亿美元新工厂最终应该会对英特尔的增长产生积极影响，但这些投资需要数年时间才能开始产生利润——这无助于英特尔在2021年改善其地位。不久前，我估计英特尔的长期回报潜力在高个位数范围内，其中大约三分之一来自股息。这远非坏事，我认为此时持有英特尔不会是一个糟糕的决定。然而，我不认为英特尔今天一定是一个异常强劲的买入对象——投资者可能希望等待更低的价格（看看英特尔的图表，这种情况时有发生），或者等待更清晰的了解英特尔的未来，例如当涉及到该公司在新流程方面做得如何的问题时。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <h3><b>Is Intel Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold Right Now?</b></h3> Intel, overall, is still a leading semi company when it comes to output, revenue, cash generation, and R&amp;D power. Its new CEO Pat Gelsinger seems to be making the right moves to position the company for the future, but at the same time, Intel is a pretty large ship to turn around, and for now, others such as NVIDIA seem to be leaner and more agile. Investing in Intel could pay off handsomely if the company gets back on growth track a couple of years from now, as this would leave a lot of multiple expansion potential. A successful turnaround towards stronger profit growth is not guaranteed, however. The near-term outlook is thus not very strong, although the low valuation could still leave upside potential if sentiment about Intel's future plans improves. In the longer run, Intel has opportunities to deliver shareholder gains, but the outlook is still clouded and uncertainties about execution remain. For now, we are neutral on Intel.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>英特尔股票现在是买入、卖出还是持有？</b></h3>总体而言，就产量、收入、现金产生和研发能力而言，英特尔仍然是领先的半导体公司。其新任首席执行官帕特·基辛格(Pat Gelsinger)似乎正在采取正确的举措，为公司的未来定位，但与此同时，英特尔是一艘需要掉头的大船，而就目前而言，英伟达等其他公司似乎更精简、更敏捷。如果英特尔在几年后重回增长轨道，投资英特尔可能会获得丰厚的回报，因为这将留下大量的多重扩张潜力。然而，并不能保证成功实现更强劲的利润增长。因此，近期前景不是很强劲，尽管如果对英特尔未来计划的情绪改善，低估值仍可能留下上涨潜力。从长远来看，英特尔有机会为股东带来收益，但前景仍然阴云密布，执行方面的不确定性仍然存在。目前，我们对英特尔持中立态度。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4450549-intel-stock-split-will-another-one-happen\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4450549-intel-stock-split-will-another-one-happen","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124578118","content_text":"Summary\n\nMany tech names have done stock splits in 2020 and 2021 that got a lot of attention.\nINTC has split its shares oftentimes in the past, but not in the last 20 years. We'll look at the reasons and what they mean for the future.\nIntel has some issues, but on the other hand, shares are pretty inexpensive and offer an above-average yield. All in all, Intel does neither look especially strong nor especially bad.\nI do much more than just articles at Cash Flow Kingdom: Members get access to model portfolios, regular updates, a chat room, and more.\n\nArticle Thesis\nDue to reader demand, we'll take a look at whether Intel Corporation (INTC) might conduct another stock split in the foreseeable future. Peers such as NVIDIA (NVDA) have done so in the recent past, thus the idea is not completely outlandish. At the same time, however, it should be noted that Intel's share price has been languishing in the recent past, and since shares are far from expensive, I believe that a stock split in the near term is unlikely.\nINTC Stock Price\nIntel Corporation is a leading semiconductor company in terms of revenue generation and output, but due to problems with new processes, and due to declining market share versus peers such as NVIDIA Corp and AMD (AMD), its shares have vastly underperformed the broad semiconductor industry in recent years:\nData by YCharts\nWith a 70% return over five years, Intel has been far from a bad investment, as this still pencils out to about 11% a year. But compared to its peers and the semiconductor industry as a whole (SOXX), Intel Corporation's returns look pretty bad, as others have seen their shares rise by 300%+ in the same time frame. With a market capitalization of $210 billion, Intel is cheaper than NVIDIA, despite the fact that Intel generates much higher revenue, earnings, and cash flow -- the market is valuing NVIDIA at a premium due to its better growth and more attractive product lineup. At current prices of around $53, Intel is trading ~20% below the consensus price target of $63, which indicates solid upside potential over the next year. Based on current earnings per share estimates for this year, Intel Corporation trades for 11x net profits, which is one of the lowest valuations in the semiconductor industry, and which represents a clear discount compared to how the broad market is valued. At the same time, Intel also offers a dividend yield of 2.6% today -- which is roughly twice as much as the S&P 500's (SPY) yield.\nIs Intel Stock Likely To Split Again\nIn 2020 and 2021, stock splits have gotten a lot of attention, as huge companies such as Apple (AAPL) and Tesla Motors (TSLA) did them, while there was also speculation that Amazon.com (AMZN) could be interested in doing a stock split. Not too long ago, NVIDIA, one of Intel's main competitors, did a stock split as well.\nSome readers are interested in knowing whether Intel might do a stock split as well, which is why we can try to gauge the pros and cons of that. Let's first look at Intel's stock split history:\n\nSource: Intel Corporation\nWe see that the company has done stock splits repeatedly in the past, with a total of 13 stock splits recorded on the company's website. Clearly, the company has not been reluctant to split its shares in the past. At the same time, however, we can also note that the series of stock splits stopped in 2000, i.e. a little more than two decades ago. Not a single stock split was recorded since then, which means that the company has seemingly seen no good reason to split its stock since then. When Intel did its last stock split in 2000, its shares were trading at well above $100 and as high as $150 at some point. In other words, when Intel did its last stock split, its shares were trading with a relatively high nominal price, which was, of course, the result of the dot.com bubble during which Intel saw its shares explode upwards. Since then, shares have not regained their former strength, as they continue to trade below their highs from back then -- even following the 2-1 split that occurred in July 2000.\nWhen we look at other stock splits, we see a similar pattern:\nSource: getsplithistory.com\nShares did trade for well above $100 before other stock splits as well, e.g. in 1999, 1997, 1995, and 1993. Adjusted for inflation, that likely pencils out for roughly $200 in today's dollars. When we compare these prices to Intel's current share price, it looks like there is one good reason for Intel's decision to not split its shares in the last twenty years --they are too cheap for a split. In the past, Intel split its shares regularly when they rose to levels well above $100, but since shares are far from that level today, there just is no good reason to conduct a stock split right now.\nIn an age where fractional shares can be bought easily through most brokers, stock splits have become less important overall. However, there are still some advantages to stock splits, e.g. when it comes to index inclusion, or when it comes to the ease of using options. With Intel's shares trading in the $50s, however, these arguments are not really valid, and one can summarize that there would not be any clear benefit from a stock split. Therefore, I doubt that Intel will do a stock split in the near term, at least unless its shares rally massively. Intel has a share count of roughly 4 billion today, which is a pretty large number already, and there is no real benefit from doubling that number by cutting the share price in half. Over the last decade, this number has dropped from around 5.3 billion to where it stands right now, but Intel would need to repurchase shares for many more years before the share count drops to a number that could be called \"too low\". For now, I thus believe that a stock split is unlikely, and that also holds true for the foreseeable future. It is, of course, possible that Intel does a stock split a decade from now if it manages to regain its footing in major markets and if its profitability and valuation improve. In that case, shares could eventually rise well above where they trade today, which may result in a stock split. Future stock splits are thus not ruled out completely, but it looks like there is no reason to do one in the near or medium term.\nINTC Stock Forecast\nWall Street analysts have a stock price target of $63 over the next year, which, combined with the dividend, would result in total returns of more than 20%, which would undoubtedly be attractive. At the same time, however, the consensus rating on the stock isNeutral, which may mean that analysts are not too convinced that their models are very precise.\nLooking at Seeking Alpha's Quant Rating on the stock, we see a reading of 3.46, which is Neutral as well, although bordering on the edge of Bullish. The main issue for Intel's Quant score is its weak growth, which offsets the very strong value rating. Intel's strong value rating isn't a large surprise, as shares are valued at just 11x forward profits, which compares very favorably to the likes of AMD (43x forward earnings) and NVIDIA (49x forward earnings).\nIntel has, despite its strong profitability and large size, not been able to really capitalize on the growth of the global chip industry. Process delays and market share losses in high-value areas such as data centers have led to underperformance when it comes to profit growth versus its peers, and it looks like this will not change in the very near term. 2021 will be a flat-to-down year, and 2022 will likely not see any meaningful profit growth, either. Growth investments in Arizona and potential new multi-billion dollar plants in the US should positively impact Intel's growth eventually, but these investments will take years before starting to generate profits -- this will not help Intel improve its position in 2021. A while ago I estimated Intel's return potential in the high-single-digits range for the long run, with about one-third of that coming from the dividend. This is far from bad, and I assume that holding Intel will not be a bad decision at this time. I don't think that Intel must necessarily be an outrageously strong buy today, however -- investors may want to wait for even lower prices (looking at Intel's chart, this happens from time to time), or wait for a clearer picture about Intel's future, e.g. when it comes to the question of how well the company is doing with its new processes.\nIs Intel Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold Right Now?\nIntel, overall, is still a leading semi company when it comes to output, revenue, cash generation, and R&D power. Its new CEO Pat Gelsinger seems to be making the right moves to position the company for the future, but at the same time, Intel is a pretty large ship to turn around, and for now, others such as NVIDIA seem to be leaner and more agile. Investing in Intel could pay off handsomely if the company gets back on growth track a couple of years from now, as this would leave a lot of multiple expansion potential. A successful turnaround towards stronger profit growth is not guaranteed, however. The near-term outlook is thus not very strong, although the low valuation could still leave upside potential if sentiment about Intel's future plans improves. In the longer run, Intel has opportunities to deliver shareholder gains, but the outlook is still clouded and uncertainties about execution remain. For now, we are neutral on Intel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170207117,"gmtCreate":1626432908539,"gmtModify":1631892902964,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170207117","repostId":"1130012448","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130012448","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626428482,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1130012448?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 17:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why BlackBerry, GameStop, and Kodak Stocks Got Destroyed This Week<blockquote>为什么黑莓、游戏驿站和柯达的股票本周被摧毁</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130012448","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nIt's been a bad week for \"meme stock\" investors so far, aspredictions of doommounted f","content":"<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么</blockquote></p><p> It's been a bad week for \"meme stock\" investors so far, aspredictions of doommounted for stocks with bad business prospects and no profits to fall back on.</p><p><blockquote>到目前为止，对于“模因股票”投资者来说，这是糟糕的一周，因为对商业前景不佳且没有利润可依靠的股票的末日预测不断增加。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks' bad news actually began a week ago, when investment bank Goldman Sachs observed that retail investors' willingness to risk their moneybetting on short squeezes-- that might or might not happen -- was waning. In the second quarter, warned the banker, trading volumes at retail brokerages showed as much as a 30% sequential decline in meme stock buying. And of course, it's hard to create a short squeeze without buyers.</p><p><blockquote>Meme股票的坏消息实际上始于一周前，当时投资银行高盛观察到，散户投资者将资金押注于空头挤压（这种情况可能会发生，也可能不会发生）的意愿正在减弱。这位银行家警告说，第二季度，零售券商的交易量显示meme股票购买量环比下降了30%。当然，没有买家就很难造成轧空。</blockquote></p><p> Result: Meme stocks took a tumble, with&nbsp;<b>Eastman Kodak</b>(NYSE:KODK)closing Thursday down 8.5% from Friday's close,<b>BlackBerry Limited</b>(NYSE:BB)losing 10.4%, and&nbsp;<b>GameStop</b>(NYSE:GME)crashing to a 12.8% loss.</p><p><blockquote>结果：模因股票暴跌，<b>伊士曼柯达</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：KODK）周四收盘较周五收盘下跌8.5%，<b>黑莓有限公司</b>(NYSE：BB)下跌10.4%，以及<b>游戏驿站</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：GME）暴跌12.8%。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Only in one instance was there actual news to explain the declines. In fact, more than half of GameStop's losses for the week came on just one trading day -- Wednesday -- when Bloomberg reported that&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;is eying an entryinto the video game space, in which it will de facto compete with GameStop.</p><p><blockquote>只有在一个例子中，有实际的新闻来解释下降。事实上，游戏驿站本周一半以上的损失发生在周三一个交易日，当时彭博社报道称<b>Netflix</b>正在着眼于进入视频游戏领域，事实上它将与游戏驿站竞争。</blockquote></p><p> As for the other companies, though -- and as for meme stocks in general<i>--</i>it's primarily a shift in sentiment against the companies that's weighing on their stock prices. Following up on Goldman's negative take, Franklin Resources CEO Jenny Johnson chimed in on Wednesday with a warning that traders \"could lose everything\" if they persist in buying meme stocks.</p><p><blockquote>不过，对于其他公司以及一般的模因股票来说<i>--</i>这主要是对公司情绪的转变，给它们的股价带来压力。继高盛的负面看法之后，富兰克林资源公司首席执行官珍妮·约翰逊周三插话警告说，如果交易员坚持购买模因股票，“可能会失去一切”。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在怎么办</blockquote></p><p> Attractive as it might be to think you're \"sticking it to the man\" on Wall Street by buying stocks that \"hedge funds\" are shorting, the simple truth is that neither BlackBerry nor Kodak has earned any profit whatsoever since 2019 -- and GameStop hasn't earned a profit since 2018.</p><p><blockquote>尽管认为你通过购买“对冲基金”做空的股票来“坚持华尔街的人”可能很有吸引力，但简单的事实是，自2019年以来，黑莓和柯达都没有赚取任何利润——游戏驿站自2018年以来就没有盈利。</blockquote></p><p> \"I never like investing where there isn't fundamentals behind it,\" Johnson told Yahoo! Finance Wednesday. While it's certainly true that a lucky few traders could make -- indeed, have made -- money trying to time the market on meme stocks, there's no underlying value to the companies behind the stock tickers -- no profits. That means, the moment sentiment turns against them, there's literally nothing left to prop up the stock price.</p><p><blockquote>“我从来不喜欢在没有基本面的情况下进行投资，”约翰逊告诉雅虎！财经周三。虽然少数幸运的交易者确实可以——事实上已经——通过尝试在模因股票上把握市场时机来赚钱，但股票代码背后的公司没有潜在价值——没有利润。这意味着，一旦情绪对他们不利，就没有什么可以支撑股价了。</blockquote></p><p> Johnson just thinks that's a bad way to invest, andI cannot disagree.</p><p><blockquote>约翰逊只是认为这是一种糟糕的投资方式，我不能不同意。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why BlackBerry, GameStop, and Kodak Stocks Got Destroyed This Week<blockquote>为什么黑莓、游戏驿站和柯达的股票本周被摧毁</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy BlackBerry, GameStop, and Kodak Stocks Got Destroyed This Week<blockquote>为什么黑莓、游戏驿站和柯达的股票本周被摧毁</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-16 17:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么</blockquote></p><p> It's been a bad week for \"meme stock\" investors so far, aspredictions of doommounted for stocks with bad business prospects and no profits to fall back on.</p><p><blockquote>到目前为止，对于“模因股票”投资者来说，这是糟糕的一周，因为对商业前景不佳且没有利润可依靠的股票的末日预测不断增加。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks' bad news actually began a week ago, when investment bank Goldman Sachs observed that retail investors' willingness to risk their moneybetting on short squeezes-- that might or might not happen -- was waning. In the second quarter, warned the banker, trading volumes at retail brokerages showed as much as a 30% sequential decline in meme stock buying. And of course, it's hard to create a short squeeze without buyers.</p><p><blockquote>Meme股票的坏消息实际上始于一周前，当时投资银行高盛观察到，散户投资者将资金押注于空头挤压（这种情况可能会发生，也可能不会发生）的意愿正在减弱。这位银行家警告说，第二季度，零售券商的交易量显示meme股票购买量环比下降了30%。当然，没有买家就很难造成轧空。</blockquote></p><p> Result: Meme stocks took a tumble, with&nbsp;<b>Eastman Kodak</b>(NYSE:KODK)closing Thursday down 8.5% from Friday's close,<b>BlackBerry Limited</b>(NYSE:BB)losing 10.4%, and&nbsp;<b>GameStop</b>(NYSE:GME)crashing to a 12.8% loss.</p><p><blockquote>结果：模因股票暴跌，<b>伊士曼柯达</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：KODK）周四收盘较周五收盘下跌8.5%，<b>黑莓有限公司</b>(NYSE：BB)下跌10.4%，以及<b>游戏驿站</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：GME）暴跌12.8%。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Only in one instance was there actual news to explain the declines. In fact, more than half of GameStop's losses for the week came on just one trading day -- Wednesday -- when Bloomberg reported that&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;is eying an entryinto the video game space, in which it will de facto compete with GameStop.</p><p><blockquote>只有在一个例子中，有实际的新闻来解释下降。事实上，游戏驿站本周一半以上的损失发生在周三一个交易日，当时彭博社报道称<b>Netflix</b>正在着眼于进入视频游戏领域，事实上它将与游戏驿站竞争。</blockquote></p><p> As for the other companies, though -- and as for meme stocks in general<i>--</i>it's primarily a shift in sentiment against the companies that's weighing on their stock prices. Following up on Goldman's negative take, Franklin Resources CEO Jenny Johnson chimed in on Wednesday with a warning that traders \"could lose everything\" if they persist in buying meme stocks.</p><p><blockquote>不过，对于其他公司以及一般的模因股票来说<i>--</i>这主要是对公司情绪的转变，给它们的股价带来压力。继高盛的负面看法之后，富兰克林资源公司首席执行官珍妮·约翰逊周三插话警告说，如果交易员坚持购买模因股票，“可能会失去一切”。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在怎么办</blockquote></p><p> Attractive as it might be to think you're \"sticking it to the man\" on Wall Street by buying stocks that \"hedge funds\" are shorting, the simple truth is that neither BlackBerry nor Kodak has earned any profit whatsoever since 2019 -- and GameStop hasn't earned a profit since 2018.</p><p><blockquote>尽管认为你通过购买“对冲基金”做空的股票来“坚持华尔街的人”可能很有吸引力，但简单的事实是，自2019年以来，黑莓和柯达都没有赚取任何利润——游戏驿站自2018年以来就没有盈利。</blockquote></p><p> \"I never like investing where there isn't fundamentals behind it,\" Johnson told Yahoo! Finance Wednesday. While it's certainly true that a lucky few traders could make -- indeed, have made -- money trying to time the market on meme stocks, there's no underlying value to the companies behind the stock tickers -- no profits. That means, the moment sentiment turns against them, there's literally nothing left to prop up the stock price.</p><p><blockquote>“我从来不喜欢在没有基本面的情况下进行投资，”约翰逊告诉雅虎！财经周三。虽然少数幸运的交易者确实可以——事实上已经——通过尝试在模因股票上把握市场时机来赚钱，但股票代码背后的公司没有潜在价值——没有利润。这意味着，一旦情绪对他们不利，就没有什么可以支撑股价了。</blockquote></p><p> Johnson just thinks that's a bad way to invest, andI cannot disagree.</p><p><blockquote>约翰逊只是认为这是一种糟糕的投资方式，我不能不同意。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/15/why-blackberry-and-other-meme-stocks-got-destroyed/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","BB":"黑莓","KODK":"柯达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/15/why-blackberry-and-other-meme-stocks-got-destroyed/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130012448","content_text":"What happened\nIt's been a bad week for \"meme stock\" investors so far, aspredictions of doommounted for stocks with bad business prospects and no profits to fall back on.\nMeme stocks' bad news actually began a week ago, when investment bank Goldman Sachs observed that retail investors' willingness to risk their moneybetting on short squeezes-- that might or might not happen -- was waning. In the second quarter, warned the banker, trading volumes at retail brokerages showed as much as a 30% sequential decline in meme stock buying. And of course, it's hard to create a short squeeze without buyers.\nResult: Meme stocks took a tumble, with Eastman Kodak(NYSE:KODK)closing Thursday down 8.5% from Friday's close,BlackBerry Limited(NYSE:BB)losing 10.4%, and GameStop(NYSE:GME)crashing to a 12.8% loss.\nSo what\nOnly in one instance was there actual news to explain the declines. In fact, more than half of GameStop's losses for the week came on just one trading day -- Wednesday -- when Bloomberg reported that Netflix is eying an entryinto the video game space, in which it will de facto compete with GameStop.\nAs for the other companies, though -- and as for meme stocks in general--it's primarily a shift in sentiment against the companies that's weighing on their stock prices. Following up on Goldman's negative take, Franklin Resources CEO Jenny Johnson chimed in on Wednesday with a warning that traders \"could lose everything\" if they persist in buying meme stocks.\nNow what\nAttractive as it might be to think you're \"sticking it to the man\" on Wall Street by buying stocks that \"hedge funds\" are shorting, the simple truth is that neither BlackBerry nor Kodak has earned any profit whatsoever since 2019 -- and GameStop hasn't earned a profit since 2018.\n\"I never like investing where there isn't fundamentals behind it,\" Johnson told Yahoo! Finance Wednesday. While it's certainly true that a lucky few traders could make -- indeed, have made -- money trying to time the market on meme stocks, there's no underlying value to the companies behind the stock tickers -- no profits. That means, the moment sentiment turns against them, there's literally nothing left to prop up the stock price.\nJohnson just thinks that's a bad way to invest, andI cannot disagree.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"KODK":0.9,"GME":0.9,"BB":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2947,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146807544,"gmtCreate":1626063580388,"gmtModify":1631892902971,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"hi","listText":"hi","text":"hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/146807544","repostId":"1114863871","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2144,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":141691327,"gmtCreate":1625855319569,"gmtModify":1631892902968,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/141691327","repostId":"1155625151","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2366,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143028389,"gmtCreate":1625753128041,"gmtModify":1631892902971,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/143028389","repostId":"1162204971","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3513,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140402559,"gmtCreate":1625667789071,"gmtModify":1631892902973,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice","listText":"nice","text":"nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140402559","repostId":"1187131398","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2145,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":157616047,"gmtCreate":1625580130889,"gmtModify":1633939418104,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/157616047","repostId":"1189769697","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189769697","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625579734,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1189769697?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-06 21:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nvidia Gains on Another Analyst Price-Target Boost<blockquote>英伟达因分析师再次上调目标价而上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189769697","media":"Thestreet","summary":"Nvidia  shares gained on Tuesday after another Wall Street analyst lifted his price target to near $1,000 amid expectations of continued strong demand for video graphics cards and related semiconductors that are used for both gaming and mining cryptocurrencies.Keybanc analyst John Vinh lifted his one-year price target on Nvidia to $950 from $775, following in the footsteps of BMO Capital Markets analyst Ambrish Srivastava, who just last Thursdaylifted his own price target on the chip titanto a W","content":"<p>Nvidia&nbsp;(<b>NVDA</b>)&nbsp;shares gained on Tuesday after another Wall Street analyst lifted his price target to near $1,000 amid expectations of continued strong demand for video graphics cards and related semiconductors that are used for both gaming and mining cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达(<b>NVDA</b>）周二，另一位华尔街分析师将目标价上调至近1,000美元，原因是预计对用于游戏和挖掘加密货币的视频显卡和相关半导体的需求将持续强劲，股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Keybanc analyst John Vinh lifted his one-year price target on Nvidia to $950 from $775, following in the footsteps of BMO Capital Markets analyst Ambrish Srivastava, who just last Thursdaylifted his own price target on the chip titanto a Wall Street high of $1,000 from $975 and affirmed an outperform rating.</p><p><blockquote>Keybanc分析师John Vinh将Nvidia的一年目标价从775美元上调至950美元，紧随BMO资本市场分析师Ambrish Srivastava的脚步，后者上周四将芯片titanto的目标价从华尔街高点1,000美元上调至975美元，并确认跑赢大盘评级。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have piled on the praise for Nvidia since the company’s first-quarter results,which came in better than expected&nbsp;amid strength in so-called hyperscale data center demand, which includes demand for its graphics cards and chips using for both gaming and crypto mining.</p><p><blockquote>自英伟达公布第一季度业绩以来，分析师对该公司赞不绝口，由于所谓的超大规模数据中心需求强劲，该公司的业绩好于预期，其中包括对用于游戏和加密货币挖矿的显卡和芯片的需求。</blockquote></p><p> Even before then, analysts were&nbsp;touting Nvidia’s performance&nbsp;amid strong demand for its gaming graphics cards, which surged through the pandemic and stay-at-home orders that boosted demand for at-home entertainment like video games, compounded by the ongoing chip shortage that has boosted demand - and prices -for the chips and the cards themselves.</p><p><blockquote>甚至在此之前，分析师就在对英伟达游戏显卡的强劲需求中吹捧英伟达的业绩，该显卡在大流行期间激增，而居家订单提振了对视频游戏等家庭娱乐的需求，而持续的芯片短缺又加剧了这种情况。增加了芯片和卡本身的需求和价格。</blockquote></p><p> At the same time, surging prices for Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies this year also have fueled demand. Crypto miners use graphics processing units, or GPUs, to mine currencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Nvidia’slatest RTX 30 series, launched last year, has proven particularly popular with miners.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，今年比特币、以太币和其他加密货币的价格飙升也刺激了需求。加密货币矿工使用图形处理单元（GPU）来挖掘比特币和以太币等货币。事实证明，英伟达去年推出的最新RTX 30系列特别受矿工欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> TheStreet's&nbsp;Jim Cramerin his&nbsp;Real Money&nbsp;column on Tuesdaynoted another reason to be bullish on Nvidia: a potential acquisition that will beef up its business even more.</p><p><blockquote>《华尔街日报》的吉姆·克莱默(Jim Cramerer)在周二的《真钱》专栏中指出了看好英伟达的另一个原因：一项潜在的收购将进一步增强其业务。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, Jim pointed to the increasing likelihood that regulators will allow the company to buy Arm Holdings, a British company that excels in cellphones and personal computers, which will add to its already strong sales pipeline that has been driven by far more than just demand from Ethereum miners.</p><p><blockquote>具体来说，吉姆指出，监管机构允许该公司收购Arm Holdings的可能性越来越大，Arm Holdings是一家擅长手机和个人电脑的英国公司，这将增加其本已强劲的销售渠道，而该渠道的推动因素不仅仅是来自以太币矿工的需求。</blockquote></p><p> \"I'm sure some of you might think that Nvidia is more of an Ethereum play, because its cards are used to mine the cryptocurrency,\" Cramer wrote. \"In reality, that's a tiny portion of their business and is made up of cards that aren't up to specification for gaming, scrap if you will.\"</p><p><blockquote>克莱默写道：“我相信你们中的一些人可能会认为英伟达更像是一家以太币公司，因为它的卡是用来挖掘加密货币的。”“事实上，这只是他们业务的一小部分，而且由不符合游戏规格的卡组成，如果你愿意的话，可以报废。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nvidia Gains on Another Analyst Price-Target Boost<blockquote>英伟达因分析师再次上调目标价而上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNvidia Gains on Another Analyst Price-Target Boost<blockquote>英伟达因分析师再次上调目标价而上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-06 21:55</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Nvidia&nbsp;(<b>NVDA</b>)&nbsp;shares gained on Tuesday after another Wall Street analyst lifted his price target to near $1,000 amid expectations of continued strong demand for video graphics cards and related semiconductors that are used for both gaming and mining cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达(<b>NVDA</b>）周二，另一位华尔街分析师将目标价上调至近1,000美元，原因是预计对用于游戏和挖掘加密货币的视频显卡和相关半导体的需求将持续强劲，股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Keybanc analyst John Vinh lifted his one-year price target on Nvidia to $950 from $775, following in the footsteps of BMO Capital Markets analyst Ambrish Srivastava, who just last Thursdaylifted his own price target on the chip titanto a Wall Street high of $1,000 from $975 and affirmed an outperform rating.</p><p><blockquote>Keybanc分析师John Vinh将Nvidia的一年目标价从775美元上调至950美元，紧随BMO资本市场分析师Ambrish Srivastava的脚步，后者上周四将芯片titanto的目标价从华尔街高点1,000美元上调至975美元，并确认跑赢大盘评级。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have piled on the praise for Nvidia since the company’s first-quarter results,which came in better than expected&nbsp;amid strength in so-called hyperscale data center demand, which includes demand for its graphics cards and chips using for both gaming and crypto mining.</p><p><blockquote>自英伟达公布第一季度业绩以来，分析师对该公司赞不绝口，由于所谓的超大规模数据中心需求强劲，该公司的业绩好于预期，其中包括对用于游戏和加密货币挖矿的显卡和芯片的需求。</blockquote></p><p> Even before then, analysts were&nbsp;touting Nvidia’s performance&nbsp;amid strong demand for its gaming graphics cards, which surged through the pandemic and stay-at-home orders that boosted demand for at-home entertainment like video games, compounded by the ongoing chip shortage that has boosted demand - and prices -for the chips and the cards themselves.</p><p><blockquote>甚至在此之前，分析师就在对英伟达游戏显卡的强劲需求中吹捧英伟达的业绩，该显卡在大流行期间激增，而居家订单提振了对视频游戏等家庭娱乐的需求，而持续的芯片短缺又加剧了这种情况。增加了芯片和卡本身的需求和价格。</blockquote></p><p> At the same time, surging prices for Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies this year also have fueled demand. Crypto miners use graphics processing units, or GPUs, to mine currencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Nvidia’slatest RTX 30 series, launched last year, has proven particularly popular with miners.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，今年比特币、以太币和其他加密货币的价格飙升也刺激了需求。加密货币矿工使用图形处理单元（GPU）来挖掘比特币和以太币等货币。事实证明，英伟达去年推出的最新RTX 30系列特别受矿工欢迎。</blockquote></p><p> TheStreet's&nbsp;Jim Cramerin his&nbsp;Real Money&nbsp;column on Tuesdaynoted another reason to be bullish on Nvidia: a potential acquisition that will beef up its business even more.</p><p><blockquote>《华尔街日报》的吉姆·克莱默(Jim Cramerer)在周二的《真钱》专栏中指出了看好英伟达的另一个原因：一项潜在的收购将进一步增强其业务。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, Jim pointed to the increasing likelihood that regulators will allow the company to buy Arm Holdings, a British company that excels in cellphones and personal computers, which will add to its already strong sales pipeline that has been driven by far more than just demand from Ethereum miners.</p><p><blockquote>具体来说，吉姆指出，监管机构允许该公司收购Arm Holdings的可能性越来越大，Arm Holdings是一家擅长手机和个人电脑的英国公司，这将增加其本已强劲的销售渠道，而该渠道的推动因素不仅仅是来自以太币矿工的需求。</blockquote></p><p> \"I'm sure some of you might think that Nvidia is more of an Ethereum play, because its cards are used to mine the cryptocurrency,\" Cramer wrote. \"In reality, that's a tiny portion of their business and is made up of cards that aren't up to specification for gaming, scrap if you will.\"</p><p><blockquote>克莱默写道：“我相信你们中的一些人可能会认为英伟达更像是一家以太币公司，因为它的卡是用来挖掘加密货币的。”“事实上，这只是他们业务的一小部分，而且由不符合游戏规格的卡组成，如果你愿意的话，可以报废。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/nvidia-nvda-keybanc-price-target-boost-070621\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/nvidia-nvda-keybanc-price-target-boost-070621","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189769697","content_text":"Nvidia (NVDA) shares gained on Tuesday after another Wall Street analyst lifted his price target to near $1,000 amid expectations of continued strong demand for video graphics cards and related semiconductors that are used for both gaming and mining cryptocurrencies.\nKeybanc analyst John Vinh lifted his one-year price target on Nvidia to $950 from $775, following in the footsteps of BMO Capital Markets analyst Ambrish Srivastava, who just last Thursdaylifted his own price target on the chip titanto a Wall Street high of $1,000 from $975 and affirmed an outperform rating.\nAnalysts have piled on the praise for Nvidia since the company’s first-quarter results,which came in better than expected amid strength in so-called hyperscale data center demand, which includes demand for its graphics cards and chips using for both gaming and crypto mining.\nEven before then, analysts were touting Nvidia’s performance amid strong demand for its gaming graphics cards, which surged through the pandemic and stay-at-home orders that boosted demand for at-home entertainment like video games, compounded by the ongoing chip shortage that has boosted demand - and prices -for the chips and the cards themselves.\nAt the same time, surging prices for Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies this year also have fueled demand. Crypto miners use graphics processing units, or GPUs, to mine currencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Nvidia’slatest RTX 30 series, launched last year, has proven particularly popular with miners.\nTheStreet's Jim Cramerin his Real Money column on Tuesdaynoted another reason to be bullish on Nvidia: a potential acquisition that will beef up its business even more.\nSpecifically, Jim pointed to the increasing likelihood that regulators will allow the company to buy Arm Holdings, a British company that excels in cellphones and personal computers, which will add to its already strong sales pipeline that has been driven by far more than just demand from Ethereum miners.\n\"I'm sure some of you might think that Nvidia is more of an Ethereum play, because its cards are used to mine the cryptocurrency,\" Cramer wrote. \"In reality, that's a tiny portion of their business and is made up of cards that aren't up to specification for gaming, scrap if you will.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":602,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154041126,"gmtCreate":1625463310165,"gmtModify":1633940426146,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"hi","listText":"hi","text":"hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/154041126","repostId":"1193340451","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":689,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":156211275,"gmtCreate":1625224480797,"gmtModify":1633942383375,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/156211275","repostId":"1126312436","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126312436","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625212145,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126312436?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-02 15:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Stock Market Had a Great First Half. 3 Things That Could Cause it to Crash.<blockquote>股市上半年表现出色。可能导致它崩溃的三件事。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126312436","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stocks have soared relentlessly this year. Several factors, however, have the potential to end the p","content":"<p>Stocks have soared relentlessly this year. Several factors, however, have the potential to end the party.</p><p><blockquote>今年股市无情飙升。然而，有几个因素有可能终结这场派对。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 has had its second-best first half of a year since 1998, and it hasn’t shown many signs of letting up. The index ended June up 14.4% year to date, hitting several records during the month and posting another record close on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>标普500上半年的表现是自1998年以来第二好的，而且没有表现出太多放缓的迹象。截至6月底，该指数今年迄今已上涨14.4%，当月创下多项纪录，并于周四创下另一项收盘纪录。</blockquote></p><p> Yet there are a couple key risks that could turn all of that around, according to Nick Colas, co-founder of DataTrek.</p><p><blockquote>然而，DataTrek联合创始人尼克·科拉斯(Nick Colas)表示，有几个关键风险可能会扭转这一切。</blockquote></p><p> First, there’s the possibility of an oil price shock, as the price of crude has shown little sign of cooling off. WTI crude oil is up 56% year to date and notched a&nbsp;new multi-year high&nbsp;Thursday—even amid growing&nbsp;expectations that OPEC will increase supply. If oil prices run hot enough, that could raise inflation to a level that—if sustained — could cause consumer demand to fall and that could surpass Federal Reserve expectations.</p><p><blockquote>首先，油价可能会出现冲击，因为原油价格几乎没有降温的迹象。WTI原油今年迄今已上涨56%，并于周四创下多年新高——尽管人们越来越预期OPEC将增加供应。如果油价足够高，通胀可能会上升到一个水平，如果持续下去，可能会导致消费者需求下降，并可能超出美联储的预期。</blockquote></p><p> “Suddenly higher oil prices” is atop the list of stock market concerns for Colas. “Rapidly rising oil prices will cause U.S. inflation to overshoot the Fed’s desired outcome and also stress the American consumer.”</p><p><blockquote>“油价突然上涨”是Colas股市担忧的首要问题。“油价快速上涨将导致美国通胀超出美联储预期结果，也给美国消费者带来压力。”</blockquote></p><p> Both those things could dent the stock market, which has long benefited from the Fed’s accommodative monetary policy, especially if the Fed signals that interest-rate increases could come sooner than expected.</p><p><blockquote>这两件事都可能削弱股市，股市长期以来一直受益于美联储的宽松货币政策，特别是如果美联储暗示加息可能比预期更早到来的话。</blockquote></p><p> That means the Fed will need to tread carefully when discussing rates to avoid spooking the market, Colas says.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯表示，这意味着美联储在讨论利率时需要谨慎行事，以避免惊吓市场。</blockquote></p><p> “Federal Reserve miscommunication about upcoming policy changes and/or raising interest rates too aggressively” is a second risk, Colas says. For instance, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;dived 18% over roughly three months in late 2018 as the Fed raised rates, despite the market’s hope at that time for rates to stay put.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯表示，“美联储对即将到来的政策变化和/或过于激进地加息的沟通不畅”是第二个风险。例如，2018年底，随着美联储加息，标普500在大约三个月内暴跌18%，尽管当时市场希望利率保持不变。</blockquote></p><p> Peaking earnings growth is the other threat to stocks, Colas says. Earnings growth for the average S&amp;P 500 company is expected slow down to 11% in 2022 from 36% in 2021, according to FactSet, as the economy normalizes and the postpandemic recovery eases. But on average, S&amp;P 500 stocks trade at 21.5 times expected earnings for the next 12 months, still above the index’s pre-pandemic multiple. At some point, stocks valuations will need to better reflect the expected decline in earnings growth, which would mean falling stock prices.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯表示，盈利增长见顶是股市面临的另一个威胁。FactSet的数据显示，随着经济正常化和疫情后复苏放缓，标普500公司的平均盈利增长预计将从2021年的36%放缓至2022年的11%。但平均而言，标普500股市未来12个月预期市盈率为21.5倍，仍高于该指数大流行前的市盈率。在某些时候，股票估值需要更好地反映盈利增长的预期下降，这将意味着股价下跌。</blockquote></p><p> “Valuations are high enough currently that peaking earnings could be a larger risk than before,” Colas writes.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯写道：“目前估值足够高，盈利见顶可能比以前面临更大的风险。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Stock Market Had a Great First Half. 3 Things That Could Cause it to Crash.<blockquote>股市上半年表现出色。可能导致它崩溃的三件事。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Stock Market Had a Great First Half. 3 Things That Could Cause it to Crash.<blockquote>股市上半年表现出色。可能导致它崩溃的三件事。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-02 15:49</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stocks have soared relentlessly this year. Several factors, however, have the potential to end the party.</p><p><blockquote>今年股市无情飙升。然而，有几个因素有可能终结这场派对。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 has had its second-best first half of a year since 1998, and it hasn’t shown many signs of letting up. The index ended June up 14.4% year to date, hitting several records during the month and posting another record close on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>标普500上半年的表现是自1998年以来第二好的，而且没有表现出太多放缓的迹象。截至6月底，该指数今年迄今已上涨14.4%，当月创下多项纪录，并于周四创下另一项收盘纪录。</blockquote></p><p> Yet there are a couple key risks that could turn all of that around, according to Nick Colas, co-founder of DataTrek.</p><p><blockquote>然而，DataTrek联合创始人尼克·科拉斯(Nick Colas)表示，有几个关键风险可能会扭转这一切。</blockquote></p><p> First, there’s the possibility of an oil price shock, as the price of crude has shown little sign of cooling off. WTI crude oil is up 56% year to date and notched a&nbsp;new multi-year high&nbsp;Thursday—even amid growing&nbsp;expectations that OPEC will increase supply. If oil prices run hot enough, that could raise inflation to a level that—if sustained — could cause consumer demand to fall and that could surpass Federal Reserve expectations.</p><p><blockquote>首先，油价可能会出现冲击，因为原油价格几乎没有降温的迹象。WTI原油今年迄今已上涨56%，并于周四创下多年新高——尽管人们越来越预期OPEC将增加供应。如果油价足够高，通胀可能会上升到一个水平，如果持续下去，可能会导致消费者需求下降，并可能超出美联储的预期。</blockquote></p><p> “Suddenly higher oil prices” is atop the list of stock market concerns for Colas. “Rapidly rising oil prices will cause U.S. inflation to overshoot the Fed’s desired outcome and also stress the American consumer.”</p><p><blockquote>“油价突然上涨”是Colas股市担忧的首要问题。“油价快速上涨将导致美国通胀超出美联储预期结果，也给美国消费者带来压力。”</blockquote></p><p> Both those things could dent the stock market, which has long benefited from the Fed’s accommodative monetary policy, especially if the Fed signals that interest-rate increases could come sooner than expected.</p><p><blockquote>这两件事都可能削弱股市，股市长期以来一直受益于美联储的宽松货币政策，特别是如果美联储暗示加息可能比预期更早到来的话。</blockquote></p><p> That means the Fed will need to tread carefully when discussing rates to avoid spooking the market, Colas says.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯表示，这意味着美联储在讨论利率时需要谨慎行事，以避免惊吓市场。</blockquote></p><p> “Federal Reserve miscommunication about upcoming policy changes and/or raising interest rates too aggressively” is a second risk, Colas says. For instance, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;dived 18% over roughly three months in late 2018 as the Fed raised rates, despite the market’s hope at that time for rates to stay put.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯表示，“美联储对即将到来的政策变化和/或过于激进地加息的沟通不畅”是第二个风险。例如，2018年底，随着美联储加息，标普500在大约三个月内暴跌18%，尽管当时市场希望利率保持不变。</blockquote></p><p> Peaking earnings growth is the other threat to stocks, Colas says. Earnings growth for the average S&amp;P 500 company is expected slow down to 11% in 2022 from 36% in 2021, according to FactSet, as the economy normalizes and the postpandemic recovery eases. But on average, S&amp;P 500 stocks trade at 21.5 times expected earnings for the next 12 months, still above the index’s pre-pandemic multiple. At some point, stocks valuations will need to better reflect the expected decline in earnings growth, which would mean falling stock prices.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯表示，盈利增长见顶是股市面临的另一个威胁。FactSet的数据显示，随着经济正常化和疫情后复苏放缓，标普500公司的平均盈利增长预计将从2021年的36%放缓至2022年的11%。但平均而言，标普500股市未来12个月预期市盈率为21.5倍，仍高于该指数大流行前的市盈率。在某些时候，股票估值需要更好地反映盈利增长的预期下降，这将意味着股价下跌。</blockquote></p><p> “Valuations are high enough currently that peaking earnings could be a larger risk than before,” Colas writes.</p><p><blockquote>科拉斯写道：“目前估值足够高，盈利见顶可能比以前面临更大的风险。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-crash-risks-51625174065\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-crash-risks-51625174065","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126312436","content_text":"Stocks have soared relentlessly this year. Several factors, however, have the potential to end the party.\nThe S&P 500 has had its second-best first half of a year since 1998, and it hasn’t shown many signs of letting up. The index ended June up 14.4% year to date, hitting several records during the month and posting another record close on Thursday.\nYet there are a couple key risks that could turn all of that around, according to Nick Colas, co-founder of DataTrek.\nFirst, there’s the possibility of an oil price shock, as the price of crude has shown little sign of cooling off. WTI crude oil is up 56% year to date and notched a new multi-year high Thursday—even amid growing expectations that OPEC will increase supply. If oil prices run hot enough, that could raise inflation to a level that—if sustained — could cause consumer demand to fall and that could surpass Federal Reserve expectations.\n“Suddenly higher oil prices” is atop the list of stock market concerns for Colas. “Rapidly rising oil prices will cause U.S. inflation to overshoot the Fed’s desired outcome and also stress the American consumer.”\nBoth those things could dent the stock market, which has long benefited from the Fed’s accommodative monetary policy, especially if the Fed signals that interest-rate increases could come sooner than expected.\nThat means the Fed will need to tread carefully when discussing rates to avoid spooking the market, Colas says.\n“Federal Reserve miscommunication about upcoming policy changes and/or raising interest rates too aggressively” is a second risk, Colas says. For instance, the S&P 500 dived 18% over roughly three months in late 2018 as the Fed raised rates, despite the market’s hope at that time for rates to stay put.\nPeaking earnings growth is the other threat to stocks, Colas says. Earnings growth for the average S&P 500 company is expected slow down to 11% in 2022 from 36% in 2021, according to FactSet, as the economy normalizes and the postpandemic recovery eases. But on average, S&P 500 stocks trade at 21.5 times expected earnings for the next 12 months, still above the index’s pre-pandemic multiple. At some point, stocks valuations will need to better reflect the expected decline in earnings growth, which would mean falling stock prices.\n“Valuations are high enough currently that peaking earnings could be a larger risk than before,” Colas writes.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":822,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":158180415,"gmtCreate":1625136569237,"gmtModify":1633944410233,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"hi","listText":"hi","text":"hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/158180415","repostId":"1106223449","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106223449","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625122086,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106223449?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-01 14:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The S&P 500 Notches Its Second-Best First Half Since the Dot-Com Bubble. What Comes Next.<blockquote>标普500取得了自互联网泡沫以来第二好的上半年成绩。接下来会发生什么。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106223449","media":"Barrons","summary":"Since 1979, the S&P 500 has gained 10% or more 14 times during the first half of the year.\nThe S&P 5","content":"<p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d70d0323609e9ce596a9a90e475422d1\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Since 1979, the S&amp;P 500 has gained 10% or more 14 times during the first half of the year.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>自1979年以来，标普500上半年涨幅达到或超过10%已有14次。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 closed its second-best first half since the dot-com bubble. Don’t be surprised if the stock market keeps on rising.</p><p><blockquote>标普500的上半年表现是自互联网泡沫以来第二好的。如果股市持续上涨，不要感到惊讶。</blockquote></p><p> With June coming to an end, the S&amp;P 500 finished the first half of 2021 with a gain of 14.4%. Since 1998, only 2019’s 17.4% first-half surge has been larger.</p><p><blockquote>随着6月接近尾声，标普500以14.4%的涨幅结束了2021年上半年。自1998年以来，只有2019年上半年17.4%的增幅更大。</blockquote></p><p> The market got a boost from Covid-19 vaccinations, which have helped the U.S. economy reopen, while trillions of dollars of fiscal stimulus have helped shore up demand. The gains continued even as concerns about inflation have increased speculation that the Federal Reserve would be forced to take steps to slow the economy.</p><p><blockquote>Covid-19疫苗接种提振了市场，帮助美国经济重新开放，而数万亿美元的财政刺激措施帮助支撑了需求。尽管对通胀的担忧加剧了人们对美联储将被迫采取措施减缓经济增长的猜测，但涨幅仍在继续。</blockquote></p><p> The combination of big gains and a more hawkish Fed have raised concerns that the market has become too complacent. If inflation continues to run hot for long enough, the central bank could be forced to act more quickly than the market expects—and&nbsp;cause stocks to tumble. Others worry that&nbsp;U.S. economic growth could slow faster than investors anticipate, causing a pullback in the process.</p><p><blockquote>大幅上涨和美联储更加鹰派的结合引发了市场过于自满的担忧。如果通胀持续持续足够长的时间，央行可能会被迫以比市场预期更快的速度采取行动，并导致股市暴跌。其他人担心美国。经济增长放缓的速度可能快于投资者的预期，导致经济增长放缓。</blockquote></p><p> For those who take that view, there is no better time to back away from the stock market than the present. History suggests otherwise.</p><p><blockquote>对于持这种观点的人来说，没有比现在更好的退出股市的时机了。历史表明并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> Since 1979, the S&amp;P 500 has gained 10% or more 14 times during the first half of the year, and the index has gone on to average a 6.3% gain over the second half of the year. What’s more, the index finished the second half of the year higher In 11 of those instances, or 79% of the time.</p><p><blockquote>自1979年以来，标普500上半年涨幅达到或超过10%的有14次，下半年该指数平均涨幅为6.3%。更重要的是，该指数在下半年有11次（即79%的时间）走高。</blockquote></p><p> Even the losses, when they occurred, weren’t all that bad. The S&amp;P 500 dropped 1.9% in the second half of 1983 and 3.5% during the last six months of 1986.</p><p><blockquote>即使是损失，当它们发生时，也没有那么糟糕。标普500在1983年下半年下降了1.9%，在1986年最后六个月下降了3.5%。</blockquote></p><p> The one exception was the last six months of 1987 when the index fell 19% during the second half of the year. That period included Black Monday, when the S&amp;P 500 dropped 20% in one day, still a record loss. While selling linked to so-called&nbsp;portfolio insurance&nbsp;was ultimately blamed for the size and speed of the loss, the second half of 1987 was&nbsp;a period of rising bond yields and high stock-market valuations, just like the first half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>一个例外是1987年的最后六个月，该指数在下半年下跌了19%。那段时间包括黑色星期一，当时标普500在一天内下跌了20%，仍然是创纪录的跌幅。虽然与所谓投资组合保险相关的抛售最终被归咎于损失的规模和速度，但1987年下半年是债券收益率上升和股市估值高的时期，就像2021年上半年一样。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the market has been acting like it wants to go higher, not lower. Pullbacks, a normal event in the midst of bull runs, have been mild in 2021, with the largest drops being less than 4%. “What the [S&amp;P 500] has done throughout 2021 is pick itself up when and where it has needed to, maintaining an uptrend all along,” writes Frank&nbsp;Cappelleri, chief market technician at Instinet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，市场一直表现得想要走高，而不是走低。回调是牛市中的正常事件，在2021年表现温和，最大跌幅不到4%。Instinet首席市场技术员Frank Cappelleri写道：“[标普500]在2021年所做的就是在需要的时间和地点回升，始终保持上升趋势。”</blockquote></p><p> That 6.3% average second-half rise would push the S&amp;P 500’s full-year gain to around 23%. That would represent a “textbook [market] recovery” from a recession, says Fundstrat’s Tom Lee.</p><p><blockquote>下半年6.3%的平均涨幅将使标普500的全年涨幅达到23%左右。Fundstrat的汤姆·李(Tom Lee)表示，这将代表着从衰退中“教科书式的[市场]复苏”。</blockquote></p><p> For now, at least, the path of least resistance is higher.</p><p><blockquote>至少就目前而言，阻力最小的路径更高。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3cb229b2e05d59b9c126d464a7d771bb\" tg-width=\"958\" tg-height=\"647\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The S&P 500 Notches Its Second-Best First Half Since the Dot-Com Bubble. What Comes Next.<blockquote>标普500取得了自互联网泡沫以来第二好的上半年成绩。接下来会发生什么。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe S&P 500 Notches Its Second-Best First Half Since the Dot-Com Bubble. What Comes Next.<blockquote>标普500取得了自互联网泡沫以来第二好的上半年成绩。接下来会发生什么。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-01 14:48</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d70d0323609e9ce596a9a90e475422d1\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Since 1979, the S&amp;P 500 has gained 10% or more 14 times during the first half of the year.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>自1979年以来，标普500上半年涨幅达到或超过10%已有14次。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 closed its second-best first half since the dot-com bubble. Don’t be surprised if the stock market keeps on rising.</p><p><blockquote>标普500的上半年表现是自互联网泡沫以来第二好的。如果股市持续上涨，不要感到惊讶。</blockquote></p><p> With June coming to an end, the S&amp;P 500 finished the first half of 2021 with a gain of 14.4%. Since 1998, only 2019’s 17.4% first-half surge has been larger.</p><p><blockquote>随着6月接近尾声，标普500以14.4%的涨幅结束了2021年上半年。自1998年以来，只有2019年上半年17.4%的增幅更大。</blockquote></p><p> The market got a boost from Covid-19 vaccinations, which have helped the U.S. economy reopen, while trillions of dollars of fiscal stimulus have helped shore up demand. The gains continued even as concerns about inflation have increased speculation that the Federal Reserve would be forced to take steps to slow the economy.</p><p><blockquote>Covid-19疫苗接种提振了市场，帮助美国经济重新开放，而数万亿美元的财政刺激措施帮助支撑了需求。尽管对通胀的担忧加剧了人们对美联储将被迫采取措施减缓经济增长的猜测，但涨幅仍在继续。</blockquote></p><p> The combination of big gains and a more hawkish Fed have raised concerns that the market has become too complacent. If inflation continues to run hot for long enough, the central bank could be forced to act more quickly than the market expects—and&nbsp;cause stocks to tumble. Others worry that&nbsp;U.S. economic growth could slow faster than investors anticipate, causing a pullback in the process.</p><p><blockquote>大幅上涨和美联储更加鹰派的结合引发了市场过于自满的担忧。如果通胀持续持续足够长的时间，央行可能会被迫以比市场预期更快的速度采取行动，并导致股市暴跌。其他人担心美国。经济增长放缓的速度可能快于投资者的预期，导致经济增长放缓。</blockquote></p><p> For those who take that view, there is no better time to back away from the stock market than the present. History suggests otherwise.</p><p><blockquote>对于持这种观点的人来说，没有比现在更好的退出股市的时机了。历史表明并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> Since 1979, the S&amp;P 500 has gained 10% or more 14 times during the first half of the year, and the index has gone on to average a 6.3% gain over the second half of the year. What’s more, the index finished the second half of the year higher In 11 of those instances, or 79% of the time.</p><p><blockquote>自1979年以来，标普500上半年涨幅达到或超过10%的有14次，下半年该指数平均涨幅为6.3%。更重要的是，该指数在下半年有11次（即79%的时间）走高。</blockquote></p><p> Even the losses, when they occurred, weren’t all that bad. The S&amp;P 500 dropped 1.9% in the second half of 1983 and 3.5% during the last six months of 1986.</p><p><blockquote>即使是损失，当它们发生时，也没有那么糟糕。标普500在1983年下半年下降了1.9%，在1986年最后六个月下降了3.5%。</blockquote></p><p> The one exception was the last six months of 1987 when the index fell 19% during the second half of the year. That period included Black Monday, when the S&amp;P 500 dropped 20% in one day, still a record loss. While selling linked to so-called&nbsp;portfolio insurance&nbsp;was ultimately blamed for the size and speed of the loss, the second half of 1987 was&nbsp;a period of rising bond yields and high stock-market valuations, just like the first half of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>一个例外是1987年的最后六个月，该指数在下半年下跌了19%。那段时间包括黑色星期一，当时标普500在一天内下跌了20%，仍然是创纪录的跌幅。虽然与所谓投资组合保险相关的抛售最终被归咎于损失的规模和速度，但1987年下半年是债券收益率上升和股市估值高的时期，就像2021年上半年一样。</blockquote></p><p> Still, the market has been acting like it wants to go higher, not lower. Pullbacks, a normal event in the midst of bull runs, have been mild in 2021, with the largest drops being less than 4%. “What the [S&amp;P 500] has done throughout 2021 is pick itself up when and where it has needed to, maintaining an uptrend all along,” writes Frank&nbsp;Cappelleri, chief market technician at Instinet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，市场一直表现得想要走高，而不是走低。回调是牛市中的正常事件，在2021年表现温和，最大跌幅不到4%。Instinet首席市场技术员Frank Cappelleri写道：“[标普500]在2021年所做的就是在需要的时间和地点回升，始终保持上升趋势。”</blockquote></p><p> That 6.3% average second-half rise would push the S&amp;P 500’s full-year gain to around 23%. That would represent a “textbook [market] recovery” from a recession, says Fundstrat’s Tom Lee.</p><p><blockquote>下半年6.3%的平均涨幅将使标普500的全年涨幅达到23%左右。Fundstrat的汤姆·李(Tom Lee)表示，这将代表着从衰退中“教科书式的[市场]复苏”。</blockquote></p><p> For now, at least, the path of least resistance is higher.</p><p><blockquote>至少就目前而言，阻力最小的路径更高。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3cb229b2e05d59b9c126d464a7d771bb\" tg-width=\"958\" tg-height=\"647\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-futures-crash-gains-51625071996?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-futures-crash-gains-51625071996?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106223449","content_text":"Since 1979, the S&P 500 has gained 10% or more 14 times during the first half of the year.\nThe S&P 500 closed its second-best first half since the dot-com bubble. Don’t be surprised if the stock market keeps on rising.\nWith June coming to an end, the S&P 500 finished the first half of 2021 with a gain of 14.4%. Since 1998, only 2019’s 17.4% first-half surge has been larger.\nThe market got a boost from Covid-19 vaccinations, which have helped the U.S. economy reopen, while trillions of dollars of fiscal stimulus have helped shore up demand. The gains continued even as concerns about inflation have increased speculation that the Federal Reserve would be forced to take steps to slow the economy.\nThe combination of big gains and a more hawkish Fed have raised concerns that the market has become too complacent. If inflation continues to run hot for long enough, the central bank could be forced to act more quickly than the market expects—and cause stocks to tumble. Others worry that U.S. economic growth could slow faster than investors anticipate, causing a pullback in the process.\nFor those who take that view, there is no better time to back away from the stock market than the present. History suggests otherwise.\nSince 1979, the S&P 500 has gained 10% or more 14 times during the first half of the year, and the index has gone on to average a 6.3% gain over the second half of the year. What’s more, the index finished the second half of the year higher In 11 of those instances, or 79% of the time.\nEven the losses, when they occurred, weren’t all that bad. The S&P 500 dropped 1.9% in the second half of 1983 and 3.5% during the last six months of 1986.\nThe one exception was the last six months of 1987 when the index fell 19% during the second half of the year. That period included Black Monday, when the S&P 500 dropped 20% in one day, still a record loss. While selling linked to so-called portfolio insurance was ultimately blamed for the size and speed of the loss, the second half of 1987 was a period of rising bond yields and high stock-market valuations, just like the first half of 2021.\nStill, the market has been acting like it wants to go higher, not lower. Pullbacks, a normal event in the midst of bull runs, have been mild in 2021, with the largest drops being less than 4%. “What the [S&P 500] has done throughout 2021 is pick itself up when and where it has needed to, maintaining an uptrend all along,” writes Frank Cappelleri, chief market technician at Instinet.\nThat 6.3% average second-half rise would push the S&P 500’s full-year gain to around 23%. That would represent a “textbook [market] recovery” from a recession, says Fundstrat’s Tom Lee.\nFor now, at least, the path of least resistance is higher.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":844,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159282029,"gmtCreate":1624970249361,"gmtModify":1633946411628,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/159282029","repostId":"1128482198","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":770,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":124070471,"gmtCreate":1624713289893,"gmtModify":1633949362475,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"hi","listText":"hi","text":"hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/124070471","repostId":"1164137597","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":551,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":122207947,"gmtCreate":1624621068489,"gmtModify":1633950455567,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/122207947","repostId":"2146023165","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1000,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126035903,"gmtCreate":1624536917902,"gmtModify":1634004748650,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/126035903","repostId":"1195543409","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":936,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":123878816,"gmtCreate":1624418376635,"gmtModify":1634006388353,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice","listText":"nice","text":"nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/123878816","repostId":"2145664330","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":800,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":129381849,"gmtCreate":1624359451581,"gmtModify":1634007336243,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/129381849","repostId":"2145569410","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":725,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":136346551,"gmtCreate":1621996179473,"gmtModify":1634184842632,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/136346551","repostId":"2138196079","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185226145,"gmtCreate":1623655158087,"gmtModify":1634030585123,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185226145","repostId":"1165811803","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":722,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":117474013,"gmtCreate":1623159623932,"gmtModify":1631884121059,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LKCO\">$Luokung Technology Corp(LKCO)$</a>what’s behind the rise?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LKCO\">$Luokung Technology Corp(LKCO)$</a>what’s behind the rise?","text":"$Luokung Technology Corp(LKCO)$what’s behind the rise?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117474013","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3168,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":181112018,"gmtCreate":1623378180534,"gmtModify":1634033992526,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment&nbsp;","listText":"comment&nbsp;","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/181112018","repostId":"1184070773","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":525,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810514615,"gmtCreate":1629986424937,"gmtModify":1704954204057,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":".","listText":".","text":".","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/810514615","repostId":"1100464351","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2233,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355937237,"gmtCreate":1617023079129,"gmtModify":1634523092028,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like&nbsp;comment","listText":"like&nbsp;comment","text":"like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355937237","repostId":"1194994971","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":886777088,"gmtCreate":1631628602144,"gmtModify":1631892902949,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/886777088","repostId":"1155175288","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1155175288","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1631627144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1155175288?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-14 21:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV stocks rose in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155175288","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto climbed between 0.7% and 2%.Whi","content":"<p>EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto&nbsp;climbed between 0.7% and 2%.While&nbsp;Lucid Group fell nearly 4%&nbsp;as&nbsp;an equity research analyst at Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of the company at underweight.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨。特斯拉、蔚来、小鹏汽车和理想汽车上涨0.7%至2%。而Lucid Group则下跌近4%，摩根士丹利股票研究分析师在跑输大盘开始对该公司进行报道。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df9a72b93885e07dad67e2dc86b0156a\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"483\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV stocks rose in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV stocks rose in morning trading<blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-09-14 21:45</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto&nbsp;climbed between 0.7% and 2%.While&nbsp;Lucid Group fell nearly 4%&nbsp;as&nbsp;an equity research analyst at Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of the company at underweight.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车股早盘上涨。特斯拉、蔚来、小鹏汽车和理想汽车上涨0.7%至2%。而Lucid Group则下跌近4%，摩根士丹利股票研究分析师在跑输大盘开始对该公司进行报道。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df9a72b93885e07dad67e2dc86b0156a\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"483\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1155175288","content_text":"EV stocks rose in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors and Li Auto climbed between 0.7% and 2%.While Lucid Group fell nearly 4% as an equity research analyst at Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of the company at underweight.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9,"LI":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1858,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":135409742,"gmtCreate":1622173319786,"gmtModify":1634183134259,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/135409742","repostId":"2138177300","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":860,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159282029,"gmtCreate":1624970249361,"gmtModify":1633946411628,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"comment","listText":"comment","text":"comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/159282029","repostId":"1128482198","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":770,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":186915728,"gmtCreate":1623468975264,"gmtModify":1634032736222,"author":{"id":"3577872621107081","authorId":"3577872621107081","name":"Loola","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64940dfb0e60ec6f7fff49d64ddfc53a","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577872621107081","authorIdStr":"3577872621107081"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/186915728","repostId":"2142204074","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":397,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}