+关注
ETF88
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:未知
211
关注
3
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
ETF88
2021-08-21
Pls like my post. Thanks.
Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>
ETF88
2021-08-10
Great news! Pls like my comment Thanks!
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-08-13
Buy when fear! Pls like my post.thank!!
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-08-11
Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-08-11
Amc to the moon pls like my post
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-08-27
Thanks for sharing.
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-08-04
All thanks to FED printers!!![微笑]
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-09-12
Thanks for sharing
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-09-09
Hold on and ride to Moon, will be 3k in years time. Thanks.
抱歉,原内容已删除
ETF88
2021-08-16
Pls like my comment. Thanks!
抱歉,原内容已删除
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577969053537569","uuid":"3577969053537569","gmtCreate":1614994217898,"gmtModify":1617947836504,"name":"ETF88","pinyin":"etf88","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":211,"tweetSize":29,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.74%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":888330159,"gmtCreate":1631431985471,"gmtModify":1631888314553,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Thanks for sharing","listText":"Thanks for sharing","text":"Thanks for sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/888330159","repostId":"2166377772","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1967,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":889263504,"gmtCreate":1631151671508,"gmtModify":1631888314664,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Hold on and ride to Moon, will be 3k in years time. Thanks.","listText":"Hold on and ride to Moon, will be 3k in years time. Thanks.","text":"Hold on and ride to Moon, will be 3k in years time. Thanks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/889263504","repostId":"1109193040","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818884114,"gmtCreate":1630395934638,"gmtModify":1704959644331,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03067\">$ISHARESHSTECH(03067)$</a>loss porn [流泪] [流泪] [流泪] ","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03067\">$ISHARESHSTECH(03067)$</a>loss porn [流泪] [流泪] [流泪] ","text":"$ISHARESHSTECH(03067)$loss porn [流泪] [流泪] [流泪]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f430a354e7a1ce8b4393290cd43a9b6d","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818884114","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3058,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":818884049,"gmtCreate":1630395876881,"gmtModify":1704959644159,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03067\">$ISHARESHSTECH(03067)$</a>loss porn[流泪] ","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03067\">$ISHARESHSTECH(03067)$</a>loss porn[流泪] ","text":"$ISHARESHSTECH(03067)$loss porn[流泪]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62c5fa88fb9e48d50b060db54982e427","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818884049","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3880,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":818065938,"gmtCreate":1630366770224,"gmtModify":1704959076519,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Appl shares to moon","listText":"Appl shares to moon","text":"Appl shares to moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818065938","repostId":"2163380828","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1525,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":813035207,"gmtCreate":1630113067009,"gmtModify":1704956102803,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ICar out within nxt 5yrs. Buying and holding AAPL stonks for life!","listText":"ICar out within nxt 5yrs. Buying and holding AAPL stonks for life!","text":"ICar out within nxt 5yrs. Buying and holding AAPL stonks for life!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813035207","repostId":"1162964424","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162964424","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630111098,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1162964424?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-28 08:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162964424","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is con","content":"<p>Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.</p><p><blockquote>由于某些零部件价格上涨,苹果的 iPhone 13 可能会让消费者花费更多。这对用户来说是个坏消息,但对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.</p><p><blockquote>考虑今年升级设备的IPhone用户(或那些希望转向基于iOS的产品的用户)应该期待他们的口袋更深。据 DigiTimes 报道,由于零部件通胀,苹果的 iPhone 13 可能会在下个月以更高的价格上市。</blockquote></p><p> Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>对消费者来说是坏消息,对苹果股票投资者来说可能是好消息。如果价格上涨得到证实,这将提供证据表明,在人们担心生产者和消费者价格上涨的时期,AAPL 可能是一个很好的通胀工具。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6f4ac9ebc1b90072340731dc5c1e613\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1:苹果的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生什么事了?</b></blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone已经被认为是一款昂贵的科技产品,在美国,满载的高端12 Pro Max型号的价格可能高达1400美元(见下图)。由于今年的零部件短缺,芯片制造商台积电可能会将其对苹果的零部件价格提高 3% 至 5%,这可能会导致尚未发布的 iPhone 13 的价格也出现类似的上涨。</blockquote></p><p> It is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.</p><p><blockquote>世界上最大、最成功的消费品公司之一不太可能在不确定这样做不会对新iPhone的需求产生实质性影响的情况下试图提高价格。苹果可能有能力提高价格,因为该公司了解其奢侈品牌的价值和吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0140b9b68bb9eb5dd7e88aaff384785d\" tg-width=\"707\" tg-height=\"370\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2:苹果商店上的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A quote from Jim Cramer</b></p><p><blockquote><b>吉姆·克莱默的一句话</b></blockquote></p><p> One of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.</p><p><blockquote>在可预见的未来,股市面临的最令人担忧的阻力之一是通货膨胀可能侵蚀企业利润率并导致 2021-2022 年利率上升。但如果生产者和消费者价格飙升,并非所有股票都会受到同等影响。</blockquote></p><p> Generally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:</p><p><blockquote>一般来说,拥有强大定价权、能够将较高生产成本转嫁给消费者的公司可能会跑赢大盘。这是 Mad Money 的吉姆-克莱默(Jim Cramer)最近提出的观点。以下是他的名言:</blockquote></p><p> “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.” <b>The impact to the P&L</b></p><p><blockquote>“当你试图思考这个市场上什么在起作用时......我想让你问问自己,如果公司实施涨价,你会对涨价麻木不仁吗?[有哪些]公司可以在不激怒你的情况下提高价格?去买他们的股票吧。”<b>对损益的影响</b></blockquote></p><p> Are higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.</p><p><blockquote>价格上涨对公司的财务业绩是好事还是坏事?答案是微妙的,取决于几个因素。</blockquote></p><p> Holding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件不变的情况下,更高的价格也意味着更高的收入(想想销售公式:价格乘以数量)。如果价格上涨与产品或运营成本的增加脱钩,那么价格上涨也有助于提高利润率,从而提高利润。</blockquote></p><p> However, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.</p><p><blockquote>然而,“保持其他一切不变”并不是世界的真正运作方式。价格的变化往往会对几个关键变量产生影响,其中最重要的是需求。如果价格上涨对销量没有太大影响或根本没有影响,这对收入和最有可能的盈利来说都是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> The other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.</p><p><blockquote>另一件要考虑的事情是价格上涨是完全还是仅部分抵消了更高的成本。假设后者,收入仍然可以受益,而不会对利润率和利润产生相应的积极影响。由于移动部件众多,因此很难确定价格更高的 iPhone 未来会对苹果的财务报表产生怎样的影响。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-28 08:38</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.</p><p><blockquote>由于某些零部件价格上涨,苹果的 iPhone 13 可能会让消费者花费更多。这对用户来说是个坏消息,但对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.</p><p><blockquote>考虑今年升级设备的IPhone用户(或那些希望转向基于iOS的产品的用户)应该期待他们的口袋更深。据 DigiTimes 报道,由于零部件通胀,苹果的 iPhone 13 可能会在下个月以更高的价格上市。</blockquote></p><p> Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>对消费者来说是坏消息,对苹果股票投资者来说可能是好消息。如果价格上涨得到证实,这将提供证据表明,在人们担心生产者和消费者价格上涨的时期,AAPL 可能是一个很好的通胀工具。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6f4ac9ebc1b90072340731dc5c1e613\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1:苹果的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生什么事了?</b></blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone已经被认为是一款昂贵的科技产品,在美国,满载的高端12 Pro Max型号的价格可能高达1400美元(见下图)。由于今年的零部件短缺,芯片制造商台积电可能会将其对苹果的零部件价格提高 3% 至 5%,这可能会导致尚未发布的 iPhone 13 的价格也出现类似的上涨。</blockquote></p><p> It is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.</p><p><blockquote>世界上最大、最成功的消费品公司之一不太可能在不确定这样做不会对新iPhone的需求产生实质性影响的情况下试图提高价格。苹果可能有能力提高价格,因为该公司了解其奢侈品牌的价值和吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0140b9b68bb9eb5dd7e88aaff384785d\" tg-width=\"707\" tg-height=\"370\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2:苹果商店上的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A quote from Jim Cramer</b></p><p><blockquote><b>吉姆·克莱默的一句话</b></blockquote></p><p> One of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.</p><p><blockquote>在可预见的未来,股市面临的最令人担忧的阻力之一是通货膨胀可能侵蚀企业利润率并导致 2021-2022 年利率上升。但如果生产者和消费者价格飙升,并非所有股票都会受到同等影响。</blockquote></p><p> Generally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:</p><p><blockquote>一般来说,拥有强大定价权、能够将较高生产成本转嫁给消费者的公司可能会跑赢大盘。这是 Mad Money 的吉姆-克莱默(Jim Cramer)最近提出的观点。以下是他的名言:</blockquote></p><p> “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.” <b>The impact to the P&L</b></p><p><blockquote>“当你试图思考这个市场上什么在起作用时......我想让你问问自己,如果公司实施涨价,你会对涨价麻木不仁吗?[有哪些]公司可以在不激怒你的情况下提高价格?去买他们的股票吧。”<b>对损益的影响</b></blockquote></p><p> Are higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.</p><p><blockquote>价格上涨对公司的财务业绩是好事还是坏事?答案是微妙的,取决于几个因素。</blockquote></p><p> Holding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件不变的情况下,更高的价格也意味着更高的收入(想想销售公式:价格乘以数量)。如果价格上涨与产品或运营成本的增加脱钩,那么价格上涨也有助于提高利润率,从而提高利润。</blockquote></p><p> However, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.</p><p><blockquote>然而,“保持其他一切不变”并不是世界的真正运作方式。价格的变化往往会对几个关键变量产生影响,其中最重要的是需求。如果价格上涨对销量没有太大影响或根本没有影响,这对收入和最有可能的盈利来说都是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> The other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.</p><p><blockquote>另一件要考虑的事情是价格上涨是完全还是仅部分抵消了更高的成本。假设后者,收入仍然可以受益,而不会对利润率和利润产生相应的积极影响。由于移动部件众多,因此很难确定价格更高的 iPhone 未来会对苹果的财务报表产生怎样的影响。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/iphone/apple-stock-how-it-could-be-a-great-inflation-play\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/iphone/apple-stock-how-it-could-be-a-great-inflation-play","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162964424","content_text":"Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.\nIPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.\nBad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.\nFigure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.\nWhat happened?\nThe iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.\nIt is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.\nFigure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.\nA quote from Jim Cramer\nOne of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.\nGenerally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:\n\n “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.”\n\nThe impact to the P&L\nAre higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.\nHolding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.\nHowever, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.\nThe other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3092,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819990642,"gmtCreate":1630025620286,"gmtModify":1704954750429,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Thanks for sharing. ","listText":"Thanks for sharing. ","text":"Thanks for sharing.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/819990642","repostId":"2162847016","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2032,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836405053,"gmtCreate":1629511757172,"gmtModify":1631888314525,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Pls like my post. Thanks.","listText":"Pls like my post. Thanks.","text":"Pls like my post. Thanks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836405053","repostId":"1151608193","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151608193","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629728324,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1151608193?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-23 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151608193","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.\nISTOCKPHOTO\nIn the rolling correcti","content":"<p><b>The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%。</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b24e4a76a5d1cd0ff030cf1b0eeac0f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.</p><p><blockquote>在股市的滚动调整中,芯片制造商受到的打击比大多数制造商都要大。</blockquote></p><p> The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.</p><p><blockquote>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%,而标准普尔 500 指数、纳斯达克综合指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的跌幅为 2% 或更少。</blockquote></p><p> Does that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.</p><p><blockquote>这是否意味着芯片股票值得买入?或者,这个历史上具有周期性的行业是否故技重施,陷入持续下跌趋势,让你大吃一惊。</blockquote></p><p> A lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”</p><p><blockquote>很大程度上取决于您的时间表,但如果您喜欢持有股票多年,而不是租用几天,那么该集团值得购买。主要原因: “这次不一样”。</blockquote></p><p> Those are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.</p><p><blockquote>这些无疑是投资中最可怕的词语之一。但芯片行业已经发生了很大的变化,现在确实不同了——这表明它不太可能压垮你。</blockquote></p><p> You’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为没有风险,那你就是个傻瓜。我会回顾一下这些。但首先,以下是该集团现在 “更安全 ”的三个主要原因--以及我在过去几天里与六位行业专家交谈过的六位行业专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.周期性的邪恶女巫死了</b></blockquote></p><p> “Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a> PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.</p><p><blockquote>“Impax Asset Management 的投资组合经理 David Winborne 说:”受产品周期的驱动,芯片行业的需求总是时好时坏。“<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">第一</a>电脑,然后是服务器,然后是电话。”但他表示,现在整个经济对芯片的需求已经扩大,因此长期增长故事更可预测。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">Just</a> look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a>, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">刚刚</a>看看你周围。由于我们的生活和工作日益 “数字化 ”,终端市场需求从各个角度都更加多样化。把远程办公服务想象成<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">缩放</a>看好该集团的 Gabelli Funds 投资组合经理兼技术分析师 Hendi Susanto 指出,网上购物、云服务、电动汽车、5G 手机、智能工厂、大数据计算甚至洗衣机。</blockquote></p><p> “There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”</p><p><blockquote>“Motley Fool 芯片行业分析师 John Rotonti 说:”现代数字经济的任何方面都离不开半导体。“这意味着所有东西都有更多的筹码。长期需求是存在的”。</blockquote></p><p> He’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.</p><p><blockquote>他没开玩笑。威廉·布莱尔分析师格雷格·斯科拉罗预测,到2030年,芯片行业的收入将从2020年的4650亿美元翻一番,达到1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a> chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> confirmed by a majority of large customers.”</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都意味着,你听到的大范围供应短缺 “可能要到明年年底的某个时候才能得到解决”。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>芯片行业分析师 Vivek Arya。“这不仅是我们的观点,而且<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>大多数大客户都证实了这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. The players have consolidated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2、玩家巩固</b></blockquote></p><p> All up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.</p><p><blockquote>在生产链的上下游,从设计到各类设备生产商再到制造,行业参与者已经整合成罗通蒂-评级 “赢得 ”的双头垄断或垄断。</blockquote></p><p> In chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.</p><p><blockquote>在芯片设计软件中,你有Cadence Design Systems和Synopsys。在生产设备方面,公司在极紫外光刻 (EUV) 等专业领域占据主导地位,例如 ASML。制造业由台积电和三星电子主导。</blockquote></p><p> These companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司通过在他们所做的事情上做到最好,赢得了他们的利基或双寡头地位。这使得投资者对它们感兴趣。Rotonti 表示,整合还意味着参与者在定价和产能方面的行为更加理性。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Profitability has improved</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3、盈利能力有所改善</b></blockquote></p><p> This more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.</p><p><blockquote>这种更加理性的行为,加上成本削减,意味着现在的盈利能力比历史上高得多。“温伯恩说:”在过去的几年里,芯片制造的经济性有了很大的改善。现金流或 EBITDA 利润率现在通常超过 30%,而十年前则在 20% 左右。</blockquote></p><p> This has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”</p><p><blockquote>这对估值有影响。Villere & Co. 的投资组合经理拉马尔·维莱尔 (Lamar Villere) 指出,尽管芯片股票的交易市盈率约为市盈率,但它们看起来很便宜,因为它们是更好的公司。“他们并没有以泡沫倍数进行交易”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The stocks to buy</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要买的股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.</p><p><blockquote>以下是我最近核实的芯片专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>New management plays</b></p><p><blockquote><b>新管理层玩法</b></blockquote></p><p> Though Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 Thrivent 高级股票研究分析师彼得·卡拉泽里斯 (Peter Karazeris) 有理由对该集团持谨慎态度(见下文),但他特别指出了两家公司的业绩可能会因为新管理层而得到提振:高通和安森美半导体。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Both have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">ON Semiconductor</a> is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.</p><p><blockquote>两者都具有稳定的盈利能力。高通最近受到德克萨斯州恶劣天气等一次性问题的打击,导致生产中断,但该公司对5G手机趋势有很好的了解。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">半导体</a>正在将手机以外的领域扩展到汽车、工业和物联网等新领域——联网设备领域。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A data center and gaming play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>数据中心和游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> Karazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.</p><p><blockquote>Karazeris 还特别提到了 Nvidia, 由于其卓越的设计能力, Nvidia 从数据中心和游戏设备芯片需求中获得了持续提振。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Design tool companies</b></p><p><blockquote><b>设计工具公司</b></blockquote></p><p> Speaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">Synopsys</a>.</p><p><blockquote>说到设计,当高通和英伟达等公司想要设计芯片时,他们会求助于Cadence Design Systems提供的设计工具和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">概要</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Their software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.</p><p><blockquote>Motley Fool 的 Rotonti 解释说,他们基于软件的设计工具可以帮助芯片创新者为他们的芯片创建蓝图,他特别指出了这些名字。“他们不是世界上增长最快的公司,但他们的利润率很高”。他们也主宰了太空。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An EUV play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>EUV游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> To put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>为了在芯片生产的早期阶段将这些蓝图应用到硅上,台积电和三星等公司转向了ASML。它的机器使用微小的光脉冲将芯片设计模板印在硅片上,这一过程称为极紫外线光刻。“罗通蒂说:”其他人还没有想出怎么做。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说,它在供应这样做的机器方面拥有垄断地位——这对于任何想要制造领先芯片的公司来说都是必要的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.</p><p><blockquote>以下是芯片行业投资者需要关注的一些主要风险。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Oversupply</b></p><p><blockquote><b>供过于求</b></blockquote></p><p> Chip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a> wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.</p><p><blockquote>芯片生产已经政治化。美国希望在国内生产更多,这样它就不会受到中国供应链中断的影响。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">中国</a>Winborne 表示,希望到 2025 年生产其使用的芯片的 70%,高于目前的 5%。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.</p><p><blockquote>结果是,政府为促进制造业提供了大量支持,因此会有更多支持。风险是未来某个时候供应过剩。这也可能会推动芯片设备的采购,导致未来的平静,这可能会损害设备制造商的销售和利润率趋势。</blockquote></p><p> Next, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.</p><p><blockquote>接下来,像Alphabet、苹果和亚马逊这样的大型科技公司都在做自己的芯片设计,这威胁到了做同样事情的专业芯片公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">Quantum</a> computing</b></p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">量子的</a>计算机的</b></blockquote></p><p> Computers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”</p><p><blockquote>William Blair 的 Scolaro 指出,使用基于量子物理学的芯片设计而不是传统半导体架构的计算机具有卓越的性能。“虽然量子计算可能至少在未来五年内不会成为主流,但它有潜力改变从技术到医疗保健的一切。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>A disturbing signal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>干扰信号</b></blockquote></p><p> A blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.</p><p><blockquote>全球采购经理人 (PMI) 指数在 4 月份达到峰值,然后连续三个月放缓。与此同时,芯片销售持续增长。Thrivent 跟踪该指标的 Karazeris 指出,通常两者遵循相同的趋势。他将这种差异归因于库存积累,而库存积累不如真正的终端市场需求可持续。因此,他认为这种背离是芯片行业的看跌信号。</blockquote></p><p> Another cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.</p><p><blockquote>另一个警告信号来自动态随机存取存储器(DRAM)芯片定价的预测疲软。“卡拉泽里斯说:”这些通常是在周期的顶部而不是底部看到的东西。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.</p><p><blockquote>但也有可能全球采购经理人指数的放缓更多的是芯片短缺的反映,而不是短缺并非真实存在的迹象(只是库存积压)。“Leuthold 经济学家兼策略师吉姆-保尔森(Jim Paulsen)说:”这种分歧并不一定意味着芯片订单会翻盘消亡。这意味着芯片制造业必须迎头赶上。</blockquote></p><p> Ford,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.</p><p><blockquote>例如,福特刚刚宣布不得不减产是因为芯片短缺,而不是潜在需求不足。</blockquote></p><p> Paulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> cars.</p><p><blockquote>保尔森预测,由于高储蓄率、就业和收入反弹以及对大件商品被压抑的需求等因素,体面的经济增长是可持续的。如果他是对的,持续的经济实力将支撑对所有使用芯片的产品的需求,包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>汽车。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBuy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-23 22:18</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%。</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b24e4a76a5d1cd0ff030cf1b0eeac0f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.</p><p><blockquote>在股市的滚动调整中,芯片制造商受到的打击比大多数制造商都要大。</blockquote></p><p> The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.</p><p><blockquote>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%,而标准普尔 500 指数、纳斯达克综合指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的跌幅为 2% 或更少。</blockquote></p><p> Does that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.</p><p><blockquote>这是否意味着芯片股票值得买入?或者,这个历史上具有周期性的行业是否故技重施,陷入持续下跌趋势,让你大吃一惊。</blockquote></p><p> A lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”</p><p><blockquote>很大程度上取决于您的时间表,但如果您喜欢持有股票多年,而不是租用几天,那么该集团值得购买。主要原因: “这次不一样”。</blockquote></p><p> Those are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.</p><p><blockquote>这些无疑是投资中最可怕的词语之一。但芯片行业已经发生了很大的变化,现在确实不同了——这表明它不太可能压垮你。</blockquote></p><p> You’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为没有风险,那你就是个傻瓜。我会回顾一下这些。但首先,以下是该集团现在 “更安全 ”的三个主要原因--以及我在过去几天里与六位行业专家交谈过的六位行业专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.周期性的邪恶女巫死了</b></blockquote></p><p> “Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a> PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.</p><p><blockquote>“Impax Asset Management 的投资组合经理 David Winborne 说:”受产品周期的驱动,芯片行业的需求总是时好时坏。“<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">第一</a>电脑,然后是服务器,然后是电话。”但他表示,现在整个经济对芯片的需求已经扩大,因此长期增长故事更可预测。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">Just</a> look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a>, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">刚刚</a>看看你周围。由于我们的生活和工作日益 “数字化 ”,终端市场需求从各个角度都更加多样化。把远程办公服务想象成<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">缩放</a>看好该集团的 Gabelli Funds 投资组合经理兼技术分析师 Hendi Susanto 指出,网上购物、云服务、电动汽车、5G 手机、智能工厂、大数据计算甚至洗衣机。</blockquote></p><p> “There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”</p><p><blockquote>“Motley Fool 芯片行业分析师 John Rotonti 说:”现代数字经济的任何方面都离不开半导体。“这意味着所有东西都有更多的筹码。长期需求是存在的”。</blockquote></p><p> He’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.</p><p><blockquote>他没开玩笑。威廉·布莱尔分析师格雷格·斯科拉罗预测,到2030年,芯片行业的收入将从2020年的4650亿美元翻一番,达到1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a> chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> confirmed by a majority of large customers.”</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都意味着,你听到的大范围供应短缺 “可能要到明年年底的某个时候才能得到解决”。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>芯片行业分析师 Vivek Arya。“这不仅是我们的观点,而且<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>大多数大客户都证实了这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. The players have consolidated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2、玩家巩固</b></blockquote></p><p> All up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.</p><p><blockquote>在生产链的上下游,从设计到各类设备生产商再到制造,行业参与者已经整合成罗通蒂-评级 “赢得 ”的双头垄断或垄断。</blockquote></p><p> In chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.</p><p><blockquote>在芯片设计软件中,你有Cadence Design Systems和Synopsys。在生产设备方面,公司在极紫外光刻 (EUV) 等专业领域占据主导地位,例如 ASML。制造业由台积电和三星电子主导。</blockquote></p><p> These companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司通过在他们所做的事情上做到最好,赢得了他们的利基或双寡头地位。这使得投资者对它们感兴趣。Rotonti 表示,整合还意味着参与者在定价和产能方面的行为更加理性。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Profitability has improved</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3、盈利能力有所改善</b></blockquote></p><p> This more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.</p><p><blockquote>这种更加理性的行为,加上成本削减,意味着现在的盈利能力比历史上高得多。“温伯恩说:”在过去的几年里,芯片制造的经济性有了很大的改善。现金流或 EBITDA 利润率现在通常超过 30%,而十年前则在 20% 左右。</blockquote></p><p> This has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”</p><p><blockquote>这对估值有影响。Villere & Co. 的投资组合经理拉马尔·维莱尔 (Lamar Villere) 指出,尽管芯片股票的交易市盈率约为市盈率,但它们看起来很便宜,因为它们是更好的公司。“他们并没有以泡沫倍数进行交易”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The stocks to buy</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要买的股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.</p><p><blockquote>以下是我最近核实的芯片专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>New management plays</b></p><p><blockquote><b>新管理层玩法</b></blockquote></p><p> Though Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 Thrivent 高级股票研究分析师彼得·卡拉泽里斯 (Peter Karazeris) 有理由对该集团持谨慎态度(见下文),但他特别指出了两家公司的业绩可能会因为新管理层而得到提振:高通和安森美半导体。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Both have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">ON Semiconductor</a> is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.</p><p><blockquote>两者都具有稳定的盈利能力。高通最近受到德克萨斯州恶劣天气等一次性问题的打击,导致生产中断,但该公司对5G手机趋势有很好的了解。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">半导体</a>正在将手机以外的领域扩展到汽车、工业和物联网等新领域——联网设备领域。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A data center and gaming play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>数据中心和游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> Karazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.</p><p><blockquote>Karazeris 还特别提到了 Nvidia, 由于其卓越的设计能力, Nvidia 从数据中心和游戏设备芯片需求中获得了持续提振。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Design tool companies</b></p><p><blockquote><b>设计工具公司</b></blockquote></p><p> Speaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">Synopsys</a>.</p><p><blockquote>说到设计,当高通和英伟达等公司想要设计芯片时,他们会求助于Cadence Design Systems提供的设计工具和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">概要</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Their software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.</p><p><blockquote>Motley Fool 的 Rotonti 解释说,他们基于软件的设计工具可以帮助芯片创新者为他们的芯片创建蓝图,他特别指出了这些名字。“他们不是世界上增长最快的公司,但他们的利润率很高”。他们也主宰了太空。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An EUV play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>EUV游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> To put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>为了在芯片生产的早期阶段将这些蓝图应用到硅上,台积电和三星等公司转向了ASML。它的机器使用微小的光脉冲将芯片设计模板印在硅片上,这一过程称为极紫外线光刻。“罗通蒂说:”其他人还没有想出怎么做。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说,它在供应这样做的机器方面拥有垄断地位——这对于任何想要制造领先芯片的公司来说都是必要的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.</p><p><blockquote>以下是芯片行业投资者需要关注的一些主要风险。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Oversupply</b></p><p><blockquote><b>供过于求</b></blockquote></p><p> Chip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a> wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.</p><p><blockquote>芯片生产已经政治化。美国希望在国内生产更多,这样它就不会受到中国供应链中断的影响。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">中国</a>Winborne 表示,希望到 2025 年生产其使用的芯片的 70%,高于目前的 5%。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.</p><p><blockquote>结果是,政府为促进制造业提供了大量支持,因此会有更多支持。风险是未来某个时候供应过剩。这也可能会推动芯片设备的采购,导致未来的平静,这可能会损害设备制造商的销售和利润率趋势。</blockquote></p><p> Next, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.</p><p><blockquote>接下来,像Alphabet、苹果和亚马逊这样的大型科技公司都在做自己的芯片设计,这威胁到了做同样事情的专业芯片公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">Quantum</a> computing</b></p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">量子的</a>计算机的</b></blockquote></p><p> Computers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”</p><p><blockquote>William Blair 的 Scolaro 指出,使用基于量子物理学的芯片设计而不是传统半导体架构的计算机具有卓越的性能。“虽然量子计算可能至少在未来五年内不会成为主流,但它有潜力改变从技术到医疗保健的一切。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>A disturbing signal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>干扰信号</b></blockquote></p><p> A blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.</p><p><blockquote>全球采购经理人 (PMI) 指数在 4 月份达到峰值,然后连续三个月放缓。与此同时,芯片销售持续增长。Thrivent 跟踪该指标的 Karazeris 指出,通常两者遵循相同的趋势。他将这种差异归因于库存积累,而库存积累不如真正的终端市场需求可持续。因此,他认为这种背离是芯片行业的看跌信号。</blockquote></p><p> Another cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.</p><p><blockquote>另一个警告信号来自动态随机存取存储器(DRAM)芯片定价的预测疲软。“卡拉泽里斯说:”这些通常是在周期的顶部而不是底部看到的东西。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.</p><p><blockquote>但也有可能全球采购经理人指数的放缓更多的是芯片短缺的反映,而不是短缺并非真实存在的迹象(只是库存积压)。“Leuthold 经济学家兼策略师吉姆-保尔森(Jim Paulsen)说:”这种分歧并不一定意味着芯片订单会翻盘消亡。这意味着芯片制造业必须迎头赶上。</blockquote></p><p> Ford,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.</p><p><blockquote>例如,福特刚刚宣布不得不减产是因为芯片短缺,而不是潜在需求不足。</blockquote></p><p> Paulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> cars.</p><p><blockquote>保尔森预测,由于高储蓄率、就业和收入反弹以及对大件商品被压抑的需求等因素,体面的经济增长是可持续的。如果他是对的,持续的经济实力将支撑对所有使用芯片的产品的需求,包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>汽车。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/buy-the-pullback-in-chip-stocks-and-focus-on-these-6-companies-for-the-long-haul-11629468380?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNPS":"新思科技","AAPL":"苹果","TSM":"台积电","QCOM":"高通","NVDA":"英伟达","CDNS":"铿腾电子","GOOG":"谷歌","ASML":"阿斯麦","GOOGL":"谷歌A","SSNLF":"三星电子","AMZN":"亚马逊","SOXX":"iShares费城交易所半导体ETF","ON":"安森美半导体"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/buy-the-pullback-in-chip-stocks-and-focus-on-these-6-companies-for-the-long-haul-11629468380?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151608193","content_text":"The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.\nISTOCKPHOTO\nIn the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.\nThe iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.\nDoes that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.\nA lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”\nThose are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.\nYou’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.\n1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead\n“Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “First PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.\nJust look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like Zoom, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.\n“There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”\nHe’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.\nAll of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says Bank of America chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but one confirmed by a majority of large customers.”\n2. The players have consolidated\nAll up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.\nIn chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.\nThese companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.\n3. Profitability has improved\nThis more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.\nThis has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”\nThe stocks to buy\nHere are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.\nNew management plays\nThough Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.\nBoth have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. ON Semiconductor is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.\nA data center and gaming play\nKarazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.\nDesign tool companies\nSpeaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.\nTheir software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.\nAn EUV play\nTo put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.\nIn other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.\nRisks\nHere are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.\nOversupply\nChip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. China wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.\nThe upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.\nNext, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.\nQuantum computing\nComputers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”\nA disturbing signal\nA blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.\nAnother cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.\nBut it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.\nFord,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.\nPaulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including Ford cars.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOGL":0.9,"ON":0.9,"SOXX":0.9,"ASML":0.9,"TSM":0.9,"SSNLF":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"SNPS":0.9,"NVDA":0.9,"CDNS":0.9,"QCOM":0.9,"GOOG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3450,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":838571802,"gmtCreate":1629421749906,"gmtModify":1631889148290,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Trust mama kathy!!! All is good.","listText":"Trust mama kathy!!! All is good.","text":"Trust mama kathy!!! All is good.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/838571802","repostId":"2160848793","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2160848793","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1629420499,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2160848793?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-20 08:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Ark's Cathie Wood says stock market 'couldn't be further away from a bubble.' Here's why.<blockquote>Ark 的凯西·伍德 (Cathie Wood) 表示,股市“离泡沫已经不远了”。原因如下。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160848793","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Wood says she's emboldened by bad news\nCathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment off","content":"<p>Wood says she's emboldened by bad news</p><p><blockquote>伍德说她被坏消息鼓舞了</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b1e646cb0a6ddf4ac942ed5c913a4e4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Cathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Cathie Wood,ARK Investment Management 首席执行官兼首席投资官</span></p></blockquote></p><p> There'a growing sense of unease emanating from equity markets in recent trade, despite, and perhaps because, of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 index trading near record heights.</p><p><blockquote>尽管道琼斯工业平均指数和标普500指数接近历史新高,但在最近的交易中,股市越来越感到不安。</blockquote></p><p> However, star investor Cathie Wood, who runs a suite of popular ETFs in Ark Investment Management, says that there's no reason to fear that the market is becoming too bubblicious.</p><p><blockquote>然而,在 Ark Investment Management 管理一套热门 ETF 的明星投资者凯西·伍德 (Cathie Wood) 表示,没有理由担心市场变得过于泡沫。</blockquote></p><p> As the Ark founder puts it: \"I don't think we're in a bubble which is what I think many bears think we are,\" during a Thursday interview with CNBC near midday .</p><p><blockquote>正如 Ark 创始人在周四中午接受 CNBC 采访时所说:“我不认为我们正处于泡沫中,而我认为许多空头认为我们正处于泡沫中。”</blockquote></p><p> Her comments coming amid intensifying worries about a possible slowdown in economic growth as the delta variant of COVID-19 gathers momentum, creating headwinds for a fuller recovery from the pandemic that has gripped the globe for well over a year.</p><p><blockquote>她发表上述言论之际,随着 COVID-19 德尔塔变异毒株势头增强,人们对经济增长可能放缓的担忧日益加剧,这给席卷全球一年多的疫情带来了更全面的复苏带来了阻力。</blockquote></p><p> Investors also have been wringing their hands over the prospects of the Federal Reserve scaling back easy-money policies, notably the monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortage-backed securities, as anxieties grow.</p><p><blockquote>随着担忧加剧,投资者也对美联储缩减宽松货币政策的前景感到担忧,特别是每月购买 1200 亿美元的国债和抵押贷款支持证券。</blockquote></p><p> Wood's investment funds, highlighted by the flagship Ark Innovation, have been <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> area that has been cited as possibly overvalued and vulnerable to a dramatic swing lower if the market starts to deflate considerably from its current levels.</p><p><blockquote>伍德的投资基金以旗舰方舟创新为亮点,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>该领域被认为可能被高估,如果市场开始从当前水平大幅下跌,则可能会大幅下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Ark Innovation ETF is down 5.2% so far this week and has lost 8.6% in the year to date, badly underperforming the broader market and coming after the fund rang up one-year return of 149%, FactSet data show.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 数据显示,Ark Innovation ETF 本周迄今已下跌 5.2%,今年迄今已下跌 8.6%,远逊于大盘,此前该基金的一年回报率为 149%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cca916bae90134d64f9ba249031e782\" tg-width=\"949\" tg-height=\"666\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> By comparison , the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 1.8% this week but up 14% this year, while the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index is off 1.9% on the week but has risen over 12.8% so far in 2021, and the broad-market S&P 500 index is off 1.4% in the week to date but boasts a nearly 17.3% gain for 2021.</p><p><blockquote>相比之下,道琼斯工业平均指数本周下跌 1.8%,但今年上涨 14%,而科技含量高的纳斯达克综合指数本周下跌 1.9%,但 2021 年迄今已上涨超过 12.8%,大盘标普500指数本周迄今已下跌 1.4%,但 2021 年上涨近 17.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Wood's view on the market, however, is that investors are acting much more sedately and prudently, compared with the euphoria that was characteristic of the late 1990s and early 2000s dot-com boom.</p><p><blockquote>然而,伍德对市场的看法是,与 20 世纪 90 年代末和 21 世纪初互联网繁荣时期特有的兴奋相比,投资者的行为要冷静和谨慎得多。</blockquote></p><p> \"In a bubble...and I remember the late '90s...our strategies would have been cheered on,\" she told the business network. \"You remember the leapfrogging of analysts making estimates one higher than the other, price targets one higher than the other,\" she said on \"Tech Check.\"</p><p><blockquote>“在泡沫中……我记得 90 年代末……我们的战略会受到欢迎,”她告诉商业网络。她在“Tech Check”节目中表示:“你还记得分析师们的预测一个比另一个高,价格目标一个比另一个高。”</blockquote></p><p> She also noted that negative sentiment in the market as a contra-indication, suggesting that growing pessimism may actually fuel further gains rather than inflating a bubble.</p><p><blockquote>她还指出,市场的负面情绪是一个禁忌症,这表明日益增长的悲观情绪实际上可能会推动进一步上涨,而不是吹大泡沫。</blockquote></p><p> \"I like bad news,\" she said.</p><p><blockquote>“我喜欢坏消息,”她说。</blockquote></p><p> \"When I see such negative sentiment out there, especially when it comes to valuation and longer time horizons, investment time horizons, I actually feel a little more comfortable,\" Wood said.</p><p><blockquote>伍德说:“当我看到这种负面情绪时,特别是当涉及到估值和更长的时间范围、投资时间范围时,我实际上感觉更舒服了一些。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ark's Cathie Wood says stock market 'couldn't be further away from a bubble.' Here's why.<blockquote>Ark 的凯西·伍德 (Cathie Wood) 表示,股市“离泡沫已经不远了”。原因如下。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nArk's Cathie Wood says stock market 'couldn't be further away from a bubble.' Here's why.<blockquote>Ark 的凯西·伍德 (Cathie Wood) 表示,股市“离泡沫已经不远了”。原因如下。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-20 08:48</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Wood says she's emboldened by bad news</p><p><blockquote>伍德说她被坏消息鼓舞了</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b1e646cb0a6ddf4ac942ed5c913a4e4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Cathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>Cathie Wood,ARK Investment Management 首席执行官兼首席投资官</span></p></blockquote></p><p> There'a growing sense of unease emanating from equity markets in recent trade, despite, and perhaps because, of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 index trading near record heights.</p><p><blockquote>尽管道琼斯工业平均指数和标普500指数接近历史新高,但在最近的交易中,股市越来越感到不安。</blockquote></p><p> However, star investor Cathie Wood, who runs a suite of popular ETFs in Ark Investment Management, says that there's no reason to fear that the market is becoming too bubblicious.</p><p><blockquote>然而,在 Ark Investment Management 管理一套热门 ETF 的明星投资者凯西·伍德 (Cathie Wood) 表示,没有理由担心市场变得过于泡沫。</blockquote></p><p> As the Ark founder puts it: \"I don't think we're in a bubble which is what I think many bears think we are,\" during a Thursday interview with CNBC near midday .</p><p><blockquote>正如 Ark 创始人在周四中午接受 CNBC 采访时所说:“我不认为我们正处于泡沫中,而我认为许多空头认为我们正处于泡沫中。”</blockquote></p><p> Her comments coming amid intensifying worries about a possible slowdown in economic growth as the delta variant of COVID-19 gathers momentum, creating headwinds for a fuller recovery from the pandemic that has gripped the globe for well over a year.</p><p><blockquote>她发表上述言论之际,随着 COVID-19 德尔塔变异毒株势头增强,人们对经济增长可能放缓的担忧日益加剧,这给席卷全球一年多的疫情带来了更全面的复苏带来了阻力。</blockquote></p><p> Investors also have been wringing their hands over the prospects of the Federal Reserve scaling back easy-money policies, notably the monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortage-backed securities, as anxieties grow.</p><p><blockquote>随着担忧加剧,投资者也对美联储缩减宽松货币政策的前景感到担忧,特别是每月购买 1200 亿美元的国债和抵押贷款支持证券。</blockquote></p><p> Wood's investment funds, highlighted by the flagship Ark Innovation, have been <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> area that has been cited as possibly overvalued and vulnerable to a dramatic swing lower if the market starts to deflate considerably from its current levels.</p><p><blockquote>伍德的投资基金以旗舰方舟创新为亮点,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>该领域被认为可能被高估,如果市场开始从当前水平大幅下跌,则可能会大幅下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Ark Innovation ETF is down 5.2% so far this week and has lost 8.6% in the year to date, badly underperforming the broader market and coming after the fund rang up one-year return of 149%, FactSet data show.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet 数据显示,Ark Innovation ETF 本周迄今已下跌 5.2%,今年迄今已下跌 8.6%,远逊于大盘,此前该基金的一年回报率为 149%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cca916bae90134d64f9ba249031e782\" tg-width=\"949\" tg-height=\"666\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> By comparison , the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 1.8% this week but up 14% this year, while the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index is off 1.9% on the week but has risen over 12.8% so far in 2021, and the broad-market S&P 500 index is off 1.4% in the week to date but boasts a nearly 17.3% gain for 2021.</p><p><blockquote>相比之下,道琼斯工业平均指数本周下跌 1.8%,但今年上涨 14%,而科技含量高的纳斯达克综合指数本周下跌 1.9%,但 2021 年迄今已上涨超过 12.8%,大盘标普500指数本周迄今已下跌 1.4%,但 2021 年上涨近 17.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Wood's view on the market, however, is that investors are acting much more sedately and prudently, compared with the euphoria that was characteristic of the late 1990s and early 2000s dot-com boom.</p><p><blockquote>然而,伍德对市场的看法是,与 20 世纪 90 年代末和 21 世纪初互联网繁荣时期特有的兴奋相比,投资者的行为要冷静和谨慎得多。</blockquote></p><p> \"In a bubble...and I remember the late '90s...our strategies would have been cheered on,\" she told the business network. \"You remember the leapfrogging of analysts making estimates one higher than the other, price targets one higher than the other,\" she said on \"Tech Check.\"</p><p><blockquote>“在泡沫中……我记得 90 年代末……我们的战略会受到欢迎,”她告诉商业网络。她在“Tech Check”节目中表示:“你还记得分析师们的预测一个比另一个高,价格目标一个比另一个高。”</blockquote></p><p> She also noted that negative sentiment in the market as a contra-indication, suggesting that growing pessimism may actually fuel further gains rather than inflating a bubble.</p><p><blockquote>她还指出,市场的负面情绪是一个禁忌症,这表明日益增长的悲观情绪实际上可能会推动进一步上涨,而不是吹大泡沫。</blockquote></p><p> \"I like bad news,\" she said.</p><p><blockquote>“我喜欢坏消息,”她说。</blockquote></p><p> \"When I see such negative sentiment out there, especially when it comes to valuation and longer time horizons, investment time horizons, I actually feel a little more comfortable,\" Wood said.</p><p><blockquote>伍德说:“当我看到这种负面情绪时,特别是当涉及到估值和更长的时间范围、投资时间范围时,我实际上感觉更舒服了一些。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/arks-cathie-wood-says-stock-market-couldnt-be-further-away-from-a-bubble-heres-why-11629393761?adobe_mc=MCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1629420103\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/arks-cathie-wood-says-stock-market-couldnt-be-further-away-from-a-bubble-heres-why-11629393761?adobe_mc=MCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1629420103","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2160848793","content_text":"Wood says she's emboldened by bad news\nCathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management\nThere'a growing sense of unease emanating from equity markets in recent trade, despite, and perhaps because, of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 index trading near record heights.\nHowever, star investor Cathie Wood, who runs a suite of popular ETFs in Ark Investment Management, says that there's no reason to fear that the market is becoming too bubblicious.\nAs the Ark founder puts it: \"I don't think we're in a bubble which is what I think many bears think we are,\" during a Thursday interview with CNBC near midday .\nHer comments coming amid intensifying worries about a possible slowdown in economic growth as the delta variant of COVID-19 gathers momentum, creating headwinds for a fuller recovery from the pandemic that has gripped the globe for well over a year.\nInvestors also have been wringing their hands over the prospects of the Federal Reserve scaling back easy-money policies, notably the monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortage-backed securities, as anxieties grow.\nWood's investment funds, highlighted by the flagship Ark Innovation, have been one area that has been cited as possibly overvalued and vulnerable to a dramatic swing lower if the market starts to deflate considerably from its current levels.\nArk Innovation ETF is down 5.2% so far this week and has lost 8.6% in the year to date, badly underperforming the broader market and coming after the fund rang up one-year return of 149%, FactSet data show.\n\nBy comparison , the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 1.8% this week but up 14% this year, while the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index is off 1.9% on the week but has risen over 12.8% so far in 2021, and the broad-market S&P 500 index is off 1.4% in the week to date but boasts a nearly 17.3% gain for 2021.\nWood's view on the market, however, is that investors are acting much more sedately and prudently, compared with the euphoria that was characteristic of the late 1990s and early 2000s dot-com boom.\n\"In a bubble...and I remember the late '90s...our strategies would have been cheered on,\" she told the business network. \"You remember the leapfrogging of analysts making estimates one higher than the other, price targets one higher than the other,\" she said on \"Tech Check.\"\nShe also noted that negative sentiment in the market as a contra-indication, suggesting that growing pessimism may actually fuel further gains rather than inflating a bubble.\n\"I like bad news,\" she said.\n\"When I see such negative sentiment out there, especially when it comes to valuation and longer time horizons, investment time horizons, I actually feel a little more comfortable,\" Wood said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"ARKK":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"ARKIU":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2771,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":831430751,"gmtCreate":1629339312573,"gmtModify":1631888314703,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Buy the dip!!! Stonks only go up","listText":"Buy the dip!!! Stonks only go up","text":"Buy the dip!!! Stonks only go up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/831430751","repostId":"1173912409","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173912409","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629328047,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1173912409?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-19 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks End the Day in an Ugly Way After Fed Minutes Show Taper Talk Is Serious<blockquote>美联储会议纪要显示缩减规模谈判是认真的,股市以丑陋的方式收盘</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173912409","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stocks sold off Wednesday after the release of the minutes of the Federal Reserve’s July meeting.\nTh","content":"<p>Stocks sold off Wednesday after the release of the minutes of the Federal Reserve’s July meeting.</p><p><blockquote>美联储7月会议纪要公布后,股市周三遭到抛售。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 383 points, or 1.1%, while the S&P 500 fell 1.1%. The Nasdaq Composite declined 0.9%. All three finished near their lows of the day.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌383点,跌幅1.1%,标普500下跌1.1%。纳斯达克综合指数下跌 0.9%。三者都接近当天的低点。</blockquote></p><p> Fed governors have been dropping hints in recent weeks that the beginning of the end of the central bank’s bond buying was nearing, and the minutes confirmed that taperingis at hand. “Most participants noted that …it could be appropriate to start reducing the pace of asset purchases this year,” the minutes read.</p><p><blockquote>最近几周,美联储理事们一直在暗示央行即将结束债券购买,会议纪要也证实了缩减债券规模即将到来。“会议纪要写道:”大多数与会者指出.今年开始放慢资产购买步伐可能是合适的。</blockquote></p><p> The assessment comes as the economy has recovered quickly, and reflects that the Fed is now focused on when—and how quickly—to remove support from the economy.</p><p><blockquote>该评估是在经济迅速复苏之际做出的,反映出美联储现在正关注何时以及以多快的速度取消对经济的支持。</blockquote></p><p> The selloff was broad. About 83% of S&P 500 stocks fell on the day, according to FactSet. This dynamics often reflects concern about how the market will perform without the Fed there to support it.</p><p><blockquote>抛售范围很广。FactSet 的数据显示,当天约 83% 的标普500股票下跌。这种动态通常反映出人们对如果没有美联储的支持,市场将如何表现的担忧。</blockquote></p><p> Now, it’s just a question of when tapering will begin. It’ “is going to be September or December,” said Dave Wagner, portfolio manager and analyst at Aptus Capital Advisors. “Everyone is focusing on Jackson Hole in my opinion,” he continued, referring to the conclave of central bankers that occurs later this month in Jackson Hole, Wyo.</p><p><blockquote>现在,只是何时开始缩减规模的问题。Aptus Capital Advisors 的投资组合经理兼分析师戴夫-瓦格纳(Dave Wagner)说:“这将是 9 月或 12 月。”“在我看来,每个人都在关注杰克逊霍尔,”他继续说道,指的是本月晚些时候将在怀俄明州杰克逊霍尔举行的央行行长秘密会议。</blockquote></p><p> Strangely, the bond market didn’t react all that much, with the 10-year Treasury yield closing at 1.27%, where it hovered for most of the day. The 2-year yield, which often moves higher when market participants see the Fed hiking short-term interest rates sooner, ended at 0.21%, lower than the 0.22% it hit in the morning.</p><p><blockquote>奇怪的是,债券市场并没有太大反应,10 年期国债收益率收于 1.27%,在当天的大部分时间里都徘徊在这一水平。当市场参与者看到美联储提前加息时,2年期国债收益率通常会走高,收于0.21%,低于上午触及的0.22%。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think we’ve learned anything new,” said Tom Graff, head of fixed income at Brown Advisory. Graff added that the consensus for a short-term interest rate hikes in 2022 or 2023 hasn’t changed.</p><p><blockquote>“布朗咨询公司固定收益主管汤姆-格拉夫(Tom Graff)说:”我认为我们没有学到任何新东西。格拉夫补充说,2022 年或 2023 年短期加息的共识没有改变。</blockquote></p><p> A weak market, however, couldn’t keep some stocks down. For some, it was about earnings.Lowe’s (ticker: LOW) stock rose 9.6% after reporting a profit of $4.25 a share, beating estimates of $4.01 a share, on sales of $27.6 billion, above expectations for $26.9 billion.TJX (TJX) stock rose 6% after reporting a profit of 64 cents a share, beating estimates of 59 cents a share, on sales of $12.1 billion, above expectations for $11 billion.</p><p><blockquote>然而,疲软的市场并没有让一些股票下跌。对一些人来说,这与盈利有关。劳氏(股票代码:LOW)公布每股利润 4.25 美元,高于预期的每股 4.01 美元,销售额为 276 亿美元,高于预期的 269 亿美元。TJX (TJX) 公布每股利润 64 美分,高于预期的每股 59 美分,销售额为 121 亿美元,高于预期的 110 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Others were buoyed by analyst upgrades, with ViacomCBS (VIAC) stock rose 3.7% after getting upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo, and BlackBerry (BB) stock gained 4.2% after getting upgraded to Hold from Sell at Canaccord Genuity.</p><p><blockquote>其他股票则受到分析师评级上调的提振,维亚康姆哥伦比亚广播公司 (VIAC) 股价在富国银行 (Wells Fargo) 从持有评级上调至跑赢大盘后上涨 3.7%,黑莓 (BB) 股价在 Canaccord Genuity 从卖出评级上调至持有后上涨 4.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Tilray (TLRY) stock rose 1.1% after the company bought senior secured convertible notes in marijuana company MedMen Enterprises. The notes would convert into an equity stake if cannabis is legalized in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>Tilray(TLRY)股价上涨1.1%,此前该公司购买了大麻公司MedMen Enterprises的高级担保可转换票据。如果大麻在美国合法化,这些票据将转换成股权。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks End the Day in an Ugly Way After Fed Minutes Show Taper Talk Is Serious<blockquote>美联储会议纪要显示缩减规模谈判是认真的,股市以丑陋的方式收盘</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks End the Day in an Ugly Way After Fed Minutes Show Taper Talk Is Serious<blockquote>美联储会议纪要显示缩减规模谈判是认真的,股市以丑陋的方式收盘</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-19 07:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stocks sold off Wednesday after the release of the minutes of the Federal Reserve’s July meeting.</p><p><blockquote>美联储7月会议纪要公布后,股市周三遭到抛售。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 383 points, or 1.1%, while the S&P 500 fell 1.1%. The Nasdaq Composite declined 0.9%. All three finished near their lows of the day.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌383点,跌幅1.1%,标普500下跌1.1%。纳斯达克综合指数下跌 0.9%。三者都接近当天的低点。</blockquote></p><p> Fed governors have been dropping hints in recent weeks that the beginning of the end of the central bank’s bond buying was nearing, and the minutes confirmed that taperingis at hand. “Most participants noted that …it could be appropriate to start reducing the pace of asset purchases this year,” the minutes read.</p><p><blockquote>最近几周,美联储理事们一直在暗示央行即将结束债券购买,会议纪要也证实了缩减债券规模即将到来。“会议纪要写道:”大多数与会者指出.今年开始放慢资产购买步伐可能是合适的。</blockquote></p><p> The assessment comes as the economy has recovered quickly, and reflects that the Fed is now focused on when—and how quickly—to remove support from the economy.</p><p><blockquote>该评估是在经济迅速复苏之际做出的,反映出美联储现在正关注何时以及以多快的速度取消对经济的支持。</blockquote></p><p> The selloff was broad. About 83% of S&P 500 stocks fell on the day, according to FactSet. This dynamics often reflects concern about how the market will perform without the Fed there to support it.</p><p><blockquote>抛售范围很广。FactSet 的数据显示,当天约 83% 的标普500股票下跌。这种动态通常反映出人们对如果没有美联储的支持,市场将如何表现的担忧。</blockquote></p><p> Now, it’s just a question of when tapering will begin. It’ “is going to be September or December,” said Dave Wagner, portfolio manager and analyst at Aptus Capital Advisors. “Everyone is focusing on Jackson Hole in my opinion,” he continued, referring to the conclave of central bankers that occurs later this month in Jackson Hole, Wyo.</p><p><blockquote>现在,只是何时开始缩减规模的问题。Aptus Capital Advisors 的投资组合经理兼分析师戴夫-瓦格纳(Dave Wagner)说:“这将是 9 月或 12 月。”“在我看来,每个人都在关注杰克逊霍尔,”他继续说道,指的是本月晚些时候将在怀俄明州杰克逊霍尔举行的央行行长秘密会议。</blockquote></p><p> Strangely, the bond market didn’t react all that much, with the 10-year Treasury yield closing at 1.27%, where it hovered for most of the day. The 2-year yield, which often moves higher when market participants see the Fed hiking short-term interest rates sooner, ended at 0.21%, lower than the 0.22% it hit in the morning.</p><p><blockquote>奇怪的是,债券市场并没有太大反应,10 年期国债收益率收于 1.27%,在当天的大部分时间里都徘徊在这一水平。当市场参与者看到美联储提前加息时,2年期国债收益率通常会走高,收于0.21%,低于上午触及的0.22%。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think we’ve learned anything new,” said Tom Graff, head of fixed income at Brown Advisory. Graff added that the consensus for a short-term interest rate hikes in 2022 or 2023 hasn’t changed.</p><p><blockquote>“布朗咨询公司固定收益主管汤姆-格拉夫(Tom Graff)说:”我认为我们没有学到任何新东西。格拉夫补充说,2022 年或 2023 年短期加息的共识没有改变。</blockquote></p><p> A weak market, however, couldn’t keep some stocks down. For some, it was about earnings.Lowe’s (ticker: LOW) stock rose 9.6% after reporting a profit of $4.25 a share, beating estimates of $4.01 a share, on sales of $27.6 billion, above expectations for $26.9 billion.TJX (TJX) stock rose 6% after reporting a profit of 64 cents a share, beating estimates of 59 cents a share, on sales of $12.1 billion, above expectations for $11 billion.</p><p><blockquote>然而,疲软的市场并没有让一些股票下跌。对一些人来说,这与盈利有关。劳氏(股票代码:LOW)公布每股利润 4.25 美元,高于预期的每股 4.01 美元,销售额为 276 亿美元,高于预期的 269 亿美元。TJX (TJX) 公布每股利润 64 美分,高于预期的每股 59 美分,销售额为 121 亿美元,高于预期的 110 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Others were buoyed by analyst upgrades, with ViacomCBS (VIAC) stock rose 3.7% after getting upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo, and BlackBerry (BB) stock gained 4.2% after getting upgraded to Hold from Sell at Canaccord Genuity.</p><p><blockquote>其他股票则受到分析师评级上调的提振,维亚康姆哥伦比亚广播公司 (VIAC) 股价在富国银行 (Wells Fargo) 从持有评级上调至跑赢大盘后上涨 3.7%,黑莓 (BB) 股价在 Canaccord Genuity 从卖出评级上调至持有后上涨 4.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Tilray (TLRY) stock rose 1.1% after the company bought senior secured convertible notes in marijuana company MedMen Enterprises. The notes would convert into an equity stake if cannabis is legalized in the U.S.</p><p><blockquote>Tilray(TLRY)股价上涨1.1%,此前该公司购买了大麻公司MedMen Enterprises的高级担保可转换票据。如果大麻在美国合法化,这些票据将转换成股权。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-today-51629283162?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","TLRY":"Tilray Inc.","LOW":"劳氏","BB":"黑莓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","TJX":"The TJX Companies Inc.",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-today-51629283162?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173912409","content_text":"Stocks sold off Wednesday after the release of the minutes of the Federal Reserve’s July meeting.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 383 points, or 1.1%, while the S&P 500 fell 1.1%. The Nasdaq Composite declined 0.9%. All three finished near their lows of the day.\nFed governors have been dropping hints in recent weeks that the beginning of the end of the central bank’s bond buying was nearing, and the minutes confirmed that taperingis at hand. “Most participants noted that …it could be appropriate to start reducing the pace of asset purchases this year,” the minutes read.\nThe assessment comes as the economy has recovered quickly, and reflects that the Fed is now focused on when—and how quickly—to remove support from the economy.\nThe selloff was broad. About 83% of S&P 500 stocks fell on the day, according to FactSet. This dynamics often reflects concern about how the market will perform without the Fed there to support it.\nNow, it’s just a question of when tapering will begin. It’ “is going to be September or December,” said Dave Wagner, portfolio manager and analyst at Aptus Capital Advisors. “Everyone is focusing on Jackson Hole in my opinion,” he continued, referring to the conclave of central bankers that occurs later this month in Jackson Hole, Wyo.\nStrangely, the bond market didn’t react all that much, with the 10-year Treasury yield closing at 1.27%, where it hovered for most of the day. The 2-year yield, which often moves higher when market participants see the Fed hiking short-term interest rates sooner, ended at 0.21%, lower than the 0.22% it hit in the morning.\n“I don’t think we’ve learned anything new,” said Tom Graff, head of fixed income at Brown Advisory. Graff added that the consensus for a short-term interest rate hikes in 2022 or 2023 hasn’t changed.\nA weak market, however, couldn’t keep some stocks down. For some, it was about earnings.Lowe’s (ticker: LOW) stock rose 9.6% after reporting a profit of $4.25 a share, beating estimates of $4.01 a share, on sales of $27.6 billion, above expectations for $26.9 billion.TJX (TJX) stock rose 6% after reporting a profit of 64 cents a share, beating estimates of 59 cents a share, on sales of $12.1 billion, above expectations for $11 billion.\nOthers were buoyed by analyst upgrades, with ViacomCBS (VIAC) stock rose 3.7% after getting upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo, and BlackBerry (BB) stock gained 4.2% after getting upgraded to Hold from Sell at Canaccord Genuity.\nTilray (TLRY) stock rose 1.1% after the company bought senior secured convertible notes in marijuana company MedMen Enterprises. The notes would convert into an equity stake if cannabis is legalized in the U.S.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LOW":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"TJX":0.9,"TLRY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"BB":0.9,"VIAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3625,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833530698,"gmtCreate":1629248855114,"gmtModify":1631888314742,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Buy the dip, driving my tesla to moon in years to come! Pls like my post! Thanks","listText":"Buy the dip, driving my tesla to moon in years to come! Pls like my post! Thanks","text":"Buy the dip, driving my tesla to moon in years to come! Pls like my post! Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833530698","repostId":"1189114396","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189114396","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629247487,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1189114396?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-18 08:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Stock Sells off While Institutions Continue to Buy.<blockquote>特斯拉股票遭到抛售,而机构继续买入。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189114396","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Tesla stock has tumbled almost 10% off recent highs but institutions are continuing to buy.\nIn a mar","content":"<p>Tesla stock has tumbled almost 10% off recent highs but institutions are continuing to buy.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价已较近期高点下跌近 10%,但机构仍在继续买入。</blockquote></p><p> In a market filled with liquidity, the \"buy the dip mentality\" continues to persist. This appears to be true with Tesla stock and institutions.</p><p><blockquote>在流动性充裕的市场中,“逢低买入心态”继续挥之不去。特斯拉股票和机构似乎确实如此。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Demand for Shares Increases in Q3</b></p><p><blockquote><b>第三季度股票需求增加</b></blockquote></p><p> Q3 has been on pace to be the first quarter since Q4 2020 to have an overall net inflow of Tesla stock into institutions—those with at least $100 million under management. Currently, there is a net inflow of $7 billion of Tesla stock into institutions. 13F filings were due August 15th to show any quarter-over-quarter changes in Q2, however, institutions can continue to update positions throughout the third quarter.</p><p><blockquote>第三季度有望成为自2020年第四季度以来第一个特斯拉股票整体净流入机构的季度,这些机构管理着至少1亿美元。目前,有70亿美元的特斯拉股票净流入机构。13F 文件将于 8 月 15 日提交,以显示第二季度的任何环比变化,但是,机构可以在整个第三季度继续更新头寸。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/373bcfeda661a3fdddb1ad430c075270\" tg-width=\"683\" tg-height=\"604\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>via: marketbeat.com</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源:marketbeat.com</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Of those \"buying the dip\" the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, increased their position 617% quarter-over-quarter for a total of 330,196 shares. While this accounts for a small position in the under management for CPPIB, others have made Tesla a larger portion of their portfolio. Australia-based Hyperion Asset Management has also increased its Tesla stock position by over 20%. As a result of the additional shares, Tesla stock is now over 15% of Hyperions portfolio demonstrating more conviction than Cathie Wood'sARKKwith a ~10% allocation to Tesla stock.</p><p><blockquote>在那些“逢低买入”的人中,加拿大养老金计划投资委员会(Canada Pension Plan Investment Board)的持仓环比增加了617%,总计330,196股。虽然这在 CPPIB 的管理层中所占比例很小,但其他公司已将特斯拉纳入其投资组合的更大一部分。总部位于澳大利亚的 Hyperion Asset Management 也将其特斯拉股票头寸增加了 20% 以上。由于增发了股票,特斯拉股票现在占Hyperions投资组合的15%以上,比Cathie Wood的Sarkk更有信心,将约10%的股票配置给了特斯拉股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A Notable Bear</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一只著名的熊</b></blockquote></p><p> While not a direct seller of shares, Dr. Michael Burry—famed for hisshortposition against subprime mortgage bonds—has announced in Scion Asset Management's 13F the purchase of additional Put Options against Tesla. Scion Asset management has held a bearish Put Option against Tesla since Q1 2021. The aforementioned Put Options — representing 35% of Scion's portfolio and a current market value of ~$731 million— are Scion's largest positions.</p><p><blockquote>虽然不是股票的直接卖家,但以次级抵押贷款债券空头头寸而闻名的 Michael Burry 博士在 Scion Asset Management 的 13F 中宣布购买针对特斯拉的额外看跌期权。Scion Asset management 自 2021 年第一季度以来一直持有看跌特斯拉的看跌看跌期权。上述看跌期权占 Scion 投资组合的 35%,当前市值约为 7.31 亿美元,是 Scion 最大的头寸。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Stock Sells off While Institutions Continue to Buy.<blockquote>特斯拉股票遭到抛售,而机构继续买入。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Stock Sells off While Institutions Continue to Buy.<blockquote>特斯拉股票遭到抛售,而机构继续买入。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-18 08:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla stock has tumbled almost 10% off recent highs but institutions are continuing to buy.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价已较近期高点下跌近 10%,但机构仍在继续买入。</blockquote></p><p> In a market filled with liquidity, the \"buy the dip mentality\" continues to persist. This appears to be true with Tesla stock and institutions.</p><p><blockquote>在流动性充裕的市场中,“逢低买入心态”继续挥之不去。特斯拉股票和机构似乎确实如此。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Demand for Shares Increases in Q3</b></p><p><blockquote><b>第三季度股票需求增加</b></blockquote></p><p> Q3 has been on pace to be the first quarter since Q4 2020 to have an overall net inflow of Tesla stock into institutions—those with at least $100 million under management. Currently, there is a net inflow of $7 billion of Tesla stock into institutions. 13F filings were due August 15th to show any quarter-over-quarter changes in Q2, however, institutions can continue to update positions throughout the third quarter.</p><p><blockquote>第三季度有望成为自2020年第四季度以来第一个特斯拉股票整体净流入机构的季度,这些机构管理着至少1亿美元。目前,有70亿美元的特斯拉股票净流入机构。13F 文件将于 8 月 15 日提交,以显示第二季度的任何环比变化,但是,机构可以在整个第三季度继续更新头寸。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/373bcfeda661a3fdddb1ad430c075270\" tg-width=\"683\" tg-height=\"604\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>via: marketbeat.com</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>来源:marketbeat.com</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Of those \"buying the dip\" the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, increased their position 617% quarter-over-quarter for a total of 330,196 shares. While this accounts for a small position in the under management for CPPIB, others have made Tesla a larger portion of their portfolio. Australia-based Hyperion Asset Management has also increased its Tesla stock position by over 20%. As a result of the additional shares, Tesla stock is now over 15% of Hyperions portfolio demonstrating more conviction than Cathie Wood'sARKKwith a ~10% allocation to Tesla stock.</p><p><blockquote>在那些“逢低买入”的人中,加拿大养老金计划投资委员会(Canada Pension Plan Investment Board)的持仓环比增加了617%,总计330,196股。虽然这在 CPPIB 的管理层中所占比例很小,但其他公司已将特斯拉纳入其投资组合的更大一部分。总部位于澳大利亚的 Hyperion Asset Management 也将其特斯拉股票头寸增加了 20% 以上。由于增发了股票,特斯拉股票现在占Hyperions投资组合的15%以上,比Cathie Wood的Sarkk更有信心,将约10%的股票配置给了特斯拉股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A Notable Bear</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一只著名的熊</b></blockquote></p><p> While not a direct seller of shares, Dr. Michael Burry—famed for hisshortposition against subprime mortgage bonds—has announced in Scion Asset Management's 13F the purchase of additional Put Options against Tesla. Scion Asset management has held a bearish Put Option against Tesla since Q1 2021. The aforementioned Put Options — representing 35% of Scion's portfolio and a current market value of ~$731 million— are Scion's largest positions.</p><p><blockquote>虽然不是股票的直接卖家,但以次级抵押贷款债券空头头寸而闻名的 Michael Burry 博士在 Scion Asset Management 的 13F 中宣布购买针对特斯拉的额外看跌期权。Scion Asset management 自 2021 年第一季度以来一直持有看跌特斯拉的看跌看跌期权。上述看跌期权占 Scion 投资组合的 35%,当前市值约为 7.31 亿美元,是 Scion 最大的头寸。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/tesla/news/institutions-continue-to-buy-q3\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/tesla/news/institutions-continue-to-buy-q3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189114396","content_text":"Tesla stock has tumbled almost 10% off recent highs but institutions are continuing to buy.\nIn a market filled with liquidity, the \"buy the dip mentality\" continues to persist. This appears to be true with Tesla stock and institutions.\nDemand for Shares Increases in Q3\nQ3 has been on pace to be the first quarter since Q4 2020 to have an overall net inflow of Tesla stock into institutions—those with at least $100 million under management. Currently, there is a net inflow of $7 billion of Tesla stock into institutions. 13F filings were due August 15th to show any quarter-over-quarter changes in Q2, however, institutions can continue to update positions throughout the third quarter.\nvia: marketbeat.com\nOf those \"buying the dip\" the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, increased their position 617% quarter-over-quarter for a total of 330,196 shares. While this accounts for a small position in the under management for CPPIB, others have made Tesla a larger portion of their portfolio. Australia-based Hyperion Asset Management has also increased its Tesla stock position by over 20%. As a result of the additional shares, Tesla stock is now over 15% of Hyperions portfolio demonstrating more conviction than Cathie Wood'sARKKwith a ~10% allocation to Tesla stock.\nA Notable Bear\nWhile not a direct seller of shares, Dr. Michael Burry—famed for hisshortposition against subprime mortgage bonds—has announced in Scion Asset Management's 13F the purchase of additional Put Options against Tesla. Scion Asset management has held a bearish Put Option against Tesla since Q1 2021. The aforementioned Put Options — representing 35% of Scion's portfolio and a current market value of ~$731 million— are Scion's largest positions.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":947,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830256068,"gmtCreate":1629077363054,"gmtModify":1631888314616,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Pls like my comment. Thanks!","listText":"Pls like my comment. Thanks!","text":"Pls like my comment. Thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830256068","repostId":"1100841503","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":749,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897198679,"gmtCreate":1628897891791,"gmtModify":1631889148292,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"A whole world (to 🌒) with Disney! Pls like. Thanks","listText":"A whole world (to 🌒) with Disney! Pls like. Thanks","text":"A whole world (to 🌒) with Disney! Pls like. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897198679","repostId":"2159215280","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1016,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894694071,"gmtCreate":1628820180993,"gmtModify":1631889148295,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"We are Venom","listText":"We are Venom","text":"We are Venom","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894694071","repostId":"1106453071","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106453071","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628819127,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1106453071?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-13 09:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sony delays release of ‘Venom’ sequel amid delta surge<blockquote>索尼推迟《毒液》续集上映,原因是三角洲疫情激增</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106453071","media":"Market Watch","summary":"3-week delay suggests studio believes current surge will be brief.\nNEW YORK — In the biggest sign ye","content":"<p><i>3-week delay suggests studio believes current surge will be brief.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>三周的延迟表明工作室认为当前的激增将是短暂的。</i></blockquote></p><p> NEW YORK — In the biggest sign yet that Hollywood’s fall plans are being altered by the coronavirus surge driven by the delta variant, Sony Pictures on Thursday delayed the release of the big-budget sequel “Venom: Let There Be Carnage.”</p><p><blockquote>纽约--索尼影业(Sony Pictures)周四推迟了大制作续集《毒液》(Venom: Let There Be Carnage)的上映,这是迄今为止好莱坞秋季计划因德尔塔变异毒株引发的冠状病毒激增而改变的最大迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Instead of opening in theaters Sept. 24, the “Venom” sequel will now debut Oct. 15. The film, starring Tom Hardy, had already been delayed numerous times during earlier stages of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>《毒液》续集将于 10 月 15 日上映,而不是 9 月 24 日上映。这部由汤姆·哈迪主演的电影在疫情的早期阶段已经被推迟了无数次。</blockquote></p><p> But after constant turmoil, the fall movie calendar has stayed relatively calm until recently. Last week, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIAC\">Viacom CBS</a> Paramount Pictures postponed the release of “Clifford the Big Red Dog,” citing the delta variant.</p><p><blockquote>但在经历了不断的动荡之后,秋季电影档期一直保持相对平静,直到最近。上周,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIAC\">维亚康姆CBS</a>派拉蒙影业公司以德尔塔变异毒株为由推迟了《大红狗克利福德》的上映。</blockquote></p><p> What “Venom” and “Clifford” have in common is that they’re planned as theater-only releases. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONY\">Sony</a> doesn’t have a major streaming platform the way <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&T Inc</a>'s Warner Bros. do. Those studios have been relaying partly on subscription boosts or digital rentals to offset lost box office. The original “Venom” earned $856 million globally in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>《毒液》和《克利福德》的共同之处在于,它们都计划只在影院上映。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONY\">索尼</a>没有主要的流媒体平台<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">华特·迪士尼</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">美国电话电报公司</a>华纳兄弟有。这些电影公司一直部分依靠订阅增长或数字租赁来抵消票房损失。原版《毒液》2018 年全球票房为 8.56 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> After ramping-up ticket sales, the box office has turned south in recent weeks. After Disney’s “Jungle Cruise” underperformed in late July, Warner Bros.’ “The Suicide Squad” opened with an underwhelming $26.2 million last weekend. Analysts have said the delta variant is keeping many moviegoers home.</p><p><blockquote>在增加门票销售后,最近几周票房转向南方。继迪士尼的《丛林巡游》在 7 月下旬表现不佳之后,华纳兄弟的《自杀小队》上周末首映票房却低于 2620 万美元。分析人士表示,德尔塔变异毒株让许多电影观众呆在家里。</blockquote></p><p> But the “Venom” delay — relatively short compared to the postponements of last year — also suggests the film industry is banking on the current surge fading quickly. This weekend, Disney will release the 20th Century Fox production “Free Guy,” with Ryan Reynolds, only in theaters.</p><p><blockquote>但《毒液》的延期--与去年的延期相比相对较短--也表明电影业寄希望于目前的热潮会很快消退。本周末,迪士尼将在影院上映由瑞安-雷诺兹主演的 20 世纪福克斯公司制作的《自由人》。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1616996754749","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sony delays release of ‘Venom’ sequel amid delta surge<blockquote>索尼推迟《毒液》续集上映,原因是三角洲疫情激增</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSony delays release of ‘Venom’ sequel amid delta surge<blockquote>索尼推迟《毒液》续集上映,原因是三角洲疫情激增</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Market Watch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-13 09:45</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><i>3-week delay suggests studio believes current surge will be brief.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>三周的延迟表明工作室认为当前的激增将是短暂的。</i></blockquote></p><p> NEW YORK — In the biggest sign yet that Hollywood’s fall plans are being altered by the coronavirus surge driven by the delta variant, Sony Pictures on Thursday delayed the release of the big-budget sequel “Venom: Let There Be Carnage.”</p><p><blockquote>纽约--索尼影业(Sony Pictures)周四推迟了大制作续集《毒液》(Venom: Let There Be Carnage)的上映,这是迄今为止好莱坞秋季计划因德尔塔变异毒株引发的冠状病毒激增而改变的最大迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Instead of opening in theaters Sept. 24, the “Venom” sequel will now debut Oct. 15. The film, starring Tom Hardy, had already been delayed numerous times during earlier stages of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>《毒液》续集将于 10 月 15 日上映,而不是 9 月 24 日上映。这部由汤姆·哈迪主演的电影在疫情的早期阶段已经被推迟了无数次。</blockquote></p><p> But after constant turmoil, the fall movie calendar has stayed relatively calm until recently. Last week, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIAC\">Viacom CBS</a> Paramount Pictures postponed the release of “Clifford the Big Red Dog,” citing the delta variant.</p><p><blockquote>但在经历了不断的动荡之后,秋季电影档期一直保持相对平静,直到最近。上周,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIAC\">维亚康姆CBS</a>派拉蒙影业公司以德尔塔变异毒株为由推迟了《大红狗克利福德》的上映。</blockquote></p><p> What “Venom” and “Clifford” have in common is that they’re planned as theater-only releases. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONY\">Sony</a> doesn’t have a major streaming platform the way <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">AT&T Inc</a>'s Warner Bros. do. Those studios have been relaying partly on subscription boosts or digital rentals to offset lost box office. The original “Venom” earned $856 million globally in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>《毒液》和《克利福德》的共同之处在于,它们都计划只在影院上映。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONY\">索尼</a>没有主要的流媒体平台<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">华特·迪士尼</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">美国电话电报公司</a>华纳兄弟有。这些电影公司一直部分依靠订阅增长或数字租赁来抵消票房损失。原版《毒液》2018 年全球票房为 8.56 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> After ramping-up ticket sales, the box office has turned south in recent weeks. After Disney’s “Jungle Cruise” underperformed in late July, Warner Bros.’ “The Suicide Squad” opened with an underwhelming $26.2 million last weekend. Analysts have said the delta variant is keeping many moviegoers home.</p><p><blockquote>在增加门票销售后,最近几周票房转向南方。继迪士尼的《丛林巡游》在 7 月下旬表现不佳之后,华纳兄弟的《自杀小队》上周末首映票房却低于 2620 万美元。分析人士表示,德尔塔变异毒株让许多电影观众呆在家里。</blockquote></p><p> But the “Venom” delay — relatively short compared to the postponements of last year — also suggests the film industry is banking on the current surge fading quickly. This weekend, Disney will release the 20th Century Fox production “Free Guy,” with Ryan Reynolds, only in theaters.</p><p><blockquote>但《毒液》的延期--与去年的延期相比相对较短--也表明电影业寄希望于目前的热潮会很快消退。本周末,迪士尼将在影院上映由瑞安-雷诺兹主演的 20 世纪福克斯公司制作的《自由人》。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sony-delays-release-of-venom-sequel-amid-delta-surge-01628800740?mod=home-page\">Market Watch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SONY":"索尼"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sony-delays-release-of-venom-sequel-amid-delta-surge-01628800740?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106453071","content_text":"3-week delay suggests studio believes current surge will be brief.\nNEW YORK — In the biggest sign yet that Hollywood’s fall plans are being altered by the coronavirus surge driven by the delta variant, Sony Pictures on Thursday delayed the release of the big-budget sequel “Venom: Let There Be Carnage.”\nInstead of opening in theaters Sept. 24, the “Venom” sequel will now debut Oct. 15. The film, starring Tom Hardy, had already been delayed numerous times during earlier stages of the pandemic.\nBut after constant turmoil, the fall movie calendar has stayed relatively calm until recently. Last week, Viacom CBS Paramount Pictures postponed the release of “Clifford the Big Red Dog,” citing the delta variant.\nWhat “Venom” and “Clifford” have in common is that they’re planned as theater-only releases. Sony doesn’t have a major streaming platform the way Walt Disney and AT&T Inc's Warner Bros. do. Those studios have been relaying partly on subscription boosts or digital rentals to offset lost box office. The original “Venom” earned $856 million globally in 2018.\nAfter ramping-up ticket sales, the box office has turned south in recent weeks. After Disney’s “Jungle Cruise” underperformed in late July, Warner Bros.’ “The Suicide Squad” opened with an underwhelming $26.2 million last weekend. Analysts have said the delta variant is keeping many moviegoers home.\nBut the “Venom” delay — relatively short compared to the postponements of last year — also suggests the film industry is banking on the current surge fading quickly. This weekend, Disney will release the 20th Century Fox production “Free Guy,” with Ryan Reynolds, only in theaters.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SONY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1012,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894695915,"gmtCreate":1628820147237,"gmtModify":1631888314568,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Buy when fear! Pls like my post.thank!!","listText":"Buy when fear! Pls like my post.thank!!","text":"Buy when fear! Pls like my post.thank!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894695915","repostId":"2158225219","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":783,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":895143804,"gmtCreate":1628730527008,"gmtModify":1631888314757,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"In uncle Biden i trust!!! Pls like. Thanks","listText":"In uncle Biden i trust!!! Pls like. Thanks","text":"In uncle Biden i trust!!! Pls like. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/895143804","repostId":"2158192233","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":712,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892887159,"gmtCreate":1628648325771,"gmtModify":1631888314577,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Amc to the moon pls like my post","listText":"Amc to the moon pls like my post","text":"Amc to the moon pls like my post","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892887159","repostId":"1110343727","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892884129,"gmtCreate":1628648305061,"gmtModify":1631884790530,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","listText":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","text":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892884129","repostId":"2158343470","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1079,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896150547,"gmtCreate":1628563123289,"gmtModify":1631888314539,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Great news! Pls like my comment Thanks!","listText":"Great news! Pls like my comment Thanks!","text":"Great news! Pls like my comment Thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896150547","repostId":"1196813173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":877,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891730697,"gmtCreate":1628425289719,"gmtModify":1631884870461,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good company Xiaomi. Asia pride!","listText":"Good company Xiaomi. Asia pride!","text":"Good company Xiaomi. Asia pride!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891730697","repostId":"2157549076","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2157549076","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628410500,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2157549076?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-08 16:15","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"小米:难以坐稳的世界第一","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157549076","media":"创业邦","summary":"三星和苹果分别以15.7%和14.3%的市场份额屈居第二和第三位。就在前不久,小米也拿下了欧洲市场占比第一和全球销量第二的好成绩,恐怖的增长速度不但超越了苹果,甚至可能会影响到常年稳坐第一的三星。没那么简单在天时地利人和的市场,小米已经成为了一匹最大的黑马,去年成为世界第三,今年第二季度跻身世界第二,6月直接登顶全球第一,小米超越的不仅仅是三星,苹果,还有自己。","content":"<html><body><article><img src=\"https://fid-75186.picgzc.qpic.cn/20210808161605639v201zxsih3i9ihh\"/><p>编者按:本文来源创业邦专栏雷科技,创业邦经授权转载,图源:摄图网。</p><p>2014年,在世界互联网大会“中外互联网领袖高峰对话”上,主持人向<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">苹果</a>公司高级副总裁兼总法律顾问布鲁斯塞维尔发起提问:“在19日的会议上,小米科技创始人、董事长兼首席执行官雷军讲道‘5至10年后,小米会成世界第一的手机公司’,您是否感到危机?”布鲁斯答道:“说总比做容易多了。”而当时的雷军这样回答:“万一实现了呢?”</p><p>有意思的是,在2021年6月份,小米真的做到了,根据权威机构Counterpoint Research发布最新数据显示,6月份小米销量全球占比为17.1%,超越<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">三星</a>和苹果,首次成为全球第一。三星和苹果分别以15.7%和14.3%的市场份额屈居第二和第三位。</p><img src=\"https://fid-75186.picgzc.qpic.cn/20210808161606805v201ibq1rmy0sg0\"/><p><strong>就在前不久,小米也拿下了欧洲市场占比第一和全球销量第二的好成绩,恐怖的增长速度不但超越了苹果,甚至可能会影响到常年稳坐第一的三星。</strong>可能有些读者会好奇,小米到底做了什么,能够在今年迎来销量大爆发?<strong>小米的成功,离不开三年布局</strong></p><p>不难发现,小米能够拿下全球第一的成绩很大一部分来自于欧洲市场的助力,当然这也源自于小米多年来在欧洲的布局。</p><img src=\"https://fid-75186.picgzc.qpic.cn/20210808161617826v201m5bqaddlevr\"/><p>2018年,小米正式进军欧洲市场,用性价比三个字在一年内跃居市场前五,但想凭此拿下市场第一的话还是欠了点火候。<strong>于是小米开始参考三星的策略,也就是通过机海战术:如果这款手机卖不动了,就马上上线新机,并借此迅速覆盖多个价位段市场,在提升销量的同时树立起自己的品牌价值。</strong></p><p><strong>当然,光凭一个机海战术最多让欧洲的消费者意识到有小米这么一个品牌,想要真正提升销量,最直接的办法还是大力发展销售渠道。</strong></p><p>互联网出身的小米,显然深知这一点,2018年刚进军欧洲市场时,小米就与李嘉诚旗下的香港长江和记集团进行了合作,在17700家门店销售小米设备,最初将在奥地利、丹麦、香港、爱尔兰、意大利、瑞典和英国的3集团的店铺,以及分别在香港、爱尔兰、英国和荷兰的丰泽、Superdrug和Kruidvat店铺推出。</p><p>为进一步巩固自己在线下的地位,小米又与欧洲本地的<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VOD\">沃达丰</a>等本地运营商达成深度合作,要知道海外市场的核心<span>出货</span>渠道就是运营商。</p><p>最后,小米也没有忘记电商这个渠道,截至2020年11月24日,除开印度的海外市场,小米在线上的出货量超过了1000万台,并且随着海外市场的不断恶化,电商渠道将越来越受到重视。</p><p>以上,小米在线下零售、运营商和电商三大市场形成全面覆盖之势,形成三位一体的完整销售渠道。再加上前文提到的机海战术,迅速拓展市场,让其他手机厂商们都没有反应的时间。</p><p><strong>虽然从数据报告来看,小米已经以17.1%的市场份额将苹果三星甩在身后,但这个成绩能否继续保持下去,还有不少难点。</strong><strong>三星苹果放缓,小米持续上升</strong></p><p><strong>除开小米自己进步神速的因素外,三星苹果等大牌厂商也为小米登顶起到铺垫作用。</strong></p><p>首先小米通过机海战术的策略,弥补了三星和苹果在某些价位段的空白,比如Redmi Note 10系列、Redmi 9系列这类产品在海外市场完全没有竞争对手,同时也更加符合当地的主流消费观念,其销量普遍都在千万级别以上。Redmi Note系列累计销量突破了2亿台,直接成为小米在海外的一张名片。</p><p>然后由于某些众所周知的原因,导致手机芯片短缺,三星越南工厂的产能也迅速下滑,不得不大幅减少出货量。并且这一情况可能还会影响到三星在第三季度的成绩,因此目前的三星看着迅速崛起的小米,也是有心无力。</p><p>至于苹果,由于它的发力点十分依赖新机发布,上半年又没有推出新产品,因此在小雷看来,就算苹果能够准时在9月推出iPhone 13系列,也很难在第三季度反超小米。而第四季度将会是苹果的爆发期,届时小米能否保住全球第一或第二的位置,还得看小米自己的发展。</p><p>从目前的市场来看,不出意外的话,小米这个全球第一的位置应该还能多坐一两个月,毕竟在去年小米就开始疯狂囤货,好让自己不会出现无“芯”可用的尴尬局面。<strong>再加上欧洲市场的份额不断升高,这场没有硝烟的战争小米想输都难。</strong><strong>想稳坐第一?没那么简单</strong></p><p>在天时地利人和的市场,小米已经成为了一匹最大的黑马,去年成为世界第三,今年第二季度跻身世界第二,6月直接登顶全球第一,小米超越的不仅仅是三星,苹果,还有自己。</p><p>不过小米的问题依旧存在,虽然能够在中低端市场叱咤风云,但在高端市场,小米仍未溅起多大的水花,想要坐稳第一,高端产品必不可少。目前来看,小米11 Ultra以及小米FOLD折叠屏已经具备一定的高端旗舰产品竞争力了。<strong>但是还远远不够,小米还需要不断提升自研实力。</strong></p><p>并且在核心技术方面也需要提升,虽说之前用在MIX Fold上的那枚澎湃ISP芯片并不像麒麟芯片一样强大,但这也算是小米开启自研之路的一个信号。</p><p>据市场消息,2019年小米曾投入70亿元人民币搞研发,但这与三星、苹果动辄上百亿美元的“大手笔”比起来,多少有些杯水车薪。如果小米真想打破网友眼中“组装厂”的印象,就要花更多的人力和财力在自研的道路上不断前行。</p><p><strong>未来的发展依靠的是技术以及核心竞争力,如果没有这些,小米可能也就停在这里就开始往下降了。</strong></p><p>最后还是那句话,小米在品牌营销方面真的该丢掉以前那套接地气的宣传方式了,只有让营销高端化、产品化,才能让消费者意识到小米已经不再是那个兜里只有性价比三个字的小米,自然也不会对小米的高端产品报多少信心。<strong>结语:</strong></p><p>其实小米的对手不只是三星苹果,比如OPPO以及它的子品牌realme近两年也在急速增长,在2021年第二季度OPPO和realme在欧洲市场出货量分别达到280万台、190万台,市场份额增长5.6%和3.8%,两者合计出货量达到了9.4%,虽然不高,但这两家企业的起步时间要比小米晚很多。</p><img src=\"https://fid-75186.picgzc.qpic.cn/20210808161618781v201os22iwbpfah\"/><p>这意味未来的欧洲乃至整个世界的手机市场,依然会是中国手机厂商之间的战争。</p><p>本文为专栏作者授权创业邦发表,版权归原作者所有。文章系作者个人观点,不代表创业邦立场,转载请联系原作者。如有任何疑问,请联系editor@cyzone.cn。</p></article></body></html>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>小米:难以坐稳的世界第一</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n小米:难以坐稳的世界第一\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-08 16:15 北京时间 <a href=http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202108081616207c2b18e7&s=b><strong>创业邦</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>编者按:本文来源创业邦专栏雷科技,创业邦经授权转载,图源:摄图网。2014年,在世界互联网大会“中外互联网领袖高峰对话”上,主持人向苹果公司高级副总裁兼总法律顾问布鲁斯塞维尔发起提问:“在19日的会议上,小米科技创始人、董事长兼首席执行官雷军讲道‘5至10年后,小米会成世界第一的手机公司’,您是否感到危机?”布鲁斯答道:“说总比做容易多了。”而当时的雷军这样回答:“万一实现了呢?”有意思的是,在...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202108081616207c2b18e7&s=b\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb44f0df3fb7312ee913474e800cc495","relate_stocks":{"01810":"小米集团-W"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202108081616207c2b18e7&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2157549076","content_text":"编者按:本文来源创业邦专栏雷科技,创业邦经授权转载,图源:摄图网。2014年,在世界互联网大会“中外互联网领袖高峰对话”上,主持人向苹果公司高级副总裁兼总法律顾问布鲁斯塞维尔发起提问:“在19日的会议上,小米科技创始人、董事长兼首席执行官雷军讲道‘5至10年后,小米会成世界第一的手机公司’,您是否感到危机?”布鲁斯答道:“说总比做容易多了。”而当时的雷军这样回答:“万一实现了呢?”有意思的是,在2021年6月份,小米真的做到了,根据权威机构Counterpoint Research发布最新数据显示,6月份小米销量全球占比为17.1%,超越三星和苹果,首次成为全球第一。三星和苹果分别以15.7%和14.3%的市场份额屈居第二和第三位。就在前不久,小米也拿下了欧洲市场占比第一和全球销量第二的好成绩,恐怖的增长速度不但超越了苹果,甚至可能会影响到常年稳坐第一的三星。可能有些读者会好奇,小米到底做了什么,能够在今年迎来销量大爆发?小米的成功,离不开三年布局不难发现,小米能够拿下全球第一的成绩很大一部分来自于欧洲市场的助力,当然这也源自于小米多年来在欧洲的布局。2018年,小米正式进军欧洲市场,用性价比三个字在一年内跃居市场前五,但想凭此拿下市场第一的话还是欠了点火候。于是小米开始参考三星的策略,也就是通过机海战术:如果这款手机卖不动了,就马上上线新机,并借此迅速覆盖多个价位段市场,在提升销量的同时树立起自己的品牌价值。当然,光凭一个机海战术最多让欧洲的消费者意识到有小米这么一个品牌,想要真正提升销量,最直接的办法还是大力发展销售渠道。互联网出身的小米,显然深知这一点,2018年刚进军欧洲市场时,小米就与李嘉诚旗下的香港长江和记集团进行了合作,在17700家门店销售小米设备,最初将在奥地利、丹麦、香港、爱尔兰、意大利、瑞典和英国的3集团的店铺,以及分别在香港、爱尔兰、英国和荷兰的丰泽、Superdrug和Kruidvat店铺推出。为进一步巩固自己在线下的地位,小米又与欧洲本地的沃达丰等本地运营商达成深度合作,要知道海外市场的核心出货渠道就是运营商。最后,小米也没有忘记电商这个渠道,截至2020年11月24日,除开印度的海外市场,小米在线上的出货量超过了1000万台,并且随着海外市场的不断恶化,电商渠道将越来越受到重视。以上,小米在线下零售、运营商和电商三大市场形成全面覆盖之势,形成三位一体的完整销售渠道。再加上前文提到的机海战术,迅速拓展市场,让其他手机厂商们都没有反应的时间。虽然从数据报告来看,小米已经以17.1%的市场份额将苹果三星甩在身后,但这个成绩能否继续保持下去,还有不少难点。三星苹果放缓,小米持续上升除开小米自己进步神速的因素外,三星苹果等大牌厂商也为小米登顶起到铺垫作用。首先小米通过机海战术的策略,弥补了三星和苹果在某些价位段的空白,比如Redmi Note 10系列、Redmi 9系列这类产品在海外市场完全没有竞争对手,同时也更加符合当地的主流消费观念,其销量普遍都在千万级别以上。Redmi Note系列累计销量突破了2亿台,直接成为小米在海外的一张名片。然后由于某些众所周知的原因,导致手机芯片短缺,三星越南工厂的产能也迅速下滑,不得不大幅减少出货量。并且这一情况可能还会影响到三星在第三季度的成绩,因此目前的三星看着迅速崛起的小米,也是有心无力。至于苹果,由于它的发力点十分依赖新机发布,上半年又没有推出新产品,因此在小雷看来,就算苹果能够准时在9月推出iPhone 13系列,也很难在第三季度反超小米。而第四季度将会是苹果的爆发期,届时小米能否保住全球第一或第二的位置,还得看小米自己的发展。从目前的市场来看,不出意外的话,小米这个全球第一的位置应该还能多坐一两个月,毕竟在去年小米就开始疯狂囤货,好让自己不会出现无“芯”可用的尴尬局面。再加上欧洲市场的份额不断升高,这场没有硝烟的战争小米想输都难。想稳坐第一?没那么简单在天时地利人和的市场,小米已经成为了一匹最大的黑马,去年成为世界第三,今年第二季度跻身世界第二,6月直接登顶全球第一,小米超越的不仅仅是三星,苹果,还有自己。不过小米的问题依旧存在,虽然能够在中低端市场叱咤风云,但在高端市场,小米仍未溅起多大的水花,想要坐稳第一,高端产品必不可少。目前来看,小米11 Ultra以及小米FOLD折叠屏已经具备一定的高端旗舰产品竞争力了。但是还远远不够,小米还需要不断提升自研实力。并且在核心技术方面也需要提升,虽说之前用在MIX Fold上的那枚澎湃ISP芯片并不像麒麟芯片一样强大,但这也算是小米开启自研之路的一个信号。据市场消息,2019年小米曾投入70亿元人民币搞研发,但这与三星、苹果动辄上百亿美元的“大手笔”比起来,多少有些杯水车薪。如果小米真想打破网友眼中“组装厂”的印象,就要花更多的人力和财力在自研的道路上不断前行。未来的发展依靠的是技术以及核心竞争力,如果没有这些,小米可能也就停在这里就开始往下降了。最后还是那句话,小米在品牌营销方面真的该丢掉以前那套接地气的宣传方式了,只有让营销高端化、产品化,才能让消费者意识到小米已经不再是那个兜里只有性价比三个字的小米,自然也不会对小米的高端产品报多少信心。结语:其实小米的对手不只是三星苹果,比如OPPO以及它的子品牌realme近两年也在急速增长,在2021年第二季度OPPO和realme在欧洲市场出货量分别达到280万台、190万台,市场份额增长5.6%和3.8%,两者合计出货量达到了9.4%,虽然不高,但这两家企业的起步时间要比小米晚很多。这意味未来的欧洲乃至整个世界的手机市场,依然会是中国手机厂商之间的战争。本文为专栏作者授权创业邦发表,版权归原作者所有。文章系作者个人观点,不代表创业邦立场,转载请联系原作者。如有任何疑问,请联系editor@cyzone.cn。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"48652":0.6,"48657":0.6,"48708":0.6,"48730":0.6,"48736":0.6,"48754":0.6,"01810":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":819,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":836405053,"gmtCreate":1629511757172,"gmtModify":1631888314525,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Pls like my post. Thanks.","listText":"Pls like my post. Thanks.","text":"Pls like my post. Thanks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836405053","repostId":"1151608193","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151608193","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629728324,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1151608193?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-23 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151608193","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.\nISTOCKPHOTO\nIn the rolling correcti","content":"<p><b>The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%。</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b24e4a76a5d1cd0ff030cf1b0eeac0f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.</p><p><blockquote>在股市的滚动调整中,芯片制造商受到的打击比大多数制造商都要大。</blockquote></p><p> The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.</p><p><blockquote>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%,而标准普尔 500 指数、纳斯达克综合指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的跌幅为 2% 或更少。</blockquote></p><p> Does that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.</p><p><blockquote>这是否意味着芯片股票值得买入?或者,这个历史上具有周期性的行业是否故技重施,陷入持续下跌趋势,让你大吃一惊。</blockquote></p><p> A lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”</p><p><blockquote>很大程度上取决于您的时间表,但如果您喜欢持有股票多年,而不是租用几天,那么该集团值得购买。主要原因: “这次不一样”。</blockquote></p><p> Those are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.</p><p><blockquote>这些无疑是投资中最可怕的词语之一。但芯片行业已经发生了很大的变化,现在确实不同了——这表明它不太可能压垮你。</blockquote></p><p> You’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为没有风险,那你就是个傻瓜。我会回顾一下这些。但首先,以下是该集团现在 “更安全 ”的三个主要原因--以及我在过去几天里与六位行业专家交谈过的六位行业专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.周期性的邪恶女巫死了</b></blockquote></p><p> “Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a> PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.</p><p><blockquote>“Impax Asset Management 的投资组合经理 David Winborne 说:”受产品周期的驱动,芯片行业的需求总是时好时坏。“<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">第一</a>电脑,然后是服务器,然后是电话。”但他表示,现在整个经济对芯片的需求已经扩大,因此长期增长故事更可预测。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">Just</a> look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a>, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">刚刚</a>看看你周围。由于我们的生活和工作日益 “数字化 ”,终端市场需求从各个角度都更加多样化。把远程办公服务想象成<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">缩放</a>看好该集团的 Gabelli Funds 投资组合经理兼技术分析师 Hendi Susanto 指出,网上购物、云服务、电动汽车、5G 手机、智能工厂、大数据计算甚至洗衣机。</blockquote></p><p> “There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”</p><p><blockquote>“Motley Fool 芯片行业分析师 John Rotonti 说:”现代数字经济的任何方面都离不开半导体。“这意味着所有东西都有更多的筹码。长期需求是存在的”。</blockquote></p><p> He’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.</p><p><blockquote>他没开玩笑。威廉·布莱尔分析师格雷格·斯科拉罗预测,到2030年,芯片行业的收入将从2020年的4650亿美元翻一番,达到1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a> chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> confirmed by a majority of large customers.”</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都意味着,你听到的大范围供应短缺 “可能要到明年年底的某个时候才能得到解决”。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>芯片行业分析师 Vivek Arya。“这不仅是我们的观点,而且<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>大多数大客户都证实了这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. The players have consolidated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2、玩家巩固</b></blockquote></p><p> All up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.</p><p><blockquote>在生产链的上下游,从设计到各类设备生产商再到制造,行业参与者已经整合成罗通蒂-评级 “赢得 ”的双头垄断或垄断。</blockquote></p><p> In chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.</p><p><blockquote>在芯片设计软件中,你有Cadence Design Systems和Synopsys。在生产设备方面,公司在极紫外光刻 (EUV) 等专业领域占据主导地位,例如 ASML。制造业由台积电和三星电子主导。</blockquote></p><p> These companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司通过在他们所做的事情上做到最好,赢得了他们的利基或双寡头地位。这使得投资者对它们感兴趣。Rotonti 表示,整合还意味着参与者在定价和产能方面的行为更加理性。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Profitability has improved</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3、盈利能力有所改善</b></blockquote></p><p> This more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.</p><p><blockquote>这种更加理性的行为,加上成本削减,意味着现在的盈利能力比历史上高得多。“温伯恩说:”在过去的几年里,芯片制造的经济性有了很大的改善。现金流或 EBITDA 利润率现在通常超过 30%,而十年前则在 20% 左右。</blockquote></p><p> This has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”</p><p><blockquote>这对估值有影响。Villere & Co. 的投资组合经理拉马尔·维莱尔 (Lamar Villere) 指出,尽管芯片股票的交易市盈率约为市盈率,但它们看起来很便宜,因为它们是更好的公司。“他们并没有以泡沫倍数进行交易”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The stocks to buy</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要买的股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.</p><p><blockquote>以下是我最近核实的芯片专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>New management plays</b></p><p><blockquote><b>新管理层玩法</b></blockquote></p><p> Though Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 Thrivent 高级股票研究分析师彼得·卡拉泽里斯 (Peter Karazeris) 有理由对该集团持谨慎态度(见下文),但他特别指出了两家公司的业绩可能会因为新管理层而得到提振:高通和安森美半导体。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Both have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">ON Semiconductor</a> is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.</p><p><blockquote>两者都具有稳定的盈利能力。高通最近受到德克萨斯州恶劣天气等一次性问题的打击,导致生产中断,但该公司对5G手机趋势有很好的了解。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">半导体</a>正在将手机以外的领域扩展到汽车、工业和物联网等新领域——联网设备领域。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A data center and gaming play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>数据中心和游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> Karazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.</p><p><blockquote>Karazeris 还特别提到了 Nvidia, 由于其卓越的设计能力, Nvidia 从数据中心和游戏设备芯片需求中获得了持续提振。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Design tool companies</b></p><p><blockquote><b>设计工具公司</b></blockquote></p><p> Speaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">Synopsys</a>.</p><p><blockquote>说到设计,当高通和英伟达等公司想要设计芯片时,他们会求助于Cadence Design Systems提供的设计工具和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">概要</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Their software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.</p><p><blockquote>Motley Fool 的 Rotonti 解释说,他们基于软件的设计工具可以帮助芯片创新者为他们的芯片创建蓝图,他特别指出了这些名字。“他们不是世界上增长最快的公司,但他们的利润率很高”。他们也主宰了太空。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An EUV play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>EUV游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> To put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>为了在芯片生产的早期阶段将这些蓝图应用到硅上,台积电和三星等公司转向了ASML。它的机器使用微小的光脉冲将芯片设计模板印在硅片上,这一过程称为极紫外线光刻。“罗通蒂说:”其他人还没有想出怎么做。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说,它在供应这样做的机器方面拥有垄断地位——这对于任何想要制造领先芯片的公司来说都是必要的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.</p><p><blockquote>以下是芯片行业投资者需要关注的一些主要风险。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Oversupply</b></p><p><blockquote><b>供过于求</b></blockquote></p><p> Chip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a> wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.</p><p><blockquote>芯片生产已经政治化。美国希望在国内生产更多,这样它就不会受到中国供应链中断的影响。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">中国</a>Winborne 表示,希望到 2025 年生产其使用的芯片的 70%,高于目前的 5%。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.</p><p><blockquote>结果是,政府为促进制造业提供了大量支持,因此会有更多支持。风险是未来某个时候供应过剩。这也可能会推动芯片设备的采购,导致未来的平静,这可能会损害设备制造商的销售和利润率趋势。</blockquote></p><p> Next, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.</p><p><blockquote>接下来,像Alphabet、苹果和亚马逊这样的大型科技公司都在做自己的芯片设计,这威胁到了做同样事情的专业芯片公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">Quantum</a> computing</b></p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">量子的</a>计算机的</b></blockquote></p><p> Computers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”</p><p><blockquote>William Blair 的 Scolaro 指出,使用基于量子物理学的芯片设计而不是传统半导体架构的计算机具有卓越的性能。“虽然量子计算可能至少在未来五年内不会成为主流,但它有潜力改变从技术到医疗保健的一切。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>A disturbing signal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>干扰信号</b></blockquote></p><p> A blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.</p><p><blockquote>全球采购经理人 (PMI) 指数在 4 月份达到峰值,然后连续三个月放缓。与此同时,芯片销售持续增长。Thrivent 跟踪该指标的 Karazeris 指出,通常两者遵循相同的趋势。他将这种差异归因于库存积累,而库存积累不如真正的终端市场需求可持续。因此,他认为这种背离是芯片行业的看跌信号。</blockquote></p><p> Another cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.</p><p><blockquote>另一个警告信号来自动态随机存取存储器(DRAM)芯片定价的预测疲软。“卡拉泽里斯说:”这些通常是在周期的顶部而不是底部看到的东西。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.</p><p><blockquote>但也有可能全球采购经理人指数的放缓更多的是芯片短缺的反映,而不是短缺并非真实存在的迹象(只是库存积压)。“Leuthold 经济学家兼策略师吉姆-保尔森(Jim Paulsen)说:”这种分歧并不一定意味着芯片订单会翻盘消亡。这意味着芯片制造业必须迎头赶上。</blockquote></p><p> Ford,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.</p><p><blockquote>例如,福特刚刚宣布不得不减产是因为芯片短缺,而不是潜在需求不足。</blockquote></p><p> Paulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> cars.</p><p><blockquote>保尔森预测,由于高储蓄率、就业和收入反弹以及对大件商品被压抑的需求等因素,体面的经济增长是可持续的。如果他是对的,持续的经济实力将支撑对所有使用芯片的产品的需求,包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>汽车。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBuy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-23 22:18</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%。</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b24e4a76a5d1cd0ff030cf1b0eeac0f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.</p><p><blockquote>在股市的滚动调整中,芯片制造商受到的打击比大多数制造商都要大。</blockquote></p><p> The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.</p><p><blockquote>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%,而标准普尔 500 指数、纳斯达克综合指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的跌幅为 2% 或更少。</blockquote></p><p> Does that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.</p><p><blockquote>这是否意味着芯片股票值得买入?或者,这个历史上具有周期性的行业是否故技重施,陷入持续下跌趋势,让你大吃一惊。</blockquote></p><p> A lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”</p><p><blockquote>很大程度上取决于您的时间表,但如果您喜欢持有股票多年,而不是租用几天,那么该集团值得购买。主要原因: “这次不一样”。</blockquote></p><p> Those are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.</p><p><blockquote>这些无疑是投资中最可怕的词语之一。但芯片行业已经发生了很大的变化,现在确实不同了——这表明它不太可能压垮你。</blockquote></p><p> You’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为没有风险,那你就是个傻瓜。我会回顾一下这些。但首先,以下是该集团现在 “更安全 ”的三个主要原因--以及我在过去几天里与六位行业专家交谈过的六位行业专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.周期性的邪恶女巫死了</b></blockquote></p><p> “Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a> PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.</p><p><blockquote>“Impax Asset Management 的投资组合经理 David Winborne 说:”受产品周期的驱动,芯片行业的需求总是时好时坏。“<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">第一</a>电脑,然后是服务器,然后是电话。”但他表示,现在整个经济对芯片的需求已经扩大,因此长期增长故事更可预测。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">Just</a> look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a>, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">刚刚</a>看看你周围。由于我们的生活和工作日益 “数字化 ”,终端市场需求从各个角度都更加多样化。把远程办公服务想象成<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">缩放</a>看好该集团的 Gabelli Funds 投资组合经理兼技术分析师 Hendi Susanto 指出,网上购物、云服务、电动汽车、5G 手机、智能工厂、大数据计算甚至洗衣机。</blockquote></p><p> “There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”</p><p><blockquote>“Motley Fool 芯片行业分析师 John Rotonti 说:”现代数字经济的任何方面都离不开半导体。“这意味着所有东西都有更多的筹码。长期需求是存在的”。</blockquote></p><p> He’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.</p><p><blockquote>他没开玩笑。威廉·布莱尔分析师格雷格·斯科拉罗预测,到2030年,芯片行业的收入将从2020年的4650亿美元翻一番,达到1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a> chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> confirmed by a majority of large customers.”</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都意味着,你听到的大范围供应短缺 “可能要到明年年底的某个时候才能得到解决”。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>芯片行业分析师 Vivek Arya。“这不仅是我们的观点,而且<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>大多数大客户都证实了这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. The players have consolidated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2、玩家巩固</b></blockquote></p><p> All up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.</p><p><blockquote>在生产链的上下游,从设计到各类设备生产商再到制造,行业参与者已经整合成罗通蒂-评级 “赢得 ”的双头垄断或垄断。</blockquote></p><p> In chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.</p><p><blockquote>在芯片设计软件中,你有Cadence Design Systems和Synopsys。在生产设备方面,公司在极紫外光刻 (EUV) 等专业领域占据主导地位,例如 ASML。制造业由台积电和三星电子主导。</blockquote></p><p> These companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司通过在他们所做的事情上做到最好,赢得了他们的利基或双寡头地位。这使得投资者对它们感兴趣。Rotonti 表示,整合还意味着参与者在定价和产能方面的行为更加理性。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Profitability has improved</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3、盈利能力有所改善</b></blockquote></p><p> This more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.</p><p><blockquote>这种更加理性的行为,加上成本削减,意味着现在的盈利能力比历史上高得多。“温伯恩说:”在过去的几年里,芯片制造的经济性有了很大的改善。现金流或 EBITDA 利润率现在通常超过 30%,而十年前则在 20% 左右。</blockquote></p><p> This has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”</p><p><blockquote>这对估值有影响。Villere & Co. 的投资组合经理拉马尔·维莱尔 (Lamar Villere) 指出,尽管芯片股票的交易市盈率约为市盈率,但它们看起来很便宜,因为它们是更好的公司。“他们并没有以泡沫倍数进行交易”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The stocks to buy</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要买的股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.</p><p><blockquote>以下是我最近核实的芯片专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>New management plays</b></p><p><blockquote><b>新管理层玩法</b></blockquote></p><p> Though Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 Thrivent 高级股票研究分析师彼得·卡拉泽里斯 (Peter Karazeris) 有理由对该集团持谨慎态度(见下文),但他特别指出了两家公司的业绩可能会因为新管理层而得到提振:高通和安森美半导体。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Both have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">ON Semiconductor</a> is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.</p><p><blockquote>两者都具有稳定的盈利能力。高通最近受到德克萨斯州恶劣天气等一次性问题的打击,导致生产中断,但该公司对5G手机趋势有很好的了解。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">半导体</a>正在将手机以外的领域扩展到汽车、工业和物联网等新领域——联网设备领域。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A data center and gaming play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>数据中心和游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> Karazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.</p><p><blockquote>Karazeris 还特别提到了 Nvidia, 由于其卓越的设计能力, Nvidia 从数据中心和游戏设备芯片需求中获得了持续提振。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Design tool companies</b></p><p><blockquote><b>设计工具公司</b></blockquote></p><p> Speaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">Synopsys</a>.</p><p><blockquote>说到设计,当高通和英伟达等公司想要设计芯片时,他们会求助于Cadence Design Systems提供的设计工具和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">概要</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Their software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.</p><p><blockquote>Motley Fool 的 Rotonti 解释说,他们基于软件的设计工具可以帮助芯片创新者为他们的芯片创建蓝图,他特别指出了这些名字。“他们不是世界上增长最快的公司,但他们的利润率很高”。他们也主宰了太空。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An EUV play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>EUV游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> To put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>为了在芯片生产的早期阶段将这些蓝图应用到硅上,台积电和三星等公司转向了ASML。它的机器使用微小的光脉冲将芯片设计模板印在硅片上,这一过程称为极紫外线光刻。“罗通蒂说:”其他人还没有想出怎么做。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说,它在供应这样做的机器方面拥有垄断地位——这对于任何想要制造领先芯片的公司来说都是必要的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.</p><p><blockquote>以下是芯片行业投资者需要关注的一些主要风险。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Oversupply</b></p><p><blockquote><b>供过于求</b></blockquote></p><p> Chip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a> wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.</p><p><blockquote>芯片生产已经政治化。美国希望在国内生产更多,这样它就不会受到中国供应链中断的影响。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">中国</a>Winborne 表示,希望到 2025 年生产其使用的芯片的 70%,高于目前的 5%。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.</p><p><blockquote>结果是,政府为促进制造业提供了大量支持,因此会有更多支持。风险是未来某个时候供应过剩。这也可能会推动芯片设备的采购,导致未来的平静,这可能会损害设备制造商的销售和利润率趋势。</blockquote></p><p> Next, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.</p><p><blockquote>接下来,像Alphabet、苹果和亚马逊这样的大型科技公司都在做自己的芯片设计,这威胁到了做同样事情的专业芯片公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">Quantum</a> computing</b></p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">量子的</a>计算机的</b></blockquote></p><p> Computers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”</p><p><blockquote>William Blair 的 Scolaro 指出,使用基于量子物理学的芯片设计而不是传统半导体架构的计算机具有卓越的性能。“虽然量子计算可能至少在未来五年内不会成为主流,但它有潜力改变从技术到医疗保健的一切。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>A disturbing signal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>干扰信号</b></blockquote></p><p> A blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.</p><p><blockquote>全球采购经理人 (PMI) 指数在 4 月份达到峰值,然后连续三个月放缓。与此同时,芯片销售持续增长。Thrivent 跟踪该指标的 Karazeris 指出,通常两者遵循相同的趋势。他将这种差异归因于库存积累,而库存积累不如真正的终端市场需求可持续。因此,他认为这种背离是芯片行业的看跌信号。</blockquote></p><p> Another cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.</p><p><blockquote>另一个警告信号来自动态随机存取存储器(DRAM)芯片定价的预测疲软。“卡拉泽里斯说:”这些通常是在周期的顶部而不是底部看到的东西。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.</p><p><blockquote>但也有可能全球采购经理人指数的放缓更多的是芯片短缺的反映,而不是短缺并非真实存在的迹象(只是库存积压)。“Leuthold 经济学家兼策略师吉姆-保尔森(Jim Paulsen)说:”这种分歧并不一定意味着芯片订单会翻盘消亡。这意味着芯片制造业必须迎头赶上。</blockquote></p><p> Ford,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.</p><p><blockquote>例如,福特刚刚宣布不得不减产是因为芯片短缺,而不是潜在需求不足。</blockquote></p><p> Paulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> cars.</p><p><blockquote>保尔森预测,由于高储蓄率、就业和收入反弹以及对大件商品被压抑的需求等因素,体面的经济增长是可持续的。如果他是对的,持续的经济实力将支撑对所有使用芯片的产品的需求,包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>汽车。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/buy-the-pullback-in-chip-stocks-and-focus-on-these-6-companies-for-the-long-haul-11629468380?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNPS":"新思科技","AAPL":"苹果","TSM":"台积电","QCOM":"高通","NVDA":"英伟达","CDNS":"铿腾电子","GOOG":"谷歌","ASML":"阿斯麦","GOOGL":"谷歌A","SSNLF":"三星电子","AMZN":"亚马逊","SOXX":"iShares费城交易所半导体ETF","ON":"安森美半导体"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/buy-the-pullback-in-chip-stocks-and-focus-on-these-6-companies-for-the-long-haul-11629468380?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151608193","content_text":"The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.\nISTOCKPHOTO\nIn the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.\nThe iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.\nDoes that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.\nA lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”\nThose are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.\nYou’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.\n1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead\n“Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “First PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.\nJust look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like Zoom, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.\n“There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”\nHe’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.\nAll of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says Bank of America chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but one confirmed by a majority of large customers.”\n2. The players have consolidated\nAll up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.\nIn chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.\nThese companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.\n3. Profitability has improved\nThis more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.\nThis has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”\nThe stocks to buy\nHere are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.\nNew management plays\nThough Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.\nBoth have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. ON Semiconductor is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.\nA data center and gaming play\nKarazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.\nDesign tool companies\nSpeaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.\nTheir software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.\nAn EUV play\nTo put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.\nIn other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.\nRisks\nHere are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.\nOversupply\nChip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. China wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.\nThe upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.\nNext, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.\nQuantum computing\nComputers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”\nA disturbing signal\nA blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.\nAnother cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.\nBut it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.\nFord,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.\nPaulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including Ford cars.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOGL":0.9,"ON":0.9,"SOXX":0.9,"ASML":0.9,"TSM":0.9,"SSNLF":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"SNPS":0.9,"NVDA":0.9,"CDNS":0.9,"QCOM":0.9,"GOOG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3450,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896150547,"gmtCreate":1628563123289,"gmtModify":1631888314539,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Great news! Pls like my comment Thanks!","listText":"Great news! Pls like my comment Thanks!","text":"Great news! Pls like my comment Thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896150547","repostId":"1196813173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":877,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894695915,"gmtCreate":1628820147237,"gmtModify":1631888314568,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Buy when fear! Pls like my post.thank!!","listText":"Buy when fear! Pls like my post.thank!!","text":"Buy when fear! Pls like my post.thank!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894695915","repostId":"2158225219","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":783,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892884129,"gmtCreate":1628648305061,"gmtModify":1631884790530,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","listText":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","text":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892884129","repostId":"2158343470","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1079,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892887159,"gmtCreate":1628648325771,"gmtModify":1631888314577,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Amc to the moon pls like my post","listText":"Amc to the moon pls like my post","text":"Amc to the moon pls like my post","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892887159","repostId":"1110343727","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819990642,"gmtCreate":1630025620286,"gmtModify":1704954750429,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Thanks for sharing. ","listText":"Thanks for sharing. ","text":"Thanks for sharing.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/819990642","repostId":"2162847016","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2032,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807519192,"gmtCreate":1628043056316,"gmtModify":1631888314602,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"All thanks to FED printers!!![微笑] ","listText":"All thanks to FED printers!!![微笑] ","text":"All thanks to FED printers!!![微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807519192","repostId":"2156312793","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":888330159,"gmtCreate":1631431985471,"gmtModify":1631888314553,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Thanks for sharing","listText":"Thanks for sharing","text":"Thanks for sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/888330159","repostId":"2166377772","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1967,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":889263504,"gmtCreate":1631151671508,"gmtModify":1631888314664,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Hold on and ride to Moon, will be 3k in years time. Thanks.","listText":"Hold on and ride to Moon, will be 3k in years time. Thanks.","text":"Hold on and ride to Moon, will be 3k in years time. Thanks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/889263504","repostId":"1109193040","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830256068,"gmtCreate":1629077363054,"gmtModify":1631888314616,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577969053537569","authorIdStr":"3577969053537569"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Pls like my comment. Thanks!","listText":"Pls like my comment. Thanks!","text":"Pls like my comment. Thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830256068","repostId":"1100841503","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":749,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}