EstherTurtle的个人主页 - 老虎社区

EstherTurtle

EstherTurtle

Hello i am Turtle. HeHE

IP属地：未知

1关注

31粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-05-21

Will coinbase go up

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-14

$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$sa sad

2021-08-13

Sad

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-16

Up ip up

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-02

Yes

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-12

Huh

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-06

Yes

Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote>

2021-07-19

Jjj

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-29

Yes

US IPO Week Ahead: DiDi makes its billion-dollar debut in a 17 IPO week<blockquote>美国IPO未来一周：滴滴在17个IPO周内首次亮相10亿美元</blockquote>

2021-06-22

Hmm

Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In "Heat-Seeking Missiles": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis<blockquote>鲍威尔刚刚发射了2万亿美元的“热寻导弹”：Zoltan解释美联储如何开启下一次回购危机</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3579566667655239","uuid":"3579566667655239","gmtCreate":1616474480033,"gmtModify":1617414258526,"name":"EstherTurtle","pinyin":"estherturtle","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"Hello i am Turtle. HeHE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":31,"headSize":1,"tweetSize":381,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.08","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":698628783,"gmtCreate":1640389385723,"gmtModify":1640389386102,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698628783","repostId":"1156159690","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2557,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":836053609,"gmtCreate":1629440429001,"gmtModify":1631884196603,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>sad sad sad sad sad sad sad","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>sad sad sad sad sad sad sad","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$sad sad sad sad sad sad sad","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31dc9a6a4bd61dfeae0f603466f230de","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836053609","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1672,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836059911,"gmtCreate":1629440311133,"gmtModify":1633684803359,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes yes yes","listText":"Yes yes yes","text":"Yes yes yes","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5e13ac04b1cce0d297f7d230428c796d","width":"1080","height":"2449"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836059911","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2893,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836050013,"gmtCreate":1629440220332,"gmtModify":1633684803826,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836050013","repostId":"1170527105","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170527105","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1629438384,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1170527105?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-20 13:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"We Asked 1,000 Apes Why They Bought Stock Or Options In AMC Entertainment<blockquote>我们询问了1000只猿为什么在AMC院线购买股票或期权</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170527105","media":"Benzinga","summary":"This week we asked over 1,000 AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc traders and investors why they bought s","content":"<p>This week we asked over 1,000&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc</b>&nbsp;traders and investors why they bought stock oroptionsin the world’s largest theatre chain.</p><p><blockquote>本周我们询问了1,000多人<b>AMC院线控股公司</b>交易员和投资者为什么购买全球最大连锁影院的股票或期权。</blockquote></p><p> <i>For the uninitiated, AMC traders and investors often refer to themselves as \"apes.\"</i></p><p><blockquote><i>对于外行人来说，AMC交易员和投资者经常称自己为“猿”。</i></blockquote></p><p> <b>What To Know:</b>It’s no secret AMC came out swinging in its recent earnings report.</p><p><blockquote><b>须知：</b>AMC在最近的收益报告中表现不佳，这已不是什么秘密。</blockquote></p><p> AMC Entertainment shares&nbsp;traded&nbsp;higher on Aug. 9 after the company reported better-than-expected second-quarter EPS and sales results. The company notably reported it&nbsp;has liquidity available in excess of $2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>AMC院线公布好于预期的第二季度每股收益和销售业绩后，该公司股价于8月9日走高。该公司特别报告称，其可用流动性超过20亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMC reported quarterly losses of 71 cents per share, which easily beat the analyst consensus estimate of a loss of 93 cents per share. AMC also reported quarterly sales of $444.7 million, which rather easily beat the analyst consensus estimate of $375.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>AMC公布季度每股亏损71美分，轻松超过分析师普遍预期的每股亏损93美分。AMC还公布季度销售额为4.447亿美元，轻松超过分析师普遍预期的3.753亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adam Aron, Chairman and CEO of AMC commented, “The second quarter of 2021 was transformational for AMC. We raised yet another $1.25 billion of new equity capital (before commissions and fees) in the quarter, boosting our quarter ending liquidity to more than $2 billion (including cash and undrawn revolving lines of credit) which is about double the previous highest ever such mark in AMC’s 101-year history.</p><p><blockquote>AMC董事长兼首席执行官Adam Aron评论道：“2021年第二季度对AMC来说是变革性的。我们在本季度又筹集了12.5亿美元的新股本（不含佣金和费用），使我们的季末流动性超过20亿美元（包括现金和未提取的循环信贷额度），这大约是AMC 101年历史上最高纪录的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What You Said:</b>It’s clear from Aron’s statements&nbsp;he cares&nbsp;about the future financial outcomes of AMC and the social impact of the brand globally. On a similar note, a number of apes told us they wanted to do their part to support a brand that’s brought families and friends together since 1920:</p><p><blockquote><b>你所说的：</b>从Aron的声明中可以清楚地看出，他关心AMC未来的财务业绩以及该品牌在全球的社会影响。同样，许多猿类告诉我们，他们希望尽自己的一份力量来支持这个自1920年以来将家人和朋友聚集在一起的品牌：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>“I have always been a fan of AMC. I enjoy going to the movies and believe brick and mortar theatres are here to stay.”</li>  <li>“I grew up going to AMC with my friends and wouldn’t have had it any other way.”</li>  <li>“I own a family restaurant. I believe AMC represents a lot of what we represent: bringing families &amp; friends together.”</li>  <li>“I’ve struggled so much through COVID-19. When I heard about the WallStreetBets community pulling together to help AMC while larger, bigger money corporations were betting on them to fail, I wanted to help. Though I haven’t got a lot to help with, I wanted to do what I could. I kept thinking “what if people were betting against me and my little family restaurant.\"</li> </ul> <b>What's Next:</b>Aron concluded his statements in AMC’s second-quarter earnings release by saying, “There are many who shared our passion that moviegoing at our theatres should continue for future generations. Accordingly, we are ever so grateful to the friends and allies that AMC has gathered along the way. They can take comfort in knowing that as we rebuild our company, our deeper cash reserves allow us to stay the course, to innovate again&nbsp;and to capitalize on opportunities around us.\"</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>“我一直是AMC的粉丝。我喜欢去看电影，并相信实体影院会继续存在。”</li><li>“我是和朋友一起去AMC长大的，不会有任何其他方式。”</li><li>“我拥有一家家庭餐厅。我相信AMC代表了我们所代表的很多东西：将家人和朋友聚集在一起。”</li><li>“我在COVID-19期间一直在苦苦挣扎。当我听说WallStreetBets社区齐心协力帮助AMC，而越来越大的金融公司却押注AMC失败时，我想提供帮助。尽管我没有很多东西可以提供帮助，但我想尽我所能。我一直在想“如果人们对我和我的家庭小餐馆下注怎么办？”</li></ul><b>下一步是什么：</b>阿伦在AMC第二季度财报中总结道：“有很多人和我们一样热衷于在我们的影院看电影应该为子孙后代继续下去。因此，我们非常感谢AMC一路走来聚集的朋友和盟友。他们可以放心地知道，随着我们重建公司，我们更深的现金储备使我们能够坚持到底，再次创新并利用我们周围的机会。”</blockquote></p><p> While AMC and other reopening stocks are far from out of the woods as traders and investors weigh the spread of the COVID-19 delta variant, it’s nothing short of a miracle the theatre chain has $2 billion in liquidity, including cash and undrawn revolving lines of credit. And it’s safe to say the apes had a thing or two to do with that.</p><p><blockquote>尽管随着交易员和投资者权衡COVID-19德尔塔变异毒株的蔓延，AMC和其他重新开业的股票还远未走出困境，但这家连锁影院拥有20亿美元的流动性，包括现金和未提取的循环额度，这简直是一个奇迹。信用。可以肯定地说，类人猿与此有关。</blockquote></p><p> <i>This survey was conducted by Benzinga in August 2021 and included the responses of a diverse population of adults 18 or older.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>这项调查由Benzinga于2021年8月进行，包括18岁或以上成年人的不同人群的回答。</i></blockquote></p><p> <i>Opting into the survey was completely voluntary, with no incentives offered to potential respondents. The study reflects results from over 1,000 adults.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>选择参加调查完全是自愿的，没有向潜在的受访者提供任何激励。这项研究反映了1000多名成年人的结果。</i></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>We Asked 1,000 Apes Why They Bought Stock Or Options In AMC Entertainment<blockquote>我们询问了1000只猿为什么在AMC院线购买股票或期权</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWe Asked 1,000 Apes Why They Bought Stock Or Options In AMC Entertainment<blockquote>我们询问了1000只猿为什么在AMC院线购买股票或期权</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-20 13:46</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>This week we asked over 1,000&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc</b>&nbsp;traders and investors why they bought stock oroptionsin the world’s largest theatre chain.</p><p><blockquote>本周我们询问了1,000多人<b>AMC院线控股公司</b>交易员和投资者为什么购买全球最大连锁影院的股票或期权。</blockquote></p><p> <i>For the uninitiated, AMC traders and investors often refer to themselves as \"apes.\"</i></p><p><blockquote><i>对于外行人来说，AMC交易员和投资者经常称自己为“猿”。</i></blockquote></p><p> <b>What To Know:</b>It’s no secret AMC came out swinging in its recent earnings report.</p><p><blockquote><b>须知：</b>AMC在最近的收益报告中表现不佳，这已不是什么秘密。</blockquote></p><p> AMC Entertainment shares&nbsp;traded&nbsp;higher on Aug. 9 after the company reported better-than-expected second-quarter EPS and sales results. The company notably reported it&nbsp;has liquidity available in excess of $2 billion.</p><p><blockquote>AMC院线公布好于预期的第二季度每股收益和销售业绩后，该公司股价于8月9日走高。该公司特别报告称，其可用流动性超过20亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> AMC reported quarterly losses of 71 cents per share, which easily beat the analyst consensus estimate of a loss of 93 cents per share. AMC also reported quarterly sales of $444.7 million, which rather easily beat the analyst consensus estimate of $375.3 million.</p><p><blockquote>AMC公布季度每股亏损71美分，轻松超过分析师普遍预期的每股亏损93美分。AMC还公布季度销售额为4.447亿美元，轻松超过分析师普遍预期的3.753亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Adam Aron, Chairman and CEO of AMC commented, “The second quarter of 2021 was transformational for AMC. We raised yet another $1.25 billion of new equity capital (before commissions and fees) in the quarter, boosting our quarter ending liquidity to more than $2 billion (including cash and undrawn revolving lines of credit) which is about double the previous highest ever such mark in AMC’s 101-year history.</p><p><blockquote>AMC董事长兼首席执行官Adam Aron评论道：“2021年第二季度对AMC来说是变革性的。我们在本季度又筹集了12.5亿美元的新股本（不含佣金和费用），使我们的季末流动性超过20亿美元（包括现金和未提取的循环信贷额度），这大约是AMC 101年历史上最高纪录的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What You Said:</b>It’s clear from Aron’s statements&nbsp;he cares&nbsp;about the future financial outcomes of AMC and the social impact of the brand globally. On a similar note, a number of apes told us they wanted to do their part to support a brand that’s brought families and friends together since 1920:</p><p><blockquote><b>你所说的：</b>从Aron的声明中可以清楚地看出，他关心AMC未来的财务业绩以及该品牌在全球的社会影响。同样，许多猿类告诉我们，他们希望尽自己的一份力量来支持这个自1920年以来将家人和朋友聚集在一起的品牌：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>“I have always been a fan of AMC. I enjoy going to the movies and believe brick and mortar theatres are here to stay.”</li>  <li>“I grew up going to AMC with my friends and wouldn’t have had it any other way.”</li>  <li>“I own a family restaurant. I believe AMC represents a lot of what we represent: bringing families &amp; friends together.”</li>  <li>“I’ve struggled so much through COVID-19. When I heard about the WallStreetBets community pulling together to help AMC while larger, bigger money corporations were betting on them to fail, I wanted to help. Though I haven’t got a lot to help with, I wanted to do what I could. I kept thinking “what if people were betting against me and my little family restaurant.\"</li> </ul> <b>What's Next:</b>Aron concluded his statements in AMC’s second-quarter earnings release by saying, “There are many who shared our passion that moviegoing at our theatres should continue for future generations. Accordingly, we are ever so grateful to the friends and allies that AMC has gathered along the way. They can take comfort in knowing that as we rebuild our company, our deeper cash reserves allow us to stay the course, to innovate again&nbsp;and to capitalize on opportunities around us.\"</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>“我一直是AMC的粉丝。我喜欢去看电影，并相信实体影院会继续存在。”</li><li>“我是和朋友一起去AMC长大的，不会有任何其他方式。”</li><li>“我拥有一家家庭餐厅。我相信AMC代表了我们所代表的很多东西：将家人和朋友聚集在一起。”</li><li>“我在COVID-19期间一直在苦苦挣扎。当我听说WallStreetBets社区齐心协力帮助AMC，而越来越大的金融公司却押注AMC失败时，我想提供帮助。尽管我没有很多东西可以提供帮助，但我想尽我所能。我一直在想“如果人们对我和我的家庭小餐馆下注怎么办？”</li></ul><b>下一步是什么：</b>阿伦在AMC第二季度财报中总结道：“有很多人和我们一样热衷于在我们的影院看电影应该为子孙后代继续下去。因此，我们非常感谢AMC一路走来聚集的朋友和盟友。他们可以放心地知道，随着我们重建公司，我们更深的现金储备使我们能够坚持到底，再次创新并利用我们周围的机会。”</blockquote></p><p> While AMC and other reopening stocks are far from out of the woods as traders and investors weigh the spread of the COVID-19 delta variant, it’s nothing short of a miracle the theatre chain has $2 billion in liquidity, including cash and undrawn revolving lines of credit. And it’s safe to say the apes had a thing or two to do with that.</p><p><blockquote>尽管随着交易员和投资者权衡COVID-19德尔塔变异毒株的蔓延，AMC和其他重新开业的股票还远未走出困境，但这家连锁影院拥有20亿美元的流动性，包括现金和未提取的循环额度，这简直是一个奇迹。信用。可以肯定地说，类人猿与此有关。</blockquote></p><p> <i>This survey was conducted by Benzinga in August 2021 and included the responses of a diverse population of adults 18 or older.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>这项调查由Benzinga于2021年8月进行，包括18岁或以上成年人的不同人群的回答。</i></blockquote></p><p> <i>Opting into the survey was completely voluntary, with no incentives offered to potential respondents. The study reflects results from over 1,000 adults.</i></p><p><blockquote><i>选择参加调查完全是自愿的，没有向潜在的受访者提供任何激励。这项研究反映了1000多名成年人的结果。</i></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170527105","content_text":"This week we asked over 1,000 AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc traders and investors why they bought stock oroptionsin the world’s largest theatre chain.\nFor the uninitiated, AMC traders and investors often refer to themselves as \"apes.\"\nWhat To Know:It’s no secret AMC came out swinging in its recent earnings report.\nAMC Entertainment shares traded higher on Aug. 9 after the company reported better-than-expected second-quarter EPS and sales results. The company notably reported it has liquidity available in excess of $2 billion.\nAMC reported quarterly losses of 71 cents per share, which easily beat the analyst consensus estimate of a loss of 93 cents per share. AMC also reported quarterly sales of $444.7 million, which rather easily beat the analyst consensus estimate of $375.3 million.\nAdam Aron, Chairman and CEO of AMC commented, “The second quarter of 2021 was transformational for AMC. We raised yet another $1.25 billion of new equity capital (before commissions and fees) in the quarter, boosting our quarter ending liquidity to more than $2 billion (including cash and undrawn revolving lines of credit) which is about double the previous highest ever such mark in AMC’s 101-year history.\nWhat You Said:It’s clear from Aron’s statements he cares about the future financial outcomes of AMC and the social impact of the brand globally. On a similar note, a number of apes told us they wanted to do their part to support a brand that’s brought families and friends together since 1920:\n\n“I have always been a fan of AMC. I enjoy going to the movies and believe brick and mortar theatres are here to stay.”\n“I grew up going to AMC with my friends and wouldn’t have had it any other way.”\n“I own a family restaurant. I believe AMC represents a lot of what we represent: bringing families & friends together.”\n“I’ve struggled so much through COVID-19. When I heard about the WallStreetBets community pulling together to help AMC while larger, bigger money corporations were betting on them to fail, I wanted to help. Though I haven’t got a lot to help with, I wanted to do what I could. I kept thinking “what if people were betting against me and my little family restaurant.\"\n\nWhat's Next:Aron concluded his statements in AMC’s second-quarter earnings release by saying, “There are many who shared our passion that moviegoing at our theatres should continue for future generations. Accordingly, we are ever so grateful to the friends and allies that AMC has gathered along the way. They can take comfort in knowing that as we rebuild our company, our deeper cash reserves allow us to stay the course, to innovate again and to capitalize on opportunities around us.\"\nWhile AMC and other reopening stocks are far from out of the woods as traders and investors weigh the spread of the COVID-19 delta variant, it’s nothing short of a miracle the theatre chain has $2 billion in liquidity, including cash and undrawn revolving lines of credit. And it’s safe to say the apes had a thing or two to do with that.\nThis survey was conducted by Benzinga in August 2021 and included the responses of a diverse population of adults 18 or older.\nOpting into the survey was completely voluntary, with no incentives offered to potential respondents. The study reflects results from over 1,000 adults.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2019,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836027432,"gmtCreate":1629440198726,"gmtModify":1633684803950,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Vh","listText":"Vh","text":"Vh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836027432","repostId":"1170441014","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2722,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836027227,"gmtCreate":1629440189569,"gmtModify":1633684804074,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Vhj","listText":"Vhj","text":"Vhj","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836027227","repostId":"1192876264","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2045,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":831233032,"gmtCreate":1629329090526,"gmtModify":1631884196640,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>how long should i wait","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>how long should i wait","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$how long should i wait","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e29a7819bafc572202dfe2fb78b4a30","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/831233032","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2244,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":831239146,"gmtCreate":1629329049685,"gmtModify":1633685720352,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Down down down yuppie","listText":"Down down down yuppie","text":"Down down down yuppie","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dd72c864d7fe162dc699b4c0993944fb","width":"1080","height":"2548"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/831239146","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1903,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833671254,"gmtCreate":1629242882978,"gmtModify":1633686367749,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad sad sad","listText":"Sad sad sad","text":"Sad sad sad","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9af9d492c0209f59c29712fdd0ccf813","width":"1080","height":"2548"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833671254","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3580,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833673306,"gmtCreate":1629242838605,"gmtModify":1633686368968,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Confirmsad","listText":"Confirmsad","text":"Confirmsad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833673306","repostId":"2160883327","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2123,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833679770,"gmtCreate":1629242829190,"gmtModify":1633686369313,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Super sad","listText":"Super sad","text":"Super sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833679770","repostId":"2160783879","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1177,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833679696,"gmtCreate":1629242818615,"gmtModify":1633686369676,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad","listText":"Sad","text":"Sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833679696","repostId":"1171317704","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":813,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833670755,"gmtCreate":1629242807977,"gmtModify":1633686370041,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad","listText":"Sad","text":"Sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833670755","repostId":"1154954467","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":852,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833670122,"gmtCreate":1629242798366,"gmtModify":1633686370487,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad&nbsp;","listText":"Sad&nbsp;","text":"Sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833670122","repostId":"2160880977","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":715,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833647774,"gmtCreate":1629242776498,"gmtModify":1633686370710,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad sad","listText":"Sad sad","text":"Sad sad","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4f9fba33f04f8425a3db1783fa867d55","width":"1080","height":"2548"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833647774","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":689,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839416199,"gmtCreate":1629172865711,"gmtModify":1631884196683,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>sad sad sad","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>sad sad sad","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$sad sad sad","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdfa7da4843462fe529de58cc5b2362","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839416199","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1116,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839418072,"gmtCreate":1629172784496,"gmtModify":1633686824112,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gd","listText":"Gd","text":"Gd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839418072","repostId":"1162723925","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162723925","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629170609,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1162723925?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-17 11:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Micron Technology: Winter May Be Coming, But Not This Year... Nor The Next<blockquote>美光科技：冬天可能来了，但今年不会……也不是下一个</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162723925","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nThe Morgan Stanley downgrade of Memory chips was based on PC DRAM ASPs that represent just ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>The Morgan Stanley downgrade of Memory chips was based on PC DRAM ASPs that represent just 15% of the total DRAM demand.</li>  <li>The report addressed dropping PC sales, but failed to recognize that DRAM content per PC is increasing each year.</li>  <li>The report focuses on DRAM spot prices, instead of contract prices that make up 90% of supplier ASPs.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/72f0a26068ce9a56688977e5a0dd9578\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>borisyankov/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>摩根士丹利下调存储芯片评级是基于PC DRAM平均售价仅占DRAM总需求的15%。</li><li>该报告谈到了PC销量下降的问题，但没有认识到每台PC的DRAM内容每年都在增加。</li><li>该报告关注的是DRAM现货价格，而不是占供应商ASP 90%的合同价格。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>borisyankov/E+来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analysts downgraded Micron(NASDAQ:MU)to equal weight from overweight, in their industry report titled, “Memory - Winter Is Coming.\" MS cautioned of a coming cool down in the DRAM memory business that could lead to lower DRAM prices.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师在其行业报告《内存——冬天即将来临》中将美光（纳斯达克：MU）评级下调至与跑赢大盘同等的权重。MM警告称，DRAM内存业务即将降温，可能导致DRAM价格下降。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley noted that</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利指出，</blockquote></p><p>   “DRAM conditions are losing steam, and our inflection signposts suggest caution from here there’s been a change from mid-cycle to late cycle, and that this phase-change has historically meant a challenging backdrop for forward returns.”  Micron Technology’sstock had its worst single-day percentage decline since March 16, 2020, when it fell 19.8%. MU's stock price for the past year is shown in Chart 1, illustrating the sell-off in the past few days coupled with a drop of more than 25% since reaching a high on April 12, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>“DRAM状况正在失去动力，我们的拐点路标建议谨慎从这里开始，从周期中期到周期后期发生了变化，这种相变在历史上意味着远期回报面临着充满挑战的背景。”美光科技股价创下2020年3月16日以来最大单日百分比跌幅，当时下跌19.8%。MU过去一年的股价如图1所示，说明了过去几天的抛售以及自2021年4月12日达到高点以来下跌超过25%的情况。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ea0b20556a40eb39c18b7aa1ed295e1c\" tg-width=\"634\" tg-height=\"416\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 1</p><p><blockquote>图表1</blockquote></p><p> This article presents data that refutes the underlying case presented by Morgan Stanley that worsening DRAM demand is contributing to an acceleration of the end of the current memory upcycle leading to the start of a down cycle in 1Q 2022.</p><p><blockquote>本文提供的数据驳斥了摩根士丹利提出的基本观点，即DRAM需求的恶化正在加速当前内存上行周期的结束，导致2022年1Q下行周期的开始。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Morgan Stanley’s Misinterpretation of Data#1 Small Percentage of PC DRAM</b></p><p><blockquote><b>摩根士丹利对数据的误解#1 PC DRAM的百分比很小</b></blockquote></p><p> The first point is the emphasis by Morgan Stanley on PC DRAM price erosion as a harbinger for the downturn in the DRAM market. Why? Because PCs represent just 15% of the demand for DRAMs,as shown in Chart 2, according to our report entitled “<i>Hot ICs: A Market Analysis of Artificial Intelligence, 5G, CMOS Image Sensors, and Memory Chips.\"</i></p><p><blockquote>第一点是摩根士丹利强调PC DRAM价格侵蚀是DRAM市场低迷的先兆。为什么？因为PC仅占DRAM需求的15%，如图2所示，根据我们题为“<i>热门IC：人工智能、5G、CMOS图像传感器和存储芯片的市场分析。”</i></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b40e66f4b73b27303075791c19fe36f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chart 2</p><p><blockquote>图表2</blockquote></p><p> <b>#2 Increased DRAM content per PC</b></p><p><blockquote><b>#2每台PC的DRAM含量增加</b></blockquote></p><p> The 15% DRAM demand for PCs is hardly enough to cause a stop in the memory cycle. But that's beside the point. Morgan Stanley overlooks the fact that DRAM content per PC increases each year even if the PC market has slowed.</p><p><blockquote>PC 15%的DRAM需求几乎不足以导致内存周期的停止。但这不是重点。摩根士丹利忽略了一个事实，即即使个人电脑市场放缓，每台个人电脑的DRAM含量每年都在增加。</blockquote></p><p> Chart 3 shows that PC unit shipments between 2015 and 2023. Indeed, my forecast shows that PCs will decrease in 2022 and 2023, but the decrease is due to a normalization of PC demand following the extraordinary demand for PCs during the work/study/stay-at-home orders associated with the COVID pandemic in 2020 that carried over into 2021.</p><p><blockquote>图3显示了2015年至2023年间PC单位出货量。事实上，我的预测显示，个人电脑将在2022年和2023年下降，但这种下降是由于在与COVID疫情相关的工作/学习/居家订单期间对个人电脑的非凡需求之后，个人电脑需求正常化。2020年延续到2021年。</blockquote></p><p> Prior to 2020, the PC market was decreasing, and I anticipate a corresponding return normalcy with a decrease of a few percent per year in 2022 and 2023. I estimate that DRAM content per PC will increase from 5.5 GB in 2015 to 14 GB in 2023. That’s an increase of 2.5 times during this period.</p><p><blockquote>在2020年之前，个人电脑市场正在下降，我预计2022年和2023年相应的回报将正常化，每年下降几个百分点。我估计每台PC的DRAM内容将从2015年的5.5 GB增加到2023年的14 GB。在此期间增加了2.5倍。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5732cd4948d7209d76ccb4f7628560ab\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 3</p><p><blockquote>图表3</blockquote></p><p> Thus, although PC units will decrease, DRAM content will increase during the next two years. But factoring in the increase in DRAM content per PC, we see in Chart 4 a much different growth in DRAMs.</p><p><blockquote>因此，尽管PC单元将减少，但DRAM内容将在未来两年内增加。但是考虑到每台PC的DRAM内容的增加，我们在图4中看到DRAM的增长非常不同。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7c21d24f41f7f77bc00c62ed82b44f62\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chart 4</p><p><blockquote>图表4</blockquote></p><p> <b>#3 Spot ASPs are Different than Contract ASPs</b></p><p><blockquote><b>#3现货平均售价不同于合约平均售价</b></blockquote></p><p> Chart 5 shows DRAM data comparison for Spot ASPs vs Contract ASPs. The entire rationale for the TrendForce and Morgan Stanley reports is the drop in spot prices in 2021, and the resultant end of the current memory cycle.</p><p><blockquote>图5显示了现货ASP与合约ASP的DRAM数据比较。TrendForce和摩根士丹利报告的全部理由是2021年现货价格下跌，以及当前内存周期的结束。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b5a2774dcaff2d53edd141e0cc1e2d13\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"346\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chart 5</p><p><blockquote>图表5</blockquote></p><p> Why they chose the drop in spot prices as the catalyst for the end of the cycle vs. the increase in contract prices as a catalyst for strong memory growth is irrational and illogical.</p><p><blockquote>为什么他们选择现货价格的下跌作为周期结束的催化剂，而选择合约价格的上涨作为内存强劲增长的催化剂，这是非理性和不合逻辑的。</blockquote></p><p> Importantly, there's no correlation between PC sales (Chart 3) and prices (Chart 5). In Chart 3, PC sales were at their lowest period (2017 and 2018) while ASPs were at their highest. Thus, there's an inverse relationship between PC sales and ASPs, not a direct relationship that would add credibility to the MS forecast.</p><p><blockquote>重要的是，PC销售（图3）和价格（图5）之间没有相关性。在图3中，个人电脑销量处于最低时期（2017年和2018年），而平均售价处于最高时期。因此，PC销售额和ASP之间存在反比关系，而不是增加MS预测可信度的直接关系。</blockquote></p><p> <b>#4 Spot ASPs Are a Function of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD Factor)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>#4现货ASP是恐惧、不确定性和怀疑的函数（FUD因子）</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Also note that Chart 5 shows that spot and contract prices tracked between October 2016 and the end of 2000. A bifurcation in spot vs contract prices then took place in which spot prices escalated and then collapsed, while contract prices continued a strong growth with no abatement.</p><p><blockquote>另请注意，图5显示了2016年10月至2000年底期间跟踪的现货和合约价格。随后，现货价格与合约价格出现分歧，现货价格上涨，然后崩溃，而合约价格继续强劲增长，没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> This bifurcation is clearly the result of the “semiconductor shortage” in which prices on the spot market have risen as a result of a perceived shortage of memory that has been interpreted as impacting not only automobiles, but every application using chips.</p><p><blockquote>这种分歧显然是“半导体短缺”的结果，在这种情况下，由于感知到的内存短缺，现货市场的价格上涨，这被解释为不仅影响汽车，还影响每一个使用芯片的应用。</blockquote></p><p> TrendForce attempted to explain the shortage is due to stockpiling by PC suppliers, and I agree, which I also attributed to the DRAM collapse in 2000.I discussed stockpiling and hoarding as a major factor in 2000 and 2020, in a June 24, 2021 Semiconductor Deep Dive Marketplace newsletter articlehere.</p><p><blockquote>TrendForce试图解释短缺是由于PC供应商的库存造成的，我同意这一点，我也将其归因于2000年的DRAM崩溃。我在2021年6月24日的半导体深度市场时事通讯文章中讨论了库存和囤积是2000年和2020年的一个主要因素。</blockquote></p><p> However, TrendForce’s statement in its press release of downward pressure on price hikes runs counter to the data in Chart 5 that contract prices have continued to increase unabated.</p><p><blockquote>然而，TrendForce在新闻稿中关于涨价下行压力的说法与图表5中合同价格持续上涨有增无减的数据背道而驰。</blockquote></p><p>   “Regarding the contract market, PC OEMs currently carry relatively high levels of DRAM inventory because they substantially stocked up on PC DRAM beforehand in anticipation of an upcoming shortage. Not only has PC OEMs’ high DRAM inventory put downward pressure on possible price hikes for PC DRAM, but the gradual lifting of COVID-related restrictions in Europe and the US will also likely lower the overall demand for notebook computers, thereby pulling down the overall demand for PC DRAM.”  Spot prices are based on what a buyer is willing to pay for an item with an undercurrent of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. For example, in my June 19, 2021, SA article entitled \"Micron Technology: No Shortage, Strong Growth, Period,\" from a commenter:</p><p><blockquote>“就合约市场而言，PC OEM目前的DRAM库存水平相对较高，因为他们提前大量储备了PC DRAM，预计即将出现短缺。不仅PC OEM的高DRAM库存给PC DRAM可能的价格上涨带来了下行压力，而且欧洲和美国逐步取消与COVID相关的限制也可能降低笔记本电脑的整体需求，从而拉低PC DRAM的整体需求。”现货价格基于买家愿意为带有恐惧、不确定性和怀疑暗流的物品支付的价格。例如，在我2021年6月19日发表的题为“美光科技：不短缺，强劲增长，时期”的SA文章中，来自评论者：</blockquote></p><p>   \"And, to lend credence to your microcontroller hypothesis, we recently were told that we would not be able to get a $3 micro for one of our existing products. I don't know if it was a direct result of the Renesas fire or not. But when we looked at the spot market we were quoted $81 for that part (that's not a typo). So now we have to re-design that board to use a different part.\"  About 10 years ago, I was an \"expert witness\" in a solar cell litigation case, and the basis of the complaint was the fact that spot silicon prices increased from $35 per metric ton to more than $500 per metric ton in a period of a few weeks because of silicon shortages. Once silicon manufacturers started making more silicon, prices dropped.</p><p><blockquote>“而且，为了证实您的微控制器假设，我们最近被告知，我们将无法为我们现有的产品之一获得3美元的微控制器。我不知道这是否是瑞萨火灾的直接结果。但当我们查看现货市场时，该部分的报价为81美元（这不是打字错误）。所以现在我们必须重新设计该板以使用不同的部件。”大约10年前，我是一个太阳能电池诉讼案件的“专家证人”，投诉的基础是由于硅短缺，现货硅价格在几周内从每公吨35美元上涨到每公吨500多美元。一旦硅制造商开始生产更多的硅，价格就会下降。</blockquote></p><p> Both these examples illustrate that spot prices have no direct bearing on real (contract) prices, and are often transitory.</p><p><blockquote>这两个例子都说明现货价格对实际（合同）价格没有直接影响，而且通常是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> Back to the erroneous thesis that a DRAM cycle will end based on spot prices, I show supportive data in Chart 6 that suggests their data is wrong. This chart shows DRAM ASPs as reported directly from Micron, Samsung Electronics(OTC:SSNLF)and SK Hynix(OTC:HXSCL).</p><p><blockquote>回到DRAM周期将根据现货价格结束的错误论点，我在图6中显示了支持性数据，表明他们的数据是错误的。此图表显示了美光、三星电子(OTC：SSNLF)和SK海力士(OTC：HXSCL)直接报告的DRAM平均售价。</blockquote></p><p> Comparing Chart 5 and Chart 6, it is clear that data directly from the DRAM suppliers matches the positive contract prices and not spot prices. Readers must remember also that spot prices represent only 10% of the DRAM prices paid by customers. Contract prices represent 90% of actual prices.</p><p><blockquote>比较图5和图6，很明显，直接来自DRAM供应商的数据与正合同价格相匹配，而不是现货价格。读者还必须记住，现货价格仅占客户支付的DRAM价格的10%。合同价格代表实际价格的90%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d56577da5391c86374739262f773c7f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 6</p><p><blockquote>图表6</blockquote></p><p> Chart 7 shows memory ASPs on a three-month moving average from the SIA (Semiconductor Industry Association). Again, comparing Chart 7 with Chart 5, it is clear that the contract prices are the more valid metric.</p><p><blockquote>图7显示了SIA（半导体行业协会）三个月移动平均值的内存ASP。同样，比较图表7和图表5，很明显合同价格是更有效的指标。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be8f41d833e46a0145982559a7e23732\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"341\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 7</p><p><blockquote>图表7</blockquote></p><p> <b>Investor Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资者要点</b></blockquote></p><p> The recent press release from TrendForce and a report a day later by Morgan Stanley is based in data that's irrational and illogical. Their analysis is based on:</p><p><blockquote>TrendForce最近的新闻稿和摩根士丹利一天后的报告是基于不合理和不合逻辑的数据。他们的分析基于：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>PC DRAM ASPs that represent just 15% of the total DRAM demand.</li>  <li>A drop in PC sales, which have been in decline and only increased due to the pandemic, but low PC sales correlate with high ASPs (Charts 3 and 5).</li>  <li>Failure to recognize that DRAM content per PC is increasing each year and that metric shows no abatement in growth.</li>  <li>DRAM spot prices instead of contract prices, the latter of which correlate with reporting data supplied by DRAM manufacturer.</li> </ul> Strong demand for memory chips will continue through 2023 as supply is held in check not by shortages but judicious capex spend. The strong demand for memory chips such as 5G, servers, and EVs present a continuing tailwind for Micron Technology.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>PC DRAM平均售价仅占DRAM总需求的15%。</li><li>个人电脑销量下降，由于疫情，个人电脑销量一直在下降，只是有所增加，但个人电脑销量低与平均售价高相关（图3和图5）。</li><li>未能认识到每台PC的DRAM内容每年都在增加，并且该指标显示增长没有减少。</li><li>DRAM现货价格而非合约价格，后者与DRAM制造商提供的报告数据相关。</li></ul>对存储芯片的强劲需求将持续到2023年，因为供应受到抑制的不是短缺，而是明智的资本支出。5G、服务器和电动汽车等存储芯片的强劲需求为美光科技带来了持续的推动力。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Micron Technology: Winter May Be Coming, But Not This Year... Nor The Next<blockquote>美光科技：冬天可能来了，但今年不会……也不是下一个</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicron Technology: Winter May Be Coming, But Not This Year... Nor The Next<blockquote>美光科技：冬天可能来了，但今年不会……也不是下一个</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-17 11:23</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>The Morgan Stanley downgrade of Memory chips was based on PC DRAM ASPs that represent just 15% of the total DRAM demand.</li>  <li>The report addressed dropping PC sales, but failed to recognize that DRAM content per PC is increasing each year.</li>  <li>The report focuses on DRAM spot prices, instead of contract prices that make up 90% of supplier ASPs.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/72f0a26068ce9a56688977e5a0dd9578\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>borisyankov/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>摩根士丹利下调存储芯片评级是基于PC DRAM平均售价仅占DRAM总需求的15%。</li><li>该报告谈到了PC销量下降的问题，但没有认识到每台PC的DRAM内容每年都在增加。</li><li>该报告关注的是DRAM现货价格，而不是占供应商ASP 90%的合同价格。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>borisyankov/E+来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analysts downgraded Micron(NASDAQ:MU)to equal weight from overweight, in their industry report titled, “Memory - Winter Is Coming.\" MS cautioned of a coming cool down in the DRAM memory business that could lead to lower DRAM prices.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师在其行业报告《内存——冬天即将来临》中将美光（纳斯达克：MU）评级下调至与跑赢大盘同等的权重。MM警告称，DRAM内存业务即将降温，可能导致DRAM价格下降。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley noted that</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利指出，</blockquote></p><p>   “DRAM conditions are losing steam, and our inflection signposts suggest caution from here there’s been a change from mid-cycle to late cycle, and that this phase-change has historically meant a challenging backdrop for forward returns.”  Micron Technology’sstock had its worst single-day percentage decline since March 16, 2020, when it fell 19.8%. MU's stock price for the past year is shown in Chart 1, illustrating the sell-off in the past few days coupled with a drop of more than 25% since reaching a high on April 12, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>“DRAM状况正在失去动力，我们的拐点路标建议谨慎从这里开始，从周期中期到周期后期发生了变化，这种相变在历史上意味着远期回报面临着充满挑战的背景。”美光科技股价创下2020年3月16日以来最大单日百分比跌幅，当时下跌19.8%。MU过去一年的股价如图1所示，说明了过去几天的抛售以及自2021年4月12日达到高点以来下跌超过25%的情况。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ea0b20556a40eb39c18b7aa1ed295e1c\" tg-width=\"634\" tg-height=\"416\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 1</p><p><blockquote>图表1</blockquote></p><p> This article presents data that refutes the underlying case presented by Morgan Stanley that worsening DRAM demand is contributing to an acceleration of the end of the current memory upcycle leading to the start of a down cycle in 1Q 2022.</p><p><blockquote>本文提供的数据驳斥了摩根士丹利提出的基本观点，即DRAM需求的恶化正在加速当前内存上行周期的结束，导致2022年1Q下行周期的开始。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Morgan Stanley’s Misinterpretation of Data#1 Small Percentage of PC DRAM</b></p><p><blockquote><b>摩根士丹利对数据的误解#1 PC DRAM的百分比很小</b></blockquote></p><p> The first point is the emphasis by Morgan Stanley on PC DRAM price erosion as a harbinger for the downturn in the DRAM market. Why? Because PCs represent just 15% of the demand for DRAMs,as shown in Chart 2, according to our report entitled “<i>Hot ICs: A Market Analysis of Artificial Intelligence, 5G, CMOS Image Sensors, and Memory Chips.\"</i></p><p><blockquote>第一点是摩根士丹利强调PC DRAM价格侵蚀是DRAM市场低迷的先兆。为什么？因为PC仅占DRAM需求的15%，如图2所示，根据我们题为“<i>热门IC：人工智能、5G、CMOS图像传感器和存储芯片的市场分析。”</i></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b40e66f4b73b27303075791c19fe36f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chart 2</p><p><blockquote>图表2</blockquote></p><p> <b>#2 Increased DRAM content per PC</b></p><p><blockquote><b>#2每台PC的DRAM含量增加</b></blockquote></p><p> The 15% DRAM demand for PCs is hardly enough to cause a stop in the memory cycle. But that's beside the point. Morgan Stanley overlooks the fact that DRAM content per PC increases each year even if the PC market has slowed.</p><p><blockquote>PC 15%的DRAM需求几乎不足以导致内存周期的停止。但这不是重点。摩根士丹利忽略了一个事实，即即使个人电脑市场放缓，每台个人电脑的DRAM含量每年都在增加。</blockquote></p><p> Chart 3 shows that PC unit shipments between 2015 and 2023. Indeed, my forecast shows that PCs will decrease in 2022 and 2023, but the decrease is due to a normalization of PC demand following the extraordinary demand for PCs during the work/study/stay-at-home orders associated with the COVID pandemic in 2020 that carried over into 2021.</p><p><blockquote>图3显示了2015年至2023年间PC单位出货量。事实上，我的预测显示，个人电脑将在2022年和2023年下降，但这种下降是由于在与COVID疫情相关的工作/学习/居家订单期间对个人电脑的非凡需求之后，个人电脑需求正常化。2020年延续到2021年。</blockquote></p><p> Prior to 2020, the PC market was decreasing, and I anticipate a corresponding return normalcy with a decrease of a few percent per year in 2022 and 2023. I estimate that DRAM content per PC will increase from 5.5 GB in 2015 to 14 GB in 2023. That’s an increase of 2.5 times during this period.</p><p><blockquote>在2020年之前，个人电脑市场正在下降，我预计2022年和2023年相应的回报将正常化，每年下降几个百分点。我估计每台PC的DRAM内容将从2015年的5.5 GB增加到2023年的14 GB。在此期间增加了2.5倍。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5732cd4948d7209d76ccb4f7628560ab\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 3</p><p><blockquote>图表3</blockquote></p><p> Thus, although PC units will decrease, DRAM content will increase during the next two years. But factoring in the increase in DRAM content per PC, we see in Chart 4 a much different growth in DRAMs.</p><p><blockquote>因此，尽管PC单元将减少，但DRAM内容将在未来两年内增加。但是考虑到每台PC的DRAM内容的增加，我们在图4中看到DRAM的增长非常不同。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7c21d24f41f7f77bc00c62ed82b44f62\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chart 4</p><p><blockquote>图表4</blockquote></p><p> <b>#3 Spot ASPs are Different than Contract ASPs</b></p><p><blockquote><b>#3现货平均售价不同于合约平均售价</b></blockquote></p><p> Chart 5 shows DRAM data comparison for Spot ASPs vs Contract ASPs. The entire rationale for the TrendForce and Morgan Stanley reports is the drop in spot prices in 2021, and the resultant end of the current memory cycle.</p><p><blockquote>图5显示了现货ASP与合约ASP的DRAM数据比较。TrendForce和摩根士丹利报告的全部理由是2021年现货价格下跌，以及当前内存周期的结束。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b5a2774dcaff2d53edd141e0cc1e2d13\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"346\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chart 5</p><p><blockquote>图表5</blockquote></p><p> Why they chose the drop in spot prices as the catalyst for the end of the cycle vs. the increase in contract prices as a catalyst for strong memory growth is irrational and illogical.</p><p><blockquote>为什么他们选择现货价格的下跌作为周期结束的催化剂，而选择合约价格的上涨作为内存强劲增长的催化剂，这是非理性和不合逻辑的。</blockquote></p><p> Importantly, there's no correlation between PC sales (Chart 3) and prices (Chart 5). In Chart 3, PC sales were at their lowest period (2017 and 2018) while ASPs were at their highest. Thus, there's an inverse relationship between PC sales and ASPs, not a direct relationship that would add credibility to the MS forecast.</p><p><blockquote>重要的是，PC销售（图3）和价格（图5）之间没有相关性。在图3中，个人电脑销量处于最低时期（2017年和2018年），而平均售价处于最高时期。因此，PC销售额和ASP之间存在反比关系，而不是增加MS预测可信度的直接关系。</blockquote></p><p> <b>#4 Spot ASPs Are a Function of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD Factor)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>#4现货ASP是恐惧、不确定性和怀疑的函数（FUD因子）</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Also note that Chart 5 shows that spot and contract prices tracked between October 2016 and the end of 2000. A bifurcation in spot vs contract prices then took place in which spot prices escalated and then collapsed, while contract prices continued a strong growth with no abatement.</p><p><blockquote>另请注意，图5显示了2016年10月至2000年底期间跟踪的现货和合约价格。随后，现货价格与合约价格出现分歧，现货价格上涨，然后崩溃，而合约价格继续强劲增长，没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> This bifurcation is clearly the result of the “semiconductor shortage” in which prices on the spot market have risen as a result of a perceived shortage of memory that has been interpreted as impacting not only automobiles, but every application using chips.</p><p><blockquote>这种分歧显然是“半导体短缺”的结果，在这种情况下，由于感知到的内存短缺，现货市场的价格上涨，这被解释为不仅影响汽车，还影响每一个使用芯片的应用。</blockquote></p><p> TrendForce attempted to explain the shortage is due to stockpiling by PC suppliers, and I agree, which I also attributed to the DRAM collapse in 2000.I discussed stockpiling and hoarding as a major factor in 2000 and 2020, in a June 24, 2021 Semiconductor Deep Dive Marketplace newsletter articlehere.</p><p><blockquote>TrendForce试图解释短缺是由于PC供应商的库存造成的，我同意这一点，我也将其归因于2000年的DRAM崩溃。我在2021年6月24日的半导体深度市场时事通讯文章中讨论了库存和囤积是2000年和2020年的一个主要因素。</blockquote></p><p> However, TrendForce’s statement in its press release of downward pressure on price hikes runs counter to the data in Chart 5 that contract prices have continued to increase unabated.</p><p><blockquote>然而，TrendForce在新闻稿中关于涨价下行压力的说法与图表5中合同价格持续上涨有增无减的数据背道而驰。</blockquote></p><p>   “Regarding the contract market, PC OEMs currently carry relatively high levels of DRAM inventory because they substantially stocked up on PC DRAM beforehand in anticipation of an upcoming shortage. Not only has PC OEMs’ high DRAM inventory put downward pressure on possible price hikes for PC DRAM, but the gradual lifting of COVID-related restrictions in Europe and the US will also likely lower the overall demand for notebook computers, thereby pulling down the overall demand for PC DRAM.”  Spot prices are based on what a buyer is willing to pay for an item with an undercurrent of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. For example, in my June 19, 2021, SA article entitled \"Micron Technology: No Shortage, Strong Growth, Period,\" from a commenter:</p><p><blockquote>“就合约市场而言，PC OEM目前的DRAM库存水平相对较高，因为他们提前大量储备了PC DRAM，预计即将出现短缺。不仅PC OEM的高DRAM库存给PC DRAM可能的价格上涨带来了下行压力，而且欧洲和美国逐步取消与COVID相关的限制也可能降低笔记本电脑的整体需求，从而拉低PC DRAM的整体需求。”现货价格基于买家愿意为带有恐惧、不确定性和怀疑暗流的物品支付的价格。例如，在我2021年6月19日发表的题为“美光科技：不短缺，强劲增长，时期”的SA文章中，来自评论者：</blockquote></p><p>   \"And, to lend credence to your microcontroller hypothesis, we recently were told that we would not be able to get a $3 micro for one of our existing products. I don't know if it was a direct result of the Renesas fire or not. But when we looked at the spot market we were quoted $81 for that part (that's not a typo). So now we have to re-design that board to use a different part.\"  About 10 years ago, I was an \"expert witness\" in a solar cell litigation case, and the basis of the complaint was the fact that spot silicon prices increased from $35 per metric ton to more than $500 per metric ton in a period of a few weeks because of silicon shortages. Once silicon manufacturers started making more silicon, prices dropped.</p><p><blockquote>“而且，为了证实您的微控制器假设，我们最近被告知，我们将无法为我们现有的产品之一获得3美元的微控制器。我不知道这是否是瑞萨火灾的直接结果。但当我们查看现货市场时，该部分的报价为81美元（这不是打字错误）。所以现在我们必须重新设计该板以使用不同的部件。”大约10年前，我是一个太阳能电池诉讼案件的“专家证人”，投诉的基础是由于硅短缺，现货硅价格在几周内从每公吨35美元上涨到每公吨500多美元。一旦硅制造商开始生产更多的硅，价格就会下降。</blockquote></p><p> Both these examples illustrate that spot prices have no direct bearing on real (contract) prices, and are often transitory.</p><p><blockquote>这两个例子都说明现货价格对实际（合同）价格没有直接影响，而且通常是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> Back to the erroneous thesis that a DRAM cycle will end based on spot prices, I show supportive data in Chart 6 that suggests their data is wrong. This chart shows DRAM ASPs as reported directly from Micron, Samsung Electronics(OTC:SSNLF)and SK Hynix(OTC:HXSCL).</p><p><blockquote>回到DRAM周期将根据现货价格结束的错误论点，我在图6中显示了支持性数据，表明他们的数据是错误的。此图表显示了美光、三星电子(OTC：SSNLF)和SK海力士(OTC：HXSCL)直接报告的DRAM平均售价。</blockquote></p><p> Comparing Chart 5 and Chart 6, it is clear that data directly from the DRAM suppliers matches the positive contract prices and not spot prices. Readers must remember also that spot prices represent only 10% of the DRAM prices paid by customers. Contract prices represent 90% of actual prices.</p><p><blockquote>比较图5和图6，很明显，直接来自DRAM供应商的数据与正合同价格相匹配，而不是现货价格。读者还必须记住，现货价格仅占客户支付的DRAM价格的10%。合同价格代表实际价格的90%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d56577da5391c86374739262f773c7f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 6</p><p><blockquote>图表6</blockquote></p><p> Chart 7 shows memory ASPs on a three-month moving average from the SIA (Semiconductor Industry Association). Again, comparing Chart 7 with Chart 5, it is clear that the contract prices are the more valid metric.</p><p><blockquote>图7显示了SIA（半导体行业协会）三个月移动平均值的内存ASP。同样，比较图表7和图表5，很明显合同价格是更有效的指标。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be8f41d833e46a0145982559a7e23732\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"341\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Chart 7</p><p><blockquote>图表7</blockquote></p><p> <b>Investor Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资者要点</b></blockquote></p><p> The recent press release from TrendForce and a report a day later by Morgan Stanley is based in data that's irrational and illogical. Their analysis is based on:</p><p><blockquote>TrendForce最近的新闻稿和摩根士丹利一天后的报告是基于不合理和不合逻辑的数据。他们的分析基于：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>PC DRAM ASPs that represent just 15% of the total DRAM demand.</li>  <li>A drop in PC sales, which have been in decline and only increased due to the pandemic, but low PC sales correlate with high ASPs (Charts 3 and 5).</li>  <li>Failure to recognize that DRAM content per PC is increasing each year and that metric shows no abatement in growth.</li>  <li>DRAM spot prices instead of contract prices, the latter of which correlate with reporting data supplied by DRAM manufacturer.</li> </ul> Strong demand for memory chips will continue through 2023 as supply is held in check not by shortages but judicious capex spend. The strong demand for memory chips such as 5G, servers, and EVs present a continuing tailwind for Micron Technology.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>PC DRAM平均售价仅占DRAM总需求的15%。</li><li>个人电脑销量下降，由于疫情，个人电脑销量一直在下降，只是有所增加，但个人电脑销量低与平均售价高相关（图3和图5）。</li><li>未能认识到每台PC的DRAM内容每年都在增加，并且该指标显示增长没有减少。</li><li>DRAM现货价格而非合约价格，后者与DRAM制造商提供的报告数据相关。</li></ul>对存储芯片的强劲需求将持续到2023年，因为供应受到抑制的不是短缺，而是明智的资本支出。5G、服务器和电动汽车等存储芯片的强劲需求为美光科技带来了持续的推动力。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4449857-micron-technology-winter-may-be-coming-but-not-this-year-nor-the-next\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MU":"美光科技"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4449857-micron-technology-winter-may-be-coming-but-not-this-year-nor-the-next","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162723925","content_text":"Summary\n\nThe Morgan Stanley downgrade of Memory chips was based on PC DRAM ASPs that represent just 15% of the total DRAM demand.\nThe report addressed dropping PC sales, but failed to recognize that DRAM content per PC is increasing each year.\nThe report focuses on DRAM spot prices, instead of contract prices that make up 90% of supplier ASPs.\n\nborisyankov/E+ via Getty Images\nMorgan Stanley analysts downgraded Micron(NASDAQ:MU)to equal weight from overweight, in their industry report titled, “Memory - Winter Is Coming.\" MS cautioned of a coming cool down in the DRAM memory business that could lead to lower DRAM prices.\nMorgan Stanley noted that\n\n “DRAM conditions are losing steam, and our inflection signposts suggest caution from here there’s been a change from mid-cycle to late cycle, and that this phase-change has historically meant a challenging backdrop for forward returns.”\n\nMicron Technology’sstock had its worst single-day percentage decline since March 16, 2020, when it fell 19.8%. MU's stock price for the past year is shown in Chart 1, illustrating the sell-off in the past few days coupled with a drop of more than 25% since reaching a high on April 12, 2021.\n\nChart 1\nThis article presents data that refutes the underlying case presented by Morgan Stanley that worsening DRAM demand is contributing to an acceleration of the end of the current memory upcycle leading to the start of a down cycle in 1Q 2022.\nMorgan Stanley’s Misinterpretation of Data#1 Small Percentage of PC DRAM\nThe first point is the emphasis by Morgan Stanley on PC DRAM price erosion as a harbinger for the downturn in the DRAM market. Why? Because PCs represent just 15% of the demand for DRAMs,as shown in Chart 2, according to our report entitled “Hot ICs: A Market Analysis of Artificial Intelligence, 5G, CMOS Image Sensors, and Memory Chips.\"\nChart 2\n#2 Increased DRAM content per PC\nThe 15% DRAM demand for PCs is hardly enough to cause a stop in the memory cycle. But that's beside the point. Morgan Stanley overlooks the fact that DRAM content per PC increases each year even if the PC market has slowed.\nChart 3 shows that PC unit shipments between 2015 and 2023. Indeed, my forecast shows that PCs will decrease in 2022 and 2023, but the decrease is due to a normalization of PC demand following the extraordinary demand for PCs during the work/study/stay-at-home orders associated with the COVID pandemic in 2020 that carried over into 2021.\nPrior to 2020, the PC market was decreasing, and I anticipate a corresponding return normalcy with a decrease of a few percent per year in 2022 and 2023. I estimate that DRAM content per PC will increase from 5.5 GB in 2015 to 14 GB in 2023. That’s an increase of 2.5 times during this period.\n\nChart 3\nThus, although PC units will decrease, DRAM content will increase during the next two years. But factoring in the increase in DRAM content per PC, we see in Chart 4 a much different growth in DRAMs.\nChart 4\n#3 Spot ASPs are Different than Contract ASPs\nChart 5 shows DRAM data comparison for Spot ASPs vs Contract ASPs. The entire rationale for the TrendForce and Morgan Stanley reports is the drop in spot prices in 2021, and the resultant end of the current memory cycle.\nChart 5\nWhy they chose the drop in spot prices as the catalyst for the end of the cycle vs. the increase in contract prices as a catalyst for strong memory growth is irrational and illogical.\nImportantly, there's no correlation between PC sales (Chart 3) and prices (Chart 5). In Chart 3, PC sales were at their lowest period (2017 and 2018) while ASPs were at their highest. Thus, there's an inverse relationship between PC sales and ASPs, not a direct relationship that would add credibility to the MS forecast.\n#4 Spot ASPs Are a Function of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD Factor)\nAlso note that Chart 5 shows that spot and contract prices tracked between October 2016 and the end of 2000. A bifurcation in spot vs contract prices then took place in which spot prices escalated and then collapsed, while contract prices continued a strong growth with no abatement.\nThis bifurcation is clearly the result of the “semiconductor shortage” in which prices on the spot market have risen as a result of a perceived shortage of memory that has been interpreted as impacting not only automobiles, but every application using chips.\nTrendForce attempted to explain the shortage is due to stockpiling by PC suppliers, and I agree, which I also attributed to the DRAM collapse in 2000.I discussed stockpiling and hoarding as a major factor in 2000 and 2020, in a June 24, 2021 Semiconductor Deep Dive Marketplace newsletter articlehere.\nHowever, TrendForce’s statement in its press release of downward pressure on price hikes runs counter to the data in Chart 5 that contract prices have continued to increase unabated.\n\n “Regarding the contract market, PC OEMs currently carry relatively high levels of DRAM inventory because they substantially stocked up on PC DRAM beforehand in anticipation of an upcoming shortage. Not only has PC OEMs’ high DRAM inventory put downward pressure on possible price hikes for PC DRAM, but the gradual lifting of COVID-related restrictions in Europe and the US will also likely lower the overall demand for notebook computers, thereby pulling down the overall demand for PC DRAM.”\n\nSpot prices are based on what a buyer is willing to pay for an item with an undercurrent of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. For example, in my June 19, 2021, SA article entitled \"Micron Technology: No Shortage, Strong Growth, Period,\" from a commenter:\n\n \"And, to lend credence to your microcontroller hypothesis, we recently were told that we would not be able to get a $3 micro for one of our existing products. I don't know if it was a direct result of the Renesas fire or not. But when we looked at the spot market we were quoted $81 for that part (that's not a typo). So now we have to re-design that board to use a different part.\"\n\nAbout 10 years ago, I was an \"expert witness\" in a solar cell litigation case, and the basis of the complaint was the fact that spot silicon prices increased from $35 per metric ton to more than $500 per metric ton in a period of a few weeks because of silicon shortages. Once silicon manufacturers started making more silicon, prices dropped.\nBoth these examples illustrate that spot prices have no direct bearing on real (contract) prices, and are often transitory.\nBack to the erroneous thesis that a DRAM cycle will end based on spot prices, I show supportive data in Chart 6 that suggests their data is wrong. This chart shows DRAM ASPs as reported directly from Micron, Samsung Electronics(OTC:SSNLF)and SK Hynix(OTC:HXSCL).\nComparing Chart 5 and Chart 6, it is clear that data directly from the DRAM suppliers matches the positive contract prices and not spot prices. Readers must remember also that spot prices represent only 10% of the DRAM prices paid by customers. Contract prices represent 90% of actual prices.\n\nChart 6\nChart 7 shows memory ASPs on a three-month moving average from the SIA (Semiconductor Industry Association). Again, comparing Chart 7 with Chart 5, it is clear that the contract prices are the more valid metric.\n\nChart 7\nInvestor Takeaway\nThe recent press release from TrendForce and a report a day later by Morgan Stanley is based in data that's irrational and illogical. Their analysis is based on:\n\nPC DRAM ASPs that represent just 15% of the total DRAM demand.\nA drop in PC sales, which have been in decline and only increased due to the pandemic, but low PC sales correlate with high ASPs (Charts 3 and 5).\nFailure to recognize that DRAM content per PC is increasing each year and that metric shows no abatement in growth.\nDRAM spot prices instead of contract prices, the latter of which correlate with reporting data supplied by DRAM manufacturer.\n\nStrong demand for memory chips will continue through 2023 as supply is held in check not by shortages but judicious capex spend. The strong demand for memory chips such as 5G, servers, and EVs present a continuing tailwind for Micron Technology.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":887,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839411508,"gmtCreate":1629172773804,"gmtModify":1633686824233,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gd gd","listText":"Gd gd","text":"Gd gd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839411508","repostId":"1165381771","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165381771","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629170892,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1165381771?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-17 11:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The 2 Stocks Every Investor Should Be Watching<blockquote>每个投资者都应该关注的两只股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165381771","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Find out what market participants will be talking about tomorrow.","content":"<p><b>Key Points</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要点</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Monday was a mixed day for stocks, which rebounded from their lowest levels of the day.</li>  <li>Two key stocks could determine the direction of the entire market on Tuesday.</li> </ul> Wall Street rebounded from early losses on Monday morning, finishing the day on a mixed note. The&nbsp;<b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b>(DJINDICES:^DJI)and&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC)&nbsp;managed to post modest gains, and even the&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)dramatically reduced the size of its declines over the course of the day.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周一股市涨跌互现，从当天低点反弹。</li><li>两只关键股票可能决定周二整个市场的走向。</li></ul>周一上午，华尔街从早盘的跌幅中反弹，收盘涨跌互现。The<b>道琼斯工业平均指数</b>(DJINDICES：^DJI)和<b>标普500</b>(SNPINDEX：^GSPC)成功实现小幅上涨，甚至<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>（纳斯达克指数：^IXIC）全天跌幅大幅收窄。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb5b728c1f5236c709db3e0270dc3e75\" tg-width=\"1152\" tg-height=\"333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>DATA SOURCE: YAHOO! FINANCE.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来源：雅虎！金融。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Earnings season is beginning to wind down, but there are still some high-profile stocks that have yet to report. Two of the most important stocks in the market right now will be giving their earnings results early Tuesday, and that's why investors should be watching&nbsp;<b>Home Depot</b>(NYSE:HD)&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>Walmart</b>(NYSE:WMT)extremely closely as the&nbsp;retail stocks&nbsp; prepare to release their latest financial reports.</p><p><blockquote>财报季开始接近尾声，但仍有一些备受瞩目的股票尚未公布财报。目前市场上最重要的两只股票将于周二早些时候公布盈利结果，这就是投资者应该关注的原因<b>家得宝</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：HD）和<b>沃尔玛</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：WMT）在零售股准备发布最新财务报告之际极其接近。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b731f72fd9967ccb54241783515762a\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1199\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Feeling at home</b></p><p><blockquote><b>宾至如归的感觉</b></blockquote></p><p> Home Depot was one of the stocks that saw big intraday moves on Monday. Initially falling as much as 1%, the home-improvement retailer ended up rebounding to post a better than 1% gain on the day.</p><p><blockquote>家得宝是周一盘中大幅波动的股票之一。这家家居装修零售商最初下跌1%，最终反弹，当天涨幅超过1%。</blockquote></p><p> Yet what many investors are&nbsp;anxiously awaiting is how well Home Depot can capitalize&nbsp;on continued interest in home renovation and maintenance. Most of those following the stock expect Home Depot to see at least a 10% rise in earnings during its fiscal second quarter from year-ago levels, with sales picking up 7% year over year.</p><p><blockquote>然而，许多投资者焦急等待的是家得宝如何利用人们对房屋装修和维护的持续兴趣。大多数关注该股的人预计家得宝第二财季的盈利将比去年同期至少增长10%，销售额同比增长7%。</blockquote></p><p> If those growth rates seem a little tepid in comparison to Home Depot's past performance, it's important to put last year's numbers into context. Sales a year ago soared 23% compared to the corresponding quarter in calendar 2019, as those dealing with lockdown measures made massive investments in their homes in order to weather the pandemic. Profits were up nearly 25% year over year. Now, with those investments having borne fruit, some homeowners are continuing to make improvements, but many will be satisfied with their efforts to date.</p><p><blockquote>如果与家得宝过去的业绩相比，这些增长率似乎有点不温不火，那么将去年的数据放在背景中很重要。与2019年同期相比，一年前的销售额飙升了23%，因为那些应对封锁措施的人为了抵御疫情而对房屋进行了大量投资。利润同比增长近25%。现在，随着这些投资取得了成果，一些房主正在继续改善，但许多人会对他们迄今为止的努力感到满意。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Walmart makes its move</b></p><p><blockquote><b>沃尔玛出手</b></blockquote></p><p> Shares of Walmart finished Monday up slightly less than 1%. The retailer will announce its second-quarter financial results before the market opens on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>沃尔玛股价周一收盘上涨略低于1%。该零售商将在周二开盘前公布第二季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have reasonable expectations from Walmart after a blockbuster performance a year ago. Earnings should be roughly flat from the second quarter of last year, and sales are likely to ease lower by around 1% year over year. Again, comparisons are somewhat tough, as earnings jumped almost 80% in the year-ago quarter compared to the same period in calendar 2019 before the pandemic took hold.</p><p><blockquote>在一年前的重磅业绩之后，投资者对沃尔玛抱有合理的期望。盈利应与去年第二季度大致持平，销售额可能同比下降1%左右。同样，比较有些困难，因为与疫情爆发前的2019年同期相比，去年同期的盈利增长了近80%。</blockquote></p><p> There are a lot of&nbsp;uncertainties about Walmart right now. A strong economy should bolster consumer spending, but that sometimes translates into weakness for Walmart if consumers decide to spend up on pricier items from competitors like&nbsp;<b>Target</b>. Conversely, some fear that the recent rise in COVID-19 cases could start to eat into economic growth, and that seems increasingly reflected in consumer sentiment metrics.</p><p><blockquote>沃尔玛目前存在很多不确定性。强劲的经济应该会提振消费者支出，但如果消费者决定从竞争对手那里购买更昂贵的商品，例如<b>目标</b>相反，一些人担心最近COVID-19病例的增加可能会开始侵蚀经济增长，这似乎越来越多地反映在消费者信心指标中。</blockquote></p><p> From a longer-term perspective, the big question facing Walmart is whether its investments in bolstering its online e-commerce channel will pay off permanently. During the worst days of the pandemic, Walmart customers flocked to online ordering in order to get necessities. When given a choice to shop in person or online, however, it remains to be seen what Walmart shoppers will do. The numbers will say a lot about whether all of Walmart's efforts have been in vain or will produce lasting advantages.</p><p><blockquote>从长远来看，沃尔玛面临的一个大问题是，其在加强在线电子商务渠道方面的投资是否会永久获得回报。在疫情最糟糕的日子里，沃尔玛的顾客蜂拥到网上订购，以获得必需品。然而，当可以选择亲自购物或网上购物时，沃尔玛购物者会怎么做还有待观察。这些数字将充分说明沃尔玛的所有努力是徒劳还是会产生持久的优势。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Keep your eyes open</b></p><p><blockquote><b>睁大眼睛</b></blockquote></p><p> No matter what Home Depot and Walmart announce tomorrow, they're likely to move the entire market. With so much volatility lately, surprising news from either of these companies could have a dramatic impact on Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论家得宝和沃尔玛明天宣布什么，它们都可能改变整个市场。由于最近波动如此之大，来自这两家公司的令人惊讶的消息都可能对华尔街产生巨大影响。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The 2 Stocks Every Investor Should Be Watching<blockquote>每个投资者都应该关注的两只股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe 2 Stocks Every Investor Should Be Watching<blockquote>每个投资者都应该关注的两只股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-17 11:28</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Key Points</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要点</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Monday was a mixed day for stocks, which rebounded from their lowest levels of the day.</li>  <li>Two key stocks could determine the direction of the entire market on Tuesday.</li> </ul> Wall Street rebounded from early losses on Monday morning, finishing the day on a mixed note. The&nbsp;<b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b>(DJINDICES:^DJI)and&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC)&nbsp;managed to post modest gains, and even the&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)dramatically reduced the size of its declines over the course of the day.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周一股市涨跌互现，从当天低点反弹。</li><li>两只关键股票可能决定周二整个市场的走向。</li></ul>周一上午，华尔街从早盘的跌幅中反弹，收盘涨跌互现。The<b>道琼斯工业平均指数</b>(DJINDICES：^DJI)和<b>标普500</b>(SNPINDEX：^GSPC)成功实现小幅上涨，甚至<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>（纳斯达克指数：^IXIC）全天跌幅大幅收窄。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb5b728c1f5236c709db3e0270dc3e75\" tg-width=\"1152\" tg-height=\"333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>DATA SOURCE: YAHOO! FINANCE.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来源：雅虎！金融。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Earnings season is beginning to wind down, but there are still some high-profile stocks that have yet to report. Two of the most important stocks in the market right now will be giving their earnings results early Tuesday, and that's why investors should be watching&nbsp;<b>Home Depot</b>(NYSE:HD)&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>Walmart</b>(NYSE:WMT)extremely closely as the&nbsp;retail stocks&nbsp; prepare to release their latest financial reports.</p><p><blockquote>财报季开始接近尾声，但仍有一些备受瞩目的股票尚未公布财报。目前市场上最重要的两只股票将于周二早些时候公布盈利结果，这就是投资者应该关注的原因<b>家得宝</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：HD）和<b>沃尔玛</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：WMT）在零售股准备发布最新财务报告之际极其接近。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b731f72fd9967ccb54241783515762a\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1199\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Feeling at home</b></p><p><blockquote><b>宾至如归的感觉</b></blockquote></p><p> Home Depot was one of the stocks that saw big intraday moves on Monday. Initially falling as much as 1%, the home-improvement retailer ended up rebounding to post a better than 1% gain on the day.</p><p><blockquote>家得宝是周一盘中大幅波动的股票之一。这家家居装修零售商最初下跌1%，最终反弹，当天涨幅超过1%。</blockquote></p><p> Yet what many investors are&nbsp;anxiously awaiting is how well Home Depot can capitalize&nbsp;on continued interest in home renovation and maintenance. Most of those following the stock expect Home Depot to see at least a 10% rise in earnings during its fiscal second quarter from year-ago levels, with sales picking up 7% year over year.</p><p><blockquote>然而，许多投资者焦急等待的是家得宝如何利用人们对房屋装修和维护的持续兴趣。大多数关注该股的人预计家得宝第二财季的盈利将比去年同期至少增长10%，销售额同比增长7%。</blockquote></p><p> If those growth rates seem a little tepid in comparison to Home Depot's past performance, it's important to put last year's numbers into context. Sales a year ago soared 23% compared to the corresponding quarter in calendar 2019, as those dealing with lockdown measures made massive investments in their homes in order to weather the pandemic. Profits were up nearly 25% year over year. Now, with those investments having borne fruit, some homeowners are continuing to make improvements, but many will be satisfied with their efforts to date.</p><p><blockquote>如果与家得宝过去的业绩相比，这些增长率似乎有点不温不火，那么将去年的数据放在背景中很重要。与2019年同期相比，一年前的销售额飙升了23%，因为那些应对封锁措施的人为了抵御疫情而对房屋进行了大量投资。利润同比增长近25%。现在，随着这些投资取得了成果，一些房主正在继续改善，但许多人会对他们迄今为止的努力感到满意。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Walmart makes its move</b></p><p><blockquote><b>沃尔玛出手</b></blockquote></p><p> Shares of Walmart finished Monday up slightly less than 1%. The retailer will announce its second-quarter financial results before the market opens on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>沃尔玛股价周一收盘上涨略低于1%。该零售商将在周二开盘前公布第二季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have reasonable expectations from Walmart after a blockbuster performance a year ago. Earnings should be roughly flat from the second quarter of last year, and sales are likely to ease lower by around 1% year over year. Again, comparisons are somewhat tough, as earnings jumped almost 80% in the year-ago quarter compared to the same period in calendar 2019 before the pandemic took hold.</p><p><blockquote>在一年前的重磅业绩之后，投资者对沃尔玛抱有合理的期望。盈利应与去年第二季度大致持平，销售额可能同比下降1%左右。同样，比较有些困难，因为与疫情爆发前的2019年同期相比，去年同期的盈利增长了近80%。</blockquote></p><p> There are a lot of&nbsp;uncertainties about Walmart right now. A strong economy should bolster consumer spending, but that sometimes translates into weakness for Walmart if consumers decide to spend up on pricier items from competitors like&nbsp;<b>Target</b>. Conversely, some fear that the recent rise in COVID-19 cases could start to eat into economic growth, and that seems increasingly reflected in consumer sentiment metrics.</p><p><blockquote>沃尔玛目前存在很多不确定性。强劲的经济应该会提振消费者支出，但如果消费者决定从竞争对手那里购买更昂贵的商品，例如<b>目标</b>相反，一些人担心最近COVID-19病例的增加可能会开始侵蚀经济增长，这似乎越来越多地反映在消费者信心指标中。</blockquote></p><p> From a longer-term perspective, the big question facing Walmart is whether its investments in bolstering its online e-commerce channel will pay off permanently. During the worst days of the pandemic, Walmart customers flocked to online ordering in order to get necessities. When given a choice to shop in person or online, however, it remains to be seen what Walmart shoppers will do. The numbers will say a lot about whether all of Walmart's efforts have been in vain or will produce lasting advantages.</p><p><blockquote>从长远来看，沃尔玛面临的一个大问题是，其在加强在线电子商务渠道方面的投资是否会永久获得回报。在疫情最糟糕的日子里，沃尔玛的顾客蜂拥到网上订购，以获得必需品。然而，当可以选择亲自购物或网上购物时，沃尔玛购物者会怎么做还有待观察。这些数字将充分说明沃尔玛的所有努力是徒劳还是会产生持久的优势。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Keep your eyes open</b></p><p><blockquote><b>睁大眼睛</b></blockquote></p><p> No matter what Home Depot and Walmart announce tomorrow, they're likely to move the entire market. With so much volatility lately, surprising news from either of these companies could have a dramatic impact on Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论家得宝和沃尔玛明天宣布什么，它们都可能改变整个市场。由于最近波动如此之大，来自这两家公司的令人惊讶的消息都可能对华尔街产生巨大影响。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/16/the-2-stocks-every-investor-should-be-watching/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HD":"家得宝","WMT":"沃尔玛"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/16/the-2-stocks-every-investor-should-be-watching/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165381771","content_text":"Key Points\n\nMonday was a mixed day for stocks, which rebounded from their lowest levels of the day.\nTwo key stocks could determine the direction of the entire market on Tuesday.\n\nWall Street rebounded from early losses on Monday morning, finishing the day on a mixed note. The Dow Jones Industrial Average(DJINDICES:^DJI)and S&P 500(SNPINDEX:^GSPC) managed to post modest gains, and even the Nasdaq Composite(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)dramatically reduced the size of its declines over the course of the day.\nDATA SOURCE: YAHOO! FINANCE.\nEarnings season is beginning to wind down, but there are still some high-profile stocks that have yet to report. Two of the most important stocks in the market right now will be giving their earnings results early Tuesday, and that's why investors should be watching Home Depot(NYSE:HD) and Walmart(NYSE:WMT)extremely closely as the retail stocks  prepare to release their latest financial reports.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nFeeling at home\nHome Depot was one of the stocks that saw big intraday moves on Monday. Initially falling as much as 1%, the home-improvement retailer ended up rebounding to post a better than 1% gain on the day.\nYet what many investors are anxiously awaiting is how well Home Depot can capitalize on continued interest in home renovation and maintenance. Most of those following the stock expect Home Depot to see at least a 10% rise in earnings during its fiscal second quarter from year-ago levels, with sales picking up 7% year over year.\nIf those growth rates seem a little tepid in comparison to Home Depot's past performance, it's important to put last year's numbers into context. Sales a year ago soared 23% compared to the corresponding quarter in calendar 2019, as those dealing with lockdown measures made massive investments in their homes in order to weather the pandemic. Profits were up nearly 25% year over year. Now, with those investments having borne fruit, some homeowners are continuing to make improvements, but many will be satisfied with their efforts to date.\nWalmart makes its move\nShares of Walmart finished Monday up slightly less than 1%. The retailer will announce its second-quarter financial results before the market opens on Tuesday.\nInvestors have reasonable expectations from Walmart after a blockbuster performance a year ago. Earnings should be roughly flat from the second quarter of last year, and sales are likely to ease lower by around 1% year over year. Again, comparisons are somewhat tough, as earnings jumped almost 80% in the year-ago quarter compared to the same period in calendar 2019 before the pandemic took hold.\nThere are a lot of uncertainties about Walmart right now. A strong economy should bolster consumer spending, but that sometimes translates into weakness for Walmart if consumers decide to spend up on pricier items from competitors like Target. Conversely, some fear that the recent rise in COVID-19 cases could start to eat into economic growth, and that seems increasingly reflected in consumer sentiment metrics.\nFrom a longer-term perspective, the big question facing Walmart is whether its investments in bolstering its online e-commerce channel will pay off permanently. During the worst days of the pandemic, Walmart customers flocked to online ordering in order to get necessities. When given a choice to shop in person or online, however, it remains to be seen what Walmart shoppers will do. The numbers will say a lot about whether all of Walmart's efforts have been in vain or will produce lasting advantages.\nKeep your eyes open\nNo matter what Home Depot and Walmart announce tomorrow, they're likely to move the entire market. With so much volatility lately, surprising news from either of these companies could have a dramatic impact on Wall Street.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"WMT":0.9,"HD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":595,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839411693,"gmtCreate":1629172763312,"gmtModify":1633686824356,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gd","listText":"Gd","text":"Gd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839411693","repostId":"2160854275","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2160854275","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1629171148,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2160854275?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-17 11:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Can Amazon, Microsoft, Netflix, Spotify Gain From New Big Tech Bill?<blockquote>Amazon、微软、Netflix、Spotify如何从新的大型科技法案中获益？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160854275","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Last Wednesday, a bipartisan group of Senators launched a bill to rein the growing mobile operating ","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1e06ed07d3863d7cffd4df0ba07f1776\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Last Wednesday, a bipartisan group of Senators launched a bill to rein the growing mobile operating system dominance of&nbsp;<b>Apple Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: AAPL) and&nbsp;<b>Alphabet Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google.</li>  <li>The&nbsp;Open App Markets Act&nbsp;threatens the iPhone maker's $22 billion in annual high-margin revenue it makes from the App store. Apple has protested against the bill citing user security and privacy concerns, Bloomberg reported</li>  <li><b>Spotify Technology SA</b>&nbsp;(NYSE: SPOT), Tile Inc, and&nbsp;<b>Match Group Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: MTCH) had&nbsp;previously alleged&nbsp;that Apple and Google's app stores are barriers to competition, especially their commissions on mobile device transactions. Epic Games&nbsp;too leveled similar&nbsp;allegations and is seeking its payment system for in-app purchases in its games.</li>  <li>The bill can have far-reaching consequences if it becomes the law. An iPhone owner would be able to download another app store to bypass Apple's or install apps and its approval process.</li>  <li>App makers like&nbsp;<b>Amazon.com Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: AMZN),&nbsp;<b>Netflix Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: NFLX), and Spotify can direct customers to their websites to sign up for subscriptions, dodging Apple's commissions.</li>  <li>Bloomberg notes that the law could be a boon for Amazon as it owns an app store and Spotify too, which itself has been blamed for unfair competition and shoddy treatment of artists.</li>  <li><b>Microsoft Corp</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: MSFT) can also defend its Xbox gaming service from the bill's provisions by projecting it as an entertainment console instead of a computing platform.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>上周三，一个由两党参议员组成的小组推出了一项法案，旨在遏制移动操作系统日益增长的主导地位<b>苹果公司</b>（纳斯达克：AAPL）和<b>Alphabet公司</b>（纳斯达克：GOOG）（纳斯达克：GOOGL）谷歌。</li><li>《开放应用市场法案》威胁到这家iPhone制造商每年从App store获得的220亿美元高利润收入。据彭博社报道，苹果以用户安全和隐私问题为由抗议该法案</li><li><b>Spotify技术公司</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SPOT）、Tile Inc和<b>火柴集团公司</b>（纳斯达克：MTCH）此前曾指控苹果和谷歌的应用商店是竞争壁垒，尤其是它们在移动设备交易上的佣金。Epic Games也提出了类似的指控，并正在寻求其游戏内购买的支付系统。</li><li>如果该法案成为法律，可能会产生深远的影响。iPhone用户将能够下载另一个应用商店来绕过苹果的应用商店或安装应用程序及其审批流程。</li><li>应用程序制造商喜欢<b>亚马逊公司</b>（纳斯达克：AMZN），<b>Netflix</b>（纳斯达克：NFLX），Spotify可以引导客户到他们的网站注册订阅，从而避开苹果的佣金。</li><li>彭博社指出，这项法律可能对亚马逊有利，因为它还拥有一家应用商店和Spotify，而Spotify本身也被指责不公平竞争和对艺术家的劣质待遇。</li><li><b>微软公司</b>（纳斯达克：MSFT）还可以通过将其视为娱乐控制台而不是计算平台来保护其Xbox游戏服务免受该法案条款的影响。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Can Amazon, Microsoft, Netflix, Spotify Gain From New Big Tech Bill?<blockquote>Amazon、微软、Netflix、Spotify如何从新的大型科技法案中获益？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Can Amazon, Microsoft, Netflix, Spotify Gain From New Big Tech Bill?<blockquote>Amazon、微软、Netflix、Spotify如何从新的大型科技法案中获益？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-17 11:32</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1e06ed07d3863d7cffd4df0ba07f1776\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Last Wednesday, a bipartisan group of Senators launched a bill to rein the growing mobile operating system dominance of&nbsp;<b>Apple Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: AAPL) and&nbsp;<b>Alphabet Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google.</li>  <li>The&nbsp;Open App Markets Act&nbsp;threatens the iPhone maker's $22 billion in annual high-margin revenue it makes from the App store. Apple has protested against the bill citing user security and privacy concerns, Bloomberg reported</li>  <li><b>Spotify Technology SA</b>&nbsp;(NYSE: SPOT), Tile Inc, and&nbsp;<b>Match Group Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: MTCH) had&nbsp;previously alleged&nbsp;that Apple and Google's app stores are barriers to competition, especially their commissions on mobile device transactions. Epic Games&nbsp;too leveled similar&nbsp;allegations and is seeking its payment system for in-app purchases in its games.</li>  <li>The bill can have far-reaching consequences if it becomes the law. An iPhone owner would be able to download another app store to bypass Apple's or install apps and its approval process.</li>  <li>App makers like&nbsp;<b>Amazon.com Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: AMZN),&nbsp;<b>Netflix Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: NFLX), and Spotify can direct customers to their websites to sign up for subscriptions, dodging Apple's commissions.</li>  <li>Bloomberg notes that the law could be a boon for Amazon as it owns an app store and Spotify too, which itself has been blamed for unfair competition and shoddy treatment of artists.</li>  <li><b>Microsoft Corp</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ: MSFT) can also defend its Xbox gaming service from the bill's provisions by projecting it as an entertainment console instead of a computing platform.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>上周三，一个由两党参议员组成的小组推出了一项法案，旨在遏制移动操作系统日益增长的主导地位<b>苹果公司</b>（纳斯达克：AAPL）和<b>Alphabet公司</b>（纳斯达克：GOOG）（纳斯达克：GOOGL）谷歌。</li><li>《开放应用市场法案》威胁到这家iPhone制造商每年从App store获得的220亿美元高利润收入。据彭博社报道，苹果以用户安全和隐私问题为由抗议该法案</li><li><b>Spotify技术公司</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SPOT）、Tile Inc和<b>火柴集团公司</b>（纳斯达克：MTCH）此前曾指控苹果和谷歌的应用商店是竞争壁垒，尤其是它们在移动设备交易上的佣金。Epic Games也提出了类似的指控，并正在寻求其游戏内购买的支付系统。</li><li>如果该法案成为法律，可能会产生深远的影响。iPhone用户将能够下载另一个应用商店来绕过苹果的应用商店或安装应用程序及其审批流程。</li><li>应用程序制造商喜欢<b>亚马逊公司</b>（纳斯达克：AMZN），<b>Netflix</b>（纳斯达克：NFLX），Spotify可以引导客户到他们的网站注册订阅，从而避开苹果的佣金。</li><li>彭博社指出，这项法律可能对亚马逊有利，因为它还拥有一家应用商店和Spotify，而Spotify本身也被指责不公平竞争和对艺术家的劣质待遇。</li><li><b>微软公司</b>（纳斯达克：MSFT）还可以通过将其视为娱乐控制台而不是计算平台来保护其Xbox游戏服务免受该法案条款的影响。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NGD":"New Gold","NFLX":"奈飞","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软","SPOT":"Spotify Technology S.A.","AMZN":"亚马逊","GOOG":"谷歌"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2160854275","content_text":"Last Wednesday, a bipartisan group of Senators launched a bill to rein the growing mobile operating system dominance of Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google.\nThe Open App Markets Act threatens the iPhone maker's $22 billion in annual high-margin revenue it makes from the App store. Apple has protested against the bill citing user security and privacy concerns, Bloomberg reported\nSpotify Technology SA (NYSE: SPOT), Tile Inc, and Match Group Inc (NASDAQ: MTCH) had previously alleged that Apple and Google's app stores are barriers to competition, especially their commissions on mobile device transactions. Epic Games too leveled similar allegations and is seeking its payment system for in-app purchases in its games.\nThe bill can have far-reaching consequences if it becomes the law. An iPhone owner would be able to download another app store to bypass Apple's or install apps and its approval process.\nApp makers like Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN), Netflix Inc (NASDAQ: NFLX), and Spotify can direct customers to their websites to sign up for subscriptions, dodging Apple's commissions.\nBloomberg notes that the law could be a boon for Amazon as it owns an app store and Spotify too, which itself has been blamed for unfair competition and shoddy treatment of artists.\nMicrosoft Corp (NASDAQ: MSFT) can also defend its Xbox gaming service from the bill's provisions by projecting it as an entertainment console instead of a computing platform.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":0.9,"GOOG":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"NGD":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"SPOT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":695,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839411105,"gmtCreate":1629172751207,"gmtModify":1633686824478,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gd gd gd","listText":"Gd gd gd","text":"Gd gd gd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839411105","repostId":"2160275129","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2160275129","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1629172222,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2160275129?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-17 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Home Depot Looks Ready To Breakout Soon: Could Earnings Be The Catalyst?<blockquote>家得宝看起来即将突破：盈利会成为催化剂吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160275129","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: HD) shares traded higher Monday, likely in anticipation of the earnings repor","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cf16f3823229666b7cf1eb04c9730a8\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Home Depot Inc.</b> (NYSE: HD) shares traded higher Monday, likely in anticipation of the earnings report the company is scheduled to announce Tuesday morning before the market open. The company is expected to post increased earnings per share of $4.36 and revenue of $40.63 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b>家得宝公司。</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：HD）股价周一走高，可能是由于预期该公司计划于周二上午开市前公布的收益报告。该公司预计每股收益将增加4.36美元，营收将增加406.3亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Home Depot was up 1.18% at $335.05 at the close.</p><p><blockquote>家得宝收盘上涨1.18%，至335.05美元。</blockquote></p><p> Home Depot Daily Chart Analysis</p><p><blockquote>家得宝日线图分析</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>The stock looks to be nearing resistance in what technical traders call an ascending triangle pattern.</li>  <li>The stock trades above both the 50-day moving average (green), and the 200-day moving average (blue), indicating the stock is likely facing a period of bullish sentiment.</li>  <li>Each of these moving averages may hold as a potential area of support in the future.</li>  <li>The $340 price level has held as resistance in the past&nbsp;and may continue to hold as resistance. The stock has found support at the higher low trendline multiple times in the past.</li>  <li>The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has been trading sideways above the middle line and sits at 60. This means there are slightly more buyers in the stock than sellers.</li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e4d53886a2c875bad10311001c62f8c6\" tg-width=\"1982\" tg-height=\"1354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>该股看起来已接近技术交易员看涨期权上升三角形形态的阻力位。</li><li>该股交易价格高于50日移动平均线（绿色）和200日移动平均线（蓝色），表明该股可能面临一段看涨情绪。</li><li>这些移动平均线中的每一条都可能成为未来的潜在支撑区域。</li><li>340美元的价格水平过去一直是阻力位，并可能继续是阻力位。该股过去曾多次在较高的低点趋势线找到支撑。</li><li>相对强弱指数（RSI）一直在中线上方横盘整理，位于60。这意味着该股的买家略多于卖家。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p> What’s Next For Home Depot?</p><p><blockquote>家得宝的下一步是什么？</blockquote></p><p> Bullish traders are looking to see the stock continue to trade above the higher low trendline and then cross above resistance and see a breakout. Bulls would then like to see the stock consolidate above the resistance level for a possible further move.</p><p><blockquote>看涨交易者希望看到该股继续在较高的低点趋势线上方交易，然后突破阻力位并出现突破。多头希望看到该股在阻力位上方盘整，以便可能进一步上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Bearish traders would like to see the stock fall below the higher low trendline and be able to hold below it. This could let the stock see a further bearish push. Bears are also looking for the price to cross below the moving averages for a possible change in sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>看跌交易者希望看到股票跌破较高的低点趋势线，并能够保持在该趋势线下方。这可能会让该股进一步看跌。空头也在寻找价格跌破移动平均线，以应对情绪可能发生的变化。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Home Depot Looks Ready To Breakout Soon: Could Earnings Be The Catalyst?<blockquote>家得宝看起来即将突破：盈利会成为催化剂吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHome Depot Looks Ready To Breakout Soon: Could Earnings Be The Catalyst?<blockquote>家得宝看起来即将突破：盈利会成为催化剂吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-17 11:50</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cf16f3823229666b7cf1eb04c9730a8\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Home Depot Inc.</b> (NYSE: HD) shares traded higher Monday, likely in anticipation of the earnings report the company is scheduled to announce Tuesday morning before the market open. The company is expected to post increased earnings per share of $4.36 and revenue of $40.63 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b>家得宝公司。</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：HD）股价周一走高，可能是由于预期该公司计划于周二上午开市前公布的收益报告。该公司预计每股收益将增加4.36美元，营收将增加406.3亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Home Depot was up 1.18% at $335.05 at the close.</p><p><blockquote>家得宝收盘上涨1.18%，至335.05美元。</blockquote></p><p> Home Depot Daily Chart Analysis</p><p><blockquote>家得宝日线图分析</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>The stock looks to be nearing resistance in what technical traders call an ascending triangle pattern.</li>  <li>The stock trades above both the 50-day moving average (green), and the 200-day moving average (blue), indicating the stock is likely facing a period of bullish sentiment.</li>  <li>Each of these moving averages may hold as a potential area of support in the future.</li>  <li>The $340 price level has held as resistance in the past&nbsp;and may continue to hold as resistance. The stock has found support at the higher low trendline multiple times in the past.</li>  <li>The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has been trading sideways above the middle line and sits at 60. This means there are slightly more buyers in the stock than sellers.</li> </ul> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e4d53886a2c875bad10311001c62f8c6\" tg-width=\"1982\" tg-height=\"1354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>该股看起来已接近技术交易员看涨期权上升三角形形态的阻力位。</li><li>该股交易价格高于50日移动平均线（绿色）和200日移动平均线（蓝色），表明该股可能面临一段看涨情绪。</li><li>这些移动平均线中的每一条都可能成为未来的潜在支撑区域。</li><li>340美元的价格水平过去一直是阻力位，并可能继续是阻力位。该股过去曾多次在较高的低点趋势线找到支撑。</li><li>相对强弱指数（RSI）一直在中线上方横盘整理，位于60。这意味着该股的买家略多于卖家。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p> What’s Next For Home Depot?</p><p><blockquote>家得宝的下一步是什么？</blockquote></p><p> Bullish traders are looking to see the stock continue to trade above the higher low trendline and then cross above resistance and see a breakout. Bulls would then like to see the stock consolidate above the resistance level for a possible further move.</p><p><blockquote>看涨交易者希望看到该股继续在较高的低点趋势线上方交易，然后突破阻力位并出现突破。多头希望看到该股在阻力位上方盘整，以便可能进一步上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Bearish traders would like to see the stock fall below the higher low trendline and be able to hold below it. This could let the stock see a further bearish push. Bears are also looking for the price to cross below the moving averages for a possible change in sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>看跌交易者希望看到股票跌破较高的低点趋势线，并能够保持在该趋势线下方。这可能会让该股进一步看跌。空头也在寻找价格跌破移动平均线，以应对情绪可能发生的变化。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HD":"家得宝","HBCP":"Home Bancorp Inc"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2160275129","content_text":"Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: HD) shares traded higher Monday, likely in anticipation of the earnings report the company is scheduled to announce Tuesday morning before the market open. The company is expected to post increased earnings per share of $4.36 and revenue of $40.63 billion.\nHome Depot was up 1.18% at $335.05 at the close.\nHome Depot Daily Chart Analysis\n\nThe stock looks to be nearing resistance in what technical traders call an ascending triangle pattern.\nThe stock trades above both the 50-day moving average (green), and the 200-day moving average (blue), indicating the stock is likely facing a period of bullish sentiment.\nEach of these moving averages may hold as a potential area of support in the future.\nThe $340 price level has held as resistance in the past and may continue to hold as resistance. The stock has found support at the higher low trendline multiple times in the past.\nThe Relative Strength Index (RSI) has been trading sideways above the middle line and sits at 60. This means there are slightly more buyers in the stock than sellers.\n\n\nWhat’s Next For Home Depot?\nBullish traders are looking to see the stock continue to trade above the higher low trendline and then cross above resistance and see a breakout. Bulls would then like to see the stock consolidate above the resistance level for a possible further move.\nBearish traders would like to see the stock fall below the higher low trendline and be able to hold below it. This could let the stock see a further bearish push. Bears are also looking for the price to cross below the moving averages for a possible change in sentiment.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HBCP":0.9,"HD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":710,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":139388151,"gmtCreate":1621592495073,"gmtModify":1634187822088,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will coinbase go up","listText":"Will coinbase go up","text":"Will coinbase go up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":3,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/139388151","repostId":"1171649832","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":870,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897837330,"gmtCreate":1628904796720,"gmtModify":1631884196819,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>sa sad&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>sa sad&nbsp;","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$sa sad","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/416c2954db736841ec5db967868b6187","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897837330","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":453,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894192629,"gmtCreate":1628810440861,"gmtModify":1633689384409,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad","listText":"Sad","text":"Sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894192629","repostId":"2159266201","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830697709,"gmtCreate":1629069395801,"gmtModify":1633687733039,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up ip up","listText":"Up ip up","text":"Up ip up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830697709","repostId":"2159248601","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":642,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":805310811,"gmtCreate":1627860415633,"gmtModify":1633755959645,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/805310811","repostId":"1142892616","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":500,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146056698,"gmtCreate":1626046221214,"gmtModify":1633930778351,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Huh","listText":"Huh","text":"Huh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/146056698","repostId":"2150006173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":343,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893048606,"gmtCreate":1628224262905,"gmtModify":1633752430217,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893048606","repostId":"1193751771","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193751771","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628222237,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1193751771?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 11:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193751771","media":"yahoo finance","summary":"When President Obama ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in thei","content":"<p>When President Obama&nbsp;ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and&nbsp;locked in the new rules, with no industry input.</p><p><blockquote>当奥巴马总统在2012年提高燃油经济性标准时，一些汽车制造商悄悄地提高了轮胎。到2025年，新规则将燃油效率要求提高了近一倍，迫使昂贵的新技术迅速采用。如果技术成熟得不够快，2018年的中途审查本应提供一个出口。但当唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)在2016年赢得总统大选时，奥巴马提前了最后期限并锁定了新规则，没有行业投入。</blockquote></p><p> The shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency,&nbsp;Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump&nbsp;sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.</p><p><blockquote>被回避的汽车行业向特朗普寻求救济，并得到了救济。就任总统两个月后，特朗普重新启动了中途审查，2020年特朗普大幅降低了2025年的目标。特朗普还试图阻止加州和其他24个州设定高于联邦水平的里程标准。这导致了该行业的分裂，一些汽车制造商站在特朗普一边，另一些则站在加州一边。</blockquote></p><p> President Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.</p><p><blockquote>拜登总统现在正在撤销特朗普的撤销，并再次推动燃油经济性的大幅提高。但他在汽车制造商的更多合作下做到了这一点，这也是奥巴马没有的优势：电动汽车比九年前走得更远，每个主要汽车制造商都在将电动汽车推向市场。现在，这使得汽车制造商更容易削减其车队的排放，同时具有讽刺意味的是，这使得政府能够软化仍使用汽油的车辆的效率目标。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>Automakers are on board</b></h3> A new Biden executive order sets a target for up to&nbsp;50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>汽车制造商纷纷加入</b></h3>拜登的一项新行政命令设定了到2030年销售的所有新车中高达50%实现电气化的目标，这意味着它们要么是全插电式汽车，要么是兼有燃气发动机和电动机的混合动力汽车，要么是氢动力汽车。请注意，这是一个“目标”，而不是一个需求。拜登的目标与汽车制造商已经宣布的目标基本一致，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>目标是到2035年全面淘汰汽油和柴油动力汽车。达不到目标的惩罚？什么都没有。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1af6cf6099a51f8b7b2be1a35f29a84\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>A sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>2021年7月21日星期三上午，宾夕法尼亚州斯普林镇希尔顿酒店Homewood Suites的ChargePoint车辆(EV)充电站上写着“仅限电动汽车充电”的标志。（摄影：Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p> Biden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump&nbsp;lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that&nbsp;would require a 3.7% annual improvement.</p><p><blockquote>拜登还将启动将汽油动力汽车燃油经济性标准提高到特朗普水平之上的进程。奥巴马的规定要求燃油经济性每年提高约5%。特朗普将这一比例下调至1.5%。据报道，拜登将提出新规则，要求每年提高3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> It will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">Bayerische Motoren Werke AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">Honda</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">Volkswagen AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">Volvo AB</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> and Jeep-Chrysler parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">Stellantis NV</a>—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.</p><p><blockquote>制定管理燃油经济性提高的联邦法规需要时间，但汽车行业似乎不太可能在幕后试图淡化这一点，而不是在之前的燃油经济性提高之争中。七家汽车制造商——<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">巴伐利亚汽车厂股份公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">本田</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">大众汽车公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">沃尔沃AB</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>和吉普-克莱斯勒母公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">斯特兰蒂斯公司</a>-提供了白宫在宣布拜登新的电动汽车目标时分发的支持声明。通用汽车、福特和Stellantis异口同声地表示：“我们期待与拜登政府合作……制定能够实现这些雄心勃勃目标的政策。”汽车制造商联手赞扬新的联邦法规的情况并不常见。</blockquote></p><p> There’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.</p><p><blockquote>对于汽车制造商来说，这是一个巨大的甜头：数十亿美元的联邦支出用于支持电动汽车的开发。国会正在通过的两党基础设施法案包括75亿美元用于帮助建设电动汽车充电站。拜登希望在清洁汽车税收抵免、电池厂补贴、校车电气化和其他举措上增加超过1500亿美元的支出。国会可能不会提供所有这些支出，但即使是其中的一部分也将是支持电动汽车开发的意外之财，如果没有政府的巨额援助，电动汽车开发的风险会大得多。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb3cdc7ae94763d9e64dee84b0bcdfeb\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>The<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>加利福尼亚州凯特曼市的超级充电站是加利福尼亚州圣华金河谷的电动汽车充电站。照片拍摄于2021年7月12日。（卡罗琳·科尔/洛杉矶时报，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p></p><p> One sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.</p><p><blockquote>拜登政府和汽车行业之间关系日益密切的一个迹象是环保组织的批评，他们希望拜登走得更远。一些团体在称赞拜登即将推翻特朗普规则的同时，表示他行动太慢。倡导组织Evergreen Action在一份声明中表示：“设定到2030年电动汽车销量占40%-50%的远大目标是不够的。”“拜登政府应该……到2030年实现100%的电动汽车销量。”汽油动力汽车是濒危物种，只是灭绝何时发生的问题。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">yahoo finance</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-06 11:57</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>When President Obama&nbsp;ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and&nbsp;locked in the new rules, with no industry input.</p><p><blockquote>当奥巴马总统在2012年提高燃油经济性标准时，一些汽车制造商悄悄地提高了轮胎。到2025年，新规则将燃油效率要求提高了近一倍，迫使昂贵的新技术迅速采用。如果技术成熟得不够快，2018年的中途审查本应提供一个出口。但当唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)在2016年赢得总统大选时，奥巴马提前了最后期限并锁定了新规则，没有行业投入。</blockquote></p><p> The shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency,&nbsp;Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump&nbsp;sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.</p><p><blockquote>被回避的汽车行业向特朗普寻求救济，并得到了救济。就任总统两个月后，特朗普重新启动了中途审查，2020年特朗普大幅降低了2025年的目标。特朗普还试图阻止加州和其他24个州设定高于联邦水平的里程标准。这导致了该行业的分裂，一些汽车制造商站在特朗普一边，另一些则站在加州一边。</blockquote></p><p> President Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.</p><p><blockquote>拜登总统现在正在撤销特朗普的撤销，并再次推动燃油经济性的大幅提高。但他在汽车制造商的更多合作下做到了这一点，这也是奥巴马没有的优势：电动汽车比九年前走得更远，每个主要汽车制造商都在将电动汽车推向市场。现在，这使得汽车制造商更容易削减其车队的排放，同时具有讽刺意味的是，这使得政府能够软化仍使用汽油的车辆的效率目标。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>Automakers are on board</b></h3> A new Biden executive order sets a target for up to&nbsp;50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>汽车制造商纷纷加入</b></h3>拜登的一项新行政命令设定了到2030年销售的所有新车中高达50%实现电气化的目标，这意味着它们要么是全插电式汽车，要么是兼有燃气发动机和电动机的混合动力汽车，要么是氢动力汽车。请注意，这是一个“目标”，而不是一个需求。拜登的目标与汽车制造商已经宣布的目标基本一致，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>目标是到2035年全面淘汰汽油和柴油动力汽车。达不到目标的惩罚？什么都没有。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1af6cf6099a51f8b7b2be1a35f29a84\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>A sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>2021年7月21日星期三上午，宾夕法尼亚州斯普林镇希尔顿酒店Homewood Suites的ChargePoint车辆(EV)充电站上写着“仅限电动汽车充电”的标志。（摄影：Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p> Biden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump&nbsp;lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that&nbsp;would require a 3.7% annual improvement.</p><p><blockquote>拜登还将启动将汽油动力汽车燃油经济性标准提高到特朗普水平之上的进程。奥巴马的规定要求燃油经济性每年提高约5%。特朗普将这一比例下调至1.5%。据报道，拜登将提出新规则，要求每年提高3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> It will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">Bayerische Motoren Werke AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">Honda</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">Volkswagen AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">Volvo AB</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> and Jeep-Chrysler parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">Stellantis NV</a>—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.</p><p><blockquote>制定管理燃油经济性提高的联邦法规需要时间，但汽车行业似乎不太可能在幕后试图淡化这一点，而不是在之前的燃油经济性提高之争中。七家汽车制造商——<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">巴伐利亚汽车厂股份公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">本田</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">大众汽车公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">沃尔沃AB</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>和吉普-克莱斯勒母公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">斯特兰蒂斯公司</a>-提供了白宫在宣布拜登新的电动汽车目标时分发的支持声明。通用汽车、福特和Stellantis异口同声地表示：“我们期待与拜登政府合作……制定能够实现这些雄心勃勃目标的政策。”汽车制造商联手赞扬新的联邦法规的情况并不常见。</blockquote></p><p> There’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.</p><p><blockquote>对于汽车制造商来说，这是一个巨大的甜头：数十亿美元的联邦支出用于支持电动汽车的开发。国会正在通过的两党基础设施法案包括75亿美元用于帮助建设电动汽车充电站。拜登希望在清洁汽车税收抵免、电池厂补贴、校车电气化和其他举措上增加超过1500亿美元的支出。国会可能不会提供所有这些支出，但即使是其中的一部分也将是支持电动汽车开发的意外之财，如果没有政府的巨额援助，电动汽车开发的风险会大得多。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb3cdc7ae94763d9e64dee84b0bcdfeb\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>The<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>加利福尼亚州凯特曼市的超级充电站是加利福尼亚州圣华金河谷的电动汽车充电站。照片拍摄于2021年7月12日。（卡罗琳·科尔/洛杉矶时报，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p></p><p> One sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.</p><p><blockquote>拜登政府和汽车行业之间关系日益密切的一个迹象是环保组织的批评，他们希望拜登走得更远。一些团体在称赞拜登即将推翻特朗普规则的同时，表示他行动太慢。倡导组织Evergreen Action在一份声明中表示：“设定到2030年电动汽车销量占40%-50%的远大目标是不够的。”“拜登政府应该……到2030年实现100%的电动汽车销量。”汽油动力汽车是濒危物种，只是灭绝何时发生的问题。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-automakers-like-biden-more-than-obama-154815643.html\">yahoo finance</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-automakers-like-biden-more-than-obama-154815643.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193751771","content_text":"When President Obama ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and locked in the new rules, with no industry input.\nThe shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency, Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.\nPresident Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.\nAutomakers are on board\nA new Biden executive order sets a target for up to 50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as General Motors' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.\nA sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)\nBiden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that would require a 3.7% annual improvement.\nIt will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, Honda, Volkswagen AG, Volvo AB, General Motors, Ford and Jeep-Chrysler parent Stellantis NV—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.\nThere’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.\nThe Tesla Motors Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)\nOne sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"GM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":702,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173892402,"gmtCreate":1626651715906,"gmtModify":1633925325202,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Jjj","listText":"Jjj","text":"Jjj","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173892402","repostId":"1160548856","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":497,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150515266,"gmtCreate":1624921405655,"gmtModify":1633947127792,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/150515266","repostId":"1150095060","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150095060","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624874134,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1150095060?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-28 17:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO Week Ahead: DiDi makes its billion-dollar debut in a 17 IPO week<blockquote>美国IPO未来一周：滴滴在17个IPO周内首次亮相10亿美元</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150095060","media":"Renaissance Capital","summary":"17 IPOs are slated to raise $9.1 billion in this week, led by long-awaited Chinese ride-hailing giant $DiDi Global Inc.$.DiDi plans to raise $3.9 billion at a $67.5 billion market cap. DiDi is China’s dominant ride-hailing app, with 15 million drivers across 4,000 cities and towns. The unprofitable company saw revenue more than double in the 1Q21 as its business recovered post-pandemic.New and existing investors intend to purchase $1.3 billion of the IPO.Cybersecurity platform $SentinelOne, Inc$","content":"<p>17 IPOs are slated to raise $9.1 billion in this week, led by long-awaited Chinese ride-hailing giant<b>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">DiDi Global Inc.</a>.</b></p><p><blockquote>本周17起IPO预计筹集91亿美元，由期待已久的中国网约车巨头领投<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">滴滴全球公司。</a>.</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>DiDi</b>&nbsp;plans to raise $3.9 billion at a $67.5 billion market cap. DiDi is China’s dominant ride-hailing app, with 15 million drivers across 4,000 cities and towns. The unprofitable company saw revenue more than double in the 1Q21 as its business recovered post-pandemic.New and existing investors intend to purchase $1.3 billion of the IPO.</p><p><blockquote><b>迪迪</b>计划以675亿美元的市值筹集39亿美元。滴滴是中国占主导地位的打车应用程序，在4000个城镇拥有1500万司机。随着业务在疫情后复苏，这家尚未盈利的公司在2021年第一季度的收入增长了一倍多。新老投资者打算购买13亿美元的IPO。</blockquote></p><p> Cybersecurity platform&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S\">SentinelOne, Inc</a></b> plans to raise $880 million at an $8.2 billion market cap. SentinelOne's Singularity Platform is an AI-powered extended detection and response platform that ingests, correlates and queries petabytes of structured and unstructured data to provide autonomous cybersecurity defense. Fast growing and unprofitable, the company had over 4,700 customers as of 4/30/21, up from 2,700 a year prior.</p><p><blockquote>网络安全平台<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S\">哨兵一号公司</a></b>计划以82亿美元的市值筹集8.8亿美元。SentinelOne的Singularity平台是一个人工智能驱动的扩展检测和响应平台，可以摄取、关联和查询PB的结构化和非结构化数据，以提供自主网络安全防御。截至2011年4月30日，该公司快速增长且未盈利，拥有超过4,700名客户，高于一年前的2,700名。</blockquote></p><p> Turkish e-commerce platform&nbsp;<b>D-MARKET Electronic Services &amp; Trading</b>(HEPS) plans to raise $681 million at a $3.9 billion market cap. Operating under the name Hepsiburada, the company connected 33 million members, 9 million Active Customers, and a base of approximately 45 thousand Active Merchants in 2020. The company is fast growing but EBITDA swung negative in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>土耳其电商平台<b>D-MARKET电子服务与交易</b>(HEPS)计划以39亿美元的市值筹集6.81亿美元。该公司以Hepsiburada的名义运营，在2020年连接了3300万会员、900万活跃客户和约4.5万家活跃商户。该公司增长迅速，但EBITDA在2021年第一季度上转为负值。</blockquote></p><p> Doughnut brand&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNUT\"><b>Krispy Kreme, Inc.</a> </b>plans to raise $600 million at a $3.8 billion market cap. Krispy Kreme is an omni-channel business operating through a network of doughnut shops, partnerships with retailers, and an e-Commerce and delivery business. The company has a long track record and strong brand awareness, though its growth strategy is unproven.</p><p><blockquote>甜甜圈品牌<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNUT\"><b>克里斯皮·克雷姆公司。</b></a>计划以38亿美元的市值筹集6亿美元。Krispy Kreme是一家全渠道企业，通过甜甜圈店网络、与零售商的合作伙伴关系以及电子商务和送货业务运营。该公司拥有悠久的业绩记录和强大的品牌知名度，尽管其增长战略尚未得到证实。</blockquote></p><p> Legal solutions provider&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LZ\">LegalZoom.com, Inc</a> </b>plans to raise $488 million at a $5.3 billion market cap. LegalZoom states that it is a leading online platform for legal and compliance solutions, claiming that 10% of new LLCs and 5% of new corporations in the US were formed via LegalZoom in 2020. Profitable on an EBITDA basis in the 1Q21, the company operates across all 50 states and over 3,000 counties in the US.</p><p><blockquote>法律解决方案提供商<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LZ\">LegalZoom.com公司</a></b>计划以53亿美元的市值筹集4.88亿美元。LegalZoom表示，它是法律和合规解决方案的领先在线平台，并声称2020年美国10%的新有限责任公司和5%的新公司是通过LegalZoom成立的。该公司在2021年第一季度以EBITDA为基础实现盈利，业务遍及美国所有50个州和3,000多个县。</blockquote></p><p> Identity verification platform&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YOU\">Clear Secure, Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $376 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Clear Secure's secure identity platform uses to automate the identity verification process, with main offerings including CLEAR Plus, a consumer aviation subscription service, and two mobile apps. As of 5/31/21, Clear Secure's network included 38 airports, 26 sports and entertainment partners, and 67 Health Pass-enabled partners.</p><p><blockquote>身份验证平台<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YOU\">清晰安全公司。</a></b>计划以41亿美元的市值筹集3.76亿美元。Clear Secure的安全身份平台用于自动化身份验证过程，主要产品包括消费者航空订阅服务CLEAR Plus和两个移动应用程序。截至2011年5月31日，Clear Secure的网络包括38个机场、26个体育和娱乐合作伙伴以及67个支持健康通行证的合作伙伴。</blockquote></p><p> Chinese grocery delivery platform&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DDL\">Dingdong (Cayman) Limited</a> </b>plans to raise $343 million at a $6.0 billion market cap. With fresh groceries as its core product categories, Dingdong states that it is the fastest growing on-demand e-commerce company in China. Unprofitable with explosive growth, the company had a 10% share of the on-demand e-commerce market by GMV in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>中国杂货配送平台<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DDL\">叮咚（开曼）有限公司</a></b>计划以60亿美元的市值筹集3.43亿美元。叮咚表示，以生鲜杂货为核心产品类别，是中国发展最快的按需电子商务公司。由于爆炸式增长，该公司在2020年按GMV计算的按需电子商务市场份额为10%。</blockquote></p><p> SaaS solutions provider&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EVCM\">EverCommerce Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $325 million at a $3.4 billion market cap. EverCommerce is a leading provider of integrated, vertically-tailored SaaS solutions for service-based SMBs. The company serves over 500,000 customers across three core verticals: Home Services, Health Services, and Fitness &amp; Wellness Services.</p><p><blockquote>SaaS解决方案提供商<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EVCM\">EverCommerce公司。</a></b>计划以34亿美元的市值筹集3.25亿美元。EverCommerce是为服务型中小型企业提供垂直定制的集成SaaS解决方案的领先提供商。该公司为三个核心垂直领域的超过500,000名客户提供服务：家庭服务、健康服务以及健身与健康服务。</blockquote></p><p> Software provider&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTA\">Intapp, Inc.</a> </b>plans to raise $278 million at a $1.9 billion market cap. Intapp provides industry-specific, cloud-based software solutions for the professional and financial services industry globally. The company had over 1,600 clients as of March 31, 2021, and it currently has more than 20 clients with contracts greater than $1 million of ARR.</p><p><blockquote>软件提供商<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTA\">Intapp公司。</a></b>计划以19亿美元的市值筹集2.78亿美元。Intapp为全球专业和金融服务行业提供特定行业的基于云的软件解决方案。截至2021年3月31日，该公司拥有超过1,600名客户，目前有超过20名客户的合同ARR超过100万美元。</blockquote></p><p> Online manufacturing marketplace&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XMTR\">Xometry, Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $275 million at a $1.9 billion market cap. Xometry states that it is a leading AI-enabled marketplace for on-demand manufacturing. Its buyers include businesses ranging from self-funded start-ups to Fortune 100 companies. Since its inception, over 6.0 million parts have been manufactured through Xometry's platform.</p><p><blockquote>在线制造市场<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XMTR\">Xometry公司。</a></b>计划以19亿美元的市值筹集2.75亿美元。Xometry表示，它是一个领先的人工智能按需制造市场。其买家包括从自筹资金的初创企业到财富100强公司的企业。自成立以来，已通过Xometry平台制造了超过600万个零件。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IAS\">Integral Ad Science Holding LLC</a> </b>plans to raise $240 million at a $2.5 billion market cap. The company’s technology provides metrics designed to verify that digital ads are served to a real person, viewable on-screen, and appear in a brand-safe and suitable environment in the correct geography. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Integral Ad Science served over 2,000 customers as of 3/31/21.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IAS\">积分广告科学控股有限责任公司</a></b>计划以25亿美元的市值筹集2.4亿美元。该公司的技术提供了旨在验证数字广告是否提供给真人、可在屏幕上查看、并出现在正确地理位置的品牌安全和合适的环境中的指标。截至2011年3月31日，Integral Ad Science在EBIT实现盈利，为2,000多名客户提供服务。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Plus-sized women’s apparel brand&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CURV\">Torrid Holdings</a> </b>plans to raise $156 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. Torrid is the largest direct-to-consumer brand of women's plus-size apparel and intimates in North America by net sales. The profitable company markets directly to consumers via physical stores and its e-commerce platform, which represented a majority of sales in the 12 months ended 5/1/21.</p><p><blockquote>大码女装品牌<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CURV\">托瑞德控股</a></b>计划以21亿美元的市值筹集1.56亿美元。按净销售额计算，Torrid是北美最大的直接面向消费者的女性大码服装和内衣品牌。这家盈利的公司通过实体店及其电子商务平台直接向消费者营销，这占截至2011年5月1日的12个月销售额的大部分。</blockquote></p><p> Alzheimer’s biotech&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABOS\">Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $125 million at a $607 million market cap. The company's lead candidate, ACU193, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets amyloid-beta oligomers. ACU193 entered a Phase 1 trial in patients with mild dementia or cognitive impairment due to AD in the 2Q21, with data expected by year end 2022.</p><p><blockquote>阿尔茨海默病生物技术<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABOS\">Acumen制药公司。</a></b>计划以6.07亿美元的市值筹集1.25亿美元。该公司的主要候选药物ACU193是一种选择性靶向β淀粉样蛋白寡聚体的人源化单克隆抗体。ACU193在2021年第二季度进入了针对轻度痴呆或AD导致认知障碍患者的1期试验，预计将于2022年底获得数据。</blockquote></p><p> Digital financial services provider&nbsp;<b>AMTD Digital</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HKD\">$(HKD)$</a>) plans to raise $120 million at a $1.4 billion market cap. AMTD Digital states that it is the \"fusion reactor\" at the core of the AMTD SpiderNet ecosystem, operating a comprehensive digital solutions platform in Asia. Profitable with explosive growth, the company primarily generates revenue from fees and commissions in two lines of business.</p><p><blockquote>数字金融服务提供商<b>尚乘数科</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HKD\">$(港币)$</a>）计划以14亿美元的市值筹集1.2亿美元。尚乘数科表示，它是尚乘蜘蛛网生态系统核心的“聚变反应堆”，在亚洲运营着全面的数字化解决方案平台。该公司利润呈爆炸式增长，主要通过两个业务线的费用和佣金产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> Drug formulation developer&nbsp;<b>Aerovate Therapeutics</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AVTE\">$(AVTE)$</a>) plans to raise $100 million at a $325 million market cap. Aerovate's initial focus is on advancing AV-101, a dry powder inhaled formulation of imatinib for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The company has completed a Phase 1 study in healthy volunteers and expects to begin a Phase 2b/3 trial in PAH patients in the 2H21.</p><p><blockquote>药物制剂开发人员<b>Aerovate疗法</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AVTE\">$(AVTE)$</a>）计划以3.25亿美元的市值筹集1亿美元。Aerovate最初的重点是推进AV-101，这是一种用于治疗肺动脉高压（PAH）的伊马替尼干粉吸入制剂。该公司已完成针对健康志愿者的1期研究，并预计将于2021年下半年开始针对PAH患者的2b/3期试验。</blockquote></p><p> Neuromodulation device provider<b>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVRX\">CVRx Inc</a> </b>plans to raise $100 million at a $333 million market cap. CVRx manufactures and markets its minimally invasive neuromodulation solutions on its proprietary BAROSTIM platform. The company's states that its BAROSTEM NEO product is the first and only commercially available neuromodulation device indicated to improve symptoms for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.</p><p><blockquote>神经调节设备提供商<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVRX\">CVRx公司</a></b>计划以3.33亿美元的市值筹集1亿美元。CVRx在其专有的BAROSTIM平台上制造和销售其微创神经调节解决方案。该公司表示，其BAROSTEM NEO产品是第一款也是唯一一款可用于改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者症状的商用神经调节设备。</blockquote></p><p> Belgium-listed&nbsp;<b>Nyxoah</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYXH\">$(NYXH)$</a>) plans to raise $87 million at an $803 million market cap. Nyxoah's lead product is the Genio system, a CE-marked, minimally-invasive hypoglossal neurostimulation therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. The company began generating revenue from Genio in Europe in July 2020 and is currently conducting a pivotal trial designed to support marketing authorization in the US.</p><p><blockquote>比利时上市<b>尼克斯阿</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYXH\">$(NYXH)$</a>）计划以8.03亿美元的市值筹集8700万美元。Nyxoah的主导产品是Genio系统，这是一种通过CE认证的微创舌下神经刺激疗法，用于治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。该公司于2020年7月开始在欧洲从Genio产生收入，目前正在进行一项旨在支持美国营销授权的关键试验。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58f28d5f7f3b8e686c0bd006c2968b99\" tg-width=\"1131\" tg-height=\"684\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/508f1118f1d92b2b76391bc3610bd6c4\" tg-width=\"1131\" tg-height=\"657\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed04cd42fa30b460fcf67e07efa6ddc7\" tg-width=\"1130\" tg-height=\"166\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 6/24/21, the Renaissance IPO Index was up 2.7% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 13.6%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 1.5% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 10.3%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Smoore International and EQT Partners.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至2011年6月24日，文艺复兴IPO指数今年迄今上涨2.7%，而标普500上涨13.6%。Renaissance Capital的IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括Snowflake（SNOW）和Palantir Technologies（PLTR）。Renaissance International IPO指数今年迄今下跌1.5%，而ACWX指数上涨10.3%。Renaissance Capital的国际IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括思摩尔国际和殷拓合伙人。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603787993745","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO Week Ahead: DiDi makes its billion-dollar debut in a 17 IPO week<blockquote>美国IPO未来一周：滴滴在17个IPO周内首次亮相10亿美元</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO Week Ahead: DiDi makes its billion-dollar debut in a 17 IPO week<blockquote>美国IPO未来一周：滴滴在17个IPO周内首次亮相10亿美元</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Renaissance Capital</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-28 17:55</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>17 IPOs are slated to raise $9.1 billion in this week, led by long-awaited Chinese ride-hailing giant<b>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">DiDi Global Inc.</a>.</b></p><p><blockquote>本周17起IPO预计筹集91亿美元，由期待已久的中国网约车巨头领投<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">滴滴全球公司。</a>.</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>DiDi</b>&nbsp;plans to raise $3.9 billion at a $67.5 billion market cap. DiDi is China’s dominant ride-hailing app, with 15 million drivers across 4,000 cities and towns. The unprofitable company saw revenue more than double in the 1Q21 as its business recovered post-pandemic.New and existing investors intend to purchase $1.3 billion of the IPO.</p><p><blockquote><b>迪迪</b>计划以675亿美元的市值筹集39亿美元。滴滴是中国占主导地位的打车应用程序，在4000个城镇拥有1500万司机。随着业务在疫情后复苏，这家尚未盈利的公司在2021年第一季度的收入增长了一倍多。新老投资者打算购买13亿美元的IPO。</blockquote></p><p> Cybersecurity platform&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S\">SentinelOne, Inc</a></b> plans to raise $880 million at an $8.2 billion market cap. SentinelOne's Singularity Platform is an AI-powered extended detection and response platform that ingests, correlates and queries petabytes of structured and unstructured data to provide autonomous cybersecurity defense. Fast growing and unprofitable, the company had over 4,700 customers as of 4/30/21, up from 2,700 a year prior.</p><p><blockquote>网络安全平台<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S\">哨兵一号公司</a></b>计划以82亿美元的市值筹集8.8亿美元。SentinelOne的Singularity平台是一个人工智能驱动的扩展检测和响应平台，可以摄取、关联和查询PB的结构化和非结构化数据，以提供自主网络安全防御。截至2011年4月30日，该公司快速增长且未盈利，拥有超过4,700名客户，高于一年前的2,700名。</blockquote></p><p> Turkish e-commerce platform&nbsp;<b>D-MARKET Electronic Services &amp; Trading</b>(HEPS) plans to raise $681 million at a $3.9 billion market cap. Operating under the name Hepsiburada, the company connected 33 million members, 9 million Active Customers, and a base of approximately 45 thousand Active Merchants in 2020. The company is fast growing but EBITDA swung negative in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>土耳其电商平台<b>D-MARKET电子服务与交易</b>(HEPS)计划以39亿美元的市值筹集6.81亿美元。该公司以Hepsiburada的名义运营，在2020年连接了3300万会员、900万活跃客户和约4.5万家活跃商户。该公司增长迅速，但EBITDA在2021年第一季度上转为负值。</blockquote></p><p> Doughnut brand&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNUT\"><b>Krispy Kreme, Inc.</a> </b>plans to raise $600 million at a $3.8 billion market cap. Krispy Kreme is an omni-channel business operating through a network of doughnut shops, partnerships with retailers, and an e-Commerce and delivery business. The company has a long track record and strong brand awareness, though its growth strategy is unproven.</p><p><blockquote>甜甜圈品牌<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNUT\"><b>克里斯皮·克雷姆公司。</b></a>计划以38亿美元的市值筹集6亿美元。Krispy Kreme是一家全渠道企业，通过甜甜圈店网络、与零售商的合作伙伴关系以及电子商务和送货业务运营。该公司拥有悠久的业绩记录和强大的品牌知名度，尽管其增长战略尚未得到证实。</blockquote></p><p> Legal solutions provider&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LZ\">LegalZoom.com, Inc</a> </b>plans to raise $488 million at a $5.3 billion market cap. LegalZoom states that it is a leading online platform for legal and compliance solutions, claiming that 10% of new LLCs and 5% of new corporations in the US were formed via LegalZoom in 2020. Profitable on an EBITDA basis in the 1Q21, the company operates across all 50 states and over 3,000 counties in the US.</p><p><blockquote>法律解决方案提供商<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LZ\">LegalZoom.com公司</a></b>计划以53亿美元的市值筹集4.88亿美元。LegalZoom表示，它是法律和合规解决方案的领先在线平台，并声称2020年美国10%的新有限责任公司和5%的新公司是通过LegalZoom成立的。该公司在2021年第一季度以EBITDA为基础实现盈利，业务遍及美国所有50个州和3,000多个县。</blockquote></p><p> Identity verification platform&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YOU\">Clear Secure, Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $376 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Clear Secure's secure identity platform uses to automate the identity verification process, with main offerings including CLEAR Plus, a consumer aviation subscription service, and two mobile apps. As of 5/31/21, Clear Secure's network included 38 airports, 26 sports and entertainment partners, and 67 Health Pass-enabled partners.</p><p><blockquote>身份验证平台<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YOU\">清晰安全公司。</a></b>计划以41亿美元的市值筹集3.76亿美元。Clear Secure的安全身份平台用于自动化身份验证过程，主要产品包括消费者航空订阅服务CLEAR Plus和两个移动应用程序。截至2011年5月31日，Clear Secure的网络包括38个机场、26个体育和娱乐合作伙伴以及67个支持健康通行证的合作伙伴。</blockquote></p><p> Chinese grocery delivery platform&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DDL\">Dingdong (Cayman) Limited</a> </b>plans to raise $343 million at a $6.0 billion market cap. With fresh groceries as its core product categories, Dingdong states that it is the fastest growing on-demand e-commerce company in China. Unprofitable with explosive growth, the company had a 10% share of the on-demand e-commerce market by GMV in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>中国杂货配送平台<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DDL\">叮咚（开曼）有限公司</a></b>计划以60亿美元的市值筹集3.43亿美元。叮咚表示，以生鲜杂货为核心产品类别，是中国发展最快的按需电子商务公司。由于爆炸式增长，该公司在2020年按GMV计算的按需电子商务市场份额为10%。</blockquote></p><p> SaaS solutions provider&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EVCM\">EverCommerce Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $325 million at a $3.4 billion market cap. EverCommerce is a leading provider of integrated, vertically-tailored SaaS solutions for service-based SMBs. The company serves over 500,000 customers across three core verticals: Home Services, Health Services, and Fitness &amp; Wellness Services.</p><p><blockquote>SaaS解决方案提供商<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EVCM\">EverCommerce公司。</a></b>计划以34亿美元的市值筹集3.25亿美元。EverCommerce是为服务型中小型企业提供垂直定制的集成SaaS解决方案的领先提供商。该公司为三个核心垂直领域的超过500,000名客户提供服务：家庭服务、健康服务以及健身与健康服务。</blockquote></p><p> Software provider&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTA\">Intapp, Inc.</a> </b>plans to raise $278 million at a $1.9 billion market cap. Intapp provides industry-specific, cloud-based software solutions for the professional and financial services industry globally. The company had over 1,600 clients as of March 31, 2021, and it currently has more than 20 clients with contracts greater than $1 million of ARR.</p><p><blockquote>软件提供商<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTA\">Intapp公司。</a></b>计划以19亿美元的市值筹集2.78亿美元。Intapp为全球专业和金融服务行业提供特定行业的基于云的软件解决方案。截至2021年3月31日，该公司拥有超过1,600名客户，目前有超过20名客户的合同ARR超过100万美元。</blockquote></p><p> Online manufacturing marketplace&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XMTR\">Xometry, Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $275 million at a $1.9 billion market cap. Xometry states that it is a leading AI-enabled marketplace for on-demand manufacturing. Its buyers include businesses ranging from self-funded start-ups to Fortune 100 companies. Since its inception, over 6.0 million parts have been manufactured through Xometry's platform.</p><p><blockquote>在线制造市场<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XMTR\">Xometry公司。</a></b>计划以19亿美元的市值筹集2.75亿美元。Xometry表示，它是一个领先的人工智能按需制造市场。其买家包括从自筹资金的初创企业到财富100强公司的企业。自成立以来，已通过Xometry平台制造了超过600万个零件。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IAS\">Integral Ad Science Holding LLC</a> </b>plans to raise $240 million at a $2.5 billion market cap. The company’s technology provides metrics designed to verify that digital ads are served to a real person, viewable on-screen, and appear in a brand-safe and suitable environment in the correct geography. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Integral Ad Science served over 2,000 customers as of 3/31/21.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IAS\">积分广告科学控股有限责任公司</a></b>计划以25亿美元的市值筹集2.4亿美元。该公司的技术提供了旨在验证数字广告是否提供给真人、可在屏幕上查看、并出现在正确地理位置的品牌安全和合适的环境中的指标。截至2011年3月31日，Integral Ad Science在EBIT实现盈利，为2,000多名客户提供服务。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Plus-sized women’s apparel brand&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CURV\">Torrid Holdings</a> </b>plans to raise $156 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. Torrid is the largest direct-to-consumer brand of women's plus-size apparel and intimates in North America by net sales. The profitable company markets directly to consumers via physical stores and its e-commerce platform, which represented a majority of sales in the 12 months ended 5/1/21.</p><p><blockquote>大码女装品牌<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CURV\">托瑞德控股</a></b>计划以21亿美元的市值筹集1.56亿美元。按净销售额计算，Torrid是北美最大的直接面向消费者的女性大码服装和内衣品牌。这家盈利的公司通过实体店及其电子商务平台直接向消费者营销，这占截至2011年5月1日的12个月销售额的大部分。</blockquote></p><p> Alzheimer’s biotech&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABOS\">Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</a></b> plans to raise $125 million at a $607 million market cap. The company's lead candidate, ACU193, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets amyloid-beta oligomers. ACU193 entered a Phase 1 trial in patients with mild dementia or cognitive impairment due to AD in the 2Q21, with data expected by year end 2022.</p><p><blockquote>阿尔茨海默病生物技术<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABOS\">Acumen制药公司。</a></b>计划以6.07亿美元的市值筹集1.25亿美元。该公司的主要候选药物ACU193是一种选择性靶向β淀粉样蛋白寡聚体的人源化单克隆抗体。ACU193在2021年第二季度进入了针对轻度痴呆或AD导致认知障碍患者的1期试验，预计将于2022年底获得数据。</blockquote></p><p> Digital financial services provider&nbsp;<b>AMTD Digital</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HKD\">$(HKD)$</a>) plans to raise $120 million at a $1.4 billion market cap. AMTD Digital states that it is the \"fusion reactor\" at the core of the AMTD SpiderNet ecosystem, operating a comprehensive digital solutions platform in Asia. Profitable with explosive growth, the company primarily generates revenue from fees and commissions in two lines of business.</p><p><blockquote>数字金融服务提供商<b>尚乘数科</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HKD\">$(港币)$</a>）计划以14亿美元的市值筹集1.2亿美元。尚乘数科表示，它是尚乘蜘蛛网生态系统核心的“聚变反应堆”，在亚洲运营着全面的数字化解决方案平台。该公司利润呈爆炸式增长，主要通过两个业务线的费用和佣金产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> Drug formulation developer&nbsp;<b>Aerovate Therapeutics</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AVTE\">$(AVTE)$</a>) plans to raise $100 million at a $325 million market cap. Aerovate's initial focus is on advancing AV-101, a dry powder inhaled formulation of imatinib for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The company has completed a Phase 1 study in healthy volunteers and expects to begin a Phase 2b/3 trial in PAH patients in the 2H21.</p><p><blockquote>药物制剂开发人员<b>Aerovate疗法</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AVTE\">$(AVTE)$</a>）计划以3.25亿美元的市值筹集1亿美元。Aerovate最初的重点是推进AV-101，这是一种用于治疗肺动脉高压（PAH）的伊马替尼干粉吸入制剂。该公司已完成针对健康志愿者的1期研究，并预计将于2021年下半年开始针对PAH患者的2b/3期试验。</blockquote></p><p> Neuromodulation device provider<b>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVRX\">CVRx Inc</a> </b>plans to raise $100 million at a $333 million market cap. CVRx manufactures and markets its minimally invasive neuromodulation solutions on its proprietary BAROSTIM platform. The company's states that its BAROSTEM NEO product is the first and only commercially available neuromodulation device indicated to improve symptoms for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.</p><p><blockquote>神经调节设备提供商<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVRX\">CVRx公司</a></b>计划以3.33亿美元的市值筹集1亿美元。CVRx在其专有的BAROSTIM平台上制造和销售其微创神经调节解决方案。该公司表示，其BAROSTEM NEO产品是第一款也是唯一一款可用于改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者症状的商用神经调节设备。</blockquote></p><p> Belgium-listed&nbsp;<b>Nyxoah</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYXH\">$(NYXH)$</a>) plans to raise $87 million at an $803 million market cap. Nyxoah's lead product is the Genio system, a CE-marked, minimally-invasive hypoglossal neurostimulation therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. The company began generating revenue from Genio in Europe in July 2020 and is currently conducting a pivotal trial designed to support marketing authorization in the US.</p><p><blockquote>比利时上市<b>尼克斯阿</b>(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYXH\">$(NYXH)$</a>）计划以8.03亿美元的市值筹集8700万美元。Nyxoah的主导产品是Genio系统，这是一种通过CE认证的微创舌下神经刺激疗法，用于治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。该公司于2020年7月开始在欧洲从Genio产生收入，目前正在进行一项旨在支持美国营销授权的关键试验。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58f28d5f7f3b8e686c0bd006c2968b99\" tg-width=\"1131\" tg-height=\"684\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/508f1118f1d92b2b76391bc3610bd6c4\" tg-width=\"1131\" tg-height=\"657\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed04cd42fa30b460fcf67e07efa6ddc7\" tg-width=\"1130\" tg-height=\"166\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 6/24/21, the Renaissance IPO Index was up 2.7% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 13.6%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 1.5% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 10.3%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Smoore International and EQT Partners.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至2011年6月24日，文艺复兴IPO指数今年迄今上涨2.7%，而标普500上涨13.6%。Renaissance Capital的IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括Snowflake（SNOW）和Palantir Technologies（PLTR）。Renaissance International IPO指数今年迄今下跌1.5%，而ACWX指数上涨10.3%。Renaissance Capital的国际IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括思摩尔国际和殷拓合伙人。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83318/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-DiDi-makes-its-billion-dollar-debut-in-a-17-IPO-week\">Renaissance Capital</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CVRX":"CVRx, Inc.","S":"SentinelOne, Inc","IAS":"Integral Ad Science Holding","DNUT":"Krispy Kreme, Inc.","DDL":"叮咚买菜","DIDI":"滴滴(已退市)","CURV":"Torrid Holdings","ABOS":"Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","HEPS":"D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading","EVCM":"EverCommerce Inc.","YOU":"Clear Secure, Inc.","LZ":"LegalZoom.com, Inc","XMTR":"Xometry, Inc.","INTA":"Intapp, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83318/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-DiDi-makes-its-billion-dollar-debut-in-a-17-IPO-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150095060","content_text":"17 IPOs are slated to raise $9.1 billion in this week, led by long-awaited Chinese ride-hailing giant DiDi Global Inc..\nDiDi plans to raise $3.9 billion at a $67.5 billion market cap. DiDi is China’s dominant ride-hailing app, with 15 million drivers across 4,000 cities and towns. The unprofitable company saw revenue more than double in the 1Q21 as its business recovered post-pandemic.New and existing investors intend to purchase $1.3 billion of the IPO.\nCybersecurity platform SentinelOne, Inc plans to raise $880 million at an $8.2 billion market cap. SentinelOne's Singularity Platform is an AI-powered extended detection and response platform that ingests, correlates and queries petabytes of structured and unstructured data to provide autonomous cybersecurity defense. Fast growing and unprofitable, the company had over 4,700 customers as of 4/30/21, up from 2,700 a year prior.\nTurkish e-commerce platform D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading(HEPS) plans to raise $681 million at a $3.9 billion market cap. Operating under the name Hepsiburada, the company connected 33 million members, 9 million Active Customers, and a base of approximately 45 thousand Active Merchants in 2020. The company is fast growing but EBITDA swung negative in the 1Q21.\nDoughnut brand Krispy Kreme, Inc. plans to raise $600 million at a $3.8 billion market cap. Krispy Kreme is an omni-channel business operating through a network of doughnut shops, partnerships with retailers, and an e-Commerce and delivery business. The company has a long track record and strong brand awareness, though its growth strategy is unproven.\nLegal solutions provider LegalZoom.com, Inc plans to raise $488 million at a $5.3 billion market cap. LegalZoom states that it is a leading online platform for legal and compliance solutions, claiming that 10% of new LLCs and 5% of new corporations in the US were formed via LegalZoom in 2020. Profitable on an EBITDA basis in the 1Q21, the company operates across all 50 states and over 3,000 counties in the US.\nIdentity verification platform Clear Secure, Inc. plans to raise $376 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Clear Secure's secure identity platform uses to automate the identity verification process, with main offerings including CLEAR Plus, a consumer aviation subscription service, and two mobile apps. As of 5/31/21, Clear Secure's network included 38 airports, 26 sports and entertainment partners, and 67 Health Pass-enabled partners.\nChinese grocery delivery platform Dingdong (Cayman) Limited plans to raise $343 million at a $6.0 billion market cap. With fresh groceries as its core product categories, Dingdong states that it is the fastest growing on-demand e-commerce company in China. Unprofitable with explosive growth, the company had a 10% share of the on-demand e-commerce market by GMV in 2020.\nSaaS solutions provider EverCommerce Inc. plans to raise $325 million at a $3.4 billion market cap. EverCommerce is a leading provider of integrated, vertically-tailored SaaS solutions for service-based SMBs. The company serves over 500,000 customers across three core verticals: Home Services, Health Services, and Fitness & Wellness Services.\nSoftware provider Intapp, Inc. plans to raise $278 million at a $1.9 billion market cap. Intapp provides industry-specific, cloud-based software solutions for the professional and financial services industry globally. The company had over 1,600 clients as of March 31, 2021, and it currently has more than 20 clients with contracts greater than $1 million of ARR.\nOnline manufacturing marketplace Xometry, Inc. plans to raise $275 million at a $1.9 billion market cap. Xometry states that it is a leading AI-enabled marketplace for on-demand manufacturing. Its buyers include businesses ranging from self-funded start-ups to Fortune 100 companies. Since its inception, over 6.0 million parts have been manufactured through Xometry's platform.\nIntegral Ad Science Holding LLC plans to raise $240 million at a $2.5 billion market cap. The company’s technology provides metrics designed to verify that digital ads are served to a real person, viewable on-screen, and appear in a brand-safe and suitable environment in the correct geography. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Integral Ad Science served over 2,000 customers as of 3/31/21.\nPlus-sized women’s apparel brand Torrid Holdings plans to raise $156 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. Torrid is the largest direct-to-consumer brand of women's plus-size apparel and intimates in North America by net sales. The profitable company markets directly to consumers via physical stores and its e-commerce platform, which represented a majority of sales in the 12 months ended 5/1/21.\nAlzheimer’s biotech Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. plans to raise $125 million at a $607 million market cap. The company's lead candidate, ACU193, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets amyloid-beta oligomers. ACU193 entered a Phase 1 trial in patients with mild dementia or cognitive impairment due to AD in the 2Q21, with data expected by year end 2022.\nDigital financial services provider AMTD Digital($(HKD)$) plans to raise $120 million at a $1.4 billion market cap. AMTD Digital states that it is the \"fusion reactor\" at the core of the AMTD SpiderNet ecosystem, operating a comprehensive digital solutions platform in Asia. Profitable with explosive growth, the company primarily generates revenue from fees and commissions in two lines of business.\nDrug formulation developer Aerovate Therapeutics($(AVTE)$) plans to raise $100 million at a $325 million market cap. Aerovate's initial focus is on advancing AV-101, a dry powder inhaled formulation of imatinib for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The company has completed a Phase 1 study in healthy volunteers and expects to begin a Phase 2b/3 trial in PAH patients in the 2H21.\nNeuromodulation device provider CVRx Inc plans to raise $100 million at a $333 million market cap. CVRx manufactures and markets its minimally invasive neuromodulation solutions on its proprietary BAROSTIM platform. The company's states that its BAROSTEM NEO product is the first and only commercially available neuromodulation device indicated to improve symptoms for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.\nBelgium-listed Nyxoah($(NYXH)$) plans to raise $87 million at an $803 million market cap. Nyxoah's lead product is the Genio system, a CE-marked, minimally-invasive hypoglossal neurostimulation therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. The company began generating revenue from Genio in Europe in July 2020 and is currently conducting a pivotal trial designed to support marketing authorization in the US.\n\nIPO Market Snapshot\nThe Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 6/24/21, the Renaissance IPO Index was up 2.7% year-to-date, while the S&P 500 was up 13.6%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 1.5% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 10.3%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Smoore International and EQT Partners.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"YOU":0.9,"INTA":0.9,"ABOS":0.9,"XMTR":0.9,"DDL":0.9,"IAS":0.9,"S":0.9,"HEPS":0.9,"CVRX":0.9,"CURV":0.9,"DNUT":0.9,"EVCM":0.9,"HKIB":0.9,"LZ":0.9,"DIDI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":389,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":120152817,"gmtCreate":1624316719339,"gmtModify":1634008057094,"author":{"id":"3579566667655239","authorId":"3579566667655239","name":"EstherTurtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4134f385638a36faba2817c9082db366","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579566667655239","idStr":"3579566667655239"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/120152817","repostId":"1146982088","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146982088","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624259620,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146982088?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-21 15:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis<blockquote>鲍威尔刚刚发射了2万亿美元的“热寻导弹”：Zoltan解释美联储如何开启下一次回购危机</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146982088","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpect","content":"<p>Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpected hawkish pivot, we noted that there were two tangible, if less noted changes: the Fed adjusted the two key \"administered\" rates, raising both the IOER and RRP rates by 5 basis points (as correctly predicted by Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wrightson, Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo while Citi, Oxford Economics, Jefferies, Credit Suisse, Standard Chartered, BMO were wrong in predicting no rate change), in an effort to push the Effective Fed Funds rate higher and away from its imminent rendezvous with 0%.</p><p><blockquote>上周，在市场对美联储意外鹰派转向的震惊反应中，我们注意到有两个切实但不太引人注目的变化：美联储调整了两个关键的“管理”利率，将IOER和RRP利率都提高了5个基点（正如美国银行、摩根大通、莱特森、德意志银行和富国银行正确预测的那样，而花旗、牛津经济研究院、杰富瑞、瑞士信贷、渣打银行、蒙特利尔银行错误地预测利率不会变化），以推动有效联邦基金利率走高，远离即将到来的0%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31e3c93e7ae558cd9f2fdb7e4a2769f1\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"377\">What does this mean? As Curvature Securities repo guru,Scott Skyrm wrote last week, \"clearly the Fed intends to move overnight rates above zero and drain the RRP&nbsp; facility of cash.\" Unfortunately, the end result would be precisely the opposite of what the Fed had wanted to achieve.</p><p><blockquote>这是什么意思？正如Curvature Securities回购专家Scott Skyrm上周写道，“显然，美联储打算将隔夜利率提高到零以上，并耗尽RRP工具的现金。”不幸的是，最终结果将与美联储想要达到的目标完全相反。</blockquote></p><p> But what does this really mean for overnight rates and RRP volume? As Skyrm further noted, the increase in the IOER should pull the daily fed funds rate 5 basis points higher and, in turn, put upward pressure on Repo GC. Combined with the 5 basis point increase in RRP, GC should move a solid 5 basis points higher, which it has.</p><p><blockquote>但这对于隔夜利率和建议零售价交易量到底意味着什么？正如Skyrm进一步指出的那样，IOER的上升应该会将每日联邦基金利率拉高5个基点，进而给回购GC带来上行压力。结合RRP增加5个基点，GC应该会大幅上涨5个基点，事实也确实如此。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8b99df7af1731b4bdcbcf072dcf39ce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"272\">The problem, as Skyrm warned, is that the Fed's technical adjustment would do nothing to ease the RRP volume:</p><p><blockquote>正如Skyrm警告的那样，问题在于美联储的技术调整无助于缓解建议零售额：</blockquote></p><p>   When market Repo rates were at 0% and the RRP rate was at zero, ~$500 billion went into the RRP. Well, if both market Repo rates and the RRP rate are 5 basis points higher, there's no reason to pull cash out of the RRP. For example, if GC rates moved to .05% and the RRP rate stayed at zero, investor preferences to invest at a higher rate would remove cash from the RRP.  Bottom line: with both market rates and RRP at .05%, there's really no economic incentive for cash investors to move cash to the Repo market. Or, as we summarized, \"<i>the Fed's rate change may have zero impact on the Fed's reverse repo facility, or the record half a trillion in cash parked there.\"</i></p><p><blockquote>当市场回购利率为0%且RRP利率为零时，约5000亿美元进入RRP。好吧，如果市场回购利率和RRP利率都高出5个基点，就没有理由从RRP中提取现金。例如，如果GC利率升至0.05%，而RRP利率保持在零，投资者以更高利率投资的偏好将从RRP中移除现金。底线：由于市场利率和建议零售价均为0.05%，现金投资者确实没有经济动机将现金转移到回购市场。或者，正如我们总结的那样，“<i>美联储的利率变化可能对美联储的逆回购工具或创纪录的5000亿现金产生零影响。”</i></blockquote></p><p> In retrospect, boy was that an understatement, because just one day later the already record usage of the Fed's Reverse Repo facility spiked by a record 50%, exploding to a staggering $756 billion (it closed Friday at $747 billion) as the GSEs.</p><p><blockquote>回想起来，这是一种轻描淡写的说法，因为仅仅一天后，美联储逆回购工具的使用量就飙升了创纪录的50%，随着GSE的出现，飙升至惊人的7560亿美元（周五收盘价为7470亿美元）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fba18d7808300abc3bdf4ffaa3d5fb6\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"273\">Needless to say, flooding the Fed's RRP facility and sterilizing reserves is hardly what the Fed had intended, and as Credit Suisse's own repo guru (and former NY Fed staffer) Zoltan Pozsar wrote in his post-mortem, \"<b>the re-priced RRP facility will become a problem for the banking system fast:</b><b><u>the banking system is going from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market</u></b><b>).\"</b></p><p><blockquote>不用说，淹没美联储的建议零售价工具和冲销准备金几乎不是美联储的本意，正如瑞士信贷自己的回购专家（前纽约联储工作人员）Zoltan Pozsar在他的事后分析中所写的那样，“<b>重新定价的建议零售价融资将很快成为银行系统的一个问题：</b><b><u>银行体系正在从资产约束（存款大量涌入，但除了美联储之外无处可贷）转变为负债约束（存款不断流失，除了货币市场之外无处可替代）</u></b><b>).\"</b></blockquote></p><p> What he means by that is that whereas previously the RRP rate of 0.00% did not<i>reward</i>allocation of inert, excess reserves but merely provided a place to park them, now that the Fed is providing a generous yield pick up compared to rates offered by trillions in Bills, we are about to see a sea-change in the overnight, money-market, as trillions in capital reallocate away from traditional investments and into the the Fed's RRP.</p><p><blockquote>他的意思是，以前0.00%的RRP利率没有<i>奖励</i>分配惰性的超额准备金，但只是提供了一个存放它们的地方，现在美联储提供的收益率与数万亿票据提供的利率相比大幅上升，我们即将看到隔夜货币市场发生翻天覆地的变化，数万亿资本从传统投资重新分配到美联储的建议零售价。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, as Pozsar puts it, \"the RRP facility started to sterilize reserves... with more to come.\" And just as Deutsche Bank explained why the Fed's signaling was an r* policy error, to Pozsar, the Fed<i><b>also</b></i>made a policy error - only this time with its technical rates - by steriling reserves because \"it’s one thing to raise the rate on the RRP facility when an increase was not strictly speaking necessary, and it’s another to raise it “unduly” high – as one money fund manager put it, “<b>yesterday we could not even get a basis points a year; to get endless paper at five basis points from the most trusted counterparty is a dream come true.\"</b></p><p><blockquote>换句话说，正如Pozsar所说，“RRP设施开始对储备进行消毒……还会有更多储备。”而就在德意志银行向Pozsar解释为什么美联储的信号是一个r*政策错误时，美联储<i><b>也</b></i>犯了一个政策错误——只是这次是技术利率——冲销准备金，因为“当严格来说没有必要提高RRP设施的利率时，提高RRP设施的利率是一回事，而将其提高到‘过高’是另一回事——正如一位货币基金经理所说，”<b>昨天，我们一年甚至拿不到一个基点；以五个基点从最值得信赖的交易对手那里获得无尽的票据是梦想成真。”</b></blockquote></p><p> He's right: while 0bps may have been viewed by many as too low, it was hardly catastrophic for now (Credit Suisse was one of those predicting no administered rate hike),<b>5bps is too generous</b>, according to Pozsar who warns that the new reverse repo rate<b>will upset the state of \"singularity\"</b>and \"like heat-seeking missiles, money market investors move hundreds of billions, making sharp, 90º turns hunting for even a basis point of yield at the zero bound –<b>at 5 bps, money funds have an incentive to trade out of all their Treasury bills and park cash at the RRP facility.\"</b></p><p><blockquote>他是对的：虽然许多人可能认为0个基点太低，但目前这很难说是灾难性的（瑞士信贷是预测不会有管理加息的机构之一），<b>5bps太慷慨了</b>Pozsar警告说，新的逆回购利率<b>将颠覆“奇点”状态</b>“就像热寻的导弹一样，货币市场投资者转移了数千亿美元，急转弯90度，在零边界寻找哪怕一个基点的收益率——<b>在5个基点的利率下，货币基金有动力出售所有国库券并将现金存放在RRP设施中。”</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Indeed, as shown below, bills yield less than 5 bps out to 6 months,<b>and money funds have over $2 trillion of bills.</b>They got an the incentive to sell, while others have the incentive to buy: institutions whose deposits have been “tolerated” by banks until now earning zero interest have an incentive to harvest the 0-5 bps range the bill curve has to offer. Putting your cash at a basis point in bills is better than deposits at zero.<b>So the sterilization of reserves begins, and so the o/n RRP facility turns from a largely passive tool that provided an interest rate floor to the deposits that large banks have been pushing away, into an active tool that \"sucks\" the deposits away that banks decided to retain.</b></p><p><blockquote>事实上，如下图所示，6个月的票据收益率不到5个基点，<b>货币基金拥有超过2万亿美元的票据。</b>他们有卖出的动机，而其他人有买入的动机：那些存款一直被银行“容忍”到目前为止赚取零利息的机构有动力获得票据曲线提供的0-5个基点的范围。将现金以一个基点存入票据比零存款要好。<b>因此，准备金冲销开始了，因此o/n RRP工具从一个为大型银行一直在推走的存款提供利率下限的基本上被动的工具，变成了一个“吸走”银行决定保留的存款的主动工具。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf593f7b1d2d665f39384ed6a998d3bf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"403\">To help readers visualize what is going on, the Credit Suisse strategist suggest the following \"extreme\" thought experiment: most of the “Covid-19” deposits currently with banks go into the bill market where rates are better. Money funds sell bills to institutional investors that currently keep their cash at banks, and money funds swap bills for o/n RRPs. Said (somewhat) simply, while previously the Fed provided banks with a convenient place to park reserves, it now will actively drain reserves to the point where we may end up with another 2019-style repo crisis, as most financial institutions suddenly find themsleves with<i><b>too few</b></i>intraday reserves, forcing them to use the Fed's other funding facilities (such as FX swap lines) to remain consistently solvent.</p><p><blockquote>为了帮助读者直观地了解正在发生的事情，瑞士信贷策略师建议进行以下“极端”的思想实验：目前银行的大部分“Covid-19”存款都进入了利率更好的票据市场。货币基金向目前将现金存放在银行的机构投资者出售票据，货币基金将票据交换为o/N RRP。（有点）简单地说，虽然美联储以前为银行提供了一个方便的存放准备金的地方，但现在它将积极耗尽准备金，以至于我们可能最终会陷入另一场2019年式的回购危机，因为大多数金融机构突然发现自己与<i><b>太少</b></i>日内储备，迫使它们使用美联储的其他融资工具（如外汇掉期额度）来保持持续的偿付能力。</blockquote></p><p> This process is not overnight. It will take a few weeks to observe the fallout from the Fed's reserve sterilization.</p><p><blockquote>这个过程不是一蹴而就的。需要几周时间才能观察到美联储准备金冲销的影响。</blockquote></p><p> And here is why the problem is similar to the repo crisis of 2019: soon we will find that while cash-rich banks can handle the outflows,<b>some bond-heavy banks cannot.</b>As a result, Zoltan predicts that next \"we will notice that some banks (those who can<i><b>not</b></i>handle outflows) are borrowing advances from FHLBs, and cash-rich banks stop lending in the FX swap market as the RRP facility pulled reserves away from them and the Fed has to re-start the FX swap lines to offset.\"</p><p><blockquote>这就是为什么这个问题与2019年的回购危机类似：很快我们就会发现，虽然现金充裕的银行可以应对资金外流，<b>一些债券密集型银行则不能。</b>因此，Zoltan预测，接下来“我们将注意到一些银行（那些能够<i><b>不</b></i>处理资金外流）正在从FHLB借入预付款，现金充裕的银行停止在外汇掉期市场放贷，因为RRP工具从它们那里抽走了准备金，美联储不得不重新启动外汇掉期额度来抵消。”</blockquote></p><p> Bottom line:<i><b>whereas previously we saw Libor-OIS collapse, this key funding spread will have to widen from here, unless the Fed lowers the o/n RRP rate again back to where it was before.</b></i></p><p><blockquote>底线：<i><b>尽管之前我们看到Libor-OIS崩溃，但这一关键资金利差将不得不从这里扩大，除非美联储再次将o/n RRP利率降低到以前的水平。</b></i></blockquote></p><p> Or, as Zoltan summarizes, \"It’s either quantities or prices\" - indeed,<b>in 2019 the Fed chose prices over quantities, which backfired, and led to the repo crisis which ended the Fed's hiking cycle and started \"NOT QE.\"</b>While the Fed redeemed itself in February, when it expanded the usage of the RRP without making it liability-constrained as it chose quantities over prices - which worked well - last Wednesday,<b>the Fed turned “unlimited” quantities into “money for free” and started to sterilize reserves.</b></p><p><blockquote>或者，正如Zoltan总结的那样，“要么是数量，要么是价格”——事实上，<b>2019年，美联储选择了价格而不是数量，这适得其反，并导致了回购危机，结束了美联储的加息周期，并开始了“非量化宽松”。</b>虽然美联储在2月份进行了自我救赎，但上周三，它在没有使其负债受到限制的情况下扩大了建议零售价的使用范围，因为它选择了数量而不是价格——这一点效果很好——<b>美联储将“无限”的数量变成了“免费的钱”，并开始冲销储备。</b></blockquote></p><p> Bottom line: \"we are witnessing the dealer of last resort (DoLR) learning the art of dealing, making unforced errors – if the Fed sterilizes with an overpriced o/n RRP facility, it has to be ready to add liquidity via the swap lines…\"</p><p><blockquote>底线：“我们正在目睹最后手段交易商（DoLR）学习交易艺术，犯非受迫性错误——如果美联储通过定价过高的o/n RRP工具进行冲销，它必须准备好通过掉期增加流动性线……”</blockquote></p><p> Translation:&nbsp;<b>by paying trillions in reserves 5bps, the Fed just planted the seeds of the next liquidity crisis.</b></p><p><blockquote>翻译：<b>通过支付数万亿美元的准备金5个基点，美联储刚刚播下了下一场流动性危机的种子。</b></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis<blockquote>鲍威尔刚刚发射了2万亿美元的“热寻导弹”：Zoltan解释美联储如何开启下一次回购危机</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPowell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis<blockquote>鲍威尔刚刚发射了2万亿美元的“热寻导弹”：Zoltan解释美联储如何开启下一次回购危机</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-21 15:13</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpected hawkish pivot, we noted that there were two tangible, if less noted changes: the Fed adjusted the two key \"administered\" rates, raising both the IOER and RRP rates by 5 basis points (as correctly predicted by Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wrightson, Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo while Citi, Oxford Economics, Jefferies, Credit Suisse, Standard Chartered, BMO were wrong in predicting no rate change), in an effort to push the Effective Fed Funds rate higher and away from its imminent rendezvous with 0%.</p><p><blockquote>上周，在市场对美联储意外鹰派转向的震惊反应中，我们注意到有两个切实但不太引人注目的变化：美联储调整了两个关键的“管理”利率，将IOER和RRP利率都提高了5个基点（正如美国银行、摩根大通、莱特森、德意志银行和富国银行正确预测的那样，而花旗、牛津经济研究院、杰富瑞、瑞士信贷、渣打银行、蒙特利尔银行错误地预测利率不会变化），以推动有效联邦基金利率走高，远离即将到来的0%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31e3c93e7ae558cd9f2fdb7e4a2769f1\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"377\">What does this mean? As Curvature Securities repo guru,Scott Skyrm wrote last week, \"clearly the Fed intends to move overnight rates above zero and drain the RRP&nbsp; facility of cash.\" Unfortunately, the end result would be precisely the opposite of what the Fed had wanted to achieve.</p><p><blockquote>这是什么意思？正如Curvature Securities回购专家Scott Skyrm上周写道，“显然，美联储打算将隔夜利率提高到零以上，并耗尽RRP工具的现金。”不幸的是，最终结果将与美联储想要达到的目标完全相反。</blockquote></p><p> But what does this really mean for overnight rates and RRP volume? As Skyrm further noted, the increase in the IOER should pull the daily fed funds rate 5 basis points higher and, in turn, put upward pressure on Repo GC. Combined with the 5 basis point increase in RRP, GC should move a solid 5 basis points higher, which it has.</p><p><blockquote>但这对于隔夜利率和建议零售价交易量到底意味着什么？正如Skyrm进一步指出的那样，IOER的上升应该会将每日联邦基金利率拉高5个基点，进而给回购GC带来上行压力。结合RRP增加5个基点，GC应该会大幅上涨5个基点，事实也确实如此。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8b99df7af1731b4bdcbcf072dcf39ce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"272\">The problem, as Skyrm warned, is that the Fed's technical adjustment would do nothing to ease the RRP volume:</p><p><blockquote>正如Skyrm警告的那样，问题在于美联储的技术调整无助于缓解建议零售额：</blockquote></p><p>   When market Repo rates were at 0% and the RRP rate was at zero, ~$500 billion went into the RRP. Well, if both market Repo rates and the RRP rate are 5 basis points higher, there's no reason to pull cash out of the RRP. For example, if GC rates moved to .05% and the RRP rate stayed at zero, investor preferences to invest at a higher rate would remove cash from the RRP.  Bottom line: with both market rates and RRP at .05%, there's really no economic incentive for cash investors to move cash to the Repo market. Or, as we summarized, \"<i>the Fed's rate change may have zero impact on the Fed's reverse repo facility, or the record half a trillion in cash parked there.\"</i></p><p><blockquote>当市场回购利率为0%且RRP利率为零时，约5000亿美元进入RRP。好吧，如果市场回购利率和RRP利率都高出5个基点，就没有理由从RRP中提取现金。例如，如果GC利率升至0.05%，而RRP利率保持在零，投资者以更高利率投资的偏好将从RRP中移除现金。底线：由于市场利率和建议零售价均为0.05%，现金投资者确实没有经济动机将现金转移到回购市场。或者，正如我们总结的那样，“<i>美联储的利率变化可能对美联储的逆回购工具或创纪录的5000亿现金产生零影响。”</i></blockquote></p><p> In retrospect, boy was that an understatement, because just one day later the already record usage of the Fed's Reverse Repo facility spiked by a record 50%, exploding to a staggering $756 billion (it closed Friday at $747 billion) as the GSEs.</p><p><blockquote>回想起来，这是一种轻描淡写的说法，因为仅仅一天后，美联储逆回购工具的使用量就飙升了创纪录的50%，随着GSE的出现，飙升至惊人的7560亿美元（周五收盘价为7470亿美元）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fba18d7808300abc3bdf4ffaa3d5fb6\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"273\">Needless to say, flooding the Fed's RRP facility and sterilizing reserves is hardly what the Fed had intended, and as Credit Suisse's own repo guru (and former NY Fed staffer) Zoltan Pozsar wrote in his post-mortem, \"<b>the re-priced RRP facility will become a problem for the banking system fast:</b><b><u>the banking system is going from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market</u></b><b>).\"</b></p><p><blockquote>不用说，淹没美联储的建议零售价工具和冲销准备金几乎不是美联储的本意，正如瑞士信贷自己的回购专家（前纽约联储工作人员）Zoltan Pozsar在他的事后分析中所写的那样，“<b>重新定价的建议零售价融资将很快成为银行系统的一个问题：</b><b><u>银行体系正在从资产约束（存款大量涌入，但除了美联储之外无处可贷）转变为负债约束（存款不断流失，除了货币市场之外无处可替代）</u></b><b>).\"</b></blockquote></p><p> What he means by that is that whereas previously the RRP rate of 0.00% did not<i>reward</i>allocation of inert, excess reserves but merely provided a place to park them, now that the Fed is providing a generous yield pick up compared to rates offered by trillions in Bills, we are about to see a sea-change in the overnight, money-market, as trillions in capital reallocate away from traditional investments and into the the Fed's RRP.</p><p><blockquote>他的意思是，以前0.00%的RRP利率没有<i>奖励</i>分配惰性的超额准备金，但只是提供了一个存放它们的地方，现在美联储提供的收益率与数万亿票据提供的利率相比大幅上升，我们即将看到隔夜货币市场发生翻天覆地的变化，数万亿资本从传统投资重新分配到美联储的建议零售价。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, as Pozsar puts it, \"the RRP facility started to sterilize reserves... with more to come.\" And just as Deutsche Bank explained why the Fed's signaling was an r* policy error, to Pozsar, the Fed<i><b>also</b></i>made a policy error - only this time with its technical rates - by steriling reserves because \"it’s one thing to raise the rate on the RRP facility when an increase was not strictly speaking necessary, and it’s another to raise it “unduly” high – as one money fund manager put it, “<b>yesterday we could not even get a basis points a year; to get endless paper at five basis points from the most trusted counterparty is a dream come true.\"</b></p><p><blockquote>换句话说，正如Pozsar所说，“RRP设施开始对储备进行消毒……还会有更多储备。”而就在德意志银行向Pozsar解释为什么美联储的信号是一个r*政策错误时，美联储<i><b>也</b></i>犯了一个政策错误——只是这次是技术利率——冲销准备金，因为“当严格来说没有必要提高RRP设施的利率时，提高RRP设施的利率是一回事，而将其提高到‘过高’是另一回事——正如一位货币基金经理所说，”<b>昨天，我们一年甚至拿不到一个基点；以五个基点从最值得信赖的交易对手那里获得无尽的票据是梦想成真。”</b></blockquote></p><p> He's right: while 0bps may have been viewed by many as too low, it was hardly catastrophic for now (Credit Suisse was one of those predicting no administered rate hike),<b>5bps is too generous</b>, according to Pozsar who warns that the new reverse repo rate<b>will upset the state of \"singularity\"</b>and \"like heat-seeking missiles, money market investors move hundreds of billions, making sharp, 90º turns hunting for even a basis point of yield at the zero bound –<b>at 5 bps, money funds have an incentive to trade out of all their Treasury bills and park cash at the RRP facility.\"</b></p><p><blockquote>他是对的：虽然许多人可能认为0个基点太低，但目前这很难说是灾难性的（瑞士信贷是预测不会有管理加息的机构之一），<b>5bps太慷慨了</b>Pozsar警告说，新的逆回购利率<b>将颠覆“奇点”状态</b>“就像热寻的导弹一样，货币市场投资者转移了数千亿美元，急转弯90度，在零边界寻找哪怕一个基点的收益率——<b>在5个基点的利率下，货币基金有动力出售所有国库券并将现金存放在RRP设施中。”</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Indeed, as shown below, bills yield less than 5 bps out to 6 months,<b>and money funds have over $2 trillion of bills.</b>They got an the incentive to sell, while others have the incentive to buy: institutions whose deposits have been “tolerated” by banks until now earning zero interest have an incentive to harvest the 0-5 bps range the bill curve has to offer. Putting your cash at a basis point in bills is better than deposits at zero.<b>So the sterilization of reserves begins, and so the o/n RRP facility turns from a largely passive tool that provided an interest rate floor to the deposits that large banks have been pushing away, into an active tool that \"sucks\" the deposits away that banks decided to retain.</b></p><p><blockquote>事实上，如下图所示，6个月的票据收益率不到5个基点，<b>货币基金拥有超过2万亿美元的票据。</b>他们有卖出的动机，而其他人有买入的动机：那些存款一直被银行“容忍”到目前为止赚取零利息的机构有动力获得票据曲线提供的0-5个基点的范围。将现金以一个基点存入票据比零存款要好。<b>因此，准备金冲销开始了，因此o/n RRP工具从一个为大型银行一直在推走的存款提供利率下限的基本上被动的工具，变成了一个“吸走”银行决定保留的存款的主动工具。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf593f7b1d2d665f39384ed6a998d3bf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"403\">To help readers visualize what is going on, the Credit Suisse strategist suggest the following \"extreme\" thought experiment: most of the “Covid-19” deposits currently with banks go into the bill market where rates are better. Money funds sell bills to institutional investors that currently keep their cash at banks, and money funds swap bills for o/n RRPs. Said (somewhat) simply, while previously the Fed provided banks with a convenient place to park reserves, it now will actively drain reserves to the point where we may end up with another 2019-style repo crisis, as most financial institutions suddenly find themsleves with<i><b>too few</b></i>intraday reserves, forcing them to use the Fed's other funding facilities (such as FX swap lines) to remain consistently solvent.</p><p><blockquote>为了帮助读者直观地了解正在发生的事情，瑞士信贷策略师建议进行以下“极端”的思想实验：目前银行的大部分“Covid-19”存款都进入了利率更好的票据市场。货币基金向目前将现金存放在银行的机构投资者出售票据，货币基金将票据交换为o/N RRP。（有点）简单地说，虽然美联储以前为银行提供了一个方便的存放准备金的地方，但现在它将积极耗尽准备金，以至于我们可能最终会陷入另一场2019年式的回购危机，因为大多数金融机构突然发现自己与<i><b>太少</b></i>日内储备，迫使它们使用美联储的其他融资工具（如外汇掉期额度）来保持持续的偿付能力。</blockquote></p><p> This process is not overnight. It will take a few weeks to observe the fallout from the Fed's reserve sterilization.</p><p><blockquote>这个过程不是一蹴而就的。需要几周时间才能观察到美联储准备金冲销的影响。</blockquote></p><p> And here is why the problem is similar to the repo crisis of 2019: soon we will find that while cash-rich banks can handle the outflows,<b>some bond-heavy banks cannot.</b>As a result, Zoltan predicts that next \"we will notice that some banks (those who can<i><b>not</b></i>handle outflows) are borrowing advances from FHLBs, and cash-rich banks stop lending in the FX swap market as the RRP facility pulled reserves away from them and the Fed has to re-start the FX swap lines to offset.\"</p><p><blockquote>这就是为什么这个问题与2019年的回购危机类似：很快我们就会发现，虽然现金充裕的银行可以应对资金外流，<b>一些债券密集型银行则不能。</b>因此，Zoltan预测，接下来“我们将注意到一些银行（那些能够<i><b>不</b></i>处理资金外流）正在从FHLB借入预付款，现金充裕的银行停止在外汇掉期市场放贷，因为RRP工具从它们那里抽走了准备金，美联储不得不重新启动外汇掉期额度来抵消。”</blockquote></p><p> Bottom line:<i><b>whereas previously we saw Libor-OIS collapse, this key funding spread will have to widen from here, unless the Fed lowers the o/n RRP rate again back to where it was before.</b></i></p><p><blockquote>底线：<i><b>尽管之前我们看到Libor-OIS崩溃，但这一关键资金利差将不得不从这里扩大，除非美联储再次将o/n RRP利率降低到以前的水平。</b></i></blockquote></p><p> Or, as Zoltan summarizes, \"It’s either quantities or prices\" - indeed,<b>in 2019 the Fed chose prices over quantities, which backfired, and led to the repo crisis which ended the Fed's hiking cycle and started \"NOT QE.\"</b>While the Fed redeemed itself in February, when it expanded the usage of the RRP without making it liability-constrained as it chose quantities over prices - which worked well - last Wednesday,<b>the Fed turned “unlimited” quantities into “money for free” and started to sterilize reserves.</b></p><p><blockquote>或者，正如Zoltan总结的那样，“要么是数量，要么是价格”——事实上，<b>2019年，美联储选择了价格而不是数量，这适得其反，并导致了回购危机，结束了美联储的加息周期，并开始了“非量化宽松”。</b>虽然美联储在2月份进行了自我救赎，但上周三，它在没有使其负债受到限制的情况下扩大了建议零售价的使用范围，因为它选择了数量而不是价格——这一点效果很好——<b>美联储将“无限”的数量变成了“免费的钱”，并开始冲销储备。</b></blockquote></p><p> Bottom line: \"we are witnessing the dealer of last resort (DoLR) learning the art of dealing, making unforced errors – if the Fed sterilizes with an overpriced o/n RRP facility, it has to be ready to add liquidity via the swap lines…\"</p><p><blockquote>底线：“我们正在目睹最后手段交易商（DoLR）学习交易艺术，犯非受迫性错误——如果美联储通过定价过高的o/n RRP工具进行冲销，它必须准备好通过掉期增加流动性线……”</blockquote></p><p> Translation:&nbsp;<b>by paying trillions in reserves 5bps, the Fed just planted the seeds of the next liquidity crisis.</b></p><p><blockquote>翻译：<b>通过支付数万亿美元的准备金5个基点，美联储刚刚播下了下一场流动性危机的种子。</b></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/powell-just-launched-2-trillion-heat-seeking-missiles-zoltan-explains-how-fed-started-next\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/powell-just-launched-2-trillion-heat-seeking-missiles-zoltan-explains-how-fed-started-next","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146982088","content_text":"Last week, amid thefire and brimstone surroundingthe market's shocked response to the Fed's unexpected hawkish pivot, we noted that there were two tangible, if less noted changes: the Fed adjusted the two key \"administered\" rates, raising both the IOER and RRP rates by 5 basis points (as correctly predicted by Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wrightson, Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo while Citi, Oxford Economics, Jefferies, Credit Suisse, Standard Chartered, BMO were wrong in predicting no rate change), in an effort to push the Effective Fed Funds rate higher and away from its imminent rendezvous with 0%.\nWhat does this mean? As Curvature Securities repo guru,Scott Skyrm wrote last week, \"clearly the Fed intends to move overnight rates above zero and drain the RRP  facility of cash.\" Unfortunately, the end result would be precisely the opposite of what the Fed had wanted to achieve.\nBut what does this really mean for overnight rates and RRP volume? As Skyrm further noted, the increase in the IOER should pull the daily fed funds rate 5 basis points higher and, in turn, put upward pressure on Repo GC. Combined with the 5 basis point increase in RRP, GC should move a solid 5 basis points higher, which it has.\nThe problem, as Skyrm warned, is that the Fed's technical adjustment would do nothing to ease the RRP volume:\n\n When market Repo rates were at 0% and the RRP rate was at zero, ~$500 billion went into the RRP. Well, if both market Repo rates and the RRP rate are 5 basis points higher, there's no reason to pull cash out of the RRP. For example, if GC rates moved to .05% and the RRP rate stayed at zero, investor preferences to invest at a higher rate would remove cash from the RRP.\n\nBottom line: with both market rates and RRP at .05%, there's really no economic incentive for cash investors to move cash to the Repo market. Or, as we summarized, \"the Fed's rate change may have zero impact on the Fed's reverse repo facility, or the record half a trillion in cash parked there.\"\nIn retrospect, boy was that an understatement, because just one day later the already record usage of the Fed's Reverse Repo facility spiked by a record 50%, exploding to a staggering $756 billion (it closed Friday at $747 billion) as the GSEs.\nNeedless to say, flooding the Fed's RRP facility and sterilizing reserves is hardly what the Fed had intended, and as Credit Suisse's own repo guru (and former NY Fed staffer) Zoltan Pozsar wrote in his post-mortem, \"the re-priced RRP facility will become a problem for the banking system fast:the banking system is going from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market).\"\nWhat he means by that is that whereas previously the RRP rate of 0.00% did notrewardallocation of inert, excess reserves but merely provided a place to park them, now that the Fed is providing a generous yield pick up compared to rates offered by trillions in Bills, we are about to see a sea-change in the overnight, money-market, as trillions in capital reallocate away from traditional investments and into the the Fed's RRP.\nIn other words, as Pozsar puts it, \"the RRP facility started to sterilize reserves... with more to come.\" And just as Deutsche Bank explained why the Fed's signaling was an r* policy error, to Pozsar, the Fedalsomade a policy error - only this time with its technical rates - by steriling reserves because \"it’s one thing to raise the rate on the RRP facility when an increase was not strictly speaking necessary, and it’s another to raise it “unduly” high – as one money fund manager put it, “yesterday we could not even get a basis points a year; to get endless paper at five basis points from the most trusted counterparty is a dream come true.\"\nHe's right: while 0bps may have been viewed by many as too low, it was hardly catastrophic for now (Credit Suisse was one of those predicting no administered rate hike),5bps is too generous, according to Pozsar who warns that the new reverse repo ratewill upset the state of \"singularity\"and \"like heat-seeking missiles, money market investors move hundreds of billions, making sharp, 90º turns hunting for even a basis point of yield at the zero bound –at 5 bps, money funds have an incentive to trade out of all their Treasury bills and park cash at the RRP facility.\"\nIndeed, as shown below, bills yield less than 5 bps out to 6 months,and money funds have over $2 trillion of bills.They got an the incentive to sell, while others have the incentive to buy: institutions whose deposits have been “tolerated” by banks until now earning zero interest have an incentive to harvest the 0-5 bps range the bill curve has to offer. Putting your cash at a basis point in bills is better than deposits at zero.So the sterilization of reserves begins, and so the o/n RRP facility turns from a largely passive tool that provided an interest rate floor to the deposits that large banks have been pushing away, into an active tool that \"sucks\" the deposits away that banks decided to retain.\nTo help readers visualize what is going on, the Credit Suisse strategist suggest the following \"extreme\" thought experiment: most of the “Covid-19” deposits currently with banks go into the bill market where rates are better. Money funds sell bills to institutional investors that currently keep their cash at banks, and money funds swap bills for o/n RRPs. Said (somewhat) simply, while previously the Fed provided banks with a convenient place to park reserves, it now will actively drain reserves to the point where we may end up with another 2019-style repo crisis, as most financial institutions suddenly find themsleves withtoo fewintraday reserves, forcing them to use the Fed's other funding facilities (such as FX swap lines) to remain consistently solvent.\nThis process is not overnight. It will take a few weeks to observe the fallout from the Fed's reserve sterilization.\nAnd here is why the problem is similar to the repo crisis of 2019: soon we will find that while cash-rich banks can handle the outflows,some bond-heavy banks cannot.As a result, Zoltan predicts that next \"we will notice that some banks (those who cannothandle outflows) are borrowing advances from FHLBs, and cash-rich banks stop lending in the FX swap market as the RRP facility pulled reserves away from them and the Fed has to re-start the FX swap lines to offset.\"\nBottom line:whereas previously we saw Libor-OIS collapse, this key funding spread will have to widen from here, unless the Fed lowers the o/n RRP rate again back to where it was before.\nOr, as Zoltan summarizes, \"It’s either quantities or prices\" - indeed,in 2019 the Fed chose prices over quantities, which backfired, and led to the repo crisis which ended the Fed's hiking cycle and started \"NOT QE.\"While the Fed redeemed itself in February, when it expanded the usage of the RRP without making it liability-constrained as it chose quantities over prices - which worked well - last Wednesday,the Fed turned “unlimited” quantities into “money for free” and started to sterilize reserves.\nBottom line: \"we are witnessing the dealer of last resort (DoLR) learning the art of dealing, making unforced errors – if the Fed sterilizes with an overpriced o/n RRP facility, it has to be ready to add liquidity via the swap lines…\"\nTranslation: by paying trillions in reserves 5bps, the Fed just planted the seeds of the next liquidity crisis.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":942,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}