Jltan81的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Jltan81

Jltan81

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

10关注

2粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-06-11

[Happy] [Happy]

China's Didi reveals U.S. IPO filing, sets stage for blockbuster New York float<blockquote>中国滴滴公布美国 IPO 文件，为纽约重磅上市奠定基础</blockquote>

2021-07-05

[Cry]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-03

[Smile] [Smile]

AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并未气馁，反复抨击评级</blockquote>

2021-07-06

Like and comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-27

Nio[Smile]

Ford Or NIO? The Final Verdict<blockquote>福特还是蔚来？最终判决</blockquote>

2021-06-08

[Smile]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-07

[Smile]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-14

[Smile]

Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate<blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 $1.03 超出预期 $0.77，销售额 $21.50B，低于预期 $21.83B</blockquote>

2021-06-25

[Miser]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-21

[Smile] [Smile]

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3581714557515258","uuid":"3581714557515258","gmtCreate":1618621446031,"gmtModify":1619238485532,"name":"Jltan81","pinyin":"jltan81","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":10,"tweetSize":41,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":"93.10%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.09.04","exceedPercentage":"93.77%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":176685174,"gmtCreate":1626880219698,"gmtModify":1631891823573,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176685174","repostId":"1148130964","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2405,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173749103,"gmtCreate":1626690418202,"gmtModify":1631891823585,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173749103","repostId":"1111084715","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2500,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170242879,"gmtCreate":1626439210091,"gmtModify":1631891823599,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170242879","repostId":"1175286653","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175286653","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626437220,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1175286653?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 20:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Friday<blockquote>周五美国市场开盘前的顶线</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175286653","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock index futures edged higher on Friday, with investors piling on economically sensitive ene","content":"<p>U.S. stock index futures edged higher on Friday, with investors piling on economically sensitive energy, banks and travel stocks ahead of key retail sales data that would shed light on the strength of the economic recovery.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周五小幅走高，投资者在关键零售销售数据公布之前大量买入对经济敏感的能源、银行和旅游股票，这些数据将揭示经济复苏的力度。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:05 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were up 35 points, or 0.10%, S&amp;P 500 E-minis were up 6 points, or 0.14% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 25.5 points, or 0.17%.</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间上午 8:05，道琼斯电子迷你指数上涨 35 点，涨幅 0.10%，标普500电子迷你指数上涨 6 点，涨幅 0.14%，纳斯达克 100 电子迷你指数上涨 25.5 点，涨幅 0.17%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d8c94dfebffda72664343c6eec4cbdd\" tg-width=\"983\" tg-height=\"345\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 08:05</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>*资料来源：Tiger Trade，美国东部时间 08:05</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The Commerce Department’s report, due at 8:30 a.m. ET, is expected to show U.S. retail sales rose marginally in June after dropping 1.3% in May.</p><p><blockquote>美国商务部将于美国东部时间上午 8:30 发布的报告预计将显示，美国零售额在 5 月份下降 1.3% 后，6 月份将小幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> Markets have largely cheered a steady recovery in the labor market this year, but concerns about higher inflation due to a faster-than-expected rebound has hurt sentiment, with investors oscillating between “value” and tech-heavy “growth” names in the past few sessions.</p><p><blockquote>市场在很大程度上为今年劳动力市场的稳步复苏欢欣鼓舞，但对因反弹速度快于预期而导致通胀上升的担忧打击了市场情绪，投资者在过去几个交易日中在 “价值 ”和科技股密集的 “增长 ”名称之间摇摆不定。</blockquote></p><p> Rate-sensitive lenders Citigroup Inc, JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co, Goldman Sachs Group Inc, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Corp rose between 0.2% and 0.3%, tracking a rise in benchmark 10-year Treasury yield.</p><p><blockquote>对利率敏感的银行花旗集团、摩根大通、高盛集团、摩根士丹利和美国银行股价上涨 0.2% 至 0.3%，跟踪基准 10 年期国债收益率的上升。</blockquote></p><p> Oil stocks Chevron Corp, Diamondback Energy Inc, Exxon Mobil Corp, Halliburton Co, Schlumberger NV and Occidental Petroleum Corp gained between 0.7% and 0.9%.</p><p><blockquote>石油股雪佛龙公司、响尾蛇能源公司、埃克森美孚公司、哈里伯顿公司、斯伦贝谢公司和西方石油公司上涨0.7%至0.9%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRNA\">Moderna, Inc.</a>– The drug maker's shares surged 7.3% in the premarket on news that the stock would be included in the S&amp;P 500 as of July 21st. It will replaceAlexion Pharmaceuticals, which is being acquired byAstraZeneca(AZN).</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRNA\">现代公司。</a>– 该制药商的股价在盘前飙升 7.3%，原因是该股票将于 7 月 21 日被纳入标普500的消息传出。它将取代被比亚斯利康 (AZN) 收购的 Alexion Pharmaceuticals。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">DiDi Global Inc.</a> – Shares of the China-based ride-hailing company slid 5.5% in premarket action after Didi was the subject of an onsite cybersecurity review from officials of at least 7 different government departments.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">滴滴全球公司。</a>– 滴滴受到至少 7 个不同政府部门官员的现场网络安全审查后，这家中国网约车公司的股价在盘前下跌 5.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC Entertainment</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">GameStop</a>– So-called \"meme stocks\" continued their wide swings in the premarket, with AMC up 4.6% and GameStop jumping 3.9%. The movie theater operator's stock rose for just the second time in ten sessions Thursday, while the videogame retailer is riding a five-session losing streak and its stock has been down in nine of the past ten trading days.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC院线</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">游戏驿站</a>– 所谓的“模因股”在盘前继续大幅波动，AMC 上涨 4.6%，游戏驿站上涨 3.9%。这家电影院运营商的股价周四在十个交易日中第二次上涨，而这家视频游戏零售商则连续五个交易日下跌，其股价在过去十个交易日中有九个交易日下跌。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">Carnival</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RCL\">Royal Caribbean Cruises</a> ,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">Norwegian Cruise Line</a> – Cruise stocks rose in the premarket after Canada said it would allow large cruise ships to resume visiting the country in November. Carnival added 1.2%, Royal Caribbean gained 1.1% and Norwegian was up 1.7%.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">狂欢节</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RCL\">皇家加勒比邮轮</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">挪威邮轮公司</a>– 加拿大表示将允许大型游轮于 11 月恢复访问该国后，邮轮股在盘前上涨。嘉年华上涨 1.2%，皇家加勒比上涨 1.1%，挪威上涨 1.7%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a> – Intel is exploring a deal to buy fellow semiconductor maker GlobalFoundries, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke to the Wall Street Journal. Such a transaction could potentially value GlobalFoundries at about $30 billion, although there is no guarantee a deal will be finalized. Intel rose 1% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">英特尔</a>– 据接受《华尔街日报》采访的知情人士透露，英特尔正在探索收购同为半导体制造商的 GlobalFoundries。这样的交易可能会给 GlobalFoundries 带来约 300 亿美元的价值，尽管不能保证交易一定会完成。英特尔在盘前交易中上涨 1%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> – Shares of the live-sports video streaming company surged 4.7% in the premarket after its Fubo Gaming subsidiary struck a market access agreement with casino operator Cordish Companies for its planned mobile Fubo Sportsbook in Pennsylvania.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">富博电视公司。</a>– 这家直播体育视频流公司的股价在盘前飙升 4.7%，此前其 Fubo Gaming 子公司与赌场运营商 Cordish Companies 就其计划在宾夕法尼亚州推出的移动 Fubo Sportsbook 达成了市场准入协议。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP\">Molson Coors</a> – The beer brewer announced it would resume paying quarterly dividends, with a planned payout of 34 cents per share payable on September 17 to shareholders of record as of August 30. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP.A\">Molson Coors</a> had suspended its dividend last May as it dealt with the financial impact of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP\">莫尔森·库尔斯</a>– 这家啤酒酿造商宣布将恢复支付季度股息，计划于 9 月 17 日向截至 8 月 30 日登记在册的股东支付每股 34 美分。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP.A\">莫尔森·库尔斯</a>去年五月，为了应对疫情的财务影响，该公司暂停了股息。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIDE\">Lordstown Motors Corp.</a> – The electric truck maker said it is under investigation by federal prosecutors in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>, who are looking into Lordstown's vehicle pre-orders as well as its merger with special purpose acquisition company DiamondPeak Holdings last October. Lordstown lost 1% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIDE\">洛兹敦汽车公司。</a>– 这家电动卡车制造商表示，联邦检察官正在对其进行调查。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">纽约</a>他们正在调查 Lordstown 的汽车预购以及去年 10 月与特殊目的收购公司 DiamondPeak Holdings 的合并。洛兹敦在盘前交易中下跌 1%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TXT\">Textron</a>– The stock was added to the \"Conviction Buy\" list at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>, which points to a strengthening market for business jets and consensus estimates that it feels are too low.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TXT\">德事隆</a>– 该股于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">高盛</a>这表明公务机市场正在走强，但普遍预期过低。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HNST\">The Honest Company, Inc.</a> – Shares of Honest Company rose 2.4% in the premarket after the maker of personal care products was upgraded to \"buy\" from \"hold\" at Loop Capital Markets. Loop said shares are now at an attractive level after a recent pullback.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HNST\">诚实公司。</a>– 在 Loop Capital Markets 将个人护理产品制造商 Honest Company 的评级从“持有”上调至“买入”后，其股价在盘前上涨 2.4%。Loop 表示，经过最近的回调，股价目前处于有吸引力的水平。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYV\">Live Nation Entertainment</a> – The live entertainment producer was rated \"buy\" in new coverage at Goldman Sachs, which said Live Nation is poised to benefit from an expected surge in concert activity. Live Nation added 2.6% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYV\">Live Nation娱乐</a>– 在高盛的新报道中，这位现场娱乐制作人被评为“买入”，高盛表示，Live Nation 有望从音乐会活动的预期激增中受益。Live Nation 在盘前交易中上涨 2.6%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Friday<blockquote>周五美国市场开盘前的顶线</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Friday<blockquote>周五美国市场开盘前的顶线</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-16 20:07</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. stock index futures edged higher on Friday, with investors piling on economically sensitive energy, banks and travel stocks ahead of key retail sales data that would shed light on the strength of the economic recovery.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周五小幅走高，投资者在关键零售销售数据公布之前大量买入对经济敏感的能源、银行和旅游股票，这些数据将揭示经济复苏的力度。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:05 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were up 35 points, or 0.10%, S&amp;P 500 E-minis were up 6 points, or 0.14% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 25.5 points, or 0.17%.</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间上午 8:05，道琼斯电子迷你指数上涨 35 点，涨幅 0.10%，标普500电子迷你指数上涨 6 点，涨幅 0.14%，纳斯达克 100 电子迷你指数上涨 25.5 点，涨幅 0.17%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d8c94dfebffda72664343c6eec4cbdd\" tg-width=\"983\" tg-height=\"345\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 08:05</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>*资料来源：Tiger Trade，美国东部时间 08:05</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The Commerce Department’s report, due at 8:30 a.m. ET, is expected to show U.S. retail sales rose marginally in June after dropping 1.3% in May.</p><p><blockquote>美国商务部将于美国东部时间上午 8:30 发布的报告预计将显示，美国零售额在 5 月份下降 1.3% 后，6 月份将小幅增长。</blockquote></p><p> Markets have largely cheered a steady recovery in the labor market this year, but concerns about higher inflation due to a faster-than-expected rebound has hurt sentiment, with investors oscillating between “value” and tech-heavy “growth” names in the past few sessions.</p><p><blockquote>市场在很大程度上为今年劳动力市场的稳步复苏欢欣鼓舞，但对因反弹速度快于预期而导致通胀上升的担忧打击了市场情绪，投资者在过去几个交易日中在 “价值 ”和科技股密集的 “增长 ”名称之间摇摆不定。</blockquote></p><p> Rate-sensitive lenders Citigroup Inc, JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co, Goldman Sachs Group Inc, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Corp rose between 0.2% and 0.3%, tracking a rise in benchmark 10-year Treasury yield.</p><p><blockquote>对利率敏感的银行花旗集团、摩根大通、高盛集团、摩根士丹利和美国银行股价上涨 0.2% 至 0.3%，跟踪基准 10 年期国债收益率的上升。</blockquote></p><p> Oil stocks Chevron Corp, Diamondback Energy Inc, Exxon Mobil Corp, Halliburton Co, Schlumberger NV and Occidental Petroleum Corp gained between 0.7% and 0.9%.</p><p><blockquote>石油股雪佛龙公司、响尾蛇能源公司、埃克森美孚公司、哈里伯顿公司、斯伦贝谢公司和西方石油公司上涨0.7%至0.9%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRNA\">Moderna, Inc.</a>– The drug maker's shares surged 7.3% in the premarket on news that the stock would be included in the S&amp;P 500 as of July 21st. It will replaceAlexion Pharmaceuticals, which is being acquired byAstraZeneca(AZN).</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRNA\">现代公司。</a>– 该制药商的股价在盘前飙升 7.3%，原因是该股票将于 7 月 21 日被纳入标普500的消息传出。它将取代被比亚斯利康 (AZN) 收购的 Alexion Pharmaceuticals。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">DiDi Global Inc.</a> – Shares of the China-based ride-hailing company slid 5.5% in premarket action after Didi was the subject of an onsite cybersecurity review from officials of at least 7 different government departments.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">滴滴全球公司。</a>– 滴滴受到至少 7 个不同政府部门官员的现场网络安全审查后，这家中国网约车公司的股价在盘前下跌 5.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC Entertainment</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">GameStop</a>– So-called \"meme stocks\" continued their wide swings in the premarket, with AMC up 4.6% and GameStop jumping 3.9%. The movie theater operator's stock rose for just the second time in ten sessions Thursday, while the videogame retailer is riding a five-session losing streak and its stock has been down in nine of the past ten trading days.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC院线</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">游戏驿站</a>– 所谓的“模因股”在盘前继续大幅波动，AMC 上涨 4.6%，游戏驿站上涨 3.9%。这家电影院运营商的股价周四在十个交易日中第二次上涨，而这家视频游戏零售商则连续五个交易日下跌，其股价在过去十个交易日中有九个交易日下跌。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">Carnival</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RCL\">Royal Caribbean Cruises</a> ,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">Norwegian Cruise Line</a> – Cruise stocks rose in the premarket after Canada said it would allow large cruise ships to resume visiting the country in November. Carnival added 1.2%, Royal Caribbean gained 1.1% and Norwegian was up 1.7%.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">狂欢节</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RCL\">皇家加勒比邮轮</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">挪威邮轮公司</a>– 加拿大表示将允许大型游轮于 11 月恢复访问该国后，邮轮股在盘前上涨。嘉年华上涨 1.2%，皇家加勒比上涨 1.1%，挪威上涨 1.7%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a> – Intel is exploring a deal to buy fellow semiconductor maker GlobalFoundries, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke to the Wall Street Journal. Such a transaction could potentially value GlobalFoundries at about $30 billion, although there is no guarantee a deal will be finalized. Intel rose 1% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">英特尔</a>– 据接受《华尔街日报》采访的知情人士透露，英特尔正在探索收购同为半导体制造商的 GlobalFoundries。这样的交易可能会给 GlobalFoundries 带来约 300 亿美元的价值，尽管不能保证交易一定会完成。英特尔在盘前交易中上涨 1%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> – Shares of the live-sports video streaming company surged 4.7% in the premarket after its Fubo Gaming subsidiary struck a market access agreement with casino operator Cordish Companies for its planned mobile Fubo Sportsbook in Pennsylvania.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">富博电视公司。</a>– 这家直播体育视频流公司的股价在盘前飙升 4.7%，此前其 Fubo Gaming 子公司与赌场运营商 Cordish Companies 就其计划在宾夕法尼亚州推出的移动 Fubo Sportsbook 达成了市场准入协议。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP\">Molson Coors</a> – The beer brewer announced it would resume paying quarterly dividends, with a planned payout of 34 cents per share payable on September 17 to shareholders of record as of August 30. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP.A\">Molson Coors</a> had suspended its dividend last May as it dealt with the financial impact of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP\">莫尔森·库尔斯</a>– 这家啤酒酿造商宣布将恢复支付季度股息，计划于 9 月 17 日向截至 8 月 30 日登记在册的股东支付每股 34 美分。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAP.A\">莫尔森·库尔斯</a>去年五月，为了应对疫情的财务影响，该公司暂停了股息。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIDE\">Lordstown Motors Corp.</a> – The electric truck maker said it is under investigation by federal prosecutors in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>, who are looking into Lordstown's vehicle pre-orders as well as its merger with special purpose acquisition company DiamondPeak Holdings last October. Lordstown lost 1% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIDE\">洛兹敦汽车公司。</a>– 这家电动卡车制造商表示，联邦检察官正在对其进行调查。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">纽约</a>他们正在调查 Lordstown 的汽车预购以及去年 10 月与特殊目的收购公司 DiamondPeak Holdings 的合并。洛兹敦在盘前交易中下跌 1%。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TXT\">Textron</a>– The stock was added to the \"Conviction Buy\" list at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>, which points to a strengthening market for business jets and consensus estimates that it feels are too low.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TXT\">德事隆</a>– 该股于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">高盛</a>这表明公务机市场正在走强，但普遍预期过低。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HNST\">The Honest Company, Inc.</a> – Shares of Honest Company rose 2.4% in the premarket after the maker of personal care products was upgraded to \"buy\" from \"hold\" at Loop Capital Markets. Loop said shares are now at an attractive level after a recent pullback.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HNST\">诚实公司。</a>– 在 Loop Capital Markets 将个人护理产品制造商 Honest Company 的评级从“持有”上调至“买入”后，其股价在盘前上涨 2.4%。Loop 表示，经过最近的回调，股价目前处于有吸引力的水平。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYV\">Live Nation Entertainment</a> – The live entertainment producer was rated \"buy\" in new coverage at Goldman Sachs, which said Live Nation is poised to benefit from an expected surge in concert activity. Live Nation added 2.6% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYV\">Live Nation娱乐</a>– 在高盛的新报道中，这位现场娱乐制作人被评为“买入”，高盛表示，Live Nation 有望从音乐会活动的预期激增中受益。Live Nation 在盘前交易中上涨 2.6%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175286653","content_text":"U.S. stock index futures edged higher on Friday, with investors piling on economically sensitive energy, banks and travel stocks ahead of key retail sales data that would shed light on the strength of the economic recovery.\nAt 8:05 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were up 35 points, or 0.10%, S&P 500 E-minis were up 6 points, or 0.14% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 25.5 points, or 0.17%.\n*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 08:05\nThe Commerce Department’s report, due at 8:30 a.m. ET, is expected to show U.S. retail sales rose marginally in June after dropping 1.3% in May.\nMarkets have largely cheered a steady recovery in the labor market this year, but concerns about higher inflation due to a faster-than-expected rebound has hurt sentiment, with investors oscillating between “value” and tech-heavy “growth” names in the past few sessions.\nRate-sensitive lenders Citigroup Inc, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Goldman Sachs Group Inc, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Corp rose between 0.2% and 0.3%, tracking a rise in benchmark 10-year Treasury yield.\nOil stocks Chevron Corp, Diamondback Energy Inc, Exxon Mobil Corp, Halliburton Co, Schlumberger NV and Occidental Petroleum Corp gained between 0.7% and 0.9%.\nStocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:\nModerna, Inc.– The drug maker's shares surged 7.3% in the premarket on news that the stock would be included in the S&P 500 as of July 21st. It will replaceAlexion Pharmaceuticals, which is being acquired byAstraZeneca(AZN).\nDiDi Global Inc. – Shares of the China-based ride-hailing company slid 5.5% in premarket action after Didi was the subject of an onsite cybersecurity review from officials of at least 7 different government departments.\nAMC Entertainment,GameStop– So-called \"meme stocks\" continued their wide swings in the premarket, with AMC up 4.6% and GameStop jumping 3.9%. The movie theater operator's stock rose for just the second time in ten sessions Thursday, while the videogame retailer is riding a five-session losing streak and its stock has been down in nine of the past ten trading days.\nCarnivalRoyal Caribbean Cruises ,Norwegian Cruise Line – Cruise stocks rose in the premarket after Canada said it would allow large cruise ships to resume visiting the country in November. Carnival added 1.2%, Royal Caribbean gained 1.1% and Norwegian was up 1.7%.\nIntel – Intel is exploring a deal to buy fellow semiconductor maker GlobalFoundries, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke to the Wall Street Journal. Such a transaction could potentially value GlobalFoundries at about $30 billion, although there is no guarantee a deal will be finalized. Intel rose 1% in premarket trading.\nfuboTV Inc. – Shares of the live-sports video streaming company surged 4.7% in the premarket after its Fubo Gaming subsidiary struck a market access agreement with casino operator Cordish Companies for its planned mobile Fubo Sportsbook in Pennsylvania.\nMolson Coors – The beer brewer announced it would resume paying quarterly dividends, with a planned payout of 34 cents per share payable on September 17 to shareholders of record as of August 30. Molson Coors had suspended its dividend last May as it dealt with the financial impact of the pandemic.\nLordstown Motors Corp. – The electric truck maker said it is under investigation by federal prosecutors in New York, who are looking into Lordstown's vehicle pre-orders as well as its merger with special purpose acquisition company DiamondPeak Holdings last October. Lordstown lost 1% in premarket trading.\nTextron– The stock was added to the \"Conviction Buy\" list at Goldman Sachs, which points to a strengthening market for business jets and consensus estimates that it feels are too low.\nThe Honest Company, Inc. – Shares of Honest Company rose 2.4% in the premarket after the maker of personal care products was upgraded to \"buy\" from \"hold\" at Loop Capital Markets. Loop said shares are now at an attractive level after a recent pullback.\nLive Nation Entertainment – The live entertainment producer was rated \"buy\" in new coverage at Goldman Sachs, which said Live Nation is poised to benefit from an expected surge in concert activity. Live Nation added 2.6% in premarket trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3575,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147108506,"gmtCreate":1626338758805,"gmtModify":1631891823609,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/147108506","repostId":"1104036057","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104036057","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626335462,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1104036057?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-15 15:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Bank of America’s Profit More Than Doubles, but Revenue Takes a Hit<blockquote>美国银行利润翻了一番多，但收入受到打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104036057","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Like its peers, the bank continued to release money it had set aside for the coronavirus recession.\n","content":"<p>  Like its peers, the bank continued to release money it had set aside for the coronavirus recession.  Bank of AmericaCorp.BAC-2.51%said the economic rebound helped to more than double its profit, but low rates weighed on its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>与同行一样，该银行继续释放为应对冠状病毒衰退预留的资金。美国银行BAC-2.51%表示，经济复苏帮助其利润翻了一番以上，但低利率拖累了其收入。</blockquote></p><p> The nation’s second-largest bank by assets posted earnings Wednesday of $9.22 billion in the second quarter, up from $3.53 billion a year earlier. The bank earned $1.03 a share, beating the 77 cents forecast by analysts polled by FactSet.</p><p><blockquote>这家按资产计算的全美第二大银行周三公布的第二季度盈利为 92.2 亿美元，高于去年同期的 35.3 亿美元。该银行每股收益为 1.03 美元，超过了 FactSet 调查的分析师预测的 77 美分。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America’s bottom line was lifted by its decision to release $2.2 billion of reserves it had set aside during the depths of the coronavirus pandemic to protect against a wave of soured loans. Like peers including JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co., Bank of America has beenreleasing its loan-loss stockpilesas theU.S. economy rebounds.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行决定释放在冠状病毒大流行最严重时期预留的 22 亿美元准备金，以抵御一波不良贷款，这提高了美国银行的底线。与摩根大通等同行一样，美国银行一直在释放其贷款损失股票。经济反弹。</blockquote></p><p> “Consumer spending has significantly surpassed pre-pandemic levels, deposit growth is strong and loan levels have begun to grow,” CEO Brian Moynihan said.</p><p><blockquote>“首席执行官布莱恩-莫伊尼汉（Brian Moynihan）说：”消费者支出已大大超过大流行前的水平，存款增长强劲，贷款水平也开始增长。</blockquote></p><p> Still, revenue in the second quarter was $21.47 billion, down 4% from $22.33 billion a year earlier. That missed analysts’ expectations of $21.8 billion. Bank of America has been the only major U.S. bank so far to miss analysts’ revenue predictions.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，第二季度的收入仍为 214.7 亿美元，比去年同期的 223.3 亿美元下降了 4%。这低于分析师预期的 218 亿美元。美国银行是迄今为止唯一一家未能达到分析师收入预测的美国大型银行。</blockquote></p><p> Investment-banking fees were a bright spot at JPMorgan andGoldman Sachs GroupInc.,which took advantage of companies’ thirst for deal making and posted double-digit gains in their investment-banking revenue. At Bank of America, however, investment-banking fees were down almost 2% to $2.12 billion. Advisory fees for mergers and acquisitions trailed peers.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通（JPMorgan）和高盛集团（Goldman Sachs GroupInc.）的投资银行手续费是一个亮点，它们利用了公司对交易的渴望，投资银行收入实现了两位数的增长。然而，美国银行的投资银行业务费用下降了近 2%，至 21.2 亿美元。并购咨询费落后于同行。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America stock fell 2.5%. Still, bank stocks have outperformed the broader stock market this year as investors buy them to bet on the economic rebound.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行股价下跌 2.5%。尽管如此，银行股今年的表现仍优于大盘，因为投资者买入银行股是为了押注经济复苏。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America and its peers sit at the center of the U.S. economy. They have benefited from the reopening of businesses,record-high stock pricesand people’s increased willingness to spend after a year of hunkering down.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行及其同行处于美国经济的中心。他们受益于企业重新开业、股价创历史新高以及人们在蛰伏一年后消费意愿的增强。</blockquote></p><p> But low rates and tepid loan demand have challenged banks. Bank of America in particular is sensitive to interest rates. Net interest income of $10.23 billion in the second quarter was down 6% from $10.85 billion a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>但低利率和不温不火的贷款需求给银行带来了挑战。美国银行尤其对利率敏感。第二季度净利息收入为102.3亿美元，比去年同期的108.5亿美元下降6%。</blockquote></p><p> While rates remain at rock-bottom levels, there are signs that lending is picking up. Outstanding loans and leases totaled $918.93 billion in the second quarter, up 2% from $903.09 billion in the first quarter but down from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>尽管利率仍处于最低水平，但有迹象表明贷款正在回升。第二季度未偿贷款和租赁总额为9189.3亿美元，比第一季度的9030.9亿美元增长2%，但比去年同期有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Noninterest income, which includes fees, fell 2% to $11.23 billion, from $11.48 billion a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>包括费用在内的非利息收入从去年同期的 114.8 亿美元下降 2% 至 112.3 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America, like its peers, suffered from a drop in trading, though its decline wasn’t as big. Adjusted trading revenue fell 19% to $3.6 billion from $4.41 billion a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行和同行一样，交易量也出现了下滑，尽管跌幅并不大。调整后贸易收入从去年同期的 44.1 亿美元下降 19% 至 36 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But investors have also been watching Bank of America’s expenses, which rose 12% from a year earlier to $15.05 billion due partly to higher compensation costs.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者也一直在关注美国银行的支出，美国银行的支出同比增长 12%，达到 150.5 亿美元，部分原因是薪酬成本上升。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bank of America’s Profit More Than Doubles, but Revenue Takes a Hit<blockquote>美国银行利润翻了一番多，但收入受到打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBank of America’s Profit More Than Doubles, but Revenue Takes a Hit<blockquote>美国银行利润翻了一番多，但收入受到打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Wall Street Journal</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-15 15:51</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Like its peers, the bank continued to release money it had set aside for the coronavirus recession.  Bank of AmericaCorp.BAC-2.51%said the economic rebound helped to more than double its profit, but low rates weighed on its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>与同行一样，该银行继续释放为应对冠状病毒衰退预留的资金。美国银行BAC-2.51%表示，经济复苏帮助其利润翻了一番以上，但低利率拖累了其收入。</blockquote></p><p> The nation’s second-largest bank by assets posted earnings Wednesday of $9.22 billion in the second quarter, up from $3.53 billion a year earlier. The bank earned $1.03 a share, beating the 77 cents forecast by analysts polled by FactSet.</p><p><blockquote>这家按资产计算的全美第二大银行周三公布的第二季度盈利为 92.2 亿美元，高于去年同期的 35.3 亿美元。该银行每股收益为 1.03 美元，超过了 FactSet 调查的分析师预测的 77 美分。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America’s bottom line was lifted by its decision to release $2.2 billion of reserves it had set aside during the depths of the coronavirus pandemic to protect against a wave of soured loans. Like peers including JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co., Bank of America has beenreleasing its loan-loss stockpilesas theU.S. economy rebounds.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行决定释放在冠状病毒大流行最严重时期预留的 22 亿美元准备金，以抵御一波不良贷款，这提高了美国银行的底线。与摩根大通等同行一样，美国银行一直在释放其贷款损失股票。经济反弹。</blockquote></p><p> “Consumer spending has significantly surpassed pre-pandemic levels, deposit growth is strong and loan levels have begun to grow,” CEO Brian Moynihan said.</p><p><blockquote>“首席执行官布莱恩-莫伊尼汉（Brian Moynihan）说：”消费者支出已大大超过大流行前的水平，存款增长强劲，贷款水平也开始增长。</blockquote></p><p> Still, revenue in the second quarter was $21.47 billion, down 4% from $22.33 billion a year earlier. That missed analysts’ expectations of $21.8 billion. Bank of America has been the only major U.S. bank so far to miss analysts’ revenue predictions.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，第二季度的收入仍为 214.7 亿美元，比去年同期的 223.3 亿美元下降了 4%。这低于分析师预期的 218 亿美元。美国银行是迄今为止唯一一家未能达到分析师收入预测的美国大型银行。</blockquote></p><p> Investment-banking fees were a bright spot at JPMorgan andGoldman Sachs GroupInc.,which took advantage of companies’ thirst for deal making and posted double-digit gains in their investment-banking revenue. At Bank of America, however, investment-banking fees were down almost 2% to $2.12 billion. Advisory fees for mergers and acquisitions trailed peers.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通（JPMorgan）和高盛集团（Goldman Sachs GroupInc.）的投资银行手续费是一个亮点，它们利用了公司对交易的渴望，投资银行收入实现了两位数的增长。然而，美国银行的投资银行业务费用下降了近 2%，至 21.2 亿美元。并购咨询费落后于同行。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America stock fell 2.5%. Still, bank stocks have outperformed the broader stock market this year as investors buy them to bet on the economic rebound.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行股价下跌 2.5%。尽管如此，银行股今年的表现仍优于大盘，因为投资者买入银行股是为了押注经济复苏。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America and its peers sit at the center of the U.S. economy. They have benefited from the reopening of businesses,record-high stock pricesand people’s increased willingness to spend after a year of hunkering down.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行及其同行处于美国经济的中心。他们受益于企业重新开业、股价创历史新高以及人们在蛰伏一年后消费意愿的增强。</blockquote></p><p> But low rates and tepid loan demand have challenged banks. Bank of America in particular is sensitive to interest rates. Net interest income of $10.23 billion in the second quarter was down 6% from $10.85 billion a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>但低利率和不温不火的贷款需求给银行带来了挑战。美国银行尤其对利率敏感。第二季度净利息收入为102.3亿美元，比去年同期的108.5亿美元下降6%。</blockquote></p><p> While rates remain at rock-bottom levels, there are signs that lending is picking up. Outstanding loans and leases totaled $918.93 billion in the second quarter, up 2% from $903.09 billion in the first quarter but down from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>尽管利率仍处于最低水平，但有迹象表明贷款正在回升。第二季度未偿贷款和租赁总额为9189.3亿美元，比第一季度的9030.9亿美元增长2%，但比去年同期有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> Noninterest income, which includes fees, fell 2% to $11.23 billion, from $11.48 billion a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>包括费用在内的非利息收入从去年同期的 114.8 亿美元下降 2% 至 112.3 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America, like its peers, suffered from a drop in trading, though its decline wasn’t as big. Adjusted trading revenue fell 19% to $3.6 billion from $4.41 billion a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行和同行一样，交易量也出现了下滑，尽管跌幅并不大。调整后贸易收入从去年同期的 44.1 亿美元下降 19% 至 36 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> But investors have also been watching Bank of America’s expenses, which rose 12% from a year earlier to $15.05 billion due partly to higher compensation costs.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者也一直在关注美国银行的支出，美国银行的支出同比增长 12%，达到 150.5 亿美元，部分原因是薪酬成本上升。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/bank-of-americas-profit-more-than-doubles-11626260663\">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BAC":"美国银行"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/bank-of-americas-profit-more-than-doubles-11626260663","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104036057","content_text":"Like its peers, the bank continued to release money it had set aside for the coronavirus recession.\n\nBank of AmericaCorp.BAC-2.51%said the economic rebound helped to more than double its profit, but low rates weighed on its revenue.\nThe nation’s second-largest bank by assets posted earnings Wednesday of $9.22 billion in the second quarter, up from $3.53 billion a year earlier. The bank earned $1.03 a share, beating the 77 cents forecast by analysts polled by FactSet.\nBank of America’s bottom line was lifted by its decision to release $2.2 billion of reserves it had set aside during the depths of the coronavirus pandemic to protect against a wave of soured loans. Like peers including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America has beenreleasing its loan-loss stockpilesas theU.S. economy rebounds.\n“Consumer spending has significantly surpassed pre-pandemic levels, deposit growth is strong and loan levels have begun to grow,” CEO Brian Moynihan said.\nStill, revenue in the second quarter was $21.47 billion, down 4% from $22.33 billion a year earlier. That missed analysts’ expectations of $21.8 billion. Bank of America has been the only major U.S. bank so far to miss analysts’ revenue predictions.\nInvestment-banking fees were a bright spot at JPMorgan andGoldman Sachs GroupInc.,which took advantage of companies’ thirst for deal making and posted double-digit gains in their investment-banking revenue. At Bank of America, however, investment-banking fees were down almost 2% to $2.12 billion. Advisory fees for mergers and acquisitions trailed peers.\nBank of America stock fell 2.5%. Still, bank stocks have outperformed the broader stock market this year as investors buy them to bet on the economic rebound.\nBank of America and its peers sit at the center of the U.S. economy. They have benefited from the reopening of businesses,record-high stock pricesand people’s increased willingness to spend after a year of hunkering down.\nBut low rates and tepid loan demand have challenged banks. Bank of America in particular is sensitive to interest rates. Net interest income of $10.23 billion in the second quarter was down 6% from $10.85 billion a year earlier.\nWhile rates remain at rock-bottom levels, there are signs that lending is picking up. Outstanding loans and leases totaled $918.93 billion in the second quarter, up 2% from $903.09 billion in the first quarter but down from a year ago.\nNoninterest income, which includes fees, fell 2% to $11.23 billion, from $11.48 billion a year earlier.\nBank of America, like its peers, suffered from a drop in trading, though its decline wasn’t as big. Adjusted trading revenue fell 19% to $3.6 billion from $4.41 billion a year earlier.\nBut investors have also been watching Bank of America’s expenses, which rose 12% from a year earlier to $15.05 billion due partly to higher compensation costs.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2262,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144918601,"gmtCreate":1626260479603,"gmtModify":1631891823619,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/144918601","repostId":"2151158165","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151158165","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626259561,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2151158165?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-14 18:46","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate<blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 $1.03 超出预期 $0.77，销售额 $21.50B，低于预期 $21.83B</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151158165","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"-Dow Jones","content":"<p>Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 1.03 美元，超出预期 0.77 美元，销售额 21.50B 美元，低于预期 21.83B 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America Corp reported a jump in second-quarter profit on Wednesday as it released reserves it had set aside last year to cover potential loan losses tied to the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行周三公布第二季度利润大幅增长，因为它释放了去年留出的准备金，以弥补与疫情相关的潜在贷款损失。</blockquote></p><p> The bank’s net income applicable to common shareholders rose to $8.96 billion, or $1.03 per share, from $3.28 billion, or 37 cents per share, a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>该银行普通股股东的净利润从去年同期的 32.8 亿美元（每股 37 美分）增至 89.6 亿美元，即每股 1.03 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts on average had expected a profit of 77 cents per share, according to IBES estimate from Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>根据 IBES 对路孚特的估计，分析师平均预期每股利润为 77 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The Federal Reserve last year brought in ultra-low interest rates to allow for a more rapid recovery from the pandemic-induced recession. Such low rates eat into the income of lenders like Bank of America, which make profit from the difference between what they earn on loans and pay out on deposits.</p><p><blockquote>美联储去年引入了超低利率，以便从大流行引发的衰退中更快地复苏。如此低的利率侵蚀了美国银行等贷款机构的收入，这些机构从贷款收入和存款支出之间的差额中获利。</blockquote></p><p> Strong momentum in job growth and vaccinations against COVID-19 have underpinned a recovery in the broader economy, However, Wall Street’s biggest banks are still expected to feel the pinch from low rates.</p><p><blockquote>就业增长的强劲势头和针对 COVID-19 的疫苗接种支撑了整体经济的复苏，然而，华尔街最大的银行预计仍将感受到低利率带来的压力。</blockquote></p><p> Executives at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co warned on Tuesday that the sunny outlook for the U.S. economy would not make for blockbuster revenues in the short term due to low interest rates, weak loan demand and a slowdown in trading.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通高管周二警告称，由于低利率、贷款需求疲软和贸易放缓，美国经济的乐观前景不会在短期内带来巨额收入。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, released $2.2 billion of reserves in the quarter, reflecting the improved economic outlook. The release, however, was lower than the $2.7 billion it had set aside in the previous quarter.</p><p><blockquote>按资产计算，美国第二大银行美国银行本季度释放了 22 亿美元的准备金，反映出经济前景的改善。然而，此次发行低于上一季度预留的 27 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Overall revenue, net of interest expense, dropped 4% to $21.5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>扣除利息支出后的总收入下降 4% 至 215 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank&nbsp;of&nbsp;America&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;2%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行股价在盘前交易中下跌 2%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/afdc90bc748a5b7b5f8f4aa42de529dc\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"622\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate<blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 $1.03 超出预期 $0.77，销售额 $21.50B，低于预期 $21.83B</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate<blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 $1.03 超出预期 $0.77，销售额 $21.50B，低于预期 $21.83B</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-14 18:46</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 1.03 美元，超出预期 0.77 美元，销售额 21.50B 美元，低于预期 21.83B 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America Corp reported a jump in second-quarter profit on Wednesday as it released reserves it had set aside last year to cover potential loan losses tied to the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行周三公布第二季度利润大幅增长，因为它释放了去年留出的准备金，以弥补与疫情相关的潜在贷款损失。</blockquote></p><p> The bank’s net income applicable to common shareholders rose to $8.96 billion, or $1.03 per share, from $3.28 billion, or 37 cents per share, a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>该银行普通股股东的净利润从去年同期的 32.8 亿美元（每股 37 美分）增至 89.6 亿美元，即每股 1.03 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts on average had expected a profit of 77 cents per share, according to IBES estimate from Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>根据 IBES 对路孚特的估计，分析师平均预期每股利润为 77 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The Federal Reserve last year brought in ultra-low interest rates to allow for a more rapid recovery from the pandemic-induced recession. Such low rates eat into the income of lenders like Bank of America, which make profit from the difference between what they earn on loans and pay out on deposits.</p><p><blockquote>美联储去年引入了超低利率，以便从大流行引发的衰退中更快地复苏。如此低的利率侵蚀了美国银行等贷款机构的收入，这些机构从贷款收入和存款支出之间的差额中获利。</blockquote></p><p> Strong momentum in job growth and vaccinations against COVID-19 have underpinned a recovery in the broader economy, However, Wall Street’s biggest banks are still expected to feel the pinch from low rates.</p><p><blockquote>就业增长的强劲势头和针对 COVID-19 的疫苗接种支撑了整体经济的复苏，然而，华尔街最大的银行预计仍将感受到低利率带来的压力。</blockquote></p><p> Executives at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co warned on Tuesday that the sunny outlook for the U.S. economy would not make for blockbuster revenues in the short term due to low interest rates, weak loan demand and a slowdown in trading.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通高管周二警告称，由于低利率、贷款需求疲软和贸易放缓，美国经济的乐观前景不会在短期内带来巨额收入。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, released $2.2 billion of reserves in the quarter, reflecting the improved economic outlook. The release, however, was lower than the $2.7 billion it had set aside in the previous quarter.</p><p><blockquote>按资产计算，美国第二大银行美国银行本季度释放了 22 亿美元的准备金，反映出经济前景的改善。然而，此次发行低于上一季度预留的 27 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Overall revenue, net of interest expense, dropped 4% to $21.5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>扣除利息支出后的总收入下降 4% 至 215 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank&nbsp;of&nbsp;America&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;2%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行股价在盘前交易中下跌 2%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/afdc90bc748a5b7b5f8f4aa42de529dc\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"622\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QTWO":"Q2 Holdings Inc","BAC":"美国银行"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151158165","content_text":"Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate.\nBank of America Corp reported a jump in second-quarter profit on Wednesday as it released reserves it had set aside last year to cover potential loan losses tied to the pandemic.\nThe bank’s net income applicable to common shareholders rose to $8.96 billion, or $1.03 per share, from $3.28 billion, or 37 cents per share, a year earlier.\nAnalysts on average had expected a profit of 77 cents per share, according to IBES estimate from Refinitiv.\nThe Federal Reserve last year brought in ultra-low interest rates to allow for a more rapid recovery from the pandemic-induced recession. Such low rates eat into the income of lenders like Bank of America, which make profit from the difference between what they earn on loans and pay out on deposits.\nStrong momentum in job growth and vaccinations against COVID-19 have underpinned a recovery in the broader economy, However, Wall Street’s biggest banks are still expected to feel the pinch from low rates.\nExecutives at JPMorgan Chase & Co warned on Tuesday that the sunny outlook for the U.S. economy would not make for blockbuster revenues in the short term due to low interest rates, weak loan demand and a slowdown in trading.\nBank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, released $2.2 billion of reserves in the quarter, reflecting the improved economic outlook. The release, however, was lower than the $2.7 billion it had set aside in the previous quarter.\nOverall revenue, net of interest expense, dropped 4% to $21.5 billion.\nBank of America shares fell 2% in premarket trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QTWO":0.9,"BAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2192,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142295796,"gmtCreate":1626151059315,"gmtModify":1631891823633,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/142295796","repostId":"1101566017","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1928,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146352894,"gmtCreate":1626055331818,"gmtModify":1631891823652,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/146352894","repostId":"1131677097","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3315,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":141408696,"gmtCreate":1625883414315,"gmtModify":1631891823656,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/141408696","repostId":"1195812364","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195812364","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625875523,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1195812364?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-10 08:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO Week Ahead: Real estate, post-pandemic plays and more in an 9 IPO week<blockquote>美国 IPO 周即将到来：房地产、大流行后的戏剧等 IPO 周第 9 周</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195812364","media":"Renaissance Capital","summary":"Italian drug container supplier Stevanato Group plans to raise $900 million at a $6.8 billion market cap. Controlled by its founding family, the profitable company supplies glass vials, syringes, and other medical-grade containers to more than 700 customers, including 41 of the top 50 pharmaceutical companies.Shopping center REIT Phillips Edison & Company plans to raise $502 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. This REIT owns equity interests in 300 shopping centers across the US, focusing on l","content":"<p>After a slow holiday week, nine IPOs are scheduled to raise over $3 billion in the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在度过了缓慢的假期周之后，未来一周将有 9 笔 IPO 筹集超过 30 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Italian drug container supplier&nbsp;<b>Stevanato Group</b>(STVN) plans to raise $900 million at a $6.8 billion market cap. Controlled by its founding family, the profitable company supplies glass vials, syringes, and other medical-grade containers to more than 700 customers, including 41 of the top 50 pharmaceutical companies.</p><p><blockquote>意大利药品容器供应商<b>斯特瓦纳托集团</b>(STVN) 计划以 68 亿美元的市值筹集 9 亿美元。这家盈利的公司由其创始家族控制，为 700 多家客户提供玻璃小瓶、注射器和其他医疗级容器，其中包括 41 家排名前 50 的制药公司。</blockquote></p><p> Shopping center REIT&nbsp;<b>Phillips Edison &amp; Company</b>(PECO) plans to raise $502 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. This REIT owns equity interests in 300 shopping centers across the US, focusing on locations that are anchored by grocers like Kroger and Public. It targets a 3.5% annualized yield at the midpoint.</p><p><blockquote>购物中心产业信讬基金<b>菲利普斯爱迪生公司</b>(PECO) 计划以 37 亿美元的市值筹集 5.02 亿美元。该房地产投资信托基金拥有美国 300 家购物中心的股权，专注于 Kroger 和 Public 等杂货商经营的地点。它的目标是中点年化收益率为 3.5%。</blockquote></p><p> Known for its member-only luxury hotel brand Soho House,<b>Membership Collective Group</b>(MCG) plans to raise $450 at a $3.2 billion market cap. The company boasts a large and loyal member base, though it has no track record of profitability and saw revenue fall by almost half in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>以会员专属豪华酒店品牌Soho House而闻名，<b>会员资格集体组</b>(MCG) 计划以 32 亿美元的市值筹集 450 美元。该公司拥有庞大而忠诚的会员基础，尽管它没有盈利记录，并且在2021年第一季度的收入下降了近一半。</blockquote></p><p> Mark Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise&nbsp;<b>F45 Training</b>(FXLV) plans to raise $325 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. Specializing in 45-minute workouts, F45 has over 1,500 studios worldwide. The company managed a 37% EBITDA in the trailing 12 months, though the company’s expected post-pandemic growth has yet to show through in the numbers.</p><p><blockquote>马克·沃尔伯格支持的健身特许经营权<b>F45训练</b>(FXLV) 计划以 15 亿美元的市值筹集 3.25 亿美元。F45专注于45分钟的锻炼，在全球拥有1500多个工作室。该公司在过去 12 个月中实现了 37% 的 EBITDA，尽管该公司预期的大流行后增长尚未在数据中体现出来。</blockquote></p><p> Mortgage software provider&nbsp;<b>Blend Labs</b>(BLND) plans to raise $340 million at a $4.5 billion market cap. Blend Labs provides a digital platform to financial services firms that improves the consumer experience when applying for mortgages and loans. Despite doubling revenue in 2020, the core software business is highly unprofitable due to R&amp;D and S&amp;M spend.</p><p><blockquote>抵押软件提供商<b>混合实验室</b>(BLND) 计划以 45 亿美元的市值筹集 3.4 亿美元。Blend Labs为金融服务公司提供了一个数字平台，改善了消费者申请抵押贷款和贷款时的体验。尽管2020年收入翻了一番，但由于R&amp;D和S&amp;M支出，核心软件业务高度无利可图。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Bridge Investment Group</b>(BRDG) plans to raise $300 million at a $1.8 billion market cap. This investment manager specializes in real estate equity and debt across multiple sectors. As of 3/31/2021, Bridge Investment Group has approximately $26 billion of AUM with more than 6,500 individual investors across 25 investment vehicles.</p><p><blockquote><b>桥梁投资集团</b>(BRDG) 计划以 18 亿美元的市值筹集 3 亿美元。这位投资经理专门从事多个行业的房地产股权和债务。截至2021年3月31日，Bridge Investment Group拥有约260亿美元的资产管理规模，拥有25种投资工具的6,500多名个人投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Ocular medical device provider&nbsp;<b>Sight Sciences</b>(SGHT) plans to raise $150 million at a $1 billion market cap. The company develops and sells medical and surgical devices that present new treatment options for eye diseases. The highly unprofitable company showed signs of re-accelerating growth in the 1Q21 (+32%) after the pandemic delayed elective procedures in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>眼科医疗器械供应商<b>视觉科学</b>(SGHT) 计划以 10 亿美元的市值筹集 1.5 亿美元。该公司开发和销售医疗和外科设备，为眼部疾病提供新的治疗选择。在疫情推迟了2020年的选择性程序后，这家高度无利可图的公司在2021年第一季度显示出重新加速增长的迹象（+32%）。</blockquote></p><p> Pregnancy diagnostics company&nbsp;<b>Sera Prognostics</b>(SERA) plans to raise $75 million at a $564 million market cap. The company uses its proteomics and bioinformatics platform to develop biomarker tests aimed at improving pregnancy outcomes. Sera Prognostics’ sole commercial product, the PreTRM test, predicts the risk of a premature delivery, though it has yet to generate meaningful revenue.</p><p><blockquote>妊娠诊断公司<b>血清预后</b>（SERA）计划以5.64亿美元的市值筹集7500万美元。该公司利用其蛋白质组学和生物信息学平台开发生物标志物测试，旨在改善妊娠结局。Sera Prognostics 的唯一商业产品 PreTRM 测试可以预测早产的风险，但尚未产生有意义的收入。</blockquote></p><p> A hold-over from last week, early-stage kidney disease biotech&nbsp;<b>Unicycive Therapeutics</b>(UNCY) plans to raise $25 million at a $79 million market cap.</p><p><blockquote>上周的延迟，早期肾病生物技术<b>Unicycive 疗法</b>(UNCY) 计划以 7900 万美元的市值筹集 2500 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3dc9b07583a28aad047e44802c899e\" tg-width=\"942\" tg-height=\"732\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/8/21, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 0.8% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 15.0%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 5.2% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 7.3%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Smoore International and EQT Partners.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至21年7月8日，文艺复兴IPO指数年初至今下跌0.8%，而标普500上涨15.0%。Renaissance Capital 的 IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）追踪该指数，持有量最大的 ETF 包括 Snowflake (SNOW) 和 Palantir Technologies (PLTR)。Renaissance International IPO 指数今年迄今下跌 5.2%，而 ACWX 指数上涨 7.3%。Renaissance Capital 的国际 IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）追踪该指数，持有的 ETF 包括 Smoore International 和 EQT Partners。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603787993745","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO Week Ahead: Real estate, post-pandemic plays and more in an 9 IPO week<blockquote>美国 IPO 周即将到来：房地产、大流行后的戏剧等 IPO 周第 9 周</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO Week Ahead: Real estate, post-pandemic plays and more in an 9 IPO week<blockquote>美国 IPO 周即将到来：房地产、大流行后的戏剧等 IPO 周第 9 周</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Renaissance Capital</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-10 08:05</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After a slow holiday week, nine IPOs are scheduled to raise over $3 billion in the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在度过了缓慢的假期周之后，未来一周将有 9 笔 IPO 筹集超过 30 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Italian drug container supplier&nbsp;<b>Stevanato Group</b>(STVN) plans to raise $900 million at a $6.8 billion market cap. Controlled by its founding family, the profitable company supplies glass vials, syringes, and other medical-grade containers to more than 700 customers, including 41 of the top 50 pharmaceutical companies.</p><p><blockquote>意大利药品容器供应商<b>斯特瓦纳托集团</b>(STVN) 计划以 68 亿美元的市值筹集 9 亿美元。这家盈利的公司由其创始家族控制，为 700 多家客户提供玻璃小瓶、注射器和其他医疗级容器，其中包括 41 家排名前 50 的制药公司。</blockquote></p><p> Shopping center REIT&nbsp;<b>Phillips Edison &amp; Company</b>(PECO) plans to raise $502 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. This REIT owns equity interests in 300 shopping centers across the US, focusing on locations that are anchored by grocers like Kroger and Public. It targets a 3.5% annualized yield at the midpoint.</p><p><blockquote>购物中心产业信讬基金<b>菲利普斯爱迪生公司</b>(PECO) 计划以 37 亿美元的市值筹集 5.02 亿美元。该房地产投资信托基金拥有美国 300 家购物中心的股权，专注于 Kroger 和 Public 等杂货商经营的地点。它的目标是中点年化收益率为 3.5%。</blockquote></p><p> Known for its member-only luxury hotel brand Soho House,<b>Membership Collective Group</b>(MCG) plans to raise $450 at a $3.2 billion market cap. The company boasts a large and loyal member base, though it has no track record of profitability and saw revenue fall by almost half in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>以会员专属豪华酒店品牌Soho House而闻名，<b>会员资格集体组</b>(MCG) 计划以 32 亿美元的市值筹集 450 美元。该公司拥有庞大而忠诚的会员基础，尽管它没有盈利记录，并且在2021年第一季度的收入下降了近一半。</blockquote></p><p> Mark Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise&nbsp;<b>F45 Training</b>(FXLV) plans to raise $325 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. Specializing in 45-minute workouts, F45 has over 1,500 studios worldwide. The company managed a 37% EBITDA in the trailing 12 months, though the company’s expected post-pandemic growth has yet to show through in the numbers.</p><p><blockquote>马克·沃尔伯格支持的健身特许经营权<b>F45训练</b>(FXLV) 计划以 15 亿美元的市值筹集 3.25 亿美元。F45专注于45分钟的锻炼，在全球拥有1500多个工作室。该公司在过去 12 个月中实现了 37% 的 EBITDA，尽管该公司预期的大流行后增长尚未在数据中体现出来。</blockquote></p><p> Mortgage software provider&nbsp;<b>Blend Labs</b>(BLND) plans to raise $340 million at a $4.5 billion market cap. Blend Labs provides a digital platform to financial services firms that improves the consumer experience when applying for mortgages and loans. Despite doubling revenue in 2020, the core software business is highly unprofitable due to R&amp;D and S&amp;M spend.</p><p><blockquote>抵押软件提供商<b>混合实验室</b>(BLND) 计划以 45 亿美元的市值筹集 3.4 亿美元。Blend Labs为金融服务公司提供了一个数字平台，改善了消费者申请抵押贷款和贷款时的体验。尽管2020年收入翻了一番，但由于R&amp;D和S&amp;M支出，核心软件业务高度无利可图。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Bridge Investment Group</b>(BRDG) plans to raise $300 million at a $1.8 billion market cap. This investment manager specializes in real estate equity and debt across multiple sectors. As of 3/31/2021, Bridge Investment Group has approximately $26 billion of AUM with more than 6,500 individual investors across 25 investment vehicles.</p><p><blockquote><b>桥梁投资集团</b>(BRDG) 计划以 18 亿美元的市值筹集 3 亿美元。这位投资经理专门从事多个行业的房地产股权和债务。截至2021年3月31日，Bridge Investment Group拥有约260亿美元的资产管理规模，拥有25种投资工具的6,500多名个人投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Ocular medical device provider&nbsp;<b>Sight Sciences</b>(SGHT) plans to raise $150 million at a $1 billion market cap. The company develops and sells medical and surgical devices that present new treatment options for eye diseases. The highly unprofitable company showed signs of re-accelerating growth in the 1Q21 (+32%) after the pandemic delayed elective procedures in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>眼科医疗器械供应商<b>视觉科学</b>(SGHT) 计划以 10 亿美元的市值筹集 1.5 亿美元。该公司开发和销售医疗和外科设备，为眼部疾病提供新的治疗选择。在疫情推迟了2020年的选择性程序后，这家高度无利可图的公司在2021年第一季度显示出重新加速增长的迹象（+32%）。</blockquote></p><p> Pregnancy diagnostics company&nbsp;<b>Sera Prognostics</b>(SERA) plans to raise $75 million at a $564 million market cap. The company uses its proteomics and bioinformatics platform to develop biomarker tests aimed at improving pregnancy outcomes. Sera Prognostics’ sole commercial product, the PreTRM test, predicts the risk of a premature delivery, though it has yet to generate meaningful revenue.</p><p><blockquote>妊娠诊断公司<b>血清预后</b>（SERA）计划以5.64亿美元的市值筹集7500万美元。该公司利用其蛋白质组学和生物信息学平台开发生物标志物测试，旨在改善妊娠结局。Sera Prognostics 的唯一商业产品 PreTRM 测试可以预测早产的风险，但尚未产生有意义的收入。</blockquote></p><p> A hold-over from last week, early-stage kidney disease biotech&nbsp;<b>Unicycive Therapeutics</b>(UNCY) plans to raise $25 million at a $79 million market cap.</p><p><blockquote>上周的延迟，早期肾病生物技术<b>Unicycive 疗法</b>(UNCY) 计划以 7900 万美元的市值筹集 2500 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3dc9b07583a28aad047e44802c899e\" tg-width=\"942\" tg-height=\"732\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/8/21, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 0.8% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 15.0%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 5.2% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 7.3%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Smoore International and EQT Partners.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至21年7月8日，文艺复兴IPO指数年初至今下跌0.8%，而标普500上涨15.0%。Renaissance Capital 的 IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）追踪该指数，持有量最大的 ETF 包括 Snowflake (SNOW) 和 Palantir Technologies (PLTR)。Renaissance International IPO 指数今年迄今下跌 5.2%，而 ACWX 指数上涨 7.3%。Renaissance Capital 的国际 IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）追踪该指数，持有的 ETF 包括 Smoore International 和 EQT Partners。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83879/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Real-estate-post-pandemic-plays-and-more-in-an-9-IPO-week\">Renaissance Capital</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","BRDG":"Bridge Investment Group Holdings Inc.","SGHT":"Sight Sciences, Inc.",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SERA":"Sera Prognostics, Inc.","FXLV":"F45 Training Holdings Inc.","BLND":"Blend Labs, Inc.","PECO":"Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","STVN":"Stevanato Group S.p.A."},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83879/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Real-estate-post-pandemic-plays-and-more-in-an-9-IPO-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195812364","content_text":"After a slow holiday week, nine IPOs are scheduled to raise over $3 billion in the week ahead.\nItalian drug container supplier Stevanato Group(STVN) plans to raise $900 million at a $6.8 billion market cap. Controlled by its founding family, the profitable company supplies glass vials, syringes, and other medical-grade containers to more than 700 customers, including 41 of the top 50 pharmaceutical companies.\nShopping center REIT Phillips Edison & Company(PECO) plans to raise $502 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. This REIT owns equity interests in 300 shopping centers across the US, focusing on locations that are anchored by grocers like Kroger and Public. It targets a 3.5% annualized yield at the midpoint.\nKnown for its member-only luxury hotel brand Soho House,Membership Collective Group(MCG) plans to raise $450 at a $3.2 billion market cap. The company boasts a large and loyal member base, though it has no track record of profitability and saw revenue fall by almost half in the 1Q21.\nMark Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise F45 Training(FXLV) plans to raise $325 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. Specializing in 45-minute workouts, F45 has over 1,500 studios worldwide. The company managed a 37% EBITDA in the trailing 12 months, though the company’s expected post-pandemic growth has yet to show through in the numbers.\nMortgage software provider Blend Labs(BLND) plans to raise $340 million at a $4.5 billion market cap. Blend Labs provides a digital platform to financial services firms that improves the consumer experience when applying for mortgages and loans. Despite doubling revenue in 2020, the core software business is highly unprofitable due to R&D and S&M spend.\nBridge Investment Group(BRDG) plans to raise $300 million at a $1.8 billion market cap. This investment manager specializes in real estate equity and debt across multiple sectors. As of 3/31/2021, Bridge Investment Group has approximately $26 billion of AUM with more than 6,500 individual investors across 25 investment vehicles.\nOcular medical device provider Sight Sciences(SGHT) plans to raise $150 million at a $1 billion market cap. The company develops and sells medical and surgical devices that present new treatment options for eye diseases. The highly unprofitable company showed signs of re-accelerating growth in the 1Q21 (+32%) after the pandemic delayed elective procedures in 2020.\nPregnancy diagnostics company Sera Prognostics(SERA) plans to raise $75 million at a $564 million market cap. The company uses its proteomics and bioinformatics platform to develop biomarker tests aimed at improving pregnancy outcomes. Sera Prognostics’ sole commercial product, the PreTRM test, predicts the risk of a premature delivery, though it has yet to generate meaningful revenue.\nA hold-over from last week, early-stage kidney disease biotech Unicycive Therapeutics(UNCY) plans to raise $25 million at a $79 million market cap.\n\nIPO Market Snapshot\nThe Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/8/21, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 0.8% year-to-date, while the S&P 500 was up 15.0%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 5.2% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 7.3%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Smoore International and EQT Partners.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PECO":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"BRDG":0.9,"SERA":0.9,"STVN":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"FXLV":0.9,"SGHT":0.9,"MCG":0.9,"BLND":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2172,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143557011,"gmtCreate":1625804280733,"gmtModify":1631891823669,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/143557011","repostId":"1135632463","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1135632463","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625800249,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1135632463?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-09 11:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Opinion: 10 companies that know how to spend money so you have a chance to make some<blockquote>观点：10 家知道如何花钱的公司，这样你就有机会赚钱</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1135632463","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"Share buybacks can add value to all corporate constituents — shareholders, employees and customers\nS","content":"<p>Share buybacks can add value to all corporate constituents — shareholders, employees and customers</p><p><blockquote>股票回购可以为所有公司成员（股东、员工和客户）增加价值</blockquote></p><p> Share buybacks are surprisingly controversial. A share buyback is when a company repurchases its own shares, which reduces its shares outstanding.&nbsp; By reducing the number of shares, buybacks effectively allocate a greater portion of corporate capital to remaining investors. For example, earnings per share increases.</p><p><blockquote>股票回购引发了令人惊讶的争议。股票回购是指公司回购自己的股票，从而减少其流通股。通过减少股票数量，回购有效地将更大一部分公司资本分配给剩余的投资者。例如，每股收益增加。</blockquote></p><p> Share buybacks add value to all corporate constituents — shareholders, employees, customers — when capital allocation follows two rules. One: buybacks are made with excess cash after the company has reinvested to maintain or grow the profitability of its current business, whether organically or through acquisitions. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a>: buybacks are made only at share prices below business value—a corporation that overpays for anything, including its own shares, destroys corporate value.</p><p><blockquote>当资本分配遵循两条规则时，股票回购会为所有公司组成部分（股东、员工、客户）增加价值。一：回购是在公司进行再投资以维持或提高当前业务的盈利能力后，用多余现金进行的，无论是有机的还是通过收购的。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">二</a>：回购只能以低于商业价值的股价进行——一家公司为任何东西（包括自己的股票）支付过高的价格都会破坏公司价值。</blockquote></p><p> Some critics protest buybacks for the wrong reasons. They complain of transferring corporate cash to shareholders when employees deserve a raise and customers a price cut.&nbsp; But this overlooks Rule One: skimping on employees and stiffing customers are anathema to any corporation and all its long-term shareholders, particularly stock pickers who construct a selective portfolio of high-quality stocks (called quality shareholders).</p><p><blockquote>一些批评者以错误的理由抗议回购。他们抱怨把公司现金转给股东，而员工理应加薪，客户理应降价。但这忽略了第一条规则：吝啬员工和压制客户是任何公司及其所有长期股东的诅咒，尤其是那些精心构建优质股票投资组合的选股者（称为优质股东）。</blockquote></p><p> There are only two types of potential beneficiaries of so diverting cash to share buybacks. The first are transient (short-term) shareholders who don’t care about Rule <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">Two</a>: they are happy to cash in at an inflated price even if in the process the company destroys value for remaining shareholders, employees and customers. The second are managers who don’t care about either Rule because their pay is tied heavily to current stock price or current earnings per share.</p><p><blockquote>这种将现金转移到股票回购的潜在受益者只有两种类型。首先是不在乎规则的短期股东<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">二</a>：他们乐于以虚高的价格兑现，即使在此过程中公司会破坏剩余股东、员工和客户的价值。第二种是不关心这两条规则的管理者，因为他们的薪酬与当前股价或当前每股收益密切相关。</blockquote></p><p> Faithful managerial stewards who adhere to buyback Rules One and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a>, however, add value for all corporate constituencies. Three of the best corporate managers of all time pioneered and perfected the proper execution of share buyback programs over several decades dating to the 1970s: Kay <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GHC\">Graham</a> of The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WASH\">Washington</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POST\">Post</a> Co., Larry Tisch of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/L\">Loews</a> Corporation, and Henry Singleton of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDY\">Teledyne</a>. All ran decades-long,&nbsp;on-and-off, buyback programs based on these principles — buying only when price was low and there were no better uses of cash.</p><p><blockquote>遵守回购规则一和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">二</a>然而，它为所有企业群体增加了价值。从 20 世纪 70 年代开始的几十年里，有史以来最优秀的三位公司经理开创并完善了股票回购计划的正确执行：凯<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GHC\">格雷厄姆</a>的<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WASH\">华盛顿</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POST\">张贴</a>公司，拉里·蒂施<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/L\">勒斯</a>公司和亨利·辛格尔顿<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDY\">电信</a>所有这些公司都基于这些原则实施了长达数十年的断断续续的回购计划——只在价格低廉且没有更好的现金用途时才购买。</blockquote></p><p> These managerial titans have some clear successors among today’s corporate leaders. Among active corporate repurchasers in recent years, the following companies boast high-quality, long-term shareholder bases, as compared to transients, who own shares fleetingly, and indexers, who own indiscriminately.</p><p><blockquote>这些管理巨头在当今的企业领导者中都有一些明确的接班人。在近年来活跃的企业回购者中，以下公司拥有高质量的长期股东基础，而转瞬即逝地持有股票，指数持有者则不加区分地持有股票。</blockquote></p><p> AdobeADBE,+0.03%</p><p><blockquote>AdobeADBE，+0.03%</blockquote></p><p> AssurantAIZ,-1.67%</p><p><blockquote>保险，-1.67%</blockquote></p><p> Bank of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a> MellonBK,-2.30%</p><p><blockquote>银行<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">纽约</a>梅隆BK，-2.30%</blockquote></p><p> CDWCDW,-1.12%</p><p><blockquote>CDWCDW，-1.12%</blockquote></p><p> Deckers OutdoorDECK,-1.76%</p><p><blockquote>德克斯户外甲板，-1.76%</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBCP\">Home</a> DepotHD,-1.53%</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBCP\">家</a>存款，-1.53%</blockquote></p><p> O’Reilly AutomotiveORLY,-0.61%</p><p><blockquote>奥莱利汽车公司，-0.61%</blockquote></p><p> NVRNVR,-2.87%</p><p><blockquote>NVRNVR，-2.87%</blockquote></p><p> $Sherwin-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMB\">Williams</a>(SHW)$SHW,-1.56%</p><p><blockquote>$舍温-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMB\">威廉姆斯</a>(SHW)$SHW，-1.56%</blockquote></p><p> WalmartWMT,-0.09%</p><p><blockquote>沃尔玛WMT,-0.09%</blockquote></p><p> <b>O’Reilly</b>&nbsp;is an auto parts retailer serving both professional and amateur mechanics.&nbsp; Founded in 1957 by the O’Reilly family, the company runs some 5,600 stores generating annual revenue around $10 billion. Since its 1993 IPO, it has maintained a strong culture of employee stock ownership. The current CEO since 2018 is Greg <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00179\">Johnson</a>, who has been with the company since 2001.&nbsp;The business model is simple: buy new stores and increase sales at all stores. The result has been steady growth over two decades, with a major acquisition every two or three years and compound annual growth rate of 19%. The company offers products and services customers need and steadily adds new workers. Competitive advantages include economics of scale.</p><p><blockquote><b>奥莱利</b>是一家为专业和业余机械师提供服务的汽车零部件零售商。该公司由 O'Reilly 家族于 1957 年创立，拥有约 5600 家门店，年收入约为 100 亿美元。自1993年首次公开募股以来，该公司一直保持着浓厚的员工持股文化。自 2018 年以来的现任首席执行官是 Greg<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00179\">约翰逊</a>他从2001年开始就在公司工作。商业模式很简单：购买新店，增加所有门店的销售额。其结果是二十多年来稳步增长，每两三年就有一次重大收购，年复合增长率为19%。公司提供客户需要的产品和服务，并稳步增加新员工。竞争优势包括规模经济。</blockquote></p><p> Company strengths include capital allocation that emphasizes buybacks. After deploying capital to primary uses of reinvestment and acquisition, many companies adopt a combination of dividends and buybacks. Not O’Reilly, which skips the dividends and goes straight to disciplined and opportunistic buybacks: when price is well below value.&nbsp; The effect is to increase the price-earnings ratio when low and help stabilize it when high. Such an approach reflects prudent capital allocation, increases per share value to shareholders, and maintains a more rational stock price overall. O’Reilly has maintained this on-and-off buyback program since 2011. QSs include Akre Capital, Edge Point Investment Group and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T. Rowe Price</a>.</p><p><blockquote>公司的优势包括强调回购的资本配置。在将资本用于再投资和收购的主要用途后，许多公司采用股息和回购相结合的方式。而不是 O'Reilly，它跳过了股息，直接进行有纪律的机会主义回购：当价格远低于价值时。其效果是在市盈率较低时提高市盈率，在市盈率较高时帮助稳定市盈率。这种做法体现了审慎的资本分配，增加了股东的每股价值，并整体维持了较为理性的股价。O'Reilly 自 2011 年以来一直维持着这一断断续续的回购计划。QS 包括 Akre Capital、Edge Point Investment Group 和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T.罗·普莱斯</a>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>CDW</b>, a global leader in integrated IT solutions with annual revenue approaching $20 billion, traces its unlikely origins to a 1984 newspaper ad selling a used computer and printer. The company’s customer-centric business model positions itself as an extension of its customers’ IT staff to help access a vast selection of tech solutions. It presents itself to vendors as a partner facilitating access to a huge customer base. After ownership by private equity from 2007, it has been public since 2013, boasting steady growth in revenue and earnings with a strong runway for sustained growth, both organic and acquired. Competitive advantages include vast scale and scope and a performance driven-culture. The current CEO since 2018 is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01210\">Christine</a> A. Leahy, who has been with CDW since 2002.</p><p><blockquote><b>CDW</b>是集成IT解决方案的全球领导者，年收入接近200亿美元，其不太可能的起源可以追溯到1984年的一则出售二手电脑和打印机的报纸广告。公司以客户为中心的商业模式将自己定位为客户 IT 人员的延伸，以帮助客户获得大量的技术解决方案。它向供应商展示自己是一个促进接触庞大客户群的合作伙伴。自 2007 年起由私募股权持有后，该公司自 2013 年起上市，收入和盈利稳步增长，拥有强劲的持续增长跑道，无论是有机增长还是收购增长。竞争优势包括巨大的规模和范围以及绩效驱动的文化。自2018年起现任行政总裁为<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01210\">克里斯汀</a>A.Leahy，自2002年以来一直在CDW工作。</blockquote></p><p> The company adopts a classic approach to rational capital allocation: a clear statement of priorities, including reinvestment and acquisitions; a goal of steady annual dividend increases, and returning excess free cash flow through buybacks. The buyback program is clearly opportunistic and maps related pricing fluctuations from period to period. CDW boasts among the highest quality shareholder bases. QSs include Alliance Bernstein, Bessemer, Fenimore Asset Management, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZ\">Lazard</a>, Mawer Investment Management, Neuberger Berman, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T. Rowe Price</a>, Wedgewood Partners, and Wellington.</p><p><blockquote>该公司采用经典的合理资本配置方法：明确说明优先事项，包括再投资和收购；目标是每年稳定增加股息，并通过回购返还多余的自由现金流。回购计划显然是机会主义的，并绘制了不同时期相关的价格波动。CDW拥有最高质量的股东基础。QSs 包括 Alliance Bernstein、Bessemer、Fenimore Asset Management、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZ\">拉扎德</a>, Mawer 投资管理公司, Neuberger Berman,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T.罗·普莱斯</a>韦奇伍德合伙人和惠灵顿。</blockquote></p><p> <b>NVR</b>&nbsp;is a regional homebuilder and mortgage banker with annual revenues of about $6 billion. Founded in 1980 and public since 1993 after a recession-induced bankruptcy, brands include Ryan Homes, which caters to first-time home buyers, and NV Homes and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HTLD\">Heartland</a> Homes, which include higher-end properties. The business model avoids costly and risky land development projects in favor of building pre-sold homes on individual lots acquired from developers on terms that minimize builder risk. Along with such a conservative strategy, NVR’s competitive advantages include relationships with developers and real estate professionals in the markets it&nbsp; serves.</p><p><blockquote><b>网络录像机</b>是一家地区性房屋建筑商和抵押贷款银行家，年收入约为 60 亿美元。该公司成立于 1980 年，自 1993 年因经济衰退破产后上市，旗下品牌包括为首次购房者提供服务的 Ryan Homes、NV Homes 和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HTLD\">中心地带</a>住宅，包括高端物业。这种商业模式避免了昂贵和高风险的土地开发项目，而是在从开发商收购的单个地块上建造预售房屋，以最大限度地降低建筑商风险。除了这种保守的战略，NVR 的竞争优势还包括与其服务市场中的开发商和房地产专业人士的关系。</blockquote></p><p> The current CEO is Paul Seville, in the role since 2005, making him <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the&nbsp;more seasoned of today’s top executives.&nbsp;NVR has long boasted the highest listed stock price other than <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK.A\">Berkshire Hathaway</a>. NVR’s stock repurchase program dates to 1994 and is known to be among the most consistent and dedicated program of its kind. Current QSs include Broad Run, Capital Group, Diamond <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIL\">Hill</a> Capital, Ensemble Capital, Giverny Capital, Smead Capital, Wellington and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T. Rowe Price</a>.</p><p><blockquote>现任首席执行官是 Paul Seville，自 2005 年起担任该职位，使他<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">一</a>当今最有经验的高管之一。长期以来，NVR 的上市股价一直是除<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK.A\">伯克希尔哈撒韦公司</a>. NVR 的股票回购计划可以追溯到 1994 年，是同类计划中最稳定、最专注的计划之一。目前的 QSs 包括 Broad Run、Capital Group、Diamond<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIL\">山丘</a>资本、Ensemble Capital、Giverny Capital、Smead Capital、惠灵顿和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T.罗·普莱斯</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Share buybacks are only controversial because they can be misused. Done right, they are wins all around.&nbsp; Fortunately, Corporate America continues to have some great managers who understand this, and many quality shareholders who appreciate them for it.</p><p><blockquote>股票回购之所以有争议，只是因为它们可能会被滥用。如果做得好，他们是全方位的胜利。幸运的是，美国企业界仍然有一些理解这一点的优秀管理者，以及许多欣赏他们的优质股东。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: 10 companies that know how to spend money so you have a chance to make some<blockquote>观点：10 家知道如何花钱的公司，这样你就有机会赚钱</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: 10 companies that know how to spend money so you have a chance to make some<blockquote>观点：10 家知道如何花钱的公司，这样你就有机会赚钱</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Market Wacth</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-09 11:10</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Share buybacks can add value to all corporate constituents — shareholders, employees and customers</p><p><blockquote>股票回购可以为所有公司成员（股东、员工和客户）增加价值</blockquote></p><p> Share buybacks are surprisingly controversial. A share buyback is when a company repurchases its own shares, which reduces its shares outstanding.&nbsp; By reducing the number of shares, buybacks effectively allocate a greater portion of corporate capital to remaining investors. For example, earnings per share increases.</p><p><blockquote>股票回购引发了令人惊讶的争议。股票回购是指公司回购自己的股票，从而减少其流通股。通过减少股票数量，回购有效地将更大一部分公司资本分配给剩余的投资者。例如，每股收益增加。</blockquote></p><p> Share buybacks add value to all corporate constituents — shareholders, employees, customers — when capital allocation follows two rules. One: buybacks are made with excess cash after the company has reinvested to maintain or grow the profitability of its current business, whether organically or through acquisitions. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a>: buybacks are made only at share prices below business value—a corporation that overpays for anything, including its own shares, destroys corporate value.</p><p><blockquote>当资本分配遵循两条规则时，股票回购会为所有公司组成部分（股东、员工、客户）增加价值。一：回购是在公司进行再投资以维持或提高当前业务的盈利能力后，用多余现金进行的，无论是有机的还是通过收购的。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">二</a>：回购只能以低于商业价值的股价进行——一家公司为任何东西（包括自己的股票）支付过高的价格都会破坏公司价值。</blockquote></p><p> Some critics protest buybacks for the wrong reasons. They complain of transferring corporate cash to shareholders when employees deserve a raise and customers a price cut.&nbsp; But this overlooks Rule One: skimping on employees and stiffing customers are anathema to any corporation and all its long-term shareholders, particularly stock pickers who construct a selective portfolio of high-quality stocks (called quality shareholders).</p><p><blockquote>一些批评者以错误的理由抗议回购。他们抱怨把公司现金转给股东，而员工理应加薪，客户理应降价。但这忽略了第一条规则：吝啬员工和压制客户是任何公司及其所有长期股东的诅咒，尤其是那些精心构建优质股票投资组合的选股者（称为优质股东）。</blockquote></p><p> There are only two types of potential beneficiaries of so diverting cash to share buybacks. The first are transient (short-term) shareholders who don’t care about Rule <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">Two</a>: they are happy to cash in at an inflated price even if in the process the company destroys value for remaining shareholders, employees and customers. The second are managers who don’t care about either Rule because their pay is tied heavily to current stock price or current earnings per share.</p><p><blockquote>这种将现金转移到股票回购的潜在受益者只有两种类型。首先是不在乎规则的短期股东<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">二</a>：他们乐于以虚高的价格兑现，即使在此过程中公司会破坏剩余股东、员工和客户的价值。第二种是不关心这两条规则的管理者，因为他们的薪酬与当前股价或当前每股收益密切相关。</blockquote></p><p> Faithful managerial stewards who adhere to buyback Rules One and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a>, however, add value for all corporate constituencies. Three of the best corporate managers of all time pioneered and perfected the proper execution of share buyback programs over several decades dating to the 1970s: Kay <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GHC\">Graham</a> of The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WASH\">Washington</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POST\">Post</a> Co., Larry Tisch of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/L\">Loews</a> Corporation, and Henry Singleton of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDY\">Teledyne</a>. All ran decades-long,&nbsp;on-and-off, buyback programs based on these principles — buying only when price was low and there were no better uses of cash.</p><p><blockquote>遵守回购规则一和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">二</a>然而，它为所有企业群体增加了价值。从 20 世纪 70 年代开始的几十年里，有史以来最优秀的三位公司经理开创并完善了股票回购计划的正确执行：凯<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GHC\">格雷厄姆</a>的<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WASH\">华盛顿</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/POST\">张贴</a>公司，拉里·蒂施<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/L\">勒斯</a>公司和亨利·辛格尔顿<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDY\">电信</a>所有这些公司都基于这些原则实施了长达数十年的断断续续的回购计划——只在价格低廉且没有更好的现金用途时才购买。</blockquote></p><p> These managerial titans have some clear successors among today’s corporate leaders. Among active corporate repurchasers in recent years, the following companies boast high-quality, long-term shareholder bases, as compared to transients, who own shares fleetingly, and indexers, who own indiscriminately.</p><p><blockquote>这些管理巨头在当今的企业领导者中都有一些明确的接班人。在近年来活跃的企业回购者中，以下公司拥有高质量的长期股东基础，而转瞬即逝地持有股票，指数持有者则不加区分地持有股票。</blockquote></p><p> AdobeADBE,+0.03%</p><p><blockquote>AdobeADBE，+0.03%</blockquote></p><p> AssurantAIZ,-1.67%</p><p><blockquote>保险，-1.67%</blockquote></p><p> Bank of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a> MellonBK,-2.30%</p><p><blockquote>银行<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">纽约</a>梅隆BK，-2.30%</blockquote></p><p> CDWCDW,-1.12%</p><p><blockquote>CDWCDW，-1.12%</blockquote></p><p> Deckers OutdoorDECK,-1.76%</p><p><blockquote>德克斯户外甲板，-1.76%</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBCP\">Home</a> DepotHD,-1.53%</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBCP\">家</a>存款，-1.53%</blockquote></p><p> O’Reilly AutomotiveORLY,-0.61%</p><p><blockquote>奥莱利汽车公司，-0.61%</blockquote></p><p> NVRNVR,-2.87%</p><p><blockquote>NVRNVR，-2.87%</blockquote></p><p> $Sherwin-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMB\">Williams</a>(SHW)$SHW,-1.56%</p><p><blockquote>$舍温-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMB\">威廉姆斯</a>(SHW)$SHW，-1.56%</blockquote></p><p> WalmartWMT,-0.09%</p><p><blockquote>沃尔玛WMT,-0.09%</blockquote></p><p> <b>O’Reilly</b>&nbsp;is an auto parts retailer serving both professional and amateur mechanics.&nbsp; Founded in 1957 by the O’Reilly family, the company runs some 5,600 stores generating annual revenue around $10 billion. Since its 1993 IPO, it has maintained a strong culture of employee stock ownership. The current CEO since 2018 is Greg <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00179\">Johnson</a>, who has been with the company since 2001.&nbsp;The business model is simple: buy new stores and increase sales at all stores. The result has been steady growth over two decades, with a major acquisition every two or three years and compound annual growth rate of 19%. The company offers products and services customers need and steadily adds new workers. Competitive advantages include economics of scale.</p><p><blockquote><b>奥莱利</b>是一家为专业和业余机械师提供服务的汽车零部件零售商。该公司由 O'Reilly 家族于 1957 年创立，拥有约 5600 家门店，年收入约为 100 亿美元。自1993年首次公开募股以来，该公司一直保持着浓厚的员工持股文化。自 2018 年以来的现任首席执行官是 Greg<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00179\">约翰逊</a>他从2001年开始就在公司工作。商业模式很简单：购买新店，增加所有门店的销售额。其结果是二十多年来稳步增长，每两三年就有一次重大收购，年复合增长率为19%。公司提供客户需要的产品和服务，并稳步增加新员工。竞争优势包括规模经济。</blockquote></p><p> Company strengths include capital allocation that emphasizes buybacks. After deploying capital to primary uses of reinvestment and acquisition, many companies adopt a combination of dividends and buybacks. Not O’Reilly, which skips the dividends and goes straight to disciplined and opportunistic buybacks: when price is well below value.&nbsp; The effect is to increase the price-earnings ratio when low and help stabilize it when high. Such an approach reflects prudent capital allocation, increases per share value to shareholders, and maintains a more rational stock price overall. O’Reilly has maintained this on-and-off buyback program since 2011. QSs include Akre Capital, Edge Point Investment Group and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T. Rowe Price</a>.</p><p><blockquote>公司的优势包括强调回购的资本配置。在将资本用于再投资和收购的主要用途后，许多公司采用股息和回购相结合的方式。而不是 O'Reilly，它跳过了股息，直接进行有纪律的机会主义回购：当价格远低于价值时。其效果是在市盈率较低时提高市盈率，在市盈率较高时帮助稳定市盈率。这种做法体现了审慎的资本分配，增加了股东的每股价值，并整体维持了较为理性的股价。O'Reilly 自 2011 年以来一直维持着这一断断续续的回购计划。QS 包括 Akre Capital、Edge Point Investment Group 和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T.罗·普莱斯</a>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>CDW</b>, a global leader in integrated IT solutions with annual revenue approaching $20 billion, traces its unlikely origins to a 1984 newspaper ad selling a used computer and printer. The company’s customer-centric business model positions itself as an extension of its customers’ IT staff to help access a vast selection of tech solutions. It presents itself to vendors as a partner facilitating access to a huge customer base. After ownership by private equity from 2007, it has been public since 2013, boasting steady growth in revenue and earnings with a strong runway for sustained growth, both organic and acquired. Competitive advantages include vast scale and scope and a performance driven-culture. The current CEO since 2018 is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01210\">Christine</a> A. Leahy, who has been with CDW since 2002.</p><p><blockquote><b>CDW</b>是集成IT解决方案的全球领导者，年收入接近200亿美元，其不太可能的起源可以追溯到1984年的一则出售二手电脑和打印机的报纸广告。公司以客户为中心的商业模式将自己定位为客户 IT 人员的延伸，以帮助客户获得大量的技术解决方案。它向供应商展示自己是一个促进接触庞大客户群的合作伙伴。自 2007 年起由私募股权持有后，该公司自 2013 年起上市，收入和盈利稳步增长，拥有强劲的持续增长跑道，无论是有机增长还是收购增长。竞争优势包括巨大的规模和范围以及绩效驱动的文化。自2018年起现任行政总裁为<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01210\">克里斯汀</a>A.Leahy，自2002年以来一直在CDW工作。</blockquote></p><p> The company adopts a classic approach to rational capital allocation: a clear statement of priorities, including reinvestment and acquisitions; a goal of steady annual dividend increases, and returning excess free cash flow through buybacks. The buyback program is clearly opportunistic and maps related pricing fluctuations from period to period. CDW boasts among the highest quality shareholder bases. QSs include Alliance Bernstein, Bessemer, Fenimore Asset Management, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZ\">Lazard</a>, Mawer Investment Management, Neuberger Berman, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T. Rowe Price</a>, Wedgewood Partners, and Wellington.</p><p><blockquote>该公司采用经典的合理资本配置方法：明确说明优先事项，包括再投资和收购；目标是每年稳定增加股息，并通过回购返还多余的自由现金流。回购计划显然是机会主义的，并绘制了不同时期相关的价格波动。CDW拥有最高质量的股东基础。QSs 包括 Alliance Bernstein、Bessemer、Fenimore Asset Management、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZ\">拉扎德</a>, Mawer 投资管理公司, Neuberger Berman,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T.罗·普莱斯</a>韦奇伍德合伙人和惠灵顿。</blockquote></p><p> <b>NVR</b>&nbsp;is a regional homebuilder and mortgage banker with annual revenues of about $6 billion. Founded in 1980 and public since 1993 after a recession-induced bankruptcy, brands include Ryan Homes, which caters to first-time home buyers, and NV Homes and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HTLD\">Heartland</a> Homes, which include higher-end properties. The business model avoids costly and risky land development projects in favor of building pre-sold homes on individual lots acquired from developers on terms that minimize builder risk. Along with such a conservative strategy, NVR’s competitive advantages include relationships with developers and real estate professionals in the markets it&nbsp; serves.</p><p><blockquote><b>网络录像机</b>是一家地区性房屋建筑商和抵押贷款银行家，年收入约为 60 亿美元。该公司成立于 1980 年，自 1993 年因经济衰退破产后上市，旗下品牌包括为首次购房者提供服务的 Ryan Homes、NV Homes 和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HTLD\">中心地带</a>住宅，包括高端物业。这种商业模式避免了昂贵和高风险的土地开发项目，而是在从开发商收购的单个地块上建造预售房屋，以最大限度地降低建筑商风险。除了这种保守的战略，NVR 的竞争优势还包括与其服务市场中的开发商和房地产专业人士的关系。</blockquote></p><p> The current CEO is Paul Seville, in the role since 2005, making him <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the&nbsp;more seasoned of today’s top executives.&nbsp;NVR has long boasted the highest listed stock price other than <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK.A\">Berkshire Hathaway</a>. NVR’s stock repurchase program dates to 1994 and is known to be among the most consistent and dedicated program of its kind. Current QSs include Broad Run, Capital Group, Diamond <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIL\">Hill</a> Capital, Ensemble Capital, Giverny Capital, Smead Capital, Wellington and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T. Rowe Price</a>.</p><p><blockquote>现任首席执行官是 Paul Seville，自 2005 年起担任该职位，使他<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">一</a>当今最有经验的高管之一。长期以来，NVR 的上市股价一直是除<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK.A\">伯克希尔哈撒韦公司</a>. NVR 的股票回购计划可以追溯到 1994 年，是同类计划中最稳定、最专注的计划之一。目前的 QSs 包括 Broad Run、Capital Group、Diamond<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIL\">山丘</a>资本、Ensemble Capital、Giverny Capital、Smead Capital、惠灵顿和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TROW\">T.罗·普莱斯</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Share buybacks are only controversial because they can be misused. Done right, they are wins all around.&nbsp; Fortunately, Corporate America continues to have some great managers who understand this, and many quality shareholders who appreciate them for it.</p><p><blockquote>股票回购之所以有争议，只是因为它们可能会被滥用。如果做得好，他们是全方位的胜利。幸运的是，美国企业界仍然有一些理解这一点的优秀管理者，以及许多欣赏他们的优质股东。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-companies-that-know-how-to-spend-money-so-you-have-a-chance-to-make-some-11625766546?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-companies-that-know-how-to-spend-money-so-you-have-a-chance-to-make-some-11625766546?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1135632463","content_text":"Share buybacks can add value to all corporate constituents — shareholders, employees and customers\nShare buybacks are surprisingly controversial. A share buyback is when a company repurchases its own shares, which reduces its shares outstanding.  By reducing the number of shares, buybacks effectively allocate a greater portion of corporate capital to remaining investors. For example, earnings per share increases.\nShare buybacks add value to all corporate constituents — shareholders, employees, customers — when capital allocation follows two rules. One: buybacks are made with excess cash after the company has reinvested to maintain or grow the profitability of its current business, whether organically or through acquisitions. Two: buybacks are made only at share prices below business value—a corporation that overpays for anything, including its own shares, destroys corporate value.\nSome critics protest buybacks for the wrong reasons. They complain of transferring corporate cash to shareholders when employees deserve a raise and customers a price cut.  But this overlooks Rule One: skimping on employees and stiffing customers are anathema to any corporation and all its long-term shareholders, particularly stock pickers who construct a selective portfolio of high-quality stocks (called quality shareholders).\nThere are only two types of potential beneficiaries of so diverting cash to share buybacks. The first are transient (short-term) shareholders who don’t care about Rule Two: they are happy to cash in at an inflated price even if in the process the company destroys value for remaining shareholders, employees and customers. The second are managers who don’t care about either Rule because their pay is tied heavily to current stock price or current earnings per share.\nFaithful managerial stewards who adhere to buyback Rules One and Two, however, add value for all corporate constituencies. Three of the best corporate managers of all time pioneered and perfected the proper execution of share buyback programs over several decades dating to the 1970s: Kay Graham of The Washington Post Co., Larry Tisch of Loews Corporation, and Henry Singleton of Teledyne. All ran decades-long, on-and-off, buyback programs based on these principles — buying only when price was low and there were no better uses of cash.\nThese managerial titans have some clear successors among today’s corporate leaders. Among active corporate repurchasers in recent years, the following companies boast high-quality, long-term shareholder bases, as compared to transients, who own shares fleetingly, and indexers, who own indiscriminately.\nAdobeADBE,+0.03%\nAssurantAIZ,-1.67%\nBank of New York MellonBK,-2.30%\nCDWCDW,-1.12%\nDeckers OutdoorDECK,-1.76%\nHome DepotHD,-1.53%\nO’Reilly AutomotiveORLY,-0.61%\nNVRNVR,-2.87%\n$Sherwin-Williams(SHW)$SHW,-1.56%\nWalmartWMT,-0.09%\nO’Reilly is an auto parts retailer serving both professional and amateur mechanics.  Founded in 1957 by the O’Reilly family, the company runs some 5,600 stores generating annual revenue around $10 billion. Since its 1993 IPO, it has maintained a strong culture of employee stock ownership. The current CEO since 2018 is Greg Johnson, who has been with the company since 2001. The business model is simple: buy new stores and increase sales at all stores. The result has been steady growth over two decades, with a major acquisition every two or three years and compound annual growth rate of 19%. The company offers products and services customers need and steadily adds new workers. Competitive advantages include economics of scale.\nCompany strengths include capital allocation that emphasizes buybacks. After deploying capital to primary uses of reinvestment and acquisition, many companies adopt a combination of dividends and buybacks. Not O’Reilly, which skips the dividends and goes straight to disciplined and opportunistic buybacks: when price is well below value.  The effect is to increase the price-earnings ratio when low and help stabilize it when high. Such an approach reflects prudent capital allocation, increases per share value to shareholders, and maintains a more rational stock price overall. O’Reilly has maintained this on-and-off buyback program since 2011. QSs include Akre Capital, Edge Point Investment Group and T. Rowe Price.\nCDW, a global leader in integrated IT solutions with annual revenue approaching $20 billion, traces its unlikely origins to a 1984 newspaper ad selling a used computer and printer. The company’s customer-centric business model positions itself as an extension of its customers’ IT staff to help access a vast selection of tech solutions. It presents itself to vendors as a partner facilitating access to a huge customer base. After ownership by private equity from 2007, it has been public since 2013, boasting steady growth in revenue and earnings with a strong runway for sustained growth, both organic and acquired. Competitive advantages include vast scale and scope and a performance driven-culture. The current CEO since 2018 is Christine A. Leahy, who has been with CDW since 2002.\nThe company adopts a classic approach to rational capital allocation: a clear statement of priorities, including reinvestment and acquisitions; a goal of steady annual dividend increases, and returning excess free cash flow through buybacks. The buyback program is clearly opportunistic and maps related pricing fluctuations from period to period. CDW boasts among the highest quality shareholder bases. QSs include Alliance Bernstein, Bessemer, Fenimore Asset Management, Lazard, Mawer Investment Management, Neuberger Berman, T. Rowe Price, Wedgewood Partners, and Wellington.\nNVR is a regional homebuilder and mortgage banker with annual revenues of about $6 billion. Founded in 1980 and public since 1993 after a recession-induced bankruptcy, brands include Ryan Homes, which caters to first-time home buyers, and NV Homes and Heartland Homes, which include higher-end properties. The business model avoids costly and risky land development projects in favor of building pre-sold homes on individual lots acquired from developers on terms that minimize builder risk. Along with such a conservative strategy, NVR’s competitive advantages include relationships with developers and real estate professionals in the markets it  serves.\nThe current CEO is Paul Seville, in the role since 2005, making him one of the more seasoned of today’s top executives. NVR has long boasted the highest listed stock price other than Berkshire Hathaway. NVR’s stock repurchase program dates to 1994 and is known to be among the most consistent and dedicated program of its kind. Current QSs include Broad Run, Capital Group, Diamond Hill Capital, Ensemble Capital, Giverny Capital, Smead Capital, Wellington and T. Rowe Price.\nShare buybacks are only controversial because they can be misused. Done right, they are wins all around.  Fortunately, Corporate America continues to have some great managers who understand this, and many quality shareholders who appreciate them for it.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3066,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140077858,"gmtCreate":1625621659974,"gmtModify":1631891823683,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140077858","repostId":"1106187901","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2848,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154447633,"gmtCreate":1625541938922,"gmtModify":1631892906836,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/154447633","repostId":"1190430616","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":669,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155523840,"gmtCreate":1625445615080,"gmtModify":1631892906849,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/155523840","repostId":"1169840279","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":386,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152553999,"gmtCreate":1625316594711,"gmtModify":1631892906866,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/152553999","repostId":"1136694264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136694264","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1625293431,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1136694264?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-03 14:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并未气馁，反复抨击评级</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136694264","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment Holdin","content":"<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p><p><blockquote>周五上午，Iceberg Researchannouncedit 已在<b>AMC院线控股</b>AMC 4.08%。Iceberg 表示，由于 6 月份股票交易横盘，期权交易员已经亏损，而且该股周围的水泵看起来不稳定。</blockquote></p><p> The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息并没有阻止机构继续抛售 AMC 看涨期权合约，周五期权交易员买入了价值超过 259 万美元的合约。这些合约的到期日从今天到 12 月 17 日不等，一些交易员选择了高达 145 美元的执行价格。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 的股票从周五横盘交易形成的对称三角形中看跌突破，但守住了 47.91 美元的支撑位，并从该支撑位反弹。多头希望看到下跌继续被买入，并希望 AMC 以打印锤式烛台并收于 21 天指数移动平均线之上来结束这一天。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>当出现横扫订单时，表明交易者希望快速建仓，并预计股价即将出现大幅波动。扫货者为看涨期权或看跌期权支付市场价格，而不是出价，扫货者扫描多个交易所的订单簿，立即完成订单。</blockquote></p><p> These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p><p><blockquote>这类看涨期权期权订单通常由机构下达，散户投资者会发现留意扫货很有用，因为这表明 “聪明的资金 ”已经建仓。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p><p><blockquote><b>AMC 期权交易：</b>以下是 Benzinga Pro 提供的著名选项警报：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul>  <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li> </ul> <b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周五上午 9 点 42 分，一名交易员在 265 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 59 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 52,205 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.97 美元。</li><li>上午 9:51，一名交易员在 247 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.95美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 52 分，一名交易员在 248 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 260,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 10.50 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 356 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 311,500 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.75 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 266,600 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.60 美元。</li><li>上午 9:56，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.60美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 57 分，一名交易员在 300 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 28 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约23.40美元。</li><li>上午 9:58，一名交易员在 289 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了303,450美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约10.50美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 58 分，一名交易员在 580 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 55 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 278,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.80 美元。</li><li>上午 10:07，一名交易员在 258 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 80 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.52 美元。</li><li>上午 10:24，一名交易员在 352 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 50 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 54,560 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.55 美元。</li><li>上午 10:26，一名交易员在 234 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 7 月 23 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.31 美元。</li><li>上午 10:31，一名交易员在 224 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 9 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 105,280 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.70 美元。</li><li>上午 10:38，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 47 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 146,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 2.92 美元。</li><li>中午 12:02，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 45 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 305,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 6.10 美元。</li></ul><b>AMC价格走势：</b>截至发稿时，AMC院线股价下跌 5.3%，至 51.33 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并未气馁，反复抨击评级</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并未气馁，反复抨击评级</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-03 14:23</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p><p><blockquote>周五上午，Iceberg Researchannouncedit 已在<b>AMC院线控股</b>AMC 4.08%。Iceberg 表示，由于 6 月份股票交易横盘，期权交易员已经亏损，而且该股周围的水泵看起来不稳定。</blockquote></p><p> The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息并没有阻止机构继续抛售 AMC 看涨期权合约，周五期权交易员买入了价值超过 259 万美元的合约。这些合约的到期日从今天到 12 月 17 日不等，一些交易员选择了高达 145 美元的执行价格。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 的股票从周五横盘交易形成的对称三角形中看跌突破，但守住了 47.91 美元的支撑位，并从该支撑位反弹。多头希望看到下跌继续被买入，并希望 AMC 以打印锤式烛台并收于 21 天指数移动平均线之上来结束这一天。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>当出现横扫订单时，表明交易者希望快速建仓，并预计股价即将出现大幅波动。扫货者为看涨期权或看跌期权支付市场价格，而不是出价，扫货者扫描多个交易所的订单簿，立即完成订单。</blockquote></p><p> These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p><p><blockquote>这类看涨期权期权订单通常由机构下达，散户投资者会发现留意扫货很有用，因为这表明 “聪明的资金 ”已经建仓。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p><p><blockquote><b>AMC 期权交易：</b>以下是 Benzinga Pro 提供的著名选项警报：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul>  <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li> </ul> <b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周五上午 9 点 42 分，一名交易员在 265 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 59 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 52,205 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.97 美元。</li><li>上午 9:51，一名交易员在 247 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.95美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 52 分，一名交易员在 248 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 260,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 10.50 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 356 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 311,500 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.75 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 266,600 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.60 美元。</li><li>上午 9:56，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.60美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 57 分，一名交易员在 300 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 28 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约23.40美元。</li><li>上午 9:58，一名交易员在 289 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了303,450美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约10.50美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 58 分，一名交易员在 580 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 55 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 278,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.80 美元。</li><li>上午 10:07，一名交易员在 258 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 80 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.52 美元。</li><li>上午 10:24，一名交易员在 352 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 50 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 54,560 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.55 美元。</li><li>上午 10:26，一名交易员在 234 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 7 月 23 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.31 美元。</li><li>上午 10:31，一名交易员在 224 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 9 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 105,280 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.70 美元。</li><li>上午 10:38，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 47 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 146,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 2.92 美元。</li><li>中午 12:02，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 45 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 305,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 6.10 美元。</li></ul><b>AMC价格走势：</b>截至发稿时，AMC院线股价下跌 5.3%，至 51.33 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136694264","content_text":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.\nThe news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.\nAMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.\nWhy It’s Important:When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.\nThese types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.\nThe AMC Option Trades:Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:\n\nAt 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.\nAt 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.\nAt 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.\nAt 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.\nAt 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.\nAt 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.\nAt 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.\nAt 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.\nAt 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.\n\nAMC Price Action:Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":645,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":156159654,"gmtCreate":1625204451478,"gmtModify":1631892906875,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/156159654","repostId":"1133090424","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":537,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159331493,"gmtCreate":1624940429012,"gmtModify":1631892906886,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/159331493","repostId":"1113711731","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113711731","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624937958,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1113711731?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-29 11:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO Stock Is Going Nuts. This Is the Best Explanation.<blockquote>蔚来股票正在疯狂。这是最好的解释。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113711731","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stock in Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO is on fire. While a surge in the volume of options tradi","content":"<p>Stock in Chinese electric vehicle maker&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;is&nbsp;on fire. While a surge in the volume of options trading isn’t a perfect explanation for the rally, it certainlyhelped shares soaron Monday.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商蔚来的股票着火了。虽然期权交易量的激增并不能完美解释股价上涨，但它确实帮助股市在周一飙升。</blockquote></p><p> NIO (ticker: NIO) stock gained almost 10% Monday and shares are up 28% over the past month. The&nbsp;S&amp;P 500,for comparison, rose 0.2% Monday and is up 2% over the past month. Call options volume, which rose almost 200% on Monday compared to Friday, is perhaps the biggest reason NIO shares might be more volatile.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来（股票代码：蔚来）股价周一上涨近 10%，过去一个月股价上涨 28%。相比之下，标准普尔 500 指数周一上涨 0.2%，过去一个月上涨 2%。与周五相比，周一看涨期权期权交易量增长了近 200%，这可能是蔚来股票波动更大的最大原因。</blockquote></p><p> Call options give the holder the right to buy a stock at a fixed price. (Buying a call is a bullish take on the underlying stock.) Brokers will sell and trade options contracts because they want to earn a commission on a trade. But brokers don’t want to be short a call option, which means they’ll have to take a loss if the stock rises.</p><p><blockquote>看涨期权期权赋予持有人以固定价格购买股票的权利。（购买看涨期权是对标的股票的看涨。）经纪人会出售和交易期权合约，因为他们想从交易中赚取佣金。但经纪商不想做空看涨期权期权，这意味着如果股价上涨，他们将不得不承担损失。</blockquote></p><p> One way brokers can hedge options positions is to buy the underlying stock. If a broker sells a call and buys the stock, they can earn the options commission and, if the stock rises, they can deliver the stock purchased to the call holder. In that scenario, the broker doesn’t have to buy shares at a higher price. That process is one way higher-than-average call buying can drive buying in the underlying stock.</p><p><blockquote>经纪商对冲期权头寸的一种方法是购买标的股票。如果经纪人出售看涨期权并购买股票，他们可以赚取期权佣金，如果股票上涨，他们可以将购买的股票交付给看涨期权持有人。在这种情况下，经纪人不必以更高的价格购买股票。这一过程是高于平均水平的看涨期权买入量推动标的股票买入量的一种方式。</blockquote></p><p> Other factors don’t seem to be at play. Wall Street, for example, can’t be credited with the rally. The average analystprice targetfor NIO stock is up about 1% over the past month and not much has happened to those targets since the companyreported earningsat the end of April. Looking back to that point, the average analyst price target has gone up about $1 to a little more than $59 a share.</p><p><blockquote>其他因素似乎没有起作用。例如，华尔街的反弹功不可没。过去一个月，分析师对蔚来股票的平均目标价上涨了约 1%，自该公司 4 月底公布收益以来，这些目标并没有发生太大变化。回顾过去，分析师的平均目标价已上涨约 1 美元，至每股 59 美元多一点。</blockquote></p><p> News doesn’t seem to be a credible reason for NIO’s rally, either. The last release on NIO’s website is fromJune 1when the company reported May deliveries. Those numbers relieved investors because the electric vehicle company maintained second-quarter delivery guidance despite a global automotive semiconductor shortage that has roiled the entire industry.</p><p><blockquote>新闻似乎也不是蔚来反弹的可信理由。蔚来网站上的最后一次发布是在 6 月 1 日，当时该公司报告称将于 5 月交付。这些数字让投资者松了一口气，因为尽管全球汽车半导体短缺扰乱了整个行业，但这家电动汽车公司仍维持了第二季度的交付指引。</blockquote></p><p> NIO shares are now up 1% year to date. It’s been a wild ride so far in 2021. Based on recent trading, the ride will continue.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来股价今年迄今已上涨 1%。2021 年到目前为止，这是一段疯狂的旅程。根据最近的交易情况，这一趋势将继续下去。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO Stock Is Going Nuts. This Is the Best Explanation.<blockquote>蔚来股票正在疯狂。这是最好的解释。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO Stock Is Going Nuts. This Is the Best Explanation.<blockquote>蔚来股票正在疯狂。这是最好的解释。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-29 11:39</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stock in Chinese electric vehicle maker&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;is&nbsp;on fire. While a surge in the volume of options trading isn’t a perfect explanation for the rally, it certainlyhelped shares soaron Monday.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商蔚来的股票着火了。虽然期权交易量的激增并不能完美解释股价上涨，但它确实帮助股市在周一飙升。</blockquote></p><p> NIO (ticker: NIO) stock gained almost 10% Monday and shares are up 28% over the past month. The&nbsp;S&amp;P 500,for comparison, rose 0.2% Monday and is up 2% over the past month. Call options volume, which rose almost 200% on Monday compared to Friday, is perhaps the biggest reason NIO shares might be more volatile.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来（股票代码：蔚来）股价周一上涨近 10%，过去一个月股价上涨 28%。相比之下，标准普尔 500 指数周一上涨 0.2%，过去一个月上涨 2%。与周五相比，周一看涨期权期权交易量增长了近 200%，这可能是蔚来股票波动更大的最大原因。</blockquote></p><p> Call options give the holder the right to buy a stock at a fixed price. (Buying a call is a bullish take on the underlying stock.) Brokers will sell and trade options contracts because they want to earn a commission on a trade. But brokers don’t want to be short a call option, which means they’ll have to take a loss if the stock rises.</p><p><blockquote>看涨期权期权赋予持有人以固定价格购买股票的权利。（购买看涨期权是对标的股票的看涨。）经纪人会出售和交易期权合约，因为他们想从交易中赚取佣金。但经纪商不想做空看涨期权期权，这意味着如果股价上涨，他们将不得不承担损失。</blockquote></p><p> One way brokers can hedge options positions is to buy the underlying stock. If a broker sells a call and buys the stock, they can earn the options commission and, if the stock rises, they can deliver the stock purchased to the call holder. In that scenario, the broker doesn’t have to buy shares at a higher price. That process is one way higher-than-average call buying can drive buying in the underlying stock.</p><p><blockquote>经纪商对冲期权头寸的一种方法是购买标的股票。如果经纪人出售看涨期权并购买股票，他们可以赚取期权佣金，如果股票上涨，他们可以将购买的股票交付给看涨期权持有人。在这种情况下，经纪人不必以更高的价格购买股票。这一过程是高于平均水平的看涨期权买入量推动标的股票买入量的一种方式。</blockquote></p><p> Other factors don’t seem to be at play. Wall Street, for example, can’t be credited with the rally. The average analystprice targetfor NIO stock is up about 1% over the past month and not much has happened to those targets since the companyreported earningsat the end of April. Looking back to that point, the average analyst price target has gone up about $1 to a little more than $59 a share.</p><p><blockquote>其他因素似乎没有起作用。例如，华尔街的反弹功不可没。过去一个月，分析师对蔚来股票的平均目标价上涨了约 1%，自该公司 4 月底公布收益以来，这些目标并没有发生太大变化。回顾过去，分析师的平均目标价已上涨约 1 美元，至每股 59 美元多一点。</blockquote></p><p> News doesn’t seem to be a credible reason for NIO’s rally, either. The last release on NIO’s website is fromJune 1when the company reported May deliveries. Those numbers relieved investors because the electric vehicle company maintained second-quarter delivery guidance despite a global automotive semiconductor shortage that has roiled the entire industry.</p><p><blockquote>新闻似乎也不是蔚来反弹的可信理由。蔚来网站上的最后一次发布是在 6 月 1 日，当时该公司报告称将于 5 月交付。这些数字让投资者松了一口气，因为尽管全球汽车半导体短缺扰乱了整个行业，但这家电动汽车公司仍维持了第二季度的交付指引。</blockquote></p><p> NIO shares are now up 1% year to date. It’s been a wild ride so far in 2021. Based on recent trading, the ride will continue.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来股价今年迄今已上涨 1%。2021 年到目前为止，这是一段疯狂的旅程。根据最近的交易情况，这一趋势将继续下去。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/nio-stock-options-volume-51624921009?siteid=yhoof2\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/nio-stock-options-volume-51624921009?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113711731","content_text":"Stock in Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO is on fire. While a surge in the volume of options trading isn’t a perfect explanation for the rally, it certainlyhelped shares soaron Monday.\nNIO (ticker: NIO) stock gained almost 10% Monday and shares are up 28% over the past month. The S&P 500,for comparison, rose 0.2% Monday and is up 2% over the past month. Call options volume, which rose almost 200% on Monday compared to Friday, is perhaps the biggest reason NIO shares might be more volatile.\nCall options give the holder the right to buy a stock at a fixed price. (Buying a call is a bullish take on the underlying stock.) Brokers will sell and trade options contracts because they want to earn a commission on a trade. But brokers don’t want to be short a call option, which means they’ll have to take a loss if the stock rises.\nOne way brokers can hedge options positions is to buy the underlying stock. If a broker sells a call and buys the stock, they can earn the options commission and, if the stock rises, they can deliver the stock purchased to the call holder. In that scenario, the broker doesn’t have to buy shares at a higher price. That process is one way higher-than-average call buying can drive buying in the underlying stock.\nOther factors don’t seem to be at play. Wall Street, for example, can’t be credited with the rally. The average analystprice targetfor NIO stock is up about 1% over the past month and not much has happened to those targets since the companyreported earningsat the end of April. Looking back to that point, the average analyst price target has gone up about $1 to a little more than $59 a share.\nNews doesn’t seem to be a credible reason for NIO’s rally, either. The last release on NIO’s website is fromJune 1when the company reported May deliveries. Those numbers relieved investors because the electric vehicle company maintained second-quarter delivery guidance despite a global automotive semiconductor shortage that has roiled the entire industry.\nNIO shares are now up 1% year to date. It’s been a wild ride so far in 2021. Based on recent trading, the ride will continue.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":593,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127823791,"gmtCreate":1624843736313,"gmtModify":1631892906897,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/127823791","repostId":"1106788377","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":451,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":124845931,"gmtCreate":1624759988923,"gmtModify":1631892906908,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nio[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"Nio[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"Nio[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/124845931","repostId":"1137119316","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137119316","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624754401,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1137119316?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-27 08:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Ford Or NIO? The Final Verdict<blockquote>福特还是蔚来？最终判决</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137119316","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"I am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.The comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.NIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.With Ford  launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO  will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>I am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.</li>  <li>The comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.</li>  <li>NIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5033fa117d7852799244b8275bc1000f\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"886\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>我在不同的类别中比较福特和蔚来。</li><li>此次比较旨在增进对福特和蔚来增长潜力的了解，同时突出市场地位和机遇的差异。</li><li>蔚来的增长速度比福特快得多，高估值可能是合理的。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> With Ford (F) launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO (NIO) will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based on market opportunity, scale, revenue model, growth prospects and valuation? I will compare Ford against NIO in each category and issue a final verdict at the end.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特公司（F）在电动汽车市场发起重大攻势，中国电动汽车制造商蔚来（蔚来）未来将面临另一个竞争对手争夺销量。根据市场机会、规模、收入模式、增长前景和估值，哪家汽车制造商提供了最好的交易？我将在每个类别中比较福特和蔚来，并在最后给出最终结论。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ford vs. NIO: The battle for the global electric vehicle market is heating up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>福特与蔚来：全球电动汽车市场之争正在升温</b></blockquote></p><p> Although there is a world of difference between Ford and NIO, both companies are set to go toe-to-toe in the rapidly growing global electric vehicle market. Ford’s fleet is not yet EV-focused but this is going to change: Feeling that the EV race is heating up, Ford said it is accelerating its electrification plan by investing&nbsp;$30B into its EV manufacturing capabilities until 2025. Ford’s previous capital plan called for a $22B investment in zero-emission vehicles. Ford also set an ambitious sales goal: 40% of its global sales will be electric within the next decade and 33% of pickup truck sales. Electric vehicle sales account for just 1% of Ford's sales today. As Ford is phasing out combustion engines, it is set to evolve into an all-electric vehicle maker by 2040.</p><p><blockquote>尽管福特和蔚来之间存在天壤之别，但两家公司都将在快速增长的全球电动汽车市场展开较量。福特的车队还没有以电动汽车为重点，但这种情况将会改变： 福特感觉到电动汽车竞赛正在升温，因此表示将加快其电气化计划，在 2025 年前投资 300 亿美元用于电动汽车制造能力。福特之前的资本计划要求投资 220 亿美元用于零排放汽车。福特还设定了一个雄心勃勃的销售目标：未来十年，其全球销量的 40% 将是电动汽车，皮卡车销量的 33% 将是电动汽车。目前，电动汽车销量仅占福特销量的 1%。随着福特逐步淘汰内燃机，它将在 2040 年发展成为一家全电动汽车制造商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Market opportunity</b></p><p><blockquote><b>市场机会</b></blockquote></p><p> In 2020, 3.2m electric vehicles were sold in the world which represented a small market share of just 4.2%. China, however, was responsible for buying 41% of all electric vehicles in the world in 2020. Chinese buyers purchased 1.3m electric vehicles last year and sales are set to grow fast as Beijing seeks to boost EV adoption. The second largest market for electric vehicles was Europe which accounted for 42% of global EV sales. The US is only the third-largest market for plug-in electric vehicles in the world.</p><p><blockquote>2020年，全球电动汽车销量为320万辆，市场份额仅为4.2%。然而，2020 年，中国购买了全球 41% 的电动汽车。去年，中国买家购买了 130 万辆电动汽车，随着北京寻求促进电动汽车的普及，销量将快速增长。电动汽车的第二大市场是欧洲，占全球电动汽车销量的42%。美国只是全球第三大插电式电动汽车市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b48c23b32134542f51227d9b1b612887\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"863\"><span>(Source: Wikipedia)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：维基百科）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> China, by far, is the fastest growing EV market in the world, although Europe is catching up fast, in part due to a legislative efforts to increase adoption of zero-emission passenger vehicles and because of massive investments in a Europe-wide charging station network. NIO is&nbsp;on the cusp of entering the European market&nbsp;in a bid to grow market share in the world’s second-largest EV market before the competition is ready.</p><p><blockquote>到目前为止，中国是世界上增长最快的电动汽车市场，尽管欧洲正在迅速迎头赶上，部分原因是立法努力增加零排放乘用车的采用，以及对欧洲范围内充电站网络的大量投资。蔚来正处于进军欧洲市场的风口浪尖，希望在竞争准备就绪之前扩大其在世界第二大电动汽车市场的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> Beijing is a driver behind the electrification of the Chinese auto industry: The government wants to see a&nbsp;twenty percent share&nbsp;of electric vehicles for new car sales by 2025 which will drive EV penetration in NIO’s home market.</p><p><blockquote>中国政府是蔚来汽车工业电气化的推动者： 中国政府希望到 2025 年，电动汽车在新车销售中所占份额达到 20%，这将推动电动汽车在中国本土市场的普及。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9871e44eaf69adb27151425887870ace\" tg-width=\"739\" tg-height=\"454\"><span>(Source:Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Turning to growth projections.</p><p><blockquote>转向增长预测。</blockquote></p><p> With more favorable government policies for EV makers in places like China and Europe, these markets are poised to see the fastest sales growth and the highest EV adoption rates in the world. China is not only the largest market due to population size but is also expected to outperform all other markets in the world in EV sales until 2030.</p><p><blockquote>随着中国和欧洲等地政府对电动汽车制造商采取更有利的政策，这些市场将迎来世界上最快的销售增长和最高的电动汽车采用率。由于人口规模，中国不仅是最大的市场，而且预计到2030年，电动汽车销量将超过全球所有其他市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/61d19dff2f34e2d8828aca854e85d84a\" tg-width=\"825\" tg-height=\"565\"><span>(Source:McKinsey)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：麦肯锡）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Since China has a larger total market size, a higher EV adoption rate, stronger expected sales growth and a more favorable regulatory framework, the winner here would be: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>由于中国拥有更大的总市场规模、更高的电动汽车采用率、更强劲的预期销售增长和更有利的监管框架，这里的赢家将是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Scale and manufacturing competence</b></p><p><blockquote><b>规模和制造能力</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford has a century’s worth of manufacturing experience. But Ford, so far, has only one all-electric vehicle in its product line-up that compares to NIO: The Mustang Mach-E SUV. In 2022, Ford will begin to sell the all-electric F-150 Lightening which builds on the success of Ford’s best-selling pick-up truck. NIO already has a stronger product catalog including the 5-seater ES6 SUV, the 5-seater coupe SUV EC6 and the ES8, a 6-seater and 7-seater full-sized SUV.</p><p><blockquote>福特拥有百年的制造经验。但到目前为止，福特的产品阵容中只有一款与蔚来相比的全电动汽车：野马 Mach-E SUV。2022 年，福特将开始销售全电动 F-150 Lightening，该车建立在福特最畅销皮卡车的成功基础上。蔚来已经拥有更强大的产品目录，包括5座ES6 SUV、5座轿跑车SUV EC6以及6座和7座全尺寸SUV ES8。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Since NIO is solely focused on producing EVs and occupies a very small and defined niche, the Chinese firm has an advantage as far as EV-manufacturing expertise goes. The question is how long this advantage can last. Ford has extensive experience in building cars and can leverage a global manufacturing base to ramp up EV production faster than any niche EV maker could ever hope to achieve. This makes Ford a very serious rival not only to Tesla (TSLA) in the US, but also to NIO abroad. Ford is accelerating its electrification plans and it has the resources and the ambition to become a leader in EVs within the next decade. Ford’s proposed $30B spending on the electrification of its fleet will accelerate its transformation and turn Ford into a long term threat to other EV makers.</p><p><blockquote>由于蔚来只专注于生产电动汽车，并且占据了一个非常小且明确的利基市场，这家中国公司在电动汽车制造专业知识方面具有优势。问题是这种优势能持续多久。福特在制造汽车方面拥有丰富的经验，可以利用全球制造基地以比任何利基电动汽车制造商希望实现的速度更快地提高电动汽车产量。这使得福特不仅在美国是特斯拉（TSLA）的有力竞争对手，而且在国外也是蔚来的有力竞争对手。福特正在加速其电气化计划，它有资源和雄心在未来十年内成为电动汽车的领导者。福特提议斥资 300 亿美元用于车队电气化，这将加速其转型，并使福特成为其他电动汽车制造商的长期威胁。</blockquote></p><p> Winner here: Ford.</p><p><blockquote>这里的赢家：福特。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Differentiation and BaaS revenue model</b></p><p><blockquote><b>差异化与BaaS收入模式</b></blockquote></p><p> Both Ford and NIO know about the importance of differentiation in a market that will only get more competitive over time, which is why both companies are investing heavily in a related field that can break or solidify dominance in the EV market: Battery technology.</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来都知道差异化在这个市场中的重要性，随着时间的推移，这个市场只会变得更加竞争，这就是为什么两家公司都在一个相关领域大力投资，这个领域可以打破或巩固电动汽车市场的主导地位：电池技术。</blockquote></p><p> Ford is&nbsp;forming a joint venture&nbsp;with South Korean battery technology company SK Innovation to secure supply of traction battery cells and array modules. The joint venture is meant to accelerate battery deliveries and will produce approximately 60 GWh annually, enough to cover 25% of Ford’s estimated annual energy demand by 2030. NIO is also investing in battery technology and has&nbsp;formed its own joint venture&nbsp;to secure battery supply.</p><p><blockquote>福特正在与韩国电池技术公司 SK Innovation 成立一家合资企业，以确保牵引电池芯和阵列模块的供应。该合资企业旨在加快电池交付速度，年产量约为 60 GWh，足以满足福特到 2030 年预计年能源需求的 25%。蔚来也在投资电池技术，并组建了自己的合资企业来确保电池供应。</blockquote></p><p> The difference to Ford is that NIO’s battery investment strategy revolves around a battery subscription model, also called “battery-as-a-service”, which creates a strong, long term revenue opportunity for the Chinese vehicle maker. Under this “BaaS” model, users who buy a NIO electric vehicle get a 70,000 RMB initial discount, equivalent to $10,800, and can sign up for a monthly subscription to rent a rechargeable 70 kWh battery. Batteries can then be exchanged at one of NIO’s battery-swapping stations which can be found in most big Chinese cities. A battery subscription costs 980 RMB monthly which is the equivalent of $150.</p><p><blockquote>与福特不同的是，蔚来的电池投资战略围绕着电池订阅模式，也称为 “电池即服务 ”，这为这家中国汽车制造商创造了一个强大的长期收入机会。在这种 “BaaS” 模式下，用户购买蔚来电动汽车可获得 7 万元人民币的初始折扣，折合 1.08 万美元，并可签约包月租赁 70 千瓦时的可充电电池。然后可以在蔚来的换电站更换电池，这些换电站在中国大多数大城市都有。电池订阅费用为每月980元人民币，相当于150美元。</blockquote></p><p> The BaaS model has a couple of benefits for both the vehicle maker and the user: Purchasing an electric vehicle from NIO gets a lot more affordable due to the up-front discount and the subscription model ensures that users benefit from advancement in battery technology and better performance over time. Decoupling battery costs from vehicle prices creates an entirely new revenue stream on a subscription basis for NIO. Revenues from “BaaS” subscriptions could be used to increase the density of NIO’s network of charging/replacement stations. The battery subscription model also binds customers to NIO, potentially increasing customer lifetime value.</p><p><blockquote>BaaS模式对汽车制造商和用户都有几个好处：由于前期折扣，从蔚来购买电动汽车变得更加实惠，订阅模式确保用户受益于电池技术的进步和随着时间的推移更好的性能。将电池成本与汽车价格脱钩，为蔚来创造了一个全新的订阅收入流。“BaaS ”订阅的收入可用于增加蔚来充电/换电站网络的密度。电池订阅模式还将客户绑定到蔚来，从而潜在地增加客户的终身价值。</blockquote></p><p> Ford and NIO are primed to benefit from falling battery costs for electric vehicles as they ramp up capital allocations. As more investments flow into developing more efficient batteries, performance will go up and costs will go down which should drive EV adoption and benefit all EV makers. This is because lower battery prices make EVs more competitive to passenger vehicles with combustion engines. But since NIO is structuring a part of its business model explicitly around battery subscriptions, NIO could benefit more than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特和蔚来增加资本配置，它们有望从电动汽车电池成本下降中受益。随着越来越多的投资流入开发更高效的电池，性能将会提高，成本将会下降，这应该会推动电动汽车的采用并使所有电动汽车制造商受益。这是因为较低的电池价格使电动汽车比内燃机乘用车更具竞争力。但由于蔚来明确围绕电池订阅构建部分商业模式，蔚来可能会比福特受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> Battery costs for EVs have decreased 70% since 2014, based on information provided by investment firm Schroders, and are set to decrease more this decade.</p><p><blockquote>根据投资公司施罗德提供的信息，自 2014 年以来，电动汽车的电池成本已下降 70%，并且本十年还将进一步下降。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c42acb75905affe7570a2f399ea3192f\" tg-width=\"758\" tg-height=\"449\"><span>(Source: Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The “BaaS” model is genius and could develop into a $500M a year revenue opportunity for NIO long term. Although Ford is ramping up its investments in battery technology, the winner in this category is: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>“BaaS ”模式是天才之作，从长远来看，它可能会发展成为蔚来每年 5 亿美元的收入机会。尽管福特正在加大对电池技术的投资，但这一类别的赢家是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Sales growth and valuation</b></p><p><blockquote><b>销售增长和估值</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford’s sales in May grew 4.1% Y/Y but electrified vehicle sales (including hybrids) surged 184% Y/Y as Ford sold a record 10,364 EVs/hybrids in May. Escape electrified sales and Explorer Hybrid grew sales at 125% and 132% Y/Y showing strong customer uptake. NIO delivered 6,711 vehicles last month including 3,017 ES6s, 1,412 ES8s and 2,282 EC6s. Total Y/Y delivery growth for May was 95.3%.</p><p><blockquote>福特 5 月份的销量同比增长 4.1%，但电动汽车销量（包括混合动力汽车）同比激增 184%，福特 5 月份售出了创纪录的 10,364 辆电动汽车/混合动力汽车。Escape electrified 和 Explorer Hybrid 的销量分别同比增长 125% 和 132%，显示出强劲的客户吸引力。蔚来上个月交付了 6,711 辆汽车，其中包括 3,017 辆 ES6、1,412 辆 ES8 和 2,282 辆 EC6。5 月份总交付量同比增长 95.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Ford's sales are fifty-four times larger than NIO's which creates more sales growth and revaluation potential for NIO.</p><p><blockquote>福特的销量是蔚来汽车的54倍，这为蔚来创造了更多的销售增长和重估潜力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df5a0a393e44ed74241c5effcdd92350\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> The difference in valuation between Ford and NIO is like the difference between night and day. This is because Ford is still seen as a mature vehicle maker with expected enterprise sales growth in the low-to-mid digits, despite explosive growth in the EV category. Ford is expected to grow revenues by 33% until FY 2025 (base year: FY 2020) and NIO by 808%!</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来之间的估值差异就像黑夜和白天之间的差异。这是因为尽管电动汽车类别实现了爆炸式增长，但福特仍被视为一家成熟的汽车制造商，预计企业销量增长将达到中低位数。福特预计到 2025 财年（基准年：2020 财年）收入将增长 33%，蔚来将增长 808%!</blockquote></p><p> Due to these differences in sales growth, NIO is the complete opposite of Ford, at least as far as valuation goes. The Chinese EV-maker is expected to see sales and delivery growth close to 100% this year and since NIO is only dealing in EVs, NIO gets a much higher market-cap-to-sales ratio than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>由于销售增长的这些差异，蔚来与福特完全相反，至少就估值而言是这样。这家中国电动汽车制造商预计今年的销量和交付量将增长接近 100%，由于蔚来只销售电动汽车，蔚来的市值与销量之比远高于福特。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/817605c6b1e82c03d0473ea570d32b8f\" tg-width=\"506\" tg-height=\"406\"><span>(Source: Author)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：作者）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>NIO has larger risks...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来有更大的风险……</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is the more risky venture, but also the one that offers the most promise. Government policy favors EV-makers like NIO. The potential for total global sales growth is larger for NIO as it operates from a smaller revenue base compared to Ford. But there are also a few things that work against NIO. For example, recalls due to production defects would be a much bigger challenge for NIO to overcome than for Ford which can rely on a global service and distribution network. NIO’s valuation is also not without risk as an unexpected slowing of sales growth due to production setbacks would leave a much larger dent in the financials.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来是风险更大的企业，但也是最有希望的企业。政府政策有利于蔚来等电动汽车制造商。与福特相比，蔚来的全球总销售额增长潜力更大，因为它的营收基础较小。但也有一些事情对蔚来不利。例如，与可以依赖全球服务和分销网络的福特相比，由于生产缺陷导致的召回对于蔚来来说将是一个更大的挑战。蔚来的估值也并非没有风险，因为生产受挫导致销售增长意外放缓，将对财务状况造成更大影响。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final verdict</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最终判决</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is definitely the more “sexy” vehicle maker. Strong adoption and sales growth in China and Europe support NIO. Its super smart BaaS model which decouples vehicle purchase prices from battery costs is genius. You pay a high price for this growth but the market opportunity for NIO is immense.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来绝对是更 “性感 ”的汽车制造商。在中国和欧洲的强劲采用率和销售增长支持了蔚来。其超级智能BaaS模型将车辆购买价格与电池成本脱钩，堪称天才。你为这种增长付出了高昂的代价，但蔚来的市场机会是巨大的。</blockquote></p><p> Ford’s EV sales are booming and the percentage of EV sales will increase as the vehicle maker electrifies its fleet. Ford has a lot of potential in the EV market but since EV sales are still a relatively low percentage of total sales, it will take a long time for Ford to complete its transformation.</p><p><blockquote>福特的电动汽车销量正在蓬勃发展，随着该汽车制造商车队电气化，电动汽车销量的比例也将不断增加。福特在电动汽车市场潜力巨大，但由于电动汽车销量占总销量的比例仍然相对较低，福特需要很长时间才能完成转型。</blockquote></p><p> If you believe in the potential of the global EV market, buy NIO. If you believe in the potential of the global EV market and don’t like much risk, buy Ford.</p><p><blockquote>如果您相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，请购买蔚来。如果你相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，又不喜欢太大的风险，那就买福特吧。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ford Or NIO? The Final Verdict<blockquote>福特还是蔚来？最终判决</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFord Or NIO? The Final Verdict<blockquote>福特还是蔚来？最终判决</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-27 08:40</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>I am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.</li>  <li>The comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.</li>  <li>NIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5033fa117d7852799244b8275bc1000f\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"886\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>我在不同的类别中比较福特和蔚来。</li><li>此次比较旨在增进对福特和蔚来增长潜力的了解，同时突出市场地位和机遇的差异。</li><li>蔚来的增长速度比福特快得多，高估值可能是合理的。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> With Ford (F) launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO (NIO) will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based on market opportunity, scale, revenue model, growth prospects and valuation? I will compare Ford against NIO in each category and issue a final verdict at the end.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特公司（F）在电动汽车市场发起重大攻势，中国电动汽车制造商蔚来（蔚来）未来将面临另一个竞争对手争夺销量。根据市场机会、规模、收入模式、增长前景和估值，哪家汽车制造商提供了最好的交易？我将在每个类别中比较福特和蔚来，并在最后给出最终结论。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ford vs. NIO: The battle for the global electric vehicle market is heating up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>福特与蔚来：全球电动汽车市场之争正在升温</b></blockquote></p><p> Although there is a world of difference between Ford and NIO, both companies are set to go toe-to-toe in the rapidly growing global electric vehicle market. Ford’s fleet is not yet EV-focused but this is going to change: Feeling that the EV race is heating up, Ford said it is accelerating its electrification plan by investing&nbsp;$30B into its EV manufacturing capabilities until 2025. Ford’s previous capital plan called for a $22B investment in zero-emission vehicles. Ford also set an ambitious sales goal: 40% of its global sales will be electric within the next decade and 33% of pickup truck sales. Electric vehicle sales account for just 1% of Ford's sales today. As Ford is phasing out combustion engines, it is set to evolve into an all-electric vehicle maker by 2040.</p><p><blockquote>尽管福特和蔚来之间存在天壤之别，但两家公司都将在快速增长的全球电动汽车市场展开较量。福特的车队还没有以电动汽车为重点，但这种情况将会改变： 福特感觉到电动汽车竞赛正在升温，因此表示将加快其电气化计划，在 2025 年前投资 300 亿美元用于电动汽车制造能力。福特之前的资本计划要求投资 220 亿美元用于零排放汽车。福特还设定了一个雄心勃勃的销售目标：未来十年，其全球销量的 40% 将是电动汽车，皮卡车销量的 33% 将是电动汽车。目前，电动汽车销量仅占福特销量的 1%。随着福特逐步淘汰内燃机，它将在 2040 年发展成为一家全电动汽车制造商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Market opportunity</b></p><p><blockquote><b>市场机会</b></blockquote></p><p> In 2020, 3.2m electric vehicles were sold in the world which represented a small market share of just 4.2%. China, however, was responsible for buying 41% of all electric vehicles in the world in 2020. Chinese buyers purchased 1.3m electric vehicles last year and sales are set to grow fast as Beijing seeks to boost EV adoption. The second largest market for electric vehicles was Europe which accounted for 42% of global EV sales. The US is only the third-largest market for plug-in electric vehicles in the world.</p><p><blockquote>2020年，全球电动汽车销量为320万辆，市场份额仅为4.2%。然而，2020 年，中国购买了全球 41% 的电动汽车。去年，中国买家购买了 130 万辆电动汽车，随着北京寻求促进电动汽车的普及，销量将快速增长。电动汽车的第二大市场是欧洲，占全球电动汽车销量的42%。美国只是全球第三大插电式电动汽车市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b48c23b32134542f51227d9b1b612887\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"863\"><span>(Source: Wikipedia)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：维基百科）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> China, by far, is the fastest growing EV market in the world, although Europe is catching up fast, in part due to a legislative efforts to increase adoption of zero-emission passenger vehicles and because of massive investments in a Europe-wide charging station network. NIO is&nbsp;on the cusp of entering the European market&nbsp;in a bid to grow market share in the world’s second-largest EV market before the competition is ready.</p><p><blockquote>到目前为止，中国是世界上增长最快的电动汽车市场，尽管欧洲正在迅速迎头赶上，部分原因是立法努力增加零排放乘用车的采用，以及对欧洲范围内充电站网络的大量投资。蔚来正处于进军欧洲市场的风口浪尖，希望在竞争准备就绪之前扩大其在世界第二大电动汽车市场的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> Beijing is a driver behind the electrification of the Chinese auto industry: The government wants to see a&nbsp;twenty percent share&nbsp;of electric vehicles for new car sales by 2025 which will drive EV penetration in NIO’s home market.</p><p><blockquote>中国政府是蔚来汽车工业电气化的推动者： 中国政府希望到 2025 年，电动汽车在新车销售中所占份额达到 20%，这将推动电动汽车在中国本土市场的普及。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9871e44eaf69adb27151425887870ace\" tg-width=\"739\" tg-height=\"454\"><span>(Source:Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Turning to growth projections.</p><p><blockquote>转向增长预测。</blockquote></p><p> With more favorable government policies for EV makers in places like China and Europe, these markets are poised to see the fastest sales growth and the highest EV adoption rates in the world. China is not only the largest market due to population size but is also expected to outperform all other markets in the world in EV sales until 2030.</p><p><blockquote>随着中国和欧洲等地政府对电动汽车制造商采取更有利的政策，这些市场将迎来世界上最快的销售增长和最高的电动汽车采用率。由于人口规模，中国不仅是最大的市场，而且预计到2030年，电动汽车销量将超过全球所有其他市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/61d19dff2f34e2d8828aca854e85d84a\" tg-width=\"825\" tg-height=\"565\"><span>(Source:McKinsey)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：麦肯锡）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Since China has a larger total market size, a higher EV adoption rate, stronger expected sales growth and a more favorable regulatory framework, the winner here would be: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>由于中国拥有更大的总市场规模、更高的电动汽车采用率、更强劲的预期销售增长和更有利的监管框架，这里的赢家将是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Scale and manufacturing competence</b></p><p><blockquote><b>规模和制造能力</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford has a century’s worth of manufacturing experience. But Ford, so far, has only one all-electric vehicle in its product line-up that compares to NIO: The Mustang Mach-E SUV. In 2022, Ford will begin to sell the all-electric F-150 Lightening which builds on the success of Ford’s best-selling pick-up truck. NIO already has a stronger product catalog including the 5-seater ES6 SUV, the 5-seater coupe SUV EC6 and the ES8, a 6-seater and 7-seater full-sized SUV.</p><p><blockquote>福特拥有百年的制造经验。但到目前为止，福特的产品阵容中只有一款与蔚来相比的全电动汽车：野马 Mach-E SUV。2022 年，福特将开始销售全电动 F-150 Lightening，该车建立在福特最畅销皮卡车的成功基础上。蔚来已经拥有更强大的产品目录，包括5座ES6 SUV、5座轿跑车SUV EC6以及6座和7座全尺寸SUV ES8。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Since NIO is solely focused on producing EVs and occupies a very small and defined niche, the Chinese firm has an advantage as far as EV-manufacturing expertise goes. The question is how long this advantage can last. Ford has extensive experience in building cars and can leverage a global manufacturing base to ramp up EV production faster than any niche EV maker could ever hope to achieve. This makes Ford a very serious rival not only to Tesla (TSLA) in the US, but also to NIO abroad. Ford is accelerating its electrification plans and it has the resources and the ambition to become a leader in EVs within the next decade. Ford’s proposed $30B spending on the electrification of its fleet will accelerate its transformation and turn Ford into a long term threat to other EV makers.</p><p><blockquote>由于蔚来只专注于生产电动汽车，并且占据了一个非常小且明确的利基市场，这家中国公司在电动汽车制造专业知识方面具有优势。问题是这种优势能持续多久。福特在制造汽车方面拥有丰富的经验，可以利用全球制造基地以比任何利基电动汽车制造商希望实现的速度更快地提高电动汽车产量。这使得福特不仅在美国是特斯拉（TSLA）的有力竞争对手，而且在国外也是蔚来的有力竞争对手。福特正在加速其电气化计划，它有资源和雄心在未来十年内成为电动汽车的领导者。福特提议斥资 300 亿美元用于车队电气化，这将加速其转型，并使福特成为其他电动汽车制造商的长期威胁。</blockquote></p><p> Winner here: Ford.</p><p><blockquote>这里的赢家：福特。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Differentiation and BaaS revenue model</b></p><p><blockquote><b>差异化与BaaS收入模式</b></blockquote></p><p> Both Ford and NIO know about the importance of differentiation in a market that will only get more competitive over time, which is why both companies are investing heavily in a related field that can break or solidify dominance in the EV market: Battery technology.</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来都知道差异化在这个市场中的重要性，随着时间的推移，这个市场只会变得更加竞争，这就是为什么两家公司都在一个相关领域大力投资，这个领域可以打破或巩固电动汽车市场的主导地位：电池技术。</blockquote></p><p> Ford is&nbsp;forming a joint venture&nbsp;with South Korean battery technology company SK Innovation to secure supply of traction battery cells and array modules. The joint venture is meant to accelerate battery deliveries and will produce approximately 60 GWh annually, enough to cover 25% of Ford’s estimated annual energy demand by 2030. NIO is also investing in battery technology and has&nbsp;formed its own joint venture&nbsp;to secure battery supply.</p><p><blockquote>福特正在与韩国电池技术公司 SK Innovation 成立一家合资企业，以确保牵引电池芯和阵列模块的供应。该合资企业旨在加快电池交付速度，年产量约为 60 GWh，足以满足福特到 2030 年预计年能源需求的 25%。蔚来也在投资电池技术，并组建了自己的合资企业来确保电池供应。</blockquote></p><p> The difference to Ford is that NIO’s battery investment strategy revolves around a battery subscription model, also called “battery-as-a-service”, which creates a strong, long term revenue opportunity for the Chinese vehicle maker. Under this “BaaS” model, users who buy a NIO electric vehicle get a 70,000 RMB initial discount, equivalent to $10,800, and can sign up for a monthly subscription to rent a rechargeable 70 kWh battery. Batteries can then be exchanged at one of NIO’s battery-swapping stations which can be found in most big Chinese cities. A battery subscription costs 980 RMB monthly which is the equivalent of $150.</p><p><blockquote>与福特不同的是，蔚来的电池投资战略围绕着电池订阅模式，也称为 “电池即服务 ”，这为这家中国汽车制造商创造了一个强大的长期收入机会。在这种 “BaaS” 模式下，用户购买蔚来电动汽车可获得 7 万元人民币的初始折扣，折合 1.08 万美元，并可签约包月租赁 70 千瓦时的可充电电池。然后可以在蔚来的换电站更换电池，这些换电站在中国大多数大城市都有。电池订阅费用为每月980元人民币，相当于150美元。</blockquote></p><p> The BaaS model has a couple of benefits for both the vehicle maker and the user: Purchasing an electric vehicle from NIO gets a lot more affordable due to the up-front discount and the subscription model ensures that users benefit from advancement in battery technology and better performance over time. Decoupling battery costs from vehicle prices creates an entirely new revenue stream on a subscription basis for NIO. Revenues from “BaaS” subscriptions could be used to increase the density of NIO’s network of charging/replacement stations. The battery subscription model also binds customers to NIO, potentially increasing customer lifetime value.</p><p><blockquote>BaaS模式对汽车制造商和用户都有几个好处：由于前期折扣，从蔚来购买电动汽车变得更加实惠，订阅模式确保用户受益于电池技术的进步和随着时间的推移更好的性能。将电池成本与汽车价格脱钩，为蔚来创造了一个全新的订阅收入流。“BaaS ”订阅的收入可用于增加蔚来充电/换电站网络的密度。电池订阅模式还将客户绑定到蔚来，从而潜在地增加客户的终身价值。</blockquote></p><p> Ford and NIO are primed to benefit from falling battery costs for electric vehicles as they ramp up capital allocations. As more investments flow into developing more efficient batteries, performance will go up and costs will go down which should drive EV adoption and benefit all EV makers. This is because lower battery prices make EVs more competitive to passenger vehicles with combustion engines. But since NIO is structuring a part of its business model explicitly around battery subscriptions, NIO could benefit more than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特和蔚来增加资本配置，它们有望从电动汽车电池成本下降中受益。随着越来越多的投资流入开发更高效的电池，性能将会提高，成本将会下降，这应该会推动电动汽车的采用并使所有电动汽车制造商受益。这是因为较低的电池价格使电动汽车比内燃机乘用车更具竞争力。但由于蔚来明确围绕电池订阅构建部分商业模式，蔚来可能会比福特受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> Battery costs for EVs have decreased 70% since 2014, based on information provided by investment firm Schroders, and are set to decrease more this decade.</p><p><blockquote>根据投资公司施罗德提供的信息，自 2014 年以来，电动汽车的电池成本已下降 70%，并且本十年还将进一步下降。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c42acb75905affe7570a2f399ea3192f\" tg-width=\"758\" tg-height=\"449\"><span>(Source: Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The “BaaS” model is genius and could develop into a $500M a year revenue opportunity for NIO long term. Although Ford is ramping up its investments in battery technology, the winner in this category is: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>“BaaS ”模式是天才之作，从长远来看，它可能会发展成为蔚来每年 5 亿美元的收入机会。尽管福特正在加大对电池技术的投资，但这一类别的赢家是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Sales growth and valuation</b></p><p><blockquote><b>销售增长和估值</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford’s sales in May grew 4.1% Y/Y but electrified vehicle sales (including hybrids) surged 184% Y/Y as Ford sold a record 10,364 EVs/hybrids in May. Escape electrified sales and Explorer Hybrid grew sales at 125% and 132% Y/Y showing strong customer uptake. NIO delivered 6,711 vehicles last month including 3,017 ES6s, 1,412 ES8s and 2,282 EC6s. Total Y/Y delivery growth for May was 95.3%.</p><p><blockquote>福特 5 月份的销量同比增长 4.1%，但电动汽车销量（包括混合动力汽车）同比激增 184%，福特 5 月份售出了创纪录的 10,364 辆电动汽车/混合动力汽车。Escape electrified 和 Explorer Hybrid 的销量分别同比增长 125% 和 132%，显示出强劲的客户吸引力。蔚来上个月交付了 6,711 辆汽车，其中包括 3,017 辆 ES6、1,412 辆 ES8 和 2,282 辆 EC6。5 月份总交付量同比增长 95.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Ford's sales are fifty-four times larger than NIO's which creates more sales growth and revaluation potential for NIO.</p><p><blockquote>福特的销量是蔚来汽车的54倍，这为蔚来创造了更多的销售增长和重估潜力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df5a0a393e44ed74241c5effcdd92350\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> The difference in valuation between Ford and NIO is like the difference between night and day. This is because Ford is still seen as a mature vehicle maker with expected enterprise sales growth in the low-to-mid digits, despite explosive growth in the EV category. Ford is expected to grow revenues by 33% until FY 2025 (base year: FY 2020) and NIO by 808%!</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来之间的估值差异就像黑夜和白天之间的差异。这是因为尽管电动汽车类别实现了爆炸式增长，但福特仍被视为一家成熟的汽车制造商，预计企业销量增长将达到中低位数。福特预计到 2025 财年（基准年：2020 财年）收入将增长 33%，蔚来将增长 808%!</blockquote></p><p> Due to these differences in sales growth, NIO is the complete opposite of Ford, at least as far as valuation goes. The Chinese EV-maker is expected to see sales and delivery growth close to 100% this year and since NIO is only dealing in EVs, NIO gets a much higher market-cap-to-sales ratio than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>由于销售增长的这些差异，蔚来与福特完全相反，至少就估值而言是这样。这家中国电动汽车制造商预计今年的销量和交付量将增长接近 100%，由于蔚来只销售电动汽车，蔚来的市值与销量之比远高于福特。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/817605c6b1e82c03d0473ea570d32b8f\" tg-width=\"506\" tg-height=\"406\"><span>(Source: Author)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：作者）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>NIO has larger risks...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来有更大的风险……</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is the more risky venture, but also the one that offers the most promise. Government policy favors EV-makers like NIO. The potential for total global sales growth is larger for NIO as it operates from a smaller revenue base compared to Ford. But there are also a few things that work against NIO. For example, recalls due to production defects would be a much bigger challenge for NIO to overcome than for Ford which can rely on a global service and distribution network. NIO’s valuation is also not without risk as an unexpected slowing of sales growth due to production setbacks would leave a much larger dent in the financials.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来是风险更大的企业，但也是最有希望的企业。政府政策有利于蔚来等电动汽车制造商。与福特相比，蔚来的全球总销售额增长潜力更大，因为它的营收基础较小。但也有一些事情对蔚来不利。例如，与可以依赖全球服务和分销网络的福特相比，由于生产缺陷导致的召回对于蔚来来说将是一个更大的挑战。蔚来的估值也并非没有风险，因为生产受挫导致销售增长意外放缓，将对财务状况造成更大影响。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final verdict</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最终判决</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is definitely the more “sexy” vehicle maker. Strong adoption and sales growth in China and Europe support NIO. Its super smart BaaS model which decouples vehicle purchase prices from battery costs is genius. You pay a high price for this growth but the market opportunity for NIO is immense.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来绝对是更 “性感 ”的汽车制造商。在中国和欧洲的强劲采用率和销售增长支持了蔚来。其超级智能BaaS模型将车辆购买价格与电池成本脱钩，堪称天才。你为这种增长付出了高昂的代价，但蔚来的市场机会是巨大的。</blockquote></p><p> Ford’s EV sales are booming and the percentage of EV sales will increase as the vehicle maker electrifies its fleet. Ford has a lot of potential in the EV market but since EV sales are still a relatively low percentage of total sales, it will take a long time for Ford to complete its transformation.</p><p><blockquote>福特的电动汽车销量正在蓬勃发展，随着该汽车制造商车队电气化，电动汽车销量的比例也将不断增加。福特在电动汽车市场潜力巨大，但由于电动汽车销量占总销量的比例仍然相对较低，福特需要很长时间才能完成转型。</blockquote></p><p> If you believe in the potential of the global EV market, buy NIO. If you believe in the potential of the global EV market and don’t like much risk, buy Ford.</p><p><blockquote>如果您相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，请购买蔚来。如果你相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，又不喜欢太大的风险，那就买福特吧。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4436600-ford-or-nio-the-final-verdict\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"F":"福特汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4436600-ford-or-nio-the-final-verdict","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137119316","content_text":"Summary\n\nI am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.\nThe comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.\nNIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.\n\npeterschreiber.media/iStock via Getty Images\nWith Ford (F) launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO (NIO) will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based on market opportunity, scale, revenue model, growth prospects and valuation? I will compare Ford against NIO in each category and issue a final verdict at the end.\nFord vs. NIO: The battle for the global electric vehicle market is heating up\nAlthough there is a world of difference between Ford and NIO, both companies are set to go toe-to-toe in the rapidly growing global electric vehicle market. Ford’s fleet is not yet EV-focused but this is going to change: Feeling that the EV race is heating up, Ford said it is accelerating its electrification plan by investing $30B into its EV manufacturing capabilities until 2025. Ford’s previous capital plan called for a $22B investment in zero-emission vehicles. Ford also set an ambitious sales goal: 40% of its global sales will be electric within the next decade and 33% of pickup truck sales. Electric vehicle sales account for just 1% of Ford's sales today. As Ford is phasing out combustion engines, it is set to evolve into an all-electric vehicle maker by 2040.\nMarket opportunity\nIn 2020, 3.2m electric vehicles were sold in the world which represented a small market share of just 4.2%. China, however, was responsible for buying 41% of all electric vehicles in the world in 2020. Chinese buyers purchased 1.3m electric vehicles last year and sales are set to grow fast as Beijing seeks to boost EV adoption. The second largest market for electric vehicles was Europe which accounted for 42% of global EV sales. The US is only the third-largest market for plug-in electric vehicles in the world.\n(Source: Wikipedia)\nChina, by far, is the fastest growing EV market in the world, although Europe is catching up fast, in part due to a legislative efforts to increase adoption of zero-emission passenger vehicles and because of massive investments in a Europe-wide charging station network. NIO is on the cusp of entering the European market in a bid to grow market share in the world’s second-largest EV market before the competition is ready.\nBeijing is a driver behind the electrification of the Chinese auto industry: The government wants to see a twenty percent share of electric vehicles for new car sales by 2025 which will drive EV penetration in NIO’s home market.\n(Source:Schroders)\nTurning to growth projections.\nWith more favorable government policies for EV makers in places like China and Europe, these markets are poised to see the fastest sales growth and the highest EV adoption rates in the world. China is not only the largest market due to population size but is also expected to outperform all other markets in the world in EV sales until 2030.\n(Source:McKinsey)\nSince China has a larger total market size, a higher EV adoption rate, stronger expected sales growth and a more favorable regulatory framework, the winner here would be: NIO.\nScale and manufacturing competence\nFord has a century’s worth of manufacturing experience. But Ford, so far, has only one all-electric vehicle in its product line-up that compares to NIO: The Mustang Mach-E SUV. In 2022, Ford will begin to sell the all-electric F-150 Lightening which builds on the success of Ford’s best-selling pick-up truck. NIO already has a stronger product catalog including the 5-seater ES6 SUV, the 5-seater coupe SUV EC6 and the ES8, a 6-seater and 7-seater full-sized SUV.\nSince NIO is solely focused on producing EVs and occupies a very small and defined niche, the Chinese firm has an advantage as far as EV-manufacturing expertise goes. The question is how long this advantage can last. Ford has extensive experience in building cars and can leverage a global manufacturing base to ramp up EV production faster than any niche EV maker could ever hope to achieve. This makes Ford a very serious rival not only to Tesla (TSLA) in the US, but also to NIO abroad. Ford is accelerating its electrification plans and it has the resources and the ambition to become a leader in EVs within the next decade. Ford’s proposed $30B spending on the electrification of its fleet will accelerate its transformation and turn Ford into a long term threat to other EV makers.\nWinner here: Ford.\nDifferentiation and BaaS revenue model\nBoth Ford and NIO know about the importance of differentiation in a market that will only get more competitive over time, which is why both companies are investing heavily in a related field that can break or solidify dominance in the EV market: Battery technology.\nFord is forming a joint venture with South Korean battery technology company SK Innovation to secure supply of traction battery cells and array modules. The joint venture is meant to accelerate battery deliveries and will produce approximately 60 GWh annually, enough to cover 25% of Ford’s estimated annual energy demand by 2030. NIO is also investing in battery technology and has formed its own joint venture to secure battery supply.\nThe difference to Ford is that NIO’s battery investment strategy revolves around a battery subscription model, also called “battery-as-a-service”, which creates a strong, long term revenue opportunity for the Chinese vehicle maker. Under this “BaaS” model, users who buy a NIO electric vehicle get a 70,000 RMB initial discount, equivalent to $10,800, and can sign up for a monthly subscription to rent a rechargeable 70 kWh battery. Batteries can then be exchanged at one of NIO’s battery-swapping stations which can be found in most big Chinese cities. A battery subscription costs 980 RMB monthly which is the equivalent of $150.\nThe BaaS model has a couple of benefits for both the vehicle maker and the user: Purchasing an electric vehicle from NIO gets a lot more affordable due to the up-front discount and the subscription model ensures that users benefit from advancement in battery technology and better performance over time. Decoupling battery costs from vehicle prices creates an entirely new revenue stream on a subscription basis for NIO. Revenues from “BaaS” subscriptions could be used to increase the density of NIO’s network of charging/replacement stations. The battery subscription model also binds customers to NIO, potentially increasing customer lifetime value.\nFord and NIO are primed to benefit from falling battery costs for electric vehicles as they ramp up capital allocations. As more investments flow into developing more efficient batteries, performance will go up and costs will go down which should drive EV adoption and benefit all EV makers. This is because lower battery prices make EVs more competitive to passenger vehicles with combustion engines. But since NIO is structuring a part of its business model explicitly around battery subscriptions, NIO could benefit more than Ford.\nBattery costs for EVs have decreased 70% since 2014, based on information provided by investment firm Schroders, and are set to decrease more this decade.\n(Source: Schroders)\nThe “BaaS” model is genius and could develop into a $500M a year revenue opportunity for NIO long term. Although Ford is ramping up its investments in battery technology, the winner in this category is: NIO.\nSales growth and valuation\nFord’s sales in May grew 4.1% Y/Y but electrified vehicle sales (including hybrids) surged 184% Y/Y as Ford sold a record 10,364 EVs/hybrids in May. Escape electrified sales and Explorer Hybrid grew sales at 125% and 132% Y/Y showing strong customer uptake. NIO delivered 6,711 vehicles last month including 3,017 ES6s, 1,412 ES8s and 2,282 EC6s. Total Y/Y delivery growth for May was 95.3%.\nFord's sales are fifty-four times larger than NIO's which creates more sales growth and revaluation potential for NIO.\nData by YCharts\nThe difference in valuation between Ford and NIO is like the difference between night and day. This is because Ford is still seen as a mature vehicle maker with expected enterprise sales growth in the low-to-mid digits, despite explosive growth in the EV category. Ford is expected to grow revenues by 33% until FY 2025 (base year: FY 2020) and NIO by 808%!\nDue to these differences in sales growth, NIO is the complete opposite of Ford, at least as far as valuation goes. The Chinese EV-maker is expected to see sales and delivery growth close to 100% this year and since NIO is only dealing in EVs, NIO gets a much higher market-cap-to-sales ratio than Ford.\n(Source: Author)\nNIO has larger risks...\nNIO is the more risky venture, but also the one that offers the most promise. Government policy favors EV-makers like NIO. The potential for total global sales growth is larger for NIO as it operates from a smaller revenue base compared to Ford. But there are also a few things that work against NIO. For example, recalls due to production defects would be a much bigger challenge for NIO to overcome than for Ford which can rely on a global service and distribution network. NIO’s valuation is also not without risk as an unexpected slowing of sales growth due to production setbacks would leave a much larger dent in the financials.\nFinal verdict\nNIO is definitely the more “sexy” vehicle maker. Strong adoption and sales growth in China and Europe support NIO. Its super smart BaaS model which decouples vehicle purchase prices from battery costs is genius. You pay a high price for this growth but the market opportunity for NIO is immense.\nFord’s EV sales are booming and the percentage of EV sales will increase as the vehicle maker electrifies its fleet. Ford has a lot of potential in the EV market but since EV sales are still a relatively low percentage of total sales, it will take a long time for Ford to complete its transformation.\nIf you believe in the potential of the global EV market, buy NIO. If you believe in the potential of the global EV market and don’t like much risk, buy Ford.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"F":0.9,"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":665,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125288782,"gmtCreate":1624675288646,"gmtModify":1631892906923,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125288782","repostId":"1100072036","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":460,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126568360,"gmtCreate":1624579086450,"gmtModify":1631892906934,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/126568360","repostId":"2146023477","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":687,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":128651570,"gmtCreate":1624515074990,"gmtModify":1631892906950,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128651570","repostId":"1187067912","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187067912","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624513711,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1187067912?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 13:48","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Keppel, Sembcorp Marine in talks for marine services deal, sources say<blockquote>消息人士称，吉宝和胜科海事正在就海事服务交易进行谈判</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187067912","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -Temasek-backed Singapore conglomerate Keppel Corp and Sembcorp Marine are set to begin ta","content":"<p>(Reuters) -Temasek-backed Singapore conglomerate Keppel Corp and Sembcorp Marine are set to begin talks to explore combining their ailing offshore and marine (O&amp;M) businesses, two sources familiar with the matter said on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社） - 两位知情人士周四表示，淡马锡支持的新加坡企业集团吉宝公司和胜科海事将开始谈判，探讨合并其陷入困境的近海和海事 (O&amp;M) 业务。</blockquote></p><p> A potential deal would bring together one of the world’s largest offshore oil rig builders with smaller rival Sembcorp after the businesses were whiplashed by years of oversupply in the sector, sustained weakness in oil prices and a drop in new orders.</p><p><blockquote>一项潜在的交易将使全球最大的海上石油钻井平台建造商之一与规模较小的竞争对手胜科公司（Sembcorp）走到一起，因为多年来该行业供应过剩、油价持续疲软和新订单下降使两家公司的业务受到重创。</blockquote></p><p> “Consolidation is needed simply because of competition, and the need for bigger working capital to take on new and bigger projects,” said Joel Ng at KGI Securities. Both companies own a network of shipyards in Singapore and overseas, including in Brazil, and employ thousands of workers.</p><p><blockquote>“凯基证券（KGI Securities）的 Joel Ng 说：”之所以需要整合，仅仅是因为竞争，以及需要更多的营运资金来承接新的、更大的项目。两家公司都在新加坡和海外（包括巴西）拥有造船厂网络，并雇佣了数千名工人。</blockquote></p><p> Trading in shares of Keppel and Sembcorp, which both count Singapore state investor Temasek Holdings as their largest shareholder, was halted on Thursday pending announcements.</p><p><blockquote>吉宝（Keppel）和胜科（Sembcorp）的股票交易周四暂停，等待公告，这两家公司的最大股东都是新加坡国家投资者淡马锡控股（Temasek Holdings）。</blockquote></p><p> Sembcorp has a market value of S$2.4 billion ($1.8 billion), while Keppel, whose businesses include property and infrastructure, is valued at S$9.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>胜科的市值为 24 亿新元（18 亿美元），而业务包括房地产和基础设施的吉宝的市值为 93 亿新元。</blockquote></p><p> Keppel declined comment while there was no immediate response from Sembcorp Marine to a Reuters query. Both companies are holding separate news conferences later on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>吉宝拒绝置评，而胜科海事没有立即回应路透社的询问。两家公司将于周四晚些时候分别举行新闻发布会。</blockquote></p><p> The sources said boards of both companies are meeting to begin discussions that could take many months and ultimately result in Keppel Corp hiving off its O&amp;M business and combining it with Sembcorp Marine, the sources said.</p><p><blockquote>消息人士称，两家公司的董事会正在开会开始讨论，这可能需要数月时间，最终导致吉宝公司剥离其运维业务，并将其与胜科海事合并。</blockquote></p><p> The sources declined to be identified as they were not authorised to speak to media.</p><p><blockquote>这些消息人士拒绝透露姓名，因为他们无权接受媒体采访。</blockquote></p><p> Markets have been expecting a much-needed consolidation in the rig-building sector as companies in the shipbuilding and marine sectors in markets such as South Korea and China have already joined forces amid a weak sector outlook.</p><p><blockquote>市场一直预计钻井平台建造行业将出现急需的整合，因为韩国和中国等市场的造船和船舶行业公司已经在行业前景疲软的情况下联手。</blockquote></p><p> Keppel’s shares have lost around 15% over the past 12 months, while Sembcorp has tumbled 40%.</p><p><blockquote>吉宝的股价在过去 12 个月中下跌了约 15%，胜科的股价则暴跌了 40%。</blockquote></p><p> Last year, Temasek scrapped a $3 billion move to raise its stake in Keppel and take control, following Keppel’s poor performance.</p><p><blockquote>去年，由于吉宝业绩不佳，淡马锡放弃了以 30 亿美元增持吉宝股份并控制吉宝的举措。</blockquote></p><p> Then this year, Keppel said it was exploring options for its O&amp;M business, as part of the group’s 10-year strategy to refocus its portfolio on energy and environment, urban development, connectivity and asset management.</p><p><blockquote>今年，吉宝表示正在探索运维业务的选择，这是集团将其投资组合重新聚焦于能源与环境、城市发展、互联互通和资产管理的 10 年战略的一部分。</blockquote></p><p> Market talk of a consolidation between the rig builders had first resurfaced in June 2020 when Sembcorp Industries, the former parent of Sembcorp Marine, unveiled plans to demerge its core business from the lossmaking rig builder.</p><p><blockquote>2020 年 6 月，市场关于钻井平台制造商合并的讨论首次重新浮出水面，当时胜科海事的前母公司胜科工业公布了将其核心业务从亏损的钻井平台制造商中分离出来的计划。</blockquote></p><p> Then Temasek stepped in to support a $1.5 billion rights issue by Sembcorp Marine.</p><p><blockquote>随后淡马锡介入支持胜科海事价值 15 亿美元的配股。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Keppel, Sembcorp Marine in talks for marine services deal, sources say<blockquote>消息人士称，吉宝和胜科海事正在就海事服务交易进行谈判</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nKeppel, Sembcorp Marine in talks for marine services deal, sources say<blockquote>消息人士称，吉宝和胜科海事正在就海事服务交易进行谈判</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-24 13:48</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) -Temasek-backed Singapore conglomerate Keppel Corp and Sembcorp Marine are set to begin talks to explore combining their ailing offshore and marine (O&amp;M) businesses, two sources familiar with the matter said on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社） - 两位知情人士周四表示，淡马锡支持的新加坡企业集团吉宝公司和胜科海事将开始谈判，探讨合并其陷入困境的近海和海事 (O&amp;M) 业务。</blockquote></p><p> A potential deal would bring together one of the world’s largest offshore oil rig builders with smaller rival Sembcorp after the businesses were whiplashed by years of oversupply in the sector, sustained weakness in oil prices and a drop in new orders.</p><p><blockquote>一项潜在的交易将使全球最大的海上石油钻井平台建造商之一与规模较小的竞争对手胜科公司（Sembcorp）走到一起，因为多年来该行业供应过剩、油价持续疲软和新订单下降使两家公司的业务受到重创。</blockquote></p><p> “Consolidation is needed simply because of competition, and the need for bigger working capital to take on new and bigger projects,” said Joel Ng at KGI Securities. Both companies own a network of shipyards in Singapore and overseas, including in Brazil, and employ thousands of workers.</p><p><blockquote>“凯基证券（KGI Securities）的 Joel Ng 说：”之所以需要整合，仅仅是因为竞争，以及需要更多的营运资金来承接新的、更大的项目。两家公司都在新加坡和海外（包括巴西）拥有造船厂网络，并雇佣了数千名工人。</blockquote></p><p> Trading in shares of Keppel and Sembcorp, which both count Singapore state investor Temasek Holdings as their largest shareholder, was halted on Thursday pending announcements.</p><p><blockquote>吉宝（Keppel）和胜科（Sembcorp）的股票交易周四暂停，等待公告，这两家公司的最大股东都是新加坡国家投资者淡马锡控股（Temasek Holdings）。</blockquote></p><p> Sembcorp has a market value of S$2.4 billion ($1.8 billion), while Keppel, whose businesses include property and infrastructure, is valued at S$9.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>胜科的市值为 24 亿新元（18 亿美元），而业务包括房地产和基础设施的吉宝的市值为 93 亿新元。</blockquote></p><p> Keppel declined comment while there was no immediate response from Sembcorp Marine to a Reuters query. Both companies are holding separate news conferences later on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>吉宝拒绝置评，而胜科海事没有立即回应路透社的询问。两家公司将于周四晚些时候分别举行新闻发布会。</blockquote></p><p> The sources said boards of both companies are meeting to begin discussions that could take many months and ultimately result in Keppel Corp hiving off its O&amp;M business and combining it with Sembcorp Marine, the sources said.</p><p><blockquote>消息人士称，两家公司的董事会正在开会开始讨论，这可能需要数月时间，最终导致吉宝公司剥离其运维业务，并将其与胜科海事合并。</blockquote></p><p> The sources declined to be identified as they were not authorised to speak to media.</p><p><blockquote>这些消息人士拒绝透露姓名，因为他们无权接受媒体采访。</blockquote></p><p> Markets have been expecting a much-needed consolidation in the rig-building sector as companies in the shipbuilding and marine sectors in markets such as South Korea and China have already joined forces amid a weak sector outlook.</p><p><blockquote>市场一直预计钻井平台建造行业将出现急需的整合，因为韩国和中国等市场的造船和船舶行业公司已经在行业前景疲软的情况下联手。</blockquote></p><p> Keppel’s shares have lost around 15% over the past 12 months, while Sembcorp has tumbled 40%.</p><p><blockquote>吉宝的股价在过去 12 个月中下跌了约 15%，胜科的股价则暴跌了 40%。</blockquote></p><p> Last year, Temasek scrapped a $3 billion move to raise its stake in Keppel and take control, following Keppel’s poor performance.</p><p><blockquote>去年，由于吉宝业绩不佳，淡马锡放弃了以 30 亿美元增持吉宝股份并控制吉宝的举措。</blockquote></p><p> Then this year, Keppel said it was exploring options for its O&amp;M business, as part of the group’s 10-year strategy to refocus its portfolio on energy and environment, urban development, connectivity and asset management.</p><p><blockquote>今年，吉宝表示正在探索运维业务的选择，这是集团将其投资组合重新聚焦于能源与环境、城市发展、互联互通和资产管理的 10 年战略的一部分。</blockquote></p><p> Market talk of a consolidation between the rig builders had first resurfaced in June 2020 when Sembcorp Industries, the former parent of Sembcorp Marine, unveiled plans to demerge its core business from the lossmaking rig builder.</p><p><blockquote>2020 年 6 月，市场关于钻井平台制造商合并的讨论首次重新浮出水面，当时胜科海事的前母公司胜科工业公布了将其核心业务从亏损的钻井平台制造商中分离出来的计划。</blockquote></p><p> Then Temasek stepped in to support a $1.5 billion rights issue by Sembcorp Marine.</p><p><blockquote>随后淡马锡介入支持胜科海事价值 15 亿美元的配股。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/keppel-corp-trading-halt-sembcorp-marine/update-3-keppel-sembcorp-marine-in-talks-for-marine-services-deal-sources-say-idUSL2N2O536D\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BN4.SI":"吉宝有限公司"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/keppel-corp-trading-halt-sembcorp-marine/update-3-keppel-sembcorp-marine-in-talks-for-marine-services-deal-sources-say-idUSL2N2O536D","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187067912","content_text":"(Reuters) -Temasek-backed Singapore conglomerate Keppel Corp and Sembcorp Marine are set to begin talks to explore combining their ailing offshore and marine (O&M) businesses, two sources familiar with the matter said on Thursday.\nA potential deal would bring together one of the world’s largest offshore oil rig builders with smaller rival Sembcorp after the businesses were whiplashed by years of oversupply in the sector, sustained weakness in oil prices and a drop in new orders.\n“Consolidation is needed simply because of competition, and the need for bigger working capital to take on new and bigger projects,” said Joel Ng at KGI Securities. Both companies own a network of shipyards in Singapore and overseas, including in Brazil, and employ thousands of workers.\nTrading in shares of Keppel and Sembcorp, which both count Singapore state investor Temasek Holdings as their largest shareholder, was halted on Thursday pending announcements.\nSembcorp has a market value of S$2.4 billion ($1.8 billion), while Keppel, whose businesses include property and infrastructure, is valued at S$9.3 billion.\nKeppel declined comment while there was no immediate response from Sembcorp Marine to a Reuters query. Both companies are holding separate news conferences later on Thursday.\nThe sources said boards of both companies are meeting to begin discussions that could take many months and ultimately result in Keppel Corp hiving off its O&M business and combining it with Sembcorp Marine, the sources said.\nThe sources declined to be identified as they were not authorised to speak to media.\nMarkets have been expecting a much-needed consolidation in the rig-building sector as companies in the shipbuilding and marine sectors in markets such as South Korea and China have already joined forces amid a weak sector outlook.\nKeppel’s shares have lost around 15% over the past 12 months, while Sembcorp has tumbled 40%.\nLast year, Temasek scrapped a $3 billion move to raise its stake in Keppel and take control, following Keppel’s poor performance.\nThen this year, Keppel said it was exploring options for its O&M business, as part of the group’s 10-year strategy to refocus its portfolio on energy and environment, urban development, connectivity and asset management.\nMarket talk of a consolidation between the rig builders had first resurfaced in June 2020 when Sembcorp Industries, the former parent of Sembcorp Marine, unveiled plans to demerge its core business from the lossmaking rig builder.\nThen Temasek stepped in to support a $1.5 billion rights issue by Sembcorp Marine.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BN4.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":181066432,"gmtCreate":1623367780026,"gmtModify":1634034222744,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"[Happy] [Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/181066432","repostId":"1152704038","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152704038","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623367425,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1152704038?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-11 07:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"China's Didi reveals U.S. IPO filing, sets stage for blockbuster New York float<blockquote>中国滴滴公布美国 IPO 文件，为纽约重磅上市奠定基础</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152704038","media":"reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -Didi Chuxing, China’s biggest ride-hailing firm, on Thursday made public its filing for a","content":"<p>(Reuters) -Didi Chuxing, China’s biggest ride-hailing firm, on Thursday made public its filing for a U.S. stock market listing, setting the stage for what is expected to be the world’s biggest initial public offering this year.</p><p><blockquote>(路透社）--中国最大的网约车公司滴滴出行周四公开了其在美国股市上市的申请，为今年有望成为全球最大的首次公开募股奠定了基础。</blockquote></p><p> The company - backed by Asia’s largest technology investment firms, SoftBank, Alibaba and Tencent - did not reveal the size of the offering, but sources familiar with the matter had previously told Reuters that the ride-hailing giant could raise around $10 billion and seek a valuation of close to $100 billion.</p><p><blockquote>该公司得到了亚洲最大的科技投资公司软银、阿里巴巴-SW和腾讯控股的支持，没有透露发行规模，但熟悉内情的消息人士此前曾告诉路透社，这家叫车巨头可能会融资约 100 亿美元，并寻求接近 1000 亿美元的估值。</blockquote></p><p> At that valuation, Didi’s stock market flotation would be the biggest Chinese share offering in the United States, since Alibaba raised $25 billion in its blockbuster IPO in 2014.</p><p><blockquote>按照这一估值，滴滴的首次公开募股将是自阿里巴巴-SW 2014 年首次公开募股（IPO）筹集 250 亿美元以来，在美国最大的中国股票发行。</blockquote></p><p> In its filing on Thursday, Didi revealed slower revenue growth in 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which grounded the global ride-hailing industry to a halt as lockdowns were enforced all over the globe.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴在周四提交的文件中透露，由于 COVID-19 大流行的影响，2020 年收入增长放缓，随着全球各地实施封锁，全球网约车行业陷入停滞。</blockquote></p><p> For 2020, Didi reported revenue of 141.7 billion yuan ($22.17 billion), down from 154.8 billion yuan a year earlier. Net loss stood at 10.6 billion yuan in 2020, compared with 9.7 billion yuan a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>2020 年，滴滴报告收入为 1,417 亿元人民币（221.7 亿美元），低于上年同期的 1,548 亿元人民币。2020年净亏损106亿元，上年同期为97亿元。</blockquote></p><p> However, Didi started 2021 strongly, as businesses reopened in China. Revenue more than doubled to 42.2 billion yuan (US$6.4 billion) for the three months ended March 31 from 20.5 billion yuan a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>然而，随着中国业务重新开业，滴滴在2021年开局强劲。截至 3 月 31 日的三个月，收入从去年同期的 205 亿元人民币增长了一倍多，达到 422 亿元人民币（64 亿美元）。</blockquote></p><p> CHINESE IPO GOLD RUSH</p><p><blockquote>中国IPO淘金热</blockquote></p><p> Didi confidentially filed for its IPO in April. A source familiar with the matter on Thursday said Didi was aiming to go public in July.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴于4月份秘密申请IPO。一位知情人士周四表示，滴滴的目标是在7月份上市。</blockquote></p><p> The mega IPO highlights the lucrative business opportunity presented by Asian tech giants for Wall Street’s big investment banks.</p><p><blockquote>这次大型首次公开募股凸显了亚洲科技巨头为华尔街大型投资银行带来的利润丰厚的商机。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier this year, Singapore’s biggest ride-hailing firm, Grab, struck a $40 billion deal with a special purpose acquisition company, backed by investment firm Altimeter, to go public in the United States.</p><p><blockquote>今年早些时候，新加坡最大的打车公司 Grab 与一家由投资公司 Altimeter 支持的特殊目的收购公司达成了一项价值 400 亿美元的协议，将在美国上市。</blockquote></p><p> Last year, Chinese companies raised $12 billion from U.S. listings, more than triple the fundraising amount in 2019, according to Refinitiv data. This year, the raise from Chinese floats on U.S. exchanges is expected to comfortably surpass last year’s tally.</p><p><blockquote>路孚特数据显示，去年中国公司从美国上市筹集了 120 亿美元，是 2019 年筹资额的三倍多。今年，中国在美国交易所的流通量预计将轻松超过去年。</blockquote></p><p> Didi, which merged with then main rival Kuaidi in 2015 to create a smartphone-based transport services giant, counts as its core business a mobile app, where users can hail taxis, privately owned cars, car-pool options and even buses in some cities.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴于2015年与当时的主要竞争对手快的合并，创建了一家基于智能手机的交通服务巨头，其核心业务是移动应用程序，用户可以在其中叫出租车、私家车、拼车，甚至在一些城市叫公交车。</blockquote></p><p> Didi plans to list American Depositary Shares (ADSs) on either Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol \"DIDI\", the company said. (bit.ly/2RGjK0s)</p><p><blockquote>滴滴表示，计划在纳斯达克或纽约证券交易所上市美国存托股（ADS），股票代码为“DIDI”。(bit.ly/2RGjK0s)</blockquote></p><p> Didi Chief Executive Cheng Wei said last year the firm aims to have 800 million monthly active users globally and complete 100 million orders a day by 2022, including ride-sharing, bike and food delivery orders.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴首席执行官程维去年表示，该公司的目标是到2022年在全球拥有8亿月活跃用户，每天完成1亿个订单，包括拼车、自行车和送餐订单。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and J.P.Morgan are the lead underwriters for the offering.</p><p><blockquote>高盛、摩根士丹利和摩根大通是此次发行的主承销商。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China's Didi reveals U.S. IPO filing, sets stage for blockbuster New York float<blockquote>中国滴滴公布美国 IPO 文件，为纽约重磅上市奠定基础</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina's Didi reveals U.S. IPO filing, sets stage for blockbuster New York float<blockquote>中国滴滴公布美国 IPO 文件，为纽约重磅上市奠定基础</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-11 07:23</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) -Didi Chuxing, China’s biggest ride-hailing firm, on Thursday made public its filing for a U.S. stock market listing, setting the stage for what is expected to be the world’s biggest initial public offering this year.</p><p><blockquote>(路透社）--中国最大的网约车公司滴滴出行周四公开了其在美国股市上市的申请，为今年有望成为全球最大的首次公开募股奠定了基础。</blockquote></p><p> The company - backed by Asia’s largest technology investment firms, SoftBank, Alibaba and Tencent - did not reveal the size of the offering, but sources familiar with the matter had previously told Reuters that the ride-hailing giant could raise around $10 billion and seek a valuation of close to $100 billion.</p><p><blockquote>该公司得到了亚洲最大的科技投资公司软银、阿里巴巴-SW和腾讯控股的支持，没有透露发行规模，但熟悉内情的消息人士此前曾告诉路透社，这家叫车巨头可能会融资约 100 亿美元，并寻求接近 1000 亿美元的估值。</blockquote></p><p> At that valuation, Didi’s stock market flotation would be the biggest Chinese share offering in the United States, since Alibaba raised $25 billion in its blockbuster IPO in 2014.</p><p><blockquote>按照这一估值，滴滴的首次公开募股将是自阿里巴巴-SW 2014 年首次公开募股（IPO）筹集 250 亿美元以来，在美国最大的中国股票发行。</blockquote></p><p> In its filing on Thursday, Didi revealed slower revenue growth in 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which grounded the global ride-hailing industry to a halt as lockdowns were enforced all over the globe.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴在周四提交的文件中透露，由于 COVID-19 大流行的影响，2020 年收入增长放缓，随着全球各地实施封锁，全球网约车行业陷入停滞。</blockquote></p><p> For 2020, Didi reported revenue of 141.7 billion yuan ($22.17 billion), down from 154.8 billion yuan a year earlier. Net loss stood at 10.6 billion yuan in 2020, compared with 9.7 billion yuan a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>2020 年，滴滴报告收入为 1,417 亿元人民币（221.7 亿美元），低于上年同期的 1,548 亿元人民币。2020年净亏损106亿元，上年同期为97亿元。</blockquote></p><p> However, Didi started 2021 strongly, as businesses reopened in China. Revenue more than doubled to 42.2 billion yuan (US$6.4 billion) for the three months ended March 31 from 20.5 billion yuan a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>然而，随着中国业务重新开业，滴滴在2021年开局强劲。截至 3 月 31 日的三个月，收入从去年同期的 205 亿元人民币增长了一倍多，达到 422 亿元人民币（64 亿美元）。</blockquote></p><p> CHINESE IPO GOLD RUSH</p><p><blockquote>中国IPO淘金热</blockquote></p><p> Didi confidentially filed for its IPO in April. A source familiar with the matter on Thursday said Didi was aiming to go public in July.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴于4月份秘密申请IPO。一位知情人士周四表示，滴滴的目标是在7月份上市。</blockquote></p><p> The mega IPO highlights the lucrative business opportunity presented by Asian tech giants for Wall Street’s big investment banks.</p><p><blockquote>这次大型首次公开募股凸显了亚洲科技巨头为华尔街大型投资银行带来的利润丰厚的商机。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier this year, Singapore’s biggest ride-hailing firm, Grab, struck a $40 billion deal with a special purpose acquisition company, backed by investment firm Altimeter, to go public in the United States.</p><p><blockquote>今年早些时候，新加坡最大的打车公司 Grab 与一家由投资公司 Altimeter 支持的特殊目的收购公司达成了一项价值 400 亿美元的协议，将在美国上市。</blockquote></p><p> Last year, Chinese companies raised $12 billion from U.S. listings, more than triple the fundraising amount in 2019, according to Refinitiv data. This year, the raise from Chinese floats on U.S. exchanges is expected to comfortably surpass last year’s tally.</p><p><blockquote>路孚特数据显示，去年中国公司从美国上市筹集了 120 亿美元，是 2019 年筹资额的三倍多。今年，中国在美国交易所的流通量预计将轻松超过去年。</blockquote></p><p> Didi, which merged with then main rival Kuaidi in 2015 to create a smartphone-based transport services giant, counts as its core business a mobile app, where users can hail taxis, privately owned cars, car-pool options and even buses in some cities.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴于2015年与当时的主要竞争对手快的合并，创建了一家基于智能手机的交通服务巨头，其核心业务是移动应用程序，用户可以在其中叫出租车、私家车、拼车，甚至在一些城市叫公交车。</blockquote></p><p> Didi plans to list American Depositary Shares (ADSs) on either Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol \"DIDI\", the company said. (bit.ly/2RGjK0s)</p><p><blockquote>滴滴表示，计划在纳斯达克或纽约证券交易所上市美国存托股（ADS），股票代码为“DIDI”。(bit.ly/2RGjK0s)</blockquote></p><p> Didi Chief Executive Cheng Wei said last year the firm aims to have 800 million monthly active users globally and complete 100 million orders a day by 2022, including ride-sharing, bike and food delivery orders.</p><p><blockquote>滴滴首席执行官程维去年表示，该公司的目标是到2022年在全球拥有8亿月活跃用户，每天完成1亿个订单，包括拼车、自行车和送餐订单。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and J.P.Morgan are the lead underwriters for the offering.</p><p><blockquote>高盛、摩根士丹利和摩根大通是此次发行的主承销商。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/didi-ipo/update-2-chinas-didi-reveals-u-s-ipo-filing-sets-stage-for-blockbuster-new-york-float-idUSL3N2NS42U\">reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIDI":"滴滴(已退市)","UBER":"优步"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/didi-ipo/update-2-chinas-didi-reveals-u-s-ipo-filing-sets-stage-for-blockbuster-new-york-float-idUSL3N2NS42U","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152704038","content_text":"(Reuters) -Didi Chuxing, China’s biggest ride-hailing firm, on Thursday made public its filing for a U.S. stock market listing, setting the stage for what is expected to be the world’s biggest initial public offering this year.\nThe company - backed by Asia’s largest technology investment firms, SoftBank, Alibaba and Tencent - did not reveal the size of the offering, but sources familiar with the matter had previously told Reuters that the ride-hailing giant could raise around $10 billion and seek a valuation of close to $100 billion.\nAt that valuation, Didi’s stock market flotation would be the biggest Chinese share offering in the United States, since Alibaba raised $25 billion in its blockbuster IPO in 2014.\nIn its filing on Thursday, Didi revealed slower revenue growth in 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which grounded the global ride-hailing industry to a halt as lockdowns were enforced all over the globe.\nFor 2020, Didi reported revenue of 141.7 billion yuan ($22.17 billion), down from 154.8 billion yuan a year earlier. Net loss stood at 10.6 billion yuan in 2020, compared with 9.7 billion yuan a year earlier.\nHowever, Didi started 2021 strongly, as businesses reopened in China. Revenue more than doubled to 42.2 billion yuan (US$6.4 billion) for the three months ended March 31 from 20.5 billion yuan a year earlier.\nCHINESE IPO GOLD RUSH\nDidi confidentially filed for its IPO in April. A source familiar with the matter on Thursday said Didi was aiming to go public in July.\nThe mega IPO highlights the lucrative business opportunity presented by Asian tech giants for Wall Street’s big investment banks.\nEarlier this year, Singapore’s biggest ride-hailing firm, Grab, struck a $40 billion deal with a special purpose acquisition company, backed by investment firm Altimeter, to go public in the United States.\nLast year, Chinese companies raised $12 billion from U.S. listings, more than triple the fundraising amount in 2019, according to Refinitiv data. This year, the raise from Chinese floats on U.S. exchanges is expected to comfortably surpass last year’s tally.\nDidi, which merged with then main rival Kuaidi in 2015 to create a smartphone-based transport services giant, counts as its core business a mobile app, where users can hail taxis, privately owned cars, car-pool options and even buses in some cities.\nDidi plans to list American Depositary Shares (ADSs) on either Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol \"DIDI\", the company said. (bit.ly/2RGjK0s)\nDidi Chief Executive Cheng Wei said last year the firm aims to have 800 million monthly active users globally and complete 100 million orders a day by 2022, including ride-sharing, bike and food delivery orders.\nGoldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and J.P.Morgan are the lead underwriters for the offering.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DIDI":0.9,"UBER":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155523840,"gmtCreate":1625445615080,"gmtModify":1631892906849,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/155523840","repostId":"1169840279","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":386,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152553999,"gmtCreate":1625316594711,"gmtModify":1631892906866,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/152553999","repostId":"1136694264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136694264","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1625293431,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1136694264?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-03 14:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并未气馁，反复抨击评级</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136694264","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment Holdin","content":"<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p><p><blockquote>周五上午，Iceberg Researchannouncedit 已在<b>AMC院线控股</b>AMC 4.08%。Iceberg 表示，由于 6 月份股票交易横盘，期权交易员已经亏损，而且该股周围的水泵看起来不稳定。</blockquote></p><p> The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息并没有阻止机构继续抛售 AMC 看涨期权合约，周五期权交易员买入了价值超过 259 万美元的合约。这些合约的到期日从今天到 12 月 17 日不等，一些交易员选择了高达 145 美元的执行价格。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 的股票从周五横盘交易形成的对称三角形中看跌突破，但守住了 47.91 美元的支撑位，并从该支撑位反弹。多头希望看到下跌继续被买入，并希望 AMC 以打印锤式烛台并收于 21 天指数移动平均线之上来结束这一天。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>当出现横扫订单时，表明交易者希望快速建仓，并预计股价即将出现大幅波动。扫货者为看涨期权或看跌期权支付市场价格，而不是出价，扫货者扫描多个交易所的订单簿，立即完成订单。</blockquote></p><p> These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p><p><blockquote>这类看涨期权期权订单通常由机构下达，散户投资者会发现留意扫货很有用，因为这表明 “聪明的资金 ”已经建仓。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p><p><blockquote><b>AMC 期权交易：</b>以下是 Benzinga Pro 提供的著名选项警报：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul>  <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li> </ul> <b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周五上午 9 点 42 分，一名交易员在 265 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 59 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 52,205 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.97 美元。</li><li>上午 9:51，一名交易员在 247 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.95美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 52 分，一名交易员在 248 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 260,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 10.50 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 356 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 311,500 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.75 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 266,600 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.60 美元。</li><li>上午 9:56，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.60美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 57 分，一名交易员在 300 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 28 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约23.40美元。</li><li>上午 9:58，一名交易员在 289 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了303,450美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约10.50美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 58 分，一名交易员在 580 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 55 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 278,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.80 美元。</li><li>上午 10:07，一名交易员在 258 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 80 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.52 美元。</li><li>上午 10:24，一名交易员在 352 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 50 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 54,560 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.55 美元。</li><li>上午 10:26，一名交易员在 234 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 7 月 23 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.31 美元。</li><li>上午 10:31，一名交易员在 224 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 9 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 105,280 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.70 美元。</li><li>上午 10:38，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 47 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 146,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 2.92 美元。</li><li>中午 12:02，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 45 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 305,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 6.10 美元。</li></ul><b>AMC价格走势：</b>截至发稿时，AMC院线股价下跌 5.3%，至 51.33 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并未气馁，反复抨击评级</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并未气馁，反复抨击评级</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-03 14:23</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p><p><blockquote>周五上午，Iceberg Researchannouncedit 已在<b>AMC院线控股</b>AMC 4.08%。Iceberg 表示，由于 6 月份股票交易横盘，期权交易员已经亏损，而且该股周围的水泵看起来不稳定。</blockquote></p><p> The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息并没有阻止机构继续抛售 AMC 看涨期权合约，周五期权交易员买入了价值超过 259 万美元的合约。这些合约的到期日从今天到 12 月 17 日不等，一些交易员选择了高达 145 美元的执行价格。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 的股票从周五横盘交易形成的对称三角形中看跌突破，但守住了 47.91 美元的支撑位，并从该支撑位反弹。多头希望看到下跌继续被买入，并希望 AMC 以打印锤式烛台并收于 21 天指数移动平均线之上来结束这一天。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>当出现横扫订单时，表明交易者希望快速建仓，并预计股价即将出现大幅波动。扫货者为看涨期权或看跌期权支付市场价格，而不是出价，扫货者扫描多个交易所的订单簿，立即完成订单。</blockquote></p><p> These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p><p><blockquote>这类看涨期权期权订单通常由机构下达，散户投资者会发现留意扫货很有用，因为这表明 “聪明的资金 ”已经建仓。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p><p><blockquote><b>AMC 期权交易：</b>以下是 Benzinga Pro 提供的著名选项警报：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul>  <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li> </ul> <b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周五上午 9 点 42 分，一名交易员在 265 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 59 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 52,205 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.97 美元。</li><li>上午 9:51，一名交易员在 247 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.95美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 52 分，一名交易员在 248 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 260,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 10.50 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 356 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 311,500 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.75 美元。</li><li>上午 9:53，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了 266,600 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 8.60 美元。</li><li>上午 9:56，一名交易员在 310 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 65 美元，将于 8 月 20 日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约8.60美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 57 分，一名交易员在 300 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 28 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约23.40美元。</li><li>上午 9:58，一名交易员在 289 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 120 美元，将于 12 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了303,450美元的看涨赌注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约10.50美元。</li><li>上午 9 点 58 分，一名交易员在 580 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 55 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 278,400 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.80 美元。</li><li>上午 10:07，一名交易员在 258 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 80 美元，将于 7 月 16 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.52 美元。</li><li>上午 10:24，一名交易员在 352 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 50 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 54,560 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.55 美元。</li><li>上午 10:26，一名交易员在 234 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 7 月 23 日到期。该交易代表了 39,216 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 1.31 美元。</li><li>上午 10:31，一名交易员在 224 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫描，执行价格为 145 美元，将于 9 月 17 日到期。该交易代表了 105,280 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 4.70 美元。</li><li>上午 10:38，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 47 美元，将于 7 月 2 日到期。该交易代表了 146,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 2.92 美元。</li><li>中午 12:02，一名交易员在 500 份AMC院线期权的出价附近执行了看涨期权扫荡，执行价格为 45 美元，将于 7 月 9 日到期。该交易代表了 305,000 美元的看涨押注，交易者为此支付了每份期权合约 6.10 美元。</li></ul><b>AMC价格走势：</b>截至发稿时，AMC院线股价下跌 5.3%，至 51.33 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136694264","content_text":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.\nThe news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.\nAMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.\nWhy It’s Important:When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.\nThese types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.\nThe AMC Option Trades:Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:\n\nAt 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.\nAt 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.\nAt 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.\nAt 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.\nAt 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.\nAt 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.\nAt 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.\nAt 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.\nAt 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.\n\nAMC Price Action:Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":645,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154447633,"gmtCreate":1625541938922,"gmtModify":1631892906836,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/154447633","repostId":"1190430616","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":669,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":124845931,"gmtCreate":1624759988923,"gmtModify":1631892906908,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nio[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"Nio[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"Nio[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/124845931","repostId":"1137119316","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137119316","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624754401,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1137119316?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-27 08:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Ford Or NIO? The Final Verdict<blockquote>福特还是蔚来？最终判决</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137119316","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"I am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.The comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.NIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.With Ford  launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO  will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>I am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.</li>  <li>The comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.</li>  <li>NIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5033fa117d7852799244b8275bc1000f\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"886\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>我在不同的类别中比较福特和蔚来。</li><li>此次比较旨在增进对福特和蔚来增长潜力的了解，同时突出市场地位和机遇的差异。</li><li>蔚来的增长速度比福特快得多，高估值可能是合理的。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> With Ford (F) launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO (NIO) will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based on market opportunity, scale, revenue model, growth prospects and valuation? I will compare Ford against NIO in each category and issue a final verdict at the end.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特公司（F）在电动汽车市场发起重大攻势，中国电动汽车制造商蔚来（蔚来）未来将面临另一个竞争对手争夺销量。根据市场机会、规模、收入模式、增长前景和估值，哪家汽车制造商提供了最好的交易？我将在每个类别中比较福特和蔚来，并在最后给出最终结论。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ford vs. NIO: The battle for the global electric vehicle market is heating up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>福特与蔚来：全球电动汽车市场之争正在升温</b></blockquote></p><p> Although there is a world of difference between Ford and NIO, both companies are set to go toe-to-toe in the rapidly growing global electric vehicle market. Ford’s fleet is not yet EV-focused but this is going to change: Feeling that the EV race is heating up, Ford said it is accelerating its electrification plan by investing&nbsp;$30B into its EV manufacturing capabilities until 2025. Ford’s previous capital plan called for a $22B investment in zero-emission vehicles. Ford also set an ambitious sales goal: 40% of its global sales will be electric within the next decade and 33% of pickup truck sales. Electric vehicle sales account for just 1% of Ford's sales today. As Ford is phasing out combustion engines, it is set to evolve into an all-electric vehicle maker by 2040.</p><p><blockquote>尽管福特和蔚来之间存在天壤之别，但两家公司都将在快速增长的全球电动汽车市场展开较量。福特的车队还没有以电动汽车为重点，但这种情况将会改变： 福特感觉到电动汽车竞赛正在升温，因此表示将加快其电气化计划，在 2025 年前投资 300 亿美元用于电动汽车制造能力。福特之前的资本计划要求投资 220 亿美元用于零排放汽车。福特还设定了一个雄心勃勃的销售目标：未来十年，其全球销量的 40% 将是电动汽车，皮卡车销量的 33% 将是电动汽车。目前，电动汽车销量仅占福特销量的 1%。随着福特逐步淘汰内燃机，它将在 2040 年发展成为一家全电动汽车制造商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Market opportunity</b></p><p><blockquote><b>市场机会</b></blockquote></p><p> In 2020, 3.2m electric vehicles were sold in the world which represented a small market share of just 4.2%. China, however, was responsible for buying 41% of all electric vehicles in the world in 2020. Chinese buyers purchased 1.3m electric vehicles last year and sales are set to grow fast as Beijing seeks to boost EV adoption. The second largest market for electric vehicles was Europe which accounted for 42% of global EV sales. The US is only the third-largest market for plug-in electric vehicles in the world.</p><p><blockquote>2020年，全球电动汽车销量为320万辆，市场份额仅为4.2%。然而，2020 年，中国购买了全球 41% 的电动汽车。去年，中国买家购买了 130 万辆电动汽车，随着北京寻求促进电动汽车的普及，销量将快速增长。电动汽车的第二大市场是欧洲，占全球电动汽车销量的42%。美国只是全球第三大插电式电动汽车市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b48c23b32134542f51227d9b1b612887\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"863\"><span>(Source: Wikipedia)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：维基百科）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> China, by far, is the fastest growing EV market in the world, although Europe is catching up fast, in part due to a legislative efforts to increase adoption of zero-emission passenger vehicles and because of massive investments in a Europe-wide charging station network. NIO is&nbsp;on the cusp of entering the European market&nbsp;in a bid to grow market share in the world’s second-largest EV market before the competition is ready.</p><p><blockquote>到目前为止，中国是世界上增长最快的电动汽车市场，尽管欧洲正在迅速迎头赶上，部分原因是立法努力增加零排放乘用车的采用，以及对欧洲范围内充电站网络的大量投资。蔚来正处于进军欧洲市场的风口浪尖，希望在竞争准备就绪之前扩大其在世界第二大电动汽车市场的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> Beijing is a driver behind the electrification of the Chinese auto industry: The government wants to see a&nbsp;twenty percent share&nbsp;of electric vehicles for new car sales by 2025 which will drive EV penetration in NIO’s home market.</p><p><blockquote>中国政府是蔚来汽车工业电气化的推动者： 中国政府希望到 2025 年，电动汽车在新车销售中所占份额达到 20%，这将推动电动汽车在中国本土市场的普及。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9871e44eaf69adb27151425887870ace\" tg-width=\"739\" tg-height=\"454\"><span>(Source:Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Turning to growth projections.</p><p><blockquote>转向增长预测。</blockquote></p><p> With more favorable government policies for EV makers in places like China and Europe, these markets are poised to see the fastest sales growth and the highest EV adoption rates in the world. China is not only the largest market due to population size but is also expected to outperform all other markets in the world in EV sales until 2030.</p><p><blockquote>随着中国和欧洲等地政府对电动汽车制造商采取更有利的政策，这些市场将迎来世界上最快的销售增长和最高的电动汽车采用率。由于人口规模，中国不仅是最大的市场，而且预计到2030年，电动汽车销量将超过全球所有其他市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/61d19dff2f34e2d8828aca854e85d84a\" tg-width=\"825\" tg-height=\"565\"><span>(Source:McKinsey)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：麦肯锡）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Since China has a larger total market size, a higher EV adoption rate, stronger expected sales growth and a more favorable regulatory framework, the winner here would be: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>由于中国拥有更大的总市场规模、更高的电动汽车采用率、更强劲的预期销售增长和更有利的监管框架，这里的赢家将是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Scale and manufacturing competence</b></p><p><blockquote><b>规模和制造能力</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford has a century’s worth of manufacturing experience. But Ford, so far, has only one all-electric vehicle in its product line-up that compares to NIO: The Mustang Mach-E SUV. In 2022, Ford will begin to sell the all-electric F-150 Lightening which builds on the success of Ford’s best-selling pick-up truck. NIO already has a stronger product catalog including the 5-seater ES6 SUV, the 5-seater coupe SUV EC6 and the ES8, a 6-seater and 7-seater full-sized SUV.</p><p><blockquote>福特拥有百年的制造经验。但到目前为止，福特的产品阵容中只有一款与蔚来相比的全电动汽车：野马 Mach-E SUV。2022 年，福特将开始销售全电动 F-150 Lightening，该车建立在福特最畅销皮卡车的成功基础上。蔚来已经拥有更强大的产品目录，包括5座ES6 SUV、5座轿跑车SUV EC6以及6座和7座全尺寸SUV ES8。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Since NIO is solely focused on producing EVs and occupies a very small and defined niche, the Chinese firm has an advantage as far as EV-manufacturing expertise goes. The question is how long this advantage can last. Ford has extensive experience in building cars and can leverage a global manufacturing base to ramp up EV production faster than any niche EV maker could ever hope to achieve. This makes Ford a very serious rival not only to Tesla (TSLA) in the US, but also to NIO abroad. Ford is accelerating its electrification plans and it has the resources and the ambition to become a leader in EVs within the next decade. Ford’s proposed $30B spending on the electrification of its fleet will accelerate its transformation and turn Ford into a long term threat to other EV makers.</p><p><blockquote>由于蔚来只专注于生产电动汽车，并且占据了一个非常小且明确的利基市场，这家中国公司在电动汽车制造专业知识方面具有优势。问题是这种优势能持续多久。福特在制造汽车方面拥有丰富的经验，可以利用全球制造基地以比任何利基电动汽车制造商希望实现的速度更快地提高电动汽车产量。这使得福特不仅在美国是特斯拉（TSLA）的有力竞争对手，而且在国外也是蔚来的有力竞争对手。福特正在加速其电气化计划，它有资源和雄心在未来十年内成为电动汽车的领导者。福特提议斥资 300 亿美元用于车队电气化，这将加速其转型，并使福特成为其他电动汽车制造商的长期威胁。</blockquote></p><p> Winner here: Ford.</p><p><blockquote>这里的赢家：福特。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Differentiation and BaaS revenue model</b></p><p><blockquote><b>差异化与BaaS收入模式</b></blockquote></p><p> Both Ford and NIO know about the importance of differentiation in a market that will only get more competitive over time, which is why both companies are investing heavily in a related field that can break or solidify dominance in the EV market: Battery technology.</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来都知道差异化在这个市场中的重要性，随着时间的推移，这个市场只会变得更加竞争，这就是为什么两家公司都在一个相关领域大力投资，这个领域可以打破或巩固电动汽车市场的主导地位：电池技术。</blockquote></p><p> Ford is&nbsp;forming a joint venture&nbsp;with South Korean battery technology company SK Innovation to secure supply of traction battery cells and array modules. The joint venture is meant to accelerate battery deliveries and will produce approximately 60 GWh annually, enough to cover 25% of Ford’s estimated annual energy demand by 2030. NIO is also investing in battery technology and has&nbsp;formed its own joint venture&nbsp;to secure battery supply.</p><p><blockquote>福特正在与韩国电池技术公司 SK Innovation 成立一家合资企业，以确保牵引电池芯和阵列模块的供应。该合资企业旨在加快电池交付速度，年产量约为 60 GWh，足以满足福特到 2030 年预计年能源需求的 25%。蔚来也在投资电池技术，并组建了自己的合资企业来确保电池供应。</blockquote></p><p> The difference to Ford is that NIO’s battery investment strategy revolves around a battery subscription model, also called “battery-as-a-service”, which creates a strong, long term revenue opportunity for the Chinese vehicle maker. Under this “BaaS” model, users who buy a NIO electric vehicle get a 70,000 RMB initial discount, equivalent to $10,800, and can sign up for a monthly subscription to rent a rechargeable 70 kWh battery. Batteries can then be exchanged at one of NIO’s battery-swapping stations which can be found in most big Chinese cities. A battery subscription costs 980 RMB monthly which is the equivalent of $150.</p><p><blockquote>与福特不同的是，蔚来的电池投资战略围绕着电池订阅模式，也称为 “电池即服务 ”，这为这家中国汽车制造商创造了一个强大的长期收入机会。在这种 “BaaS” 模式下，用户购买蔚来电动汽车可获得 7 万元人民币的初始折扣，折合 1.08 万美元，并可签约包月租赁 70 千瓦时的可充电电池。然后可以在蔚来的换电站更换电池，这些换电站在中国大多数大城市都有。电池订阅费用为每月980元人民币，相当于150美元。</blockquote></p><p> The BaaS model has a couple of benefits for both the vehicle maker and the user: Purchasing an electric vehicle from NIO gets a lot more affordable due to the up-front discount and the subscription model ensures that users benefit from advancement in battery technology and better performance over time. Decoupling battery costs from vehicle prices creates an entirely new revenue stream on a subscription basis for NIO. Revenues from “BaaS” subscriptions could be used to increase the density of NIO’s network of charging/replacement stations. The battery subscription model also binds customers to NIO, potentially increasing customer lifetime value.</p><p><blockquote>BaaS模式对汽车制造商和用户都有几个好处：由于前期折扣，从蔚来购买电动汽车变得更加实惠，订阅模式确保用户受益于电池技术的进步和随着时间的推移更好的性能。将电池成本与汽车价格脱钩，为蔚来创造了一个全新的订阅收入流。“BaaS ”订阅的收入可用于增加蔚来充电/换电站网络的密度。电池订阅模式还将客户绑定到蔚来，从而潜在地增加客户的终身价值。</blockquote></p><p> Ford and NIO are primed to benefit from falling battery costs for electric vehicles as they ramp up capital allocations. As more investments flow into developing more efficient batteries, performance will go up and costs will go down which should drive EV adoption and benefit all EV makers. This is because lower battery prices make EVs more competitive to passenger vehicles with combustion engines. But since NIO is structuring a part of its business model explicitly around battery subscriptions, NIO could benefit more than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特和蔚来增加资本配置，它们有望从电动汽车电池成本下降中受益。随着越来越多的投资流入开发更高效的电池，性能将会提高，成本将会下降，这应该会推动电动汽车的采用并使所有电动汽车制造商受益。这是因为较低的电池价格使电动汽车比内燃机乘用车更具竞争力。但由于蔚来明确围绕电池订阅构建部分商业模式，蔚来可能会比福特受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> Battery costs for EVs have decreased 70% since 2014, based on information provided by investment firm Schroders, and are set to decrease more this decade.</p><p><blockquote>根据投资公司施罗德提供的信息，自 2014 年以来，电动汽车的电池成本已下降 70%，并且本十年还将进一步下降。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c42acb75905affe7570a2f399ea3192f\" tg-width=\"758\" tg-height=\"449\"><span>(Source: Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The “BaaS” model is genius and could develop into a $500M a year revenue opportunity for NIO long term. Although Ford is ramping up its investments in battery technology, the winner in this category is: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>“BaaS ”模式是天才之作，从长远来看，它可能会发展成为蔚来每年 5 亿美元的收入机会。尽管福特正在加大对电池技术的投资，但这一类别的赢家是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Sales growth and valuation</b></p><p><blockquote><b>销售增长和估值</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford’s sales in May grew 4.1% Y/Y but electrified vehicle sales (including hybrids) surged 184% Y/Y as Ford sold a record 10,364 EVs/hybrids in May. Escape electrified sales and Explorer Hybrid grew sales at 125% and 132% Y/Y showing strong customer uptake. NIO delivered 6,711 vehicles last month including 3,017 ES6s, 1,412 ES8s and 2,282 EC6s. Total Y/Y delivery growth for May was 95.3%.</p><p><blockquote>福特 5 月份的销量同比增长 4.1%，但电动汽车销量（包括混合动力汽车）同比激增 184%，福特 5 月份售出了创纪录的 10,364 辆电动汽车/混合动力汽车。Escape electrified 和 Explorer Hybrid 的销量分别同比增长 125% 和 132%，显示出强劲的客户吸引力。蔚来上个月交付了 6,711 辆汽车，其中包括 3,017 辆 ES6、1,412 辆 ES8 和 2,282 辆 EC6。5 月份总交付量同比增长 95.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Ford's sales are fifty-four times larger than NIO's which creates more sales growth and revaluation potential for NIO.</p><p><blockquote>福特的销量是蔚来汽车的54倍，这为蔚来创造了更多的销售增长和重估潜力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df5a0a393e44ed74241c5effcdd92350\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> The difference in valuation between Ford and NIO is like the difference between night and day. This is because Ford is still seen as a mature vehicle maker with expected enterprise sales growth in the low-to-mid digits, despite explosive growth in the EV category. Ford is expected to grow revenues by 33% until FY 2025 (base year: FY 2020) and NIO by 808%!</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来之间的估值差异就像黑夜和白天之间的差异。这是因为尽管电动汽车类别实现了爆炸式增长，但福特仍被视为一家成熟的汽车制造商，预计企业销量增长将达到中低位数。福特预计到 2025 财年（基准年：2020 财年）收入将增长 33%，蔚来将增长 808%!</blockquote></p><p> Due to these differences in sales growth, NIO is the complete opposite of Ford, at least as far as valuation goes. The Chinese EV-maker is expected to see sales and delivery growth close to 100% this year and since NIO is only dealing in EVs, NIO gets a much higher market-cap-to-sales ratio than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>由于销售增长的这些差异，蔚来与福特完全相反，至少就估值而言是这样。这家中国电动汽车制造商预计今年的销量和交付量将增长接近 100%，由于蔚来只销售电动汽车，蔚来的市值与销量之比远高于福特。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/817605c6b1e82c03d0473ea570d32b8f\" tg-width=\"506\" tg-height=\"406\"><span>(Source: Author)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：作者）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>NIO has larger risks...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来有更大的风险……</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is the more risky venture, but also the one that offers the most promise. Government policy favors EV-makers like NIO. The potential for total global sales growth is larger for NIO as it operates from a smaller revenue base compared to Ford. But there are also a few things that work against NIO. For example, recalls due to production defects would be a much bigger challenge for NIO to overcome than for Ford which can rely on a global service and distribution network. NIO’s valuation is also not without risk as an unexpected slowing of sales growth due to production setbacks would leave a much larger dent in the financials.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来是风险更大的企业，但也是最有希望的企业。政府政策有利于蔚来等电动汽车制造商。与福特相比，蔚来的全球总销售额增长潜力更大，因为它的营收基础较小。但也有一些事情对蔚来不利。例如，与可以依赖全球服务和分销网络的福特相比，由于生产缺陷导致的召回对于蔚来来说将是一个更大的挑战。蔚来的估值也并非没有风险，因为生产受挫导致销售增长意外放缓，将对财务状况造成更大影响。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final verdict</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最终判决</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is definitely the more “sexy” vehicle maker. Strong adoption and sales growth in China and Europe support NIO. Its super smart BaaS model which decouples vehicle purchase prices from battery costs is genius. You pay a high price for this growth but the market opportunity for NIO is immense.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来绝对是更 “性感 ”的汽车制造商。在中国和欧洲的强劲采用率和销售增长支持了蔚来。其超级智能BaaS模型将车辆购买价格与电池成本脱钩，堪称天才。你为这种增长付出了高昂的代价，但蔚来的市场机会是巨大的。</blockquote></p><p> Ford’s EV sales are booming and the percentage of EV sales will increase as the vehicle maker electrifies its fleet. Ford has a lot of potential in the EV market but since EV sales are still a relatively low percentage of total sales, it will take a long time for Ford to complete its transformation.</p><p><blockquote>福特的电动汽车销量正在蓬勃发展，随着该汽车制造商车队电气化，电动汽车销量的比例也将不断增加。福特在电动汽车市场潜力巨大，但由于电动汽车销量占总销量的比例仍然相对较低，福特需要很长时间才能完成转型。</blockquote></p><p> If you believe in the potential of the global EV market, buy NIO. If you believe in the potential of the global EV market and don’t like much risk, buy Ford.</p><p><blockquote>如果您相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，请购买蔚来。如果你相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，又不喜欢太大的风险，那就买福特吧。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ford Or NIO? The Final Verdict<blockquote>福特还是蔚来？最终判决</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFord Or NIO? The Final Verdict<blockquote>福特还是蔚来？最终判决</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">seekingalpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-27 08:40</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>I am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.</li>  <li>The comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.</li>  <li>NIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5033fa117d7852799244b8275bc1000f\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"886\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>我在不同的类别中比较福特和蔚来。</li><li>此次比较旨在增进对福特和蔚来增长潜力的了解，同时突出市场地位和机遇的差异。</li><li>蔚来的增长速度比福特快得多，高估值可能是合理的。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>peterschreiber.media/iStock 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> With Ford (F) launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO (NIO) will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based on market opportunity, scale, revenue model, growth prospects and valuation? I will compare Ford against NIO in each category and issue a final verdict at the end.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特公司（F）在电动汽车市场发起重大攻势，中国电动汽车制造商蔚来（蔚来）未来将面临另一个竞争对手争夺销量。根据市场机会、规模、收入模式、增长前景和估值，哪家汽车制造商提供了最好的交易？我将在每个类别中比较福特和蔚来，并在最后给出最终结论。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ford vs. NIO: The battle for the global electric vehicle market is heating up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>福特与蔚来：全球电动汽车市场之争正在升温</b></blockquote></p><p> Although there is a world of difference between Ford and NIO, both companies are set to go toe-to-toe in the rapidly growing global electric vehicle market. Ford’s fleet is not yet EV-focused but this is going to change: Feeling that the EV race is heating up, Ford said it is accelerating its electrification plan by investing&nbsp;$30B into its EV manufacturing capabilities until 2025. Ford’s previous capital plan called for a $22B investment in zero-emission vehicles. Ford also set an ambitious sales goal: 40% of its global sales will be electric within the next decade and 33% of pickup truck sales. Electric vehicle sales account for just 1% of Ford's sales today. As Ford is phasing out combustion engines, it is set to evolve into an all-electric vehicle maker by 2040.</p><p><blockquote>尽管福特和蔚来之间存在天壤之别，但两家公司都将在快速增长的全球电动汽车市场展开较量。福特的车队还没有以电动汽车为重点，但这种情况将会改变： 福特感觉到电动汽车竞赛正在升温，因此表示将加快其电气化计划，在 2025 年前投资 300 亿美元用于电动汽车制造能力。福特之前的资本计划要求投资 220 亿美元用于零排放汽车。福特还设定了一个雄心勃勃的销售目标：未来十年，其全球销量的 40% 将是电动汽车，皮卡车销量的 33% 将是电动汽车。目前，电动汽车销量仅占福特销量的 1%。随着福特逐步淘汰内燃机，它将在 2040 年发展成为一家全电动汽车制造商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Market opportunity</b></p><p><blockquote><b>市场机会</b></blockquote></p><p> In 2020, 3.2m electric vehicles were sold in the world which represented a small market share of just 4.2%. China, however, was responsible for buying 41% of all electric vehicles in the world in 2020. Chinese buyers purchased 1.3m electric vehicles last year and sales are set to grow fast as Beijing seeks to boost EV adoption. The second largest market for electric vehicles was Europe which accounted for 42% of global EV sales. The US is only the third-largest market for plug-in electric vehicles in the world.</p><p><blockquote>2020年，全球电动汽车销量为320万辆，市场份额仅为4.2%。然而，2020 年，中国购买了全球 41% 的电动汽车。去年，中国买家购买了 130 万辆电动汽车，随着北京寻求促进电动汽车的普及，销量将快速增长。电动汽车的第二大市场是欧洲，占全球电动汽车销量的42%。美国只是全球第三大插电式电动汽车市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b48c23b32134542f51227d9b1b612887\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"863\"><span>(Source: Wikipedia)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：维基百科）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> China, by far, is the fastest growing EV market in the world, although Europe is catching up fast, in part due to a legislative efforts to increase adoption of zero-emission passenger vehicles and because of massive investments in a Europe-wide charging station network. NIO is&nbsp;on the cusp of entering the European market&nbsp;in a bid to grow market share in the world’s second-largest EV market before the competition is ready.</p><p><blockquote>到目前为止，中国是世界上增长最快的电动汽车市场，尽管欧洲正在迅速迎头赶上，部分原因是立法努力增加零排放乘用车的采用，以及对欧洲范围内充电站网络的大量投资。蔚来正处于进军欧洲市场的风口浪尖，希望在竞争准备就绪之前扩大其在世界第二大电动汽车市场的市场份额。</blockquote></p><p> Beijing is a driver behind the electrification of the Chinese auto industry: The government wants to see a&nbsp;twenty percent share&nbsp;of electric vehicles for new car sales by 2025 which will drive EV penetration in NIO’s home market.</p><p><blockquote>中国政府是蔚来汽车工业电气化的推动者： 中国政府希望到 2025 年，电动汽车在新车销售中所占份额达到 20%，这将推动电动汽车在中国本土市场的普及。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9871e44eaf69adb27151425887870ace\" tg-width=\"739\" tg-height=\"454\"><span>(Source:Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Turning to growth projections.</p><p><blockquote>转向增长预测。</blockquote></p><p> With more favorable government policies for EV makers in places like China and Europe, these markets are poised to see the fastest sales growth and the highest EV adoption rates in the world. China is not only the largest market due to population size but is also expected to outperform all other markets in the world in EV sales until 2030.</p><p><blockquote>随着中国和欧洲等地政府对电动汽车制造商采取更有利的政策，这些市场将迎来世界上最快的销售增长和最高的电动汽车采用率。由于人口规模，中国不仅是最大的市场，而且预计到2030年，电动汽车销量将超过全球所有其他市场。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/61d19dff2f34e2d8828aca854e85d84a\" tg-width=\"825\" tg-height=\"565\"><span>(Source:McKinsey)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：麦肯锡）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Since China has a larger total market size, a higher EV adoption rate, stronger expected sales growth and a more favorable regulatory framework, the winner here would be: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>由于中国拥有更大的总市场规模、更高的电动汽车采用率、更强劲的预期销售增长和更有利的监管框架，这里的赢家将是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Scale and manufacturing competence</b></p><p><blockquote><b>规模和制造能力</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford has a century’s worth of manufacturing experience. But Ford, so far, has only one all-electric vehicle in its product line-up that compares to NIO: The Mustang Mach-E SUV. In 2022, Ford will begin to sell the all-electric F-150 Lightening which builds on the success of Ford’s best-selling pick-up truck. NIO already has a stronger product catalog including the 5-seater ES6 SUV, the 5-seater coupe SUV EC6 and the ES8, a 6-seater and 7-seater full-sized SUV.</p><p><blockquote>福特拥有百年的制造经验。但到目前为止，福特的产品阵容中只有一款与蔚来相比的全电动汽车：野马 Mach-E SUV。2022 年，福特将开始销售全电动 F-150 Lightening，该车建立在福特最畅销皮卡车的成功基础上。蔚来已经拥有更强大的产品目录，包括5座ES6 SUV、5座轿跑车SUV EC6以及6座和7座全尺寸SUV ES8。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Since NIO is solely focused on producing EVs and occupies a very small and defined niche, the Chinese firm has an advantage as far as EV-manufacturing expertise goes. The question is how long this advantage can last. Ford has extensive experience in building cars and can leverage a global manufacturing base to ramp up EV production faster than any niche EV maker could ever hope to achieve. This makes Ford a very serious rival not only to Tesla (TSLA) in the US, but also to NIO abroad. Ford is accelerating its electrification plans and it has the resources and the ambition to become a leader in EVs within the next decade. Ford’s proposed $30B spending on the electrification of its fleet will accelerate its transformation and turn Ford into a long term threat to other EV makers.</p><p><blockquote>由于蔚来只专注于生产电动汽车，并且占据了一个非常小且明确的利基市场，这家中国公司在电动汽车制造专业知识方面具有优势。问题是这种优势能持续多久。福特在制造汽车方面拥有丰富的经验，可以利用全球制造基地以比任何利基电动汽车制造商希望实现的速度更快地提高电动汽车产量。这使得福特不仅在美国是特斯拉（TSLA）的有力竞争对手，而且在国外也是蔚来的有力竞争对手。福特正在加速其电气化计划，它有资源和雄心在未来十年内成为电动汽车的领导者。福特提议斥资 300 亿美元用于车队电气化，这将加速其转型，并使福特成为其他电动汽车制造商的长期威胁。</blockquote></p><p> Winner here: Ford.</p><p><blockquote>这里的赢家：福特。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Differentiation and BaaS revenue model</b></p><p><blockquote><b>差异化与BaaS收入模式</b></blockquote></p><p> Both Ford and NIO know about the importance of differentiation in a market that will only get more competitive over time, which is why both companies are investing heavily in a related field that can break or solidify dominance in the EV market: Battery technology.</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来都知道差异化在这个市场中的重要性，随着时间的推移，这个市场只会变得更加竞争，这就是为什么两家公司都在一个相关领域大力投资，这个领域可以打破或巩固电动汽车市场的主导地位：电池技术。</blockquote></p><p> Ford is&nbsp;forming a joint venture&nbsp;with South Korean battery technology company SK Innovation to secure supply of traction battery cells and array modules. The joint venture is meant to accelerate battery deliveries and will produce approximately 60 GWh annually, enough to cover 25% of Ford’s estimated annual energy demand by 2030. NIO is also investing in battery technology and has&nbsp;formed its own joint venture&nbsp;to secure battery supply.</p><p><blockquote>福特正在与韩国电池技术公司 SK Innovation 成立一家合资企业，以确保牵引电池芯和阵列模块的供应。该合资企业旨在加快电池交付速度，年产量约为 60 GWh，足以满足福特到 2030 年预计年能源需求的 25%。蔚来也在投资电池技术，并组建了自己的合资企业来确保电池供应。</blockquote></p><p> The difference to Ford is that NIO’s battery investment strategy revolves around a battery subscription model, also called “battery-as-a-service”, which creates a strong, long term revenue opportunity for the Chinese vehicle maker. Under this “BaaS” model, users who buy a NIO electric vehicle get a 70,000 RMB initial discount, equivalent to $10,800, and can sign up for a monthly subscription to rent a rechargeable 70 kWh battery. Batteries can then be exchanged at one of NIO’s battery-swapping stations which can be found in most big Chinese cities. A battery subscription costs 980 RMB monthly which is the equivalent of $150.</p><p><blockquote>与福特不同的是，蔚来的电池投资战略围绕着电池订阅模式，也称为 “电池即服务 ”，这为这家中国汽车制造商创造了一个强大的长期收入机会。在这种 “BaaS” 模式下，用户购买蔚来电动汽车可获得 7 万元人民币的初始折扣，折合 1.08 万美元，并可签约包月租赁 70 千瓦时的可充电电池。然后可以在蔚来的换电站更换电池，这些换电站在中国大多数大城市都有。电池订阅费用为每月980元人民币，相当于150美元。</blockquote></p><p> The BaaS model has a couple of benefits for both the vehicle maker and the user: Purchasing an electric vehicle from NIO gets a lot more affordable due to the up-front discount and the subscription model ensures that users benefit from advancement in battery technology and better performance over time. Decoupling battery costs from vehicle prices creates an entirely new revenue stream on a subscription basis for NIO. Revenues from “BaaS” subscriptions could be used to increase the density of NIO’s network of charging/replacement stations. The battery subscription model also binds customers to NIO, potentially increasing customer lifetime value.</p><p><blockquote>BaaS模式对汽车制造商和用户都有几个好处：由于前期折扣，从蔚来购买电动汽车变得更加实惠，订阅模式确保用户受益于电池技术的进步和随着时间的推移更好的性能。将电池成本与汽车价格脱钩，为蔚来创造了一个全新的订阅收入流。“BaaS ”订阅的收入可用于增加蔚来充电/换电站网络的密度。电池订阅模式还将客户绑定到蔚来，从而潜在地增加客户的终身价值。</blockquote></p><p> Ford and NIO are primed to benefit from falling battery costs for electric vehicles as they ramp up capital allocations. As more investments flow into developing more efficient batteries, performance will go up and costs will go down which should drive EV adoption and benefit all EV makers. This is because lower battery prices make EVs more competitive to passenger vehicles with combustion engines. But since NIO is structuring a part of its business model explicitly around battery subscriptions, NIO could benefit more than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特和蔚来增加资本配置，它们有望从电动汽车电池成本下降中受益。随着越来越多的投资流入开发更高效的电池，性能将会提高，成本将会下降，这应该会推动电动汽车的采用并使所有电动汽车制造商受益。这是因为较低的电池价格使电动汽车比内燃机乘用车更具竞争力。但由于蔚来明确围绕电池订阅构建部分商业模式，蔚来可能会比福特受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> Battery costs for EVs have decreased 70% since 2014, based on information provided by investment firm Schroders, and are set to decrease more this decade.</p><p><blockquote>根据投资公司施罗德提供的信息，自 2014 年以来，电动汽车的电池成本已下降 70%，并且本十年还将进一步下降。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c42acb75905affe7570a2f399ea3192f\" tg-width=\"758\" tg-height=\"449\"><span>(Source: Schroders)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：施罗德）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The “BaaS” model is genius and could develop into a $500M a year revenue opportunity for NIO long term. Although Ford is ramping up its investments in battery technology, the winner in this category is: NIO.</p><p><blockquote>“BaaS ”模式是天才之作，从长远来看，它可能会发展成为蔚来每年 5 亿美元的收入机会。尽管福特正在加大对电池技术的投资，但这一类别的赢家是：蔚来。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Sales growth and valuation</b></p><p><blockquote><b>销售增长和估值</b></blockquote></p><p> Ford’s sales in May grew 4.1% Y/Y but electrified vehicle sales (including hybrids) surged 184% Y/Y as Ford sold a record 10,364 EVs/hybrids in May. Escape electrified sales and Explorer Hybrid grew sales at 125% and 132% Y/Y showing strong customer uptake. NIO delivered 6,711 vehicles last month including 3,017 ES6s, 1,412 ES8s and 2,282 EC6s. Total Y/Y delivery growth for May was 95.3%.</p><p><blockquote>福特 5 月份的销量同比增长 4.1%，但电动汽车销量（包括混合动力汽车）同比激增 184%，福特 5 月份售出了创纪录的 10,364 辆电动汽车/混合动力汽车。Escape electrified 和 Explorer Hybrid 的销量分别同比增长 125% 和 132%，显示出强劲的客户吸引力。蔚来上个月交付了 6,711 辆汽车，其中包括 3,017 辆 ES6、1,412 辆 ES8 和 2,282 辆 EC6。5 月份总交付量同比增长 95.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Ford's sales are fifty-four times larger than NIO's which creates more sales growth and revaluation potential for NIO.</p><p><blockquote>福特的销量是蔚来汽车的54倍，这为蔚来创造了更多的销售增长和重估潜力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df5a0a393e44ed74241c5effcdd92350\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> The difference in valuation between Ford and NIO is like the difference between night and day. This is because Ford is still seen as a mature vehicle maker with expected enterprise sales growth in the low-to-mid digits, despite explosive growth in the EV category. Ford is expected to grow revenues by 33% until FY 2025 (base year: FY 2020) and NIO by 808%!</p><p><blockquote>福特和蔚来之间的估值差异就像黑夜和白天之间的差异。这是因为尽管电动汽车类别实现了爆炸式增长，但福特仍被视为一家成熟的汽车制造商，预计企业销量增长将达到中低位数。福特预计到 2025 财年（基准年：2020 财年）收入将增长 33%，蔚来将增长 808%!</blockquote></p><p> Due to these differences in sales growth, NIO is the complete opposite of Ford, at least as far as valuation goes. The Chinese EV-maker is expected to see sales and delivery growth close to 100% this year and since NIO is only dealing in EVs, NIO gets a much higher market-cap-to-sales ratio than Ford.</p><p><blockquote>由于销售增长的这些差异，蔚来与福特完全相反，至少就估值而言是这样。这家中国电动汽车制造商预计今年的销量和交付量将增长接近 100%，由于蔚来只销售电动汽车，蔚来的市值与销量之比远高于福特。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/817605c6b1e82c03d0473ea570d32b8f\" tg-width=\"506\" tg-height=\"406\"><span>(Source: Author)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>（来源：作者）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>NIO has larger risks...</b></p><p><blockquote><b>蔚来有更大的风险……</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is the more risky venture, but also the one that offers the most promise. Government policy favors EV-makers like NIO. The potential for total global sales growth is larger for NIO as it operates from a smaller revenue base compared to Ford. But there are also a few things that work against NIO. For example, recalls due to production defects would be a much bigger challenge for NIO to overcome than for Ford which can rely on a global service and distribution network. NIO’s valuation is also not without risk as an unexpected slowing of sales growth due to production setbacks would leave a much larger dent in the financials.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来是风险更大的企业，但也是最有希望的企业。政府政策有利于蔚来等电动汽车制造商。与福特相比，蔚来的全球总销售额增长潜力更大，因为它的营收基础较小。但也有一些事情对蔚来不利。例如，与可以依赖全球服务和分销网络的福特相比，由于生产缺陷导致的召回对于蔚来来说将是一个更大的挑战。蔚来的估值也并非没有风险，因为生产受挫导致销售增长意外放缓，将对财务状况造成更大影响。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final verdict</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最终判决</b></blockquote></p><p> NIO is definitely the more “sexy” vehicle maker. Strong adoption and sales growth in China and Europe support NIO. Its super smart BaaS model which decouples vehicle purchase prices from battery costs is genius. You pay a high price for this growth but the market opportunity for NIO is immense.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来绝对是更 “性感 ”的汽车制造商。在中国和欧洲的强劲采用率和销售增长支持了蔚来。其超级智能BaaS模型将车辆购买价格与电池成本脱钩，堪称天才。你为这种增长付出了高昂的代价，但蔚来的市场机会是巨大的。</blockquote></p><p> Ford’s EV sales are booming and the percentage of EV sales will increase as the vehicle maker electrifies its fleet. Ford has a lot of potential in the EV market but since EV sales are still a relatively low percentage of total sales, it will take a long time for Ford to complete its transformation.</p><p><blockquote>福特的电动汽车销量正在蓬勃发展，随着该汽车制造商车队电气化，电动汽车销量的比例也将不断增加。福特在电动汽车市场潜力巨大，但由于电动汽车销量占总销量的比例仍然相对较低，福特需要很长时间才能完成转型。</blockquote></p><p> If you believe in the potential of the global EV market, buy NIO. If you believe in the potential of the global EV market and don’t like much risk, buy Ford.</p><p><blockquote>如果您相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，请购买蔚来。如果你相信全球电动汽车市场的潜力，又不喜欢太大的风险，那就买福特吧。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4436600-ford-or-nio-the-final-verdict\">seekingalpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"F":"福特汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4436600-ford-or-nio-the-final-verdict","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137119316","content_text":"Summary\n\nI am comparing Ford against NIO in different categories.\nThe comparison is intended to improve the understanding of Ford's and NIO's growth potential while highlighting differences in market position and opportunities.\nNIO is growing a lot faster than Ford and the high valuation may be justified.\n\npeterschreiber.media/iStock via Getty Images\nWith Ford (F) launching a major offensive in the market for electric vehicles, Chinese EV maker NIO (NIO) will face one more rival competing for sales in the future. Which vehicle maker offers the best deal based on market opportunity, scale, revenue model, growth prospects and valuation? I will compare Ford against NIO in each category and issue a final verdict at the end.\nFord vs. NIO: The battle for the global electric vehicle market is heating up\nAlthough there is a world of difference between Ford and NIO, both companies are set to go toe-to-toe in the rapidly growing global electric vehicle market. Ford’s fleet is not yet EV-focused but this is going to change: Feeling that the EV race is heating up, Ford said it is accelerating its electrification plan by investing $30B into its EV manufacturing capabilities until 2025. Ford’s previous capital plan called for a $22B investment in zero-emission vehicles. Ford also set an ambitious sales goal: 40% of its global sales will be electric within the next decade and 33% of pickup truck sales. Electric vehicle sales account for just 1% of Ford's sales today. As Ford is phasing out combustion engines, it is set to evolve into an all-electric vehicle maker by 2040.\nMarket opportunity\nIn 2020, 3.2m electric vehicles were sold in the world which represented a small market share of just 4.2%. China, however, was responsible for buying 41% of all electric vehicles in the world in 2020. Chinese buyers purchased 1.3m electric vehicles last year and sales are set to grow fast as Beijing seeks to boost EV adoption. The second largest market for electric vehicles was Europe which accounted for 42% of global EV sales. The US is only the third-largest market for plug-in electric vehicles in the world.\n(Source: Wikipedia)\nChina, by far, is the fastest growing EV market in the world, although Europe is catching up fast, in part due to a legislative efforts to increase adoption of zero-emission passenger vehicles and because of massive investments in a Europe-wide charging station network. NIO is on the cusp of entering the European market in a bid to grow market share in the world’s second-largest EV market before the competition is ready.\nBeijing is a driver behind the electrification of the Chinese auto industry: The government wants to see a twenty percent share of electric vehicles for new car sales by 2025 which will drive EV penetration in NIO’s home market.\n(Source:Schroders)\nTurning to growth projections.\nWith more favorable government policies for EV makers in places like China and Europe, these markets are poised to see the fastest sales growth and the highest EV adoption rates in the world. China is not only the largest market due to population size but is also expected to outperform all other markets in the world in EV sales until 2030.\n(Source:McKinsey)\nSince China has a larger total market size, a higher EV adoption rate, stronger expected sales growth and a more favorable regulatory framework, the winner here would be: NIO.\nScale and manufacturing competence\nFord has a century’s worth of manufacturing experience. But Ford, so far, has only one all-electric vehicle in its product line-up that compares to NIO: The Mustang Mach-E SUV. In 2022, Ford will begin to sell the all-electric F-150 Lightening which builds on the success of Ford’s best-selling pick-up truck. NIO already has a stronger product catalog including the 5-seater ES6 SUV, the 5-seater coupe SUV EC6 and the ES8, a 6-seater and 7-seater full-sized SUV.\nSince NIO is solely focused on producing EVs and occupies a very small and defined niche, the Chinese firm has an advantage as far as EV-manufacturing expertise goes. The question is how long this advantage can last. Ford has extensive experience in building cars and can leverage a global manufacturing base to ramp up EV production faster than any niche EV maker could ever hope to achieve. This makes Ford a very serious rival not only to Tesla (TSLA) in the US, but also to NIO abroad. Ford is accelerating its electrification plans and it has the resources and the ambition to become a leader in EVs within the next decade. Ford’s proposed $30B spending on the electrification of its fleet will accelerate its transformation and turn Ford into a long term threat to other EV makers.\nWinner here: Ford.\nDifferentiation and BaaS revenue model\nBoth Ford and NIO know about the importance of differentiation in a market that will only get more competitive over time, which is why both companies are investing heavily in a related field that can break or solidify dominance in the EV market: Battery technology.\nFord is forming a joint venture with South Korean battery technology company SK Innovation to secure supply of traction battery cells and array modules. The joint venture is meant to accelerate battery deliveries and will produce approximately 60 GWh annually, enough to cover 25% of Ford’s estimated annual energy demand by 2030. NIO is also investing in battery technology and has formed its own joint venture to secure battery supply.\nThe difference to Ford is that NIO’s battery investment strategy revolves around a battery subscription model, also called “battery-as-a-service”, which creates a strong, long term revenue opportunity for the Chinese vehicle maker. Under this “BaaS” model, users who buy a NIO electric vehicle get a 70,000 RMB initial discount, equivalent to $10,800, and can sign up for a monthly subscription to rent a rechargeable 70 kWh battery. Batteries can then be exchanged at one of NIO’s battery-swapping stations which can be found in most big Chinese cities. A battery subscription costs 980 RMB monthly which is the equivalent of $150.\nThe BaaS model has a couple of benefits for both the vehicle maker and the user: Purchasing an electric vehicle from NIO gets a lot more affordable due to the up-front discount and the subscription model ensures that users benefit from advancement in battery technology and better performance over time. Decoupling battery costs from vehicle prices creates an entirely new revenue stream on a subscription basis for NIO. Revenues from “BaaS” subscriptions could be used to increase the density of NIO’s network of charging/replacement stations. The battery subscription model also binds customers to NIO, potentially increasing customer lifetime value.\nFord and NIO are primed to benefit from falling battery costs for electric vehicles as they ramp up capital allocations. As more investments flow into developing more efficient batteries, performance will go up and costs will go down which should drive EV adoption and benefit all EV makers. This is because lower battery prices make EVs more competitive to passenger vehicles with combustion engines. But since NIO is structuring a part of its business model explicitly around battery subscriptions, NIO could benefit more than Ford.\nBattery costs for EVs have decreased 70% since 2014, based on information provided by investment firm Schroders, and are set to decrease more this decade.\n(Source: Schroders)\nThe “BaaS” model is genius and could develop into a $500M a year revenue opportunity for NIO long term. Although Ford is ramping up its investments in battery technology, the winner in this category is: NIO.\nSales growth and valuation\nFord’s sales in May grew 4.1% Y/Y but electrified vehicle sales (including hybrids) surged 184% Y/Y as Ford sold a record 10,364 EVs/hybrids in May. Escape electrified sales and Explorer Hybrid grew sales at 125% and 132% Y/Y showing strong customer uptake. NIO delivered 6,711 vehicles last month including 3,017 ES6s, 1,412 ES8s and 2,282 EC6s. Total Y/Y delivery growth for May was 95.3%.\nFord's sales are fifty-four times larger than NIO's which creates more sales growth and revaluation potential for NIO.\nData by YCharts\nThe difference in valuation between Ford and NIO is like the difference between night and day. This is because Ford is still seen as a mature vehicle maker with expected enterprise sales growth in the low-to-mid digits, despite explosive growth in the EV category. Ford is expected to grow revenues by 33% until FY 2025 (base year: FY 2020) and NIO by 808%!\nDue to these differences in sales growth, NIO is the complete opposite of Ford, at least as far as valuation goes. The Chinese EV-maker is expected to see sales and delivery growth close to 100% this year and since NIO is only dealing in EVs, NIO gets a much higher market-cap-to-sales ratio than Ford.\n(Source: Author)\nNIO has larger risks...\nNIO is the more risky venture, but also the one that offers the most promise. Government policy favors EV-makers like NIO. The potential for total global sales growth is larger for NIO as it operates from a smaller revenue base compared to Ford. But there are also a few things that work against NIO. For example, recalls due to production defects would be a much bigger challenge for NIO to overcome than for Ford which can rely on a global service and distribution network. NIO’s valuation is also not without risk as an unexpected slowing of sales growth due to production setbacks would leave a much larger dent in the financials.\nFinal verdict\nNIO is definitely the more “sexy” vehicle maker. Strong adoption and sales growth in China and Europe support NIO. Its super smart BaaS model which decouples vehicle purchase prices from battery costs is genius. You pay a high price for this growth but the market opportunity for NIO is immense.\nFord’s EV sales are booming and the percentage of EV sales will increase as the vehicle maker electrifies its fleet. Ford has a lot of potential in the EV market but since EV sales are still a relatively low percentage of total sales, it will take a long time for Ford to complete its transformation.\nIf you believe in the potential of the global EV market, buy NIO. If you believe in the potential of the global EV market and don’t like much risk, buy Ford.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"F":0.9,"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":665,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":117303690,"gmtCreate":1623115532210,"gmtModify":1634036792571,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117303690","repostId":"2141342255","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":114098041,"gmtCreate":1623034052183,"gmtModify":1634096018895,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/114098041","repostId":"2141926289","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":318,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144918601,"gmtCreate":1626260479603,"gmtModify":1631891823619,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/144918601","repostId":"2151158165","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151158165","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626259561,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2151158165?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-14 18:46","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate<blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 $1.03 超出预期 $0.77，销售额 $21.50B，低于预期 $21.83B</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151158165","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"-Dow Jones","content":"<p>Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 1.03 美元，超出预期 0.77 美元，销售额 21.50B 美元，低于预期 21.83B 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America Corp reported a jump in second-quarter profit on Wednesday as it released reserves it had set aside last year to cover potential loan losses tied to the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行周三公布第二季度利润大幅增长，因为它释放了去年留出的准备金，以弥补与疫情相关的潜在贷款损失。</blockquote></p><p> The bank’s net income applicable to common shareholders rose to $8.96 billion, or $1.03 per share, from $3.28 billion, or 37 cents per share, a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>该银行普通股股东的净利润从去年同期的 32.8 亿美元（每股 37 美分）增至 89.6 亿美元，即每股 1.03 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts on average had expected a profit of 77 cents per share, according to IBES estimate from Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>根据 IBES 对路孚特的估计，分析师平均预期每股利润为 77 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The Federal Reserve last year brought in ultra-low interest rates to allow for a more rapid recovery from the pandemic-induced recession. Such low rates eat into the income of lenders like Bank of America, which make profit from the difference between what they earn on loans and pay out on deposits.</p><p><blockquote>美联储去年引入了超低利率，以便从大流行引发的衰退中更快地复苏。如此低的利率侵蚀了美国银行等贷款机构的收入，这些机构从贷款收入和存款支出之间的差额中获利。</blockquote></p><p> Strong momentum in job growth and vaccinations against COVID-19 have underpinned a recovery in the broader economy, However, Wall Street’s biggest banks are still expected to feel the pinch from low rates.</p><p><blockquote>就业增长的强劲势头和针对 COVID-19 的疫苗接种支撑了整体经济的复苏，然而，华尔街最大的银行预计仍将感受到低利率带来的压力。</blockquote></p><p> Executives at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co warned on Tuesday that the sunny outlook for the U.S. economy would not make for blockbuster revenues in the short term due to low interest rates, weak loan demand and a slowdown in trading.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通高管周二警告称，由于低利率、贷款需求疲软和贸易放缓，美国经济的乐观前景不会在短期内带来巨额收入。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, released $2.2 billion of reserves in the quarter, reflecting the improved economic outlook. The release, however, was lower than the $2.7 billion it had set aside in the previous quarter.</p><p><blockquote>按资产计算，美国第二大银行美国银行本季度释放了 22 亿美元的准备金，反映出经济前景的改善。然而，此次发行低于上一季度预留的 27 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Overall revenue, net of interest expense, dropped 4% to $21.5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>扣除利息支出后的总收入下降 4% 至 215 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank&nbsp;of&nbsp;America&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;2%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行股价在盘前交易中下跌 2%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/afdc90bc748a5b7b5f8f4aa42de529dc\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"622\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate<blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 $1.03 超出预期 $0.77，销售额 $21.50B，低于预期 $21.83B</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate<blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 $1.03 超出预期 $0.77，销售额 $21.50B，低于预期 $21.83B</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-14 18:46</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行第二季度每股收益 1.03 美元，超出预期 0.77 美元，销售额 21.50B 美元，低于预期 21.83B 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America Corp reported a jump in second-quarter profit on Wednesday as it released reserves it had set aside last year to cover potential loan losses tied to the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行周三公布第二季度利润大幅增长，因为它释放了去年留出的准备金，以弥补与疫情相关的潜在贷款损失。</blockquote></p><p> The bank’s net income applicable to common shareholders rose to $8.96 billion, or $1.03 per share, from $3.28 billion, or 37 cents per share, a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>该银行普通股股东的净利润从去年同期的 32.8 亿美元（每股 37 美分）增至 89.6 亿美元，即每股 1.03 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts on average had expected a profit of 77 cents per share, according to IBES estimate from Refinitiv.</p><p><blockquote>根据 IBES 对路孚特的估计，分析师平均预期每股利润为 77 美分。</blockquote></p><p> The Federal Reserve last year brought in ultra-low interest rates to allow for a more rapid recovery from the pandemic-induced recession. Such low rates eat into the income of lenders like Bank of America, which make profit from the difference between what they earn on loans and pay out on deposits.</p><p><blockquote>美联储去年引入了超低利率，以便从大流行引发的衰退中更快地复苏。如此低的利率侵蚀了美国银行等贷款机构的收入，这些机构从贷款收入和存款支出之间的差额中获利。</blockquote></p><p> Strong momentum in job growth and vaccinations against COVID-19 have underpinned a recovery in the broader economy, However, Wall Street’s biggest banks are still expected to feel the pinch from low rates.</p><p><blockquote>就业增长的强劲势头和针对 COVID-19 的疫苗接种支撑了整体经济的复苏，然而，华尔街最大的银行预计仍将感受到低利率带来的压力。</blockquote></p><p> Executives at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co warned on Tuesday that the sunny outlook for the U.S. economy would not make for blockbuster revenues in the short term due to low interest rates, weak loan demand and a slowdown in trading.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通高管周二警告称，由于低利率、贷款需求疲软和贸易放缓，美国经济的乐观前景不会在短期内带来巨额收入。</blockquote></p><p> Bank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, released $2.2 billion of reserves in the quarter, reflecting the improved economic outlook. The release, however, was lower than the $2.7 billion it had set aside in the previous quarter.</p><p><blockquote>按资产计算，美国第二大银行美国银行本季度释放了 22 亿美元的准备金，反映出经济前景的改善。然而，此次发行低于上一季度预留的 27 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Overall revenue, net of interest expense, dropped 4% to $21.5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>扣除利息支出后的总收入下降 4% 至 215 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Bank&nbsp;of&nbsp;America&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;2%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.</p><p><blockquote>美国银行股价在盘前交易中下跌 2%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/afdc90bc748a5b7b5f8f4aa42de529dc\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"622\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QTWO":"Q2 Holdings Inc","BAC":"美国银行"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151158165","content_text":"Bank of America Q2 EPS $1.03 Beats $0.77 Estimate, Sales $21.50B Miss $21.83B Estimate.\nBank of America Corp reported a jump in second-quarter profit on Wednesday as it released reserves it had set aside last year to cover potential loan losses tied to the pandemic.\nThe bank’s net income applicable to common shareholders rose to $8.96 billion, or $1.03 per share, from $3.28 billion, or 37 cents per share, a year earlier.\nAnalysts on average had expected a profit of 77 cents per share, according to IBES estimate from Refinitiv.\nThe Federal Reserve last year brought in ultra-low interest rates to allow for a more rapid recovery from the pandemic-induced recession. Such low rates eat into the income of lenders like Bank of America, which make profit from the difference between what they earn on loans and pay out on deposits.\nStrong momentum in job growth and vaccinations against COVID-19 have underpinned a recovery in the broader economy, However, Wall Street’s biggest banks are still expected to feel the pinch from low rates.\nExecutives at JPMorgan Chase & Co warned on Tuesday that the sunny outlook for the U.S. economy would not make for blockbuster revenues in the short term due to low interest rates, weak loan demand and a slowdown in trading.\nBank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, released $2.2 billion of reserves in the quarter, reflecting the improved economic outlook. The release, however, was lower than the $2.7 billion it had set aside in the previous quarter.\nOverall revenue, net of interest expense, dropped 4% to $21.5 billion.\nBank of America shares fell 2% in premarket trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QTWO":0.9,"BAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2192,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126568360,"gmtCreate":1624579086450,"gmtModify":1631892906934,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/126568360","repostId":"2146023477","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":687,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176685174,"gmtCreate":1626880219698,"gmtModify":1631891823573,"author":{"id":"3581714557515258","authorId":"3581714557515258","name":"Jltan81","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d954022aff60813e30fd6c679b1641","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581714557515258","authorIdStr":"3581714557515258"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176685174","repostId":"1148130964","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2405,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}