HuatBee的个人主页 - 老虎社区

HuatBee

HuatBee

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

3关注

2粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-06-15

haha

Warren Buffett and the Myth of the ‘Good Billionaire’<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特与“优秀亿万富翁”的神话</blockquote>

2021-06-15

ya

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-15

ya

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-15

too many

Sprinklr Targets $5 Billion Valuation. The IPO Is Next Week.<blockquote>Sprinklr 的目标估值为 50 亿美元。IPO将于下周进行。</blockquote>

2021-06-15

haha

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-14

come on lah. any article from official source wouldn't be a reddit target.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-14

bump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-14

bump

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-14

First!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-14

pls like + comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-13

test

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-13

yay

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-13

jus faze

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-13

the 4th person is ??

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-13

space travel all mumbo jumbo stuffs

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-13

I wan to do a space travel before I die

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-13

meme stocks are too volatile

Meme Stock Soars 1,000% To Lead These Two Top Small Cap Stock Plays<blockquote>Meme 股票飙升 1,000%，领跑这两只顶级小盘股</blockquote>

2021-04-26

yay

Amazon Invests In 9 Renewable Energy Projects In 5 Countries<blockquote>亚马逊在5个国家投资9个可再生能源项目</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3581807635057347","uuid":"3581807635057347","gmtCreate":1618713790218,"gmtModify":1623553210909,"name":"HuatBee","pinyin":"huatbee","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":18,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":184530660,"gmtCreate":1623718095650,"gmtModify":1634029692690,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"haha","listText":"haha","text":"haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184530660","repostId":"1112731941","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112731941","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623716319,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1112731941?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-15 08:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett and the Myth of the ‘Good Billionaire’<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特与“优秀亿万富翁”的神话</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112731941","media":"The New York Times","summary":"Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty\nWarren Buffett appears to be the safest kin","content":"<p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/002912ff5cccdf9eee5a5197b6b82e93\" tg-width=\"1600\" tg-height=\"1600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>纽约时报插图；照片来自盖蒂</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Warren Buffett appears to be the safest kind of billionaire: the good kind. Mr. Buffett is neither Zuckerbergian messiah nor Musky provocateur, neither Bezosist space cadet nor Sacklerian undertaker. He is, or seems to be, quiet, humble, indifferent to money, philanthropic and critical of the system that allowed him to rise. Years ago, a proposed tax increase was named after him.</p><p><blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特似乎是最安全的亿万富翁：善良的那种。巴菲特既不是扎克伯格式的救世主，也不是马斯基式的挑衅者，既不是贝佐斯式的太空学员，也不是萨克勒式的殡仪员。他是，或者看起来是，安静，谦逊，对金钱漠不关心，乐善好施，对让他崛起的制度持批评态度。几年前，一项增税提案就是以他的名字命名的。</blockquote></p><p> It’s easy for people to think: If only members of the Sackler family were more like Mr. Buffett, imagine how many lives would have been saved. If only the billionaires who haven’t signed the Giving Pledge would give away as much as Mr. Buffett has pledged to, imagine the impact on the world. If only more billionaires would make use of the system without feeling the need to pervert it, so many of our troubles would vanish.</p><p><blockquote>人们很容易认为： 如果萨克勒家族的成员更像巴菲特先生，想象一下会挽救多少生命。如果只有那些没有签署捐赠承诺的亿万富翁们能像巴菲特先生承诺的那样捐赠多少钱，想象一下对世界的影响。如果更多的亿万富翁能够利用这个系统而不觉得有必要扭曲它，我们的许多麻烦就会消失。</blockquote></p><p> So I regret to inform you that Mr. Buffett is actually the most dangerous kind of billionaire we have. The worst billionaires are the Good Billionaires. The sort who make it seem like the problem is the distortion of the system when, in fact, the problem is the system.</p><p><blockquote>所以我很遗憾地告诉你，巴菲特先生实际上是我们拥有的最危险的亿万富翁。最差的亿万富翁是优秀的亿万富翁。那种让问题看起来是系统的扭曲，而事实上，问题是系统本身。</blockquote></p><p> Actually malevolent and disastrously negligent plutocrats get most of the attention. And when we hear about these Bad Billionaire exploits, it is possible to conclude from them that the system needs better policing, updated regulations and maybe slightly higher taxes. The system needs to be made to work again.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，恶意和灾难性疏忽的财阀得到了大部分的关注。当我们听说这些糟糕的亿万富翁的漏洞时，有可能从中得出结论，该系统需要更好的监管，更新的法规，也许还需要稍微提高税收。系统需要重新工作。</blockquote></p><p> But as America slouches toward plutocracy, our problem isn’t the virtue level of billionaires. It’s a set of social arrangements that make it possible for anyone to gain and guard and keep so much wealth, even as millions of others lack for food, work, housing, health, connectivity, education, dignity and the occasion to pursue their happiness.</p><p><blockquote>但是，随着美国对财阀统治无动于衷，我们的问题并不在于亿万富翁的美德水平。这是一套社会安排，使任何人都有可能获得、守护和保留如此多的财富，即使还有数百万人缺乏食物、工作、住房、健康、联系、教育、尊严和追求幸福的机会。</blockquote></p><p> There is no way to be a billionaire in America without taking advantage of a system predicated on cruelty, a system whose tax code and labor laws and regulatory apparatus prioritize your needs above most people’s. Even noted Good Billionaire Mr. Buffett has profited from Coca-Cola’s sugary drinks, Amazon’s union busting, Chevron’s oil drilling, Clayton Homes’s predatory loans and, as the country learned recently, the failure to tax billionaires on their wealth.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，要想成为亿万富翁，就不可能不利用一个建立在残酷基础上的制度，这个制度的税法、劳动法和监管机构将你的需求置于大多数人的需求之上。就连著名的亿万富翁巴菲特先生也从可口可乐的含糖饮料、亚马逊的工会破裂、雪佛龙的石油钻探、克莱顿房屋公司的掠夺性贷款以及《国家》最近了解到的亿万富翁未能对其财富征税中获利。</blockquote></p><p> The Good Billionaire myth took a hard blow in recent days when Mr. Buffett won a dubious distinction. A&nbsp;staggering exposé&nbsp;published by ProPublica revealed just how little the biggest plutocrats pay in taxes, despite mounting piles of wealth. And at the very top of that list of plutocrats — many of them with troubled reputations — was the cleanest, grandfatherliest plutocrat of them all: Mr. Buffett.</p><p><blockquote>最近几天，当巴菲特赢得一项可疑的荣誉时，“好亿万富翁”的神话受到了沉重打击。ProPublica 发表的一篇令人震惊的揭露揭示了最大的财阀尽管拥有越来越多的财富，但缴纳的税款是多么少。在这份财阀名单的最顶端——其中许多人声誉不佳——是他们中最干净、最像祖父的财阀：巴菲特先生。</blockquote></p><p> ProPublica’s story was unusual in that, for once, it was the Good Billionaire at the top of the naughty list. This was helpful, because it served to indict the system that makes him possible, even when it is working perfectly, wholly lawfully.</p><p><blockquote>ProPublica 的故事不同寻常，因为这一次，它是淘气榜榜首的亿万富翁。这是有帮助的，因为它起到了起诉使他成为可能的系统的作用，即使它运行得非常完美，完全合法。</blockquote></p><p> From 2014 to 2018, Mr. Buffett’s wealth soared by $24.3 billion, according to ProPublica. (To underline, this is just the amount the fortune grew.) The amount of taxes Mr. Buffett paid over this period? $23.7 million. If middle-class Americans in their 40s enjoyed such a low effective tax rate, they would have paid a few dozen bucks per household over this same time period. Instead, as the ProPublica story notes, they paid around $62,000.</p><p><blockquote>根据 ProPublica 的数据，从 2014 年到 2018 年，巴菲特先生的财富飙升了 243 亿美元。（强调一下，这只是财富增长的金额。）巴菲特先生在此期间缴纳了多少税？2370万美元。如果40多岁的美国中产阶级享受如此低的有效税率，他们将在同一时期为每个家庭支付几十美元。相反，正如ProPublica的报道所指出的，他们支付了大约62,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> Imagine if Mr. Buffett had to pay the same fraction of the growth of his net worth that regular people do. Taxing that money could have helped pay for bridge repairs, mammograms, and free day care. More important — and this isn’t said enough — there is intrinsic value in shrinking gargantuan fortunes. The sway plutocrats have over public life is inconsistent with a one person, one vote democracy.</p><p><blockquote>想象一下，如果巴菲特先生不得不支付与普通人相同的净资产增长比例。对这笔钱征税可以帮助支付桥梁维修、乳房x光检查和免费日托费用。更重要的是--这一点还不够--缩小巨额财富具有内在价值。财阀对公共生活的影响与一人一票的民主不一致。</blockquote></p><p> The important point here is that Mr. Buffett’s tax payments as detailed by ProPublica are fully legal. Though Mr. Buffett has called for changing the tax system, while we have the one we have, he will continue to benefit from the madness of taxing billionaires for their income, rather than their wealth, when their income is pretty much just a number they can construct.</p><p><blockquote>这里重要的一点是，ProPublica 详细介绍的巴菲特先生的纳税情况是完全合法的。尽管巴菲特呼吁改变税收制度，但当我们有我们现有的税收制度时，他将继续从对亿万富翁的收入而不是财富征税的疯狂行为中受益，而他们的收入几乎只是一个他们可以构建的数字。</blockquote></p><p> I asked Mr. Buffett last week, via his longtime secretary, Debbie Bosanek, if he could think of even one tax or accounting practice that he has come to regret. Sure, he may have followed the letter of the law. But was there any aspect of his patriotism or humanity that left him feeling guilty for hoarding so much untaxed when regular people pay so much in taxes? Though Ms. Bosanek responded to an initial inquiry, she declined to offer any such examples.</p><p><blockquote>上周，我通过巴菲特的长期秘书黛比·博萨内克问他，他是否能想到哪怕一个他后悔的税务或会计做法。当然，他可能遵守了法律条文。但是，当普通人缴纳如此多的税款时，他的爱国主义或人性是否有任何方面让他为囤积如此多的未纳税而感到内疚？尽管Bosanek女士对初步询问作出了答复，但她拒绝提供任何此类例子。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a long statement last week, Mr. Buffett&nbsp;defended himself&nbsp;by pointing to his long advocacy for a fairer taxation system, and then he immediately told on himself by undermining the very idea of taxes in the same letter. “I believe the money will be of more use to society if disbursed philanthropically than if it is used to slightly reduce an ever-increasing U.S. debt.”</p><p><blockquote>在上周的一份长篇声明中，巴菲特为自己辩护，指出他长期以来主张建立一个更公平的税收制度，然后他立即在同一封信中破坏了税收的概念。“我相信，如果这笔钱用于慈善事业，对社会的益处将大于用于略微减少不断增加的美国债务”。</blockquote></p><p> In other words: I believe in higher income taxes on people like me, but I’m highly organized to avoid having income to report, and I don’t really believe in taxes because I think I should decide how these surplus resources are spent.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说： 我相信对像我这样的人征收更高的所得税，但我非常有条理地避免有收入要申报，而且我并不真正相信税收，因为我认为我应该决定如何使用这些盈余资源。</blockquote></p><p> And this points to another way in which the Good Billionaire is hard to deal with. The crooks and the scoundrels and the people manifestly looking for quick P.R. highs come to philanthropy for the marketing payoff. When Goldman Sachs announces a new initiative on fighting the racial wealth gap despite having done little to repair the damage it did to Black homeowners in contributing to the 2008 financial meltdown, some may be fooled, but, more and more, many are not.</p><p><blockquote>这指向了优秀的亿万富翁难以应对的另一种方式。骗子、恶棍和明显寻求快速公关的人来到慈善事业是为了营销回报。当高盛宣布一项消除种族贫富差距的新举措时，尽管它在修复2008年金融危机中对黑人房主造成的损害方面几乎没有采取任何措施，有些人可能会被愚弄，但越来越多的人没有被愚弄。</blockquote></p><p> Supposed Good Billionaires like Mr. Buffett and his friend Bill Gates are more complicated because they give real money. They may benefit from marketing but also seem to many people to be motivated by more than that, and they apply their smarts to the work.</p><p><blockquote>像巴菲特和他的朋友比尔盖茨这样的所谓优秀的亿万富翁更复杂，因为他们给的是真金白银。他们可能会从营销中受益，但似乎许多人也会受到更多的激励，他们会将自己的智慧运用到工作中。</blockquote></p><p> Yet because of this, it is often the Good Billionaires who end up with the most illegitimate influence over public life. No one is asking members of the Sackler family for public health advice. But Mr. Gates has become a major policy voice on vaccines despite holding no elected position. Mr. Buffett, for his part, has shied away from that kind of lane hopping and richsplaining, but in donating his fortune to Mr. Gates’s foundation he has pumped up that undemocratic influence.</p><p><blockquote>然而，正因为如此，往往是优秀的亿万富翁最终对公共生活产生了最不正当的影响。没有人向萨克勒家族的成员寻求公共卫生建议。但是盖茨先生已经成为疫苗的主要政策代言人，尽管他没有当选职位。巴菲特先生则回避了这种跳槽和炫富的做法，但通过将自己的财富捐赠给盖茨先生的基金会，他放大了这种不民主的影响力。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Buffett is almost the perfectly made billionaire for this moment in which, at last, many Americans are beginning to question not only corruptions of the system but the matter of whether billionaires should exist at all. He doesn’t do the things the worst of them do. He isn’t in it for what they’re in it for. He clearly must care about money, but he also kind of doesn’t care about money. Even in his generosity, he has avoided the imperial lording over that others cannot resist.</p><p><blockquote>目前，巴菲特几乎是完美的亿万富翁，在这个时刻，许多美国人终于开始质疑这个体系的腐败，以及亿万富翁是否应该存在的问题。他不会做他们中最坏的人做的事。他不是为了他们的目的而参与的。他显然肯定在乎钱，但他也有点不在乎钱。即使在他的慷慨中，他也避免了其他人无法抗拒的帝国统治。</blockquote></p><p> And this is what makes him so troubling, because through him we are tempted into believing that a system can be defended that allows a man to accumulate more than $100 billion while people are sleeping, in hock to him, in his mobile homes, shortening their lives with the beverages he’s invested in, scampering around the warehouses whose nonunion status has redounded to his money pile.</p><p><blockquote>这就是他如此令人不安的原因，因为通过他，我们很容易相信，一个制度是可以捍卫的，这个制度允许一个人在人们睡觉时积累超过 1000 亿美元，在他的活动房屋里，用他投资的饮料缩短他们的寿命，在仓库里跑来跑去，而这些仓库的非工会身份已经增加到他的钱堆里。</blockquote></p><p> It can’t. And who keeps us from seeing that simple, stark truth more effectively, more perniciously, than the Good Billionaire?</p><p><blockquote>它不能。谁比善良的亿万富翁更有效地、更有害地阻止我们看到这个简单、赤裸裸的真相？</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1608616134662","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett and the Myth of the ‘Good Billionaire’<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特与“优秀亿万富翁”的神话</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett and the Myth of the ‘Good Billionaire’<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特与“优秀亿万富翁”的神话</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The New York Times</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 08:18</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/002912ff5cccdf9eee5a5197b6b82e93\" tg-width=\"1600\" tg-height=\"1600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>纽约时报插图；照片来自盖蒂</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Warren Buffett appears to be the safest kind of billionaire: the good kind. Mr. Buffett is neither Zuckerbergian messiah nor Musky provocateur, neither Bezosist space cadet nor Sacklerian undertaker. He is, or seems to be, quiet, humble, indifferent to money, philanthropic and critical of the system that allowed him to rise. Years ago, a proposed tax increase was named after him.</p><p><blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特似乎是最安全的亿万富翁：善良的那种。巴菲特既不是扎克伯格式的救世主，也不是马斯基式的挑衅者，既不是贝佐斯式的太空学员，也不是萨克勒式的殡仪员。他是，或者看起来是，安静，谦逊，对金钱漠不关心，乐善好施，对让他崛起的制度持批评态度。几年前，一项增税提案就是以他的名字命名的。</blockquote></p><p> It’s easy for people to think: If only members of the Sackler family were more like Mr. Buffett, imagine how many lives would have been saved. If only the billionaires who haven’t signed the Giving Pledge would give away as much as Mr. Buffett has pledged to, imagine the impact on the world. If only more billionaires would make use of the system without feeling the need to pervert it, so many of our troubles would vanish.</p><p><blockquote>人们很容易认为： 如果萨克勒家族的成员更像巴菲特先生，想象一下会挽救多少生命。如果只有那些没有签署捐赠承诺的亿万富翁们能像巴菲特先生承诺的那样捐赠多少钱，想象一下对世界的影响。如果更多的亿万富翁能够利用这个系统而不觉得有必要扭曲它，我们的许多麻烦就会消失。</blockquote></p><p> So I regret to inform you that Mr. Buffett is actually the most dangerous kind of billionaire we have. The worst billionaires are the Good Billionaires. The sort who make it seem like the problem is the distortion of the system when, in fact, the problem is the system.</p><p><blockquote>所以我很遗憾地告诉你，巴菲特先生实际上是我们拥有的最危险的亿万富翁。最差的亿万富翁是优秀的亿万富翁。那种让问题看起来是系统的扭曲，而事实上，问题是系统本身。</blockquote></p><p> Actually malevolent and disastrously negligent plutocrats get most of the attention. And when we hear about these Bad Billionaire exploits, it is possible to conclude from them that the system needs better policing, updated regulations and maybe slightly higher taxes. The system needs to be made to work again.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，恶意和灾难性疏忽的财阀得到了大部分的关注。当我们听说这些糟糕的亿万富翁的漏洞时，有可能从中得出结论，该系统需要更好的监管，更新的法规，也许还需要稍微提高税收。系统需要重新工作。</blockquote></p><p> But as America slouches toward plutocracy, our problem isn’t the virtue level of billionaires. It’s a set of social arrangements that make it possible for anyone to gain and guard and keep so much wealth, even as millions of others lack for food, work, housing, health, connectivity, education, dignity and the occasion to pursue their happiness.</p><p><blockquote>但是，随着美国对财阀统治无动于衷，我们的问题并不在于亿万富翁的美德水平。这是一套社会安排，使任何人都有可能获得、守护和保留如此多的财富，即使还有数百万人缺乏食物、工作、住房、健康、联系、教育、尊严和追求幸福的机会。</blockquote></p><p> There is no way to be a billionaire in America without taking advantage of a system predicated on cruelty, a system whose tax code and labor laws and regulatory apparatus prioritize your needs above most people’s. Even noted Good Billionaire Mr. Buffett has profited from Coca-Cola’s sugary drinks, Amazon’s union busting, Chevron’s oil drilling, Clayton Homes’s predatory loans and, as the country learned recently, the failure to tax billionaires on their wealth.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，要想成为亿万富翁，就不可能不利用一个建立在残酷基础上的制度，这个制度的税法、劳动法和监管机构将你的需求置于大多数人的需求之上。就连著名的亿万富翁巴菲特先生也从可口可乐的含糖饮料、亚马逊的工会破裂、雪佛龙的石油钻探、克莱顿房屋公司的掠夺性贷款以及《国家》最近了解到的亿万富翁未能对其财富征税中获利。</blockquote></p><p> The Good Billionaire myth took a hard blow in recent days when Mr. Buffett won a dubious distinction. A&nbsp;staggering exposé&nbsp;published by ProPublica revealed just how little the biggest plutocrats pay in taxes, despite mounting piles of wealth. And at the very top of that list of plutocrats — many of them with troubled reputations — was the cleanest, grandfatherliest plutocrat of them all: Mr. Buffett.</p><p><blockquote>最近几天，当巴菲特赢得一项可疑的荣誉时，“好亿万富翁”的神话受到了沉重打击。ProPublica 发表的一篇令人震惊的揭露揭示了最大的财阀尽管拥有越来越多的财富，但缴纳的税款是多么少。在这份财阀名单的最顶端——其中许多人声誉不佳——是他们中最干净、最像祖父的财阀：巴菲特先生。</blockquote></p><p> ProPublica’s story was unusual in that, for once, it was the Good Billionaire at the top of the naughty list. This was helpful, because it served to indict the system that makes him possible, even when it is working perfectly, wholly lawfully.</p><p><blockquote>ProPublica 的故事不同寻常，因为这一次，它是淘气榜榜首的亿万富翁。这是有帮助的，因为它起到了起诉使他成为可能的系统的作用，即使它运行得非常完美，完全合法。</blockquote></p><p> From 2014 to 2018, Mr. Buffett’s wealth soared by $24.3 billion, according to ProPublica. (To underline, this is just the amount the fortune grew.) The amount of taxes Mr. Buffett paid over this period? $23.7 million. If middle-class Americans in their 40s enjoyed such a low effective tax rate, they would have paid a few dozen bucks per household over this same time period. Instead, as the ProPublica story notes, they paid around $62,000.</p><p><blockquote>根据 ProPublica 的数据，从 2014 年到 2018 年，巴菲特先生的财富飙升了 243 亿美元。（强调一下，这只是财富增长的金额。）巴菲特先生在此期间缴纳了多少税？2370万美元。如果40多岁的美国中产阶级享受如此低的有效税率，他们将在同一时期为每个家庭支付几十美元。相反，正如ProPublica的报道所指出的，他们支付了大约62,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> Imagine if Mr. Buffett had to pay the same fraction of the growth of his net worth that regular people do. Taxing that money could have helped pay for bridge repairs, mammograms, and free day care. More important — and this isn’t said enough — there is intrinsic value in shrinking gargantuan fortunes. The sway plutocrats have over public life is inconsistent with a one person, one vote democracy.</p><p><blockquote>想象一下，如果巴菲特先生不得不支付与普通人相同的净资产增长比例。对这笔钱征税可以帮助支付桥梁维修、乳房x光检查和免费日托费用。更重要的是--这一点还不够--缩小巨额财富具有内在价值。财阀对公共生活的影响与一人一票的民主不一致。</blockquote></p><p> The important point here is that Mr. Buffett’s tax payments as detailed by ProPublica are fully legal. Though Mr. Buffett has called for changing the tax system, while we have the one we have, he will continue to benefit from the madness of taxing billionaires for their income, rather than their wealth, when their income is pretty much just a number they can construct.</p><p><blockquote>这里重要的一点是，ProPublica 详细介绍的巴菲特先生的纳税情况是完全合法的。尽管巴菲特呼吁改变税收制度，但当我们有我们现有的税收制度时，他将继续从对亿万富翁的收入而不是财富征税的疯狂行为中受益，而他们的收入几乎只是一个他们可以构建的数字。</blockquote></p><p> I asked Mr. Buffett last week, via his longtime secretary, Debbie Bosanek, if he could think of even one tax or accounting practice that he has come to regret. Sure, he may have followed the letter of the law. But was there any aspect of his patriotism or humanity that left him feeling guilty for hoarding so much untaxed when regular people pay so much in taxes? Though Ms. Bosanek responded to an initial inquiry, she declined to offer any such examples.</p><p><blockquote>上周，我通过巴菲特的长期秘书黛比·博萨内克问他，他是否能想到哪怕一个他后悔的税务或会计做法。当然，他可能遵守了法律条文。但是，当普通人缴纳如此多的税款时，他的爱国主义或人性是否有任何方面让他为囤积如此多的未纳税而感到内疚？尽管Bosanek女士对初步询问作出了答复，但她拒绝提供任何此类例子。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a long statement last week, Mr. Buffett&nbsp;defended himself&nbsp;by pointing to his long advocacy for a fairer taxation system, and then he immediately told on himself by undermining the very idea of taxes in the same letter. “I believe the money will be of more use to society if disbursed philanthropically than if it is used to slightly reduce an ever-increasing U.S. debt.”</p><p><blockquote>在上周的一份长篇声明中，巴菲特为自己辩护，指出他长期以来主张建立一个更公平的税收制度，然后他立即在同一封信中破坏了税收的概念。“我相信，如果这笔钱用于慈善事业，对社会的益处将大于用于略微减少不断增加的美国债务”。</blockquote></p><p> In other words: I believe in higher income taxes on people like me, but I’m highly organized to avoid having income to report, and I don’t really believe in taxes because I think I should decide how these surplus resources are spent.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说： 我相信对像我这样的人征收更高的所得税，但我非常有条理地避免有收入要申报，而且我并不真正相信税收，因为我认为我应该决定如何使用这些盈余资源。</blockquote></p><p> And this points to another way in which the Good Billionaire is hard to deal with. The crooks and the scoundrels and the people manifestly looking for quick P.R. highs come to philanthropy for the marketing payoff. When Goldman Sachs announces a new initiative on fighting the racial wealth gap despite having done little to repair the damage it did to Black homeowners in contributing to the 2008 financial meltdown, some may be fooled, but, more and more, many are not.</p><p><blockquote>这指向了优秀的亿万富翁难以应对的另一种方式。骗子、恶棍和明显寻求快速公关的人来到慈善事业是为了营销回报。当高盛宣布一项消除种族贫富差距的新举措时，尽管它在修复2008年金融危机中对黑人房主造成的损害方面几乎没有采取任何措施，有些人可能会被愚弄，但越来越多的人没有被愚弄。</blockquote></p><p> Supposed Good Billionaires like Mr. Buffett and his friend Bill Gates are more complicated because they give real money. They may benefit from marketing but also seem to many people to be motivated by more than that, and they apply their smarts to the work.</p><p><blockquote>像巴菲特和他的朋友比尔盖茨这样的所谓优秀的亿万富翁更复杂，因为他们给的是真金白银。他们可能会从营销中受益，但似乎许多人也会受到更多的激励，他们会将自己的智慧运用到工作中。</blockquote></p><p> Yet because of this, it is often the Good Billionaires who end up with the most illegitimate influence over public life. No one is asking members of the Sackler family for public health advice. But Mr. Gates has become a major policy voice on vaccines despite holding no elected position. Mr. Buffett, for his part, has shied away from that kind of lane hopping and richsplaining, but in donating his fortune to Mr. Gates’s foundation he has pumped up that undemocratic influence.</p><p><blockquote>然而，正因为如此，往往是优秀的亿万富翁最终对公共生活产生了最不正当的影响。没有人向萨克勒家族的成员寻求公共卫生建议。但是盖茨先生已经成为疫苗的主要政策代言人，尽管他没有当选职位。巴菲特先生则回避了这种跳槽和炫富的做法，但通过将自己的财富捐赠给盖茨先生的基金会，他放大了这种不民主的影响力。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Buffett is almost the perfectly made billionaire for this moment in which, at last, many Americans are beginning to question not only corruptions of the system but the matter of whether billionaires should exist at all. He doesn’t do the things the worst of them do. He isn’t in it for what they’re in it for. He clearly must care about money, but he also kind of doesn’t care about money. Even in his generosity, he has avoided the imperial lording over that others cannot resist.</p><p><blockquote>目前，巴菲特几乎是完美的亿万富翁，在这个时刻，许多美国人终于开始质疑这个体系的腐败，以及亿万富翁是否应该存在的问题。他不会做他们中最坏的人做的事。他不是为了他们的目的而参与的。他显然肯定在乎钱，但他也有点不在乎钱。即使在他的慷慨中，他也避免了其他人无法抗拒的帝国统治。</blockquote></p><p> And this is what makes him so troubling, because through him we are tempted into believing that a system can be defended that allows a man to accumulate more than $100 billion while people are sleeping, in hock to him, in his mobile homes, shortening their lives with the beverages he’s invested in, scampering around the warehouses whose nonunion status has redounded to his money pile.</p><p><blockquote>这就是他如此令人不安的原因，因为通过他，我们很容易相信，一个制度是可以捍卫的，这个制度允许一个人在人们睡觉时积累超过 1000 亿美元，在他的活动房屋里，用他投资的饮料缩短他们的寿命，在仓库里跑来跑去，而这些仓库的非工会身份已经增加到他的钱堆里。</blockquote></p><p> It can’t. And who keeps us from seeing that simple, stark truth more effectively, more perniciously, than the Good Billionaire?</p><p><blockquote>它不能。谁比善良的亿万富翁更有效地、更有害地阻止我们看到这个简单、赤裸裸的真相？</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/13/opinion/warren-buffett-billionaire-taxes.html?searchResultPosition=1\">The New York Times</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/13/opinion/warren-buffett-billionaire-taxes.html?searchResultPosition=1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112731941","content_text":"Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty\nWarren Buffett appears to be the safest kind of billionaire: the good kind. Mr. Buffett is neither Zuckerbergian messiah nor Musky provocateur, neither Bezosist space cadet nor Sacklerian undertaker. He is, or seems to be, quiet, humble, indifferent to money, philanthropic and critical of the system that allowed him to rise. Years ago, a proposed tax increase was named after him.\nIt’s easy for people to think: If only members of the Sackler family were more like Mr. Buffett, imagine how many lives would have been saved. If only the billionaires who haven’t signed the Giving Pledge would give away as much as Mr. Buffett has pledged to, imagine the impact on the world. If only more billionaires would make use of the system without feeling the need to pervert it, so many of our troubles would vanish.\nSo I regret to inform you that Mr. Buffett is actually the most dangerous kind of billionaire we have. The worst billionaires are the Good Billionaires. The sort who make it seem like the problem is the distortion of the system when, in fact, the problem is the system.\nActually malevolent and disastrously negligent plutocrats get most of the attention. And when we hear about these Bad Billionaire exploits, it is possible to conclude from them that the system needs better policing, updated regulations and maybe slightly higher taxes. The system needs to be made to work again.\nBut as America slouches toward plutocracy, our problem isn’t the virtue level of billionaires. It’s a set of social arrangements that make it possible for anyone to gain and guard and keep so much wealth, even as millions of others lack for food, work, housing, health, connectivity, education, dignity and the occasion to pursue their happiness.\nThere is no way to be a billionaire in America without taking advantage of a system predicated on cruelty, a system whose tax code and labor laws and regulatory apparatus prioritize your needs above most people’s. Even noted Good Billionaire Mr. Buffett has profited from Coca-Cola’s sugary drinks, Amazon’s union busting, Chevron’s oil drilling, Clayton Homes’s predatory loans and, as the country learned recently, the failure to tax billionaires on their wealth.\nThe Good Billionaire myth took a hard blow in recent days when Mr. Buffett won a dubious distinction. A staggering exposé published by ProPublica revealed just how little the biggest plutocrats pay in taxes, despite mounting piles of wealth. And at the very top of that list of plutocrats — many of them with troubled reputations — was the cleanest, grandfatherliest plutocrat of them all: Mr. Buffett.\nProPublica’s story was unusual in that, for once, it was the Good Billionaire at the top of the naughty list. This was helpful, because it served to indict the system that makes him possible, even when it is working perfectly, wholly lawfully.\nFrom 2014 to 2018, Mr. Buffett’s wealth soared by $24.3 billion, according to ProPublica. (To underline, this is just the amount the fortune grew.) The amount of taxes Mr. Buffett paid over this period? $23.7 million. If middle-class Americans in their 40s enjoyed such a low effective tax rate, they would have paid a few dozen bucks per household over this same time period. Instead, as the ProPublica story notes, they paid around $62,000.\nImagine if Mr. Buffett had to pay the same fraction of the growth of his net worth that regular people do. Taxing that money could have helped pay for bridge repairs, mammograms, and free day care. More important — and this isn’t said enough — there is intrinsic value in shrinking gargantuan fortunes. The sway plutocrats have over public life is inconsistent with a one person, one vote democracy.\nThe important point here is that Mr. Buffett’s tax payments as detailed by ProPublica are fully legal. Though Mr. Buffett has called for changing the tax system, while we have the one we have, he will continue to benefit from the madness of taxing billionaires for their income, rather than their wealth, when their income is pretty much just a number they can construct.\nI asked Mr. Buffett last week, via his longtime secretary, Debbie Bosanek, if he could think of even one tax or accounting practice that he has come to regret. Sure, he may have followed the letter of the law. But was there any aspect of his patriotism or humanity that left him feeling guilty for hoarding so much untaxed when regular people pay so much in taxes? Though Ms. Bosanek responded to an initial inquiry, she declined to offer any such examples.\nIn a long statement last week, Mr. Buffett defended himself by pointing to his long advocacy for a fairer taxation system, and then he immediately told on himself by undermining the very idea of taxes in the same letter. “I believe the money will be of more use to society if disbursed philanthropically than if it is used to slightly reduce an ever-increasing U.S. debt.”\nIn other words: I believe in higher income taxes on people like me, but I’m highly organized to avoid having income to report, and I don’t really believe in taxes because I think I should decide how these surplus resources are spent.\nAnd this points to another way in which the Good Billionaire is hard to deal with. The crooks and the scoundrels and the people manifestly looking for quick P.R. highs come to philanthropy for the marketing payoff. When Goldman Sachs announces a new initiative on fighting the racial wealth gap despite having done little to repair the damage it did to Black homeowners in contributing to the 2008 financial meltdown, some may be fooled, but, more and more, many are not.\nSupposed Good Billionaires like Mr. Buffett and his friend Bill Gates are more complicated because they give real money. They may benefit from marketing but also seem to many people to be motivated by more than that, and they apply their smarts to the work.\nYet because of this, it is often the Good Billionaires who end up with the most illegitimate influence over public life. No one is asking members of the Sackler family for public health advice. But Mr. Gates has become a major policy voice on vaccines despite holding no elected position. Mr. Buffett, for his part, has shied away from that kind of lane hopping and richsplaining, but in donating his fortune to Mr. Gates’s foundation he has pumped up that undemocratic influence.\nMr. Buffett is almost the perfectly made billionaire for this moment in which, at last, many Americans are beginning to question not only corruptions of the system but the matter of whether billionaires should exist at all. He doesn’t do the things the worst of them do. He isn’t in it for what they’re in it for. He clearly must care about money, but he also kind of doesn’t care about money. Even in his generosity, he has avoided the imperial lording over that others cannot resist.\nAnd this is what makes him so troubling, because through him we are tempted into believing that a system can be defended that allows a man to accumulate more than $100 billion while people are sleeping, in hock to him, in his mobile homes, shortening their lives with the beverages he’s invested in, scampering around the warehouses whose nonunion status has redounded to his money pile.\nIt can’t. And who keeps us from seeing that simple, stark truth more effectively, more perniciously, than the Good Billionaire?","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BRK.B":0.9,"BRK.A":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2290,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184595702,"gmtCreate":1623718047106,"gmtModify":1634029694928,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184595702","repostId":"1186461856","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1878,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184592779,"gmtCreate":1623718028991,"gmtModify":1634029695518,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184592779","repostId":"2143733744","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1419,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184592076,"gmtCreate":1623718011195,"gmtModify":1634029696602,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"too many","listText":"too many","text":"too many","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184592076","repostId":"1114252405","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114252405","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623717784,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1114252405?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-15 08:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sprinklr Targets $5 Billion Valuation. The IPO Is Next Week.<blockquote>Sprinklr 的目标估值为 50 亿美元。IPO将于下周进行。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114252405","media":"Barrons","summary":"Sprinklr’s valuation could hit $5 billion when the tech start-up makes its public equities market de","content":"<p>Sprinklr’s valuation could hit $5 billion when the tech start-up makes its public equities market debut next week.</p><p><blockquote>当这家科技初创公司下周首次公开募股时，Sprinklr 的估值可能会达到 50 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday, Sprinklr set terms for its initial public offering. The software company, backed by private-equity firm Hellman &amp; Friedman, plans to offer 19 million shares at $18 to $20 each. It will trade under the ticker CXM on the New York Stock Exchange.</p><p><blockquote>周一，Sprinklr 为其首次公开募股设定了条款。这家由私募股权公司 Hellman &amp; Friedman 支持的软件公司计划以每股 18 至 20 美元的价格发行 1900 万股股票。它将在纽约证券交易所交易，股票代码为 CXM。</blockquote></p><p> Sprinklr&nbsp;confidentially filedfor its IPO in March. Fourteen investment banks are listed on the deal.Morgan Stanley,JP Morgan,Citigroup,Barclays&nbsp;and Wells Fargo Securities are lead underwriters.</p><p><blockquote>Sprinklr 于三月份秘密申请了 IPO。14家投资银行参与了这笔交易.摩根士丹利、摩根大通、花旗集团、巴克莱银行和富国银行证券是主承销商。</blockquote></p><p> The New York company is scheduled to price its deal on June 22, and would trade the next day, a person familiar with the situation said. At $20 a share, Sprinklr’s valuation would reach $5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>一位知情人士称，这家纽约公司计划于 6 月 22 日为交易定价，并将于第二天进行交易。按每股 20 美元计算，Sprinklr 的估值将达到 50 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2009, Sprinklr provides a customer-experience management platform that assists companies in managing their digital identities—in advertising, marketing, research and on social media. The company has 1,021 customers, including McDonald’s (ticker: MCD),Microsoft(MSFT), L’Oréal and&nbsp;Verizon Communications(VZ).</p><p><blockquote>Sprinklr成立于2009年，提供一个客户体验管理平台，帮助公司在广告、营销、研究和社交媒体上管理他们的数字身份。该公司拥有 1,021 家客户，包括麦当劳（股票代码：MCD）、微软（MSFT）、欧莱雅和 Verizon Communications（VZ）。</blockquote></p><p> Sprinklr generates revenue from the sale of subscriptions to its Unified CXM cloud-based software platform and other services. Revenue jumped 19% to nearly $111 million for the quarter ended April 30,the prospectus said.</p><p><blockquote>Sprinklr 通过销售其统一的 CXM 云软件平台和其他服务的订阅来获得收入。招股说明书称，截至 4 月 30 日的季度收入增长 19%，达到近 1.11 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Sprinklr, however, isn’t profitable. Losses widened to $14.7 million for the quarter ended April 30 from $11.2 million for the same period in 2020. The company has 2,469 employees.</p><p><blockquote>然而，Sprinklr 并不盈利。截至 4 月 30 日的季度，亏损从 2020 年同期的 1,120 万美元扩大至 1,470 万美元。该公司有2469名员工。</blockquote></p><p> Hellman &amp; Friedman&nbsp;invested $200 million&nbsp;in Sprinklr last year at a $2.7 billion valuation. The private-equity firm will have nearly 25% voting power after the offering.</p><p><blockquote>Hellman &amp; Friedman 去年以 27 亿美元的估值向 Sprinklr 投资了 2 亿美元。发行后，这家私募股权公司将拥有近25%的投票权。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sprinklr Targets $5 Billion Valuation. The IPO Is Next Week.<blockquote>Sprinklr 的目标估值为 50 亿美元。IPO将于下周进行。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSprinklr Targets $5 Billion Valuation. The IPO Is Next Week.<blockquote>Sprinklr 的目标估值为 50 亿美元。IPO将于下周进行。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 08:43</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Sprinklr’s valuation could hit $5 billion when the tech start-up makes its public equities market debut next week.</p><p><blockquote>当这家科技初创公司下周首次公开募股时，Sprinklr 的估值可能会达到 50 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday, Sprinklr set terms for its initial public offering. The software company, backed by private-equity firm Hellman &amp; Friedman, plans to offer 19 million shares at $18 to $20 each. It will trade under the ticker CXM on the New York Stock Exchange.</p><p><blockquote>周一，Sprinklr 为其首次公开募股设定了条款。这家由私募股权公司 Hellman &amp; Friedman 支持的软件公司计划以每股 18 至 20 美元的价格发行 1900 万股股票。它将在纽约证券交易所交易，股票代码为 CXM。</blockquote></p><p> Sprinklr&nbsp;confidentially filedfor its IPO in March. Fourteen investment banks are listed on the deal.Morgan Stanley,JP Morgan,Citigroup,Barclays&nbsp;and Wells Fargo Securities are lead underwriters.</p><p><blockquote>Sprinklr 于三月份秘密申请了 IPO。14家投资银行参与了这笔交易.摩根士丹利、摩根大通、花旗集团、巴克莱银行和富国银行证券是主承销商。</blockquote></p><p> The New York company is scheduled to price its deal on June 22, and would trade the next day, a person familiar with the situation said. At $20 a share, Sprinklr’s valuation would reach $5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>一位知情人士称，这家纽约公司计划于 6 月 22 日为交易定价，并将于第二天进行交易。按每股 20 美元计算，Sprinklr 的估值将达到 50 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2009, Sprinklr provides a customer-experience management platform that assists companies in managing their digital identities—in advertising, marketing, research and on social media. The company has 1,021 customers, including McDonald’s (ticker: MCD),Microsoft(MSFT), L’Oréal and&nbsp;Verizon Communications(VZ).</p><p><blockquote>Sprinklr成立于2009年，提供一个客户体验管理平台，帮助公司在广告、营销、研究和社交媒体上管理他们的数字身份。该公司拥有 1,021 家客户，包括麦当劳（股票代码：MCD）、微软（MSFT）、欧莱雅和 Verizon Communications（VZ）。</blockquote></p><p> Sprinklr generates revenue from the sale of subscriptions to its Unified CXM cloud-based software platform and other services. Revenue jumped 19% to nearly $111 million for the quarter ended April 30,the prospectus said.</p><p><blockquote>Sprinklr 通过销售其统一的 CXM 云软件平台和其他服务的订阅来获得收入。招股说明书称，截至 4 月 30 日的季度收入增长 19%，达到近 1.11 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Sprinklr, however, isn’t profitable. Losses widened to $14.7 million for the quarter ended April 30 from $11.2 million for the same period in 2020. The company has 2,469 employees.</p><p><blockquote>然而，Sprinklr 并不盈利。截至 4 月 30 日的季度，亏损从 2020 年同期的 1,120 万美元扩大至 1,470 万美元。该公司有2469名员工。</blockquote></p><p> Hellman &amp; Friedman&nbsp;invested $200 million&nbsp;in Sprinklr last year at a $2.7 billion valuation. The private-equity firm will have nearly 25% voting power after the offering.</p><p><blockquote>Hellman &amp; Friedman 去年以 27 亿美元的估值向 Sprinklr 投资了 2 亿美元。发行后，这家私募股权公司将拥有近25%的投票权。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sprinklr-targets-5-billion-valuation-the-ipo-is-next-week-51623691688?mod=RTA\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sprinklr-targets-5-billion-valuation-the-ipo-is-next-week-51623691688?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114252405","content_text":"Sprinklr’s valuation could hit $5 billion when the tech start-up makes its public equities market debut next week.\nOn Monday, Sprinklr set terms for its initial public offering. The software company, backed by private-equity firm Hellman & Friedman, plans to offer 19 million shares at $18 to $20 each. It will trade under the ticker CXM on the New York Stock Exchange.\nSprinklr confidentially filedfor its IPO in March. Fourteen investment banks are listed on the deal.Morgan Stanley,JP Morgan,Citigroup,Barclays and Wells Fargo Securities are lead underwriters.\nThe New York company is scheduled to price its deal on June 22, and would trade the next day, a person familiar with the situation said. At $20 a share, Sprinklr’s valuation would reach $5 billion.\nFounded in 2009, Sprinklr provides a customer-experience management platform that assists companies in managing their digital identities—in advertising, marketing, research and on social media. The company has 1,021 customers, including McDonald’s (ticker: MCD),Microsoft(MSFT), L’Oréal and Verizon Communications(VZ).\nSprinklr generates revenue from the sale of subscriptions to its Unified CXM cloud-based software platform and other services. Revenue jumped 19% to nearly $111 million for the quarter ended April 30,the prospectus said.\nSprinklr, however, isn’t profitable. Losses widened to $14.7 million for the quarter ended April 30 from $11.2 million for the same period in 2020. The company has 2,469 employees.\nHellman & Friedman invested $200 million in Sprinklr last year at a $2.7 billion valuation. The private-equity firm will have nearly 25% voting power after the offering.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1436,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184591145,"gmtCreate":1623717933687,"gmtModify":1634029699073,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"haha","listText":"haha","text":"haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184591145","repostId":"1126626020","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1967,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185602127,"gmtCreate":1623644401669,"gmtModify":1634030719000,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"come on lah. any article from official source wouldn't be a reddit target.&nbsp;","listText":"come on lah. any article from official source wouldn't be a reddit target.&nbsp;","text":"come on lah. any article from official source wouldn't be a reddit target.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185602127","repostId":"1105297799","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185951972,"gmtCreate":1623631273396,"gmtModify":1634031010855,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"bump","listText":"bump","text":"bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185951972","repostId":"2142209295","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1586,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185953181,"gmtCreate":1623631254343,"gmtModify":1634031011822,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"bump","listText":"bump","text":"bump","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185953181","repostId":"2142209295","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1518,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185921245,"gmtCreate":1623631021687,"gmtModify":1634031019452,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"First!","listText":"First!","text":"First!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185921245","repostId":"2143857817","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1331,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185929673,"gmtCreate":1623630986392,"gmtModify":1634031021346,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"pls like + comment","listText":"pls like + comment","text":"pls like + comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185929673","repostId":"1146430910","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2444,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182481554,"gmtCreate":1623598383178,"gmtModify":1634031300800,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"test","listText":"test","text":"test","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182481554","repostId":"2143788705","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182155399,"gmtCreate":1623559311811,"gmtModify":1634031692320,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yay","listText":"yay","text":"yay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182155399","repostId":"2142204074","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":623,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182042012,"gmtCreate":1623548804336,"gmtModify":1634031949720,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"jus faze","listText":"jus faze","text":"jus faze","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182042012","repostId":"2143788705","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":696,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182046112,"gmtCreate":1623548767436,"gmtModify":1634031950332,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"the 4th person is ??","listText":"the 4th person is ??","text":"the 4th person is ??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182046112","repostId":"1191179846","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":469,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182043150,"gmtCreate":1623548679070,"gmtModify":1634031952621,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"space travel all mumbo jumbo stuffs","listText":"space travel all mumbo jumbo stuffs","text":"space travel all mumbo jumbo stuffs","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182043150","repostId":"1143408374","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182049339,"gmtCreate":1623548629021,"gmtModify":1634031953682,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"I wan to do a space travel before I die","listText":"I wan to do a space travel before I die","text":"I wan to do a space travel before I die","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182049339","repostId":"1143408374","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":537,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182052267,"gmtCreate":1623548461259,"gmtModify":1634031957374,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"meme stocks are too volatile&nbsp;","listText":"meme stocks are too volatile&nbsp;","text":"meme stocks are too volatile","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182052267","repostId":"1185020128","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185020128","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623537503,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1185020128?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-13 06:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Meme Stock Soars 1,000% To Lead These Two Top Small Cap Stock Plays<blockquote>Meme 股票飙升 1,000%，领跑这两只顶级小盘股</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185020128","media":"investors","summary":"GameStop may be the top holding in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value, but that's not the only reason the ","content":"<p>GameStop may be the top holding in SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Value, but that's not the only reason the ETF is beating its growth-stock counterpart.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站可能是 SPDR S&amp;P 600 小盘股价值的最大持股，但这并不是该 ETF 击败成长型股票的唯一原因。</blockquote></p><p> The $4.2 billion value fund tracks the S&amp;P SmallCap 600 Value Index (SLYV), composed of stocks with the strongest value traits based on book value to price ratio, earnings to price ratio, and sales to price ratio. SLYV rallied 32% this year through Thursday's close.</p><p><blockquote>这只价值 42 亿美元的价值基金追踪标准普尔小型股 600 价值指数 (SLYV)，该指数由基于账面市盈率、市盈率和销售率的最强价值特征的股票组成。截至周四收盘，SLYV 今年上涨了 32%。</blockquote></p><p> That more than doubles the return of its growth stock counterpart, SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Growth (SLYG), which is up 15%. The index SLYG tracks includes stocks with the strongest growth traits based on sales growth, earnings change to price and momentum.</p><p><blockquote>这比其成长型股票 SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Growth (SLYG) 的回报率增加了一倍多，后者上涨了 15%。SLYG 跟踪的指数包括基于销售增长、盈利对价格和势头的变化而具有最强增长特征的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Back to SLYV, financials accounted for the biggest sector weight at 24% of assets. Industrials weighed in at about 17%, consumer discretionary 15% and real estate 10%. Information technology was next at 8% and materials, energy and health care, 6% each.&nbsp;Smaller positions in consumer staples, utilities and communication services made up the rest.</p><p><blockquote>回到 SLYV，金融业占该行业权重最大，占资产的 24%。工业约占17%，非必需消费品15%，房地产10%。信息技术紧随其后，占8%，材料、能源和医疗保健各占6%。消费品、公用事业和通信服务等较小的头寸占其余头寸。</blockquote></p><p> SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Value is in IBD's ETF Leaders, but SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Growth is not.</p><p><blockquote>SPDR S&amp;P 600 小盘股价值位居 IBD ETF 领先地位，但 SPDR S&amp;P 600 小盘股增长并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> <b>GameStop Stock Leads</b></p><p><blockquote><b>游戏驿站股票领先</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>GameStop</b>(GME),<b>Macy's</b>(M),<b>PDC Energy</b>(PDCE),<b>Resideo Technologies</b>(REZI) and<b>BankUnited</b>(BKU) were the top five holdings as of Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote><b>游戏驿站</b>（GME），<b>梅西百货</b>（米），<b>PDC能源</b>（PDCE），<b>Resideo技术公司</b>（雷齐）和<b>联合银行</b>（BKU）是截至周三的前五大持股。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Pacific Premier Bancorp</b>(PPBI),<b>Bed Bath &amp; Beyond</b>(BBBY),<b>Ameris Bancorp</b>(ABCB),<b>First Hawaiian</b>(FHB) and<b>Insight Enterprises</b>(NSIT) rounded out the top 10.</p><p><blockquote><b>太平洋卓越银行</b>（PPBI），<b>床浴及其他</b>（BBBY），<b>美国银行</b>（ABCB），<b>第一个夏威夷人</b>（FHB）和<b>洞察企业</b>（NSIT）跻身前10名。</blockquote></p><p> GameStop has undergone wide swings this year. It rocketed about 2,500% early this year amid theshort-squeeze rallyfueled by the Reddit/WallStreetBets crowd.GME stockthen crashed 92% from a Jan. 28 high to its mid-February low. That was followed by an 805% surge the next three weeks, and a 66% drop over the next two weeks.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站今年经历了很大的波动。今年早些时候，在 Reddit/WallStreetBets crowd.GME 引发的空头挤压反弹中，该股飙升约 2,500%。随后，GME 股票从 1 月 28 日的高点暴跌 92%，跌至 2 月中旬的低点。随后在接下来的三周内飙升了 805%，在接下来的两周内下降了 66%。</blockquote></p><p> Action had been relatively subdued since, until Thursday's 27% dive. Even after that, GameStop stock was up 1,070% year to date through Thursday's close.</p><p><blockquote>此后，股价一直相对低迷，直到周四暴跌 27%。即便如此，截至周四收盘，游戏驿站股价今年迄今已上涨 1,070%。</blockquote></p><p> Could GME be inflating SLYV's performance? Certainly, given its quadruple-digit gain. But a look at SLYG's portfolio is interesting. GameStop stock is also the top holding in the growth stock ETF, though the rest of the top 10 differ vastly.</p><p><blockquote>GME 会夸大 SLYV 的业绩吗？当然，考虑到其四位数的增益。但看看 SLYG 的投资组合很有趣。游戏驿站股票也是成长型股票 ETF 中持有量最大的股票，尽管前 10 名中的其他股票差异很大。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Second Meme Stock In Top 10</b></p><p><blockquote><b>前 10 名中的第二只模因股票</b></blockquote></p><p> PDC Energy, up 130%, saw the next biggest gain in the top 10. The Colorado-based oil and gas explorer has a 97Relative Strength Rating, which mean it's in the top 3% of all stocks. Its relative strength line is at a 52-week high, a bullish sign.</p><p><blockquote>PDC Energy 上涨 130%，在前 10 名中涨幅第二大。这家总部位于科罗拉多州的石油和天然气勘探公司的相对实力评级为 97，这意味着它在所有股票中排名前 3%。其相对强弱线处于 52 周高点，这是一个看涨信号。</blockquote></p><p> Bed Bath &amp; Beyond, another meme stock, is up 78% this year. Shares surged more than 200% in January, amid a spate of wild double-digit swings. BBBY stock then gave back the bulk of its gains.</p><p><blockquote>另一只模因股票 Bed Bath &amp; Beyond 今年上涨了 78%。1 月份，股价飙升超过 200%，出现了一系列两位数的剧烈波动。BBBY 股票随后回吐了大部分涨幅。</blockquote></p><p> But the home goods retailer appears to be back on the radar of the WallStreetBets discussion group. On June 2, Bed Bath &amp; Beyond soared 62% before diving 28% the next session.</p><p><blockquote>但这家家居用品零售商似乎又回到了 WallStreetBets 讨论组的视线中。6 月 2 日，Bed Bath &amp; Beyond 飙升 62%，然后在接下来的交易日暴跌 28%。</blockquote></p><p> The rest of the top 10 stocks have also outperformed the broader market. Macy's is up 68% year to date, while Resideo, Pacific Premier and Ameris have risen more than 40% each. The lowest gainer, bank holding company First Hawaiian, has advanced 20%. The S&amp;P 500 held a 13% gain through Thursday's close.</p><p><blockquote>前 10 名股票的其余表现也优于大盘。梅西百货今年迄今已上涨 68%，而 Resideo、Pacific Premier 和 Ameris 的股价均上涨超过 40%。涨幅最低的银行控股公司 First Hawaiian 上涨了 20%。截至周四收盘，标普500上涨 13%。</blockquote></p><p> SLYV remains in potential buy range from an 87.29entryof acup with handle, according toMarketSmithchart analysis.&nbsp;SLYV and SLYG charge a 0.15% expense ratio.</p><p><blockquote>根据 MarketSmithChart 分析，SLYV 仍处于带手柄的 acup 的潜在买入区间，为 87.29。 SLYV 和 SLYG 收取 0.15% 的费用率。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610449120050","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Meme Stock Soars 1,000% To Lead These Two Top Small Cap Stock Plays<blockquote>Meme 股票飙升 1,000%，领跑这两只顶级小盘股</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMeme Stock Soars 1,000% To Lead These Two Top Small Cap Stock Plays<blockquote>Meme 股票飙升 1,000%，领跑这两只顶级小盘股</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">investors</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-13 06:38</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>GameStop may be the top holding in SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Value, but that's not the only reason the ETF is beating its growth-stock counterpart.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站可能是 SPDR S&amp;P 600 小盘股价值的最大持股，但这并不是该 ETF 击败成长型股票的唯一原因。</blockquote></p><p> The $4.2 billion value fund tracks the S&amp;P SmallCap 600 Value Index (SLYV), composed of stocks with the strongest value traits based on book value to price ratio, earnings to price ratio, and sales to price ratio. SLYV rallied 32% this year through Thursday's close.</p><p><blockquote>这只价值 42 亿美元的价值基金追踪标准普尔小型股 600 价值指数 (SLYV)，该指数由基于账面市盈率、市盈率和销售率的最强价值特征的股票组成。截至周四收盘，SLYV 今年上涨了 32%。</blockquote></p><p> That more than doubles the return of its growth stock counterpart, SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Growth (SLYG), which is up 15%. The index SLYG tracks includes stocks with the strongest growth traits based on sales growth, earnings change to price and momentum.</p><p><blockquote>这比其成长型股票 SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Growth (SLYG) 的回报率增加了一倍多，后者上涨了 15%。SLYG 跟踪的指数包括基于销售增长、盈利对价格和势头的变化而具有最强增长特征的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Back to SLYV, financials accounted for the biggest sector weight at 24% of assets. Industrials weighed in at about 17%, consumer discretionary 15% and real estate 10%. Information technology was next at 8% and materials, energy and health care, 6% each.&nbsp;Smaller positions in consumer staples, utilities and communication services made up the rest.</p><p><blockquote>回到 SLYV，金融业占该行业权重最大，占资产的 24%。工业约占17%，非必需消费品15%，房地产10%。信息技术紧随其后，占8%，材料、能源和医疗保健各占6%。消费品、公用事业和通信服务等较小的头寸占其余头寸。</blockquote></p><p> SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Value is in IBD's ETF Leaders, but SPDR S&amp;P 600 Small Cap Growth is not.</p><p><blockquote>SPDR S&amp;P 600 小盘股价值位居 IBD ETF 领先地位，但 SPDR S&amp;P 600 小盘股增长并非如此。</blockquote></p><p> <b>GameStop Stock Leads</b></p><p><blockquote><b>游戏驿站股票领先</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>GameStop</b>(GME),<b>Macy's</b>(M),<b>PDC Energy</b>(PDCE),<b>Resideo Technologies</b>(REZI) and<b>BankUnited</b>(BKU) were the top five holdings as of Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote><b>游戏驿站</b>（GME），<b>梅西百货</b>（米），<b>PDC能源</b>（PDCE），<b>Resideo技术公司</b>（雷齐）和<b>联合银行</b>（BKU）是截至周三的前五大持股。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Pacific Premier Bancorp</b>(PPBI),<b>Bed Bath &amp; Beyond</b>(BBBY),<b>Ameris Bancorp</b>(ABCB),<b>First Hawaiian</b>(FHB) and<b>Insight Enterprises</b>(NSIT) rounded out the top 10.</p><p><blockquote><b>太平洋卓越银行</b>（PPBI），<b>床浴及其他</b>（BBBY），<b>美国银行</b>（ABCB），<b>第一个夏威夷人</b>（FHB）和<b>洞察企业</b>（NSIT）跻身前10名。</blockquote></p><p> GameStop has undergone wide swings this year. It rocketed about 2,500% early this year amid theshort-squeeze rallyfueled by the Reddit/WallStreetBets crowd.GME stockthen crashed 92% from a Jan. 28 high to its mid-February low. That was followed by an 805% surge the next three weeks, and a 66% drop over the next two weeks.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站今年经历了很大的波动。今年早些时候，在 Reddit/WallStreetBets crowd.GME 引发的空头挤压反弹中，该股飙升约 2,500%。随后，GME 股票从 1 月 28 日的高点暴跌 92%，跌至 2 月中旬的低点。随后在接下来的三周内飙升了 805%，在接下来的两周内下降了 66%。</blockquote></p><p> Action had been relatively subdued since, until Thursday's 27% dive. Even after that, GameStop stock was up 1,070% year to date through Thursday's close.</p><p><blockquote>此后，股价一直相对低迷，直到周四暴跌 27%。即便如此，截至周四收盘，游戏驿站股价今年迄今已上涨 1,070%。</blockquote></p><p> Could GME be inflating SLYV's performance? Certainly, given its quadruple-digit gain. But a look at SLYG's portfolio is interesting. GameStop stock is also the top holding in the growth stock ETF, though the rest of the top 10 differ vastly.</p><p><blockquote>GME 会夸大 SLYV 的业绩吗？当然，考虑到其四位数的增益。但看看 SLYG 的投资组合很有趣。游戏驿站股票也是成长型股票 ETF 中持有量最大的股票，尽管前 10 名中的其他股票差异很大。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Second Meme Stock In Top 10</b></p><p><blockquote><b>前 10 名中的第二只模因股票</b></blockquote></p><p> PDC Energy, up 130%, saw the next biggest gain in the top 10. The Colorado-based oil and gas explorer has a 97Relative Strength Rating, which mean it's in the top 3% of all stocks. Its relative strength line is at a 52-week high, a bullish sign.</p><p><blockquote>PDC Energy 上涨 130%，在前 10 名中涨幅第二大。这家总部位于科罗拉多州的石油和天然气勘探公司的相对实力评级为 97，这意味着它在所有股票中排名前 3%。其相对强弱线处于 52 周高点，这是一个看涨信号。</blockquote></p><p> Bed Bath &amp; Beyond, another meme stock, is up 78% this year. Shares surged more than 200% in January, amid a spate of wild double-digit swings. BBBY stock then gave back the bulk of its gains.</p><p><blockquote>另一只模因股票 Bed Bath &amp; Beyond 今年上涨了 78%。1 月份，股价飙升超过 200%，出现了一系列两位数的剧烈波动。BBBY 股票随后回吐了大部分涨幅。</blockquote></p><p> But the home goods retailer appears to be back on the radar of the WallStreetBets discussion group. On June 2, Bed Bath &amp; Beyond soared 62% before diving 28% the next session.</p><p><blockquote>但这家家居用品零售商似乎又回到了 WallStreetBets 讨论组的视线中。6 月 2 日，Bed Bath &amp; Beyond 飙升 62%，然后在接下来的交易日暴跌 28%。</blockquote></p><p> The rest of the top 10 stocks have also outperformed the broader market. Macy's is up 68% year to date, while Resideo, Pacific Premier and Ameris have risen more than 40% each. The lowest gainer, bank holding company First Hawaiian, has advanced 20%. The S&amp;P 500 held a 13% gain through Thursday's close.</p><p><blockquote>前 10 名股票的其余表现也优于大盘。梅西百货今年迄今已上涨 68%，而 Resideo、Pacific Premier 和 Ameris 的股价均上涨超过 40%。涨幅最低的银行控股公司 First Hawaiian 上涨了 20%。截至周四收盘，标普500上涨 13%。</blockquote></p><p> SLYV remains in potential buy range from an 87.29entryof acup with handle, according toMarketSmithchart analysis.&nbsp;SLYV and SLYG charge a 0.15% expense ratio.</p><p><blockquote>根据 MarketSmithChart 分析，SLYV 仍处于带手柄的 acup 的潜在买入区间，为 87.29。 SLYV 和 SLYG 收取 0.15% 的费用率。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.investors.com/etfs-and-funds/etf-leaders/gamestop-stock-soars-1000-percent-lead-two-top-small-cap-stock-plays/?src=A00220\">investors</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PDCE":"PDC Energy"},"source_url":"https://www.investors.com/etfs-and-funds/etf-leaders/gamestop-stock-soars-1000-percent-lead-two-top-small-cap-stock-plays/?src=A00220","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185020128","content_text":"GameStop may be the top holding in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value, but that's not the only reason the ETF is beating its growth-stock counterpart.\nThe $4.2 billion value fund tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index (SLYV), composed of stocks with the strongest value traits based on book value to price ratio, earnings to price ratio, and sales to price ratio. SLYV rallied 32% this year through Thursday's close.\nThat more than doubles the return of its growth stock counterpart, SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth (SLYG), which is up 15%. The index SLYG tracks includes stocks with the strongest growth traits based on sales growth, earnings change to price and momentum.\nBack to SLYV, financials accounted for the biggest sector weight at 24% of assets. Industrials weighed in at about 17%, consumer discretionary 15% and real estate 10%. Information technology was next at 8% and materials, energy and health care, 6% each. Smaller positions in consumer staples, utilities and communication services made up the rest.\nSPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value is in IBD's ETF Leaders, but SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth is not.\nGameStop Stock Leads\nGameStop(GME),Macy's(M),PDC Energy(PDCE),Resideo Technologies(REZI) andBankUnited(BKU) were the top five holdings as of Wednesday.\nPacific Premier Bancorp(PPBI),Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY),Ameris Bancorp(ABCB),First Hawaiian(FHB) andInsight Enterprises(NSIT) rounded out the top 10.\nGameStop has undergone wide swings this year. It rocketed about 2,500% early this year amid theshort-squeeze rallyfueled by the Reddit/WallStreetBets crowd.GME stockthen crashed 92% from a Jan. 28 high to its mid-February low. That was followed by an 805% surge the next three weeks, and a 66% drop over the next two weeks.\nAction had been relatively subdued since, until Thursday's 27% dive. Even after that, GameStop stock was up 1,070% year to date through Thursday's close.\nCould GME be inflating SLYV's performance? Certainly, given its quadruple-digit gain. But a look at SLYG's portfolio is interesting. GameStop stock is also the top holding in the growth stock ETF, though the rest of the top 10 differ vastly.\nSecond Meme Stock In Top 10\nPDC Energy, up 130%, saw the next biggest gain in the top 10. The Colorado-based oil and gas explorer has a 97Relative Strength Rating, which mean it's in the top 3% of all stocks. Its relative strength line is at a 52-week high, a bullish sign.\nBed Bath & Beyond, another meme stock, is up 78% this year. Shares surged more than 200% in January, amid a spate of wild double-digit swings. BBBY stock then gave back the bulk of its gains.\nBut the home goods retailer appears to be back on the radar of the WallStreetBets discussion group. On June 2, Bed Bath & Beyond soared 62% before diving 28% the next session.\nThe rest of the top 10 stocks have also outperformed the broader market. Macy's is up 68% year to date, while Resideo, Pacific Premier and Ameris have risen more than 40% each. The lowest gainer, bank holding company First Hawaiian, has advanced 20%. The S&P 500 held a 13% gain through Thursday's close.\nSLYV remains in potential buy range from an 87.29entryof acup with handle, according toMarketSmithchart analysis. SLYV and SLYG charge a 0.15% expense ratio.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BBBY":0.9,"PDCE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":605,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374229628,"gmtCreate":1619449648064,"gmtModify":1634273356352,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581807635057347","authorIdStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yay","listText":"yay","text":"yay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/374229628","repostId":"1179520467","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179520467","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619448994,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1179520467?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-26 22:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Invests In 9 Renewable Energy Projects In 5 Countries<blockquote>亚马逊在5个国家投资9个可再生能源项目</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179520467","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) has announced investments in nine new renewable energy projects acros","content":"<p><b>Amazon.com Inc.</b> (NASDAQ: <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/stock/amzn#NASDAQ\" target=\"_blank\">AMZN</a>) has announced investments in nine new renewable energy projects across five countries.</p><p><blockquote><b>亚马逊公司。</b>（纳斯达克：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/stock/amzn#NASDAQ\" target=\"_blank\">亚马逊</a>）已宣布在五个国家投资九个新的可再生能源项目。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b> The Seattle-headquartered company’s investments in North America encompass a 100 MW solar project in The Valley of the Kings, California, that will generate enough energy to power more than 28,000 homes a year, including 70 MW of storage; a&nbsp;118 MW wind power project in Murray County, Oklahoma,&nbsp;the company’s first investment in that state;&nbsp;and new solar projects in three Ohio counties that will generate more than 400 MW of electricity.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>这家总部位于西雅图的公司在北美的投资包括在加利福尼亚州国王谷的一个 100 兆瓦太阳能项目，该项目每年将产生足够的能源为 28,000 多个家庭供电，其中包括 70 兆瓦的储能设施；位于俄克拉荷马州默里县的 118 兆瓦风力发电项目，这是该公司在该州的首笔投资；俄亥俄州三个县的新太阳能项目将产生超过 400 兆瓦的电力。</blockquote></p><p> In Europe, Amazon is investing in the U.K.’s largest corporate renewable energy project, a 350 MW wind farm off the coast of Scotland. The company is also investing in two solar projects&nbsp;in Spain&nbsp;that add more than 170 MW to the nation’s grid and a 258 MW onshore wind project in northern Sweden.</p><p><blockquote>在欧洲，亚马逊正在投资英国最大的企业可再生能源项目--苏格兰海岸附近的一个 350 兆瓦风电场。该公司还在西班牙投资两个太阳能项目，为该国电网增加 170 多兆瓦的装机容量，并在瑞典北部投资一个 258 兆瓦的陆上风电项目。</blockquote></p><p> The company did not disclose the financial aspects of its new investments.</p><p><blockquote>该公司没有披露其新投资的财务方面。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b> In announcing the new projects, Amazon stated it now has investments in 206 renewable energy projects worldwide with a total generating capacity of 8.5 GW. The investments include 71 utility-scale wind and solar projects and 135 solar roof projects on commercial properties.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>亚马逊在宣布新项目时表示，目前在全球投资了206个可再生能源项目，总发电能力为8.5吉瓦。这些投资包括71个公用事业规模的风能和太阳能项目以及135个商业地产的太阳能屋顶项目。</blockquote></p><p> “Many of our businesses are already operating using renewable energy, which we expect to use to power all Amazon sectors by 2025 —&nbsp;five years ahead of the original 2030 target,” said company founder and CEO Jeff Bezos in a press statement.</p><p><blockquote>“公司创始人兼首席执行官杰夫·贝索斯在一份新闻声明中说：”我们的许多业务已经在使用可再生能源运营，我们预计到 2025 年，亚马逊所有部门都将使用可再生能源供电，这比最初的 2030 年目标提前了五年。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Invests In 9 Renewable Energy Projects In 5 Countries<blockquote>亚马逊在5个国家投资9个可再生能源项目</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Invests In 9 Renewable Energy Projects In 5 Countries<blockquote>亚马逊在5个国家投资9个可再生能源项目</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-26 22:56</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Amazon.com Inc.</b> (NASDAQ: <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/stock/amzn#NASDAQ\" target=\"_blank\">AMZN</a>) has announced investments in nine new renewable energy projects across five countries.</p><p><blockquote><b>亚马逊公司。</b>（纳斯达克：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/stock/amzn#NASDAQ\" target=\"_blank\">亚马逊</a>）已宣布在五个国家投资九个新的可再生能源项目。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b> The Seattle-headquartered company’s investments in North America encompass a 100 MW solar project in The Valley of the Kings, California, that will generate enough energy to power more than 28,000 homes a year, including 70 MW of storage; a&nbsp;118 MW wind power project in Murray County, Oklahoma,&nbsp;the company’s first investment in that state;&nbsp;and new solar projects in three Ohio counties that will generate more than 400 MW of electricity.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>这家总部位于西雅图的公司在北美的投资包括在加利福尼亚州国王谷的一个 100 兆瓦太阳能项目，该项目每年将产生足够的能源为 28,000 多个家庭供电，其中包括 70 兆瓦的储能设施；位于俄克拉荷马州默里县的 118 兆瓦风力发电项目，这是该公司在该州的首笔投资；俄亥俄州三个县的新太阳能项目将产生超过 400 兆瓦的电力。</blockquote></p><p> In Europe, Amazon is investing in the U.K.’s largest corporate renewable energy project, a 350 MW wind farm off the coast of Scotland. The company is also investing in two solar projects&nbsp;in Spain&nbsp;that add more than 170 MW to the nation’s grid and a 258 MW onshore wind project in northern Sweden.</p><p><blockquote>在欧洲，亚马逊正在投资英国最大的企业可再生能源项目--苏格兰海岸附近的一个 350 兆瓦风电场。该公司还在西班牙投资两个太阳能项目，为该国电网增加 170 多兆瓦的装机容量，并在瑞典北部投资一个 258 兆瓦的陆上风电项目。</blockquote></p><p> The company did not disclose the financial aspects of its new investments.</p><p><blockquote>该公司没有披露其新投资的财务方面。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b> In announcing the new projects, Amazon stated it now has investments in 206 renewable energy projects worldwide with a total generating capacity of 8.5 GW. The investments include 71 utility-scale wind and solar projects and 135 solar roof projects on commercial properties.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>亚马逊在宣布新项目时表示，目前在全球投资了206个可再生能源项目，总发电能力为8.5吉瓦。这些投资包括71个公用事业规模的风能和太阳能项目以及135个商业地产的太阳能屋顶项目。</blockquote></p><p> “Many of our businesses are already operating using renewable energy, which we expect to use to power all Amazon sectors by 2025 —&nbsp;five years ahead of the original 2030 target,” said company founder and CEO Jeff Bezos in a press statement.</p><p><blockquote>“公司创始人兼首席执行官杰夫·贝索斯在一份新闻声明中说：”我们的许多业务已经在使用可再生能源运营，我们预计到 2025 年，亚马逊所有部门都将使用可再生能源供电，这比最初的 2030 年目标提前了五年。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1179520467","content_text":"Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) has announced investments in nine new renewable energy projects across five countries.\nWhat Happened: The Seattle-headquartered company’s investments in North America encompass a 100 MW solar project in The Valley of the Kings, California, that will generate enough energy to power more than 28,000 homes a year, including 70 MW of storage; a 118 MW wind power project in Murray County, Oklahoma, the company’s first investment in that state; and new solar projects in three Ohio counties that will generate more than 400 MW of electricity.\nIn Europe, Amazon is investing in the U.K.’s largest corporate renewable energy project, a 350 MW wind farm off the coast of Scotland. The company is also investing in two solar projects in Spain that add more than 170 MW to the nation’s grid and a 258 MW onshore wind project in northern Sweden.\nThe company did not disclose the financial aspects of its new investments.\nWhy It Matters: In announcing the new projects, Amazon stated it now has investments in 206 renewable energy projects worldwide with a total generating capacity of 8.5 GW. The investments include 71 utility-scale wind and solar projects and 135 solar roof projects on commercial properties.\n“Many of our businesses are already operating using renewable energy, which we expect to use to power all Amazon sectors by 2025 — five years ahead of the original 2030 target,” said company founder and CEO Jeff Bezos in a press statement.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":395,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":182481554,"gmtCreate":1623598383178,"gmtModify":1634031300800,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"test","listText":"test","text":"test","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182481554","repostId":"2143788705","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185929673,"gmtCreate":1623630986392,"gmtModify":1634031021346,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"pls like + comment","listText":"pls like + comment","text":"pls like + comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185929673","repostId":"1146430910","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2444,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182155399,"gmtCreate":1623559311811,"gmtModify":1634031692320,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yay","listText":"yay","text":"yay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182155399","repostId":"2142204074","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":623,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182046112,"gmtCreate":1623548767436,"gmtModify":1634031950332,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"the 4th person is ??","listText":"the 4th person is ??","text":"the 4th person is ??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182046112","repostId":"1191179846","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":469,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185921245,"gmtCreate":1623631021687,"gmtModify":1634031019452,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"First!","listText":"First!","text":"First!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185921245","repostId":"2143857817","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1331,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185602127,"gmtCreate":1623644401669,"gmtModify":1634030719000,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"come on lah. any article from official source wouldn't be a reddit target.&nbsp;","listText":"come on lah. any article from official source wouldn't be a reddit target.&nbsp;","text":"come on lah. any article from official source wouldn't be a reddit target.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185602127","repostId":"1105297799","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184530660,"gmtCreate":1623718095650,"gmtModify":1634029692690,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"haha","listText":"haha","text":"haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184530660","repostId":"1112731941","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112731941","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623716319,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1112731941?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-15 08:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett and the Myth of the ‘Good Billionaire’<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特与“优秀亿万富翁”的神话</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112731941","media":"The New York Times","summary":"Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty\nWarren Buffett appears to be the safest kin","content":"<p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/002912ff5cccdf9eee5a5197b6b82e93\" tg-width=\"1600\" tg-height=\"1600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>纽约时报插图；照片来自盖蒂</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Warren Buffett appears to be the safest kind of billionaire: the good kind. Mr. Buffett is neither Zuckerbergian messiah nor Musky provocateur, neither Bezosist space cadet nor Sacklerian undertaker. He is, or seems to be, quiet, humble, indifferent to money, philanthropic and critical of the system that allowed him to rise. Years ago, a proposed tax increase was named after him.</p><p><blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特似乎是最安全的亿万富翁：善良的那种。巴菲特既不是扎克伯格式的救世主，也不是马斯基式的挑衅者，既不是贝佐斯式的太空学员，也不是萨克勒式的殡仪员。他是，或者看起来是，安静，谦逊，对金钱漠不关心，乐善好施，对让他崛起的制度持批评态度。几年前，一项增税提案就是以他的名字命名的。</blockquote></p><p> It’s easy for people to think: If only members of the Sackler family were more like Mr. Buffett, imagine how many lives would have been saved. If only the billionaires who haven’t signed the Giving Pledge would give away as much as Mr. Buffett has pledged to, imagine the impact on the world. If only more billionaires would make use of the system without feeling the need to pervert it, so many of our troubles would vanish.</p><p><blockquote>人们很容易认为： 如果萨克勒家族的成员更像巴菲特先生，想象一下会挽救多少生命。如果只有那些没有签署捐赠承诺的亿万富翁们能像巴菲特先生承诺的那样捐赠多少钱，想象一下对世界的影响。如果更多的亿万富翁能够利用这个系统而不觉得有必要扭曲它，我们的许多麻烦就会消失。</blockquote></p><p> So I regret to inform you that Mr. Buffett is actually the most dangerous kind of billionaire we have. The worst billionaires are the Good Billionaires. The sort who make it seem like the problem is the distortion of the system when, in fact, the problem is the system.</p><p><blockquote>所以我很遗憾地告诉你，巴菲特先生实际上是我们拥有的最危险的亿万富翁。最差的亿万富翁是优秀的亿万富翁。那种让问题看起来是系统的扭曲，而事实上，问题是系统本身。</blockquote></p><p> Actually malevolent and disastrously negligent plutocrats get most of the attention. And when we hear about these Bad Billionaire exploits, it is possible to conclude from them that the system needs better policing, updated regulations and maybe slightly higher taxes. The system needs to be made to work again.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，恶意和灾难性疏忽的财阀得到了大部分的关注。当我们听说这些糟糕的亿万富翁的漏洞时，有可能从中得出结论，该系统需要更好的监管，更新的法规，也许还需要稍微提高税收。系统需要重新工作。</blockquote></p><p> But as America slouches toward plutocracy, our problem isn’t the virtue level of billionaires. It’s a set of social arrangements that make it possible for anyone to gain and guard and keep so much wealth, even as millions of others lack for food, work, housing, health, connectivity, education, dignity and the occasion to pursue their happiness.</p><p><blockquote>但是，随着美国对财阀统治无动于衷，我们的问题并不在于亿万富翁的美德水平。这是一套社会安排，使任何人都有可能获得、守护和保留如此多的财富，即使还有数百万人缺乏食物、工作、住房、健康、联系、教育、尊严和追求幸福的机会。</blockquote></p><p> There is no way to be a billionaire in America without taking advantage of a system predicated on cruelty, a system whose tax code and labor laws and regulatory apparatus prioritize your needs above most people’s. Even noted Good Billionaire Mr. Buffett has profited from Coca-Cola’s sugary drinks, Amazon’s union busting, Chevron’s oil drilling, Clayton Homes’s predatory loans and, as the country learned recently, the failure to tax billionaires on their wealth.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，要想成为亿万富翁，就不可能不利用一个建立在残酷基础上的制度，这个制度的税法、劳动法和监管机构将你的需求置于大多数人的需求之上。就连著名的亿万富翁巴菲特先生也从可口可乐的含糖饮料、亚马逊的工会破裂、雪佛龙的石油钻探、克莱顿房屋公司的掠夺性贷款以及《国家》最近了解到的亿万富翁未能对其财富征税中获利。</blockquote></p><p> The Good Billionaire myth took a hard blow in recent days when Mr. Buffett won a dubious distinction. A&nbsp;staggering exposé&nbsp;published by ProPublica revealed just how little the biggest plutocrats pay in taxes, despite mounting piles of wealth. And at the very top of that list of plutocrats — many of them with troubled reputations — was the cleanest, grandfatherliest plutocrat of them all: Mr. Buffett.</p><p><blockquote>最近几天，当巴菲特赢得一项可疑的荣誉时，“好亿万富翁”的神话受到了沉重打击。ProPublica 发表的一篇令人震惊的揭露揭示了最大的财阀尽管拥有越来越多的财富，但缴纳的税款是多么少。在这份财阀名单的最顶端——其中许多人声誉不佳——是他们中最干净、最像祖父的财阀：巴菲特先生。</blockquote></p><p> ProPublica’s story was unusual in that, for once, it was the Good Billionaire at the top of the naughty list. This was helpful, because it served to indict the system that makes him possible, even when it is working perfectly, wholly lawfully.</p><p><blockquote>ProPublica 的故事不同寻常，因为这一次，它是淘气榜榜首的亿万富翁。这是有帮助的，因为它起到了起诉使他成为可能的系统的作用，即使它运行得非常完美，完全合法。</blockquote></p><p> From 2014 to 2018, Mr. Buffett’s wealth soared by $24.3 billion, according to ProPublica. (To underline, this is just the amount the fortune grew.) The amount of taxes Mr. Buffett paid over this period? $23.7 million. If middle-class Americans in their 40s enjoyed such a low effective tax rate, they would have paid a few dozen bucks per household over this same time period. Instead, as the ProPublica story notes, they paid around $62,000.</p><p><blockquote>根据 ProPublica 的数据，从 2014 年到 2018 年，巴菲特先生的财富飙升了 243 亿美元。（强调一下，这只是财富增长的金额。）巴菲特先生在此期间缴纳了多少税？2370万美元。如果40多岁的美国中产阶级享受如此低的有效税率，他们将在同一时期为每个家庭支付几十美元。相反，正如ProPublica的报道所指出的，他们支付了大约62,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> Imagine if Mr. Buffett had to pay the same fraction of the growth of his net worth that regular people do. Taxing that money could have helped pay for bridge repairs, mammograms, and free day care. More important — and this isn’t said enough — there is intrinsic value in shrinking gargantuan fortunes. The sway plutocrats have over public life is inconsistent with a one person, one vote democracy.</p><p><blockquote>想象一下，如果巴菲特先生不得不支付与普通人相同的净资产增长比例。对这笔钱征税可以帮助支付桥梁维修、乳房x光检查和免费日托费用。更重要的是--这一点还不够--缩小巨额财富具有内在价值。财阀对公共生活的影响与一人一票的民主不一致。</blockquote></p><p> The important point here is that Mr. Buffett’s tax payments as detailed by ProPublica are fully legal. Though Mr. Buffett has called for changing the tax system, while we have the one we have, he will continue to benefit from the madness of taxing billionaires for their income, rather than their wealth, when their income is pretty much just a number they can construct.</p><p><blockquote>这里重要的一点是，ProPublica 详细介绍的巴菲特先生的纳税情况是完全合法的。尽管巴菲特呼吁改变税收制度，但当我们有我们现有的税收制度时，他将继续从对亿万富翁的收入而不是财富征税的疯狂行为中受益，而他们的收入几乎只是一个他们可以构建的数字。</blockquote></p><p> I asked Mr. Buffett last week, via his longtime secretary, Debbie Bosanek, if he could think of even one tax or accounting practice that he has come to regret. Sure, he may have followed the letter of the law. But was there any aspect of his patriotism or humanity that left him feeling guilty for hoarding so much untaxed when regular people pay so much in taxes? Though Ms. Bosanek responded to an initial inquiry, she declined to offer any such examples.</p><p><blockquote>上周，我通过巴菲特的长期秘书黛比·博萨内克问他，他是否能想到哪怕一个他后悔的税务或会计做法。当然，他可能遵守了法律条文。但是，当普通人缴纳如此多的税款时，他的爱国主义或人性是否有任何方面让他为囤积如此多的未纳税而感到内疚？尽管Bosanek女士对初步询问作出了答复，但她拒绝提供任何此类例子。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a long statement last week, Mr. Buffett&nbsp;defended himself&nbsp;by pointing to his long advocacy for a fairer taxation system, and then he immediately told on himself by undermining the very idea of taxes in the same letter. “I believe the money will be of more use to society if disbursed philanthropically than if it is used to slightly reduce an ever-increasing U.S. debt.”</p><p><blockquote>在上周的一份长篇声明中，巴菲特为自己辩护，指出他长期以来主张建立一个更公平的税收制度，然后他立即在同一封信中破坏了税收的概念。“我相信，如果这笔钱用于慈善事业，对社会的益处将大于用于略微减少不断增加的美国债务”。</blockquote></p><p> In other words: I believe in higher income taxes on people like me, but I’m highly organized to avoid having income to report, and I don’t really believe in taxes because I think I should decide how these surplus resources are spent.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说： 我相信对像我这样的人征收更高的所得税，但我非常有条理地避免有收入要申报，而且我并不真正相信税收，因为我认为我应该决定如何使用这些盈余资源。</blockquote></p><p> And this points to another way in which the Good Billionaire is hard to deal with. The crooks and the scoundrels and the people manifestly looking for quick P.R. highs come to philanthropy for the marketing payoff. When Goldman Sachs announces a new initiative on fighting the racial wealth gap despite having done little to repair the damage it did to Black homeowners in contributing to the 2008 financial meltdown, some may be fooled, but, more and more, many are not.</p><p><blockquote>这指向了优秀的亿万富翁难以应对的另一种方式。骗子、恶棍和明显寻求快速公关的人来到慈善事业是为了营销回报。当高盛宣布一项消除种族贫富差距的新举措时，尽管它在修复2008年金融危机中对黑人房主造成的损害方面几乎没有采取任何措施，有些人可能会被愚弄，但越来越多的人没有被愚弄。</blockquote></p><p> Supposed Good Billionaires like Mr. Buffett and his friend Bill Gates are more complicated because they give real money. They may benefit from marketing but also seem to many people to be motivated by more than that, and they apply their smarts to the work.</p><p><blockquote>像巴菲特和他的朋友比尔盖茨这样的所谓优秀的亿万富翁更复杂，因为他们给的是真金白银。他们可能会从营销中受益，但似乎许多人也会受到更多的激励，他们会将自己的智慧运用到工作中。</blockquote></p><p> Yet because of this, it is often the Good Billionaires who end up with the most illegitimate influence over public life. No one is asking members of the Sackler family for public health advice. But Mr. Gates has become a major policy voice on vaccines despite holding no elected position. Mr. Buffett, for his part, has shied away from that kind of lane hopping and richsplaining, but in donating his fortune to Mr. Gates’s foundation he has pumped up that undemocratic influence.</p><p><blockquote>然而，正因为如此，往往是优秀的亿万富翁最终对公共生活产生了最不正当的影响。没有人向萨克勒家族的成员寻求公共卫生建议。但是盖茨先生已经成为疫苗的主要政策代言人，尽管他没有当选职位。巴菲特先生则回避了这种跳槽和炫富的做法，但通过将自己的财富捐赠给盖茨先生的基金会，他放大了这种不民主的影响力。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Buffett is almost the perfectly made billionaire for this moment in which, at last, many Americans are beginning to question not only corruptions of the system but the matter of whether billionaires should exist at all. He doesn’t do the things the worst of them do. He isn’t in it for what they’re in it for. He clearly must care about money, but he also kind of doesn’t care about money. Even in his generosity, he has avoided the imperial lording over that others cannot resist.</p><p><blockquote>目前，巴菲特几乎是完美的亿万富翁，在这个时刻，许多美国人终于开始质疑这个体系的腐败，以及亿万富翁是否应该存在的问题。他不会做他们中最坏的人做的事。他不是为了他们的目的而参与的。他显然肯定在乎钱，但他也有点不在乎钱。即使在他的慷慨中，他也避免了其他人无法抗拒的帝国统治。</blockquote></p><p> And this is what makes him so troubling, because through him we are tempted into believing that a system can be defended that allows a man to accumulate more than $100 billion while people are sleeping, in hock to him, in his mobile homes, shortening their lives with the beverages he’s invested in, scampering around the warehouses whose nonunion status has redounded to his money pile.</p><p><blockquote>这就是他如此令人不安的原因，因为通过他，我们很容易相信，一个制度是可以捍卫的，这个制度允许一个人在人们睡觉时积累超过 1000 亿美元，在他的活动房屋里，用他投资的饮料缩短他们的寿命，在仓库里跑来跑去，而这些仓库的非工会身份已经增加到他的钱堆里。</blockquote></p><p> It can’t. And who keeps us from seeing that simple, stark truth more effectively, more perniciously, than the Good Billionaire?</p><p><blockquote>它不能。谁比善良的亿万富翁更有效地、更有害地阻止我们看到这个简单、赤裸裸的真相？</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1608616134662","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett and the Myth of the ‘Good Billionaire’<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特与“优秀亿万富翁”的神话</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett and the Myth of the ‘Good Billionaire’<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特与“优秀亿万富翁”的神话</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The New York Times</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 08:18</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/002912ff5cccdf9eee5a5197b6b82e93\" tg-width=\"1600\" tg-height=\"1600\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>纽约时报插图；照片来自盖蒂</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Warren Buffett appears to be the safest kind of billionaire: the good kind. Mr. Buffett is neither Zuckerbergian messiah nor Musky provocateur, neither Bezosist space cadet nor Sacklerian undertaker. He is, or seems to be, quiet, humble, indifferent to money, philanthropic and critical of the system that allowed him to rise. Years ago, a proposed tax increase was named after him.</p><p><blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特似乎是最安全的亿万富翁：善良的那种。巴菲特既不是扎克伯格式的救世主，也不是马斯基式的挑衅者，既不是贝佐斯式的太空学员，也不是萨克勒式的殡仪员。他是，或者看起来是，安静，谦逊，对金钱漠不关心，乐善好施，对让他崛起的制度持批评态度。几年前，一项增税提案就是以他的名字命名的。</blockquote></p><p> It’s easy for people to think: If only members of the Sackler family were more like Mr. Buffett, imagine how many lives would have been saved. If only the billionaires who haven’t signed the Giving Pledge would give away as much as Mr. Buffett has pledged to, imagine the impact on the world. If only more billionaires would make use of the system without feeling the need to pervert it, so many of our troubles would vanish.</p><p><blockquote>人们很容易认为： 如果萨克勒家族的成员更像巴菲特先生，想象一下会挽救多少生命。如果只有那些没有签署捐赠承诺的亿万富翁们能像巴菲特先生承诺的那样捐赠多少钱，想象一下对世界的影响。如果更多的亿万富翁能够利用这个系统而不觉得有必要扭曲它，我们的许多麻烦就会消失。</blockquote></p><p> So I regret to inform you that Mr. Buffett is actually the most dangerous kind of billionaire we have. The worst billionaires are the Good Billionaires. The sort who make it seem like the problem is the distortion of the system when, in fact, the problem is the system.</p><p><blockquote>所以我很遗憾地告诉你，巴菲特先生实际上是我们拥有的最危险的亿万富翁。最差的亿万富翁是优秀的亿万富翁。那种让问题看起来是系统的扭曲，而事实上，问题是系统本身。</blockquote></p><p> Actually malevolent and disastrously negligent plutocrats get most of the attention. And when we hear about these Bad Billionaire exploits, it is possible to conclude from them that the system needs better policing, updated regulations and maybe slightly higher taxes. The system needs to be made to work again.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，恶意和灾难性疏忽的财阀得到了大部分的关注。当我们听说这些糟糕的亿万富翁的漏洞时，有可能从中得出结论，该系统需要更好的监管，更新的法规，也许还需要稍微提高税收。系统需要重新工作。</blockquote></p><p> But as America slouches toward plutocracy, our problem isn’t the virtue level of billionaires. It’s a set of social arrangements that make it possible for anyone to gain and guard and keep so much wealth, even as millions of others lack for food, work, housing, health, connectivity, education, dignity and the occasion to pursue their happiness.</p><p><blockquote>但是，随着美国对财阀统治无动于衷，我们的问题并不在于亿万富翁的美德水平。这是一套社会安排，使任何人都有可能获得、守护和保留如此多的财富，即使还有数百万人缺乏食物、工作、住房、健康、联系、教育、尊严和追求幸福的机会。</blockquote></p><p> There is no way to be a billionaire in America without taking advantage of a system predicated on cruelty, a system whose tax code and labor laws and regulatory apparatus prioritize your needs above most people’s. Even noted Good Billionaire Mr. Buffett has profited from Coca-Cola’s sugary drinks, Amazon’s union busting, Chevron’s oil drilling, Clayton Homes’s predatory loans and, as the country learned recently, the failure to tax billionaires on their wealth.</p><p><blockquote>在美国，要想成为亿万富翁，就不可能不利用一个建立在残酷基础上的制度，这个制度的税法、劳动法和监管机构将你的需求置于大多数人的需求之上。就连著名的亿万富翁巴菲特先生也从可口可乐的含糖饮料、亚马逊的工会破裂、雪佛龙的石油钻探、克莱顿房屋公司的掠夺性贷款以及《国家》最近了解到的亿万富翁未能对其财富征税中获利。</blockquote></p><p> The Good Billionaire myth took a hard blow in recent days when Mr. Buffett won a dubious distinction. A&nbsp;staggering exposé&nbsp;published by ProPublica revealed just how little the biggest plutocrats pay in taxes, despite mounting piles of wealth. And at the very top of that list of plutocrats — many of them with troubled reputations — was the cleanest, grandfatherliest plutocrat of them all: Mr. Buffett.</p><p><blockquote>最近几天，当巴菲特赢得一项可疑的荣誉时，“好亿万富翁”的神话受到了沉重打击。ProPublica 发表的一篇令人震惊的揭露揭示了最大的财阀尽管拥有越来越多的财富，但缴纳的税款是多么少。在这份财阀名单的最顶端——其中许多人声誉不佳——是他们中最干净、最像祖父的财阀：巴菲特先生。</blockquote></p><p> ProPublica’s story was unusual in that, for once, it was the Good Billionaire at the top of the naughty list. This was helpful, because it served to indict the system that makes him possible, even when it is working perfectly, wholly lawfully.</p><p><blockquote>ProPublica 的故事不同寻常，因为这一次，它是淘气榜榜首的亿万富翁。这是有帮助的，因为它起到了起诉使他成为可能的系统的作用，即使它运行得非常完美，完全合法。</blockquote></p><p> From 2014 to 2018, Mr. Buffett’s wealth soared by $24.3 billion, according to ProPublica. (To underline, this is just the amount the fortune grew.) The amount of taxes Mr. Buffett paid over this period? $23.7 million. If middle-class Americans in their 40s enjoyed such a low effective tax rate, they would have paid a few dozen bucks per household over this same time period. Instead, as the ProPublica story notes, they paid around $62,000.</p><p><blockquote>根据 ProPublica 的数据，从 2014 年到 2018 年，巴菲特先生的财富飙升了 243 亿美元。（强调一下，这只是财富增长的金额。）巴菲特先生在此期间缴纳了多少税？2370万美元。如果40多岁的美国中产阶级享受如此低的有效税率，他们将在同一时期为每个家庭支付几十美元。相反，正如ProPublica的报道所指出的，他们支付了大约62,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> Imagine if Mr. Buffett had to pay the same fraction of the growth of his net worth that regular people do. Taxing that money could have helped pay for bridge repairs, mammograms, and free day care. More important — and this isn’t said enough — there is intrinsic value in shrinking gargantuan fortunes. The sway plutocrats have over public life is inconsistent with a one person, one vote democracy.</p><p><blockquote>想象一下，如果巴菲特先生不得不支付与普通人相同的净资产增长比例。对这笔钱征税可以帮助支付桥梁维修、乳房x光检查和免费日托费用。更重要的是--这一点还不够--缩小巨额财富具有内在价值。财阀对公共生活的影响与一人一票的民主不一致。</blockquote></p><p> The important point here is that Mr. Buffett’s tax payments as detailed by ProPublica are fully legal. Though Mr. Buffett has called for changing the tax system, while we have the one we have, he will continue to benefit from the madness of taxing billionaires for their income, rather than their wealth, when their income is pretty much just a number they can construct.</p><p><blockquote>这里重要的一点是，ProPublica 详细介绍的巴菲特先生的纳税情况是完全合法的。尽管巴菲特呼吁改变税收制度，但当我们有我们现有的税收制度时，他将继续从对亿万富翁的收入而不是财富征税的疯狂行为中受益，而他们的收入几乎只是一个他们可以构建的数字。</blockquote></p><p> I asked Mr. Buffett last week, via his longtime secretary, Debbie Bosanek, if he could think of even one tax or accounting practice that he has come to regret. Sure, he may have followed the letter of the law. But was there any aspect of his patriotism or humanity that left him feeling guilty for hoarding so much untaxed when regular people pay so much in taxes? Though Ms. Bosanek responded to an initial inquiry, she declined to offer any such examples.</p><p><blockquote>上周，我通过巴菲特的长期秘书黛比·博萨内克问他，他是否能想到哪怕一个他后悔的税务或会计做法。当然，他可能遵守了法律条文。但是，当普通人缴纳如此多的税款时，他的爱国主义或人性是否有任何方面让他为囤积如此多的未纳税而感到内疚？尽管Bosanek女士对初步询问作出了答复，但她拒绝提供任何此类例子。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a long statement last week, Mr. Buffett&nbsp;defended himself&nbsp;by pointing to his long advocacy for a fairer taxation system, and then he immediately told on himself by undermining the very idea of taxes in the same letter. “I believe the money will be of more use to society if disbursed philanthropically than if it is used to slightly reduce an ever-increasing U.S. debt.”</p><p><blockquote>在上周的一份长篇声明中，巴菲特为自己辩护，指出他长期以来主张建立一个更公平的税收制度，然后他立即在同一封信中破坏了税收的概念。“我相信，如果这笔钱用于慈善事业，对社会的益处将大于用于略微减少不断增加的美国债务”。</blockquote></p><p> In other words: I believe in higher income taxes on people like me, but I’m highly organized to avoid having income to report, and I don’t really believe in taxes because I think I should decide how these surplus resources are spent.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说： 我相信对像我这样的人征收更高的所得税，但我非常有条理地避免有收入要申报，而且我并不真正相信税收，因为我认为我应该决定如何使用这些盈余资源。</blockquote></p><p> And this points to another way in which the Good Billionaire is hard to deal with. The crooks and the scoundrels and the people manifestly looking for quick P.R. highs come to philanthropy for the marketing payoff. When Goldman Sachs announces a new initiative on fighting the racial wealth gap despite having done little to repair the damage it did to Black homeowners in contributing to the 2008 financial meltdown, some may be fooled, but, more and more, many are not.</p><p><blockquote>这指向了优秀的亿万富翁难以应对的另一种方式。骗子、恶棍和明显寻求快速公关的人来到慈善事业是为了营销回报。当高盛宣布一项消除种族贫富差距的新举措时，尽管它在修复2008年金融危机中对黑人房主造成的损害方面几乎没有采取任何措施，有些人可能会被愚弄，但越来越多的人没有被愚弄。</blockquote></p><p> Supposed Good Billionaires like Mr. Buffett and his friend Bill Gates are more complicated because they give real money. They may benefit from marketing but also seem to many people to be motivated by more than that, and they apply their smarts to the work.</p><p><blockquote>像巴菲特和他的朋友比尔盖茨这样的所谓优秀的亿万富翁更复杂，因为他们给的是真金白银。他们可能会从营销中受益，但似乎许多人也会受到更多的激励，他们会将自己的智慧运用到工作中。</blockquote></p><p> Yet because of this, it is often the Good Billionaires who end up with the most illegitimate influence over public life. No one is asking members of the Sackler family for public health advice. But Mr. Gates has become a major policy voice on vaccines despite holding no elected position. Mr. Buffett, for his part, has shied away from that kind of lane hopping and richsplaining, but in donating his fortune to Mr. Gates’s foundation he has pumped up that undemocratic influence.</p><p><blockquote>然而，正因为如此，往往是优秀的亿万富翁最终对公共生活产生了最不正当的影响。没有人向萨克勒家族的成员寻求公共卫生建议。但是盖茨先生已经成为疫苗的主要政策代言人，尽管他没有当选职位。巴菲特先生则回避了这种跳槽和炫富的做法，但通过将自己的财富捐赠给盖茨先生的基金会，他放大了这种不民主的影响力。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Buffett is almost the perfectly made billionaire for this moment in which, at last, many Americans are beginning to question not only corruptions of the system but the matter of whether billionaires should exist at all. He doesn’t do the things the worst of them do. He isn’t in it for what they’re in it for. He clearly must care about money, but he also kind of doesn’t care about money. Even in his generosity, he has avoided the imperial lording over that others cannot resist.</p><p><blockquote>目前，巴菲特几乎是完美的亿万富翁，在这个时刻，许多美国人终于开始质疑这个体系的腐败，以及亿万富翁是否应该存在的问题。他不会做他们中最坏的人做的事。他不是为了他们的目的而参与的。他显然肯定在乎钱，但他也有点不在乎钱。即使在他的慷慨中，他也避免了其他人无法抗拒的帝国统治。</blockquote></p><p> And this is what makes him so troubling, because through him we are tempted into believing that a system can be defended that allows a man to accumulate more than $100 billion while people are sleeping, in hock to him, in his mobile homes, shortening their lives with the beverages he’s invested in, scampering around the warehouses whose nonunion status has redounded to his money pile.</p><p><blockquote>这就是他如此令人不安的原因，因为通过他，我们很容易相信，一个制度是可以捍卫的，这个制度允许一个人在人们睡觉时积累超过 1000 亿美元，在他的活动房屋里，用他投资的饮料缩短他们的寿命，在仓库里跑来跑去，而这些仓库的非工会身份已经增加到他的钱堆里。</blockquote></p><p> It can’t. And who keeps us from seeing that simple, stark truth more effectively, more perniciously, than the Good Billionaire?</p><p><blockquote>它不能。谁比善良的亿万富翁更有效地、更有害地阻止我们看到这个简单、赤裸裸的真相？</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/13/opinion/warren-buffett-billionaire-taxes.html?searchResultPosition=1\">The New York Times</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/13/opinion/warren-buffett-billionaire-taxes.html?searchResultPosition=1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112731941","content_text":"Illustration by The New York Times; Photograph via Getty\nWarren Buffett appears to be the safest kind of billionaire: the good kind. Mr. Buffett is neither Zuckerbergian messiah nor Musky provocateur, neither Bezosist space cadet nor Sacklerian undertaker. He is, or seems to be, quiet, humble, indifferent to money, philanthropic and critical of the system that allowed him to rise. Years ago, a proposed tax increase was named after him.\nIt’s easy for people to think: If only members of the Sackler family were more like Mr. Buffett, imagine how many lives would have been saved. If only the billionaires who haven’t signed the Giving Pledge would give away as much as Mr. Buffett has pledged to, imagine the impact on the world. If only more billionaires would make use of the system without feeling the need to pervert it, so many of our troubles would vanish.\nSo I regret to inform you that Mr. Buffett is actually the most dangerous kind of billionaire we have. The worst billionaires are the Good Billionaires. The sort who make it seem like the problem is the distortion of the system when, in fact, the problem is the system.\nActually malevolent and disastrously negligent plutocrats get most of the attention. And when we hear about these Bad Billionaire exploits, it is possible to conclude from them that the system needs better policing, updated regulations and maybe slightly higher taxes. The system needs to be made to work again.\nBut as America slouches toward plutocracy, our problem isn’t the virtue level of billionaires. It’s a set of social arrangements that make it possible for anyone to gain and guard and keep so much wealth, even as millions of others lack for food, work, housing, health, connectivity, education, dignity and the occasion to pursue their happiness.\nThere is no way to be a billionaire in America without taking advantage of a system predicated on cruelty, a system whose tax code and labor laws and regulatory apparatus prioritize your needs above most people’s. Even noted Good Billionaire Mr. Buffett has profited from Coca-Cola’s sugary drinks, Amazon’s union busting, Chevron’s oil drilling, Clayton Homes’s predatory loans and, as the country learned recently, the failure to tax billionaires on their wealth.\nThe Good Billionaire myth took a hard blow in recent days when Mr. Buffett won a dubious distinction. A staggering exposé published by ProPublica revealed just how little the biggest plutocrats pay in taxes, despite mounting piles of wealth. And at the very top of that list of plutocrats — many of them with troubled reputations — was the cleanest, grandfatherliest plutocrat of them all: Mr. Buffett.\nProPublica’s story was unusual in that, for once, it was the Good Billionaire at the top of the naughty list. This was helpful, because it served to indict the system that makes him possible, even when it is working perfectly, wholly lawfully.\nFrom 2014 to 2018, Mr. Buffett’s wealth soared by $24.3 billion, according to ProPublica. (To underline, this is just the amount the fortune grew.) The amount of taxes Mr. Buffett paid over this period? $23.7 million. If middle-class Americans in their 40s enjoyed such a low effective tax rate, they would have paid a few dozen bucks per household over this same time period. Instead, as the ProPublica story notes, they paid around $62,000.\nImagine if Mr. Buffett had to pay the same fraction of the growth of his net worth that regular people do. Taxing that money could have helped pay for bridge repairs, mammograms, and free day care. More important — and this isn’t said enough — there is intrinsic value in shrinking gargantuan fortunes. The sway plutocrats have over public life is inconsistent with a one person, one vote democracy.\nThe important point here is that Mr. Buffett’s tax payments as detailed by ProPublica are fully legal. Though Mr. Buffett has called for changing the tax system, while we have the one we have, he will continue to benefit from the madness of taxing billionaires for their income, rather than their wealth, when their income is pretty much just a number they can construct.\nI asked Mr. Buffett last week, via his longtime secretary, Debbie Bosanek, if he could think of even one tax or accounting practice that he has come to regret. Sure, he may have followed the letter of the law. But was there any aspect of his patriotism or humanity that left him feeling guilty for hoarding so much untaxed when regular people pay so much in taxes? Though Ms. Bosanek responded to an initial inquiry, she declined to offer any such examples.\nIn a long statement last week, Mr. Buffett defended himself by pointing to his long advocacy for a fairer taxation system, and then he immediately told on himself by undermining the very idea of taxes in the same letter. “I believe the money will be of more use to society if disbursed philanthropically than if it is used to slightly reduce an ever-increasing U.S. debt.”\nIn other words: I believe in higher income taxes on people like me, but I’m highly organized to avoid having income to report, and I don’t really believe in taxes because I think I should decide how these surplus resources are spent.\nAnd this points to another way in which the Good Billionaire is hard to deal with. The crooks and the scoundrels and the people manifestly looking for quick P.R. highs come to philanthropy for the marketing payoff. When Goldman Sachs announces a new initiative on fighting the racial wealth gap despite having done little to repair the damage it did to Black homeowners in contributing to the 2008 financial meltdown, some may be fooled, but, more and more, many are not.\nSupposed Good Billionaires like Mr. Buffett and his friend Bill Gates are more complicated because they give real money. They may benefit from marketing but also seem to many people to be motivated by more than that, and they apply their smarts to the work.\nYet because of this, it is often the Good Billionaires who end up with the most illegitimate influence over public life. No one is asking members of the Sackler family for public health advice. But Mr. Gates has become a major policy voice on vaccines despite holding no elected position. Mr. Buffett, for his part, has shied away from that kind of lane hopping and richsplaining, but in donating his fortune to Mr. Gates’s foundation he has pumped up that undemocratic influence.\nMr. Buffett is almost the perfectly made billionaire for this moment in which, at last, many Americans are beginning to question not only corruptions of the system but the matter of whether billionaires should exist at all. He doesn’t do the things the worst of them do. He isn’t in it for what they’re in it for. He clearly must care about money, but he also kind of doesn’t care about money. Even in his generosity, he has avoided the imperial lording over that others cannot resist.\nAnd this is what makes him so troubling, because through him we are tempted into believing that a system can be defended that allows a man to accumulate more than $100 billion while people are sleeping, in hock to him, in his mobile homes, shortening their lives with the beverages he’s invested in, scampering around the warehouses whose nonunion status has redounded to his money pile.\nIt can’t. And who keeps us from seeing that simple, stark truth more effectively, more perniciously, than the Good Billionaire?","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BRK.B":0.9,"BRK.A":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2290,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184591145,"gmtCreate":1623717933687,"gmtModify":1634029699073,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"haha","listText":"haha","text":"haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184591145","repostId":"1126626020","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1967,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182042012,"gmtCreate":1623548804336,"gmtModify":1634031949720,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"jus faze","listText":"jus faze","text":"jus faze","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182042012","repostId":"2143788705","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":696,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":182043150,"gmtCreate":1623548679070,"gmtModify":1634031952621,"author":{"id":"3581807635057347","authorId":"3581807635057347","name":"HuatBee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fe02b78336d4bf9d376a5d113921817","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581807635057347","idStr":"3581807635057347"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"space travel all mumbo jumbo stuffs","listText":"space travel all mumbo jumbo stuffs","text":"space travel all mumbo jumbo stuffs","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182043150","repostId":"1143408374","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}