Ianer的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Ianer

Ianer

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

7关注

11粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-06-13

$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$2000s we used friendster,msn messenger, iqc. 2010s we used snapchat, facebook. The 20X0 we will be in a metaverse to communciate and socialise with one another. This will be the next big disrupt. Agree?

2021-06-04

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$Think of TSLA as a technology company. If yr mindset is fix on them been just a automotive company, then you're not seeing the bigger future. TSLA, in coming years, will be the greatest and biggest company on this planet. Agree?

2021-08-10

Data dont lie. We all know how the media works. They dont show the full data as compared to other makers. Anyway, it is good that the media and the bears continue to smear tesla. It shows that they are afraid of Tesla dominance. Uo my conviction again!

Tesla Says Fires Are 11x Less Likely For Its Vehicles Compared To The Average US Vehicle<blockquote>特斯拉表示，其车辆发生火灾的可能性比美国普通车辆低11倍</blockquote>

2021-06-26

700 is coming in July! Lucky 7!

2021-06-25

Tts apple to peanut comparison. nio still have a lot to prove.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-25

SE is a perfectly execute company with 3 business segment targeting the growth market. Gaming will continue to be huge. E commerce is still largely untap in Asia. Digital currency will disrupt traditional fiance system. Cant wait.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-28

Finally some sensible comment here.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-21

Whether it is "true" profit or not. The cold hard fact is Tesla is getting the cash flow postive and this bonus will boost their financial even stronger than before.

Tesla’s Profitability and the Surprising Thing That Could Threaten It<blockquote>特斯拉的盈利能力以及可能威胁它的令人惊讶的事情</blockquote>

2021-06-28

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$July is going to be great!

2021-06-26

Thats fine. Good initiative. I believe their database had capture enough data to determine the need for recall. Anyhow, the FUD will scream again on this. Pls rmbr. Recall ALWAYS happen and more with othet automotive company.

Tesla recalls some imported and domestic Model 3 and Model Y in China<blockquote>特斯拉在华召回部分进口及国产Model 3和Model Y</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3582704169214897","uuid":"3582704169214897","gmtCreate":1619611663650,"gmtModify":1623227632471,"name":"Ianer","pinyin":"ianer","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":11,"headSize":7,"tweetSize":112,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":3,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.09.17","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":163936659,"gmtCreate":1623856011871,"gmtModify":1634026973141,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great article for those Sea limited investors.&nbsp;https://seekingalpha.com/article/4394430-how-seas-garena-fuels-shopee-and-seamoney","listText":"Great article for those Sea limited investors.&nbsp;https://seekingalpha.com/article/4394430-how-seas-garena-fuels-shopee-and-seamoney","text":"Great article for those Sea limited investors. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4394430-how-seas-garena-fuels-shopee-and-seamoney","images":[],"top":2,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/163936659","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2984,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":690818154,"gmtCreate":1639653703986,"gmtModify":1639653704172,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Long term yes.","listText":"Long term yes.","text":"Long term yes.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690818154","repostId":"2191559917","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3217,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":860123870,"gmtCreate":1632146963590,"gmtModify":1632802532603,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hw much isit anyway? Or hw many cars have they produced?","listText":"Hw much isit anyway? Or hw many cars have they produced?","text":"Hw much isit anyway? Or hw many cars have they produced?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/860123870","repostId":"1183265438","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1648,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":834595374,"gmtCreate":1629812318098,"gmtModify":1633682277389,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls! Elon was referring to the current FSD 9.2 and not the FSD itself. Dont quote something out of the context!","listText":"Pls! Elon was referring to the current FSD 9.2 and not the FSD itself. Dont quote something out of the context!","text":"Pls! Elon was referring to the current FSD 9.2 and not the FSD itself. Dont quote something out of the context!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/834595374","repostId":"1162867085","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1162867085","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629809990,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1162867085?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-24 20:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla’s Musk Says FSD Actually Not That Great. Why He’s Actually Wrong.<blockquote>特斯拉的Musk表示FSD实际上并没有那么好。为什么他实际上是错的。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162867085","media":"Barrons","summary":"Evaluating car companies’ claims about self-driving cars is getting harder, rather than easier. Now ","content":"<p>Evaluating car companies’ claims about self-driving cars is getting harder, rather than easier. Now Tesla CEO Elon Musk is casting doubt on his own company’s progress.</p><p><blockquote>评估汽车公司关于自动驾驶汽车的说法变得越来越困难，而不是更容易。现在，特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk对自己公司的进展表示怀疑。</blockquote></p><p> Musk tweeted out Monday the latest versions of Tesla’s (ticker: TSLA) full self driving software–the best version of his company’s driver assistance features–is “actually not great.”</p><p><blockquote>马斯克周一在推特上表示，特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）全自动驾驶软件的最新版本——马斯克公司驾驶员辅助功能的最佳版本——“实际上并不好”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95ec0454d5d748a9de0735945ee972cb\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"871\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> It’s a surprising–and possibly odd–revelation. Manufacturers are racing to build the best autonomous vehicles, but for people without advanced engineering degrees, judging who has the best systems has become nearly impossible. Autonomous-driving features are just too new and the systems are changing too rapidly.</p><p><blockquote>这是一个令人惊讶的——也可能是奇怪的——发现。制造商正在竞相制造最好的自动驾驶汽车，但对于没有高级工程学位的人来说，判断谁拥有最好的系统几乎变得不可能。自动驾驶功能太新，系统变化太快。</blockquote></p><p> The job for investors, right now, isn’t to dissect tweets. It is to understand exactly who is saying what about car makers’ competing autonomous-driving systems. Learning the bull and bear arguments is enough for now. Figuring out who is leading and what it means for the stocks of the car makers can come later.</p><p><blockquote>投资者现在的工作不是剖析推文。这是为了准确了解谁在谈论汽车制造商竞争的自动驾驶系统。现在学习牛市和熊市的论点就足够了。弄清楚谁是领导者以及这对汽车制造商的股票意味着什么可以稍后再做。</blockquote></p><p> The highly anticipated&nbsp;Tesla(ticker: TSLA)&nbsp;A.I. Day&nbsp;was supposed to shed light on the topic of autonomous driving. Instead, it opened a Pandora’s box of questions that need answering.</p><p><blockquote>备受期待的特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）A.I.这一天本应阐明自动驾驶的话题。相反，它打开了一个需要回答的潘多拉魔盒。</blockquote></p><p> What investors really wanted to know was when drivers will be able to text and drive safely on highways without fear of getting a traffic ticket. That answer wasn’t forthcoming. Instead, investors were asked to digest the importance of computer- designed self-driving simulations, machine learning, and cloud-based A.I. training technology. The detail was arcane.</p><p><blockquote>投资者真正想知道的是，司机何时能够在高速公路上安全地发短信和驾驶，而不用担心收到交通罚单。这个答案并没有出现。相反，投资者被要求消化计算机设计的自动驾驶模拟、机器学习和基于云的人工智能的重要性。培训技术。细节很神秘。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla bulls, however, came away from the event blown away by Tesla’s A.I. prowess and the improvements to its autonomous-driving features. New Street Research analyst&nbsp;Pierre Ferragu&nbsp;wrote Monday that Tesla is 10 years ahead of the competition in “real-world” artificial intelligence. He believes Tesla’s autonomous- driving subscription sales can generate about $23,000 in gross profit per vehicle over a 10-year span. That is significantly more than the roughly $7,000 in gross profit Tesla makes from selling a car.</p><p><blockquote>然而，特斯拉公牛队在这场比赛中被特斯拉的人工智能所震撼。实力及其自动驾驶功能的改进。New Street Research分析师Pierre Ferragu周一写道，特斯拉在“现实世界”人工智能的竞争中领先10年。他认为，特斯拉的自动驾驶订阅销售可以在10年内为每辆车带来约23,000美元的毛利润。这远远高于特斯拉销售汽车所获得的约7,000美元的毛利润。</blockquote></p><p> He rates Tesla stock at Buy and has a target of $900 for the stock price. Shares closed Monday at $706.30, up 3.8%.</p><p><blockquote>他对特斯拉股票的评级为买入，股价目标为900美元。周一股价收于706.30美元，上涨3.8%。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla bears, on the other hand, are convinced that Tesla’s claims about self- driving cars are overstated and that other companies are doing a better job developing self-driving technology.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，看空特斯拉的人确信，特斯拉关于自动驾驶汽车的说法被夸大了，其他公司在开发自动驾驶技术方面做得更好。</blockquote></p><p> The bears’ belief is partly rooted in two reports from the research firmGuidehouse, which publishes automated-driving “leaderboards.” Tesla ranked dead last in the 2020 and 2021 reports.</p><p><blockquote>看空者的信念部分源于研究公司Guidehouse的两份报告，该公司发布自动驾驶“排行榜”。特斯拉在2020年和2021年的报告中排名垫底。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75c32dac9eacc1a076597ae098e1ea33\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"889\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> That might feel odd, given that Tesla CEO Elon Musk often talks about how advanced Tesla’s self-driving offerings are. But the Guidehouse rankings are partly based on vision systems and partnerships, two areas where Tesla doesn’t score well. The company doesn’t use laser-based radar, while other makers of self-driving cars do. And it doesn’t enter partnerships, doing everything in house.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk经常谈论特斯拉的自动驾驶产品有多先进，这可能会让人感到奇怪。但Guidehouse的排名部分基于视觉系统和合作伙伴关系，这两个领域特斯拉得分不高。该公司不使用基于激光的雷达，而其他自动驾驶汽车制造商则使用。它不加入合作伙伴关系，在内部做所有事情。</blockquote></p><p> It is possible that bulls and bears are both right and are talking past each other. Waymo, for instance, leads in the Guidehouse rankings. It has deployed fully autonomous robotaxis in Arizona. That is quite a feat.</p><p><blockquote>多头和空头有可能都是对的，并且正在互相谈论。例如，Waymo在Guidehouse排名中领先。它已经在亚利桑那州部署了全自动机器人出租车。这是一个相当大的壮举。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s systems aren’t good enough to be robotaxis. They qualify as level 2 autonomy, which means drivers must be engaged at all times. But the systems enabling the Waymo robotaxi can cost upwards of $100,000 per vehicle. That is too pricey for consumer vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的系统还不足以成为机器人出租车。它们符合2级自动驾驶资格，这意味着驾驶员必须始终参与其中。但支持Waymo robotaxi的系统每辆车的成本可能高达10万美元。这对于消费汽车来说太贵了。</blockquote></p><p> In October 2020,<i>Consumer Reports</i>&nbsp;ranked the automated-driving systems available to, well, consumers. Overall, Tesla’s automated driver system ranked second to&nbsp;General Motors(GM). Tesla scored highest on capability and ease of use, but ranked poorly on keeping the driver engaged.</p><p><blockquote>2020年10月，<i>消费者报告</i>对消费者可用的自动驾驶系统进行了排名。总体而言，特斯拉的自动驾驶系统排名第二，仅次于通用汽车（GM）。特斯拉在功能和易用性方面得分最高，但在保持驾驶员参与度方面排名较差。</blockquote></p><p> One reason for that low score might be that Tesla’s automated-driving systems aren’t “hands free” solutions. Drivers need to keep their hands on, or touching, the steering wheel to keep the system on. There are “hands free” systems that use interior cameras to make sure a driver’s eyes are on the road at all times.</p><p><blockquote>得分较低的原因之一可能是特斯拉的自动驾驶系统不是“免提”解决方案。驾驶员需要将手放在或触摸方向盘上以保持系统打开。有“免提”系统使用内部摄像头来确保驾驶员的眼睛始终在路上。</blockquote></p><p> Camera monitoring might be better than haptic steering-wheel feedback. That is a debate for car companies and regulators.</p><p><blockquote>摄像头监控可能比触觉方向盘反馈更好。这是汽车公司和监管机构的争论。</blockquote></p><p> Practically speaking, hands free and hands required isn’t the basis for competitive differentiation. All the systems on offer today, hands free or not, require drivers to be engaged 100% of the time.</p><p><blockquote>实际上，解放双手和需要双手并不是竞争差异化的基础。如今提供的所有系统，无论是否免提，都要求驾驶员100%的时间投入。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Autonomous driving studies and reports will proliferate in coming years. Each will have different criteria for judging what is best. Eventually, investors will probably have to test out autonomous-driving systems for themselves. That way they won’t fall victim to ratings criteria that aren’t explicitly defined.</p><p><blockquote>自动驾驶研究和报告将在未来几年激增。每个人都有不同的标准来判断什么是最好的。最终，投资者可能不得不亲自测试自动驾驶系统。这样他们就不会成为没有明确定义的评级标准的受害者。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock is about flat so far in 2021. The&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;are up 19% and 15%, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>2021年迄今为止，特斯拉股价基本持平。标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数分别上涨19%和15%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla’s Musk Says FSD Actually Not That Great. Why He’s Actually Wrong.<blockquote>特斯拉的Musk表示FSD实际上并没有那么好。为什么他实际上是错的。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla’s Musk Says FSD Actually Not That Great. Why He’s Actually Wrong.<blockquote>特斯拉的Musk表示FSD实际上并没有那么好。为什么他实际上是错的。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-24 20:59</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Evaluating car companies’ claims about self-driving cars is getting harder, rather than easier. Now Tesla CEO Elon Musk is casting doubt on his own company’s progress.</p><p><blockquote>评估汽车公司关于自动驾驶汽车的说法变得越来越困难，而不是更容易。现在，特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk对自己公司的进展表示怀疑。</blockquote></p><p> Musk tweeted out Monday the latest versions of Tesla’s (ticker: TSLA) full self driving software–the best version of his company’s driver assistance features–is “actually not great.”</p><p><blockquote>马斯克周一在推特上表示，特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）全自动驾驶软件的最新版本——马斯克公司驾驶员辅助功能的最佳版本——“实际上并不好”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95ec0454d5d748a9de0735945ee972cb\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"871\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> It’s a surprising–and possibly odd–revelation. Manufacturers are racing to build the best autonomous vehicles, but for people without advanced engineering degrees, judging who has the best systems has become nearly impossible. Autonomous-driving features are just too new and the systems are changing too rapidly.</p><p><blockquote>这是一个令人惊讶的——也可能是奇怪的——发现。制造商正在竞相制造最好的自动驾驶汽车，但对于没有高级工程学位的人来说，判断谁拥有最好的系统几乎变得不可能。自动驾驶功能太新，系统变化太快。</blockquote></p><p> The job for investors, right now, isn’t to dissect tweets. It is to understand exactly who is saying what about car makers’ competing autonomous-driving systems. Learning the bull and bear arguments is enough for now. Figuring out who is leading and what it means for the stocks of the car makers can come later.</p><p><blockquote>投资者现在的工作不是剖析推文。这是为了准确了解谁在谈论汽车制造商竞争的自动驾驶系统。现在学习牛市和熊市的论点就足够了。弄清楚谁是领导者以及这对汽车制造商的股票意味着什么可以稍后再做。</blockquote></p><p> The highly anticipated&nbsp;Tesla(ticker: TSLA)&nbsp;A.I. Day&nbsp;was supposed to shed light on the topic of autonomous driving. Instead, it opened a Pandora’s box of questions that need answering.</p><p><blockquote>备受期待的特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）A.I.这一天本应阐明自动驾驶的话题。相反，它打开了一个需要回答的潘多拉魔盒。</blockquote></p><p> What investors really wanted to know was when drivers will be able to text and drive safely on highways without fear of getting a traffic ticket. That answer wasn’t forthcoming. Instead, investors were asked to digest the importance of computer- designed self-driving simulations, machine learning, and cloud-based A.I. training technology. The detail was arcane.</p><p><blockquote>投资者真正想知道的是，司机何时能够在高速公路上安全地发短信和驾驶，而不用担心收到交通罚单。这个答案并没有出现。相反，投资者被要求消化计算机设计的自动驾驶模拟、机器学习和基于云的人工智能的重要性。培训技术。细节很神秘。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla bulls, however, came away from the event blown away by Tesla’s A.I. prowess and the improvements to its autonomous-driving features. New Street Research analyst&nbsp;Pierre Ferragu&nbsp;wrote Monday that Tesla is 10 years ahead of the competition in “real-world” artificial intelligence. He believes Tesla’s autonomous- driving subscription sales can generate about $23,000 in gross profit per vehicle over a 10-year span. That is significantly more than the roughly $7,000 in gross profit Tesla makes from selling a car.</p><p><blockquote>然而，特斯拉公牛队在这场比赛中被特斯拉的人工智能所震撼。实力及其自动驾驶功能的改进。New Street Research分析师Pierre Ferragu周一写道，特斯拉在“现实世界”人工智能的竞争中领先10年。他认为，特斯拉的自动驾驶订阅销售可以在10年内为每辆车带来约23,000美元的毛利润。这远远高于特斯拉销售汽车所获得的约7,000美元的毛利润。</blockquote></p><p> He rates Tesla stock at Buy and has a target of $900 for the stock price. Shares closed Monday at $706.30, up 3.8%.</p><p><blockquote>他对特斯拉股票的评级为买入，股价目标为900美元。周一股价收于706.30美元，上涨3.8%。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla bears, on the other hand, are convinced that Tesla’s claims about self- driving cars are overstated and that other companies are doing a better job developing self-driving technology.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，看空特斯拉的人确信，特斯拉关于自动驾驶汽车的说法被夸大了，其他公司在开发自动驾驶技术方面做得更好。</blockquote></p><p> The bears’ belief is partly rooted in two reports from the research firmGuidehouse, which publishes automated-driving “leaderboards.” Tesla ranked dead last in the 2020 and 2021 reports.</p><p><blockquote>看空者的信念部分源于研究公司Guidehouse的两份报告，该公司发布自动驾驶“排行榜”。特斯拉在2020年和2021年的报告中排名垫底。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75c32dac9eacc1a076597ae098e1ea33\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"889\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> That might feel odd, given that Tesla CEO Elon Musk often talks about how advanced Tesla’s self-driving offerings are. But the Guidehouse rankings are partly based on vision systems and partnerships, two areas where Tesla doesn’t score well. The company doesn’t use laser-based radar, while other makers of self-driving cars do. And it doesn’t enter partnerships, doing everything in house.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk经常谈论特斯拉的自动驾驶产品有多先进，这可能会让人感到奇怪。但Guidehouse的排名部分基于视觉系统和合作伙伴关系，这两个领域特斯拉得分不高。该公司不使用基于激光的雷达，而其他自动驾驶汽车制造商则使用。它不加入合作伙伴关系，在内部做所有事情。</blockquote></p><p> It is possible that bulls and bears are both right and are talking past each other. Waymo, for instance, leads in the Guidehouse rankings. It has deployed fully autonomous robotaxis in Arizona. That is quite a feat.</p><p><blockquote>多头和空头有可能都是对的，并且正在互相谈论。例如，Waymo在Guidehouse排名中领先。它已经在亚利桑那州部署了全自动机器人出租车。这是一个相当大的壮举。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s systems aren’t good enough to be robotaxis. They qualify as level 2 autonomy, which means drivers must be engaged at all times. But the systems enabling the Waymo robotaxi can cost upwards of $100,000 per vehicle. That is too pricey for consumer vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的系统还不足以成为机器人出租车。它们符合2级自动驾驶资格，这意味着驾驶员必须始终参与其中。但支持Waymo robotaxi的系统每辆车的成本可能高达10万美元。这对于消费汽车来说太贵了。</blockquote></p><p> In October 2020,<i>Consumer Reports</i>&nbsp;ranked the automated-driving systems available to, well, consumers. Overall, Tesla’s automated driver system ranked second to&nbsp;General Motors(GM). Tesla scored highest on capability and ease of use, but ranked poorly on keeping the driver engaged.</p><p><blockquote>2020年10月，<i>消费者报告</i>对消费者可用的自动驾驶系统进行了排名。总体而言，特斯拉的自动驾驶系统排名第二，仅次于通用汽车（GM）。特斯拉在功能和易用性方面得分最高，但在保持驾驶员参与度方面排名较差。</blockquote></p><p> One reason for that low score might be that Tesla’s automated-driving systems aren’t “hands free” solutions. Drivers need to keep their hands on, or touching, the steering wheel to keep the system on. There are “hands free” systems that use interior cameras to make sure a driver’s eyes are on the road at all times.</p><p><blockquote>得分较低的原因之一可能是特斯拉的自动驾驶系统不是“免提”解决方案。驾驶员需要将手放在或触摸方向盘上以保持系统打开。有“免提”系统使用内部摄像头来确保驾驶员的眼睛始终在路上。</blockquote></p><p> Camera monitoring might be better than haptic steering-wheel feedback. That is a debate for car companies and regulators.</p><p><blockquote>摄像头监控可能比触觉方向盘反馈更好。这是汽车公司和监管机构的争论。</blockquote></p><p> Practically speaking, hands free and hands required isn’t the basis for competitive differentiation. All the systems on offer today, hands free or not, require drivers to be engaged 100% of the time.</p><p><blockquote>实际上，解放双手和需要双手并不是竞争差异化的基础。如今提供的所有系统，无论是否免提，都要求驾驶员100%的时间投入。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Autonomous driving studies and reports will proliferate in coming years. Each will have different criteria for judging what is best. Eventually, investors will probably have to test out autonomous-driving systems for themselves. That way they won’t fall victim to ratings criteria that aren’t explicitly defined.</p><p><blockquote>自动驾驶研究和报告将在未来几年激增。每个人都有不同的标准来判断什么是最好的。最终，投资者可能不得不亲自测试自动驾驶系统。这样他们就不会成为没有明确定义的评级标准的受害者。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock is about flat so far in 2021. The&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;are up 19% and 15%, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>2021年迄今为止，特斯拉股价基本持平。标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数分别上涨19%和15%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-ai-autonomous-vehicle-technology-51629756011?mod=hp_LEAD_3\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-ai-autonomous-vehicle-technology-51629756011?mod=hp_LEAD_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162867085","content_text":"Evaluating car companies’ claims about self-driving cars is getting harder, rather than easier. Now Tesla CEO Elon Musk is casting doubt on his own company’s progress.\nMusk tweeted out Monday the latest versions of Tesla’s (ticker: TSLA) full self driving software–the best version of his company’s driver assistance features–is “actually not great.”\n\nIt’s a surprising–and possibly odd–revelation. Manufacturers are racing to build the best autonomous vehicles, but for people without advanced engineering degrees, judging who has the best systems has become nearly impossible. Autonomous-driving features are just too new and the systems are changing too rapidly.\nThe job for investors, right now, isn’t to dissect tweets. It is to understand exactly who is saying what about car makers’ competing autonomous-driving systems. Learning the bull and bear arguments is enough for now. Figuring out who is leading and what it means for the stocks of the car makers can come later.\nThe highly anticipated Tesla(ticker: TSLA) A.I. Day was supposed to shed light on the topic of autonomous driving. Instead, it opened a Pandora’s box of questions that need answering.\nWhat investors really wanted to know was when drivers will be able to text and drive safely on highways without fear of getting a traffic ticket. That answer wasn’t forthcoming. Instead, investors were asked to digest the importance of computer- designed self-driving simulations, machine learning, and cloud-based A.I. training technology. The detail was arcane.\nTesla bulls, however, came away from the event blown away by Tesla’s A.I. prowess and the improvements to its autonomous-driving features. New Street Research analyst Pierre Ferragu wrote Monday that Tesla is 10 years ahead of the competition in “real-world” artificial intelligence. He believes Tesla’s autonomous- driving subscription sales can generate about $23,000 in gross profit per vehicle over a 10-year span. That is significantly more than the roughly $7,000 in gross profit Tesla makes from selling a car.\nHe rates Tesla stock at Buy and has a target of $900 for the stock price. Shares closed Monday at $706.30, up 3.8%.\nTesla bears, on the other hand, are convinced that Tesla’s claims about self- driving cars are overstated and that other companies are doing a better job developing self-driving technology.\nThe bears’ belief is partly rooted in two reports from the research firmGuidehouse, which publishes automated-driving “leaderboards.” Tesla ranked dead last in the 2020 and 2021 reports.\n\nThat might feel odd, given that Tesla CEO Elon Musk often talks about how advanced Tesla’s self-driving offerings are. But the Guidehouse rankings are partly based on vision systems and partnerships, two areas where Tesla doesn’t score well. The company doesn’t use laser-based radar, while other makers of self-driving cars do. And it doesn’t enter partnerships, doing everything in house.\nIt is possible that bulls and bears are both right and are talking past each other. Waymo, for instance, leads in the Guidehouse rankings. It has deployed fully autonomous robotaxis in Arizona. That is quite a feat.\nTesla’s systems aren’t good enough to be robotaxis. They qualify as level 2 autonomy, which means drivers must be engaged at all times. But the systems enabling the Waymo robotaxi can cost upwards of $100,000 per vehicle. That is too pricey for consumer vehicles.\nIn October 2020,Consumer Reports ranked the automated-driving systems available to, well, consumers. Overall, Tesla’s automated driver system ranked second to General Motors(GM). Tesla scored highest on capability and ease of use, but ranked poorly on keeping the driver engaged.\nOne reason for that low score might be that Tesla’s automated-driving systems aren’t “hands free” solutions. Drivers need to keep their hands on, or touching, the steering wheel to keep the system on. There are “hands free” systems that use interior cameras to make sure a driver’s eyes are on the road at all times.\nCamera monitoring might be better than haptic steering-wheel feedback. That is a debate for car companies and regulators.\nPractically speaking, hands free and hands required isn’t the basis for competitive differentiation. All the systems on offer today, hands free or not, require drivers to be engaged 100% of the time.\nAutonomous driving studies and reports will proliferate in coming years. Each will have different criteria for judging what is best. Eventually, investors will probably have to test out autonomous-driving systems for themselves. That way they won’t fall victim to ratings criteria that aren’t explicitly defined.\nTesla stock is about flat so far in 2021. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average are up 19% and 15%, respectively.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1867,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894052343,"gmtCreate":1628779134482,"gmtModify":1633689547950,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Joke from these ICE maker","listText":"Joke from these ICE maker","text":"Joke from these ICE maker","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894052343","repostId":"2158528289","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1944,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896862506,"gmtCreate":1628570027505,"gmtModify":1633746063773,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Data dont lie.&nbsp;We all know how the media works. They dont show the full data as compared to other makers. Anyway, it is good that the media and the bears continue to smear tesla. It shows that they are afraid of Tesla dominance. Uo my conviction again!","listText":"Data dont lie.&nbsp;We all know how the media works. They dont show the full data as compared to other makers. Anyway, it is good that the media and the bears continue to smear tesla. It shows that they are afraid of Tesla dominance. Uo my conviction again!","text":"Data dont lie. We all know how the media works. They dont show the full data as compared to other makers. Anyway, it is good that the media and the bears continue to smear tesla. It shows that they are afraid of Tesla dominance. Uo my conviction again!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896862506","repostId":"1112813252","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1112813252","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628557163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1112813252?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-10 08:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Says Fires Are 11x Less Likely For Its Vehicles Compared To The Average US Vehicle<blockquote>特斯拉表示，其车辆发生火灾的可能性比美国普通车辆低11倍</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112813252","media":"Benzinga","summary":"While articles covering a fire involving a Tesla Motors vehicle seem to be common, news of non-elect","content":"<p>While articles covering a&nbsp;fire involving a&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> vehicle&nbsp;seem to be common,&nbsp;news of&nbsp;non-electric vehicles&nbsp;burning&nbsp;is&nbsp;rare, although there were an estimated&nbsp;212,500 vehicle fires&nbsp;in 2018 alone, according to the&nbsp;<b>National Fire Protection Association</b>&nbsp;(NFPA).</p><p><blockquote>而报道火灾的文章涉及<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>车辆似乎很常见，但非电动汽车燃烧的消息很少，尽管仅在2018年就估计有212,500起车辆火灾<b>国家消防协会</b>（NFPA）。</blockquote></p><p> Now Tesla is releasing new data in its2020 impact report, showing&nbsp;<b>fires in its vehicles are 11x less likely</b>&nbsp;<b>than other vehicles in the U.S.</b>&nbsp;Tesla points out that while vehicle fires in the media often point to EVs, the reasoning may be the rarity of an electric vehicle fire, rather than the prevalence.</p><p><blockquote>现在特斯拉在其2020年影响报告中发布了新数据，显示<b>其车辆发生火灾的可能性降低了11倍</b> <b>比美国的其他车辆。</b>特斯拉指出，虽然媒体上的车辆火灾经常指向电动汽车，但原因可能是电动汽车火灾的罕见性，而不是普遍性。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla's data shows there was one Tesla fire every 205 million miles from 2012 to 2020. This is compared with data from the NFPA showing on average there is a vehicle fire every 19 million miles. Tesla also points out that its vehicle fire data include fires from structures, arson and other reasons, as to be comparable with NFPA data.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的数据显示，从2012年到2020年，每2.05亿英里就会发生一起特斯拉火灾。相比之下，NFPA的数据显示，平均每1900万英里就会发生一起车辆火灾。特斯拉还指出，其车辆火灾数据包括建筑物、纵火和其他原因引起的火灾，以便与NFPA的数据具有可比性。</blockquote></p><p> The company says it is continually working to improve the safety of its cars, including modifications to battery chemistry and enclosures to minimize fire risk, as well as maximize fire containment in the event of a fire. Tesla also provides&nbsp;ample information&nbsp;for first responders to be ready to have the fastest and most effective response in a fire event.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示，它正在不断努力提高汽车的安全性，包括修改电池化学和外壳，以最大限度地降低火灾风险，并在发生火灾时最大限度地控制火灾。特斯拉还为急救人员提供了充足的信息，以便在火灾事件中做出最快、最有效的反应。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Says Fires Are 11x Less Likely For Its Vehicles Compared To The Average US Vehicle<blockquote>特斯拉表示，其车辆发生火灾的可能性比美国普通车辆低11倍</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Says Fires Are 11x Less Likely For Its Vehicles Compared To The Average US Vehicle<blockquote>特斯拉表示，其车辆发生火灾的可能性比美国普通车辆低11倍</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-10 08:59</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>While articles covering a&nbsp;fire involving a&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> vehicle&nbsp;seem to be common,&nbsp;news of&nbsp;non-electric vehicles&nbsp;burning&nbsp;is&nbsp;rare, although there were an estimated&nbsp;212,500 vehicle fires&nbsp;in 2018 alone, according to the&nbsp;<b>National Fire Protection Association</b>&nbsp;(NFPA).</p><p><blockquote>而报道火灾的文章涉及<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>车辆似乎很常见，但非电动汽车燃烧的消息很少，尽管仅在2018年就估计有212,500起车辆火灾<b>国家消防协会</b>（NFPA）。</blockquote></p><p> Now Tesla is releasing new data in its2020 impact report, showing&nbsp;<b>fires in its vehicles are 11x less likely</b>&nbsp;<b>than other vehicles in the U.S.</b>&nbsp;Tesla points out that while vehicle fires in the media often point to EVs, the reasoning may be the rarity of an electric vehicle fire, rather than the prevalence.</p><p><blockquote>现在特斯拉在其2020年影响报告中发布了新数据，显示<b>其车辆发生火灾的可能性降低了11倍</b> <b>比美国的其他车辆。</b>特斯拉指出，虽然媒体上的车辆火灾经常指向电动汽车，但原因可能是电动汽车火灾的罕见性，而不是普遍性。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla's data shows there was one Tesla fire every 205 million miles from 2012 to 2020. This is compared with data from the NFPA showing on average there is a vehicle fire every 19 million miles. Tesla also points out that its vehicle fire data include fires from structures, arson and other reasons, as to be comparable with NFPA data.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的数据显示，从2012年到2020年，每2.05亿英里就会发生一起特斯拉火灾。相比之下，NFPA的数据显示，平均每1900万英里就会发生一起车辆火灾。特斯拉还指出，其车辆火灾数据包括建筑物、纵火和其他原因引起的火灾，以便与NFPA的数据具有可比性。</blockquote></p><p> The company says it is continually working to improve the safety of its cars, including modifications to battery chemistry and enclosures to minimize fire risk, as well as maximize fire containment in the event of a fire. Tesla also provides&nbsp;ample information&nbsp;for first responders to be ready to have the fastest and most effective response in a fire event.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示，它正在不断努力提高汽车的安全性，包括修改电池化学和外壳，以最大限度地降低火灾风险，并在发生火灾时最大限度地控制火灾。特斯拉还为急救人员提供了充足的信息，以便在火灾事件中做出最快、最有效的反应。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112813252","content_text":"While articles covering a fire involving a Tesla Motors vehicle seem to be common, news of non-electric vehicles burning is rare, although there were an estimated 212,500 vehicle fires in 2018 alone, according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).\nNow Tesla is releasing new data in its2020 impact report, showing fires in its vehicles are 11x less likely than other vehicles in the U.S. Tesla points out that while vehicle fires in the media often point to EVs, the reasoning may be the rarity of an electric vehicle fire, rather than the prevalence.\nTesla's data shows there was one Tesla fire every 205 million miles from 2012 to 2020. This is compared with data from the NFPA showing on average there is a vehicle fire every 19 million miles. Tesla also points out that its vehicle fire data include fires from structures, arson and other reasons, as to be comparable with NFPA data.\nThe company says it is continually working to improve the safety of its cars, including modifications to battery chemistry and enclosures to minimize fire risk, as well as maximize fire containment in the event of a fire. Tesla also provides ample information for first responders to be ready to have the fastest and most effective response in a fire event.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3831,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3479274702625278","authorId":"3479274702625278","name":"老夫追涨杀跌","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d8be38e6bbbfa27d16721be9a4e59b","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3479274702625278","idStr":"3479274702625278"},"content":"如果特斯拉不能起来，那么这个赛道又有哪个企业能成？","text":"如果特斯拉不能起来，那么这个赛道又有哪个企业能成？","html":"如果特斯拉不能起来，那么这个赛道又有哪个企业能成？"},{"author":{"id":"9000000000000221","authorId":"9000000000000221","name":"搞钱树","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82edc4968feb7c0c481f5ad38d9a498b","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"9000000000000221","idStr":"9000000000000221"},"content":"嗯，不明白特斯拉价值的人就会被洗出来。","text":"嗯，不明白特斯拉价值的人就会被洗出来。","html":"嗯，不明白特斯拉价值的人就会被洗出来。"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890757959,"gmtCreate":1628137101771,"gmtModify":1633753221591,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"&nbsp;ICE car will be like the horse in the early 1900s. It will become more like&nbsp;a collectible or hobby or leisure sports.&nbsp;","listText":"&nbsp;ICE car will be like the horse in the early 1900s. It will become more like&nbsp;a collectible or hobby or leisure sports.&nbsp;","text":"ICE car will be like the horse in the early 1900s. It will become more like a collectible or hobby or leisure sports.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890757959","repostId":"1169931259","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890993143,"gmtCreate":1628073130082,"gmtModify":1633753868772,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"So who are the competitors? Tesla is 5 yrs ahead all of them!&nbsp;","listText":"So who are the competitors? Tesla is 5 yrs ahead all of them!&nbsp;","text":"So who are the competitors? Tesla is 5 yrs ahead all of them!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890993143","repostId":"1195860961","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1195860961","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628060045,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1195860961?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 14:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Reasons Tesla Stock Is Currently Overvalued<blockquote>特斯拉股票目前被高估的3个原因</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195860961","media":"Investing.com","summary":"Summary:\n\nAfter a remarkable rally last year, Tesla stock has lost its momentum.\nThe stock’s tepid r","content":"<p><b>Summary:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>摘要：</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>After a remarkable rally last year, Tesla stock has lost its momentum.</li>  <li>The stock’s tepid reaction to impressive Q2 earnings shows that the bull case is weakening.</li>  <li>Chip shortages, rising competition could keep Tesla under pressure this year.</li> </ul> Lately, Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) shares seem to have lost their magic. The stock no longer reacts wildly to every positive development, disappointing investors who made fortunes while staying faithful to the world’s largest electric car-maker.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>经过去年的显着上涨后，特斯拉股价已经失去了动力。</li><li>该股对令人印象深刻的第二季度盈利反应不温不火，表明牛市正在减弱。</li><li>芯片短缺、竞争加剧可能会让特斯拉今年面临压力。</li></ul>最近，特斯拉（纳斯达克：TSLA）的股票似乎失去了魔力。该股不再对每一个积极的发展做出疯狂的反应，这让那些在忠于这家全球最大电动汽车制造商的同时发财的投资者感到失望。</blockquote></p><p> The latest example of this dampening optimism came when Tesla announced itsquarterly earningson July 26. The company’s shares fell more than 4% after the earnings report, which handedly beat analysts’ consensus estimates.</p><p><blockquote>这种令人沮丧的乐观情绪的最新例子是特斯拉7月26日公布的季度收益。财报发布后，该公司股价下跌超过4%，大幅超出分析师的普遍预期。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae1d0e8a03c4269ff0c91bcaaf57e87d\" tg-width=\"1412\" tg-height=\"1172\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Tesla Weekly Chart.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>特斯拉周线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> During the quarter, in which the California-based car-maker produced a record 201,250 vehicles, its profit more than tripled to $1.45 a share on an adjusted basis, beating the $0.97 average analysts had estimated. It was also the company’s eighth straight profitable quarter.</p><p><blockquote>本季度，这家总部位于加州的汽车制造商生产了创纪录的201,250辆汽车，调整后的利润增长了两倍多，达到每股1.45美元，超过了分析师平均预期的0.97美元。这也是该公司连续第八个季度盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla's net income in the second quarter was roughly equal to the prior four quarters combined. The company reported revenue of roughly $12 billion for the period that ended June 30, nearly double the amount in the corresponding period a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉第二季度的净利润大致相当于前四个季度的总和。该公司报告截至6月30日的期间收入约为120亿美元，几乎是去年同期的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> Despite this strong earnings momentum, the stock didn’t jump the way it once did on every shred of positive news. TSLA is up less than 6% during the past five days as of yesterday's close. From its record high in January, Tesla shares are down almost 23%.</p><p><blockquote>尽管盈利势头强劲，但该股并没有像以前那样因每一个利好消息而上涨。截至昨天收盘，特斯拉在过去五天内上涨了不到6%。特斯拉股价较1月份的历史高点下跌了近23%。</blockquote></p><p> So, what’s prompting investors to shun this market tech darling, even when its financials have shown a great turnaround?</p><p><blockquote>那么，是什么促使投资者回避这个市场科技宠儿，即使它的财务状况已经显示出巨大的好转呢？</blockquote></p><p> As we see it, there are both short- and long-term factors at play, causing Tesla enthusiasts to move to the sidelines. Here are three key catalysts that make this EV stalwart a risky bet right now, supporting our view that Tesla is not a buy in this environment:</p><p><blockquote>正如我们所看到的，有短期和长期因素在起作用，导致特斯拉爱好者转向观望。以下三个关键催化剂使这家电动汽车巨头目前成为一个冒险的赌注，支持我们的观点，即特斯拉在这种环境下不值得买入：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Chip Shortages</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一、芯片短缺</b></blockquote></p><p> The global chip shortages that have hurt production for many car-makers is beginning to pinch Tesla as well. During its earnings call, Tesla told investors that the company's future pace of growth won't be able to escape the ongoing supply-chain challenges.</p><p><blockquote>全球芯片短缺损害了许多汽车制造商的生产，也开始挤压特斯拉。在财报看涨期权上，特斯拉告诉投资者，公司未来的增长速度将无法逃脱持续的供应链挑战。</blockquote></p><p> The company, for example, is struggling to introduce new models and secure parts for all its vehicles. Tesla again delayed its semi-trailer truck—already two years late—with first deliveries now slated for 2022. The company attributed the delay to supply-chain issues and limited battery-cell supply, as well as trying to focus on getting new factories online.</p><p><blockquote>例如，该公司正在努力推出新车型并确保所有车辆的零部件。特斯拉再次推迟了其半挂卡车的发布——已经晚了两年——首批交付预计于2022年进行。该公司将延迟归因于供应链问题和电池供应有限，以及试图专注于让新工厂上线。</blockquote></p><p> The company’s plans for its first pickup truck, once expected to go to customers as early as this year, are also being affected by parts issues, said Chief Executive Elon Musk on an earnings call, without giving a revised first delivery date.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席执行官Elon Musk在财报看涨期权上表示，该公司首款皮卡的计划曾预计最早将于今年交付给客户，但也受到零部件问题的影响，但没有给出修改后的首次交付日期。</blockquote></p><p> How long chip-supply issues will persist is anybody’s guess right now. Chip-makers are trying to eke out more supply through changes to manufacturing processes and by opening up spare capacity to rivals, auditing customer orders to prevent hoarding and swapping over production lines, according to a recent report by theWall Street Journal. The bad news: there are no quick fixes, as building new production capacity usually takes years.</p><p><blockquote>现在谁也说不准芯片供应问题会持续多久。据《华尔街日报》最近的一篇报道，芯片制造商正试图通过改变制造工艺、向竞争对手开放闲置产能、审核客户订单以防止囤积和更换生产线来维持更多供应。坏消息是：没有快速解决方案，因为建设新产能通常需要数年时间。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Competition Heating Up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.竞争升温</b></blockquote></p><p> Another threat challenging Tesla’s dominance in the EV market is coming from new sources of competition. Overall, five of the biggest automakers—Daimler(OTC:DDAIF), Ford (NYSE:F),General Motors(NYSE:GM), Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) and Volkswagen (OTC:VWAGY)—have each laid out plans to spend an average $6.5 billion annually on electrification efforts over the next five to 10 years, according toBloomberg.</p><p><blockquote>挑战特斯拉在电动汽车市场主导地位的另一个威胁来自新的竞争来源。总体而言，五家最大的汽车制造商——戴姆勒(OTC：DDAIF)、福特(NYSE：F)、通用汽车(NYSE：GM)、Stellantis(NYSE：STLA)和大众汽车(OTC：VWAGY)——都制定了计划据彭博社报道，未来5到10年，平均每年在电气化方面花费65亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> In April, VW launched its new Audi Q4 e-tron model to compete with Tesla in the fast-growing market of compact crossover SUVs. The Audi’s EV model is among a dozen vehicles the German auto-maker has planned, including VW’s ID.4 and an electric version of the Porsche Macan. VW is aiming to sell roughly 600,000 purely battery-powered cars this year.</p><p><blockquote>4月，大众推出了新款奥迪Q4 e-tron车型，在快速增长的紧凑型跨界SUV市场与特斯拉竞争。奥迪的电动车型是这家德国汽车制造商计划推出的十几款汽车之一，其中包括大众的ID.4和保时捷Macan的电动版。大众汽车的目标是今年销售约60万辆纯电池驱动的汽车。</blockquote></p><p> While traditional auto-makers, like Volkswagen and GM accelerate their EV efforts, smaller Chinese upstarts like Nio (NYSE:NIO) and Xpeng (NYSE:XPEV) are also vying for tech-savvy customers.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大众汽车和通用汽车等传统汽车制造商正在加速电动汽车的发展，但蔚来（纽约证券交易所股票代码：蔚来）和小鹏汽车（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XPEV）等规模较小的中国新贵也在争夺精通技术的客户。</blockquote></p><p> According to media reports, GM’s EV plans will accelerate starting later this year as a Hummer pickup truck and Cadillac Lyriq sport utility vehicle begin rolling off the Detroit carmaker's production lines. An electric Chevy Silverado pickup is also on the way.</p><p><blockquote>据媒体报道，随着悍马皮卡和凯迪拉克Lyriq运动型多功能车开始从底特律汽车制造商的生产线下线，通用汽车的电动汽车计划将从今年晚些时候开始加速。一款电动雪佛兰索罗德皮卡也即将上市。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> In China, GM’s lower-priced Hongguang Mini EV, which it’s producing with two state-owned companies, has been a hit. More than a quarter of a million of the models have been sold since the vehicle launched last July, outperforming international rivals like Tesla’s Model 3 and local competitors, including Great Wall's (OTC:GWLLY) Ora Black Cat.</p><p><blockquote>在中国，通用汽车与两家国有企业合作生产的价格较低的宏光迷你电动汽车大受欢迎。自去年7月推出以来，该车型已售出超过25万辆，表现优于特斯拉Model 3等国际竞争对手和长城（场外交易代码：GWLLY）奥拉黑猫等本地竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Lofty Valuations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.高估值</b></blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s valuation has also been a major source of friction among Wall Street’s top analysts. Those who see Tesla as a highly overpriced stock argue that the company has no room to make an error when its stock is priced for perfection.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的估值也一直是华尔街顶级分析师之间摩擦的主要来源。那些认为特斯拉股票定价过高的人认为，当其股票定价完美时，该公司没有犯错的余地。</blockquote></p><p> JPMorgan, which has an underweight rating on Tesla with a price target of $160, said in a recent note:</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通对特斯拉给予跑输大盘评级，目标价为160美元，该公司在最近的一份报告中表示：</blockquote></p><p>   “Tesla’s high valuation leaves little room for less-than-perfect execution, as evidenced by a relatively tepid reaction in the aftermarket Monday to what was a fairly sizable EBITA beat, and we did see some less than perfect takeaways, including the official delay of the Tesla Semi into 2022 (albeit likely already almost entirely baked in); the seeming delay of the Cybertruck from late 2021 into 2022 (likely mostly baked in).”  Even after its recent selloff, Tesla has a $680-billion market capitalization, making it worth more than the combined value of GM, Ford, Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Volkswagen.</p><p><blockquote>“特斯拉的高估值几乎没有给不完美的执行留下空间，周一售后市场对相当大的EBITA超出预期的反应相对不温不火就证明了这一点，我们确实看到了一些不太完美的收获，包括官方推迟特斯拉Semi到2022年（尽管可能已经几乎完全成熟）；Cybertruck似乎从2021年底推迟到2022年（可能大部分时间都是内置的）。”即使在最近的抛售之后，特斯拉的市值仍为6800亿美元，超过了通用汽车、福特、丰田汽车(NYSE：TM)和大众汽车的总价值。</blockquote></p><p> Bernstein Research, which has a sell rating on Tesla with a price target of $175, said in its note:</p><p><blockquote>Bernstein Research对特斯拉给予卖出评级，目标价为175美元，该公司在报告中表示：</blockquote></p><p>   “We continue to struggle to justify TSLA’s valuation, which is higher than all other major automakers combined and appears to imply huge volume and industry leading profitability going forward, which is historically unprecedented.”  These bearish views, however, shouldn’t hide the fact that many analysts believe Tesla is more than a car company and its stock has more upside.</p><p><blockquote>“我们继续努力证明特斯拉的估值是合理的，该估值高于所有其他主要汽车制造商的总和，似乎意味着未来巨大的销量和行业领先的盈利能力，这是历史上前所未有的。”然而，这些看跌观点不应掩盖这样一个事实：许多分析师认为特斯拉不仅仅是一家汽车公司，其股票还有更大的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas says Tesla shouldn’t be valued as a legacy car-maker. As cars become more connected to the internet, that opens up a lot of other addressable markets and Tesla is well-positioned to take advantage of those new opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>Morgan Stanley的Adam Jonas表示，特斯拉不应被视为一家传统汽车制造商。随着汽车与互联网的连接越来越紧密，这开辟了许多其他潜在市场，特斯拉处于有利地位，可以利用这些新机遇。</blockquote></p><p> Said Jonas in a Bloomberg report:</p><p><blockquote>乔纳斯在彭博社的一篇报道中说：</blockquote></p><p>   “In the process, it takes you away from comparing Tesla to car companies and should rather be compared to software-as-a-service companies.”  This divergence is evident from<i>Investing.com</i>poll of analystsregarding Tesla’s share price. Of 35 analysts, 15 have a buy rating on the stock, while 12 have neutral ratings and eight have a sell recommendation, with a 12-month consensus price target of $730.59.</p><p><blockquote>“在这个过程中，它让你不再将特斯拉与汽车公司进行比较，而应该将其与软件即服务公司进行比较。”这种差异从<i>Investing.com</i>分析师对特斯拉股价的民意调查。在35名分析师中，15名分析师对该股给予买入评级，12名分析师给予中性评级，8名分析师给予卖出建议，12个月一致目标价为730.59美元。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e03552d09d605eee4bcfefd531f11080\" tg-width=\"1332\" tg-height=\"856\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Chart: Investing.com</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图表：Investing.com</span></p></blockquote></p><p> For investors, who look to technical signals to help make short-term investment decisions, the most popular indicators—moving averages, oscillators and pivots—are currently providing a buy signal, especially after Tesla’s strong earnings beat.</p><p><blockquote>对于寻求技术信号来帮助做出短期投资决策的投资者来说，最受欢迎的指标——移动平均线、振荡指标和支点——目前正在提供买入信号，尤其是在特斯拉强劲盈利超出预期之后。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Bottom Line</b></p><p><blockquote><b>底线</b></blockquote></p><p> Tesla has remained the only credible player in the high-quality EV market in recent years, but that equation is changing quickly after the entry of new players and the massive spending plans being put forward by the legacy car-makers. These dynamics don’t justify the company’s current valuation, which assumes that Tesla will become the biggest seller of cars in the U.S., while competitors won’t be able to succeed.</p><p><blockquote>近年来，特斯拉仍然是高质量电动汽车市场上唯一可靠的参与者，但在新参与者的进入以及传统汽车制造商提出的大规模支出计划之后，这种情况正在迅速发生变化。这些动态并不能证明该公司目前的估值是合理的，该估值假设特斯拉将成为美国最大的汽车销售商，而竞争对手将无法成功。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Reasons Tesla Stock Is Currently Overvalued<blockquote>特斯拉股票目前被高估的3个原因</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Reasons Tesla Stock Is Currently Overvalued<blockquote>特斯拉股票目前被高估的3个原因</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Investing.com</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 14:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>摘要：</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>After a remarkable rally last year, Tesla stock has lost its momentum.</li>  <li>The stock’s tepid reaction to impressive Q2 earnings shows that the bull case is weakening.</li>  <li>Chip shortages, rising competition could keep Tesla under pressure this year.</li> </ul> Lately, Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) shares seem to have lost their magic. The stock no longer reacts wildly to every positive development, disappointing investors who made fortunes while staying faithful to the world’s largest electric car-maker.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>经过去年的显着上涨后，特斯拉股价已经失去了动力。</li><li>该股对令人印象深刻的第二季度盈利反应不温不火，表明牛市正在减弱。</li><li>芯片短缺、竞争加剧可能会让特斯拉今年面临压力。</li></ul>最近，特斯拉（纳斯达克：TSLA）的股票似乎失去了魔力。该股不再对每一个积极的发展做出疯狂的反应，这让那些在忠于这家全球最大电动汽车制造商的同时发财的投资者感到失望。</blockquote></p><p> The latest example of this dampening optimism came when Tesla announced itsquarterly earningson July 26. The company’s shares fell more than 4% after the earnings report, which handedly beat analysts’ consensus estimates.</p><p><blockquote>这种令人沮丧的乐观情绪的最新例子是特斯拉7月26日公布的季度收益。财报发布后，该公司股价下跌超过4%，大幅超出分析师的普遍预期。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae1d0e8a03c4269ff0c91bcaaf57e87d\" tg-width=\"1412\" tg-height=\"1172\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Tesla Weekly Chart.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>特斯拉周线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> During the quarter, in which the California-based car-maker produced a record 201,250 vehicles, its profit more than tripled to $1.45 a share on an adjusted basis, beating the $0.97 average analysts had estimated. It was also the company’s eighth straight profitable quarter.</p><p><blockquote>本季度，这家总部位于加州的汽车制造商生产了创纪录的201,250辆汽车，调整后的利润增长了两倍多，达到每股1.45美元，超过了分析师平均预期的0.97美元。这也是该公司连续第八个季度盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla's net income in the second quarter was roughly equal to the prior four quarters combined. The company reported revenue of roughly $12 billion for the period that ended June 30, nearly double the amount in the corresponding period a year earlier.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉第二季度的净利润大致相当于前四个季度的总和。该公司报告截至6月30日的期间收入约为120亿美元，几乎是去年同期的两倍。</blockquote></p><p> Despite this strong earnings momentum, the stock didn’t jump the way it once did on every shred of positive news. TSLA is up less than 6% during the past five days as of yesterday's close. From its record high in January, Tesla shares are down almost 23%.</p><p><blockquote>尽管盈利势头强劲，但该股并没有像以前那样因每一个利好消息而上涨。截至昨天收盘，特斯拉在过去五天内上涨了不到6%。特斯拉股价较1月份的历史高点下跌了近23%。</blockquote></p><p> So, what’s prompting investors to shun this market tech darling, even when its financials have shown a great turnaround?</p><p><blockquote>那么，是什么促使投资者回避这个市场科技宠儿，即使它的财务状况已经显示出巨大的好转呢？</blockquote></p><p> As we see it, there are both short- and long-term factors at play, causing Tesla enthusiasts to move to the sidelines. Here are three key catalysts that make this EV stalwart a risky bet right now, supporting our view that Tesla is not a buy in this environment:</p><p><blockquote>正如我们所看到的，有短期和长期因素在起作用，导致特斯拉爱好者转向观望。以下三个关键催化剂使这家电动汽车巨头目前成为一个冒险的赌注，支持我们的观点，即特斯拉在这种环境下不值得买入：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Chip Shortages</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一、芯片短缺</b></blockquote></p><p> The global chip shortages that have hurt production for many car-makers is beginning to pinch Tesla as well. During its earnings call, Tesla told investors that the company's future pace of growth won't be able to escape the ongoing supply-chain challenges.</p><p><blockquote>全球芯片短缺损害了许多汽车制造商的生产，也开始挤压特斯拉。在财报看涨期权上，特斯拉告诉投资者，公司未来的增长速度将无法逃脱持续的供应链挑战。</blockquote></p><p> The company, for example, is struggling to introduce new models and secure parts for all its vehicles. Tesla again delayed its semi-trailer truck—already two years late—with first deliveries now slated for 2022. The company attributed the delay to supply-chain issues and limited battery-cell supply, as well as trying to focus on getting new factories online.</p><p><blockquote>例如，该公司正在努力推出新车型并确保所有车辆的零部件。特斯拉再次推迟了其半挂卡车的发布——已经晚了两年——首批交付预计于2022年进行。该公司将延迟归因于供应链问题和电池供应有限，以及试图专注于让新工厂上线。</blockquote></p><p> The company’s plans for its first pickup truck, once expected to go to customers as early as this year, are also being affected by parts issues, said Chief Executive Elon Musk on an earnings call, without giving a revised first delivery date.</p><p><blockquote>该公司首席执行官Elon Musk在财报看涨期权上表示，该公司首款皮卡的计划曾预计最早将于今年交付给客户，但也受到零部件问题的影响，但没有给出修改后的首次交付日期。</blockquote></p><p> How long chip-supply issues will persist is anybody’s guess right now. Chip-makers are trying to eke out more supply through changes to manufacturing processes and by opening up spare capacity to rivals, auditing customer orders to prevent hoarding and swapping over production lines, according to a recent report by theWall Street Journal. The bad news: there are no quick fixes, as building new production capacity usually takes years.</p><p><blockquote>现在谁也说不准芯片供应问题会持续多久。据《华尔街日报》最近的一篇报道，芯片制造商正试图通过改变制造工艺、向竞争对手开放闲置产能、审核客户订单以防止囤积和更换生产线来维持更多供应。坏消息是：没有快速解决方案，因为建设新产能通常需要数年时间。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Competition Heating Up</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.竞争升温</b></blockquote></p><p> Another threat challenging Tesla’s dominance in the EV market is coming from new sources of competition. Overall, five of the biggest automakers—Daimler(OTC:DDAIF), Ford (NYSE:F),General Motors(NYSE:GM), Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) and Volkswagen (OTC:VWAGY)—have each laid out plans to spend an average $6.5 billion annually on electrification efforts over the next five to 10 years, according toBloomberg.</p><p><blockquote>挑战特斯拉在电动汽车市场主导地位的另一个威胁来自新的竞争来源。总体而言，五家最大的汽车制造商——戴姆勒(OTC：DDAIF)、福特(NYSE：F)、通用汽车(NYSE：GM)、Stellantis(NYSE：STLA)和大众汽车(OTC：VWAGY)——都制定了计划据彭博社报道，未来5到10年，平均每年在电气化方面花费65亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> In April, VW launched its new Audi Q4 e-tron model to compete with Tesla in the fast-growing market of compact crossover SUVs. The Audi’s EV model is among a dozen vehicles the German auto-maker has planned, including VW’s ID.4 and an electric version of the Porsche Macan. VW is aiming to sell roughly 600,000 purely battery-powered cars this year.</p><p><blockquote>4月，大众推出了新款奥迪Q4 e-tron车型，在快速增长的紧凑型跨界SUV市场与特斯拉竞争。奥迪的电动车型是这家德国汽车制造商计划推出的十几款汽车之一，其中包括大众的ID.4和保时捷Macan的电动版。大众汽车的目标是今年销售约60万辆纯电池驱动的汽车。</blockquote></p><p> While traditional auto-makers, like Volkswagen and GM accelerate their EV efforts, smaller Chinese upstarts like Nio (NYSE:NIO) and Xpeng (NYSE:XPEV) are also vying for tech-savvy customers.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大众汽车和通用汽车等传统汽车制造商正在加速电动汽车的发展，但蔚来（纽约证券交易所股票代码：蔚来）和小鹏汽车（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XPEV）等规模较小的中国新贵也在争夺精通技术的客户。</blockquote></p><p> According to media reports, GM’s EV plans will accelerate starting later this year as a Hummer pickup truck and Cadillac Lyriq sport utility vehicle begin rolling off the Detroit carmaker's production lines. An electric Chevy Silverado pickup is also on the way.</p><p><blockquote>据媒体报道，随着悍马皮卡和凯迪拉克Lyriq运动型多功能车开始从底特律汽车制造商的生产线下线，通用汽车的电动汽车计划将从今年晚些时候开始加速。一款电动雪佛兰索罗德皮卡也即将上市。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> In China, GM’s lower-priced Hongguang Mini EV, which it’s producing with two state-owned companies, has been a hit. More than a quarter of a million of the models have been sold since the vehicle launched last July, outperforming international rivals like Tesla’s Model 3 and local competitors, including Great Wall's (OTC:GWLLY) Ora Black Cat.</p><p><blockquote>在中国，通用汽车与两家国有企业合作生产的价格较低的宏光迷你电动汽车大受欢迎。自去年7月推出以来，该车型已售出超过25万辆，表现优于特斯拉Model 3等国际竞争对手和长城（场外交易代码：GWLLY）奥拉黑猫等本地竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Lofty Valuations</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.高估值</b></blockquote></p><p> Tesla’s valuation has also been a major source of friction among Wall Street’s top analysts. Those who see Tesla as a highly overpriced stock argue that the company has no room to make an error when its stock is priced for perfection.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的估值也一直是华尔街顶级分析师之间摩擦的主要来源。那些认为特斯拉股票定价过高的人认为，当其股票定价完美时，该公司没有犯错的余地。</blockquote></p><p> JPMorgan, which has an underweight rating on Tesla with a price target of $160, said in a recent note:</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通对特斯拉给予跑输大盘评级，目标价为160美元，该公司在最近的一份报告中表示：</blockquote></p><p>   “Tesla’s high valuation leaves little room for less-than-perfect execution, as evidenced by a relatively tepid reaction in the aftermarket Monday to what was a fairly sizable EBITA beat, and we did see some less than perfect takeaways, including the official delay of the Tesla Semi into 2022 (albeit likely already almost entirely baked in); the seeming delay of the Cybertruck from late 2021 into 2022 (likely mostly baked in).”  Even after its recent selloff, Tesla has a $680-billion market capitalization, making it worth more than the combined value of GM, Ford, Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Volkswagen.</p><p><blockquote>“特斯拉的高估值几乎没有给不完美的执行留下空间，周一售后市场对相当大的EBITA超出预期的反应相对不温不火就证明了这一点，我们确实看到了一些不太完美的收获，包括官方推迟特斯拉Semi到2022年（尽管可能已经几乎完全成熟）；Cybertruck似乎从2021年底推迟到2022年（可能大部分时间都是内置的）。”即使在最近的抛售之后，特斯拉的市值仍为6800亿美元，超过了通用汽车、福特、丰田汽车(NYSE：TM)和大众汽车的总价值。</blockquote></p><p> Bernstein Research, which has a sell rating on Tesla with a price target of $175, said in its note:</p><p><blockquote>Bernstein Research对特斯拉给予卖出评级，目标价为175美元，该公司在报告中表示：</blockquote></p><p>   “We continue to struggle to justify TSLA’s valuation, which is higher than all other major automakers combined and appears to imply huge volume and industry leading profitability going forward, which is historically unprecedented.”  These bearish views, however, shouldn’t hide the fact that many analysts believe Tesla is more than a car company and its stock has more upside.</p><p><blockquote>“我们继续努力证明特斯拉的估值是合理的，该估值高于所有其他主要汽车制造商的总和，似乎意味着未来巨大的销量和行业领先的盈利能力，这是历史上前所未有的。”然而，这些看跌观点不应掩盖这样一个事实：许多分析师认为特斯拉不仅仅是一家汽车公司，其股票还有更大的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas says Tesla shouldn’t be valued as a legacy car-maker. As cars become more connected to the internet, that opens up a lot of other addressable markets and Tesla is well-positioned to take advantage of those new opportunities.</p><p><blockquote>Morgan Stanley的Adam Jonas表示，特斯拉不应被视为一家传统汽车制造商。随着汽车与互联网的连接越来越紧密，这开辟了许多其他潜在市场，特斯拉处于有利地位，可以利用这些新机遇。</blockquote></p><p> Said Jonas in a Bloomberg report:</p><p><blockquote>乔纳斯在彭博社的一篇报道中说：</blockquote></p><p>   “In the process, it takes you away from comparing Tesla to car companies and should rather be compared to software-as-a-service companies.”  This divergence is evident from<i>Investing.com</i>poll of analystsregarding Tesla’s share price. Of 35 analysts, 15 have a buy rating on the stock, while 12 have neutral ratings and eight have a sell recommendation, with a 12-month consensus price target of $730.59.</p><p><blockquote>“在这个过程中，它让你不再将特斯拉与汽车公司进行比较，而应该将其与软件即服务公司进行比较。”这种差异从<i>Investing.com</i>分析师对特斯拉股价的民意调查。在35名分析师中，15名分析师对该股给予买入评级，12名分析师给予中性评级，8名分析师给予卖出建议，12个月一致目标价为730.59美元。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e03552d09d605eee4bcfefd531f11080\" tg-width=\"1332\" tg-height=\"856\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Chart: Investing.com</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图表：Investing.com</span></p></blockquote></p><p> For investors, who look to technical signals to help make short-term investment decisions, the most popular indicators—moving averages, oscillators and pivots—are currently providing a buy signal, especially after Tesla’s strong earnings beat.</p><p><blockquote>对于寻求技术信号来帮助做出短期投资决策的投资者来说，最受欢迎的指标——移动平均线、振荡指标和支点——目前正在提供买入信号，尤其是在特斯拉强劲盈利超出预期之后。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Bottom Line</b></p><p><blockquote><b>底线</b></blockquote></p><p> Tesla has remained the only credible player in the high-quality EV market in recent years, but that equation is changing quickly after the entry of new players and the massive spending plans being put forward by the legacy car-makers. These dynamics don’t justify the company’s current valuation, which assumes that Tesla will become the biggest seller of cars in the U.S., while competitors won’t be able to succeed.</p><p><blockquote>近年来，特斯拉仍然是高质量电动汽车市场上唯一可靠的参与者，但在新参与者的进入以及传统汽车制造商提出的大规模支出计划之后，这种情况正在迅速发生变化。这些动态并不能证明该公司目前的估值是合理的，该估值假设特斯拉将成为美国最大的汽车销售商，而竞争对手将无法成功。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.investing.com/analysis/3-reasons-tesla-stock-is-currently-overvalued-200595598\">Investing.com</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.investing.com/analysis/3-reasons-tesla-stock-is-currently-overvalued-200595598","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195860961","content_text":"Summary:\n\nAfter a remarkable rally last year, Tesla stock has lost its momentum.\nThe stock’s tepid reaction to impressive Q2 earnings shows that the bull case is weakening.\nChip shortages, rising competition could keep Tesla under pressure this year.\n\nLately, Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) shares seem to have lost their magic. The stock no longer reacts wildly to every positive development, disappointing investors who made fortunes while staying faithful to the world’s largest electric car-maker.\nThe latest example of this dampening optimism came when Tesla announced itsquarterly earningson July 26. The company’s shares fell more than 4% after the earnings report, which handedly beat analysts’ consensus estimates.\nTesla Weekly Chart.\nDuring the quarter, in which the California-based car-maker produced a record 201,250 vehicles, its profit more than tripled to $1.45 a share on an adjusted basis, beating the $0.97 average analysts had estimated. It was also the company’s eighth straight profitable quarter.\nTesla's net income in the second quarter was roughly equal to the prior four quarters combined. The company reported revenue of roughly $12 billion for the period that ended June 30, nearly double the amount in the corresponding period a year earlier.\nDespite this strong earnings momentum, the stock didn’t jump the way it once did on every shred of positive news. TSLA is up less than 6% during the past five days as of yesterday's close. From its record high in January, Tesla shares are down almost 23%.\nSo, what’s prompting investors to shun this market tech darling, even when its financials have shown a great turnaround?\nAs we see it, there are both short- and long-term factors at play, causing Tesla enthusiasts to move to the sidelines. Here are three key catalysts that make this EV stalwart a risky bet right now, supporting our view that Tesla is not a buy in this environment:\n1. Chip Shortages\nThe global chip shortages that have hurt production for many car-makers is beginning to pinch Tesla as well. During its earnings call, Tesla told investors that the company's future pace of growth won't be able to escape the ongoing supply-chain challenges.\nThe company, for example, is struggling to introduce new models and secure parts for all its vehicles. Tesla again delayed its semi-trailer truck—already two years late—with first deliveries now slated for 2022. The company attributed the delay to supply-chain issues and limited battery-cell supply, as well as trying to focus on getting new factories online.\nThe company’s plans for its first pickup truck, once expected to go to customers as early as this year, are also being affected by parts issues, said Chief Executive Elon Musk on an earnings call, without giving a revised first delivery date.\nHow long chip-supply issues will persist is anybody’s guess right now. Chip-makers are trying to eke out more supply through changes to manufacturing processes and by opening up spare capacity to rivals, auditing customer orders to prevent hoarding and swapping over production lines, according to a recent report by theWall Street Journal. The bad news: there are no quick fixes, as building new production capacity usually takes years.\n2. Competition Heating Up\nAnother threat challenging Tesla’s dominance in the EV market is coming from new sources of competition. Overall, five of the biggest automakers—Daimler(OTC:DDAIF), Ford (NYSE:F),General Motors(NYSE:GM), Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) and Volkswagen (OTC:VWAGY)—have each laid out plans to spend an average $6.5 billion annually on electrification efforts over the next five to 10 years, according toBloomberg.\nIn April, VW launched its new Audi Q4 e-tron model to compete with Tesla in the fast-growing market of compact crossover SUVs. The Audi’s EV model is among a dozen vehicles the German auto-maker has planned, including VW’s ID.4 and an electric version of the Porsche Macan. VW is aiming to sell roughly 600,000 purely battery-powered cars this year.\nWhile traditional auto-makers, like Volkswagen and GM accelerate their EV efforts, smaller Chinese upstarts like Nio (NYSE:NIO) and Xpeng (NYSE:XPEV) are also vying for tech-savvy customers.\nAccording to media reports, GM’s EV plans will accelerate starting later this year as a Hummer pickup truck and Cadillac Lyriq sport utility vehicle begin rolling off the Detroit carmaker's production lines. An electric Chevy Silverado pickup is also on the way.\nIn China, GM’s lower-priced Hongguang Mini EV, which it’s producing with two state-owned companies, has been a hit. More than a quarter of a million of the models have been sold since the vehicle launched last July, outperforming international rivals like Tesla’s Model 3 and local competitors, including Great Wall's (OTC:GWLLY) Ora Black Cat.\n3. Lofty Valuations\nTesla’s valuation has also been a major source of friction among Wall Street’s top analysts. Those who see Tesla as a highly overpriced stock argue that the company has no room to make an error when its stock is priced for perfection.\nJPMorgan, which has an underweight rating on Tesla with a price target of $160, said in a recent note:\n\n “Tesla’s high valuation leaves little room for less-than-perfect execution, as evidenced by a relatively tepid reaction in the aftermarket Monday to what was a fairly sizable EBITA beat, and we did see some less than perfect takeaways, including the official delay of the Tesla Semi into 2022 (albeit likely already almost entirely baked in); the seeming delay of the Cybertruck from late 2021 into 2022 (likely mostly baked in).”\n\nEven after its recent selloff, Tesla has a $680-billion market capitalization, making it worth more than the combined value of GM, Ford, Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Volkswagen.\nBernstein Research, which has a sell rating on Tesla with a price target of $175, said in its note:\n\n “We continue to struggle to justify TSLA’s valuation, which is higher than all other major automakers combined and appears to imply huge volume and industry leading profitability going forward, which is historically unprecedented.”\n\nThese bearish views, however, shouldn’t hide the fact that many analysts believe Tesla is more than a car company and its stock has more upside.\nMorgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas says Tesla shouldn’t be valued as a legacy car-maker. As cars become more connected to the internet, that opens up a lot of other addressable markets and Tesla is well-positioned to take advantage of those new opportunities.\nSaid Jonas in a Bloomberg report:\n\n “In the process, it takes you away from comparing Tesla to car companies and should rather be compared to software-as-a-service companies.”\n\nThis divergence is evident fromInvesting.compoll of analystsregarding Tesla’s share price. Of 35 analysts, 15 have a buy rating on the stock, while 12 have neutral ratings and eight have a sell recommendation, with a 12-month consensus price target of $730.59.\nChart: Investing.com\nFor investors, who look to technical signals to help make short-term investment decisions, the most popular indicators—moving averages, oscillators and pivots—are currently providing a buy signal, especially after Tesla’s strong earnings beat.\nBottom Line\nTesla has remained the only credible player in the high-quality EV market in recent years, but that equation is changing quickly after the entry of new players and the massive spending plans being put forward by the legacy car-makers. These dynamics don’t justify the company’s current valuation, which assumes that Tesla will become the biggest seller of cars in the U.S., while competitors won’t be able to succeed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1766,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804559319,"gmtCreate":1627966595231,"gmtModify":1631883895393,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"They are running out of cash to burn. Scaling is the most challenging part and this is one of the quickest way.&nbsp;","listText":"They are running out of cash to burn. Scaling is the most challenging part and this is one of the quickest way.&nbsp;","text":"They are running out of cash to burn. Scaling is the most challenging part and this is one of the quickest way.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804559319","repostId":"2156117308","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1763,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":805205413,"gmtCreate":1627880829632,"gmtModify":1633755636339,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Add on to my previous comment. The number 1 challenge now is batteries supply.&nbsp;","listText":"Add on to my previous comment. The number 1 challenge now is batteries supply.&nbsp;","text":"Add on to my previous comment. The number 1 challenge now is batteries supply.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/805205413","repostId":"2156161209","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2031,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":805205350,"gmtCreate":1627880753270,"gmtModify":1631883895497,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"What about Elon as one of challenges? How long more will Elon be around to drive TESLA to innovate? What if something happen to him? Tesla is Elon. Elon is Tesla. Thoughts?","listText":"What about Elon as one of challenges? How long more will Elon be around to drive TESLA to innovate? What if something happen to him? Tesla is Elon. Elon is Tesla. Thoughts?","text":"What about Elon as one of challenges? How long more will Elon be around to drive TESLA to innovate? What if something happen to him? Tesla is Elon. Elon is Tesla. Thoughts?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/805205350","repostId":"2156161209","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801715170,"gmtCreate":1627534570090,"gmtModify":1631884235983,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Battle of raw materials. I even think the reason why China push for EV is considering how the batteries raw materials are heavily sourced from China.&nbsp;","listText":"Battle of raw materials. I even think the reason why China push for EV is considering how the batteries raw materials are heavily sourced from China.&nbsp;","text":"Battle of raw materials. I even think the reason why China push for EV is considering how the batteries raw materials are heavily sourced from China.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801715170","repostId":"1191251432","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1191251432","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627524003,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1191251432?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-29 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What Tesla’s bet on iron-based batteries means for manufacturers<blockquote>特斯拉押注铁基电池对制造商意味着什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191251432","media":"finance.yahoo","summary":"Elon Musk earlier this week made his most bullish statements yet on iron-based batteries, noting tha","content":"<p>Elon Musk earlier this week made his most bullish statements yet on iron-based batteries, noting that Tesla is making a “long-term shift” toward older, cheaper lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cells in its energy storage products and some entry-level EVs.</p><p><blockquote>Elon Musk本周早些时候对铁基电池发表了迄今为止最乐观的声明，并指出特斯拉正在其储能产品和一些产品中“长期转向”更旧、更便宜的磷酸铁锂(LFP)电池。入门级电动汽车。</blockquote></p><p> The Tesla CEO mused that the company's batteries may eventually be roughly two-thirds iron-based and one-third nickel-based across its products. “And this is actually good because there’s plenty of iron in the world,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>这位特斯拉首席执行官沉思道，该公司的电池最终可能会在其产品中大约三分之二是铁基电池，三分之一是镍基电池。“这实际上很好，因为世界上有大量的铁，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Musk's comments reflect a change that is already underway within the automotive sector, mainly in China. Battery chemistries outside of China have been predominantly nickel-based -- specifically nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) and nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA). These newer chemistries have become attractive to automakers due to their higher energy density, letting original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) improve the range of their batteries.</p><p><blockquote>马斯克的言论反映了汽车行业（主要是在中国）已经发生的变化。中国以外的电池化学物质主要是镍基电池，特别是镍锰钴(NMC)和镍钴铝(NCA)。这些较新的化学物质由于其更高的能量密度而对汽车制造商具有吸引力，使原始设备制造商(OEM)能够提高电池的续航里程。</blockquote></p><p> If Musk's bullishness is heralding a genuine shift across the EV industry, the question is whether battery makers outside of China will be able to keep up.</p><p><blockquote>如果马斯克的乐观预示着整个电动汽车行业的真正转变，那么问题是中国以外的电池制造商是否能够跟上。</blockquote></p><p> Musk is not the only automotive executive to signal a return to the LFP formula. Earlier this year, Ford CEO Jim Farley said the company would use LFP batteries in some commercial vehicles. Meanwhile, Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess announced during the company’s inaugural battery day presentation that LFP would be used in some VW entry-level EVs.</p><p><blockquote>马斯克并不是唯一一位表示回归LFP模式的汽车高管。今年早些时候，福特首席执行官Jim Farley表示，该公司将在一些商用车中使用LFP电池。与此同时，大众汽车首席执行官赫伯特·迪斯(Elon Musk)在公司首届电池日演讲中宣布，磷酸铁锂将用于大众的一些入门级电动汽车。</blockquote></p><p> On the energy storage front, Musk's comments about using LFP-based chemistries in Powerwall and Megapack are in line with other stationary energy storage companies pushing for iron-based formulas. “The stationary storage industry wants to move to LFP because it's cheaper,” Sam Jaffe, who heads the battery research firm Cairn Energy Research Advisors, told TechCrunch.</p><p><blockquote>在储能方面，马斯克关于在Powerwall和Megapack中使用基于LFP的化学物质的评论与其他固定式储能公司推动铁基配方的做法一致。电池研究公司Cairn Energy Research Advisors的负责人Sam Jaffe告诉TechCrunch：“固定存储行业希望转向磷酸铁锂，因为它更便宜。”</blockquote></p><p> LFP battery cells are attractive for a few different reasons. For one, they’re not dependent on ultra-scarce and price-volatile raw materials like cobalt and nickel. (Cobalt, which is predominantly sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo, has undergone additional scrutiny due to inhumane mining conditions.) And while they are less energy-dense than nickel-based chemistries, LFP batteries are much cheaper. This is good news for those looking to spur the shift to electric vehicles because lowering the cost per vehicle will likely be key to greater EV adoption.</p><p><blockquote>LFP电池具有吸引力有几个不同的原因。首先，它们不依赖钴和镍等极其稀缺且价格波动的原材料。（钴主要来自刚果民主共和国，由于不人道的采矿条件，受到了额外的审查。）虽然LFP电池的能量密度低于镍基化学品，但它们要便宜得多。对于那些希望刺激向电动汽车转变的人来说，这是个好消息，因为降低每辆车的成本可能是电动汽车更多采用的关键。</blockquote></p><p> Musk clearly sees a major future for iron-based chemistries at Tesla, and his comments have helped thrust LFP back into the spotlight. But there's one place where they've remained the star of the show: China.</p><p><blockquote>马斯克清楚地看到了特斯拉铁基化学品的重要未来，他的言论帮助LFP重新成为人们关注的焦点。但有一个地方他们仍然是这场秀的明星：中国。</blockquote></p><p> China’s monopoly on LFP</p><p><blockquote>中国对磷酸铁锂的垄断</blockquote></p><p> “LFP is pretty much only produced in China,” Caspar Rawles, head of price and data assessments at the research firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, explained in a recent interview with TechCrunch.</p><p><blockquote>“磷酸铁锂几乎只在中国生产，”研究公司Benchmark Mineral Intelligence价格和数据评估主管Caspar Rawles在最近接受TechCrunch采访时解释道。</blockquote></p><p> China’s dominance in LFP battery production in part relates to a series of key LFP patents, which are managed by a consortium of universities and research institutions. This consortium came to an agreement with Chinese battery makers a decade ago under which the manufacturers would not be charged a licensing fee providing that the LFP batteries were used only in Chinese markets.</p><p><blockquote>中国在磷酸铁锂电池生产方面的主导地位部分与一系列关键的磷酸铁锂专利有关，这些专利由大学和研究机构组成的财团管理。该财团十年前与中国电池制造商达成协议，如果LFP电池仅在中国市场使用，则不会向制造商收取许可费。</blockquote></p><p> Hence, China cornered the LFP market.</p><p><blockquote>因此，中国垄断了磷酸铁锂市场。</blockquote></p><p> Battery makers in China may benefit most from a potential tectonic shift toward LFP -- specifically BYD and CATL, the latter of which already manufactures LFP batteries for Tesla vehicles built and sold in China. (Volkswagen, meanwhile, has a substantial stake in Chinese LFP maker Gotion High-Tech.) These battery makers aren’t slowing down: In January, CATL and Shenzhen Dynanonic signed an agreement with a local Chinese province to build an LFP cathode plant at a cost of $280 million over three years.</p><p><blockquote>中国的电池制造商可能从向磷酸铁锂的潜在结构性转变中受益最大，特别是比亚迪和宁德时代，后者已经为在中国制造和销售的特斯拉汽车生产磷酸铁锂电池。（与此同时，大众汽车持有中国磷酸铁锂制造商国轩高科的大量股份。）这些电池制造商并没有放慢脚步：一月份，宁德时代和深圳动力与中国当地一个省份签署了一项协议，将在三年内耗资2.8亿美元建造一座磷酸铁锂阴极工厂。</blockquote></p><p> The LFP patents are due to expire in 2022, industry analystRoskill explains, which could give battery manufacturers outside China time to start shifting some of their production toward iron-based formulas. However, all of the planned battery factories in Europe and North America, many of which are joint ventures with South Korean industry giants like LG Chem or SK Innovation, are still focused on nickel-based chemistries.</p><p><blockquote>行业分析师Skill解释说，磷酸铁锂专利将于2022年到期，这可能会让中国以外的电池制造商有时间开始将部分生产转向铁基配方。然而，欧洲和北美所有计划中的电池工厂（其中许多是与LG化学或SK Innovation等韩国行业巨头的合资企业）仍然专注于镍基化学品。</blockquote></p><p> “For the U.S. to take advantage of LFP's strengths, North American manufacturing will be necessary,” Jaffe explained. “Everyone building a gigafactory in the U.S. today is planning on making high nickel chemistries. There's an enormous unmet need for locally manufactured LFP batteries.”</p><p><blockquote>“为了让美国利用磷酸铁锂的优势，北美制造是必要的，”Jaffe解释道。“如今，在美国建造超级工厂的每个人都计划生产高镍化学品。对本地制造的磷酸铁锂电池的需求巨大，尚未得到满足。”</blockquote></p><p> Rawles said he expects some LFP capacity in North America and Europe in the coming years, particularly after the patents expire. He pointed out that both CATL and SVOLT, another battery maker, have been making moves in Germany -- but both of these companies are Chinese, which leaves open the question of whether other Asian or Western companies can compete in the LFP market. (Stellantis chose SVOLT as one of its battery suppliers from 2025 onwards.)</p><p><blockquote>Rawles表示，他预计未来几年北美和欧洲将出现一些LFP产能，特别是在专利到期后。他指出，宁德时代和另一家电池制造商SVOLT都一直在德国采取行动，但这两家公司都是中国公司，这就留下了其他亚洲或西方公司能否在磷酸铁锂市场竞争的问题。（Stellantis选择SVOLT作为2025年起的电池供应商之一。）</blockquote></p><p></p><p> On the energy storage front, Jaffe said he thinks “it's inevitable that most stationary storage systems will eventually be LFP.”</p><p><blockquote>在储能方面，Jaffe表示，他认为“大多数固定式储能系统最终都将是LFP，这是不可避免的。”</blockquote></p><p> However, not all is lost for domestic manufacturing in the United States. “The good news for building local LFP manufacturing is that the supply chain is simple: Outside of lithium, it's iron and phosphoric acid, two cheap materials already made [in the U.S.] in large quantities,” Jaffe added.</p><p><blockquote>然而，美国国内制造业并没有失去一切。“建设本地磷酸铁锂制造的好消息是供应链很简单：除了锂之外，还有铁和磷酸，这两种廉价材料已经在美国大量生产，”Jaffe补充道。</blockquote></p><p> In the end, it is not a question of one battery chemistry versus another. What’s more likely is what we’ve already started to see from automakers, including Tesla: Iron-based batteries will be used predominately in entry-level and cheaper vehicles, while nickel-based cells will be used for higher-end and performance cars. Many consumers will likely be content with a 200- to 250-mile-range vehicle that's thousands of dollars cheaper than one with a range of 300 to 350 miles.</p><p><blockquote>最终，这不是一种电池化学性质与另一种电池化学性质的问题。更有可能的是我们已经开始从包括特斯拉在内的汽车制造商那里看到的情况：铁基电池将主要用于入门级和更便宜的汽车，而镍基电池将用于更高端和高性能的汽车。许多消费者可能会满足于续航里程为200至250英里的车辆，这种车辆比续航里程为300至350英里的车辆便宜数千美元。</blockquote></p><p> Automakers have also begun making moves to take control of the battery supply, whether through vertical manufacturing or joint ventures with established battery companies. That means that growing LFP capacity in North America and Europe is not only likely, but inevitable.</p><p><blockquote>汽车制造商也开始采取措施控制电池供应，无论是通过垂直制造还是与老牌电池公司合资。这意味着北美和欧洲磷酸铁锂产能的增长不仅是可能的，而且是不可避免的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What Tesla’s bet on iron-based batteries means for manufacturers<blockquote>特斯拉押注铁基电池对制造商意味着什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat Tesla’s bet on iron-based batteries means for manufacturers<blockquote>特斯拉押注铁基电池对制造商意味着什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">finance.yahoo</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-29 10:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Elon Musk earlier this week made his most bullish statements yet on iron-based batteries, noting that Tesla is making a “long-term shift” toward older, cheaper lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cells in its energy storage products and some entry-level EVs.</p><p><blockquote>Elon Musk本周早些时候对铁基电池发表了迄今为止最乐观的声明，并指出特斯拉正在其储能产品和一些产品中“长期转向”更旧、更便宜的磷酸铁锂(LFP)电池。入门级电动汽车。</blockquote></p><p> The Tesla CEO mused that the company's batteries may eventually be roughly two-thirds iron-based and one-third nickel-based across its products. “And this is actually good because there’s plenty of iron in the world,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>这位特斯拉首席执行官沉思道，该公司的电池最终可能会在其产品中大约三分之二是铁基电池，三分之一是镍基电池。“这实际上很好，因为世界上有大量的铁，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Musk's comments reflect a change that is already underway within the automotive sector, mainly in China. Battery chemistries outside of China have been predominantly nickel-based -- specifically nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) and nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA). These newer chemistries have become attractive to automakers due to their higher energy density, letting original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) improve the range of their batteries.</p><p><blockquote>马斯克的言论反映了汽车行业（主要是在中国）已经发生的变化。中国以外的电池化学物质主要是镍基电池，特别是镍锰钴(NMC)和镍钴铝(NCA)。这些较新的化学物质由于其更高的能量密度而对汽车制造商具有吸引力，使原始设备制造商(OEM)能够提高电池的续航里程。</blockquote></p><p> If Musk's bullishness is heralding a genuine shift across the EV industry, the question is whether battery makers outside of China will be able to keep up.</p><p><blockquote>如果马斯克的乐观预示着整个电动汽车行业的真正转变，那么问题是中国以外的电池制造商是否能够跟上。</blockquote></p><p> Musk is not the only automotive executive to signal a return to the LFP formula. Earlier this year, Ford CEO Jim Farley said the company would use LFP batteries in some commercial vehicles. Meanwhile, Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess announced during the company’s inaugural battery day presentation that LFP would be used in some VW entry-level EVs.</p><p><blockquote>马斯克并不是唯一一位表示回归LFP模式的汽车高管。今年早些时候，福特首席执行官Jim Farley表示，该公司将在一些商用车中使用LFP电池。与此同时，大众汽车首席执行官赫伯特·迪斯(Elon Musk)在公司首届电池日演讲中宣布，磷酸铁锂将用于大众的一些入门级电动汽车。</blockquote></p><p> On the energy storage front, Musk's comments about using LFP-based chemistries in Powerwall and Megapack are in line with other stationary energy storage companies pushing for iron-based formulas. “The stationary storage industry wants to move to LFP because it's cheaper,” Sam Jaffe, who heads the battery research firm Cairn Energy Research Advisors, told TechCrunch.</p><p><blockquote>在储能方面，马斯克关于在Powerwall和Megapack中使用基于LFP的化学物质的评论与其他固定式储能公司推动铁基配方的做法一致。电池研究公司Cairn Energy Research Advisors的负责人Sam Jaffe告诉TechCrunch：“固定存储行业希望转向磷酸铁锂，因为它更便宜。”</blockquote></p><p> LFP battery cells are attractive for a few different reasons. For one, they’re not dependent on ultra-scarce and price-volatile raw materials like cobalt and nickel. (Cobalt, which is predominantly sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo, has undergone additional scrutiny due to inhumane mining conditions.) And while they are less energy-dense than nickel-based chemistries, LFP batteries are much cheaper. This is good news for those looking to spur the shift to electric vehicles because lowering the cost per vehicle will likely be key to greater EV adoption.</p><p><blockquote>LFP电池具有吸引力有几个不同的原因。首先，它们不依赖钴和镍等极其稀缺且价格波动的原材料。（钴主要来自刚果民主共和国，由于不人道的采矿条件，受到了额外的审查。）虽然LFP电池的能量密度低于镍基化学品，但它们要便宜得多。对于那些希望刺激向电动汽车转变的人来说，这是个好消息，因为降低每辆车的成本可能是电动汽车更多采用的关键。</blockquote></p><p> Musk clearly sees a major future for iron-based chemistries at Tesla, and his comments have helped thrust LFP back into the spotlight. But there's one place where they've remained the star of the show: China.</p><p><blockquote>马斯克清楚地看到了特斯拉铁基化学品的重要未来，他的言论帮助LFP重新成为人们关注的焦点。但有一个地方他们仍然是这场秀的明星：中国。</blockquote></p><p> China’s monopoly on LFP</p><p><blockquote>中国对磷酸铁锂的垄断</blockquote></p><p> “LFP is pretty much only produced in China,” Caspar Rawles, head of price and data assessments at the research firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, explained in a recent interview with TechCrunch.</p><p><blockquote>“磷酸铁锂几乎只在中国生产，”研究公司Benchmark Mineral Intelligence价格和数据评估主管Caspar Rawles在最近接受TechCrunch采访时解释道。</blockquote></p><p> China’s dominance in LFP battery production in part relates to a series of key LFP patents, which are managed by a consortium of universities and research institutions. This consortium came to an agreement with Chinese battery makers a decade ago under which the manufacturers would not be charged a licensing fee providing that the LFP batteries were used only in Chinese markets.</p><p><blockquote>中国在磷酸铁锂电池生产方面的主导地位部分与一系列关键的磷酸铁锂专利有关，这些专利由大学和研究机构组成的财团管理。该财团十年前与中国电池制造商达成协议，如果LFP电池仅在中国市场使用，则不会向制造商收取许可费。</blockquote></p><p> Hence, China cornered the LFP market.</p><p><blockquote>因此，中国垄断了磷酸铁锂市场。</blockquote></p><p> Battery makers in China may benefit most from a potential tectonic shift toward LFP -- specifically BYD and CATL, the latter of which already manufactures LFP batteries for Tesla vehicles built and sold in China. (Volkswagen, meanwhile, has a substantial stake in Chinese LFP maker Gotion High-Tech.) These battery makers aren’t slowing down: In January, CATL and Shenzhen Dynanonic signed an agreement with a local Chinese province to build an LFP cathode plant at a cost of $280 million over three years.</p><p><blockquote>中国的电池制造商可能从向磷酸铁锂的潜在结构性转变中受益最大，特别是比亚迪和宁德时代，后者已经为在中国制造和销售的特斯拉汽车生产磷酸铁锂电池。（与此同时，大众汽车持有中国磷酸铁锂制造商国轩高科的大量股份。）这些电池制造商并没有放慢脚步：一月份，宁德时代和深圳动力与中国当地一个省份签署了一项协议，将在三年内耗资2.8亿美元建造一座磷酸铁锂阴极工厂。</blockquote></p><p> The LFP patents are due to expire in 2022, industry analystRoskill explains, which could give battery manufacturers outside China time to start shifting some of their production toward iron-based formulas. However, all of the planned battery factories in Europe and North America, many of which are joint ventures with South Korean industry giants like LG Chem or SK Innovation, are still focused on nickel-based chemistries.</p><p><blockquote>行业分析师Skill解释说，磷酸铁锂专利将于2022年到期，这可能会让中国以外的电池制造商有时间开始将部分生产转向铁基配方。然而，欧洲和北美所有计划中的电池工厂（其中许多是与LG化学或SK Innovation等韩国行业巨头的合资企业）仍然专注于镍基化学品。</blockquote></p><p> “For the U.S. to take advantage of LFP's strengths, North American manufacturing will be necessary,” Jaffe explained. “Everyone building a gigafactory in the U.S. today is planning on making high nickel chemistries. There's an enormous unmet need for locally manufactured LFP batteries.”</p><p><blockquote>“为了让美国利用磷酸铁锂的优势，北美制造是必要的，”Jaffe解释道。“如今，在美国建造超级工厂的每个人都计划生产高镍化学品。对本地制造的磷酸铁锂电池的需求巨大，尚未得到满足。”</blockquote></p><p> Rawles said he expects some LFP capacity in North America and Europe in the coming years, particularly after the patents expire. He pointed out that both CATL and SVOLT, another battery maker, have been making moves in Germany -- but both of these companies are Chinese, which leaves open the question of whether other Asian or Western companies can compete in the LFP market. (Stellantis chose SVOLT as one of its battery suppliers from 2025 onwards.)</p><p><blockquote>Rawles表示，他预计未来几年北美和欧洲将出现一些LFP产能，特别是在专利到期后。他指出，宁德时代和另一家电池制造商SVOLT都一直在德国采取行动，但这两家公司都是中国公司，这就留下了其他亚洲或西方公司能否在磷酸铁锂市场竞争的问题。（Stellantis选择SVOLT作为2025年起的电池供应商之一。）</blockquote></p><p></p><p> On the energy storage front, Jaffe said he thinks “it's inevitable that most stationary storage systems will eventually be LFP.”</p><p><blockquote>在储能方面，Jaffe表示，他认为“大多数固定式储能系统最终都将是LFP，这是不可避免的。”</blockquote></p><p> However, not all is lost for domestic manufacturing in the United States. “The good news for building local LFP manufacturing is that the supply chain is simple: Outside of lithium, it's iron and phosphoric acid, two cheap materials already made [in the U.S.] in large quantities,” Jaffe added.</p><p><blockquote>然而，美国国内制造业并没有失去一切。“建设本地磷酸铁锂制造的好消息是供应链很简单：除了锂之外，还有铁和磷酸，这两种廉价材料已经在美国大量生产，”Jaffe补充道。</blockquote></p><p> In the end, it is not a question of one battery chemistry versus another. What’s more likely is what we’ve already started to see from automakers, including Tesla: Iron-based batteries will be used predominately in entry-level and cheaper vehicles, while nickel-based cells will be used for higher-end and performance cars. Many consumers will likely be content with a 200- to 250-mile-range vehicle that's thousands of dollars cheaper than one with a range of 300 to 350 miles.</p><p><blockquote>最终，这不是一种电池化学性质与另一种电池化学性质的问题。更有可能的是我们已经开始从包括特斯拉在内的汽车制造商那里看到的情况：铁基电池将主要用于入门级和更便宜的汽车，而镍基电池将用于更高端和高性能的汽车。许多消费者可能会满足于续航里程为200至250英里的车辆，这种车辆比续航里程为300至350英里的车辆便宜数千美元。</blockquote></p><p> Automakers have also begun making moves to take control of the battery supply, whether through vertical manufacturing or joint ventures with established battery companies. That means that growing LFP capacity in North America and Europe is not only likely, but inevitable.</p><p><blockquote>汽车制造商也开始采取措施控制电池供应，无论是通过垂直制造还是与老牌电池公司合资。这意味着北美和欧洲磷酸铁锂产能的增长不仅是可能的，而且是不可避免的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tesla-bet-iron-based-batteries-143934016.html\">finance.yahoo</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tesla-bet-iron-based-batteries-143934016.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191251432","content_text":"Elon Musk earlier this week made his most bullish statements yet on iron-based batteries, noting that Tesla is making a “long-term shift” toward older, cheaper lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cells in its energy storage products and some entry-level EVs.\nThe Tesla CEO mused that the company's batteries may eventually be roughly two-thirds iron-based and one-third nickel-based across its products. “And this is actually good because there’s plenty of iron in the world,” he added.\nMusk's comments reflect a change that is already underway within the automotive sector, mainly in China. Battery chemistries outside of China have been predominantly nickel-based -- specifically nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) and nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA). These newer chemistries have become attractive to automakers due to their higher energy density, letting original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) improve the range of their batteries.\nIf Musk's bullishness is heralding a genuine shift across the EV industry, the question is whether battery makers outside of China will be able to keep up.\nMusk is not the only automotive executive to signal a return to the LFP formula. Earlier this year, Ford CEO Jim Farley said the company would use LFP batteries in some commercial vehicles. Meanwhile, Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess announced during the company’s inaugural battery day presentation that LFP would be used in some VW entry-level EVs.\nOn the energy storage front, Musk's comments about using LFP-based chemistries in Powerwall and Megapack are in line with other stationary energy storage companies pushing for iron-based formulas. “The stationary storage industry wants to move to LFP because it's cheaper,” Sam Jaffe, who heads the battery research firm Cairn Energy Research Advisors, told TechCrunch.\nLFP battery cells are attractive for a few different reasons. For one, they’re not dependent on ultra-scarce and price-volatile raw materials like cobalt and nickel. (Cobalt, which is predominantly sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo, has undergone additional scrutiny due to inhumane mining conditions.) And while they are less energy-dense than nickel-based chemistries, LFP batteries are much cheaper. This is good news for those looking to spur the shift to electric vehicles because lowering the cost per vehicle will likely be key to greater EV adoption.\nMusk clearly sees a major future for iron-based chemistries at Tesla, and his comments have helped thrust LFP back into the spotlight. But there's one place where they've remained the star of the show: China.\nChina’s monopoly on LFP\n“LFP is pretty much only produced in China,” Caspar Rawles, head of price and data assessments at the research firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, explained in a recent interview with TechCrunch.\nChina’s dominance in LFP battery production in part relates to a series of key LFP patents, which are managed by a consortium of universities and research institutions. This consortium came to an agreement with Chinese battery makers a decade ago under which the manufacturers would not be charged a licensing fee providing that the LFP batteries were used only in Chinese markets.\nHence, China cornered the LFP market.\nBattery makers in China may benefit most from a potential tectonic shift toward LFP -- specifically BYD and CATL, the latter of which already manufactures LFP batteries for Tesla vehicles built and sold in China. (Volkswagen, meanwhile, has a substantial stake in Chinese LFP maker Gotion High-Tech.) These battery makers aren’t slowing down: In January, CATL and Shenzhen Dynanonic signed an agreement with a local Chinese province to build an LFP cathode plant at a cost of $280 million over three years.\nThe LFP patents are due to expire in 2022, industry analystRoskill explains, which could give battery manufacturers outside China time to start shifting some of their production toward iron-based formulas. However, all of the planned battery factories in Europe and North America, many of which are joint ventures with South Korean industry giants like LG Chem or SK Innovation, are still focused on nickel-based chemistries.\n“For the U.S. to take advantage of LFP's strengths, North American manufacturing will be necessary,” Jaffe explained. “Everyone building a gigafactory in the U.S. today is planning on making high nickel chemistries. There's an enormous unmet need for locally manufactured LFP batteries.”\nRawles said he expects some LFP capacity in North America and Europe in the coming years, particularly after the patents expire. He pointed out that both CATL and SVOLT, another battery maker, have been making moves in Germany -- but both of these companies are Chinese, which leaves open the question of whether other Asian or Western companies can compete in the LFP market. (Stellantis chose SVOLT as one of its battery suppliers from 2025 onwards.)\nOn the energy storage front, Jaffe said he thinks “it's inevitable that most stationary storage systems will eventually be LFP.”\nHowever, not all is lost for domestic manufacturing in the United States. “The good news for building local LFP manufacturing is that the supply chain is simple: Outside of lithium, it's iron and phosphoric acid, two cheap materials already made [in the U.S.] in large quantities,” Jaffe added.\nIn the end, it is not a question of one battery chemistry versus another. What’s more likely is what we’ve already started to see from automakers, including Tesla: Iron-based batteries will be used predominately in entry-level and cheaper vehicles, while nickel-based cells will be used for higher-end and performance cars. Many consumers will likely be content with a 200- to 250-mile-range vehicle that's thousands of dollars cheaper than one with a range of 300 to 350 miles.\nAutomakers have also begun making moves to take control of the battery supply, whether through vertical manufacturing or joint ventures with established battery companies. That means that growing LFP capacity in North America and Europe is not only likely, but inevitable.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":836,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176342567,"gmtCreate":1626866865059,"gmtModify":1633770305966,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lidar? Whats the safety rating for that? How abt the cost of having lidar system?","listText":"Lidar? Whats the safety rating for that? How abt the cost of having lidar system?","text":"Lidar? Whats the safety rating for that? How abt the cost of having lidar system?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176342567","repostId":"1185755047","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1185755047","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626858312,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1185755047?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 17:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nio Supplier Say If Chinese Automakers Want To Overtake Tesla, LiDAR Is Key<blockquote>蔚来供应商称中国汽车制造商若想超越特斯拉，激光雷达是关键</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185755047","media":"Benzinga","summary":"NIO Inc. LiDAR supplier Innovusion believes radar-based technology is the key for Chinese car compan","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">NIO Inc.</a></b>&nbsp;LiDAR supplier Innovusion believes radar-based technology is the key for Chinese car companies to overtake bigger rival and electric vehicle segment disruptor&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a></b>, according to a cnEVpostreport.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">蔚来</a></b>激光雷达供应商Innovusion认为，基于雷达的技术是中国车企超越更大竞争对手和电动汽车领域颠覆者的关键<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a></b>，根据cnEVpostreport。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Bao Junwei, CEO of Innovusion, said LiDAR technology could provide rival automakers key leverage as Tesla focuses on the vision-based technology instead.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>Innovusion首席执行官鲍俊伟表示，激光雷达技术可以为竞争对手汽车制造商提供关键杠杆，因为特斯拉专注于基于视觉的技术。</blockquote></p><p> As per Bao, other companies can't match Tesla in vision algorithm and chips at this pount of time but the Musk company doesn't have the advantage gained by an early layout in LiDAR.</p><p><blockquote>鲍表示，目前其他公司在视觉算法和芯片方面无法与特斯拉匹敌，但马斯克的公司并不具备早期布局激光雷达所获得的优势。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla has recently switched to strictly cameras and stopped using radar sensors.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉最近改用严格的摄像头，并停止使用雷达传感器。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The Palo Alto, California-based company’s CEO Elon Musk believes that light or camera-based vision is more accurate than radar as the radar introduces more noise than helpful data in a sensor fusion system.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>这家总部位于加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托的公司首席执行官埃隆·马斯克认为，基于光或摄像头的视觉比雷达更准确，因为雷达在传感器融合系统中引入的噪声比有用数据更多。</blockquote></p><p> Nio’s premium electric sedan ET7, which is expected to begin deliveries in the first quarter of 2022,is equipped withInnovusion’s LiDAR technology.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来的高端电动轿车ET7预计将于2022年第一季度开始交付，配备了Innovusion的激光雷达技术。</blockquote></p><p> Innovision claims its LiDAR has a half a kilometer range and a distance precision of fewer than three centimeters. The company had in June said the LiDAR technology works on the L3 and L4 autonomous driving and complements the L2 autonomous driving as well.</p><p><blockquote>Innovision声称其激光雷达的射程为半公里，距离精度不到三厘米。该公司在6月份表示，激光雷达技术适用于L3和L4自动驾驶，也是L2自动驾驶的补充。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Nio shares closed 1.89% higher at $44.17 on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格走势：</b>蔚来股价周二收盘上涨1.89%，至44.17美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nio Supplier Say If Chinese Automakers Want To Overtake Tesla, LiDAR Is Key<blockquote>蔚来供应商称中国汽车制造商若想超越特斯拉，激光雷达是关键</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNio Supplier Say If Chinese Automakers Want To Overtake Tesla, LiDAR Is Key<blockquote>蔚来供应商称中国汽车制造商若想超越特斯拉，激光雷达是关键</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-21 17:05</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">NIO Inc.</a></b>&nbsp;LiDAR supplier Innovusion believes radar-based technology is the key for Chinese car companies to overtake bigger rival and electric vehicle segment disruptor&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a></b>, according to a cnEVpostreport.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">蔚来</a></b>激光雷达供应商Innovusion认为，基于雷达的技术是中国车企超越更大竞争对手和电动汽车领域颠覆者的关键<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a></b>，根据cnEVpostreport。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Bao Junwei, CEO of Innovusion, said LiDAR technology could provide rival automakers key leverage as Tesla focuses on the vision-based technology instead.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>Innovusion首席执行官鲍俊伟表示，激光雷达技术可以为竞争对手汽车制造商提供关键杠杆，因为特斯拉专注于基于视觉的技术。</blockquote></p><p> As per Bao, other companies can't match Tesla in vision algorithm and chips at this pount of time but the Musk company doesn't have the advantage gained by an early layout in LiDAR.</p><p><blockquote>鲍表示，目前其他公司在视觉算法和芯片方面无法与特斯拉匹敌，但马斯克的公司并不具备早期布局激光雷达所获得的优势。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla has recently switched to strictly cameras and stopped using radar sensors.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉最近改用严格的摄像头，并停止使用雷达传感器。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The Palo Alto, California-based company’s CEO Elon Musk believes that light or camera-based vision is more accurate than radar as the radar introduces more noise than helpful data in a sensor fusion system.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>这家总部位于加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托的公司首席执行官埃隆·马斯克认为，基于光或摄像头的视觉比雷达更准确，因为雷达在传感器融合系统中引入的噪声比有用数据更多。</blockquote></p><p> Nio’s premium electric sedan ET7, which is expected to begin deliveries in the first quarter of 2022,is equipped withInnovusion’s LiDAR technology.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来的高端电动轿车ET7预计将于2022年第一季度开始交付，配备了Innovusion的激光雷达技术。</blockquote></p><p> Innovision claims its LiDAR has a half a kilometer range and a distance precision of fewer than three centimeters. The company had in June said the LiDAR technology works on the L3 and L4 autonomous driving and complements the L2 autonomous driving as well.</p><p><blockquote>Innovision声称其激光雷达的射程为半公里，距离精度不到三厘米。该公司在6月份表示，激光雷达技术适用于L3和L4自动驾驶，也是L2自动驾驶的补充。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Nio shares closed 1.89% higher at $44.17 on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格走势：</b>蔚来股价周二收盘上涨1.89%，至44.17美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185755047","content_text":"NIO Inc. LiDAR supplier Innovusion believes radar-based technology is the key for Chinese car companies to overtake bigger rival and electric vehicle segment disruptor Tesla Motors, according to a cnEVpostreport.\nWhat Happened: Bao Junwei, CEO of Innovusion, said LiDAR technology could provide rival automakers key leverage as Tesla focuses on the vision-based technology instead.\nAs per Bao, other companies can't match Tesla in vision algorithm and chips at this pount of time but the Musk company doesn't have the advantage gained by an early layout in LiDAR.\nTesla has recently switched to strictly cameras and stopped using radar sensors.\nWhy It Matters: The Palo Alto, California-based company’s CEO Elon Musk believes that light or camera-based vision is more accurate than radar as the radar introduces more noise than helpful data in a sensor fusion system.\nNio’s premium electric sedan ET7, which is expected to begin deliveries in the first quarter of 2022,is equipped withInnovusion’s LiDAR technology.\nInnovision claims its LiDAR has a half a kilometer range and a distance precision of fewer than three centimeters. The company had in June said the LiDAR technology works on the L3 and L4 autonomous driving and complements the L2 autonomous driving as well.\nPrice Action: Nio shares closed 1.89% higher at $44.17 on Tuesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":794,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171071737,"gmtCreate":1626699871129,"gmtModify":1633924847067,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Anyone forgot how much the park assist from some Europe company? Oh! Almost 1000!","listText":"Anyone forgot how much the park assist from some Europe company? Oh! Almost 1000!","text":"Anyone forgot how much the park assist from some Europe company? Oh! Almost 1000!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171071737","repostId":"1185915188","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":726,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":141832526,"gmtCreate":1625845809065,"gmtModify":1633936728683,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"This battery changing thingy is stupid. The reason why NIO did this is due to the fact they do not have good battery technology! Can you imagine swapping&nbsp;ur new NIO car battery with a 3 year old battery that was used previously by another car? Come on.. setting this additional infrastucture is another cost. Did anyone check hw long they need need wait to change the battery? How abt the person in front of u?","listText":"This battery changing thingy is stupid. The reason why NIO did this is due to the fact they do not have good battery technology! Can you imagine swapping&nbsp;ur new NIO car battery with a 3 year old battery that was used previously by another car? Come on.. setting this additional infrastucture is another cost. Did anyone check hw long they need need wait to change the battery? How abt the person in front of u?","text":"This battery changing thingy is stupid. The reason why NIO did this is due to the fact they do not have good battery technology! Can you imagine swapping ur new NIO car battery with a 3 year old battery that was used previously by another car? Come on.. setting this additional infrastucture is another cost. Did anyone check hw long they need need wait to change the battery? How abt the person in front of u?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/141832526","repostId":"2150434370","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":706,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143040201,"gmtCreate":1625753548903,"gmtModify":1633937671887,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Johnson again? Omg..&nbsp; anyone but him!","listText":"Johnson again? Omg..&nbsp; anyone but him!","text":"Johnson again? Omg.. anyone but him!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/143040201","repostId":"2149340753","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":698,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":149470609,"gmtCreate":1625746214701,"gmtModify":1633937798678,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It is coming. Nobdoy can sell that type of car at that cost. There maybe some cheap car in Chin, but come on. It is like peanuts compare to apple.","listText":"It is coming. Nobdoy can sell that type of car at that cost. There maybe some cheap car in Chin, but come on. It is like peanuts compare to apple.","text":"It is coming. Nobdoy can sell that type of car at that cost. There maybe some cheap car in Chin, but come on. It is like peanuts compare to apple.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/149470609","repostId":"2149652344","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":727,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152357591,"gmtCreate":1625272545613,"gmtModify":1633941945063,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"What abt from debt perspective? Gm hae massive debt to clear and thats before even step up on EV production","listText":"What abt from debt perspective? Gm hae massive debt to clear and thats before even step up on EV production","text":"What abt from debt perspective? Gm hae massive debt to clear and thats before even step up on EV production","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/152357591","repostId":"2148380690","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":692,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":156435858,"gmtCreate":1625233713274,"gmtModify":1633942259237,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I told u so!","listText":"I told u so!","text":"I told u so!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/156435858","repostId":"124003499","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":124003499,"gmtCreate":1624701978911,"gmtModify":1633949433880,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"700 is coming in July! Lucky 7!","listText":"700 is coming in July! Lucky 7!","text":"700 is coming in July! Lucky 7!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aefb37bd32ad878d25c6b03d95e6ddc9","width":"1080","height":"2233"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/124003499","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":637,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":156540210,"gmtCreate":1625232467330,"gmtModify":1631887105164,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tts fine. As the ETF, ARK will need to show growth to the shareholders. As long as ARK didnt sell all stocks, it is just a short term profit only.","listText":"Tts fine. As the ETF, ARK will need to show growth to the shareholders. As long as ARK didnt sell all stocks, it is just a short term profit only.","text":"Tts fine. As the ETF, ARK will need to show growth to the shareholders. As long as ARK didnt sell all stocks, it is just a short term profit only.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/156540210","repostId":"2148725958","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":156556160,"gmtCreate":1625232187850,"gmtModify":1633942296130,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582704169214897","idStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Otw to 1M!","listText":"Otw to 1M!","text":"Otw to 1M!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/156556160","repostId":"1120069636","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120069636","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1625229204,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1120069636?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-02 20:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Q2 2021 produced and delivered over 200,000 vehicles<blockquote>特斯拉2021年Q2生产交付超20万辆</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120069636","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla Inc on Friday posted a record 201,250 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter, beating Wall ","content":"<p>Tesla Inc on Friday posted a record 201,250 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter, beating Wall Street estimates, despite Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk's earlier warnings about a shortage of chips and raw materials.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉公司周五公布第二季度汽车交付量达到创纪录的201,250辆，超出华尔街预期，尽管首席执行官Elon Musk早些时候警告芯片和原材料短缺。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts had expected the electric-car maker to deliver 200,258 vehicles, according to Refinitiv data.</p><p><blockquote>根据Refinitiv的数据，分析师此前预计这家电动汽车制造商将交付200,258辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9611b4752891866d4583a65f27b75163\" tg-width=\"1030\" tg-height=\"243\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Tesla&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;0.64%&nbsp;in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价在盘前交易中下跌0。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/737a9e557f3d740246a28b0faa8fcc42\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"663\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Q2 2021 produced and delivered over 200,000 vehicles<blockquote>特斯拉2021年Q2生产交付超20万辆</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Q2 2021 produced and delivered over 200,000 vehicles<blockquote>特斯拉2021年Q2生产交付超20万辆</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-02 20:33</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla Inc on Friday posted a record 201,250 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter, beating Wall Street estimates, despite Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk's earlier warnings about a shortage of chips and raw materials.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉公司周五公布第二季度汽车交付量达到创纪录的201,250辆，超出华尔街预期，尽管首席执行官Elon Musk早些时候警告芯片和原材料短缺。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts had expected the electric-car maker to deliver 200,258 vehicles, according to Refinitiv data.</p><p><blockquote>根据Refinitiv的数据，分析师此前预计这家电动汽车制造商将交付200,258辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9611b4752891866d4583a65f27b75163\" tg-width=\"1030\" tg-height=\"243\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Tesla&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;0.64%&nbsp;in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价在盘前交易中下跌0。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/737a9e557f3d740246a28b0faa8fcc42\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"663\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120069636","content_text":"Tesla Inc on Friday posted a record 201,250 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter, beating Wall Street estimates, despite Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk's earlier warnings about a shortage of chips and raw materials.\nAnalysts had expected the electric-car maker to deliver 200,258 vehicles, according to Refinitiv data.\n\nTesla shares fell 0.64% in premarket trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":484,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":182133784,"gmtCreate":1623557067148,"gmtModify":1631885616244,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a>2000s we used friendster,msn messenger, iqc. 2010s we used snapchat, facebook. The 20X0 we will be in a metaverse to communciate and socialise with one another. This will be the next big disrupt. Agree?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a>2000s we used friendster,msn messenger, iqc. 2010s we used snapchat, facebook. The 20X0 we will be in a metaverse to communciate and socialise with one another. This will be the next big disrupt. Agree?","text":"$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$2000s we used friendster,msn messenger, iqc. 2010s we used snapchat, facebook. The 20X0 we will be in a metaverse to communciate and socialise with one another. This will be the next big disrupt. Agree?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/182133784","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2559,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":116196650,"gmtCreate":1622778900870,"gmtModify":1634098084463,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>Think of TSLA as a technology company. If yr mindset is fix on them been just a automotive company, then you're not seeing the bigger future. TSLA, in coming years, will be the greatest and biggest company on this planet. Agree?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>Think of TSLA as a technology company. If yr mindset is fix on them been just a automotive company, then you're not seeing the bigger future. TSLA, in coming years, will be the greatest and biggest company on this planet. Agree?","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$Think of TSLA as a technology company. If yr mindset is fix on them been just a automotive company, then you're not seeing the bigger future. TSLA, in coming years, will be the greatest and biggest company on this planet. Agree?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/116196650","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":931,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896862506,"gmtCreate":1628570027505,"gmtModify":1633746063773,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Data dont lie.&nbsp;We all know how the media works. They dont show the full data as compared to other makers. Anyway, it is good that the media and the bears continue to smear tesla. It shows that they are afraid of Tesla dominance. Uo my conviction again!","listText":"Data dont lie.&nbsp;We all know how the media works. They dont show the full data as compared to other makers. Anyway, it is good that the media and the bears continue to smear tesla. It shows that they are afraid of Tesla dominance. Uo my conviction again!","text":"Data dont lie. We all know how the media works. They dont show the full data as compared to other makers. Anyway, it is good that the media and the bears continue to smear tesla. It shows that they are afraid of Tesla dominance. Uo my conviction again!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896862506","repostId":"1112813252","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1112813252","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628557163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1112813252?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-10 08:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Says Fires Are 11x Less Likely For Its Vehicles Compared To The Average US Vehicle<blockquote>特斯拉表示，其车辆发生火灾的可能性比美国普通车辆低11倍</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112813252","media":"Benzinga","summary":"While articles covering a fire involving a Tesla Motors vehicle seem to be common, news of non-elect","content":"<p>While articles covering a&nbsp;fire involving a&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> vehicle&nbsp;seem to be common,&nbsp;news of&nbsp;non-electric vehicles&nbsp;burning&nbsp;is&nbsp;rare, although there were an estimated&nbsp;212,500 vehicle fires&nbsp;in 2018 alone, according to the&nbsp;<b>National Fire Protection Association</b>&nbsp;(NFPA).</p><p><blockquote>而报道火灾的文章涉及<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>车辆似乎很常见，但非电动汽车燃烧的消息很少，尽管仅在2018年就估计有212,500起车辆火灾<b>国家消防协会</b>（NFPA）。</blockquote></p><p> Now Tesla is releasing new data in its2020 impact report, showing&nbsp;<b>fires in its vehicles are 11x less likely</b>&nbsp;<b>than other vehicles in the U.S.</b>&nbsp;Tesla points out that while vehicle fires in the media often point to EVs, the reasoning may be the rarity of an electric vehicle fire, rather than the prevalence.</p><p><blockquote>现在特斯拉在其2020年影响报告中发布了新数据，显示<b>其车辆发生火灾的可能性降低了11倍</b> <b>比美国的其他车辆。</b>特斯拉指出，虽然媒体上的车辆火灾经常指向电动汽车，但原因可能是电动汽车火灾的罕见性，而不是普遍性。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla's data shows there was one Tesla fire every 205 million miles from 2012 to 2020. This is compared with data from the NFPA showing on average there is a vehicle fire every 19 million miles. Tesla also points out that its vehicle fire data include fires from structures, arson and other reasons, as to be comparable with NFPA data.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的数据显示，从2012年到2020年，每2.05亿英里就会发生一起特斯拉火灾。相比之下，NFPA的数据显示，平均每1900万英里就会发生一起车辆火灾。特斯拉还指出，其车辆火灾数据包括建筑物、纵火和其他原因引起的火灾，以便与NFPA的数据具有可比性。</blockquote></p><p> The company says it is continually working to improve the safety of its cars, including modifications to battery chemistry and enclosures to minimize fire risk, as well as maximize fire containment in the event of a fire. Tesla also provides&nbsp;ample information&nbsp;for first responders to be ready to have the fastest and most effective response in a fire event.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示，它正在不断努力提高汽车的安全性，包括修改电池化学和外壳，以最大限度地降低火灾风险，并在发生火灾时最大限度地控制火灾。特斯拉还为急救人员提供了充足的信息，以便在火灾事件中做出最快、最有效的反应。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Says Fires Are 11x Less Likely For Its Vehicles Compared To The Average US Vehicle<blockquote>特斯拉表示，其车辆发生火灾的可能性比美国普通车辆低11倍</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Says Fires Are 11x Less Likely For Its Vehicles Compared To The Average US Vehicle<blockquote>特斯拉表示，其车辆发生火灾的可能性比美国普通车辆低11倍</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-10 08:59</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>While articles covering a&nbsp;fire involving a&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> vehicle&nbsp;seem to be common,&nbsp;news of&nbsp;non-electric vehicles&nbsp;burning&nbsp;is&nbsp;rare, although there were an estimated&nbsp;212,500 vehicle fires&nbsp;in 2018 alone, according to the&nbsp;<b>National Fire Protection Association</b>&nbsp;(NFPA).</p><p><blockquote>而报道火灾的文章涉及<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>车辆似乎很常见，但非电动汽车燃烧的消息很少，尽管仅在2018年就估计有212,500起车辆火灾<b>国家消防协会</b>（NFPA）。</blockquote></p><p> Now Tesla is releasing new data in its2020 impact report, showing&nbsp;<b>fires in its vehicles are 11x less likely</b>&nbsp;<b>than other vehicles in the U.S.</b>&nbsp;Tesla points out that while vehicle fires in the media often point to EVs, the reasoning may be the rarity of an electric vehicle fire, rather than the prevalence.</p><p><blockquote>现在特斯拉在其2020年影响报告中发布了新数据，显示<b>其车辆发生火灾的可能性降低了11倍</b> <b>比美国的其他车辆。</b>特斯拉指出，虽然媒体上的车辆火灾经常指向电动汽车，但原因可能是电动汽车火灾的罕见性，而不是普遍性。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla's data shows there was one Tesla fire every 205 million miles from 2012 to 2020. This is compared with data from the NFPA showing on average there is a vehicle fire every 19 million miles. Tesla also points out that its vehicle fire data include fires from structures, arson and other reasons, as to be comparable with NFPA data.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉的数据显示，从2012年到2020年，每2.05亿英里就会发生一起特斯拉火灾。相比之下，NFPA的数据显示，平均每1900万英里就会发生一起车辆火灾。特斯拉还指出，其车辆火灾数据包括建筑物、纵火和其他原因引起的火灾，以便与NFPA的数据具有可比性。</blockquote></p><p> The company says it is continually working to improve the safety of its cars, including modifications to battery chemistry and enclosures to minimize fire risk, as well as maximize fire containment in the event of a fire. Tesla also provides&nbsp;ample information&nbsp;for first responders to be ready to have the fastest and most effective response in a fire event.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示，它正在不断努力提高汽车的安全性，包括修改电池化学和外壳，以最大限度地降低火灾风险，并在发生火灾时最大限度地控制火灾。特斯拉还为急救人员提供了充足的信息，以便在火灾事件中做出最快、最有效的反应。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112813252","content_text":"While articles covering a fire involving a Tesla Motors vehicle seem to be common, news of non-electric vehicles burning is rare, although there were an estimated 212,500 vehicle fires in 2018 alone, according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).\nNow Tesla is releasing new data in its2020 impact report, showing fires in its vehicles are 11x less likely than other vehicles in the U.S. Tesla points out that while vehicle fires in the media often point to EVs, the reasoning may be the rarity of an electric vehicle fire, rather than the prevalence.\nTesla's data shows there was one Tesla fire every 205 million miles from 2012 to 2020. This is compared with data from the NFPA showing on average there is a vehicle fire every 19 million miles. Tesla also points out that its vehicle fire data include fires from structures, arson and other reasons, as to be comparable with NFPA data.\nThe company says it is continually working to improve the safety of its cars, including modifications to battery chemistry and enclosures to minimize fire risk, as well as maximize fire containment in the event of a fire. Tesla also provides ample information for first responders to be ready to have the fastest and most effective response in a fire event.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3831,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3479274702625278","authorId":"3479274702625278","name":"老夫追涨杀跌","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d8be38e6bbbfa27d16721be9a4e59b","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3479274702625278","authorIdStr":"3479274702625278"},"content":"如果特斯拉不能起来，那么这个赛道又有哪个企业能成？","text":"如果特斯拉不能起来，那么这个赛道又有哪个企业能成？","html":"如果特斯拉不能起来，那么这个赛道又有哪个企业能成？"},{"author":{"id":"9000000000000221","authorId":"9000000000000221","name":"搞钱树","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82edc4968feb7c0c481f5ad38d9a498b","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"9000000000000221","authorIdStr":"9000000000000221"},"content":"嗯，不明白特斯拉价值的人就会被洗出来。","text":"嗯，不明白特斯拉价值的人就会被洗出来。","html":"嗯，不明白特斯拉价值的人就会被洗出来。"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":124003499,"gmtCreate":1624701978911,"gmtModify":1633949433880,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"700 is coming in July! Lucky 7!","listText":"700 is coming in July! Lucky 7!","text":"700 is coming in July! Lucky 7!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aefb37bd32ad878d25c6b03d95e6ddc9","width":"1080","height":"2233"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":2,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/124003499","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":781,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125034429,"gmtCreate":1624636232861,"gmtModify":1633950205229,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tts apple to peanut comparison. nio still have a lot to prove.","listText":"Tts apple to peanut comparison. nio still have a lot to prove.","text":"Tts apple to peanut comparison. nio still have a lot to prove.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125034429","repostId":"1198714523","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":541,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":138120904,"gmtCreate":1621918644108,"gmtModify":1631889015229,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"SE is a perfectly execute company with 3 business segment targeting the growth market. Gaming will continue to be huge. E commerce is still largely untap in Asia. Digital currency will disrupt traditional fiance system. Cant wait.","listText":"SE is a perfectly execute company with 3 business segment targeting the growth market. Gaming will continue to be huge. E commerce is still largely untap in Asia. Digital currency will disrupt traditional fiance system. Cant wait.","text":"SE is a perfectly execute company with 3 business segment targeting the growth market. Gaming will continue to be huge. E commerce is still largely untap in Asia. Digital currency will disrupt traditional fiance system. Cant wait.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/138120904","repostId":"1154364832","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":665,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150944024,"gmtCreate":1624884805268,"gmtModify":1633947543289,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Finally some sensible comment here.","listText":"Finally some sensible comment here.","text":"Finally some sensible comment here.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/150944024","repostId":"1118489554","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":478,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":167494994,"gmtCreate":1624281241218,"gmtModify":1634008489043,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Whether it is \"true\" profit or not. The cold hard fact is Tesla is getting the cash flow postive and this bonus will boost their financial even stronger than before.&nbsp;","listText":"Whether it is \"true\" profit or not. The cold hard fact is Tesla is getting the cash flow postive and this bonus will boost their financial even stronger than before.&nbsp;","text":"Whether it is \"true\" profit or not. The cold hard fact is Tesla is getting the cash flow postive and this bonus will boost their financial even stronger than before.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/167494994","repostId":"1100861051","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1100861051","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624280482,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1100861051?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-21 21:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla’s Profitability and the Surprising Thing That Could Threaten It<blockquote>特斯拉的盈利能力以及可能威胁它的令人惊讶的事情</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100861051","media":"The Street","summary":"Rising competition in the electric vehicle space could not only put a crimp in Tesla’s growth rate, ","content":"<p>  Rising competition in the electric vehicle space could not only put a crimp in Tesla’s growth rate, but diminish a big source of income as well.  The explosion in electric vehicle (EV) demand has served to vindicate the vision of Tesla’s&nbsp;(<b>TSLA</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;celebrity CEO Elon Musk. Indeed, the surge in demand for EVs has not only vindicated his foresight, but allowed his company to remain a market leader above late-coming competitors.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域日益激烈的竞争不仅会抑制特斯拉的增长率，还会减少一大收入来源。电动汽车(EV)需求的爆炸式增长证明了特斯拉的愿景（<b>特斯拉</b>）-获取名人首席执行官埃隆·马斯克的报告。事实上，电动汽车需求的激增不仅证明了他的远见，也让他的公司保持了超越后来者竞争对手的市场领导者地位。</blockquote></p><p> However, while the company Musk leads as Technoking is no doubt a market leader, it has not solely cashed in by beating its competitors in terms of sales. Instead, a key to the company's recent turn to profitability has come from taking advantage of government incentives and selling the excess incentives it holds to these very same competitors. And now that many of these competitors are engaging more aggressively in EVs themselves, Tesla may soon find itself without many of these customers and, therefore, without a significant contributor to its profits.</p><p><blockquote>然而，尽管马斯克领导的Technoking公司无疑是市场领导者，但它并不仅仅通过在销售额上击败竞争对手来获利。相反，该公司最近扭亏为盈的关键来自于利用政府激励措施，并将其持有的多余激励措施出售给这些竞争对手。现在，许多竞争对手都在更积极地涉足电动汽车领域，特斯拉可能很快就会发现自己没有了许多这样的客户，因此也没有对其利润做出重大贡献。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Raking in the Regulatory Credits</b></p><p><blockquote><b>赚取监管信用</b></blockquote></p><p> The credits that Tesla has handsomely profited from are tradable credits offered by various governments around the world for zero-emission vehicles. The fact that they are tradable is crucial since this allows Tesla to sell the credits to other automakers who might not otherwise comply with emission standards without the use of these credits. The set-up allows Tesla to book the credits as purely additive to its top line, with the automakers buying these credits avoiding hefty fines from regulators.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉从中获得丰厚利润的积分是世界各国政府为零排放汽车提供的可交易积分。它们可交易的事实至关重要，因为这使得特斯拉可以将信用额出售给其他汽车制造商，如果不使用这些信用额，这些汽车制造商可能无法遵守排放标准。这种设置允许特斯拉将积分纯粹作为其营收的附加物，汽车制造商购买这些积分可以避免监管机构的巨额罚款。</blockquote></p><p> Per Tesla’s most recent 10-K filing, the company earned $1.58 billion from the sale of these credits in 2020, up from $594 million in the year prior and $419 million in 2018. The year-over -year jump notwithstanding, the credit sales might appear to be a paltry sum given the company’s $31.5 billion in total revenue in 2020. However, their nature as purely profit, in contrast to capital intensive auto manufacturing, means they have been a pivotal part of Tesla’s push towards profitability.</p><p><blockquote>根据特斯拉最近提交的10-K文件，该公司在2020年通过出售这些积分赚取了15.8亿美元，高于上一年的5.94亿美元和2018年的4.19亿美元。尽管同比增长，但考虑到该公司2020年315亿美元的总收入，信贷销售额似乎微不足道。然而，与资本密集型汽车制造业相比，它们纯粹是利润的性质意味着它们一直是特斯拉推动盈利的关键部分。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Tesla’s much-lauded $721 million profit in 2020, the very first profitable full year in its history, was clearly boosted over the top by the surge in regulatory credit sales. Had they remained consistent with the prior periods, the landmark year would have been left short of break-even, keeping up the company's trend of annual losses maintained since its inception.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，特斯拉2020年备受赞誉的7.21亿美元利润，这是其历史上第一个全年盈利的一年，显然是受到监管信贷销售激增的提振。如果它们与前几个时期保持一致，这一具有里程碑意义的一年将无法实现收支平衡，从而保持该公司自成立以来一直保持的年度亏损趋势。</blockquote></p><p> The trend has continued into 2021 as the company reported $518 million in revenues from credit salesin the first quarter, which boosted the company once again to a $438-million quarterly profit. While vehicle deliveries consistently catch the headlines, it's clear that the regulatory credits are buoying the automaker into the black.</p><p><blockquote>这一趋势一直持续到2021年，该公司报告第一季度信贷销售收入为5.18亿美元，这再次使该公司季度利润达到4.38亿美元。虽然汽车交付量不断成为头条新闻，但很明显，监管信贷正在帮助这家汽车制造商实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Competition Cuts Into Cash Flow</b></p><p><blockquote><b>竞争削减现金流</b></blockquote></p><p> The problem with the profit margin may be approaching faster than some have anticipated as well, with the increased entry of traditional automakers like Ford&nbsp;(<b>F</b>) -Get Report, General Motors&nbsp;(<b>GM</b>) -Get Report, and Stellantis STLA into the EV space.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特等传统汽车制造商的加入，利润率问题的解决速度可能也比一些人预期的要快（<b>F</b>)-获取报告，通用汽车(<b>GM</b>)-获取报告，Stellantis STLA进入电动汽车领域。</blockquote></p><p> While much of the focus revolves around these companies’ threat to Tesla’s core auto sales, the popularity of Tesla among its devoted fans might sustain it amidst the hard-charging competition. As such, the trajectory of its sales, while now threatened by competent competition, remains somewhat murky at the moment.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大部分焦点都围绕着这些公司对特斯拉核心汽车销售的威胁，但特斯拉在其忠实粉丝中的受欢迎程度可能会在激烈的竞争中维持其地位。因此，其销售轨迹虽然现在受到激烈竞争的威胁，但目前仍然有些模糊。</blockquote></p><p> The question of regulatory credit impact is much more straightforward. If Tesla’s competitors are producing their own electric vehicles and fewer ICE autos, they have no need to spend so substantially on buying credits from Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>监管信用影响的问题要简单得多。如果特斯拉的竞争对手生产自己的电动汽车并减少内燃机汽车，他们就没有必要花这么多钱从特斯拉购买积分。</blockquote></p><p> Per a Reuters report, Fiat Chrysler agreed to purchase $2.4 billion worth of emissions credits from Tesla from 2019 through 2021, likely accounting for a lion’s share of the roughly $2.2 billion recorded in total in credits sold in Tesla’s 2019 and 2020 10-K filings. However, after Fiat Chrysler merged with French automaker PSA Group in May to form Stellantis, this reliable revenue stream looks likely to fade.</p><p><blockquote>据路透社报道，菲亚特克莱斯勒同意在2019年至2021年期间从特斯拉购买价值24亿美元的排放信用额，这可能占特斯拉2019年和2020年10-K文件中出售的信用额总额约22亿美元的大部分。然而，在菲亚特克莱斯勒5月份与法国汽车制造商PSA集团合并成立Stellantis后，这一可靠的收入来源似乎可能会消失。</blockquote></p><p> \"With the electrical technology that PSA brought to Stellantis, we will autonomously meet carbon dioxide emission regulations as early as this year,\" Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares told French media after the merger. \"Thus, we will not need to call on European CO2 credits and [Fiat Chrysler] will no longer have to pool with Tesla or anyone.\"</p><p><blockquote>Stellantis首席执行官卡洛斯·塔瓦雷斯(Carlos Tavares)在合并后对法国媒体表示：“凭借PSA为Stellantis带来的电气技术，我们最早将在今年自主满足二氧化碳排放法规。”“因此，我们将不需要对欧洲二氧化碳信用额进行看涨期权，[菲亚特克莱斯勒]也将不再需要与特斯拉或任何人合作。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Already Anticipated?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>已经预料到了？</b></blockquote></p><p> To be sure, the looming threat of regulatory credit sales eroding is by no means a novel development. CFO Zachary Kirkhorn noted in a call with analysts in mid-2020 that “we don’t manage the business with the assumption that regulatory credits will contribute significantly to the future. Eventually this will reduce.”</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是，监管信用销售侵蚀的迫在眉睫的威胁绝不是一个新的发展。首席财务官Zachary Kirkhorn在2020年年中与分析师举行的看涨期权中指出，“我们在管理业务时不会假设监管信贷将对未来做出重大贡献。最终这种情况会减少。”</blockquote></p><p> Kirkhorn’s focus on the core business, especially in terms of battery technology, rather than the regulatory credit sales, is bolstered by the thoughts of prominent Tesla bulls.</p><p><blockquote>柯克霍恩专注于核心业务，特别是在电池技术方面，而不是监管信贷销售，这得到了著名特斯拉多头思想的支持。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “We have owned Tesla for a decade and from day one we expected regulatory credits to go to zero within three years,” Jennison Associates analyst Owuraka Koney said. “They are comfortable without these regulatory credits and they make money when you exclude these credits and these non-recurring costs that they face.”</p><p><blockquote>Jennison Associates分析师Owuraka Koney表示：“我们拥有特斯拉已经十年了，从第一天起，我们就预计监管信用将在三年内降至零。”“他们在没有这些监管信贷的情况下也很舒服，当你排除这些信贷和他们面临的这些非经常性成本时，他们就能赚钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Koney cited Elon Musk’smassive compensation packagetied to the company's recent stock surges as a key non-recurring cost in this context. Further, Koney argued that the regulatory credit benefits are being unfairly compared to overall profitability, which he sees as an apples-and-oranges comparison. He explained that the more relevant comparison is to Tesla’s operating income, which was $1.99 billion on a GAAP basis in 2020, up over $2 billion from the figure in 2019. The leap suggests strength greater than that simply achieved via the regulatory credit benefit, in his view.</p><p><blockquote>科尼指出，埃隆·马斯克与公司近期股价飙升相关的巨额薪酬方案是这种情况下的一项关键非经常性成本。此外，科尼认为，监管信贷收益与整体盈利能力相比是不公平的，他认为这是苹果和橘子的比较。他解释说，更相关的比较是特斯拉的营业收入，2020年按GAAP计算为19.9亿美元，比2019年的数字增长了20多亿美元。在他看来，这一飞跃表明了比仅仅通过监管信贷利益实现的实力更强的实力。</blockquote></p><p> Mike Dovororany, VP of Automotive &amp; Mobility at market research firm Escalent, seconded the rosier view held by Koney, reiterating that the risk of regulatory credits fading is well understood by savvy investors, and further that the current U.S. administration might actually aid Tesla’s ability to capitalize on regulation.</p><p><blockquote>市场研究公司Escalent汽车与移动副总裁Mike Dovororany支持Koney持有的乐观观点，重申精明的投资者非常了解监管信用减弱的风险，并进一步表示，现任美国政府实际上可能会帮助特斯拉利用监管的能力。</blockquote></p><p> “Because credit sales have always been the main driver behind Tesla’s profitability, investors should be well-accustomed to this risk,” he explained. “Also, as the Biden Administration looks to reconsider stricter emissions regulations, the EV credit market could become more important than ever.”</p><p><blockquote>“由于信贷销售一直是特斯拉盈利的主要驱动力，投资者应该已经习惯了这种风险，”他解释道。“此外，随着拜登政府寻求重新考虑更严格的排放法规，电动汽车信贷市场可能会变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。”</blockquote></p><p> With the administration now proposing a $174-billion investment in the electric vehicle market aspart of the American Jobs Act, including new tax credits, there is certainly ample reason to be excited. Given Tesla's ability to capitalize on these incentives, it will be worth watching what the final bill entails when it crosses Biden's desk and whether it might mean lead to more big profits for Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>作为《美国就业法案》的一部分，政府现在提议对电动汽车市场投资1740亿美元，包括新的税收抵免，当然有足够的理由感到兴奋。鉴于特斯拉有能力利用这些激励措施，值得关注的是最终法案提交拜登办公桌时会带来什么，以及它是否可能意味着为特斯拉带来更多巨额利润。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla’s Profitability and the Surprising Thing That Could Threaten It<blockquote>特斯拉的盈利能力以及可能威胁它的令人惊讶的事情</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla’s Profitability and the Surprising Thing That Could Threaten It<blockquote>特斯拉的盈利能力以及可能威胁它的令人惊讶的事情</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-21 21:01</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Rising competition in the electric vehicle space could not only put a crimp in Tesla’s growth rate, but diminish a big source of income as well.  The explosion in electric vehicle (EV) demand has served to vindicate the vision of Tesla’s&nbsp;(<b>TSLA</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;celebrity CEO Elon Musk. Indeed, the surge in demand for EVs has not only vindicated his foresight, but allowed his company to remain a market leader above late-coming competitors.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车领域日益激烈的竞争不仅会抑制特斯拉的增长率，还会减少一大收入来源。电动汽车(EV)需求的爆炸式增长证明了特斯拉的愿景（<b>特斯拉</b>）-获取名人首席执行官埃隆·马斯克的报告。事实上，电动汽车需求的激增不仅证明了他的远见，也让他的公司保持了超越后来者竞争对手的市场领导者地位。</blockquote></p><p> However, while the company Musk leads as Technoking is no doubt a market leader, it has not solely cashed in by beating its competitors in terms of sales. Instead, a key to the company's recent turn to profitability has come from taking advantage of government incentives and selling the excess incentives it holds to these very same competitors. And now that many of these competitors are engaging more aggressively in EVs themselves, Tesla may soon find itself without many of these customers and, therefore, without a significant contributor to its profits.</p><p><blockquote>然而，尽管马斯克领导的Technoking公司无疑是市场领导者，但它并不仅仅通过在销售额上击败竞争对手来获利。相反，该公司最近扭亏为盈的关键来自于利用政府激励措施，并将其持有的多余激励措施出售给这些竞争对手。现在，许多竞争对手都在更积极地涉足电动汽车领域，特斯拉可能很快就会发现自己没有了许多这样的客户，因此也没有对其利润做出重大贡献。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Raking in the Regulatory Credits</b></p><p><blockquote><b>赚取监管信用</b></blockquote></p><p> The credits that Tesla has handsomely profited from are tradable credits offered by various governments around the world for zero-emission vehicles. The fact that they are tradable is crucial since this allows Tesla to sell the credits to other automakers who might not otherwise comply with emission standards without the use of these credits. The set-up allows Tesla to book the credits as purely additive to its top line, with the automakers buying these credits avoiding hefty fines from regulators.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉从中获得丰厚利润的积分是世界各国政府为零排放汽车提供的可交易积分。它们可交易的事实至关重要，因为这使得特斯拉可以将信用额出售给其他汽车制造商，如果不使用这些信用额，这些汽车制造商可能无法遵守排放标准。这种设置允许特斯拉将积分纯粹作为其营收的附加物，汽车制造商购买这些积分可以避免监管机构的巨额罚款。</blockquote></p><p> Per Tesla’s most recent 10-K filing, the company earned $1.58 billion from the sale of these credits in 2020, up from $594 million in the year prior and $419 million in 2018. The year-over -year jump notwithstanding, the credit sales might appear to be a paltry sum given the company’s $31.5 billion in total revenue in 2020. However, their nature as purely profit, in contrast to capital intensive auto manufacturing, means they have been a pivotal part of Tesla’s push towards profitability.</p><p><blockquote>根据特斯拉最近提交的10-K文件，该公司在2020年通过出售这些积分赚取了15.8亿美元，高于上一年的5.94亿美元和2018年的4.19亿美元。尽管同比增长，但考虑到该公司2020年315亿美元的总收入，信贷销售额似乎微不足道。然而，与资本密集型汽车制造业相比，它们纯粹是利润的性质意味着它们一直是特斯拉推动盈利的关键部分。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Tesla’s much-lauded $721 million profit in 2020, the very first profitable full year in its history, was clearly boosted over the top by the surge in regulatory credit sales. Had they remained consistent with the prior periods, the landmark year would have been left short of break-even, keeping up the company's trend of annual losses maintained since its inception.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，特斯拉2020年备受赞誉的7.21亿美元利润，这是其历史上第一个全年盈利的一年，显然是受到监管信贷销售激增的提振。如果它们与前几个时期保持一致，这一具有里程碑意义的一年将无法实现收支平衡，从而保持该公司自成立以来一直保持的年度亏损趋势。</blockquote></p><p> The trend has continued into 2021 as the company reported $518 million in revenues from credit salesin the first quarter, which boosted the company once again to a $438-million quarterly profit. While vehicle deliveries consistently catch the headlines, it's clear that the regulatory credits are buoying the automaker into the black.</p><p><blockquote>这一趋势一直持续到2021年，该公司报告第一季度信贷销售收入为5.18亿美元，这再次使该公司季度利润达到4.38亿美元。虽然汽车交付量不断成为头条新闻，但很明显，监管信贷正在帮助这家汽车制造商实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Competition Cuts Into Cash Flow</b></p><p><blockquote><b>竞争削减现金流</b></blockquote></p><p> The problem with the profit margin may be approaching faster than some have anticipated as well, with the increased entry of traditional automakers like Ford&nbsp;(<b>F</b>) -Get Report, General Motors&nbsp;(<b>GM</b>) -Get Report, and Stellantis STLA into the EV space.</p><p><blockquote>随着福特等传统汽车制造商的加入，利润率问题的解决速度可能也比一些人预期的要快（<b>F</b>)-获取报告，通用汽车(<b>GM</b>)-获取报告，Stellantis STLA进入电动汽车领域。</blockquote></p><p> While much of the focus revolves around these companies’ threat to Tesla’s core auto sales, the popularity of Tesla among its devoted fans might sustain it amidst the hard-charging competition. As such, the trajectory of its sales, while now threatened by competent competition, remains somewhat murky at the moment.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大部分焦点都围绕着这些公司对特斯拉核心汽车销售的威胁，但特斯拉在其忠实粉丝中的受欢迎程度可能会在激烈的竞争中维持其地位。因此，其销售轨迹虽然现在受到激烈竞争的威胁，但目前仍然有些模糊。</blockquote></p><p> The question of regulatory credit impact is much more straightforward. If Tesla’s competitors are producing their own electric vehicles and fewer ICE autos, they have no need to spend so substantially on buying credits from Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>监管信用影响的问题要简单得多。如果特斯拉的竞争对手生产自己的电动汽车并减少内燃机汽车，他们就没有必要花这么多钱从特斯拉购买积分。</blockquote></p><p> Per a Reuters report, Fiat Chrysler agreed to purchase $2.4 billion worth of emissions credits from Tesla from 2019 through 2021, likely accounting for a lion’s share of the roughly $2.2 billion recorded in total in credits sold in Tesla’s 2019 and 2020 10-K filings. However, after Fiat Chrysler merged with French automaker PSA Group in May to form Stellantis, this reliable revenue stream looks likely to fade.</p><p><blockquote>据路透社报道，菲亚特克莱斯勒同意在2019年至2021年期间从特斯拉购买价值24亿美元的排放信用额，这可能占特斯拉2019年和2020年10-K文件中出售的信用额总额约22亿美元的大部分。然而，在菲亚特克莱斯勒5月份与法国汽车制造商PSA集团合并成立Stellantis后，这一可靠的收入来源似乎可能会消失。</blockquote></p><p> \"With the electrical technology that PSA brought to Stellantis, we will autonomously meet carbon dioxide emission regulations as early as this year,\" Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares told French media after the merger. \"Thus, we will not need to call on European CO2 credits and [Fiat Chrysler] will no longer have to pool with Tesla or anyone.\"</p><p><blockquote>Stellantis首席执行官卡洛斯·塔瓦雷斯(Carlos Tavares)在合并后对法国媒体表示：“凭借PSA为Stellantis带来的电气技术，我们最早将在今年自主满足二氧化碳排放法规。”“因此，我们将不需要对欧洲二氧化碳信用额进行看涨期权，[菲亚特克莱斯勒]也将不再需要与特斯拉或任何人合作。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Already Anticipated?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>已经预料到了？</b></blockquote></p><p> To be sure, the looming threat of regulatory credit sales eroding is by no means a novel development. CFO Zachary Kirkhorn noted in a call with analysts in mid-2020 that “we don’t manage the business with the assumption that regulatory credits will contribute significantly to the future. Eventually this will reduce.”</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是，监管信用销售侵蚀的迫在眉睫的威胁绝不是一个新的发展。首席财务官Zachary Kirkhorn在2020年年中与分析师举行的看涨期权中指出，“我们在管理业务时不会假设监管信贷将对未来做出重大贡献。最终这种情况会减少。”</blockquote></p><p> Kirkhorn’s focus on the core business, especially in terms of battery technology, rather than the regulatory credit sales, is bolstered by the thoughts of prominent Tesla bulls.</p><p><blockquote>柯克霍恩专注于核心业务，特别是在电池技术方面，而不是监管信贷销售，这得到了著名特斯拉多头思想的支持。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “We have owned Tesla for a decade and from day one we expected regulatory credits to go to zero within three years,” Jennison Associates analyst Owuraka Koney said. “They are comfortable without these regulatory credits and they make money when you exclude these credits and these non-recurring costs that they face.”</p><p><blockquote>Jennison Associates分析师Owuraka Koney表示：“我们拥有特斯拉已经十年了，从第一天起，我们就预计监管信用将在三年内降至零。”“他们在没有这些监管信贷的情况下也很舒服，当你排除这些信贷和他们面临的这些非经常性成本时，他们就能赚钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Koney cited Elon Musk’smassive compensation packagetied to the company's recent stock surges as a key non-recurring cost in this context. Further, Koney argued that the regulatory credit benefits are being unfairly compared to overall profitability, which he sees as an apples-and-oranges comparison. He explained that the more relevant comparison is to Tesla’s operating income, which was $1.99 billion on a GAAP basis in 2020, up over $2 billion from the figure in 2019. The leap suggests strength greater than that simply achieved via the regulatory credit benefit, in his view.</p><p><blockquote>科尼指出，埃隆·马斯克与公司近期股价飙升相关的巨额薪酬方案是这种情况下的一项关键非经常性成本。此外，科尼认为，监管信贷收益与整体盈利能力相比是不公平的，他认为这是苹果和橘子的比较。他解释说，更相关的比较是特斯拉的营业收入，2020年按GAAP计算为19.9亿美元，比2019年的数字增长了20多亿美元。在他看来，这一飞跃表明了比仅仅通过监管信贷利益实现的实力更强的实力。</blockquote></p><p> Mike Dovororany, VP of Automotive &amp; Mobility at market research firm Escalent, seconded the rosier view held by Koney, reiterating that the risk of regulatory credits fading is well understood by savvy investors, and further that the current U.S. administration might actually aid Tesla’s ability to capitalize on regulation.</p><p><blockquote>市场研究公司Escalent汽车与移动副总裁Mike Dovororany支持Koney持有的乐观观点，重申精明的投资者非常了解监管信用减弱的风险，并进一步表示，现任美国政府实际上可能会帮助特斯拉利用监管的能力。</blockquote></p><p> “Because credit sales have always been the main driver behind Tesla’s profitability, investors should be well-accustomed to this risk,” he explained. “Also, as the Biden Administration looks to reconsider stricter emissions regulations, the EV credit market could become more important than ever.”</p><p><blockquote>“由于信贷销售一直是特斯拉盈利的主要驱动力，投资者应该已经习惯了这种风险，”他解释道。“此外，随着拜登政府寻求重新考虑更严格的排放法规，电动汽车信贷市场可能会变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。”</blockquote></p><p> With the administration now proposing a $174-billion investment in the electric vehicle market aspart of the American Jobs Act, including new tax credits, there is certainly ample reason to be excited. Given Tesla's ability to capitalize on these incentives, it will be worth watching what the final bill entails when it crosses Biden's desk and whether it might mean lead to more big profits for Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>作为《美国就业法案》的一部分，政府现在提议对电动汽车市场投资1740亿美元，包括新的税收抵免，当然有足够的理由感到兴奋。鉴于特斯拉有能力利用这些激励措施，值得关注的是最终法案提交拜登办公桌时会带来什么，以及它是否可能意味着为特斯拉带来更多巨额利润。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/surprising-thing-that-could-threaten-teslas-profitability\">The Street</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/surprising-thing-that-could-threaten-teslas-profitability","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100861051","content_text":"Rising competition in the electric vehicle space could not only put a crimp in Tesla’s growth rate, but diminish a big source of income as well.\n\nThe explosion in electric vehicle (EV) demand has served to vindicate the vision of Tesla’s (TSLA) -Get Report celebrity CEO Elon Musk. Indeed, the surge in demand for EVs has not only vindicated his foresight, but allowed his company to remain a market leader above late-coming competitors.\nHowever, while the company Musk leads as Technoking is no doubt a market leader, it has not solely cashed in by beating its competitors in terms of sales. Instead, a key to the company's recent turn to profitability has come from taking advantage of government incentives and selling the excess incentives it holds to these very same competitors. And now that many of these competitors are engaging more aggressively in EVs themselves, Tesla may soon find itself without many of these customers and, therefore, without a significant contributor to its profits.\nRaking in the Regulatory Credits\nThe credits that Tesla has handsomely profited from are tradable credits offered by various governments around the world for zero-emission vehicles. The fact that they are tradable is crucial since this allows Tesla to sell the credits to other automakers who might not otherwise comply with emission standards without the use of these credits. The set-up allows Tesla to book the credits as purely additive to its top line, with the automakers buying these credits avoiding hefty fines from regulators.\nPer Tesla’s most recent 10-K filing, the company earned $1.58 billion from the sale of these credits in 2020, up from $594 million in the year prior and $419 million in 2018. The year-over -year jump notwithstanding, the credit sales might appear to be a paltry sum given the company’s $31.5 billion in total revenue in 2020. However, their nature as purely profit, in contrast to capital intensive auto manufacturing, means they have been a pivotal part of Tesla’s push towards profitability.\nIndeed, Tesla’s much-lauded $721 million profit in 2020, the very first profitable full year in its history, was clearly boosted over the top by the surge in regulatory credit sales. Had they remained consistent with the prior periods, the landmark year would have been left short of break-even, keeping up the company's trend of annual losses maintained since its inception.\nThe trend has continued into 2021 as the company reported $518 million in revenues from credit salesin the first quarter, which boosted the company once again to a $438-million quarterly profit. While vehicle deliveries consistently catch the headlines, it's clear that the regulatory credits are buoying the automaker into the black.\nCompetition Cuts Into Cash Flow\nThe problem with the profit margin may be approaching faster than some have anticipated as well, with the increased entry of traditional automakers like Ford (F) -Get Report, General Motors (GM) -Get Report, and Stellantis STLA into the EV space.\nWhile much of the focus revolves around these companies’ threat to Tesla’s core auto sales, the popularity of Tesla among its devoted fans might sustain it amidst the hard-charging competition. As such, the trajectory of its sales, while now threatened by competent competition, remains somewhat murky at the moment.\nThe question of regulatory credit impact is much more straightforward. If Tesla’s competitors are producing their own electric vehicles and fewer ICE autos, they have no need to spend so substantially on buying credits from Tesla.\nPer a Reuters report, Fiat Chrysler agreed to purchase $2.4 billion worth of emissions credits from Tesla from 2019 through 2021, likely accounting for a lion’s share of the roughly $2.2 billion recorded in total in credits sold in Tesla’s 2019 and 2020 10-K filings. However, after Fiat Chrysler merged with French automaker PSA Group in May to form Stellantis, this reliable revenue stream looks likely to fade.\n\"With the electrical technology that PSA brought to Stellantis, we will autonomously meet carbon dioxide emission regulations as early as this year,\" Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares told French media after the merger. \"Thus, we will not need to call on European CO2 credits and [Fiat Chrysler] will no longer have to pool with Tesla or anyone.\"\nAlready Anticipated?\nTo be sure, the looming threat of regulatory credit sales eroding is by no means a novel development. CFO Zachary Kirkhorn noted in a call with analysts in mid-2020 that “we don’t manage the business with the assumption that regulatory credits will contribute significantly to the future. Eventually this will reduce.”\nKirkhorn’s focus on the core business, especially in terms of battery technology, rather than the regulatory credit sales, is bolstered by the thoughts of prominent Tesla bulls.\n“We have owned Tesla for a decade and from day one we expected regulatory credits to go to zero within three years,” Jennison Associates analyst Owuraka Koney said. “They are comfortable without these regulatory credits and they make money when you exclude these credits and these non-recurring costs that they face.”\nKoney cited Elon Musk’smassive compensation packagetied to the company's recent stock surges as a key non-recurring cost in this context. Further, Koney argued that the regulatory credit benefits are being unfairly compared to overall profitability, which he sees as an apples-and-oranges comparison. He explained that the more relevant comparison is to Tesla’s operating income, which was $1.99 billion on a GAAP basis in 2020, up over $2 billion from the figure in 2019. The leap suggests strength greater than that simply achieved via the regulatory credit benefit, in his view.\nMike Dovororany, VP of Automotive & Mobility at market research firm Escalent, seconded the rosier view held by Koney, reiterating that the risk of regulatory credits fading is well understood by savvy investors, and further that the current U.S. administration might actually aid Tesla’s ability to capitalize on regulation.\n“Because credit sales have always been the main driver behind Tesla’s profitability, investors should be well-accustomed to this risk,” he explained. “Also, as the Biden Administration looks to reconsider stricter emissions regulations, the EV credit market could become more important than ever.”\nWith the administration now proposing a $174-billion investment in the electric vehicle market aspart of the American Jobs Act, including new tax credits, there is certainly ample reason to be excited. Given Tesla's ability to capitalize on these incentives, it will be worth watching what the final bill entails when it crosses Biden's desk and whether it might mean lead to more big profits for Tesla.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":691,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150396297,"gmtCreate":1624886443019,"gmtModify":1633947521968,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>July is going to be great!","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>July is going to be great!","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$July is going to be great!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7829d1a2e2c35d99303a6acc31273987","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/150396297","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":416,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125575763,"gmtCreate":1624682920252,"gmtModify":1633949604974,"author":{"id":"3582704169214897","authorId":"3582704169214897","name":"Ianer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dfad3c43fd6d82b6a4f7c429853f818","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582704169214897","authorIdStr":"3582704169214897"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thats fine. Good initiative. I believe their database had capture enough data to determine the need for recall. Anyhow, the FUD will scream again on this. Pls rmbr. Recall ALWAYS happen and more with othet automotive company.&nbsp;","listText":"Thats fine. Good initiative. I believe their database had capture enough data to determine the need for recall. Anyhow, the FUD will scream again on this. Pls rmbr. Recall ALWAYS happen and more with othet automotive company.&nbsp;","text":"Thats fine. Good initiative. I believe their database had capture enough data to determine the need for recall. Anyhow, the FUD will scream again on this. Pls rmbr. Recall ALWAYS happen and more with othet automotive company.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/125575763","repostId":"1132692662","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1132692662","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624680481,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1132692662?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-26 12:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla recalls some imported and domestic Model 3 and Model Y in China<blockquote>特斯拉在华召回部分进口及国产Model 3和Model Y</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1132692662","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Recently, Tesla filed a recall plan and decided to recall some vehicles from now on,according to China's State Administration of market supervision.Tesla decided to recall 35665 imported Model 3 produced between January 12, 2019 and November 27, 2019.Meanwhile, Tesla will recall some domestic Model 3 produced from December 19, 2019 to June 7, 2021, totaling 211256 vehicles; A total of 38599 domestic Model Y were produced from January 1, 2021 to June 7, 2021.In response to the recall, Tesla said ","content":"<p>Recently, Tesla filed a recall plan and decided to recall some vehicles from now on,according to China's State Administration of market supervision.</p><p><blockquote>据国家市场监督管理总局消息，近日，特斯拉备案了召回计划，决定自即日起召回部分车辆。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla decided to recall 35665 imported Model 3 produced between January 12, 2019 and November 27, 2019.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉决定召回2019年1月12日至2019年11月27日期间生产的35665辆进口Model 3。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, Tesla will recall some domestic Model 3 produced from December 19, 2019 to June 7, 2021, totaling 211256 vehicles; A total of 38599 domestic Model Y were produced from January 1, 2021 to June 7, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>同时，特斯拉将召回2019年12月19日至2021年6月7日生产的部分国产Model 3，共计211256辆；2021年1月1日至2021年6月7日期间生产的国产Model Y共计38599辆。</blockquote></p><p> Due to the problems of the active cruise control system of the vehicles within the scope of this recall, it is easy for the driver to activate the active cruise function by mistake in the following situations: when the vehicle is in D gear, the driver tries to switch the gear by pushing the right control lever again; When the vehicle turns sharply, the driver touches and moves the right control lever by mistake, etc. After the active cruise control is mistakenly activated, if the cruise speed set by the vehicle is not the current speed, and the current speed is lower than the set speed, the vehicle will accelerate to the set speed, resulting in a sudden increase in vehicle speed, which will affect the driver's expectation and lead to misjudgment of vehicle handling. In extreme cases, it may lead to vehicle collision, and there are potential safety hazards.</p><p><blockquote>本次召回范围内车辆由于主动巡航控制系统存在问题，在以下情况下驾驶员容易误激活主动巡航功能：当车辆挂入D挡时，驾驶员试图通过再次推动右侧操纵杆来切换挡位；车辆急转弯时，驾驶员误触并移动右侧操纵杆等。误启动主动巡航控制后，如果车辆设定的巡航速度不是当前速度，而当前速度低于设定速度，车辆就会加速到设定速度，导致车速突然升高，影响驾驶员的预期，导致车辆操控误判。极端情况下可能导致车辆碰撞，存在安全隐患。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla will upgrade the active cruise control software for the recalled vehicles free of charge through OTA technology, so users can complete the software upgrade without going to the store; For vehicles that cannot be recalled through OTA technology, Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. will contact relevant users through Tesla service center to upgrade active cruise control software for vehicles free, so as to eliminate potential safety hazards.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉将通过OTA技术为召回车辆免费升级主动巡航控制软件，用户无需到店即可完成软件升级；对于无法通过OTA技术召回的车辆，特斯拉（北京）有限公司和特斯拉（上海）有限公司将通过特斯拉服务中心联系相关用户，为车辆免费升级主动巡航控制软件，以消除安全隐患。</blockquote></p><p> In response to the recall, Tesla said on June 26 that for the vehicles (Model 3 / Model Y) within the scope of this recall, due to the fact that the active cruise control function may be activated by the driver by mistake, there are potential safety hazards in extreme cases. Tesla took the initiative to file the recall plan with the State Administration of market supervision and administration. Users do not need to go to the store to complete the OTA. Tesla said it apologized for the inconvenience caused by the recall.</p><p><blockquote>针对此次召回，特斯拉6月26日表示，本次召回范围内的车辆（Model 3/Model Y），由于主动巡航控制功能可能被驾驶员误激活，极端情况下存在安全隐患。特斯拉主动向国家市场监督管理总局备案了召回计划。用户无需前往门店即可完成OTA。特斯拉表示，对此次召回给您带来的不便表示歉意。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla recalls some imported and domestic Model 3 and Model Y in China<blockquote>特斯拉在华召回部分进口及国产Model 3和Model Y</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla recalls some imported and domestic Model 3 and Model Y in China<blockquote>特斯拉在华召回部分进口及国产Model 3和Model Y</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-26 12:08</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Recently, Tesla filed a recall plan and decided to recall some vehicles from now on,according to China's State Administration of market supervision.</p><p><blockquote>据国家市场监督管理总局消息，近日，特斯拉备案了召回计划，决定自即日起召回部分车辆。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla decided to recall 35665 imported Model 3 produced between January 12, 2019 and November 27, 2019.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉决定召回2019年1月12日至2019年11月27日期间生产的35665辆进口Model 3。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, Tesla will recall some domestic Model 3 produced from December 19, 2019 to June 7, 2021, totaling 211256 vehicles; A total of 38599 domestic Model Y were produced from January 1, 2021 to June 7, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>同时，特斯拉将召回2019年12月19日至2021年6月7日生产的部分国产Model 3，共计211256辆；2021年1月1日至2021年6月7日期间生产的国产Model Y共计38599辆。</blockquote></p><p> Due to the problems of the active cruise control system of the vehicles within the scope of this recall, it is easy for the driver to activate the active cruise function by mistake in the following situations: when the vehicle is in D gear, the driver tries to switch the gear by pushing the right control lever again; When the vehicle turns sharply, the driver touches and moves the right control lever by mistake, etc. After the active cruise control is mistakenly activated, if the cruise speed set by the vehicle is not the current speed, and the current speed is lower than the set speed, the vehicle will accelerate to the set speed, resulting in a sudden increase in vehicle speed, which will affect the driver's expectation and lead to misjudgment of vehicle handling. In extreme cases, it may lead to vehicle collision, and there are potential safety hazards.</p><p><blockquote>本次召回范围内车辆由于主动巡航控制系统存在问题，在以下情况下驾驶员容易误激活主动巡航功能：当车辆挂入D挡时，驾驶员试图通过再次推动右侧操纵杆来切换挡位；车辆急转弯时，驾驶员误触并移动右侧操纵杆等。误启动主动巡航控制后，如果车辆设定的巡航速度不是当前速度，而当前速度低于设定速度，车辆就会加速到设定速度，导致车速突然升高，影响驾驶员的预期，导致车辆操控误判。极端情况下可能导致车辆碰撞，存在安全隐患。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla will upgrade the active cruise control software for the recalled vehicles free of charge through OTA technology, so users can complete the software upgrade without going to the store; For vehicles that cannot be recalled through OTA technology, Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. will contact relevant users through Tesla service center to upgrade active cruise control software for vehicles free, so as to eliminate potential safety hazards.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉将通过OTA技术为召回车辆免费升级主动巡航控制软件，用户无需到店即可完成软件升级；对于无法通过OTA技术召回的车辆，特斯拉（北京）有限公司和特斯拉（上海）有限公司将通过特斯拉服务中心联系相关用户，为车辆免费升级主动巡航控制软件，以消除安全隐患。</blockquote></p><p> In response to the recall, Tesla said on June 26 that for the vehicles (Model 3 / Model Y) within the scope of this recall, due to the fact that the active cruise control function may be activated by the driver by mistake, there are potential safety hazards in extreme cases. Tesla took the initiative to file the recall plan with the State Administration of market supervision and administration. Users do not need to go to the store to complete the OTA. Tesla said it apologized for the inconvenience caused by the recall.</p><p><blockquote>针对此次召回，特斯拉6月26日表示，本次召回范围内的车辆（Model 3/Model Y），由于主动巡航控制功能可能被驾驶员误激活，极端情况下存在安全隐患。特斯拉主动向国家市场监督管理总局备案了召回计划。用户无需前往门店即可完成OTA。特斯拉表示，对此次召回给您带来的不便表示歉意。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1132692662","content_text":"Recently, Tesla filed a recall plan and decided to recall some vehicles from now on,according to China's State Administration of market supervision.\nTesla decided to recall 35665 imported Model 3 produced between January 12, 2019 and November 27, 2019.\nMeanwhile, Tesla will recall some domestic Model 3 produced from December 19, 2019 to June 7, 2021, totaling 211256 vehicles; A total of 38599 domestic Model Y were produced from January 1, 2021 to June 7, 2021.\nDue to the problems of the active cruise control system of the vehicles within the scope of this recall, it is easy for the driver to activate the active cruise function by mistake in the following situations: when the vehicle is in D gear, the driver tries to switch the gear by pushing the right control lever again; When the vehicle turns sharply, the driver touches and moves the right control lever by mistake, etc. After the active cruise control is mistakenly activated, if the cruise speed set by the vehicle is not the current speed, and the current speed is lower than the set speed, the vehicle will accelerate to the set speed, resulting in a sudden increase in vehicle speed, which will affect the driver's expectation and lead to misjudgment of vehicle handling. In extreme cases, it may lead to vehicle collision, and there are potential safety hazards.\nTesla will upgrade the active cruise control software for the recalled vehicles free of charge through OTA technology, so users can complete the software upgrade without going to the store; For vehicles that cannot be recalled through OTA technology, Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. will contact relevant users through Tesla service center to upgrade active cruise control software for vehicles free, so as to eliminate potential safety hazards.\nIn response to the recall, Tesla said on June 26 that for the vehicles (Model 3 / Model Y) within the scope of this recall, due to the fact that the active cruise control function may be activated by the driver by mistake, there are potential safety hazards in extreme cases. Tesla took the initiative to file the recall plan with the State Administration of market supervision and administration. Users do not need to go to the store to complete the OTA. Tesla said it apologized for the inconvenience caused by the recall.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":328,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}