+关注
jummpy
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:未知
94
关注
1
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
jummpy
2021-08-13
Omg
Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-08-13
Late st
Lion Electric Q2 Revenue Climbs On Rising Vehicle Delivery<blockquote>Lion Electric 第二季度收入因车辆交付量增加而攀升</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-08-10
Planes
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-08-07
Take money
US IPO Week Ahead: 2 banks test the waters amid annual summer slowdown<blockquote>美国 IPO 未来一周:两家银行在一年一度的夏季放缓中试水</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-08-04
Tesla
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-08-04
Telsla
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-08-03
Good
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-08-01
Interesting.
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-07-31
Comment n like
It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金活动家的开放季节。基金持有人如何赢得和失败</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-07-31
Like
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-07-13
Ok
Toplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的顶线</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-07-11
Like
The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-07-11
Like pls
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-07-10
Good
China has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu<blockquote>中国禁止虎牙和斗鱼合并</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-07-07
Xpev
XPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价在盘前交易中下跌 3%。</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-07-06
Flat
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-07-06
IPO
US IPO This Week: Just 2 IPOs scheduled for the shortened holiday week<blockquote>本周美国 IPO:假期周缩短期间仅安排 2 次 IPO</blockquote>
jummpy
2021-07-05
Latest
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-07-03
Not all raised
抱歉,原内容已删除
jummpy
2021-06-30
Yes
抱歉,原内容已删除
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3585041206091097","uuid":"3585041206091097","gmtCreate":1621947181750,"gmtModify":1624528426429,"name":"jummpy","pinyin":"jummpy","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":94,"tweetSize":37,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖(非转发)","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.93%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":897066443,"gmtCreate":1628863559582,"gmtModify":1633688905745,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Omg","listText":"Omg","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897066443","repostId":"2159903472","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159903472","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628863309,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2159903472?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-13 22:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159903472","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE: XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:XL)周五股价走低,此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分,低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元,低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信,市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚,然而,供应链问题和关键材料(尤其是微芯片)的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业,严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为:</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元,最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时,该股下跌 6.90%,至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-13 22:01</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:XL)周五股价走低,此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分,低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元,低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信,市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚,然而,供应链问题和关键材料(尤其是微芯片)的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业,严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为:</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元,最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时,该股下跌 6.90%,至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159903472","content_text":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.\nXL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.\nWe believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said Dimitri Kazarinoff, CEO of XL Fleet.\nXL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.\nPrice Action: XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.\nAt last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3643,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897061926,"gmtCreate":1628863449965,"gmtModify":1633688907468,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Late st","listText":"Late st","text":"Late st","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897061926","repostId":"2159647290","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159647290","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628862921,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2159647290?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-13 21:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lion Electric Q2 Revenue Climbs On Rising Vehicle Delivery<blockquote>Lion Electric 第二季度收入因车辆交付量增加而攀升</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159647290","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"\n","content":"<p><ul> <li><b>Lion Electric Co </b>(NYSE:LEV) reported second-quarter revenue growth of 174% year-over-year to $16.69 million and delivered 61 vehicles compared to 22 same quarter last year.</li> <li>EPS was $(1.13) versus $(0.01) in 2Q20.</li> <li>The gross margin contracted by 1,187 bps to 5.4%, reflecting the impact of increased fixed manufacturing costs related to the ramp-up of production capacity for future quarters and the effect of the increase in the price of raw materials.</li> <li>The operating loss widened to $(76.09) million from $(0.96) million a year ago.</li> <li>Selling expenses increased to $13.3 million, compared to $0.86 million in Q2 2020, reflecting a significant increase in non-cash share-based compensation.</li> <li>Lion Electric's cash flows used in operating activities year-to-date was $50.72 million, compared to $8.4 million a year ago.</li> <li>Adjusted EBITDA loss was $(5.52) million, compared to $(0.118) million in 2Q20.</li> <li>Lion Electric had $364.3 million in cash as of June 30, 2021, with an additional borrowing capacity of up to $100 million added on August 11, 2021.</li> <li>Vehicle order book of 965 all-electric medium- and heavy-duty urban vehicles as of August 12, 2021, consisted of 262 trucks and 703 buses, the combined order value of over $280 million.</li> <li><b>Price Action:</b> LEV shares are trading lower by 0.49% at $14.3 on the last check Friday.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>狮子电气公司</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:LEV)公布第二季度收入同比增长 174%,达到 1669 万美元,交付了 61 辆汽车,而去年同期为 22 辆。</li><li>2020年第二季度的每股收益为 (1.13) 美元,而2020年第二季度为 (0.01) 美元。</li><li>毛利率收缩 1,187 个基点至 5.4%,反映了与未来几个季度产能增加相关的固定制造成本增加的影响以及原材料价格上涨的影响。</li><li>运营亏损从一年前的(96)万美元扩大至(7609)万美元。</li><li>销售费用增至 1,330 万美元,而 2020 年第二季度为 86 万美元,反映出非现金股份薪酬的显着增加。</li><li>Lion Electric 今年迄今用于经营活动的现金流为 5072 万美元,而去年同期为 840 万美元。</li><li>调整后 EBITDA 亏损为 (552) 万美元,而2020年第二季度为 (11.8) 万美元。</li><li>截至2021年6月30日,Lion Electric拥有3.643亿美元现金,2021年8月11日增加了高达1亿美元的额外借款能力。</li><li>截至2021年8月12日,965辆全电动中重型城市车辆的车辆订单簿包括262辆卡车和703辆公共汽车,订单总价值超过2.8亿美元。</li><li><b>价格行为:</b>周五最后一次检查时,LEV 股价下跌 0.49%,至 14.3 美元。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lion Electric Q2 Revenue Climbs On Rising Vehicle Delivery<blockquote>Lion Electric 第二季度收入因车辆交付量增加而攀升</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLion Electric Q2 Revenue Climbs On Rising Vehicle Delivery<blockquote>Lion Electric 第二季度收入因车辆交付量增加而攀升</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-13 21:55</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul> <li><b>Lion Electric Co </b>(NYSE:LEV) reported second-quarter revenue growth of 174% year-over-year to $16.69 million and delivered 61 vehicles compared to 22 same quarter last year.</li> <li>EPS was $(1.13) versus $(0.01) in 2Q20.</li> <li>The gross margin contracted by 1,187 bps to 5.4%, reflecting the impact of increased fixed manufacturing costs related to the ramp-up of production capacity for future quarters and the effect of the increase in the price of raw materials.</li> <li>The operating loss widened to $(76.09) million from $(0.96) million a year ago.</li> <li>Selling expenses increased to $13.3 million, compared to $0.86 million in Q2 2020, reflecting a significant increase in non-cash share-based compensation.</li> <li>Lion Electric's cash flows used in operating activities year-to-date was $50.72 million, compared to $8.4 million a year ago.</li> <li>Adjusted EBITDA loss was $(5.52) million, compared to $(0.118) million in 2Q20.</li> <li>Lion Electric had $364.3 million in cash as of June 30, 2021, with an additional borrowing capacity of up to $100 million added on August 11, 2021.</li> <li>Vehicle order book of 965 all-electric medium- and heavy-duty urban vehicles as of August 12, 2021, consisted of 262 trucks and 703 buses, the combined order value of over $280 million.</li> <li><b>Price Action:</b> LEV shares are trading lower by 0.49% at $14.3 on the last check Friday.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>狮子电气公司</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:LEV)公布第二季度收入同比增长 174%,达到 1669 万美元,交付了 61 辆汽车,而去年同期为 22 辆。</li><li>2020年第二季度的每股收益为 (1.13) 美元,而2020年第二季度为 (0.01) 美元。</li><li>毛利率收缩 1,187 个基点至 5.4%,反映了与未来几个季度产能增加相关的固定制造成本增加的影响以及原材料价格上涨的影响。</li><li>运营亏损从一年前的(96)万美元扩大至(7609)万美元。</li><li>销售费用增至 1,330 万美元,而 2020 年第二季度为 86 万美元,反映出非现金股份薪酬的显着增加。</li><li>Lion Electric 今年迄今用于经营活动的现金流为 5072 万美元,而去年同期为 840 万美元。</li><li>调整后 EBITDA 亏损为 (552) 万美元,而2020年第二季度为 (11.8) 万美元。</li><li>截至2021年6月30日,Lion Electric拥有3.643亿美元现金,2021年8月11日增加了高达1亿美元的额外借款能力。</li><li>截至2021年8月12日,965辆全电动中重型城市车辆的车辆订单簿包括262辆卡车和703辆公共汽车,订单总价值超过2.8亿美元。</li><li><b>价格行为:</b>周五最后一次检查时,LEV 股价下跌 0.49%,至 14.3 美元。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QTWO":"Q2 Holdings Inc"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159647290","content_text":"Lion Electric Co (NYSE:LEV) reported second-quarter revenue growth of 174% year-over-year to $16.69 million and delivered 61 vehicles compared to 22 same quarter last year.\nEPS was $(1.13) versus $(0.01) in 2Q20.\nThe gross margin contracted by 1,187 bps to 5.4%, reflecting the impact of increased fixed manufacturing costs related to the ramp-up of production capacity for future quarters and the effect of the increase in the price of raw materials.\nThe operating loss widened to $(76.09) million from $(0.96) million a year ago.\nSelling expenses increased to $13.3 million, compared to $0.86 million in Q2 2020, reflecting a significant increase in non-cash share-based compensation.\nLion Electric's cash flows used in operating activities year-to-date was $50.72 million, compared to $8.4 million a year ago.\nAdjusted EBITDA loss was $(5.52) million, compared to $(0.118) million in 2Q20.\nLion Electric had $364.3 million in cash as of June 30, 2021, with an additional borrowing capacity of up to $100 million added on August 11, 2021.\nVehicle order book of 965 all-electric medium- and heavy-duty urban vehicles as of August 12, 2021, consisted of 262 trucks and 703 buses, the combined order value of over $280 million.\nPrice Action: LEV shares are trading lower by 0.49% at $14.3 on the last check Friday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QTWO":0.9,"LEV":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2358,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892093356,"gmtCreate":1628608677675,"gmtModify":1633745742756,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Planes","listText":"Planes","text":"Planes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892093356","repostId":"2158772124","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3191,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891107808,"gmtCreate":1628344951204,"gmtModify":1633751544440,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Take money","listText":"Take money","text":"Take money","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891107808","repostId":"1157428986","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1157428986","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628296262,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1157428986?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-07 08:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO Week Ahead: 2 banks test the waters amid annual summer slowdown<blockquote>美国 IPO 未来一周:两家银行在一年一度的夏季放缓中试水</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1157428986","media":"renaissancecap...","summary":"The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks sch","content":"<p>The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks scheduled for the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>随着八月的平静期继续到来,IPO 市场正在得到喘息的机会,未来一周只有两家银行安排上市。</blockquote></p><p> Utah-based digital bank <b>FinWise Bancorp</b>(FINW) plans to raise $58 million at a $183 million market cap. FinWise Bank makes loans to and takes deposits from consumers and small businesses across the US. As of 3/31/21, FinWise Bancorp had total assets of $330 million, total loans of $245 million, total deposits of $189 million, and total shareholders’ equity of $52 million.</p><p><blockquote>犹他州数字银行<b>芬威斯银行</b>(FINW) 计划以 1.83 亿美元的市值筹集 5800 万美元。FinWise Bank向美国各地的消费者和小企业发放贷款并接受存款。截至 2021 年 3 月 31 日,FinWise Bancorp 的总资产为 3.3 亿美元,贷款总额为 2.45 亿美元,存款总额为 1.89 亿美元,股东权益总额为 5200 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> Alabama bank <b>Southern States Bancshares</b>(SSBK) plans to raise $40 million at a $174 million market cap. Southern States Bank is a full service community bank, serving businesses and individuals through 15 branches across Alabama and Georgia. As of 3/31/21, Southern States had total assets of $1.5 billion, total loans of $1.1 billion, total deposits of $1.3 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of $145 million.</p><p><blockquote>阿拉巴马银行<b>南方各州银行股票</b>(SSBK) 计划以 1.74 亿美元的市值筹集 4000 万美元。南方各州银行是一家提供全方位服务的社区银行,通过遍布阿拉巴马州和佐治亚州的15家分行为企业和个人提供服务。截至 2021 年 3 月 31 日,南方各州的总资产为 15 亿美元,贷款总额为 11 亿美元,存款总额为 13 亿美元,股东权益总额为 1.45 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8919c8c9b4257f3c84869f14fa89bcab\" tg-width=\"1414\" tg-height=\"356\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1619493174116","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO Week Ahead: 2 banks test the waters amid annual summer slowdown<blockquote>美国 IPO 未来一周:两家银行在一年一度的夏季放缓中试水</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO Week Ahead: 2 banks test the waters amid annual summer slowdown<blockquote>美国 IPO 未来一周:两家银行在一年一度的夏季放缓中试水</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">renaissancecap...</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-07 08:31</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks scheduled for the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>随着八月的平静期继续到来,IPO 市场正在得到喘息的机会,未来一周只有两家银行安排上市。</blockquote></p><p> Utah-based digital bank <b>FinWise Bancorp</b>(FINW) plans to raise $58 million at a $183 million market cap. FinWise Bank makes loans to and takes deposits from consumers and small businesses across the US. As of 3/31/21, FinWise Bancorp had total assets of $330 million, total loans of $245 million, total deposits of $189 million, and total shareholders’ equity of $52 million.</p><p><blockquote>犹他州数字银行<b>芬威斯银行</b>(FINW) 计划以 1.83 亿美元的市值筹集 5800 万美元。FinWise Bank向美国各地的消费者和小企业发放贷款并接受存款。截至 2021 年 3 月 31 日,FinWise Bancorp 的总资产为 3.3 亿美元,贷款总额为 2.45 亿美元,存款总额为 1.89 亿美元,股东权益总额为 5200 万美元。</blockquote></p><p> Alabama bank <b>Southern States Bancshares</b>(SSBK) plans to raise $40 million at a $174 million market cap. Southern States Bank is a full service community bank, serving businesses and individuals through 15 branches across Alabama and Georgia. As of 3/31/21, Southern States had total assets of $1.5 billion, total loans of $1.1 billion, total deposits of $1.3 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of $145 million.</p><p><blockquote>阿拉巴马银行<b>南方各州银行股票</b>(SSBK) 计划以 1.74 亿美元的市值筹集 4000 万美元。南方各州银行是一家提供全方位服务的社区银行,通过遍布阿拉巴马州和佐治亚州的15家分行为企业和个人提供服务。截至 2021 年 3 月 31 日,南方各州的总资产为 15 亿美元,贷款总额为 11 亿美元,存款总额为 13 亿美元,股东权益总额为 1.45 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8919c8c9b4257f3c84869f14fa89bcab\" tg-width=\"1414\" tg-height=\"356\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/85076/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-2-banks-test-the-waters-amid-annual-summer-slowdown\">renaissancecap...</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SSBK":"Southern States Bancshares, Inc.","FINW":"Finwise Bancorp"},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/85076/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-2-banks-test-the-waters-amid-annual-summer-slowdown","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1157428986","content_text":"The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks scheduled for the week ahead.\nUtah-based digital bank FinWise Bancorp(FINW) plans to raise $58 million at a $183 million market cap. FinWise Bank makes loans to and takes deposits from consumers and small businesses across the US. As of 3/31/21, FinWise Bancorp had total assets of $330 million, total loans of $245 million, total deposits of $189 million, and total shareholders’ equity of $52 million.\nAlabama bank Southern States Bancshares(SSBK) plans to raise $40 million at a $174 million market cap. Southern States Bank is a full service community bank, serving businesses and individuals through 15 branches across Alabama and Georgia. As of 3/31/21, Southern States had total assets of $1.5 billion, total loans of $1.1 billion, total deposits of $1.3 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of $145 million.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FINW":0.9,"SSBK":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807288039,"gmtCreate":1628038999121,"gmtModify":1633754175790,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tesla","listText":"Tesla","text":"Tesla","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807288039","repostId":"1141615218","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3969,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807281990,"gmtCreate":1628038960210,"gmtModify":1633754176479,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Telsla","listText":"Telsla","text":"Telsla","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807281990","repostId":"1141615218","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3794,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807939900,"gmtCreate":1627994898200,"gmtModify":1633754570550,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807939900","repostId":"2156147918","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802765625,"gmtCreate":1627809952367,"gmtModify":1633756191989,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Interesting.","listText":"Interesting.","text":"Interesting.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802765625","repostId":"1136794908","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2312,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806794845,"gmtCreate":1627692872087,"gmtModify":1633757112285,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Comment n like","listText":"Comment n like","text":"Comment n like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806794845","repostId":"1138566016","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138566016","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627689251,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1138566016?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金活动家的开放季节。基金持有人如何赢得和失败</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138566016","media":"Barron's","summary":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasensta","content":"<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>邓普顿全球收益基金多年来一直让投资者感到沮丧。尽管明星经理迈克尔·哈森斯塔布 (Michael Hasenstab) 掌舵,但该封闭式基金在过去十年中的平均年回报率为 0.3%,而全球同行的平均年回报率为 7%。同样令人沮丧的是,该基金的股票交易很少接近基金的标的资产净值(NAV)。过去三年平均折扣为11%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.</p><p><blockquote>然而,多亏了激进投资者博阿兹·韦恩斯坦 (Boaz Weinstein) 经营的对冲基金公司 Saba Capital Management,投资者才得以突破。萨巴持有邓普顿基金 20% 的股份,最近赢得了四个有争议的董事会席位。它一直在向董事会施压,要求其采取行动提高股价。其举措取得了成效:随着股价上涨,该基金今年的总回报率为 4.5%,资产净值折扣已缩小至 4%。</blockquote></p><p> Tactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.</p><p><blockquote>像萨巴这样的策略长期以来一直激怒着共同基金公司;没有人希望对冲基金发动政变。现在,由于众议院最近提出的一项法案,在国会的帮助下,竞争环境可能会向封闭式基金及其公司赞助商倾斜。这可能会损害基金投资者的利益。</blockquote></p><p> The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.</p><p><blockquote>众议员安东尼·冈萨雷斯(俄亥俄州共和党)和众议员格雷戈里·米克斯(纽约州民主党)于6月提出的《增加投资者机会法案》包括两项措施,可能会使对冲基金更难向封闭式基金施压并赢得代理权之争。一项拟议的改变将取消目前对风险投资和私募股权基金等非流动性私募基金的封闭式基金所有权15%的限制。第二项措施将阻止激进对冲基金收购封闭式基金 10% 以上的股份。</blockquote></p><p> A spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>冈萨雷斯的发言人拒绝置评。米克斯没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Proponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.</p><p><blockquote>这些变化的支持者表示,他们将扩大散户投资者进入私人市场的机会。他们还表示,对冲基金正在利用证券法的漏洞,以牺牲长期股东的利益为代价,让他们背负纳税义务、更高的费用和强制基金清算。投资公司协会(ICI)在最近的一份声明中说,该法案将消除 “激进投资者以散户投资者为代价获取短期利润的漏洞”。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.</p><p><blockquote>投资于封闭式基金的对冲基金和投资组合经理表示,共同基金公司只是试图保护资产池和费用免受股东干预。大多数散户投资者不会在代理权竞争中投票。这可能会让基金董事会在很大程度上自由地追求自己的议程。</blockquote></p><p> “Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.</p><p><blockquote>“激进主义发挥着重要作用,如果这项法案获得通过,激进分子将更难威胁或创造变革,”激进主义对冲基金德莱顿资本(Dryden Capital)的投资组合经理马特-巴芬顿(Matt Buffington)说。</blockquote></p><p> Gregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的咨询公司 Relative Value Partners 的投资组合经理 Gregory Neer 对此表示同意。“他说:”投资者向资金施压的能力对所有股东都有好处。</blockquote></p><p> Closed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.</p><p><blockquote>封闭式基金因其收益率高、分布稳定等特点,长期以来备受投资者欢迎。许多人使用杠杆,以市场利率借钱来增加支出。他们还通过期权策略以及对股票和债券市场高收益领域的投资产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> But the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.</p><p><blockquote>但这些基金存在结构性缺陷。根据晨星直接的数据,费用率很高,平均为 2.1%。由于这些基金拥有固定数量的流通股,价格反映了市场对基金及其标的资产的需求。基金的交易价格通常低于资产净值。虽然从理论上讲,为一美元的资产支付90美分是有吸引力的,但投资者可能永远不会看到额外的一毛钱。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金旨在利用这种低效率,以低于市场价值的价格购买封闭式基金。然后,他们向基金董事会施压,要求其采取措施提高基金价格。策略很简单:积累股份,赢得董事会席位,然后迫使基金公司提出要约收购,同意以接近全价回购股票。</blockquote></p><p> If that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.</p><p><blockquote>如果失败,对冲基金可能会尝试更换基金经理、安排基金清算,或者将其转换为开放式基金--这些举措也可能在股价上涨至与资产净值持平的情况下获得回报。像Saba这样的公司也完全接管了基金。</blockquote></p><p> Giving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tells<i>Barron’s</i>.</p><p><blockquote>给予封闭式基金持有更多私人证券的自由可能会给该战略带来麻烦。只有当基金能够以市场价格清算其大部分持有的股份时,要约收购才有效。由于风险投资和私募股权通常不公开交易,因此它们的定价并不透明。“一位激进主义经理说:”当封闭式基金投资于非流动性资产时,就能保护它们免受激进主义的影响。<i>巴伦</i>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Removing the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.</p><p><blockquote>共同基金行业律师托马斯-德卡波(Thomas DeCapo)说,取消私募基金所有权上限 “符合让散户投资者有更多机会获得私人投资的立法议程”。</blockquote></p><p> And capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”</p><p><blockquote>将激进分子的份额限制在基金的 10% 并不能阻止他们发起代理人运动。“他说:”这一切都不反民主。“这并不能阻止大多数不满意或希望改变的投资者。它阻止了一个投资者利用自己的经济权力,用别人的钱,基本上迫使其他人做出改变”。</blockquote></p><p> Investor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.</p><p><blockquote>然而,投资者倡导者有不同的看法,他们表示,基金投资者最终可能会为持有更不透明投资的基金支付更高的费用。“投资者保护组织 Healthy Markets 的负责人泰勒-格拉施(Tyler Gellasch)说:”这只是另一个基金中的基金结构,而且这些基金的费用是出了名的高。</blockquote></p><p> Individual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.</p><p><blockquote>根据 1940 年《投资公司法》(Investment Company Act)的所有权限制,从技术上讲,单个对冲基金持有的封闭式基金不得超过 3%。但他们通过附属实体建立股份来规避规则,创造足够的临界质量,通过代理投票迫使基金发生变化。</blockquote></p><p> The ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.</p><p><blockquote>ICI--共同基金行业的游说团体--试图说服监管机构打击对冲基金。在去年提交给美国证券交易委员会的一份文件中,ICI 认为对冲基金活动往往会消耗基金的资源,引发长期投资者的纳税义务,并导致被迫出售证券以满足对冲基金的要约收购要求。如果基金被迫回购股票,而其资产基础缩水,那么基金的费用率可能会上升。</blockquote></p><p> The activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.</p><p><blockquote>ICI 表示,激进社区对行业的 “攻击 ”对产品发布产生了寒蝉效应,导致目前市场上的封闭式基金数量少于 2007 年。</blockquote></p><p> But hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”</p><p><blockquote>但对冲基金认为,修改 1940 年法案将相当于共同基金的权力攫取。“斗牛犬投资者公司(Bulldog Investors)的联合创始人菲尔-戈尔茨坦(Phil Goldstein)说:”这一切都来自共同基金行业,这保护了他们绝非巧合。“有些基金业绩糟糕,折扣幅度很大。ICI 从未说过我们需要一种机制,让股东追究这些经理的责任。”</blockquote></p><p> Imposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”</p><p><blockquote>施加所有权上限也会降低代理人竞选活动的经济性。如果被限制在 10%,对冲基金就不会拥有足够的股份,也不会有足够的经济利益来证明代理权争夺的费用是合理的,而代理权争夺可能会花费数百万美元。“戈尔茨坦说:”如果你被限制在 10%,却不得不将 2.5% 的资产用于代理竞选活动,你会说这太冒险了。“与此同时,管理层什么都不花--只是股东的钱。他们想让代理权竞争在经济上变得没有吸引力”。</blockquote></p><p> Regulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>监管机构和法院对封闭式基金为防止股东挑战而采取的一些辩护措施表示怀疑。而且,美国证券交易委员会可能不会站在基金业一边。自2010年以来,美国证券交易委员会一直警告基金公司不要利用州证券法阻挠对冲基金收购。去年,在共和党主席杰伊-克莱顿(Jay Clayton)的领导下,美国证券交易委员会放弃了对这些州 “控制份额 ”法律的反对。但民主党新任主席加里-根斯勒(Gary Gensler)可能会恢复美国证券交易委员会的反对意见--这也是该行业争取国会修改法律的理由。美国证券交易委员会没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Institutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”</p><p><blockquote>机构股东服务公司(Institutional Shareholder Services)是一家就代理投票提出建议的公司,该公司表示,投资者应拒绝基金公司利用限制股东投票权的州控股法。ISS 表示,由于美国证券交易委员会(SEC)置身事外,“CEF 股东被剥夺了重要的投票权,并受到管理层的巩固”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70323ed9daef142f19afd48be72b6299\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68beb47d59eb02e90b04eb7093f9f17b\" tg-width=\"759\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Hedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金并不总是能赢,但投资者可能希望在激进分子入股时顺风顺水。“南卡罗来纳大学金融学副教授马特-索瑟(Matt Souther)说:”当激进分子进来时,你通常会看到股价上涨,折扣减少。</blockquote></p><p> Templeton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>如果 Saba 收购更多股份或试图接管该基金 7.43 亿美元的资产,邓普顿全球收入公司(股票代码:GIM)对资产净值的折扣可能会进一步缩小。Saba 最近接管了另一只基金 Voya Prime Rate Trust 的管理权,并将其更名为 Saba Capital Income & Opportunities (BRW)。富兰克林邓普顿和 Saba 拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.</p><p><blockquote>Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE)也是 Saba 的目标。该基金是一个 “定期信托”,规定清算日期为 2024 年。其交易价格较资产净值折扣 5.9%。“拥有 HIE 的封闭式基金 FriverNorth Opportunities(RIV)的联席经理帕特里克-加利(Patrick Galley)说:”在最坏的情况下,你会以折扣价买入,从现在到 2024 年,你将获得超额回报,因为折扣价会缩小。</blockquote></p><p> Other closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).</p><p><blockquote>Saba 持有股份的其他封闭式基金包括 Source Capital (SOR) 和 Vesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities (VTA)。Bulldog 已经在 inTortoise Energy Independence (NDP) 建立了自己的地位。</blockquote></p><p> Some closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.</p><p><blockquote>一些封闭式基金的基本面看起来很有吸引力。 Adams Diversified Equity (ADX) 提供大型科技股的投资,交易价格较资产净值折扣 14%,并承诺年化分配至少为 6%。“旧金山封闭式投资者、泰珀资本管理公司(Tepper Capital Management)负责人大卫-泰珀(David Tepper)说:”对于期望科技股表现良好的投资者来说,ADX 是一个不错的持股选择。</blockquote></p><p> Sprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.</p><p><blockquote>Sprott Focus Trust(基金)是他喜欢的另一只基金。资深小盘股经理惠特尼·乔治 (Whitney George) 经营该公司,他的家族拥有 45% 的股份。它的交易折扣为 10%,收益率为 5.7%。泰珀还青睐罗伊斯全球价值信托 (RGT),其交易折扣为 9%,收益率为 7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> None of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.</p><p><blockquote>根据证券文件,这些基金都没有吸引太多活动人士的参与。但是,如果激进分子看到了机会,他们可能会蜂拥而至,向基金管理部门施压--前提是国会不改写交战规则。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金活动家的开放季节。基金持有人如何赢得和失败</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金活动家的开放季节。基金持有人如何赢得和失败</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barron's</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 07:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>邓普顿全球收益基金多年来一直让投资者感到沮丧。尽管明星经理迈克尔·哈森斯塔布 (Michael Hasenstab) 掌舵,但该封闭式基金在过去十年中的平均年回报率为 0.3%,而全球同行的平均年回报率为 7%。同样令人沮丧的是,该基金的股票交易很少接近基金的标的资产净值(NAV)。过去三年平均折扣为11%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.</p><p><blockquote>然而,多亏了激进投资者博阿兹·韦恩斯坦 (Boaz Weinstein) 经营的对冲基金公司 Saba Capital Management,投资者才得以突破。萨巴持有邓普顿基金 20% 的股份,最近赢得了四个有争议的董事会席位。它一直在向董事会施压,要求其采取行动提高股价。其举措取得了成效:随着股价上涨,该基金今年的总回报率为 4.5%,资产净值折扣已缩小至 4%。</blockquote></p><p> Tactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.</p><p><blockquote>像萨巴这样的策略长期以来一直激怒着共同基金公司;没有人希望对冲基金发动政变。现在,由于众议院最近提出的一项法案,在国会的帮助下,竞争环境可能会向封闭式基金及其公司赞助商倾斜。这可能会损害基金投资者的利益。</blockquote></p><p> The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.</p><p><blockquote>众议员安东尼·冈萨雷斯(俄亥俄州共和党)和众议员格雷戈里·米克斯(纽约州民主党)于6月提出的《增加投资者机会法案》包括两项措施,可能会使对冲基金更难向封闭式基金施压并赢得代理权之争。一项拟议的改变将取消目前对风险投资和私募股权基金等非流动性私募基金的封闭式基金所有权15%的限制。第二项措施将阻止激进对冲基金收购封闭式基金 10% 以上的股份。</blockquote></p><p> A spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>冈萨雷斯的发言人拒绝置评。米克斯没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Proponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.</p><p><blockquote>这些变化的支持者表示,他们将扩大散户投资者进入私人市场的机会。他们还表示,对冲基金正在利用证券法的漏洞,以牺牲长期股东的利益为代价,让他们背负纳税义务、更高的费用和强制基金清算。投资公司协会(ICI)在最近的一份声明中说,该法案将消除 “激进投资者以散户投资者为代价获取短期利润的漏洞”。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.</p><p><blockquote>投资于封闭式基金的对冲基金和投资组合经理表示,共同基金公司只是试图保护资产池和费用免受股东干预。大多数散户投资者不会在代理权竞争中投票。这可能会让基金董事会在很大程度上自由地追求自己的议程。</blockquote></p><p> “Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.</p><p><blockquote>“激进主义发挥着重要作用,如果这项法案获得通过,激进分子将更难威胁或创造变革,”激进主义对冲基金德莱顿资本(Dryden Capital)的投资组合经理马特-巴芬顿(Matt Buffington)说。</blockquote></p><p> Gregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的咨询公司 Relative Value Partners 的投资组合经理 Gregory Neer 对此表示同意。“他说:”投资者向资金施压的能力对所有股东都有好处。</blockquote></p><p> Closed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.</p><p><blockquote>封闭式基金因其收益率高、分布稳定等特点,长期以来备受投资者欢迎。许多人使用杠杆,以市场利率借钱来增加支出。他们还通过期权策略以及对股票和债券市场高收益领域的投资产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> But the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.</p><p><blockquote>但这些基金存在结构性缺陷。根据晨星直接的数据,费用率很高,平均为 2.1%。由于这些基金拥有固定数量的流通股,价格反映了市场对基金及其标的资产的需求。基金的交易价格通常低于资产净值。虽然从理论上讲,为一美元的资产支付90美分是有吸引力的,但投资者可能永远不会看到额外的一毛钱。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金旨在利用这种低效率,以低于市场价值的价格购买封闭式基金。然后,他们向基金董事会施压,要求其采取措施提高基金价格。策略很简单:积累股份,赢得董事会席位,然后迫使基金公司提出要约收购,同意以接近全价回购股票。</blockquote></p><p> If that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.</p><p><blockquote>如果失败,对冲基金可能会尝试更换基金经理、安排基金清算,或者将其转换为开放式基金--这些举措也可能在股价上涨至与资产净值持平的情况下获得回报。像Saba这样的公司也完全接管了基金。</blockquote></p><p> Giving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tells<i>Barron’s</i>.</p><p><blockquote>给予封闭式基金持有更多私人证券的自由可能会给该战略带来麻烦。只有当基金能够以市场价格清算其大部分持有的股份时,要约收购才有效。由于风险投资和私募股权通常不公开交易,因此它们的定价并不透明。“一位激进主义经理说:”当封闭式基金投资于非流动性资产时,就能保护它们免受激进主义的影响。<i>巴伦</i>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Removing the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.</p><p><blockquote>共同基金行业律师托马斯-德卡波(Thomas DeCapo)说,取消私募基金所有权上限 “符合让散户投资者有更多机会获得私人投资的立法议程”。</blockquote></p><p> And capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”</p><p><blockquote>将激进分子的份额限制在基金的 10% 并不能阻止他们发起代理人运动。“他说:”这一切都不反民主。“这并不能阻止大多数不满意或希望改变的投资者。它阻止了一个投资者利用自己的经济权力,用别人的钱,基本上迫使其他人做出改变”。</blockquote></p><p> Investor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.</p><p><blockquote>然而,投资者倡导者有不同的看法,他们表示,基金投资者最终可能会为持有更不透明投资的基金支付更高的费用。“投资者保护组织 Healthy Markets 的负责人泰勒-格拉施(Tyler Gellasch)说:”这只是另一个基金中的基金结构,而且这些基金的费用是出了名的高。</blockquote></p><p> Individual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.</p><p><blockquote>根据 1940 年《投资公司法》(Investment Company Act)的所有权限制,从技术上讲,单个对冲基金持有的封闭式基金不得超过 3%。但他们通过附属实体建立股份来规避规则,创造足够的临界质量,通过代理投票迫使基金发生变化。</blockquote></p><p> The ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.</p><p><blockquote>ICI--共同基金行业的游说团体--试图说服监管机构打击对冲基金。在去年提交给美国证券交易委员会的一份文件中,ICI 认为对冲基金活动往往会消耗基金的资源,引发长期投资者的纳税义务,并导致被迫出售证券以满足对冲基金的要约收购要求。如果基金被迫回购股票,而其资产基础缩水,那么基金的费用率可能会上升。</blockquote></p><p> The activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.</p><p><blockquote>ICI 表示,激进社区对行业的 “攻击 ”对产品发布产生了寒蝉效应,导致目前市场上的封闭式基金数量少于 2007 年。</blockquote></p><p> But hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”</p><p><blockquote>但对冲基金认为,修改 1940 年法案将相当于共同基金的权力攫取。“斗牛犬投资者公司(Bulldog Investors)的联合创始人菲尔-戈尔茨坦(Phil Goldstein)说:”这一切都来自共同基金行业,这保护了他们绝非巧合。“有些基金业绩糟糕,折扣幅度很大。ICI 从未说过我们需要一种机制,让股东追究这些经理的责任。”</blockquote></p><p> Imposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”</p><p><blockquote>施加所有权上限也会降低代理人竞选活动的经济性。如果被限制在 10%,对冲基金就不会拥有足够的股份,也不会有足够的经济利益来证明代理权争夺的费用是合理的,而代理权争夺可能会花费数百万美元。“戈尔茨坦说:”如果你被限制在 10%,却不得不将 2.5% 的资产用于代理竞选活动,你会说这太冒险了。“与此同时,管理层什么都不花--只是股东的钱。他们想让代理权竞争在经济上变得没有吸引力”。</blockquote></p><p> Regulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>监管机构和法院对封闭式基金为防止股东挑战而采取的一些辩护措施表示怀疑。而且,美国证券交易委员会可能不会站在基金业一边。自2010年以来,美国证券交易委员会一直警告基金公司不要利用州证券法阻挠对冲基金收购。去年,在共和党主席杰伊-克莱顿(Jay Clayton)的领导下,美国证券交易委员会放弃了对这些州 “控制份额 ”法律的反对。但民主党新任主席加里-根斯勒(Gary Gensler)可能会恢复美国证券交易委员会的反对意见--这也是该行业争取国会修改法律的理由。美国证券交易委员会没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Institutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”</p><p><blockquote>机构股东服务公司(Institutional Shareholder Services)是一家就代理投票提出建议的公司,该公司表示,投资者应拒绝基金公司利用限制股东投票权的州控股法。ISS 表示,由于美国证券交易委员会(SEC)置身事外,“CEF 股东被剥夺了重要的投票权,并受到管理层的巩固”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70323ed9daef142f19afd48be72b6299\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68beb47d59eb02e90b04eb7093f9f17b\" tg-width=\"759\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Hedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金并不总是能赢,但投资者可能希望在激进分子入股时顺风顺水。“南卡罗来纳大学金融学副教授马特-索瑟(Matt Souther)说:”当激进分子进来时,你通常会看到股价上涨,折扣减少。</blockquote></p><p> Templeton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>如果 Saba 收购更多股份或试图接管该基金 7.43 亿美元的资产,邓普顿全球收入公司(股票代码:GIM)对资产净值的折扣可能会进一步缩小。Saba 最近接管了另一只基金 Voya Prime Rate Trust 的管理权,并将其更名为 Saba Capital Income & Opportunities (BRW)。富兰克林邓普顿和 Saba 拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.</p><p><blockquote>Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE)也是 Saba 的目标。该基金是一个 “定期信托”,规定清算日期为 2024 年。其交易价格较资产净值折扣 5.9%。“拥有 HIE 的封闭式基金 FriverNorth Opportunities(RIV)的联席经理帕特里克-加利(Patrick Galley)说:”在最坏的情况下,你会以折扣价买入,从现在到 2024 年,你将获得超额回报,因为折扣价会缩小。</blockquote></p><p> Other closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).</p><p><blockquote>Saba 持有股份的其他封闭式基金包括 Source Capital (SOR) 和 Vesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities (VTA)。Bulldog 已经在 inTortoise Energy Independence (NDP) 建立了自己的地位。</blockquote></p><p> Some closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.</p><p><blockquote>一些封闭式基金的基本面看起来很有吸引力。 Adams Diversified Equity (ADX) 提供大型科技股的投资,交易价格较资产净值折扣 14%,并承诺年化分配至少为 6%。“旧金山封闭式投资者、泰珀资本管理公司(Tepper Capital Management)负责人大卫-泰珀(David Tepper)说:”对于期望科技股表现良好的投资者来说,ADX 是一个不错的持股选择。</blockquote></p><p> Sprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.</p><p><blockquote>Sprott Focus Trust(基金)是他喜欢的另一只基金。资深小盘股经理惠特尼·乔治 (Whitney George) 经营该公司,他的家族拥有 45% 的股份。它的交易折扣为 10%,收益率为 5.7%。泰珀还青睐罗伊斯全球价值信托 (RGT),其交易折扣为 9%,收益率为 7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> None of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.</p><p><blockquote>根据证券文件,这些基金都没有吸引太多活动人士的参与。但是,如果激进分子看到了机会,他们可能会蜂拥而至,向基金管理部门施压--前提是国会不改写交战规则。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click\">Barron's</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138566016","content_text":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.\nInvestors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.\nTactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.\nThe Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.\nA spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nProponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.\nHedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.\n“Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.\nGregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.\nClosed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.\nBut the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.\nHedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.\nIf that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.\nGiving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tellsBarron’s.\nRemoving the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.\nAnd capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”\nInvestor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.\nIndividual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.\nThe ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.\nThe activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.\nBut hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”\nImposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”\nRegulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nInstitutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”\nHedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.\nTempleton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.\nMiller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.\nOther closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).\nSome closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.\nSprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.\nNone of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4160,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806795306,"gmtCreate":1627692832505,"gmtModify":1633757113173,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806795306","repostId":"2155001152","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3841,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142741216,"gmtCreate":1626180084435,"gmtModify":1633929368518,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/142741216","repostId":"1123282588","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123282588","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626178321,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1123282588?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-13 20:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的顶线</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123282588","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock index futures traded mixed on Tuesday, as investors awaited earnings updates from big ban","content":"<p>U.S. stock index futures traded mixed on Tuesday, as investors awaited earnings updates from big banks and a reading on inflation data for early clues on the health of the domestic economy.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周二涨跌互现,投资者等待大银行的盈利更新和通胀数据的解读,以获取国内经济健康状况的早期线索。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:05 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 20 points, or 0.06%, S&P 500 E-minis were up 0.75 points, or 0.02% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 48.25 points, or 0.32%.</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间上午 8:05,道琼斯电子迷你指数下跌 20 点,即 0.06%,标普500电子迷你指数上涨 0.75 点,即 0.02%,纳斯达克 100 电子迷你指数上涨 48.25 点,即 0.32%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e03d386bbac30d7f14a49a7c920849b\" tg-width=\"801\" tg-height=\"251\"><span>*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 08:05</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>*资料来源:Tiger Trade,美国东部时间 08:05</span></p></blockquote></p><p> June-quarter earnings per share for S&P 500 companies is expected to rise 66%, according to Refinitiv data, with market participants questioning how long Wall Street's rally would last after a nearly 17% rise in the benchmark index so far this year.</p><p><blockquote>路孚特数据显示,标普500公司 6 月季度每股收益预计将增长 66%,市场参与者质疑,在今年迄今为止基准指数上涨近 17% 之后,华尔街的涨势将持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> Consumer price index data is due at 08:30 a.m. ET and is expected to ease in June after jumping 5% on a year-over-year basis in May.</p><p><blockquote>消费者价格指数数据将于美国东部时间上午 08:30 公布,预计在 5 月份同比上涨 5% 后,6 月份将有所放缓。</blockquote></p><p> Inflation and positive economic data have dictated Wall Street's movement since mid June as investors fear an overheating economy amid faster reopening could force the Federal Reserve to pare back its ultra-loose monetary policies sooner-than expected.</p><p><blockquote>自 6 月中旬以来,通胀和积极的经济数据决定了华尔街的走势,因为投资者担心,随着快速重新开放,经济过热可能会迫使美联储比预期更早削减超宽松货币政策。</blockquote></p><p> \"The broad markets are settling back and awaiting US inflation, US bank earnings... We view the environment as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of gestation as earnings comes in before the risk taking trend starts again, though a higher inflation print could create a temporary setback,\" said Sebastien Galy, senior macro strategist at Nordea Asset Management.</p><p><blockquote>“大盘正在稳定下来,等待美国通胀、美国银行盈利……我们认为环境<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>Nordea Asset Management 高级宏观策略师塞巴斯蒂安·加利 (Sebastien Galy) 表示:“尽管较高的通胀数据可能会造成暂时的挫折,但随着盈利在冒险趋势再次开始之前到来。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票:</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PEP\">Pepsi</a></b> – The snack and beverage giant gained 1.3% in premarket trading, after beating estimates on the top and bottom lines and raising its full-year forecast. PepsiCo earned an adjusted $1.72 per share for the quarter, 19 cents above estimates, helped by increasing North American beverage sales.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PEP\">百事可乐</a></b>– 这家零食和饮料巨头在盘前交易中上涨 1.3%,营收和利润均超出预期,并上调了全年预测。得益于北美饮料销量的增长,百事公司本季度调整后每股收益为 1.72 美元,比预期高出 19 美分。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a></b> – The bank reported a quarterly profit of $3.78 per share for the second quarter, beating the $3.21 consensus estimate, with revenue also topping Street forecasts. Results got a boost from an increase in investment banking fees, but the stock fell 1.3% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">摩根大通</a></b>– 该银行公布第二季度每股季度利润为 3.78 美元,超过市场普遍预期的 3.21 美元,收入也超出了华尔街的预期。投资银行费用的增加提振了业绩,但该股在盘前交易中下跌了 1.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BA\">Boeing</a></b> – Boeing shares fell 2.2% in the premarket, after saying it would cut the production rate for its 787 Dreamliner to deal with a new production-related issue. It now expects to deliver fewer than half of the roughly 100 787s in inventory this year, instead of the \"vast majority\" it had previously predicted.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BA\">波音</a></b>– 波音股价在盘前下跌 2.2%,此前该公司表示将削减 787 梦想客机的生产率,以应对新的生产相关问题。该公司现在预计今年交付的库存中大约 100 架 787 飞机不到一半,而不是之前预测的“绝大多数”。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a></b> – Goldman reported a second-quarter profit of $15.02 per share, beating the $10.24 consensus estimate, while revenue also exceeded Wall Street forecasts. Goldman's bottom line was helped by a surge in global deal fees.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">高盛</a></b>– 高盛公布第二季度每股利润为 15.02 美元,超出市场普遍预期的 10.24 美元,同时收入也超出了华尔街的预期。高盛的利润得益于全球交易费用的激增。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAG\">ConAgra</a></b> – The food producer beat estimates by 2 cents with adjusted quarterly earnings of 54 cents per share, with revenue topping analyst predictions as well. Conagra did cut its fiscal 2022 full-year forecast due to the impact of inflation, and its stock fell 3.7% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAG\">康尼格拉</a></b>– 这家食品生产商的调整后季度收益为每股 54 美分,超出预期 2 美分,收入也超出了分析师的预期。由于通胀影响,康尼格拉确实下调了 2022 财年全年预测,其股价在盘前交易中下跌了 3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">Nokia Oyj</a></b> – Nokia said it would announce an improved outlook for the year on July 29, when it reports its second-quarter results. The telecom equipment maker cites a pickup in business during the quarter. Shares surged 8.4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">诺基亚</a></b>– 诺基亚表示,将于 7 月 29 日公布第二季度业绩时公布改善后的今年前景。这家电信设备制造商表示,本季度业务有所回升。股价在盘前交易中飙升 8.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBI\">Hanesbrands</a> </b>– The stock jumped 3.2% in the premarket after Wells Fargo upgraded the apparel producer to \"overweight\" from \"equal weight\". Wells Fargo said it was impressed by the company's new leadership team and the overall direction of the business.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBI\">哈内斯品牌</a></b>– 富国银行将这家服装生产商的评级从“同等权重”上调至“跑赢大盘”后,该股在盘前上涨 3.2%。富国银行表示,该公司新的领导团队和业务的整体方向给它留下了深刻的印象。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> </b> – Disney is raising subscription prices for its ESPN+ sports streaming platform. The monthly price goes up by $1 to $6.99, while the annual plan will increase by $10 to $69.99.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">华特·迪士尼</a></b>– 迪士尼正在提高其 ESPN+ 体育流媒体平台的订阅价格。每月价格上涨1美元至6.99美元,而年度计划将上涨10美元至69.99美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">Johnson & Johnson</a></b> – The FDA is adding a warning label to Johnson & Johnson's Covid-19 vaccine, to warn of a very small incidence of the rare neurological disorder known as Guillain-Barre syndrome. Johnson & Johnson fell 1% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">强生公司</a></b>– FDA 正在为强生公司的 Covid-19 疫苗添加警告标签,以警告格林-巴利综合征这种罕见神经系统疾病的发病率非常低。强生公司盘前下跌 1%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIIB\">Biogen</a></b> – The U.S. government has begun the review process that will determine if Medicare will cover the cost of Biogen's newly approved Alzheimer's drug Aduhelm. A final decision is expected within 9 months.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIIB\">百健</a></b>– 美国政府已开始审查程序,以确定医疗保险是否会支付百健新批准的阿尔茨海默氏症药物 Aduhelm 的费用。最终决定预计将在9个月内做出。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a></b> – McDonald's is backing franchisee efforts to attract more workers, making a multimillion investment in perks such as higher pay, more paid time off, college tuition aid and emergency child care.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">麦当劳</a></b>– 麦当劳支持特许经营商吸引更多工人的努力,投资数百万美元用于福利,如更高的工资、更多的带薪休假、大学学费援助和紧急儿童保育。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的顶线</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的顶线</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-13 20:12</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. stock index futures traded mixed on Tuesday, as investors awaited earnings updates from big banks and a reading on inflation data for early clues on the health of the domestic economy.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周二涨跌互现,投资者等待大银行的盈利更新和通胀数据的解读,以获取国内经济健康状况的早期线索。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:05 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 20 points, or 0.06%, S&P 500 E-minis were up 0.75 points, or 0.02% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 48.25 points, or 0.32%.</p><p><blockquote>美国东部时间上午 8:05,道琼斯电子迷你指数下跌 20 点,即 0.06%,标普500电子迷你指数上涨 0.75 点,即 0.02%,纳斯达克 100 电子迷你指数上涨 48.25 点,即 0.32%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e03d386bbac30d7f14a49a7c920849b\" tg-width=\"801\" tg-height=\"251\"><span>*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 08:05</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>*资料来源:Tiger Trade,美国东部时间 08:05</span></p></blockquote></p><p> June-quarter earnings per share for S&P 500 companies is expected to rise 66%, according to Refinitiv data, with market participants questioning how long Wall Street's rally would last after a nearly 17% rise in the benchmark index so far this year.</p><p><blockquote>路孚特数据显示,标普500公司 6 月季度每股收益预计将增长 66%,市场参与者质疑,在今年迄今为止基准指数上涨近 17% 之后,华尔街的涨势将持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> Consumer price index data is due at 08:30 a.m. ET and is expected to ease in June after jumping 5% on a year-over-year basis in May.</p><p><blockquote>消费者价格指数数据将于美国东部时间上午 08:30 公布,预计在 5 月份同比上涨 5% 后,6 月份将有所放缓。</blockquote></p><p> Inflation and positive economic data have dictated Wall Street's movement since mid June as investors fear an overheating economy amid faster reopening could force the Federal Reserve to pare back its ultra-loose monetary policies sooner-than expected.</p><p><blockquote>自 6 月中旬以来,通胀和积极的经济数据决定了华尔街的走势,因为投资者担心,随着快速重新开放,经济过热可能会迫使美联储比预期更早削减超宽松货币政策。</blockquote></p><p> \"The broad markets are settling back and awaiting US inflation, US bank earnings... We view the environment as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of gestation as earnings comes in before the risk taking trend starts again, though a higher inflation print could create a temporary setback,\" said Sebastien Galy, senior macro strategist at Nordea Asset Management.</p><p><blockquote>“大盘正在稳定下来,等待美国通胀、美国银行盈利……我们认为环境<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>Nordea Asset Management 高级宏观策略师塞巴斯蒂安·加利 (Sebastien Galy) 表示:“尽管较高的通胀数据可能会造成暂时的挫折,但随着盈利在冒险趋势再次开始之前到来。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票:</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PEP\">Pepsi</a></b> – The snack and beverage giant gained 1.3% in premarket trading, after beating estimates on the top and bottom lines and raising its full-year forecast. PepsiCo earned an adjusted $1.72 per share for the quarter, 19 cents above estimates, helped by increasing North American beverage sales.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PEP\">百事可乐</a></b>– 这家零食和饮料巨头在盘前交易中上涨 1.3%,营收和利润均超出预期,并上调了全年预测。得益于北美饮料销量的增长,百事公司本季度调整后每股收益为 1.72 美元,比预期高出 19 美分。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a></b> – The bank reported a quarterly profit of $3.78 per share for the second quarter, beating the $3.21 consensus estimate, with revenue also topping Street forecasts. Results got a boost from an increase in investment banking fees, but the stock fell 1.3% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">摩根大通</a></b>– 该银行公布第二季度每股季度利润为 3.78 美元,超过市场普遍预期的 3.21 美元,收入也超出了华尔街的预期。投资银行费用的增加提振了业绩,但该股在盘前交易中下跌了 1.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BA\">Boeing</a></b> – Boeing shares fell 2.2% in the premarket, after saying it would cut the production rate for its 787 Dreamliner to deal with a new production-related issue. It now expects to deliver fewer than half of the roughly 100 787s in inventory this year, instead of the \"vast majority\" it had previously predicted.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BA\">波音</a></b>– 波音股价在盘前下跌 2.2%,此前该公司表示将削减 787 梦想客机的生产率,以应对新的生产相关问题。该公司现在预计今年交付的库存中大约 100 架 787 飞机不到一半,而不是之前预测的“绝大多数”。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a></b> – Goldman reported a second-quarter profit of $15.02 per share, beating the $10.24 consensus estimate, while revenue also exceeded Wall Street forecasts. Goldman's bottom line was helped by a surge in global deal fees.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">高盛</a></b>– 高盛公布第二季度每股利润为 15.02 美元,超出市场普遍预期的 10.24 美元,同时收入也超出了华尔街的预期。高盛的利润得益于全球交易费用的激增。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAG\">ConAgra</a></b> – The food producer beat estimates by 2 cents with adjusted quarterly earnings of 54 cents per share, with revenue topping analyst predictions as well. Conagra did cut its fiscal 2022 full-year forecast due to the impact of inflation, and its stock fell 3.7% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAG\">康尼格拉</a></b>– 这家食品生产商的调整后季度收益为每股 54 美分,超出预期 2 美分,收入也超出了分析师的预期。由于通胀影响,康尼格拉确实下调了 2022 财年全年预测,其股价在盘前交易中下跌了 3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">Nokia Oyj</a></b> – Nokia said it would announce an improved outlook for the year on July 29, when it reports its second-quarter results. The telecom equipment maker cites a pickup in business during the quarter. Shares surged 8.4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">诺基亚</a></b>– 诺基亚表示,将于 7 月 29 日公布第二季度业绩时公布改善后的今年前景。这家电信设备制造商表示,本季度业务有所回升。股价在盘前交易中飙升 8.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBI\">Hanesbrands</a> </b>– The stock jumped 3.2% in the premarket after Wells Fargo upgraded the apparel producer to \"overweight\" from \"equal weight\". Wells Fargo said it was impressed by the company's new leadership team and the overall direction of the business.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HBI\">哈内斯品牌</a></b>– 富国银行将这家服装生产商的评级从“同等权重”上调至“跑赢大盘”后,该股在盘前上涨 3.2%。富国银行表示,该公司新的领导团队和业务的整体方向给它留下了深刻的印象。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> </b> – Disney is raising subscription prices for its ESPN+ sports streaming platform. The monthly price goes up by $1 to $6.99, while the annual plan will increase by $10 to $69.99.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">华特·迪士尼</a></b>– 迪士尼正在提高其 ESPN+ 体育流媒体平台的订阅价格。每月价格上涨1美元至6.99美元,而年度计划将上涨10美元至69.99美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">Johnson & Johnson</a></b> – The FDA is adding a warning label to Johnson & Johnson's Covid-19 vaccine, to warn of a very small incidence of the rare neurological disorder known as Guillain-Barre syndrome. Johnson & Johnson fell 1% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">强生公司</a></b>– FDA 正在为强生公司的 Covid-19 疫苗添加警告标签,以警告格林-巴利综合征这种罕见神经系统疾病的发病率非常低。强生公司盘前下跌 1%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIIB\">Biogen</a></b> – The U.S. government has begun the review process that will determine if Medicare will cover the cost of Biogen's newly approved Alzheimer's drug Aduhelm. A final decision is expected within 9 months.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIIB\">百健</a></b>– 美国政府已开始审查程序,以确定医疗保险是否会支付百健新批准的阿尔茨海默氏症药物 Aduhelm 的费用。最终决定预计将在9个月内做出。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a></b> – McDonald's is backing franchisee efforts to attract more workers, making a multimillion investment in perks such as higher pay, more paid time off, college tuition aid and emergency child care.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">麦当劳</a></b>– 麦当劳支持特许经营商吸引更多工人的努力,投资数百万美元用于福利,如更高的工资、更多的带薪休假、大学学费援助和紧急儿童保育。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","GS":"高盛","BA":"波音",".DJI":"道琼斯","JPM":"摩根大通","NOK":"诺基亚","JNJ":"强生","DIS":"迪士尼","BIIB":"渤健公司","PEP":"百事可乐",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","CAG":"康尼格拉","HBI":"哈尼斯品牌服装"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123282588","content_text":"U.S. stock index futures traded mixed on Tuesday, as investors awaited earnings updates from big banks and a reading on inflation data for early clues on the health of the domestic economy.\nAt 8:05 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 20 points, or 0.06%, S&P 500 E-minis were up 0.75 points, or 0.02% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 48.25 points, or 0.32%.\n*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 08:05\nJune-quarter earnings per share for S&P 500 companies is expected to rise 66%, according to Refinitiv data, with market participants questioning how long Wall Street's rally would last after a nearly 17% rise in the benchmark index so far this year.\nConsumer price index data is due at 08:30 a.m. ET and is expected to ease in June after jumping 5% on a year-over-year basis in May.\nInflation and positive economic data have dictated Wall Street's movement since mid June as investors fear an overheating economy amid faster reopening could force the Federal Reserve to pare back its ultra-loose monetary policies sooner-than expected.\n\"The broad markets are settling back and awaiting US inflation, US bank earnings... We view the environment as one of gestation as earnings comes in before the risk taking trend starts again, though a higher inflation print could create a temporary setback,\" said Sebastien Galy, senior macro strategist at Nordea Asset Management.\nStocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:\nPepsi – The snack and beverage giant gained 1.3% in premarket trading, after beating estimates on the top and bottom lines and raising its full-year forecast. PepsiCo earned an adjusted $1.72 per share for the quarter, 19 cents above estimates, helped by increasing North American beverage sales.\nJPMorgan Chase – The bank reported a quarterly profit of $3.78 per share for the second quarter, beating the $3.21 consensus estimate, with revenue also topping Street forecasts. Results got a boost from an increase in investment banking fees, but the stock fell 1.3% in premarket action.\nBoeing – Boeing shares fell 2.2% in the premarket, after saying it would cut the production rate for its 787 Dreamliner to deal with a new production-related issue. It now expects to deliver fewer than half of the roughly 100 787s in inventory this year, instead of the \"vast majority\" it had previously predicted.\nGoldman Sachs – Goldman reported a second-quarter profit of $15.02 per share, beating the $10.24 consensus estimate, while revenue also exceeded Wall Street forecasts. Goldman's bottom line was helped by a surge in global deal fees.\nConAgra – The food producer beat estimates by 2 cents with adjusted quarterly earnings of 54 cents per share, with revenue topping analyst predictions as well. Conagra did cut its fiscal 2022 full-year forecast due to the impact of inflation, and its stock fell 3.7% in premarket action.\nNokia Oyj – Nokia said it would announce an improved outlook for the year on July 29, when it reports its second-quarter results. The telecom equipment maker cites a pickup in business during the quarter. Shares surged 8.4% in premarket trading.\nHanesbrands – The stock jumped 3.2% in the premarket after Wells Fargo upgraded the apparel producer to \"overweight\" from \"equal weight\". Wells Fargo said it was impressed by the company's new leadership team and the overall direction of the business.\nWalt Disney – Disney is raising subscription prices for its ESPN+ sports streaming platform. The monthly price goes up by $1 to $6.99, while the annual plan will increase by $10 to $69.99.\nJohnson & Johnson – The FDA is adding a warning label to Johnson & Johnson's Covid-19 vaccine, to warn of a very small incidence of the rare neurological disorder known as Guillain-Barre syndrome. Johnson & Johnson fell 1% in the premarket.\nBiogen – The U.S. government has begun the review process that will determine if Medicare will cover the cost of Biogen's newly approved Alzheimer's drug Aduhelm. A final decision is expected within 9 months.\nMcDonald's – McDonald's is backing franchisee efforts to attract more workers, making a multimillion investment in perks such as higher pay, more paid time off, college tuition aid and emergency child care.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BIIB":0.9,"PEP":0.9,"GS":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"JNJ":0.9,"CAG":0.9,"HBI":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"DIS":0.9,"JPM":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"NOK":0.9,"BA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":764,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148629169,"gmtCreate":1625972581951,"gmtModify":1633931220614,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148629169","repostId":"1112201050","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112201050","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625966101,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1112201050?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-11 09:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112201050","media":"Barrons","summary":"It seemed to be only a matter of time.\nWhen GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the de","content":"<p>It seemed to be only a matter of time.</p><p><blockquote>这似乎只是时间问题。</blockquote></p><p> When GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?</p><p><blockquote>当游戏驿站(股票代码:GME)、黑莓(BB),甚至百视达的干涸尸体在一月份突然复活时,它们何时会再次坠毁的时间已经在流逝。会是几个小时、几天还是几周?</blockquote></p><p> It has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.</p><p><blockquote>现在已经过去半年了,核心 “备忘录股票 ”的交易价格仍然处于研究这些股票多年的人认为离谱的水平。Clover Health Investments (CLOV) 和 Newegg Commerce (NEGG) 等新名称最近出现在留言板上,它们的股票也随之上涨。</blockquote></p><p> The collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.</p><p><blockquote>数百万散户交易员--长期以来被嘲笑为 “哑巴钱 ”--的集体努力成功地让股市飙升,并迫使反对者投降。</blockquote></p><p> That is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.</p><p><blockquote>尽管他们押注的公司几乎没有表现出业务转型的迹象,也没有表现出足以证明其估值的利润,但情况确实如此。黑莓在最近一个季度烧钱,并警告称其关键的网络安全部门将达到收入指导的低端;消息传出后,该股下跌,但在过去一年中仍上涨了一倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大型经纪商的交易量较 2 月份的峰值略有下降,但仍高于疫情爆发前的两到三倍。数量惊人的这种活动发生在散户交易者青睐的股票中。例如,AMC院线控股公司(AMC)6 月份的日均交易额达到 131 亿美元,超过了苹果(AAPL)的 95 亿美元和亚马逊(AMZN)的 103 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.</p><p><blockquote>即使冠状病毒在美国消退,大多数新交易者表示,他们仍然致力于他们在封锁期间学到的爱好——在一项Betterment调查中,58%的日内交易者表示,他们计划在未来进行更多的交易,只有12%的人计划减少交易。业余疫情面包师已经停止揉捏酸面团面包;交易者只会变得越来越饥饿。</blockquote></p><p> A sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.</p><p><blockquote>持续的熊市会破坏这种食欲,就像互联网泡沫破裂时一样。目前,下跌是持有或买入的理由。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25a79e71371c165f9a3a5085931fc487\" tg-width=\"979\" tg-height=\"649\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to Barron’s.</p><p><blockquote>“美国海军电子技术员布兰登-卢切克(Brandon Luczek)在给《巴伦周刊》的一封电子邮件中写道:”我看到'逢低买入'的情绪一刻也没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> The meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票飙升是由散户投资者交易的增加推动的。2020年,在线经纪商以创纪录的速度签约客户,超过1000万人开设了新账户。这一记录几乎肯定会在2021年被打破。一些顶级公司透露,在今年不到一半的时间里,经纪商已经增加了超过 1000 万个账户。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.</p><p><blockquote>模因股票既是这种现象的推车,也是马。他们的价格突然飙升是由新投资者推动的,然后这一行动推动更多的新人投资。数百万人在 1 月底和 2 月初下载了投资应用程序,只是为了享受乐趣。嘉信理财(SCHW)最近的一项调查发现,15%的现有交易者在2020年后开始投资。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/167386c6881a258922ad62caaf7a05f4\" tg-width=\"971\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e29e3041b91070252ab9063d1a11fa2\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"642\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9cc1c0bd6368721c0eca87e25719f16\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"641\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.</p><p><blockquote>激增中最突出的参与者是 Robinhood,该公司表示仅在第一季度就增加了 550 万个资金账户。但它并不孤单。例如,富达宣布,第一季度吸引了 160 万 35 岁以下的新客户,比去年同期增长了 223%。</blockquote></p><p> Under pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>在 Robinhood 零佣金模式的压力下,所有主要经纪商都在 2019 年将佣金降至零。这为新客户群体打开了闸门——他们可能没有那么多闲置现金进行交易,但比前辈更加活跃和多样化。经纪人正在套现。富达希望在投资者获得驾照之前就吸引他们,允许年仅 13 岁的儿童开设交易账户。Robinhood 正在乘势而上进行首次公开募股,分析师预计其估值将超过其收入的 10 倍。</blockquote></p><p> These new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”</p><p><blockquote>这些新客户的行为与他们的老同行不同。E*Trade 交易主管克里斯-拉金(Chris Larkin)说,多年来,“ETF 一直备受青睐”,E*Trade 现归摩根士丹利(MS)所有。但挑选个股显然是 “2021 年的大新闻”。</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是,随着世界各地的投资者押注疫情复苏并避免疲软的债券收益率,股票交易所交易基金仍然表现良好。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.</p><p><blockquote>但 ETF 不像股票那样点亮留言板。这并不是说顶级公司的单行道。游戏驿站二月份确实下跌,华尔街享受了幸灾乐祸的时刻。它并没有持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> “Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.</p><p><blockquote>“盈透证券(Interactive Brokers)首席策略师史蒂夫-索斯尼克(Steve Sosnick)写道:”就像蝉一样,备忘录交易者在表面上隐匿了几个月后又重新活跃起来。索斯尼克认为,模因股票的交易往往与加密货币相反,因为随着势头的变化,它们的粉丝会从一种货币转向另一种货币。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道:”我不认为,在比特币和其他加密货币大幅回调后,备忘录股票卷土重来完全是巧合。</blockquote></p><p> Sosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.</p><p><blockquote>索斯尼克认为备忘录股票是一个 “独立的板块”,他在电脑显示器上将其与其他股票代码分开。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.</p><p><blockquote>事实上,华尔街对备忘录股票革命的反应一直是孤立专业人士认为不理性的市场部分。大多数卖空者不会碰这些股票,分析师也在放弃报道。</blockquote></p><p> But Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.</p><p><blockquote>但华尔街不能像蝉一样把零售大军赶走,也不能指望它们在未来 17 年内消失。股票交易已经发生了永久性的变化。今年,零售活动占股本量的 24%,高于 2019 年的 15%。新信条的追随者不是愿意让华尔街管理市场的被动观察者。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/710e642d3b685b74f8c9dcaf46ef3e0b\" tg-width=\"968\" tg-height=\"643\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”</p><p><blockquote>“哥伦比亚法学院(Columbia Law School)专门研究证券市场的教授约书亚-米茨(Joshua Mitts)说:”这实际上反映了我们所看到的趋势的逆转,即与个别公司的接触越来越少。“技术正在拉近普通投资者与他或她所投资的公司的距离,而这只是以新的、不可预测的形式出现。”</blockquote></p><p> The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.</p><p><blockquote>你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> — Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube</p><p><blockquote>— Matt Kohrs,26 岁,每天在 YouTube 上直播股票分析</blockquote></p><p> It is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.</p><p><blockquote>它现在正在改变那些早早加入的人的生活,并且仍然在更高的名字上。</blockquote></p><p> Take Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming stock analysis on YouTube for seven hours a day.</p><p><blockquote>以马特·科尔斯为例,他很早就投资了AMC院线。今年2月,他辞去了纽约程序员的工作,搬到了费城,并开始在YouTube上每天7个小时直播股票分析。</blockquote></p><p> With 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.</p><p><blockquote>YouTube 拥有 35 万粉丝,它正在支付账单。科尔斯说,凭借广告和股票的收入,他可以拿到与以前大致相同的工资。但他也知道,像这样依赖股票收益与朝九晚五的工作完全不同。</blockquote></p><p> “The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> Companies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.</p><p><blockquote>公司也开始做出更积极的反应。他们要么拥抱他们的新主人,要么付钱给迷因学家来理解新华尔街充满表情符号的语言,这样他们就可以阻止他们或安抚他们。</blockquote></p><p> AMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 甚至在上周取消了一项拟议的股权融资,因为该公司显然不喜欢 Reddit 人群的反响。过去一年,AMC 的股票数量已经增加了五倍。首席执行官亚当-阿伦(Adam Aron)在推特上表示,他看到了 “许多人赞成,许多人反对 ”对他增发 2500 万股股票的提议的反应,因此该提议将被取消,而不是在本月晚些时候的 AMC 年会上进行表决。该公司没有回答有关如何调查股东的问题。</blockquote></p><p> Forget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.</p><p><blockquote>忘了会议室吧。公司政策现在正在聊天室里决定。</blockquote></p><p> Big investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.</p><p><blockquote>大投资者正在花费更多时间跟踪社交媒体上有关股票的讨论。美国银行在今年的一项调查中发现,大约25%的机构已经在跟踪社交媒体情绪,但大约40%的机构有兴趣在未来使用它。</blockquote></p><p> In the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几个月里,美国银行、摩根士丹利和摩根大通都发布了关于如何围绕零售行动进行交易的报告,得出了有些不同的结论。</blockquote></p><p> There can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.</p><p><blockquote>正如摩根士丹利所说,信号中可能存在 “阿尔法”,但要实现这一目标可能需要一些紧张的数字运算。当然,并不是所有的留言板聊天都会导致价格持续上涨,如果没有大量的数据分析,零售订单流很难与机构流分开。对于拥有工具来确定散户投资者正在购买哪些股票和正在出售哪些股票的投资者来说,摩根大通建议做多买入兴趣最高的 20% 的股票,做空卖出兴趣最高的 20% 的股票。</blockquote></p><p> For now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>提供跟踪社交媒体情绪产品的另类数据公司Thinknum的鲍里斯·斯皮瓦克(Boris Spiwak)表示,目前,许多购买社交媒体情绪数据的机构似乎都在试图降低风险,而不是寻找新的机会。“他说:”他们认为这几乎就像一份保险,以限制他们的下行风险。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.</p><p><blockquote>对于零售商来说,这种方法并不总是科学的。这一行动是由社区精神支撑的。其背后的力量既是情感上的,也是道德上的,也是经济上的。</blockquote></p><p> New investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>新投资者表示,他们的动机是希望证明自己,并像利润一样惩罚保守派。他们互相学习市场,有时会放大或揭穿关于华尔街的阴谋论。一些人将模因股票运动与2008年金融危机引发的对大型金融机构的持续不信任联系起来。</blockquote></p><p> “Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”</p><p><blockquote>“26 岁的科尔斯说:”华尔街让我们的经济陷入困境,但没有人因此惹上麻烦。“所以,我认为他们认为我们不仅可以赚钱,还可以让华尔街的这些对冲基金付钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Claire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”</p><p><blockquote>克莱尔·赫希伯格 (Claire Hirschberg) 是一名 28 岁的工会组织者,她在 1 月份从朋友那里听说 Robinhood 上购买了价值约 50 美元的游戏驿站股票。她喜欢这个想法,但真正让她兴奋的是她父亲的反应,他是一名长期的资金经理。“她笑着说:”他很生气我买了游戏驿站,还不肯卖。“这让我想永远拿着它。”</blockquote></p><p> Just like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.</p><p><blockquote>就像老华尔街有仪式和准则一样,新华尔街也有。一位新的投资银行员工很快就会知道,在你成为合伙人之前,你不会打菲拉格慕领带。在总经理离开之前,你从不离开办公室,你也不会抱怨工作时间。坏人是监管者和参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦,而且不是按顺序。</blockquote></p><p> The new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.</p><p><blockquote>新的交易台——数百万散户交易者现在使用的应用程序和他们聚集的留言板——也有潜规则。公开承认财务损失是一种勇敢的行为,是内部坚韧和对本集团信念的证明。你不把自己当回事,也不规范语言。你是 “猿类 ”或 “弱智 ”大军的一员。你坚持住,即使这意味着你可能会失去一切。坏人依次是卖空者、做市商和华尔街精英。</blockquote></p><p> The group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>集体行动不仅仅是为了精神支持。交易策略取决于人们保持买入压力,迫使做空,或买入看涨期权,从而引发所谓的伽马挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75d79c78a14cc8f297e17397cc54bdb5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Keith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>基思·吉尔 (Keith Gill) 在二月份众议院金融服务委员会听证会上虚拟露面,成为 Reddit 散户交易员大军推高游戏驿站股价的代言人。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Many short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.</p><p><blockquote>许多卖空者表示,他们不会再碰这些股票了。但显然,其他人并没有采纳这一建议,而是通过反复做空股票来给备忘录运动注入氧气。6 月中旬,AMC 的空头权益占该股流通量的 17%,低于 1 月份的 28%,但降幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> As the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”</p><p><blockquote>随着价格上涨,空头们也控制不住自己。多年来一直关注游戏驿站的韦德布什证券分析师迈克尔-帕切特(Michael Pachter)说,他们开始 “流口水,耳朵里冒出火焰”。“他说:”让我感到震惊的是精神错乱的定义,就是一遍又一遍地做同样的事情,每次都希望有不同的结果,而空头却不断出现。“[游戏驿站公牛]基思-吉尔(Keith Gill)和他的 Reddit raiders 一直在挤压他们,而且一直在起作用。”</blockquote></p><p> To beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.</p><p><blockquote>为了击败卖空者,Reddit 人群需要团结起来,但该社区有时会出现裂缝。拥有最坚定粉丝群的两只模因股票——游戏驿站和 AMC——仍然拥有庞大的核心信徒大军,他们似乎不容易动摇。但其他名字似乎有更善变的支持者。几只陷入迷因疯狂的股票已经崩溃。 Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) 在 1 月底和 6 月初两次飙升,但现在的交易价格仅略高于 1 月中旬的水平。在上涨期间买入的人已经赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Distrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.</p><p><blockquote>不信任已经蔓延,一些交易员担心 wallstreetbets——激发游戏驿站狂热的最初 Reddit 留言板——发展如此之快,以至于它已经失去了最初的精神,并可能变得容易受到操纵。有些人搬到了其他留言板,如 r/superstonk,希望能重现老社区的风味。</blockquote></p><p> Travis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.</p><p><blockquote>社交媒体跟踪公司 Hype Equity 的创始人特拉维斯·雷尔 (Travis Rehl) 表示,他试图将可能的操纵者与更有机的投资者情绪区分开来。他说,炒作股权通常由代表网上谈论的公司的公关公司雇佣。现在,他看到了一种不断增长的趋势,即股票突然出现在留言板上,收到积极的聊天,然后消失。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from Barron’s for comment.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”这让人怀疑什么是真正的讨论,什么是某人只想炒作的东西。wallstreetbets 的版主禁止在该平台上操纵市场,Rehl 表示,他们似乎正在努力遏制错误信息。主持人没有回应《巴伦周刊》的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> “If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.</p><p><blockquote>“索斯尼克说:”如果你能制造足够的轰动效应,让一只股票在短时间内上涨 10%、20%,甚至 50%,那么你就有巨大的动力去做这件事。</blockquote></p><p> The Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在关注留言板上的有趣交易。美国证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)和一些国会议员讨论了改变市场规则,目的是增加保护散户交易者的透明度——尽管如果这些变化减缓交易速度或使交易成本更高,也可能激怒零售人群。</blockquote></p><p> Regulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”</p><p><blockquote>监管并不是唯一能遏制这一趋势的因素。fintech Betterment 行为金融和投资副总裁丹·伊根 (Dan Egan) 认为,这种势头可能会在 9 月份耗尽。即使是 “猿猴 ”也有责任。“他说:”孩子们开始重返校园;家长们也可以自由地再次上班了。“那是下一次从房间里抽出氧气的时候了。”</blockquote></p><p> Traditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.</p><p><blockquote>传统投资者可能会倾向于将整个现象视为由封锁和免费政府资金引发的暂时疯狂。但那将是一个错误。如果零佣金经纪和游戏驿站乐趣打破了数百万新投资者开户的障碍,那么只要大多数人用他们并不立即需要的钱下注,这几乎肯定是一件好事。许多新零售商表示,他们正在自学如何交易,并开始分散持股。</blockquote></p><p> In one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何,这是华尔街未来的客户群。</blockquote></p><p> Arizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking research in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.</p><p><blockquote>亚利桑那州立大学教授亨德里克-贝森宾德(Hendrik Bessembinder)在2018年发表了一项开创性的研究,发现“在随机选择的月份随机选择的股票,亏损的可能性大于赚钱的可能性”。简而言之,挑选单只股票并持有集中投资组合往往是一种失败的策略。</blockquote></p><p> Even so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”</p><p><blockquote>即便如此,他还是对新一波交易感到鼓舞。“贝森宾德说:”我欢迎零售交易的增加,欢迎股票市场成为一个广泛参与的地方。“经济学家不能告诉人们他们不应该找点乐子”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-11 09:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It seemed to be only a matter of time.</p><p><blockquote>这似乎只是时间问题。</blockquote></p><p> When GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?</p><p><blockquote>当游戏驿站(股票代码:GME)、黑莓(BB),甚至百视达的干涸尸体在一月份突然复活时,它们何时会再次坠毁的时间已经在流逝。会是几个小时、几天还是几周?</blockquote></p><p> It has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.</p><p><blockquote>现在已经过去半年了,核心 “备忘录股票 ”的交易价格仍然处于研究这些股票多年的人认为离谱的水平。Clover Health Investments (CLOV) 和 Newegg Commerce (NEGG) 等新名称最近出现在留言板上,它们的股票也随之上涨。</blockquote></p><p> The collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.</p><p><blockquote>数百万散户交易员--长期以来被嘲笑为 “哑巴钱 ”--的集体努力成功地让股市飙升,并迫使反对者投降。</blockquote></p><p> That is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.</p><p><blockquote>尽管他们押注的公司几乎没有表现出业务转型的迹象,也没有表现出足以证明其估值的利润,但情况确实如此。黑莓在最近一个季度烧钱,并警告称其关键的网络安全部门将达到收入指导的低端;消息传出后,该股下跌,但在过去一年中仍上涨了一倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大型经纪商的交易量较 2 月份的峰值略有下降,但仍高于疫情爆发前的两到三倍。数量惊人的这种活动发生在散户交易者青睐的股票中。例如,AMC院线控股公司(AMC)6 月份的日均交易额达到 131 亿美元,超过了苹果(AAPL)的 95 亿美元和亚马逊(AMZN)的 103 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.</p><p><blockquote>即使冠状病毒在美国消退,大多数新交易者表示,他们仍然致力于他们在封锁期间学到的爱好——在一项Betterment调查中,58%的日内交易者表示,他们计划在未来进行更多的交易,只有12%的人计划减少交易。业余疫情面包师已经停止揉捏酸面团面包;交易者只会变得越来越饥饿。</blockquote></p><p> A sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.</p><p><blockquote>持续的熊市会破坏这种食欲,就像互联网泡沫破裂时一样。目前,下跌是持有或买入的理由。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25a79e71371c165f9a3a5085931fc487\" tg-width=\"979\" tg-height=\"649\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to Barron’s.</p><p><blockquote>“美国海军电子技术员布兰登-卢切克(Brandon Luczek)在给《巴伦周刊》的一封电子邮件中写道:”我看到'逢低买入'的情绪一刻也没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> The meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票飙升是由散户投资者交易的增加推动的。2020年,在线经纪商以创纪录的速度签约客户,超过1000万人开设了新账户。这一记录几乎肯定会在2021年被打破。一些顶级公司透露,在今年不到一半的时间里,经纪商已经增加了超过 1000 万个账户。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.</p><p><blockquote>模因股票既是这种现象的推车,也是马。他们的价格突然飙升是由新投资者推动的,然后这一行动推动更多的新人投资。数百万人在 1 月底和 2 月初下载了投资应用程序,只是为了享受乐趣。嘉信理财(SCHW)最近的一项调查发现,15%的现有交易者在2020年后开始投资。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/167386c6881a258922ad62caaf7a05f4\" tg-width=\"971\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e29e3041b91070252ab9063d1a11fa2\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"642\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9cc1c0bd6368721c0eca87e25719f16\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"641\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.</p><p><blockquote>激增中最突出的参与者是 Robinhood,该公司表示仅在第一季度就增加了 550 万个资金账户。但它并不孤单。例如,富达宣布,第一季度吸引了 160 万 35 岁以下的新客户,比去年同期增长了 223%。</blockquote></p><p> Under pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>在 Robinhood 零佣金模式的压力下,所有主要经纪商都在 2019 年将佣金降至零。这为新客户群体打开了闸门——他们可能没有那么多闲置现金进行交易,但比前辈更加活跃和多样化。经纪人正在套现。富达希望在投资者获得驾照之前就吸引他们,允许年仅 13 岁的儿童开设交易账户。Robinhood 正在乘势而上进行首次公开募股,分析师预计其估值将超过其收入的 10 倍。</blockquote></p><p> These new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”</p><p><blockquote>这些新客户的行为与他们的老同行不同。E*Trade 交易主管克里斯-拉金(Chris Larkin)说,多年来,“ETF 一直备受青睐”,E*Trade 现归摩根士丹利(MS)所有。但挑选个股显然是 “2021 年的大新闻”。</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是,随着世界各地的投资者押注疫情复苏并避免疲软的债券收益率,股票交易所交易基金仍然表现良好。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.</p><p><blockquote>但 ETF 不像股票那样点亮留言板。这并不是说顶级公司的单行道。游戏驿站二月份确实下跌,华尔街享受了幸灾乐祸的时刻。它并没有持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> “Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.</p><p><blockquote>“盈透证券(Interactive Brokers)首席策略师史蒂夫-索斯尼克(Steve Sosnick)写道:”就像蝉一样,备忘录交易者在表面上隐匿了几个月后又重新活跃起来。索斯尼克认为,模因股票的交易往往与加密货币相反,因为随着势头的变化,它们的粉丝会从一种货币转向另一种货币。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道:”我不认为,在比特币和其他加密货币大幅回调后,备忘录股票卷土重来完全是巧合。</blockquote></p><p> Sosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.</p><p><blockquote>索斯尼克认为备忘录股票是一个 “独立的板块”,他在电脑显示器上将其与其他股票代码分开。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.</p><p><blockquote>事实上,华尔街对备忘录股票革命的反应一直是孤立专业人士认为不理性的市场部分。大多数卖空者不会碰这些股票,分析师也在放弃报道。</blockquote></p><p> But Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.</p><p><blockquote>但华尔街不能像蝉一样把零售大军赶走,也不能指望它们在未来 17 年内消失。股票交易已经发生了永久性的变化。今年,零售活动占股本量的 24%,高于 2019 年的 15%。新信条的追随者不是愿意让华尔街管理市场的被动观察者。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/710e642d3b685b74f8c9dcaf46ef3e0b\" tg-width=\"968\" tg-height=\"643\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”</p><p><blockquote>“哥伦比亚法学院(Columbia Law School)专门研究证券市场的教授约书亚-米茨(Joshua Mitts)说:”这实际上反映了我们所看到的趋势的逆转,即与个别公司的接触越来越少。“技术正在拉近普通投资者与他或她所投资的公司的距离,而这只是以新的、不可预测的形式出现。”</blockquote></p><p> The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.</p><p><blockquote>你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> — Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube</p><p><blockquote>— Matt Kohrs,26 岁,每天在 YouTube 上直播股票分析</blockquote></p><p> It is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.</p><p><blockquote>它现在正在改变那些早早加入的人的生活,并且仍然在更高的名字上。</blockquote></p><p> Take Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming stock analysis on YouTube for seven hours a day.</p><p><blockquote>以马特·科尔斯为例,他很早就投资了AMC院线。今年2月,他辞去了纽约程序员的工作,搬到了费城,并开始在YouTube上每天7个小时直播股票分析。</blockquote></p><p> With 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.</p><p><blockquote>YouTube 拥有 35 万粉丝,它正在支付账单。科尔斯说,凭借广告和股票的收入,他可以拿到与以前大致相同的工资。但他也知道,像这样依赖股票收益与朝九晚五的工作完全不同。</blockquote></p><p> “The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> Companies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.</p><p><blockquote>公司也开始做出更积极的反应。他们要么拥抱他们的新主人,要么付钱给迷因学家来理解新华尔街充满表情符号的语言,这样他们就可以阻止他们或安抚他们。</blockquote></p><p> AMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 甚至在上周取消了一项拟议的股权融资,因为该公司显然不喜欢 Reddit 人群的反响。过去一年,AMC 的股票数量已经增加了五倍。首席执行官亚当-阿伦(Adam Aron)在推特上表示,他看到了 “许多人赞成,许多人反对 ”对他增发 2500 万股股票的提议的反应,因此该提议将被取消,而不是在本月晚些时候的 AMC 年会上进行表决。该公司没有回答有关如何调查股东的问题。</blockquote></p><p> Forget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.</p><p><blockquote>忘了会议室吧。公司政策现在正在聊天室里决定。</blockquote></p><p> Big investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.</p><p><blockquote>大投资者正在花费更多时间跟踪社交媒体上有关股票的讨论。美国银行在今年的一项调查中发现,大约25%的机构已经在跟踪社交媒体情绪,但大约40%的机构有兴趣在未来使用它。</blockquote></p><p> In the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几个月里,美国银行、摩根士丹利和摩根大通都发布了关于如何围绕零售行动进行交易的报告,得出了有些不同的结论。</blockquote></p><p> There can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.</p><p><blockquote>正如摩根士丹利所说,信号中可能存在 “阿尔法”,但要实现这一目标可能需要一些紧张的数字运算。当然,并不是所有的留言板聊天都会导致价格持续上涨,如果没有大量的数据分析,零售订单流很难与机构流分开。对于拥有工具来确定散户投资者正在购买哪些股票和正在出售哪些股票的投资者来说,摩根大通建议做多买入兴趣最高的 20% 的股票,做空卖出兴趣最高的 20% 的股票。</blockquote></p><p> For now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>提供跟踪社交媒体情绪产品的另类数据公司Thinknum的鲍里斯·斯皮瓦克(Boris Spiwak)表示,目前,许多购买社交媒体情绪数据的机构似乎都在试图降低风险,而不是寻找新的机会。“他说:”他们认为这几乎就像一份保险,以限制他们的下行风险。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.</p><p><blockquote>对于零售商来说,这种方法并不总是科学的。这一行动是由社区精神支撑的。其背后的力量既是情感上的,也是道德上的,也是经济上的。</blockquote></p><p> New investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>新投资者表示,他们的动机是希望证明自己,并像利润一样惩罚保守派。他们互相学习市场,有时会放大或揭穿关于华尔街的阴谋论。一些人将模因股票运动与2008年金融危机引发的对大型金融机构的持续不信任联系起来。</blockquote></p><p> “Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”</p><p><blockquote>“26 岁的科尔斯说:”华尔街让我们的经济陷入困境,但没有人因此惹上麻烦。“所以,我认为他们认为我们不仅可以赚钱,还可以让华尔街的这些对冲基金付钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Claire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”</p><p><blockquote>克莱尔·赫希伯格 (Claire Hirschberg) 是一名 28 岁的工会组织者,她在 1 月份从朋友那里听说 Robinhood 上购买了价值约 50 美元的游戏驿站股票。她喜欢这个想法,但真正让她兴奋的是她父亲的反应,他是一名长期的资金经理。“她笑着说:”他很生气我买了游戏驿站,还不肯卖。“这让我想永远拿着它。”</blockquote></p><p> Just like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.</p><p><blockquote>就像老华尔街有仪式和准则一样,新华尔街也有。一位新的投资银行员工很快就会知道,在你成为合伙人之前,你不会打菲拉格慕领带。在总经理离开之前,你从不离开办公室,你也不会抱怨工作时间。坏人是监管者和参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦,而且不是按顺序。</blockquote></p><p> The new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.</p><p><blockquote>新的交易台——数百万散户交易者现在使用的应用程序和他们聚集的留言板——也有潜规则。公开承认财务损失是一种勇敢的行为,是内部坚韧和对本集团信念的证明。你不把自己当回事,也不规范语言。你是 “猿类 ”或 “弱智 ”大军的一员。你坚持住,即使这意味着你可能会失去一切。坏人依次是卖空者、做市商和华尔街精英。</blockquote></p><p> The group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>集体行动不仅仅是为了精神支持。交易策略取决于人们保持买入压力,迫使做空,或买入看涨期权,从而引发所谓的伽马挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75d79c78a14cc8f297e17397cc54bdb5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Keith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>基思·吉尔 (Keith Gill) 在二月份众议院金融服务委员会听证会上虚拟露面,成为 Reddit 散户交易员大军推高游戏驿站股价的代言人。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Many short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.</p><p><blockquote>许多卖空者表示,他们不会再碰这些股票了。但显然,其他人并没有采纳这一建议,而是通过反复做空股票来给备忘录运动注入氧气。6 月中旬,AMC 的空头权益占该股流通量的 17%,低于 1 月份的 28%,但降幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> As the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”</p><p><blockquote>随着价格上涨,空头们也控制不住自己。多年来一直关注游戏驿站的韦德布什证券分析师迈克尔-帕切特(Michael Pachter)说,他们开始 “流口水,耳朵里冒出火焰”。“他说:”让我感到震惊的是精神错乱的定义,就是一遍又一遍地做同样的事情,每次都希望有不同的结果,而空头却不断出现。“[游戏驿站公牛]基思-吉尔(Keith Gill)和他的 Reddit raiders 一直在挤压他们,而且一直在起作用。”</blockquote></p><p> To beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.</p><p><blockquote>为了击败卖空者,Reddit 人群需要团结起来,但该社区有时会出现裂缝。拥有最坚定粉丝群的两只模因股票——游戏驿站和 AMC——仍然拥有庞大的核心信徒大军,他们似乎不容易动摇。但其他名字似乎有更善变的支持者。几只陷入迷因疯狂的股票已经崩溃。 Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) 在 1 月底和 6 月初两次飙升,但现在的交易价格仅略高于 1 月中旬的水平。在上涨期间买入的人已经赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Distrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.</p><p><blockquote>不信任已经蔓延,一些交易员担心 wallstreetbets——激发游戏驿站狂热的最初 Reddit 留言板——发展如此之快,以至于它已经失去了最初的精神,并可能变得容易受到操纵。有些人搬到了其他留言板,如 r/superstonk,希望能重现老社区的风味。</blockquote></p><p> Travis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.</p><p><blockquote>社交媒体跟踪公司 Hype Equity 的创始人特拉维斯·雷尔 (Travis Rehl) 表示,他试图将可能的操纵者与更有机的投资者情绪区分开来。他说,炒作股权通常由代表网上谈论的公司的公关公司雇佣。现在,他看到了一种不断增长的趋势,即股票突然出现在留言板上,收到积极的聊天,然后消失。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from Barron’s for comment.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”这让人怀疑什么是真正的讨论,什么是某人只想炒作的东西。wallstreetbets 的版主禁止在该平台上操纵市场,Rehl 表示,他们似乎正在努力遏制错误信息。主持人没有回应《巴伦周刊》的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> “If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.</p><p><blockquote>“索斯尼克说:”如果你能制造足够的轰动效应,让一只股票在短时间内上涨 10%、20%,甚至 50%,那么你就有巨大的动力去做这件事。</blockquote></p><p> The Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在关注留言板上的有趣交易。美国证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)和一些国会议员讨论了改变市场规则,目的是增加保护散户交易者的透明度——尽管如果这些变化减缓交易速度或使交易成本更高,也可能激怒零售人群。</blockquote></p><p> Regulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”</p><p><blockquote>监管并不是唯一能遏制这一趋势的因素。fintech Betterment 行为金融和投资副总裁丹·伊根 (Dan Egan) 认为,这种势头可能会在 9 月份耗尽。即使是 “猿猴 ”也有责任。“他说:”孩子们开始重返校园;家长们也可以自由地再次上班了。“那是下一次从房间里抽出氧气的时候了。”</blockquote></p><p> Traditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.</p><p><blockquote>传统投资者可能会倾向于将整个现象视为由封锁和免费政府资金引发的暂时疯狂。但那将是一个错误。如果零佣金经纪和游戏驿站乐趣打破了数百万新投资者开户的障碍,那么只要大多数人用他们并不立即需要的钱下注,这几乎肯定是一件好事。许多新零售商表示,他们正在自学如何交易,并开始分散持股。</blockquote></p><p> In one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何,这是华尔街未来的客户群。</blockquote></p><p> Arizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking research in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.</p><p><blockquote>亚利桑那州立大学教授亨德里克-贝森宾德(Hendrik Bessembinder)在2018年发表了一项开创性的研究,发现“在随机选择的月份随机选择的股票,亏损的可能性大于赚钱的可能性”。简而言之,挑选单只股票并持有集中投资组合往往是一种失败的策略。</blockquote></p><p> Even so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”</p><p><blockquote>即便如此,他还是对新一波交易感到鼓舞。“贝森宾德说:”我欢迎零售交易的增加,欢迎股票市场成为一个广泛参与的地方。“经济学家不能告诉人们他们不应该找点乐子”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-meme-stock-trade-is-far-from-over-what-investors-need-to-know-51625875247?mod=hp_HERO\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SCHW":"嘉信理财","WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp","BB":"黑莓","NEGG":"Newegg Comm Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站","CARV":"卡弗储蓄"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-meme-stock-trade-is-far-from-over-what-investors-need-to-know-51625875247?mod=hp_HERO","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112201050","content_text":"It seemed to be only a matter of time.\nWhen GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?\nIt has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.\nThe collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.\nThat is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.\nWhile trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.\nEven as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.\nA sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.\n\n“I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to Barron’s.\nThe meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.\nMeme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.\n\nThe most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.\nUnder pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.\nThese new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”\nTo be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.\nBut ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.\n“Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.\n“I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.\nSosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.\nIndeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.\nBut Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.\n\n“What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”\nThe swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.\n— Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube\nIt is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.\nTake Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming stock analysis on YouTube for seven hours a day.\nWith 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.\n“The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.\nCompanies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.\nAMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.\nForget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.\nBig investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.\nIn the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.\nThere can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.\nFor now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.\nFor retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.\nNew investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.\n“Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”\nClaire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”\nJust like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.\nThe new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.\nThe group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.\nKeith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.\nMany short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.\nAs the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”\nTo beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.\nDistrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.\nTravis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.\n“It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from Barron’s for comment.\n“If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.\nThe Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.\nRegulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”\nTraditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.\nIn one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.\nArizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking research in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.\nEven so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9,"CARV":0.9,"WKHS":0.9,"BBBY":0.9,"CLOV":0.9,"BB":0.9,"GME":0.9,"MRIN":0.9,"NEGG":0.9,"SCHW":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":748,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148664172,"gmtCreate":1625972353696,"gmtModify":1633931223053,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148664172","repostId":"1135090843","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":521,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148918171,"gmtCreate":1625914239893,"gmtModify":1633936141658,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148918171","repostId":"1138077902","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1138077902","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1625883154,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1138077902?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-10 10:12","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"China has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu<blockquote>中国禁止虎牙和斗鱼合并</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138077902","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"The State Administration of market supervision of China has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu.On January 4, 2021, the State Administration of market supervision of the people's Republic of China conducted an anti-monopoly examination on the concentration of business operators in accordance with the law in the merger case of tiger tooth company and Betta International Holding Co., Ltd. declared by Tencent Holding Co., Ltd.Tencent responded that the company will seriously abide by the review","content":"<p>The State Administration of market supervision of China has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu.</p><p><blockquote>中国国家市场监督管理总局已经禁止虎牙和斗鱼合并。</blockquote></p><p> On January 4, 2021, the State Administration of market supervision of the people's Republic of China conducted an anti-monopoly examination on the concentration of business operators in accordance with the law in the merger case of tiger tooth company and Betta International Holding Co., Ltd. declared by Tencent Holding Co., Ltd.</p><p><blockquote>2021年1月4日,国家市场监督管理总局对腾讯控股控股有限公司申报的虎牙公司与斗鱼国际控股有限公司合并一案,依法进行了经营者集中反垄断审查。</blockquote></p><p> According to the anti monopoly law, the State Administration of market supervision comprehensively analyzes and evaluates the market share of the operators participating in the concentration in the relevant market and their control over the market, the degree of market concentration, the impact of concentration on market entry and technological progress, the impact of concentration on consumers and other relevant operators, as well as the effectiveness of the additional restrictive commitment scheme proposed by Tencent. During the review process, the State Administration of market supervision extensively solicited opinions from relevant government departments, industry associations, experts and scholars, competitors in the same industry and downstream customers, and listened to Tencent's opinions for many times.</p><p><blockquote>国家市场监督管理总局根据《反垄断法》,综合分析评价参与集中的经营者在相关市场的市场份额及其对市场的控制力、市场集中程度、集中对市场进入和技术进步的影响、集中对消费者和其他相关经营者的影响,以及腾讯控股提出的附加限制性承诺方案的有效性。在审查过程中,市场监管总局广泛征求了相关政府部门、行业协会、专家学者、同行业竞争对手和下游客户的意见,多次听取了腾讯方面的意见。</blockquote></p><p> The review shows that the relevant market of this case is the online game operation service market and the live game market in China. Tencent's market share in the upstream online game operation service exceeds 40%, ranking first; Tiger teeth and fighting fish have more than 40% and 30% of the downstream live game market shares respectively, ranking first and second, with a total of more than 70%. At present, Tencent has separate control over tiger tooth and joint control over Betta. For example, the merger of tiger tooth and Betta will make Tencent control the merged entity separately, further strengthen Tencent's dominant position in the live game market, and enable Tencent to have the ability and motivation to implement closed-loop management and two-way vertical blockade in the upstream and downstream markets, which has or may have the effect of excluding and limiting competition, which is not conducive to fair competition in the market and may damage the interests of consumers, It is not conducive to the healthy and sustainable development of online games and live game market. After evaluation, Tencent's proposal of additional restrictive conditions commitment can not effectively solve the above competition concerns.</p><p><blockquote>审查显示,本案涉案市场为我国网络游戏运营服务市场和直播游戏市场。腾讯在上游网络游戏运营服务市场份额超过40%,排名第一;虎牙和斗鱼分别占据了下游直播游戏市场份额的40%和30%以上,分列第一和第二位,合计超过70%。目前,腾讯控股对虎牙实行单独管控,对斗鱼实行联合管控。如虎牙与斗鱼合并将使腾讯控股单独控制合并后的实体,进一步强化腾讯在直播游戏市场的主导地位,使腾讯控股有能力和动力在上下游市场实施闭环管理和双向垂直封锁,具有或可能具有排除和限制竞争的效果,不利于市场的公平竞争,可能损害消费者的利益,不利于网络游戏和直播游戏市场的健康可持续发展。经评估,腾讯提出的附加限制性条件承诺不能有效解决上述竞争担忧。</blockquote></p><p> According to Article 28 of the anti monopoly law and Article 35 of the Interim Provisions on the examination of business concentration, the State Administration of market supervision has decided to prohibit such business concentration according to law.</p><p><blockquote>根据《反垄断法》第二十八条和《经营者集中审查暂行规定》第三十五条的规定,市场监管总局决定依法禁止此类经营者集中。</blockquote></p><p> Tencent responded that the company will seriously abide by the review decision, actively cooperate with regulatory requirements, operate in accordance with the law and fulfill its social responsibilities.</p><p><blockquote>腾讯控股回应称,公司将认真遵守审查决定,积极配合监管要求,依法经营,履行社会责任。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu<blockquote>中国禁止虎牙和斗鱼合并</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu<blockquote>中国禁止虎牙和斗鱼合并</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-10 10:12</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The State Administration of market supervision of China has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu.</p><p><blockquote>中国国家市场监督管理总局已经禁止虎牙和斗鱼合并。</blockquote></p><p> On January 4, 2021, the State Administration of market supervision of the people's Republic of China conducted an anti-monopoly examination on the concentration of business operators in accordance with the law in the merger case of tiger tooth company and Betta International Holding Co., Ltd. declared by Tencent Holding Co., Ltd.</p><p><blockquote>2021年1月4日,国家市场监督管理总局对腾讯控股控股有限公司申报的虎牙公司与斗鱼国际控股有限公司合并一案,依法进行了经营者集中反垄断审查。</blockquote></p><p> According to the anti monopoly law, the State Administration of market supervision comprehensively analyzes and evaluates the market share of the operators participating in the concentration in the relevant market and their control over the market, the degree of market concentration, the impact of concentration on market entry and technological progress, the impact of concentration on consumers and other relevant operators, as well as the effectiveness of the additional restrictive commitment scheme proposed by Tencent. During the review process, the State Administration of market supervision extensively solicited opinions from relevant government departments, industry associations, experts and scholars, competitors in the same industry and downstream customers, and listened to Tencent's opinions for many times.</p><p><blockquote>国家市场监督管理总局根据《反垄断法》,综合分析评价参与集中的经营者在相关市场的市场份额及其对市场的控制力、市场集中程度、集中对市场进入和技术进步的影响、集中对消费者和其他相关经营者的影响,以及腾讯控股提出的附加限制性承诺方案的有效性。在审查过程中,市场监管总局广泛征求了相关政府部门、行业协会、专家学者、同行业竞争对手和下游客户的意见,多次听取了腾讯方面的意见。</blockquote></p><p> The review shows that the relevant market of this case is the online game operation service market and the live game market in China. Tencent's market share in the upstream online game operation service exceeds 40%, ranking first; Tiger teeth and fighting fish have more than 40% and 30% of the downstream live game market shares respectively, ranking first and second, with a total of more than 70%. At present, Tencent has separate control over tiger tooth and joint control over Betta. For example, the merger of tiger tooth and Betta will make Tencent control the merged entity separately, further strengthen Tencent's dominant position in the live game market, and enable Tencent to have the ability and motivation to implement closed-loop management and two-way vertical blockade in the upstream and downstream markets, which has or may have the effect of excluding and limiting competition, which is not conducive to fair competition in the market and may damage the interests of consumers, It is not conducive to the healthy and sustainable development of online games and live game market. After evaluation, Tencent's proposal of additional restrictive conditions commitment can not effectively solve the above competition concerns.</p><p><blockquote>审查显示,本案涉案市场为我国网络游戏运营服务市场和直播游戏市场。腾讯在上游网络游戏运营服务市场份额超过40%,排名第一;虎牙和斗鱼分别占据了下游直播游戏市场份额的40%和30%以上,分列第一和第二位,合计超过70%。目前,腾讯控股对虎牙实行单独管控,对斗鱼实行联合管控。如虎牙与斗鱼合并将使腾讯控股单独控制合并后的实体,进一步强化腾讯在直播游戏市场的主导地位,使腾讯控股有能力和动力在上下游市场实施闭环管理和双向垂直封锁,具有或可能具有排除和限制竞争的效果,不利于市场的公平竞争,可能损害消费者的利益,不利于网络游戏和直播游戏市场的健康可持续发展。经评估,腾讯提出的附加限制性条件承诺不能有效解决上述竞争担忧。</blockquote></p><p> According to Article 28 of the anti monopoly law and Article 35 of the Interim Provisions on the examination of business concentration, the State Administration of market supervision has decided to prohibit such business concentration according to law.</p><p><blockquote>根据《反垄断法》第二十八条和《经营者集中审查暂行规定》第三十五条的规定,市场监管总局决定依法禁止此类经营者集中。</blockquote></p><p> Tencent responded that the company will seriously abide by the review decision, actively cooperate with regulatory requirements, operate in accordance with the law and fulfill its social responsibilities.</p><p><blockquote>腾讯控股回应称,公司将认真遵守审查决定,积极配合监管要求,依法经营,履行社会责任。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DOYU":"斗鱼","HUYA":"虎牙","00700":"腾讯控股"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138077902","content_text":"The State Administration of market supervision of China has prohibited the merger of HuYa and DouYu.\nOn January 4, 2021, the State Administration of market supervision of the people's Republic of China conducted an anti-monopoly examination on the concentration of business operators in accordance with the law in the merger case of tiger tooth company and Betta International Holding Co., Ltd. declared by Tencent Holding Co., Ltd.\nAccording to the anti monopoly law, the State Administration of market supervision comprehensively analyzes and evaluates the market share of the operators participating in the concentration in the relevant market and their control over the market, the degree of market concentration, the impact of concentration on market entry and technological progress, the impact of concentration on consumers and other relevant operators, as well as the effectiveness of the additional restrictive commitment scheme proposed by Tencent. During the review process, the State Administration of market supervision extensively solicited opinions from relevant government departments, industry associations, experts and scholars, competitors in the same industry and downstream customers, and listened to Tencent's opinions for many times.\nThe review shows that the relevant market of this case is the online game operation service market and the live game market in China. Tencent's market share in the upstream online game operation service exceeds 40%, ranking first; Tiger teeth and fighting fish have more than 40% and 30% of the downstream live game market shares respectively, ranking first and second, with a total of more than 70%. At present, Tencent has separate control over tiger tooth and joint control over Betta. For example, the merger of tiger tooth and Betta will make Tencent control the merged entity separately, further strengthen Tencent's dominant position in the live game market, and enable Tencent to have the ability and motivation to implement closed-loop management and two-way vertical blockade in the upstream and downstream markets, which has or may have the effect of excluding and limiting competition, which is not conducive to fair competition in the market and may damage the interests of consumers, It is not conducive to the healthy and sustainable development of online games and live game market. After evaluation, Tencent's proposal of additional restrictive conditions commitment can not effectively solve the above competition concerns.\nAccording to Article 28 of the anti monopoly law and Article 35 of the Interim Provisions on the examination of business concentration, the State Administration of market supervision has decided to prohibit such business concentration according to law.\nTencent responded that the company will seriously abide by the review decision, actively cooperate with regulatory requirements, operate in accordance with the law and fulfill its social responsibilities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DOYU":0.9,"HUYA":0.9,"00700":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":853,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140868127,"gmtCreate":1625646825069,"gmtModify":1633938755034,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Xpev","listText":"Xpev","text":"Xpev","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140868127","repostId":"1131738801","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131738801","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1625645247,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1131738801?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-07 16:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"XPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价在盘前交易中下跌 3%。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131738801","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"XPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.\nShares of Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Inc trade ","content":"<p>XPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote>小鹏汽车股价在盘前交易中下跌 3%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bfcb0a6ca8a7d5337dcf5cc5e4831321\" tg-width=\"1284\" tg-height=\"619\">Shares of Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Inc trade as low as HK$159.30, down 3.5% from the offer price of HK$165 apiece in the company's dual primary listing debut in Hong Kong.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商小鹏汽车(Xpeng Inc.)的股价最低为159.30港元,较该公司在香港首次双重主要上市时每股165港元的发售价下跌3.5%。</blockquote></p><p> Xpeng, which on Wednesday raised $1.8 bln by selling 85 mln shares in Hong Kong listing, will develop future models based on product platforms designed for international markets, its chief executive said</p><p><blockquote>小鹏汽车首席执行官表示,该公司周三在香港上市,出售 8500 万股股票,筹集了 18 亿美元,将基于专为国际市场设计的产品平台开发未来车型</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>XPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价在盘前交易中下跌 3%。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.<blockquote>小鹏汽车股价在盘前交易中下跌 3%。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-07 16:07</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>XPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote>小鹏汽车股价在盘前交易中下跌 3%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bfcb0a6ca8a7d5337dcf5cc5e4831321\" tg-width=\"1284\" tg-height=\"619\">Shares of Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Inc trade as low as HK$159.30, down 3.5% from the offer price of HK$165 apiece in the company's dual primary listing debut in Hong Kong.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商小鹏汽车(Xpeng Inc.)的股价最低为159.30港元,较该公司在香港首次双重主要上市时每股165港元的发售价下跌3.5%。</blockquote></p><p> Xpeng, which on Wednesday raised $1.8 bln by selling 85 mln shares in Hong Kong listing, will develop future models based on product platforms designed for international markets, its chief executive said</p><p><blockquote>小鹏汽车首席执行官表示,该公司周三在香港上市,出售 8500 万股股票,筹集了 18 亿美元,将基于专为国际市场设计的产品平台开发未来车型</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏集团"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131738801","content_text":"XPeng shares fell 3% in premarket trading.\nShares of Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Inc trade as low as HK$159.30, down 3.5% from the offer price of HK$165 apiece in the company's dual primary listing debut in Hong Kong.\nXpeng, which on Wednesday raised $1.8 bln by selling 85 mln shares in Hong Kong listing, will develop future models based on product platforms designed for international markets, its chief executive said","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XPEV":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":762,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154434845,"gmtCreate":1625538067587,"gmtModify":1633939853620,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Flat","listText":"Flat","text":"Flat","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/154434845","repostId":"1116255026","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":704,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154619943,"gmtCreate":1625523992282,"gmtModify":1633940117587,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"IPO","listText":"IPO","text":"IPO","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/154619943","repostId":"1166963826","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166963826","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625486061,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1166963826?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-05 19:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO This Week: Just 2 IPOs scheduled for the shortened holiday week<blockquote>本周美国 IPO:假期周缩短期间仅安排 2 次 IPO</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166963826","media":"renaissancecap...","summary":"Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holida","content":"<p>Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holiday with just two IPOs scheduled for the shortened week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在经历了十多年来最繁忙的一周后,美国 IPO 市场正在假期后喘口气,缩短的一周内只有两次 IPO 计划进行。</blockquote></p><p> While the calendar is quiet at the moment, several companies are primed to launch, including luxury social club <b>Membership Collective Group</b>(MCG), Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise <b>F45 Training</b>(FXLV), database provider <b>Couchbase</b>(BASE), and consumer banking platform<b>BlendLabs</b>(BLND).</p><p><blockquote>虽然目前日历很安静,但包括豪华社交俱乐部在内的几家公司正准备推出<b>会员资格集体组</b>(MCG),沃尔伯格支持的健身特许经营权<b>F45训练</b>(FXLV),数据库提供商<b>沙发底座</b>(基地)和消费银行平台<b>混合实验室</b>(BLND)。</blockquote></p><p> Chinese healthcare data company <b>LinkDoc Technology</b>(LDOC) plans to raise $200 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This AI-driven healthcare technology company provides a data platform for patient care and clinical research, specifically within oncology. Unprofitable with strong growth, LinkDoc's platform has cumulatively cared for over 3.5 million patients and provided longitudinal care for over 2.5 million patients since 2015.</p><p><blockquote>中国医疗数据公司<b>LinkDoc技术</b>(LDOC) 计划以 15 亿美元的市值筹集 2 亿美元。这家人工智能驱动的医疗保健技术公司为患者护理和临床研究提供了数据平台,特别是在肿瘤学领域。自2015年以来,LinkDoc的平台已累计护理超过350万名患者,并为超过250万名患者提供纵向护理。</blockquote></p><p> OTC-list <b>Minim</b>(MINM), which provides intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform, has not set terms but plans to begin trading in the week ahead. Minim has developed intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform that powers applications for businesses, service providers, and home users. The company's products can be found in retailers across the US and in over 100 Internet Service Providers broadband offerings.</p><p><blockquote>OTC上市<b>最小</b>(MINM)提供智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,该公司尚未设定条款,但计划在未来一周开始交易。Minim开发了智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,为企业、服务提供商和家庭用户的应用程序提供支持。该公司的产品可以在美国各地的零售商和100多家互联网服务提供商的宽带产品中找到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/003a0748043153c660ff267811776609\" tg-width=\"1421\" tg-height=\"362\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1619493174116","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO This Week: Just 2 IPOs scheduled for the shortened holiday week<blockquote>本周美国 IPO:假期周缩短期间仅安排 2 次 IPO</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO This Week: Just 2 IPOs scheduled for the shortened holiday week<blockquote>本周美国 IPO:假期周缩短期间仅安排 2 次 IPO</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">renaissancecap...</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-05 19:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holiday with just two IPOs scheduled for the shortened week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在经历了十多年来最繁忙的一周后,美国 IPO 市场正在假期后喘口气,缩短的一周内只有两次 IPO 计划进行。</blockquote></p><p> While the calendar is quiet at the moment, several companies are primed to launch, including luxury social club <b>Membership Collective Group</b>(MCG), Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise <b>F45 Training</b>(FXLV), database provider <b>Couchbase</b>(BASE), and consumer banking platform<b>BlendLabs</b>(BLND).</p><p><blockquote>虽然目前日历很安静,但包括豪华社交俱乐部在内的几家公司正准备推出<b>会员资格集体组</b>(MCG),沃尔伯格支持的健身特许经营权<b>F45训练</b>(FXLV),数据库提供商<b>沙发底座</b>(基地)和消费银行平台<b>混合实验室</b>(BLND)。</blockquote></p><p> Chinese healthcare data company <b>LinkDoc Technology</b>(LDOC) plans to raise $200 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This AI-driven healthcare technology company provides a data platform for patient care and clinical research, specifically within oncology. Unprofitable with strong growth, LinkDoc's platform has cumulatively cared for over 3.5 million patients and provided longitudinal care for over 2.5 million patients since 2015.</p><p><blockquote>中国医疗数据公司<b>LinkDoc技术</b>(LDOC) 计划以 15 亿美元的市值筹集 2 亿美元。这家人工智能驱动的医疗保健技术公司为患者护理和临床研究提供了数据平台,特别是在肿瘤学领域。自2015年以来,LinkDoc的平台已累计护理超过350万名患者,并为超过250万名患者提供纵向护理。</blockquote></p><p> OTC-list <b>Minim</b>(MINM), which provides intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform, has not set terms but plans to begin trading in the week ahead. Minim has developed intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform that powers applications for businesses, service providers, and home users. The company's products can be found in retailers across the US and in over 100 Internet Service Providers broadband offerings.</p><p><blockquote>OTC上市<b>最小</b>(MINM)提供智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,该公司尚未设定条款,但计划在未来一周开始交易。Minim开发了智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,为企业、服务提供商和家庭用户的应用程序提供支持。该公司的产品可以在美国各地的零售商和100多家互联网服务提供商的宽带产品中找到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/003a0748043153c660ff267811776609\" tg-width=\"1421\" tg-height=\"362\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83625/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Just-2-IPOs-scheduled-for-the-shortened-holiday-week\">renaissancecap...</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83625/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Just-2-IPOs-scheduled-for-the-shortened-holiday-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166963826","content_text":"Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holiday with just two IPOs scheduled for the shortened week ahead.\nWhile the calendar is quiet at the moment, several companies are primed to launch, including luxury social club Membership Collective Group(MCG), Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise F45 Training(FXLV), database provider Couchbase(BASE), and consumer banking platformBlendLabs(BLND).\nChinese healthcare data company LinkDoc Technology(LDOC) plans to raise $200 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This AI-driven healthcare technology company provides a data platform for patient care and clinical research, specifically within oncology. Unprofitable with strong growth, LinkDoc's platform has cumulatively cared for over 3.5 million patients and provided longitudinal care for over 2.5 million patients since 2015.\nOTC-list Minim(MINM), which provides intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform, has not set terms but plans to begin trading in the week ahead. Minim has developed intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform that powers applications for businesses, service providers, and home users. The company's products can be found in retailers across the US and in over 100 Internet Service Providers broadband offerings.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MINM":0.9,"LDOC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":706,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155433073,"gmtCreate":1625448055292,"gmtModify":1633940626224,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Latest","listText":"Latest","text":"Latest","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/155433073","repostId":"1169840279","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":766,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152892002,"gmtCreate":1625279432206,"gmtModify":1633941818431,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Not all raised","listText":"Not all raised","text":"Not all raised","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/152892002","repostId":"1165340887","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":526,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153783242,"gmtCreate":1625050844686,"gmtModify":1633945457636,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153783242","repostId":"1150186389","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":663,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":154619943,"gmtCreate":1625523992282,"gmtModify":1633940117587,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"IPO","listText":"IPO","text":"IPO","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/154619943","repostId":"1166963826","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166963826","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625486061,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1166963826?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-05 19:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO This Week: Just 2 IPOs scheduled for the shortened holiday week<blockquote>本周美国 IPO:假期周缩短期间仅安排 2 次 IPO</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166963826","media":"renaissancecap...","summary":"Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holida","content":"<p>Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holiday with just two IPOs scheduled for the shortened week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在经历了十多年来最繁忙的一周后,美国 IPO 市场正在假期后喘口气,缩短的一周内只有两次 IPO 计划进行。</blockquote></p><p> While the calendar is quiet at the moment, several companies are primed to launch, including luxury social club <b>Membership Collective Group</b>(MCG), Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise <b>F45 Training</b>(FXLV), database provider <b>Couchbase</b>(BASE), and consumer banking platform<b>BlendLabs</b>(BLND).</p><p><blockquote>虽然目前日历很安静,但包括豪华社交俱乐部在内的几家公司正准备推出<b>会员资格集体组</b>(MCG),沃尔伯格支持的健身特许经营权<b>F45训练</b>(FXLV),数据库提供商<b>沙发底座</b>(基地)和消费银行平台<b>混合实验室</b>(BLND)。</blockquote></p><p> Chinese healthcare data company <b>LinkDoc Technology</b>(LDOC) plans to raise $200 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This AI-driven healthcare technology company provides a data platform for patient care and clinical research, specifically within oncology. Unprofitable with strong growth, LinkDoc's platform has cumulatively cared for over 3.5 million patients and provided longitudinal care for over 2.5 million patients since 2015.</p><p><blockquote>中国医疗数据公司<b>LinkDoc技术</b>(LDOC) 计划以 15 亿美元的市值筹集 2 亿美元。这家人工智能驱动的医疗保健技术公司为患者护理和临床研究提供了数据平台,特别是在肿瘤学领域。自2015年以来,LinkDoc的平台已累计护理超过350万名患者,并为超过250万名患者提供纵向护理。</blockquote></p><p> OTC-list <b>Minim</b>(MINM), which provides intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform, has not set terms but plans to begin trading in the week ahead. Minim has developed intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform that powers applications for businesses, service providers, and home users. The company's products can be found in retailers across the US and in over 100 Internet Service Providers broadband offerings.</p><p><blockquote>OTC上市<b>最小</b>(MINM)提供智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,该公司尚未设定条款,但计划在未来一周开始交易。Minim开发了智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,为企业、服务提供商和家庭用户的应用程序提供支持。该公司的产品可以在美国各地的零售商和100多家互联网服务提供商的宽带产品中找到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/003a0748043153c660ff267811776609\" tg-width=\"1421\" tg-height=\"362\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1619493174116","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO This Week: Just 2 IPOs scheduled for the shortened holiday week<blockquote>本周美国 IPO:假期周缩短期间仅安排 2 次 IPO</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO This Week: Just 2 IPOs scheduled for the shortened holiday week<blockquote>本周美国 IPO:假期周缩短期间仅安排 2 次 IPO</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">renaissancecap...</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-05 19:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holiday with just two IPOs scheduled for the shortened week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在经历了十多年来最繁忙的一周后,美国 IPO 市场正在假期后喘口气,缩短的一周内只有两次 IPO 计划进行。</blockquote></p><p> While the calendar is quiet at the moment, several companies are primed to launch, including luxury social club <b>Membership Collective Group</b>(MCG), Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise <b>F45 Training</b>(FXLV), database provider <b>Couchbase</b>(BASE), and consumer banking platform<b>BlendLabs</b>(BLND).</p><p><blockquote>虽然目前日历很安静,但包括豪华社交俱乐部在内的几家公司正准备推出<b>会员资格集体组</b>(MCG),沃尔伯格支持的健身特许经营权<b>F45训练</b>(FXLV),数据库提供商<b>沙发底座</b>(基地)和消费银行平台<b>混合实验室</b>(BLND)。</blockquote></p><p> Chinese healthcare data company <b>LinkDoc Technology</b>(LDOC) plans to raise $200 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This AI-driven healthcare technology company provides a data platform for patient care and clinical research, specifically within oncology. Unprofitable with strong growth, LinkDoc's platform has cumulatively cared for over 3.5 million patients and provided longitudinal care for over 2.5 million patients since 2015.</p><p><blockquote>中国医疗数据公司<b>LinkDoc技术</b>(LDOC) 计划以 15 亿美元的市值筹集 2 亿美元。这家人工智能驱动的医疗保健技术公司为患者护理和临床研究提供了数据平台,特别是在肿瘤学领域。自2015年以来,LinkDoc的平台已累计护理超过350万名患者,并为超过250万名患者提供纵向护理。</blockquote></p><p> OTC-list <b>Minim</b>(MINM), which provides intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform, has not set terms but plans to begin trading in the week ahead. Minim has developed intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform that powers applications for businesses, service providers, and home users. The company's products can be found in retailers across the US and in over 100 Internet Service Providers broadband offerings.</p><p><blockquote>OTC上市<b>最小</b>(MINM)提供智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,该公司尚未设定条款,但计划在未来一周开始交易。Minim开发了智能网络产品和WiFi作为服务平台,为企业、服务提供商和家庭用户的应用程序提供支持。该公司的产品可以在美国各地的零售商和100多家互联网服务提供商的宽带产品中找到。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/003a0748043153c660ff267811776609\" tg-width=\"1421\" tg-height=\"362\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83625/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Just-2-IPOs-scheduled-for-the-shortened-holiday-week\">renaissancecap...</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/83625/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Just-2-IPOs-scheduled-for-the-shortened-holiday-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166963826","content_text":"Following its busiest week in over a decade, the US IPO market is taking a breather after the holiday with just two IPOs scheduled for the shortened week ahead.\nWhile the calendar is quiet at the moment, several companies are primed to launch, including luxury social club Membership Collective Group(MCG), Wahlberg-backed fitness franchise F45 Training(FXLV), database provider Couchbase(BASE), and consumer banking platformBlendLabs(BLND).\nChinese healthcare data company LinkDoc Technology(LDOC) plans to raise $200 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This AI-driven healthcare technology company provides a data platform for patient care and clinical research, specifically within oncology. Unprofitable with strong growth, LinkDoc's platform has cumulatively cared for over 3.5 million patients and provided longitudinal care for over 2.5 million patients since 2015.\nOTC-list Minim(MINM), which provides intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform, has not set terms but plans to begin trading in the week ahead. Minim has developed intelligent networking products and a WiFi as a Service platform that powers applications for businesses, service providers, and home users. The company's products can be found in retailers across the US and in over 100 Internet Service Providers broadband offerings.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MINM":0.9,"LDOC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":706,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148629169,"gmtCreate":1625972581951,"gmtModify":1633931220614,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148629169","repostId":"1112201050","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112201050","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625966101,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1112201050?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-11 09:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112201050","media":"Barrons","summary":"It seemed to be only a matter of time.\nWhen GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the de","content":"<p>It seemed to be only a matter of time.</p><p><blockquote>这似乎只是时间问题。</blockquote></p><p> When GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?</p><p><blockquote>当游戏驿站(股票代码:GME)、黑莓(BB),甚至百视达的干涸尸体在一月份突然复活时,它们何时会再次坠毁的时间已经在流逝。会是几个小时、几天还是几周?</blockquote></p><p> It has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.</p><p><blockquote>现在已经过去半年了,核心 “备忘录股票 ”的交易价格仍然处于研究这些股票多年的人认为离谱的水平。Clover Health Investments (CLOV) 和 Newegg Commerce (NEGG) 等新名称最近出现在留言板上,它们的股票也随之上涨。</blockquote></p><p> The collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.</p><p><blockquote>数百万散户交易员--长期以来被嘲笑为 “哑巴钱 ”--的集体努力成功地让股市飙升,并迫使反对者投降。</blockquote></p><p> That is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.</p><p><blockquote>尽管他们押注的公司几乎没有表现出业务转型的迹象,也没有表现出足以证明其估值的利润,但情况确实如此。黑莓在最近一个季度烧钱,并警告称其关键的网络安全部门将达到收入指导的低端;消息传出后,该股下跌,但在过去一年中仍上涨了一倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大型经纪商的交易量较 2 月份的峰值略有下降,但仍高于疫情爆发前的两到三倍。数量惊人的这种活动发生在散户交易者青睐的股票中。例如,AMC院线控股公司(AMC)6 月份的日均交易额达到 131 亿美元,超过了苹果(AAPL)的 95 亿美元和亚马逊(AMZN)的 103 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.</p><p><blockquote>即使冠状病毒在美国消退,大多数新交易者表示,他们仍然致力于他们在封锁期间学到的爱好——在一项Betterment调查中,58%的日内交易者表示,他们计划在未来进行更多的交易,只有12%的人计划减少交易。业余疫情面包师已经停止揉捏酸面团面包;交易者只会变得越来越饥饿。</blockquote></p><p> A sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.</p><p><blockquote>持续的熊市会破坏这种食欲,就像互联网泡沫破裂时一样。目前,下跌是持有或买入的理由。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25a79e71371c165f9a3a5085931fc487\" tg-width=\"979\" tg-height=\"649\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to Barron’s.</p><p><blockquote>“美国海军电子技术员布兰登-卢切克(Brandon Luczek)在给《巴伦周刊》的一封电子邮件中写道:”我看到'逢低买入'的情绪一刻也没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> The meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票飙升是由散户投资者交易的增加推动的。2020年,在线经纪商以创纪录的速度签约客户,超过1000万人开设了新账户。这一记录几乎肯定会在2021年被打破。一些顶级公司透露,在今年不到一半的时间里,经纪商已经增加了超过 1000 万个账户。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.</p><p><blockquote>模因股票既是这种现象的推车,也是马。他们的价格突然飙升是由新投资者推动的,然后这一行动推动更多的新人投资。数百万人在 1 月底和 2 月初下载了投资应用程序,只是为了享受乐趣。嘉信理财(SCHW)最近的一项调查发现,15%的现有交易者在2020年后开始投资。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/167386c6881a258922ad62caaf7a05f4\" tg-width=\"971\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e29e3041b91070252ab9063d1a11fa2\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"642\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9cc1c0bd6368721c0eca87e25719f16\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"641\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.</p><p><blockquote>激增中最突出的参与者是 Robinhood,该公司表示仅在第一季度就增加了 550 万个资金账户。但它并不孤单。例如,富达宣布,第一季度吸引了 160 万 35 岁以下的新客户,比去年同期增长了 223%。</blockquote></p><p> Under pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>在 Robinhood 零佣金模式的压力下,所有主要经纪商都在 2019 年将佣金降至零。这为新客户群体打开了闸门——他们可能没有那么多闲置现金进行交易,但比前辈更加活跃和多样化。经纪人正在套现。富达希望在投资者获得驾照之前就吸引他们,允许年仅 13 岁的儿童开设交易账户。Robinhood 正在乘势而上进行首次公开募股,分析师预计其估值将超过其收入的 10 倍。</blockquote></p><p> These new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”</p><p><blockquote>这些新客户的行为与他们的老同行不同。E*Trade 交易主管克里斯-拉金(Chris Larkin)说,多年来,“ETF 一直备受青睐”,E*Trade 现归摩根士丹利(MS)所有。但挑选个股显然是 “2021 年的大新闻”。</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是,随着世界各地的投资者押注疫情复苏并避免疲软的债券收益率,股票交易所交易基金仍然表现良好。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.</p><p><blockquote>但 ETF 不像股票那样点亮留言板。这并不是说顶级公司的单行道。游戏驿站二月份确实下跌,华尔街享受了幸灾乐祸的时刻。它并没有持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> “Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.</p><p><blockquote>“盈透证券(Interactive Brokers)首席策略师史蒂夫-索斯尼克(Steve Sosnick)写道:”就像蝉一样,备忘录交易者在表面上隐匿了几个月后又重新活跃起来。索斯尼克认为,模因股票的交易往往与加密货币相反,因为随着势头的变化,它们的粉丝会从一种货币转向另一种货币。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道:”我不认为,在比特币和其他加密货币大幅回调后,备忘录股票卷土重来完全是巧合。</blockquote></p><p> Sosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.</p><p><blockquote>索斯尼克认为备忘录股票是一个 “独立的板块”,他在电脑显示器上将其与其他股票代码分开。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.</p><p><blockquote>事实上,华尔街对备忘录股票革命的反应一直是孤立专业人士认为不理性的市场部分。大多数卖空者不会碰这些股票,分析师也在放弃报道。</blockquote></p><p> But Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.</p><p><blockquote>但华尔街不能像蝉一样把零售大军赶走,也不能指望它们在未来 17 年内消失。股票交易已经发生了永久性的变化。今年,零售活动占股本量的 24%,高于 2019 年的 15%。新信条的追随者不是愿意让华尔街管理市场的被动观察者。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/710e642d3b685b74f8c9dcaf46ef3e0b\" tg-width=\"968\" tg-height=\"643\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”</p><p><blockquote>“哥伦比亚法学院(Columbia Law School)专门研究证券市场的教授约书亚-米茨(Joshua Mitts)说:”这实际上反映了我们所看到的趋势的逆转,即与个别公司的接触越来越少。“技术正在拉近普通投资者与他或她所投资的公司的距离,而这只是以新的、不可预测的形式出现。”</blockquote></p><p> The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.</p><p><blockquote>你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> — Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube</p><p><blockquote>— Matt Kohrs,26 岁,每天在 YouTube 上直播股票分析</blockquote></p><p> It is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.</p><p><blockquote>它现在正在改变那些早早加入的人的生活,并且仍然在更高的名字上。</blockquote></p><p> Take Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming stock analysis on YouTube for seven hours a day.</p><p><blockquote>以马特·科尔斯为例,他很早就投资了AMC院线。今年2月,他辞去了纽约程序员的工作,搬到了费城,并开始在YouTube上每天7个小时直播股票分析。</blockquote></p><p> With 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.</p><p><blockquote>YouTube 拥有 35 万粉丝,它正在支付账单。科尔斯说,凭借广告和股票的收入,他可以拿到与以前大致相同的工资。但他也知道,像这样依赖股票收益与朝九晚五的工作完全不同。</blockquote></p><p> “The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> Companies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.</p><p><blockquote>公司也开始做出更积极的反应。他们要么拥抱他们的新主人,要么付钱给迷因学家来理解新华尔街充满表情符号的语言,这样他们就可以阻止他们或安抚他们。</blockquote></p><p> AMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 甚至在上周取消了一项拟议的股权融资,因为该公司显然不喜欢 Reddit 人群的反响。过去一年,AMC 的股票数量已经增加了五倍。首席执行官亚当-阿伦(Adam Aron)在推特上表示,他看到了 “许多人赞成,许多人反对 ”对他增发 2500 万股股票的提议的反应,因此该提议将被取消,而不是在本月晚些时候的 AMC 年会上进行表决。该公司没有回答有关如何调查股东的问题。</blockquote></p><p> Forget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.</p><p><blockquote>忘了会议室吧。公司政策现在正在聊天室里决定。</blockquote></p><p> Big investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.</p><p><blockquote>大投资者正在花费更多时间跟踪社交媒体上有关股票的讨论。美国银行在今年的一项调查中发现,大约25%的机构已经在跟踪社交媒体情绪,但大约40%的机构有兴趣在未来使用它。</blockquote></p><p> In the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几个月里,美国银行、摩根士丹利和摩根大通都发布了关于如何围绕零售行动进行交易的报告,得出了有些不同的结论。</blockquote></p><p> There can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.</p><p><blockquote>正如摩根士丹利所说,信号中可能存在 “阿尔法”,但要实现这一目标可能需要一些紧张的数字运算。当然,并不是所有的留言板聊天都会导致价格持续上涨,如果没有大量的数据分析,零售订单流很难与机构流分开。对于拥有工具来确定散户投资者正在购买哪些股票和正在出售哪些股票的投资者来说,摩根大通建议做多买入兴趣最高的 20% 的股票,做空卖出兴趣最高的 20% 的股票。</blockquote></p><p> For now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>提供跟踪社交媒体情绪产品的另类数据公司Thinknum的鲍里斯·斯皮瓦克(Boris Spiwak)表示,目前,许多购买社交媒体情绪数据的机构似乎都在试图降低风险,而不是寻找新的机会。“他说:”他们认为这几乎就像一份保险,以限制他们的下行风险。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.</p><p><blockquote>对于零售商来说,这种方法并不总是科学的。这一行动是由社区精神支撑的。其背后的力量既是情感上的,也是道德上的,也是经济上的。</blockquote></p><p> New investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>新投资者表示,他们的动机是希望证明自己,并像利润一样惩罚保守派。他们互相学习市场,有时会放大或揭穿关于华尔街的阴谋论。一些人将模因股票运动与2008年金融危机引发的对大型金融机构的持续不信任联系起来。</blockquote></p><p> “Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”</p><p><blockquote>“26 岁的科尔斯说:”华尔街让我们的经济陷入困境,但没有人因此惹上麻烦。“所以,我认为他们认为我们不仅可以赚钱,还可以让华尔街的这些对冲基金付钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Claire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”</p><p><blockquote>克莱尔·赫希伯格 (Claire Hirschberg) 是一名 28 岁的工会组织者,她在 1 月份从朋友那里听说 Robinhood 上购买了价值约 50 美元的游戏驿站股票。她喜欢这个想法,但真正让她兴奋的是她父亲的反应,他是一名长期的资金经理。“她笑着说:”他很生气我买了游戏驿站,还不肯卖。“这让我想永远拿着它。”</blockquote></p><p> Just like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.</p><p><blockquote>就像老华尔街有仪式和准则一样,新华尔街也有。一位新的投资银行员工很快就会知道,在你成为合伙人之前,你不会打菲拉格慕领带。在总经理离开之前,你从不离开办公室,你也不会抱怨工作时间。坏人是监管者和参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦,而且不是按顺序。</blockquote></p><p> The new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.</p><p><blockquote>新的交易台——数百万散户交易者现在使用的应用程序和他们聚集的留言板——也有潜规则。公开承认财务损失是一种勇敢的行为,是内部坚韧和对本集团信念的证明。你不把自己当回事,也不规范语言。你是 “猿类 ”或 “弱智 ”大军的一员。你坚持住,即使这意味着你可能会失去一切。坏人依次是卖空者、做市商和华尔街精英。</blockquote></p><p> The group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>集体行动不仅仅是为了精神支持。交易策略取决于人们保持买入压力,迫使做空,或买入看涨期权,从而引发所谓的伽马挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75d79c78a14cc8f297e17397cc54bdb5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Keith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>基思·吉尔 (Keith Gill) 在二月份众议院金融服务委员会听证会上虚拟露面,成为 Reddit 散户交易员大军推高游戏驿站股价的代言人。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Many short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.</p><p><blockquote>许多卖空者表示,他们不会再碰这些股票了。但显然,其他人并没有采纳这一建议,而是通过反复做空股票来给备忘录运动注入氧气。6 月中旬,AMC 的空头权益占该股流通量的 17%,低于 1 月份的 28%,但降幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> As the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”</p><p><blockquote>随着价格上涨,空头们也控制不住自己。多年来一直关注游戏驿站的韦德布什证券分析师迈克尔-帕切特(Michael Pachter)说,他们开始 “流口水,耳朵里冒出火焰”。“他说:”让我感到震惊的是精神错乱的定义,就是一遍又一遍地做同样的事情,每次都希望有不同的结果,而空头却不断出现。“[游戏驿站公牛]基思-吉尔(Keith Gill)和他的 Reddit raiders 一直在挤压他们,而且一直在起作用。”</blockquote></p><p> To beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.</p><p><blockquote>为了击败卖空者,Reddit 人群需要团结起来,但该社区有时会出现裂缝。拥有最坚定粉丝群的两只模因股票——游戏驿站和 AMC——仍然拥有庞大的核心信徒大军,他们似乎不容易动摇。但其他名字似乎有更善变的支持者。几只陷入迷因疯狂的股票已经崩溃。 Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) 在 1 月底和 6 月初两次飙升,但现在的交易价格仅略高于 1 月中旬的水平。在上涨期间买入的人已经赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Distrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.</p><p><blockquote>不信任已经蔓延,一些交易员担心 wallstreetbets——激发游戏驿站狂热的最初 Reddit 留言板——发展如此之快,以至于它已经失去了最初的精神,并可能变得容易受到操纵。有些人搬到了其他留言板,如 r/superstonk,希望能重现老社区的风味。</blockquote></p><p> Travis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.</p><p><blockquote>社交媒体跟踪公司 Hype Equity 的创始人特拉维斯·雷尔 (Travis Rehl) 表示,他试图将可能的操纵者与更有机的投资者情绪区分开来。他说,炒作股权通常由代表网上谈论的公司的公关公司雇佣。现在,他看到了一种不断增长的趋势,即股票突然出现在留言板上,收到积极的聊天,然后消失。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from Barron’s for comment.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”这让人怀疑什么是真正的讨论,什么是某人只想炒作的东西。wallstreetbets 的版主禁止在该平台上操纵市场,Rehl 表示,他们似乎正在努力遏制错误信息。主持人没有回应《巴伦周刊》的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> “If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.</p><p><blockquote>“索斯尼克说:”如果你能制造足够的轰动效应,让一只股票在短时间内上涨 10%、20%,甚至 50%,那么你就有巨大的动力去做这件事。</blockquote></p><p> The Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在关注留言板上的有趣交易。美国证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)和一些国会议员讨论了改变市场规则,目的是增加保护散户交易者的透明度——尽管如果这些变化减缓交易速度或使交易成本更高,也可能激怒零售人群。</blockquote></p><p> Regulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”</p><p><blockquote>监管并不是唯一能遏制这一趋势的因素。fintech Betterment 行为金融和投资副总裁丹·伊根 (Dan Egan) 认为,这种势头可能会在 9 月份耗尽。即使是 “猿猴 ”也有责任。“他说:”孩子们开始重返校园;家长们也可以自由地再次上班了。“那是下一次从房间里抽出氧气的时候了。”</blockquote></p><p> Traditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.</p><p><blockquote>传统投资者可能会倾向于将整个现象视为由封锁和免费政府资金引发的暂时疯狂。但那将是一个错误。如果零佣金经纪和游戏驿站乐趣打破了数百万新投资者开户的障碍,那么只要大多数人用他们并不立即需要的钱下注,这几乎肯定是一件好事。许多新零售商表示,他们正在自学如何交易,并开始分散持股。</blockquote></p><p> In one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何,这是华尔街未来的客户群。</blockquote></p><p> Arizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking research in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.</p><p><blockquote>亚利桑那州立大学教授亨德里克-贝森宾德(Hendrik Bessembinder)在2018年发表了一项开创性的研究,发现“在随机选择的月份随机选择的股票,亏损的可能性大于赚钱的可能性”。简而言之,挑选单只股票并持有集中投资组合往往是一种失败的策略。</blockquote></p><p> Even so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”</p><p><blockquote>即便如此,他还是对新一波交易感到鼓舞。“贝森宾德说:”我欢迎零售交易的增加,欢迎股票市场成为一个广泛参与的地方。“经济学家不能告诉人们他们不应该找点乐子”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Meme Stock Trade Is Far From Over. What Investors Need to Know.<blockquote>模因股票交易远未结束。投资者需要了解的内容。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-11 09:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It seemed to be only a matter of time.</p><p><blockquote>这似乎只是时间问题。</blockquote></p><p> When GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?</p><p><blockquote>当游戏驿站(股票代码:GME)、黑莓(BB),甚至百视达的干涸尸体在一月份突然复活时,它们何时会再次坠毁的时间已经在流逝。会是几个小时、几天还是几周?</blockquote></p><p> It has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.</p><p><blockquote>现在已经过去半年了,核心 “备忘录股票 ”的交易价格仍然处于研究这些股票多年的人认为离谱的水平。Clover Health Investments (CLOV) 和 Newegg Commerce (NEGG) 等新名称最近出现在留言板上,它们的股票也随之上涨。</blockquote></p><p> The collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.</p><p><blockquote>数百万散户交易员--长期以来被嘲笑为 “哑巴钱 ”--的集体努力成功地让股市飙升,并迫使反对者投降。</blockquote></p><p> That is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.</p><p><blockquote>尽管他们押注的公司几乎没有表现出业务转型的迹象,也没有表现出足以证明其估值的利润,但情况确实如此。黑莓在最近一个季度烧钱,并警告称其关键的网络安全部门将达到收入指导的低端;消息传出后,该股下跌,但在过去一年中仍上涨了一倍多。</blockquote></p><p> While trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>虽然大型经纪商的交易量较 2 月份的峰值略有下降,但仍高于疫情爆发前的两到三倍。数量惊人的这种活动发生在散户交易者青睐的股票中。例如,AMC院线控股公司(AMC)6 月份的日均交易额达到 131 亿美元,超过了苹果(AAPL)的 95 亿美元和亚马逊(AMZN)的 103 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.</p><p><blockquote>即使冠状病毒在美国消退,大多数新交易者表示,他们仍然致力于他们在封锁期间学到的爱好——在一项Betterment调查中,58%的日内交易者表示,他们计划在未来进行更多的交易,只有12%的人计划减少交易。业余疫情面包师已经停止揉捏酸面团面包;交易者只会变得越来越饥饿。</blockquote></p><p> A sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.</p><p><blockquote>持续的熊市会破坏这种食欲,就像互联网泡沫破裂时一样。目前,下跌是持有或买入的理由。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25a79e71371c165f9a3a5085931fc487\" tg-width=\"979\" tg-height=\"649\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to Barron’s.</p><p><blockquote>“美国海军电子技术员布兰登-卢切克(Brandon Luczek)在给《巴伦周刊》的一封电子邮件中写道:”我看到'逢低买入'的情绪一刻也没有减弱。</blockquote></p><p> The meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.</p><p><blockquote>迷因股票飙升是由散户投资者交易的增加推动的。2020年,在线经纪商以创纪录的速度签约客户,超过1000万人开设了新账户。这一记录几乎肯定会在2021年被打破。一些顶级公司透露,在今年不到一半的时间里,经纪商已经增加了超过 1000 万个账户。</blockquote></p><p> Meme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.</p><p><blockquote>模因股票既是这种现象的推车,也是马。他们的价格突然飙升是由新投资者推动的,然后这一行动推动更多的新人投资。数百万人在 1 月底和 2 月初下载了投资应用程序,只是为了享受乐趣。嘉信理财(SCHW)最近的一项调查发现,15%的现有交易者在2020年后开始投资。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/167386c6881a258922ad62caaf7a05f4\" tg-width=\"971\" tg-height=\"644\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e29e3041b91070252ab9063d1a11fa2\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"642\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9cc1c0bd6368721c0eca87e25719f16\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"641\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> The most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.</p><p><blockquote>激增中最突出的参与者是 Robinhood,该公司表示仅在第一季度就增加了 550 万个资金账户。但它并不孤单。例如,富达宣布,第一季度吸引了 160 万 35 岁以下的新客户,比去年同期增长了 223%。</blockquote></p><p> Under pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.</p><p><blockquote>在 Robinhood 零佣金模式的压力下,所有主要经纪商都在 2019 年将佣金降至零。这为新客户群体打开了闸门——他们可能没有那么多闲置现金进行交易,但比前辈更加活跃和多样化。经纪人正在套现。富达希望在投资者获得驾照之前就吸引他们,允许年仅 13 岁的儿童开设交易账户。Robinhood 正在乘势而上进行首次公开募股,分析师预计其估值将超过其收入的 10 倍。</blockquote></p><p> These new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”</p><p><blockquote>这些新客户的行为与他们的老同行不同。E*Trade 交易主管克里斯-拉金(Chris Larkin)说,多年来,“ETF 一直备受青睐”,E*Trade 现归摩根士丹利(MS)所有。但挑选个股显然是 “2021 年的大新闻”。</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是,随着世界各地的投资者押注疫情复苏并避免疲软的债券收益率,股票交易所交易基金仍然表现良好。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> But ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.</p><p><blockquote>但 ETF 不像股票那样点亮留言板。这并不是说顶级公司的单行道。游戏驿站二月份确实下跌,华尔街享受了幸灾乐祸的时刻。它并没有持续多久。</blockquote></p><p> “Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.</p><p><blockquote>“盈透证券(Interactive Brokers)首席策略师史蒂夫-索斯尼克(Steve Sosnick)写道:”就像蝉一样,备忘录交易者在表面上隐匿了几个月后又重新活跃起来。索斯尼克认为,模因股票的交易往往与加密货币相反,因为随着势头的变化,它们的粉丝会从一种货币转向另一种货币。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道:”我不认为,在比特币和其他加密货币大幅回调后,备忘录股票卷土重来完全是巧合。</blockquote></p><p> Sosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.</p><p><blockquote>索斯尼克认为备忘录股票是一个 “独立的板块”,他在电脑显示器上将其与其他股票代码分开。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.</p><p><blockquote>事实上,华尔街对备忘录股票革命的反应一直是孤立专业人士认为不理性的市场部分。大多数卖空者不会碰这些股票,分析师也在放弃报道。</blockquote></p><p> But Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.</p><p><blockquote>但华尔街不能像蝉一样把零售大军赶走,也不能指望它们在未来 17 年内消失。股票交易已经发生了永久性的变化。今年,零售活动占股本量的 24%,高于 2019 年的 15%。新信条的追随者不是愿意让华尔街管理市场的被动观察者。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/710e642d3b685b74f8c9dcaf46ef3e0b\" tg-width=\"968\" tg-height=\"643\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> “What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”</p><p><blockquote>“哥伦比亚法学院(Columbia Law School)专门研究证券市场的教授约书亚-米茨(Joshua Mitts)说:”这实际上反映了我们所看到的趋势的逆转,即与个别公司的接触越来越少。“技术正在拉近普通投资者与他或她所投资的公司的距离,而这只是以新的、不可预测的形式出现。”</blockquote></p><p> The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.</p><p><blockquote>你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> — Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube</p><p><blockquote>— Matt Kohrs,26 岁,每天在 YouTube 上直播股票分析</blockquote></p><p> It is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.</p><p><blockquote>它现在正在改变那些早早加入的人的生活,并且仍然在更高的名字上。</blockquote></p><p> Take Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming stock analysis on YouTube for seven hours a day.</p><p><blockquote>以马特·科尔斯为例,他很早就投资了AMC院线。今年2月,他辞去了纽约程序员的工作,搬到了费城,并开始在YouTube上每天7个小时直播股票分析。</blockquote></p><p> With 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.</p><p><blockquote>YouTube 拥有 35 万粉丝,它正在支付账单。科尔斯说,凭借广告和股票的收入,他可以拿到与以前大致相同的工资。但他也知道,像这样依赖股票收益与朝九晚五的工作完全不同。</blockquote></p><p> “The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”你得到的秋千肯定会让你有某种感觉。</blockquote></p><p> Companies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.</p><p><blockquote>公司也开始做出更积极的反应。他们要么拥抱他们的新主人,要么付钱给迷因学家来理解新华尔街充满表情符号的语言,这样他们就可以阻止他们或安抚他们。</blockquote></p><p> AMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>AMC 甚至在上周取消了一项拟议的股权融资,因为该公司显然不喜欢 Reddit 人群的反响。过去一年,AMC 的股票数量已经增加了五倍。首席执行官亚当-阿伦(Adam Aron)在推特上表示,他看到了 “许多人赞成,许多人反对 ”对他增发 2500 万股股票的提议的反应,因此该提议将被取消,而不是在本月晚些时候的 AMC 年会上进行表决。该公司没有回答有关如何调查股东的问题。</blockquote></p><p> Forget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.</p><p><blockquote>忘了会议室吧。公司政策现在正在聊天室里决定。</blockquote></p><p> Big investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.</p><p><blockquote>大投资者正在花费更多时间跟踪社交媒体上有关股票的讨论。美国银行在今年的一项调查中发现,大约25%的机构已经在跟踪社交媒体情绪,但大约40%的机构有兴趣在未来使用它。</blockquote></p><p> In the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几个月里,美国银行、摩根士丹利和摩根大通都发布了关于如何围绕零售行动进行交易的报告,得出了有些不同的结论。</blockquote></p><p> There can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.</p><p><blockquote>正如摩根士丹利所说,信号中可能存在 “阿尔法”,但要实现这一目标可能需要一些紧张的数字运算。当然,并不是所有的留言板聊天都会导致价格持续上涨,如果没有大量的数据分析,零售订单流很难与机构流分开。对于拥有工具来确定散户投资者正在购买哪些股票和正在出售哪些股票的投资者来说,摩根大通建议做多买入兴趣最高的 20% 的股票,做空卖出兴趣最高的 20% 的股票。</blockquote></p><p> For now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>提供跟踪社交媒体情绪产品的另类数据公司Thinknum的鲍里斯·斯皮瓦克(Boris Spiwak)表示,目前,许多购买社交媒体情绪数据的机构似乎都在试图降低风险,而不是寻找新的机会。“他说:”他们认为这几乎就像一份保险,以限制他们的下行风险。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.</p><p><blockquote>对于零售商来说,这种方法并不总是科学的。这一行动是由社区精神支撑的。其背后的力量既是情感上的,也是道德上的,也是经济上的。</blockquote></p><p> New investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>新投资者表示,他们的动机是希望证明自己,并像利润一样惩罚保守派。他们互相学习市场,有时会放大或揭穿关于华尔街的阴谋论。一些人将模因股票运动与2008年金融危机引发的对大型金融机构的持续不信任联系起来。</blockquote></p><p> “Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”</p><p><blockquote>“26 岁的科尔斯说:”华尔街让我们的经济陷入困境,但没有人因此惹上麻烦。“所以,我认为他们认为我们不仅可以赚钱,还可以让华尔街的这些对冲基金付钱。”</blockquote></p><p> Claire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”</p><p><blockquote>克莱尔·赫希伯格 (Claire Hirschberg) 是一名 28 岁的工会组织者,她在 1 月份从朋友那里听说 Robinhood 上购买了价值约 50 美元的游戏驿站股票。她喜欢这个想法,但真正让她兴奋的是她父亲的反应,他是一名长期的资金经理。“她笑着说:”他很生气我买了游戏驿站,还不肯卖。“这让我想永远拿着它。”</blockquote></p><p> Just like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.</p><p><blockquote>就像老华尔街有仪式和准则一样,新华尔街也有。一位新的投资银行员工很快就会知道,在你成为合伙人之前,你不会打菲拉格慕领带。在总经理离开之前,你从不离开办公室,你也不会抱怨工作时间。坏人是监管者和参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦,而且不是按顺序。</blockquote></p><p> The new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.</p><p><blockquote>新的交易台——数百万散户交易者现在使用的应用程序和他们聚集的留言板——也有潜规则。公开承认财务损失是一种勇敢的行为,是内部坚韧和对本集团信念的证明。你不把自己当回事,也不规范语言。你是 “猿类 ”或 “弱智 ”大军的一员。你坚持住,即使这意味着你可能会失去一切。坏人依次是卖空者、做市商和华尔街精英。</blockquote></p><p> The group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>集体行动不仅仅是为了精神支持。交易策略取决于人们保持买入压力,迫使做空,或买入看涨期权,从而引发所谓的伽马挤压。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75d79c78a14cc8f297e17397cc54bdb5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\"><span>Keith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>基思·吉尔 (Keith Gill) 在二月份众议院金融服务委员会听证会上虚拟露面,成为 Reddit 散户交易员大军推高游戏驿站股价的代言人。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Many short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.</p><p><blockquote>许多卖空者表示,他们不会再碰这些股票了。但显然,其他人并没有采纳这一建议,而是通过反复做空股票来给备忘录运动注入氧气。6 月中旬,AMC 的空头权益占该股流通量的 17%,低于 1 月份的 28%,但降幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> As the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”</p><p><blockquote>随着价格上涨,空头们也控制不住自己。多年来一直关注游戏驿站的韦德布什证券分析师迈克尔-帕切特(Michael Pachter)说,他们开始 “流口水,耳朵里冒出火焰”。“他说:”让我感到震惊的是精神错乱的定义,就是一遍又一遍地做同样的事情,每次都希望有不同的结果,而空头却不断出现。“[游戏驿站公牛]基思-吉尔(Keith Gill)和他的 Reddit raiders 一直在挤压他们,而且一直在起作用。”</blockquote></p><p> To beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.</p><p><blockquote>为了击败卖空者,Reddit 人群需要团结起来,但该社区有时会出现裂缝。拥有最坚定粉丝群的两只模因股票——游戏驿站和 AMC——仍然拥有庞大的核心信徒大军,他们似乎不容易动摇。但其他名字似乎有更善变的支持者。几只陷入迷因疯狂的股票已经崩溃。 Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) 在 1 月底和 6 月初两次飙升,但现在的交易价格仅略高于 1 月中旬的水平。在上涨期间买入的人已经赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Distrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.</p><p><blockquote>不信任已经蔓延,一些交易员担心 wallstreetbets——激发游戏驿站狂热的最初 Reddit 留言板——发展如此之快,以至于它已经失去了最初的精神,并可能变得容易受到操纵。有些人搬到了其他留言板,如 r/superstonk,希望能重现老社区的风味。</blockquote></p><p> Travis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.</p><p><blockquote>社交媒体跟踪公司 Hype Equity 的创始人特拉维斯·雷尔 (Travis Rehl) 表示,他试图将可能的操纵者与更有机的投资者情绪区分开来。他说,炒作股权通常由代表网上谈论的公司的公关公司雇佣。现在,他看到了一种不断增长的趋势,即股票突然出现在留言板上,收到积极的聊天,然后消失。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> “It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from Barron’s for comment.</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”这让人怀疑什么是真正的讨论,什么是某人只想炒作的东西。wallstreetbets 的版主禁止在该平台上操纵市场,Rehl 表示,他们似乎正在努力遏制错误信息。主持人没有回应《巴伦周刊》的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> “If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.</p><p><blockquote>“索斯尼克说:”如果你能制造足够的轰动效应,让一只股票在短时间内上涨 10%、20%,甚至 50%,那么你就有巨大的动力去做这件事。</blockquote></p><p> The Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在关注留言板上的有趣交易。美国证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)和一些国会议员讨论了改变市场规则,目的是增加保护散户交易者的透明度——尽管如果这些变化减缓交易速度或使交易成本更高,也可能激怒零售人群。</blockquote></p><p> Regulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”</p><p><blockquote>监管并不是唯一能遏制这一趋势的因素。fintech Betterment 行为金融和投资副总裁丹·伊根 (Dan Egan) 认为,这种势头可能会在 9 月份耗尽。即使是 “猿猴 ”也有责任。“他说:”孩子们开始重返校园;家长们也可以自由地再次上班了。“那是下一次从房间里抽出氧气的时候了。”</blockquote></p><p> Traditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.</p><p><blockquote>传统投资者可能会倾向于将整个现象视为由封锁和免费政府资金引发的暂时疯狂。但那将是一个错误。如果零佣金经纪和游戏驿站乐趣打破了数百万新投资者开户的障碍,那么只要大多数人用他们并不立即需要的钱下注,这几乎肯定是一件好事。许多新零售商表示,他们正在自学如何交易,并开始分散持股。</blockquote></p><p> In one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何,这是华尔街未来的客户群。</blockquote></p><p> Arizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking research in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.</p><p><blockquote>亚利桑那州立大学教授亨德里克-贝森宾德(Hendrik Bessembinder)在2018年发表了一项开创性的研究,发现“在随机选择的月份随机选择的股票,亏损的可能性大于赚钱的可能性”。简而言之,挑选单只股票并持有集中投资组合往往是一种失败的策略。</blockquote></p><p> Even so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”</p><p><blockquote>即便如此,他还是对新一波交易感到鼓舞。“贝森宾德说:”我欢迎零售交易的增加,欢迎股票市场成为一个广泛参与的地方。“经济学家不能告诉人们他们不应该找点乐子”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-meme-stock-trade-is-far-from-over-what-investors-need-to-know-51625875247?mod=hp_HERO\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SCHW":"嘉信理财","WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp","BB":"黑莓","NEGG":"Newegg Comm Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站","CARV":"卡弗储蓄"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-meme-stock-trade-is-far-from-over-what-investors-need-to-know-51625875247?mod=hp_HERO","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112201050","content_text":"It seemed to be only a matter of time.\nWhen GameStop (ticker: GME), BlackBerry (BB), and even the desiccated carcass of Blockbuster suddenly sprang to life in January, the clock was already ticking for when they would crash again. Would it be hours, days, or weeks?\nIt has now been half a year, and the core “meme stocks” are still trading at levels considered outrageous by people who have studied them for years. New names like Clover Health Investments(CLOV) and Newegg Commerce(NEGG) have recently popped up on message boards, and their stocks have popped, too.\nThe collective efforts of millions of retail traders—long derided as “the dumb money”—have successfully held stocks aloft and forced naysayers to capitulate.\nThat is true even as the companies they are betting on have shown scant signs of transforming their businesses, or turning profits that might justify their valuations. BlackBerry burned cash in its latest quarter and warned that its key cybersecurity division would hit the low end of its revenue guidance; the stock dipped on the news but has still more than doubled in the past year.\nWhile trading volume at the big brokers has come down slightly from its February peak, it remains two to three times as high as it was before the pandemic. And a startling amount of that activity is occurring in stocks favored by retail traders. The average daily value of shares traded in AMC Entertainment Holdings(AMC), for example, reached $13.1 billion in June, more than Apple’s(AAPL) $9.5 billion and Amazon.com’s (AMZN) $10.3 billion.\nEven as the coronavirus fades in the U.S., most new traders say they are committed to the hobby they learned during lockdown—58% of day traders in a Betterment survey said they are planning to trade even more in the future, and only 12% plan to trade less. Amateur pandemic bakers have stopped kneading sourdough loaves; traders are only getting hungrier.\nA sustained bear market would spoil such an appetite, as it did when the dot-com bubble burst. For now, dips are reasons to hold or buy.\n\n“I’ve seen that the ‘buy the dip’ sentiment hasn’t relented for a moment,” wrote Brandon Luczek, an electronics technician for the U.S. Navy who trades with friends online, in an email to Barron’s.\nThe meme stock surge has been propelled by a rise in trading by retail investors. In 2020, online brokers signed clients at a record pace, with more than 10 million people opening new accounts. That record will almost certainly be broken in 2021. Brokers had already added more than 10 million accounts less than halfway into the year, some of the top firms have disclosed.\nMeme stocks are both the cart and the horse of this phenomenon. Their sudden price spikes are driven by new investors, and then that action drives even more new people to invest. Millions of people downloaded investing apps in late January and early February just to be a part of the fun. A recent Charles Schwab(SCHW) survey found that 15% of all current traders began investing after 2020.\n\nThe most prominent player in the surge is Robinhood, which said it had added 5.5 million funded accounts in the first quarter alone. But it isn’t alone. Fidelity, for instance, announced that it had attracted 1.6 million new customers under the age of 35 in the first quarter, 223% more than a year before.\nUnder pressure from Robinhood’s zero-commission model, all of the major brokers cut commissions to zero in 2019. That opened the floodgates to a new group of customers—one that may not have as much spare cash to trade but is more active and diverse than its predecessors. And the brokers are cashing in. Fidelity is hoping to attract investors before they even have driver’s licenses, allowing children as young as 13 to open trading accounts. Robinhood is riding the momentum to an initial public offering that analysts expect to value it at more than 10 times its revenue.\nThese new customers act differently than their older peers. For years, there was a “big gravitation toward ETFs,” says Chris Larkin, head of trading at E*Trade, which is now owned by Morgan Stanley (MS). But picking single stocks is clearly “the big story of 2021.”\nTo be sure, equity exchange-traded funds are still doing well, as investors around the world bet on the pandemic recovery and avoid weak bond yields.\nBut ETFs don’t light up the message boards like stocks do. Not that it has been a one-way ride for the top names. GameStop did dip in February, and Wall Street enjoyed a moment of schadenfreude. It didn’t last.\n“Like cicadas, meme traders returned in a wild blaze of activity after being seemingly underground for several months,” wrote Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick believes that the meme stocks tend to trade inversely to cryptocurrencies, because their fans rotate from one to the other as the momentum shifts.\n“I don’t think it’s strictly a coincidence that meme stocks roared back to life after a significant correction in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” he wrote.\nSosnick considers meme stocks a “sector unto themselves,” one that he segregates on his computer monitor away from other stock tickers.\nIndeed, Wall Street’s reaction to the meme stock revolution has been to isolate the parts of the market that the pros deem irrational. Most short sellers won’t touch the stocks, and analysts are dropping coverage.\nBut Wall Street can’t swat the retail army away like cicadas, or count on them disappearing for the next 17 years. Stock trading has permanently shifted. This year, retail activity accounts for 24% of equity volume, up from 15% in 2019. Adherents to the new creed are not passive observers willing to let Wall Street manage the markets.\n\n“What this really reflects is a reversal of the trends that we saw toward less and less engagement with individual companies,” says Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School specializing in securities markets. “Technology is bringing the average investor closer to the companies in which he or she invests, and that’s just taking on new and unpredictable forms.”\nThe swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way.\n— Matt Kohrs, 26, who streams stock analysis daily on YouTube\nIt is now changing the lives of those who got in early and are still riding the names higher.\nTake Matt Kohrs, who had invested in AMC Entertainment early. He quit his job as a programmer in New York in February, moved to Philadelphia, and started streaming stock analysis on YouTube for seven hours a day.\nWith 350,000 YouTube followers, it’s paying the bills. With his earnings from ads and from the stock, Kohrs says he can pull down roughly the same salary he made before. But he also knows that relying on earnings from stocks like this is nothing like a 9-to-5 job.\n“The swings you get can definitely make you feel some sort of way,” he says.\nCompanies are starting to react more aggressively, too. They are either embracing their new owners or paying meme-ologists to understand the emoji-filled language of the new Wall Street so they can ward them off or appease them.\nAMC even canceled a proposed equity raise this past week because the company apparently didn’t like the vibes it was getting from the Reddit crowd. AMC has already quintupled its share count over the past year. CEO Adam Aron tweeted that he had seen “many yes, many no” reactions to his proposal to issue 25 million more shares, so it will be canceled instead of being presented for a vote at AMC’s annual meeting later this month. The company did not respond to a question on how it had polled shareholders.\nForget the boardroom. Corporate policy is now being determined in the chat room.\nBig investors are spending more time tracking social-media discussions about stocks. Bank of America found in a survey this year that about 25% of institutions had already been tracking social-media sentiment, but that about 40% are interested in using it going forward.\nIn the past few months, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan have all produced reports on how to trade around the retail action, coming to somewhat different conclusions.\nThere can be “alpha in the signal,” as Morgan Stanley put it, but it can take some intense number-crunching to get there. Not all message-board chatter leads to sustained price gains, of course, and retail order flow cannot easily be separated from institutional flow without substantial data analysis. For investors with the tools to pinpoint which stocks retail investors are buying and which they are selling, J.P. Morgan suggests going long on the 20% of stocks with the most buying interest and short on the top 20% in selling interest.\nFor now, many of the institutions buying data on social-media sentiment appear to be trying to reduce their risks, as opposed to scouting new opportunities, according to Boris Spiwak of alternative data firm Thinknum, which offers products that track social-media sentiment. “They see it as almost like an insurance policy, to limit their downside risks,” he says.\nFor retail traders, the method isn’t always scientific. The action is sustained by a community ethos. And the force behind it is as much emotional and moral as financial.\nNew investors say they are motivated by a desire to prove themselves and punish the old guard as much as by profits. They learn from one another about the market, sometimes amplifying or debunking conspiracy theories about Wall Street. Some link the meme-stock movement to continued mistrust of big financial institutions stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.\n“Wall Street brought our economy to its knees, and no one ever got in trouble for it,” says the 26-year-old Kohrs. “So, I think they view this as not only can we make money, but we can also make these hedge funds on Wall Street pay.”\nClaire Hirschberg is a 28-year-old union organizer who bought about $50 worth of GameStop stock on Robinhood in January after hearing about it from friends. She liked the idea, but what really got her excited about it was the reaction of her father, a longtime money manager. “He was so mad I had bought GameStop and was refusing to sell,” she says, laughing. “And that just makes me want to hold it forever.”\nJust like old Wall Street has rituals and codes, the new one does, too. A new investment banking employee learns quickly that you don’t wear a Ferragamo tie until after you make associate. You never leave the office until the managing director does, and you don’t complain about the hours. And the bad guys are the regulators and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and not in that order.\nThe new trading desk—the apps that millions of retail traders now use and the message boards where they congregate—have unspoken rules, too. Publicly acknowledging financial losses is a valiant act, evidence of internal fortitude and belief in the group. You don’t take yourself seriously and you don’t police language. You are part of an army of “apes” or “retards.” You hold through the crashes, even if it means you might lose everything. And the bad guys are the short sellers, the market makers, and the Wall Street elites, in that order.\nThe group action is not just for moral support. The trading strategy depends on people keeping up the buying pressure to force a short squeeze or to buy bullish options that trigger what’s known as a gamma squeeze.\nKeith Gill became the face of the Reddit army of retail traders pushing shares of GameStop higher when he appeared virtually before a House Financial Services Committee hearing in February.\nMany short sellers say they won’t touch these stocks anymore. But clearly, others aren’t taking that advice and are giving the meme movement oxygen by repeatedly betting against the stocks. AMC’s short interest was at 17% of the stock’s float in mid-June, down from 28% in January, but not by much.\nAs the price rises, the shorts can’t help themselves. They start “drooling, with flames coming out of their ears,” says Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst who has covered GameStop for years. “What’s kind of shocked me is the definition of insanity, which is doing the same thing over and over and over again and hoping for a different outcome each time, and the shorts keep coming back,” he says. “And [GameStop bull] Keith Gill and his Reddit raiders keep squeezing them, and it keeps working.”\nTo beat the short sellers, the Reddit crowd needs to hold together, but the community has been showing cracks at times. The two meme stocks with the most determined fan bases—GameStop and AMC—still have enormous armies of core believers who do not seem easily swayed. But other names seem to have more-fickle backers. Several stocks caught up in the meme madness have come crashing down to earth.Bed Bath & Beyond(BBBY) spiked twice—in late January and early June—but now trades only slightly above its mid-January levels. People who bought during the upswings have lost money.\nDistrust has spread, and some traders worry that wallstreetbets— the original Reddit message board that inspired the GameStop frenzy—has grown so fast that it has lost its original spirit, and potentially grown vulnerable to manipulation. Some have moved to other message boards, like r/superstonk, in hopes of reclaiming the old community’s flavor.\nTravis Rehl, the founder of social-media tracking company Hype Equity, says that he tries to separate possible manipulators from more organic investor sentiment. Hype Equity is usually hired by public-relations firms representing companies that are being talked about online, he says. Now, he sees a growing trend of stocks that suddenly come up on message boards, receive positive chatter, and then disappear.\n“It’s called into question what is a true discussion versus what is something that somebody just wants to pump,” he says. The moderators of wallstreetbets forbid market manipulation on the platform, and Rehl say they appear to work hard to police misinformation. The moderators did not respond to a request from Barron’s for comment.\n“If you can create enough buzz to get a stock that goes up 10%, 20%, even 50% in a short period of time, there’s a tremendous incentive to do that,” Sosnick says.\nThe Securities and Exchange Commission is watching for funny business on the message boards. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and some members of Congress have discussed changing market rules with the intention of adding transparency protecting retail traders—although changes could also anger the retail crowd if they slow down trading or make it more expensive.\nRegulations aren’t the only thing that could deflate this trend. Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at fintech Betterment, thinks the momentum may run out of steam in September. Even “apes” have responsibilities. “Kids start going back to schools; parents are free to go to work again,” he says. “That’s the next time there’s going to be some oxygen pulled out of the room.”\nTraditional investors may be tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as temporary madness inspired by lockdowns and free government money. But that would be a mistake. If zero-commission brokerages and fun with GameStop broke down barriers for millions of new investors to open accounts, it’s almost certainly a good thing, as long as most people bet with money they don’t need immediately. Many new retail traders say they are teaching themselves how to trade, and have begun to diversify their holdings.\nIn one form or another, this is the future client base of Wall Street.\nArizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder published groundbreaking research in 2018 that found that “a randomly selected stock in a randomly selected month is more likely to lose money than make money.” In short, picking single stocks and holding a concentrated portfolio tends to be a losing strategy.\nEven so, he’s encouraged by the new wave of trading. “I welcome the increase in retail trading, the idea of the stock market being a place with wide participation,” Bessembinder says. “Economists can’t tell people they shouldn’t get some fun.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9,"CARV":0.9,"WKHS":0.9,"BBBY":0.9,"CLOV":0.9,"BB":0.9,"GME":0.9,"MRIN":0.9,"NEGG":0.9,"SCHW":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":748,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892093356,"gmtCreate":1628608677675,"gmtModify":1633745742756,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Planes","listText":"Planes","text":"Planes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892093356","repostId":"2158772124","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3191,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806794845,"gmtCreate":1627692872087,"gmtModify":1633757112285,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Comment n like","listText":"Comment n like","text":"Comment n like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806794845","repostId":"1138566016","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138566016","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627689251,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1138566016?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金活动家的开放季节。基金持有人如何赢得和失败</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138566016","media":"Barron's","summary":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasensta","content":"<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>邓普顿全球收益基金多年来一直让投资者感到沮丧。尽管明星经理迈克尔·哈森斯塔布 (Michael Hasenstab) 掌舵,但该封闭式基金在过去十年中的平均年回报率为 0.3%,而全球同行的平均年回报率为 7%。同样令人沮丧的是,该基金的股票交易很少接近基金的标的资产净值(NAV)。过去三年平均折扣为11%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.</p><p><blockquote>然而,多亏了激进投资者博阿兹·韦恩斯坦 (Boaz Weinstein) 经营的对冲基金公司 Saba Capital Management,投资者才得以突破。萨巴持有邓普顿基金 20% 的股份,最近赢得了四个有争议的董事会席位。它一直在向董事会施压,要求其采取行动提高股价。其举措取得了成效:随着股价上涨,该基金今年的总回报率为 4.5%,资产净值折扣已缩小至 4%。</blockquote></p><p> Tactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.</p><p><blockquote>像萨巴这样的策略长期以来一直激怒着共同基金公司;没有人希望对冲基金发动政变。现在,由于众议院最近提出的一项法案,在国会的帮助下,竞争环境可能会向封闭式基金及其公司赞助商倾斜。这可能会损害基金投资者的利益。</blockquote></p><p> The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.</p><p><blockquote>众议员安东尼·冈萨雷斯(俄亥俄州共和党)和众议员格雷戈里·米克斯(纽约州民主党)于6月提出的《增加投资者机会法案》包括两项措施,可能会使对冲基金更难向封闭式基金施压并赢得代理权之争。一项拟议的改变将取消目前对风险投资和私募股权基金等非流动性私募基金的封闭式基金所有权15%的限制。第二项措施将阻止激进对冲基金收购封闭式基金 10% 以上的股份。</blockquote></p><p> A spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>冈萨雷斯的发言人拒绝置评。米克斯没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Proponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.</p><p><blockquote>这些变化的支持者表示,他们将扩大散户投资者进入私人市场的机会。他们还表示,对冲基金正在利用证券法的漏洞,以牺牲长期股东的利益为代价,让他们背负纳税义务、更高的费用和强制基金清算。投资公司协会(ICI)在最近的一份声明中说,该法案将消除 “激进投资者以散户投资者为代价获取短期利润的漏洞”。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.</p><p><blockquote>投资于封闭式基金的对冲基金和投资组合经理表示,共同基金公司只是试图保护资产池和费用免受股东干预。大多数散户投资者不会在代理权竞争中投票。这可能会让基金董事会在很大程度上自由地追求自己的议程。</blockquote></p><p> “Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.</p><p><blockquote>“激进主义发挥着重要作用,如果这项法案获得通过,激进分子将更难威胁或创造变革,”激进主义对冲基金德莱顿资本(Dryden Capital)的投资组合经理马特-巴芬顿(Matt Buffington)说。</blockquote></p><p> Gregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的咨询公司 Relative Value Partners 的投资组合经理 Gregory Neer 对此表示同意。“他说:”投资者向资金施压的能力对所有股东都有好处。</blockquote></p><p> Closed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.</p><p><blockquote>封闭式基金因其收益率高、分布稳定等特点,长期以来备受投资者欢迎。许多人使用杠杆,以市场利率借钱来增加支出。他们还通过期权策略以及对股票和债券市场高收益领域的投资产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> But the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.</p><p><blockquote>但这些基金存在结构性缺陷。根据晨星直接的数据,费用率很高,平均为 2.1%。由于这些基金拥有固定数量的流通股,价格反映了市场对基金及其标的资产的需求。基金的交易价格通常低于资产净值。虽然从理论上讲,为一美元的资产支付90美分是有吸引力的,但投资者可能永远不会看到额外的一毛钱。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金旨在利用这种低效率,以低于市场价值的价格购买封闭式基金。然后,他们向基金董事会施压,要求其采取措施提高基金价格。策略很简单:积累股份,赢得董事会席位,然后迫使基金公司提出要约收购,同意以接近全价回购股票。</blockquote></p><p> If that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.</p><p><blockquote>如果失败,对冲基金可能会尝试更换基金经理、安排基金清算,或者将其转换为开放式基金--这些举措也可能在股价上涨至与资产净值持平的情况下获得回报。像Saba这样的公司也完全接管了基金。</blockquote></p><p> Giving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tells<i>Barron’s</i>.</p><p><blockquote>给予封闭式基金持有更多私人证券的自由可能会给该战略带来麻烦。只有当基金能够以市场价格清算其大部分持有的股份时,要约收购才有效。由于风险投资和私募股权通常不公开交易,因此它们的定价并不透明。“一位激进主义经理说:”当封闭式基金投资于非流动性资产时,就能保护它们免受激进主义的影响。<i>巴伦</i>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Removing the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.</p><p><blockquote>共同基金行业律师托马斯-德卡波(Thomas DeCapo)说,取消私募基金所有权上限 “符合让散户投资者有更多机会获得私人投资的立法议程”。</blockquote></p><p> And capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”</p><p><blockquote>将激进分子的份额限制在基金的 10% 并不能阻止他们发起代理人运动。“他说:”这一切都不反民主。“这并不能阻止大多数不满意或希望改变的投资者。它阻止了一个投资者利用自己的经济权力,用别人的钱,基本上迫使其他人做出改变”。</blockquote></p><p> Investor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.</p><p><blockquote>然而,投资者倡导者有不同的看法,他们表示,基金投资者最终可能会为持有更不透明投资的基金支付更高的费用。“投资者保护组织 Healthy Markets 的负责人泰勒-格拉施(Tyler Gellasch)说:”这只是另一个基金中的基金结构,而且这些基金的费用是出了名的高。</blockquote></p><p> Individual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.</p><p><blockquote>根据 1940 年《投资公司法》(Investment Company Act)的所有权限制,从技术上讲,单个对冲基金持有的封闭式基金不得超过 3%。但他们通过附属实体建立股份来规避规则,创造足够的临界质量,通过代理投票迫使基金发生变化。</blockquote></p><p> The ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.</p><p><blockquote>ICI--共同基金行业的游说团体--试图说服监管机构打击对冲基金。在去年提交给美国证券交易委员会的一份文件中,ICI 认为对冲基金活动往往会消耗基金的资源,引发长期投资者的纳税义务,并导致被迫出售证券以满足对冲基金的要约收购要求。如果基金被迫回购股票,而其资产基础缩水,那么基金的费用率可能会上升。</blockquote></p><p> The activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.</p><p><blockquote>ICI 表示,激进社区对行业的 “攻击 ”对产品发布产生了寒蝉效应,导致目前市场上的封闭式基金数量少于 2007 年。</blockquote></p><p> But hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”</p><p><blockquote>但对冲基金认为,修改 1940 年法案将相当于共同基金的权力攫取。“斗牛犬投资者公司(Bulldog Investors)的联合创始人菲尔-戈尔茨坦(Phil Goldstein)说:”这一切都来自共同基金行业,这保护了他们绝非巧合。“有些基金业绩糟糕,折扣幅度很大。ICI 从未说过我们需要一种机制,让股东追究这些经理的责任。”</blockquote></p><p> Imposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”</p><p><blockquote>施加所有权上限也会降低代理人竞选活动的经济性。如果被限制在 10%,对冲基金就不会拥有足够的股份,也不会有足够的经济利益来证明代理权争夺的费用是合理的,而代理权争夺可能会花费数百万美元。“戈尔茨坦说:”如果你被限制在 10%,却不得不将 2.5% 的资产用于代理竞选活动,你会说这太冒险了。“与此同时,管理层什么都不花--只是股东的钱。他们想让代理权竞争在经济上变得没有吸引力”。</blockquote></p><p> Regulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>监管机构和法院对封闭式基金为防止股东挑战而采取的一些辩护措施表示怀疑。而且,美国证券交易委员会可能不会站在基金业一边。自2010年以来,美国证券交易委员会一直警告基金公司不要利用州证券法阻挠对冲基金收购。去年,在共和党主席杰伊-克莱顿(Jay Clayton)的领导下,美国证券交易委员会放弃了对这些州 “控制份额 ”法律的反对。但民主党新任主席加里-根斯勒(Gary Gensler)可能会恢复美国证券交易委员会的反对意见--这也是该行业争取国会修改法律的理由。美国证券交易委员会没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Institutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”</p><p><blockquote>机构股东服务公司(Institutional Shareholder Services)是一家就代理投票提出建议的公司,该公司表示,投资者应拒绝基金公司利用限制股东投票权的州控股法。ISS 表示,由于美国证券交易委员会(SEC)置身事外,“CEF 股东被剥夺了重要的投票权,并受到管理层的巩固”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70323ed9daef142f19afd48be72b6299\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68beb47d59eb02e90b04eb7093f9f17b\" tg-width=\"759\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Hedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金并不总是能赢,但投资者可能希望在激进分子入股时顺风顺水。“南卡罗来纳大学金融学副教授马特-索瑟(Matt Souther)说:”当激进分子进来时,你通常会看到股价上涨,折扣减少。</blockquote></p><p> Templeton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>如果 Saba 收购更多股份或试图接管该基金 7.43 亿美元的资产,邓普顿全球收入公司(股票代码:GIM)对资产净值的折扣可能会进一步缩小。Saba 最近接管了另一只基金 Voya Prime Rate Trust 的管理权,并将其更名为 Saba Capital Income & Opportunities (BRW)。富兰克林邓普顿和 Saba 拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.</p><p><blockquote>Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE)也是 Saba 的目标。该基金是一个 “定期信托”,规定清算日期为 2024 年。其交易价格较资产净值折扣 5.9%。“拥有 HIE 的封闭式基金 FriverNorth Opportunities(RIV)的联席经理帕特里克-加利(Patrick Galley)说:”在最坏的情况下,你会以折扣价买入,从现在到 2024 年,你将获得超额回报,因为折扣价会缩小。</blockquote></p><p> Other closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).</p><p><blockquote>Saba 持有股份的其他封闭式基金包括 Source Capital (SOR) 和 Vesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities (VTA)。Bulldog 已经在 inTortoise Energy Independence (NDP) 建立了自己的地位。</blockquote></p><p> Some closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.</p><p><blockquote>一些封闭式基金的基本面看起来很有吸引力。 Adams Diversified Equity (ADX) 提供大型科技股的投资,交易价格较资产净值折扣 14%,并承诺年化分配至少为 6%。“旧金山封闭式投资者、泰珀资本管理公司(Tepper Capital Management)负责人大卫-泰珀(David Tepper)说:”对于期望科技股表现良好的投资者来说,ADX 是一个不错的持股选择。</blockquote></p><p> Sprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.</p><p><blockquote>Sprott Focus Trust(基金)是他喜欢的另一只基金。资深小盘股经理惠特尼·乔治 (Whitney George) 经营该公司,他的家族拥有 45% 的股份。它的交易折扣为 10%,收益率为 5.7%。泰珀还青睐罗伊斯全球价值信托 (RGT),其交易折扣为 9%,收益率为 7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> None of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.</p><p><blockquote>根据证券文件,这些基金都没有吸引太多活动人士的参与。但是,如果激进分子看到了机会,他们可能会蜂拥而至,向基金管理部门施压--前提是国会不改写交战规则。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金活动家的开放季节。基金持有人如何赢得和失败</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金活动家的开放季节。基金持有人如何赢得和失败</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barron's</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 07:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>邓普顿全球收益基金多年来一直让投资者感到沮丧。尽管明星经理迈克尔·哈森斯塔布 (Michael Hasenstab) 掌舵,但该封闭式基金在过去十年中的平均年回报率为 0.3%,而全球同行的平均年回报率为 7%。同样令人沮丧的是,该基金的股票交易很少接近基金的标的资产净值(NAV)。过去三年平均折扣为11%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.</p><p><blockquote>然而,多亏了激进投资者博阿兹·韦恩斯坦 (Boaz Weinstein) 经营的对冲基金公司 Saba Capital Management,投资者才得以突破。萨巴持有邓普顿基金 20% 的股份,最近赢得了四个有争议的董事会席位。它一直在向董事会施压,要求其采取行动提高股价。其举措取得了成效:随着股价上涨,该基金今年的总回报率为 4.5%,资产净值折扣已缩小至 4%。</blockquote></p><p> Tactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.</p><p><blockquote>像萨巴这样的策略长期以来一直激怒着共同基金公司;没有人希望对冲基金发动政变。现在,由于众议院最近提出的一项法案,在国会的帮助下,竞争环境可能会向封闭式基金及其公司赞助商倾斜。这可能会损害基金投资者的利益。</blockquote></p><p> The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.</p><p><blockquote>众议员安东尼·冈萨雷斯(俄亥俄州共和党)和众议员格雷戈里·米克斯(纽约州民主党)于6月提出的《增加投资者机会法案》包括两项措施,可能会使对冲基金更难向封闭式基金施压并赢得代理权之争。一项拟议的改变将取消目前对风险投资和私募股权基金等非流动性私募基金的封闭式基金所有权15%的限制。第二项措施将阻止激进对冲基金收购封闭式基金 10% 以上的股份。</blockquote></p><p> A spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>冈萨雷斯的发言人拒绝置评。米克斯没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Proponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.</p><p><blockquote>这些变化的支持者表示,他们将扩大散户投资者进入私人市场的机会。他们还表示,对冲基金正在利用证券法的漏洞,以牺牲长期股东的利益为代价,让他们背负纳税义务、更高的费用和强制基金清算。投资公司协会(ICI)在最近的一份声明中说,该法案将消除 “激进投资者以散户投资者为代价获取短期利润的漏洞”。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.</p><p><blockquote>投资于封闭式基金的对冲基金和投资组合经理表示,共同基金公司只是试图保护资产池和费用免受股东干预。大多数散户投资者不会在代理权竞争中投票。这可能会让基金董事会在很大程度上自由地追求自己的议程。</blockquote></p><p> “Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.</p><p><blockquote>“激进主义发挥着重要作用,如果这项法案获得通过,激进分子将更难威胁或创造变革,”激进主义对冲基金德莱顿资本(Dryden Capital)的投资组合经理马特-巴芬顿(Matt Buffington)说。</blockquote></p><p> Gregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的咨询公司 Relative Value Partners 的投资组合经理 Gregory Neer 对此表示同意。“他说:”投资者向资金施压的能力对所有股东都有好处。</blockquote></p><p> Closed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.</p><p><blockquote>封闭式基金因其收益率高、分布稳定等特点,长期以来备受投资者欢迎。许多人使用杠杆,以市场利率借钱来增加支出。他们还通过期权策略以及对股票和债券市场高收益领域的投资产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> But the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.</p><p><blockquote>但这些基金存在结构性缺陷。根据晨星直接的数据,费用率很高,平均为 2.1%。由于这些基金拥有固定数量的流通股,价格反映了市场对基金及其标的资产的需求。基金的交易价格通常低于资产净值。虽然从理论上讲,为一美元的资产支付90美分是有吸引力的,但投资者可能永远不会看到额外的一毛钱。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金旨在利用这种低效率,以低于市场价值的价格购买封闭式基金。然后,他们向基金董事会施压,要求其采取措施提高基金价格。策略很简单:积累股份,赢得董事会席位,然后迫使基金公司提出要约收购,同意以接近全价回购股票。</blockquote></p><p> If that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.</p><p><blockquote>如果失败,对冲基金可能会尝试更换基金经理、安排基金清算,或者将其转换为开放式基金--这些举措也可能在股价上涨至与资产净值持平的情况下获得回报。像Saba这样的公司也完全接管了基金。</blockquote></p><p> Giving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tells<i>Barron’s</i>.</p><p><blockquote>给予封闭式基金持有更多私人证券的自由可能会给该战略带来麻烦。只有当基金能够以市场价格清算其大部分持有的股份时,要约收购才有效。由于风险投资和私募股权通常不公开交易,因此它们的定价并不透明。“一位激进主义经理说:”当封闭式基金投资于非流动性资产时,就能保护它们免受激进主义的影响。<i>巴伦</i>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Removing the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.</p><p><blockquote>共同基金行业律师托马斯-德卡波(Thomas DeCapo)说,取消私募基金所有权上限 “符合让散户投资者有更多机会获得私人投资的立法议程”。</blockquote></p><p> And capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”</p><p><blockquote>将激进分子的份额限制在基金的 10% 并不能阻止他们发起代理人运动。“他说:”这一切都不反民主。“这并不能阻止大多数不满意或希望改变的投资者。它阻止了一个投资者利用自己的经济权力,用别人的钱,基本上迫使其他人做出改变”。</blockquote></p><p> Investor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.</p><p><blockquote>然而,投资者倡导者有不同的看法,他们表示,基金投资者最终可能会为持有更不透明投资的基金支付更高的费用。“投资者保护组织 Healthy Markets 的负责人泰勒-格拉施(Tyler Gellasch)说:”这只是另一个基金中的基金结构,而且这些基金的费用是出了名的高。</blockquote></p><p> Individual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.</p><p><blockquote>根据 1940 年《投资公司法》(Investment Company Act)的所有权限制,从技术上讲,单个对冲基金持有的封闭式基金不得超过 3%。但他们通过附属实体建立股份来规避规则,创造足够的临界质量,通过代理投票迫使基金发生变化。</blockquote></p><p> The ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.</p><p><blockquote>ICI--共同基金行业的游说团体--试图说服监管机构打击对冲基金。在去年提交给美国证券交易委员会的一份文件中,ICI 认为对冲基金活动往往会消耗基金的资源,引发长期投资者的纳税义务,并导致被迫出售证券以满足对冲基金的要约收购要求。如果基金被迫回购股票,而其资产基础缩水,那么基金的费用率可能会上升。</blockquote></p><p> The activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.</p><p><blockquote>ICI 表示,激进社区对行业的 “攻击 ”对产品发布产生了寒蝉效应,导致目前市场上的封闭式基金数量少于 2007 年。</blockquote></p><p> But hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”</p><p><blockquote>但对冲基金认为,修改 1940 年法案将相当于共同基金的权力攫取。“斗牛犬投资者公司(Bulldog Investors)的联合创始人菲尔-戈尔茨坦(Phil Goldstein)说:”这一切都来自共同基金行业,这保护了他们绝非巧合。“有些基金业绩糟糕,折扣幅度很大。ICI 从未说过我们需要一种机制,让股东追究这些经理的责任。”</blockquote></p><p> Imposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”</p><p><blockquote>施加所有权上限也会降低代理人竞选活动的经济性。如果被限制在 10%,对冲基金就不会拥有足够的股份,也不会有足够的经济利益来证明代理权争夺的费用是合理的,而代理权争夺可能会花费数百万美元。“戈尔茨坦说:”如果你被限制在 10%,却不得不将 2.5% 的资产用于代理竞选活动,你会说这太冒险了。“与此同时,管理层什么都不花--只是股东的钱。他们想让代理权竞争在经济上变得没有吸引力”。</blockquote></p><p> Regulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>监管机构和法院对封闭式基金为防止股东挑战而采取的一些辩护措施表示怀疑。而且,美国证券交易委员会可能不会站在基金业一边。自2010年以来,美国证券交易委员会一直警告基金公司不要利用州证券法阻挠对冲基金收购。去年,在共和党主席杰伊-克莱顿(Jay Clayton)的领导下,美国证券交易委员会放弃了对这些州 “控制份额 ”法律的反对。但民主党新任主席加里-根斯勒(Gary Gensler)可能会恢复美国证券交易委员会的反对意见--这也是该行业争取国会修改法律的理由。美国证券交易委员会没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Institutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”</p><p><blockquote>机构股东服务公司(Institutional Shareholder Services)是一家就代理投票提出建议的公司,该公司表示,投资者应拒绝基金公司利用限制股东投票权的州控股法。ISS 表示,由于美国证券交易委员会(SEC)置身事外,“CEF 股东被剥夺了重要的投票权,并受到管理层的巩固”。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70323ed9daef142f19afd48be72b6299\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68beb47d59eb02e90b04eb7093f9f17b\" tg-width=\"759\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Hedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金并不总是能赢,但投资者可能希望在激进分子入股时顺风顺水。“南卡罗来纳大学金融学副教授马特-索瑟(Matt Souther)说:”当激进分子进来时,你通常会看到股价上涨,折扣减少。</blockquote></p><p> Templeton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>如果 Saba 收购更多股份或试图接管该基金 7.43 亿美元的资产,邓普顿全球收入公司(股票代码:GIM)对资产净值的折扣可能会进一步缩小。Saba 最近接管了另一只基金 Voya Prime Rate Trust 的管理权,并将其更名为 Saba Capital Income & Opportunities (BRW)。富兰克林邓普顿和 Saba 拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.</p><p><blockquote>Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE)也是 Saba 的目标。该基金是一个 “定期信托”,规定清算日期为 2024 年。其交易价格较资产净值折扣 5.9%。“拥有 HIE 的封闭式基金 FriverNorth Opportunities(RIV)的联席经理帕特里克-加利(Patrick Galley)说:”在最坏的情况下,你会以折扣价买入,从现在到 2024 年,你将获得超额回报,因为折扣价会缩小。</blockquote></p><p> Other closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).</p><p><blockquote>Saba 持有股份的其他封闭式基金包括 Source Capital (SOR) 和 Vesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities (VTA)。Bulldog 已经在 inTortoise Energy Independence (NDP) 建立了自己的地位。</blockquote></p><p> Some closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.</p><p><blockquote>一些封闭式基金的基本面看起来很有吸引力。 Adams Diversified Equity (ADX) 提供大型科技股的投资,交易价格较资产净值折扣 14%,并承诺年化分配至少为 6%。“旧金山封闭式投资者、泰珀资本管理公司(Tepper Capital Management)负责人大卫-泰珀(David Tepper)说:”对于期望科技股表现良好的投资者来说,ADX 是一个不错的持股选择。</blockquote></p><p> Sprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.</p><p><blockquote>Sprott Focus Trust(基金)是他喜欢的另一只基金。资深小盘股经理惠特尼·乔治 (Whitney George) 经营该公司,他的家族拥有 45% 的股份。它的交易折扣为 10%,收益率为 5.7%。泰珀还青睐罗伊斯全球价值信托 (RGT),其交易折扣为 9%,收益率为 7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> None of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.</p><p><blockquote>根据证券文件,这些基金都没有吸引太多活动人士的参与。但是,如果激进分子看到了机会,他们可能会蜂拥而至,向基金管理部门施压--前提是国会不改写交战规则。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click\">Barron's</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138566016","content_text":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.\nInvestors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.\nTactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.\nThe Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.\nA spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nProponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.\nHedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.\n“Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.\nGregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.\nClosed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.\nBut the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.\nHedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.\nIf that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.\nGiving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tellsBarron’s.\nRemoving the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.\nAnd capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”\nInvestor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.\nIndividual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.\nThe ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.\nThe activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.\nBut hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”\nImposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”\nRegulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nInstitutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”\nHedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.\nTempleton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.\nMiller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.\nOther closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).\nSome closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.\nSprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.\nNone of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4160,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897061926,"gmtCreate":1628863449965,"gmtModify":1633688907468,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Late st","listText":"Late st","text":"Late st","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897061926","repostId":"2159647290","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2358,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807288039,"gmtCreate":1628038999121,"gmtModify":1633754175790,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tesla","listText":"Tesla","text":"Tesla","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807288039","repostId":"1141615218","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3969,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807939900,"gmtCreate":1627994898200,"gmtModify":1633754570550,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807939900","repostId":"2156147918","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802765625,"gmtCreate":1627809952367,"gmtModify":1633756191989,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Interesting.","listText":"Interesting.","text":"Interesting.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802765625","repostId":"1136794908","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2312,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806795306,"gmtCreate":1627692832505,"gmtModify":1633757113173,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806795306","repostId":"2155001152","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3841,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897066443,"gmtCreate":1628863559582,"gmtModify":1633688905745,"author":{"id":"3585041206091097","authorId":"3585041206091097","name":"jummpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aa835bddf874aa4d6dc48c02fba9d592","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585041206091097","idStr":"3585041206091097"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Omg","listText":"Omg","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/897066443","repostId":"2159903472","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159903472","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628863309,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2159903472?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-13 22:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159903472","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE: XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:XL)周五股价走低,此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分,低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元,低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信,市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚,然而,供应链问题和关键材料(尤其是微芯片)的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业,严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为:</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元,最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时,该股下跌 6.90%,至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy XL Fleet Shares Are Trading Lower Today<blockquote>为什么 XL Fleet 股价今天走低</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-13 22:01</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL Fleet Corp</a></b> (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XL\">XL舰队公司</a></b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:XL)周五股价走低,此前该公司宣布第二季度财务业绩逊于预期。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet 公布季度每股收益亏损 8 美分,低于每股亏损 5 美分的预期。该公司公布季度收入为 369 万美元,低于 440 万美元的预期。</blockquote></p><p> We believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said <b>Dimitri Kazarinoff</b>, CEO of XL Fleet.</p><p><blockquote>我们相信,市场对商用车队电气化解决方案的兴趣依然浓厚,然而,供应链问题和关键材料(尤其是微芯片)的大规模短缺继续影响着全球汽车行业,严重影响了车队客户获得安装了我们电气化驱动系统的新车的能力。”<b>迪米特里·卡扎里诺夫</b>XL Fleet 首席执行官。</blockquote></p><p> XL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.</p><p><blockquote>XL Fleet是北美商用车车队电气化解决方案提供商。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格行为:</b>XL Fleet 在 52 周内的交易价格最高可达 35 美元,最低可达 5.41 美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.</p><p><blockquote>周五最后一次检查时,该股下跌 6.90%,至 6.61 美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159903472","content_text":"XL Fleet Corp (NYSE:XL) is trading lower Friday after the company announced worse-than-expected second-quarter financial results.\nXL Fleet reported a quarterly earnings loss of 8 cents per share, which came in below the estimate for a loss of 5 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.69 million, which came in below the estimate of $4.4 million.\nWe believe market interest in commercial fleet electrification solutions remains strong, however, supply chain issues and wide scale shortages of key materials, especially microchips, continue to impact the global automotive industry, significantly interrupting the ability of fleet customers to secure new vehicles on which our electrified drive systems are installed,” said Dimitri Kazarinoff, CEO of XL Fleet.\nXL Fleet is a provider of fleet electrification solutions for commercial vehicles in North America.\nPrice Action: XL Fleet has traded as high as $35 and as low as $5.41 over a 52-week period.\nAt last check Friday, the stock was down 6.90% at $6.61.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3643,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}