+关注
Zin222
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:未知
19
关注
2
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
Zin222
2021-11-10
$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$
Share
Zin222
2021-11-06
Share
Zin222
2021-11-04
Share
Zin222
2021-11-04
$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-31
$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-23
$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-20
$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-19
$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-19
Share
Zin222
2021-10-19
Share
Zin222
2021-10-17
$Transocean(RIG)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-17
Share
Zin222
2021-10-17
Share
Zin222
2021-10-16
Share
Zin222
2021-10-16
$Transocean(RIG)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-14
Share
Zin222
2021-10-14
$Transocean(RIG)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-12
Share
Zin222
2021-10-12
$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$
Share
Zin222
2021-10-11
$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$
Share
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4088044554432220","uuid":"4088044554432220","gmtCreate":1624942682512,"gmtModify":1624942682512,"name":"Zin222","pinyin":"zin222","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":19,"tweetSize":91,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":847475315,"gmtCreate":1636551262360,"gmtModify":1636551292957,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","text":"$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/140d7e9c0c932164c00a5919a49f09f5","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/847475315","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2717,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":842544773,"gmtCreate":1636208507754,"gmtModify":1636208507863,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/986c34f5c73cfbd1f5d4153b2c4a6b2b","width":"1125","height":"3463"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842544773","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":846088189,"gmtCreate":1636035220717,"gmtModify":1636035220872,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d185da92af27fbadfa8f16255ad9f9bb","width":"1125","height":"3450"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/846088189","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4628,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":846083246,"gmtCreate":1636035147956,"gmtModify":1636035193345,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","text":"$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a270a014607b77c02f686f947ae17c27","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/846083246","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3427,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":840144086,"gmtCreate":1635610889007,"gmtModify":1635610889087,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","text":"$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41485a14e268d71e07033e534cf724d8","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/840144086","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3524,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":858181419,"gmtCreate":1635004124520,"gmtModify":1635004124648,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FTEK\">$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FTEK\">$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$</a>Share","text":"$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28e80948e1b743a4e8d55d3f52d025d2","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858181419","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2586,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859244407,"gmtCreate":1634704776272,"gmtModify":1634704776434,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FTEK\">$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FTEK\">$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$</a>Share","text":"$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57a2838eb308c9e57afd5031b5d96abf","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859244407","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2669,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859947402,"gmtCreate":1634652789756,"gmtModify":1634653102369,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FTEK\">$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FTEK\">$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$</a>Share","text":"$Fuel Tech(FTEK)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/611d21eec72ef75bc277ff9936712035","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859947402","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3231,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859942526,"gmtCreate":1634652674300,"gmtModify":1634652982986,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4183e29964f21b7262fc57abe3efd026","width":"1125","height":"3292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859942526","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3653,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859942066,"gmtCreate":1634652637162,"gmtModify":1634652981825,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31088db079718460b5cd4fcf020b8c2e","width":"1125","height":"3371"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859942066","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3849,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":827213626,"gmtCreate":1634476790067,"gmtModify":1634476790211,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIG\">$Transocean(RIG)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIG\">$Transocean(RIG)$</a>Share","text":"$Transocean(RIG)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9efca1bcab1450715cb625ac738c95a","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/827213626","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":975,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":827853330,"gmtCreate":1634446699156,"gmtModify":1634446699265,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/74693f961e6d2ee94dd1a9168820d516","width":"1125","height":"3700"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/827853330","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":605,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":827853047,"gmtCreate":1634446676429,"gmtModify":1634446676576,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d8eeba938cbab4196a817f1a933aa7c","width":"1125","height":"3621"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/827853047","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":841,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":827964379,"gmtCreate":1634392571341,"gmtModify":1634392571446,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e24b4d44c3bb3f5e56a400ef1b032610","width":"1125","height":"3463"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/827964379","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":636,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":827965232,"gmtCreate":1634392464275,"gmtModify":1634392464423,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIG\">$Transocean(RIG)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIG\">$Transocean(RIG)$</a>Share","text":"$Transocean(RIG)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9efca1bcab1450715cb625ac738c95a","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/827965232","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1045,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":825938895,"gmtCreate":1634187366728,"gmtModify":1634187366728,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98de1ac6d959546b6c4dfea1bfe64e81","width":"1125","height":"3463"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/825938895","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1003,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":825931462,"gmtCreate":1634187344181,"gmtModify":1634187344304,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIG\">$Transocean(RIG)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIG\">$Transocean(RIG)$</a>Share","text":"$Transocean(RIG)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb56f87e0a37271540492598d749b091","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/825931462","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":826702259,"gmtCreate":1634050863237,"gmtModify":1634050863344,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share","listText":"Share","text":"Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a2e404626bc23b87525603c6ef085d5","width":"1125","height":"3450"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/826702259","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":690,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":826702947,"gmtCreate":1634050833624,"gmtModify":1634050833761,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","text":"$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6c3ca4e583af8bf57919ffb3ce8a92","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/826702947","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":624,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":828649026,"gmtCreate":1633912519919,"gmtModify":1633912519919,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNGO\">$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$</a>Share","text":"$Bionano Genomics(BNGO)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74b87a75a7255a8e191d97f89fcdc96","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828649026","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1034,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":894050227,"gmtCreate":1628778890069,"gmtModify":1633689552431,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894050227","repostId":"2158250170","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158250170","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628777697,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2158250170?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-12 22:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"A Three-Prong Crucible? Markets Eye Record Highs Amid Inflation, Fiscal, And Delta Uncertainty<blockquote>三叉坩埚?由于通胀、财政和三角洲的不确定性,市场关注历史新高</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158250170","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"Yesterday the market got behind the Fed’s idea that inflation is transitory after a calm consumer price index (CPI) reading. ","content":"<p>Yesterday the market got behind the Fed’s idea that inflation is transitory after a calm consumer price index (CPI) reading.</p><p><blockquote>昨天,在消费者价格指数(CPI)数据平静之后,市场支持美联储的观点,即通胀是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> Will that change today after a sizzling producer price index (PPI) reading? Remember that any gains in PPI can often get reflected in CPI down the road as companies react to higher wholesale prices by passing them along to the consumer. And then there’s the other side of the coin—where companies absorb these prices, which can impact margins. Either way, inflation tends to pack a wallop.</p><p><blockquote>在火热的生产者价格指数(PPI)读数之后,今天这种情况会改变吗?请记住,PPI 的任何上涨通常都会反映在未来的 CPI 中,因为公司会通过将批发价格转嫁给消费者来应对更高的批发价格。还有硬币的另一面--公司吸收这些价格,这可能会影响利润率。不管怎样,通货膨胀往往会造成沉重打击。</blockquote></p><p> Major indices didn’t immediately react much to a July PPI reading of 1%, which was way above the Wall Street analyst consensus of 0.5%. That followed yesterday’s CPI coming in about as expected and well below the June level. The July PPI was equal to June’s, so that kind of takes a bit of the transitory argument away. Also, core PPI, which strips out volatile energy and food prices, was the same as the headline figure, so there’s no hiding behind that.</p><p><blockquote>主要股指对 7 月份 PPI 读数为 1%(远高于华尔街分析师一致认为的 0.5%)没有立即做出太大反应。在此之前,昨天的 CPI 基本符合预期,远低于 6 月份的水平。7 月份的 PPI 与 6 月份持平,因此这在一定程度上消除了暂时性的论点。此外,剔除波动较大的能源和食品价格的核心 PPI 与总体数字相同,因此这背后没有任何隐瞒。</blockquote></p><p> The PPI report is just the start of today’s action. Later on, <b>Disney </b>(NYSE:DIS) steps onto center stage with its earnings report. Focus is likely to be on streaming and whether the Delta variant might slow attendance gains at theme parks and movie theaters. It’s likely DIS executives will be asked how the big jump in Florida cases is affecting the Magic Kingdom in Orlando.</p><p><blockquote>PPI 报告只是今天行动的开始。后来,<b>迪士尼</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:DIS)凭借其收益报告登上中心舞台。焦点可能是流媒体以及德尔塔变异毒株是否会减缓主题公园和电影院的上座率增长。DIS 的高管们很可能会被问到佛罗里达州案件的大幅增加对奥兰多的魔法王国有何影响。</blockquote></p><p> Weekly jobless claims of 375,000 were more in line with estimates and pretty much down the middle compared with recent numbers. There doesn’t seem to be much improvement going on here, but it’s not getting worse, either. The number probably won’t have much influence today.</p><p><blockquote>每周申请失业救济人数为 375,000 人,更符合预期,与最近的数字相比,几乎处于中间位置。这里的情况似乎没有太大改善,但也没有变得更糟。这个数字在今天可能不会有太大影响。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, investors are likely to spend their time trying to make sense of these contrasting inflation indicators, which might explain why major indices initially went nowhere in pre-market trading on the PPI reading. Does this strong PPI give the Fed more reason to begin its tapering earlier than expected, or will the Fed wait for another month of data to try and get more clarity? If history means anything, we can probably bet on option two.</p><p><blockquote>相反,投资者可能会花时间试图理解这些对比鲜明的通胀指标,这可能解释了为什么主要指数最初在PPI读数的盘前交易中一事无成。这种强劲的PPI是否给了美联储更多比预期更早开始缩减规模的理由,还是美联储会再等待一个月的数据来试图获得更多的清晰度?如果历史意味着什么,我们或许可以押注选项二。</blockquote></p><p> <h2>Inflationary Showdown Shows Slight Slowdown</h2> Wednesday’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) report told investors mostly what they already knew: overall inflation is running hot. But that’s not what the market was keen to focus on. Instead, investors appeared to be looking at the core CPI, which jumped 4.3% year over year as expected but only 0.3% on a monthly basis—a tad less than the 0.4% analysts estimated.</p><p><blockquote><h2>通胀摊牌显示略有放缓</h2>周三的消费者价格指数(CPI)报告告诉了投资者他们已经知道的大部分信息: 整体通胀正在升温。但这并不是市场热衷于关注的问题。相反,投资者似乎正在关注核心 CPI,该指数如预期同比上涨 4.3%,但环比仅上涨 0.3%,略低于分析师预期的 0.4%。</blockquote></p><p> On top of this, the Fed’s “transitory” narrative suddenly seemed a bit more believable as a slowdown in used car prices likely allayed fears of a monetary sudden-brake shock. Used car prices rose only 0.2% in July, a small bump compared to the prior month’s steep 10% surge.</p><p><blockquote>除此之外,美联储的 “过渡性 ”说法突然显得更可信了,因为二手车价格放缓可能会减轻人们对货币急刹车冲击的担忧。7 月份二手车价格仅上涨 0.2%,与上月 10% 的大幅飙升相比,涨幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> But again, this morning’s PPI seems to be at least a partial counterargument to the transitory view. A single month’s data isn’t a trend, but this is certainly <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to keep an eye on.</p><p><blockquote>不过,今天上午的 PPI 似乎至少是对短暂观点的部分反驳。单月数据不是趋势,但这肯定是趋势<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>留意。</blockquote></p><p> Following the CPI report, the <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average </b>($DJI) jumped as much as 200 points, with <b>Caterpillar </b>(NYSE:CAT) and <b>Home Depot</b> (NYSE:HD) leading the index, while 10-year Treasury yields stood mostly flat, and “FAANG” stocks slid into negative territory, with the exception of <b>Apple </b>(NASDAQ:AAPL). Could it be that fears of a “too-laid-back” Fed policy are starting to morph into a “just right” Goldilocks scenario?</p><p><blockquote>继CPI报告之后,<b>道琼斯工业指数</b>($DJI) 上涨多达 200 点,<b>卡特彼勒</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:CAT)和<b>家得宝</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:HD)领涨该指数,而 10 年期国债收益率基本持平,“FAANG”股票滑入负值区域,但 10 年期国债收益率除外。<b>苹果</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:AAPL)会不会是对美联储 “过于宽松 ”政策的担忧开始演变成 “恰到好处 ”的金发姑娘情景?</blockquote></p><p> Big cyclical sectors like Energy and Financials were already on the upswing this week even before yesterday’s bullish CPI data. Strength in these sectors helped give the blue-chip <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b> ($DJI) a lift so far over the other major indices.</p><p><blockquote>甚至在昨天看涨的 CPI 数据公布之前,能源和金融等大型周期性行业本周就已经开始上涨。这些板块的强势帮助蓝筹股<b>道琼斯工业指数</b>($DJI) 迄今为止,涨幅高于其他主要指数。</blockquote></p><p> <h2>Small-Caps Still Scuffling</h2> So where does that leave small-caps, which are often known for their solid performance during economic recoveries? The small-cap <b>Russell 2000 Index</b> (RUT) is still scuffling a bit, pretty much flat so far this month and well below its 2021 highs. It did rise a bit on Wednesday, but again got outpaced by the $DJI. It’s basically still stuck in a volatile 5-month “rut” despite the strong and steady doses of easy-money policy.</p><p><blockquote><h2>小盘股仍在混战</h2>那么,小盘股在经济复苏期间通常以稳健的表现而闻名,这将给小盘股带来什么影响呢?小盘股<b>罗素2000指数</b>(RUT)仍然有点混战,本月到目前为止基本持平,远低于 2021 年的高点。周三确实有所上涨,但再次被 DJI 美元超越。尽管实行了强有力且稳定的宽松货币政策,但它基本上仍停留在 5 个月的不稳定 “常态”中。</blockquote></p><p> It might be worth watching to see if RUT can break out of the slow pattern it entered after emerging from its early summer selloff. Which way RUT goes from here might help provide clues about the market as a whole, because RUT can be an early leader up or down.</p><p><blockquote>RUT 能否摆脱初夏抛售后进入的缓慢模式可能值得关注。RUT 今后的走向可能有助于提供有关整个市场的线索,因为 RUT 可能是上涨或下跌的早期领导者。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Another consideration is where the FAANG stocks go if Treasury yields resume their climb. Remember that earlier this year, rising yields appeared to take a big bite out of the “mega-cap” Tech stocks, with AAPL and<b> Tesla</b> (NASDAQ:TSLA) among that hit hardest. It’s fine to say that Financials and Energy can pick up the slack, but that ignores the fact that the FAANGs—like it or not—comprise about 20% of the value of the SPX. That means any significant setbacks for these huge companies could drag the overall index.</p><p><blockquote>另一个考虑因素是,如果美国国债收益率恢复攀升,FAANG 股票将走向何方。请记住,今年早些时候,收益率上升似乎对 “巨型 ”科技股造成了沉重打击,苹果公司和<b>特斯拉</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:TSLA)是受影响最严重的公司之一。可以说金融和能源可以弥补这一不足,但这忽略了一个事实,即 FAANG--不管你喜不喜欢--约占 SPX 价值的 20%。这意味着这些大公司的任何重大挫折都可能拖累整体指数。</blockquote></p><p> Since May, mega-cap Techs have been helping pull up the SPX while some of the other sectors struggle. Analysts are talking about how the rally has less “depth,” meaning it’s more dependent on a few big gorillas to keep it going. While yields aren’t in the kind of territory we saw last spring, it’s worth watching that relationship between yields and FAANGs for clues about where the market goes next.</p><p><blockquote>自 5 月份以来,大型科技股一直在帮助拉高 SPX,而其他一些行业则陷入困境。分析师们正在谈论这次反弹的 “深度”越来越小,这意味着它更多地依赖于几只大猩猩来维持反弹。虽然收益率没有达到我们去年春天看到的那种水平,但收益率与 FAANG 之间的关系值得关注,以了解市场下一步的走势。</blockquote></p><p> If inflation growth is actually slowing—and one CPI report isn’t a trend—that could drive optimism that the Fed won’t clamp down right away, perhaps keeping yields from overheating and mega-caps from melting down. Now the PPI report may have people rethinking that. The tug of war continues.</p><p><blockquote>如果通胀增长真的在放缓--一份 CPI 报告并不是一种趋势--这可能会引发人们的乐观情绪,即美联储不会立即收紧货币政策,或许可以防止收益率过热,防止巨型股融化。现在PPI报告可能会让人们重新思考这个问题。拉锯战仍在继续。</blockquote></p><p> <h2>The Sweet And The Sour Impact Of Washington</h2> Stocks got a nice assist from Congress earlier this week when the Senate passed the infrastructure bill. On the opposite side of the equation, markets seem to be ignoring a debate in Congress over the debt ceiling. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen encouraged the parties to find a solution, and for now, the thinking on Wall Street seems to be that there will be one. However, that doesn’t mean a smooth process.</p><p><blockquote><h2>华盛顿的酸甜苦辣影响</h2>本周早些时候,当参议院通过基础设施法案时,股市得到了国会的大力帮助。另一方面,市场似乎忽略了国会关于债务上限的辩论。财政部长珍妮特·耶伦鼓励各方找到解决方案,目前华尔街的想法似乎是会有一个解决方案。然而,这并不意味着一个顺利的过程。</blockquote></p><p> There was eventually a solution in 2011, too, and the U.S. didn’t default on its debt payments. But it did see its credit rating lowered, and stocks took a pounding that summer. We’ll see if Congress can avoid getting to that point this time around. As a reminder, the debt ceiling has been raised numerous times since the 1980s, with both parties voting to do so. The last time was in 2019, under President Trump.</p><p><blockquote>2011 年最终也找到了解决方案,美国没有拖欠债务。但它的信用评级确实被下调,那年夏天股市遭受重创。我们将拭目以待,看看国会这次能否避免走到这一步。提醒一下,自20世纪80年代以来,债务上限已经多次提高,两党都投票支持这样做。上一次是在2019年,在特朗普总统的领导下。</blockquote></p><p> If the debt ceiling fight starts to ramp up, volatility could eventually return. It’s not really a big factor right now, but don’t be surprised if we see some intraday volatility continue in the coming weeks.</p><p><blockquote>如果债务上限之争开始升级,波动性最终可能会卷土重来。目前这并不是一个大因素,但如果我们在未来几周看到盘中继续出现波动,请不要感到惊讶。</blockquote></p><p> You saw the beginnings of that the last couple of weeks, where we’d be up significantly in the morning and sell back off. Or be down significantly in the morning and rally back. We’re probably going to see that pattern continue because besides awaiting the next steps on the infrastructure bill, the market still awaits clarity from the Fed. And even though this bill is exciting, that clarity from the Fed is arguably the big cloud that everything else operates underneath right now as far as the market is concerned.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几周里,你已经看到了这种情况的开始,我们早上会大幅上涨,然后回落。或者早上大幅下跌并反弹。我们可能会看到这种模式继续下去,因为除了等待基础设施法案的下一步措施外,市场还在等待美联储的明确表态。尽管这项法案令人兴奋,但就市场而言,美联储的澄清可以说是目前其他一切都在其下运作的大乌云。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, yesterday Kansas City Fed President Esther George said it was time for the central bank to begin pulling back its bond-buying program. There’s been similar language from other Fed officials recently. No single person at the Fed sets policy, but at least a few seem to be chomping at the bit, so to speak, to start tapering.</p><p><blockquote>例如,昨天堪萨斯城联储主席埃丝特·乔治表示,美联储是时候开始撤回债券购买计划了。最近,其他美联储官员也发表了类似的言论。美联储没有一个人制定政策,但至少有几个人似乎正在迫不及待地开始缩减规模。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://tickertapecdn.tdameritrade.com/assets/images/pages/md/2021-08-12-chart.png\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"412\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>CHART OF THE DAY: WHAT’S YOUR 50? Though it’s been a while since the S&P 500 Index (SPX—candlestick) suffered a setback, it’s worth noting that mid-month has been tough for it the last few months. That doesn’t mean there’s a selloff ahead, only that you might want to prepare for one if the pattern persists. Assuming things run into trouble, the level to watch is the 50-day moving average (blue line), which currently rests about 3% below the index. That’s pretty much how far things fell in mid-July when the last selloff occurred before the SPX bounced off of that 50-day MA. Data Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices. Chart source: The thinkorswim® platform. For illustrative purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>每日图表: 你的 50 是多少?虽然标普500指数(SPX-Candlestick)已经有一段时间没有遭遇挫折了,但值得注意的是,在过去的几个月里,月中对它来说一直很艰难。这并不意味着未来会出现抛售,只是如果这种模式持续下去,你可能需要做好抛售准备。假设事情遇到麻烦,需要关注的水平是 50 天移动平均线(蓝线),目前该平均线比指数低约 3%。7 月中旬,在 SPX 指数从 50 日均线反弹之前,最后一次抛售发生在 7 月中旬。数据来源:标准普尔道琼斯指数。图表来源:The thinkorswim®平台。仅用于说明目的。过去的表现并不能保证未来的结果。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A Tale Of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Earnings And Reopening: </b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">Two</a> earnings reports out this week help illustrate how people are still eager to get out of their homes despite Delta variant fears. First,<b> Ebay</b> (NASDAQ:EBAY) gave some muted Q3 guidance because people don’t want to stay home checking online auctions. Then dating site<b> Bumble</b> (NASDAQ:BMBL) did better than expected, also because people want to get out. This can show us two things. First, there’s still a lot of pent-up demand to get back to normal. Number two, EBAY might give us insight into what to expect from other retailers, especially those who rely a lot on digital, when retail earnings season gets underway in earnest next week.</p><p><blockquote><b>一个故事<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">二</a>盈利和重新开业:</b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">二</a>本周发布的收益报告有助于说明,尽管担心德尔塔变异毒株,人们仍然渴望走出家门。首先,<b>易趣</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:EBAY)给出了一些低调的第三季度指引,因为人们不想呆在家里查看网上拍卖。然后交友网站<b>邦布尔</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:BMBL)的表现好于预期,也是因为人们想走出去。这可以告诉我们两件事。首先,仍有许多被压抑的需求需要恢复正常。第二,当下周零售财报季正式开始时,易贝可能会让我们深入了解其他零售商,尤其是那些严重依赖数字的零售商。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Patience Could Be A Virtue With Infrastructure Stocks: </b>Companies like <b>U.S. Steel </b>(NYSE:X), <b>General Electric</b> (NYSE:GE), and <b>Cleveland-Cliffs</b> (NYSE:CLF) all had a nice bump this week on the Senate’s infrastructure bill passage. But remember, this isn’t something that’s going to hit the economy for a while. If you’re looking longer term as an investor and you want to own these stocks for a few years, that’s probably where the bigger opportunity is. In the shorter term, you could see an initial bump, and then maybe a little bit of a flattening out.</p><p><blockquote><b>对于基础设施股来说,耐心可能是一种优点:</b>公司喜欢<b>美国钢铁公司</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:X),<b>通用电气</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:GE),以及<b>克利夫兰悬崖</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:CLF)本周,参议院通过了基础设施法案,所有人都大受欢迎。但请记住,这不会在一段时间内影响经济。如果你是一名长期投资者,想持有这些股票几年,那么这可能是更大的机会所在。在短期内,你可能会看到最初的颠簸,然后可能会有一点变平。</blockquote></p><p> It could take six or nine months before you actually start to see some shovel-ready projects or even some of the architectural and engineering firms starting to lay all of this out. It is a huge undertaking. Long term, it could have a big impact on some of those companies. But again, it takes a while to get going.<b> </b></p><p><blockquote>可能需要六到九个月的时间,你才会真正开始看到一些现成的项目,甚至一些建筑和工程公司开始展示所有这些。这是一项艰巨的任务。从长远来看,这可能会对其中一些公司产生重大影响。但是,这需要一段时间才能开始。<b> </b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Not Enough Gloom For Gold To Shine?</b> The traditional clash between market fundamentalists and chart technicians came to a head over gold at the skirmish zone of $1,670 an ounce range. Why $1,670? For “technical” traders, that price marks the critical 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level. If this makes no sense to you at all, as it is slightly complex for the uninitiated, just assume that it’s nearing the<i> uncle point</i> where either bulls pile in and prevail (which it appears they did), or they flee, dumping their long positions as bears overrun them.</p><p><blockquote><b>黑暗不足以让金子发光?</b>市场原教旨主义者和图表技术人员之间的传统冲突在每盎司 1,670 美元区间的冲突区域对黄金造成了严重影响。为什么是1670美元?对于 “技术 ”交易者来说,该价格标志着关键的 61.8% 斐波那契回撤位。如果这对你来说毫无意义,因为对于外行人来说有点复杂,那就假设它接近<i>点叔叔</i>要么多头涌入并获胜(看起来他们做到了),要么他们逃离,在空头压倒他们时抛售多头头寸。</blockquote></p><p> The $1,670 range was tested twice before, in March, with bulls gaining the upper hand each time. But even that wasn’t enough to stem the tide of “risk-on” sentiment, leading to the fundamental vs technical commotion before yesterday’s Consumer Price Index and today’s Producer Price Index reports—both inflationary gauges; and gold, a traditional inflationary hedge. With not enough gloom to glide gold’s flight, will this week’s inflationary readings cause gold to shine or sizzle?</p><p><blockquote>1,670 美元区间此前在 3 月份曾两次测试,每次多头都占据上风。但即便如此,也不足以遏制 “冒险 ”情绪的浪潮,导致在昨天的消费者价格指数和今天的生产者价格指数报告(这两份报告都是通胀指标)之前,基本面与技术面的混乱;以及黄金,一种传统的通胀对冲工具。由于不足以阻碍黄金飞涨,本周的通胀数据会让黄金大放异彩吗?</blockquote></p><p> TD Ameritrade® commentary for educational purposes only. Member SIPC.</p><p><blockquote>德美利证券®评论仅用于教育目的。SIPC成员。</blockquote></p><p> Image by Alessandro D'Andrea from Pixabay</p><p><blockquote>图片由 Alessandro D'Andrea 提供,来自 Pixabay</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>A Three-Prong Crucible? Markets Eye Record Highs Amid Inflation, Fiscal, And Delta Uncertainty<blockquote>三叉坩埚?由于通胀、财政和三角洲的不确定性,市场关注历史新高</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nA Three-Prong Crucible? Markets Eye Record Highs Amid Inflation, Fiscal, And Delta Uncertainty<blockquote>三叉坩埚?由于通胀、财政和三角洲的不确定性,市场关注历史新高</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-12 22:14</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Yesterday the market got behind the Fed’s idea that inflation is transitory after a calm consumer price index (CPI) reading.</p><p><blockquote>昨天,在消费者价格指数(CPI)数据平静之后,市场支持美联储的观点,即通胀是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> Will that change today after a sizzling producer price index (PPI) reading? Remember that any gains in PPI can often get reflected in CPI down the road as companies react to higher wholesale prices by passing them along to the consumer. And then there’s the other side of the coin—where companies absorb these prices, which can impact margins. Either way, inflation tends to pack a wallop.</p><p><blockquote>在火热的生产者价格指数(PPI)读数之后,今天这种情况会改变吗?请记住,PPI 的任何上涨通常都会反映在未来的 CPI 中,因为公司会通过将批发价格转嫁给消费者来应对更高的批发价格。还有硬币的另一面--公司吸收这些价格,这可能会影响利润率。不管怎样,通货膨胀往往会造成沉重打击。</blockquote></p><p> Major indices didn’t immediately react much to a July PPI reading of 1%, which was way above the Wall Street analyst consensus of 0.5%. That followed yesterday’s CPI coming in about as expected and well below the June level. The July PPI was equal to June’s, so that kind of takes a bit of the transitory argument away. Also, core PPI, which strips out volatile energy and food prices, was the same as the headline figure, so there’s no hiding behind that.</p><p><blockquote>主要股指对 7 月份 PPI 读数为 1%(远高于华尔街分析师一致认为的 0.5%)没有立即做出太大反应。在此之前,昨天的 CPI 基本符合预期,远低于 6 月份的水平。7 月份的 PPI 与 6 月份持平,因此这在一定程度上消除了暂时性的论点。此外,剔除波动较大的能源和食品价格的核心 PPI 与总体数字相同,因此这背后没有任何隐瞒。</blockquote></p><p> The PPI report is just the start of today’s action. Later on, <b>Disney </b>(NYSE:DIS) steps onto center stage with its earnings report. Focus is likely to be on streaming and whether the Delta variant might slow attendance gains at theme parks and movie theaters. It’s likely DIS executives will be asked how the big jump in Florida cases is affecting the Magic Kingdom in Orlando.</p><p><blockquote>PPI 报告只是今天行动的开始。后来,<b>迪士尼</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:DIS)凭借其收益报告登上中心舞台。焦点可能是流媒体以及德尔塔变异毒株是否会减缓主题公园和电影院的上座率增长。DIS 的高管们很可能会被问到佛罗里达州案件的大幅增加对奥兰多的魔法王国有何影响。</blockquote></p><p> Weekly jobless claims of 375,000 were more in line with estimates and pretty much down the middle compared with recent numbers. There doesn’t seem to be much improvement going on here, but it’s not getting worse, either. The number probably won’t have much influence today.</p><p><blockquote>每周申请失业救济人数为 375,000 人,更符合预期,与最近的数字相比,几乎处于中间位置。这里的情况似乎没有太大改善,但也没有变得更糟。这个数字在今天可能不会有太大影响。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, investors are likely to spend their time trying to make sense of these contrasting inflation indicators, which might explain why major indices initially went nowhere in pre-market trading on the PPI reading. Does this strong PPI give the Fed more reason to begin its tapering earlier than expected, or will the Fed wait for another month of data to try and get more clarity? If history means anything, we can probably bet on option two.</p><p><blockquote>相反,投资者可能会花时间试图理解这些对比鲜明的通胀指标,这可能解释了为什么主要指数最初在PPI读数的盘前交易中一事无成。这种强劲的PPI是否给了美联储更多比预期更早开始缩减规模的理由,还是美联储会再等待一个月的数据来试图获得更多的清晰度?如果历史意味着什么,我们或许可以押注选项二。</blockquote></p><p> <h2>Inflationary Showdown Shows Slight Slowdown</h2> Wednesday’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) report told investors mostly what they already knew: overall inflation is running hot. But that’s not what the market was keen to focus on. Instead, investors appeared to be looking at the core CPI, which jumped 4.3% year over year as expected but only 0.3% on a monthly basis—a tad less than the 0.4% analysts estimated.</p><p><blockquote><h2>通胀摊牌显示略有放缓</h2>周三的消费者价格指数(CPI)报告告诉了投资者他们已经知道的大部分信息: 整体通胀正在升温。但这并不是市场热衷于关注的问题。相反,投资者似乎正在关注核心 CPI,该指数如预期同比上涨 4.3%,但环比仅上涨 0.3%,略低于分析师预期的 0.4%。</blockquote></p><p> On top of this, the Fed’s “transitory” narrative suddenly seemed a bit more believable as a slowdown in used car prices likely allayed fears of a monetary sudden-brake shock. Used car prices rose only 0.2% in July, a small bump compared to the prior month’s steep 10% surge.</p><p><blockquote>除此之外,美联储的 “过渡性 ”说法突然显得更可信了,因为二手车价格放缓可能会减轻人们对货币急刹车冲击的担忧。7 月份二手车价格仅上涨 0.2%,与上月 10% 的大幅飙升相比,涨幅不大。</blockquote></p><p> But again, this morning’s PPI seems to be at least a partial counterargument to the transitory view. A single month’s data isn’t a trend, but this is certainly <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to keep an eye on.</p><p><blockquote>不过,今天上午的 PPI 似乎至少是对短暂观点的部分反驳。单月数据不是趋势,但这肯定是趋势<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>留意。</blockquote></p><p> Following the CPI report, the <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average </b>($DJI) jumped as much as 200 points, with <b>Caterpillar </b>(NYSE:CAT) and <b>Home Depot</b> (NYSE:HD) leading the index, while 10-year Treasury yields stood mostly flat, and “FAANG” stocks slid into negative territory, with the exception of <b>Apple </b>(NASDAQ:AAPL). Could it be that fears of a “too-laid-back” Fed policy are starting to morph into a “just right” Goldilocks scenario?</p><p><blockquote>继CPI报告之后,<b>道琼斯工业指数</b>($DJI) 上涨多达 200 点,<b>卡特彼勒</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:CAT)和<b>家得宝</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:HD)领涨该指数,而 10 年期国债收益率基本持平,“FAANG”股票滑入负值区域,但 10 年期国债收益率除外。<b>苹果</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:AAPL)会不会是对美联储 “过于宽松 ”政策的担忧开始演变成 “恰到好处 ”的金发姑娘情景?</blockquote></p><p> Big cyclical sectors like Energy and Financials were already on the upswing this week even before yesterday’s bullish CPI data. Strength in these sectors helped give the blue-chip <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b> ($DJI) a lift so far over the other major indices.</p><p><blockquote>甚至在昨天看涨的 CPI 数据公布之前,能源和金融等大型周期性行业本周就已经开始上涨。这些板块的强势帮助蓝筹股<b>道琼斯工业指数</b>($DJI) 迄今为止,涨幅高于其他主要指数。</blockquote></p><p> <h2>Small-Caps Still Scuffling</h2> So where does that leave small-caps, which are often known for their solid performance during economic recoveries? The small-cap <b>Russell 2000 Index</b> (RUT) is still scuffling a bit, pretty much flat so far this month and well below its 2021 highs. It did rise a bit on Wednesday, but again got outpaced by the $DJI. It’s basically still stuck in a volatile 5-month “rut” despite the strong and steady doses of easy-money policy.</p><p><blockquote><h2>小盘股仍在混战</h2>那么,小盘股在经济复苏期间通常以稳健的表现而闻名,这将给小盘股带来什么影响呢?小盘股<b>罗素2000指数</b>(RUT)仍然有点混战,本月到目前为止基本持平,远低于 2021 年的高点。周三确实有所上涨,但再次被 DJI 美元超越。尽管实行了强有力且稳定的宽松货币政策,但它基本上仍停留在 5 个月的不稳定 “常态”中。</blockquote></p><p> It might be worth watching to see if RUT can break out of the slow pattern it entered after emerging from its early summer selloff. Which way RUT goes from here might help provide clues about the market as a whole, because RUT can be an early leader up or down.</p><p><blockquote>RUT 能否摆脱初夏抛售后进入的缓慢模式可能值得关注。RUT 今后的走向可能有助于提供有关整个市场的线索,因为 RUT 可能是上涨或下跌的早期领导者。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Another consideration is where the FAANG stocks go if Treasury yields resume their climb. Remember that earlier this year, rising yields appeared to take a big bite out of the “mega-cap” Tech stocks, with AAPL and<b> Tesla</b> (NASDAQ:TSLA) among that hit hardest. It’s fine to say that Financials and Energy can pick up the slack, but that ignores the fact that the FAANGs—like it or not—comprise about 20% of the value of the SPX. That means any significant setbacks for these huge companies could drag the overall index.</p><p><blockquote>另一个考虑因素是,如果美国国债收益率恢复攀升,FAANG 股票将走向何方。请记住,今年早些时候,收益率上升似乎对 “巨型 ”科技股造成了沉重打击,苹果公司和<b>特斯拉</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:TSLA)是受影响最严重的公司之一。可以说金融和能源可以弥补这一不足,但这忽略了一个事实,即 FAANG--不管你喜不喜欢--约占 SPX 价值的 20%。这意味着这些大公司的任何重大挫折都可能拖累整体指数。</blockquote></p><p> Since May, mega-cap Techs have been helping pull up the SPX while some of the other sectors struggle. Analysts are talking about how the rally has less “depth,” meaning it’s more dependent on a few big gorillas to keep it going. While yields aren’t in the kind of territory we saw last spring, it’s worth watching that relationship between yields and FAANGs for clues about where the market goes next.</p><p><blockquote>自 5 月份以来,大型科技股一直在帮助拉高 SPX,而其他一些行业则陷入困境。分析师们正在谈论这次反弹的 “深度”越来越小,这意味着它更多地依赖于几只大猩猩来维持反弹。虽然收益率没有达到我们去年春天看到的那种水平,但收益率与 FAANG 之间的关系值得关注,以了解市场下一步的走势。</blockquote></p><p> If inflation growth is actually slowing—and one CPI report isn’t a trend—that could drive optimism that the Fed won’t clamp down right away, perhaps keeping yields from overheating and mega-caps from melting down. Now the PPI report may have people rethinking that. The tug of war continues.</p><p><blockquote>如果通胀增长真的在放缓--一份 CPI 报告并不是一种趋势--这可能会引发人们的乐观情绪,即美联储不会立即收紧货币政策,或许可以防止收益率过热,防止巨型股融化。现在PPI报告可能会让人们重新思考这个问题。拉锯战仍在继续。</blockquote></p><p> <h2>The Sweet And The Sour Impact Of Washington</h2> Stocks got a nice assist from Congress earlier this week when the Senate passed the infrastructure bill. On the opposite side of the equation, markets seem to be ignoring a debate in Congress over the debt ceiling. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen encouraged the parties to find a solution, and for now, the thinking on Wall Street seems to be that there will be one. However, that doesn’t mean a smooth process.</p><p><blockquote><h2>华盛顿的酸甜苦辣影响</h2>本周早些时候,当参议院通过基础设施法案时,股市得到了国会的大力帮助。另一方面,市场似乎忽略了国会关于债务上限的辩论。财政部长珍妮特·耶伦鼓励各方找到解决方案,目前华尔街的想法似乎是会有一个解决方案。然而,这并不意味着一个顺利的过程。</blockquote></p><p> There was eventually a solution in 2011, too, and the U.S. didn’t default on its debt payments. But it did see its credit rating lowered, and stocks took a pounding that summer. We’ll see if Congress can avoid getting to that point this time around. As a reminder, the debt ceiling has been raised numerous times since the 1980s, with both parties voting to do so. The last time was in 2019, under President Trump.</p><p><blockquote>2011 年最终也找到了解决方案,美国没有拖欠债务。但它的信用评级确实被下调,那年夏天股市遭受重创。我们将拭目以待,看看国会这次能否避免走到这一步。提醒一下,自20世纪80年代以来,债务上限已经多次提高,两党都投票支持这样做。上一次是在2019年,在特朗普总统的领导下。</blockquote></p><p> If the debt ceiling fight starts to ramp up, volatility could eventually return. It’s not really a big factor right now, but don’t be surprised if we see some intraday volatility continue in the coming weeks.</p><p><blockquote>如果债务上限之争开始升级,波动性最终可能会卷土重来。目前这并不是一个大因素,但如果我们在未来几周看到盘中继续出现波动,请不要感到惊讶。</blockquote></p><p> You saw the beginnings of that the last couple of weeks, where we’d be up significantly in the morning and sell back off. Or be down significantly in the morning and rally back. We’re probably going to see that pattern continue because besides awaiting the next steps on the infrastructure bill, the market still awaits clarity from the Fed. And even though this bill is exciting, that clarity from the Fed is arguably the big cloud that everything else operates underneath right now as far as the market is concerned.</p><p><blockquote>在过去的几周里,你已经看到了这种情况的开始,我们早上会大幅上涨,然后回落。或者早上大幅下跌并反弹。我们可能会看到这种模式继续下去,因为除了等待基础设施法案的下一步措施外,市场还在等待美联储的明确表态。尽管这项法案令人兴奋,但就市场而言,美联储的澄清可以说是目前其他一切都在其下运作的大乌云。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, yesterday Kansas City Fed President Esther George said it was time for the central bank to begin pulling back its bond-buying program. There’s been similar language from other Fed officials recently. No single person at the Fed sets policy, but at least a few seem to be chomping at the bit, so to speak, to start tapering.</p><p><blockquote>例如,昨天堪萨斯城联储主席埃丝特·乔治表示,美联储是时候开始撤回债券购买计划了。最近,其他美联储官员也发表了类似的言论。美联储没有一个人制定政策,但至少有几个人似乎正在迫不及待地开始缩减规模。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://tickertapecdn.tdameritrade.com/assets/images/pages/md/2021-08-12-chart.png\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"412\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>CHART OF THE DAY: WHAT’S YOUR 50? Though it’s been a while since the S&P 500 Index (SPX—candlestick) suffered a setback, it’s worth noting that mid-month has been tough for it the last few months. That doesn’t mean there’s a selloff ahead, only that you might want to prepare for one if the pattern persists. Assuming things run into trouble, the level to watch is the 50-day moving average (blue line), which currently rests about 3% below the index. That’s pretty much how far things fell in mid-July when the last selloff occurred before the SPX bounced off of that 50-day MA. Data Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices. Chart source: The thinkorswim® platform. For illustrative purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>每日图表: 你的 50 是多少?虽然标普500指数(SPX-Candlestick)已经有一段时间没有遭遇挫折了,但值得注意的是,在过去的几个月里,月中对它来说一直很艰难。这并不意味着未来会出现抛售,只是如果这种模式持续下去,你可能需要做好抛售准备。假设事情遇到麻烦,需要关注的水平是 50 天移动平均线(蓝线),目前该平均线比指数低约 3%。7 月中旬,在 SPX 指数从 50 日均线反弹之前,最后一次抛售发生在 7 月中旬。数据来源:标准普尔道琼斯指数。图表来源:The thinkorswim®平台。仅用于说明目的。过去的表现并不能保证未来的结果。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A Tale Of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Earnings And Reopening: </b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">Two</a> earnings reports out this week help illustrate how people are still eager to get out of their homes despite Delta variant fears. First,<b> Ebay</b> (NASDAQ:EBAY) gave some muted Q3 guidance because people don’t want to stay home checking online auctions. Then dating site<b> Bumble</b> (NASDAQ:BMBL) did better than expected, also because people want to get out. This can show us two things. First, there’s still a lot of pent-up demand to get back to normal. Number two, EBAY might give us insight into what to expect from other retailers, especially those who rely a lot on digital, when retail earnings season gets underway in earnest next week.</p><p><blockquote><b>一个故事<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">二</a>盈利和重新开业:</b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">二</a>本周发布的收益报告有助于说明,尽管担心德尔塔变异毒株,人们仍然渴望走出家门。首先,<b>易趣</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:EBAY)给出了一些低调的第三季度指引,因为人们不想呆在家里查看网上拍卖。然后交友网站<b>邦布尔</b>(纳斯达克股票代码:BMBL)的表现好于预期,也是因为人们想走出去。这可以告诉我们两件事。首先,仍有许多被压抑的需求需要恢复正常。第二,当下周零售财报季正式开始时,易贝可能会让我们深入了解其他零售商,尤其是那些严重依赖数字的零售商。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>Patience Could Be A Virtue With Infrastructure Stocks: </b>Companies like <b>U.S. Steel </b>(NYSE:X), <b>General Electric</b> (NYSE:GE), and <b>Cleveland-Cliffs</b> (NYSE:CLF) all had a nice bump this week on the Senate’s infrastructure bill passage. But remember, this isn’t something that’s going to hit the economy for a while. If you’re looking longer term as an investor and you want to own these stocks for a few years, that’s probably where the bigger opportunity is. In the shorter term, you could see an initial bump, and then maybe a little bit of a flattening out.</p><p><blockquote><b>对于基础设施股来说,耐心可能是一种优点:</b>公司喜欢<b>美国钢铁公司</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:X),<b>通用电气</b>(纽约证券交易所代码:GE),以及<b>克利夫兰悬崖</b>(纽约证券交易所股票代码:CLF)本周,参议院通过了基础设施法案,所有人都大受欢迎。但请记住,这不会在一段时间内影响经济。如果你是一名长期投资者,想持有这些股票几年,那么这可能是更大的机会所在。在短期内,你可能会看到最初的颠簸,然后可能会有一点变平。</blockquote></p><p> It could take six or nine months before you actually start to see some shovel-ready projects or even some of the architectural and engineering firms starting to lay all of this out. It is a huge undertaking. Long term, it could have a big impact on some of those companies. But again, it takes a while to get going.<b> </b></p><p><blockquote>可能需要六到九个月的时间,你才会真正开始看到一些现成的项目,甚至一些建筑和工程公司开始展示所有这些。这是一项艰巨的任务。从长远来看,这可能会对其中一些公司产生重大影响。但是,这需要一段时间才能开始。<b> </b></blockquote></p><p> <b>Not Enough Gloom For Gold To Shine?</b> The traditional clash between market fundamentalists and chart technicians came to a head over gold at the skirmish zone of $1,670 an ounce range. Why $1,670? For “technical” traders, that price marks the critical 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level. If this makes no sense to you at all, as it is slightly complex for the uninitiated, just assume that it’s nearing the<i> uncle point</i> where either bulls pile in and prevail (which it appears they did), or they flee, dumping their long positions as bears overrun them.</p><p><blockquote><b>黑暗不足以让金子发光?</b>市场原教旨主义者和图表技术人员之间的传统冲突在每盎司 1,670 美元区间的冲突区域对黄金造成了严重影响。为什么是1670美元?对于 “技术 ”交易者来说,该价格标志着关键的 61.8% 斐波那契回撤位。如果这对你来说毫无意义,因为对于外行人来说有点复杂,那就假设它接近<i>点叔叔</i>要么多头涌入并获胜(看起来他们做到了),要么他们逃离,在空头压倒他们时抛售多头头寸。</blockquote></p><p> The $1,670 range was tested twice before, in March, with bulls gaining the upper hand each time. But even that wasn’t enough to stem the tide of “risk-on” sentiment, leading to the fundamental vs technical commotion before yesterday’s Consumer Price Index and today’s Producer Price Index reports—both inflationary gauges; and gold, a traditional inflationary hedge. With not enough gloom to glide gold’s flight, will this week’s inflationary readings cause gold to shine or sizzle?</p><p><blockquote>1,670 美元区间此前在 3 月份曾两次测试,每次多头都占据上风。但即便如此,也不足以遏制 “冒险 ”情绪的浪潮,导致在昨天的消费者价格指数和今天的生产者价格指数报告(这两份报告都是通胀指标)之前,基本面与技术面的混乱;以及黄金,一种传统的通胀对冲工具。由于不足以阻碍黄金飞涨,本周的通胀数据会让黄金大放异彩吗?</blockquote></p><p> TD Ameritrade® commentary for educational purposes only. Member SIPC.</p><p><blockquote>德美利证券®评论仅用于教育目的。SIPC成员。</blockquote></p><p> Image by Alessandro D'Andrea from Pixabay</p><p><blockquote>图片由 Alessandro D'Andrea 提供,来自 Pixabay</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EBAY":"eBay","DIS":"迪士尼","BMBL":"Bumble Inc.","CLF":"克利夫兰克里夫","HD":"家得宝","AAPL":"苹果","GE":"GE航空航天","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","CAT":"卡特彼勒","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158250170","content_text":"Yesterday the market got behind the Fed’s idea that inflation is transitory after a calm consumer price index (CPI) reading.\nWill that change today after a sizzling producer price index (PPI) reading? Remember that any gains in PPI can often get reflected in CPI down the road as companies react to higher wholesale prices by passing them along to the consumer. And then there’s the other side of the coin—where companies absorb these prices, which can impact margins. Either way, inflation tends to pack a wallop.\nMajor indices didn’t immediately react much to a July PPI reading of 1%, which was way above the Wall Street analyst consensus of 0.5%. That followed yesterday’s CPI coming in about as expected and well below the June level. The July PPI was equal to June’s, so that kind of takes a bit of the transitory argument away. Also, core PPI, which strips out volatile energy and food prices, was the same as the headline figure, so there’s no hiding behind that.\nThe PPI report is just the start of today’s action. Later on, Disney (NYSE:DIS) steps onto center stage with its earnings report. Focus is likely to be on streaming and whether the Delta variant might slow attendance gains at theme parks and movie theaters. It’s likely DIS executives will be asked how the big jump in Florida cases is affecting the Magic Kingdom in Orlando.\nWeekly jobless claims of 375,000 were more in line with estimates and pretty much down the middle compared with recent numbers. There doesn’t seem to be much improvement going on here, but it’s not getting worse, either. The number probably won’t have much influence today.\nInstead, investors are likely to spend their time trying to make sense of these contrasting inflation indicators, which might explain why major indices initially went nowhere in pre-market trading on the PPI reading. Does this strong PPI give the Fed more reason to begin its tapering earlier than expected, or will the Fed wait for another month of data to try and get more clarity? If history means anything, we can probably bet on option two.\nInflationary Showdown Shows Slight Slowdown\nWednesday’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) report told investors mostly what they already knew: overall inflation is running hot. But that’s not what the market was keen to focus on. Instead, investors appeared to be looking at the core CPI, which jumped 4.3% year over year as expected but only 0.3% on a monthly basis—a tad less than the 0.4% analysts estimated.\nOn top of this, the Fed’s “transitory” narrative suddenly seemed a bit more believable as a slowdown in used car prices likely allayed fears of a monetary sudden-brake shock. Used car prices rose only 0.2% in July, a small bump compared to the prior month’s steep 10% surge.\nBut again, this morning’s PPI seems to be at least a partial counterargument to the transitory view. A single month’s data isn’t a trend, but this is certainly one to keep an eye on.\nFollowing the CPI report, the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($DJI) jumped as much as 200 points, with Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) and Home Depot (NYSE:HD) leading the index, while 10-year Treasury yields stood mostly flat, and “FAANG” stocks slid into negative territory, with the exception of Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). Could it be that fears of a “too-laid-back” Fed policy are starting to morph into a “just right” Goldilocks scenario?\nBig cyclical sectors like Energy and Financials were already on the upswing this week even before yesterday’s bullish CPI data. Strength in these sectors helped give the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average ($DJI) a lift so far over the other major indices.\nSmall-Caps Still Scuffling\nSo where does that leave small-caps, which are often known for their solid performance during economic recoveries? The small-cap Russell 2000 Index (RUT) is still scuffling a bit, pretty much flat so far this month and well below its 2021 highs. It did rise a bit on Wednesday, but again got outpaced by the $DJI. It’s basically still stuck in a volatile 5-month “rut” despite the strong and steady doses of easy-money policy.\nIt might be worth watching to see if RUT can break out of the slow pattern it entered after emerging from its early summer selloff. Which way RUT goes from here might help provide clues about the market as a whole, because RUT can be an early leader up or down.\nAnother consideration is where the FAANG stocks go if Treasury yields resume their climb. Remember that earlier this year, rising yields appeared to take a big bite out of the “mega-cap” Tech stocks, with AAPL and Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) among that hit hardest. It’s fine to say that Financials and Energy can pick up the slack, but that ignores the fact that the FAANGs—like it or not—comprise about 20% of the value of the SPX. That means any significant setbacks for these huge companies could drag the overall index.\nSince May, mega-cap Techs have been helping pull up the SPX while some of the other sectors struggle. Analysts are talking about how the rally has less “depth,” meaning it’s more dependent on a few big gorillas to keep it going. While yields aren’t in the kind of territory we saw last spring, it’s worth watching that relationship between yields and FAANGs for clues about where the market goes next.\nIf inflation growth is actually slowing—and one CPI report isn’t a trend—that could drive optimism that the Fed won’t clamp down right away, perhaps keeping yields from overheating and mega-caps from melting down. Now the PPI report may have people rethinking that. The tug of war continues.\nThe Sweet And The Sour Impact Of Washington\nStocks got a nice assist from Congress earlier this week when the Senate passed the infrastructure bill. On the opposite side of the equation, markets seem to be ignoring a debate in Congress over the debt ceiling. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen encouraged the parties to find a solution, and for now, the thinking on Wall Street seems to be that there will be one. However, that doesn’t mean a smooth process.\nThere was eventually a solution in 2011, too, and the U.S. didn’t default on its debt payments. But it did see its credit rating lowered, and stocks took a pounding that summer. We’ll see if Congress can avoid getting to that point this time around. As a reminder, the debt ceiling has been raised numerous times since the 1980s, with both parties voting to do so. The last time was in 2019, under President Trump.\nIf the debt ceiling fight starts to ramp up, volatility could eventually return. It’s not really a big factor right now, but don’t be surprised if we see some intraday volatility continue in the coming weeks.\nYou saw the beginnings of that the last couple of weeks, where we’d be up significantly in the morning and sell back off. Or be down significantly in the morning and rally back. We’re probably going to see that pattern continue because besides awaiting the next steps on the infrastructure bill, the market still awaits clarity from the Fed. And even though this bill is exciting, that clarity from the Fed is arguably the big cloud that everything else operates underneath right now as far as the market is concerned.\nFor instance, yesterday Kansas City Fed President Esther George said it was time for the central bank to begin pulling back its bond-buying program. There’s been similar language from other Fed officials recently. No single person at the Fed sets policy, but at least a few seem to be chomping at the bit, so to speak, to start tapering.\nCHART OF THE DAY: WHAT’S YOUR 50? Though it’s been a while since the S&P 500 Index (SPX—candlestick) suffered a setback, it’s worth noting that mid-month has been tough for it the last few months. That doesn’t mean there’s a selloff ahead, only that you might want to prepare for one if the pattern persists. Assuming things run into trouble, the level to watch is the 50-day moving average (blue line), which currently rests about 3% below the index. That’s pretty much how far things fell in mid-July when the last selloff occurred before the SPX bounced off of that 50-day MA. Data Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices. Chart source: The thinkorswim® platform. For illustrative purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.\nA Tale Of Two Earnings And Reopening: Two earnings reports out this week help illustrate how people are still eager to get out of their homes despite Delta variant fears. First, Ebay (NASDAQ:EBAY) gave some muted Q3 guidance because people don’t want to stay home checking online auctions. Then dating site Bumble (NASDAQ:BMBL) did better than expected, also because people want to get out. This can show us two things. First, there’s still a lot of pent-up demand to get back to normal. Number two, EBAY might give us insight into what to expect from other retailers, especially those who rely a lot on digital, when retail earnings season gets underway in earnest next week.\nPatience Could Be A Virtue With Infrastructure Stocks: Companies like U.S. Steel (NYSE:X), General Electric (NYSE:GE), and Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) all had a nice bump this week on the Senate’s infrastructure bill passage. But remember, this isn’t something that’s going to hit the economy for a while. If you’re looking longer term as an investor and you want to own these stocks for a few years, that’s probably where the bigger opportunity is. In the shorter term, you could see an initial bump, and then maybe a little bit of a flattening out.\nIt could take six or nine months before you actually start to see some shovel-ready projects or even some of the architectural and engineering firms starting to lay all of this out. It is a huge undertaking. Long term, it could have a big impact on some of those companies. But again, it takes a while to get going. \nNot Enough Gloom For Gold To Shine? The traditional clash between market fundamentalists and chart technicians came to a head over gold at the skirmish zone of $1,670 an ounce range. Why $1,670? For “technical” traders, that price marks the critical 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level. If this makes no sense to you at all, as it is slightly complex for the uninitiated, just assume that it’s nearing the uncle point where either bulls pile in and prevail (which it appears they did), or they flee, dumping their long positions as bears overrun them.\nThe $1,670 range was tested twice before, in March, with bulls gaining the upper hand each time. But even that wasn’t enough to stem the tide of “risk-on” sentiment, leading to the fundamental vs technical commotion before yesterday’s Consumer Price Index and today’s Producer Price Index reports—both inflationary gauges; and gold, a traditional inflationary hedge. With not enough gloom to glide gold’s flight, will this week’s inflationary readings cause gold to shine or sizzle?\nTD Ameritrade® commentary for educational purposes only. Member SIPC.\nImage by Alessandro D'Andrea from Pixabay","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HD":0.9,"X":0.9,"CAT":0.9,"GE":0.9,"CLF":0.9,"EBAY":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"BMBL":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819513475,"gmtCreate":1630076722497,"gmtModify":1704955666126,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/819513475","repostId":"2162021300","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":453,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":834225805,"gmtCreate":1629808577407,"gmtModify":1633682306405,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Alright ","listText":"Alright ","text":"Alright","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/834225805","repostId":"2161085167","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":551,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893625905,"gmtCreate":1628260441207,"gmtModify":1633752147703,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893625905","repostId":"2157649395","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":633,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":834225576,"gmtCreate":1629808631395,"gmtModify":1633682306183,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/834225576","repostId":"1183629667","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":633,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819515217,"gmtCreate":1630076882439,"gmtModify":1704955673219,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/819515217","repostId":"2162029756","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":540,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810404853,"gmtCreate":1629989824272,"gmtModify":1704954307279,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/810404853","repostId":"2162970560","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893650527,"gmtCreate":1628260563169,"gmtModify":1633752144824,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like…","listText":"Like…","text":"Like…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893650527","repostId":"1183941926","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183941926","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628255252,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1183941926?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How 10 of the world’s smartest investors can help you build your perfect portfolio<blockquote>全球 10 位最聪明的投资者如何帮助您建立完美的投资组合</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183941926","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Listen to Jeremy Siegel, Charles Ellis, Jack Bogle, Robert Shiller and others.The other four are portfolio managers, investors and bestselling authors who have sold millions of investment books, including The Vanguard Group’s founder Jack Bogle; the “Bond Guru,” Marty Leibowitz; the “Wisest Man on Wall Street” and Greenwich Associates founder Charles Ellis; and the “Wizard of Wharton,” Jeremy Siegel.As the creator of the first index mutual fund, Bogle’s portfolio was all about stock and bond ind","content":"<p> <b>Listen to Jeremy Siegel, Charles Ellis, Jack Bogle, Robert Shiller and others.</b> Is there a Perfect Portfolio for investors?</p><p><blockquote><b>听听杰里米·西格尔、查尔斯·埃利斯、杰克·博格尔、罗伯特·席勒等人的声音。</b>投资者有没有完美的投资组合?</blockquote></p><p> We posed this question to 10 of the most respected pioneers in the investment community. Six have Nobel Prizes in Economics: Harry Markowitz, the founder of Modern Portfolio Theory, the basis of the modern investment portfolio; his protégé William Sharpe, creator of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the beta risk measure that changed how we think about risk and reward in the financial markets; Eugene Fama, who developed the Efficient Market Hypothesis; Myron Scholes and Robert Merton, two of the co-creators of the Black-Scholes/Merton option pricing model; and Robert Shiller, the behavioral economist whose work challenged the notion of market efficiency.</p><p><blockquote>我们向投资界最受尊敬的10位先驱提出了这个问题。6人获得诺贝尔经济学奖:现代投资组合理论的创始人哈里·马科维茨,现代投资组合的基础;他的门徒威廉·夏普 (William Sharpe),资本资产定价模型 (CAPM) 和贝塔风险度量的创始人,改变了我们对金融市场风险和回报的看法;尤金·法马,他提出了有效市场假说;布莱克-斯科尔斯/默顿期权定价模型的两位共同创始人迈伦·斯科尔斯和罗伯特·默顿;还有行为经济学家罗伯特·席勒,他的工作挑战了市场效率的概念。</blockquote></p><p> The other four are portfolio managers, investors and bestselling authors who have sold millions of investment books, including The Vanguard Group’s founder Jack Bogle; the “Bond Guru,” Marty Leibowitz; the “Wisest Man on Wall Street” and Greenwich Associates founder Charles Ellis; and the “Wizard of Wharton,” Jeremy Siegel.</p><p><blockquote>另外四位是投资组合经理、投资者和畅销书作家,他们已售出数百万本投资书籍,其中包括先锋集团创始人杰克-博格尔(Jack Bogle);“邦德大师”马蒂-莱博维茨;“华尔街最聪明的人”、格林威治联合公司创始人查尔斯-埃利斯;还有 “沃顿商学院巫师 ”杰里米-西格尔。</blockquote></p><p> It’s no surprise that there isn’t consensus among their suggestions, given their varied backgrounds and interests. The different viewpoints of these financial luminaries illustrate the complexity of portfolio management—one size clearly doesn’t fit all.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于他们的背景和兴趣各不相同,他们的建议没有达成共识也就不足为奇了。这些金融名人的不同观点说明了投资组合管理的复杂性--一个尺寸显然不适合所有人。</blockquote></p><p> Think of the Perfect Portfolios of our experts as building blocks for your own Perfect Portfolio, collectively capable of accommodating the goals and constraints of all investors, if used in the right combination.</p><p><blockquote>将我们专家的完美投资组合视为您自己的完美投资组合的基石,如果结合使用得当,这些投资组合能够满足所有投资者的目标和限制。</blockquote></p><p> Markowitz suggests that first and foremost, you should diversify. Focus only on portfolios of securities, and in particular, those that have the highest level of expected returns for a given level of risk, Markowitz’s famous efficient frontier. The same concept applies across asset classes like bonds, real estate and commodities. The key for the investor is to find securities and asset classes with low correlations to each other, so that movements in one are not necessarily reflected in the others.</p><p><blockquote>马科维茨建议,首先也是最重要的,你应该多元化。只关注证券投资组合,尤其是那些在给定风险水平下具有最高预期回报水平的证券投资组合,即马科维茨著名的有效前沿。同样的概念也适用于债券、房地产和大宗商品等资产类别。对投资者来说,关键是找到彼此相关性较低的证券和资产类别,这样其中一个类别的变动就不一定反映在其他类别中。</blockquote></p><p> Sharpe’s Perfect Portfolio is just what his famous Capital Asset Pricing Model suggests: investing in the market as a whole. Sharpe recommends a U.S. total stock market fund, a non-U.S. total stock market fund, a U.S. total bond market fund, and a non-U.S. total bond market fund.</p><p><blockquote>夏普的完美投资组合正是他著名的资本资产定价模型所暗示的:投资于整个市场。夏普推荐美国总股票市场基金、非美国总股票市场基金、美国总债券市场基金和非美国总债券市场基金。</blockquote></p><p> Fama and his collaborator Ken French created a model that starts with Sharpe’s CAPM and augments it with two other factors. One captures the difference in returns between value and growth stocks, while the other captures the difference between stocks in companies with small and large market capitalizations. Fama suggests tilting your diversified portfolio toward value stocks and small-cap stocks, both of which tend to do well over time.</p><p><blockquote>Fama 和他的合作者 Ken French 创建了一个模型,该模型从夏普的 CAPM 开始,然后添加了另外两个因素。一个捕捉了价值股和成长型股票之间的回报差异,而另一个捕捉了小市值和大市值公司股票之间的差异。Fama 建议您将多元化投资组合倾向于价值股和小盘股,这两种股票随着时间的推移往往会表现良好。</blockquote></p><p> As the creator of the first index mutual fund, Bogle’s portfolio was all about stock and bond index funds, such as Vanguard’s ETF that tracks the S&P 500 index SPX, +0.60%. His mantra was to lower your costs through index funds and not take actions that might destroy value: “Don’t do something, just stand there!”</p><p><blockquote>作为第一只指数共同基金的创始人,博格尔的投资组合全部是股票和债券指数基金,例如先锋集团追踪标普500指数 SPX 的 ETF,涨幅为 0.60%。他的口头禅是通过指数基金降低成本,不要采取可能破坏价值的行动: “什么都不做,就站在那里!”</blockquote></p><p> For Scholes, the Perfect Portfolio is about risk management. Your investment success will depend most on avoiding the downside “tail risks,” rare but severe stock market downturns such as the financial crisis of 2007–2009 or the COVID-19 pandemic, while capitalizing on the positive “tail gains.”</p><p><blockquote>对于斯科尔斯来说,完美的投资组合就是风险管理。您的投资成功在很大程度上取决于避免下行的 “尾部风险”,即罕见但严重的股市低迷,如 2007-2009 年的金融危机或 COVID-19 大流行病,同时利用积极的 “尾部收益 ”。</blockquote></p><p> Pay attention to what the derivatives markets such as the VIX volatility index VIX, -1.39% are telling you. For example, when the VIX is at a level below its historical average, you may feel more comfortable investing a greater proportion of your assets in risky stocks.</p><p><blockquote>注意衍生品市场,如VIX波动率指数VIX,-1.39%告诉你什么。例如,当 VIX 处于低于历史平均水平的水平时,您可能会更愿意将更大比例的资产投资于风险股票。</blockquote></p><p> For Merton, ultimately, the Perfect Portfolio should be your very own risk-free asset, like the inflation-protected government bond TIPS. For your retirement goal, ideally you would take your savings at retirement, and buy an annuity that would provide a lifetime income to meet your anticipated needs.</p><p><blockquote>对于默顿来说,最终,完美的投资组合应该是你自己的无风险资产,就像通胀保值政府债券提示一样。对于你的退休目标,理想情况下,你会在退休时拿出你的储蓄,购买一份年金,提供一生的收入来满足你的预期需求。</blockquote></p><p> Leibowitz’s Perfect Portfolio is about the amount of risk you can personally bear. Be prepared to try to make some tough judgment calls, and consider all of your circumstances, including potential life events, current taxes and estate taxes. In addition to equities, you should include bonds to reduce its overall volatility. Have a contingency plan to deal with serious adverse events.</p><p><blockquote>莱博维茨的完美投资组合是关于你个人能够承受的风险大小。准备好尝试做出一些艰难的判断评级,并考虑您的所有情况,包括潜在的生活事件、当前税收和遗产税。除了股票,你还应该包括债券,以降低其整体波动性。有应对严重不良事件的应急预案。</blockquote></p><p> For Shiller, your Perfect Portfolio should be widely diversified, not only across major asset classes, but internationally as well. Place a heavier than typical weight in stocks around the world, where Shiller’s CAPE ratios—that is, cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratios—are relatively low.</p><p><blockquote>对于席勒来说,你的完美投资组合应该广泛多元化,不仅是主要资产类别,而且是国际上的。对世界各地的股票给予比通常更重的权重,因为这些地区的席勒开普比率--即周期性调整后的市盈率--相对较低。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For Ellis, one of the original advocates of passive investing, your Perfect Portfolio should of course include index funds, especially if you want to have a good chance of being in the top 20% of funds over the next 20 years. You should invest in bond index funds and low-cost international index funds, such as the MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) index. Pay attention to your taxes.</p><p><blockquote>对于被动投资的最初倡导者之一埃利斯来说,你的完美投资组合当然应该包括指数基金,特别是如果你想在未来20年内有很好的机会进入前20%的基金。您应该投资债券指数基金和低成本国际指数基金,例如 MSCI EAFE(欧洲、澳大拉西亚和远东)指数。注意你的税收。</blockquote></p><p> And Siegel encourages you to have reasonable expectations in line with financial history, no surprise for the author of the bestselling “Stocks for the Long Run”. The longer your investment horizon, the greater proportion of your Perfect Portfolio should be in stocks. Consider developing-country stocks. For fixed-income investments, consider TIPS.</p><p><blockquote>西格尔鼓励你有符合金融历史的合理预期,这对于畅销书《长期股票》的作者来说并不奇怪。你的投资期限越长,你的完美投资组合中股票的比例就应该越大。考虑发展中国家的股票。对于固定收益投资,请考虑提示。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, as you build your Perfect Portfolio, reflect on your degree of risk aversion, your earning power, the magnitude of your current and future desired wealth, and the magnitude of your current and future financial needs. To assist you, we have created a four-question survey to help you discover where you fit in among 16 types of investors. It then points you toward your Perfect Portfolio and an action that may help you achieve it.</p><p><blockquote>最后,当你建立你的完美投资组合时,反思你的风险厌恶程度、你的赚钱能力、你当前和未来期望财富的大小,以及你当前和未来财务需求的大小。为了帮助您,我们创建了一个四个问题的调查,以帮助您发现自己在 16 种类型的投资者中的位置。然后,它会给你指明你的完美投资组合和一个可能帮助你实现它的行动。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How 10 of the world’s smartest investors can help you build your perfect portfolio<blockquote>全球 10 位最聪明的投资者如何帮助您建立完美的投资组合</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow 10 of the world’s smartest investors can help you build your perfect portfolio<blockquote>全球 10 位最聪明的投资者如何帮助您建立完美的投资组合</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-06 21:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> <b>Listen to Jeremy Siegel, Charles Ellis, Jack Bogle, Robert Shiller and others.</b> Is there a Perfect Portfolio for investors?</p><p><blockquote><b>听听杰里米·西格尔、查尔斯·埃利斯、杰克·博格尔、罗伯特·席勒等人的声音。</b>投资者有没有完美的投资组合?</blockquote></p><p> We posed this question to 10 of the most respected pioneers in the investment community. Six have Nobel Prizes in Economics: Harry Markowitz, the founder of Modern Portfolio Theory, the basis of the modern investment portfolio; his protégé William Sharpe, creator of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the beta risk measure that changed how we think about risk and reward in the financial markets; Eugene Fama, who developed the Efficient Market Hypothesis; Myron Scholes and Robert Merton, two of the co-creators of the Black-Scholes/Merton option pricing model; and Robert Shiller, the behavioral economist whose work challenged the notion of market efficiency.</p><p><blockquote>我们向投资界最受尊敬的10位先驱提出了这个问题。6人获得诺贝尔经济学奖:现代投资组合理论的创始人哈里·马科维茨,现代投资组合的基础;他的门徒威廉·夏普 (William Sharpe),资本资产定价模型 (CAPM) 和贝塔风险度量的创始人,改变了我们对金融市场风险和回报的看法;尤金·法马,他提出了有效市场假说;布莱克-斯科尔斯/默顿期权定价模型的两位共同创始人迈伦·斯科尔斯和罗伯特·默顿;还有行为经济学家罗伯特·席勒,他的工作挑战了市场效率的概念。</blockquote></p><p> The other four are portfolio managers, investors and bestselling authors who have sold millions of investment books, including The Vanguard Group’s founder Jack Bogle; the “Bond Guru,” Marty Leibowitz; the “Wisest Man on Wall Street” and Greenwich Associates founder Charles Ellis; and the “Wizard of Wharton,” Jeremy Siegel.</p><p><blockquote>另外四位是投资组合经理、投资者和畅销书作家,他们已售出数百万本投资书籍,其中包括先锋集团创始人杰克-博格尔(Jack Bogle);“邦德大师”马蒂-莱博维茨;“华尔街最聪明的人”、格林威治联合公司创始人查尔斯-埃利斯;还有 “沃顿商学院巫师 ”杰里米-西格尔。</blockquote></p><p> It’s no surprise that there isn’t consensus among their suggestions, given their varied backgrounds and interests. The different viewpoints of these financial luminaries illustrate the complexity of portfolio management—one size clearly doesn’t fit all.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于他们的背景和兴趣各不相同,他们的建议没有达成共识也就不足为奇了。这些金融名人的不同观点说明了投资组合管理的复杂性--一个尺寸显然不适合所有人。</blockquote></p><p> Think of the Perfect Portfolios of our experts as building blocks for your own Perfect Portfolio, collectively capable of accommodating the goals and constraints of all investors, if used in the right combination.</p><p><blockquote>将我们专家的完美投资组合视为您自己的完美投资组合的基石,如果结合使用得当,这些投资组合能够满足所有投资者的目标和限制。</blockquote></p><p> Markowitz suggests that first and foremost, you should diversify. Focus only on portfolios of securities, and in particular, those that have the highest level of expected returns for a given level of risk, Markowitz’s famous efficient frontier. The same concept applies across asset classes like bonds, real estate and commodities. The key for the investor is to find securities and asset classes with low correlations to each other, so that movements in one are not necessarily reflected in the others.</p><p><blockquote>马科维茨建议,首先也是最重要的,你应该多元化。只关注证券投资组合,尤其是那些在给定风险水平下具有最高预期回报水平的证券投资组合,即马科维茨著名的有效前沿。同样的概念也适用于债券、房地产和大宗商品等资产类别。对投资者来说,关键是找到彼此相关性较低的证券和资产类别,这样其中一个类别的变动就不一定反映在其他类别中。</blockquote></p><p> Sharpe’s Perfect Portfolio is just what his famous Capital Asset Pricing Model suggests: investing in the market as a whole. Sharpe recommends a U.S. total stock market fund, a non-U.S. total stock market fund, a U.S. total bond market fund, and a non-U.S. total bond market fund.</p><p><blockquote>夏普的完美投资组合正是他著名的资本资产定价模型所暗示的:投资于整个市场。夏普推荐美国总股票市场基金、非美国总股票市场基金、美国总债券市场基金和非美国总债券市场基金。</blockquote></p><p> Fama and his collaborator Ken French created a model that starts with Sharpe’s CAPM and augments it with two other factors. One captures the difference in returns between value and growth stocks, while the other captures the difference between stocks in companies with small and large market capitalizations. Fama suggests tilting your diversified portfolio toward value stocks and small-cap stocks, both of which tend to do well over time.</p><p><blockquote>Fama 和他的合作者 Ken French 创建了一个模型,该模型从夏普的 CAPM 开始,然后添加了另外两个因素。一个捕捉了价值股和成长型股票之间的回报差异,而另一个捕捉了小市值和大市值公司股票之间的差异。Fama 建议您将多元化投资组合倾向于价值股和小盘股,这两种股票随着时间的推移往往会表现良好。</blockquote></p><p> As the creator of the first index mutual fund, Bogle’s portfolio was all about stock and bond index funds, such as Vanguard’s ETF that tracks the S&P 500 index SPX, +0.60%. His mantra was to lower your costs through index funds and not take actions that might destroy value: “Don’t do something, just stand there!”</p><p><blockquote>作为第一只指数共同基金的创始人,博格尔的投资组合全部是股票和债券指数基金,例如先锋集团追踪标普500指数 SPX 的 ETF,涨幅为 0.60%。他的口头禅是通过指数基金降低成本,不要采取可能破坏价值的行动: “什么都不做,就站在那里!”</blockquote></p><p> For Scholes, the Perfect Portfolio is about risk management. Your investment success will depend most on avoiding the downside “tail risks,” rare but severe stock market downturns such as the financial crisis of 2007–2009 or the COVID-19 pandemic, while capitalizing on the positive “tail gains.”</p><p><blockquote>对于斯科尔斯来说,完美的投资组合就是风险管理。您的投资成功在很大程度上取决于避免下行的 “尾部风险”,即罕见但严重的股市低迷,如 2007-2009 年的金融危机或 COVID-19 大流行病,同时利用积极的 “尾部收益 ”。</blockquote></p><p> Pay attention to what the derivatives markets such as the VIX volatility index VIX, -1.39% are telling you. For example, when the VIX is at a level below its historical average, you may feel more comfortable investing a greater proportion of your assets in risky stocks.</p><p><blockquote>注意衍生品市场,如VIX波动率指数VIX,-1.39%告诉你什么。例如,当 VIX 处于低于历史平均水平的水平时,您可能会更愿意将更大比例的资产投资于风险股票。</blockquote></p><p> For Merton, ultimately, the Perfect Portfolio should be your very own risk-free asset, like the inflation-protected government bond TIPS. For your retirement goal, ideally you would take your savings at retirement, and buy an annuity that would provide a lifetime income to meet your anticipated needs.</p><p><blockquote>对于默顿来说,最终,完美的投资组合应该是你自己的无风险资产,就像通胀保值政府债券提示一样。对于你的退休目标,理想情况下,你会在退休时拿出你的储蓄,购买一份年金,提供一生的收入来满足你的预期需求。</blockquote></p><p> Leibowitz’s Perfect Portfolio is about the amount of risk you can personally bear. Be prepared to try to make some tough judgment calls, and consider all of your circumstances, including potential life events, current taxes and estate taxes. In addition to equities, you should include bonds to reduce its overall volatility. Have a contingency plan to deal with serious adverse events.</p><p><blockquote>莱博维茨的完美投资组合是关于你个人能够承受的风险大小。准备好尝试做出一些艰难的判断评级,并考虑您的所有情况,包括潜在的生活事件、当前税收和遗产税。除了股票,你还应该包括债券,以降低其整体波动性。有应对严重不良事件的应急预案。</blockquote></p><p> For Shiller, your Perfect Portfolio should be widely diversified, not only across major asset classes, but internationally as well. Place a heavier than typical weight in stocks around the world, where Shiller’s CAPE ratios—that is, cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratios—are relatively low.</p><p><blockquote>对于席勒来说,你的完美投资组合应该广泛多元化,不仅是主要资产类别,而且是国际上的。对世界各地的股票给予比通常更重的权重,因为这些地区的席勒开普比率--即周期性调整后的市盈率--相对较低。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> For Ellis, one of the original advocates of passive investing, your Perfect Portfolio should of course include index funds, especially if you want to have a good chance of being in the top 20% of funds over the next 20 years. You should invest in bond index funds and low-cost international index funds, such as the MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) index. Pay attention to your taxes.</p><p><blockquote>对于被动投资的最初倡导者之一埃利斯来说,你的完美投资组合当然应该包括指数基金,特别是如果你想在未来20年内有很好的机会进入前20%的基金。您应该投资债券指数基金和低成本国际指数基金,例如 MSCI EAFE(欧洲、澳大拉西亚和远东)指数。注意你的税收。</blockquote></p><p> And Siegel encourages you to have reasonable expectations in line with financial history, no surprise for the author of the bestselling “Stocks for the Long Run”. The longer your investment horizon, the greater proportion of your Perfect Portfolio should be in stocks. Consider developing-country stocks. For fixed-income investments, consider TIPS.</p><p><blockquote>西格尔鼓励你有符合金融历史的合理预期,这对于畅销书《长期股票》的作者来说并不奇怪。你的投资期限越长,你的完美投资组合中股票的比例就应该越大。考虑发展中国家的股票。对于固定收益投资,请考虑提示。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, as you build your Perfect Portfolio, reflect on your degree of risk aversion, your earning power, the magnitude of your current and future desired wealth, and the magnitude of your current and future financial needs. To assist you, we have created a four-question survey to help you discover where you fit in among 16 types of investors. It then points you toward your Perfect Portfolio and an action that may help you achieve it.</p><p><blockquote>最后,当你建立你的完美投资组合时,反思你的风险厌恶程度、你的赚钱能力、你当前和未来期望财富的大小,以及你当前和未来财务需求的大小。为了帮助您,我们创建了一个四个问题的调查,以帮助您发现自己在 16 种类型的投资者中的位置。然后,它会给你指明你的完美投资组合和一个可能帮助你实现它的行动。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-10-of-the-worlds-smartest-investors-can-help-you-build-your-perfect-portfolio-11628177690?siteid=yhoof2\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-10-of-the-worlds-smartest-investors-can-help-you-build-your-perfect-portfolio-11628177690?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183941926","content_text":"Listen to Jeremy Siegel, Charles Ellis, Jack Bogle, Robert Shiller and others.\n\nIs there a Perfect Portfolio for investors?\nWe posed this question to 10 of the most respected pioneers in the investment community. Six have Nobel Prizes in Economics: Harry Markowitz, the founder of Modern Portfolio Theory, the basis of the modern investment portfolio; his protégé William Sharpe, creator of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the beta risk measure that changed how we think about risk and reward in the financial markets; Eugene Fama, who developed the Efficient Market Hypothesis; Myron Scholes and Robert Merton, two of the co-creators of the Black-Scholes/Merton option pricing model; and Robert Shiller, the behavioral economist whose work challenged the notion of market efficiency.\nThe other four are portfolio managers, investors and bestselling authors who have sold millions of investment books, including The Vanguard Group’s founder Jack Bogle; the “Bond Guru,” Marty Leibowitz; the “Wisest Man on Wall Street” and Greenwich Associates founder Charles Ellis; and the “Wizard of Wharton,” Jeremy Siegel.\nIt’s no surprise that there isn’t consensus among their suggestions, given their varied backgrounds and interests. The different viewpoints of these financial luminaries illustrate the complexity of portfolio management—one size clearly doesn’t fit all.\nThink of the Perfect Portfolios of our experts as building blocks for your own Perfect Portfolio, collectively capable of accommodating the goals and constraints of all investors, if used in the right combination.\nMarkowitz suggests that first and foremost, you should diversify. Focus only on portfolios of securities, and in particular, those that have the highest level of expected returns for a given level of risk, Markowitz’s famous efficient frontier. The same concept applies across asset classes like bonds, real estate and commodities. The key for the investor is to find securities and asset classes with low correlations to each other, so that movements in one are not necessarily reflected in the others.\nSharpe’s Perfect Portfolio is just what his famous Capital Asset Pricing Model suggests: investing in the market as a whole. Sharpe recommends a U.S. total stock market fund, a non-U.S. total stock market fund, a U.S. total bond market fund, and a non-U.S. total bond market fund.\nFama and his collaborator Ken French created a model that starts with Sharpe’s CAPM and augments it with two other factors. One captures the difference in returns between value and growth stocks, while the other captures the difference between stocks in companies with small and large market capitalizations. Fama suggests tilting your diversified portfolio toward value stocks and small-cap stocks, both of which tend to do well over time.\nAs the creator of the first index mutual fund, Bogle’s portfolio was all about stock and bond index funds, such as Vanguard’s ETF that tracks the S&P 500 index SPX, +0.60%. His mantra was to lower your costs through index funds and not take actions that might destroy value: “Don’t do something, just stand there!”\nFor Scholes, the Perfect Portfolio is about risk management. Your investment success will depend most on avoiding the downside “tail risks,” rare but severe stock market downturns such as the financial crisis of 2007–2009 or the COVID-19 pandemic, while capitalizing on the positive “tail gains.”\nPay attention to what the derivatives markets such as the VIX volatility index VIX, -1.39% are telling you. For example, when the VIX is at a level below its historical average, you may feel more comfortable investing a greater proportion of your assets in risky stocks.\nFor Merton, ultimately, the Perfect Portfolio should be your very own risk-free asset, like the inflation-protected government bond TIPS. For your retirement goal, ideally you would take your savings at retirement, and buy an annuity that would provide a lifetime income to meet your anticipated needs.\nLeibowitz’s Perfect Portfolio is about the amount of risk you can personally bear. Be prepared to try to make some tough judgment calls, and consider all of your circumstances, including potential life events, current taxes and estate taxes. In addition to equities, you should include bonds to reduce its overall volatility. Have a contingency plan to deal with serious adverse events.\nFor Shiller, your Perfect Portfolio should be widely diversified, not only across major asset classes, but internationally as well. Place a heavier than typical weight in stocks around the world, where Shiller’s CAPE ratios—that is, cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratios—are relatively low.\nFor Ellis, one of the original advocates of passive investing, your Perfect Portfolio should of course include index funds, especially if you want to have a good chance of being in the top 20% of funds over the next 20 years. You should invest in bond index funds and low-cost international index funds, such as the MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) index. Pay attention to your taxes.\nAnd Siegel encourages you to have reasonable expectations in line with financial history, no surprise for the author of the bestselling “Stocks for the Long Run”. The longer your investment horizon, the greater proportion of your Perfect Portfolio should be in stocks. Consider developing-country stocks. For fixed-income investments, consider TIPS.\nFinally, as you build your Perfect Portfolio, reflect on your degree of risk aversion, your earning power, the magnitude of your current and future desired wealth, and the magnitude of your current and future financial needs. To assist you, we have created a four-question survey to help you discover where you fit in among 16 types of investors. It then points you toward your Perfect Portfolio and an action that may help you achieve it.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":545,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":813446368,"gmtCreate":1630238199054,"gmtModify":1704957350903,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813446368","repostId":"2162521078","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":837912105,"gmtCreate":1629852230307,"gmtModify":1633681982828,"author":{"id":"4088044554432220","authorId":"4088044554432220","name":"Zin222","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088044554432220","authorIdStr":"4088044554432220"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/837912105","repostId":"2162087230","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":812,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}