Ramesh78的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Ramesh78

Ramesh78

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

180关注

7粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-11-21

$Apple(AAPL)$good

2021-11-21

$Apple(AAPL)$good

2021-11-21

Good 👍

2021-10-15

Good

S.Korea targets Apple over new app store regulation

2021-10-12

Good

Wall St ends choppy session lower on earnings jitters; financials down

2021-10-08

Good

Is Tesla's Stock Forecast Impacted By Rivian R1T Electric Truck?

2021-10-08

Good

September Payrolls Preview: It Will Be A Beat, The Question Is How Big

2021-10-07

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-07

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-07

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-07

Good

Why Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Shiba Inu Are All Skyrocketing Wednesday

2021-09-13

Ok

SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market

2021-09-13

Good

Retail sales, Consumer Price Index: What to know this week

2021-09-07

Ok

Hyundai to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions of all commercial vehicles by 2028

2021-09-07

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-09-07

Good

Microsoft, 11 Other Dividend Growth Stocks To Announce Annual Increases In October

2021-09-02

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-09-01

Better

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-09-01

Ok

Virgin Galactic Jumps as Jefferies Rates it Buy on Growing Demand

2021-09-01

Good

Top India Carmaker Says Output to Drop 40% on Chip Crisis

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4092954016720550","uuid":"4092954016720550","gmtCreate":1629851263597,"gmtModify":1706620620871,"name":"Ramesh78","pinyin":"ramesh78","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":7,"headSize":180,"tweetSize":24,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"93.33%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":872845728,"gmtCreate":1637487987945,"gmtModify":1637487988055,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$good","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8896774c53c06a301e585c7a87269fb2","width":"1080","height":"3650"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872845728","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":958,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":872845562,"gmtCreate":1637487959097,"gmtModify":1637487959207,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872845562","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1128,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":872842470,"gmtCreate":1637487714858,"gmtModify":1637487715003,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good 👍","listText":"Good 👍","text":"Good 👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872842470","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1244,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":824382806,"gmtCreate":1634279720129,"gmtModify":1634279720231,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/824382806","repostId":"2175191891","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2175191891","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1634279654,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2175191891?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-15 14:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S.Korea targets Apple over new app store regulation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2175191891","media":"Reuters","summary":"SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new re","content":"<p>SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new requirements that it stop forcing app developers to use its payment systems, with a government official warning of a possible investigation into the iPhone maker's compliance.</p>\n<p>The development comes after South Korea amended the Telecommunication Business Act in August to try to curb the tech majors' market dominance and stop the big app store operators such as Apple and Alphabet Inc's Google from charging commissions on in-app purchases.</p>\n<p>The law went into effect last month but Apple had told the South Korean government that it was already complying and did not need to change its app store policy, a Korea Communications Commission (KCC) official in charge of the matter told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"This goes against the purpose of the amended law,\" the official said, requesting anonymity as the KCC was still in talks with Apple on compliance.</p>\n<p>The regulator would ask Apple's South Korean unit for a new company policy giving greater autonomy in payment methods, and if Apple failed to comply, would consider measures such as a fact-finding probe as a precursor to possible fines or other penalties.</p>\n<p>Apple did not immediately reply to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>Google had informed the KCC that it planned to comply with the law, including allowing third-party payment systems, and would discuss the matter with the regulator starting next week, the KCC official said.</p>\n<p>Google did not immediately reply to a Reuters' request for comment.</p>\n<p>Jung Jong-chae, a lawyer specialising in antitrust matters, said Apple had more to lose than Google from the Korean regulation.</p>\n<p>\"Differences between Apple and Google in willingness to give ground may be because Apple controls everything from hardware to operating system (OS) to app market to payment system,\" he told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"And (Apple) has more to lose if its dominance breaks on any front, which could lead to calls for openness on other fronts.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S.Korea targets Apple over new app store regulation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS.Korea targets Apple over new app store regulation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-15 14:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new requirements that it stop forcing app developers to use its payment systems, with a government official warning of a possible investigation into the iPhone maker's compliance.</p>\n<p>The development comes after South Korea amended the Telecommunication Business Act in August to try to curb the tech majors' market dominance and stop the big app store operators such as Apple and Alphabet Inc's Google from charging commissions on in-app purchases.</p>\n<p>The law went into effect last month but Apple had told the South Korean government that it was already complying and did not need to change its app store policy, a Korea Communications Commission (KCC) official in charge of the matter told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"This goes against the purpose of the amended law,\" the official said, requesting anonymity as the KCC was still in talks with Apple on compliance.</p>\n<p>The regulator would ask Apple's South Korean unit for a new company policy giving greater autonomy in payment methods, and if Apple failed to comply, would consider measures such as a fact-finding probe as a precursor to possible fines or other penalties.</p>\n<p>Apple did not immediately reply to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>Google had informed the KCC that it planned to comply with the law, including allowing third-party payment systems, and would discuss the matter with the regulator starting next week, the KCC official said.</p>\n<p>Google did not immediately reply to a Reuters' request for comment.</p>\n<p>Jung Jong-chae, a lawyer specialising in antitrust matters, said Apple had more to lose than Google from the Korean regulation.</p>\n<p>\"Differences between Apple and Google in willingness to give ground may be because Apple controls everything from hardware to operating system (OS) to app market to payment system,\" he told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"And (Apple) has more to lose if its dominance breaks on any front, which could lead to calls for openness on other fronts.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2175191891","content_text":"SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new requirements that it stop forcing app developers to use its payment systems, with a government official warning of a possible investigation into the iPhone maker's compliance.\nThe development comes after South Korea amended the Telecommunication Business Act in August to try to curb the tech majors' market dominance and stop the big app store operators such as Apple and Alphabet Inc's Google from charging commissions on in-app purchases.\nThe law went into effect last month but Apple had told the South Korean government that it was already complying and did not need to change its app store policy, a Korea Communications Commission (KCC) official in charge of the matter told Reuters.\n\"This goes against the purpose of the amended law,\" the official said, requesting anonymity as the KCC was still in talks with Apple on compliance.\nThe regulator would ask Apple's South Korean unit for a new company policy giving greater autonomy in payment methods, and if Apple failed to comply, would consider measures such as a fact-finding probe as a precursor to possible fines or other penalties.\nApple did not immediately reply to a request for comment.\nGoogle had informed the KCC that it planned to comply with the law, including allowing third-party payment systems, and would discuss the matter with the regulator starting next week, the KCC official said.\nGoogle did not immediately reply to a Reuters' request for comment.\nJung Jong-chae, a lawyer specialising in antitrust matters, said Apple had more to lose than Google from the Korean regulation.\n\"Differences between Apple and Google in willingness to give ground may be because Apple controls everything from hardware to operating system (OS) to app market to payment system,\" he told Reuters.\n\"And (Apple) has more to lose if its dominance breaks on any front, which could lead to calls for openness on other fronts.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9,"GOOGL":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1052,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":826626554,"gmtCreate":1634015664434,"gmtModify":1634015724948,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/826626554","repostId":"2174854361","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2174854361","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1633992660,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2174854361?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-12 06:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St ends choppy session lower on earnings jitters; financials down","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2174854361","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, Oct 11  - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.Supply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase & Co  results on Wednesday.Indexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&P 500 along with Amazon.com. , whic","content":"<p>NEW YORK, Oct 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.</p>\n<p>Supply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co&nbsp; results on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Indexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500 along with Amazon.com</p>\n<p>, which fell 1.3%. The S&amp;P financial index&nbsp;was down 1%, while communication services&nbsp;dropped 1.5%.</p>\n<p>\"The market is a bit cautious going into this earnings season,\" said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment strategist at Inverness Counsel in New York. \"Supply chain issues may have impacted earnings for a number of companies and certain industries more than others.\"</p>\n<p>While another period of strong U.S. profit growth is forecast for Corporate America, earnings are shaping up to be crucial for investors worried about how supply disruptions and inflation pressures will affect bottom lines.</p>\n<p>That could lead to more volatility on Wall Street following a bruising September. Analysts expect a 29.6% year-over-year increase in profit for S&amp;P 500 companies in the third quarter, according to IBES data from Refinitiv as of Friday.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 250.19 points, or 0.72%, to 34,496.06, the S&amp;P 500 lost 30.15 points, or 0.69%, to 4,361.19 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 93.34 points, or 0.64%, to 14,486.20.</p>\n<p>The energy sector&nbsp;also ended lower after hitting its highest since January 2020 earlier in the day. Higher oil prices have fed into concerns about rising costs for businesses and consumers.</p>\n<p>Analysts do expect some positive earnings news. \"If you're a larger company, you're able to mitigate a lot of these issues,\" said Christopher Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities in New York.</p>\n<p>Managements \"have been very cognizant of their budgets and not sacrificing margins.\" Plus, demand remains strong, he said.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> Inc.&nbsp;was down 2.2% and Mastercard Inc&nbsp;also fell 2.2% among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.15 billion shares, compared with the 10.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Trading may have been slower due to the U.S. federal holiday Monday, with U.S. bond markets shut for the day.</p>\n<p>Among individual stocks, Southwest Airlines Co fell 4.2% on a report that it canceled at least 30% of scheduled flights on Sunday.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St ends choppy session lower on earnings jitters; financials down</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St ends choppy session lower on earnings jitters; financials down\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-12 06:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK, Oct 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.</p>\n<p>Supply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co&nbsp; results on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Indexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500 along with Amazon.com</p>\n<p>, which fell 1.3%. The S&amp;P financial index&nbsp;was down 1%, while communication services&nbsp;dropped 1.5%.</p>\n<p>\"The market is a bit cautious going into this earnings season,\" said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment strategist at Inverness Counsel in New York. \"Supply chain issues may have impacted earnings for a number of companies and certain industries more than others.\"</p>\n<p>While another period of strong U.S. profit growth is forecast for Corporate America, earnings are shaping up to be crucial for investors worried about how supply disruptions and inflation pressures will affect bottom lines.</p>\n<p>That could lead to more volatility on Wall Street following a bruising September. Analysts expect a 29.6% year-over-year increase in profit for S&amp;P 500 companies in the third quarter, according to IBES data from Refinitiv as of Friday.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 250.19 points, or 0.72%, to 34,496.06, the S&amp;P 500 lost 30.15 points, or 0.69%, to 4,361.19 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 93.34 points, or 0.64%, to 14,486.20.</p>\n<p>The energy sector&nbsp;also ended lower after hitting its highest since January 2020 earlier in the day. Higher oil prices have fed into concerns about rising costs for businesses and consumers.</p>\n<p>Analysts do expect some positive earnings news. \"If you're a larger company, you're able to mitigate a lot of these issues,\" said Christopher Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities in New York.</p>\n<p>Managements \"have been very cognizant of their budgets and not sacrificing margins.\" Plus, demand remains strong, he said.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> Inc.&nbsp;was down 2.2% and Mastercard Inc&nbsp;also fell 2.2% among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.15 billion shares, compared with the 10.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Trading may have been slower due to the U.S. federal holiday Monday, with U.S. bond markets shut for the day.</p>\n<p>Among individual stocks, Southwest Airlines Co fell 4.2% on a report that it canceled at least 30% of scheduled flights on Sunday.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","V":"Visa","JPM":"摩根大通",".DJI":"道琼斯","LUV":"西南航空","AMZN":"亚马逊",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","MA":"万事达"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2174854361","content_text":"NEW YORK, Oct 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.\nSupply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase & Co  results on Wednesday.\nIndexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&P 500 along with Amazon.com\n, which fell 1.3%. The S&P financial index was down 1%, while communication services dropped 1.5%.\n\"The market is a bit cautious going into this earnings season,\" said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment strategist at Inverness Counsel in New York. \"Supply chain issues may have impacted earnings for a number of companies and certain industries more than others.\"\nWhile another period of strong U.S. profit growth is forecast for Corporate America, earnings are shaping up to be crucial for investors worried about how supply disruptions and inflation pressures will affect bottom lines.\nThat could lead to more volatility on Wall Street following a bruising September. Analysts expect a 29.6% year-over-year increase in profit for S&P 500 companies in the third quarter, according to IBES data from Refinitiv as of Friday.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 250.19 points, or 0.72%, to 34,496.06, the S&P 500 lost 30.15 points, or 0.69%, to 4,361.19 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 93.34 points, or 0.64%, to 14,486.20.\nThe energy sector also ended lower after hitting its highest since January 2020 earlier in the day. Higher oil prices have fed into concerns about rising costs for businesses and consumers.\nAnalysts do expect some positive earnings news. \"If you're a larger company, you're able to mitigate a lot of these issues,\" said Christopher Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities in New York.\nManagements \"have been very cognizant of their budgets and not sacrificing margins.\" Plus, demand remains strong, he said.\nVisa Inc. was down 2.2% and Mastercard Inc also fell 2.2% among the biggest drags on the S&P 500.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.15 billion shares, compared with the 10.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.\nTrading may have been slower due to the U.S. federal holiday Monday, with U.S. bond markets shut for the day.\nAmong individual stocks, Southwest Airlines Co fell 4.2% on a report that it canceled at least 30% of scheduled flights on Sunday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"JPM":0.9,"LUV":0.9,"MA":0.9,"V":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":821918432,"gmtCreate":1633684979114,"gmtModify":1633684979290,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821918432","repostId":"1154698505","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154698505","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633678648,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154698505?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-08 15:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Tesla's Stock Forecast Impacted By Rivian R1T Electric Truck?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154698505","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nTesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants suc","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Tesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants such as the Cybertruck - which recently got delayed.</li>\n <li>Peers are entering the highly attractive electric truck space way before Tesla, including Rivian with its R1T and Ford with the F-150 Lightning.</li>\n <li>This could hurt Tesla's brand image as well as its stock price, as Tesla has lost the first-mover advantage in this important future market.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccf7c15134ff043f2c3df0d488a4f631\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1022\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>David Becker/Getty Images News</span></p>\n<p><b>Article Thesis</b></p>\n<p>Tesla, Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA)is priced for massive growth over the coming years. The company's industry position is strong today, but competition is a concern. Rivian Automotive's (RIVN) R1T truck will gain a sizeable presence in the electric truck space, which could hurt the outlook for Tesla's Cybertruck that is still about two years away from mass production. Generally, this space should be large enough to accommodate several players a couple of years from now, but the fact that Tesla has lost its first-mover advantage is naturally not a positive. Overall, Tesla's shares seem pretty expensive for where the company stands today, but depending on market sentiment, shares may still run higher.</p>\n<p><b>Is Rivian Publicly Traded?</b></p>\n<p>Rivian Automotive is, so far, not publicly traded. The company plans to go public in the near term, however, as Rivian has filed theS-1for its initial public offering a couple of days ago. The company seeks to sell 10% of its shares for around $8 billion, which would value the company at $80 billion. For a company that has just recently started mass-producing its first model, that seems quite expensive, but then again, Rivian is backed by companies such as Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN)and Ford(NYSE:F)and has a compelling product and the first-mover advantage in the electric truck market.</p>\n<p><b>How Is Rivian Different From Tesla?</b></p>\n<p>The two companies are active in the same industry, but there are vast differences between them. The most obvious one is the size and scale of the company -- Tesla is currently producing around 900,000 vehicles a year, while Rivian has just begun producing its first model. Tesla operates several factories across different continents and owns a network of stores and superchargers, while the same is not true for Rivian. Last but not least, Tesla is ambitious to become a major player in energy storage, solar, etc. These ventures are not profitable yet, which limits the current value of these business units, but Tesla is clearly more diversified across the whole \"new energy\" industry compared to Rivian, which is an EV manufacturer solely.</p>\n<p>Tesla's way larger size and established operations also lead to another important difference -- Tesla is, unlike Rivian, profitable and able to self-fund its operations and capital expenditures, which makes it less dependent on capital markets. Rivian will, for the foreseeable future, rely on capital markets to fund its future growth.</p>\n<p><b>Will Tesla Be Impacted By Rivian's R1T Truck?</b></p>\n<p>Tesla has, in the past, grown its production volumes and revenues reliably through two growth drivers: The introduction of new models, and through increasing sales volumes for its existing models. Over the last couple of quarters, almost all of Tesla's sales stemmed from Model 3 and Model Y sales, as X and S sales took a backseat. Future growth will likely be driven by increasing sales of Tesla's 3 and Y models, but the company is also dependent on the introduction of new models to some degree. The Roadster 2 will not be a volume model, but a lot of hope rests on Tesla's Cybertruck. The Cybertruck, which was presented in 2019, will go into production towards the end of 2022, according to CEO&nbsp;Elon Musk. Mass production, however, is still further away, and targeted for the end of 2023, or about two years from now.</p>\n<p>When we consider the fact that Tesla has oftentimes missed its own timelines, be it robo-taxis, the Roadster 2, or others, it seems possible that the Cybertruck will be delayed further, and may not be mass-produced before 2024. This would be the case if Tesla misses current estimates by a couple of months, which wouldn't be an overly large surprise. By that time, Rivian will have produced its R1T truck for a couple of years, and others will have entered the attractive electric truck market as well. Ford, for example, is on track to bring its F-150 Lighting to the market soon, as&nbsp;pre-production&nbsp;started in September, and market entry is just a matter of months.</p>\n<p>The competition from Rivian's R1T and Ford's F-150 could impact Tesla in several ways. First, the fact that the Cybertruck will be late to the market relative to competitors' products will mean that those customers that are very eager to buy an electric truck will go with Rivian or Ford, and not Tesla. Those very eager customers do likely include many that are willing to pay above-average prices, which will allow Ford and Rivian to absorb buying power that is then not available for Tesla when it brings out its Cybertruck two years later.</p>\n<p>On top of that, the fact that the R1T and the F-150 Lighting will be on the roads well before the Cybertruck is available could hurt Tesla's image as a key electric truck manufacturer. Tesla has the brand advantage in EVs, generally, thanks to its first-mover advantage. But with it being late in the truck space, this first-mover advantage and the increased brand recognition could fall to Rivian and Ford instead of Tesla. As long as Rivian's and Ford's products satisfy customers (which is not guaranteed), truck buyers might build brand loyalty with Rivian and Ford, which could hurt Tesla's ability to sell its Cybertruck and future electric trucks in the long run. Once the opportunity to be a first-mover is missed, others have the advantage, similar to how Tesla has an advantage in selling electric cars today.</p>\n<p>Last but not least, successful launches by Rivian and Ford could also impact Tesla's stock valuation. In case both Rivian and Ford are able to scale up production well and sell large amounts of electric trucks before the Cybertruck is released, investors interested in EV stocks may start to divert away from Tesla. If Rivian is successful in rolling out an electric truck well before Tesla, some current Tesla shareholders may decide to go with Rivian instead, or to split investments between the two companies. This could, in turn, lead to lower demand for Tesla's shares and to some selling pressure, which would be a negative for TSLA stock.</p>\n<p>None of these is guaranteed, and it is, of course, possible that Tesla beats its own timeline and that the Cybertruck will be made available sooner than expected. It is also possible that manufacturing problems for the R1T or the F-150 Lightning emerge, which would mean that Tesla has more time to catch up. But for now it looks like Rivian and Ford are in the leadership position in the electric truck space, and Tesla being behind its competitors naturally is a negative for the company and its stock. This could hurt demand for the Cybertruck, hurt Tesla's brand image as a technological leader and first-mover, and it could make its shares less compelling relative to those of other EV manufacturers.</p>\n<p><b>Is Tesla Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?</b></p>\n<p>The electric truck space will be large enough to allow several players to do well a couple of years from now, thus Tesla being behind with its Cybertruck does not mean that the model will not sell well. But it is still important to know whether a company will hold a 30% market share or a 20% market share, for example, five years from now. With Tesla being behind competitors, I do believe that it is not very likely that Tesla will dominate the US electric truck space the same way it dominates the US electric car space today.</p>\n<p>Tesla will still see its volumes and revenue grow over the coming years, but growth may not be meaningful enough to justify the current valuation. Tesla is forecasted to generate revenue of $51 billion this year, $67 billion in 2022, and $83 billion in 2023:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c2d74e02403e2b6edbc187bf103c6bb\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>This equates to a growth rate of 31% next year and 24% in 2023. Note that expected revenue growth is less than the 50% average volume growth expected by Tesla, due to the fact that current analyst models predict that Tesla may not be able to deliver on that goal, while average sales price compression could also be a headwind for revenue growth. Overall, revenue growth in the 20%-30% range is still attractive, of course, compared to legacy auto players that do not manage to grow this meaningfully.</p>\n<p>With 1.12 billion diluted shares, Tesla is currently valued at $875 billion, which equates to a forward sales multiple of 17. Likewise, the sales multiples for 2022 and 2023 stand at 13 and 11, respectively. These are not only very high valuations relative to legacy auto makers, but even relative to some of the other EV players. NIO(NYSE:NIO)and XPeng(NYSE:XPEV), for example, which are growing faster than Tesla, are both valued at 6x 2022's expected revenue today, which makes for a little less than half of Tesla's valuation. Lucid(NASDAQ:LCID), which is a pretty new market entrant, and which should grow faster than Tesla on a relative basis over the coming years, is valued at&nbsp;10x&nbsp;2023's expected revenue, versus Tesla's 11x 2023's expected revenue. Overall, I do thus believe that Tesla's shares are too expensive at current prices. This does not at all mean that Tesla is a bad company or that the company will not generate any business growth, but valuations should always be considered. The fact that Tesla is way behind competitors in the electric truck segment is another reason, for me, to believe that Tesla's current valuation is too high -- shares are priced for perfection, and Tesla is far from being perfect, even though the company is solid for sure.</p>\n<p>Tesla's overly high valuation versus legacy players with growing EV businesses, such as Ford or Volkswagen(OTCPK:VWAGY), and Tesla's premium valuation versus higher-growth EV peers makes me believe that shares are an avoid at current prices. Locking in gains could be a good idea for those that are long the stock.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Tesla's Stock Forecast Impacted By Rivian R1T Electric Truck?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Tesla's Stock Forecast Impacted By Rivian R1T Electric Truck?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-08 15:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4458901-tesla-stock-forecast-rivian-r1t-electric-truck><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nTesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants such as the Cybertruck - which recently got delayed.\nPeers are entering the highly attractive electric ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4458901-tesla-stock-forecast-rivian-r1t-electric-truck\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4458901-tesla-stock-forecast-rivian-r1t-electric-truck","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154698505","content_text":"Summary\n\nTesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants such as the Cybertruck - which recently got delayed.\nPeers are entering the highly attractive electric truck space way before Tesla, including Rivian with its R1T and Ford with the F-150 Lightning.\nThis could hurt Tesla's brand image as well as its stock price, as Tesla has lost the first-mover advantage in this important future market.\n\nDavid Becker/Getty Images News\nArticle Thesis\nTesla, Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA)is priced for massive growth over the coming years. The company's industry position is strong today, but competition is a concern. Rivian Automotive's (RIVN) R1T truck will gain a sizeable presence in the electric truck space, which could hurt the outlook for Tesla's Cybertruck that is still about two years away from mass production. Generally, this space should be large enough to accommodate several players a couple of years from now, but the fact that Tesla has lost its first-mover advantage is naturally not a positive. Overall, Tesla's shares seem pretty expensive for where the company stands today, but depending on market sentiment, shares may still run higher.\nIs Rivian Publicly Traded?\nRivian Automotive is, so far, not publicly traded. The company plans to go public in the near term, however, as Rivian has filed theS-1for its initial public offering a couple of days ago. The company seeks to sell 10% of its shares for around $8 billion, which would value the company at $80 billion. For a company that has just recently started mass-producing its first model, that seems quite expensive, but then again, Rivian is backed by companies such as Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN)and Ford(NYSE:F)and has a compelling product and the first-mover advantage in the electric truck market.\nHow Is Rivian Different From Tesla?\nThe two companies are active in the same industry, but there are vast differences between them. The most obvious one is the size and scale of the company -- Tesla is currently producing around 900,000 vehicles a year, while Rivian has just begun producing its first model. Tesla operates several factories across different continents and owns a network of stores and superchargers, while the same is not true for Rivian. Last but not least, Tesla is ambitious to become a major player in energy storage, solar, etc. These ventures are not profitable yet, which limits the current value of these business units, but Tesla is clearly more diversified across the whole \"new energy\" industry compared to Rivian, which is an EV manufacturer solely.\nTesla's way larger size and established operations also lead to another important difference -- Tesla is, unlike Rivian, profitable and able to self-fund its operations and capital expenditures, which makes it less dependent on capital markets. Rivian will, for the foreseeable future, rely on capital markets to fund its future growth.\nWill Tesla Be Impacted By Rivian's R1T Truck?\nTesla has, in the past, grown its production volumes and revenues reliably through two growth drivers: The introduction of new models, and through increasing sales volumes for its existing models. Over the last couple of quarters, almost all of Tesla's sales stemmed from Model 3 and Model Y sales, as X and S sales took a backseat. Future growth will likely be driven by increasing sales of Tesla's 3 and Y models, but the company is also dependent on the introduction of new models to some degree. The Roadster 2 will not be a volume model, but a lot of hope rests on Tesla's Cybertruck. The Cybertruck, which was presented in 2019, will go into production towards the end of 2022, according to CEO Elon Musk. Mass production, however, is still further away, and targeted for the end of 2023, or about two years from now.\nWhen we consider the fact that Tesla has oftentimes missed its own timelines, be it robo-taxis, the Roadster 2, or others, it seems possible that the Cybertruck will be delayed further, and may not be mass-produced before 2024. This would be the case if Tesla misses current estimates by a couple of months, which wouldn't be an overly large surprise. By that time, Rivian will have produced its R1T truck for a couple of years, and others will have entered the attractive electric truck market as well. Ford, for example, is on track to bring its F-150 Lighting to the market soon, as pre-production started in September, and market entry is just a matter of months.\nThe competition from Rivian's R1T and Ford's F-150 could impact Tesla in several ways. First, the fact that the Cybertruck will be late to the market relative to competitors' products will mean that those customers that are very eager to buy an electric truck will go with Rivian or Ford, and not Tesla. Those very eager customers do likely include many that are willing to pay above-average prices, which will allow Ford and Rivian to absorb buying power that is then not available for Tesla when it brings out its Cybertruck two years later.\nOn top of that, the fact that the R1T and the F-150 Lighting will be on the roads well before the Cybertruck is available could hurt Tesla's image as a key electric truck manufacturer. Tesla has the brand advantage in EVs, generally, thanks to its first-mover advantage. But with it being late in the truck space, this first-mover advantage and the increased brand recognition could fall to Rivian and Ford instead of Tesla. As long as Rivian's and Ford's products satisfy customers (which is not guaranteed), truck buyers might build brand loyalty with Rivian and Ford, which could hurt Tesla's ability to sell its Cybertruck and future electric trucks in the long run. Once the opportunity to be a first-mover is missed, others have the advantage, similar to how Tesla has an advantage in selling electric cars today.\nLast but not least, successful launches by Rivian and Ford could also impact Tesla's stock valuation. In case both Rivian and Ford are able to scale up production well and sell large amounts of electric trucks before the Cybertruck is released, investors interested in EV stocks may start to divert away from Tesla. If Rivian is successful in rolling out an electric truck well before Tesla, some current Tesla shareholders may decide to go with Rivian instead, or to split investments between the two companies. This could, in turn, lead to lower demand for Tesla's shares and to some selling pressure, which would be a negative for TSLA stock.\nNone of these is guaranteed, and it is, of course, possible that Tesla beats its own timeline and that the Cybertruck will be made available sooner than expected. It is also possible that manufacturing problems for the R1T or the F-150 Lightning emerge, which would mean that Tesla has more time to catch up. But for now it looks like Rivian and Ford are in the leadership position in the electric truck space, and Tesla being behind its competitors naturally is a negative for the company and its stock. This could hurt demand for the Cybertruck, hurt Tesla's brand image as a technological leader and first-mover, and it could make its shares less compelling relative to those of other EV manufacturers.\nIs Tesla Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?\nThe electric truck space will be large enough to allow several players to do well a couple of years from now, thus Tesla being behind with its Cybertruck does not mean that the model will not sell well. But it is still important to know whether a company will hold a 30% market share or a 20% market share, for example, five years from now. With Tesla being behind competitors, I do believe that it is not very likely that Tesla will dominate the US electric truck space the same way it dominates the US electric car space today.\nTesla will still see its volumes and revenue grow over the coming years, but growth may not be meaningful enough to justify the current valuation. Tesla is forecasted to generate revenue of $51 billion this year, $67 billion in 2022, and $83 billion in 2023:\nData by YCharts\nThis equates to a growth rate of 31% next year and 24% in 2023. Note that expected revenue growth is less than the 50% average volume growth expected by Tesla, due to the fact that current analyst models predict that Tesla may not be able to deliver on that goal, while average sales price compression could also be a headwind for revenue growth. Overall, revenue growth in the 20%-30% range is still attractive, of course, compared to legacy auto players that do not manage to grow this meaningfully.\nWith 1.12 billion diluted shares, Tesla is currently valued at $875 billion, which equates to a forward sales multiple of 17. Likewise, the sales multiples for 2022 and 2023 stand at 13 and 11, respectively. These are not only very high valuations relative to legacy auto makers, but even relative to some of the other EV players. NIO(NYSE:NIO)and XPeng(NYSE:XPEV), for example, which are growing faster than Tesla, are both valued at 6x 2022's expected revenue today, which makes for a little less than half of Tesla's valuation. Lucid(NASDAQ:LCID), which is a pretty new market entrant, and which should grow faster than Tesla on a relative basis over the coming years, is valued at 10x 2023's expected revenue, versus Tesla's 11x 2023's expected revenue. Overall, I do thus believe that Tesla's shares are too expensive at current prices. This does not at all mean that Tesla is a bad company or that the company will not generate any business growth, but valuations should always be considered. The fact that Tesla is way behind competitors in the electric truck segment is another reason, for me, to believe that Tesla's current valuation is too high -- shares are priced for perfection, and Tesla is far from being perfect, even though the company is solid for sure.\nTesla's overly high valuation versus legacy players with growing EV businesses, such as Ford or Volkswagen(OTCPK:VWAGY), and Tesla's premium valuation versus higher-growth EV peers makes me believe that shares are an avoid at current prices. Locking in gains could be a good idea for those that are long the stock.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":682,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":821918161,"gmtCreate":1633684923516,"gmtModify":1633684923640,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821918161","repostId":"1135993400","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1135993400","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633675137,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1135993400?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-08 14:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"September Payrolls Preview: It Will Be A Beat, The Question Is How Big","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1135993400","media":"zerohedge","summary":"After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the mo","content":"<p>After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the most important economic data point of the week, and the month, Friday's nonfarm payrolls report due at 830am ET on Friday, where consensus expects a 500K print- more than double last month's disappointing 235K print - as well as a drop in the unemployment rate to 5.1% and an increase in average hourly earnings to 4.6%. And unlike last month, when wecorrectly predicted the big miss in August payrolls, this time we agree that tomorrow's report will be a beat, the only question is how big.</p>\n<p>Here is a snapshot of what to expect tomorrow:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Total Payrolls: 500K, Last 235K</li>\n <li>Private Payrolls: 450K, Last 243K</li>\n <li>Unemployment Rate: 5.1%, Last 5.2%</li>\n <li>Labor force participation rate: 61.8%, Last 61.7%</li>\n <li>Average Hourly Earnings Y/Y: 4.6%, Last 4.3%</li>\n <li>Average Weekly Hours: 34.7, Last 34.7</li>\n</ul>\n<p>As&nbsp;Newsquawk&nbsp;writes in its NFP preview, September’s jobs data, the last before the Fed’s November 3rd policy meeting, will be framed in the context of the central bank’s expected taper announcement, where a merely satisfactory report would likely to be enough for the FOMC to greenlight a November announcement to scale-back its USD 120BN/month asset purchases.</p>\n<p>Goldman economists are more bullish than normal, and estimate nonfarm payrolls rose 600k in September, above consensus of +500k, and they note that \"labor demand remains very strong,&nbsp;<b>and we believe the nationwide expiration of enhanced unemployment beneﬁts on September 5 boosted effective labor supply and job growth—as it did in July and August in states that ended federal beneﬁts early.\"</b>As a result, Goldman is assuming a 200k boost in tomorrow’s numbers and a larger boost in October. The bank also believes the reopening of schools contributed to September job growth, by around 150k. Despite these tailwinds, Big Data employment signals were mixed, and dining activity rebounded only marginally.</p>\n<p>Labor market proxies have been constructive for the month: ADP’s gauge of payrolls surprised to the upside, although analysts continue to note that the direct relationship between the official data and the ADP’s gauge is tenuous, despite the gap being under 100k over the last three reports. The number of initial jobless claims and continuing claims has eased back between the survey periods of the August and September jobs data, although analysts note that more recent releases have shown an uptick in claims potentially clouding the outlook. The ISM business surveys have signaled employment growth in the month, with manufacturing employment rising into growth territory again, but services sector hiring cooled a little in the month, but remains expansionary; survey commentary continues to allude to a tight labour market. The Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the September employment situation report at 13:30BST/08:30EDT on October 8th.</p>\n<p><b>POLICY</b>: The September jobs report might have reduced relevance on trading conditions given that Fed officials have effectively confirmed that, barring a collapse in the jobs data, it is on course to announce a tapering of its asset purchases at the November 3rd meeting. Accordingly, trading risks may be skewed to the downside, rather than to the upside, where a significant payrolls miss may present obstacles to the Fed announcing its taper. Additionally, it is worth being cognizant of how efforts in Washington to raise the debt ceiling are progressing; as yet, officials have not struck a deal, and are in the process of enacting stop gap legislation to allow funding into December; some analysts suggest that the Fed may be reticent to tighten policy in the face of potential default risks.</p>\n<p><b>PAYROLLS:</b>The consensus looks for 500k nonfarm payrolls to be added to the US economy in September (prev. 235k), which would be a cooler rate of growth than the three- and six-month average rate, though in line with the 12-month average (3-month average is 750k/month, the six-month average is 653k/month, and the 12-month average is 503k/month – that technically at least suggests an improving rate of payrolls growth in recent months).<b>Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.</b></p>\n<p><b>MEASURES OF SLACK:</b>The Unemployment Rate is expected at 5.1% (prev. 5.2%); Labour Force Participation previously at 61.7% vs 63.2% pre-pandemic; U6 measure of underemployment was previously at 8.8% vs 7.0% prepandemic; Employment-population ratio was previously 58.5% vs 61.1% pre-pandemic. These measures of slack are likely to provide more insight into how Fed officials are judging labour market progress, with many in recent months noting that they are closely watching the Underemployment Rate, Participation Rate, and the Employment-Population Ratio for a better handle on the level of slack that remains in the economy. Analysts would be encouraged the closer these get to pre-pandemic levels.</p>\n<p><b>EARNINGS:</b>Average Hourly Earnings expected at +0.4% M/M (prev. +0.6%); Average Hourly Earnings expected at +4. 6% Y/Y (prev. +4.3%); Average Workweek Hours expected at 34.7hrs (prev. 34.7hrs). Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans still remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.</p>\n<p><b>ADP:</b>The ADP National Employment Report showed 568k jobs added to the US economy in September, topping expectations for 428k, and a better pace than the prior 340k (revised down from 374k initially reported). ADP itself said that the labor market recovery continued to make progress despite the marked slowdown in the rate of job additions from the 748k pace seen in Q2. It also noted that Leisure &amp; Hospitality remained one of the biggest beneficiaries to the recovery, though said that hiring was still heavily impacted by the trajectory of the pandemic, especially for small firms. ADP thinks that the current bottlenecks in hiring will likely fade as the pandemic situation continues to improve, and that could set the stage for solid job gains in the months ahead. On the data methodology, analysts continue to note that ADP's model incorporates much of the prior official payrolls data, other macroeconomic variables, as well as data from its own payrolls platform; \"Payrolls were soft in August, thanks to the hit to the services sector from the Delta variant, and that weakness likely constrained ADP data,\" Pantheon Macroeconomics said. \"The overshoot to consensus, therefore, suggests that the other inputs to ADP’s model were stronger than we expected, but none of the details are published, so we don’t know if the overshoot was model-driven or due to stronger employment data at ADP’s clients.\"</p>\n<p><b>INITIAL JOBLESS CLAIMS:</b>Initial jobless claims data for the week that coincides with the BLS jobs report survey window saw claims at around 351k – little changed from the 349k for the August jobs data survey window – where analysts said seasonal factors played a role in boosting the weekly data, while there may have been some lingering Hurricane Ida effects; the corresponding continuing claims data has fallen to 2.802mln in the September survey period vs 2.908mln in the August survey period. In aggregate, the data continues to point to declining trend, although in recent weeks the level of jobless claims has been picking up again.</p>\n<p><b>BUSINESS SURVEYS</b>: The Services and Manufacturing ISM reports showed divergent trends in September, with the service sector employment sub-index easing a little to 53.0 from 53.7, signalling growth but at a slower rate, while the manufacturing employment sub-index rose back into expansionary territory, printing 50.2 from 49.0 prior. On the manufacturing sector, ISM said companies were still struggling to meet labour-management plans, but noted some modest signs of progress compared to previous months: \"Less than 5% of comments noted improvements regarding employment, compared to none in August,\" it said, \"an overwhelming majority of panelists indicate their companies are hiring or attempting to hire,\" where around 85% of responses were about seeking additional staffing, while nearly half of the respondents expressed difficulty in filling positions, an increase from August. \"The increasing frequency of comments on turnover rates and retirements continued a trend that began in August,\" ISM said. Meanwhile, in the services sector, employment activity rose for a third straight month; respondents noted that employees were flocking to better-paying jobs and there was a lack of pipeline to replace these staff, while other respondents talked of labor shortages being experienced at all levels.</p>\n<p><b>ARGUING FOR A BETTER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT</b>:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>End of federal enhanced unemployment beneﬁts</b>. The expiration of federal beneﬁts in some states boosted labor supply and job-ﬁnding rates over the summer, and all remaining such programs expired on September 5. The July and August indicated a cumulative 6pp boost to job-ﬁnding probabilities from June to August for workers losing $300 top-up payments and a 12pp boost for workers losing all beneﬁts.<b>Some of the 6mn workers who lost some or all beneﬁts on September 5 got a job by September 18—in time to be counted in tomorrow’s data.</b>Goldman assumes a +200k boost to job growth from this channel, with a larger increase in subsequent reports (+1.3mn cumulatively by year end).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8e5900cf66c76d4b64055f84e58048\" tg-width=\"630\" tg-height=\"428\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>School reopening</b>. The largest 100 school districts are all open for in-person learning, catalyzing the return of many previously furloughed teachers and support staff. While full normalization of employment levels would contribute 600k jobs (mom sa, see left panel of the chart below), some janitors and support staff did not return due to hybrid teaching models, and job openings in the sector are only 200k above the pre-crisis level (see right panel). Relatedly, the BLS’s seasonal factors already embed the usual rehiring of education workers on summer layoff, so if fewer janitors returned to work than in a typical September, this would reduce seasonally adjusted job growth, other things equal. Taken together, assume a roughly 150k boost from the reopening of schools in tomorrow’s report.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff3e69723b40e0d372ec2bebecb38b1f\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"376\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Job availability</b>. The Conference Board labor differential—the difference between the percent of respondents saying jobs are plentiful and those saying jobs are hardto get - edged down to 42.5 from 44.4, still an elevated level. Additionally, JOLTS job openings increased by 749k in July to a new record high of 10.9mn.</li>\n <li><b>ADP.</b>Private sector employment in the ADP report increased by 568k in September, above consensus expectations for a 430k gain, implying strong growth in the underlying ADP sample. Additionally, schools generally do not use ADP payroll software, arguing for a larger gain from school reopening in the official payroll measure.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>ARGUING FOR A WEAKER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT:</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Delta variant.</b>Rebounding covid infection rates weighed on services consumption and the labor market in August. And while US case counts began to decline in early September, restaurant seatings on Open Table rebounded only marginally. leisure and hospitality employment rose in September, but probably not at the ~400k monthly pace of June and July.</li>\n <li><b>Employer surveys</b>. The employment components of our business surveys were flat to down, whereas we and consensus forecast a pickup in job growth. Goldman's services survey employment tracker remained unchanged at 54.5 and the manufacturing survey employment tracker declined 0.4pt to 57.8. And while the Goldman Sachs Analyst Index (GSAI) decreased 0.8% to 68.5, the employment component rose1.9% to 71.9.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>NEUTRAL FACTORS:</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Big Data.</b>High-frequency data on the labor market were mixed between the August and September survey weeks, on net providing little guidance about the underlying pace of job growth. Three of the five measures tracked indicate an at-or-above-consensus gain (Census Small Business Pulse +0.5mn, ADP +0.6mn,Google mobility +2mn), but the Homebase data was an outlier to the downside. At face value, it would indicate a large outright decline in payrolls. The Census Household Pulse (-0.6mn) was also quite weak, though encouragingly, it also indicated a large drop in childcare-related labor supply headwinds as schools reopened.</li>\n <li><b>Seasonality.</b>The September seasonal hurdle is relatively low: the BLS adjustment factors generally assume a 600-700k decline in private payrolls (which exclude public schools), compared to around -100k on average in July and August. Continued labor shortages encouraged firms to lay off fewer workers at the end of summer. Partially offsetting this tailwind, the September seasonal factors may have evolved unfavorably due to the crisis—specifically by fitting to last September’s reopening-driven job surge (private payrolls +932k mom sa).</li>\n <li><b>Jobless claims.</b>Initial jobless claims fell during the September payroll month, averaging 339k per week vs. 378k in August despite a boost from individuals transitioning or attempting to transition to state programs. Across all employee programs including emergency benefits, continuing claims fell dramatically (-3.3mn)–but again for non-economic reasons (federal enhanced programs expired). Continuing claims in regular state programs decreased 106k from survey week to survey week.</li>\n <li><b>Job cuts.</b>Announced layoffs reported by Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas rebounded 11% month-over-month in September after decreasing by 14% over the prior two months (SA by GS). Nonetheless, layoffs remain near the three-decade low on this measure (in 1993).</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>September Payrolls Preview: It Will Be A Beat, The Question Is How Big</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSeptember Payrolls Preview: It Will Be A Beat, The Question Is How Big\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-08 14:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/september-payrolls-preview-it-will-be-beat-question-how-big><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the most important economic data point of the week, and the month, Friday's nonfarm payrolls report due at...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/september-payrolls-preview-it-will-be-beat-question-how-big\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/september-payrolls-preview-it-will-be-beat-question-how-big","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1135993400","content_text":"After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the most important economic data point of the week, and the month, Friday's nonfarm payrolls report due at 830am ET on Friday, where consensus expects a 500K print- more than double last month's disappointing 235K print - as well as a drop in the unemployment rate to 5.1% and an increase in average hourly earnings to 4.6%. And unlike last month, when wecorrectly predicted the big miss in August payrolls, this time we agree that tomorrow's report will be a beat, the only question is how big.\nHere is a snapshot of what to expect tomorrow:\n\nTotal Payrolls: 500K, Last 235K\nPrivate Payrolls: 450K, Last 243K\nUnemployment Rate: 5.1%, Last 5.2%\nLabor force participation rate: 61.8%, Last 61.7%\nAverage Hourly Earnings Y/Y: 4.6%, Last 4.3%\nAverage Weekly Hours: 34.7, Last 34.7\n\nAs Newsquawk writes in its NFP preview, September’s jobs data, the last before the Fed’s November 3rd policy meeting, will be framed in the context of the central bank’s expected taper announcement, where a merely satisfactory report would likely to be enough for the FOMC to greenlight a November announcement to scale-back its USD 120BN/month asset purchases.\nGoldman economists are more bullish than normal, and estimate nonfarm payrolls rose 600k in September, above consensus of +500k, and they note that \"labor demand remains very strong, and we believe the nationwide expiration of enhanced unemployment beneﬁts on September 5 boosted effective labor supply and job growth—as it did in July and August in states that ended federal beneﬁts early.\"As a result, Goldman is assuming a 200k boost in tomorrow’s numbers and a larger boost in October. The bank also believes the reopening of schools contributed to September job growth, by around 150k. Despite these tailwinds, Big Data employment signals were mixed, and dining activity rebounded only marginally.\nLabor market proxies have been constructive for the month: ADP’s gauge of payrolls surprised to the upside, although analysts continue to note that the direct relationship between the official data and the ADP’s gauge is tenuous, despite the gap being under 100k over the last three reports. The number of initial jobless claims and continuing claims has eased back between the survey periods of the August and September jobs data, although analysts note that more recent releases have shown an uptick in claims potentially clouding the outlook. The ISM business surveys have signaled employment growth in the month, with manufacturing employment rising into growth territory again, but services sector hiring cooled a little in the month, but remains expansionary; survey commentary continues to allude to a tight labour market. The Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the September employment situation report at 13:30BST/08:30EDT on October 8th.\nPOLICY: The September jobs report might have reduced relevance on trading conditions given that Fed officials have effectively confirmed that, barring a collapse in the jobs data, it is on course to announce a tapering of its asset purchases at the November 3rd meeting. Accordingly, trading risks may be skewed to the downside, rather than to the upside, where a significant payrolls miss may present obstacles to the Fed announcing its taper. Additionally, it is worth being cognizant of how efforts in Washington to raise the debt ceiling are progressing; as yet, officials have not struck a deal, and are in the process of enacting stop gap legislation to allow funding into December; some analysts suggest that the Fed may be reticent to tighten policy in the face of potential default risks.\nPAYROLLS:The consensus looks for 500k nonfarm payrolls to be added to the US economy in September (prev. 235k), which would be a cooler rate of growth than the three- and six-month average rate, though in line with the 12-month average (3-month average is 750k/month, the six-month average is 653k/month, and the 12-month average is 503k/month – that technically at least suggests an improving rate of payrolls growth in recent months).Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.\nMEASURES OF SLACK:The Unemployment Rate is expected at 5.1% (prev. 5.2%); Labour Force Participation previously at 61.7% vs 63.2% pre-pandemic; U6 measure of underemployment was previously at 8.8% vs 7.0% prepandemic; Employment-population ratio was previously 58.5% vs 61.1% pre-pandemic. These measures of slack are likely to provide more insight into how Fed officials are judging labour market progress, with many in recent months noting that they are closely watching the Underemployment Rate, Participation Rate, and the Employment-Population Ratio for a better handle on the level of slack that remains in the economy. Analysts would be encouraged the closer these get to pre-pandemic levels.\nEARNINGS:Average Hourly Earnings expected at +0.4% M/M (prev. +0.6%); Average Hourly Earnings expected at +4. 6% Y/Y (prev. +4.3%); Average Workweek Hours expected at 34.7hrs (prev. 34.7hrs). Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans still remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.\nADP:The ADP National Employment Report showed 568k jobs added to the US economy in September, topping expectations for 428k, and a better pace than the prior 340k (revised down from 374k initially reported). ADP itself said that the labor market recovery continued to make progress despite the marked slowdown in the rate of job additions from the 748k pace seen in Q2. It also noted that Leisure & Hospitality remained one of the biggest beneficiaries to the recovery, though said that hiring was still heavily impacted by the trajectory of the pandemic, especially for small firms. ADP thinks that the current bottlenecks in hiring will likely fade as the pandemic situation continues to improve, and that could set the stage for solid job gains in the months ahead. On the data methodology, analysts continue to note that ADP's model incorporates much of the prior official payrolls data, other macroeconomic variables, as well as data from its own payrolls platform; \"Payrolls were soft in August, thanks to the hit to the services sector from the Delta variant, and that weakness likely constrained ADP data,\" Pantheon Macroeconomics said. \"The overshoot to consensus, therefore, suggests that the other inputs to ADP’s model were stronger than we expected, but none of the details are published, so we don’t know if the overshoot was model-driven or due to stronger employment data at ADP’s clients.\"\nINITIAL JOBLESS CLAIMS:Initial jobless claims data for the week that coincides with the BLS jobs report survey window saw claims at around 351k – little changed from the 349k for the August jobs data survey window – where analysts said seasonal factors played a role in boosting the weekly data, while there may have been some lingering Hurricane Ida effects; the corresponding continuing claims data has fallen to 2.802mln in the September survey period vs 2.908mln in the August survey period. In aggregate, the data continues to point to declining trend, although in recent weeks the level of jobless claims has been picking up again.\nBUSINESS SURVEYS: The Services and Manufacturing ISM reports showed divergent trends in September, with the service sector employment sub-index easing a little to 53.0 from 53.7, signalling growth but at a slower rate, while the manufacturing employment sub-index rose back into expansionary territory, printing 50.2 from 49.0 prior. On the manufacturing sector, ISM said companies were still struggling to meet labour-management plans, but noted some modest signs of progress compared to previous months: \"Less than 5% of comments noted improvements regarding employment, compared to none in August,\" it said, \"an overwhelming majority of panelists indicate their companies are hiring or attempting to hire,\" where around 85% of responses were about seeking additional staffing, while nearly half of the respondents expressed difficulty in filling positions, an increase from August. \"The increasing frequency of comments on turnover rates and retirements continued a trend that began in August,\" ISM said. Meanwhile, in the services sector, employment activity rose for a third straight month; respondents noted that employees were flocking to better-paying jobs and there was a lack of pipeline to replace these staff, while other respondents talked of labor shortages being experienced at all levels.\nARGUING FOR A BETTER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT:\n\nEnd of federal enhanced unemployment beneﬁts. The expiration of federal beneﬁts in some states boosted labor supply and job-ﬁnding rates over the summer, and all remaining such programs expired on September 5. The July and August indicated a cumulative 6pp boost to job-ﬁnding probabilities from June to August for workers losing $300 top-up payments and a 12pp boost for workers losing all beneﬁts.Some of the 6mn workers who lost some or all beneﬁts on September 5 got a job by September 18—in time to be counted in tomorrow’s data.Goldman assumes a +200k boost to job growth from this channel, with a larger increase in subsequent reports (+1.3mn cumulatively by year end).\n\n\n\nSchool reopening. The largest 100 school districts are all open for in-person learning, catalyzing the return of many previously furloughed teachers and support staff. While full normalization of employment levels would contribute 600k jobs (mom sa, see left panel of the chart below), some janitors and support staff did not return due to hybrid teaching models, and job openings in the sector are only 200k above the pre-crisis level (see right panel). Relatedly, the BLS’s seasonal factors already embed the usual rehiring of education workers on summer layoff, so if fewer janitors returned to work than in a typical September, this would reduce seasonally adjusted job growth, other things equal. Taken together, assume a roughly 150k boost from the reopening of schools in tomorrow’s report.\n\n\n\nJob availability. The Conference Board labor differential—the difference between the percent of respondents saying jobs are plentiful and those saying jobs are hardto get - edged down to 42.5 from 44.4, still an elevated level. Additionally, JOLTS job openings increased by 749k in July to a new record high of 10.9mn.\nADP.Private sector employment in the ADP report increased by 568k in September, above consensus expectations for a 430k gain, implying strong growth in the underlying ADP sample. Additionally, schools generally do not use ADP payroll software, arguing for a larger gain from school reopening in the official payroll measure.\n\nARGUING FOR A WEAKER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT:\n\nDelta variant.Rebounding covid infection rates weighed on services consumption and the labor market in August. And while US case counts began to decline in early September, restaurant seatings on Open Table rebounded only marginally. leisure and hospitality employment rose in September, but probably not at the ~400k monthly pace of June and July.\nEmployer surveys. The employment components of our business surveys were flat to down, whereas we and consensus forecast a pickup in job growth. Goldman's services survey employment tracker remained unchanged at 54.5 and the manufacturing survey employment tracker declined 0.4pt to 57.8. And while the Goldman Sachs Analyst Index (GSAI) decreased 0.8% to 68.5, the employment component rose1.9% to 71.9.\n\nNEUTRAL FACTORS:\n\nBig Data.High-frequency data on the labor market were mixed between the August and September survey weeks, on net providing little guidance about the underlying pace of job growth. Three of the five measures tracked indicate an at-or-above-consensus gain (Census Small Business Pulse +0.5mn, ADP +0.6mn,Google mobility +2mn), but the Homebase data was an outlier to the downside. At face value, it would indicate a large outright decline in payrolls. The Census Household Pulse (-0.6mn) was also quite weak, though encouragingly, it also indicated a large drop in childcare-related labor supply headwinds as schools reopened.\nSeasonality.The September seasonal hurdle is relatively low: the BLS adjustment factors generally assume a 600-700k decline in private payrolls (which exclude public schools), compared to around -100k on average in July and August. Continued labor shortages encouraged firms to lay off fewer workers at the end of summer. Partially offsetting this tailwind, the September seasonal factors may have evolved unfavorably due to the crisis—specifically by fitting to last September’s reopening-driven job surge (private payrolls +932k mom sa).\nJobless claims.Initial jobless claims fell during the September payroll month, averaging 339k per week vs. 378k in August despite a boost from individuals transitioning or attempting to transition to state programs. Across all employee programs including emergency benefits, continuing claims fell dramatically (-3.3mn)–but again for non-economic reasons (federal enhanced programs expired). Continuing claims in regular state programs decreased 106k from survey week to survey week.\nJob cuts.Announced layoffs reported by Challenger, Gray & Christmas rebounded 11% month-over-month in September after decreasing by 14% over the prior two months (SA by GS). Nonetheless, layoffs remain near the three-decade low on this measure (in 1993).","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1148,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823116942,"gmtCreate":1633597908102,"gmtModify":1633597908562,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823116942","repostId":"2173946751","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1485,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823116005,"gmtCreate":1633597896063,"gmtModify":1633597896181,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823116005","repostId":"2173946751","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1267,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823118108,"gmtCreate":1633597831693,"gmtModify":1633597831850,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823118108","repostId":"1129125427","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1589,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823111384,"gmtCreate":1633597747865,"gmtModify":1633597748007,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823111384","repostId":"1197899038","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197899038","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633597406,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1197899038?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-07 17:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Shiba Inu Are All Skyrocketing Wednesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197899038","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Growing institutional adoption and investor enthusiasm are pumping these cryptos to the next level.\n","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>Growing institutional adoption and investor enthusiasm are pumping these cryptos to the next level.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What happened</b></p>\n<p><b>Bitcoin</b>&nbsp;(CRYPTO:BTC),<b>Bitcoin Cash</b>&nbsp;(CRYPTO:BCH), and<b>Shiba Inu</b>&nbsp;(CRYPTO:SHIB)are up 9.00%, 8.10%, and 26.67% in the past 24 hours, respectively, as of 11:25 a.m. EDT. The three are now trading at $54,656.16, $622.61, and $0.00002301 apiece, respectively. Yesterday, U.S. Bank, the fifth-largest retail bank in the country with $8.6 trillion assets under management, announced it would offer cryptocurrency custody service to investment advisors and fund managers. They will be able to store their private keys (unique passcodes) to Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and&nbsp;<b>Litecoin</b>&nbsp;to their wallets safely with U.S. Bank.</p>\n<p>As for SHIB, investors were euphoric after<b>Tesla</b>'s CEO, Elon Musk, tweeted a picture of his shiba inu dog on top of his Tesla car three days ago. Musk had previously promoted meme cryptocurrencies, and even though the tweet wasn't directly related to SHIB, there's the expectation that Musk will tweet about SHIB in the future. That was enough to send the coin up 220.90% in the past seven days.</p>\n<p><b>So what</b></p>\n<p>Institutional investors are rapidly piling in on the success of Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and other cryptos. For example,&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SI\">Silvergate Capital</a></b>&nbsp;(NYSE:SI), a leading bank that facilitates fund transfers between cryptocurrency exchanges and financial entities (such as banks, venture capital firms, and hedge funds), processed a stunning $240 billion in transaction volume in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTWO\">Q2</a> alone. That's more than 10 times the volume of institutional crypto-fiat transfers it processed in Q2 of last year.</p>\n<p>But the same can't be said for Shiba Inu. It's clear that investors are in it only to make a quick buck. Its fundamental value, as measured by total value locked (TVL) on its native Shibaswap decentralized exchange, amounts to just $291 million. Meanwhile, the token's market cap has surged to nearly $10 billion.</p>\n<p><b>Now what</b></p>\n<p>Since its inception, skeptics have said that Bitcoin and its peers are nothing more than fake internet money. But the result of all this fear and uncertainty is that cryptocurrencies aregaining tractionin every part of the world, especially among developing nations. The volume of cryptocurrency transactions has surged 706% in Central and South Asia and Oceania in the past year. Their total value amounts to a staggering $572.5 billion, or 14% of global crypto transactions. So there's never been a better time to invest in this promising sector.</p>\n<p>But if critics are right about <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, it's that all this excessive speculation surrounding SHIB won't end well. Back in May, SHIB witnessed a similar pump and dump that sent its price down 80% in a matter of days after the spike. So now's a good time for those lucky investors to consolidate the gains and take profits.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Shiba Inu Are All Skyrocketing Wednesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Shiba Inu Are All Skyrocketing Wednesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-07 17:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/10/06/why-bitcoin-bitcoin-cash-and-shiba-inu-are-all-sky/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Growing institutional adoption and investor enthusiasm are pumping these cryptos to the next level.\n\nWhat happened\nBitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC),Bitcoin Cash (CRYPTO:BCH), andShiba Inu (CRYPTO:SHIB)are up ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/10/06/why-bitcoin-bitcoin-cash-and-shiba-inu-are-all-sky/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/10/06/why-bitcoin-bitcoin-cash-and-shiba-inu-are-all-sky/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197899038","content_text":"Growing institutional adoption and investor enthusiasm are pumping these cryptos to the next level.\n\nWhat happened\nBitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC),Bitcoin Cash (CRYPTO:BCH), andShiba Inu (CRYPTO:SHIB)are up 9.00%, 8.10%, and 26.67% in the past 24 hours, respectively, as of 11:25 a.m. EDT. The three are now trading at $54,656.16, $622.61, and $0.00002301 apiece, respectively. Yesterday, U.S. Bank, the fifth-largest retail bank in the country with $8.6 trillion assets under management, announced it would offer cryptocurrency custody service to investment advisors and fund managers. They will be able to store their private keys (unique passcodes) to Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Litecoin to their wallets safely with U.S. Bank.\nAs for SHIB, investors were euphoric afterTesla's CEO, Elon Musk, tweeted a picture of his shiba inu dog on top of his Tesla car three days ago. Musk had previously promoted meme cryptocurrencies, and even though the tweet wasn't directly related to SHIB, there's the expectation that Musk will tweet about SHIB in the future. That was enough to send the coin up 220.90% in the past seven days.\nSo what\nInstitutional investors are rapidly piling in on the success of Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and other cryptos. For example, Silvergate Capital (NYSE:SI), a leading bank that facilitates fund transfers between cryptocurrency exchanges and financial entities (such as banks, venture capital firms, and hedge funds), processed a stunning $240 billion in transaction volume in Q2 alone. That's more than 10 times the volume of institutional crypto-fiat transfers it processed in Q2 of last year.\nBut the same can't be said for Shiba Inu. It's clear that investors are in it only to make a quick buck. Its fundamental value, as measured by total value locked (TVL) on its native Shibaswap decentralized exchange, amounts to just $291 million. Meanwhile, the token's market cap has surged to nearly $10 billion.\nNow what\nSince its inception, skeptics have said that Bitcoin and its peers are nothing more than fake internet money. But the result of all this fear and uncertainty is that cryptocurrencies aregaining tractionin every part of the world, especially among developing nations. The volume of cryptocurrency transactions has surged 706% in Central and South Asia and Oceania in the past year. Their total value amounts to a staggering $572.5 billion, or 14% of global crypto transactions. So there's never been a better time to invest in this promising sector.\nBut if critics are right about one thing, it's that all this excessive speculation surrounding SHIB won't end well. Back in May, SHIB witnessed a similar pump and dump that sent its price down 80% in a matter of days after the spike. So now's a good time for those lucky investors to consolidate the gains and take profits.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":818,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":888236714,"gmtCreate":1631498217038,"gmtModify":1631889509228,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/888236714","repostId":"1144568207","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144568207","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1631497101,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1144568207?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-13 09:38","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144568207","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market.\nA US private equity firm has abandoned a pla","content":"<p>SOHO&nbsp;CHINA&nbsp;shares&nbsp;once&nbsp;tumbled&nbsp;40%&nbsp;in&nbsp;Hong&nbsp;Kong&nbsp;market.</p>\n<p>A US private equity firm has abandoned a planned US$3 billion purchase of Chinese property developer Soho China, with antitrust authorities yet to approve the deal.</p>\n<p>Blackstone had hoped to expand its presence in the country through acquisition of Soho China, which holds prime real estate in cities like Beijing.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-13 09:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SOHO&nbsp;CHINA&nbsp;shares&nbsp;once&nbsp;tumbled&nbsp;40%&nbsp;in&nbsp;Hong&nbsp;Kong&nbsp;market.</p>\n<p>A US private equity firm has abandoned a planned US$3 billion purchase of Chinese property developer Soho China, with antitrust authorities yet to approve the deal.</p>\n<p>Blackstone had hoped to expand its presence in the country through acquisition of Soho China, which holds prime real estate in cities like Beijing.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BX":"黑石","00410":"SOHO中国"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144568207","content_text":"SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market.\nA US private equity firm has abandoned a planned US$3 billion purchase of Chinese property developer Soho China, with antitrust authorities yet to approve the deal.\nBlackstone had hoped to expand its presence in the country through acquisition of Soho China, which holds prime real estate in cities like Beijing.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"00410":0.9,"BX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":44,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":888231889,"gmtCreate":1631498105941,"gmtModify":1631889509247,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/888231889","repostId":"2166303094","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166303094","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631488015,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166303094?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-13 07:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Retail sales, Consumer Price Index: What to know this week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166303094","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have mod","content":"<p>Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have moderated last month after initial reopening surges in demand and price increases earlier this year.</p>\n<p>On the inflation front, the Labor Department's August Consumer Price Index (CPI) is set for release on Tuesday. The print is expected to decelerate on both a monthly and annual basis, suggesting the peak growth rates in prices for consumer goods and service may already have passed during this economic recovery.</p>\n<p>Consensus economists expect the broadest measure of CPI will grow 0.4% in August compared to July, and by 5.3% compared to August 2020. In July, the headline CPI grew 0.5% month-on-month and by 5.4% year-on-year, with the latter representing the fastest annual growth rate since 2008.</p>\n<p>Excluding more volatile food and energy prices, the CPI likely grew 0.3% month-on-month in August to match July's pace. However, on a year-over-year basis, the CPI excluding food and energy prices likely ticked down to a 4.2% rate, or a hair below July's 4.3% rate. That had, in turn, moderated from a 4.5% annual rate in June, which had marked the fastest rise since 1991.</p>\n<p>The multi-year highs in consumer price increases so far this year have coincided with the broadening economic recovery, as more Americans became vaccinated and were more inclined to spend. This especially drove up prices in goods and services closely tied to renewed consumer mobility.</p>\n<p>Used car and truck prices, for instances, rose at least 7.3% in each of April, May and June before decelerating sharply to an only 0.2% rise in July — suggesting an initial wave of demand was finally being unwound as consumers reacclimatized to going back out and companies' supply chains began to catch up with demand. Similar trends have been seen in prices for airline tickets, motor vehicle insurance and apparel prices, which pulled back in July after spiking earlier in late spring and early summer.</p>\n<p>Other categories of consumer prices have seen more sustained increases, especially in food and energy prices. Other services-related areas of consumption have also seen sustained rises, with consumers returning to in-person activities like dining out at bars and restaurants and leisure traveling. The CPI's \"services less energy services\" category has on a monthly basis in every month so far in 2021 except January, mostly recently at a 0.3% clip.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3ba3dcdb70c21ee0f288bf7cd56e371\" tg-width=\"4949\" tg-height=\"3345\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Muhlenberg, PA - March 18: Redner's Quick Shoppe employee Julie Zezenski and Manager Pete Ostrowski work behind the counter at the Redner's Quick Shoppe on Tuckerton Road in Muhlenberg township Thursday afternoon March 18, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images via Getty Images</p>\n<p>\"Although the rise in global CPI inflation earlier this year was concentrated in energy and a narrow set of goods prices linked to supply constraints, the acceleration in food prices, alongside a recent pickup in services price inflation, sends a signal that pandemic-related pressures on prices are broadening,\" JPMorgan economists Nora Szentivanyi and Bruce Kasman wrote in a note last week.</p>\n<p>\"While we believe much of this pressure will prove transitory, inflation should remain elevated through early next year, as rising food and services price inflation offsets a moderation in energy and core goods price gains,\" they added.</p>\n<p>The CPI also serves as another metric pointing to the relative stickiness or transience of inflationary pressures in the recovering economy. Its outsized increases earlier this year — along with increases in the Federal Reserve's preferred inflationary gauge, core personal consumption expenditures — have suggested to some economists that the central bank might be prudent to alter its monetary policies to stave off a sustained overheating of the economy.</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve policymakers, however, have largely stuck to the conviction that inflation will prove transitory in this economy. Central bank officials like Fed Chair Jerome Powell further suggested that a premature policy move could actually backfire by cutting short the recovery in the labor market.</p>\n<p>\"The spike in inflation is so far largely the product of a relatively narrow group of goods and services that have been directly affected by the pandemic and the reopening of the economy,\" Powell said during his speech at the central bank's Jackson Hole symposium in late August.</p>\n<p>\"Some prices — for example, for hotel rooms and airplane tickets — declined sharply during the recession and have now moved back up close to pre-pandemic levels,\" he said. \"The 12-month window we use in computing inflation now captures the rebound in prices but not the initial decline, temporarily elevating reported inflation. These effects, which are adding a few tenths to measured inflation, should wash out over time.\"</p>\n<h2>Retail sales</h2>\n<p>Another closely watched economic data report out this week will be Thursday's retail sales print from the U.S. Commerce Department.</p>\n<p>Consumer spending has retreated in recent months as a boost from stimulus checks and other government support faded compared to earlier this year. In July, retail sales fell by a worse-than-expected 1.1%, which was more than three times greater than the drop expected.</p>\n<p>The August retail sales report will capture more of the impact on spending from the latest jump in coronavirus cases, with infections related to the Delta variant's spread having picked up mid-summer. Consensus economists expect to see sales fall for a back-to-back month, dropping by 0.8% for the month.</p>\n<p>Some service-related spending already slowed in July, suggesting consumers were already going out somewhat less frequently as infections mounted. Food services and drinking places sales increase by 1.7% in July, following a 2.4% monthly gain in June.</p>\n<p>The August retail sales report, however, will not capture any impact on spending related to the national expiration of enhanced unemployment benefits. Throughout the summer, about half of U.S. states had ended pandemic-era federal jobless benefits to try and incentivize unemployed individuals to return to work. The other half of states ended these benefits by Sept. 6.</p>\n<p>Future retail sales reports for September and onward may reflect slowing sales as a result of the expiration of this aid, some economists suggested.</p>\n<p>\"Spending by the unemployed, especially low-income households, has been supported by enhanced unemployment benefits,\" Rubeela Farooqi, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in a note. \"Absent this support, spending outcomes will surely be different, especially if households are less secure about job prospects going forward.\"</p>\n<h2>Economic calendar</h2>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday: </b>Monthly budget statement, August (-$302.1 billion during prior month)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>NFIB Small Business Optimism, August (99.7 during prior month); Real Average Weekly Earnings, year-over-year, August (-0.9% during prior month); Consumer Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.4% expected, 0.5% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Consumer Price Index, year-over-year, August (5.3% expected, 5.4% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, year-over-year (August (4.2% expected, 4.3% in August)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended September 10 (-1.9% during prior week); Empire Manufacturing, September (20.0 expected, 18.3 during prior month); Import Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Industrial Production, month-over-month, August (0.6% expected, 0.9% in July); Capacity Utilization, August (76.4% in August, 76.1% in July); Manufacturing Production, August (0.4% expected, 1.4% in July)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, August (-0.8% expected, -1.1% in July); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, August (-0.5% expected, -0.7% in July); Initial jobless claims, week ended September 11; Continuing Claims, week ended September 4; Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, September (20.0 expected, 19.4 in August); Business inventories, July (0.5% expected, 0.8% in June); Total Net TIC Flows, July ($31.5 billion in June); Total Long-term TIC Flows, July ($110.9 billion in June)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b>University of Michigan Sentiment, September preliminary (72.7 expected, 70.3 in August)</p></li>\n</ul>\n<h2>Earnings calendar</h2>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday: </b>Oracle (ORCL) after market close</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday:</b> Lennar (LEN), FuelCell Energy (FCEL) before market open <b>&nbsp;</b></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>Weber (WEBR) before market open</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li>\n</ul>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Retail sales, Consumer Price Index: What to know this week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRetail sales, Consumer Price Index: What to know this week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-13 07:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retail-sales-consumer-price-index-what-to-know-this-week-145855567.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have moderated last month after initial reopening surges in demand and price increases earlier this year.\nOn...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retail-sales-consumer-price-index-what-to-know-this-week-145855567.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ORCL":"甲骨文","FCEL":"燃料电池能源","WEBR":"Weber Inc.","LEN":"莱纳建筑公司"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retail-sales-consumer-price-index-what-to-know-this-week-145855567.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2166303094","content_text":"Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have moderated last month after initial reopening surges in demand and price increases earlier this year.\nOn the inflation front, the Labor Department's August Consumer Price Index (CPI) is set for release on Tuesday. The print is expected to decelerate on both a monthly and annual basis, suggesting the peak growth rates in prices for consumer goods and service may already have passed during this economic recovery.\nConsensus economists expect the broadest measure of CPI will grow 0.4% in August compared to July, and by 5.3% compared to August 2020. In July, the headline CPI grew 0.5% month-on-month and by 5.4% year-on-year, with the latter representing the fastest annual growth rate since 2008.\nExcluding more volatile food and energy prices, the CPI likely grew 0.3% month-on-month in August to match July's pace. However, on a year-over-year basis, the CPI excluding food and energy prices likely ticked down to a 4.2% rate, or a hair below July's 4.3% rate. That had, in turn, moderated from a 4.5% annual rate in June, which had marked the fastest rise since 1991.\nThe multi-year highs in consumer price increases so far this year have coincided with the broadening economic recovery, as more Americans became vaccinated and were more inclined to spend. This especially drove up prices in goods and services closely tied to renewed consumer mobility.\nUsed car and truck prices, for instances, rose at least 7.3% in each of April, May and June before decelerating sharply to an only 0.2% rise in July — suggesting an initial wave of demand was finally being unwound as consumers reacclimatized to going back out and companies' supply chains began to catch up with demand. Similar trends have been seen in prices for airline tickets, motor vehicle insurance and apparel prices, which pulled back in July after spiking earlier in late spring and early summer.\nOther categories of consumer prices have seen more sustained increases, especially in food and energy prices. Other services-related areas of consumption have also seen sustained rises, with consumers returning to in-person activities like dining out at bars and restaurants and leisure traveling. The CPI's \"services less energy services\" category has on a monthly basis in every month so far in 2021 except January, mostly recently at a 0.3% clip.\nMuhlenberg, PA - March 18: Redner's Quick Shoppe employee Julie Zezenski and Manager Pete Ostrowski work behind the counter at the Redner's Quick Shoppe on Tuckerton Road in Muhlenberg township Thursday afternoon March 18, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images via Getty Images\n\"Although the rise in global CPI inflation earlier this year was concentrated in energy and a narrow set of goods prices linked to supply constraints, the acceleration in food prices, alongside a recent pickup in services price inflation, sends a signal that pandemic-related pressures on prices are broadening,\" JPMorgan economists Nora Szentivanyi and Bruce Kasman wrote in a note last week.\n\"While we believe much of this pressure will prove transitory, inflation should remain elevated through early next year, as rising food and services price inflation offsets a moderation in energy and core goods price gains,\" they added.\nThe CPI also serves as another metric pointing to the relative stickiness or transience of inflationary pressures in the recovering economy. Its outsized increases earlier this year — along with increases in the Federal Reserve's preferred inflationary gauge, core personal consumption expenditures — have suggested to some economists that the central bank might be prudent to alter its monetary policies to stave off a sustained overheating of the economy.\nFederal Reserve policymakers, however, have largely stuck to the conviction that inflation will prove transitory in this economy. Central bank officials like Fed Chair Jerome Powell further suggested that a premature policy move could actually backfire by cutting short the recovery in the labor market.\n\"The spike in inflation is so far largely the product of a relatively narrow group of goods and services that have been directly affected by the pandemic and the reopening of the economy,\" Powell said during his speech at the central bank's Jackson Hole symposium in late August.\n\"Some prices — for example, for hotel rooms and airplane tickets — declined sharply during the recession and have now moved back up close to pre-pandemic levels,\" he said. \"The 12-month window we use in computing inflation now captures the rebound in prices but not the initial decline, temporarily elevating reported inflation. These effects, which are adding a few tenths to measured inflation, should wash out over time.\"\nRetail sales\nAnother closely watched economic data report out this week will be Thursday's retail sales print from the U.S. Commerce Department.\nConsumer spending has retreated in recent months as a boost from stimulus checks and other government support faded compared to earlier this year. In July, retail sales fell by a worse-than-expected 1.1%, which was more than three times greater than the drop expected.\nThe August retail sales report will capture more of the impact on spending from the latest jump in coronavirus cases, with infections related to the Delta variant's spread having picked up mid-summer. Consensus economists expect to see sales fall for a back-to-back month, dropping by 0.8% for the month.\nSome service-related spending already slowed in July, suggesting consumers were already going out somewhat less frequently as infections mounted. Food services and drinking places sales increase by 1.7% in July, following a 2.4% monthly gain in June.\nThe August retail sales report, however, will not capture any impact on spending related to the national expiration of enhanced unemployment benefits. Throughout the summer, about half of U.S. states had ended pandemic-era federal jobless benefits to try and incentivize unemployed individuals to return to work. The other half of states ended these benefits by Sept. 6.\nFuture retail sales reports for September and onward may reflect slowing sales as a result of the expiration of this aid, some economists suggested.\n\"Spending by the unemployed, especially low-income households, has been supported by enhanced unemployment benefits,\" Rubeela Farooqi, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in a note. \"Absent this support, spending outcomes will surely be different, especially if households are less secure about job prospects going forward.\"\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Monthly budget statement, August (-$302.1 billion during prior month)\nTuesday: NFIB Small Business Optimism, August (99.7 during prior month); Real Average Weekly Earnings, year-over-year, August (-0.9% during prior month); Consumer Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.4% expected, 0.5% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Consumer Price Index, year-over-year, August (5.3% expected, 5.4% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, year-over-year (August (4.2% expected, 4.3% in August)\nWednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended September 10 (-1.9% during prior week); Empire Manufacturing, September (20.0 expected, 18.3 during prior month); Import Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Industrial Production, month-over-month, August (0.6% expected, 0.9% in July); Capacity Utilization, August (76.4% in August, 76.1% in July); Manufacturing Production, August (0.4% expected, 1.4% in July)\nThursday: Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, August (-0.8% expected, -1.1% in July); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, August (-0.5% expected, -0.7% in July); Initial jobless claims, week ended September 11; Continuing Claims, week ended September 4; Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, September (20.0 expected, 19.4 in August); Business inventories, July (0.5% expected, 0.8% in June); Total Net TIC Flows, July ($31.5 billion in June); Total Long-term TIC Flows, July ($110.9 billion in June)\nFriday: University of Michigan Sentiment, September preliminary (72.7 expected, 70.3 in August)\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: Oracle (ORCL) after market close\nTuesday: Lennar (LEN), FuelCell Energy (FCEL) before market open  \nWednesday: Weber (WEBR) before market open\nThursday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FCEL":0.9,"LEN":0.9,"ORCL":0.9,"WEBR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":246,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":880096983,"gmtCreate":1630996008942,"gmtModify":1631889509251,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880096983","repostId":"2165334935","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2165334935","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1630995423,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2165334935?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-07 14:17","market":"uk","language":"en","title":"Hyundai to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions of all commercial vehicles by 2028","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2165334935","media":"Reuters","summary":"SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions ","content":"<p>SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions for all its commercial vehicles by 2028 and will cut the price of fuel cell vehicles to battery electric levels two years later.</p>\n<p>The group, which comprises Hyundai Motor Co and Kia Corp, currently has <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> fuel cell bus and one fuel cell truck, the Xcient Hyundai, on the market. There are 115 of the buses on the road in South Korea and 45 of the trucks in operation after they were rolled out in Switzerland last year.</p>\n<p>The two South Korean automakers together offer 20 models of commercial vehicles including trucks, buses and vans, and sold about 287,000 last year.</p>\n<p>The group, whose only other fuel cell vehicle on the market is Hyundai's Nexo SUV, also said it will develop fuel cell vehicles for Kia and its premium Genesis brand, which could be launched after 2025. It did not mention specific targets for fuel cell versions of passenger vehicle models.</p>\n<p>The plans are measured ambitions to push ahead with hydrogen technology despite its relative niche status, while the automakers also expand their battery electric vehicle line-up.</p>\n<p>Advocates assert that hydrogen fuel cells are cleaner than other carbon-cutting methods as they only emit water and heat, but the technology has only seen limited usage in the auto industry amid concerns about high costs, the bulky size of fuel cell systems, the lack of fuelling stations, resale values and the risk of hydrogen explosions.</p>\n<p>Industry-wide, some 10,000-15,000 fuel cell vehicles are produced globally a year compared to 4-5 million electric vehicles, Hyundai said.</p>\n<p>Other major automakers pursuing hydrogen fuel cell technology include Toyota Motor Corp, BMW and Daimler. They have been encouraged as Europe and China have set ambitious emission reduction targets and talk of hydrogen infrastructure support increases.</p>\n<p>Hyundai Motor Group also said it also plans to employ hydrogen fuel cell technology in other areas such as autonomous container transport.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hyundai to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions of all commercial vehicles by 2028</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHyundai to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions of all commercial vehicles by 2028\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-07 14:17</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions for all its commercial vehicles by 2028 and will cut the price of fuel cell vehicles to battery electric levels two years later.</p>\n<p>The group, which comprises Hyundai Motor Co and Kia Corp, currently has <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> fuel cell bus and one fuel cell truck, the Xcient Hyundai, on the market. There are 115 of the buses on the road in South Korea and 45 of the trucks in operation after they were rolled out in Switzerland last year.</p>\n<p>The two South Korean automakers together offer 20 models of commercial vehicles including trucks, buses and vans, and sold about 287,000 last year.</p>\n<p>The group, whose only other fuel cell vehicle on the market is Hyundai's Nexo SUV, also said it will develop fuel cell vehicles for Kia and its premium Genesis brand, which could be launched after 2025. It did not mention specific targets for fuel cell versions of passenger vehicle models.</p>\n<p>The plans are measured ambitions to push ahead with hydrogen technology despite its relative niche status, while the automakers also expand their battery electric vehicle line-up.</p>\n<p>Advocates assert that hydrogen fuel cells are cleaner than other carbon-cutting methods as they only emit water and heat, but the technology has only seen limited usage in the auto industry amid concerns about high costs, the bulky size of fuel cell systems, the lack of fuelling stations, resale values and the risk of hydrogen explosions.</p>\n<p>Industry-wide, some 10,000-15,000 fuel cell vehicles are produced globally a year compared to 4-5 million electric vehicles, Hyundai said.</p>\n<p>Other major automakers pursuing hydrogen fuel cell technology include Toyota Motor Corp, BMW and Daimler. They have been encouraged as Europe and China have set ambitious emission reduction targets and talk of hydrogen infrastructure support increases.</p>\n<p>Hyundai Motor Group also said it also plans to employ hydrogen fuel cell technology in other areas such as autonomous container transport.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HYMLF":"Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2165334935","content_text":"SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions for all its commercial vehicles by 2028 and will cut the price of fuel cell vehicles to battery electric levels two years later.\nThe group, which comprises Hyundai Motor Co and Kia Corp, currently has one fuel cell bus and one fuel cell truck, the Xcient Hyundai, on the market. There are 115 of the buses on the road in South Korea and 45 of the trucks in operation after they were rolled out in Switzerland last year.\nThe two South Korean automakers together offer 20 models of commercial vehicles including trucks, buses and vans, and sold about 287,000 last year.\nThe group, whose only other fuel cell vehicle on the market is Hyundai's Nexo SUV, also said it will develop fuel cell vehicles for Kia and its premium Genesis brand, which could be launched after 2025. It did not mention specific targets for fuel cell versions of passenger vehicle models.\nThe plans are measured ambitions to push ahead with hydrogen technology despite its relative niche status, while the automakers also expand their battery electric vehicle line-up.\nAdvocates assert that hydrogen fuel cells are cleaner than other carbon-cutting methods as they only emit water and heat, but the technology has only seen limited usage in the auto industry amid concerns about high costs, the bulky size of fuel cell systems, the lack of fuelling stations, resale values and the risk of hydrogen explosions.\nIndustry-wide, some 10,000-15,000 fuel cell vehicles are produced globally a year compared to 4-5 million electric vehicles, Hyundai said.\nOther major automakers pursuing hydrogen fuel cell technology include Toyota Motor Corp, BMW and Daimler. They have been encouraged as Europe and China have set ambitious emission reduction targets and talk of hydrogen infrastructure support increases.\nHyundai Motor Group also said it also plans to employ hydrogen fuel cell technology in other areas such as autonomous container transport.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HYMLF":0.9,"HYUD.UK":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":261,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":880098385,"gmtCreate":1630995909747,"gmtModify":1631889509265,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880098385","repostId":"2165880909","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":181,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":880091430,"gmtCreate":1630995865620,"gmtModify":1631889509280,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880091430","repostId":"1147921064","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147921064","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630992496,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147921064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-07 13:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Microsoft, 11 Other Dividend Growth Stocks To Announce Annual Increases In October","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147921064","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nThings were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Things were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors with a 30% boost, several other companies came in with very small increases.</li>\n <li>These increases were enough to keep those companies’ growth streaks going, in hopes for better earnings growth in the future.</li>\n <li>Microsoft and Accenture should announce double-digit boosts in September. Investors can expect increases from nine other long-term income growth companies.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12d5055e3abb83bb4f168f29e8c9f282\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"541\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Jean-Luc Ichard/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>This is the latest in my series of articles where I provide predictions of annual dividend increases for a variety of long-term dividend growth companies. Back at the end of July, I provided predictions for 16 dividend growth companies that have historically announced annual payout increases in August. In this article I’ll look at 11 more dividend growth companies for September.</p>\n<p>In addition to the companies I reviewed, insurer American Financial Group (AFG) marked its 16th year of dividend growth with a 12% increase. The annual payout of $2.24 gives the company a forward yield of 1.63%.</p>\n<p>Here are the results from the August article (the original predictions are availablehere), followed by my predictions for the dividend increases that I’m expecting to be announced in September:</p>\n<p>(All yields are based on stock prices at the market close on Friday, September 3rd.)</p>\n<p><b>Results for Dividend Increase Announcements from August</b></p>\n<p><b>BancFirst Corporation (BANF) – 28 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 10.3 – 14.7% increase to $1.50 - $1.56</p>\n<p>Actual: 5.9% increase to $1.44</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 2.59%</p>\n<p>This is the Oklahoma-based bank’s 2nd year of 6% dividend growth.</p>\n<p><b>Badger Meter (BMI) – 29 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 9.7 – 13.9% increase to $0.79 - $0.82</p>\n<p>Actual: 11.1% increase to $0.80</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.76%</p>\n<p>The flow meter designer and manufacturer returned to its normal level of dividend growth.</p>\n<p><b>Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) – 15 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 13.0 – 16.5% increase to $2.60 - $2.68</p>\n<p>Actual: 11.3% increase to $2.56</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.50%</p>\n<p>I had hoped that the technology company would reward investors with a larger increase. Nevertheless, it’s another year of double-digit growth for Broadridge.</p>\n<p><b>Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) – 12 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.9 – 19.0% increase to $1.88 - $2.00</p>\n<p>Actual: 14.3% increase to $1.92</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.52%</p>\n<p>The strong stock market is powering strong dividend growth from the operator of options markets.</p>\n<p><b>Carlisle Companies (CSL) – 45 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 10.5 – 14.3% increase to $2.32 - $2.40</p>\n<p>Actual: 2.9% increase to $2.16</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.04%</p>\n<p>Although the company’s earnings grew at double digits in the first half of the year, Carlisle’s latest increase was well below its long-term growth rate.</p>\n<p><b>Dover Corporation (DOV) – 66 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.1 – 16.2% increase to $2.20 - $2.30</p>\n<p>Actual: 1.0% increase to $2.00</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.14%</p>\n<p>Dover kept its dividend streak – one of the longest among all publicly traded companies – going with its 2nd year of 1% increases.</p>\n<p><b>Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) – 54 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 1.9 – 3.8% increase to $4.32 - $4.40</p>\n<p>Actual: 0.9% increase to $4.28</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 3.48%</p>\n<p>The hit to urban real estate from the pandemic impacted Federal Realty, which focuses on regions like Washington, D.C., Boston, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.</p>\n<p><b>International Flavors &amp; Fragrances (IFF) – 19 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 2.6 – 3.9% increase to $3.16 - $3.20</p>\n<p>Actual: 2.6% increase to $3.16</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 2.09%</p>\n<p>This is the 2nd year of 3% dividend growth for the specialty chemical company.</p>\n<p><b>Intuit Inc. (INTU) – 11 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.9 – 15.3% increase to $2.64 - $2.72</p>\n<p>Actual: 15.3% increase to $2.72</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.48%</p>\n<p>The financial software firm continued its history of annual double-digit payout growth.</p>\n<p><b>Illinois Tool Works (ITW) – 47 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.4 – 14.0% increase to $5.08 - $5.20</p>\n<p>Actual: 7.0% increase to $4.88</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 2.14%</p>\n<p>Illinois Tool’s heavy debt load held down the company’s latest dividend increase.</p>\n<p><b>Altria Group (MO) – 52 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 1.7 – 3.5% increase to $3.50 - $3.56</p>\n<p>Actual: 4.7% increase to $3.60</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 7.06%</p>\n<p>Altria’s latest increase is an improvement over last year’s 2.4% boost.</p>\n<p><b>Nordson Corporation (NDSN) – 58 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 10.3 – 15.4% increase to $1.72 - $1.80</p>\n<p>Actual: 30.8% increase to $2.04</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.84%</p>\n<p>Nordson’s 34% EPS growth this year powered a dividend boost that more than made up for last year’s small 3% increase.</p>\n<p><b>Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA) – 21 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 9.1 – 13.6 % increase to $0.96 - $1.00</p>\n<p>Actual: 13.6% increase to $1.00</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.59%</p>\n<p>This is Ritchie Bros.’ 3rd straight year of 10%+ dividend growth.</p>\n<p><b>Steris plc (STE) – 17 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 8.8 – 12.5% increase to $1.74 - $1.80</p>\n<p>Actual: 7.5% increase to $1.72</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.79%</p>\n<p>Although Steris’ earnings growth came in at nearly 10%, I overestimated what the healthcare company’s latest increase would be.</p>\n<p><b>Verizon Communications (VZ) – 17 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.2 – 5.2% increase to $2.59 - $2.64</p>\n<p>Actual: 2.0% increase to $2.56</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 4.62%</p>\n<p>Verizon’s latest increase is consistent with its slow growth over the last 5 years.</p>\n<p><b>Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) – 18 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 7.4 – 11.1% increase to $1.16 - $1.20</p>\n<p>Actual: 10.2% increase to $1.19</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.37%</p>\n<p>Westlake Chemical’s increase this year beat the company’s 5-year average growth rate of 8%.</p>\n<p><b>Predictions for Dividend Increases in September</b></p>\n<p>Here are my predictions for the 12 dividend increases I expect in September:</p>\n<p><b>Accenture (ACN) – 16 years of dividend growth</b></p>\n<p>Delivering consulting services to its customers, Accenture has grown rapidly over the last decade, compounding its dividend at more than 16% annually. The company’s dividend growth has slowed in recent years, but it still managed a 10% boost in 2020. With no debt, a payout ratio below 40%, and expected adjusted EPS growth this year of 17%, the company is poised for another year of double-digit dividend growth.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.4 – 14.8% increase to $3.92 - $4.04</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 1.14 – 1.18%</p>\n<p><b>Brady Corporation (BRC) – 35 years</b></p>\n<p>Despite the resurgence of the COVID delta variant, business is returning to normal for Brady. The company manufactures and markets labeling and identification products. Although earnings per share fell 14% in 2020, the company is projecting a return to good growth in 2021, with EPS growth since 2019 of between 5 and 9%. The question is whether this return to normal growth means a larger payout boost than last year’s 1% increase. Although the company is debt free and has a payout ratio below 40%, the company has historically grown dividends very slowly. I think investors are looking at another small increase.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 2.3 – 4.5% increase to $0.90 - $0.92</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 1.74 – 1.78%</p>\n<p><b>The First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC) – 24 years</b></p>\n<p>The parent company for the First National Bank of Long Island, this regional banking company serves customers on Long Island and in New York City. After growing earnings per share by 3% in 2020, growth accelerated to 14% in the first half of 2021. This is due primarily to improving economic conditions as the pandemic recedes, which allowed the company to reduce the amount held for credit losses. Historically, the company has compounded dividends at 7% over the last decade, although the uncertainty with the resurgence of the virus will make that the most that investors can expect.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.9 – 6.6% increase to $0.79 - $0.81</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.83 – 3.93%</p>\n<p><b>Honeywell International (HON) – 10 years</b></p>\n<p>Industrial machinery company Honeywell, with business in aerospace and defense, and building and industrial control, is seeing renewed growth. The company has expanded margins and increased sales across most of its business lines, and is projecting EPS growth of between 12 and 14% for 2021. This will help the company return to its normal dividend growth of around 10% after last year’s 3% boost.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 9.1 – 11.3% increase to $4.06 - $4.14</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 1.78 – 1.81%</p>\n<p><b>Ingredion (INGR) – 10 years</b></p>\n<p>A drop in EPS last year forced the maker of natural food ingredients to report out a minimal dividend increase of less than 2%, well below the average growth rate of 7% over the last 5 years. The company is expecting earnings growth to return this year, with projections in a wide range between 3 and 10% for 2021. With a projected payout ratio below 50%, investors can expect a return to faster dividend growth.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 4.7 – 6.3% increase to $2.68 - $2.72</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.04 – 3.09%</p>\n<p><b>Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) – 18 years</b></p>\n<p>With sales growth across all four business sectors – Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space – Lockheed Martin produced year-over-year earnings growth in the 1st half of the year. The company has boosted its outlook for the full year and is now expecting EPS growth of 10%. Although the defense contractor has a heavy debt load, this hasn’t kept the company from quickly growing its dividend in the past. Investors should expect a boost around the 5-year growth average of 9.5%.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 8.7 – 11.5% increase to $11.30 - $11.60</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.17 – 3.26%</p>\n<p><b>McDonald’s Corporation (MCD) – 45 years</b></p>\n<p>The story of McDonald’s in 2020 is one of many restaurants during the pandemic. After a 20% drop in EPS in 2020, the company’s business has rebounded in the first half of 2021 as more people get vaccinated and they start to feel more comfortable going out. Before the emergence of the Delta variant, McDonald’s adjusted EPS had more than doubled over the first 6 months of the year. The new variant makes business uncertain for the restaurant chain; this uncertainty makes it less likely that the company will resume historical levels of dividend growth. However, it looks like McDonald’s will be able to reward investors with a larger boost than last year’s 3% increase.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 4.3 – 5.8% increase to $5.38 - $5.46</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 2.25 – 2.29%</p>\n<p><b>Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) – 18 years</b></p>\n<p>Microsoft is firing on all cylinders and still growing quickly, despite a market cap of more than $2 trillion. The company recently reported double-digit revenue growth across all sectors, including MS Office products (up 20%) and Azure (up 50%). This revenue growth powered EPS growth of 40%. With little debt and a payout ratio below 30%, investors in Microsoft can expect a very nice boost this year.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 14.3 – 21.4% increase to $2.56 - $2.72</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 0.85 – 0.90%</p>\n<p><b>New Jersey Resources (NJR) – 25 years</b></p>\n<p>The natural gas utility hits the quarter-century mark of dividend growth this year. New Jersey Resources has done better than expected in the first half of the year, and recently increased its full-year adjusted EPS growth guidance to between 1.4% and 6.3%. This will give NJR room for its annual increase, although investors can expect a boost below the company’s 10-year growth average of 6%.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.8 – 5.3% increase to $1.38 - $1.40</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.67 – 3.72%</p>\n<p><b>OGE Energy (OGE) – 14 years</b></p>\n<p>The parent company of Oklahoma Gas &amp; Electric is looking at EPS growth of between 3 and 9% for the full fiscal year. Despite the decent growth for a “boring” utility company, OGE’s payout ratio of nearly 90% limits the company’s dividend growth going forward. Although OGE has a compounded dividend growth rate of 8% over the last decade, investors can expect an announcement of a boost similar to last year’s 4% increase.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.1 – 5.0% increase to $1.66 - $1.69</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 4.65 – 4.74%</p>\n<p><b>Philip Morris International (PM) – 13 years</b></p>\n<p>The tobacco company reported 7% adjusted EPS growth in 2020 and is guiding to another 13% growth in 2021. This growth supports the company’s goal of repurchasing up to $7 billion in stock over the next 3 years. It should also support the continuing growth of the company’s dividend despite a payout ratio above 80%. The company has a 5-year growth rate of 3%; investors can expect a boost close to that level.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 2.9 – 4.2% increase to $4.94 - $5.00</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 4.66 – 4.71%</p>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<p>August’s group of dividend stocks was a mixed bag – while there were some very nice increases for investors, many of them came in below my expectations. The big winners were investors in Nordson; they’re going to benefit from the company’s 30% boost. However, investors in Dover, Federal Realty, and Carlisle are looking at small increases to their income.</p>\n<p>Despite some disappointments, I am still optimistic about dividend growth through the rest of the year. Microsoft and Accenture should reward investors with double-digit percent increases, while investors in Lockheed Martin and Honeywell can look forward to percentage increases in the high single digits. Investors in utilities New Jersey Resources and OGE can also look forward to small increases.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Microsoft, 11 Other Dividend Growth Stocks To Announce Annual Increases In October</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicrosoft, 11 Other Dividend Growth Stocks To Announce Annual Increases In October\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-07 13:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453667-microsoft-11-other-dividend-growth-stocks-to-announce-annual-increases-in-october><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nThings were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors with a 30% boost, several other companies came in with very small increases.\nThese increases were ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453667-microsoft-11-other-dividend-growth-stocks-to-announce-annual-increases-in-october\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CBOE":"芝加哥期权交易所","BMI":"Badger Meter","MSFT":"微软","INGR":"宜瑞安","BRC":"布雷迪","FRT":"FRT信托","NJR":"新泽西能源","LMT":"洛克希德马丁","HON":"霍尼韦尔","WLK":"Westlake Chemical Corp","ITW":"伊利诺伊机械","PM":"菲利普莫里斯","OGE":"OGE Energy Corp","RBA":"里奇兄弟拍卖","IFF":"国际香料香精","ACN":"埃森哲","DOV":"美国都福集团","CSL":"卡莱尔伙伴","FLIC":"第一长岛","STE":"思泰瑞医疗","MCD":"麦当劳","INTU":"财捷","BR":"Broadridge金融解决方案","MO":"奥驰亚"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453667-microsoft-11-other-dividend-growth-stocks-to-announce-annual-increases-in-october","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147921064","content_text":"Summary\n\nThings were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors with a 30% boost, several other companies came in with very small increases.\nThese increases were enough to keep those companies’ growth streaks going, in hopes for better earnings growth in the future.\nMicrosoft and Accenture should announce double-digit boosts in September. Investors can expect increases from nine other long-term income growth companies.\n\nJean-Luc Ichard/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nThis is the latest in my series of articles where I provide predictions of annual dividend increases for a variety of long-term dividend growth companies. Back at the end of July, I provided predictions for 16 dividend growth companies that have historically announced annual payout increases in August. In this article I’ll look at 11 more dividend growth companies for September.\nIn addition to the companies I reviewed, insurer American Financial Group (AFG) marked its 16th year of dividend growth with a 12% increase. The annual payout of $2.24 gives the company a forward yield of 1.63%.\nHere are the results from the August article (the original predictions are availablehere), followed by my predictions for the dividend increases that I’m expecting to be announced in September:\n(All yields are based on stock prices at the market close on Friday, September 3rd.)\nResults for Dividend Increase Announcements from August\nBancFirst Corporation (BANF) – 28 years\nPrediction: 10.3 – 14.7% increase to $1.50 - $1.56\nActual: 5.9% increase to $1.44\nForward yield: 2.59%\nThis is the Oklahoma-based bank’s 2nd year of 6% dividend growth.\nBadger Meter (BMI) – 29 years\nPrediction: 9.7 – 13.9% increase to $0.79 - $0.82\nActual: 11.1% increase to $0.80\nForward yield: 0.76%\nThe flow meter designer and manufacturer returned to its normal level of dividend growth.\nBroadridge Financial Solutions (BR) – 15 years\nPrediction: 13.0 – 16.5% increase to $2.60 - $2.68\nActual: 11.3% increase to $2.56\nForward yield: 1.50%\nI had hoped that the technology company would reward investors with a larger increase. Nevertheless, it’s another year of double-digit growth for Broadridge.\nCboe Global Markets (CBOE) – 12 years\nPrediction: 11.9 – 19.0% increase to $1.88 - $2.00\nActual: 14.3% increase to $1.92\nForward yield: 1.52%\nThe strong stock market is powering strong dividend growth from the operator of options markets.\nCarlisle Companies (CSL) – 45 years\nPrediction: 10.5 – 14.3% increase to $2.32 - $2.40\nActual: 2.9% increase to $2.16\nForward yield: 1.04%\nAlthough the company’s earnings grew at double digits in the first half of the year, Carlisle’s latest increase was well below its long-term growth rate.\nDover Corporation (DOV) – 66 years\nPrediction: 11.1 – 16.2% increase to $2.20 - $2.30\nActual: 1.0% increase to $2.00\nForward yield: 1.14%\nDover kept its dividend streak – one of the longest among all publicly traded companies – going with its 2nd year of 1% increases.\nFederal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) – 54 years\nPrediction: 1.9 – 3.8% increase to $4.32 - $4.40\nActual: 0.9% increase to $4.28\nForward yield: 3.48%\nThe hit to urban real estate from the pandemic impacted Federal Realty, which focuses on regions like Washington, D.C., Boston, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.\nInternational Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) – 19 years\nPrediction: 2.6 – 3.9% increase to $3.16 - $3.20\nActual: 2.6% increase to $3.16\nForward yield: 2.09%\nThis is the 2nd year of 3% dividend growth for the specialty chemical company.\nIntuit Inc. (INTU) – 11 years\nPrediction: 11.9 – 15.3% increase to $2.64 - $2.72\nActual: 15.3% increase to $2.72\nForward yield: 0.48%\nThe financial software firm continued its history of annual double-digit payout growth.\nIllinois Tool Works (ITW) – 47 years\nPrediction: 11.4 – 14.0% increase to $5.08 - $5.20\nActual: 7.0% increase to $4.88\nForward yield: 2.14%\nIllinois Tool’s heavy debt load held down the company’s latest dividend increase.\nAltria Group (MO) – 52 years\nPrediction: 1.7 – 3.5% increase to $3.50 - $3.56\nActual: 4.7% increase to $3.60\nForward yield: 7.06%\nAltria’s latest increase is an improvement over last year’s 2.4% boost.\nNordson Corporation (NDSN) – 58 years\nPrediction: 10.3 – 15.4% increase to $1.72 - $1.80\nActual: 30.8% increase to $2.04\nForward yield: 0.84%\nNordson’s 34% EPS growth this year powered a dividend boost that more than made up for last year’s small 3% increase.\nRitchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA) – 21 years\nPrediction: 9.1 – 13.6 % increase to $0.96 - $1.00\nActual: 13.6% increase to $1.00\nForward yield: 1.59%\nThis is Ritchie Bros.’ 3rd straight year of 10%+ dividend growth.\nSteris plc (STE) – 17 years\nPrediction: 8.8 – 12.5% increase to $1.74 - $1.80\nActual: 7.5% increase to $1.72\nForward yield: 0.79%\nAlthough Steris’ earnings growth came in at nearly 10%, I overestimated what the healthcare company’s latest increase would be.\nVerizon Communications (VZ) – 17 years\nPrediction: 3.2 – 5.2% increase to $2.59 - $2.64\nActual: 2.0% increase to $2.56\nForward yield: 4.62%\nVerizon’s latest increase is consistent with its slow growth over the last 5 years.\nWestlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) – 18 years\nPrediction: 7.4 – 11.1% increase to $1.16 - $1.20\nActual: 10.2% increase to $1.19\nForward yield: 1.37%\nWestlake Chemical’s increase this year beat the company’s 5-year average growth rate of 8%.\nPredictions for Dividend Increases in September\nHere are my predictions for the 12 dividend increases I expect in September:\nAccenture (ACN) – 16 years of dividend growth\nDelivering consulting services to its customers, Accenture has grown rapidly over the last decade, compounding its dividend at more than 16% annually. The company’s dividend growth has slowed in recent years, but it still managed a 10% boost in 2020. With no debt, a payout ratio below 40%, and expected adjusted EPS growth this year of 17%, the company is poised for another year of double-digit dividend growth.\nPrediction: 11.4 – 14.8% increase to $3.92 - $4.04\nPredicted Forward Yield: 1.14 – 1.18%\nBrady Corporation (BRC) – 35 years\nDespite the resurgence of the COVID delta variant, business is returning to normal for Brady. The company manufactures and markets labeling and identification products. Although earnings per share fell 14% in 2020, the company is projecting a return to good growth in 2021, with EPS growth since 2019 of between 5 and 9%. The question is whether this return to normal growth means a larger payout boost than last year’s 1% increase. Although the company is debt free and has a payout ratio below 40%, the company has historically grown dividends very slowly. I think investors are looking at another small increase.\nPrediction: 2.3 – 4.5% increase to $0.90 - $0.92\nPredicted Forward Yield: 1.74 – 1.78%\nThe First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC) – 24 years\nThe parent company for the First National Bank of Long Island, this regional banking company serves customers on Long Island and in New York City. After growing earnings per share by 3% in 2020, growth accelerated to 14% in the first half of 2021. This is due primarily to improving economic conditions as the pandemic recedes, which allowed the company to reduce the amount held for credit losses. Historically, the company has compounded dividends at 7% over the last decade, although the uncertainty with the resurgence of the virus will make that the most that investors can expect.\nPrediction: 3.9 – 6.6% increase to $0.79 - $0.81\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.83 – 3.93%\nHoneywell International (HON) – 10 years\nIndustrial machinery company Honeywell, with business in aerospace and defense, and building and industrial control, is seeing renewed growth. The company has expanded margins and increased sales across most of its business lines, and is projecting EPS growth of between 12 and 14% for 2021. This will help the company return to its normal dividend growth of around 10% after last year’s 3% boost.\nPrediction: 9.1 – 11.3% increase to $4.06 - $4.14\nPredicted Forward Yield: 1.78 – 1.81%\nIngredion (INGR) – 10 years\nA drop in EPS last year forced the maker of natural food ingredients to report out a minimal dividend increase of less than 2%, well below the average growth rate of 7% over the last 5 years. The company is expecting earnings growth to return this year, with projections in a wide range between 3 and 10% for 2021. With a projected payout ratio below 50%, investors can expect a return to faster dividend growth.\nPrediction: 4.7 – 6.3% increase to $2.68 - $2.72\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.04 – 3.09%\nLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) – 18 years\nWith sales growth across all four business sectors – Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space – Lockheed Martin produced year-over-year earnings growth in the 1st half of the year. The company has boosted its outlook for the full year and is now expecting EPS growth of 10%. Although the defense contractor has a heavy debt load, this hasn’t kept the company from quickly growing its dividend in the past. Investors should expect a boost around the 5-year growth average of 9.5%.\nPrediction: 8.7 – 11.5% increase to $11.30 - $11.60\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.17 – 3.26%\nMcDonald’s Corporation (MCD) – 45 years\nThe story of McDonald’s in 2020 is one of many restaurants during the pandemic. After a 20% drop in EPS in 2020, the company’s business has rebounded in the first half of 2021 as more people get vaccinated and they start to feel more comfortable going out. Before the emergence of the Delta variant, McDonald’s adjusted EPS had more than doubled over the first 6 months of the year. The new variant makes business uncertain for the restaurant chain; this uncertainty makes it less likely that the company will resume historical levels of dividend growth. However, it looks like McDonald’s will be able to reward investors with a larger boost than last year’s 3% increase.\nPrediction: 4.3 – 5.8% increase to $5.38 - $5.46\nPredicted Forward Yield: 2.25 – 2.29%\nMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT) – 18 years\nMicrosoft is firing on all cylinders and still growing quickly, despite a market cap of more than $2 trillion. The company recently reported double-digit revenue growth across all sectors, including MS Office products (up 20%) and Azure (up 50%). This revenue growth powered EPS growth of 40%. With little debt and a payout ratio below 30%, investors in Microsoft can expect a very nice boost this year.\nPrediction: 14.3 – 21.4% increase to $2.56 - $2.72\nPredicted Forward Yield: 0.85 – 0.90%\nNew Jersey Resources (NJR) – 25 years\nThe natural gas utility hits the quarter-century mark of dividend growth this year. New Jersey Resources has done better than expected in the first half of the year, and recently increased its full-year adjusted EPS growth guidance to between 1.4% and 6.3%. This will give NJR room for its annual increase, although investors can expect a boost below the company’s 10-year growth average of 6%.\nPrediction: 3.8 – 5.3% increase to $1.38 - $1.40\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.67 – 3.72%\nOGE Energy (OGE) – 14 years\nThe parent company of Oklahoma Gas & Electric is looking at EPS growth of between 3 and 9% for the full fiscal year. Despite the decent growth for a “boring” utility company, OGE’s payout ratio of nearly 90% limits the company’s dividend growth going forward. Although OGE has a compounded dividend growth rate of 8% over the last decade, investors can expect an announcement of a boost similar to last year’s 4% increase.\nPrediction: 3.1 – 5.0% increase to $1.66 - $1.69\nPredicted Forward Yield: 4.65 – 4.74%\nPhilip Morris International (PM) – 13 years\nThe tobacco company reported 7% adjusted EPS growth in 2020 and is guiding to another 13% growth in 2021. This growth supports the company’s goal of repurchasing up to $7 billion in stock over the next 3 years. It should also support the continuing growth of the company’s dividend despite a payout ratio above 80%. The company has a 5-year growth rate of 3%; investors can expect a boost close to that level.\nPrediction: 2.9 – 4.2% increase to $4.94 - $5.00\nPredicted Forward Yield: 4.66 – 4.71%\nSummary\nAugust’s group of dividend stocks was a mixed bag – while there were some very nice increases for investors, many of them came in below my expectations. The big winners were investors in Nordson; they’re going to benefit from the company’s 30% boost. However, investors in Dover, Federal Realty, and Carlisle are looking at small increases to their income.\nDespite some disappointments, I am still optimistic about dividend growth through the rest of the year. Microsoft and Accenture should reward investors with double-digit percent increases, while investors in Lockheed Martin and Honeywell can look forward to percentage increases in the high single digits. Investors in utilities New Jersey Resources and OGE can also look forward to small increases.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ACN":0.9,"BMI":0.9,"BR":0.9,"BRC":0.9,"CBOE":0.9,"CSL":0.9,"DOV":0.9,"FLIC":0.9,"FRT":0.9,"HON":0.9,"IFF":0.9,"INGR":0.9,"INTU":0.9,"ITW":0.9,"LMT":0.9,"MCD":0.9,"MO":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"NJR":0.9,"OGE":0.9,"PM":0.9,"RBA":0.9,"STE":0.9,"WLK":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":209,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":812915184,"gmtCreate":1630546326148,"gmtModify":1631889509289,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/812915184","repostId":"2164481941","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":188,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818787497,"gmtCreate":1630450586119,"gmtModify":1631889509301,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Better","listText":"Better","text":"Better","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818787497","repostId":"1180856610","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":388,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818785615,"gmtCreate":1630450497337,"gmtModify":1631889509318,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818785615","repostId":"2163868409","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2163868409","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630422217,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2163868409?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-31 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Virgin Galactic Jumps as Jefferies Rates it Buy on Growing Demand","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2163868409","media":"Investing.com","summary":"Investing.com – Virgin Galactic stock (NYSE:SPCE) rose nearly 7% Tuesday as Jefferies (NYSE:JEF) ini","content":"<p>Investing.com – Virgin Galactic stock (NYSE:SPCE) rose nearly 7% Tuesday as Jefferies (NYSE:JEF) initiated its coverage with a buy rating and a $33 target, an upside of 24.5% approximately from the stock’s current level of $26.50.</p>\n<p>Analyst Greg Konrad sees attractive long-term prospects of space tourism that could eventually yield a $1.7-billion-revenue company by 2030.</p>\n<p>The total addressable market for Virgin Galactic is seen as high as $120 billion. Konrad expects 250,000 travelers at a $450,000 ticket price in less than 10 years from now.</p>\n<p>The analyst also pinned his belief that Virgin Galactic can get to 660 flights per year by 2030.</p>\n<p>The analyst says Virgin Galactic has a simple business model centered around building spaceships to meet demand. He expects the company to have four spaceships by 2025.</p>\n<p>According to the analyst, the company’s business model has been de-risked through recent flights and there are upcoming catalysts for the stock including reopening of seat sales and concrete plans on increasing spaceship capacity.</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Virgin Galactic Jumps as Jefferies Rates it Buy on Growing Demand</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVirgin Galactic Jumps as Jefferies Rates it Buy on Growing Demand\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-31 23:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/virgin-galactic-jumps-jefferies-rates-100037900.html><strong>Investing.com</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investing.com – Virgin Galactic stock (NYSE:SPCE) rose nearly 7% Tuesday as Jefferies (NYSE:JEF) initiated its coverage with a buy rating and a $33 target, an upside of 24.5% approximately from the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/virgin-galactic-jumps-jefferies-rates-100037900.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPCE":"维珍银河"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/virgin-galactic-jumps-jefferies-rates-100037900.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2163868409","content_text":"Investing.com – Virgin Galactic stock (NYSE:SPCE) rose nearly 7% Tuesday as Jefferies (NYSE:JEF) initiated its coverage with a buy rating and a $33 target, an upside of 24.5% approximately from the stock’s current level of $26.50.\nAnalyst Greg Konrad sees attractive long-term prospects of space tourism that could eventually yield a $1.7-billion-revenue company by 2030.\nThe total addressable market for Virgin Galactic is seen as high as $120 billion. Konrad expects 250,000 travelers at a $450,000 ticket price in less than 10 years from now.\nThe analyst also pinned his belief that Virgin Galactic can get to 660 flights per year by 2030.\nThe analyst says Virgin Galactic has a simple business model centered around building spaceships to meet demand. He expects the company to have four spaceships by 2025.\nAccording to the analyst, the company’s business model has been de-risked through recent flights and there are upcoming catalysts for the stock including reopening of seat sales and concrete plans on increasing spaceship capacity.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPCE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":434,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818785013,"gmtCreate":1630450452032,"gmtModify":1631889509329,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818785013","repostId":"1145804281","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145804281","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630420947,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145804281?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-31 22:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Top India Carmaker Says Output to Drop 40% on Chip Crisis","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145804281","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge nex","content":"<p>Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge next month as the semiconductor shortage hits production.</p>\n<p>Total volume could be about 40% of normal output in September, the company said in an exchange filing Tuesday.</p>\n<p>“Owing to a supply constraint of electronic components due to the semiconductor shortage situation, the company is expecting an adverse impact on vehicle production,” it said, adding that its factory in Haryana and contract-manufacturing partner Suzuki Motor Gujarat Pvt. will both be impacted.</p>\n<p>India’s automobile industry, which was reeling from its worst-ever slowdown, was hit again by waves of Covid-19 infections, which shuttered factories and dealerships. In addition, the global semiconductor shortage has crippled production and climbing commodity prices has raised input costs.</p>\n<p>Maruti is expecting the global semiconductor crunch tolast for about a year&nbsp;and is adjusting production to match chip supply, Shashank Srivastava, executive director for marketing and sales, said last month.</p>\n<p>Suzuki Motor Corp.earlier this month&nbsp;warned&nbsp;the global chip shortage will affect it through March. Masahiko Nagao, Suzuki’s senior managing director, said the company is working with suppliers on procurement and will address the issue “speedily.” The carmaker has started talks with suppliers about longer-term contracts, he said.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Top India Carmaker Says Output to Drop 40% on Chip Crisis</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTop India Carmaker Says Output to Drop 40% on Chip Crisis\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-31 22:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/top-india-carmaker-says-output-to-drop-40-on-chip-crisis><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge next month as the semiconductor shortage hits production.\nTotal volume could be about 40% of normal ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/top-india-carmaker-says-output-to-drop-40-on-chip-crisis\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SZKMF":"Suzuki Motor Co."},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/top-india-carmaker-says-output-to-drop-40-on-chip-crisis","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145804281","content_text":"Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge next month as the semiconductor shortage hits production.\nTotal volume could be about 40% of normal output in September, the company said in an exchange filing Tuesday.\n“Owing to a supply constraint of electronic components due to the semiconductor shortage situation, the company is expecting an adverse impact on vehicle production,” it said, adding that its factory in Haryana and contract-manufacturing partner Suzuki Motor Gujarat Pvt. will both be impacted.\nIndia’s automobile industry, which was reeling from its worst-ever slowdown, was hit again by waves of Covid-19 infections, which shuttered factories and dealerships. In addition, the global semiconductor shortage has crippled production and climbing commodity prices has raised input costs.\nMaruti is expecting the global semiconductor crunch tolast for about a year and is adjusting production to match chip supply, Shashank Srivastava, executive director for marketing and sales, said last month.\nSuzuki Motor Corp.earlier this month warned the global chip shortage will affect it through March. Masahiko Nagao, Suzuki’s senior managing director, said the company is working with suppliers on procurement and will address the issue “speedily.” The carmaker has started talks with suppliers about longer-term contracts, he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SZKMF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":325,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":821918161,"gmtCreate":1633684923516,"gmtModify":1633684923640,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821918161","repostId":"1135993400","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1135993400","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633675137,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1135993400?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-08 14:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"September Payrolls Preview: It Will Be A Beat, The Question Is How Big","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1135993400","media":"zerohedge","summary":"After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the mo","content":"<p>After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the most important economic data point of the week, and the month, Friday's nonfarm payrolls report due at 830am ET on Friday, where consensus expects a 500K print- more than double last month's disappointing 235K print - as well as a drop in the unemployment rate to 5.1% and an increase in average hourly earnings to 4.6%. And unlike last month, when wecorrectly predicted the big miss in August payrolls, this time we agree that tomorrow's report will be a beat, the only question is how big.</p>\n<p>Here is a snapshot of what to expect tomorrow:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Total Payrolls: 500K, Last 235K</li>\n <li>Private Payrolls: 450K, Last 243K</li>\n <li>Unemployment Rate: 5.1%, Last 5.2%</li>\n <li>Labor force participation rate: 61.8%, Last 61.7%</li>\n <li>Average Hourly Earnings Y/Y: 4.6%, Last 4.3%</li>\n <li>Average Weekly Hours: 34.7, Last 34.7</li>\n</ul>\n<p>As&nbsp;Newsquawk&nbsp;writes in its NFP preview, September’s jobs data, the last before the Fed’s November 3rd policy meeting, will be framed in the context of the central bank’s expected taper announcement, where a merely satisfactory report would likely to be enough for the FOMC to greenlight a November announcement to scale-back its USD 120BN/month asset purchases.</p>\n<p>Goldman economists are more bullish than normal, and estimate nonfarm payrolls rose 600k in September, above consensus of +500k, and they note that \"labor demand remains very strong,&nbsp;<b>and we believe the nationwide expiration of enhanced unemployment beneﬁts on September 5 boosted effective labor supply and job growth—as it did in July and August in states that ended federal beneﬁts early.\"</b>As a result, Goldman is assuming a 200k boost in tomorrow’s numbers and a larger boost in October. The bank also believes the reopening of schools contributed to September job growth, by around 150k. Despite these tailwinds, Big Data employment signals were mixed, and dining activity rebounded only marginally.</p>\n<p>Labor market proxies have been constructive for the month: ADP’s gauge of payrolls surprised to the upside, although analysts continue to note that the direct relationship between the official data and the ADP’s gauge is tenuous, despite the gap being under 100k over the last three reports. The number of initial jobless claims and continuing claims has eased back between the survey periods of the August and September jobs data, although analysts note that more recent releases have shown an uptick in claims potentially clouding the outlook. The ISM business surveys have signaled employment growth in the month, with manufacturing employment rising into growth territory again, but services sector hiring cooled a little in the month, but remains expansionary; survey commentary continues to allude to a tight labour market. The Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the September employment situation report at 13:30BST/08:30EDT on October 8th.</p>\n<p><b>POLICY</b>: The September jobs report might have reduced relevance on trading conditions given that Fed officials have effectively confirmed that, barring a collapse in the jobs data, it is on course to announce a tapering of its asset purchases at the November 3rd meeting. Accordingly, trading risks may be skewed to the downside, rather than to the upside, where a significant payrolls miss may present obstacles to the Fed announcing its taper. Additionally, it is worth being cognizant of how efforts in Washington to raise the debt ceiling are progressing; as yet, officials have not struck a deal, and are in the process of enacting stop gap legislation to allow funding into December; some analysts suggest that the Fed may be reticent to tighten policy in the face of potential default risks.</p>\n<p><b>PAYROLLS:</b>The consensus looks for 500k nonfarm payrolls to be added to the US economy in September (prev. 235k), which would be a cooler rate of growth than the three- and six-month average rate, though in line with the 12-month average (3-month average is 750k/month, the six-month average is 653k/month, and the 12-month average is 503k/month – that technically at least suggests an improving rate of payrolls growth in recent months).<b>Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.</b></p>\n<p><b>MEASURES OF SLACK:</b>The Unemployment Rate is expected at 5.1% (prev. 5.2%); Labour Force Participation previously at 61.7% vs 63.2% pre-pandemic; U6 measure of underemployment was previously at 8.8% vs 7.0% prepandemic; Employment-population ratio was previously 58.5% vs 61.1% pre-pandemic. These measures of slack are likely to provide more insight into how Fed officials are judging labour market progress, with many in recent months noting that they are closely watching the Underemployment Rate, Participation Rate, and the Employment-Population Ratio for a better handle on the level of slack that remains in the economy. Analysts would be encouraged the closer these get to pre-pandemic levels.</p>\n<p><b>EARNINGS:</b>Average Hourly Earnings expected at +0.4% M/M (prev. +0.6%); Average Hourly Earnings expected at +4. 6% Y/Y (prev. +4.3%); Average Workweek Hours expected at 34.7hrs (prev. 34.7hrs). Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans still remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.</p>\n<p><b>ADP:</b>The ADP National Employment Report showed 568k jobs added to the US economy in September, topping expectations for 428k, and a better pace than the prior 340k (revised down from 374k initially reported). ADP itself said that the labor market recovery continued to make progress despite the marked slowdown in the rate of job additions from the 748k pace seen in Q2. It also noted that Leisure &amp; Hospitality remained one of the biggest beneficiaries to the recovery, though said that hiring was still heavily impacted by the trajectory of the pandemic, especially for small firms. ADP thinks that the current bottlenecks in hiring will likely fade as the pandemic situation continues to improve, and that could set the stage for solid job gains in the months ahead. On the data methodology, analysts continue to note that ADP's model incorporates much of the prior official payrolls data, other macroeconomic variables, as well as data from its own payrolls platform; \"Payrolls were soft in August, thanks to the hit to the services sector from the Delta variant, and that weakness likely constrained ADP data,\" Pantheon Macroeconomics said. \"The overshoot to consensus, therefore, suggests that the other inputs to ADP’s model were stronger than we expected, but none of the details are published, so we don’t know if the overshoot was model-driven or due to stronger employment data at ADP’s clients.\"</p>\n<p><b>INITIAL JOBLESS CLAIMS:</b>Initial jobless claims data for the week that coincides with the BLS jobs report survey window saw claims at around 351k – little changed from the 349k for the August jobs data survey window – where analysts said seasonal factors played a role in boosting the weekly data, while there may have been some lingering Hurricane Ida effects; the corresponding continuing claims data has fallen to 2.802mln in the September survey period vs 2.908mln in the August survey period. In aggregate, the data continues to point to declining trend, although in recent weeks the level of jobless claims has been picking up again.</p>\n<p><b>BUSINESS SURVEYS</b>: The Services and Manufacturing ISM reports showed divergent trends in September, with the service sector employment sub-index easing a little to 53.0 from 53.7, signalling growth but at a slower rate, while the manufacturing employment sub-index rose back into expansionary territory, printing 50.2 from 49.0 prior. On the manufacturing sector, ISM said companies were still struggling to meet labour-management plans, but noted some modest signs of progress compared to previous months: \"Less than 5% of comments noted improvements regarding employment, compared to none in August,\" it said, \"an overwhelming majority of panelists indicate their companies are hiring or attempting to hire,\" where around 85% of responses were about seeking additional staffing, while nearly half of the respondents expressed difficulty in filling positions, an increase from August. \"The increasing frequency of comments on turnover rates and retirements continued a trend that began in August,\" ISM said. Meanwhile, in the services sector, employment activity rose for a third straight month; respondents noted that employees were flocking to better-paying jobs and there was a lack of pipeline to replace these staff, while other respondents talked of labor shortages being experienced at all levels.</p>\n<p><b>ARGUING FOR A BETTER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT</b>:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>End of federal enhanced unemployment beneﬁts</b>. The expiration of federal beneﬁts in some states boosted labor supply and job-ﬁnding rates over the summer, and all remaining such programs expired on September 5. The July and August indicated a cumulative 6pp boost to job-ﬁnding probabilities from June to August for workers losing $300 top-up payments and a 12pp boost for workers losing all beneﬁts.<b>Some of the 6mn workers who lost some or all beneﬁts on September 5 got a job by September 18—in time to be counted in tomorrow’s data.</b>Goldman assumes a +200k boost to job growth from this channel, with a larger increase in subsequent reports (+1.3mn cumulatively by year end).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8e5900cf66c76d4b64055f84e58048\" tg-width=\"630\" tg-height=\"428\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>School reopening</b>. The largest 100 school districts are all open for in-person learning, catalyzing the return of many previously furloughed teachers and support staff. While full normalization of employment levels would contribute 600k jobs (mom sa, see left panel of the chart below), some janitors and support staff did not return due to hybrid teaching models, and job openings in the sector are only 200k above the pre-crisis level (see right panel). Relatedly, the BLS’s seasonal factors already embed the usual rehiring of education workers on summer layoff, so if fewer janitors returned to work than in a typical September, this would reduce seasonally adjusted job growth, other things equal. Taken together, assume a roughly 150k boost from the reopening of schools in tomorrow’s report.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff3e69723b40e0d372ec2bebecb38b1f\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"376\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Job availability</b>. The Conference Board labor differential—the difference between the percent of respondents saying jobs are plentiful and those saying jobs are hardto get - edged down to 42.5 from 44.4, still an elevated level. Additionally, JOLTS job openings increased by 749k in July to a new record high of 10.9mn.</li>\n <li><b>ADP.</b>Private sector employment in the ADP report increased by 568k in September, above consensus expectations for a 430k gain, implying strong growth in the underlying ADP sample. Additionally, schools generally do not use ADP payroll software, arguing for a larger gain from school reopening in the official payroll measure.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>ARGUING FOR A WEAKER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT:</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Delta variant.</b>Rebounding covid infection rates weighed on services consumption and the labor market in August. And while US case counts began to decline in early September, restaurant seatings on Open Table rebounded only marginally. leisure and hospitality employment rose in September, but probably not at the ~400k monthly pace of June and July.</li>\n <li><b>Employer surveys</b>. The employment components of our business surveys were flat to down, whereas we and consensus forecast a pickup in job growth. Goldman's services survey employment tracker remained unchanged at 54.5 and the manufacturing survey employment tracker declined 0.4pt to 57.8. And while the Goldman Sachs Analyst Index (GSAI) decreased 0.8% to 68.5, the employment component rose1.9% to 71.9.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>NEUTRAL FACTORS:</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Big Data.</b>High-frequency data on the labor market were mixed between the August and September survey weeks, on net providing little guidance about the underlying pace of job growth. Three of the five measures tracked indicate an at-or-above-consensus gain (Census Small Business Pulse +0.5mn, ADP +0.6mn,Google mobility +2mn), but the Homebase data was an outlier to the downside. At face value, it would indicate a large outright decline in payrolls. The Census Household Pulse (-0.6mn) was also quite weak, though encouragingly, it also indicated a large drop in childcare-related labor supply headwinds as schools reopened.</li>\n <li><b>Seasonality.</b>The September seasonal hurdle is relatively low: the BLS adjustment factors generally assume a 600-700k decline in private payrolls (which exclude public schools), compared to around -100k on average in July and August. Continued labor shortages encouraged firms to lay off fewer workers at the end of summer. Partially offsetting this tailwind, the September seasonal factors may have evolved unfavorably due to the crisis—specifically by fitting to last September’s reopening-driven job surge (private payrolls +932k mom sa).</li>\n <li><b>Jobless claims.</b>Initial jobless claims fell during the September payroll month, averaging 339k per week vs. 378k in August despite a boost from individuals transitioning or attempting to transition to state programs. Across all employee programs including emergency benefits, continuing claims fell dramatically (-3.3mn)–but again for non-economic reasons (federal enhanced programs expired). Continuing claims in regular state programs decreased 106k from survey week to survey week.</li>\n <li><b>Job cuts.</b>Announced layoffs reported by Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas rebounded 11% month-over-month in September after decreasing by 14% over the prior two months (SA by GS). Nonetheless, layoffs remain near the three-decade low on this measure (in 1993).</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>September Payrolls Preview: It Will Be A Beat, The Question Is How Big</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSeptember Payrolls Preview: It Will Be A Beat, The Question Is How Big\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-08 14:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/september-payrolls-preview-it-will-be-beat-question-how-big><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the most important economic data point of the week, and the month, Friday's nonfarm payrolls report due at...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/september-payrolls-preview-it-will-be-beat-question-how-big\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/september-payrolls-preview-it-will-be-beat-question-how-big","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1135993400","content_text":"After a strong initial claims report and a solid ADP private payrolls print, all eyes turn to the most important economic data point of the week, and the month, Friday's nonfarm payrolls report due at 830am ET on Friday, where consensus expects a 500K print- more than double last month's disappointing 235K print - as well as a drop in the unemployment rate to 5.1% and an increase in average hourly earnings to 4.6%. And unlike last month, when wecorrectly predicted the big miss in August payrolls, this time we agree that tomorrow's report will be a beat, the only question is how big.\nHere is a snapshot of what to expect tomorrow:\n\nTotal Payrolls: 500K, Last 235K\nPrivate Payrolls: 450K, Last 243K\nUnemployment Rate: 5.1%, Last 5.2%\nLabor force participation rate: 61.8%, Last 61.7%\nAverage Hourly Earnings Y/Y: 4.6%, Last 4.3%\nAverage Weekly Hours: 34.7, Last 34.7\n\nAs Newsquawk writes in its NFP preview, September’s jobs data, the last before the Fed’s November 3rd policy meeting, will be framed in the context of the central bank’s expected taper announcement, where a merely satisfactory report would likely to be enough for the FOMC to greenlight a November announcement to scale-back its USD 120BN/month asset purchases.\nGoldman economists are more bullish than normal, and estimate nonfarm payrolls rose 600k in September, above consensus of +500k, and they note that \"labor demand remains very strong, and we believe the nationwide expiration of enhanced unemployment beneﬁts on September 5 boosted effective labor supply and job growth—as it did in July and August in states that ended federal beneﬁts early.\"As a result, Goldman is assuming a 200k boost in tomorrow’s numbers and a larger boost in October. The bank also believes the reopening of schools contributed to September job growth, by around 150k. Despite these tailwinds, Big Data employment signals were mixed, and dining activity rebounded only marginally.\nLabor market proxies have been constructive for the month: ADP’s gauge of payrolls surprised to the upside, although analysts continue to note that the direct relationship between the official data and the ADP’s gauge is tenuous, despite the gap being under 100k over the last three reports. The number of initial jobless claims and continuing claims has eased back between the survey periods of the August and September jobs data, although analysts note that more recent releases have shown an uptick in claims potentially clouding the outlook. The ISM business surveys have signaled employment growth in the month, with manufacturing employment rising into growth territory again, but services sector hiring cooled a little in the month, but remains expansionary; survey commentary continues to allude to a tight labour market. The Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the September employment situation report at 13:30BST/08:30EDT on October 8th.\nPOLICY: The September jobs report might have reduced relevance on trading conditions given that Fed officials have effectively confirmed that, barring a collapse in the jobs data, it is on course to announce a tapering of its asset purchases at the November 3rd meeting. Accordingly, trading risks may be skewed to the downside, rather than to the upside, where a significant payrolls miss may present obstacles to the Fed announcing its taper. Additionally, it is worth being cognizant of how efforts in Washington to raise the debt ceiling are progressing; as yet, officials have not struck a deal, and are in the process of enacting stop gap legislation to allow funding into December; some analysts suggest that the Fed may be reticent to tighten policy in the face of potential default risks.\nPAYROLLS:The consensus looks for 500k nonfarm payrolls to be added to the US economy in September (prev. 235k), which would be a cooler rate of growth than the three- and six-month average rate, though in line with the 12-month average (3-month average is 750k/month, the six-month average is 653k/month, and the 12-month average is 503k/month – that technically at least suggests an improving rate of payrolls growth in recent months).Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.\nMEASURES OF SLACK:The Unemployment Rate is expected at 5.1% (prev. 5.2%); Labour Force Participation previously at 61.7% vs 63.2% pre-pandemic; U6 measure of underemployment was previously at 8.8% vs 7.0% prepandemic; Employment-population ratio was previously 58.5% vs 61.1% pre-pandemic. These measures of slack are likely to provide more insight into how Fed officials are judging labour market progress, with many in recent months noting that they are closely watching the Underemployment Rate, Participation Rate, and the Employment-Population Ratio for a better handle on the level of slack that remains in the economy. Analysts would be encouraged the closer these get to pre-pandemic levels.\nEARNINGS:Average Hourly Earnings expected at +0.4% M/M (prev. +0.6%); Average Hourly Earnings expected at +4. 6% Y/Y (prev. +4.3%); Average Workweek Hours expected at 34.7hrs (prev. 34.7hrs). Aggregating the nonfarm payrolls data since March 2020, around 5.33mln Americans still remain out of work relative to pre-pandemic levels.\nADP:The ADP National Employment Report showed 568k jobs added to the US economy in September, topping expectations for 428k, and a better pace than the prior 340k (revised down from 374k initially reported). ADP itself said that the labor market recovery continued to make progress despite the marked slowdown in the rate of job additions from the 748k pace seen in Q2. It also noted that Leisure & Hospitality remained one of the biggest beneficiaries to the recovery, though said that hiring was still heavily impacted by the trajectory of the pandemic, especially for small firms. ADP thinks that the current bottlenecks in hiring will likely fade as the pandemic situation continues to improve, and that could set the stage for solid job gains in the months ahead. On the data methodology, analysts continue to note that ADP's model incorporates much of the prior official payrolls data, other macroeconomic variables, as well as data from its own payrolls platform; \"Payrolls were soft in August, thanks to the hit to the services sector from the Delta variant, and that weakness likely constrained ADP data,\" Pantheon Macroeconomics said. \"The overshoot to consensus, therefore, suggests that the other inputs to ADP’s model were stronger than we expected, but none of the details are published, so we don’t know if the overshoot was model-driven or due to stronger employment data at ADP’s clients.\"\nINITIAL JOBLESS CLAIMS:Initial jobless claims data for the week that coincides with the BLS jobs report survey window saw claims at around 351k – little changed from the 349k for the August jobs data survey window – where analysts said seasonal factors played a role in boosting the weekly data, while there may have been some lingering Hurricane Ida effects; the corresponding continuing claims data has fallen to 2.802mln in the September survey period vs 2.908mln in the August survey period. In aggregate, the data continues to point to declining trend, although in recent weeks the level of jobless claims has been picking up again.\nBUSINESS SURVEYS: The Services and Manufacturing ISM reports showed divergent trends in September, with the service sector employment sub-index easing a little to 53.0 from 53.7, signalling growth but at a slower rate, while the manufacturing employment sub-index rose back into expansionary territory, printing 50.2 from 49.0 prior. On the manufacturing sector, ISM said companies were still struggling to meet labour-management plans, but noted some modest signs of progress compared to previous months: \"Less than 5% of comments noted improvements regarding employment, compared to none in August,\" it said, \"an overwhelming majority of panelists indicate their companies are hiring or attempting to hire,\" where around 85% of responses were about seeking additional staffing, while nearly half of the respondents expressed difficulty in filling positions, an increase from August. \"The increasing frequency of comments on turnover rates and retirements continued a trend that began in August,\" ISM said. Meanwhile, in the services sector, employment activity rose for a third straight month; respondents noted that employees were flocking to better-paying jobs and there was a lack of pipeline to replace these staff, while other respondents talked of labor shortages being experienced at all levels.\nARGUING FOR A BETTER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT:\n\nEnd of federal enhanced unemployment beneﬁts. The expiration of federal beneﬁts in some states boosted labor supply and job-ﬁnding rates over the summer, and all remaining such programs expired on September 5. The July and August indicated a cumulative 6pp boost to job-ﬁnding probabilities from June to August for workers losing $300 top-up payments and a 12pp boost for workers losing all beneﬁts.Some of the 6mn workers who lost some or all beneﬁts on September 5 got a job by September 18—in time to be counted in tomorrow’s data.Goldman assumes a +200k boost to job growth from this channel, with a larger increase in subsequent reports (+1.3mn cumulatively by year end).\n\n\n\nSchool reopening. The largest 100 school districts are all open for in-person learning, catalyzing the return of many previously furloughed teachers and support staff. While full normalization of employment levels would contribute 600k jobs (mom sa, see left panel of the chart below), some janitors and support staff did not return due to hybrid teaching models, and job openings in the sector are only 200k above the pre-crisis level (see right panel). Relatedly, the BLS’s seasonal factors already embed the usual rehiring of education workers on summer layoff, so if fewer janitors returned to work than in a typical September, this would reduce seasonally adjusted job growth, other things equal. Taken together, assume a roughly 150k boost from the reopening of schools in tomorrow’s report.\n\n\n\nJob availability. The Conference Board labor differential—the difference between the percent of respondents saying jobs are plentiful and those saying jobs are hardto get - edged down to 42.5 from 44.4, still an elevated level. Additionally, JOLTS job openings increased by 749k in July to a new record high of 10.9mn.\nADP.Private sector employment in the ADP report increased by 568k in September, above consensus expectations for a 430k gain, implying strong growth in the underlying ADP sample. Additionally, schools generally do not use ADP payroll software, arguing for a larger gain from school reopening in the official payroll measure.\n\nARGUING FOR A WEAKER-THAN-EXPECTED REPORT:\n\nDelta variant.Rebounding covid infection rates weighed on services consumption and the labor market in August. And while US case counts began to decline in early September, restaurant seatings on Open Table rebounded only marginally. leisure and hospitality employment rose in September, but probably not at the ~400k monthly pace of June and July.\nEmployer surveys. The employment components of our business surveys were flat to down, whereas we and consensus forecast a pickup in job growth. Goldman's services survey employment tracker remained unchanged at 54.5 and the manufacturing survey employment tracker declined 0.4pt to 57.8. And while the Goldman Sachs Analyst Index (GSAI) decreased 0.8% to 68.5, the employment component rose1.9% to 71.9.\n\nNEUTRAL FACTORS:\n\nBig Data.High-frequency data on the labor market were mixed between the August and September survey weeks, on net providing little guidance about the underlying pace of job growth. Three of the five measures tracked indicate an at-or-above-consensus gain (Census Small Business Pulse +0.5mn, ADP +0.6mn,Google mobility +2mn), but the Homebase data was an outlier to the downside. At face value, it would indicate a large outright decline in payrolls. The Census Household Pulse (-0.6mn) was also quite weak, though encouragingly, it also indicated a large drop in childcare-related labor supply headwinds as schools reopened.\nSeasonality.The September seasonal hurdle is relatively low: the BLS adjustment factors generally assume a 600-700k decline in private payrolls (which exclude public schools), compared to around -100k on average in July and August. Continued labor shortages encouraged firms to lay off fewer workers at the end of summer. Partially offsetting this tailwind, the September seasonal factors may have evolved unfavorably due to the crisis—specifically by fitting to last September’s reopening-driven job surge (private payrolls +932k mom sa).\nJobless claims.Initial jobless claims fell during the September payroll month, averaging 339k per week vs. 378k in August despite a boost from individuals transitioning or attempting to transition to state programs. Across all employee programs including emergency benefits, continuing claims fell dramatically (-3.3mn)–but again for non-economic reasons (federal enhanced programs expired). Continuing claims in regular state programs decreased 106k from survey week to survey week.\nJob cuts.Announced layoffs reported by Challenger, Gray & Christmas rebounded 11% month-over-month in September after decreasing by 14% over the prior two months (SA by GS). Nonetheless, layoffs remain near the three-decade low on this measure (in 1993).","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1148,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":813874324,"gmtCreate":1630193787668,"gmtModify":1704956787426,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813874324","repostId":"2162707824","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162707824","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1630104635,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162707824?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-28 06:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. resumes supply of Lilly's COVID-19 antibody combo to some states","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162707824","media":"Reuters","summary":"Aug 27 (Reuters) - U.S. health officials on Friday decided to resume the supply of Eli Lilly's COVID","content":"<p>Aug 27 (Reuters) - U.S. health officials on Friday decided to resume the supply of Eli Lilly's COVID-19 antibody cocktail to states where variants resistant to it are low, saying the therapy could work against the fast-spreading Delta variant based on lab studies.</p>\n<p>The Department of Health and Human Services narrowed the scope of authorization for the dual-antibody therapy, bamlanivimab and etesevimab, to states including Colorado, Connecticut and Illinois, Indiana.</p>\n<p>With the Delta variant becoming the dominant strain, the prevalence of variants resistant to the therapy is steadily decreasing, the agency said</p>\n<p>Based on lab tests, the drugs administered together are expected to retain activity against the Delta variant, but not against Delta plus and variants first identified in Brazil, South Africa and Colombia, it said.</p>\n<p>The department had in June paused its distribution after the therapy failed to show effectiveness against the coronavirus variants that were first identified in Brazil and South Africa.</p>\n<p>The supply of standalone etesevimab to be paired with existing supply of bamlanivimab is also being resumed to some states.</p>\n<p>Regeneron's antibody therapy REGEN-COV, and GlaxoSmithKline Plc and partner Vir Biotechnology's</p>\n<p>sotrovimab may be used in all states, territories, and U.S. jurisdictions as they are likely to be effective against most variants including Delta, the agency said.</p>\n<p>Bamlanivimab and etesevimab, REGEN-COV and sotrovimab are authorized for use in people 12 years and above with mild-to-moderate infection and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. resumes supply of Lilly's COVID-19 antibody combo to some states</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. resumes supply of Lilly's COVID-19 antibody combo to some states\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-28 06:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Aug 27 (Reuters) - U.S. health officials on Friday decided to resume the supply of Eli Lilly's COVID-19 antibody cocktail to states where variants resistant to it are low, saying the therapy could work against the fast-spreading Delta variant based on lab studies.</p>\n<p>The Department of Health and Human Services narrowed the scope of authorization for the dual-antibody therapy, bamlanivimab and etesevimab, to states including Colorado, Connecticut and Illinois, Indiana.</p>\n<p>With the Delta variant becoming the dominant strain, the prevalence of variants resistant to the therapy is steadily decreasing, the agency said</p>\n<p>Based on lab tests, the drugs administered together are expected to retain activity against the Delta variant, but not against Delta plus and variants first identified in Brazil, South Africa and Colombia, it said.</p>\n<p>The department had in June paused its distribution after the therapy failed to show effectiveness against the coronavirus variants that were first identified in Brazil and South Africa.</p>\n<p>The supply of standalone etesevimab to be paired with existing supply of bamlanivimab is also being resumed to some states.</p>\n<p>Regeneron's antibody therapy REGEN-COV, and GlaxoSmithKline Plc and partner Vir Biotechnology's</p>\n<p>sotrovimab may be used in all states, territories, and U.S. jurisdictions as they are likely to be effective against most variants including Delta, the agency said.</p>\n<p>Bamlanivimab and etesevimab, REGEN-COV and sotrovimab are authorized for use in people 12 years and above with mild-to-moderate infection and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LLY":"礼来","VIR":"Vir Biotechnology, Inc.","REGN":"再生元制药公司"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162707824","content_text":"Aug 27 (Reuters) - U.S. health officials on Friday decided to resume the supply of Eli Lilly's COVID-19 antibody cocktail to states where variants resistant to it are low, saying the therapy could work against the fast-spreading Delta variant based on lab studies.\nThe Department of Health and Human Services narrowed the scope of authorization for the dual-antibody therapy, bamlanivimab and etesevimab, to states including Colorado, Connecticut and Illinois, Indiana.\nWith the Delta variant becoming the dominant strain, the prevalence of variants resistant to the therapy is steadily decreasing, the agency said\nBased on lab tests, the drugs administered together are expected to retain activity against the Delta variant, but not against Delta plus and variants first identified in Brazil, South Africa and Colombia, it said.\nThe department had in June paused its distribution after the therapy failed to show effectiveness against the coronavirus variants that were first identified in Brazil and South Africa.\nThe supply of standalone etesevimab to be paired with existing supply of bamlanivimab is also being resumed to some states.\nRegeneron's antibody therapy REGEN-COV, and GlaxoSmithKline Plc and partner Vir Biotechnology's\nsotrovimab may be used in all states, territories, and U.S. jurisdictions as they are likely to be effective against most variants including Delta, the agency said.\nBamlanivimab and etesevimab, REGEN-COV and sotrovimab are authorized for use in people 12 years and above with mild-to-moderate infection and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LLY":0.9,"REGN":0.9,"VIR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":114,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818787497,"gmtCreate":1630450586119,"gmtModify":1631889509301,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Better","listText":"Better","text":"Better","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818787497","repostId":"1180856610","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":388,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":813875261,"gmtCreate":1630193732053,"gmtModify":1704956786903,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813875261","repostId":"2162358024","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":54,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":872845728,"gmtCreate":1637487987945,"gmtModify":1637487988055,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$good","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8896774c53c06a301e585c7a87269fb2","width":"1080","height":"3650"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872845728","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":958,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":880098385,"gmtCreate":1630995909747,"gmtModify":1631889509265,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880098385","repostId":"2165880909","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":181,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":824382806,"gmtCreate":1634279720129,"gmtModify":1634279720231,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/824382806","repostId":"2175191891","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2175191891","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1634279654,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2175191891?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-15 14:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S.Korea targets Apple over new app store regulation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2175191891","media":"Reuters","summary":"SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new re","content":"<p>SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new requirements that it stop forcing app developers to use its payment systems, with a government official warning of a possible investigation into the iPhone maker's compliance.</p>\n<p>The development comes after South Korea amended the Telecommunication Business Act in August to try to curb the tech majors' market dominance and stop the big app store operators such as Apple and Alphabet Inc's Google from charging commissions on in-app purchases.</p>\n<p>The law went into effect last month but Apple had told the South Korean government that it was already complying and did not need to change its app store policy, a Korea Communications Commission (KCC) official in charge of the matter told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"This goes against the purpose of the amended law,\" the official said, requesting anonymity as the KCC was still in talks with Apple on compliance.</p>\n<p>The regulator would ask Apple's South Korean unit for a new company policy giving greater autonomy in payment methods, and if Apple failed to comply, would consider measures such as a fact-finding probe as a precursor to possible fines or other penalties.</p>\n<p>Apple did not immediately reply to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>Google had informed the KCC that it planned to comply with the law, including allowing third-party payment systems, and would discuss the matter with the regulator starting next week, the KCC official said.</p>\n<p>Google did not immediately reply to a Reuters' request for comment.</p>\n<p>Jung Jong-chae, a lawyer specialising in antitrust matters, said Apple had more to lose than Google from the Korean regulation.</p>\n<p>\"Differences between Apple and Google in willingness to give ground may be because Apple controls everything from hardware to operating system (OS) to app market to payment system,\" he told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"And (Apple) has more to lose if its dominance breaks on any front, which could lead to calls for openness on other fronts.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S.Korea targets Apple over new app store regulation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS.Korea targets Apple over new app store regulation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-15 14:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new requirements that it stop forcing app developers to use its payment systems, with a government official warning of a possible investigation into the iPhone maker's compliance.</p>\n<p>The development comes after South Korea amended the Telecommunication Business Act in August to try to curb the tech majors' market dominance and stop the big app store operators such as Apple and Alphabet Inc's Google from charging commissions on in-app purchases.</p>\n<p>The law went into effect last month but Apple had told the South Korean government that it was already complying and did not need to change its app store policy, a Korea Communications Commission (KCC) official in charge of the matter told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"This goes against the purpose of the amended law,\" the official said, requesting anonymity as the KCC was still in talks with Apple on compliance.</p>\n<p>The regulator would ask Apple's South Korean unit for a new company policy giving greater autonomy in payment methods, and if Apple failed to comply, would consider measures such as a fact-finding probe as a precursor to possible fines or other penalties.</p>\n<p>Apple did not immediately reply to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>Google had informed the KCC that it planned to comply with the law, including allowing third-party payment systems, and would discuss the matter with the regulator starting next week, the KCC official said.</p>\n<p>Google did not immediately reply to a Reuters' request for comment.</p>\n<p>Jung Jong-chae, a lawyer specialising in antitrust matters, said Apple had more to lose than Google from the Korean regulation.</p>\n<p>\"Differences between Apple and Google in willingness to give ground may be because Apple controls everything from hardware to operating system (OS) to app market to payment system,\" he told Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"And (Apple) has more to lose if its dominance breaks on any front, which could lead to calls for openness on other fronts.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2175191891","content_text":"SEOUL, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Apple Inc was on a collision course with South Korea on Friday over new requirements that it stop forcing app developers to use its payment systems, with a government official warning of a possible investigation into the iPhone maker's compliance.\nThe development comes after South Korea amended the Telecommunication Business Act in August to try to curb the tech majors' market dominance and stop the big app store operators such as Apple and Alphabet Inc's Google from charging commissions on in-app purchases.\nThe law went into effect last month but Apple had told the South Korean government that it was already complying and did not need to change its app store policy, a Korea Communications Commission (KCC) official in charge of the matter told Reuters.\n\"This goes against the purpose of the amended law,\" the official said, requesting anonymity as the KCC was still in talks with Apple on compliance.\nThe regulator would ask Apple's South Korean unit for a new company policy giving greater autonomy in payment methods, and if Apple failed to comply, would consider measures such as a fact-finding probe as a precursor to possible fines or other penalties.\nApple did not immediately reply to a request for comment.\nGoogle had informed the KCC that it planned to comply with the law, including allowing third-party payment systems, and would discuss the matter with the regulator starting next week, the KCC official said.\nGoogle did not immediately reply to a Reuters' request for comment.\nJung Jong-chae, a lawyer specialising in antitrust matters, said Apple had more to lose than Google from the Korean regulation.\n\"Differences between Apple and Google in willingness to give ground may be because Apple controls everything from hardware to operating system (OS) to app market to payment system,\" he told Reuters.\n\"And (Apple) has more to lose if its dominance breaks on any front, which could lead to calls for openness on other fronts.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9,"GOOGL":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1052,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":888231889,"gmtCreate":1631498105941,"gmtModify":1631889509247,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/888231889","repostId":"2166303094","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166303094","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631488015,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166303094?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-13 07:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Retail sales, Consumer Price Index: What to know this week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166303094","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have mod","content":"<p>Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have moderated last month after initial reopening surges in demand and price increases earlier this year.</p>\n<p>On the inflation front, the Labor Department's August Consumer Price Index (CPI) is set for release on Tuesday. The print is expected to decelerate on both a monthly and annual basis, suggesting the peak growth rates in prices for consumer goods and service may already have passed during this economic recovery.</p>\n<p>Consensus economists expect the broadest measure of CPI will grow 0.4% in August compared to July, and by 5.3% compared to August 2020. In July, the headline CPI grew 0.5% month-on-month and by 5.4% year-on-year, with the latter representing the fastest annual growth rate since 2008.</p>\n<p>Excluding more volatile food and energy prices, the CPI likely grew 0.3% month-on-month in August to match July's pace. However, on a year-over-year basis, the CPI excluding food and energy prices likely ticked down to a 4.2% rate, or a hair below July's 4.3% rate. That had, in turn, moderated from a 4.5% annual rate in June, which had marked the fastest rise since 1991.</p>\n<p>The multi-year highs in consumer price increases so far this year have coincided with the broadening economic recovery, as more Americans became vaccinated and were more inclined to spend. This especially drove up prices in goods and services closely tied to renewed consumer mobility.</p>\n<p>Used car and truck prices, for instances, rose at least 7.3% in each of April, May and June before decelerating sharply to an only 0.2% rise in July — suggesting an initial wave of demand was finally being unwound as consumers reacclimatized to going back out and companies' supply chains began to catch up with demand. Similar trends have been seen in prices for airline tickets, motor vehicle insurance and apparel prices, which pulled back in July after spiking earlier in late spring and early summer.</p>\n<p>Other categories of consumer prices have seen more sustained increases, especially in food and energy prices. Other services-related areas of consumption have also seen sustained rises, with consumers returning to in-person activities like dining out at bars and restaurants and leisure traveling. The CPI's \"services less energy services\" category has on a monthly basis in every month so far in 2021 except January, mostly recently at a 0.3% clip.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3ba3dcdb70c21ee0f288bf7cd56e371\" tg-width=\"4949\" tg-height=\"3345\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Muhlenberg, PA - March 18: Redner's Quick Shoppe employee Julie Zezenski and Manager Pete Ostrowski work behind the counter at the Redner's Quick Shoppe on Tuckerton Road in Muhlenberg township Thursday afternoon March 18, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images via Getty Images</p>\n<p>\"Although the rise in global CPI inflation earlier this year was concentrated in energy and a narrow set of goods prices linked to supply constraints, the acceleration in food prices, alongside a recent pickup in services price inflation, sends a signal that pandemic-related pressures on prices are broadening,\" JPMorgan economists Nora Szentivanyi and Bruce Kasman wrote in a note last week.</p>\n<p>\"While we believe much of this pressure will prove transitory, inflation should remain elevated through early next year, as rising food and services price inflation offsets a moderation in energy and core goods price gains,\" they added.</p>\n<p>The CPI also serves as another metric pointing to the relative stickiness or transience of inflationary pressures in the recovering economy. Its outsized increases earlier this year — along with increases in the Federal Reserve's preferred inflationary gauge, core personal consumption expenditures — have suggested to some economists that the central bank might be prudent to alter its monetary policies to stave off a sustained overheating of the economy.</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve policymakers, however, have largely stuck to the conviction that inflation will prove transitory in this economy. Central bank officials like Fed Chair Jerome Powell further suggested that a premature policy move could actually backfire by cutting short the recovery in the labor market.</p>\n<p>\"The spike in inflation is so far largely the product of a relatively narrow group of goods and services that have been directly affected by the pandemic and the reopening of the economy,\" Powell said during his speech at the central bank's Jackson Hole symposium in late August.</p>\n<p>\"Some prices — for example, for hotel rooms and airplane tickets — declined sharply during the recession and have now moved back up close to pre-pandemic levels,\" he said. \"The 12-month window we use in computing inflation now captures the rebound in prices but not the initial decline, temporarily elevating reported inflation. These effects, which are adding a few tenths to measured inflation, should wash out over time.\"</p>\n<h2>Retail sales</h2>\n<p>Another closely watched economic data report out this week will be Thursday's retail sales print from the U.S. Commerce Department.</p>\n<p>Consumer spending has retreated in recent months as a boost from stimulus checks and other government support faded compared to earlier this year. In July, retail sales fell by a worse-than-expected 1.1%, which was more than three times greater than the drop expected.</p>\n<p>The August retail sales report will capture more of the impact on spending from the latest jump in coronavirus cases, with infections related to the Delta variant's spread having picked up mid-summer. Consensus economists expect to see sales fall for a back-to-back month, dropping by 0.8% for the month.</p>\n<p>Some service-related spending already slowed in July, suggesting consumers were already going out somewhat less frequently as infections mounted. Food services and drinking places sales increase by 1.7% in July, following a 2.4% monthly gain in June.</p>\n<p>The August retail sales report, however, will not capture any impact on spending related to the national expiration of enhanced unemployment benefits. Throughout the summer, about half of U.S. states had ended pandemic-era federal jobless benefits to try and incentivize unemployed individuals to return to work. The other half of states ended these benefits by Sept. 6.</p>\n<p>Future retail sales reports for September and onward may reflect slowing sales as a result of the expiration of this aid, some economists suggested.</p>\n<p>\"Spending by the unemployed, especially low-income households, has been supported by enhanced unemployment benefits,\" Rubeela Farooqi, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in a note. \"Absent this support, spending outcomes will surely be different, especially if households are less secure about job prospects going forward.\"</p>\n<h2>Economic calendar</h2>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday: </b>Monthly budget statement, August (-$302.1 billion during prior month)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>NFIB Small Business Optimism, August (99.7 during prior month); Real Average Weekly Earnings, year-over-year, August (-0.9% during prior month); Consumer Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.4% expected, 0.5% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Consumer Price Index, year-over-year, August (5.3% expected, 5.4% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, year-over-year (August (4.2% expected, 4.3% in August)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended September 10 (-1.9% during prior week); Empire Manufacturing, September (20.0 expected, 18.3 during prior month); Import Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Industrial Production, month-over-month, August (0.6% expected, 0.9% in July); Capacity Utilization, August (76.4% in August, 76.1% in July); Manufacturing Production, August (0.4% expected, 1.4% in July)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, August (-0.8% expected, -1.1% in July); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, August (-0.5% expected, -0.7% in July); Initial jobless claims, week ended September 11; Continuing Claims, week ended September 4; Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, September (20.0 expected, 19.4 in August); Business inventories, July (0.5% expected, 0.8% in June); Total Net TIC Flows, July ($31.5 billion in June); Total Long-term TIC Flows, July ($110.9 billion in June)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b>University of Michigan Sentiment, September preliminary (72.7 expected, 70.3 in August)</p></li>\n</ul>\n<h2>Earnings calendar</h2>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday: </b>Oracle (ORCL) after market close</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday:</b> Lennar (LEN), FuelCell Energy (FCEL) before market open <b>&nbsp;</b></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>Weber (WEBR) before market open</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li>\n</ul>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Retail sales, Consumer Price Index: What to know this week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRetail sales, Consumer Price Index: What to know this week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-13 07:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retail-sales-consumer-price-index-what-to-know-this-week-145855567.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have moderated last month after initial reopening surges in demand and price increases earlier this year.\nOn...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retail-sales-consumer-price-index-what-to-know-this-week-145855567.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ORCL":"甲骨文","FCEL":"燃料电池能源","WEBR":"Weber Inc.","LEN":"莱纳建筑公司"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retail-sales-consumer-price-index-what-to-know-this-week-145855567.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2166303094","content_text":"Traders this week will be focused on new data on inflation and spending. Each are likely to have moderated last month after initial reopening surges in demand and price increases earlier this year.\nOn the inflation front, the Labor Department's August Consumer Price Index (CPI) is set for release on Tuesday. The print is expected to decelerate on both a monthly and annual basis, suggesting the peak growth rates in prices for consumer goods and service may already have passed during this economic recovery.\nConsensus economists expect the broadest measure of CPI will grow 0.4% in August compared to July, and by 5.3% compared to August 2020. In July, the headline CPI grew 0.5% month-on-month and by 5.4% year-on-year, with the latter representing the fastest annual growth rate since 2008.\nExcluding more volatile food and energy prices, the CPI likely grew 0.3% month-on-month in August to match July's pace. However, on a year-over-year basis, the CPI excluding food and energy prices likely ticked down to a 4.2% rate, or a hair below July's 4.3% rate. That had, in turn, moderated from a 4.5% annual rate in June, which had marked the fastest rise since 1991.\nThe multi-year highs in consumer price increases so far this year have coincided with the broadening economic recovery, as more Americans became vaccinated and were more inclined to spend. This especially drove up prices in goods and services closely tied to renewed consumer mobility.\nUsed car and truck prices, for instances, rose at least 7.3% in each of April, May and June before decelerating sharply to an only 0.2% rise in July — suggesting an initial wave of demand was finally being unwound as consumers reacclimatized to going back out and companies' supply chains began to catch up with demand. Similar trends have been seen in prices for airline tickets, motor vehicle insurance and apparel prices, which pulled back in July after spiking earlier in late spring and early summer.\nOther categories of consumer prices have seen more sustained increases, especially in food and energy prices. Other services-related areas of consumption have also seen sustained rises, with consumers returning to in-person activities like dining out at bars and restaurants and leisure traveling. The CPI's \"services less energy services\" category has on a monthly basis in every month so far in 2021 except January, mostly recently at a 0.3% clip.\nMuhlenberg, PA - March 18: Redner's Quick Shoppe employee Julie Zezenski and Manager Pete Ostrowski work behind the counter at the Redner's Quick Shoppe on Tuckerton Road in Muhlenberg township Thursday afternoon March 18, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images via Getty Images\n\"Although the rise in global CPI inflation earlier this year was concentrated in energy and a narrow set of goods prices linked to supply constraints, the acceleration in food prices, alongside a recent pickup in services price inflation, sends a signal that pandemic-related pressures on prices are broadening,\" JPMorgan economists Nora Szentivanyi and Bruce Kasman wrote in a note last week.\n\"While we believe much of this pressure will prove transitory, inflation should remain elevated through early next year, as rising food and services price inflation offsets a moderation in energy and core goods price gains,\" they added.\nThe CPI also serves as another metric pointing to the relative stickiness or transience of inflationary pressures in the recovering economy. Its outsized increases earlier this year — along with increases in the Federal Reserve's preferred inflationary gauge, core personal consumption expenditures — have suggested to some economists that the central bank might be prudent to alter its monetary policies to stave off a sustained overheating of the economy.\nFederal Reserve policymakers, however, have largely stuck to the conviction that inflation will prove transitory in this economy. Central bank officials like Fed Chair Jerome Powell further suggested that a premature policy move could actually backfire by cutting short the recovery in the labor market.\n\"The spike in inflation is so far largely the product of a relatively narrow group of goods and services that have been directly affected by the pandemic and the reopening of the economy,\" Powell said during his speech at the central bank's Jackson Hole symposium in late August.\n\"Some prices — for example, for hotel rooms and airplane tickets — declined sharply during the recession and have now moved back up close to pre-pandemic levels,\" he said. \"The 12-month window we use in computing inflation now captures the rebound in prices but not the initial decline, temporarily elevating reported inflation. These effects, which are adding a few tenths to measured inflation, should wash out over time.\"\nRetail sales\nAnother closely watched economic data report out this week will be Thursday's retail sales print from the U.S. Commerce Department.\nConsumer spending has retreated in recent months as a boost from stimulus checks and other government support faded compared to earlier this year. In July, retail sales fell by a worse-than-expected 1.1%, which was more than three times greater than the drop expected.\nThe August retail sales report will capture more of the impact on spending from the latest jump in coronavirus cases, with infections related to the Delta variant's spread having picked up mid-summer. Consensus economists expect to see sales fall for a back-to-back month, dropping by 0.8% for the month.\nSome service-related spending already slowed in July, suggesting consumers were already going out somewhat less frequently as infections mounted. Food services and drinking places sales increase by 1.7% in July, following a 2.4% monthly gain in June.\nThe August retail sales report, however, will not capture any impact on spending related to the national expiration of enhanced unemployment benefits. Throughout the summer, about half of U.S. states had ended pandemic-era federal jobless benefits to try and incentivize unemployed individuals to return to work. The other half of states ended these benefits by Sept. 6.\nFuture retail sales reports for September and onward may reflect slowing sales as a result of the expiration of this aid, some economists suggested.\n\"Spending by the unemployed, especially low-income households, has been supported by enhanced unemployment benefits,\" Rubeela Farooqi, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in a note. \"Absent this support, spending outcomes will surely be different, especially if households are less secure about job prospects going forward.\"\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Monthly budget statement, August (-$302.1 billion during prior month)\nTuesday: NFIB Small Business Optimism, August (99.7 during prior month); Real Average Weekly Earnings, year-over-year, August (-0.9% during prior month); Consumer Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.4% expected, 0.5% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Consumer Price Index, year-over-year, August (5.3% expected, 5.4% in July); Consumer Price Index excluding food and energy, year-over-year (August (4.2% expected, 4.3% in August)\nWednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended September 10 (-1.9% during prior week); Empire Manufacturing, September (20.0 expected, 18.3 during prior month); Import Price Index, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); Industrial Production, month-over-month, August (0.6% expected, 0.9% in July); Capacity Utilization, August (76.4% in August, 76.1% in July); Manufacturing Production, August (0.4% expected, 1.4% in July)\nThursday: Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, August (-0.8% expected, -1.1% in July); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, August (-0.5% expected, -0.7% in July); Initial jobless claims, week ended September 11; Continuing Claims, week ended September 4; Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, September (20.0 expected, 19.4 in August); Business inventories, July (0.5% expected, 0.8% in June); Total Net TIC Flows, July ($31.5 billion in June); Total Long-term TIC Flows, July ($110.9 billion in June)\nFriday: University of Michigan Sentiment, September preliminary (72.7 expected, 70.3 in August)\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: Oracle (ORCL) after market close\nTuesday: Lennar (LEN), FuelCell Energy (FCEL) before market open  \nWednesday: Weber (WEBR) before market open\nThursday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FCEL":0.9,"LEN":0.9,"ORCL":0.9,"WEBR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":246,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":813871634,"gmtCreate":1630193393628,"gmtModify":1704956780389,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813871634","repostId":"1184130616","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1184130616","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630111537,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1184130616?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-28 08:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Bernard Ebbers And WorldCom's Seriously Wrong Numbers","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184130616","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Does crime pay?\nAmong the mightiest of the high-profile corporate executives that dominated the head","content":"<p><i>Does crime pay?</i></p>\n<p>Among the mightiest of the high-profile corporate executives that dominated the headlines in the 1990s and early 2000s,<b>Bernard Ebbers</b>physically stood out from his peers — the 6-foot-4 head of WorldCom was dubbed the “telecom cowboy” thanks to his sartorial preference for jeans, cowboy boots and a 10-gallon hat.</p>\n<p>Ebbers also stood out from his peers for tightly holding on to Luddite practices as the digital age dawned. He famously refused to communicate with his workforce via email. Even worse, he stood out thanks to a prickly personality that quickly seethed when confronted with unpleasant news. A 2002 profile in The Economist defined him as “parochial, stubborn, preoccupied with penny-pinching … a difficult man to work for.”</p>\n<p><b>But ultimately, Ebbers stood out for being at the center of what was (at the time) the largest accounting fraud in U.S. history, which was followed by the harshest prison sentence ever imposed on a corporate executive for financial crimes.</b></p>\n<p><b>A Man In Search Of Himself:</b>&nbsp;Bernard John Ebbers was born Aug. 27, 1941, in Edmonton, Alberta, the second of five children. His father John was a traveling salesman and his peripatetic profession brought the family down from Canada into California, where he jettisoned his sales work and became an auto mechanic. The family later relocated to Gallup, New Mexico, where Ebbers’ parents became teachers on the Navajo Nation Indian reservation.</p>\n<p>The Ebbers clan was back in Canada when Ebbers was a teenager and Bernie (as he was commonly known) came into adulthood unable to determine a course for his life. He&nbsp;attended Canada’s University of Alberta and Michigan’s Calvin College before accepting a basketball scholarship to Mississippi College. But he was the victim of a robbery prior to his senior year that left him seriously injured and switched his attention from playing to coaching the junior varsity team.</p>\n<p>Ebbers graduated in 1967 majoring in physical education and minoring in secondary education. He supported himself during his college years by taking on a variety of odd jobs including a bouncer and milk delivery driver. He married his college sweetheart,<b>Linda Pigott,</b>after graduating and landed work teaching science to middle-school students while coaching high school basketball.</p>\n<p>But Ebbers didn’t stay very long in the school system. When his wife received a job offer as a teacher in another Mississippi town, the couple relocated and he found work managing a garment factory warehouse. By 1974, he tired of working for others and responded to a newspaper advertisement seeking a buyer for a motel in Columbia, Mississippi.</p>\n<p>Ebbers’ approach to running a hospitality establishment sometimes bordered on the eccentric.&nbsp;He would distribute bathroom towels at the front desk and require guests to return them to avoid being charged for taking them. Nonetheless, he found a niche in hospitality management and by the early 1980s he owned and operated eight motels within Mississippi and Texas; he also picked up a car dealership that also proved profitable.</p>\n<p><b>Calling Out Around The World:</b>Ebbers might have remained in the Mississippi hospitality industry had it not been for the 1982 breakup of<b>AT&amp;T Inc.'s</b>&nbsp;T 0.41%monopoly on the U.S. telephone system. This created a seismic shift in the telecommunications world by enabling other companies to begin reselling long-distance telephone services.</p>\n<p>In 1983, Ebbers and three friends met at a diner in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, to consider the feasibility of pursuing this newly opened opportunity. Ebbers theorized that having control of his long-distance calling services could benefit his motel business. In the days before mobile phones, guests in lodging establishments in need of long-distance calling would either have to feed handfuls of quarters into payphones or make calls from their rooms, which usually came with extra fees.</p>\n<p>Ebbers and his pals decided to get into the telecommunications business with&nbsp;<b>Long Distance Discount Services,</b>&nbsp;which they established in 1985 with headquarters in Jackson, Mississippi, with Ebbers as CEO.</p>\n<p><b>Carl J. Aycock,</b>a Mississippi financial advisor who was among the early investors in LDDS, would later laugh at the unlikelihood of Ebbers running a telecom company.</p>\n<p>“The only experience Bernie had before operating a long-distance company was he used the phone,” Aycock quipped in a 1997 interview.</p>\n<p>Maybe Ebbers did not possess an encyclopedic knowledge of telecommunications technology, but the good fortune he enjoyed in the motel business transitioned to this unlikely setting. Within four years of its launch, LDDS was being publicly traded.</p>\n<p>Within 10 years of its opening, LDDS took on an almost Pac Man-style persona of gobbling up telecom firms in&nbsp;sight of the company, acquiring more than 60 different telecommunications company. By 1995, the company renamed itself LDDS WorldCom.</p>\n<p>Many of the company’s acquisitions were on the small side, and the company was never considered a major player in the telecom industry until its $720 million acquisition of&nbsp;<b>Advanced Telecommunications Corporation</b>&nbsp;in 1992.</p>\n<p>The unlikely acquisition came with Ebbers’ ability to outbid industry titans AT&amp;T and&nbsp;<b>Sprint Corporation,</b>both considerably larger players in this field.</p>\n<p>The one unfortunate development during this time was the end of Ebbers’ marriage in 1997. He remarried in 1999 to&nbsp;<b>Kristie Webb.</b></p>\n<p>In February 1998, Ebbers’ company launched its acquisition plans for&nbsp;<b>CompuServe</b>&nbsp;from&nbsp;<b>H&amp;R Block Inc</b>.</p>\n<p>This transaction was followed by an astonishing spin of assets: LDDS sold the CompuServe Information Service portion of its acquisition to<b>America Online,</b>while retaining the CompuServe Network Services portion of the business. AOL simultaneously sold LDDS WorldCom its networking division, Advanced Network Services.</p>\n<p>In September 1998, LDDS WorldCom sealed a $37 billion union with&nbsp;<b>MCI Communications,</b>which created the largest corporate merger in U.S. history. The combined entity became MCI WorldCom, and for Ebbers it seemed that the sky was the limit —&nbsp;except that Ebbers’ ability to soar in the corporate skies resulted in an Icarus-worthy predicament.</p>\n<p><b>A Little Out Of Touch:</b>One year after the CompuServe and MCI deals, Ebbers’ company boasted an 80,000-person workforce, a market capitalization of roughly $185 billion and its shares were trading at a peak of nearly $62.</p>\n<p>At the peak of the company’s success, Ebbers granted an interview to The New York Times aboard his 130-yacht, which he berthed in the resort town of Hilton Head, South Carolina. He claimed that the secret of his success was “not as complicated as people make it out to be,” adding that he surrounded himself with experts who advised him on which moves to make.</p>\n<p>“I’m not an engineer by training,” he said. “I’m not an accountant by training. I’m the coach. I’m not the point guard who shoots the ball.”</p>\n<p>But as the company grew larger, Ebbers penny-pinching behavior during his early motel management days became more extreme. WorldCom executives would later complain that Ebbers stopped providing free coffee within their offices and directed security guards fill the water coolers with tap water.</p>\n<p>And for the head of a telecommunications company, Ebbers was curiously distrustful of cutting-edge tech developments. He refused to communicate via email and would not carry a pager or a cell phone. He would explain his actions internally by repeating “That’s the way we did it at LDDS,” and in a 1997 Business Week interview about this behavior he claimed that “when you come to the table with a (physical education) degree like I do, you don't know a lot about the technical stuff.”</p>\n<p>While Ebbers’ arms-length distance from personal technology could have been attributed to a zany quirk, there was another problem that couldn’t be happily shrugged away. As the company expanded, operational problems began to permeate the multiple divisions. Ebbers would become impatient or worse when confronted with problems, to the point that he would angrily demand that he only wanted to be addressed with good news.</p>\n<p><b>In retrospect, Ebbers’ refusal to acknowledge that his company was growing too fast and too large proved to be a fatal flaw</b>, especially when the corporate culture began to manufacture good news in lieu of reporting problems. As a result, Ebbers’ XL-sized business empire was sustained by taking on massive amounts of debt and highly improper accounting.</p>\n<p><b>Detour Off The Cliff:</b>The first cracks in this corporate story began in October 1999 when MCI WorldCom —&nbsp;which had become the second-largest long-distance telephone company in the country —&nbsp;announced a $129 billion merger with Sprint, the third-largest telecom carrier. Within nine months of this announcement, the merger was canceled in the face of pressure from U.S. and European regulators who feared a telecom monopoly would be born from this union. MCI WorldCom walked away from the failure by renaming itself as WorldCom.</p>\n<p>With the rise of the new millennium came the fall of the dot-com industry, and almost any company that had a tech-related aspect found itself taking a financial tumble. When Ebbers’ company tried to cut corners and save money, it turned into an act of self-immolation.</p>\n<p>Worldcom’s network systems engineering division exhausted its annual capital expenditures budget by November 2000, with a&nbsp;senior manager ordering&nbsp;a halt to processing payments for network systems vendors and suppliers until the beginning of 2001.</p>\n<p>The company’s chief technical officer,<b>Fred Briggs,</b>then ordered all of the labor associated with the capital projects in the network systems division to be booked as an expense rather than a capital project —&nbsp;and his directive was shared with other divisions in the company.</p>\n<p>A WorldCom budget analyst named&nbsp;<b>Kim Amigh</b>in the company’s Richardson, Texas, office recognized the legal ramifications of intentionally mischaracterizing capital expenses and lodged a protest against the order. The directive was canceled and so was Amigh —&nbsp;three months after his action, Amigh was abruptly laid off from the company.</p>\n<p>But Vice President of Internal Audit&nbsp;<b>Cynthia Cooper</b>&nbsp;learned of Amigh’s findings and picked up his trail. Her department began combing through WorldCom’s accounts and found $2 billion that the company claimed in its public filings was spent on capital expenditures during the first three quarters of 2001 —&nbsp;except that the funds were never authorized for that purpose and were clearly operating costs moved into the capital expenditure accounting as a way to make WorldCom look more profitable.</p>\n<p>Cooper could not find anyone in the WorldCom leadership ranks to explain the $2 billion discrepancy. Most executives said it was a “prepaid capacity,” a meaningless term which they couldn’t define when pressed by Cooper.</p>\n<p>And Cooper was not alone in her suspicions. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission could not fathom how WorldCom continued to claim robust profits during the dot-com period while its competitors were operating at a loss, and it sent forth a “Request for Information” to learn the secret of its success.</p>\n<p>Adding to this chaos were Ebbers’ personal financial woes, which became exacerbated during to dot-com crisis by margin calls on his WorldCom shares, which were tanking as the economy plummeted into a recession.</p>\n<p>To alleviate his monetary pain, Ebbers borrowed $50 million from WorldCom in September 2000&nbsp;— and then borrowed again&nbsp;and again. By April 2002, Ebbers was $400 million in debt to WorldCom and the board of directors demanded his resignation, which he provided.</p>\n<p>In June 2002, WorldCom acknowledged its earnings reports contained $3.9 billion in accounting misstatements, with the figure&nbsp;later adjusted to $11 billion. In July 2002, the company declared bankruptcy and was delisted from public trading. Also during that month, Ebbers was called before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services to explain what happened. He pleaded the Fifth Amendment.</p>\n<p><b>Road’s End:</b>The efforts to bring Ebbers to trial got off to a weird start when the State of Oklahoma jumped the gun with a 15-count indictment, only to drop its charges in favor of federal prosecution.</p>\n<p>Ebbers was indicted in May 2004 on seven counts of filing false statements with securities regulators plus one count each of conspiracy and securities fraud. Ebbers agreed to testify on his behalf, which many observers later considered to be a major mistake because he came across as evasive and unconvincing when insisting WorldCom’s downfall was solely the fault of his subordinates and that he was ignorant about how his company worked.</p>\n<p>“I know what I don’t know,” Ebbers said during his trial. “To this day, I don’t know technology, and I don’t know finance or accounting.”</p>\n<p>Ebbers was found guilty on all counts and was sentenced to 25 years in prison, the longest sentence ever handed down in U.S. history for a financial fraud case against a corporate executive.</p>\n<p>He remained free on bail while fighting to overturn the verdict, but the conviction was upheld in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in July 2006. Two months later, he drove himself in his luxury Mercedes-Benz to a low-security Louisiana prison to begin his sentence. Two years later, his wife Kristie successfully filed for divorce.</p>\n<p>After 13 years behind bars, Ebbers was granted a compassionate release on Dec. 21, 2019, due to a deteriorating state of health that included macular degeneration that left him legally blind, anemia, a weakened heart condition and the beginnings of dementia. He returned to his home in Brookhaven, Mississippi, and passed away on Feb. 2, 2020.</p>\n<p>In defining his rise to the top, Ebbers harkened back to his basketball days by insisting, “The coach's job is to get the best players and get them to play together.” But in explaining his fall from grace, Ebbers forgot that the core of coaching is accepting responsibility for the team’s performance and he blamed his “best players” for not being able to “play together” while absolving himself from their errors.</p>\n<p>Said Ebbers when confronted with his ultimate failure as the corporate equivalent of a coach: “I didn't have anything to apologize for.”</p>\n<p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Bernard Ebbers And WorldCom's Seriously Wrong Numbers</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Crime And Punishment: Bernard Ebbers And WorldCom's Seriously Wrong Numbers\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-28 08:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/08/22680432/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-bernard-ebbers-and-worldcoms-seriously-wrong-numbers><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Does crime pay?\nAmong the mightiest of the high-profile corporate executives that dominated the headlines in the 1990s and early 2000s,Bernard Ebbersphysically stood out from his peers — the 6-foot-4 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/08/22680432/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-bernard-ebbers-and-worldcoms-seriously-wrong-numbers\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HRB":"H&R布洛克税务"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/08/22680432/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-bernard-ebbers-and-worldcoms-seriously-wrong-numbers","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184130616","content_text":"Does crime pay?\nAmong the mightiest of the high-profile corporate executives that dominated the headlines in the 1990s and early 2000s,Bernard Ebbersphysically stood out from his peers — the 6-foot-4 head of WorldCom was dubbed the “telecom cowboy” thanks to his sartorial preference for jeans, cowboy boots and a 10-gallon hat.\nEbbers also stood out from his peers for tightly holding on to Luddite practices as the digital age dawned. He famously refused to communicate with his workforce via email. Even worse, he stood out thanks to a prickly personality that quickly seethed when confronted with unpleasant news. A 2002 profile in The Economist defined him as “parochial, stubborn, preoccupied with penny-pinching … a difficult man to work for.”\nBut ultimately, Ebbers stood out for being at the center of what was (at the time) the largest accounting fraud in U.S. history, which was followed by the harshest prison sentence ever imposed on a corporate executive for financial crimes.\nA Man In Search Of Himself: Bernard John Ebbers was born Aug. 27, 1941, in Edmonton, Alberta, the second of five children. His father John was a traveling salesman and his peripatetic profession brought the family down from Canada into California, where he jettisoned his sales work and became an auto mechanic. The family later relocated to Gallup, New Mexico, where Ebbers’ parents became teachers on the Navajo Nation Indian reservation.\nThe Ebbers clan was back in Canada when Ebbers was a teenager and Bernie (as he was commonly known) came into adulthood unable to determine a course for his life. He attended Canada’s University of Alberta and Michigan’s Calvin College before accepting a basketball scholarship to Mississippi College. But he was the victim of a robbery prior to his senior year that left him seriously injured and switched his attention from playing to coaching the junior varsity team.\nEbbers graduated in 1967 majoring in physical education and minoring in secondary education. He supported himself during his college years by taking on a variety of odd jobs including a bouncer and milk delivery driver. He married his college sweetheart,Linda Pigott,after graduating and landed work teaching science to middle-school students while coaching high school basketball.\nBut Ebbers didn’t stay very long in the school system. When his wife received a job offer as a teacher in another Mississippi town, the couple relocated and he found work managing a garment factory warehouse. By 1974, he tired of working for others and responded to a newspaper advertisement seeking a buyer for a motel in Columbia, Mississippi.\nEbbers’ approach to running a hospitality establishment sometimes bordered on the eccentric. He would distribute bathroom towels at the front desk and require guests to return them to avoid being charged for taking them. Nonetheless, he found a niche in hospitality management and by the early 1980s he owned and operated eight motels within Mississippi and Texas; he also picked up a car dealership that also proved profitable.\nCalling Out Around The World:Ebbers might have remained in the Mississippi hospitality industry had it not been for the 1982 breakup ofAT&T Inc.'s T 0.41%monopoly on the U.S. telephone system. This created a seismic shift in the telecommunications world by enabling other companies to begin reselling long-distance telephone services.\nIn 1983, Ebbers and three friends met at a diner in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, to consider the feasibility of pursuing this newly opened opportunity. Ebbers theorized that having control of his long-distance calling services could benefit his motel business. In the days before mobile phones, guests in lodging establishments in need of long-distance calling would either have to feed handfuls of quarters into payphones or make calls from their rooms, which usually came with extra fees.\nEbbers and his pals decided to get into the telecommunications business with Long Distance Discount Services, which they established in 1985 with headquarters in Jackson, Mississippi, with Ebbers as CEO.\nCarl J. Aycock,a Mississippi financial advisor who was among the early investors in LDDS, would later laugh at the unlikelihood of Ebbers running a telecom company.\n“The only experience Bernie had before operating a long-distance company was he used the phone,” Aycock quipped in a 1997 interview.\nMaybe Ebbers did not possess an encyclopedic knowledge of telecommunications technology, but the good fortune he enjoyed in the motel business transitioned to this unlikely setting. Within four years of its launch, LDDS was being publicly traded.\nWithin 10 years of its opening, LDDS took on an almost Pac Man-style persona of gobbling up telecom firms in sight of the company, acquiring more than 60 different telecommunications company. By 1995, the company renamed itself LDDS WorldCom.\nMany of the company’s acquisitions were on the small side, and the company was never considered a major player in the telecom industry until its $720 million acquisition of Advanced Telecommunications Corporation in 1992.\nThe unlikely acquisition came with Ebbers’ ability to outbid industry titans AT&T and Sprint Corporation,both considerably larger players in this field.\nThe one unfortunate development during this time was the end of Ebbers’ marriage in 1997. He remarried in 1999 to Kristie Webb.\nIn February 1998, Ebbers’ company launched its acquisition plans for CompuServe from H&R Block Inc.\nThis transaction was followed by an astonishing spin of assets: LDDS sold the CompuServe Information Service portion of its acquisition toAmerica Online,while retaining the CompuServe Network Services portion of the business. AOL simultaneously sold LDDS WorldCom its networking division, Advanced Network Services.\nIn September 1998, LDDS WorldCom sealed a $37 billion union with MCI Communications,which created the largest corporate merger in U.S. history. The combined entity became MCI WorldCom, and for Ebbers it seemed that the sky was the limit — except that Ebbers’ ability to soar in the corporate skies resulted in an Icarus-worthy predicament.\nA Little Out Of Touch:One year after the CompuServe and MCI deals, Ebbers’ company boasted an 80,000-person workforce, a market capitalization of roughly $185 billion and its shares were trading at a peak of nearly $62.\nAt the peak of the company’s success, Ebbers granted an interview to The New York Times aboard his 130-yacht, which he berthed in the resort town of Hilton Head, South Carolina. He claimed that the secret of his success was “not as complicated as people make it out to be,” adding that he surrounded himself with experts who advised him on which moves to make.\n“I’m not an engineer by training,” he said. “I’m not an accountant by training. I’m the coach. I’m not the point guard who shoots the ball.”\nBut as the company grew larger, Ebbers penny-pinching behavior during his early motel management days became more extreme. WorldCom executives would later complain that Ebbers stopped providing free coffee within their offices and directed security guards fill the water coolers with tap water.\nAnd for the head of a telecommunications company, Ebbers was curiously distrustful of cutting-edge tech developments. He refused to communicate via email and would not carry a pager or a cell phone. He would explain his actions internally by repeating “That’s the way we did it at LDDS,” and in a 1997 Business Week interview about this behavior he claimed that “when you come to the table with a (physical education) degree like I do, you don't know a lot about the technical stuff.”\nWhile Ebbers’ arms-length distance from personal technology could have been attributed to a zany quirk, there was another problem that couldn’t be happily shrugged away. As the company expanded, operational problems began to permeate the multiple divisions. Ebbers would become impatient or worse when confronted with problems, to the point that he would angrily demand that he only wanted to be addressed with good news.\nIn retrospect, Ebbers’ refusal to acknowledge that his company was growing too fast and too large proved to be a fatal flaw, especially when the corporate culture began to manufacture good news in lieu of reporting problems. As a result, Ebbers’ XL-sized business empire was sustained by taking on massive amounts of debt and highly improper accounting.\nDetour Off The Cliff:The first cracks in this corporate story began in October 1999 when MCI WorldCom — which had become the second-largest long-distance telephone company in the country — announced a $129 billion merger with Sprint, the third-largest telecom carrier. Within nine months of this announcement, the merger was canceled in the face of pressure from U.S. and European regulators who feared a telecom monopoly would be born from this union. MCI WorldCom walked away from the failure by renaming itself as WorldCom.\nWith the rise of the new millennium came the fall of the dot-com industry, and almost any company that had a tech-related aspect found itself taking a financial tumble. When Ebbers’ company tried to cut corners and save money, it turned into an act of self-immolation.\nWorldcom’s network systems engineering division exhausted its annual capital expenditures budget by November 2000, with a senior manager ordering a halt to processing payments for network systems vendors and suppliers until the beginning of 2001.\nThe company’s chief technical officer,Fred Briggs,then ordered all of the labor associated with the capital projects in the network systems division to be booked as an expense rather than a capital project — and his directive was shared with other divisions in the company.\nA WorldCom budget analyst named Kim Amighin the company’s Richardson, Texas, office recognized the legal ramifications of intentionally mischaracterizing capital expenses and lodged a protest against the order. The directive was canceled and so was Amigh — three months after his action, Amigh was abruptly laid off from the company.\nBut Vice President of Internal Audit Cynthia Cooper learned of Amigh’s findings and picked up his trail. Her department began combing through WorldCom’s accounts and found $2 billion that the company claimed in its public filings was spent on capital expenditures during the first three quarters of 2001 — except that the funds were never authorized for that purpose and were clearly operating costs moved into the capital expenditure accounting as a way to make WorldCom look more profitable.\nCooper could not find anyone in the WorldCom leadership ranks to explain the $2 billion discrepancy. Most executives said it was a “prepaid capacity,” a meaningless term which they couldn’t define when pressed by Cooper.\nAnd Cooper was not alone in her suspicions. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission could not fathom how WorldCom continued to claim robust profits during the dot-com period while its competitors were operating at a loss, and it sent forth a “Request for Information” to learn the secret of its success.\nAdding to this chaos were Ebbers’ personal financial woes, which became exacerbated during to dot-com crisis by margin calls on his WorldCom shares, which were tanking as the economy plummeted into a recession.\nTo alleviate his monetary pain, Ebbers borrowed $50 million from WorldCom in September 2000 — and then borrowed again and again. By April 2002, Ebbers was $400 million in debt to WorldCom and the board of directors demanded his resignation, which he provided.\nIn June 2002, WorldCom acknowledged its earnings reports contained $3.9 billion in accounting misstatements, with the figure later adjusted to $11 billion. In July 2002, the company declared bankruptcy and was delisted from public trading. Also during that month, Ebbers was called before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services to explain what happened. He pleaded the Fifth Amendment.\nRoad’s End:The efforts to bring Ebbers to trial got off to a weird start when the State of Oklahoma jumped the gun with a 15-count indictment, only to drop its charges in favor of federal prosecution.\nEbbers was indicted in May 2004 on seven counts of filing false statements with securities regulators plus one count each of conspiracy and securities fraud. Ebbers agreed to testify on his behalf, which many observers later considered to be a major mistake because he came across as evasive and unconvincing when insisting WorldCom’s downfall was solely the fault of his subordinates and that he was ignorant about how his company worked.\n“I know what I don’t know,” Ebbers said during his trial. “To this day, I don’t know technology, and I don’t know finance or accounting.”\nEbbers was found guilty on all counts and was sentenced to 25 years in prison, the longest sentence ever handed down in U.S. history for a financial fraud case against a corporate executive.\nHe remained free on bail while fighting to overturn the verdict, but the conviction was upheld in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in July 2006. Two months later, he drove himself in his luxury Mercedes-Benz to a low-security Louisiana prison to begin his sentence. Two years later, his wife Kristie successfully filed for divorce.\nAfter 13 years behind bars, Ebbers was granted a compassionate release on Dec. 21, 2019, due to a deteriorating state of health that included macular degeneration that left him legally blind, anemia, a weakened heart condition and the beginnings of dementia. He returned to his home in Brookhaven, Mississippi, and passed away on Feb. 2, 2020.\nIn defining his rise to the top, Ebbers harkened back to his basketball days by insisting, “The coach's job is to get the best players and get them to play together.” But in explaining his fall from grace, Ebbers forgot that the core of coaching is accepting responsibility for the team’s performance and he blamed his “best players” for not being able to “play together” while absolving himself from their errors.\nSaid Ebbers when confronted with his ultimate failure as the corporate equivalent of a coach: “I didn't have anything to apologize for.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HRB":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":310,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":888236714,"gmtCreate":1631498217038,"gmtModify":1631889509228,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/888236714","repostId":"1144568207","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144568207","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1631497101,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1144568207?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-13 09:38","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144568207","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market.\nA US private equity firm has abandoned a pla","content":"<p>SOHO&nbsp;CHINA&nbsp;shares&nbsp;once&nbsp;tumbled&nbsp;40%&nbsp;in&nbsp;Hong&nbsp;Kong&nbsp;market.</p>\n<p>A US private equity firm has abandoned a planned US$3 billion purchase of Chinese property developer Soho China, with antitrust authorities yet to approve the deal.</p>\n<p>Blackstone had hoped to expand its presence in the country through acquisition of Soho China, which holds prime real estate in cities like Beijing.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-13 09:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SOHO&nbsp;CHINA&nbsp;shares&nbsp;once&nbsp;tumbled&nbsp;40%&nbsp;in&nbsp;Hong&nbsp;Kong&nbsp;market.</p>\n<p>A US private equity firm has abandoned a planned US$3 billion purchase of Chinese property developer Soho China, with antitrust authorities yet to approve the deal.</p>\n<p>Blackstone had hoped to expand its presence in the country through acquisition of Soho China, which holds prime real estate in cities like Beijing.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BX":"黑石","00410":"SOHO中国"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144568207","content_text":"SOHO CHINA shares once tumbled 40% in Hong Kong market.\nA US private equity firm has abandoned a planned US$3 billion purchase of Chinese property developer Soho China, with antitrust authorities yet to approve the deal.\nBlackstone had hoped to expand its presence in the country through acquisition of Soho China, which holds prime real estate in cities like Beijing.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"00410":0.9,"BX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":44,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":872845562,"gmtCreate":1637487959097,"gmtModify":1637487959207,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>good","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872845562","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1128,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":880091430,"gmtCreate":1630995865620,"gmtModify":1631889509280,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880091430","repostId":"1147921064","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147921064","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630992496,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147921064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-07 13:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Microsoft, 11 Other Dividend Growth Stocks To Announce Annual Increases In October","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147921064","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nThings were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Things were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors with a 30% boost, several other companies came in with very small increases.</li>\n <li>These increases were enough to keep those companies’ growth streaks going, in hopes for better earnings growth in the future.</li>\n <li>Microsoft and Accenture should announce double-digit boosts in September. Investors can expect increases from nine other long-term income growth companies.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12d5055e3abb83bb4f168f29e8c9f282\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"541\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Jean-Luc Ichard/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>This is the latest in my series of articles where I provide predictions of annual dividend increases for a variety of long-term dividend growth companies. Back at the end of July, I provided predictions for 16 dividend growth companies that have historically announced annual payout increases in August. In this article I’ll look at 11 more dividend growth companies for September.</p>\n<p>In addition to the companies I reviewed, insurer American Financial Group (AFG) marked its 16th year of dividend growth with a 12% increase. The annual payout of $2.24 gives the company a forward yield of 1.63%.</p>\n<p>Here are the results from the August article (the original predictions are availablehere), followed by my predictions for the dividend increases that I’m expecting to be announced in September:</p>\n<p>(All yields are based on stock prices at the market close on Friday, September 3rd.)</p>\n<p><b>Results for Dividend Increase Announcements from August</b></p>\n<p><b>BancFirst Corporation (BANF) – 28 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 10.3 – 14.7% increase to $1.50 - $1.56</p>\n<p>Actual: 5.9% increase to $1.44</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 2.59%</p>\n<p>This is the Oklahoma-based bank’s 2nd year of 6% dividend growth.</p>\n<p><b>Badger Meter (BMI) – 29 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 9.7 – 13.9% increase to $0.79 - $0.82</p>\n<p>Actual: 11.1% increase to $0.80</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.76%</p>\n<p>The flow meter designer and manufacturer returned to its normal level of dividend growth.</p>\n<p><b>Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) – 15 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 13.0 – 16.5% increase to $2.60 - $2.68</p>\n<p>Actual: 11.3% increase to $2.56</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.50%</p>\n<p>I had hoped that the technology company would reward investors with a larger increase. Nevertheless, it’s another year of double-digit growth for Broadridge.</p>\n<p><b>Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) – 12 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.9 – 19.0% increase to $1.88 - $2.00</p>\n<p>Actual: 14.3% increase to $1.92</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.52%</p>\n<p>The strong stock market is powering strong dividend growth from the operator of options markets.</p>\n<p><b>Carlisle Companies (CSL) – 45 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 10.5 – 14.3% increase to $2.32 - $2.40</p>\n<p>Actual: 2.9% increase to $2.16</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.04%</p>\n<p>Although the company’s earnings grew at double digits in the first half of the year, Carlisle’s latest increase was well below its long-term growth rate.</p>\n<p><b>Dover Corporation (DOV) – 66 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.1 – 16.2% increase to $2.20 - $2.30</p>\n<p>Actual: 1.0% increase to $2.00</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.14%</p>\n<p>Dover kept its dividend streak – one of the longest among all publicly traded companies – going with its 2nd year of 1% increases.</p>\n<p><b>Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) – 54 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 1.9 – 3.8% increase to $4.32 - $4.40</p>\n<p>Actual: 0.9% increase to $4.28</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 3.48%</p>\n<p>The hit to urban real estate from the pandemic impacted Federal Realty, which focuses on regions like Washington, D.C., Boston, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.</p>\n<p><b>International Flavors &amp; Fragrances (IFF) – 19 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 2.6 – 3.9% increase to $3.16 - $3.20</p>\n<p>Actual: 2.6% increase to $3.16</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 2.09%</p>\n<p>This is the 2nd year of 3% dividend growth for the specialty chemical company.</p>\n<p><b>Intuit Inc. (INTU) – 11 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.9 – 15.3% increase to $2.64 - $2.72</p>\n<p>Actual: 15.3% increase to $2.72</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.48%</p>\n<p>The financial software firm continued its history of annual double-digit payout growth.</p>\n<p><b>Illinois Tool Works (ITW) – 47 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.4 – 14.0% increase to $5.08 - $5.20</p>\n<p>Actual: 7.0% increase to $4.88</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 2.14%</p>\n<p>Illinois Tool’s heavy debt load held down the company’s latest dividend increase.</p>\n<p><b>Altria Group (MO) – 52 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 1.7 – 3.5% increase to $3.50 - $3.56</p>\n<p>Actual: 4.7% increase to $3.60</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 7.06%</p>\n<p>Altria’s latest increase is an improvement over last year’s 2.4% boost.</p>\n<p><b>Nordson Corporation (NDSN) – 58 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 10.3 – 15.4% increase to $1.72 - $1.80</p>\n<p>Actual: 30.8% increase to $2.04</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.84%</p>\n<p>Nordson’s 34% EPS growth this year powered a dividend boost that more than made up for last year’s small 3% increase.</p>\n<p><b>Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA) – 21 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 9.1 – 13.6 % increase to $0.96 - $1.00</p>\n<p>Actual: 13.6% increase to $1.00</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.59%</p>\n<p>This is Ritchie Bros.’ 3rd straight year of 10%+ dividend growth.</p>\n<p><b>Steris plc (STE) – 17 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 8.8 – 12.5% increase to $1.74 - $1.80</p>\n<p>Actual: 7.5% increase to $1.72</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 0.79%</p>\n<p>Although Steris’ earnings growth came in at nearly 10%, I overestimated what the healthcare company’s latest increase would be.</p>\n<p><b>Verizon Communications (VZ) – 17 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.2 – 5.2% increase to $2.59 - $2.64</p>\n<p>Actual: 2.0% increase to $2.56</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 4.62%</p>\n<p>Verizon’s latest increase is consistent with its slow growth over the last 5 years.</p>\n<p><b>Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) – 18 years</b></p>\n<p>Prediction: 7.4 – 11.1% increase to $1.16 - $1.20</p>\n<p>Actual: 10.2% increase to $1.19</p>\n<p>Forward yield: 1.37%</p>\n<p>Westlake Chemical’s increase this year beat the company’s 5-year average growth rate of 8%.</p>\n<p><b>Predictions for Dividend Increases in September</b></p>\n<p>Here are my predictions for the 12 dividend increases I expect in September:</p>\n<p><b>Accenture (ACN) – 16 years of dividend growth</b></p>\n<p>Delivering consulting services to its customers, Accenture has grown rapidly over the last decade, compounding its dividend at more than 16% annually. The company’s dividend growth has slowed in recent years, but it still managed a 10% boost in 2020. With no debt, a payout ratio below 40%, and expected adjusted EPS growth this year of 17%, the company is poised for another year of double-digit dividend growth.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 11.4 – 14.8% increase to $3.92 - $4.04</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 1.14 – 1.18%</p>\n<p><b>Brady Corporation (BRC) – 35 years</b></p>\n<p>Despite the resurgence of the COVID delta variant, business is returning to normal for Brady. The company manufactures and markets labeling and identification products. Although earnings per share fell 14% in 2020, the company is projecting a return to good growth in 2021, with EPS growth since 2019 of between 5 and 9%. The question is whether this return to normal growth means a larger payout boost than last year’s 1% increase. Although the company is debt free and has a payout ratio below 40%, the company has historically grown dividends very slowly. I think investors are looking at another small increase.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 2.3 – 4.5% increase to $0.90 - $0.92</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 1.74 – 1.78%</p>\n<p><b>The First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC) – 24 years</b></p>\n<p>The parent company for the First National Bank of Long Island, this regional banking company serves customers on Long Island and in New York City. After growing earnings per share by 3% in 2020, growth accelerated to 14% in the first half of 2021. This is due primarily to improving economic conditions as the pandemic recedes, which allowed the company to reduce the amount held for credit losses. Historically, the company has compounded dividends at 7% over the last decade, although the uncertainty with the resurgence of the virus will make that the most that investors can expect.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.9 – 6.6% increase to $0.79 - $0.81</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.83 – 3.93%</p>\n<p><b>Honeywell International (HON) – 10 years</b></p>\n<p>Industrial machinery company Honeywell, with business in aerospace and defense, and building and industrial control, is seeing renewed growth. The company has expanded margins and increased sales across most of its business lines, and is projecting EPS growth of between 12 and 14% for 2021. This will help the company return to its normal dividend growth of around 10% after last year’s 3% boost.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 9.1 – 11.3% increase to $4.06 - $4.14</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 1.78 – 1.81%</p>\n<p><b>Ingredion (INGR) – 10 years</b></p>\n<p>A drop in EPS last year forced the maker of natural food ingredients to report out a minimal dividend increase of less than 2%, well below the average growth rate of 7% over the last 5 years. The company is expecting earnings growth to return this year, with projections in a wide range between 3 and 10% for 2021. With a projected payout ratio below 50%, investors can expect a return to faster dividend growth.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 4.7 – 6.3% increase to $2.68 - $2.72</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.04 – 3.09%</p>\n<p><b>Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) – 18 years</b></p>\n<p>With sales growth across all four business sectors – Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space – Lockheed Martin produced year-over-year earnings growth in the 1st half of the year. The company has boosted its outlook for the full year and is now expecting EPS growth of 10%. Although the defense contractor has a heavy debt load, this hasn’t kept the company from quickly growing its dividend in the past. Investors should expect a boost around the 5-year growth average of 9.5%.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 8.7 – 11.5% increase to $11.30 - $11.60</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.17 – 3.26%</p>\n<p><b>McDonald’s Corporation (MCD) – 45 years</b></p>\n<p>The story of McDonald’s in 2020 is one of many restaurants during the pandemic. After a 20% drop in EPS in 2020, the company’s business has rebounded in the first half of 2021 as more people get vaccinated and they start to feel more comfortable going out. Before the emergence of the Delta variant, McDonald’s adjusted EPS had more than doubled over the first 6 months of the year. The new variant makes business uncertain for the restaurant chain; this uncertainty makes it less likely that the company will resume historical levels of dividend growth. However, it looks like McDonald’s will be able to reward investors with a larger boost than last year’s 3% increase.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 4.3 – 5.8% increase to $5.38 - $5.46</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 2.25 – 2.29%</p>\n<p><b>Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) – 18 years</b></p>\n<p>Microsoft is firing on all cylinders and still growing quickly, despite a market cap of more than $2 trillion. The company recently reported double-digit revenue growth across all sectors, including MS Office products (up 20%) and Azure (up 50%). This revenue growth powered EPS growth of 40%. With little debt and a payout ratio below 30%, investors in Microsoft can expect a very nice boost this year.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 14.3 – 21.4% increase to $2.56 - $2.72</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 0.85 – 0.90%</p>\n<p><b>New Jersey Resources (NJR) – 25 years</b></p>\n<p>The natural gas utility hits the quarter-century mark of dividend growth this year. New Jersey Resources has done better than expected in the first half of the year, and recently increased its full-year adjusted EPS growth guidance to between 1.4% and 6.3%. This will give NJR room for its annual increase, although investors can expect a boost below the company’s 10-year growth average of 6%.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.8 – 5.3% increase to $1.38 - $1.40</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 3.67 – 3.72%</p>\n<p><b>OGE Energy (OGE) – 14 years</b></p>\n<p>The parent company of Oklahoma Gas &amp; Electric is looking at EPS growth of between 3 and 9% for the full fiscal year. Despite the decent growth for a “boring” utility company, OGE’s payout ratio of nearly 90% limits the company’s dividend growth going forward. Although OGE has a compounded dividend growth rate of 8% over the last decade, investors can expect an announcement of a boost similar to last year’s 4% increase.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 3.1 – 5.0% increase to $1.66 - $1.69</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 4.65 – 4.74%</p>\n<p><b>Philip Morris International (PM) – 13 years</b></p>\n<p>The tobacco company reported 7% adjusted EPS growth in 2020 and is guiding to another 13% growth in 2021. This growth supports the company’s goal of repurchasing up to $7 billion in stock over the next 3 years. It should also support the continuing growth of the company’s dividend despite a payout ratio above 80%. The company has a 5-year growth rate of 3%; investors can expect a boost close to that level.</p>\n<p>Prediction: 2.9 – 4.2% increase to $4.94 - $5.00</p>\n<p>Predicted Forward Yield: 4.66 – 4.71%</p>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<p>August’s group of dividend stocks was a mixed bag – while there were some very nice increases for investors, many of them came in below my expectations. The big winners were investors in Nordson; they’re going to benefit from the company’s 30% boost. However, investors in Dover, Federal Realty, and Carlisle are looking at small increases to their income.</p>\n<p>Despite some disappointments, I am still optimistic about dividend growth through the rest of the year. Microsoft and Accenture should reward investors with double-digit percent increases, while investors in Lockheed Martin and Honeywell can look forward to percentage increases in the high single digits. Investors in utilities New Jersey Resources and OGE can also look forward to small increases.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Microsoft, 11 Other Dividend Growth Stocks To Announce Annual Increases In October</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicrosoft, 11 Other Dividend Growth Stocks To Announce Annual Increases In October\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-07 13:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453667-microsoft-11-other-dividend-growth-stocks-to-announce-annual-increases-in-october><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nThings were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors with a 30% boost, several other companies came in with very small increases.\nThese increases were ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453667-microsoft-11-other-dividend-growth-stocks-to-announce-annual-increases-in-october\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CBOE":"芝加哥期权交易所","BMI":"Badger Meter","MSFT":"微软","INGR":"宜瑞安","BRC":"布雷迪","FRT":"FRT信托","NJR":"新泽西能源","LMT":"洛克希德马丁","HON":"霍尼韦尔","WLK":"Westlake Chemical Corp","ITW":"伊利诺伊机械","PM":"菲利普莫里斯","OGE":"OGE Energy Corp","RBA":"里奇兄弟拍卖","IFF":"国际香料香精","ACN":"埃森哲","DOV":"美国都福集团","CSL":"卡莱尔伙伴","FLIC":"第一长岛","STE":"思泰瑞医疗","MCD":"麦当劳","INTU":"财捷","BR":"Broadridge金融解决方案","MO":"奥驰亚"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453667-microsoft-11-other-dividend-growth-stocks-to-announce-annual-increases-in-october","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147921064","content_text":"Summary\n\nThings were mixed for dividend growth investors in August. While Nordson rewarded investors with a 30% boost, several other companies came in with very small increases.\nThese increases were enough to keep those companies’ growth streaks going, in hopes for better earnings growth in the future.\nMicrosoft and Accenture should announce double-digit boosts in September. Investors can expect increases from nine other long-term income growth companies.\n\nJean-Luc Ichard/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nThis is the latest in my series of articles where I provide predictions of annual dividend increases for a variety of long-term dividend growth companies. Back at the end of July, I provided predictions for 16 dividend growth companies that have historically announced annual payout increases in August. In this article I’ll look at 11 more dividend growth companies for September.\nIn addition to the companies I reviewed, insurer American Financial Group (AFG) marked its 16th year of dividend growth with a 12% increase. The annual payout of $2.24 gives the company a forward yield of 1.63%.\nHere are the results from the August article (the original predictions are availablehere), followed by my predictions for the dividend increases that I’m expecting to be announced in September:\n(All yields are based on stock prices at the market close on Friday, September 3rd.)\nResults for Dividend Increase Announcements from August\nBancFirst Corporation (BANF) – 28 years\nPrediction: 10.3 – 14.7% increase to $1.50 - $1.56\nActual: 5.9% increase to $1.44\nForward yield: 2.59%\nThis is the Oklahoma-based bank’s 2nd year of 6% dividend growth.\nBadger Meter (BMI) – 29 years\nPrediction: 9.7 – 13.9% increase to $0.79 - $0.82\nActual: 11.1% increase to $0.80\nForward yield: 0.76%\nThe flow meter designer and manufacturer returned to its normal level of dividend growth.\nBroadridge Financial Solutions (BR) – 15 years\nPrediction: 13.0 – 16.5% increase to $2.60 - $2.68\nActual: 11.3% increase to $2.56\nForward yield: 1.50%\nI had hoped that the technology company would reward investors with a larger increase. Nevertheless, it’s another year of double-digit growth for Broadridge.\nCboe Global Markets (CBOE) – 12 years\nPrediction: 11.9 – 19.0% increase to $1.88 - $2.00\nActual: 14.3% increase to $1.92\nForward yield: 1.52%\nThe strong stock market is powering strong dividend growth from the operator of options markets.\nCarlisle Companies (CSL) – 45 years\nPrediction: 10.5 – 14.3% increase to $2.32 - $2.40\nActual: 2.9% increase to $2.16\nForward yield: 1.04%\nAlthough the company’s earnings grew at double digits in the first half of the year, Carlisle’s latest increase was well below its long-term growth rate.\nDover Corporation (DOV) – 66 years\nPrediction: 11.1 – 16.2% increase to $2.20 - $2.30\nActual: 1.0% increase to $2.00\nForward yield: 1.14%\nDover kept its dividend streak – one of the longest among all publicly traded companies – going with its 2nd year of 1% increases.\nFederal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) – 54 years\nPrediction: 1.9 – 3.8% increase to $4.32 - $4.40\nActual: 0.9% increase to $4.28\nForward yield: 3.48%\nThe hit to urban real estate from the pandemic impacted Federal Realty, which focuses on regions like Washington, D.C., Boston, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.\nInternational Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) – 19 years\nPrediction: 2.6 – 3.9% increase to $3.16 - $3.20\nActual: 2.6% increase to $3.16\nForward yield: 2.09%\nThis is the 2nd year of 3% dividend growth for the specialty chemical company.\nIntuit Inc. (INTU) – 11 years\nPrediction: 11.9 – 15.3% increase to $2.64 - $2.72\nActual: 15.3% increase to $2.72\nForward yield: 0.48%\nThe financial software firm continued its history of annual double-digit payout growth.\nIllinois Tool Works (ITW) – 47 years\nPrediction: 11.4 – 14.0% increase to $5.08 - $5.20\nActual: 7.0% increase to $4.88\nForward yield: 2.14%\nIllinois Tool’s heavy debt load held down the company’s latest dividend increase.\nAltria Group (MO) – 52 years\nPrediction: 1.7 – 3.5% increase to $3.50 - $3.56\nActual: 4.7% increase to $3.60\nForward yield: 7.06%\nAltria’s latest increase is an improvement over last year’s 2.4% boost.\nNordson Corporation (NDSN) – 58 years\nPrediction: 10.3 – 15.4% increase to $1.72 - $1.80\nActual: 30.8% increase to $2.04\nForward yield: 0.84%\nNordson’s 34% EPS growth this year powered a dividend boost that more than made up for last year’s small 3% increase.\nRitchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA) – 21 years\nPrediction: 9.1 – 13.6 % increase to $0.96 - $1.00\nActual: 13.6% increase to $1.00\nForward yield: 1.59%\nThis is Ritchie Bros.’ 3rd straight year of 10%+ dividend growth.\nSteris plc (STE) – 17 years\nPrediction: 8.8 – 12.5% increase to $1.74 - $1.80\nActual: 7.5% increase to $1.72\nForward yield: 0.79%\nAlthough Steris’ earnings growth came in at nearly 10%, I overestimated what the healthcare company’s latest increase would be.\nVerizon Communications (VZ) – 17 years\nPrediction: 3.2 – 5.2% increase to $2.59 - $2.64\nActual: 2.0% increase to $2.56\nForward yield: 4.62%\nVerizon’s latest increase is consistent with its slow growth over the last 5 years.\nWestlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) – 18 years\nPrediction: 7.4 – 11.1% increase to $1.16 - $1.20\nActual: 10.2% increase to $1.19\nForward yield: 1.37%\nWestlake Chemical’s increase this year beat the company’s 5-year average growth rate of 8%.\nPredictions for Dividend Increases in September\nHere are my predictions for the 12 dividend increases I expect in September:\nAccenture (ACN) – 16 years of dividend growth\nDelivering consulting services to its customers, Accenture has grown rapidly over the last decade, compounding its dividend at more than 16% annually. The company’s dividend growth has slowed in recent years, but it still managed a 10% boost in 2020. With no debt, a payout ratio below 40%, and expected adjusted EPS growth this year of 17%, the company is poised for another year of double-digit dividend growth.\nPrediction: 11.4 – 14.8% increase to $3.92 - $4.04\nPredicted Forward Yield: 1.14 – 1.18%\nBrady Corporation (BRC) – 35 years\nDespite the resurgence of the COVID delta variant, business is returning to normal for Brady. The company manufactures and markets labeling and identification products. Although earnings per share fell 14% in 2020, the company is projecting a return to good growth in 2021, with EPS growth since 2019 of between 5 and 9%. The question is whether this return to normal growth means a larger payout boost than last year’s 1% increase. Although the company is debt free and has a payout ratio below 40%, the company has historically grown dividends very slowly. I think investors are looking at another small increase.\nPrediction: 2.3 – 4.5% increase to $0.90 - $0.92\nPredicted Forward Yield: 1.74 – 1.78%\nThe First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC) – 24 years\nThe parent company for the First National Bank of Long Island, this regional banking company serves customers on Long Island and in New York City. After growing earnings per share by 3% in 2020, growth accelerated to 14% in the first half of 2021. This is due primarily to improving economic conditions as the pandemic recedes, which allowed the company to reduce the amount held for credit losses. Historically, the company has compounded dividends at 7% over the last decade, although the uncertainty with the resurgence of the virus will make that the most that investors can expect.\nPrediction: 3.9 – 6.6% increase to $0.79 - $0.81\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.83 – 3.93%\nHoneywell International (HON) – 10 years\nIndustrial machinery company Honeywell, with business in aerospace and defense, and building and industrial control, is seeing renewed growth. The company has expanded margins and increased sales across most of its business lines, and is projecting EPS growth of between 12 and 14% for 2021. This will help the company return to its normal dividend growth of around 10% after last year’s 3% boost.\nPrediction: 9.1 – 11.3% increase to $4.06 - $4.14\nPredicted Forward Yield: 1.78 – 1.81%\nIngredion (INGR) – 10 years\nA drop in EPS last year forced the maker of natural food ingredients to report out a minimal dividend increase of less than 2%, well below the average growth rate of 7% over the last 5 years. The company is expecting earnings growth to return this year, with projections in a wide range between 3 and 10% for 2021. With a projected payout ratio below 50%, investors can expect a return to faster dividend growth.\nPrediction: 4.7 – 6.3% increase to $2.68 - $2.72\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.04 – 3.09%\nLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) – 18 years\nWith sales growth across all four business sectors – Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space – Lockheed Martin produced year-over-year earnings growth in the 1st half of the year. The company has boosted its outlook for the full year and is now expecting EPS growth of 10%. Although the defense contractor has a heavy debt load, this hasn’t kept the company from quickly growing its dividend in the past. Investors should expect a boost around the 5-year growth average of 9.5%.\nPrediction: 8.7 – 11.5% increase to $11.30 - $11.60\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.17 – 3.26%\nMcDonald’s Corporation (MCD) – 45 years\nThe story of McDonald’s in 2020 is one of many restaurants during the pandemic. After a 20% drop in EPS in 2020, the company’s business has rebounded in the first half of 2021 as more people get vaccinated and they start to feel more comfortable going out. Before the emergence of the Delta variant, McDonald’s adjusted EPS had more than doubled over the first 6 months of the year. The new variant makes business uncertain for the restaurant chain; this uncertainty makes it less likely that the company will resume historical levels of dividend growth. However, it looks like McDonald’s will be able to reward investors with a larger boost than last year’s 3% increase.\nPrediction: 4.3 – 5.8% increase to $5.38 - $5.46\nPredicted Forward Yield: 2.25 – 2.29%\nMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT) – 18 years\nMicrosoft is firing on all cylinders and still growing quickly, despite a market cap of more than $2 trillion. The company recently reported double-digit revenue growth across all sectors, including MS Office products (up 20%) and Azure (up 50%). This revenue growth powered EPS growth of 40%. With little debt and a payout ratio below 30%, investors in Microsoft can expect a very nice boost this year.\nPrediction: 14.3 – 21.4% increase to $2.56 - $2.72\nPredicted Forward Yield: 0.85 – 0.90%\nNew Jersey Resources (NJR) – 25 years\nThe natural gas utility hits the quarter-century mark of dividend growth this year. New Jersey Resources has done better than expected in the first half of the year, and recently increased its full-year adjusted EPS growth guidance to between 1.4% and 6.3%. This will give NJR room for its annual increase, although investors can expect a boost below the company’s 10-year growth average of 6%.\nPrediction: 3.8 – 5.3% increase to $1.38 - $1.40\nPredicted Forward Yield: 3.67 – 3.72%\nOGE Energy (OGE) – 14 years\nThe parent company of Oklahoma Gas & Electric is looking at EPS growth of between 3 and 9% for the full fiscal year. Despite the decent growth for a “boring” utility company, OGE’s payout ratio of nearly 90% limits the company’s dividend growth going forward. Although OGE has a compounded dividend growth rate of 8% over the last decade, investors can expect an announcement of a boost similar to last year’s 4% increase.\nPrediction: 3.1 – 5.0% increase to $1.66 - $1.69\nPredicted Forward Yield: 4.65 – 4.74%\nPhilip Morris International (PM) – 13 years\nThe tobacco company reported 7% adjusted EPS growth in 2020 and is guiding to another 13% growth in 2021. This growth supports the company’s goal of repurchasing up to $7 billion in stock over the next 3 years. It should also support the continuing growth of the company’s dividend despite a payout ratio above 80%. The company has a 5-year growth rate of 3%; investors can expect a boost close to that level.\nPrediction: 2.9 – 4.2% increase to $4.94 - $5.00\nPredicted Forward Yield: 4.66 – 4.71%\nSummary\nAugust’s group of dividend stocks was a mixed bag – while there were some very nice increases for investors, many of them came in below my expectations. The big winners were investors in Nordson; they’re going to benefit from the company’s 30% boost. However, investors in Dover, Federal Realty, and Carlisle are looking at small increases to their income.\nDespite some disappointments, I am still optimistic about dividend growth through the rest of the year. Microsoft and Accenture should reward investors with double-digit percent increases, while investors in Lockheed Martin and Honeywell can look forward to percentage increases in the high single digits. Investors in utilities New Jersey Resources and OGE can also look forward to small increases.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ACN":0.9,"BMI":0.9,"BR":0.9,"BRC":0.9,"CBOE":0.9,"CSL":0.9,"DOV":0.9,"FLIC":0.9,"FRT":0.9,"HON":0.9,"IFF":0.9,"INGR":0.9,"INTU":0.9,"ITW":0.9,"LMT":0.9,"MCD":0.9,"MO":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"NJR":0.9,"OGE":0.9,"PM":0.9,"RBA":0.9,"STE":0.9,"WLK":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":209,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818785013,"gmtCreate":1630450452032,"gmtModify":1631889509329,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/818785013","repostId":"1145804281","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145804281","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630420947,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145804281?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-31 22:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Top India Carmaker Says Output to Drop 40% on Chip Crisis","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145804281","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge nex","content":"<p>Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge next month as the semiconductor shortage hits production.</p>\n<p>Total volume could be about 40% of normal output in September, the company said in an exchange filing Tuesday.</p>\n<p>“Owing to a supply constraint of electronic components due to the semiconductor shortage situation, the company is expecting an adverse impact on vehicle production,” it said, adding that its factory in Haryana and contract-manufacturing partner Suzuki Motor Gujarat Pvt. will both be impacted.</p>\n<p>India’s automobile industry, which was reeling from its worst-ever slowdown, was hit again by waves of Covid-19 infections, which shuttered factories and dealerships. In addition, the global semiconductor shortage has crippled production and climbing commodity prices has raised input costs.</p>\n<p>Maruti is expecting the global semiconductor crunch tolast for about a year&nbsp;and is adjusting production to match chip supply, Shashank Srivastava, executive director for marketing and sales, said last month.</p>\n<p>Suzuki Motor Corp.earlier this month&nbsp;warned&nbsp;the global chip shortage will affect it through March. Masahiko Nagao, Suzuki’s senior managing director, said the company is working with suppliers on procurement and will address the issue “speedily.” The carmaker has started talks with suppliers about longer-term contracts, he said.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Top India Carmaker Says Output to Drop 40% on Chip Crisis</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTop India Carmaker Says Output to Drop 40% on Chip Crisis\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-31 22:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/top-india-carmaker-says-output-to-drop-40-on-chip-crisis><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge next month as the semiconductor shortage hits production.\nTotal volume could be about 40% of normal ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/top-india-carmaker-says-output-to-drop-40-on-chip-crisis\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SZKMF":"Suzuki Motor Co."},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-31/top-india-carmaker-says-output-to-drop-40-on-chip-crisis","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145804281","content_text":"Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the country’s largest carmaker by deliveries, expects output to plunge next month as the semiconductor shortage hits production.\nTotal volume could be about 40% of normal output in September, the company said in an exchange filing Tuesday.\n“Owing to a supply constraint of electronic components due to the semiconductor shortage situation, the company is expecting an adverse impact on vehicle production,” it said, adding that its factory in Haryana and contract-manufacturing partner Suzuki Motor Gujarat Pvt. will both be impacted.\nIndia’s automobile industry, which was reeling from its worst-ever slowdown, was hit again by waves of Covid-19 infections, which shuttered factories and dealerships. In addition, the global semiconductor shortage has crippled production and climbing commodity prices has raised input costs.\nMaruti is expecting the global semiconductor crunch tolast for about a year and is adjusting production to match chip supply, Shashank Srivastava, executive director for marketing and sales, said last month.\nSuzuki Motor Corp.earlier this month warned the global chip shortage will affect it through March. Masahiko Nagao, Suzuki’s senior managing director, said the company is working with suppliers on procurement and will address the issue “speedily.” The carmaker has started talks with suppliers about longer-term contracts, he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SZKMF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":325,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":826626554,"gmtCreate":1634015664434,"gmtModify":1634015724948,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/826626554","repostId":"2174854361","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2174854361","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1633992660,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2174854361?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-12 06:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St ends choppy session lower on earnings jitters; financials down","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2174854361","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, Oct 11  - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.Supply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase & Co  results on Wednesday.Indexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&P 500 along with Amazon.com. , whic","content":"<p>NEW YORK, Oct 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.</p>\n<p>Supply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co&nbsp; results on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Indexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500 along with Amazon.com</p>\n<p>, which fell 1.3%. The S&amp;P financial index&nbsp;was down 1%, while communication services&nbsp;dropped 1.5%.</p>\n<p>\"The market is a bit cautious going into this earnings season,\" said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment strategist at Inverness Counsel in New York. \"Supply chain issues may have impacted earnings for a number of companies and certain industries more than others.\"</p>\n<p>While another period of strong U.S. profit growth is forecast for Corporate America, earnings are shaping up to be crucial for investors worried about how supply disruptions and inflation pressures will affect bottom lines.</p>\n<p>That could lead to more volatility on Wall Street following a bruising September. Analysts expect a 29.6% year-over-year increase in profit for S&amp;P 500 companies in the third quarter, according to IBES data from Refinitiv as of Friday.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 250.19 points, or 0.72%, to 34,496.06, the S&amp;P 500 lost 30.15 points, or 0.69%, to 4,361.19 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 93.34 points, or 0.64%, to 14,486.20.</p>\n<p>The energy sector&nbsp;also ended lower after hitting its highest since January 2020 earlier in the day. Higher oil prices have fed into concerns about rising costs for businesses and consumers.</p>\n<p>Analysts do expect some positive earnings news. \"If you're a larger company, you're able to mitigate a lot of these issues,\" said Christopher Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities in New York.</p>\n<p>Managements \"have been very cognizant of their budgets and not sacrificing margins.\" Plus, demand remains strong, he said.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> Inc.&nbsp;was down 2.2% and Mastercard Inc&nbsp;also fell 2.2% among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.15 billion shares, compared with the 10.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Trading may have been slower due to the U.S. federal holiday Monday, with U.S. bond markets shut for the day.</p>\n<p>Among individual stocks, Southwest Airlines Co fell 4.2% on a report that it canceled at least 30% of scheduled flights on Sunday.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St ends choppy session lower on earnings jitters; financials down</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St ends choppy session lower on earnings jitters; financials down\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-12 06:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK, Oct 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.</p>\n<p>Supply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co&nbsp; results on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Indexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500 along with Amazon.com</p>\n<p>, which fell 1.3%. The S&amp;P financial index&nbsp;was down 1%, while communication services&nbsp;dropped 1.5%.</p>\n<p>\"The market is a bit cautious going into this earnings season,\" said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment strategist at Inverness Counsel in New York. \"Supply chain issues may have impacted earnings for a number of companies and certain industries more than others.\"</p>\n<p>While another period of strong U.S. profit growth is forecast for Corporate America, earnings are shaping up to be crucial for investors worried about how supply disruptions and inflation pressures will affect bottom lines.</p>\n<p>That could lead to more volatility on Wall Street following a bruising September. Analysts expect a 29.6% year-over-year increase in profit for S&amp;P 500 companies in the third quarter, according to IBES data from Refinitiv as of Friday.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 250.19 points, or 0.72%, to 34,496.06, the S&amp;P 500 lost 30.15 points, or 0.69%, to 4,361.19 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 93.34 points, or 0.64%, to 14,486.20.</p>\n<p>The energy sector&nbsp;also ended lower after hitting its highest since January 2020 earlier in the day. Higher oil prices have fed into concerns about rising costs for businesses and consumers.</p>\n<p>Analysts do expect some positive earnings news. \"If you're a larger company, you're able to mitigate a lot of these issues,\" said Christopher Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities in New York.</p>\n<p>Managements \"have been very cognizant of their budgets and not sacrificing margins.\" Plus, demand remains strong, he said.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> Inc.&nbsp;was down 2.2% and Mastercard Inc&nbsp;also fell 2.2% among the biggest drags on the S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.15 billion shares, compared with the 10.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Trading may have been slower due to the U.S. federal holiday Monday, with U.S. bond markets shut for the day.</p>\n<p>Among individual stocks, Southwest Airlines Co fell 4.2% on a report that it canceled at least 30% of scheduled flights on Sunday.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","V":"Visa","JPM":"摩根大通",".DJI":"道琼斯","LUV":"西南航空","AMZN":"亚马逊",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","MA":"万事达"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2174854361","content_text":"NEW YORK, Oct 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session lower on Monday as investors grew nervous ahead of third-quarter earnings reporting season.\nSupply chain problems and higher costs for energy and other things have fueled concern about earnings, set to kick off with JPMorgan Chase & Co  results on Wednesday.\nIndexes reversed early gains after midday and added to losses just before the close. JPMorgan shares were down 2.1% and among the biggest drags on the S&P 500 along with Amazon.com\n, which fell 1.3%. The S&P financial index was down 1%, while communication services dropped 1.5%.\n\"The market is a bit cautious going into this earnings season,\" said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment strategist at Inverness Counsel in New York. \"Supply chain issues may have impacted earnings for a number of companies and certain industries more than others.\"\nWhile another period of strong U.S. profit growth is forecast for Corporate America, earnings are shaping up to be crucial for investors worried about how supply disruptions and inflation pressures will affect bottom lines.\nThat could lead to more volatility on Wall Street following a bruising September. Analysts expect a 29.6% year-over-year increase in profit for S&P 500 companies in the third quarter, according to IBES data from Refinitiv as of Friday.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 250.19 points, or 0.72%, to 34,496.06, the S&P 500 lost 30.15 points, or 0.69%, to 4,361.19 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 93.34 points, or 0.64%, to 14,486.20.\nThe energy sector also ended lower after hitting its highest since January 2020 earlier in the day. Higher oil prices have fed into concerns about rising costs for businesses and consumers.\nAnalysts do expect some positive earnings news. \"If you're a larger company, you're able to mitigate a lot of these issues,\" said Christopher Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities in New York.\nManagements \"have been very cognizant of their budgets and not sacrificing margins.\" Plus, demand remains strong, he said.\nVisa Inc. was down 2.2% and Mastercard Inc also fell 2.2% among the biggest drags on the S&P 500.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.15 billion shares, compared with the 10.9 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.\nTrading may have been slower due to the U.S. federal holiday Monday, with U.S. bond markets shut for the day.\nAmong individual stocks, Southwest Airlines Co fell 4.2% on a report that it canceled at least 30% of scheduled flights on Sunday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"JPM":0.9,"LUV":0.9,"MA":0.9,"V":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823116942,"gmtCreate":1633597908102,"gmtModify":1633597908562,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823116942","repostId":"2173946751","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1485,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823116005,"gmtCreate":1633597896063,"gmtModify":1633597896181,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823116005","repostId":"2173946751","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1267,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823118108,"gmtCreate":1633597831693,"gmtModify":1633597831850,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823118108","repostId":"1129125427","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1589,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":821918432,"gmtCreate":1633684979114,"gmtModify":1633684979290,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821918432","repostId":"1154698505","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154698505","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633678648,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154698505?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-08 15:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Tesla's Stock Forecast Impacted By Rivian R1T Electric Truck?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154698505","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nTesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants suc","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Tesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants such as the Cybertruck - which recently got delayed.</li>\n <li>Peers are entering the highly attractive electric truck space way before Tesla, including Rivian with its R1T and Ford with the F-150 Lightning.</li>\n <li>This could hurt Tesla's brand image as well as its stock price, as Tesla has lost the first-mover advantage in this important future market.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccf7c15134ff043f2c3df0d488a4f631\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1022\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>David Becker/Getty Images News</span></p>\n<p><b>Article Thesis</b></p>\n<p>Tesla, Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA)is priced for massive growth over the coming years. The company's industry position is strong today, but competition is a concern. Rivian Automotive's (RIVN) R1T truck will gain a sizeable presence in the electric truck space, which could hurt the outlook for Tesla's Cybertruck that is still about two years away from mass production. Generally, this space should be large enough to accommodate several players a couple of years from now, but the fact that Tesla has lost its first-mover advantage is naturally not a positive. Overall, Tesla's shares seem pretty expensive for where the company stands today, but depending on market sentiment, shares may still run higher.</p>\n<p><b>Is Rivian Publicly Traded?</b></p>\n<p>Rivian Automotive is, so far, not publicly traded. The company plans to go public in the near term, however, as Rivian has filed theS-1for its initial public offering a couple of days ago. The company seeks to sell 10% of its shares for around $8 billion, which would value the company at $80 billion. For a company that has just recently started mass-producing its first model, that seems quite expensive, but then again, Rivian is backed by companies such as Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN)and Ford(NYSE:F)and has a compelling product and the first-mover advantage in the electric truck market.</p>\n<p><b>How Is Rivian Different From Tesla?</b></p>\n<p>The two companies are active in the same industry, but there are vast differences between them. The most obvious one is the size and scale of the company -- Tesla is currently producing around 900,000 vehicles a year, while Rivian has just begun producing its first model. Tesla operates several factories across different continents and owns a network of stores and superchargers, while the same is not true for Rivian. Last but not least, Tesla is ambitious to become a major player in energy storage, solar, etc. These ventures are not profitable yet, which limits the current value of these business units, but Tesla is clearly more diversified across the whole \"new energy\" industry compared to Rivian, which is an EV manufacturer solely.</p>\n<p>Tesla's way larger size and established operations also lead to another important difference -- Tesla is, unlike Rivian, profitable and able to self-fund its operations and capital expenditures, which makes it less dependent on capital markets. Rivian will, for the foreseeable future, rely on capital markets to fund its future growth.</p>\n<p><b>Will Tesla Be Impacted By Rivian's R1T Truck?</b></p>\n<p>Tesla has, in the past, grown its production volumes and revenues reliably through two growth drivers: The introduction of new models, and through increasing sales volumes for its existing models. Over the last couple of quarters, almost all of Tesla's sales stemmed from Model 3 and Model Y sales, as X and S sales took a backseat. Future growth will likely be driven by increasing sales of Tesla's 3 and Y models, but the company is also dependent on the introduction of new models to some degree. The Roadster 2 will not be a volume model, but a lot of hope rests on Tesla's Cybertruck. The Cybertruck, which was presented in 2019, will go into production towards the end of 2022, according to CEO&nbsp;Elon Musk. Mass production, however, is still further away, and targeted for the end of 2023, or about two years from now.</p>\n<p>When we consider the fact that Tesla has oftentimes missed its own timelines, be it robo-taxis, the Roadster 2, or others, it seems possible that the Cybertruck will be delayed further, and may not be mass-produced before 2024. This would be the case if Tesla misses current estimates by a couple of months, which wouldn't be an overly large surprise. By that time, Rivian will have produced its R1T truck for a couple of years, and others will have entered the attractive electric truck market as well. Ford, for example, is on track to bring its F-150 Lighting to the market soon, as&nbsp;pre-production&nbsp;started in September, and market entry is just a matter of months.</p>\n<p>The competition from Rivian's R1T and Ford's F-150 could impact Tesla in several ways. First, the fact that the Cybertruck will be late to the market relative to competitors' products will mean that those customers that are very eager to buy an electric truck will go with Rivian or Ford, and not Tesla. Those very eager customers do likely include many that are willing to pay above-average prices, which will allow Ford and Rivian to absorb buying power that is then not available for Tesla when it brings out its Cybertruck two years later.</p>\n<p>On top of that, the fact that the R1T and the F-150 Lighting will be on the roads well before the Cybertruck is available could hurt Tesla's image as a key electric truck manufacturer. Tesla has the brand advantage in EVs, generally, thanks to its first-mover advantage. But with it being late in the truck space, this first-mover advantage and the increased brand recognition could fall to Rivian and Ford instead of Tesla. As long as Rivian's and Ford's products satisfy customers (which is not guaranteed), truck buyers might build brand loyalty with Rivian and Ford, which could hurt Tesla's ability to sell its Cybertruck and future electric trucks in the long run. Once the opportunity to be a first-mover is missed, others have the advantage, similar to how Tesla has an advantage in selling electric cars today.</p>\n<p>Last but not least, successful launches by Rivian and Ford could also impact Tesla's stock valuation. In case both Rivian and Ford are able to scale up production well and sell large amounts of electric trucks before the Cybertruck is released, investors interested in EV stocks may start to divert away from Tesla. If Rivian is successful in rolling out an electric truck well before Tesla, some current Tesla shareholders may decide to go with Rivian instead, or to split investments between the two companies. This could, in turn, lead to lower demand for Tesla's shares and to some selling pressure, which would be a negative for TSLA stock.</p>\n<p>None of these is guaranteed, and it is, of course, possible that Tesla beats its own timeline and that the Cybertruck will be made available sooner than expected. It is also possible that manufacturing problems for the R1T or the F-150 Lightning emerge, which would mean that Tesla has more time to catch up. But for now it looks like Rivian and Ford are in the leadership position in the electric truck space, and Tesla being behind its competitors naturally is a negative for the company and its stock. This could hurt demand for the Cybertruck, hurt Tesla's brand image as a technological leader and first-mover, and it could make its shares less compelling relative to those of other EV manufacturers.</p>\n<p><b>Is Tesla Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?</b></p>\n<p>The electric truck space will be large enough to allow several players to do well a couple of years from now, thus Tesla being behind with its Cybertruck does not mean that the model will not sell well. But it is still important to know whether a company will hold a 30% market share or a 20% market share, for example, five years from now. With Tesla being behind competitors, I do believe that it is not very likely that Tesla will dominate the US electric truck space the same way it dominates the US electric car space today.</p>\n<p>Tesla will still see its volumes and revenue grow over the coming years, but growth may not be meaningful enough to justify the current valuation. Tesla is forecasted to generate revenue of $51 billion this year, $67 billion in 2022, and $83 billion in 2023:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c2d74e02403e2b6edbc187bf103c6bb\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>This equates to a growth rate of 31% next year and 24% in 2023. Note that expected revenue growth is less than the 50% average volume growth expected by Tesla, due to the fact that current analyst models predict that Tesla may not be able to deliver on that goal, while average sales price compression could also be a headwind for revenue growth. Overall, revenue growth in the 20%-30% range is still attractive, of course, compared to legacy auto players that do not manage to grow this meaningfully.</p>\n<p>With 1.12 billion diluted shares, Tesla is currently valued at $875 billion, which equates to a forward sales multiple of 17. Likewise, the sales multiples for 2022 and 2023 stand at 13 and 11, respectively. These are not only very high valuations relative to legacy auto makers, but even relative to some of the other EV players. NIO(NYSE:NIO)and XPeng(NYSE:XPEV), for example, which are growing faster than Tesla, are both valued at 6x 2022's expected revenue today, which makes for a little less than half of Tesla's valuation. Lucid(NASDAQ:LCID), which is a pretty new market entrant, and which should grow faster than Tesla on a relative basis over the coming years, is valued at&nbsp;10x&nbsp;2023's expected revenue, versus Tesla's 11x 2023's expected revenue. Overall, I do thus believe that Tesla's shares are too expensive at current prices. This does not at all mean that Tesla is a bad company or that the company will not generate any business growth, but valuations should always be considered. The fact that Tesla is way behind competitors in the electric truck segment is another reason, for me, to believe that Tesla's current valuation is too high -- shares are priced for perfection, and Tesla is far from being perfect, even though the company is solid for sure.</p>\n<p>Tesla's overly high valuation versus legacy players with growing EV businesses, such as Ford or Volkswagen(OTCPK:VWAGY), and Tesla's premium valuation versus higher-growth EV peers makes me believe that shares are an avoid at current prices. Locking in gains could be a good idea for those that are long the stock.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Tesla's Stock Forecast Impacted By Rivian R1T Electric Truck?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Tesla's Stock Forecast Impacted By Rivian R1T Electric Truck?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-08 15:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4458901-tesla-stock-forecast-rivian-r1t-electric-truck><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nTesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants such as the Cybertruck - which recently got delayed.\nPeers are entering the highly attractive electric ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4458901-tesla-stock-forecast-rivian-r1t-electric-truck\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4458901-tesla-stock-forecast-rivian-r1t-electric-truck","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154698505","content_text":"Summary\n\nTesla does not have a large model range right now and is thus dependent on new entrants such as the Cybertruck - which recently got delayed.\nPeers are entering the highly attractive electric truck space way before Tesla, including Rivian with its R1T and Ford with the F-150 Lightning.\nThis could hurt Tesla's brand image as well as its stock price, as Tesla has lost the first-mover advantage in this important future market.\n\nDavid Becker/Getty Images News\nArticle Thesis\nTesla, Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA)is priced for massive growth over the coming years. The company's industry position is strong today, but competition is a concern. Rivian Automotive's (RIVN) R1T truck will gain a sizeable presence in the electric truck space, which could hurt the outlook for Tesla's Cybertruck that is still about two years away from mass production. Generally, this space should be large enough to accommodate several players a couple of years from now, but the fact that Tesla has lost its first-mover advantage is naturally not a positive. Overall, Tesla's shares seem pretty expensive for where the company stands today, but depending on market sentiment, shares may still run higher.\nIs Rivian Publicly Traded?\nRivian Automotive is, so far, not publicly traded. The company plans to go public in the near term, however, as Rivian has filed theS-1for its initial public offering a couple of days ago. The company seeks to sell 10% of its shares for around $8 billion, which would value the company at $80 billion. For a company that has just recently started mass-producing its first model, that seems quite expensive, but then again, Rivian is backed by companies such as Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN)and Ford(NYSE:F)and has a compelling product and the first-mover advantage in the electric truck market.\nHow Is Rivian Different From Tesla?\nThe two companies are active in the same industry, but there are vast differences between them. The most obvious one is the size and scale of the company -- Tesla is currently producing around 900,000 vehicles a year, while Rivian has just begun producing its first model. Tesla operates several factories across different continents and owns a network of stores and superchargers, while the same is not true for Rivian. Last but not least, Tesla is ambitious to become a major player in energy storage, solar, etc. These ventures are not profitable yet, which limits the current value of these business units, but Tesla is clearly more diversified across the whole \"new energy\" industry compared to Rivian, which is an EV manufacturer solely.\nTesla's way larger size and established operations also lead to another important difference -- Tesla is, unlike Rivian, profitable and able to self-fund its operations and capital expenditures, which makes it less dependent on capital markets. Rivian will, for the foreseeable future, rely on capital markets to fund its future growth.\nWill Tesla Be Impacted By Rivian's R1T Truck?\nTesla has, in the past, grown its production volumes and revenues reliably through two growth drivers: The introduction of new models, and through increasing sales volumes for its existing models. Over the last couple of quarters, almost all of Tesla's sales stemmed from Model 3 and Model Y sales, as X and S sales took a backseat. Future growth will likely be driven by increasing sales of Tesla's 3 and Y models, but the company is also dependent on the introduction of new models to some degree. The Roadster 2 will not be a volume model, but a lot of hope rests on Tesla's Cybertruck. The Cybertruck, which was presented in 2019, will go into production towards the end of 2022, according to CEO Elon Musk. Mass production, however, is still further away, and targeted for the end of 2023, or about two years from now.\nWhen we consider the fact that Tesla has oftentimes missed its own timelines, be it robo-taxis, the Roadster 2, or others, it seems possible that the Cybertruck will be delayed further, and may not be mass-produced before 2024. This would be the case if Tesla misses current estimates by a couple of months, which wouldn't be an overly large surprise. By that time, Rivian will have produced its R1T truck for a couple of years, and others will have entered the attractive electric truck market as well. Ford, for example, is on track to bring its F-150 Lighting to the market soon, as pre-production started in September, and market entry is just a matter of months.\nThe competition from Rivian's R1T and Ford's F-150 could impact Tesla in several ways. First, the fact that the Cybertruck will be late to the market relative to competitors' products will mean that those customers that are very eager to buy an electric truck will go with Rivian or Ford, and not Tesla. Those very eager customers do likely include many that are willing to pay above-average prices, which will allow Ford and Rivian to absorb buying power that is then not available for Tesla when it brings out its Cybertruck two years later.\nOn top of that, the fact that the R1T and the F-150 Lighting will be on the roads well before the Cybertruck is available could hurt Tesla's image as a key electric truck manufacturer. Tesla has the brand advantage in EVs, generally, thanks to its first-mover advantage. But with it being late in the truck space, this first-mover advantage and the increased brand recognition could fall to Rivian and Ford instead of Tesla. As long as Rivian's and Ford's products satisfy customers (which is not guaranteed), truck buyers might build brand loyalty with Rivian and Ford, which could hurt Tesla's ability to sell its Cybertruck and future electric trucks in the long run. Once the opportunity to be a first-mover is missed, others have the advantage, similar to how Tesla has an advantage in selling electric cars today.\nLast but not least, successful launches by Rivian and Ford could also impact Tesla's stock valuation. In case both Rivian and Ford are able to scale up production well and sell large amounts of electric trucks before the Cybertruck is released, investors interested in EV stocks may start to divert away from Tesla. If Rivian is successful in rolling out an electric truck well before Tesla, some current Tesla shareholders may decide to go with Rivian instead, or to split investments between the two companies. This could, in turn, lead to lower demand for Tesla's shares and to some selling pressure, which would be a negative for TSLA stock.\nNone of these is guaranteed, and it is, of course, possible that Tesla beats its own timeline and that the Cybertruck will be made available sooner than expected. It is also possible that manufacturing problems for the R1T or the F-150 Lightning emerge, which would mean that Tesla has more time to catch up. But for now it looks like Rivian and Ford are in the leadership position in the electric truck space, and Tesla being behind its competitors naturally is a negative for the company and its stock. This could hurt demand for the Cybertruck, hurt Tesla's brand image as a technological leader and first-mover, and it could make its shares less compelling relative to those of other EV manufacturers.\nIs Tesla Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?\nThe electric truck space will be large enough to allow several players to do well a couple of years from now, thus Tesla being behind with its Cybertruck does not mean that the model will not sell well. But it is still important to know whether a company will hold a 30% market share or a 20% market share, for example, five years from now. With Tesla being behind competitors, I do believe that it is not very likely that Tesla will dominate the US electric truck space the same way it dominates the US electric car space today.\nTesla will still see its volumes and revenue grow over the coming years, but growth may not be meaningful enough to justify the current valuation. Tesla is forecasted to generate revenue of $51 billion this year, $67 billion in 2022, and $83 billion in 2023:\nData by YCharts\nThis equates to a growth rate of 31% next year and 24% in 2023. Note that expected revenue growth is less than the 50% average volume growth expected by Tesla, due to the fact that current analyst models predict that Tesla may not be able to deliver on that goal, while average sales price compression could also be a headwind for revenue growth. Overall, revenue growth in the 20%-30% range is still attractive, of course, compared to legacy auto players that do not manage to grow this meaningfully.\nWith 1.12 billion diluted shares, Tesla is currently valued at $875 billion, which equates to a forward sales multiple of 17. Likewise, the sales multiples for 2022 and 2023 stand at 13 and 11, respectively. These are not only very high valuations relative to legacy auto makers, but even relative to some of the other EV players. NIO(NYSE:NIO)and XPeng(NYSE:XPEV), for example, which are growing faster than Tesla, are both valued at 6x 2022's expected revenue today, which makes for a little less than half of Tesla's valuation. Lucid(NASDAQ:LCID), which is a pretty new market entrant, and which should grow faster than Tesla on a relative basis over the coming years, is valued at 10x 2023's expected revenue, versus Tesla's 11x 2023's expected revenue. Overall, I do thus believe that Tesla's shares are too expensive at current prices. This does not at all mean that Tesla is a bad company or that the company will not generate any business growth, but valuations should always be considered. The fact that Tesla is way behind competitors in the electric truck segment is another reason, for me, to believe that Tesla's current valuation is too high -- shares are priced for perfection, and Tesla is far from being perfect, even though the company is solid for sure.\nTesla's overly high valuation versus legacy players with growing EV businesses, such as Ford or Volkswagen(OTCPK:VWAGY), and Tesla's premium valuation versus higher-growth EV peers makes me believe that shares are an avoid at current prices. Locking in gains could be a good idea for those that are long the stock.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":682,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823111384,"gmtCreate":1633597747865,"gmtModify":1633597748007,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823111384","repostId":"1197899038","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":818,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":880096983,"gmtCreate":1630996008942,"gmtModify":1631889509251,"author":{"id":"4092954016720550","authorId":"4092954016720550","name":"Ramesh78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0c1ebc7b58a181d8b45be1ce9b944a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4092954016720550","authorIdStr":"4092954016720550"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880096983","repostId":"2165334935","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2165334935","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1630995423,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2165334935?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-07 14:17","market":"uk","language":"en","title":"Hyundai to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions of all commercial vehicles by 2028","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2165334935","media":"Reuters","summary":"SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions ","content":"<p>SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions for all its commercial vehicles by 2028 and will cut the price of fuel cell vehicles to battery electric levels two years later.</p>\n<p>The group, which comprises Hyundai Motor Co and Kia Corp, currently has <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> fuel cell bus and one fuel cell truck, the Xcient Hyundai, on the market. There are 115 of the buses on the road in South Korea and 45 of the trucks in operation after they were rolled out in Switzerland last year.</p>\n<p>The two South Korean automakers together offer 20 models of commercial vehicles including trucks, buses and vans, and sold about 287,000 last year.</p>\n<p>The group, whose only other fuel cell vehicle on the market is Hyundai's Nexo SUV, also said it will develop fuel cell vehicles for Kia and its premium Genesis brand, which could be launched after 2025. It did not mention specific targets for fuel cell versions of passenger vehicle models.</p>\n<p>The plans are measured ambitions to push ahead with hydrogen technology despite its relative niche status, while the automakers also expand their battery electric vehicle line-up.</p>\n<p>Advocates assert that hydrogen fuel cells are cleaner than other carbon-cutting methods as they only emit water and heat, but the technology has only seen limited usage in the auto industry amid concerns about high costs, the bulky size of fuel cell systems, the lack of fuelling stations, resale values and the risk of hydrogen explosions.</p>\n<p>Industry-wide, some 10,000-15,000 fuel cell vehicles are produced globally a year compared to 4-5 million electric vehicles, Hyundai said.</p>\n<p>Other major automakers pursuing hydrogen fuel cell technology include Toyota Motor Corp, BMW and Daimler. They have been encouraged as Europe and China have set ambitious emission reduction targets and talk of hydrogen infrastructure support increases.</p>\n<p>Hyundai Motor Group also said it also plans to employ hydrogen fuel cell technology in other areas such as autonomous container transport.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hyundai to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions of all commercial vehicles by 2028</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHyundai to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions of all commercial vehicles by 2028\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-07 14:17</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions for all its commercial vehicles by 2028 and will cut the price of fuel cell vehicles to battery electric levels two years later.</p>\n<p>The group, which comprises Hyundai Motor Co and Kia Corp, currently has <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> fuel cell bus and one fuel cell truck, the Xcient Hyundai, on the market. There are 115 of the buses on the road in South Korea and 45 of the trucks in operation after they were rolled out in Switzerland last year.</p>\n<p>The two South Korean automakers together offer 20 models of commercial vehicles including trucks, buses and vans, and sold about 287,000 last year.</p>\n<p>The group, whose only other fuel cell vehicle on the market is Hyundai's Nexo SUV, also said it will develop fuel cell vehicles for Kia and its premium Genesis brand, which could be launched after 2025. It did not mention specific targets for fuel cell versions of passenger vehicle models.</p>\n<p>The plans are measured ambitions to push ahead with hydrogen technology despite its relative niche status, while the automakers also expand their battery electric vehicle line-up.</p>\n<p>Advocates assert that hydrogen fuel cells are cleaner than other carbon-cutting methods as they only emit water and heat, but the technology has only seen limited usage in the auto industry amid concerns about high costs, the bulky size of fuel cell systems, the lack of fuelling stations, resale values and the risk of hydrogen explosions.</p>\n<p>Industry-wide, some 10,000-15,000 fuel cell vehicles are produced globally a year compared to 4-5 million electric vehicles, Hyundai said.</p>\n<p>Other major automakers pursuing hydrogen fuel cell technology include Toyota Motor Corp, BMW and Daimler. They have been encouraged as Europe and China have set ambitious emission reduction targets and talk of hydrogen infrastructure support increases.</p>\n<p>Hyundai Motor Group also said it also plans to employ hydrogen fuel cell technology in other areas such as autonomous container transport.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HYMLF":"Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2165334935","content_text":"SEOUL (Reuters) - Hyundai Motor Group said on Tuesday it plans to offer hydrogen fuel cell versions for all its commercial vehicles by 2028 and will cut the price of fuel cell vehicles to battery electric levels two years later.\nThe group, which comprises Hyundai Motor Co and Kia Corp, currently has one fuel cell bus and one fuel cell truck, the Xcient Hyundai, on the market. There are 115 of the buses on the road in South Korea and 45 of the trucks in operation after they were rolled out in Switzerland last year.\nThe two South Korean automakers together offer 20 models of commercial vehicles including trucks, buses and vans, and sold about 287,000 last year.\nThe group, whose only other fuel cell vehicle on the market is Hyundai's Nexo SUV, also said it will develop fuel cell vehicles for Kia and its premium Genesis brand, which could be launched after 2025. It did not mention specific targets for fuel cell versions of passenger vehicle models.\nThe plans are measured ambitions to push ahead with hydrogen technology despite its relative niche status, while the automakers also expand their battery electric vehicle line-up.\nAdvocates assert that hydrogen fuel cells are cleaner than other carbon-cutting methods as they only emit water and heat, but the technology has only seen limited usage in the auto industry amid concerns about high costs, the bulky size of fuel cell systems, the lack of fuelling stations, resale values and the risk of hydrogen explosions.\nIndustry-wide, some 10,000-15,000 fuel cell vehicles are produced globally a year compared to 4-5 million electric vehicles, Hyundai said.\nOther major automakers pursuing hydrogen fuel cell technology include Toyota Motor Corp, BMW and Daimler. They have been encouraged as Europe and China have set ambitious emission reduction targets and talk of hydrogen infrastructure support increases.\nHyundai Motor Group also said it also plans to employ hydrogen fuel cell technology in other areas such as autonomous container transport.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HYMLF":0.9,"HYUD.UK":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":261,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}