社区
首页
集团介绍
社区
资讯
行情
学堂
TigerAI
登录
注册
AMeow
IP属地：海外
+关注
帖子 · 8
帖子 · 8
关注 · 0
关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0
粉丝 · 0
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-09-10
[财迷]
看
477
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-08-05
Omg
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
317
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-08-05
[财迷] wow
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
772
回复
1
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-08-02
Wa
Bitcoin Pares Weekend Rally That Took Coin to Highest Since May
Bitcoin retreated Monday back toward $40,000 after climbing over the weekend to the highest levels s
Bitcoin Pares Weekend Rally That Took Coin to Highest Since May
看
248
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-08-02
[惊讶]
Disney Ignites A Firestorm By Dissing Scarlett Johansson: How To Damage An Iconic Company Brand In One Move
Scarlett Johansson attends 26th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards (Photo by Leon Bennett/Getty... [+
Disney Ignites A Firestorm By Dissing Scarlett Johansson: How To Damage An Iconic Company Brand In One Move
看
1,056
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-08-02
Will it rise?
看
237
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-07-02
[强] [强]
3 Expensive Tech Stocks to Buy in the Next Market Crash
Get ready to buy Snowflake and two other hot tech stocks if this frothy market collapses.
3 Expensive Tech Stocks to Buy in the Next Market Crash
看
887
回复
1
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
AMeow
AMeow
·
2021-07-01
Great ariticle, would you like to share it?
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
439
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
加载更多
热议股票
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3552790388588156","uuid":"3552790388588156","gmtCreate":1589871440392,"gmtModify":1625110414450,"name":"AMeow","pinyin":"ameow","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":78,"tweetSize":8,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":3,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"02aa7f16703b4ce4ace6f1a7665789cc-1","templateUuid":"02aa7f16703b4ce4ace6f1a7665789cc","name":"知识体验官","description":"观看学堂课程满5节","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb5ae275631fb96a92d475cdc85d2302","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c2660a1935bd2105e97c9915619936c3","grayImgUrl":null,"redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.05","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2006},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"60.90%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.40%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":6,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"海外","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":883542625,"gmtCreate":1631259682767,"gmtModify":1632883594024,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[财迷] ","listText":"[财迷] ","text":"[财迷]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0647b584d664685a7748ae713581cf10","width":"720","height":"1280"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/883542625","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":477,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":890708260,"gmtCreate":1628131523750,"gmtModify":1633753274732,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Omg","listText":"Omg","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890708260","repostId":"1152505740","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":317,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890709781,"gmtCreate":1628131340343,"gmtModify":1633753276921,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[财迷] wow","listText":"[财迷] wow","text":"[财迷] wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890709781","repostId":"1158747638","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":772,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":805850865,"gmtCreate":1627871303157,"gmtModify":1633755744764,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wa","listText":"Wa","text":"Wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/805850865","repostId":"1170312436","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170312436","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627864359,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1170312436?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-02 08:32","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Bitcoin Pares Weekend Rally That Took Coin to Highest Since May","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170312436","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Bitcoin retreated Monday back toward $40,000 after climbing over the weekend to the highest levels s","content":"<p>Bitcoin retreated Monday back toward $40,000 after climbing over the weekend to the highest levels since May.</p>\n<p>The largest cryptocurrency fell as much as 3% and was trading at $40,380 as of 7:03 a.m. in Hong Kong. Other virtual coins including second-ranked Ether also fell. A trigger for the declines beyond possible profit-taking wasn’t immediately apparent.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04da3d6e57f3f801bf6532b2aff048b3\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Bitcoin has rallied over the past two weeks, breaking past the upper bound of a prolonged trading range between $30,000 and $40,000. It’s been bolstered by supportive comments from billionaire Elon Musk and Ark Investment Management LLC’s Cathie Wood, as well as speculation over Amazon.com Inc.’s possible involvement in the cryptocurrency sector.</p>\n<p>At the same time, scrutiny of the industry is intensifying. That includes apushby U.S. legislators for stricter rules on cryptocurrency investors to collect more taxes to fund a portion of a planned $550 billion investment into transportation and power systems.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bitcoin Pares Weekend Rally That Took Coin to Highest Since May</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBitcoin Pares Weekend Rally That Took Coin to Highest Since May\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-02 08:32 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-01/bitcoin-pares-weekend-rally-that-took-coin-to-highest-since-may><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bitcoin retreated Monday back toward $40,000 after climbing over the weekend to the highest levels since May.\nThe largest cryptocurrency fell as much as 3% and was trading at $40,380 as of 7:03 a.m. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-01/bitcoin-pares-weekend-rally-that-took-coin-to-highest-since-may\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-01/bitcoin-pares-weekend-rally-that-took-coin-to-highest-since-may","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170312436","content_text":"Bitcoin retreated Monday back toward $40,000 after climbing over the weekend to the highest levels since May.\nThe largest cryptocurrency fell as much as 3% and was trading at $40,380 as of 7:03 a.m. in Hong Kong. Other virtual coins including second-ranked Ether also fell. A trigger for the declines beyond possible profit-taking wasn’t immediately apparent.\n\nBitcoin has rallied over the past two weeks, breaking past the upper bound of a prolonged trading range between $30,000 and $40,000. It’s been bolstered by supportive comments from billionaire Elon Musk and Ark Investment Management LLC’s Cathie Wood, as well as speculation over Amazon.com Inc.’s possible involvement in the cryptocurrency sector.\nAt the same time, scrutiny of the industry is intensifying. That includes apushby U.S. legislators for stricter rules on cryptocurrency investors to collect more taxes to fund a portion of a planned $550 billion investment into transportation and power systems.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"COIN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":248,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":805824076,"gmtCreate":1627871124695,"gmtModify":1633755746332,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[惊讶] ","listText":"[惊讶] ","text":"[惊讶]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/805824076","repostId":"1196050859","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196050859","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627865019,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196050859?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-02 08:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Ignites A Firestorm By Dissing Scarlett Johansson: How To Damage An Iconic Company Brand In One Move","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196050859","media":"Forbes","summary":"Scarlett Johansson attends 26th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards (Photo by Leon Bennett/Getty... [+","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9301c787b703c07ec14dcd85e9c2aa85\" tg-width=\"960\" tg-height=\"450\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Scarlett Johansson attends 26th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards (Photo by Leon Bennett/Getty... [+]</p>\n<p>GETTY IMAGES</p>\n<p>Here are some headlines from late last week:</p>\n<p><b><i>‘Black Widow’ Scarlett Johansson Lawsuit: Actress’ Agent Slams Disney For “Direct Attack On Her Character” & Leaving Talent Out Of Streaming Profit Equation</i></b><b>—Deadline</b></p>\n<p><b><i>Groups denounce Disney's Scarlett Johansson response as a \"gendered character attack\"</i></b><b>—Yahoo</b></p>\n<p><b><i>Women In Film, ReFrame & Time’s Up Condemn Disney For “Gendered Character Attack” On Scarlett Johansson In Her ‘Black Widow’ Lawsuit</i></b><b>—Deadline</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> just shocked the industry, movie goers, Marvel fans, Scarlett Johansson lovers, and media watchdogs alike with its unnecessary, nasty response toJohansson’s suit regarding “Black Widow’s” changed distribution plans.</p>\n<p>Instead of taking the high road in their public response to what is essentially a business matter — albeit an important financial one — they decided to go low and go mean.And in so doing not only have they angered industry leaders like Johansson’s agents at CAA, action movie fans, andwomen’s rights advocates, they have seriously put a dent in their reputation with their “un-Disney-like,” off-brand behavior. Nasty, mean-spirited ad hominem attacks are just not what the public expects from Disney, or Marvel. These are supposed to be the good guys, after all.</p>\n<p><b>Damaging the Disney brand</b></p>\n<p>Disney: what were you thinking?</p>\n<p>Responding to Johannson’s suit claiming Disney breached her contract regarding the movie’s distribution by deciding to release the movie simultaneously on their streaming service as well as in theaters, then refusing to renegotiate and therefore seriously hurting her total compensation for starring in the blockbuster film that uniquely features two women heroines — Johansson and Florence Pugh — Disney went far beyond the formulaic “This suit is totally without merit, and we look forward to proving that in a court of law.”</p>\n<p>Instead they used their response to demean and shame her in some ways that look pretty sexist to a lot of folks inside and outside the industry.</p>\n<p>Specifically, they said, as reported in Deadline:</p>\n<p>“The lawsuit is especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the Covid-19 pandemic...” What?</p>\n<p>Then, they went on to reveal for the first time that she is making $20 million already on the film — apparently seeking to shame the actress by — oh my — showing how much money she earns from a blockbuster movie. Really?</p>\n<p><b>Character assassination with sexist overtones</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/676f9412c5e97545a2a9d2392bf74cd4\" tg-width=\"960\" tg-height=\"1533\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><i>Tweet from Women in Film, ReFrame Project, and Time's Up</i></p>\n<p><i>DAVIA TEMIN</i></p>\n<p>In a move that Time’s Up, Reframe, and Women in Film call “a gendered character attack,”Disney manages to forget the fact that male action superstars like Robert Downey Jr., Ryan Reynolds, Duanne Johnson and Will Smith regularly make $20 to $35 million per movie, with share of box office additional. But I guess women aren’t supposed to be paid like men, still, in Hollywood?</p>\n<p><b>CAA fights back</b></p>\n<p>Disney’s highly disparaging statements angered the powerful agents CAA enough that her agent and CAA C0-Chair Bryan Lourd,responded the next daywith</p>\n<p>“I want to address the Walt Disney Company’s statement that was issued in response to the lawsuit filed against them yesterday by our client Scarlett Johansson. They have shamelessly and falsely accused Ms. Johansson of being insensitive to the global COVID pandemic, in an attempt to make her appear to be someone they and I know she isn’t.</p>\n<p>“Scarlett has been Disney’s partner on nine movies, which have earned Disney and its shareholders billions. The company included her salary in their press statement in an attempt to weaponize her success as an artist and businesswoman, as if that were something she should be ashamed of. Scarlett is extremely proud of the work that she, and all of the actors, writers, directors, producers, and the Marvel creative team have been a part of for well over a decade.</p>\n<p>“This suit was filed as a result of Disney’s decision to knowingly violate Scarlett’s contract. They have very deliberately moved the revenue stream and profits to the Disney+ side of the company leaving artistic and financial partners out of their new equation. That’s it, pure and simple.</p>\n<p>“Disney’s direct attack on her character and all else they implied is beneath the company that many of us in the creative community have worked with successfully for decades....”</p>\n<p><b>Battle of titans in real life</b></p>\n<p>So it looks like there’s going to be a battle of titans both on and off the screen. The financial stakes are considerable, of course. It has been reported that Disney’s move could cost Johansson $50 million in share of box office that her contract provides for. And it sets a precedent.</p>\n<p>But worse, for Disney and the general public, is that Disney felt entitled to go after Johansson — one of their most popular action heroes and one of their only breakthrough female action megastars — by demeaning and shaming her. Do they find this acceptable behavior? Shouldn’t they be supporting their female action heroes, not dissing them?</p>\n<p><b>Supporting brands by staying on message</b></p>\n<p>Suits happen all the time — and mostly they are procedural necessities, formulaically handled. But every organization is defined by its public actions as well as by its public statements. This is one reason organizations worry so much about “messaging,” and staying “on message.” Their messages do need to be congruent with their purpose, operating philosophy, reputation, and their general interest in issues beyond the financial — their stakeholders, not only their shareholders.</p>\n<p>Disney’s iconic brand, carefully forged for decades, has usually been of wholesomeness, family values, and being on the side of the good guys. If they think that by going so seriously against their core brand, and by being snide and manipulative about Johansson’s compensation, they are going to curry favor with the public, they have sorely misjudged the situation. We’re talking about equity here, as well as gender equality. And core values.</p>\n<p>By underestimating the response of key audiences to their attack-dog tactics to what is a reasonable objection and law suit, they have harmed their own reputation. It is not yet clear how badly.</p>\n<p>But it is probably time for Disney the company to be doing some serious reevaluation of their public, and private, postures regarding fairness, equity, and gender equality. And about living up to their own brand promise.</p>\n<p>And, perhaps, they need to learn not to mess with their women superheros.</p>","source":"fors","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Ignites A Firestorm By Dissing Scarlett Johansson: How To Damage An Iconic Company Brand In One Move</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Ignites A Firestorm By Dissing Scarlett Johansson: How To Damage An Iconic Company Brand In One Move\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-02 08:43 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviatemin/2021/08/01/disney-ignites-a-firestorm-by-dissing-scarlett-johansson-how-to-damage-an-iconic-company-brand-in-one-move/?sh=4cbc7224208f><strong>Forbes</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Scarlett Johansson attends 26th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards (Photo by Leon Bennett/Getty... [+]\nGETTY IMAGES\nHere are some headlines from late last week:\n‘Black Widow’ Scarlett Johansson Lawsuit...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviatemin/2021/08/01/disney-ignites-a-firestorm-by-dissing-scarlett-johansson-how-to-damage-an-iconic-company-brand-in-one-move/?sh=4cbc7224208f\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼"},"source_url":"https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviatemin/2021/08/01/disney-ignites-a-firestorm-by-dissing-scarlett-johansson-how-to-damage-an-iconic-company-brand-in-one-move/?sh=4cbc7224208f","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196050859","content_text":"Scarlett Johansson attends 26th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards (Photo by Leon Bennett/Getty... [+]\nGETTY IMAGES\nHere are some headlines from late last week:\n‘Black Widow’ Scarlett Johansson Lawsuit: Actress’ Agent Slams Disney For “Direct Attack On Her Character” & Leaving Talent Out Of Streaming Profit Equation—Deadline\nGroups denounce Disney's Scarlett Johansson response as a \"gendered character attack\"—Yahoo\nWomen In Film, ReFrame & Time’s Up Condemn Disney For “Gendered Character Attack” On Scarlett Johansson In Her ‘Black Widow’ Lawsuit—Deadline\nWalt Disney just shocked the industry, movie goers, Marvel fans, Scarlett Johansson lovers, and media watchdogs alike with its unnecessary, nasty response toJohansson’s suit regarding “Black Widow’s” changed distribution plans.\nInstead of taking the high road in their public response to what is essentially a business matter — albeit an important financial one — they decided to go low and go mean.And in so doing not only have they angered industry leaders like Johansson’s agents at CAA, action movie fans, andwomen’s rights advocates, they have seriously put a dent in their reputation with their “un-Disney-like,” off-brand behavior. Nasty, mean-spirited ad hominem attacks are just not what the public expects from Disney, or Marvel. These are supposed to be the good guys, after all.\nDamaging the Disney brand\nDisney: what were you thinking?\nResponding to Johannson’s suit claiming Disney breached her contract regarding the movie’s distribution by deciding to release the movie simultaneously on their streaming service as well as in theaters, then refusing to renegotiate and therefore seriously hurting her total compensation for starring in the blockbuster film that uniquely features two women heroines — Johansson and Florence Pugh — Disney went far beyond the formulaic “This suit is totally without merit, and we look forward to proving that in a court of law.”\nInstead they used their response to demean and shame her in some ways that look pretty sexist to a lot of folks inside and outside the industry.\nSpecifically, they said, as reported in Deadline:\n“The lawsuit is especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the Covid-19 pandemic...” What?\nThen, they went on to reveal for the first time that she is making $20 million already on the film — apparently seeking to shame the actress by — oh my — showing how much money she earns from a blockbuster movie. Really?\nCharacter assassination with sexist overtones\n\nTweet from Women in Film, ReFrame Project, and Time's Up\nDAVIA TEMIN\nIn a move that Time’s Up, Reframe, and Women in Film call “a gendered character attack,”Disney manages to forget the fact that male action superstars like Robert Downey Jr., Ryan Reynolds, Duanne Johnson and Will Smith regularly make $20 to $35 million per movie, with share of box office additional. But I guess women aren’t supposed to be paid like men, still, in Hollywood?\nCAA fights back\nDisney’s highly disparaging statements angered the powerful agents CAA enough that her agent and CAA C0-Chair Bryan Lourd,responded the next daywith\n“I want to address the Walt Disney Company’s statement that was issued in response to the lawsuit filed against them yesterday by our client Scarlett Johansson. They have shamelessly and falsely accused Ms. Johansson of being insensitive to the global COVID pandemic, in an attempt to make her appear to be someone they and I know she isn’t.\n“Scarlett has been Disney’s partner on nine movies, which have earned Disney and its shareholders billions. The company included her salary in their press statement in an attempt to weaponize her success as an artist and businesswoman, as if that were something she should be ashamed of. Scarlett is extremely proud of the work that she, and all of the actors, writers, directors, producers, and the Marvel creative team have been a part of for well over a decade.\n“This suit was filed as a result of Disney’s decision to knowingly violate Scarlett’s contract. They have very deliberately moved the revenue stream and profits to the Disney+ side of the company leaving artistic and financial partners out of their new equation. That’s it, pure and simple.\n“Disney’s direct attack on her character and all else they implied is beneath the company that many of us in the creative community have worked with successfully for decades....”\nBattle of titans in real life\nSo it looks like there’s going to be a battle of titans both on and off the screen. The financial stakes are considerable, of course. It has been reported that Disney’s move could cost Johansson $50 million in share of box office that her contract provides for. And it sets a precedent.\nBut worse, for Disney and the general public, is that Disney felt entitled to go after Johansson — one of their most popular action heroes and one of their only breakthrough female action megastars — by demeaning and shaming her. Do they find this acceptable behavior? Shouldn’t they be supporting their female action heroes, not dissing them?\nSupporting brands by staying on message\nSuits happen all the time — and mostly they are procedural necessities, formulaically handled. But every organization is defined by its public actions as well as by its public statements. This is one reason organizations worry so much about “messaging,” and staying “on message.” Their messages do need to be congruent with their purpose, operating philosophy, reputation, and their general interest in issues beyond the financial — their stakeholders, not only their shareholders.\nDisney’s iconic brand, carefully forged for decades, has usually been of wholesomeness, family values, and being on the side of the good guys. If they think that by going so seriously against their core brand, and by being snide and manipulative about Johansson’s compensation, they are going to curry favor with the public, they have sorely misjudged the situation. We’re talking about equity here, as well as gender equality. And core values.\nBy underestimating the response of key audiences to their attack-dog tactics to what is a reasonable objection and law suit, they have harmed their own reputation. It is not yet clear how badly.\nBut it is probably time for Disney the company to be doing some serious reevaluation of their public, and private, postures regarding fairness, equity, and gender equality. And about living up to their own brand promise.\nAnd, perhaps, they need to learn not to mess with their women superheros.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1056,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":805888307,"gmtCreate":1627869891209,"gmtModify":1633755765360,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will it rise? ","listText":"Will it rise? ","text":"Will it rise?","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25e0dd281009348c925b99d4ee025ce1","width":"1125","height":"2584"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/805888307","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":237,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":158515991,"gmtCreate":1625155515113,"gmtModify":1633944148353,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[强] [强] ","listText":"[强] [强] ","text":"[强] [强]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/158515991","repostId":"1199212665","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199212665","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625146084,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199212665?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-01 21:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Expensive Tech Stocks to Buy in the Next Market Crash","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199212665","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Get ready to buy Snowflake and two other hot tech stocks if this frothy market collapses.","content":"<p>Many high-growth tech stocks have seen price pullbacks over the past few months, due to concerns about higher bond yields, inflation, and decelerating growth for companies that benefited from the pandemic.</p>\n<p>That sell-off created some buying opportunities -- but some of the sector's pricier names merely pulled back slightly, held onto their gains, or even rallied. That relative strength is admirable, but it's a bit frustrating for investors who don't want to pay the wrong price for the right company.</p>\n<p>That's why I'm making a shopping list of expensive tech stocks which I'd eagerly buy during the next market crash. Let's take a look at three of those companies:<b>Snowflake</b>(NYSE:SNOW),<b>Twilio</b>(NYSE:TWLO), and <b>CrowdStrike</b>(NASDAQ:CRWD).</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fde232ce39d9cd52a01fd6ec018cae53\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p>\n<p><b>1. Snowflake</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake was one of the hottest tech IPOs of 2020, thanks to its jaw-dropping growth rates and big investments from <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> and <b>salesforce.com</b>.</p>\n<p>Snowflake'scloud-baseddata warehouse pulls all of a company's data onto a single platform, where it can then be fed into third-party data visualization apps. Its service breaks down the silos between different departments and computing platforms, which makes it easier for large companies to make data-driven decisions.</p>\n<p>Snowflake's number of customers jumped 73% to 4,139 in fiscal 2021 (which ended this January), including 186 of the Fortune 500 companies. Its revenue surged 124% to $592 million, as its net retention rate -- which gauges its year-over-year revenue growth per existing customer -- hit 165%.</p>\n<p>That growth continued in the first quarter of 2022. Its revenue rose 110% year over year to $228.9 million, its number of customers increased 67% to 4,532, and it achieved a net retention rate of 168%.</p>\n<p>But Snowflake isn't profitable yet. ItsGAAPnet loss widened from $348.5 million in fiscal 2020 to $539.1 million in fiscal 2021, and<i>more than doubled</i>from $93.6 million to $203.2 million in the first quarter of 2022. It's also unprofitable on a non-GAAP basis, which excludes its stock-based compensation expenses.</p>\n<p>Analysts expect Snowflake's revenue to rise 88% this year, with a narrower loss. However, its stock still trades at 65 times this year's sales -- which indicates there's still far too much growth baked into the stock. But if Snowflake gets cut in half in a crash, I'd considerstarting a big position.</p>\n<p><b>2. Twilio</b></p>\n<p>Twilio's cloud platform processes text messages, calls, and videos within apps. For example, it helps <b>Lyft</b>'s passengers contact their drivers, and <b>Airbnb</b>'s guests reach their hosts.</p>\n<p>In the past, developers built those tools from scratch, which was generally time-consuming, buggy, and difficult to scale. However, developers can now outsource those features to Twilio's cloud service by simply adding a few lines of code to their apps.</p>\n<p>Twilio's revenue rose 55% to $1.76 billion in 2020. Its net expansion rate, which is comparable to Snowflake's net retention rate, reached 137%. In the first quarter of 2021, its revenue jumped 62% year over year to $590 million as it integrated its recent purchase of the customer data firm Segment.</p>\n<p>Twilio remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis, but its non-GAAP net income rose 62% to $35.9 million in 2020. In the first quarter of 2021, its non-GAAP net income rose another 15% to $9.6 million.</p>\n<p>Analysts expect its revenue to rise 44% this year, but for its non-GAAP earnings to dip into the red again amid higher investments and rising A2P (application-to-person) fees, which are now charged by carriers whenever an app accesses an SMS network.</p>\n<p>That near-term outlook doesn't look great for a stock that trades at nearly 30 times this year's sales. However, I still think Twilio has great growth potential, and I'd definitely buy its stock at a lower price.</p>\n<p><b>3. CrowdStrike</b></p>\n<p>CrowdStrike is a cybersecurity company that differs from its industry peers in one major way. Most cybersecurity companies install on-site appliances to support their services, which can be expensive to maintain and difficult to scale as an organization expands. CrowdStrike eliminates those appliances by offering its end-to-end security platform as a cloud-based service.</p>\n<p>CrowdStrike's growth clearly reflects its disruptive potential. Its revenue rose 82% to $874.4 million in fiscal 2021 (which ended this January), its number of subscription customers increased 82% to 9,896, and its net retention rate stayed above 120%.</p>\n<p>In the first quarter of fiscal 2022, its revenue rose 70% year over year to $302.8 million, its subscriber base expanded 82% year over year to 11,420, and it kept its retention rate above 120%.</p>\n<p>CrowdStrike also turned profitable on a non-GAAP basis in 2021, with a net profit of $62.6 million. Its non-GAAP net income rose more than fivefold year over year to $23.3 million in the first quarter of 2022.</p>\n<p>Those numbers are impressive, but CrowdStrike still trades at about 350 times forward earnings and more than 40 times this year's sales. Therefore, this is another stock I won't buy unless the market crashes.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Expensive Tech Stocks to Buy in the Next Market Crash</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Expensive Tech Stocks to Buy in the Next Market Crash\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-01 21:28 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/01/expensive-tech-stocks-to-buy-in-next-market-crash/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many high-growth tech stocks have seen price pullbacks over the past few months, due to concerns about higher bond yields, inflation, and decelerating growth for companies that benefited from the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/01/expensive-tech-stocks-to-buy-in-next-market-crash/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/01/expensive-tech-stocks-to-buy-in-next-market-crash/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199212665","content_text":"Many high-growth tech stocks have seen price pullbacks over the past few months, due to concerns about higher bond yields, inflation, and decelerating growth for companies that benefited from the pandemic.\nThat sell-off created some buying opportunities -- but some of the sector's pricier names merely pulled back slightly, held onto their gains, or even rallied. That relative strength is admirable, but it's a bit frustrating for investors who don't want to pay the wrong price for the right company.\nThat's why I'm making a shopping list of expensive tech stocks which I'd eagerly buy during the next market crash. Let's take a look at three of those companies:Snowflake(NYSE:SNOW),Twilio(NYSE:TWLO), and CrowdStrike(NASDAQ:CRWD).\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\n1. Snowflake\nSnowflake was one of the hottest tech IPOs of 2020, thanks to its jaw-dropping growth rates and big investments from Berkshire Hathaway and salesforce.com.\nSnowflake'scloud-baseddata warehouse pulls all of a company's data onto a single platform, where it can then be fed into third-party data visualization apps. Its service breaks down the silos between different departments and computing platforms, which makes it easier for large companies to make data-driven decisions.\nSnowflake's number of customers jumped 73% to 4,139 in fiscal 2021 (which ended this January), including 186 of the Fortune 500 companies. Its revenue surged 124% to $592 million, as its net retention rate -- which gauges its year-over-year revenue growth per existing customer -- hit 165%.\nThat growth continued in the first quarter of 2022. Its revenue rose 110% year over year to $228.9 million, its number of customers increased 67% to 4,532, and it achieved a net retention rate of 168%.\nBut Snowflake isn't profitable yet. ItsGAAPnet loss widened from $348.5 million in fiscal 2020 to $539.1 million in fiscal 2021, andmore than doubledfrom $93.6 million to $203.2 million in the first quarter of 2022. It's also unprofitable on a non-GAAP basis, which excludes its stock-based compensation expenses.\nAnalysts expect Snowflake's revenue to rise 88% this year, with a narrower loss. However, its stock still trades at 65 times this year's sales -- which indicates there's still far too much growth baked into the stock. But if Snowflake gets cut in half in a crash, I'd considerstarting a big position.\n2. Twilio\nTwilio's cloud platform processes text messages, calls, and videos within apps. For example, it helps Lyft's passengers contact their drivers, and Airbnb's guests reach their hosts.\nIn the past, developers built those tools from scratch, which was generally time-consuming, buggy, and difficult to scale. However, developers can now outsource those features to Twilio's cloud service by simply adding a few lines of code to their apps.\nTwilio's revenue rose 55% to $1.76 billion in 2020. Its net expansion rate, which is comparable to Snowflake's net retention rate, reached 137%. In the first quarter of 2021, its revenue jumped 62% year over year to $590 million as it integrated its recent purchase of the customer data firm Segment.\nTwilio remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis, but its non-GAAP net income rose 62% to $35.9 million in 2020. In the first quarter of 2021, its non-GAAP net income rose another 15% to $9.6 million.\nAnalysts expect its revenue to rise 44% this year, but for its non-GAAP earnings to dip into the red again amid higher investments and rising A2P (application-to-person) fees, which are now charged by carriers whenever an app accesses an SMS network.\nThat near-term outlook doesn't look great for a stock that trades at nearly 30 times this year's sales. However, I still think Twilio has great growth potential, and I'd definitely buy its stock at a lower price.\n3. CrowdStrike\nCrowdStrike is a cybersecurity company that differs from its industry peers in one major way. Most cybersecurity companies install on-site appliances to support their services, which can be expensive to maintain and difficult to scale as an organization expands. CrowdStrike eliminates those appliances by offering its end-to-end security platform as a cloud-based service.\nCrowdStrike's growth clearly reflects its disruptive potential. Its revenue rose 82% to $874.4 million in fiscal 2021 (which ended this January), its number of subscription customers increased 82% to 9,896, and its net retention rate stayed above 120%.\nIn the first quarter of fiscal 2022, its revenue rose 70% year over year to $302.8 million, its subscriber base expanded 82% year over year to 11,420, and it kept its retention rate above 120%.\nCrowdStrike also turned profitable on a non-GAAP basis in 2021, with a net profit of $62.6 million. Its non-GAAP net income rose more than fivefold year over year to $23.3 million in the first quarter of 2022.\nThose numbers are impressive, but CrowdStrike still trades at about 350 times forward earnings and more than 40 times this year's sales. Therefore, this is another stock I won't buy unless the market crashes.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CRWD":0.9,"SNOW":0.9,"TWLO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":887,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":151631140,"gmtCreate":1625078310480,"gmtModify":1633945072362,"author":{"id":"3552790388588156","authorId":"3552790388588156","name":"AMeow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7469f72b779995e421e80123836cd83","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3552790388588156","authorIdStr":"3552790388588156"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/151631140","repostId":"2148881060","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":439,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}