个人中心 - 老虎社区

TheHaq

Growth and Long term investing

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 140帖子 · 140
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-08-22
  Interesting article from real investment
  Did The Fed's Monetary Policy Experiment Just Fail?
  Did the Fed’s “monetary policy experiment” fail? The recent dislocation between consumer confidence
  Did The Fed's Monetary Policy Experiment Just Fail?
  1,415 评论
  3
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-08-17
  Long time hold
  807 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-08-17
  China stocks gonna be down for a long time
  China tech stocks lower as nation issues draft competition rules
  The Hang Seng Tech Index dropped as much as 3%, as China’s market regulator released draft rules ban
  China tech stocks lower as nation issues draft competition rules
  1,950 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-08-11
  Printer go brrrr
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,127 评论
  3
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-08-03
  Hopefully the stock market keeps on climbing
  883 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-08-03
  Nio will soon be the leader
  EV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing
  Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing Li Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shar
  EV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing
  1,259 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-07-31
  Avoid this stock
  1,378 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-07-31
  Good
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,026 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-07-29
  $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Come on PLTR
  1,010 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- TheHaqTheHaq
  ·2021-07-28
  Apple is a must
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  977 1
  3
  分享
  举报

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3572622102225035","uuid":"3572622102225035","gmtCreate":1609528079048,"gmtModify":1626850027304,"name":"TheHaq","pinyin":"thehaq","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"Growth and Long term investing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":8,"headSize":82,"tweetSize":140,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":2,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.12.31","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.12.31","exceedPercentage":"60.67%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.18","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":832852651,"gmtCreate":1629610191073,"gmtModify":1631890063692,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting article from real investment&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting article from real investment&nbsp;","text":"Interesting article from real investment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832852651","repostId":"1102227761","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102227761","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629471126,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1102227761?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-20 22:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Did The Fed's Monetary Policy Experiment Just Fail?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102227761","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Did the Fed’s “monetary policy experiment” fail? The recent dislocation between consumer confidence ","content":"<p>Did the Fed’s “monetary policy experiment” fail? The recent dislocation between consumer confidence and the financial markets may indicate just that.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>“U.S. consumer sentiment dropped sharply in early August to its lowest level in a decade, in a worrying sign for the economy as Americans gave faltering outlooks on everything from personal finances to inflation and employment,” – Reuters</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>However, to understand why I am asking the question, we have to revisit what<b><i>Ben Bernanke said in 2010</i></b>&nbsp;to support the idea of a second round of<i>&nbsp;“Quantitative Easing.”</i></p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“This approach eased financial conditions in the past and, so far, looks to be effective again. Stock prices rose, and long-term interest rates fell when investors began to anticipate the most recent action.</b></i>\n <i>&nbsp;Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment.&nbsp;</i>\n <i><b>And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending.”</b></i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>What he is referring to is known as&nbsp;<b><i>“Animal Spirits.”</i></b></p>\n<p>Animal spirits came from the Latin term “<i>spiritus animals,”</i>&nbsp;which means the&nbsp;<b><i>“breath that awakens the human mind.”</i></b>Its modern usage came about in John Maynard Keynes’ 1936 publication, “<i>The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.”</i><b>Ultimately, “animal spirits was adopted by Wall Street to describe the psychological factors driving investor actions.</b></p>\n<p>Specifically, Ben Bernanke realized that investors would respond to that stimulus and increase asset prices by providing accommodation.</p>\n<p>In other words, as long as individuals&nbsp;<i>“believe”</i>&nbsp;the Fed is lifting asset prices higher, they take action buying stocks and driving asset prices higher.<b>&nbsp;Thus, investor actions deliver the desired outcome.</b></p>\n<p><b>It Was All Going According To Plan</b></p>\n<p>Since the Fed began its monetary interventions, the correlation between the asset prices and confidence remains high.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/210d14dd122881846ea4226effb170ea\" tg-width=\"821\" tg-height=\"453\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">As noted, the entire premise of monetary policy was to spur consumer spending. Everything seemed to be according to plan.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a31f98451c5ad7cde0311565779e07d4\" tg-width=\"806\" tg-height=\"519\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>The problem was that while the Fed lifted asset prices, the economy didn’t strengthen as expected. As discussed recently:</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>“However, while the Federal Reserve got the desired outcome of increasing asset prices,&nbsp;“quantitative easing”&nbsp;failed to&nbsp;“trickle down.”&nbsp;</i>\n <i><b>Despite the massive expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet and the surge in asset prices, there was relatively little translation into wages, full-time employment, or corporate profits after tax which ultimately triggered very little economic growth.</b></i>\n <i>“</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/923d35054ec8eb34d9d199db7ba16dff\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"731\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i><b>“Since 2007, the stock market returned nearly 200%, which is more than twice the growth in GDP and nearly 4-times the growth in corporate revenue.</b></i><i>(I use SALES growth as it happens at the top line of income statements and is not subject to as much manipulation.)”</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d910672559685cf118f6432ec179f623\" tg-width=\"816\" tg-height=\"460\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Again, it was all going according to plan, sort of.</p>\n<p>Until now.</p>\n<p>Did The Monetary Policy Experiment Just Fail?</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Over the past half century, the Sentiment Index has only recorded larger losses in six other surveys, all connected to sudden negative changes in the economy,”</b></i>\n <i>&nbsp;Richard Curtin, chief economist for the University of Michigan’s Surveys of Consumers, said in a release.&nbsp;</i>\n <i><b>Two of those larger month-over-month movers were April 2020 amid the pandemic and October 2008, during the financial crisis.”</b></i>\n <i>&nbsp;– CNBC</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>The decline was extremely sharp.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>“Not only was the release dramatically worse than the last update, but it was a huge miss relative to expectations.&nbsp;Today’s release came in 11 points below expectations.&nbsp;The only other month going back to 1999 that even comes close was a 9.9 point miss in February 2004.”</i>&nbsp;–&nbsp;\n <i>Bespoke Investment Group</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48d9e9971844a0831e2d30ca9b39ccf1\" tg-width=\"643\" tg-height=\"446\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>The mainstream analysis missed that the correlation between confidence and markets broke down in 2019. Notably, while the Fed is engaged in monetizing $120 billion in debt monthly, higher asset prices isn’t inflating confidence.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c81d4d0c3d54051c8dcbb6f97c1132c\" tg-width=\"817\" tg-height=\"449\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>That breakdown of consumer confidence will likely show up in consumption in the coming quarter. Such is mainly due to stimulus and other financial supports fading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b4f7d9af8367c18d35e786425f006f9\" tg-width=\"805\" tg-height=\"521\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>A decent warning sign such may be the case was the weak retail sales report this past week. The large gap between retail sales and employment will likely get filled sooner than expected and not necessarily by higher employment.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa41872f9faf9a53e0b2b8c568860dc6\" tg-width=\"1009\" tg-height=\"557\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">If the most giant&nbsp;<i>“monetary policy experiment”</i>&nbsp;just failed, the Fed has an enormous problem.</p>\n<p><b>The Problem For The Fed</b></p>\n<p>Over the next couple of weeks, all eyes are on the Fed. Lately, there has been an abundance of communication from Fed members discussing the need to&nbsp;<i>“taper”</i>&nbsp;its monetary interventions.</p>\n<p>As Morgan Stanley recently noted:</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>“If the July FOMC minutes suggest that there was strong consensus and Chair Powell’s indication on tapering at Jackson Hole is therefore much firmer, we could see that as consistent with the FOMC gearing up to move on tapering sooner.”</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Such is something the markets are probably not ready for.</p>\n<p>So far, market participants have ignored weakening economic data, the collapse of Afghanistan, and rising risks of infections across the U.S.&nbsp;<b>As long as the Fed is engaged in providing liquidity, the&nbsp;</b><b><i>“risk of missing out”</i></b><b>&nbsp;outweighs being more conservative with allocations.</b></p>\n<p>However, the Fed remains trapped between two very tough policy choices.</p>\n<p><b>The system has elevated inflation levels, as indicated by the spread between the PPI and CPI inflation measures.</b>Currently, with PPI at the highest spread to CPI in history, it suggests producers can’t pass on costs to customers.&nbsp;<b>Such equates to weaker profit margins and earnings in the future.</b>However, if they elect to pass those costs onto consumers, such will raise living costs well above wages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbb6d94a3f3346f37f7cfb8fe9fcbf80\" tg-width=\"966\" tg-height=\"514\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">With unemployment levels dropping, and inflation rising, the Fed should be tapering monetary policy.</p>\n<p>However, the reduction in liquidity will trigger a decline in asset prices, hinder consumer confidence, and contract economic growth further.</p>\n<p>It’s a tough choice.</p>\n<p><b>Conclusion</b></p>\n<p>We agree with Morgan Stanley’s assessment on the likely path of “taper” when it comes.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>“</i>\n <i><b>The path of least resistance is to follow the path most traveled, that is, the playbook established in the last cycle when the Fed began to reduce its purchases of longer-term assets following the 2013 taper tantrum.</b></i>\n <i>&nbsp;That playbook included a long lead-time to signal the start, a promise that tapering would be gradual and flexible,</i>\n <i><b>&nbsp;and assurances to the market that tapering would have nothing to do with the timing of first rate hike.</b></i>\n <i>&nbsp;Indeed, the Fed did not first raise rates until six months following the end of tapering.”</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>While such is undoubtedly the path of least resistance, it is unlikely the market will like it much. As discussed in<b>&nbsp;</b><b><i>“3-Signs Of The Next Bear Market:”</i></b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>“Therefore, it should also not be surprising that when the Fed starts&nbsp;‘tapering’&nbsp;their bond purchases, the market tends to witness increased volatility. The grey shaded bars in the chart below show when the balance sheet is either flat or contracting.”</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3897c4cb768c4b4b960e6bc88b8444fe\" tg-width=\"962\" tg-height=\"563\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Notably, the time from the initial tapering of assets and a market correction is almost immediate.</p>\n<p>If&nbsp;<i>“monetary policy”</i>&nbsp;has lost effectiveness in supporting consumer confidence and “animal spirits,” the significant risk to investors could be a market decline the Fed cannot halt.</p>\n<p>Currently, investors are highly confident the Fed can support markets against any risk.</p>\n<p>But what if they can’t?</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Did The Fed's Monetary Policy Experiment Just Fail?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDid The Fed's Monetary Policy Experiment Just Fail?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-20 22:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/did-feds-monetary-policy-experiment-just-fail><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Did the Fed’s “monetary policy experiment” fail? The recent dislocation between consumer confidence and the financial markets may indicate just that.\n\n“U.S. consumer sentiment dropped sharply in early...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/did-feds-monetary-policy-experiment-just-fail\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/did-feds-monetary-policy-experiment-just-fail","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102227761","content_text":"Did the Fed’s “monetary policy experiment” fail? The recent dislocation between consumer confidence and the financial markets may indicate just that.\n\n“U.S. consumer sentiment dropped sharply in early August to its lowest level in a decade, in a worrying sign for the economy as Americans gave faltering outlooks on everything from personal finances to inflation and employment,” – Reuters\n\nHowever, to understand why I am asking the question, we have to revisit whatBen Bernanke said in 2010 to support the idea of a second round of “Quantitative Easing.”\n\n“This approach eased financial conditions in the past and, so far, looks to be effective again. Stock prices rose, and long-term interest rates fell when investors began to anticipate the most recent action.\n Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. \nAnd higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending.”\n\nWhat he is referring to is known as “Animal Spirits.”\nAnimal spirits came from the Latin term “spiritus animals,” which means the “breath that awakens the human mind.”Its modern usage came about in John Maynard Keynes’ 1936 publication, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.”Ultimately, “animal spirits was adopted by Wall Street to describe the psychological factors driving investor actions.\nSpecifically, Ben Bernanke realized that investors would respond to that stimulus and increase asset prices by providing accommodation.\nIn other words, as long as individuals “believe” the Fed is lifting asset prices higher, they take action buying stocks and driving asset prices higher. Thus, investor actions deliver the desired outcome.\nIt Was All Going According To Plan\nSince the Fed began its monetary interventions, the correlation between the asset prices and confidence remains high.\nAs noted, the entire premise of monetary policy was to spur consumer spending. Everything seemed to be according to plan.\n\nThe problem was that while the Fed lifted asset prices, the economy didn’t strengthen as expected. As discussed recently:\n\n“However, while the Federal Reserve got the desired outcome of increasing asset prices, “quantitative easing” failed to “trickle down.” \nDespite the massive expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet and the surge in asset prices, there was relatively little translation into wages, full-time employment, or corporate profits after tax which ultimately triggered very little economic growth.\n“\n\n“Since 2007, the stock market returned nearly 200%, which is more than twice the growth in GDP and nearly 4-times the growth in corporate revenue.(I use SALES growth as it happens at the top line of income statements and is not subject to as much manipulation.)”\nAgain, it was all going according to plan, sort of.\nUntil now.\nDid The Monetary Policy Experiment Just Fail?\n\n“Over the past half century, the Sentiment Index has only recorded larger losses in six other surveys, all connected to sudden negative changes in the economy,”\n Richard Curtin, chief economist for the University of Michigan’s Surveys of Consumers, said in a release. \nTwo of those larger month-over-month movers were April 2020 amid the pandemic and October 2008, during the financial crisis.”\n – CNBC\n\nThe decline was extremely sharp.\n\n“Not only was the release dramatically worse than the last update, but it was a huge miss relative to expectations. Today’s release came in 11 points below expectations. The only other month going back to 1999 that even comes close was a 9.9 point miss in February 2004.” – \n Bespoke Investment Group\n\n\nThe mainstream analysis missed that the correlation between confidence and markets broke down in 2019. Notably, while the Fed is engaged in monetizing $120 billion in debt monthly, higher asset prices isn’t inflating confidence.\n\nThat breakdown of consumer confidence will likely show up in consumption in the coming quarter. Such is mainly due to stimulus and other financial supports fading.\n\nA decent warning sign such may be the case was the weak retail sales report this past week. The large gap between retail sales and employment will likely get filled sooner than expected and not necessarily by higher employment.\nIf the most giant “monetary policy experiment” just failed, the Fed has an enormous problem.\nThe Problem For The Fed\nOver the next couple of weeks, all eyes are on the Fed. Lately, there has been an abundance of communication from Fed members discussing the need to “taper” its monetary interventions.\nAs Morgan Stanley recently noted:\n\n“If the July FOMC minutes suggest that there was strong consensus and Chair Powell’s indication on tapering at Jackson Hole is therefore much firmer, we could see that as consistent with the FOMC gearing up to move on tapering sooner.”\n\nSuch is something the markets are probably not ready for.\nSo far, market participants have ignored weakening economic data, the collapse of Afghanistan, and rising risks of infections across the U.S. As long as the Fed is engaged in providing liquidity, the “risk of missing out” outweighs being more conservative with allocations.\nHowever, the Fed remains trapped between two very tough policy choices.\nThe system has elevated inflation levels, as indicated by the spread between the PPI and CPI inflation measures.Currently, with PPI at the highest spread to CPI in history, it suggests producers can’t pass on costs to customers. Such equates to weaker profit margins and earnings in the future.However, if they elect to pass those costs onto consumers, such will raise living costs well above wages.\nWith unemployment levels dropping, and inflation rising, the Fed should be tapering monetary policy.\nHowever, the reduction in liquidity will trigger a decline in asset prices, hinder consumer confidence, and contract economic growth further.\nIt’s a tough choice.\nConclusion\nWe agree with Morgan Stanley’s assessment on the likely path of “taper” when it comes.\n\n“\nThe path of least resistance is to follow the path most traveled, that is, the playbook established in the last cycle when the Fed began to reduce its purchases of longer-term assets following the 2013 taper tantrum.\n That playbook included a long lead-time to signal the start, a promise that tapering would be gradual and flexible,\n and assurances to the market that tapering would have nothing to do with the timing of first rate hike.\n Indeed, the Fed did not first raise rates until six months following the end of tapering.”\n\nWhile such is undoubtedly the path of least resistance, it is unlikely the market will like it much. As discussed in “3-Signs Of The Next Bear Market:”\n\n“Therefore, it should also not be surprising that when the Fed starts ‘tapering’ their bond purchases, the market tends to witness increased volatility. The grey shaded bars in the chart below show when the balance sheet is either flat or contracting.”\n\nNotably, the time from the initial tapering of assets and a market correction is almost immediate.\nIf “monetary policy” has lost effectiveness in supporting consumer confidence and “animal spirits,” the significant risk to investors could be a market decline the Fed cannot halt.\nCurrently, investors are highly confident the Fed can support markets against any risk.\nBut what if they can’t?","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1415,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839757092,"gmtCreate":1629184725116,"gmtModify":1631890063698,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Long time hold","listText":"Long time hold","text":"Long time hold","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4e2150ef680ec9cd0437d69d39b320","width":"1125","height":"3463"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839757092","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":807,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839755991,"gmtCreate":1629184574713,"gmtModify":1631884235383,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"China stocks gonna be down for a long&nbsp; time&nbsp;","listText":"China stocks gonna be down for a long&nbsp; time&nbsp;","text":"China stocks gonna be down for a long time","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839755991","repostId":"1147138826","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147138826","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629179191,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147138826?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-17 13:46","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"China tech stocks lower as nation issues draft competition rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147138826","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"The Hang Seng Tech Index dropped as much as 3%, as China’s market regulator released draft rules ban","content":"<p>The Hang Seng Tech Index dropped as much as 3%, as China’s market regulator&nbsp;released&nbsp;draft rules banning unfair competition among the nation’s online platform operators.</p>\n<p>Baidu Inc.&nbsp;and&nbsp;NetEase Inc.&nbsp;slumped as much as 5% while&nbsp;Tencent Holdings Ltd.&nbsp;and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. slid more than 4%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/941afd804b1d8567636a57f81beca1e6\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The wide-ranging proposals released Tuesday come after the tech-industry ministry launched a campaign last month aimed at rooting out a raft of&nbsp;problematic&nbsp;behavior.</p>\n<p>The draft covers protections for intellectual property and brand reputation as well as a ban against using algorithms or fake reviews to promote goods and services. Alongside expressly prohibited behaviors like forced exclusivity arrangements, companies will also not be permitted to use technical means to interfere with the operations of rival platforms or maliciously render those services incompatible with their own.</p>\n<p>The latter could force giants like Tencent and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. to dismantle their walled-off ecosystems that had prevented users from accessing one company’s services from the other’s platforms. Alibaba Chief Executive Officer Daniel Zhang earlier this month signaled support for the removal of those barriers, saying that he saw “cross-platform openness and connectivity as a positive trend.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China tech stocks lower as nation issues draft competition rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina tech stocks lower as nation issues draft competition rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-17 13:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-17/technology-stocks-fall-as-china-issues-draft-competition-rules?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Hang Seng Tech Index dropped as much as 3%, as China’s market regulator released draft rules banning unfair competition among the nation’s online platform operators.\nBaidu Inc. and NetEase Inc. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-17/technology-stocks-fall-as-china-issues-draft-competition-rules?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-17/technology-stocks-fall-as-china-issues-draft-competition-rules?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147138826","content_text":"The Hang Seng Tech Index dropped as much as 3%, as China’s market regulator released draft rules banning unfair competition among the nation’s online platform operators.\nBaidu Inc. and NetEase Inc. slumped as much as 5% while Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. slid more than 4%.\n\nThe wide-ranging proposals released Tuesday come after the tech-industry ministry launched a campaign last month aimed at rooting out a raft of problematic behavior.\nThe draft covers protections for intellectual property and brand reputation as well as a ban against using algorithms or fake reviews to promote goods and services. Alongside expressly prohibited behaviors like forced exclusivity arrangements, companies will also not be permitted to use technical means to interfere with the operations of rival platforms or maliciously render those services incompatible with their own.\nThe latter could force giants like Tencent and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. to dismantle their walled-off ecosystems that had prevented users from accessing one company’s services from the other’s platforms. Alibaba Chief Executive Officer Daniel Zhang earlier this month signaled support for the removal of those barriers, saying that he saw “cross-platform openness and connectivity as a positive trend.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"00700":0.9,"09618":0.9,"09988":0.9,"09999":0.9,"HSTECH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1950,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892615809,"gmtCreate":1628654441801,"gmtModify":1631890063702,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Printer go brrrr","listText":"Printer go brrrr","text":"Printer go brrrr","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892615809","repostId":"1185123318","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807036847,"gmtCreate":1627988072189,"gmtModify":1631890063701,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hopefully the stock market keeps on climbing","listText":"Hopefully the stock market keeps on climbing","text":"Hopefully the stock market keeps on climbing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807036847","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":883,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807031625,"gmtCreate":1627987895367,"gmtModify":1631890063707,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nio will soon be the leader","listText":"Nio will soon be the leader","text":"Nio will soon be the leader","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807031625","repostId":"2156117308","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2156117308","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627943866,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2156117308?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-03 06:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2156117308","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing\nLi Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shar","content":"<ul>\n <li>Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing</li>\n <li>Li Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shares in Hong Kong</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Electric vehicle maker Li Auto Inc. is looking to raise as much as HK$15 billion ($1.9 billion) in its Hong Kong listing.The Beijing-based firm is offering 100 million shares for as much as HK$150 each, according to a statement.</p>\n<p>The offering is being split into 10 million shares for Hong Kong retailers and the rest for international investors, whose shares could be priced higher, Li Auto said in the statement.</p>\n<p>Li Auto is following in the footsteps of larger rival XPeng Inc., which raised $1.8 billion in a dual primary listing in the city in June. U.S.-traded Chinese companies are pivoting to so-called homecoming listings in Hong Kong as a way to hedge against the risk of being delisted from American exchanges as well as broadening their investor base.</p>\n<p>Li Auto shares are down 2.9% since the beginning of July, giving the company a market value of about $30 billion. The shares fell about 2.5% in late trading Monday. XPeng is currently trading little changed from its offer price in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>Like XPeng, Li Auto’s listing will be dual primary. The EV firms aren’t eligible for the waiver that some greater China-based companies use to seek a secondary listing, as they don’t have a track record of at least two years’ trading on another exchange.</p>\n<p>Li Auto raised $1.3 billion in its U.S. initial public offering a year ago. Its shares have risen 193% from its offer price as part of a global rally in EV stocks.</p>\n<p>The carmaker is still loss-making, recording a net loss of $54.9 million in the first three months of this year on revenues of $546 million, its prospectus shows.</p>\n<p>It plans to set the final price for the listing Aug. 6 and trading is slated to begin Aug. 12, according to a filing to Hong Kong stock exchange.</p>\n<p>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and China International Capital Corp. are joint sponsors for Li Auto’s Hong Kong listing, while UBS Group AG is the financial adviser.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-03 06:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-02/ev-maker-li-auto-seeks-1-9-billion-in-hong-kong-listing><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing\nLi Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shares in Hong Kong\n\nElectric vehicle maker Li Auto Inc. is looking to raise as much as HK$15 billion ($...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-02/ev-maker-li-auto-seeks-1-9-billion-in-hong-kong-listing\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-02/ev-maker-li-auto-seeks-1-9-billion-in-hong-kong-listing","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2156117308","content_text":"Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing\nLi Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shares in Hong Kong\n\nElectric vehicle maker Li Auto Inc. is looking to raise as much as HK$15 billion ($1.9 billion) in its Hong Kong listing.The Beijing-based firm is offering 100 million shares for as much as HK$150 each, according to a statement.\nThe offering is being split into 10 million shares for Hong Kong retailers and the rest for international investors, whose shares could be priced higher, Li Auto said in the statement.\nLi Auto is following in the footsteps of larger rival XPeng Inc., which raised $1.8 billion in a dual primary listing in the city in June. U.S.-traded Chinese companies are pivoting to so-called homecoming listings in Hong Kong as a way to hedge against the risk of being delisted from American exchanges as well as broadening their investor base.\nLi Auto shares are down 2.9% since the beginning of July, giving the company a market value of about $30 billion. The shares fell about 2.5% in late trading Monday. XPeng is currently trading little changed from its offer price in Hong Kong.\nLike XPeng, Li Auto’s listing will be dual primary. The EV firms aren’t eligible for the waiver that some greater China-based companies use to seek a secondary listing, as they don’t have a track record of at least two years’ trading on another exchange.\nLi Auto raised $1.3 billion in its U.S. initial public offering a year ago. Its shares have risen 193% from its offer price as part of a global rally in EV stocks.\nThe carmaker is still loss-making, recording a net loss of $54.9 million in the first three months of this year on revenues of $546 million, its prospectus shows.\nIt plans to set the final price for the listing Aug. 6 and trading is slated to begin Aug. 12, according to a filing to Hong Kong stock exchange.\nGoldman Sachs Group Inc. and China International Capital Corp. are joint sponsors for Li Auto’s Hong Kong listing, while UBS Group AG is the financial adviser.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LI":0.9,"XPEV":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1259,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802105422,"gmtCreate":1627727218966,"gmtModify":1631890063712,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Avoid this stock","listText":"Avoid this stock","text":"Avoid this stock","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5238b640c7704d9a2b036e446b8729ea","width":"1125","height":"3305"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802105422","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1378,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802102706,"gmtCreate":1627727047405,"gmtModify":1631890063717,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802102706","repostId":"1121501806","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1026,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801782785,"gmtCreate":1627535264647,"gmtModify":1631890063717,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Come on PLTR","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Come on PLTR","text":"$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Come on PLTR","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/100450c2449a12b1a6ce43191e3f26d3","width":"1284","height":"2223"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801782785","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1010,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803743232,"gmtCreate":1627467707126,"gmtModify":1631890063721,"author":{"id":"3572622102225035","authorId":"3572622102225035","name":"TheHaq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa8f425ae08e71ad8583df23f2813d71","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572622102225035","authorIdStr":"3572622102225035"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple is a must","listText":"Apple is a must","text":"Apple is a must","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/803743232","repostId":"2154405999","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":977,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}