社区
首页
集团介绍
社区
资讯
行情
学堂
TigerAI
登录
注册
Buffet97
IP属地：未知
+关注
帖子 · 37
帖子 · 37
关注 · 0
关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0
粉丝 · 0
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2022-02-06
I c
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
1,424
回复
评论
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2022-02-06
Cool
Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create "TelevisaUnivision", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company
Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers ever
Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create "TelevisaUnivision", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company
看
1,581
回复
评论
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2022-02-01
Insightful
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
2,273
回复
评论
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2022-02-01
Wow
Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create "TelevisaUnivision", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company
Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers ever
Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create "TelevisaUnivision", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company
看
1,657
回复
评论
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2021-07-28
//
@Buffet97
:I see
'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) LONDON, July 16 (Reu
'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan
看
1,001
回复
评论
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2021-07-16
I see
'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) LONDON, July 16 (Reu
'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan
看
1,435
回复
1
点赞
6
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2021-06-17
Wow
At Home Group accepts Hellman & Friedman's raised offer
June 16 (Reuters) - At Home Group Inc accepted a raised cash offer of $37 per share from private-equ
At Home Group accepts Hellman & Friedman's raised offer
看
841
回复
评论
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2021-05-11
Oh
London copper rises as traders bet on bullish demand outlook
HANOI, May 11 (Reuters) - London copper prices climbed on Tuesday, as traders bet on demand prospect
London copper rises as traders bet on bullish demand outlook
看
774
回复
2
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2021-05-10
Ok
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
972
回复
评论
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
Buffet97
Buffet97
·
2021-04-22
Good
Why Square And Cathie Wood's Ark See Bitcoin Environmental Concerns As Unfounded
Cathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management and digital payment company Square Inc.(NYSE:SQ) have team
Why Square And Cathie Wood's Ark See Bitcoin Environmental Concerns As Unfounded
看
715
回复
评论
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
加载更多
热议股票
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3572676784796175","uuid":"3572676784796175","gmtCreate":1609592177929,"gmtModify":1618390487456,"name":"Buffet97","pinyin":"buffet97","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":37,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.06","exceedPercentage":"60.74%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":633238074,"gmtCreate":1644104801236,"gmtModify":1644104801364,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I c","listText":"I c","text":"I c","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/633238074","repostId":"1105297016","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":633231773,"gmtCreate":1644104780418,"gmtModify":1644104780506,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":" Cool","listText":" Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/633231773","repostId":"2208331476","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2208331476","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1643699100,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2208331476?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-02-01 15:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create \"TelevisaUnivision\", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2208331476","media":"PR Newswire","summary":"Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers ever","content":"<div>\n<p>Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers every day across TV, digital, and audioLargest Spanish-language content library in the world, with 300,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create \"TelevisaUnivision\", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUnivision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create \"TelevisaUnivision\", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-01 15:05 GMT+8 <a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html><strong>PR Newswire</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers every day across TV, digital, and audioLargest Spanish-language content library in the world, with 300,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TV":"墨西哥电视"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2208331476","content_text":"Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers every day across TV, digital, and audioLargest Spanish-language content library in the world, with 300,000 hours of content, is combined with extensive portfolio of IP and sports rights, and constantly refreshed by prolific Spanish-language content engineTelevisaUnivision to launch the premier streaming service for the Spanish speaking audiences in 2022, with free and premium tiers, and large offering of original Spanish-language entertainment, sports and newsSignificant strategic ownership, including Softbank, Google and Grupo Televisa, is uniquely positioned to help drive the strategic objectives of TelevisaUnivisionNEW YORK and MEXICO CITY, Feb. 1, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (\"Televisa\"; NYSE:TV; BMV:TLEVISA CPO) and Univision Holdings II, Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Univision Communications Inc., \"Univision\") today announced the completion of the transaction between Televisa's media content and production assets and Univision. The new company, which is named TelevisaUnivision, Inc. (the \"Company\" or \"TelevisaUnivision\"), creates the world's leading Spanish-language media and content company. TelevisaUnivision will produce and deliver premium content for its own platforms and for others, while also providing innovative solutions for advertisers and distributors globally.\"The close of our transaction marks a historic moment for our company and our industry,\" said TelevisaUnivision CEO Wade Davis. \"We are combining two iconic and market-leading companies that have a rich, shared history and an incredible portfolio of assets. This combination will create a business without comparison in the global media landscape. Over the past year both companies have transformed themselves, reaching levels of financial performance and audience resonance that has not been seen for years. The power and momentum of the transformed core business is truly unique and will be a springboard for the upcoming launch of the preeminent Spanish-language streaming service. The new trajectory of our company is supported by our new ownership group, which is well positioned to amplify the efforts of one of the best leadership teams in the world.\" \"The combination of content assets from Televisa and Univision, the two leading media companies from the two largest Spanish-speaking markets in the world, has created a company with tremendous potential,\" said Alfonso de Angoitia, Executive Chairman of the TelevisaUnivision Board of Directors. \"With our attractive financial profile and history of innovation, TelevisaUnivision is ready to revolutionize the industry by delivering the most comprehensive Spanish-language content offering to audiences around the world.\"The transaction brings together the most compelling content and intellectual property with the most comprehensive media platforms in the two largest Spanish speaking markets in the world. Televisa's four broadcast channels, 27 pay-TV channels, Videocine movie studio, Blim TV subscription video-on-demand service, and the Televisa trademark, will be combined with Univision's assets in the U.S., which include the Univision and UniMás broadcast networks, nine Spanish-language cable networks, 59 television stations and 57 radio stations in major U.S. Hispanic markets, and the PrendeTV AVOD platform.Together, TelevisaUnivision owns the largest library of Spanish-language content and intellectual property in the world, and the most prolific long-form Spanish-language content engine in the industry. As a result of the combination, TelevisaUnivision reaches over 60% of the respective TV audiences in both the U.S. and Mexico. Across television, digital, streaming, and audio, the Company reaches over 100 million Spanish speakers every day, holding leading positions in both markets.Integration and Position as One CompanySince announcing the transaction on April 13, 2021, Univision and Televisa have each transformed their core businesses in anticipation of the integration and are delivering the highest levels of financial and audience growth either company has experienced in years. The long-standing partnership between the two businesses has allowed for improved content and business coordination that will accelerate the integration. These efforts uniquely position TelevisaUnivision to begin executing immediately on a combined strategy and capture the tremendous opportunity presented by the global Spanish-speaking population of nearly 600 million, which represents an aggregate GDP of approximately $7 trillion.The companies have strategically assembled a senior management team of world-class leaders for the global operation, combining great professionals from Televisa and Univision, as well as bringing in top talent from leading media and technology companies.In addition, the TelevisaUnivision transformation also included the development of a massive pipeline of original content for the upcoming global streaming launch, investing in new advertising products in both markets, revamping the programming strategy and executing new distribution partnerships, as well as launching the PrendeTV AVOD service in the U.S., which has served as a powerful pilot for the upcoming streaming launch.As a result of these strategic efforts, both companies have experienced above market advertising revenue growth. Univision's advertising revenue through the first nine months of 2021 increased by 32.6%, returning significantly beyond 2019 levels, while Televisa's advertising revenue for the same period increased by 24% year-over-year.Univision's portfolio of television networks, consisting of Univision, UniMás, Galavision and TUDN, delivered 62% of the primetime viewing on Spanish-language television in the U.S. among adults 18-49, up from 58% compared to 2020, and marked the highest audience share since 2014. Meanwhile, Televisa's content performance and audience delivery in Mexico was equally as impressive. The top 20 programs on broadcast television in Mexico were produced and transmitted by Televisa. Televisa's top three programs during 2021 had audiences between 63% and 73% higher than the top-rated program of its closest competitor. Throughout the week, Televisa's audiences were 91% higher than those of the second largest broadcaster, while audiences at its flagship network, Las Estrellas, were 154% higher than those of its closest competitor. Televisa transmitted eight out of the 10 soccer matches with the highest audiences in Mexico during 2021.Industry-Leading Innovation and ImpactTelevisaUnivision remains on track to launch its previously announced unified global streaming service in 2022, which will include both a free and a premium subscription tier. The service will have the largest offering of original Spanish-language content in the U.S. and Latin America, including dramas, comedies, docuseries, game shows, reality shows, variety programs, movies, musical and cultural events, children's and educational programs, sports and special events, as well as trusted news programming.By tapping into Televisa's vast content vault, along with the new Spanish-language originals in development and a wide range of collaborations with some of the most notable established and up-and-coming creators today, this offering will be the world's first large-scale streaming service specifically developed for the Spanish-speaking audience.Creative partnerships with Eugenio Derbez, Selena Gomez, Maria Dueñas, Mario Vargas Llosa and Santiago Limón were among the first announced and will fuel what will be a truly compelling and first-of-its-kind offering.LeadershipWade Davis will lead TelevisaUnivision as CEO. Alfonso de Angoitia will serve as Executive Chairman of the TelevisaUnivision Board and Marcelo Claure will become Vice Chairman of the Board.The TelevisaUnivision Board will also be comprised of Emilio Azcárraga, Bernardo Gómez, Michel Combes, Gisel Ruiz, Oscar Muñoz, Maria Cristina \"MC\" Gonzalez Noguera, Eric Zinterhofer and Jeff Sine. In addition, Televisa retains the right to appoint two additional directors.Content production and operations in Mexico will be led by Bernardo Gómez and Alfonso de Angoitia, Co-Chief Executive Officers of TelevisaUnivision Mexico, who also remain co-Chief Executive Officers of Grupo Televisa. Grupo Televisa's news operations in Mexico will become part of a new, independent company dedicated to producing news for TelevisaUnivision's networks in Mexico, and will be led by Emilio Azcárraga, Executive Chairman of the Grupo Televisa Board of Directors.The Company's new investors include SoftBank Latin America Fund, Google and The Raine Group.AdvisorsFor Univision: Guggenheim Securities and J.P. Morgan acted as financial advisors; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP and Sidley Austin LLP served as legal counsel; and Covington & Burling LLP served as regulatory counsel.For Televisa: Allen & Company acted as financial advisor; Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, and Mijares, Angoitia, Cortés y Fuentes, S.C. served as legal counsel; and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP served as regulatory counsel. LionTree Advisors LLC rendered a fairness opinion to the Board of Directors of Televisa.Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP served as legal counsel to the SoftBank Latin America Fund.Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP served as legal counsel to The Raine Group.About TelevisaUnivisionAs the leading Spanish-language media and content company in the world, TelevisaUnivision features the largest library of owned content and industry-leading production capabilities that power its streaming, digital and linear television offerings, as well as its radio platforms. The Company's media portfolio includes the top-rated broadcast networks Univision and UniMás in the U.S. and Las Estrellas and Canal 5 in Mexico. TelevisaUnivision is home to 36 Spanish-language cable networks, including Galavisión and TUDN, the No. 1 Spanish-language sports network in the U.S. and Mexico. With the most compelling portfolio of Spanish-language sports rights in the world, TelevisaUnivision has solidified its position as the Home of Soccer. TelevisaUnivision also owns and manages 59 television stations across the U.S. and four broadcast channels in Mexico affiliated with 222 television stations, Videocine studio, and Uforia, the Home of Latin Music, which encompasses 57 owned or operated U.S. radio stations, a live event series and a robust digital audio footprint. TelevisaUnivision is home to premium streaming services PrendeTV and Blim TV, which altogether host over 40,000 hours of high-quality, original Spanish-language programming from distinguished producers and top talent. The Company's prominent digital assets include Univision.com, Univision NOW, and several top-rated digital apps. For more information, visit televisaunivision.com.About TelevisaTelevisa is a major telecommunications corporation which owns and operates one of the most significant cable companies as well as a leading direct-to-home satellite pay television system in Mexico. Televisa's cable business offers integrated services, including video, high-speed data and voice to residential and commercial customers as well as managed services to domestic and international carriers. Televisa owns a majority interest in Sky, a leading direct-to-home satellite pay television system and broadband provider in Mexico, operating also in the Dominican Republic and Central America. Televisa holds a number of concessions by the Mexican government that authorizes it to broadcast programming over television stations for the signals of Univision Holdings II, Inc. (\"Univision\"), and Televisa's cable and DTH systems. In addition, Televisa is the largest shareholder of TelevisaUnivision, the controlling company of Univision Communications Inc., a leading media company producing, creating, and distributing Spanish-speaking content through several broadcast channels in Mexico, the US and over 70 countries through television networks, cable operators and over-the-top or \"OTT\" services. Televisa also has interests in magazine publishing and distribution, professional sports and live entertainment, and gaming.Forward Looking StatementsThis press release contains forward-looking statements based on the current expectations of the Company and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. Words such as \"believe\", \"anticipate\", \"plan\", \"expect\", \"intend\", \"seek\", \"potential\", \"target\", \"estimate\", \"project\", \"predict\", \"forecast\", \"guideline\", \"may\", \"should\", \"could\", \"will\" and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying these statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Also, these forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this press release. We undertake no obligation to modify or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date that the forward-looking statement was made. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include: risks and uncertainties related to, and disruptions to the Company's business and operations caused by, the business combination of Televisa and Univision and the combination of the companies' content businesses, and impacts of any changes in strategies following the consummation of such business combination; our ability to successfully launch our streaming service; risks and uncertainties as to the evolving and uncertain nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Company, the media industry, and the economy in general, including interference with, or increased cost of, the Company's or its partners' production and programming, changes in advertising revenue, suspension of sporting and other live events, disruptions to the Company's operations and the Company's response to the COVID-19 virus related to facilities closings and increases in expenses relating to precautionary measures at the Company's facilities to protect the health and well-being of its employees due to COVID-19; economic and political developments and conditions; uncertainty in global financial markets; changes in inflation rates; changes in interest rates; the impact of existing laws and regulations, changes thereto or the imposition of new laws and regulations affecting our businesses, activities and investments; changes in customer demand; and effects of competition, as well as other factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LBIX":1,"TV":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":633927027,"gmtCreate":1643699454688,"gmtModify":1643699454753,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Insightful","listText":"Insightful","text":"Insightful","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/633927027","repostId":"1138536970","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2273,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":633924471,"gmtCreate":1643699350426,"gmtModify":1643699350491,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/633924471","repostId":"2208331476","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2208331476","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1643699100,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2208331476?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-02-01 15:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create \"TelevisaUnivision\", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2208331476","media":"PR Newswire","summary":"Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers ever","content":"<div>\n<p>Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers every day across TV, digital, and audioLargest Spanish-language content library in the world, with 300,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Univision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create \"TelevisaUnivision\", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUnivision and Televisa Complete Transaction to Create \"TelevisaUnivision\", the World's Leading Spanish-Language Media and Content Company\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-01 15:05 GMT+8 <a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html><strong>PR Newswire</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers every day across TV, digital, and audioLargest Spanish-language content library in the world, with 300,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TV":"墨西哥电视"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/univision-televisa-complete-transaction-create-054900088.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2208331476","content_text":"Brings together market leadership across U.S. and Mexico, reaching 100 million Spanish speakers every day across TV, digital, and audioLargest Spanish-language content library in the world, with 300,000 hours of content, is combined with extensive portfolio of IP and sports rights, and constantly refreshed by prolific Spanish-language content engineTelevisaUnivision to launch the premier streaming service for the Spanish speaking audiences in 2022, with free and premium tiers, and large offering of original Spanish-language entertainment, sports and newsSignificant strategic ownership, including Softbank, Google and Grupo Televisa, is uniquely positioned to help drive the strategic objectives of TelevisaUnivisionNEW YORK and MEXICO CITY, Feb. 1, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (\"Televisa\"; NYSE:TV; BMV:TLEVISA CPO) and Univision Holdings II, Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Univision Communications Inc., \"Univision\") today announced the completion of the transaction between Televisa's media content and production assets and Univision. The new company, which is named TelevisaUnivision, Inc. (the \"Company\" or \"TelevisaUnivision\"), creates the world's leading Spanish-language media and content company. TelevisaUnivision will produce and deliver premium content for its own platforms and for others, while also providing innovative solutions for advertisers and distributors globally.\"The close of our transaction marks a historic moment for our company and our industry,\" said TelevisaUnivision CEO Wade Davis. \"We are combining two iconic and market-leading companies that have a rich, shared history and an incredible portfolio of assets. This combination will create a business without comparison in the global media landscape. Over the past year both companies have transformed themselves, reaching levels of financial performance and audience resonance that has not been seen for years. The power and momentum of the transformed core business is truly unique and will be a springboard for the upcoming launch of the preeminent Spanish-language streaming service. The new trajectory of our company is supported by our new ownership group, which is well positioned to amplify the efforts of one of the best leadership teams in the world.\" \"The combination of content assets from Televisa and Univision, the two leading media companies from the two largest Spanish-speaking markets in the world, has created a company with tremendous potential,\" said Alfonso de Angoitia, Executive Chairman of the TelevisaUnivision Board of Directors. \"With our attractive financial profile and history of innovation, TelevisaUnivision is ready to revolutionize the industry by delivering the most comprehensive Spanish-language content offering to audiences around the world.\"The transaction brings together the most compelling content and intellectual property with the most comprehensive media platforms in the two largest Spanish speaking markets in the world. Televisa's four broadcast channels, 27 pay-TV channels, Videocine movie studio, Blim TV subscription video-on-demand service, and the Televisa trademark, will be combined with Univision's assets in the U.S., which include the Univision and UniMás broadcast networks, nine Spanish-language cable networks, 59 television stations and 57 radio stations in major U.S. Hispanic markets, and the PrendeTV AVOD platform.Together, TelevisaUnivision owns the largest library of Spanish-language content and intellectual property in the world, and the most prolific long-form Spanish-language content engine in the industry. As a result of the combination, TelevisaUnivision reaches over 60% of the respective TV audiences in both the U.S. and Mexico. Across television, digital, streaming, and audio, the Company reaches over 100 million Spanish speakers every day, holding leading positions in both markets.Integration and Position as One CompanySince announcing the transaction on April 13, 2021, Univision and Televisa have each transformed their core businesses in anticipation of the integration and are delivering the highest levels of financial and audience growth either company has experienced in years. The long-standing partnership between the two businesses has allowed for improved content and business coordination that will accelerate the integration. These efforts uniquely position TelevisaUnivision to begin executing immediately on a combined strategy and capture the tremendous opportunity presented by the global Spanish-speaking population of nearly 600 million, which represents an aggregate GDP of approximately $7 trillion.The companies have strategically assembled a senior management team of world-class leaders for the global operation, combining great professionals from Televisa and Univision, as well as bringing in top talent from leading media and technology companies.In addition, the TelevisaUnivision transformation also included the development of a massive pipeline of original content for the upcoming global streaming launch, investing in new advertising products in both markets, revamping the programming strategy and executing new distribution partnerships, as well as launching the PrendeTV AVOD service in the U.S., which has served as a powerful pilot for the upcoming streaming launch.As a result of these strategic efforts, both companies have experienced above market advertising revenue growth. Univision's advertising revenue through the first nine months of 2021 increased by 32.6%, returning significantly beyond 2019 levels, while Televisa's advertising revenue for the same period increased by 24% year-over-year.Univision's portfolio of television networks, consisting of Univision, UniMás, Galavision and TUDN, delivered 62% of the primetime viewing on Spanish-language television in the U.S. among adults 18-49, up from 58% compared to 2020, and marked the highest audience share since 2014. Meanwhile, Televisa's content performance and audience delivery in Mexico was equally as impressive. The top 20 programs on broadcast television in Mexico were produced and transmitted by Televisa. Televisa's top three programs during 2021 had audiences between 63% and 73% higher than the top-rated program of its closest competitor. Throughout the week, Televisa's audiences were 91% higher than those of the second largest broadcaster, while audiences at its flagship network, Las Estrellas, were 154% higher than those of its closest competitor. Televisa transmitted eight out of the 10 soccer matches with the highest audiences in Mexico during 2021.Industry-Leading Innovation and ImpactTelevisaUnivision remains on track to launch its previously announced unified global streaming service in 2022, which will include both a free and a premium subscription tier. The service will have the largest offering of original Spanish-language content in the U.S. and Latin America, including dramas, comedies, docuseries, game shows, reality shows, variety programs, movies, musical and cultural events, children's and educational programs, sports and special events, as well as trusted news programming.By tapping into Televisa's vast content vault, along with the new Spanish-language originals in development and a wide range of collaborations with some of the most notable established and up-and-coming creators today, this offering will be the world's first large-scale streaming service specifically developed for the Spanish-speaking audience.Creative partnerships with Eugenio Derbez, Selena Gomez, Maria Dueñas, Mario Vargas Llosa and Santiago Limón were among the first announced and will fuel what will be a truly compelling and first-of-its-kind offering.LeadershipWade Davis will lead TelevisaUnivision as CEO. Alfonso de Angoitia will serve as Executive Chairman of the TelevisaUnivision Board and Marcelo Claure will become Vice Chairman of the Board.The TelevisaUnivision Board will also be comprised of Emilio Azcárraga, Bernardo Gómez, Michel Combes, Gisel Ruiz, Oscar Muñoz, Maria Cristina \"MC\" Gonzalez Noguera, Eric Zinterhofer and Jeff Sine. In addition, Televisa retains the right to appoint two additional directors.Content production and operations in Mexico will be led by Bernardo Gómez and Alfonso de Angoitia, Co-Chief Executive Officers of TelevisaUnivision Mexico, who also remain co-Chief Executive Officers of Grupo Televisa. Grupo Televisa's news operations in Mexico will become part of a new, independent company dedicated to producing news for TelevisaUnivision's networks in Mexico, and will be led by Emilio Azcárraga, Executive Chairman of the Grupo Televisa Board of Directors.The Company's new investors include SoftBank Latin America Fund, Google and The Raine Group.AdvisorsFor Univision: Guggenheim Securities and J.P. Morgan acted as financial advisors; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP and Sidley Austin LLP served as legal counsel; and Covington & Burling LLP served as regulatory counsel.For Televisa: Allen & Company acted as financial advisor; Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, and Mijares, Angoitia, Cortés y Fuentes, S.C. served as legal counsel; and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP served as regulatory counsel. LionTree Advisors LLC rendered a fairness opinion to the Board of Directors of Televisa.Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP served as legal counsel to the SoftBank Latin America Fund.Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP served as legal counsel to The Raine Group.About TelevisaUnivisionAs the leading Spanish-language media and content company in the world, TelevisaUnivision features the largest library of owned content and industry-leading production capabilities that power its streaming, digital and linear television offerings, as well as its radio platforms. The Company's media portfolio includes the top-rated broadcast networks Univision and UniMás in the U.S. and Las Estrellas and Canal 5 in Mexico. TelevisaUnivision is home to 36 Spanish-language cable networks, including Galavisión and TUDN, the No. 1 Spanish-language sports network in the U.S. and Mexico. With the most compelling portfolio of Spanish-language sports rights in the world, TelevisaUnivision has solidified its position as the Home of Soccer. TelevisaUnivision also owns and manages 59 television stations across the U.S. and four broadcast channels in Mexico affiliated with 222 television stations, Videocine studio, and Uforia, the Home of Latin Music, which encompasses 57 owned or operated U.S. radio stations, a live event series and a robust digital audio footprint. TelevisaUnivision is home to premium streaming services PrendeTV and Blim TV, which altogether host over 40,000 hours of high-quality, original Spanish-language programming from distinguished producers and top talent. The Company's prominent digital assets include Univision.com, Univision NOW, and several top-rated digital apps. For more information, visit televisaunivision.com.About TelevisaTelevisa is a major telecommunications corporation which owns and operates one of the most significant cable companies as well as a leading direct-to-home satellite pay television system in Mexico. Televisa's cable business offers integrated services, including video, high-speed data and voice to residential and commercial customers as well as managed services to domestic and international carriers. Televisa owns a majority interest in Sky, a leading direct-to-home satellite pay television system and broadband provider in Mexico, operating also in the Dominican Republic and Central America. Televisa holds a number of concessions by the Mexican government that authorizes it to broadcast programming over television stations for the signals of Univision Holdings II, Inc. (\"Univision\"), and Televisa's cable and DTH systems. In addition, Televisa is the largest shareholder of TelevisaUnivision, the controlling company of Univision Communications Inc., a leading media company producing, creating, and distributing Spanish-speaking content through several broadcast channels in Mexico, the US and over 70 countries through television networks, cable operators and over-the-top or \"OTT\" services. Televisa also has interests in magazine publishing and distribution, professional sports and live entertainment, and gaming.Forward Looking StatementsThis press release contains forward-looking statements based on the current expectations of the Company and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. Words such as \"believe\", \"anticipate\", \"plan\", \"expect\", \"intend\", \"seek\", \"potential\", \"target\", \"estimate\", \"project\", \"predict\", \"forecast\", \"guideline\", \"may\", \"should\", \"could\", \"will\" and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying these statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Also, these forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this press release. We undertake no obligation to modify or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date that the forward-looking statement was made. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include: risks and uncertainties related to, and disruptions to the Company's business and operations caused by, the business combination of Televisa and Univision and the combination of the companies' content businesses, and impacts of any changes in strategies following the consummation of such business combination; our ability to successfully launch our streaming service; risks and uncertainties as to the evolving and uncertain nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Company, the media industry, and the economy in general, including interference with, or increased cost of, the Company's or its partners' production and programming, changes in advertising revenue, suspension of sporting and other live events, disruptions to the Company's operations and the Company's response to the COVID-19 virus related to facilities closings and increases in expenses relating to precautionary measures at the Company's facilities to protect the health and well-being of its employees due to COVID-19; economic and political developments and conditions; uncertainty in global financial markets; changes in inflation rates; changes in interest rates; the impact of existing laws and regulations, changes thereto or the imposition of new laws and regulations affecting our businesses, activities and investments; changes in customer demand; and effects of competition, as well as other factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LBIX":1,"TV":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1657,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":803459782,"gmtCreate":1627459401746,"gmtModify":1633764801485,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3572676784796175\">@Buffet97</a>:I see","listText":"//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3572676784796175\">@Buffet97</a>:I see","text":"//@Buffet97:I see","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/803459782","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1001,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170167209,"gmtCreate":1626413713401,"gmtModify":1633926953470,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I see","listText":"I see","text":"I see","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170167209","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1435,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":163396477,"gmtCreate":1623859410299,"gmtModify":1634026909137,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/163396477","repostId":"2143926717","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143926717","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1623854867,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143926717?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-16 22:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"At Home Group accepts Hellman & Friedman's raised offer","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143926717","media":"Reuters","summary":"June 16 (Reuters) - At Home Group Inc accepted a raised cash offer of $37 per share from private-equ","content":"<p>June 16 (Reuters) - At Home Group Inc accepted a raised cash offer of $37 per share from private-equity firm Hellman & Friedman for the home decor chain, months after an earlier bid from the private-equity firm faced opposition from hedge fund Honest Capital.</p>\n<p>Plano, Texas-based At Home Group said the new offer represented a premium of about 21% to the closing stock price on May 4, a day before reports of a potential deal surfaced. The initial offer of $36 per share represented a premium of about 17%.</p>\n<p>Honest Capital said in May, in a letter to At Home, the initial offer from Hellman & Friedman was too low a valuation, given the company's plans to more than double the number of its stores to 600.</p>\n<p>At Home's largest shareholder CAS Investment Partners had also said, according to a letter obtained by Reuters, it would vote against the deal, saying the first offer grossly undervalued the home decor chain.</p>\n<p>\"This price increase represents our best and final offer,\" Hellman & Friedman Partner Erik Ragatz said in a statement on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>H&F will commence a tender offer around June 23 to acquire all outstanding shares of At Home's common stock, At Home Group said.</p>\n<p>Honest Capital could not be immediately reached for a comment, and CAS did not immediately respond.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>At Home Group accepts Hellman & Friedman's raised offer</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAt Home Group accepts Hellman & Friedman's raised offer\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-16 22:47</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>June 16 (Reuters) - At Home Group Inc accepted a raised cash offer of $37 per share from private-equity firm Hellman & Friedman for the home decor chain, months after an earlier bid from the private-equity firm faced opposition from hedge fund Honest Capital.</p>\n<p>Plano, Texas-based At Home Group said the new offer represented a premium of about 21% to the closing stock price on May 4, a day before reports of a potential deal surfaced. The initial offer of $36 per share represented a premium of about 17%.</p>\n<p>Honest Capital said in May, in a letter to At Home, the initial offer from Hellman & Friedman was too low a valuation, given the company's plans to more than double the number of its stores to 600.</p>\n<p>At Home's largest shareholder CAS Investment Partners had also said, according to a letter obtained by Reuters, it would vote against the deal, saying the first offer grossly undervalued the home decor chain.</p>\n<p>\"This price increase represents our best and final offer,\" Hellman & Friedman Partner Erik Ragatz said in a statement on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>H&F will commence a tender offer around June 23 to acquire all outstanding shares of At Home's common stock, At Home Group said.</p>\n<p>Honest Capital could not be immediately reached for a comment, and CAS did not immediately respond.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HOME":"At Home Group Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143926717","content_text":"June 16 (Reuters) - At Home Group Inc accepted a raised cash offer of $37 per share from private-equity firm Hellman & Friedman for the home decor chain, months after an earlier bid from the private-equity firm faced opposition from hedge fund Honest Capital.\nPlano, Texas-based At Home Group said the new offer represented a premium of about 21% to the closing stock price on May 4, a day before reports of a potential deal surfaced. The initial offer of $36 per share represented a premium of about 17%.\nHonest Capital said in May, in a letter to At Home, the initial offer from Hellman & Friedman was too low a valuation, given the company's plans to more than double the number of its stores to 600.\nAt Home's largest shareholder CAS Investment Partners had also said, according to a letter obtained by Reuters, it would vote against the deal, saying the first offer grossly undervalued the home decor chain.\n\"This price increase represents our best and final offer,\" Hellman & Friedman Partner Erik Ragatz said in a statement on Wednesday.\nH&F will commence a tender offer around June 23 to acquire all outstanding shares of At Home's common stock, At Home Group said.\nHonest Capital could not be immediately reached for a comment, and CAS did not immediately respond.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HOME":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":841,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":199504263,"gmtCreate":1620714537352,"gmtModify":1634196887030,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh","listText":"Oh","text":"Oh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/199504263","repostId":"2134650784","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2134650784","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1620713138,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2134650784?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-11 14:05","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"London copper rises as traders bet on bullish demand outlook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2134650784","media":"Reuters","summary":"HANOI, May 11 (Reuters) - London copper prices climbed on Tuesday, as traders bet on demand prospect","content":"<p>HANOI, May 11 (Reuters) - London copper prices climbed on Tuesday, as traders bet on demand prospects from metal-reliant renewable energy and electric vehicles <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EV\">$(EV)$</a> sectors and as the global economy steadily recovers from the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Three-month copper on the London Metal Exchange was up 1% at $10,490 a tonne, as of 0538 GMT, inching closer to a record peak of $10,747.50 notched in the previous session.</p>\n<p>The most-traded June copper contract on the Shanghai Futures Exchange dipped 0.5% to 76,380 yuan ($11,887.94) a tonne, clawing back from early losses of 2.5%.</p>\n<p>\"The continued strengthening of the global economy, at the same time as governments are intent on increasing stimulus measures is driving sentiment higher,\" said ANZ analysts in a report.</p>\n<p>\"Copper is also attracting interest from investors looking to benefit from the new energy sector, with demand from the renewable energy and EV sector expected to boost demand,\" they added.</p>\n<p>FUNDAMENTALS</p>\n<p>* A union representing workers at BHP Group's Escondida and Spence copper mines in Chile has called for a strike vote among its members after contract negotiations stalled.</p>\n<p>* A shortage of copper and dwindling inventories in the long-term are likely to propel prices of the industrial metal to levels beyond current record highs, unless scrap supplies rise significantly, analysts said.</p>\n<p>* ShFE copper speculative net long rose to 52.8% of open interest on Monday, the highest since the position rose to an 18-year high of 57.9% in February, from Friday's 47.4%, Marex Analytics data showed.</p>\n<p>* About 50-80% of LME copper warrants are currently held by <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> party.</p>\n<p>* More than 90% of LME tin inventories and short-term futures are currently held by a party.</p>\n<p>* LME aluminium rose 1.8% to $2,577 a tonne, LME aluminium climbed 1.9% to $2,579.50 a tonne, while ShFE nickel dropped 1.2% to 131,960 yuan a tonne.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>London copper rises as traders bet on bullish demand outlook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLondon copper rises as traders bet on bullish demand outlook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-11 14:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>HANOI, May 11 (Reuters) - London copper prices climbed on Tuesday, as traders bet on demand prospects from metal-reliant renewable energy and electric vehicles <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EV\">$(EV)$</a> sectors and as the global economy steadily recovers from the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Three-month copper on the London Metal Exchange was up 1% at $10,490 a tonne, as of 0538 GMT, inching closer to a record peak of $10,747.50 notched in the previous session.</p>\n<p>The most-traded June copper contract on the Shanghai Futures Exchange dipped 0.5% to 76,380 yuan ($11,887.94) a tonne, clawing back from early losses of 2.5%.</p>\n<p>\"The continued strengthening of the global economy, at the same time as governments are intent on increasing stimulus measures is driving sentiment higher,\" said ANZ analysts in a report.</p>\n<p>\"Copper is also attracting interest from investors looking to benefit from the new energy sector, with demand from the renewable energy and EV sector expected to boost demand,\" they added.</p>\n<p>FUNDAMENTALS</p>\n<p>* A union representing workers at BHP Group's Escondida and Spence copper mines in Chile has called for a strike vote among its members after contract negotiations stalled.</p>\n<p>* A shortage of copper and dwindling inventories in the long-term are likely to propel prices of the industrial metal to levels beyond current record highs, unless scrap supplies rise significantly, analysts said.</p>\n<p>* ShFE copper speculative net long rose to 52.8% of open interest on Monday, the highest since the position rose to an 18-year high of 57.9% in February, from Friday's 47.4%, Marex Analytics data showed.</p>\n<p>* About 50-80% of LME copper warrants are currently held by <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> party.</p>\n<p>* More than 90% of LME tin inventories and short-term futures are currently held by a party.</p>\n<p>* LME aluminium rose 1.8% to $2,577 a tonne, LME aluminium climbed 1.9% to $2,579.50 a tonne, while ShFE nickel dropped 1.2% to 131,960 yuan a tonne.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2134650784","content_text":"HANOI, May 11 (Reuters) - London copper prices climbed on Tuesday, as traders bet on demand prospects from metal-reliant renewable energy and electric vehicles $(EV)$ sectors and as the global economy steadily recovers from the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.\nThree-month copper on the London Metal Exchange was up 1% at $10,490 a tonne, as of 0538 GMT, inching closer to a record peak of $10,747.50 notched in the previous session.\nThe most-traded June copper contract on the Shanghai Futures Exchange dipped 0.5% to 76,380 yuan ($11,887.94) a tonne, clawing back from early losses of 2.5%.\n\"The continued strengthening of the global economy, at the same time as governments are intent on increasing stimulus measures is driving sentiment higher,\" said ANZ analysts in a report.\n\"Copper is also attracting interest from investors looking to benefit from the new energy sector, with demand from the renewable energy and EV sector expected to boost demand,\" they added.\nFUNDAMENTALS\n* A union representing workers at BHP Group's Escondida and Spence copper mines in Chile has called for a strike vote among its members after contract negotiations stalled.\n* A shortage of copper and dwindling inventories in the long-term are likely to propel prices of the industrial metal to levels beyond current record highs, unless scrap supplies rise significantly, analysts said.\n* ShFE copper speculative net long rose to 52.8% of open interest on Monday, the highest since the position rose to an 18-year high of 57.9% in February, from Friday's 47.4%, Marex Analytics data showed.\n* About 50-80% of LME copper warrants are currently held by one party.\n* More than 90% of LME tin inventories and short-term futures are currently held by a party.\n* LME aluminium rose 1.8% to $2,577 a tonne, LME aluminium climbed 1.9% to $2,579.50 a tonne, while ShFE nickel dropped 1.2% to 131,960 yuan a tonne.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HGmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":774,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":199016145,"gmtCreate":1620656434787,"gmtModify":1634197354518,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/199016145","repostId":"1116731360","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":972,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376952970,"gmtCreate":1619083008990,"gmtModify":1634288694964,"author":{"id":"3572676784796175","authorId":"3572676784796175","name":"Buffet97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bf8ad93a7362a593fae5bc069705f2f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572676784796175","authorIdStr":"3572676784796175"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/376952970","repostId":"1134663439","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134663439","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619082614,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1134663439?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-22 17:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Square And Cathie Wood's Ark See Bitcoin Environmental Concerns As Unfounded","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134663439","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Cathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management and digital payment company Square Inc.(NYSE:SQ) have team","content":"<p>Cathie Wood-led <b>Ark Investment Management</b> and digital payment company <b>Square Inc.</b>(NYSE:SQ) have teamed up to dispel the notion thatBitcoin(BTC) mining is damaging the environment.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b> Ark Investment and Jack Dorsey-led Squarereleaseda whitepaper arguing that Bitcoin mining provides an opportunity to spur the global energy transition to renewables by serving as a complementary technology for clean energy production and storage.</p><p>“Combining generation with both storage and miners presents a better overall value proposition than building generation and storage alone,” the companies noted.</p><p>The companies believe that Bitcoin miners as a flexible and easily interruptible load option could likely solve the intermittency and grid congestion problems hampering the deployment of solar and wind energy, which are now the cheapest energy sources in the world.</p><p>The combination of miners with renewable and storage projects could improve the returns for project investors, allow for the construction of solar and wind projects even before the completion of lengthy grid interconnection studies, and provide the grid with readily available “excess” energy, according to the paper.</p><p>“The bitcoin and energy markets are converging and we believe the energy asset owners of today will likely become the miners of tomorrow,” the companies concluded.</p><p>Square is heavily invested in Bitcoin. Cathie Wood is also bullish on cryptocurrencies and hasacquired sharesin cryptocurrency exchange<b>Coinbase Global Inc.</b>(NASDAQ:COIN), which recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange.</p><p><b>Why It Matters:</b> The release of the research paper comes amid arguments that Bitcoin causes tons of carbon emissions and environmental degradation<b>.</b></p><p>Bank of America analyst Francisco Blanchcriticized Bitcoin in March, noting that the Bitcoin network emits about 60 million tons of CO2 annually, roughly the same carbon footprint as the nation of Greece.</p><p>For every $1 billion of fresh inflow into bitcoin, Blanch estimates the cryptocurrency will generate additional CO2 levels equivalent to about 1.2 million cars with internal combustion engines.</p><p><b>Microsoft Corporation</b> (NASDAQ:MSFT) founder Bill Gates has also expressed concerns about Bitcoin’s impact on climate change,notingin February that the cryptocurrency “uses more electricity per transaction than any other method known to mankind.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Square And Cathie Wood's Ark See Bitcoin Environmental Concerns As Unfounded</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Square And Cathie Wood's Ark See Bitcoin Environmental Concerns As Unfounded\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-22 17:10</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Cathie Wood-led <b>Ark Investment Management</b> and digital payment company <b>Square Inc.</b>(NYSE:SQ) have teamed up to dispel the notion thatBitcoin(BTC) mining is damaging the environment.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b> Ark Investment and Jack Dorsey-led Squarereleaseda whitepaper arguing that Bitcoin mining provides an opportunity to spur the global energy transition to renewables by serving as a complementary technology for clean energy production and storage.</p><p>“Combining generation with both storage and miners presents a better overall value proposition than building generation and storage alone,” the companies noted.</p><p>The companies believe that Bitcoin miners as a flexible and easily interruptible load option could likely solve the intermittency and grid congestion problems hampering the deployment of solar and wind energy, which are now the cheapest energy sources in the world.</p><p>The combination of miners with renewable and storage projects could improve the returns for project investors, allow for the construction of solar and wind projects even before the completion of lengthy grid interconnection studies, and provide the grid with readily available “excess” energy, according to the paper.</p><p>“The bitcoin and energy markets are converging and we believe the energy asset owners of today will likely become the miners of tomorrow,” the companies concluded.</p><p>Square is heavily invested in Bitcoin. Cathie Wood is also bullish on cryptocurrencies and hasacquired sharesin cryptocurrency exchange<b>Coinbase Global Inc.</b>(NASDAQ:COIN), which recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange.</p><p><b>Why It Matters:</b> The release of the research paper comes amid arguments that Bitcoin causes tons of carbon emissions and environmental degradation<b>.</b></p><p>Bank of America analyst Francisco Blanchcriticized Bitcoin in March, noting that the Bitcoin network emits about 60 million tons of CO2 annually, roughly the same carbon footprint as the nation of Greece.</p><p>For every $1 billion of fresh inflow into bitcoin, Blanch estimates the cryptocurrency will generate additional CO2 levels equivalent to about 1.2 million cars with internal combustion engines.</p><p><b>Microsoft Corporation</b> (NASDAQ:MSFT) founder Bill Gates has also expressed concerns about Bitcoin’s impact on climate change,notingin February that the cryptocurrency “uses more electricity per transaction than any other method known to mankind.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134663439","content_text":"Cathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management and digital payment company Square Inc.(NYSE:SQ) have teamed up to dispel the notion thatBitcoin(BTC) mining is damaging the environment.What Happened: Ark Investment and Jack Dorsey-led Squarereleaseda whitepaper arguing that Bitcoin mining provides an opportunity to spur the global energy transition to renewables by serving as a complementary technology for clean energy production and storage.“Combining generation with both storage and miners presents a better overall value proposition than building generation and storage alone,” the companies noted.The companies believe that Bitcoin miners as a flexible and easily interruptible load option could likely solve the intermittency and grid congestion problems hampering the deployment of solar and wind energy, which are now the cheapest energy sources in the world.The combination of miners with renewable and storage projects could improve the returns for project investors, allow for the construction of solar and wind projects even before the completion of lengthy grid interconnection studies, and provide the grid with readily available “excess” energy, according to the paper.“The bitcoin and energy markets are converging and we believe the energy asset owners of today will likely become the miners of tomorrow,” the companies concluded.Square is heavily invested in Bitcoin. Cathie Wood is also bullish on cryptocurrencies and hasacquired sharesin cryptocurrency exchangeCoinbase Global Inc.(NASDAQ:COIN), which recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange.Why It Matters: The release of the research paper comes amid arguments that Bitcoin causes tons of carbon emissions and environmental degradation.Bank of America analyst Francisco Blanchcriticized Bitcoin in March, noting that the Bitcoin network emits about 60 million tons of CO2 annually, roughly the same carbon footprint as the nation of Greece.For every $1 billion of fresh inflow into bitcoin, Blanch estimates the cryptocurrency will generate additional CO2 levels equivalent to about 1.2 million cars with internal combustion engines.Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) founder Bill Gates has also expressed concerns about Bitcoin’s impact on climate change,notingin February that the cryptocurrency “uses more electricity per transaction than any other method known to mankind.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SQ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":715,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}