社区
首页
集团介绍
社区
资讯
行情
学堂
TigerAI
登录
注册
kenntan
IP属地：未知
+关注
帖子 · 13
帖子 · 13
关注 · 0
关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0
粉丝 · 0
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-05-08
Like please
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
1,738
回复
评论
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-03-08
[微笑] [开心]
U.S. Stocks open up, as strong jobs report boosts reopening optimism<blockquote>美国股市开盘，强劲的就业报告提振了重新开放的乐观情绪</blockquote>
(March 5) Stocks were set to rebound after a stronger-than-expected jobs report boosted optimism abo
U.S. Stocks open up, as strong jobs report boosts reopening optimism<blockquote>美国股市开盘，强劲的就业报告提振了重新开放的乐观情绪</blockquote>
看
1,847
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-03-08
For the coins. Thanks!
Palantir plunged more than 13%<blockquote>Palantir暴跌超13%</blockquote>
(March 5) Palantir plunged more than 13%.
Palantir plunged more than 13%<blockquote>Palantir暴跌超13%</blockquote>
看
1,310
回复
1
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-03-03
Hi
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
2,694
回复
1
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-02-17
Like and comment. Thanks!
Citibank can't get back $500 million it wired by mistake, judge rules<blockquote>法官裁定花旗银行无法收回误汇的5亿美元</blockquote>
New York (CNN Business) After committing one of the "biggest blunders in banking history," Citibank
Citibank can't get back $500 million it wired by mistake, judge rules<blockquote>法官裁定花旗银行无法收回误汇的5亿美元</blockquote>
看
2,155
回复
1
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-02-17
For the coins!
Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>
Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die. Now Japanese c
Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>
看
1,528
回复
1
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-02-16
For the likes! <3
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
1,630
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-02-04
For the coins [微笑]
Emerging Markets May Already Have Reached Their Peak for 2021, Morgan Stanley Says<blockquote>摩根士丹利表示，新兴市场可能已经在2021年达到顶峰</blockquote>
It’s a little early in the year to be discussing peaks, but the top may have come and gone for a pop
Emerging Markets May Already Have Reached Their Peak for 2021, Morgan Stanley Says<blockquote>摩根士丹利表示，新兴市场可能已经在2021年达到顶峰</blockquote>
看
1,853
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-02-04
For the coins.
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
3,242
回复
1
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
kenntan
kenntan
·
2021-02-03
Ggwp
Short-sellers were pulling back even before Reddit’s GameStop squeeze<blockquote>甚至在Reddit的游戏驿站挤压之前，卖空者就已经撤退了</blockquote>
Short-sellers in GameStopGME,-60.00%and other targeted stocks have been beaten up recently, but shor
Short-sellers were pulling back even before Reddit’s GameStop squeeze<blockquote>甚至在Reddit的游戏驿站挤压之前，卖空者就已经撤退了</blockquote>
看
2,892
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
加载更多
热议股票
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573534203095145","uuid":"3573534203095145","gmtCreate":1610442329706,"gmtModify":1612193654413,"name":"kenntan","pinyin":"kenntan","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":6,"tweetSize":13,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-2","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"资深虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1000天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.10","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":"60.99%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":104486227,"gmtCreate":1620403498969,"gmtModify":1634205460535,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please","listText":"Like please","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/104486227","repostId":"1171540841","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1738,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":320489028,"gmtCreate":1615167810464,"gmtModify":1703485095868,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[微笑] [开心] ","listText":"[微笑] [开心] ","text":"[微笑] [开心]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/320489028","repostId":"1116017255","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116017255","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1614954925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1116017255?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-05 22:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stocks open up, as strong jobs report boosts reopening optimism<blockquote>美国股市开盘，强劲的就业报告提振了重新开放的乐观情绪</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116017255","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"(March 5) Stocks were set to rebound after a stronger-than-expected jobs report boosted optimism abo","content":"<p>(March 5) Stocks were set to rebound after a stronger-than-expected jobs report boosted optimism about a faster economic reopening.</p><p><blockquote>（3月5日）强于预期的就业报告提振了人们对经济更快重新开放的乐观情绪，股市有望反弹。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow up 0.93%, the S&P 500 rose 1.05%, and the Nasdaq Composite jumped 1.13%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数上涨0.93%，标普500上涨1.05%，纳斯达克综合指数上涨1.13%。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5a0f3bfa9164920f4899e3f22741e69\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"572\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 09:30</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>*来源自Tiger Trade，美国东部时间09:30</span></p></blockquote></p><p>The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield popped above 1.6% after the February jobs report. The Labor Department on Fridayreportedthat nonfarm payrolls jumped by 379,000 for the month and the unemployment rate fell to 6.2%. That compared to expectations of 210,000 new jobs and the unemployment rate to hold steady from the 6.3% rate in January, according to Dow Jones.</p><p><blockquote>2月份就业报告公布后，美国10年期国债收益率跃升至1.6%以上。美国劳工部周五报告称，本月非农就业人数增加37.9万人，失业率降至6.2%。据道琼斯称，相比之下，预计新增就业岗位为21万个，失业率将从1月份的6.3%保持稳定。</blockquote></p><p>As rates jumped, tech shares with high valuations got hit again in the premarket, continuing the pattern this week. Tesla and Peloton shares fell declined.</p><p><blockquote>随着利率飙升，高估值科技股在盘前再次受到打击，本周延续了这一模式。特斯拉和Peloton股价下跌。</blockquote></p><p>The move in futures followed a sharp sell-off on Thursday triggered by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks on rising bond yields. The Fed chair said the recent runup caught his attention but he didn’t give any indication of how the central bank would rein it in. Some investors had expected Powell to signal his willingness to adjust the Fed’s asset purchase program.</p><p><blockquote>周四，美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔关于债券收益率上升的言论引发了期货大幅抛售。美联储主席表示，最近的上涨引起了他的注意，但他没有透露央行将如何控制这种情况。一些投资者原本预计鲍威尔会发出愿意调整美联储资产购买计划的信号。</blockquote></p><p>The economic reopening could “create some upward pressure on prices,” Powell said in a Wall Street Journal webinar Thursday. Even if the economy sees “transitory increases in inflation … I expect that we will be patient,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>鲍威尔周四在《华尔街日报》网络研讨会上表示，经济重新开放可能“给价格带来一些上行压力”。他补充说，即使经济出现“通胀暂时上升……我预计我们也会保持耐心”。</blockquote></p><p>“Equity investors, in our conversations, are really grappling with two things they may not have had to deal with for the last 10 years,” said Tom Lee, Fundstrat’s co-founder head of research. “One is the potential for inflation to actually have to be priced into equities. I think there’s a lot of confusion.”</p><p><blockquote>Fundstrat联合创始人研究主管汤姆·李(Tom Lee)表示：“在我们的对话中，股票投资者确实正在努力解决两件他们在过去10年中可能不必处理的事情。”“一个是通胀实际上必须计入股票价格的可能性。我认为存在很多混乱。”</blockquote></p><p>“Then it’s a bond market that seems to be testing the Fed, which kind of scares people,” added Lee, who believes the sell-off this week is a buying opportunity.</p><p><blockquote>“然后是债券市场似乎在考验美联储，这有点吓人，”Lee补充道，他认为本周的抛售是一个买入机会。</blockquote></p><p>Tech stocks led the market decline Thursday, especially those with high valuations and small or no profitability. The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.1% Thursday, bringing its losses this week to 3.6%. The tech-heavy benchmark also turned negative for the year and fell into correction territory, or down 10% from a recent high, on an intraday basis.</p><p><blockquote>科技股周四领跌市场，尤其是那些估值较高、盈利能力较小或没有盈利能力的股票。纳斯达克综合指数周四下跌2.1%，本周跌幅达到3.6%。以科技股为主的基准指数今年也转为负值，盘中跌入修正区域，较近期高点下跌10%。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla shares were off their lows in Friday premarket trading but still down 0.3%.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价在周五盘前交易中脱离低点，但仍下跌0.3%。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 and the Dow both fell more than 1% Thursday, headed for a losing week. Energy outperformed with a 2.5% gain in the previous session amid a jump in oil prices.</p><p><blockquote>标普500和道琼斯指数周四均下跌超过1%，迎来下跌周。由于油价上涨，能源股表现优于前一交易日，上涨2.5%。</blockquote></p><p>“Rates soared once again, which opened the door for more selling of technology stocks,” said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at LPL Financial. “The bright side is the economy continues to improve and leadership from financials and energy is something that suggests this isn’t a sell everything moment.”</p><p><blockquote>LPL Financial首席市场策略师Ryan Detrick表示：“利率再次飙升，这为科技股的更多抛售打开了大门。”“好的一面是经济持续改善，金融和能源领域的领先地位表明现在不是出售一切的时刻。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stocks open up, as strong jobs report boosts reopening optimism<blockquote>美国股市开盘，强劲的就业报告提振了重新开放的乐观情绪</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stocks open up, as strong jobs report boosts reopening optimism<blockquote>美国股市开盘，强劲的就业报告提振了重新开放的乐观情绪</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-03-05 22:35</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(March 5) Stocks were set to rebound after a stronger-than-expected jobs report boosted optimism about a faster economic reopening.</p><p><blockquote>（3月5日）强于预期的就业报告提振了人们对经济更快重新开放的乐观情绪，股市有望反弹。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow up 0.93%, the S&P 500 rose 1.05%, and the Nasdaq Composite jumped 1.13%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数上涨0.93%，标普500上涨1.05%，纳斯达克综合指数上涨1.13%。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5a0f3bfa9164920f4899e3f22741e69\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"572\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 09:30</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>*来源自Tiger Trade，美国东部时间09:30</span></p></blockquote></p><p>The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield popped above 1.6% after the February jobs report. The Labor Department on Fridayreportedthat nonfarm payrolls jumped by 379,000 for the month and the unemployment rate fell to 6.2%. That compared to expectations of 210,000 new jobs and the unemployment rate to hold steady from the 6.3% rate in January, according to Dow Jones.</p><p><blockquote>2月份就业报告公布后，美国10年期国债收益率跃升至1.6%以上。美国劳工部周五报告称，本月非农就业人数增加37.9万人，失业率降至6.2%。据道琼斯称，相比之下，预计新增就业岗位为21万个，失业率将从1月份的6.3%保持稳定。</blockquote></p><p>As rates jumped, tech shares with high valuations got hit again in the premarket, continuing the pattern this week. Tesla and Peloton shares fell declined.</p><p><blockquote>随着利率飙升，高估值科技股在盘前再次受到打击，本周延续了这一模式。特斯拉和Peloton股价下跌。</blockquote></p><p>The move in futures followed a sharp sell-off on Thursday triggered by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks on rising bond yields. The Fed chair said the recent runup caught his attention but he didn’t give any indication of how the central bank would rein it in. Some investors had expected Powell to signal his willingness to adjust the Fed’s asset purchase program.</p><p><blockquote>周四，美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔关于债券收益率上升的言论引发了期货大幅抛售。美联储主席表示，最近的上涨引起了他的注意，但他没有透露央行将如何控制这种情况。一些投资者原本预计鲍威尔会发出愿意调整美联储资产购买计划的信号。</blockquote></p><p>The economic reopening could “create some upward pressure on prices,” Powell said in a Wall Street Journal webinar Thursday. Even if the economy sees “transitory increases in inflation … I expect that we will be patient,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>鲍威尔周四在《华尔街日报》网络研讨会上表示，经济重新开放可能“给价格带来一些上行压力”。他补充说，即使经济出现“通胀暂时上升……我预计我们也会保持耐心”。</blockquote></p><p>“Equity investors, in our conversations, are really grappling with two things they may not have had to deal with for the last 10 years,” said Tom Lee, Fundstrat’s co-founder head of research. “One is the potential for inflation to actually have to be priced into equities. I think there’s a lot of confusion.”</p><p><blockquote>Fundstrat联合创始人研究主管汤姆·李(Tom Lee)表示：“在我们的对话中，股票投资者确实正在努力解决两件他们在过去10年中可能不必处理的事情。”“一个是通胀实际上必须计入股票价格的可能性。我认为存在很多混乱。”</blockquote></p><p>“Then it’s a bond market that seems to be testing the Fed, which kind of scares people,” added Lee, who believes the sell-off this week is a buying opportunity.</p><p><blockquote>“然后是债券市场似乎在考验美联储，这有点吓人，”Lee补充道，他认为本周的抛售是一个买入机会。</blockquote></p><p>Tech stocks led the market decline Thursday, especially those with high valuations and small or no profitability. The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.1% Thursday, bringing its losses this week to 3.6%. The tech-heavy benchmark also turned negative for the year and fell into correction territory, or down 10% from a recent high, on an intraday basis.</p><p><blockquote>科技股周四领跌市场，尤其是那些估值较高、盈利能力较小或没有盈利能力的股票。纳斯达克综合指数周四下跌2.1%，本周跌幅达到3.6%。以科技股为主的基准指数今年也转为负值，盘中跌入修正区域，较近期高点下跌10%。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla shares were off their lows in Friday premarket trading but still down 0.3%.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价在周五盘前交易中脱离低点，但仍下跌0.3%。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 and the Dow both fell more than 1% Thursday, headed for a losing week. Energy outperformed with a 2.5% gain in the previous session amid a jump in oil prices.</p><p><blockquote>标普500和道琼斯指数周四均下跌超过1%，迎来下跌周。由于油价上涨，能源股表现优于前一交易日，上涨2.5%。</blockquote></p><p>“Rates soared once again, which opened the door for more selling of technology stocks,” said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at LPL Financial. “The bright side is the economy continues to improve and leadership from financials and energy is something that suggests this isn’t a sell everything moment.”</p><p><blockquote>LPL Financial首席市场策略师Ryan Detrick表示：“利率再次飙升，这为科技股的更多抛售打开了大门。”“好的一面是经济持续改善，金融和能源领域的领先地位表明现在不是出售一切的时刻。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1116017255","content_text":"(March 5) Stocks were set to rebound after a stronger-than-expected jobs report boosted optimism about a faster economic reopening.The Dow up 0.93%, the S&P 500 rose 1.05%, and the Nasdaq Composite jumped 1.13%.*Source From Tiger Trade, EST 09:30The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield popped above 1.6% after the February jobs report. The Labor Department on Fridayreportedthat nonfarm payrolls jumped by 379,000 for the month and the unemployment rate fell to 6.2%. That compared to expectations of 210,000 new jobs and the unemployment rate to hold steady from the 6.3% rate in January, according to Dow Jones.As rates jumped, tech shares with high valuations got hit again in the premarket, continuing the pattern this week. Tesla and Peloton shares fell declined.The move in futures followed a sharp sell-off on Thursday triggered by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks on rising bond yields. The Fed chair said the recent runup caught his attention but he didn’t give any indication of how the central bank would rein it in. Some investors had expected Powell to signal his willingness to adjust the Fed’s asset purchase program.The economic reopening could “create some upward pressure on prices,” Powell said in a Wall Street Journal webinar Thursday. Even if the economy sees “transitory increases in inflation … I expect that we will be patient,” he added.“Equity investors, in our conversations, are really grappling with two things they may not have had to deal with for the last 10 years,” said Tom Lee, Fundstrat’s co-founder head of research. “One is the potential for inflation to actually have to be priced into equities. I think there’s a lot of confusion.”“Then it’s a bond market that seems to be testing the Fed, which kind of scares people,” added Lee, who believes the sell-off this week is a buying opportunity.Tech stocks led the market decline Thursday, especially those with high valuations and small or no profitability. The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.1% Thursday, bringing its losses this week to 3.6%. The tech-heavy benchmark also turned negative for the year and fell into correction territory, or down 10% from a recent high, on an intraday basis.Tesla shares were off their lows in Friday premarket trading but still down 0.3%.The S&P 500 and the Dow both fell more than 1% Thursday, headed for a losing week. Energy outperformed with a 2.5% gain in the previous session amid a jump in oil prices.“Rates soared once again, which opened the door for more selling of technology stocks,” said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at LPL Financial. “The bright side is the economy continues to improve and leadership from financials and energy is something that suggests this isn’t a sell everything moment.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1847,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":320480218,"gmtCreate":1615167774134,"gmtModify":1703485095350,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"For the coins. Thanks!","listText":"For the coins. Thanks!","text":"For the coins. Thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/320480218","repostId":"1169596583","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169596583","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1614958557,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169596583?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-05 23:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir plunged more than 13%<blockquote>Palantir暴跌超13%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169596583","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"(March 5) Palantir plunged more than 13%.","content":"<p>(March 5) Palantir plunged more than 13%.</p><p><blockquote>（3月5日）Palantir暴跌超13%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13f756ec57cca85c31b6be070941d7c1\" tg-width=\"1059\" tg-height=\"499\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir plunged more than 13%<blockquote>Palantir暴跌超13%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir plunged more than 13%<blockquote>Palantir暴跌超13%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-03-05 23:35</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(March 5) Palantir plunged more than 13%.</p><p><blockquote>（3月5日）Palantir暴跌超13%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13f756ec57cca85c31b6be070941d7c1\" tg-width=\"1059\" tg-height=\"499\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169596583","content_text":"(March 5) Palantir plunged more than 13%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1310,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":365180559,"gmtCreate":1614702282971,"gmtModify":1703480170613,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/365180559","repostId":"1142281266","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2694,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":385854260,"gmtCreate":1613535044650,"gmtModify":1634553259653,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment. Thanks!","listText":"Like and comment. Thanks!","text":"Like and comment. Thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/385854260","repostId":"1121312034","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121312034","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613530382,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121312034?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-17 10:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Citibank can't get back $500 million it wired by mistake, judge rules<blockquote>法官裁定花旗银行无法收回误汇的5亿美元</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121312034","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business) After committing one of the \"biggest blunders in banking history,\" Citibank ","content":"<p><b>New York (CNN Business) </b>After committing one of the \"biggest blunders in banking history,\" Citibank won't be allowed to recover the almost half a billion dollars it accidentally wired to Revlon's lenders, a US District Court judge ruled.</p><p><blockquote><b>纽约（CNN商业）</b>美国地方法院法官裁定，在犯下“银行业历史上最大的错误”之一后，花旗银行将不被允许收回其意外电汇给露华浓贷方的近5亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>Citibank, which was acting as Revlon's loan agent, meant to send about $8 million in interest payments to the cosmetic company's lenders. Instead, Citibank accidentally wired almost 100 times that amount, including $175 million to a hedge fund. In all,Citi(C)accidentally sent $900 million to Revlon's lenders.</p><p><blockquote>担任露华浓贷款代理的花旗银行打算向该化妆品公司的贷方支付约800万美元的利息。相反，花旗银行意外地电汇了近100倍的金额，其中包括1.75亿美元给一家对冲基金。花旗(C)总共意外地向露华浓的贷方输送了9亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>Citibank filed a lawsuit in August seeking the return of its funds, but it still has not received $500 million from 10 investment advisory firms after the accidental transfer.</p><p><blockquote>花旗银行在8月份提起诉讼，寻求返还其资金，但在意外转移后仍未收到10家投资咨询公司提供的5亿美元。</blockquote></p><p><b>An exception to the rule</b></p><p><blockquote><b>规则的例外</b></blockquote></p><p>The law usually punishes those who spend money accidentally deposited in their accounts. Accidental transfers are common in the digital age, and wires can be paid back instantly. A Pennsylvania couple faced felony charges after spending money accidentally deposited in their account.</p><p><blockquote>法律通常会惩罚那些花掉意外存入账户的钱的人。意外转账在数字时代很常见，电汇可以即时还款。宾夕法尼亚州的一对夫妇在花掉意外存入他们账户的钱后面临重罪指控。</blockquote></p><p>But New York law has exceptions to this rule, known as the \"discharge-for-value-defense.\"</p><p><blockquote>但纽约法律对这一规则有例外，称为“价值免责辩护”。</blockquote></p><p>If the beneficiary is entitled to the money and did not know it was accidentally wired, they can keep it. Revlon lenders said they believed Citibank was wiring prepayments for a loan. After all, the money accidentally wired was the exact amount \"to the penny\" Citibank owed them, although the loan wasn't set to mature for quite some time.</p><p><blockquote>如果受益人有权获得这笔钱，并且不知道这笔钱是意外电汇的，他们可以保留这笔钱。露华浓贷方表示，他们认为花旗银行正在为贷款预付款。毕竟，意外电汇的钱正是花旗银行欠他们的“一分钱一分货”的确切金额，尽管贷款在相当长的一段时间内都不会到期。</blockquote></p><p>\"We are extremely pleased with Judge [Jesse] Furman's thoughtful, thorough and detailed decision,\" said Benjamin Finestone, who represented two lenders, Brigade and HPS Investment Partners.</p><p><blockquote>“我们对[杰西]弗曼法官深思熟虑、彻底和详细的决定感到非常满意，”代表Brigade和HPS Investment Partners两家贷方的本杰明·芬斯通(Benjamin Finestone)表示。</blockquote></p><p><b>'Borderline irrational'</b></p><p><blockquote><b>“边缘非理性”</b></blockquote></p><p>The court ruled the lenders were justified in believing the payment was intentional. Citibank itself did not realize the magnitude of its mistake until nearly a day later.</p><p><blockquote>法院裁定贷款人有理由相信付款是故意的。花旗银行自己直到近一天后才意识到自己错误的严重性。</blockquote></p><p>\"To believe that Citibank, one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world, had made a mistake that had never happened before, to the tune of nearly $1 billion — would have been borderline irrational,\" the court document said.</p><p><blockquote>法庭文件称：“相信花旗银行作为世界上最成熟的金融机构之一，犯下了前所未有的错误，损失金额近10亿美元，这是近乎非理性的。”</blockquote></p><p>The judge's ruling used internal chats between HPS employees as further proof the creditors had no idea the wiring was a mistake until after Citibank sent notices. In the chat, which was dated a day after the mistaken wiring, HPS employees joked about the error:</p><p><blockquote>法官的裁决利用HPS员工之间的内部聊天作为进一步证据，证明债权人直到花旗银行发出通知后才知道线路是错误的。在错误接线一天后的聊天中，HPS员工开玩笑说这个错误：</blockquote></p><p><i>DFREY5: I feel really bad for the person that fat fingered a $900mm erroneous payment. Not a great career move . . . .</i></p><p><blockquote><i>DFREY5：我真的为那个错误支付9亿美元的人感到难过。不是一个伟大的职业发展.....</i></blockquote></p><p><i>JRABINOWIT12: certainly looks like they'll be looking for new people for their Ops group</i></p><p><blockquote><i>JRABINOWIT12：看起来他们肯定会为他们的运营团队寻找新人</i></blockquote></p><p><i>DFREY5: How was work today honey? It was ok, except I accidentally sent $900mm out to people who weren't supposed to have it</i></p><p><blockquote><i>亲爱的，今天工作怎么样？这很好，除了我不小心把9亿美元寄给了不应该拥有它的人</i></blockquote></p><p><i>DFREY5: Downside of work from home. maybe the dog hit the keyboard</i></p><p><blockquote><i>DFREY5：在家工作的缺点。也许是狗撞到了键盘</i></blockquote></p><p>The lenders cannot take the money and run. Since an appeal is a possibility, a temporary restraining order is still in effect.</p><p><blockquote>贷款人不能拿了钱就跑。由于上诉是可能的，临时限制令仍然有效。</blockquote></p><p>\"We strongly disagree with this decision and intend to appeal. We believe we are entitled to the funds and will continue to pursue a complete recovery of them,\" Citigroup said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团在一份声明中表示：“我们强烈反对这一决定，并打算上诉。我们相信我们有权获得这些资金，并将继续寻求完全收回这些资金。”</blockquote></p><p>The pandemic has hurt makeup brands like Revlon(REV), shares of which are trading more than 40% lower from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>疫情伤害了露华浓(REV)等化妆品品牌，其股价较一年前下跌了40%以上。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Citibank can't get back $500 million it wired by mistake, judge rules<blockquote>法官裁定花旗银行无法收回误汇的5亿美元</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCitibank can't get back $500 million it wired by mistake, judge rules<blockquote>法官裁定花旗银行无法收回误汇的5亿美元</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN Business</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-17 10:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>New York (CNN Business) </b>After committing one of the \"biggest blunders in banking history,\" Citibank won't be allowed to recover the almost half a billion dollars it accidentally wired to Revlon's lenders, a US District Court judge ruled.</p><p><blockquote><b>纽约（CNN商业）</b>美国地方法院法官裁定，在犯下“银行业历史上最大的错误”之一后，花旗银行将不被允许收回其意外电汇给露华浓贷方的近5亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>Citibank, which was acting as Revlon's loan agent, meant to send about $8 million in interest payments to the cosmetic company's lenders. Instead, Citibank accidentally wired almost 100 times that amount, including $175 million to a hedge fund. In all,Citi(C)accidentally sent $900 million to Revlon's lenders.</p><p><blockquote>担任露华浓贷款代理的花旗银行打算向该化妆品公司的贷方支付约800万美元的利息。相反，花旗银行意外地电汇了近100倍的金额，其中包括1.75亿美元给一家对冲基金。花旗(C)总共意外地向露华浓的贷方输送了9亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>Citibank filed a lawsuit in August seeking the return of its funds, but it still has not received $500 million from 10 investment advisory firms after the accidental transfer.</p><p><blockquote>花旗银行在8月份提起诉讼，寻求返还其资金，但在意外转移后仍未收到10家投资咨询公司提供的5亿美元。</blockquote></p><p><b>An exception to the rule</b></p><p><blockquote><b>规则的例外</b></blockquote></p><p>The law usually punishes those who spend money accidentally deposited in their accounts. Accidental transfers are common in the digital age, and wires can be paid back instantly. A Pennsylvania couple faced felony charges after spending money accidentally deposited in their account.</p><p><blockquote>法律通常会惩罚那些花掉意外存入账户的钱的人。意外转账在数字时代很常见，电汇可以即时还款。宾夕法尼亚州的一对夫妇在花掉意外存入他们账户的钱后面临重罪指控。</blockquote></p><p>But New York law has exceptions to this rule, known as the \"discharge-for-value-defense.\"</p><p><blockquote>但纽约法律对这一规则有例外，称为“价值免责辩护”。</blockquote></p><p>If the beneficiary is entitled to the money and did not know it was accidentally wired, they can keep it. Revlon lenders said they believed Citibank was wiring prepayments for a loan. After all, the money accidentally wired was the exact amount \"to the penny\" Citibank owed them, although the loan wasn't set to mature for quite some time.</p><p><blockquote>如果受益人有权获得这笔钱，并且不知道这笔钱是意外电汇的，他们可以保留这笔钱。露华浓贷方表示，他们认为花旗银行正在为贷款预付款。毕竟，意外电汇的钱正是花旗银行欠他们的“一分钱一分货”的确切金额，尽管贷款在相当长的一段时间内都不会到期。</blockquote></p><p>\"We are extremely pleased with Judge [Jesse] Furman's thoughtful, thorough and detailed decision,\" said Benjamin Finestone, who represented two lenders, Brigade and HPS Investment Partners.</p><p><blockquote>“我们对[杰西]弗曼法官深思熟虑、彻底和详细的决定感到非常满意，”代表Brigade和HPS Investment Partners两家贷方的本杰明·芬斯通(Benjamin Finestone)表示。</blockquote></p><p><b>'Borderline irrational'</b></p><p><blockquote><b>“边缘非理性”</b></blockquote></p><p>The court ruled the lenders were justified in believing the payment was intentional. Citibank itself did not realize the magnitude of its mistake until nearly a day later.</p><p><blockquote>法院裁定贷款人有理由相信付款是故意的。花旗银行自己直到近一天后才意识到自己错误的严重性。</blockquote></p><p>\"To believe that Citibank, one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world, had made a mistake that had never happened before, to the tune of nearly $1 billion — would have been borderline irrational,\" the court document said.</p><p><blockquote>法庭文件称：“相信花旗银行作为世界上最成熟的金融机构之一，犯下了前所未有的错误，损失金额近10亿美元，这是近乎非理性的。”</blockquote></p><p>The judge's ruling used internal chats between HPS employees as further proof the creditors had no idea the wiring was a mistake until after Citibank sent notices. In the chat, which was dated a day after the mistaken wiring, HPS employees joked about the error:</p><p><blockquote>法官的裁决利用HPS员工之间的内部聊天作为进一步证据，证明债权人直到花旗银行发出通知后才知道线路是错误的。在错误接线一天后的聊天中，HPS员工开玩笑说这个错误：</blockquote></p><p><i>DFREY5: I feel really bad for the person that fat fingered a $900mm erroneous payment. Not a great career move . . . .</i></p><p><blockquote><i>DFREY5：我真的为那个错误支付9亿美元的人感到难过。不是一个伟大的职业发展.....</i></blockquote></p><p><i>JRABINOWIT12: certainly looks like they'll be looking for new people for their Ops group</i></p><p><blockquote><i>JRABINOWIT12：看起来他们肯定会为他们的运营团队寻找新人</i></blockquote></p><p><i>DFREY5: How was work today honey? It was ok, except I accidentally sent $900mm out to people who weren't supposed to have it</i></p><p><blockquote><i>亲爱的，今天工作怎么样？这很好，除了我不小心把9亿美元寄给了不应该拥有它的人</i></blockquote></p><p><i>DFREY5: Downside of work from home. maybe the dog hit the keyboard</i></p><p><blockquote><i>DFREY5：在家工作的缺点。也许是狗撞到了键盘</i></blockquote></p><p>The lenders cannot take the money and run. Since an appeal is a possibility, a temporary restraining order is still in effect.</p><p><blockquote>贷款人不能拿了钱就跑。由于上诉是可能的，临时限制令仍然有效。</blockquote></p><p>\"We strongly disagree with this decision and intend to appeal. We believe we are entitled to the funds and will continue to pursue a complete recovery of them,\" Citigroup said in a statement.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团在一份声明中表示：“我们强烈反对这一决定，并打算上诉。我们相信我们有权获得这些资金，并将继续寻求完全收回这些资金。”</blockquote></p><p>The pandemic has hurt makeup brands like Revlon(REV), shares of which are trading more than 40% lower from a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>疫情伤害了露华浓(REV)等化妆品品牌，其股价较一年前下跌了40%以上。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/16/business/citibank-revlon-lawsuit-ruling/index.html\">CNN Business</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"C":"花旗"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/16/business/citibank-revlon-lawsuit-ruling/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121312034","content_text":"New York (CNN Business) After committing one of the \"biggest blunders in banking history,\" Citibank won't be allowed to recover the almost half a billion dollars it accidentally wired to Revlon's lenders, a US District Court judge ruled.Citibank, which was acting as Revlon's loan agent, meant to send about $8 million in interest payments to the cosmetic company's lenders. Instead, Citibank accidentally wired almost 100 times that amount, including $175 million to a hedge fund. In all,Citi(C)accidentally sent $900 million to Revlon's lenders.Citibank filed a lawsuit in August seeking the return of its funds, but it still has not received $500 million from 10 investment advisory firms after the accidental transfer.An exception to the ruleThe law usually punishes those who spend money accidentally deposited in their accounts. Accidental transfers are common in the digital age, and wires can be paid back instantly. A Pennsylvania couple faced felony charges after spending money accidentally deposited in their account.But New York law has exceptions to this rule, known as the \"discharge-for-value-defense.\"If the beneficiary is entitled to the money and did not know it was accidentally wired, they can keep it. Revlon lenders said they believed Citibank was wiring prepayments for a loan. After all, the money accidentally wired was the exact amount \"to the penny\" Citibank owed them, although the loan wasn't set to mature for quite some time.\"We are extremely pleased with Judge [Jesse] Furman's thoughtful, thorough and detailed decision,\" said Benjamin Finestone, who represented two lenders, Brigade and HPS Investment Partners.'Borderline irrational'The court ruled the lenders were justified in believing the payment was intentional. Citibank itself did not realize the magnitude of its mistake until nearly a day later.\"To believe that Citibank, one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world, had made a mistake that had never happened before, to the tune of nearly $1 billion — would have been borderline irrational,\" the court document said.The judge's ruling used internal chats between HPS employees as further proof the creditors had no idea the wiring was a mistake until after Citibank sent notices. In the chat, which was dated a day after the mistaken wiring, HPS employees joked about the error:DFREY5: I feel really bad for the person that fat fingered a $900mm erroneous payment. Not a great career move . . . .JRABINOWIT12: certainly looks like they'll be looking for new people for their Ops groupDFREY5: How was work today honey? It was ok, except I accidentally sent $900mm out to people who weren't supposed to have itDFREY5: Downside of work from home. maybe the dog hit the keyboardThe lenders cannot take the money and run. Since an appeal is a possibility, a temporary restraining order is still in effect.\"We strongly disagree with this decision and intend to appeal. We believe we are entitled to the funds and will continue to pursue a complete recovery of them,\" Citigroup said in a statement.The pandemic has hurt makeup brands like Revlon(REV), shares of which are trading more than 40% lower from a year ago.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"REV":0.9,"C":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2155,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":385854844,"gmtCreate":1613534979788,"gmtModify":1634553259775,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"For the coins!","listText":"For the coins!","text":"For the coins!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/385854844","repostId":"1106575642","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106575642","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613532872,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106575642?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-17 11:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106575642","media":"Barrons","summary":"Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die.\nNow Japanese c","content":"<p>Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die.</p><p><blockquote>关于苹果生产的全电动自动驾驶汽车的猜测不会消失。</blockquote></p><p> Now Japanese car maker Nissan Motor(ticker: 7201.Japan) has denied reports that it is in talks to be the builder of an Apple-branded vehicle. The iCar has resulted in a lot of Wall Street research reports, but few hard numbers about what an Apple(AAPL) entry might mean for the global car business. What’s more, tech and car analysts have slightly different takes on what the Apple car means.</p><p><blockquote>现在，日本汽车制造商日产汽车（股票代码：7201.Japan）否认了有关其正在洽谈成为苹果品牌汽车制造商的报道。iCar引发了许多华尔街研究报告，但关于苹果(AAPL)的加入对全球汽车行业可能意味着什么的确切数据却很少。更重要的是，科技和汽车分析师对苹果汽车的含义有着略有不同的看法。</blockquote></p><p> News of a potential Apple car surfaced in December. Those reports were taken seriously by both tech and car analysts because Apple has had car ambitions stretching back years—and because Apple is huge. The tech giant has a market capitalization roughly equal to the market cap of all car makers on the globe, combined. That includes the most valuable car company on the planet:Tesla(TSLA).</p><p><blockquote>去年12月，有关潜在苹果汽车的消息浮出水面。这些报告受到了科技和汽车分析师的重视，因为苹果多年来就有汽车雄心，而且苹果规模巨大。这家科技巨头的市值大致相当于全球所有汽车制造商的市值总和。其中包括全球最有价值的汽车公司：特斯拉（TSLA）。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai Motor(005380.Korea),Kia Motors(000270.Korea), as well as U.S. EVstart-up Canoo(GOEV), have all been tied to Apple in reports. Nissan is the latest car company to be linked. Nissan stock fell almost 3% Monday after Reuters reported Nissan’s denial it was working with Apple.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车（005380.韩国）、起亚汽车（000270.韩国）以及美国。电动汽车初创公司Canoo(GOEV)在报道中都与苹果有联系。日产是最新一家被联系的汽车公司。路透社报道日产否认与苹果合作后，日产股价周一下跌近3%。</blockquote></p><p> Apple, and the car companies, haven’t commented on Apple’s car plans. Apple wasn’t immediately available to comment on Nissan reports on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果和汽车公司尚未对苹果的汽车计划发表评论。周二，苹果没有立即对日产的报道发表评论。</blockquote></p><p> Outside of temporary impacts on car companies directly linked to Apple, car stocks aren’t really reacting to iCar news. Crying wolf is one reason: Nothing concrete has come from repeated speculation. And of course, an Apple car would be years away—another reason auto investors aren’t too concerned for the moment.</p><p><blockquote>除了对与苹果直接相关的汽车公司的暂时影响之外，汽车股并没有对iCar新闻做出真正的反应。狼来了是一个原因：反复的猜测没有任何具体的结果。当然，苹果汽车还需要数年时间——这是汽车投资者目前不太担心的另一个原因。</blockquote></p><p> That doesn’t mean an Apple car won’t matter, or that news of potential partnerships can be discounted. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives expects a formal announcement in 2021. “At this point it’s a matter of when, not if, Apple will enter the EV race over the next few years,” wrote Ives in a Monday research report. He assigns an 85% probability that Apple will make an announcement in three to six months and calls Hyundai and Volkswagen(VOW.Germany) his top two choices for an Apple partnership.</p><p><blockquote>这并不意味着苹果汽车不重要，或者潜在合作伙伴关系的消息可以打折扣。Wedbush分析师Dan Ives预计将于2021年正式宣布。Ives在周一的一份研究报告中写道：“在这一点上，苹果是否会在未来几年内进入电动汽车竞赛只是一个时间问题，而不是是否会。”他认为苹果有85%的可能性将在三到六个月内宣布这一消息，而评级现代和大众汽车(VOW.Germany)是他与苹果合作的两个首选。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai has its own modular EV platform. That’s one reason Ives likes Hyundai as a possibility, although other auto makers, including General Motors(GM), have similar approaches to electric-vehicle development. Volkswagen, for its part, has big EV ambitions. It is also a large shareholder of QuantumScape(QS), which is pioneering solid-state, lithium anode EV batteries. Those batteries promise lower cost, better safety, faster charging, and more range. Both things could make Volkswagen attractive to a partner.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车拥有自己的模块化电动汽车平台。这就是艾夫斯喜欢现代汽车的原因之一，尽管包括通用汽车(GM)在内的其他汽车制造商也有类似的电动汽车开发方法。就大众汽车而言，它有着远大的电动汽车雄心。它还是QuantumScape(QS)的大股东，该公司是固态锂阳极电动汽车电池的先驱。这些电池承诺成本更低、安全性更好、充电更快、续航里程更长。这两件事都可能使大众汽车对合作伙伴具有吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> Ives covers mainly technology stocks. He covers Apple, rating shares outperform and has a $175 price target for shares. He also covers Telsa stock, rating shares Hold with a $950 price target for shares. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, covers both as well. He rates Apple stock Hold and has a $132 price target for shares. He is more bearish on Tesla though. He believes an Apple car would make it harder for Tesla to meet its volume growth goal of 50% a year on average for the next few years. “The automotive market has historically been highly fragmented, with strong regional brands and preferences,” wrote Sacconaghi in a recent research report. “It is uncertain to us that amid massive new competition and entry, the market will ultimately become more consolidated and/or have one outsized winner.”</p><p><blockquote>艾夫斯主要涵盖科技股。他关注苹果，将其股票评级为跑赢大盘，并将其股票目标价定为175美元。他还关注了Telsa股票，评级为持有，目标价为950美元。伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉(Toni Sacconaghi)也涵盖了这两者。他对苹果股票的评级为持有，目标价为132美元。不过，他更看跌特斯拉。他认为，苹果汽车将使特斯拉更难实现未来几年平均每年50%的销量增长目标。萨科纳吉在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“汽车市场历来高度分散，具有强大的区域品牌和偏好。”“我们不确定在大规模的新竞争和进入中，市场最终会变得更加整合和/或出现一个巨大的赢家。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s bad news for Tesla in his mind. He rates Tesla shares Sell and has a $180 price target for the stock, well below where shares are trading.</p><p><blockquote>在他看来，这对特斯拉来说是个坏消息。他将特斯拉股票评级为卖出，并将该股的目标价定为180美元，远低于该股的交易价格。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas covers cars and not Apple. But he is bullish on Tesla stock, rating shares Buy with an $880 price target. An Apple car entry could speed EV penetration, which would benefit all EV makers. In addition, Tesla “can iterate industry-leading battery technology for another four or five years before Apple may be on the scene,” wrote Jonas in a recent research report. “But at some point, today’s EV players must share the sandbox.”</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师Adam Jonas关注的是汽车，而不是苹果。但他看好特斯拉股票，给予该股买入评级，目标价为880美元。苹果汽车的进入可能会加速电动汽车的渗透，这将使所有电动汽车制造商受益。此外，Jonas在最近的一份研究报告中写道，特斯拉“在苹果可能出现之前，还可以再迭代四五年行业领先的电池技术”。“但在某些时候，今天的电动汽车玩家必须共享沙盒。”</blockquote></p><p> More EV players, however, aren’t enough to shake his confidence in Tesla stock. In addition to Tesla, Jonas recommends stock in GM and supplier Aptiv(APTV) to get exposure to the EV theme.</p><p><blockquote>然而，更多的电动汽车玩家并不足以动摇他对特斯拉股票的信心。除了特斯拉之外，Jonas还推荐通用汽车和供应商Aptiv(APTV)的股票来投资电动汽车主题。</blockquote></p><p> RBC analyst Joe Spak also covers car stocks. He, like Jonas, rates GM and Aptiv stock Buy but rates Tesla stock Hold. The emergence of an Apple car, for Spak, highlights the need for car makers to adapt at faster rates. “Otherwise they could get left behind, whether it’s by Apple or someone else,” wrote Spak in a recent research report.</p><p><blockquote>加拿大皇家银行分析师乔·斯帕克也关注汽车股。与Jonas一样，他将通用汽车和Aptiv股票评级为买入，但将特斯拉股票评级为持有。对于斯帕克来说，苹果汽车的出现凸显了汽车制造商以更快的速度适应的必要性。斯帕克在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“否则他们可能会被抛在后面，无论是被苹果还是其他人。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Overall, Wall Street appears to believe few things about the iCar: It will be a premium self-driving product, and will be built by an existing auto maker. It is good news for Apple stock, but it might not be that disruptive to the existing industry—initial volumes will be small, and it will boost consumer interest in EVs. What’s more, news of an Apple car will drive incumbents to improve. Time will tell if that turns out to be how the industry develops.</p><p><blockquote>总体而言，华尔街似乎不太相信iCar：它将是一款优质的自动驾驶产品，并将由现有汽车制造商制造。这对苹果股票来说是个好消息，但对现有行业来说可能不会有那么大的颠覆性——初始销量会很小，但会提高消费者对电动汽车的兴趣。更重要的是，苹果汽车的消息将推动现有汽车的改进。时间会证明这是否是该行业的发展方式。</blockquote></p><p> Apple car news, again, doesn’t appear to be hitting stocks all that much. Tesla stock is down 2.4% on Tuesday. Apple stock is down 1.6%. The S&P 500,for comparison, is down about 0.1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up about 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>苹果汽车新闻似乎并没有对股市造成太大影响。特斯拉股价周二下跌2.4%。苹果股价下跌1.6%。相比之下，标准普尔500指数下跌约0.1%，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约0.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-17 11:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die.</p><p><blockquote>关于苹果生产的全电动自动驾驶汽车的猜测不会消失。</blockquote></p><p> Now Japanese car maker Nissan Motor(ticker: 7201.Japan) has denied reports that it is in talks to be the builder of an Apple-branded vehicle. The iCar has resulted in a lot of Wall Street research reports, but few hard numbers about what an Apple(AAPL) entry might mean for the global car business. What’s more, tech and car analysts have slightly different takes on what the Apple car means.</p><p><blockquote>现在，日本汽车制造商日产汽车（股票代码：7201.Japan）否认了有关其正在洽谈成为苹果品牌汽车制造商的报道。iCar引发了许多华尔街研究报告，但关于苹果(AAPL)的加入对全球汽车行业可能意味着什么的确切数据却很少。更重要的是，科技和汽车分析师对苹果汽车的含义有着略有不同的看法。</blockquote></p><p> News of a potential Apple car surfaced in December. Those reports were taken seriously by both tech and car analysts because Apple has had car ambitions stretching back years—and because Apple is huge. The tech giant has a market capitalization roughly equal to the market cap of all car makers on the globe, combined. That includes the most valuable car company on the planet:Tesla(TSLA).</p><p><blockquote>去年12月，有关潜在苹果汽车的消息浮出水面。这些报告受到了科技和汽车分析师的重视，因为苹果多年来就有汽车雄心，而且苹果规模巨大。这家科技巨头的市值大致相当于全球所有汽车制造商的市值总和。其中包括全球最有价值的汽车公司：特斯拉（TSLA）。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai Motor(005380.Korea),Kia Motors(000270.Korea), as well as U.S. EVstart-up Canoo(GOEV), have all been tied to Apple in reports. Nissan is the latest car company to be linked. Nissan stock fell almost 3% Monday after Reuters reported Nissan’s denial it was working with Apple.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车（005380.韩国）、起亚汽车（000270.韩国）以及美国。电动汽车初创公司Canoo(GOEV)在报道中都与苹果有联系。日产是最新一家被联系的汽车公司。路透社报道日产否认与苹果合作后，日产股价周一下跌近3%。</blockquote></p><p> Apple, and the car companies, haven’t commented on Apple’s car plans. Apple wasn’t immediately available to comment on Nissan reports on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果和汽车公司尚未对苹果的汽车计划发表评论。周二，苹果没有立即对日产的报道发表评论。</blockquote></p><p> Outside of temporary impacts on car companies directly linked to Apple, car stocks aren’t really reacting to iCar news. Crying wolf is one reason: Nothing concrete has come from repeated speculation. And of course, an Apple car would be years away—another reason auto investors aren’t too concerned for the moment.</p><p><blockquote>除了对与苹果直接相关的汽车公司的暂时影响之外，汽车股并没有对iCar新闻做出真正的反应。狼来了是一个原因：反复的猜测没有任何具体的结果。当然，苹果汽车还需要数年时间——这是汽车投资者目前不太担心的另一个原因。</blockquote></p><p> That doesn’t mean an Apple car won’t matter, or that news of potential partnerships can be discounted. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives expects a formal announcement in 2021. “At this point it’s a matter of when, not if, Apple will enter the EV race over the next few years,” wrote Ives in a Monday research report. He assigns an 85% probability that Apple will make an announcement in three to six months and calls Hyundai and Volkswagen(VOW.Germany) his top two choices for an Apple partnership.</p><p><blockquote>这并不意味着苹果汽车不重要，或者潜在合作伙伴关系的消息可以打折扣。Wedbush分析师Dan Ives预计将于2021年正式宣布。Ives在周一的一份研究报告中写道：“在这一点上，苹果是否会在未来几年内进入电动汽车竞赛只是一个时间问题，而不是是否会。”他认为苹果有85%的可能性将在三到六个月内宣布这一消息，而评级现代和大众汽车(VOW.Germany)是他与苹果合作的两个首选。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai has its own modular EV platform. That’s one reason Ives likes Hyundai as a possibility, although other auto makers, including General Motors(GM), have similar approaches to electric-vehicle development. Volkswagen, for its part, has big EV ambitions. It is also a large shareholder of QuantumScape(QS), which is pioneering solid-state, lithium anode EV batteries. Those batteries promise lower cost, better safety, faster charging, and more range. Both things could make Volkswagen attractive to a partner.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车拥有自己的模块化电动汽车平台。这就是艾夫斯喜欢现代汽车的原因之一，尽管包括通用汽车(GM)在内的其他汽车制造商也有类似的电动汽车开发方法。就大众汽车而言，它有着远大的电动汽车雄心。它还是QuantumScape(QS)的大股东，该公司是固态锂阳极电动汽车电池的先驱。这些电池承诺成本更低、安全性更好、充电更快、续航里程更长。这两件事都可能使大众汽车对合作伙伴具有吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> Ives covers mainly technology stocks. He covers Apple, rating shares outperform and has a $175 price target for shares. He also covers Telsa stock, rating shares Hold with a $950 price target for shares. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, covers both as well. He rates Apple stock Hold and has a $132 price target for shares. He is more bearish on Tesla though. He believes an Apple car would make it harder for Tesla to meet its volume growth goal of 50% a year on average for the next few years. “The automotive market has historically been highly fragmented, with strong regional brands and preferences,” wrote Sacconaghi in a recent research report. “It is uncertain to us that amid massive new competition and entry, the market will ultimately become more consolidated and/or have one outsized winner.”</p><p><blockquote>艾夫斯主要涵盖科技股。他关注苹果，将其股票评级为跑赢大盘，并将其股票目标价定为175美元。他还关注了Telsa股票，评级为持有，目标价为950美元。伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉(Toni Sacconaghi)也涵盖了这两者。他对苹果股票的评级为持有，目标价为132美元。不过，他更看跌特斯拉。他认为，苹果汽车将使特斯拉更难实现未来几年平均每年50%的销量增长目标。萨科纳吉在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“汽车市场历来高度分散，具有强大的区域品牌和偏好。”“我们不确定在大规模的新竞争和进入中，市场最终会变得更加整合和/或出现一个巨大的赢家。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s bad news for Tesla in his mind. He rates Tesla shares Sell and has a $180 price target for the stock, well below where shares are trading.</p><p><blockquote>在他看来，这对特斯拉来说是个坏消息。他将特斯拉股票评级为卖出，并将该股的目标价定为180美元，远低于该股的交易价格。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas covers cars and not Apple. But he is bullish on Tesla stock, rating shares Buy with an $880 price target. An Apple car entry could speed EV penetration, which would benefit all EV makers. In addition, Tesla “can iterate industry-leading battery technology for another four or five years before Apple may be on the scene,” wrote Jonas in a recent research report. “But at some point, today’s EV players must share the sandbox.”</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师Adam Jonas关注的是汽车，而不是苹果。但他看好特斯拉股票，给予该股买入评级，目标价为880美元。苹果汽车的进入可能会加速电动汽车的渗透，这将使所有电动汽车制造商受益。此外，Jonas在最近的一份研究报告中写道，特斯拉“在苹果可能出现之前，还可以再迭代四五年行业领先的电池技术”。“但在某些时候，今天的电动汽车玩家必须共享沙盒。”</blockquote></p><p> More EV players, however, aren’t enough to shake his confidence in Tesla stock. In addition to Tesla, Jonas recommends stock in GM and supplier Aptiv(APTV) to get exposure to the EV theme.</p><p><blockquote>然而，更多的电动汽车玩家并不足以动摇他对特斯拉股票的信心。除了特斯拉之外，Jonas还推荐通用汽车和供应商Aptiv(APTV)的股票来投资电动汽车主题。</blockquote></p><p> RBC analyst Joe Spak also covers car stocks. He, like Jonas, rates GM and Aptiv stock Buy but rates Tesla stock Hold. The emergence of an Apple car, for Spak, highlights the need for car makers to adapt at faster rates. “Otherwise they could get left behind, whether it’s by Apple or someone else,” wrote Spak in a recent research report.</p><p><blockquote>加拿大皇家银行分析师乔·斯帕克也关注汽车股。与Jonas一样，他将通用汽车和Aptiv股票评级为买入，但将特斯拉股票评级为持有。对于斯帕克来说，苹果汽车的出现凸显了汽车制造商以更快的速度适应的必要性。斯帕克在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“否则他们可能会被抛在后面，无论是被苹果还是其他人。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Overall, Wall Street appears to believe few things about the iCar: It will be a premium self-driving product, and will be built by an existing auto maker. It is good news for Apple stock, but it might not be that disruptive to the existing industry—initial volumes will be small, and it will boost consumer interest in EVs. What’s more, news of an Apple car will drive incumbents to improve. Time will tell if that turns out to be how the industry develops.</p><p><blockquote>总体而言，华尔街似乎不太相信iCar：它将是一款优质的自动驾驶产品，并将由现有汽车制造商制造。这对苹果股票来说是个好消息，但对现有行业来说可能不会有那么大的颠覆性——初始销量会很小，但会提高消费者对电动汽车的兴趣。更重要的是，苹果汽车的消息将推动现有汽车的改进。时间会证明这是否是该行业的发展方式。</blockquote></p><p> Apple car news, again, doesn’t appear to be hitting stocks all that much. Tesla stock is down 2.4% on Tuesday. Apple stock is down 1.6%. The S&P 500,for comparison, is down about 0.1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up about 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>苹果汽车新闻似乎并没有对股市造成太大影响。特斯拉股价周二下跌2.4%。苹果股价下跌1.6%。相比之下，标准普尔500指数下跌约0.1%，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约0.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-icar-ev-speculation-nissan-tesla-51613492754?mod=hp_LEAD_4\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-icar-ev-speculation-nissan-tesla-51613492754?mod=hp_LEAD_4","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106575642","content_text":"Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die.\nNow Japanese car maker Nissan Motor(ticker: 7201.Japan) has denied reports that it is in talks to be the builder of an Apple-branded vehicle. The iCar has resulted in a lot of Wall Street research reports, but few hard numbers about what an Apple(AAPL) entry might mean for the global car business. What’s more, tech and car analysts have slightly different takes on what the Apple car means.\nNews of a potential Apple car surfaced in December. Those reports were taken seriously by both tech and car analysts because Apple has had car ambitions stretching back years—and because Apple is huge. The tech giant has a market capitalization roughly equal to the market cap of all car makers on the globe, combined. That includes the most valuable car company on the planet:Tesla(TSLA).\nHyundai Motor(005380.Korea),Kia Motors(000270.Korea), as well as U.S. EVstart-up Canoo(GOEV), have all been tied to Apple in reports. Nissan is the latest car company to be linked. Nissan stock fell almost 3% Monday after Reuters reported Nissan’s denial it was working with Apple.\nApple, and the car companies, haven’t commented on Apple’s car plans. Apple wasn’t immediately available to comment on Nissan reports on Tuesday.\nOutside of temporary impacts on car companies directly linked to Apple, car stocks aren’t really reacting to iCar news. Crying wolf is one reason: Nothing concrete has come from repeated speculation. And of course, an Apple car would be years away—another reason auto investors aren’t too concerned for the moment.\nThat doesn’t mean an Apple car won’t matter, or that news of potential partnerships can be discounted. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives expects a formal announcement in 2021. “At this point it’s a matter of when, not if, Apple will enter the EV race over the next few years,” wrote Ives in a Monday research report. He assigns an 85% probability that Apple will make an announcement in three to six months and calls Hyundai and Volkswagen(VOW.Germany) his top two choices for an Apple partnership.\nHyundai has its own modular EV platform. That’s one reason Ives likes Hyundai as a possibility, although other auto makers, including General Motors(GM), have similar approaches to electric-vehicle development. Volkswagen, for its part, has big EV ambitions. It is also a large shareholder of QuantumScape(QS), which is pioneering solid-state, lithium anode EV batteries. Those batteries promise lower cost, better safety, faster charging, and more range. Both things could make Volkswagen attractive to a partner.\nIves covers mainly technology stocks. He covers Apple, rating shares outperform and has a $175 price target for shares. He also covers Telsa stock, rating shares Hold with a $950 price target for shares. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, covers both as well. He rates Apple stock Hold and has a $132 price target for shares. He is more bearish on Tesla though. He believes an Apple car would make it harder for Tesla to meet its volume growth goal of 50% a year on average for the next few years. “The automotive market has historically been highly fragmented, with strong regional brands and preferences,” wrote Sacconaghi in a recent research report. “It is uncertain to us that amid massive new competition and entry, the market will ultimately become more consolidated and/or have one outsized winner.”\nThat’s bad news for Tesla in his mind. He rates Tesla shares Sell and has a $180 price target for the stock, well below where shares are trading.\nMorgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas covers cars and not Apple. But he is bullish on Tesla stock, rating shares Buy with an $880 price target. An Apple car entry could speed EV penetration, which would benefit all EV makers. In addition, Tesla “can iterate industry-leading battery technology for another four or five years before Apple may be on the scene,” wrote Jonas in a recent research report. “But at some point, today’s EV players must share the sandbox.”\nMore EV players, however, aren’t enough to shake his confidence in Tesla stock. In addition to Tesla, Jonas recommends stock in GM and supplier Aptiv(APTV) to get exposure to the EV theme.\nRBC analyst Joe Spak also covers car stocks. He, like Jonas, rates GM and Aptiv stock Buy but rates Tesla stock Hold. The emergence of an Apple car, for Spak, highlights the need for car makers to adapt at faster rates. “Otherwise they could get left behind, whether it’s by Apple or someone else,” wrote Spak in a recent research report.\nOverall, Wall Street appears to believe few things about the iCar: It will be a premium self-driving product, and will be built by an existing auto maker. It is good news for Apple stock, but it might not be that disruptive to the existing industry—initial volumes will be small, and it will boost consumer interest in EVs. What’s more, news of an Apple car will drive incumbents to improve. Time will tell if that turns out to be how the industry develops.\nApple car news, again, doesn’t appear to be hitting stocks all that much. Tesla stock is down 2.4% on Tuesday. Apple stock is down 1.6%. The S&P 500,for comparison, is down about 0.1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up about 0.2%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GM":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1528,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":382535652,"gmtCreate":1613465629776,"gmtModify":1634553578823,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"For the likes! <3","listText":"For the likes! <3","text":"For the likes! <3","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/382535652","repostId":"1168066718","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1630,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317194236,"gmtCreate":1612426304525,"gmtModify":1703761656134,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"For the coins [微笑] ","listText":"For the coins [微笑] ","text":"For the coins [微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317194236","repostId":"1189978299","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189978299","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612417224,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1189978299?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-04 13:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Emerging Markets May Already Have Reached Their Peak for 2021, Morgan Stanley Says<blockquote>摩根士丹利表示，新兴市场可能已经在2021年达到顶峰</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189978299","media":"marketwatch","summary":"It’s a little early in the year to be discussing peaks, but the top may have come and gone for a pop","content":"<p>It’s a little early in the year to be discussing peaks, but the top may have come and gone for a popular emerging-markets index, according to strategists atMorgan Stanley.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利策略师表示，今年讨论峰值还为时过早，但对于一个受欢迎的新兴市场指数来说，峰值可能已经来来去去。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley strategists, led by Jonathan Garner, say theMSCI emerging market indexalready topped its year-end target of 1,330, though it has fallen back subsequently. Flows to the region hit an all-time high last week. “Euphoric” fund inflows have invariably been associated with market tops, and vice versa, they note.</p><p><blockquote>以乔纳森·加纳(Jonathan Garner)为首的摩根士丹利策略师表示，摩根士丹利新兴市场指数已突破年终目标1,330点，但随后有所回落。上周流向该地区的资金创下历史新高。他们指出，“欣快”的资金流入总是与市场顶部相关，反之亦然。</blockquote></p><p> Already a Top?MSCI Emerging Markets Index USDSource: FactSetSept. 2020'21100011001200130014001500</p><p><blockquote>已经是上衣了？MSCI新兴市场指数美元资料来源：FactSetSept。2020'21100011001200130014001500</blockquote></p><p> They list a number of factors why the index may have peaked. For one, thecopperprice is correcting, and that has a strong correlation with the index. Another is that central bank balance sheet growth of the G4 — the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japanand the European Central Bank — is likely to peak next month at over 50% growth, and then start to slow significantly. A measure of liquidity in China also is dropping off.</p><p><blockquote>他们列出了该指数可能见顶的许多因素。首先，铜价正在调整，这与指数有很强的相关性。另一个原因是，四国集团（美联储、英国央行、日本央行和欧洲央行）的央行资产负债表增长可能会在下个月达到50%以上的峰值，然后开始显着放缓。中国的流动性也在下降。</blockquote></p><p> The break-even inflation rate also peaked, in late January, and is now correcting, they add, which suggests a top in near term sentiment on reflation and reopening. Thedollar,which tends to move in the opposite direction to emerging markets, has stopped declining.</p><p><blockquote>他们补充说，盈亏平衡通胀率也在一月底达到顶峰，目前正在修正，这表明近期对通货再膨胀和重新开放的情绪已见顶。往往与新兴市场走势相反的美元已经停止下跌。</blockquote></p><p> There are reasons closer to home for why the index may have peaked. Earnings revisions are showing signs of stalling out. Also, South Korea’s relative performance peaked on Jan. 11, after outperforming by 41% since Mar. 19, 2020. Major peaks in South Korea’s relative performance tend to precede peaks in the broader index, the strategists say.</p><p><blockquote>该指数可能已经见顶的原因还有更接近国内的原因。盈利修正显示出停滞的迹象。此外，韩国的相对表现在1月11日达到顶峰，自2020年3月19日以来跑赢了41%。策略师表示，韩国相对表现的主要峰值往往先于更广泛指数的峰值。</blockquote></p><p> TheiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETFtracks the emerging-market index.</p><p><blockquote>iShares MSCI新兴市场ETF追踪新兴市场指数。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Emerging Markets May Already Have Reached Their Peak for 2021, Morgan Stanley Says<blockquote>摩根士丹利表示，新兴市场可能已经在2021年达到顶峰</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEmerging Markets May Already Have Reached Their Peak for 2021, Morgan Stanley Says<blockquote>摩根士丹利表示，新兴市场可能已经在2021年达到顶峰</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-04 13:40</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It’s a little early in the year to be discussing peaks, but the top may have come and gone for a popular emerging-markets index, according to strategists atMorgan Stanley.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利策略师表示，今年讨论峰值还为时过早，但对于一个受欢迎的新兴市场指数来说，峰值可能已经来来去去。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley strategists, led by Jonathan Garner, say theMSCI emerging market indexalready topped its year-end target of 1,330, though it has fallen back subsequently. Flows to the region hit an all-time high last week. “Euphoric” fund inflows have invariably been associated with market tops, and vice versa, they note.</p><p><blockquote>以乔纳森·加纳(Jonathan Garner)为首的摩根士丹利策略师表示，摩根士丹利新兴市场指数已突破年终目标1,330点，但随后有所回落。上周流向该地区的资金创下历史新高。他们指出，“欣快”的资金流入总是与市场顶部相关，反之亦然。</blockquote></p><p> Already a Top?MSCI Emerging Markets Index USDSource: FactSetSept. 2020'21100011001200130014001500</p><p><blockquote>已经是上衣了？MSCI新兴市场指数美元资料来源：FactSetSept。2020'21100011001200130014001500</blockquote></p><p> They list a number of factors why the index may have peaked. For one, thecopperprice is correcting, and that has a strong correlation with the index. Another is that central bank balance sheet growth of the G4 — the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japanand the European Central Bank — is likely to peak next month at over 50% growth, and then start to slow significantly. A measure of liquidity in China also is dropping off.</p><p><blockquote>他们列出了该指数可能见顶的许多因素。首先，铜价正在调整，这与指数有很强的相关性。另一个原因是，四国集团（美联储、英国央行、日本央行和欧洲央行）的央行资产负债表增长可能会在下个月达到50%以上的峰值，然后开始显着放缓。中国的流动性也在下降。</blockquote></p><p> The break-even inflation rate also peaked, in late January, and is now correcting, they add, which suggests a top in near term sentiment on reflation and reopening. Thedollar,which tends to move in the opposite direction to emerging markets, has stopped declining.</p><p><blockquote>他们补充说，盈亏平衡通胀率也在一月底达到顶峰，目前正在修正，这表明近期对通货再膨胀和重新开放的情绪已见顶。往往与新兴市场走势相反的美元已经停止下跌。</blockquote></p><p> There are reasons closer to home for why the index may have peaked. Earnings revisions are showing signs of stalling out. Also, South Korea’s relative performance peaked on Jan. 11, after outperforming by 41% since Mar. 19, 2020. Major peaks in South Korea’s relative performance tend to precede peaks in the broader index, the strategists say.</p><p><blockquote>该指数可能已经见顶的原因还有更接近国内的原因。盈利修正显示出停滞的迹象。此外，韩国的相对表现在1月11日达到顶峰，自2020年3月19日以来跑赢了41%。策略师表示，韩国相对表现的主要峰值往往先于更广泛指数的峰值。</blockquote></p><p> TheiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETFtracks the emerging-market index.</p><p><blockquote>iShares MSCI新兴市场ETF追踪新兴市场指数。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/emerging-markets-may-already-have-reached-their-peak-for-2021-morgan-stanley-says-51612361255?mod=home-page\">marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/24fa8350588843d92f819ac12ab5ce16","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/emerging-markets-may-already-have-reached-their-peak-for-2021-morgan-stanley-says-51612361255?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189978299","content_text":"It’s a little early in the year to be discussing peaks, but the top may have come and gone for a popular emerging-markets index, according to strategists atMorgan Stanley.\nMorgan Stanley strategists, led by Jonathan Garner, say theMSCI emerging market indexalready topped its year-end target of 1,330, though it has fallen back subsequently. Flows to the region hit an all-time high last week. “Euphoric” fund inflows have invariably been associated with market tops, and vice versa, they note.\nAlready a Top?MSCI Emerging Markets Index USDSource: FactSetSept. 2020'21100011001200130014001500\nThey list a number of factors why the index may have peaked. For one, thecopperprice is correcting, and that has a strong correlation with the index. Another is that central bank balance sheet growth of the G4 — the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japanand the European Central Bank — is likely to peak next month at over 50% growth, and then start to slow significantly. A measure of liquidity in China also is dropping off.\nThe break-even inflation rate also peaked, in late January, and is now correcting, they add, which suggests a top in near term sentiment on reflation and reopening. Thedollar,which tends to move in the opposite direction to emerging markets, has stopped declining.\nThere are reasons closer to home for why the index may have peaked. Earnings revisions are showing signs of stalling out. Also, South Korea’s relative performance peaked on Jan. 11, after outperforming by 41% since Mar. 19, 2020. Major peaks in South Korea’s relative performance tend to precede peaks in the broader index, the strategists say.\nTheiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETFtracks the emerging-market index.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1853,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":317995453,"gmtCreate":1612404388172,"gmtModify":1703761372150,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"For the coins. ","listText":"For the coins. ","text":"For the coins.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317995453","repostId":"2108799957","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3242,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314853308,"gmtCreate":1612336069404,"gmtModify":1703760493233,"author":{"id":"3573534203095145","authorId":"3573534203095145","name":"kenntan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/390706ad7d648add89ec3fb5ea5931ef","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573534203095145","idStr":"3573534203095145"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggwp","listText":"Ggwp","text":"Ggwp","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/314853308","repostId":"1172237562","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172237562","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612320389,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172237562?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-03 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Short-sellers were pulling back even before Reddit’s GameStop squeeze<blockquote>甚至在Reddit的游戏驿站挤压之前，卖空者就已经撤退了</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172237562","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Short-sellers in GameStopGME,-60.00%and other targeted stocks have been beaten up recently, but shor","content":"<p>Short-sellers in GameStopGME,-60.00%and other targeted stocks have been beaten up recently, but short-selling may be helping to keep the bull market alive.</p><p><blockquote>GameStopGME、-60.00%和其他目标股票的卖空者最近受到了打击，但卖空可能有助于保持牛市的活力。</blockquote></p><p> Short-selling, according to academic research, has strong predictive power for the U.S. stock market’s subsequent 12-month return. Right now, short interest is unusually low, says Matthew Ringgenberg, a finance professor at the University of Utah.</p><p><blockquote>做空，根据学术研究，对美国股市随后12个月的回报有很强的预测力。犹他大学金融学教授马修·林根伯格表示，目前空头兴趣异常低。</blockquote></p><p> Ringgenberg is a leading expert on the behavior of short sellers. In an interview, he observed: “Even before the recent short squeezes, short interest in December and January was approaching historically low levels. In fact, with the exception of December 2018, this is the lowest short interest has been since before the 2008 crisis.” The data to which he is referring are plotted in the chart below.</p><p><blockquote>林根伯格是卖空者行为方面的领先专家。他在接受采访时观察到：“即使在最近的空头挤压之前，12月和1月的空头兴趣也接近历史低位。事实上，除了2018年12月，这是自2008年危机前以来空头兴趣的最低水平。”他所指的数据绘制在下图中。</blockquote></p><p> Be wary of contrarian investors who interpret low short interest as bearish. Ringgenberg says the contrarians are wrong; his research has found that the short sellers on balance are more right than not.</p><p><blockquote>警惕将空头兴趣低解读为看跌的逆向投资者。林根伯格表示，逆向投资者是错误的；他的研究发现，总的来说，卖空者是正确的。</blockquote></p><p> Note carefully that the chart focuses on the raw short interest ratio. As I have reported in prior columns about Ringgenberg’s research, he has found that the predictive power of the ratio can be improved by calculating where it stands relative to its underlying trend. This adjusted ratio, he adds, is even more bullish than the raw unadjusted ratio.</p><p><blockquote>请仔细注意，该图表重点关注原始空头利率。正如我在之前关于林根伯格研究的专栏中报道的那样，他发现可以通过计算该比率相对于其潜在趋势的位置来提高该比率的预测能力。他补充说，这一调整后的比率甚至比未经调整的原始比率更加乐观。</blockquote></p><p> Note also that the investment horizon for which this adjusted ratio has shown explanatory power is 12 months. So even if the current prediction is spot-on, it tells us nothing about the path the market takes along the way. It could be, for example, that the S&P 500SPX,+1.39%is higher in 12 months while suffering a steep decline along the way. That’s what happened over the past year.</p><p><blockquote>另请注意，该调整后比率显示出解释力的投资期限为12个月。因此，即使当前的预测是准确的，它也没有告诉我们任何关于市场前进道路的信息。例如，标准普尔500SPX指数可能会在12个月内上涨+1.39%，同时在此过程中大幅下跌。这就是过去一年发生的事情。</blockquote></p><p> <b>One big caveat</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一个大警告</b></blockquote></p><p> Ringgenberg says that on rare occasions, short sellers are particularly bearish but nevertheless choose not to aggressively sell short. This occurs most typically when investor sentiment is exuberant, the market is volatile, and when certain stocks are trading without any discernible relationship to their underlying fundamentals. During such times, he said, the already-high risks that short sellers face grow to intolerable levels—and many of them retreat to the sidelines.</p><p><blockquote>林根伯格表示，在极少数情况下，卖空者特别看跌，但仍然选择不大幅卖空。当投资者情绪旺盛、市场波动以及某些股票的交易与其基本面没有任何明显关系时，这种情况最常见。他说，在这种时候，卖空者面临的本已很高的风险会增长到无法忍受的水平，他们中的许多人会退缩到观望状态。</blockquote></p><p> I mentioned this phenomenon, referred to as the “limits to arbitrage,” in acolumn last week about the GameStop saga. Perhaps the most prominent historical example of it came at the end of the internet bubble when a number of dot-com companies with no assets, revenue or business plan were propelled to sky-high valuations. The short interest ratio actually declined from 1998 through 2000 despite ever-rising valuations.</p><p><blockquote>我在上周关于游戏驿站传奇的专栏中提到了这种被称为“套利极限”的现象。也许最突出的历史例子出现在互联网泡沫结束时，当时许多没有资产、收入或商业计划的互联网公司被推到了天价估值。尽管估值不断上升，但从1998年到2000年，空头利率实际上有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> There are some who currently believe we’re in a bubble similar to the late 1990s. If they’re right, then we should not make too much of short sellers’ lack of aggressiveness. Absent that possibility, the message of the short-sale ratio is bullish for the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>目前有些人认为我们正处于类似于20世纪90年代末的泡沫之中。如果他们是对的，那么我们不应该过分强调卖空者缺乏侵略性。如果没有这种可能性，卖空比率的信息在未来12个月是看涨的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Short-sellers were pulling back even before Reddit’s GameStop squeeze<blockquote>甚至在Reddit的游戏驿站挤压之前，卖空者就已经撤退了</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShort-sellers were pulling back even before Reddit’s GameStop squeeze<blockquote>甚至在Reddit的游戏驿站挤压之前，卖空者就已经撤退了</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-03 10:46</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Short-sellers in GameStopGME,-60.00%and other targeted stocks have been beaten up recently, but short-selling may be helping to keep the bull market alive.</p><p><blockquote>GameStopGME、-60.00%和其他目标股票的卖空者最近受到了打击，但卖空可能有助于保持牛市的活力。</blockquote></p><p> Short-selling, according to academic research, has strong predictive power for the U.S. stock market’s subsequent 12-month return. Right now, short interest is unusually low, says Matthew Ringgenberg, a finance professor at the University of Utah.</p><p><blockquote>做空，根据学术研究，对美国股市随后12个月的回报有很强的预测力。犹他大学金融学教授马修·林根伯格表示，目前空头兴趣异常低。</blockquote></p><p> Ringgenberg is a leading expert on the behavior of short sellers. In an interview, he observed: “Even before the recent short squeezes, short interest in December and January was approaching historically low levels. In fact, with the exception of December 2018, this is the lowest short interest has been since before the 2008 crisis.” The data to which he is referring are plotted in the chart below.</p><p><blockquote>林根伯格是卖空者行为方面的领先专家。他在接受采访时观察到：“即使在最近的空头挤压之前，12月和1月的空头兴趣也接近历史低位。事实上，除了2018年12月，这是自2008年危机前以来空头兴趣的最低水平。”他所指的数据绘制在下图中。</blockquote></p><p> Be wary of contrarian investors who interpret low short interest as bearish. Ringgenberg says the contrarians are wrong; his research has found that the short sellers on balance are more right than not.</p><p><blockquote>警惕将空头兴趣低解读为看跌的逆向投资者。林根伯格表示，逆向投资者是错误的；他的研究发现，总的来说，卖空者是正确的。</blockquote></p><p> Note carefully that the chart focuses on the raw short interest ratio. As I have reported in prior columns about Ringgenberg’s research, he has found that the predictive power of the ratio can be improved by calculating where it stands relative to its underlying trend. This adjusted ratio, he adds, is even more bullish than the raw unadjusted ratio.</p><p><blockquote>请仔细注意，该图表重点关注原始空头利率。正如我在之前关于林根伯格研究的专栏中报道的那样，他发现可以通过计算该比率相对于其潜在趋势的位置来提高该比率的预测能力。他补充说，这一调整后的比率甚至比未经调整的原始比率更加乐观。</blockquote></p><p> Note also that the investment horizon for which this adjusted ratio has shown explanatory power is 12 months. So even if the current prediction is spot-on, it tells us nothing about the path the market takes along the way. It could be, for example, that the S&P 500SPX,+1.39%is higher in 12 months while suffering a steep decline along the way. That’s what happened over the past year.</p><p><blockquote>另请注意，该调整后比率显示出解释力的投资期限为12个月。因此，即使当前的预测是准确的，它也没有告诉我们任何关于市场前进道路的信息。例如，标准普尔500SPX指数可能会在12个月内上涨+1.39%，同时在此过程中大幅下跌。这就是过去一年发生的事情。</blockquote></p><p> <b>One big caveat</b></p><p><blockquote><b>一个大警告</b></blockquote></p><p> Ringgenberg says that on rare occasions, short sellers are particularly bearish but nevertheless choose not to aggressively sell short. This occurs most typically when investor sentiment is exuberant, the market is volatile, and when certain stocks are trading without any discernible relationship to their underlying fundamentals. During such times, he said, the already-high risks that short sellers face grow to intolerable levels—and many of them retreat to the sidelines.</p><p><blockquote>林根伯格表示，在极少数情况下，卖空者特别看跌，但仍然选择不大幅卖空。当投资者情绪旺盛、市场波动以及某些股票的交易与其基本面没有任何明显关系时，这种情况最常见。他说，在这种时候，卖空者面临的本已很高的风险会增长到无法忍受的水平，他们中的许多人会退缩到观望状态。</blockquote></p><p> I mentioned this phenomenon, referred to as the “limits to arbitrage,” in acolumn last week about the GameStop saga. Perhaps the most prominent historical example of it came at the end of the internet bubble when a number of dot-com companies with no assets, revenue or business plan were propelled to sky-high valuations. The short interest ratio actually declined from 1998 through 2000 despite ever-rising valuations.</p><p><blockquote>我在上周关于游戏驿站传奇的专栏中提到了这种被称为“套利极限”的现象。也许最突出的历史例子出现在互联网泡沫结束时，当时许多没有资产、收入或商业计划的互联网公司被推到了天价估值。尽管估值不断上升，但从1998年到2000年，空头利率实际上有所下降。</blockquote></p><p> There are some who currently believe we’re in a bubble similar to the late 1990s. If they’re right, then we should not make too much of short sellers’ lack of aggressiveness. Absent that possibility, the message of the short-sale ratio is bullish for the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>目前有些人认为我们正处于类似于20世纪90年代末的泡沫之中。如果他们是对的，那么我们不应该过分强调卖空者缺乏侵略性。如果没有这种可能性，卖空比率的信息在未来12个月是看涨的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/short-sellers-were-pulling-back-even-before-reddits-gamestop-squeeze-11612233719?mod=home-page\">marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9f274618dde80cee69492990094f7510","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/short-sellers-were-pulling-back-even-before-reddits-gamestop-squeeze-11612233719?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172237562","content_text":"Short-sellers in GameStopGME,-60.00%and other targeted stocks have been beaten up recently, but short-selling may be helping to keep the bull market alive.\nShort-selling, according to academic research, has strong predictive power for the U.S. stock market’s subsequent 12-month return. Right now, short interest is unusually low, says Matthew Ringgenberg, a finance professor at the University of Utah.\nRinggenberg is a leading expert on the behavior of short sellers. In an interview, he observed: “Even before the recent short squeezes, short interest in December and January was approaching historically low levels. In fact, with the exception of December 2018, this is the lowest short interest has been since before the 2008 crisis.” The data to which he is referring are plotted in the chart below.\nBe wary of contrarian investors who interpret low short interest as bearish. Ringgenberg says the contrarians are wrong; his research has found that the short sellers on balance are more right than not.\nNote carefully that the chart focuses on the raw short interest ratio. As I have reported in prior columns about Ringgenberg’s research, he has found that the predictive power of the ratio can be improved by calculating where it stands relative to its underlying trend. This adjusted ratio, he adds, is even more bullish than the raw unadjusted ratio.\nNote also that the investment horizon for which this adjusted ratio has shown explanatory power is 12 months. So even if the current prediction is spot-on, it tells us nothing about the path the market takes along the way. It could be, for example, that the S&P 500SPX,+1.39%is higher in 12 months while suffering a steep decline along the way. That’s what happened over the past year.\nOne big caveat\nRinggenberg says that on rare occasions, short sellers are particularly bearish but nevertheless choose not to aggressively sell short. This occurs most typically when investor sentiment is exuberant, the market is volatile, and when certain stocks are trading without any discernible relationship to their underlying fundamentals. During such times, he said, the already-high risks that short sellers face grow to intolerable levels—and many of them retreat to the sidelines.\nI mentioned this phenomenon, referred to as the “limits to arbitrage,” in acolumn last week about the GameStop saga. Perhaps the most prominent historical example of it came at the end of the internet bubble when a number of dot-com companies with no assets, revenue or business plan were propelled to sky-high valuations. The short interest ratio actually declined from 1998 through 2000 despite ever-rising valuations.\nThere are some who currently believe we’re in a bubble similar to the late 1990s. If they’re right, then we should not make too much of short sellers’ lack of aggressiveness. Absent that possibility, the message of the short-sale ratio is bullish for the next 12 months.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2892,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}