社区
首页
集团介绍
社区
资讯
行情
学堂
TigerAI
登录
注册
TendousTendy
IP属地：未知
+关注
帖子 · 167
帖子 · 167
关注 · 0
关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0
粉丝 · 0
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-11-25
Citi group decided on which group of ppl to scapegoat for their upcoming collapse
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
1,394
回复
评论
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-11-10
Market cap of GameStop: 15BUS Stock Market Cap: 26 TrillionHMMMMM
The Fed thinks meme stocks threaten the financial structure<blockquote>美联储认为模因股票威胁金融结构</blockquote>
After some detailed research, the Federal Reserve said on Monday thatit is beginning to worrythat th
The Fed thinks meme stocks threaten the financial structure<blockquote>美联储认为模因股票威胁金融结构</blockquote>
看
2,159
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-11-09
Delusional
Opinion: Why a Fed rate hike could be just the medicine stocks need to keep this bull market going<blockquote>观点：为什么美联储加息可能正是医药股维持牛市所需的</blockquote>
How should stock market investors react when the U.S. Federal Reserve begins to raise the Federal Fu
Opinion: Why a Fed rate hike could be just the medicine stocks need to keep this bull market going<blockquote>观点：为什么美联储加息可能正是医药股维持牛市所需的</blockquote>
看
2,039
回复
评论
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-10-13
$GameStop(GME)$
we like the stock
看
2,463
回复
2
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-10-13
is happening* short squeeze is still on.Unless you have a reason why the stock is still not back to $5? [捂嘴]
What Is A Short Squeeze And What Is Going On In GameStop, AMC<blockquote>什么是轧空以及AMC游戏驿站正在发生什么</blockquote>
What is it that can put a stock on a meteoric rise? This year, we have seen a number of stocks make
What Is A Short Squeeze And What Is Going On In GameStop, AMC<blockquote>什么是轧空以及AMC游戏驿站正在发生什么</blockquote>
看
2,962
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-10-11
When it's not dfv [流泪] [心碎]
Nobel Prize in economics awarded to David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens<blockquote>诺贝尔经济学奖授予戴维·卡德、乔舒亚·D·安格里斯特和吉多·W·因本斯</blockquote>
Economists David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens have been awarded the Nobel Prize in ec
Nobel Prize in economics awarded to David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens<blockquote>诺贝尔经济学奖授予戴维·卡德、乔舒亚·D·安格里斯特和吉多·W·因本斯</blockquote>
看
3,528
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-10-11
$GameStop(GME)$
moon
看
2,404
回复
1
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-10-11
$GameStop(GME)$
direct register on tiger when
看
2,966
回复
评论
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-10-05
$GameStop(GME)$
low volume can't hear the shorts screaming
看
2,792
回复
评论
点赞
5
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
TendousTendy
TendousTendy
·
2021-10-01
$GameStop(GME)$
Octobrrrr
看
1,995
回复
评论
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
加载更多
热议股票
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574898254285562","uuid":"3574898254285562","gmtCreate":1611806141574,"gmtModify":1614754784899,"name":"TendousTendy","pinyin":"tendoustendy","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":11,"headSize":45,"tweetSize":167,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.74%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":874423695,"gmtCreate":1637813818174,"gmtModify":1637816807704,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Citi group decided on which group of ppl to scapegoat for their upcoming collapse","listText":"Citi group decided on which group of ppl to scapegoat for their upcoming collapse","text":"Citi group decided on which group of ppl to scapegoat for their upcoming collapse","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/874423695","repostId":"2186364091","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":847296008,"gmtCreate":1636520282702,"gmtModify":1636520282940,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market cap of GameStop: 15BUS Stock Market Cap: 26 TrillionHMMMMM","listText":"Market cap of GameStop: 15BUS Stock Market Cap: 26 TrillionHMMMMM","text":"Market cap of GameStop: 15BUS Stock Market Cap: 26 TrillionHMMMMM","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/847296008","repostId":"1156695981","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1156695981","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636514367,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1156695981?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-10 11:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Fed thinks meme stocks threaten the financial structure<blockquote>美联储认为模因股票威胁金融结构</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156695981","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"After some detailed research, the Federal Reserve said on Monday thatit is beginning to worrythat th","content":"<p>After some detailed research, the Federal Reserve said on Monday thatit is beginning to worrythat the recent and unprecedented volatility in meme stocks like GameStop and AMC Entertainment are creating pockets of risk inside markets that could create real problems for the entire U.S. financial system.</p><p><blockquote>经过一些详细研究后，美联储周一表示，它开始担心游戏驿站和AMC院线等模因股票最近前所未有的波动正在市场内制造风险，可能会给整个美国金融体系带来真正的问题。</blockquote></p><p> On Tuesday, many of the self-professed “Apes” who created that volatility reacted to the Fed’s concern about meme stocks in a way best represented by, well, a meme:</p><p><blockquote>周二，许多自称制造波动的“猿类”对美联储对模因股票的担忧做出了反应，模因最能代表这一点：</blockquote></p><p> Based on actual textfrom the Fed’s most recent financial stability report, zero-commission trading apps and investors using social media to coordinate their trades have created a weaponized “echo chamber in which retail investors find themselves communicating most frequently with others with similar interests and views.”</p><p><blockquote>根据美联储最新金融稳定报告的实际文本，零佣金交易应用程序和使用社交媒体协调交易的投资者创造了一个武器化的“回音室”，散户投资者发现自己最频繁地与具有相似兴趣和观点的其他人进行交流。”</blockquote></p><p> In turn, the report found, those like-minded investors create huge waves of volatility and risk that could create real issues for the markets and the financial system in a downturn, especially with so many of these mostly younger retail investors exposing themselves to massive losses using leverage and options to execute their trades.</p><p><blockquote>报告发现，反过来，那些志同道合的投资者制造了巨大的波动和风险，可能会在经济低迷时期给市场和金融体系带来真正的问题，特别是在许多年轻散户投资者面临巨大损失的情况下。使用杠杆和期权执行交易。</blockquote></p><p> But that risk also can be felt elsewhere. Fed Gov. Lael Brainard wrote in a statement accompanying the report that it has already been seen inthe Archegos Capital Management meltdownsaga and could spread.</p><p><blockquote>但这种风险也可以在其他地方感受到。美联储理事莱尔·布雷纳德(Lael Brainard)在报告附带的一份声明中写道，这种情况已经在Archegos Capital Management的崩溃传奇中出现，并且可能会蔓延。</blockquote></p><p> “It highlights the potential for nonbank financial institutions such as hedge funds and other leveraged investors to generate large losses in the financial system,” Brainard wrote on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>布雷纳德周一写道：“这凸显了对冲基金和其他杠杆投资者等非银行金融机构在金融体系中造成巨额损失的可能性。”</blockquote></p><p> But while that warning — whichwasn’t Brainard’s first timeringing the alarm on the topic — might have been of concern for Wall Street, retail investors were unshaken.</p><p><blockquote>不过，尽管这一警告——这并不是布雷纳德第一次就这个话题发出警报——可能会引起华尔街的担忧，但散户投资者并没有动摇。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, many retail investors on social media spent Tuesday telling the Fed that using stocks to upend the existing structure of the financial system, by making hedge funds bleed, has been one of their goals all along, using the volatility to reveal what they see as widespread corruption.</p><p><blockquote>相反，社交媒体上的许多散户投资者周二告诉美联储，利用股票通过让对冲基金流血来颠覆金融体系的现有结构，一直是他们的目标之一，利用波动性来揭示他们所看到的普遍腐败。</blockquote></p><p> After all, it’s been no secret that Reddit’s Apes would like nothing more than to see hedge funds crippled by their own actions. Many individuals also expect the end result of that destruction to be a fairer system in which the little guy can thrive.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，众所周知，Reddit的猿类最希望看到对冲基金因自己的行为而瘫痪。许多人还期望这种破坏的最终结果是一个更公平的系统，在这个系统中，小人物可以茁壮成长。</blockquote></p><p> “How is it that the ultra rich can basically GAMBLE in the stock market with over-leveraged positions, Dark Pools, insider information, etc. for YEARS and there is nothing to worry about,” read one very popular post on subreddit r/Superstonk.</p><p><blockquote>subreddit r/Superstonk上的一篇非常受欢迎的帖子写道：“为什么超级富豪基本上可以用过度杠杆头寸、暗池、内幕信息等在股市上赌博多年，没有什么可担心的。”</blockquote></p><p> “Yeah, these are pretty big words coming from an entity that printed 33% of money into existence in a year and then claimed that it wouldn’t lead to long term inflation,” opined user doned_mest_up. “They don’t quite yield the power over the economy that Reddit does, I suppose.”</p><p><blockquote>用户doned_mest_up表示：“是的，对于一个在一年内印刷了33%的货币，然后声称这不会导致长期通货膨胀的实体来说，这是相当大的言论。”“我想，它们并没有像Reddit那样对经济产生影响力。”</blockquote></p><p> But regardless of how Redditors or other retail investors feel, it is worth noting that Brainard’s involvement in the report should not be taken lightly. It has been recently reported thatshe has interviewed for the top job at the Fedand her chairmanship could include a much closer look at retail trading than Chairman Jerome Powell’s has so far.</p><p><blockquote>但无论Redditors或其他散户投资者的感受如何，值得注意的是，布雷纳德在报告中的参与不应掉以轻心。最近有报道称，她已经参加了美联储最高职位的面试，她的主席任期可能会比主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔迄今为止更密切地关注零售交易。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Fed thinks meme stocks threaten the financial structure<blockquote>美联储认为模因股票威胁金融结构</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Fed thinks meme stocks threaten the financial structure<blockquote>美联储认为模因股票威胁金融结构</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-10 11:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After some detailed research, the Federal Reserve said on Monday thatit is beginning to worrythat the recent and unprecedented volatility in meme stocks like GameStop and AMC Entertainment are creating pockets of risk inside markets that could create real problems for the entire U.S. financial system.</p><p><blockquote>经过一些详细研究后，美联储周一表示，它开始担心游戏驿站和AMC院线等模因股票最近前所未有的波动正在市场内制造风险，可能会给整个美国金融体系带来真正的问题。</blockquote></p><p> On Tuesday, many of the self-professed “Apes” who created that volatility reacted to the Fed’s concern about meme stocks in a way best represented by, well, a meme:</p><p><blockquote>周二，许多自称制造波动的“猿类”对美联储对模因股票的担忧做出了反应，模因最能代表这一点：</blockquote></p><p> Based on actual textfrom the Fed’s most recent financial stability report, zero-commission trading apps and investors using social media to coordinate their trades have created a weaponized “echo chamber in which retail investors find themselves communicating most frequently with others with similar interests and views.”</p><p><blockquote>根据美联储最新金融稳定报告的实际文本，零佣金交易应用程序和使用社交媒体协调交易的投资者创造了一个武器化的“回音室”，散户投资者发现自己最频繁地与具有相似兴趣和观点的其他人进行交流。”</blockquote></p><p> In turn, the report found, those like-minded investors create huge waves of volatility and risk that could create real issues for the markets and the financial system in a downturn, especially with so many of these mostly younger retail investors exposing themselves to massive losses using leverage and options to execute their trades.</p><p><blockquote>报告发现，反过来，那些志同道合的投资者制造了巨大的波动和风险，可能会在经济低迷时期给市场和金融体系带来真正的问题，特别是在许多年轻散户投资者面临巨大损失的情况下。使用杠杆和期权执行交易。</blockquote></p><p> But that risk also can be felt elsewhere. Fed Gov. Lael Brainard wrote in a statement accompanying the report that it has already been seen inthe Archegos Capital Management meltdownsaga and could spread.</p><p><blockquote>但这种风险也可以在其他地方感受到。美联储理事莱尔·布雷纳德(Lael Brainard)在报告附带的一份声明中写道，这种情况已经在Archegos Capital Management的崩溃传奇中出现，并且可能会蔓延。</blockquote></p><p> “It highlights the potential for nonbank financial institutions such as hedge funds and other leveraged investors to generate large losses in the financial system,” Brainard wrote on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>布雷纳德周一写道：“这凸显了对冲基金和其他杠杆投资者等非银行金融机构在金融体系中造成巨额损失的可能性。”</blockquote></p><p> But while that warning — whichwasn’t Brainard’s first timeringing the alarm on the topic — might have been of concern for Wall Street, retail investors were unshaken.</p><p><blockquote>不过，尽管这一警告——这并不是布雷纳德第一次就这个话题发出警报——可能会引起华尔街的担忧，但散户投资者并没有动摇。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, many retail investors on social media spent Tuesday telling the Fed that using stocks to upend the existing structure of the financial system, by making hedge funds bleed, has been one of their goals all along, using the volatility to reveal what they see as widespread corruption.</p><p><blockquote>相反，社交媒体上的许多散户投资者周二告诉美联储，利用股票通过让对冲基金流血来颠覆金融体系的现有结构，一直是他们的目标之一，利用波动性来揭示他们所看到的普遍腐败。</blockquote></p><p> After all, it’s been no secret that Reddit’s Apes would like nothing more than to see hedge funds crippled by their own actions. Many individuals also expect the end result of that destruction to be a fairer system in which the little guy can thrive.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，众所周知，Reddit的猿类最希望看到对冲基金因自己的行为而瘫痪。许多人还期望这种破坏的最终结果是一个更公平的系统，在这个系统中，小人物可以茁壮成长。</blockquote></p><p> “How is it that the ultra rich can basically GAMBLE in the stock market with over-leveraged positions, Dark Pools, insider information, etc. for YEARS and there is nothing to worry about,” read one very popular post on subreddit r/Superstonk.</p><p><blockquote>subreddit r/Superstonk上的一篇非常受欢迎的帖子写道：“为什么超级富豪基本上可以用过度杠杆头寸、暗池、内幕信息等在股市上赌博多年，没有什么可担心的。”</blockquote></p><p> “Yeah, these are pretty big words coming from an entity that printed 33% of money into existence in a year and then claimed that it wouldn’t lead to long term inflation,” opined user doned_mest_up. “They don’t quite yield the power over the economy that Reddit does, I suppose.”</p><p><blockquote>用户doned_mest_up表示：“是的，对于一个在一年内印刷了33%的货币，然后声称这不会导致长期通货膨胀的实体来说，这是相当大的言论。”“我想，它们并没有像Reddit那样对经济产生影响力。”</blockquote></p><p> But regardless of how Redditors or other retail investors feel, it is worth noting that Brainard’s involvement in the report should not be taken lightly. It has been recently reported thatshe has interviewed for the top job at the Fedand her chairmanship could include a much closer look at retail trading than Chairman Jerome Powell’s has so far.</p><p><blockquote>但无论Redditors或其他散户投资者的感受如何，值得注意的是，布雷纳德在报告中的参与不应掉以轻心。最近有报道称，她已经参加了美联储最高职位的面试，她的主席任期可能会比主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔迄今为止更密切地关注零售交易。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-fed-thinks-meme-stocks-threaten-the-financial-structure-retail-investors-say-thats-kind-of-the-point-11636498740?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-fed-thinks-meme-stocks-threaten-the-financial-structure-retail-investors-say-thats-kind-of-the-point-11636498740?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156695981","content_text":"After some detailed research, the Federal Reserve said on Monday thatit is beginning to worrythat the recent and unprecedented volatility in meme stocks like GameStop and AMC Entertainment are creating pockets of risk inside markets that could create real problems for the entire U.S. financial system.\nOn Tuesday, many of the self-professed “Apes” who created that volatility reacted to the Fed’s concern about meme stocks in a way best represented by, well, a meme:\nBased on actual textfrom the Fed’s most recent financial stability report, zero-commission trading apps and investors using social media to coordinate their trades have created a weaponized “echo chamber in which retail investors find themselves communicating most frequently with others with similar interests and views.”\nIn turn, the report found, those like-minded investors create huge waves of volatility and risk that could create real issues for the markets and the financial system in a downturn, especially with so many of these mostly younger retail investors exposing themselves to massive losses using leverage and options to execute their trades.\nBut that risk also can be felt elsewhere. Fed Gov. Lael Brainard wrote in a statement accompanying the report that it has already been seen inthe Archegos Capital Management meltdownsaga and could spread.\n“It highlights the potential for nonbank financial institutions such as hedge funds and other leveraged investors to generate large losses in the financial system,” Brainard wrote on Monday.\nBut while that warning — whichwasn’t Brainard’s first timeringing the alarm on the topic — might have been of concern for Wall Street, retail investors were unshaken.\nInstead, many retail investors on social media spent Tuesday telling the Fed that using stocks to upend the existing structure of the financial system, by making hedge funds bleed, has been one of their goals all along, using the volatility to reveal what they see as widespread corruption.\nAfter all, it’s been no secret that Reddit’s Apes would like nothing more than to see hedge funds crippled by their own actions. Many individuals also expect the end result of that destruction to be a fairer system in which the little guy can thrive.\n“How is it that the ultra rich can basically GAMBLE in the stock market with over-leveraged positions, Dark Pools, insider information, etc. for YEARS and there is nothing to worry about,” read one very popular post on subreddit r/Superstonk.\n“Yeah, these are pretty big words coming from an entity that printed 33% of money into existence in a year and then claimed that it wouldn’t lead to long term inflation,” opined user doned_mest_up. “They don’t quite yield the power over the economy that Reddit does, I suppose.”\nBut regardless of how Redditors or other retail investors feel, it is worth noting that Brainard’s involvement in the report should not be taken lightly. It has been recently reported thatshe has interviewed for the top job at the Fedand her chairmanship could include a much closer look at retail trading than Chairman Jerome Powell’s has so far.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9,"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2159,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":844269946,"gmtCreate":1636431603110,"gmtModify":1636431818187,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Delusional","listText":"Delusional","text":"Delusional","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/844269946","repostId":"1182010893","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1182010893","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636426760,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1182010893?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-09 10:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Why a Fed rate hike could be just the medicine stocks need to keep this bull market going<blockquote>观点：为什么美联储加息可能正是医药股维持牛市所需的</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1182010893","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"How should stock market investors react when the U.S. Federal Reserve begins to raise the Federal Fu","content":"<p>How should stock market investors react when the U.S. Federal Reserve begins to raise the Federal Funds rate? That question, in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> form or another, is being asked by almost all investors these days. While no <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> knows for sure when the Fed’s rate hike cycle will begin, it could happen soon —perhaps by the end of the year. With the Fed funds rate near zero and the U.S. economy growing, the question is when, not if.</p><p><blockquote>当美联储开始提高联邦基金利率时，股市投资者应该如何反应？那个问题，在<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>如今，几乎所有投资者都在问这样或那样的问题。虽然没有<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>确切地知道美联储加息周期何时开始，它可能很快就会发生——也许是在今年年底。随着联邦基金利率接近于零，美国经济正在增长，问题是何时，而不是是否。</blockquote></p><p> Conventional wisdom dictates that rate increases are bad news. Higher rates mean that stocks face stiffer competition from bonds. It also means that stocks are worth less, according to standard discounted cash flow analysis: Higher rates mean that the present value of stocks’ future earnings and dividends are lower.</p><p><blockquote>传统观点认为加息是坏消息。较高的利率意味着股票面临来自债券的更激烈竞争。根据标准贴现现金流分析，这也意味着股票的价值较低：较高的利率意味着股票未来收益和股息的现值较低。</blockquote></p><p> Yet it’s surprisingly difficult to support this conventional wisdom with historical data. In fact, the S&P 500SPX,+0.09%has performed better in the wake of Fed decisions to raise the Fed funds rate than in the wake of rate cuts, on average.</p><p><blockquote>然而，用历史数据来支持这种传统观点却出奇的困难。事实上，平均而言，标准普尔500SPX,+0.09%在美联储决定提高联邦基金利率后的表现好于降息后。</blockquote></p><p> I reached this conclusion upon analyzing all rate hike increases and decreases announced by the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (FOMC) dating back to 1990. For each rate change decision I calculated the S&P 500’s total return from the date of the increase, either over the subsequent 12 months or until the date of the FOMC’s next rate change decision, whichever came first. The results are summarized in the table below.</p><p><blockquote>我在分析了美联储公开市场委员会（FOMC）自1990年以来宣布的所有加息和降息后得出了这个结论。对于每一个利率变动决定，我计算了标普500从加息之日起、随后12个月内或直到FOMC下一次利率变动决定之日（以先发生者为准）的总回报率。结果总结在下表中。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e2f1f93d49dd2c6accbf0ab1aac2787\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> If other things were equal, these results would suggest that investors actually prefer higher rates. But, as is so often the case, things are not equal. For example, as Eric Swanson told me in an interview, the Fed raises rates when it worries that the economy may be overheating. Swanson is a finance professor at the University of California, Irvine. Since the stock market typically does well when the economy is firing on all cylinders, it’s not particularly surprising that the stock market will do well, on average, during a rate-hike cycle.</p><p><blockquote>如果其他条件相同，这些结果将表明投资者实际上更喜欢更高的利率。但是，正如经常发生的那样，事情并不平等。例如，正如埃里克·斯旺森在一次采访中告诉我的那样，美联储在担心经济可能过热时就会加息。斯旺森是加州大学欧文分校的金融学教授。由于当经济全速运转时，股市通常表现良好，因此平均而言，股市在加息周期中表现良好也就不足为奇了。</blockquote></p><p> For similar reasons, it’s not surprising that the stock market will struggle during a rate-cut cycle. That’s because the FOMC will cut the Fed funds rate when it is worried that the economy is in danger of contracting. For a recent example of that, just think back to the waterfall decline in February and March of 2020 that was precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>出于类似的原因，股市在降息周期中陷入困境也就不足为奇了。这是因为当FOMC担心经济有收缩的危险时，它会下调联邦基金利率。举个最近的例子，回想一下2020年2月和3月由新冠肺炎疫情引发的瀑布下降。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Other tools in the Fed tool chest</b></p><p><blockquote><b>美联储工具箱中的其他工具</b></blockquote></p><p> There are two other big reasons why the stock market doesn’t react to rate hikes in the way conventional wisdom would suggest. The first is that the Federal Reserve in recent years has become increasingly transparent, telegraphing to the markets well in advance about when it may change the Fed funds rate. This means that the stock market will have had plenty of time to react by the time a rate hike actually occurs.</p><p><blockquote>股市没有按照传统观点对加息做出反应还有另外两个重要原因。第一个是美联储近年来变得日益透明，提前向市场电报可能何时改变美联储基金利率。这意味着当加息实际发生时，股市将有足够的时间做出反应。</blockquote></p><p> This certainly has been the case this year, for example. For a number of months now, the Fed has explicitly announced its intention to begin tapering its monetary stimulus. In addition, the Fed circulates a “dot plot” after each rate-setting meeting showing FOMC members’ projections of where the Fed funds rate will be in coming months.</p><p><blockquote>例如，今年的情况确实如此。几个月来，美联储已经明确宣布打算开始缩减货币刺激。此外，美联储在每次利率制定会议后都会分发一张“点阵图”，显示FOMC成员对未来几个月联邦基金利率的预测。</blockquote></p><p> Advisers often say: “Buy the rumor, sell the news.” This appears to apply here, making it difficult to measure the stock market’s reaction to higher rates. What appears to be the poor performance during a rate-cutting cycle might in fact be anticipation of the beginning of a rate-hike cycle.</p><p><blockquote>顾问们常说：“买入谣言，卖出消息。”这似乎适用于这里，因此很难衡量股市对利率上升的反应。降息周期中看似糟糕的表现实际上可能是对加息周期开始的预期。</blockquote></p><p> The other reason the stock market doesn’t always react in predictable ways to rate hike decisions: The Fed in recent years has increasingly relied on large-scale asset purchases in addition to changing the Fed funds rate —otherwise known as quantitative easing (QE).</p><p><blockquote>股市并不总是以可预测的方式对加息决定做出反应的另一个原因是：美联储近年来除了改变联邦基金利率（也称为量化宽松（QE））之外，越来越依赖大规模资产购买。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, according to research from UC Irvine’s Swanson, QE appears to have just as much impact on the stock market as cutting the Fed funds rate used to have in the decades before any of us had ever heard of QE. The study, “Measuring the Effects of Federal Reserve Forward Guidance and Asset Purchases on Financial Markets,” appeared in the March 2021 issue of the<i>Journal of Monetary Economics</i>. In fact, Swanson reports that, in a zero-Fed-funds world, QE may have even more impact on the stock market than rate changes.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，根据加州大学欧文分校斯旺森的研究，量化宽松对股市的影响似乎与在我们任何人听说量化宽松之前的几十年里削减联邦基金利率一样大。这项名为“衡量美联储前瞻性指引和资产购买对金融市场的影响”的研究发表在2021年3月号的<i>货币经济学杂志</i>事实上，Swanson报告称，在联邦基金为零的世界里，量化宽松对股市的影响可能比利率变化更大。</blockquote></p><p> The bottom line? It’s not the case that a Fed funds rate hike is good news. But, at the same time, there is no easy, straightforward or mechanical way in which you can use changes to the Fed funds rate to time the stock market.</p><p><blockquote>底线？联邦基金加息并不是好消息。但与此同时，没有简单、直接或机械的方法可以利用联邦基金利率的变化来把握股市时机。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Why a Fed rate hike could be just the medicine stocks need to keep this bull market going<blockquote>观点：为什么美联储加息可能正是医药股维持牛市所需的</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Why a Fed rate hike could be just the medicine stocks need to keep this bull market going<blockquote>观点：为什么美联储加息可能正是医药股维持牛市所需的</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Market Wacth</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-09 10:59</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>How should stock market investors react when the U.S. Federal Reserve begins to raise the Federal Funds rate? That question, in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> form or another, is being asked by almost all investors these days. While no <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> knows for sure when the Fed’s rate hike cycle will begin, it could happen soon —perhaps by the end of the year. With the Fed funds rate near zero and the U.S. economy growing, the question is when, not if.</p><p><blockquote>当美联储开始提高联邦基金利率时，股市投资者应该如何反应？那个问题，在<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>如今，几乎所有投资者都在问这样或那样的问题。虽然没有<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>确切地知道美联储加息周期何时开始，它可能很快就会发生——也许是在今年年底。随着联邦基金利率接近于零，美国经济正在增长，问题是何时，而不是是否。</blockquote></p><p> Conventional wisdom dictates that rate increases are bad news. Higher rates mean that stocks face stiffer competition from bonds. It also means that stocks are worth less, according to standard discounted cash flow analysis: Higher rates mean that the present value of stocks’ future earnings and dividends are lower.</p><p><blockquote>传统观点认为加息是坏消息。较高的利率意味着股票面临来自债券的更激烈竞争。根据标准贴现现金流分析，这也意味着股票的价值较低：较高的利率意味着股票未来收益和股息的现值较低。</blockquote></p><p> Yet it’s surprisingly difficult to support this conventional wisdom with historical data. In fact, the S&P 500SPX,+0.09%has performed better in the wake of Fed decisions to raise the Fed funds rate than in the wake of rate cuts, on average.</p><p><blockquote>然而，用历史数据来支持这种传统观点却出奇的困难。事实上，平均而言，标准普尔500SPX,+0.09%在美联储决定提高联邦基金利率后的表现好于降息后。</blockquote></p><p> I reached this conclusion upon analyzing all rate hike increases and decreases announced by the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (FOMC) dating back to 1990. For each rate change decision I calculated the S&P 500’s total return from the date of the increase, either over the subsequent 12 months or until the date of the FOMC’s next rate change decision, whichever came first. The results are summarized in the table below.</p><p><blockquote>我在分析了美联储公开市场委员会（FOMC）自1990年以来宣布的所有加息和降息后得出了这个结论。对于每一个利率变动决定，我计算了标普500从加息之日起、随后12个月内或直到FOMC下一次利率变动决定之日（以先发生者为准）的总回报率。结果总结在下表中。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e2f1f93d49dd2c6accbf0ab1aac2787\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> If other things were equal, these results would suggest that investors actually prefer higher rates. But, as is so often the case, things are not equal. For example, as Eric Swanson told me in an interview, the Fed raises rates when it worries that the economy may be overheating. Swanson is a finance professor at the University of California, Irvine. Since the stock market typically does well when the economy is firing on all cylinders, it’s not particularly surprising that the stock market will do well, on average, during a rate-hike cycle.</p><p><blockquote>如果其他条件相同，这些结果将表明投资者实际上更喜欢更高的利率。但是，正如经常发生的那样，事情并不平等。例如，正如埃里克·斯旺森在一次采访中告诉我的那样，美联储在担心经济可能过热时就会加息。斯旺森是加州大学欧文分校的金融学教授。由于当经济全速运转时，股市通常表现良好，因此平均而言，股市在加息周期中表现良好也就不足为奇了。</blockquote></p><p> For similar reasons, it’s not surprising that the stock market will struggle during a rate-cut cycle. That’s because the FOMC will cut the Fed funds rate when it is worried that the economy is in danger of contracting. For a recent example of that, just think back to the waterfall decline in February and March of 2020 that was precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>出于类似的原因，股市在降息周期中陷入困境也就不足为奇了。这是因为当FOMC担心经济有收缩的危险时，它会下调联邦基金利率。举个最近的例子，回想一下2020年2月和3月由新冠肺炎疫情引发的瀑布下降。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Other tools in the Fed tool chest</b></p><p><blockquote><b>美联储工具箱中的其他工具</b></blockquote></p><p> There are two other big reasons why the stock market doesn’t react to rate hikes in the way conventional wisdom would suggest. The first is that the Federal Reserve in recent years has become increasingly transparent, telegraphing to the markets well in advance about when it may change the Fed funds rate. This means that the stock market will have had plenty of time to react by the time a rate hike actually occurs.</p><p><blockquote>股市没有按照传统观点对加息做出反应还有另外两个重要原因。第一个是美联储近年来变得日益透明，提前向市场电报可能何时改变美联储基金利率。这意味着当加息实际发生时，股市将有足够的时间做出反应。</blockquote></p><p> This certainly has been the case this year, for example. For a number of months now, the Fed has explicitly announced its intention to begin tapering its monetary stimulus. In addition, the Fed circulates a “dot plot” after each rate-setting meeting showing FOMC members’ projections of where the Fed funds rate will be in coming months.</p><p><blockquote>例如，今年的情况确实如此。几个月来，美联储已经明确宣布打算开始缩减货币刺激。此外，美联储在每次利率制定会议后都会分发一张“点阵图”，显示FOMC成员对未来几个月联邦基金利率的预测。</blockquote></p><p> Advisers often say: “Buy the rumor, sell the news.” This appears to apply here, making it difficult to measure the stock market’s reaction to higher rates. What appears to be the poor performance during a rate-cutting cycle might in fact be anticipation of the beginning of a rate-hike cycle.</p><p><blockquote>顾问们常说：“买入谣言，卖出消息。”这似乎适用于这里，因此很难衡量股市对利率上升的反应。降息周期中看似糟糕的表现实际上可能是对加息周期开始的预期。</blockquote></p><p> The other reason the stock market doesn’t always react in predictable ways to rate hike decisions: The Fed in recent years has increasingly relied on large-scale asset purchases in addition to changing the Fed funds rate —otherwise known as quantitative easing (QE).</p><p><blockquote>股市并不总是以可预测的方式对加息决定做出反应的另一个原因是：美联储近年来除了改变联邦基金利率（也称为量化宽松（QE））之外，越来越依赖大规模资产购买。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, according to research from UC Irvine’s Swanson, QE appears to have just as much impact on the stock market as cutting the Fed funds rate used to have in the decades before any of us had ever heard of QE. The study, “Measuring the Effects of Federal Reserve Forward Guidance and Asset Purchases on Financial Markets,” appeared in the March 2021 issue of the<i>Journal of Monetary Economics</i>. In fact, Swanson reports that, in a zero-Fed-funds world, QE may have even more impact on the stock market than rate changes.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，根据加州大学欧文分校斯旺森的研究，量化宽松对股市的影响似乎与在我们任何人听说量化宽松之前的几十年里削减联邦基金利率一样大。这项名为“衡量美联储前瞻性指引和资产购买对金融市场的影响”的研究发表在2021年3月号的<i>货币经济学杂志</i>事实上，Swanson报告称，在联邦基金为零的世界里，量化宽松对股市的影响可能比利率变化更大。</blockquote></p><p> The bottom line? It’s not the case that a Fed funds rate hike is good news. But, at the same time, there is no easy, straightforward or mechanical way in which you can use changes to the Fed funds rate to time the stock market.</p><p><blockquote>底线？联邦基金加息并不是好消息。但与此同时，没有简单、直接或机械的方法可以利用联邦基金利率的变化来把握股市时机。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-a-fed-rate-hike-could-be-just-the-medicine-stocks-need-to-keep-this-bull-market-going-11635955739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-a-fed-rate-hike-could-be-just-the-medicine-stocks-need-to-keep-this-bull-market-going-11635955739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1182010893","content_text":"How should stock market investors react when the U.S. Federal Reserve begins to raise the Federal Funds rate? That question, in one form or another, is being asked by almost all investors these days. While no one knows for sure when the Fed’s rate hike cycle will begin, it could happen soon —perhaps by the end of the year. With the Fed funds rate near zero and the U.S. economy growing, the question is when, not if.\nConventional wisdom dictates that rate increases are bad news. Higher rates mean that stocks face stiffer competition from bonds. It also means that stocks are worth less, according to standard discounted cash flow analysis: Higher rates mean that the present value of stocks’ future earnings and dividends are lower.\nYet it’s surprisingly difficult to support this conventional wisdom with historical data. In fact, the S&P 500SPX,+0.09%has performed better in the wake of Fed decisions to raise the Fed funds rate than in the wake of rate cuts, on average.\nI reached this conclusion upon analyzing all rate hike increases and decreases announced by the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (FOMC) dating back to 1990. For each rate change decision I calculated the S&P 500’s total return from the date of the increase, either over the subsequent 12 months or until the date of the FOMC’s next rate change decision, whichever came first. The results are summarized in the table below.\n\nIf other things were equal, these results would suggest that investors actually prefer higher rates. But, as is so often the case, things are not equal. For example, as Eric Swanson told me in an interview, the Fed raises rates when it worries that the economy may be overheating. Swanson is a finance professor at the University of California, Irvine. Since the stock market typically does well when the economy is firing on all cylinders, it’s not particularly surprising that the stock market will do well, on average, during a rate-hike cycle.\nFor similar reasons, it’s not surprising that the stock market will struggle during a rate-cut cycle. That’s because the FOMC will cut the Fed funds rate when it is worried that the economy is in danger of contracting. For a recent example of that, just think back to the waterfall decline in February and March of 2020 that was precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic.\nOther tools in the Fed tool chest\nThere are two other big reasons why the stock market doesn’t react to rate hikes in the way conventional wisdom would suggest. The first is that the Federal Reserve in recent years has become increasingly transparent, telegraphing to the markets well in advance about when it may change the Fed funds rate. This means that the stock market will have had plenty of time to react by the time a rate hike actually occurs.\nThis certainly has been the case this year, for example. For a number of months now, the Fed has explicitly announced its intention to begin tapering its monetary stimulus. In addition, the Fed circulates a “dot plot” after each rate-setting meeting showing FOMC members’ projections of where the Fed funds rate will be in coming months.\nAdvisers often say: “Buy the rumor, sell the news.” This appears to apply here, making it difficult to measure the stock market’s reaction to higher rates. What appears to be the poor performance during a rate-cutting cycle might in fact be anticipation of the beginning of a rate-hike cycle.\nThe other reason the stock market doesn’t always react in predictable ways to rate hike decisions: The Fed in recent years has increasingly relied on large-scale asset purchases in addition to changing the Fed funds rate —otherwise known as quantitative easing (QE).\nIndeed, according to research from UC Irvine’s Swanson, QE appears to have just as much impact on the stock market as cutting the Fed funds rate used to have in the decades before any of us had ever heard of QE. The study, “Measuring the Effects of Federal Reserve Forward Guidance and Asset Purchases on Financial Markets,” appeared in the March 2021 issue of theJournal of Monetary Economics. In fact, Swanson reports that, in a zero-Fed-funds world, QE may have even more impact on the stock market than rate changes.\nThe bottom line? It’s not the case that a Fed funds rate hike is good news. But, at the same time, there is no easy, straightforward or mechanical way in which you can use changes to the Fed funds rate to time the stock market.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2039,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":822623274,"gmtCreate":1634128628042,"gmtModify":1634128628167,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>we like the stock","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>we like the stock","text":"$GameStop(GME)$we like the stock","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ea9f643d8329fa54c1dd77c2fd60529c","width":"1080","height":"3792"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/822623274","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2463,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":822133105,"gmtCreate":1634099259623,"gmtModify":1634099321670,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"is happening* short squeeze is still on.Unless you have a reason why the stock is still not back to $5? [捂嘴] ","listText":"is happening* short squeeze is still on.Unless you have a reason why the stock is still not back to $5? [捂嘴] ","text":"is happening* short squeeze is still on.Unless you have a reason why the stock is still not back to $5? [捂嘴]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/822133105","repostId":"1107758297","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107758297","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634088266,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107758297?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-13 09:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What Is A Short Squeeze And What Is Going On In GameStop, AMC<blockquote>什么是轧空以及AMC游戏驿站正在发生什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107758297","media":"investors","summary":"What is it that can put a stock on a meteoric rise? This year, we have seen a number of stocks make ","content":"<p>What is it that can put a stock on a meteoric rise? This year, we have seen a number of stocks make truly staggering jumps, doubling in price on consecutive days. There are several factors that are contributing to these gargantuan moves, but one is surely the classic short squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>是什么能让一只股票迅速上涨？今年，我们看到许多股票实现了真正惊人的上涨，价格连续几天翻倍。有几个因素导致了这些巨大的波动，但其中之一肯定是经典的轧空。</blockquote></p><p> While there are some new factors at play in the markets today, the short squeeze has been around as long as shorting stock.</p><p><blockquote>尽管当今市场上有一些新因素在起作用，但空头挤压与做空股票一样长期存在。</blockquote></p><p> What Is A Short Squeeze</p><p><blockquote>什么是轧空</blockquote></p><p> Here is how the short squeeze works. If traders think a stock's price is going lower, they canshort the stock. They borrow shares and sell them, with the intent of buying them back at lower prices.</p><p><blockquote>以下是轧空的工作原理。如果交易者认为股票价格正在下跌，他们可以做空该股票。他们借入股票并出售，目的是以更低的价格回购。</blockquote></p><p> This is mostly done by institutional investors, like hedge funds, given the risks and the margin required.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到风险和所需保证金，这主要是由对冲基金等机构投资者完成的。</blockquote></p><p> And there are big risks. Stocks can theoretically go up infinitely. So a trader who is short can face theoretically infinite losses.</p><p><blockquote>而且存在很大的风险。股票理论上可以无限上涨。因此，做空的交易者理论上可能会面临无限的损失。</blockquote></p><p> Some stocks attract very high short interest, which can be viewed as the amount of shares sold short as a percentage of float, or how much stock has been issued that is available for trading.</p><p><blockquote>有些股票吸引了非常高的空头兴趣，这可以被视为卖空的股票数量占流通量的百分比，或者已发行的可供交易的股票数量。</blockquote></p><p> The problem comes if the stock prices starts to rise quickly. Those that are short the stock will likely receive a margin call. They either have to put more money up to secure their position or close their positions.</p><p><blockquote>如果股价开始快速上涨，问题就来了。那些做空该股票的人可能会获得保证金看涨期权。他们要么必须投入更多资金来确保自己的头寸，要么平仓。</blockquote></p><p> If they choose to — or are forced to — close their position, they are buying the stock to close out their position. This can push the price higher and force other short sellers to do the same. This creates a reinforcing loop of buying and pushing the price higher. This is the short squeeze, as those short the market get \"squeezed\" out.</p><p><blockquote>如果他们选择——或被迫——平仓，他们就是在购买股票来平仓。这可能会推高价格并迫使其他卖空者也这样做。这就形成了一个购买和推高价格的强化循环。这就是空头挤压，因为那些做空市场的人会被“挤出”出去。</blockquote></p><p> Short Squeeze Stocks: GME</p><p><blockquote>轧空股票：GME</blockquote></p><p> This is definitely part of what was happening in <b>GameStop</b>(GME) stock. In August of 2020, GME stock was trading for around 4.</p><p><blockquote>这绝对是发生在<b>游戏驿站</b>（GME）股票。2020年8月，GME股票交易价格约为4。</blockquote></p><p> Shares steadily climbed higher to close out 2020 just under 20 on the back of some big name investors taking stakes in the company. This attracted the short sellers, notably some big hedge funds. Then, on Jan. 13, the stock jumped to hit a high of almost 40 on huge volume.</p><p><blockquote>在一些知名投资者入股该公司的背景下，该公司股价稳步攀升，2020年收盘价略低于20点。这吸引了卖空者，尤其是一些大型对冲基金。然后，在1月13日，该股在成交量巨大的情况下跃升至近40点的高点。</blockquote></p><p> That was surely the start of the short squeeze. That 40 level held for about a week. On Jan. 22, the stock jumped again, trading above 70 on the biggest volume day up to that point.</p><p><blockquote>这无疑是空头挤压的开始。40的水平持续了大约一周。1月22日，该股再次上涨，在迄今为止成交量最大的一天交易价格突破70美元。</blockquote></p><p> The next day the stock hit a high of almost 160 with similar action the next day. Then on Jan. 27 the stock doubled again, trading up to 380. The Jan. 28 high was 483.</p><p><blockquote>第二天，该股触及近160点的高点，第二天也出现了类似的走势。随后在1月27日，该股再次翻倍，交易价格高达380点。1月28日的高点是483。</blockquote></p><p> While short squeezes are nothing new, this action is unprecedented. The action is certainly partly stock buying by the Reddit group wallstreetbets.</p><p><blockquote>虽然轧空并不是什么新鲜事，但这一行动却是前所未有的。这一行动肯定部分是Reddit组织wallstreetbets购买股票的结果。</blockquote></p><p> And while many are cheering that the little retail traders are beating up the big institutional shorts, it is pretty clear that other institutions are also in on this buying. Stories have popped up about Michael Burry's gains on GME stock and Elon Musk was tweeting about it.</p><p><blockquote>虽然许多人欢呼小型散户交易者击败大型机构空头，但很明显，其他机构也参与了这一购买。有关迈克尔·伯里(Michael Burry)增持GME股票的故事不断涌现，埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)也在推特上发布了相关消息。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge Fund Losses</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金损失</blockquote></p><p> There are some big losses in this squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>这次挤压有一些很大的损失。</blockquote></p><p> Two funds in particular have been hard hit. Citron Research and Melvin Capital have reportedly suffered huge losses.</p><p><blockquote>两只基金尤其受到重创。据报道，Citron Research和Melvin Capital遭受了巨大损失。</blockquote></p><p> Melvin is down 30% in 2021 on the back of a GME stock short position. It turned to Steven Cohen of Point72 Capital and Chicago-based Citadel to bail it out.</p><p><blockquote>由于GME股票空头头寸，梅尔文在2021年下跌了30%。它向Point72 Capital的史蒂文·科恩(Steven Cohen)和芝加哥Citadel寻求救助。</blockquote></p><p> The short squeeze is usually something inflicted by one hedge fund on another.</p><p><blockquote>轧空通常是一家对冲基金对另一家对冲基金造成的。</blockquote></p><p> This is really the first time we have seen such trading instigated by a band of retail traders.</p><p><blockquote>这确实是我们第一次看到由一群散户煽动的此类交易。</blockquote></p><p> Options Trading Is Also A Big Factor</p><p><blockquote>期权交易也是一大因素</blockquote></p><p> Another piece of this story's plot is the fact that much of the trading in GME and other names like <b>AMC Entertainment</b>(AMC) and <b>BlackBerry</b>(BB) is actually taking place in the options market.</p><p><blockquote>这个故事的另一个情节是，GME和其他名称的大部分交易，例如<b>AMC院线</b>（AMC）和<b>黑莓</b>（BB）实际上正在期权市场中发生。</blockquote></p><p> Bullish call buying instead of buying the stock is attractive here because of the leverage it provides and the fact that the positions are limited risk.</p><p><blockquote>看涨看涨期权买入而不是买入股票在这里很有吸引力，因为它提供了杠杆，而且头寸风险有限。</blockquote></p><p> Calls are contracts that give the right to buy the underlying stock for a given price (strike price) until the expiration date.</p><p><blockquote>评级是赋予在到期日之前以给定价格（执行价格）购买标的股票的权利的合约。</blockquote></p><p> The most that can be lost is the premium paid for the calls.</p><p><blockquote>最多损失的就是为评级支付的保费。</blockquote></p><p> Buying calls requires much less capital, so bigger positions can be taken by small traders.</p><p><blockquote>购买评级所需的资金要少得多，因此小交易者可以持有更大的头寸。</blockquote></p><p> This actually adds to the short squeeze effect.</p><p><blockquote>这实际上增加了空头挤压效应。</blockquote></p><p> When retail traders buy calls, it is market makers that sell them.</p><p><blockquote>当散户交易者买入评级时，卖出它们的是做市商。</blockquote></p><p> The market makers don't want the risk of being short calls, so they do something called delta hedging.</p><p><blockquote>做市商不想冒做空评级的风险，所以他们做了一种叫做delta对冲的事情。</blockquote></p><p> What Is Delta Hedging, And Why It Matters In A Short Squeeze</p><p><blockquote>什么是Delta对冲，以及为什么它在轧空中很重要</blockquote></p><p> Delta hedging calls requires the market makers to buy stock. And because of the nature of calls, when the price of the underlying stock goes up, the market makers have to buy more stock to stay hedged.</p><p><blockquote>Delta对冲评级要求做市商购买股票。由于评级的性质，当标的股票价格上涨时，做市商必须购买更多股票以保持对冲。</blockquote></p><p> We might call this the call option squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>我们可能会看涨期权这是看涨期权期权挤压。</blockquote></p><p> The problem is that these moves are not based on any fundamental changes in the stocks.</p><p><blockquote>问题是，这些举措并不是基于股票的任何根本性变化。</blockquote></p><p> Not much has changed for GME stock since it was a $4 stock, and certainly not since it was a $16 stock.</p><p><blockquote>自从GME股票是4美元的股票以来，它没有太大变化，当然自从它是16美元的股票以来也没有太大变化。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Brokerage firms are very concerned about the volatility of these moves, as they know they may face losses if customers can't cover positions. They started limiting the positions that can be taken in some of these names.</p><p><blockquote>经纪公司非常担心这些走势的波动性，因为他们知道，如果客户无法补仓，他们可能会面临损失。他们开始限制其中一些名字的位置。</blockquote></p><p> That news came on Jan. 28, which saw GameStop stock price range from over 500 to below 115.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息是在1月28日发布的，当时游戏驿站股价从500多点波动到115点以下。</blockquote></p><p> This is a trade you wanted to watch out for. While some hedge funds were hurt and some retail traders made fortunes — at least on paper — this still may end badly.</p><p><blockquote>这是你想要小心的交易。尽管一些对冲基金受到了伤害，一些散户交易者赚了钱——至少在纸面上——但这仍然可能以糟糕的结局告终。</blockquote></p><p> The helium holding these stocks up would not last forever.</p><p><blockquote>支撑这些库存的氦气不会永远持续下去。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610449120050","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What Is A Short Squeeze And What Is Going On In GameStop, AMC<blockquote>什么是轧空以及AMC游戏驿站正在发生什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat Is A Short Squeeze And What Is Going On In GameStop, AMC<blockquote>什么是轧空以及AMC游戏驿站正在发生什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">investors</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-13 09:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What is it that can put a stock on a meteoric rise? This year, we have seen a number of stocks make truly staggering jumps, doubling in price on consecutive days. There are several factors that are contributing to these gargantuan moves, but one is surely the classic short squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>是什么能让一只股票迅速上涨？今年，我们看到许多股票实现了真正惊人的上涨，价格连续几天翻倍。有几个因素导致了这些巨大的波动，但其中之一肯定是经典的轧空。</blockquote></p><p> While there are some new factors at play in the markets today, the short squeeze has been around as long as shorting stock.</p><p><blockquote>尽管当今市场上有一些新因素在起作用，但空头挤压与做空股票一样长期存在。</blockquote></p><p> What Is A Short Squeeze</p><p><blockquote>什么是轧空</blockquote></p><p> Here is how the short squeeze works. If traders think a stock's price is going lower, they canshort the stock. They borrow shares and sell them, with the intent of buying them back at lower prices.</p><p><blockquote>以下是轧空的工作原理。如果交易者认为股票价格正在下跌，他们可以做空该股票。他们借入股票并出售，目的是以更低的价格回购。</blockquote></p><p> This is mostly done by institutional investors, like hedge funds, given the risks and the margin required.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到风险和所需保证金，这主要是由对冲基金等机构投资者完成的。</blockquote></p><p> And there are big risks. Stocks can theoretically go up infinitely. So a trader who is short can face theoretically infinite losses.</p><p><blockquote>而且存在很大的风险。股票理论上可以无限上涨。因此，做空的交易者理论上可能会面临无限的损失。</blockquote></p><p> Some stocks attract very high short interest, which can be viewed as the amount of shares sold short as a percentage of float, or how much stock has been issued that is available for trading.</p><p><blockquote>有些股票吸引了非常高的空头兴趣，这可以被视为卖空的股票数量占流通量的百分比，或者已发行的可供交易的股票数量。</blockquote></p><p> The problem comes if the stock prices starts to rise quickly. Those that are short the stock will likely receive a margin call. They either have to put more money up to secure their position or close their positions.</p><p><blockquote>如果股价开始快速上涨，问题就来了。那些做空该股票的人可能会获得保证金看涨期权。他们要么必须投入更多资金来确保自己的头寸，要么平仓。</blockquote></p><p> If they choose to — or are forced to — close their position, they are buying the stock to close out their position. This can push the price higher and force other short sellers to do the same. This creates a reinforcing loop of buying and pushing the price higher. This is the short squeeze, as those short the market get \"squeezed\" out.</p><p><blockquote>如果他们选择——或被迫——平仓，他们就是在购买股票来平仓。这可能会推高价格并迫使其他卖空者也这样做。这就形成了一个购买和推高价格的强化循环。这就是空头挤压，因为那些做空市场的人会被“挤出”出去。</blockquote></p><p> Short Squeeze Stocks: GME</p><p><blockquote>轧空股票：GME</blockquote></p><p> This is definitely part of what was happening in <b>GameStop</b>(GME) stock. In August of 2020, GME stock was trading for around 4.</p><p><blockquote>这绝对是发生在<b>游戏驿站</b>（GME）股票。2020年8月，GME股票交易价格约为4。</blockquote></p><p> Shares steadily climbed higher to close out 2020 just under 20 on the back of some big name investors taking stakes in the company. This attracted the short sellers, notably some big hedge funds. Then, on Jan. 13, the stock jumped to hit a high of almost 40 on huge volume.</p><p><blockquote>在一些知名投资者入股该公司的背景下，该公司股价稳步攀升，2020年收盘价略低于20点。这吸引了卖空者，尤其是一些大型对冲基金。然后，在1月13日，该股在成交量巨大的情况下跃升至近40点的高点。</blockquote></p><p> That was surely the start of the short squeeze. That 40 level held for about a week. On Jan. 22, the stock jumped again, trading above 70 on the biggest volume day up to that point.</p><p><blockquote>这无疑是空头挤压的开始。40的水平持续了大约一周。1月22日，该股再次上涨，在迄今为止成交量最大的一天交易价格突破70美元。</blockquote></p><p> The next day the stock hit a high of almost 160 with similar action the next day. Then on Jan. 27 the stock doubled again, trading up to 380. The Jan. 28 high was 483.</p><p><blockquote>第二天，该股触及近160点的高点，第二天也出现了类似的走势。随后在1月27日，该股再次翻倍，交易价格高达380点。1月28日的高点是483。</blockquote></p><p> While short squeezes are nothing new, this action is unprecedented. The action is certainly partly stock buying by the Reddit group wallstreetbets.</p><p><blockquote>虽然轧空并不是什么新鲜事，但这一行动却是前所未有的。这一行动肯定部分是Reddit组织wallstreetbets购买股票的结果。</blockquote></p><p> And while many are cheering that the little retail traders are beating up the big institutional shorts, it is pretty clear that other institutions are also in on this buying. Stories have popped up about Michael Burry's gains on GME stock and Elon Musk was tweeting about it.</p><p><blockquote>虽然许多人欢呼小型散户交易者击败大型机构空头，但很明显，其他机构也参与了这一购买。有关迈克尔·伯里(Michael Burry)增持GME股票的故事不断涌现，埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)也在推特上发布了相关消息。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge Fund Losses</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金损失</blockquote></p><p> There are some big losses in this squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>这次挤压有一些很大的损失。</blockquote></p><p> Two funds in particular have been hard hit. Citron Research and Melvin Capital have reportedly suffered huge losses.</p><p><blockquote>两只基金尤其受到重创。据报道，Citron Research和Melvin Capital遭受了巨大损失。</blockquote></p><p> Melvin is down 30% in 2021 on the back of a GME stock short position. It turned to Steven Cohen of Point72 Capital and Chicago-based Citadel to bail it out.</p><p><blockquote>由于GME股票空头头寸，梅尔文在2021年下跌了30%。它向Point72 Capital的史蒂文·科恩(Steven Cohen)和芝加哥Citadel寻求救助。</blockquote></p><p> The short squeeze is usually something inflicted by one hedge fund on another.</p><p><blockquote>轧空通常是一家对冲基金对另一家对冲基金造成的。</blockquote></p><p> This is really the first time we have seen such trading instigated by a band of retail traders.</p><p><blockquote>这确实是我们第一次看到由一群散户煽动的此类交易。</blockquote></p><p> Options Trading Is Also A Big Factor</p><p><blockquote>期权交易也是一大因素</blockquote></p><p> Another piece of this story's plot is the fact that much of the trading in GME and other names like <b>AMC Entertainment</b>(AMC) and <b>BlackBerry</b>(BB) is actually taking place in the options market.</p><p><blockquote>这个故事的另一个情节是，GME和其他名称的大部分交易，例如<b>AMC院线</b>（AMC）和<b>黑莓</b>（BB）实际上正在期权市场中发生。</blockquote></p><p> Bullish call buying instead of buying the stock is attractive here because of the leverage it provides and the fact that the positions are limited risk.</p><p><blockquote>看涨看涨期权买入而不是买入股票在这里很有吸引力，因为它提供了杠杆，而且头寸风险有限。</blockquote></p><p> Calls are contracts that give the right to buy the underlying stock for a given price (strike price) until the expiration date.</p><p><blockquote>评级是赋予在到期日之前以给定价格（执行价格）购买标的股票的权利的合约。</blockquote></p><p> The most that can be lost is the premium paid for the calls.</p><p><blockquote>最多损失的就是为评级支付的保费。</blockquote></p><p> Buying calls requires much less capital, so bigger positions can be taken by small traders.</p><p><blockquote>购买评级所需的资金要少得多，因此小交易者可以持有更大的头寸。</blockquote></p><p> This actually adds to the short squeeze effect.</p><p><blockquote>这实际上增加了空头挤压效应。</blockquote></p><p> When retail traders buy calls, it is market makers that sell them.</p><p><blockquote>当散户交易者买入评级时，卖出它们的是做市商。</blockquote></p><p> The market makers don't want the risk of being short calls, so they do something called delta hedging.</p><p><blockquote>做市商不想冒做空评级的风险，所以他们做了一种叫做delta对冲的事情。</blockquote></p><p> What Is Delta Hedging, And Why It Matters In A Short Squeeze</p><p><blockquote>什么是Delta对冲，以及为什么它在轧空中很重要</blockquote></p><p> Delta hedging calls requires the market makers to buy stock. And because of the nature of calls, when the price of the underlying stock goes up, the market makers have to buy more stock to stay hedged.</p><p><blockquote>Delta对冲评级要求做市商购买股票。由于评级的性质，当标的股票价格上涨时，做市商必须购买更多股票以保持对冲。</blockquote></p><p> We might call this the call option squeeze.</p><p><blockquote>我们可能会看涨期权这是看涨期权期权挤压。</blockquote></p><p> The problem is that these moves are not based on any fundamental changes in the stocks.</p><p><blockquote>问题是，这些举措并不是基于股票的任何根本性变化。</blockquote></p><p> Not much has changed for GME stock since it was a $4 stock, and certainly not since it was a $16 stock.</p><p><blockquote>自从GME股票是4美元的股票以来，它没有太大变化，当然自从它是16美元的股票以来也没有太大变化。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Brokerage firms are very concerned about the volatility of these moves, as they know they may face losses if customers can't cover positions. They started limiting the positions that can be taken in some of these names.</p><p><blockquote>经纪公司非常担心这些走势的波动性，因为他们知道，如果客户无法补仓，他们可能会面临损失。他们开始限制其中一些名字的位置。</blockquote></p><p> That news came on Jan. 28, which saw GameStop stock price range from over 500 to below 115.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息是在1月28日发布的，当时游戏驿站股价从500多点波动到115点以下。</blockquote></p><p> This is a trade you wanted to watch out for. While some hedge funds were hurt and some retail traders made fortunes — at least on paper — this still may end badly.</p><p><blockquote>这是你想要小心的交易。尽管一些对冲基金受到了伤害，一些散户交易者赚了钱——至少在纸面上——但这仍然可能以糟糕的结局告终。</blockquote></p><p> The helium holding these stocks up would not last forever.</p><p><blockquote>支撑这些库存的氦气不会永远持续下去。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.investors.com/how-to-invest/investors-corner/short-squeeze/?src=A00220\">investors</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.investors.com/how-to-invest/investors-corner/short-squeeze/?src=A00220","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107758297","content_text":"What is it that can put a stock on a meteoric rise? This year, we have seen a number of stocks make truly staggering jumps, doubling in price on consecutive days. There are several factors that are contributing to these gargantuan moves, but one is surely the classic short squeeze.\nWhile there are some new factors at play in the markets today, the short squeeze has been around as long as shorting stock.\nWhat Is A Short Squeeze\nHere is how the short squeeze works. If traders think a stock's price is going lower, they canshort the stock. They borrow shares and sell them, with the intent of buying them back at lower prices.\nThis is mostly done by institutional investors, like hedge funds, given the risks and the margin required.\nAnd there are big risks. Stocks can theoretically go up infinitely. So a trader who is short can face theoretically infinite losses.\nSome stocks attract very high short interest, which can be viewed as the amount of shares sold short as a percentage of float, or how much stock has been issued that is available for trading.\nThe problem comes if the stock prices starts to rise quickly. Those that are short the stock will likely receive a margin call. They either have to put more money up to secure their position or close their positions.\nIf they choose to — or are forced to — close their position, they are buying the stock to close out their position. This can push the price higher and force other short sellers to do the same. This creates a reinforcing loop of buying and pushing the price higher. This is the short squeeze, as those short the market get \"squeezed\" out.\nShort Squeeze Stocks: GME\nThis is definitely part of what was happening in GameStop(GME) stock. In August of 2020, GME stock was trading for around 4.\nShares steadily climbed higher to close out 2020 just under 20 on the back of some big name investors taking stakes in the company. This attracted the short sellers, notably some big hedge funds. Then, on Jan. 13, the stock jumped to hit a high of almost 40 on huge volume.\nThat was surely the start of the short squeeze. That 40 level held for about a week. On Jan. 22, the stock jumped again, trading above 70 on the biggest volume day up to that point.\nThe next day the stock hit a high of almost 160 with similar action the next day. Then on Jan. 27 the stock doubled again, trading up to 380. The Jan. 28 high was 483.\nWhile short squeezes are nothing new, this action is unprecedented. The action is certainly partly stock buying by the Reddit group wallstreetbets.\nAnd while many are cheering that the little retail traders are beating up the big institutional shorts, it is pretty clear that other institutions are also in on this buying. Stories have popped up about Michael Burry's gains on GME stock and Elon Musk was tweeting about it.\nHedge Fund Losses\nThere are some big losses in this squeeze.\nTwo funds in particular have been hard hit. Citron Research and Melvin Capital have reportedly suffered huge losses.\nMelvin is down 30% in 2021 on the back of a GME stock short position. It turned to Steven Cohen of Point72 Capital and Chicago-based Citadel to bail it out.\nThe short squeeze is usually something inflicted by one hedge fund on another.\nThis is really the first time we have seen such trading instigated by a band of retail traders.\nOptions Trading Is Also A Big Factor\nAnother piece of this story's plot is the fact that much of the trading in GME and other names like AMC Entertainment(AMC) and BlackBerry(BB) is actually taking place in the options market.\nBullish call buying instead of buying the stock is attractive here because of the leverage it provides and the fact that the positions are limited risk.\nCalls are contracts that give the right to buy the underlying stock for a given price (strike price) until the expiration date.\nThe most that can be lost is the premium paid for the calls.\nBuying calls requires much less capital, so bigger positions can be taken by small traders.\nThis actually adds to the short squeeze effect.\nWhen retail traders buy calls, it is market makers that sell them.\nThe market makers don't want the risk of being short calls, so they do something called delta hedging.\nWhat Is Delta Hedging, And Why It Matters In A Short Squeeze\nDelta hedging calls requires the market makers to buy stock. And because of the nature of calls, when the price of the underlying stock goes up, the market makers have to buy more stock to stay hedged.\nWe might call this the call option squeeze.\nThe problem is that these moves are not based on any fundamental changes in the stocks.\nNot much has changed for GME stock since it was a $4 stock, and certainly not since it was a $16 stock.\nBrokerage firms are very concerned about the volatility of these moves, as they know they may face losses if customers can't cover positions. They started limiting the positions that can be taken in some of these names.\nThat news came on Jan. 28, which saw GameStop stock price range from over 500 to below 115.\nThis is a trade you wanted to watch out for. While some hedge funds were hurt and some retail traders made fortunes — at least on paper — this still may end badly.\nThe helium holding these stocks up would not last forever.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9,"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2962,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":828768046,"gmtCreate":1633947766093,"gmtModify":1633947766179,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When it's not dfv [流泪] [心碎] ","listText":"When it's not dfv [流泪] [心碎] ","text":"When it's not dfv [流泪] [心碎]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828768046","repostId":"1151047848","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151047848","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1633946726,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1151047848?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-11 18:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nobel Prize in economics awarded to David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens<blockquote>诺贝尔经济学奖授予戴维·卡德、乔舒亚·D·安格里斯特和吉多·W·因本斯</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151047848","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Economists David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens have been awarded the Nobel Prize in ec","content":"<p>Economists David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens have been awarded the Nobel Prize in economics.</p><p><blockquote>经济学家戴维·卡德、乔舒亚·D·安格里斯特和吉多·W·因本斯获得了诺贝尔经济学奖。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d9f722d87655d2ece2dcf896b6bd647\" tg-width=\"544\" tg-height=\"546\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Card was recognized for his contributions to labor economics, while Angrist and Imbens won the award for their contributions to the analysis of causal relationships.</p><p><blockquote>卡德因其对劳动经济学的贡献而获得认可，而安格里斯特和因本斯则因其对因果关系分析的贡献而获奖。</blockquote></p><p> Last year, Stanford University economists Paul R. Milgrom and Robert B. Wilson were awarded the prize for their \"improvements to auction theory and invention of new auction formats.\"</p><p><blockquote>去年，斯坦福大学经济学家Paul R.Milgrom和Robert B.Wilson因“对拍卖理论的改进和新拍卖形式的发明”而获奖。</blockquote></p><p> The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel comes with a 10 million Swedish krona ($1.1 million) cash prize and a gold medal.</p><p><blockquote>纪念阿尔弗雷德·诺贝尔的瑞典央行经济科学奖包括1000万瑞典克朗（110万美元）的现金奖励和一枚金牌。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nobel Prize in economics awarded to David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens<blockquote>诺贝尔经济学奖授予戴维·卡德、乔舒亚·D·安格里斯特和吉多·W·因本斯</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNobel Prize in economics awarded to David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens<blockquote>诺贝尔经济学奖授予戴维·卡德、乔舒亚·D·安格里斯特和吉多·W·因本斯</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-10-11 18:05</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Economists David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens have been awarded the Nobel Prize in economics.</p><p><blockquote>经济学家戴维·卡德、乔舒亚·D·安格里斯特和吉多·W·因本斯获得了诺贝尔经济学奖。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d9f722d87655d2ece2dcf896b6bd647\" tg-width=\"544\" tg-height=\"546\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Card was recognized for his contributions to labor economics, while Angrist and Imbens won the award for their contributions to the analysis of causal relationships.</p><p><blockquote>卡德因其对劳动经济学的贡献而获得认可，而安格里斯特和因本斯则因其对因果关系分析的贡献而获奖。</blockquote></p><p> Last year, Stanford University economists Paul R. Milgrom and Robert B. Wilson were awarded the prize for their \"improvements to auction theory and invention of new auction formats.\"</p><p><blockquote>去年，斯坦福大学经济学家Paul R.Milgrom和Robert B.Wilson因“对拍卖理论的改进和新拍卖形式的发明”而获奖。</blockquote></p><p> The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel comes with a 10 million Swedish krona ($1.1 million) cash prize and a gold medal.</p><p><blockquote>纪念阿尔弗雷德·诺贝尔的瑞典央行经济科学奖包括1000万瑞典克朗（110万美元）的现金奖励和一枚金牌。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151047848","content_text":"Economists David Card, Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens have been awarded the Nobel Prize in economics.\n\nCard was recognized for his contributions to labor economics, while Angrist and Imbens won the award for their contributions to the analysis of causal relationships.\nLast year, Stanford University economists Paul R. Milgrom and Robert B. Wilson were awarded the prize for their \"improvements to auction theory and invention of new auction formats.\"\nThe Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel comes with a 10 million Swedish krona ($1.1 million) cash prize and a gold medal.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3528,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":828528747,"gmtCreate":1633926609604,"gmtModify":1633926609728,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>moon","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>moon","text":"$GameStop(GME)$moon","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b9a8aa22e20fd14a0b2a3579bab04808","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828528747","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2404,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":828528222,"gmtCreate":1633926585860,"gmtModify":1633926585990,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>direct register on tiger when","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>direct register on tiger when","text":"$GameStop(GME)$direct register on tiger when","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd0ee29e5d67bd33f129fbd734253f78","width":"1080","height":"3792"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828528222","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2966,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":820794832,"gmtCreate":1633429116912,"gmtModify":1633429117162,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>low volume can't hear the shorts screaming","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>low volume can't hear the shorts screaming","text":"$GameStop(GME)$low volume can't hear the shorts screaming","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04d832ad31904b70834717eb30fc2d11","width":"1080","height":"3792"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/820794832","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2792,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":864174403,"gmtCreate":1633080899454,"gmtModify":1633080899691,"author":{"id":"3574898254285562","authorId":"3574898254285562","name":"TendousTendy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/925947ffc7566aad9cffa7ce79ddf982","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574898254285562","idStr":"3574898254285562"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>Octobrrrr","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>Octobrrrr","text":"$GameStop(GME)$Octobrrrr","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e6eed534e48474711d40a2fb2f1d432a","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/864174403","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1995,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}