个人中心 - 老虎社区

Turtlebizkit

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 112帖子 · 112
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-09-16
  [Shy]
  Apple's iPhone 13 secret weapon is, surprisingly, its price<blockquote>令人惊讶的是，苹果iPhone 13的秘密武器是它的价格</blockquote>
  (CNN Business) - Apple's new iPhone 13 and 13 Pro lineup features all of the predictable upgrades: f
  Apple's iPhone 13 secret weapon is, surprisingly, its price<blockquote>令人惊讶的是，苹果iPhone 13的秘密武器是它的价格</blockquote>
  1,443 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-07-09
  [Wow] [Wow] [Wow]
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,081 评论
  4
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-07-02
  $Apple(AAPL)$🍎 you are back! [Love you] [Love you] [Love you]
  1,844 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-07-02
  Yummy [Yummy]
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,717 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-07-01
  [Shy]
  2,428 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-06-29
  Rock n’Roll~ [Evil]
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,306 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-06-28
  Roller coaster here we go again~ [LOL]
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,663 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-06-28
  Tatz good to hear [Grin]
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,840 1
  1
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-06-28
  [Surprised]
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,104 1
  2
  分享
  举报
- TurtlebizkitTurtlebizkit
  ·2021-06-27
  Makes sense. [LOL]
  Why $40 billion in stimulus won’t go ‘into’ stocks<blockquote>为什么400亿美元的刺激措施不会“进入”股市</blockquote>
  It’s a simple logical error If you’re planning to take extra risk in your retirement accounts becau
  Why $40 billion in stimulus won’t go ‘into’ stocks<blockquote>为什么400亿美元的刺激措施不会“进入”股市</blockquote>
  1,512 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3579141181798233","uuid":"3579141181798233","gmtCreate":1616047159799,"gmtModify":1617070940317,"name":"Turtlebizkit","pinyin":"turtlebizkit","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":69,"tweetSize":112,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.10%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":885161277,"gmtCreate":1631765760699,"gmtModify":1631891039042,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Shy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Shy]&nbsp;","text":"[Shy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/885161277","repostId":"1112619991","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112619991","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631762289,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1112619991?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-16 11:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple's iPhone 13 secret weapon is, surprisingly, its price<blockquote>令人惊讶的是，苹果iPhone 13的秘密武器是它的价格</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112619991","media":"CNN","summary":"(CNN Business) - Apple's new iPhone 13 and 13 Pro lineup features all of the predictable upgrades: f","content":"<p><b>(CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Apple's new iPhone 13 and 13 Pro lineup features all of the predictable upgrades: faster performance, longer lasting battery life, better screen and new colors.</p><p><blockquote><b>（CNN商业）——</b>苹果的新iPhone 13和13 Pro系列具有所有可预见的升级：更快的性能、更持久的电池寿命、更好的屏幕和新的颜色。</blockquote></p><p> But the biggest -- and arguably only -- surprise with the lineup this year isn't something found inside a device: the pricing.</p><p><blockquote>但今年产品阵容中最大的——也可以说是唯一的——惊喜不是设备内部的东西：定价。</blockquote></p><p> Apple (AAPL) kept its iPhone prices mostly in line with last year's models, despite rumors they'd be priced higher than ever because of current issues with the chip supply chain. Massive discounts and trade-in offers from US carriers, in some cases amounting to a free device, are available. And the company continues to offer iPhones at a wide range of price points to appeal to more customers, with or without any groundbreaking new features or design changes this year.</p><p><blockquote>苹果(AAPL)的iPhone价格与去年的型号基本一致，尽管有传言称，由于当前芯片供应链的问题，iPhone的价格将比以往任何时候都高。美国运营商提供大量折扣和以旧换新优惠，在某些情况下相当于免费设备。该公司继续提供各种价位的iPhone，以吸引更多客户，无论今年是否有任何突破性的新功能或设计变化。</blockquote></p><p> \"Apple has become the king of the 'good, better, best' portfolio with a phone at every relevant price point, particularly given it typically keeps older models in its line-up for those that don't want to pay four figures for the latest and greatest new devices,\" said Ben Wood, chief analyst of market research firm CCS Insight. \"Add trade-in into the mix and it makes it possible to get customers signed up for a more expensive phone than they likely planned to purchase.\"</p><p><blockquote>“苹果已成为‘好、更好、最好’产品组合中的王者，在各个相关价位都有手机，特别是考虑到它通常会为那些不想支付四位数费用的人保留旧型号。最新、最棒的新设备，”市场研究公司CCS Insight首席分析师本·伍德(Ben Wood)说道。“将以旧换新加入其中，就有可能让客户注册一部比他们可能计划购买的更贵的手机。”</blockquote></p><p> <h3>Trade-in offers</h3> For people willing to trade in their existing iPhones and commit to a wireless plan for the next few years, the discounts are jaw dropping.</p><p><blockquote><h3>以旧换新优惠</h3>对于那些愿意以旧换新并承诺在未来几年购买无线计划的人来说，折扣令人瞠目结舌。</blockquote></p><p> AT&amp;T (T), for example, is offering up to $1,000 toward a new iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max after a trade-in, while Verizon (VZ) is touting as much as $800 off any new iPhone, essentially paying for the cost of a 128 GB iPhone 13. (WarnerMedia, the parent company of CNN, is owned by AT&amp;T.)</p><p><blockquote>例如，AT&amp;T(T)在以旧换新后为新款iPhone 13 Pro和Pro Max提供高达1,000美元的折扣，而Verizon(VZ)则为任何新款iPhone提供高达800美元的折扣，基本上支付了128 GB iPhone 13的成本。（CNN的母公司WarnerMedia为AT&amp;T所有。）</blockquote></p><p> T-Mobile is offering the possibility of a free iPhone 13 for eligible trade-ins and says that with its Forever Upgrade program, users can get up to $800 off their next iPhone every two years, \"forever.\" If users buy from Apple directly and select T-Mobile as the carrier, they'll get a $700 credit toward a new iPhone. The deals go on and on.</p><p><blockquote>T-Mobile为符合条件的以旧换新提供免费iPhone 13的可能性，并表示通过其Forever升级计划，用户每两年可以“Forever”在购买下一部iPhone时获得高达800美元的折扣。如果用户直接从苹果购买并选择T-Mobile作为运营商，他们将获得700美元的新iPhone积分。交易还在继续。</blockquote></p><p> Trade-ins remain a central strategy for both mobile carriers and phone makers to drive replacement sales. The catch, however, is that users will need to trade in relatively new devices.</p><p><blockquote>以旧换新仍然是移动运营商和手机制造商推动换机销售的核心策略。然而，问题在于用户需要换购相对较新的设备。</blockquote></p><p> Trade-in offers also typically tie customers to a long contract that can include high-priced data plans. Carriers want to keep these users loyal rather than seeing them move to a competitor network -- and a discounted or free iPhone could be the right incentive to keep them there, according to David McQueen, a director at market research firm ABI Research. For Apple, it keeps customers deep within its ecosystem of products.</p><p><blockquote>以旧换新优惠通常还会将客户与长期合同联系起来，其中可能包括高价数据计划。市场研究公司ABI Research的主管David McQueen表示，运营商希望保持这些用户的忠诚度，而不是看到他们转移到竞争对手的网络，而打折或免费的iPhone可能是让他们留在那里的正确激励。对于苹果来说，它让客户深入其产品生态系统。</blockquote></p><p> <h3>Prices remain the same</h3> Not only did Apple avoid raising base prices on the iPhone, but it effectively lowered the cost of certain iPhones when factoring in higher entry-level storage options.</p><p><blockquote><h3>价格保持不变</h3>苹果不仅避免了提高iPhone的基本价格，而且在考虑到更高的入门级存储选项时，它有效地降低了某些iPhone的成本。</blockquote></p><p> As analysts at Goldman Sachs pointed out in a research note Wednesday, the price of the 128 GB and 256 GB iPhone \"was reduced when compared to those same storage capacities last year.\"</p><p><blockquote>正如高盛分析师在周三的一份研究报告中指出的那样，128 GB和256 GB iPhone的价格“与去年相同的存储容量相比有所降低”。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ddf548ab0da7c8b8768f25da4cbc011b\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"438\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The many colors of the iPhone 13</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>iPhone 13的多种颜色</span></p></blockquote></p><p> So why not raise prices this year, knowing that Apple always seems to find customers willing to pay top dollar for its devices?</p><p><blockquote>那么，既然苹果似乎总能找到愿意为其设备支付高价的客户，为什么今年不提价呢？</blockquote></p><p> \"I believe Apple is aware that it has hit a sweet spot with pricing and the marginal gain of slightly increasing prices versus the negative backlash it would face is not worth it,\" Wood said.</p><p><blockquote>伍德表示：“我相信苹果意识到，它已经达到了定价的最佳点，价格小幅上涨的边际收益与将面临的负面反弹相比是不值得的。”</blockquote></p><p> More than that, he said Apple is focused on boosting revenue from the many premium services built around the iPhone, such as iCloud storage, Apple Music and Fitness+.</p><p><blockquote>不仅如此，他表示，苹果专注于增加围绕iPhone构建的许多优质服务的收入，例如iCloud存储、苹果音乐和Fitness+。</blockquote></p><p> <h3>'Good, better, best'</h3> When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in 2007, there was one device and one entry price point for users. When Tim Cook took over as CEO, the options became more plentiful: big ones, smaller ones, mini ones, and prices that range from $399 for the iPhone SE all the way up to $1,599 for the 1 terabyte version of the iPhone 13 Pro Max.</p><p><blockquote><h3>“好，更好，最好”</h3>当史蒂夫·乔布斯在2007年推出iPhone时，用户只有一种设备和一个入门价位。当蒂姆·库克接任首席执行官时，选择变得更加丰富：大的、小的、迷你的，价格从iPhone SE的399美元一直到iPhone 13 Pro Max的1599美元不等。</blockquote></p><p> The strategic effort to appeal to as many people as possible will become one of Cook's biggest legacies. It's also one that's translated to blockbuster sales. In April, Apple reported iPhone sales were at nearly $48 billion in the first quarter of 2021, a 65% increase over the same quarter last year, as consumers upgraded to iPhone 12 devices that offered 5G for the first time.</p><p><blockquote>吸引尽可能多的人的战略努力将成为库克最大的遗产之一。这也是一个转化为轰动一时的销售。今年4月，苹果报告称，随着消费者升级到首次提供5G的iPhone 12设备，2021年第一季度iPhone销售额接近480亿美元，比去年同期增长65%。</blockquote></p><p> Some things haven't changed from the Jobs days, however. There may be a much wider range of options and prices for iPhones, but Apple still doesn't come close to the lower-price tiers available on Android smartphones.</p><p><blockquote>然而，有些事情与乔布斯时代相比并没有改变。iPhone的选择和价格可能会更广泛，但苹果仍然无法接近Android智能手机上的低价等级。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> \"The company still focuses on profits and revenue rather than chasing volume and market share, which was the same mantra under Steve Jobs,\" McQueen said. \"Perhaps Jobs wouldn't have launched as many device types at different sizes, as he always feared cannibalizing revenue streams -- notably across iPad mini and larger screened iPhones.\"</p><p><blockquote>麦昆表示：“公司仍然专注于利润和收入，而不是追逐销量和市场份额，这也是史蒂夫·乔布斯领导下的口号。”“也许乔布斯不会推出那么多不同尺寸的设备类型，因为他一直担心会蚕食收入来源——尤其是iPad mini和大屏幕iPhone。”</blockquote></p><p> Still, the number of iPhone variations and price points has only helped it appeal to more buyers -- and it most likely will again this year, too.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，iPhone的变化和价位的数量只会帮助它吸引更多的买家——今年很可能也会再次如此。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple's iPhone 13 secret weapon is, surprisingly, its price<blockquote>令人惊讶的是，苹果iPhone 13的秘密武器是它的价格</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple's iPhone 13 secret weapon is, surprisingly, its price<blockquote>令人惊讶的是，苹果iPhone 13的秘密武器是它的价格</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-09-16 11:18</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>(CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Apple's new iPhone 13 and 13 Pro lineup features all of the predictable upgrades: faster performance, longer lasting battery life, better screen and new colors.</p><p><blockquote><b>（CNN商业）——</b>苹果的新iPhone 13和13 Pro系列具有所有可预见的升级：更快的性能、更持久的电池寿命、更好的屏幕和新的颜色。</blockquote></p><p> But the biggest -- and arguably only -- surprise with the lineup this year isn't something found inside a device: the pricing.</p><p><blockquote>但今年产品阵容中最大的——也可以说是唯一的——惊喜不是设备内部的东西：定价。</blockquote></p><p> Apple (AAPL) kept its iPhone prices mostly in line with last year's models, despite rumors they'd be priced higher than ever because of current issues with the chip supply chain. Massive discounts and trade-in offers from US carriers, in some cases amounting to a free device, are available. And the company continues to offer iPhones at a wide range of price points to appeal to more customers, with or without any groundbreaking new features or design changes this year.</p><p><blockquote>苹果(AAPL)的iPhone价格与去年的型号基本一致，尽管有传言称，由于当前芯片供应链的问题，iPhone的价格将比以往任何时候都高。美国运营商提供大量折扣和以旧换新优惠，在某些情况下相当于免费设备。该公司继续提供各种价位的iPhone，以吸引更多客户，无论今年是否有任何突破性的新功能或设计变化。</blockquote></p><p> \"Apple has become the king of the 'good, better, best' portfolio with a phone at every relevant price point, particularly given it typically keeps older models in its line-up for those that don't want to pay four figures for the latest and greatest new devices,\" said Ben Wood, chief analyst of market research firm CCS Insight. \"Add trade-in into the mix and it makes it possible to get customers signed up for a more expensive phone than they likely planned to purchase.\"</p><p><blockquote>“苹果已成为‘好、更好、最好’产品组合中的王者，在各个相关价位都有手机，特别是考虑到它通常会为那些不想支付四位数费用的人保留旧型号。最新、最棒的新设备，”市场研究公司CCS Insight首席分析师本·伍德(Ben Wood)说道。“将以旧换新加入其中，就有可能让客户注册一部比他们可能计划购买的更贵的手机。”</blockquote></p><p> <h3>Trade-in offers</h3> For people willing to trade in their existing iPhones and commit to a wireless plan for the next few years, the discounts are jaw dropping.</p><p><blockquote><h3>以旧换新优惠</h3>对于那些愿意以旧换新并承诺在未来几年购买无线计划的人来说，折扣令人瞠目结舌。</blockquote></p><p> AT&amp;T (T), for example, is offering up to $1,000 toward a new iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max after a trade-in, while Verizon (VZ) is touting as much as $800 off any new iPhone, essentially paying for the cost of a 128 GB iPhone 13. (WarnerMedia, the parent company of CNN, is owned by AT&amp;T.)</p><p><blockquote>例如，AT&amp;T(T)在以旧换新后为新款iPhone 13 Pro和Pro Max提供高达1,000美元的折扣，而Verizon(VZ)则为任何新款iPhone提供高达800美元的折扣，基本上支付了128 GB iPhone 13的成本。（CNN的母公司WarnerMedia为AT&amp;T所有。）</blockquote></p><p> T-Mobile is offering the possibility of a free iPhone 13 for eligible trade-ins and says that with its Forever Upgrade program, users can get up to $800 off their next iPhone every two years, \"forever.\" If users buy from Apple directly and select T-Mobile as the carrier, they'll get a $700 credit toward a new iPhone. The deals go on and on.</p><p><blockquote>T-Mobile为符合条件的以旧换新提供免费iPhone 13的可能性，并表示通过其Forever升级计划，用户每两年可以“Forever”在购买下一部iPhone时获得高达800美元的折扣。如果用户直接从苹果购买并选择T-Mobile作为运营商，他们将获得700美元的新iPhone积分。交易还在继续。</blockquote></p><p> Trade-ins remain a central strategy for both mobile carriers and phone makers to drive replacement sales. The catch, however, is that users will need to trade in relatively new devices.</p><p><blockquote>以旧换新仍然是移动运营商和手机制造商推动换机销售的核心策略。然而，问题在于用户需要换购相对较新的设备。</blockquote></p><p> Trade-in offers also typically tie customers to a long contract that can include high-priced data plans. Carriers want to keep these users loyal rather than seeing them move to a competitor network -- and a discounted or free iPhone could be the right incentive to keep them there, according to David McQueen, a director at market research firm ABI Research. For Apple, it keeps customers deep within its ecosystem of products.</p><p><blockquote>以旧换新优惠通常还会将客户与长期合同联系起来，其中可能包括高价数据计划。市场研究公司ABI Research的主管David McQueen表示，运营商希望保持这些用户的忠诚度，而不是看到他们转移到竞争对手的网络，而打折或免费的iPhone可能是让他们留在那里的正确激励。对于苹果来说，它让客户深入其产品生态系统。</blockquote></p><p> <h3>Prices remain the same</h3> Not only did Apple avoid raising base prices on the iPhone, but it effectively lowered the cost of certain iPhones when factoring in higher entry-level storage options.</p><p><blockquote><h3>价格保持不变</h3>苹果不仅避免了提高iPhone的基本价格，而且在考虑到更高的入门级存储选项时，它有效地降低了某些iPhone的成本。</blockquote></p><p> As analysts at Goldman Sachs pointed out in a research note Wednesday, the price of the 128 GB and 256 GB iPhone \"was reduced when compared to those same storage capacities last year.\"</p><p><blockquote>正如高盛分析师在周三的一份研究报告中指出的那样，128 GB和256 GB iPhone的价格“与去年相同的存储容量相比有所降低”。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ddf548ab0da7c8b8768f25da4cbc011b\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"438\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The many colors of the iPhone 13</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>iPhone 13的多种颜色</span></p></blockquote></p><p> So why not raise prices this year, knowing that Apple always seems to find customers willing to pay top dollar for its devices?</p><p><blockquote>那么，既然苹果似乎总能找到愿意为其设备支付高价的客户，为什么今年不提价呢？</blockquote></p><p> \"I believe Apple is aware that it has hit a sweet spot with pricing and the marginal gain of slightly increasing prices versus the negative backlash it would face is not worth it,\" Wood said.</p><p><blockquote>伍德表示：“我相信苹果意识到，它已经达到了定价的最佳点，价格小幅上涨的边际收益与将面临的负面反弹相比是不值得的。”</blockquote></p><p> More than that, he said Apple is focused on boosting revenue from the many premium services built around the iPhone, such as iCloud storage, Apple Music and Fitness+.</p><p><blockquote>不仅如此，他表示，苹果专注于增加围绕iPhone构建的许多优质服务的收入，例如iCloud存储、苹果音乐和Fitness+。</blockquote></p><p> <h3>'Good, better, best'</h3> When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in 2007, there was one device and one entry price point for users. When Tim Cook took over as CEO, the options became more plentiful: big ones, smaller ones, mini ones, and prices that range from $399 for the iPhone SE all the way up to $1,599 for the 1 terabyte version of the iPhone 13 Pro Max.</p><p><blockquote><h3>“好，更好，最好”</h3>当史蒂夫·乔布斯在2007年推出iPhone时，用户只有一种设备和一个入门价位。当蒂姆·库克接任首席执行官时，选择变得更加丰富：大的、小的、迷你的，价格从iPhone SE的399美元一直到iPhone 13 Pro Max的1599美元不等。</blockquote></p><p> The strategic effort to appeal to as many people as possible will become one of Cook's biggest legacies. It's also one that's translated to blockbuster sales. In April, Apple reported iPhone sales were at nearly $48 billion in the first quarter of 2021, a 65% increase over the same quarter last year, as consumers upgraded to iPhone 12 devices that offered 5G for the first time.</p><p><blockquote>吸引尽可能多的人的战略努力将成为库克最大的遗产之一。这也是一个转化为轰动一时的销售。今年4月，苹果报告称，随着消费者升级到首次提供5G的iPhone 12设备，2021年第一季度iPhone销售额接近480亿美元，比去年同期增长65%。</blockquote></p><p> Some things haven't changed from the Jobs days, however. There may be a much wider range of options and prices for iPhones, but Apple still doesn't come close to the lower-price tiers available on Android smartphones.</p><p><blockquote>然而，有些事情与乔布斯时代相比并没有改变。iPhone的选择和价格可能会更广泛，但苹果仍然无法接近Android智能手机上的低价等级。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> \"The company still focuses on profits and revenue rather than chasing volume and market share, which was the same mantra under Steve Jobs,\" McQueen said. \"Perhaps Jobs wouldn't have launched as many device types at different sizes, as he always feared cannibalizing revenue streams -- notably across iPad mini and larger screened iPhones.\"</p><p><blockquote>麦昆表示：“公司仍然专注于利润和收入，而不是追逐销量和市场份额，这也是史蒂夫·乔布斯领导下的口号。”“也许乔布斯不会推出那么多不同尺寸的设备类型，因为他一直担心会蚕食收入来源——尤其是iPad mini和大屏幕iPhone。”</blockquote></p><p> Still, the number of iPhone variations and price points has only helped it appeal to more buyers -- and it most likely will again this year, too.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，iPhone的变化和价位的数量只会帮助它吸引更多的买家——今年很可能也会再次如此。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/09/15/tech/iphone-13-price-deals/index.html\">CNN</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/09/15/tech/iphone-13-price-deals/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112619991","content_text":"(CNN Business) - Apple's new iPhone 13 and 13 Pro lineup features all of the predictable upgrades: faster performance, longer lasting battery life, better screen and new colors.\nBut the biggest -- and arguably only -- surprise with the lineup this year isn't something found inside a device: the pricing.\nApple (AAPL) kept its iPhone prices mostly in line with last year's models, despite rumors they'd be priced higher than ever because of current issues with the chip supply chain. Massive discounts and trade-in offers from US carriers, in some cases amounting to a free device, are available. And the company continues to offer iPhones at a wide range of price points to appeal to more customers, with or without any groundbreaking new features or design changes this year.\n\"Apple has become the king of the 'good, better, best' portfolio with a phone at every relevant price point, particularly given it typically keeps older models in its line-up for those that don't want to pay four figures for the latest and greatest new devices,\" said Ben Wood, chief analyst of market research firm CCS Insight. \"Add trade-in into the mix and it makes it possible to get customers signed up for a more expensive phone than they likely planned to purchase.\"\nTrade-in offers\nFor people willing to trade in their existing iPhones and commit to a wireless plan for the next few years, the discounts are jaw dropping.\nAT&T (T), for example, is offering up to $1,000 toward a new iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max after a trade-in, while Verizon (VZ) is touting as much as $800 off any new iPhone, essentially paying for the cost of a 128 GB iPhone 13. (WarnerMedia, the parent company of CNN, is owned by AT&T.)\nT-Mobile is offering the possibility of a free iPhone 13 for eligible trade-ins and says that with its Forever Upgrade program, users can get up to $800 off their next iPhone every two years, \"forever.\" If users buy from Apple directly and select T-Mobile as the carrier, they'll get a $700 credit toward a new iPhone. The deals go on and on.\nTrade-ins remain a central strategy for both mobile carriers and phone makers to drive replacement sales. The catch, however, is that users will need to trade in relatively new devices.\nTrade-in offers also typically tie customers to a long contract that can include high-priced data plans. Carriers want to keep these users loyal rather than seeing them move to a competitor network -- and a discounted or free iPhone could be the right incentive to keep them there, according to David McQueen, a director at market research firm ABI Research. For Apple, it keeps customers deep within its ecosystem of products.\nPrices remain the same\nNot only did Apple avoid raising base prices on the iPhone, but it effectively lowered the cost of certain iPhones when factoring in higher entry-level storage options.\nAs analysts at Goldman Sachs pointed out in a research note Wednesday, the price of the 128 GB and 256 GB iPhone \"was reduced when compared to those same storage capacities last year.\"\nThe many colors of the iPhone 13\nSo why not raise prices this year, knowing that Apple always seems to find customers willing to pay top dollar for its devices?\n\"I believe Apple is aware that it has hit a sweet spot with pricing and the marginal gain of slightly increasing prices versus the negative backlash it would face is not worth it,\" Wood said.\nMore than that, he said Apple is focused on boosting revenue from the many premium services built around the iPhone, such as iCloud storage, Apple Music and Fitness+.\n'Good, better, best'\nWhen Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in 2007, there was one device and one entry price point for users. When Tim Cook took over as CEO, the options became more plentiful: big ones, smaller ones, mini ones, and prices that range from $399 for the iPhone SE all the way up to $1,599 for the 1 terabyte version of the iPhone 13 Pro Max.\nThe strategic effort to appeal to as many people as possible will become one of Cook's biggest legacies. It's also one that's translated to blockbuster sales. In April, Apple reported iPhone sales were at nearly $48 billion in the first quarter of 2021, a 65% increase over the same quarter last year, as consumers upgraded to iPhone 12 devices that offered 5G for the first time.\nSome things haven't changed from the Jobs days, however. There may be a much wider range of options and prices for iPhones, but Apple still doesn't come close to the lower-price tiers available on Android smartphones.\n\"The company still focuses on profits and revenue rather than chasing volume and market share, which was the same mantra under Steve Jobs,\" McQueen said. \"Perhaps Jobs wouldn't have launched as many device types at different sizes, as he always feared cannibalizing revenue streams -- notably across iPad mini and larger screened iPhones.\"\nStill, the number of iPhone variations and price points has only helped it appeal to more buyers -- and it most likely will again this year, too.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1443,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143276398,"gmtCreate":1625798431914,"gmtModify":1631891039046,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Wow]&nbsp;[Wow]&nbsp;[Wow]&nbsp;","listText":"[Wow]&nbsp;[Wow]&nbsp;[Wow]&nbsp;","text":"[Wow] [Wow] [Wow]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/143276398","repostId":"2149121328","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2081,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":156537215,"gmtCreate":1625229632137,"gmtModify":1631891039049,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>🍎 you are back! [Love&nbsp;you]&nbsp;[Love&nbsp;you]&nbsp;[Love&nbsp;you]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>🍎 you are back! [Love&nbsp;you]&nbsp;[Love&nbsp;you]&nbsp;[Love&nbsp;you]&nbsp;","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$🍎 you are back! [Love you] [Love you] [Love you]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/156537215","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1844,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":156085974,"gmtCreate":1625186347198,"gmtModify":1631891039054,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yummy [Yummy]&nbsp;","listText":"Yummy [Yummy]&nbsp;","text":"Yummy [Yummy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/156085974","repostId":"1157474542","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1717,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151216559,"gmtCreate":1625094558971,"gmtModify":1631891039058,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Shy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Shy]&nbsp;","text":"[Shy]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d3ca943dca8377d062d435b28acd2ea","width":"750","height":"1238"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/151216559","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2428,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159214881,"gmtCreate":1624969922343,"gmtModify":1631891039057,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Rock n’Roll~ [Evil]&nbsp;","listText":"Rock n’Roll~ [Evil]&nbsp;","text":"Rock n’Roll~ [Evil]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/159214881","repostId":"1136739891","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2306,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150920358,"gmtCreate":1624883501774,"gmtModify":1631891039063,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Roller coaster here we go again~ [LOL]&nbsp;","listText":"Roller coaster here we go again~ [LOL]&nbsp;","text":"Roller coaster here we go again~ [LOL]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/150920358","repostId":"1150627164","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1663,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127183640,"gmtCreate":1624839708480,"gmtModify":1631891039065,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tatz good to hear [Grin]&nbsp;","listText":"Tatz good to hear [Grin]&nbsp;","text":"Tatz good to hear [Grin]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/127183640","repostId":"2146007118","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1840,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127189899,"gmtCreate":1624839658311,"gmtModify":1631891039067,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Surprised]&nbsp;","listText":"[Surprised]&nbsp;","text":"[Surprised]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/127189899","repostId":"1136989303","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":124130090,"gmtCreate":1624752145110,"gmtModify":1631891039073,"author":{"id":"3579141181798233","authorId":"3579141181798233","name":"Turtlebizkit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae37619873125a6a1b1b6c86916c6c23","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579141181798233","idStr":"3579141181798233"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Makes sense. [LOL]&nbsp;","listText":"Makes sense. [LOL]&nbsp;","text":"Makes sense. [LOL]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/124130090","repostId":"1149837805","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1149837805","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615971667,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1149837805?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-17 17:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why $40 billion in stimulus won’t go ‘into’ stocks<blockquote>为什么400亿美元的刺激措施不会“进入”股市</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149837805","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"It’s a simple logical error\n\nIf you’re planning to take extra risk in your retirement accounts becau","content":"<p>It’s a simple logical error</p><p><blockquote>这是一个简单的逻辑错误</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7a82b8df4254390b71a4ce4488e33d21\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"1092\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> If you’re planning to take extra risk in your retirement accounts because of all the stimulus money about to be “poured into stocks”—don’t.</p><p><blockquote>如果您计划在退休账户中承担额外风险，因为所有刺激资金即将“涌入股票”，请不要这样做。</blockquote></p><p> The same goes for bitcoin.</p><p><blockquote>比特币也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Mizuho Securities is the latest to push this idea, with a survey suggesting that 10% of the $380 billion in stimulus windfalls will be invested in stocks and bitcoin.</p><p><blockquote>瑞穗证券是最新推动这一想法的公司，一项调查显示，3800亿美元刺激意外之财中的10%将投资于股票和比特币。</blockquote></p><p> That,according to Wall Street, means that about $40 billion in extra money will “come into the stock market,” driving it higher.</p><p><blockquote>据华尔街称，这意味着约400亿美元的额外资金将“进入股市”，推动股市走高。</blockquote></p><p> Recently Deutsche Bank&nbsp;estimated&nbsp;young individual investors were ready to pour $170 billion into the market.</p><p><blockquote>最近，德意志银行估计年轻的个人投资者准备向市场注入1700亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And the Wall Street hucksters made the same argument.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的小贩们也提出了同样的论点。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s the old “money on the sidelines” fallacy. (Incidentally this raises, yet again, the question of why we don’t teach logic as Topic No. 1 in the public education system—a failure whose devastating costs are apparent every day.)</p><p><blockquote>但这是古老的“钱在场外”谬论。（顺便提一下，这又一次提出了一个问题，为什么我们不把逻辑学作为公共教育系统的第一主题来教授——这是一个失败，其毁灭性的代价每天都很明显。）</blockquote></p><p> It’s a simple logical error, and it doesn’t matter who points it out—me, your broker, the Man in the Moon. It’s basic logic.</p><p><blockquote>这是一个简单的逻辑错误，谁指出来并不重要——我，你的经纪人，月亮上的人。这是基本逻辑。</blockquote></p><p> Stimulus money, or money “on the sidelines,” cannot “come into the market” for one very simple reason that gets ignored time and time and time again when this comes up.</p><p><blockquote>刺激资金，或“场外”资金，不能“进入市场”，原因很简单，但当这种情况出现时，却一次又一次地被忽视。</blockquote></p><p> Every time a security is bought, one must be sold.</p><p><blockquote>每次买入证券，就必须卖出一只。</blockquote></p><p> Pretty obvious, right? If I buy your Apple&nbsp;stock, then you…er…have to sell it to me. I buy, you sell.</p><p><blockquote>很明显，对吧？如果我买了你的苹果股票，那么你…呃…必须卖给我。我买，你卖。</blockquote></p><p> Imagine if you bought a house and tried to move in, and the previous owner figured he’d hang on to it, as well as banking the check.</p><p><blockquote>想象一下，如果你买了一栋房子并试图搬进去，而前任房主认为他会保留它，并将支票存入银行。</blockquote></p><p> If investors plunge $40 billion of their stimulus windfalls “into” stocks (and bitcoin), guess how much current investors will simultaneously “take out” of stocks (and bitcoin).</p><p><blockquote>如果投资者将400亿美元的刺激意外之财“投入”股票（和比特币），猜猜当前投资者将同时从股票（和比特币）中“取出”多少。</blockquote></p><p> Er…$40 billion.</p><p><blockquote>呃……400亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And if eager young investors rush out and pour $170 billion of their cash into these investments, current investors will…er…take $170 billion out.</p><p><blockquote>如果热切的年轻投资者冲出去，将1700亿美元的现金投入到这些投资中，当前的投资者将……呃……拿出1700亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> It is not a coincidence that the figures match.</p><p><blockquote>这些数字相符并非巧合。</blockquote></p><p> I have $10, you have a share. I buy your share. Now I have your share…and you have my $10.</p><p><blockquote>我有10美元，你有一份。我买你的股份。现在我有了你的那份…你有了我的10美元。</blockquote></p><p> None of this means the stock market is a bad investment (or a good one), merely that this particular argument has no force.</p><p><blockquote>这并不意味着股票市场是一项糟糕的投资（或一项好的投资），只是这一特殊的论点没有说服力。</blockquote></p><p> The more interesting question is whether or not this hot stimulus money will spark even greater animal spirits among investors — especially among those who have the least experience of investing.</p><p><blockquote>更有趣的问题是，这些热刺激资金是否会在投资者中激发更大的动物精神——尤其是在那些投资经验最少的人中。</blockquote></p><p> Is that possible? Obviously.</p><p><blockquote>这可能吗？明显地。</blockquote></p><p> Is it likely? Maybe.</p><p><blockquote>有可能吗？也许。</blockquote></p><p> On the other hand, $40 billion is about 0.07% of the value of the U.S. stocks market and $170 billion is 0.3%, so you have to wonder how much this additional euphoria is going to be worth.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，400亿美元约占美国股市价值的0.07%，1700亿美元约占0.3%，所以你不得不想知道这种额外的兴奋会值多少钱。</blockquote></p><p> You might also reasonably wonder how much extra exuberance the market can handle, given — as the chart above shows — it looks pretty exuberant already.</p><p><blockquote>你可能也有理由想知道市场能承受多少额外的繁荣，因为——如上图所示——它看起来已经相当繁荣了。</blockquote></p><p> For those following trends the more important short-term issue is that the U.S. market—as measured for example by the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF—is (just) above its 50-day moving average and well above its 200 day moving average. So the trend remains bullish.</p><p><blockquote>对于那些跟随趋势的人来说，更重要的短期问题是美国市场（例如以Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF衡量）（刚刚）高于其50天移动平均线，并且远高于其200天移动平均线。所以趋势依然看涨。</blockquote></p><p> Whether that remains the case as inflation forecasts break above 8-year highs, and the White House looks at a 25% hike in corporate tax rates, is going to be another matter.</p><p><blockquote>随着通胀预测突破8年高点，以及白宫考虑将企业税率提高25%，这种情况是否仍然存在，将是另一回事。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile those of a curious disposition might wonder why, if new and inexperienced investors are so eager to plunge $40 billion or even $170 billion “into” the market, current (and possibly more experienced) investors are so willing to take the same amount out.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，那些好奇的人可能会想，如果新的和没有经验的投资者如此渴望向市场投入400亿美元甚至1700亿美元，那么当前的（可能更有经验的）投资者却如此愿意拿出同样的金额。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why $40 billion in stimulus won’t go ‘into’ stocks<blockquote>为什么400亿美元的刺激措施不会“进入”股市</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy $40 billion in stimulus won’t go ‘into’ stocks<blockquote>为什么400亿美元的刺激措施不会“进入”股市</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-17 17:01</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It’s a simple logical error</p><p><blockquote>这是一个简单的逻辑错误</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7a82b8df4254390b71a4ce4488e33d21\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"1092\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> If you’re planning to take extra risk in your retirement accounts because of all the stimulus money about to be “poured into stocks”—don’t.</p><p><blockquote>如果您计划在退休账户中承担额外风险，因为所有刺激资金即将“涌入股票”，请不要这样做。</blockquote></p><p> The same goes for bitcoin.</p><p><blockquote>比特币也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Mizuho Securities is the latest to push this idea, with a survey suggesting that 10% of the $380 billion in stimulus windfalls will be invested in stocks and bitcoin.</p><p><blockquote>瑞穗证券是最新推动这一想法的公司，一项调查显示，3800亿美元刺激意外之财中的10%将投资于股票和比特币。</blockquote></p><p> That,according to Wall Street, means that about $40 billion in extra money will “come into the stock market,” driving it higher.</p><p><blockquote>据华尔街称，这意味着约400亿美元的额外资金将“进入股市”，推动股市走高。</blockquote></p><p> Recently Deutsche Bank&nbsp;estimated&nbsp;young individual investors were ready to pour $170 billion into the market.</p><p><blockquote>最近，德意志银行估计年轻的个人投资者准备向市场注入1700亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And the Wall Street hucksters made the same argument.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的小贩们也提出了同样的论点。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s the old “money on the sidelines” fallacy. (Incidentally this raises, yet again, the question of why we don’t teach logic as Topic No. 1 in the public education system—a failure whose devastating costs are apparent every day.)</p><p><blockquote>但这是古老的“钱在场外”谬论。（顺便提一下，这又一次提出了一个问题，为什么我们不把逻辑学作为公共教育系统的第一主题来教授——这是一个失败，其毁灭性的代价每天都很明显。）</blockquote></p><p> It’s a simple logical error, and it doesn’t matter who points it out—me, your broker, the Man in the Moon. It’s basic logic.</p><p><blockquote>这是一个简单的逻辑错误，谁指出来并不重要——我，你的经纪人，月亮上的人。这是基本逻辑。</blockquote></p><p> Stimulus money, or money “on the sidelines,” cannot “come into the market” for one very simple reason that gets ignored time and time and time again when this comes up.</p><p><blockquote>刺激资金，或“场外”资金，不能“进入市场”，原因很简单，但当这种情况出现时，却一次又一次地被忽视。</blockquote></p><p> Every time a security is bought, one must be sold.</p><p><blockquote>每次买入证券，就必须卖出一只。</blockquote></p><p> Pretty obvious, right? If I buy your Apple&nbsp;stock, then you…er…have to sell it to me. I buy, you sell.</p><p><blockquote>很明显，对吧？如果我买了你的苹果股票，那么你…呃…必须卖给我。我买，你卖。</blockquote></p><p> Imagine if you bought a house and tried to move in, and the previous owner figured he’d hang on to it, as well as banking the check.</p><p><blockquote>想象一下，如果你买了一栋房子并试图搬进去，而前任房主认为他会保留它，并将支票存入银行。</blockquote></p><p> If investors plunge $40 billion of their stimulus windfalls “into” stocks (and bitcoin), guess how much current investors will simultaneously “take out” of stocks (and bitcoin).</p><p><blockquote>如果投资者将400亿美元的刺激意外之财“投入”股票（和比特币），猜猜当前投资者将同时从股票（和比特币）中“取出”多少。</blockquote></p><p> Er…$40 billion.</p><p><blockquote>呃……400亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And if eager young investors rush out and pour $170 billion of their cash into these investments, current investors will…er…take $170 billion out.</p><p><blockquote>如果热切的年轻投资者冲出去，将1700亿美元的现金投入到这些投资中，当前的投资者将……呃……拿出1700亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> It is not a coincidence that the figures match.</p><p><blockquote>这些数字相符并非巧合。</blockquote></p><p> I have $10, you have a share. I buy your share. Now I have your share…and you have my $10.</p><p><blockquote>我有10美元，你有一份。我买你的股份。现在我有了你的那份…你有了我的10美元。</blockquote></p><p> None of this means the stock market is a bad investment (or a good one), merely that this particular argument has no force.</p><p><blockquote>这并不意味着股票市场是一项糟糕的投资（或一项好的投资），只是这一特殊的论点没有说服力。</blockquote></p><p> The more interesting question is whether or not this hot stimulus money will spark even greater animal spirits among investors — especially among those who have the least experience of investing.</p><p><blockquote>更有趣的问题是，这些热刺激资金是否会在投资者中激发更大的动物精神——尤其是在那些投资经验最少的人中。</blockquote></p><p> Is that possible? Obviously.</p><p><blockquote>这可能吗？明显地。</blockquote></p><p> Is it likely? Maybe.</p><p><blockquote>有可能吗？也许。</blockquote></p><p> On the other hand, $40 billion is about 0.07% of the value of the U.S. stocks market and $170 billion is 0.3%, so you have to wonder how much this additional euphoria is going to be worth.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，400亿美元约占美国股市价值的0.07%，1700亿美元约占0.3%，所以你不得不想知道这种额外的兴奋会值多少钱。</blockquote></p><p> You might also reasonably wonder how much extra exuberance the market can handle, given — as the chart above shows — it looks pretty exuberant already.</p><p><blockquote>你可能也有理由想知道市场能承受多少额外的繁荣，因为——如上图所示——它看起来已经相当繁荣了。</blockquote></p><p> For those following trends the more important short-term issue is that the U.S. market—as measured for example by the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF—is (just) above its 50-day moving average and well above its 200 day moving average. So the trend remains bullish.</p><p><blockquote>对于那些跟随趋势的人来说，更重要的短期问题是美国市场（例如以Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF衡量）（刚刚）高于其50天移动平均线，并且远高于其200天移动平均线。所以趋势依然看涨。</blockquote></p><p> Whether that remains the case as inflation forecasts break above 8-year highs, and the White House looks at a 25% hike in corporate tax rates, is going to be another matter.</p><p><blockquote>随着通胀预测突破8年高点，以及白宫考虑将企业税率提高25%，这种情况是否仍然存在，将是另一回事。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile those of a curious disposition might wonder why, if new and inexperienced investors are so eager to plunge $40 billion or even $170 billion “into” the market, current (and possibly more experienced) investors are so willing to take the same amount out.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，那些好奇的人可能会想，如果新的和没有经验的投资者如此渴望向市场投入400亿美元甚至1700亿美元，那么当前的（可能更有经验的）投资者却如此愿意拿出同样的金额。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-40-billion-in-stimulus-wont-go-into-stocks-11615842577?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","VTI":"大盘指数ETF-Vanguard MSCI",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","AAPL":"苹果",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-40-billion-in-stimulus-wont-go-into-stocks-11615842577?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1149837805","content_text":"It’s a simple logical error\n\nIf you’re planning to take extra risk in your retirement accounts because of all the stimulus money about to be “poured into stocks”—don’t.\nThe same goes for bitcoin.\nMizuho Securities is the latest to push this idea, with a survey suggesting that 10% of the $380 billion in stimulus windfalls will be invested in stocks and bitcoin.\nThat,according to Wall Street, means that about $40 billion in extra money will “come into the stock market,” driving it higher.\nRecently Deutsche Bank estimated young individual investors were ready to pour $170 billion into the market.\nAnd the Wall Street hucksters made the same argument.\nBut it’s the old “money on the sidelines” fallacy. (Incidentally this raises, yet again, the question of why we don’t teach logic as Topic No. 1 in the public education system—a failure whose devastating costs are apparent every day.)\nIt’s a simple logical error, and it doesn’t matter who points it out—me, your broker, the Man in the Moon. It’s basic logic.\nStimulus money, or money “on the sidelines,” cannot “come into the market” for one very simple reason that gets ignored time and time and time again when this comes up.\nEvery time a security is bought, one must be sold.\nPretty obvious, right? If I buy your Apple stock, then you…er…have to sell it to me. I buy, you sell.\nImagine if you bought a house and tried to move in, and the previous owner figured he’d hang on to it, as well as banking the check.\nIf investors plunge $40 billion of their stimulus windfalls “into” stocks (and bitcoin), guess how much current investors will simultaneously “take out” of stocks (and bitcoin).\nEr…$40 billion.\nAnd if eager young investors rush out and pour $170 billion of their cash into these investments, current investors will…er…take $170 billion out.\nIt is not a coincidence that the figures match.\nI have $10, you have a share. I buy your share. Now I have your share…and you have my $10.\nNone of this means the stock market is a bad investment (or a good one), merely that this particular argument has no force.\nThe more interesting question is whether or not this hot stimulus money will spark even greater animal spirits among investors — especially among those who have the least experience of investing.\nIs that possible? Obviously.\nIs it likely? Maybe.\nOn the other hand, $40 billion is about 0.07% of the value of the U.S. stocks market and $170 billion is 0.3%, so you have to wonder how much this additional euphoria is going to be worth.\nYou might also reasonably wonder how much extra exuberance the market can handle, given — as the chart above shows — it looks pretty exuberant already.\nFor those following trends the more important short-term issue is that the U.S. market—as measured for example by the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF—is (just) above its 50-day moving average and well above its 200 day moving average. So the trend remains bullish.\nWhether that remains the case as inflation forecasts break above 8-year highs, and the White House looks at a 25% hike in corporate tax rates, is going to be another matter.\nMeanwhile those of a curious disposition might wonder why, if new and inexperienced investors are so eager to plunge $40 billion or even $170 billion “into” the market, current (and possibly more experienced) investors are so willing to take the same amount out.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"VTI":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1512,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}