社区
首页
集团介绍
社区
资讯
行情
学堂
TigerAI
登录
注册
SL69
IP属地：未知
+关注
帖子 · 6
帖子 · 6
关注 · 0
关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0
粉丝 · 0
SL69
SL69
·
2021-08-05
Ok
Nintendo Needs More Than Flashy Buybacks<blockquote>任天堂需要的不仅仅是华丽的回购</blockquote>
A big share buyback will help cushion the blow from disappointing results, but isn’t a strategy for
Nintendo Needs More Than Flashy Buybacks<blockquote>任天堂需要的不仅仅是华丽的回购</blockquote>
看
984
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
SL69
SL69
·
2021-07-31
👍
Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>
Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed. What should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Repor
Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>
看
1,343
回复
评论
点赞
9
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
SL69
SL69
·
2021-07-31
Nice article.
It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金积极分子的开放季节。基金持有人如何输赢</blockquote>
TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasensta
It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金积极分子的开放季节。基金持有人如何输赢</blockquote>
看
1,432
回复
1
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
SL69
SL69
·
2021-07-31
Good alert
非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
看
1,142
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
SL69
SL69
·
2021-06-15
Bullish soon
Royal Caribbean is issuing $650 million of five-year junk bonds<blockquote>皇家加勒比正在发行6.5亿美元的五年期垃圾债券</blockquote>
Royal Caribbean Group RCL, -2.38% said Tuesday it has commenced a private offering of $650 million o
Royal Caribbean is issuing $650 million of five-year junk bonds<blockquote>皇家加勒比正在发行6.5亿美元的五年期垃圾债券</blockquote>
看
1,443
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
SL69
SL69
·
2021-06-15
👍
Toplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>
Stock futures edge up ahead of retail sales data. S&P 500 index is headed toward its 30th record clo
Toplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>
看
1,381
回复
评论
点赞
点赞
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
加载更多
热议股票
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3586838622547139","uuid":"3586838622547139","gmtCreate":1623744632256,"gmtModify":1623765617338,"name":"SL69","pinyin":"sl69","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c3538718e8a43dfdd35a99df0e2559","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":15,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":899149452,"gmtCreate":1628171047876,"gmtModify":1633752971426,"author":{"id":"3586838622547139","authorId":"3586838622547139","name":"SL69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c3538718e8a43dfdd35a99df0e2559","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586838622547139","authorIdStr":"3586838622547139"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899149452","repostId":"1164213999","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164213999","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628168662,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1164213999?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-05 21:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nintendo Needs More Than Flashy Buybacks<blockquote>任天堂需要的不仅仅是华丽的回购</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164213999","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"A big share buyback will help cushion the blow from disappointing results, but isn’t a strategy for ","content":"<p> A big share buyback will help cushion the blow from disappointing results, but isn’t a strategy for the future. A surprise share buyback from Japanese gaming champion <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTDOF\">Nintendo Co., Ltd.</a> should help soothe investors who have held on as the stock dropped more than 10% this year.</p><p><blockquote>大规模股票回购将有助于缓解令人失望的业绩带来的打击，但并不是未来的战略。日本游戏冠军出人意料地回购股票<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTDOF\">任天堂有限公司。</a>应该有助于安抚因该股今年下跌超过10%而持有的投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Nintendo is clearly cash rich, but it needs to articulate a clearer vision for the future as the stay-at-home boost from the pandemic fades.</p><p><blockquote>任天堂显然现金充裕，但随着疫情带来的居家刺激消退，它需要对未来阐述更清晰的愿景。</blockquote></p><p> The Japanese game company on Thursday reported a 17% decline in operating profit for the quarter ending in June, while revenue dropped 10%—both lower than analysts’ estimates on S&P Global Market Intelligence. Nintendo’s profit decline isn’t a surprise given its exceptional performance last year due to stay-at-home demand. The company sold fewer of its Switch consoles and games during the quarter, compared with the same period last year. “Animal Crossing: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">New</a> Horizons,” released in April last year, isone of its fastest-selling games. Component shortages also continue to be an issue in production and distribution of its consoles.</p><p><blockquote>这家日本游戏公司周四公布，截至6月份的季度营业利润下降17%，收入下降10%，均低于标准普尔全球市场情报分析师的预期。鉴于任天堂去年因居家需求而表现出色，其利润下降并不令人意外。与去年同期相比，该公司本季度Switch游戏机和游戏的销量有所减少。《动物森友会：<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">新的</a>去年4月发行的《地平线》是其销量最快的游戏之一。组件短缺也仍然是其游戏机生产和分销中的一个问题。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b38cf9edfa865e3ae218e7f218ee829b\" tg-width=\"327\" tg-height=\"412\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">What surprised investors is Nintendo’s decision to spend up to ¥100 billion, the equivalent of $910 million, to buy back 1.51% of its own stock. Buybacks arerare for the Japanese company—last <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> was around ¥30 billion in 2019. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">Investors</a> have long hoped Nintendo wouldimprove its capital allocation. The company is sitting on around $10 billion of cash as well as nearly $6 billion of securities. Nintendo said its strong cash position, due to better-than-expected business from Switch, is the reason for the buyback. That seems to indicate it could just be a one-off since the boost from Covid-19 likely won’t be repeated.</p><p><blockquote>令投资者惊讶的是，任天堂决定斥资高达1000亿日元（相当于9.1亿美元）回购1.51%的自有股票。这家日本公司的回购即将到来——最后<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>2019年约为300亿日元。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">投资者</a>长期以来一直希望任天堂能够改善其资本配置。该公司坐拥约100亿美元现金以及近60亿美元证券。任天堂表示，由于Switch的业务好于预期，其强劲的现金状况是回购的原因。这似乎表明这可能只是一次性的，因为Covid-19的提振可能不会重复。</blockquote></p><p> The rare buyback will likely boost Nintendo’s share price in the short term, but the company needs to prepare for leaner times ahead too. The stock has dropped 14% this year, underperforming the broader Japanese market as well as peers such asSony.One worry is thetraditionally cyclical natureof the console business. The pandemic has probably prolonged the cycle, but the Switch console is likely past the middle, entering its fifth year. Growing Nintendo’s online business would help improve margins. Better use of its popular intellectual properties could also help diversify income sources.</p><p><blockquote>这次罕见的回购可能会在短期内提振任天堂的股价，但该公司也需要为未来的困难时期做好准备。该股今年已下跌14%，表现逊于日本大盘以及索尼等同行。一个担忧是游戏机业务传统上的周期性。疫情可能延长了周期，但Switch控制台很可能已经过了中间阶段，进入第五个年头。任天堂在线业务的增长将有助于提高利润率。更好地利用其受欢迎的知识产权也有助于实现收入来源的多样化。</blockquote></p><p> Nintendo reaped a windfall from the pandemic. Now it needs to convince investors it has a plan for the world after.</p><p><blockquote>任天堂从疫情获得了一笔意外之财。现在，它需要让投资者相信，它对未来的世界有一个计划。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nintendo Needs More Than Flashy Buybacks<blockquote>任天堂需要的不仅仅是华丽的回购</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNintendo Needs More Than Flashy Buybacks<blockquote>任天堂需要的不仅仅是华丽的回购</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Wall Street Journal</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-05 21:04</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> A big share buyback will help cushion the blow from disappointing results, but isn’t a strategy for the future. A surprise share buyback from Japanese gaming champion <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTDOF\">Nintendo Co., Ltd.</a> should help soothe investors who have held on as the stock dropped more than 10% this year.</p><p><blockquote>大规模股票回购将有助于缓解令人失望的业绩带来的打击，但并不是未来的战略。日本游戏冠军出人意料地回购股票<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTDOF\">任天堂有限公司。</a>应该有助于安抚因该股今年下跌超过10%而持有的投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Nintendo is clearly cash rich, but it needs to articulate a clearer vision for the future as the stay-at-home boost from the pandemic fades.</p><p><blockquote>任天堂显然现金充裕，但随着疫情带来的居家刺激消退，它需要对未来阐述更清晰的愿景。</blockquote></p><p> The Japanese game company on Thursday reported a 17% decline in operating profit for the quarter ending in June, while revenue dropped 10%—both lower than analysts’ estimates on S&P Global Market Intelligence. Nintendo’s profit decline isn’t a surprise given its exceptional performance last year due to stay-at-home demand. The company sold fewer of its Switch consoles and games during the quarter, compared with the same period last year. “Animal Crossing: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">New</a> Horizons,” released in April last year, isone of its fastest-selling games. Component shortages also continue to be an issue in production and distribution of its consoles.</p><p><blockquote>这家日本游戏公司周四公布，截至6月份的季度营业利润下降17%，收入下降10%，均低于标准普尔全球市场情报分析师的预期。鉴于任天堂去年因居家需求而表现出色，其利润下降并不令人意外。与去年同期相比，该公司本季度Switch游戏机和游戏的销量有所减少。《动物森友会：<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">新的</a>去年4月发行的《地平线》是其销量最快的游戏之一。组件短缺也仍然是其游戏机生产和分销中的一个问题。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b38cf9edfa865e3ae218e7f218ee829b\" tg-width=\"327\" tg-height=\"412\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">What surprised investors is Nintendo’s decision to spend up to ¥100 billion, the equivalent of $910 million, to buy back 1.51% of its own stock. Buybacks arerare for the Japanese company—last <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> was around ¥30 billion in 2019. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">Investors</a> have long hoped Nintendo wouldimprove its capital allocation. The company is sitting on around $10 billion of cash as well as nearly $6 billion of securities. Nintendo said its strong cash position, due to better-than-expected business from Switch, is the reason for the buyback. That seems to indicate it could just be a one-off since the boost from Covid-19 likely won’t be repeated.</p><p><blockquote>令投资者惊讶的是，任天堂决定斥资高达1000亿日元（相当于9.1亿美元）回购1.51%的自有股票。这家日本公司的回购即将到来——最后<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>2019年约为300亿日元。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISBC\">投资者</a>长期以来一直希望任天堂能够改善其资本配置。该公司坐拥约100亿美元现金以及近60亿美元证券。任天堂表示，由于Switch的业务好于预期，其强劲的现金状况是回购的原因。这似乎表明这可能只是一次性的，因为Covid-19的提振可能不会重复。</blockquote></p><p> The rare buyback will likely boost Nintendo’s share price in the short term, but the company needs to prepare for leaner times ahead too. The stock has dropped 14% this year, underperforming the broader Japanese market as well as peers such asSony.One worry is thetraditionally cyclical natureof the console business. The pandemic has probably prolonged the cycle, but the Switch console is likely past the middle, entering its fifth year. Growing Nintendo’s online business would help improve margins. Better use of its popular intellectual properties could also help diversify income sources.</p><p><blockquote>这次罕见的回购可能会在短期内提振任天堂的股价，但该公司也需要为未来的困难时期做好准备。该股今年已下跌14%，表现逊于日本大盘以及索尼等同行。一个担忧是游戏机业务传统上的周期性。疫情可能延长了周期，但Switch控制台很可能已经过了中间阶段，进入第五个年头。任天堂在线业务的增长将有助于提高利润率。更好地利用其受欢迎的知识产权也有助于实现收入来源的多样化。</blockquote></p><p> Nintendo reaped a windfall from the pandemic. Now it needs to convince investors it has a plan for the world after.</p><p><blockquote>任天堂从疫情获得了一笔意外之财。现在，它需要让投资者相信，它对未来的世界有一个计划。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/nintendo-needs-more-than-flashy-buybacks-11628159382?mod=markets_lead_pos10\">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NTDOF":"Nintendo Co., Ltd.","NTDOY":"任天堂"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/nintendo-needs-more-than-flashy-buybacks-11628159382?mod=markets_lead_pos10","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164213999","content_text":"A big share buyback will help cushion the blow from disappointing results, but isn’t a strategy for the future.\n\nA surprise share buyback from Japanese gaming champion Nintendo Co., Ltd. should help soothe investors who have held on as the stock dropped more than 10% this year.\nNintendo is clearly cash rich, but it needs to articulate a clearer vision for the future as the stay-at-home boost from the pandemic fades.\nThe Japanese game company on Thursday reported a 17% decline in operating profit for the quarter ending in June, while revenue dropped 10%—both lower than analysts’ estimates on S&P Global Market Intelligence. Nintendo’s profit decline isn’t a surprise given its exceptional performance last year due to stay-at-home demand. The company sold fewer of its Switch consoles and games during the quarter, compared with the same period last year. “Animal Crossing: New Horizons,” released in April last year, isone of its fastest-selling games. Component shortages also continue to be an issue in production and distribution of its consoles.\nWhat surprised investors is Nintendo’s decision to spend up to ¥100 billion, the equivalent of $910 million, to buy back 1.51% of its own stock. Buybacks arerare for the Japanese company—last one was around ¥30 billion in 2019. Investors have long hoped Nintendo wouldimprove its capital allocation. The company is sitting on around $10 billion of cash as well as nearly $6 billion of securities. Nintendo said its strong cash position, due to better-than-expected business from Switch, is the reason for the buyback. That seems to indicate it could just be a one-off since the boost from Covid-19 likely won’t be repeated.\nThe rare buyback will likely boost Nintendo’s share price in the short term, but the company needs to prepare for leaner times ahead too. The stock has dropped 14% this year, underperforming the broader Japanese market as well as peers such asSony.One worry is thetraditionally cyclical natureof the console business. The pandemic has probably prolonged the cycle, but the Switch console is likely past the middle, entering its fifth year. Growing Nintendo’s online business would help improve margins. Better use of its popular intellectual properties could also help diversify income sources.\nNintendo reaped a windfall from the pandemic. Now it needs to convince investors it has a plan for the world after.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NTDOY":0.9,"NTDOF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":984,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806703528,"gmtCreate":1627691981664,"gmtModify":1633757125539,"author":{"id":"3586838622547139","authorId":"3586838622547139","name":"SL69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c3538718e8a43dfdd35a99df0e2559","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586838622547139","authorIdStr":"3586838622547139"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806703528","repostId":"1152039134","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152039134","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627689014,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1152039134?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152039134","media":"The Street","summary":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Repor","content":"<p> Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed. What should Robinhood (<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>听一个知道的人说，这个过程真的有缺陷。罗宾汉应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>)-获取报告为避免IPO失败做了哪些工作？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能说周四发生了什么，谁是负责人，谁为什么辩护。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前TheStreet.com上市时我争论了什么。首先，作为创始人，我决心用股票奖励所有订阅者，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不把很多留在桌面上，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票交给好人，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到流程中，通过批量市场订单、开仓过高然后做空股票来劫持开盘。一路下跌。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给认购者。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>第二，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小的流行，这样每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，场外订单，即那些下市价订单的人，是由一家名为Knight Securities的机构分批的，而不是承销商高盛，开盘价是62美元——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少，太混乱了——交易到66美元，就像Robinhood交易到39美元然后改变，然后再也没有交易更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的都亏了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖出的每个人都赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数是在开盘时买的，我疏远了除了大狗之外的所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程虽然让客户进入，但却未能定价，因此Robinhood将钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们也知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我一直对发生的事感到后悔。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它的可怕程度震惊了，没有“从长计议”，因为从长计议很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易进行得有多糟糕，尽管它完全在承销商和委托人的范围内，所以罗宾汉留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明事情处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 07:50</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed. What should Robinhood (<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>听一个知道的人说，这个过程真的有缺陷。罗宾汉应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>)-获取报告为避免IPO失败做了哪些工作？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能说周四发生了什么，谁是负责人，谁为什么辩护。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前TheStreet.com上市时我争论了什么。首先，作为创始人，我决心用股票奖励所有订阅者，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不把很多留在桌面上，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票交给好人，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到流程中，通过批量市场订单、开仓过高然后做空股票来劫持开盘。一路下跌。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给认购者。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>第二，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小的流行，这样每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，场外订单，即那些下市价订单的人，是由一家名为Knight Securities的机构分批的，而不是承销商高盛，开盘价是62美元——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少，太混乱了——交易到66美元，就像Robinhood交易到39美元然后改变，然后再也没有交易更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的都亏了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖出的每个人都赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数是在开盘时买的，我疏远了除了大狗之外的所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程虽然让客户进入，但却未能定价，因此Robinhood将钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们也知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我一直对发生的事感到后悔。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它的可怕程度震惊了，没有“从长计议”，因为从长计议很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易进行得有多糟糕，尽管它完全在承销商和委托人的范围内，所以罗宾汉留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明事情处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21\">The Street</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HOOD":"Robinhood"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152039134","content_text":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?\nI can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.\nI can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.\nSecond, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?\nThird, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.\nI lost on every single point.\nThe underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.\nSecond, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.\nThird, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.\nEveryone who bought that day lost money.\nEveryone who sold that day made money.\nNo subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.\nIt is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.\nI always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.\nWhy do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.\nSo, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.\nGreed?\nStupidity?\nHow about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.\nJust like the offering ofTheStreet.com.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HOOD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1343,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806477847,"gmtCreate":1627691832489,"gmtModify":1633757128912,"author":{"id":"3586838622547139","authorId":"3586838622547139","name":"SL69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c3538718e8a43dfdd35a99df0e2559","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586838622547139","authorIdStr":"3586838622547139"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice article. ","listText":"Nice article. ","text":"Nice article.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806477847","repostId":"1138566016","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138566016","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627689251,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138566016?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金积极分子的开放季节。基金持有人如何输赢</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138566016","media":"Barron's","summary":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasensta","content":"<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>邓普顿全球收益基金多年来一直让投资者感到沮丧。尽管明星经理迈克尔·哈森斯塔布(Michael Hasenstab)掌舵，但该封闭式基金在过去十年中的平均年回报率为0.3%，而全球收入同行的平均回报率为7%。同样令人沮丧的是，其股票的交易价格很少接近该基金的基础资产净值（NAV）。过去三年折扣平均为11%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于激进投资者Boaz Weinstein经营的对冲基金公司Saba Capital Management，投资者得到了喘息的机会。Saba持有邓普顿基金20%的股份，最近赢得了四个有争议的董事会席位。它一直在向董事会施压，要求其采取行动提振股价。其举措得到了回报：随着股价上涨，该基金今年的总回报率为4.5%，相对资产净值的折扣已缩小至4%。</blockquote></p><p> Tactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.</p><p><blockquote>像萨巴这样的策略长期以来一直激怒着共同基金公司；没有人希望对冲基金威胁政变。现在，在国会的一些帮助下，由于众议院最近提出的一项法案，竞争环境可能会向封闭式基金及其公司赞助商倾斜。这可能会损害基金投资者的利益。</blockquote></p><p> The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.</p><p><blockquote>《增加投资者机会法案》由俄亥俄州共和党众议员安东尼·冈萨雷斯（Anthony Gonzalez）和纽约州民主党众议员格雷戈里·米克斯（Gregory Meeks）于6月提出，其中包括两项措施，可能会使对冲基金更难向封闭式基金施压并赢得代理权之争。一项拟议的变化将取消目前对风险投资和私募股权基金等非流动性私募基金封闭式基金所有权15%的限制。第二项措施将阻止激进对冲基金收购封闭式基金10%以上的股份。</blockquote></p><p> A spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>冈萨雷斯的发言人拒绝置评。米克斯没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Proponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.</p><p><blockquote>这些变化的支持者表示，他们将扩大散户投资者进入私人市场的机会。他们还表示，对冲基金正在利用证券法的漏洞，以牺牲长期股东的利益为代价，给他们带来纳税义务、更高的费用和强制基金清算的负担。投资公司协会（ICI）在最近的一份声明中表示，该法案将消除“激进投资者利用该漏洞以牺牲散户投资者的利益为代价来获取短期利润”。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的对冲基金和投资组合经理表示，共同基金公司只是想保护一个资产池和费用不受股东干涉。大多数散户投资者不会在代理权竞争中投票。这可能会让基金董事会在很大程度上自由追求自己的议程。</blockquote></p><p> “Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.</p><p><blockquote>激进主义对冲基金德莱顿资本(Dryden Capital)的投资组合经理马特·巴芬顿(Matt Buffington)表示：“激进主义发挥着重要作用，如果这项法案获得通过，激进主义将更难威胁或创造变革。”</blockquote></p><p> Gregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的咨询公司Relative Value Partners的投资组合经理格雷戈里·尼尔(Gregory Neer)对此表示同意。“投资者向资金施压的能力对所有股东都有利，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Closed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.</p><p><blockquote>封闭式基金由于收益率高、分配稳健，长期以来深受投资者欢迎。许多人使用杠杆，以市场利率借钱来增加支出。他们还通过期权策略以及对股票和债券市场高收益领域的投资来产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> But the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.</p><p><blockquote>但这些基金存在结构性缺陷。根据Morningstar Direct的数据，费用率很高，平均为2.1%。由于基金有固定数量的已发行股票，价格反映了市场对基金及其基础资产的需求。基金的交易价格通常低于资产净值。虽然从理论上讲，为一美元的资产支付90美分很有吸引力，但投资者可能永远看不到额外的一毛钱。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金旨在利用这种低效率，以低于市场价值的价格购买封闭式基金。然后，他们向基金董事会施压，要求其采取措施提高基金价格。剧本很简单：积累股份，赢得董事会席位，然后迫使基金公司发起要约收购，同意以接近全价回购股票。</blockquote></p><p> If that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.</p><p><blockquote>如果失败，对冲基金可能会尝试更换基金经理，策划基金清算，或将其转换为开放式基金——这些举措也可能随着股价上涨至与资产净值平价而获得回报。像Saba这样的公司也完全接管了资金。</blockquote></p><p> Giving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tells<i>Barron’s</i>.</p><p><blockquote>给予封闭式基金持有更多私人证券的自由可能会破坏这一策略。只有当基金能够以市场价格清算其大部分持股时，要约收购才会起作用。由于风险投资和私募股权控股公司通常不公开交易，因此它们的定价并不透明。一位激进主义经理表示：“当封闭式基金投资于非流动性的东西时，它可以保护它们免受激进主义的影响。”<i>巴伦周刊</i>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Removing the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.</p><p><blockquote>共同基金行业律师托马斯·迪卡波表示，取消私募基金所有权上限“符合让散户投资者更多获得私人投资的立法议程”。</blockquote></p><p> And capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”</p><p><blockquote>将活动人士的资金限制在10%并不能阻止他们发起代理活动。“这一切都不是反民主的，”他说。“这并不能阻止大多数不满意或想要改变的投资者。它阻止了一个投资者利用其经济实力和其他人的钱，基本上迫使其他人做出改变。”</blockquote></p><p> Investor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.</p><p><blockquote>然而，投资者倡导者对此有不同的看法，他们表示，基金投资者最终可能会为持有更不透明投资的基金支付更高的费用。投资者保护组织Healthy Markets的负责人泰勒·盖拉施(Tyler Gellasch)表示：“这只是另一种基金中的基金结构，而且费用是出了名的高。”</blockquote></p><p> Individual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.</p><p><blockquote>根据1940年《投资公司法》的所有权限制，从技术上讲，个人对冲基金不能拥有封闭式基金超过3%的股份。但他们通过附属实体增持股份来规避这一规则，从而创造足够的临界质量，通过代理投票迫使基金发生变化。</blockquote></p><p> The ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.</p><p><blockquote>ICI——共同基金行业的游说团体——试图说服监管机构打击对冲基金。在去年提交给美国证券交易委员会的一份文件中，ICI辩称，对冲基金的活动往往会消耗基金的资源，引发长期投资者的纳税义务，并导致被迫出售证券以满足对冲基金的要约收购要求。如果基金被迫回购股票且资产基础萎缩，其费用率可能会上升。</blockquote></p><p> The activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.</p><p><blockquote>ICI表示，维权人士对该行业的“攻击”对产品发布产生了寒蝉效应，导致目前市场上的封闭式基金比2007年有所减少。</blockquote></p><p> But hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”</p><p><blockquote>但对冲基金认为，修改1940年法案无异于共同基金攫取权力。Bulldog Investors的联合创始人菲尔·戈尔茨坦(Phil Goldstein)表示：“这一切都来自共同基金行业，这保护了他们并非巧合。”Bulldog Investors是一位长期瞄准封闭式基金的活动家。“有些基金的业绩很糟糕，折扣很大。ICI从未说过我们需要一种机制，让股东可以让这些经理承担责任。”</blockquote></p><p> Imposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”</p><p><blockquote>设定所有权上限也会降低代理活动的经济性。仅限于10%，对冲基金不会拥有足够的股份和足够的经济利益来证明代理权竞争的费用是合理的，而代理权竞争可能会花费数百万美元。“如果你被限制在10%，并且必须将2.5%的资产用于代理活动，你会说风险太大，”戈尔茨坦说。“与此同时，管理层没有花费任何东西——只是股东的钱。他们想让举办代理权竞争在经济上失去吸引力。”</blockquote></p><p> Regulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>监管机构和法院对封闭式基金为防止股东挑战而采取的一些防御措施表示怀疑。而且，美国证券交易委员会可能不会站在基金行业一边。自2010年以来，SEC一直警告基金公司不要利用州证券法来阻止对冲基金收购。去年，在共和党主席杰伊·克莱顿的领导下，美国证券交易委员会放弃了对这些州“控股权”法的反对。但新任民主党主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)可能会恢复SEC的反对意见——这是该行业争取国会修改法律的一个理由。美国证券交易委员会没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Institutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”</p><p><blockquote>就代理投票提出建议的机构股东服务公司表示，投资者应该拒绝基金公司使用限制股东投票权的国家控股权法。ISS表示，由于SEC的观望，“CEF股东被剥夺了重要的投票权，并受到管理层的巩固。”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70323ed9daef142f19afd48be72b6299\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68beb47d59eb02e90b04eb7093f9f17b\" tg-width=\"759\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Hedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金并不总是获胜，但随着激进分子增持股份，投资者可能希望随波逐流。南卡罗来纳大学金融学副教授马特·沙无然(Matt Souther)表示：“当激进分子介入时，你通常会看到股价上涨而折扣减少。”</blockquote></p><p> Templeton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>如果Saba收购更多股票或试图接管该基金7.43亿美元的资产，Templeton Global Income（股票代码：GIM）相对于资产净值的折扣可能会进一步缩小。Saba最近接管了另一只基金Voya Prime Rate Trust的管理，并将其更名为Saba Capital Income&Opportunities(BRW)。富兰克林邓普顿和Saba拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.</p><p><blockquote>米勒/霍华德高收入股票（HIE）也是萨巴的目标。该基金是“定期信托”，强制清算日期为2024年。其交易价格较资产净值折价5.9%。封闭式RiverNorth Opportunities(RIV)联席经理帕特里克·加利(Patrick Galley)表示：“在最坏的情况下，你以折扣价购买，从现在到2024年，你将获得超额回报，因为折扣将会缩小。”拥有HIE的基金。</blockquote></p><p> Other closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).</p><p><blockquote>Saba持有股份的其他封闭式基金包括Source Capital(SOR)和Invesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA)。Bulldog在乌龟能源独立(NDP)中建立了地位。</blockquote></p><p> Some closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.</p><p><blockquote>一些封闭式基金的基本面看起来很有吸引力。Adams Diversified Equity(ADX)提供大型科技股的投资，交易价格较资产净值折价14%，并承诺年化分配至少6%。“对于预计科技股表现良好的投资者来说，ADX是一个不错的持股，”封闭式投资者兼旧金山Tepper Capital Management主管David Tepper表示。</blockquote></p><p> Sprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.</p><p><blockquote>Sprott Focus Trust（基金）是他喜欢的另一只基金。资深小盘股经理惠特尼·乔治(Whitney George)经营该公司，他的家族拥有45%的股份。其交易价格有10%的折扣，收益率为5.7%。Tepper还青睐Royce Global Value Trust(RGT)，其交易价格折扣9%，收益率为7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> None of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.</p><p><blockquote>根据证券备案文件，这些基金都没有吸引太多激进分子的参与。但如果活动人士看到机会，他们可能会涌入并向基金管理层施压——假设国会不会重写交战规则。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金积极分子的开放季节。基金持有人如何输赢</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose<blockquote>现在是封闭式基金积极分子的开放季节。基金持有人如何输赢</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barron's</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 07:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.</p><p><blockquote>邓普顿全球收益基金多年来一直让投资者感到沮丧。尽管明星经理迈克尔·哈森斯塔布(Michael Hasenstab)掌舵，但该封闭式基金在过去十年中的平均年回报率为0.3%，而全球收入同行的平均回报率为7%。同样令人沮丧的是，其股票的交易价格很少接近该基金的基础资产净值（NAV）。过去三年折扣平均为11%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于激进投资者Boaz Weinstein经营的对冲基金公司Saba Capital Management，投资者得到了喘息的机会。Saba持有邓普顿基金20%的股份，最近赢得了四个有争议的董事会席位。它一直在向董事会施压，要求其采取行动提振股价。其举措得到了回报：随着股价上涨，该基金今年的总回报率为4.5%，相对资产净值的折扣已缩小至4%。</blockquote></p><p> Tactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.</p><p><blockquote>像萨巴这样的策略长期以来一直激怒着共同基金公司；没有人希望对冲基金威胁政变。现在，在国会的一些帮助下，由于众议院最近提出的一项法案，竞争环境可能会向封闭式基金及其公司赞助商倾斜。这可能会损害基金投资者的利益。</blockquote></p><p> The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.</p><p><blockquote>《增加投资者机会法案》由俄亥俄州共和党众议员安东尼·冈萨雷斯（Anthony Gonzalez）和纽约州民主党众议员格雷戈里·米克斯（Gregory Meeks）于6月提出，其中包括两项措施，可能会使对冲基金更难向封闭式基金施压并赢得代理权之争。一项拟议的变化将取消目前对风险投资和私募股权基金等非流动性私募基金封闭式基金所有权15%的限制。第二项措施将阻止激进对冲基金收购封闭式基金10%以上的股份。</blockquote></p><p> A spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>冈萨雷斯的发言人拒绝置评。米克斯没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Proponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.</p><p><blockquote>这些变化的支持者表示，他们将扩大散户投资者进入私人市场的机会。他们还表示，对冲基金正在利用证券法的漏洞，以牺牲长期股东的利益为代价，给他们带来纳税义务、更高的费用和强制基金清算的负担。投资公司协会（ICI）在最近的一份声明中表示，该法案将消除“激进投资者利用该漏洞以牺牲散户投资者的利益为代价来获取短期利润”。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的对冲基金和投资组合经理表示，共同基金公司只是想保护一个资产池和费用不受股东干涉。大多数散户投资者不会在代理权竞争中投票。这可能会让基金董事会在很大程度上自由追求自己的议程。</blockquote></p><p> “Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.</p><p><blockquote>激进主义对冲基金德莱顿资本(Dryden Capital)的投资组合经理马特·巴芬顿(Matt Buffington)表示：“激进主义发挥着重要作用，如果这项法案获得通过，激进主义将更难威胁或创造变革。”</blockquote></p><p> Gregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.</p><p><blockquote>投资封闭式基金的咨询公司Relative Value Partners的投资组合经理格雷戈里·尼尔(Gregory Neer)对此表示同意。“投资者向资金施压的能力对所有股东都有利，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Closed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.</p><p><blockquote>封闭式基金由于收益率高、分配稳健，长期以来深受投资者欢迎。许多人使用杠杆，以市场利率借钱来增加支出。他们还通过期权策略以及对股票和债券市场高收益领域的投资来产生收入。</blockquote></p><p> But the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.</p><p><blockquote>但这些基金存在结构性缺陷。根据Morningstar Direct的数据，费用率很高，平均为2.1%。由于基金有固定数量的已发行股票，价格反映了市场对基金及其基础资产的需求。基金的交易价格通常低于资产净值。虽然从理论上讲，为一美元的资产支付90美分很有吸引力，但投资者可能永远看不到额外的一毛钱。</blockquote></p><p> Hedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金旨在利用这种低效率，以低于市场价值的价格购买封闭式基金。然后，他们向基金董事会施压，要求其采取措施提高基金价格。剧本很简单：积累股份，赢得董事会席位，然后迫使基金公司发起要约收购，同意以接近全价回购股票。</blockquote></p><p> If that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.</p><p><blockquote>如果失败，对冲基金可能会尝试更换基金经理，策划基金清算，或将其转换为开放式基金——这些举措也可能随着股价上涨至与资产净值平价而获得回报。像Saba这样的公司也完全接管了资金。</blockquote></p><p> Giving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tells<i>Barron’s</i>.</p><p><blockquote>给予封闭式基金持有更多私人证券的自由可能会破坏这一策略。只有当基金能够以市场价格清算其大部分持股时，要约收购才会起作用。由于风险投资和私募股权控股公司通常不公开交易，因此它们的定价并不透明。一位激进主义经理表示：“当封闭式基金投资于非流动性的东西时，它可以保护它们免受激进主义的影响。”<i>巴伦周刊</i>.</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Removing the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.</p><p><blockquote>共同基金行业律师托马斯·迪卡波表示，取消私募基金所有权上限“符合让散户投资者更多获得私人投资的立法议程”。</blockquote></p><p> And capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”</p><p><blockquote>将活动人士的资金限制在10%并不能阻止他们发起代理活动。“这一切都不是反民主的，”他说。“这并不能阻止大多数不满意或想要改变的投资者。它阻止了一个投资者利用其经济实力和其他人的钱，基本上迫使其他人做出改变。”</blockquote></p><p> Investor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.</p><p><blockquote>然而，投资者倡导者对此有不同的看法，他们表示，基金投资者最终可能会为持有更不透明投资的基金支付更高的费用。投资者保护组织Healthy Markets的负责人泰勒·盖拉施(Tyler Gellasch)表示：“这只是另一种基金中的基金结构，而且费用是出了名的高。”</blockquote></p><p> Individual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.</p><p><blockquote>根据1940年《投资公司法》的所有权限制，从技术上讲，个人对冲基金不能拥有封闭式基金超过3%的股份。但他们通过附属实体增持股份来规避这一规则，从而创造足够的临界质量，通过代理投票迫使基金发生变化。</blockquote></p><p> The ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.</p><p><blockquote>ICI——共同基金行业的游说团体——试图说服监管机构打击对冲基金。在去年提交给美国证券交易委员会的一份文件中，ICI辩称，对冲基金的活动往往会消耗基金的资源，引发长期投资者的纳税义务，并导致被迫出售证券以满足对冲基金的要约收购要求。如果基金被迫回购股票且资产基础萎缩，其费用率可能会上升。</blockquote></p><p> The activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.</p><p><blockquote>ICI表示，维权人士对该行业的“攻击”对产品发布产生了寒蝉效应，导致目前市场上的封闭式基金比2007年有所减少。</blockquote></p><p> But hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”</p><p><blockquote>但对冲基金认为，修改1940年法案无异于共同基金攫取权力。Bulldog Investors的联合创始人菲尔·戈尔茨坦(Phil Goldstein)表示：“这一切都来自共同基金行业，这保护了他们并非巧合。”Bulldog Investors是一位长期瞄准封闭式基金的活动家。“有些基金的业绩很糟糕，折扣很大。ICI从未说过我们需要一种机制，让股东可以让这些经理承担责任。”</blockquote></p><p> Imposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”</p><p><blockquote>设定所有权上限也会降低代理活动的经济性。仅限于10%，对冲基金不会拥有足够的股份和足够的经济利益来证明代理权竞争的费用是合理的，而代理权竞争可能会花费数百万美元。“如果你被限制在10%，并且必须将2.5%的资产用于代理活动，你会说风险太大，”戈尔茨坦说。“与此同时，管理层没有花费任何东西——只是股东的钱。他们想让举办代理权竞争在经济上失去吸引力。”</blockquote></p><p> Regulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p><p><blockquote>监管机构和法院对封闭式基金为防止股东挑战而采取的一些防御措施表示怀疑。而且，美国证券交易委员会可能不会站在基金行业一边。自2010年以来，SEC一直警告基金公司不要利用州证券法来阻止对冲基金收购。去年，在共和党主席杰伊·克莱顿的领导下，美国证券交易委员会放弃了对这些州“控股权”法的反对。但新任民主党主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)可能会恢复SEC的反对意见——这是该行业争取国会修改法律的一个理由。美国证券交易委员会没有回应置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> Institutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”</p><p><blockquote>就代理投票提出建议的机构股东服务公司表示，投资者应该拒绝基金公司使用限制股东投票权的国家控股权法。ISS表示，由于SEC的观望，“CEF股东被剥夺了重要的投票权，并受到管理层的巩固。”</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70323ed9daef142f19afd48be72b6299\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68beb47d59eb02e90b04eb7093f9f17b\" tg-width=\"759\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Hedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>对冲基金并不总是获胜，但随着激进分子增持股份，投资者可能希望随波逐流。南卡罗来纳大学金融学副教授马特·沙无然(Matt Souther)表示：“当激进分子介入时，你通常会看到股价上涨而折扣减少。”</blockquote></p><p> Templeton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>如果Saba收购更多股票或试图接管该基金7.43亿美元的资产，Templeton Global Income（股票代码：GIM）相对于资产净值的折扣可能会进一步缩小。Saba最近接管了另一只基金Voya Prime Rate Trust的管理，并将其更名为Saba Capital Income&Opportunities(BRW)。富兰克林邓普顿和Saba拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.</p><p><blockquote>米勒/霍华德高收入股票（HIE）也是萨巴的目标。该基金是“定期信托”，强制清算日期为2024年。其交易价格较资产净值折价5.9%。封闭式RiverNorth Opportunities(RIV)联席经理帕特里克·加利(Patrick Galley)表示：“在最坏的情况下，你以折扣价购买，从现在到2024年，你将获得超额回报，因为折扣将会缩小。”拥有HIE的基金。</blockquote></p><p> Other closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).</p><p><blockquote>Saba持有股份的其他封闭式基金包括Source Capital(SOR)和Invesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA)。Bulldog在乌龟能源独立(NDP)中建立了地位。</blockquote></p><p> Some closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.</p><p><blockquote>一些封闭式基金的基本面看起来很有吸引力。Adams Diversified Equity(ADX)提供大型科技股的投资，交易价格较资产净值折价14%，并承诺年化分配至少6%。“对于预计科技股表现良好的投资者来说，ADX是一个不错的持股，”封闭式投资者兼旧金山Tepper Capital Management主管David Tepper表示。</blockquote></p><p> Sprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.</p><p><blockquote>Sprott Focus Trust（基金）是他喜欢的另一只基金。资深小盘股经理惠特尼·乔治(Whitney George)经营该公司，他的家族拥有45%的股份。其交易价格有10%的折扣，收益率为5.7%。Tepper还青睐Royce Global Value Trust(RGT)，其交易价格折扣9%，收益率为7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> None of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.</p><p><blockquote>根据证券备案文件，这些基金都没有吸引太多激进分子的参与。但如果活动人士看到机会，他们可能会涌入并向基金管理层施压——假设国会不会重写交战规则。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click\">Barron's</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138566016","content_text":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.\nInvestors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.\nTactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.\nThe Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.\nA spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nProponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.\nHedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.\n“Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.\nGregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.\nClosed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.\nBut the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.\nHedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.\nIf that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.\nGiving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tellsBarron’s.\nRemoving the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.\nAnd capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”\nInvestor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.\nIndividual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.\nThe ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.\nThe activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.\nBut hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”\nImposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”\nRegulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nInstitutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”\nHedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.\nTempleton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.\nMiller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.\nOther closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).\nSome closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.\nSprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.\nNone of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1432,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806474187,"gmtCreate":1627691782749,"gmtModify":1633757129740,"author":{"id":"3586838622547139","authorId":"3586838622547139","name":"SL69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c3538718e8a43dfdd35a99df0e2559","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586838622547139","authorIdStr":"3586838622547139"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good alert","listText":"Good alert","text":"Good alert","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806474187","repostId":"2155001152","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1142,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187543099,"gmtCreate":1623760230611,"gmtModify":1634028846979,"author":{"id":"3586838622547139","authorId":"3586838622547139","name":"SL69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c3538718e8a43dfdd35a99df0e2559","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586838622547139","authorIdStr":"3586838622547139"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bullish soon","listText":"Bullish soon","text":"Bullish soon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187543099","repostId":"1129954811","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129954811","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623757841,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1129954811?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-15 19:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Royal Caribbean is issuing $650 million of five-year junk bonds<blockquote>皇家加勒比正在发行6.5亿美元的五年期垃圾债券</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129954811","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Royal Caribbean Group RCL, -2.38% said Tuesday it has commenced a private offering of $650 million o","content":"<p>Royal Caribbean Group RCL, -2.38% said Tuesday it has commenced a private offering of $650 million of five-year, high-yield bonds. </p><p><blockquote>皇家加勒比集团RCL,-2.38%周二表示，已开始私募6.5亿美元的五年期高收益债券。</blockquote></p><p> Proceeds of the deal will be used to fund the redemption of about $619.8 million of 7.25% notes that mature in 2025 that were issued by Silversea Cruise Finance Ltd., the cruise operator said in a statement. The remaining funds will be used for general corporate purposes. </p><p><blockquote>邮轮运营商在一份声明中表示，此次交易的收益将用于赎回银海邮轮金融有限公司发行的2025年到期的约6.198亿美元7.25%票据。剩余资金将用于一般公司用途。</blockquote></p><p> Shares were up 0.51% premarket and have gained 18% in the year to date, while the S&P 500 SPX, +0.18% has gained 13%.</p><p><blockquote>该股盘前上涨0.51%，今年迄今已上涨18%，而标普500 SPX指数+0.18%已上涨13%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7be375c5b14bd0e88066699dea19c74\" tg-width=\"663\" tg-height=\"440\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Royal Caribbean is issuing $650 million of five-year junk bonds<blockquote>皇家加勒比正在发行6.5亿美元的五年期垃圾债券</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRoyal Caribbean is issuing $650 million of five-year junk bonds<blockquote>皇家加勒比正在发行6.5亿美元的五年期垃圾债券</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 19:50</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Royal Caribbean Group RCL, -2.38% said Tuesday it has commenced a private offering of $650 million of five-year, high-yield bonds. </p><p><blockquote>皇家加勒比集团RCL,-2.38%周二表示，已开始私募6.5亿美元的五年期高收益债券。</blockquote></p><p> Proceeds of the deal will be used to fund the redemption of about $619.8 million of 7.25% notes that mature in 2025 that were issued by Silversea Cruise Finance Ltd., the cruise operator said in a statement. The remaining funds will be used for general corporate purposes. </p><p><blockquote>邮轮运营商在一份声明中表示，此次交易的收益将用于赎回银海邮轮金融有限公司发行的2025年到期的约6.198亿美元7.25%票据。剩余资金将用于一般公司用途。</blockquote></p><p> Shares were up 0.51% premarket and have gained 18% in the year to date, while the S&P 500 SPX, +0.18% has gained 13%.</p><p><blockquote>该股盘前上涨0.51%，今年迄今已上涨18%，而标普500 SPX指数+0.18%已上涨13%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7be375c5b14bd0e88066699dea19c74\" tg-width=\"663\" tg-height=\"440\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/royal-caribbean-is-issuing-650-million-of-five-year-junk-bonds-2021-06-15?siteid=rss&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+marketwatch%2Fmarketpulse+%28MarketWatch.com+-+MarketPulse%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RCL":"皇家加勒比邮轮"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/royal-caribbean-is-issuing-650-million-of-five-year-junk-bonds-2021-06-15?siteid=rss&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+marketwatch%2Fmarketpulse+%28MarketWatch.com+-+MarketPulse%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1129954811","content_text":"Royal Caribbean Group RCL, -2.38% said Tuesday it has commenced a private offering of $650 million of five-year, high-yield bonds. \nProceeds of the deal will be used to fund the redemption of about $619.8 million of 7.25% notes that mature in 2025 that were issued by Silversea Cruise Finance Ltd., the cruise operator said in a statement. The remaining funds will be used for general corporate purposes. \nShares were up 0.51% premarket and have gained 18% in the year to date, while the S&P 500 SPX, +0.18% has gained 13%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"RCL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1443,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187556784,"gmtCreate":1623760084848,"gmtModify":1634028852186,"author":{"id":"3586838622547139","authorId":"3586838622547139","name":"SL69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c3538718e8a43dfdd35a99df0e2559","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586838622547139","authorIdStr":"3586838622547139"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/187556784","repostId":"1127660571","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127660571","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1623760680,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1127660571?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-15 20:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127660571","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Stock futures edge up ahead of retail sales data.\nS&P 500 index is headed toward its 30th record clo","content":"<p><ul> <li>Stock futures edge up ahead of retail sales data.</li> <li>S&P 500 index is headed toward its 30th record close of the year, bolstered by gains in tech stocks.</li> <li><b>Increase in in PPI over past 12 months rises to 6.6% from 6.2%.</b></li> <li><b>U.S. retail sales minus gas and autos fall 0.8% in May.</b></li> <li><b>U.S. retail sales minus gas and autos fall 0.8% in May.</b></li> </ul> (June 15) <b>Producer prices climb 6.6% in May on annual basis, largest 12-month increase on record.</b> Producer prices rose at their fastest annual clip in nearly 11 years in May as inflation continued to build in the U.S. economy, the Labor Department reported Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>股票期货在零售销售数据公布前小幅上涨。</li><li>在科技股上涨的推动下，标普500指数即将创下今年第30个收盘纪录。</li><li><b>过去12个月PPI涨幅从6.2%升至6.6%。</b></li><li><b>美国5月份扣除汽油和汽车的零售额下降0.8%。</b></li><li><b>美国5月份扣除汽油和汽车的零售额下降0.8%。</b></li></ul>（6月15日）<b>5月份生产者价格按年率计算上涨6.6%，为有记录以来的12个月最大涨幅。</b>美国劳工部周二报告称，随着美国经济通胀持续加剧，5月份生产者价格涨幅创近11年来最快。</blockquote></p><p> On a monthly basis, the producer price index for final demand rose 0.8%, ahead of the Dow Jones estimate of 0.6%.</p><p><blockquote>按月计算，最终需求生产者价格指数上涨0.8%，高于道琼斯预期的0.6%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stock Market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>股票市场</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. stock futures edged higher Tuesday ahead of fresh data that will indicate how much Americans spent in stores, at restaurants and online last month.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周二小幅走高，新数据将显示美国人上个月在商店、餐馆和网上的支出。</blockquote></p><p> Futures tied to the S&P 500 ticked up 0.1%, indicating that the broad benchmark index is on track to notch its thirtieth record close of the year. Nasdaq-100 futures gained 0.2%, pointing togains in technology stocksafter the opening bell.</p><p><blockquote>与标普500相关的期货上涨0.1%，表明该广泛的基准指数有望创下今年第三十个收盘纪录。纳斯达克100指数期货上涨0.2%，表明开盘后科技股上涨。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:38 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 18 points, or 0.05%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 5.5 points, or 0.13%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 24.75 points, or 0.18%.</p><p><blockquote>上午8点38分。ET，道指e-minis上涨18点，涨幅0.05%，标普500 e-minis上涨5.5点，涨幅0.13%，纳斯达克100 e-minis上涨24.75点，涨幅0.18%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86af5e5e5e4faf68b304fa020ca3a033\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"487\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Investors expect that stocks will climb through the rest of the year due to easy monetary policies. Many people are also betting thathigher inflation, due to the easing of economic restrictions and supply-chain bottlenecks, will be temporary. Signs that inflation will be elevated for a prolonged period or that theFederal Reserve may retrace its supportcould shake that confidence, money managers said.</p><p><blockquote>投资者预计，由于宽松的货币政策，股市将在今年剩余时间内攀升。许多人还押注，由于经济限制和供应链瓶颈的缓解，通胀上升将是暂时的。基金经理表示，通胀将长期上升或美联储可能收回支持的迹象可能会动摇这种信心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket: Vroom, Ping Identity, Sage Therapeutics & more</b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：Vroom、Ping Identity、Sage Therapeutics等</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>1) Vroom(VRM)</b> – Vroom intends to offer $500 million in convertible senior notes due in 2026. The used-vehicle e-commerce platform provider plans to use the proceeds for a variety of corporate purposes as well as investing in or acquiring new technologies. Its shares slid 6.1% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b>1）轰鸣（VRM）</b>-Vroom打算发行2026年到期的5亿美元可转换优先票据。这家二手车电子商务平台提供商计划将所得款项用于各种企业用途以及投资或收购新技术。其股价在盘前交易中下跌6.1%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2) Ping Identity(PING) </b>– Ping Identity announced a 6 million share common stock offering, in a sale of shares held by investment funds affiliated with Vista Equity Partners. The identity management solutions company will not receive any proceeds from the offering. The stock tumbled 4.2% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b>2）PING身份（PING）</b>-Ping Identity宣布发行600万股普通股，出售Vista Equity Partners附属投资基金持有的股份。身份管理解决方案公司不会从此次发行中获得任何收益。该股在盘前下跌4.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3) Sage Therapeutics(SAGE)</b> – The drugmaker’s shares tanked 17.5% in premarket trading following the release of study results for Sage’s experimental depression drug. The treatment resulted in a statistically significant improvement in symptoms, although it could take up to six weeks to be effective and treatment may be required for months.</p><p><blockquote><b>3）Sage Therapeutics（SAGE）</b>-在Sage实验性抑郁症药物的研究结果发布后，该制药商的股价在盘前交易中下跌17.5%。该治疗导致症状的统计学显著改善，尽管可能需要长达六周才能有效，并且可能需要数月的治疗。</blockquote></p><p> <b>4) Boeing(BA) </b>– The U.S. and European Union announced aresolution of the long-standing disputeover aircraft subsidies involving Boeing and European rival Airbus. The deal suspends World Trade Organization-authorized tariffs for five years, and U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai said it could serve as a model for resolving future disputes.</p><p><blockquote><b>4）波音（BA）</b>-美国和欧盟宣布解决涉及波音公司和欧洲竞争对手空中客车公司的长期飞机补贴争端。该协议将世界贸易组织授权的关税暂停五年，美国贸易代表凯瑟琳·戴表示，该协议可以作为解决未来争端的典范。</blockquote></p><p> <b>5) Exxon Mobil(XOM) </b>– Bank of America reiterated a “buy” rating on the energy giant’s stock, predicting that Exxon Mobil would hike its dividend before the end of the year following cost-cutting measures and a rebound in oil prices.</p><p><blockquote><b>5)埃克森美孚(XOM)</b>——美国银行重申了对这家能源巨头股票的“买入”评级，预计在成本削减措施和油价反弹后，埃克森美孚将在年底前提高股息。</blockquote></p><p> <b>6) Spirit Airlines(SAVE)</b> – Spirit Airlines said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that leisure demand has continued to improve throughout the second quarter, and that it has seen operating yields strengthen as well. Citi upgraded the stock to “buy” from “neutral” following that update, and shares rallied 2.6% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b>6)精神航空(SAVE)</b>-精神航空在向美国证券交易委员会提交的文件中表示，整个第二季度休闲需求持续改善，营业收益率也有所增强。更新后，花旗将该股评级从“中性”上调至“买入”，股价在盘前上涨2.6%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>7) Fastenal(FAST)</b> – The maker of industrial and construction supplies was downgraded to “underweight” from “equal-weight” at Morgan Stanley, which notes a lull in customer acquisition as well as a stock that is already near an all-time high. The stock slid 2.2% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b>7）Fastenal（快速）</b>-摩根士丹利将这家工业和建筑用品制造商的评级从“同等权重”下调至“跑输大盘”，摩根士丹利指出客户获取陷入停滞，而且该股已接近历史高点。该股盘前下跌2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>8) AstraZeneca(AZN) </b>– AstraZeneca said an experimental monoclonal antibody treatment did not meet its main goal of preventing Covid-19 in patients who had been exposed to the virus. The company also said, however, that its Covid-19 vaccine is 92% effective against the so-called “Delta” variant of the virus.</p><p><blockquote><b>8）阿斯利康（AZN）</b>-阿斯利康表示，一种实验性单克隆抗体治疗方法没有达到其在接触过该病毒的患者中预防Covid-19的主要目标。然而，该公司还表示，其Covid-19疫苗对所谓的“Delta”病毒变种的有效率为92%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>9) Cracker Barrel(CBRL)</b> – Cracker Barrel announced a $275 million private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2026. The restaurant chain will use the proceeds to pay debt and for general corporate purposes.</p><p><blockquote><b>9）裂解桶（CBRL）</b>-Cracker Barrel宣布私募2.75亿美元2026年到期的可转换优先票据。该连锁餐厅将用所得款项偿还债务和用于一般公司用途。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>10) Novavax(NVAX)</b> – Novavax announced positive results from its first study of its Covid-19 vaccine and a flu vaccine administered simultaneously. The study suggested that simultaneous vaccination may be a viable strategy.</p><p><blockquote><b>10)诺瓦瓦克斯(NVAX)</b>-Novavax宣布其Covid-19疫苗和流感疫苗同时接种的首次研究取得积极结果。该研究表明，同时接种疫苗可能是一种可行的策略。</blockquote></p><p> <b>11) Intuit(INTU)</b> – The financial software company revealed in an SEC filing that its QuickBooks online service saw new customer acquisition grow by more than 25% year-over-year for the nine months ended April 30. Intuit shares had hit an all-time high in Monday’s trading.</p><p><blockquote><b>11）Intuit（INTU）</b>–这家金融软件公司在向SEC提交的文件中透露，截至4月30日的九个月内，其QuickBooks online服务的新客户获取量同比增长超过25%。Intuit股价在周一的交易中创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <b>12) Vimeo(VMEO)</b> – Vimeo reported that total revenue in May rose 42% from a year ago, with the video services company also seeing average revenue per user up 18%.</p><p><blockquote><b>12)Vimeo(VMEO)</b>-Vimeo报告称，5月份总收入同比增长42%，这家视频服务公司的每用户平均收入也增长了18%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Tuesday<blockquote>周二美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-15 20:38</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul> <li>Stock futures edge up ahead of retail sales data.</li> <li>S&P 500 index is headed toward its 30th record close of the year, bolstered by gains in tech stocks.</li> <li><b>Increase in in PPI over past 12 months rises to 6.6% from 6.2%.</b></li> <li><b>U.S. retail sales minus gas and autos fall 0.8% in May.</b></li> <li><b>U.S. retail sales minus gas and autos fall 0.8% in May.</b></li> </ul> (June 15) <b>Producer prices climb 6.6% in May on annual basis, largest 12-month increase on record.</b> Producer prices rose at their fastest annual clip in nearly 11 years in May as inflation continued to build in the U.S. economy, the Labor Department reported Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>股票期货在零售销售数据公布前小幅上涨。</li><li>在科技股上涨的推动下，标普500指数即将创下今年第30个收盘纪录。</li><li><b>过去12个月PPI涨幅从6.2%升至6.6%。</b></li><li><b>美国5月份扣除汽油和汽车的零售额下降0.8%。</b></li><li><b>美国5月份扣除汽油和汽车的零售额下降0.8%。</b></li></ul>（6月15日）<b>5月份生产者价格按年率计算上涨6.6%，为有记录以来的12个月最大涨幅。</b>美国劳工部周二报告称，随着美国经济通胀持续加剧，5月份生产者价格涨幅创近11年来最快。</blockquote></p><p> On a monthly basis, the producer price index for final demand rose 0.8%, ahead of the Dow Jones estimate of 0.6%.</p><p><blockquote>按月计算，最终需求生产者价格指数上涨0.8%，高于道琼斯预期的0.6%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stock Market</b></p><p><blockquote><b>股票市场</b></blockquote></p><p> U.S. stock futures edged higher Tuesday ahead of fresh data that will indicate how much Americans spent in stores, at restaurants and online last month.</p><p><blockquote>美国股指期货周二小幅走高，新数据将显示美国人上个月在商店、餐馆和网上的支出。</blockquote></p><p> Futures tied to the S&P 500 ticked up 0.1%, indicating that the broad benchmark index is on track to notch its thirtieth record close of the year. Nasdaq-100 futures gained 0.2%, pointing togains in technology stocksafter the opening bell.</p><p><blockquote>与标普500相关的期货上涨0.1%，表明该广泛的基准指数有望创下今年第三十个收盘纪录。纳斯达克100指数期货上涨0.2%，表明开盘后科技股上涨。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:38 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 18 points, or 0.05%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 5.5 points, or 0.13%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 24.75 points, or 0.18%.</p><p><blockquote>上午8点38分。ET，道指e-minis上涨18点，涨幅0.05%，标普500 e-minis上涨5.5点，涨幅0.13%，纳斯达克100 e-minis上涨24.75点，涨幅0.18%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86af5e5e5e4faf68b304fa020ca3a033\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"487\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Investors expect that stocks will climb through the rest of the year due to easy monetary policies. Many people are also betting thathigher inflation, due to the easing of economic restrictions and supply-chain bottlenecks, will be temporary. Signs that inflation will be elevated for a prolonged period or that theFederal Reserve may retrace its supportcould shake that confidence, money managers said.</p><p><blockquote>投资者预计，由于宽松的货币政策，股市将在今年剩余时间内攀升。许多人还押注，由于经济限制和供应链瓶颈的缓解，通胀上升将是暂时的。基金经理表示，通胀将长期上升或美联储可能收回支持的迹象可能会动摇这种信心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket: Vroom, Ping Identity, Sage Therapeutics & more</b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：Vroom、Ping Identity、Sage Therapeutics等</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>1) Vroom(VRM)</b> – Vroom intends to offer $500 million in convertible senior notes due in 2026. The used-vehicle e-commerce platform provider plans to use the proceeds for a variety of corporate purposes as well as investing in or acquiring new technologies. Its shares slid 6.1% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b>1）轰鸣（VRM）</b>-Vroom打算发行2026年到期的5亿美元可转换优先票据。这家二手车电子商务平台提供商计划将所得款项用于各种企业用途以及投资或收购新技术。其股价在盘前交易中下跌6.1%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2) Ping Identity(PING) </b>– Ping Identity announced a 6 million share common stock offering, in a sale of shares held by investment funds affiliated with Vista Equity Partners. The identity management solutions company will not receive any proceeds from the offering. The stock tumbled 4.2% in premarket action.</p><p><blockquote><b>2）PING身份（PING）</b>-Ping Identity宣布发行600万股普通股，出售Vista Equity Partners附属投资基金持有的股份。身份管理解决方案公司不会从此次发行中获得任何收益。该股在盘前下跌4.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3) Sage Therapeutics(SAGE)</b> – The drugmaker’s shares tanked 17.5% in premarket trading following the release of study results for Sage’s experimental depression drug. The treatment resulted in a statistically significant improvement in symptoms, although it could take up to six weeks to be effective and treatment may be required for months.</p><p><blockquote><b>3）Sage Therapeutics（SAGE）</b>-在Sage实验性抑郁症药物的研究结果发布后，该制药商的股价在盘前交易中下跌17.5%。该治疗导致症状的统计学显著改善，尽管可能需要长达六周才能有效，并且可能需要数月的治疗。</blockquote></p><p> <b>4) Boeing(BA) </b>– The U.S. and European Union announced aresolution of the long-standing disputeover aircraft subsidies involving Boeing and European rival Airbus. The deal suspends World Trade Organization-authorized tariffs for five years, and U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai said it could serve as a model for resolving future disputes.</p><p><blockquote><b>4）波音（BA）</b>-美国和欧盟宣布解决涉及波音公司和欧洲竞争对手空中客车公司的长期飞机补贴争端。该协议将世界贸易组织授权的关税暂停五年，美国贸易代表凯瑟琳·戴表示，该协议可以作为解决未来争端的典范。</blockquote></p><p> <b>5) Exxon Mobil(XOM) </b>– Bank of America reiterated a “buy” rating on the energy giant’s stock, predicting that Exxon Mobil would hike its dividend before the end of the year following cost-cutting measures and a rebound in oil prices.</p><p><blockquote><b>5)埃克森美孚(XOM)</b>——美国银行重申了对这家能源巨头股票的“买入”评级，预计在成本削减措施和油价反弹后，埃克森美孚将在年底前提高股息。</blockquote></p><p> <b>6) Spirit Airlines(SAVE)</b> – Spirit Airlines said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that leisure demand has continued to improve throughout the second quarter, and that it has seen operating yields strengthen as well. Citi upgraded the stock to “buy” from “neutral” following that update, and shares rallied 2.6% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b>6)精神航空(SAVE)</b>-精神航空在向美国证券交易委员会提交的文件中表示，整个第二季度休闲需求持续改善，营业收益率也有所增强。更新后，花旗将该股评级从“中性”上调至“买入”，股价在盘前上涨2.6%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>7) Fastenal(FAST)</b> – The maker of industrial and construction supplies was downgraded to “underweight” from “equal-weight” at Morgan Stanley, which notes a lull in customer acquisition as well as a stock that is already near an all-time high. The stock slid 2.2% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b>7）Fastenal（快速）</b>-摩根士丹利将这家工业和建筑用品制造商的评级从“同等权重”下调至“跑输大盘”，摩根士丹利指出客户获取陷入停滞，而且该股已接近历史高点。该股盘前下跌2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>8) AstraZeneca(AZN) </b>– AstraZeneca said an experimental monoclonal antibody treatment did not meet its main goal of preventing Covid-19 in patients who had been exposed to the virus. The company also said, however, that its Covid-19 vaccine is 92% effective against the so-called “Delta” variant of the virus.</p><p><blockquote><b>8）阿斯利康（AZN）</b>-阿斯利康表示，一种实验性单克隆抗体治疗方法没有达到其在接触过该病毒的患者中预防Covid-19的主要目标。然而，该公司还表示，其Covid-19疫苗对所谓的“Delta”病毒变种的有效率为92%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>9) Cracker Barrel(CBRL)</b> – Cracker Barrel announced a $275 million private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2026. The restaurant chain will use the proceeds to pay debt and for general corporate purposes.</p><p><blockquote><b>9）裂解桶（CBRL）</b>-Cracker Barrel宣布私募2.75亿美元2026年到期的可转换优先票据。该连锁餐厅将用所得款项偿还债务和用于一般公司用途。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <b>10) Novavax(NVAX)</b> – Novavax announced positive results from its first study of its Covid-19 vaccine and a flu vaccine administered simultaneously. The study suggested that simultaneous vaccination may be a viable strategy.</p><p><blockquote><b>10)诺瓦瓦克斯(NVAX)</b>-Novavax宣布其Covid-19疫苗和流感疫苗同时接种的首次研究取得积极结果。该研究表明，同时接种疫苗可能是一种可行的策略。</blockquote></p><p> <b>11) Intuit(INTU)</b> – The financial software company revealed in an SEC filing that its QuickBooks online service saw new customer acquisition grow by more than 25% year-over-year for the nine months ended April 30. Intuit shares had hit an all-time high in Monday’s trading.</p><p><blockquote><b>11）Intuit（INTU）</b>–这家金融软件公司在向SEC提交的文件中透露，截至4月30日的九个月内，其QuickBooks online服务的新客户获取量同比增长超过25%。Intuit股价在周一的交易中创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <b>12) Vimeo(VMEO)</b> – Vimeo reported that total revenue in May rose 42% from a year ago, with the video services company also seeing average revenue per user up 18%.</p><p><blockquote><b>12)Vimeo(VMEO)</b>-Vimeo报告称，5月份总收入同比增长42%，这家视频服务公司的每用户平均收入也增长了18%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127660571","content_text":"Stock futures edge up ahead of retail sales data.\nS&P 500 index is headed toward its 30th record close of the year, bolstered by gains in tech stocks.\nIncrease in in PPI over past 12 months rises to 6.6% from 6.2%.\nU.S. retail sales minus gas and autos fall 0.8% in May.\nU.S. retail sales minus gas and autos fall 0.8% in May.\n\n(June 15) Producer prices climb 6.6% in May on annual basis, largest 12-month increase on record. Producer prices rose at their fastest annual clip in nearly 11 years in May as inflation continued to build in the U.S. economy, the Labor Department reported Tuesday.\nOn a monthly basis, the producer price index for final demand rose 0.8%, ahead of the Dow Jones estimate of 0.6%.\nStock Market\nU.S. stock futures edged higher Tuesday ahead of fresh data that will indicate how much Americans spent in stores, at restaurants and online last month.\nFutures tied to the S&P 500 ticked up 0.1%, indicating that the broad benchmark index is on track to notch its thirtieth record close of the year. Nasdaq-100 futures gained 0.2%, pointing togains in technology stocksafter the opening bell.\nAt 8:38 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 18 points, or 0.05%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 5.5 points, or 0.13%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 24.75 points, or 0.18%.\n\nInvestors expect that stocks will climb through the rest of the year due to easy monetary policies. Many people are also betting thathigher inflation, due to the easing of economic restrictions and supply-chain bottlenecks, will be temporary. Signs that inflation will be elevated for a prolonged period or that theFederal Reserve may retrace its supportcould shake that confidence, money managers said.\nStocks making the biggest moves in the premarket: Vroom, Ping Identity, Sage Therapeutics & more\n1) Vroom(VRM) – Vroom intends to offer $500 million in convertible senior notes due in 2026. The used-vehicle e-commerce platform provider plans to use the proceeds for a variety of corporate purposes as well as investing in or acquiring new technologies. Its shares slid 6.1% in premarket trading.\n2) Ping Identity(PING) – Ping Identity announced a 6 million share common stock offering, in a sale of shares held by investment funds affiliated with Vista Equity Partners. The identity management solutions company will not receive any proceeds from the offering. The stock tumbled 4.2% in premarket action.\n3) Sage Therapeutics(SAGE) – The drugmaker’s shares tanked 17.5% in premarket trading following the release of study results for Sage’s experimental depression drug. The treatment resulted in a statistically significant improvement in symptoms, although it could take up to six weeks to be effective and treatment may be required for months.\n4) Boeing(BA) – The U.S. and European Union announced aresolution of the long-standing disputeover aircraft subsidies involving Boeing and European rival Airbus. The deal suspends World Trade Organization-authorized tariffs for five years, and U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai said it could serve as a model for resolving future disputes.\n5) Exxon Mobil(XOM) – Bank of America reiterated a “buy” rating on the energy giant’s stock, predicting that Exxon Mobil would hike its dividend before the end of the year following cost-cutting measures and a rebound in oil prices.\n6) Spirit Airlines(SAVE) – Spirit Airlines said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that leisure demand has continued to improve throughout the second quarter, and that it has seen operating yields strengthen as well. Citi upgraded the stock to “buy” from “neutral” following that update, and shares rallied 2.6% in the premarket.\n7) Fastenal(FAST) – The maker of industrial and construction supplies was downgraded to “underweight” from “equal-weight” at Morgan Stanley, which notes a lull in customer acquisition as well as a stock that is already near an all-time high. The stock slid 2.2% in the premarket.\n8) AstraZeneca(AZN) – AstraZeneca said an experimental monoclonal antibody treatment did not meet its main goal of preventing Covid-19 in patients who had been exposed to the virus. The company also said, however, that its Covid-19 vaccine is 92% effective against the so-called “Delta” variant of the virus.\n9) Cracker Barrel(CBRL) – Cracker Barrel announced a $275 million private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2026. The restaurant chain will use the proceeds to pay debt and for general corporate purposes.\n10) Novavax(NVAX) – Novavax announced positive results from its first study of its Covid-19 vaccine and a flu vaccine administered simultaneously. The study suggested that simultaneous vaccination may be a viable strategy.\n11) Intuit(INTU) – The financial software company revealed in an SEC filing that its QuickBooks online service saw new customer acquisition grow by more than 25% year-over-year for the nine months ended April 30. Intuit shares had hit an all-time high in Monday’s trading.\n12) Vimeo(VMEO) – Vimeo reported that total revenue in May rose 42% from a year ago, with the video services company also seeing average revenue per user up 18%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1381,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}