个人中心 - 老虎社区

LimZhiHao

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 4帖子 · 4
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- LimZhiHaoLimZhiHao
  ·2021-07-18
  Hi
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  536 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- LimZhiHaoLimZhiHao
  ·2021-07-14
  Hi
  Consumer Price Inflation: Facts vs. Fiction<blockquote>消费者价格通胀：事实与虚构</blockquote>
  Consumer prices (CPI) increased at an annualized rate of 7.3% during the first six months of 2021, w
  Consumer Price Inflation: Facts vs. Fiction<blockquote>消费者价格通胀：事实与虚构</blockquote>
  721 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- LimZhiHaoLimZhiHao
  ·2021-07-14
  Hi
  Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion "Human Infrastructure" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>
  Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of Presid
  Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion "Human Infrastructure" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>
  1,331 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- LimZhiHaoLimZhiHao
  ·2021-07-14
  Hi
  Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion "Human Infrastructure" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>
  Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of Presid
  Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion "Human Infrastructure" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>
  797 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4089336447545430","uuid":"4089336447545430","gmtCreate":1626233384080,"gmtModify":1626234558527,"name":"LimZhiHao","pinyin":"limzhihao","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3d51af908e2c45d717f209b100bedb4","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":0,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":3,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[],"userBadgeCount":0,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":173350578,"gmtCreate":1626620292694,"gmtModify":1633925453701,"author":{"id":"4089336447545430","authorId":"4089336447545430","name":"LimZhiHao","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3d51af908e2c45d717f209b100bedb4","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089336447545430","idStr":"4089336447545430"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173350578","repostId":"1183956332","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":536,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":145408599,"gmtCreate":1626234210811,"gmtModify":1633928757122,"author":{"id":"4089336447545430","authorId":"4089336447545430","name":"LimZhiHao","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3d51af908e2c45d717f209b100bedb4","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089336447545430","idStr":"4089336447545430"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/145408599","repostId":"1141016201","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141016201","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626232753,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1141016201?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-14 11:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Price Inflation: Facts vs. Fiction<blockquote>消费者价格通胀：事实与虚构</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141016201","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Consumer prices (CPI) increased at an annualized rate of 7.3% during the first six months of 2021, w","content":"<p>Consumer prices (CPI) increased at an annualized rate of 7.3% during the first six months of 2021, while core consumer prices rose 6.2%. Both represent the most significant gains in several decades. As important as the rise in consumer prices is for the general public and policymakers, there still is a lot of misinformation and false statements about the current inflation cycle. Below are some of the misstatements and false impressions.</p><p><blockquote>2021年前六个月，消费者价格（CPI）年化增长率为7.3%，核心消费者价格上涨6.2%。两者都代表了几十年来最显着的收益。尽管消费者价格上涨对公众和政策制定者来说很重要，但关于当前通胀周期仍然存在许多错误信息和虚假陈述。以下是一些错误陈述和错误印象。</blockquote></p><p> <b>CPI inflation of 2021 is not as high as that of the 1970s---False.</b>It's not possible to compare inflation across several decades because of significant changes in measurement. The CPI of the 1970s included house price inflation, and the current measure does not.</p><p><blockquote><b>2021年的CPI通胀没有20世纪70年代高——假的。</b>由于衡量标准发生了重大变化，不可能比较几十年的通货膨胀。20世纪70年代的CPI包含了房价通胀，而目前的衡量标准没有。</blockquote></p><p> Here's a simple illustration of how significant including and not including house price inflation can be. In 1979, CPI rose 11.3%, and that included a 14% increase in the price of existing homes. In the past twelve months, CPI has increased 5.4%, and the 23% increase in existing home prices is not part of that. Government statisticians have created an arbitrary owner rent index (up 2.3% in the past year) to replace house prices.</p><p><blockquote>这里有一个简单的例子，说明包括和不包括房价通胀有多重要。1979年，CPI上涨了11.3%，其中现房价格上涨了14%。在过去的12个月里，CPI上涨了5.4%，现房价格上涨23%并不在其中。政府统计人员创造了一个任意的业主租金指数（过去一年上涨了2.3%）来取代房价。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b76bd1d683d08e17201c0b78a1cba720\" tg-width=\"727\" tg-height=\"417\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Owner housing accounts for nearly one-fourth of the CPI index, so one can guestimate how much current inflation would be if the same measurement practices were still in place. My guess is it would be double-digits.</p><p><blockquote>自有住房占CPI指数的近四分之一，因此人们可以猜测，如果同样的衡量做法仍然存在，当前的通货膨胀率会是多少。我猜会是两位数。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Inflation in one market can be inferred by inflation in another market---False.</b>Accurate price measurement can only occur if there is a direct sampling of a consumer item or market or a record of actual transactions. The current estimate of owners' rent comes from the tenant market. The tenant market and the owners' market are fundamentally different in character, location, and, most importantly, vacancy rates. As is the case nowadays, homeowners would base their rent estimates on the shrinking availability of homes on the market and housing inflation in a red-hot market. The current measurement approach creates a considerable error in the reported inflation statistics by relying on the tenant market for price inflation for owners.</p><p><blockquote><b>一个市场的通货膨胀可以通过另一个市场的通货膨胀来推断---假。</b>只有在对消费品或市场进行直接抽样或有实际交易记录的情况下，才能进行准确的价格测量。目前业主对租金的预估来自租户市场。租户市场和业主市场在性质、位置以及最重要的空置率方面有着根本的不同。正如现在的情况一样，房主会根据市场上房屋供应量的减少和火热市场中的住房通胀来估算租金。目前的衡量方法依赖租户市场来衡量业主的价格通胀，从而在报告的通胀统计数据中产生了相当大的误差。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Long-lived items are not part of the CPI---False</b>. One of the arguments for not including house prices in the CPI is it a long-lived asset that consumers consume over a series of years. If CPI were only to have perishable items or used in a short time, then it would include food and energy and a few other products and services. But the CPI already includes items that consumers consume over long periods.</p><p><blockquote><b>长寿项目不是CPI的一部分---假</b>不将房价纳入CPI的一个理由是，它是一种长期资产，消费者会在一系列年内消费。如果CPI只有易腐物品或在短时间内使用，那么它将包括食品和能源以及一些其他产品和服务。但CPI已经包括了消费者长期消费的项目。</blockquote></p><p> For example, used cars and trucks are in the CPI, and their life span can run more than a decade. That's not as long as housing, but it still is significant. Used cars and trucks prices have a weight of 3% in the CPI, and house prices have a zero weight. Does that make any sense?</p><p><blockquote>例如，二手车和卡车在CPI中，它们的寿命可以超过十年。这没有住房那么长，但仍然很重要。二手车和卡车价格在CPI中的权重为3%，房价的权重为零。这有意义吗？</blockquote></p><p> The inflation cycle of 2021 is unlike anything experienced in decades. It is fast and broad, and one of the most surprising features is that owners' housing costs are running less than half as fast as the core. Owners' rent index will accelerate in the coming months as market rents continue to increase.</p><p><blockquote>2021年的通胀周期不同于几十年来经历的任何通胀周期。它是快速和广泛的，最令人惊讶的特征之一是业主的住房成本运行速度不到核心的一半。随着市场租金继续上涨，未来几个月业主租金指数将加速上涨。</blockquote></p><p> In my view, policymakers are continuing to promote a public perception of inflation that is false.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，政策制定者正在继续宣传公众对通胀的错误看法。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Price Inflation: Facts vs. Fiction<blockquote>消费者价格通胀：事实与虚构</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Price Inflation: Facts vs. Fiction<blockquote>消费者价格通胀：事实与虚构</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-14 11:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Consumer prices (CPI) increased at an annualized rate of 7.3% during the first six months of 2021, while core consumer prices rose 6.2%. Both represent the most significant gains in several decades. As important as the rise in consumer prices is for the general public and policymakers, there still is a lot of misinformation and false statements about the current inflation cycle. Below are some of the misstatements and false impressions.</p><p><blockquote>2021年前六个月，消费者价格（CPI）年化增长率为7.3%，核心消费者价格上涨6.2%。两者都代表了几十年来最显着的收益。尽管消费者价格上涨对公众和政策制定者来说很重要，但关于当前通胀周期仍然存在许多错误信息和虚假陈述。以下是一些错误陈述和错误印象。</blockquote></p><p> <b>CPI inflation of 2021 is not as high as that of the 1970s---False.</b>It's not possible to compare inflation across several decades because of significant changes in measurement. The CPI of the 1970s included house price inflation, and the current measure does not.</p><p><blockquote><b>2021年的CPI通胀没有20世纪70年代高——假的。</b>由于衡量标准发生了重大变化，不可能比较几十年的通货膨胀。20世纪70年代的CPI包含了房价通胀，而目前的衡量标准没有。</blockquote></p><p> Here's a simple illustration of how significant including and not including house price inflation can be. In 1979, CPI rose 11.3%, and that included a 14% increase in the price of existing homes. In the past twelve months, CPI has increased 5.4%, and the 23% increase in existing home prices is not part of that. Government statisticians have created an arbitrary owner rent index (up 2.3% in the past year) to replace house prices.</p><p><blockquote>这里有一个简单的例子，说明包括和不包括房价通胀有多重要。1979年，CPI上涨了11.3%，其中现房价格上涨了14%。在过去的12个月里，CPI上涨了5.4%，现房价格上涨23%并不在其中。政府统计人员创造了一个任意的业主租金指数（过去一年上涨了2.3%）来取代房价。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b76bd1d683d08e17201c0b78a1cba720\" tg-width=\"727\" tg-height=\"417\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Owner housing accounts for nearly one-fourth of the CPI index, so one can guestimate how much current inflation would be if the same measurement practices were still in place. My guess is it would be double-digits.</p><p><blockquote>自有住房占CPI指数的近四分之一，因此人们可以猜测，如果同样的衡量做法仍然存在，当前的通货膨胀率会是多少。我猜会是两位数。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Inflation in one market can be inferred by inflation in another market---False.</b>Accurate price measurement can only occur if there is a direct sampling of a consumer item or market or a record of actual transactions. The current estimate of owners' rent comes from the tenant market. The tenant market and the owners' market are fundamentally different in character, location, and, most importantly, vacancy rates. As is the case nowadays, homeowners would base their rent estimates on the shrinking availability of homes on the market and housing inflation in a red-hot market. The current measurement approach creates a considerable error in the reported inflation statistics by relying on the tenant market for price inflation for owners.</p><p><blockquote><b>一个市场的通货膨胀可以通过另一个市场的通货膨胀来推断---假。</b>只有在对消费品或市场进行直接抽样或有实际交易记录的情况下，才能进行准确的价格测量。目前业主对租金的预估来自租户市场。租户市场和业主市场在性质、位置以及最重要的空置率方面有着根本的不同。正如现在的情况一样，房主会根据市场上房屋供应量的减少和火热市场中的住房通胀来估算租金。目前的衡量方法依赖租户市场来衡量业主的价格通胀，从而在报告的通胀统计数据中产生了相当大的误差。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Long-lived items are not part of the CPI---False</b>. One of the arguments for not including house prices in the CPI is it a long-lived asset that consumers consume over a series of years. If CPI were only to have perishable items or used in a short time, then it would include food and energy and a few other products and services. But the CPI already includes items that consumers consume over long periods.</p><p><blockquote><b>长寿项目不是CPI的一部分---假</b>不将房价纳入CPI的一个理由是，它是一种长期资产，消费者会在一系列年内消费。如果CPI只有易腐物品或在短时间内使用，那么它将包括食品和能源以及一些其他产品和服务。但CPI已经包括了消费者长期消费的项目。</blockquote></p><p> For example, used cars and trucks are in the CPI, and their life span can run more than a decade. That's not as long as housing, but it still is significant. Used cars and trucks prices have a weight of 3% in the CPI, and house prices have a zero weight. Does that make any sense?</p><p><blockquote>例如，二手车和卡车在CPI中，它们的寿命可以超过十年。这没有住房那么长，但仍然很重要。二手车和卡车价格在CPI中的权重为3%，房价的权重为零。这有意义吗？</blockquote></p><p> The inflation cycle of 2021 is unlike anything experienced in decades. It is fast and broad, and one of the most surprising features is that owners' housing costs are running less than half as fast as the core. Owners' rent index will accelerate in the coming months as market rents continue to increase.</p><p><blockquote>2021年的通胀周期不同于几十年来经历的任何通胀周期。它是快速和广泛的，最令人惊讶的特征之一是业主的住房成本运行速度不到核心的一半。随着市场租金继续上涨，未来几个月业主租金指数将加速上涨。</blockquote></p><p> In my view, policymakers are continuing to promote a public perception of inflation that is false.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，政策制定者正在继续宣传公众对通胀的错误看法。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/consumer-price-inflation-facts-vs-fiction\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/consumer-price-inflation-facts-vs-fiction","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141016201","content_text":"Consumer prices (CPI) increased at an annualized rate of 7.3% during the first six months of 2021, while core consumer prices rose 6.2%. Both represent the most significant gains in several decades. As important as the rise in consumer prices is for the general public and policymakers, there still is a lot of misinformation and false statements about the current inflation cycle. Below are some of the misstatements and false impressions.\nCPI inflation of 2021 is not as high as that of the 1970s---False.It's not possible to compare inflation across several decades because of significant changes in measurement. The CPI of the 1970s included house price inflation, and the current measure does not.\nHere's a simple illustration of how significant including and not including house price inflation can be. In 1979, CPI rose 11.3%, and that included a 14% increase in the price of existing homes. In the past twelve months, CPI has increased 5.4%, and the 23% increase in existing home prices is not part of that. Government statisticians have created an arbitrary owner rent index (up 2.3% in the past year) to replace house prices.\n\nOwner housing accounts for nearly one-fourth of the CPI index, so one can guestimate how much current inflation would be if the same measurement practices were still in place. My guess is it would be double-digits.\nInflation in one market can be inferred by inflation in another market---False.Accurate price measurement can only occur if there is a direct sampling of a consumer item or market or a record of actual transactions. The current estimate of owners' rent comes from the tenant market. The tenant market and the owners' market are fundamentally different in character, location, and, most importantly, vacancy rates. As is the case nowadays, homeowners would base their rent estimates on the shrinking availability of homes on the market and housing inflation in a red-hot market. The current measurement approach creates a considerable error in the reported inflation statistics by relying on the tenant market for price inflation for owners.\nLong-lived items are not part of the CPI---False. One of the arguments for not including house prices in the CPI is it a long-lived asset that consumers consume over a series of years. If CPI were only to have perishable items or used in a short time, then it would include food and energy and a few other products and services. But the CPI already includes items that consumers consume over long periods.\nFor example, used cars and trucks are in the CPI, and their life span can run more than a decade. That's not as long as housing, but it still is significant. Used cars and trucks prices have a weight of 3% in the CPI, and house prices have a zero weight. Does that make any sense?\nThe inflation cycle of 2021 is unlike anything experienced in decades. It is fast and broad, and one of the most surprising features is that owners' housing costs are running less than half as fast as the core. Owners' rent index will accelerate in the coming months as market rents continue to increase.\nIn my view, policymakers are continuing to promote a public perception of inflation that is false.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":721,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":145401178,"gmtCreate":1626234125294,"gmtModify":1633928758497,"author":{"id":"4089336447545430","authorId":"4089336447545430","name":"LimZhiHao","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3d51af908e2c45d717f209b100bedb4","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089336447545430","idStr":"4089336447545430"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/145401178","repostId":"1153057412","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153057412","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626232523,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1153057412?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-14 11:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion \"Human Infrastructure\" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153057412","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of Presid","content":"<p>Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of President Biden's massive two-part \"Build Back Better\" infrastructure plan, Chuck Schumer, the Democrats' leader in the Senate, just announced that Democrats have united behind a $3.5 trillion \"infrastructure\" spending package, which they can now pass using special budget rules allowing them to circumvent the filibuster.</p><p><blockquote>在拜登政府及其国会盟友泄露拜登总统由两部分组成的大规模“重建得更好”基础设施计划的第一个细节几个月后，参议院民主党领袖查克·舒默刚刚宣布，民主党已团结起来支持3.5万亿美元的“基础设施”支出计划，他们现在可以使用特殊预算规则通过该计划，使他们能够绕过阻挠。</blockquote></p><p> In a late-night announcement Tuesday, Schumer said the Budget Committee had reached an agreement to allot $3.5 trillion for a spending package that would complete President Biden’s infrastructure plan.</p><p><blockquote>舒默在周二深夜的一份声明中表示，预算委员会已达成协议，为一项支出计划拨款3.5万亿美元，以完成拜登总统的基础设施计划。</blockquote></p><p>   \"The Budget Committee has come to an agreement,\" Sen. Schumer told reporters Tuesday night following a closed-door meeting with Democratic lawmakers.  The deal adds to the $600 billion package of infrastructure measures that Biden has struck with Republicans.</p><p><blockquote>“预算委员会已经达成协议，”参议员舒默周二晚上在与民主党议员举行闭门会议后告诉记者。该协议是拜登与共和党达成的6000亿美元一揽子基础设施措施的补充。</blockquote></p><p>   \"You add that to that the $600 billion in a bipartisan plan and you get to $4.1 trillion, which is very, very close to what President Biden has asked us for,\" Schumer said. \"Every major program that President Biden has asked us for is funded in a robust way.\"  The package will include such \"infrastructure\" priorities like expanding Medicare, addressing climate change, expanding childcare (after the administration just approved a new $300 handout for couples with children)&nbsp; and education. The Democrats have famously deemed all this \"human infrastructure\", which Republicans have vowed to reject.</p><p><blockquote>舒默说：“再加上两党计划中的6000亿美元，就会达到4.1万亿美元，这非常非常接近拜登总统向我们提出的要求。”“拜登总统要求我们实施的每一个重大项目都得到了充足的资助。”该计划将包括“基础设施”优先事项，如扩大医疗保险、应对气候变化、扩大儿童保育（在政府刚刚批准为有孩子的夫妇提供300美元的新施舍后）和教育。众所周知，民主党人认为所有这些都是“人类基础设施”，而共和党人发誓要拒绝这一点。</blockquote></p><p> Democrats will meet with Biden Wednesday, the majority leader said following the closed-door meeting.</p><p><blockquote>多数党领袖在闭门会议后表示，民主党人将于周三会见拜登。</blockquote></p><p>   \"We are very proud of this plan. We know we have a long road to go. We're going to get this done for the sake of making average Americans' lives a whole lot better,\" Schumer said  Previously, Schumer has promised to hold votes on both pieces of legislation before the Senate breaks for its August recess, which amounts to a pretty aggressive timeline, especially since some Republicans might rethink their support for the earlier measure now that Democrats are pushing ahead with the bigger multi-trillion-dollar package.</p><p><blockquote>舒默表示：“我们对这项计划感到非常自豪。我们知道我们还有很长的路要走。为了让普通美国人的生活变得更好，我们将完成这项工作。”此前，舒默曾承诺在参议院八月份休会之前就这两项立法进行投票，这相当于一个相当激进的时间表，特别是因为现在民主党正在推进更大的数万亿美元一揽子计划，一些共和党人可能会重新考虑他们对早期措施的支持。</blockquote></p><p> To be clear, the bipartisan deal struck by Biden authorizes a total of $1.2 trillion in spending over eight years. Meanwhile, the budget resolution necessary to pass the Democratic-only bill will require some more maneuvering.</p><p><blockquote>需要明确的是，拜登达成的两党协议授权在八年内总共支出1.2万亿美元。与此同时，通过民主党专用法案所需的预算决议将需要更多的操作。</blockquote></p><p> Senate Democrats want to bring the bipartisan infrastructure&nbsp;bill to the floor as soon as next week, though negotiators have warned that is an ambitious pace. Democrats didn't say on Tuesday night when specifically they would be ready to take the budget resolution to the floor. To pass both the budget resolution and a&nbsp;subsequent&nbsp;$3 to $5-trillion infrastructure bill through the Senate Democrats will need total unity from all 50 of their members. Democrats declined to say on Tuesday night if they had unified support.</p><p><blockquote>参议院民主党人希望最早在下周将两党基础设施法案提交议会，尽管谈判代表警告说这是一个雄心勃勃的步伐。民主党人周二晚上没有透露他们何时准备好将预算决议提交议会。为了在参议院通过预算决议和随后的3至5万亿美元基础设施法案，民主党需要所有50名成员的完全团结。民主党人周二晚上拒绝透露他们是否得到了统一的支持。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion \"Human Infrastructure\" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDemocrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion \"Human Infrastructure\" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-14 11:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of President Biden's massive two-part \"Build Back Better\" infrastructure plan, Chuck Schumer, the Democrats' leader in the Senate, just announced that Democrats have united behind a $3.5 trillion \"infrastructure\" spending package, which they can now pass using special budget rules allowing them to circumvent the filibuster.</p><p><blockquote>在拜登政府及其国会盟友泄露拜登总统由两部分组成的大规模“重建得更好”基础设施计划的第一个细节几个月后，参议院民主党领袖查克·舒默刚刚宣布，民主党已团结起来支持3.5万亿美元的“基础设施”支出计划，他们现在可以使用特殊预算规则通过该计划，使他们能够绕过阻挠。</blockquote></p><p> In a late-night announcement Tuesday, Schumer said the Budget Committee had reached an agreement to allot $3.5 trillion for a spending package that would complete President Biden’s infrastructure plan.</p><p><blockquote>舒默在周二深夜的一份声明中表示，预算委员会已达成协议，为一项支出计划拨款3.5万亿美元，以完成拜登总统的基础设施计划。</blockquote></p><p>   \"The Budget Committee has come to an agreement,\" Sen. Schumer told reporters Tuesday night following a closed-door meeting with Democratic lawmakers.  The deal adds to the $600 billion package of infrastructure measures that Biden has struck with Republicans.</p><p><blockquote>“预算委员会已经达成协议，”参议员舒默周二晚上在与民主党议员举行闭门会议后告诉记者。该协议是拜登与共和党达成的6000亿美元一揽子基础设施措施的补充。</blockquote></p><p>   \"You add that to that the $600 billion in a bipartisan plan and you get to $4.1 trillion, which is very, very close to what President Biden has asked us for,\" Schumer said. \"Every major program that President Biden has asked us for is funded in a robust way.\"  The package will include such \"infrastructure\" priorities like expanding Medicare, addressing climate change, expanding childcare (after the administration just approved a new $300 handout for couples with children)&nbsp; and education. The Democrats have famously deemed all this \"human infrastructure\", which Republicans have vowed to reject.</p><p><blockquote>舒默说：“再加上两党计划中的6000亿美元，就会达到4.1万亿美元，这非常非常接近拜登总统向我们提出的要求。”“拜登总统要求我们实施的每一个重大项目都得到了充足的资助。”该计划将包括“基础设施”优先事项，如扩大医疗保险、应对气候变化、扩大儿童保育（在政府刚刚批准为有孩子的夫妇提供300美元的新施舍后）和教育。众所周知，民主党人认为所有这些都是“人类基础设施”，而共和党人发誓要拒绝这一点。</blockquote></p><p> Democrats will meet with Biden Wednesday, the majority leader said following the closed-door meeting.</p><p><blockquote>多数党领袖在闭门会议后表示，民主党人将于周三会见拜登。</blockquote></p><p>   \"We are very proud of this plan. We know we have a long road to go. We're going to get this done for the sake of making average Americans' lives a whole lot better,\" Schumer said  Previously, Schumer has promised to hold votes on both pieces of legislation before the Senate breaks for its August recess, which amounts to a pretty aggressive timeline, especially since some Republicans might rethink their support for the earlier measure now that Democrats are pushing ahead with the bigger multi-trillion-dollar package.</p><p><blockquote>舒默表示：“我们对这项计划感到非常自豪。我们知道我们还有很长的路要走。为了让普通美国人的生活变得更好，我们将完成这项工作。”此前，舒默曾承诺在参议院八月份休会之前就这两项立法进行投票，这相当于一个相当激进的时间表，特别是因为现在民主党正在推进更大的数万亿美元一揽子计划，一些共和党人可能会重新考虑他们对早期措施的支持。</blockquote></p><p> To be clear, the bipartisan deal struck by Biden authorizes a total of $1.2 trillion in spending over eight years. Meanwhile, the budget resolution necessary to pass the Democratic-only bill will require some more maneuvering.</p><p><blockquote>需要明确的是，拜登达成的两党协议授权在八年内总共支出1.2万亿美元。与此同时，通过民主党专用法案所需的预算决议将需要更多的操作。</blockquote></p><p> Senate Democrats want to bring the bipartisan infrastructure&nbsp;bill to the floor as soon as next week, though negotiators have warned that is an ambitious pace. Democrats didn't say on Tuesday night when specifically they would be ready to take the budget resolution to the floor. To pass both the budget resolution and a&nbsp;subsequent&nbsp;$3 to $5-trillion infrastructure bill through the Senate Democrats will need total unity from all 50 of their members. Democrats declined to say on Tuesday night if they had unified support.</p><p><blockquote>参议院民主党人希望最早在下周将两党基础设施法案提交议会，尽管谈判代表警告说这是一个雄心勃勃的步伐。民主党人周二晚上没有透露他们何时准备好将预算决议提交议会。为了在参议院通过预算决议和随后的3至5万亿美元基础设施法案，民主党需要所有50名成员的完全团结。民主党人周二晚上拒绝透露他们是否得到了统一的支持。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-strike-deal-35-trillion-human-infrastructure-package?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-strike-deal-35-trillion-human-infrastructure-package?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153057412","content_text":"Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of President Biden's massive two-part \"Build Back Better\" infrastructure plan, Chuck Schumer, the Democrats' leader in the Senate, just announced that Democrats have united behind a $3.5 trillion \"infrastructure\" spending package, which they can now pass using special budget rules allowing them to circumvent the filibuster.\nIn a late-night announcement Tuesday, Schumer said the Budget Committee had reached an agreement to allot $3.5 trillion for a spending package that would complete President Biden’s infrastructure plan.\n\n \"The Budget Committee has come to an agreement,\" Sen. Schumer told reporters Tuesday night following a closed-door meeting with Democratic lawmakers.\n\nThe deal adds to the $600 billion package of infrastructure measures that Biden has struck with Republicans.\n\n \"You add that to that the $600 billion in a bipartisan plan and you get to $4.1 trillion, which is very, very close to what President Biden has asked us for,\" Schumer said. \"Every major program that President Biden has asked us for is funded in a robust way.\"\n\nThe package will include such \"infrastructure\" priorities like expanding Medicare, addressing climate change, expanding childcare (after the administration just approved a new $300 handout for couples with children)  and education. The Democrats have famously deemed all this \"human infrastructure\", which Republicans have vowed to reject.\nDemocrats will meet with Biden Wednesday, the majority leader said following the closed-door meeting.\n\n \"We are very proud of this plan. We know we have a long road to go. We're going to get this done for the sake of making average Americans' lives a whole lot better,\" Schumer said\n\nPreviously, Schumer has promised to hold votes on both pieces of legislation before the Senate breaks for its August recess, which amounts to a pretty aggressive timeline, especially since some Republicans might rethink their support for the earlier measure now that Democrats are pushing ahead with the bigger multi-trillion-dollar package.\nTo be clear, the bipartisan deal struck by Biden authorizes a total of $1.2 trillion in spending over eight years. Meanwhile, the budget resolution necessary to pass the Democratic-only bill will require some more maneuvering.\nSenate Democrats want to bring the bipartisan infrastructure bill to the floor as soon as next week, though negotiators have warned that is an ambitious pace. Democrats didn't say on Tuesday night when specifically they would be ready to take the budget resolution to the floor. To pass both the budget resolution and a subsequent $3 to $5-trillion infrastructure bill through the Senate Democrats will need total unity from all 50 of their members. Democrats declined to say on Tuesday night if they had unified support.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1331,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":145403560,"gmtCreate":1626234102150,"gmtModify":1633928759083,"author":{"id":"4089336447545430","authorId":"4089336447545430","name":"LimZhiHao","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3d51af908e2c45d717f209b100bedb4","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089336447545430","idStr":"4089336447545430"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/145403560","repostId":"1153057412","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153057412","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626232523,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1153057412?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-14 11:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion \"Human Infrastructure\" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153057412","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of Presid","content":"<p>Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of President Biden's massive two-part \"Build Back Better\" infrastructure plan, Chuck Schumer, the Democrats' leader in the Senate, just announced that Democrats have united behind a $3.5 trillion \"infrastructure\" spending package, which they can now pass using special budget rules allowing them to circumvent the filibuster.</p><p><blockquote>在拜登政府及其国会盟友泄露拜登总统由两部分组成的大规模“重建得更好”基础设施计划的第一个细节几个月后，参议院民主党领袖查克·舒默刚刚宣布，民主党已团结起来支持3.5万亿美元的“基础设施”支出计划，他们现在可以使用特殊预算规则通过该计划，使他们能够绕过阻挠。</blockquote></p><p> In a late-night announcement Tuesday, Schumer said the Budget Committee had reached an agreement to allot $3.5 trillion for a spending package that would complete President Biden’s infrastructure plan.</p><p><blockquote>舒默在周二深夜的一份声明中表示，预算委员会已达成协议，为一项支出计划拨款3.5万亿美元，以完成拜登总统的基础设施计划。</blockquote></p><p>   \"The Budget Committee has come to an agreement,\" Sen. Schumer told reporters Tuesday night following a closed-door meeting with Democratic lawmakers.  The deal adds to the $600 billion package of infrastructure measures that Biden has struck with Republicans.</p><p><blockquote>“预算委员会已经达成协议，”参议员舒默周二晚上在与民主党议员举行闭门会议后告诉记者。该协议是拜登与共和党达成的6000亿美元一揽子基础设施措施的补充。</blockquote></p><p>   \"You add that to that the $600 billion in a bipartisan plan and you get to $4.1 trillion, which is very, very close to what President Biden has asked us for,\" Schumer said. \"Every major program that President Biden has asked us for is funded in a robust way.\"  The package will include such \"infrastructure\" priorities like expanding Medicare, addressing climate change, expanding childcare (after the administration just approved a new $300 handout for couples with children)&nbsp; and education. The Democrats have famously deemed all this \"human infrastructure\", which Republicans have vowed to reject.</p><p><blockquote>舒默说：“再加上两党计划中的6000亿美元，就会达到4.1万亿美元，这非常非常接近拜登总统向我们提出的要求。”“拜登总统要求我们实施的每一个重大项目都得到了充足的资助。”该计划将包括“基础设施”优先事项，如扩大医疗保险、应对气候变化、扩大儿童保育（在政府刚刚批准为有孩子的夫妇提供300美元的新施舍后）和教育。众所周知，民主党人认为所有这些都是“人类基础设施”，而共和党人发誓要拒绝这一点。</blockquote></p><p> Democrats will meet with Biden Wednesday, the majority leader said following the closed-door meeting.</p><p><blockquote>多数党领袖在闭门会议后表示，民主党人将于周三会见拜登。</blockquote></p><p>   \"We are very proud of this plan. We know we have a long road to go. We're going to get this done for the sake of making average Americans' lives a whole lot better,\" Schumer said  Previously, Schumer has promised to hold votes on both pieces of legislation before the Senate breaks for its August recess, which amounts to a pretty aggressive timeline, especially since some Republicans might rethink their support for the earlier measure now that Democrats are pushing ahead with the bigger multi-trillion-dollar package.</p><p><blockquote>舒默表示：“我们对这项计划感到非常自豪。我们知道我们还有很长的路要走。为了让普通美国人的生活变得更好，我们将完成这项工作。”此前，舒默曾承诺在参议院八月份休会之前就这两项立法进行投票，这相当于一个相当激进的时间表，特别是因为现在民主党正在推进更大的数万亿美元一揽子计划，一些共和党人可能会重新考虑他们对早期措施的支持。</blockquote></p><p> To be clear, the bipartisan deal struck by Biden authorizes a total of $1.2 trillion in spending over eight years. Meanwhile, the budget resolution necessary to pass the Democratic-only bill will require some more maneuvering.</p><p><blockquote>需要明确的是，拜登达成的两党协议授权在八年内总共支出1.2万亿美元。与此同时，通过民主党专用法案所需的预算决议将需要更多的操作。</blockquote></p><p> Senate Democrats want to bring the bipartisan infrastructure&nbsp;bill to the floor as soon as next week, though negotiators have warned that is an ambitious pace. Democrats didn't say on Tuesday night when specifically they would be ready to take the budget resolution to the floor. To pass both the budget resolution and a&nbsp;subsequent&nbsp;$3 to $5-trillion infrastructure bill through the Senate Democrats will need total unity from all 50 of their members. Democrats declined to say on Tuesday night if they had unified support.</p><p><blockquote>参议院民主党人希望最早在下周将两党基础设施法案提交议会，尽管谈判代表警告说这是一个雄心勃勃的步伐。民主党人周二晚上没有透露他们何时准备好将预算决议提交议会。为了在参议院通过预算决议和随后的3至5万亿美元基础设施法案，民主党需要所有50名成员的完全团结。民主党人周二晚上拒绝透露他们是否得到了统一的支持。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Democrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion \"Human Infrastructure\" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDemocrats Strike Deal On $3.5 Trillion \"Human Infrastructure\" Package<blockquote>民主党就3.5万亿美元的“人力基础设施”计划达成协议</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-14 11:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of President Biden's massive two-part \"Build Back Better\" infrastructure plan, Chuck Schumer, the Democrats' leader in the Senate, just announced that Democrats have united behind a $3.5 trillion \"infrastructure\" spending package, which they can now pass using special budget rules allowing them to circumvent the filibuster.</p><p><blockquote>在拜登政府及其国会盟友泄露拜登总统由两部分组成的大规模“重建得更好”基础设施计划的第一个细节几个月后，参议院民主党领袖查克·舒默刚刚宣布，民主党已团结起来支持3.5万亿美元的“基础设施”支出计划，他们现在可以使用特殊预算规则通过该计划，使他们能够绕过阻挠。</blockquote></p><p> In a late-night announcement Tuesday, Schumer said the Budget Committee had reached an agreement to allot $3.5 trillion for a spending package that would complete President Biden’s infrastructure plan.</p><p><blockquote>舒默在周二深夜的一份声明中表示，预算委员会已达成协议，为一项支出计划拨款3.5万亿美元，以完成拜登总统的基础设施计划。</blockquote></p><p>   \"The Budget Committee has come to an agreement,\" Sen. Schumer told reporters Tuesday night following a closed-door meeting with Democratic lawmakers.  The deal adds to the $600 billion package of infrastructure measures that Biden has struck with Republicans.</p><p><blockquote>“预算委员会已经达成协议，”参议员舒默周二晚上在与民主党议员举行闭门会议后告诉记者。该协议是拜登与共和党达成的6000亿美元一揽子基础设施措施的补充。</blockquote></p><p>   \"You add that to that the $600 billion in a bipartisan plan and you get to $4.1 trillion, which is very, very close to what President Biden has asked us for,\" Schumer said. \"Every major program that President Biden has asked us for is funded in a robust way.\"  The package will include such \"infrastructure\" priorities like expanding Medicare, addressing climate change, expanding childcare (after the administration just approved a new $300 handout for couples with children)&nbsp; and education. The Democrats have famously deemed all this \"human infrastructure\", which Republicans have vowed to reject.</p><p><blockquote>舒默说：“再加上两党计划中的6000亿美元，就会达到4.1万亿美元，这非常非常接近拜登总统向我们提出的要求。”“拜登总统要求我们实施的每一个重大项目都得到了充足的资助。”该计划将包括“基础设施”优先事项，如扩大医疗保险、应对气候变化、扩大儿童保育（在政府刚刚批准为有孩子的夫妇提供300美元的新施舍后）和教育。众所周知，民主党人认为所有这些都是“人类基础设施”，而共和党人发誓要拒绝这一点。</blockquote></p><p> Democrats will meet with Biden Wednesday, the majority leader said following the closed-door meeting.</p><p><blockquote>多数党领袖在闭门会议后表示，民主党人将于周三会见拜登。</blockquote></p><p>   \"We are very proud of this plan. We know we have a long road to go. We're going to get this done for the sake of making average Americans' lives a whole lot better,\" Schumer said  Previously, Schumer has promised to hold votes on both pieces of legislation before the Senate breaks for its August recess, which amounts to a pretty aggressive timeline, especially since some Republicans might rethink their support for the earlier measure now that Democrats are pushing ahead with the bigger multi-trillion-dollar package.</p><p><blockquote>舒默表示：“我们对这项计划感到非常自豪。我们知道我们还有很长的路要走。为了让普通美国人的生活变得更好，我们将完成这项工作。”此前，舒默曾承诺在参议院八月份休会之前就这两项立法进行投票，这相当于一个相当激进的时间表，特别是因为现在民主党正在推进更大的数万亿美元一揽子计划，一些共和党人可能会重新考虑他们对早期措施的支持。</blockquote></p><p> To be clear, the bipartisan deal struck by Biden authorizes a total of $1.2 trillion in spending over eight years. Meanwhile, the budget resolution necessary to pass the Democratic-only bill will require some more maneuvering.</p><p><blockquote>需要明确的是，拜登达成的两党协议授权在八年内总共支出1.2万亿美元。与此同时，通过民主党专用法案所需的预算决议将需要更多的操作。</blockquote></p><p> Senate Democrats want to bring the bipartisan infrastructure&nbsp;bill to the floor as soon as next week, though negotiators have warned that is an ambitious pace. Democrats didn't say on Tuesday night when specifically they would be ready to take the budget resolution to the floor. To pass both the budget resolution and a&nbsp;subsequent&nbsp;$3 to $5-trillion infrastructure bill through the Senate Democrats will need total unity from all 50 of their members. Democrats declined to say on Tuesday night if they had unified support.</p><p><blockquote>参议院民主党人希望最早在下周将两党基础设施法案提交议会，尽管谈判代表警告说这是一个雄心勃勃的步伐。民主党人周二晚上没有透露他们何时准备好将预算决议提交议会。为了在参议院通过预算决议和随后的3至5万亿美元基础设施法案，民主党需要所有50名成员的完全团结。民主党人周二晚上拒绝透露他们是否得到了统一的支持。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-strike-deal-35-trillion-human-infrastructure-package?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-strike-deal-35-trillion-human-infrastructure-package?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153057412","content_text":"Months after the Biden Administration and its Congressional alliesleaked the first details of President Biden's massive two-part \"Build Back Better\" infrastructure plan, Chuck Schumer, the Democrats' leader in the Senate, just announced that Democrats have united behind a $3.5 trillion \"infrastructure\" spending package, which they can now pass using special budget rules allowing them to circumvent the filibuster.\nIn a late-night announcement Tuesday, Schumer said the Budget Committee had reached an agreement to allot $3.5 trillion for a spending package that would complete President Biden’s infrastructure plan.\n\n \"The Budget Committee has come to an agreement,\" Sen. Schumer told reporters Tuesday night following a closed-door meeting with Democratic lawmakers.\n\nThe deal adds to the $600 billion package of infrastructure measures that Biden has struck with Republicans.\n\n \"You add that to that the $600 billion in a bipartisan plan and you get to $4.1 trillion, which is very, very close to what President Biden has asked us for,\" Schumer said. \"Every major program that President Biden has asked us for is funded in a robust way.\"\n\nThe package will include such \"infrastructure\" priorities like expanding Medicare, addressing climate change, expanding childcare (after the administration just approved a new $300 handout for couples with children)  and education. The Democrats have famously deemed all this \"human infrastructure\", which Republicans have vowed to reject.\nDemocrats will meet with Biden Wednesday, the majority leader said following the closed-door meeting.\n\n \"We are very proud of this plan. We know we have a long road to go. We're going to get this done for the sake of making average Americans' lives a whole lot better,\" Schumer said\n\nPreviously, Schumer has promised to hold votes on both pieces of legislation before the Senate breaks for its August recess, which amounts to a pretty aggressive timeline, especially since some Republicans might rethink their support for the earlier measure now that Democrats are pushing ahead with the bigger multi-trillion-dollar package.\nTo be clear, the bipartisan deal struck by Biden authorizes a total of $1.2 trillion in spending over eight years. Meanwhile, the budget resolution necessary to pass the Democratic-only bill will require some more maneuvering.\nSenate Democrats want to bring the bipartisan infrastructure bill to the floor as soon as next week, though negotiators have warned that is an ambitious pace. Democrats didn't say on Tuesday night when specifically they would be ready to take the budget resolution to the floor. To pass both the budget resolution and a subsequent $3 to $5-trillion infrastructure bill through the Senate Democrats will need total unity from all 50 of their members. Democrats declined to say on Tuesday night if they had unified support.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":797,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}