Lame_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

WilsonSie
2021-07-29

Lame

China's Didi denies 'rumour' that it could go private

Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc said on Thursday that a "rumour" that it could go private

China's Didi denies 'rumour' that it could go private

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":808137874,"tweetId":"808137874","gmtCreate":1627564245198,"gmtModify":1633763776161,"author":{"id":3574908538071274,"idStr":"3574908538071274","authorId":3574908538071274,"authorIdStr":"3574908538071274","name":"WilsonSie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":0,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Lame</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Lame</body></html>","text":"Lame","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/808137874","repostId":1108176649,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1108176649","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627551538,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108176649?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-29 17:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"China's Didi denies 'rumour' that it could go private","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108176649","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc said on Thursday that a \"rumour\" that it could go private","content":"Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc said on Thursday that a \"rumour\" that it could go private was not true.The company issued its statement shortly after a report in the Wall Street Journal said that Didi was considering going private to placate Chinese authorities and compensate investor losses following its recent initial public offering.\nDidi Global shares narrowed to 17% after rising more than 40% in premarket trading.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/100d707799c7a8b795f464a07dc64ae2\" tg-width=\"903\" tg-height=\"642\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">\nRide-hailing giant&nbsp;Didi Global&nbsp;Inc.&nbsp;is considering going private in order to placate authorities in China and compensate investors for losses incurred since the company listed in the U.S. in late June, according to people familiar with the matter.\nThe Beijing-headquartered company has been in discussions with bankers, regulators and key investors about how it could resolve some of the problems that emerged after Didi listed on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, the people said. A take-private deal that would involve a tender offer for its publicly traded shares is one of the preliminary options being considered, they added.\nDidi raised about $4.4 billion in its initial public offering after selling American depositary shares at $14 apiece, in the biggest stock sale by a Chinese company since the 2014 blockbuster listing of&nbsp;Alibaba Group Holding&nbsp;Ltd.\nIts shares briefly topped $18 in their first days of trading, before the Cyberspace Administration of China stunned investors and the company on July 2 by&nbsp;launching a data-security probe&nbsp;into Didi and blocking its China business from adding new users. Two days later, the cybersecurity regulator told app-store operators to&nbsp;take down&nbsp;the company’s popular Chinese mobile app.\nThe crackdown worsened on July 9, when 25 more Didi apps—including ones used by drivers—were ordered to be removed from app stores, potentially crippling the company’s operations. China also said in early July that it would&nbsp;tighten rules&nbsp;for companies selling shares abroad, signaling its displeasure with recent listings by Didi and others.\nThe unexpected moves caused Didi’s shares to plunge below their IPO price. They closed at $8.87 on Wednesday, giving the company a market capitalization of about $43 billion, according to FactSet.\nNumerous U.S. law firms that represent Didi shareholders who lost money have filed securities class-action lawsuits against the company, its IPO underwriters and board. The suits in many cases have alleged that false and misleading statements were made before the company’s IPO, which was led by units of&nbsp;Goldman Sachs Group&nbsp;Inc.,Morgan Stanley&nbsp;and&nbsp;JPMorgan Chase&amp; Co.\nWeeks before Didi went public, China’s security watchdog suggested to the company that it&nbsp;delay its listing plans&nbsp;and conduct a thorough examination of its network security, The Wall Street Journal reported. Despite the regulator’s suggestion—which the company never disclosed—Didi went ahead with its listing plans.\nDidi started contemplating the go-private plan around mid-July after the regulatory actions escalated, according to people familiar with the matter.\nA take-private offer could be funded partly or predominantly with money that Didi raised from U.S. and global investors in the IPO. The price that the company would offer to investors has yet to be determined, but it could be around or above the $14-per-share IPO price, one of the people said.\nDidi has asked its major underwriters to gauge investors’ views regarding a privatization plan, as well as the pricing range that they would accept, the people said.\nThe plan is still under deliberation and would need approval from Didi’s board and major pre-IPO investors including&nbsp;SoftBank Group&nbsp;Corp.’s&nbsp;Vision Fund.\nCAC, the cybersecurity watchdog, is supportive of the privatization plan in principle, according to one of the people. SoftBank is unlikely to help fund a deal, the person said. The Japanese conglomerate’s first Vision Fund previously poured about $12 billion into Didi and holds a 20% stake in the company.\nRepresentatives of Didi, SoftBank, the CAC and the banks didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.\nDidi is also considering bringing in state-backed investors who could help finance the deal and help guide the company as it tries to remedy its data-security issues, according to people familiar with the matter.\nThe cybersecurity watchdog said earlier this month that there were serious problems involving the illegal collection of personal data by the company, and instructed Didi Chuxing, its China business, to address the issues to “ensure the safety of the personal information of users.”\nDidi said at the time that it “sincerely accepts and firmly obeys the requirements made by relevant authorities.”","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China's Didi denies 'rumour' that it could go private</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina's Didi denies 'rumour' that it could go private\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\nTiger Newspress \n2021-07-29 17:38\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\nChinese ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc said on Thursday that a \"rumour\" that it could go private was not true.The company issued its statement shortly after a report in the Wall Street Journal said that Didi was considering going private to placate Chinese authorities and compensate investor losses following its recent initial public offering.\nDidi Global shares narrowed to 17% after rising more than 40% in premarket trading.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/100d707799c7a8b795f464a07dc64ae2\" tg-width=\"903\" tg-height=\"642\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">\nRide-hailing giant&nbsp;Didi Global&nbsp;Inc.&nbsp;is considering going private in order to placate authorities in China and compensate investors for losses incurred since the company listed in the U.S. in late June, according to people familiar with the matter.\nThe Beijing-headquartered company has been in discussions with bankers, regulators and key investors about how it could resolve some of the problems that emerged after Didi listed on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, the people said. A take-private deal that would involve a tender offer for its publicly traded shares is one of the preliminary options being considered, they added.\nDidi raised about $4.4 billion in its initial public offering after selling American depositary shares at $14 apiece, in the biggest stock sale by a Chinese company since the 2014 blockbuster listing of&nbsp;Alibaba Group Holding&nbsp;Ltd.\nIts shares briefly topped $18 in their first days of trading, before the Cyberspace Administration of China stunned investors and the company on July 2 by&nbsp;launching a data-security probe&nbsp;into Didi and blocking its China business from adding new users. Two days later, the cybersecurity regulator told app-store operators to&nbsp;take down&nbsp;the company’s popular Chinese mobile app.\nThe crackdown worsened on July 9, when 25 more Didi apps—including ones used by drivers—were ordered to be removed from app stores, potentially crippling the company’s operations. China also said in early July that it would&nbsp;tighten rules&nbsp;for companies selling shares abroad, signaling its displeasure with recent listings by Didi and others.\nThe unexpected moves caused Didi’s shares to plunge below their IPO price. They closed at $8.87 on Wednesday, giving the company a market capitalization of about $43 billion, according to FactSet.\nNumerous U.S. law firms that represent Didi shareholders who lost money have filed securities class-action lawsuits against the company, its IPO underwriters and board. The suits in many cases have alleged that false and misleading statements were made before the company’s IPO, which was led by units of&nbsp;Goldman Sachs Group&nbsp;Inc.,Morgan Stanley&nbsp;and&nbsp;JPMorgan Chase&amp; Co.\nWeeks before Didi went public, China’s security watchdog suggested to the company that it&nbsp;delay its listing plans&nbsp;and conduct a thorough examination of its network security, The Wall Street Journal reported. Despite the regulator’s suggestion—which the company never disclosed—Didi went ahead with its listing plans.\nDidi started contemplating the go-private plan around mid-July after the regulatory actions escalated, according to people familiar with the matter.\nA take-private offer could be funded partly or predominantly with money that Didi raised from U.S. and global investors in the IPO. The price that the company would offer to investors has yet to be determined, but it could be around or above the $14-per-share IPO price, one of the people said.\nDidi has asked its major underwriters to gauge investors’ views regarding a privatization plan, as well as the pricing range that they would accept, the people said.\nThe plan is still under deliberation and would need approval from Didi’s board and major pre-IPO investors including&nbsp;SoftBank Group&nbsp;Corp.’s&nbsp;Vision Fund.\nCAC, the cybersecurity watchdog, is supportive of the privatization plan in principle, according to one of the people. SoftBank is unlikely to help fund a deal, the person said. The Japanese conglomerate’s first Vision Fund previously poured about $12 billion into Didi and holds a 20% stake in the company.\nRepresentatives of Didi, SoftBank, the CAC and the banks didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.\nDidi is also considering bringing in state-backed investors who could help finance the deal and help guide the company as it tries to remedy its data-security issues, according to people familiar with the matter.\nThe cybersecurity watchdog said earlier this month that there were serious problems involving the illegal collection of personal data by the company, and instructed Didi Chuxing, its China business, to address the issues to “ensure the safety of the personal information of users.”\nDidi said at the time that it “sincerely accepts and firmly obeys the requirements made by relevant authorities.”\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108176649","content_text":"Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc said on Thursday that a \"rumour\" that it could go private was not true.The company issued its statement shortly after a report in the Wall Street Journal said that Didi was considering going private to placate Chinese authorities and compensate investor losses following its recent initial public offering.\nDidi Global shares narrowed to 17% after rising more than 40% in premarket trading.\n\nRide-hailing giant Didi Global Inc. is considering going private in order to placate authorities in China and compensate investors for losses incurred since the company listed in the U.S. in late June, according to people familiar with the matter.\nThe Beijing-headquartered company has been in discussions with bankers, regulators and key investors about how it could resolve some of the problems that emerged after Didi listed on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, the people said. A take-private deal that would involve a tender offer for its publicly traded shares is one of the preliminary options being considered, they added.\nDidi raised about $4.4 billion in its initial public offering after selling American depositary shares at $14 apiece, in the biggest stock sale by a Chinese company since the 2014 blockbuster listing of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.\nIts shares briefly topped $18 in their first days of trading, before the Cyberspace Administration of China stunned investors and the company on July 2 by launching a data-security probe into Didi and blocking its China business from adding new users. Two days later, the cybersecurity regulator told app-store operators to take down the company’s popular Chinese mobile app.\nThe crackdown worsened on July 9, when 25 more Didi apps—including ones used by drivers—were ordered to be removed from app stores, potentially crippling the company’s operations. China also said in early July that it would tighten rules for companies selling shares abroad, signaling its displeasure with recent listings by Didi and others.\nThe unexpected moves caused Didi’s shares to plunge below their IPO price. They closed at $8.87 on Wednesday, giving the company a market capitalization of about $43 billion, according to FactSet.\nNumerous U.S. law firms that represent Didi shareholders who lost money have filed securities class-action lawsuits against the company, its IPO underwriters and board. The suits in many cases have alleged that false and misleading statements were made before the company’s IPO, which was led by units of Goldman Sachs Group Inc.,Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase& Co.\nWeeks before Didi went public, China’s security watchdog suggested to the company that it delay its listing plans and conduct a thorough examination of its network security, The Wall Street Journal reported. Despite the regulator’s suggestion—which the company never disclosed—Didi went ahead with its listing plans.\nDidi started contemplating the go-private plan around mid-July after the regulatory actions escalated, according to people familiar with the matter.\nA take-private offer could be funded partly or predominantly with money that Didi raised from U.S. and global investors in the IPO. The price that the company would offer to investors has yet to be determined, but it could be around or above the $14-per-share IPO price, one of the people said.\nDidi has asked its major underwriters to gauge investors’ views regarding a privatization plan, as well as the pricing range that they would accept, the people said.\nThe plan is still under deliberation and would need approval from Didi’s board and major pre-IPO investors including SoftBank Group Corp.’s Vision Fund.\nCAC, the cybersecurity watchdog, is supportive of the privatization plan in principle, according to one of the people. SoftBank is unlikely to help fund a deal, the person said. The Japanese conglomerate’s first Vision Fund previously poured about $12 billion into Didi and holds a 20% stake in the company.\nRepresentatives of Didi, SoftBank, the CAC and the banks didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.\nDidi is also considering bringing in state-backed investors who could help finance the deal and help guide the company as it tries to remedy its data-security issues, according to people familiar with the matter.\nThe cybersecurity watchdog said earlier this month that there were serious problems involving the illegal collection of personal data by the company, and instructed Didi Chuxing, its China business, to address the issues to “ensure the safety of the personal information of users.”\nDidi said at the time that it “sincerely accepts and firmly obeys the requirements made by relevant authorities.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DIDI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":156,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":4,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}