For a chan_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

NBAl
2021-11-05

For a change I agree.. Starbucks! but they need to evolve if they want to survive

Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买：迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>

Both have strong brands, but one gets the nod.

Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买：迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":842072401,"tweetId":"842072401","gmtCreate":1636122794708,"gmtModify":1636122794836,"author":{"id":3582610336531043,"idStr":"3582610336531043","authorId":3582610336531043,"authorIdStr":"3582610336531043","name":"NBAl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de8d0324ec977b11182ed837042b62e1","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":5,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>For a change I agree.. Starbucks! but they need to evolve if they want to survive&nbsp;</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>For a change I agree.. Starbucks! but they need to evolve if they want to survive&nbsp;</body></html>","text":"For a change I agree.. Starbucks! but they need to evolve if they want to survive","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842072401","repostId":1156284404,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156284404","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636121042,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1156284404?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 22:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买：迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156284404","media":"Motley Fool ","summary":"Both have strong brands, but one gets the nod.","content":"It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.<blockquote>在两家优质公司之间总是很难做出选择。理想情况下，你可能想两者都买。然而，投资往往归结为把你的血汗钱放在哪里。</blockquote> That's the case with&nbsp;Walt Disney&nbsp;and&nbsp;Starbucks. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;has risen by 24% during that time.<blockquote>情况就是这样迪斯尼和星巴克两只股票都经历了充满挑战的2021年。迪士尼股价下跌6%，星巴克股价下跌5%。这是作为标普500在此期间上涨了24%。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92d7cd6a38784299fa1cce99ae01a4cd\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.<blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote> However, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?<blockquote>然而，两者都为投资者提供了坚实的长期增长前景。问题是：目前哪一项是更好的投资？</blockquote> Starbucks<blockquote>星巴克</blockquote> Investors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from&nbsp;higher costs&nbsp;that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.<blockquote>投资者显然不喜欢星巴克最新的季度收益报告。10月底发布后，该股下跌6%，至106美元左右。这个问题源于成本上升，这可能会继续影响近期盈利能力。</blockquote> In the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under&nbsp;U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.<blockquote>最近一个季度，星巴克在美国的营业利润率。公认会计原则(GAAP)增长了一倍多，达到18.2%。但管理层预计明年的利润率为17%，这主要是由于工资上涨。虽然这低于18%至19%的长期目标，但我相信这将是暂时的。</blockquote> That's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.<blockquote>这是因为星巴克继续保持强劲的销售增长。这将有助于公司提高价格并利用费用。</blockquote> Starbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,<blockquote>受新餐厅开业和同店销售额增长17%的推动，星巴克季度营收增长31%至81亿美元。管理层预计2022财年的销售额将实现高个位数百分比增长，并将开设2,000家餐厅，其中大部分在美国境外。预计这些将带来325亿至330亿美元的收入，</blockquote> In short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.<blockquote>简而言之，对星巴克产品的需求在疫情期间因商店关闭而暂停，但仍然强劲。</blockquote> Walt Disney<blockquote>迪斯尼</blockquote> Disney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about&nbsp;slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.<blockquote>由于担心其流媒体服务Disney+增长放缓，迪士尼股价今年下跌。由于它在疫情期间突飞猛进，我并不担心。</blockquote> After all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.<blockquote>毕竟，截至2021年7月初，Disney+的付费用户为1.16亿，而4月份为1.036亿。这也是一年前5750万的两倍多。</blockquote> While it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.<blockquote>虽然Disney+可能没有过去的超音速增长，但它仍在以不错的速度增加订户。更重要的是，迪士尼不仅仅是一个流媒体服务。其庞大的媒体帝国包括公园、电影、几个电视网络和零售店。</blockquote> This helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.<blockquote>这有助于公司取得强劲的业绩，即使业务的一部分放缓。例如，今年帮助其ESPN网络的体育直播回归，主题公园重新开放。其季度收入同比增长45%，达到170亿美元。</blockquote> With popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.<blockquote>凭借受欢迎的媒体资产，如漫威角色和电影的稳定，迪士尼的未来看起来一片光明。这是因为它拥有高度认可和备受推崇的品牌，这些品牌已经证明了它们的持久力。管理层加强了其地位，包括几年前收购了二十一世纪福克斯公司，该公司增加了电视网络、漫威角色，并提供了流媒体服务Hulu的控股权。</blockquote> After examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.<blockquote>考察了两家公司后，两家公司都有吸引很多人的强大品牌。对我来说，优势在于星巴克，因为它自2010年以来增加了股息，包括在大流行期间。很高兴收到收入，这是管理层和董事会对未来有信心的积极迹象。</blockquote> Unfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.<blockquote>不幸的是，迪士尼去年暂停了股息。虽然考虑到疫情造成的不确定性，这当然是可以理解的，但这确实给星巴克带来了帮助，星巴克认为增加支付是合适的。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买：迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买：迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMotley Fool 2021-11-05 22:04\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nIt is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.<blockquote>在两家优质公司之间总是很难做出选择。理想情况下，你可能想两者都买。然而，投资往往归结为把你的血汗钱放在哪里。</blockquote> That's the case with&nbsp;Walt Disney&nbsp;and&nbsp;Starbucks. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;has risen by 24% during that time.<blockquote>情况就是这样迪斯尼和星巴克两只股票都经历了充满挑战的2021年。迪士尼股价下跌6%，星巴克股价下跌5%。这是作为标普500在此期间上涨了24%。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92d7cd6a38784299fa1cce99ae01a4cd\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.<blockquote>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</blockquote> However, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?<blockquote>然而，两者都为投资者提供了坚实的长期增长前景。问题是：目前哪一项是更好的投资？</blockquote> Starbucks<blockquote>星巴克</blockquote> Investors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from&nbsp;higher costs&nbsp;that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.<blockquote>投资者显然不喜欢星巴克最新的季度收益报告。10月底发布后，该股下跌6%，至106美元左右。这个问题源于成本上升，这可能会继续影响近期盈利能力。</blockquote> In the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under&nbsp;U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.<blockquote>最近一个季度，星巴克在美国的营业利润率。公认会计原则(GAAP)增长了一倍多，达到18.2%。但管理层预计明年的利润率为17%，这主要是由于工资上涨。虽然这低于18%至19%的长期目标，但我相信这将是暂时的。</blockquote> That's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.<blockquote>这是因为星巴克继续保持强劲的销售增长。这将有助于公司提高价格并利用费用。</blockquote> Starbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,<blockquote>受新餐厅开业和同店销售额增长17%的推动，星巴克季度营收增长31%至81亿美元。管理层预计2022财年的销售额将实现高个位数百分比增长，并将开设2,000家餐厅，其中大部分在美国境外。预计这些将带来325亿至330亿美元的收入，</blockquote> In short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.<blockquote>简而言之，对星巴克产品的需求在疫情期间因商店关闭而暂停，但仍然强劲。</blockquote> Walt Disney<blockquote>迪斯尼</blockquote> Disney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about&nbsp;slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.<blockquote>由于担心其流媒体服务Disney+增长放缓，迪士尼股价今年下跌。由于它在疫情期间突飞猛进，我并不担心。</blockquote> After all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.<blockquote>毕竟，截至2021年7月初，Disney+的付费用户为1.16亿，而4月份为1.036亿。这也是一年前5750万的两倍多。</blockquote> While it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.<blockquote>虽然Disney+可能没有过去的超音速增长，但它仍在以不错的速度增加订户。更重要的是，迪士尼不仅仅是一个流媒体服务。其庞大的媒体帝国包括公园、电影、几个电视网络和零售店。</blockquote> This helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.<blockquote>这有助于公司取得强劲的业绩，即使业务的一部分放缓。例如，今年帮助其ESPN网络的体育直播回归，主题公园重新开放。其季度收入同比增长45%，达到170亿美元。</blockquote> With popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.<blockquote>凭借受欢迎的媒体资产，如漫威角色和电影的稳定，迪士尼的未来看起来一片光明。这是因为它拥有高度认可和备受推崇的品牌，这些品牌已经证明了它们的持久力。管理层加强了其地位，包括几年前收购了二十一世纪福克斯公司，该公司增加了电视网络、漫威角色，并提供了流媒体服务Hulu的控股权。</blockquote> After examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.<blockquote>考察了两家公司后，两家公司都有吸引很多人的强大品牌。对我来说，优势在于星巴克，因为它自2010年以来增加了股息，包括在大流行期间。很高兴收到收入，这是管理层和董事会对未来有信心的积极迹象。</blockquote> Unfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.<blockquote>不幸的是，迪士尼去年暂停了股息。虽然考虑到疫情造成的不确定性，这当然是可以理解的，但这确实给星巴克带来了帮助，星巴克认为增加支付是合适的。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/better-buy-disney-vs-starbucks/\">Motley Fool </a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","SBUX":"星巴克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/better-buy-disney-vs-starbucks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156284404","content_text":"It is always difficult to choose between two high-quality companies. Ideally, you might like to purchase both. Yet, frequently investing comes down to where to put your hard-earned money.\nThat's the case with Walt Disney and Starbucks. Both stocks have had a challenging 2021. Disney's share price is down 6%, while Starbucks' stock has dropped by 5%. This comes as the S&P 500 has risen by 24% during that time.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nHowever, both offer investors solid long-term growth prospects. The question is: Which one is the better investment right now?\nStarbucks\nInvestors clearly didn't like Starbucks' latest quarterly earnings report. Following the late-October release, they sent the stock down by 6% to about $106. The issue stemmed from higher costs that will likely continue weighing on near-term profitability.\nIn the latest quarter, Starbucks' operating margin under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP) more than doubled to 18.2%. But for next year, management expects a 17% margin, largely due to higher wages. While this is below its 18% to 19% long-term target, I believe this will prove temporary.\nThat's because Starbucks continues to post strong sales growth. That will help the company increase prices and leverage expenses.\nStarbucks' quarterly revenue rose by 31% to $8.1 billion, driven by new restaurant openings and a 17% increase in same-store sales. For fiscal 2022, management expects a high single-digit percentage increase in comps and to open 2,000 restaurants, mostly outside of the U.S. It anticipates these will lead to revenue of $32.5 billion to $33 billion,\nIn short, demand for Starbucks' products, which took a pause during the pandemic due to store closures, remains strong.\nWalt Disney\nDisney's shares have fallen this year due to concerns about slowing growth at Disney+, its streaming service. As it grew by leaps and bounds during the pandemic, I'm not concerned.\nAfter all, Disney+ had 116 million paid subscribers at the start of July 2021, compared to 103.6 million in April. This is also more than double the 57.5 million from a year ago.\nWhile it may not have the supersonic growth of the past, Disney+ is still adding subscribers at a nice pace. What's more, Disney is far more than a streaming service. Its vast media empire includes parks, movies, several television networks, and retail stores.\nThis helps the company produce strong results, even if one part of the business slows. For instance, this year saw the return of live sports that helped its ESPN network, and theme parks reopened. Its quarterly revenue grew by 45% to $17 billion year over year.\nWith popular media properties, such as a stable of Marvel characters and movies, the future looks bright for Disney. That's because it has highly recognized and well-regarded brands that have proven their staying power. Management has strengthened its position, including buying Twenty-First Century Fox a couple of years ago, which added television networks, Marvel characters, and provided a controlling interest in the streaming service Hulu.\nAfter examining both companies, both have strong brands that attract a lot of people. For me, the edge goes to Starbucks, since it has increased dividends since 2010, including during the pandemic. It's nice to receive the income, and it's a positive sign that management and the board of directors have confidence in the future.\nUnfortunately, Disney suspended its dividend last year. While that's certainly understandable given the uncertainty created by the pandemic, it does give a leg up to Starbucks, which saw fit to increase payments.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SBUX":0.9,"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2894,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":66,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}

Better Buy: Disney vs. Starbucks<blockquote>更值得购买：迪士尼与星巴克</blockquote>

评论（1）

热议股票