Oooo_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

fatfrog
2021-10-19

Oooo

Fun facts from the U.S. SEC report on January's GameStop saga

(Reuters) - The U.S. securities regulator released its long-awaited post-mortem into January's GameS

Fun facts from the U.S. SEC report on January's GameStop saga

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":850651506,"tweetId":"850651506","gmtCreate":1634598401990,"gmtModify":1634598402183,"author":{"id":3576002212190826,"idStr":"3576002212190826","authorId":3576002212190826,"authorIdStr":"3576002212190826","name":"fatfrog","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0e01d644d81db4190669298caebac0a","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":6,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Oooo</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Oooo</body></html>","text":"Oooo","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850651506","repostId":2176207481,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2176207481","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1634598288,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2176207481?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 07:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fun facts from the U.S. SEC report on January's GameStop saga","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2176207481","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - The U.S. securities regulator released its long-awaited post-mortem into January's GameS","content":"(Reuters) - The U.S. securities regulator released its long-awaited post-mortem into January's GameStop saga, in which retail traders banded together on social media and piled in to GameStop and other \"meme\" stocks in an attempt to punish hedge funds that had bet against the company, sending its shares soaring.\nWhile the episode was explored in some detail during a congressional hearing&nbsp;earlier this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission report, published on Monday, offers some new details on what went down. Here are some takeaways:\n880,000 NEW ACCOUNTS STARTED TRADING GAMESTOP IN JANUARY\n\"GameStop had already started to receive attention on Reddit in 2019, including in discussions about short squeezes. That attention grew throughout 2020,\" the SEC said.\n\"Price increases, trading interest, and social media interest all accelerated in 2021.\"\nBy Jan. 27, the number of unique accounts trading GameStop on a given day had reached 900,000 compared with 10,000 at the beginning of the month, the SEC said.\nINSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ALSO DROVE THE RALLY\nIn addition to retail investors, institutional investors, including several hedge funds, also purchased shares of GameStop Corp.\nSome of those purchases may have been partly driven by hedge funds that had betted against GameStop, trying to cover their positions, and some of those funds made bad losses.\nIn contrast, some funds that were long GameStop cashed in.\n\"Some investors that had been invested in the target stocks prior to the market events benefited unexpectedly from the price rises, while others, including quantitative and high-frequency hedge funds, joined the market rally to trade profitably,\" the SEC wrote.\nNO 'GAMMA SQUEEZE'\nOne theory for GameStop's meteoric rise was a so-called gamma squeeze, which happens when market makers purchase a stock to hedge the risk created by writing call options on that stock. That, in turn, puts even more upward pressure on the stock price.\nThe SEC did find that GameStop options trading volume by retail investors increased substantially, but that was mostly driven by an increase in the buying of put, rather than call, options. The data also showed that market-makers were buying, rather than writing, call options.\n\"These observations by themselves are not consistent with a gamma squeeze,\" the SEC wrote.\nNO NAKED SHORTING\nThe unusually large amount of short selling in GameStop sparked speculation of “naked” shorting - selling shares without arranging to borrow the underlying security.\nWhen a naked short sale occurs, the seller fails to deliver the securities to the buyer. \"Based on the staff's review of the available data, (GameStop) did not experience persistent fails to deliver,\" the SEC said.\nIT WASN'T ALL ABOUT GAMESTOP\nBy early 2021, individual investors were increasingly downloading broker-dealer apps and more than 100 stocks experienced large price moves or increased trading volume that significantly exceeded the broader market, the SEC said.\nFor example, single-day price changes on Jan. 27 from the closing prices on Jan. 26 for KOSS Corporation (480.0%), AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc (301.2%), Naked Brand Group (252.3%) and Express Inc (214.1%) were larger than any single-day GameStop price change, according to the SEC.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fun facts from the U.S. SEC report on January's GameStop saga</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFun facts from the U.S. SEC report on January's GameStop saga\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\nReuters \n2021-10-19 07:04\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n(Reuters) - The U.S. securities regulator released its long-awaited post-mortem into January's GameStop saga, in which retail traders banded together on social media and piled in to GameStop and other \"meme\" stocks in an attempt to punish hedge funds that had bet against the company, sending its shares soaring.\nWhile the episode was explored in some detail during a congressional hearing&nbsp;earlier this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission report, published on Monday, offers some new details on what went down. Here are some takeaways:\n880,000 NEW ACCOUNTS STARTED TRADING GAMESTOP IN JANUARY\n\"GameStop had already started to receive attention on Reddit in 2019, including in discussions about short squeezes. That attention grew throughout 2020,\" the SEC said.\n\"Price increases, trading interest, and social media interest all accelerated in 2021.\"\nBy Jan. 27, the number of unique accounts trading GameStop on a given day had reached 900,000 compared with 10,000 at the beginning of the month, the SEC said.\nINSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ALSO DROVE THE RALLY\nIn addition to retail investors, institutional investors, including several hedge funds, also purchased shares of GameStop Corp.\nSome of those purchases may have been partly driven by hedge funds that had betted against GameStop, trying to cover their positions, and some of those funds made bad losses.\nIn contrast, some funds that were long GameStop cashed in.\n\"Some investors that had been invested in the target stocks prior to the market events benefited unexpectedly from the price rises, while others, including quantitative and high-frequency hedge funds, joined the market rally to trade profitably,\" the SEC wrote.\nNO 'GAMMA SQUEEZE'\nOne theory for GameStop's meteoric rise was a so-called gamma squeeze, which happens when market makers purchase a stock to hedge the risk created by writing call options on that stock. That, in turn, puts even more upward pressure on the stock price.\nThe SEC did find that GameStop options trading volume by retail investors increased substantially, but that was mostly driven by an increase in the buying of put, rather than call, options. The data also showed that market-makers were buying, rather than writing, call options.\n\"These observations by themselves are not consistent with a gamma squeeze,\" the SEC wrote.\nNO NAKED SHORTING\nThe unusually large amount of short selling in GameStop sparked speculation of “naked” shorting - selling shares without arranging to borrow the underlying security.\nWhen a naked short sale occurs, the seller fails to deliver the securities to the buyer. \"Based on the staff's review of the available data, (GameStop) did not experience persistent fails to deliver,\" the SEC said.\nIT WASN'T ALL ABOUT GAMESTOP\nBy early 2021, individual investors were increasingly downloading broker-dealer apps and more than 100 stocks experienced large price moves or increased trading volume that significantly exceeded the broader market, the SEC said.\nFor example, single-day price changes on Jan. 27 from the closing prices on Jan. 26 for KOSS Corporation (480.0%), AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc (301.2%), Naked Brand Group (252.3%) and Express Inc (214.1%) were larger than any single-day GameStop price change, according to the SEC.\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2176207481","content_text":"(Reuters) - The U.S. securities regulator released its long-awaited post-mortem into January's GameStop saga, in which retail traders banded together on social media and piled in to GameStop and other \"meme\" stocks in an attempt to punish hedge funds that had bet against the company, sending its shares soaring.\nWhile the episode was explored in some detail during a congressional hearing earlier this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission report, published on Monday, offers some new details on what went down. Here are some takeaways:\n880,000 NEW ACCOUNTS STARTED TRADING GAMESTOP IN JANUARY\n\"GameStop had already started to receive attention on Reddit in 2019, including in discussions about short squeezes. That attention grew throughout 2020,\" the SEC said.\n\"Price increases, trading interest, and social media interest all accelerated in 2021.\"\nBy Jan. 27, the number of unique accounts trading GameStop on a given day had reached 900,000 compared with 10,000 at the beginning of the month, the SEC said.\nINSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ALSO DROVE THE RALLY\nIn addition to retail investors, institutional investors, including several hedge funds, also purchased shares of GameStop Corp.\nSome of those purchases may have been partly driven by hedge funds that had betted against GameStop, trying to cover their positions, and some of those funds made bad losses.\nIn contrast, some funds that were long GameStop cashed in.\n\"Some investors that had been invested in the target stocks prior to the market events benefited unexpectedly from the price rises, while others, including quantitative and high-frequency hedge funds, joined the market rally to trade profitably,\" the SEC wrote.\nNO 'GAMMA SQUEEZE'\nOne theory for GameStop's meteoric rise was a so-called gamma squeeze, which happens when market makers purchase a stock to hedge the risk created by writing call options on that stock. That, in turn, puts even more upward pressure on the stock price.\nThe SEC did find that GameStop options trading volume by retail investors increased substantially, but that was mostly driven by an increase in the buying of put, rather than call, options. The data also showed that market-makers were buying, rather than writing, call options.\n\"These observations by themselves are not consistent with a gamma squeeze,\" the SEC wrote.\nNO NAKED SHORTING\nThe unusually large amount of short selling in GameStop sparked speculation of “naked” shorting - selling shares without arranging to borrow the underlying security.\nWhen a naked short sale occurs, the seller fails to deliver the securities to the buyer. \"Based on the staff's review of the available data, (GameStop) did not experience persistent fails to deliver,\" the SEC said.\nIT WASN'T ALL ABOUT GAMESTOP\nBy early 2021, individual investors were increasingly downloading broker-dealer apps and more than 100 stocks experienced large price moves or increased trading volume that significantly exceeded the broader market, the SEC said.\nFor example, single-day price changes on Jan. 27 from the closing prices on Jan. 26 for KOSS Corporation (480.0%), AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc (301.2%), Naked Brand Group (252.3%) and Express Inc (214.1%) were larger than any single-day GameStop price change, according to the SEC.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1138,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":4,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}