个人中心 - 老虎社区

Saltae

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 6帖子 · 6
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- SaltaeSaltae
  ·2021-06-18
  An article that doesnt take into account the cpu market growth by AMD, purely speculative
  1 Big Reason to Dump AMD and Buy NVIDIA<blockquote>抛弃AMD并购买NVIDIA的1大理由</blockquote>
  The graphics specialist enjoys a huge advantage over its smaller rival in an important market.
  1 Big Reason to Dump AMD and Buy NVIDIA<blockquote>抛弃AMD并购买NVIDIA的1大理由</blockquote>
  2,327 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- SaltaeSaltae
  ·2021-02-19
  For daily
  GameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote>
  Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressiona
  GameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote>
  2,673 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- SaltaeSaltae
  ·2021-02-18
  Draaamaaaa
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  992 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- SaltaeSaltae
  ·2021-02-17
  For the coins!
  Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>
  Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die. Now Japanese c
  Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>
  1,321 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- SaltaeSaltae
  ·2021-02-16
  Great
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,400 评论
  4
  分享
  举报
- SaltaeSaltae
  ·2021-02-02
  💎🖐
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,465 1
  1
  分享
  举报
暂无关注

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574863478252201","uuid":"3574863478252201","gmtCreate":1611772115202,"gmtModify":1612234350494,"name":"Saltae","pinyin":"saltae","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707c90db06b44c55897865aea5702556","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":22,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.10.02","exceedPercentage":"80.74%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":166197180,"gmtCreate":1623995298140,"gmtModify":1634024388264,"author":{"id":"3574863478252201","authorId":"3574863478252201","name":"Saltae","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707c90db06b44c55897865aea5702556","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574863478252201","idStr":"3574863478252201"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"An article that doesnt take into account the cpu market growth by AMD, purely speculative&nbsp;","listText":"An article that doesnt take into account the cpu market growth by AMD, purely speculative&nbsp;","text":"An article that doesnt take into account the cpu market growth by AMD, purely speculative","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/166197180","repostId":"1197160756","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1197160756","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623980251,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1197160756?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-18 09:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"1 Big Reason to Dump AMD and Buy NVIDIA<blockquote>抛弃AMD并购买NVIDIA的1大理由</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197160756","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The graphics specialist enjoys a huge advantage over its smaller rival in an important market.","content":"<p><b>NVIDIA</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NVDA)&nbsp;has been ruling the roost in the discrete graphics processing unit (GPU) market, despite the best efforts of&nbsp;<b>Advanced Micro Devices</b>(NASDAQ:AMD)&nbsp;to gain share in this highly lucrative space. And NVIDIA is showing no signs of losing its grip over the graphics card market, according to the latest market share numbers provided&nbsp;by Jon Peddie Research.</p><p><blockquote><b>英伟达</b>（纳斯达克：NVDA）一直在独立图形处理单元（GPU）市场上占据主导地位，尽管<b>先进微设备公司</b>（纳斯达克：AMD）在这个利润丰厚的领域获得份额。根据Jon Peddie Research提供的最新市场份额数据，NVIDIA没有表现出失去对显卡市场控制的迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Let's see why that bodes well for NVIDIA, and makes it a better bet than arch-rival AMD.</p><p><blockquote>让我们看看为什么这对NVIDIA来说是个好兆头，并使其成为比主要竞争对手AMD更好的选择。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/94007897775e469423cc8a3d1e55440d\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>NVIDIA stamps its authority on graphics cards once again</b></p><p><blockquote><b>NVIDIA再次在显卡上树立权威</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA&nbsp;finished 2020 with&nbsp;82% of the discrete graphics card market under its control, while AMD held the rest. The company's impressive momentum has spilled over into 2021, as it occupied 81% of the market in Q1. That was a nice increase&nbsp;over the year-ago period's market share of 75%.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达在2020年结束时控制了82%的独立显卡市场，而AMD则控制了其余部分。该公司令人印象深刻的势头已经蔓延到2021年，在第一季度占据了81%的市场份额。与去年同期75%的市场份额相比，这是一个不错的增长。</blockquote></p><p> AMD, on the other hand, lost market share for yet another quarter. The company has been&nbsp;losing ground&nbsp;to NVIDIA since the latter launched the&nbsp;RTX 30 series cards&nbsp;toward the end of 2020. AMD was in resurgent mode prior to the arrival of the RTX 30 series cards -- its Navi GPUs were&nbsp;making a nice dent&nbsp;in NVIDIA's graphics card supremacy a year ago. But that isn't the case anymore.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，AMD又失去了一个季度的市场份额。自英伟达在2020年底推出RTX 30系列卡以来，该公司一直在输给英伟达。在RTX 30系列卡到来之前，AMD正处于复兴模式——一年前，它的Navi GPU对NVIDIA的显卡霸主地位产生了很大的影响。但现在已经不是这样了。</blockquote></p><p> <b>NVIDIA stamps its authority on graphics cards once again</b></p><p><blockquote><b>NVIDIA再次在显卡上树立权威</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIAfinished 2020 with82% of the discrete graphics card market under its control, while AMD held the rest. The company's impressive momentum has spilled over into 2021, as it occupied 81% of the market in Q1. That was a nice increase&nbsp;over the year-ago period's market share of 75%.</p><p><blockquote>截至2020年，Nvidia控制了82%的独立显卡市场，而AMD则控制了其余市场。该公司令人印象深刻的势头已经蔓延到2021年，在第一季度占据了81%的市场份额。与去年同期75%的市场份额相比，这是一个不错的增长。</blockquote></p><p> AMD, on the other hand, lost market share for yet another quarter. The company has been&nbsp;losing ground&nbsp;to NVIDIA since the latter launched theRTX 30 series cardstoward the end of 2020. AMD was in resurgent mode prior to the arrival of the RTX 30 series cards -- its Navi GPUs weremaking a nice dentin NVIDIA's graphics card supremacy a year ago. But that isn't the case anymore.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，AMD又失去了一个季度的市场份额。自英伟达于2020年底推出TX 30系列卡以来，该公司一直在输给英伟达。在RTX 30系列卡到来之前，AMD正处于复兴模式——一年前，它的Navi GPU正在成为英伟达显卡霸主的一个很好的牙本质。但现在已经不是这样了。</blockquote></p><p> Jon Peddie Research estimates that discrete GPU shipments shot up 24.4% year-over-year. The market generated $12.5 billion in revenue in Q1, a 370% spike over the prior-year period, thanks to a&nbsp;jump in the average selling prices&nbsp;(ASPs) triggered by huge demand and short supply. NVIDIA's massive market share means that it has won big from this spike, which is reflected in its Q1 performance.</p><p><blockquote>Jon Peddie Research估计，独立GPU出货量同比猛增24.4%。由于巨大的需求和供应短缺引发的平均售价(ASP)上涨，该市场在第一季度创造了125亿美元的收入，比去年同期增长了370%。英伟达巨大的市场份额意味着它从这一飙升中受益匪浅，这反映在其第一季度的业绩中。</blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA's gaming revenue more than doubled&nbsp;year-over-year in the first quarter of fiscal 2022 to $2.76 billion. AMD's computing and graphics segment, which also includes the sales of its Ryzen desktop and notebook processors, grew at a relatively slower pace of 46% year-over-year to $2.1 billion in Q1.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达2022财年第一季度的游戏收入同比增长了一倍多，达到27.6亿美元。AMD的计算和图形部门（还包括Ryzen台式机和笔记本处理器的销售额）在第一季度同比增长46%，达到21亿美元，增速相对较慢。</blockquote></p><p> Jon Peddie Research estimates that the discrete GPU market could be worth $54 billion by 2025, compared to $23.6 billion last year. NVIDIA's dominant position should allow it to corner a substantial portion of that pie in the future, especially considering its moves to strengthen its position.</p><p><blockquote>Jon Peddie Research估计，到2025年，独立GPU市场价值可能达到540亿美元，而去年为236亿美元。英伟达的主导地位应该使其能够在未来垄断很大一部分蛋糕，特别是考虑到其加强地位的举措。</blockquote></p><p> <b>AMD's resistance may not be enough</b></p><p><blockquote><b>AMD的阻力可能还不够</b></blockquote></p><p> AMD has been trying to put up a fight against NVIDIA, and it did show some progress last quarter, registering a quarter-over-quarter market share gain of one percentage point. However, AMD is now looking to raise its game with a new technology, the FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR). This will compete with NVIDIA's deep learning super sampling (DLSS) image upscaling technology, which helps games look better and run smoother.</p><p><blockquote>AMD一直在努力对抗NVIDIA，上个季度确实取得了一些进展，市场份额环比增长了一个百分点。然而，AMD现在正寻求通过一项新技术FidelityFX超分辨率（FSR）来提高其竞争力。这将与英伟达的深度学习超级采样（DLSS）图像升级技术竞争，该技术有助于游戏看起来更好，运行更流畅。</blockquote></p><p> AMD's internal tests claim that its new tech can help games run at 59% higher frame rates on ultra-quality settings. The chipmaker also claims that FSR could increase gaming performance by 2.5 times in certain titles using the performance setting. In addition, AMD says that FSR supports a wide range of hardware that includes more than 100 processors and graphics cards thanks to its open-source nature.</p><p><blockquote>AMD的内部测试声称，其新技术可以帮助游戏在超质量设置下以59%的帧率运行。该芯片制造商还声称，使用性能设置，FSR可以将某些游戏的游戏性能提高2.5倍。此外，AMD表示，由于其开源性质，FSR支持广泛的硬件，包括100多种处理器和显卡。</blockquote></p><p> FSR will launch on June 22, and it could give AMD a nice boost in the GPU market. However, only time will tell if the new technology will translate into sales for AMD, given that its rival's DLSS tech is already in its second&nbsp;generation.</p><p><blockquote>FSR将于6月22日推出，它可能会给AMD在GPU市场带来很好的推动。然而，只有时间才能证明这项新技术是否会转化为AMD的销售额，因为其竞争对手的DLSS技术已经进入第二代。</blockquote></p><p> However, it is worth noting that NVIDIA is trying to cover as much of the GPU market as possible with new launches. The company recently released the RTX 3080 Ti and the RTX 3070 Ti GPUs, priced at $1,199 and $599, respectively. NVIDIA is giving users of older graphics cards a solid reason to upgrade with these cards. It claims that the RTX 3080 Ti is twice as fast as the older GTX 1080 Ti, while the RTX 3070 Ti delivers 1.5x the performance of the RTX 2070 Super.</p><p><blockquote>然而，值得注意的是，英伟达正试图通过新产品的发布来覆盖尽可能多的GPU市场。该公司最近发布了RTX 3080 Ti和RTX 3070 Ti GPU，售价分别为1199美元和599美元。NVIDIA给了旧显卡的用户一个升级这些显卡的充分理由。它声称RTX 3080 Ti的速度是旧的GTX 1080 Ti的两倍，而RTX 3070 Ti的性能是RTX 2070 Super的1.5倍。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> NVIDIA is also&nbsp;stepping up its game&nbsp;in the laptop market with the launch of entry-level graphics cards. The company now offers more than 140 laptop models powered by the RTX 30 cards across a wide range of prices. This puts NVIDIA in a solid position in the fast-growing gaming laptop market, which is expected to hit $15.6 billion in revenue by 2027, compared to $9 billion in 2019.</p><p><blockquote>随着入门级显卡的推出，英伟达也在加强其在笔记本电脑市场的游戏。该公司现在提供140多种由RTX 30卡驱动的笔记本电脑型号，价格范围很广。这使得英伟达在快速增长的游戏笔记本电脑市场中占据了稳固的地位，预计到2027年，该市场的收入将达到156亿美元，而2019年为90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this indicates that NVIDIA's gaming business could sustain its terrific levels of growth for a long time to come, especially considering that a huge chunk of gamers have&nbsp;yet to upgrade&nbsp;to its latest cards.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都表明，英伟达的游戏业务可能会在未来很长一段时间内保持其惊人的增长水平，特别是考虑到大量游戏玩家尚未升级到其最新的卡。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, the growth of AMD's gaming business is nowhere close to NVIDIA's, and the situation is unlikely to change given the latter's supremacy in this space. That's why investors looking to take advantage of the booming market for discrete graphics cards and add a&nbsp;top growth stock&nbsp;to their portfolios should choose NVIDIA. Gaming is its largest source of revenue, and this business could stay red-hot for a long time.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，AMD游戏业务的增长远不及英伟达，鉴于后者在这一领域的霸主地位，这种情况不太可能改变。这就是为什么希望利用蓬勃发展的独立显卡市场并在其投资组合中添加顶级增长股票的投资者应该选择英伟达。游戏是其最大的收入来源，这项业务可能会在很长一段时间内保持火热。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>1 Big Reason to Dump AMD and Buy NVIDIA<blockquote>抛弃AMD并购买NVIDIA的1大理由</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n1 Big Reason to Dump AMD and Buy NVIDIA<blockquote>抛弃AMD并购买NVIDIA的1大理由</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-18 09:37</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>NVIDIA</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NVDA)&nbsp;has been ruling the roost in the discrete graphics processing unit (GPU) market, despite the best efforts of&nbsp;<b>Advanced Micro Devices</b>(NASDAQ:AMD)&nbsp;to gain share in this highly lucrative space. And NVIDIA is showing no signs of losing its grip over the graphics card market, according to the latest market share numbers provided&nbsp;by Jon Peddie Research.</p><p><blockquote><b>英伟达</b>（纳斯达克：NVDA）一直在独立图形处理单元（GPU）市场上占据主导地位，尽管<b>先进微设备公司</b>（纳斯达克：AMD）在这个利润丰厚的领域获得份额。根据Jon Peddie Research提供的最新市场份额数据，NVIDIA没有表现出失去对显卡市场控制的迹象。</blockquote></p><p> Let's see why that bodes well for NVIDIA, and makes it a better bet than arch-rival AMD.</p><p><blockquote>让我们看看为什么这对NVIDIA来说是个好兆头，并使其成为比主要竞争对手AMD更好的选择。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/94007897775e469423cc8a3d1e55440d\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>NVIDIA stamps its authority on graphics cards once again</b></p><p><blockquote><b>NVIDIA再次在显卡上树立权威</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA&nbsp;finished 2020 with&nbsp;82% of the discrete graphics card market under its control, while AMD held the rest. The company's impressive momentum has spilled over into 2021, as it occupied 81% of the market in Q1. That was a nice increase&nbsp;over the year-ago period's market share of 75%.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达在2020年结束时控制了82%的独立显卡市场，而AMD则控制了其余部分。该公司令人印象深刻的势头已经蔓延到2021年，在第一季度占据了81%的市场份额。与去年同期75%的市场份额相比，这是一个不错的增长。</blockquote></p><p> AMD, on the other hand, lost market share for yet another quarter. The company has been&nbsp;losing ground&nbsp;to NVIDIA since the latter launched the&nbsp;RTX 30 series cards&nbsp;toward the end of 2020. AMD was in resurgent mode prior to the arrival of the RTX 30 series cards -- its Navi GPUs were&nbsp;making a nice dent&nbsp;in NVIDIA's graphics card supremacy a year ago. But that isn't the case anymore.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，AMD又失去了一个季度的市场份额。自英伟达在2020年底推出RTX 30系列卡以来，该公司一直在输给英伟达。在RTX 30系列卡到来之前，AMD正处于复兴模式——一年前，它的Navi GPU对NVIDIA的显卡霸主地位产生了很大的影响。但现在已经不是这样了。</blockquote></p><p> <b>NVIDIA stamps its authority on graphics cards once again</b></p><p><blockquote><b>NVIDIA再次在显卡上树立权威</b></blockquote></p><p> NVIDIAfinished 2020 with82% of the discrete graphics card market under its control, while AMD held the rest. The company's impressive momentum has spilled over into 2021, as it occupied 81% of the market in Q1. That was a nice increase&nbsp;over the year-ago period's market share of 75%.</p><p><blockquote>截至2020年，Nvidia控制了82%的独立显卡市场，而AMD则控制了其余市场。该公司令人印象深刻的势头已经蔓延到2021年，在第一季度占据了81%的市场份额。与去年同期75%的市场份额相比，这是一个不错的增长。</blockquote></p><p> AMD, on the other hand, lost market share for yet another quarter. The company has been&nbsp;losing ground&nbsp;to NVIDIA since the latter launched theRTX 30 series cardstoward the end of 2020. AMD was in resurgent mode prior to the arrival of the RTX 30 series cards -- its Navi GPUs weremaking a nice dentin NVIDIA's graphics card supremacy a year ago. But that isn't the case anymore.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，AMD又失去了一个季度的市场份额。自英伟达于2020年底推出TX 30系列卡以来，该公司一直在输给英伟达。在RTX 30系列卡到来之前，AMD正处于复兴模式——一年前，它的Navi GPU正在成为英伟达显卡霸主的一个很好的牙本质。但现在已经不是这样了。</blockquote></p><p> Jon Peddie Research estimates that discrete GPU shipments shot up 24.4% year-over-year. The market generated $12.5 billion in revenue in Q1, a 370% spike over the prior-year period, thanks to a&nbsp;jump in the average selling prices&nbsp;(ASPs) triggered by huge demand and short supply. NVIDIA's massive market share means that it has won big from this spike, which is reflected in its Q1 performance.</p><p><blockquote>Jon Peddie Research估计，独立GPU出货量同比猛增24.4%。由于巨大的需求和供应短缺引发的平均售价(ASP)上涨，该市场在第一季度创造了125亿美元的收入，比去年同期增长了370%。英伟达巨大的市场份额意味着它从这一飙升中受益匪浅，这反映在其第一季度的业绩中。</blockquote></p><p> NVIDIA's gaming revenue more than doubled&nbsp;year-over-year in the first quarter of fiscal 2022 to $2.76 billion. AMD's computing and graphics segment, which also includes the sales of its Ryzen desktop and notebook processors, grew at a relatively slower pace of 46% year-over-year to $2.1 billion in Q1.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达2022财年第一季度的游戏收入同比增长了一倍多，达到27.6亿美元。AMD的计算和图形部门（还包括Ryzen台式机和笔记本处理器的销售额）在第一季度同比增长46%，达到21亿美元，增速相对较慢。</blockquote></p><p> Jon Peddie Research estimates that the discrete GPU market could be worth $54 billion by 2025, compared to $23.6 billion last year. NVIDIA's dominant position should allow it to corner a substantial portion of that pie in the future, especially considering its moves to strengthen its position.</p><p><blockquote>Jon Peddie Research估计，到2025年，独立GPU市场价值可能达到540亿美元，而去年为236亿美元。英伟达的主导地位应该使其能够在未来垄断很大一部分蛋糕，特别是考虑到其加强地位的举措。</blockquote></p><p> <b>AMD's resistance may not be enough</b></p><p><blockquote><b>AMD的阻力可能还不够</b></blockquote></p><p> AMD has been trying to put up a fight against NVIDIA, and it did show some progress last quarter, registering a quarter-over-quarter market share gain of one percentage point. However, AMD is now looking to raise its game with a new technology, the FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR). This will compete with NVIDIA's deep learning super sampling (DLSS) image upscaling technology, which helps games look better and run smoother.</p><p><blockquote>AMD一直在努力对抗NVIDIA，上个季度确实取得了一些进展，市场份额环比增长了一个百分点。然而，AMD现在正寻求通过一项新技术FidelityFX超分辨率（FSR）来提高其竞争力。这将与英伟达的深度学习超级采样（DLSS）图像升级技术竞争，该技术有助于游戏看起来更好，运行更流畅。</blockquote></p><p> AMD's internal tests claim that its new tech can help games run at 59% higher frame rates on ultra-quality settings. The chipmaker also claims that FSR could increase gaming performance by 2.5 times in certain titles using the performance setting. In addition, AMD says that FSR supports a wide range of hardware that includes more than 100 processors and graphics cards thanks to its open-source nature.</p><p><blockquote>AMD的内部测试声称，其新技术可以帮助游戏在超质量设置下以59%的帧率运行。该芯片制造商还声称，使用性能设置，FSR可以将某些游戏的游戏性能提高2.5倍。此外，AMD表示，由于其开源性质，FSR支持广泛的硬件，包括100多种处理器和显卡。</blockquote></p><p> FSR will launch on June 22, and it could give AMD a nice boost in the GPU market. However, only time will tell if the new technology will translate into sales for AMD, given that its rival's DLSS tech is already in its second&nbsp;generation.</p><p><blockquote>FSR将于6月22日推出，它可能会给AMD在GPU市场带来很好的推动。然而，只有时间才能证明这项新技术是否会转化为AMD的销售额，因为其竞争对手的DLSS技术已经进入第二代。</blockquote></p><p> However, it is worth noting that NVIDIA is trying to cover as much of the GPU market as possible with new launches. The company recently released the RTX 3080 Ti and the RTX 3070 Ti GPUs, priced at $1,199 and $599, respectively. NVIDIA is giving users of older graphics cards a solid reason to upgrade with these cards. It claims that the RTX 3080 Ti is twice as fast as the older GTX 1080 Ti, while the RTX 3070 Ti delivers 1.5x the performance of the RTX 2070 Super.</p><p><blockquote>然而，值得注意的是，英伟达正试图通过新产品的发布来覆盖尽可能多的GPU市场。该公司最近发布了RTX 3080 Ti和RTX 3070 Ti GPU，售价分别为1199美元和599美元。NVIDIA给了旧显卡的用户一个升级这些显卡的充分理由。它声称RTX 3080 Ti的速度是旧的GTX 1080 Ti的两倍，而RTX 3070 Ti的性能是RTX 2070 Super的1.5倍。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> NVIDIA is also&nbsp;stepping up its game&nbsp;in the laptop market with the launch of entry-level graphics cards. The company now offers more than 140 laptop models powered by the RTX 30 cards across a wide range of prices. This puts NVIDIA in a solid position in the fast-growing gaming laptop market, which is expected to hit $15.6 billion in revenue by 2027, compared to $9 billion in 2019.</p><p><blockquote>随着入门级显卡的推出，英伟达也在加强其在笔记本电脑市场的游戏。该公司现在提供140多种由RTX 30卡驱动的笔记本电脑型号，价格范围很广。这使得英伟达在快速增长的游戏笔记本电脑市场中占据了稳固的地位，预计到2027年，该市场的收入将达到156亿美元，而2019年为90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this indicates that NVIDIA's gaming business could sustain its terrific levels of growth for a long time to come, especially considering that a huge chunk of gamers have&nbsp;yet to upgrade&nbsp;to its latest cards.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都表明，英伟达的游戏业务可能会在未来很长一段时间内保持其惊人的增长水平，特别是考虑到大量游戏玩家尚未升级到其最新的卡。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, the growth of AMD's gaming business is nowhere close to NVIDIA's, and the situation is unlikely to change given the latter's supremacy in this space. That's why investors looking to take advantage of the booming market for discrete graphics cards and add a&nbsp;top growth stock&nbsp;to their portfolios should choose NVIDIA. Gaming is its largest source of revenue, and this business could stay red-hot for a long time.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，AMD游戏业务的增长远不及英伟达，鉴于后者在这一领域的霸主地位，这种情况不太可能改变。这就是为什么希望利用蓬勃发展的独立显卡市场并在其投资组合中添加顶级增长股票的投资者应该选择英伟达。游戏是其最大的收入来源，这项业务可能会在很长一段时间内保持火热。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/17/1-big-reason-to-dump-amd-and-buy-nvidia/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/17/1-big-reason-to-dump-amd-and-buy-nvidia/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197160756","content_text":"NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been ruling the roost in the discrete graphics processing unit (GPU) market, despite the best efforts of Advanced Micro Devices(NASDAQ:AMD) to gain share in this highly lucrative space. And NVIDIA is showing no signs of losing its grip over the graphics card market, according to the latest market share numbers provided by Jon Peddie Research.\nLet's see why that bodes well for NVIDIA, and makes it a better bet than arch-rival AMD.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES\nNVIDIA stamps its authority on graphics cards once again\nNVIDIA finished 2020 with 82% of the discrete graphics card market under its control, while AMD held the rest. The company's impressive momentum has spilled over into 2021, as it occupied 81% of the market in Q1. That was a nice increase over the year-ago period's market share of 75%.\nAMD, on the other hand, lost market share for yet another quarter. The company has been losing ground to NVIDIA since the latter launched the RTX 30 series cards toward the end of 2020. AMD was in resurgent mode prior to the arrival of the RTX 30 series cards -- its Navi GPUs were making a nice dent in NVIDIA's graphics card supremacy a year ago. But that isn't the case anymore.\nNVIDIA stamps its authority on graphics cards once again\nNVIDIAfinished 2020 with82% of the discrete graphics card market under its control, while AMD held the rest. The company's impressive momentum has spilled over into 2021, as it occupied 81% of the market in Q1. That was a nice increase over the year-ago period's market share of 75%.\nAMD, on the other hand, lost market share for yet another quarter. The company has been losing ground to NVIDIA since the latter launched theRTX 30 series cardstoward the end of 2020. AMD was in resurgent mode prior to the arrival of the RTX 30 series cards -- its Navi GPUs weremaking a nice dentin NVIDIA's graphics card supremacy a year ago. But that isn't the case anymore.\nJon Peddie Research estimates that discrete GPU shipments shot up 24.4% year-over-year. The market generated $12.5 billion in revenue in Q1, a 370% spike over the prior-year period, thanks to a jump in the average selling prices (ASPs) triggered by huge demand and short supply. NVIDIA's massive market share means that it has won big from this spike, which is reflected in its Q1 performance.\nNVIDIA's gaming revenue more than doubled year-over-year in the first quarter of fiscal 2022 to $2.76 billion. AMD's computing and graphics segment, which also includes the sales of its Ryzen desktop and notebook processors, grew at a relatively slower pace of 46% year-over-year to $2.1 billion in Q1.\nJon Peddie Research estimates that the discrete GPU market could be worth $54 billion by 2025, compared to $23.6 billion last year. NVIDIA's dominant position should allow it to corner a substantial portion of that pie in the future, especially considering its moves to strengthen its position.\nAMD's resistance may not be enough\nAMD has been trying to put up a fight against NVIDIA, and it did show some progress last quarter, registering a quarter-over-quarter market share gain of one percentage point. However, AMD is now looking to raise its game with a new technology, the FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR). This will compete with NVIDIA's deep learning super sampling (DLSS) image upscaling technology, which helps games look better and run smoother.\nAMD's internal tests claim that its new tech can help games run at 59% higher frame rates on ultra-quality settings. The chipmaker also claims that FSR could increase gaming performance by 2.5 times in certain titles using the performance setting. In addition, AMD says that FSR supports a wide range of hardware that includes more than 100 processors and graphics cards thanks to its open-source nature.\nFSR will launch on June 22, and it could give AMD a nice boost in the GPU market. However, only time will tell if the new technology will translate into sales for AMD, given that its rival's DLSS tech is already in its second generation.\nHowever, it is worth noting that NVIDIA is trying to cover as much of the GPU market as possible with new launches. The company recently released the RTX 3080 Ti and the RTX 3070 Ti GPUs, priced at $1,199 and $599, respectively. NVIDIA is giving users of older graphics cards a solid reason to upgrade with these cards. It claims that the RTX 3080 Ti is twice as fast as the older GTX 1080 Ti, while the RTX 3070 Ti delivers 1.5x the performance of the RTX 2070 Super.\nNVIDIA is also stepping up its game in the laptop market with the launch of entry-level graphics cards. The company now offers more than 140 laptop models powered by the RTX 30 cards across a wide range of prices. This puts NVIDIA in a solid position in the fast-growing gaming laptop market, which is expected to hit $15.6 billion in revenue by 2027, compared to $9 billion in 2019.\nAll of this indicates that NVIDIA's gaming business could sustain its terrific levels of growth for a long time to come, especially considering that a huge chunk of gamers have yet to upgrade to its latest cards.\nMeanwhile, the growth of AMD's gaming business is nowhere close to NVIDIA's, and the situation is unlikely to change given the latter's supremacy in this space. That's why investors looking to take advantage of the booming market for discrete graphics cards and add a top growth stock to their portfolios should choose NVIDIA. Gaming is its largest source of revenue, and this business could stay red-hot for a long time.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9,"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2327,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387957091,"gmtCreate":1613713491813,"gmtModify":1634552534447,"author":{"id":"3574863478252201","authorId":"3574863478252201","name":"Saltae","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707c90db06b44c55897865aea5702556","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574863478252201","idStr":"3574863478252201"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"For daily","listText":"For daily","text":"For daily","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387957091","repostId":"1103921295","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103921295","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613706165,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103921295?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-19 11:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103921295","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressiona","content":"<p>  <b>Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressional hearing on GameStop’s rise and fall.</b>  YOLO? Maybe not quite so.</p><p><blockquote><b>Robinhood首席执行官Vlad Tenev在关于游戏驿站兴衰的国会听证会上讨论了平均账户规模和用户人口统计数据。</b>约洛？也许不完全是这样。</blockquote></p><p> During the GameStop trading frenzy, some observers worried many rookie retail investors banding together on sites like Reddit’s WallStreetBets would bet big — a so-called “YOLO trade” in the forum’sslang— andend up losing badly.</p><p><blockquote>在游戏驿站交易狂潮期间，一些观察人士担心，许多在Reddit的WallStreetBets等网站上聚集在一起的新手散户投资者会下大赌注——用论坛的俚语来说就是所谓的“YOLO交易”——最终输得很惨。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, this wasa serious event that rocked the stock market, bringing it “dangerously close” to collapse, according to Thomas Peterffy, founder and chairman of Interactive Brokers Group.</p><p><blockquote>盈透证券集团创始人兼董事长托马斯·彼得菲表示，毫无疑问，这是一个震惊股市的严重事件，使其“危险地接近”崩溃。</blockquote></p><p> But at a closely-watched congressional hearing Thursday on the rise and fall of GameStop shares and other so-called “meme stocks,” statements by one of the key players in the trading firestorm revealed that young investors generally aren’t betting big to reap quick gains.</p><p><blockquote>但在周四举行的备受关注的关于游戏驿站股票和其他所谓“模因股票”涨跌的国会听证会上，交易风暴中的一位关键人物的声明显示，年轻投资者通常不会下大赌注以获得快速收益。</blockquote></p><p> “Contrary to some very misleading and highly uninformed reports, we see evidence that most of our customers are investing for the long term,” said Vlad Tenev, CEO of Robinhood, the popular trading platform that caughtmassive irefor temporarily restricting trades on GameStopGME,-11.43%,AMC EntertainmentAMC,-0.72%and several other companies. As the hearing continued, he repeated that point under lawmaker questions.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood首席执行官弗拉德·特涅夫(Vlad Tenev)表示：“与一些极具误导性和高度不知情的报道相反，我们看到证据表明我们的大多数客户都在进行长期投资。”Robinhood是一个受欢迎的交易平台，因暂时限制GameStopGME(-11.43%)、AMC EntertainmentAMC(-0.72%)和其他几家公司的交易而引起了大规模关注。随着听证会的继续，他在议员的提问下重复了这一点。</blockquote></p><p> “What we see is generally not consistent with popular memes suggesting that most of our brokerage customers are unsophisticated day traders taking inordinate risks with large sums of money on complex financial products,”Tenev wrote in prepared testimony submitted ahead of the hearing,pushing back on the idea that his companyencouraged reckless tradingon a platform with 13 million users.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫在听证会前提交的准备好的证词中写道：“我们所看到的通常与流行的模因不一致，这些模因表明我们的大多数经纪客户都是不成熟的日内交易者，在复杂的金融产品上投入大量资金承担了过度的风险。”他的公司鼓励在一个拥有1300万用户的平台上进行鲁莽交易的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Just 2% of Robinhood users qualified as “pattern day traders” who made four or more trades within five business days, he said. Thirteen percent traded basic options contracts, which can be higher risk, higher reward than straight-ahead buying or selling.</p><p><blockquote>他说，只有2%的Robinhood用户符合“模式日内交易者”的资格，他们在五个工作日内进行了四笔或更多交易。13%的人交易基本期权合约，这可能比直接买入或卖出风险更高，回报更高。</blockquote></p><p> In the face of some pointed questions, he also insisted Robinhood isn’t trying to turn the user experience into a game. “We know investing is serious and that’s why most of our customers are buy and hold,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>面对一些尖锐的问题，他还坚称Robinhood并没有试图将用户体验变成游戏。“我们知道投资是严肃的，这就是为什么我们的大多数客户都是买入并持有，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> (Before the GameStop saga, Massachusetts state regulators filed a complaint against Robinhood for allegedly making trading seem too fun until loses occur. The company previously said itdisputes the allegation.)</p><p><blockquote>（在游戏驿站事件发生之前，马萨诸塞州监管机构对Robinhood提起诉讼，指控其让交易看起来太有趣，直到发生损失。该公司此前表示对这一指控提出异议。）</blockquote></p><p> Tenev and lawmakershave sparredon what Robinhood should and shouldn’t have done during the GameStop saga. GameStop shares once traded at a high point of $483. By Thursday’s market close, GameStop shares were $40.69.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫和立法者就罗宾汉在游戏驿站传奇中应该做什么和不应该做什么进行了争论。游戏驿站股价一度交易到483美元的高点。截至周四收盘，游戏驿站股价为40.69美元。</blockquote></p><p> But either way, Tenev’s testimony gave an interesting peek at who the newest retail investors are and how much money they are pouring into the market. After all, retail investors were already increasingly entering the stock market before the GameStop drama started.</p><p><blockquote>但不管怎样，特涅夫的证词让我们有趣地了解了谁是最新的散户投资者以及他们向市场投入了多少资金。毕竟，在游戏驿站大戏开始之前，散户投资者就已经越来越多地进入股市。</blockquote></p><p> Fifty-five percent of Americans directly own stock, according to aGallup surveylast year, while 32% of 18- to 29-year-olds said they owned stock.</p><p><blockquote>根据aGallup去年的调查，55%的美国人直接拥有股票，而18至29岁的人中有32%表示他们拥有股票。</blockquote></p><p> The median age of Robinhood investors is 31 and half of users say they are first-time investors. The median account size is about $240, according to Tenev’s statement, and the average account size is about $5,000.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood投资者的平均年龄为31岁，一半的用户表示他们是首次投资者。根据Tenev的声明，账户规模中位数约为240美元，平均账户规模约为5,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The fact that 13% of Robinhood users are trading options gives some advocates pause. Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America,saidthat “strikes us as a pretty high percentage when you consider the characteristics of Robinhood’s customer base (disproportionately young, first-time investors with small accounts).”</p><p><blockquote>13%的Robinhood用户正在交易期权，这一事实让一些倡导者犹豫了。美国消费者联合会投资者保护主任芭芭拉·罗珀(Barbara Roper)表示，“考虑到Robinhood客户群的特征（不成比例的年轻、账户较小的首次投资者），我们发现这一比例相当高。”</blockquote></p><p> Robinhood investors also tend to be a slightly more racially diverse crowd, according to Tenev’s testimony. Nine percent of users are Black, compared to 3% at other firms and 16% are Hispanic, versus 7% at other firms, according to Tenev’s statement.</p><p><blockquote>根据特涅夫的证词，Robinhood投资者的种族也往往更加多元化。根据Tenev的声明，9%的用户是黑人，而其他公司的这一比例为3%；16%是西班牙裔，而其他公司的这一比例为7%。</blockquote></p><p> “Retail investors making up this new surge are different,” testified Jennifer Schulp, the Cato Institute’s director of financial regulation studies.</p><p><blockquote>卡托研究所金融监管研究主任詹妮弗·舒尔普(Jennifer Schulp)表示：“构成这一新浪潮的散户投资者有所不同。”</blockquote></p><p> Retail investors are nicknamed as“dumb money”on Wall Street, Schulp said. “I think it’s insulting. I think the term needs to go out the window. I think the GameStop situation is proof the retail investors are revolutionizing the market …. I think the retail investors here are learning by doing, which is one of the best ways to learn.”</p><p><blockquote>舒尔普说，散户投资者在华尔街被戏称为“傻钱”。“我认为这是一种侮辱。我认为这个词需要被抛弃。我认为游戏驿站的情况证明散户投资者正在彻底改变市场……我认为这里的散户投资者正在边做边学，这是最好的学习方式之一。”</blockquote></p><p> She pointed to research from theFINRA Investor Education Foundationreleased earlier this month digging into the demographics and account balances of new retail investors.</p><p><blockquote>她指出，FINRA投资者教育基金会本月早些时候发布的研究深入研究了新散户投资者的人口统计数据和账户余额。</blockquote></p><p> One-third of new investors who opened a taxable investment account for the first time in 2020 said they had account balances of less than $500, versus 16% of experienced investors. Twenty-three percent of new investors had account balances up to $2,000. Twenty percent of experienced investors had account balances up to $2,000.</p><p><blockquote>2020年首次开设应税投资账户的新投资者中有三分之一表示，他们的账户余额低于500美元，而经验丰富的投资者这一比例为16%。23%的新投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。20%有经验的投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The survey found a more racially diverse set of new investors, with 17% of new investors being Black. Seven percent of experienced investors are Black, the poll said.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，新投资者的种族更加多元化，17%的新投资者是黑人。调查显示，有经验的投资者中有7%是黑人。</blockquote></p><p> As the hearing continued, some lawmakers questioned whether more guardrails need to be in place, while others said lawmakers shouldn’t condescend to retail investors and assume they know best.</p><p><blockquote>随着听证会的继续，一些议员质疑是否需要设置更多护栏，而另一些议员则表示，议员不应该屈尊于散户投资者，并认为他们最了解。</blockquote></p><p> “Many Americans feel that the system is stacked against them and no matter what, Wall Street always wins,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. “In this instance, many retail investors appeared motivated by a desire to beat Wall Street at its own game and given the losses that many retail investors have sustained as a result of volatility in the system, there are many whose beliefs that the system is rigged against them has been reinforced.”</p><p><blockquote>众议院金融服务委员会主席、众议员玛克辛·沃特斯表示：“许多美国人认为这个体系对他们不利，无论如何，华尔街总是获胜。”“在这种情况下，许多散户投资者似乎是出于在华尔街自己的游戏中击败华尔街的愿望，考虑到许多散户投资者因系统波动而遭受的损失，许多人认为该系统是针对他们的操纵行为得到了加强。”</blockquote></p><p> The GameStop saga was a “fundamental change,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, the ranking Republican on the committee. The swell in trading was propelled by social media and a wealth of new information at investors’ fingertips.</p><p><blockquote>该委员会资深共和党众议员Patrick McHenry表示，游戏驿站事件是一个“根本性的变化”。社交媒体和投资者唾手可得的大量新信息推动了交易的激增。</blockquote></p><p> “I think if we’ve learned anything from these past few weeks, it’s that these average everyday investors are pretty darn sophisticated,” McHenry said. “There is wisdom to the crowd.”</p><p><blockquote>麦克亨利说：“我认为，如果说我们从过去几周中学到了什么的话，那就是这些普通的日常投资者非常老练。”“群众有智慧。”</blockquote></p><p> The government needs to make it easier for everyday investors to buy into the market, he said. “Instead of shutting the American public out through new regulations, new forms of taxation or so-called protections, let’s use this opprotunity to side with them.”</p><p><blockquote>他说，政府需要让普通投资者更容易买入市场。“与其通过新法规、新形式的税收或所谓的保护措施将美国公众拒之门外，不如利用这个机会站在他们一边。”</blockquote></p><p> One of the witnesses was Keith Gill, a 34-year-old independent investor with online handles like “Roaring Kitty” who turned his GameStop investment into millions. He made all his investment decisions based on publicly-availabile information, he told Congress.</p><p><blockquote>目击者之一是基思·吉尔(Keith Gill)，他是一位34岁的独立投资者，拥有“咆哮的小猫”等在线账号，他将自己在游戏驿站的投资变成了数百万美元。他告诉国会，他所有的投资决策都是根据公开信息做出的。</blockquote></p><p> “I would be the first to acknowledge that investing in stocks and options is incredibly risky, and it’s so important for people to do their own thorough research before investing,” Gill said. “Folks should be able to freely express their views on a stock, and they should be able to buy or not buy a stock based on those views.”</p><p><blockquote>吉尔说：“我是第一个承认投资股票和期权风险极高的人，人们在投资前进行彻底的研究非常重要。”“人们应该能够自由表达他们对股票的看法，并且他们应该能够根据这些观点购买或不购买股票。”</blockquote></p><p> GameStop shares are up nearly 116% year-to-date. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;is up nearly 3% and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;is up more than 4% in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站股价今年迄今已上涨近116%。2021年，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨近3%，标普500上涨超过4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-19 11:42</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  <b>Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressional hearing on GameStop’s rise and fall.</b>  YOLO? Maybe not quite so.</p><p><blockquote><b>Robinhood首席执行官Vlad Tenev在关于游戏驿站兴衰的国会听证会上讨论了平均账户规模和用户人口统计数据。</b>约洛？也许不完全是这样。</blockquote></p><p> During the GameStop trading frenzy, some observers worried many rookie retail investors banding together on sites like Reddit’s WallStreetBets would bet big — a so-called “YOLO trade” in the forum’sslang— andend up losing badly.</p><p><blockquote>在游戏驿站交易狂潮期间，一些观察人士担心，许多在Reddit的WallStreetBets等网站上聚集在一起的新手散户投资者会下大赌注——用论坛的俚语来说就是所谓的“YOLO交易”——最终输得很惨。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, this wasa serious event that rocked the stock market, bringing it “dangerously close” to collapse, according to Thomas Peterffy, founder and chairman of Interactive Brokers Group.</p><p><blockquote>盈透证券集团创始人兼董事长托马斯·彼得菲表示，毫无疑问，这是一个震惊股市的严重事件，使其“危险地接近”崩溃。</blockquote></p><p> But at a closely-watched congressional hearing Thursday on the rise and fall of GameStop shares and other so-called “meme stocks,” statements by one of the key players in the trading firestorm revealed that young investors generally aren’t betting big to reap quick gains.</p><p><blockquote>但在周四举行的备受关注的关于游戏驿站股票和其他所谓“模因股票”涨跌的国会听证会上，交易风暴中的一位关键人物的声明显示，年轻投资者通常不会下大赌注以获得快速收益。</blockquote></p><p> “Contrary to some very misleading and highly uninformed reports, we see evidence that most of our customers are investing for the long term,” said Vlad Tenev, CEO of Robinhood, the popular trading platform that caughtmassive irefor temporarily restricting trades on GameStopGME,-11.43%,AMC EntertainmentAMC,-0.72%and several other companies. As the hearing continued, he repeated that point under lawmaker questions.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood首席执行官弗拉德·特涅夫(Vlad Tenev)表示：“与一些极具误导性和高度不知情的报道相反，我们看到证据表明我们的大多数客户都在进行长期投资。”Robinhood是一个受欢迎的交易平台，因暂时限制GameStopGME(-11.43%)、AMC EntertainmentAMC(-0.72%)和其他几家公司的交易而引起了大规模关注。随着听证会的继续，他在议员的提问下重复了这一点。</blockquote></p><p> “What we see is generally not consistent with popular memes suggesting that most of our brokerage customers are unsophisticated day traders taking inordinate risks with large sums of money on complex financial products,”Tenev wrote in prepared testimony submitted ahead of the hearing,pushing back on the idea that his companyencouraged reckless tradingon a platform with 13 million users.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫在听证会前提交的准备好的证词中写道：“我们所看到的通常与流行的模因不一致，这些模因表明我们的大多数经纪客户都是不成熟的日内交易者，在复杂的金融产品上投入大量资金承担了过度的风险。”他的公司鼓励在一个拥有1300万用户的平台上进行鲁莽交易的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Just 2% of Robinhood users qualified as “pattern day traders” who made four or more trades within five business days, he said. Thirteen percent traded basic options contracts, which can be higher risk, higher reward than straight-ahead buying or selling.</p><p><blockquote>他说，只有2%的Robinhood用户符合“模式日内交易者”的资格，他们在五个工作日内进行了四笔或更多交易。13%的人交易基本期权合约，这可能比直接买入或卖出风险更高，回报更高。</blockquote></p><p> In the face of some pointed questions, he also insisted Robinhood isn’t trying to turn the user experience into a game. “We know investing is serious and that’s why most of our customers are buy and hold,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>面对一些尖锐的问题，他还坚称Robinhood并没有试图将用户体验变成游戏。“我们知道投资是严肃的，这就是为什么我们的大多数客户都是买入并持有，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> (Before the GameStop saga, Massachusetts state regulators filed a complaint against Robinhood for allegedly making trading seem too fun until loses occur. The company previously said itdisputes the allegation.)</p><p><blockquote>（在游戏驿站事件发生之前，马萨诸塞州监管机构对Robinhood提起诉讼，指控其让交易看起来太有趣，直到发生损失。该公司此前表示对这一指控提出异议。）</blockquote></p><p> Tenev and lawmakershave sparredon what Robinhood should and shouldn’t have done during the GameStop saga. GameStop shares once traded at a high point of $483. By Thursday’s market close, GameStop shares were $40.69.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫和立法者就罗宾汉在游戏驿站传奇中应该做什么和不应该做什么进行了争论。游戏驿站股价一度交易到483美元的高点。截至周四收盘，游戏驿站股价为40.69美元。</blockquote></p><p> But either way, Tenev’s testimony gave an interesting peek at who the newest retail investors are and how much money they are pouring into the market. After all, retail investors were already increasingly entering the stock market before the GameStop drama started.</p><p><blockquote>但不管怎样，特涅夫的证词让我们有趣地了解了谁是最新的散户投资者以及他们向市场投入了多少资金。毕竟，在游戏驿站大戏开始之前，散户投资者就已经越来越多地进入股市。</blockquote></p><p> Fifty-five percent of Americans directly own stock, according to aGallup surveylast year, while 32% of 18- to 29-year-olds said they owned stock.</p><p><blockquote>根据aGallup去年的调查，55%的美国人直接拥有股票，而18至29岁的人中有32%表示他们拥有股票。</blockquote></p><p> The median age of Robinhood investors is 31 and half of users say they are first-time investors. The median account size is about $240, according to Tenev’s statement, and the average account size is about $5,000.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood投资者的平均年龄为31岁，一半的用户表示他们是首次投资者。根据Tenev的声明，账户规模中位数约为240美元，平均账户规模约为5,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The fact that 13% of Robinhood users are trading options gives some advocates pause. Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America,saidthat “strikes us as a pretty high percentage when you consider the characteristics of Robinhood’s customer base (disproportionately young, first-time investors with small accounts).”</p><p><blockquote>13%的Robinhood用户正在交易期权，这一事实让一些倡导者犹豫了。美国消费者联合会投资者保护主任芭芭拉·罗珀(Barbara Roper)表示，“考虑到Robinhood客户群的特征（不成比例的年轻、账户较小的首次投资者），我们发现这一比例相当高。”</blockquote></p><p> Robinhood investors also tend to be a slightly more racially diverse crowd, according to Tenev’s testimony. Nine percent of users are Black, compared to 3% at other firms and 16% are Hispanic, versus 7% at other firms, according to Tenev’s statement.</p><p><blockquote>根据特涅夫的证词，Robinhood投资者的种族也往往更加多元化。根据Tenev的声明，9%的用户是黑人，而其他公司的这一比例为3%；16%是西班牙裔，而其他公司的这一比例为7%。</blockquote></p><p> “Retail investors making up this new surge are different,” testified Jennifer Schulp, the Cato Institute’s director of financial regulation studies.</p><p><blockquote>卡托研究所金融监管研究主任詹妮弗·舒尔普(Jennifer Schulp)表示：“构成这一新浪潮的散户投资者有所不同。”</blockquote></p><p> Retail investors are nicknamed as“dumb money”on Wall Street, Schulp said. “I think it’s insulting. I think the term needs to go out the window. I think the GameStop situation is proof the retail investors are revolutionizing the market …. I think the retail investors here are learning by doing, which is one of the best ways to learn.”</p><p><blockquote>舒尔普说，散户投资者在华尔街被戏称为“傻钱”。“我认为这是一种侮辱。我认为这个词需要被抛弃。我认为游戏驿站的情况证明散户投资者正在彻底改变市场……我认为这里的散户投资者正在边做边学，这是最好的学习方式之一。”</blockquote></p><p> She pointed to research from theFINRA Investor Education Foundationreleased earlier this month digging into the demographics and account balances of new retail investors.</p><p><blockquote>她指出，FINRA投资者教育基金会本月早些时候发布的研究深入研究了新散户投资者的人口统计数据和账户余额。</blockquote></p><p> One-third of new investors who opened a taxable investment account for the first time in 2020 said they had account balances of less than $500, versus 16% of experienced investors. Twenty-three percent of new investors had account balances up to $2,000. Twenty percent of experienced investors had account balances up to $2,000.</p><p><blockquote>2020年首次开设应税投资账户的新投资者中有三分之一表示，他们的账户余额低于500美元，而经验丰富的投资者这一比例为16%。23%的新投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。20%有经验的投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The survey found a more racially diverse set of new investors, with 17% of new investors being Black. Seven percent of experienced investors are Black, the poll said.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，新投资者的种族更加多元化，17%的新投资者是黑人。调查显示，有经验的投资者中有7%是黑人。</blockquote></p><p> As the hearing continued, some lawmakers questioned whether more guardrails need to be in place, while others said lawmakers shouldn’t condescend to retail investors and assume they know best.</p><p><blockquote>随着听证会的继续，一些议员质疑是否需要设置更多护栏，而另一些议员则表示，议员不应该屈尊于散户投资者，并认为他们最了解。</blockquote></p><p> “Many Americans feel that the system is stacked against them and no matter what, Wall Street always wins,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. “In this instance, many retail investors appeared motivated by a desire to beat Wall Street at its own game and given the losses that many retail investors have sustained as a result of volatility in the system, there are many whose beliefs that the system is rigged against them has been reinforced.”</p><p><blockquote>众议院金融服务委员会主席、众议员玛克辛·沃特斯表示：“许多美国人认为这个体系对他们不利，无论如何，华尔街总是获胜。”“在这种情况下，许多散户投资者似乎是出于在华尔街自己的游戏中击败华尔街的愿望，考虑到许多散户投资者因系统波动而遭受的损失，许多人认为该系统是针对他们的操纵行为得到了加强。”</blockquote></p><p> The GameStop saga was a “fundamental change,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, the ranking Republican on the committee. The swell in trading was propelled by social media and a wealth of new information at investors’ fingertips.</p><p><blockquote>该委员会资深共和党众议员Patrick McHenry表示，游戏驿站事件是一个“根本性的变化”。社交媒体和投资者唾手可得的大量新信息推动了交易的激增。</blockquote></p><p> “I think if we’ve learned anything from these past few weeks, it’s that these average everyday investors are pretty darn sophisticated,” McHenry said. “There is wisdom to the crowd.”</p><p><blockquote>麦克亨利说：“我认为，如果说我们从过去几周中学到了什么的话，那就是这些普通的日常投资者非常老练。”“群众有智慧。”</blockquote></p><p> The government needs to make it easier for everyday investors to buy into the market, he said. “Instead of shutting the American public out through new regulations, new forms of taxation or so-called protections, let’s use this opprotunity to side with them.”</p><p><blockquote>他说，政府需要让普通投资者更容易买入市场。“与其通过新法规、新形式的税收或所谓的保护措施将美国公众拒之门外，不如利用这个机会站在他们一边。”</blockquote></p><p> One of the witnesses was Keith Gill, a 34-year-old independent investor with online handles like “Roaring Kitty” who turned his GameStop investment into millions. He made all his investment decisions based on publicly-availabile information, he told Congress.</p><p><blockquote>目击者之一是基思·吉尔(Keith Gill)，他是一位34岁的独立投资者，拥有“咆哮的小猫”等在线账号，他将自己在游戏驿站的投资变成了数百万美元。他告诉国会，他所有的投资决策都是根据公开信息做出的。</blockquote></p><p> “I would be the first to acknowledge that investing in stocks and options is incredibly risky, and it’s so important for people to do their own thorough research before investing,” Gill said. “Folks should be able to freely express their views on a stock, and they should be able to buy or not buy a stock based on those views.”</p><p><blockquote>吉尔说：“我是第一个承认投资股票和期权风险极高的人，人们在投资前进行彻底的研究非常重要。”“人们应该能够自由表达他们对股票的看法，并且他们应该能够根据这些观点购买或不购买股票。”</blockquote></p><p> GameStop shares are up nearly 116% year-to-date. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;is up nearly 3% and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;is up more than 4% in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站股价今年迄今已上涨近116%。2021年，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨近3%，标普500上涨超过4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/gamestop-hearing-challenges-assumptions-about-rookie-investors-retail-investors-making-up-this-new-surge-are-different-11613680041?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/gamestop-hearing-challenges-assumptions-about-rookie-investors-retail-investors-making-up-this-new-surge-are-different-11613680041?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1103921295","content_text":"Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressional hearing on GameStop’s rise and fall.\n\nYOLO? Maybe not quite so.\nDuring the GameStop trading frenzy, some observers worried many rookie retail investors banding together on sites like Reddit’s WallStreetBets would bet big — a so-called “YOLO trade” in the forum’sslang— andend up losing badly.\nNo doubt, this wasa serious event that rocked the stock market, bringing it “dangerously close” to collapse, according to Thomas Peterffy, founder and chairman of Interactive Brokers Group.\nBut at a closely-watched congressional hearing Thursday on the rise and fall of GameStop shares and other so-called “meme stocks,” statements by one of the key players in the trading firestorm revealed that young investors generally aren’t betting big to reap quick gains.\n“Contrary to some very misleading and highly uninformed reports, we see evidence that most of our customers are investing for the long term,” said Vlad Tenev, CEO of Robinhood, the popular trading platform that caughtmassive irefor temporarily restricting trades on GameStopGME,-11.43%,AMC EntertainmentAMC,-0.72%and several other companies. As the hearing continued, he repeated that point under lawmaker questions.\n“What we see is generally not consistent with popular memes suggesting that most of our brokerage customers are unsophisticated day traders taking inordinate risks with large sums of money on complex financial products,”Tenev wrote in prepared testimony submitted ahead of the hearing,pushing back on the idea that his companyencouraged reckless tradingon a platform with 13 million users.\nJust 2% of Robinhood users qualified as “pattern day traders” who made four or more trades within five business days, he said. Thirteen percent traded basic options contracts, which can be higher risk, higher reward than straight-ahead buying or selling.\nIn the face of some pointed questions, he also insisted Robinhood isn’t trying to turn the user experience into a game. “We know investing is serious and that’s why most of our customers are buy and hold,” he said.\n(Before the GameStop saga, Massachusetts state regulators filed a complaint against Robinhood for allegedly making trading seem too fun until loses occur. The company previously said itdisputes the allegation.)\nTenev and lawmakershave sparredon what Robinhood should and shouldn’t have done during the GameStop saga. GameStop shares once traded at a high point of $483. By Thursday’s market close, GameStop shares were $40.69.\nBut either way, Tenev’s testimony gave an interesting peek at who the newest retail investors are and how much money they are pouring into the market. After all, retail investors were already increasingly entering the stock market before the GameStop drama started.\nFifty-five percent of Americans directly own stock, according to aGallup surveylast year, while 32% of 18- to 29-year-olds said they owned stock.\nThe median age of Robinhood investors is 31 and half of users say they are first-time investors. The median account size is about $240, according to Tenev’s statement, and the average account size is about $5,000.\nThe fact that 13% of Robinhood users are trading options gives some advocates pause. Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America,saidthat “strikes us as a pretty high percentage when you consider the characteristics of Robinhood’s customer base (disproportionately young, first-time investors with small accounts).”\nRobinhood investors also tend to be a slightly more racially diverse crowd, according to Tenev’s testimony. Nine percent of users are Black, compared to 3% at other firms and 16% are Hispanic, versus 7% at other firms, according to Tenev’s statement.\n“Retail investors making up this new surge are different,” testified Jennifer Schulp, the Cato Institute’s director of financial regulation studies.\nRetail investors are nicknamed as“dumb money”on Wall Street, Schulp said. “I think it’s insulting. I think the term needs to go out the window. I think the GameStop situation is proof the retail investors are revolutionizing the market …. I think the retail investors here are learning by doing, which is one of the best ways to learn.”\nShe pointed to research from theFINRA Investor Education Foundationreleased earlier this month digging into the demographics and account balances of new retail investors.\nOne-third of new investors who opened a taxable investment account for the first time in 2020 said they had account balances of less than $500, versus 16% of experienced investors. Twenty-three percent of new investors had account balances up to $2,000. Twenty percent of experienced investors had account balances up to $2,000.\nThe survey found a more racially diverse set of new investors, with 17% of new investors being Black. Seven percent of experienced investors are Black, the poll said.\nAs the hearing continued, some lawmakers questioned whether more guardrails need to be in place, while others said lawmakers shouldn’t condescend to retail investors and assume they know best.\n“Many Americans feel that the system is stacked against them and no matter what, Wall Street always wins,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. “In this instance, many retail investors appeared motivated by a desire to beat Wall Street at its own game and given the losses that many retail investors have sustained as a result of volatility in the system, there are many whose beliefs that the system is rigged against them has been reinforced.”\nThe GameStop saga was a “fundamental change,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, the ranking Republican on the committee. The swell in trading was propelled by social media and a wealth of new information at investors’ fingertips.\n“I think if we’ve learned anything from these past few weeks, it’s that these average everyday investors are pretty darn sophisticated,” McHenry said. “There is wisdom to the crowd.”\nThe government needs to make it easier for everyday investors to buy into the market, he said. “Instead of shutting the American public out through new regulations, new forms of taxation or so-called protections, let’s use this opprotunity to side with them.”\nOne of the witnesses was Keith Gill, a 34-year-old independent investor with online handles like “Roaring Kitty” who turned his GameStop investment into millions. He made all his investment decisions based on publicly-availabile information, he told Congress.\n“I would be the first to acknowledge that investing in stocks and options is incredibly risky, and it’s so important for people to do their own thorough research before investing,” Gill said. “Folks should be able to freely express their views on a stock, and they should be able to buy or not buy a stock based on those views.”\nGameStop shares are up nearly 116% year-to-date. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is up nearly 3% and the S&P 500 is up more than 4% in 2021.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2673,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384320647,"gmtCreate":1613616738889,"gmtModify":1634552928621,"author":{"id":"3574863478252201","authorId":"3574863478252201","name":"Saltae","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707c90db06b44c55897865aea5702556","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574863478252201","idStr":"3574863478252201"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Draaamaaaa","listText":"Draaamaaaa","text":"Draaamaaaa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/384320647","repostId":"1115540467","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":992,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":385849358,"gmtCreate":1613535387774,"gmtModify":1634553257634,"author":{"id":"3574863478252201","authorId":"3574863478252201","name":"Saltae","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707c90db06b44c55897865aea5702556","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574863478252201","idStr":"3574863478252201"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"For the coins!","listText":"For the coins!","text":"For the coins!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/385849358","repostId":"1106575642","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106575642","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613532872,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106575642?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-17 11:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106575642","media":"Barrons","summary":"Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die.\nNow Japanese c","content":"<p>Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car&nbsp;produced by Apple&nbsp;just won’t die.</p><p><blockquote>关于苹果生产的全电动自动驾驶汽车的猜测不会消失。</blockquote></p><p> Now Japanese car maker&nbsp;Nissan Motor(ticker: 7201.Japan) has denied reports that it is in talks to be the builder of an Apple-branded vehicle. The iCar has resulted in a lot of Wall Street&nbsp;research reports, but few hard numbers about what an&nbsp;Apple(AAPL) entry might mean for the global car business. What’s more, tech and car analysts have slightly different takes on what the Apple car means.</p><p><blockquote>现在，日本汽车制造商日产汽车（股票代码：7201.Japan）否认了有关其正在洽谈成为苹果品牌汽车制造商的报道。iCar引发了许多华尔街研究报告，但关于苹果(AAPL)的加入对全球汽车行业可能意味着什么的确切数据却很少。更重要的是，科技和汽车分析师对苹果汽车的含义的看法略有不同。</blockquote></p><p> News of a potential Apple car surfaced in December. Those reports were taken seriously by both tech and car analysts because Apple has had car ambitions stretching back years—and because Apple is huge. The tech giant has a market capitalization roughly equal to the market cap of all car makers on the globe, combined. That includes the most valuable car company on the planet:Tesla(TSLA).</p><p><blockquote>去年12月，有关潜在苹果汽车的消息浮出水面。这些报告受到了科技和汽车分析师的重视，因为苹果多年来就有汽车雄心，而且苹果规模巨大。这家科技巨头的市值大致相当于全球所有汽车制造商的市值总和。其中包括全球最有价值的汽车公司：特斯拉（TSLA）。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai Motor(005380.Korea),Kia Motors(000270.Korea), as well as&nbsp;U.S. EVstart-up&nbsp;Canoo(GOEV), have all been&nbsp;tied&nbsp;to Apple in reports. Nissan is the latest car company to be linked. Nissan stock fell almost 3% Monday after Reuters reported Nissan’s denial it was working with Apple.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车（005380.韩国）、起亚汽车（000270.韩国）以及美国。电动汽车初创公司Canoo(GOEV)在报道中都与苹果有联系。日产是最新一家被联系的汽车公司。路透社报道日产否认与苹果合作后，日产股价周一下跌近3%。</blockquote></p><p> Apple, and the car companies, haven’t commented on Apple’s car plans. Apple wasn’t immediately available to comment on Nissan reports on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果和汽车公司尚未对苹果的汽车计划发表评论。周二，苹果没有立即对日产的报道发表评论。</blockquote></p><p> Outside of&nbsp;temporary impacts&nbsp;on car companies directly linked to Apple, car stocks aren’t really reacting to iCar news. Crying wolf is one reason: Nothing concrete has come from repeated speculation. And of course, an Apple car would be years away—another reason auto investors aren’t too concerned for the moment.</p><p><blockquote>除了对与苹果直接相关的汽车公司的暂时影响之外，汽车股并没有对iCar新闻做出真正的反应。狼来了是一个原因：反复的猜测没有任何具体的结果。当然，苹果汽车还需要数年时间——这是汽车投资者目前不太担心的另一个原因。</blockquote></p><p> That doesn’t mean an Apple car won’t matter, or that news of potential partnerships can be discounted. Wedbush analyst&nbsp;Dan Ives&nbsp;expects a formal announcement in 2021. “At this point it’s a matter of when, not if,&nbsp;Apple&nbsp;will enter the EV race over the next few years,” wrote Ives in a Monday research report. He assigns an 85% probability that Apple will make an announcement in three to six months and calls Hyundai and&nbsp;Volkswagen(VOW.Germany) his top two choices for an Apple partnership.</p><p><blockquote>这并不意味着苹果汽车不重要，或者潜在合作伙伴关系的消息可以打折扣。Wedbush分析师Dan Ives预计将于2021年正式宣布。Ives在周一的一份研究报告中写道：“在这一点上，苹果是否会在未来几年内进入电动汽车竞赛只是一个时间问题，而不是是否会。”他认为苹果有85%的可能性将在三到六个月内宣布这一消息，而评级现代和大众汽车(VOW.Germany)是他与苹果合作的两个首选。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai has its own&nbsp;modular EV platform. That’s one reason Ives likes Hyundai as a possibility, although other auto makers, including&nbsp;General Motors(GM), have&nbsp;similar approaches&nbsp;to electric-vehicle development. Volkswagen, for its part, has big EV ambitions. It is also a&nbsp;large shareholder&nbsp;of&nbsp;QuantumScape(QS), which is&nbsp;pioneering&nbsp;solid-state, lithium anode EV batteries. Those batteries promise lower cost, better safety, faster charging, and more range. Both things could make Volkswagen attractive to a partner.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车拥有自己的模块化电动汽车平台。这就是艾夫斯喜欢现代汽车的原因之一，尽管包括通用汽车(GM)在内的其他汽车制造商也有类似的电动汽车开发方法。就大众汽车而言，它有着远大的电动汽车雄心。它还是QuantumScape(QS)的大股东，该公司是固态锂阳极电动汽车电池的先驱。这些电池承诺成本更低、安全性更好、充电更快、续航里程更长。这两件事都可能使大众汽车对合作伙伴具有吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> Ives covers mainly technology stocks. He covers Apple, rating shares outperform and has a $175 price target for shares. He also covers Telsa stock, rating shares Hold with a $950 price target for shares. Bernstein analyst&nbsp;Toni Sacconaghi, covers both as well. He rates Apple stock Hold and has a $132 price target for shares. He is more bearish on Tesla though. He believes an Apple car would make it harder for Tesla to meet its volume growth goal of 50% a year on average for the next few years. “The automotive market has historically been highly fragmented, with strong regional brands and preferences,” wrote Sacconaghi in a recent research report. “It is uncertain to us that amid massive new competition and entry, the market will ultimately become more consolidated and/or have one outsized winner.”</p><p><blockquote>艾夫斯主要涵盖科技股。他关注苹果，将其股票评级为跑赢大盘，并将其股票目标价定为175美元。他还关注了Telsa股票，评级为持有，目标价为950美元。伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉(Toni Sacconaghi)也涵盖了这两者。他对苹果股票的评级为持有，目标价为132美元。不过，他更看跌特斯拉。他认为，苹果汽车将使特斯拉更难实现未来几年平均每年50%的销量增长目标。萨科纳吉在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“汽车市场历来高度分散，具有强大的区域品牌和偏好。”“我们不确定在大规模的新竞争和进入中，市场最终会变得更加整合和/或出现一个巨大的赢家。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s bad news for Tesla in his mind. He rates Tesla shares Sell and has a $180 price target for the stock, well below where shares are trading.</p><p><blockquote>在他看来，这对特斯拉来说是个坏消息。他将特斯拉股票评级为卖出，并将该股的目标价定为180美元，远低于该股的交易价格。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analyst&nbsp;Adam Jonas&nbsp;covers cars and not Apple. But he is bullish on Tesla stock, rating shares Buy with an $880 price target. An Apple car entry could speed EV penetration, which would benefit all EV makers. In addition, Tesla “can iterate industry-leading battery technology for another four or five years before Apple may be on the scene,” wrote Jonas in a recent research report. “But at some point, today’s EV players must share the sandbox.”</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师Adam Jonas关注的是汽车，而不是苹果。但他看好特斯拉股票，给予该股买入评级，目标价为880美元。苹果汽车的进入可能会加速电动汽车的渗透，这将使所有电动汽车制造商受益。此外，Jonas在最近的一份研究报告中写道，特斯拉“在苹果可能出现之前，还可以再迭代四五年行业领先的电池技术”。“但在某些时候，今天的电动汽车玩家必须共享沙盒。”</blockquote></p><p> More EV players, however, aren’t enough to shake his confidence in Tesla stock. In addition to Tesla, Jonas recommends stock in GM and supplier&nbsp;Aptiv(APTV) to get exposure to the&nbsp;EV theme.</p><p><blockquote>然而，更多的电动汽车玩家并不足以动摇他对特斯拉股票的信心。除了特斯拉之外，Jonas还推荐通用汽车和供应商Aptiv(APTV)的股票来投资电动汽车主题。</blockquote></p><p> RBC analyst Joe Spak also covers car stocks. He, like Jonas, rates GM and Aptiv stock Buy but rates Tesla stock Hold. The emergence of an Apple car, for Spak, highlights the need for car makers to adapt at faster rates. “Otherwise they could get left behind, whether it’s by Apple or someone else,” wrote Spak in a recent research report.</p><p><blockquote>加拿大皇家银行分析师乔·斯帕克也关注汽车股。与Jonas一样，他将通用汽车和Aptiv股票评级为买入，但将特斯拉股票评级为持有。对于斯帕克来说，苹果汽车的出现凸显了汽车制造商以更快的速度适应的必要性。斯帕克在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“否则他们可能会被抛在后面，无论是被苹果还是其他人。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Overall, Wall Street appears to believe few things about the iCar: It will be a premium self-driving product, and will be built by an existing auto maker. It is good news for Apple stock, but it might not be that disruptive to the existing industry—initial volumes will be small, and it will boost consumer interest in EVs. What’s more, news of an Apple car will drive incumbents to improve. Time will tell if that turns out to be how the industry develops.</p><p><blockquote>总体而言，华尔街似乎不太相信iCar：它将是一款优质的自动驾驶产品，并将由现有汽车制造商制造。这对苹果股票来说是个好消息，但对现有行业来说可能不会有那么大的颠覆性——初始销量会很小，但会提高消费者对电动汽车的兴趣。更重要的是，苹果汽车的消息将推动现有汽车的改进。时间会证明这是否是该行业的发展方式。</blockquote></p><p> Apple car news, again, doesn’t appear to be hitting stocks all that much. Tesla stock is down 2.4% on Tuesday. Apple stock is down 1.6%. The&nbsp;S&amp;P 500,for comparison, is down about 0.1% and the&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;is up about 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>苹果汽车新闻似乎并没有对股市造成太大影响。特斯拉股价周二下跌2.4%。苹果股价下跌1.6%。相比之下，标准普尔500指数下跌约0.1%，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约0.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple iCar Speculation Continues. How Tech and Auto Analysts See the Car.<blockquote>苹果iCar猜测仍在继续。技术和汽车分析师如何看待汽车。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-17 11:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car&nbsp;produced by Apple&nbsp;just won’t die.</p><p><blockquote>关于苹果生产的全电动自动驾驶汽车的猜测不会消失。</blockquote></p><p> Now Japanese car maker&nbsp;Nissan Motor(ticker: 7201.Japan) has denied reports that it is in talks to be the builder of an Apple-branded vehicle. The iCar has resulted in a lot of Wall Street&nbsp;research reports, but few hard numbers about what an&nbsp;Apple(AAPL) entry might mean for the global car business. What’s more, tech and car analysts have slightly different takes on what the Apple car means.</p><p><blockquote>现在，日本汽车制造商日产汽车（股票代码：7201.Japan）否认了有关其正在洽谈成为苹果品牌汽车制造商的报道。iCar引发了许多华尔街研究报告，但关于苹果(AAPL)的加入对全球汽车行业可能意味着什么的确切数据却很少。更重要的是，科技和汽车分析师对苹果汽车的含义的看法略有不同。</blockquote></p><p> News of a potential Apple car surfaced in December. Those reports were taken seriously by both tech and car analysts because Apple has had car ambitions stretching back years—and because Apple is huge. The tech giant has a market capitalization roughly equal to the market cap of all car makers on the globe, combined. That includes the most valuable car company on the planet:Tesla(TSLA).</p><p><blockquote>去年12月，有关潜在苹果汽车的消息浮出水面。这些报告受到了科技和汽车分析师的重视，因为苹果多年来就有汽车雄心，而且苹果规模巨大。这家科技巨头的市值大致相当于全球所有汽车制造商的市值总和。其中包括全球最有价值的汽车公司：特斯拉（TSLA）。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai Motor(005380.Korea),Kia Motors(000270.Korea), as well as&nbsp;U.S. EVstart-up&nbsp;Canoo(GOEV), have all been&nbsp;tied&nbsp;to Apple in reports. Nissan is the latest car company to be linked. Nissan stock fell almost 3% Monday after Reuters reported Nissan’s denial it was working with Apple.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车（005380.韩国）、起亚汽车（000270.韩国）以及美国。电动汽车初创公司Canoo(GOEV)在报道中都与苹果有联系。日产是最新一家被联系的汽车公司。路透社报道日产否认与苹果合作后，日产股价周一下跌近3%。</blockquote></p><p> Apple, and the car companies, haven’t commented on Apple’s car plans. Apple wasn’t immediately available to comment on Nissan reports on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果和汽车公司尚未对苹果的汽车计划发表评论。周二，苹果没有立即对日产的报道发表评论。</blockquote></p><p> Outside of&nbsp;temporary impacts&nbsp;on car companies directly linked to Apple, car stocks aren’t really reacting to iCar news. Crying wolf is one reason: Nothing concrete has come from repeated speculation. And of course, an Apple car would be years away—another reason auto investors aren’t too concerned for the moment.</p><p><blockquote>除了对与苹果直接相关的汽车公司的暂时影响之外，汽车股并没有对iCar新闻做出真正的反应。狼来了是一个原因：反复的猜测没有任何具体的结果。当然，苹果汽车还需要数年时间——这是汽车投资者目前不太担心的另一个原因。</blockquote></p><p> That doesn’t mean an Apple car won’t matter, or that news of potential partnerships can be discounted. Wedbush analyst&nbsp;Dan Ives&nbsp;expects a formal announcement in 2021. “At this point it’s a matter of when, not if,&nbsp;Apple&nbsp;will enter the EV race over the next few years,” wrote Ives in a Monday research report. He assigns an 85% probability that Apple will make an announcement in three to six months and calls Hyundai and&nbsp;Volkswagen(VOW.Germany) his top two choices for an Apple partnership.</p><p><blockquote>这并不意味着苹果汽车不重要，或者潜在合作伙伴关系的消息可以打折扣。Wedbush分析师Dan Ives预计将于2021年正式宣布。Ives在周一的一份研究报告中写道：“在这一点上，苹果是否会在未来几年内进入电动汽车竞赛只是一个时间问题，而不是是否会。”他认为苹果有85%的可能性将在三到六个月内宣布这一消息，而评级现代和大众汽车(VOW.Germany)是他与苹果合作的两个首选。</blockquote></p><p> Hyundai has its own&nbsp;modular EV platform. That’s one reason Ives likes Hyundai as a possibility, although other auto makers, including&nbsp;General Motors(GM), have&nbsp;similar approaches&nbsp;to electric-vehicle development. Volkswagen, for its part, has big EV ambitions. It is also a&nbsp;large shareholder&nbsp;of&nbsp;QuantumScape(QS), which is&nbsp;pioneering&nbsp;solid-state, lithium anode EV batteries. Those batteries promise lower cost, better safety, faster charging, and more range. Both things could make Volkswagen attractive to a partner.</p><p><blockquote>现代汽车拥有自己的模块化电动汽车平台。这就是艾夫斯喜欢现代汽车的原因之一，尽管包括通用汽车(GM)在内的其他汽车制造商也有类似的电动汽车开发方法。就大众汽车而言，它有着远大的电动汽车雄心。它还是QuantumScape(QS)的大股东，该公司是固态锂阳极电动汽车电池的先驱。这些电池承诺成本更低、安全性更好、充电更快、续航里程更长。这两件事都可能使大众汽车对合作伙伴具有吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> Ives covers mainly technology stocks. He covers Apple, rating shares outperform and has a $175 price target for shares. He also covers Telsa stock, rating shares Hold with a $950 price target for shares. Bernstein analyst&nbsp;Toni Sacconaghi, covers both as well. He rates Apple stock Hold and has a $132 price target for shares. He is more bearish on Tesla though. He believes an Apple car would make it harder for Tesla to meet its volume growth goal of 50% a year on average for the next few years. “The automotive market has historically been highly fragmented, with strong regional brands and preferences,” wrote Sacconaghi in a recent research report. “It is uncertain to us that amid massive new competition and entry, the market will ultimately become more consolidated and/or have one outsized winner.”</p><p><blockquote>艾夫斯主要涵盖科技股。他关注苹果，将其股票评级为跑赢大盘，并将其股票目标价定为175美元。他还关注了Telsa股票，评级为持有，目标价为950美元。伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉(Toni Sacconaghi)也涵盖了这两者。他对苹果股票的评级为持有，目标价为132美元。不过，他更看跌特斯拉。他认为，苹果汽车将使特斯拉更难实现未来几年平均每年50%的销量增长目标。萨科纳吉在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“汽车市场历来高度分散，具有强大的区域品牌和偏好。”“我们不确定在大规模的新竞争和进入中，市场最终会变得更加整合和/或出现一个巨大的赢家。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s bad news for Tesla in his mind. He rates Tesla shares Sell and has a $180 price target for the stock, well below where shares are trading.</p><p><blockquote>在他看来，这对特斯拉来说是个坏消息。他将特斯拉股票评级为卖出，并将该股的目标价定为180美元，远低于该股的交易价格。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analyst&nbsp;Adam Jonas&nbsp;covers cars and not Apple. But he is bullish on Tesla stock, rating shares Buy with an $880 price target. An Apple car entry could speed EV penetration, which would benefit all EV makers. In addition, Tesla “can iterate industry-leading battery technology for another four or five years before Apple may be on the scene,” wrote Jonas in a recent research report. “But at some point, today’s EV players must share the sandbox.”</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师Adam Jonas关注的是汽车，而不是苹果。但他看好特斯拉股票，给予该股买入评级，目标价为880美元。苹果汽车的进入可能会加速电动汽车的渗透，这将使所有电动汽车制造商受益。此外，Jonas在最近的一份研究报告中写道，特斯拉“在苹果可能出现之前，还可以再迭代四五年行业领先的电池技术”。“但在某些时候，今天的电动汽车玩家必须共享沙盒。”</blockquote></p><p> More EV players, however, aren’t enough to shake his confidence in Tesla stock. In addition to Tesla, Jonas recommends stock in GM and supplier&nbsp;Aptiv(APTV) to get exposure to the&nbsp;EV theme.</p><p><blockquote>然而，更多的电动汽车玩家并不足以动摇他对特斯拉股票的信心。除了特斯拉之外，Jonas还推荐通用汽车和供应商Aptiv(APTV)的股票来投资电动汽车主题。</blockquote></p><p> RBC analyst Joe Spak also covers car stocks. He, like Jonas, rates GM and Aptiv stock Buy but rates Tesla stock Hold. The emergence of an Apple car, for Spak, highlights the need for car makers to adapt at faster rates. “Otherwise they could get left behind, whether it’s by Apple or someone else,” wrote Spak in a recent research report.</p><p><blockquote>加拿大皇家银行分析师乔·斯帕克也关注汽车股。与Jonas一样，他将通用汽车和Aptiv股票评级为买入，但将特斯拉股票评级为持有。对于斯帕克来说，苹果汽车的出现凸显了汽车制造商以更快的速度适应的必要性。斯帕克在最近的一份研究报告中写道：“否则他们可能会被抛在后面，无论是被苹果还是其他人。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Overall, Wall Street appears to believe few things about the iCar: It will be a premium self-driving product, and will be built by an existing auto maker. It is good news for Apple stock, but it might not be that disruptive to the existing industry—initial volumes will be small, and it will boost consumer interest in EVs. What’s more, news of an Apple car will drive incumbents to improve. Time will tell if that turns out to be how the industry develops.</p><p><blockquote>总体而言，华尔街似乎不太相信iCar：它将是一款优质的自动驾驶产品，并将由现有汽车制造商制造。这对苹果股票来说是个好消息，但对现有行业来说可能不会有那么大的颠覆性——初始销量会很小，但会提高消费者对电动汽车的兴趣。更重要的是，苹果汽车的消息将推动现有汽车的改进。时间会证明这是否是该行业的发展方式。</blockquote></p><p> Apple car news, again, doesn’t appear to be hitting stocks all that much. Tesla stock is down 2.4% on Tuesday. Apple stock is down 1.6%. The&nbsp;S&amp;P 500,for comparison, is down about 0.1% and the&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;is up about 0.2%.</p><p><blockquote>苹果汽车新闻似乎并没有对股市造成太大影响。特斯拉股价周二下跌2.4%。苹果股价下跌1.6%。相比之下，标准普尔500指数下跌约0.1%，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨约0.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-icar-ev-speculation-nissan-tesla-51613492754?mod=hp_LEAD_4\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","TSLA":"特斯拉","GM":"通用汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-icar-ev-speculation-nissan-tesla-51613492754?mod=hp_LEAD_4","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106575642","content_text":"Speculation about an all-electric, self-driving car produced by Apple just won’t die.\nNow Japanese car maker Nissan Motor(ticker: 7201.Japan) has denied reports that it is in talks to be the builder of an Apple-branded vehicle. The iCar has resulted in a lot of Wall Street research reports, but few hard numbers about what an Apple(AAPL) entry might mean for the global car business. What’s more, tech and car analysts have slightly different takes on what the Apple car means.\nNews of a potential Apple car surfaced in December. Those reports were taken seriously by both tech and car analysts because Apple has had car ambitions stretching back years—and because Apple is huge. The tech giant has a market capitalization roughly equal to the market cap of all car makers on the globe, combined. That includes the most valuable car company on the planet:Tesla(TSLA).\nHyundai Motor(005380.Korea),Kia Motors(000270.Korea), as well as U.S. EVstart-up Canoo(GOEV), have all been tied to Apple in reports. Nissan is the latest car company to be linked. Nissan stock fell almost 3% Monday after Reuters reported Nissan’s denial it was working with Apple.\nApple, and the car companies, haven’t commented on Apple’s car plans. Apple wasn’t immediately available to comment on Nissan reports on Tuesday.\nOutside of temporary impacts on car companies directly linked to Apple, car stocks aren’t really reacting to iCar news. Crying wolf is one reason: Nothing concrete has come from repeated speculation. And of course, an Apple car would be years away—another reason auto investors aren’t too concerned for the moment.\nThat doesn’t mean an Apple car won’t matter, or that news of potential partnerships can be discounted. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives expects a formal announcement in 2021. “At this point it’s a matter of when, not if, Apple will enter the EV race over the next few years,” wrote Ives in a Monday research report. He assigns an 85% probability that Apple will make an announcement in three to six months and calls Hyundai and Volkswagen(VOW.Germany) his top two choices for an Apple partnership.\nHyundai has its own modular EV platform. That’s one reason Ives likes Hyundai as a possibility, although other auto makers, including General Motors(GM), have similar approaches to electric-vehicle development. Volkswagen, for its part, has big EV ambitions. It is also a large shareholder of QuantumScape(QS), which is pioneering solid-state, lithium anode EV batteries. Those batteries promise lower cost, better safety, faster charging, and more range. Both things could make Volkswagen attractive to a partner.\nIves covers mainly technology stocks. He covers Apple, rating shares outperform and has a $175 price target for shares. He also covers Telsa stock, rating shares Hold with a $950 price target for shares. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, covers both as well. He rates Apple stock Hold and has a $132 price target for shares. He is more bearish on Tesla though. He believes an Apple car would make it harder for Tesla to meet its volume growth goal of 50% a year on average for the next few years. “The automotive market has historically been highly fragmented, with strong regional brands and preferences,” wrote Sacconaghi in a recent research report. “It is uncertain to us that amid massive new competition and entry, the market will ultimately become more consolidated and/or have one outsized winner.”\nThat’s bad news for Tesla in his mind. He rates Tesla shares Sell and has a $180 price target for the stock, well below where shares are trading.\nMorgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas covers cars and not Apple. But he is bullish on Tesla stock, rating shares Buy with an $880 price target. An Apple car entry could speed EV penetration, which would benefit all EV makers. In addition, Tesla “can iterate industry-leading battery technology for another four or five years before Apple may be on the scene,” wrote Jonas in a recent research report. “But at some point, today’s EV players must share the sandbox.”\nMore EV players, however, aren’t enough to shake his confidence in Tesla stock. In addition to Tesla, Jonas recommends stock in GM and supplier Aptiv(APTV) to get exposure to the EV theme.\nRBC analyst Joe Spak also covers car stocks. He, like Jonas, rates GM and Aptiv stock Buy but rates Tesla stock Hold. The emergence of an Apple car, for Spak, highlights the need for car makers to adapt at faster rates. “Otherwise they could get left behind, whether it’s by Apple or someone else,” wrote Spak in a recent research report.\nOverall, Wall Street appears to believe few things about the iCar: It will be a premium self-driving product, and will be built by an existing auto maker. It is good news for Apple stock, but it might not be that disruptive to the existing industry—initial volumes will be small, and it will boost consumer interest in EVs. What’s more, news of an Apple car will drive incumbents to improve. Time will tell if that turns out to be how the industry develops.\nApple car news, again, doesn’t appear to be hitting stocks all that much. Tesla stock is down 2.4% on Tuesday. Apple stock is down 1.6%. The S&P 500,for comparison, is down about 0.1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up about 0.2%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"GM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":382675204,"gmtCreate":1613447082308,"gmtModify":1634553649455,"author":{"id":"3574863478252201","authorId":"3574863478252201","name":"Saltae","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707c90db06b44c55897865aea5702556","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574863478252201","idStr":"3574863478252201"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/382675204","repostId":"2111004392","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2400,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":315853016,"gmtCreate":1612234114635,"gmtModify":1703759105262,"author":{"id":"3574863478252201","authorId":"3574863478252201","name":"Saltae","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707c90db06b44c55897865aea5702556","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574863478252201","idStr":"3574863478252201"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"💎🖐","listText":"💎🖐","text":"💎🖐","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/315853016","repostId":"1183603122","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1465,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3527667803686145","authorId":"3527667803686145","name":"社区成长助手","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b7c7106b5c0c8b0037faa67439d898f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3527667803686145","idStr":"3527667803686145"},"content":"终于等到了您的初发帖[比心][比心]发帖时关联相关股票或者相关话题，可以获得更多曝光哦～如果您想创作优质文章，请查看老虎社区创作指引","text":"终于等到了您的初发帖[比心][比心]发帖时关联相关股票或者相关话题，可以获得更多曝光哦～如果您想创作优质文章，请查看老虎社区创作指引","html":"终于等到了您的初发帖[比心][比心]发帖时关联相关股票或者相关话题，可以获得更多曝光哦～如果您想创作优质文章，请查看老虎社区创作指引"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"following","isTTM":false}