个人中心 - 老虎社区

Linggz_

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 12帖子 · 12
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-08
  Ok
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,507 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-07
  Ok
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,242 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-06
  Ok
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,018 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-06
  Good
  Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote>
  When President Obama ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in thei
  Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote>
  3,136 1
  3
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-05
  Ok
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,455 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-04
  Nice
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  3,213 1
  4
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-04
  Nice
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,487 1
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-08-04
  Nice
  7 Dividend Growth Stocks For August 2021<blockquote>2021年8月7只股息增长股票</blockquote>
  These companies are delivering exceptional earnings and dividend growth, and their stocks are tradin
  7 Dividend Growth Stocks For August 2021<blockquote>2021年8月7只股息增长股票</blockquote>
  1,342 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-06-29
  Ok
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,755 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- Linggz_Linggz_
  ·2021-06-27
  X
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  1,214 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
暂无粉丝

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3575811912571873","uuid":"3575811912571873","gmtCreate":1612789194150,"gmtModify":1623767948323,"name":"Linggz_","pinyin":"linggzlinggz","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":1,"tweetSize":12,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.09.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":891701555,"gmtCreate":1628421919777,"gmtModify":1633747215841,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891701555","repostId":"1143051031","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1507,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891904611,"gmtCreate":1628313494233,"gmtModify":1633751713383,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891904611","repostId":"2157649395","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2242,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893041495,"gmtCreate":1628224213417,"gmtModify":1633752430804,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893041495","repostId":"1196684672","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2018,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893041322,"gmtCreate":1628224183766,"gmtModify":1633752431046,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893041322","repostId":"1193751771","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193751771","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628222237,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1193751771?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 11:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193751771","media":"yahoo finance","summary":"When President Obama ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in thei","content":"<p>When President Obama&nbsp;ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and&nbsp;locked in the new rules, with no industry input.</p><p><blockquote>当奥巴马总统在2012年提高燃油经济性标准时，一些汽车制造商悄悄地提高了轮胎。到2025年，新规则将燃油效率要求提高了近一倍，迫使昂贵的新技术迅速采用。如果技术成熟得不够快，2018年的中途审查本应提供一个出口。但当唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)在2016年赢得总统大选时，奥巴马提前了最后期限并锁定了新规则，没有行业投入。</blockquote></p><p> The shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency,&nbsp;Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump&nbsp;sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.</p><p><blockquote>被回避的汽车行业向特朗普寻求救济，并得到了救济。就任总统两个月后，特朗普重新启动了中途审查，2020年特朗普大幅降低了2025年的目标。特朗普还试图阻止加州和其他24个州设定高于联邦水平的里程标准。这导致了该行业的分裂，一些汽车制造商站在特朗普一边，另一些则站在加州一边。</blockquote></p><p> President Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.</p><p><blockquote>拜登总统现在正在撤销特朗普的撤销，并再次推动燃油经济性的大幅提高。但他在汽车制造商的更多合作下做到了这一点，这也是奥巴马没有的优势：电动汽车比九年前走得更远，每个主要汽车制造商都在将电动汽车推向市场。现在，这使得汽车制造商更容易削减其车队的排放，同时具有讽刺意味的是，这使得政府能够软化仍使用汽油的车辆的效率目标。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>Automakers are on board</b></h3> A new Biden executive order sets a target for up to&nbsp;50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>汽车制造商纷纷加入</b></h3>拜登的一项新行政命令设定了到2030年销售的所有新车中高达50%实现电气化的目标，这意味着它们要么是全插电式汽车，要么是兼有燃气发动机和电动机的混合动力汽车，要么是氢动力汽车。请注意，这是一个“目标”，而不是一个需求。拜登的目标与汽车制造商已经宣布的目标基本一致，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>目标是到2035年全面淘汰汽油和柴油动力汽车。达不到目标的惩罚？什么都没有。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1af6cf6099a51f8b7b2be1a35f29a84\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>A sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>2021年7月21日星期三上午，宾夕法尼亚州斯普林镇希尔顿酒店Homewood Suites的ChargePoint车辆(EV)充电站上写着“仅限电动汽车充电”的标志。（摄影：Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p> Biden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump&nbsp;lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that&nbsp;would require a 3.7% annual improvement.</p><p><blockquote>拜登还将启动将汽油动力汽车燃油经济性标准提高到特朗普水平之上的进程。奥巴马的规定要求燃油经济性每年提高约5%。特朗普将这一比例下调至1.5%。据报道，拜登将提出新规则，要求每年提高3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> It will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">Bayerische Motoren Werke AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">Honda</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">Volkswagen AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">Volvo AB</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> and Jeep-Chrysler parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">Stellantis NV</a>—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.</p><p><blockquote>制定管理燃油经济性提高的联邦法规需要时间，但汽车行业似乎不太可能在幕后试图淡化这一点，而不是在之前的燃油经济性提高之争中。七家汽车制造商——<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">巴伐利亚汽车厂股份公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">本田</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">大众汽车公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">沃尔沃AB</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>和吉普-克莱斯勒母公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">斯特兰蒂斯公司</a>-提供了白宫在宣布拜登新的电动汽车目标时分发的支持声明。通用汽车、福特和Stellantis异口同声地表示：“我们期待与拜登政府合作……制定能够实现这些雄心勃勃目标的政策。”汽车制造商联手赞扬新的联邦法规的情况并不常见。</blockquote></p><p> There’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.</p><p><blockquote>对于汽车制造商来说，这是一个巨大的甜头：数十亿美元的联邦支出用于支持电动汽车的开发。国会正在通过的两党基础设施法案包括75亿美元用于帮助建设电动汽车充电站。拜登希望在清洁汽车税收抵免、电池厂补贴、校车电气化和其他举措上增加超过1500亿美元的支出。国会可能不会提供所有这些支出，但即使是其中的一部分也将是支持电动汽车开发的意外之财，如果没有政府的巨额援助，电动汽车开发的风险会大得多。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb3cdc7ae94763d9e64dee84b0bcdfeb\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>The<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>加利福尼亚州凯特曼市的超级充电站是加利福尼亚州圣华金河谷的电动汽车充电站。照片拍摄于2021年7月12日。（卡罗琳·科尔/洛杉矶时报，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p></p><p> One sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.</p><p><blockquote>拜登政府和汽车行业之间关系日益密切的一个迹象是环保组织的批评，他们希望拜登走得更远。一些团体在称赞拜登即将推翻特朗普规则的同时，表示他行动太慢。倡导组织Evergreen Action在一份声明中表示：“设定到2030年电动汽车销量占40%-50%的远大目标是不够的。”“拜登政府应该……到2030年实现100%的电动汽车销量。”汽油动力汽车是濒危物种，只是灭绝何时发生的问题。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy automakers like Biden more than Obama<blockquote>为什么汽车制造商比奥巴马更喜欢拜登</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">yahoo finance</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-06 11:57</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>When President Obama&nbsp;ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and&nbsp;locked in the new rules, with no industry input.</p><p><blockquote>当奥巴马总统在2012年提高燃油经济性标准时，一些汽车制造商悄悄地提高了轮胎。到2025年，新规则将燃油效率要求提高了近一倍，迫使昂贵的新技术迅速采用。如果技术成熟得不够快，2018年的中途审查本应提供一个出口。但当唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)在2016年赢得总统大选时，奥巴马提前了最后期限并锁定了新规则，没有行业投入。</blockquote></p><p> The shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency,&nbsp;Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump&nbsp;sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.</p><p><blockquote>被回避的汽车行业向特朗普寻求救济，并得到了救济。就任总统两个月后，特朗普重新启动了中途审查，2020年特朗普大幅降低了2025年的目标。特朗普还试图阻止加州和其他24个州设定高于联邦水平的里程标准。这导致了该行业的分裂，一些汽车制造商站在特朗普一边，另一些则站在加州一边。</blockquote></p><p> President Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.</p><p><blockquote>拜登总统现在正在撤销特朗普的撤销，并再次推动燃油经济性的大幅提高。但他在汽车制造商的更多合作下做到了这一点，这也是奥巴马没有的优势：电动汽车比九年前走得更远，每个主要汽车制造商都在将电动汽车推向市场。现在，这使得汽车制造商更容易削减其车队的排放，同时具有讽刺意味的是，这使得政府能够软化仍使用汽油的车辆的效率目标。</blockquote></p><p> <h3><b>Automakers are on board</b></h3> A new Biden executive order sets a target for up to&nbsp;50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.</p><p><blockquote><h3><b>汽车制造商纷纷加入</b></h3>拜登的一项新行政命令设定了到2030年销售的所有新车中高达50%实现电气化的目标，这意味着它们要么是全插电式汽车，要么是兼有燃气发动机和电动机的混合动力汽车，要么是氢动力汽车。请注意，这是一个“目标”，而不是一个需求。拜登的目标与汽车制造商已经宣布的目标基本一致，例如<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>目标是到2035年全面淘汰汽油和柴油动力汽车。达不到目标的惩罚？什么都没有。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1af6cf6099a51f8b7b2be1a35f29a84\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>A sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>2021年7月21日星期三上午，宾夕法尼亚州斯普林镇希尔顿酒店Homewood Suites的ChargePoint车辆(EV)充电站上写着“仅限电动汽车充电”的标志。（摄影：Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p> Biden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump&nbsp;lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that&nbsp;would require a 3.7% annual improvement.</p><p><blockquote>拜登还将启动将汽油动力汽车燃油经济性标准提高到特朗普水平之上的进程。奥巴马的规定要求燃油经济性每年提高约5%。特朗普将这一比例下调至1.5%。据报道，拜登将提出新规则，要求每年提高3.7%。</blockquote></p><p> It will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">Bayerische Motoren Werke AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">Honda</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">Volkswagen AG</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">Volvo AB</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> and Jeep-Chrysler parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">Stellantis NV</a>—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.</p><p><blockquote>制定管理燃油经济性提高的联邦法规需要时间，但汽车行业似乎不太可能在幕后试图淡化这一点，而不是在之前的燃油经济性提高之争中。七家汽车制造商——<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BMWYY\">巴伐利亚汽车厂股份公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HMC\">本田</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLKAF\">大众汽车公司</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VLVLY\">沃尔沃AB</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>和吉普-克莱斯勒母公司<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">斯特兰蒂斯公司</a>-提供了白宫在宣布拜登新的电动汽车目标时分发的支持声明。通用汽车、福特和Stellantis异口同声地表示：“我们期待与拜登政府合作……制定能够实现这些雄心勃勃目标的政策。”汽车制造商联手赞扬新的联邦法规的情况并不常见。</blockquote></p><p> There’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.</p><p><blockquote>对于汽车制造商来说，这是一个巨大的甜头：数十亿美元的联邦支出用于支持电动汽车的开发。国会正在通过的两党基础设施法案包括75亿美元用于帮助建设电动汽车充电站。拜登希望在清洁汽车税收抵免、电池厂补贴、校车电气化和其他举措上增加超过1500亿美元的支出。国会可能不会提供所有这些支出，但即使是其中的一部分也将是支持电动汽车开发的意外之财，如果没有政府的巨额援助，电动汽车开发的风险会大得多。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb3cdc7ae94763d9e64dee84b0bcdfeb\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><i>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)</i></p><p><blockquote><i>The<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>加利福尼亚州凯特曼市的超级充电站是加利福尼亚州圣华金河谷的电动汽车充电站。照片拍摄于2021年7月12日。（卡罗琳·科尔/洛杉矶时报，盖蒂图片社）</i></blockquote></p><p></p><p> One sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.</p><p><blockquote>拜登政府和汽车行业之间关系日益密切的一个迹象是环保组织的批评，他们希望拜登走得更远。一些团体在称赞拜登即将推翻特朗普规则的同时，表示他行动太慢。倡导组织Evergreen Action在一份声明中表示：“设定到2030年电动汽车销量占40%-50%的远大目标是不够的。”“拜登政府应该……到2030年实现100%的电动汽车销量。”汽油动力汽车是濒危物种，只是灭绝何时发生的问题。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-automakers-like-biden-more-than-obama-154815643.html\">yahoo finance</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","GM":"通用汽车"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-automakers-like-biden-more-than-obama-154815643.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193751771","content_text":"When President Obama ratcheted up fuel economy standards in 2012, some carmakers quietly dug in their tires. The new rules nearly doubled fuel-efficiency requirements by 2025, forcing the rapid adoption of expensive new technology. A midway review in 2018 was supposed to provide an off-ramp if the technology wasn’t maturing quickly enough. But when Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, Obama moved up the deadline and locked in the new rules, with no industry input.\nThe shunned auto industry asked Trump for relief, and got it. Two months into his presidency, Trump reopened the midway review, and in 2020 Trump sharply reduced the 2025 target. Trump also tried to stop California and two dozen other states from setting their own mileage standards higher than federal levels. That split the industry, assome carmakers sided with Trump and others with California.\nPresident Biden is now undoing Trump’s undoing, and once again pushing for sharp increases in fuel economy. But he’s doing it with much more cooperation from automakers, and an advantage Obama didn’t have: Electric vehicles are much further along than they were nine years ago, with every major automaker rushing EVs to market. That now makes it much easier for automakers to slash emissions across their fleets, while, ironically, allowing the government to soften efficiency targets for vehicles that still run on gasoline.\nAutomakers are on board\nA new Biden executive order sets a target for up to 50% of all new vehicles sold by 2030 being electrified, which means they will either be full plug-ins, hybrids with both a gas engine and an electric motor, or hydrogen-powered cars. Notice that it’s a “target,” not a requirement. Biden’s target is largely in line with goals automakers have already announced, such as General Motors' aim to fully phase out gas- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The penalty for failing to meet the target? Nada.\nA sign that reads \"EV Charging Only\" at a ChargePoint vehicle (EV) charging station at the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel in Spring Township, PA Wednesday morning July 21, 2021. (Photo by Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images)\nBiden will also start the process of raising fuel-economy standards for gas-powered cars above the Trump levels. The Obama rules required fuel-economy improvements of about 5% per year. Trump lowered that to 1.5%. Biden will reportedly propose new rules that would require a 3.7% annual improvement.\nIt will take time to formulate the federal regulation governing increases in fuel economy, but the auto industry seems less likely to try watering that down behind the scenes than it has during previous battles over fuel-economy increases. Seven automakers—Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, Honda, Volkswagen AG, Volvo AB, General Motors, Ford and Jeep-Chrysler parent Stellantis NV—provided supporting statements the White House distributed when it announced Biden’s new EV target. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration … to enact policies that will enable these ambitious objectives,” GM, Ford and Stellantis said in unison. It’s not often automakers join hands to praise new federal regulations.\nThere’s a huge sweetener for automakers: Billions of dollars in federal spending to support EV development. The bipartisan infrastructure bill working through Congress includes $7.5 billion to help build EV charging stations. Biden wants more than $150 billion in additional spending on clean-car tax credits, subsidies for battery plants, school-bus electrification and other initiatives. Congress probably won’t provide all that spending, but even a portion of it would be a windfall supporting EV development that would be much risker without a huge government assist.\nThe Tesla Motors Supercharger Station in Kettleman City, California is an EV charging station for electric cars in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Photograph taken on July 12, 2021. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)\nOne sign of the coziness developing between the Biden administration and the auto industry is criticism from environmental groups hoping Biden would go further. While applauding Biden’s pending reversal of the Trump rules, some groups say he’s moving too slowly. “Setting an aspirational target of 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030 is simply not enough,” the advocacy group Evergreen Action said in a statement. “The Biden administration should … drive toward 100% EV sales by 2030.” The gas-powered car is an endangered species, it's just a matter of when the extinction occurs.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"GM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3136,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890224690,"gmtCreate":1628121055810,"gmtModify":1633753475938,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890224690","repostId":"2157483930","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1455,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807706440,"gmtCreate":1628054790080,"gmtModify":1633753982986,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"&nbsp;Nice","listText":"&nbsp;Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807706440","repostId":"2156412186","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3213,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807706598,"gmtCreate":1628054777314,"gmtModify":1633753983108,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807706598","repostId":"1124524228","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2487,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807706656,"gmtCreate":1628054763475,"gmtModify":1633753983330,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/807706656","repostId":"1122614377","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1122614377","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628047303,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1122614377?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 11:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"7 Dividend Growth Stocks For August 2021<blockquote>2021年8月7只股息增长股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122614377","media":"TheStreet","summary":"These companies are delivering exceptional earnings and dividend growth, and their stocks are tradin","content":"<p>These companies are delivering exceptional earnings and dividend growth, and their stocks are trading at reasonable valuations.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司实现了卓越的盈利和股息增长，并且其股票的估值合理。</blockquote></p><p> Last month I started a new series that will rank selections ofDividend Radarstocks and present the seven top-ranked stocks for consideration. Dividend Radar tracks stocks trading on U.S. exchanges with dividend increase streaks of at least five years.</p><p><blockquote>上个月，我开始了一个新系列，将对股息雷达股票的选择进行排名，并提出排名靠前的七只股票供考虑。股息雷达跟踪在美国交易所交易的股息至少五年连续增加的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Each month, I’ll consider different screens to narrow down the more than 750 Dividend Radar stocks. Screens will focus on various aspects of dividend growth investing, such as dividend yield, dividend growth rate, and stock valuation.</p><p><blockquote>每个月，我都会考虑不同的屏幕来缩小750多只股息雷达股票的范围。屏幕将重点关注股息增长投资的各个方面，例如股息收益率、股息增长率和股票估值。</blockquote></p><p> This month, I screened for stocks of companies that have delivered exceptional earnings growth over the last ten years. Additionally, I screened for stocks trading at reasonable valuations and required a 5-year yield on cost (YoC) of at least 3%.</p><p><blockquote>本月，我筛选了过去十年中盈利增长异常的公司股票。此外，我筛选了估值合理的股票，并要求5年期成本收益率(YoC)至少为3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Screening and Ranking</b></p><p><blockquote><b>筛选和排名</b></blockquote></p><p> Earnings and earnings growth are the foundation of dividends and dividend growth. Companies could use debt to pay dividends, such as when earnings temporarily are insufficient to cover dividend payouts. Eventually, though, that debt will have to be repaid from earnings, which, presumably and hopefully, would be sufficient to pay off debt and pay the dividend.</p><p><blockquote>盈利和盈利增长是股息和股息增长的基础。公司可以利用债务来支付股息，例如当收益暂时不足以支付股息支付时。不过，最终，这笔债务将不得不从收益中偿还，这大概也有希望足以偿还债务和支付股息。</blockquote></p><p> Portfolio Insight&nbsp;provides earnings and earnings growth data that we can monitor to get a sense of a company’s ability to continue paying and increasing dividends. For this month’s article, I considered Non-GAAP EPS compound annual growth rates [CAGRs] for different time frames. Here’s the specific screening formula:</p><p><blockquote>Portfolio Insight提供盈利和盈利增长数据，我们可以监控这些数据，以了解公司继续支付和增加股息的能力。在本月的文章中，我考虑了不同时间范围内的非GAAP每股收益复合年增长率[CAGR]。下面是具体的筛选公式：</blockquote></p><p> <b>NG EPS 1Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 3Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 5Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 10Y ≥ 10%</b></p><p><blockquote><b>NG EPS 1Y≥10%且NG EPS 3Y≥10%且NG EPS 5Y≥10%且NG EPS 10Y≥10%</b></blockquote></p><p> Additionally, I screened for stocks trading at reasonable valuations. What I mean by “reasonable” is based on my quality/valuation matrix, which gives preferential treatment to higher quality stocks. Essentially, I’m willing to pay a small premium for the highest quality stocks and I demand a larger discount for lower-quality stocks:</p><p><blockquote>此外，我还筛选了估值合理的股票。我所说的“合理”是基于我的质量/估值矩阵，该矩阵优先考虑更高质量的股票。本质上，我愿意为最高质量的股票支付少量溢价，并要求为较低质量的股票提供更大的折扣：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70d7af9e75bd202d2d9cabb79d04964c\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> I calculate&nbsp;<b>Buy Below</b>&nbsp;prices relative to my fair value [FV] estimates based on this quality/valuation matrix.</p><p><blockquote>我计算<b>在下面购买</b>相对于我基于此质量/估值矩阵的公允价值[FV]估计的价格。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, I screened for stocks with a&nbsp;5-year yield on cost[YoC] above 3%. This metric combines the forward yield and 5-year dividend growth rate [DGR] to determine what your dividend would be relative to today’s stock price after five years of investment, assuming the DGR is maintained.</p><p><blockquote>最后，我筛选了5年期成本收益率[YoC]高于3%的股票。该指标结合了远期收益率和5年股息增长率[DGR]，以确定投资五年后您的股息相对于当前股价的水平（假设DGR保持不变）。</blockquote></p><p> Here is a summary of this month’s screens in general terms:</p><p><blockquote>以下是本月屏幕的概括总结：</blockquote></p><p> <ol>  <li>Exceptional earnings for at least ten years</li>  <li>Reasonable current valuation</li>  <li>Reasonable future dividend income</li> </ol> The latest&nbsp;Dividend Radar(dated July 30, 2021) contains 762 stocks.</p><p><blockquote><ol><li>至少十年的非凡收益</li><li>合理的当前估值</li><li>合理的未来股息收入</li></ol>最新的股息雷达（日期为2021年7月30日）包含762只股票。</blockquote></p><p> Applying the first (fairly stringent) screen reduces the list to only 87 candidates. (Of these, only 20 pass the second screen and only 11 also survive the third screen).</p><p><blockquote>应用第一次（相当严格的）筛选将列表减少到只有87个候选人。（其中，只有20人通过了第二次筛选，只有11人通过了第三次筛选）。</blockquote></p><p> I ranked the candidates by sorting their quality scores (determined via&nbsp;DVK Quality Snapshots) in descending order and used the following metrics, in turn, to break ties:</p><p><blockquote>我通过按降序对候选人的质量分数（通过DVK质量快照确定）进行排序，并依次使用以下指标来打破平局：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Simply Safe Dividends' Dividend Safety Scores</li>  <li><i>S&amp;P Credit Ratings</i></li>  <li>Dividend Yield</li> </ul> The tables below show the top seven stocks in rank-order.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Simply Safe股息的股息安全评分</li><li><i>标准普尔信用评级</i></li><li>股息率</li></ul>下表按排名顺序显示了排名前七的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>7 Top-Ranked Dividend Growth Stocks for August</b></p><p><blockquote><b>8月份股息增长排名靠前的7只股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are top-ranked dividend growth stocks that pass this month’s screens:</p><p><blockquote>以下是本月通过筛选的股息增长排名靠前的股票：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74ac455b7df108e6e1de77ba837a01c\" tg-width=\"865\" tg-height=\"156\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> I own the six highlighted stocks in my&nbsp;DivGro portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>我拥有DivGro投资组合中突出显示的六只股票。</blockquote></p><p> Below, I provide a table with key metrics of interest to dividend growth investors, including the dividend increase streak (<b>Years</b>), the dividend&nbsp;<b>Yield</b>&nbsp;for a recent share&nbsp;<b>Price</b>, and the 5-year dividend growth rate (<b>5-Yr DGR</b>). The&nbsp;<i>Chowder Number</i>(<b>CDN</b>) and 5-year YoC (<b>5-Yr YoC</b>) are measures of a stock’s future total return and dividend income prospects, while the 5-year trailing total returns (<b>5-Yr TTR</b>) is a measure of the stock’s performance over the past five years.</p><p><blockquote>下面，我提供了一个表格，其中包含股息增长投资者感兴趣的关键指标，包括股息增长趋势（<b>年</b>），股息<b>产量</b>对于最近的分享<b>价格</b>，以及5年股息增长率(<b>5年DGR</b>).The<i>杂烩数</i>(<b>CDN</b>）和5年YoC（<b>5年YoC</b>）是衡量股票未来总回报和股息收入前景的指标，而5年追踪总回报（<b>5年TTR</b>）是衡量股票过去五年表现的指标。</blockquote></p><p> I also provide thefive quality indicatorsused in determining each stock's quality score (<b>Qual</b>), as well as my FV estimate (<b>Fair Value</b>) to help identify stocks that trade at favorable valuations. The discount/premium column (<b>–Disc/+Prem</b>) shows the discount or premium of a recent share price to my FV estimates. The last column shows my&nbsp;<b>Buy Below</b>&nbsp;price.</p><p><blockquote>我还提供了用于确定每只股票质量分数的五个质量指标（<b>哪个</b>），以及我的FV估计（<b>公允价值</b>）来帮助识别以有利估值交易的股票。折扣/溢价栏（<b>-盘/+Prem</b>）显示最近股价相对于我的FV估计的折扣或溢价。最后一列显示了我的<b>在下面购买</b>价格。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f324d83432096c060b5f6c3d8160bb2\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"357\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Key metrics and fair value estimates of August’s Top 7 Dividend Growth Stocks (includes data sourced from Dividend Radar).</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>8月份股息增长前7名股票的关键指标和公允价值估计（包括来自股息雷达的数据）。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> I use a survey approach to derive my FV estimates. I collect FV estimates and price targets from several sources, including Morningstar and Finbox. I also&nbsp;estimate fair valueusing each stock’s five-year average dividend yield. With several estimates and targets available, I ignore the outliers (the lowest and highest values) and use the average of the median and mean of the remaining values as my FV estimate.</p><p><blockquote>我使用调查方法来得出我的FV估计值。我从多个来源收集FV预估和价格目标，包括晨星和Finbox。我还使用每只股票的五年平均股息收益率来估计公允价值。有了几个可用的估计值和目标，我忽略离群值（最低值和最高值），并使用剩余值的中值和平均值的平均值作为我的FV估计值。</blockquote></p><p> Next, let's look at each stock in turn. All data and graphs are courtesy of&nbsp;Portfolio-Insight.com.</p><p><blockquote>接下来，我们依次看一下每只股票。所有数据和图表均由Portfolio-Insight.com提供。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Home Depot, Inc (HD)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>家得宝公司(HD)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1978 and based in Atlanta, Georgia, HD is a home improvement retailer that sells an assortment of building materials, home improvement products, and lawn and garden products. HD provides installation, home maintenance, and professional service programs to do-it-yourself, do-it-for-me, and professional customers.</p><p><blockquote>HD成立于1978年，总部位于佐治亚州亚特兰大，是一家家居装修零售商，销售各种建筑材料、家居装修产品以及草坪和花园产品。HD为自己动手、为我动手和专业客户提供安装、家庭维护和专业服务计划。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6842eea771a305e92d0bb6d957bd57d2\" tg-width=\"1207\" tg-height=\"395\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f3ed296edb6ead77589b6d4b07cbe5\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"547\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>HD non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>HD非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>洛克希德马丁公司(LMT)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1909 and headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, LMT is a global security and aerospace company engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems. LMT operates through four segments, Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space Systems.</p><p><blockquote>LMT成立于1909年，总部位于马里兰州贝塞斯达，是一家全球安全和航空航天公司，从事先进技术系统的研究、设计、开发、制造、集成和维护。LMT通过四个部门运营：航空、导弹和火控、旋转和任务系统以及空间系统。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/359b23f2763ac619280d013761595377\" tg-width=\"1211\" tg-height=\"400\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47748a713424d38d792d7a3f143cd43e\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"544\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>LMT non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>LMT非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>BlackRock, Inc. (BLK)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>贝莱德公司(BLK)</b></blockquote></p><p> BLK is an investment management company that provides a range of investment and risk management services to institutional and retail clients across the world. The company’s offerings include single and multi-asset class portfolios investing in equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market instruments. BLK was founded in 1988 and is based in New York City.</p><p><blockquote>BLK是一家投资管理公司，为全球机构和零售客户提供一系列投资和风险管理服务。该公司的产品包括投资于股票、固定收益、另类投资和货币市场工具的单一和多资产类别投资组合。BLK成立于1988年，总部位于纽约市。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c563eda1121ff8577ac7143aa5dce6b\" tg-width=\"1211\" tg-height=\"397\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35801c7a805cdb486138d656804ecff2\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"547\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>劳氏公司(LOW)</b></blockquote></p><p> LOW is a home improvement retailer. The company offers a complete line of products for maintenance, repair, remodeling, and home decorating. It also offers installation services through independent contractors, as well as extended protection plans and repair services. LOW was founded in 1946 and is based in Mooresville, North Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>LOW是一家家装零售商。该公司为维护、修理、改造和家居装饰提供完整的产品系列。它还通过独立承包商提供安装服务，以及扩展保护计划和维修服务。LOW成立于1946年，总部位于北卡罗来纳州穆尔斯维尔。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fac3795d1f098c20a7134b2ba6385f26\" tg-width=\"1214\" tg-height=\"401\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf243f7d5e513612959d20eac51de310\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"552\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>LOW non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>非GAAP每股收益和支付股息(TTM)较低，股价重叠</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司(NOC)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1939 and based in Falls Church, Virginia, NOC is a leading global security company with both government and commercial customers. NOC provides systems, products, and solutions in unmanned systems; cyber security; command, control, communications and computers intelligence; surveillance and reconnaissance; and logistics and modernization.</p><p><blockquote>NOC成立于1939年，总部位于弗吉尼亚州福尔斯彻奇，是一家全球领先的安全公司，拥有政府和商业客户。NOC提供无人系统中的系统、产品和解决方案；网络安全；指挥、控制、通信和计算机情报；监视和侦察；以及物流和现代化。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d3c9d83f1ce89ce88fbc4db0563e90c\" tg-width=\"1210\" tg-height=\"399\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed575536c4cdb7b3eefe171a50640922\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"546\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>NOC non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>NOC非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Allstate Corporation (ALL)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>好事达公司(ALL)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1931 and headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, ALL is a holding company engaged in property-liability insurance and life insurance in the United States and Canada. The company sells insurance products covering automobiles, homes, and other properties under the Allstate, Esurance, and Encompass brand names. It also sells life insurance and voluntary accident and health insurance products.</p><p><blockquote>ALL成立于1931年，总部位于伊利诺伊州诺斯布鲁克，是一家在美国和加拿大从事财产责任保险和人寿保险的控股公司。该公司以Allstate、Esurance和Encompass品牌销售涵盖汽车、房屋和其他财产的保险产品。它还销售人寿保险以及自愿意外和健康保险产品。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d9e2dcf663b98cc621720a0351a3cf9\" tg-width=\"1212\" tg-height=\"398\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8d93c9b392e2af4424e59a71fe1333c\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ALL non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>所有非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>L3哈里斯技术公司(LHX)</b></blockquote></p><p> LHX, an aerospace and defense technology company, provides mission-critical solutions for government and commercial customers worldwide. The company operates in four segments: Integrated Mission Systems, Space and Airborne Systems, Communication Systems, and Aviation Systems. LHX was founded in 1895 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Florida.</p><p><blockquote>LHX是一家航空航天和国防技术公司，为全球政府和商业客户提供关键任务解决方案。该公司分为四个部门：综合任务系统、太空和机载系统、通信系统和航空系统。LHX成立于1895年，总部位于佛罗里达州墨尔本。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5231f6010e48ff033da34b6f76ed3e2b\" tg-width=\"1212\" tg-height=\"400\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/182d5456cf84b655db04ad703cc681d4\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"552\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>LHX non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>LHX非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Concluding Remarks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结束语</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbb1e63ebd49ef16583c3992662d1c4f\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"359\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> In this article, I ranked reasonably valued dividend growth stocks in Dividend Radar that have maintained Non-GAAP EPS growth rates of at least 10% for the past ten years. I also required a 5-year YoC of at least 3%.</p><p><blockquote>在本文中，我对股息雷达中估值合理的股息增长股票进行了排名，这些股票在过去十年中保持了至少10%的非GAAP每股收益增长率。我还要求5年期YoC至少为3%。</blockquote></p><p> I own six of this month’s stocks. With the exception of my ALL position, my positions are all full-sized positions as determined by my dynamic and flexible&nbsp;portfolio target weighting&nbsp;strategy. ALL is underweight and I would need to add about 75 shares to make if a full-sized position. Given ALL’s 18% discount, it appears to be a good time to do so!</p><p><blockquote>我持有本月的六只股票。除了我的ALL头寸外，我的头寸都是由我的动态灵活的投资组合目标权重策略决定的全尺寸头寸。全部都是跑输大盘，我需要增加大约75股才能建立全仓头寸。鉴于所有的18%折扣，这似乎是一个很好的时机！</blockquote></p><p> I don’t own LHX and it looks like an interesting candidate to consider, though I prefer to open new positions when they offer 5-Year YoC’s of at least 4%. Nevertheless, LHX have impressive growth prospects and a low payout ratio, so I’m going to spend some time researching the stock.</p><p><blockquote>我不拥有LHX，它看起来是一个值得考虑的有趣候选人，尽管我更喜欢在他们提供至少4%的5年期YoC时开设新头寸。尽管如此，LHX具有令人印象深刻的增长前景和较低的派息率，因此我将花一些时间研究该股票。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 Dividend Growth Stocks For August 2021<blockquote>2021年8月7只股息增长股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 Dividend Growth Stocks For August 2021<blockquote>2021年8月7只股息增长股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 11:21</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>These companies are delivering exceptional earnings and dividend growth, and their stocks are trading at reasonable valuations.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司实现了卓越的盈利和股息增长，并且其股票的估值合理。</blockquote></p><p> Last month I started a new series that will rank selections ofDividend Radarstocks and present the seven top-ranked stocks for consideration. Dividend Radar tracks stocks trading on U.S. exchanges with dividend increase streaks of at least five years.</p><p><blockquote>上个月，我开始了一个新系列，将对股息雷达股票的选择进行排名，并提出排名靠前的七只股票供考虑。股息雷达跟踪在美国交易所交易的股息至少五年连续增加的股票。</blockquote></p><p> Each month, I’ll consider different screens to narrow down the more than 750 Dividend Radar stocks. Screens will focus on various aspects of dividend growth investing, such as dividend yield, dividend growth rate, and stock valuation.</p><p><blockquote>每个月，我都会考虑不同的屏幕来缩小750多只股息雷达股票的范围。屏幕将重点关注股息增长投资的各个方面，例如股息收益率、股息增长率和股票估值。</blockquote></p><p> This month, I screened for stocks of companies that have delivered exceptional earnings growth over the last ten years. Additionally, I screened for stocks trading at reasonable valuations and required a 5-year yield on cost (YoC) of at least 3%.</p><p><blockquote>本月，我筛选了过去十年中盈利增长异常的公司股票。此外，我筛选了估值合理的股票，并要求5年期成本收益率(YoC)至少为3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Screening and Ranking</b></p><p><blockquote><b>筛选和排名</b></blockquote></p><p> Earnings and earnings growth are the foundation of dividends and dividend growth. Companies could use debt to pay dividends, such as when earnings temporarily are insufficient to cover dividend payouts. Eventually, though, that debt will have to be repaid from earnings, which, presumably and hopefully, would be sufficient to pay off debt and pay the dividend.</p><p><blockquote>盈利和盈利增长是股息和股息增长的基础。公司可以利用债务来支付股息，例如当收益暂时不足以支付股息支付时。不过，最终，这笔债务将不得不从收益中偿还，这大概也有希望足以偿还债务和支付股息。</blockquote></p><p> Portfolio Insight&nbsp;provides earnings and earnings growth data that we can monitor to get a sense of a company’s ability to continue paying and increasing dividends. For this month’s article, I considered Non-GAAP EPS compound annual growth rates [CAGRs] for different time frames. Here’s the specific screening formula:</p><p><blockquote>Portfolio Insight提供盈利和盈利增长数据，我们可以监控这些数据，以了解公司继续支付和增加股息的能力。在本月的文章中，我考虑了不同时间范围内的非GAAP每股收益复合年增长率[CAGR]。下面是具体的筛选公式：</blockquote></p><p> <b>NG EPS 1Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 3Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 5Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 10Y ≥ 10%</b></p><p><blockquote><b>NG EPS 1Y≥10%且NG EPS 3Y≥10%且NG EPS 5Y≥10%且NG EPS 10Y≥10%</b></blockquote></p><p> Additionally, I screened for stocks trading at reasonable valuations. What I mean by “reasonable” is based on my quality/valuation matrix, which gives preferential treatment to higher quality stocks. Essentially, I’m willing to pay a small premium for the highest quality stocks and I demand a larger discount for lower-quality stocks:</p><p><blockquote>此外，我还筛选了估值合理的股票。我所说的“合理”是基于我的质量/估值矩阵，该矩阵优先考虑更高质量的股票。本质上，我愿意为最高质量的股票支付少量溢价，并要求为较低质量的股票提供更大的折扣：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70d7af9e75bd202d2d9cabb79d04964c\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> I calculate&nbsp;<b>Buy Below</b>&nbsp;prices relative to my fair value [FV] estimates based on this quality/valuation matrix.</p><p><blockquote>我计算<b>在下面购买</b>相对于我基于此质量/估值矩阵的公允价值[FV]估计的价格。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, I screened for stocks with a&nbsp;5-year yield on cost[YoC] above 3%. This metric combines the forward yield and 5-year dividend growth rate [DGR] to determine what your dividend would be relative to today’s stock price after five years of investment, assuming the DGR is maintained.</p><p><blockquote>最后，我筛选了5年期成本收益率[YoC]高于3%的股票。该指标结合了远期收益率和5年股息增长率[DGR]，以确定投资五年后您的股息相对于当前股价的水平（假设DGR保持不变）。</blockquote></p><p> Here is a summary of this month’s screens in general terms:</p><p><blockquote>以下是本月屏幕的概括总结：</blockquote></p><p> <ol>  <li>Exceptional earnings for at least ten years</li>  <li>Reasonable current valuation</li>  <li>Reasonable future dividend income</li> </ol> The latest&nbsp;Dividend Radar(dated July 30, 2021) contains 762 stocks.</p><p><blockquote><ol><li>至少十年的非凡收益</li><li>合理的当前估值</li><li>合理的未来股息收入</li></ol>最新的股息雷达（日期为2021年7月30日）包含762只股票。</blockquote></p><p> Applying the first (fairly stringent) screen reduces the list to only 87 candidates. (Of these, only 20 pass the second screen and only 11 also survive the third screen).</p><p><blockquote>应用第一次（相当严格的）筛选将列表减少到只有87个候选人。（其中，只有20人通过了第二次筛选，只有11人通过了第三次筛选）。</blockquote></p><p> I ranked the candidates by sorting their quality scores (determined via&nbsp;DVK Quality Snapshots) in descending order and used the following metrics, in turn, to break ties:</p><p><blockquote>我通过按降序对候选人的质量分数（通过DVK质量快照确定）进行排序，并依次使用以下指标来打破平局：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Simply Safe Dividends' Dividend Safety Scores</li>  <li><i>S&amp;P Credit Ratings</i></li>  <li>Dividend Yield</li> </ul> The tables below show the top seven stocks in rank-order.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Simply Safe股息的股息安全评分</li><li><i>标准普尔信用评级</i></li><li>股息率</li></ul>下表按排名顺序显示了排名前七的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>7 Top-Ranked Dividend Growth Stocks for August</b></p><p><blockquote><b>8月份股息增长排名靠前的7只股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are top-ranked dividend growth stocks that pass this month’s screens:</p><p><blockquote>以下是本月通过筛选的股息增长排名靠前的股票：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74ac455b7df108e6e1de77ba837a01c\" tg-width=\"865\" tg-height=\"156\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> I own the six highlighted stocks in my&nbsp;DivGro portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>我拥有DivGro投资组合中突出显示的六只股票。</blockquote></p><p> Below, I provide a table with key metrics of interest to dividend growth investors, including the dividend increase streak (<b>Years</b>), the dividend&nbsp;<b>Yield</b>&nbsp;for a recent share&nbsp;<b>Price</b>, and the 5-year dividend growth rate (<b>5-Yr DGR</b>). The&nbsp;<i>Chowder Number</i>(<b>CDN</b>) and 5-year YoC (<b>5-Yr YoC</b>) are measures of a stock’s future total return and dividend income prospects, while the 5-year trailing total returns (<b>5-Yr TTR</b>) is a measure of the stock’s performance over the past five years.</p><p><blockquote>下面，我提供了一个表格，其中包含股息增长投资者感兴趣的关键指标，包括股息增长趋势（<b>年</b>），股息<b>产量</b>对于最近的分享<b>价格</b>，以及5年股息增长率(<b>5年DGR</b>).The<i>杂烩数</i>(<b>CDN</b>）和5年YoC（<b>5年YoC</b>）是衡量股票未来总回报和股息收入前景的指标，而5年追踪总回报（<b>5年TTR</b>）是衡量股票过去五年表现的指标。</blockquote></p><p> I also provide thefive quality indicatorsused in determining each stock's quality score (<b>Qual</b>), as well as my FV estimate (<b>Fair Value</b>) to help identify stocks that trade at favorable valuations. The discount/premium column (<b>–Disc/+Prem</b>) shows the discount or premium of a recent share price to my FV estimates. The last column shows my&nbsp;<b>Buy Below</b>&nbsp;price.</p><p><blockquote>我还提供了用于确定每只股票质量分数的五个质量指标（<b>哪个</b>），以及我的FV估计（<b>公允价值</b>）来帮助识别以有利估值交易的股票。折扣/溢价栏（<b>-盘/+Prem</b>）显示最近股价相对于我的FV估计的折扣或溢价。最后一列显示了我的<b>在下面购买</b>价格。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f324d83432096c060b5f6c3d8160bb2\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"357\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Key metrics and fair value estimates of August’s Top 7 Dividend Growth Stocks (includes data sourced from Dividend Radar).</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>8月份股息增长前7名股票的关键指标和公允价值估计（包括来自股息雷达的数据）。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> I use a survey approach to derive my FV estimates. I collect FV estimates and price targets from several sources, including Morningstar and Finbox. I also&nbsp;estimate fair valueusing each stock’s five-year average dividend yield. With several estimates and targets available, I ignore the outliers (the lowest and highest values) and use the average of the median and mean of the remaining values as my FV estimate.</p><p><blockquote>我使用调查方法来得出我的FV估计值。我从多个来源收集FV预估和价格目标，包括晨星和Finbox。我还使用每只股票的五年平均股息收益率来估计公允价值。有了几个可用的估计值和目标，我忽略离群值（最低值和最高值），并使用剩余值的中值和平均值的平均值作为我的FV估计值。</blockquote></p><p> Next, let's look at each stock in turn. All data and graphs are courtesy of&nbsp;Portfolio-Insight.com.</p><p><blockquote>接下来，我们依次看一下每只股票。所有数据和图表均由Portfolio-Insight.com提供。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Home Depot, Inc (HD)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>家得宝公司(HD)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1978 and based in Atlanta, Georgia, HD is a home improvement retailer that sells an assortment of building materials, home improvement products, and lawn and garden products. HD provides installation, home maintenance, and professional service programs to do-it-yourself, do-it-for-me, and professional customers.</p><p><blockquote>HD成立于1978年，总部位于佐治亚州亚特兰大，是一家家居装修零售商，销售各种建筑材料、家居装修产品以及草坪和花园产品。HD为自己动手、为我动手和专业客户提供安装、家庭维护和专业服务计划。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6842eea771a305e92d0bb6d957bd57d2\" tg-width=\"1207\" tg-height=\"395\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f3ed296edb6ead77589b6d4b07cbe5\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"547\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>HD non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>HD非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>洛克希德马丁公司(LMT)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1909 and headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, LMT is a global security and aerospace company engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems. LMT operates through four segments, Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space Systems.</p><p><blockquote>LMT成立于1909年，总部位于马里兰州贝塞斯达，是一家全球安全和航空航天公司，从事先进技术系统的研究、设计、开发、制造、集成和维护。LMT通过四个部门运营：航空、导弹和火控、旋转和任务系统以及空间系统。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/359b23f2763ac619280d013761595377\" tg-width=\"1211\" tg-height=\"400\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47748a713424d38d792d7a3f143cd43e\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"544\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>LMT non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>LMT非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>BlackRock, Inc. (BLK)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>贝莱德公司(BLK)</b></blockquote></p><p> BLK is an investment management company that provides a range of investment and risk management services to institutional and retail clients across the world. The company’s offerings include single and multi-asset class portfolios investing in equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market instruments. BLK was founded in 1988 and is based in New York City.</p><p><blockquote>BLK是一家投资管理公司，为全球机构和零售客户提供一系列投资和风险管理服务。该公司的产品包括投资于股票、固定收益、另类投资和货币市场工具的单一和多资产类别投资组合。BLK成立于1988年，总部位于纽约市。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c563eda1121ff8577ac7143aa5dce6b\" tg-width=\"1211\" tg-height=\"397\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35801c7a805cdb486138d656804ecff2\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"547\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>劳氏公司(LOW)</b></blockquote></p><p> LOW is a home improvement retailer. The company offers a complete line of products for maintenance, repair, remodeling, and home decorating. It also offers installation services through independent contractors, as well as extended protection plans and repair services. LOW was founded in 1946 and is based in Mooresville, North Carolina.</p><p><blockquote>LOW是一家家装零售商。该公司为维护、修理、改造和家居装饰提供完整的产品系列。它还通过独立承包商提供安装服务，以及扩展保护计划和维修服务。LOW成立于1946年，总部位于北卡罗来纳州穆尔斯维尔。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fac3795d1f098c20a7134b2ba6385f26\" tg-width=\"1214\" tg-height=\"401\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf243f7d5e513612959d20eac51de310\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"552\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>LOW non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>非GAAP每股收益和支付股息(TTM)较低，股价重叠</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司(NOC)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1939 and based in Falls Church, Virginia, NOC is a leading global security company with both government and commercial customers. NOC provides systems, products, and solutions in unmanned systems; cyber security; command, control, communications and computers intelligence; surveillance and reconnaissance; and logistics and modernization.</p><p><blockquote>NOC成立于1939年，总部位于弗吉尼亚州福尔斯彻奇，是一家全球领先的安全公司，拥有政府和商业客户。NOC提供无人系统中的系统、产品和解决方案；网络安全；指挥、控制、通信和计算机情报；监视和侦察；以及物流和现代化。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d3c9d83f1ce89ce88fbc4db0563e90c\" tg-width=\"1210\" tg-height=\"399\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed575536c4cdb7b3eefe171a50640922\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"546\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>NOC non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>NOC非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Allstate Corporation (ALL)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>好事达公司(ALL)</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 1931 and headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, ALL is a holding company engaged in property-liability insurance and life insurance in the United States and Canada. The company sells insurance products covering automobiles, homes, and other properties under the Allstate, Esurance, and Encompass brand names. It also sells life insurance and voluntary accident and health insurance products.</p><p><blockquote>ALL成立于1931年，总部位于伊利诺伊州诺斯布鲁克，是一家在美国和加拿大从事财产责任保险和人寿保险的控股公司。该公司以Allstate、Esurance和Encompass品牌销售涵盖汽车、房屋和其他财产的保险产品。它还销售人寿保险以及自愿意外和健康保险产品。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d9e2dcf663b98cc621720a0351a3cf9\" tg-width=\"1212\" tg-height=\"398\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8d93c9b392e2af4424e59a71fe1333c\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ALL non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>所有非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)</b></p><p><blockquote><b>L3哈里斯技术公司(LHX)</b></blockquote></p><p> LHX, an aerospace and defense technology company, provides mission-critical solutions for government and commercial customers worldwide. The company operates in four segments: Integrated Mission Systems, Space and Airborne Systems, Communication Systems, and Aviation Systems. LHX was founded in 1895 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Florida.</p><p><blockquote>LHX是一家航空航天和国防技术公司，为全球政府和商业客户提供关键任务解决方案。该公司分为四个部门：综合任务系统、太空和机载系统、通信系统和航空系统。LHX成立于1895年，总部位于佛罗里达州墨尔本。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5231f6010e48ff033da34b6f76ed3e2b\" tg-width=\"1212\" tg-height=\"400\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/182d5456cf84b655db04ad703cc681d4\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"552\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>LHX non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>LHX非GAAP每股收益和已付股息(TTM)，带股价叠加</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Concluding Remarks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>结束语</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbb1e63ebd49ef16583c3992662d1c4f\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"359\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> In this article, I ranked reasonably valued dividend growth stocks in Dividend Radar that have maintained Non-GAAP EPS growth rates of at least 10% for the past ten years. I also required a 5-year YoC of at least 3%.</p><p><blockquote>在本文中，我对股息雷达中估值合理的股息增长股票进行了排名，这些股票在过去十年中保持了至少10%的非GAAP每股收益增长率。我还要求5年期YoC至少为3%。</blockquote></p><p> I own six of this month’s stocks. With the exception of my ALL position, my positions are all full-sized positions as determined by my dynamic and flexible&nbsp;portfolio target weighting&nbsp;strategy. ALL is underweight and I would need to add about 75 shares to make if a full-sized position. Given ALL’s 18% discount, it appears to be a good time to do so!</p><p><blockquote>我持有本月的六只股票。除了我的ALL头寸外，我的头寸都是由我的动态灵活的投资组合目标权重策略决定的全尺寸头寸。全部都是跑输大盘，我需要增加大约75股才能建立全仓头寸。鉴于所有的18%折扣，这似乎是一个很好的时机！</blockquote></p><p> I don’t own LHX and it looks like an interesting candidate to consider, though I prefer to open new positions when they offer 5-Year YoC’s of at least 4%. Nevertheless, LHX have impressive growth prospects and a low payout ratio, so I’m going to spend some time researching the stock.</p><p><blockquote>我不拥有LHX，它看起来是一个值得考虑的有趣候选人，尽管我更喜欢在他们提供至少4%的5年期YoC时开设新头寸。尽管如此，LHX具有令人印象深刻的增长前景和较低的派息率，因此我将花一些时间研究该股票。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/dividendstrategists/dividend-ideas/7-dividend-growth-stocks-for-august-2021\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ALL":"好事达","LMT":"洛克希德马丁","LHX":"L3Harris Technologies Inc","BLK":"贝莱德","LOW":"劳氏","NOC":"诺斯罗普格鲁曼","HD":"家得宝"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/dividendstrategists/dividend-ideas/7-dividend-growth-stocks-for-august-2021","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1122614377","content_text":"These companies are delivering exceptional earnings and dividend growth, and their stocks are trading at reasonable valuations.\nLast month I started a new series that will rank selections ofDividend Radarstocks and present the seven top-ranked stocks for consideration. Dividend Radar tracks stocks trading on U.S. exchanges with dividend increase streaks of at least five years.\nEach month, I’ll consider different screens to narrow down the more than 750 Dividend Radar stocks. Screens will focus on various aspects of dividend growth investing, such as dividend yield, dividend growth rate, and stock valuation.\nThis month, I screened for stocks of companies that have delivered exceptional earnings growth over the last ten years. Additionally, I screened for stocks trading at reasonable valuations and required a 5-year yield on cost (YoC) of at least 3%.\nScreening and Ranking\nEarnings and earnings growth are the foundation of dividends and dividend growth. Companies could use debt to pay dividends, such as when earnings temporarily are insufficient to cover dividend payouts. Eventually, though, that debt will have to be repaid from earnings, which, presumably and hopefully, would be sufficient to pay off debt and pay the dividend.\nPortfolio Insight provides earnings and earnings growth data that we can monitor to get a sense of a company’s ability to continue paying and increasing dividends. For this month’s article, I considered Non-GAAP EPS compound annual growth rates [CAGRs] for different time frames. Here’s the specific screening formula:\nNG EPS 1Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 3Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 5Y ≥ 10% and NG EPS 10Y ≥ 10%\nAdditionally, I screened for stocks trading at reasonable valuations. What I mean by “reasonable” is based on my quality/valuation matrix, which gives preferential treatment to higher quality stocks. Essentially, I’m willing to pay a small premium for the highest quality stocks and I demand a larger discount for lower-quality stocks:\n\nI calculate Buy Below prices relative to my fair value [FV] estimates based on this quality/valuation matrix.\nFinally, I screened for stocks with a 5-year yield on cost[YoC] above 3%. This metric combines the forward yield and 5-year dividend growth rate [DGR] to determine what your dividend would be relative to today’s stock price after five years of investment, assuming the DGR is maintained.\nHere is a summary of this month’s screens in general terms:\n\nExceptional earnings for at least ten years\nReasonable current valuation\nReasonable future dividend income\n\nThe latest Dividend Radar(dated July 30, 2021) contains 762 stocks.\nApplying the first (fairly stringent) screen reduces the list to only 87 candidates. (Of these, only 20 pass the second screen and only 11 also survive the third screen).\nI ranked the candidates by sorting their quality scores (determined via DVK Quality Snapshots) in descending order and used the following metrics, in turn, to break ties:\n\nSimply Safe Dividends' Dividend Safety Scores\nS&P Credit Ratings\nDividend Yield\n\nThe tables below show the top seven stocks in rank-order.\n7 Top-Ranked Dividend Growth Stocks for August\nHere are top-ranked dividend growth stocks that pass this month’s screens:\n\nI own the six highlighted stocks in my DivGro portfolio.\nBelow, I provide a table with key metrics of interest to dividend growth investors, including the dividend increase streak (Years), the dividend Yield for a recent share Price, and the 5-year dividend growth rate (5-Yr DGR). The Chowder Number(CDN) and 5-year YoC (5-Yr YoC) are measures of a stock’s future total return and dividend income prospects, while the 5-year trailing total returns (5-Yr TTR) is a measure of the stock’s performance over the past five years.\nI also provide thefive quality indicatorsused in determining each stock's quality score (Qual), as well as my FV estimate (Fair Value) to help identify stocks that trade at favorable valuations. The discount/premium column (–Disc/+Prem) shows the discount or premium of a recent share price to my FV estimates. The last column shows my Buy Below price.\nKey metrics and fair value estimates of August’s Top 7 Dividend Growth Stocks (includes data sourced from Dividend Radar).\nI use a survey approach to derive my FV estimates. I collect FV estimates and price targets from several sources, including Morningstar and Finbox. I also estimate fair valueusing each stock’s five-year average dividend yield. With several estimates and targets available, I ignore the outliers (the lowest and highest values) and use the average of the median and mean of the remaining values as my FV estimate.\nNext, let's look at each stock in turn. All data and graphs are courtesy of Portfolio-Insight.com.\nThe Home Depot, Inc (HD)\nFounded in 1978 and based in Atlanta, Georgia, HD is a home improvement retailer that sells an assortment of building materials, home improvement products, and lawn and garden products. HD provides installation, home maintenance, and professional service programs to do-it-yourself, do-it-for-me, and professional customers.\n\nHD non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay\nLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)\nFounded in 1909 and headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, LMT is a global security and aerospace company engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems. LMT operates through four segments, Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space Systems.\n\nLMT non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay\nBlackRock, Inc. (BLK)\nBLK is an investment management company that provides a range of investment and risk management services to institutional and retail clients across the world. The company’s offerings include single and multi-asset class portfolios investing in equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market instruments. BLK was founded in 1988 and is based in New York City.\n\nLowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)\nLOW is a home improvement retailer. The company offers a complete line of products for maintenance, repair, remodeling, and home decorating. It also offers installation services through independent contractors, as well as extended protection plans and repair services. LOW was founded in 1946 and is based in Mooresville, North Carolina.\n\nLOW non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay\nNorthrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)\nFounded in 1939 and based in Falls Church, Virginia, NOC is a leading global security company with both government and commercial customers. NOC provides systems, products, and solutions in unmanned systems; cyber security; command, control, communications and computers intelligence; surveillance and reconnaissance; and logistics and modernization.\n\nNOC non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay\nThe Allstate Corporation (ALL)\nFounded in 1931 and headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, ALL is a holding company engaged in property-liability insurance and life insurance in the United States and Canada. The company sells insurance products covering automobiles, homes, and other properties under the Allstate, Esurance, and Encompass brand names. It also sells life insurance and voluntary accident and health insurance products.\n\nALL non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay\nL3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)\nLHX, an aerospace and defense technology company, provides mission-critical solutions for government and commercial customers worldwide. The company operates in four segments: Integrated Mission Systems, Space and Airborne Systems, Communication Systems, and Aviation Systems. LHX was founded in 1895 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Florida.\n\nLHX non-GAAP EPS and dividends paid (TTM), with stock price overlay\nConcluding Remarks\n\nIn this article, I ranked reasonably valued dividend growth stocks in Dividend Radar that have maintained Non-GAAP EPS growth rates of at least 10% for the past ten years. I also required a 5-year YoC of at least 3%.\nI own six of this month’s stocks. With the exception of my ALL position, my positions are all full-sized positions as determined by my dynamic and flexible portfolio target weighting strategy. ALL is underweight and I would need to add about 75 shares to make if a full-sized position. Given ALL’s 18% discount, it appears to be a good time to do so!\nI don’t own LHX and it looks like an interesting candidate to consider, though I prefer to open new positions when they offer 5-Year YoC’s of at least 4%. Nevertheless, LHX have impressive growth prospects and a low payout ratio, so I’m going to spend some time researching the stock.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NOC":0.9,"LMT":0.9,"LOW":0.9,"BLK":0.9,"LHX":0.9,"ALL":0.9,"HD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1342,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150681798,"gmtCreate":1624896335314,"gmtModify":1633947281742,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/150681798","repostId":"2146836375","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1755,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":124408205,"gmtCreate":1624776404007,"gmtModify":1633948697628,"author":{"id":"3575811912571873","authorId":"3575811912571873","name":"Linggz_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9354834ebc76efe0645a97f992de4874","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575811912571873","authorIdStr":"3575811912571873"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"X","listText":"X","text":"X","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/124408205","repostId":"1189436009","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"followers","isTTM":false}